City Council

Meeting No.:
12
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Wednesday, February 3, 2016

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
clerk@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed. The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

 

Members of Council and Staff: Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended. The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements: If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

January 29, 2016


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

Routine Matters - Meeting 12

RM12.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All
Attention
Council voted to consider the following items at specific times:

On Wednesday, February 3, 2016:
First item, Mayor's Key Item: LS9.4 - Calgary Injunction Decision regarding Unlicensed Ground Transportation Providers

On Thursday, February 4, 2016:
First item: CC12.6 - Office of the Integrity Commissioner - Report on Activity July 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015 - Council has requested a presentaiton from the Integrity Commissioner on this item

First item after Member Motions: CC12.2 - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension - Schedule and Budget Reset

Summary

 

• O Canada
• Moment of Silence
• Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Dr. Mark Ernsting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90373.pdf
Condolence Motion for George Keddy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90210.pdf
Condolence Motion for Theo Lawrence
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90010.pdf
Condolence Motion for Joseph Lippert
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90011.pdf
Condolence Motion for Robert Kenneth (Bob) Thomson
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90012.pdf

RM12.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on December 9 and 10, 2015.

RM12.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 11 on January 28, 2016

Submitted by Mayor John Tory, Chair

 

Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 9 on January 25, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair

 

Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 9 on January 27, 2016

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

 

Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 9 on January 15, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 9 on January 4, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Licensing and Standards Committee from Meeting 9 on January 22, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Cesar Palacio, Chair

 

Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 9 on January 15, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 9 on January 20, 2016

Submitted by Councillor David Shiner, Chair

 

Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 10 on January 21, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Jaye Robinson, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 11 on January 19, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 11 on January 19, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 11 on January 19, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Chin Lee, Chair

 

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 13 on January 19, 2016

Submitted by Councillor Mike Layton, Chair

 

New Business submitted by City Officials 

RM12.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM12.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

RM12.6 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

Order Paper February 3, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90018.pdf
Order Paper February 4, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90197.pdf

Administrative Inquiry - Meeting 12

IA12.1 - To Clarify Communication between the Province of Ontario and Representatives of the City of Toronto about the Potential Sale of a portion of Toronto Hydro

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All
Attention
The City Manager has submitted an Answer to this Inquiry (IA12.1a)

Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry, without debate.

Summary

Councillor Gord Perks has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

"I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry, under Municipal Code S27-61, to obtain clarification and information.

 

Recent press reports give a confusing picture of whether there have been conversations about the potential sale of a portion of Toronto Hydro. I request a description of times, dates, participants, and the substance of any communications or meetings between the Province of Ontario and representatives of the City Of Toronto during this term of Council.

 

I look forward to your timely response at the next meeting of City Council."

Background Information

(January 14, 2016) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 14, Parkdale High-Park to clarify communication between the Province of Ontario and representatives of the City of Toronto about the potential sale of a portion of Toronto Hydro (IA12.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-88592.pdf
(January 22, 2016) Answer to Administrative Inquiry from the City Manager (IA12.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-88593.pdf

Executive Committee - Meeting 11

EX11.1 - Ralph Thornton Community Centre Constitution and Procedure By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the Constitution and Procedure By-law of Ralph Thornton Community Centre Board of Management in Attachment 1 to the report (January 14, 2016) from the City Manager as requested by its Board of Management.

Origin

(January 14, 2016) Report from the City Manager

Summary

The Board of Management and membership of Ralph Thornton Community Centre (RTCC) approved in principle its revised Constitution and Procedure By-law in consultation with City staff, and submitted it to the City for final approval by City Council. This report recommends that City Council approve the RTCC Constitution and Procedure By-law submitted by their board, so that the revised by-law is in place for the newly appointed board. City Council policy currently requires that agencies seek Council approval of by-laws governing the internal conduct of the business and affairs of City agencies, which includes their procedure by-laws.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 14, 2016) Report from the City Manager on Ralph Thornton Community Centre Constitution and Procedure By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87756.pdf
Attachment 1 - Ralph Thornton Community Centre Constitution and Procedure By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87758.pdf

EX11.6 - Administrative Amendments to Reserve Fund Accounts - 2015

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 128 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Solid Waste Debt Reserve Fund' in Schedule 8 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227,   Reserves and Reserve Funds ("Chapter 227") the purpose of which is to hold funds for contribution to sinking funds once debentures have been issued, with criteria as set out in Appendix 1 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

2.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Tree Canopy Reserve Fund' in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to foster and maintain the tree canopy with criteria as set out in Appendix 2 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, with an initial balance of $1 million, resulting from the approved transfer from the Waste Water Stabilization Reserve (XQ1004).

 

3. City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Forestry Capital Replacement' in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to receive the portion of the Forestry user fees for capital replacement, with criteria as set out in Appendix 3 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

4.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Parks Capital Replacement' in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to receive the portion of the Parks user fees for capital replacement, with criteria as set out in Appendix 4 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

5.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Recreation Capital Replacement' in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to receive the portion of the Recreation and Community Recreation user fees for capital replacement, with criteria as set out in Appendix 5 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

6.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Donated Assets PF&R Maintenance Reserve Fund' in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to accumulate a portion (10 percent) of the value of donations to Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PF&R) to fund asset replacement and/or major improvements, with criteria as set out in Appendix 6 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

7.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Outdoor Ice Contingency Reserve Fund' in Schedule 9 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to accumulate funds to support the extension of the artificial ice season, with criteria as set out in Appendix 7 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

8.  City Council establish an obligatory reserve fund account named the 'Development Charges Reserve Fund – Transit - SSE' in Schedule 11 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to provide funding for the Scarborough Subway Extension, with criteria as set out in Appendix 8 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

9.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Paver Maintenance Reserve Fund' in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to provide funding for the replacement or repair of street pavers, with criteria as set out in Appendix 9 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

10.  City Council establish an obligatory reserve fund account named the 'Management of Contaminated Lands Reserve Fund' in Schedule 14 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to fund the management, inspection and maintenance of lands deemed contaminated and subject to Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) Certificates of Property Use Requirements or Director's Orders and/or Technical Standards and Safety Authority (TSSA) requirements, with criteria as set out in Appendix 10 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

11.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'Exhibition Place Green Space Renewal Reserve Fund' in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to hold funds for the re-conversion of the temporary parking to functional green space on the baseball diamond site at Exhibition Place, with criteria as set out in Appendix 11 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

12.  City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account named the 'TTC Benefits Liability Reserve Fund in Schedule 7 of Chapter  227,  the purpose of which is to ensure funding for the Toronto Transit Commission's (TTC) long-term liabilities for post-retirement medical and dental benefits, with criteria as set out in Appendix 12 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

13.  City Council amend the purpose of the 'Green Lane' account within the Solid Waste Management Reserve Fund Group in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, to provide funding for the development and operation of the Green Lane Landfill site, with no other changes to the criteria for the account.

 

14.  City Council: 

 

a.  Transfer the balances in the obligatory reserve fund accounts currently in the Development Charges 2004 Reserve Fund Group in Schedule 11 of Chapter 227, to the corresponding obligatory reserve fund accounts currently in the Development Charges 2009 Reserve Fund Group in Schedule 11 of Chapter 227, as set out in Section 3a to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer;

 

b. Amend the names of the obligatory reserve fund accounts currently in the Development Charges 2009 Reserve Fund Group and the Group itself in Schedule 11 of Chapter 227 to remove the year identifier but to keep the existing criteria; and,

 

c.  Close and delete from Chapter 227 the Development Charges 2004 Reserve Fund Group and all the reserve fund accounts within. 

 

15.  City Council close and delete the following accounts from Chapter 227, because they have zero balances:

 

Zero Balances

Reserve Accounts

Beneficial Program

Schedule

Soccer Stadium Capital Maintenance Reserve Fund

Exhibition Place

15

Lakeshore Lions Arena Reserve Fund

 

Lakeshore Lions Arena

 

15

 

16.  City Council amend Chapter 227 in accordance with Recommendations 1 to 15.

 

17.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bills in Council.

Origin

(January 13, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report seeks Council approval to implement a number of housekeeping amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds.  These amendments include establishing new reserve funds, refining criteria of existing accounts, merging development charges accounts, and deleting accounts which are no longer required.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 13, 2016) Report and Appendices 1 to 12 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Administrative Amendments to Reserve Fund Accounts - 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87760.pdf

EX11.7 - Development Charges Act Changes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EX7.11.2 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to require applicants seeking conditional below-grade permits to enter into a Development Charges Deferral Agreement in accordance with the general terms and conditions in Appendix 1 to the report (January 14, 2016) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and in a form acceptable to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council urge the Province to direct the Minister of Transportation to implement uniform region-wide development charges for GO Transit and Metrolinx Capital Expansion projects.

 

3. City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report on the outcome of the request in Recommendation 2 above, to the same meeting as the SmartTrack report which is currently targeted for June 2016.

 

4. City Council direct and authorize the appropriate City staff to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

 

Origin

(January 14, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The Province enacted Bill 73, the Smart Growth for Our Communities Act, 2015 on December 3, 2015, to amend the Development Charges Act, 1997 (the "DCA") and the Planning Act and filed amendments to the related regulation (Ontario Regulation 428/15) on December 17, 2015. The amended legislation came into effect on January 1, 2016. This report provides Council with an assessment of the legislative and regulatory amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997. The changes to the Planning Act will be the subject of a future report from the Chief Planner to Planning and Growth Management Committee.

 

The primary effect of the new legislation is to add transit to the list of services not subject to the mandatory 10 percent discount, permit the use of a forward-looking level of service for transit development charge calculations, and allow recoveries for waste diversion. These changes partially respond to Council's long-standing requests for amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997 and will allow development charges to fund a higher proportion of growth-related infrastructure costs.

 

However, amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997 also alter the timing of payment of development charges to the first building permit for multi-permit developments (which include excavation/shoring or foundation permits) and prescribe extensive reporting requirements under the calculation methodology for transit which could have a significant negative impact on the City.

 

Most of the amendments to the Development Charges Act, 1997 are not effective until the City's development charges by-law is updated or renewed. However, the changes to the timing of calculation and payment of development charges are effective immediately and take precedence over the City's existing by-law.  To bridge the interval until the next anticipated by-law renewal (2017/2018), staff recommends that the Chief Building Official be authorized to require applicants seeking conditional below-grade building permits to enter into a Development Charges Deferral Agreement. Development charges would then become payable with the issuance of the first above-grade permit.

 

These were the first major changes to the Development Charges Act, 1997 since 1997 when, under a different government and different economic circumstances, the Act was amended to restrict municipal cost recovery.  Accordingly, municipal officials had hoped that the exhaustive consultation over the summer of 2015 would achieve broader improvements in support of the principle of growth paying for growth.

 

This report has been prepared in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Chief Building Official who concur with the recommendations.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 14, 2016) Report and Appendix 1 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Development Charges Act Changes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87734.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(January 26, 2016) Letter from Steve Deveaux, Chair, Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) (EX.Supp.EX11.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-58605.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(February 2, 2016) Letter from Jeremy Wedgbury, President, NAIOP Greater Toronto Chapter, Commericial Real Estate Development Association (CC.New.EX11.7.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58780.pdf

EX11.9 - Revised Community Use at Proposed Basketball Training Facility

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize amendments to the lease to be entered into with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. to reduce the available hours of community use at the Basketball Training Facility at Exhibition Place to 1,235 annually and to reflect new dates for finalizing the lease and satisfying related conditions.

 

2.  City Council rescind its decision to declare a Municipal Capital Facility at Exhibition Place, 2 Strachan Avenue, for a basketball training facility, and repeal By-law 966-2014 enacted and passed on August 28, 2014.

Origin

(January 14, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report recommends that the terms of the lease described in a Letter of Intent with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. ("MLSE"), adopted by Council at its meeting of August 25-28, 2014 be amended to reduce the requirement for community use hours at the proposed Basketball Training Facility at Exhibition Place and that the related Municipal Capital Facility By-Law be rescinded so that the facility becomes fully taxable.

 

Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. has indicated that the reduction in the hours of community use at the Basketball Training Facility will be offset by new community access time being made available at the new Youth Centre for Sports Development being created by Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. in the Toronto Community Housing Corporation building at 261 Jarvis Street.  Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Ltd. agrees that with the reduction in community use, the Basketball Training Facility will no longer qualify as a Municipal Capital Facility, and thereby will be liable for development charges and full property taxation.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 14, 2016) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Revised Community Use at Proposed Basketball Training Facility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87780.pdf

EX11.11 - City Representation on the Boards/Committees which are the Administrators of the Pension Plans Sponsored by the City

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bills 130, 131, 133 and 134 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the board compositions of the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan, the Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund Pension Plan, the Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund Pension Plan and the Toronto Civic Employees' Pension and Benefit Plan by removing Council Members and replacing them with City Officials, as voting members, so that the composition of these boards will be as follows:

 

a.  Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan

                       

              - 1 citizen appointed by Council as chair

              - 3 Member representatives elected by Plan members

              - City Manager designate

              - Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer designate

              - City Treasurer

 

b.  Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund

 

              - 1 citizen appointed by Council as chair

              - 3 Member representatives elected by Plan members

              - City Manager designate

              - Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer designate

              - City Treasurer

 

              c.  Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund

 

- 1 citizen appointed by Council (traditionally appointed as chair by the Committee)

- 3 Member representatives elected by Plan members

- City Manager designate

- Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer designate

- City Treasurer

 

              d. Toronto Civic Employees' Pension and Benefit Plan

 

- 1 citizen appointed by Council (traditionally appointed as chair by the Committee)

            - 3 Member representatives elected by Plan members

            - City Manager designate

            - Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer designate

            - City Treasurer

 

2.  City Council rescind the Council Member appointments to the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan, the Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund pension plan, the Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund pension plan and the Toronto Civic Employees' Pension and Benefit Plan.

 

3.  City Council amend the following by-laws governing the pension plans accordingly, including any necessary changes to voting requirements and quorum:

 

a.  Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan (By-law No. 15-92 of the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, as amended to date);

 

b.  The Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund pension plan (By-law No. 181-81 of the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto, as amended to date) ;

 

c.  Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund pension plan (By-law No.   10649 of the former City of Toronto, as amended to date); and

 

d.  Toronto Civic Employees' Pension and Benefit Plan (By-law No. 380-74 of the former City of Toronto, as amended to date).

Origin

(January 14, 2016) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend a modification to City representation on the Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan, the Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund, The Benefit Fund Committee of the Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund, and the Toronto Civic Employees' Pension Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 14, 2016) Report from the Treasurer on City Representation on the Boards/Committees which are the Administrators of the Pension Plans Sponsored by the City
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87733.pdf

EX11.13 - Official Plan Amendment for Exhibition Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to determine the appropriate actions and conditions necessary to amend the Official Plan for the buildings within the lands designated Parks/Open Space on the Exhibition Place grounds to permit leases in excess of twenty-one years.

 

2.  City Council, consistent with the August 25, 2014 City Council decision respecting "A Coordinated Planning Approach for Ontario Place and Exhibition Place [EX44.4]":

 

a. Request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, and local Councillors, to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee by the end of the second quarter of 2016 on the development of an appropriate Official Plan Amendment for the Exhibition Place / Ontario Place precinct with the objective of protecting and preserving heritage properties, public space, event accommodation and public enjoyment of this site, among other considerations.

 

b. Request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consult with the Ontario Government to develop joint planning process and public consultation that incorporates Ontario Place into the planning exercise.

Origin

(September 4, 2015) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place

Summary

This report requests City Council to instruct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to commence the process for an Official Plan Amendment with respect to all leased buildings within that part of the Exhibition Place site designated as Parks/Open Space to permit the granting of leases of those buildings for terms in excess of 21 years.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 4, 2015) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place on Official Plan Amendment for Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87168.pdf

Speakers

Brian Ashton, President, Canadian National Exhibition Association
Connie Dejak, Vice Chair, Exhibition Place Board of Governors
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Jim Karygiannis

Communications (Committee)

(September 17, 2015) E-mail from Virginia Ludy, General Manager, Canadian National Exhibition (EX.Main.EX11.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-57928.pdf
(September 18, 2015) E-mail from Officials from Shows and Events, Canadian National Exhibition, submitting a jointly signed letter (EX.Main.EX11.13.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-57925.pdf
(September 20, 2015) E-mail from Ric Amis (EX.Main.EX11.13.3)
(September 21, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton and Councillor Gord Perks (EX.Main.EX11.13.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-57924.pdf
(September 1, 2015) E-mail from Nick Di Donato, President and CEO, Liberty Entertainment Group (EX.Main.EX11.13.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-57926.pdf
(January 12, 2016) E-mail from Lorna Tomassoni (EX.Supp.EX11.13.6)
(January 13, 2016) E-mail from Lorna Tomassoni (EX.Supp.EX11.13.7)
(January 25, 2016) E-mail from Ralph Daley (EX.Supp.EX11.13.8)
(January 25, 2016) E-mail from Kathy Sutton (EX.Supp.EX11.13.9)
(January 26, 2016) E-mail from Ric Amis (EX.Supp.EX11.13.10)
(January 28, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes (EX.New.EX11.13.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/comm/communicationfile-58623.pdf
(January 28, 2016) Submission from Ric Amis (EX.New.EX11.13.12)

EX11.14 - City of Toronto Lease - 275 Manitoba Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
14 - Parkdale-High Park, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve a lease with City of Toronto / Parks, Forestry and Recreation for the use of 275 Manitoba Drive for a 10-year term, based on the terms and conditions outlined in the report (December 18, 2015) from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, and any other terms that may be required by the Chief Executive Officer and City Solicitor.

Origin

(December 18, 2015) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place

Summary

This report recommends a lease with the City of Toronto (City) for Parks Forestry and Recreation (PF&R) use of the 275 Manitoba Drive for a 10-year term commencing January 1, 2016 on the terms and conditions outlined in this report.  Parks Forestry and Recreation have maintained work trailer locations on Exhibition Place grounds for numerous years and continue to deliver all turf and horticulture maintenance at Exhibition Place.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 18, 2015) Report and Appendix A from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place on City of Toronto Lease - 275 Manitoba Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87160.pdf

EX11.15 - E-Book Advocacy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Department of Canadian Heritage and Industry Canada to investigate current e-book pricing practices of multinational publishers as part of any upcoming statutory review of the Copyright Act.

Origin

(December 21, 2015) Letter from the City Librarian

Summary

The Toronto Public Library Board, at its meeting on November 23, 2015, adopted the following motion in considering the E-Book Advocacy report (November 23, 2015) from the City Librarian.

 

It is recommended that the Toronto Public Library Board:


1. seeks Toronto City Council’s endorsement of a motion, requesting the Department of Canadian Heritage and Industry Canada to investigate current e-book pricing practices of multinational publishers as part of any upcoming statutory review of the Copyright Act; and


2. authorizes and directs staff to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

 

Attached is a copy of the report adopted by the Library Board at the November 23, 2015 meeting for Executive Committee consideration.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 21, 2015) Letter from the City Librarian on E-Book Advocacy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87180.pdf
(November 23, 2015) Report from the City Librarian on E-Book Advocacy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87181.pdf

Declared Interests (Committee)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor James Pasternak - as it relates to the Toronto Public Library, as his wife works for the Toronto Public Library.

EX11.16 - Toronto Public Library Revised Records Retention Schedule

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 120 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the revised records retention schedules in Attachment 1 to the report (December 14, 2015) from the City Librarian.

Origin

(December 21, 2015) Letter from the City Librarian

Summary

The Toronto Public Library Board, at its meeting on December 14, 2015, adopted by consent the following motion in considering the Revised Records Retention Schedule report:

 

It is recommended that the Toronto Public Library Board:

 

1. approves the revised records retention schedules as reflected in Attachment 1; and


2. presents the revised records retention schedules to the Toronto City Council, through the Executive Committee, for approval.

 

Attached is a copy of the report adopted by the Library Board at the December 14, 2015 meeting for Executive Committee consideration.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 21, 2015) Letter from the City Librarian on Revised Records Retention Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87182.pdf
(December 14, 2015) Report from the City Librarian on Toronto Public Library Revised Records Retention Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87183.pdf
Attachment 1 - Revised Toronto Public Library Records Retention Schedules
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87184.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Municipal Code, Section 219 Article III
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87185.pdf
Attachment 3 - Summary List of Records Series Deleted/Consolidated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87186.pdf
Attachment 4 - Summary List of Records Series Added
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87187.pdf

Declared Interests (Committee)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor James Pasternak - as it relates to the Toronto Public Library, as his wife works for the Toronto Public Library.

EX11.17 - Toronto Transit Commission - 2015 In-Year Technical Adjustment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the technical budget adjustments as outlined in Appendix A to the report (December 16, 2015) from the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to reflect offsetting project deferrals and accelerations of $77.9 million in the approved 2015 Toronto Transit Commission Capital Budget to/from future year cash flow commitments (including related funding impacts) noting that there is no impact to project approvals or to City debt.

 

2. City Council approve 2015 funding source adjustments outlined in Appendix A to the report (December 16, 2015) from the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, including an increase of $4.8 million in Provincial Gas Tax Funding (PGT) Reserve Funds XR3018, offset by a $4.8 million decrease in the Toronto Transit Commission Depreciation.

Origin

(December 21, 2015) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission

Summary

At its meeting on Wednesday, December 16, 2015 the Toronto Transit Commission Board considered the report (December 16, 2015) from the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, entitled "2015 In-Year Technical Adjustment".

 

The Board approved the recommendations in the staff report, as follows:

 

"It is recommended that the Board:

 

1.  approve the technical budget adjustments as outlined in Appendix A to reflect offsetting project deferrals and accelerations of $77.9 million in the approved 2015 Toronto Transit Commission Capital Budget to/from future year cash flow commitments (including related funding impacts) noting that there is no impact to project approvals or to City debt.

 

2. approve 2015 funding source adjustments outlined in Appendix A including an increase of $4.8 million in Provincial Gas Tax Funding (PGT) Reserve Funds XR3018, offset by a $4.8 million decrease in the Toronto Transit Commission Depreciation.

 

3. forward this report to the City of Toronto for Council approval".

 

The foregoing is submitted to the City of Toronto Executive Committee for Council approval.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 21, 2015) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer on 2015 In-Year Technical Adjustment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87188.pdf
(December 16, 2015) Report and Appendix A from the Chief Executive Officer on 2015 Capital Budget In-Year Technical Adjustment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-87189.pdf

Board of Health - Meeting 9

HL9.3 - Healthy People First: Opportunities and Risks in Health System Transformation in Ontario

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Deputy City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (HL9.3a for information)

Board Recommendations

The Board of Health recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care to ensure a continued strong role for public health in keeping people healthy by:

 

a.  Maintaining independent governance of the local public health sector by boards of health;

 

b.  Strengthening comprehensive provincial standards for public health through the current review of the Ontario Public Health Standards, especially for healthy public policy and other programs that keep people healthy;

 

c.  Ensuring that Public Health Units continue to be directly funded by the province. 

 

2.  City Council request the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care to mandate a formal relationship between Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) and senior representatives of the healthcare, municipal, education, social service and voluntary sectors as well as the Medical Officer of Health to support population health planning and service coordination in order to improve health equity and address social determinants of health;

 

3.  City Council request the Minister of Health and Long Term Care to provide the necessary resources to Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) and Boards of Health to support collaboration on population health planning of health services;

 

4.  City Council request the Minister of Health and Long Term Care to adjust Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) boundaries to create geographic alignment with the boundaries of municipalities, school boards, and public health units, including creating one LHIN for the City of Toronto; and

 

5.  City Council request the Minister of Health and Long Term Care to create transparent accountability indicators and targets for Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) which include population health and health equity.

Board Decision Advice and Other Information

The Board of Health:

 

1.  Requested the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care to ensure a continued strong role for public health in keeping people healthy by:

 

a.  Maintaining independent governance of the local public health sector by boards of health;

 

b.  Strengthening comprehensive provincial standards for public health through the current review of the Ontario Public Health Standards, especially for healthy public policy and other programs that keep people healthy;

 

c.  Ensuring that Public Health Units continue to be directly funded by the province. 

 

2.  Requested the Minister of Health and Long-Term Care to mandate a formal relationship between Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) and senior representatives of the healthcare, municipal, education, social service and voluntary sectors as well as the Medical Officer of Health to support population health planning and service coordination in order to improve health equity and address social determinants of health;

 

3.  Requested the Minister of Health and Long Term Care to provide the necessary resources to Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) and Boards of Health to support collaboration on population health planning of health services;

 

4.  Requested the Minister of Health and Long Term Care to adjust Local Health Integration Network (LHIN) boundaries to create geographic alignment with the boundaries of municipalities, school boards, and public health units, including creating one LHIN for the City of Toronto;

 

5.  Requested the Minister of Health and Long Term Care to create transparent accountability indicators and targets for Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) which include population health and health equity;

 

6.  Forwarded Recommendations 1 to 5 of the Report (January 11, 2016) from the Medical Officer of Health, to City Council for adoption; and

 

7.  Forwarded the report (January 11, 2016) from the Medical Officer of Health to the Association of Local Public Health Agencies, the Council of Ontario Medical Officers of Health, the Ontario Public Health Association, the Association of Municipalities of Ontario, the Toronto City Manager, all 14 Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs), the 36 Ontario boards of health, the Toronto School Boards, and Dalla Lana Faculty of Public Health, University of Toronto.

Origin

(January 11, 2016) Report from the Medical Officer of Health

Summary

The Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) released Patients First: A proposal to strengthen patient-centred health care in Ontario in December 2015 with the goal of addressing structural issues in the health care system that create inequities (Attachment 1).  The Patients First discussion paper proposes expanding the role of the Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) to include funding and accountability for public health.

 

The experience of other Canadian provinces with formal integration of public health and the larger health system suggests that opportunities for system improvement have often not been realized, and unintended risks to public health have arisen.  This report reviews the implications of the MOHLTC proposals and recommends a response from the Board of Health (BOH) with particular attention to proposals with implications for local public health.

 

Public health plays a key role in population health and the sustainability of the health system by keeping people healthy. To minimize the risk of proposed changes compromising these contributions, the Medical Officer of Health (MOH) recommends that the BOH endorse maintaining independent governance of public health by local boards of health, protected and transparent funding for public health, and strengthened Ontario Public Health Standards.

 

Patients First also calls for local public health to play a formal role in planning of health care services to improve population health and health equity. Because health inequities are grounded in social determinants of health outside the health care system, the system must partner with non-health sectors beyond public health to realize this goal.  The MOH recommends that the MOHLTC mandate formal local relationships between LHINs and the municipal, education, social service and voluntary sectors as well as public health.  Realignment of LHIN boundaries with the other sectors is necessary to enable intersectoral collaboration.

Background Information (Board)

(January 11, 2016) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on Healthy People First: Opportunities and Risks in Health System Transformation in Ontario
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-88525.pdf
(December 17, 2015) Attachment 1: Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. (2015). Patients first: A proposal to strengthen patient-centred health care in Ontario. Discussion Paper December, 2015.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-88526.pdf
Attachment 2: The Impacts on the Public Health Function with Integration with Regionalized Healthcare Systems. Moloughney, B. (2016)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-88527.pdf
(January 11, 2016) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on The Future of Public Health in Ontario - Opportunities and Risks - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-87293.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(February 2, 2016) Supplementary report from the Deputy City Manager on Board of Health Recommendations Regarding the Healthy People First Health System Transformation (HL9.3a) - Revised
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-90085.pdf

Speakers

Dr. Brent Moloughney, BWM Health Consultants
Dr. Kwame McKenzie, Chief Executive Officer, Wellesley Institute

Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 9

CD9.1 - A New Home for Salvation Army HOPE Shelter

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Communications CD9.1.36 to CD9.1.38 have been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the location of a new 80 bed men's emergency shelter to be operated by the Salvation Army at 29 Leslie Street in Ward 32 in accordance with the requirement of the Municipal Shelter By-law 138-2003.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to include the following conditions, with respect to the men's emergency shelter at 29 Leslie Street, in the operating agreement with the service provider:

 

a. That a Community Liaison Committee be established to meet following Council approval of the facility and the Committee be maintained as long as the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with Councillors for Wards 30 and 32, consider it is required by the community.  Representatives of the following groups will be invited to participate:

 

1. Residents of Wards 30 and 32

2. City staff, including staff from Parks, Forestry and Recreation

3. The Salvation Army

4. Councillors for Wards 30 and 32

5. Toronto Police Service

6. Leslieville BIA

7. South Riverdale Community Health Centre

8. Leslieville Community Coalition

9. Leslieville Farmers' Market

10. Heritage Nursing Home

11. Avondale Retirement Home

12. Marigold Condominium

13. St. Joseph's Seniors Citizens Apartments

14. Local School Board Trustees

15. Local School Board Superintendents

16. Businesses in the immediate area

17. HOPE Shelter Residents.

 

b. That an independent Community Liaison worker be retained to communicate with local residents and organize and facilitate the Community Liaison Committee.

 

c. That Terms of Reference for the Community Liaison Committee be developed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration in consultation with Councillors for Wards 30 and 32.

 

d. That mental health, public health, housing supports and a day program be in place in partnership with local service providers such as South Riverdale Community Health Centre, Applegrove Community Complex, and Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre.

 

e. That a 24/7 staff presence be established to ensure clients are welcomed immediately and that laneways and local parks are monitored for loitering.

 

f. That HOPE Shelter be an alcohol and drug free environment.

 

g. That a communications platform be established (such as a website or email service) where residents can obtain information and regular reports from the Community Liaison Committee meetings in both English and Chinese and in accordance with the City's translation policies.

 

h. That a six month review of operations be undertaken after the opening of the shelter, by the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration in consultation with the Salvation Army, and with input from the Community Liaison Committee.

 

3.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to identify the resources necessary to finance the supports set out in Recommendation 2.d.

 

4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to ensure that:

 

a. The City and the Salvation Army HOPE Shelter will work collaboratively with the Community Liaison Committee to achieve the best possible outcomes for clients and the neighbourhood and will seek input from the Community Liaison Committee on design matters such as the location of entrances and exits and outdoor smoking areas; and

 

b. The Terms of Reference for the Community Liaison Committee include provisions to reflect this commitment.

 

5.  City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to ensure that HOPE Shelter's policies and procedures have a protocol in place for service users who may not be appropriate for a stay at the shelter which will include referring clients to another shelter with space in an appropriate bedded program or to more suitable support services.

 

6.  City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) to distribute a 24 hour contact number for the shelter and information on how to contact SSHA Client Support Services to all residents and businesses within 250 metres of the shelter prior to the opening of the shelter and ensure such information is available in English and Chinese.

 

7.  City Council direct appropriate city staff to collaborate with Toronto Police Service 55 Division to conduct a Community Safety Audit of the surrounding neighbourhood in Wards 30 and 32 and make recommendations based on the findings of the audit and that the Deputy City Managers, Clusters A and B identify the resources necessary to finance the recommendations from the relevant Divisions.

 

8.  City Council request that the President and Chief Executive of Toronto Hydro and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation assess the lighting currently provided in the streets and parks immediately surrounding 29 Leslie Street in Wards 30 and 32 and make recommendations to improve maintenance and lighting on an ongoing basis.

 

9.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to assess Maple Leaf Forever Park and Leslie Grove Park and make recommendations which include the resources needed to revitalize them.

Origin

(January 18, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report seeks City Council approval to open an 80 bed men's emergency shelter operated by the Salvation Army at 29 Leslie Street in Ward 32. The shelter will replace capacity in the shelter system lost when the Salvation Army closed the HOPE shelter in April 2015.

 

The property meets the requirements of the Municipal Shelter By-law 138-2003. It is more than 250 metres from another shelter, it is located on a major arterial road and a community information sharing process is currently underway.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 18, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on A New Home for Salvation Army HOPE Shelter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-87849.pdf

Speakers

Bradley Harris, Executive Director, Toronto Housing and Homeless Supports, The Salvation Army
Leigh Chapman
Andrea Cheung
Janet MacDonald
Michelle Tofano
Erin McKell
Daniel Trayes
Sherry Petrie
Michele Heath, Urban Health Manager, South Riverdale Community Health Centre
Damian Thomas
Paul Dowling
Celina Dara
Rod Rego
Gus Sandusky
Chris Sulway
April Cook
Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Communications (Committee)

(January 9, 2016) E-mail from Joe Jimenez (CD.Main.CD9.1.1)
(January 9, 2016) E-mail from Nicholas Brooks (CD.Main.CD9.1.2)
(January 9, 2016) E-mail from Carl Calandra (CD.Main.CD9.1.3)
(January 9, 2016) E-mail from Annette Parent (CD.Main.CD9.1.4)
(January 10, 2016) E-mail from Krista Colosimo (CD.Main.CD9.1.5)
(January 11, 2016) E-mail from Rose Giles (CD.Main.CD9.1.6)
(January 11, 2016) E-mail from Missie Bee (CD.Main.CD9.1.7)
(January 11, 2016) E-mail from Dean Hill (CD.Main.CD9.1.8)
(January 11, 2016) E-mail from Alaine Rogers (CD.Main.CD9.1.9)
(January 11, 2016) E-mail from Olga Haliuk (CD.Main.CD9.1.10)
(January 12, 2016) E-mail from Newton Ngo (CD.Main.CD9.1.11)
(January 12, 2016) E-mail from Cindy Poon (CD.Main.CD9.1.12)
(January 12, 2016) E-mail from Chris and Jana Gallagher (CD.Main.CD9.1.13)
(January 13, 2016) E-mail from Douglas Gammage (CD.Main.CD9.1.14)
(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Shaleen Sulway (CD.Main.CD9.1.15)
(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Tracy Chandonnet (CD.Main.CD9.1.16)
(January 16, 2016) E-mail from L. Paquin (CD.Main.CD9.1.17)
(January 16, 2016) E-mail from Angela Maddams (CD.Main.CD9.1.18)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Ted Darling (CD.Main.CD9.1.19)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Paul and Selen Sorensen (CD.Main.CD9.1.20)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Daniel Begin (CD.Main.CD9.1.21)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Angela Maddams (CD.Main.CD9.1.22)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Will Predhomme (CD.Main.CD9.1.23)
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Lisa Erickson (CD.New.CD9.1.24)
(January 25, 2016) E-mail from Nat and Tom Lumby (CD.New.CD9.1.25)
(January 24, 2016) Letter from Christine Campbell (CD.New.CD9.1.26)
(January 25, 2016) E-mail from Nicole King (CD.New.CD9.1.27)
(January 26, 2016) Letter from Sue Birch (CD.New.CD9.1.28)
(January 26, 2016) E-mail from Jim Collins (CD.New.CD9.1.29)
(January 26, 2016) E-mail from Jennifer Predhomme (CD.New.CD9.1.30)
(January 20, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon (CD.New.CD9.1.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-58576.pdf
(January 27, 2016) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher (CD.New.CD9.1.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-58577.pdf
(January 27, 2016) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher (CD.New.CD9.1.33)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/comm/communicationfile-58578.pdf
(January 26, 2016) E-mail from Daniel Taylor, Market Manager, The Leslieville Market (CD.New.CD9.1.34)
(January 27, 2016) Submission from Erin McKell (CD.New.CD9.1.35)

Communications (City Council)

(January 27, 2016) E-mail from Francoise Vulpe (CC.Main.CD9.1.36)
(January 27, 2016) E-mail from Ian Sibbing (CC.Main.CD9.1.37)
(January 28, 2016) E-mail from Amy Chan (CC.Supp.CD9.1.38)

CD9.2 - Amendment to Blanket Contract 47019332 Issued to Intergraph Canada for Professional Services and Additional Licences for Existing Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Business Intelligence (BI) Systems

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant authority to increase the value of Blanket Contract 47019332 issued to Intergraph Canada Ltd. by $800,000 net of HST ($814,080 net of HST recoveries) revising the current approved value from $508,800 net of HST ($517,755 net of HST recoveries) to a grand total of $1,308,800 net of HST ($1,331,835 net of HST recoveries).

Origin

(January 7, 2016) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request the authority to increase the value of the existing blanket contract 47019332 issued to Intergraph Canada Ltd, the vendor which provides Toronto Fire Services (TFS) with the Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) System and Business Intelligence (BI) software. The requested amendment will increase the blanket contract by an additional $800,000 net of HST ($814,080 net of HST recoveries). This amount will increase the contract value to $1,308,800 net of HST ($1,331,835 net of HST recoveries).

 

TFS has used Intergraph Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) systems since 2000. The CAD system is critical to TFS emergency response and is used to recommend the appropriate response to an emergency based on specific criteria. System adjustments and upgrades are an essential part of operating a mission critical system and ultimately have an impact service delivery. However, the TFS CAD is currently two releases behind the current Intergraph release.

 

Implementation of the Intergraph CAD release update maintains supportability and allows for continued vendor support. The upgrade is essential for TFS to move forward with numerous technological initiatives as outlined in the TFS Master Fire Plan 2015-2019 such as Fire Station Alerting, Dynamic staging, Mobile Responder and Traffic Signal Pre-emption with Live Interactive GPS.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code By-Law Chapter 195-Purchasing, where the current request has exceeded the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five year commitment limit under Section 1 of the Purchasing By-Law and also exceeds the threshold of $500,000, net of HST, allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code By-Law, Chapter 71 - Financial Control.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 7, 2016) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management on Amendment to Blanket Contract 47019332 Issued to Intergraph Canada for Professional Services and Additional Licences for Existing Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Business Intelligence (BI) Systems
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-87686.pdf

Economic Development Committee - Meeting 9

ED9.4 - Economic Dashboard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

 The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive the report (December 24, 2015) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture for information.

Origin

(December 24, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report updates the Toronto Economic Dashboard. It provides a summary of the most recent data available at the time this report was prepared for key economic indicators benchmarking the city's economic performance.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 24, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Economic Dashboard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-87161.pdf
(December 24, 2015) Attachment: Economic Dashboard Presentation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-87162.pdf

ED9.6 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2016 Operating Budgets - Report No. 2

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 9 - York Centre, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 25 - Don Valley West, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 29 - Toronto-Danforth, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York, 37 - Scarborough Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that: 

 

1.   City Council adopt and certify the 2016 recommended expenditures and levy requirements of the following Business Improvement Areas:

 

 

Business Improvement Area

2016 Expenditure
Estimates
($)

2016 Levy
Funds Required
($)

Albion Islington Square

 262,261

 197,261

Bloor Annex

 251,619

 239,892

Bloor By The Park

 87,578

 83,354

Bloordale Village

 103,169

 92,278

Bloor Street

 2,732,872

 1,650,000

Bloor West Village

 418,991

 387,898

Bloor-Yorkville

 3,452,868

 3,019,696

Cabbagetown

 218,939

 195,626

Chinatown

 566,100

 437,830

Corso Italia

 306,573

 221,164

Dovercourt Village

 20,130

 7,055

Downtown Yonge

 3,473,349

 2,583,899

Dundas West

 237,147

 207,624

Financial District

 1,972,574

 1,543,714

Gerrard India Bazaar

 271,443

 133,386

Greektown on the Danforth

 1,332,911

 424,297

Hillcrest Village

103,940

96,088

Junction Gardens

 382,356

 275,434

Kensington Market

 206,050

 135,667

Korea Town

 137,346

 93,283

Lakeshore Village

 103,407

 98,446

Liberty Village

 1,604,359

 291,658

Little Italy

 635,539

 379,928

Little Portugal

 83,227

 54,500

Midtown Yonge

 149,443

 149,443

Mimico By The Lake

 61,568

 53,842

Mirvish Village

 34,977

 0

Mount Pleasant

 222,426

 157,512

Ossington Avenue

 62,287

 54,012

Regal Heights Village

 98,160

 72,352

Rosedale Main Street

 305,472

 262,796

shoptheQueensway.com

 143,841

 125,000

St. Clair Gardens

 73,509

 67,776

St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood

 1,207,020

 1,014,120

The Beach

 275,571

 235,328

The Eglinton Way

 390,186

 310,271

The Kingsway

 564,694

 346,190

The Waterfront

 897,336

 704,100

Toronto Entertainment District

 2,542,993

 2,079,199

Trinity Bellwoods

 53,945

 51,603

Uptown Yonge

 238,769

 212,130

Village of Islington

 143,781

 100,249

Wexford Heights

 444,084

 199,506

Wilson Village

 323,003

 275,169

 

Origin

(December 21, 2015) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report brings forward Business Improvement Area (BIA) annual operating budgets for approval by City Council as required by the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  City Council approval is required to permit the City to collect funds through the tax levy on behalf of the BIAs.

 

Complete budgets and supporting documentation received by December 2, 2015 have been reviewed and are reported here. BIA Operating Budgets received after this date will be brought forward in later reports. Of the 81 established BIAs, 10 BIA budgets were approved by City Council on December 9, 2015 (ED8.6), 44 BIA budgets are submitted for approval in this report, and one BIA is inactive.

 

The recommendations in this report reflect 2016 Operating Budgets approved by the respective BIAs’ Boards of Management and have been reviewed by City staff to ensure BIA budgets reflect Council’s approved policies and practices.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 21, 2015) Report and Appendices A and B from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2016 Operating Budgets - Report No. 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-87135.pdf

Government Management Committee - Meeting 9

GM9.1 - 1 Eglinton Square - Eglinton Square Branch Library - Designation of a Portion of Premises as a Municipal Capital Facility

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council pass a by-law pursuant to section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:

 

a.  Enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with KS Eglinton Square Inc, the current owner of Eglinton Square Shopping Centre at 1 Eglinton Square, in respect of approximately 4,716 square feet of the current leased space and 5,284 additional square feet of additional rentable area leased by the Toronto Public Library;

 

b.  Continue the exemption for the leased space currently occupied by the library of approximately 4,716 square feet; and

 

c.  Exempt the additional leased space of approximately 5,284 square feet from taxation for municipal and education purposes, for which the tax exemption is to be effective from the latest of the following dates: the commencement date of the lease; the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed; or the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the by-law to the Minister of Education, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Conseil Scolaire de District du Centre-Sud-Ouest, and the Conseil Scolaire de District du Catholique Centre-Sud.

Origin

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report seeks Council’s authority for the adoption of necessary by-laws to designate as a municipal capital facility the premises occupied by the Eglinton Square Branch Library located at 1 Eglinton Square within the Eglinton Square Shopping Centre, and to provide a property tax exemption for municipal and education purposes.  The municipal capital facility agreement will provide for a continued exemption for the space currently occupied by the library of approximately 4,716 square feet, and a new exemption for an additional 5,284 square feet of new space that is being leased by the library for twenty years with an estimated effective date of October 1, 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Treasurer on 1 Eglinton Square - Eglinton Square Branch Library - Designation of a Portion of Premises as a Municipal Capital Facility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86713.pdf

GM9.2 - 123 Rexdale Boulevard - Northern Elms Branch Library - Designation of a Portion of Premises as a Municipal Capital Facility

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke North

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council pass a by-law pursuant to section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:

 

a.  Enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with 994480 Ontario Limited, the current owner of the strip mall at 123 Rexdale Boulevard, in respect of approximately 3,078 square feet of the current leased space and 858 additional square feet of additional rentable area leased by the Toronto Public Library;

 

b.  Continue the exemption for the leased space currently occupied by the library of approximately 3,078 square feet; and

 

c.  Exempt the additional leased space of approximately 858 square feet from taxation for municipal and education purposes, for which the tax exemption is to be effective from the latest of the following dates: the commencement date of the lease; the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed; or the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the by-law to the Minister of Education, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Conseil Scolaire de District du Centre-Sud-Ouest, and the Conseil Scolaire de District du Catholique Centre-Sud.

Origin

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report seeks Council’s authority for the adoption of necessary by-laws to designate as a municipal capital facility the premises occupied by the Northern Elms Branch Library located in a strip mall at 123 Rexdale Boulevard, and to provide a property tax exemption for municipal and education purposes.  The municipal capital facility agreement will provide for a continued exemption for the space currently occupied by the library of approximately 3,078 square feet and a new exemption for an additional 858 square feet of new space that is being leased by the library.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Treasurer on 123 Rexdale Boulevard - Northern Elms Branch Library - Designation of a Portion of Premises as a Municipal Capital Facility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86714.pdf

GM9.3 - Transfer of Additional Property Interests in 497 Richmond Street West to Build Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City to enter into an Option agreement with Build Toronto, for nominal consideration, pursuant to which Build Toronto will have the right to acquire additional airspace located above that portion of the Property municipally known as 497 Richmond Street West, between the elevations of 47.5 and 55.5 metres above grade, shown as Part 7 on Sketch No. 2012-0307-4 in Appendix 3 and as more particularly described in Appendix 2 to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer, for the purpose of fire exits and a mechanical penthouse, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendices 1 and 2 to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City to enter into an agreement with Build Toronto, for nominal consideration, permitting Build Toronto to retain ownership of that portion of the Property known municipally as 60 Brant Street, shown as Part 2 on Sketch No. 2012-0307-4 in Appendix 3 to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer, as well as that portion of 60 Brant Street located to the west of the existing building structure, for the purpose of the future redevelopment of the adjoining lands, such agreement to otherwise be on terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Office, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City to enter into a Limiting Distance Agreement with Build Toronto, for nominal consideration, which will prevent any structure from being constructed above an elevation of 16.7 metres above grade on that portion of the Property known municipally as 60 Brant Street, shown as Part 5 on Sketch No. 2012-0307-4 in Appendix 3 to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City to enter into amending agreements in relation to the existing Reconveyance Agreement, Parking Space Conveyance Agreement and Reciprocal Agreement, or such other agreements respecting 60 Brant Street, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix 4 to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

5.  City Council grant authority to fund the City’s outstanding expenses related to the property in this report from the Approved Operating Budget for Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy (FREEE), in the year(s) that the expenses are incurred, as necessary, and, once these expenses are known, to transfer the funding for these expenses from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF), with appropriate adjustments to Facilities and Real Estate’s Approved Operating Budget, as necessary, through subsequent Quarterly Variance Reports.

 

6.  City Council grant authority severally to each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services to execute the transaction documents and agreements required to implement the Recommendations in this report on behalf of the City, including the extension of any required consents, approvals or permissions.

 

7.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions referenced in the above Recommendations on behalf of the City, including making payment of any necessary expenses, amending the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), and amending or waiving the terms and conditions, as she may from time to time consider reasonable.

Origin

(December 14, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report recommends terms of transfer to Build Toronto for an additional stratified portion of the property municipally known as 497 Richmond Street West and other property interests in relation to 497 Richmond Street West, including the buildings located around its perimeter having the following convenience addresses:  505 and 511 Richmond Street West, 60 Brant Street and 17 Maud Street (collectively the "Property").

Background Information (Committee)

(December 14, 2015) Report and Appendices 1 to 4 from the Chief Corporate Officer on Transfer of Additional Property Interests in 497 Richmond Street West to Build Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86740.pdf

GM9.4 - Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North - Status Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to proceed with Phase 2, Demolition of the Existing North Market Building at 92 Front Street, of the Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North project, including demolition of the existing building and archaeological assessment of the site in advance of new construction.

Origin

(December 17, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to inform Council of the impact of archaeological assessment on the Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North project timelines and to obtain approval to demolish the existing North Market Building at 92 Front Street. subject to confirmation by the Architect that the construction cost estimate for the new building is within budget.

 

Cost confirmation for the new building, by way of a bid price following the tender process, prior to demolition requires confirmation of a construction start date. This cannot be done at this time due to the uncertainty associated with the delay to complete the archaeological assessment in advance of new construction.  The archaeological assessment requires the demolition of the existing building to allow full site access before Stage 4 archaeological fieldwork can safely occur.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 17, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North - Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86763.pdf

GM9.5 - Union Station Proposed Building Enhancements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The Chief Corporate Officer has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GM9.5a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending land disposition by the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize an amendment to the 2009 Head Lease Agreement between the City of Toronto and Osmington (Union Station) Inc. ("Osmington"), and authorize any other necessary agreements, to implement the building enhancements for Union Station, any necessary upgrades required to allow for retail on the GO West Concourse, and the heritage interpretation plan, substantially on the terms set out in the Term Sheet - Attachment 1 to the report (December 24, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer and such other or amended terms as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize an amendment to the retainer agreement with Davies Ward Phillips and Vineberg LLP (Purchase Order No. 6025203), in the additional amount of up to $350,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes), to provide continuing real estate legal advice and expertise for the on-going agreement updates associated with the revitalization project.

 

3.  City Council authorize an amendment to the retainer agreement with PwC (Purchase Order No. 6037971), in the additional amount of up to $150,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes), to provide continuing real estate advice and expertise for the on-going lease related matters associated with the revitalization project.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The following gave a presentation to the Government Management Committee on Union Station Proposed Building Enhancements:

 

- the Chief Corporate Officer;

 

- Brad Keast, Vice-President, Osmington Inc.; and

 

- Denis Gervais, Principle, GH+A.

Origin

(December 24, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

In 2013, City staff reported to Council that the City's Head Lessee at Union Station, Osmington (Union Station) Inc., was interested in developing a renewed vision for the commercial retail and event elements at the Station.  As the revitalization of Union Station has progressed, Osmington has further developed the design for the commercial retail and event spaces to create a 2015 vision for a dynamic, customer-focussed experience that includes engaging the top restauranteurs, retailers and cultural institutions of the City. The City shares this vision with Osmington to create a destination for commuters, local residents and visitors alike. In order to create a world class destination, base building and leasehold enhancements to the building are needed, including lighting, audio-visual equipment, furniture, amenities and other improvements to the retail and event offerings for Station users.

 

The enhancements are estimated to cost $32 million plus HST and contingency, and will be shared between Osmington (60%) and the City (40 percent). The City's 40 percent portion of the enhancement costs will be funded by Osmington and recovered with revenue that is generated from sponsorship and retail tenant percentage rent (as defined in the attached Term Sheet). The proposed enhancements do not require the City to use its own capital funding and presents no risk to the revenues that the City would receive in the absence of these enhancements.

 

This report recommends that City Council authorize an amendment to the 2009 Head Lease Agreement between the City and Osmington and authorize any necessary related agreements to allow Osmington to fund, design and construct enhancements to Union Station that will make it a City-wide destination for dining, retail, events and culture.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 24, 2015) Revised Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Corporate Officer on Union Station Proposed Building Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-87143.pdf
(January 4, 2016) Presentation from Brad Keast, Vice President, Osmington Inc. and Denis Gervais, Principle, GH+A, on Union Station Proposed Building Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-87170.pdf
(December 22, 2015) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Corporate Officer on Union Station Proposed Building Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-87140.pdf
(December 14, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Union Station Proposed Retail Enhancements - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86773.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(January 15, 2016) Supplementary report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Union Station Proposed Building Enhancements (GM9.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-87892.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Sponsorship Revenue and Financial Analysis for Union Station Building Enhancements

GM9.6 - Below Market Rent Lease Extension Agreement with Regent Park Focus Youth Media Arts Centre at 38-40 Regent Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Extension Agreement of the Below Market Rent lease agreement with Regent Park Focus Youth Media Arts Centre for a five (5) year term, substantially based on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix A to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and on such other terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the Extension Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, amendments, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the Extension Agreement, deliver any notices, pay expenses and amend the commencement and other dates to such earlier or later dates(s), on such terms and conditions, as she may from time to time determine.

 

4.  City Council grant an exemption from the Return on Investment (ROI) requirement as the tool is under development with Social Development, Finance and Administration Division.

Origin

(December 14, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to enter into a Below Market Rent (BMR) lease extension agreement with Regent Park Focus Youth Media Arts Centre for approximately 3,729 square feet of space within the basement of the property municipally known as 38-40 Regent Street in Ward 28 Toronto Centre Rosedale for a further (5) year period. Regent Park Focus Youth Media Arts Centre will extend its lease to January 6, 2021 commencing upon the expiry of the existing Below Market Rent lease.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 14, 2015) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, on Below Market Rent Lease Extension Agreement with Regent Park Focus Youth Media Arts Centre at 38-40 Regent Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86780.pdf

GM9.7 - Renewal of Below Market Rent Lease Agreement with Flemo City Media at 29 St. Dennis Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the renewal of the Below Market Rent lease agreement with Flemo City Media for a five (5) year term, substantially based on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix A to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and on such other terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or her successor or designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the sub lease agreement including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices, and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

3.  City Council grant an exemption from the Return on Investment (ROI) requirement as the tool is under development with Social Development, Finance and Administration Division.

Origin

(December 14, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to renew the Below-Market Rent (BMR) lease agreement with Flemo City Media (FCM) for five (5) years starting March 1, 2016 for approximately 361 square feet of space located at 29 St. Dennis Drive in the Flemingdon Park priority neighbourhood in Ward 26 Don Valley West.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 14, 2015) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, on Renewal of Below Market Rent Lease Agreement with Flemo City Media at 29 St. Dennis Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86776.pdf

GM9.8 - Impact of Social Assistance Management System (SAMS) Implementation in Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request that the Government of Ontario recognize the impact Social Assistance Management System has had on municipalities and provide necessary funding to offset the incremental costs of Social Assistance Management System for 2015 and 2016 (currently estimated at $7.25 million annually).

 

2.  City Council transmit this report to the Minister of Community and Social Services (MCSS).

 

3.  City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services to report back in the fall of 2016 on the status of the Social Assistance Management System implementation in Toronto.

Origin

(December 15, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services

Summary

As part of the provincial government’s initiative to modernize and improve social assistance, the Ministry of Community and Social Services implemented a new social assistance delivery technology in November 2014. This new technology – Social Assistance Management System (SAMS) – is a mandatory province-wide system used to deliver the Ontario Works (OW) and Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) across Ontario.

 

As the organization primarily responsible for the successful delivery of social assistance in Toronto, TESS, on behalf of the City, made extensive preparations and major investments to ensure that the implementation of SAMS would cause minimal service disruptions to clients and that staff would be as prepared as possible to use the new system. This involved providing extensive feedback to the province through all stages of SAMS design and implementation, communicating the business needs of our operations and detailing business risks prior to implementation.

 

This report discusses the proactive steps TESS took to prepare for the implementation of SAMS. It specifically describes how TESS has worked to minimize service impacts through the initial implementation period and on an ongoing basis. Finally, the report addresses the major issues with SAMS at this point, the implications for TESS in terms of serving OW clients in Toronto, notably the requirement to refocus on service planning and the delivery of employment services, both of which were negatively affected by SAMS implementation, plus the steps TESS is taking with the province to improve system performance.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 15, 2015) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services on Impact of Social Assistance Management System (SAMS) Implementation in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86902.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Paula Fletcher

GM9.9 - Acquisition of 592 and 598 Gerrard Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the acquisition of the property known municipally as 592 and 598 Gerrard Street East (the "Property") from Sonnam Investments Inc. (the "Vendor") based on the terms and conditions contained in Schedule A to the report (December 15, 2015) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority, plus the additional expenditure of approximately $140,000 for any associated costs such as land transfer tax, title insurance, appraisal fees, survey, environmental studies, and legal fees for a total acquisition cost estimate of $2,458,000.

 

2.  City Council amend the 2016 Capital Budget and 2017-2025 Capital Plan for the Toronto Parking Authority by adding the capital project "592 and 598 Gerrard Street East Carpark Development" to be funded by reallocation of capital funds from the "Carpark Provisions 2016" project included in the 2016 Approved Capital Budget and 2017-2025 Capital Plan in the amount of $2,458,000 in order to facilitate the purchase of the Property.

 

3.  City Council direct that subsequent to acquisition, the Property be designated for municipal parking purposes, to be managed by the Toronto Parking Authority.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the purchase transaction, deliver any notices, pay any expenses and amend the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), on such terms and conditions, as she may, from time to time, determine.

 

5.  City Council request the Toronto Parking Authority, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to undertake an economic development and planning analysis for East Chinatown for the Toronto Parking Authority lots and surrounding properties which addresses future mixed commercial residential development including affordable housing.

Origin

(December 15, 2015) Report from the President, Toronto Parking Authority

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain Council's authorization to purchase the property municipally known as 592 and 598 Gerrard Street East from Sonnam Investments Inc. to provide future municipal parking within the East Chinatown neighbourhood.  The intention is to maintain the commercial building on a fully leased basis which includes an ancillary parking area until such time as it is determined that the site is ready to be redeveloped into a new surface carpark.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 15, 2015) Report, Site Location Map, Schedule A and Appendices A to C from the President, Toronto Parking Authority, on Acquisition of 592 and 598 Gerrard Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-86784.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Paula Fletcher

Licensing and Standards Committee - Meeting 9

LS9.2 - Expanding the Sale of Fireworks to Include Labour Day

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 100 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve amendments to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 466, Fireworks, to authorize holders of Temporary Fireworks Vendor Permits to sell fireworks on Labour Day and the 7-day period leading up to Labour Day, such amendments to come into force on May 1, 2016.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in City Council to give effect to Recommendation 1 above, subject to such technical and stylistic amendments as may be required.

Origin

(January 11, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and, the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services

Summary

This report responds to Licensing and Standards Committee's request at its meeting of October 22, 2015, for staff to determine how best to allow fireworks on Labour Day.

 

This report proposes amendments to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 466, Fireworks, to allow temporary fireworks vendors holding a valid temporary fireworks vendor's permit to sell fireworks on Labour Day and the 7-day period leading up to Labour Day. The discharge of fireworks for Labour Day would require a Special Occasions Discharge Permit.

 

The amendments address Licensing and Standards Committee's specific request to expand the sale of fireworks to include Labour Day.

 

Legal Services was consulted in the preparation of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 11, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services on Expanding the Sale of Fireworks to Include Labour Day
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-87325.pdf
(January 11, 2016) Attachment 1 - Fireworks Incidents in the City of Toronto between: 2010-2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-87326.pdf

LS9.3 - Licensing of Wildlife Control Operators

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication LS9.3.17 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct that the City of Toronto require wildlife control operators to be licensed by September 1, 2016.

 

2. City Council direct that the City of Toronto define a wildlife control operator as any individual or business that charges a fee to discourage, evict or remove wildlife that is causing damage, is a public nuisance or is posing a health risk.

 

3. City Council direct that the purpose of the licensing requirement is to ensure the City of Toronto creates qualifications and conditions covering the licensing of individuals performing wildlife control activities in order to:

 

a.  ensure public safety, public health and environmental protection;

 

b.  protect consumers from fraudulent and/or untrained operators; and

 

c.  set humane standards regarding removal methods, capture, handling, transport and euthanasia of wildlife.

 

4. City Council direct that the licensing requirement will support the provincial Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, by ensuring, at a minimum, that:

 

a.  all persons engaged in the business of providing wildlife control services must possess a wildlife control operator’s license by September 1, 2016;

 

b.  all wildlife removal operators and field staff must successfully complete the training course mandated by the City of Toronto, and the training course will include, at a minimum, the training course outline below;

 

c.  wildlife control training to consist of a one-day course hosted by the City of Toronto MLS;

 

d.  wildlife control training to include Health and Safety, Professional and Humane Standards and Legal Requirements;

 

e.  each applicant must produce a valid fall arrest/fall protection certificate as proof of fall protection training that is compliant with the Ministry of Labour’s Occupational Health and Safety Act and Regulations;

 

f.  each applicant must produce a commercial insurance certificate indicating that the wildlife control company, he or she owns or is gainfully employed by, possesses a minimum of $3,000,000 liability coverage; and

 

g.  each applicant must produce a certified criminal record check;

 

h.  each applicant must agree to not use leg-hold or body-gripping traps or devices.

 

5. In order to minimize costs:

 

a.  City Council direct that City of Toronto staff request that Structural Pest Management Association of Ontario (SPMAO) and AAA Gates Wildlife Control design a one-day course for their industry members at no charge to the City;

 

b.  the one day workshop will be held at a City of Toronto property; and

 

c.  City Council request the Toronto Wildlife Centre to continue to care for sick and injured animals as they currently do.

 

6.  City Council direct the annual license fee for a wildlife control operator be $400.

 

7. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 4 to the report (November 10, 2015) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

 

Course Outline for Wildlife Operators referenced in Recommendation 4.b. above

 

1.  Public / Personal Health & Safety

 

a.  understanding zoonotic diseases to ensure that the wildlife control technician can identify and remove diseased / sick wildlife thus preventing further outbreaks and the spiraling costs of disease control (i.e. raccoon feline distemper)

 

b.  utilizing protective measures aimed at avoiding disease transfer from animal to people

 

c.  protecting public health through standardized education and information

 

d.  understanding the role of The Canadian Cooperative Wildlife Health Centre (CCWHC), The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and Toronto Animal Services

 

e.  instruction provided on the importance of personal protective equipment (PPE), personal hygiene and the safe use of ladders, working at heights, equipment, tools etc.

 

f. steps for the proper handling and disposal of contaminated materials and dead animals

 

g.  highlighting the advantages of Tetanus and Rabies vaccinations

 

h.  familiar with the Ministry of Labour’s Occupational Health & Safety Act

 

2.  Professional and Humane Conduct

 

a.  understand basic behaviour and biology of common wildlife species

 

b.  work for the protection of wildlife and promote harmony between wildlife and the public

 

c.  offer reasonable pricing for the work performed and delivery of service that guarantees customer satisfaction

 

d.  use devices that do not cause suffering or unnecessary death

 

e.  apply methods that only involve humane deterring, repelling, evicting or excluding and in a manner that keeps animal families together

 

f.  utilize acceptable heated baby reunion boxes when reuniting offspring with their mother

 

g.  do not use cage or box traps on the outside of a building structure (i.e. only to be used on the inside of a working / living space) to avoid exposing the animal to inclement weather

 

h.  implement control measures that address the root cause of the wildlife problem and prevents reoccurrences

 

i.  monitor all work in progress in a timely fashion (i.e. traps, one-way doors, baby reunion boxes, etc.)

 

j.  keep detailed records of all work performed including date and time of job activities

 

k.  deliver sick, injured or orphaned wildlife to a licensed rehabilitator, animal services or veterinarian for care or euthanasia, if necessary.

 

l.  provide the client with a detailed written description and cost of the work to be performed, together with the applicable warranty, company name, address, phone number and the wildlife operators license number

 

3.  Legal Requirements

 

a.  be compliant with all federal, provincial and municipal laws governing wildlife (i.e. OMNR’s Fish & Wildlife Conservation Act; Endangered Species Act; Migratory Bird Act; MOE’s Pesticides Act; OSPCA Act etc.)

 

b.  obtaining necessary permits to deal with protected wildlife

 

c.  correctly identifying endangered and threatened species

 

d.  adhering to building codes (i.e. screening of chimneys)

 

e.  what is the public legally permitted to do for the control wildlife on their property

 

f.  euthanasia and who is authorized to perform the task

 

g.  following environmentally regulations regarding proper carcass disposal

 

h.  rabies vector species and the role of the OMNR’s Rabies Unit

 

Origin

(November 10, 2015) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

This report responds to Licensing and Standards Committee's request to provide the Province of Ontario's reply to consider expanding its licensing requirements to include wildlife control operators and for the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to give consideration to licensing wildlife control operators.

 

At its meeting of August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014, City Council adopted the staff recommendation to request the Province of Ontario to consider expanding its licensing requirements to include wildlife control operators. City Clerks sent a request to the Province on September 12, 2014. To date, the City has not received a response.

 

Municipal Licensing and Standards division conducted a thorough review of this issue and reported to the March 18, 2014 meeting of Licensing and Standards Committee.

 

A review of relevant legislation indicates that there are provincial laws in place to protect wild animals and residents of Toronto from unqualified wildlife removal companies. These laws are enforced by the Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) and Ministry of Government and Consumer Services.

 

Stakeholder consultations and research revealed some concerns with the activities of wildlife control operators, although the issues cannot be generalized to the entire industry.

 

Accordingly, the report recommended referring the matter to the Province of Ontario for consideration because it is the level of government with direct responsibility for wildlife management and the regulation of wildlife control activities such as hunting and trapping.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2015) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, on Licensing of Wildlife Control Operators
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-86587.pdf
(March 4, 2014) Attachment 1: Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-86588.pdf
(May 9, 2014) Attachment 2: Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-86589.pdf
(March 28, 2014) Attachment 3: Report from the City Solicitor
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-86590.pdf
(March 28, 2014) Attachment 4: Confidential Information on the Feasibility of Licensing Wildlife Control Operators
(November 26, 2015) Attachment 5 - Decision Letter from Licensing and Standards Committee on Item LS8.1 - Licensing of Wildlife Control Operators
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-87702.pdf

Speakers

Rudolf Mueller, Ontario Fur Managers Federation

Communications (Committee)

(November 17, 2015) Letter from Brad Gates, President, AAA Gates' Wildlife Control (LS.Main.LS9.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-57747.pdf
(November 17, 2015) E-mail from Wendy (LS.Main.LS9.3.2)
(November 25, 2015) Letter from Geoff Walsh, President, Structural Pest Management Association of Ontario (SPMASO) (LS.Main.LS9.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-57748.pdf
(November 25, 2015) Letter from James Baker, Executive Director, Fur Institute of Canada (LS.Main.LS9.3.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-57754.pdf
(November 25, 2015) Submission from Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker on legal opinions submitted by Animal Alliance of Canada and Zoocheck Canada (LS.Main.LS9.3.5)
(November 25, 2015) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (LS.Main.LS9.3.6)
(November 25, 2015) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson (LS.Main.LS9.3.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-57744.pdf
(November 25, 2015) E-mail from Tony Arruda, GTA Wildlife Manager, ORKIN Canada (LS.Main.LS9.3.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-57743.pdf
(November 25, 2015) E-mail from Brad Gates, President, AAA Gates' Wildlife Control forwarding legal opinion from Gartner Kostanka, Animal Lawyers & Mediators (LS.Main.LS9.3.9)
(November 25, 2015) E-mail from Liz White, Animal Alliance of Canada (LS.Main.LS9.3.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-57750.pdf
(November 26, 2015) E-mail from Anna Butt (LS.Main.LS9.3.11)
(November 26, 2015) Letter from Robin Horwath, General Manager, Ontario Fur Managers - Facts Sheets on file (LS.Main.LS9.3.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-57745.pdf
(November 26, 2015) Submission from Nathalie Karvonen, Executive Director, Toronto Wildlife Centre (LS.Main.LS9.3.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-57746.pdf
(January 21, 2016) Letter from Liz White, Animal Alliance of Canada (LS.New.LS9.3.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-58530.pdf
(January 21, 2016) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (LS.New.LS9.3.15)
(January 22, 2016) Letter from Robin Horwath, General Manager, Ontario Fur Managers Federation (LS.New.LS9.3.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-58533.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(February 1, 2016) Letter from Jacques Messier, DVM, MBA Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Humane Society (CC.Supp.LS9.3.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58762.pdf

LS9.4 - Calgary Injunction Decision regarding Unlicensed Ground Transportation Providers

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's Key Matter and first item of business on Wednesday, February 3rd

The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (LS9.4a with recommendations)

Communications LS9.4.7 to LS9.4.12 have been submitted on this Item

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board, and the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to return to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice to seek an injunction against Uber and individual UberX drivers, based on the updated regulations to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 545 approved by City Council at its meeting on September 30, October 1 and 2, 2015.

 

2. City Council direct that the confidential attachment to the report (January 8, 2016) from the City Solicitor remain confidential indefinitely as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

This item was considered with Items LS9.5, LS9.6, LS9.7 and LS9.9.

Origin

(January 8, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Summary

This report summarizes information regarding the decision of the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta which granted an interim injunction to the City of Calgary prohibiting individuals from offering services through the UberX platform without a municipal taxicab or limousine licence.  The confidential portion of this report (Attachment 1) provides information and legal advice regarding this decision.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 8, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on Calgary Injunction Decision regarding Unlicensed Ground Transportation Providers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-87346.pdf
(January 8, 2016) Confidential Attachment 1

Background Information (City Council)

(February 2, 2016) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on Motion Regarding Commencement of UberX Injunction (LS9.4a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-90016.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

Speakers

Peter Rosenthal, Legal Counsel, iTaxi Workers Association
Sajid Mughal, iTaxiworkers Association
Peter Mandronis, Peter's Taxi (Submission Filed)
Harvey Spiegel
Hayley Steinhart (Submission Filed)
Kathy Platanitis
Sam Moini
Councillor Janet Davis

Communications (Committee)

(January 19, 2016) E-mail from Peter Zahakos, Associated Toronto Taxi-Cab Co-operative Limited (LS.New.LS9.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-58496.pdf
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Harvey Spiegel, Q.C., forwarding a document titled "The Implications of the Calgary Injunction Decision and the Legal Issues involved in an application by the City to enforce the provisions of the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 545" (LS.New.LS9.4.2)
(January 21, 2016) E-mail from Councillor Jim Karygiannis forwarding an article from the Canadian Press (LS.New.LS9.4.3)
(December 22, 2015) Letter from Michael I. Binetti, Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP (LS.New.LS9.4.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/comm/communicationfile-58552.pdf
(January 22, 2016) Submission from Peter Mandronis (LS.New.LS9.4.5)
(January 22, 2016) Submission from Hayley Steinhart (LS.New.LS9.4.6)

Communications (City Council)

(December 22, 2015) Letter from Michael Binetti, Affleck Greene McMurty LLP, Barristers and Solicitors (CC.Main.LS9.4.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58579.pdf
(February 1, 2016) Letter from The Honourable Harvey Spiegel Q.C., Legal Counsel, Toronto Taxi Alliance (CC.Supp.LS9.4.8)
(February 2, 2016) Letter from Michael Binetti, Affleck Greene McMurtry LLP, Barristers and Solicitors (CC.Supp.LS9.4.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58750.pdf
(February 2, 2016) Letter from Murray Teitel, Barrister (CC.New.LS9.4.10)
(February 3, 2016) E-mail from Harvey Spiegel Q.C. submitted by Councillor Jim Karygiannis, Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt (CC.New.LS9.4.11)
(February 3, 2016) E-mail from from Peter Rosenthal, Barrister, submitted by Councillor Jim Karygiannis, Ward 39 Scarborough-Agincourt (CC.New.LS9.4.12)

LS9.8 - Proposed Federal-Provincial-Territorial Task Force on Legalization and Regulations of Marijuana

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the City Manager to write to the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada requesting that the City of Toronto be included as a participant in the proposed federal-provincial-territorial task force on the legalization and regulation of marijuana to ensure that the City's interests are addressed, including ensuring that the permitted locations for the selling of marijuana is appropriate and recognizes the need for appropriate distance requirements to other uses such as schools, daycares, residences, etc.

Origin

(January 22, 2016) Letter from Councillor Jim Karygiannis

Summary

Letter from Councillor Jim Karygiannis on participation of the City of Toronto in the proposed federal-provincial-territorial task force on the legalization and regulation of marijuana.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 22, 2016) Letter from Councillor Jim Karygiannis on Proposed Federal-provincial-territorial Task Force on the legalization and regulation of marijuana
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-88536.pdf

LS9.9 - Taxicab and Ground Transportation Industry

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council reaffirm its direction to the Executive Director of Municipal Licensing and Standards that any new rules regarding the taxicab and ground transportation industry be identical; for example, fare structure, safety features, and assuring that there is no distinction between rules for street hails, pre-arranged fares by any other means.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

This item was considered with Items LS9.4, LS9.5, LS9.6 and LS9.7.

Origin

(January 22, 2016) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti

Summary

The Executive Director of Licensing and Standards is currently drafting new rules to regulate the Taxi Cab and ground Transportation Industry.

 

This review is expected to be completed within the next couple of months and I feel that it is important that this Committee and Council reaffirm the direction it gave to the Executive Director of Licensing and Standards in anticipation of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 22, 2016) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti on Taxi Cab and Ground Transportation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-88537.pdf

Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 9

PE9.1 - Music and Arts in Parks Permits - Sign Related Amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 608

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 124 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the temporary sign related amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 608, Parks contained in Attachment A to the report (December 31, 2015) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, subject to any necessary minor substantive or stylistic refinements as may be identified by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council approve the guidelines for temporary signage in parks as outlined in Attachment B to the report (December 31, 2015) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

3.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to incorporate public consultation on signage in parks into the ongoing consultation on commercial special events and report back to the Parks and Environment Committee by the end of 2016.

Origin

(December 31, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

In implementing the "Arts in the Parks" and "Music in the Parks" initiatives, it has been identified that the Municipal Code does not provide Parks, Forestry and Recreation (PF&R) explicit authority to allow any temporary signage in any park. This limits the potential of success for "Arts in the Park" and "Music in the Parks" initiatives, but also restricts the current/historic practice of allowing signage for certain events under the conditions of a permit.

 

This report recommends an amendment to the Municipal Code, Chapter 608, Parks, to provide explicit authority to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to allow temporary signage in accordance with a set of guidelines. These guidelines detail the current and historic practice, while creating a new specific approach for the "Arts in the Parks" and "Music in the Parks" category. The current practice aligns with the authorities provided for special events within the Transportation and Economic Development Divisions while the proposed guidelines for "Arts in the Parks" and "Music in the Parks" align with the Open Space signage regulations in the Municipal Code.

 

Parks, Forestry and Recreation is in the process of developing a public consultation strategy to inform the division and Council with respect to Commercial Special Events and will incorporate further consultation on temporary signage in the City's parks, as requested by Council and the Parks and Environment Committee. Parks, Forestry and Recreation will report back by the end of 2016 with the results of the consultation and any recommended changes to these programs and guidelines, as appropriate.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 31, 2015) Report and Attachments A to C from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Music and Arts in Parks Permits - Sign Related Amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 608
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-87197.pdf
Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-87214.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(January 14, 2016) E-mail from Alison Juda, Administrative Assistant/Coordinator, Mimico by the Lake Business Improvement Area (PE.New.PE9.1.1)

PE9.3 - Amendments to Joint City of Toronto/Toronto Hydro Solar Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the following amendments to the City of Toronto/Toronto Hydro solar photovoltaic (PV) program on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor:

 

a.  Toronto Hydro will no longer co-invest in solar PV projects on City-owned facilities;

 

b.  Toronto Hydro act as the construction manager, which will include procurement responsibilities, for the City's solar PV installations, including small systems to be installed under the Provincial microFIT program.

 

2.  City Council authorize City investments in solar PV installations on facilities owned by City agencies and corporations.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Parks and Environment Committee recommended that the Budget Committee, as part of the 2016 Budget Process, recommend that:

 

1.  City Council approve an increase of the 2016-2025 Preliminary Capital Budget for Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and Energy (FREEE) by $7.95 million, $1.75 million in 2016 and $6.2 million commitments in 2017 funded by recoverable debt;

 

2.  City Council approve future year commitments of $13.2 million of which $7 million is an estimate in the 2016-2025 Preliminary Capital Budget and Plan and an additional $6.2 million is requested, resulting in a zero gross and net impacting in a zero gross and net impact.

Origin

(December 17, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report recommends changes to the existing Council-approved City of Toronto/ Toronto Hydro solar photovoltaic (PV) program.  As a result of changes to the Province's Feed-in Tariff (FIT) program, Toronto Hydro is no longer able to co-invest in PV installations on City-owned facilities.  The City's investment share in projects on City sites will increase from 51 percent to 100 percent.  The report also recommends that the City be allowed to invest in installations on sites owned by Toronto Hydro and other City agencies and corporations.

 

Under the proposed changes, Toronto Hydro will continue in its role as construction manager for PV installations, as well as procuring the necessary equipment for these installations.  Toronto Hydro may also undertake these roles for installations on small City facilities under the microFIT program.

 

The report also identifies future opportunities for solar installations, such as solar carports on City-owned parking lots, and on "net-zero" buildings, which generate more energy than they consume.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 17, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Amendments to Joint City of Toronto/Toronto Hydro Solar Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-87092.pdf

Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 9

PG9.3 - 170 and 194 Evans Avenue - Ontario Municipal Board Appeal - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG9.3a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to continue the City's appeal of the Etobicoke York Committee of Adjustment panel's approval of the Minor Variance application (A228/15EYK) for the lands municipally known as 170 and 194 Evans Avenue.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the Minor Variance decision as approved by the Committee of Adjustment.

 

3.  City Council direct the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to request that the parties enter into mediation at the Ontario Municipal Board to try to resolve the appeal.

 

4. City Council confirm that minor variance applications to allow uses not permitted in Employment Areas are inappropriate as they do not meet the general purpose and intent of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Origin

(December 23, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

At its meeting on September 30, October 1 and 2, 2015, City Council referred Item EY8.76 (Ontario Municipal Board – 170 and 194 Evans Avenue Minor Variance Approval) to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and directed the Chief Planner to report to the January 20, 2016 meeting of Planning and Growth Management Committee.

 

170 and 194 Evans Avenue is designated Employment Areas and zoned for employment uses.  In June 2015, the Committee of Adjustment approved an application to permit private school, day nursery and outdoor play area uses within the existing building on the site, as well as a reduced setback for parking for a period of twenty years, to June 2035. 

 

Both City Planning and Economic Development and Culture submitted reports to the Committee of Adjustment recommending that the application be refused.  Subsequent to the Committee's decision and in accordance with the standing direction (ED33.9, Recommendation No. 2) to appeal any Committee of Adjustment decision that does not conform with the Official Plan Employment Areas policies, the City Solicitor filed an appeal of the decision to the OMB.

 

A hearing date has not yet been scheduled.  On September 8, 2015, the school started its operations at the subject site.  It is staff's understanding that the day nursery is not yet in operation.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 23, 2015) Report and Attachments 1 - 6 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 170 and 194 Evans Avenue - Ontario Municipal Board Appeal - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-87723.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(January 28, 2016) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on 170 and 194 Evans Avenue - Ontario Municipal Board Appeal - Further Request for Direction (PG9.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88781.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

Speakers

David Hardy, Vice President, Industry & Government Relations, William F. White International
Laura Dean, Transmetro Limited
Lori Priolo, Principal, Phoenix Montessori School

Communications (Committee)

(January 19, 2016) Letter from Sidonia J. Loiacono, Aird & Berlis LLP, representing Transmetro Limited (PG.New.PG9.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-58426.pdf
(January 19, 2016) Letter from Lori Priolo, Principal, Phoenix Montessori School (PG.New.PG9.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-58371.pdf
(January 19, 2016) Letter from Al Brezina, Executive Director, South Etobicoke Industrial Employers' Association (SEIEA) (PG.New.PG9.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-58373.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(February 3, 2016) Petition from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore headed "Let Phoenix Stay at 170 Evans Avenue", containing the names of approximately 930 persons, filed during the Routine Matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)

PG9.7 - City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT Corridor - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 25 - Don Valley West, 26 - Don Valley West, 34 - Don Valley East, 35 - Scarborough Southwest, 37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Communications PG9.7.2 and PG9.7.3 have been submitted on this Item

Bill 106 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 1031-2014 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendments attached as Attachment 2 to the report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning dated January 4, 2016; and

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to include Build Toronto as a commenting agency on the site plan control applications submitted by Metrolinx and/or the Crosslinx Transit Solution related to transit infrastructure required for 1250 Eglinton Avenue East, the south west corner of Yonge-Eglinton and the north east, south west and south east corners of Don Mills and Eglinton.

 

The Planning and Growth Management Committee held a statutory public meeting on January 20, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 4, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This application proposes to amend the current City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86, the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, the former City of Scarborough Zoning By-law No’s. 9276, 9089 and 24982, the former Borough of East York (former Town of Leaside) Zoning By-law No. 1916 and the former City of York Zoning By-Law No. 1-83, respecting regulations applicable to buildings that are used for the operation of a transit system along Eglinton Avenue West and East between Jane Street and Midland Avenue.

 

The purpose of this proposed amendment is to provide relief from the various Zoning By-laws for minor exceedances of applicable development standards for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT station buildings, the Eglinton Maintenance Storage Facility (MSF) and Traction Power Sub-stations (TPSS).  These lands are also subject to development applications for Site Plan Control Approval. 

 

A previous Zoning By-law Amendment was approved by City Council in 2014 (By-law No. 1031-2014) which provided relief to the Zoning By-laws for minor variances to existing performance standards.  It is currently under appeal at the OMB.  The current amendment is required because this by-law and some development standards were not addressed in By-law No. 1031-2014.

 

This amendment would apply to buildings used for transit purposes only, such as the stations, MSF and TPSS.  It will not apply to future non-transit development at these sites.  Any such non-transit development would be subject to the normal development review process and all applicable zoning by-laws.

 

Requirements for all of the development standards which would be controlled by the Zoning By-law (setbacks, heights, parking, etc.) have been included in Metrolinx’s Project Specific Output Specification (PSOS).  This document forms the basis of the contract between Metrolinx and the consortium chosen to build the LRT (Crosslinx Transit Solutions) and is binding on the constructor. The provisions in the PSOS are consistent with the vision established for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT corridor by the Eglinton Connects Planning Study and generally with the zoning requirements in the existing by-laws. 

 

Planning staff are of the opinion the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is appropriate, poses no risk of permitting inappropriate development and will facilitate the implementation of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT transit station buildings and facilities.  Additionally, the PSOS provides for the protection of the City's standards. 

Background Information (Committee)

(January 4, 2016) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on City Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application for the Eglinton Crosstown LRT Corridor - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-87247.pdf
Attachment 2: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-87701.pdf
(December 23, 2015) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-87246.pdf

Speakers

Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident & Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CORRA)

Communications (Committee)

(January 19, 2016) Letter from Carlo Bonnani, Vice President, Land and Development Planning, Build Toronto (PG.New.PG9.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/comm/communicationfile-58497.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(February 1, 2016) Letter from Stephen Diamond, President and Chief Executive Officer, Diamond Corporation (CC.Supp.PG9.7.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58767.pdf
(February 2, 2016) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG9.7.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58790.pdf

PG9.9 - Proposed Modification and Settlement of Appeal to Policy 1(b) of Section 3.5.1 of OPA 231

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the proposed modification to Policy 1(b) of Section 3.5.1 of OPA 231 as shown in Attachment 1 to the report (December 29, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.  City Council direct City Planning and Legal staff to bring the adopted modification as the basis of a partial settlement to the OMB for approval.

Origin

(December 29, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report outlines a recommended policy modification to Official Plan Amendment No. 231, specifically Policy 1 (b) of Section 3.5.1, which if adopted by Council will resolve the appeal by Morguard Investment Limited/Revenue Properties Company Limited.  The representative for the appellant has confirmed that upon adoption of the policy modification by Council shown in Attachment 1 to this report the appeal will be resolved as it pertains to this policy.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 29, 2015) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Proposed Modification and Settlement of Appeal to Policy 1(b) of Section 3.5.1 of OPA 231
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-87248.pdf

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 10

PW10.1 - Options for Permitting Street or Intersection Murals on Local Streets

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Communications PW10.1.43 and PW10.1.44 have been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council permit the installation of up to four mid-block pilot street murals on low volume, local streets during existing street events which include permitted road closures in summer 2016 on condition that the pilot projects meet the following requirements:

 

a.  Each street mural is to be developed by and be the responsibility of local community groups;

 

b.  Community consultation on design is undertaken and support from local residents on the murals is demonstrated to the General Manager, Transportation Services;

 

c.  The full cost of design, community consultation, installation, and ongoing maintenance is incurred entirely by the community group, with no cost to the City of Toronto;

 

d.  Designs, project materials and location suitability is reviewed and approved by the General Manager, Transportation Services during the design process and in advance of installation;

 

e.  Transportation Services is to conduct traffic safety reviews before and after installation and has the authority to remove any installations found to diminish road safety; and

 

f.  The General Manager, Transportation Services consider establishing a practical life span for street murals, at the end of which the mural will be evaluated, and considered for removal or replacement through a new project.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to review the bylaws, policies  and practices in other municipalities and report back, in the fourth quarter of 2016, after consultation with the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee, to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee with findings and policy options for the City of Toronto.

Origin

(October 22, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

In July 2015, City staff were directed to examine the implications of a potential new Street Mural program, whereby local residents are granted permission to paint murals on the asphalt road surface of city streets. City Staff have investigated these projects in other cities, reviewed potential requirements in the City of Toronto, and do not recommend pursuing a new Street Mural program at this time.

 

While street murals do offer a community-building impact, they place considerable administrative, regulatory, and maintenance burdens on the City. Based on case study research, street murals provide no tangible traffic safety benefits. 

 

City staff instead propose that during community road closures with appropriate approvals, communities are free to create temporary street murals with chalk or other materials that are naturally removed by the elements. This approach would provide community building impacts at no cost to the City and essentially no added risk to motorists or the artists.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 22, 2015) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Options for Permitting Street or Intersection Murals on Local Streets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-87259.pdf
(November 12, 2015) Decision Letter from Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Item PW9.12 - Options for Permitting Street or Intersection Murals on Local Streets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-87670.pdf

Speakers

Gerry Brown
Barbara Mathews
Dave Meslin
Melissa Frew
Councillor Cesar Palacio
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Frances Nunziata

Communications (Committee)

(November 9, 2015) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio (PW.Main.PW10.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-57936.pdf
(November 10, 2015) Letter from Dylan Reid, Walk Toronto (PW.Main.PW10.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-57937.pdf
(November 11, 2015) E-mail from Brandon Quigley (PW.Main.PW10.1.3)
(January 11, 2016) E-mail from Trish O’Reilly-Brennan for the Safety Committee, Pocket Community Association (PW.Main.PW10.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-57991.pdf
(January 14, 2016) E-mail from Barbara Mathews (PW.New.PW10.1.5)
(January 14, 2016) E-mail from Linda Genova (PW.New.PW10.1.6)
(January 14, 2016) E-mail from Margaret Smith (PW.New.PW10.1.7)
(January 14, 2016) E-mail from Joshua Engel-Yan (PW.New.PW10.1.8)
(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Emily Servais (PW.New.PW10.1.9)
(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Gord Restivo (PW.New.PW10.1.10)
(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Harry Lay (PW.New.PW10.1.11)
(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Steve Gibbons (PW.New.PW10.1.12)
(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Janet Oswald (PW.New.PW10.1.13)
(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Anthony Rovito (PW.New.PW10.1.14)
(January 16, 2016) E-mail from Glenda MacFarlane (PW.New.PW10.1.15)
(January 16, 2016) E-mail from Rose Rodrigues (PW.New.PW10.1.16)
(January 16, 2016) E-mail from Jacob Allderdice (PW.New.PW10.1.17)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Laura McBride, Sales Representative, Sutton Group - Heritage Realty Inc and Custom Landscape Designer, Sheridan Nurseries Ltd (PW.New.PW10.1.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-58183.pdf
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Barbara Neilson (PW.New.PW10.1.19)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from David Reid (PW.New.PW10.1.20)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Grace Mandarano (PW.New.PW10.1.21)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Jamie Chow (PW.New.PW10.1.22)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Barbara D Mathews (PW.New.PW10.1.23)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from John Keating (PW.New.PW10.1.24)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Anne Andriash (PW.New.PW10.1.25)
(January 19, 2016) E-mail from Kelsey Carriere (PW.New.PW10.1.26)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Stella Dahlin (PW.New.PW10.1.27)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Lars Boggild (PW.New.PW10.1.28)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Mary Anne Quance (PW.New.PW10.1.29)
(January 19, 2016) E-mail from Philippa French (PW.New.PW10.1.30)
(January 19, 2016) E-mail from Kevin Johnston (PW.New.PW10.1.31)
(January 19, 2016) E-mail from Taras Worona (PW.New.PW10.1.32)
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Lisa Roosen-Runge (PW.New.PW10.1.33)
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Taylor Surajram, Product and Community Coordinator, EF Educational Tours (PW.New.PW10.1.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-58494.pdf
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Caitlin Colson (PW.New.PW10.1.35)
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Dylan Reid, Walk Toronto (PW.New.PW10.1.36)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-58509.pdf
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Florence Watts, Regal Heights Residents' Association (PW.New.PW10.1.37)
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Gay Stephenson (PW.New.PW10.1.38)
(January 21, 2016) E-mail from Joe Travers (PW.New.PW10.1.39)
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Gerry Dunn (PW.New.PW10.1.40)
(January 20, 2016) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio (PW.New.PW10.1.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-58515.pdf
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Gillian Rodrigues (PW.New.PW10.1.42)

Communications (City Council)

(January 24, 2016) E-mail from Kara Isozaki (CC.Main.PW.1.43)
(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Alice Dixon (CC.Main.PW.1.44)

PW10.2 - Undertaking Construction of Utility Infrastructure to Support the Six Points Interchange Reconfiguration

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to negotiate and enter into any required agreements with affected utility companies, to undertake the expansion and relocation of utilities required for the Six Points Interchange Reconfiguration Project on terms acceptable to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to execute any agreements negotiated on behalf of the City.

Origin

(January 5, 2016) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services

Summary

This report seeks authority for the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to negotiate and enter into any required agreements with utility companies on behalf of the City of Toronto for the relocation and the expansion of utility's infrastructure through construction contracts managed by the City in support of the Six Points Interchange Reconfiguration Project.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 5, 2016) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Undertaking Construction of Utility Infrastructure to Support the Six Points Interchange Reconfiguration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-87215.pdf

PW10.5 - Proposed Amendments to the Sewers and Water Supply By-laws

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 103 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 681-Sewers and Municipal Code Chapter 851–Water Supply substantially in accordance with the draft amending By-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (January 5, 2016) from the General Manager, Toronto Water.

Origin

(January 5, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

Summary

This report recommends the adoption of amendments to the City of Toronto's Municipal Code Chapter 681- Sewers ("Sewers By-law") and Municipal Code Chapter 851- Water Supply By-law ("Water Supply By-law"), which will introduce:

 

-  zero tolerance for pesticides discharges;

-  new reporting protocols for dental amalgam separators;

-  a new environmental code of practice for food service establishments;

-  a Best Management Practice (BMP) for automotive refinishing sector and combining it into one BMP for automotive servicing facilities; and

-  clarifications and enhancements to each By-law.

 

At its meeting of December 9 and 10, 2015, City Council referred Recommendation Number 1 of the staff report titled Sewers By-Law Pollution Prevention (P2) Program Stakeholder Update – 2015 and Sewers and Water Supply By-law Amendments to the General Manager, Toronto Water, to report back on a risk based approach to minimum reporting thresholds for subject pollutants, including evaluating the use of existing storm water limits.

 

However, Recommendation Number 1 inadvertently included other amendments (as listed above) to Chapters 681 and 851 (Sewers and Water Supply By-laws) unrelated to the issue of minimum reporting thresholds of subject pollutants. Staff recommend that these amendments be adopted prior to reporting back on a risk based approach to minimum reporting thresholds as it will result in reduced pollution to our wastewater treatment system, bring clarity to provisions in our by-laws and improve operational efficiency and customer service.

 

Appendix A contains these proposed By-law amendments for City Council approval. Toronto Water will report back, at a later date, on a risk based approach to minimum reporting thresholds and any proposed amendments related to the proposed creation of a subject pollutant threshold reporting list.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 5, 2016) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Proposed Amendments to the Sewers and Water Supply By-laws
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-87265.pdf
Appendix A: Amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 681 - Sewers and Municipal Code Chapter 851 - Water Supply
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-87266.pdf
Appendix B: Explanation of Amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 681- Sewers and Municipal Code Chapter 851-Water Supply
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-87267.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(January 20, 2016) E-mail from Richard Lyall, President, RESCON and Danielle Chin MCIP RPP, Senior Manager, Policy & Government Relations, BILD (PW.New.PW10.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/pw/comm/communicationfile-58517.pdf

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 11

EY11.1 - Final Report - 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue- Residential Rental Demolition and Conversion Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the application for a Section 111 permit to demolish 6 residential rental dwelling units and 4 residential dwelling units pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of rental housing as outlined in the December 15, 2015 report from the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District:

a.  The owner shall provide and maintain six (6) rental replacement units, consisting of: two (2) affordable three bedroom units and one (1) affordable one bedroom unit for a period of at least ten (10) years from the date of first occupancy of those units; and one (1) one bedroom and two (2) two bedroom units of unlimited rents. These units must be maintained as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, and located on the subject site as shown on the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated October 23, 2015, with any revisions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

b.  The owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance to all eligible tenants, including financial assistance beyond the minimums of the Residential Tenancies Act and the right of tenants of the affordable units to return to a replacement rental unit. These requirements will be outlined in a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

c.  The owner shall enter into and register on title one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in (a) and (b) above to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

d.  The owner shall enter into and register on title, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the 6 replacement rental units, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Section 111 Agreement.

2.  City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue the Section 111 permit to the applications for demolition for the rental units in 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the following has occurred:

a.  Satisfaction or securing of the conditions in Part 1 above.

 

b.  The Draft Zoning By-law Amendment that is before the Ontario Municipal Board is confirmed, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to be in final form.

 

c.  After the execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act securing the conditions in Part 1 (a-d) above.

 

d.  The issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for the site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

3.  City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The applicant has submitted an application for a Section 111 permit to demolish 6 residential rental units, out of a total of 10 residential units in one detached and four semi-detached houses at 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code, pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act. The proposal is to replace the demolished units with 6 replacement rental units to be wholly on the site in a 5 storey residential building approved for the lands.  The proposed units are to be located in two clusters in a condominium building.

 

A Zoning By-law Amendment application for the proposed redevelopment was appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on August 11, 2014.  In late August, 2014, City Council directed staff to settle the appeals with the applicant and to determine the requirements of demolition permissions under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, if necessary.

 

An application for a Section 111 permit, pursuant to Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code has been made for the 6 residential rental units on the site.

 

This report provides the results of the determination on the rental housing matters, and recommends the approval of a Section 111 permit under Chapter 667 and Chapter 363 of the Municipal Code for the demolition of the 6 existing rental units, subject to conditions.  The conditions include the replacement of the 6 rental units and the provision of tenant assistance for all tenants, including the right for tenants of the three affordable units to return to occupy a rental unit in the new building.  This report recommends entering into an Agreement under Section 111 to secure these conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Residential Rental Demolition and Conversion Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667- Final Report - 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-86863.pdf

EY11.2 - Request for Direction Report - 289 and 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 and 7 St. Stevens Court - Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application at 289 and 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 and 7 St. Stevens Court (Application Number 13 164210 WET 04 OZ).

 

2.  City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to negotiate an appropriate development proposal for these lands.

 

3.  In the event the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its Order approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until: 

a.  The owner submits, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report.

 

b.  Staff advise the Ontario Municipal Board of City Council's position that any redevelopment of the lands must also include the full replacement of the 156 existing rental dwelling units and a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, including the right of tenants to return to the new rental units in accordance with the Official Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

c.  The owner enters into an Agreement under Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure appropriate services, facilities, public art contribution and/or other matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act at the owner's expense:

i.  An appropriate Section 37 community benefit contribution be secured as discussed in the report (December 16, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

ii.  The following matters are also recommended to be secured for the development in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience: 

  The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009.

 

  The owner shall enter into a financially secured Development Agreement for the construction of any improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development.

 

  The owner shall enter into agreement(s) to secure the conditions of a Council-approved Section 111 permit and any conditions of Part 3b above. 

d.  The City and the owner have presented to the Board a draft Zoning By-law Amendment and the owner has entered into and registered a Section 37 Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, that includes the provision for the community benefits and matters to be secured as noted in Part 3c above. 

4.  City Council request the Applicant to submit a revised Traffic Impact Study, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Origin

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes the replacement of five existing 3.5 storey rental apartment buildings located at 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 and 7 St. Stevens Court with six new residential apartment buildings ranging in height from 6 to 16 storeys. The 156 existing rental units at these addresses are proposed to be replaced.  A 17-storey 73 unit rental apartment building located at 289 The Kingsway would be retained. 

 

An associated Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application (13 164266 WET 04 RH) was also submitted under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act to demolish the existing five, 3.5-storey buildings pursuant to Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code. 

 

The owner has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing City Council's failure to render a decision within the time frame prescribed by the Planning Act. 

 

The City's decision on Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion applications is not subject to appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment application, as currently proposed by the applicant.

 

The proposal in its current form is inappropriate and represents over-development of the site.  The proposal does not comply with a number of development criteria in the Official Plan or the Etobicoke Zoning Code.  The proposed height, density and scale is not compatible with the existing context of the local apartment neighbourhood and would result in unacceptable impacts on abutting lands.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Applications - Request for Direction Report - 289 and 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 and 7 St. Stevens Court
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87028.pdf

Speakers

Joanne Pickard, Humber Valley Village Board of Directors (Submission Filed)
Shawn Coston (Submission Filed)
Karina Janowski
Jeremy Skinner
Phyllis Grady
Patrick Devine, Devine Park LLP
Sean Allman, Managing Principal, Synergy Partners
Anne Anderson, Director of Communications, Humber Valley Village Residents Association
Dawn Juruc

Communications (Community Council)

(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Jeremy Skinner (EY.New.EY11.2.1)
(January 19, 2016) Letter from Joanne Pickard, Vice President, Humber Valley Village Residents' Association (EY.New.EY11.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-58504.pdf
(April 7, 2014) Submission from Shawn Coston, forwarding approximately 82 form letters signed by tenants in the apartment neighbourhood of 289 and 291 The Kingsway and 1, 3, 5 and 7 St. Stevens Court (EY.New.EY.11.2.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/comm/communicationfile-58525.pdf

EY11.12 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 147 Duncanwoods Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West
Attention
Communication EY11.12.1 has been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 147 Duncanwoods Drive.

Origin

(December 4, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report recommends that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 147 Duncanwoods Drive. The owner is requesting removal to address concerns that dripping sap is causing property damage and that fallen needles are clogging eaves troughs. Tree health and maintenance costs have also been identified as concerns.

 

The subject tree is an Austrian pine (Pinus nigra) measuring 51 cm in diameter. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 4, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation regarding an Application to Remove a Private Tree - 147 Duncanwoods Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-86577.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(January 27, 2016) Letter from Diana Faoro-Morlando (CC.Main.EY11.12.1)

EY11.13 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 19 Feltham Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree at 19 Feltham Avenue, with a condition that the applicant provide three (3) replacement trees, as shown in the revised planting plan from Davey Tree Expert Co. of Canada Limited.

Origin

(December 4, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located in the side yard of 19 Feltham Avenue. The application indicates the reasons for removal are to address concerns that the tree is causing property damage from dripping sap and eaves troughs are being clogged by dropping needles and cones. Concern over the presence of carpenter ants has also been raised.

 

The subject tree is a Norway spruce (Picea abies) measuring 65 cm in diameter. Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 4, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation regarding an Application to Remove a Private Tree - 19 Feltham Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-86597.pdf
Revised Planting Plan from Davey Tree Expert Co. of Canada Limited (as attached to the motion by Councillor Frances Nunziata).
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-88404.pdf

Speakers

Cam Irvine

EY11.29 - Permanent Closure of the Portion of Algoma Street Extending Easterly from Grand Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 75 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the permanent closure of the portion of Algoma Street extending easterly from Grand Avenue, being the whole of PIN 07622-0021 (LT), and shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2012-076 (the "Highway"), attached to the report dated December 9, 2015, from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.  City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report dated  December 9, 2015, from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  Notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notice Page of the City's website.

Origin

(December 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District

Summary

Transportation Services recommends that the portion of Algoma Street, extending easterly from Grand Avenue be permanently closed for operational transfer to Parks, Forestry and Recreation in order to consolidate City-owned lands in the immediate area for the creation of a park.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District regarding a Permanent Closure of the Portion of Algoma Street Extending Easterly from Grand Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87032.pdf
Appendix A - Draft By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87033.pdf
Sketch No. PS-2012-076, dated July 27, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87034.pdf

EY11.31 - Right Turn Prohibition - Gardiner Eastbound Off-Ramp at Park Lawn Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council approve the addition of travel time information to the Message Sign on the Gardiner Expressway, west of Kipling Avenue, advising motorists of the travel time to downtown (Yonge Street) via Park Lawn Road and Lake Shore Boulevard West.

 

2.  City Council request Transportation Services staff to conduct studies at an appropriate time following the addition of the Travel Time Message signs to determine the traffic impact on the Park Lawn Road/Lake Shore Boulevard West route.

Origin

(December 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to comment on the request from Etobicoke York Community Council at the meeting on November 10, 2015, to investigate the feasibility of restricting southbound (right) turns onto Park Lawn Road from the eastbound exit of the Gardiner Expressway, between 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday for the duration of the rehabilitation of the Gardiner Expressway. (Anticipated completion October 31, 2016)

 

As a result of our studies, considering the significant impact of prohibiting right turns from the Gardiner Expressway eastbound exit ramp onto Park Lawn Road, staff recommend as an alternate option the addition of travel information onto the existing message sign on the Gardiner Expressway, west of Kipling Avenue, to advise motorists of predicted travel time if they use Park Lawn Road to Lake Shore Boulevard West.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on the subject streets, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding a Right Turn Prohibition - Gardiner Eastbound Off-Ramp at Park Lawn Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87045.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87046.pdf

EY11.36 - Traffic Control Signals - Weston Road and Mainshep Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at Weston Road and Mainshep Road.

Origin

(December 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of traffic control signals on Weston Road and Mainshep Road.

 

The installation of traffic control signals is justified as Traffic Control Signal Warrant requirements are achieved. The installation of traffic control signals will provide a safe and convenient access for vehicles and pedestrians crossing Weston Road.

 

Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) provides bus service on Weston Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding Traffic Control Signals - Weston Road and Mainshep Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87035.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87036.pdf

EY11.43 - Accessible Parking Spaces - Etobicoke York District - January 2016 (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport
Attention
Bill 93 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the removal of the on-street accessible parking space at the location identified in Appendix A attached to the report dated December 16, 2015, from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.

Origin

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the removal of an on-street accessible parking space for persons with disabilities.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject street, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District regarding Accessible Parking Spaces - Etobicoke York District - January 2016 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87043.pdf

EY11.50 - Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence - Big Rock Brewery - By the Glass Limited Licence

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario of its support of the application from Big Rock Brewery, 1589 The Queensway, for a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence for sales by the glass. 

Origin

(January 7, 2016) Letter from Councillor Justin Di Ciano, Ward 5, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Summary

I received a request from the Chief Financial Officer of Big Rock Brewery, located at 1589 The Queensway, advising that in order to obtain a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence, a resolution from the local Municipal Council is required. In addition, I was advised that the resolution be in support of the issuance of the licence. which allows for a "sales by the glass" permit during the hours of 11 am 9 pm.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 7, 2016) Letter from Councillor Justin Di Ciano, Ward 5, Etobicoke-Lakeshore regarding Big Rock Brewery - By the Glass Limited Licence.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87286.pdf

EY11.51 - 64-70 Cordova Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment to Revise Section 37 Provisions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 112 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council delete Section 3(a)(ii) from Item EY34.2 and substitute the following Section 3(a)(ii) instead:

 

" prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for Development Phase 1, the owner shall provide a cash contribution in the amount of $400,000 towards the capital rehabilitation and upgrading of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) buildings at 4995 Dundas Street West and 57 Mabelle Avenue and/or common amenity space upgrades a 4995 Dundas Street West and 57 Mabelle Avenue" and or the proposed new YMCA at Westwood/6 points.

 

2.  City Council delete Sections 3(a)(iii) and 3(a)(iv) from Item EY34.2 and substitute the following Section 3(a)(iii) instead:

 

"prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for Development Phase 2, the owner shall provide a cash contribution in the amount of $925,000 to be directed in consultation with the Ward Councillor as follows:

 

A.  $350,000 towards the capital rehabilitation and upgrading of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) buildings at 4995 Dundas Street West and 57 Mabelle A venue; and

 

B.  $575,000 towards the capital needs of a future YMCA facility proposed to be located on the former Westwood Theatre lands and/or towards the installation of a proposed Westwood Park in the 6-Points area."

 

3.  City Council renumber Sections 3(a)(v) and 3(a)(vi) of Item EY34.2 as Sections 3(a)(iv) and 3(a)(v).

 

4.  City Council determine that the revisions made to the proposed zoning by-law are minor in nature and, pursuant to subsection 34( I 7) of the Planning Act, no further public notice is required in respect or the proposed zoning by-law.

Origin

(January 14, 2016) Letter from Councillor Justin Di Ciano, Ward 5, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Summary

On July 8, 2014, City Council adopted item EY34.2, thereby approving the recommendations of the Report of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District to enact a proposed zoning by-law amendment. The development proposal, located at the intersection of Islington and Cordova A venues, proposes 1,200 residential units in three apartment towers of 45, 38 and 35 storeys, together with 711 m2 of retail space. Council's approval directed that the contribution of $1,575,000 under section 37 of the Planning Act be allocated to a specified range of community benefits. The purpose of this Motion is to revise the proposed allocation of the funds and to advance the timing for contribution of certain of the funds. (Item EY34.2 is available at:

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2014.EY34.2)

 

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 14, 2016) Letter from Councillor Justin Di Ciano, Ward 5, Etobicoke-Lakeshore - 64-70 Cordova Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment to Revise Section 37 Provisions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-87725.pdf

EY11.52 - Request for Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 9 Atherton Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor, City Planning, and any other appropriate City Staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for Case # PL151216 to support the Committee of Adjustment’s refusal of the requested consent and variances for 9 Atherton Crescent.

Origin

(January 19, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Summary

The owners of the land municipally known as 9 Atherton Crescent applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent to sever (Application B29/15EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A252/15EYK, A253/15EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings with integral garages.

 

City Planning staff prepared a report recommending refusal, and the local community and I submitted concerns that the variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, or the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood.

 

On September 24, 2015, the Committee refused the consent and minor variances.

 

The COA’s decision has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (Case Number: PL151216), however, a hearing date has not been scheduled.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 19, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore requesting attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 9 Atherton Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-88299.pdf
(September 24, 2015) Committee of Adjustment Decisions - 9 Atherton Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-88407.pdf

EY11.53 - Request to Appeal Committee of Adjustment Decision to Ontario Municipal Board - 56 Ash Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Communication EY11.53.1 has been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the January 14, 2016 Committee of Adjustment decision to approve the consent and minor variances at 56 Ash Crescent (Applications B72/15EYK, A646/15EYK, A647/15EYK) to the Ontario Municipal Board, and the City Solicitor and any other appropriate staff attend the subsequent hearing in opposition to consent and minor variance applications.

Origin

(January 19, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Summary

The owners of the land municipally known as 56 Ash Crescent applied to the Committee of Adjustment (COA) to obtain a consent to sever (Application B72/15EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A646/15EYK, A647/15EYK) in order to build two new detached two-storey dwellings with integral, at-grade single-car parking garages.

 

There has been a proliferation of consent and variance application in the historic neighbourhood of Long Branch over the past few years. It is a highly desirable area with large, leafy lots, heritage homes, and cottage-country charm, but these lot severances and new modern homes are spoiling that character. I am currently working on Neighbourhood Design Guidelines for Long Branch, but until the guidelines are in place each new approval erodes the integrity of our neighbourhood.

 

The consent and variances for 56 Ash Crescent are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, or the predominant physical character of the street and surrounding neighbourhood. Long Branch residents write letters and attend COA meetings, but they feel their voices are not being heard. At the January 14, 2016 COA meeting, City Planning Staff and I recommended deferral to allow for a community consultation to discuss the built form of the proposed homes, but that request was denied.

 

Consent and variance applications were recently submitted for two other properties on Ash Crescent, including one directly next door to 56 Ash Crescent. The applications for both of these properties were refused by the COA. The decision to approve 56 Ash Crescent is inconsistent with previous rulings on the same street.

 

I am requesting that the City of Toronto appeal the January 14, 2016 COA decision to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), and that City planning, City Legal, and any other appropriate City Staff attend the OMB hearing to oppose the COA decision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 19, 2016) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore requesting an Appeal of the Committee of Adjustment Decision to Ontario Municipal Board - 56 Ash Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-88473.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(January 14, 2016) Submission from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore - Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Consent and Minor Variance/Permission for 56 Ash Crescent (CC.Main.EY11.53.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58620.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 11

NY11.12 - Traffic Safety Study - Steeles Avenue West and Torresdale Avenue/Thurman Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct Transportation Services to proceed with the improvements to the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Torresdale Avenue/Thurman Road as follows:

 

a. centre median extensions on the west and east leg;

 

b. relocate the existing pedestrian crossings outward on the west and east leg;

 

c. relocate/install pedestrian pushbuttons adjacent to the north/south crossings; and

 

d. review the location of the existing transit shelter on the southwest corner of the intersection behind the existing sidewalk.

Origin

(December 2, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission operates a transit service on Steeles Avenue West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is seeking direction from City Council to modify the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Torresdale Avenue/Thurman Road, in order to address the concerns of the Ward Councillor and residents by extending the centre medians, relocating the existing crosswalk area on the west and east side of the intersection and relocate the existing pedestrian pushbuttons as required.

 

The reconfiguration of the centre medians, in conjunction with the relocation of the existing north/south crossing area and traffic signal plant (pedestrian pushbuttons) modifications will improve the overall operation of the intersection for pedestrians.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 13, 2015) Traffic Safety Study - Steeles Ave West and Torresdale Avenue / Thurman Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-86860.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Steeles Avenue W and Torresdale Avenue - Traffic Safety Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-86861.pdf
Attachment 2 - Map - Steeles Avenue W and Torresdale Avenue - Proposed Pavement Marking and Centre Median Improvements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-86862.pdf

NY11.20 - Westbound Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition - Leslie Street and Southwell Drive/Denlow Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 104 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve a westbound right-turn-on-red prohibition at the intersection of Leslie Street and Southwell Drive/Denlow Boulevard.

Origin

(November 13, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a bus service on Leslie Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to prohibit the westbound right-turn-on-red movement at the intersection of Leslie Street and Southwell Drive for safety.  A pedestrian railing on the east side of Leslie Street severely restricts the ability of westbound motorists on Southwell Drive to see opposing northbound traffic on Leslie Street when initiating their right turn.

 

The proposed prohibition will improve the safety of motorists at this intersection. It will result in a minimal increase in delay for this movement. The volume of westbound right turns is less than 30 vehicles per hour during peak periods and can be accommodated during the westbound green signal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 13, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Westbound Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition - Leslie Street and Southwell Drive/Denlow Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-87047.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Right Turn on Red Prohibition - Leslie Street & Southwell Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-87048.pdf

NY11.22 - Parking Prohibition - Gateway Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 105 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit parking at all times on the east side of Gateway Boulevard, between a point 186 metres south of Grenoble Drive (north intersection) to a point 48 metres further south.

Origin

(November 23, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a bus service on Gateway Boulevard, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting authority to prohibit parking in front of 150 Gateway Boulevard (Saint John XXII Parish). This will address problems with parked school buses obstructing sightlines and traffic flow at the circular driveway to the parish.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 23, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on a Parking Prohibition on Gateway Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-86733.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map of the Parking Prohibition on Gateway Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-86734.pdf

NY11.33 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment - Removal of the Holding (H) Symbol - 2075 Bayview Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 91 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 substantially in  accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Notice of the Intention to amend Zoning By-law No. 1367-2011 to remove a holding symbol (H) was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council on January 19, 2016.

Origin

(December 14, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposesto amend the zoning by-law to partially remove the hold on the HOS(1) zone to allow for the construction of a one-storey, 18.58 square metre addition to the M-wing ground floor entrance of Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application as the proposed addition is appropriate and satisfies the criteria to permit a partial lifting of the hold on the subject property.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 14, 2015) Final Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment for removal of the Holding (H) Symbol at 2075 Bayview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-86879.pdf

NY11.34 - Refusal Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control - 16 Kirtling Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council refuse the application to amend the Official Plan to permit a townhouse development on the site.

 

2. City Council refuse the application to amend the zoning by-laws to permit a townhouse development on the site.

 

3. Should the applications be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of Council's refusal of the Official Plan amendment, Zoning By-law amendments and the associated Site Plan application.

Origin

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-laws to permit 6 townhouse units fronting onto York Mills Road and a detached dwelling fronting onto Kirtling Place. The existing detached dwelling would be demolished. Vehicular access would be taken from Kirtling Place.

 

The proposed townhouse built form is not in keeping with the policies of the Official Plan and is inappropriate for the site. As such, staff are recommending that the applications be refused.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 15, 2015) Refusal Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control for 16 Kirtling Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-86936.pdf

Speakers

Moiz Behar, M. Behar Planning & Design Inc.

Communications (Community Council)

(January 7, 2016) Fax from Olga Elia and Virgilio Elia (NY.New.NY11.34.1)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from William Yow (NY.New.NY11.34.2)

NY11.35 - Request for Direction Report - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 53-63 Sheppard Avenue West and 62-68 Bogert Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, City Planning staff and other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the appeal of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications (Application Number 15 170269 NNY 23 OZ).

Origin

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications have been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing Council's failure to make a decision within the time period prescribed under the Planning Act. A hearing date has yet to be established.

 

The applications are to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 192 unit mixed use development that includes a 14 storey residential building with ground floor commercial uses, connected to 4 storey townhouses, at 53 to 63 Sheppard Avenue West and 62 to 68 Bogert Avenue.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff as necessary to attend the OMB hearing to oppose the applications.

 

The development proposed by the applications would:

 

-be a significant change to an established Neighbourhood and area not designated for growth;

-have an inappropriate built form and transition to the Neighbourhood; and

-be a negative precedent for the rest of the Sheppard Avenue West corridor.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 16, 2015) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1 to 8 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 53-63 Sheppard Avenue West and 62-68 Bogert Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-86996.pdf

Speakers

Tony Volpentesta, Bousfields Inc.
Barnet Kussner, WeirFoulds LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(January 15, 2016) E-mail from Tony Volpentesta, Bousfield Inc. (NY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/comm/communicationfile-58482.pdf
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Paul Martin, Vice President, West Lansing Homeowners Association (NY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/comm/communicationfile-58483.pdf

NY11.37 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application A622/14NY - 29 Donwoods Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decision related to 29 Donwoods Drive (A622/14NY) and to retain outside planners and consultants, if necessary.

Origin

(December 21, 2015) Memo from Councillor Robinson

Summary

An application for minor variances related to 29 Donwoods Drive was refused by the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment on December 10, 2015. The application entails the demolition of the existing home and the construction of a new detached dwelling and cabana.

 

The applicant appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

Residents have significant concerns about the impact of the requested variances on the neighbourhood. The proposed footprint of the home would significantly impact the privacy of the immediate neighbors, and the feel and character of the community. The residents are also concerned with the proposed removal of several mature trees on the protected ravine lot.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 21, 2015) Memo from Councillor Robinson regarding a Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application A622/14NY at 29 Donwoods Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-87683.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision on Minor Variance Application for 29 Donwoods Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-87684.pdf
Attachment 2 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Application for 29 Donwood Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-87685.pdf

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 11

SC11.3 - 51 Silversted Drive - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
41 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 51 Silversted Drive.

Origin

(December 4, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report recommends that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 51 Silversted Drive. The application indicates that the reason for removal is to address concerns that the tree may fail and damage a buried gas line. The owner has also raised concerns that tree's roots are damaging a neighbour's driveway.

 
The subject tree is a Colorado blue spruce (Picea pungens var. glauca), measuring 37 cm in diameter.  Urban Forestry does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy, maintainable and growing in an appropriate location.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 4, 2015) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 51 Silversted Drive - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-86481.pdf

Speakers

Gerald Dagenais, Owner

SC11.5 - Assumption of Services - Registered Plan 66M-2470 - Midland Avenue and St. Clair Avenue East - Monarch Corporation - Phase 2

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council assume the services installed at Midland Avenue and St. Clair Avenue East and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plan of Subdivision.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this Plan of Subdivision.

 

3.  City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Subdivision at Midland Avenue and St. Clair Avenue East.

 

4.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.  City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

 

6.  City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plan of Subdivision at Midland Avenue and St. Clair Avenue East.

Origin

(December 10, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Summary

This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the development at Midland Avenue and St. Clair Avenue East.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 10, 2015) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor - Assumption of Services -Registered Plan 66M-2470 - Midland Avenue and St. Clair Avenue East - Monarch Corporation - Phase 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-86711.pdf

SC11.6 - Assumption of Services, Registered Plan 66M-2462 - 952-976 Brimorton Drive - Tiffany Park (Botany Hill) Limited

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
43 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council assume the services installed at 952-976 Brimorton Drive and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plan of Subdivision.

 

2.   City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this Plan of Subdivision.

 

3.   City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Subdivision at 952-976 Brimorton Drive.

 

4.   City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.   City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.


6.   City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plan of Subdivision at 952-976 Brimorton Drive to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(December 10, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Summary

This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the development at 952-976 Brimorton Drive.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 10, 2015) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor - Assumption of Services - Registered Plan 66M-2462 - 952-976 Brimorton Drive Tiffany Park (Botany Hill) Ltd.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-86712.pdf

SC11.17 - 43 Upton Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend former City of Scarborough Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982 (Golden Mile Employment District), for the lands at 43 Upton Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to report (December 15, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District. 

 

2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 43 Upton Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to report (December 15, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to delete permissions for both heavy industrial uses and sensitive uses from the Zoning By-laws for the lands at 43 Upton Road. Submission of the subject application was one of the conditions of the negotiated settlement of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) appeals on the lands immediately south of the subject property known as 743 Warden Avenue.

 

The proposal complies with the Official Plan, conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 15, 2015) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 43 Upton Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-86911.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 43 Upton Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-86912.pdf

Speakers

Gulam Amla, on behalf of Starboard Seafood (Ontario) Inc.
Ziad Zeidan, on behalf of Starboard Seafood (Ontario) Inc.
Guy D'Onofrio, Goldman (Upton) Ltd., Applicant
Alfred Yen, Owner, Starboard Seafood (Ontario) Inc.

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 13

TE13.2 - Supplementary Report - 26 Ernest Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 26 Ernest Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (January 13, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following:

 

a.  The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.  Prior to the earlier of the issuance of site plan approval or the first building permit for the site, including a permit for excavation or shoring, the owner shall provide an indexed cash contribution to the City in the amount of $100,000 to be allocated towards capital improvements at the City-owned community centre located at 362 Wallace Avenue, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

ii.  The financial contribution referred to in Section 3.a.i. shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made.

 

iii.  In the event the cash contribution referred to in Section 3.a.i. has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purposes are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.

 

b.  The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:


i.  Prior to the earlier of site plan approval or the first building permit for the lands, including a permit for shoring or excavation, the Owner is required to obtain and register on title all necessary easements and agreements over the lands municipally known as 351 Wallace Avenue to permit access to and use of the loading space, driveway, and driveway ramp to the underground parking in favour of the Owner, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the City Solicitor.

 

ii.  Prior to site plan approval, the owner is required to convey to the City at nominal cost, free and clear of encumbrances, a lane widening of 1.98 metres along the east property line to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Transportation Services in consultation with the City Solicitor.

 

iii.  Prior to the earlier of the first above-grade building permit or any condominium approval for the development, the owner shall:

 

1.  construct and thereafter maintain an accessible extension of the private Elsie Lane on the lot from the north property line to Ernest Avenue which shall appear and function as if it is a City-owned and operated public road;

 

2.  at the owner’s sole cost and expense, this extension shall be constructed to City public road standards, with a minimum width of 16.0 metres, and on similar terms and conditions as the construction of the portion of Elsie Lane at 351 Wallace Avenue, with the specific location, configuration and design to be determined in the context of site plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended, and secured in a Site Plan Agreement with the City, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the City Solicitor.

 

3.  the owner covenants and agrees to dedicate the road to the City at nominal cost in the future in the event the City, at its sole discretion, elects to acquire the private Elsie Lane as a public road, on similar terms and conditions as those secured for Elsie Lane within the development municipally known as 351 Wallace Avenue; and

 

4.  at the owner’s sole expense, prepare and convey a public access easement to the City over the private Elsie Lane on similar terms and conditions secured in the private Elsie Lane public access easement at 351 Wallace Avenue, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the City Solicitor.

 

c.  Prior to the issuance of site plan approval, and secured through a Site Plan Agreement, the Owner shall provide a letter of credit in a form and amount satisfactory to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to secure the completion of the private lane required in part 3.b.ii. above.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

City Planning staff submitted a Final Report, recommending refusal of the application at 26 Ernest Avenue to Toronto and East York Community Council at its meeting of June 16, 2015, as Item TE7.15.  Community Council referred the report to staff with the request that City Planning continue discussions with the owner on potential changes to the proposal and report back.

 

The applicant, in consultation with City staff, has revised its application.  The revised proposal includes 79, 3-storey townhouse units on three blocks on the north side of Ernest Avenue adjacent to the Metrolinx rail corridor.  The proposed height of the townhouses is 12 metres with a total gross floor area of 11,835 square metres and a density of 1.64 times the area of the lot.  A total of 100 residential parking spaces are proposed, 92 of which would be located in one level of underground parking and 8 visitor spaces would be located at grade along the privately owned Elsie Lane extension.
  

The revisions made to the application have resulted in a proposal that conforms with the Official Plan and is consistent with Council-approved guidelines.  This supplementary report reviews and recommends approval of the application, as revised, to amend the Zoning By-law.

 

The Draft Zoning By-law Amendment and the community benefits to be secured under Section 37 of the Planning Act will be included in a Supplementary Report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 26 Ernest Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87082.pdf

2a - Supplementary Report - 26 Ernest Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application

Origin
(January 13, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This supplementary report provides the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment and discusses the community benefits to be secured under Section 37 of the Planning Act for the proposed development at 26 Ernest Avenue.  The subject application is addressed in the Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District dated December 16, 2015.

Background Information (Community Council)
(January 13, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 26 Ernest Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87730.pdf

TE13.3 - Final Report - 40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Communication TE13.3.3 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 40-58 Widmer Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (December 14, 2015)  from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District), with amendments to Attachment 4 as follows:

 

a.  amending Section 1.(g) by deleting "223" before the words "parking spaces" and replacing it with "88", so that the section now reads:

 

"1.(g)  a minimum of 88 parking spaces for the use of residents shall be provided and maintained on the lot;"; and

 

b.  amending Section 1.(h) by deleting “26” before the words "parking spaces" and replacing it with “12”, so that the section now reads:

 

"1.(h)  a minimum of 12 parking spaces for the use of visitors shall be provided and maintained on the lot;".

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to withdraw their appeal of Official Plan Amendment 199.

 

4.   Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into appropriate Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the City Solicitor to secure the following, at the owner's expense:

 

a.  Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall make a financial contribution to the City in the amount of $1,500,000, to be allocated as follows:

 

i.  $1,200,000 for community services, facilities and/or parkland improvements in Ward 20 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

ii.  $150,000 for the maintenance of or the provision of new affordable housing in Ward 20 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the Director, Affordable Housing Office; and

 

iii.  $150,000 for capital repairs to Toronto Community Housing buildings in Ward 20 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the Director, Affordable Housing Office.

 

b.  Prior to the issuance of the first below-grade building permit, the owner shall make a financial contribution to the City in the amount of $300,000 to be a allocated for pedestrian and cycling improvements in Ward 20 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

c.  The cash contributions identified in Recommendation 4. a. and b. shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

d.  Prior to issuance of any building permit, including permits for excavation and shoring, for the first building or structure on the lands, the owner shall submit a Construction Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and thereafter shall implement the plan during the course of construction, with further details regarding the contents of the construction management plan, including the requirements of the owner to participate in consultation with the community on the construction management plan, to be included in the Section 37 Agreement.

 

5.  City Council determine that pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, as amended, no further notice is required in respect of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for 40-58 Widmer Street.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 14, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to redevelop the site at 40-58 Widmer Street with a 41-storey (137.5 metres including mechanical, 130 metres excluding mechanical) residential building with 426 residential units.  The proposed building also includes six levels of below grade parking with 74 residential parking spaces and 26 visitor parking spaces.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 14, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 40-58 Widmer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87064.pdf

Speakers

Scott Wood, Property Manager, Camwood Properties Ltd.

Communications (Community Council)

(January 11, 2016) Letter from Paul Millar, President, 1690682 Ontario Inc. (TE.Supp.TE13.3.1)
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Ralph J. Daley, President, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp.TE13.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58154.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(February 4, 2015) Letter from Kevin Leon, Peter Street Toronto GP Inc., Crestpoint Real Estate Investments Ltd. (CC.New.TE13.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58759.pdf

TE13.4 - Final Report - 350 Vaughan Road - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 1-83 for the former City of York, for the lands at 350 Vaughan Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached as Attachment 11 to the report (December 16, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 


2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 350 Vaughan Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached as Attachment 12 to the report (December 16, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.  

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to submit a revised Functional Servicing & Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

5.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to address all matters related to fire services, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

6.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a.  The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit the owner shall make an indexed cash contribution to the City in the amount of $30,000 to be allocated at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the local Councillor, toward any one or more of the following:

 

aWychwood Barns;
b.  Toronto Bike Share; and
c.  Improvements to local community facilities.

 

Such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made.

 

b.  In the event the cash contribution referred to in Section 6.a. has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.

 

c.  The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.  The owner shall pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing assessment, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure is required to support this development.

 

ii.  Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site, the owner shall enter into an agreement to construct a new sanitary sewer on Cherrywood Avenue, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

iii.  Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site, the owner shall prepare at its expense all documents and convey to the City, at a nominal cost, a 0.67 metre wide strip of land to the full extent of the site abutting the north limit of the east-west public lane that runs easterly from Rushton Road, and a 0.67 metre wide strip of land to the full extent of the site abutting the north limit of the east-west public lane that runs westerly from Cherrywood Avenue, such lands to be free and clear of all encumbrances, save and except for utility poles, and subject to an access easement, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the City Solicitor.

 

iv.  Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the site, the owner shall prepare all documents at its expense and convey to the City, at a nominal cost, a 1.5 metre by 1.5 metre daylight triangle space, at the south-easterly portion of the section that connects the public lanes that extend from Rushton Road and Cherrywood Avenue, such lands to be free and clear of all encumbrances, save and except for utility poles, and subject to an access easement, all to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the City Solicitor.

 

v.  The Owner shall submit to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, for review and acceptance, prior to depositing in the appropriate Land Registry Office, a draft Reference Plan of Survey, in metric units and integrated with the Ontario Co-ordinate System, showing the co-ordinate values at the main corners of the development lands, and delineating thereon, by separate PARTS, the lands to be conveyed to the City and any appurtenant rights-of-way.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to permit seven 3-storey detached houses and two 3-storey semi-detached units at 350 Vaughan Road.  Parking is to be provided at the rear of the units with access off of a public laneway.

 

The proposed development conforms with the development criteria for Neighbourhoods, Healthy Neighbourhoods, Built Form, and all other relevant Official Plan policies.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 350 Vaughan Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87041.pdf
Attachment 11 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Zoning By-law No. 1-83 as amended - 350 Vaughan Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87890.pdf
Attachment 12 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 ,as amended - 350 Vaughan Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87891.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(December 21, 2015) E-mail from Judy Dobbs (TE.Supp.TE13.4.1)

TE13.5 - Final Report - 45-77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 45-77 Dunfield Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached as Attachment 12 to the revised report (December 11, 2015), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York Community District.

 

2.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 45-77 Dunfield Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment 13 to the revised report (December 11, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner at 45-77 Dunfield Avenue to provide sufficient on-site parking as outlined in the Engineering and Construction Services memo of October 21, 2015 and in the report dated December 11, 2015, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

5.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner at 45-77 Dunfield Avenue to submit a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

6.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner at 45-77 Dunfield Avenue to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a.  The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.  the construction, finishing, furnishing and equipping of a non-profit licensed child care facility to accommodate at least 52 children, including infants, toddlers and preschoolers, generally in accordance with the Child Care Term Sheet (Refer to Term Sheet in Attachment 11), comprising 531 square metres of interior space and 254 square metres of exterior space adjacent to the interior space, including outdoor storage, and the provision of a minimum of three (3) child care-pick-up and drop-off parking spaces;

 

ii.  the entering into a lease agreement with the City for three 25-year terms and one 24-year term for a total of 99 years; and such facility shall be free of all rent, the cost of all utilities and municipal services supplied to the facility, caretaking costs, repair and maintenance costs, property damage, liability insurance, realty taxes and local improvement charges;

 

iii.  a one-time cash contribution in range of $150,000 to $180,000 to the Child Care Facility replacement reserve fund to replace appliances and large equipment due to wear and tear; and

 

iv.  a one-time cash contribution in the range of  $100,000 to $150,000 to Start-Up Costs for the defrayment of operational deficits during the first year of operation.

 

b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.  an easement for the provision of 6,060 square metres of privately owned, publicly accessible open space all located on the site.  (Refer to the Plan in Attachment 10, attached to the report [December 11, 2015] from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District);

 

ii.  the Owner shall provide and maintain 177 existing dwelling units at 77 Dunfield Avenue and 575 existing dwelling units at 45 Dunfield Avenue on the site as rental housing for the period of at least 20 years, from the date of the Zoning By-Law being in-force and effect, with all the new and retained associated facilities and amenities of the buildings to be secured for the rental housing units, at no extra cost to the existing tenants, and with no applications for demolition or conversion from residential rental use, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor;

 

iii. the Owner shall provide and maintain 519 new rental units on the site as rental housing for the period of at least 10 years, with no application for demolition or conversion for a period of at least 10 years from the date of first occupancy;

 

iv.  the Owner shall provide a Construction Mitigation Plan that includes provisions for special needs tenants, mitigation for tenants during construction periods, including compensation for the removal of facilities currently associated with the units, a respite room and other measures as may be deemed reasonable and appropriate to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, without cost-pass through to tenants; and

 

v.  the Owner shall provide a Tenant Communication Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes two new rental apartment buildings of 26 and 24 storeys (73.6 and 70.3 metres respectively excluding mechanical equipment) at 45-77 Dunfield Avenue.

 

The proposed 26-storey building would front west onto Dunfield Avenue while the 24-storey building would front east onto Lillian Street.  The two buildings would have a total of 519 new residential units, and have a combined residential gross floor area of 37,846 square metres.  A child care facility with a gross floor area of 531 square metres is proposed in the 24-storey apartment building. A combined 7,060 square metre open space, comprised of a new privately owned, publicly accessible open space (POPS) and Dunfield Park, an existing leased City park, is proposed at the south end of the site along Soudan Avenue.

 

Two existing attached apartment buildings located in the north portion of the site are to be retained:  a 17-storey, 177-unit seniors residence at 77 Dunfield; and, a 28-storey, 575-unit rental building at 45 Dunfield Avenue.

 

The existing and proposed development would have a total density of 5.3 times the area of the lot.  A total of 520 vehicle parking spaces are proposed on three levels below grade to serve the two new buildings and the two existing buildings on the site.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 11, 2015) Revised Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 45-77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87732.pdf
Attachment 12 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 438-86 - 45-77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87858.pdf
Attachment 13 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 569-2013 - 45-77 Dunfield Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87859.pdf

Speakers

Karni Baum, 45 Dunfield Tenant Association
Christopher Miller
Adam Brown, Sherman Brown

TE13.6 - Final Report - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE13.6b with recommendations)

Communication TE13.6.72 has been submitted on this Item.

Bills 110, 111 and 132 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending land acquisition by the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 875 and 887 Queen Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (December 17, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 875 and 887 Queen Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report  (January 12, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.


3.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 875 and 887 Queen Street East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 2 to the report (January 12, 2016) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

5.  Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the Lands (the "Owner") to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following community benefits on such terms and conditions as deemed satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor:

 

a.  The Owner will convey to the City fee simple title to no less than 1,827.31 square metres of indoor space suitable for use as a shelter, no less than 104.05 square metres of outdoor amenity space associated with the shelter, with such conveyance to include the construction and finishing of those spaces to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the City Solicitor.

 

6.  City Council require that the following matters are also to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:

 

a.  The Owner will submit a hydrogeological report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, prior to the issuance of any building permit.  For greater clarity, a building permit shall also include conditional building permit.  The hydrogeological report will provide detailed groundwater conditions, indicate whether or not groundwater will have to be pumped and discharged to a City sewer on a temporary or permanent basis, and include a design of a permanent dewatering system for the site if groundwater is required to be pumped and discharged to a City sewer.

 

b.  The Owner will reconstruct the north and east building façades of 887 Queen Street East (former Woodgreen Pharmacy) as a design element of the proposed development, using original materials to maintain the scale and appearance of the existing building, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

7.  City Council request the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to secure the reconstruction of the façade of 887 Queen Street East through Site Plan Approval as part of the development's architectural details and materials.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report directly to City Council on February 3 and 4, 2016, on the required financial contribution from the City’s Land Acquisition Fund to support the project as detailed in the report, headed "Final Report - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications", from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 17, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

875 Queen Lofts Inc. proposes to demolish the existing buildings at 875 and 887 Queen Street East (Woodgreen Church - St. Matthew's Cathedral and the Woodgreen Discount Drugs building, respectively), and to develop the site with a 7-storey mixed-used building with a total of 122 residential condominium units and 1,568.39 square metres of commercial area along Queen Street East.  The development will be 23.2 metres high, including the mechanical penthouse.  The Red Door Shelter (crisis care shelter use) exists on the site; it will be retained and incorporated into the development in a 3-storey component at the southwest corner of the site.  Further, the façade of the Woodgreen Discount Drugs building at 887 Queen Street East will be reconstructed using the original building material and included as a component of the development in its original location at the northeast corner of the site.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.  The proposed building represents a moderate and incremental intensification along Queen Street East, and retains an important community service facility in the context of an additional residential storey of development.  The proposed building fits within the character of Leslieville and ensures the existing massing scale at the intersection of Queen Street East and Logan Avenue is retained by providing appropriate stepbacks above the reconstructed façade of the building at 887 Queen Street East as a component of the development.  The development will contribute to the fine-grain retail rhythm of the area by providing several smaller retail units along Queen Street East.  The proposal is consistent with the relevant policies of the Official Plan, the recently approved area specific policies and the Leslieville Urban Design Guidelines.

 

A Supplementary Report will be provided prior to January 19, 2016 with the draft Zoning By-law and any outstanding details.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 17, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87095.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-Law No. 438-86 - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88522.pdf
Attachment 2 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-Lay No. 569-2013 - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88523.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(January 29, 2016) Supplementary report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Acquisition of Shelter Space at 875 Queen Street East - Securing a Future for the Red Door Shelter (TE13.6b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-89861.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

Speakers

Ann Elliott, Red Door Family Shelter
Matthew Hill, Leslieville Historical Society

Communications (Community Council)

(January 6, 2016) E-mail from Ted Radlak, on behalf of the Leslieville Historical Society (TE.Supp.TE13.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58131.pdf
(January 13, 2016) Letter from the Board of Directors of The Red Door Family Shelter (TE.Supp.TE13.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58089.pdf
(January 15, 2016) Letter from Matthew Hill (TE.Supp.TE13.6.3)
(January 15, 2016) Letter from Shiralee Hudson Hill, Leslieville Historical Society (TE.Supp.TE13.6.4)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Dann Cushing, Red Door Family Shelter Capital Campaign Committee (TE.Supp.TE13.6.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58157.pdf
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Marc Odette, Red Door Family Shelter Capital Campaign Committee (TE.Supp.TE13.6.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58158.pdf
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Sophie Lazarou (TE.Supp.TE13.6.7)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Cathy Mann (TE.Supp.TE13.6.8)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Sarah King (TE.Supp.TE13.6.9)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Christine Robbins (TE.Supp.TE13.6.10)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Kiva Reardon (TE.Supp.TE13.6.11)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Mary McMillan (TE.Supp.TE13.6.12)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Anne O'Connell, Associate Professor, School of Social Work, York University (TE.Supp.TE13.6.13)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Dr. Frances Latchford (TE.Supp.TE13.6.14)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Susan Dimitrakopoulos (TE.Supp.TE13.6.15)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Fiona Devine (TE.Supp.TE13.6.16)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Mary Frances Ellison (TE.Supp.TE13.6.17)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Kate Davis (TE.Supp.TE13.6.18)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Pat Meadus (TE.Supp.TE13.6.19)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Sandi Danelon (TE.Supp.TE13.6.20)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Valerie Sylvester (TE.Supp.TE13.6.21)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Jamie Gillingham (TE.Supp.TE13.6.22)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Emma Nichols, Principal, Queen Alexandra Middle School (TE.Supp.TE13.6.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58172.pdf
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Louisa Jewell (TE.Supp.TE13.6.24)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Anna Willats (TE.Supp.TE13.6.25)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Nneka MacGregor, Executive Director, WomenatthecentrE (TE.Supp.TE13.6.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58177.pdf
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Elizabeth Simmie, Red Door Shelter Capital Campaign Committee (TE.Supp.TE13.6.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58178.pdf
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Sonja Greckol (TE.Supp.TE13.6.28)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Raymond J. Gates (TE.Supp.TE13.6.29)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Valerie A. Jacobs (TE.Supp.TE13.6.30)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Lisa Kahn (TE.Supp.TE13.6.31)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Chi Chi Godin (TE.Supp.Te13.6.32)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Mary Jankulak (TE.Supp.Te13.6.33)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Tracy Amponsah Ampofoh (TE.Supp.TE13.6.34)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Sharon Williams (TE.Supp.TE13.6.35)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Dr. Suzanne Turner and Dr. Jeremy Petch (TE.Supp.TE13.6.36)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Judy Trites (TE.Supp.TE13.6.37)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Judy Goddard (TE.Supp.TE13.6.38)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Chris McDowall (TE.Supp.TE13.6.39)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Paul Keogan (TE.Supp.TE13.6.40)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Peter Wilkins (TE.Supp.TE13.6.41)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Ranu Hamilton (TE.Supp.TE13.6.42)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Pauline Stanley (TE.Supp.TE13.6.43)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Cathy F. Burrows (TE.Supp.TE13.6.44)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Roberto Freire (TE.Supp.TE13.6.45)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Gaelan Anthony D'costa (TE.Supp.TE13.6.46)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Tine Houtman (TE.Supp.TE13.6.47)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Chris Gale, CEO, Angus Systems Group (TE.Supp.TE13.6.48)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Stephanie Sarmiento (TE.Supp.TE13.6.49)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Joel D. Farber, Fogler, Rubinoff LLP, on behalf of Trinity Urban Properties Inc. (TE.Supp.TE13.6.50)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58372.pdf
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Esther Keys (TE.Supp.TE13.6.51)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from John Perigoe (TE.Supp.TE13.6.52)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Claudine van den Heuvel (TE.Supp.TE13.6.53)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Desmond Daly (TE.Supp.TE13.6.54)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Jayne Danska (TE.Supp.TE13.6.55)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Sabrina Barusta (TE.Supp.TE13.6.56)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Henry Heillig (TE.Supp.TE13.6.57)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Mel and Shirley Morris (TE.Supp.TE13.6.58)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Maria Lucia Amaral (TE.Supp.TE13.6.59)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Alexandra Zimbulidis (TE.Supp.TE13.6.60)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Monique Tschofen and Matthew Kronby (TE.Supp.TE13.6.61)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Kelly Okamura (TE.Supp.TE13.6.62)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Gord and Lee Martin (TE.Supp.TE13.6.63)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Jackie DaSilva (TE.Supp.TE13.6.64)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Elizabeth Block (TE.Supp.TE13.6.65)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Wairimu Wamugo (TE.Supp.TE13.6.66)
(January 18, 2016) E-mail from Tammy A. White (TE.Supp.TE13.6.67)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Judith Haynes (TE.Supp.TE13.6.68)
(January 19, 2016) E-mail from Noel Palmer (TE.Supp.TE13.6.69)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Janis Daly (TE.Supp.TE13.6.70)
(January 18, 2016) Letter from Carol Watson, Chairperson, Riverdale Co-operative Houses (TE.Supp.TE13.6.71)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58523.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(January 18, 2016) Letter from Jana R. Steele (CC.Supp.TE13.6.72)

6a - Supplementary Report - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications

Origin
(January 12, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This supplementary report provides the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments, discusses the community benefits to be secured under Section 37 of the Planning Act and reviews the remaining issues for the proposed development at 875 and 887 Queen Street East.  The subject application is also addressed in the Final Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District dated December 17, 2015.

Background Information (Community Council)
(January 12, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87851.pdf
Attachment 1 - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88429.pdf
Attachment 2 - 875 and 887 Queen Street East - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88430.pdf

TE13.7 - Final Report - 71-73 Saulter Street - Common Elements Condominium Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 71-73 Saulter Street, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (December 4, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:

 

a.  the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (December 4, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and

 

b.  any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 4, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to create a common elements condominium consisting of a private driveway to provide access to five freehold townhouse units for the lands municipally known as 71-73 Saulter Street.  It would also ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the driveway by the condominium corporation.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 4, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 71-73 Saulter Street - Common Elements Condominium Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86777.pdf

TE13.8 - Final Report - Queen Street East/Ashbridge Precinct Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Urban Design Guidelines

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Communication TE13.8.2 has been submitted on this Item.

Bill 89 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands fronting on Queen Street East between Leslie Street and Coxwell Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (December 15, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council adopt the Urban Design Guidelines attached as Attachment 5 to the report (December 15, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.  City Council request the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, City Planning Division to research and evaluate properties on Queen Street East in the Ashbridge Precinct, located between Leslie Street to Coxwell Avenue, for inclusion on the City's Heritage Register.

 

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

In June 2014, City Council directed City Planning staff to determine if either the existing Urban Design Guidelines for Queen Street East (between Coxwell Avenue and Neville Park Boulevard) or the Leslieville Urban Design Guidelines (between Jimmie Simpson Park and Leslie Street) should be extended to apply to the portion of Queen Street between Leslie Street and Coxwell Avenue.  This area sits between the aforementioned study areas to the east and west.

 

This report summarizes the outcome of the Queen Street East/Ashbridge Precinct Planning Study; provides a draft City-initiated Official Plan Amendment for the study area; and recommends approval of the area-specific Queen Street East/Ashbridge Precinct Urban Design Guidelines to guide development within the study area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Queen Street East/Ashbridge Precinct Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment and Urban Design Guidelines - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87083.pdf
Attachment - Part 1 - Queen Street East: Ashbridge Precinct Urban Design Guidelines - Leslie Street to Coxwell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87228.pdf
Attachment - Part 2 - Queen Street East: Ashbridge Precinct Urban Design Guidelines - Leslie Street to Coxwell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87229.pdf
Attachment - Part 3 - Queen Street East: Ashbridge Precinct Urban Design Guidelines - Leslie Street to Coxwell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87230.pdf
Attachment - Part 4 - Queen Street East: Ashbridge Precinct Urban Design Guidelines - Leslie Street to Coxwell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87234.pdf
Attachment - Part 5 - Queen Street East: Ashbridge Precinct Urban Design Guidelines - Leslie Street to Coxwell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87235.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(January 17, 2016) Letter from Victoria Dinnick, Chair, Leslieville Community Coalition (TE.Supp.TE13.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58152.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(February 1, 2016) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (CC.Supp.TE13.8.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58763.pdf
(February 2, 2016) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (CC.New.TE13.8.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58760.pdf

TE13.9 - Final Report - 73, 77, 79 and 83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Communication TE13.9.1 has been submitted on this Item

Bills 107 and 108 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 73, 77, 79 and 83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (December 15, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 73, 77, 79 and 83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (December 15, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to permit 11 three-storey townhouses with private garages on a future common element private driveway at 73, 77, 79 and 83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue.

 

The proposal represents a residential infill of a property that currently has 5 houses with 11 new townhouses.  The development is similar to other developments in the neighbourhood, including the development immediately to the south.  The proposed development is an appropriate infill development on the subject site.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the zoning by-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 15, 2015) Revised report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 73, 77, 79 and 83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87084.pdf
Attachment 6 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 438-86 - 73, 77, 79 and 83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87738.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 569-2013 - 73, 77, 79 and 83 Woodbine Avenue and 3 Buller Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87739.pdf

Speakers

Sue Graham-Nutter
Michael Goldberg, Principal, Goldberg Group

Communications (City Council)

(February 2, 2016) E-mail from Rike Burkhardt (CC.New.TE13.9.1)

TE13.10 - Request for Direction Report - 65 Grand Magazine Street (Fort York Block 4A) Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-Law Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues outlined in the report (December 11, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, regarding 65 Grand Magazine Street, and report back to City Council on the details of a settlement, if one is reached, including Section 37 matters.

 

2.  In the event that the outstanding issues contained in the report (December 11, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District are not resolved, City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other City staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications as proposed.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to identify and provide direction to City Staff and the City Solicitor with respect to matters, services and facilities pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act in the event the Board approves the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment applications as proposed in whole or in part.

 

4.  In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its final Order to approve the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment for the subject lands until such time as:

 

a.  the City and the owner have presented to the Ontario Municipal Board an Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment that implements the decision of the Board in form and substance satisfactory to the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the City Solicitor; and

 

b.  community benefits and other matters in support of the development as are determined appropriate are secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the City Solicitor.

Origin

(December 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On December 15, 2014, ONNI Group submitted applications to amend the City’s Official Plan and Zoning By-law 438-86.  The applications propose a 32-Storey (106.5 metre) residential building containing 511 dwelling units at 65 Grand Magazine Street.  A total of 420 vehicle parking spaces are proposed in 4 levels of underground parking with 513 bike parking spaces proposed on the ground and P1 levels.

 

On July 27, 2015, the applications were appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to City Council’s failure to make a decision on the requested Official Plan amendment and Zoning By-law amendment within 180 and 120 days, respectively.

 

The applicant and City staff have met on a number of occasions to discuss the City’s concerns with the application. The applicant and City staff will continue to meet to discuss these matters in an effort to reach a resolution. Staff are requesting City Council direction to continue these discussions and, if unsuccessful, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the proposed development.

 

A prehearing at the Ontario Municipal Board is being scheduled for February 2016.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 65 Grand Magazine Street (Fort York Block 4A) Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-Law Amendment - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87044.pdf

Speakers

Patrick Devine, Devine Park LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(January 13, 2016) Letter from Don Cranston, Chair, The Friends of Fort York and Garrison Common (TE.Supp.TE13.10.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58133.pdf

TE13.11 - Request for Direction Report - 23 Spadina Avenue - Zoning By-Law Amendment Application and Site Plan Control Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues outlined in this report (January 18, 2016) from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, regarding 23 Spadina Avenue,  and report back to City Council on the details of a settlement, if one is reached, including Section 37 matters.

 

2.  In the event that the outstanding issues contained in this report are not adequately resolved, City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other City staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan applications as proposed.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to identify the matters, services and facilities pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to be secured, in the event the Ontario Municipal Board approves the Zoning By-law amendment application as proposed in whole or in part.

 

4.  In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its final Order to approve the Zoning By-law amendment and Site Plan applications for the subject lands until such time as:

 

a.  the City and the owner have presented to the Ontario Municipal Board a Zoning By-law amendment that implements the decision of the Ontario Municipal Board in form and substance satisfactory to the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the City Solicitor;

 

b.  community benefits and other matters in support of the development as are determined appropriate are secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the City Solicitor; and

 

c.  Notice of Approval Conditions has been finalized by the City.

Origin

(January 18, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The applications propose a mixed-use development including retail, office and residential uses in two towers.  Tower A is proposed to be 79 storeys high (247.23 metres including mechanicals).  Tower B is proposed to be 68 storeys high (215.43 metres including mechanicals).  The total gross floor area of the proposed development is approximately 126,277 square metres, representing a density of 21.83 times the lot area.  A total of 1,536 dwelling units and 724 parking spaces are also proposed.

 

The applicant has appealed the applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed period under the Planning Act.  A prehearing is scheduled for February 18, 2016.  A full hearing has not yet been scheduled by the OMB.

 

The applicant and City staff have met to discuss the City's concerns with the application and outlined in this report, and staff continue to have constructive discussions with the applicant.  The applicant has advised that a revised application will be submitted in the near future which is anticipated to address a number of the City issues.  City staff will continue to meet with the applicant to discuss the City's concerns including any concerns identified on a revised proposal in an effort to reach resolution.

 

This report seeks Council's direction to oppose the proposed development at the Ontario Municipal Board in its current form.  The proposal in its current form represents overdevelopment of the site and does not adequately address the Official Plan, Railway Lands Secondary Plans, Central and West Urban Design Guidelines and the City's Tall Building Design Guidelines.  The height and density are not consistent with the existing and planned context and the massing of the proposed building would have unacceptable impacts on the public realm.  This report also recommends continuing discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 18, 2016) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 23 Spadina Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Site Plan Control Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87852.pdf
(December 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 23 Spadina Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Direction Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87065.pdf

TE13.12 - 45 Oaklands Avenue and Part of 131 Farnham Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
Communications TE13.12.4 to TE13.12.8 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation.

Origin

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request direction from City Council on the pending Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing on the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan applications for 45 Oaklands Avenue and part of 131 Farnham Avenue.  The application, as revised, proposes 22, 4-storey townhouses in 5 blocks facing west on Avenue Road and south on Oaklands Avenue.

 

Staff recommend that the City support the revised proposal as described in this report at the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), if the outstanding issues are resolved.

 

Outstanding issues include a request that the applicant provide further information and continue discussion with relevant City staff in order to address outstanding issues.  Should the outstanding issues not be resolved, Staff recommend City Council direct the appropriate staff to attend any OMB hearing in opposition to the proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 15, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 45 Oaklands Avenue and Part of 131 Farnham Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87066.pdf

Speakers

Michael Vaughan

Communications (Community Council)

(January 9, 2016) E-mail from Mark Steele (TE.Supp.TE13.12.1)
(January 15, 2016) Letter from Michael J. McQuaid, Weirfoulds LLP, on behalf of the Christian Schools of Ontario (TE.Supp.TE13.12.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58135.pdf
(January 17, 2016) E-mail from Bill Saul (TE.Supp.TE13.12.3)

Communications (City Council)

(January 26, 2016) E-mail from Joseph LaBine (CC.Main.TE13.12.4)
(January 29, 2016) E-mail from Courtney Scharfe (CC.Supp.TE13.12.5)
(January 29, 2016) E-mail from David Devine (CC.Supp.TE13.12.6)
(January 31, 2016) E-mail from Mary Kopman (CC.Supp.TE13.12.7)
(February 2, 2016) Letter from Paul De Francesca (CC.New.TE13.12.8)

TE13.13 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (99 Atlantic Avenue)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 40 Hanna Avenue, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with such alterations substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated October 28, 2015, prepared by WZMH Architects, approved by the Ontario Municipal Board November 9, 2015, and the Heritage Conservation Plan, prepared by E.R.A. Architects Inc., issued April 16, 2015 and revised to October 27, 2015, both on file with the Senior Manager of Heritage Preservation Services subject to the following conditions:

 

a.  Prior to final Site Plan approval for the property located at 40 Hanna Avenue, the owner shall:

 

i.  Provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan dated October 27, 2015 and the plans and drawings dated October 28, 2015, prepared by WZMH Architects.

 

b.  Prior to final Site Plan approval for the property located at 40 Hanna Avenue, the related site specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council and consistent with the OMB Order issued November 9, 2015.


c.  Prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 40 Hanna Avenue, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

i.  Provide full building permit drawings including notes and specifications for the conservation, stabilization and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.  Provide a Letter of Credit, including provisions for upward indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan.

 

d.  Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall:

 

i.  Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.  Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

Origin

(November 25, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 40 Hanna Avenue (99 Atlantic Avenue). The conservation strategy was prepared in conjunction with an Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) settlement relating to an Official Plan Amendment application and a Zoning By-law Amendment application, both of which were approved by the Ontario Municipal Board in an Order issued on November 9, 2015 (Case No. PL140865).  The approved applications permit the construction of a new eight (8) storey office building on the west side of the site, alterations to the designated four-storey factory building for office and retail functions, and the adaptive re-use of the boiler house. Together, the designated boiler house and factory building comprise the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Factory Complex (the "Factory Complex").

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 25, 2015) Revised Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (99 Atlantic Avenue)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86218.pdf

13a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (99 Atlantic Avenue)

Origin
(December 17, 2015) Letter from Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board December 15, 2015, considered a report (November 25, 2015) from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (99 Atlantic Avenue).

Background Information (Community Council)
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 40 Hanna Avenue (99 Atlantic Avenue)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87108.pdf

TE13.14 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.   City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 1001 Queen Street West in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to allow for alterations to the south and east wall, excluding the proposed removal of the northernmost bay of the east wall along Shaw Street, with such alterations in accordance with the Conservation Plan prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated October 14, 2015, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, subject to minor amendments satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following conditions:

 

a.  Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval for the property at 1001 Queen Street West, the owner shall:

 

i.  provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Conservation Plan for the property at 1001 Queen Street West prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated October 14, 2015, with the Conservation Plan to include an Interpretation Plan and a restoration strategy to address the removal of cement parging from the northeast corner wall end at Queen Street West and Shaw Street and all associated costs for conservation and interpretive work, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

ii.  provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.i. in the report dated November 18, 2015 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.  Prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 1001 Queen Street West, the applicant shall:

 

i.  provide a Letter of Credit, including provisions for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to secure all conservation and interpretation work included in the approved Conservation Plan.

 

c.  Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.b.i. in the report dated November 18, 2015 from the Director, Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the owner shall:

 

i.  provide a letter of substantial completion, prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant, confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

ii.  provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

Origin

(November 18, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the conservation strategy described in this report for the heritage property at 1001 Queen Street West in conjunction with Phase 1C of a Site Plan application which includes the conservation of and alterations to the historic asylum wall.  This phase of work also includes the construction of two new buildings on the property, new publicly accessible open spaces and new roads.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 18, 2015) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86225.pdf
Attachment 1 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86226.pdf
Attachment 2 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86227.pdf
Attachment 3 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86228.pdf
Attachment 4 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86229.pdf
Attachment 5 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86230.pdf
Attachment 6 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86231.pdf

Speakers

Edward Janiszewski, Friends of the CAMH Archives
Shirley Morriss, Friends of the CAMH Archives

14a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West

Origin
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board December 15, 2015, considered a report (November 18, 2015) from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West.


Speakers
Eric Turcotte, Urban Strategies
Andrew Pruss, ERA Architects Inc. (Submission Filed)
Edward Janiszewski, Volunteer Community Board Member, Friends of the CAMH Archives
Shirley Morriss, Volunteer Community Board Member, Friends of the CAMH Archives


Communications
(December 14, 2015) Presentation from Eric Turcotte, Urban Strategies Inc. (PB.Supp.PB10.3.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pb/comm/communicationfile-57821.pdf)
(December 14, 2015) Presentation from Andrew Pruss, ERA Architects (PB.Supp.PB10.3.2)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pb/comm/communicationfile-57824.pdf)
(December 14, 2015) Letter from Volunteer Community Board Members of the Friends of the CAMH Archives - Edward Janiszewski, Sydney Jones and Shirley Morriss (PB.Supp.PB10.3.3)
(December 14, 2015) E-mail from Geoffrey Reaume (PB.Supp.PB10.3.4)
(December 15, 2015) Submission from Andrew Pruss, ERA Architects (PB.Supp.PB10.3.5)

Background Information (Community Council)
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 1001 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87130.pdf

TE13.15 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council include the property at 349 George Street (Allan School) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.

 

2.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at 349 George Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 349 George Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (November 23, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

3.  If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4.  If there are objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5.  If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

Origin

(November 23, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the property at 349 George Street on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  The site contains the former Allan School (1910), which is most recently known as the School House Shelter operated by Dixon Hall and located beside the Seaton House men's shelter.

 

The municipally owned property at 349 George Street is located on the section of the street between Dundas Street East and Gerrard Street East that is the subject of the George Street Revitalization, a City-led project to replace Seaton House with a new men's shelter, a long-term care facility, units for both assisted living and affordable housing, as well as a community service hub.

 

The inclusion of the property at 349 George Street on the City's Heritage Register and its designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act would identify all of the cultural heritage values and attributes of the property and ensure that they are preserved as part of the plans for the George Street Revitalization.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 23, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86286.pdf
Attachment 1 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86287.pdf
Attachment 2 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86288.pdf
Attachment 3 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86289.pdf
Attachment 4 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86290.pdf

15a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street

Origin
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary
The Toronto Preservation Board December 15, 2015, considered a report (November 26, 2015) from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street.
Background Information (Community Council)
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 349 George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87131.pdf

TE13.16 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 106 Glen Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 106 Glen Road in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated November 17, 2015 prepared by Gervais Design-Build and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) dated October 2015 prepared by William Greer, date-stamped received by the City Planning Division November 18, 2015 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to the following condition:

 

a.  Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the alterations of the property located at 106 Glen Road, the applicant will provide final building permit drawings and a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

Origin

(November 23, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to a designated rated heritage property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (NRHCD) under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The proposal is to alter an existing 2-storey brick, wood and glass building. The existing ravine property has been evaluated as a Category "C" structure in the NRHCD, and as per the District Plan contributes to the heritage character of the heritage conservation district.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 23, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 106 Glen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86219.pdf
Attachment 1 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 106 Glen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86220.pdf
Attachment 2 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 106 Glen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86221.pdf
Attachment 3 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 106 Glen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86222.pdf

16a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 106 Glen Road

Origin
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board December 15, 2015, considered a report (November 23, 2015) from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 106 Glen Road.

Background Information (Community Council)
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 106 Glen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87132.pdf

TE13.17 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 450 Yonge Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a five-storey rooftop addition and interior alterations to the existing building on the lands known municipally in 2015 as 450 Yonge Street, with such alterations substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment dated May 8, 2015, prepared by E.R.A. Architects Inc., date-stamped received by Heritage Preservation Services on May 27, 2015, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.  Prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval for the property at 450 Yonge Street, the owner shall:

 

i.  enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 450 Yonge Street substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings dated May 8, 2015 prepared by E.R.A. Architects Inc., date stamped received by Heritage Preservation Services on May 27, 2015 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and in accordance with the Conservation Plan, required in Recommendation 1.a.ii. in the report (November 18, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

ii.  provide a Conservation Plan and an Interpretation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out by ERA Architects Inc. dated May 8, 2015, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

iii.  provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

iv.  provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.ii. in the report (November 18, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.  Prior to the issuance of a heritage permit for the designated property at 450 Yonge Street pertaining to the rooftop addition and interior alterations, but excluding permits for interior work not affecting the heritage attributes of the property, repairs, maintenance and usual and minor works to the property as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

 

i.  have obtained final site plan approval for the property, issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

ii.  provide full building permit drawings including notes and specifications for the conservation, stabilization and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.ii. in the report (November 18, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

iii.  provide a Letter of Credit, including provisions for upward indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan.

 

c.  Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall:

 

i.  provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.  provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.  City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 450 Yonge Street in a form and content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director and City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 450 Yonge Street.

Origin

(November 18, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described in this report for the heritage property located at 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall) in conjunction with a Site Plan application for the construction of a five-storey addition atop the existing four-storey building, provided the existing building is retained, conserved and is subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement.

 

Should City Council endorse this strategy, staff recommends that City Council require the owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City and authorize staff to take the necessary steps to enter into such Heritage Easement Agreement to ensure the long-term protection of 450 Yonge Street.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 18, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86232.pdf
Attachment 1 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86233.pdf
Attachment 2 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86234.pdf
Attachment 3 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86235.pdf
Attachment 4 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86236.pdf
Attachment 5 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86237.pdf
Attachment 6 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86238.pdf
Attachment 7 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86239.pdf
Attachment 8 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86240.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(January 15, 2016) Letter from Rick Whitten-Stovall, President, Bay Cloverhill Community Association (TE.Supp.TE13.17.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58174.pdf

17a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)

Origin
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board December 15, 2015, considered a report (November 18, 2015) from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall).

 

Speakers
Philip Evans, ERA Architects Inc.

Background Information (Community Council)
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 450 Yonge Street (Oddfellows Hall)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87133.pdf

TE13.18 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 1 Front Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1 Front Street West (the "Property") under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 1 Front Street West (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (November 26, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to be effective upon the transfer of the Property by the federal government and that notice of intention to designate be served on the new owner following the transfer of the Property.

 

2.  If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act following the transfer of the Property.

 

3.  If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.  If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the Property.

Origin

(November 26, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1 Front Street West containing the Dominion Public Building (the Property) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) following its transfer from federal government ownership.  The property at 1 Front Street West is managed by the Real Property Branch of Public Works and Government Services Canada (PWGSC), which as a cost-saving measure has declared the property surplus and will proceed with its disposal.

 

In a letter dated May 29, 2015,  Public Works and Government Services Canada requested Heritage Preservation Services to assess the Property to determine whether it merits designation as an individual property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Act.  The Property was designated in 1983 by the Federal Heritage Buildings Review Office (FHBRO) as a "Classified" Federal Heritage Building, the highest ranked category.  It is currently subject to the Treasury Board policies concerning the management and disposition of Federal Heritage Buildings, but will no longer be subject to any federal heritage protections once it leaves the federal inventory.

 

The Property is listed on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register and designated under Part V of the Act as part of the Union Station Heritage Conservation District (USHCD).  However, because the Federal Government is not subject to the Act, compliance on the part of the Federal Government is voluntary.  The HCD designation is confined to the exterior of the building.

 

Designation under Part IV of the Act will enable the protection of cultural heritage value and heritage attributes, including interior features.  As the Federal Government is not subject to the Act, compliance with the designation by-law will be voluntary until such time as the property changes hands.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 26, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 1 Front Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86276.pdf
Attachment 1-2 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 1 Front Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86277.pdf
Attachment 3 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 1 Front Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86278.pdf
Attachment 4 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 1 Front Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86279.pdf

18a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 1 Front Street West

Origin
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board December 15, 2015, considered a report (November 26, 2015) from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 1 Front Street West.

Background Information (Community Council)
(December 17, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 1 Front Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87134.pdf

TE13.27 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 314 Glen Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 314 Glen Road.

Origin

(December 1, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned tree located at 314 Glen Road. The application indicates the reason for the requested removal is the tree's condition.

 

The subject tree is a silver maple (Acer saccharinum) measuring 108 cm in diameter. The subject tree is in good condition, both structurally and botanically.  Urban Forestry does not support removal of the subject tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 1, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 314 Glen Road - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86285.pdf

Speakers

David Boriss

TE13.30 - Hillside Drive, South of Gamble Avenue - Green Street Project

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the concept for the Hillside Drive Green Streetscape project, as shown in Attachment 3 to the report (December 3, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and subject to refinement through detailed design as set out in Recommendation 3.

 

2.  City Council direct Transportation Services (Public Realm) to lead the Hillside Drive Green Streets project in all aspects towards implementation, subject to staff and budget resources available in future budgets.

 

3.  City Council request Transportation Services, with assistance from Toronto Water and Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and in collaboration with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the local Councillor and area residents, to continue to refine the preferred concept based on comments detailed in this report and to determine a detailed design and address the issues raised by the area residents and working group members that are detailed in this report, including the provision of a continuous sidewalk, general accessibility, creation of a walkable grade between the two cul-de-sacs, increased greening within the central green space, and a review of the proposed parking supply.

 

4.  City Council direct Transportation Services staff, in consultation with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and in collaboration with the local Councillor, to consult with the community through the working group program established in this report, to ensure the working group is active throughout the various stages of detailed design and implementation, and to finalize a terms of reference for the working group prior to any future meeting of the working group.

 

5.  City Council request Transportation Services to continue to use the Public Consultation Unit of Policy, Planning, Finance and Administration to support community consultation for the project.

 

6.  City Council request staff from the various divisions involved in the Green Streets program to review the possibility of including the Hillside Drive Green Streetscape project as part of a potential pilot project within the Green Streets program.

 

7.  City Council request staff from Transportation Services to further review the parking requirement and demand on Hillside Drive, within the scope of the Hillside Drive Green Streetscape project, and determine if the reduction of parking by 14 spaces is required to be adjusted.

 

8.  City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to review the Official Plan land use designation for the vacant parcel of land at the southwest corner of Broadview and Gamble Avenues through the Broadview Avenue Planning Study.

 

9.  City Council direct Transportation Services (Public Realm) to hire, as required, multi-disciplinary practitioners with expertise in low impact development street design.

Origin

(December 7, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On August 25, 2014, City Council directed City Planning, Transportation Services, Toronto Water, and Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, the Ward Councillor, and area residents, to address matters regarding the Hillside Drive - Green Street Project through the development of several green streetscape options.  In addition, City Council directed City Planning staff to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015 regarding the preferred green streetscape option for Hillside Drive.

 

This report summarizes the efforts of City Planning, Transportation Services, Toronto Water, and Parks, Forestry and Recreation to prepare green streetscape options and brings forward a preferred streetscape direction for Hillside Drive.

 

Further, this report recommends a working group format to involve the local community in the implementation of the green streetscape options and outlines potential partnership scenarios and funding sources.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 7, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Hillside Drive, South of Gamble Avenue - Green Street Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87037.pdf

TE13.31 - Permanent Closure to Vehicular Traffic of a 0.3 Metre Wide Strip of the East Limit of Hillside Drive at the rear of 1132 Broadview Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bill 76 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council permanently close to vehicular traffic a 0.3 metre wide strip of land on the east side of Hillside Drive, designated as Part 4 on Plan 66R-27544 (the "Highway"), and attached to the report dated December 2, 2015, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report dated December 2, 2015, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on January 19, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's website.

Origin

(December 2, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services recommends that a 0.3 metre wide strip on the east side of Hillside Drive, at the rear of 1132 Broadview Avenue, be permanently closed to vehicular traffic.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 2, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Permanent Closure to Vehicular Traffic of a 0.3 Metre Wide Strip of the East Limit of Hillside Drive at the rear of 1132 Broadview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86970.pdf
Appendix A - Permanent Closure to Vehicular Traffic of a 0.3 Metre Wide Strip of the East Limit of Hillside Drive at the rear of 1132 Broadview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86972.pdf
Reference Plan 66R-27544 - Permanent Closure to Vehicular Traffic of a 0.3 Metre Wide Strip of the East Limit of Hillside Drive at the rear of 1132 Broadview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86973.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(January 18, 2016) Letter from Mark A. Piel, Dentons Canada LLP, on behalf of The Governing Council of The Salvation Army in Canada (TE.Supp.TE13.31.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58452.pdf

TE13.40 - Construction Staging Area - Ossington Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 116 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the closure of the east side sidewalk and curb lane on Ossington Avenue fronting 109 Ossington Avenue for 19 months, from December 1, 2015, to June 30, 2017, as shown on Drawing No. 421G-1968 attached to the report (December 11, 2015), entitled “Construction Staging Area - Ossington Avenue", from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.  City Council enact "No Stopping Anytime", on both side of Ossington Avenue from Argyle Street to Humbert Street for the duration of the lane closure outlined in Recommendation 1.

 

3.  City Council adjust the "No Stopping 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday, except public holidays" on the east side of Ossington Avenue from Queen Street West to Harbord Street to apply from Queen Street West to Humbert Street and from Argyle Street to Harbord Street for the duration of the lane closure outlined in Recommendation 1.

 

4.  City Council adjust the "No Stopping 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Monday to Friday, except public holidays" on the west side of Ossington Avenue from Queen Street West to Dundas Street West to apply from Queen Street West to Humbert Street and from Argyle Street to Dundas Street West for the duration of the lane closure outlined in Recommendation 1.

 

5.  City Council directed the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

6.  City Council directed the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

7.  City Council direct that Ossington Avenue be returned to its pre-construction parking and traffic regulations when the project is completed.

Origin

(December 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Ossington Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting closure of the east side sidewalk and curb lane on Ossington Avenue between Humbert Street and Argyle Street, for a period of 19 months to enable construction of a 6-storey condominium. A temporary pedestrian walkway will be established in the east curb lane fronting 109 Ossington Avenue.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - Ossington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86899.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1968 - Construction Staging Area - Ossington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87000.pdf

TE13.42 - Construction Staging Area - 40 Wellesley Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 123 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the closure of the sidewalk and a portion of curb lane on the north side of Wellesley Street East, between a point 119.0 metres east of Yonge Street and a point 148.0 metres east of Yonge Street, from December, 2015 to October, 2017.

 

2.  City Council approve the temporary removal of the existing pedestrian crossover on Wellesley Street East at a point 146.3 metres east of Yonge Street.

 

3.  City Council approve the temporary installation of a pedestrian crossover on Wellesley Street East at a point approximately 212.6 metres east of Yonge Street.

 

4.  City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.
 

5.  City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

6.  City Council direct that Wellesley Street East be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

Origin

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Wellesley Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Cresford Developments is constructing a 35-storey condominium at 40 Wellesley Street East.  They need to close the north sidewalk, a portion of the north curb lane and north bike lane on Wellesley Street East from December 1, 2015 to October 31, 2017, in order to do their work.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 10, 2015) Revised Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - 40 Wellesley Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87003.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-2013 - Construction Staging Area - 40 Wellesley Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87004.pdf

TE13.43 - Construction Staging Area - 50 Wellesley Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the closure of the sidewalk and a portion of the curb lane on the north side of Wellesley Street East, between Yonge Street and Church Street, from December 1, 2015 to October 31, 2017.

 

2.  City Council direct that Wellesley Street East be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

3.  City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

4.  City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

Origin

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Wellesley Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Plazacorp Investments Limited is constructing a 37-storey condominium at 50 Wellesley Street East.  They need to close the north sidewalk, a portion of the north curb lane and north bike lane on Wellesley Street East in order to do their work.

 

Plazacorp Investments Limited also needs to close the south curb lane and sidewalk on Dundonald Street.  This matter is dealt with in a companion report "Construction Staging Area - 31-35 Dundonald Street" requiring Toronto and East York Community Council approval.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - 50 Wellesley Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87005.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-2014 - Construction Staging Area - 50 Wellesley Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87006.pdf

TE13.44 - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - 90 Harbour Street and 1 York Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the continuation of the closure of the north sidewalk and part of the curb lane on Harbour Street, between York Street and a point 173 metres east, from December 31, 2015 to May 31, 2016.

 

2.  City Council approve the continuation of the closure of the east sidewalk and part of the curb lane on York Street, between Harbour Street and Lake Shore Boulevard West, from December 31, 2015 to March 25, 2016.

 

3.  City Council direct that Harbour Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

4.  City Council direct that York Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

Origin

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As Harbour Street and York Street are major arterials, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to continue the closure of the north sidewalk and part of the curb lane on Harbour Street, between York Street and a point 173 metres east, and the east sidewalk and part of the curb lane on York Street, between Harbour Street and Lake Shore Boulevard West, since the building construction at this property is not yet complete.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 10, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - 90 Harbour Street and 1 York Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87001.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-2006 - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - 90 Harbour Street and 1 York Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87002.pdf

TE13.50 - Installation/Removal of On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces - January 2016 (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
18 - Davenport, 21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 94 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the installation/removal of on-street accessible parking space at the locations identified in Appendix A attached to the report (December 14, 2015) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York Community Council.

Origin

(December 14, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation/removal of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities. As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject streets, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 14, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Installation/Removal of On-Street Accessible Parking Spaces - January 2016 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87015.pdf

TE13.54 - Pay-and-Display Parking - Bathurst Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bills 117 and 118 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council rescind the existing "Pay-and-Display parking, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday; 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday" regulation for a maximum period of 3 hours, at a rate of $2.00 per hour, on the east side of Bathurst Street, between Wolseley Street and Eden Place.

 

2.  City Council approve the implementation of a "No Stopping, Anytime" regulation on the east side of Bathurst Street, between Carr Street and Eden Place.

 

3.  City Council amend the existing "No Stopping from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays" on the east side of Bathurst Street, between Adelaide Street West and Burton Road, to operate between Adelaide Street West and Eden Place, and between Carr Street and Burton Road.

Origin

(November 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bathurst Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

The TTC has requested Transportation Services to amend the parking regulations on Bathurst Street, between Carr Street and Eden Place to accommodate TTC's streetcar stop relocation project. Transportation Services has no objection to TTC's request which will result in amending the Pay-and-Display parking regulation on the east side of Bathurst Street to support the streetcar stop relocation.  This TTC project aligns existing mid-block streetcar stops closer to signalized intersections in order to accommodate the new lower-floor TTC streetcars. The proposed changes on Bathurst Street will not result in the loss of any on-street parking spaces.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Pay-and-Display Parking - Bathurst Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86978.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1982 - Pay-and-Display Parking - Bathurst Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86979.pdf

TE13.57 - Parking Amendments - St. Clair Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 119 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve a "No Stopping, Anytime", regulation on the south side of St. Clair Avenue West, from Christie Street to a point 30.5 metres east of Christie Street.

 

2.  City Council amend the "No Stopping, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday" regulation on the south side of St. Clair Avenue West, from Winona Drive to Vaughan Road, to operate from Winona Drive to Christie Street and from a point 30.5 metres east of Christie Street to Vaughan Road.

Origin

(November 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval authority from City Council to implement a "No Stopping, Anytime" regulation on the south side of St. Clair Avenue West, from Christie Street to a point 30.5 metres east.

 

The implementation of a stopping prohibition at this location will discourage motorists from parking in this area and will assist the 126 Christie bus in making a northbound right-turn without being impeded by parked vehicles.  The proposed change will eliminate all curbside opportunities for loading and unloading passengers and goods at this location.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Parking Amendments - St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86825.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1983 - Parking Amendments - St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86826.pdf

TE13.66 - Parking Regulations - Eastern Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Bill 95 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the existing "No Stopping 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., except Saturday, Sunday and Public Holidays" regulation on the north side of Eastern Avenue, between Connaught Avenue to Coxwell Avenue, to be in effect from Woodfield Road to Coxwell Avenue.

 

2.  City Council amend the existing "No Stopping 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., except Saturday, Sunday and Public Holidays" regulation on the south side of Eastern Avenue, between Connaught Avenue to Coxwell Avenue, to be in effect from Woodfield Road to Coxwell Avenue.

Origin

(December 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Eastern Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

In February 2013, City Council approved the road alteration  and amendments to the traffic regulations on Eastern Avenue, between a point 75 metres west of Minto Street and Woodfield Road, to allow for the reconstruction of the TTC Russell Yard.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to amend the existing no stopping peak period regulations on Eastern Avenue.  It currently operates from Connaught Avenue to Coxwell Avenue.  This report will correct the discrepancy and enact the regulation to operate from Woodfield Road to Coxwell Avenue. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Parking Regulations - Eastern Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86939.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1998 - Parking Regulations - Eastern Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86940.pdf

TE13.68 - 40 km/h Speed Limit - Vaughan Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 96 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the 40 km/h speed limit on Vaughan Road, from the northwest end of Vaughan Road to Arlington Avenue, to operate from the northwest end of Vaughan Road to Bathurst Street. 

Origin

(November 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Vaughan Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to approve a reduction in the existing speed limit on Vaughan Road, between Arlington Avenue and Bathurst Street, from 50 km/h to 40 km/h.

 

A 40 km/h speed limit is technically warranted as it will promote slower operating speeds for motorists and will result in a consistent speed limit over the entire length of Vaughan Road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - 40 km/h Speed Limit - Vaughan Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86845.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1989 - 40 km/h Speed Limit - Vaughan Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86846.pdf

TE13.72 - Traffic Control Signals - Gerrard Street East and Scarborough Road/Dengate Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals on Gerrard Street East at Scarborough Road/ Dengate Road.

Origin

(December 8, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Gerrard Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services has undertaken an operational review of the intersection of Gerrard Street East and Scarborough Road/Dengate Road. The results of our review indicate that the installation of traffic control signals is not technically warranted as the existing pedestrian crossover is serving the pedestrian crossing demand safely.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 8, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Control Signals - Gerrard Street East and Scarborough Road/Dengate Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86957.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1996 - Traffic Control Signals - Gerrard Street East and Scarborough Road/Dengate Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-86958.pdf

Speakers

Adrienne Guthrie
Dianne Wong-Roland

TE13.77 - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events Up to July 3, 2016

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant an exemption to the Community Folk Art Council of Toronto, CAAMA,  Ontario Farm Fresh Marketing Association and Toronto Downtown Jazz Society to operate a beer garden and to serve wine and hard liquor contingent upon the following conditions:

 

a.  approval of the A.G.C.O.


b.  approval of the Medical Officer of Health


c.  compliance with the City of Toronto’s Municipal Alcohol Policy


d.  receipt of all the necessary permits associated with the production of the event i.e., building permit, noise by-law extension permit.

 

2.  City Council grant permission to the Canadian Transplant Association, CAAMA, Trek for Teens Foundation, Schizophrenia Society of Ontario, Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Toronto, Camp Jumoke, United Way, Make-a-Wish Canada and Toronto Downtown Jazz Society to solicit donations in support of their organizations.

 

3.  City Council grant permission to Toronto Downtown Jazz Society to host “ticketed performances and to solicit donations in support of their organization.

 

4.  City Council require that the various events compensate the City of Toronto, through the Facilities Management Division, for all City of Toronto expenses associated with an event above the standard staffing compliment.

Origin

(November 6, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request various exemptions from Municipal Code Chapter 237 “Nathan Phillips Square” for the following events to be held on Nathan Phillips Square during the first six months of 2016:

 

- The Canadian Transplant Association – "Canadian Transplant Games Launch"
- Trek for Teens Foundation's "Trek for Teens"
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Toronto's "Boys and Girls Clubs – Capital One Race for Kids"
- Schizophrenia Society of Ontario’s “Walk for Schizophrenia”
- Camp Jumoke’s “Camp Jumoke Walk”
- United Way's "Scotia Bank Rat Race"
- Make-a-Wish Canada - "Make a Wish"
- The Toronto Downtown Jazz Society’s “TD Canada Trust Downtown Jazz Festival”
- CAAMA's "Canadian Music Week"
- Ontario Farm Fresh Marketing Association "Farmers Market"

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 6, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events up to July 3, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-85578.pdf

TE13.80 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
14 - Parkdale-High Park, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 29 - Toronto-Danforth, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 31 - Beaches-East York, 32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Communications TE13.80.25 to TE13.80.28 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.  City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following requests, noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable By-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio area extending into the City's right of way:

 

1.  Temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m., for the following venues during the 30th Annual Toronto Jazz Festival, to be held from June 24 to July 3, 2016:

 

The Painted Lady
Three other Festival venues to be determined.

 

2.  Temporary liquor licence/patio extension for the outdoor concrete patio area and adjacent portions of the private parking lot during the Ideacity Closing Night Party to be held on Friday, June 17, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at 64 Jefferson Avenue.

 

3.  Temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. each day from February 11 to 14, 2016, for The Garrison, 1197 Dundas Street West, during The Wavelength Music Festival 16.

 

4.  Temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. each day for La Vie Complex, 224 Richmond Street West, from February 11 to 14, 2016, as part of the NBA All-Star Weekend 2016.

 

5.  Temporary liquor licence extension from 8:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. on February 11, 2016, for an event to be held during the NBA All Star Week Celebration at Andrew Richard Designs and Events, in the Atrium (ground level floor), 571 Adelaide Street East.

 

6.  Temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for Hi-Fi Musical Adventure 2016 events to be held from March 10 to 12, 2016 (including to 4:00 a.m. on March 13, 2016) at the following locations:

 

The Silver Dollar Room, 486 Spadina Avenue
The Old Laurel, 300 College Street

 

7.  Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions for the following establishments during the 2016 Dundas West Fest to be held on June 11, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Dundas Street West between Lansdowne Avenue and Shaw Street:

 

Dundas Street West

1729                            Branca
1665                            Wallflower
1635                            Swan Dive
1608                            Bola Bar
1602                            Half Point
1600                            Bivy
1588                            CAFÉ+BAR+PASTA
1576                            *
1574                            Black Dice
1570                            Amigos da Dundas
1566                            Brazil Bakery
1560                            Bairrada
1603                            Pho Phuong
1595                            Four Aces
1585                            Lula Lounge
1532                            *
1516                            The Derby
1484                            The Cure
1543                            Brockton Bar & Sports
1454                            Antler
1442                            Sukho Thai
1438                           The Federal
1436                            Midfield
1415                            Unlovable
1430                            Loveless
1424                            Gayley's
1422                            Eggs Sunrise
1405                            Europa catering
1375                            Solita
1371                            E L Ruddy
1369                            Sex Laser
1288                            Enoteca Sociale
1282                            The Saucy Pierogi
1280                            The Dock Ellis
1276                            Goleard's Sports Bar
1321                            Porter House
1307                            Universal Billiards
1305                            Remix Lounge
1265                            Mr. Flamingo
1261                            Fountain
1247                            Milk Glass
1242                            Brazilian Star
1216                            Ufficio
1212                            Churchill
1172                            Nova Era
1166                            The Contender
1164                            Ossington Stop
1209                            Caldense Bakery
1197                            The Garrison
1185                            The Red Light
1181                            Get Well
1173                            Camp 4
1149                            Communist's Daughter
1132                            Lakeview Diner
1116                            First Choice
1112                            Opera Bobs
1108                            Bunda Lounge
 
 * license transfer/new establishment's name unknown

 

8.  Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions during the BIG on Bloor Festival to be held on July 23, 2016 from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., and July 24, 2016 from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m., on Bloor Street West, from Dufferin to Lansdowne (list of establishments participating to be submitted at a later date).

 

B.  City Council approve the following road closures:

 

1.  Closure of north curb lane of Wellington Street West from John Street to Simcoe Street for load in, event dates and load out, during the World MasterCard Fashion Week event to be held from March 14 to 18, 2016 at David Pecaut Square, 55 John Street.

 

2.  Closure of Dundas Street West, between Lansdowne Avenue and Shaw Street during 2016 Dundas West Fest to be held on June 11, 2016, from 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight.

 

3.  Closure of Bloor Street West from Dufferin to Lansdowne during the BIG on Bloor Festival to be held on July 23, 2016 from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. and July 24, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council, under its delegated authority, declared the following to be events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes:

 

1.  Toronto's Festival of Beer to be held at The Bandshell Park, Exhibition Place, on the following dates:

 

July 22, 2016, from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
July 23, 2016, from 12 noon to 8:00 p.m.
July 24, 2016, from 12 noon to 8:00 p.m.

 

2.  Toronto Food + Drink Market to be held at the Enercare Centre, Exhibition Place, on the following dates:

 

April 8, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
April 9, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.
April 10, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.

 

3.  World MasterCard Fashion Week to be held at David Pecaut Square, 55 John Street, from March 14 to 18, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. each day.

 

4.  The 30th Annual Toronto Jazz Festival to be held at various locations in the City, from June 24 to July 3, 2016.

 

5.  The Ideacity Closing Night Party to be held at 64 Jefferson Avenue, on Friday, June 17, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.

 

6.  2016 Pride Toronto to be held from June 24, 2016 to July 3, 2016, with all major events and road closures to take place on the weekend of July 1, 2016 until July 3, 2016.

 

7.  Toronto Taste 2016 to be held at Corus Quay, 25 Dockside Road, on Sunday, June 12, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

 

8.  Event to showcase LGBT Talent to be held at CineCycle, 129 Spadina Avenue, on January 23, 2016, from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.

 

9.  Taste of Toronto 2016, to be held on the following dates at Fort York National Historic Site, 250 Fort York Boulevard:

 

June 23, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.
June 24, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 4:00 p.m., and 5:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
June 25, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 4:00 p.m., and 5:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
June 26, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 5:00 p.m.

 

10.  The Wavelength Music Festival 16, to be held on the following dates:

 

February 11-14, 2016 - The Garrison, 1197 Dundas Street West from 7:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

 

February 13, 2016 – Markham House, City Building Lab, 610 Markham Street from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m.

 

11.  Opening Night Party of The Artist Project to be held on February 18, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., at the Better Living Centre, Exhibition Place.

 

12.  Amendment to the dates for Canadian Music Week, to be held from May 2-8, 2016, rather than May 4-14, 2016 (as originally approved by the Toronto and East York Community Council on November 10, 2015 under TE12.90); and noting that extended licensing until 4:00 a.m. (indoors only) from May 4, 2016 to 4:00 a.m. on Monday, May 9, 2016 will only be offered to those venues previously approved by City Council on December 10, 2015 under TE12.90.

 

13.  The Danforth Mosaic BIA's "The Danny Loves Music 2016 Series" to be held at East Lynn Park, from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. on the following dates:

 

Friday, July 1, 2016
Wednesday, July 6, 2016,
Wednesday, July 13, 2016
Wednesday, July 20, 2016
Wednesday, July 27, 2016

 

14.  Toronto Food Truck Festival to be held at Woodbine Park, on the following dates:

 

July 29 and 30, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m.
July 31, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 9:00 p.m.

 

15.  The 2016 Last Wednesdays events to be held at the 401 Richmond Building, 401 Richmond Street West from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on the following dates:

 

March 30, 2016
April 27, 2016
May 25, 2016
June 29, 2016
July 27, 2016
September 28, 2016
October 26, 2016
November 30, 2016

 

16.  Sound Travels: An Exploration of the Sound Maker's Journey to be held on March 19, 2016, from 7:30 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at Gallery 345, 345 Sorauren Avenue.

 

17.  Hi-Fi Musical Adventure 2016 to be held from March 10 to 12, 2016 (including to 4:00 a.m. on March 13, 2016) at the following locations:

 

The Silver Dollar Room, 486 Spadina Avenue
The Old Laurel, 300 College Street

 

18.  Santa Cruz Church's Holy Spirit Festival and Our Lady of Angels event to be held on June 25 and 26, 2016, at Santa Cruz Church, 142 Argyle Street.

 

19.  2016 Dundas West Fest to be held on June 11, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Dundas Street West between Lansdowne Avenue and Shaw Street.

 

20.  2016 Beach BBQ and Brews Festival to be held at Woodbine Park on the following dates:

 

June 17, 2016, from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.
June 18, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m.
June 19, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m.


21.  The Brewers Plate 2016 to be held at Corus Quay on May 18, 2016, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

 

22.  The BIG on Bloor Festival to be held on July 23, 2016 from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., and July 24, 2016 from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m., on Bloor Street West, from Dufferin to Lansdowne.

Summary

Seeking Endorsement of events for Liquor Licensing Purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(November 13, 2015) Letter from Les Murray requesting that the Toronto's Festival of Beer 2016, to be held at The Bandshell Park, Exhibition Place on July 22, 2016, from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., July 23 and July 24, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE13.80.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57321.pdf
(November 16, 2015) Letter from Lisa Melander requesting that the Toronto Food + Drink Market to be held on April 8 and 9, 2016 from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. and on April 10, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., at the Enercare Centre, Exhibition Place, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE13.80.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57344.pdf
(November 18, 2015) Letter from Carolyn Quinn requesting that World MasterCard Fashion Week to be held from March 14 to 18, 2016, at David Pecaut Square, 55 John Street, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:30 p.m., each day, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of the temporary closure of the north curb lane of Wellington Street West from John Street to Simcoe Street for load in, event dates and load out. (TE.Main.TE13.80.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57521.pdf
(November 24, 2015) Letter from Patti Marshall requesting that the 30th Annual Toronto Jazz Festival, to be held from June 24 to July 3, 2016, at various locations in the City, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for The Painted Lady and three other Festival venues to be determined, for the duration of the Festival. (TE.Main.TE13.80.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57522.pdf
(November 23, 2015) Letter from Richard Robertson requesting that the "ideacity Closing Night Party", to be held on June 17, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. at 64 Jefferson Avenue, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for the outdoor concrete patio section and a portion of the private parking lot during this event (TE.Main.TE13.80.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57523.pdf
(December 30, 2015) Letter from Jaime Martino, Director of Operations, Pride Toronto, requesting that the 2016 Pride Toronto event to be held from June 24, 2016 to July 3, 2016, with all major events and road closures to take place on the weekend of July 1, 2016 to July 3, 2016, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE13.80.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57558.pdf
(December 1, 2015) Letter from Jennifer Chow, Second Harvest, requesting that Toronto Taste 2016 event to be held on Sunday, June 12, 2016, from 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at Corus Quay, 25 Dockside Road, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE13.80.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57611.pdf
(December 3, 2015) E-mail from Kay Larose requesting that an event to be held on January 23, 2016, at CineCycle, 129 Spadina Avenue, from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE13.80.8)
(December 8, 2015) Letter from Jeanette McFarlane requesting that Taste of Toronto 2016 to be held at the Fort York National Historic Site, 250 Fort York Boulevard on June 23, 2016 from 5:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., June 24 and 25, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and June 26, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE13.80.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57847.pdf
(December 14, 2015) Letter from Jonathan Bunce requesting that the Wavelength Music Festival 16 to be held from February 11-14, 2016, from 7:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. at The Garrison, 1197 Dundas Street West and on February 13, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. at the Markham House City Building Lab, 610 Markham Street, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. at The Garrison venue only during this Festival (TE.Main.TE13.80.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57848.pdf
(December 18, 2015) Letter from Deborah Fursey, Informa Canada, requesting that The Artist Project to be held from February 18-21, 2016 at the Better Living Centre, Exhibition Place from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., with the special occasion permit for the Opening Night Party on February 18, 2016 only, be declared an event of municipal significance (TE.Main.TE13.80.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57833.pdf
(December 17, 2015) Letter from Cameron Wright, Canadian Music Week, requesting that the dates for Canadian Music Week (approved by the Toronto and East York Community Council on November 10, 2015 (TE12.90) as an event of municipal significance be amended to take place from May 2-8, 2016, rather than May 4-14, 2016; and noting that extended licensing until 4:00 a.m. (indoors only) from May 4, 2016 to 4:00 a.m. on Monday, May 9, 2016 will only be offered to those venues previously approved by City Council on December 10, 2015. (TE.Main.TE13.80.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57852.pdf
(December 30, 2015) Letter from Oliver Hierlihy, Coordinator, Danforth Mosaic BIA requesting that the Danforth Mosaic BIA's summer music festival, The Danny Loves Music 2016 Series, to be held on July 1, July 6, July 13, July 20 and July 27, 2016, at East Lynn Park, from 5:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. each day, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.13)
(January 7, 2016) Letter from Ben Freeman, Executive Director, Toronto Food Truck Festival, requesting that the Toronto Food Truck Festival to be held on July 29 to 30, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m. and on July 31, 2016, from 12:00 noon to 9:00 p.m., at Woodbine Park, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-57963.pdf
(January 11, 2016) E-mail from Cynthia Mykytyshyn, Urban Space, requesting that the 2016 Last Wednesdays events to be held at the 401 Richmond Building, 401 Richmond Street West from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on the following dates: March 30, 2016, April 27, 2016, May 25, 2016, June 29, 2016, July 27, 2016, September 28, 2016, October 26, 2016 and November 30, 2016, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.15)
(January 11, 2016) E-mail from Debbie Goncalves, General Manager, La Vie Complex, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. each day for La Vie Complex, 224 Richmond Street West, Toronto, from February 11 to 14, 2016, as part of the NBA All-Star Weekend 2016. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.16)
(January 12, 2016) E-mail from Jessica Weir, Andrew Richard Designs and Events, requesting that the NBA All Star Week Celebration to be held on February 11, 2016, from 8:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m., at the Andrew Richard Designs, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m.. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.17)
(January 12, 2016) Letter from Faye Blais requesting that Sound Travels: An Exploration of the Sound Maker's Journey to be held on March 19, 2016, from 7:30 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at Gallery 345 (345 Sorauren Avenue), be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58046.pdf
(January 14, 2016) Letter from Amanda Langton, Co-Founder, requesting that Hi-Fi Musical Adventure 16 event to be held from March 10 to 12, 2016, at various locations be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. each day for the The Silver Dollar Room and The Old Laurel (TE.Supp.TE13.80.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58105.pdf
(January 14, 2016) Letter from Louis Silva, Santa Cruz Church, requesting that the Holy Spirit Festival and Our Lady of Angels event to be held on June 25 and 26, 2016, at Santa Cruz Church, 142 Argyle Street, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.20)
(January 13, 2016) Letter from Lubo Brezina, Chair, Dundas West BIA, and Anabela Taborda, Chair, Little Portugal BIA, requesting that the 2016 Dundas West Fest to be held on June 11, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Dundas Street West between Lansdowne Avenue and Shaw Street, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence/patio extensions for the establishments listed in the attachment, and any necessary road closure. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58124.pdf
(January 13, 2016) Letter from Les Murray requesting that the 2016 Beach BBQ and Brews Festival to be held at Woodbine Park on June 17, 2016, from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., June 18, 2016 from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and June 19, 2016, from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58126.pdf
(January 14, 2016) Letter from Les Murray requesting that The Brewers Plate 2016, to be held at Corus Quay on May 18, 2016, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58127.pdf
(January 19, 2016) Letter from Dougal Bichan, Director, requesting that the BIG on Bloor Festival to be held on July 23, 2016 from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, and July 24, 2016 from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m., on Bloor Street West, from Dufferin to Lansdowne, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence/patio extensions for the premises on that section of Bloor Street, together with the necessary road closure. (TE.Supp.TE13.80.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/comm/communicationfile-58461.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(January 31, 2016) Fax from Andy Dunn, Manager, Flynn's Of Temple Bar Pub and Restaurant, requesting a temporary liquor licence/patio extension for St. Patrick's Day festivities to be held from 11:00 a.m. on March 17, 2016 to 2:00 a.m. on March 18, 2016. (CC.New.TE13.80.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58781.pdf
(February 2, 2016) Letter from Jeff Atkinson, President, Honda Indy Toronto, requesting approval of beer gardens/liquor licence/patio extensions for various 2016 Honda Indy Toronto events to be held at various locations between July 11, 2016 and July 17, 2016. (CC.New.TE13.80.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58786.pdf
(February 2, 2016) E-mail from Marisa Rocca, Owner, Sotto Sotto Restaurant, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for an NBA All Star 2016 celebratory event to be held on Saturday, February 13, 2016, from 11:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m. on February 14, 2016. (CC.New.TE13.80.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58755.pdf
(February 2, 2016) E-mail from Helder Ramos, Coordinator, Dundas West Business Improvement Area, providing an updated list of requests for temporary liquor licence/patio extensions during the 2016 Dundas West Fest to be held on June 11, 2016, from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Dundas Street West between Lansdowne Avenue and Shaw Street. (CC.New.TE13.80.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/comm/communicationfile-58756.pdf

TE13.87 - Big Rock Brewery - Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario of its support of the application from Big Rock Brewery, 90 Atlantic Avenue, Toronto, for a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence for sales by the glass from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., seven days a week.

Origin

(January 12, 2016) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 14, Parkdale-High Park

Summary

I have received a communication from the solicitors for Big Rock Brewery from Alberta requesting a resolution from the local Municipal Council in order to obtain a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence, which allows for a "sales by the glass" permit, for their brewery at 60 Atlantic Avenue, Toronto, during the hours of 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., seven days a week.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 12, 2016) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks - Big Rock Brewery - Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-87694.pdf

TE13.91 - Spadina-Peter-Adelaide-Richmond (SPAR) Block

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to:

 

a.  reach out to property owners on the Spadina-Peter-Adelaide-Richmond (SPAR) block to discuss opportunities to work together to improve public realm, mid-block connections, and create new green space;

 

b.  develop a public realm plan for the Spadina-Peter-Adelaide-Richmond (SPAR) block to help guide development proposals and inform the ongoing review of King-Spadina's East Precinct; and

 

c . present the outcome of the above recommendations to the local community in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Origin

(January 19, 2016) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

Jane Jacobs famously wrote that "new ideas must use old buildings" and the dramatic revitalization of King-Spadina over recent decades has demonstrated the truth of this observation. From a derelict warehouse district, the neighbourhood was repurposed by artists and entrepreneurs who built networks of support and knowledge-sharing for unique and innovative endeavors that defied contemporary definition or expectation.

 

At the heart of a block that sustains this spirit today, 401 Richmond is a historic warehouse home to over 140 cultural producers and microenterprises. The intense mixing of a wide variety of people and practices in a single building fuels creativity and produces unexpected results. The block is also home to several warehouses that have been repurposed as commercial offices. The ecosystem of creativity extends beyond 401 Richmond in part thanks to the pedestrian-scale built form and public realm that invites people to regularly travel outside their own studio, office, or workshop.

 

There are also two recent proposals for new condominium towers by the property owners at the east end of the block. One of these has already been submitted as a rezoning application. The City needs to move urgently within its power to protect and enhance the characteristics of this block that make it such a valuable asset to the neighbourhood's vibrancy and our City's cultural life.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 19, 2016) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy - Spadina-Peter-Adelaide-Richmond (SPAR) Block
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88515.pdf

TE13.92 - Parking Regulation Amendments - The Esplanade and Market Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The Speaker ruled that Recommendations 2, 5 and 8 in this Item are not properly before City Council. Those recommendations will be resubmitted to the Toronto and East York Community Council.
Recommendations 1, 3, 4, 6 and 7 are properly before City Council.

Bill 129 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that::

 

1.  City Council enact a "Commercial Loading Zone", on the south side of The Esplanade, between a point 9 metres east of Market Street and a point 31 metres further east, to operate 12:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., and 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday; 2:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., and 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Sunday.

 

2.  City Council enact a "Commercial Loading Zone", on the east side of Market Street, between a point 9 metres north of Wilton Street and a point 14 metres further north, to operate 12:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., and 2:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday; 2:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m., and 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., Sunday.

 

3.  City Council prohibit Standing at all times, on the south side of The Esplanade, between Market Street and a point 9 metres east, and between a point 40 metres east of Market Street and Lower Jarvis Street.

 

4.  City Council prohibit Standing at all times, Monday-Friday; midnight to 3:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., and 5:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., Saturday; midnight to 3:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and 7:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., Sunday, on the south side of The Esplanade, between a point 9 metres east of Market Street and a point 31 metres further east.

 

5.  City Council prohibit Parking at all times, Monday to Friday; midnight to 3:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., and 5:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., Saturday; midnight to 3:00 a.m., 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and 7:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., Sunday, on the east side of Market Street, between a point 9 metres north of Wilton Street to a point 14 metres further north.

 

6.  City Council rescind the standing prohibition at all times on the south side of The Esplanade, between Lower Jarvis Street and a point 30 metres west.

 

7.  City Council rescind the parking prohibition, Monday to Friday, on the south side of the Esplanade, between Market Street and a point 30 metres west of lower Jarvis Street.

 

8.  City Council rescind the parking prohibition at all times on the east side of Market Street, between The Esplanade and Wilton Street.

Origin

(January 18, 2016) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28, Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Summary

As part of the North St. Lawrence Market revitalization process, a Temporary Market has been constructed at 125 The Esplanade. Loading requirements for the farmers do not align with the current parking regulations. It is necessary to adopt amendments to allow for commercial loading zone during the period in which the Temporary Market will be operating.

 

Traffic Operations staff have provided the following recommendations for implementation.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 18, 2016) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell - Parking Regulation Amendments - The Esplanade and Market Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-88516.pdf

New Business - Meeting 12

CC12.1 - Interim Extension of Waterfront Toronto Board Members

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(January 20, 2016) Report from the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint the following members to the Waterfront Toronto Board of Directors, for a term of office ending once City Council appoints their successors:

- Mark Wilson
- Gary Wright

Summary

City Council should re-appoint the City's two current public members of the Waterfront Toronto Board while the recruitment for the new board members is underway.  The current public members' terms expire February 28, 2016 and City Council is expected make new appointment shortly.

Background Information

(January 20, 2016) Report from the City Clerk on the Interim Extension of Waterfront Toronto Board Members (CC12.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88601.pdf

CC12.2 - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension - Schedule and Budget Reset

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Will be the first item of buisness following Member Motions on February 4

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions. Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions.

Origin

(January 26, 2016) Report from the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Recommendations

The City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommend that:

 

1.  Council increase the staff preliminary 2016 Capital Budget and 2017-2025 Capital Plan for the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project by $400 million, with $240 million representing the City of Toronto's share of costs, and the remaining $160 million reflecting the Regional Municipality of York's share.

 

2.  Council reiterate its request to the Province of Ontario to ensure that its contribution to the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project, through the Move Ontario Trust is no less than $1.059 billion as projected at the outset of the project;

 

3.  Council reiterate its request to the federal government to increase its funding for the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project to reflect one-third funding of the original total project cost; and

 

4. Council authorize that the information provided in the Confidential Attachment to the TTC Board's report, attached as Attachment 1 to the report, remain confidential until such time as the TTC has advised the City that all claims and litigation related to the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project are settled. 

Summary

This report transmits the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Board Report of January 21, 2016 entitled "Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension – Schedule and Budget Reset", including its confidential attachment.  The TTC report identifies additional estimated project reset costs of $400 million, bringing the total project budget to $3.184 billion and seeks confirmation from the Councils of the City of Toronto and York Region of funding their respective shares of the increased costs.  The confidential attachment to the TTC Board report discusses legal strategies and other legal exposures due to outstanding claims and litigation matters. 

 

This report addresses the financial impact of the project schedule and budget reset, and seeks the required funding authorities.

Background Information

(January 26, 2016) Report from the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension - Schedule and Budget Reset (CC12.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88638.pdf
Attachment 1 - TTC Transmittal Letter and TTC Board Report including Attachments 1 to 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88639.pdf
Confidential Attachment 4 to the TTC Board Report

CC12.3 - Compliance with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and Health and Safety Awareness Training

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(January 27, 2016) Report from the City Manager

Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receives this report for information.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with divisional completion rates for legislated training requirements under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) and the Occupational Health and Safety Act (OHSA.)

 

Most Divisions have reached substantial completion rates in the legislated training requirements. The Divisions which have not reached substantial completion are working to achieve compliance. All Divisions are using the City's enterprise learning management system to track training and ensure that newly hired employees, employees who have changed positions or have returned to work from a lengthy leave receive the appropriate training.

Background Information

(January 27, 2016) Report from the City Manager on Compliance with Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and Health and Safety Awareness Training (CC12.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88658.pdf
Appendix A - City Divisional Compliance with Legislated Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and Occupational Health and Safety Act Training Requirements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88659.pdf

CC12.4 - Investigation Report Regarding Conduct of Mayor John Tory

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.  Council receive the January 28, 2016 Investigation Report on the Conduct of Mayor John Tory for information.

Summary

At the May 5, 2015 City Council meeting, Mayor John Tory moved a motion to defer consideration of a staff report regarding amendments to standard taxicab regulations. 

 

A member of the public filed a complaint alleging that the Mayor contravened Articles VIII (Improper Use of Influence), IX (Business Relations) and X (Conduct Regarding Current and Prospective Employment) of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (the "Code of Conduct") for, among other things, improperly preferring and supporting the ride-sharing service, commonly known as "Uber" when he moved the motion and made public statements because members of the Mayor's former campaign staff were consultants for Uber.

 

I investigated whether Mr. Tory improperly used the influence of his office to benefit two former members of his campaign team by moving the May 5, 2015 deferral motion in contravention of Article VIII of the Code of Conduct.  Consistent with Part B, section 2 of the Code of Conduct Complaint Protocol for Members of Council (the "Complaint Protocol") I did not investigate other matters alleged in the complaint because the other allegations did not give rise to any possible issues under the Code of Conduct.

 

In the attached report, I concluded that the May 5, 2015 motion was the result of a number of considerations unrelated to the former campaign staff’s involvement, including the desirability of dealing comprehensively with regulation of ground transportation services and the fact that Council was awaiting the outcome of a pending court proceeding with respect to the applicability of the current regulatory scheme to Uber.  Further, I find that Mayor Tory's actions in relation to the motion were unrelated to the interests of his former campaign staff and were not a contravention of Article VIII of the Code of Conduct. 

 

I also find the circumstances that led to the complaint are based on a reasonable concern that an elected official might pay special attention, or provide preferential treatment, to former campaign staff, particularly those who aided the official in winning an election.  Such perceptions may arise any time a former campaign aide lobbies an elected member of Council whom the aide supported.  I therefore take this opportunity to offer some guidance about the interaction between elected officials and those individuals who assist in their campaigns and subsequently lobby the elected official.

 

Part B, s. 6(3) of the Complaint Protocol gives the Integrity Commissioner discretion to make a report to Council about a dismissed complaint in exceptional circumstances.  I conducted a confidential investigation, but the fact of this complaint has been made public.  In my view, it is important and appropriate to bring the fact of the investigation, the findings, and the guidance, to the attention of Council. I am, therefore, filing this report with Council for its information.

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Covering Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Investigation Report Regarding Conduct of Mayor John Tory (CC12.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88690.pdf
(January 28, 2016) Investigation Report from the Integrity Commissioner Regarding Conduct of Mayor John Tory
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88691.pdf

CC12.5 - Investigation Report on Violation of Code of Conduct: Councillor Rob Ford

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.  Council find that Councillor Rob Ford contravened Articles VI (Use of City Resource), VII (Election Campaign Work), and XV (Failure to Adhere to Council Policies and Procedures) when he included a campaign fundraiser advertisement in his newsletter in April and May 2015 and that Councillor Rob Ford failed to disclose his personal expenses for the newsletter.

 

2.  Council suspend the remuneration (excluding benefits) paid to Councillor Rob Ford for three (3) days.

 

3.  Council direct Councillor Rob Ford to report all personal funds paid by Councillor Rob Ford with respect to the newsletter and if he fails to disclose such funds by February 28, 2016, his remuneration (excluding benefits) be suspended for an additional three (3) days.

Summary

In April and May 2015, Councillor Ford's constituency newsletter, the "Ward 2 Newsletter", included an advertisement for a campaign fundraiser.  A member of the public filed a complaint alleging that including the advertisement was contrary to Articles VI (Use of City Property) and VII (Election Campaign Work) of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (the "Code of Conduct").

 

In the attached report, I find that when Councillor Ford included the advertisement in his newsletter, he used City resources for a purpose related to an election campaign, which is contrary to City policies and the Code of Conduct. 

 

I also find that Councillor Ford contravened Article XV of the Code of Conduct (Failure to Adhere to Council Policies and Procedures) because he failed to disclose his use of personal funds to pay for the newsletter, which I find is a core part of councillors' constituency work and is subject to City policies.  Councillor Ford has previously been warned that using personal funds for his Council work without disclosure is contrary to City policies and the Code of Conduct.

 

Councillor Ford cooperated with this investigation and made no objection to the core principle that City resources should not be used for campaign purposes.  However, in my view, a penalty that contains a component of deterrence is warranted because a prior clear warning has been insufficient to correct Councillor Ford's behaviour

 

In consideration of these factors, I recommend that Council adopt a finding that Councillor Ford's conduct contravened the Code of Conduct and that as a consequence for including an election advertisement in his constituency newsletter and the resultant use of City resources, Council suspend the remuneration (excluding benefits) paid to Councillor Ford for three (3) days.  The value of a three day suspension of remuneration is approximately $900.

 

I also recommend that Council direct Councillor Ford to report all personal funds paid by him with respect to the newsletter and if he fails to disclose such funds by February 28, 2016, his remuneration (excluding benefits) be suspended for an additional three (3) days.

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Covering Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Investigation Report on Violation of Code of Conduct: Councillor Rob Ford (CC12.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88695.pdf
(January 28, 2016) Investigation Report from the Integrity Commissioner Regarding Conduct of Councillor Rob Ford
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88696.pdf

CC12.6 - Office of the Integrity Commissioner - Report on Activity July 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
First item on Thursday, February 4th

The Integrity Commissioner has submitted a presentation on this Item (CC12.6a)

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the Office of the Integrity Commissioner Report on Activity for the period July 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015 for information.

Summary

The Integrity Commissioner reports annually to City Council on the work of the Office. This Report for Action transmits to City Council a Report on Activity of the Office for the last six months of 2015 (July 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015).  The reason the Integrity Commissioner is filing a Report on Activity for a six month period instead of 12 is to transition the Office's reporting period to the calendar year.  The next report on activity from the Office of the Integrity Commissioner will be its 2016 Annual Report.

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Covering Report on the Office of the Integrity Commissioner - Activity July 1, 2015 - December 31, 2015 (CC12.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88702.pdf
(January 28, 2016) Office of the Integrity Commissioner Report on Activity July 2015 - December 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88703.pdf
(February 4, 2016) Presentation from the Integrity Commissioner on Report on Activity July to December 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-90372.pdf

CC12.7 - 200 St. Clair Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Application - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  Council adopt the Confidential Recommendations to staff in Confidential Attachment 2 and authorize the public release of those Recommendations with the balance of the Report remain confidential.

Summary

The Ontario Municipal Board (the "OMB") has set a hearing date for two weeks commencing on Monday, March 14, 2016 to hear the official plan, zoning and site plan appeals regarding 200 St. Clair Avenue West.  Further direction from City Council is required in advance of the hearing.

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor on 200 St. Clair Avenue West - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Application - Request for Direction (CC12.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88724.pdf
Confidential Attachment 2

CC12.8 - 2360-2378 Yonge Street and 31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue - Proposed Zoning By-law - Request for Directions regarding Ontario Municipal Board Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communication that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding litigation.

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  That the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report be made public at the end of the Council meeting.  All other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek further instruction for an Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing on the above-noted matter.  Council previously authorized a settlement in principle for a zoning by-law for the development proposal.  A schedule was established to finalize the proposed zoning by-law in consultation with other affected parties and participants.  However, evolution of certain elements of the development proposal requires Council's further input.  An OMB hearing date to consider the matter is currently being scheduled.

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 2360-2378 Yonge Street and 31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue - Proposed Zoning By-law - Request for Directions regarding Ontario Municipal Board Hearing (CC12.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88677.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC12.9 - 33 Holly Street, 44 Dunfield Avenue, 86 and 88 Soudan Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the Confidential Recommendations to staff in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  The Recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report as well as the information contained in Appendix "A" of Confidential Attachment 1 be made public if Council adopts Recommendation 1.

 

3.  Except as provided in Recommendation 2 above, all other information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

This application proposes two condominium apartment buildings of 24 and 32 storeys attached to two existing, 14-storey rental apartment buildings at 33 Holly Street and 44 Dunfield Avenue; 5-storey additions on top of the two existing rental apartment buildings at 33 Holly and 44 Dunfield; and a 6-storey apartment building at 86 & 88 Soudan Avenue. The new 6-storey apartment building would require the demolition of two rented, single detached houses.

 

The Zoning By-law Amendment application has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) by the applicant due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  At its meeting of May 5, 6 and 7, 2015, City Council directed the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to oppose the proposal in its current form at the OMB.

 

Pre-hearings at the OMB were held on January 30, 2015 and May 25, 2015.  City staff, together with the other parties to the hearing participated in an OMB-led mediation session on December 10 and 11, 2015.  A full hearing for this matter is set to commence on March 21, 2016.

 

Further direction from City Council is required with regard to this matter.

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 33 Holly Street, 44 Dunfield Avenue, 86 and 88 Soudan Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC12.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88675.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on February 11, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-90520.pdf

CC12.10 - 146 and150 Laird Drive - Zoning Amendment - Request for Direction Report - Ontario Municipal Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West

Confidential Attachment - Advice/communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and contains information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(February 1, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

1. City Council adopt the Recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1;

2. The recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 as well as Appendix "A", "B" and "C" to Confidential Attachment 1, be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor; and

3. Except as provided in Recommendation 2 above, all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

The applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) based on the failure of Council to have made a decision within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  The application submitted proposes an 8 storey (9 storey including a greenhouse area), 175 unit rental retirement building (Phase 1) and a 7 storey, 109 unit condominium targeted to seniors (Phase 2) at 146 & 150 Laird Drive.  150 Laird Drive is a property included on the City of Toronto Heritage Register since 2007 (former Durant Motors of Canada, Ltd.) and Council has recently stated its intention to designate.

 

At its meeting of September 30, October 1 and 2, 2015 Council did not support the proposal and adopted the recommendations in the Request for Direction Report of the Director of Community Planning, North York District (August 18, 2015).  The City Solicitor and Staff were directed to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the application.  The hearing is scheduled to commence February 29, 2016 for a two-week period.  Further direction is required from City Council prior to commencement of the hearing.

 

City Planning has been involved in preparation of this report. 

Financial Impact

There are no financial implications resulting from the adoption of this report.

Background Information

(February 1, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 146 and150 Laird Drive - Zoning Amendment - Request for Direction - Ontario Municipal Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-90077.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 146 and 150 Laird Drive - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Request for Direction - Notice of Pending Report (CC12.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88776.pdf

CC12.11 - 3237 Bayview Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Willowdale

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  Council adopt the Confidential Recommendations to staff in Confidential Attachment 1; and

 

2.  Council authorize the public release of the Confidential Recommendations, if adopted, with the balance of the Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential.

Summary

Further direction from City Council is required on a matter that has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board ("OMB").  A hearing has been scheduled for April 4, 2016.  Revised plans have been submitted to City Planning with a covering letter dated January 13, 2016 for review and comment.  This report was prepared in conjunction with City Planning.

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 3237 Bayview Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction (CC12.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88772.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC12.12 - 2779, 2781 Yonge Street and 15-17, 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding litigation

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  The recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report be made public at the end of the Council meeting.  All other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek further instruction for an Ontario Municipal Board hearing of the above-noted matter. A 5-day OMB hearing date was scheduled for January 11, 2016. However, the parties requested the OMB to defer the hearing date in order to enable ongoing discussions. This report seeks Council's further directions in relation to this matter

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 2779, 2781 Yonge Street and 15-17, 19-21 Strathgowan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Directions (CC12.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88774.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC12.13 - Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Further Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation or potential litigation that affects the City

Origin

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 2 of the report (January 28, 2016) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  If adopted, the Recommendations in Confidential Attachment 2 be released when settlement is achieved.

Summary

The City of Toronto passed the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan (CWSP) in April 2003 and subsequently enacted zoning by-laws for East Bayfront (By-law No. 1049-2006) and Keating Channel West (By-law No. 1174-2010).  Owners of seven of the private development sites in the two precincts have appealed these documents to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  City Council at its meeting on December 11, 2014 adopted Attachment 2, the confidential instructions to the report (December 3, 2014) from the City Solicitor.  This report requests further direction for the resolution of appeals to be dealt with by the OMB, currently anticipated to occur in mid-2016.  The resolution of these appeals is an important step in the revitalization of the City's waterfront and the achievement of City building goals, including affordable housing.

 

This report addresses proposed changed terms for settlement from that approved by Council at its meeting on December 11, 2014, and seeks City Council authority to agree to a settlement at the OMB based on the recommendations set out in the Confidential Attachment.  This negotiation process has been lengthy, but has resulted in a proposed resolution with land owners within the East Bayfront and Keating Channel West Precincts.  This report outlines the outstanding issues and requests direction from Council to conclude these discussions regarding the OMB appeals as noted in the Confidential Attachment.  These discussions commenced in September 2013 and were reported on in an "Information Report" to the November 19, 2013, meeting of Community Council:
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.TE28.41

 

Subsequently City Council adopted a series of reports dealing with various aspects of the proposed settlements, as noted below:

March 20, 2014

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2014.TE30.17 
May 6, 7 and 8, 2014

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2014.MM51.46 
July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2014.TE33.19 
August 25,26, 27 and 28, 2014

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2014.CC55.13 
December 11, 2014
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2015.CC2.5

Background Information

(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Further Request for Directions and Attachment 1 (CC12.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-88679.pdf
Confidential Attachment 2

Member Motions - Meeting 12

MM12.1 - Maintaining High Standards for Removing Water from the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River Basin - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council endorse the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative draft Board of Directors Resolution 2016-1B opposing the Waukesha water diversion application.  

 

2.  City Council encourage the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Water Resources Regional Body and Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Council, (the Compact Council) to consider the future implications of this diversion and decline the Waukesha application.

 

3.  City Council request that the Regional Body clarify the public consultation requirements involved in the lead-up to a decision on a diversion application with respect to the kind of information that is provided, where and how it is provided and minimum consultation timeframes. 

 

4.  City Council request the City Clerk to forward a copy of this Motion to the Government of Ontario, (the Premier and the Minister of the Environment and Climate Change) the Government of Québec, (the Premier and the Minister of Sustainable Development, the Environment and the Fight Against Climate Change) the Mayors of Montréal, Québec City, Chicago and Detroit and the Governors represented on the Regional Body and Compact Council.

Summary

The Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River represent the largest body of surface fresh water in the world and are a vibrant, diverse ecosystem that is critically important to the economic wellbeing and quality of life of the Canadian and U.S. populations in the region. The Great Lakes provide drinking water to over 40 million, are home to over 350 species of fish, and contain 84 percent of North America’s freshwater supply.

 

Governments on both sides of the boarder, across eight states and two provinces, have resisted large scale water transfers out of the Great Lakes to ensure the long term prosperity of those communities that depend on the Great Lakes. 

 

On December 13, 2005, the Governors of Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, and the Premiers of Ontario and Québec signed the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Sustainable Water Resources Agreement and the Governors endorsed the companion Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact banning new water diversions from the Basin except in counties straddling the water division line between the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Basin and other basins.

 

Waukesha is in a county that straddles the water division line and there are concerns about whether the application meets other requirements of the Compact and the necessity of diversion to meet the water supply needs of the City of Waukesha proper. The proposed return of water to Lake Michigan through the Root River will cause significant changes to the ecosystem and the River's urban shores and there are concerns about the adequacy of the one meeting in Waukesha review process to address the regional and international impacts of this precedent setting application.

 

After reviewing the City of Waukesha's application to use water from the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin as a source of its drinking water, the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources has recommended approving the application and forwarded its recommendation to the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Water Resources Regional Body and Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Basin Water Resources Compact, (Compact Council) for their consideration. All Great Lakes states forming the Regional Body must vote in favor of the application for it to go forward to the Compact Council, which will make the final decision later in 2016.

 

This Motion attempts to ensure that the highest standards are maintained for removing water from the Basin by supporting the draft resolution of the Board of Directors of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Cities Initiative that opposes the application and encouraging provincial, state and local governments to lend their concerned voices to the discussion that will take place in the lead-up to the decision.

 

The regional body representing municipal governments including the City of Toronto, the Great Lakes and St Lawrence Cities Initiative (GLSLCI), has proposed a resolution for their board to object to the request to divert water outside the Great Lakes basin. The basis for the GLSLCI objection is that the City of Waukesha can meet its water needs without a water diversion from the Great Lakes, and that such a diversion would set a precedent for others to divert more water out of the Great lakes basin.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88715.pdf

MM12.2 - Renewing Call for Improved Rail Safety - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council renew its call for the Government of Canada to improve rail safety in Canada and call on the Government of Canada to:

 

a.  address any outstanding issues in the City Council motions to improve rail safety regulations and operations since the derailment in Lac Megantic on July 6, 2013;

 

b.  increase government regulation and enforcement for the transportation of dangerous substances over rail;

 

c.  provide Transport Canada with the necessary funding and resources to hire and train an adequate number of dangerous goods and rail safety inspectors to ensure proper oversight of the rail industry;

 

d.  provide municipal input into the mandatory railway risk assessment process, which includes identifying and assessing alternative routes for transporting dangerous goods; and

 

e.  prevent the downloading of rail safety and emergency response costs to local taxpayers related to liability insurance and coverage for catastrophic incidents.

Summary

The tragedy in Lac Megantic, on July 6, 2013, and a number of other incidents highlighted deficiencies in rail safety and the transportation of dangerous goods in Canada's urban areas.

 

The Government of Canada is responsible for the safe operations of railways in the country through the Railway Safety Act (1985) and certain other Acts, regulations, standards, guidelines and policies in consequence thereof.

 

On July 16, 2013, City Council adopted MM37.56 and several subsequent motions calling on the Government of Canada to improve rail safety regulations and operations including but not limited to the recommendations of the Railway Safety Act Review.

 

There have been improvements to rail safety lately but there is a great deal of evidence that these have not been enough to address the seriousness of this issue. In October 2015, a derailed train Montreal hit a home leading and subsequently Montreal Mayor to strengthen further rail safety rules. In January 2016, CBC reported about a Transport Canada letter to a major railway about an 'immediate threat' to rail safety due to 'excessive fatigue'. Previous CBC reports have found that:

 

-  Analysis of the railway database kept by the Transportation Safety Board (TSB) that found three times the number of runaway trains than previously reported.

-  That only nine of the 459 runaway-related occurrences - or about two per cent - have been fully investigated by the Transportation Safety Board.

-  Almost a quarter of the 459 runaway occurrences in the past 12 years involved dangerous goods.

 

Further incidents and investigations have community and rail safety groups very concerned and City Council should support their call for further action on this important issue.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88741.pdf

MM12.3 - Expanding the Designated Waterfront Area to include Etobicoke Creek, Don River and Humber River - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager Cluster B, after consultations with the Federal Government, the Province of Ontario, Waterfront Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to report back to City Council on:
 

a.  the process to add Etobicoke Creek, Don River and Humber River to the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation Act "designated waterfront area";

 

b.  the potential benefits for the City of Toronto to expand the "designated waterfront area" to include Etobicoke Creek, Don River and Humber River; and

 

c.  a potential timeline for implementing this change.

Summary

The "designated waterfront area" in the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation Act includes some of Toronto's river systems and their tributaries that flow into Lake Ontario, but not all. Currently only Mimico Creek, Highland Creek and Rouge River are part of the designated waterfront area.

 

By including all of Toronto's river systems and their tributaries that flow into Lake Ontario, Waterfront Toronto would be provided with the opportunity for further revitalization opportunities in these vital City areas. It would also further demonstrate the City of Toronto's commitment to building a sustainable, resilient city with a focus on connectivity through the City's vast network of trails and paths.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-87764.pdf

MM12.4 - In Support of Competitive and Affordable Internet Prices for Toronto - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council support competitive and affordable internet prices for its residents and support the CRTC decision of July, 2015 for large telecom companies to make their fibre-optic networks available to small competitors at wholesale prices.

 

2.  City Council forward a copy of this decision to the Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, the Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, the Minister of Finance, and the Minister of Canadian Heritage.

 

3.  City Council request, similar to the City of Calgary, an opportunity to consult with the Minister relating to the Minister’s recommendation to the Governor-in-Council on Bell’s Petition against the CRTC decision.

Summary

Large cable and telecom providers’ monopolies over telecommunication infrastructure pushed out competition in Toronto for years allowing providers to price gouge and leaving many who cannot afford it without access to the internet.

 

Most, if not all, Torontonians would agree that the monopoly of large companies such as Bell and Rogers over large telecommunications infrastructure should not allow them to charge unreasonable prices. That is why the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), an administrative tribunal of the Federal Government, works to foster competition in telecommunication markets to help ensure everyone has access to quality broadband service at affordable prices.

 

After months of hearings and legal submissions, in July 2015 the CRTC ruled that companies such as Bell, Telus, and Rogers, would have to make their new fibre-optic networks available to small competitors like TekSavvy, Primus and many others at wholesale prices. They did this to drive competition, incent other companies to invest in the network, which they believe will lead to greater choice and make the internet more affordable as companies compete for our dollars.

 

In the fall, Bell filed an appeal of this decision to the new federal government asking them to overrule the CRTC decision. Interested parties had 30 days to respond and recently those responses were made public.

 

The City of Calgary submitted an almost 30 page document in support of the CRTC decision to have a competitive market and affordable internet. They pointed out that Bell’s appeal alleged that the CRTC decision would cause them to reduce their investment in fibre optic and as a result lead to a loss of employment in Canada.  In response to this the City of Calgary argued that:

 

“Bell’s Petition should be recognized for what it is: Bell’s attempt to maintain its dominance as a provider of telecommunications services and potential status as a monopoly provider of FTTP services in the geographical areas of Canada where it provides telecommunications services.”

 

Calgary’s submission outlines in great detail the municipality’s role in this and how cities stand to benefit from the CRTC decision. They also remind us that for more than a century, major telecom companies such as Bell, have benefited from publicly funded support and access to our Right Of Ways and government owned infrastructure, which they have used to build their underground and aboveground networks and many large companies will likely pull fibre optic cable through these existing conduits - significantly reducing their costs.

 

The City of Calgary’s submission on Bell’s appeal of the CRTC decision was comprehensive and clearly explained why increased competition is good for the city and for its residents.

Coalitions and campaigns are emerging across Canada and the US to fight for greater access to and affordability of the internet. Here in Toronto the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) has been running an Internet For All campaign advocating for affordable, high speed internet. They point to Statistics Canada studies showing that 40 percent of Canada’s lowest income households do not have home internet access - excluding them from society, government, and the economy.

 

Making sure that Toronto residents have competitive and affordable internet prices helps to foster transformative change. Internet affordability is as much about fairness as it is about social inclusion, access to employment and government services, and simply making it easier for kids, especially those in low income households, to do their homework.

 

No decision has been made on Bell’s appeal and Council has an opportunity to formally share its position. The CRTC decision to foster competition and innovation as well as affordability is fair to Torontonians and should be upheld.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88726.pdf
(December 21, 2015) Letter from Mayor Naheed K. Nenshi, City of Calgary - Submission Regarding Notice No. DGTP-002-2015, Petition to the Governor in Council concerning Telecom Regulatory Policy CRTC 2015-326 by Bell Canada
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88727.pdf

MM12.5 - Cycling Network Plan and Requesting Information to Consider Building a Minimum Grid - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to include options for funding of $20 million per year and $25 million per year within the next Toronto Cycling Network Plan report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee this spring, in addition to other funding options, so that Council can properly consider the resources required for the implementation of a minimum grid by 2018 and the accelerated implementation of the Cycling Network Plan in less than ten years.

Summary

Transportation Services is currently developing a ten year cycling network plan for expanding and improving the City’s cycling network.  This plan will guide our investments in cycling infrastructure between 2016-2025.

 

City Staff have been conducting a detailed analysis of demand, potential demand, population and employment density, coverage, barriers, safety, connectivity and trip generators. They have been consulting over the last few years with tens of thousands of Torontonians and stakeholders through in person drop-in consultations at our Civic Centres and on major trails, online surveys, the City’s Cycling App, and other avenues.

 

Cycle Toronto, our City’s member-supported cycling advocacy organization, points out that 73 percent of Torontonians say a lack of cycling infrastructure is holding them back from riding more often. In turn, they argue that a grid of protected bike lanes on main streets supported by a network of bicycle lanes and routes on residential roadways will help get more Torontonians to see cycling as a safe option. Cycle Toronto argues that a Minimum Grid of 100 kilometres of protected bike lanes on main streets and 100 kilometres of bicycle lanes on residential streets is the minimum of cycling infrastructure our City needs to get more people cycling. Cycle Toronto has therefore been requesting the City increase its cycling budget to $20 million/year.

 

A majority of Councillors have endorsed Cycle Toronto’s Minimum Grid campaign. Budget Committee requested a Briefing Note on the capital funding required to build a minimum bicycle grid by 2018. The January 18, 2016 Transportation Services - Capital Funding for Cycling Infrastructure Briefing Note said that “...the approximate cost to implement a minimum grid of this nature is $50-$150 million.”

 

At the January 18, 2016 Budget Committee we learned from the General Manager of Transportation Services that when City Staff report out to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee this spring on the Cycling Network Plan, they will be presenting City Council with options for funding such as $12 million/year; and $16 million/year which could maintain existing funding or consider accelerating implementation of the cycling network plan. The amount of funding provided each year will impact how quickly we will be able to build our Cycling Network Plan.

 

If we are to have the opportunity to consider building a minimum grid by 2018 or the Cycling Network Plan in less than ten years, we will need to see annual funding options for Transportation Services that would provide us with the resources to do this. We are therefore requesting that as part of the Cycling Network report to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee this spring, additional funding options be presented for Council’s consideration.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88737.pdf

MM12.6 - Nomination of a Council Member for appointment to the Ontario Good Roads Association - by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Striking Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Grimes, recommends that:

 

1. City Council rescind its previous nomination of Councillor Mark Grimes and nominate Councillor Paul Ainslie for appointment to the Ontario Good Roads Association for a term of office beginning February 24, 2016 and ending February 17, 2017.

Summary

City Council at its December 9 and 10, 2015, meeting in adopting Striking Committee Item ST7.3, nominated Councillor Mark Grimes for appointment to the Ontario Good Roads Association for a term of office beginning on February 24, 2016 and ending on February 17, 2016.

 

Subsequent to Council's nomination, Councillor Grimes has advised the City Clerk that he has regretfully withdrawn from consideration for appointment.

 

The City Clerk recently conducted a canvass of Members for their interest in this nomination.  No Members indicated an interest at that time.

 

Councillor Paul Ainslie has indicated an interest in this nomination, so this Motion proposes to nominate Councillor Ainslie in place of Councillor Grimes. 

 

This Motion is urgent as the Ontario Good Roads Association will make appointments at its Annual General Meeting in February 2016.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88709.pdf
(January 28, 2016) Communication from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore on the Appointment to Ontario Goods Roads Association
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88710.pdf
(January 27, 2016) Communication from Councillor Paul Ainslie, Ward 43, Scarborough East on Ontario Good Roads Association Appointment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88711.pdf

MM12.7 - Appointment of Members to the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Civic Appointments Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, recommends that City Council adopt the following recommendations contained in the report (January 28, 2016) from the City Manager:

 

1.  City Council appoint the twelve individuals named below to the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018, and until successors are appointed:

 

- Yin Brown

- Karma Burkhar

- Darren Cooper

- Martin Courcelles

- Joe Knapper

- Terri-Lynn Langdon

- Rahima Mulla

- Tracy Odell

- Stephanie Ozorio

- Wendy Porch

- Tom Proszowski

- Victoria Warner

 

2.  City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee.

Summary

The purpose of this Motion is to have City Council appoint the 12 public members of the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee.

 

The recruitment for the public members of the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee has been completed.  Candidates have been shortlisted, interviewed, and recommended by the interview panel in accordance with the Public Appointments Policy.  These recommendations are outlined in the attached report (January 28, 2016) from the City Manager.

 

These appointments would usually go to the Civic Appointments Committee for recommendation to City Council.  Given that there are no upcoming scheduled meetings of the Civic Appointments Committee and the urgency of appointing these new members, City Council should waive referral and consider these appointments now.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88766.pdf
(January 28, 2016) Report from the City Manager on Appointment of Members to the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee (DAIAC).
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88767.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary for Recommended Candidates for the Disability, Access and Inclusion Advisory Committee - available for review in the City Clerk's Office by Members of Council only

MM12.8 - Review of the Newsletter Entitlement Budget in the Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to review the Newsletter Entitlement Budget in the Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy and report on options to better facilitiate Councillors' communications with their constituents.

Summary

At its meeting of July 11, 12 and 13, 2012, City Council amended and adopted EX21.9 "Policy Changes to Facilitate Councillor Office Operations", and approved that "Each Councillor be entitled to an amount equivalent to the cost of postage or delivery by other means of one newsletter to all households within the ward, based on the 2011 census information and at a rate not to exceed the current Canada Post standard Admail rate, paid for from the Council General Expense Budget."

 

City Councillors communicate with their residents in a variety of ways. Some distribute newsletters once or twice a year, while others send flyers to different neighbourhoods based on specific community concerns.

 

The current Newsletter Entitlement Budget is too narrow in scope and does not meet the needs of Councillors to communicate with their constituents in a variety of ways, nor does it reflect the need for Councillors to communicate with businesses as well as residents.  

 

Staff should review the Newsletter Entitlement Budget and report on options to amend the budget to better facilitate Councillors' communications with their constituents.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88762.pdf

MM12.9 - Addressing Arbitrary Limitations of Council Staff Severance Packages - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Human Resources, to report to City Council on options to address the current prohibition clause in severance packages for Council staff.

Summary

The current City policy for separation packages for Council staff includes a provision that prohibits the employee from working for the City and certain agencies for two years, irrespective of the amount of severance received. The only exemption is for Council staff, who, if they repay the severance, can return to work for another Member of Council within the two-year period.

 

The limitation of two years was put in place at amalgamation. This two-year limitation has continued since, being applied to all departing Council staff, irrespective of their years of service and the size of the severance package. This limitation seems arbitrary, and is inherently unfair to those employees who have a short service period and thus, are only provided with a very small severance package.

 

For example, an employee who has 18 months of service would receive a severance equivalent to three weeks' of salary. However, the employee cannot come back to work for the City for two years. The formula seems skewed. The time employees are prohibited to return to the City should correspond to the time equivalence of the severance they receive.

 

Staff should review the policy and report to City Council on options to address the current policy for Council staff.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88753.pdf

MM12.10 - Authorization to Release Section 45(9) Funds from 836 St. Clair Avenue West to the Toronto District School Board for a Community Garden at McMurrich Junior Public School - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the 2016 Operating Budget for Non-Program subsequent to the adoption of this budget by $10,000.00 gross, $0 net, (cost centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 45 funds obtained in the development at 836 St. Clair Avenue West (source account: 220096), for the purpose of providing one time capital funding to the Toronto District School Board for the creation of a community garden with art at McMurrich Junior Public School located at 115 Winona Drive.

 

2.  City Council request City staff from the Management Services Branch of the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement and request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Community Planning staff.

 

3.  City Council authorize the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the creation of a community garden with art at McMurrich Junior Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

4.  City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the Toronto District School Board has signed a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the community garden for a minimum of 5 years.

Summary

McMurrich Junior Public School is located in the St. Clair West community.  The school, its School Advisory Council and parent community, initiated the planning for a garden that would provide opportunity to expose and educate their children about agriculture, food security and the City's natural ecosystem.  The benefits of the garden and the students' work will extend beyond the school perimeter to expand our urban green assets and support species at risk.  The addition of art will engage the broader community and attract its members to visit and enjoy the garden.

 

Funds in the amount of $110,000 have been secured and received as a condition of approval of a minor variance (Section 45) application in relation to a development at 836 St. Clair Avenue West (Committee of Adjustment file A0359/15TEY) for improvements to local school playgrounds provided that:

 

a.  there is an agreement in place between the School and the Toronto District School Board to ensure that there is community access for a minimum of 5 years; and

 

b.  the funds will be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the School Board has entered into a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prepared in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.

 

This Motion seeks Council authority to release $10,000 of Section 45 funds received from the development at 836 St. Clair Avenue West to the Toronto District School Board for the purpose of funding the creation of a community garden accented with art at McMurrich Junior Public School located at 115 Winona Drive.

 

A Community Access Agreement to be signed by the Toronto District School Board will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the community garden at the school. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the Board, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88609.pdf
(February 4, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90259.pdf

MM12.11 - Authorization to Release Section 45(9) Funds from 836 St. Clair Avenue West to the Toronto District School Board for the Playground Renewal at West Preparatory Junior Public School - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the 2016 Operating Budget for Non-Program subsequent to the adoption of this budget by $100,000.00 gross, $0 net, (cost centre: NP2161) fully funded by Section 45 funds obtained in the development at 836 St. Clair Avenue West (source account: 220096), for the purpose of providing one time capital funding to the Toronto District School Board for playground and school ground improvements at West Preparatory Junior Public School located at 70 Ridge Hill Drive.

 

2.  City Council request City staff from the Management Services Branch of the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement and request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Community Planning staff.

 

3.  City Council authorize the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the playgrounds at West Preparatory Junior Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

4.  City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the Toronto District School Board has signed a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the playground facilities satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and prepared in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.

Summary

West Prepatory Junior Public School has a playground that requires updating, and grounds that need to be better utilized for its expanding student population.  The school, its School Advisory Committee and parent community, seek to have the school grounds meet different play interests held by varying ages, as well as incorporate outdoor learning opportunities. The school is located in a community with a deficit of open parkland for its members to gather.  The local Councillor and City of Toronto Parks and Recreation Division held a community meeting in 2014 to discuss options for a new outdoor play space where the community could come together to enjoy and share healthy play. This Board-approved playground improvement will provide an imaginative, safe place for students and community members alike.  The school parent community has been able to raise $100,000 toward this project but is still short of the total $200,000 needed to start construction in 2016.

 

Funds in the amount of $110,000 have been secured and received as a condition of approval of a minor variance (Section 45) application in relation to a development at 836 St. Clair Avenue West (Committee of Adjustment file A0359/15TEY) for improvements to local school playgrounds provided that:

 

a.  there is an agreement in place between the School and the Toronto District School Board to ensure that there is community access for a minimum of 5 years; and

 

b.  the funds will be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the School Board has entered into a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prepared in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.

 

This Motion seeks Council authority to release $100,000 of Section 45 funds received from the development at 836 St. Clair Avenue West to the Toronto District School Board for the purpose of funding playground and school ground improvements at West Preparatory Junior Public School located at 70 Ridge Hill Drive.

 

A Community Access Agreement to be signed by the Toronto District School Board will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the playgrounds at the school. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the Board, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88610.pdf
(February 4, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90280.pdf

MM12.12 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue to the Toronto Catholic District School Board for Playground Improvements at Holy Rosary Catholic School - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Excutive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that: 

 

1.  City Council increase the 2016 Operating Budget for Non-Program subsequent to the adoption of this budget by $25,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue (source account: XR3026-3700307), for the purpose of providing one time capital funding to the Toronto Catholic District School Board for playground improvements at Holy Rosary Catholic School located at 308 Tweedsmuir Avenue (cost centre: NP2161).

Summary

This Motion seeks Council authority to release $25,000 in Section 37 funds to the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the purpose of funding playground improvements at Holy Rosary Catholic School located at 308 Tweedsmuir Avenue.  The Section 37 funds have been both secured and received by the City for this purpose from development at 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue.

 

On August 25, 2014 Council amended the zoning by-law for 310-320 Tweedsmuir Avenue to alter the authorized Section 37 community benefits to include $25,000 for playground improvements at Holy Rosary Catholic School.  Council also directed City staff to enter into a Community Access Agreement with Toronto Catholic District School Board to ensure public access to the playground for at least 20 years on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Planner and the City Solicitor, including terms to establish how Toronto Catholic District School Board can use the Section 37 funds.

 

On September 1, 2015, the City and the Board entered in this required Community Access agreement.  Board staff have advised that the playground improvement project has been completed.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88611.pdf
(February 4, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90281.pdf

MM12.13 - Authorization to Release Section 45(9) Funds from 200 Dundas Street East to Food Forward Advocacy Alliance for the Creation of a Community Garden in Allan Gardens - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the 2016 Operating Budget for Non-Program subsequent to the adoption of this budget by $20,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 45 funds obtained in the development at 200 Dundas Street East (source account: 220096), for the purpose of providing one time capital funding to the Food Forward Advocacy Alliance for the creation of a community garden in Allan Gardens (cost centre: NP2161).

 

2.  City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Food Forward Advocacy Alliance upon the signing of an Undertaking by the Food Forward Advocacy Alliance governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

Since its inception in 2010, the Food Forward Advocacy Alliance has been a leader on educating and advocating for healthy food, and inclusive, diverse, ethical, local and resilient community building through food and food policy. The Alliance has supported local businesses and agencies across the City in creating new urban agriculture, community kitchens and food hub projects.

 

Food Forward has been working with Building Roots, Friends of Allan Gardens, Native Women’s Resource Centre, Ryerson University and may other community partners to develop an urban agriculture showcase in Allan Gardens for 2016.  The project, which aligns with various park and neighborhood plans, and helps advance Council’s Grow TO Urban Agriculture Action Plan, will demonstrate the use of urban agriculture container gardens for food, medicinal, herbal and pollinator plants.  The initiative meets existing City and neighbourhood heritage, design, food access, community building, research and public education objectives, and is supported by community stakeholders and City Staff in Parks, Forestry, and Recreation.  

 

Funds in the amount of $150,000 have been secured and received as a condition of approval of a minor variance (Section 45) application for a development at 200 Dundas Street East (Committee of Adjustment file A0836/14TEY) for a number of purposes including $20,000 for Food Forward to create a new community/medicine garden at Allan Gardens.

 

This Motion seeks Council authority to release $20,000 in Section 45(9) funds from the development at 200 Dundas Street East to the Food Forward Advocacy Alliance to provide one-time capital funding for the purpose of creating a community garden within Allan Gardens.

 

Food Forward Advocacy Alliance will sign an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements prior to the funds being released from the City.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88614.pdf
(February 4, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90282.pdf

MM12.14 - Release of Section 37 Funds for Streetscape Improvements at Methuen Avenue and Jane Street within the Baby Point Gates Business Improvement Area - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the approved 2016 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture, subsequent to the adoption of that budget, to create a new capital project named "2016 PAR Baby Point Gates", with total project costs of $80,000 in 2016, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 2500 Bloor Street West (source account: XR3026-3700601), for the purpose of streetscape improvements at Methuen Avenue and Jane Street in the Baby Point Gates Business Improvement Area.

Summary

The City has a long-standing partnership with the Baby Point Gates Business Improvement Area. The BIA is proposing to implement a streetscape improvement project at Methuen Avenue and Jane Street in 2016. However, there is currently no funding included in the 2016 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for this project.

 

The streetscape improvements will create a public space with landscaping and seating area which will act as a gateway to the BIA.

 

Funds have been secured and through a Section 37 agreement for the development at 2500 Bloor Street West (2 Old Mill Drive) for the purpose of Jane Street/Baby Point streetscape improvements, and have been received by the City fund remain uncommitted for this project.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88765.pdf
(February 4, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90283.pdf

MM12.15 - Request for attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 325 Westlake Avenue - by Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
31 - Beaches-East York
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment decision to refuse the consent and minor variance applications related to 325 Westlake Avenue (B0058/15TEY, A0749/15TEY, and A0750/15TEY), and to retain outside consultants, if required.

Summary

On September 24, 2015, the Toronto and East York Panel of Committee of Adjustment refused consent and variance applications to redevelop 325 Westlake Avenue. The decisions of the Committee of Adjustment are attached. City Planning recommended refusal of the applications.  The Planning report dated September 17, 2015 is attached. The applicant has appealed the decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

The applicant is seeking consent to sever the property into two residential lots. The existing building would be demolished and two new two-storey detached dwellings would be constructed. The Committee of Adjustment refused the consent application as the proposed lots did not meet the provisions of Section 51(24) of the Planning Act. The associated minor variance applications were also refused as they did not satisfy the four tests under the Planning Act.

 

On July 31, 2013, similar applications to sever and construct four detached homes at 325 and 323 Westlake Avenue were refused by the Committee of Adjustment. The Committee's decisions were upheld by the Ontario Municipal Board on April 14, 2014 and further clarified on February 9, 2015.

 

I am therefore seeking Council approval to direct staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment decisions of September 24, 2015. This matter is urgent because an Ontario Municipal Board hearing has been scheduled for March 14, 2016.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88612.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York District Notice of Decision on application for Consent and Minor Variance/Permission for 325 Westlake Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88615.pdf
(September 17, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 325 Westlake Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88777.pdf

MM12.16 - Request for Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 161 Palmerston Avenue - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board, together with appropriate Community Planning staff, in support of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in refusing Application No. A0985/15TEY respecting 161 Palmerston Avenue.

Summary

At its hearing on December 3, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment refused variance Application No. A0985/15TEY respecting 161 Palmerston Avenue to construct a new three-story semi-detached dwelling containing three dwelling units. The Committee of Adjustment Decision is attached. In its report dated November 26, 2015 to the Committee of Adjustment, Community Planning recommended that the requested variances be refused. The report of Community Planning is attached.

 

The applicant has appealed the refusal of the Committee of Adjustment to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has not yet been scheduled.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88734.pdf
Committtee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York District Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission and Public Hearing Notice for 161 Palmerston Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88735.pdf
(November 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 161 Palmerston Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88752.pdf

MM12.17 - Request for Attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board - 9 Kintyre Avenue - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a settlement in the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application No. A0876/15TEY in respect of 9 Kintyre Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City in her discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.  In the event a settlement cannot be reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board to support the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in refusing Application No. A0876/15TEY respecting 9 Kintyre Avenue.

Summary

At its hearing on November 4, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment refused Application No. A0876/15TEY respecting 9 Kintyre Avenue. A copy of the Committee's decision is attached. The application was for the purpose of obtaining variances to permit the construction of a new three-storey triplex. City Planning recommended refusal of the application. A copy of City Planning's report dated November 4, 2015 is attached. The applicant has appealed the refusal to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has not yet been scheduled.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88760.pdf
Committtee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York District Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 9 Kintyre Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88761.pdf
(November 4, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 9 Kintyre Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88769.pdf

MM12.18 - Request for Attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board - 249 Booth Avenue - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in refusing Application No. A0784/15TEY respecting 249 Booth Avenue, and authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

Summary

At its hearing on October 21, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment refused variance Application No. A0784/15TEY respecting 249 Booth Avenue to alter the existing two-storey townhouse/rowhouse by constructing a rear two-storey addition and a partial third storey addition.  The Committee of Adjustment Decision is attached.  The Committee of Adjustment determined that the variance application did not satisfy the fours tests under the Planning Act.

 

The applicant has appealed the refusal of the Committee of Adjustment to the Ontario Municipal Board.  A hearing has not yet been scheduled.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88763.pdf
Committtee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York District Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 249 Booth Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88764.pdf

MM12.19 - Objection to Liquor Licence - Lalibela 2 Restaurant - 1202 Danforth Avenue - File No. 203398 - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

 Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:
 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 1202 Danforth Avenue, operating under the name Lalibela 2 Restaurant (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.
 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

Lalibela Two Limited has submitted an expansion application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 1202 Danforth Avenue, operating under the name Lalibela 2 Restaurant (“Premises”). The application is for an additional indoor capacity of 40 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns with respect to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.  

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88657.pdf

MM12.20 - Objection to Liquor Licence Application - To Be Determined - 388 Richmond Street West, Unit 2A - File No. 817816 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 388 Richmond Street West, Unit 2A, operating under the name To Be Determined ("Premises"), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises at 388 Richmond Street West, Unit 2A.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

1938248 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 388 Richmond Street West, Unit 2A, operating under the name To Be Determined ("Premises"). The application is for an indoor capacity of 80 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns with respect to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that City Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88736.pdf

MM12.21 - Objection to Liquor Licence Application - Belfast Love (The) - 548 King Street West - File No. 814171 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 548 King Street West, operating under the name Belfast Love (The) ("Premises"), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises at 548 King Street West.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

Zoe's Bakery Café Ltd. has submitted an expansion application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 548 King Street West, operating under the name Belfast Love (The) ("Premises"). The application is for an additional indoor capacity of 124 persons and an additional outdoor capacity of 55 persons. The Premises currently has an indoor capacity of 146 persons and an outdoor capacity of 65 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns with respect to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that City Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88738.pdf

MM12.22 - Objection to Liquor Licence - Hibachi - 550 Wellington Street West File No. 814423 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 550 Wellington Street West, operating under the name Hibachi (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.
 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

1944683 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 550 Wellington Street West, operating under the name Hibachi (“Premises”). The application is to permit a total indoor capacity of 280 persons and a total outdoor capacity of 152 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns with respect to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.  

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that council consider this matter at this council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88740.pdf

MM12.23 - Objection to Liquor Licence - Grey Gardens/General Public - 199 Augusta Avenue - File No. 817807 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 199 Augusta Avenue, operating under the name Grey Gardens/General Public (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.
 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

Concrete Inc. and General Public Inc. have submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premises at 199 Augusta Avenue, operating under the name Grey Gardens/General Public (“Premises”). The application is for an indoor capacity of 124 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns with respect to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.  

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-88754.pdf

MM12.24 - Requesting a Community Consultation on the Potential Renaming of Caribou Park after Phil Givens - by Councillor Christin Carmichael Greb, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Motion Without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Christin Carmichael Greb, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to undertake community consultation regarding the potential renaming of  "Caribou Park" to "Phil Givens Park", and to report back to the North York Community Council with a recommendation based on the criteria and process outlined in the Property Naming Policy.

Summary

Phil Givens was the Mayor of Toronto from 1963-1966. He also served as North York Member of Provincial Parliament for Armourdale and as an Member of Parliament for York West. Phil had a long connection to North York, where he and his wife, Min Givens, raised their family across from Caribou Park. Phil Givens passed away at the age of 73. His wife Min, age 92, still lives across from the park and has been involved with the recent revitalization project for Caribou Park. The community, with Min's help, has currently raised over $30,000 for new playground equipment and landscaping.

 

Re-naming Caribou Park to Phil Givens Park would be a fitting tribute to the legacy of a former Member of Parliament, Member of Provincial Parliament and Mayor of Toronto.

 

The Property Naming Policy was approved by Toronto City Council in July 2015 and came into effect in October 2015. It outlines the process by which the public can initiate an application for naming or renaming city assets including requirements for community consultation and cost recovery, however Members of City Council are excluded as potential applicants.

 

This Motion is urgent as the renovated park is scheduled to reopen this spring. Staff require the authority to commence the re-naming process under the policy, in lieu of an application, and report back to the relevant Community Council with recommendations in advance of the spring opening.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90097.pdf

MM12.25 - Liquor License Application - 2350 Dufferin Street - Second Beer Bar and Restaurant - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and      

Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) that the liquor licence application for Second Beer Bar and Restaurant, 2350 Dufferin Street (Premises), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) to provide the City with

an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the

Premises.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT

in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to

give effect to Council’s decision, including adding and deleting conditions to any

liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor,

which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, public safety, security

personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Summary

An application for a liquor licence has been made to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for the premise at 2350 Dufferin Street operating under the name Second Beer Bar and Restaurant (Premises).

 

The business operator of Second Beer Bar and Restaurant previously operated next door at 2348 Dufferin Street and had their lease terminated a few months back, after several years of unruly behaviour that resulted in frequent monitoring by the Toronto Police Service.

 

This bar has been the source of many complaints related to: loud noise, public drunkenness, disorderly behaviour, physical altercations, alleged drug dealing, loitering, and public safety concerns, which have seriously detracted from the success and vitality of the local business strip.

 

According to the Toronto Police Service, Second Beer Bar and Restaurant, while previously operating at 2348 Dufferin Street, had been under heightened monitoring for some time due to the time and resources that were required to keep community members safe in and around the establishment. There have been 67 Calls for Service from February 21, 2010 to November 14, 2015. These service calls significantly tie up Police Service resources, often Toronto Paramedic Service Resources, and sometimes Toronto Fire too.

 

Furthermore, since January 22, 2012, 13 Division officers submitted 47 Licence Premises Reports under the Liquor Licence Act. Of those Reports, 13 have resulted in Charges under the Act. The charges have included, but not limited to: No Smart Serve Card; Alcohol being consumed in areas other than allowed by the Liquor Licence; Permit Drunkenness on the Premises; and No Liquor Menu. Criminal Code Charges have included Causing a Disturbance, Obstruct peace Officer and Assault Peace Officer. Officers from 13 Division often attended the premises accompanied by Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Investigators.

 

Most importantly, this business operator is discouraging good people and families with young school-aged children from walking freely along the street and feeling safe, and they've reached a point now, where they can no longer tolerate or be subjected to this inexcusable behaviour. Lastly, the Premises is located in close proximity to residential properties and there is great concern that the establishment will continue to be very disruptive for residents in the area. This application for a liquor licence is, therefore, not in the public interest and must be turned down.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90099.pdf

MM12.26 - 140 Merton Street - Temporary Parking Licence to Support Parents of Children with Autism - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Notice without Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City, as licensor, to enter into a temporary parking licence (the "Temporary Licence"), with the Geneva Centre for Autism (the "Licensee"), for approximately 35 parking spaces at the south east corner of the City-owned land at 140 Merton Street, at a nominal fee for use on an occasional basis during a one (1) year term, terminable by either party on thirty (30) days' notice, with an option for the Licensee to renew the Temporary Licence for a further one (1) year term, on the same terms and conditions, except there shall be no further right to renew the Temporary Licence, and on such other or amended terms as are acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor, and that Council deem this Temporary Licence to be in the interests of the City.

 

2.  City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer or the Director, Real Estate Services severally to execute the Temporary Licence on behalf of the City.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the Temporary Licence, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers and notices, provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of any such matters (including their content) to City Council for its consideration and direction.

Summary

Parents of children who attend a daycare centre for autistic children, the Geneva Centre for Autism, a registered charitable organization, located at 112 Merton Street, require a temporary location to park when dropping off and picking up their children. Part of the City-owned land at 140 Merton Street would meet this need. The portion of the City-owned land considered for this purpose is not currently used by any City Divisions, but the overall site is being considered for repurposing. Accordingly, the proposed licence would only continue until such time as the City determines the future use of the site.

 

This Motion is urgent as a matter of safety. After many years of unsuitable conditions, City Staff have developed a plan that will support a safe drop-off site for the Geneva Centre. To make parents of children with autism continue to dodge traffic when a solution has been found is unnecessary.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90098.pdf

MM12.27 - City Hall Observation Deck - by Councillor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Norman Kelly, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report on allowing public access to the observation deck at City Hall year round and terms and conditions of such access.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to explore the possibility of utilizing space on the observation deck for a café during the warm weather months.

Summary

The only time Torontonians and tourists can access the observation deck at City Hall is, regrettably, during Doors Open Toronto. Offering impressive views of our city, the deck should be more available to the public as decks are in buildings in other jurisdictions across North America. Those buildings offer access to their observation decks for a fee and have done so for many years. With a growing international profile, the city’s City Hall should be promoted as vigorously as possible.

 

This Motion is urgent as Spring is only a few months away and, if the observation deck is to be readied for public access, City staff will need time to research this request, City Council will need time to debate the options and City staff to make any required physical and administrative changes to implement City Council direction.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90149.pdf

MM12.28 - Release of Section 37 Funds for Local Streetscape Improvements to Mill Street, between Parliament Street and Cherry Street - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council increase the 2016 Capital Budget for Transportation Services, subsequent to the adoption of this budget, on a one time basis by $450,000.00 gross, $0 net, (cost centre CTP416-07) in order to undertake streetscape improvements on Mill Street, between Parliament Street and Cherry Street fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from the following developments:

 

a.  neighbourhood streetscape improvements, in the amount of $250,000 (source account XR3026-3700337); and 

 

b.  424-460 Adelaide Street East, secured for local streetscape and and/or parkland improvements at the discretion of the Chief Planner in consultation with the Ward Councillor, in the amount of $200,000 (source account XR3026- 3700710).

Summary

The Motion seeks authorization to amend the 2016 Capital Budget of Transportation Services, subsequent to the adoption of that budget, to include additional Section 37 Planning Act Reserve Funds of $450,000 to finance streetscape improvements on Mill Street, between Parliament Street and Cherry Street.

 

Funds have been secured through Section 37 benefits from the development at 55, 60 Mill St. (390 Cherry St.) for the purpose of neighbourhood streetscape improvements. In addition, funds have been secured through Section 37 benefits from the development at 424-460 Adelaide Street East to be utilized for local streetscape and/or parkland improvements at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor.   The funds have been received by the City from these developments and sufficient monies have not been spent or remain uncommitted to satisfy this Motion.

 

In 2016, the City will undertake watermain work and resurfacing on Mill Street between Parliament Street and Cherry Street. Along with this state of good repair work, a number of additional improvements have been planned to beautify the area and enhance pedestrian and traffic safety. A working group of City staff, representatives of the Distillery District and the Gooderham & Worts Neighbourhood Association developed the design and a public consultation meeting was held on January 19, 2016.

 

The improvements include a new and widened sidewalk on the north side of Mill Street, a realigned traffic signal at Parliament Street, “bump out” expanded sidewalks at intersections for more pedestrian space and to prevent illegal parking, replacement of trees, and decorative pavers at Trinity Street and Parliament Street intersections. These improvements will diminish traffic conflicts and improve pedestrian flow in one of the city’s most vibrant neighbourhoods and tourist destinations.

 

This Motion is urgent as the tender for the Mill Street watermain, resurfacing, and streetscaping project will be issued before the next meeting of City Council and funding must be allocated before then.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90150.pdf
(February 4, 2016) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90284.pdf

MM12.29 - Release of Section 45 Funds from 2263-2287 Yonge Street, 10 Eglinton Avenue East and 25-31 Roehampton Avenue to the Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area for a Streetscape Masterplan - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Christin Carmichael Greb

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Christin Carmichael Greb, recommends that:

 

1. City Council increase the 2016 Operating Budget for Non-Program, subsequent to the adoption of that budget,  by $47,500 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 45 funds obtained in the development at 2263-2287 Yonge Street, 10 Eglinton Avenue East, 25-31 Roehampton Avenue (source account: XR3028-4500167), to provide one-time funding of $47,500 to the Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area to conduct a Streetscape Masterplan for that portion of Yonge Street between Soudan Avenue and the Kay Gardiner Beltline.

 

2. City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area upon the signing of an Undertaking by the Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements, including a requirement that the consultant developing the Streetscape Masterplan consult with staff from Transportation Services, City Planning and Economic Development and Culture.

 

3. City Council direct that the Request for Proposal for the Streetscape Masterplan include a provision that the local Councillor, the South Eglinton Residents' and Ratepayers' Association, the Oriole Park Association and the local community be consulted in its development.

Summary

The Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA) has retained the services of a registered landscape architect to prepare a Streetscape Master Plan.  The objective is to create a streetscape strategy and aesthetic vision for the BIA that is practical, budget conscious and organized into short-term (summer 2016), mid-term (3-5 years) and long-term (5+ years) timeframes. The Midtown Yonge BIA was established in 2014 and the development of a Streetscape Master Plan will result in a more coordinated and cost-effective pursuit of streetscape enhancements in the area.

 

The development of detailed short-term project drawings is included in the terms of the contract.  Short-term projects are those which occur at grade such as benches, planters and other decorative installations not requiring sidewalk removal/reconfiguration and are schedule to be implemented this summer (2016).  Mid-to-long-term projects may include such improvements as pedestrian lighting, flankage yard parkettes and decorative paving treatments.


Funds in the amount of $47,500 have been received through a Section 45 agreement for the development at Section 45 Funds from 2263 to 2287 Yonge Street, 10 Eglinton Avenue East, 25 to 31 Roehampton Avenue.
 

This Motion is urgent to meet the Midtown Yonge BIA’s summer 2016 construction timelines.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90174.pdf

MM12.30 - 839 Ellesmere Road - Request for City Solicitor to Appeal Committee of Adjustment Decision and Attend at the Ontario Municipal Board - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board the Committee of Adjustment decision on Application No. A236/15SC respecting 839 Ellesmere Road.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants, as necessary, to oppose the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in Application No. A236/15SC respecting 839 Ellesmere Road.

Summary

At its hearing on January 21, 2016, the Committee of Adjustment granted Application No. A236/15SC respecting 839 Ellesmere Road for variances for what was stated to be an existing ancillary building that is being used for a workshop and storage purposes.  A copy of the Committee of Adjustment decision is attached.

 

The requested variances do not satisfy the four tests under the Planning Act.  This Motion would direct the City Solicitor to appeal the decision to the Ontario Municipal Board and authorize the City Solicitor to retain an outside consultant in order to oppose the variances at the Hearing.  

 

The last day to appeal the Committee of Adjustment variance Decision is February 10, 2016 and as such this is a time sensitive matter.      

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90185.pdf
Committtee of Adjustment, Scarborough District Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 839 Ellesmere Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90186.pdf

MM12.31 - Requesting Metrolinx not close the York University GO Train Station located at 595-A Canarctic Drive - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request that Metrolinx not close the York University GO Train Station located at 595-A Canarctic Drive and to work with City of Toronto staff to improve access to the GO Station and possibly relocate the Station to Steeles Avenue West.

Summary

Metrolinx has recently advised commuters of its intention to eliminate the York University GO Train Station located at 595-A Canarctic Drive. The York University Station on the GO-Barrie line which first opened in 2002, is an important transit access point for people going to York University and workers in the industrial area where the stop is located.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90206.pdf

MM12.32 - Interim Control By-law affecting lands generally bounded on the west side of Murray Road, north of Wilson Avenue and south of Plewes Road - by Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor David Shiner

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - York Centre
Attention
* This Motion relates to an Interim Control By-law and requires a majority vote to introduce.

Bill 127 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor David, Shiner, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the following recommendations contained in the attached report (February 3, 2016) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning:

1. Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director of the City Planning Division to undertake a study for the lands on the west side of Murray Road between Wilson Avenue and Plewes Road, as identified on Attachment 1 to this report, to review the existing land use permissions and regulations pertaining to the proposed study area and determine if new policies and standards are required to reduce land use conflict, and if so, to bring forward new policies and zoning regulations for the area.

 

2. Pursuant to Section 38 of the Planning Act, City Council enact the Interim Control By-law to prohibit any new Employment and Manufacturing uses described as concrete batching plants, a contractor’s establishment, motor vehicle body repair shop, transportation terminal and plastic product manufacturing use, attached as Attachment #3 to the final report dated February 3, 2016 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, for a period of one year to study the land use permissions contained within the former City of North York Zoning By-law #7625 and City of Toronto Zoning By-law #569-2013, as they apply to the proposed study area.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Interim Control By-law as may be required.

Summary

This Motion is intended to adopt the planning recommendations to enact an Interim Control By-law on the lands generally bounded by the west side of Murray Road, north of Wilson Avenue and south of Plewes Road, to prohibit certain Manufacturing uses for a period of one year.

Background Information

Motion MM12.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90217.pdf
(February 3, 2016) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Murray Road Interim Control By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90218.pdf

MM12.33 - Expression of Interest to Host the 2020 FCM Annual Conference - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Mayor John Tory, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager to submit an expression of interest for Toronto to host the 2020 Annual Conference of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, and to report on the status of the City’s submission, including the financial obligations to Toronto as host city by mid 2016.

Summary

The Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) seeks to identify a host city for its Annual Conference and Trade Show in 2020.  FCM issued a Request for Proposal to host the 2020 Conference in 2015 and did not receive any responses that met their selection criteria. FCM generally seeks to secure a host city five to six years prior to the date of the event.  To date, a host city for 2020 has not been selected. Host cities have been confirmed up to 2019.

 

FCM has communicated that it would welcome Toronto seeking to host in 2020. Toronto last hosted the FCM Conference in 2010.  Given the size of the Conference and the FCM host city requirements approximately 10 cities in Canada have the capacity to host the event, The annual FCM conference brings together elected and non-elected officials from across Canada for a three-day conference and trade show.  The FCM Conference annually attracts approximately 2,000 delegates, 500 companions, over 6000 exhibitor staff (private sector and government departments).

 

FCM maintains overall responsibility for the organization of the Conference.  The host city is responsible for the organization of all social events, study tours and a companions’ program, as well as planning and implementing organizational structures to support the event (including establishing a local organizing committee, designating a host city coordinator, staff and organizing volunteers for various conference-related duties)

 

The cost of undertaking the host city’s responsibilities depend in part on the size of the conference and the activities planned, and does not include the in-kind support that the host city is required to provide, such as staff time.  The total costs to the host city are offset by a per-delegate allocation from FCM, as well as sponsorship revenue.

 

There are many potential benefits to hosting the conference including both direct and indirect economic benefits of a large convention, as well as the opportunity to showcase city programs, facilities and services to other municipal representatives.

 

If the City is interested in hosting, a City Council resolution is required for FCM to give consideration to the City’s candidacy.

 

This Motion is urgent as the City must submit its expression of interest to FCM in time for its Board of Directors meeting in March, 2016.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.33
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90219.pdf

MM12.34 - 591 and 593 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning By-law Amendment, Official Plan Amendment, and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Direction - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Recommendations

Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Jon Burnside, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (February 4, 2016) from the City Solicitor:

 

1.  City Council adopt the Confidential Recommendations to staff in Confidential Attachment 1; and

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the Confidential Recommendations, if adopted, with the balance of the Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential.

Summary

The City Solicitor requires further direction from City Council on the implementation of a settlement reached between an applicant and the City that has been approved in principle by the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This Motion is brought forward on an urgent basis as staff require Council's direction to secure certain matters and allow the development to proceed in a timely fashion.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.34
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90245.pdf
(February 4, 2016) Report from the City Solicitor on 591 and 593 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning By-law Amendment, Official Plan Amendment, and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Direction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90246.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

MM12.35 - 99 Erskine Avenue - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing regarding Application No. A0778/15NY respecting 99 Erskine Avenue in support of City Planning's position as set out in City Planning's report of November 6, 2016.

Summary

At its hearing on November 26, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment refused Application No. A0778/15NY respecting 99 Erskine Avenue for variances to permit the addition of two-storeys to the approved 32-storey building, resulting in a 34-storey residential apartment building.  A copy of the Committee of Adjustment decision is attached.  The applicant has appealed the Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

City Planning by its report of November 6, 2015 recommended to the Committee of Adjustment that the variances be refused.  The intent of the Official Plan and site-specific Zoning By-law to adequately limit shadows on neighbouring open spaces, and preserve the utility of neighbouring parks by minimizing any additional shadowing was achieved through the review and approval of the site-specific Zoning By-law currently in effect, and any additional shadows would not meet that intent.  A copy of the November 6, 2015 City Planning Report is attached.  This Motion would direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the OMB Hearing to support City Planning's position as set out in the November 6, 2016 City Planning report.   

 

The Ontario Municipal Board Hearing is not yet scheduled.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.35
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90250.pdf
Committtee of Adjustment, North York District Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 99 Erskine Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90252.pdf
(November 6, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on 99 Erskine Avenue and 66 Broadway Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90253.pdf

MM12.36 - Requesting Community Consultation on Renaming the Parkette at 45 William Hancox Avenue - by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to investigate the feasibility of renaming the parkette at 45 William Hancox Ave to "Upper Beach Gardens", and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council with a recommendation based on the criteria and process outlined in the Property Naming Policy.

Summary

The Upper Beach Estates Subdivision is one of the youngest neighbourhoods in Toronto. Only 15 years ago the area was a derelict train yard and today it is a thriving community. At the centre of this new community is a large park with no name.

 

Understandably, there is a great deal of confusion in the community about what to call the green space between Brockville Street and William Hancox Avenue. Adding to this confusion, the City also renamed the former Bridgepoint Park to "Bill Hancox Park" creating an apparent duplication of names.

 

In 2014, I initiated a process to empower local residents to select a new name for their park. After an extensive poll of community members, which included an open call for names and nearly 400 votes, residents chose Upper Beach Gardens.

 

This Motion asks Council to authorize staff to undertake the necessary steps outlined in the Property Naming Policy and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council with final recommendations on a name for this important community asset in the Upper Beach.

 

This Motion is urgent because we need to name the park to help Emergency Services with their calls.

Background Information

Member Motion MM12.36
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-90287.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 12

BL12.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact General Bills and Confirming Bills.

 

Consolidated By-law Index for February 3 and 4, 2016 City Council Meeting.

 

Background Information

(February 9, 2016) Consolidated By-law Index for February 3 and 4, 2016 City Council meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-90454.htm
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council