Item - 2015.EX6.12

Tracking Status

  • City Council adopted this item on June 10, 2015 without amendments.
  • This item was considered by the Executive Committee on May 26, 2015 and adopted without amendment. It will be considered by City Council on June 10, 2015.
  • See also BU8.3

EX6.12 - Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Adopted
Wards:
All

City Council Decision

City Council on June 10, 11 and 12, 2015, adopted the following:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (April 23, 2015) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer for information.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 23, 2015) Report and Appendices A - E from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-80087.pdf

Motions (City Council)

Motion to Adopt Item (Carried)

Declared Interests (City Council)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor James Pasternak - as his spouse works for the Toronto Public Library.

12a - Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

Background Information (Committee)
(May 19, 2015) Letter from the Budget Committee on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-80267.pdf

EX6.12 - Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Adopted
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (April 23, 2015) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer for information.

Origin

(April 23, 2015) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto's operating variance for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the disposition of the 2014 year-end surplus.

 

The preliminary 2014 year-end operating position for Tax Supported Operations has resulted in a net favourable variance of $190.592 million which is available for distribution after Council directions and legislative requirements are met.  The surplus represents just under 2 percent of the gross tax-supported budget.

 

Consistent with City Council's approved Surplus Management Policy, at least 75 percent or $142.944 million and an additional contribution of $12.000 million from the Toronto Transit Commission will be allocated to the Capital Financing Reserve and $35.648 million will be allocated to underfunded liabilities and/or reserve funds.  Effectively, all of the Toronto Transit Commission surplus is being directed to capital which will enable the City to fund, in part, a portion of the cost over runs for the TYSSE project.

 

In addition, $29.803 million of the 2014 surplus will be used to reduce the debt requirements related to the loss of the Toronto Pooling Compensation grant. The amount of short term borrowing will now be cut almost in half from the approved $61 million in the 2015 Budget.

 

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2014, Tax Supported Operations are summarized in Table 1 below.

 

Table 1

Tax Supported Variance Summary ($ Millions)

 

 

Year-End 2014

 

 

Over/(Under)

 

 

 

$

%

 

 

Gross Expenditures

(307.0)

-3.2%

 

 

Revenues

(88.1)

-1.5%

 

 

Net Expenditures

(218.9)

-5.8%

 

 

Council Direction/Legislative Requirements

28.3

0.8%

 

 

Surplus Available for Distribution

(190.6)

-5.1%

 

 

Under-spending was driven largely by:

 

- Lower than budgeted Toronto Transit Commission Conventional Services' expenditures such as healthcare benefits, maintenance costs for subway infrastructure, facilities and streetcars, fuel costs and accident claims;

 

- Lower than budgeted Tax Deficiencies (i.e. write-offs from assessment appeals);

 

- A lower than budgeted caseload for Toronto Employment and Social Services; and,

 

- Under-spending in purchased child care for Children's Services.

 

In addition, higher than budgeted revenue realized from permit applications for Toronto Building, Payment in Lieu of Taxes, Parking Tag Enforcement and Operations and the Municipal Land Transfer Tax contributed to the favourable net variance.  Court Services ended 2014 with a net deficit of $21.673 million due to lower traffic ticket issuance and resulting fine revenues.

 

Rate Supported Programs reported a year-end net favourable variance of $16.409 million.

  

Table 2 below summarizes Rate Supported Program net variances:

 

Table 2

Rate Supported Variance Summary ($ Millions)

 

 

 

Year-End 2014

 

 

 

 

 Over/(Under)

 

 

Solid Waste Management Services

(15.0)

 

 

Toronto Parking Authority

4.1

 

 

Toronto Water

(5.4)

 

 

Total Variance

 

(16.4)

 

 

 

The year-end favourable net variance of $16.409 million was driven by Solid Waste Management Services' net under-spending of $15.044 million, primarily due to:

 

- Over-achieved revenues of $7.240 million mainly from increased funding for the Blue Box program, higher tonnage for Toronto waste disposal at the Green Land landfill, and tipping fees from higher tonnes at transfer stations.

 

 - Lower gross expenditures of $7.804 million due largely to under-spending in salaries and benefits, savings from capital financing as a result of delayed issuance of debt and scheduling of debt charges, and reduced alternate landfill disposal costs as more tonnes of residual waste were transferred to Green Lane.

 

Toronto Water reported a favourable net variance of $5.443 million as at December 31, 2014.

 

- Gross expenditures were under-spent by $10.112 million or 1.0 percent largely due to lower salaries and benefits.

 

- Under-achieved revenues of $4.669 million were primarily from a decrease in the volume of water sales.

 

Toronto Parking Authority experienced lower than expected net revenue of $4.078 million or 6.5 percent driven largely from increased road work City wide combined with the large number of snow days experienced from January and February and City events.  The Toronto Parking Authority still recorded positive Net Revenues of over $58.2 million for 2014.

 

Table 3 below summarizes the staff vacancy rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

 

Table 3

Summary of Approved Complement

(Includes Capital and Operating Positions)

 

 

 

Vacancy percent

Budgeted Gapping

Vacancy After Gapping

 

 

 

 

City Operations

5.2%

2.3%

2.9%

 

Agencies

3.6%

2.7%

1.0%

 

Corporate Accounts

-1.3%

0.0%

0.0%

 

Total Levy Operations

4.3%

2.5%

1.8%

 

Rate Supported Programs

9.4%

2.3%

7.1%

 

Grand Total

4.6%

2.5%

2.1%

 

For the year-end, the City recorded a vacancy rate of 2.1 percent after budgeted gapping for an approved complement of 52,808.1 positions.  A more detailed analysis is provided in the Approved Complement Section of this report.

Background Information

(April 23, 2015) Report and Appendices A - E from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-80087.pdf

Motions

1 - Motion to Adopt Item moved by Mayor John Tory (Carried)

Declared Interests

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor James Pasternak - as it pertains to the Operating Variance for Toronto Public Library as his spouse is an employee.

12a - Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2014

Origin
(May 19, 2015) Letter from the Budget Committee
Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto's operating variance for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the disposition of the 2014 year-end surplus.

 

The preliminary 2014 year-end operating position for Tax Supported Operations has resulted in a net favourable variance of $190.592 million which is available for distribution after Council directions and legislative requirements are met. The surplus represents just under 2 percent of the gross tax-supported budget.

 

Consistent with City Council's approved Surplus Management Policy, at least 75 percent or $142.944 million and an additional contribution of $12.000 million from the Toronto Transit Commission will be allocated to the Capital Financing Reserve and $35.648 million will be allocated to underfunded liabilities and/or reserve funds. Effectively, all of the Toronto Transit Commission surplus is being directed to capital which will enable the City to fund, in part, a portion of the cost over runs for the TYSSE project.

 

In addition, $29.803 million of the 2014 surplus will be used to reduce the debt requirements related to the loss of the Toronto Pooling Compensation grant. The amount of short term borrowing will now be cut almost in half from the approved $61 million in the 2015 Budget.

 

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2014, Tax Supported Operations are summarized in Table 1 below.

 

Table 1

Tax Supported Variance Summary ($ Millions)

Year-End 2014

Over/(Under)

$

%

Gross Expenditures

(307.0)

-3.2%

Revenues

(88.1)

-1.5%

Net Expenditures

(218.9)

-5.8%

Council Direction/Legislative Requirements

28.3

0.8%

Surplus Available for Distribution

(190.6)

-5.1%

 

Under-spending was driven largely by:

 

- Lower than budgeted Toronto Transit Commission Conventional Services' expenditures such as healthcare benefits, maintenance costs for subway infrastructure, facilities and streetcars, fuel costs and accident claims;

 

- Lower than budgeted Tax Deficiencies (i.e. write-offs from assessment appeals);

 

- A lower than budgeted caseload for Toronto Employment and Social Services; and,

 

- Under-spending in purchased child care for Children's Services.

 

In addition, higher than budgeted revenue realized from permit applications for Toronto Building, Payment in Lieu of Taxes, Parking Tag Enforcement and Operations and the Municipal Land Transfer Tax contributed to the favourable net variance. Court Services ended 2014 with a net deficit of $21.673 million due to lower traffic ticket issuance and resulting fine revenues.

 

Rate Supported Programs reported a year-end net favourable variance of $16.409 million.

 

Table 2 below summarizes Rate Supported Program net variances:

 

Table 2

Rate Supported Variance Summary ($ Millions)

Year-End 2014

Over/(Under)

Solid Waste Management Services

(15.0)

Toronto Parking Authority

4.1

Toronto Water

(5.4)

Total Variance

(16.4)

 

The year-end favourable net variance of $16.409 million was driven by Solid Waste Management Services' net under-spending of $15.044 million, primarily due to:

 

- Over-achieved revenues of $7.240 million mainly from increased funding for the Blue Box program, higher tonnage for Toronto waste disposal at the Green Land landfill, and tipping fees from higher tonnes at transfer stations.

 

- Lower gross expenditures of $7.804 million due largely to under-spending in salaries and benefits, savings from capital financing as a result of delayed issuance of debt and scheduling of debt charges, and reduced alternate landfill disposal costs as more tonnes of residual waste were transferred to Green Lane.

 

Toronto Water reported a favourable net variance of $5.443 million as at December 31, 2014.

 

- Gross expenditures were under-spent by $10.112 million or 1.0 percent largely due to lower salaries and benefits.

 

- Under-achieved revenues of $4.669 million were primarily from a decrease in the volume of water sales.

 

Toronto Parking Authority experienced lower than expected net revenue of $4.078 million or 6.5 percent driven largely from increased road work City wide combined with the large number of snow days experienced from January and February and City events. The Toronto Parking Authority still recorded positive Net Revenues of over $58.2 million for 2014.

 

Table 3 below summarizes the staff vacancy rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2014.

 

Table 3

Summary of Approved Complement

(Includes Capital and Operating Positions)

Vacancy percent

Budgeted Gapping

Vacancy After Gapping

City Operations

5.2%

2.3%

2.9%

Agencies

3.6%

2.7%

1.0%

Corporate Accounts

-1.3%

0.0%

0.0%

Total Levy Operations

4.3%

2.5%

1.8%

Rate Supported Programs

9.4%

2.3%

7.1%

Grand Total

4.6%

2.5%

2.1%

 

For the year-end, the City recorded a vacancy rate of 2.1 percent after budgeted gapping for an approved complement of 52,808.1 positions. A more detailed analysis is provided in the Approved Complement Section of this report.

Background Information
(May 19, 2015) Letter from the Budget Committee on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-80267.pdf
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council