Executive Committee

Meeting No.:
41
Contact:
Kelly McCarthy, Committee Administrator
Meeting Date:
Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Phone:
416-392-4666
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
exc@toronto.ca
Location:
Committee Room 1, City Hall
Chair:
Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

Executive Committee

Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly (Chair)

Councillor David Shiner (Vice-Chair)

Councillor Gary Crawford

Councillor Vince Crisanti

Councillor Frank Di Giorgio

Mayor Rob Ford

Councillor Peter Leon

Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti

Councillor Peter Milczyn

Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong Councillor Cesar Palacio

Councillor Anthony Perruzza

Councillor Michael Thompson

 

Members of Council and Staff: Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended.

 

Special Assistance for Members of the Public: City staff can arrange for special assistance with some advance notice. If you need special assistance, please call (416-392-4666), TTY 416-338-0889 or e-mail (exc@toronto.ca).

 

Closed Meeting Requirements: If the Executive Committee wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of the committee must make a motion to do so and give the reason why the Committee has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

Notice to People Writing or making presentations to the Executive Committee: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees. The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City's website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it - such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address - available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City makes a video record of committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video-recording you and City staff may make the video record available to the public.

 

If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or by calling 416-392-4666.  


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

 

 

 

Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.

 

Confirmation of Minutes – March 19, 2014 and March 25, 2014

 

Speakers/Presentations - A complete list will be distributed at the meeting.

 

Communications/Reports 

EX41.1 - Rehabilitation of Western Channel Dockwall

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Origin

(April 7, 2014) Report from the City Manager

Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct staff  to establish a capital project for the rehabilitation of the dockwall along the north side of the Western Channel, in the Facilities Management Capital Budget for consideration as part of the 2015 Budget process, which will include rehabilitation of:

 

a.         Area 1 at a cost of $4.5 million to be funded as follows: $1.5 million City share as a contribution from the Toronto Port Lands Company; and $1.5 million from the Government of Canada and $1.5M from the Province of Ontario;

 

b.         Area 2 at a cost of $1.5 million to be fully funded by the City of Toronto through a contribution from the Toronto Port Lands Company; and

 

c.         Area 3 at a cost of $0.5 million  to be funded by a contribution from the Toronto Port Authority.

 

2.         City Council direct the Toronto Port Lands Company to declare a special dividend, $1.5 million in 2014, $1.5 million in 2015, for rehabilitation of the dockwall in Areas 1 and 2.

 

3.         City Council request the Government of Canada to contribute one-third ($1.5 million) towards the Area 1 dockwall rehabilitation project under an infrastructure funding program (i.e. the Building Canada Fund – Provincial-Territorial Component or a similar fund), request the Province of Ontario to contribute a matching one-third ($1.5 million) towards the project, and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into funding agreements.

 

4.         City Council request the Toronto Port Authority to contribute $0.5 million for the rehabilitation of the dockwall in Area 3 in order to realize project efficiencies and reduce overall costs, and authorize the City Manager to negotiate and enter into any required agreements.

 

5.         City Council request the Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario to transfer ownership of the dockwall structure and related lands adjacent to the Canada Malting site (Area 1) to the City of Toronto upon completion of the dockwall rehabilitation project, and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to enter into any required agreements

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to request Federal Provincial, and Toronto Port Authority funding, in partnership with the City of Toronto, to rehabilitate a portion of a dockwall adjacent to the Canada Malting lands, and to seek direction to allocate funding for rehabilitation of additional sections of the same dockwall.

 

When completed, this project will extend the life of the dockwall structure, continue the Portland Slip promenade constructed by Waterfront Toronto from the eastern edge of the Canada Malting lands over to Eireann Quay, improve access to the Ireland Park and consolidate ownership of the dockwall to the City of Toronto.

 

The subject dockwall extends from the south-east corner of the Canada Malting lands forming the north wall of the Western Channel to Lake Ontario. The sections of the dockwall that are in need of rehabilitation can be described as within four areas detailed below.  Ownership of the dockwall rests primarily with the City of Toronto with the exception of Area 1.

 

Area 1:  Located between the south-east corner of the Canada Malting lands extending west to Eireann Quay. This section is located along the southern edge of the Canada Malting lands. There is no record of ownership for this area and, as such, it is referred to as “unpatented land”. As a matter of law, ownership of unpatented land rests with either the Federal or Provincial government. This section is 141 metres in length and includes the return wall to the new Portland Slip dockwall.

 

Area 2:  Located between the east side of Eireann Quay and the Toronto Port Authority (TPA) ferry slip. This section is owned by the City of Toronto. In 2011, the City granted an easement to the TPA to permit the construction of the Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (BBTCA) pedestrian tunnel under the dockwall. This section is 53 metres in length

 

Area 3:  Consists of the east and west corners of the BBTCA ferry slip and is owned by the City of Toronto. The TPA owns and operates the ferry slip to the BBTCA.

 

Area 4:  Located south of the east-west section of Stadium Road and is owned by the City of Toronto. This section is 197 metres in length.

 

(see Map in the report (April 7, 2014) from the City Manager)

 

Due to concerns raised by the Ireland Park Foundation about the condition and structural integrity of the dockwall, particularly the section in Area 1, City staff undertook, with agreement from the Federal and Provincial governments, an engineering assessment for the northern edge of the Western Channel to determine the condition of the dockwall and to develop an approach for rehabilitation.  This assessment was conducted by WSP Canada Inc. (formerly Genivar) in 2013.

 

The engineering assessment confirmed that the structure is sound, however, encapsulation and rehabilitation of the concrete cap is necessary to prevent further deterioration.

The estimated cost to rehabilitate the dockwall is as follows:

 

Location

Length

Estimated Cost

Area 1

142 metres

$4.5 million

Area 2

53 metres

$1.5 million

Area 3

Corners of TPA Ferry Slip

$0.5 million

Area 4

197 metres

$5.5 million

 

In 2006, a section of the dockwall further west (at the entrance to the Western Channel) collapsed resulting in litigation to determine who was responsible for its repair. In order to resolve the issue, the three orders of government, the Toronto Port Authority, and the City's tenant on adjacent lands agreed to share the cost of repairing the collapsed dockwall with the City taking ownership of the rehabilitated structure once it was completed to the City's satisfaction.

 

The City is the owner of the Canada Malting lands; however, the City's ownership does not extend south to the water's edge of the Western Channel. It is in the interest of the City to assume ownership of the lands occupied by the dockwall in order to secure public access from the Canada Malting lands to the water's edge.

 

This report proposes to seek a cost sharing agreement with the Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario for the rehabilitation of Area 1, to secure funding for the City's contribution to the rehabilitation of Area 1 and the full cost of Area 2 from the Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC, a City-owned subsidiary), and to secure funding for the rehabilitation of Area 3 from the Toronto Port Authority. Area 4 also requires rehabilitation but is not proposed to be included in the project at this time.

Financial Impact

The total cost to complete this Western Channel Dockwall Rehabilitation project is $6.5 million. Staff are proposing that the rehabilitation costs be funded between the Government of Canada, the Province of Ontario, the City of Toronto (TPLC) and the Toronto Port Authority. Assuming an agreement on cost-sharing by all orders of government , the total cost to the City will be approximately $3.0 million to be funded by TPLC. TPLC currently owns and manages dockwall in the Port Lands, along the Keating Channel and adjacent to Redpath Sugar.  Staff have confirmed that TPLC is able to fund the City's $3 million contribution to the dockwall rehabilitation from their 2014 and 2015 budget years.

 

Location

Length

Estimated Cost

Proposed Funding Source(s)

Area 1

142 metres

$4.5 million

Cost sharing agreement between Government of Canada - $1.5 million, Province of Ontario - $1.5 million and City of Toronto (TPLC) - $1.5 million

Area 2

53 metres

$1.5 million

City of Toronto (TPLC)

Area 3

Corners of TPA Ferry Slip

$0.5 million

Toronto Port Authority

 

Only Area 1 will be subject to a cost-sharing agreement between the three orders of government. If the cost was shared equally, each government would be responsible for a $1.5 million contribution.  Construction will only occur once all funds are received from the federal and provincial partners to the cost-sharing agreement.

 

Upon completion of the rehabilitation of Area 1, ownership of the structure will transfer to the City. The City will be responsible for ongoing maintenance and repairs of the structure which are expected to be minor as the dockwall will be rehabilitated.  The City already has responsibility for maintenance of the dockwall in Areas 2, 3 and 4.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(April 7, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the City Manager on Rehabilitation of Western Channel Dockwall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68387.pdf

Communications

(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Robert Kearns (EX.New.EX41.1.1)

EX41.2 - Metrolinx Rapid Transit Program - Allocation of the Public Realm Amount

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager, Cluster B recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request Metrolinx to allocate the total Public Realm Amount (PRA) among the Eglinton, Sheppard and Finch rapid transit lines in proportion to the length of each line.

 

2.         City Council request Metrolinx to amend its current RFP for the Eglinton rapid transit project to include instructions to bidders to provide, as an evaluated element within the base scope of the project, as many of the following public realm improvements along Eglinton Avenue as are possible using the Public Realm Amount budget allocated to the project, in the following order of priority, and to provide a right to the City to determine whether to proceed with the public realm improvements proposed by the winning bidder: 

 

i.          Provision of streetscape elements identified in the approved Eglinton Environmental Assessment that exceed current City standards within the underground station reconstruction zones; 

 

ii.         Provision and maintenance of green trackway elements, comprising vegetation and ancillary features (e.g., drainage), along the portion of the LRT trackway between Victoria Park Avenue and Birchmount Road, where feasible and not precluded by the requirements for emergency vehicle access;

 

iii.        Provision of a protective feature to buffer on-street bicycle lanes from vehicle traffic lanes, that meets all of the following requirements:

 

a.         the section of bicycle lane provided with the protective feature comprises a minimum of three continuous kilometres along one side of the street, notwithstanding intersections and bridges;

 

b.         the section of bicycle lane provided with the protective feature is located between Brentcliffe Road and Victoria Park Avenue; and

 

c.         the protective feature (painted strip, rumble strip, etc.) is acceptable to the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Fire Chief/General Manager of Toronto Fire Services.

 

iv.        Provision of new or improved pedestrian and bicycle connections and entrances to Serena Gundy Park and Ernest Thompson Seton Park from Eglinton Avenue or Leslie Street in the vicinity of the Leslie LRT Stop;

 

v.         Construction of the approved Eglinton EA streetscape between the reconstruction zones at Avenue Road Station and Yonge-Eglinton Station to create a continuous length of approved EA streetscape on Eglinton Avenue from Avenue Road to Yonge Street; and

 

vi.        That any unused balance of the Public Realm Amount fund allocated to the Eglinton LRT after provision has been made for the five priority projects listed in i) through v) inclusive, be committed to projects included in the following list:

a.         Provision and maintenance of green trackway elements, comprising vegetation and ancillary uses (e.g., drainage), along the surface portion of the LRT trackway in locations that are not already specified;

 

b.         Provision of a protective feature to buffer on-street bicycle lanes from vehicle traffic lanes, along the surface portion of the LRT trackway where it is not already provided in the base scope of construction of the transit project; and

 

c.         Provision of new or improved pedestrian and bicycle connections and entrances to parks, ravines and public open spaces adjacent to the transit project in locations that are not already specified.  

 

3.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, in consultation with the Director, Major Capital Infrastructure Coordination and Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, for the Eglinton rapid transit project:

 

i.          to assist Metrolinx in developing the instructions to bidders and appropriate evaluation scoring;

 

ii.         to participate in the evaluation of the bids;

 

iii.        to determine whether the winning bidder's Public Realm Amount submission is fair and reasonable and provides good value to the City for the Public Realm Amount, and on that basis to determine whether to accept the winning bidder's Public Realm Amount proposal; and

 

iv.        if the determination is made to not accept the winning bidder's Public Realm Amount proposal, to negotiate alternative public realm improvements with Metrolinx that are consistent with the recommendations of this report.

 

4.         If the determination is made to accept the winning bidder's Public Realm Amount proposal for the Eglinton rapid transit project, City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to negotiate and enter into any agreements, amendments and renewals with Metrolinx as may be necessary, in accordance with the Master Agreement and the recommendations of this report, in respect of the use of the PRA in accordance with the winning bidder's submission.

 

5.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the Director, Major Capital Infrastructure Coordination to report to City Council on a priority list of projects for the Sheppard and Finch LRTs in a timely manner.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to receive direction from City Council on the recommended allocation of the Public Realm Amount that is funded by Metrolinx out of its capital budget for construction of the Rapid Transit Program. (Attachment 1)

The Master Agreement between the City, TTC and Metrolinx (executed in November 2012) prescribes the role of each party to plan, design and construct the Rapid Transit Program. As set out in the Master Agreement, Metrolinx is required to replace and restore the City's infrastructure, streetscape and public realm to City standards if those assets are disrupted by the Rapid Transit Program. 

The Master Agreement also provides for a Public Realm Amount (the "PRA") that will be used by Metrolinx to plan, design and construct discretionary improvements to the streetscape requested by the City. The discretionary improvements may exceed City standards or comprise new features, provided the improvements are located in the immediate vicinity of underground stations or along the at-grade sections of the transit corridors.

The Master Agreement defines the value of the Public Realm Amount as equivalent to 1.5% of the total construction cost of the Rapid Transit Program as defined in the Master Agreement, less certain deductions, including $10 million that Metrolinx intends to use for public amenities on Metrolinx property at the underground stations. The balance of the Public Realm Amount will have an aggregate value that may exceed $70 million.

 

This report recommends that the Public Realm Amount be allocated to streetscape and public realm improvements on Eglinton, Sheppard and Finch proportionally, based on the length of the respective transit lines.

Furthermore, the report advises City Council that it is appropriate and desirable for the Public Realm Amount be invested in streetscape and public realm improvements that can have a significant impact on the City as a whole, that can be enjoyed by residents and visitors from all parts of the City and distribute the Public Realm Amount as widely as possible across the designated transit corridors. Accordingly, the recommendations contained in this report would ensure that the Public Realm Amount allocated to the Eglinton transit project is invested with a cohesive vision.

In considering appropriate uses for the Public Realm Amount that are eligible for funding by Metrolinx, City Council can be informed by the Eglinton Connects Planning Study currently nearing completion.  Fundamental themes of the Eglinton Connects Study include balancing all forms of mobility, connecting neighbourhoods and natural valley systems to the rest of the city, and creating a green, beautiful metropolitan avenue. Although they have not been recently studied, the Sheppard and Finch LRT corridors would also benefit from these goals.

 

More specifically, the Eglinton Connects Study identified five elements that could be implemented on Eglinton Avenue (and the other LRT corridors) that would help achieve its vision and recommendations, and which would be eligible for Public Realm Amount funding in accordance with the Master Agreement:

 

i.          Construction and maintenance of a "green trackway" along at-grade sections of the transit corridors;

 

ii.         Construction of a protective buffer between proposed bicycle and traffic lanes along at-grade sections of the transit corridors;

 

iii.        Construction of connections between transit stations and stops, and adjoining parks, ravines and open spaces;

 

iii.        Construction of streetscape improvements that exceed previous City standards in the reconstruction zones at the underground stations (e.g., soil cells for tree planting); and

 

iv.        Construction of the approved EA road cross-section between Avenue Road Station and Yonge-Eglinton Station. 

 

These initiatives received strong support from the public in the consultation conducted as part of the Eglinton Study.

 

Metrolinx is currently seeking competitive bids from private consortia to finance, construct and maintain the Eglinton LRT project. To ensure that bidders are informed of the City's preferred use of the Public Realm Amount and to encourage bidders to maximize the deliverables that can be constructed using the Public Realm Amount budget, it is necessary to provide Metrolinx with a list of the City's desired streetscape and public realm improvements for the Eglinton LRT project to be financed by the Public Realm Amount, and the City's prioritization of such improvements. Accordingly, this report seeks direction from City Council on the range and ranking of projects for construction up to the limit of funds available through the Public Realm Amount.   Since Metrolinx has requested the City's desired list of Public Realm Amount funded improvements by May 8, 2014, Council direction is required before that date.

 

Metrolinx, with input from the City, will determine a scoring system to objectively determine differences between the bidders in the value-for-money that will be realized from the Public Realm Amount, based on demonstrated innovation and scope of the proposed work. In general, the bidder that is committed to deliver the greatest number of items from the priority list, and in a form that is acceptable to the City, would be delivering the greatest value-for-money and will therefore be awarded the highest number of relevant points. The bidders' attention to design and creativity in their proposals will also be reflected in the scoring. This approach creates an incentive for bidders to maximize the scope and quality of the streetscape improvements to be delivered from the Public Realm Amount fund.

 

Should the Public Realm Amount-financed scope of work that is proposed by the successful bidder be judged to not deliver good value to the City (possible because use of the Public Realm Amount is only one element in the overall evaluation of bids), the City would retain the right to refuse the proposal and engage in an alternate process to allocate the Public Realm Amount.  The alternate process would be a contract variation (amendment) process that the successful bidder must follow for all scope, schedule and budget changes during the construction period.

 

This report also recommends that appropriate staff report to Council at a future time on the priority list of Public Realm Amount projects for the Sheppard and Finch LRT projects.

Financial Impact

The recommendations in this report have no financial impact.

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-7, from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on Metrolinx Rapid Transit Program - Allocation of the Public Realm Amount
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68388.pdf

EX41.3 - Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council and of Council Appointees to Agencies, Corporations and Other Bodies for the year ended December 31, 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 24, 2014) Report from the Treasurer and the City Clerk

Recommendations

The Treasurer and the City Clerk recommend that:

 

1.         The Executive Committee receive this report for information.

Summary

This report is submitted for information purposes as required under Section 223 (1) of the City of Toronto Act 2006.  It provides an itemized statement on Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council and of Council Appointees to Agencies, Corporations and Other Bodies for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications arising from this report.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(March 24, 2014) Report from the Treasurer and the City Clerk on Remuneration and Expenses of Members of Council and of Council Appointees to Agencies, Corporations and Other Bodies for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68167.pdf
(March 24, 2014) Attachment 1 - Summary of Remuneration and Expenses for Members of Council for the year ended December 31, 2013 and Appendices A, B1, B2, C, D, E, F, G, and H
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68168.pdf

Communications

(April 23, 2014) Submission from Councillor Mammoliti (EX.New.EX41.3.1)

EX41.4 - Survey Results for Elected Officials' Compensation for 2015-2018 Term of Council

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 3, 2014) Report from the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk recommends that:

 

1.         City Council taking into consideration the information contained in Attachment 1 (the comparator group study), adopt one of the following two options as required by Municipal Code Chapter 223, Article 1, Four-Year Adjustment, with regard to the compensation for the new Council:

 

Option A

 

Adjust the salary for Councillors and for Mayor to be at the 75th percentile of the comparator group in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 223-1, so that effective January 1, 2015, the compensation for Councillors is adjusted to $119,025 and that of the Mayor is adjusted to $200,013;

 

              OR

 

Option B

 

Maintain the 2014 salary level for Councillors and for the Mayor with a CPI adjustment effective January 1, 2015.

Summary

Prior to the end of a term, Council is required to establish the compensation for the new Council. This report implements the process in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 223, Remuneration for Council Members to establish the compensation for Council starting January 1, 2015.

 

In accordance with the by-law, staff retained a consultant firm to conduct a survey on the compensation for Councillors and for the Mayor in a comparator group. This report provides the survey results for Council's consideration.

 

The by-law sets the benchmark for Councillors and the Mayor's compensation at the 75th percentile of the comparator group.  Currently Councillors are at the 37th percentile and the Mayor at the 61st percentile.

Financial Impact

Option A

 

If Council chooses to adopt Option A, Councillor salary would be adjusted from $105,397 to $119,025. The cost to bring each Councillor's salary to the 75th percentile per Municipal Code Chapter 223-1 would be $13,628 or 12.9%.  Including the budgeted benefit rate of 24%, the total increase to councillor salary and benefits for 2015 would be $743,544.  This adjustment would be reflected in the City Council 2015 operating budget submission as part of the 2015 operating budget process.

 

The Mayor's salary would be adjusted from $177,499 to $200,013. The cost to bring the Mayor's salary to the 75th percentile per Municipal Code Chapter 223-1 would be $22,514 or 12.7%. Including the budgeted benefit rate of 24%, the increase to the Mayor's Office 2015 operating budget would be $27,917. This adjustment would be reflected in the Mayor's Office 2015 operating budget submission as part of the 2015 operating budget process.

 

Option B

 

If Council chooses to adopt Option B, the 2015 City Council and Mayor's Office operating budget submission will reflect a CPI adjustment to the Councillors' and the Mayor's salary. Traditionally, a 2% CPI adjustment has been used for annual budget purposes. The actual CPI increase will be determined by the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(April 3, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Survey Results for Elected Officials' Compensation for 2015-2018 term of Council
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68252.pdf
(March 12, 2014) Attachment 1 - City of Toronto 2014 Elected Officials Compensation Study by OCG Strategy and Organization Consulting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68253.pdf

Communications

(April 17, 2014) E-mail from Benedicta Colaco (EX.New.EX41.4.1)

EX41.5 - Retention of Outside Counsel for Members of Council for Freedom of Information Appeals

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Report from the City Clerk and the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Clerk and the City Solicitor recommend that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the retention of Ms. Priscilla Platt's new firm, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, to provide independent advice and representation from time to time to Members of Council in relation to any proceedings before the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario concerning access to records held by a Member of Council.

Summary

Due to the recent unexpected closing of the firm of Heenan Blaikie LLP, it is necessary to quickly make new arrangements for continued legal representation for individual Members of Council before the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario ("IPC") respecting access requests for records held by them.  After reviewing potential options, it is recommended that the firm of Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, being the firm which Ms. Priscilla Platt has now joined, be retained for the purpose of allowing individual Members of Council legal advice and representation with respect to any IPC appeal of their records.

Financial Impact

The recommended external counsel has competitive rates in keeping with the previous proposal accepted by the City.

 

The actual expenditure on outside counsel for Members of Council since 2012 is $66,663.84 and is reported annually by the City Clerk. Expenditures are paid from the Council General Expense Budget.

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Report from the City Clerk and the City Solicitor on Retention of Outside Counsel for Members of Council for Freedom of Information Appeals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68262.pdf

EX41.6 - Update on Surplus Toronto District School Board and Toronto Catholic District School Board School Board Properties

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Recommendations

The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration recommends that:

 

1.         The Executive Committee receive this report for information.

Summary

This report provides information about anticipated impacts of recently surplused Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) school properties. Five TCDSB school properties have recently been offered for sale, four of which are currently operating schools which will be relocated to new facilities and one which is the sale of a portion of land attached to a school property. This report identifies potential impacts on local community access to green space and recreational and other community facilities.

 

This report also provides information on requested reassessments of City of Toronto interest in two Toronto District School Board (TDSB) school sites: the Vincent Massey site and the Lawrence-Midland Redevelopment site.

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of the recommendations included in this report. The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Update on Surplus Toronto District School Board and Toronto Catholic District School Board School Board Properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68286.pdf
(April 4, 2014) Attachment 1 - Location Maps of Surplus Toronto Catholic District School Board and Toronto District School Board sites
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68287.pdf

EX41.7 - Proposed Government of Canada Enhancements to the Toronto Track and Field Centre

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 7, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Recommendations

The General Manager Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that, subject to receiving approval from York University for the proposed additions and renovations:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City to accept from the Department of Canadian Heritage - Sport Canada Branch, a financial contribution in the amount of approximately $5,000,000.00 for the entirety of the proposed addition and enhancements to be constructed at the City-owned Toronto Track and Field Centre, leased from York University.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City to enter into a funding agreement and any necessary ancillary agreements and documents with the Department of Canadian Heritage - Sport Canada Branch, upon terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City to enter into a project agreement and any necessary ancillary agreements and documents with the Toronto Organizing Committee for the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games and York University, in respect of the proposed additions and renovations, upon terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council authorize the Toronto Organizing Committee for the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games, as and if required, to make any necessary planning and building applications on behalf of the City in relation to the proposed additions and renovations.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City to enter into the following agreements related to the Lease with York University, as landlord, dated September 15, 1983, as amended, in respect of the Toronto Track and Field Centre, upon terms and conditions satisfactory to  the City Manager, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the City Solicitor:

 

a.          a lease amending agreement to confirm York University's consent to the construction of the proposed improvements and the entering into by the City of a sublease with the Athletics Canada in respect of proposed addition;

 

b.         a long-term sublease with Athletics Canada as subtenant in respect of the proposed addition, being approximately 12,000 square feet, as required and stipulated as a condition of the funding being provided by the Government of Canada, on the basis of nominal rent and the requirement that the subtenant to be responsible for any and all operating and capital maintenance costs together with such other terms and conditions to be negotiated; and

 

c.          such other ancillary agreements and documents as may be required to effect the intent and requirements of the Toronto Track and Field Centre project, the terms of which shall be consistent with the intent set out herein and the financial commitments approved by Council.

 

6.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto.

Summary

This report advises of a proposal from the Government of Canada - Department of Canadian Heritage, Sport Canada (“Canada”) for a fully funded high performance centre to be built as an extension to the City-owned Toronto Track and Field Centre (“TTFC”) located on the York University (“York”) campus.  This project (“Project”) is a product of discussions between Canada, the Toronto Organizing Committee for the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games (“TO2015”), Athletics Canada, York, and the City of Toronto.

 

The Toronto Track and Field Centre will undergo $3.6 million of refurbishment for its use during the 2015 Pan and Parapan American Games (“2015 Games”).  These refurbishments are being funded by Canada and the City of Toronto on a 56% and 44% basis, respectively.  In order to enhance the legacy condition of the Toronto Track and Field Centre beyond the originally agreed upon scope, Canada has agreed to increase its commitment to expand the TTFC at its sole cost of up to an additional $5 million.  As owner of the facility, authority is sought to accept this contribution.

Canada’s funding is conditional upon the City leasing space in the high performance centre to Athletics Canada for nominal rent.  Athletics Canada has committed being a tenant for 20 years and to funding all operating costs for their dedicated space together with monies to be paid to the City in respect of future capital maintenance costs.

The City owns the Toronto Track and Field Centre; however, it leases the property upon which the Toronto Track and Field Centre is built from York pursuant to a ground lease, dated September 15, 1983, but effective December 21, 1976 (the "Lease").  The lease between the City and York must be amended to allow for the proposed extension.  Authority is sought to amend the Lease with York to permit construction of the extension and the sub-tenancy in the high performance centre by Athletics Canada.  York is in agreement.

 

This matter is urgent in nature because, in order to minimize the disruption to Toronto Track and Field Centre users and to allow for project management by TO2015, Project construction must commence by August 2014, coordinated around the original 2015 Games refurbishment construction.

Financial Impact

The original capital project for the refurbishment of the Toronto Track and Field Centre for its use during the 2015 Pan and Parapan American Games (“2015 Games”) has a project cost of $3.628 million.  These refurbishments are being funded by TO2015 (Government of Canada) and the City of Toronto on a 56% and 44% basis, respectively. 

The expansion of the Toronto Track and Field Centre to build a high performance centre at additional cost of up to $5 million will be covered by the Government of Canada (see Appendix A).  In addition, Athletics Canada indicated its commitment to be a long-term sub-tenant in the high performance centre and to pay nominal rent and capital maintenance costs, as well as all operating costs that would be generated as a result of the Toronto Track and Field Centre expansion (see Appendix B).

All funds for the Project will be transferred directly from the Government of Canada to TO2015, which will manage the project and pay for all expenses from those funds.  Therefore, the Project will have no financial impacts on the City.

 

The expansion of the Toronto Track and Field Centre will not have an impact on the level of City programming delivered at the Toronto Track and Field Centre.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(April 7, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68268.pdf
(April 7, 2014) Appendix A - Letter from TO2015 Proposing Toronto Track and Field Centre Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68269.pdf
(April 4, 2014) Appendix B - Letter from Athletics Canada Supporting Toronto Track and Field Centre Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68270.pdf

EX41.8 - 2014 Education Property Tax Levy and Clawback Rate By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the following 2014 tax rates for school purposes, which will raise an education tax levy for 2014 of $1,999,252,981:

 

Column I

Column II

Property Class

2014 Tax Rate for Education  Levy

 Residential

0.203000%

 Multi-Residential

0.203000%

 New Multi-Residential

0.203000%

 Commercial

1.292138%

 Commercial (New Construction)

1.220000%

 Residual Commercial (New Construction)

1.220000%

 Industrial

1.339989%

 Industrial (New Construction)

1.220000%

 Pipelines

1.531874%

 Farmlands

0.050800%

 Managed Forests

0.050800%

 

2.         City Council enact a by-law for the 2014 taxation year to reduce tax decreases for the 2014 taxation year on properties in the commercial, industrial and multi-residential property classes by the percentage of the tax decrease set out in Column II in order to recover the revenues foregone as a result of capping:

 

Column I

Column II

Column III

(Property Class)

(Clawback

Percentage)

(Allowable

Decrease)

Commercial

69.680133%

30.319867%

Industrial

61.262516%

38.737484%

Multi-residential

23.722567%

76.277433%

 

3.         Authority be granted for the introduction of the necessary bills in Council to give effect hereto.

Summary

This report recommends adoption of the 2014 education tax rates and property tax levy for school purposes for the City of Toronto as prescribed by regulation by the Minister of Finance.  This report also recommends the 2014 percentage of the tax decreases (the 'clawback' rates) required to recover the revenues foregone as a result of the cap limit on properties in the commercial, industrial and multi-residential property classes, as provided for by legislation.

Financial Impact

The City is required by legislation to levy and collect property taxes for school purposes at the tax rates prescribed by the Minister of Finance.  The 2014 education levy is $1,999,252,981, of which $8,147,478 is to be retained by the City pursuant to Ontario Regulation No. 121/07.  The average household assessed at $499,521 in 2014 will pay education taxes of $1,014.03, compared to $1,005.66 in 2013 which represents an increase of 0.83%.

 

There is also no direct financial implication to the City of Toronto arising from the clawback rates recommended in this report.  The foregone revenue resulting from the legislated limit on Current Value Assessment (CVA) related tax increase (5% cap) for the commercial, industrial and multi-residential property tax classes is funded by withholding (clawing-back) a portion of the decrease that would otherwise be recognized within each class, with no budgetary funding implications for the City.

Background Information

(April 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on 2014 Education Property Tax Levy and Clawback Rate By-Law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68379.pdf

EX41.9 - City of Toronto 2013 Investment Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

This report provides a review of the annual returns realized in 2013 on the funds invested in the City's portfolios. In 2013, the City's investment portfolio of $4.6 billion earned $142.3 million and yielded a return of approximately 3.10%.  These portfolios hold the City's working capital and the amounts designated for the City's reserves and reserve funds.  The investment results for other funds, such as sinking, pension and trust funds are reported on separately.

 

In compliance with Ontario Regulation 610/06 Financial Activities of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, a record of each transaction in the City's own securities is listed in this report.

 

Under Ontario legislation, municipalities are not permitted to invest in equities as funds must be invested in either short-term money market fixed income securities or long-term bonds.

Financial Impact

In 2013, investment earnings on the City’s managed funds totalled $142.3 million.  The earnings were allocated to the operating budget ($120.2 million) and reserve funds ($22.1 million) according to the Council approved interest allocation policy. 

 

The operating budget component was under the budgeted revenues in the Non-Program account by $1.5 million.  This variance was primarily due to persistently low short-term interest rates and weaker than forecasted mid-and long-term rates.

 

The investment activities conducted by staff in 2013 were in compliance with the investment policies and goals adopted by City Council.

Background Information

(April 7, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on City of Toronto 2013 Investment Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68288.pdf

EX41.10 - Annual Report on City's Loan and Loan Guarantee Portfolio

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board

Origin

(April 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the renewal of the following line of credits and capital loan guarantees:

 

            a.         The line of credit guarantee issued on behalf of the Canadian Stage Company (CanStage) to its financial institution in the amount of $730,000 (inclusive of all interest payable by CanStage), be renewed for a three year period commencing on November 1, 2014 and ending October 31, 2017;

 

            b.         The line of credit guarantee on behalf of the Young People's Theatre (YPT) in the amount of $175,000 (inclusive of all interest payable by YPT), be renewed for a three year period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending December 31, 2017;

 

            c.         The capital loan guarantee on behalf of the Toronto Artscape Inc. (Artscape) in respect of the Distillery District Studios Project in an amount not to exceed $167,510 (inclusive of all interest payable by Artscape), be renewed for a three year period commencing on November 1, 2014 and ending October 31, 2017; and

 

            d.         The capital loan guarantee on behalf of the Toronto Artscape Inc. in respect of the Wychwood Barns Project in an amount not to exceed $2,979,538 (inclusive of all interest payable by Artscape), be renewed for a three year period commencing on June 16, 2014 and ending June 15, 2017.

 

2.         The City's Capital Loan Guarantee Policy and Direct City Loan Policy, as adopted by City Council on May 7, 2013, be amended to require that any capital fundraising plan proposed in respect of debt repayment for any new project for which a loan or loan guarantee is being sought include a plan for repayment of the loan amount by alternate means should fundraising prove to be insufficient to repay the loan, such plan to be to the satisfaction of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

3.         City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1 – Confidential Information.

 

4.         City Council not authorize the public release of Attachment 1 – Confidential Information, as this attachment contains confidential information relating to litigation or potential litigation that could affect the City, until such time that the necessary agreements have been executed.

Summary

This report provides an annual update on the City's loan and loan guarantee portfolio. 

 

The City currently guarantees three operating lines of credit and eight capital loans under Council approved policies for line of credit and loan guarantees for cultural and community-based organizations.  In addition to the guarantees, the City provides seven direct loans to City agencies and corporations, and one to an external organization.  Three capital loans with a City guarantee provided to not-for-profit organizations were successfully paid in full during 2013 in the combined amount of $6.6 million.  Another capital loan to BIXI in the amount of $3.65 million which was guaranteed by the City was repaid by the City and funded through revenues from the Astral Street Furniture contract.

 

This report recommends an extension of two line of credit guarantees which would otherwise expire at the end of 2014. These lines of credit are in good standing, and the organizations have achieved a reduction in their line of credit requirement.  This report also recommends term extensions to two capital loan guarantees, which are also in good standing.  Another organization with a capital loan guarantee with the City (Evergreen Brickworks) has requested that the terms of the guarantee be amended so as to provide a longer repayment plan.  A staff report that addresses this request is scheduled for later this summer.

Financial Impact

As at December 31, 2013, there were:

 

- 3 outstanding operating line of credit guarantees with a maximum exposure of $4.0 million,

- 8 outstanding capital loan guarantees in the amount of $61.7 million, and

- 8 direct city loans with an outstanding balance of $72.0 million.

 

A loan guarantee is considered to be a financial commitment of the City, and impacts the City's borrowing capacity and potentially its credit rating. However, there is no direct cost to the City for providing the guarantee unless the borrower defaults on its obligation and the City cannot recover any funds paid out under the guarantee.

 

As of December 31, 2013, one loan (Just for Laughs) in the amount of $500,000 remains in default, while another loan in the amount of $122,000 was written off during 2013 (Squirrels Nest Child Care Centre). A third loan (BIXI) for which the City provided a guarantee was settled at the end of 2013 in avoidance of default by a payment of $3.65 million by the City funded through revenues from the Astral Street Furniture contract.

 

As part of this year's review, one organization (Toronto Symphony Orchestra) with a line of credit in the amount of $3 million continues to experience financial challenges, and is undertaking cash management and debt reduction initiatives in this regard and has been able to maintain its loan in good standing. A second organization with a capital loan with an outstanding balance of $4.8 million (Evergreen Brickworks) is working with the City to identify appropriate amendments to the loan term, which will be the subject of a report to City Council later this year. This loan is currently in good standing.

 

The total value of loans or loan guarantees for which loan payments are in default or past due is $500,000 as identified in this report, or approximately 0.4% of the portfolio value, as shown in the following Chart.

 

Total Value of Loans and Loan Guarantees

 

 

No. of Loans

Total Exposure

($000's)

No. of Loans in Default or Past Due

Total Value of Loans in Default or Past Due ($000's)

% of Value

Line of Credit Guarantees

3

$4,000

0

$0

0%

Capital Loan Guarantees

8

$61,716

0

$0

0%

Direct City Loans

8

$71,995

1

$500

1%

Total  @ Dec. 2013

19

$137,711

1

$500

0.4%

Total  @ Dec. 2012

24

$148,426

4

$4,772

3%

 

The quantum of the financial risk associated with the other loans and loan guarantees is difficult to establish for the reason that default, mitigation and recovery processes can vary from project to project and actual losses cannot be determined until such processes come to a conclusion.  With regular monitoring, it is possible to identify financial risks earlier and to take action to avoid or mitigate potential losses.

 

A Doubtful Loan Guarantee Reserve was established as part of last year's review, with initial funding of $160,000 from recovered amounts from previous bad loans.  An additional amount of $61,480 is expected to be recovered from a previous loan default through a clawback of grant allocation to the Toronto Arts Council over the next two years in the amount of the grant that would otherwise have been made to the defaulting organization.  The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer reviews annually the adequacy of funds in the Doubtful Loan Guarantee Reserve and will make any necessary adjustments where the cost or risk of loss under a loan guarantee or direct loan is determined to be likely and should be recognized.

Background Information

(April 7, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Annual Report on City's Loan and Loan Guarantee Portfolio
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68407.pdf
Confidential Attachment - Confidential Information

EX41.11 - Property Tax Increase Deferral/Cancellation Programs - Review of Eligibility Requirements for Ownership

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 3, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Recommendations

The Treasurer recommends that:

 

1.                  The Executive Committee receive this report for information.

Summary

As requested by City Council, this report reviews the feasibility and implications of amending the eligibility criteria for the City's Tax Increase Cancellation and Tax Increase Deferral programs for low income seniors and low income disabled persons by revising the eligibility criteria that the property be owned solely by one or more eligible persons, to account for situations where another family member co-owns the property, but does not reside at the property or contribute financially to it.

 

This report does not recommend amending the current Council-approved eligibility criteria for property tax relief under the City's Tax Increase Cancellation and Tax Increase Deferral Programs to account for situations where another family member co-owns the property but does not reside or contribute financially to it as such criteria would be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to verify and monitor.  Expanding the current eligibility criteria to allow property owners to qualify for tax relief where one or more of the property owners does not meet the age, income, residency or disability criteria, (e.g. another family member), could potentially challenge the integrity and fairness of the rebate programs.

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications arising from the recommendations in this report.

 

Should Council approve amendments to the current tax cancellation/deferral programs to change the eligibility criteria to allow applications where one or more of the registered owners of the property do not meet the age, income, residency or disability criteria (e.g., another family member), the financial impacts associated with the expanded eligibility criteria are identified in the body of this report, under the section headed: Financial Implications of Expanding Eligibility Criteria.

 

The 2014 Approved Operating Budget currently includes, as part of the non-program Tax Deficiency budget, an amount of approximately $0.9 million for these programs, representing the City's share of rebates paid under the tax cancellation program.  The cost of the education portion of the cancellation rebate (approximately $0.5 million) is recoverable from the Province.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(April 3, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Treasurer on Property Tax Increase Deferral/Cancellation Programs - Review of Eligibility Requirements for Ownership
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68251.pdf

EX41.12 - 2013 Year-End Capital Adjustments, Carry-Forward Funding Adjustments to the 2014 Approved Capital Budget and Project Closures

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Recommendations

The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:

 

1.         City Council approve additional carry forward funding of $479.659 million from unspent capital expenditure as detailed in Appendix 1 of the report (March 12, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in order to continue work on previously approved capital projects, and that the 2014 Approved Capital Budget be adjusted accordingly with no incremental impact on debt.

2.         City Council approve budget adjustments to the 2013 Approved Capital Budget for various City Programs and Agencies without impact on debt as detailed in Appendix 2 of the report (March 12, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

3.         City Council receive for information Appendix 3 of the report (March 12, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, which lists 155 capital projects/sub-projects that have been completed and are to be closed with a total combined project budget saving of $145.749 million.

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek Council's approval for 2013 in-year capital budget adjustments and carry-forward funding adjustments to the 2014 Approved Capital Budget of $479.659 million. The recommended carry forward funding adjustments are in compliance with the City's Carryforward Policy and have no impact on the City's debt levels.

 

This report also provides a list of 155 completed capital projects to be closed including the total number and value of projects under and over expenditures. $1.315 billion in projects are ready to be closed and have been completed under budget, with saving of $145.749 million. These savings will be returned to their original funding sources, including a savings of $70.130 million in debt funding.

Financial Impact

Approval of the additional carry forward funding of $479.659 million recommended in this report increase the total 2014 carry forward funding from $971.281 million to $1.451 billion with no debt impact. Recommended incremental carry forward funding will increase the 2014 Approved Capital Budget from $3.784 billion to $4.264 billion. The total additional carry forward funding of $1.451 billion represent 35% of the 2013 Approved Capital Budget. Recommended carry forward funding adjustments total $444.050 million for 2013 approved capital projects and $35.609 million for 2012 and prior year capital projects. 2012 and prior years recommended carry forward adjustments funded by debt were offset by 2014 approved cash flow deferrals that have an equivalent debt value in order to not impact approved debt funding levels.

 

Approval of the recommended 2013 budget adjustments does not have financial impact on the total 2013 Approved Capital Budget. The recommended budget adjustments have been offset by under spending in other projects/subprojects, as well as accelerations and deferrals.

 

Toronto Water requested 2013 budget adjustments detailed in a stand-alone accompanying report entitled "Toronto Water 2013 Year-End Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals". Toronto Water has reduced the contingency amounts for multi-year sub-projects that have reached substantial completion in 2013. As a result, funding contributions required from Toronto Water Capital Reserve Funds have been reduced by an equivalent amount of $27.972 million

 

Fully completed capital projects to be closed at year-end have a total under spending of $145.749 million. Closure of these projects will avoid debt borrowing in the amount of $70.130 million, return $20.468 million to reserve and reserve funds funding and $55.150 million to other funding sources such as third party funding, federal subsidies, provincial grants and donations.

Background Information

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on 2013 Year-End Capital Adjustments, Carry-Forward Funding Adjustments to the 2014 Approved Capital Budget and Project Closures
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68111.htm
(March 12, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer on 2013 Year-End Capital Adjustments, Carry-Forward Funding Adjustments to the 2014 Approved Capital Budget and Project Closures
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68084.pdf
(March 12, 2014) Appendix 1 - 2013 Carry Forward Funding Adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68081.pdf
(March 12, 2014) Appendix 2 - 2013 In-Year capital Budget Adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68082.pdf
(March 12, 2014) Appendix 3 - Capital Projects to be closed
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68083.pdf

EX41.13 - Arena Boards of Management 2012 Operating Surpluses / Deficits Settlement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
11 - York South-Weston, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 18 - Davenport, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 26 - Don Valley West, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 32 - Beaches-East York

Origin

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Recommendations

The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the 2012 operating surpluses totalling $10,245 from four Arenas (George Bell; Larry Grossman Forest Hill Memorial; North Toronto; Ted Reeve) be paid to the City of Toronto and be used to partially fund payment of the cumulative operating deficit of $136,059 for four Arenas (William H. Bolton, Leaside Memorial Community Gardens, McCormick, Moss Park), resulting in an operating net deficit of $125,814 to be funded by the City, as detailed in Appendix A, column (d), of the report (March 10, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer; and

 

2.         City Council direct that a funding provision for the 2012 net deficit of $11,314 be made through the 2013 Final Year-End Operating Variance Report, as calculated in Appendix A of the report (March 10, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

Summary

This report recommends settlements with the eight Arena Boards of Management (Arenas) of their 2012 operating surpluses and deficits based on audited financial results for the years ended December 31, 2012, with operating surpluses payable to the City and operating deficits funded by the City upon Council’s approval.

Financial Impact

The Arena Boards of Management final net settlement for the year 2012 requires that surplus funds of $10,245 be paid to the City from four arenas and be used to partially fund the payments of the operating deficit of $136,059 to the remaining four arenas, resulting in a net funding requirement from the City of $125,814.  A summary of net funding to the Arena Boards or surpluses payable to the City are detailed in Appendix A.

 

In addition, $119 of the 2011 settlement was funded from the 2012 Operating Budget, resulting in a total 2012 settlement funding requirement of $125,933.

 

Of this total funding requirement of $125,933, $114,619 was provided through the 2012 Final Year-End Operating Variance Report, leaving a balance of $11,314 to be funded through the 2013 Final Year-End Operating Variance Report.

Background Information

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Arena Boards of Management 2012 Operating Surpluses/Deficits Settlement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68112.htm
(March 10, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Arena Boards of Management 2012 Operating Surpluses/Deficits Settlement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68085.pdf

EX41.14 - Association of Community Centres Settlement of Operating Results for Year 2012

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Recommendations

The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the accumulated surpluses of $526 from two Association of Community Centres (AOCCs) centres be paid to the City of Toronto and be used to partially fund the payment of operating deficits of $117,998 for the core administration operations of the other eight centres, resulting in a net payment of $117,472 for operating over-expenditures as detailed in Appendix 1 of the report (March 12, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

Summary

This report recommends settlement with the 10 Community Centres (Association of Community Centres or AOCCs) on their Core Administration Operations for 2012 based on audited financial results.

Financial Impact

The total surpluses of $526 from two Community Centres will partially offset the funding of deficits totalling $117,998, resulting in a net payment of $117,472 from the City to the AOCCs in 2014 arising primarily from the Core Administration Operations’ year end results for 2012. The deficit payment will be funded from City under-expenditures reported through the final 2013 year-end operating variance results.

Background Information

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Association of Community Centres Settlement of Operating Results for Year 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68113.htm
(March 12, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the Deputy City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer on Association of Community Centres Settlement of Operating Results for Year 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68106.pdf

EX41.15 - Toronto Housing Allowance 2014 Budget Adjustment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Recommendations

The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:

 

1.         City Council authorize an increase of $0.870 million gross and $0 net to the 2014 Approved Operating Budget of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to include the  2014 funding requirements for the Toronto Housing Allowance program.

 

2.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to negotiate and enter into the necessary agreements with the Province, Ministry of Finance in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor to administer the 2014 housing allowance funding  requirements under the terms of the new Housing Allowance Program.

Summary

In October 2013, Council approved a one-time transfer of $3.700 million to the new Housing Allowance Reserve, XQ1112 established to facilitate the delivery of a new time-limited housing allowance program to assist up to 260 homeless and at-risk seniors' households in Toronto.

 

Drawing on the proven program delivery model in place for the Toronto Transitional Housing Allowance Program (TTHAP), staff will enter into an agreement to administer a new time-limited housing allowance program through a partnership with the Ministry of Finance.

 

This report seeks Council approval to increase the 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) by $0.870 million gross and zero net, funded from the Housing Allowance Reserve. The reserve was established to hold housing allowance funding for individuals at risk of homelessness. This adjustment is required to fund the time-limited housing allowance program to support homeless and at-risk seniors' households.

 

The report also requests authority to negotiate and enter into the necessary agreements with the Province, Ministry of Finance, to administer the housing allowances as described in the Issues Section under Program Administration.

Financial Impact

There will be no net impact to the City.

 

In October 2013, Council approved one-time transfer of $3.700 million to the new Housing Allowance Reserve, XQ1112. The reserve was established to facilitate the delivery of a new time-limited housing allowance program and assist up to 260 homeless and at-risk seniors' households in Toronto. Funding for this time-limited program is available from the 2013 allocation of the under-spending from the Housing Stabilization Fund, which commenced in 2013. 

 

The 2014 gross budget adjustment of $0.870 million will be funded by a draw from the Housing Allowance Reserve, XQ1112, which currently has a balance of $3.700 million. Funding will be transferred from SSHA to the Province for administration by the Ministry of Finance.

 

Housing Allowance program impacts for 2015 and beyond will be reported through the City's annual operating budget process, with funding projections based on anticipated client needs.

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Toronto Housing Allowance 2014 Budget Adjustment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68114.htm
(March 12, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Toronto Housing Allowance 2014 Budget Adjustment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68107.pdf

EX41.16 - Toronto Water 2013 Year End Capital Budget Adjustment and Accelerations / Deferrals

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Recommendations

The Budget Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in Toronto Water’s approved 2013 Water Capital Budget in the amount of $27.972 million, as presented in Schedule A (Part A and Part B) of the report (March 12, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero net Budget impact.

Summary

This report requests City Council’s authority to amend Toronto Water’s Approved 2013 Capital Budget by adjusting project cash flows contained within the Budget and Plan, respectively, to reflect the actual year expenditures and progress completion. The adjustment of project cash flows will have a zero gross overall Capital Budget impact and will align 2013 expenditures and future cash flows with Toronto Water’s capital project delivery schedule and program requirements. 

Financial Impact

This effect of the recommendation in this report will be an amendment to the amounts budgeted in 2013 for certain capital projects. The total amount of budget increases will be offset by a corresponding amount of budget decreases. The adjustment of project cash flows will have a zero gross overall Capital Budget impact and will align 2013 expenditures and future cash flows with Toronto Water’s capital project delivery schedule and program requirements.

 

There are no additional costs to the City as a result of approval of this report.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information. 

Background Information

(March 26, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Toronto Water 2013 Year End Capital Budget Adjustment and Accelerations/Deferrals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68115.htm
(March 12, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Toronto Water 2013 Year End Capital Budget Adjustment and Accelerations/Deferrals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68108.pdf
(March 12, 2014) Schedule A - Toronto Water 2013 Capital Budget Year End Budget Adjustments, Part A - Project Accelerations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68109.pdf
(March 12, 2014) Schedule A - Toronto Water 2013 Capital Budget Year End Budget Adjustments, Part B - Project Deferrals/Savings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68110.pdf

EX41.17 - Occupational Health and Safety Report - 3rd Quarter and Year-to-Date 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee

Recommendations

The Employee and Labour Relations Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:

 

1.         City Council receive the 3rd Quarter and Year-to-Date 2013 Occupational Health and Safety Report.

Summary

This report provides information on the status of the City’s health and safety system, specifically on activities, priorities and performance during and up to the end of the third quarter of 2013.

 

There was a 16.2% decrease in the number of lost time injuries (LTIs), a 38.9% decrease in the number of recurrences and a 0.7% increase in the number of medical aid only injuries during the first three quarters of 2013 relative to 2012. 

 

WSIB invoiced costs for the first three quarters of 2013 were $18.1 million. This was $1.5 million lower than for the same time period in 2012. This decrease was achieved in part as a result of a reduction in firefighter cancer costs. The overall WSIB costs include a significantly higher Administration rate for 2013 (35.8% from 27.6%) as well as an adjustment to the 2012 administration rate invoiced to the City in July 2013 in the amount of $792,000.

Financial Impact

There are no financial impacts to this report.

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Occupational Health and Safety Report - 3rd Quarter and Year-to-Date 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68302.htm
(January 22, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources on Occupational Health and Safety Report - 3rd Quarter and Year-to-Date 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68271.pdf
Appendix A - WSIB Claims Data, by Division (January - September)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68272.pdf
Appendix B - LTI Frequency (1st Three Quarters 2013 relative to previous years)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68273.pdf
Appendix B(i) - Agencies Comparators for WSIB Claims 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68274.pdf
Appendix C - WSIB Costs for all Firm Numbers (2009-203)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68275.pdf
Appendix D (i) - WSIB Invoiced Costs to End of 3rd Quarter (<$50,000)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68277.pdf
Appendix D (ii) WSIB Invoiced Costs to End of 3rd Quarter (>$50,000)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68276.pdf

EX41.18 - Occupational Health and Safety Report - 4th Quarter and End of Year 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee

Recommendations

The Employee and Labour Relations Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:

 

1.         City Council receive the 4th Quarter and End of Year 2013 Occupational Health and Safety Report for information.

Summary

This report provides information on the status of the City’s health and safety system, specifically on activities, priorities and performance during the fourth quarter of 2013 and health and safety performance throughout the year.

 

There was a 10.8% decrease in the total number of lost time injuries and a 34.1% decrease in the number of recurrences in 2013 relative to 2012.  There was an increase of 0.9% in medical aid injuries. WSIB invoiced costs for 2013 were approximately $577,000 lower than in 2012. The City's continuous improvement efforts have resulted in its annual costs for WSIB to be $6.6 million lower in 2013 than 2009.  This improvement reflects reduced injury severity and the effectiveness of return-to-work efforts.  In 2013, the WSIB cost decrease was achieved despite a countervailing increase in the WSIB's administration rate from 27.6 % in 2012 to 35.8% in 2013.

Financial Impact

There are no financial impacts to this report.

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Occupational Health and Safety Report - 4th Quarter and End of Year 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68326.htm
(March 18, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources on Occupational Health and Safety Report - 4th Quarter and End of Year 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68278.pdf
Appendix A - WSIB Claims Data, by Division (January - December)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68279.pdf
Appendix B - LTI Frequency
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68280.pdf
Appendix C - WSIB Costs for all Firm Numbers (2009-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68281.pdf
Appendix D(i) - WSIB Invoiced Costs <$50,000 (2009-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68282.pdf
Appendix D(ii) - WSIB Invoiced Costs >$50,000 (2009-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68283.pdf

EX41.19 - Talent Blueprint 2014-2018 - (Toronto Public Service Workforce Plan)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee

Recommendations

The Employee and Labour Relations Committee recommends to the Executive Committee that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Manager to maintain Occupational Health and Safety as a priority within Toronto Public Service Workforce Plan (Talent Blueprint 2014-2018).

 

 2.        City Council affirm the new workforce plan, the Talent Blueprint 2014-2018 Building a great Toronto Public Service, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

Summary

This report provides the new workforce plan for the City of Toronto, the "Talent Blueprint 2014-2018 Building a great Toronto Public Service".  Strategic Action #18 – Develop and Implement a Workforce Plan was one of the City Manager's 26 Strategic Actions 2013-2018 that were affirmed by City Council at its October 2013 meeting.   Strategic Action #18 provided the framework for the new Talent Blueprint; this report provides further information including the attachment that presents the new workforce plan.  The Talent Blueprint also supports Strategic Action #17 - Enhance the City's Capacity to Serve Toronto's Diversity.

 

The Talent Blueprint's goal for the City of Toronto (Toronto Public Service) is to have engaged, diverse, high-performing, adaptive and productive employees that meet our current and future needs. The Talent Blueprint's four key focus areas are:

 

 employee engagement                         diversity

 workforce capacity                             effective leaders

 

This new workforce plan provides for one clear goal and four key focus areas that the City will be targeting to build and improve the Toronto Public Service.  It focuses on key human resources strategies, objectives and actions to create a highly skilled, high-performing and diverse workforce that reflects the population that it serves with world-class customer centric programs and services.  The employees of the Toronto Public Service are a unique asset and building a highly effective organization that provides quality customer services requires strategic human resources direction and activities.

Financial Impact

The Talent Blueprint actions and its activities will utilize current funding resources, wherever possible, and any additional financial impacts needed beyond current resources will be submitted through the annual budget approval process. The Talent Blueprint's actions include conducting an independent third party survey to measure and validate the level of employee engagement to assist in continuous improvement efforts regarding program and service delivery, customer service and productivity. The baseline survey benchmark would be conducted in 2014 at a cost of $195,000 that can be funded from the Innovation Reserve Fund. Funds are available in Account No.XR1713.

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Talent Blueprint 2014-2018 - (Toronto Public Service Workforce Plan)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68328.htm
(March 25, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources on Talent Blueprint 2014-2018 - (Toronto Public Service Workforce Plan)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68293.pdf
Appendix A - Talent Blueprint 2014-2018 Building a great Toronto Public Service
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68294.pdf
(April 4, 2014) Presentation from the City Manager and the Director, Human Resources on Talent Blueprint 2014-2018 - (Toronto Public Service Workforce Plan)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68295.pdf

EX41.20 - Review of the Management/Non-union Employees, Accountability Officers and Elected Officials Benefits Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee

Recommendations

The Employee and Labour Relations Committee recommends that:

 

1.         The Executive Committee receive the item for information.

Summary

This report presents the results of discussions undertaken with the City’s benefits carrier, Manulife Financial, to explore initiatives to further manage drug costs within the context of the City’s traditional benefit plans.  Additionally, this report summarizes the success of the City’s benefits cost containment initiatives implemented over the past five (5) years. 

 

Since 2009, the City has taken many positive steps to identify and implement initiatives that have enabled the City to significantly reduce its actual benefit plan costs year-over-year and achieve much better results than currently being achieved in the industry on average.  While the Canadian Industry Average continues to reflect increases in 2013 for both health (12% increase) and dental (8% increase), the City experienced decreases in 2013 for active employees and retirees of -6.5% for health and -4.0% for dental.

 

In addition, the concerted effort over the last five (5) years to reduce benefit costs is also having a positive impact on the post-retirement portion of the City's long term employee benefit liabilities.  Post-retirement benefit liabilities have decreased by $169.0 million, or 19.7% since 2011. 

 

Continuing to build on these successes, the City will be implementing in the latter part of 2014 a Preferred Provider Network (PPN) of pharmacies that employees and retirees can voluntarily access for prescription drugs.  Additionally, City staff will continue to partner with industry experts and Manulife Financial (the City's benefits carrier) in monitoring benefit trends and costs in 2014 and 2015 (both within the City and across the industry) to help identify further areas for improvement and emerging best practices.  Staff will report back to the Employee and Labour Relations Committee by Q3 2015.

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications associated with this report.

 

Table 1, below, compares the City’s benefit costs from 2011 to 2013. In 2013, the City spent approximately $202.5 million, as compared to $206.5 million in 2011, or a decrease of $4.0 million. These benefit costs include Health, Dental, Group Life Insurance and Long Term Disability (including administrative fees and taxes) for all Active employees and Retirees (approximately 25,156 active employees and 9,637 retirees).

 

Active Employees: Based on a number of cost containment initiatives (including both administrative as well as plan design changes) implemented for active employees, the City achieved an overall decrease of $7.3 million (or -4.0%) since 2011.

 

Retirees: The cost of retiree benefits has increased by $3.3 million (13.5%). 

 

Overall: The City has achieved a decrease in its total benefit costs of $4.0 million (or

-1.9%) since 2011.

 

Table 1

Benefits Costs for Active Employees and Retirees (after administration fees & taxes)

 By Benefit Type:   2011 to 2013

 

 

2011

 

2013

Change

2011-2013

Percentage Change

 

($ millions)

Health

$93.3

$82.9

($10.4)

(11.2%)

Dental

$46.5

$41.5

($5.0)

(10.8%)

Sub-total (Health & Dental)

$139.8

$124.4

($15.4)

(11.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

LTD

$31.0

$39.5

$8.5

27.4%

Life Premiums Insurance*1

 

$11.4

 

$11.0

 

($0.4)

 

(3.5%)

Sub-total (LTD & Insurance)

$42.4

$50.5

$8.1

19.1%

Total:  Active Employees

$182.2

$174.9

($7.3)

(4.0%)

 

 

 

 

 

Retirees

$24.3

$27.6

$3.3

13.5%

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Total

$206.5

$202.5

($4.0)

(1.9%)

*1:  Includes Group Life Insurance (GLI), Accidental Death & Dismemberment (AD&D), Line of Duty of Death (LODD)

 

In addition to the cost containment initiatives implemented in the benefit plan design, the City has also taken steps to reduce the administrative fees with the benefits carrier and to reduce the long term liabilities associated with the sick leave benefits and post retirement benefits.  Table 2, below, provides a summary of the overall cost savings and liability reductions achieved over the last few years.

 

Table 2

Summary of Overall Cost Savings and Liability Reduction

 

 

Cost Savings

Liability Reduction

Benefit Plan – Cost Containment Initiatives (since 2011)

($4.0)

 

Benefit Carrier – Administration Fees *1 (City, TTC and Toronto Police Services)

($54.1)*1

 

Illness or Injury Plan (IIP)*2 Implementation

 

($174.1)

Post-Retirement Benefits

 

($169.0)

 

 

 

Sub-Total

($58.1)

($343.1)

 

 

 

Total Savings & Liability Reduction

($401.2)

*1:  Savings of $21.6 million for 2012 to 2013, plus additional savings of $32.5 million for 2014 to 2016 (inclusive).  See Council report GM3.8, May 17, 18, 19 2011 Council Meeting; http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2011.GM3.8

*2:  See E&LR Report, EL20.5. Employee & Labour Relations Committee meeting May 19, 2010:  http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2010.EL20.5

 

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has reviewed this report and agrees with the financial impact information.

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Review of the Management/Non-union Employees, Accountability Officers and Elected Officials Benefits Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68327.htm
(March 25, 2014) Report with Appendices I and II, from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Review of the Management/Non-union Employees, Accountability Officers and Elected Officials Benefits Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68322.pdf
(April 4, 2014) Revised letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Review of the Management/Non-union Employees, Accountability Officers and Elected Officials Benefits Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68487.htm

EX41.21 - Premature Death Among Members of Toronto's Aboriginal Community: Walking in their Shoes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 2, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Co-Chair, Aboriginal Affairs Committee

Recommendations

1.         The Aboriginal Affairs Committee forwards the report and presentation from Dr. Shah to the Executive Committee for information.

Summary

On March 26, 2014 the Aboriginal Affairs Committee met and discussed item AA16.3 – Premature Death Among Members of Toronto's Aboriginal Community: Walking in their Shoes.  Dr. Shah of Anishnawbe Health Toronto submitted his report and gave a presentation to the Aboriginal Affairs Committee.

 

Dr. Shah's report traced the average age of death and causes of death amongst aboriginal people living in Toronto over the past several years.  His findings were disturbing.  The average age of death for the aboriginal community was 37, compared to 75 years of age for Torontonians overall.

 

The report delved deeper into the causes of death and points to the root cause of this shocking finding to deeper impacts of colonial and postcolonial policies on social determinants of health: Assimilation Policy, Systemic Discrimination, and Cultural Disruption.

 

In the view of the Aboriginal Affairs Committee, the findings of this report should be presented to the Executive Committee for their consideration.

Background Information

(April 2, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton on Premature Death Among Members of Toronto's Aboriginal Community - Walking in their Shoes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68372.pdf
(April 2, 2014) Attachment 1 - Early Death Among Members of Toronto's Aboriginal Community: Walking in their Shoes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68390.pdf
(April 2, 2014) Attachment 2 - Presentation by Dr. Shah, Dr. Klair, and Dr. Reeves
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68391.pdf

EX41.22 - Toronto Police Service - 2013 Annual Hate/Bias Crime Statistical Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

Recommendations

The Chair, Toronto Police Services Board recommends that:

 

1.         The Executive Committee receive this report for information.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Executive Committee with the Toronto Police Service’s (Service) 2013 Annual Hate/Bias Crime Statistical Report.

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications with regard to the receipt of this report.

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Report and Appendix A, from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Toronto Police Service - 2013 Annual Hate/Bias Crime Statistical Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68360.pdf

Communications

(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Cenk Sayin (EX.New.EX41.22.1)

EX41.23 - Toronto City Council Supports Recall Legislation for Elected Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Letter from City Council

Recommendations

Councillor Chin Lee, seconded by Councillor Mike Del Grande, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council support Bill 124 and request:

 

a.          the Province of Ontario to include municipalities in voter recall legislation;

 

b.          that a recall petition must be signed by the lesser of 25 percent of eligible voters in an electoral district or 50 percent of the number of voters who voted in the last election in that electoral district, and that the signatures must be verified by the Chief Electoral Officer;

 

c.          the period of the recall drive be 99 days;

 

d.          that three-quarters (75 percent) of the estimated cost of the by-election as a result of a successful recall drive be borne by the proponent of the recall drive; and

 

e.         that a mechanism be implemented whereby proponents of a recall drive can raise money to fund at minimum three quarters of the estimated cost of the resulting by-election.

Summary

City Council on April 1, 2 and 3, 2014, referred Motion MM50.2 to the Executive Committee.

 

On October 30, 2013, MPP Randy Hillier introduced a Private Member's Bill in the Ontario Legislature. Bill 124, the Election Amendment Act (MPP's Recall), introduces a process whereby citizens can recall elected members of the Legislative Assembly of Ontario and a by-election held to fill the vacant seat.

 

Proponents would need to acquire the signatures of at least 25 percent of total eligible voters on a recall petition and those voters must live in the electoral district where the recall drive is held. Applications for the issuance of a recall petition cannot occur within the first year of a Member's election and a year before the next general provincial election.

 

When a recall petition is issued, the proponent has 60 days to have at least 25 percent of the electorate in the electoral district sign the recall petition. The recall petition must be submitted to the Chief Electoral Officer within that 60 day period. Failure to meet the aforementioned two conditions allows the Member to hold on to his or her seat.

 

In the case where the recall organizer acquires the signatures of at least 25 percent of the electorate in the electoral district on a recall petition and submits the recall petition to the Chief Electoral Officer within 60 days of the recall petition being issued, the seat of the Member in the Ontario Legislature becomes vacant. A by-election must be held to fill the vacant seat. The recalled member can be a candidate in the by-election.

 

As the percentage of votes cast in municipal elections could be lower than 50 percent, it is suggested that 50 percent of the number of votes cast in the last election could also be used as the minimum threshold for signatures on the recall petition.

 

Whereas the Private Member's Bill does not address the added cost of holding by-elections, the legislation includes the added responsibility for the proponent to raise 75 percent of the estimated cost of holding the by-election and the petition period be increased to 99 days to allow for this additional responsibility.

 

(Submitted to City Council on April 1 and 2, 2014 as MM50.2)

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Letter from City Council on Toronto City Council Supports Recall Legislation for Elected Officials
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68303.pdf

EX41.24 - Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(April 4, 2014) Letter from City Council

Recommendations

Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships and the Toronto Public Art Commission to work with representatives from the Armenian National Committee of Toronto to determine the resources needed and best location for a monument commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide.

Summary

City Council on April 1, 2 and 3, 2014, referred Motion MM50.5 to the Executive Committee.

 

The Armenian Genocide was the systematic extermination by the Ottoman Empire of its minority Armenian subjects. This atrocity took place during and after World War I and the number of people killed has been estimated at between 1 and 1.5 million.

 

The Armenian Genocide is commemorated on April 24th each year, the date in 1915 the Ottoman Government arrested over 200 Armenian community leaders in Constantinople. They were sent to prison in Anatolia, where most were summarily executed. Thereafter, thousands upon thousands were subjected to forced labour, massacred or deported.

  

Toronto's Armenian Community via the Armenian National Committee of Toronto would like to erect a monument to commemorate this significant anniversary and its Canadian significance. Some potential locations have been identified by the community and they are prepared to either donate an existing monument or go through the process of having one commissioned.

 

(Submitted to City Council on April 1 and 2, 2014 as MM50.5)

Background Information

(April 4, 2014) Letter from City Council on Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of the Armenian Genocide
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68304.pdf

Communications

(April 14, 2014) E-mail from Deniz Berrak Coskun, Avim, Center for Eurasian Studies (EX.New.EX41.24.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-46861.pdf
(April 21, 2014) E-mail from Filiz Tumer (EX.New.EX41.24.2)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Yesim Yoruk (EX.New.EX41.24.3)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Huseyin Nurgel (EX.New.EX41.24.4)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Cuneyt Birol (EX.New.EX41.24.5)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Hakan Alpay (EX.New.EX41.24.6)
(April 22, 2014) Submission from Yasemin Sayin (EX.New.EX41.24.7)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Burcu Arigsoy (EX.New.EX41.24.8)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Cenk Baskaraca (EX.New.EX41.24.9)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Mustafa Eric (EX.New.EX41.24.10)
(April 23, 2014) E-mail from Elvan Ellie Amasya (EX.New.EX41.24.11)
(April 23, 2014) E-mail from Uluç Özgüven (EX.New.EX41.24.12)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Cenk Sayin (EX.New.EX41.24.13)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Yesim Yoruk (EX.New.EX41.24.14)
(April 22, 2014) Fax from Saadettin Ozcan (EX.New.EX41.24.15)
(April 23, 2014) Letter from Dragi Stojkovski (EX.New.EX41.24.16)
(April 23, 2014) Letter from The Federation of Canadian Turkish Associations (EX.New.EX41.24.17)
(April 23, 2014) Submission from David Warner (EX.New.EX41.24.18)
(April 23, 2014) E-mail from Mehmet Bor, The Federation of Canadian Turkish Associations (EX.New.EX41.24.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-46927.pdf
(April 23, 2014) E-mail from Bahire Alsan (EX.New.EX41.24.20)
(April 23, 2014) E-mail from Yesim Yourk (EX.New.EX41.24.21)
(April 23, 2014) E-mail from Sam Manougian, Armenian National Committee of Toronto (EX.New.EX41.24.22)
(April 22, 2014) E-mail from Hande Bilhan (EX.New.EX41.24.23)
(April 23, 2014) E-mail from Niyazi Mustafa (EX.New.EX.41.24.24)
(April 23, 2014) Submission from Yasemin Sayin (EX.New.EX41.24.25)
(April 23, 2014) Submission from Harout Manougian (EX.New.EX41.24.26)
(April 23, 2014) Submission from Narmin Sultanova (EX.New.EX41.24.27)

EX41.25 - Joint Meeting of Community Development and Recreation Committee and Economic Development Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 19, 2014) Memo from Councillor Perruzza

Recommendations

Councillor Anthony Perruzza recommends that:

 

1.         The Community Development and Recreation Committee and the Economic Development Committee hold a joint meeting in May 2014 to consider a report(s) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A that provides an update on workforce development and social assistance reform.

Summary

The Chairs of the Economic Development and Community Development and Recreation Committees recommend that a joint meeting be held to consider a report(s) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A providing an update on workforce development and social assistance reform including such items as: the implications of the proposed Canada Jobs Grant program, the Housing Stabilization Fund, and OW claw backs/eligibility criteria related to employment earning limits for those on assistance and asset limits for those applying for assistance.

The purpose of the meeting will be to review staff reports and the repercussions of program and policy changes at both the federal and provincial level. The Committees have a shared interest and mandate in looking for ways to improve the economic opportunities for residents, resulting in improved social and health outcomes for Torontonians.

Background Information

(March 19, 2014) Memo from Councillor Anthony Perruzza on Joint Meeting of Community Development and Recreation Committee and Economic Development Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-68573.pdf
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council