Item - 2010.PG39.9

Tracking Status

PG39.9 - Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Wards:
All

City Council Decision

City Council on July 6, 7 and 8, 2010, adopted the following:

 

1.         City Council amend the Map contained in Attachment 1 of the supplementary report (June 1, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to designate the Avenue segments on Dundas Street West, between Royal York Road and the Humber River, and Bloor Street West, between the Humber River and Mimico Creek, as character areas.

 

2.         City Council amend Attachment 2, Revised Avenues and Established Districts, of the supplementary report (June 1, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to have the remaining Avenue section on Yonge Street, north of Lawrence Avenue, designated as an Avenue, excluded from the retail study.

 

3.         City Council amend the Study Area Map in Attachment 2 of the report (May 4, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning:

 

a.         to include the section of St. Clair Avenue West from Blackthorne Avenue to Old Weston Road, where the guidelines are not in conflict with the outcome of the appeal of National Rubber Technologies Corporation to Official Plan Amendment 84 with respect to the St. Clair Avenue West corridor between Old Weston Road and Blackthorne Avenue; and

 

b.         by removing Queen Street East from the Avenue and Mid-Rise Buildings Study Area.

 

 

4.         City Council delete Attachments 6 and 7 in the report dated May 4, 2010 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and replace them with revised Attachments 1 and 2 in the supplementary report (June 1, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

5.         City Council request staff to use the "Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards" contained in Section 3 of the report entitled "Avenues & Mid-Rise Buildings Study (May 2010)" and appended as Attachment 5 to the report (May 4, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in the evaluation of all new and current mid-rise development proposals on the Avenues and in the implementation of future Avenue studies so that the Avenues “vision” can be realized more quickly and effectively, subject to Part 8.

 

6.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to monitor the effectiveness of the Mid-Rise Performance Standards referred to in Part 4 above, during a ‘monitoring’ period of approximately two years.

 

7.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report as soon as possible, and prior to the end of the ‘monitoring’ period, respecting the implementation of the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards to the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

 

8.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to incorporate the following matters into the 2011 statutory 5‑Year review of the Official Plan:

 

a.         a review and potential expansion of the Avenues identified on Map 2, Urban Structure Map, of the Official Plan and their underlying Land Use Designations;

 

b.         a review of Map 4, Higher Order Transit Corridors and Map 5, Surface Transit Priority Map, in light of any changes to Map 2 and Transit City;

 

c.         a review of the Avenue policies in Section 2.2.3 of the Official Plan and identification of any Official Plan amendments required to implement the recommendations of the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study, including the future role of Avenue Studies and segment studies;

 

d.         a review of the Built Form policies of Section 3.1.2 of the Official Plan to include the creation of new policies for mid-rise buildings and public realm improvements to implement the recommendations of the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study;

 

e.         a review of policies relating to the preservation and enhancement of public lanes on the Avenues;

 

f.          a review of Secondary Plans and Site and Area Specific Policies relating to areas that overlap with Avenues to identify any appropriate amendments to implement the recommendations of the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study where necessary; and

 

g.         a review of the Housing policies of Section 3.2.1 of the Official Plan and the thresholds for demolition and conversion of rental housing units in the implementing By-law 885-2007.

 

9.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in considering development applications on Avenues, not to apply the principles respecting Enhancement Zones as set out in the Consultants' Study and reports from the Chief Planner dated May 4, 2010 and June 1, 2010.

 

10.       City Council request that the Mid-Rise Buildings Interdivisional Team maintain an ongoing role during the two year phase in period.

Background Information (Committee)

Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-30538.pdf
Performance Standards for Mid-Rise Buildings Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-30539.pdf
Performance Standards for Mid-Rise Buildings Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-30540.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(May 19, 2010) E-mail from Eileen Denny, President, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (PG.Main.PG39.9.1)
(June 16, 2010) E-mail from Eileen Denny, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (PG.New.PG39.9.2)
(June 16, 2010) Letter from John R. R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault (PG.New.PG39.9.3)

Motions (City Council)

1 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Cesar Palacio (Carried)

That City Council amend the Study Area Map in Attachment 2 of the report (May 4, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to include the section of St. Clair Avenue West from Blackthorne Avenue to Old Weston Road, where the guidelines are not in conflict with the outcome of the appeal of National Rubber Technologies Corporation to Official Plan Amendment 84 with respect to the St. Clair Avenue West corridor between Old Weston Road and Blackthorne Avenue.


2 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Paula Fletcher (Carried)

That City Council amend the Study Area Map in Attachment 2 of the report (May 4, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, by removing Queen Street East from the Avenue and Mid-Rise Buildings Study Area.

Vote (Amend Item) Jul-08-2010 10:27 AM

Result: Carried Majority Required - PG39.9 - Fletcher - Motion 2
Total members that voted Yes: 17 Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Sandra Bussin (Chair), Shelley Carroll, Janet Davis, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Adam Giambrone, Norman Kelly, Pam McConnell, Peter Milczyn, Howard Moscoe, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, Gord Perks, Kyle Rae, Adam Vaughan
Total members that voted No: 12 Members that voted No are Brian Ashton, Maria Augimeri, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Doug Holyday, Cliff Jenkins, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Anthony Perruzza, Bill Saundercook, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson
Total members that were Absent: 16 Members that were absent are Raymond Cho, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Mike Feldman, Rob Ford, Mark Grimes, Suzan Hall, A.A. Heaps, Giorgio Mammoliti, Joe Mihevc, David Miller, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Case Ootes, Joe Pantalone, Michael Walker

3 - Motion to Refer Item moved by Councillor Cliff Jenkins (Lost)

That City Council refer this Item to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for resubmission to City Council with the 5-year review of the City's Official Plan.

Vote (Refer Item) Jul-08-2010 10:23 AM

Result: Lost Majority Required - PG39.9 - Jenkins - Motion 3
Total members that voted Yes: 11 Members that voted Yes are Sandra Bussin (Chair), John Filion, Cliff Jenkins, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, Anthony Perruzza, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan
Total members that voted No: 18 Members that voted No are Paul Ainslie, Brian Ashton, Maria Augimeri, Shelley Carroll, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Paula Fletcher, Adam Giambrone, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Chin Lee, Pam McConnell, Peter Milczyn, Howard Moscoe, Gord Perks, Kyle Rae, Bill Saundercook, Michael Thompson
Total members that were Absent: 16 Members that were absent are Raymond Cho, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Mike Feldman, Rob Ford, Mark Grimes, Suzan Hall, A.A. Heaps, Giorgio Mammoliti, Joe Mihevc, David Miller, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Case Ootes, Joe Pantalone, Michael Walker

Motion to End Debate moved by Councillor Adam Giambrone (Carried)

That in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 27, Council Procedures, Council end the debate on this Item and take the vote immediately.  (This procedural motion requires a two-thirds vote to carry.)

Vote (End Debate) Jul-08-2010 10:25 AM

Result: Carried Two-Thirds Required - PG39.9 - Giambrone - End debate
Total members that voted Yes: 20 Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Shelley Carroll, Glenn De Baeremaeker, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Adam Giambrone, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Pam McConnell, Peter Milczyn, Howard Moscoe, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, Gord Perks, Kyle Rae, Bill Saundercook, Michael Thompson, Adam Vaughan
Total members that voted No: 8 Members that voted No are Brian Ashton, Sandra Bussin (Chair), Janet Davis, Doug Holyday, Cliff Jenkins, Anthony Perruzza, David Shiner, Karen Stintz
Total members that were Absent: 17 Members that were absent are Raymond Cho, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Mike Feldman, Rob Ford, Mark Grimes, Suzan Hall, A.A. Heaps, Norman Kelly, Giorgio Mammoliti, Joe Mihevc, David Miller, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Case Ootes, Joe Pantalone, Michael Walker

Motion to Adopt Item as Amended (Carried)

Vote (Adopt Item as Amended) Jul-08-2010 10:28 AM

Result: Carried Majority Required - PG39.9 - Adopt the Item, as amended
Total members that voted Yes: 23 Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Brian Ashton, Maria Augimeri, Shelley Carroll, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Paula Fletcher, Adam Giambrone, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Pam McConnell, Peter Milczyn, Howard Moscoe, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Kyle Rae, Bill Saundercook, Michael Thompson, Adam Vaughan
Total members that voted No: 6 Members that voted No are Sandra Bussin (Chair), John Filion, Cliff Jenkins, John Parker, David Shiner, Karen Stintz
Total members that were Absent: 16 Members that were absent are Raymond Cho, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Mike Feldman, Rob Ford, Mark Grimes, Suzan Hall, A.A. Heaps, Giorgio Mammoliti, Joe Mihevc, David Miller, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Case Ootes, Joe Pantalone, Michael Walker

9a - Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan - Supplementary Report

Background Information (Committee)
Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-30801.pdf

PG39.9 - Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         The Map contained in Attachment 1 of the supplementary report (June 1, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, be amended to designate the Avenue segments on Dundas Street West, between Royal York Road and the Humber River, and Bloor Street West, between the Humber River and Mimico Creek, as character areas.

 

2.         Attachment 2 of the supplementary report (June 1, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, be amended to have the remaining Avenue section on Yonge Street, north of Lawrence Avenue, designated as an Avenue, excluded from the retail study.

 

3.         Attachments 6 and 7 in the report dated May 4, 2010 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning be deleted and replaced with revised Attachments 1 and 2 in the supplementary report (June 1, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

4.         City Council request staff to use the "Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards" contained in Section 3 of the report entitled "Avenues & Mid-Rise Buildings Study (May 2010)" and appended as Attachment 5 to the report (May 4, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in the evaluation of all new and current mid-rise development proposals on the Avenues and in the implementation of future Avenue studies so that the Avenues “vision” can be realized more quickly and effectively, subject to Recommendation 8.

 

5.         The effectiveness of the Mid-Rise Performance Standards referred to in Recommendation 4 above be monitored by staff during a ‘monitoring’ period of approximately two years.

 

6.         Staff report as soon as possible, and prior to the end of the ‘monitoring’ period, respecting the implementation of the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards to the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

 

7.         The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, incorporate the following matters into the 2011 statutory 5‑Year review of the Official Plan:

 

a.         a review and potential expansion of the Avenues identified on Map 2, Urban Structure Map, of the Official Plan and their underlying Land Use Designations;

 

b.         a review of Map 4, Higher Order Transit Corridors and Map 5, Surface Transit Priority Map, in light of any changes to Map 2 and Transit City;

 

c.         a review of the Avenue policies in Section 2.2.3 of the Official Plan and identification of any Official Plan amendments required to implement the recommendations of the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study, including the future role of Avenue Studies and segment studies;

 

d.         a review of the Built Form policies of Section 3.1.2 of the Official Plan to include the creation of new policies for mid-rise buildings and public realm improvements to implement the recommendations of the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study;

 

e.         a review of policies relating to the preservation and enhancement of public lanes on the Avenues;

 

f.          a review of Secondary Plans and Site and Area Specific Policies relating to areas that overlap with Avenues to identify any appropriate amendments to implement the recommendations of the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study where necessary; and

 

g.         a review of the Housing policies of Section 3.2.1 of the Official Plan and the thresholds for demolition and conversion of rental housing units in the implementing By-law 885-2007.

 

8.         The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in considering development applications on Avenues, be directed not to apply the principles respecting Enhancement Zones as set out in the Consultants' Study and reports from the Chief Planner dated May 4, 2010 and June 1, 2010.

 

9.         The Mid-Rise Buildings Interdivisional Team maintain an ongoing role during the two year phase in period.

Origin

(May 4, 2010) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The purpose of this report is to update the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the status of the ‘Avenues and Mid-Rise Building Action Plan’.

 

The Action Plan consists of a number of components to encourage the reurbanization of Toronto’s Avenues.  It includes the Avenues & Mid-Rise Buildings Study prepared by Brook Mcllroy Planning + Urban Design/Pace Architects with E.R.A. Architects, Quadrangle Architects Limited and Urban Marketing Collaborative, and consultations with members of the Mid-Rise Buildings Interdivisional Team, various stakeholders and the public. This report provides updates on these initiatives and makes recommendations related to implementation.

 

Toronto's Avenues are an integral part of the urban fabric.  Avenues serve as social and commercial centres and are intimately linked to the identity and vitality of the neighbourhoods that surround them.  They are also part of Toronto's Official Plan growth management strategy and therefore it is important to anticipate and set the stage for an appropriate, typically mid-rise, form of development.  In the City of Toronto, mid-rise buildings are defined in relation to the adjacent street or Avenue and can rise no taller than the street ‘right-of-way’, which is generally between 4 and 11 storeys.

 

The Official Plan vision for Toronto's Avenues is one of vibrant, tree-lines streets, wide sun-lit sidewalks, framed by well designed and contextually sensitive mid-rise buildings that support an active street life by providing a variety of retail and community uses at the ground floor level.  Mid-rise buildings are an integral part of the City’s past, present and future built form and they also help to achieve the growth targets while enhancing and revitalizing existing neighbourhoods.

 

The implementation of the Avenues’ vision has been dependant on individual Avenues Studies, sixteen of which have been completed across the city to date. Even with new as-of-right zoning in those areas, there has been a slow response from the development community. A faster and more pro-active ‘Action Plan’ was deemed appropriate to put new housing and jobs close to existing transit and infrastructure.  This report, the Consultant study, the ongoing work of the Mid-Rise Building Interdivisional Team, and other related city initiatives together form the ‘Action Plan’.

 

The consultant’s Avenues & Mid-Rise Building Study provides guidance about the future built form of the Avenues through suggested Performance Standards which will provide the foundation for new zoning regulations and urban design guidelines for mid-rise buildings that respect individual characteristics.

 

This report recommends that staff use the Mid-Rise Performance Standards in reviewing proposals for a two year monitoring period. During the monitoring period, an implementation strategy will be developed which will include a review of existing zoning, the statutory 5 year review of the Official Plan, and the new Urban Design Handbook, in order to incorporate the Performance Standards in guidelines, policies or new as-of-right zoning.

 

By the end of the two year monitoring period, staff will report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the effectiveness of the Performance Standards and potential implementation measures as appropriate and necessary.

 

Background Information

Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-30538.pdf
Performance Standards for Mid-Rise Buildings Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-30539.pdf
Performance Standards for Mid-Rise Buildings Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-30540.pdf

Communications

(May 19, 2010) E-mail from Eileen Denny, President, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (PG.Main.PG39.9.1)
(June 16, 2010) E-mail from Eileen Denny, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (PG.New.PG39.9.2)
(June 16, 2010) Letter from John R. R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault (PG.New.PG39.9.3)

Motions

1 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor John Filion (Carried)

Amend Attachment 2 of the supplementary report dated June 1, 2010 to have the remaining Avenue section on Yonge Street north of Lawrence Avenue (light blue in Att. 2) designated as an Avenue excluded from the retail study (area to be shown in grey in Att. 2).


2 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Peter Milczyn (Carried)

That the Map contained in Attachment 1 of the supplementary report (June 1, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning be revised to designate the Avenue segments on Dundas Street West between Royal York Road and the Humber River and Bloor Street West between the Humber River and Mimico Creek as character areas.


3 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor John Filion (Carried)

That Recommendation 5 of the report (June 1, 2010) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning be deleted and that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in considering development applications on Avenues, be directed not to apply the principals respecting Enhancement Zones as set out in the Consultants report and reports from the Chief Planner dated May 4, 2010 and June 1, 2010.


4 - Motion to Adopt Item as Amended moved by Councillor John Filion (Carried)

5 - Motion to Defer Item moved by Councillor Adam Vaughan (Lost)
That consideration of the item be deferred so that staff can include the Avenues and Mid Rise Buildings Study Action in the review of the Official Plan and to bring forward the recommendations as part of a comprehensive City-wide process.

6 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Norman Kelly (Redundant)

That Recommendation 5 of the supplementary report (June 1, 2010 from the Chief Planner be amended to insert after the word "criteria" the words "involving Community Councils" so that the Recommendation now reads:

 

"5.        The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning develop a process and criteria - involving Community Councils -for indentifying Avenues or portions of Avenues where further study is needed to determine if Enhancement Zones or other appropriate solutions or applications should be considered."

9a - Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan - Supplementary Report

Origin
(June 1, 2010) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
Summary

On May19, 2010, the Planning and Growth Management Committee deferred the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The report dated May 4, 2010, included the Avenues & Mid-Rise Buildings Study prepared by a consultant team led by Brook Mcllroy Planning + Urban Design/Pace Architects. The report recommended that staff use the Performance Standards for Mid-Rise Buildings contained in Section 3 of the Consultant’s Study when reviewing mid-rise building proposals for a two-year monitoring period and identified matters that should be incorporated into the 2011 statutory five-year review of the Official Plan. 

 

This supplementary report responds to recommendations made by the Planning and Growth Management Committee on May 19, 2010, that the study should emphasize the stability of neighbourhoods and recommends that Recommendation 5 included in the May 4, 2010 report be amended to provide Community Council greater control over the potential use of Enhancements Zones on the Avenues.  This report also recommends that Attachments 6 and 7 of the May 4, 2010 report be replaced with the updated Attachments 1 and 2 in this report.

Background Information
Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Study and Action Plan - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2010/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-30801.pdf
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council