Item - 2012.EX15.14
Tracking Status
- This item was considered by Executive Committee on January 24, 2012. The Executive Committee postponed consideration of this item. Consult the text of the decision for further information on the deferral.
EX15.14 - Request to protect City of Toronto interests and existing powers in any trade agreement signed between the Government of Canada and the European Union - Motion MM14.14 referred by City Council on November 29, 2011
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
Committee Decision
The Executive Committee deferred consideration of the item until its meeting on February 13, 2012 and requested the City Manager to report at that time on the status of the negotiations between the Government of Canada and the European Union and the implications for Toronto of the proposed Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).
Origin
Summary
The Government of Canada and the European Union are negotiating a Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) with participation from the Province of Ontario, other provinces and territories.
This agreement has far reaching implications for City procurement policies and could negatively affect City initiatives such as: supporting Woodbine Live, promoting local jobs, creating financial incentives for the film industry or development industry to invest in Toronto, or to use public spending as a tool for economic development, environmental protection or to support small businesses.
Trade negotiators are proposing, under the CETA, a dispute resolution mechanism that could utilize a private tribunal, which could have the authority to impose fines with no right of appeal as opposed to the open and transparent provincial court system currently in use.
In the CETA, Canada has exchanged an initial procurement offer with the EU (listing sub-federal entities that will be bound by the rules of the procurement chapter) that may include the City of Toronto and that would explicitly tie the City, for the first time, to the terms and conditions of an international trade agreement.
The EU is insisting on full access to procurement by municipalities, school boards, universities, hospitals, utilities and other provincial agencies, which may include the City of Toronto.
The Union of British Columbia Municipalities (representing 150 municipalities) along with over 20 other municipalities across the country have asked their provincial and federal governments to ensure their existing rights are protected under any new trade agreement and that they be excluded from the CETA.
(Submitted to City Council on November 29. 30 and December 1, 2011 as MM14.14)
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2012/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-44378.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2012/ex/comm/communicationfile-27857.pdf
(December 19, 2011) E-mail from Brian McHattie, Councillor Ward 1, Chedoke-Cootes, City of Hamilton forwarding approved City of Hamilton Council Motion regarding "Canada - European Community Free Trade Agreement - Impact on City of Hamilton (EX.New.EX15.14.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2012/ex/comm/communicationfile-28189.pdf
(January 23, 2012) E-mail from James Nugent (EX.New.EX15.14.3)
(January 24, 2012) E-mail from Krya Bell-Pasht, Canadian Environmental Law Association (EX.New.EX15.14.4)
(January 24, 2012) Submission from Councillor Pam McConnell forwarding Federation of Canadian Municipalities' (FCM) Backgrounder titled, "Protecting Municipal Interest in International Trade Agreements", and attaching a communication dated August 23, 2011, from The Honourable Ed Fast, P.C., M.P., Minister of International Trade and Minister for the Asia-Pacific Gateway addressed to the President of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (EX.New.EX15.14.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2012/ex/comm/communicationfile-28218.pdf
(May 26, 2010) Letter from Steven Shrybman, Sack Goldblatt, Mitchell LLP addressed to the Executive Director, Columbia Institute Centre for Civic Governance (CETA) (EX.New.EX15.14.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2012/ex/comm/communicationfile-28247.pdf