City Council

Meeting No.:
19
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Thursday, June 9, 2016

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
clerk@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed. The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

 

Members of Council and Staff: Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended. The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements: If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

June 2, 2016


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

Routine Matters - Meeting 19

RM19.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All
Attention
Council will consider the Mayor's Key Matter, EX15.1 - The City of Toronto's Long-term Financial Direction, as the first item of business.

Items EX15.7 and ED12.4 will be considered together

Items EX15.13 and ED12.3 will be considered together

Council voted to consider the following items at specific times:

On Tuesday, June 7:
  • Item EX15.28 - College Promenade Business Improvement Area Streetscape Project Financing, as the second item of business following the Mayor's Key Item

  • On Wednesday, June 8:

  • Item PG12.8 - Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines - Final Report, as the first item of business on June 8


Summary

  • O Canada
  • Moment of Silence
  • Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Financial Impact

 

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Bob Acton
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94133.pdf
Condolence Motion for Aileen Benn
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94068.pdf
Condolence Motion for Sara Rosen
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94134.pdf
Condolence Motion for Charlcie Mae Stickley
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94135.pdf

RM19.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the meeting held on May 3, 4 and 5, 2016.

RM19.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Deferred Committee Items:

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE14.9

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE15.78

 

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 15 on May 24, 2016

Submitted by Mayor John Tory, Chair

 

Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 12 on May 18, 2016

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

 

Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 12 on May 17, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 12 on May 9, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Licensing and Standards Committee from Meeting 11 on May 19, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Cesar Palacio, Chair

 

Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 11 on May 12, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Michelle Holland, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 12 on May 11, 2016

Submitted by Councillor David Shiner, Chair

 

Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 13 on May 16, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Jaye Robinson, Chair

 

Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 9 on May 25, 2016

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 14 on May 10, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 14 on May 10, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 14 on May 10, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Chin Lee, Chair

 

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 16 on May 10, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Mike Layton, Chair

 

New Business and Business Previously Requested submitted by City Officials

RM19.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM19.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

RM19.6 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

June 7, 2016 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94067.pdf
June 8, 2016 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94109.pdf
June 9, 2016 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94110.pdf

Deferred Items - Meeting 19

TE14.9 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street

(Deferred by City Council from March 10, 2016 - 2016.TE14.9)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE14.9b with recommendations).

Communication TE14.9.2 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council include the property at 158 Pearl Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Inclusion): 158 Pearl Street attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (January 19, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Origin

(January 19, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the property at 158 Pearl Street (including the entrance address at 154 Pearl Street) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.  Located on north side of Pearl Street, east of Duncan Street, the property contains the White Swan Mills Building (1903), which is an important surviving heritage industrial building that contributes to the character of the King-Spadina neighbourhood.

 

There is a pending development application for the property at 158 Pearl Street, and its inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register would enable heritage staff to monitor the site and encourage the retention of its heritage values and attributes.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 19, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88719.pdf
Attachment 1 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88720.pdf
Attachment 2 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88721.pdf
Attachment 3 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88722.pdf
Attachment 4 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88723.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(May 27, 2016) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street (TE14.9b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93968.pdf
Attachment No. 1 - Revised Statement of Significance (May 27, 2016) (Reasons for Inclusion)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93969.pdf

Speakers

Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP
Nancy Campbell, Registered Nurses Association of Ontario

Communications (Community Council)

(February 19, 2016) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, acting on behalf of the Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (TE.Supp.TE14.9.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58990.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(March 9, 2016) Letter from Doris Grinspun, Chief Executive Officer, Registered Nurses' Association of Ontario (CC.Main.TE4.9.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-60711.pdf

9a - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street

Origin
(February 11, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on February 10, 2016, considered a report (January 19, 2016) from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, regarding Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Register - 158 Pearl Street.

Background Information (Community Council)
(February 11, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register - 158 Pearl Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-90587.pdf

TE15.78 - 48 Abell Street - Request to Report to City Council Regarding Workshop Space

(Deferred by City Council from May 3, 2016 - 2016.TE15.78)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
Without Recommendation

Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE15.78a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to report directly to the May 3 and 4, 2016 meeting of City Council with respect to whether the workshop spaces at 48 Abell Street should be acquired.

Origin

(April 5, 2016) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão, Ward 18, Davenport

Summary

Abell Investments Limited ("Abell") and the City of Toronto (the "City") entered into a section 37 agreement (the "agreement") on July 12, 2012, which was registered on April 13, 2015, as Instrument No. AT3855798, in respect of lands municipally known as 48 Abell Street, Toronto.

 

The section 37 agreement provides as follows:

 

3.1.1 The Owner shall enter into an agreement to sell approximately six (6) at-grade workshops fronting on the mews (approximately 430 square metres) to the City, or an art-space management organization acceptable to the City, at $250.00 per square foot, indexed to the construction price index from July 17, 2007; and

 

3.1.2 The agreement referred to in subsection 3.1.1 above shall include an option for the City to purchase additional at-grade workshops in the mixed use building fronting on the mews for affordable arts-related space at market rates of $350.00 per square foot, indexed to the construction price index from July 17, 2007.

 

It is necessary that City Planning report to City Council for instruction on whether the workshop space should be acquired by the City.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 5, 2016) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão - 48 Abell Street - Request to Report to City Council Regarding Workshop Space
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91853.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(May 2, 2016) Supplementary Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 48 Abell Street - Option to purchase workshop space (TE15.78a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93728.pdf

Executive Committee - Meeting 15

EX15.1 - The City of Toronto's Long-term Financial Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's Key Matter and first Item of business on Tuesday, June 7th.

Communications EX15.1.12 and EX15.1.13 have been submitted on this item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report in the fall of 2016 on a framework for the City's multi-year financial and budget process.

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report in the fall of 2016 on strategies and processes to strengthen the City's strategic decision-making and financial oversight that will:

 

a.  support Council in setting priorities and outcomes in order to deliver its strategic agenda;

 

b.  have a multi-year focus;

 

c.  integrate program planning for City services and the infrastructure delivered by City programs, through divisions and agencies, with the City's financial planning and budgeting to achieve the strategic allocation of resources to meet intended outcomes; and

 

d.  strengthen the City's financial management and oversight of City programs and agencies.

 

3.  City Council request the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report in the fall of 2016 on the framework for a multi-year Expenditure Management Plan, which should include short-term and long-term strategies to deliver a business transformation program that:

 

a.  modernizes processes, improves productivity, embeds efficiencies to achieve excellence in service delivery and maximizes value for residents; and

 

b.  strategically manages assets to maximize their use in supporting service delivery.

 

4.  City Council request the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report in the fall of 2016 on multi-year revenue strategy that:

 

a.  examines ways the City can optimize revenue generation from existing and new sources;

 

b.  identifies implementation costs, timing, and the sustainability of revenue options;

 

c.  establishes principles to guide the selection of potential revenues; and

 

d.  establishes a framework for the further application of both existing and new revenues.

 

5.  City Council request the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to undertake an asset optimization study, including consideration of how possible proceeds could be used to address the City's capital deficit through the City Building Fund and report in the fall of 2016.

 

6. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to prepare a fiscal impact summary for each Council meeting which summarizes the financial and staffing implications of Standing Committee reports on that agenda.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer gave a presentation on the City of Toronto's Long-term Financial Direction.

Origin

(May 16, 2016) Report from the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Summary

This is a report on the long-term financial outlook for the City of Toronto.

 

The City of Toronto is the sixth largest government in Canada, with a total 2016 operating and capital budget of nearly $15 billion. This represents an investment of over $5,200 per resident, supporting services vital to our community and economy.

 

The budget is decided by City Council on an annual basis. This is a highly transparent process, providing detailed financial data and encouraging public participation.

 

This report explores the underlying conditions of City finances by reviewing the expense and revenue patterns of recent budgets. The past six years demonstrate a consistent pattern and are the focus of this analysis.

 

In order to provide the clearest understanding of the total cost and levels of municipal services, the analysis is primarily focused on overall (gross) expenses and revenues. Where appropriate, data are adjusted to ensure comparability over time. The general approach is to broaden discussion from the short-term narratives that typically dominate a single budget cycle.

 

The basic patterns of the recent past are straightforward. Overall City expenses have been constrained over the past six years, rising much more slowly than earlier periods. Costs have declined slightly when adjusted for the combined effects of inflation and population growth.

 

This expense constraint has been supported by savings from cost-shared social programs and deferrals of operating and, particularly, capital expense. The practice of deferring necessary expense is most evident in the increased number of unfunded capital projects and priorities, now estimated at up to $29 billion over 15 years.

 

On the revenue side, reliance on property tax has decreased over the past six years. When adjusted for price inflation, property tax revenues have also actually decreased since 2010. Overall revenue growth has been supported by increases in utility rates for water and solid waste, Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) fares and other user fees and rapid growth in Municipal Land Transfer Tax (MLTT) revenues.

 

Each of these expense and revenue conditions has been critical in supporting the balanced budgets and selective increases in services achieved over the past six years. The analysis strongly suggests that the positive circumstances of the recent past are unlikely to continue and, at the very least, cannot form the basis for responsible future fiscal planning.

 

The report also provides a basic forecast of future expense pressures and revenue performance, adopting both a longer time frame and building in key inputs from City agencies. This analysis is necessarily high-level and will be subject to revision as Council provides specific direction and additional data emerges over time.

 

Quantitative projections confirm notable expense challenges in the future, in addition to typical labour and material cost pressures.

 

Projected expense pressures include:

 

-  funding requirements for TTC and Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC)

 

-  annualized costs related to earlier capital and operating commitments

 

-  addressing prior year deferrals of employee benefit liabilities and adjustment in response to the loss of the Toronto Pooling Compensation grant.

 

At the same time, it is anticipated that revenue growth will slow in the absence of policy changes.

 

Projected overall revenues for future years will be influenced by:

 

-  continued low growth in property tax revenues

 

-  leveling off of increases related water and solid waste charges, TTC fares and other user fees

 

-  anticipated maturity of Municipal Land Transfer Tax revenues.

 

Looking towards future years, there are unlikely to be quick solutions or shortcuts to achieve balanced budgets as:

 

-  annual surpluses are falling and are, at any rate, an essential element of the already inadequate capital finance strategy

 

-  reserve funds are already at relatively low levels compared to other jurisdictions

 

-  funding from the governments of Ontario and Canada will be essential to City building, but cannot replace long-term gaps in operating funding or fully offset unmet capital needs.

 

The overall gap between expense and revenue will likely draw attention. The intention is explicitly not to set off a sense of immediate urgency, expense slashing or revenue grab.

 

It is more important to focus on shifting the underlying structure of both expense and revenue management than to search for short-term measures. In a very real way, decisions over a number of years have made both further expense tightening and revenue increases inevitable. It is no longer appropriate or feasible to defer difficult financial decisions to future years.

 

The time has come for a direct conversation concerning the City's finances.

 

Remediation cannot be accomplished in a single step or outlined in a single report. It is not possible or appropriate to jump from diagnosis to solution in the absence of a meaningful engagement with Council and Toronto's residents and businesses. The problems have developed over years, and solutions will take both time and effort.

 

The report therefore outlines a series of principles and directions to guide the development of new strategies to manage expense and expand revenue.

 

Many of the principles and potential measures to be considered will be controversial. But real change will be required to ensure the City's financial stability into the future and to support Council's policy direction to invest in and support the growth of our community.

 

The 2017 Budget cycle will overlap with the long-term considerations described in this report. The pressures expected for 2017 may pose challenges. As the City undertakes the budget process over the coming months, it will be important to ensure consistency between decisions taken in the short-term and the City's emerging long-term priorities.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 16, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on the City of Toronto's Long-Term Financial Direction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92968.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Presentation from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on the City of Toronto's Long-Term Financial Direction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93367.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

Presentation from the City Manager on the City of Toronto's Long-term Financial Direction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-94252.pdf

Speakers

Tim Maguire, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees, CUPE, Local 79
Michael Rosenberg
Adina Lebo, Chair, Canadian Association of Retired People - CARP
Sean Meagher, Executive Director, Social Planning Toronto
John Cartwright, President, Toronto and York Region Labour Council
Sheila Block, Senior Economist, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Ontario Office
John Camilleri, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local One, Toronto Hydro Workers
Helen Armstrong, Community Development and Social Action Worker, St. Stephen's Community House
Scott Travers, President, The Society of Energy Professionals
Michael Polanyi, Commitment to Community
Paul Codd
Derek Moran
Shirley Bush
Hamish Wilson
Steve Barnes, Wellesley Institute
Robert Wardlaw
Henrik Bechmann
Councillor Pam McConnell
Councillor Gord Perks
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Joe Cressey
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Mary Fragedakis
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Councillor Anthony Perruzza

Communications (Committee)

(May 19, 2016) Letter from John Kiru, Executive Director, Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas (TABIA) (EX.Supp.EX15.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-60907.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from Helen Armstrong, St. Stephen's Community House (EX.Supp.EX15.1.2)
(May 20, 2016) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (EX.Supp.EX15.1.3)
(May 20, 2016) Letter from Tim Maguire, President, CUPE Local 79 (EX.Supp.EX15.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61023.pdf
(May 20, 2016) Letter from Brooks Barnett, Manager, Government Relations and Policy, Real Property Association of Canada (REALPAC) (EX.Supp.EX15.1.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61024.pdf
(May 20, 2016) Letter from Henrik Bechmann (EX.Supp.EX15.1.6)
(May 19, 2016) Letter from Ryan Noble, Executive Director, North York Harvest Food Bank (EX.Supp.EX15.1.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61032.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from Sheila Block, Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives Ontario Office (CCPA) (EX.New.EX15.1.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61046.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from John Camilleri, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local One - Toronto Hydro Workers (EX.New.EX15.1.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61047.pdf
(May 19, 2016) Letter from Michael Polanyi on behalf of the Commitment 2 Community Coalition (EX.Supp.EX15.1.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61048.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Submission from Paul Codd (EX.New.EX15.1.11)

Communications (City Council)

(May 25, 2016) E-mail from John Alexopoulos (CC.Main.EX15.1.12)
(June 2, 2016) E-mail from John Alexopoulos (CC.Supp.EX15.1.13)

EX15.3 - Invest Toronto - Annual General Meeting and 2015 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council treat that portion of the City Council meeting at which this report is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Invest Toronto Inc. by:

 

a.  appointing PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Invest Toronto Inc. for fiscal year 2016, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Invest Toronto to fix the remuneration of the Auditor;

 

b.  receiving the "Invest Toronto 2015 Annual Report, Building a Global Toronto", and the "Invest Toronto 2015 Audited Financial Statements" contained within the 2015 Annual Report, forming Attachment 1 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

2.  City Council receive the "Invest Toronto Inc. Executive Compensation Disclosure 2015", forming Attachment 2 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

3.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Invest Toronto 2015 Audited Financial Statements" contained within the 2015 Annual Report, forming Attachment 1 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(May 9, 2016) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Invest Toronto Inc. including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements for 2015 and appointment of the Auditor for 2016.

 

This report also contains recommendations for receipt at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of information disclosing the individual compensation of executive officers employed by Invest Toronto Inc. in 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 9, 2016) Report from the City Manager and Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Invest Toronto Incorporated - Annual General Meeting and 2015 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92966.pdf
Attachment 1 - Invest Toronto 2015 Annual Report, Building a Global Toronto Including - Invest Toronto 2015 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93038.pdf
Attachment 2 - Invest Toronto - Executive Compensation Disclosure 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93039.pdf

EX15.4 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated - Annual General Meeting and 2015 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council, in its capacity as one of the Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated, and for the purposes of satisfying the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) to conduct the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated, and:

 

a.  receive the "Communication from the Chair, Board of Directors, Toronto Pan  Am Sports Centre Inc. (April 29, 2016)", forming Attachment 1 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer;

 

b.  receive the "Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. 2015 Annual Report", forming Attachment 2 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer;

 

c.  receive the "Financial Statements for Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. for year ended December 31, 2015", forming Attachment 3 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer;

 

d.  approve the Resolution of Shareholders forming Attachment 4 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer;

 

i.  to receive the "Financial Statements for Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. for year ended December 31, 2015";

 

ii.  to approve the re-appointment of Welch LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the external auditor of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. for the year ending December 31, 2016, and authorize the Board of Directors of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated to set the external auditor's remuneration; and

 

iii.  to ratify all corporate proceedings since the last annual meeting of the shareholders;

 

e.  approve the Resolution of Shareholders forming Attachment 5 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, approving the "Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Budget for 2016" which forms Schedule A to this Resolution (and is Attachment 6 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer); and

 

f.   City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the Resolutions of the Shareholder  substantially in the forms of Attachments 4 and 5 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, effective as of June 15, 2016 in order to give effect thereto.

 

2. City Council:

 

a.  amend the composition of the City's appointments to the Board of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated to remove two appointed Directors (the Director, Accounting Services in the Office of the Treasurer and the Director, Facilities Operations in Facilities Management in Parks, Forestry and Recreation), and appoint two replacement Directors (the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation or their designate and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer or their designate), effective on July 1, 2016, such that the composition of the 5 Directors appointed by the City shall be:

 

i.  two public/citizen members;

 

ii. the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, or their designate;

 

iii  the Director of Community Recreation in Parks, Forestry and Recreation;

 

iv.  the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer or their designate;

 

b.  appoint the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation or their designate Board member to serve as Chair of the Board, as per the unanimous shareholders' agreement between the two Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated;

 

c.  amend the City's Policy on Board Governance Structures to revise the Board composition as set out in Recommendations 2a and 2b; and

 

d.  appoint as Directors of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation or their designate, the Director of Community Recreation in Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer or their designate for a term of office from July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2018, and until successors are appointed.

 

3.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of the "Financial Statements for Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated for year ended December 31, 2015", forming Attachment 1 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(May 9, 2016) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present two shareholder resolutions for approval by City Council, on behalf of the City in its capacity as one of the two Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated ("TPASC Inc."), and to recommend amendment to the composition of City-appointed Board members and appoint a Chair of the Board. 

 

The first resolution addresses the matters requiring Shareholder approval under the Business Corporations Act at the Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc.  These matters include: the confirmation of the corporation's proceedings since the last annual meeting of the shareholders, the receipt of financial statements, and the appointment of the auditor. The second resolution provides the Shareholders' approval of the annual operating and capital budgets required under the unanimous shareholders' agreement between the two Shareholders of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc.

 

Amendment to the composition of City-appointed Board members, and appointment of the Board Chair, is intended to enhance alignment of Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated Board decisions with City priorities and operations, protect the City's financial position, help balance City and University administrative leadership on the Board, and protect City stakeholder interests.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 9, 2016) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated - Annual General Meeting and 2015 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92969.pdf
Attachment 1 - Communication from the Chair, Board of Directors, Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated (April 29 2016), on the 2015 Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93052.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated 2015 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93053.pdf
Attachment 3 - Financial Statements for Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated for year ended December 31, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93054.pdf
Attachment 4 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incoporated Resolutions of the Shareholder (1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93055.pdf
Attachment 5 - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Incorporated Resolutions of the Shareholder (2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93056.pdf
Attachment 6 - Schedule A - Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre combined capital and operating budget for the year 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93057.pdf

EX15.5 - Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and 2015 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council treat that portion of the Council meeting at which this report is considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Port Lands Company by:

 

     a.  appointing Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Toronto Port Lands Company for fiscal year 2016, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Toronto Port Lands Company to fix the Auditor's remuneration;

 

     b.  receiving the "Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC), Annual Report 2015: Achievements and Results since 1986 (which includes Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2015)", forming Attachment 1 to the report (May 6, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer; and

 

     c.  receiving the information concerning "Toronto Port Lands Company: Executive Compensation Disclosure 2014 and 2015", forming Attachment 2 to the report (May 6, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to forward a copy of "Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC), Annual Report 2015: Achievements and Results since 1986 (which includes Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2015)", forming Attachment 1 to the report (May 6, 2016) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to the Audit Committee for information.

Origin

(May 6, 2016) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report contains recommendations for the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation (TEDCO) operating as Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC), including receipt of its Annual Report for 2015 and audited Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2015, and appointment of the Auditor for 2016.

 

This report also contains recommendations for receipt at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of information disclosing the individual compensation of executive officers employed by Toronto Port Lands Company in 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 6, 2016) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and 2015 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92930.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Port Lands Company, Annual Report 2015 - Achievements and Results since 1986 (which includes Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2015)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92984.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Port Lands Company - Executive Compensation Disclosure 2014 and 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92985.pdf

EX15.6 - Hosting the 2017 World Police and Fire Games

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  Provided firm funding commitments are received by June 10, 2016 from the Federal and Provincial Governments, as outlined in Attachment 1 of the report (May 20, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Service, City Council direct the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, to negotiate, approve and execute, on behalf of the City of Toronto, the Operating Games Agreements required by the World Police and Fire Games Federation to host the 2017 World Police and Fire Games; and

 

a.  if commitments from the Federal and Provincial Governments are received, the City of Toronto contribution of in-kind services will be made of up to a maximum of $3 million CDN to support the 2017 World Police and Fire Games. 

 

2.  City Council direct the City Manager, or his designate, to negotiate, approve and execute on behalf of the City of Toronto, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, firm financial commitments from the Federal and Provincial Governments by June 10, 2016.

Origin

(May 20, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services

Summary

The World Police and Fire Games (WPFG) is a multi-sport and recreation event for full-time and retired professional firefighters and sworn law enforcement officers (police, customs, and corrections).  The Games are an international and community celebration of individuals and organizations involved in community safety, protection and engagement.  The WPFG happens every two years and generates positive economic and social impacts on the host community.

 

In 2011, Toronto lost the City Council supported bid for the 2017 World Police and Fire Games to Montreal.  However, in April 2016, Montreal cancelled the Games, due to local political reasons.  The World Police and Fire Games Federation, which owns the event and grants host cities, approached the City of Toronto about hosting the Games in 2017. 

 

The World Police and Fire Games Federation requested a response from Toronto by mid-May 2016 about whether Toronto has the organizational, financial and venue capacity to host the Games and be operational for registration in the fall of 2016.

 

This report examines the feasibility of hosting the event. At the time of writing this report, it is unclear whether the Federal or Provincial governments plan to financially support the Games. Similarly, if City Council does wish to proceed with supporting the Games, a source of City financing needs to be secured prior to the 2017 budget cycle, which is not currently available.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 20, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services on Hosting the 2017 World Police and Fire Games
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93348.pdf
Attachment 1 - Operating Budget
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93349.pdf
Attachment 2 - Organization Chart
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93350.pdf
(May 18, 2016) Attachment 3 - Letter of Support from the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters Association (TPFFA - Local 3888)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93351.pdf
(May 18, 2016) Attachment 4 - Letter of Support from the Toronto Police Association
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93352.pdf
Attachment 5 - Potential List of World Police and Fire Games Venues
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93353.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services on Hosting the 2017 World Police and Fire Games
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92963.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(May 20, 2016) Letter from Tom Stamatakis, President, Canadian Police Association (EX.Supp.EX15.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61035.pdf

EX15.7 - Implementation of the Mayor's Advisory Panel Recommendations for Future "Mega" International Event Bidding and Hosting in the Toronto Region

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Items EX15.7 and ED12.4 to be considered together.

Communications EX15.7.27 to EX15.7.31 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the City of Toronto Standard Definitions for Special Events to include a new definition for Mega Events, included Appendix A to the report (May 13, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

 

2.  City Council endorse the Recommendations (listed below) and the Evaluation Principles of the Mayor's Advisory Panel on International Hosting Opportunities as outlined in the report (May 13, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and as further detailed in Appendix B to the report (May 13, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture:

 

a.  the City adopt hosting principles to evaluate current event hosting opportunities;

 

b.  the City adopt a long-term policy for hosting major international events;

 

c.  the City identify dedicated financial and staff resources to the planning and evaluation of international events;

 

d.  the City, Province and other municipalities and agencies establish a new hosting partnership and/or process so that the Toronto region is competitive in pursuing international events; and

 

e.  All three orders of government commit to a predictable approach to supporting international events in Southern Ontario and other major urban regions in Canada.

 

3.  City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to engage with a range of regional stakeholders to (i) gauge interest and (ii) identify potential strategies or approaches for a cross-regional partnership to pursue and develop future international event hosting opportunities.

 

4.  City Council request that the Mayor submit a letter on behalf of the City of Toronto to the Ontario Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport and the Federal Ministers of Canadian Heritage and Sport and Persons with Disabilities in support of an intergovernmental policy dialogue concerning the terms, requirements and processes necessary to ensure predictable and appropriate intergovernmental support for future major international events.

  

5.  City Council accept the offer of a privately funded feasibility report to determine the incremental cost and associated benefits with hosting Expo 2025 and request the City Manager to participate in the establishment of the Terms of Reference for the feasibility report, with the final report to be submitted to the City Manager by mid August 2016 for comment and analysis.

 

6. City Council request that the City Manager submit the feasibility report to the Executive Committee no later than its meeting of October 26, 2016. 

 

7. City Council request the Government of Ontario and the Government of Canada to:

 

a.  participate in the establishment of the Terms of Reference for the feasibility report, and;

 

b.  consider the feasibility report, and the possibility of a bid at the same time as the Executive Committee, in October, 2016.

 

8. City Council require that any City bid for Expo 2025 be contingent upon an agreement with the Federal and Provincial governments that any Expo funding by those governments be separate and in addition to any current and future funding allocations to transit, housing and other infrastructure provided to the City by those governments.

 

9.  City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture report back on potential impacts to other international hosting opportunities in future years should the City of Toronto pursue a bid for Expo 2025.

Origin

(May 13, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

In the fall of 2015, the Mayor convened a three-member citizen advisory panel to provide advice on major international hosting opportunities in Toronto. This work was undertaken to build on the legacy of the TORONTO 2015 Pan Am / Parapan Am Games and provide the City of Toronto and its partners with a foundation for consideration of future hosting opportunities.

 

The Mayor's Advisory Panel on International Hosting Opportunities identified two types of special events – "Mega Events", referring to the Olympics (Winter and Summer), World Expos, and the FIFA World Cup, and "Global Community Events", a second tier of significant, but smaller, special events that correspond with Category A and B of the City of Toronto Standard Definitions for Special Events (see Appendix A). This report responds to the Panel's recommendations related to "Mega Events". A second report proposing a strategy for bidding on and hosting Category A and B significant special events will be considered by the Economic Development Committee and Council in the same cycle as this report.

 

In light of the principles and recommendations from the Panel's report, and staff consultations with relevant stakeholders and organization officials, this report also provides findings concerning City support for the "Canada 2025" World Expo, which was previously considered by Council in 2014. The findings of this report are that (i) the Government of Canada is the lead organization in supporting and promoting an Expo bid internationally; (ii) a responsible and transparent hosting plan for Expo requires funding commitments from all orders of government before a bid is submitted; and (iii) the timeline and resources necessary to develop a Canadian bid represent major constraints at this relatively late stage in the cycle for the 2025 World Expo. Given these considerations, staff do not recommend that the City provide additional resources to support the bid until such time as funding commitments are delivered by the Provincial and/or the Federal government concerning support for Expo 2025 event-related infrastructure and operating costs.

 

This report also recommends that the City engage with regional partners in preliminary evaluation of future (and potentially more viable) international event hosting opportunities that could be pursued through strong intergovernmental cooperation and regional partnerships.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 13, 2016) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Implementation of the Mayor's Advisory Panel Recommendations for Future "Mega" International Event Bidding and Hosting in the Toronto Region
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92964.pdf
Appendix B - Report from the Mayor's Advisory Panel on International Hosting Opportunities - "Bringing the World to Toronto"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93063.pdf

Speakers

Anthony Fernando, Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario
Andy Manahan, Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario
Ken Tanenbaum
Lila Karim, North York Arts
Ely Rosenblum, North York Arts
Mike Wieninger, PCL Construction
Claire Hopkinson, Toronto Arts Foundation
Lis Pimentel, UNITE HERE, Local 75
Geoffrey Wilson, CEO, Ports Toronto
Alex Beduz, Chief of Staff, Toronto Region Board of Trade
Briane Nasimok
Cynthia Wilkey, West Don Lands Committee
John Wilson, West Don Lands Committee
Andrew Flint, Executive Director, Liberty Village Business Improvement Area
John Tevlin
Phil Gillies, Member, Expo Steering Committee
Janet Grant, Director, Events, MaRs Discovery District
Elsa Fancello, Development Manager, Castlepoint Numa
Marcello Cabezas
Kendra Fitzrandolph
Daniel Tisch, Argyle Public Relationships
Alexander Josephson, Partisans Architecture
Dave Leonard
Mark Kerwin, Alleyway of Dreams Project, East Toronto
Ken Bryan
Natalie Kaiser
Andre Morriseau, Canadian Council for Aboriginal Business (CCAB)
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Councillor Mary Fragedakis
Councillor Frances Nunziata

Communications (Committee)

(May 17, 2016) Letter from Ann MacDiarmid (EX.Supp.EX15.7.1)
(May 19, 2016) E-mail from Julie Beddoes (EX.Supp.EX15.7.2)
(May 19, 2016) E-mail from Rollo Myers (EX.Supp.EX15.7.3)
(May 24, 2016) E-mail from Geoffrey Wilson (EX.Supp.EX15.7.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-60884.pdf
(May 20, 2016) Letter from the EXPO 2025 Canada Industry Coalition submitted by Anthony Fernando (EX.Supp.EX15.7.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-60908.pdf
(May 19, 2016) Letter from Suzanne Kavanagh, President, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (EX.Supp.EX15.7.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-60913.pdf
(May 20, 2016) Letter from Michael Brewer, Vice President, Gooderham and Worts Neighbourhood Association Inc. (EX.Supp.EX15.7.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61025.pdf
(May 20, 2016) Letter from Cynthia Wilkey and John Wilson, Co-Chairs, West Don Lands Committee (EX.Supp.EX15.7.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61026.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from Jonathan Moser, Chair, Toronto Port Working Group (EX.Supp.EX15.7.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61027.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from Miriam Kramer, Manager, Government Relations, Ontario College of Art and Design University (EX.Supp.EX15.7.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61030.pdf
(May 24, 2016) E-mail from Dennis Findlay (EX.New.EX15.7.11)
(May 20, 2016) Letter from Bob Blazevski, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Diamondcorp (EX.Supp.EX15.7.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61036.pdf
(May 19, 2016) Letter from Michele Cummings, President, Corktown Residents and Business Association (CRBA) (EX.Supp.EX15.7.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61037.pdf
(May 23, 2016) E-mail from Tim McLaughlin, Steam Whistle (EX.Supp.EX15.7.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61038.pdf
(May 23, 2016) E-mail from Dave Steinberg (EX.Supp.EX15.7.15)
(May 23, 2016) E-mail from Anjum Sultana (EX.Supp.EX15.7.16)
(May 22, 2016) Letter from Paola Gomez, Co-founder, Sick Muse Art Projects (EX.Supp.EX15.7.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61041.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from Elsa Fancello, Development Manager, Castlepoint Numa (EX.Supp.EX15.7.18)
(May 19, 2016) Letter from Greg Tanzola, Vice President of Operations and Andrew Sorbara, Director of Special Projects (EX.Supp.EX15.7.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61043.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from William K. Fleissig, President and Chief Executive Officer, Waterfront Toronto (EX.Supp.EX15.7.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61044.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from Robert Cohen, President, Media Headquarters Film and Television Inc. (EX.Supp.EX15.7.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61045.pdf
(May 24, 2016) Letter from Elsa Fancello, Development Manager, Castlepoint Numa (EX.New.EX15.7.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61065.pdf
(May 24, 2016) E-mail from David Jackson (EX.New.EX15.7.23)
(May 24, 2016) E-mail from Alexis Kane Speer (EX.New.EX15.7.24)
(May 24, 2016) Submission from Mike Yorke, Carpenters and Allied Workers Local 27 (EX.New.EX15.7.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61068.pdf
(May 19, 2016) Letter from the Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, Prime Minister of Canada, private sector support signatures, business leaders in construction, design and infrastrucutre sector, and David Crombie, submitted by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam (EX.New.EX15.7.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61072.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(May 25, 2016) E-mail from Ken Bryan (CC.Main.EX15.7.27)
(May 24, 2016) Letter from Paul Bronfman, Chairman, Pinewood Toronto Studios and Chairman/Chief Executive Officer of Comweb Group Inc. and William F. White International Inc. (CC.Main.EX15.7.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61092.pdf
(May 31, 2016) E-mail from Anthony Sargent, Chief Executive Officer, Luminato Festival (CC.Main.EX15.7.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61107.pdf
(May 31, 2016) E-mail from Greg Tanzola, Vice President of Operations and Andrew Sorbara, Director of Special Projects, Sorbara Development Group (CC.Main.EX15.7.30)
(May 25, 2016) Letter from Mohamed Lachemi, President and Vice-Chancellor, Ryerson University (CC.Supp.EX15.7.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61129.pdf

EX15.8 - Development Charge Complaint - 165 Yorkland Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Statutory - Development Charges Act, SO 1997

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council determine that the Development Charges By-law has been properly applied to the non-residential development project located at 165 Yorkland Boulevard.

 

2.  City Council dismiss the complaint filed pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee held a statutory public meeting on May 24, 2016 and notice was given in accordance with the Development Charges Act.

Origin

(May 5, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report responds to a complaint filed pursuant to Section 20 of the Development Charges Act, 1997 relating to a non-residential development project located at 165 Yorkland Boulevard. 

 

The non-residential development that is the subject of this complaint includes a car dealership, workshop and storage area, as well as the head office of an automobile manufacturer. The City assessed the development as commercial space, and collected $682,382 as development charges for the ground floor gross floor area. Under the City's Development Charges By-law industrial uses are exempt. The complainant asserts that the automobile workshop and storage area are industrial uses and should be exempt from the City's development charges.

 

After reviewing the complaint, staff concludes that development charges payable were properly calculated at the time of building permit issuance and that there was no error in the application of the City's Development Charges By-law. This report recommends that the complaint be dismissed.  A decision of Council to dismiss the complaint may be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

In a matter unrelated to development charges, the complaint letter also contests the collection by the City of a park levy in the amount of $141,553.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 5, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Development Charge Complaint - 165 Yorkland Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92954.pdf
(February 23, 2016) Attachment 1 - Complaint Letter from Agellan Capital Partners Incorporated and Parkway Place Holdings Limited
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92955.pdf

Speakers

Alexander Pollich, President and Chief Executive Officer, Porsche Cars Canada Ltd.
Terra Artaro, Ageuan Captial Paramore
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(May 24, 2016) Submission from Alexander Pollich, President and Chief Executive Officer, Porsche Cars Canada Ltd. (EX.New.EX15.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61063.pdf

EX15.9 - Update on Metrolinx Proposed 18MW Gas Power Plant in Mount Dennis for Eglinton Crosstown LRT

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston
Attention
Communication EX15.9.2 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request Metrolinx, Crosslinx Transit Solutions, and Toronto Hydro to include staff from the City's Environment and Energy Division in their ongoing exploration of alternative energy options for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT Backup Power Facility near Mount Dennis Station.

 

2.  City Council request that Metrolinx confirm the intended operation of the proposed backup power facility, and specifically the following 3 operation modes and estimated number of hours per year:

 

a.  stand-by electrical supply in the event of an outage on the electrical utility system

 

b.  electrical peak shaving; and

 

c.  continuous operation.

 

3.  City Council request the Director, Environment and Energy to report to Executive Committee on the ongoing discussions set out in Recommendations 1 and 2 above.

Origin

(May 5, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

Community groups in Weston and Mount Dennis have voiced concerns over the Metrolinx/Crosslinx Transit Solutions proposed construction of an 18 megawatt (MW) natural gas power plant in their community which will provide backup power for the Eglinton LRT. See Attachment 1 for correspondence from the community groups Mount Dennis Community Association, The 12, and Blue Green Canada with Laura Albanese, MPP (York South-Weston).

 

City Council requested that staff from the Environment and Energy Division meet with Metrolinx, Crosslinx Transit Solutions and Toronto Hydro to discuss the Crosslinx plan for the power plant facility.  This report outlines the results of these meetings.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 5, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Update on Metrolinx Proposed 18MW Gas Power Plant in Mount Dennis for Eglinton Crosstown LRT
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92957.pdf
(May 5, 2016) Attachments 1 to 4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92958.pdf

Speakers

Judith Hayes, Mount Dennis Community Association
Bob Oliver, Tech-K.O., Inc.
Rick Ciccarelli, Toronto Community Benefits Network
Councillor Frances Nunziata

Communications (Committee)

(May 25, 2016) Letter from Rick Ciccarelli, Toronto Community Benefits Network (EX.New.EX15.9.1)

Communications (City Council)

(May 25, 2016) Submission from Bob Oliver, Chief Executive Officer, Tech-K.O., Incorporated. (CC.Main.EX15.9.2)

EX15.10 - Redevelopment of Toronto Transit Commission Lands at Yonge-Eglinton

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request Build Toronto, in consultation with Toronto Transit Commission, Real Estate Services and City Planning, to negotiate directly with the long-term lessee(s) located at Yonge and Eglinton regarding options for redeveloping the Lands, identified as Parts 1 to 4 in Appendix A to the report (May 5, 2016) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and to report back to City Council in the fourth quarter of 2016 with an evaluation of options and a recommended plan for advancing redevelopment.

 

2.  City Council request Build Toronto, as the project lead, to continue to consult with the local Councillors on recommended redevelopment options and alternatives through the process.

 

3.  City Council advise the Toronto Transit Commission Board of Council's support for consolidating and relocating Toronto Transit Commission offices.

 

4.  City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to exclude the Yonge and Eglinton lands from consideration for consolidated office space and/or a new head office.

 

5.  City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board, in consultation with Build Toronto and Real Estate Services, to consider options for a new head office and/or consolidated office space along the subway system throughout the City including Toronto/East York, Scarborough, North York, and Etobicoke districts.

 

6.  City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the letter (May 2, 2016) from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission [EX15.10a] remain confidential as it involves a proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes.

Origin

(May 5, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

To support potential City building opportunities, City staff are in the process of implementing a joint initiative involving the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), Build Toronto, Real Estate Services, and City Planning to facilitate redevelopment of TTC-owned lands at Yonge-Eglinton (known as "the Lands" and identified as Parts 1 to 4 in Appendix A). This report recommends that Build Toronto (including Toronto Transit Commission and City staff) negotiate with long-term tenants on the Lands and report back to City Council in the fourth quarter of 2016 regarding options to enable redevelopment of the Lands as a mixed-use, transit-oriented hub. This report complements a report on the same initiative adopted by the Toronto Transit Commission Board on April 27, 2016, entitled "Redevelopment of Toronto Transit Commission Lands at Yonge-Eglinton."

Background Information (Committee)

(May 5, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Redevelopment of Toronto Transit Commission Lands at Yonge-Eglinton
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92960.pdf
Appendix A - Property Sketch
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92961.pdf
Appendix B - Aerial View and Current Uses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92962.pdf

10a - Toronto Transit Commission - Redevelopment of Toronto Transit Commission Lands at Yonge-Eglinton

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes
Origin
(May 2, 2016) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission
Summary

At its meeting on Wednesday, April 27, 2016 the Toronto Transit Commission Board considered the attached report entitled "Redevelopment of TTC Lands at Yonge-Eglinton".

 

The Board approved the recommendations in the staff report, as follows:

 

"It is recommended that the Board:

 

1.  Receive the confidential information as set out in the confidential attachment;

 

2.  Authorize staff to participate in the Yonge-Eglinton Steering Committee with roles noted in the report;

 

3.  Endorse the guiding principles with respect to the redevelopment of the lands as listed in Attachment 2.

 

4.  Request staff to report back in the fourth quarter of 2016 on recommended arrangements for redevelopment including commercial terms.

 

5.  Forward this report, along with the Board’s decision, to the City of Toronto’s Executive Committee for its consideration with its report on the same subject.

 

6.  Authorize that the information provided in the confidential attachment is to remain confidential until completion of any transactions relating to the sale or redevelopment of the lands".

               

The Board also approved the following motion:

 

i.  That this report also be forwarded to the Chief Corporate Officer, City of Toronto. In accordance with Part 5 of the report recommendation the foregoing is submitted for your further handling.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 2, 2016) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer on Redevelopment of Toronto Transit Commission Lands at Yonge-Eglinton
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92761.pdf
(April 27, 2016) Report from the Chief Executive Officer on Redevelopment of Toronto Transit Commission Lands at Yonge-Eglinton
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92762.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

EX15.13 - Toronto 2017 Plans for the 150th Anniversary of Canadian Confederation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Items EX15.13 and ED12.3 to be considered together

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Manager, as part of the planning for the 150th Anniversary of Canadian Confederation, to:

 

a.  include recognition of the history of colonization in Canada through acknowledgement in communications and at all major events with content that is specific to the Aboriginal heritage of Toronto (Toronton and Tkaronto); and

 

b.  identify funding for the Aboriginal content.

Origin

(May 2, 2016) Letter from the Aboriginal Affairs Committee

Summary

At its meeting on May 2, 2016, the Aboriginal Affairs Committee considered Plans for the 150th Anniversary of Canadian Confederation.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 2, 2016) Letter from the Aboriginal Affairs Committee on Toronto 2017 Plans for the 150th Anniversary of Canadian Confederation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92829.pdf

EX15.14 - Funding for Relocation of Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct that the funds for the sale of 1 Hollis Street be deposited to the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund and earmarked for use for the permanent replacement of 1 Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre.

 

2.  City Council amend the 2016-2025 Capital Plan and the 2016 Capital Budget for Children's Services by adding a new capital project of $9.0 million gross fully funded from the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103), and named Mount Dennis Early Learning and Child Care Centre, for the permanent replacement of  Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre with a cash flow budget of $3.5 million in 2016; $4.5 million in 2017; and $1.0 million in 2018, with the purchase of property and design costs to be allocated to 2016 year and the remainder of costs to the 2017 and 2018 years.

 

3.  City Council amend the 2016 Approved Operating Budget for Children's Services by adding $0.950 million gross, $0 net, funded from the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund for the retrofit of the leased interim operating space replacing the Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre which is located at 1296 Weston Road.

 

4.  City Council direct that further funds due to the City from Metrolinx in relation to the replacement of Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre and costs of the retrofit and operation of the interim site also be deposited to the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund and allocated to the Mount Dennis Early Learning and Child Care Centre Capital Project and the Operating Budget for Children's Services in a manner acceptable to the General Manager, Children's Services and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

Origin

(April 26, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The property occupied by the Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre, a purpose built Centre directly operated by the City of Toronto, is to be sold to Metrolinx in mid-August as part of the Master Agreement between the City of Toronto and Metrolinx for the development of the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rapid Transit project. The site will become part of the Mount Dennis entrance to the system.  Metrolinx is obligated as part of the agreement to fund the costs of the relocation of the child care program.

 

This report requests the creation of a capital project for the relocation of the Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre by amending the 2016-2025 Capital Budget and Plan as well as an adjustment to the 2016 Approved Operating Budget for Children's Services to allow for the retrofit of an interim location for the operation of the child care pending construction of a new site.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 26, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee on Funding for Relocation of Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92607.pdf
(April 12, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Children's Services and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Funding for Relocation of Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92606.pdf

EX15.15 - Adjustment to the 2016 - 2025 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and Plan to Fund the Acquisition of 47 Cedarcrest Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
31 - Beaches-East York

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adjust the 2016-2025 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and Plan by adding a new capital sub-project known as "Acquisition of 47 Cedarcrest Boulevard" with a cash flow identified in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2016) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to be funded from the Parkland Acquisition – East York Local Land Reserve Fund (XR2033) until depleted, the Parkland Acquisition – East York Reserve Fund (XR2055) until depleted; with the balance from Parkland Acquisition South District Local Land Reserve Fund (XR2208).

 

2.  City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2016) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation remain confidential under the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to the acquisition by the City of property.

 

3.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information and recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 11, 2016) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation following the closing of any purchase transaction.

Origin

(April 26, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority from City Council to adjust the 2016 – 2025 Capital Budget and Plan for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by creating a new capital sub-project, in the Land Acquisition project, to fund the acquisition of 47 Cedarcrest Boulevard for parkland purposes.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 26, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee on Adjustment to the 2016 - 2025 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and Plan to Fund the Acquisition of 47 Cedarcrest Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92611.pdf
(April 11, 2016) Report and Attachment 2 from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Adjustment to the 2016 - 2025 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and Plan to Fund the Acquisition of 47 Cedarcrest Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92608.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

EX15.16 - Adjustments to the Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2016 Capital Budget and 2017-2025 Capital Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 36 - Scarborough Southwest

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the acceleration of previously approved cash flow from 2017 to 2016 within Parks, Forestry and Recreation's approved 2016 Capital Budget in the amount of $1.000 million, funded from development charges (XR2114) for the McCowan District Park Phase 2 Construction sub-project in the Parkland Development project.

 

2.  City Council authorize deferral of previously approved cash flow from 2016 to 2017 and 2018 within Parks, Forestry and Recreation's approved 2016 Capital Budget in the amount of $1.361 million for the Lawrence Heights Phase 1a Baycrest Park sub-project in the Parkland Development project, with $0.100 million deferred to 2017 (funded by development charges XR2114), and $1.261 million deferred to 2018 ($0.076 million from City Wide Parkland Development Cash-in-lieu reserve fund XR2211 and $1.185 million from development charges XR2114).

 

3.  City Council authorize deferral of cash flow from 2016 to 2017 within Parks, Forestry and Recreation's approved 2016 Capital Budget in the amount of $2.000 million for the College Park Artificial Ice Rink (AIR) sub-project in the Arena project, funded by $1.000 million in donations and $1.000 million from the Section 42 Alternate Rate (AR) Cash-in-lieu (CIL) for 460 Yonge Street (XR2213-4200658).

Origin

(April 26, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority from City Council to amend the approved 2016-2025 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget and Plan by adjusting project cash flows contained within the Budget and Plan.  The adjustments will not change debt funding for the 2016 Capital Budget and will align with capital project delivery schedules and program requirements.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 26, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee on Adjustments to the Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2016 Capital Budget and 2017-2025 Capital Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92614.pdf
(April 6, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Adjustments to the Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2016 Capital Budget and 2017-2025 Capital Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92612.pdf

EX15.17 - Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy 2016 Capital Budget and 2016 - 2025 Capital Plan Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals (Second Quarter)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy's 2016 Approved Capital Budget in the amount of $0.918 million, as illustrated in Schedule A to the report (April 7, 2016) from the Chief Corporate Officer, with zero gross and net debt impact.

 

2.  City Council authorize the deferral and acceleration of funds in Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy's approved 2016 Capital Budget and 2017- 2025 Capital Plan in the amount of $1.127 million, as illustrated in Schedule B to the report (April 7, 2016) from the Chief Corporate Officer, with zero gross and net debt impact.

Origin

(April 26, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This report requests authority to amend the Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy's 2016 Approved Capital Budget and 2017-2025 Capital Plan.  The amendments will have zero gross and net debt impact corporately and will better align 2016 and future cash flows with Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy capital program requirements.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 26, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee on Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy 2016 Capital Budget and 2016 - 2025 Capital Plan Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals (Second Quarter)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92618.pdf
(April 7, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy 2016 Capital Budget and 2016 - 2025 Capital Plan Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals (Second Quarter)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92615.pdf
(April 26, 2016) Schedule A - 2016 Budget Adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92616.pdf
(April 26, 2016) Schedule B - Deferrals / Accelerations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92617.pdf

EX15.18 - Operating Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2016

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the budget adjustments detailed in Appendix F to the report (May 9, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to amend the 2016 Approved Operating Budget between Programs that have no impact to the 2016 Approved Net Operating Budget.

Origin

(May 9, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto Operating Variance for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 as well as year-end projections.  This report also requests Council's approval for amendments to the 2016 Approved Operating Budget between Programs that have no impact to the 2016 Approved Net Operating Budget to ensure accurate reporting and financial accountability. 

 

As noted in Table 1 below, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016, Tax Supported Operations reported a favourable net variance of $50.231 million or 6.6 percent and the year-end projected net variance is anticipated to be $21.963 million or 0.6 percent.

 

Table 1
Tax Supported Variance Summary ($ Millions)

 

(See Table 1 titled Tax Supported Variance Summary

in the Summary Section of the report dated April 29, 2016

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

The favourable year-to-date net variance was driven by:

 

- Transportation Services' under-spending due to decreased salt usage and lower contract costs in the winter maintenance program from mild winter conditions.

 

- Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's below planned gross expenditures in social housing subsidies for mortgage payments as well as operating and rent subsidies and delays in opening some purchase service shelter providers.

 

- Higher than budgeted revenue from the Municipal Land Transfer Tax, City Planning development fees, Parking Tag Enforcement Operations and Toronto Parking Authority Corporate Revenues also contributed to the year-to-date results.

 

- The positive net variance was partially offset by under-achieved revenue for the Toronto Transit Commission – Conventional Service arising from lower ridership and weaker than planned Toronto Hydro Dividend Payments.

 

Forecasts indicate that the year-end position will result in a net positive variance of $21.963 million or 0.6 percent which represents a decrease from the three month results.  The surplus is forecast to be significantly lower than past years and reflects 0.2 percent of total budgeted gross expenditures.  The expected net year-end position is largely due to the following:

 

- Higher than budgeted revenues from the Municipal Land Transfer Tax ($17.487 million)


- Increased revenue from a higher volume of development applications and review fees for City Planning ($2.555 million).


- Stronger than anticipated Toronto Parking Authority Corporate Revenues ($2.250 million).

Table 2 below summarizes the three month and year-end projected results for Rate Supported Programs.


Table 2
Rate Supported Variance Summary ($ Millions)

 

(See Table 2 titled Rate Supported Variance Summary

in the Summary Section of the report dated April 29, 2016

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

The year-to-date positive net variance of $21.035 million was driven by the following:

 

- Net variance for Toronto Water of $10.975 million, comprised of $6.680 million in lower expenditures due to under-spending in salaries and benefits as a result of vacancies, lower than anticipated demand for chemicals, electricity, professional and technical services as well as under-spending in the transfer costs of biosolids.  In addition revenues were higher by $4.294 million owing to stronger than anticipated volume of water sold. 

 

- Net variance of $7.394 million for Solid Waste Management Services largely from contracted services.  In addition, revenues were stronger than planned, driven by higher than expected volume of residential user fees, higher than planned tonnages of waste at transfer stations and higher tonnages of recyclable fiber product for resale at higher prices.  These gains were partially offset by delayed billing for processing of residual waste from recycling and yellow bag fees.

 

- Over-achieved net revenues for the Toronto Parking Authority of $2.667 million resulting from higher demand for on-street parking and off-street garages in the downtown fringe areas.

 

Rate Supported Programs collectively project a positive year-end net variance of $25.135 million, mostly from Toronto Water due to continued lower gross expenditures for salaries and benefits, lower than planned hydro rates and usages, and savings in chemicals combined with higher revenues from stronger than anticipated sale of water and increase in new water and service connections.

 

Table 3 below summarizes the vacancy rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and projections to year-end.

 

Table 3
Summary of Approved Complement
(Includes Capital and Operating Positions)

 

(See Table 3 titled Summary of Approved Complement

in the Summary Section of the report dated April 29, 2016

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

- As of March 31, 2016, the City recorded a vacancy rate of 3.2 percent after gapping for an approved complement of 54,499.2 positions.

 

- The forecasted year-end vacancy rate after gapping is projected to be 0.3 percent for an approved complement of 54,547.2 positions.

 

A more detailed analysis is provided in the Approved Complement Section of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 9, 2016) Report and Appendices A to G from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Operating Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92933.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(May 20, 2016) Submission from Tim Maguire, President, CUPE Local 79 (EX.Supp.EX15.18.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-61028.pdf

18a - Operating Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2016

Origin
(May 13, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee
Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto Operating Variance for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016 as well as year-end projections. This report also requests Council's approval for amendments to the 2016 Approved Operating Budget between Programs that have no impact to the 2016 Approved Net Operating Budget to ensure accurate reporting and financial accountability.

 

As noted in Table 1 below, for the three-month period ended March 31, 2016, Tax Supported Operations reported a favourable net variance of $50.231 million or 6.6 percent and the year-end projected net variance is anticipated to be $21.963 million or 0.6 percent.

 

Table 1
Tax Supported Variance Summary ($ Millions)

(See Table 1 titled Tax Supported Variance Summary

in the Summary Section of the report dated April 29, 2016

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

The favourable year-to-date net variance was driven by:

 

- Transportation Services' under-spending due to decreased salt usage and lower contract costs in the winter maintenance program from mild winter conditions.

 

- Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's below planned gross expenditures in social housing subsidies for mortgage payments as well as operating and rent subsidies and delays in opening some purchase service shelter providers.

 

- Higher than budgeted revenue from the Municipal Land Transfer Tax, City Planning development fees, Parking Tag Enforcement Operations and Toronto Parking Authority Corporate Revenues also contributed to the year-to-date results.

 

- The positive net variance was partially offset by under-achieved revenue for the Toronto Transit Commission – Conventional Service arising from lower ridership and weaker than planned Toronto Hydro Dividend Payments.

 

Forecasts indicate that the year-end position will result in a net positive variance of $21.963 million or 0.6 percent which represents a decrease from the three month results. The surplus is forecast to be significantly lower than past years and reflects 0.2 percent of total budgeted gross expenditures. The expected net year-end position is largely due to the following:

 

- Higher than budgeted revenues from the Municipal Land Transfer Tax ($17.487 million)


- Increased revenue from a higher volume of development applications and review fees for City Planning ($2.555 million).


- Stronger than anticipated Toronto Parking Authority Corporate Revenues ($2.250 million).

Table 2 below summarizes the three month and year-end projected results for Rate Supported Programs.


Table 2
Rate Supported Variance Summary ($ Millions)

(See Table 2 titled Rate Supported Variance Summary

in the Summary Section of the report dated April 29, 2016

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

The year-to-date positive net variance of $21.035 million was driven by the following:

 

- Net variance for Toronto Water of $10.975 million, comprised of $6.680 million in lower expenditures due to under-spending in salaries and benefits as a result of vacancies, lower than anticipated demand for chemicals, electricity, professional and technical services as well as under-spending in the transfer costs of biosolids. In addition revenues were higher by $4.294 million owing to stronger than anticipated volume of water sold.

 

- Net variance of $7.394 million for Solid Waste Management Services largely from contracted services. In addition, revenues were stronger than planned, driven by higher than expected volume of residential user fees, higher than planned tonnages of waste at transfer stations and higher tonnages of recyclable fiber product for resale at higher prices. These gains were partially offset by delayed billing for processing of residual waste from recycling and yellow bag fees.

 

- Over-achieved net revenues for the Toronto Parking Authority of $2.667 million resulting from higher demand for on-street parking and off-street garages in the downtown fringe areas.

Rate Supported Programs collectively project a positive year-end net variance of $25.135 million, mostly from Toronto Water due to continued lower gross expenditures for salaries and benefits, lower than planned hydro rates and usages, and savings in chemicals combined with higher revenues from stronger than anticipated sale of water and increase in new water and service connections.

Table 3 below summarizes the vacancy rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and projections to year-end.

 

Table 3
Summary of Approved Complement
(Includes Capital and Operating Positions)

(See Table 3 titled Summary of Approved Complement

in the Summary Section of the report dated April 29, 2016

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

- As of March 31, 2016, the City recorded a vacancy rate of 3.2 percent after gapping for an approved complement of 54,499.2 positions.

 

- The forecasted year-end vacancy rate after gapping is projected to be 0.3 percent for an approved complement of 54,547.2 positions.

 

A more detailed analysis is provided in the Approved Complement Section of this report.

 

Background Information (Committee)
(May 13, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee on Operating Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93061.pdf

EX15.19 - Capital Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2016

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive for information Appendix 2 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer which lists 20 completed capital projects/sub-projects to be closed, resulting in a total combined project budget savings of $33.237 million.

 

2.  City Council approve in-year budget adjustments to the 2016-2024 Approved Capital Budget and Plan detailed in Appendix 3 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer with no incremental impact on debt funding.

 

3.  City Council approve an amendment to the 2016 Approved Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture adding a new capital project (Downtown Yonge BIA Special Project) with cash flow of $0.250 million in 2016 funded from the Capital Financing Reserve Fund through proceeds arising from a joint venture agreement for a new parking facility in Ward 27.

 

4.  City Council approve additional carry forward funding of $0.5 million for Exhibition Place, in order to continue work on previously approved capital projects, and reduction of $1.456 million for Facilities Management in previously approved carry forward funding as detailed in Appendix 5 to the report (May 9, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and that the 2016 Approved Capital Budget for respective City Program and Agency be adjusted accordingly with no incremental net impact on debt.

Origin

(May 9, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto Capital Variance for the three month period ended March 31, 2016, as well as projected actual expenditures to December 31, 2016. Furthermore, this report seeks Council's approval for in-year budget adjustments to the 2016 Approved Capital Budget and changes to previously approved 2015 carry forward funding.

 

The report also identifies 20 completed capital projects with a combined budget of $83.100 million that are ready to be closed and have been completed under budget, resulting in savings of $33.237 million that will be returned to their original funding sources, including a savings of $0.042 million in debt funding, $10.130 million in reserve/reserve funds funding, $0.004 million in federal subsidies, $10.159 million in provincial funding, $0.187 million in CFC funding and $12.713 million in other funding (including TO2015 and donations).

 

Table 1
Three Months and Year End Projected Spending Rate

 

2016 Approved Budget

Actual Expenditures - January 1 to March 31, 2016

Projected Actual Expenditure at Year-End

$000s

%

$000s

%

Tax Supported

        3,682,871

              211,804

5.8%

         3,149,191

85.5%

Rate Supported Programs:

        1,034,364

                65,533

6.3%

            881,221

85.2%

TOTAL

      4,717,234

            277,337

5.9%

       4,030,412

85.4%

 

The spending pattern for the first three months of 2016 is consistent with prior years as capital activity in the first months of the year is typically more preparatory. As detailed by City Program and Agency in Appendix 1, actual expenditures to year-end are expected to reach $4.030 billion or 85.4 percent of the total 2016 Approved Capital Budget. Twenty nine of 32 City Programs and Agencies are projecting spending in excess of 70 percent by year-end: Tax Supported Programs project a spending rate of 85.5 percent to year-end; while Rate Supported Programs project year-end spending rate of 85.2 percent.

 

Chart 1
2010 – 2016 Capital Budget Spend Rate

 

(See Chart 1 titled 2010 – 2016 Capital Budget Spend Rate

in the Summary Section of the report dated May 6, 2016

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)


Over the past 5 years both the approved capital budget (including carry forward funding) and the actual spending have been trending at a relatively steady rate, resulting in an average spending rate of 62 percent as outlined in Chart 1 above.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 9, 2016) Report and Appendices 1 to 5 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Capital Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92934.pdf
Appendix 6 - Capital Dashboard for Programs/Agencies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92935.pdf

19a - Capital Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2016

Origin
(May 13, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee
Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto Capital Variance for the three month period ended March 31, 2016, as well as projected actual expenditures to December 31, 2016. Furthermore, this report seeks Council's approval for in-year budget adjustments to the 2016 Approved Capital Budget and changes to previously approved 2015 carry forward funding.

 

The report also identifies 20 completed capital projects with a combined budget of $83.100 million that are ready to be closed and have been completed under budget, resulting in savings of $33.237 million that will be returned to their original funding sources, including a savings of $0.042 million in debt funding, $10.130 million in reserve/reserve funds funding, $0.004 million in federal subsidies, $10.159 million in provincial funding, $0.187 million in CFC funding and $12.713 million in other funding (including TO2015 and donations).

 

Table 1
Three Months and Year End Projected Spending Rate

2016 Approved Budget

Actual Expenditures - January 1 to March 31, 2016

Projected Actual Expenditure at Year-End

$000s

%

$000s

%

Tax Supported

3,682,871

211,804

5.8%

3,149,191

85.5%

Rate Supported Programs:

1,034,364

65,533

6.3%

881,221

85.2%

TOTAL

4,717,234

277,337

5.9%

4,030,412

85.4%

 

The spending pattern for the first three months of 2016 is consistent with prior years as capital activity in the first months of the year is typically more preparatory. As detailed by City Program and Agency in Appendix 1, actual expenditures to year-end are expected to reach $4.030 billion or 85.4 percent of the total 2016 Approved Capital Budget. Twenty nine of 32 City Programs and Agencies are projecting spending in excess of 70 percent by year-end: Tax Supported Programs project a spending rate of 85.5 percent to year-end; while Rate Supported Programs project year-end spending rate of 85.2 percent.

 

Chart 1
2010 – 2016 Capital Budget Spend Rate

(See Chart 1 titled 2010 – 2016 Capital Budget Spend Rate

in the Summary Section of the report dated May 6, 2016

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)


Over the past 5 years both the approved capital budget (including carry forward funding) and the actual spending have been trending at a relatively steady rate, resulting in an average spending rate of 62 percent as outlined in Chart 1 above.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 13, 2016) Letter from the Budget Committee on Capital Variance Report for the Three-Month Period Ended March 31, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93062.pdf

EX15.20 - Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee Request respecting the 2016 Accessibility Plan Status Report from the Toronto Transit Commission

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to request the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to apply a full safety audit using a gender-specific lens, when reviewing its accessibility audit, to address safety concerns of women and women with disabilities and report to the December 6, 2016 Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee meeting.

Origin

(April 19, 2016) Letter from the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee

Summary

At its meeting on April 19, 2016, the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee considered the 2016 Accessibility Plan Status Report from the Toronto Transit Commission.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 19, 2016) Letter from the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee on 2016 Accessibility Plan Status Report - Toronto Transit Commission
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92683.pdf
(March 2, 2016) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission on 2016 Accessibility Plan Status Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92669.pdf
(February 25, 2016) Attachment - Report from the Toronto Transit Commission Board on 2016 Accessibility Plan Status Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92670.pdf
(April 19, 2016) Presentation from the Senior Planner, System Accessibility, Toronto Transit Commission on the 2016 Accessibility Status Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92671.pdf

EX15.21 - Request for Provincial Review of Special Investigations Unit Processes for Cases Involving Individuals Living with Mental Illness

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Premier, the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services, and the Ontario Civilian Police Commission to review the mandate, procedures and outcomes of the Special Investigations Unit with respect to the treatment of cases that involve individuals who are living with mental illness or experiencing a mental health crisis and those who live with communication differences and all other forms of disabilities under the Human Rights Code.

 

2. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to request the Chief of Police to give a presentation to the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee on how the police are trained to interact with persons with disabilities.

Origin

(April 19, 2016) Letter from the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee

Summary

City Council passed MM17.32 on April 1st, 2016 to request the Premier, the Minister Responsible for Anti-Racism and the new Anti-Racism Directorate, the Minister of Community Safety and Correctional Services, and the Ontario Civilian Police Commission to review with an anti-black racism and anti-racism lens the manner in which police services are provided within the City of Toronto; and the mandate, procedures and outcomes of the Special Investigations Unit (SIU) with respect to the treatment of cases that involve victims from racialized communities.

 

While the summary of the motion speaks to mental health as a factor in many deaths involving Toronto Police Services, the motion does not specifically include a request for a review SIU investigations involving individuals who may have been living with mental illness or experiencing a mental health crisis.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 19, 2016) Letter from the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee on Request for Provincial Review of Special Investigations Unit Processes for Cases Involving Individuals Living with Mental Illness
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92673.pdf
(April 12, 2016) Letter from Councillor Wong-Tam on Request of the Province and the Minister Responsible for Anti-Racism to ensure Police Services and Investigations are Fair and Transparent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92672.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(May 20, 2016) E-mail from Janice Bryan (EX.Supp.EX15.21.1)

EX15.22 - Toronto Police Service - 2015 Annual Hate/Bias Crime Statistical Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to request the Chief of Police to consider:

 

a.  issuing the Annual Hate/Bias Crime Statistical Report in a format compatible to the Open by Default Standard of the Province of Ontario;

 

b.  commencing with the 2015 Report, having the Annual Hate/Bias Crime Statistical Report placed in the City of Toronto Open Data Portal as a dataset; and

 

c.  submitting a progress report to the Toronto Police Service Board on July 21, 2016.

Origin

(April 5, 2016) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Executive Committee with the Toronto Police Service's 2015 Annual Hate/Bias Crime Statistical Report.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 5, 2016) Report and Appendix A from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Toronto Police Service - 2015 Annual Hate/Bias Crime Statistical Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92029.pdf

EX15.23 - Overhaul of 30 Canadian Light Rail Vehicles and Maintaining Non-Overhauled Streetcars in a State of Good Repair

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the overhaul of thirty (30) Canadian Light Rail Vehicles (CLRVs) as a Capital Project at an estimated final cost of $9.1 million.

 

2.  City Council approve the refurbishment of critical mechanical, pneumatic and electrical components to maintain the non-overhauled Canadian Light Rail Vehicles (CLRVs) in a state of good repair at an operating cost of $17.5 million.

 

3.  City Council approve the refurbishment of critical mechanical, pneumatic and electrical components to maintain the non-overhauled Articulated Light Rail Vehicles (ALRVs) in a state of good repair at an operating cost of $7.5 million.

Origin

(April 4, 2016) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission

Summary

At its meeting on Wednesday, March 23, 2016 the Toronto Transit Commission Board considered the attached report entitled, "Overhaul of 30 Canadian Light Rail Vehicles (CLRV) and Maintaining non-Overhauled Streetcars in a State of Good Repair". The Board approved the recommendation in the staff report, as follows:

 

It is recommended that the Toronto Transit Commission Board approve:

 

1.  Overhaul of thirty (30) Canadian Light Rail Vehicles (CLRVs) as a Capital Project at an estimated final cost (EFC) of $9.1 million;

 

2.  Refurbishment of critical mechanical, pneumatic and electrical components to maintain the non-overhauled CLRVs in a state of good repair at an operating cost of $17.5 million;

 

3.  Refurbishment of critical mechanical, pneumatic and electrical components to maintain the non-overhauled Articulated Light Rail Vehicles (ALRVs) in a state of good repair at an operating cost of $7.5 million;

 

4.  Staff to proceed with the identified work in advance of Council approval in order to meet and maintain Streetcar service;

 

5.  Staff to accrue costs and apply these costs to future claims allowed for in the Bombardier Transportation contract under liquidated damages; and

 

6.  Submission of this report to City of Toronto Council for approval.

 

The foregoing is forwarded for the approval of City of Toronto Council.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 4, 2016) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission on Overhaul of 30 Canadian Light Rail Vehicles and Maintaining Non-Overhauled Streetcars in a State of Good Repair
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92031.pdf
(March 23, 2016) Report from the Chief Executive Officer on Overhaul of 30 Canadian Light Rail Vehicles (CLRV) and Maintaining Non-Overhauled Streetcars in a State of Good Repair
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-92032.pdf

EX15.27 - City of Toronto's Response to Bill 204

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request Toronto's Housing Advocate, Councillor Ana Bailão, to lead the City's response to Bill 204, An Act to amend or repeal various Acts with respect to housing and planning in consultation with Chair, Community Development Committee on the amendments to the Housing Services Act, and in consultation with the Chair, Planning and Growth Management Committee on the preparation of the City's submission to the Province's Inclusionary Zoning Consultation Guide.

Origin

(May 24, 2016) Letter from Mayor Tory

Summary

On May 18th, 2016 the Province introduced Bill 204, an Act to amend or repeal various Acts with respect to housing and planning. The legislation is intended to promote social and affordable housing through proposed changes to the Planning Act, the Development Charges Act and the Housing Services Act.
 
Once these changes are in effect, they will among other matters, enable municipalities to implement inclusionary zoning.  They will also exempt secondary suites in new homes from development charges and give social housing managers more administrative and operational flexibility.
 
As you are aware, Toronto City Council has on numerous occasions called for the legislative authority to require new affordable housing as part of new residential developments.  The Provincial announcement is very welcomed news as the Province has taken a progressive first step by introducing inclusionary zoning legislation.
 
The proposed changes to the Housing Services Act also respond to some of the findings of the Mayor's Task Force on Toronto Community Housing.  In addition to introducing Bill 204, the Province has also released an Inclusionary Zoning Consultation Discussion Guide and requested responses on the discussion questions by August 16, 2016.  It is also anticipated that the draft inclusionary zoning regulations will be shortly released.
 
Given the City's interest in Bill 204 and the provincial consultations, I am recommending to the Executive Committee that Toronto's Housing Advocate, Councillor Ana Bailão, lead the City's response, in consultation with the Chair of the Planning and Growth Committee and the Chair of the Community Development Committee.
 
In preparing the City's response to Bill 204 Councillor Bailao would consult with members of Council and be supported by City officials.  She would also engage relevant stakeholders.  Staff will also be assessing and reporting on the planning implications of the new legislation.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 24, 2016) Letter from Mayor Tory on City of Toronto's Response to Bill 204
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93366.pdf

EX15.28 - College Promenade Business Improvement Area Streetscape Project Financing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Second item of business following the Mayor's Key Matter on Tuesday, June 7

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve an exception to the Business Improvement Area (BIA) Capital Cost-Sharing Guidelines under the Financed Funding Option for the College Promenade BIA Project to increase the financed funding for the Project by $1.063 million from $1.250 million to $2.313 million to be re-paid to the City with interest over a period of up to 10 years.

Origin

(May 16, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

In August 2015 the College Promenade Business Improvement Area (BIA) applied for funding of $1.950 million gross through the BIA Cost-Share Financed Funding option for streetscape improvements to College Street from Shaw Street to Havelock Street as part of a larger contract including contributions from Public Realm, Urban Forestry, Transportation Services and Civic Design.

 

Under the Financed Funding option, Economic Development and Culture's contribution is capped at $0.350 million.  The remaining $1.600 million was to be funded with $0.350 million from savings the BIA has accumulated in its reserves and $1.250 million from a loan financed by the City.  The project was approved by City Council in the 2016 Economic Development and Culture Capital Budget.

 

When the project was tendered in April, the lowest bid for the BIA Financed Funding component of the project was $3.013 million.  Awarding of the contract would require an increase to the financed amount by $1.063 million, from $1.250 million to $2.313 million.  An exception is required to the BIA Capital Cost-Sharing Program Guidelines, which caps the total amount of outstanding loans to any single BIA at any given time at $2.000 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 16, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager Economic Development and Culture on College Promenade Business Improvement Area Streetscape Project Financing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93274.pdf

EX15.29 - Earthquake Disaster Relief Assistance for Ecuador

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager to forward the item to the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) and request that the Federation of Canadian Municipalities report back on actions that would recognize the affected areas of Ecuador for technical support for longer term capacity building. 

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager to consider opportunities for aid partners and non-governmental agencies such as Ecuadorian community organizations, to support community local rebuilding efforts in accordance with the Friendship and Cooperation Agreement between the City of Toronto and City of Quito.

 

3. City Council request the Federal Government, in coordination with both the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Canadian Red Cross to address challenges associated with relief efforts that typically fall short on the availability of skilled people to assist with disaster relief efforts.

Origin

(May 18, 2016) Report from the City Manager

Summary

On April 16, 2016, a 7.8 magnitude earthquake shook Ecuador and was followed by a series of aftershocks.  In response, City Council on May 3, 2016 adopted Member Motion 18.43 which requested that staff report back to the May 24, 2016 Executive Committee on options to provide Ecuador immediate and long term assistance by the City of Toronto in keeping with the City's International Disaster Relief Policy, including technical staff expertise and supporting community efforts to raise funds and to assist in relief efforts. This report responds to this request.

 

The motion also requested that the Government of Canada increase significantly the $2 million set aside for earthquake relief in Ecuador, and that City Council consider any formal requests from the Office of the Fire Marshal and Emergency Management Ontario and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) to assist in providing disaster relief assistance that may be deemed urgent. To date, the City has not received any formal requests.

 

The City's response to international disasters is guided by the City's International Disaster Relief Policy which provides the framework for the City’s response to communities in need following a disaster.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 18, 2016) Report from the City Manager on Earthquake Disaster Relief Assistance for Ecuador
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-93362.pdf

Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 12

CD12.2 - Ontario Green Investment Fund Benefitting Social Housing - Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the acceptance of $42,948,037 from the Province as a one-time capital allocation for renovation and retrofit of eligible social housing buildings to deliver the Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program (SHARP).

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to enter into a Transfer Payment or similar Agreement with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing for social housing apartment retrofit funding on terms and conditions addressing funding and monitoring, energy audit and reporting requirements satisfactory to the General Manager and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council amend the 2016 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration  by $1,100,000 gross and $0 net, funded from the Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program, to pay for the cost of Ashrae Level 3 energy audits for proposed retrofit projects in order to identify suitable buildings that will be funded under the Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program; and authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing, to enter into agreements with non-profit and co-operative housing providers, and /or private sector organizations to carry out the necessary energy audits and evaluations required.

 

4.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to utilize any administrative funding approved by the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing to administer the Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program implementation.

 

5.  City Council amend the 2016 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration by $137,500 gross and $0 net, funded from the Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program, to hire a full time temporary Project Manager and Agency Review Officer to assist with the administration of the Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program.

 

6.  City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee in October 2016, with a final list of retrofit projects and funding allocations to social housing providers, to deliver the approved projects in line with the terms and conditions of the agreement.

Origin

(May 3, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

Through Ontario’s Green Investment Fund (OGIF), the Province will make available $82 million for social housing providers across the province to complete retrofit projects which would reduce greenhouse gas (GHGs) emissions. The City's allocation for the Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program (SHARP) funding is $42,948,037.

 

This one-time investment presents a much needed investment in the improved efficiency and reduced carbon footprint of social housing high-rise buildings (150+ units) across the city.

 

To receive this funding, the City will be required to enter into a Transfer Payment Agreement with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) no later than June 15, 2016.  This report recommends actions necessary to deliver any funding approved.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 3, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Ontario Green Investment Fund Benefitting Social Housing - Social Housing Apartment Retrofit Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-92865.pdf

CD12.3 - Proposed Amendments to the Housing Services Act Related to the Provincial Long-Term Affordable Housing Strategy Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the positions on proposed amendments to the Housing Services Act and associated regulations to Ontario's Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing, as outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (May 3, 2016) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and/or his designate to engage in further consultation and input as more technical information is released by the Province.

Origin

(May 3, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

The provincial government released Ontario's Long Term Affordable Housing Strategy (LTAHS) Update in March 2016. The Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (MMAH) is proposing a number of amendments to legislation over the next 12 months to support changes to the housing system that are consistent with the themes of the LTAHS Update. Key provincial actions are legislative and regulatory amendments to the Housing Services Act associated regulations and the Ontario Housing Policy Statement, which provide a legislative framework for housing services in Ontario, as well as the eventual introduction of enabling legislation for inclusionary zoning.

 

This report provides preliminary analysis on the proposed changes, and seeks direction from City Council to provide further comments on the City's position on legislative and regulatory amendments to the Housing Services Act when more technical information has been released by the Province. A separate staff report will be brought forward by City staff on inclusionary zoning once additional information is released by the Province. While some of the proposed amendments to the Housing Services Act and associated regulations include welcome changes that give the City of Toronto and other Municipal Service Managers more flexibility to meet local needs and reduce administrative burden, many of the substantial changes required to transform and modernize the social housing system have not been addressed by the Province. MMAH has stated that further changes will be considered over the next 18 to 24 months.

 

Shelter, Support and Housing Administration staff will participate in ongoing consultation processes to provide comment on specific legislative and regulatory changes and continue to encourage the federal and provincial governments develop a fully-funded affordable housing strategy with sustainable, ongoing funding and flexibility to meet local needs, consistent with Council's requests.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 3, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Proposed Amendments to the Housing Services Act Related to the Provincial Long-Term Affordable Housing Strategy Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-92866.pdf

CD12.4 - Investment Funding Programs - 2016 Allocation Recommendations for Service Development and Improvement Program and Request for Approval for New Initiatives

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the allocation of $275,000 to eight returning multi-year funded organizations through the Service Development and Improvement Program (SDIP) as noted in Appendix A to the report (May 4, 2016) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to allocate, issue and enter into agreements for up to $395,000 in grants through a call for proposals to selected proponents and report back to Community Development and Recreation Committee on awards made to the selected grant recipients for the following initiatives:

 

i.  To pilot a certificate/college credit training program for residents from Neighbourhood Improvement Areas (NIAs) to advance Council approved Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 (TSNS 2020) and the Toronto Poverty Reduction Strategy through a Local Champions Pilot;

 

ii.  To pilot and evaluate a funding model for capacity-building supports (organizational mentors) to City-funded emerging/grassroots groups;

 

iii.  To a not-for-profit organization, in collaboration with Social Development, Finance and Administration, to develop a community hub strategy and feasibility study to address the needs of youth and seniors in Central Etobicoke; and

 

iv.  To a not-for-profit agency to develop the operations and financing model for an emerging community hub in Thorncliffe Park.

 

3.  City Council request Social Development, Finance and Administration to undertake a comprehensive review of the City's role, funding approaches, and policy implications of supporting community hubs in Toronto.

Origin

(May 4, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report recommends the allocation of funding for eight returning multi-year Service Development and Improvement Program (SDIP) projects.  The report also seeks Council authority to issue a call for proposals for four new initiatives to advance the Council TSNS 2020 and Toronto Poverty Reduction Strategies with funding from the Emerging Neighbourhood Fund. The report also requests delegated authority for the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to allocate funding of up to $395,000 from the Emerging Neighbourhood Fund to the selected grant recipients.

 

Grants help the City of Toronto achieve its social, economic and cultural goals for its residents. The City's goals are better achieved by supporting the work of organizations that are closer to the communities they serve.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 4, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Investment Funding Programs - 2016 Allocation Recommendations for Service Development and Improvement Program and Request for Approval for New Initiatives
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-92869.pdf
Appendix A - 2016 Service Development and Improvement Program Allocation Recommendations: Projects Recommended for Continued Funding
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-92871.pdf
Appendix B - 2016 Service Development and Improvement Program Allocation Recommendations: Summary of Projects Recommended for Continued Funding
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-92872.pdf

CD12.5 - 2016 Community Festivals and Special Events Investment Funding Program Appeals - Status of Applicant No. 53

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.   City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to allocate $2,000 for eligible costs from the 2016 Community Festivals and Special Events Investment Funding program to Mount Dennis Community Association to hold a community festival that showcases a fishing competition and sporting events in Eglinton Flats.

Origin

(May 4, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

Results of the 2016 Community Festivals and Special Events Appeals of applicant No. 53 is provided in this report as requested by City Council on March 31/April 1, 2016.

 

Grants help the City of Toronto achieve its social, economic and cultural goals for its residents. The City's goals are better achieved by supporting the work of organizations that are closer to the communities they serve.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 4, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on 2016 Community Festivals and Special Events Investment Funding Program Appeals - Status of Applicant No. 53
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-92873.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Frances Nunziata

CD12.6 - 2015 Allocations: Community Legacy Initiative, Follow-up

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CD12.6.7 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the amended amount of up to $75,000 of the previously approved $175,000 to the Hispanic Canadian Heritage Council for the development of a mobile application to support a Latin Food event and to co-ordinate Hispanic Heritage Month.

 

2.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to convene a meeting of key stakeholders, including interested Councillors, to determine how the City can best support the community dialogue on identity, and report back to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on September 20, 2016.

Origin

(May 4, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report provides an update on the Hispanic Canadian Heritage Council’s (HCHC) proposal for a grant under the Pan Am Games, Community Legacy Initiative (CLI).

 

At its meeting of Nov 3, 4, 2015 City Council authorized a grant of $175,000 for HCHC to enhance community cohesion, and support economic and social development. Stakeholder concerns were expressed in response to the awarding grant and Council directed staff to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on monitoring results on the grant.

 

In 2015 City Council initiated the Host City Showcase grant programs: Community Legacy Initiative (CLI), and Game On Toronto! (GOT). Toronto's Host City Showcase Programs support the legacy of the Toronto 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games. These grants support projects to profile and provide longer-term economic and/or social infrastructure benefits for Toronto’s Latin American, South American and Caribbean communities.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 4, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on 2015 Allocations: Community Legacy Initiative, Follow-up
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-92874.pdf

Speakers

Oscar Vigil, Executive Director, Hispanic Canadian Heritage Council
Eduardo Harari and Erika Aguilera, Latinlicious
Silvia Argentina Arauz, Co-Chair, Latin American Education Network (LAEN)
Claudio Ruiz Pilarte, President, The Hispanic Canadian Heritage Council
Paola Gomez, Sick Muse Art Projects
Councillor Jim Karygiannis
Councillor Frances Nunziata

Communications (Committee)

(May 17, 2016) E-mail from Oscar Vigil, Executive Director, Hispanic Canadian Heritage Council (HCHC) (CD.New.CD12.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-60712.pdf
(May 17, 2016) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio (CD.New.CD12.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-60786.pdf
(May 18, 2016) Letter from Silvia Argentina Arauz and Andrea Vásquez Jiménez, Co-Chairs, Latin American Education Network (LAEN) (CD.New.CD12.6.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-60787.pdf
(May 18, 2016) Submission from Eduardo Harari and Erika Aguilera, Latinlicious (CD.New.CD12.6.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-60791.pdf
(May 12, 2016) Submission from Councillor Jim Karygiannis (CD.New.CD12.6.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-60719.pdf
(February 10, 2016) Submission from Councillor Jim Karygiannis (CD.New.CD12.6.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-60720.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 7, 2016) Letter from Andrea Vásquez Jiménez and Silvia Argentina Arauz, Co-Chairs, Latin American Education Network (CC.New.CD12.6.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61153.pdf

Economic Development Committee - Meeting 12

ED12.1 - Mayor's Mission To Los Angeles: Growing Toronto's Screen Industry

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to lead a staff working group with representation  from City Planning, Real Estate Services, Transportation Services, Corporate Finance, Financial Planning, Toronto Port Lands Corporation, Build Toronto, Toronto Police Services, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and Toronto Parking Authority with the mandate to maximize the City's support for film and television production in Toronto by:

 

a.  reviewing infrastructure needs;

b.  improving customer service for industry and residents affected by filming; and

c.  enhancing crew training.

 

2.  City Council request Council members, in consultation with the Toronto Film, Television and Digital Media Board, to advocate for the city's film and television industry with other orders of government.

 

3.  City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, drawing from the results of the collaboration efforts in Recommendation 1 and in consultation with the Toronto Film, Television and Digital Media Board, to develop a multi-year implementation plan for added film and television production support, with timing, targets, and costs, aligned with other economic development strategies and priorities and subject to future budget approval processes.

Origin

(April 29, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report provides a summary of the activities and some key outcomes of the recent Mayor's mission to Los Angeles (LA) to promote the City's film and entertainment industries.

 

In order to strategically extend the City's relationship and to secure future investment in LA, the City of Toronto’s Film and Entertainment Industries staff and key representatives  of the local industry along with Mayor Tory and his staff, promoted its film, TV and post-production expertise during Screen Week from February 24-26, 2016.

 

While Vancouver and Montreal frequently and consistently promote their cities to the LA market, Toronto had not mounted a strategic campaign led by its Mayor since 2009.

 

Outcomes of the mission to LA point to five key areas of focus to ensure growth in Toronto's film and TV industry including: working cross-divisionally to provide consistent support to the industry; advocating to and working with other orders of government; reviewing infrastructure needs; improving customer service for industry and residents affected by filming; and enhancing crew training.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 29, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Mayor's Mission To Los Angeles: Growing Toronto's Screen Industry
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92804.pdf

ED12.2 - MaRS Discovery District and City of Toronto Economic Development Partnership

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to develop and sign a Memorandum of Understanding with MaRS Discovery District to establish an enhanced economic development partnership.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Karen Greve Young, Vice President, Partnerships MaRS gave a presentation to the Economic Development Committee.

Origin

(April 26, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The City has been collaborating with MaRS Discovery District (MaRS) to strengthen economic development in Toronto by supporting innovation and entrepreneurship. MaRS is a corporation whose mission is to foster innovation and support the creation and growth of successful global businesses from Canada’s science, technology and social innovation sectors.

 

The mandate and operations of MaRS closely aligns with the City’s approach to supporting Toronto’s startup ecosystem. The City continually strives to work with strong partners who can assist in having the greatest economic development impact (measured by new business formation, entrepreneurs supported, jobs created, etc.) and provide support to developing key sectors of the economy. To date, an informal partnership with MaRS has produced positive economic development activities that have enabled the formation and growth of companies in Toronto.

 

Through a formal Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), the capacity for MaRS and the City to strengthen the innovation and entrepreneurship community in Toronto would be significantly enhanced.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 26, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on MaRS Discovery District and City of Toronto Economic Development Partnership
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92791.pdf
Presentation from Karen Greve Young, Vice President, Partnerships (MaRS) on Scaling Innovation for Impact
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-93100.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Paul Ainslie

ED12.3 - Update on Planning for Canada 150

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Items EX15.13 and ED12.3 to be considered together.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to collaborate with other orders of government, the private sector, and the not-for-profit sector to promote and produce Canada 150 activities across the City of Toronto in 2017.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to coordinate marketing and communications efforts for Canada 150 programs undertaken by the City and its agencies.

 

3.  City Council delegate authority to the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, to make funding requests to the federal and provincial governments to support the Canada 150 programs, and if successful, to receive funds on behalf of the City and execute any contribution agreements required.

Origin

(May 2, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

2017 is the 150th Anniversary of Confederation. This report provides updates on the planning for Canada 150 celebrations in Toronto. A cross-divisional planning team has been established and submissions to outside funding sources are being prepared to supplement the City's commitment of $4.2 million over 2 years. Terms of Reference for a community advisory group have been developed and the recruitment of community members to serve will begin this spring. Previously approved Canada 150 capital projects are beyond the scope of this report except as noted in the decision history.

 

Economic Development and Culture Division (EDC) has proceeded with planning for New Year's Eve on December 31, 2016; and Canada 150 birthday celebrations on and around July 1, 2017 at Nathan Phillips Square, the North York Civic Centre, the Scarborough Civic Centre and Colonel Samuel Smith Park in Etobicoke. EDC events programming and support staff have prepared cost estimates for the above activities. EDC Museums and Heritage staff have prepared cost estimates for a proposed community heritage program under the broad theme "Becoming Canadian in Toronto". The total cost of the Canada 150 program is estimated at approximately $8.4 million gross over 2 years beginning in 2016. The City will contribute a maximum of $4.200 million, consistent with Council approval in December 2015 (ED8.9), to be funded by the Major Special Events Reserve Fund (MSERF).   Other levels of government and external sources are expected to contribute the remaining $4.2 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 2, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Update on Planning for Canada 150
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92805.pdf

ED12.4 - City of Toronto Bidding and Hosting Strategy for Significant Special Events

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Items EX15.7 and ED12.4 to be considered together.

Communication ED12.4.3 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the City of Toronto Bidding and Hosting Strategy for Significant Special Events, attached to the report (May 6, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as Appendix A.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to develop a long-term funding strategy and financing approaches for Category A and B special events, as defined in Appendix B to the report (May 6, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, for consideration as part of the 2017 budget process.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

1.  Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to assess the "Current Requests for Support for Significant Special Events", listed in the report (May 6, 2016) from the Executive Director, Economic Development and Culture, for 2016, 2017 and 2018, against the criteria in the City of Toronto Bidding and Hosting Strategy for Significant Special Events, in Appendix A, and report to the June 22, 2016 Economic Development Committee meeting.

Origin

(May 6, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The Mayor's Advisory Panel on International Hosting Opportunities identified two types of major special events – "Mega Events", referring to the Olympics (Winter and Summer), World Expos, and the FIFA World Cup, and "Global Community Events", a second tier of significant special events that will not capture the same market share or exposure as an Olympics, but that generate considerable benefits for Toronto in terms of economic and cultural impact, media exposure, community engagement, and trade opportunities.

 

This Strategy is put forward to guide future bidding and hosting of Global Community Events. This report defines a Global Community Event as a "significant special event" falling under Category A or B of the City of Toronto Standard Definitions for Special Events. These definitions, included in full in Appendix B, are summarized below.

 

­           Category A events are significant special events hosted in rotating jurisdictions on a cyclical basis, generating considerable economic benefits for the host region, and requiring substantial coordinating efforts from the host government. Recent examples include WorldPride (2014), the 100th Grey Cup Festival (2012), and the International Indian Film Academy Awards (2011).

 

­           Category B events include non-recurring special events of a slightly smaller scale, such as the IIHF World Junior Hockey Championship, as well as existing high-profile annual festivals such as the Toronto International Film Festival and the Toronto Caribbean Carnival.

 

The Mayor's Advisory Panel rightly noted that separate bidding and hosting strategies must be put in place for Mega Events and for Category A and B events. Mega Events differ significantly from Category A and B events on a range of factors, including scale, cost, capital requirements, and the City's role in the very extensive bidding process. Accordingly, this Strategy complements a separate report outlining considerations for bidding on and hosting Mega Events that will be considered by Executive Committee in May 2016, and City Council in June 2016.

 

The City of Toronto has a strong track record of hosting very successful Category A and B events that have generated significant economic impact, enhanced the City's global media profile, and left lasting, meaningful legacies for Toronto. Despite this track record of success, the City has no formal policies or procedures for bidding on or hosting Category A or B special events. Requests for support from event organizers are dealt with on an ad hoc basis, and the coordination of municipal services for events is negotiated informally by staff as needed. In addition, the City lacks a long-term strategy to fund bidding and hosting expenses for significant special events.

 

The City of Toronto Bidding and Hosting Strategy for Significant Special Events will address these gaps by proposing a new framework to manage and evaluate event hosting opportunities, and by identifying dedicated resources to bring high-value, high-impact events to Toronto. The Strategy will build on the successful legacy of the Pan Am Games by implementing a proactive approach to developing and promoting special event bids, and by positioning Toronto as a preferred host city for significant events and conventions.

 

This report also lists the notable number of requests for support that have recently been submitted to the City by Category A and B special events, and for which no source of funding currently exists.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 6, 2016) Report and Appendices A and B from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the City of Toronto Bidding and Hosting Strategy for Significant Special Events
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92769.pdf

Speakers

Shauna Levy, President, CEO, Design Exchange
Anthony Plummer, Caribbean Promotion Arts & Culture Inc.
Kevin Currie, Waterfront Business Improvement Area
Michael Burns, Chief Operating Officer, Invictus Games
Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Communications (Committee)

(May 16, 2016) Letter from Nancy Gavin, Chair, Water's Edge Festivals and Events (ED.New.ED12.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/comm/communicationfile-60773.pdf
(May 16, 2016) Submission from Anthony Plummer, Executive Director, Caribbean Promotions Arts and Culture Inc. (ED.New.ED12.4.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/comm/communicationfile-60774.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(May 30, 2016) Presentation from Michael Burns, Chief Executive Officer and Steve Wallace, Chief Marketing Officer, Invictus Games (CC.Main.ED12.4.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61094.pdf

ED12.5 - 2016 Major Cultural Organizations Allocations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the allocations of Major Cultural Organizations program funding of $8,069,960 to the following organizations:

 

Organization

Amount

Art Gallery of Ontario

$684,000

Canada's National Ballet School

$200,000

Canadian Opera Company

$1,600,000

Festival Management Committee

(Toronto Caribbean Carnival)

$625,000

George R. Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art

$155,265

National Ballet of Canada

$1,320,000

Pride Toronto

$260,000

Toronto Artscape Inc.                                  

$415,000

Toronto Festival of Arts, Culture and

Creativity (Luminato)                                  

$400,000

Toronto International Film Festival   

$1,140,695

Toronto Symphony Orchestra                     

$1,270,000

TOTAL

$8,069,960

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2.  City Council approve the balance of the 2016 instalment payments to the Art Gallery of Ontario, Canadian Opera Company, Festival Management Committee, National Ballet of Canada, Toronto Artscape Inc., Toronto International Film Festival Group, and Toronto Symphony Orchestra be made as one payment following the adoption of the recommended allocations by City Council, and that monthly instalments to these organizations resume in January 2017.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

1.  Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back to the Economic Development Committee in 2017 on the economic and cultural impacts of the 2013-2016 increases to the Major Cultural Organizations Grant allocations.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report recommends allocations for eleven not-for-profit organizations that have applied for funding through the Major Cultural Organizations (MCO) program administered by Economic Development and Culture. Recipient organizations deliver unique artistic programming that strengthens the richness and diversity of Toronto's cultural sector. These organizations have significant cultural, social, and economic impact: they attract visitors, drive cultural tourism, lead in arts education and community initiatives, and make Toronto an internationally recognized cultural destination.

 

The total program funds for these allocations is $8,069,960 as approved by City Council on February 17, 2016, as part of the 2016 Operating Budget. This is the first year for the implementation and changes to the eligibility and assessment criteria of the MCO program. Allocation recommendations presented in this report are based on the review by Economic Development and Culture Division's Arts and Culture Services staff and an external peer advisory panel. All recipients are subject to the City of Toronto's Grants Policy.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 22, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the 2016 Major Cultural Organizations Allocations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92789.pdf
Attachment 1: Summary of 2016 Major Cultural Organization Recipient Organizations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92790.pdf

ED12.6 - 2016 Local Arts Service Organizations (LASOs) Grant Allocation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the Economic Development and Culture Division's funding allocations totalling $1,705,400 to six Local Arts Service Organizations as follows:

 

  Organization

  Funding Allocation

Arts Etobicoke                                   

$438,795

Lakeshore Arts                                                  

$295,430

Scarborough Arts                        

$269,000

UrbanArts Community Arts Council              

$295,435

East End Arts

$171,000

North York Arts

$235,740

Total

$1,705,400

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

1.  Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back to the Economic Development Committee in 2017 on the economic and cultural impacts of the 2013-2016 Local Arts Service Organizations Grant allocations.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report seeks Council approval on the recommended funding allocations for the six non-profit organizations that have applied for municipal support through the Local Arts

Service Organizations (LASOs) grant program.

 

Allocation recommendations presented in this report are based on the review by Economic Development and Culture Division's Arts and Culture Services staff and an external peer advisory panel. Arts and Culture Services staff manage the program and reviewed the grant applications with due diligence and in compliance with the City of Toronto’s Community Grants Policy adopted by Council at its July 16, 2013 meeting,

 

A total of $1,705,400 is included in the Economic Development and Culture 2016 Approved Operating Budget to fund the six Local Service Arts Organizations.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the 2016 Local Arts Service Organizations (LASOs) Grant Allocation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92765.pdf
Appendix 1: Overview of Local Arts Service Organizations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92766.pdf

ED12.7 - 2016 Culture Build Allocations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the allocation of $330,000.00 to the following organizations through the Culture Build Investment Program:

 

Organization

Funding Allocation

Living City Foundation (Black Creek Pioneer Village)

$50,000.00

Canadian Music Centre

$40,000.00

Coleman Lemieux & Compagnie 

$13,000.00

Evergreen

$  4,000.00

Ontario Crafts Council (Craft Ontario)

$70,000.00

Prefix Institute of Contemporary Art

$  5,000.00

Propeller Centre for Visual Arts

$12,000.00

Revue Cinema

$14,000.00

Tangled Art + Disability

$37,000.00

Textile Museum of Canada

$50,000.00

Young Centre for the Performing Arts

$35,000.00

Total:                                                                               

$330,000.00

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

1.  Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to review and document the operational impacts and benefits of the reinstated Culture Build program and report back to the Economic Development Committee in 2017 on the 2013-2016 allocations.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the 2016 Culture Build Investment Program allocations for 11 non-municipally owned cultural facilities. The total program funds of $330,000.00 was approved by City Council as part of the Economic Development and Culture Division's 2016 operating budget.

 

The Culture Build Investment Program provides matching funds to assist the City's not-for-profit cultural sector with state of good repair capital projects. The arts and cultural organizations that are supported by the program provide a wide variety of opportunities for Toronto residents to engage in the arts as participants, volunteers or audience members.

 

The allocations recommended in this report are the result of a review of eligible applications by a peer advisory committee. All applications were received by the February 1, 2016 deadline and assessed by the committee according to established criteria. The program is administered in accordance with the City of Toronto Grants Policy as adopted by City Council.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the 2016 Culture Build Allocations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92787.pdf

ED12.8 - Junction Gardens Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Minor Boundary Expansion

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
11 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Bills 552 and 553 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council designate the area described by Attachment 1 to the report (April 20, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the expanded Junction Gardens Business Improvement Area under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code;

 

2.  City Council direct the City solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment 1 to the report (April 20, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture as the expanded Junction Gardens Business Improvement Area; and

 

3.  City Council grant the City Solicitor authority to amend Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, as necessary to reflect the expanded boundaries of Junction Gardens Business Improvement Area.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend a minor expansion of the Junction Gardens Business Improvement Area (BIA) boundary to include the Canadian Pacific Railway (CPR) Bridge located across Keele Street, north of Dundas Street.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 20, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Junction Gardens Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Minor Boundary Expansion
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92795.pdf

ED12.9 - Riverside District Business Improvement Area (BIA) Minor Boundary Expansion

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bills 565 and 566 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council designate the area described by Attachment 1 to the report (April 20, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the amended Riverside District Business Improvement Area under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code;

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment 1 to the report (April 20, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture as the expanded Riverside District Business Improvement Area; and

 

3.  City Council grant the City Solicitor authority to amend Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, as necessary to reflect the expanded boundaries of the Riverside District Business Improvement Area.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend a minor expansion of the Riverside District Business Improvement Area (BIA) boundaries to include the property at 635 Queen Street East, a mid-rise residential condominium building with commercial retail space at grade situated between two commercial properties within the boundaries of the BIA.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 20, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Riverside District Business Improvement Area (BIA) Minor Boundary Expansion
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92792.pdf

ED12.13 - Toronto Economic Bulletin

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Items EX15.13 and ED12.3 to be considered together.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (May 6, 2016) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture for information.

Origin

(May 6, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The attached Toronto Economic Bulletin summarizes the most recent data available for key economic indicators benchmarking the city's economic performance.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 6, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Toronto Economic Bulletin
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92806.pdf
(May 6, 2016) Attachment: Toronto Economic Bulletin
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-92970.pdf

ED12.14 - Review of the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation, Technology (IMIT) Financial Incentive Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning, and the City Solicitor, to initiate a review of the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology (IMIT) Financial Incentive Program in 2016, based on the Terms of Reference as set out in Appendix A to the report (May 9, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, the Deputy City Manager Cluster B and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

2.  City Council direct staff to report back to the Economic Development Committee on the results of the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology (IMIT) Program Review and any recommended changes for the program in the fourth quarter of 2016.

 

3.  City Council direct staff to report to Budget Committee annually on the current and expected future costs of the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology (IMIT) Program.

Origin

(May 9, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology (IMIT) Financial Incentive

Program provides incentives to support the renovation or construction of buildings in targeted employment sectors and uses throughout the City. This report provides an overview of the economic and financial impacts of the IMIT Program and proposes the Terms of Reference for the upcoming review of the Program.

 

Since the Program commenced in 2008, twenty-eight (28) IMIT agreements have been entered into for development projects in a wide range of sectors, representing almost $2 billion in total construction investment, 9.6 million square feet of commercial/industrial space and the creation or retention of 30,000 jobs.

 

In total, these new developments are expected to result in about $485 million in new municipal taxes during the period in which they receive grants. Of those, about $291 million will be returned to the property owners and tenants in the form of development grants, while about $194 million will be retained by the City. After the grant back period, the City will realize approximately $49 million in new taxes annually.

The Community Improvement Plans (CIP's) approved by Council in 2012, require a review no later than four years after the Program came into full force and effect (November 9, 2012). Due to the mandate of this Program to support new economic activity and to the amounts of grant money being expended, it is critical to review the parameters to ensure that it meets its objectives as effectively and efficiently as possible.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 9, 2016) Report and Appendices A and B from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on the Review of the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation, Technology (IMIT) Financial Incentive Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-93009.pdf
(April 28, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Review of the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation, Technology (IMIT) Financial Incentive Program - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-93008.pdf

Government Management Committee - Meeting 12

GM12.1 - Provision of Proprietary Software Licenses from SAP Canada for the SAP HANA (High Performance Analytic Appliance) Solution of the City's Enterprise Performance Management Project

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Chief Information Officer and the Executive Director, Financial Planning to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive agreement with SAP Canada to procure SAP proprietary software licenses for the SAP HANA (High Performance Analytic Applicance) solution for the Enterprise Performance Management phase of the Financial Planning, Analysis and Reporting System (FPARS) project, in the amount of $1,549,000 net of HST, ($1,576,262, net of HST recoveries), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Information Officer and the Executive Director, Financial Planning and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority to enter into non-competitive contract with SAP Canada to procure SAP proprietary software licenses for the SAP HANA solution of the City's Enterprise Performance Management Project, in the amount of $1,549,000 net of HST, and $1,576,262 net of HST recoveries.

 

HANA (High Performance Analytic Appliance) is the database and application foundation for all future SAP products and development. It runs business processes faster and delivers smarter analytics applications. This platform enables development of intelligent and next-generation applications that are not possible on a traditional relational database management system (RDBMS) such as Oracle. It empowers business operations to be 10 to 1000 times faster than a standard database such as Oracle on the same hardware. HANA is SAP's strategic database and application platform for all future SAP products.

 

The HANA platform is required for the second phase of the Financial Planning Analysis Reporting System (FPARS) project: Enterprise Performance Management (EPM). The EPM phase's planned deliverables and requirements forms part of the approved FPARS Capital project budget of $60.8 million.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71 Financial Control, Section 71-11A, where the total amount of $1,549,000 net of HST, ($1,576,262 net of HST recoveries) exceeds staff authority.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on Provision of Proprietary Software Licenses from SAP Canada for the SAP HANA (High Performance Analytic Appliance) Solution of City's Enterprise Performance Management Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92557.pdf
Pamphlet from the Chief Information Officer titled "Enabling The eCity Modernization Strategy, A Collaborative Point-of-View, January 2016"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92965.pdf

GM12.2 - Provision of SAP Ariba - Proprietary Software as a Service from SAP Canada for Supply Chain Management Transformation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Chief Information Officer and the Treasurer to negotiate and execute a five year contract with SAP Canada for the use of SAP Ariba in the amount of $11,220,210 net of HST ($11,417,686 net of HST recoveries), including a credit of $2,497,930 over five years for a total cost of $8,919,756 net of HST recoveries, based on terms and conditions set out in Appendix A to the report (April 25, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and on other terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Information Officer and the Treasurer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority for the Chief Information Officer and the Treasurer to negotiate and enter into an agreement with SAP Canada for use of SAP Canada's SAP Ariba Software as a Service solution for the City's Supply Chain Management Transformation Project. 

 

SAP Ariba is an end-to-end integrated solution for purchasing, materials management and account payable functions.  Through the following modules, SAP Ariba will provide the following functionality: 

 

-  SAP Ariba Sourcing- This module of Ariba will integrate with the materials management and purchasing modules of SAP. This will allow the City to create and post RFx documents, receive RFx responses, evaluate and score the responses and communicate with suppliers all within an online environment.

 

-  SAP Ariba Contract Management- This module will enable the ability to convert the winning bid/proposal directly into contracts, the ability to track and monitor contract usage, the ability for vendors to directly interface with accounts payable to allow payment of all invoices electronically and provide reporting capabilities.

 

-  SAP Ariba Online Catalog- This feature will integrate with the warehouse management module of SAP. It will allow City staff to request items from the city managed warehouses via an online portal that will have the items as part of an online catalog. It will also enable the ability to punch-out to vendor catalogs, to allow direct ordering from vendors that have contracts with the City.

 

-  SAP Ariba Spend Analysis- The spend analysis module of Ariba will allow the City to conduct a categorised spend analysis. The reporting is available in the form of dashboards and will allow the City to leverage spend data as part of strategic sourcing initiatives and to rationalize the supply base.

 

-  SAP Ariba Vendor Performance Management- This Ariba module will require suppliers to register themselves as prospective vendors for the City. The City would be able to manage supplier profiles and report on their performance based on various criteria as established by the City.

 

Implementing SAP Ariba will modernize the City's procurement process and PMMD, leading to efficiency in PMMD's processes by introducing automation and elimination of manual tasks such as receiving physical bids, handling bids and entering data into various databases, increasing the number of compliant bids, improving the ability to analyze data in the procurement process, improving the capture of early payment discounts, and laying the technological ground work to help move to shared services with the City Agencies.

 

Preliminary benefits from implementing the Supply Chain Management Transformation Project are as follows:

 

Benefit

Amount

Cost Savings - Industry analysis suggests allowing for electronic bid and proposal submissions increases the number of compliant bids and allows better management of spend leading to potential savings of 2% to 6% per $1 billion in spend. The City's average over last 5 years is approximately $1.8 billion.

Approximately $36 million – based on a conservative estimate of 2% of $1.8 billion.

Cost Savings - Increased ability to capture early discounts on invoice payments, estimated to increase by 15 to 25%.

Approximately $200,000 to $300,000

Service Efficiencies - Increased efficiencies for PMMD staff by reducing administrative and manual effort and replacing with more value added activity, allowing staff to focus on more value-added activities in the procurement process. This is not a reduction in staff.

Approximately 126 hours per Buyer FTE or equivalent to 2.6 Buyers FTEs or approximately $230,000, based on 37 buyers.

Cost Recovery - An annual credit from SAP with respect to past maintenance costs

Approximately $499,586 per year for the next five years ($2,497,930)

 

The cost savings suggested by the industry are expected, however the ability to track this type of savings will be extremely difficult to determine. It is also anticipated that there will be further process efficiencies in PMMD and in City Divisions and other cost savings that are not captured in the above but will materialize as the Project is implemented. As part of the Project, staff will continue to review and validate the benefits as identified, where possible.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2016) Report and Appendix A from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on Provision of SAP Ariba - Proprietary Software as a Service from SAP Canada for Supply Chain Management Transformation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92559.pdf
Pamphlet from the Chief Information Officer titled "Enabling The eCity Modernization Strategy, A Collaborative Point-of-View, January 2016"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92929.pdf

GM12.5 - Non-Competitive Contract for Proprietary Geographic Information System Software Licenses from ESRI Canada Limited

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant authority to the Chief Information Officer, to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive contract with ESRI Canada Limited to purchase proprietary geographic information system software licenses, for a one (1) year period commencing from the date that the contract is issued, with the option to renew for additional four (4) separate one (1) year periods, at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approval(s), for the total amount of $800,000 net of HST ($814,080 net of HST recoveries) on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Information Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority to approve and enter into a non-competitive contract with ESRI Canada Limited (ESRI) to purchase proprietary geographic information system (GIS) software licenses for a one (1) period commencing from the date that the contract is issued, with the option to renew for additional four (4) separate one (1) year periods, at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approval(s), for the total amount of $800,000 net of HST and $814,080 net of HST recoveries.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code By-law Chapter 195-Purchasing, where the current request has exceeded the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five (5) year commitment limit under Section 1 of the Purchasing By-Law and also exceeds the threshold of $500,000, net of HST, allowed under staff authority as per the Municipal Code By-Law, Chapter 71 – Financial Control.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on Non-Competitive Contract for Proprietary Geographic Information System Software Licenses from ESRI Canada Limited
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92548.pdf

GM12.6 - Non-Competitive Proprietary Professional Services and Software from Verint Americas Inc. for Upgrades to the Lagan Enterprise Case Management and the Integrated Knowledge Base Component

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer and Chief Information Officer to enter into a non-competitive contract with Verint Americas Inc. to provide proprietary professional services and software to implement the upgrade of Lagan Enterprise Case Management and the integrated Knowledge Base in the amount of $754,856 net of HST ($768,141 net of HST recoveries) on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Information Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Corporate Officer, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to negotiate and execute a non-competitive agreement with Verint Americas Inc. (Verint), to provide proprietary professional services and software to upgrade Lagan Enterprise Case Management (ECM) and the integrated Knowledge Base used by 311 Toronto.  The estimated value is not to exceed $754,856 net of HST ($768,141 net of HST recoveries).

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71 Financial Control, Section 71-11A, where the total amount of $754,856 net of HST ($768,141net of HST recoveries) exceeds staff authority of $500,000.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Chief Information Officer, the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Non-Competitive Proprietary Professional Services and Software from Verint Americas Inc. for Upgrades to the Lagan Enterprise Case Management and the Integrated Knowledge Base Component
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92556.pdf

GM12.7 - Expropriation of the Property known as 1230 - 1234 Weston Road for a New Early Learning and Child Care Facility

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant authority to the Director, Real Estate Services to initiate expropriation proceedings, if necessary, where negotiations are unsuccessful, for the acquisition of the fee simple interest at 1230-1234 Weston Road depicted in Appendix A (the "Lands") to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Chief Corporate Officer for construction of a new child care centre on the Lands.

 
2.  City Council grant authority to the Director, Real Estate Services to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Lands, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearing that are received, to attend the hearing to present the City's position, and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to Council for its consideration.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report seeks authority to commence expropriation proceedings for the property municipally known as 1230-1234 Weston Road, being a site required for a new child care centre needed in the area to replace the existing Hollis Early Learning and Child Care Centre (ELCCC) directly operated by the City and located at 1 Hollis Street ("1 Hollis Street"). 1 Hollis Street is to be purchased by Metrolinx based on their need to expand the Eglington Crosstown LRT.  The fee simple acquisition of 1230-1234 Weston Road is required for the construction and development of new replacement child care centre in Ward 11 – South Weston, as demand for child care continues to exist in the community.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 22, 2016) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer on Expropriation of the Property known as 1230 - 1234 Weston Road for a New Early Learning and Child Care Facility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92361.pdf

GM12.8 - Lease Agreement with St. Lawrence Co-operative Day Care

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize a new lease agreement (the "Lease Agreement") with St. Lawrence Co-operative Day Care Inc. ("St. Lawrence Day Care") for a term of five (5) years with an option to renew for a further five (5) years for nominal consideration, substantially based on the terms set out in Appendix A to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services, and on such other or amended terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor, and that this grant be deemed to be in the interest of the City.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, to administer and manage the Lease Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to enter into a new lease agreement with St. Lawrence Co-operative Day Care Inc. for approximately 5,763 square feet of space in the St. Lawrence Community Centre building located at 230 The Esplanade for nominal consideration.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 22, 2016) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Children's Services on Lease Agreement with St. Lawrence Co-operative Day Care
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92387.pdf

GM12.9 - Victoria University Act - Assessment Appeal of 131 Bloor Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation or potential litigation that affects the City.

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 25, 2016) from the City Solicitor and the Treasurer.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of all or a portion of the confidential instructions in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 25, 2016) from the City Solicitor and the Treasurer, once adopted by City Council at the discretion of the City Solicitor and direct that the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and pertains to litigation or potential litigation.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Treasurer, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to request that the provincial government amend the Victoria University Act to make the tax exemption sections in that Act consistent with the tax exemption sections in the Assessment Act and the enabling legislation for other public universities in Toronto and Ontario.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor and the Treasurer

Summary

This report advises City Council on legislation that applies to 131 and 151 Bloor Street West and other properties owned by Victoria University that exempts portions of these properties from taxation even when they are not used and occupied by the university. This report recommends that City Council request that the province amend the Victoria University Act to bring its tax exemption provisions in line with the Assessment Act and other university acts. This report also highlights the impact the tax exemption provisions for Victoria University have on the assessments of 131 Bloor Street West and advises Council on assessment appeals of that property. The Confidential Attachment outlines a settlement proposal for the assessment appeals of 131 Bloor Street West.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor and the Treasurer on Victoria University Act - Assessment Appeal of 131 Bloor Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92560.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Confidential Attachment 1 - Victoria University Act - Assessment Appeal of 131 Bloor Street West

GM12.10 - City Services Benefit Card: An Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendation in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 25, 2016) from the General Manager, Employment and Social Services, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management and the Treasurer.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of all or part of the confidential recommendation and information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (April 25, 2016) from the General Manager, Employment and Social Services, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management and the Treasurer, if adopted, at the discretion of the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Treasurer and the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Treasurer

Summary

The City Services Benefit Card (CSBC), introduced in July 2012, is a reloadable electronic funds transfer card that has improved services and reduced costs for low income residents and generated savings for the City. This report, including the confidential attachment, responds to a recommendation to report back with an update on the CSBC in the context of important changes, including the Province's intention to implement their own benefit card solution.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Treasurer on City Services Benefit Card: An Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92519.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Confidential Attachment 1 with Appendices A and B - City Services Benefit Card: An Update

GM12.11 - 315 Front Street West, Suite 300 - Designation of a Portion of Premises as a Municipal Capital Facility

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 550 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council pass a by-law pursuant to section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:

 

a.  enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with Oxford Properties Group Inc., the current owner of 315-325 Front Street West, in respect of approximately 32,745 square feet leased by staff of the Chief Corporate Officer Organization through the Office Modernization Program - Pilot Projects; and

 

b.  exempt the leased space of approximately 32,745 square feet from taxation for municipal and education purposes, for which the tax exemption is to be effective from the latest of the following dates: the commencement date of the lease; the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed; or the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the by-law to the Minister of Education, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Conseil Scolaire de District du Centre-Sud-Ouest, and the Conseil Scolaire de District du Catholique Centre-Sud.

Origin

(April 21, 2016) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report seeks Council's authority for the adoption of necessary by-laws to designate as a municipal capital facility the premises occupied by staff of the Chief Corporate Officer Organization through the Office Modernization Program – Pilot Projects located at 315 Front Street West, Suite 300, and to provide a property tax exemption for municipal and education purposes.  The municipal capital facility agreement will provide an exemption for approximately 32,745 square feet of space that is being leased for the period of March 1, 2016 to October 31, 2016, however, the tax implications stated below are for the period of July 12, 2016 to October 31, 2016, reflecting the date City Council may pass the by-law allowing the exemption.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 21, 2016) Report from the Treasurer on 315 Front Street West, Suite 300 - Designation of a Portion of Premises as a Municipal Capital Facility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92420.pdf

GM12.17 - Extension of Outdoor Advertising Contract between the City of Toronto and Clear Channel Outdoor for Additional One (1) Year Period

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management to execute an amending agreement on behalf of the City of Toronto to extend the existing agreement between the City of Toronto and Clear Channel Outdoor for an additional one-year period, concluding on June 30, 2017, such amendment to allow Clear Channel Outdoor to replace the two existing LED advertising signage units with two new units of similar dimensions, and increasing the funding commitment from Clear Channel Outdoor from 40 percent to 45 percent of net advertising revenue and subject to such other terms and conditions recommended by the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and City Solicitor.

Origin

(April 27, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to transmit a report from the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management (the "Board") recommending that City Council authorize the Board to execute an amending agreement to the existing outdoor advertising agreement between the City of Toronto ("City") and Clear Channel Outdoor (CCO) (the "Agreement").  The amending agreement will extend the term of the Agreement for an additional one (1) year period allowing the City to continue to receive revenue under the existing Agreement until the Board completes a procurement process for a new multi-year opportunity for new signage.

 

In exchange for this extension, CCO has agreed to make improvements to the existing signage and increase its guaranteed minimum contribution from 40 percent to 45 percent of net advertising revenue.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 27, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Extension of Outdoor Advertising Contract between the Yonge Dundas Square Board of Management and Clear Channel Outdoor for Additional One (1) Year Period
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92544.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Attachment 1 - Yonge Dundas Square Board of Management Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92613.pdf

GM12.18 - Purchase of Stratified Interest in 300 to 308 Queen Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the acquisition by the City from the Vendor of a below-grade strata portion of the Property together with the Vendor’s interest in the below-grade portion of Soho Street, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the purchase and sale agreement which are substantially set out in Appendix A to the report (April 25, 2016) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City to enter into the ancillary transactions contemplated under the purchase and sale agreement which require the City to be party, solely in its capacity as land owner, including the easements and reciprocal cost sharing agreements, restrictive covenant agreements, redevelopment buy-back options, closing and other agreements to implement the purchase and sale agreement, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix A to the report (April 25, 2016) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority, together with such other terms and conditions as the Chief Corporate Officer, in consultation with the Toronto Parking Authority may deem appropriate, and in form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council direct that prior to closing the transactions described in Recommendations 1 and 2, the City Solicitor shall be in receipt of appropriate title opinions, from the solicitor for the Toronto Parking Authority, in form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.  City Council direct that the lands acquired under the purchase and sale agreement to be used for the municipal underground parking garage be designated for municipal parking purposes and managed by the Toronto Parking Authority.

 

5.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions contemplated under the purchase and sale agreement, deliver any notices, pay any expenses and amend the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s) on such terms and conditions as the City Solicitor may determine from time to time.

 

6.  City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to execute all documents and take the necessary actions to give effect to Council's decision.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Report from the President, Toronto Parking Authority

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain Council's authorization to complete a purchase and sale agreement ("PSA") involving a transaction between the Toronto Parking Authority (the "TPA") and 2206181 Ontario Inc., Queen Street Retail Inc., 2230017 Ontario Inc., and Sweeny Holdings Inc. (collectively referred to as the "Vendor").  The Vendor is the property owner of the lands municipally known as 300 to 308 Queen Street West (the "Property").  The transaction involves the acquisition by the City of a stratified interest in a below-grade strata of the Property within which a municipal parking facility is to be located and form part of a mixed commercial / retail development.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2016) Report and Appendices A to D from the President, Toronto Parking Authority on Purchase of Stratified Interest in 300 to 308 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-92570.pdf

Licensing and Standards Committee - Meeting 11

LS11.3 - Multi-Residential Apartment Buildings (MRAB) Audit and Enforcement Program - 2015 Annual Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication LS11.3.5 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council delegate to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards the authority to waive witness fees for Landlord and Tenant Board proceedings when Municipal Standards Officers are summoned to attend by a tenant.

 

2.  City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to:

 

a.  Develop policies, procedures and service standards for initiating remedial action and prosecutions for non-compliant landlords; and

 

b.  Develop a system that identifies, classifies, and weights property standard violations to facilitate the future development of a building quality rating system for multi-residential buildings.


3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to apply the normal enforcement process for violations of a municipal by-law, including the timely escalation of enforcement to include Notice of Violation or Orders to Comply if compliance is not achieved, for alleged contraventions of Chapter 629-19 (stairway railing safety) discovered as part of Multi-Residential Apartment Building (MRAB) audits.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Director of Investigation Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards made a presentation to the Committee.

Origin

(May 3, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

This report provides the annual update on the Multi-Residential Apartment Buildings (MRAB) Audit and Enforcement Program. The goal of the program is to ensure that minimum property and maintenance standards within multi-residential rental properties are maintained in accordance with the City's property standards by-laws and other applicable regulations. The goal contributes to ML&S's overarching vision that every person deserves a safe, secure and decent place to live. Since 2008, the program has audited 1,046 rental apartment buildings in Toronto.

 

This report describes operational enhancements undertaken in 2015 to improve efficiency and increase the impact of the MRAB program on the quality of rental housing in Toronto. The enhancements focussed on resolution and escalated enforcement, increased landlord engagement, new collaborations with stakeholders and a city-wide tenant education campaign. In response to requests from tenant organizations, this report proposes that City Council delegate to the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards the authority to waive witness fees for Landlord and Tenant Board proceedings when Municipal Standards Officers are summoned to attend by a tenant.

 

This report also provides 2015 year-end data related to program activities. In 2015, MRAB staff conducted 193 pre-audit assessments and 84 audits of multi-residential apartment buildings. Staff also conducted 1,917 re-inspections, closing 575 orders and rectifying 6,607 deficiencies. In response to wilfully non-compliant building owners, staff conducted six remedial actions that resulted in $111, 331.94 being added to the owners' property taxes. As a result of these activities, the rate of compliance with orders in private and TCH-owned buildings has increased from 82% to 89% since the last annual report.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 3, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, on Multi-Residential Apartment Buildings (MRAB) Audit and Enforcement Program - 2015 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-92837.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map of MRAB Audit Locations, 2008-2015 and Map of MRAB Pre-audit Assessment Locations, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-92885.pdf
Attachment 2 - Annual Statistics and Analysis for MRAB Activities, 2008-2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-92886.pdf
Attachment 3 - MRAB Case Studies, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-92887.pdf
Attachment 4 - Risk-based Assessment Tool for Audit Selection
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-92879.pdf
Presentation from the Director of Investigation Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards on MRAB - 2015 Annual Report - Improving the quality of rental housing in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-93208.pdf

Speakers

Kenn Hale, Director, Legal Services, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (ACTO)
Daryl Chong, President and CEO, Greater Toronto Apartment Association
Randall and Christine Chaiet
Harold Myshrall
Helen Chilas, President and Chair, 1501 Woodbine Tenants Association

Communications (Committee)

(January 14, 2016) Letter from Geoff MacBride, President, Toronto Paramedic Association (LS.New.LS11.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-60794.pdf
(May 18, 2016) Letter from Frank Ramagnano, President, Toronto Professional Firefighter's Association, submitted by Damien Walsh (LS.New.LS11.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-60840.pdf
(May 19, 2016) Letter from Kenn Hale, Director, Legal Services, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (ACTO) (LS.New.LS11.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-60861.pdf
(May 19, 2016) Submission from Jonathan Krehm, Principal, O'Shanter Development Company Ltd. (LS.New.LS11.3.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-60904.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 7, 2016) Letter from Daryl Chong, President and Chief Executive Officer, Greater Toronto Apartment Association (CC.New.LS11.3.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61181.pdf

3a - Multi-Residential Apartment Buildings (MRAB) Audit and Enforcement Program - 2015 Annual Report

Origin
(May 17, 2016) Letter from the Tenant Issues Committee
Summary

The Tenant Issues Committee, on May 17, 2016, considered Item TD3.2 regarding the Multi-Residential Apartment Buildings (MRAB) Audit and Enforcement Program - 2015 Annual Report.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 17, 2016) Letter from the Tenant Issues Committee on Multi-Residential Apartment Buildings (MRAB) Audit and Enforcement Program - 2015 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-93144.pdf

LS11.4 - Proposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications LS11.4.3 and LS11.4.4 have been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to conduct public consultation on the proposed framework for a multi-residential rental property licence, such consultation to seek input on a variety of staffing and service levels; and report back in the fall of 2016 on:

 

                  a.  the consultation findings,

                  b.  a draft by-law,

                  c.  associated fee,

                  d.  budget and staffing model,

                  e.  proposed administrative monetary penalties,

                  f.  final proposed licensing fees,

                  g.  public education, communication and tenant engagement plan,

                  h.  technology requirements,

                  i.  implementation schedule, and

                  j.  fee reductions for demonstrated compliance with property standards by-laws.

Origin

(May 3, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

This report outlines a proposed framework for licensing multi-residential rental properties as a regulatory tool for contributing to safe and adequate rental housing in Toronto. The framework was drafted in response to direction from Licensing and Standards Committee. The report summarizes the results of a jurisdictional scan, as well as preliminary stakeholder consultations with tenant organizations, landlord groups, Toronto Community Housing and staff from relevant City divisions.

 

The licensing framework proposed in this report will be the subject of further public consultations to assess its impact on tenants, landlords and other stakeholders. The framework incorporates existing enforcement activities related to multi-residential properties such as building audits as well as in-suite inspections. It also creates additional requirements to improve the sustainability of minimum property standards in rental properties such as annual inspections and maintenance plans. The estimated costs of administering and enforcing the proposed licence are outlined in this report, including an estimated licensing fee of $12 to $15 per unit based on cost recovery. However, further analysis is required.

 

This report also responds to other opportunities and challenges raised during the stakeholder consultations and Committee meetings related to the licensing framework and strengthening the City's response to non-compliant landlords.

 

Legal Services and Shelter, Support and Housing Administration were consulted in the preparation of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 3, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, on Proposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-92900.pdf
Attachment 1 - Jurisdictional Scan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-92891.pdf

Speakers

Yale Fox
Kenn Hale, Director of Legal Services, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Services (ACTO)
Geordie Dent, Executive Director and John Plumadore, Chair, Federation of Metro Tenants Association (FMTA)
Daryl Chong, President and CEO, Greater Toronto Apartment Association
Ted Whitehead, Director of Certification, Federation of Rental-Housing Providers of Ontario (FRPO)
Jonathan Krehm, Principal, O’Shanter Development Company Ltd
Peter Duff, Director, Technical Services, Centurion Property Associates
Gloria Salomon, CEO, Preston Group
Laura Holland, Chief Operating Officer, Timbercreek Communities
Steve Weinrieb, Director of Special Projects, Park Property Management
Justin Taylor, Chief Operating Officer, GREENROCK Real Estate Advisors
Trish MacPherson, Executive Vice President, Operations, CAPREIT
Scott Andison, President and CEO, Federation of Rental-Housing Providers of Ontario (FRPO)
Natalie Hundt, Toronto ACORN
Harold Myshrall
Helen Chilas, President and Chair, 1501 Woodbine Tenants Association

Communications (Committee)

(May 19, 2016) Letter from Kenn Hale, Director, Legal Services, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (ACTO) (LS.New.LS11.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-60862.pdf
(May 19, 2016) Submission from Ted Whitehead (on file in the City Clerk's Office) (LS.New.LS11.4.2)

Communications (City Council)

(June 7, 2016) Letter from Daryl Chong, President and Chief Executive Officer, Greater Toronto Apartment Association (CC.New.LS11.4.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61162.pdf
(June 5, 2016) E-mail from Kate MacKinnon (CC.New.LS11.4.4)

4a - Proposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence

Origin
(May 17, 2016) Letter from the Tenant Issues Committee
Summary

The Tenant Issues Committee, on May 17, 2016, considered Item TD3.3 regarding the Proposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 17, 2016) Letter from the Tenant Issues Committee on Proposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-93145.pdf

LS11.5 - Graffiti Management Plan - StreetARToronto (StART) Partnership Programs 2016 Grant Allocation Recommendations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the list of grant applications for the 2016 StART Partnership program as outlined in Appendix A, attached to the report (May 2, 2016) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Origin

(May 2, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

StreetARToronto (StART) is a partnership program launched in 2012 as a central feature of the City's Graffiti Management Plan.  It is a proactive approach to both eliminating graffiti vandalism and supporting street art that adds character and visual interest to city streets.  Initiated as part of the Community Partnership and Investment Program (CPIP), StART is administered by the Transportation Services, Public Realm Section, which is also responsible for coordinating and implementing all non-enforcement related components of the Graffiti Management Plan.

 

StART engages and links residents, community groups, artists and arts organizations with each other as well as with City staff and Councillors.  To expand the geographical reach of street art projects across the city, Public Realm staff conducted a broad outreach program including Information Session in all four districts. At the Information Sessions, and in response to enquiries, StART staff encouraged potential applicants to develop projects for locations in wards where StART Partnership Program murals have not yet been installed.  These priorities were also shown on the City's website.

 

This report recommends funding for 17 mural projects to be delivered by community-based organizations under the 2016 StART Partnership Program including installations in two wards which currently do not have a StART Partnership mural. Staff met with all Councillors representing wards without a mural and we are confident that the target for mural installations in all 44 wards will be met by 2017 either by the StART Partnership program or other StART initiatives.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 2, 2016) Report and Appendices A-C from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Graffiti Management Plan - StreetARToronto (StART) Partnership Programs 2016 Grant Allocation Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-92759.pdf

Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 11

PE11.1 - Donation from Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area for College Park Skating Trail and Rink House

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to accept a cash donation of $250,000.00 from the Board of Management for the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area towards the costs of a new outdoor artificial ice rink (skating trail) and rink house as part of the existing College Park rejuvenation capital project.

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into a donor agreement with the Board of Management for the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area for the $250,000.00 donation towards the costs of a new outdoor artificial ice rink (skating trail) and rink house as part of the existing College Park rejuvenation capital project, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek approval from Toronto City Council to accept a cash donation from the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area towards the new outdoor artificial ice rink (skating trail) and rink house as part of the College Park rejuvenation capital project in compliance with the Policy on Donations to the City for Community Benefit.

 

College Park is being rebuilt from scratch, and a new skating trail and rink house are planned components of the new park.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Donation from Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area for College Park Skating Trail and Rink House
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-92666.pdf

Speakers

Mark Garner, Executive Director and Chief Staff Officer, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area

Communications (Committee)

(May 12, 2016) Submission from Mark Garner, Executive Director and Chief Staff Officer, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (PE.New.PE11.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pe/comm/communicationfile-60643.pdf

Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 12

PG12.7 - Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PG12.7.3 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the revised Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Addendum, Attachment 1 to the report (April 20, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for City staff to use together with the 2010 approved Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards in the preparation of area studies or during the evaluation of development applications where mid-rise buildings are proposed and the Performance Standards are applicable, until such time as Council considers and adopts updated Mid-Rise Building Design Guidelines in the fourth quarter of 2017.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1. Requested City Planning staff to consult further on the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards as part of the Five Year Review of the Official Plan and that staff propose policies with respect to mid-rise buildings, including among other matters, criteria for determining appropriate building heights, to be incorporated into the Official Plan.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report is supplementary to the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring report (March 11, 2016). The purpose of this report is to address Planning and Growth Management Committee's deferral decision at the April 6, 2016 meeting. (http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.PG11.3). As per the Committee's request, this supplementary report includes a discussion on the Structure Map from the Official Plan, which identifies where growth will occur. The report also includes a revised Attachment 1: Mid-Rise Buildings Performance Standards Addendum (April 20, 2016) for City Council's consideration and approval.

 

The revised Addendum (April 20, 2016), incorporates comments received from members of Council and the Swansea Area Ratepayers Group during and subsequent to the April 6, 2016 Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting. New revisions to the Addendum are indicated by bold and underlined text. The identified changes are generally minor in nature and seek to further clarify the recommended actions contained within the Addendum.

 

City Council's approval of the revised Addendum (April 20, 2016) is recommended as an interim approach to ensure that the feedback and recommendations from the monitoring period, stakeholder consultations and recent Committee and Council meetings are considered together with the 2010 approved Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards in the preparation of area studies or during the evaluation of development applications where mid-rise buildings are proposed and the Performance Standards are applicable, until such time as Council considers and adopts updated Mid-Rise Building Design Guidelines in late 2017.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92536.pdf
Attachment 1: Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Addendum (April 20, 2016)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92537.pdf

Speakers

Veronica Wynne, Vice-President, Swansea Area Ratepayers Group
Councillor Sarah Doucette

Communications (Committee)

(May 10, 2016) E-mail from Veronica Wynne, Vice-President, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Group and Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association (PG.New.PG12.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60526.pdf
(May 11, 2016) Letter from Eileen Denny, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (PG.New.PG12.7.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60601.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 7, 2016) Letter from Eileen Denny, Chair, Confederation of Residents and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG12.7.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61154.pdf

7a - Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring

Origin
(March 11, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
Summary

This report is supplementary to the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring report (August 28, 2015) and Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring – Supplementary Report (October 27, 2015). The purpose of this report is to provide a consolidated recommendation and revised Attachment 1: Mid-Rise Buildings Performance Standards Addendum ("the Addendum") for City Council's consideration and approval.

 

The Addendum incorporates Councillor input from the February 24, 2016 Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting item PG10.9 Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards – Presentation and Consultation, as well as the deputations and previous motions of Committee and Council as summarized in the minutes for PG9.8 Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2016.PG9.8.

 

City Council's approval of the Addendum is recommended as an interim approach to ensure that the feedback and recommendations from the monitoring period, stakeholder consultations and recent Committee and Council meetings are considered together with the 2010 approved Mid-Rise Buildings Performance Standards when City staff review mid-rise development applications or prepare area studies and policies involving mid-rise buildings, as well as during the development of draft urban design policies for public consultation as part of the Five Year Official Plan Review.

 

Updated Mid-Rise Building Design Guidelines will be prepared for consideration by Planning and Growth Management Committee in late 2017. The updated Guidelines will consolidate the 2010 approved Performance Standards and the Addendum, and will include stakeholder consultation, as well as relevant outcomes of the Five Year Official Plan Review and Ontario Municipal Board appeals of Zoning By-law 569-2013.

Background Information (Committee)
(March 11, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92708.pdf
Attachment 1: Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Addendum
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92709.pdf
Attachment 2: Data Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92710.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92711.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92702.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92704.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92703.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92705.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92706.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92707.pdf
Attachment 4: New Table of Contents
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92712.pdf
Attachment 5: Summary of Survey
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92713.pdf
Attachment 6: Chief Planner Roundtable Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92714.pdf
Attachment 7: Full List of Issues from Deputants (October 8, 2015 PGM)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92715.pdf
Attachment 8: Summary of Comments and Questions (February 24, 2016 PGM)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92716.pdf

7b - Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring

Origin
(November 4, 2015) Letter from City Council
Summary

City Council on November 3 and 4, 2015, referred Item PG7.1 back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee, for further consideration, together with the following motions:

 

Moved by Councillor Josh Matlow 

 

1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consult with and inform Residents' Associations and other interested community members on issues related to the implementation of the Midrise Buildings Performance Standards in the first quarter of 2016. 

 

2. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consult with Residents' Associations and other interested community members on future locations for Secondary Plans, Area Plans and other comprehensive Planning frameworks. 

 

3.  City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the feasibility of including the initiatives in Recommendations 1 and 2 above in the City Planning 2016 work plan. 

 

Moved by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio 

 

City Council amend Planning and Growth Management Committee Recommendation 1 by adding two new parts so that Recommendation 1 would now read: 

 

1.  City Council direct that Performance Standard #1 of the Mid-Rise Buildings Performance Standards be amended by: 

 

a.  including a 0.8:1 ratio (or 16 metre height limit) in Character Areas as defined in the Avenues and Character Area Map, as revised, which have 20m right-of-ways, as shown on Map (3) of the Official Plan; 

 

b.  including a 0.8:1 ratio (or 21.6 metre height limit) in Bloor West Village, defined as the stretch of Bloor Street between Jane Street and Clendenan Avenue; 

 

c.   including a provision that the maximum density on major streets not designated as Avenues or mixed use areas not exceed eighty percent of the density available on the same lands if the lands were located on an Avenue; 

 

d.  including a provision that the measurement of the 45 degree angular plane on the front of a building in a Commercial Residential zone or Apartment Residential zone with commercial at grade begin at a height that is equal to sixty percent of the street right-of-way on which the lot has frontage. 

 

Moved by Councillor Sarah Doucette

 

a. City Council amend Planning and Growth Management Committee Recommendation 1 by adding the words "excluding areas that have a local planning study that speaks to different heights, or existing zoning permission that exceeds 16m;" so that the recommendation now reads as follows: 

 

1.  City Council direct that Performance Standard #1 of the Mid-Rise Buildings Performance Standards be amended by: 

 

a.  including a 0.8:1 ratio (or 16 metre height limit) in Character Areas as defined in the Avenues and Character Area Map, as revised, which have 20m right-of-ways, as shown on Map (3) of the Official Plan, excluding areas that have a local planning study that speaks to different heights, or existing zoning permission that exceeds 16m; and 

and 

 

b.  City Council adopt the following recommendations contained in the supplementary report (October 27, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning [PG7.1a], with recommendation 2 amended to include the words "and City Council direct City staff to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the issues raised by the deputants as part of the larger Official Plan Review, anticipated in the third or fourth Quarter of 2016" so that the recommendations now read as follows: 

 

1.  Council direct City staff to reinforce the intent of Zoning By-Law 569-2013 provisions by stating in the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards that habitable space is discouraged above the maximum allowable building height. 

 

2.  Council direct City staff to include the list of issues raised by deputants at the October 8, 2015 Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting, as summarized in Attachment 1, to the report's 'Recommended Actions' section of Attachment 1 as part of a future work plan that further evaluates the success of the Mid-Rise Performance Standards, and City Council direct City staff to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the issues raised by the deputants as part of the larger Official Plan Review, anticipated in the third or fourth Quarter of 2016.

 

 

————

 

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council direct that Performance Standard #1 of the Mid-Rise Buildings Performance Standards be amended by:

 

a.  including a 0.8:1 ratio (or 16 metre height limit) in Character Areas as defined in the Avenues and Character Area Map, as revised, which have 20m right-of-ways, as shown on Map (3) of the Official Plan; and 

 

b.  including a 0.8:1 ratio (or 21.6 metre height limit) in Bloor West Village, defined as the stretch of Bloor St. between Jane St. and Clendenan Ave. 

 

2.  City Council authorize City Planning staff to make minor adjustments to the Mid-Rise Buildings Performance Standards, as amended by Recommendation 1, and as set out in Attachment 1, Chart of Comments and Recommended Actions, to the report (August 28, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 

 

3.  City Council authorize City Planning staff to stylistically format the updated guidelines into the City of Toronto urban design guideline template to be used in the review of mid-rise building development proposals where appropriate. 

 

4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to continue the development of draft built form policies for the purpose of public consultations that include policies for mid-rise buildings and to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee in the fourth quarter of 2016 with respect to such potential Official Plan policies.

 

Background Information (Committee)
(November 4, 2015) Letter from City Council on Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92245.pdf
(August 28, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92246.pdf
Attachment 1: Chart of Comments and Recommended Actions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92233.pdf
Attachment 2: Data Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92234.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92235.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92236.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92237.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92238.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92239.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92240.pdf
Attachment 3: Draft Visual Inventory - Part 7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92241.pdf
Attachment 4: New Table of Contents
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92242.pdf
Attachment 5: Summary of Survey
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92243.pdf
Attachment 6: Chief Planner Roundtable Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92244.pdf
(October 27, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards Monitoring - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92247.pdf
(April 6, 2016) Presentation from the Director, Urban Design on the Mid-Rise Performance Standards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92248.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Veronica Wynne, Director, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association (PG.Main.PG11.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60078.pdf
(January 19, 2016) Letter from Danielle Chin, Senior Manager, Policy and Government Relations, Building Industry and Land Development Association (PG.Main.PG11.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60075.pdf
(January 19, 2016) Letter from Jan Hykamp, President, Greater Beach Neighbourhood Association (PG.Main.PG.11.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60079.pdf
(January 19, 2016) Letter from Eileen Denny, on behalf of Executive Team, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (PG.Main.PG11.3.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60080.pdf
(January 19, 2016) E-mail from Mary Korda (PG.Main.PG11.3.5)
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from E.L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (PG.Main.PG11.3.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60077.pdf
(January 22, 2016) E-mail from Andrew Nicholson, President, Playter Area Residents' Association (PG.Main.PG11.3.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60074.pdf
(April 6, 2016) Letter from Veronica Wynne, Director, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association (PG.New.PG11.3.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60081.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from Eileen Denny, President, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (PG.New.PG11.3.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60082.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from Eileen Denny, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (PG.New.PG 11.3.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60083.pdf

PG12.8 - Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG12.8b with recommendations)

Communications PG12.8.39 to PG12.8.46 have been submitted on this Item.

First item of business on Wednesday, June 8

Bill 585 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the proposed Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan, Attachment 1 to the Supplementary Report (May 9, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, by redesignating the lands south of Judson Street between Royal York Road and Willowbrook Road to "Mixed Use Areas" as described as Option 2 in the Urban Strategies Inc. report dated April, 2015, and referenced in the Directions Report (October 28, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, with a stipulation that the employment has to be built prior to any residential use that shall include 100 percent family sized units.  

 

2.   City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands shown on Attachment 1 to the Supplementary Report (May 9, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

3.  City Council adopt the Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan, attached as Attachment 1 to the Supplementary Report (May 9, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

4.   City Council adopt the Mimico-Judson Urban Design Guidelines, attached as Attachment 2 to Final Report (March 16, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

5.   City Council direct staff to apply the Mimico-Judson Urban Design Guidelines, as amended, in the review of all new development applications and public initiatives for lands located within the Secondary Plan Area.

 

6.   City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 331 attached as Attachment 1 to the Supplementary Report (May 9, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to continue to meet with affected landowners to resolve concerns with the Secondary Plan and report directly to City Council on any proposed amendments to address the concerns.

 

The Planning and Growth Management Committee commenced a statutory public meeting on May 11, 2016 and continued the statutory public meeting on April 11, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(March 16, 2016) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report presents and seeks City Council approval of the recommended Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines.  Together, the Secondary Plan and Guidelines provide a framework to guide the revitalization of the Mimico-Judson Regeneration Area.

 

The recommended Secondary Plan and Guidelines result from the Mimico-Judson Regeneration Areas Study that was initiated in 2013, upon Council’s redesignation of the subject lands from Employment Areas to Regeneration Areas as part of the Municipal Comprehensive Review of employment lands.  The Regeneration Areas Study consisted of extensive public engagement, including a dedicated working group and multiple technical studies conducted by consultants retained by the City.

 

The Secondary Plan policies are based on four guiding principles:  (1) retain and expand business through land use certainty and flexible mixed use regeneration; (2) unlock underutilized lands for transit supportive mixed use development; (3) protect and support existing operations and future expansion opportunities at the Willowbrook Rail Maintenance Facility; and (4) foster a connected and complete community.

 

This report recommends that Council adopt the revised Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines.  The report outlines the key findings from additional engagement with affected landowners and summarizes the revisions to the Secondary Plan that have been incorporated since the Planning and Growth Management Committee's consideration of the proposed Secondary Plan at its meeting on January 20, 2016.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 16, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 - Official Plan Amendment No. 331 (Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan) and 3 - Directions Report, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning, on Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92229.pdf
Attachment 2 - Part 1 - Mimico-Judson Urban Design Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92230.pdf
Attachment 2 - Part 2 - Mimico-Judson Urban Design Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92232.pdf
(March 11, 2016) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-92231.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(June 6, 2016) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines (PG12.8b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-94048.pdf

Speakers

David McKay, MHBC Planning, Urban Design & Landscape Architecture
Mary Flynn-Giugletti, Mcmillan LLP
Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott
Martin E. Gerwin, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Community Network
Judith Rutledge, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Community Network
Kate Cooper, Partner, Bousfields Inc. representing 1742875 Ontario Inc., and 1720194 Ontario Inc.(“Dunpar”) and Freed Development Corporation
Adam Snow, Metrolinx
Sam Piscione
Councillor Mark Grimes

Communications (Committee)

(November 9, 2015) Letter from Leslie Woo, Chief Planning Officer, Metrolinx (PG.Main.PG12.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-59971.pdf
(November 13, 2015) Letter from Peter Smith, Bousfields Inc., representing Freed Development Corp. (PG.Main.PG12.8.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-59979.pdf
(November 13, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes (PG.Main.PG12.8.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-59972.pdf
(November 13, 2015) Letter from Peter Jakovcic, Director of Land Development, Dunpar Homes (PG.Main.PG12.8.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-59973.pdf
(November 13, 2015) E-mail from Chris Moore (PG.Main.PG12.8.5)
(November 14, 2015) E-mail from John Cary President, Mimico Residents Association (PG.Main.PG12.8.6)
(January 12, 2016) Letter from James Lethbridge, James Lethbridge Planning, on behalf of Teresa De Zen and John De Zen (PG.Main.PG12.8.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-59976.pdf
(January 19, 2016) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (PG.Main.PG12.8.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-59977.pdf
(January 19, 2016) Letter from Matthew A. Di Vona, Davies Howe LLP, representing ML Ready Mix Concrete Inc. (PG.Main.PG12.8.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-59978.pdf
(February 22, 2016) E-mail from Lee-Ann Marquez, The New Toronto Studios (PG.Main.PG12.8.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60063.pdf
(March 8, 2016) Letter from Daniel B. Artenosi, Overland LLP, Representing Freed Grand Park Development Inc. (PG.Main.PG12.8.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60064.pdf
(March 22, 2016) Letter from Ed Marquez, New Toronto Studios (PG.Main.PG12.8.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60068.pdf
(April 4, 2016) E-mail from Jan Vanderwal (PG.Main.PG12.8.13)
(April 4, 2016) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti. McMillan, on behalf of 1742875 Ontario Inc., and 1720194 Ontario Inc. ("Dunpar") (PG.Main.PG12.8.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60066.pdf
(April 4, 2016) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans, LLP (PG.Main.PG12.8.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60067.pdf
(April 4, 2016) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot, representing CIC Management Services Inc. (Dunpar) (PG.Main.PG12.8.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-59980.pdf
(April 4, 2016) Letter from Ed and Lee-Ann Marquez, New Toronto Studios (PG.Main.PG12.8.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60061.pdf
(April 4, 2016) Letter from Daniel Artenosi, Overland LLP, Freed Grand Park Development Inc. (PG.Main.PG12.8.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60069.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Rutledge, Co-chairs, Mimico-Lakeshore Community Network Steering Committee (PG.Main.PG12.8.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60070.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners, LLP, representing Remicorp Industries Inc. (PG.Main.PG12.8.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60062.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP (PG.Main.PG12.8.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60071.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore (PG.Main.PG12.8.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60072.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from Leslie Woo, Chief Planning Officer, METROLINX (PG.Main.PG12.8.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60073.pdf
(April 28, 2016) Letter from John Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP (PG.Main.PG12.8.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60408.pdf
(May 4, 2016) E-mail from Harry Oussoren (PG.Supp.PG12.8.25)
(May 5, 2016) E-mail from Robert Ruggerio (PG.Supp.PG12.8.26)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Sam Piscione (PG.Supp.PG12.8.27)
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan, LLP (PG.Supp.PG12.8.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60525.pdf
(May 10, 2016) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot (PG.New.PG12.8.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60533.pdf
(May 10, 2016) Letter from Russ Ford, ED, LAMP Community Health Centre (PG.New.PG12.8.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60591.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Barry Horosko, Horosko Planning Law (PG.New.PG12.8.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60592.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfields Inc. (PG.New.PG12.8.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60593.pdf
(May 10, 2016) E-mail from Dan E. Irwin (PG.New.PG12.8.33)
(May 10, 2016) E-mail from Joanne and Dave Cortellessa (PG.New.PG12.8.34)
(May 10, 2016) E-mail from Abbe Edelson, Member of the Ward 6 CAT (Community Action Team) (PG.New.PG12.8.35)
(May 10, 2016) Letter from Michael S. Manett, M Plan Inc. (PG.New.PG12.8.36)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60597.pdf
(May 10, 2016) Letter from Al Brezina, Executive Director, South Etobicoke Industrial Employers' Association (SEIEA) (PG.New.PG12.8.37)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60610.pdf
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from John Zanini, Dunpar (PG.New.PG12.8.38)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-60614.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(May 30, 2016) Letter from Michael S. Manett, MPLAN Inc. (CC.Main.PG12.8.39)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61121.pdf
(June 2, 2016) Letter from Greg Percy, Chief Operating Officer, Metrolinx (CC.Supp.PG12.8.40)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61142.pdf
(June 4, 2016) Letter from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Rutledge, Co-chairs, Mimico Lakeshore Community Network (MLCN) Steering Committee (CC.Supp.PG12.8.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61130.pdf
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Barry A. Horosko, Horosko Planning Law (CC.New.PG12.8.42)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61137.pdf
(June 5, 2016) Letter from Timothy Dobson, Chair, Lakeshore Planning Council Corp. (CC.New.PG12.8.43)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61148.pdf
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Al Brezina, Executive Director, South Etobicoke Industrial Employers' Association (CC.New.PG12.8.44)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61155.pdf
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Paul Chomik (CC.New.PG12.8.45)
(June 7, 2016) Letter from Gordon Sproule, Sproule Specialty Roofing Ltd. (CC.New.PG12.8.46)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61210.pdf

8a - Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines - Supplementary Report

Origin
(May 9, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
Summary

At its meeting of April 6, 2016, Planning and Growth Management Committee (PGMC) adjourned the statutory public meeting for the Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines and directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to hold a community open house prior to the PGMC meeting of May 11, 2016. Staff conducted a community open house and held a number of meetings with landowners and prospective developers following the April 6th meeting of Committee.

 

This report summarizes the outcome of these meetings and proposes additional changes to the proposed amendment as a result of these meetings and further analysis conducted by staff. Changes to the Secondary Plan are described in the report and incorporated into

Attachment 1 for consideration by the PGMC at the continuation of the statutory public meeting on May11, 2016. No changes were made to the recommended Mimico-Judson Urban Design Guidelines.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 9, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Mimico-Judson Secondary Plan and Urban Design Guidelines - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-93000.pdf

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 13

PW13.1 - Non-competitive Contracts with various Contractors for Proprietary Parts and Services for Toronto Water, Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant (ABTP)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water to negotiate and enter into non-competitive agreements with the vendors listed in Appendix A in the report (April 19, 2016) from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Toronto Water and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.  The contracts will be for a period from the date of issue to December 31, 2016, with the option to renew for additional eight (8) separate one (1) year periods at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approval(s).  The contracts will also be on the conditions that the vendors continue to be the manufacturers or are exclusive distributors for the goods and services. The estimated amount of these non-competitive contracts is $3,527,252.00 net of HST ($3,589,332.00 net of HST recoveries).

Origin

(April 19, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request Council authority to enter into new non-competitive contracts to maintain recently installed original equipment that will no longer be covered by warranty.  The new contracts are with the companies noted below, being the exclusive distributors or manufacturers of proprietary parts and services, for a total of $3,527,252.00 net of HST ($3,589,332.00 net of HST recoveries).  The initial term of the contracts will be from the date of issue to December 31, 2016, with the option to renew for eight (8) additional one (1) year periods.

 

1.  Vector Process Equipment Inc.

2.  Biorem

3.  Mettler Toledo Inc.

4.  Envirocan Wastewater Treatment Co. Ltd. of Woodbridge

5.  Automated Logic United Technologies

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195-Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five year commitment limit under Section 1 of the Purchasing By-Law and also exceed the threshold of $500,000 net of HST allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71- Financial Control, Section 71-11A.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 19, 2016) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on Non-competitive Contracts with various Contractors for Proprietary Parts and Services for Toronto Water, Ashbridges Bay Treatment Plant (ABTP)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92719.pdf

PW13.4 - Non-competitive Contracts with Alfa Laval Inc., and Pro Aqua Inc., for Proprietary Parts, Equipment, and Services at Various Water Treatment and Waste Water Facilities

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive agreement with the Alfa Laval Inc. for the continued supply of proprietary parts, equipment and service from the date contract is issued to March 31, 2017, and further, with the option to renew for additional five (5) separate one (1) year periods, at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approval(s), for the amount of $4,317,507.44 net of HST ($4,393,495.57 net of HST recoveries) on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Toronto Water and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive agreement with the Pro Aqua Inc. for the continued supply of proprietary parts, equipment and service from the date contract is issued to March 31, 2017, and further, with the option to renew for five additional (5) separate one (1) year periods, at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approval(s), for the amount of $1,959,835.69 net of HST ($1,994,328.80 net of HST recoveries) on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Toronto Water and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(April 18, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority for the General Manager to negotiate and enter into non-competitive contracts with Alfa Laval Inc. and Pro Aqua Inc. These contracts are for the continued supply of proprietary parts, equipment and service for the process equipment used at various water treatment and waste water facilities from the date contract is issued to March 31, 2017, with the option to renew for additional five (5) separate one (1) year periods, at the sole discretion of the City and subject to budget approval(s), for the total amount of $6,277,343.13 net of HST and $6,387,824.37 net of HST recoveries.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195-Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five year commitment limit under Section 1 of the Purchasing By-Law and also exceed the threshold of $500,000 net of HST allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71- Financial Control, Section 71-11A.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 18, 2016) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on Non-competitive Contracts with Alfa Laval Inc., and Pro Aqua Inc., for Proprietary Parts, Equipment, and Services at Various Water Treatment and Waste Water Facilities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92720.pdf

PW13.7 - Construction Coordination Agreement with Toronto Hydro

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to negotiate and execute a Construction Coordination Agreement on terms similar to those outlined in the report (April 20, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and in a form that is acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services, the General Manager of Toronto Water, and the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, to ensure that construction budgets for capital projects reflect the cost to protect, restore or replace Toronto Hydro assets that will be incorporated in City construction projects under the process set out in the Construction Coordination Agreement.

 

3.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to negotiate and execute Project Specific Agreements in accordance with the Construction Coordination Agreement in a form that is acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

4.  City Council authorize the Director, Major Capital Infrastructure Coordination to amend and update the Schedules to the Construction Coordination Agreement from time-to-time.

 

5.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Policy, Planning, Finance and Administration to implement a cost-recovery model, including billing and collection procedures, to ensure the timely exchange of funds between the City and Toronto Hydro arising from the Construction Coordination Agreement.

 

6.  City Council authorize the Director, Major Capital Infrastructure Coordination to monitor the effectiveness of the Construction Coordination Agreement, and recommend steps that may be taken by the City and Toronto Hydro to promote compliance and achieve the stated objectives of the Construction Coordination Agreement.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Summary

This report seeks authority for the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to execute a Construction Coordination Agreement (the "Agreement") with Toronto Hydro Electric System Limited ("Toronto Hydro"). The Agreement will permit the City to relocate or replace Toronto Hydro assets that are affected by, or might act as an impediment to, City construction projects.

 

The Agreement will have incremental costs and cost-sharing implications for the City. The nature of these additional costs is explained in the Financial Impact and Comments sections of this report.

 

In summary, approval of this report will permit City staff to:

 

a.  Initiate inspections of Toronto Hydro infrastructure, and quickly obtain permission from Toronto Hydro to relocate or replace Toronto Hydro assets that are affected by City construction;

 

b.  Plan the restoration or replacement of Toronto Hydro infrastructure as part of the scope of City construction, thereby achieving more efficient infrastructure planning, more effective construction management, and avoidance of excessive construction disruption; and

 

c.  Incur the incremental cost to design and construct Toronto Hydro infrastructure in accordance with the cost-sharing formula prescribed in the Agreement.

 

City staff will monitor the effectiveness of the Agreement in achieving the preceding goals, including value-for-money. Improvements to the terms of the Agreement that may benefit the City and Toronto Hydro, and ultimately the public, will be implemented as experience is gained by both parties in fulfilling their respective obligations.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on Construction Coordination Agreement with Toronto Hydro
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92751.pdf

PW13.8 - Authority to Enter into Renewable Natural Gas Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant authority for the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to enter into Renewable Natural Gas Projects and agreements on such terms that are satisfactory to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, based on the environmental/business case presented in Attachment 1 to the report (April 29, 2016) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services be authorized to execute these projects up until December 31, 2021.

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services or his delegate, to administer and manage the Renewable Natural Gas Projects, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination, provided that the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

3.  City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to report back to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the results of any Renewable Natural Gas Projects.

 

4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to investigate options for funding the cost of the Renewable Natural Gas Projects through green energy funding opportunities.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services gave a presentation to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.

Origin

(April 29, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to obtain City Council authority to explore and develop Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) Projects at various Solid Waste Management Services' facilities, including Green Lane Landfill, Keele Valley Landfill, the Disco Road Organics Processing Facility and the Dufferin Organics Processing Facility (the "sites").  Staff will report on the results of any RNG Projects that derive a strong environmental/business case. These projects represent a shift in typical biogas/landfill gas utilization projects, away from electricity generation, and instead towards the production of a more valuable renewable resource, namely RNG, thus providing increased economic benefits. In addition, environmental benefits realized from the avoidance of diesel/natural gas consumption are orders of magnitude larger than those realized from the displacement of electricity, given that Ontario's electricity mix is already quite clean (~90 percent clean).

 

A previous request for authority to enter into an agreement to produce RNG with Enbridge Distribution Inc. was previously granted by City Council on May 18, 2010; however, due to various circumstances at the time, an agreement with Enbridge was never concluded. Currently, more favourable market conditions, a renewed effort at all orders of government to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs) and more proven biogas/landfill gas upgrading technology have combined to once again drive interest in the production and utilization of RNG.

 

RNG is chemically identical to natural gas and can be transported via the current natural gas supply pipeline. It can also be compressed and used to fuel natural gas vehicles, which presents extremely favourable environmental, social, and economic outcomes. Essentially, we will be harnessing the biogas generated at our waste management facilities to fuel our solid waste collection fleet in the future.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 29, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on Authority to Enter into Renewable Natural Gas Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92679.pdf
Attachment 1 - Environmental/Business Case for Renewable Natural Gas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92740.pdf
Presentation Materials from the Solid Waste Management Services on Renewable Natural Gas - Demonstration Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-93087.pdf

PW13.9 - Traffic Control Signals - Finch Avenue West, 280m West of Sentinel Road and the Finch West LRT

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to continue to work with Metrolinx to protect for the future installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Finch Avenue West and the future extension of Fountainhead Road, as approved at City Council in 2010, during the design and construction of the Finch West LRT.

 

2. City Council direct that the costs of changing the slope of the road or any other measures to accommodate stopping of the LRT vehicles at the existing pedestrian traffic control signal on Finch Avenue West 280m west of Sentinel Road or the future Fountainhead Road traffic control signal (approximately 20m west of the existing traffic control signal), be considered base costs for the project and not be considered incremental costs to be funded as part of the "Additional Infrastructure" category associated with the Metrolinx project.

Origin

(March 30, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is responding to a request from Public Works and Infrastructure Committee to the future installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Finch Avenue West and Fountainhead Road, in view of the future Finch West LRT in this area.

 

As part of the review of Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Applications for

470 Sentinel Road and 1, 35 and 40 Fountainhead Road and 35 Fountainhead Road Draft Plan of Subdivision, necessary improvements to Fountainhead Road and Finch Avenue West were identified to accommodate increased traffic demands in the vicinity of this development, primarily, the extension of Fountainhead Road and the installation of a new full moves intersection with Finch Avenue West.

 

The installation of these traffic control signals will provide continued crossing facilities for pedestrians and improve the operation of the traffic control signals at the nearby intersection of Finch Avenue West and Sentinel Road.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 30, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Traffic Control Signals - Finch Avenue West and 280m West of Sentinel Road (future Fountainhead Road Extension)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92550.pdf
Attachment 1 - Drawing No. NYRD16-0014.DGN, dated February 2016, entitled "Finch Avenue West and Fountainhead Road Future Traffic Control Signal"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92551.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Decision Letter from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on Item PW12.13 - Traffic Control Signals - Finch Avenue West, 280m West of Sentinel Road and the Finch West LRT
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92663.pdf

PW13.10 - Liberty New Street - Environmental Assessment Study

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
14 - Parkdale-High Park, 19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Communication PW13.10.12 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council endorse the recommendations included in the Liberty New Street Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (MCEA) Study.

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to issue a Notice of Completion and file the Environmental Study Report (ESR) for the Liberty New Street Study in the public record for a minimum 30 days, in accordance with the requirements of the MCEA.

 

3.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to prepare an Official Plan Amendment to protect the lands needed for the Liberty New Street between Strachan Avenue and Dufferin Street north of the existing GO Transit Lake Shore West rail corridor.

 

4.  City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services, to develop a financial strategy that aims to fund the implementation of the Liberty New Street from other funding options, reporting back to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in June 2017.

 

5. City Council affirm its intent to implement a collector road between Dufferin Street and Strachan Avenue which will, among its purposes, serve as a by-pass to King Street for motorists.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:

 

1. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to report on a contingency plan in case the private lands are not acquired to complete the phases as described in the report (March 30, 2016) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, or financial resources to acquire the lands are not approved; and report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee following the 2017 budget process on an implementation plan once financial resources have been established.

Origin

(March 30, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Liberty and King Liberty Village areas of the City contain significant residential and employment lands and are experiencing strong growth. Congestion within this area of the City is increasing and improved accessibility and connectivity has been identified as a key need.

 

At its meeting of November 13, 2008, Planning and Growth Management Committee directed staff to undertake an Environmental Assessment (EA) to secure planning approvals for the design and implementation of a local, east-west street north of the railway corridor in the Liberty Village area.

 

A Municipal Class EA has been completed and the recommended plan includes a new east-west street, extending between Strachan Avenue and Dufferin Street. The new street would be located north of the Lake Shore West GO Transit rail corridor and would improve accessibility to and from Liberty Village and connectivity throughout.

 

Based on preliminary estimates, the new road will cost approximately $68 to $75 million. This includes design and construction costs and potential property acquisition costs. Funds for the Liberty New Street are not currently included in the 10-year capital plan and, therefore, a financial strategy needs to be developed to identify various City and non-City funding sources.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 30, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Liberty New Street - Environmental Assessment Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92535.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Decision Letter from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on Item PW12.12 - Liberty New Street - Environmental Assessment Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92662.pdf

Speakers

Rod Bell, Chairman, Liberty Village Business Improvement Area
Robert Eisenberg, York Heritage Properties
Antony Hilliard, Cycle Toronto Ward 19 Group
Hamish Wilson
Todd Hofley, Liberty Village Residents' Association
Lorna Tomassoni, South Parkdale Neighbourhood Group

Communications (Committee)

(April 22, 2016) E-mail from Alexandrina Canto Thaler (PW.Main.PW13.10.1)
(April 22, 2016) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PW.Main.PW13.10.2)
(April 22, 2016) Letter from Andrew Jeanrie, Associate, Bennett Jones LLP (PW.Main.PW13.10.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60237.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Letter from Mark Piel, Dentons Canada LLP (PW.Main.PW13.10.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60236.pdf
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Jim Vafiades (PW.New.PW13.10.5)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Simon Gitalis, Realtor, Abe Gitalis Real Estate Ltd. (PW.New.PW13.10.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60522.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Jane Siklos (PW.New.PW13.10.7)
(May 15, 2016) E-mail from Chris Fraser, Moveable Inc (PW.New.PW13.10.8)
(May 13, 2016) Letter from Mike Zenker, Kevric Real Estate Corporation Inc, Vice President Greater Toronto Area (PW.New.PW13.10.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60753.pdf
(May 16, 2016) E-mail from Alicia Kuntz, Vice President, Development, First Capital Asset Management ULC (PW.New.PW13.10.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60755.pdf
(May 16, 2016) Letter from Leona Savoie, Hullmark Developments Ltd (PW.New.PW13.10.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60765.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 5, 2016) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.PW13.10.12)

PW13.11 - Ten Year Cycling Network Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Transportation Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PW13.11a for information).

Communications PW13.11.135 to PW13.11.150 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt in principle the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan as outlined in the report (May 3, 2016) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and mapped by district in Appendices 1-4 in this report, excluding the proposed Major Corridor Studies except those currently underway, with implementation of individual projects in this plan subject to future City Council approval, as appropriate.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider, as part of the annual capital and operating budget process, the capital funding required to implement the proposed Ten Year Cycling Network Plan at a rate of $16 million dollars annually as outlined in Scenario 3 in Appendix 8 in the report (May 3, 2016) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, as well as the operating budget required to fund the maintenance costs of newly constructed cycling infrastructure.

 

3.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake detailed design and public consultation required to deliver cycling infrastructure projects contained within the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan.

 

4.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake a review of the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan in two years, with a report back to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, in the fourth quarter of 2018, regarding implementation progress and a review of project timing, potential increase in funding levels and recommendations for the initiation of additional Major Corridor Studies.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:

 

1. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to report directly to City Council on: 

 

a.  Which projects will likely involve the removal of a traffic lane or changes to parking/no-stopping bylaws;

 

b.  A procedure by which a poll through the City Clerk is conducted for projects which require changes to parking and no-stopping by-laws, and/or the removal of a traffic lane, on roads in front of homes and businesses;

 

c.  The delegation of implementation decisions for those projects to the Community Council, or to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, in the case where the project overlaps more than one district;

 

d.  An updated map of the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan reflecting the above changes to the Major Corridor Studies to be included within the plan;

 

e.  An updated summary of the $16 Million Annual Capital Funding Scenario indicating proposed timing of projects reflecting the above changes to the Major Corridor Studies included within the plan; and

 

f.  Additional information on the anticipated impacts to motor vehicle traffic and/or on- street parking for each of the cycling infrastructure projects proposed, where applicable.

 

2.  Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to include the following as part of the public and stakeholder consultation process prior to implementation of projects and as part of the Major Corridor studies currently underway, as appropriate:

 

a.  A survey of all businesses and/or Business Improvement Associations as appropriate in the proposed area of implementation and/or study; and

 

b.  A survey of all residents in the proposed area of implementation and/or study.

 

3.  Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider, during the detailed design phase of each project outlined in the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan, as appropriate to the project:

 

a.  connectivity to nearby cycling routes;

 

b.  cycling volumes on nearby cycling routes;

 

c.  expected impacts on traffic flow in the proposed area of implementation;

 

d.  expected impacts on on-street and off-street parking, including parking availability and revenue to the Toronto Parking Authority;

 

e.  expected impacts on adjacent streets, including possible cut-through traffic infiltration or reduced availability for parking permit holders; and

 

f.  expected impacts on loading and deliveries for retail operations.

 

4.  Referred the following Motion by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon to the General Manager, Transportation Services for consideration:

 

"That City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to include a cycling infrastructure connection on Broadview Avenue, O'Connor Drive and Pape Avenue from Chester Hill Road to the Millwood Road Bridge as part of the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan."

Origin

(May 3, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Ten Year Cycling Network Plan will serve as a comprehensive roadmap and workplan, outlining the City's planned investments in cycling infrastructure over 2016-2025. This report provides an overview of the process undertaken to develop the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan and describes five implementation options for consideration in the 2017 Capital Budget process.

 

The Ten Year Cycling Network Plan will build on the City's existing network of cycling routes by identifying potential cycling network projects to fulfill the project mandate:

 

-  Connect the gaps in our existing Cycling Network;

-  Grow the Cycling Network into new parts of the City; and

-  Renew the existing Cycling Network routes, to improve their quality.

 

Since November 2014, a significant amount of cycling impact analysis as well as public and stakeholder consultation has been undertaken. Extensive field work to inform new route feasibility assessments was undertaken to identify the proposed routes.

 

The proposed Ten Year Cycling Network Plan identifies approximately 525 centreline kilometres (km) of new infrastructure (if counted in each lane direction, more than 1000 lane km).  This proposed new network includes;

 

-  280 centreline km of bicycle lanes or cycle tracks on Fast, Busy Streets

-  55 centreline km of sidewalk-level boulevard trails along Fast, Busy Streets

-  190 centreline km of cycling routes along Quiet Streets

 

Included within this proposed network are approximately 100 centreline km along eight arterial roadways (split into seventeen segments) for which Major Corridor Studies would be undertaken to evaluate the feasibility of bicycle lanes or cycle tracks.

 

The deliverables recommended in this report represent the outcome of cycling impact analysis, feasibility analysis, capital works coordination and consultation. Subject to the approval of the recommendations from this report, Transportation Services would initiate the studies, detailed design and public consultation required to deliver the cycling infrastructure projects contained in the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan. At the time that each proposed project is scheduled to be initiated, Transportation Services would work with local area councillors and undertake public consultation as part of the detailed design process and report back to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee for approval, as required.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 3, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Ten Year Cycling Network Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92811.pdf
Appendix 1 - Cycling Network Plan: Toronto East York District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92812.pdf
Appendix 2 - Cycling Network Plan: North York District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92813.pdf
Appendix 3 - Cycling Network Plan: Etobicoke York District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92814.pdf
Appendix 4 - Cycling Network Plan: Scarborough District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92815.pdf
Revised Appendix 5 - Summary: Five Annual Funding Scenarios to Connect, Grow and Renew the Cycling Network
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92816.pdf
Appendix 6 - Scenario 1: $8 Million/Year (Base Case
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92841.pdf
Appendix 7 - Scenario 2: $12 Million/Year
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92842.pdf
Appendix 8 - Scenario 3: $16 Million/Year (Staff Recommended)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92843.pdf
Appendix 9 - Scenario 4: $20 Million/Year
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92845.pdf
Appendix 10 - Scenario 5: $25 Million/Year
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92846.pdf
Appendix 11 - Summary: Cycling Network Facility Type
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92818.pdf
Appendix 12 - Summary: Proposed Barrier Crossings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92819.pdf
Appendix 13 - Beyond the Ten Year Cycling Network Plan: Map of Related Studies and Future Opportunities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-92840.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(June 6, 2016) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Ten Year Cycling Network Plan - Additional Information (PW13.11a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93970.pdf
Appendix 1 - Cycling Network Plan Scenario 3: $16 Million/year
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93971.pdf
Appendix 2 - Scenario 3: $16 Million/year (Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Recommendations)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93972.pdf

Speakers

Suhail Barot, Cycle Toronto Ward 18 Group
Peter Rogers
Robert Zaichkowski, Co-Captain, Cycle Toronto Ward 14 Advocacy Group
Michelle German and Lucas Melbye, Evergreen
Antony Hilliard, Cycle Toronto Ward 19 Group
Jared Kolb, Cycle Toronto
Hamish Wilson
Eli Aaron
Brandon Quigley, Ward 30 Bikes (Cycle Toronto Ward Advocacy Group)
John Godfrey Spragge
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Mike Layton

Communications (Committee)

(April 19, 2016) E-mail from Councillor Paula Fletcher (PW.Main.PW13.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60393.pdf
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Jason Slaughter (PW.New.PW13.11.2)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Bruce Campbell (PW.New.PW13.11.3)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Christopher Bozek (PW.New.PW13.11.4)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Brendan Flattery (PW.New.PW13.11.5)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Zoraida Anaya (PW.Main.PW13.11.6)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Doug Pritchard (PW.New.PW13.11.7)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Paula Grgurich Shewchuk (PW.New.PW13.11.8)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from William Thompson (PW.New.PW13.11.9)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Kelsey Carriere (PW.New.PW13.11.10)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Kathleen Mackey (PW.New.PW13.11.11)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Tom Wright (PW.New.PW13.11.12)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Jordy Gold (PW.New.PW13.11.13)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Tara Dharmarajan (PW.New.PW13.11.14)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Chris Grebeldinger (PW.New.PW13.11.15)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Alex Korobchevsky (PW.New.PW13.11.16)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Greg Van de Mark (PW.New.PW13.11.17)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Eric Adams (PW.New.PW13.11.18)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Michael Polanyi (PW.New.PW13.11.19)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Alison Zimmer (PW.New.PW13.11.20)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Kristen Yee (PW.New.PW13.11.21)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Angela Bischoff (PW.New.PW13.11.22)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Consuelo Castillo (PW.New.PW13.11.23)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from George Hume (PW.New.PW13.11.24)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Patrick Dinnen (PW.New.PW13.11.25)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Julia (PW.New.PW13.11.26)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Mike Caldwell (PW.New.PW13.11.27)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Debra Mewdell (PW.New.PW13.11.28)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from J. Geoff Loughton (PW.New.PW13.11.29)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Andrew Ng (PW.New.PW13.11.30)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Sheryl Gordon (PW.New.PW13.11.31)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Kirsten McCrea (PW.New.PW13.11.32)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Brett Lessard (PW.New.PW13.11.33)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Jim Hedger, Digital Always Media Inc (PW.New.PW13.11.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60641.pdf
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Senwung F. Luk (PW.New.PW13.11.35)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Rav Sean Gorman, Pride of Israel Synagogue (PW.New.PW13.11.36)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60624.pdf
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Cindy Shigetomi (PW.New.PW13.11.37)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Lucy Feng (PW.New.PW13.11.38)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Mary Porter (PW.New.PW13.11.39)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Genet Zinabou (PW.New.PW13.11.40)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Charlotte Elder (PW.New.PW13.11.41)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Ms. Frey (PW.New.PW13.11.42)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Suzan Ayscough (PW.New.PW13.11.43)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Kristine Connidis (PW.New.PW13.11.44)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Janet Joy Wilson (PW.New.PW13.11.45)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Heidi Deschenes and Family (PW.New.PW13.11.46)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Fred Weinstein (PW.New.PW13.11.47)
(May 11, 2016) Letter from Robert Zaichkowski, Co-Captain, Cycle Toronto Ward 14 Advocacy Group (PW.New.PW13.11.48)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60652.pdf
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Steve Heuchert (PW.New.PW13.11.49)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Tom Worrall (PW.New.PW13.11.50)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Kathryn Baker (PW.New.PW13.11.51)
(May 11, 2016) E-mail from Susan Crofts (PW.New.PW13.11.52)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Ted Mann (PW.New.PW13.11.53)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from David Shafir (PW.New.PW13.11.54)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Sheila Miller (PW.New.PW13.11.55)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Catherine Armitage (PW.New.PW13.11.56)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Michael and Jan Gauthier (PW.New.PW13.11.57)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Elizabeth Rees (PW.New.PW13.11.58)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Ian Worling (PW.New.PW13.11.59)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Juliet Palmer (PW.New.PW13.11.60)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Chris Kirkpatrick (PW.New.PW13.11.61)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Graham Lavender (PW.New.PW13.11.62)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Andrew (PW.New.PW13.11.63)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Jessica Warner (PW.New.PW13.11.64)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Sylvia Slaughter (PW.New.PW13.11.65)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Michal Merkur (PW.New.PW13.11.66)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Paul Calarco (PW.New.PW13.11.67)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Deborah (PW.New.PW13.11.68)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Chris Heron (PW.New.PW13.11.69)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from François Routhier (PW.New.PW13.11.70)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Christie Pearson (PW.New.PW13.11.71)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Tania Szablowski (PW.New.PW13.11.72)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Gary Moloney (PW.New.PW13.11.73)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Wayne Copeland (PW.New.PW13.11.74)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Amy Coulterman (PW.New.PW13.11.75)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Fred Spek (PW.New.PW13.11.76)
(May 11, 2016) Letter from the Danforth Business Improvement Area (BIA), Board of Directors, submitted by Susan Puff, Executive Director, the Danforth BIA (PW.New.PW13.11.77)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60666.pdf
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Gideon Forman, Climate Change and Transportation Policy Analyst, David Suzuki Foundation (PW.New.PW13.11.78)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60667.pdf
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Tim Eddis (PW.New.PW13.11.79)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Raj Bharati (PW.New.PW13.11.80)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from John C.P. King (PW.New.PW13.11.81)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Blake Richards (PW.New.PW13.11.82)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Maxine Chan (PW.New.PW13.11.83)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from David Simmons (PW.New.PW13.11.84)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Sam Bootsma (PW.New.PW13.11.85)
(May 12, 2016) E-mail from Marcus Jansen (PW.New.PW13.11.86)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Andy Inkster (PW.New.PW13.11.87)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Constance Friesen (PW.New.PW13.11.88)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Patrick Durieu (PW.New.PW13.11.89)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Alison V Stewart (PW.New.PW13.11.90)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Hanno Rein (PW.New.PW13.11.91)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Oliver Terry (PW.New.PW13.11.92)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Burns Wattie (PW.New.PW13.11.93)
(May 13, 2016) Submission from Suhail Barot, Cycle Toronto Ward 15 and 18 Groups (PW.New.PW13.11.94)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60705.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Lars Jorgensen (PW.New.PW13.11.95)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Michael Black (PW.New.PW13.11.96)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Tayves Fiddis (PW.New.PW13.11.97)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Stéphane Levac (PW.New.PW13.11.98)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Geoffrey Lynch (PW.New.PW13.11.99)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Rhonda Major (PW.New.PW13.11.100)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW13.11.101)
(May 13, 2016) Submission from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW13.11.102)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Rachael Cayley (PW.New.PW13.11.103)
(May 13, 2016) Letter from Brandon Quigley, Co-chair, Ward 30 Bikes (PW.New.PW13.11.104)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60723.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Charles Valente (PW.New.PW13.11.105)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Joe Travers, Co-Captain, Ward 31 Bikes (PW.New.PW13.11.106)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60726.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Patrick DeRochie (PW.New.PW13.11.107)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Chris Moore, President, Mimico Residents Association (PW.New.PW13.11.108)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60728.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Christopher Hoyle (PW.New.PW13.11.109)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Jen Knoch (PW.New.PW13.11.110)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Fiona Campbell, President, Kingsway Park Ratepayers Inc addressed to Councilor Justin DiCiano, submitted to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee (PW.New.PW13.11.111)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60731.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Mary Ann Neary and Adam Smith on behalf of the membership of Ward 32 Spokes, Toronto, submitted by Greg Burrell (PW.New.PW13.11.112)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60732.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Lisa Quirke (PW.New.PW13.11.113)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Rita van der Heiden (PW.New.PW13.11.114)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Audrey Kvedaras, Danforth East Community Association (DECA), Vice Chair (PW.New.PW13.11.115)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60735.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from The Kojfman-Radcliffe Family (PW.New.PW13.11.116)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Lauren Corindia (PW.New.PW13.11.117)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Douglas Yardley (PW.New.PW13.11.118)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Michael Warren (PW.New.PW13.11.119)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Albert Koehl (PW.New.PW13.11.120)
(May 13, 2016) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Louis Fliss, Co-Captains Cycle 26 (PW.New.PW13.11.121)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60741.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from John Spragge (PW.New.PW13.11.122)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Peter Rogers (PW.New.PW13.11.123)
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (PW.New.PW13.11.124)
(May 12, 2016) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher (PW.New.PW13.11.125)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60747.pdf
(May 13, 2016) E-mail from Shin Imai (PW.New.PW13.11.126)
(May 14, 2016) E-mail from Caullyn Godfrey, Riverdale Cleaners - Professional Wet Cleaning (PW.New.PW13.11.127)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60749.pdf
(May 14, 2016) E-mail from Ben Hanff (PW.New.PW13.11.128)
(May 14, 2016) E-mail from Oliver (PW.New.PW13.11.129)
(May 13, 2016) Letter from Billy Dertilis, Chair, Danforth Mosaic BIA (PW.New.PW13.11.130)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-60756.pdf
(May 14, 2016) E-mail from Oonagh Maley (PW.New.PW13.11.131)
(May 15, 2016) E-mail from Nalin Sahni (PW.New.PW13.11.132)
(May 15, 2016) E-mail from Dr. Peter Sakuls (PW.New.PW13.11.133)
(May 15, 2016) E-mail from Dennis Glasgow (PW.New.PW13.11.134)

Communications (City Council)

(May 20, 2016) E-mail from Robert Lawson (CC.Main.PW13.11.135)
(May 30, 2016) E-mail from Mike Kapler (CC.Main.PW13.11.136)
(May 20, 2016) E-mail from Gillian Grace (CC.Main.PW13.11.137)
(May 20, 2016) E-mail from Karen Ryan (CC.Main.PW13.11.138)
(May 19, 2016) E-mail from Gary Fong (CC.Main.PW13.11.139)
(May 25, 2016) E-mail from Tess Shields and Ella (CC.Main.PW13.11.140)
(May 31, 2016) E-mail from Jordan Weaver (CC.Main.PW13.11.141)
(June 3, 2016) Letter from John Taranu, on behalf of Cycle Toronto Midtown: Ward 16 and Ward 22 Advocacy Group (CC.Supp.PW13.11.142)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61143.pdf
(June 3, 2016) E-mail from Ian Flett (CC.Supp.PW13.11.143)
(June 4, 2016) E-mail from Leslie O'Reilly (CC.Supp.PW13.11.144)
(June 5, 2016) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.PW13.11.145)
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Gerry P. Brown (CC.New.PW13.11.146)
(June 3, 2016) E-mail from Asa Weinstein and Meredith Heron (CC.New.PW13.11.147)
(June 3, 2016) E-mail from Michael Holloway (CC.New.PW13.11.148)
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Louis Fliss, Co-Chairs, Cycle 26 (CC.New.PW13.11.149)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61156.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Letter from Lulu Gzowski and Charlotte Hayes, submitted by Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth (CC.New.PW13.11.150)

Striking Committee - Meeting 9

ST9.1 - Appointment to fill vacancies on the Audit Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint Councillor Vincent Crisanti to the Audit Committee for a term ending December 31, 2016 and until a successor is appointed.

 

2.  City Council leave the one remaining vacancy on the Audit Committee open until such time as the vacancy for the office of Councillor, Ward 2 - Etobicoke North is filled.

Origin

(May 18, 2016) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The purpose of this report is to fill two vacancies on the Audit Committee resulting from the passing of Councillor Rob Ford and the resignation of Councillor Frances Nunziata from the Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 18, 2016) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment to fill vacancies on the Audit Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-93128.pdf
Attachment 1: Members' preferences for appointment to the Audit Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-93129.pdf
Attachment 2: Resignation letter from Councillor Frances Nunziata
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-93130.pdf

ST9.2 - Appointment to fill a vacancy on the Board of Health

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint Councillor Paula Fletcher to the Board of Health for a term starting August 1, 2016 and ending December 31, 2016 and until a successor is appointed.

Origin

(May 18, 2016) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The purpose of this report is to fill an upcoming vacancy on the Board of Health resulting from the resignation of Councillor Jon Burnside from the Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 18, 2016) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment to fill a vacancy on the Board of Health
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-93131.pdf
Revised Attachment 1: Members' preferences for appointment to the Board of Health
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-93132.pdf
Attachment 2: Resignation letter from Councillor Jon Burnside
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-93133.pdf

ST9.3 - Council Member Appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone Executive Management Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.   City Council appoint Councillor Chin Lee to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone Executive Management Committee for a term of office until December 31, 2017 and until a successor is appointed.

Origin

(May 18, 2016) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the appointment of one Member of Council to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone Executive Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 18, 2016) Report from the City Clerk on Council Member Appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone Executive Management Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-93134.pdf
Revised Attachment 1: Members' preferences for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Partners in Project Green: A Pearson Eco-Business Zone Executive Management Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-93135.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(May 24, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19, Trinity-Spadina, regarding Council Member appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Partners in Project Green (ST.New.ST9.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/st/comm/communicationfile-61071.pdf

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 14

EY14.1 - Final Report - 325 Horner Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 325 Horner Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the Supplementary Report of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District dated May 9, 2016.

 

2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, for the lands at 325 Horner Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the Supplementary Report of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District dated May 9, 2016.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit the construction of a new gasoline service station with a convenience retail store at 325 Horner Avenue. The development would be one-storey in height, contain 6 fuel pumps, have a gross floor area of 320 m2 and provide 11 parking spaces.  The existing gasoline station on the site would be demolished.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District - 325 Horner Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92522.pdf

1a - Supplementary Report -325 Horner Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Origin
(May 9, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

Subsequent to the preparation of the Final Report recommending approval of this application to permit the construction of a new gasoline service station with a convenience retail store, staff determined that revisions to the Zoning By-law Amendments were required. These revisions are not substantive and do not alter the proposal. This Supplementary Report recommends deleting the Recommendations in the report of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District dated April 22, 2016, and replacing them with the Recommendations contained in this report which includes revised draft Zoning By-law Amendments.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 9, 2016) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 325 Horner Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92931.pdf

EY14.2 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 260 High Park Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Communication EY14.2.5 has been submitted on this Item

Statutory - Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at 260 High Park Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 260 High Park Avenue (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (March 30, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

2.  If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.  If there are objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.  If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

Origin

(March 30, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 260 High Park Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  The site

contains the former High Park-Alhambra United Church, which was listed on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties (now known as the Heritage Register) in 1990.

 

Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  The designation will help to ensure that all of the cultural heritage values and attributes of the property are identified and conserved.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 30, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 260 High Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92013.pdf
Attachment No. 1 - Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92014.pdf
Attachment No. 2 - Photographs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92015.pdf
Attachment No. 3 - Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92016.pdf
Attachment No. 4 - Heritage Property Research and Evaluation Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92017.pdf

Speakers

Christopher Sears, President, West Toronto Junction Historical Society
Tina Leslie, Chair, Junction Heritage Conservation District Committee
Chris Giamou, TRAC Developments Inc.
Sheldon D. Rosen, TRAC Developments Inc.
Brian Mooney, Chair, Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel
Laura Dean, Aird & Berlis, LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(April 25, 2016) Letter from Tina Leslie, Chair, Junction Heritage Conservation District Committee (EY.New.EY14.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60363.pdf
(May 8, 2016) E-mail from Corinne Flitton (EY.New.EY14.2.2)
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Madeleine McDowell (EY.New.EY14.2.3)
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird and Berlis LLP (EY.New.EY14.2.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60478.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 6, 2016) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird and Berlis LLP (CC.New.EY14.2.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61158.pdf

2a - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 260 High Park Avenue

Origin
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on April 21, 2016, considered the following:

 

1.         Report (March 30, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division regarding an Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 260 High Park Avenue.

 

2.         Communications:

(April 19, 2016) Letter from Councillor Sarah Doucette (PB.Supp.PB14.6.1) 
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pb/comm/communicationfile-59965.pdf)
 
(April 20, 2016) Letter from Eileen P.K Costello, Aird & Berlis LLP (PB.Supp.PB14.6.2) 
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pb/comm/communicationfile-60086.pdf)
 
(April 20, 2016) Letter from Catherine Nasmith, President, Architectural Conservancy Ontario, Toronto (PB.Supp.PB14.6.3) 
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pb/comm/communicationfile-60087.pdf)

Background Information (Community Council)
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding 260 High Park Avenue - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92523.pdf

EY14.3 - A Portion of the Lands Formerly Known as 115 Torbarrie Road (Block 152 on Plan 66M-2436) - Extension of Part Lot Control Exemption - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West
Attention
Bill 564 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Schedule "A" to By-law No. 821-2015 to add Parts 230, 231, 232, 234, 237 and 239 on Plan 66R-26186 to the lands that are subject to Part Lot Control Exemption.

 

2.  City Council amend By-law No. 821-2015 to extend the expiration of part lot control exemption until July 9, 2017 with respect to the lands formerly known as 115 Torbarrie Road (Parts 1-20, 29-30, 32-34, 36-42, 49-50, 60, 109-114, 150-151, 155-183, 185-188, 191-193, 221-224, 230-232, 234, 237 and 239 of Block 152 on Plan 66M-2436).

 

3.  City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the By-law extending part lot control exemption.

 

4.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the By-law extending part lot control exemption on title.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application requests an amendment to By-law No. 821-2015 to provide for an extension of part lot control exemption for an additional year with respect to a portion of the lands formerly known as 115 Torbarrie Road (Parts 1-20, 29-30, 32-34, 36-42, 49-50, 109-114, 150-151, 155-183, 185-188, 191-193, 221-224, 230-232, 234 and 239 of Block 152 on Plan 66M-2436). The extension would only apply to lots which are still under construction or have not yet been conveyed to the individual purchasers. The exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act would permit the creation of conveyable lots for the development of 82 townhouse dwelling units.
 
The proposal complies with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The extension of the expiry of the part lot control exemption for an additional year is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the extension to the expiry of the Part Lot Control exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding A Portion of the Lands Formerly Known as 115 Torbarrie Road (Block 152 on Plan 66M-2436) - Extension of Part Lot Control Exemption - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92524.pdf

3a - A Portion of the Lands Formerly Known as 115 Torbarrie Road (Block 152 on Plan 66M-2436) - Extension of Part Lot Control Exemption - Supplementary Report

Origin
(May 9, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

By-law No. 821-2015 lifted Part Lot Control for several Parts on Plan 66R-26186 in order to allow for the creation of freehold lots to be sold to the public. The legal description in Schedule "A" to By-law 821-2015 inadvertently left out six parts (Parts 230-232, 234, 237 and 239) on Plan 66R-26186 that are very small portions of future freehold lots. Therefore, an amendment to Schedule "A" is required to add these parts to the legal description to which the By-law applies.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 9, 2016) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding A Portion of the Lands Formerly Known as 115 Torbarrie Road (Block 152 on Plan 66M-2436) - Extension of Part Lot Control Exemption - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92959.pdf

EY14.4 - Homes on Weston Road Between Wilson Avenue and Bradstock Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to bring forward a Zoning By-law Amendment to a Public Meeting under the Planning Act to legalize the existing front yard conditions for the properties municipally known as 2980, 3012, 3036, 3038, 3040, 3042, 3046, 3048, 3052, 3056, 3058, 3060, 3062, 3064, 3066, 3068 Weston Road.

Origin

(January 7, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

At its meeting on June 16, 2015, Etobicoke York Community Council requested that Municipal Licensing and Standards staff grant homeowners on Weston Road, between Wilson Avenue and Bradstock Road who had been issued Notices of Violation, an extension beyond 30 days to comply with the Zoning By-law.  Etobicoke York Community Council also requested that City Planning and Municipal Licensing and Standards staff prepare a report for consideration at the September 8, 2015 meeting of the Etobicoke York Community Council, with a view of either exempting the homeowners or amending the Zoning By-law in order to bring the driveways into compliance.

 

At its meeting on October 6, 2015, Etobicoke York Community Council deferred consideration of this Item until its January 19, 2016 meeting.

 

This report describes the Zoning By-law performance standards related to driveways and front yard landscaping and provides information with respect to the Notices of Violation that have been issued for certain homeowners on Weston Road between Wilson Avenue and Bradstock Road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 7, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Homes on Weston Road Between Wilson Avenue and Bradstock Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-91986.pdf

Speakers

Dong Huynh
Joyce Madore
Edgar Soares
Sunil Persad

Communications (Community Council)

(March 14, 2016) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 - York West, requesting deferral of Item EY13.8 - Homes on Weston Road between Wilson Avenue and Bradstock Road, to May 10, 2016 (EY.Main.EY14.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-59846.pdf
(May 4, 2016) Letter from Salvatore Sgro (EY.New.EY14.4.2)

4a - Homes on Weston Road between Wilson Avenue and Bradstock Road

Origin
(October 5, 2015) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 - York West
Summary

At its meeting of June 16, 2015, Etobicoke York Community Council considered Item EY7.52, headed "Homes on Weston Road between Wilson Avenue and Bradstock Avenue".  A number of homes on this portion of Weston Road had received violation notices relating to driveway widths.  The Community Council, among other things, requested staff to report on options to bring these driveways into compliance.

 

City staff have conducted a preliminary investigation of non-conforming driveways on this portion of Weston Road.  Accordingly, I would like to re-open the June 16, 2015 decision of the Community Council, and instead request City staff work to with property owners to bring these driveways into compliance.

Background Information (Community Council)
(October 5, 2015) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7, York West regarding Homes on Weston Road between Wilson Avenue and Bradstock Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-91950.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(January 15, 2016) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7, York West requesting deferral of Item EY11.20 to February 23, 2016 (EY.Main.EY14.4a.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-59861.pdf

EY14.40 - Accessible Parking Space - EYD - April 2016 (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Bill 541 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the installation of an on-street accessible parking space at the location identified in Appendix A attached to the report dated April 18, 2016, from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.

Origin

(April 18, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of an on-street accessible parking space for persons with disabilities.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject street, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 18, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding an Accessible Parking Space - EYD - April 2016 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92384.pdf

EY14.44 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
2 - Etobicoke North, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 13 - Parkdale-High Park

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following requests noting that the applicants are required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

 

a. A temporary liquor licence extension for the outdoor Walking Ring Area at Woodbine Race Track, 555 Rexdale Boulevard, for the Queen's Plate to be held on July 3, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

 

b. A temporary liquor licence extension for an outdoor event for the group Night Nation Run at Woodbine Race Track, 555 Rexdale Boulevard, to be held on July 23, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.

 

c. Temporary liquor licence extensions for the following establishments taking part in the annual Junction Summer Solstice, taking place from 12:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. on June 18, 2016,  in the Junction Business Improvement Area:

 

2840 Dundas Street West: See-Scape

2867A Dundas Street West: Hole in the Wall

2876 Dundas Street West: Indie Alehouse

2877 Dundas Street West: Rod, Gun, Barbers

2883 Dundas Street West: Playa Cabana Cantina

2885 Dundas Street West: NODO Restaurant

2907 Dundas Street West: Junction City Music Hall

2907 Dundas Street West: Silk Authentic Thai & Asian Cuisine

2952 Dundas Street West: Shamone

2998 Dundas Street West: Purple Onion

3014 Dundas Street West: Vesuivio’s Pizzeria and Spaghetti House

3047 Dundas Street West: Bricco Kitchen and Wine Bar

3048 Dundas Street West: Axis Gallery and Grill

2840 Dundas Street West: See-Scape

 

d. The Junction Night Market, organized by the Junction Farmers Market and the Four Villages Community Health Centre, to be held on July 16, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at various locations on Pacific Avenue, from Dundas Street West, north to the church at 425 Pacific Avenue, along the laneway south of the church, and in the open lot at 2960 Dundas Street West.

 

e. The 19th Annual Taste of the Kingsway Festival:

 

a. to be held on Bloor Street West, from Prince Edward Drive to Montgomery Road, on:

 

- Friday, September 9, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

- Saturday, September 10, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 

- Sunday, September 11, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 

 

b. to operate a Beer and Wine Garden on Bloor Street West, west of Prince Edward Drive; and

 

c. for temporary liquor license extensions for various Kingsway Business Improvement Area member businesses, as listed in the letter (April 1, 2016) from the Chair, Kingsway BIA, during event hours of the Taste of the Kingsway Festival.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council, under its delegated authority, declared for liquor licensing purposes, the following events to be of municipal significance, and directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised that the Community Council has no objection to their taking place:

 

1. The Inaugural Lakeshore Village Grilled Cheese Challenge to be held on Lake Shore Boulevard West from Eighth Street to Sixth Street, on June 11, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

 

2. The Junction Night Market, organized by the Junction Farmers Market and the Four Villages Community Health Centre, to be held on July 16, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at various locations on Pacific Avenue, from Dundas Street West, north to the church at 425 Pacific Avenue, along the laneway south of the church, and in the open lot at 2960 Dundas Street West.

 

3. The 19th Annual Taste of the Kingsway Festival, to be held on Bloor Street West, from Prince Edward Drive to Montgomery Road, on:

 

- September 9, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

- September 10, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 

- September 11, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 

 

4. The 13th Annual Lakeshore Mardi Gras Festival to be held at Colonel Samuel Smith Park, from July 29 to August 1, 2016.

 

5. The Franklin Horner Extravaganza to be held at the Franklin Horner Community Centre, 432 Horner Avenue on September 10, 2016.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of various events for liquor licensing purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(March 31, 2016) Letter from the Director, Racing and Gaming Hospitality, Woodbine Entertainment Group regarding the Queen's Plate event on July 3, 2016 (EY.Main.EY14.44.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60153.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from the Chair, Lakeshore Village Business Improvement Area, regarding the Grilled Cheese Challenge on June 11, 2016 (EY.Main.EY14.44.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60154.pdf
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Market Manager, Junction Farmers Market, regarding the Night Market event on July 16, 2016 (EY.Main.EY14.44.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60155.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Letter from the Executive Director, The Junction Business Improvement Area regarding The Junction Summer Solstice Festival on June 18, 2016 (EY.Main.EY14.44.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60229.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Letter from the Director, Racing and Gaming Hospitality, Woodbine Entertainment Group regarding the Night Nation Run event on July 23, 2016 (EY.Main.EY14.44.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60278.pdf
(April 1, 2016) Letter from the Chair, The Kingsway Business Improvement Area, regarding the 19th Annual Taste of the Kingsway Festival - September 9-11, 2016 (EY.New.EY14.44.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60317.pdf
(April 29, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore regarding the 13th Annual Lakeshore Mardi Gras Festival on July 29 to August 1, 2016 (EY.New.EY14.44.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60336.pdf
(April 29, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore regarding the Franklin Horner Extravaganza Event on September 10, 2016 (EY.New.EY14.44.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60337.pdf
(April 29, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore regarding the Lakeshore Village Grilled Cheese Competition on June 11, 2016 (EY.New.EY14.44.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-60338.pdf

EY14.50 - Request for Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Support for Committee of Adjustment Decision - 50 Millwick Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Solicitor, City Planning and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for Case # PL160344 to defend the Committee of Adjustment's approval of the application for 50 Millwick Drive.

Origin

(May 3, 2016) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 - York West

Summary

The owners of the land located at 50 Millwick Drive applied to the Committee of Adjustment and attended a hearing on February 23, 2016. The application (Application A23/16EYK) proposal was to legalize and to maintain a storage shed in the rear yard that is currently under construction.  The applicant's proposal was approved by the Committee of Adjustment and I submitted a letter of support that the variance was in keeping with the character of the surrounding neighbourhood. The Committee of Adjustment's decision has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (Case# PL160344 with no hearing scheduled yet).

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 3, 2016) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 - York West, regarding the Appeal of the Committee of Adjustment Decision - 50 Millwick Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92940.pdf
(February 25, 2016) Notice of Decision by the Committee of Adjustment - Etobicoke York Panel - 50 Millwick Drive.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92941.pdf

Speakers

John Quaglietta

EY14.52 - Request for Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 2 Ash Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor, City Planning, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 2 Ash Crescent to support the Committee of Adjustment’s refusal of the requested variances and defend Planning staff's recommendation for the refusal of the consent application at 2 Ash Crescent.

Origin

(May 10, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Summary

The owners of the land municipally known as 2 Ash Crescent applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent to sever (Application B75/15EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A667/15EYK, A668/15EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings, one with an attached garage and one with a detached garage in the rear yard.

 

City Planning staff prepared a report recommending refusal of the consent, and the local community and I submitted concerns that the consent and minor variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-laws, nor the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood.

 

On April 14th, 2016, the Committee approved the consent and the variances related to the severance (lot frontage and lot area), however, refused the variances related to the construction of the new dwellings.  In essence, the applicant would have to construct two new dwellings within full compliance of the zoning by-laws.

 

The COA’s decision has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.  To-date, a hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 10, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore - Request for Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 2 Ash Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-92981.pdf
(April 14, 2016) Notice of Decision by the Committee of Adjustment - Etobicoke York Panel - 2 Ash Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-93041.pdf

EY14.53 - Enforcement Issues - Marijuana Dispensaries

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 17 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Toronto Police Services, Divisions 11, 12 and 13, in co-operation with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to proceed with the enforcement of all laws relating to marijuana-related retail businesses in Wards 5, 6, 11, 12, 13 and 17.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council:

 

1.  Directed the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to consult with the Ward Councillors for Wards 5, 6, 11, 12, 13 and 17, and to inspect marijuana dispensaries, including those operating at 1346 St. Clair Avenue and 1715 St. Clair Avenue West, and take all enforcement action as deemed appropriate.

Origin

(May 10, 2016) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio, Ward 17 - Davenport

Summary

As a result of the Federal Liberal government promising to legalize marijuana, the City of Toronto has seen a rash of marijuana dispensaries/pharmacies opening their doors for business. These establishments are opening at an alarming rate across the City of Toronto, without a legal license to operate. 

 

Health Canada has authorized 27 licensed producers across Canada with just 15 of them operating in Ontario. These licensed establishments are allowed to sell/dispense marijuana to those with verified prescriptions. According to Health Canada, Toronto Police and City of Toronto, all other establishments are operating illegally.

 

As of April, two locations are operating within Ward 17, 1326 St. Clair Avenue West and 1715 St. Clair Avenue West. These two properties are subjected to the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 only; not to the new City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013. Under the Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, these properties are zoned MCR whereby a marijuana dispensary is not a permitted use.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 10, 2016) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio, Ward 17 - Davenport regarding Marijuana Dispensaries
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-93005.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 14

NY14.9 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 11 Brooke Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Communications NY14.9.4 and NY14.9.5 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 11 Brooke Avenue.

Origin

(April 19, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 11 Brooke Avenue. The application indicates the reasons for removal are due to concerns over injury that was sustained due to falling walnuts, staining of the patio deck and outdoor furniture, the resulting restricted use of the patio deck and backyard, and heaving of stones around the base of the tree.

 

The subject tree is a black walnut (Juglans nigra) tree measuring 61 cm in diameter. Urban Forestry does not support removal of the tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 19, 2016) Report from Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on an Application to Remove a Private Tree at 11 Brooke Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92225.pdf
Attachment 1 - Photograph of the 61 cm black walnut tree in the rear yard of 11 Brooke Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92226.pdf
Attachment 2 - Photograph depicting minor heaving of stone base
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92227.pdf
Attachment 3 - Photograph depicting proximity to patio deck
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92228.pdf

Speakers

Sandra Avey

Communications (Community Council)

(April 27, 2016) E-mail from Harold B. Smith (NY.New.NY14.9.1)
(April 27, 2016) E-mail from Arlena Hebert (NY.New.NY14.9.2)
(May 10, 2016) Submission from Don Gauthier, President Trade Winds Tree Care, submitted by Sandra Avey (NY.New.NY14.9.3)

Communications (City Council)

(May 31, 2016) Letter from Arlene Hebert, President, Lytton Park Residents' Organization Inc. (CC.New.NY14.9.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61149.pdf
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Sheila Dunlop, Secretary, South Armour Heights Residents' Association (CC.New.NY14.9.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61150.pdf

NY14.21 - Assumption of Services - Tribute Communities (York North) Inc. Plan 66M-2439 - Subdivision File - 05 132092 NNY 08 SB - 4700 Keele Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council assume the services installed within the Plan of  Subdivision and that the City formally assume the roads within the Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2439.

 

2. City Council authorize the Director, Engineering Review, to release the performance guarantee held with respect to the municipal services in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement.

 

3. City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Registered Subdivision Plan 66M-2439.

 

4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

 

5. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

 

6. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed with Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2439 to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(April 12, 2016) Report from the Director, Engineering Review

Summary

This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the municipal roads and services within the Plan of Subdivision, in accordance with the terms of the Subdivision Agreement for Plan 66M-2439, registered on July 11, 2007 between Tribute Communities (York North) Inc. and the City of Toronto.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 12, 2016) Report from the Director, Engineering Review on Assumption of Services - Tribute Communities (York North) Inc. - Plan 66M-2439 - Subdivision File 05 132092 NNY 08 SB - 4700 Keele Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92088.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map of Plan of Subdivision 66M-2439
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92089.pdf

NY14.22 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
8 - York West, 10 - York Centre, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 23 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that: 

 

1. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following request noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

 

a. Temporary Liquor Licence extension from Marigolds and Onions, for the proposed extended outdoor fenced-in area that surrounds the licensed areas for the Rogers Cup to be held at the Rexall Centre, 1 Shoreham Drive from Saturday, July 23, to Sunday, July 31, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. daily.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council, for liquor licensing purposes, declared the following to be events of municipal significance: 

 

1. The "Taste of Manila" Street Festival, to be held on Saturday, August 20, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Sunday, August 21, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at the Bathurst Street corner, from Wilson Avenue up to Laurelcrest Street.

 

2. The 15th Annual "Korean Harvest Festival" also known as the "Harvest Moon Festival", to be held on Friday, August 26, 2016 from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., Saturday, August 27, 2016, from 11:30 a.m. to 10:30 p.m. and Sunday, August 28, 2016 from 11:30 a.m. to 10:30 p.m. at Mel Lastman Square.

 

3. Nordstrom Canada Gala Store Opening, on Wednesday, October 19, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at Yorkdale Shopping Centre, 3401 Dufferin Street. 

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events for Municipal Significance for liquor licensing purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(March 15, 2016) Letter from Rolando Mangante, Chairman, Philippine Cultural Community Centre, requesting that the "Taste of Manila" Street Festival, to be held on Saturday, August 20, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and Sunday, August 21, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Bathurst Street corner Wilson Avenue up to Laurelcrest Street on Bathurst, be declared an event of municipal significance. (NY.Main.14.22.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/comm/communicationfile-60235.pdf
(March 28, 2016) Letter from Christine Moon, Korean Canadian Business Association of North Toronto, requesting that the 15th Annual "Korean Harvest Festival" also known as the "Harvest Moon Festival", to be held on Friday, August 26, 2016 from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., Saturday, August 27, 2016, from 11:30 a.m. to 10:30 p.m. and Sunday, August 28, 2016 from 11:30 a.m. to 10:30 p.m. at Mel Lastman Square, be declared an event of municipal significance. (NY.Main.NY14.22.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/comm/communicationfile-60276.pdf
(April 19, 2016) E-mail from Inoka Dias, Special Events Project Manager, Marigolds and Onions, on behalf of Tennis Canada, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for the proposed extended outdoor fenced-in area that surrounds the licensed areas for the Rogers Cup to be held at the Rexall Centre, 1 Shoreham Drive from Saturday, July 23, to Sunday, July 31, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. daily. (NY.Main.NY14.22.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/comm/communicationfile-59947.pdf
(April 22, 2016) Letter from Russell Day, Vice President, Sales, Daniel et Daniel Catering and Events, requesting that North York Community Council declare the Nordstrom Canada Gala Store Opening, on Wednesday, October 19, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at Yorkdale Shopping Centre, 3401 Dufferin Street, to be an event of municipal significance. (NY.Main.NY14.22.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/comm/communicationfile-60231.pdf

NY14.27 - Final Report - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application - 263 Finch Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 7625, for the lands at 263 Finch Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (April 21, 2016), from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to obtain Notice of Approval Conditions under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, North York District, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on May 10, 2016.

Origin

(April 21, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 to permit a medical office in the existing single detached dwelling at 263 Finch Avenue West. A total of five parking spaces are proposed at the rear of the site. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. The proposed professional medical office use is consistent with both the Mixed Use Areas designation of the Official Plan and the policies for Mixed Use Area “B” in the Central Finch Area Secondary Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 21, 2016) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 263 Finch Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92436.pdf

NY14.28 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 740 and 750 York Mills Road and 17 Farmstead Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
The General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY14.28a with recommendations)

Communication NY14.28.16 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that: 

 

1. City Council refuse the zoning by-law amendment application for 740 and 750 York Mills Road and 17 Farmstead Road for the following reasons:

 

a. over-intensification of the site;

 

b. a loss of green space and mature trees;

 

c. increase in traffic; and

 

d. any other valid planning reasons.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council: 

 

1. Directed the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Chief Planner, to report to City Council for its meeting on June 7, 2016, on the feasibiltity of requesting an on-site parkland dedication adjacent to Mossgrove Park and the corresponding density decrease required to implement a parkland dedication on the subject lands.

 

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application is to amend former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 and City of Toronto Zoning By-law 560-2013 to permit the infill addition of 260 new apartment units in a stacked townhouse form, 3 and 4 storeys in height, on underutilized space on an existing apartment building site.  The proposed new gross floor area for the site would be 27,756 m2.  The three existing 18 storey rental apartment buildings with 409 rental units would be maintained.  The overall total gross floor area of the existing and proposed development would be 77,004 m2 resulting in a density of 2.47 FSI with a total of 669 dwelling units.  A total of 775 parking spaces would serve the entire site with access provided from York Mills Road and Farmstead Road.

 

The proposed development is appropriate as it provides for sensitive and compatible infill development on a site containing existing apartment buildings with sufficient underutilized space to accommodate development.  In addition, the proposal provides for new and consolidates existing amenity space, screens garbage and loading areas, introduces pedestrian mews, and provides for a more efficient internal driveway network eliminating multiple access points along Farmstead Road. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 22, 2016) Final Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 740 and 750 York Mills Road and 17 Farmstead Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92526.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(May 31, 2016) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Parkland Dedication Adjacent to Mossgrove Park (740 and 750 York Mills Road and 17 Farmstead Road Zoning By-law Amendment Application) (NY14.28a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93853.pdf

Speakers

Andrew Ferancik, on behalf of the applicant
Robert Smythe, York Mills-Leslie Residents Association Inc. (Submission Filed)
Peter Arrowsmith, York Mills-Leslie Residents Association Inc. (Submission Filed)
Tom Weinberger (Submission Filed)
Helen Sugar (Submission Filed)
Terence West, Don Mills Residents Incorporated
Karen Krakower

Communications (Community Council)

(April 18, 2016) E-mail from Ilan (NY.Main.NY14.28.1)
(April 19, 2016) E-mail from Ellen Erenberg (NY.Main.NY14.28.2)
(April 25, 2016) Letter from Dorothy B. Wagner (NY.New.NY14.28.3)
(May 3, 2016) E-mail from Margaret Fodor (NY.New.NY14.28.4)
(May 10, 2016) Submission from Dr. Tom Weinberger (NY.New.NY14.28.5)
(May 8, 2016) E-mail from John and Luisa O'Gay (NY.New.NY14.28.6)
(May 10, 2016) Submission from Peter Arrowsmith, submitted by Robert Smythe (NY.New.NY14.28.7)
(May 10, 2016) Submission from Helen Sugar, submitted by Robert Smythe (NY.New.NY14.28.8)
(May 10, 2016) Submission from Robert Smythe (NY.New.NY14.28.9)
(May 10, 2016) Submission from Tom Weinberger, submitted by Robert Smythe (NY.New.NY14.28.10)
(May 4, 2016) Letter from Cathryn Sewell (NY.New.NY14.28.11)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Adam Bryk (NY.New.NY14.28.12)
(May 10, 2016) E-mail from Robert Sprachman (NY.New.NY14.28.13)
(May 10, 2016) Letter from Dr. T. Weinberger (NY.New.NY14.28.14)
(May 10, 2016) Letter from Dr. Tom Weinberger, York Mills-Leslie Residents Association Inc., submitting petitions containing 1625 signatures of area residents, in opposition to the proposed development (NY.New.NY14.28.15)

Communications (City Council)

(May 25, 2016) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Barristers and Solicitors (CC.Main.NY14.28.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61057.pdf

NY14.29 - Refusal Report - Official Plan Amendment Application - 3140 - 3170 Dufferin Street and 60 - 68 Apex Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council refuse the application to amend the Official Plan at 3140-3170 Dufferin Street for the following reasons:

 

a. the proposal does not conform to the City's Official Plan;

 

b. the proposal does not implement the City's recently-completed Dufferin Street Secondary Plan; and

 

c. the proposal is inappropriate and does not represent good planning.

 

2. Should the application be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of Council's refusal of the Official Plan amendment.

 

3. Should the application be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, City Council direct the City Solicitor to consolidate the appeal with the applicant's appeal of the Dufferin Street Secondary Plan.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan at 3140-3170 Dufferin Street and 60-68 Apex Road to permit two mixed-use buildings of 28 and 22 storeys separated by a new public road oriented in a north to south configuration. The overall development would have a gross floor area of approximately 59,400 square metres and a Floor Space Index (FSI) of 3.86. There would be 578 residential units, 878 parking spaces and 1135 bicycle parking spaces. A new 1900 square metre public park is also proposed.

 

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan as it is inconsistent with the recently-adopted Dufferin Street Secondary Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 20, 2016) Refusal Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on an Official Plan Amendment Application for 3140 - 3170 Dufferin Street and 60 - 68 Apex Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92527.pdf

Speakers

Anne Benedetti, Goodmans LLP

NY14.30 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 15 Mallow Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
34 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing to oppose the zoning by-law amendment application in its current form.

 

2. Should the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) approve the applications, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the OMB withholds its Order(s) approving the application until such time as the Board has been advised by the City Solicitor that:

 

a. the proposed zoning by-law amendment is in a form satisfactory to the City;

 

b. the applicant has submitted an application for Site Plan Control for the townhouse portion of the proposed development and all pre-approval conditions have been met; and

 

c. the applicant has submitted an application for Subdivision and draft plan approval has been given.

 

3. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request formal mediation at the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff  to continue discussions with the applicant to address the issues outlined in the report (April 20, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and to report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A hearing has been scheduled for July 20 to 22, 2016.

 

This application is to amend the North York Zoning By-law for a portion of the lands at 15 Mallow Road to permit 39 new dwelling units comprised of 10 townhouses, 16 semi-detached and 13 detached dwellings and a new public road.

 

This report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, attend the OMB hearing in opposition to the current proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 20, 2016) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 15 Mallow Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-92492.pdf

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 14

SC14.3 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1510 Birchmount Road; 115 Commander Boulevard; 161 Commander Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
37 - Scarborough Centre, 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1510 Birchmount Road; 115 Commander Boulevard; 161 Commander Boulevard.
 
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(March 21, 2016) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 21, 2016) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1510 Birchmount Road; 115 Commander Boulevard; 161 Commander Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-91631.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft By-law - Amendment of Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1510 Birchmount Road, 115 Commander Boulevard; 161 Commander Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-91632.pdf

SC14.4 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 185 Bonis Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
40 - Scarborough Agincourt

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below be designated as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes – 185 Bonis Avenue.

 

2.   City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 185 Bonis Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92204.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft By-law - Amendment of Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 185 Bonis Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92205.pdf

SC14.5 - 50 Hart Avenue - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 50 Hart Avenue.

Origin

(April 18, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 50 Hart Avenue. The application indicates the reason for removal is that the owner finds the tree too costly to maintain, the tree roots are lifting a shed, and the surface roots are a tripping hazard.


The subject tree is silver maple tree (Acer saccharinum), measuring 64 cm in diameter.  Urban Forestry does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 18, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 50 Hart Avenue - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92198.pdf

SC14.6 - 34 Oakridge Drive - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 34 Oakridge Drive. 

Origin

(April 18, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 34 Oakridge Drive. The application indicates the reason for removal is that the tree is too close to the driveway, leading to tree resin falling onto the owner's vehicles and causing damage to the paint.


The subject tree is a Norway spruce tree (Picea abies), measuring 35 cm in diameter.  Urban Forestry does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 18, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 34 Oakridge Drive - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92178.pdf

SC14.7 - 14 Queensgrove Road - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 14 Queensgrove Road.

Origin

(April 19, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 14 Queensgrove Road. The application indicates that reasons for removal are because the tree is in decline, falling branches are a hazard and that the owner finds the maintenance of the tree too onerous.


The subject tree is a white spruce tree (Picea glauca), measuring 59 cm in diameter.  Urban Forestry does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 19, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 14 Queensgrove Road - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92199.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(April 30, 2016) E-mail from James Lockyear (SC.New.SC14.7.1)

SC14.8 - 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council deny the request for a permit to remove three (3) privately-owned trees located at 36 Ivan Road.

Origin

(April 18, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove three (3) privately-owned trees located at 36 Ivan Road. The application indicates the main reason for tree removal is due to the location of a proposed new house and subsequent purported damage to or significant loss of roots involved in the excavation for the foundation. The presence of cytospora cankers on the trees, leading to slow decline, is also stated as a reason.


The subject trees are all Norway spruce (Picea abies) trees measuring 38 cm, 40 cm and 47 cm in diameter. Urban Forestry does not support the removal of these trees as they are healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 18, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 36 Ivan Road - Application to Remove Three Private Trees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92177.pdf

Speakers

Peter Tzouras, Owner
Andrew Simms

SC14.12 - Proposed Bicycle Exemption - Victoria Park Avenue at Sweeney Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
34 - Don Valley East, 37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Bill 558 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council exempt bicycles from the existing southbound right-turn prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, buses excepted, on Victoria Park Avenue at Sweeney Drive.

Origin

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report recommends an amendment of the existing by-law to exempt bicycles from the current southbound right-turn prohibition on Victoria Park Avenue at Sweeney Drive, in order to allow cyclist access to Sweeney Drive.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Proposed Bicycle Exemption - Victoria Park Avenue at Sweeney Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92311.pdf
Location Plan - Victoria Park Avenue at Sweeney Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92312.pdf

SC14.13 - Traffic Control Signals - 3030 Birchmount Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
39 - Scarborough-Agincourt

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals on Birchmount Road at a point approximately 255 metres north of the intersection of Birchmount Road and L'Amoreaux Drive/Silver Springs Boulevard.


2.   City Council authorize the removal of the pedestrian refuge island on Birchmount Road, approximately 190 metres north of the intersection of Birchmount Road and L'Amoreaux Drive/Silver Springs Boulevard, in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals at the location approximately 65 metres further north.

 

3.   City Council not authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Birchmount Road and Brookmill Boulevard.

Origin

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

A pedestrian refuge island is currently located at 3030 Birchmount Road in front of the entrance to the Scarborough Hospital Birchmount Campus, approximately 190 metres north of the intersection with L'Amoreaux Drive/Silver Springs Boulevard.  This report recommends the replacement of this pedestrian refuge island with full traffic control signals at the driveway access to the hospital, located approximately 65 metres further north.

 

These recommended traffic control signals will provide a safe and convenient crossing of Birchmount Road for pedestrians, including TTC passengers using the northbound Birchmount Route 17 service, and would be made fully accessible through the installation of APS ("accessible pedestrian signals"), whereas the current pedestrian refuge island is not.  The volume of these pedestrian crossings is expected to increase with the proposed construction of a sidewalk on the east side of this section of Birchmount Road programmed in 2017.  The traffic control signals would also provide safer and more convenient service for motorists and emergency vehicles accessing/egressing the hospital parking lot and passenger pick-up/drop-off facilities.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Traffic Control Signals - 3030 Birchmount Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92270.pdf
Location Plan - 3030 Birchmount Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92271.pdf

SC14.14 - Left-Turn Prohibitions - 3200 Kennedy Road and 2000 McNicoll Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
39 - Scarborough-Agincourt
Attention
Bill 554 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council prohibit eastbound left-turns from 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, buses excepted, from the private access located approximately 135 metres north of McNicoll Avenue to Kennedy Road.
  
2.   City Council prohibit southbound left-turns from the private access located approximately 200 metres west of Kennedy Road to McNicoll Avenue.

Origin

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report recommends that eastbound exiting left turns (buses excepted) from the access at 3200 Kennedy Road and southbound exiting left turns from the access at 2000 McNicoll Avenue be prohibited, between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday.  Currently, there are no prohibitions at these two accesses.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Left-Turn Prohibitions - 3200 Kennedy Road and 2000 McNicoll Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92275.pdf
Location Plan - 3200 Kennedy Road and 2000 McNicoll Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92276.pdf

SC14.15 - U-Turn Prohibition - Brimley Road and Grittani Lane (North Intersection)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
41 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bill 559 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council prohibit northbound U-turn movements on Brimley Road at Grittani Lane (north intersection).

Origin

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report recommends that a northbound U-Turn prohibition be enacted at the intersection of Brimley Road at Grittani Lane (north intersection) in order to mitigate potentially unsafe U-turns that can be made at this location.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - U-Turn Prohibition - Brimley Road and Grittani Lane (North Intersection)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92300.pdf
Location Plan - Brimley Road and Grittani Lane (North Intersection)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92301.pdf

SC14.22 - 270-280 McLevin Avenue - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bill 549 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 270‑280 McLevin Avenue, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1, to the report dated April 19, 2016 to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2.  City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

3.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By‑law on title.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Origin

(April 19, 2016) Report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application requests an exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act for the lands located at 270-280 McLevin Avenue, to allow for the division of land to create separately conveyable parcels for 6 townhouse dwelling units currently under construction.

 

The proposal complies with the Official Plan and Zoning by-law. The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 19, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 270-280 McLevin Avenue - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92454.pdf

SC14.23 - 5131 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning By-law Amendment - Removal of the Holding Provision (H) - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bill 529 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 14402 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report dated April 5, 2016, from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.


2.   City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Origin

(April 5, 2016) Report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes the removal of the Holding Provision (H) for the lands at 5131 Sheppard Avenue East to permit the redevelopment of the lands.

 

Exception No. 4 of Schedule C to the Malvern Community Zoning By-law No.14402 provides that the 'H' shall be removed at such a time as a conceptual site plan, and servicing and transportation issues have been satisfactorily addressed to accommodate the proposed development, in respect to transportation matters.  These conditions have now been satisfied.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law by removing the holding symbol from the subject lands.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 5, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 5131 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning By-law Amendment - Removal of the Holding Provision (H) - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92452.pdf

SC14.24 - 2967 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
40 - Scarborough Agincourt

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Sullivan Community Zoning By-law No. 10717, as amended (former City of Scarborough), for the lands at 2967 Sheppard Avenue East, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to report dated April 21, 2016.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the applicant to enter into an amending Site Plan Agreement under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(April 21, 2016) Report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to permit the permanent use of an existing, former single detached residential dwelling at 2967 Sheppard Avenue East as a physiotherapy clinic and associated office uses. These uses were previously permitted for a temporary, three year period only. The site was previously altered to provide ten on-site parking spaces.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law on a permanent basis provided adequate landscaping and/or fencing is provided to effectively screen the expanded parking area from abutting residential properties to the south on Foxhill Road.  These improvements will be secured through the related site plan approvals process.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 21, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 2967 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92297.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 2967 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92324.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(April 21, 2016) Letter from John Egan (SC.Main.SC14.24.1)

SC14.25 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
36 - Scarborough Southwest, 44 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council, for liquor licensing purposes, advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests, noting that the applicant is required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:
 

a.  Allow for an outside beer garden for the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 258 Highland Creek Annual Canada Day Event, to be held on Friday, July 1, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 258, 45 Lawson Road, Scarborough District.
 
b. Canada Day community/veterans event, to be held on Friday, July 1, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 13, 1577 Kingston Road.

  
c. Warriors Day community/veterans event, to be held on Saturday, August 20, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 13, 1577 Kingston Road. 


d. Labour Day community/veterans event, to be held on Monday, September 5, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 13, 1577 Kingston Road. 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council declared, under its delegated authority, the following to be events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes:

 

a.  Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 258 Highland Creek Annual Canada Day Event, to be held on Friday, July 1, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 258, 45 Lawson Road, Scarborough District;

 

b.  the 9th Annual Port Union Waterfront Festival, to be held on Saturday, June 25, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., at the Port Union Village Common, located at the foot of Port Union Road, south of Lawrence Avenue East in Scarborough.

 

c.  Canada Day community/veterans event, to be held on Friday, July 1, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion Branch 13, 1577 Kingston Road;

 

d.  Warriors Day community/veterans event, to be held on Saturday, August 20, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 13, 1577 Kingston Road; and

 

e. Labour Day community/veterans event, to be held on Monday, September 5, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 13, 1577 Kingston Road.

Summary

Seeking Endorsement of events for Liquor Licensing Purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(April 26, 2016) Letter from Councillor Ron Moeser, Ward 44, Scarborough East, regarding The Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 258, Annual Canada Day Event, to be held on Friday, July 1, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion Branch 258, 45 Lawson Road, Scarborough District. (SC.New.SC14.25.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/comm/communicationfile-60339.pdf
(April 27, 2016) Letter from Councillor Ron Moeser, Ward 44, Scarborough East, regarding the 9th Annual Port Union Waterfront Festival, to be held on Saturday, June 25, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., at the Port Union Village Common, located at the foot of Port Union Road, south of Lawrence Avenue East in Scarborough. (SC.New.SC14.25.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/comm/communicationfile-60294.pdf
(May 10, 2016) Letter from Councillor Gary Crawford, Ward 36, Scarborough Southwest, regarding Canada Day community/veterans events to be held on Friday, July 1, 2016, Warriors Day community/veterans events to be held on Saturday, August 20, 2016 and Labour Day community/veterans events to be held on Monday, September 5, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 13, 1577 Kingston Road, Scarborough. (SC.New.SC14.25.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/comm/communicationfile-60340.pdf

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 16

TE16.3 - Final Report - 178R Ossington Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 178R Ossington Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 178R Ossington Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 178R Ossington Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment (and/or) draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

5.  Prior to introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner be required to submit a revised Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws at 178R Ossington Avenue to permit the additional uses of office, custom workshop, bake shop, performing arts studio, artist/photographer's studio, art gallery, restaurant, and caterer's shop within the existing 2-storey building which was formerly an industrial baking operation.  Three parking spaces, two loading spaces and a total of 11 bicycle parking spaces are proposed to be provided at-grade with access from Foxley Place.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 569-2013.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 22, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 178R Ossington Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92517.pdf

TE16.4 - Final Report - Lower Yonge Precinct - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Precinct Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communications TE16.4.6 to TE16.4.8 have been submitted on this item

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to authorize the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan (adopted by City Council in 2003) to be brought into force and effect for those lands within the Lower Yonge Precinct, identified on Map J1 within the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board amend the former City of Toronto Official Plan and Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with Schedule 1 of the draft Official Plan Amendment attached to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District amended by adding the words "in particular, improvements to the Jack Layton Ferry Terminal" to part f) in Section 7.1.6 so that part f) now reads:

 

f)  parkland improvements in the vicinity of the Lower Yonge Precinct, in particular, improvements to the Jack Layton Ferry Terminal.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

 

4.  City Council endorse the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan, dated April 2016, attached as Attachment 6 to the report (April 15, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

5.  City Council direct staff to confirm with the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change that the lands within the Lower Yonge Precinct, identified on Map J1 within the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, should be classified as a Class 4 area under Ministry of Environment (now Ministry of Environment and Climate Change) Environmental Noise Guideline, Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning, Publication NPC-300, August 2013.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present the findings of the second and final phase of the Lower Yonge Precinct planning process.  The report recommends an area-specific amendment to the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, as well as the endorsement of the Lower Yonge Precinct Plan.  This planning process was initiated to establish a planning framework for new development within this nine hectare area that capitalizes on its exceptional location and historical attributes.  The proposed framework seeks to foster the development of a vibrant new, mixed-use community within the heart of the City's emerging Central Waterfront.  It is anticipated to be a high-density, sustainable neighbourhood with an animated public realm, large central park, well-designed buildings, range of housing options and commensurate community services and facilities.

 

Some of the key features contemplated for the Lower Yonge Precinct include: 13 towers; approximately 28,000 new residents and employees; a new community recreation centre; an elementary school; two child care facilities; affordable housing units; modifications to the Gardiner Expressway; a tunnel connection under the rail corridor; two new streets, enhanced cycling infrastructure and an extension of the PATH network.


The planning tools contained herein will facilitate the evaluation of subsequent planning applications in the Lower Yonge Precinct and will help to ensure that with the anticipated densities, appropriate infrastructure must be provided.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 22, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Lower Yonge Precinct - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Precinct Plan - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92511.pdf
Attachment 6 - Part 1 - Lower Yonge Precinct - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Precinct Plan - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92733.pdf
Attachment 6 - Part 2 - Lower Yonge Precinct - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Precinct Plan - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92734.pdf
Attachment 6 - Part 3 - Lower Yonge Precinct - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Precinct Plan - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92735.pdf

Speakers

Julie Beddoes, West Don Lands Committee
Laurie McPherson, Bousfields Inc.
Barnet Kussner, WeirFoulds LLP
Nancy Patterson
Marie Kelsie
Stig Harvor
Kevin Vuong, Chair, Southcore Community Association
Patrick Devine, Devine Park LLP
Louise Tinker, Planner, Bousfields Inc.

Communications (Community Council)

(April 22, 2016) E-mail from Ed Hore (TE.Main.TE16.4.1)
(May 3, 2016) Letter from Joel D. Farber, Fogler, Rubinoff LLP, on behalf of Torstar Corporation (TE.Supp.TE16.4.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60485.pdf
(May 6, 2016) Letter from Kevin Vuong, Chair, Southcore Community Association (TE.Supp.TE16.4.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60487.pdf
(May 6, 2016) Letter from Jonathan Rodger, Zelinka Priamo Limited, consultants for CP REIT Ontario Properties Limited and Loblaw Properties Limited (TE.Supp.TE16.4.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60488.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Suzanne Kavanagh, President, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (TE.Supp.TE16.4.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60544.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 1, 2016) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors (CC.Supp.TE16.4.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61116.pdf
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Mark R. Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP (CC.New.TE16.4.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61140.pdf
(June 7, 2016) Letter from Cynthia A. MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP (CC.New.TE16.4.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61152.pdf

TE16.5 - Final Report - Broadview Avenue Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment, Urban Design Guidelines and Heritage Inventory

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE16.5a with recommendations).

Communications TE16.5.27 to TE16.5.30 have been submitted on this Item

Bill 551 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands fronting on Broadview Avenue between Danforth Avenue and O'Connor Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with Attachment 7 amended by:

 

a. deleting the word "southeast" in policy 2 to OPA 343 and replacing it with the word "southwest" so that it reads as follows:

 

"2.  Amendment to redesignate the City-owned property on the southwest corner of Broadview Avenue and Gamble Avenue from Neighbourhoods to Parks and Open Space Areas - Parks."; and

 

b.  correcting Map 1 so that the properties at 1123-1129 Broadview Avenue are excluded from Character Area E and form part of Character Area D instead.

 

2. City Council adopt the Urban Design Guidelines, subject to any stylistic or technical changes, attached as Attachment 8 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with Attachment 8 amended to identify the existing boundaries by related addresses of each Character Area as follows:

 

Area A

80 Danforth Avenue, 778 to 958 Broadview Avenue

90 Danforth Avenue, 769 to 883 Broadview Avenue

 

Area B

885 to 1007 Broadview Avenue

 

Area C

958 Broadview Avenue to and including the Charles Sauriol Parkette

 

Area D

1015 to 1129 Broadview Avenue

 

Area E

1102 to 1276 Broadview Avenue

1135 to 1277 Broadview Avenue

87 Don Valley Drive

1 Fernwood Gardens

2 Gamble Avenue.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

  

4. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Toronto Preservation Board and Toronto and East York Community Council by the end of 2016 on the heritage potential properties identified for inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in Urban Design Guidelines attached to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

5. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake a review of the potential to implement pedestrian crossing pavement lines on the north leg of the signalized intersection of Broadview Avenue and Chester Hill Road, in addition to the existing pedestrian crossing pavement lines on the south leg, and report to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the fourth quarter of 2016.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

In November 2013, City Council directed the City Planning Division to commence a study on Broadview Avenue, between Danforth Avenue and O’Connor Drive in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the local community.  This report summarizes the outcome of the Broadview Avenue Planning Study; provides an Official Plan Amendment (OPA) via a Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) to guide development in the study area and brings forward recommended area-specific Urban Design Guidelines.

 

The recommended OPA and Urban Design Guidelines provide for the following:

 

-  protect views to the Don Valley and redesignates Gamble Parkette;

 

-  define the existing character elements of the street that should be reinforced and enhanced, along with direction for areas of the street that can accommodate change;

 

-  links between Toronto's indigenous history and early industrial era with Broadview Avenue and the Don Valley;


-  recognize the diverse character of the street and the existing permissions while providing emphasis on the retail/commercial character, mitigating transportation impacts of new development and transition of new development to adjacent residential areas;

 

-  a maximum recommended mid rise building height of 20 metres (six storeys).  A variety of streetwall heights ranging from 14 to 16 metres with appropriate stepbacks are also recommended; and

 

-  the identification of properties with historic attributes and the inclusion of these properties in the City of Toronto Heritage Register.

 

It is estimated that approximately 500 new residential units will be introduced in the study area over a period of 10 to 20 years.  New tall buildings are not envisioned in the Policy Area. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 22, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Broadview Avenue Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment, Urban Design Guidelines and Heritage Inventory - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92476.pdf
Attachment 8 - Part 1 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Broadview Avenue Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment, Urban Design Guidelines and Heritage Inventory - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92729.pdf
Attachment 8 - Part 2 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Broadview Avenue Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment, Urban Design Guidelines and Heritage Inventory - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92732.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(June 1, 2016) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Broadview Avenue Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment, Urban Design Guidelines and Heritage Inventory (TE16.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93957.pdf
Attachment Part 1 - Updated Broadview Avenue Urban Design Guidelines - June 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93959.pdf
Attachment Part 2 - Updated Broadview Avenue Urban Design Guidelines - June 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93980.pdf

Speakers

Chris Williams
David Frisch
Magda Wesolkowska, Helliwell Place Residents' Association

Communications (Community Council)

(April 20, 2016) E-mail from Donna Spreitzer (TE.Main.TE16.5.1)
(May 2, 2016) Letter from Anne Ellis (TE.Supp.TE16.5.2)
(May 5, 2016) Letter from Stephen Ginsberg (TE.Supp.TE16.5.3)
(May 5, 2016) Letter from Sasha Lauzon, Bousfields Inc., consultants for Sobeys Development Limited Partnership and Hanard Investments Limited (TE.Supp.TE16.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60491.pdf
(May 5, 2016) Letter from Sasha Lauzon, Bousfields Incorporated, consultants for Sobeys Developments Limited Partnership (TE.Supp.TE16.5.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60492.pdf
(May 6, 2016) E-mail from David Frisch (TE.Supp.TE16.5.6)
(May 8, 2016) E-mail from Nick Tunnacliffe (TE.Supp.TE16.5.7)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from John Purins (TE.Supp.TE16.5.8)
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Mark R. Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP, on behalf of Gordian Foods Limited (TE.Supp.TE16.5.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60496.pdf
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Jan McNab (TE.Supp.TE16.5.10)
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Liz Lundell (TE.Supp.TE16.5.11)
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Joseph Debono, Dentons Canada LLP, on behalf of The Governing Council of The Salvation Army in Canada (TE.Supp.TE16.5.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60474.pdf
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Peter Stafford and Wayne Gibson (TE.Supp.TE16.5.13)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Todd Gates and Cathi Gibson-Gates (TE.Supp.TE16.5.14)
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Executive Team, Helliwell Place Residents' Association (TE.Supp.TE16.5.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60513.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Emil Mihaylov (TE.Supp.TE16.5.16)
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfields Incorporated, consultants to the Estonian House and the Alterra Development Group (TE.Supp.TE16.5.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60515.pdf
(May 10, 2016) Letter from David Andrew Nicholson, President, Playter Area Residents Association (TE.Supp.TE16.5.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60529.pdf
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Federick Koenig (TE.Supp.TE16.5.19)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Mary McKeen (TE.Supp.TE16.5.20)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Karen Park (TE.Supp.TE16.5.21)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Betty Quan (TE.Supp.TE16.5.22)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Ellen Simmons (TE.Supp.TE16.5.23)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Evelyn Crees (TE.Supp.TE16.5.24)
(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Rob Corcoran (TE.Supp.TE16.5.25)
(May 10, 2016) E-mail from Ian Scott (TE.Supp.TE16.5.26)

Communications (City Council)

(June 6, 2016) E-mail from Phillip Silver (CC.Supp.TE16.5.27)
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Peter Haidelmayer, Todd Ross and Magda Wesolkowska, Executive Team, Helliwell Place Residents' Association (CC.New.TE16.5.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61161.pdf
(June 6, 2016) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP (CC.New.TE16.5.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61159.pdf
(June 7, 2016) Letter from David Andrew Nichelson, President, Playter Area Residents' Association (CC.New.TE16.5.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61151.pdf

TE16.6 - Final Report - 1131 Eastern Avenue - Official Plan Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Bill 570 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council determine that no additional community consultation is required apart from the statutory public meeting due to the technical nature of this amendment.

 

2.  City Council amend the Official Plan to add that part of 1131 Eastern Avenue known as Part 1 on Reference Plan 63R-4894 to the list of properties in Site and Area Specific Policy No. 265 substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to the report (April 12, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(April 12, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes an Official Plan Amendment for part of 1131 Eastern Avenue to allow for a lease renewal by Enbridge Gas Distribution on a 40.94 square metre portion of the lands from the City of Toronto to allow an existing natural gas regulator to continue to operate at this location.

 

An Official Plan Amendment is required because the property is located in the Green Space System and is designated as Parks and Open Space Areas under the Toronto Official Plan.  The sale or disposal of City owned lands in the Green Space System and Parks and Open Space Areas is prohibited by Official Plan policies.  The extension of a lease that exceeds a period of 21 years is a form of disposition that is not permitted.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan for the purpose stated.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 12, 2016) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1131 Eastern Avenue - Official Plan Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92090.pdf

TE16.7 - Final Report - 1327, 1329, 1333, 1335, 1337 and 1339 Queen Street East - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:


1.  City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the demolition of the 5 residential rental dwelling units at 1333, 1335, 1337 and 1339 Queen Street East after all of the following have occurred:

 

a.  the Zoning By-law Amendment 14 125514 STE 32 OZ approved by the Ontario Municipal Board has come into full force and effect;

 

b.  site Plan Control Approval has been granted by the Ontario Municipal Board; and

 

c.  the issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the development on the site.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 1 above for the existing residential rental dwelling units.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a demolition permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for the 6 existing residential properties at 1327, 1329, 1333, 1335, 1337 and 1339 Queen Street East no earlier than issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 1 above, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.  the owner erect a residential building on the site no later than three (3) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

b.  should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 3.a. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on May 10, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application seeks approval to demolish 6 residential properties at 1327, 1329, 1333, 1335, 1337 and 1339 Queen Street East, containing a total of 8 dwellings, of which 5 are residential rental dwelling units.  These 6 properties are also subject to a related Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan application for the development of an 8-storey mixed-use building containing 96 residential units (File nos. 14 125514 STE 32 OZ / 15 145265 STE 32 SA).  The Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications have been approved by the Ontario Municipal Board and a Board order is pending.


This report recommends approval of the Section 111 permit application under Chapters 667 and 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of 6 residential properties containing 5 residential rental dwelling units, subject to conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1327, 1329, 1333, 1335, 1337 and 1339 Queen Street East - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92280.pdf

Speakers

Ricardo Miguel Ospina
Suzan MacKenzie, SM Hair Design

Communications (Community Council)

(May 9, 2016) E-mail from Suzan MacKenzie (TE.Supp.TE16.7.1)

TE16.8 - Request for Direction Report - 401-415 King Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 401-415 King Street West to support the position outlined in the report (April 25, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant in order to come to an agreement on an appropriate built form, heritage conservation and solutions to technical considerations, including parking and laneway widening and encroachment issues.


3.  City Council authorize the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to identify the matters, services and facilities pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to be secured in the event the Ontario Municipal Board approves the Zoning By-law amendment applications as proposed in whole or in part.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other City staff to take such actions as necessary to give effect to the recommendations in the report (April 25, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the redevelopment of 401-415 King Street West, with a 56-storey mixed use building including a 12-storey and 13-storey base building with two floors of retail uses and residential above.  The project is proposed to contain 615 dwelling units and 2,452 square metres of commercial space with 221 parking spaces and 656 bicycle parking spaces.  The proposed building height is 181 metres (187 metres including the mechanical penthouse).  The total gross floor area would be 48,214 square metres.  The density would be 22.9 times the area of the lot.

 

The owner of the site at 401-415 King Street West has appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing Council's failure to make a decision within the time required by the Planning Act.  A pre-hearing conference has been scheduled for July 14, 2016.  A full hearing has not yet been scheduled.

 

The proposal is not supportable in its current form.  The proposed tower and base building represent an overdevelopment of the site and would create an unacceptable form of development.  The proposed tower would not conform with Official Plan built form or heritage policies and does not satisfactorily respond to urban design guidelines related to the built form.

 

In particular:

 

-  the 56-storey tower height is excessive and out of context (the tallest tower proposed in the King-Spadina Secondary Plan area aside from the Mirvish/Gehery towers);

 

tower setbacks fail to meet minimum setback requirements;

 

podium massing fails to transition appropriately to adjacent developments and is out of scale with King Street West;

 

the proposed building fails to provide adequate space for the three dimensional presentation of the retained heritage frontages as part of the proposed building;

 

inadequate public realm (sidewalk) widths;

 

there is a lack of family sized units;

 

there is a shortfall in required indoor and outdoor amenity space;

 

there are an insufficient number of vehicular parking spaces;

 

the proposal represents an over development of the site.


The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the applicant's development proposal and appeal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 25, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 401-415 King Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92827.pdf
(April 22, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 401-415 King Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Direction Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92514.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 6, 2016) E-mail from Patrick Tan (TE.Supp.TE16.8.1)

TE16.9 - Request for Direction Report - 300 Commissioners Street - Site Plan Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
The Interim City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE16.9a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to defer the hearing on the referral of the Site Plan Control application for 300 Commissioners Street until such time as the second phase of the Port Lands Acceleration Initiative, which includes the Port Lands and South of Eastern Transportation and Servicing Master Plan Environmental Assessment, has been reported to City Council and endorsed by City Council, as the application and its referral to the Ontario Municipal Board are considered premature at this time.

 

2.  If the Ontario Municipal Board does not defer the hearing, then City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the Site Plan Control application for development at 300 Commissioners Street in its current form.

 

3.  Should the Ontario Municipal Board approve the application, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its Order(s) approving the application until such time as a full, complete resubmission of the application is made and circulated to relevant divisions and agencies and all revisions and identified pre-approval conditions through the circulation process have been met for the Site Plan Control application.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to address the issues outlined in this report and to enter into formal mediation with the applicant and the Ontario Municipal Board at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

Origin

(April 21, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Belleterre Real Estate Partners Limited (Belleterre) submitted a Site Plan Control application on March 21, 2015 that proposes to develop the northern portion of the site with a 5-storey, 13,447 square metre self-storage warehouse and a 371 square metre designer's studio at 300 Commissioners Street.  An option to lease the Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC) owned lands was granted and the option was exercise by Belleterre with Rose Corp retaining an interest in the property.  The applicant referred the application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on October 26, 2015, noting council's failure to make a decision on the application within the prescribed timeframe (30 days).

 

The purpose of this report is to review the proposal as submitted to the City and referred to the OMB.

 

This report recommends that the City Solicitor request the OMB to defer the hearing, or if the deferral request is not successful, to attend the OMB hearing in opposition to the current proposal together with City Planning staff.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 21, 2016) Report and Attachments 1 to 8 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 300 Commissioners Street - Site Plan Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92477.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(June 7, 2016) Supplementary report from the Interim City Solicitor on 300 Commissioners Street Site Plan Application Ontario Municipal Board Appeal Further Request for Direction (TE16.9a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-94055.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

TE16.12 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 40 Hanna Avenue, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated April 18, 2016, prepared by WZMH Architects and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services subject to the following conditions:

 

a.  Prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the building known as the Boiler House at 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street) including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the heritage property as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

i.  Provide an addendum to the Conservation Plan dated October 27, 2015, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the plans and drawings prepared by WZMH Architects dated April 18, 2016, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

ii.  Provide full building permit drawings including notes and specifications for the alterations and conservation including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iii.  Provide a Letter of Credit, including provisions for upward indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the addendum to the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.i. in the report (April 18, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

b.  Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall:

 

i.  Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the addendum to the Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.i. in the report (April 18, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

Origin

(April 18, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street).  The property is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and subject to an HEA and includes a factory building and a boiler house, both of which comprise the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Factory Complex.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 18, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92191.pdf
Attachment 1 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92192.pdf
Attachment 2 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92193.pdf
Attachment 3 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92194.pdf
Attachment 4 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92195.pdf
Attachment 5 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92196.pdf
Attachment 6 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92197.pdf

12a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)

Origin
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on April 21, 2016, considered a report (April 18, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)

Background Information (Community Council)
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (22 Liberty Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92549.pdf

TE16.13 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council include the property at Clarence Park on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register.

 

2.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at Clarence Square under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: Clarence Square (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (April 5, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

3.  If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4.  If there are objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5.  If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

6.  City Council include the views identified in the report (April 5, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in an amendment to the Official Plan Public Realm Policy, Section 3.1.1, Schedule 4.

Origin

(April 5, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include Clarence Square on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  Located on the east side of Spadina Avenue, north of Front Street West where it was laid out as a public square in the 1830s, Clarence Square is one of the oldest parks in the City.

 

Following research and evaluation according to Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation, it has been determined that Clarence Square merits designation under Part IV, Section 29 for its cultural heritage values.  The designation of Clarence Square under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act would help to ensure that all of the heritage values and attributes of the property are identified and conserved.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 5, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92072.pdf
Attachment 1 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92073.pdf
Attachment 2 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92074.pdf
Attachment 3 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92075.pdf
Attachment 4 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92076.pdf
Attachment 5 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92077.pdf

13a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square

Origin
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on April 21, 2016, considered a report (April 5, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square

 

Declared Interests
The following member(s) declared an interest:

 

Robert Allsopp - in that he is a consultant on the Heritage Conservation District.

Background Information (Community Council)
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Clarence Square
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92546.pdf

TE16.15 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 58 Roxborough Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the issuance of a permit to demolish the heritage building
at 58 Roxborough Drive, an "unrated" structure in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act subject to the following:

 

a.  City Council approve the replacement structure for 58 Roxborough Drive as shown in the plans and elevations along with the Heritage Impact Statement submitted by the applicant and prepared by Architecture Unfolded Inc., all date stamped received by Heritage Preservation Services on March 2, 2016 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and that the replacement structure be constructed substantially in accordance with the submitted plans;

 

b.  That prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the property at 58 Roxborough Drive including a demolition permit, but excluding permits for interior work, repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the applicant provide the following to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

 

i.  photo documentation of the existing structure at 58 Roxborough Drive; and

 

ii.  final building permit drawings for the replacement structure and a landscape plan  consistent with the plans and elevations submitted by the applicant and prepared by Architecture Unfolded Inc. date stamped received by Heritage Preservation Services on March 2, 2016, and with the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan.

Origin

(March 24, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of a designated non-contributing heritage property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (NRHCD) under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act and the construction of a replacement structure.

 

The proposal is to demolish an existing 2-storey building and to construct a new 2-storey residence. The existing property has been evaluated as an "unrated" structure in the NRHCD, and as per the District Plan is not considered to be of national, provincial, citywide or contextual heritage significant and does not contribute to the heritage character of the heritage conservation district.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 24, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 58 Roxborough Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91927.pdf
Attachment 1 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 58 Roxborough Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91928.pdf
Attachment 2 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 58 Roxborough Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91929.pdf
Attachment 3 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 58 Roxborough Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91930.pdf

15a - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 58 Roxborough Drive

Origin
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on April 21, 2016, considered a report (March 24, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division regarding Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 58 Roxborough Drive


Communications
(April 19, 2016) Presentation from Eduardo Ortiz, architecture unfolded inc. (PB.Supp.PB14.5.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pb/comm/communicationfile-59930.pdf)


Speakers
Eduardo Ortiz, Principal, architecture unfolded

Background Information (Community Council)
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 58 Roxborough Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92547.pdf

TE16.16 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 158 Sterling Road, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the alterations to the existing heritage building on the lands known municipally in the year 2016 as 158 Sterling Road, with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated February 8, 2016, prepared by E.R.A. Architects Inc., date-stamped received by Heritage Preservation Services February 8, 2016, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated February 8, 2016, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a.  That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 158 Sterling Road, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

 

i.  Provide an updated Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 158 Sterling Road, prepared by E.R.A Architects Inc., dated February 8, 2016, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

ii.  Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.i in the report (March 30, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for which authority was given by City Council on July 7, 2015, between the City and the property owner of 158 Sterling Road.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(March 30, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner & Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property at 158 Sterling Road and give authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement (HEA) with the owner. The property at 158 Sterling Road is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

At their meeting of July 7, 2015, City Council approved alterations to the property at 158 Sterling Road and gave authority for the City to enter into an HEA with the owner of the property. The applicant is now proposing additional alterations to the property which require Council's approval and will require an amendment to the existing HEA.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 30, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91919.pdf
Attachment 1 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91920.pdf
Attachment 2 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91921.pdf
Attachment 3 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91922.pdf
Attachment 4 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91923.pdf
Attachment 5 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91924.pdf
Attachment 6 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-91925.pdf

16a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road

Origin
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on April 21, 2016, considered a report (April 7, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road


Communications
(April 18, 2016) Presentation from Philip Evans, ERA Architects Inc (PB.Supp.PB14.2.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pb/comm/communicationfile-59926.pdf)

Speakers
Philip Evans, Principal, ERA Architects Inc.

Background Information (Community Council)
(April 22, 2016) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 158 Sterling Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92552.pdf

TE16.27 - Public Art Plan - 120-130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the 120 to 130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street Public Art Plan attached as Attachment 1 to the report (April 20, 2016) from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 120 to 130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.

 

This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the development overview; public art sites and opportunities; selection process; artwork integration; budget; jury composition; timeline; project team; artist mentorship program; and the role of the art consultant.

 

The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning - 120-130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92474.pdf
Attachment 1 - 120-130 Harbour Street and 10 York Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92475.pdf

TE16.28 - Public Art Plan - 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140, 142 and 144 Redpath Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140, 142 and 144 Redpath Avenue Public Art Plan as attached to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council's approval of 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140, 142 and 144 Redpath Avenue Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.

 

This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the development overview; the public art site and opportunities; selection process; technical review; budget; jury composition;  timeline; project team and role of the art consultant.

 

The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Program Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning - 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140, 142 and 144 Redpath Avenue Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92469.pdf
Attachments - 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140, 142 and 144 Redpath Avenue Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92470.pdf

TE16.29 - Public Art Plan - 2-4 Dundonald Street, 7-9 Gloucester Street, 587-599 Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the 2-4 Dundonald Street, 7-9 Gloucester Street, 587-599 Yonge Street - Public Art Plan attached as Attachment 1 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 2-4 Dundonald Street, 7-9 Gloucester Street, 587-599 Yonge Street - Public Art Plan.


The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.

This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the development overview; site context; project team; project description; public art site description; curatorial vision; the art selection process; the jury; preliminary estimated budget and projected schedule.

 

The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning - 2-4 Dundonald Street, 7-9 Gloucester Street, 587-599 Yonge Street - Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92508.pdf
Attachment 1 - 2-4 Dundonald Street, 7-9 Gloucester Street, and 587-599 Yonge Street - Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92509.pdf

TE16.30 - Public Art Plan - 130-132 Queens Quay East and 143-177 Lake Shore Boulevard East and 26 Richardson Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the 130-132 Queens Quay East and 143-177 Lake Shore Boulevard East and 26 Richardson Street Public Art Plan attached as Attachment 1 to the report (April 22, 2016) from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 130-132 Queens Quay East & 143-177 Lake Shore Boulevard East & 26 Richardson Street Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.

 

This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the development overview; development in context; implementation of Public Art; invitational competition process; Public Art Site(s); art requirements; jury composition; preliminary estimated budget and preliminary schedule.

 

The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 20, 2016) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning - 130-132 Queens Quay East, 1443-177 Lake Shore Boulevard East and 26 Richardson Street - Public Art Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92471.pdf
Attachment 1 - 130-132 Queens Quay East, 1443-177 Lake Shore Boulevard East and 26 Richardson Street - Public Art Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92472.pdf

TE16.40 - Construction Staging Area - Dundas Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Bills 544 and 545 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the closure of the south side sidewalk and curb lane on Dundas Street West fronting 2803 Dundas Street West for 2 months, from May 8, 2016, to July 8, 2016, as shown on Drawing No. 421G-2124 attached to the report (April 14, 2016) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council enact "No Stopping Anytime", on the south side of Dundas Street West from Indian Grove to a point 63 metres west for the duration of the lane closure outlined in the Recommendation 1 above.


3.  City Council adjust the "No Stopping 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Monday to Friday, except public holidays", on the south side of Dundas Street West from Royal York Road to a point 120 metres west of Annette Street to apply from Royal York Road to a point 63 metres west of Indian Grove and from Indian Grove to a point 120 metres west of Annette Street for the duration of the lane closure outlined in Recommendation 1 above.

 

4.  City Council adjust the "1 hour parking 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.", on the south side of Dundas Street West from a point opposite Heintzman Avenue to Indian Grove to apply from a point opposite Heintzman Avenue to a point 63 metres west of Indian Grove for the duration of the lane closure outlined in Recommendation 1 above.

 

5.  City Council adjust the regulation authorizing the operation of parking machines/meters, from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday and 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Saturday, on the south side of Dundas Street West from Quebec Avenue to Indian Grove to apply from Quebec Avenue to a point 63 metres west of Indian Grove for the duration of the lane closure outlined in Recommendation 1 above.

 

6.  City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

7.  City Council direct that Dundas Street West be returned to its pre-construction parking and traffic regulations when the project is completed.

Origin

(April 14, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Dundas Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

TAS Design Build is building an 8-storey condominium with ground floor retail and a 2.5 level parking facility at 2803 Dundas Street West, located at the southwest corner of Dundas Street West and Indian Grove.  To enable installation of the brick work, the Contractor must close the south side sidewalk and curb lane on Dundas Street West and establish a temporary pedestrian walkway in the south curb lane on Dundas Street West, for a period of 2 months.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 14, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92403.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-2124 - Construction Staging Area - Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92404.pdf

TE16.42 - Parking and Loading Amendments - Gerrard Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bills 560, 561 and 562 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council rescind the parking regulations outlined in Appendix A – By-Laws to be Rescinded, attached to the report (April 26, 2016) from the Director, Public Realm Section Transportation Services and the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council enact the parking and loading regulations outlined in Appendix B– By-Laws to be Enacted, attached to the report (April 26, 2016) from the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services and the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(April 26, 2016) Report from the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services and Director, Toronto and East York District, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting City Council approval to switch the parking along Gerrard Street East, between Yonge Street and Church Street from the north curb lane to the south curb lane on Gerrard Street East and add a dedicated WheelTrans loading zone as part of planned 2016 road reconstruction and streetscape improvements.

 

The proposed design as shown in Appendix "D" will maintain existing vehicle operations, improve pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, provide open planting areas and seating, and reconfigure existing parking to better serve the adjacent land uses, including the addition of a dedicated WheelTrans loading zone to serve Ryerson University on the south side of Gerrard Street East. The net effect will be a reduction from 17 parking spaces to 13 spaces. As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Gerrard Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 22, 2016) Report from the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services and the Director, Toronto and East York District, Transportation Services - Parking and Loading Amendments - Gerrard Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92507.pdf

TE16.43 - Installation/Removal of On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces - April 2016 (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
Bill 542 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the installation/removal of on-street accessible parking spaces at the locations identified in Appendix A attached to the report (April 15, 2016) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(April 15, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation/removal of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject streets, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 15, 2016) Report and Appendix A from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Installation/Removal of On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces - April 2016 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92545.pdf

TE16.45 - Parking Amendments - King Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 563 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve a "No Standing, 2:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m." regulation on both sides of King Street West, between Bathurst Street and Spadina Avenue.

Origin

(April 7, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on King Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to implement a "No Standing, 2:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m." regulation on both sides of King Street West, between Bathurst Street and Spadina Avenue.  These parking amendments are required to address on-going taxi congestion, loitering and sound pollution within the Entertainment District during the  early morning hours.

 

The report will address the changes on King Street West.  The required changes on the adjacent sections of Richmond Street West, Adelaide Street West and Wellington Street West will be addressed in a separate report to Toronto and East York Community Council, entitled "Parking Amendments – Richmond Street West, Adelaide Street West and Wellington Street West".

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 7, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Parking Amendments - King Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92414.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-2119 - Parking Amendments - King Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92415.pdf

TE16.53 - Downtown Streetcar Routes - Travel Time Study of Extended Peak Period Regulations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
14 - Parkdale-High Park, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Bill 543 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council enact the traffic and parking by-law amendments as set out in Appendix E to the report (April 18, 2016) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.


2.  City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision, including the introduction in Council of any and all bills that may be required.

Origin

(April 18, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Queen, Dundas and Carlton streetcar routes (referred in this report as "Downtown Streetcar Routes") carry approximately 115,000 passengers on an average weekday.  In order to reduce congestion on these routes and improve the reliability of streetcars, peak hour restrictions on stopping, parking and turning were extended on sections of these routes in November and December 2015.

 

This report covers the results of the data collection and analysis of travel time changes to transit and traffic operations before and after peak hour restriction changes.  Analysis of the TTC's Automatic Vehicle Location data reveal that in segments where no stopping hours are extended or new no left-turn signs are implemented, streetcar travel time has generally been reduced by approximately 1-1.5 minutes.  For the entire Roncesvalles-to-Parliament corridor, the amended traffic regulations have saved as much as 3 minutes per streetcar trip.  At certain route segments where peak hours were reduced, data indicate little to no change in streetcar travel time.  The savings may contribute to better, more reliable transit service, and have the potential to add more flexibility in scheduling, reduced transit vehicle requirements, or increased service in the future.  As a result of this study, peak hour restrictions have become more consistent across ward boundaries.

 

Also included in this report is a preliminary plan of operational changes currently being studied on other Toronto and East York District mixed-traffic streetcar route sections east of Parliament Street. A follow-up report recommending operational changes to improve streetcar service, i.e. extended peak hour restrictions, signal timing changes, etc., is expected to be submitted to Toronto East York Community Council in September 2016.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 18, 2016) Report and Appendices A to E from the General Manager, Transportation Services - Downtown Streetcar Routes - Travel Time Study of Extended Peak Period Regulations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92430.pdf

TE16.54 - Traffic Control Signals - Queen Street West and Abell Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Queen Street West and Abell Street.

Origin

(April 7, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Queen Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Queen Street West and Abell Street. This installation will provide crossing protection for pedestrians in this section of Queen Street West and will result in the loss of about nine pay and display parking spaces.  Due the lack of a sidewalk and the proximity of a driveway, pedestrian crossings will be prohibited on the east intersection leg.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 7, 2016) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Control Signals - Queen Street West and Abell Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92418.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-2105 - Traffic Control Signals - Queen Street West and Abell Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92419.pdf

TE16.65 - Exempting Western Battery Road, Between Pirandello Street and Lynn Williams Street, from the Requirements of Subsection 925-4B of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends:

 

1.  City Council exempt the implementation of Permit Parking on the north side of Western Battery Road, between Pirandello Street and Lynn Williams Street, from the requirements of subsection 925-4B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, until such time as the Toronto and East York Community Council considers a request for implementation of permit parking at that location.

Origin

(April 25, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

Subsection 925-4B of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925, Permit Parking, provides that:


Where permit parking is not currently available and where a petition requesting permit parking signed by the residents of a minimum of 25% of the total number of residential premises having a residential address on the street or the flank of the street is submitted to the General Manager, a poll shall be conducted in accordance with Chapter 190, Polling and Notification, to determine if the residents wish to have permit parking on their road or area, as the case may be.  In the event of a positive polling result, the General Manager shall report such result to the appropriate community council, which community council under delegated authority, shall be authorized to pass any necessary by-laws to implement permit parking on the road or area.  In the event of a negative result, permit parking shall not be extended to the road or area, and no further permit parking poll shall be conducted for a period of two years.

 

A poll regarding permit parking was conducted by the City Clerk's office on February 11, 2016 of the residents with residential premises having a residential address on Western Battery Road, between Pirandello Street and Lynn Williams Street.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 25, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton - Exempting Western Battery Road, Between Pirandello Street and Lynn Williams Street, from the Requirements of Subsection 925-4B of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92555.pdf

TE16.69 - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events in July, 2016

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant permission to City of Toronto Special Events to place objects in the reflecting pool contingent upon the following condition:

 

a.  receipt of all the necessary permits associated with the production of the event i.e. building permit, noise by-law extension permit.

 

2.  City Council require that this event compensate the City of Toronto, through the Facilities Management Division, for all City of Toronto expenses associated with the event above the standard staffing complement.

Origin

(April 18, 2016) Report from Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request an exemption from Municipal Code Chapter 237 “Nathan Phillips Square” for the following event to be held on Nathan Phillips Square in July 2016:

 

-   City of Toronto Special Events - "Fresh Wednesdays and Tasty Thursdays".

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 18, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events in July 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-92185.pdf

TE16.70 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Attention
Communications TE16.70.45 to TE16.70.53 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

A. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following requests, noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable By-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio area extending into the City's right of way:

 

1. Temporary liquor licence extension for The Great Hall/Cream Tangerine, Licence 812306, at 1087 Queen Street West from 12 midnight to 4:00 a.m. for the Worldwide Partner Conference After Party on July 12, 2016 during the 2016 Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference to be held from July 10 to 14, 2016. 

 

2. Temporary patio licence extension during Pride Toronto Festival for The Church Mouse - A Firkin Pub, 475 Church Street, to be held from 6:00 p.m. on Friday, July 1 to 11:00 p.m. on Sunday, July 3, 2016.

 

3. Temporary liquor licence extensions during the 19th Annual Green Space Festival at Barbara Hall Park for the following establishments:

 

Starry Night, June 30, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.

One World, July 1, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.

Lipstick Jungle, July 2, 2016, from 1:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.

Disco Disco, July 3, 2016, from 1:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.

 

4. Temporary liquor licence extension for The Toronto Christmas Market to be held on November 18 to 20, 2016 and December 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 16, 18 and 22, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., at The Distillery Historic District, 9 Trinity Street.

 

5. Temporary liquor/patio licence extensions for a Customer Appreciation Day to be held on June 26, 2016, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. at the Vivoli Restaurant, 665 College Street.

 

6. Temporary liquor/patio licence extensions for 11th Anniversary celebration of Vivoli to be held on July 9, 2016, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. at the Vivoli Restaurant, 665 College Street.

 

7. Temporary liquor licence for the Toronto Caribbean Carnival 2016 to be held from July 31, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., and August 1, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., at Fort York Historic Site.

 

8. Temporary liquor/patio licence extension for the 12th Annual "Salsa on St. Clair", to be held on July 9, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and July 10, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., on St. Clair Avenue West between Christie and Humewood on the east and Winona on the west, for the following establishments that may include but are not limited to:

 

Kibo Café 701 St. Clair Avenue West

The Wailer's Lounge 726 St. Clair Avenue West

Dave's 730 St. Clair Avenue West

Pain Perdu 736 St. Clair Avenue West

The Rushton 740 St. Clair Avenue West

Catch Seafood 744 St. Clair Avenue West

Nama Sushi 750 St. Clair Avenue West

Concession Road 760 St. Clair Avenue West

Ferro Bar & Lounge 769 St. Clair Avenue West

P.R.O.P. 770 St. Clair Avenue West

ZaZa 775 St. Clair Avenue West

Pukka 778 St. Clair Avenue West

Krave Coffee 781 St. Clair Avenue West

Pipers pub & Grill 782 St. Clair Avenue West

Nodo 794 St. Clair Avenue West

Dona Luz Pancho Villa 807 St. Clair Avenue West

Asada Mexican Grill 809 St. Clair Avenue West

La Creole 810 St. Clair Avenue West

Koiya 813 St. Clair Avenue West

Savera 815 St. Clair Avenue West

Fresco's Cuisine 816 St. Clair Avenue West

Stazione Centrale 820 St. Clair Avenue West

Dragon Delight Chinese Food 825 St. Clair Avenue W

Mi Terra 828 St. Clair Avenue West

 

9. Temporary patio licence extension for the Dundas West Fest event to be held on June 4, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., at 1251 Dundas Street West.

 

10. Temporary patio extension for O'Grady's Tap & Grill at 518 Church Street, during Pride Toronto Festival, to be held from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. on July 1, 2016, and 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. on July 2 to 3, 2016.

 

11. Temporary liquor licence extensions for the Toronto Caribbean Carnival 2016 events to be held on July 16, 2016 and July 23, 2015, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. (beer tents serving 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.) for Carnival City Party, at David Pecaut Square.

 

12. Temporary liquor licence extensions for The Toronto Beer Week Festival to be held from September 16 to 24, 2016, from 10 a.m. to 4:00 a.m., at the establishments listed:

 

3030 – 3030 Dundas Street West

Bar Radio – 615 College Street

Bryden's – 2455 Bloor Street West

C'est What – 67 Front Street East

Castro's Lounge – 2116E Queen Street East

Court Jester – 609 Danforth Avenue

Dave's On St. Clair – 730 St. Clair West

Halo Brewery – 247 Wallace Avenue

Kilgour's Bar Meets Grill – 509 Bloor Street West

Left Field Brewery – 36 Wagstar Drive

Monarch Tavern – 12 Clinton Street

Pour Boy – College Street – 583 College Street

Pour Boy – Manning Avenue – 666 Manning Avenue

Prenup Pub – 191 College Street

Prohibition Gastrohouse – 696 Queen Street East

Sauce – 1376 Danforth Avenue

Sin and Redemption Pub – 136 McCaul Street

Sneaky Dee's – 431 College Street

The Garrison – 1197 Dundas Street West

The Hideout on Queen – 482 Queen Street West

The Office Pub – 117 John Street

The Painted Lady – 218 Ossington Avenue

Town Crier Pub – 115 John Street

Victory Café – 581 Markham Street

Village Idiot Pub – 126 McCaul Street

 

13. Temporary patio licence extensions, during the 2016 Pedestrian Sundays in Kensington Market (PSK), to be held on June 26, July 31, August 28, and September 25, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the following establishments:

 

Graffiti's – 170 Baldwin Street

Eden Hall – 193 ½ Baldwin Street

Thirsty and Miserable – 197 Baldwin Street

KOS Restaurant – 61 Bellevue

Handlebar – 159 Augusta Avenue

The Boat – 158 Augusta Avenue

Banh Mi Bar – 189 Augusta Avenue

Cosmic Treats – 207 Augusta Avenue

Pizzaria Via Mercanti – 188 Augusta Avenue

The Embassy – 223 Augusta Avenue

Poetry Jazz Café – 224 Augusta Avenue

Jumbo Empanadas – 245 Augusta Avenue

Krepez – 253 Augusta Avenue

El Trompo – 277 Augusta Avenue

Trinity Common – 303 Augusta Avenue

Coalition – 349A College Street

Lola – 40 Kensington Avenue

Maison Close 1888 – 21 Kensington Avenue

Last Temptation – 12 Kensington Avenue

El Rey – 2A Kensington Avenue

 

With the following exceptions, patio extensions from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.:

 

June 26, 2016 and August 28, 2016:

 

Lola – 40 Kensington Avenue

Maison Close 1888 – 21 Kensington Avenue

Last Temptation – 12 Kensington Avenue

El Rey – 2A Kensington Avenue

 

July 31, 2016 and September 25, 2016:

 

Trinity Common – 303 Augusta Avenue

Coalition – 349A College Street

 

B.  City Council approve the following road closures:

 

1. Road closures during the St. Lawrence Festival, to be held on August 12 to 14, 2016, on Front Street from Scott Street to Church Street, 11:00 a.m. to 12: 00 a.m. on Friday, August 12, 2016, and Market Street from Front Street East to Wilton Street from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Saturday, August 13, 2016.

 

2. Road closures during the 2016 Pedestrian Sundays in Kensington Market (PSK), to be held on May 29,June 26, July 31, August 28, and September 25, and October 30, 2016, from 12 noon to 7:00 p.m., as follows:

 

St. Andrew Street (from the exit of the Green P to Kensington Avenue)

 

Kensington Avenue (from Dundas Street West to Baldwin Street)

 

Baldwin Street (from the exit of the Green P to Augusta Avenue)

 

Augusta Avenue (from Dundas Street West to Nassau Street, from Nassau Street to Oxford Street, from Oxford Street to College Street)

 

Evening Closures for the following:

 

Augusta Avenue (north of Oxford Street to College Street) from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on May 29, July 31, and September 25, 2016.

 

Kensington Avenue (south of Kensington Place to Dundas Street West) from 7:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. on June 26, August 28, and October 30, 2016.

 

C.  City Council concur in the action taken by the Toronto and East York Community Council in approving an amendment to the temporary liquor licence/patio extension end time of the The Fair Trade Show by changing the time from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., at the Heritage Court, Enercare Centre, Exhibition Place, due to the timing of the event.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

A.  The Toronto and East York Community Council under its delegated authority declared the following to be events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes:

 

1. Cirque du Soleil's Show "LUZIA" to be held on July 27, 2016 to October 16, 2016, at 51 Commissioners Street site in the Port Lands.

 

2. The 2016 Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference to be held from July 10 to 14, 2016.

 

3. Elle Canada VIP Reader Fashion Event "Choose the Dress: A Summer Party", to be held on June 2, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Berkeley Church, 315 Queen Street East.

 

4. The Church Mouse - A Firkin Pub, 475 Church Street, to be held from 6:00 p.m. on Friday, July 1 to 11:00 p.m. on Sunday, July 3, 2016 during the Pride Toronto.

 

5. The 9th Annual Green Space Festival to be held on June 30, 2016, from 5:00 to 11:59 p.m., on July 1, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 11:59, on July 2, 2016, from 1:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., and July 3, 2016, from 1:00 p.m. to 11:59, at Barbara Hall Park

 

6. The 5 to Watch Awards to be held on June 9, 2016, at George Brown College's Waterfront Campus, 51 Dockside Drive, from 5:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m.

 

7. The Leslieville Flea Event to be held on June 25, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., at The Distillery Historic District, 9 Trinity Street.

 

8. The Toronto Christmas Market to be held on November 18 to 20, 2016 and December 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 16, 18 and 22, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., at The Distillery Historic District, 9 Trinity Street.

 

9. The BPL and Kingston Accommodation Partners Event to be held on June 10, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., June 11, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., and June 12, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., at Rally Ossington, 12 Ossington Avenue.

 

10. PR Launch Event to be held on May 12, 2016, at 363 King Street West, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.

 

11. The Pour Boy on June 10, 2016 to July 10, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at 583 College Street for the UEFA EURO CUP 2016.

 

12. The 4th Annual Rosedale Art Fair to be held on June 11 and 12, 2016, along Yonge Street, from Woodlawn Avenue to Crescent Road, with a tent located outside the LCBO at 10 Scrivener Square.

 

13. The Nordstrom Canada Flagship Gala Store Opening to be held on September 14, 2016, at the Toronto Eaton Centre from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

 

14. Customer Appreciation Day to be held on June 26, 2016, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. at the Vivoli Restaurant, 665 College Street.

 

15. The 11th Anniversary celebration of Vivoli to be held on July 9, 2016, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. at the Vivoli Restaurant, 665 College Street.

 

16. The 55th Anniversary Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition with beer garden to be held on July 8, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., July 9, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. and July 10, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., in Nathan Phillips Square.

 

17. The Microsoft WPC Partner Celebration to be held on July 13, 2016, at the Air Canada Centre (ACC), from 7:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.

 

18. The Toronto Caribbean Carnival 2016 to be held from July 31, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., and August 1, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., at Fort York Historic Site.

 

19. The 12th Annual "Salsa on St. Clair", to be held on July 9, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and July 10, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., on St. Clair Avenue West between Christie and Humewood on the east and Winona on the west.

 

20. The North by Northeast Music Festival and Conference to be held from June 13 to June 20, 2016, at the following establishments:

 

Bovine Club, 542 Queen Street West

The Cameron Public House, 408 Queen Street West

Drake Hotel, 1150 Queen Street West

Drake One Fifty, 150 York Street

The Garrison, 1197 Dundas Street West

Hark Luck Bar, 772A Dundas Street West

The Horseshoe Tavern, 370 Queen Street West

Lee's Palace, 529 Bloor Street West

Nocturne, 550 Queen Street West

The Office Pub Lounge, 117 John Street

Rivoli, 334 Queen Street West

The Rock N Horse Saloon, 250 Adelaide Street West

The Silver Dollar Room, 486 Spadina Avenue

The Smiling Buddha, 961 College Street

Sneaky Dee's, 431 College Street

The Velvet Underground, 510 Queen Street West

 

21. The "MUSIC/ALE" event to be held on May 15, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at The Royal Cinema, 608 College Street.

 

22. The Wrist Book Launch and Literary Event to be held on June 18, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., at Merchants of Green Coffee, 2 Matilda Street.

 

23. The Opening Reception of SomeOther Show to be held on May 26, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the Gallery 50, located at 50 Gladstone Avenue.

 

24. The Budweiser X Burger Day to be held on May 28, 2016, from 11:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., at the LCBO, 2 Cooper Street.

 

25. The Toronto Cider Festival to be held on August 27, 2016, at Yonge-Dundas Square from 11:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and then from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.

 

26. The SCREEN QUEENS event to be held on May 22, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at The Royal Cinema, 608 College Street.

 

27. The Union Summer to be held on June 27, 2016 to September 5, 2016, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Monday to Fridays and 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 11:00 a.m. to sunset on Sundays, at Union Station.

 

28. The House Maison on June 30, 2016 to July 3, 2016, will be holding a "Meet and Greet" Indoor and Outdoor Event, to be held from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., on June 30, 2016, 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. on Friday and 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday, at 580/582 Church Street.

 

29. The 10th Anniversary Edition Luminato Festival event to be held on June 10, 2016, from 6:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m., June 11, 17, 18 24, 25 and June 26, 2016, at Hearn Generating Station, 440 Unwin Avenue.

 

30. The Village Festival to be held on June 25 and 26, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., at various Bars and Restaurants, as listed:

 

Black Eagle - 457 Church Street

Boutique Bar - 506 Church Street

Byzantium - 499 Church Street

Cafe California - 538 Church Street

Church Bistro - 555 Church Street

CHURCH on Church - 504 Church Street

Church Street Garage - 477 Church Street

Churchmouse & Firkin - 475 Church Street

Crews & Tangos - 508 Church Street

Flash 463 - Church Street

Fresh Burger - 542 Church Street

Hair of the Dog - 425 Church Street

Kawa Sushi - 451 Church Street

Kintaro Izakaya Restaurant - 459 Church Street

O'Gradys - 518 Church Street

Sambuca - 489 Church Street

Smith Restaurant - 553 Church Street

Statlers - 487 Church Street

Woody's - 467 Church Street

 

31. The FIT PRIMPIN during the Pride Toronto Festival to be held on July 1, 2016, at the Steam Whistle Brewery.

 

32. The Ward's Island Recreation Association Gala Day to be held from July 29 to August 1, 2016, at the Wards Island Clubhouse, with a beer garden.

 

33. The Plant Contemporary Art Gallery event to be held on June 2, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at the Harbourfront Centre.

 

34. The Dundas West Fest event to be held on June 4, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., at 1251 Dundas Street West.

 

35. The Retro Genre-Public Screenings event to be held on May 19 to 21, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at The Royal Cinema, 608 College Street.

 

36. The St Lawrence Festival to be held on August 12 to 14, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., on Front Street from Scott Street to Church Street, market Street from Front Street to The Esplanade, and Wilton Street, at restaurants and organizations, as listed:

 

Barsa Taberna – 26 Market Street

Market Street Catch – 14 Market Street

Balzac's Coffee Roasters – 10 Market Street

The St. Lawrence Market – 91-95 Front Street

Paddington's Pump – 95 Front Street East, Upper Level Unit 104

Bindia Indian Restaurant – 16 Market Street

Evolution Food Company – 12 Market Street

Cresta – 118 The Esplanade

 

37. The Toronto Beer Week Festival to be held from September 16 to 24, 2016, from 10 a.m. to 4:00 a.m., at the establishments listed:

 

3030 – 3030 Dundas Street West

Bar Radio – 615 College Street

Bryden's – 2455 Bloor Street West

C'est What – 67 Front Street East

Castro's Lounge – 2116E Queen Street East

Court Jester – 609 Danforth Avenue

Dave's On St. Clair – 730 St. Clair West

Halo Brewery – 247 Wallace Avenue

Kilgour's Bar Meets Grill – 509 Bloor Street West

Left Field Brewery – 36 Wagstar Drive

Monarch Tavern – 12 Clinton Street

Pour Boy – College Street – 583 College Street

Pour Boy – Manning Avenue – 666 Manning Avenue

Prenup Pub – 191 College Street

Prohibition Gastrohouse – 696 Queen Street East

Sauce – 1376 Danforth Avenue

Sin and Redemption Pub – 136 McCaul Street

Sneaky Dee's – 431 College Street

The Garrison – 1197 Dundas Street West

The Hideout on Queen – 482 Queen Street West

The Office Pub – 117 John Street

The Painted Lady – 218 Ossington Avenue

Town Crier Pub – 115 John Street

Victory Café – 581 Markham Street

Village Idiot Pub – 126 McCaul Street

 

38. The 9th Annual Enbridge Ride to Conquer Cancer event to be held on June 11 and 12, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Exhibition Place in parking lot 2 (200 Princes' Boulevard).

 

39. The 2016 Pedestrian Sundays in Kensington Market (PSK), to be held on May 29, June 26, July 31, August 28, September 25 and October 30, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 7:00 p.m., at the following establishments on June 26, July 31, August 28 and September 25, 2016:

 

Graffiti's – 170 Baldwin Street

Eden Hall – 193 ½ Baldwin Street

Thirsty and Miserable – 197 Baldwin Street

KOS Restaurant – 61 Bellevue

Handlebar – 159 Augusta Avenue

The Boat – 158 Augusta Avenue

Banh Mi Bar – 189 Augusta Avenue

Cosmic Treats – 207 Augusta Avenue

Pizzaria Via Mercanti – 188 Augusta Avenue

The Embassy – 223 Augusta Avenue

Poetry Jazz Café – 224 Augusta Avenue

Jumbo Empanadas – 245 Augusta Avenue

Krepez – 253 Augusta Avenue

El Trompo – 277 Augusta Avenue

Trinity Common – 303 Augusta Avenue

Coalition – 349A College Street

Lola – 40 Kensington Avenue

Maison Close 1888 – 21 Kensington Avenue

Last Temptation – 12 Kensington Avenue

El Rey – 2A Kensington Avenue

 

With the following exceptions, from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.:

 

June 26, 2016 and August 28, 2016:

Lola – 40 Kensington Avenue

Maison Close 1888 – 21 Kensington Avenue

Last Temptation – 12 Kensington Avenue

El Rey – 2A Kensington Avenue

 

July 31, 2016 and September 25, 2016:

Trinity Common – 303 Augusta Avenue

Coalition – 349A College Street

 

40. The West Neighbourhood House Fundraising Event to be held on June 11, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 5:00 p.m., in the private courtyard at 248 Ossington Avenue.

 

41. The 8Eleven Art Gallery Event, to be held on June 9, 2016, at 233 Spadina Avenue.

 

42. The 2nd Annual Toronto Artisanal Food Market, to be held on June 10, 2016 to August 28, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Adelaide Place at York Street and Adelaide Street. 

 

B. The Toronto and East York Community Council approved the following, due to the timing of the event, and requested City Council to concur in the action taken:

 

1.  An amendment to the temporary liquor licence/patio extension end time of the The Fair Trade Show by changing the time from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., at the Heritage Court, Enercare Centre, Exhibition Place, due to the timing of the event. 

 

C. The Toronto and East York Community Council was advised of the following:

 

1. Considered and adopted by City Council on May 3, 4, and 5, 2016, amending Item TE14.72, Recommendation A.6 respecting Taste of Little Italy by deleting the starting hours of operation for June 17, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 a.m., June 18, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., and June 19, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., for the following establishments:

 

460 College Street - No one writes to the Colonel

488 College Street - Point Bar

489 College Street - Snakes and Lattes

501 College Street - La Carnita

503 College Street - Dalio

505 College Street - Bar Raval

537 College Street - Mullins

539 College Street - Perla

546 College Street - Kalendar

552 College Street - Midtown

558 College Street - Duffs Famous Wings

559 College Street - Blnd Tger

573 College Street - Collision

574 College Street - College Street Bar

577 College Street - Side Car

582 College Street - Bar Italia

583 College Street - Pour boy

586 College Street - Utopia

587 College Street - Dish

588 College Street - Franks Kitchen

589 College Street - A3 Napoli

591 College Street - Tattoria Taverniti

593 College Street - Tattoria Giancarlo

594 College Street - Cafe Diplomatico

595 College Street - Sotto Voce

596 College Street - Spiceman Mexicana

597 College Street - Capitol Cafe

602 College Street - Hapa lzakaya

607 College Street - The Walton

612 College Street – Birreria Volo

613 College Street - La Forchetta

614 College Street - Pisco 1641

615 College Street - Bar Radio

633 College Street - Hogtown Pub

638 College Street - Urban Thai

640 College Street - Marinella

647 College Street - Night Owl

648 College Street - Eat My Martini

651 College Street - Soi Thai Street Food

652 College Street - Golden Wheat

656 College Street - Li'ly Restaurant

660 College Street - Bella Vista

665 College Street - Vivoli

667 College Street - Standard Café

669 College Street - Touche Tapas

690-692 College Street - Ryoji

707 College Street - Churassqueira Sardinha

712 College Street - Sicillian Sidewalk

713 College Street - Easy Restaurant

720 College Street - II Gatto Nero

722 College Street - Mod Club

760 College Street – Drop

783 College Street - Revival

12 Clinton Street - Monarch Tavern

50c Clinton Street - Backwoods Smokehouse

 

2. Considered and adopted by City Council on May 3, 4, and 5, a temporary liquor licence extension for the Pour Boy on June 10, 2016 to July 10, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at 583 College Street for the UEFA EURO CUP 2016.

 

3. Considered and adopted by City Council on May 3, 4, and 5, 2016, temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. each day (through to 4:00 a.m. on the evenings of June 13, June 14, and June 19, 2016) for the following venues during the North by Northeast (NXNE) Music Festival to be held June 13 to 20, 2016:

 

Bovine Club, 542 Queen Street West

The Cameron Public House, 408 Queen Street West

Drake Hotel, 1150 Queen Street West

Drake One Fifty, 150 York Street

The Garrison, 1197 Dundas Street West

Hark Luck Bar, 772A Dundas Street West

The Horseshoe Tavern, 370 Queen Street West

Lee's Palace, 529 Bloor Street West

Nocturne, 550 Queen Street West

The Office Pub Lounge, 117 John Street

Rivoli, 334 Queen Street West

The Rock N Horse Saloon, 250 Adelaide Street West

The Silver Dollar Room, 486 Spadina Avenue

The Smiling Buddha, 961 College Street

Sneaky Dee's, 431 College Street

The Velvet Underground, 510 Queen Street West

 

4. Considered and adopted by City Council on May 3, 4, and 5, 2016, temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. each day for the Hearn Generating Station, 440 Unwin Avenue, during the 10th Annual Luminato Festival, to be held from June 10 to June 26, 2016, for indoor bars only for the following days and times:

 

Friday, June 10, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

Saturday, June 11, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

Friday, June 17, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

Saturday, June 18, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

Thursday, June 24, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

Friday, June 25, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

Saturday, June 26, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. 4:00 a.m.

 

5. Considered and adopted by City Council on May 3, 4, and 5, 2016, temporary liquor licence/patio extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the following establishments during The Pride Festival to be held from June 26 and June 27, 2016:

 

Black Eagle - 457 Church Street

Boutique Bar - 506 Church Street

Byzantium - 499 Church Street

Cafe California - 538 Church Street

Church Bistro - 555 Church Street

CHURCH on Church - 504 Church Street

Church Street Garage - 477 Church Street

Churchmouse & Firkin - 475 Church Street

Crews & Tangos - 508 Church Street

Flash 463 - Church Street

Fresh Burger - 542 Church Street

Hair of the Dog - 425 Church Street

Kawa Sushi - 451 Church Street

Kintaro Izakaya Restaurant - 459 Church Street

O'Gradys - 518 Church Street

Sambuca - 489 Church Street

Smith Restaurant - 553 Church Street

Statlers - 487 Church Street

Woody's - 467 Church Street

 

6. Considered and adopted by City Council on May 3, 4, and 5, 2016, amending Item TE14.72, Recommendation B.4 respecting Taste of Little Italy by adding the following road closures on College Street from 6:00 p.m. on Friday, June 17, 2016 to 3:00 a.m. on June 20, 2016, and all side streets in the closure area to nearest laneway or to the rear of the College Street property as well the following:

 

Closure of Clinton Street, North of College Street to the laneway from Friday, June 17 at 4:00 a.m. to Monday, June 20 at 3:00 a.m. for the patio extension for Café Diplomatic at 594 College Street;

 

Closure of Montrose Avenue, North of College Street to the laneway from Friday, June 17 at 4:00 a.m. to Monday June 20 at 3:00 a.m. for the patio extension for Sicilian Ice Cream at 712 College Street; and

 

Closure of Beatrice Street, South of College Street to the laneway from Friday, June 17 at 4:00 a.m. to Monday, June 20 at 3:00 a.m. for the patio extension for Standard at 667 College Street.

Summary

Seeking Endorsement of events for Liquor Licensing Purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(April 5, 2016) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher requesting that Cirque du Soleil's Show LUZIA to be held on July 27, 2016 to October 16, 2016, at 51 Commissioners Street site in the Port Lands, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59813.pdf
(March 18, 2016) Letter from Lyndsey G. Creamer, requesting that the 2016 Microsoft Worldwide Partner Conference to be held from July 10 to 14, 2016, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting an extension of the liquor licence for The Great Hall/Cream Tangerine, Licence 812306, at 1087 Queen Street West from 12:00 midnight to 4:00 a.m. for the WPC After Party on July 12, 2016. (TE.Main.TE16.70.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59830.pdf
(April 19, 2016) Letter from Darryl Brown, Festival Chair, Little Italy BIA, requesting that The Annual Taste of Little Italy to be held June 17 to 19, 2016, obtain approval of road closures as outlined in the letter from Friday, June 17 at 4:00 a.m. to Monday June 20, 2016 at 3:00 a.m.; and requesting liquor licence/patio extensions for specific establishments listed in the letter, on June 17 from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m.; Saturday, June 18 from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 a.m. and Sunday, June 19 from 9:00 to 10:00 p.m. (TE.Main.TE16.70.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59817.pdf
(April 7, 2016) E-mail from Angela Valentini, Coordinator, Marketing, Communication and Events, requesting that Elle Canada VIP Reader Fashion Event "Choose the Dress: A Summer Party", to be held on June 2, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Berkeley Church, 315 Queen Street East; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.4)
(April 8, 2016) Letter from Emily Hay, General Manager, The Churchmouse - A Firkin Pub, requesting during Pride Toronto, a temporary patio extension at The Church Mouse - A Firkin Pub to be held from 6:00 p.m. on Friday, July 1 to 11:00 p.m. on Sunday, July 3, 2016 and request that the event be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59853.pdf
(April 5, 2016) Letter from John R. Farrell, The 519 requesting that various events to be held as part of the 9th Annual Green Space Festival on June 30, 2016, from 5:00 to 11:59 p.m., on July 1, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 11:59, on July 2, 2016, from 1:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., and July 3, 2016, from 1:00 p.m. to 11:59, at Barbara Hall Park, be declared events of municipal significance and request approval for liquor licence extension. (TE.Main.TE16.70.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59882.pdf
(April 11, 2016) Letter from Daniel Murphy, George Brown College Centre for Business, requesting that 5 to Watch Awards to be held on June 9, 2016, at George Brown College's Waterfront Campus, from 5:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m.; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59878.pdf
(April 14, 2016) Letter from Candace Shaw, Outdoor Events Coordinator, requesting that The Leslieville Flea Event to be held on June 25, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., at The Distillery Historic District; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59898.pdf
(April 14, 2016) Letter from Candace Shaw, Outdoor Events Coordinator, requesting that the Toronto Christmas Market to be held on November 18-20, 2016 and December 2, 3, 4, 9, 11, 16, 18 and 22, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m., at The Distillery Historic District; be declared an event of municipal significance and request approval for liquor licence extension. (TE.Main.TE16.70.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59899.pdf
(April 19, 2016) Letter from Jenn Mason, requesting that BPL and Kingston Accommodation Partners Event to be held on June 10, 2016 from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., June 11, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., and June 12, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., at Rally Ossington; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-59929.pdf
(April 12, 2016) E-mail from Karen Chan, Account Manager, requesting that a PR Launch Event to be held on May 12, 2016, at 363 King Street West, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m.; be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a patio extension for this event. (TE.Main.TE16.70.11)
(April 10, 2016) Letter from Graham Marko, the Pour Boy on June 10, 2016 to July 10, 2016, from 9:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at 583 College Street for the UEFA EURO CUP 2016; be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a temporary liquor licence extension. (TE.Main.TE16.70.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60130.pdf
(April 6, 2016) Letter from Clorraine Dennie, Executive Director, Rosedale Main Street BIA, requesting that the 4th Annual Rosedale Art Fair to be held on June 11 and 12, 2016, along Yonge Street, from Woodlawn Avenue to Crescent Road, with a tent located outside the LCBO at 10 Scrivener Square, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60131.pdf
(April 22, 2016) Letter from Russell Day, Vice President, Sales, Daniel et Daniel Catering and Events, requesting that Nordstrom Canada Flagship Gala Store Opening to be held on September 14, 2016, at the Toronto Eaton Centre from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60260.pdf
(April 22, 2016) Letter from Robert Salvati, Vivoli Restaurant Owner, request that a Customer Appreciation Day to be held on June 26, 2016, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and the 11th Anniversary on July 9, 2016, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., at 665 College Street; be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a temporary liquor licence/patio extension onto Beatrice Street, from 9:00 a.m., on both dates. (TE.Main.TE16.70.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60265.pdf
(April 21, 2016) Letter from Kirsten LaBonte, Logistics and Operations Manager, Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition requesting that the 55th Anniversary Toronto Outdoor Art Exhibition with Beer Garden to be held on July 8, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., July 9, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. and July 10, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., at Nathan Phillips Square; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60267.pdf
(April 25, 2016) E-mail from Chelsea Hewitt, requesting that WPC Partner Celebration to be held on July 13, 2016, at the Air Canada Centre, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.17)
(April 15, 2016) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc requesting that the Toronto Caribbean Carnival 2016 events to be held on various dates and locations from July 31, 2016, to August 1, 2016, as outlined in the letter from Councillor Mihevc, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence extensions, and beer tents/gardens for these events. (TE.Main.TE16.70.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60310.pdf
(April 26, 2016) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc requesting that the 12th Annual "Salsa on St. Clair", to be held on July 9, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and July 10, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., on St. Clair Avenue West between Christie and Humewood on the east and Winona on the west be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting temporary liquor licence/patio extensions for restaurants on the north and south side of St. Clair, including, but not limited to the restaurants listed in the letter. (TE.Main.TE16.70.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60311.pdf
(April 25, 2016) Letter from Mike Formusa, Financial Manager, NXNE, North by Northeast Festivals and Conference, requesting that the North by Northeast Music Festival and Conference to be held from June 13 to June 20, 2016, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. from June 13 until 4:00 a.m. on June 20, 2016, at selected Festival venues. Was considered by City Council on May 3 and 4, 2016 (TE.Supp.TE16.70.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60331.pdf
(April 29, 2016) E-mail from Simon Vidoczy, Theatre Administrator, Royal Cinema, requesting that "MUSIC/ALE" event to be held on May 15, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at The Royal Cinema, 608 College Street; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.21)
(May 2, 2016) E-mail from Nathan Adler requesting that Wrist Book Launch and Literary Event to be held on June 18, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., at Merchants of Green Coffee; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.22)
(May 2, 2016) E-mail from Michael Vieira, Constituency Manager, Office of Councillor Ana Bailão, requesting that the Opening Reception of SomeOther Show to be held on May 26, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., at the Gallery 50, located at 50 Gladstone Avenue; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.23)
(April 29, 2016) E-mail from Keith Walker, Account Coordinator, Mosaic, requesting that Budweiser X Burger Day to be held on May 28, 2016, from 11:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., at the LCBO, 2 Cooper Street; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.24)
(May 2, 2016) E-mail from Ijaz Jamal, Professor, Centre of Hospitality and Culinary Arts, George Brown College, requesting that the Toronto Cider Festival to be held on August 27, 2016, at Yonge-Dundas Square from 11:30 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. and then from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.25)
(May 2, 2016) E-mail from Simon Vidoczy, Theatre Administrator, The Royal Cinema, requesting that SCREEN QUEENS event to be held on May 22, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at The Royal Cinema, 608 College Street; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.26)
(May 2, 2016) Letter from Jeanette Janzen-Jones, Assistant, Programming and Special Events, requesting that Union Summer to be held on June 27, 2016 to September 5, 2016, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Monday to Fridays and 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Saturdays and 11:00 a.m. to sunset on Sundays, at Union Station; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60421.pdf
(May 3, 2016) E-mail from Heather Mackenzie, requesting that The House Maison on June 30, 2016 to July 3, 2016, will be holding a "Meet and Greet" Indoor and Outdoor Event, to be held from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., on June 30, 2016, 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. on Friday and 12:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. on Saturday and Sunday, at 580/582 Church Street; be declared and event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.28)
(May 2, 2016) Letter from Veronica Barton, Producer, Luminato Festival, requesting that the 10th Anniversary Edition Luminato Festival event to be held on June 10, 2016, from 6:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m., June 11, 17, 18 24, 25 and June 26, 2016, at Hearn Generating Station, 440 Unwin Avenue; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60423.pdf
(May 4, 2016) Letter from Stephanie McCracken, requesting that The Village Festival to be held on June 25 and 26, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., at various Bars and Restaurants listed; be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of road closures. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60424.pdf
(May 5, 2016) E-mail from Jeremy Laing, requesting that FIT PRIMPIN to be held on July 1, 2016, at the Steam Whistle Brewery, until 2:00 a.m.; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.31)
(April 18, 2016) Letter from Alison Gzowski, WIRA President, requesting that the Ward's Island Recreation Association Gala Day to be held from July 29 - August 1, 2016, at the Wards Island Clubhouse, with a beer garden, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60463.pdf
(April 27, 2016) Letter from Emilia Ziemba, Major Events and Business Development Officer, requesting that The Plant Contemporary Art Gallery event to be held on June 2, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at the Harbourfront Centre; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE16.70.33)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60455.pdf
(May 1, 2016) Letter from Michael Pesce and Joe Morais, requesting that Dundas West Fest event to be held on June 4, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., at 1251 Dundas Street West; be declared an event of municipal significance and temporary patio licence extension. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.34)
(April 26, 2016) Letter from Athanasios Bakoyiannis, Owner, O'Grady's Tap and Grill requesting during Pride Toronto Weekend, a temporary patio extension at the O'Grady's Tap and Grill at 518 Church Street, on July 1, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. and July 2 and 3, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.35)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60466.pdf
(May 6, 2016) E-mail from Simon Vidoczy, Theatre Administrator, Royal Cinema, requesting that the Retro Genre-Public Screenings event to be held on May 19 to 21, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., at The Royal Cinema, 608 College Street; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.36)
(May 5, 2016) Letter from Al Smith, St Lawrence Market Neighbourhood BIA, requesting that St Lawrence Festival to be held on August 12 to 14, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. and on August 13 and 14, 2016, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., on Market Street from Front Street East to The Esplanade, be declared an event of municipal significance; requesting approval of temporary patio extensions for the restaurants listed in the letter, and the necessary road closure on Market Street. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.37)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60458.pdf
(May 6, 2016) Letter from Rafik Riad, Founder, The Fair Trade Show, requesting to amend the hours of The Fair Trade Show to be held from June 3-5, 2016, at the Heritage Court, Enercare Centre, Exhibition Place, from 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.38)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60459.pdf
(May 6, 2016) Letter from Patrick Morrison, Coordinator, Kensington Market BIA, requesting that Pedestrian Sundays in Kensington Market to be held on May 29, June 26, July 31, August 28 and September 25 and October 30, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., at various locations; be declared an event of municipal significance; requesting approval of temporary liquor licence/patio extensions; and requesting approval of a temporary road closure for specific establishments listed in the letter. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.39)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60482.pdf
(May 6, 2016) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc requesting that the Toronto Caribbean Carnival 2016 events to be held on July 16, 2016 and July 23, 2016, from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. as outlined in the letter from Councillor Mihevc, requesting approval of temporary liquor licence extensions, and beer tents/gardens for these events. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.40)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60505.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Letter from George Milbrandt, Toronto Beer Week, requesting that the Toronto Beer Week Festival to be held from September 16 to 24, 2016, at various locations be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting an extension of the liquor licence for specific establishments listed in the letter. (TE.Main.TE16.70.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60506.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Jackson Ward, Event Production Manager, requesting that 9th Annual Enbridge Ride to Conquer Cancer event to be held on June 11 and 12, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., at Exhibition Place in parking lot 2 (200 Princes' Boulevard); be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.42)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60511.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Kaleigh Wiseman, requesting that West Neighbourhood House in conjunction with Dundas West Street Festival to be held on June 11, 2016, at the Courtyard of 248 Ossington Avenue, from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.43)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60521.pdf
(May 9, 2016) Letter from Scott Rondeau, Drink Inc., requesting that the Toronto Artisanal Food Market event to be held on June 10 to August 28, 2016, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Adelaide Place, 150 York Street; be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE16.70.44)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-60589.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 6, 2016) E-mail from Sam Mclelland (CC.New.TE16.70.45)
(March 16, 2016) Letter from Jaime Martino, Operations Director, Pride Toronto and Fatima Oliveria, Owner, Church Street Garage requesting a temporary liquor licence extension during the Pride Festival (CC.New.TE16.70.46)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61211.pdf
(May 31, 2016) E-mail from Fatima Mechtab, Marketing Director/Event Producer/P.R. Representative, Oasis Aqualounge requesting a temporary liquor licence extension during the North by Northeast (NXNE) Music Festival (CC.New.TE16.70.47)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61212.pdf
(June 1, 2016) E-mail from Nicholas Szidiropulosz, Owner, The Paddock Tavern requesting a temporary liquor licence extension during the Annual TD Toronto Jazz Festival (CC.New.TE16.70.48)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61213.pdf
(June 8, 2016) E-mail from Hirut Woldemichael, Hirut Cafe and Restaurant requesting a temporary liquor licence extension during the annual Ethiopian Soccer Tournament (CC.New.TE16.70.49)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61214.pdf
(June 8, 2016) E-mail from Mike Formusa, Financial Manager, North by Northeast (NXNE) Music Festival, requesting temporary liquor licence extensions during the North by Northeast (NXNE) Music Festival (CC.New.TE16.70.50)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61215.pdf
(May 26, 2016) Letter from Michael Simpson, Corporate Counsel, Michael Simpson LL.B. requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for Zipperz Bar during the Toronto Pride Festival and Canada Day weekend (CC.New.TE16.70.51)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61216.pdf
(June 1, 2016) Letter from Ben Freeman, Director of Development, Pride Toronto requesting temporary liquor licence extensions during the Pride Toronto Festival (CC.New.TE16.70.52)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61217.pdf
(May 18, 2016) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21 St. Paul's requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for the Grand Parade during the Toronto Caribbean Carnival 2016 (CC.New.TE16.70.53)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-61218.pdf

New Business and Business Previously Requested - Meeting 19

CC19.1 - Advance vote by-law for the 2016 by-election to fill the vacancy on the Toronto District School Board, Ward 1 - Etobicoke North

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke North
Attention
Bill 569 has been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(May 24, 2016) Report from the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk recommends that:

 

1.  City Council establish the following dates and hours for advance voting for the 2016 Toronto District School Board by-election to fill the vacancy in the office of trustee Ward 1 - Etobicoke North (City wards 1 and 2):

 

a.  Saturday, July 16, 2016, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; and

 

b.  Sunday, July 17, 2016, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.

 

2.  City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction of the bill attached as Appendix 'A'.

Summary

The Toronto District School Board (TDSB) has requested the City Clerk to conduct a by-election to fill the vacancy in the office of trustee for Ward 1 – Etobicoke North (City wards 1 and 2), which is vacant due to the resignation of Trustee Michael Ford on May 4, 2016. 
 

Section 65(3) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 (the MEA) states that by-elections must be conducted as far as possible in the same way as regular elections.

 

Pursuant to section 65(4)3 of the MEA, the City Clerk has established that, for the by-election to fill the vacancy on the TDSB, voting day will be July 25, 2016 and this report recommends advance vote dates and hours.

 

Section 43(1) of the MEA states that, at least 30 days before voting day, Council must pass a by-law establishing the dates and hours of the advance vote.

Background Information

(May 24, 2016) Report from the City Clerk on Advance vote by-law for the 2016 by-election to fill the vacancy on the Toronto District School Board, Ward 1 - Etobicoke North (CC19.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93676.pdf
Appendix A - Draft bill to establish the dates and hours of advance vote for the 2016 Toronto District School Board by-election
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93677.pdf
Appendix B - Toronto District School Board resolution, dated May 9, 2016, instructing the City Clerk to conduct a by-election
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93678.pdf

CC19.2 - Appointment of Public Members to the Lakeshore Arena Corporation Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Lakeshore Arena Corporation Board

Origin

(May 18, 2016) Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel, transmitted by the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel.

 

The Corporations Nominating Panel recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Lakeshore Arena Corporation Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on June 7, 2018, and until successors are appointed:

 

Bruce Hetherington

Robert J. Hunter

Jack Lawrence

 

2.  City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the report (May 11, 2016) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Lakeshore Arena Corporation Board.

Summary

The Corporations Nominating Panel will interview and recommend three candidates to City Council for appointment to the board of the Lakeshore Arena.

Background Information

(May 18, 2016) Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel (CC19.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93423.htm
(May 11, 2016) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Members to the Lakeshore Arena Corporation Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93424.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates and Qualifications Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Lakeshore Arena Corporation Board (previously distributed with Item NC7.3)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary (previously distributed with Item NC7.3)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview Schedule for the Lakeshore Arena Corporation Board Interviews on May 18 and 26, 2016
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview Questions for the Lakeshore Arena Corporation Board Interviews on May 18 and 26, 2016

CC19.3 - Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Board

Origin

(May 18, 2016) Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel, transmitted by the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel.

 

The Corporations Nominating Panel recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office commencing July 1, 2016 and ending July 1, 2018, and until successors are appointed:

 

Brenda Patterson

Laurel Walzak

 

2. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the report (May 11, 2016) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Board.

Summary

The Corporations Nominating Panel will interview and recommend two candidates to City Council for appointment to the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Board of Directors.

Background Information

(May 18, 2016) Decision Letter from the Corporations Nominating Panel (CC19.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93429.htm
(May 11, 2016) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93430.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates and Qualifications Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Board (previously distributed with Item NC7.2)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary (previously distributed with Item NC7.2)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview Schedule for the Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Board Interviews on May 18, 2016 (previously distributed with Item NC10.1)
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview Questions for the Pan Am Sports Centre Inc. Board Interviews on May 18, 2016 (previously distributed with Item NC10.1)

CC19.4 - Appointment of Members to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal to Fill Vacancies

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal

Origin

(May 20, 2016) Letter from the Tribunals Nominating Panel, transmitted by the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Tribunals Nominating Panel.

 

The Tribunals Nominating Panel recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint Cezary Paluch, as Chair of the Toronto Licensing Tribunal, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018, and until a successor is appointed.

 

2.  City Council appoint Melina Laverty to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018, and until a successor is appointed.

 

3.  City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (May 13, 2016) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal.

Summary

There are two vacancies on the Toronto Licensing Tribunal due to recent resignations. The Tribunals Nominating Panel needs to decide how to fill these vacancies. The two options for filling these vacancies include:

 

Option A:

Recommending two candidates who were previously interviewed and tested to City Council for appointment; or

 

Option B:

Short-listing, interviewing, and testing candidates who were not previously interviewed and then subsequently recommending two candidates to City Council for appointment.

Background Information

(May 20, 2016) Decision Letter from the Tribunals Nominating Panel (CC19.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93743.pdf
(May 13, 2016) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Members to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal to Fill Vacancies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93744.pdf
Confidential Atachment 1 - List of Candidates and Qualifications Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal (previously distributed with Item NQ8.1)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary (previously distributed with Item NQ8.1)
Attachment 1 - Resignation letter dated April 24, 2016 from Lori Marzinotto (previously distributed with Item NQ8.1)
Attachment 2 - Resignation Letter dated April 25, 2016 from Nicole Treksler (previously distributed with Item NQ8.1)

CC19.5 - Review and Analysis of Service and Working Conditions within Toronto Paramedic Services - Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(May 27, 2016) Report from the Chief, Toronto Paramedic Services and the Executive Director, Human Resources

Recommendations

The Chief, Toronto Paramedic Services and the Executive Director, Human Resources recommend that:

 

1.  City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

This report responds to City Council's request that the Chief, Toronto Paramedic Services and the Executive Director, Human Resources engage in consultation with authorized representatives of TCEU Local 416 (CUPE), including communication with and engagement of front-line staff, including paramedics, on Toronto Paramedic Services' (TPS') Five-year Plan and the ongoing collective efforts within TPS to improve employee engagement and morale.

 

In accordance with Council's direction, TPS has implemented a multi-year employee engagement initiative in an effort to improve working conditions and morale for all TPS staff. This process has included a confidential and anonymous employee engagement survey, as well as face-to-face brainstorming sessions. Throughout the process, TPS has continued to work closely with the City's Human Resources Division, as well as with both TCEU Local 416 (CUPE) and CUPE Local 79.

 

As a result of the input received from employees during the face-to-face brainstorming sessions, which ended in May 2016, TPS will continue to work with Human Resources and the Unions to review the results of these sessions over the summer. In the fall of 2016, TPS will provide updates to staff regarding these results and will undertake follow-up employee engagement activities during continuing education sessions beginning in January 2017. These activities will continue to occur in consultation with Locals 416 and 79, and with the City's Human Resources Division.

Background Information

(May 27, 2016) Report from the Chief, Toronto Paramedic Services and the Executive Director, Human Resources on Review and Analysis of Service and Working Conditions within Toronto Paramedic Services - Update (CC19.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93752.pdf

CC19.6 - Potential Acquisition of 450 Pape Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending land acquisition by the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions

Origin

(May 24, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Affordable Housing Office

Recommendations

The Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Affordable Housing Office recommend that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer, in consultation with the Director of Affordable Housing, to negotiate, and the City to enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale for 450 Pape Avenue (the "Property") with the owner of the Property, for a purchase price not to exceed the fair market value as outlined in Confidential Attachment 1, and a closing date not to extend beyond June 9, 2017 (the "Outside Closing Date"), together with such other terms and conditions deemed satisfactory to the Chief Corporate Officer, in consultation with the Director of Affordable Housing, and in form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer or the Director of Real Estate Services severally to execute and deliver the Agreement of Purchase and Sale and all documents related to this transaction on behalf of the City.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the transaction, in consultation with the Director, Affordable Housing Office, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers and notices, provided that she may, at any time, refer consideration of any such matters (including their content) to City Council for its consideration and direction.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the acquisition on behalf of the City including making payment of any necessary expenses, amending closing, due diligence and other dates not to extend beyond the Outside Closing Date, and on such terms and conditions as the City Solicitor may from time to time consider reasonable.

 

5.  City Council authorize the public release of the Confidential Information in Attachment 1 upon the completion of the acquisition of the Property, should the City decide to proceed with the acquisition of the Property for the purpose of creating affordable housing units.

 

6.  City Council authorize that the appropriate City officials be directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present preliminary cost estimates and funding information associated with the acquisition and renovation of 450 Pape Avenue for the purpose of creating affordable rental housing.

 

This report was requested by City Council and seeks Council direction on the acquisition and renovation of 450 Pape Avenue based on the information as outlined herein and in Confidential Attachment 1.

Background Information

(May 24, 2016) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Affordable Housing Office on the Potential Acquisition of 450 Pape Avenue (CC19.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93749.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC19.7 - 20 Lesmill Road - Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
34 - Don Valley East

Confidential Attachment - Litigation that affects the City and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(May 26, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1.

 

2.   City Council authorize the public release of the recommendations in Attachment 1 if adopted with the remainder of Attachment 1 to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council authorize the public release of Attachment 2 if the recommendations in Attachment 1 are adopted.

Summary

The owner of the property known as 20 Lesmill Road has appealed Official Plan Amendment 231 (OPA 231) to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  A hearing event is scheduled to commence on June 20, 2016.  The City Solicitor requires directions.

Background Information

(May 26, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 20 Lesmill Road - Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing (CC19.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93722.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on June 16, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93724.pdf

CC19.8 - 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East - Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West

Confidential Attachment - Litigation that affects the City and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(May 26, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1.

 

2.  Council authorize the public release of the recommendations in Attachment 1 if adopted with the remainder of Attachment 1 to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

 

3.  Council authorize the public release of Attachment 2 if the recommendations in Attachment 1 are adopted.

Summary

The owners of 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue (the "Lands") have appealed Official Plan Amendment 231 (OPA 231) as it applies to the Lands to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  To date, five pre-hearings have been held for OPA 231 and another hearing event is scheduled to commence on June 20, 2016.  The City Solicitor requires further directions.

Background Information

(May 26, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglinton Avenue East - Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing (CC19.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93721.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on June 16, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93720.pdf

CC19.9 - 10 St. Mary Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Demolition of Designated Heritage Property - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CC19.9a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendation contained in the Confidential Attachment 2 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the adopted recommendation in Confidential Attachment 2 with the remainder of Confidential Attachment 2 and Appendix "A" to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

Summary

The Ontario Municipal Board (the "OMB") has set a four day hearing from November 1 to 4, 2016, for the appeal of a zoning amendment for the site at 10 St. Mary St. At its meeting on November 3 and 4, 2015, City Council adopted the Recommendations of the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to oppose the zoning appeal at the OMB. The City Solicitor now requires further direction from City Council regarding the zoning appeal, which should be considered together with the applicant’s request to demolish the 8-storey designated office building located on the site.

Background Information

(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 10 St Mary Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Demolition of Designated Heritage Property Request for Directions (CC19.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93883.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Schedule A to By-law No. 353-1015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93884.pdf
Confidential Attachment 2
Confidential Appendix A
(June 7, 2016) Supplementary report from the Interim City Solicitor on 10 St Mary Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Demolition of Designated Heritage Property Request for Directions (CC19.9a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-94054.pdf
Confidential Attachment 2

CC19.10 - Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Request for Instructions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Litigation that affects the City and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that: 

 

1.  Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1.

 

2.  Council authorize the public release of the recommendations in Attachment 1 if adopted with the remainder of Attachment 1 to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

 

3.  Council authorize the public release of Attachment 2 if the recommendations in Attachment 1 are adopted.

Summary

Multiple land owners across the City have appealed Official Plan Amendment 231 (OPA 231) either from a policy perspective or with respect to the adopted designation of their lands to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  To date, five pre-hearings have been held for OPA 231 and a further hearing event is scheduled to commence on June 20, 2016. The City Solicitor requires further directions.

Background Information

(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on Appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Request for Instructions (CC19.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93887.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on June 16, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93889.pdf

CC19.11 - 2360-2378 Yonge Street and 31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue - Proposed Zoning By-law - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Confidential Attachment - Litigation that affects the City and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the recommendations in Attachment 1 if adopted with the remainder of Attachment 1 to remain confidential.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek further instruction given the potential for an Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing on the above-noted matter.  In general terms, the proposal is for a mixed-use building of 29 stories, with a density of 11.4 times site area.  Council previously authorized a settlement in principle for a zoning by-law for the development proposal.  This report seeks Council instructions with respect to revisions proposed by the applicant.  In the event that Council does not find the proposed revisions acceptable, staff understand that the applicant will seek an OMB ruling on the proposed revisions.

Background Information

(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 2360-2378 Yonge Street and 31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue - Proposed Zoning By-law - Request for Directions (CC19.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93868.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC19.12 - North Downtown Yonge Site and Area Specific Policy 382 - Official Plan Amendment 183 - Request for Direction Report - OMB Phase I Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor client privilege

Origin

(June 6, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of such Recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 as Council adopts.

 

3.  City Council authorize the public release of Appendix 1 and 2 if Council adopts Recommendation 1 in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

4.  City Council authorize the public release of Appendix 3 if Council adopts Recommendation 2 in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

5.  City Council direct that except as provided in Recommendation 2, 3 and 4 above, all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

At the meeting of October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013, Council enacted Official Plan Amendment 183 (OPA 183), comprising in part Site and Area Specific Policy 382 (SASP 382).  OPA 183 was subsequently appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (the OMB) by 17 appellants.  Several pre-hearings were held between August 19, 2014 to January 7, 2016 to, amongst other matters, scope the appeals, enable parts of OPA 183 to come into force, and divide the hearing into two phases.  Mediation for the Phase I Hearing was undertaken between February to April 2016 to determine opportunities for settling any of the issues that were identified through the pre-hearing process.  Hearing dates for the Phase I Hearing have been confirmed for September and November 2016 for a total of 11 days.  In addition, the OMB set a Phase I Settlement Hearing for June 21, 2016, in the event of any motions or evidence by the City of Toronto and/or other parties in regard to Official Plan Amendment 183 (By-law No. 1507-2013) that might be agreed to by the parties.  Direction is being sought from City Council for the Phase I Settlement Hearing.  City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(June 6, 2016) Report from the Interim City Solicitor on North Downtown Yonge Site and Area Specific Policy 382 - Official Plan Amendment 183 - Request for Direction - Ontario Municpial Board Phase I Hearing (CC19.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-94069.pdf
Confidential Attachments
(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on North Downtown Yonge Site and Area Specific Policy 382 - Official Plan Amendment 183 - Request for Direction - Notice of Pending Report (CC19.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93870.pdf
Confidential Appendices 1, 2 and 3 - made public on June 16, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-94473.pdf

CC19.13 - Scarborough Subway Extension Development Charges By-law - Request for directions regarding an Ontario Municipal Board hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and potential litigation

Origin

(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Recommendations

The City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommend that:

 

1.  Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  The recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report as well as Appendix "A" to Confidential Attachment 1, be made public at such time as Council adopts the recommendations.  All other information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek further instruction for the upcoming Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing on the above-noted matter.  A hearing into the appeal of the Scarborough Subway Extension Development Charges By-law 525-2015 (the "SSE DC By-Law") is scheduled for August 8 to19, 2016.

Background Information

(May 31, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Scarborough Subway Extension Development Charges By-law - Request for directions regarding an Ontario Municipal Board hearing (CC19.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93871.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on June 16, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93873.pdf

CC19.14 - Investigation Report Regarding the Conduct of Councillor Jim Karygiannis (Uber Driver)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(May 31, 2016) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.  Council adopt a finding that Councillor Karygiannis contravened Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct).

Summary

A member of the public filed a complaint alleging that Councillor Jim Karygiannis' conduct contravened the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (the "Code of Conduct" or the "Code") when he confronted the Complainant, her parents, and an Uber driver (the "Driver") on July 31, 2015.  It was alleged that the Councillor's words and actions toward the Complainant, her parents and the Driver constituted abuse, bullying, or intimidation prohibited by Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct) of the Code of Conduct.  

 

In the attached report, I conclude that the Councillor's conduct contravened the Code.  A finding of a contravention is significant, particularly for a new member of Council such as Councillor Karygiannis.  Although I recommend no remedial action or sanction, I expect that Councillor Karygiannis will review this report and Council's consideration of same and commit himself to adhering to the Code of the Conduct in all of his future interactions.

Background Information

(May 31, 2016) Covering Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Investigation Report Regarding the Conduct of Councillor Jim Karygiannis (Uber Driver) (CC19.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93857.pdf
(May 31, 2016) Investigation Report Regarding the Conduct of Councillor Jim Karygiannis (Uber Driver)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93858.pdf

CC19.15 - Investigation Report Regarding the Conduct of Councillor Jim Karygiannis (Parking Enforcement)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(May 31, 2016) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.  Council adopt a finding that Councillor Karygiannis contravened Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct) of the Code of Conduct.

 

2.  Council reprimand Councillor Karygiannis.

Summary

A member of the public (the "Complainant") filed a complaint alleging that Councillor Jim Karygiannis contravened the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (the "Code of Conduct" or the "Code") because of a series of interactions between the Councillor and the Complainant's family in relation to a parking issue. 

 

I investigated whether Councillor Karygiannis' conduct contravened Article VI (Use of City Property, Services, and Other Resources) and Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct) of the Code of Conduct.  In the attached report I conclude that the Councillor contravened Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct) of the Code of Conduct for acting in an intimidating manner toward the Complainant and her family with respect to a parking enforcement matter.  I recommend that City Council reprimand Councillor Karygiannis for his conduct.

Background Information

(May 31, 2016) Covering Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Investigation Report Regarding the Conduct of Councillor Jim Karygiannis (Parking Enforcement) (CC19.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93859.pdf
(May 31, 2016) Investigation Report Regarding the Conduct of Councillor Jim Karygiannis (Parking Enforcement)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-93880.pdf

Member Motions - Meeting 19

MM19.1 - Review of Registration at Recreation Programs - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Maria Augimeri

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Community Development and Recreation Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Maria Augimeri, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to review the current registration process for recreation programs across the City and to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on a strategy to ensure that local residents are given priority registration in recreation programs offered in their neighbourhoods, in particular where programs are offered free of charge.

Summary

Residents have reported that they are unable to register for programs at their local (priority) community centres due to the overwhelming interest in free programs across the City.

 

This Motion would ensure that local residents be given priority.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93711.pdf

MM19.2 - Temporary Delegation - Authority During the Summer Recess to Direct Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearings - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor David Shiner

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor David Shiner, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at Ontario Municipal Board Hearings on appeals of Committee of Adjustment decisions or to appeal a Committee of Adjustment decision on behalf of the City at the request of the Ward Councillor after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or designate, during the period from the completion of City Council's July 12 and 13, 2016 meeting to the start of City Council's October 5 and 6, 2016 meeting. The delegation shall include the authority to direct appropriate City staff to attend at the Hearing and for the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

 

2.  City Council request the City Solicitor to submit a status report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the use of the delegated authority during the summer recess. 

Summary

At the conclusion of the City Council meeting scheduled for July 12 and 13, 2016, City Council will be recessing until its meeting of October 5 and 6, 2016.  During that period it is likely that there will be decisions arising from applications to the Committee of Adjustment which will be matters of concern to the City and would warrant the City's attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board, either on an appeal by the City itself or on the applicant's appeal to the Board.

 

The purpose of this Motion is to delegate temporary authority during this period to the Ward Councillor to instruct the City Solicitor, and appropriate City staff, to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board on the application, provided the Ward Councillor has first consulted with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or her designate.  This would include the authority to direct the City Solicitor to file an appeal of a decision and retain outside experts as necessary.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93771.pdf

MM19.3 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision respecting 41 Jackman Avenue (A0128/16TEY) - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to continue discussions to negotiate a settlement on behalf of the City in her discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application A0128/16TEY for 41 Jackman Avenue, and authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and not oppose the appeal, subject to the conditions as recommended in the May 4, 2016 Staff Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  In the event a settlement cannot be reached, City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application A0128/16TEY respecting 41 Jackman Avenue.

Summary

The Toronto and East York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") refused a minor variance application related to the property municipally known as 41 Jackman Avenue on Wednesday, May 4, 2016 (the "Application").

 

The applicant is seeking relief from the provisions of Former Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 and City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 to construct a new three-storey detached dwelling.

 

The applicant has appealed the Committee of Adjustment decision to the Ontario Municipal Board (the "Board").

 

A May 4, 2016 Staff  Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District recommended that should the Committee approve the requested variances, any such approval be subject to two conditions (the "Conditions"). The first condition required that prior to the issuance of a demolition and/or building permit, the applicant satisfy all matters relating to City and privately owned trees to the satisfaction of the Supervisor, Urban Forestry, Tree Protection and Plan Review. The second condition required that the proposed dwelling be built substantially in accordance with the elevation drawings received by the Committee on April 6, 2016 showing the massing and location of the third floor, and that any other variances that may appear on these plans that are not listed in the written decision are not authorized.

 

This Motion would direct the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a settlement with the applicant. In the event a settlement cannot be reached, this Motion would direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Board to support the Committee's decision to refuse the Application.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93773.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 41 Jackman Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93776.pdf
(May 4, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 41 Jackman Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93777.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Public Hearing Notice on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 41 Jackman Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93782.pdf
41 Jackman Avenue Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93783.pdf

MM19.4 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decisions respecting 44 and 48 Lesmount Avenue - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a settlement in the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Applications B0011/16TEY, B0012/16TEY, A0201/16TEY, A0202/16TEY and A0203/16TEY for 44 and 48 Lesmount Avenue, and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City in her discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Ward Councillor.

 

2.  In the event a settlement cannot be reached, City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the appeal of the consent and minor variance applications regarding 44 and 48 Lesmount Avenue (B0011/16TEY, B0012/16TEY, A0201/16TEY, A0202/16TEY and A0203/16TEY) and retain outside consultants, if necessary.

Summary

The Toronto and East York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused two consent and three minor variance applications related to the property municipally known as 44 and 48 Lesmount Avenue on Wednesday, May 4, 2016.

 

The applicant is seeking consent to sever 44 and 48 Lesmount Avenue each into two residential lots. Two of the four resulting lots would then be merged to create a new residential lot, resulting in a total of three lots. The applicant is also seeking relief from the provisions of East York Zoning By-law 6752 and City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 to construct two new two-storey detached dwellings with integral garages and one new three-storey detached dwelling with an integral garage on the proposed new residential lots.

 

The applicant has appealed the Committee of Adjustment decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This application does not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan or Zoning By-law, is not desirable for the appropriate development of the land and is not minor.

 

This Motion would direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the appeal.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93760.pdf
Committtee of Adjustment, Toronto and York District Notices of Decision on applications for Consent and Minor Variance/Permission for 44 and 48 Lesmount Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93761.pdf
(April 28, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on variances for 44-48 Lesmount Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94065.pdf

MM19.5 - Release of Section 37 Funds for the Bloor-Yorkville BIA Bloor Street Transformation Project - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the 2016 Capital Budget for Transportation Services, on a one-time basis by $667,939.00 gross, $0 net, to be applied to the Bloor Street Transformation Project (CTP806-27), fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from the following developments:

 

a.  1 Bloor Street East, 23 Bloor Street East, 14 Hayden Street and Roy’s Square, secured for the purpose of improvements to Bloor Street in the vicinity of the lot, in the amount of $6,560.00 (source account XR3026-3700436); and

 

b.  94 Cumberland Street, secured for area streetscape and parkland improvements, as determined by the Chief Planner in consultation with the Ward Councillor, in the amount of $661,379.00 (source account XR3026-3700708)

Summary

At its meeting of July 19, 20, 21 and 26, 2005, City Council approved Item 48 of Policy and Finance Committee Report 7, entitled "A Proposed Financing Model for the Bloor Street Transformation Project".  The report recommended that City Council "finance the capital costs for the Bloor Street Transformation Project, up to a maximum of $25 million with $20 million (plus interest and maintenance reserve), being recovered, over a 20-year period, from benefiting property owners along Bloor Street within the new BIA, and the remaining $5 million being covered by the Bloor Street Transformation Reserve Fund which was established to accumulate funds acquired by the City through Section 37 contributions made in connection with area developments."

 

The project was completed in 2012 and outstanding claims by the contractor were settled in December, 2015.  The final cost of the project was $18,542,564.  To date, Section 37 and Section 41 contributions of $4,332,061, including interest, have been applied to the project.

 

This Motion seeks authorization to amend the 2016 Capital Budget of Transportation Services, to include additional Section 37 Planning Act Reserve Funds of $667,939 which shall be applied to the Bloor Street Transformation Project (CTP806-27) to fulfill the City's $5,000,000 funding commitment to the project.

 

Funds have been secured through Section 37 benefits from the development at 1 Bloor Street East, 23 Bloor Street East, 14 Hayden Street and Roy’s Square for the purpose of improvements to Bloor Street in the vicinity of the lot. In addition, funds have been secured through Section 37 benefits from the development at 94 Cumberland Street to be used for area streetscape and parkland improvements, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning,  in consultation with the Ward Councillor.   The funds have been received by the City from these developments and sufficient monies have not been spent or remain uncommitted to satisfy this motion.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93874.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94094.pdf

MM19.6 - 2 Carnwath Crescent - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing regarding Application A0007/16NY respecting 2 Carnwath Crescent in support of the Committee of Adjustment's position as decided at its meeting on February 18, 2016, and to retain outside planners and consultants, if necessary.

Summary

At its hearing on February 18, 2016, the Committee of Adjustment refused Application A0007/16NY respecting 2 Carnwath Crescent for variances to permit a driveway width of 9 metres. The house currently under construction includes a three car garage and the variances were requested to allow vehicles to access the third garage. The widening of the driveway would require the removal of a mature tree. A copy of the Committee of Adjustment decision is attached.

 

The applicant has since appealed the Committee's decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This Motion would direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to support the Committee of Adjustment's position as decided at its February 18, 2016 meeting.

 

The Ontario Municipal Board Hearing is scheduled for August 12, 2016 at 10 a.m.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93796.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 2 Carnwath Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93797.pdf

MM19.7 - Request for the Government of Ontario to Close Pickering Nuclear Station in 2018 - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Government of Ontario to direct Ontario Power Generation to close the Pickering Nuclear Station on August 31, 2018 when its existing Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission licence expires.

Summary

The Pickering Nuclear Station was expected to shut down on August 31, 2018 when its existing Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission licence expires. The Ontario Power Generation wants to extend its operation until 2024.

 

The Pickering Nuclear Station is the 4th oldest nuclear station in North America and the 7th oldest in the world. It is surrounded by more people – 2 million people within 30 kilometres – than any other nuclear plant in North America. Ontario has a large electricity surplus and no longer needs the Pickering Nuclear Station to keep our lights on. In 2015, Ontario exported more electricity than the Pickering Nuclear Station produced.

 

The Pickering Nuclear Station is one of the highest cost nuclear plants in North America. Closing the Pickering Nuclear Station will reduce Ontario's electricity costs by $900 million per year. The decommissioning and dismantling of the Pickering Nuclear Station could create 16,000 person-years of employment between now and 2030.

 

Ontario's future electricity needs can be met at a lower cost by water power imports from Quebec, energy efficiency investments and cost-effective Made-in-Ontario green energy. Closing the Pickering Nuclear Station will increase public safety for the residents of Toronto, Pickering, Ajax, Whitby, and Oshawa.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93839.pdf

MM19.8 - Requesting the Toronto Transit Commission to Report on Plans with Respect to Automated Public Transit Vehicles - by Councillor Michelle Holland, seconded by Councillor Norman Kelly

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michelle Holland, seconded by Councillor Norman Kelly, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to report to the Executive Committee by the fourth quarter of 2016 with respect to the Commission's strategic plan concerning the incorporation of automated vehicle technology within the City's transit system.

Summary

In January 2016 the "Wepod" was operated on a public street as part of a trial run in the Netherlands.  During the trial it traveled along a public street and is planned for use between Wageningen and Ede in the province of Gelderland.  The "Wepod" will operate using an app that will allow customers to enter a pick up point and a destination point on their smart device.  It is expected to begin regular operations shortly.  The City of Beverly Hills in California has not been particularly known for public transit in the past but it is looking to incorporate automated buses to pick up passengers which will then connect them to new rapid transit lines in the area.  As with "Wepod," these will collect passengers at any pick up point and transport them to the transit lines, again using an app. Cities such as Lausanne, Switzerland, and Zhengzhou, China are exploring the use of automated buses and more jurisdictions are certain to follow.  It is essential that with the current pace of technological change that the City of Toronto's public transit system properly prepare for the use of these new technologies.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93842.pdf

MM19.9 - Portion of 205 Wilmington Avenue (Irving W. Chapley Park) - Licence Agreement with Beth Emeth Bais Yehuda Synagogue - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City, as licensor, to enter into a non-exclusive licence agreement (the "Licence") for parking purposes with Beth Emeth Bais Yehuda Synagogue, for the paved southwest portion of the City-owned 205 Wilmington Avenue lands (Irving W. Chapley Park) having an area of approximately 35, 517.68 ft2 (0.82 acres) for a term of five (5) years for nominal consideration, substantially based on the following terms and on such other or amended terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor:

 

PROPOSED TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

 
The proposed Licence will be drafted in accordance with the following basic terms and conditions.

 

Licensor: City of Toronto

 

Licensee: Beth Emeth Bais Yehuda Synagogue

 

Licensed Area: southwest portion of 205 Wilmington Avenue with an approximate area of 35, 517.68 ft2 (0.82 acres)

 

Term: 5 years starting July 1, 2016 or a mutually acceptable date

 

Use: Non-exclusive parking for the Licensee and its worshippers and for no other use.

 

Non-Exclusive Use: The Licensee is prohibited from installing barriers or signage indicating that its worshippers have exclusive use of the Licensed Area and prohibiting use by the public.

 

Basic Licence Fee: Basic licence fees of $2/year ($10 over the course of the 5-year term payable at the Commencement Date)

 

Additional Fees: Licensee is responsible for all operating costs for the entire Licensed Area to make it suitable for parking use, including general maintenance, such as painting lines, adding bollards (if appropriate), removal of any debris, as well as snow removal.

 

Insurance:

 

i. Standard owner's automobile liability with limits of not less than $2 million in respect of any one accident.

 

ii. Commercial general liability including personal injury, employers' and contingent employers' liability, blanket contractual liability and provisions for cross liability and severability of interests and non-owned automobile liability of not less than $5 million per occurrence. The City of Toronto must be added as an additional insured.

 

Early Termination: The Licensor has the right to terminate the Licence for any reason at any time by providing the Licensee with three (3) months' prior written notice.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer, or designate, to execute the Licence on behalf of the City, and City Council deem the Licence to be in the interest of the City.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer, or designate, to administer and manage the Licence, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers and notices, provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its consideration and direction.

Summary

The former Corporation of the City of North York and Beth Emeth Bais Yehuda Synagogue (the "Licensee") entered into a lease agreement respecting a portion of the City-owned lands located at 205 Wilmington Avenue (the "City Lands") providing the Licensee and its worshippers with parking privileges for a term of eighteen (18) years commencing February 3, 1992 and expiring February 2, 2010 for nominal consideration. The lease was subsequently renewed for an additional three (3) year term commencing February 3, 2010 and expiring February 1, 2013. The lease also allowed the community to use the City Lands for parking purposes.

 

The Licensee wishes to continue to use the City Lands for parking purposes for nominal consideration. Staff from the City's Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division are in the process of developing a Master Plan for Irving W. Chapley Park and have no objections to allowing the Licensee to continue to use the City Lands on an occasional and non-exclusive basis for parking purposes, as long as Irving W. Chapley Park users and the surrounding community are also allowed to use the same. Due to the nature of the multi-party use of the City Lands, the use agreement will be classified as a licence moving forward.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93845.pdf

MM19.10 - Scarborough Southwest Film Hub - by Councillor Michelle Holland, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michelle Holland, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in collaboration with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report to the Economic Development Committee by the fourth quarter of 2016 with respect to recognizing, designating and supporting the Scarborough Southwest community as a film and television production "hub" within the City of Toronto.

Summary

Recently, Mayor John Tory announced several changes to encourage film and television production across the City of Toronto. These included advocacy for increased tax credits and financial incentives to attract more film and television production.

 

There was also the establishment of a working group from City Planning, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, Transportation Services, the Toronto Parking Authority and the Toronto Police Service that will strive to support in a collaborative way, film and television production within the City of Toronto.

 

The film and television industry is a $1.5 billion sector within the City of Toronto. The Scarborough Southwest community is ideal to host film production, and in fact is home to well known brands such as the television series "Murdoch Mysteries" and other productions. The area also includes businesses that support film and television production with props and vehicles.

 

With its considerable employment lands and large lots, Scarborough Southwest is ideally positioned to immediately support further film and television production.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93843.pdf

MM19.11 - Additional Funding for the Arts: Third Party Sign Tax Revenue - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications MM19.11.1 to MM19.11.3 have been submitted on this Item

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to review the various Sign Classes and Tax Rates in the Third Party Sign Tax By-law and report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee in the Fall of 2016, on possible amendments to Chapter 771 of the Municipal Code, to increase the annual revenues generated by the Third Party Sign Tax.

Summary

The Third Party Sign Tax was developed in 2009 in conjunction with the development of the Sign By-law, and implemented in 2010.  One of the objectives of the Third Party Sign Tax was to further implement the goals and objectives of the Sign By-law.  Signs permitted by the Sign By-law pay a lower tax rate, signs not permitted by the Sign By-law and/or with greater impacts on the public realm pay a higher tax rate.  Since 2010, the inventory and mix of third party signs in the City has been changing.  Some signs types have been increasing, other sign types have been decreasing.  With changes to the inventory of third party signs in the City as well as changes to the Sign By-law since 2010, is the third party sign tax able to generate additional revenues, while still being a fair tax?

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93812.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94093.pdf

Communications

(June 7, 2016) Letter from Leroy Cassanova, Director of Real Estate, Ontario, Astral Media Outdoor Inc. (MM.New.MM19.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/comm/communicationfile-61225.pdf
(June 7, 2016) Letter from Randy Otto, President, Pattison Outdoor Advertising LP (MM.New.MM19.11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/comm/communicationfile-61226.pdf
(June 7, 2016) Letter from Nick Arakgi, President, Outfront Media Canada LP (MM.New.MM19.11.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/comm/communicationfile-61209.pdf

MM19.12 - Conference on Emerging Technologies for Municipal Governments - by Councillor Michelle Holland, seconded by Councillor Norman Kelly

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michelle Holland, seconded by Councillor Norman Kelly, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in collaboration with other relevant City divisions, to plan a conference in the City of Toronto in 2017 on the subject of preparing for technological change at the municipal government level and that representatives from other cities, the federal and provincial governments, universities, private sector corporations and other interested parties be invited to attend the forum.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to review options for private sector support with respect to the costs of hosting the conference and further direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to submit regular reports to the Economic Development Committee on the progress of the planning process for the conference, beginning in Fall 2016.

Summary

The Australian city of Melbourne is comprehensively preparing for the emergence of so-called "smart" cities where rapidly evolving technologies are incorporated into current decision-making and strategic planning for future programming and service delivery.  In fact, Melbourne is planning to host a public forum called "Melbourne Conversations" where City leaders will invite representatives from smart cities such as San Francisco, Tel Aviv and Amsterdam in order that they might share their knowledge and advice on the rapidly changing realities of modern municipal government as it is impacted by technological change.

 

Such conferences bring together leaders from other cities, private sector companies, universities and individuals interested is leading the change that will inevitably affect all aspects of city life in the very near future.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93811.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94095.pdf

MM19.13 - Community Hub - Senhor Santo Cristo Catholic School - 30 and 66 Humbert Street - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to:

 

a.  initiate the process of amending the Zoning By-law, and if required, the Official Plan, to permit additional uses related to non-profit art spaces, studio space, community uses, youth and senior services, and other similar uses within the existing school building at 30 and 66 Humbert Street, subject to applicable performance criteria;

 

b.  host a community meeting, with the Ward Councillor, on the City-initiated By-law amendments noted in Recommendation 1, in July 2016, and give notice for this community meeting to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site; and

 

c.  report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council at its meeting on September 7, 2016, with recommended amendments to the Zoning By-law, and if required, the Official Plan.

Summary

As our community demographics shift, demands on community services are struggling to respond to the changing needs of residents. As communities shrink and grow governments must ensure that existing resources are meeting the needs of our neighbourhood.  Municipal governments have the added responsibility of ensuring land uses serve these changing communities, in addition to the delivery of services to these communities alongside, businesses, the not-for-profit sector and other government institutions such as our school boards.

 

After a lengthy accommodation review by the Toronto Catholic District School Board, it has been recommended that Senhor Santo Cristo Catholic School students be relocated to St. Luke Catholic School. This recommendation is in response to the changing demographics of the neighbourhood, but it also works to ensure future needs can be accommodated.  The local board trustee has been actively seeking to keep Senhor Santo Cristo Catholic School in public hands through a transformation into a community hub housing organizations serving our community.  In order to facilitate the transformation of Senhor Santo Christo into a community hub, a zoning amendment is required to allow for these uses on the site.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93846.pdf

MM19.14 - AGCO Liquor Licence - 209 Augusta Avenue - Via Mercanti Food Shop File 818029 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for M Quattro Inc., operating under the name Via Mercanti Food Shop, 209 Augusta Avenue (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.
 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

M Quattro Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 209 Augusta Avenue, operating under the name Via Mercanti. The application is for a restaurant with a proposed indoor capacity of 67 persons and an outdoor patio capacity of 24 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.  

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93854.pdf

MM19.15 - AGCO Liquor Licence - 455 King St. West - Fring's File 809533 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 2467415 Ontario Inc., operating under the name Fring's, 455 Kings Steet West (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.
 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

2467415 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 455 King Street West, operating under the name Fring's. The application is for a restaurant with a proposed additional indoor capacity of 193 persons and proposed additional outdoor patio of 66 persons. The total capacity for the existing and proposed capacities are 385 persons for indoor capacity  and 102 persons for outdoor patio for a grand total of 487 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.  

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93855.pdf

MM19.16 - 1070 Queen Street West - Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in opposition to the appeal of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of application A0027/16TEY and to retain outside consultants as necessary to support the City's position.

Summary

Application A0027/16TEY was submitted to the Committee of Adjustment seeking variances to permit alterations to an existing three-storey commercial building and the construction of a four-storey rear addition. A number of variances to Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 569-2013 were sought, including an increase in permitted gross floor area (1.12 times the area of the lot whereas 1.0 times is permitted), insufficient parking (two spots whereas four are required), reduced rear yard setbacks, and intrusion into the rear angular plane setback for a Commercial-Residential zoned property that abuts a Residential zoned property.

 

At a hearing on April 13, 2016 the Committee refused the application, finding the requested variances were not minor, were not desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and did not meet the intent and purpose of either the Official Plan or Zoning By-Law. The owner has now appealed that decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

The variances raise concerns about the impact of the expansion of the existing structure and commercial uses on the immediately adjacent neighbourhood. Accordingly, the following recommendation seeks to instruct staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment decision. Planning staff wrote a report that raised specific concern with the intrusion of the building into the rear angular plane, but did not oppose the application as a whole. As such it is recommended that the City Solicitor be granted authority to retain an outside planning consultant to provide expert evidence before the Board, if required.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93851.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 1070 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93852.pdf

MM19.17 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds, from 328-340 Adelaide Street West, to the Toronto District School Board towards Playground Improvements at Ogden Junior Public School - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the approved 2016 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $100,000 gross, $0 net (cost centre NP2161), fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338 and 340 Adelaide Street West, (source account XR3026-3700391), for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the school playgrounds at Ogden Junior Public School.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Director of Strategic Initiatives, Policy and Analysis, City Planning to execute an amending Community Access Agreement between the City and the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to playgrounds at Ogden Junior Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council request staff from Parks, Forestry and Recreation Management Services to participate in the preparation of the amending Community Access Agreement and request the City Solicitor to draw up the Amended Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Community Planning staff.

 

4.  City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the Toronto District School Board has signed an amended Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, drawn up in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

This Motion seeks Council authority to release $100,000 of Section 37 funds received from the development at 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338 and 340 Adelaide Street West to the Toronto District School Board for the purpose of funding playground ground improvements at Ogden Junior Public School located at 33 Phoebe Street. The funds will go towards Phase 2 of the playground and field improvements. Phase 1 of the improvements, to which $100,000 in Section 37 funds was contributed, focused largely on improvements to the playground itself, and is subject to a completed community access agreement. Phase 2 will see improvements to the playing field, adjacent to the playground. This funding is needed to replace a previous secured allocation for the school playground of $100,000 which will no longer be received as it is uncertain that the contributing development will be proceeding.   

 

Section 37 funds in the amount of $1,500,000 have been secured by an Order of the Ontario Municipal Board dated June 3, 2011 that approves a site-specific Zoning By-law 890-2011(OMB) for lands at 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338 and 340 Adelaide Street West.  The funds were secured for a range of capital improvements and public benefits including local parks.  A total of approximately $549,459 remains unspent and can be utilized for the identified capital facilities/community benefits. 

 

Council approved Implementation Guidelines for Section 37 provide states that:

 

"Cash contributions toward the capital improvement of school board playgrounds are eligible S.37 community benefits where the playground serves as a local park, where the public will continue to have reasonable access for the foreseeable future, and where there is no local City-owned parkland performing a similar function in the same community that could otherwise benefit from the cash contribution."

 

In the absence of a City playground nearby, the Ogden Junior Public School playground serves that purpose for the wider community with the play facilities and field currently being used after hours by community members. 

 

An amended Community Access Agreement to be signed by the Toronto District School Board will contain provisions governing the purpose of the additional funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the field at the school. The amended Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the Toronto District School Board, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93817.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94096.pdf

MM19.18 - Release of Section 37 Funds from the Development at 426 University Avenue for Capital Improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation Properties in Alexandra Park - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the approved 2016 Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on a one-time basis by $170,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from 426 University Avenue (source account XR3026-3700306) for transfer to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation in order to undertake capital improvements to basements of townhomes being constructed in Alexandra Park (cost centre: (for Expenditure) CC FD5101 CE 5036 and (for Revenue) CC FD0R01 CE 9265).  

 

2.  City Council direct that the $170,000.00 be forwarded to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, subject to Toronto Community Housing Corporation signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

This Motion recommends the release of Section 37 Planning Act funds to Toronto Community Housing Corporation for the purpose of funding capital improvements at Toronto Community Housing Corporation properties located in Alexandra Park.

 

The Revitalization of Alexandra Park is well underway.  Developed through collaboration with residents, the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, the Atkinson Housing co-op and the City, the 10-15 year Revitalization project includes: zero displacement of local residents, 333 new townhome and apartment units and 473 refurbished apartment units, expanded community recreation facilities, including a new 1,100 square metre (minimum) community centre, new parks and new basketball courts, 4,000 square feet of local social enterprise, bike sharing stations and a commitment to expanding affordable rental housing and home ownership in Alexandra Park (a plan to do so has already been approved by Council).

 

The first phase of replacement townhomes is nearing completion.  However, there is potential usable space in the basements in Phase 1a of the new townhomes, which are currently unfinished.  Until they were nearing completion, the need for this space in the townhomes (given the smaller footprint occupied by the new units) was not fully clear. These funds will be used to finish the basement ceilings with drywall or an approved substitute in the first 40 rental townhouses constructed as part of Phase 1a of the revitalization. 

 

The Toronto Community Housing Corporation has agreed that these funds sourced as community benefits from Ward 20 developments will not be used for capital improvements that would have been included on the Toronto Community Housing Corporation's list of Ward 20 capital projects.

 

Funds have been secured from the development at 426 University Avenue as community benefits through Section 37 Planning Act to be used by the City for facilities, services or matters, which may include affordable housing projects in Ward 20, local park improvements, and streetscape improvements to Dundas Street West.  The funds identified have been received by the City.

 

The Toronto Community Housing Corporation will be required to sign an Undertaking that will govern the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements, prior to the funds being released to Toronto Community Housing Corporation by the City.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM19.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93819.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94097.pdf

MM19.19 - Establishing Responsibility for Planters and Tree Pits in the Public Rights of Way - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee . A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to consult with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in the first quarter of 2017 to clarify maintenance rules and responsibilities for private property owners with regards to planters and tree pits in public Rights-of-Way, including boulevard areas.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to consult with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and explore alternative ways to increase awareness and notify adjacent property owners of their responsibilities to maintain planters and tree pits in the Right-of-Way, and to develop a strategy, including remedial and cost recovery options for dealing with negligent owners.

 

3.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to consult with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and provide a cost estimate for the City to assume full responsibility for maintaining tree pits and planters in the Right-of Way.

Summary

In the lead up to World Pride 2014, my office, the Church Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area, and the City of Toronto made extraordinary effort to ensure the Church-Wellesley village was putting its best face forward to the world.  Thirteen new public art installations, Toronto’s first parklet program, and a massive fireworks display encompassed some of the more noticeable initiatives, but smaller scale interventions took place as well. 

 

Wellesley Street East from Yonge Street to Jarvis Street has a series of nine tree planters in the public right-of-way that have long been neglected and fallow.  My office worked with the Church-Wellesley Village BIA on securing donated plant material, soil, and tools, and with a group of local volunteers replanted the pits in advance of World Pride.  Working with Parks, Forestry and Recreation, we were able to ensure the new flowers and greenery were maintained for the duration of the international festival.

 

Unfortunately, the end of World Pride saw the return of the status quo, with the planters once again falling into disrepair.  Due to the lack of clarity around who is responsible for maintaining and replanting, tree pits across the City often become receptacles for garbage, cigarette butts, and drug paraphernalia.  These eyesores foster a negative image of the City for residents and tourists alike.  Without proper on-going maintenance, the millions of dollars we have invested in our street furniture will have been wasted.  

 

It is in the City's interest to create a clear policy and communication strategy identifying parties responsible for maintaining public infrastructure in the rights-of-way, with a mechanism for ensuring costs incurred by the City due to negligent property owners are borne by the negligent owners themselves.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93864.pdf

MM19.20 - Amendment to Section 37 Contributions - 2161-2165 Lake Shore Boulevard West - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council delete Part 4.A.i. of Item EY5.1 adopted by Council on May 5, 6 and 7, 2015 and adopt, instead, the following new Part 4.A.i.:

 

4.A.i.  "The Owner agrees to make a cash contribution to the design and construction of the Village Court East to a maximum amount of $500,000, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which amount shall be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade Building Permit for Tower A."

Summary

At its meeting of May 5, 6 and 7, 2015, City Council approved the proposed development at 2161-2165 Lake Shore Boulevard West subject to a number of conditions, including Section 37 benefits. One of the Section 37 benefits required was that the owner design and construct the Village East Court up to an amount of $500,000.

 

The requirement has now changed and the owner is requested to make a cash contribution of $500,000 toward the design and construction of the Village East Court.    

 

The purpose of this Motion is to amend the Section 37 contribution in this matter.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93865.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94098.pdf

MM19.21 - Request for Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 20 Garden Place - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor, City Planning staff, and any other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 20 Garden Place to support the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the requested severance and variance applications.

Summary

The owners of the land municipally known as 20 Garden Place applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent to sever (Application B85/15EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A747/15EYK and A748/15EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings, each with an integral garage.

 

Staff reviewed the application and recommended a deferral to provide the applicant an opportunity to have further discussion with Planning staff and the community in order to develop a revised proposal that is more in keeping with the established physical character of the neighbourhood and more in accordance with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-laws. The local community and I submitted letters raising concern that the consent and minor variance applications were not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-laws, nor in keeping with the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood.  We recommended a refusal of the applications.

 

On March 10, 2016, the Committee refused the consent and minor variance applications.

 

The Committee of Adjustment's decision has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.  To date, a hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93881.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York District Notice of Decision on application for Consent and Minor Variance/Permission for 20 Garden Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93882.pdf

MM19.22 - Request for Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 30 Thirty Sixth Street - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor, City Planning staff, and any other appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 30 Thirty Sixth Street to support the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the requested severance and variance applications.

Summary

The owners of the land municipally known as 30 Thirty Sixth Street applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent to sever (B2/16EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A13/16EYK and A14/16EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings, each with an attached garage.

 

Staff reviewed the application and recommended a deferral to provide the applicant an opportunity to have further discussion with Planning staff and the community in order to develop a revised proposal that would be more in keeping with the established physical character of the neighbourhood and more in accordance with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-laws. The local community and I submitted letters raising concern that the consent and minor variances would not be in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-laws, nor the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood.  We recommended a refusal of the consent and minor variance applications.

 

On April 14, 2016, the Committee refused the consent and minor variance applications.

 

The Committee of Adjustment's decision has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.  To date, a hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93866.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York District Notice of Decision on Application for Consent and Minor Variance/Permission for 30 Thirty Sixth Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93867.pdf

MM19.23 - Request for Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 356 Eastern Avenue - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and any appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing (OMB File No. PL160404) in support of the appeal of and in opposition to the Committee of Adjustment's approval on condition of the minor variances at 356 Eastern Avenue (File No. A1253/15TEY), and to retain outside consultants if necessary.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to pursue discussions with the applicant to try and resolve the outstanding issues in advance of the Ontario Municipal Board hearing.

Summary

The applicant has applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A1253/15TEY) for minor variances from City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 and former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86 to permit the construction of 18 pre-manufactured portable storage modules.  At its hearing of March 9, 2016 the Committee of Adjustment approved the requested variances on condition.  The neighbours in the residential enclave on Saulter Street to the north of the subject site have appealed the Committee's decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This property has been subject to a number of previous Committee of Adjustment applications, dating back to 2001.  The concerns raised by the City through these previous applications, particularly the traffic impact on the residential enclave on Saulter Street to the north, are present in the current application.  In its current form, the proposal does not represent good planning, is not desirable for the appropriate development of the neighbourhood, adversely impacts the established residential neighbourhood on Saulter Street, and is not minor.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the matter has already been appealed by the neighbours to the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93994.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 356 Eastern Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93995.pdf

MM19.24 - Liquor Licence Application - 117 Peter Street - The Anne Boleyn - Licence No. 817985 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 117 Peter Street, operating under the name The Anne Boleyn ("Premises"), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises at 117 Peter Street.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

2504121 Ontario Incorporated has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 117 Peter Street, operating under the name The Anne Boleyn ("Premises"). The application is for an indoor capacity of 204 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. This application for a new liquor licence is not in the public interest, unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-93996.pdf

MM19.25 - Liquor Licence Application - 93 Harbord Street - Magic Noodle - File No. 810354 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 93 Harbord Street, operating under the name Magic Noodle ("Premises"), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises at 93 Harbord Street.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

2481054 Ontario Incorporated has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 93 Harbord Street, operating under the name Magic Noodle ("Premises"). The application is for an indoor capacity of 30 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area. This application for a new liquor licence is not in the public interest, unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94001.pdf

MM19.26 - Liquor Licence Application - 696-698 Bloor Street West "Alberts Parlour" - File No. 818011 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for Swaappy Sports Bar Inc., operating under the name Alberts Parlour, 696-698 Bloor Street West (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.
 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
 

3.  The City Solicitor be authorized to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

Swaappy Sports Bar Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 696-698 Bloor Street West, operating under the name Alberts Parlour (“Premises”). The application is for a restaurant with a proposed indoor capacity of 125 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to either issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.  

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94000.pdf

MM19.27 - 151-177 Roehampton Avenue and 140-144 Redpath Avenue - Technical Amendment to By-law No. 1356-2015 - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item TE12.4. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Bill 579 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council amend By-law No. 1356-2015 by replacing the words "Diagram 2" with the words "Diagram 3" in Parts 4(a)(iii) and 4(a)(iv) as well as by adding Diagram 3 as attached to this Motion.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to bring forward to the June 7 and 8, 2016 meeting of City Council  a bill to make the changes noted in Part 1 above to By-law No. 1356-2015.

 

3.  City Council determine that, pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is to be given in respect of the changes to By-law No. 1356-2015.

Summary

At its meeting held December 9 and 10, 2015, City Council adopted Toronto East York Community Council Item TE12.4 which amended Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, to permit a 38-storey mixed-use building at 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140, 142 and 144 Redpath Avenue.

 

It has come to City Planning’s attention that an error was made in the resulting By-law No. 1356-2015. Diagram 3, concerning height limits, was inadvertently left out of the final version of the By-law. The diagram was always intended to apply to the site and is included in the version of the Zoning By-law which was attached to the report (October 16, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

As such, By-law No. 1356-2015 should be amended by replacing the words "Diagram 2" with the words "Diagram 3" in Parts 4(a)(iii) and 4(a)(iv) as well as by adding Diagram 3 attached to this Motion, which will result in the intended height limits for the site being in effect. It is appropriate that the technical amendments as set out in the Recommendations above be made to By-law No. 1356-2015, without the need for any further public notice. A copy of the correcting By-law as well as Diagram 3 are attached to this Motion.

 

This item is urgent as the City needs to ensure that the developer adheres to the height limit intended for the building at 151, 157, 161, 165, 167, 171, 173 and 177 Roehampton Avenue and 140, 142 and 144 Redpath Avenue as it proceeds with construction.

 

REQUIRES RE-OPENING

 

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE12.4 - December 9 and 10, 2015 only as it pertains to the addition of Diagram 3.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94002.pdf
Draft Bill and Diagram 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94029.pdf

MM19.28 - Gun Amnesty/Buyback Program - by Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Manager to investigate the feasibility of partnering with a corporate sponsor to achieve the City's goals of a Gun Amnesty/Buyback program as described in this Motion and request the City Manager to report back to the July 12 and 13, 2016 Council meeting on a plan for immediate implementation.

 

2. If no corporate sponsor can be found in time, City Council direct the City Manager to report back to the July 12 and 13, 2016 Council meeting on a plan for the City of Toronto to immediately implement a Gun Amnesty/Buyback program on its own.

Summary

In August 2000, a motion was passed at City Council pertaining to a Gun Amnesty/Buyback program entitled "Operation: Save a Life". This program has been successful in many North American jurisdictions, including Toronto. The Gun Amnesty/Buyback gives citizens a legal route to properly dispose of their unwanted firearms, without the threat of prosecution, and in turn, increasing the safety of our communities.

 

The Amnesty/Buyback program is intended to encourage people that have guns in the house, whether their own or that of a friend or relative, to turn them into police before they fall into the hands of criminals. The amnesty part of the program is for people that turn in the guns, not for anyone who may have used them during a crime.

 

When the City launched the program in 2000, we were successful in taking 2,000 firearms off the street in just two weeks at a total cost of only $100,000 or $50 per gun, less than the cost of investigating just one murder case.

 

With gun violence rising throughout the City, a repeat of this program would be greatly beneficial in the decrease of firearms on our streets and in our neighbourhoods.

 

The City can proceed on its own with an offer of $100 per gun, or partner with a corporate sponsor such as a grocery chain to offer grocery gift cards in the amount of $200 which would increase the incentive to turn in unwanted firearms and decrease the cost to the City of Toronto.

 

Whether the incentive is offered directly through the City of Toronto or a corporate sponsor, a Gun Amnesty/Buyback program, with minimal costs, will have enormous benefits and increase safety.

 

While this will not solve all of our problems, I feel that the benefits of getting as many unwarranted guns off the streets, before they become a problem, is well worth the effort.

 

This Motion is urgent as there has been a spike in the use of firearms. Past experiences show that it gets worse in the summer months, so it is critical that Council deal with this issue, at this meeting, in order to get the program up and running as soon as possible.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94003.pdf

MM19.29 - 148 Borden Street - Request for City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary to oppose the proposed variances requested in Application No. A0091/16TEY respecting 148 Borden Street. 

Summary

The applicant has applied to the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") for minor variances to permit the alteration of an existing four-storey triplex at 148 Borden Street by adding a fourth dwelling unit in the basement and to maintain the second floor of the detached garage in the rear yard for storage (the "Application").  The Application is known as municipal file number A0091/16TEY.  The building currently contains three dwelling units.  

 

At its hearing on April 20, 2016, the Committee refused the Application and all the variances (the "Decision").  A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee is attached.  In the opinion of the Committee, the Application did not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan or the Zoning By-law, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and the variances were not considered minor.   

 

The applicant has appealed the Committee's Decision to refuse the Application to the Ontario

Municipal Board (the "Board").  

 

This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary in order to support the Committee's Decision to refuse the Application.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the applicant has already appealed the Committee's Decision to the Board and the City Solicitor requires instructions and direction to support the Committee's refusal of the Application and oppose the applicant's appeal.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94047.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 148 Borden Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94046.pdf

MM19.30 - Release of Section 37 Funds from the Development at 929 - 939 Sheppard Avenue West for Capital Improvements to Outdoor Amenity Space on the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Property at 6250 Bathurst Street - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1. City Council increase the 2016 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on a one-time basis by $12,178.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from 929, 931, 933, 935, 937 and 939 Sheppard Avenue West (source account XR3026-3700124) for transfer to Toronto Community Housing Corporation in order to undertake capital improvements to the outdoor amenity space at the property located at 6250 Bathurst Street  (cost centre: (for Expenditure) CC FD5101 CE 5036 and (for Revenue) CC FD0R01 CE 9265).  

 

2. City Council direct that the $12,178.00 be forwarded to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, subject to Toronto Community Housing Corporation signing an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

This Motion recommends the release of Sections 37 Planning Act funds to Toronto Community Housing Corporation for the purpose of funding capital improvements to outdoor amenity space located on the Toronto Community Housing Corporation property at 6250 Bathurst Street.

 

West Don Apartments is a Toronto Community Housing Corporation seniors mandated building located at 6250 Bathurst Street near Steeles Avenue. The funds will be used to build an outdoor patio space for the residents of the building to enjoy. The patio would add much needed community space to the building which only currently has a single room for residents to use.

 

Funds have been secured from the development on the lands municipally known as 929, 931, 933, 935, 937 and 939 Sheppard Avenue West as community benefits through Section 37 of the Planning Act to be used by the City towards park and/or community facilities within Ward 10.

 

Toronto Community Housing Corporation will be required to sign an Undertaking that will govern the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements, prior to the funds being released to Toronto Community Housing Corporation by the City.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94031.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94099.pdf

MM19.31 - 121 City View Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke North
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item EY13.2. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Bills 580, 581 and 582 have been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council delete the following Part 6 from the decision on Item EY13.2:

 

6.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the applicant to enter into a Site Plan Agreement under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act.

Summary

At its meeting of May 3, 4 and 5, 2016, City Council approved an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to convert a vacant industrial building into a funeral home and crematorium at 121 City View Drive in Ward 2 – Item EY13.2.

 

The Supplementary Report, dated April 4, 2016 inadvertently included the following recommendation:

6.   Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the applicant to enter into a Site Plan Agreement under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act. 

In order for the Site Plan Agreement to proceed, the necessary Bills must be introduced to Council to allow for the review of the Site Plan application against applicable zoning standards.  The recommendation outlined above prevents this from happening.    As such, a technical amendment is required to remove the recommendation.

 

This is a Council approved application.  This minor technical amendment is urgent because the site plan approval and building permit process cannot proceed with the inclusion of Part 6. This has caused unnecessary delays to the applicant.    

 

REQUIRES RE-OPENING

 

Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY13.2 - May 3, 4 and 5, 2016 City Council meeting, only as it pertains to Part 6 of City Council's decision.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94045.pdf

MM19.32 - Request to accept in-kind donation of new Playground at Driftwood Parkette in York West - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to accept the in-kind donation of $55,000.00 USD in playground and related equipment from KaBOOM!, Inc. and The Independent Order of Foresters for the Driftwood Parkette playground in compliance with the policy on Donations to the City of Toronto for Community Benefits.
 

2.   City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to enter into an agreement with KaBOOM!, Inc. to accept and install the playground equipment at Driftwood Parkette on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

Summary

Authority is being sought to enter into an agreement to accept a $55,000.00 USD in-kind donation of playground equipment from KaBOOM!, Inc. and  The Independent Order of Foresters (Foresters insurance) towards the installation of a new playground at Driftwood Parkette, 359 Driftwood Avenue.

 

KaBOOM! is a U.S.-based charity also active in Canada. Its mission is to provide a playground within walking distance of every child in North America. KaBOOM! recruits funding partners to provide the funds to purchase the playground equipment. In this case, the funding partner is Foresters, a member-governed organization active in Toronto. KaBOOM! has been a partner previously with the City of Toronto in other playground donations, including successful builds in 2015 (Heron Park) and 2014 (MacGregor Park).

 

Central to the KaBOOM! philosophy is the involvement of the local community in the design and building of the playground, to strengthen community bonds. In the case of Driftwood Parkette, the non-profit Black Creek Community Farm is acting as a partner to recruit volunteers and help organize the project, under the supervision of Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The local tenants' advisory council for Toronto Community Housing is also engaged.

 

Driftwood Parkette is located in the Black Creek neighbourhood (Jane-Finch), a designated Neighbourhood Improvement Area in the City's Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy.

 

Parks, Forestry and Recreation staff have worked with the local Councillor, the community and donors to develop and design a new playground structure. Proposed build days are August 11, 12 and 13, 2016. Site preparation would take place August 11 and 12, 2016 while the final build with volunteers, donors, and Parks, Forestry and Recreation would take place August 13, 2016. All work would be done in accordance with the City's policies and contractual obligations, including the Fair Wage Policy and Contractual Obligations in the Construction Industry Policies. 

 

Driftwood Parkette currently does not have a playground.  The playground and related equipment will be provided by KaBOOM!, Inc. and The Independent Order of Foresters. 

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94051.pdf
(June 8, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94120.pdf

MM19.33 - 1030 and 1040 Islington Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment - by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Items EY12.2 and MM17.33. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open those Items. If re-opened, the previous Council decisions remain in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Bill 583 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend By-law 293-2016, "To amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code, as amended, with respect to the lands municipally known in the year 2016 as 1030 and 1040 Islington Avenue" as follows:

 

a. by deleting Schedule 'B' in its entirety and replacing it with the Schedule 'B' attached as Attachment 1 to this Motion; and

 

b. by deleting section 8.c.ii. in its entirety and replacing it with the following:

 

8.c.ii.  the maximum distance from the northernmost part of a building to the north side lot line of the Lands (Norseman Street) shall be 17.6 metres, except for a portion of the building in the northwest corner which shall have a maximum permitted setback from the north side lot line of 15.0 metres, all as shown on Schedule 'B' as attached.

 

2. City Council determine that no further notice is required pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act.

Summary

At its meeting of March 10, 2016, City Council approved Item EY12.2 to permit amendments to the former Etobicoke Zoning Code and City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1030 and 1040 Islington Avenue to permit 176 residential townhouses and an industrial building on the site.

 

At its meeting of March 31, 2016, City Council approved amendments through Item MM17.33 to the former Etobicoke Zoning Code and City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 1030 and 1040 Islington Avenue. These amendments corrected the performance standards relating to maximum setbacks from the south side lot line, minimum vehicle parking stall dimensions and the height of solid acoustic barriers. At the same meeting, City Council enacted By-laws 292-2016 ("To amend Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, as amended, with respect to the lands municipally known in the year 2016 as 1030 and 1040 Islington Avenue") and 293-2016 ("To amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code, as amended, with respect to the lands municipally known in the year 2016 as 1030 and 1040 Islington Avenue").

 

The applicant has submitted a building permit application (File No. 16-144032 B01). Through this review, Toronto Buildings identified minor inconsistencies between the plans submitted and By-law 293-2016 adopted by Council. These relate to the permitted setbacks between buildings in the development and the maximum setback from the north lot line for the industrial building. City Planning has confirmed that the plans submitted for the re-zoning application (File No. 08 220984 WET 05 OZ) are consistent with the plans submitted for building permit. City staff support minor amendments to By-law 293-2016 to permit the construction of the development as reviewed by staff through the re-zoning application and approved by Council through Items EY12.2 and MM17.33.

 

This matter is urgent because the applicant cannot proceed with their building permit application in a timely matter unless these minor errors are corrected.

 

REQUIRES RE-OPENING

 

Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY12.2 - March 10, 2016 City Council meeting and MM17.33 - March 31, 2016 City Council meeting, for the purpose of correcting minor errors.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.33
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94049.pdf
Attachment 1 - Schedule B
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94050.pdf

MM19.34 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision respecting 820 Cosburn Avenue - by Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton.

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
31 - Beaches-East York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other relevant staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decision to refuse the minor variances in the original application, or any variances that exceed the revised proposal as listed in the Notice of Decision related to 820 Cosburn Avenue, A0110/16TEY.

Summary

On April 20, 2016, the Committee of Adjustment refused an application to alter the existing one-storey detached dwelling by constructing second and third storey additions, front and rear two-storey additions, a front platform with canopy above, a rear ground floor deck, and a rear third floor platform.  The applicant revised the application at the Committee to reduce the height to 9 metres and removed the variance for a large third floor platform. The revised application was refused and the decision has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

The application for variances was refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan is not maintained, the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law is not maintained, the variances are not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances are not minor.

 

I am therefore seeking Council approval to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.34
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94035.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 820 Cosburn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94036.pdf

MM19.35 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision respecting 5 Bermondsey Road and 1200 O'Connor Drive (A1229/15TEY) - by Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
31 - Beaches-East York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to support the Committee of Adjustment's decision to approve minor variance application A1229/15TEY regarding 5 Bermondsey Road and 1200 O'Connor Drive and to request the Ontario Municipal Board append to its decision the conditions imposed in the Committee of Adjustment's decision.

Summary

The Toronto and East York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment approved on condition an application for minor variances related to the property municipally known as 5 Bermondsey Road and 1200 O'Connor Drive on Tuesday, March 8, 2016. The application sought to alter the existing industrial building by constructing a new south side addition, new unloading station and new silos in the north side yard. The Committee of Adjustment's approval was subject to four (4) conditions.

 

The decision of the Committee of Adjustment has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board by third parties.

 

The conditions imposed by the Committee of Adjustment were recommended in reports from Planning and Transportation Services staff. This Motion would direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to support the Committee of Adjustment's decision to approve the variances and to ensure the conditions imposed in the Committee of Adjustment's decision form part of the Ontario Municipal Board's decision.  

 

This matter is urgent because the City Solicitor requires direction for ongoing discussions with the parties involved in the appeal. An Ontario Municipal Board hearing has been scheduled for September 26, 27 and 28, 2016.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.35
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94032.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 5 Bermondsey Road and 1200 O'Connor Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94033.pdf

MM19.36 - Canada Post Review - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council communicate its decisions on Items MM48.8, PG5.7 and MM17.8 with respect to Canada Post future directions, with emphasis on the potential integration of banking and postal services, to the Canada Post Review Task Force, the Canada Post Review Secretariat and Public Services and Procurement Canada, to ensure that the significant safety, accessibility and financial concerns flowing from any changes in mail delivery, similar to those proposed in the 2013 Community Mailbox Program, are considered.

Summary

In 2014 and 2015, Toronto City Council made several decisions related to potential changes in Canada Post's future directions (MM48.8, PG5.7 and MM17.8). The Government of Canada is undertaking a new review of Canada Post with public consultations currently underway.

 

City Council has an opportunity to reiterate its positions to the federal independent Task Force as they develop a discussion paper, (set for release in September 2016). The paper will form the basis of further consultations that focus on specific options for reform. Once the options have been identified, the City will have another opportunity and a more meaningful reference point from which to provide its input.  

 

This Motion is urgent as the deadline for formal comment to the Task Force who will be formulating the recommendations is June 23, 2016.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.36
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94066.pdf

MM19.37 - Develop a Strategic Plan to Address Gun Violence across the City for the Summer Months - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Manager to immediately establish an inter-divisional table with membership that includes staff from Social Development, Finance and Administration and other divisions as appropriate, the Toronto Police Service and the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to develop a strategy to address gun violence across the City for the summer months.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to report to the July Council meeting on any impediments to information sharing between the City, the Toronto Police Service and the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and how they could be overcome.

Summary

Torontonians are worried about the rising number of incidents regarding guns and gun fire in communities. Residents of Toronto Community Housing Corporation are very worried for their families and their safety.  In following up on a number of incidents  regarding gun fire on Toronto Community Housing Corporation properties, it has become evident that the working relationship between the senior levels of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the Toronto Police Service could be stronger and the City can  play an important role in bringing the parties together to share strategic information, assist in overcoming institutional barriers and develop a strategic plan for the summer of 2016.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.37
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94090.pdf

MM19.38 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from the Development at 333 Bloor St. E., 1 Mt Pleasant Rd., 575 and 577 Jarvis St. to Fund the creation and installation of a Two Plaques Commemorating the Life and Work of Joseph Bloor - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the approved 2016 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto by $24,800.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 333 Bloor Street East, 1 Mount Pleasant Road and 575 and 577 Jarvis Street (Source Account: XR3026-3700137), for the production and installation of two plaques commemorating the life and work of Joseph Bloor at 117 Bloor Street East. (cost centre HG0001/4995).

Summary

In spite of his significance and the popularity of his name, Joseph Bloor has not been commemorated in the City of Toronto. For the past 15 years, Heritage Toronto has been working with a range of stakeholders to get this oversight rectified; in particular, historian Steve Otto, ERA architects, and local landowner and property manager St Andrew's Church and Colliers International.

 

The namesake of Bloor Street, Joseph Bloor was an influential local brewer and land developer. Born in Staffordshire, England, he emigrated with his wife, Sarah Lees, and their three children to York (now Toronto) in 1819. There he farmed, then kept an inn. Between 1827 and 1831, Bloor acquired just under 30 acres along the north side of present-day Bloor Street between Yonge and Sherbourne Streets. Here he established a home and, in the Rosedale Valley, a brewery.  The latter was sold in 1843, a few years after Bloor’s conversion to Methodism which frowned on intemperate drinking. In 1854, the concession road that separated Toronto from Yorkville was renamed Bloor Street. He died in Toronto in a house at today's 121 Bloor Street East in 1862.

 

In 2000, a stone marker commemorating Joseph Bloor's house was found in outdoor storage and poor condition. It was taken into the protective custody of the now-dissolved Toronto Historical Board and is now under the care of Museum Services.

 

The installation will consist of a replica of the stone marker (which is too fragile to be installed outdoor again) accompanied by a Heritage Toronto commemorative plaque providing historical context and biographical elements about Joseph Bloor.

 

Heritage interpretation about Joseph Bloor is sorely needed and long overdue. Furthermore, the 155th anniversary of Joseph Bloor's death is coming up in August 2017. Heritage Toronto and its partners would like to organize an unveiling ceremony in time to celebrate this anniversary.

 

Funds have been secured through Sections 37 benefits from the development at 333 Bloor Street East, 1 Mount Pleasant Road and 575 and 577 Jarvis Street that included funding of $900,000 to achieve heritage objectives in the vicinity of the lands.  Of the original contribution and accrued interest there remains approximately $689,764 for heritage objectives that have not been spent or remain uncommitted.

 

This Motion seeks authorization to amend the 2016 Operating Budget of Heritage Toronto to fund the creation and installation of two plaques commemorating the life and work of Joseph Bloor at 117 Bloor Street East.  Heritage Toronto had estimated the entire project to cost $24,800.

 

As Heritage Toronto is a directly funded City agency and not considered an "outside party", no undertaking is required to be signed by Heritage Toronto governing the use of the funds and financial reporting.

 

This Motion is urgent as the 155th anniversary of Joseph Bloor’s passing is coming in the near future, and there is a desire to unveil the plaque as part of a celebration of his life.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.38
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94058.pdf

MM19.39 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Fund from the Development at 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street for Upgrades to the Street Lighting at Ancroft Place by Toronto Hydro - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1. City Council increase the approved 2016 Capital Budget for Transportation Services by $18,984.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by the Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street) (source account: XR3026-3700736), to fund improvements by Toronto Hydro to the street lighting at Ancroft Place (cost centre: CTP416-02, Neighbourhood Improvements).

 

2. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to implement this expenditure and initiate this project through the issuance of a Purchase Order to Toronto Hydro and the payment of Toronto Hydro's invoice for the work.

Summary

Ancroft Place has been identified as a residential street lacking illumination by standard Toronto Hydro luminaries. The road does not meet regular standards for such lighting to be installed, but the condition has been identified as a safety risk by local residents. As such, implementation through external funding has been identified as the critical path to resolving the deficiency.

 

The cost quoted by Toronto Hydro for providing and installing the new and upgraded luminaries is $18,984.00.  

 

Section 37 funds in the amount of $100,000 have been secured and received in the development at 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street towards streetscape improvements in the vicinity of the Sherbourne property. The Section 37 funds for local streetscape improvements can be used for lighting improvements.

 

Toronto Hydro needs a City Purchase Order to initiate the project, and will then invoice the City for the cost of the Ancroft Place lighting upgrades. This Motion proposes to provide a total of $18,984.00 to Transportation Services to initiate City Purchase Order for the project and pay Toronto Hydro for the work to be done.

 

This motion is urgent so that the funds can be transferred in time to schedule this work can be completed over the Summer of 2016.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.39
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94059.pdf

MM19.40 - Accountability and Consumer Protection for Pre-Construction Condo and Townhouse Buyers - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate

Recommendations

 Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Province of Ontario to review the Planning Act, the Condominium Act (1998), the Ontario New Home Warranties Plan Act, the Building Code Act (1992), and any other relevant legislation with a view to considering whether any amendments should be made to better promote consumer protection for prospective condominium and townhouse purchasers.

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager and the Interim City Solicitor to consider whether there are any steps that the City could take within its existing jurisdiction that would better promote consumer protection for prospective condominium and townhouse purchasers, and if so, report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on any such steps.

 

3.  City Council express its concern and support for the purchasers of the Leslieville Urbancorp condominiums who have been given numerous move-in dates for their properties.

Summary

As Toronto's development boom continues, with more and more condo and in-fill development applications before Council all the time, there is more opportunity for problems with the development process to arise. Pre-construction sales are very routine, with sales centres often open and paperwork signed before community consultations are held or the development is approved by Council.

 

While most of these transactions are executed in good faith, when problems arise in the construction of the new units, there is not always an ability to mitigate their potential effects on purchasers.

 

Recently there has been a highly publicized incident involving in-fill townhouses in which purchasers were experiencing many delays in their closing and move-in dates. Understandably, these purchasers expected their governments to be of assistance but were disappointed to find that there are no provincial laws protecting purchasers in these circumstances. While my Office was able to assist in facilitating meetings with purchasers and Tarion, the City had no power to compel the developer to provide concrete information to the purchasers.

 

News reports indicate purchasers across Toronto faced similar challenges. The City and Province must work together to, where possible, establish appropriate legislation to provide for better consumer protection for purchasers.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.40
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94074.pdf

MM19.41 - Request the Province of Ontario to Suspend Liquor Licenses for Establishments with Illegal Handguns - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council pass a resolution asking the Province of Ontario to legislate a suspension of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission liquor licence for establishments where the Toronto Police Service has evidence of multiple gun-related offences occurring on the premises.

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager in consultation with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, the Toronto Police Service, Toronto Fire, Public Health, among other government agencies to report back to the appropriate Committee on proactive enforcement measures that can be utilized under the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to deter illegal criminal activity by dealing with it in a more comprehensive, cohesive and co-ordinated way, to address issues where crime is known or is suspected to be taking place, similar to the action that was applied by Municipal Licensing and Standards when they issued the temporary suspension of the business licence at Cloud 9 Café at 1530 Danforth Avenue.

Summary

Several recent occurrences at licensed establishments in the City of Toronto have accentuated the demand for tougher liquor licensing rules and regulations, especially in respect to incidents that involve an illegal firearm.

 

The City of Toronto is committed to decreasing the availability of handguns in our City and has enacted measures, including amending the Toronto Land Use Zoning By-Law to restrict the use of guns and gun-associated activities.  Deterring gun-related offences is a complex plan and involves multiple stakeholders including governments, police services, community agencies, businesses and residents working collectively.

 

The objective is to remain dedicated to delivering police services in partnership with our community to keep Toronto the best and safest place to be, although at times, it requires assistance from Toronto City Council and the Province of Ontario, in order to mitigate the impacts of criminal activity impacting our communities.  Even though Toronto Police Service report an overall decline in crime statistics, crimes involving handguns continue to escalate.

 

Firearm violence, in particular handgun violence, continues to represent a significant public health and safety threat to Torontonians. Families and communities throughout the City of Toronto have been witness to, and affected by, the dramatic increase in gun related violence and homicides involving guns this year. The escalation of gun violence and homicides involving guns in Toronto has become a crisis in Canada’s largest city that requires immediate action.

 

Furthermore, gang violence is also a significant problem in our City. Our streets are too often witness to gang violence. Handguns were used more often in gang-related homicides than in any other type of homicide. Whether recruited into a criminal organization or killed as victims of gang violence, too many of our young people have their lives potentially destroyed by criminal gangs.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.41
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94089.pdf

MM19.42 - Appointment of Director and Deputy Chief Building Official - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Chin Lee

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate

Bill 584 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Chin Lee, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint Diane Elizabeth Damiano as Deputy Chief Building Official for the City of Toronto, with all the powers and duties of the Chief Building Official within the district of the City of Toronto assigned by the Chief Building Official.

 

2. City Council authorize and direct appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to this Motion including the introduction in Council of any necessary bills.

Summary

The purpose of this Motion is to seek City Council's authority to appoint Diane Elizabeth Damiano as the Director and Deputy Chief Building Official effective as soon as possible.

 

This Motion is urgent as the Director and Deputy Chief Building Official appointment is required as soon as possible to meet City needs.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.42
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94092.pdf

MM19.43 - Amendment to TE13.4 - Alteration to Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 129 St. Clair Avenue West - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Chin Lee

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Chin Lee, recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend its decision on Item TE13.4 by amending Part 1.d. to add the phrase ", and excluding any permits for the demolition and staging work” between the words “excavation” and “on”, so that Part 1.d. now reads as follows:

 

d. Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, including a permit for alteration of any structure on the subject property, and including any permit for shoring or excavation, and excluding any permits for the demolition and staging work on the subject property, or any portion of such property:

 

Summary

At its meeting on April 10, 2012, City Council adopted Item TE13.3 approving the Zoning Amendment application for 129 St. Clair Avenue West. Concurrent with the zoning approval being considered by Council was the consideration of the alteration to the designated heritage building, pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act Item TE13.4.  The Council decision required that a number of conditions be satisfied prior to the issuance of any heritage alteration permit.  The applicant has requested that this be amended to allow them to move ahead with the demolition of the southern portion of the building which is permitted to be demolished in the approved conservation plan.

 

The reason for the requested change in the conditions is to allow the applicant to meet a construction deadline so that the work on the overall site can continue without a break and prolonging the construction adjacent to an established neighbourhood.  The applicant's Site Plan application has been submitted and is under review by City staff. The City's interests are being secured through other means, including a Heritage Easement Agreement, which has been executed by the applicant and has been registered on title since December 11, 2015.  The Heritage Easement Agreement includes provisions allowing for a similar exemption for any demolition permits and staging work as proposed in this Motion.

 

This Motion is deemed urgent as the applicant needs to continue work on the Site and ensure that the development is delivered quickly to reduce the amount of time the neighbours are adjacent to the construction.

Background Information

Member Motion MM19.43
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-94121.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 19

BL19.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact General Bills and Confirming Bills.

 

 

Background Information

(June 16, 2016) Consolidated By-law Index for June 7, 8 and 9, 2016 City Council meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-94434.htm
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council