Agenda

- O Canada
- Moment of Silence
- Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on December 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2017.

Deferred Items:

Executive Committee Item EX29.12

Executive Committee Item EX29.23

Community Development and Recreation Committee Item CD24.9

Economic Development Committee Item ED25.3

Economic Development Committee Item ED25.5

Government Management Committee Item GM23.8

Parks and Environment Committee Item PE23.3

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW25.10

Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY23.73

Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY25.40

North York Community Council Item NY26.2

Member Motion MM36.1

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 30 on January 24, 2018

Submitted by Mayor John Tory, Chair

Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 24 on January 22, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 18 on January 4, 2018

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 19 on January 23, 2018

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 25 on January 17, 2018

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 26 on January 18, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 24 on January 11, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 24 on January 18, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, Chair

Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 25 on January 15, 2018

Submitted by Councillor David Shiner, Chair

Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 26 on January 19, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Jaye Robinson, Chair

Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 15 on January 23, 2018

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 27 on January 16, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Chair

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 27 on January 16, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 27 on January 16, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Michelle Holland, Chair

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 29 on January 16, 2018

Submitted by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Chair

New Business and Business Previously Requested submitted by City Officials

Members of Council may file petitions.

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Councillor Neethan Shan has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

"I would like to file an administrative inquiry into a landfill pile on a property at 0 Oasis Boulevard, 3880 McNichol Avenue, in Ward 42.

I would like to know what City of Toronto regulations exist to have this landfill pile removed from the property, and if there are no regulations, I would like an explanation as to why not. 

I look forward to your timely response at the next meeting of City Council."

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council adopt the TO Prosperity 2018 Annual Work Plan for implementation as outlined in Attachment B to the report (November 15, 2017) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, and forward the initiatives with financial impacts to the City Manager for consideration as part of the 2018 Budget process.

2.  City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to work with relevant City divisions and agencies and report back on the development of a City of Toronto Community Benefits Framework that includes:

a.  a comprehensive inventory of existing City processes and practices that leverage community benefits outcomes, including analyses of best practices, challenges, gaps, and opportunities;

b.  ways to maximize community benefits outcomes from large-scale private development proposals, through the enhancement of existing City practices and processes, or the leveraging of untapped opportunities.

3.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Human Resources, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, working in consultation with relevant stakeholders, and contingent on Council approval of resource requirements described in the 2018 operating budget proposal, to pilot-test standards in City contracts and procurement documents related to (i) advance notice of scheduling, and (ii) equitable hiring, and to report back to Executive Committee by the fourth quarter of 2019 on the feasibility of adopting these standards into City contracts and on their impacts for workers, vendors, and City operations.

4.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and the Executive Director, Human Resources, to report to the Employment and Labour Relations Committee on impacts of the Fair Workplaces, Better Jobs Act for the City's employment relationships and labour agreements, within six months of Royal Assent of a new Provincial Act.

5.  City Council convey to the Province its support of the vision, objectives and recommendations of the Income Security: A Roadmap for Change report prepared by the Province's Income Security Reform Working Group, First Nations Income Security Reform Working Group and Urban Indigenous Table on Income Security Reform, and summarized in Attachment E to the report (November 15, 2017) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services.

In 2015, City Council unanimously approved TO Prosperity: Toronto Poverty Reduction Strategy. Designed as a 20-year strategy, TO Prosperity contains 17 recommendations divided in six core areas: housing stability, service access, transit equity, food access, quality jobs and livable incomes, and systemic change. Each recommendation is linked to a set of actions to be carried out over a four-year period. Annual work plans identify initiatives that advance the implementation of actions. Every year, staff report on the completion of ongoing initiatives and present a plan for the following year.

After a brief discussion of new Census and City data on poverty in Toronto, this report provides an overview of key developments in the core areas of the Poverty Reduction Strategy; topics include actions at the federal and provincial levels, progress on the 2017 Work Plan, highlights of the 2018 Work Plan, the first year of the Lived Experience Advisory Group (LEAG), and the launching of an Equity Responsive Budgeting Tool.

The report also examines two emerging processes with significant potential to reduce poverty reduction in Toronto, namely: City policies and programs aimed at leveraging the City's economic powers to drive inclusive economic development; and a report recently submitted to the Provincial government, by three Provincial Working Groups, recommending a 10-year roadmap to structural reform of Ontario's income security system, Income Security: A Roadmap for Change report.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council adopt the revised purpose and the revised Criteria Sheet for the 'Tax Rate Stabilization Reserve' account, as provided in Appendix 1 to the report (November 15, 2017) from the Interim Chief Financial Officer, and amend Schedule 3 of Chapter 227 to reflect the revised purpose.

2.  City Council direct the following accounts, which have zero balances, be closed and deleted from the Schedules to Chapter 227 as set out in the table to follow.

3.  City Council authorize the transfer of the balances of the following pre-2004 Parkland Acquisition/Development Reserve Fund Accounts in column 1 to the corresponding 2004 Parkland Acquisition/Development Reserve Fund accounts in column 2 and direct the accounts in column 1 to be closed and deleted from Schedule 10 of Chapter 227.

4.  City Council authorize the transfer of the balances of the following Donations Reserve Accounts within the Museum Account Group in column 1 to the corresponding Museum - General Account (column 2) within the same Museum Account Group, and direct the accounts in column 1 be closed and deleted from Schedule 5 of Chapter 227.

5.  City Council authorize the necessary amendments to Chapter 227 in accordance with Recommendations 1 to 4 and direct the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bills to give effect to the recommendations of the report (November 15, 2017) from the Interim Chief Financial Officer.

This report seeks Council approval to implement a number of administrative amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds ("Chapter 227").  These amendments include refining the criteria of an existing account and deleting accounts which are no longer required.

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to meet with the Toronto Political Advocacy Committee with the Medical Society at the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Toronto and other interested stakeholders and report to Community Development and Recreation Committee in the first quarter of 2018 on measures to improve tracking information on admission and discharge of homeless individuals in between shelters, respites and hospitals, and the tracking and reporting on in-house healthcare provision.

The health outcomes of the City's homeless population are staggeringly poor, with at least 70 reported people - an average of 1.8 people per week - dying outdoors, in shelters, social service agencies or hospitals in 2017. The Medical Officer of Health has noted that more than half of these deaths were individuals under the age 50 and that underreporting means the true number of people dying due to living with homelessness is likely higher. 

The Toronto Political Advocacy Committee, a group of students at the Medical Society at the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Toronto, have engaged the City to advocate for better data collection and management. The committee suggests that Toronto should adopt a Homeless Management Information System (HMIS), similar to a system adopted in Calgary, Alberta. This HMIS model, the committee argues, allow for shelter staff to better collect data to identify needs, coordinate referrals to other services and provide opportunities for programmatic evaluation of services.

The General Manager of Shelter, Support & Housing has advised that the city's Shelter Management Information System is evolving, with changes being made to better collect data and track individuals who come into and move through the system as a core piece of work that staff are currently engaged in. He has expressed that he would be happy to meet with the Toronto Political Advocacy Committee to discuss their ideas on how to improve the Shelter Management Information System.

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

1.   City Council approve a one-year extension of contribution agreements, excluding 2018 funding allocation commitments which are subject to City Council approval, with the same terms and conditions, with each of the ten Major Cultural Organizations funding recipients: Art Gallery of Ontario; Canada's National Ballet School; Canadian Opera Company; Festival Management Committee [Toronto Caribbean Carnival]; National Ballet of Canada; Pride Toronto; Toronto Artscape Inc.; Toronto Festival of Arts, Culture and Creativity [operates as Luminato]; Toronto International Film Festival; and Toronto Symphony Orchestra; each of the six Local Arts Service Organizations: Arts Etobicoke; East End Arts; Lakeshore Arts; North York Arts; Scarborough Arts; and UrbanArts); and three Specialized Collections Museums: George R. Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art; Design Exchange; and Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto, to expire December 31, 2018.

2.   City Council direct that the contribution agreements be subject to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, the City Solicitor and the Chief Financial Officer.  

3.   City Council direct all funding recipient organizations to continue to submit their annual funding requests through the City's annual operating grants programs.

This report recommends the extension of contribution agreements with cultural grant recipients for a period of one year from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018. All existing contribution agreements with the Major Cultural Organizations, the Local Arts Service Organizations and the Specialized Collections Museums expire December 31, 2017. These contribution agreements provide the terms and conditions of the use of funds. The agreements govern the use of funds in the operating activities of recipient organizations, and ensure public benefit, accountability, and transparency for the City. The actual amounts to be granted in the 2018 budget will still be subject to City Council approval.

City Council direction is sought for a one-year extension from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018, of current contribution agreements with the ten recipients of funding through the Major Cultural Organizations program: Art Gallery of Ontario; Canada's National Ballet School; Canadian Opera Company; Festival Management Committee (Toronto Caribbean Carnival); National Ballet of Canada; Pride Toronto; Toronto Artscape Inc.; Toronto Festival of Arts, Culture and Creativity (operates as Luminato); Toronto International Film Festival; and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra; six Local Arts Service Organizations: Arts Etobicoke, East End Arts, Lakeshore Arts, North York Arts, Scarborough Arts, and UrbanArts; and three Specialized Collections Museums: George R. Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art; Design Exchange; and Museum of Contemporary Art Toronto.

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and other appropriate City Divisions to review the potential for the implementation of a hotel accommodation replacement policy and or strategy to protect the existing amount of hotel space in areas designated Mixed Use Areas and Regeneration Areas in the Official Plan.

A strong and vibrant tourism industry with a sufficient number of hotel rooms and meeting space is essential to the economic health of Toronto. In recent years a number of hotels have been redeveloped into residential condominiums, removing hotel supply from the market at about the same rate as new hotel properties have been coming on stream.

As a result, the number of available hotel rooms in the city of Toronto has stagnated since 2000. At the same time, room supply in the rest of the GTA has grown robustly. A number of factors contribute towards the lack of hotel room growth in Toronto, especially in the downtown area, such as high costs associated with building and operating a new hotel, better ROI for investments in alternative developments, and proliferation of short term rentals.

While the net total hotel room supply has been stagnant in the city of Toronto, tourism has been growing, which is confirmed by the hotel key performance indicators. At the same time hotel employment growth has been slower than the average for the city of Toronto.

The Meetings, Convention and Incentive Travel (MCIT) market segment is by far the most lucrative tourism-related sector. Competition among cities for major conventions is intense. The ability to attract large business events depends on a reliable supply of hotel rooms concentrated in close proximity to one another. The potential impact of a reduced hotel room capacity in certain locations such as in the downtown exacerbates existing issues related to the reduced room blocks being made available. This may affect Toronto's ability to bid for large scale events that bring in significant economic benefits for the city.

The Toronto Official Plan supports the hotel industry by providing short, medium and long term opportunities for hotels and convention space in strategic locations in Toronto and enables the industry to locate, operate, expand, evolve and adapt to its market over time.

Given the net flat growth of hotel developments in the city and the desire to grow the MCIT sector by attracting lucrative conventions and conferences, it is proposed that EDC, City Planning and other partners review the potential for the implementation of a hotel accommodation replacement policy and or strategy to protect the existing supply of hotel space in designated Mixed Use Areas and Regeneration Areas in the Official Plan.

The proposed Downtown Plan policies resulting from the TOcore Secondary Plan study are currently out for public consultation. The proposed Secondary Plan contains policies to strengthen the hotel, tourism, hospitality and convention industries by prioritizing the development of non-residential uses which include hotel facilities in an expanded Financial District and in a new Health Sciences District. Council will be considering the recommended Secondary Plan in the second quarter of 2018.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council receive the report (October 30, 2017) from the Treasurer for information.  

City Council directed staff to report back on the feasibility of requiring companies responding to procurement opportunities for City Businesses to have at least 30 percent gender diversity on their Boards of Directors including providing a jurisdictional review and conducting a public consultation with appropriate stakeholders.

As part of the Social Procurement Policy, the City recognizes that there is a role for the City's procurement process to play in promoting social equity goals, such as enhancing principles of gender equity and increasing business opportunities with the City for other equity-seeking groups such as youth, visible minorities, newcomers, persons with disabilities, LGBTQ2S, and indigenous people.  The Social Procurement Policy, an important component of the Poverty Reduction Strategy, is designed to improve access to procurement opportunities for those businesses that are certified diversely owned.

Staff are not recommending however, the implementation of a requirement that in order to do business with the City, a business would be required to have a board of directors with at least 30 percent gender diversity.  This is based on the following high level summary of reasons:

-  The City should continue to focus on the Social Procurement Policy which promotes access to the procurement process for diversely-owned businesses and is an important part of the Poverty Reduction Strategy versus a policy that creates additional requirements to do business with the City and is only focused on one type of business (corporations);

-  Having a requirement focused on one type of business (corporations) creates an unfairness in the competitive process and may reduce competition;

-  The legislative regime allows private corporations to be set up with only one person on its board of directors and there is no requirement for a private corporation to disclose its board composition;

-  The legislative regime allows public corporations to be set up with at least three people on a board, but does not require the board be made up of a particular composition.  Public corporations under the Ontario Securities Commission are required to provide a written policy relating to the identification and nomination of women directors on Boards or explain why they do not have such a policy. In addition, public corporations are also required to identify targets for appointing women to their Boards as well as explain annual and cumulative progress towards achieving those targets. If a company does not set targets., an explanation is required

-  There is currently no certifying organization that will validate a corporation's board composition.

-  Purchasing and Materials Management Division is in the process of implementing two large business transformation projects to modernize the procurement process to improve efficiency and to allow for more strategic and flexible approaches to procurement.  As a result, there is limited capacity to devote the time and effort required to help educate corporations on a new criterion to comply with gender diversity, to disclose gender diversity on their board, nor to develop the appropriate regime in order to validate whether businesses have met the new requirement.
 

As a result, staff believe it is more beneficial to continue investing the City's limited resources in growing the City's Social Procurement Program as the primary initiative for addressing social equity goals, including measuring and seeking to improve gender equity by increasing opportunities for women owned businesses to bid on City solicitations.

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to expand the Yellow Creek Geomorphic Systems Master Plan Environmental Assessment to include assets beyond geomorphic systems and erosion-impacted infrastructure, as well as a long-term maintenance plan. This must include, at a minimum, an inventory and state of good repair of all existing facilities, including the trail network, an analysis of ecological integrity, and identification of the departments or agencies responsible for implementing and maintaining all planned improvements.

2.  City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, develop the Yellow Creek Geomorphic Systems Master Plan Environmental Assessment in consultation with a working group comprised of relevant community stakeholders and that this working group be formed at the earliest opportunity to inform the Environmental Assessment process for its full duration.

3.  City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, use the Yellow Creek Geomorphic Systems Master Plan Environmental Assessment as a template for future ravine studies and as a costing model for what is required to bring Toronto's entire ravine system into a good state of ecological repair.

The purpose of this report is to respond to the request from the September 9, 2016 Parks and Environment Committee on the feasibility and process to develop a Master Plan for the Yellow Creek and Vale of Avoca area. The Vale of Avoca are the ravine lands surrounding Yellow Creek in Ward 22, St. Paul's and Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale. It is a highly valued parkland space that includes vital infrastructure such as trails, stairs, bridges, sewers and other public facilities normally found in Toronto ravines.

The Ravine Strategy, approved by City Council on October 2, 2017, will guide the management of Toronto's ravine system. Through the application of the Ravine Strategy Prioritization Framework, the City will be able to prioritize areas where protecting ecosystems while managing recreation use and improving access is needed and to start to identify opportunities for collaboration with internal and external partners.

As part of their Council Approved 2017-2026 Capital Budget and Plan, Toronto Water will initiate a Geomorphic Systems Master Plan Environmental Assessment for Yellow Creek. This study will recommend a long-term plan to address erosion and protection of existing critical culvert, sewer, and watermain infrastructure.

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to proceed with Automated Speed Enforcement in conjunction with the Province of Ontario and other partnering municipalities, including the issuance of a Request for Proposals investigating the feasibility for the City of Toronto to manage the Joint Processing Centre on behalf of the partnering municipalities for the future Automated Speed Enforcement program.

2. City Council request:

a.  the Director, Court Services and the City Solicitor to undertake an investigation into the feasibility of adopting an Administrative Penalty System (APS) for both the Red Light Camera program and future Automated Speed Enforcement (ASE) program; and,

b. the City Manager to expedite the development of the business case for IT solutions to advance the development of the Administrative Penalty System for consideration in the 2018 budget process.

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:

1.  Requested the Budget Committee to consider and make recommendations on the funding required to implement the further acceleration and expansion of the Road Safety Plan in 2018, rather than 2019.

2.  Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Directors of the four Toronto school boards, to provide an update annually to the City-School Boards Advisory Committee on progress toward implementing and measuring the impact of the Vision Zero Program of road safety initiatives for school zones.

3.  Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to identify options, resource implications and opportunity for partnership with the Province and the School Boards for expediting implementation of traffic safety measures in school zones as described under the City's Vision Zero Road Safety Plan to public schools, and report back to Public Works and Infrastructure Committee as part of Transportation Services’ bi-annual update report on the Road Safety Plan in the third quarter of 2018.

In July 2016, City Council approved the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan (RSP), a comprehensive, five year (2017-2021) $80.3 million action plan focused on reducing traffic-related fatalities and serious injuries on Toronto's streets. The City is committed to Vision Zero and its fundamental message: “Fatalities and serious injuries on our roads are preventable, and we must strive to reduce traffic-related deaths and injuries to zero”.

The RSP follows a widely accepted, holistic approach to improving road safety which includes engineering, education, enforcement, engagement and technology-based solutions, focusing on six emphasis areas: pedestrians, school children, older adults, cyclists, motorcyclists, and aggressive driving and distraction.

Since its adoption, the RSP has been subject to three accelerations and expansions, totalling $7.669 million:

-   In 2016, a reallocation of $2.293 million to RSP capital funds enabled delivery of the RSP to commence in advance of the 2017 budget through leveraging Public Transit Infrastructure Funding (PTIF) to accelerate pavement marking enhancements and the roll-out of Pedestrian Safety Corridors.

-   In 2017, a reallocation of $4.156 million to RSP capital funds enabled initiation of the "Senior Safety Zones" program, added Motorcycles as an emphasis area, created the "Road Safety Committee", and leveraged PTIF to expand a number of countermeasures, and accelerate the roll-out of Pedestrian Safety Corridors and the "Watch Your Speed" program.

-   For 2018, a proposed reallocation of $1.220 million within the Transportation Services' Capital Budget submission, using funds released from leveraging PTIF that were originally earmarked to partially fund the Geometric Improvements program. This will enable acceleration and expansion of the Enhanced Pavement Markings program, Automated Speed Enforcement program, Mobile "Watch Your Speed" program, and awareness initiatives for school children, older adults, and cyclists.
 

To further accelerate the RSP, in response to requests by Council, this report recommends that an additional $6.303 million in capital funding over the next three years from 2019 to 2021 be considered as part of Transportation Services' future Capital Budget submissions. 

In addition, this report considers the feasibility of accepting donations from the public to provide funding support for local projects and recommends commencing the detailed planning and implementation process for an automated speed enforcement program to operate in school zones and community safety zones.

Staff are planning to report back to Council with a fully revised RSP in the first quarter of 2019 that would revisit the existing countermeasures and proposed new countermeasures for the next 5 year period (2019-2024).

On September 27, 2017 the City School Boards Advisory Committee considered Item TS7.1, a presentation from Transportation Services on Vision Zero Road Safety Plan: Safe School Zones Program.

Etobicoke York Community Council submits this Item to City Council without recommendation.

Etobicoke York Community Council:

1.  Requested the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to determine whether the March 9, 2017 decision of the Ontario Municipal Board implements a zoning amendment that includes Section 37 public benefits in violation of the Board Order of August 27, 2013, and report directly to City Council for its July 4, 2017 meeting.

2.  Requested the Chief Building Official to review and give consideration to revoking the unconditional building permit issued on March 17, 2017, on the basis of error, and that a report on the review be submitted to the September 6, 2017 meeting of the Etobicoke York Community Council.

I am writing to convey my discontent on behalf of my community and myself as the local councillor on the bizarre planning process followed to evaluate the development proposal at the subject site.  Briefly stated, the outcome of the planning process at the subject site is unfair, unreasonable, irrational and unjust.

While there are safeguards in place under the Planning Act and The City of Toronto Act to protect against violation of due process, it appears that the safeguards are surmountable using sophisticated planning.  Sophisticated planning is vulnerable to procedural defects, errors, omissions and greed.  Against this general backdrop and specific circumstances, I have bumped up the final site plan approval to Community Council meeting of June 13, 2017 consistent with the referral of the original application to Community Council meeting of September 10, 2013.

Adherence to procedural rules is a matter of law and the procedural rules must be followed before the merits of the proposal can be heard.  Accordingly, I am concerned that the approval of the condominium registration will nullify the attached outstanding community appeals related to the subject site and deem them redundant and reflective of the disrespect for the involvement of my community under due process.

Additionally, the development proposal at the subject site fails to satisfy two rules or tests.  Essentially, the proposal fails the test of full disclosure under the Planning Act that requires clear communication that is transparent and ensures the appropriate and reliable involvement of impacted members of the public in accordance with the Official Plan.  As well, the proposal fails the test of NO Sec.37 public benefits consistent with the original decision of the OMB issued on Aug. 27, 2013, based on what constitutes a community benefit under the Official Plan.

It is noteworthy that all Provincial Acts applicable to the planning process including the Building Code Act and the Condominium Act must work together to achieve the transparency, accountability and integrity of the planning process.  In that context, I am requesting that Council scrutinize the subject application on draft approval of condominium registration and adopt my recommendations to achieve reasonable and equitable results.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council receive the report (October 16, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, for information.

Etobicoke York Community Council:

1.  Requested the City Solicitor to provide as soon as possible to the Ward Councillor, and to report directly to City Council on November 7, 2017, examples of zoning by-law amendment applications under the Planning Act, other than zoning amendment applications to lift an "H" provision, that proceed to the Ontario Municipal Board on appeal on the basis of delegated authority and without the benefit of a statutory public meeting at Community Council in compliance with the Official Plan, under the Planning Act prior to City Council passing the new Zoning By-law 569-2013.

This report provides an update on the application for Draft Plan of Condominium approval for 2522-2542 Keele Street in response to the September 6, 2017 direction from Etobicoke York Community Council resulting from its consideration of the staff report (August 10, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, headed "2522 – 2542 Keele Street, Draft Plan of Standard Condominium, Status Update" (EY24.4).

North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 14, 2017 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on November 14, 2017.

This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law applicable to the lands at 1 Heathcote Avenue to allow for the construction of a six-unit townhouse block fronting onto Bayview Avenue. The block would be three-storeys in height, have a gross floor area of 1,396 square metres, and floor space index of 1.06 times the lot area.  Vehicular access to the townhouses is proposed from Heathcote Avenue and each townhouse unit would have a rear integral garage. The existing single-detached dwelling would be demolished.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, as it generally consistent with the Bayview Townhouse Design Guidelines.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council endorse the overall Waterfront Transit Network Plan (as shown in Figure 1 to the report (January 10, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B), and direct the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to incorporate the Waterfront Transit Network Plan into the second phase of the Official Plan Review of Transportation and Transit policies.

2.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in partnership with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to report back on the next steps for design and construction, and associated financial implications of the exclusive Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) transit right-of-way extension between the Exhibition Loop and the Dufferin Gate Loop in the second quarter of 2019 or earlier.

3.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in partnership with the Toronto Transit Commission and Waterfront Toronto, to complete a focused feasibility study of light rail and automated funicular technology options for connecting transit below grade between Union Station and Queens Quay, and the extension of light rail along Queens Quay East, and report back on the preferred overall solution, including a refined cost estimate and next steps for design and construction, to the Executive Committee in the second quarter of 2019 or earlier.

4.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in partnership with the Toronto Transit Commission, to extend the scope of the Park Lawn Lake Shore Transportation Master Plan Environmental Assessment currently underway to include and prioritize an exclusive transit right-of-way along Lake Shore Boulevard West, from approximately Legion Road to the Humber Loop.

5.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in partnership with the Toronto Transit Commission, to undertake a review to improve transit operations in the interim at the intersection of Bathurst-Fleet-Lake Shore, including the previously approved closure of westbound Fleet Street to automobiles between Iannuzzi Street and Bathurst Street.

6.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in partnership with the Toronto Transit Commission and Waterfront Toronto, to prepare background studies required for a Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) Environmental Assessment of the realignment and exclusive right-of-way operation of streetcars on Bathurst Street from Fort York Boulevard-Bremner Boulevard to Queens Quay, and on Queens Quay from Bathurst Street to Spadina Avenue.

7.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in partnership with the Toronto Transit Commission,  to undertake a review to improve transit operations for the section of the Toronto Transit Commission streetcar network on Lake Shore Blvd between Long Branch and Legion Road.

8.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in partnership with the Toronto Transit Commission, to prepare background studies required for a Transit Project Assessment Process (TPAP) Environmental Assessment of a new exclusive transit right-of way from Colborne Lodge Drive and The Queensway to Dufferin Street at the Dufferin Gate, as per the preferred route identified in the report dated January 10, 2018 entitled Waterfront Transit Network Plan. 

9.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, continue to consult with St. Joseph's Health Centre and other stakeholders on providing accessible access to the hospital.

10. City Council direct the Acting Chief Financial Officer to include eligible components of the Waterfront Transit project in the City's development charges bylaw review currently underway.

11. City Council direct the City Manager to forward this report to Metrolinx for consideration in the ongoing review of the Regional Transportation Plan for 2041.

This report was prepared in collaboration with the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) and Waterfront Toronto.

The goal of this study was to create a waterfront transit network from Long Branch and Lake Shore in the west to Queen Street and Woodbine Avenue in the east. The results of the study and latest travel demand forecast confirmed the direction of previous initiatives to create an exclusive streetcar right-of-way (LRT) from Legion Road and Lake Shore Boulevard in the west to Leslie Street and Commissioners Street in the east. This direction is consistent with land use projections to 2041 where it was found that the waterfront will outpace most other areas of the City and Region in terms of growth.

In this report, solutions are being advanced for key sections of the network between Humber Bay Shores and Exhibition Place, along Bathurst Street from Fort York Boulevard to Queens Quay, and for the Port Lands from Parliament Street to Leslie Street.

The study has defined the primary east-west waterfront transit corridor as a component of a connected transit and multi-modal system that supports significant growth areas, the greatest concentration of cultural, recreational and special events in the City, and also provides flexibility and network resilience. As a result, a series of streetcar infrastructure projects are recommended that will support a range of route and service options that will allow different future demands to be served.

The two most significant projects in the network are the westerly extension of a new exclusive Light Rail Transit right-of-way from Exhibition Place to serve the Humber Bay Shores area ("Humber Bay Link"), and improving the underground transit link from Union Station to Queens Quay, including the previously approved exclusive LRT right-of-way along Queens Quay East. Without these two components of the network, the benefits of further transit improvements to the west and the east cannot be fully realized. 

The 30% design is already underway for a first phase of the westerly extension of the exclusive transit right-of-way to Humber Bay Shores. This is the section of the network between the Exhibition Loop and the Dufferin Gate Loop, and the next steps are to complete the design and build the infrastructure. This interim extension to the Dufferin Gate Loop has the added benefit of linking the waterfront line to the existing light rail lines on King Street and Queen Street. The initiation of planning for the Humber Bay Link will proceed based on the advancing design of the interim extension.

The underground transit link along Bay Street from Union Station to Queens Quay remains the most critical and challenging section in the network, due to transit ridership volumes, costs and construction challenges. Options have been narrowed down to expanding light rail capacity at Union Station, or repurposing the existing underground link with an automated dual-haul funicular transit system. These two options are recommended for continued feasibility assessment, and thereafter to quickly proceed to detailed design for a preferred solution by the second quarter of 2019 or sooner.

The recommended direction for transit infrastructure improvements across the waterfront network is summarized schematically in Figure 1 below, and will be included in the City's update to the Official Plan in 2018, subject to approval. Services to be operated would be approved by the Toronto Transit Commission Board at a later date, when the infrastructure is ready.

Figure 1: Recommended Waterfront Transit Network Improvements

(See Figure 1 titled Recommended Waterfront Transit Network Improvements

in the Summary Section of the report dated January 10, 2018

from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B)

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council direct the Board of Directors of Toronto Community Housing Corporation to instruct its Chief Executive Officer to work with the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, to initiate a process, satisfactory to the Chief Executive Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, to transfer ownership of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Agency House and Rooming House portfolio to non-profit corporations, ensuring that:

a.  the portfolio is maintained for its current housing purposes;

b.  the portfolio continues to be operated by non-profit corporations;

c.  any transferred asset will revert to the City in the event of any future transfers to a transferee that is not a non-profit or any change in use;

d.  the transaction is structured to support the result of an aggregate net neutral financial impact to Toronto Community Housing Corporation following transfer of the ownership of the entire portfolio;

e.  Toronto Community Housing Corporation Agency Houses, listed in Appendix 1 to the report (January 12, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, are to be offered to interested and qualified existing operators at a value determined by a formula that considers the outstanding mortgage on the entire Agency House portfolio and the assessed value of the individual house; and

f.  Toronto Community Housing Corporation Rooming Houses, listed in Appendix 1 to the report (January 12, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, are to be transferred to qualified and interested operators at a value through a Request for Proposals process based on criteria contained in Appendix 2 to the report (January 12, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A.

2.  City Council acting as Shareholder consent to transfer all properties referenced in Recommendation 1 according to Section 7.3 (e) of the Shareholder Direction.

3.  City Council authorize the General Manager of Shelter Support and Housing Administration (SSHA), to provide, on behalf of the City acting as Service Manager under the Housing Services Act (HSA), consents pursuant to subsection 161 (2) and 162(2) of the Housing Services Act, as required, to transfers by Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and to mortgages by transferees, subject to such terms and conditions that the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration, considers reasonable and necessary to carry out the recommendations adopted by City Council, including, without limitation, compliance with the Housing Services Act and the Service Manager's local rules; rent; the operation of the housing project; funding; reporting and accountability; the mandate and target tenants for the housing project; and tenant supports.

4.  City Council direct the Board of Directors of Toronto Community Housing Corporation to instruct its Chief Executive Officer to work with the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, to  jointly issue a Request for Proposals (RFPs) in 2018 to transfer the remaining scattered housing portfolio, listed in Appendix 1 to the report (January 12, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, including those not addressed in Recommendation 1. Results and recommendations of the Request for Proposals are to be considered by Council along with a full risk and financial assessment of the transfer.

5.  City Council adopt an interim process to appoint tenant representatives to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board for the 2018-2020 Board term, consistent with the current Public Appointments Policy as follows:

a.  Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) to conduct outreach and promotion to TCHC tenants inviting applications for appointment to the Board of Directors;

b.  Toronto Community Housing Corporation and City staff will hold information sessions for tenants interested in appointment to the Board of Directors;

c.  the City Clerk's Office will take in applications and screen candidates for eligibility; and

d.  a selection panel composed of two City staff and one Toronto Community Housing Corporation tenant appointed by the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, will shortlist, interview and recommend candidates to the Corporations Nominating Panel for appointment by City Council including addressing any vacancies as they arise.

6.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Executive Director, Human Resources to consult with the Toronto Community Housing Corporation and labour representatives regarding employment issues, including impacts on pensions, collective agreements, any consideration pursuant to the Employment Standards Act, and other relevant labour and employment statues, with the objective of eliminating labour relations impacts arising from the transfer of Toronto Community Housing Corporation units to the non-profit housing sector.

In July 2017, City Council approved Tenants First: Phase 1 Implementation Plan to restructure the operation, governance and funding of Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC).

This report outlines the next set of recommendations to implement the Phase 1 Implementation Plan.  In the second quarter of 2018 a report on the steps required in the creation of a Seniors Housing and Services Entity will be presented for Council consideration.

Proposed actions are summarized below:

Action 1 - Transfer ownership and operation of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's Agency Houses and Rooming Houses to qualified non-profit housing operators with expertise in providing vulnerable tenants, including people with a history of homelessness, with the supports they need for successful tenancies.

Action 2 - Transfer the balance of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's scattered portfolio to non-profit housing providers, co-ops and community land trusts that are qualified to engage with tenants, improve the condition of the properties and retain the properties as affordable housing in perpetuity.

Action 3 - Ensure effective governance and facilitate ongoing tenant representation by implementing an interim process to appoint Tenant Directors to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board, ensuring a tenant voice in the governance of Toronto Community Housing Corporation.

The recommendations in this report and the steps proposed are designed to improve and transform the delivery of housing and services to the 110,000 residents who live in the City’s diverse housing portfolio. 

At the same time it is recognized and recommended that many of the changes require multi-year planning and implementation.

To be successful in implementing the proposed recommendations it is also essential that there be ongoing active participation from Toronto Community Housing Corporation tenants and staff, City residents, non-profit organizations, City Divisions, as well as other orders of government.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1a.  City Council approve the implementation of a 4 percent tax on the sale of transient accommodations other than short-term rentals (the Municipal Accommodation Tax - Hotel, or "MAT-Hotel"), effective for all such transactions commencing April 1, 2018 and adopt the tax features for the Municipal Accommodation Tax - Hotel as set out in Attachment 1 and 1A to the report (January 10, 2018) from the Interim Chief Financial Officer.

1b.  City Council authorize the appointment of the Greater Toronto Hotel Association as the City's collection agent for the Municipal Accommodation Tax - Hotel, and direct the Interim Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to enter into all related agreements on terms substantially as set out in Attachment 2 to the report (January 10, 2018) from the Interim Chief Financial Officer, and upon such other terms as may be acceptable to the Interim Chief Financial Officer.

2a.  City Council approve the implementation of a 4 percent tax on the sale of transient accommodations in short-term rentals (the Municipal Accommodation Tax - Short-Term Rental, or "MAT-STR"), effective for all such transactions commencing on the date on which the pending short-term rental by-law comes into force (expected to be on or after June 1, 2018), and adopt the tax features as set out in Attachment 1 and 1B to the report (January 10, 2018) from the Interim Chief Financial Officer.

2b.  City Council authorize the appointment of licensed short-term rental companies as the City's collection agents for collection of the Municipal Accommodation Tax - Short-Term Rental in respect of short-term rental operators associated with that company, and direct the Interim Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to enter into all necessary agreements with such companies on terms substantially as set out in Attachment 3 and upon such other terms as may be acceptable to the Interim Chief Financial Officer.

3.  City Council amend the Non Program Revenue and the Office of the Treasurer's 2018 Preliminary Operating Budget to reflect the recommendations in this report resulting from the adoption of the Municipal Accommodation Tax (MAT) such that:

a.  the 2018 Preliminary Non-Program Revenue Budget gross revenue be adjusted to $34.667 million and net revenue of $16.100 million;

b.  the transfer in 2018 of $18.000 million to Tourism Toronto;

c.  the transfer of $0.225 million to the Greater Toronto Hotel Association for the administration of the Municipal Accommodation Tax as the collection agent for the City of Toronto for the hotel industry; and

d.  the recovery of $0.342 million from Non Program to the Office of the Treasurer and increase in the Preliminary 2018 Operating Budget for the Office of the Treasurer by $0.342 million gross and $0 net, and 3.5 new positions for the administration of the Municipal Accommodation Tax.

4.  City Council seek the appropriate Federal legislative or regulatory amendments to exempt the Municipal Accommodation Tax from the Harmonized Sales Tax (HST).

5.  City Council delegate the hearing of any Municipal Accommodation Tax appeals to the Government Management Committee.

6.  The Interim Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the City Solicitor and upon such terms as may be acceptable to him, be directed to enter into an agreement with Tourism Toronto respecting the financial accountability required to ensure that all the Municipal Accommodation Tax amounts paid to Tourism Toronto by the City are used for the exclusive purpose of promoting tourism as required by Ontario Regulation 436/17.

7.  Council direct that the Short-Term Rental by-law to be enacted in accordance with LS23.1, titled 'Licensing and Registration Regulations for Short-Term Rentals', include a provision establishing that all information collected in accordance with that by-law, is collected for the purposes of the administration and enforcement of both that by-law and the Municipal Accommodation Tax - Short-Term Rental by-law, and also a provision requiring that the transaction records that operators are required to maintain and provide to Municipal Licensing and Standards shall include information on the nightly price charged for the applicable short term rental.

8.  The General Manager, Economic Development and Culture be directed to report back by the second quarter of 2019 on a review of the geographical boundary for Regional Tourism Organization 5 (RTO5) respecting municipal contributions to Tourism Toronto.

9.  The City Solicitor be authorized to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to the Municipal Transient Accommodation Tax including: to add the Municipal Accommodation Tax By-law to the City of Toronto Municipal Code as a new Chapter of the Code; to amend the Chapter 27, Council Procedures, of the City's Municipal Code to delegate the hearing of Municipal Accommodation Tax appeals to the Government Management Committee; and to amend the by-law with the Short-Term Rental Operator Registry referred to in Recommendation 7 as required, and the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take necessary actions to give effect thereto.

The Executive Committee requested the Interim Chief Financial Officer to report directly to the City Council meeting on January 31, 2018 on alternative models for the collection of the Municipal Accommodation Tax (Hotel and Short-term Rental Tax).

This report responds to Council's direction to implement a municipal transient accommodation sales tax, at the rate of four percent of hotel accommodation sales, and up to ten percent of short-term residential accommodation sales.

The report recommends that the Municipal Accommodation Tax ("MAT") consist of two components: a sales tax on hotel accommodation ("MAT-Hotel"), and a sales tax on short-term rentals[1] ("MAT-STR").

Staff recommend the implementation of a 4 percent Municipal Accommodation Tax - Hotel and seek all necessary authorities to implement it on all hotel accommodation transactions effective April 1, 2018, including approval of the administrative design features for the tax, enforcement provisions for the tax, and authority to enter into an administration and collection agreement with the Greater Toronto Hotel Association.

The report also recommends that Council adopt the Municipal Accommodation Tax - Short-Term Rentals at the same rate of 4 percent, to be effective on all short term rentals transacted from the date at which the short-term rental bylaw (to be enacted in accordance with Council's decision on LS23.1 titled 'Licensing and Registration Regulations for Short-Term Rentals' on December 5-7, 2017) comes into effect (expected to be on or after June 1, 2018).  In order to facilitate efficient collection of this tax, this report recommends that City staff be authorized to enter into agreements with all licensed short-term rental companies pursuant to which they would assume the role of collecting agent of the tax on behalf of the City in respect of all registered operators associated with the company.

A provision of $16.1 million in net Municipal Accommodation Tax revenue has been set up in Non-Program Revenue of the 2018 Operating Budget. This is the estimated gross tax revenues to the City less costs related to administration and collection and the estimated value of a transfer to Tourism Toronto.

 
[1] The definitions of the terms used in this report, including "short-term rental", "operator", "short-term rental company", and "principal residence" are the same as those in the Short-Term Rental by-law to be enacted in accordance with Council's decision on LS23.1, titled 'Licensing and Registration Regulations for Short-Term Rentals' on December 5-7, 2017.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council adopt the following property tax capping polices, for the 2018 taxation year, to:

a.  limit tax increases for the commercial, industrial, and multi-residential property classes by capping taxes at 10 percent of the preceding year's annualized taxes, through the adoption of subsection 292(1), paragraph 1, of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the 2018 taxation year; and

b.  discontinue the policy of removing properties from the capping and claw-back system once they have reached their full Current Value Assessment-level of taxation, by not adopting section 7.1 of Ontario Regulation 121/07 for the 2018 taxation year, such that the above capping limit applies to the 2018 tax year to any property that has experienced a property tax increase of greater than 10 percent over 2017 annualized taxes, regardless of whether the property had reached its full Current Value Assessment-level of taxation in a prior year;

2.  City Council direct the Interim Chief Financial Officer to review any additional tax options during 2018, including any potential requests for legislative change, for consideration for 2019 and future years.

3.  City Council direct the Interim Chief Financial Officer be directed to report to City Council following Council's approval of the 2018 Operating Budget to approve and enact by by-law the applicable 2018 clawback rates.

This report provides an evaluation of various tax policy options that may be adopted by Council to support small businesses affected by large assessment-related property tax increases, in response to M35.16: Saving Toronto's Small Businesses and Character Streets with Intelligent Tax Reform.

The 2017 province-wide reassessment saw many business properties face significant tax increases. These impacts can be expected to continue in each year from 2018 to 2020 as assessment increases continue to be phased-in over the 4-year reassessment cycle.  Many properties, having reached their full Current Value Assessment-level of taxation in a prior year, were no longer eligible for capping protection against assessment-related tax increases.

It is recommended that, for 2018, Council adopt measures to provide a level of protection against such unmitigated increases, as an interim strategy, while continuing to evaluate other tax policy options over the course of 2018 that will accelerate progress towards full Current Value Assessment taxation, provide targeted tax relief measures for identified or vulnerable groups, and move towards equity in taxation levels. 

Specifically, this report recommends that a tax increase capping limit of 10 percent of a property's prior year's taxes apply in 2018 to any property in the commercial, industrial and multi-residential tax classes that would otherwise experience a property tax increase of greater than 10 percent, regardless of whether the property had reached its full Current Value Assessment-level of taxation in a prior year.  This is a change from prior years, where, pursuant to Council's decisions, capping protection did not apply to properties that had reached their full Current Value Assessment-level of taxation. This measure will ensure that no taxpayer within those tax classes will face an assessment-related tax increase that is greater than 10 percent of last year's property tax liability.

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

1.  City Council repeal the three Community Improvement Plans (CIPs) that currently define the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program and enact a new single Community Improvement Plan by-law to simplify the Program.

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to amend the new Community Improvement Plan by-law to provide greater clarity for applicants and to incorporate the following changes:
 

a.  eliminate office eligibility from the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program within the City's proposed expanded TOcore Financial District boundaries (subject to Recommendation 2e);

b.  maintain and simplify office eligibility outside of the expanded TOcore Financial District boundaries;

c.  maintain incentives for non-office sectors and uses which are currently eligible under the City-wide Community Improvement Plan;

d.  implement a sector-based enhanced grant for Manufacturing, Food and Beverage Wholesaling, Creative Industries, Film Studio Complexes, Convergence Centres and Incubators to equal 70 percent of the municipal tax increment over a ten year period or 77 percent if a combined brownfield incentive is eligible;

e.  amend the criteria for a 'Transformative' Project to be:

1.  minimum investment of $1.5 billion

2.  minimum of 200,000 square metres net new space that will be constructed and occupied within 7 years

3.  creation of a minimum of 3,000 net new jobs to the City of Toronto

4.  be of superior architectural design that includes unique and exceptional attributes

5.  have the ability to act as an anchor within its district and to stimulate collateral new investment

6.  demonstrate a clear need for financial incentives in order for the development to be financially viable, verified by a qualified third-party satisfactory to the Chief Financial Officer of the City

7.  and continue with the following criteria:

a.  meet all the criteria for a standard Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology application

b.  must be approved by Council

c.  applies city-wide

d.  must be linked to regional transit

e.  provide significant amenities that are accessible to the public and will transform the nature of the area
 

f.  include environmental testing costs and costs incurred for remediation within 12 months prior to the submission of an application for the Brownfield Remediation Tax Assistance (BRTA) Program as eligible for assistance.

g.  refine the administrative processes for Commercial and Industrial Condominium applications by eliminating any restrictions on size of condominium units and require approved applicants to engage a third party facilitator to assist in administration and tracking.

h.  amend the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program's eligibility requirements and conditions to:

1.  increase the minimum eligible construction value from $1 million to $5 million;

2.  require all eligible office developments to meet Tier 2 of the Toronto Green Standard;

3.  place a financial incentive cap of $30 million total on individual incentive approvals excluding Transformative Projects and the Brownfield Remediation Tax Assistance portion;

4.  implement an annual Program Administration Fee of thirty cents per square metre based on the eligible Gross Floor Area of each approved development to be deducted from the grant awarded each year for all existing and new projects, beginning in 2019; and

5.  include the replacement of office space at the same location in new mixed use developments to match the parameters of the City's Office Replacement Policy as set out on Official Plan Amendment 231.

3.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back to the Economic Development Committee in the first quarter of 2019 with further analysis and recommendations to improve and enhance the employment requirement under the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program in order to ensure that it achieves maximum benefit for City of Toronto residents.

4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back to the Economic Development Committee in the first quarter of 2019 with the details of an enhanced marketing, promotion and outreach plan for the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program.

5.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to Planning and Growth Management Committee with a recommendation to repeal the existing Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Community Improvement Plan By-laws and to enact a new City-wide Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Community Improvement Plan By-law consistent with Council directions contained in the report (January 16, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and the Acting Chief Financial Officer.

6.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to initiate the next Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program Review with a report back to Executive Committee four years after any Community Improvement Plan amendments from this review come into full force and effect.

The Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology (IMIT) Financial Incentive

Program (the "Program") provides incentives in the form of grants to support the new construction or major renovation of buildings in targeted employment sectors and for certain uses throughout the City. The Program also includes an added grant element for brownfield remediation situations (Brownfield Remediation Tax Assistance or BRTA). The Program provides grants to approved applicants relative to the incremental property taxes that are paid due to new development. Generally speaking, the total grants are equal to 60 percent of the increased municipal property taxes over the first ten years after construction. Thereafter, the City collects the entire municipal property tax. The Program is based on the premise that without the grant, the project would not proceed in the City (the 'but for' clause). The Program has been in place since 2008 and was reviewed first in 2012 with minor changes enacted in 2013 as a result of the review. This is the second review of the Program.

This report provides an overview of the economic and financial impacts of the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program and provides a summary of a review of the Program undertaken in 2017, based largely on the research and advice of Hemson Consulting (the Hemson Report is Addendum A and as an integral part of this Report) as well as public and stakeholder consultations. The Hemson Report was also peer-reviewed by a qualified tax authority.

The Program is implemented under the Province's Planning Act through Community Improvement Programs (CIPs) and these must be amended to alter the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program. The Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program consists of three separate Community Improvement Programs for different geographical areas of the City and with differing qualifying rules. An additional reporting process through Planning and Growth Management Committee and Council will be required to amend the Community Improvement Programs to give effect to these changes. This will be subject to appeal to the appropriate Planning appeal body.

The current grant amounts expended by the City for the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program are reported in detail in the Hemson Report. A total of 31 projects have been approved. These developments are expected to provide 1.1 million square metres of new employment space and support approximately 47,000 new or retained jobs. It is expected that these 31 projects will yield $889 million in new incremental taxes over the 10-12 year payment period while they will be eligible to receive $556 million in grants. On an annual basis, the City can expect to receive an average of $29 million in new net tax revenue from these developments during the grant period. After the grant period ends the City will receive the full property tax on the development. For these approved developments this would be an annual tax receipt for the City of about $79 million. There are 20 other projects for which an Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology application has been received but not yet fully processed. The application process has started for these 20 projects but the applications are not yet approved and significant construction has not yet started.

The Hemson study found that the Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program has been effective in stimulating investment but that market conditions have changed such that it is no longer needed in the Financial District to stimulate office development (with one exception). The Imagination, Manufacturing, Innovation and Technology Program is still a useful economic development tool for office uses outside the Financial District. The Study makes further recommendations to fine-tune certain aspects of the Program.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to submit outstanding short term Capital repair and mitigation projects and longer term capital projects, arising from high lake levels, for priority consideration in the 2019 Capital Budget process.

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to provide an abatement of up to 100 percent of the 2017 base licence fee or rent for tenants or licensees of the City of Toronto, as the case may be, affected by the closure of Toronto Island Park and other waterfront parklands due to high lake levels, to the extent that the General Manager is satisfied that such losses are not covered by insurance and for the portion in excess of any insurance recoveries related to high water levels and closure of the Toronto Island Park and other waterfront parklands, and subject to tenants and licensees having an account with the City of Toronto in good standing.

3.  City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Budget Committee on any changes arising from the expansion of the abatement program.

This report responds to direction from City Council at its meeting of July 4, 5, 6, and 7, 2017 for the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report back to the November 29, 2017 meeting of the Executive Committee with a comprehensive inventory of all operating costs, projected to year-end, associated with the Spring flooding of 2017, as well as recommendations on any proposed rent or licence fee forgiveness for tenants and licensees affected by the rising lake levels.

The net Operating Budget impact associated with the closure of Toronto Island Park is projected to reach a maximum cost of $8.45 million, depending on the total rent and licence fee abatements for tenants and licensees.

Repair and shoreline remediation work is expected to cost $7.38 million, of which $2.0 million can be considered within the 2018 Preliminary Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget. With lake levels still 20 cm above the long term average, staff expect further damage may be seen, particularly at Toronto Island Park, through the winter freeze-thaw cycle.

Staff will provide updated repair estimates for the 2019 Capital Budget process and will report in the third quarter of 2018 on the cost of long-term repair and resilience measures. Preliminary estimates anticipate these long-term measures will cost at least $25 million over 10 years.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  Council direct the Deputy City Manager Internal Corporate Services to further develop a design and plans for Old City Hall that include a Museum of Toronto, a Toronto Public Library branch and wedding chamber with complementary uses such as a museum café and shop, public event space, and institutional uses, consistent with Option 3 as set out in the report (January 9, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services, and the Chief Purchasing Officer.

2.  Council direct the Deputy City Manager Internal Corporate Services to commence necessary work with Avison Young to develop and undertake an Request For Proposal process to seek and secure a Head Lessee for a long-term lease of Old City Hall, to commence once the current lease with the Tenant has expired and report back to Council in second quarter of 2019 with final recommendations for a Head Lessee and strategy for new tenants at Old City Hall.

3.  City Council release the exclusive reservation placed on the courtyard area of Old City Hall for the future use of the Museum of Toronto and to investigate publicly accessible event space within the courtyard and lobby areas as part of a new tenant mix.

4.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager Internal Corporate Services to address the needs of the Ministry of the Attorney General as it relates to any impacts of the building revitalization to their existing lease at Old City Hall.

5.  City Council grant authority to amend contract (Purchase Order #6040924) issued to Avison Young Commercial Real Estate Ontario Inc., in accordance with Section 71‑11.1C of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71 (Financial Control By-law), satisfactory to the City Solicitor, in the additional amount of up to $319,500 (net of all applicable taxes), revising the current contract value from $783,883 to $1,103,383 (net of all applicable taxes), to provide continuing professional services to establish the process to select a Head Lessee and report back to Council on the results of that selection process and to provide a business case for the next phase of work.

6.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services, to negotiate and enter into a contract with CS and P Architects, in the amount of up to $420,000 (net of all applicable taxes) on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, for the development of designs and plans for Old City Hall, consistent with Option 3 as set out in the report (January 9, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services, and the Chief Purchasing Officer.

7.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services to consult with the Art Gallery of Ontario (AGO), Royal Ontario Museum (ROM), National Gallery of Canada, Canadian Museum of History, to identify best practices to make optimal use of all of the available space for a new City of Toronto museum within Old City Hall.

This report responds to City Council direction of November 3 and 4, 2015, for the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services to report back to City Council on the results of a feasibility study for a museum at Old City Hall, public consultations and the design process for the future uses within two years. This report makes recommendations for a strategy for new tenants at Old City Hall, once the provincial and municipal courts vacate the building by December 31, 2021. Any new use or continued long term use of the building will require significant investment in base building upgrades and heritage restoration work.

This report provides recommendations and analysis to support locating the Museum of Toronto, Toronto Public Library branch and wedding chamber, as well as other complementary uses and themes for tenanting the property. Real Estate Services retained CS and P Architects, and Avison Young Commercial Real Estate Ontario Inc. ("Avison Young"), to analyze the market for potential leasing options and to adaptively reuse the property, which has resulted in recommendations for a long-term Head Lessee for tenanting the building.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council approve the preferred site – the current Toronto Transit Commission's (TTC) Danforth Garage, located at 1627 Danforth Avenue – for the location of a new consolidated 54 and 55 Police District facility.

2. City Council reaffirm Guiding Principle 3 of the report (January 10, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services and the Acting Chief Planning, that the Site Selection Process be informed by a community vision;

3.  City Council reaffirm Draft Principle 2 of the report (January 10, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services and the Acting Chief Planning, that a multi-functional site will be created that will be home to various civic and employment-generating uses.

4.  City Council amend Draft Principle 8 of the report (January 10, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services and the Acting Chief Planning to read:

"Principle 8: Appropriately integrate design within the existing neighbourhood context and follow a design intent that ensures the siting and massing of the buildings provide sufficient area and prominence for the public and community uses."

5.  City Council approve the draft principles found in the Comments section of the report (January 10, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended, to guide the future development of the preferred site, and direct the City Planning Division to consult on, and finalize, the draft principles.

6.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to:

a.  Convene an interdivisional working group to undertake a master plan for the site, which will include community consultations, technical studies, confirmation of required Toronto Transit Commission uses to be included on the site, the exploration of other potential partners and uses, and conceptual site plans. The working group will include staff from the following Agencies and Divisions, with additional participants as determined through the master planning process:

1.  City Planning;

2.  Real Estate Services;

3.  Toronto Realty Agency;

4.  Toronto Transit Commission;

5.  Toronto Police Service;

6.  Toronto Public Library;

7.  Economic Development and Culture; and

8.  Affordable Housing Office

b.  Report to the Executive Committee with a progress report on the master planning process, identified redevelopment partners and a phasing strategy in the second quarter of 2018.  The phasing strategy will outline the individual timeline requirements of each partner, including the Toronto Transit Commission and Toronto Police Service, with a plan to meet these timelines.  This includes the commencement of design planning in 2018 and construction in 2019 for a new consolidated 54 and 55 Police District facility; and

c.  Report to the Executive Committee with a business case, including funding strategies in the first quarter of 2019, to include funding plans for site redevelopment in addition to the new consolidated 54 and 55 Police District facility, for which funding is included in the 2018 -2027 Capital Budget and Plan.

d. Establish a Community Stakeholder Group to provide ongoing input into the Master Planning Process.

7.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Executive Committee in the second quarter indicating if future funding requirements will be needed to ensure multi-functions on the site, and reporting as well on the opportunity for a residential hospice in conjunction with the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network (LHIN).

8.  City Council request the Director, Real Estate Services to report to the Executive Committee on the process to determine future uses for current station locations.

The Toronto Police Service (TPS) previously identified their 54 and 55 Divisions as priority buildings for replacement. 54 Division is located at 41 Cranfield Road, and 55 Division is located at 101 Coxwell Avenue. Capital funding for the replacement of 54 Division and renovation of 55 Division has been approved since 2012. The projects were previously deferred by the Toronto Police Services Board (TPSB) to explore opportunities to consolidate the two Divisions. The TPS determined that consolidation was feasible and began the process of exploring potential sites, for which they requested Real Estate Services (RES) assistance.

The Toronto Police Service's Transformational Task Force (TTF), was created with a mandate to 'propose a modernized policing model for the City of Toronto that is innovative, sustainable and affordable'. Their final report 'Action Plan: The Way Forward', reaffirmed the need to consolidate the two Divisions. In addition to aligning with the Transformational Task Force report, the consolidation of 54 and 55 Divisions aligns with the City's real estate goals seeking to co-ordinate, modernize and maximize the value of City assets.

The purpose of this report is to inform City Council of the work done by Real Estate Services, City Planning and the Toronto Police Service, in consultation with other City stakeholders, including local Councillors (Wards 29, 30, 31, 32), the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) and the Toronto Realty Agency (TRA), on the site selection process and to recommend a preferred site for a consolidated police station for 54 and 55 Divisions. Council is asked to approve a set of draft principles to guide the development of the recommended site. These principles were developed by City Planning staff in consultation with the four (4) local councillors, are based on feedback received from the public consultations, and will be further refined in consultation with the local community.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1. City Council approve the Open Data Master Plan set out in Attachment 1 to the report (January 10, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services, and the Chief Information Officer.

2. City Council request the Chief Information Officer, in collaboration with the City Solicitor and the Interim Chief Financial Officer, review the steps required to ensure the publishing of Open Data will protect the City's commercially confidential and proprietary interests and report to the Executive Committee on the approach no later than June 19, 2018.

As directed by City Council at its meeting on April 26, 2017, this report recommends the adoption of an Open Data Master Plan 2018-2022 for the City of Toronto. It also provides an update on the progress of the Open Data program, including the development of a new Open Data Portal.

When government data is made open to the public, new ideas and perspectives unlock the potential for it to be re-used, analyzed, and correlated to help improve the City’s delivery of public services, engagement with citizens in government decision making, and innovation in our approaches to civic problem solving. A stable foundation and substantial investment in open data is a key to the success of strategic initiatives like Smart Cities, Civic Innovation, and Open Government.

Open Data Master Plan

The Open Data Master Plan provides a strategic framework and roadmap for the City to advance Toronto’s vision for open data until 2022. The plan will enable the City to grow as a leader in open data through effective governance, alignment to the International Open Data Charter, open source development and a move to coproduction. It provides visibility into how open data helps meet the needs of Torontonians and how the City plans to unlock its potential. The plan also shows how, and when, the community can best align with the City to leverage open data.

The Open Data Master Plan identifies the resources and digital infrastructure needed to effectively grow and advance the Open Data program. Leveraging current and industry standard technologies that ensure a positive user experience and easy access to quality open data are core to the plan. Increasing the quality, speed and efficiency of open data production is key for creating value through open data, as is showcasing successes and sharing insights. Fundamental to the Open Data Master Plan is building a foundation for enhancing the ability to address civic issues through increased collaboration and partnership.

Four principles guided the creation of the Open Data Master Plan: co-develop with the public; release datasets that help solve civic issues; explore opportunities to improve City efficiency; and embrace inclusivity. These principles were co-developed with the community, supported by Executive Committee and Council through the April 2017 status report, and helped steward the approach to stakeholder consultations.

City staff engaged 125 stakeholders, through 20 meetings in the creation of the Open Data Master Plan. The consultations were inclusive, highly interactive and with long reach. Internal stakeholders (e.g. Chief Transformation Office, Chief Resiliency Office, Civic Innovation Office, Divisions and Agencies), external stakeholders (e.g. Academia, Business, Start-ups, Civic Tech, Province of Ontario) and the Public participated in workshops, meetings, surveys, and webinars. Staff also procured an internationally recognized Canadian not-for-profit organization (OpenNorth) to provide support and coordination services in the external and internal consultation process and documentation of the Open Data Master Plan and Roadmap.

Open Data Program Update

Since 2009, the City has consistently published on average 25 to 30 datasets per year and currently has a total of 258 datasets and over 1,100 datafiles available. 33 new open datasets were published in 2017, alongside 57 updates to current open datasets, and 67 new datasets being prepared for release. The Open Data Master Plan identifies that efficiencies in the publication process will be realized and as such more data will become available with a further emphasis on data quality and relevance to help solve civic issues.

Creation of a New Open Data Portal

The City's first Open Data website was launched in the fall of 2009 and has gone through several iterative improvements. Increased demand for open data and growing expectations for a broader set of functionality, to make open data more accessible to the general public, have necessitated a redesign effort for the current website.

A new Open Data Portal was developed through: Internal, external and public consultation; design thinking and user-centric framework; focus on accessibility and AODA compliance; and socializing initial designs through soft-launches of early prototypes. The new Open Data Portal is expected to launch in Q1 2018 through a phased approach.

The full Open Data Master Plan can be found in Attachment 1.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council approve the Major Terms of a Use Agreement for The Bentway set out in the report (January 9, 2018) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services, which will establish the governing terms and conditions for The Bentway Conservancy's use of City Lands; such agreement to include a Relationship Framework between the City of Toronto and The Bentway Conservancy setting out the roles and responsibilities of the Parties in programming, operating and maintaining the City Lands.

2.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services to negotiate and enter into any and all other agreements necessary to implement the Use Agreement, on terms acceptable to the said Deputy City Managers, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

This report seeks Council endorsement of the major terms of a Use Agreement for The Bentway, which The Bentway Conservancy will program, operate and maintain in partnership with the City of Toronto. The Bentway Conservancy was established as a not-for-profit corporation on September 14, 2016.

This report responds to Council's request for details regarding particular aspects of programming, operations and maintenance, including the need to protect public access to the new open space, the need to foster collaboration between Fort York National Historic Site and the Conservancy, the need to manage sponsor and donor recognition, as well as the need to manage event frequency and intensity in a manner that recognizes adjacent uses.

The exact terms and nature of the partnership between The Bentway Conservancy and the City of Toronto will be defined in a Use Agreement. The Conservancy will have a close working relationship with Fort York National Historic Site, as this first phase of The Bentway is entirely on lands that are part of the National Historic Site. The Use Agreement will therefore include a detailed Relationship Framework between The Conservancy and Fort York National Historic Site. Areas of cooperation include site maintenance, joint programming, event management, fundraising and sponsorship, as well as the need to maintain public access across the National Historic Site.

Announced in December 2015, The Bentway will transform a linear area from approximately Strachan Avenue to Spadina Avenue beneath the elevated Gardiner Expressway into a major civic and cultural asset that will provide much needed public open space and amenities in a rapidly growing area of Toronto. The entire first phase of The Bentway passes through the federally designated Fort York National Historic Site, which is managed through the Museums and Heritage Services section of the Economic Development and Culture Division, with the considerable involvement of The Friends of Fort York and Garrison Common, as well as the Fort York Foundation. Future phases of The Bentway will extend the project to the east.

The Terms of the Use Agreement for The Bentway represent a comprehensive framework that provides the City of Toronto and The Bentway Conservancy with tools for successful collaboration and communication, while also providing The Bentway with the independence needed to leverage additional funding and implement high quality programming, operations and maintenance.

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

1.  City Council request that the Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario provide financial support to host the 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)World Cup in Toronto, including a commitment to cover security costs.

2.  Subject to the City Manager negotiating and executing a Multiparty Agreement or other acceptable arrangement confirming financial support from the federal and/or provincial governments that protects the City's interests, City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute the Bid Agreements for the 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA)World Cup, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager and the Interim Chief Financial Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

The Fédération Internationale de Football Association World Cup is one of, if not the world's premiere international sporting competition. Held every four years, the World Cup is recognized for generating significant economic, cultural and community benefits for its host cities and country, and increasing host cities' profiles on the world stage.

The national soccer associations of Canada, the United States of America and Mexico are leading a joint bid through the United Bid Committee (UBC) to host the 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association World Cup in cities across North America. The 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association World Cup will be the largest held to date, with a record 48 nations contesting the Cup at 80 matches over a 30-day period. Canada would automatically qualify for the tournament by virtue of being a host nation. Based on current discussions, Canada and Mexico would host 10 games each, with the remainder being played in the United States. The only other country bidding to host the Cup is Morocco.

Toronto has been named as one of four Canadian host city candidates, along with Vancouver, Edmonton and Montreal. 28 other candidate cities in Mexico and the United States are also being considered. It is anticipated that Toronto would host 3-5 games if the bid is successful, and if Toronto is selected by United Bid Committee and Fédération Internationale de Football Association as a host city. The host nation(s) for the 2026 World Cup will be named by Fédération Internationale de Football Association in June 2018, and individual host cities will be selected in 2021.

In order to be considered as a host city in United Bid Committee's bid, the City of Toronto is required to enter into a number of irrevocable agreements including Host City, Stadium and other ancillary agreements (the "Bid Agreements"), by February 5, 2018.

The key reasons for the City to participate in the 2026 Fédération Internationale de Football Association World Cup include the substantial economic and global media impacts of the event; the opportunity for community engagement and legacies, drawing on Toronto's unique diversity; the potential to host the event with very limited financial and other risks due to the way the United Bid Committee bid is being organized with no new facilities, infrastructure or operating guarantee being required; and that it builds on Toronto's successful track record of hosting the world at major events, without most of the impacts on residents since there are few games and sites involved.

There is one major unknown at this stage of the bidding process. The Mayor's Advisory Panel on International Hosting Opportunities is clear that the City must confirm the financial support of the federal and provincial governments prior to making a bid for a "mega event" like the Fédération Internationale de Football Association World Cup. This is essential to mitigate financial risks to the City. While the Canadian Soccer Association and City staff have engaged in initial discussions with the federal and provincial governments, a decision or agreement has not yet been reached on financial support. A major component of this financial support is a provision to cover security costs. In the case of this highly visible and prestigious event, the costs for security cannot be accurately predicted at this time and the City has little control over major aspects of the security system. As such, the City should not proceed with entering a bid in which its financial costs for providing security are unknown or uncapped.

Due to the time sensitive nature of the bid opportunity, it is unlikely that a cost-sharing agreement will be reached prior to United Bid Committee's deadline for Toronto to sign the Bid Agreements and still have an opportunity for Council to then approve. Accordingly, this report recommends that the City's signing of the Bid Agreements be made conditional on confirmation of support from the federal and provincial governments, to be secured through a formal Multiparty Agreement or other acceptable arrangement. If a cost-sharing agreement with other orders of government cannot be reached, the City would either submit documents with caveats around financial support or withdraw from the bidding process.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council request the Government of Canada consult with municipal governments and the public before making any ownership changes to Canada's airports, aligned with the request of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

2.  City Council forward the report (January 9, 2018) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to the Government of Canada, the Province of Ontario, the Region of Peel, the City of Mississauga, the Greater Toronto Airports Authority and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

The Government of Canada continues to study potential ownership and governance changes to airports in the National Airports System (NAS), which includes Toronto Lester B. Pearson International Airport. NAS airports are currently owned by the federal government but are operated by local airport authorities which are governed by appropriate regulations including a long-term ground lease. Potential ownership and governance models vary, and each would require unique regulatory and policy regimes to balance the interests of all parties including governments, airport owners, users (airlines and passengers) and the overall public.

To date the Federal Government has not committed to a policy direction related to the ownership and governance of airports in the NAS and any other airport.  It is anticipated that should changes in ownership occur, municipal governments may see impacts in terms of jurisdiction, economic development, infrastructure, community engagement and governance.

Given the uncertain federal policy direction and associated potential outcomes it is recommended that City Council request the Government of Canada consult with municipalities and the public before making any ownership changes to Canada's airports.  This position aligns with the position of the Federation of Canadian Municipalities (FCM) of which the City is a member.

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

1.  City Council approve the updated "Use of City Resources during an Election Period Policy", in Attachment 1 to the report (January 9, 2018) from the City Clerk.

2.  City Council direct the City Manager to implement the "Use of City Resources during an Election Period Policy" at the City.

The recently amended Municipal Election Act, 1996 now requires municipalities to establish rules and procedures for the use of municipal resources during an election period and prohibits municipalities from making a contribution (including money, goods and services) to any candidate, registered third party advertiser or political party.

This report recommends that City Council approve an updated Use of City Resources during an Election Period Policy ("Policy").  City Council approved the original Policy in July 2012, which was implemented for the 2014 general municipal election. 

The Policy has been updated to include registered third party advertisers, realigned for simplicity and readability, and amended to recognize that political activity provisions for public servants are now in effect through Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 192, Public Service.  This Policy applies to municipal (including school board), provincial or federal elections or by-elections, as well as to questions on the ballot.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council amend the Code of Conduct for Members of Local Boards (Restricted Definition) to reflect the changes described in Appendix A to the report (January 10, 2018) from the Integrity Commissioner.

2.  City Council amend the Code of Conduct for Members of Adjudicative Boards to reflect the changes described in Appendix B to the report (January 10, 2018) from the Integrity Commissioner.

When it established the Toronto Investment Board (the "Investment Board"), City Council requested that the Integrity Commissioner review the Code of Conduct for Members of Local Boards (Restricted Definition) to recommend any amendments to reflect the fiduciary duties of the Investment Board.  More recently, City Council also requested that the Integrity Commissioner carry out a similar review relating to the Toronto Realty Agency Board (the "Realty Agency Board").

As a result of these reviews, the Integrity Commissioner recommends changes to strengthen and clarify the Code of Conduct for all local boards, including the Investment Board and the Realty Board.  The changes recommended to the Code of Conduct for Members of Local Boards (Restricted Definition) are indicated in Appendix A to this Report. 

Adjudicative boards are a sub-set of local boards (restricted definition), and are bound by a unique, but similar, code of conduct.  The recommended changes to the Code of Conduct for Members of Local Boards (Restricted Definition) must also be made to the Code of Conduct for Members of Adjudicative Boards.  Accordingly, the changes recommended to the Code of Conduct for Members of Adjudicative Boards are indicated in Appendix B to this Report. 

The Commissioner has additionally written to the Investment Board recommending that it follow best practice for similar boards and establish an appropriate personal trading policy, to further strengthen the duties its board members have not to disclose or use confidential information for private gain.  Personal trading policies range in complexity depending on a number of factors, including the nature and timing of information available to affected people, the nature of the investments or acquisitions made, the terms between third party managers and the board, and the type of investments and transactions over which affected people have influence.

The Investment Board is at the development stage of its mandate, and accordingly this is an opportune time to design a personal trading policy that accurately accounts for its business model and the manner in which it oversees the City of Toronto's investments.  A copy of the Commissioner's letter to the Investment Board is attached as Appendix C to this Report.

The Realty Agency Board is also at the development stage of its mandate.  Different considerations apply given the nature of its mandate; however, it is clear that the Realty Agency Board will have access to commercially sensitive information.  Accordingly, the Commissioner has recommended that the Realty Agency Board consider developing appropriate policies to enhance the confidentiality obligations owed by members of its Board.  A copy of the Commissioner's letter to the Realty Agency Board is attached as Appendix D to this Report. 

As indicated in the letters to the Investment Board and the Realty Agency Board, the Integrity Commissioner will meet with each board to provide more detailed information about what is expected, and will remain available to consult with and provide necessary expertise in support of the development of appropriate policies.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize principal payments of the two City loans, totalling $7,500,000, to YWCA of Greater Toronto from the City's Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR1058) be deferred until June 1, 2034 and interest payments otherwise payable to the City under these two loans be forgiven until June 1, 2034. 
 

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to negotiate, enter into and execute on behalf of the City an Amending Agreement to the Municipal Funding Agreement for 110 Edward Street between YWCA of Greater Toronto and the City, in accordance with the amendments outlined in Recommendation 1 above, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

This report recommends changes to the terms and conditions of two existing City loans made to the YWCA of Greater Toronto (YWCA) from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (CRRF). These loans totalling $7.5M supported the construction of 300 new affordable rental homes for vulnerable women and families, including Indigenous households, at 110 Edward Street, a City-owned property purchased with federal-provincial funds and now leased to the YWCA.

The proposed adjustments to defer principal and interest payments on the City loans until 2034, and to forgive interest payments until June 1, 2034, will alleviate financial pressure on the YWCA created by unanticipated security and electricity costs. By 2034 a loan to the organization from Infrastructure Ontario (in the amount of $5.2 million) will be fully repaid putting the YWCA in a better position to service the City loans.

In September 2017, Executive Committee referred a March 2017 staff report (deferred from the April 2017 Executive Committee meeting) on the proposed loan adjustments to the Acting Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to discuss with the Province potential adjustments to provincial and municipal loans to the YWCA and to report to Executive Committee by the first quarter of 2018.

In December 2017, the Minister of Infrastructure Ontario (IO) wrote to Mayor Tory declining to adjust the repayment terms of its loans to the YWCA citing added costs and inherent risks of a longer repayment period on loans that are in good standing; therefore, this report recommends changes to the City loans with the YWCA.

The Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and Acting Chief Financial Officer have determined that these amendments will support the long-term viability of 110 Edward Street, one of the largest affordable housing developments in Ontario, without unduly compromising the City's financial interests.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council approve the allocation of up to $2 million from the Development Charges Reserve Fund for Subsidized Housing (XR2116) for up to 80 down payment assistance loans of $25,000 to eligible purchasers of housing to be developed on the property currently known as 51 Panorama Court, under the terms of the City's Home Ownership Assistance Program.

2.  City Council authorize the following exemptions for the affordable rental housing to be constructed at 51 Panorama Court that provides additional affordable housing benefits beyond the requirements of Official Plan Policy 3.2.1.9:

1. exemption from the payment of development charges, building, planning and parkland dedication fees and charges; and
2. an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes, for the period of affordability as described in the chart in the Financial Impact section of the report (January 10, 2018) from the Director, Affordable Housing Office.

3.  City Council authorize City staff to cancel or refund any taxes paid after the effective date of the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement.

4.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the City, agreements, and any security, financing or other documents required with the developers chosen for the development of the affordable housing at 51 Panorama Court, Toronto, to secure the financial assistance being provided through the Open Door Program, setting out the terms of the operation of the new affordable rental housing and the delivery of the affordable ownership housing on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Interim Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

5.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to execute, on behalf of the City, the affordable housing agreements, any security or financing documents or any other documents required to facilitate the funding process, including any documents required by the developers, or their related corporations to complete construction and conventional financing, where required.

6.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to execute, postpone, confirm the status of, and discharge any City security documents registered as required by normal business practices.

7.  City Council request that Infrastructure Ontario, in consultation with City Planning, the Affordable Housing Office and the Councillor for Ward 1, host a community information meeting to provide an update on the development of 51 Panorama Court as part of the Provincial Affordable Housing Lands Program.

8.  City Council request the Director, Affordable Housing Office to report to the Affordable Housing Committee in 2019 on the results of both phases of the Provincial Affordable Housing Lands Program in Toronto.

This report recommends that City Council approve proceeding with Phase Two of the Provincial Affordable Housing Lands Program (PAHLP), which will provide up to 160 new affordable rental and up to 80 affordable ownership homes on the Thistletown site to be delivered by non-profit organizations.

The Ontario Government, as part of its Fair Housing Plan, has established a program to leverage provincial land assets to develop a mix of market housing and new, permanent, sustainable and affordable housing across the province. City Council on October 4, 2017 pre-approved Open Door incentives for affordable rental homes in the first phase of the Provincial Affordable Housing Lands Program in the West Don Lands and 27 Grosvenor/26 Grenville Streets.

The second phase of the Provincial Affordable Housing Lands Program includes approximately 11 hectares of developable land, in a 19 hectares parcel, on the former Thistletown Regional Center lands at 51 Panorama Court in the Finch-Kipling area. Infrastructure Ontario on behalf of the Ministry of Housing and Ministry of Infrastructure, through a broker-led process, has issued an offering of this

site to private and not-for-profit organizations to develop approximately 800 market and affordable homes for Torontonians. Up to 70 percent of residential units are planned as market rental and/or ownership housing. A minimum of 20 percent of these homes are required to be provided as affordable rental and a minimum of 10 percent as affordable ownership. 

In proceeding with the Provincial Affordable Housing Lands Program, the Province and the City of Toronto have agreed that there is an interest in approving the financial incentives associated with the affordable components of the Thistletown project. This would also provide certainty for applicants during the provincial land offering. As a result, this report recommends the City pre-approve the Open Door Program's financial incentives to support the construction and operation of the new affordable rental and ownership housing. It also recommends that City staff report to the Affordable Housing Committee in 2019 to provide an update on both phases of the Provincial Affordable Housing Lands Program.

The Open Door Program is a five-year initiative approved by City Council in July 2016. The program is designed to complement federal/provincial affordable housing initiatives and scale up City efforts to achieve Toronto’s targets of creating 5,000 affordable rental homes and 2,000 affordable ownership opportunities for low-and moderate-income residents by 2020.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council request the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to continue due diligence activities and report to the June 19, 2018  Executive Committee on a recommended course of action to secure a long-term viable future for the St. Hilda's Towers Inc. Dufferin and Vaughan Towers and the residents there.

A Member's Motion adopted at the December 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2017 Council meeting requested that the Director, Affordable Housing Office and General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report to Executive Committee on January 24, 2018 on the results of due diligence in developing a plan to modernize the St. Hilda’s Vaughan and the Dufferin Towers.

The Dufferin and Vaughan Towers serve seniors and high needs clients in Ward 15. The two towers contain 314 units and are located at the corner of Dufferin Street and Eglinton Avenue West. A third tower located on the same property is owned by St. Hilda's Towers Lewis Garnsworthy Residence, a related entity to St. Hilda's Towers Inc.

There have been ongoing discussions with the Ministry of Housing and Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network on funding opportunities to undertake the modernization of the Dufferin and Vaughan Towers along with interim funding of $0.25 million from the City and $0.45 million from the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network to allow both towers to continue operations and programs 

The City has retained ERA Architects to conduct due diligence work on the two towers and assist in the development of a modernization plan.

The purpose of this report is to update Council on the results of the due diligence to date and recommends continued work to be undertaken with a future report to the Executive Committee on June 19, 2018 recommending a course of action to secure a long-term viable future for the Dufferin and Vaughan Towers and its residents.

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

1.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to negotiate and execute the municipal capital facility agreement with the owner of the Mirvish Village Redevelopment or its successor corporation, to secure the additional 25 affordable rental homes at or below 80 percent of average market rents for a minimum of 25 years, and any security, financing or other documents required, as well as any amendments thereto setting out the terms of the operation of the new affordable rental housing and the delivery of the affordable housing on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the Acting Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to provide Open Door Program incentives including the relief from the payment of development charges, building, planning and parkland dedication fees and charges to the 25 affordable rental housing units under at the Mirvish Village Redevelopment and work with the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration, on securing Housing Benefits, subject to available funding.

3.  City Council exempt the 25 new affordable homes at the Mirvish Village Redevelopment from taxation for municipal and school purposes for the 25-year term of the municipal capital facility agreement.

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to execute, postpone, confirm the status of and discharge any City security documents registered as required by normal business practices.

5.  City Council authorize staff to cancel or refund any taxes paid from the by-law exempting the property from taxation.

At its meeting of July 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2017, City Council adopted the report "Creating New Affordable Rental Housing at the Mirvish Village Redevelopment" and authorized the Director, Affordable Housing Office to enter into agreements to secure 60 units of affordable rental housing using a combination of federal-provincial funding from the Social Infrastructure Fund/ Investment in Affordable Housing (SIF/IAH) Program, City incentives including relief from planning fees, development charges and municipal taxes, and a Section 37 contribution by the developer, Westbank.

This report recommends City Council approve financial incentives under the Open Door Program to deliver an additional 25 affordable rental homes at the Mirvish Village Redevelopment and provides details on implementation and an update to the affordable housing delivery plan. The Mirvish Village Redevelopment is a large mixed use redevelopment that achieves many local planning objectives, including the provision of affordable rental housing.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to provide funding in the form of a capital grant by way of a forgivable loan in the amount of $8,800,000 from the Social Housing Stabilization Reserve (XQ1106), $1,738,000 from the Section 37 Reserve Fund (XR3026) and $3,700,000 from the Development Charges Reserve Fund (XR2116) to Toronto Community Housing Corporation or a related corporation, to fund the construction activities at 389 Church Street.

2.  City Council authorize that the development at 389 Church Street be exempt from the payment of development charges and be exempt from the payment of planning and parkland dedication fees and building permits under existing City policy.

3.  City Council exempt the new affordable housing units to be developed at 389 Church Street from taxation for municipal and school purposes for the term of the municipal capital facility agreement.

4.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to submit a request to the Ministry of Housing for funding though the Province of Ontario's Home For Good program, in the amount of $17,850,000 to be used by Toronto Community Housing Corporation to pay the construction loan for the development of the affordable housing units at 389 Church Street.

5.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to negotiate, enter into, and execute on behalf of the City, a municipal housing facility agreement  (the City's Contribution Agreement), with Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to secure the financial assistance, being provided and to set out the terms of the development and operation of the new affordable rental housing, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

6.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to execute, on behalf of the City, any security or financing documents or any other documents required to facilitate the funding process, including any documents required by Toronto Community Housing Corporation, a related corporation or the assignee of the municipal capital facility agreement or its mortgagee(s) to complete construction and conventional financing and subsequent refinancing, where and when required during the term of the municipal housing facility agreement.

7.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to execute, on behalf of the City, any postponement, confirmation of status, discharge or consent documents relating to the security given to secure the Contribution Agreement entered into with Toronto Community Housing Corporation, a related corporation, or the assignee of the municipal capital facility agreement, for the construction and operation of affordable rental housing at 389 Church Street, Toronto, as required by normal business practices.

8.  City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to approve the Affordability Payment Schedule and any updates required under the Home for Good program.

9.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to allocate an amount, not to exceed $350,000, of the capital funding, for which authority is being sought in Recommendation 1, to the Fred Victor Centre for relocation costs to be incurred by it as a result of the modernization of 389 Church Street.

10.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, in consultation with Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to issue a competitive proposal call to non-profit housing with supports providers and to select the most qualified proponent to own and operate 389 Church Street, under transfer from Toronto Community Housing Corporation and in accordance with the Home for Good operating funding program guidelines.

11.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the City, an assignment of the municipal capital facility agreement, to be entered into by Toronto Community Housing Corporation to the non-profit selected through the competitive proposal to be issued by the City.

12.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to make the necessary budget adjustments to the Approved 2018 City Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to utilize and spend (net $0) affordable housing funding from the capital and operating allocation from the Home For Good Program, with future year requests subject to Council approval through the annual budget process.

13.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to provide as required such Service Manager consents pursuant to the Housing Services Act (HSA), 2011 as may be necessary to carry out the foregoing recommendations.

This report seeks funding authority for the modernization of an under used building at 389 Church Street ("the Property"), owned by Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) and recommends approval of a combination of City funding, together with capital funding from the Province of Ontario's Home For Good  program.

On December 11, 2017, the TCHC Board approved in principal the modernization and financing requirements to facilitate the transformation of 389 Church Street into self-contained affordable housing and authorized the Chief Executive Officer to execute the necessary agreements to implement the modernization program and transfer the building to a non-profit housing provider.

Operating funding will also be provided annually, once the modernization is complete, from the Home For Good program for comprehensive staff supports and housing subsidies.

The report also seeks authority for the Affordable Housing Office, in consultation with TCHC and Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to issue a request for proposals seeking a qualified non-profit housing provider who, upon completion of the modernization, will own 389 Church Street and operate the 120 affordable rental homes with supports for women. The operator will also assume the TCHC Home for Good loan and be the recipient of the provincial affordability payments.

Approval of the recommendations in this report support the objectives of providing affordable housing, reducing emergency shelter use and reducing the financial pressures impacting TCHC. It also fulfills the commitment to assist 69 former female residents to return to 389 Church Street under the terms of the tenant relocation plan.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1. City Council approve the budget adjustments as outlined in Appendix A of the report (December 11, 2017) from the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to reflect offsetting project deferrals and accelerations and re-allocations in the approved 2017 Toronto Transit Commission Capital Budget to/from future year cash flow commitments (including related funding impacts) noting that there is no impact to project approvals or to City debt.

2. City Council approve 2017 Capital Budget and funding source adjustments outlined in Appendix B of the report (December 11, 2017) from the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, including and increase of $3.6 million in Provincial Funding for Communication Program, an increase of $3.6 million in Metrolinx-Move Ontario for ATC Program ($0.6 million) and PRESTO Project ($2.9 million) and $0.175 million increase in Section 37 Planning Act for Transit Priorities Project, resulting in a total increase to the 2017 project approval of $7.3 million; with no impact to City debt.

At its meeting on Monday, December 11, 2017 the Toronto Transit Commission Board considered the attached report entitled "2017 TTC Capital Budget In-Year Technical Adjustment".

The Board adopted the recommendations in the staff report, as follows:

It is recommended that the Board:

1. Approve the budget adjustments as outlined in Appendix A to reflect offsetting project deferrals and accelerations and re-allocations in the approved 2017 Toronto Transit Commission Capital Budget to/from future year cash flow commitments (including related funding impacts) noting that there is no impact to project approvals or to City debt;

2. Approve 2017 Capital Budget and funding source adjustments outlined in Appendix B including and increase of $3.6 million in Provincial Funding for Communication Program, an increase of $3.6 million in Metrolinx-Move Ontario for ATC Program ($0.6 million) and PRESTO Project ($2.9 million) and $0.175 million increase in Section 37 Planning Act for Transit Priorities Project, resulting in a total increase to the 2017 project approval of $7.3 million; with no impact to City debt;

3. Forward this report to the City of Toronto for Council approval.

The foregoing is submitted to Toronto City Council for approval, through the City's Executive Committee.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council receive the report (November 13, 2017) and Appendices A, B and C from the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission for information.

At its meeting on Monday, December 11, 2017 the Toronto Transit Commission Board considered the attached report entitled, "2016 Diversity and Human Rights Achievements -Update".

The Toronto Transit Commission Board received the report for information and directed that the report be forwarded to City Council, through the Executive Committee, for information.

The foregoing is submitted to Toronto City Council for information, through the City's Executive Committee.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council request the Minister of Education to amend the eligibility requirements for school board child care capital funding to include secondary, non-operating and other school board properties.

The City and the school boards are partnering on a number of city-building initiatives. Areas of ongoing engagement with the school boards include the development approvals process, the provision of spaces for licensed child care and permitting for recreation or other community use purposes. This report provides information to the City-School Boards Advisory Committee on how the City and school boards have improved communications through the Pupil Accommodation Review (PAR) process and how these improvements have advanced the model of schools as community assets.

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1. City Council request the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to include additions and new school construction as part of the site plan approvals protocol for schools.

At its October 25, 2017 meeting, City-School Boards Advisory Committee considered a presentation from the Director of Community Planning on the City-School Boards Site Planning Approvals Process.

 The Executive Committee recommends that:

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Facilities Management, in consultation with the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the President, Toronto Parking Authority, to report to the Executive Committee in the first quarter of 2018 with a plan to implement the Dynamic Symbol of Access for City-owned properties.

2. City Council endorse the Dynamic Symbol of Access and request the Province of Ontario to include the Dynamic Symbol of Access in the Ontario Building Code and Highway Traffic Act to enable the use of the modernized accessibility symbol.

At its meeting of December 4, 2017 the Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee considered a presentation from Jonathan Silver, Co-Founder of the Forward Movement Campaign on the campaign to change from a stationary to a dynamic wheelchair symbol of access. 

The Executive Committee forwards the item to City Council without recommendation.

City Council on December 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2017, referred Administrative Inquiry IA35.1 from Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 14, Parkdale-High Park regarding the cost of preventing information being released at Toronto Hydro and Answer IA35.1a from the City Manager to the Executive Committee for consideration.

The Executive Committee forwards the item to City Council without recommendation.

The Executive Committee requested the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the Acting Executive Director, Corporate Finance to report directly to City Council on January 31, 2018 with information on the Provincial Development Charges Rebate Program and to seek authorization for the City to participate in the Program.

On November 29, 2017, the Government of Ontario announced that the province will rebate up to $125 million in development charges over five years for priority purpose-built rental developments. On December 20, 2017 the Ministry of Housing (MHO) invited Toronto and other eligible municipalities to express their interest in the Development Charges Rebate Program, set to commence in 2018-19. The Program targets municipalities with low vacancy rates, a large tenant population and where affordable rental homes are in short supply.

To qualify to participate in the Program, the City is required by March 2nd to submit City Council's decision designating a program administrator, directing City staff to submit an Expression of Interest to the Ministry of Housing, and authorizing City staff to enter into a Transfer Payment Agreement with the province on the municipality's behalf.

To meet the provincial deadline, I am requesting the Executive Committee add this item to the agenda of the January 24th Executive Committee meeting, and for your support for the following recommendation.

The Board of Health recommends that:

1.  City Council appoint the physician named in Section 1 of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Medical Officer of Health as Associate Medical Officer of Health for the City of Toronto Health Unit.

2.  City Council repeal the By-laws and/or parts thereof appointing former Associate Medical Officers of Health named in Section 2 of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Medical Officer of Health.

3.  City Council forward the report (December 18, 2017) and Confidential Attachment 1 from the Medical Officer of Health to the Ontario Minister of Health and Long-Term Care for approval of the Associate Medical Officer of Health appointment in Recommendation 1 and for information regarding the rescinding of individual Associate Medical Officer of Health appointments in Recommendation 2.

4.  City Council grant authority to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council to appoint the physician named in Section 1 of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Medical Officer of Health as Associate Medical Officer of Health, subject to the approval of the Ontario Minister of Health and Long-Term Care.

5.  City Council grant authority to introduce the necessary Bill in City Council to rescind the appointments of the individuals named in Section 2 of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Medical Officer of Health.

6.  City Council authorize the release of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Medical Officer of Health once adopted.

This report recommends the appointment of a public health physician as Associate Medical Officer of Health (AMOH) for the City of Toronto Health Unit and updates the status of AMOH appointment By-laws.

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Heritage Toronto Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on February 4, 2022, and until successors are appointed:

Peter Berton

Fallon Butler

Liza Chalaidopoulos

Peggy Hornell

Peter Ignazi

Louis Kan

Sean Kheraj

Richard Moorhouse

Aaron Sanderson

Linda Strachan

Karen Whaley

2.   City Council appoint the following candidate to the Heritage Toronto Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018 and until a successor is appointed:

 Kadi Kaljuste

3.   City Council appoint the following candidate to the Heritage Toronto Board as the Toronto Historical Association Representative, at pleasure of Council for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018:

Lisette Mallet

Candidates' Biographies:

Peter Berton

Peter Berton is a Partner at the Ventin Group Architects in Toronto. He graduated in 1979 from Carleton University in Ottawa, and after graduation, worked with Ron Thom, a renowned Canadian architect. Since joining the Ventin Group in 1993, Peter has built a solid reputation for the design of all types of heritage and restoration buildings as well as a wide range of institutional, commercial, and residential projects.

Fallon Butler

A native Torontonian, Fallon Butler has over a decade of experience in the nonprofit sector in the city. Currently the Director of Development for the Miles Nadal JCC, she recently completed a Master’s in Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership at Carleton University. Fallon has had the privilege of working on some of the city’s most significant cultural projects, including the Royal Ontario Museum and Tafelmusik Baroque Orchestra, as well as part of the team to open the new Aga Khan Museum.

Liza Chalaidopoulos

With 12+ years of experience in marketing and communications, and more than ten of those years with Manulife, a leading global financial services company, Liza has carefully cultivated her skills and knowledge to become a seasoned marketing professional. Liza previously held a seat on the AMA Toronto board, and spent two years as Co-Chair of an Employee Resource Group aimed to promote the advancement of women by providing empowering and enriching networking and learning opportunities.

Peggy Hornell

Peggy has had more than 20 year years in the not-for-profit sector.  Her past work experience includes community investment at Loblaw Companies Limited, President's Choice Children's Charity, Toronto Zoo Foundation and Toronto Hospital Foundation. Peggy is a Certified Fundraising Executive and is active in the nonprofit sector; most recently as a Board member of ArtHeart, puppy raiser for National Service Dogs and a member of Toronto Chapter Association of Corporate Grantmakers and AFP Greater.

Peter Ignazi

Peter is one of the most successful creative directors and copywriters in Canada. Under his leadership, Cossette was named Canadian "Agency of the Year" by Strategy Magazine in 2016 and 2017. He was recently named to the “Magnificent List” of top 25 creatives in the world by UK based MarComm News. Peter is the Creative Director behind the hugely successful SickKids “VS” campaign.

Kadi Kaljuste

Kadi Kaljuste has more than 30 years of experience in all facets of communications, ranging from communications strategy development, communications planning, integrated marketing communications, media relations, digital and social media, issues and crisis management, internal communications, and media training. She has volunteered her skills to many charitable organizations over the years, and has served on Heritage Toronto's Marketing Committee for two years.

Louis Kan

Louis Kan is a Chartered Accountant and Certified Fraud Examiner who moved to Toronto from Hong Kong with his family in 1974. His professional experiences include the Chartered Professional Accountants of Ontario, the Legislative Assembly of Ontario, Elections Ontario, and the Office of the Auditor General of Ontario. Louis has served on various community boards, including St. John Ambulance – Toronto Chapter, and is the recipient of the 2015 Government of Canada Don Valley West Volunteer Award.

Sean Kheraj

Sean Kheraj is an Assistant Professor of Canadian and environmental history in the Department of History at York University in Toronto. He is also a co-editor of niche-canada.org where he hosts and produces Nature’s Past: Canadian Environmental History podcast. Sean is the author of the award-winning book, Inventing Stanley Park: An Environmental History, and has also published work on the history of Toronto.

Lisette Mallet

Lisette Mallet is a professional design-illustrator, translator, historian, storyteller, nature interpreter, and project manager. Métis Acadian, she graduated from OCAD with Honours in Communication and Design and has been designing and illustrating ever since, as a scientific illustrator and as a commercial artist for the record industry, publishing, financial institutions, hotels and restaurants. Lisette is currently president of La Société d'histoire de Toronto.

Richard Moorhouse

Richard Moorhouse has more than 35 years of experience in the heritage conservation sector in Ontario. He is the former Executive Director of the Ontario Heritage Trust, and a retired member of the Ontario Association of Architects. Currently, Richard is a member of the Board of Directors at the Willowbank School of Restoration Arts, a Vice-Chair of the National Trust for Canada, and the Past President of the Arts and Letters Club of Toronto. He was awarded the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee Medal for his years of service and significant contributions to the conservation of Ontario’s heritage.

Aaron Sanderson

Aaron Sanderson is an international award-winning fundraising professional with over a decade of experience at leading nonprofit organizations: War Child Canada, SickKids Foundation, BC Children’s Hospital Foundation and Plan International Canada—where he currently serves as Vice-President. He has over eight years of senior volunteer experience with nonprofit boards and committees, including: Habitat for Humanity GTA, the Arthritis Society, Athletics Ontario and University of British Columbia.

Linda Strachan

Linda Strachan brings expertise in marketing, brand management, and consumer research, and work experiences in senior marketing positions in advertising agency and client-side roles. Most recently, she was a Director at the NPD Group, where she provided marketing research and strategic counsel to manufacturers and operators in the food service industry. Linda has volunteered as a Girl Guide leader, a board member for Youth Challenge International, and a Walk Assistant for Heritage Toronto.

Karen Whaley

Karen Whaley was the Marketing Manager at Artscape, where she helped launch two new cultural hubs, Daniels Spectrum and Artscape Youngplace. She worked as a writer and Arts and Culture Editor at Torontoist from 2006-08. Karen has an Honours BA in Art History from the University of Toronto, and has completed the majority of an MA in Art History from York University. She has lived in Cabbagetown for nearly a decade and previously volunteered with the Cabbagetown Regent Park Community Museum. 

The purpose of this report is to recommend the appointment of public members to the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors.

At its meeting on November 7, 8 and 9, 2017, City Council modified the appointment process for Heritage Toronto by authorizing Heritage Toronto staff and the City Clerk to shortlist, interview, and recommend 13 candidates to the Civic Appointments Committee for appointment to the Heritage Toronto Board by City Council.

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council appoint the following candidate to the PortsToronto Board of Directors, at

pleasure of Council, for a term of office commencing April 1, 2018 and ending March 31,

2021, and until a successor is appointed:

Amanda Walton

2.  City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 to the report (January 10, 2018) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to PortsToronto.

Candidate's Biography:

Amanda Walton

Amanda Walton is an independent communications consultant. She is a former Senior Vice President and Partner of a leading Toronto communications and public affairs firm and has more than 25 years of experience in communications strategy and public policy analysis.  A graduate of the University of Toronto with an Honours History degree, Amanda is currently the City of Toronto member of the Board of Ports Toronto, a former Governor of Crescent School and a Past Director of Ontario Place Corp.

The Interview Subcommittee for Toronto Ports Authority will conduct interviews during its

meeting on January 17, 2018 and recommend one candidate to the Civic Appointments

Committee for appointment to the PortsToronto Board of Directors.

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

1. City Council acting as Service Manager under the Housing Services Act, 2011 (HSA), pursuant to subsection 161 (2) of the HSA, provide consent for:

a.  the transfer by Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) of legal title to Part 1 and Part 2 on Plan 66R-29296 to Vivo Residences Inc. (Vivo) as bare trustee on behalf of TCHC and the Allenbury Gardens Revitalization General Partnership (the Partnership);

b.  the transfer by TCHC of the beneficial interest in Part 1 and in part of the below grade portion of Part 2,  Plan 66R-29296 (collectively the "Market Block") to the Partnership;

subject to the following conditions:

i.  TCHC shall reimburse the Service Manager for all provincial housing costs attributable to the Market Block that the Service Manager shall be responsible for pursuant to the Housing Services Act, 2011;

ii.  TCHC shall have advised the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, of the proposed closing date and undertakes to advise the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, of any extension of the closing date or dates for such sale;

iii.  TCHC shall provide the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, with details of the transfers to Vivo and to the Partnership within ten (10) days of closing, including copies of all registered transfers, declarations of trust, trust agreements and the relevant parcel registers, so that the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, may apply to the Province to advise Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation of the sale and removal of the Market Block from the social housing portfolio;

iv.  TCHC shall use the net financial proceeds to fund a portion of the cost of construction for the replacement social housing in Allenbury Gardens Phase 2a; and

v.  such other conditions that the General Manger, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, considers reasonable and necessary to carry out the recommendations adopted by Council.

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to:

a.  advise the Minister of Housing pursuant to section 163 of the Housing Services Act, 2011 (HSA) of the consent provided to the transfer of the Market Block to Vivo and to request that these lands be removed from the social housing portfolio;

b.  provide as required Service Manager consent pursuant to subsection 161 (2) of the HSA on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to any construction financing proposed by or on behalf of Vivo;

c.  provide as required Service Manager consent pursuant to subsection 161 (2) of the HSA on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to future transfers of the Market Block by or on behalf of Vivo pending the removal of the Market Block from the social housing portfolio; and

d.  provide as required Service Manager consent pursuant to subsection 161 (2) of the HSA on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to the re-transfer to Toronto Community Housing Corporation by or on behalf of Vivo of Part 2 and that part of the below grade portion of Part 2 not transferred to the Partnership (collectively the "Retained Lands").

3.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to provide, on behalf of the City, acting as Service Manager under the Housing Service Act, 2011 (HSA), consents pursuant to subsection 161 (2) of the HSA to transfers by Toronto Community Housing Corporation in the future as part of the redevelopment of Allenbury Gardens, consistent with the prior redevelopment decisions by City Council, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) has embarked on a two-phase plan for the revitalization of its Allenbury Gardens community. TCHC is halfway through the revitalization that will replace 127 existing Rent-Geared-to-Income (RGI) units and develop approximately 900 market units. Phase 2 includes 97 of the replacement RGI units, comprised of 28 townhouse units and 69 apartment units, as well as close to 500 market units. TCHC will use the proceeds from the sale of land and market-priced units during the revitalization to help cover the cost of replacement social housing units.

As part of the Phase 2 revitalization, on October 31, 2017, TCHC submitted a request to Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) for consent to transfer lands in connection with the redevelopment. TCHC is proposing that lands identified as Part 1 and Part 2 on Plan 66R-29296 be transferred to Vivo Residences Inc. in order to obtain third party construction financing to commence demolition of the existing buildings and construction of the rental and market housing. The request has no financial implications to the City.

This report recommends that City Council as Service Manager grant consent for the transfer of selected TCHC properties to Vivo Residences Inc. as part of Phase 2 of the Council-approved Allenbury Gardens Revitalization and authorize the General Manager, SSHA, as Service Manager to provide the necessary consents for future transfers associated with the Allenbury Gardens Revitalization.

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council reaffirm the 90 percent shelter occupancy cap in shelters across all sectors.

2.  City Council request the Federal Government to provide ongoing access and support in retaining operation of the Moss Park Armoury as a respite centre until April 15, 2018 at no cost to the City of Toronto.

3.  City Council request the Federal Government to consider the uploading and/or sharing of costs, operations and management of housing and shelter-related services including hotel contracts, for specialized populations which the Government of Canada is currently responsible for such as for asylum seekers, refugees, veterans and Indigenous persons and to ensure that culturally and linguistically appropriate wrap-around community service supports are in place for such residents.

4.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, in consultation with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Acting Chief Financial Officer to: 

a. retain operations of the necessary respite centres, warming centres, and drop-in programs beyond the scheduled April 15, 2018 timeline to respond to the overcrowding in the shelter system;

b. work with the operators of the Out of the Cold programs with the aim of keeping the program running beyond the scheduled April 15, 2018 timeline to respond to the overcrowding in the shelter system;

c. immediately begin preparations for the 2018-2019 Winter season and to consult with all interested parties in these preparations with interested community stakeholders;

d. immediately develop service and maintenance standards for winter respite drop-ins, 24 hour drop-ins, warming centres and the Out of the Cold programs; and

e. ensure necessary budget adjustments are made for 2018 and subsequent years.

5.  City Council request the Ministry of Health and the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network to immediately develop, in consultation with service providers, a comprehensive and funded plan to provide adequate health services, including mental health and harm reduction supports, throughout the shelter system, including within shelters, winter respite centres, warming centres, drop-in centres and Out of the Cold programs.

6.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to implement a third party review of the staff complement at all levels of the Shelter Support and Housing Administration (including management, food staff, cleaners, client services, etc.) and community agencies and programs that provide 24 hour service, with a view to reporting on deficiencies and identifying finances required to resolve them.

7.  City Council direct that the third party review, in Recommendation 6 above, also include an examination of training standards and any upgrades that may be required.

8.  City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to pursue appropriate accommodation and support for refugees and asylum seekers through partner agencies supporting immigrants and refugees, to lessen the reliance on the use of hotels as emergency shelters.

9.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to report on recommendations 2, 3, 4 and 5 to the February 28, 2018 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee.

The Community Development and Recreation Committee:

1.  Requested the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services, to report directly to City Council on discussions with faith organizations regarding opportunities for respite services in local churches which are no longer conducting services.

2.  Requested the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report to the February 28, 2018 Community Development and Recreation Committee meeting on resources and training that can be provided to providers of the Out of the Cold program in handling harm reduction situations, including the disposal of needles and cleaning areas that have been used for injection. 

3.  Requested the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration to make a joint presentation, together with representatives of the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network (LHIN), regarding the shelter operating model, including health services provided through the LHINs, at the February 28, 2018 Community Development and Recreation Committee meeting.

4.  Requested the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, in consultation with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report to the February 28, 2018 meeting of the Committee with the following information:  

a. the need for 1000+ new permanent shelter beds in the system;

b. the number of current permanent shelter beds in the City of Toronto;

c. the number of motel and hotel beds used as shelter beds in the City of Toronto;

d. the number of emergency spaces (mats, cots or chairs), including those at winter respite centres and 24-hour drop-ins, available in the City of Toronto; 

e.  a breakdown of replacement shelter beds versus actual new shelter beds planned for 2018 and 2019;

f.  the number of permanent shelter beds required today in order to meet our 90 percent occupancy target;

g.  the total shelter budget approved in each of the last ten years;

h.  the number of health, mental health, and harm reduction workers employed by the City of Toronto currently working within the shelter system;

i.  the number of frontline health and harm reduction staff funded by the Province of Ontario working with the shelter system;

j.  the number of transitional and supportive housing beds currently funded by the Province of Ontario in the City of Toronto;

k.  the current waiting list for transitional and supportive housing beds in the City of Toronto;

l.  the details of the current Province of Ontario imposed cap on shelter funding for the City of Toronto;

m.  the details of the current Government of Canada funding allocations to support shelter services in Toronto;

n.  a funding and capacity comparison of provincial investments in shelters, including permanent and transitional shelter beds and respite centres, made to Toronto and other Great Toronto Area municipalities, and an evaluation of those investments relative to the numbers of homeless individuals in Toronto and Greater Toronto Area municipalities; and

o.  an analysis of the number of transitional and supportive housing units required to accommodate residents in shelters and on various social housing waiting lists; and further additional strategies to address this sector with numeric goals and policy objectives.

City Officials will provide an update on the status of Winter Respite Services and the additional services activated during the recent cold weather.

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council request Metrolinx to consider designating the 32 metre wide portion of the Finch LRT Maintenance and Storage Facility land fronting Finch Avenue West for community use such as a community hub or centre for the arts.

Over the last 2 years, Metrolinx, local community organizers, and the City have engaged in discussions to reserve the portion of the Finch West LRT Maintenance and Storage Facility (MSF) site that faces Finch Avenue West.

Community groups have expressed they would like to see a community hub or centre for the arts, public realm improvements, and other compatible land uses that would animate the street frontage with at-grade uses and architectural treatment (Community Action Planning Group, 2017).

Metrolinx is currently undergoing a request for proposal (RFP) to award the contract to design, build, finance and maintain the project which includes the MSF site. Specifications include potential future development along the Finch Avenue West frontage. The RFP is expected to close by the end of 2017, with the contract to be awarded in 2018.

The MSF site is located in Black Creek, which is one of 31 Neighbourhood Improvement Areas (NIAs) identified through the City's Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy. According to 2016 Census data, 1 in 3 (33%) Black Creek residents is low income. Almost half (49.2%) of all children under 6 years old lives in a family whose household annual income is less than $44,000 (City of Toronto, 2016 Census Neighbourhood Profiles).

Black Creek is one of a cluster of NIAs in the Jane-Finch community, along with Glenfield-Jane Heights and York University Heights. Residents and local agencies have long identified the need for a community and cultural hub in this neighbourhood. The land at the MSF site provides an excellent opportunity to optimize social, economic and environmental returns in ways that achieve community benefits for the Jane-Finch neighbourhood.

This request aligns with the City's Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy work in the Jane-Finch community. In December 2017, City Council approved measures to advance the work of the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020.

This issue also aligns with the City's current work on a Community Benefits Framework, a poverty reduction initiative that aims to gain community benefits for low-income residents through private and public development opportunities.

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council in accordance with the City's Public Appointments Policy, appoint the following nominee to the Business Improvement Area (BIA) Board of Management set out below at the pleasure of City Council, and for a term expiring at the end of the term of Council or as soon thereafter as successors are appointed:

            Uptown Yonge:

            Cutruzzola, Adriana

2.  City Council remove the following director from the Business Improvement Area (BIA) Board of Management set out below:

            Uptown Yonge:

            Mainolfi, Tony

The purpose of this report is to recommend that City Council appoint one director to, and remove one director from, the Uptown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA) Board of Management.

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:  

1. City Council adopt and certify the 2018 recommended expenditures and levy requirements of the following Business Improvement Areas:

This report brings forward Business Improvement Area (BIA) annual operating budgets for approval by City Council as required by the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  City Council approval is required to permit the City to collect funds through the tax levy on behalf of the BIAs.

Complete budgets and supporting documentation received by December 15, 2017 have been reviewed and are reported here. BIA Operating Budgets received after this date will be brought forward in later reports. Of the 82 established BIAs, 9 BIA budgets were adopted by Council on December 5, 2017 (ED25.7), 52 BIA budgets are submitted for approval in this report, and 1 BIA, Historic Queen East, is inactive.

The recommendations in this report reflect 2018 Operating Budgets approved by the respective BIAs’ Boards of Management and have been reviewed by City staff to ensure BIA budgets reflect Council’s approved policies and practices.

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council designate, based on the poll results respecting the intention to designate the Yonge and St. Clair Business Improvement Area (BIA), the area described by Attachment 1 to the report (January 4, 2018) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the Yonge and St. Clair Business Improvement Area (BIA), under Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment 1 to the report (January 4, 2018) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the Yonge and St. Clair Business Improvement Area (BIA).

3.  City Council approve those amendments necessary to Schedule "A" of the City of Toronto municipal Code, Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, to include the Yonge and St. Clair Business Improvement Area (BIA).

The purpose of this report is to recommend that the area shown in Attachment No. 1 be designated as the Yonge and St. Clair Business Improvement Area (BIA).

In accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, the City Clerk conducted a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to designate the area along Yonge Street bounded by Woodlawn Avenue to the south and Heath Street to the north, and the area along St. Clair Avenue from Avoca Avenue in the east to Avenue Road in the west, as the Yonge and St. Clair BIA.

The City received a sufficient number of ballots to validate the poll and the majority of accepted ballots were in favour of establishing a BIA. Accordingly, it is recommended that City Council pass a by-law to designate the area described in the map in Attachment No. 1 as the Yonge and St. Clair BIA. Subject to Council's approval, this will be the City's eighty-third BIA.

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council designate, based on the poll results respecting the intention to expand the Weston Village Business Improvement Area (BIA), the area described by Attachment 1 to the report (December 12, 2017) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the expanded Weston Village Business Improvement Area (BIA), under Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code;

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment 1 to the report (December 12, 2017) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the expanded Weston Village Business Improvement Area (BIA); and

3.  City Council approve those amendments necessary to Schedule "A" of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, to include the expanded Weston Village Business Improvement Area (BIA).

The purpose of this report is to recommend the expansion of the Weston Village Business Improvement Area (BIA) boundaries as described in Attachment No. 1.

In accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, the City Clerk conducted a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to expand the boundaries of the BIA.

The BIA received sufficient number of ballots to validate the poll and the majority of accepted ballots were in favour of expanding the BIA.  Accordingly, it is recommended that City Council pass a by-law to designate the area described by the map in Attachment No. 1 as the expanded Weston Village BIA.

The Economic Development Committee recommends that: 

1.  City Council request Waterfront Toronto to attend the next Film Board Infrastructure Working Group meeting to discuss parameters of a construction mitigation plan related to building the new river mouth, and flood-proofing the Port Lands, the Gardiner Expressway rebuild and the Coxwell Bypass.

2.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, Waterfront Toronto and the Toronto Realty Agency to report to the February 5, 2018 meeting of the Toronto Film, Television, and Digital Media Board on the requirements for the temporary relocation of the film studio infrastructure located with the new river and the Villiers Precinct.

3.  City Council request both Waterfront Toronto and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to consider the Toronto Film, Television and Digital Media Board to be an official stakeholder on any Port Lands related matters.

The Economic Development Committee:

1. Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to attend the next Film Board Infrastructure Working Group meeting to discuss the Unilever Master Plan and options for including film friendly design in streets, open spaces and buildings.

2. Request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (Waterfront Secretariat) to attend the next Film Board Infrastructure Working Group meeting to discuss parameters of a construction mitigation plan related to building the new river mouth, and flood-proofing the Port Lands, the Gardiner Expressway rebuild and the Coxwell Bypass.

3. Requested that the following reports and updates be submitted to the Toronto Film, Television and Digital Media Board on February 5, 2018:

a. initial results of the Option for Film Studio Infrastructure report by N. Barry Lyon Consultants (NBLC);

b. an update from General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the relocation efforts for the film studio capacity associated with the Unilever Master Plan;

c. an update from General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the start up of operations at Showline.

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

1. City Council receive the report (January 8, 2018) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture for information.

The attached Toronto Economic Bulletin summarizes the most recent data available for key economic indicators benchmarking the city's economic performance.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize the introduction of bills to:

a.  Consolidate, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, all by-law amendments since the last revision and consolidation of the texts of each of the Toronto Civic Employees' Pension Plan, the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan and the pension plan supported by the Metropolitan Toronto Police  Benefit Fund, together with the further amendments described in the body of the report (December 22, 2017) from the Treasurer and the City Solicitor;

b.  Stipulate, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, that the text of each such pension plan as so consolidated is to be interpreted to reflect:

i.  that the new City of Toronto has assumed as of January 1, 1998 all obligations of the former municipality under the plan; and

ii.  the retirement date of the last active member of the plan.

c.  Repeal By-law 380-74 of the former City of Toronto and By-laws 15-92 and 181-81 of the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto currently governing the pension plans.

This report seeks authority to revise and re-enact the texts of the by-laws governing the Civic Employee's Pension Plan (currently  By-law 380-74, as amended, of the former City of Toronto), the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan (currently By-law 15-92, as amended, of the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto) and the Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund (currently By-law 181-81, as amended, of the former Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto), all of which now pertain to pension plans sponsored by the City as a result of the 1998 amalgamation of the City of Toronto.  The revisions will in each case take into account all amendments made since the last revision and re-enactment, correct some clerical errors, delete some provisions which are no longer relevant, and bring the text into harmony with the Plans' current administrative practices.  These re-enactments are a requirement of the Pension Transfer Agreements to be entered into between the City and OMERS for the merger of those Plans into the OMERS Primary Plan, as recently authorized by City Council, and will assist OMERS in implementing the mergers.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:  

1.  City Council approve an extension and amendment of the Professional Services Agreement with Golf Plus Marketing Incorporated (Blanket Contract No. 47020512) respecting the operation and management of the Dentonia Park Golf Course, Don Valley Golf Course, Humber Valley Golf Course, Scarlett Woods Golf Course and the Tam O'Shanter Golf Course for a two year term from December 1, 2017 to November 30, 2019, with an option to extend for a further one year term, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

2.  City Council approve an extension and amendment of the existing food and beverage licence agreement with the Grenadier Group for all five City run golf courses for a two year term from December 1, 2017 to November 30, 2019 with an option to extend for a further one year term, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

The Government Management Committee:

1.  Requested the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, when engaging an external consultant to review City of Toronto golf operations, to:

a.  Include, within the scope of the consultant's study, the development of a profile of current users, including age, residency, frequency and time of play and price demand analysis.

b.  Include, as part of the consultant's study and in the development of any future recommendations, consultations with CUPE Local 416.

c.  Ensure that any non-implemented directions from City Council's decision of November 27, 2012 on "Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division - Review of the Management of the City’s Golf Courses" [Item AU9.8] are addressed in the consultant's study or are included in any future recommendations.

Parks, Forestry and Recreation ("PFR") operates five golf courses and leases out two golf courses.  In the current service delivery model for the five City operated golf courses, golf course assets and turf are maintained by the City; green fees are set by City Council, while ticket sales, golf cart rentals, pro shops, lessons and programs as well as food and beverage operations are contracted out under two separate agreements that were awarded through a Request for Proposal (RFP) process, a model that has been in place since 1993. The two agreements for golf management and food and beverage operations expired on November 30, 2017. Parks, Forestry and Recreation is currently conducting a review of golf course operations to determine a model that will achieve optimal management and quality play for the general public. The results of the review will be reported back in early 2019 with a view to launching an Request for Proposal based on the findings of the review.

This report seeks authority to extend the current Golf Course Management and Food Services contracts for an additional two years with an option for a further one year term at the City's discretion to allow time to complete the above process.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize the grant of easement interests to Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited in relation to the Downsview Park Station lands located at 25 Vitti Street; and the Finch West Station and Bus Terminal lands located at 3965 Keele Street, as further identified in Appendices 1 and 2 to the report (December 20, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services, for nominal consideration and otherwise generally on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendices 1 and 2 to the report (December 20, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services, together with such other or amended terms and conditions as may be satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services.

2.  City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services to approve the grant of easements in favour of Toronto Hydro Corporation or its subsidiaries as long as the City remains a sole-shareholder of Toronto Hydro Corporation, at less than fair market value, and otherwise on terms satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services, at other City-owned properties, where such easement interests are required solely for the purpose of servicing City-owned lands, and are not for the purpose of providing electrical service to other properties.

3.  City Council authorize severally each of the Deputy City Manager, Internal Corporate Services and the Director, Real Estate Services to execute any documents or agreements relating to the transactions identified in Recommendations 1 and 2.

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions identified in Recommendations 1 and 2, including making payment of any necessary expenses, and amending the closing date and other dates to such earlier or later date(s) and on such terms and conditions as the City Solicitor may consider reasonable.

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority to grant easements in favour of Toronto Hydro Corporation or Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited for nominal consideration where such easement is required solely for the purpose of servicing City-owned lands, including easements at the Downsview Park and Finch West Stations Lands.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize the purchase of the property known as 126 Elmcrest Road, Etobicoke from Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure at a purchase price of $1,100,000, plus applicable taxes, registration fees, environmental assessments, appraisals and costs payable to the vendor substantially on the terms outlined in Appendix A to the report (December 20, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services, and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Director of Real Estate Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to execute the Agreement of Purchase and associated agreements and documents on behalf of the City.

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction contemplated in the Agreement of Purchase and Sale and associated agreements and documents on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.

4.  City Council direct the Director, Real Estate Services to develop a strategy pertaining to the acquisition of properties from public agencies wherein an environmental indemnity is required and report to the Government Management Committee no later than April 2018.

5.  City Council direct that the information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 20, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services be made public after the transaction in Recommendation 1 is complete, at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to acquire the 1.25 acre parcel of land municipally known as 126 Elmcrest Road, Etobicoke (the "Property"), located adjacent to Centennial Park, from Her Majesty The Queen in Right of Ontario as represented by the Minister of Infrastructure as represented by Infrastructure Ontario ("IO") for parkland purposes. The subject lands are shown on Appendix B attached hereto.

This report also addresses the environmental indemnity that Infrastructure Ontario (in this and future transactions) and other public agencies now require from purchasers when disposing of properties, which indemnity requires the purchaser to indemnify the subject provincial agency from any costs, claims, liabilities or damages they may arise as a result of the condition of the Property prior to or following the date of closing.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council, as approving authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of the permanent and temporary easement at 500 Dawes Road, as legally described in Appendix A and shown as Parts 1, 2 and 3 on the Draft Expropriation Plan, attached as Appendix B to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services.

2.  City Council authorize the City, as expropriating authority under the Expropriations Act, to take all necessary steps to comply with the Expropriations Act, including but not limited to, the preparation and registration of an Expropriation Plan and service of Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Election as to a Date for Compensation, and Notices of Possession.

3.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services once there has been a final determination of all claims for compensation for the Property to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

In October 2017, City Council authorized the initiation of expropriation proceedings for a permanent and temporary easement at the property municipally known as 500 Dawes Road (the "Property Interests"). The purpose of the permanent easement is for a pedestrian walkway connecting the Cedarcrest Boulevard to the Joshua Cronkwright Parkette and the temporary easement is to allow for the construction of the walkway.

This report seeks approval from City Council, as the approving authority under the Expropriations Act, to expropriate the Property Interests, shown as Parts 1, 2 and 3 on Draft Expropriation Plan in Appendix B.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council, as approving authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of the property interests set out in Appendix A for permanent easements at 685 Lansdowne Avenue, 699 Lansdowne Avenue and 478 St. Clarens Avenue, and shown as Parts 1, 2 and 3, on the draft Reference Plan attached as Appendix B to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services.

2.  City Council authorize the City, as expropriating authority under the Expropriations Act, to take all necessary steps to comply with the Expropriations Act, including but not limited to, the preparation and registration of an Expropriation Plan and service of Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Election on a Date for Compensation and Notices of Possession.

3.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 18, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services once there has been a final determination of all claims for compensation for all the Properties to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

As part of the Easier Access Phase lll Program (the "Project"), the Toronto Transit Commission (the "TTC") is proposing to construct three (3) new elevators at Lansdowne Subway Station that will provide access between street level and the below grade eastbound and westbound subway platforms.  In order to facilitate the Project, permanent easements are required on three private properties.

This report seeks approval from City Council, as the approving authority under the Expropriations Act to expropriate the required permanent easements in, over and through a portion of the properties known municipally as 685 Lansdowne Avenue, 699 Lansdowne Avenue and 478 St. Clarens Avenue.  The required properties are shown as Parts 1, 2 and 3 on the draft Reference Plan attached as Appendix B and on the maps attached as Appendix C.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council approve the expropriation of the 'Right of Way' Easement interest in favour of the property municipally known as 40 Avondale Avenue located over part of 44 Avondale Avenue, being City Owned Lands legally described in Appendix A to the report (December 19, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services.

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, or his designate, to take all steps necessary to comply with the Expropriations Act, including but not limited to, the preparation and registration of an Expropriation Plan and service of the Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Election as to a Date for Compensation, and Notices of Possession for the Property.

3.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services, or his designate, to sign the Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Possession, Offers of Compensation and any other ancillary documents on behalf of the City.

4.  City Council further authorize City staff to obtain an appraisal report to value the Property, updated to the date of expropriation; and to prepare and serve an Offer of Compensation on the registered owner of the Property, at the appraised value, in accordance with the requirements of the Expropriations Act.

5.  City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 19, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services once there has been a final determination and closing of the compensation payable for the Property by arbitration, appeal or settlement, or otherwise to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

This report seeks approval from City Council, as the approving authority under the Expropriations Act, to expropriate the 'Right of Way' Easement interest in favour of the property municipally known as 40 Avondale Avenue located over part of 44 Avondale Avenue, being City Owned Lands.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council, as approving authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of the fee simple interest in 3300 Kingston Road, as legally described in Appendix A and shown as Parts 3, 5, 6, and 7 on Reference Plan 64R-11616, attached as Appendix B to the report (December 19, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services.

2.  City Council authorize the City, as expropriating authority under the Expropriations Act, to take all necessary steps to comply with the Expropriations Act, including but not limited to, the preparation and registration of an Expropriation Plan and service of Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Election as to a Date for Compensation, and Notices of Possession.

3.  City Council grant authority for a court application to be made for an order permitting the City to take early possession of the expropriated Property, if necessary, in order to permit appropriate action to be taken in furtherance of the determined municipal objectives.

4.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 19, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services once there has been a final determination of all claims for compensation for the Property to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

In April 2017, City Council authorized the initiation of expropriation proceedings for the property municipally known as 3300 Kingston Road (the "Property"). If acquired, the Property is to be used for a municipal purpose or multiple purposes, including but not limited to community, social, and/or health services. The intended use will work synergistically with the neighboring property, 3306 Kingston Road, which the City acquired in March 2016 and is repurposing as a shelter for senior men.

This report seeks approval from City Council, as the approving authority under the Expropriations Act, to expropriate the Property, shown as Parts 3, 5, 6, and 7 on Reference Plan 64R-11616 in Appendix B.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize the Director, Real Estate Services to continue negotiations for the acquisition of the property interests listed in Appendix A and displayed on the maps attached as Appendix B to the report (November 28, 2017) from the Director, Real Estate Services, and grant authority to initiate the expropriation process for the Units if the Director of Real Estate Services deems it necessary or appropriate to proceed in that manner.

2.  City Council grant authority to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Units, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for a hearing that are received, to attend the hearing to present the City's position and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for its consideration.

The purpose of this report is to seek authority to commence expropriation proceedings, if necessary, to acquire any remaining residential condominium units at 414 Dawes Road located above an existing library branch.  The Toronto Public Library Board has intentions to construct a new multi-level library facility at the location that will better service the residents in the community once the City of Toronto has acquired all the required residential condominium units and the condominium corporation has dissolved.

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council grant authority to the Chief Information Officer, to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive contract with Uniface BV for professional services to provide emergency support on an as-needed basis to their proprietary Uniface software in the amount of $75,000 net of HST ($76,320 net of HST recoveries) for a period of three (3) years from the date of Award, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one (1) year periods, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Information Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Information and Technology Division is requesting approval from City Council to enter into a non-competitive contract with Uniface BV, for the provision of professional services to provide emergency support on an as-needed basis to their proprietary Uniface software for a three (3) year term from the date of Award, with the option to renew the Contract for two (2) additional one (1) year periods. The total amount of the contract is $75,000 net of HST ($76,320 net of HST recoveries). The Toronto Maintenance Management System (TMMS) is a business-critical system servicing multiple divisions and it operates on the Uniface computing platform.

City Council approval is required in accordance with the Municipal Code By-law Chapter 195-Purchasing, where the current request has exceeded the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five year commitment limit under Article 7, Section 195-7.3(D).

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to establish adequate service levels for the Parks Ambassador Program to meet the increasing City-wide demand and to report back to the Parks and Environment Committee in the first quarter of 2019.

This report responds to the request from the Parks and Environment Committee to report on the service levels of the Parks Ambassador Program, including budget allocations, which would be required to increase service in 2018 and beyond.

The Parks Ambassador Program was introduced in 2003 to proactively provide support and opportunities to vulnerable persons interacting with the City's park system. Through the use of mobile crews, the Parks Ambassador Program connects park users and vulnerable populations with agencies and divisions that are equipped to provide appropriate support. The program also conducts park visits, community night walks and safety audits across the City as needed.

The Parks Ambassador Program does not have a specific service level as approved by Council. The staff and work is included in general service levels of parks operations.

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council direct the Director, Fleet Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, to report to the Parks and Environment Committee at its meeting on February 23, 2018, and prior to the issuance of the next Request for Proposals, with information regarding proposed criteria for any future tender on biodiesel for the City of Toronto's fleet.

In February 2017, the Parks and Environment Committee requested a report on the potential greenhouse gas reductions and costs associated with the City switching to the use of different diesel fuels on appropriate vehicles. Staff were also requested to monitor opportunities to utilize funding expected as part of implementation of Ontario's Climate Change Action Plan.

The existing contract for the procurement of fuel for City fleet vehicles currently has provisions that allow the vendor to increase the supply of bio-diesel or other alternative fuels at the City's request. Currently, as required under Provincial legislation, the diesel fuel provided to the City is 4 percent renewable diesel.

There are a number of options, both short term and long term, for reducing emissions from the City's fleet vehicles. The City, through implementation of the Green Fleet Plan (first adopted in 2004), has been exploring and implementing a range of these options. With the adoption of TransformTO in July 2017 and the target to transition 45 percent of the City-owned fleet to low-carbon vehicles by 2030, the City is looking to accelerate these efforts.

Moving towards increased use of bio-diesel or renewable diesel is one option available to the City, but it is recommended that a thorough evaluation be made of emissions, supply, costs and benefits of bio-diesel and renewable diesel in comparison to other fuel options, such as natural gas and electricity, before moving forward. The City, in partnership with the University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute, is currently conducting this analysis. Staff will report the results to City Council following its completion and will make recommendations for action as part to the ongoing review and updates to the City's Green Fleet Plan.

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council request the Federal Department of Environment and Climate Change and the Federal Department of Natural Resources to consider the Toronto Islands for designation as a Bird Sanctuary, under the Migratory Birds Act, and the enacting of appropriate regulations for the protection arising from such a designation.

City Council, on November 7, 8, and 9, 2017, referred Motion MM34.13 to the Parks and Environment Committee.

The Toronto Islands are a jewel in the heart of Canada's largest metropolis. In addition to being home to hundreds of residents, they represent a significant destination for residents and visitors from across our City, providing a way to enjoy and respect the natural environment, mere minutes from downtown. The Toronto Islands are a sanctuary for all of us.

By their very nature, they also create a significant natural habitat for many plant and animal species. Many areas of the Islands have been designated Areas of Natural and Scientific Interest by the Ministry of Natural Resources, demonstrating their high value for conservation, study, and education. Portions of Muggs Island, Hanlan's Beach, and Centre Island are also designated as Environmentally Significant Areas by the Ministry, a designation for areas of particular significance and sensitivity, and which require additional protection to preserve their environmental qualities and significance.

The Islands' location immediately adjacent to the biggest metropolis in Canada inherently creates a danger to the species that rely on this habitat for survival. We saw first-hand this past year that the climate change crisis has already begun affecting the Islands, when flooding not only closed them to the public, but endangered the habitat of their plant and animal species. In 2013, the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority remarked in a letter to Toronto and East York Community Council that the Island wetlands provide feeding areas for colonial bird species, waterfowl, and rare migrants as they move through the urban environment, as well as important foraging area for many of the significant species nesting at Tommy Thompson Park, and foraging and resting for hundreds of migrating bird species.

An area can be designated as a Migratory Bird Sanctuary, under the Federal Migratory Birds Convention Act. The Act allows for regulations for the protection of migratory birds, to prohibit the taking, injuring, destruction, or the molestation of their (migratory birds) nests or eggs, within any prescribed area, and for the control and management of such area. That provision forms the basis for establishing sanctuaries for migratory birds and for enacting regulations to control and administer such sanctuaries.

Given the significance of the ecosystem to the natural and migratory bird population, but also the clear dangers to the bird species native to and migrating to and from the Islands, a review for designation as a Bird Sanctuary for the Toronto Islands is a critical step in protecting this habitat.

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

1. City Council approve the application to amend the Sign By-law to add a site-specific amendment to Schedule 'B' of Chapter 694, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments, to establish regulations for the premises municipally known as 440 Front Street West, described in Attachment 1 to the report (December 28, 2017) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building (Interim); and,

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendation, subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft by-law as may be required.

This report recommends approval of a Site-Specific Amendment to the Sign By-law for the property at 440 Front Street West, at the north-west corner of Front Street and Spadina Avenue (the former Globe and Mail site).

The property is the subject of a development application which consists of seven mixed-use buildings and associated underground parking. The consortium of developers who are involved in the project refer to the development as ‘The Well’.  

In December 2016, as a result of the re-development of the site, Toronto Building received an application to amend the Sign By-law to permit a combination of first party wall, ground, projecting and overhanging structure signs and third party electronic signs along Front Street and Spadina Avenue. Through consultations with City Planning and Transportation Services, Toronto Building established a number of objectives to review against the applicant's proposals. The recommended site-specific amendment is consistent with these objectives and the intent of the Sign By-law. 

This report also responds to a direction from the Planning and Growth Management Committee ("PGM") to review the sign regulations for the area surrounding the intersection of Front Street and Spadina Avenue, and identify any potential amendments to the Sign By-law to accommodate present and future developments, including the creation of a Special Sign District.

This report has been prepared in consultation with staff from City Planning and Transportation Services.

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council approve Eco-Roof Incentive Program funding for a green roof at 77  Glen Rush Boulevard of 1,073 square metres, in an amount up to $7,300 above the pre-approved funding of $100,000.

Green roofs and cool roofs – known collectively as 'eco-roofs' – help make Toronto more resilient and better adapted to climate change. Eco-roofs reduce urban heat and its associated energy use. Green roofs also help manage storm water runoff, enhance biodiversity, improve air quality, and beautify our city. In 2008, Toronto established the Eco-Roof Incentive Program, which encourages the installation of eco-roofs on existing buildings and some new buildings. In 2013, the program became completely self‑sustaining drawing funding from cash-in-lieu payments through the Green Roof Bylaw.

In December 2016, a new reporting requirement was adopted by City Council, stating that a staff report be submitted with a recommendation to the Planning and Growth Management Committee and City Council for applications for project funding greater than $50,000 for cool roofs and $100,000 for green roofs. At the same time, City Council amended the terms and conditions of the program to allow all new construction projects by organizations incorporated as not-for-profit corporations, to be made eligible for green roof incentives provided by the City regardless of size.

This report responds to the reporting requirement for a green roof project greater than $100,000 at a new building located at 77 Glen Rush Boulevard. A green roof is proposed on the new Caribou Torah Education Centre by the Caribou Torah Education Foundation, which is a not-for-profit corporation with registered charity status. Program staff have reviewed the application and have determined that the proposed green roof meets program eligibility criteria and therefore is recommended for funding.

This project is eligible for funding in the amount of $107,300, based on the proposed green roof size of 1,073 m2 and the green roof incentive of $100 per square metre (m2). Pre-approval of $100,000 has been provided with the authority delegated to staff when the Eco-Roof Incentive Program was adopted in 2008 (Part 3 of Council Decision PG20.8). This report seeks approval to provide additional funding in the amount of $7,300 for a total of $107,300 to support the full size of the proposed green roof.

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

1. City Council adopt the proposed City Planning strategy for scheduling of outstanding Heritage Conservation District Studies set out in the report (November 30, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

2. City Council direct that Heritage Conservation District studies be initiated for Beaconsfield, Belmont-Hillsboro, Harbord Village Phase 3, Lawrence Park West, St. Lawrence Phase 2: Esplanade, Sunshine Valley, The Junction Phase 1, West Annex Phase 2 and Weston Area Phase 2 study areas as shown in Attachment 1 to the report (November 30, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

3. City Council direct that four Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment Studies be initiated for the Agincourt, Leaside, Liberty Village and Summerhill study areas shown in Attachment 2 to the report (November 30, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

4. City Council request the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to forecast and report  yearly on the initiation and delivery of Heritage Conservation District Studies and associated Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment Studies in the City Planning Study Work Program to the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

5. City Council direct that the boundary of the Heritage Conservation District for The Junction Phase 1, be expanded westward to Gilmour Avenue.

6. City Council direct that the boundary of the Heritage Conservation District for The Harbord Village Phase III, be expanded south of Ulster Street south to College Street on Major Street and the west side Lippincott Street north of King Edward School.

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

1.   Requested the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to review the proposed expanded area bound by Elm Street, Springmount Avenue, Macdonald Avenue, Pine Street and Church Street prior to commencing the Weston Phase 2 Heritage Conservation District Study and bring forward a study authorization report to revise the boundary should the area merit study as a heritage conservation district, no later than the first quarter of 2019.

2.  Requested the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report directly to City Council on means to advance the multi-year heritage work program including consideration of retaining a temporary project manager in 2018 utilizing funding from the City Planning capital budget.

The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning gave a presentation on Overview of City of Toronto's Heritage Tool Kit.

This report makes recommendations for the prioritization for the thirteen outstanding Heritage Conservation District studies, with reference to authorization dates, and will recommend interim protective measures that will be undertaken while authorized areas await study. This report is in response to a request from the Planning and Growth Management Committee (April 5, 2017) concerning the Division's Update on Heritage Studies.

This report was developed in accordance with the Council-adopted Heritage Conservation Districts in Toronto: Procedures, Policies and Terms of Reference (2012).

The Toronto Preservation Board on December 14, 2017 considered a report (November 30, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Prioritization of Outstanding Heritage Conservation District Studies and Interim Protective Measures.

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council express their appreciation to the Province with regard to advancing the changes to the Planning Act.

2.  City Council advise the Province that, if Bill139 is not proclaimed into force until April of 2018, then there could be potentially 380 privately-initiated developments in the City of Toronto, representing 130,000 residential units, including many affordable housing units, that could be appealed for adjudication under the current system, and that as a result of the delay in the passing of Bill 139 into law coupled with the proposed regulations, there will likely be significant delays in delivering a significant portion of these housing units in the City of Toronto. 

3.  City Council request that the Province proclaim Bill 139, Building Better Communities and Conserving Watersheds Act, 2017 to be in force at the earliest possible date.

4.  City Council request the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) to prioritize the disposition of municipally initiated official plan and zoning by-law amendments still subject to the existing Planning Act regime.

5.  City Council forward the report (January 10, 2018) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and the Attorney General for their information.

This report comments and provides recommendations for Council's consideration on the proposed transition regulation associated with Bill 139, the Building Better Communities and Conserving Watersheds Act, 2017, which was given Royal Assent on December 12, 2017 and which is expected to be proclaimed in the first quarter of this year.

The Planning and Growth Management Committee submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

1.  Requested the Chair to call a special meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee on this matter prior to the City Council meeting scheduled for January 31, 2018.

2.  Requested that, in the event that the Planning and Growth Management Committee is unable to meet prior to January 31, 2018, the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning report directly to City Council with a proposed response from the City of Toronto on the provincial proposal on Inclusionary Zoning legislation.

3. Requested City staff to continue discussions with the Province on changes to the draft regulations to address the City of Toronto's concerns.

The Ontario government has announced details of Inclusionary Zoning legislation that would give municipalities the ability to secure affordable housing in new residential developments through the use of inclusionary zoning. The deadline to submit comments on this proposed legislation is February 1, 2018.

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in the first quarter of 2019 with specific recommendations and a detailed and comprehensive Automated Vehicle Tactical Plan. 

2.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to explore opportunities to enhance partnerships with other levels of government including other municipalities in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area, province of Ontario, and across Canada to share strategies and develop best practices. 

3.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to explore opportunities to collaborate with Sidewalk Labs in the process to develop policy and infrastructure related to Automated Vehicles (AVs).

4.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to pursue formal membership in the Municipal Alliance for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Ontario (MACAVO), a committee organized by the Ontario Good Roads Association (OGRA). 
 

5.  City Council request the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to include this issue in their upcoming Annual Conference and Trade Show, scheduled to be held May 31 to June 3, 2018.

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:

1.  Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to include support of initiatives that reduce congestion and increase vehicle throughput in the Automated Vehicle Tactical Plan 2019-2021, contained in Attachment 3 to the report (January 5, 2018) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

The General Manager, Transportation Services gave a presentation on Preparing the City of Toronto for Automated Vehicles.

Automated vehicles are now on Toronto's streets, in various forms and for a variety of purposes. Partially automated vehicles are providing assistance to drivers in the form of cruise control, automated braking, and other safety features included in newer vehicles. Highly automated vehicles - often referred to as driverless or autonomous cars - are being tested on public roads in Ontario, including Toronto, through a permit from the Ministry of Transportation. These more advanced vehicles have the potential to reshape our transportation system, impacting road safety, traffic congestion, mobility equity, and environmental health.

This report responds to a request from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee to provide an overview of the steps taken to date, and actions proposed, to prepare the City of Toronto for the introduction of automated vehicles. This includes the following:

-  A brief technical overview of automated vehicles;

-  Information on early public opinion regarding automation;

-  An overview of how Transportation Services has been preparing for change; and

-  An overview of the potential implications for City divisions and agencies.

The report further outlines next steps proposed, including the following:

- The development of a cross-divisional policy position to ensure preparedness amongst all City services; and

-  The deepening of partnerships, including formal membership in the Municipal Alliance for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles in Ontario (MACAVO) and support for the University of Toronto's proposed iCity Centre for Automated and Transformative Transportation Systems.

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

1. City Council temporarily close, to vehicular and pedestrian traffic, the westbound lanes of Eglinton Avenue West from a point approximately 100 metres east of Strathearn Road to William R. Allen Road from January 31, 2018 to and including December 31, 2021.

2. City Council temporarily close, to vehicular traffic, the eastbound lanes of Eglinton Avenue from Duplex Avenue to Holly Street from December 31, 2018 to and including July 31, 2019.

3.  City Council temporarily close, to vehicular traffic, the westbound lanes of Eglinton Avenue East between Dunfield Avenue and Cowbell Lane from April 30, 2018 to and including July 31, 2019.

4.  City Council temporarily close, to pedestrian traffic, the south side sidewalk on Eglinton Avenue East, between a point 215 metres east of Kennedy Road and a point 140 metres west of Midland Avenue, from December 31, 2017 to and including December 31, 2021. 

5. City Council temporarily rescind the one-way northbound operation on Gilgorm Road, between Eglinton Avenue West and New Haven Drive, for approximately 12 additional months from June 30, 2018 to and including June 30, 2019, in order to facilitate the construction of Metrolinx Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit Chaplin Station.

6. City Council amends City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways: Section 937-4. Closures which require Council approval to delegate the General Manager, Transportation Services, the authority to temporarily partially or fully close Black Creek Drive to vehicular and pedestrian traffic immediately north of Eglinton Avenue West, from February 1, 2018, to and including December 31, 2019, including up to 10-weekend full closures, as required to facilitate the construction of Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit elevated guideway.

7. City Council exempt the General Manager, Transportation Services, in carrying out her authority under Part 3 above, from Section 937-5 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways.

8. City Council direct that the traffic lanes and sidewalks be reopened when the project is complete.

The purpose of this report is to seek approval to extend previously-approved long-term road closures for the construction of the Metrolinx Eglinton Crosstown LRT. Crosslinx Transit Solutions (CTS) has experienced delays in receiving utility and Ministry of Environment (MOE) permits, and plan approvals by project stakeholders. Consequently, they have revised their construction staging schedules, impacting the anticipated timelines to close specific road and sidewalk segments.

Specifically, this report recommends the continuation of:

- The ongoing closure of the Eglinton Avenue westbound lanes approaching Allen Road, to support the construction of Cedarvale Station. Traffic will continue to operate bi-directionally in what were previously eastbound lanes.

- The ongoing closure of one eastbound and one westbound lane on Eglinton Avenue to the east of Yonge Street, to support the construction of Eglinton Station. Traffic will continue to operate with one lane available in each direction.

- The ongoing closure of the south sidewalk on Kennedy Road to support the construction of Kennedy Station. Alternative pedestrian access has been provided.

- The ongoing operation of Gilgorm Road as a two-way road, in order to support the construction of Chaplin Station.

In addition, this report also seeks approval to grant the General Manager, Transportation Services the authority to temporarily close Black Creek Drive traffic lanes (full or partial) as requested by Metrolinx and its contractor CTS to construct the elevated guideway substructure and superstructure including widening works, protection works and box girder erection and installation.

The Striking Committee recommends that:  

1.  City Council the nominate the following Members for appointment to the Hockey Hall of Fame Board of Directors for a term of office beginning at the Annual Meeting in Spring 2018 to the Annual Meeting in Spring 2019:

Councillor Mark Grimes

Councillor Stephen Holyday

Councillor Frances Nunziata

The purpose of this report is to nominate Council Members for appointment to the Hockey Hall of Fame Board of Directors.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the Draft Official Plan Amendment appended as Attachment No. 1 to the report (December 12, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. 

2.  City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment appended as Attachment No. 2 to the report (December 12, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. 

3.  City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No.7625 substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment appended as Attachment No. 3 to the report (December 12, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

5.  In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law No. 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that should City Council approve Parts 1-4 above, the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision as illustrated in the October 27, 2017 report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to:

i.  Any conditions identified by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, which must be fulfilled prior to final approval and the release of the Plan of Subdivision for registration.

ii.  Any such revisions to the proposed Plan of Subdivision or any such additional modified conditions as the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

6.  Prior to the introduction of the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:

i.  Submit a Functional Servicing Report for review and acceptance by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, to determine the stormwater runoff, sanitary flow, groundwater flow and water supply demand resulting from this development and demonstrate how this site can be serviced and whether the existing municipal infrastructure is adequate to accommodate the proposed development.

ii.  Submit a Traffic Impact Study to the City for review and acceptance by the General Manager of Transportation Services, that will determine whether the existing road network can support the proposed development and whether improvements to the existing road infrastructure are required.

iii.  Enter into a financially secured agreement for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support the development, according to the Functional Servicing Report and Traffic Impact Study accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager of Transportation Service, respectively.

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 16, 2018, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

At its meeting of November 14, 2017, Etobicoke York Community Council considered a report dated October 27, 2017 from the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, regarding Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications, entitled “Refusal Report - 3002 - 3014 Islington Avenue”. 

Etobicoke York Community Council recommended that:

1.  City Council receive for information the report (October 27, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, titled "3002 – 3014 Islington Avenue – Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications – Refusal Report".

2.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to submit to the January 16, 2018 Etobicoke York Community Council meeting, a Final Report for the property municipally known as 3002 – 3014 Islington Avenue, which includes an implementing Official Plan Amendment and amendment to Zoning By-law No.'s 7625 and 569-2013, to permit and implement the development at 3002-3014 Islington Avenue as currently outlined in the report (October 27, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

3.  City Council authorize the City Clerk to provide notice of a statutory public meeting for the property municipally known as 3002 – 3014 Islington Avenue to be scheduled for the January 16, 2018 Etobicoke York Community Council meeting, in accordance with the requirements of the Planning Act. 

On December 5, 6 and 7, 2017, City Council adopted the recommendations of Etobicoke York Community Council.

This report responds to the direction of City Council, which includes the required implementation instruments to permit the proposed development.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code, as amended, for the lands at 62 and 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (December 13, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

2.  City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 for the lands at 62 and 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (December 13, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 16, 2018, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 to permit a multi-unit residential development comprised of 28 3-storey stacked townhouses at 62 and 68 Long Branch Avenue and 28 Marina Avenue.  The proposed total gross floor area is approximately 3,300 m² and the development would have a floor space index of 1.6 times the lot area. Vehicle access to the site would be provided from Long Branch Avenue and a total of 34 vehicle parking spaces would be provided in a single level underground garage.

The proposed development and the site specific amendments to the Zoning By-laws are consistent with the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement and conform to the Provincial Growth Plan and City of Toronto Official Plan. Further, the proposal is appropriate for the site and compatible with the surrounding area.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws as set out in Attachments 7 and 8 to this report.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law No. 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium for the lands at 4780 Eglinton Avenue West, as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to the report (December 7, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to:

a.  The Conditions as generally listed in Attachment 3 to the report (December 7, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the Plan of Condominium for registration.

b.  Any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

2.  City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 4780 Eglinton Avenue as generally illustrated on Attachment 4 to the report (December 7, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

3.  City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

4.  Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his designate.

5.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.

6.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

7.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 16, 2018, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Two applications have been submitted to facilitate the townhouse development at 4780 Eglinton Avenue West. One application proposes a common elements condominium for a shared driveway to provide access to 6 units within Block 14 of the subdivision plan. The other application requests exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the 89 townhouse units.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium subject to conditions and approval of Part Lot Control Exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his designate.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to settle the appeal of Zoning By-law Amendment Application Number 13 162096 WET 07 OZ at 111 Plunkett Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 2 to the report (December 11, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

2.  In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law No. 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to authorize the City Solicitor to support the OMB appeal of Draft Plan of Subdivision Application Number 13 162112 WET 07 SB at 111 Plunkett Road as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to the report (October 25, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to:

a.  The Conditions as generally listed in Attachment 7 to the report (October 25, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to final approval and the release of the Plan of Subdivision for registration.

b.  Any such revisions to the proposed Plan of Subdivision or any such additional modified conditions as the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

3.  In the event the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment and the Draft Plan of Subdivision until:

a.  The owner submits, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, an updated Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report.

b.  The Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services has confirmed that the hydrogeological assessment, included under Appendix F of the Functional Servicing Report dated June 2016 prepared by WSP Canada Inc. confirms whether there will be any short-term or long-term discharge of groundwater, directly or indirectly, to a City sewer.

c.  A draft zoning by-law be submitted to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

d.  Draft Plan of Subdivision Conditions be submitted to the OMB to address the technical requirements of the development including among other matters, the construction of streets and services, tree protection and planting and grading as determined by the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

4.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other City staff to take such actions as necessary to give effect to City Council's decision.

These applications propose to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 and to seek Draft Plan of Subdivision approval to develop a new residential neighbourhood on the former St. Gasper Catholic School site at 111 Plunkett Road, formerly part of 135 Plunkett Road. This extension to the surrounding neighbourhood would be comprised of 21 residential semi-detached building lots (42 dwellings), a new public walkway and a new public road. The proposed buildings would be three storeys and range in height from 8.8 to 10 metres.

The Draft Plan of Subdivision application proposes to establish a new public road, public walkway and residential development blocks. The new public road would provide access to Plunkett Road with a right-of-way width of 18.5 metres and terminate in two cul-de-sacs at the east and north ends of the site.

The applicant has appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment and Subdivision applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  This report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, attend the OMB hearing in support of the Zoning By-law Amendment application.  Also in accordance with Chapter 415-16, 18 and 18.1 of the Municipal Code, the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, advises City Council that he intends to authorize the City Solicitor to attend the OMB in support of the application for Draft Plan of Subdivision as generally illustrated in Attachment 2 and subject to the Conditions in Attachment 7 to this report.

A Request for Direction Report on the subject applications was considered by Etobicoke York Community Council on November 14, 2017. This report addresses Etobicoke York Community Council's request for the City Solicitor and the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District to work with the applicant to explore ways and means of having the proposed public roads pre-serviced, including the resolution of conditions set out in Attachment 7 of the report (October 25, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

Etobicoke York Community Council also requested that the updated architectural plans for Block 10 be reviewed by staff. As a result of this assessment, this report recommends a revision to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment contained in the report (October 25, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District to increase the maximum permitted building height on Block 10 from 8.8 metres to 9.4 metres.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:  

1.  City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 68 Baby Point Road in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to modify the existing east elevation with such alterations substantially in accordance with elevation drawings prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd., Architects (dated November 29, 2017) and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services (HPS) satisfactory to the Senior Manager, HPS and subject to the provision of building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures including a description of materials and finishes to be prepared by the project architect and qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property at 68 Baby Point Road. The property at 68 Baby Point Road is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The applicant is proposing to modify the secondary (east) elevation with both the introduction of additional windows and the enlargement of some other window openings. City Council's approval of the proposed alterations to the heritage property is required under the Ontario Heritage Act.

The Toronto Preservation Board on December 14, 2017, recommended to the Etobicoke York Community Council, adoption of the recommendations contained the report (November 30, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 68 Baby Point Road.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 17 Thirty Eighth Street.

This report recommends that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 17 Thirty Eighth Street. The application indicates that the reasons for removal are the tree's poor health, close proximity to the dwelling and deck, and concerns that the tree's roots are growing underneath paved surfaces.

The tree in question is a white pine (Pinus strobus) measuring 68 cm in diameter. The Private Tree By-law does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council prohibit northbound left turn movements at all times on Queen's Plate Drive at the south driveway access to 840 Queen's Plate Drive, approximately 105 metres north of Rexdale Boulevard.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to prohibit northbound left turn movements at all times on Queen's Plate Drive at the south driveway access to 840 Queen's Plate Drive, approximately 105 metres north of Rexdale Boulevard.

This proposed left-turn prohibition is part of site plan approval conditions for the newly constructed condominium apartment building at 840 Queen's Plate Drive. The proposed left turn prohibition is needed to mitigate interference with southbound vehicles turning left into the existing driveway access to Woodbine Centre, opposite 900-930 Queen's Plate Drive.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Queen's Plate Drive, City Council approval of this report is required.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council prohibit southbound left-turns between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday at Royal York Road and King Georges Road.

The purpose of this report is to ament the Municipal Code, Chapter 950, Schedule 23, Prohibited Turns, to reflect signs which have existed for many years, prohibiting southbound left turns on Royal York Road to King Georges Road, between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Royal York Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council amend the existing right turn prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, for southbound traffic on Weston Road at Little Avenue, to exclude bicycles.

2. City Council amend the existing left turn prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, for northbound traffic on Weston Road at Little Avenue, to exclude bicycles.

The purpose of this report is to amend the existing southbound "No Right Turn, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday" regulation for southbound traffic and the existing northbound "No Left Turn, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday" for northbound traffic on Weston Road at Little Avenue, to exclude bicycles.

As Weston Road is a transit route, this matter requires the approval of City Council.  Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) staff has been advised of the issue and have not objected to the recommendation.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council approve the removal of the pedestrian crossover on Brown's Line at Woodbury Road as this location fails the pedestrian crossover safety audit.

2.  City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Brown's Line and Woodbury Road.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of traffic control signals at the intersections of Brown's Line and Woodbury Road.

Although the warrants for the installation of traffic control signals are not met, a safety audit of the existing pedestrian crossover on Brown's Line Road and Woodbury Road revealed that this location is no longer environmentally suitable for a pedestrian crossover given the operating speed of vehicular traffic on Brown's Line. Based on the results of the pedestrian crossover audit, staff is recommending that the pedestrian crossover be replaced with traffic control signals.

Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Brown's Line, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC staff has been consulted on the matter and have not objected to the proposal.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Dufferin Street and Rosemount Avenue.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of a traffic control signal at the intersection of Dufferin Street and Rosemount Avenue.

The installation of traffic control signals is technically justified and will enhance safety for pedestrians and motorists at the intersection. However, the installation may increase delays for northbound and southbound motorists, as these movements will no longer operate with free flow.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates bus service on Dufferin Street, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC has been advised on the matter.

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council approve the installation of an on-street accessible parking space at the location identified in Appendix A attached to the report (December 14, 2017) from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of an on-street accessible parking space for persons with disabilities.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject street, City Council approval of this report is required.

North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 16, 2018 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

North York Community Council:

1. Directed City Planning staff to conduct a lot study on the residential streets bounded by Highway 401, Dufferin Street, Caledonia Road, and Orfus Road to identify and discourage lot severances and assembly in the area.

2. Directed City Planning staff to review further noise and vibration attenuation measures and report to City Council at its next meeting on January 31, 2018.

These applications for Zoning By-law Amendments and Draft Plan of Subdivision propose to amend the former North York Zoning By-law and City of Toronto Zoning By-law and subdivide the lands at 36 and 37 Jane Osler Boulevard and 42 and 44 Cartwright Avenue to permit 8 detached dwellings on 8 residential lots on a public street terminating in a cul-de-sac. 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

This report also recommends that City Council designate the proposed lots as a Class 4 Area under relevant provincial noise guidelines administered by the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC).

A Class 4 noise area classification allows for higher daytime and night-time sound level limits than would otherwise be permitted in relation to a noise sensitive land use such as residential dwellings and associated outdoor living areas. The impact of such higher levels is mitigated by specified noise control measures.

Environmental noise impact assessments prepared in support of this development confirm that the proposed lots within the draft plan of subdivision can be appropriately considered for a Class 4 noise area classification provided specific noise control measures are incorporated within the design of the development. Required measures will be secured in the draft plan of subdivision conditions.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment application in its current form for the lands located at 470, 490 and 530 Wilson Avenue.

 
2. City staff continue discussions with the applicant to revise their proposal to address outstanding issues outlined in the report (December 15, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
 

3. City Council defer making a decision on Rental Housing Demolition application (File No. 16 270452 NNY 10 RH) under Municipal Code, Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to demolish the 110 existing rental dwelling units at 470 and 490 Wilson Avenue and instruct staff to report on the Section 111 Application to North York Community Council at such time as an Ontario Municipal Board decision has been issued regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the lands at 470, 490 and 530 Wilson Avenue.
 

4. In the event that any development arising out of the subject application is approved, City Council require on-site parkland dedication be conveyed to the City pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act.
 

5. Should the Ontario Municipal Board approve the application, City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the Ontario Municipal Board that the Zoning By-law Amendment should not be approved without the provision of such services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be considered appropriate by the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the applicant and the Ward Councillor.
 

6. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its Order(s) approving the application until such time as:
 

a. the Board has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is in a form satisfactory to the Acting Chief Planner and City Solicitor including securing the replacement rental dwelling units and rents, tenant assistance and other rental related matters at least in conformity with Section 3.2.1.6 of the Official Plan and the owner has entered into and registered a Section 37 Agreement with the City incorporating such replacement rental dwelling units, rents, tenant assistance and other related rental matters and other Section 37 matters, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and

 
b. City Council has dealt with application 16 270452 NNY 10 RH, under Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act to demolish 110 existing rental dwelling units at 470 and 490 Wilson Avenue.

 
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps, as required, to implement the foregoing.

This application proposes to amend the zoning by-law to permit a 13 storey condominium building (353 units), a 12 storey rental apartment building (158 units) and two 4.5 storey stacked back-to-back townhouse buildings (112 units) on the site located at 470, 490 and 530 Wilson Avenue. The proposed redevelopment includes a three level underground parking garage with a total of 559 parking spaces and 5 surface parking spaces. The proposal also includes the demolition of a four-storey commercial office building and two four-storey residential rental buildings that contain a total of 110 rental units.  The applicant has also filed a Rental Housing Demolition application (File No. 16 270452 NNY 10 RH).

The owner appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed times frames set out in the Planning Act.  A prehearing has been scheduled for February 16, 2018.

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the application, as currently proposed by the applicant as staff have concerns with the development application in its current form, including lack of on-site parkland dedication, rental housing and office replacement, proposed height and density, built form, massing and proposed separation between the mid-rise buildings and stacked townhouses.  This report also recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an effort to address the issues outlined in the report.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with any appropriate City staff, to attend an Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the appeal of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for 289 Finch Avenue East in its current form, and to retain outside consultants as may be required.

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning and Urban Design staff and any other appropriate staff and in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to continue negotiations with the applicant to achieve a settlement of the appeal based upon the submission of detailed plans and drawings showing revisions to the design of the proposed townhouses to be more in keeping with the low-rise residential character of the neighbourhood to the north of the subject property.

3. In the event that a resolution of the appeal is reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning and any appropriate City staff, to attend an Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of a settlement to the appeal of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment for 286 Finch Avenue West, as outlined in the Final Report (October 27, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and the draft Zoning By-law Amendments attached as Attachments No. 1 and No. 2 to the report (December 15, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the appropriate amendments to give effect to the revised design of the proposed townhouses as negotiated pursuant to Recommendation 2 above, and provided the conditions as outlined in the report (December 15, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, are agreed upon by the applicant.

4. In the event the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its Order approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until the Owner enters into a Site Plan Agreement securing the revised design of the proposed townhouses as negotiated to in Recommendation 2 above.

5. In the event the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its Order approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until the Owner enters into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

a. the following matters will be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience:

i. the Owner shall provide and maintain the 47 existing residential rental units at 286 Finch Avenue West as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, from the date of the Zoning By-law coming into full force and effect and with no applications for demolition or conversion from residential rental use made during such 20 year period, to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor;

ii. the Owner shall secure the following facilities, amenities and building improvements for the existing residential rental units, with no pass-through of costs to the existing tenants, to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor:

a. the Owner shall add outdoor amenity space in the form of a courtyard that is adjacent to the entrance of the existing building fronting Finch Avenue West, and this space shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

b. the Owner shall add an enclosed garbage collection area to the rear of the existing building;

c. the Owner shall add a new Type G loading area to the rear of the existing building;

d. the Owner shall add bicycle spaces/racks for tenants of the existing building in the proposed new underground parking lot and the tenants of the existing building shall have access to those additional bicycle spaces/racks on the same basis as residents of the new building(s);

e. the Owner shall add landscaping in the form of green space, planters or other appropriate landscaping to the entrances of the existing ground floor units at the rear of the existing building to distinguish between the entrance to these units and the adjacent parking spaces to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

f. the Owner shall undertake improvements to the common doorways throughout the existing building; and

g. the Owner shall install and maintain security cameras in all indoor and outdoor common areas.

iii. the Owner shall provide a Construction Mitigation Strategy to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

iv. the Owner shall provide a Tenant Communication Plan to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

v. the Owner shall, prior to the final site plan approval, submit a financial guarantee in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, made payable to the Treasurer, City of Toronto, to guarantee the provision of watermain upgrades with servicing off of Brenthall Avenue to accommodate the development of the townhouses in the amount of $325,000.00. In addition, the Owner shall submit an engineering and inspection fee in the amount of $18,000.00 by certified cheque and insurance as required, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services;

vi. the Owner shall, prior to the condominium registration enter into an agreement to provide for the shared access of and maintenance and easements with respect to the shared driveway, underground parking/bike parking, walkway, loading areas, servicing areas or any other commonly accessed areas as illustrated on any approved drawing between this condominium and the existing 4-storey rental apartment building to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor; and

vii. the Owner shall submit to the Executive Director, Engineering & Construction Services, for review and acceptance, prior to depositing in the appropriate Land Registry Office, a draft Reference Plan of Survey, in metric units and integrated with the Ontario Co-ordinate System, showing the co-ordinate values at the main corners of the development lands, and delineating thereon, by separate PARTS, the lands to be severed and any appurtenant rights-of-way.

6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other City Staff to take such actions as necessary to give effect to these recommendations.

On November 14th, 2017, North York Community Council deferred the Final Report (NY26.1) dated October 27, 2017 from the Director of Community Planning , North York District on the Zoning By-law Amendment application for the subject lands. Planning staff recommended approval of the application.

This report provides additional information and revised recommendations to those in the previously submitted Final Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, dated October 27, 2017. The owner appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application on November 17, 2017 to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing City Council's lack of decision on the applications within the time frames specified in the Planning Act.

This report recommends the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, attend the OMB hearings in support of a settlement to the appeal of the above application as outlined in the recommendations below.

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 14, 2017 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

An application for Zoning By-law Amendments has been submitted for the lands located at 286 Finch Avenue West. This application proposes a residential infill development consisting of 25 three-storey stacked townhouse units fronting onto Brenthall Avenue. The proposed development would be three storeys plus a rooftop landing and have a gross floor area of 2,101 square metres. The existing four-storey, 47-unit rental apartment building fronting onto Finch Avenue West will be retained. As part of the proposal, a number of improvements and renovations are proposed to the existing rental apartment building.

The proposed 25 units to the north side of the site are to be condominium. Matters relating to site access and continued maintenance of the site as a whole are secured as a legal convenience in a Section 37 Agreement.

The proposed stacked townhouse development conforms to the development criteria for Mixed Use Areas, Healthy Neighbourhoods, Built Form, and Housing Policies of the Official Plan.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council authorize the entering into of a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the Hoover House at 4700 Keele Street in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into a heritage easement agreement for the property at 4700 Keele Street.

This report recommends that Toronto City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the Hoover House on the property at 4700 Keele Street and that Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council to this effect. The subject property is part of the York University Campus. Council-approved conditions relating to a 2015 plan of subdivision and rezoning for York University included the condition that York University enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the Hoover House. A Heritage Easement Agreement will allow for the protection of the designated heritage property in perpetuity.

This report recommends that Toronto City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the Hoover House on the property at 4700 Keele Street and that Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council to this effect. The subject property is part of the York University Campus. Council-approved conditions relating to a 2015 plan of subdivision and rezoning for York University included the condition that York University enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the Hoover House. A Heritage Easement Agreement will allow for the protection of the designated heritage property in perpetuity.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council classify the lands municipally originally known as 80 Carl Hall Road, previously being subject to Plan of Subdivision Application No. 10 252415 NNY 09 SB, as a Class 4 Noise Area pursuant to Publication NPC-300 (MOECC Environmental Noise Guideline – Stationary and Transportation Sources – Approval and Planning) with the exception of Block K, the municipal park block, on the Block Key Plan for Stanley Greene as shown on Attachment 1 to the report (December 14, 2017) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her/his designate be directed to provide a copy of the City Council Decision Document to the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) and Bombardier Aerospace.

This report recommends that City Council designate the development blocks the Stanley Greene District as a Class 4 Area under relevant provincial noise guidelines administered by the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change (MOECC).

A Class 4 Area designation allows for higher daytime and night-time sound level limits than would otherwise be permitted in relation to a noise sensitive land use such as residential dwellings and associated outdoor living areas.  The impact of such higher levels is mitigated by specified noise control measures.

An Environmental Noise Analysis prepared in support of the development within the Stanley Greene Subdivision lands confirm that the development blocks within the plan of subdivision can be appropriately considered for a Class 4 Area designation.

A Class 4 Area designation endorsed by City Council resolution will allow for existing industrial and manufacturing operations located east of the Stanley Greene District, including Bombardier Aerospace, to use this noise classification and sound level limits in applications for required provincial approvals including operating certificates.

North York Community Council recommends that:  

1. City Council approve the 4050 Yonge Street – Public Art Plan attached as Attachment 1 to the report (November 13, 2017) from the Director, Urban Design.

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 4050 Yonge Street – Public Art Plan. The Plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on publicly-accessible privately-owned areas of the development site.

 
This Public Art Plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the development background; public  art sites and opportunities; selection process; artist candidates; technical review; jury composition; budget; timelines; project team and role of the art consultant.

The attached plan meets the objectives of the City Planning's Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the closure of the west sidewalk and 1.7 metres of the southbound curb lane on Yonge Street, from Helendale Avenue to a point 58 metres south, from February 1, 2018 to February 1, 2019.

2. City Council rescind the existing pay parking regulation on the west side of Yonge Street, from Helendale Avenue to a point 58 metres south of Helendale Avenue.

3. City Council enact "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on west side of Yonge Street, between Helendale Avenue and a point 58 metres south of Helendale Avenue.

4. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently displayed and legible from 20 metres.

5. City Council direct that Yonge Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

As Yonge Street is a major arterial roadway, this proposed long term sidewalk and road occupation requires City Council approval.

A 29-storey mixed use residential and retail development with 3 levels of below grade parking at 2360 Yonge Street has been authorized for construction on the southwest corner of Yonge Street and Helendale Avenue. The developer will be permitted to construct this building to within one metre of the Yonge Street road allowance, and will perform construction of streetscaping on the road allowance.

On June 28, 2017 City Planning, North York District, provided Notice of Approval Conditions to the applicant to allow preliminary construction while the site plan agreement is being prepared by Toronto Legal Services.

In order to facilitate the excavation of this property and subsequent site construction, the property owner and developer, Helendale GP Incorporated for Helendale LP, has submitted an application to Transportation Services to close the west sidewalk and partial south bound curb lane on Yonge Street from Helendale Avenue to a point 58 metres south. This closure is required to provide a temporary covered walkway for pedestrians and a construction staging area in the southbound curb lane on Yonge Street. 

The applicant originally requested the closure for 36 months.  However, this report recommends a closure for the maximum of one year.  Any time extensions that are shown to be needed to continue with the safe construction of the building will be reported to North York Community Council before the one-year time period has elapsed.

Helendale GP Incorporated for Helendale LP also requests the closure of the eastbound curb lane and south sidewalk on Helendale Avenue. This location is currently occupied by an adjacent construction staging area and will not be available until April 30, 2018.  This matter will be dealt with in a future companion report requiring North York Community Council approval.

North York Community Council recommends that:  

1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes:

a. 75 Billy Bishop Way;

b. 65 Overlea Boulevard;

c. 2350 Bayview Avenue; and

d. 99 The Donway West.

2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following request noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

a. Liquor Licence extension, from Hamaz Tashjian, Manager, Armenian Community Centre, for the ACC (Armenian Community Centre) Summerfest 2018, to be held on Friday, July 13, 2018 from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; Saturday, July 14, 2018 from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and Sunday, July 15, 2018 from 5:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. at the Armenian Community Centre, 50 Hallcrown Place.

North York Community Council, under its delegated authority under Chapter 27-152, Delegation to Community Councils, declared the following to be events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes:

a. the "Toronto Roller Derby Double Header" events to be held on January 20, 2018 from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.; February 10, 2018 from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.; March 10, 2018 from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m.; and on March 24, 2018 from 5:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., at 40 Carl Hall Road, Studio 3, Downsview Park; and

b. the "Grandiosa Festa", a fundraising event for a church in Portugal, to be held on Saturday, January 20, 2018, from 6:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at Union 183, 1263 Wilson Avenue.

Seeking endorsement of events for Municipal Significance for liquor licensing purposes.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 168 Grandravine Drive.

This report recommends that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 168 Grandravine Drive. The application indicates the reasons for removal are to address concerns the tree is too big for its location and that sap is accumulating on the front walkway and damaging the property owner's car.

The subject tree is a Colorado spruce (Picea pungens), measuring 46 cm in diameter. The Private Tree By-law does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the request for a permit to remove one (1) City-owned tree located at 4 Clovelly Avenue, conditional upon:

a. the owner providing payment of the appraised value of the tree to be removed ($1,884.00);

b. the owner removing the tree at their expense; 

c. the owner providing five (5) replacement trees, which can be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu of planting; and

d. the owner providing a tree planting security deposit to cover the cost of replacement for a period of two years for all trees to be planted on City property.

The report recommends that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) City-owned tree located adjacent to the property at 4 Clovelly Avenue. The application indicates the reasons for removal are that the tree has a poor form, is unsightly and diseased, sheds branches, and leans.

The subject tree is a Colorado spruce (Picea pungens), measuring 37 cm in diameter. The Street Tree By-law does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation, given that all motions placed lost on a tie vote.

The following motions were placed at the North York Community Council meeting on January 16, 2018 and all motions lost on a tie vote:

1. Motion moved by Councillor Carmichael Greb:

"That North York Community Council recommend that:

1. City Council approve the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 367 Joicey Boulevard, conditional upon:

a. the owner providing five (5) replacement trees, which can be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu of planting."

2. Motion moved by Councillor Carroll:

"That North York Community Council recommend that:

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 367 Joicey Boulevard."

This report recommends that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 367 Joicey Boulevard. The application indicates the removal has been requested to accommodate construction of a pool and new landscaping.

The subject tree is a honey locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) measuring 45 cm in diameter. The Private Tree By-Law does not support removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) City-owned tree located at 5 Chieftain Crescent.

This report recommends that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) City-owned tree adjacent to the property at 5 Chieftain Crescent. The application indicates the reason removal has been requested is to address concerns that the tree is not healthy and is in conflict with a proposed driveway.

The subject tree is a Norway maple (Acer platanoides) measuring 45 cm in diameter. The Street Tree By-law does not support removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council prohibit parking at all times on the south side of Vanderhoof Avenue, between Brentcliffe Road and Thomas Elgie Drive, and between a point 144 metres east of Brian Peck Crescent and Research Road.

2. City Council rescind the stopping prohibition in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on both sides of Vanderhoof Avenue, between Brentcliffe Road and Research Road.

There has been an ongoing issue with trucks parking on Vanderhoof Avenue, east of Brentcliffe Road, impeding access to driveways on the south side of the road. Therefore, I am requesting to prohibit parking at all times on the south side of Vanderhoof Avenue between Brentcliffe Road and Aerodrome Crescent (west). Furthermore, there is a discrepancy between the bylaw schedules and the existing signed parking and stopping regulations on Vanderhoof Avenue. I am requesting amendments to the bylaw schedules to address this discrepancy.

North York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council rescind the parking prohibition in effect from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. from December 1 to March 31 on St. Dennis Drive, between Don Mills Road and Wynford Drive.

2. City Council prohibit parking at all times on both sides of St. Dennis Drive, between Linkwood Lane and Wynford Drive.

Currently, under Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, there is a winter maintenance parking prohibition in effect from 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., December 1 to March 31, on roadways in the former City of North York. This is an unsigned parking regulation.

I am requesting to exempt St. Dennis Drive, from Don Mills Road to Linkwood Lane, from this parking prohibition to make it consistent with the former City of Toronto and Borough of East York. The statutory three-hour parking limit will still be in effect.

In consulting with Transportation Services, Traffic Operations have suggested that a parking prohibition at all times between Linkwood Lane and Wynford Drive is more appropriate due to the characteristics of the roadway in this section. This parking amendment will allow for proper snow maintenance.

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

1.   City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 9396, as amended, for the lands at 2799-2815 Kingston Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Revised Attachment 5 to the report dated December 18, 2017, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

2.   City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 2799-2815 Kingston Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Revised Attachment 6 to the report dated December 18, 2017, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

3.   City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

4.   Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

a.    The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

i     Payment of a financial contribution of $320,000.00 directed towards public realm and streetscape improvements on Kingston Road between Brimley Road and Bellamy Road designed to satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, payable to the Treasurer, City of Toronto, prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit and to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the registration of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made.

ii.   In the event the cash contributions identified in i. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contributions may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.

b.     The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

i.   The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009 and updated through the adoption of item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Management Committee in 2013.

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 16, 2018, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

This application proposes to amend the applicable zoning by-laws to facilitate the redevelopment of the lands at 2799-2815 Kingston Road with a 9 storey, 15,737 square metre (169,392 square foot),  mixed use building comprised of 188 residential dwelling units and approximately 1,328 square metres (14,295 square feet) of ground floor commercial/retail space. The proposal contemplates permissions for a floor space index (FSI) of 4.4 times the lot area. A total of 205 vehicular parking spaces are proposed on the subject lands accessed via a paved rear laneway.

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conforms to the Official Plan and the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The proposal addresses the Avenues and Mid-Rise Guidelines and the land use proposed is compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the relevant Zoning By-laws.

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

1.   City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 55 Mac Frost Way (north portion) as generally illustrated on Attachments 2, 3 and 4 to the report dated December 5, 2017, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

2.   City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary Bills in Council for a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law to expire two years following the date of enactment by City Council.

3.   City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

4.   City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

This application requests exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act for lands municipally known as 55 Mac Frost Way (north portion), to allow the creation of 23 street townhouses and 14 semi-detached dwelling lots fronting onto a new road extension of Mac Frost Way. The subject lands are within a registered plan of subdivision.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Part Lot Control Exemption. The proposal complies with the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of 2 years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

1.   City Council assume the services installed at 3640 St. Clair Avenue East and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plan of Subdivision.

2.   City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this Plan of Subdivision.

3.   City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Plan of Subdivision at 3640 St. Clair Avenue East.

4.   City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Registry Office at the expense of the Owner.

5.  City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

6.  City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plan of Subdivision at 3640 St. Clair Avenue East.

This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the development at 3640 St. Clair Avenue East.

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council designate the westerly southbound lane on Victoria Park Avenue, between Dawes Road and a point 10 metres north, for southbound right turns only, buses excepted.

This report recommends the designation of a southbound right-turn lane on Victoria Park Avenue at Dawes Road.  Currently, there are two undesignated lanes that merge into one lane on the far side of this intersection.

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council designate the westerly southbound lane on Birchmount Road, between Rolark Drive and a point 100 metres north, for southbound right turns only, buses excepted.

This report recommends the adoption of a by-law to designate the southbound right-turn lane on Birchmount Road at Rolark Drive for right turns only, buses excepted.  Currently, there is an undesignated southbound bus bay at this intersection.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council authorize the permanent closure to vehicular traffic of a 0.3 metre wide strip of land on the east side of the north-south portion of the public lane at the rear of 1126-1140 Gerrard Street East and 387 and 387R Leslie Street, designated as Part 1 on Reference Plan 66R-29325, and shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2017-022 (the "Reserve Strip"), attached to the report (May 24, 2017) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix A to the report (May 24, 2017), from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Transportation Services recommends that a 0.3 metre wide strip of land on the east side of the north-south portion of the public lane at the rear of 1126-1140 Gerrard Street East and 387 and 389R Leslie Street be permanently closed to vehicular traffic.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 729-2016, substantially in accordance with Attachment 2 to the report (January 9, 2018), from the Acting Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

This City-initiated application proposes to make amendments to Site Specific By-law No. 729-2016, for a City Council approved 79-unit townhouse development at 26 Ernest Avenue.  The amendments correct zoning standards and maps, and update the timing of securing obligations outlined in the Section 37 attachment.  The proposed amendments maintain the intent of the proposed development described in the staff report dated January 16, 2016 considered by City Council on February 3 and 4, 2016.

This report recommends amending By-law No. 729-2016 with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment shown as Attachment No. 2 to this report, which reflects the approved proposal.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the application for a Section 111 permit in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 to allow the demolition of nine (9) existing rental dwelling units located at 85, 87, 89 and 91 Broadway Avenue and 198 Redpath Avenue subject to the following conditions:

a. The owner shall provide and maintain nine (9) replacement rental dwelling units and two (2) new rental dwelling units, comprised of two (2) bachelor units, two (2) one-bedroom units, six (6) two-bedroom units and one (1) three-bedroom unit, on the subject site for a period of at least twenty (20) years, as generally shown on the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated November 2, 2017. Any revision to these plans must be to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

b. The owner shall provide at least two (2) bachelor and one (1) two-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at affordable rents and five (5) two-bedroom and one (1) three-bedroom replacement rental dwelling units at mid-range rent for a period of at least ten (10) years. The owner shall also provide at least two (2) one-bedroom new rental dwelling units at unrestricted rents;

c. The owner shall provide ensuite laundry in all replacement rental dwelling units and new rental dwelling units;

d. The owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units and new rental dwelling units with access to all indoor and outdoor amenities and bicycle parking on the same terms and conditions as condominium residents;

e. The owner shall provide at least two (2) vehicle parking spaces for rent to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units and new rental dwelling units;

f. The owner shall provide at least seven (7) of the replacement rental dwelling units with a balcony or terrace;

g. The owner shall provide a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to all eligible tenants, including the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

h. The owner shall enter into and register on title one or more Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in 1.a., b., c., d., e., f. and g. above to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and

i. The owner shall enter into and register on title, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the nine (9) replacement rental dwelling units and two (2) new rental dwelling units, without the written consent of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate, to assist with the securing of the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Section 111 agreement.

2. City Council authorize the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue the Preliminary Approval for the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the demolition of the nine (9) existing rental dwelling units at 85, 87, 89 and 91 Broadway Avenue and 198 Redpath Avenue after all of the following have occurred:

a. Satisfaction or securing of the conditions in Recommendation 1 above;

b. The Zoning By-law amendments which were the subject of a hearing at the Ontario Municipal Board have come into full force and effect;

c. The issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

d. The issuance of excavation and shoring permits for the approved structure on the site; and

e. The execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement pursuant to the Planning Act securing Recommendations 1. a., b., c., d., e., f. and g. above and any other requirements of the Zoning By-law Amendment.

3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.

4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the development, after the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

a. The owner erects a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

b. Should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in Recommendation 4. a. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

5. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the recommendations above, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement.

An application for Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act (Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code) has been filed for a residential rental property at 85-91 Broadway Avenue and 198 Redpath Avenue (16 262583 STE 22 RH).  This application seeks approval to demolish 12 dwelling units (9 rental dwelling units and 3 owner occupied dwelling units) in 5 house form buildings and proposes to provide 11 rental dwelling units (9 replacement rental dwelling units and 2 new rental dwelling units) within a new residential building as part of the proposed redevelopment of the site.

This property is part of a related group of buildings at 85, 87, 89 and 91 Broadway Avenue and 198 Redpath Avenue that is subject to a Zoning By-law Amendment application (File No. 15 106950 STE 22 OZ) for the development of a 37-storey mixed-use building containing 351 dwelling units.  The Zoning By-law Amendment application was the subject of a hearing at the Ontario Municipal Board, with a final Order pending until all outstanding matters, including the necessary agreements with the City, are secured.

This report recommends approval of the Section 111 permit application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and the demolition permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 21-35 Sherbourne Street North substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (December 8, 2017) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:

a. Submit a revised Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

b. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 21-33 Sherbourne Street North prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated September 7, 2017, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

c. Enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure the following:

i. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the owner shall provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 3.b. above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

ii. Prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 21-33 Sherbourne Street North, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

A. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect;

B. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 3.b. above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

C. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan.

iii. Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 3.c.ii.C. above the owner shall provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

iv. Prior to obtaining Site Plan Approval, the owner shall make an application for a common elements condominium for 21-33 Sherbourne Street, to provide access to and use of the underground parking structure and any shared services, as appropriate.

4. City Council authorize the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue a Preliminary Approval for the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the demolition of the three rental dwelling units at 29 Sherbourne Street North and 31 Sherbourne Street North after all of the following have occurred:

a. Satisfaction or securing of the Conditions in Recommendation 3 above;

b. Zoning By-law Amendments for this development have come into full force and effect; and

c. The issuance of the Notice of Approval conditions for the site plan approval by the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

5. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has given the Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 4 above for the removal of the three rental dwelling units at 29 Sherbourne Street North and 31 Sherbourne Street North.

The application to amend the Zoning By-law for 21-35 Sherbourne Street North proposes: to demolish the existing building at 29 Sherbourne Street North, the rear portions of 31 and 33 Sherbourne Street North, and five existing detached garages; to construct a new 3-storey residential building with two dwelling units at 29 Sherbourne Street North, rear additions to 31 Sherbourne Street North and 33 Sherbourne Street North, and a shared one-storey below-grade garage with 24 parking spaces; and to convert an existing coach house at 31 Sherbourne Street North into studio space.

As required by the Municipal Code Chapter 667, the owner has also submitted a Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion Application as the proposal involves the demolition of rental dwelling units on a property with six or more dwelling units.  Three rental dwelling units are proposed to be demolished.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law and the rental housing demolition application.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 6752, for all properties located in Olde East York Village: odd and even numbers between 955 to 1068 Coxwell Avenue; 521 and 561 O'Connor Drive; and even numbers between 386 to 394 Plains Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (December 15, 2017) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, for all properties located in Olde East York Village: odd and even numbers between 955 to 1068 Coxwell Avenue; 521 and 561 O'Connor Drive; and even numbers between 386 to 394 Plains Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (December 15, 2017) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-laws as may be required.

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to continue discussions with the property owner, and other Divisions as necessary, to confirm funding and implementation timelines for re-location of the Hydro poles obstructing the sidewalks in front of 1009 Coxwell Avenue and to report to the February 21, 2018 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council.

This application proposes a Zoning By-law Amendment for all of the properties located in the Olde East York Village retail area on Coxwell Avenue to increase the existing front yard setback permission.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council amend the Official Plan to add that part of 305 Dawes Road leased to the Children's Peace Theatre to the list of properties in Site and Area Specific Policy No. 265, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to the report (December 11, 2017) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

This application proposes an Official Plan Amendment for 305 Dawes Road to allow for a lease renewal by the Children's Peace Theatre (the "CPT") on a 465 square metre property owned by the City of Toronto.

The sale or disposal of City-owned lands in the Green Space System and Parks and Open Space Areas is prohibited by Official Plan policies.  An Official Plan Amendment is required because the property is located in the Green Space System and is designated as Parks and Open Space Areas – Natural Areas under the Toronto Official Plan.  The extension of a lease that exceeds a period of 21 years is considered a form of land disposal.

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan to permit the lease extension.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.  In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium for the lands at 378-388 Shuter Street, 47-63 Sutton Avenue and 150-160 Sackville Street, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 of the report (December 15, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:

(a)  the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 of the report (December 15, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, Toronto and East York District, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the Plan of Condominium for registration;  and

(b)  any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

2.  City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 378-388 Shuter Street, 47-63 Sutton Avenue and 150-160 Sackville Street, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

3.  City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

4.  Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or designate.

5.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.

6.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

7.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

This application proposes to establish a driveway as a common element at 378-388 Shuter St, 47-63 Sutton St and 150-160 Sackville St.  The common elements condominium is required to provide legal vehicular access to eighteen (18) residential units and to ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the common elements by the condominium corporation.

The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act is required to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the eighteen (18) residential units: 7 townhouses fronting Shuter Street, 7 townhouses fronting Sutton Avenue, 2 semi-detached dwellings fronting Sutton Avenue and 2 semi-detached dwellings fronting Sackville Street. 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption.  In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or their designate.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council refuse the alterations to the designated heritage property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the construction of a 26.1 metre tall (30 metres including mechanical penthouse) seven storey commercial and office building which will incorporate the two storey designated heritage building in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Superkul inc architect dated November 14, 2016 and date stamped received December 16, 2016, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. issued March 14, 2017, all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2. Should City Council refuse the alterations to the designated heritage property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision.

This report recommends that City Council refuse the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue (including the address at 61 Howard Park Avenue).  The applicant proposes the construction of a 26.1 metre tall (30 metres including mechanical penthouse) seven storey commercial and office building. The building will incorporate and alter the two storey designated heritage building in a manner that would not conserve the cultural heritage values, attributes and character of the property.  City Council's consent is required for the alterations to the designated heritage property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

This report recommends that City Council refuse the proposed alterations to the designated

heritage property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue (including the address at 61 Howard Park

Avenue). The applicant proposes the construction of a 26.1 metre tall (30 metres including

mechanical penthouse) seven storey commercial and office building. The building will

incorporate and alter the two storey designated heritage building in a manner that would not

conserve the cultural heritage values, attributes and character of the property. City Council's

consent is required for the alterations to the designated heritage property under Section 33 of

the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information

(December 1, 2017) Report and Attachments 1 - 3 from the Acting Chief Planner and

Executive Director, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 421

Roncesvalles Avenue

(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-109758.pdf)

Communications

(December 13, 2017) Letter from Bruce C. Ketcheson, Ritchie Ketcheson Hart and

Biggart (PB.Supp.PB28.2.1)

(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pb/comm/communicationfile-74584.pdf)

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage properties at 27, 31 and 33 Sherbourne Street North, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, and the demolition of the heritage property at 29 Sherbourne Street North, in accordance with Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act, substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated September 7, 2017, prepared by ERA Architects Inc + JIAI  on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated September 7 2017, and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

a. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall:

1. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 21-33 Sherbourne Street North prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated August September 17 2017, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2. Enter into and register on the property at 21-33 Sherbourne Street North one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations.

b. That prior to Final Site Plan approval in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment for the property at 21-33 Sherbourne Street North, the owner shall:

1. Provide final site plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1. above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 21-33 Sherbourne Street North, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.1. above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan.

d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.c.3. above the owner shall:

1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to 27, 31 and 33 Sherbourne Street North and the demolition of 29 Sherbourne Street North along with the construction of a replacement structure.  The applicant has applied for a Zoning Amendment for 21-33 Sherbourne Street North to allow for the demolition of 29 Sherbourne Street North and construction of a replacement structure, removal of the rear portions of 31 and 33 Sherbourne Street North and demolition of 5 garages on the entire property with the consolidation of parking in a below-grade garage.  

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to 27, 31 and 33 Sherbourne Street North and the demolition of 29 Sherbourne Street North along with the construction of a replacement structure.  The applicant has applied for a Zoning Amendment for 21-33 Sherbourne Street North to allow for the demolition of 29 Sherbourne Street North and construction of a replacement structure, removal of the rear portions of 31 and 33 Sherbourne Street North and demolition of 5 garages on the entire property with the consolidation of parking in a below-grade garage.  
 
Background Information
(December 1, 2017) Revised Report and Attachments 1 - 3 from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning - Alterations of Four Heritage Properties and Demolition of One Heritage Property and Construction of a Replacement Structure in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District- 27, 29, 31 and 33 Sherbourne Street North
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-109891.pdf)
(December 1, 2017) Report and Attachments 1 - 3 from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning - Alterations of Four Heritage Properties and Demolition of One Heritage Property and Construction of a Replacement Structure in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District- 27, 29, 31 and 33 Sherbourne Street North
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-109753.pdf)

 
Speakers
Douglas De Gannes, ERA Architects Inc.
Jonathan Krehm

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 771 Yonge Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, for the construction of a new tower and podium with alterations to the designated building at 771 Yonge Street in accordance with the settlement offer from the Applicant comprised of the plans and drawings prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates Inc. Architects, dated November 14, 2017, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated November 15, 2017, all on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following conditions:

a. Prior to issuance of an Ontario Municipal Board Order in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the property at 771 Yonge Street, the owner shall:

1. Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 771 Yonge Street substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates Inc. Architects dated November 14, 2017, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated November 15, 2017 or otherwise revised in accordance with a settlement offer or Board Order, subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. below, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including execution of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

2. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 771 Yonge Street, prepared by Goldsmith Borgal & Company Ltd. Architects, dated November 15, 2017 or otherwise a conservation strategy revised in accordance with a settlement offer or Board Order, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

3. Enter into and register on the property at 771 Yonge Street Avenue one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations, including amongst other matters,  securing the preparation  and thereafter the implementation of a Heritage Lighting Plan, a Signage Plan, an Interpretation Plan and requiring a letter of credit to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and approved Interpretation Plan, including provision for upwards indexing, all to the satisfaction of  the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

b. Prior to Final Site Plan approval in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the property at 771 Yonge Street, the owner shall:

1. Provide final site plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject properties, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage properties will be sensitively illuminated to enhance their heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager Heritage Preservation Services.

4. Provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

5. Submit a Signage Plan for the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

c. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 771 Yonge Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage buildings as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

1. Obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendments required for the alterations to the properties at 771 Yonge Street, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council in connection with a Ontario Municipal Board Order and to have come into effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Acting Chief Planner, and the Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.a.2. above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan, Landscape Plan, and Interpretation Plan.

4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property at 771 Yonge Street, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

d. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.c.3. above the owner shall:

1.  Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work, required heritage lighting work, and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan, Lighting Plan, Landscape Plan, and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2. Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 771 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 771 Yonge Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 7 to the report (November 21, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

3. If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of City Council's decision on the designation of the property.

6. City Council authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 771 Yonge Street for the property at 771 Yonge Street in a form and with content satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 771 Yonge Street.

8. City Council request the Applicant to work with City Staff to improve the visual  prominence of the south elevation of 771 Yonge Street and to maintain the continuity of the street frontage through the re-design of the connection between the existing heritage building and the listed property at 765 Yonge Street, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage property at 771 Yonge Street, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site and per the settlement offer submitted to the City by Sherman Brown on July 26, 2017, in conjunction with an appeal to the OMB of the application for Zoning By-law Amendment.  This report also recommends that City Council state its intention to designate 771 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and give authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for this property.

As part of the project scope, the existing property at 771 Yonge Street will be conserved and incorporated into the redevelopment. The tower will be stepped back 10 metres from the Yonge Street property line with a strategy that does not impact the building's three dimensional form through retention of existing wall fabric at all elevations, in-kind reconstruction of the non-heritage roof and restoration of the street facing facades. New retail uses are proposed within the heritage structure with a new floor slab proposed to be reconstructed between the first and second floor levels. Should the alterations to the subject property be approved, staff recommend that the property owner be required to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement to ensure the long-term protection of the heritage property. 

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage property at 771 Yonge Street, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site and per the settlement offer submitted to the City by Sherman Brown on July 26, 2017, in conjunction with an appeal to the OMB of the application for Zoning By-law Amendment.  This report also recommends that City Council state its intention to designate 771 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and give authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement for this property.

As part of the project scope, the existing property at 771 Yonge Street will be conserved and incorporated into the redevelopment. The tower will be stepped back 10 metres from the Yonge Street property line with a strategy that does not impact the building's three dimensional form through retention of existing wall fabric at all elevations, in-kind reconstruction of the non-heritage roof and restoration of the street facing facades. New retail uses are proposed within the heritage structure with a new floor slab proposed to be reconstructed between the first and second floor levels. Should the alterations to the subject property be approved, staff recommend that the property owner be required to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement to ensure the long-term protection of the heritage property. 
 
Background Information
(December 1, 2017) Report and Attachments 1 - 6 from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 771 Yonge Street
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pb/bgrd/backgroundfile-109763.pdf)

 
Communications
(December 13, 2017) Letter from Nicolas Barrette, GBCA Architects Ltd. (PB.Supp.PB28.4.1)
(http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pb/comm/communicationfile-74575.pdf)

 
Speakers
Ralph Giannone, Giannone Petricone Associates Inc. Architects
Chris Borgal, GBCA Architects Ltd.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council refuse application 17 164359 STE 20 OZ for an Official Plan Amendment in the area of the rail corridor generally bounded by Bathurst Street to the West, Blue Jays Way to the east, Front Street West to the north and the Northern Linear Park to the south including 433 Front Street West for all of the reasons set out in the report (December 20, 2017) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District including:

a. the application does not conform with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe;

 
b. the application is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement; 

 
c. the application does not conform to the Official Plan including but not limited to policies related to structuring growth, the downtown, the greenspace system, transportation, built form and public realm, parks and open spaces, Utility Corridors, Mixed Use Areas, and Parks and Open Space Areas; 

 
d. the application does not conform to the Railway Lands Central and Railway Lands West Secondary Plans including but not limited to policies related to major objectives, structure form and physical amenity, parks open space and pedestrian systems, transportation and circulation, environment, future development areas and Utility Corridors;

 
e. the application does not address the emerging directions from the TOCore Planning Study; and 

f.  the proposal is inconsistent with the Railway Lands Central and West Urban Design Guidelines and the Tall Building Design Guidelines.

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of City Council’s decision to refuse the application, in the event that the application is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

3. City Council authorize the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to ensure services, facilities and/or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be required by the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor are secured, should the proposal be approved in some form by the Ontario Municipal Board.

4. In the event this decision is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board and the Board approves some form of development, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its order to ensure that the amendment contains  policies requiring the use of the holding symbols in association with zoning by-law amendments, precinct plans and agreements, subdivision plans and agreements, environmental reports and agreements and public art plans, prior to the removal of the holding symbol to ensure that adequate servicing and infrastructure to support the proposal will be provided and secured.   

The Official Plan amendment application made by P.I.T.S. proposes to amend the Railway Lands West and Central Secondary Plans to permit a mixed-use development over the rail corridor in the area generally bounded by Bathurst Street to the west, Blue Jays Way to the east, Front Street West to the north, and the Northern Linear Park to the south.  A decking structure is proposed to be constructed over the rail corridor to support the development. The application includes the existing Northern Linear Park that extends along the south side of the rail corridor.

The proposed mix of uses includes residential, commercial, retail, institutional and open space uses as well as a potential Metrolinx RER Station at Spadina Avenue and a co-generation plant.   Overall the development proposes, seven primarily residential buildings ranging in height from 27 to 59 storeys, one 36-storey office building and one 4-storey retail building. The proposed overall gross floor area is 368,100 square metres including 159,800 square metres non-residential and 208,300 square metres of residential floor area.  There are 2,750 dwelling units, 1,225 parking spaces and 3,000 bicycle parking spaces proposed. The application proposed to maintain the rail activities below the decking structure.

The Northern Linear Park is proposed to be regraded with portions paved with driveways to provide access to a two level garage for parking and loading to service the development.  The city-owned Puente du Luz pedestrian bridge is proposed to be removed and the area incorporated into the development. 

The application proposes to construct a deck over the rail corridor between Bathurst Street and Blue Jays Way to support a large scale residential and commercial development over a highly active and critical transportation corridor for the movement people and goods for the city, the Province and the country as a whole.  The site is also situated in an area of the city that has experienced rapid growth over a relatively short period of time with over 20,000 people now living in the Railway Lands neighbourhoods. Areas surrounding the Railway Lands have also undergone significant transformation, and have evolved into densely populated mixed-use communities, and high levels of growth in these areas are expected to continue.  In addition to residents, attractions such as the Rogers Centre and Metro Convention Centre and other tourist facilities such as the CN Tower and Ripley’s Aquarium bring many visitors to the area year round, making this a major destination in the City.

The development proposal raises significant planning concerns in respect to the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS), the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, the Official Plan and Railway Lands Secondary Plans. The policy framework recognizes the downtown as an area that will absorb significant growth while at the same time recognizing the need to provide a full range of hard and soft infrastructure in step with growth to create complete communities.   The PPS recognizes the Official Plan as the most important document to implement the PPS.  The proposal is not consistent with the PPS and does not conform to the Growth Plan as it does not address the objectives of the plans to balance growth and infrastructure and poses potential challenges to sustain major transportation infrastructure with the addition of major buildings above the rail corridor.

It does not conform with City of Toronto Official Plan policies to dispose of existing parkland and deliver a high quality built form and enhanced public realm. 

The proposal does not meet major objectives of the Railway Lands Secondary Plans including those to:

-  reduce the barrier effect of the rail corridor by creating new connections across the rail corridor and protecting views across the corridor north and south to adjacent communities and the waterfront;

-  ensure compatibility with the existing and future rail uses and activities in the rail corridor;

-  create connections to and within the Railway Lands both east/west and north/south; and

-  contribute to an attractive, accessible and safe public realm and parks and publicly accessible open spaces which meet a high standards of urban design.

City staff recommend refusal of the application as it does not meet Provincial and Municipal policies and does not represent good planning.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council refuse the Official Plan Amendment application, for the lands at 33 and 37 Parliament Street (file no. 17 219060 STE 28 OZ) for the reasons outlined in the report (December 15, 2017) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.  City Council refuse the Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands at 33 and 37 Parliament Street (file no. 17 219060 STE 28 OZ) for the reasons outlined in the report (December 15, 2017) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning and other appropriate staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of City Council's decision to refuse the application, in the event the decision is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

4.  City Council authorize the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to ensure services, facilities and/or matters pursuant to section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be required by the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor are secured, should the proposal be approved in some form by the Ontario Municipal Board.

5.  In the event this decision is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board and the Board approves some form of development, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its order until a revised functional servicing report and a revised hydrogeological report have been submitted and reviewed to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

6.  In the event this decision is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board and the Board approves some form of development, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, to request the Ontario Municipal Board to place a holding symbol “H” on the amending Zoning By-law until the flood proofing measures are approved by the Province and the appeal period has expired.

7.  In the event this decision is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board and the Board approves some form of development, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its order until an Archaeological Monitoring and Mitigation Strategy has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

This application proposes 15 and 39-storey mixed use buildings.  The proposal contains: 622 residential units; 1,248 square metres of at-grade retail space; and 262 vehicular and 623 bicycle parking spaces within a 3-level underground garage.

The proposal represents over-development of the site.  The application does not conform to the objectives of the in-force Official Plan and King-Parliament Secondary Plan, nor the emerging policy direction of Official Plan Amendment 304.

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and City staff, as appropriate, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing, and to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 421 Roncesvalles Avenue in its present form for the reasons set out in the report (December 12, 2017) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning Division staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in this report, including:

a. reducing the proposed height and massing to avoid overdevelopment of the site and to limit the negative impacts on adjacent properties;

b. improving the interface between the proposed building and the existing heritage building on the site;

c. improving consistency with the Council-approved addendum to the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings (April 20, 2016); and
 

d. determining the appropriate amount of on-site vehicular parking required to accommodate the proposed development.

3. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council directs the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold the issuance of any Order(s) on the Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as:

 
a. The City Solicitor, in consultation with the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the owner have provided draft by-laws to the Ontario Municipal Board in a form and content to the satisfaction of the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District; and,

 
b. The owner addresses the outstanding items in relation to servicing outlined in the memorandum from Engineering and Construction Services dated April 25, 2017 to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.
 

c. The owner provides a cash payment into the Municipal Parking Fund in lieu of any parking shortfall on-site from the Zoning By-law requirement. of parking payment to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services, if the parking supply is less than that required by the existing Zoning By-law.

This Zoning Amendment application proposes to redevelop the property at 421 Roncesvalles Avenue and 61 Howard Park Avenue with a seven-storey commercial and office building which will incorporate the existing two-storey heritage building. The development is proposed to have a height of 26.1 metres (30 metres including the mechanical penthouse). No vehicular parking spaces will be provided and a total of 38 bicycle parking spaces are proposed.

The proposed development would represent overdevelopment of the site, in terms of built form and density and would create an unacceptable form of development. The proposal also does not conserve the cultural heritage value of the existing heritage building as it results in a form, scale and massing that visually subordinates the heritage building. The proposal also does not conform with the Official Plan built form policies for midrise development nor does it satisfactorily respond to the Avenues and Midrise Buildings Guidelines.  Issues raised by the proposal include:

• The proposed scale and form does not address matters of Provincial interest as outlined in Section 2 of the Planning Act, is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and does not conform with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, 2017;
•  
  The proposal is not consistent with policies and development criteria contained within the City of Toronto Official Plan, particularly those related to Avenues, Mixed Use Areas and heritage conservation;
   
• The proposal is not consistent with policies contained within the Ontario Heritage Act related to design, associative value and contextual value;
   
• The proposed height of seven-storeys (30 metres) is not in keeping with the existing and planned context of Roncesvalles Avenue, south of Howard Park Avenue, which contains primarily two and three storey commercial buildings, a number of which have heritage designations;
   
• The proposal is not consistent with the Avenues and Midrise Buildings Study and the Avenues and Mid-Rise Buildings Addendum (April 20, 2016) which identifies Roncesvalles Avenue as a Character Area thereby recommending a maximum height which equals 80 percent of the width of the right-of-way (16 metres); and
   
• The proposal does not adequately justify the lack of on-site vehicular parking.

The purpose of this report is to seek Council's direction for the City Solicitor and other appropriate City staff to attend an Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in opposition to the applicant's current development proposal and appeal.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board mediation, and to oppose the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 122, 124, 126 and 128 Peter Street and 357 and 359 Richmond Street West is its current form for the reasons set out in the report (January 15, 2018) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in this report, including:

a. the conservation of the heritage buildings at 357 and 359 Richmond Street West and 122 and 124 Peter Street;

b. increased ground floor building setbacks along Richmond Street West and Peter Street;

c. increased tower setbacks from the west and south property lines;

d. revisions to the design of the proposal to provide for balconies and/or terraces for a greater proportion of the residential units and that the indoor and outdoor amenity spaces be designed to serve a range of users including children; and

e. revisions to the range in the mix of dwelling units to introduce a greater proportion of two-bedroom units suitable for families with children.

3. City Council authorize the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to identify the matters, services and facilities pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to be secured, in the event the Ontario Municipal Board approves the Zoning By-law amendment application as proposed in whole or in part including contributions in relation to achieving a public open space/park on the block bounded by Spadina Avenue, Peter Street, Adelaide Street West and Richmond Street West, and other public realm improvements within this block as outlined in the King-Spadina East Precinct Public Realm Strategy. 

4. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold the issuance of its final Order until:

a. the final form of the  Zoning By-law amendments are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District;

b. the owner has entered into Heritage Easement Agreements with the City for the properties at 357 and 359 Richmond Street West and 122 and 124 Peter Street to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including execution and registration of such agreements to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

c. the owner has provided a Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant for the properties at 357 and 359 Richmond Street West and 122 and 124 Peter Street to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; 

d. the owner addresses the outstanding items in relation to servicing and the road widening required along Richmond Street West outlined in the memorandum from Engineering and Construction Services dated December 5, 2017, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; and

e. community benefits and other matters in support of the development as are determined appropriate are secured in a Section 37 Agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Acting Director Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the City Solicitor.

On October 31, 2016, the applicant appealed its rezoning application for a 46-storey (138.2 metre) mixed-use building with 435 residential units and a density of 21.0 times the area of the lot to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed period under the Planning Act. Prehearing conferences were held on May 23, 2017 and November 1, 2017. A mediation meeting has been scheduled by the OMB for February 12 and 13, 2018. No hearing dates have been set.

On October 13, 2017, the applicant submitted a with prejudice settlement offer proposing a 38-storey mixed-use building 117 metres high (excluding mechanical penthouse) with 246 dwelling units and 300 square metres of retail space. The total gross floor area of the proposed development is 18,863 square metres representing a density of 13.3 times the area of the site.

The site includes two heritage buildings (semi-detached house form buildings) at 357 and 359 Richmond Street West and 122 and 124 Peter Street. The revised application proposes to demolish the building at 357 and 359 Richmond Street West, and dismantle and reconstruct the building at 122 and

124 Peter Street and incorporate it into the development.

This report seeks Council's direction to oppose the proposed development at the Ontario Municipal Board in its current form. The revised application represents an improvement in the height, density and number of dwelling units in the development, as well as increased building setbacks. However, the application continues to propose the demolition of historically significant buildings. City Planning staff continue to seek greater conservation of the heritage resources on the site as per the Provincial Policy Statement, the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, the Official Plan and the King-Spadina Secondary Plan. As well, increased building setbacks are needed to address a required road widening along Richmond Street West, to provide for wider sidewalk zones along Richmond Street West and Peter Street, and to meet City requirements with respect to tower setbacks. The proposal in its current form does not fit harmoniously within its existing and/or planned context contrary to the Official Plan. The applicant has expressed a continued willingness to work with staff and this report recommends continuing discussions to arrive at a revised proposal that addresses the issues set out in this report.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and other appropriate staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the settlement proposal by the Applicant described in the report (January 9, 2018) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and set out in Attachment 1 - Applicant's Settlement Offer dated July 26, 2017 and the site plans in Attachments 2 to 7, subject to the conditions in the report (January 9, 2018) from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

2. In the event that the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold the issuance of its final Order until:

a. the final form of Zoning By-Law Amendments are to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

b. the owner has entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 771 Yonge Street substantially in accordance with plans and drawings prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates Inc. Architects, (November 14, 2017), and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, (November 15, 2017), or otherwise revised in accordance with the settlement offer or Board Order, subject to and in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.c. below, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and including execution and registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

c. the owner has provided a detailed Conservation Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 771Yonge Street, prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Ltd. Architects, (November 15, 2017), or otherwise revised in accordance with the settlement offer or Board Order, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

d. the owner has entered into and registered on the lands at 767-773 Yonge Street one or more agreements with the City, pursuant to section 37 of the Planning Act, to secure at the owner's expense, with such facilities, services and matters to be additionally set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendments, and subject to the requirements for insurance, indemnity, securing of letters of credit and upwards indexing, the following all to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor:

i. the provision of community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act in the amount of not less than $1,880,000 to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, for the following benefits:

A. An indexed cash contribution of $626,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, to be allocated towards local area park or streetscape improvements, at the discretion of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

B. An indexed cash contribution of $627,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, to be allocated towards existing community, recreation and/or cultural space improvements in the ward, at the discretion of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

C. An indexed cash contribution of $627,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, to be allocated towards new or existing Toronto Community Housing and/or affordable housing;

D. The cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 2.d.i.A., B. and C. above are to be indexed in accordance with the Non-residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported by Statistics Canada or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made to the City;

E. In the event the cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 2.d.i. above have not been used for the intended purposes within 3 years of the site specific By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands;

ii. the provision of a minimum of ten percent (10%) family sized residential dwelling units, containing at least three bedrooms, within the development, to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

iii. the provision of the following facilities, services and matters, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

A. prior to final site plan approval in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment:

I. the owner shall provide final site plan drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.c. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

II. the owner shall provide an Interpretation Plan for the heritage property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

III. the owner shall provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character as viewed from the public realm, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

IV. the owner shall submit a Signage Plan for the development to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

V. the owner shall submit a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

B. Prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the property at 771 Yonge Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

I. have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendments required for the permitted alterations to the property at 771 Yonge Street, with such Amendments being the subject of an Ontario Municipal Board Order allowing the Zoning By-law appeal in part and in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined to the satisfaction of the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and with such by-laws having come into full force and effect;

II. provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 2.c. above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

III. provide a letter of credit, including provision for upwards indexing in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, Heritage Lighting Plan, Landscape Plan, and Interpretation Plan, and subsequently, prior to the release of the letter of credit to secure the conservation work:

a. the owner shall have obtained final site plan approval for the subject property, issued by the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

b. the owner shall provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work has been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

c. the owner shall provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

IV. provide full documentation of the existing heritage property at 771 Yonge Street, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in TIFF format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

V. prior to the commencement of any excavation and shoring work, the owner shall submit a Construction Management Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and thereafter in support of the development will implement the plan during the course of construction. The Construction Management Plan will include, but not be limited to, details regarding size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring activities, measures to ensure safety lighting does not negatively impact adjacent residences, construction vehicle parking locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and any other matters deemed necessary.

e. the owner shall provide any necessary modifications to the transportation impact study, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services;

f. the owner shall provide any necessary modifications to the functional servicing and stormwater management report(s), to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

g. the owner shall provide any necessary modifications to the hydrogeology assessment, geotechnical report and associated municipal servicing plans, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and

h. the owner shall enter into a financially secured agreement with the City (the Section 37 Agreement) for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support the development, according to the Site Servicing and Stormwater Management Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

On January 19, 2017, the applicant appealed its application for a 48-storey (166-metre) mixed-use building with 257 residential units and a density of 19.9 times the area of the lot to the Ontario Municipal Board due to Council's failure to enact the requested amendment within the time allotted by the Planning Act.

On July 27, 2017, after the appeal, the applicant submitted a "With Prejudice" settlement offer, reducing the height of the mixed-use building to 25 storeys (81.7 metres), with 136 residential units and a density of 14.8 times the area of the lot.

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction with respect to the City's position at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing.

The site includes the 771Yonge Street property which is on the City's Heritage Register and is proposed to be conserved and altered. A separate report (December 1, 2017) from Heritage Preservation Services and recommendations from Toronto Preservation Board are scheduled to be considered with this report.

This report recommends that Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to support the settlement proposal at the Ontario Municipal Board.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 16 Cornish Road.

This report recommends that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 16 Cornish Road. The application indicates the reasons for removal are that the property owner wishes to re-landscape the yard, and that the tree is in an undesirable location. They are also concerned about the potential hazard of falling walnuts and the secretion of juglone into the soil preventing other plants from growing.

The subject tree is a black walnut (Juglans nigra), measuring 51 cm in diameter. The Private Tree By-law does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

1. City Council approve the 60 Shuter Street – Public Art Plan attached as Attachment 1 to the report (December 15, 2017), from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning.

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 60 Shuter Street – Public Art Plan. The Plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible privately-owned area of the development site.

This Public Art Plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the project team; project overview; selection process; jury composition; artwork budget and timeline.

The attached plan meets the objectives of the City Planning's Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 38 Bathurst Street.

2.  City Council authorize the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services and the City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that: 

1.  City Council approve the designation of delivery vehicle parking zones and associated required traffic and parking by-law amendments, as described in Attachment 1 to the report (January 15, 2018) from the Acting Director, Transportation Infrastructure Management.

2.  City Council approve the designation of taxi stands at fire hydrants as described in Attachment 2 to the report (January 15, 2018) from the Acting Director, Transportation Infrastructure Management.

3.  City Council approve the addition of designated motorcycle parking zones for the exclusive use of motorcycles between April 1 and October 31, inclusive, of each year as described in Attachment 3 to the report (January 15, 2018) from the Acting Director, Transportation Infrastructure Management.

4. City Council amend section 910-6.3C of Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, by adding the phrase "and the maximum parking periods set out in Schedule IV shall apply to a person parking a motorcycle in any parking space designated for motorcycle parking at the side and between the limits set out in Schedule IV at the end of this chapter between April 1 and October 31, inclusive, of each year."

5. City Council amend section 910-17.1C of Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters by adding the phrase "and the maximum parking periods set out in Schedule IV shall apply to a person parking a motorcycle in any parking space designated for motorcycle parking at the side and between the limits set out in Schedule IV at the end of this chapter between April 1 and October 31, inclusive, of each year."

6. City Council amend section 910-9 of Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, by adding a new subsection E as follows:

E. Despite any other provision of the Municipal Code or any other City of Toronto By-law, the maximum parking period set out in Schedule IV to this chapter, where greater than 3 hours, shall supercede the general three-hour maximum parking period found in Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, and any other by-laws for a person parking a motorcycle in any parking space designated for motorcycle parking at the side and between the limits set out in Schedule IV at the end of this chapter between April 1 and October 31, inclusive, of each year.

City Council, at its meeting of December 5, 6, 7 and 8, 2017 adopted the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW25.12 entitled, "Curbside Management Strategy: Improving How Curbside Space Is Used." In so doing, Council approved a number of priority 'Quick Win' tactics to be initiated as soon as practicable.

The purpose of this report is to outline the non-delegated traffic and parking by-law amendments required to initiate three of these 'Quick Wins', as follows:

Allowing taxicab operators to park or stand at specific designated hydrant locations;
converting existing 'advisory' courier loading zones to designated delivery vehicle parking zones; and
installing on-street designated motorcycle parking zones in specific designated pay-and-display areas.
 

A companion report, "Curbside Management Strategy - Parking Amendments –Delegated Locations", outlines the required delegated traffic and parking by-law amendments for further locations of specific designated taxicab stand areas, delivery vehicle parking zones and motorcycle parking zones.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the closure of the east sidewalk and a 3.2 metre wide portion of the northbound curb lane on Avenue Road, between a point 20 metres south a Davenport Road and a point 61 metres further south and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the northbound curb lane, from February 7, 2018 to February 7, 2019.

2. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, on the east side of Avenue Road, between a point 15 metres north of Webster Avenue and a point 18 metres further north.

3. City Council enact the parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday; and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, on the east side of Avenue Road, between a point 15 metres north of Webster Avenue and a point 12 metres further north.

4. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday; 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, on the east side of Avenue Road, between a point 55 metres north of Webster Avenue and a point 11 metres further north.

5. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on the east side of Avenue Road, between a point 30.5 metres south of Davenport Road and a point 15 metres north of Webster Avenue.

6. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Avenue Road, between a point 30.5 metres south of Davenport Road to a point 50.5 metres further south.

7. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

8. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

9. City Council direct that Avenue Road be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

10. City Council direct that the construction site daily and nightly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

11. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

12. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

13. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

14. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

15. City Council direct the applicant to establish a construction management working group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Transportation Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, and local Business Improvement Areas.

16. City Council direct the applicant to create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the site.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Avenue Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

Dash Developments is constructing a 10-storey mixed-use development at 143 Avenue Road. The site is located on the south-east quadrant of Avenue Road and Davenport Road.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to close the east sidewalk and the northbound curb lane on Avenue Road for a covered pedestrian walkway for a period of 12 months to accommodate construction staging operations. The developer originally requested a closure for 21 months but Transportation Services is seeking authority for 12 months at this time.  Staff will review the need to extend the duration of the construction staging area and seek authority from City Council if necessary.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the closure of the south sidewalk and a 3.0 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb lane on Davenport Road, between Hazelton Avenue and a point 35 metres west and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane, from February 7, 2018 to February 7, 2019.

2. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday on the north side of Davenport Road, between a point 70 metres east of Avenue Road and a point 90 metres further east.

3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Davenport Road, between a point 70 metres east of Avenue Road and a point 90 metres further east.

4. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect during all times on the south side of Davenport Road, between Hazelton Avenue and a point 27.4 metres west.

5. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday on the south side of Davenport Road, between a point 70 metres east of Avenue Road and Hazelton Avenue.

6. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Davenport Road, between a point 88 metres east of Avenue Road and a point 22 metres further east.

7. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Davenport Road, between a point 70 metres east of Avenue Road and Hazelton Avenue.

8. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

9. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

10. City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site daily and nightly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

11. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

12. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

13. City Council direct the applicant  to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

14. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

15. City Council direct Davenport Road be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

16.  City Council direct the applicant to establish a construction management working group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Transportation Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Building, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, and local Business Improvement Areas.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Davenport Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

Clark Construction Management is constructing a 9-storey condominium building at 128 Hazelton Avenue. The site is located in the south-west corner of Davenport Road and Hazelton Avenue.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to close the sidewalk and a portion of the eastbound lane on the south side of Davenport Road for a covered pedestrian walkway for a period of 12 months to accommodate construction staging operations.  The developer originally requested a closure for 25 months but Transportation Services is seeking authority for 12 months at this time.  Staff will review the need to extend the duration of the construction staging area and seek authority from City Council if necessary.

All of the existing vehicular traffic and bike lanes will be maintained during construction.  Pedestrian operations on Davenport Road abutting the site will be maintained in a covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane.

The west sidewalk and a portion of the northbound lane on Hazelton Avenue also needs to be closed to accommodate the construction staging area for the development. However, this matter is dealt through a companion report "Construction Staging Area - Hazelton Avenue (128 Hazelton Avenue)" requiring Toronto and East York Community Council approval.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the closure of the sidewalk and the a 2.8 metre wide portion of the northbound curb lane on the east side of Bay Street, between Lake Shore Boulevard West and a point 129 metres north and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the northbound curb lane, from February 7, 2018 to February 7, 2019.

2. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on the east side of Bay Street, between Lake Shore Boulevard West and Front Street West.

3. City Council prohibit stopping in effect at all times on the east side of Bay Street, between Lake Shore Boulevard West and a point 129 metres north.

4. City Council rescind the existing standing prohibition in effect at all times between Lake Shore Boulevard West and a point 129 metres north.

5. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

6. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

7. City Council direct that Bay Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

8.  City Council direct that the construction site daily and nightly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

9.  City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

10.  City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to maintain any bike lanes, and install appropriate signage to inform drivers and cyclists of any changes to the cycling lanes.

11.  In areas where no cycling lanes exist, City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to install sharrow markings onto the roadway and display appropriate signage on the hoarding board to inform motorists and cyclist to safely share the road.

12.  City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

13.  City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

14.  City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

15.  City Council direct the applicant to establish a construction management working group that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including Transportation Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, local resident groups, and local BIAs.

16.  City Council direct the applicant to create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the site.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bay Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

EllisDon Corporation is constructing a 48-storey office building at 81 Bay Street (also known as 45 Bay Street). The site is bounded by the Metrolinx Union Station Rail Corridor tracks to the north, an existing residential building (18 Yonge Street) to the east, Lake Shore Boulevard West to the south and Bay Street to the west.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to close the sidewalk and a portion of the northbound lane on the east side of Bay Street for a covered pedestrian walkway for a period of 12 months to accommodate construction staging operations for the development. The developer originally requested a closure for 30 months but Transportation Services is seeking authority for 12 months at this time.  Staff will review the need to extend the duration of the construction staging area and seek authority from City Council if necessary.

All of the existing traffic lanes on Bay Street and Lake Shore Boulevard West will be maintained during construction.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the closure of the south sidewalk and eastbound curb lane on Queen Street East, between Laing Street and a point 83 metres east and provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane, from March 1, 2018 to October 31, 2019.

2. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays on the south side of Queen Street East, between Laing Street and a point 84.2 metres east.

3. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Queen Street East, between Laing Street and a point 84.2 metres east.

4. City Council rescind the existing maximum two-hour parking regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday on the south side of Queen Street East, between Laing Street and a point 84.2 metres east.

5. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Saturday on the south side of Queen Street East, between Laing Street and a point 84.2 metres east.

6. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

7. City Council direct the applicant to work with the STEPS Initiative to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

8. City Council direct that Queen Street East be returned to its pre-construction traffic regulations when the project is completed.

9.  City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site daily and nightly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

10.  City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

11.  City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to maintain any bike lanes, and install appropriate signage to inform drivers and cyclists of any changes to the cycling lanes.

12.  In areas where no cycling lanes exist, City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to install sharrow markings onto the roadway and display appropriate signage on the hoarding board to inform motorists and cyclist to safely share the road.

13.  City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

14.  City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

15.  City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

16.  City Council direct the applicant to create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the site.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Queen Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.

Rockport (Queen & Leslie) Inc. is constructing an 8-storey mixed use development at 1327 Queen Street East. The site is located on the south side of Queen Street East approximately midway between Laing Street and Knox Avenue.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to close the south sidewalk and portion of the eastbound curb lane on Queen Street East for a period of 20 months to set up a construction staging area for the development.  The developer originally requested a closure for 29 months but this was reduced to 20 months through discussions with staff. Pedestrians will be accommodated in a covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane.

The Councillor has requested that a right-of-way occupancy permit for the development be initially issued for 10 months (i.e. March 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018) followed by a review of the construction status to determine if the remainder duration of 10 months (i.e. January 1, 2019 to October 31, 2019) for the lane occupation can be further shortened.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council amend the accessible loading zone on the north side of Wellington Street West between a point 62.3 metres west of Yonge Street and a point 10.1 metres further west, operating at all times to be in effect from a point 71 metres west of Yonge Street and a point 12 metres further west.

2.  City Council amend the standing prohibition on the north side of Wellington Street West between a point 62.3 metres west of Yonge Street and a point 10.1 metres further west, at all times to be in effect from a point 71 metres west of Yonge Street and a point 12 metres further west.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Wellington Street West, between Yonge Street and Bay Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to relocate the existing accessible loading zone fronting No. 18 Wellington Street West further west to prevent the sign poles from being regularly damaged. 

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council authorize the installation of on-street accessible parking spaces at the locations identified in Appendix A attached to the report (December 14, 2017), from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject streets, City Council approval of this report is required.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Danforth Avenue and Woodycrest Avenue.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Danforth Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Danforth Avenue and Woodycrest Avenue.  This installation will provide enhanced safety for pedestrians and motorist at the intersection and is technically justified.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1. City Council approve the alteration of the intersection of Dundas Street East and Coxwell Avenue, including the removal of the right-turn channel at the north-west corner, generally as shown in Attachment 1 to the report (December 6, 2017) from the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services.

Transportation Services is requesting authority to alter the roadway and remove the right-turn channel at the north-west corner of Dundas Street East and Coxwell Avenue. The proposed road alteration will improve pedestrian and cyclist safety, improve pedestrian accessibility, and beautify the reclaimed boulevard space. This work will be completed in 2018 as a stand-alone project to implement geometric and safety intersection improvements.

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on Dundas Street East and Coxwell Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

1.  City Council endorse the requests for extended licensed hours or areas listed below: