City Council

Meeting No.:
38
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Wednesday, December 15, 2021

Thursday, December 16, 2021

Friday, December 17, 2021

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
councilmeeting@toronto.ca
Location:
Video Conference

Meetings of Toronto City Council are being conducted by electronic means and the proceedings of City Council will be conducted publicly. 

 

These measures are necessary to comply with public health guidelines and prevent the spread of COVID-19.

 

Notice to people writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees. The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements: If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a Member of Council must place a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

December 10, 2021

 

toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

Routine Matters - Meeting 38

RM38.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following items at specific times:

On Wednesday, December 15:

Summary

- O Canada

- Moment of Silence

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Mel Lastman
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174459.pdf
Condolence motion for Dr. Robert Bennett
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174617.pdf
Condolence Motion for Ray Biggart
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174545.pdf
Condolence Motion for Christine Connor
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174550.pdf
Condolence Motion for David Fox
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174520.pdf
Condolence Motion for Tom Mangos
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174548.pdf
Condolence Motion for Sylvia Searles Elam
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174546.pdf
Condolence Motion for David Smiley
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174547.pdf
Condolence Motion for Amaresh Tesfamariam
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174551.pdf
Condolence Motion for Raymond Vandette
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174549.pdf

RM38.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on November 9, 10 and 12, 2021.

RM38.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Other Deferred Matter:

 

Item DM38.1

 

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 28 on December 7, 2021

Submitted by Mayor John Tory, Chair

 

Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 32 on December 6, 2021

Submitted by Councillor Joe Cressy, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 25 on November 18, 2021

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 26 on December 6, 2021

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Economic and Community Development Committee from Meeting 26 on December 1, 2021

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the General Government and Licensing Committee from Meeting 27 on November 30, 2021

Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee from Meeting 26 on December 2, 2021

Submitted by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Housing Committee from Meeting 29 on November 25, 2021

Submitted by Councillor Ana Bailão, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 28 on November 22, 2021

Submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 28 on November 23, 2021

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 28 on November 26, 2021

Submitted by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, Chair

  

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 29 on November 24, 2021

Submitted by Councillor Gord Perks, Chair

 

New Business submitted by City Officials 

RM38.4 - Declarations of Interest

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council will declare interests under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act.

RM38.5 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM38.6 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

RM38.7 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Administrative Inquiry and Answer - Meeting 38

IA38.1 - Thomas Clark Way Extension

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All
Attention
The City Manager has submitted an Answer to this Inquiry (IA38.1a).

Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry.

Origin

(December 2, 2021) Letter from Councillor Shelley Carroll, Ward 17, Don Valley North

Summary

Councillor Shelley Carroll has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code S27-61 to seek an update on the status of the assumption and extension of Thomas Clark Way.

Specifically, I am requesting the following:

1. Who is currently responsible for services along the different addresses on Thomas Clark Way?

2. What is the current status of the Thomas Clark Way extension, including the required demolitions, and the plan for the assumption of services?

3. What is the estimated cost and timeline for the extension of Thomas Clark Way?

Background Information

(December 2, 2021) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor Shelley Carroll, Ward 17, Don Valley North on Thomas Clark Way Extension
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-174192.pdf
(December 13, 2021) An Answer from the City Manager on the Thomas Clark Way Extension (IA38.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-174395.pdf

Other Deferred Matter - Meeting 38

DM38.1 - Affordable and Accessible Childcare for All - Update on Federal-Provincial Negotiations - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

(Deferred from November 9, 10 and 12, 2021 - 2021.MM37.13)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* City Council on November 9, 10 and 12, 2021 added this Motion to the agenda. City Council subsequently deferred this Motion to the December 15 and 16, 2021 meeting.
* This Motion is before Council for debate.

Communications have been submitted on this Item.

This item will be considered with Item EC26.16

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services to provide an update to the Economic and Community Development Committee at its meeting scheduled for December 1, 2021:

 

a.  on the status of negotiations with the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada regarding agreements and the flow of funding for the National Childcare Strategy investment announced in the 2021 Federal Budget; and


b.  with options for the City of Toronto to partner directly with the Government of Canada if an agreement is not reached with the Province of Ontario.

Summary

Affordable, accessible, high-quality child care is critical for our pandemic recovery. Parents won't go back to work they can't find space at a child care centre within their budget. This affects women the most, who have long disproportionately shouldered the burden of unpaid labour in the home, who were more likely to stay home while students were learning remotely, and who tend to be employed more often in industries that have been hardest hit by the pandemic.

 

Looking ahead to the recovery, it is more important than ever to help parents get back into the workforce. And over time, these benefits to families and society will pay off with interest: access to safe, high quality child care supports the healthy growth and development of all children.

 

The Government of Canada announced in the spring a commitment to build a national early learning and child care system, and has since signed agreements with eight provinces and territories. Ontario and the Federal Government have yet to sign a deal.

 

This is an urgent matter for Torontonians. We are requesting City staff bring an update to the next meeting of the Economic and Community Development Committee, including options for the City of Toronto to partner directly with the Government of Canada if necessary.

Background Information

Item DM38.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/dm/bgrd/backgroundfile-173799.pdf

Communications

(December 13, 2021) Letter from Neena Locke, Red Apple Day Care (DM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/dm/comm/communicationfile-142589.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Kathryn Firth, Executive Director, Studio 123 Early Learning Centre (DM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/dm/comm/communicationfile-142592.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Teena Nguyen (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Roxanne Futia (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Monika Kostrzewa (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Dawn Strifler (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Lara Conceicao (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Bonnie Wong (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Shannon Reid (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Nashman (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Montsy Bassas-Medeiros (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Claire, Ivan and Ronan Payne (DM.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) Submission from Amy O'Neil, Director, Treetop Children's Centre (DM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/dm/comm/communicationfile-142646.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Rosa Taddeo (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Kim Harding (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Paul Hildebrand (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) Submission from Abigail Doris, Executive Coordinator, Toronto Community for Better Child Care (DM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/dm/comm/communicationfile-142681.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Jane Steinke (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Jackie Boyce (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Tammy Nguyen (DM.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) Submission from Kevin Lawson (DM.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Alizain Husain and Sandra Linero (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Alicia Eads (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Allie Caldwell (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Kasia Gladki and Fraser Page (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Leigh Sandison (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Cullingworth (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Neil Gaitan (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Rosalie Chung (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Megan Wilton (DM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Giacomo Giorgio (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Miriam Selick (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Sari Shawn (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Sophia Lima Oliveira (DM.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Katrina Estey (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Sabrina Malach (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Rachel MacDougall Faussett (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Hollis Pearson (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Tracy Xiong-Morel (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) Submission from Maria Gonzalez (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Gloria Chaim (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Amy Rose (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Murray (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Christina Marie Pacheco (DM.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Erika Del Carmen Fuchs (DM.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Serediak (DM.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Mark Selick (DM.New)
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Annabel Gomizelj, Tegan Nguyen, and Lisa Johnston, Association of Early Childhood Educators Ontario (DM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/dm/comm/communicationfile-142891.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Lu-Anne DaCosta (DM.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Lindsay Beck (DM.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Sanguedolce (DM.New)
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Nicola Maguire (DM.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Aditya Chityala (DM.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Camille Mauger (DM.New)
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Danielle Wittick (DM.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Heather Repton (DM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Collings (DM.Supp)

Executive Committee - Meeting 28

EX28.1 - Toronto Hydro Climate Action Plan and Next Steps

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention

This item will be considered with IE26.16 - TransformTO - Critical Steps for Net Zero by 2040

Confidential Attachment - Information provided by Toronto Hydro Corporation in accordance with Section 4.4 of the Shareholder Direction and contains technical, commercial, financial or labour relations information of Toronto Hydro Corporation; disclosure may reasonably be expected to significantly prejudice Toronto Hydro's competitive position and result in undue loss to Toronto Hydro; any disclosure could give rise to a breach of law, including applicable securities laws.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:   

 

1. City Council as shareholder request Toronto Hydro Corporation, the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services and the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, to continue a collaborative analysis of the Toronto Hydro Climate Action Plan and relevant City strategies and programs to determine specific goals, outcomes, actions and timelines for enabling Toronto’s net zero climate targets, including consideration of the recommendations contained in the letter (December 6, 2021) from Councillor Mike Layton.

 

2. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services and the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and relevant divisions, agencies and stakeholders, in collaboration with Toronto Hydro, to refine the TransformTO spatial and temporal study of climate actions to include probabilistic adoption scenarios (for example, electric vehicles and heat pumps), resulting in corresponding electricity consumption and demand profiles.

 

3.  City Council direct the City Manager to report to City Council by the end of the second quarter of 2022 with respect to the analysis referred to in Part 1 above and the consultation and climate adoption scenarios referred to in Part 2 above, including possible implementation plans starting as early as 2022, and any recommendations regarding new climate action mandates such as a shareholder direction for Toronto Hydro.

 

4. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (November 23, 2021) from the City Manager remain confidential in its entirety, in accordance with Section 4.4 of the Toronto Hydro Shareholder Direction, as it contains technical, commercial, financial or labour relations information of Toronto Hydro Corporation.

Origin

(November 23, 2021) Report from the City Manager

Summary

At City Council's request from its April 7, 2021 meeting, Toronto Hydro Corporation has submitted a report to the City Manager on its current climate action work and opportunities in key areas including electric vehicles, outdoor lighting, renewable energy, energy storage and non-capital sources of revenue.  

 

This report responds to further Council direction that the City Manager report on Toronto Hydro's plan and the role Toronto Hydro has in enabling the City's climate change and equity objectives.

 

Accelerating climate action is essential for the health and prosperity of Toronto and requires all City divisions, agencies and corporations to advance this work.  Toronto Hydro, as the City's wholly-owned electrical distribution company, is a critical enabler of many of the City's climate goals outlined in TransformTO and the staff-recommended Net Zero Strategy, given the significant greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions that can be realized through electrification to displace fossil fuel use in buildings and vehicles. 

 

Toronto Hydro's Climate Action Plan (attached to this report with a cover letter and confidential appendix) offers a positive framework to enable the electrification necessary to achieve net zero emissions. It proposes opportunities that include:

 

- expanding regulated electricity distribution to build a grid that is capable of supporting Toronto’s future zero-emission electricity demand;  
- creating a new, unregulated “Climate Advisory Services” business to facilitate the growth of emerging local clean-tech markets; and 
- making capital investments, focused on modernization of outdoor lighting. 
 

Toronto Hydro submitted its Climate Action Plan to the City Manager on September 30, 2021. City staff have begun reviewing the framework with Hydro, divisions and agencies to determine alignment with the TransformTO Net Zero Strategy and other strategies and programs such as City-run climate advisory services, electric vehicles, and street lighting. Further review of financial, economic, environmental, regulatory and timing risks and opportunities is required. Thorough analysis and due diligence will enable City and Toronto Hydro staff to provide recommendations to City Council and the Toronto Hydro Board regarding any new mandates or shareholder direction to Toronto Hydro, City-funded investments, partnerships and other actions. 

 

The City and Toronto Hydro will continue to collaborate on research and to consider specific investments, programs, policies and other measures to advance the objectives of the Climate Action Plan and a coordinated City-Hydro climate response. This report recommends consideration of specific priority areas and reporting back to Council in Q2 2022 on next steps.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 23, 2021) Report from the City Manager on Toronto Hydro Climate Action Plan and Next Steps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173879.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter from Toronto Hydro President and Chief Executive Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173880.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Hydro Climate Action Plan - submitted to the City Manager on Sep 30, 2021.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173881.pdf
Confidential Attachment 3 - Confidential Climate Action Plan "Appendix H" - submitted to the City Manager on Sep 30, 2021

Speakers

Gabriella Kalapos, Clean Air Partnership
Mark Marmer, Signature Electric
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) Letter from Jan De Silva, President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Region Board of Trade (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-141948.pdf
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Carolyn Kim, Director, Ontario Region Pembina Institute (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-141951.pdf
(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (EX.Supp)
(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Mark Marmer (EX.Supp)
(December 6, 2021) Letter from Bryan Purcell, Vice President of Policy and Programs, The Atmospheric Fund (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-142248.pdf
(December 6, 2021) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 11, University-Rosedale (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-142265.pdf
(December 7, 2021) Letter from Geoffrey Osborne, Director Strategy and Operations, NRStor Inc. (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-142253.pdf

EX28.2 - Final Tax Design and Steps to Implement a Vacant Home Tax in Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the implementation of a Vacant Home Tax of one percent tax of the current value assessment of the residential property on which the vacant unit is located, effective for the 2022 taxation year collectible in the following year, and adopt the final tax design features for the Vacant Home Tax as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (November 23, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.

 

2. City Council appoint the Director, Revenue Services to administer the complaint process, and to receive and make decisions on complaints with respect to the Vacant Home Tax as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (November 23, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.

 

3. City Council appoint the Controller to the role of Appellate Authority as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (November 23, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and to receive, hear and make decisions on appeals with respect to the Vacant Home Tax as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (November 23, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.

 

4. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to allocate net Vacant Home Tax revenues (after deduction of program operating expenditures) towards affordable housing initiatives through the annual operating and capital budget approval process.

 

5. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to:

 

a. promote public awareness of the Vacant Home Tax during 2022; and

 

b. report back during the fourth quarter of 2023 with the findings from the first year of tax collections as part of an annual reporting requirement. 

 

6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill to give effect to the Vacant Home Tax at the next City Council meeting in January, 2022, and to amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code to add the Vacant Home Tax by-law as Chapter 778.

 

7. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to report to the Executive Committee by the second quarter of 2022 with updates on the implementation and projected revenues from the Vacant Home Tax.

Origin

(November 23, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat

Summary

City Council, at its meeting of July 14-16, 2021, considered the report

EX25.3: Recommended Tax Design and Steps to Implement a Vacant Home Tax in Toronto, which provided recommended tax program design elements to be considered as part of a future tax by-law, including annual declaration responsibility of all homeowners, key definitions of vacant homes, principal residence exemptions, other exempting conditions, administrative matters, tax rate, and general information regarding audit and enforcement functions, complaints and appeals process, offences and penalties and annual reporting requirements.

 

The subsequent direction from City Council was to undertake public consultation and receive written feedback and advice from stakeholders on the development of the proposed tax program; and to report back during Q4 2021 with the findings from the consultations and any modifications to a finalized tax design and an enabling tax by-law for Council consideration for implementation on January 1, 2022.

 

This report responds to Council's direction by providing the findings of a public consultation effort conducted in October 2021. Approximately 5,000 residential tenants and property owners responded to a survey seeking feedback on the design of the Vacant Home Tax.  This input affirmed many of the features of the tax proposed in July 2021, and informed other details which are together presented in this report as the final recommended tax design for the Vacant Home Tax. To comply with the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA), the by-law will be presented to City Council for adoption in January 2022 to adopt the recommended Vacant Home Tax.

 

The proposed by-law would become effective on January 1, 2022, with the first annual property declarations in respect of the 2022 taxation being due in 2023.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 23, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat on Final Tax Design and Steps to Implement a Vacant Home Tax in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173763.pdf
Attachment 1 - Final Recommended Tax Design Features
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173764.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 5, 2021) E-mail from Jane Rowan (EX.Supp)

EX28.3 - 2022 Tax Supported Interim Operating and Capital Budget Estimates

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the 2022 Tax Supported Interim Operating Budget Estimates totalling $3.625 billion as detailed by City Program and Agency in Appendix 1 to the report (November 22, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

Origin

(November 22, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The 2022 Tax Supported Operating and Capital Budgets are scheduled for Council approval in mid- February of 2022. The purpose of this report is to establish the 2022 Tax Supported Interim Operating and Capital Estimates in order to enable Tax Supported City Programs and Agencies to have the necessary spending authority to deliver current services, meet existing contractual commitments and to continue work on previously approved capital projects until the 2022 Operating and Capital Budgets are approved by City Council. 

 

It should be noted that no funding for new/enhanced services or new capital projects is included in the recommended 2022 Interim Estimates. Any consideration for new funding is subject to the 2022 Budget process.

 

The 2022 Tax Supported Interim Operating Estimates include $3.625 billion in gross expenditures with a net funding requirement of $3.377 billion. The 2022 Tax Supported Interim Capital Estimates total $1.659 billion, requiring debenture financing of $0.565 billion.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 22, 2021) Report and Appendices 1 and 2 from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on 2022 Tax Supported Interim Operating and Capital Budget Estimates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173774.pdf

EX28.4 - City of Toronto Investment Report for the six month period ending June 30, 2021

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive the report (November 16, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer for information.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the following information:

 

1.  Performance of the Funds for the six month period ending June 30, 2021

2.  General Market Update and Benchmark Performance

3.  City of Toronto Investment Policy and Procedures

 

Short-term volatility due to the pandemic and the economic outlook did create a reversal of some above average results experienced in 2020, especially those with exposures to interest rates.  However, investors with a longer term view and investment horizon, like the City of Toronto, have solid returns over the combined 2-year period ending June 30, 2021.  This 2-year period also marks the anniversary of a majority of the external investment managers that were funded under the purview of the Toronto Investment Board.  Performance of these managers are viewed on a rolling 4-year annualized basis in accordance with the Council adopted Investment Policy.

 

The City's General Group of Funds ("General Fund") holds the City's working capital and amounts designated for the City's reserves and reserve funds.  The Long Term Fund portion of this portfolio managed by external managers returned 5.4% on an annualized basis for the two year period ending on June 30, 2021.  Overall, including the Short Term Fund, the fund had a total return of 0.4 percent for the six month period ending June 30, 2021, and a 2.7 percent total return on a 4-year annualized return basis. These results outperformed the weighted market benchmark by 0.4 percent and 0.3 percent respectively. When the unrealized gains and losses are excluded from the total return, the book return for the General Fund was 1.2 percent (earned $46.4 million) for the six month period ending June 30, 2021. 

 

The City's Sinking Fund portfolio, which holds the investment funds for future debt repayments, saw external investment managers have a 4.1% annualized total return for the two year period ending June 30, 2021.   On a shorter term basis, the fund had a total return of -2.4 percent for the six month period ending June 30, 2021, underperforming the weighted market benchmark by 0.2 percent. When excluding the unrealized market gains and losses, the City's Sinking Fund portfolio earned 1.2% (earned $15.0 million) for the six month period ending June 30, 2021 on an earned income basis.  The customized benchmark index used for this portfolio as required by the Investment Policy does not yet have enough history for the 4-year measurement. 

 

Since January 1, 2018, the City's long-term investments have been managed by the Toronto Investment Board ("Board") under a new Council adopted Investment Policy which is based on the prudent investor standard. The investment portfolios have been progressively phased in to use of the broader range of investments that have become available. Although the overall portfolio risk has been reduced through asset mix diversification, the potential for volatility in total returns over the short term investment horizon still exist while the risk-adjusted total returns over the long term investment horizon are expected to be higher.

 

The Toronto Investment Board completed an asset mix review during the first six months of 2021 given the impact of the pandemic.  The Board decided that neither the asset mix nor changes to the Investment Policy would be required at this time.  It is a legislative requirement that the Investment Policy be provided to City Council, at least annually, for their review.  A copy of the current Investment Policy is included as Attachment 1 to this report which was last adopted by Council in June 2020. 

 

In total, there are now four fixed income managers and four global equity managers engaged in managing the long-term investments under the Toronto Investment Board. Both fixed income and equity investment classes are fully funded in accordance with the target asset mix in the Investment Policy with 70 percent allocated to fixed income and 20 percent to global equities.  As at June 30, 2021, approximately 90 percent of both the Sinking Fund and the Long Term Fund were managed by external fund managers with the remaining 10 percent to be allocated to real assets.  The Board continues to evaluate opportunities in the real asset category.

 

The City's auditor, KPMG LLP, found no exceptions with the compliance to the City's Investment Policy for 2020.   For the first six months of 2021, all funds managed are compliant with the Investment Policy.

 

The Toronto Investment Board is in the process of hiring a third-party data provider in order to monitor and report on whether or not external investment firms hired are compliant with the terms of the Investment Policy governing Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors.  While this process has taken longer than expected due to the pandemic and other unforeseen issues, contract negotiations are currently underway with a vendor for these services.  It is expected this information and data regarding climate change risk from these reviews be available for the next investment report in mid-2022 and will continue to be reported to City Council on a semi-annual basis.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on City of Toronto Investment Report for the six month period ending June 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173767.pdf
Attachment 1 - City of Toronto Statement of Investment Policy and Procedures
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173768.pdf
Attachment 2 - Background on the Funds
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173769.pdf
Attachment 3 - Record of Transactions in City of Toronto Debentures
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173770.pdf
Attachment 4 - Breakdown of the Portfolios by Sectors and by Credit Ratings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173771.pdf

EX28.5 - Property Taxes: 2022 Interim Levy By-Law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1025 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize that the 2022 interim levy for all property classes be based on 50 percent of the total 2021 taxes billed for each property, adjusted, as necessary, to reflect any additional taxes added to the previous year's taxes as a result of assessment added to the tax roll.

 
2. City Council authorize that the interim levy apply to assessments added to the tax roll for 2021 that were not on the assessment roll when the By-law was passed.

 
3. City Council authorize that:

 
a. the interim bill payment due dates for property tax accounts paid on the eleven (11) installment pre-authorized tax payment plan be: February 15, March 15, April 19, May 16 and June 15, 2022;

 
b. the interim bill payment due date for the two (2) installment pre-authorized tax payment plan be March 1, 2022; and

 
c. the interim bill payment due dates for all other property tax accounts on the regular instalment option or on the six (6) instalment pre-authorized tax payment plan be: March 1, April 1 and May 2, 2022.

              
4. City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary Bill in City Council on December 15 and 16, 2021, providing for the levy and collection of the 2022 interim taxes prior to the adoption of the estimates for 2022, which By-law, when enacted, will be effective as of January 1, 2022.

Origin

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report requests Council authority to adopt the necessary by-law to levy interim property taxes for all property classes for 2022 and to prescribe applicable interim bill payment due dates. The 2022 interim levy will raise approximately $2.35 billion for City purposes, and will provide for the cash requirements of the City until such time as the 2022 Operating Budget and 2022 final property tax levy are approved by Council.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Controller on Property Taxes: 2022 Interim Levy By-Law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173773.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (EX.Supp)

EX28.6 - 2022 Rate Supported Budgets - 2022 Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1001 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

Rates and Fees

 

1. City Council adopt:

 

a. effective January 1, 2022, a 3 percent rate increase to the combined water and wastewater consumption rates (paid on or before the due date) charged to metered consumers as shown in the table below and in Appendix B to the report (October 21, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the General Manager, Toronto Water:

 

Annual Consumption

Paid on or before the due date, $/m3

Paid after the due date, $/m3

Block 1 - All consumers of water, including the first 5,000 cubic metres per year consumed by Industrial users ("Block 1 rate")

 

4.2586

4.4827

Block 2 - Industrial process – use water consumption over 5,000 cubic metres per year, representing a 30%   reduction from the Block 1 Rate ("Block 2 rate')

 

2.9809

3.1377

  

b. effective January 1, 2022, an increase of 3 percent to the water and wastewater consumption rates (paid on or before the due date) charged to flat rate consumers, as set out in Appendix B to the report (October 21, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the General Manager, Toronto Water; and

 

c. effective January 1, 2022 the water and wastewater service fees, as set out in Appendix C to the report (October 21, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the General Manager, Toronto Water.

 

2. City Council adopt, with respect to assistance for low-income seniors and low-income disabled persons:

 

a. effective January 1, 2022, the water rebate for eligible low-income seniors and low-income disabled persons be set at a rate of $1.2776 per cubic metre, representing a 30 percent reduction from the Block 1 rate above (paid on or before the due date).

 

3. City Council authorize the necessary amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 441 - Fees and Charges, Municipal Code, Chapter 849 - Water and Sewage Services and Utility Bill, and any other necessary Municipal Code Chapters as may be required, to give effect to City Council's decision.

 

4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary Bills required to give effect to Council's decision and authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, including stylistic, format and organization, minor modifications, technical amendments or by-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the General Manager, Toronto Water.

 

Operating and Capital Budgets

 

5. City Council approve the 2022 Operating Budget for Toronto Water of $471.228 million gross, $1,447.021 million revenue and $975.793 million net for the following services:

 

 

Gross Expenditures

($000s)

Revenue

($000s)

Capital from Current Contribution

($000s)

Water Treatment & Supply

196,749.6

632,947.6

436,198.0

Wastewater Collection & Treatment

230,918.1

803,249.1

572,331.0

Stormwater Management

43,560.4

10,824.2

-32,736.2

Total Program Budget

471,228.1

1,447,020.9

975,792.8

 

6. City Council approve the 2022 staff complement for Toronto Water of 1,883.3 positions composed of 130 capital position and 1,753.3 operating positions.

 

7. City Council approve 2022 Capital Budget for Toronto Water with cash flows and future year commitments totaling $8,001.172 million as detailed by project in Appendix 6a to the 2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Toronto Water.

 

8. City Council approve the 2023-2031 Capital Plan for Toronto Water totalling $7,081.173  million in project estimates as detailed by project in Appendix 6b to the 2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Toronto Water.

 

9. City Council request that all sub-projects with third party financing be approved conditionally, subject to the receipt of such financing in 2022 and if such funding is not forthcoming, their priority and funding be reassessed by City Council relative to other City-financed priorities and needs.

 

Service Levels

 

10. City Council approve the 2022 service levels for Toronto Water as outlined in Appendix 1 to the report (November 3, 2021) from the General Manager, Toronto Water titled "Recommended 2022 Service Levels - Toronto Water".

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This report presents the recommended 2022 water and wastewater consumption rates and service fees arising from the concurrent adoption by City Council of the 2022 Toronto Water Operating and Capital Budgets.

 

In accordance with the City Council 10 year capital plan approved in 2015, this report recommends a 3% water and wastewater consumption rate increase, effective January 1, 2022, and inflationary fee increases for certain existing water and wastewater service fees, reflecting cost recovery for these services. 

 

The recommended 2022 water and wastewater consumption rates and service fees will allow the Toronto Water Program to remain fully self-funded and financially stable, with both operating and capital needs being met without excessive year-over-year fluctuations in pricing over the long term.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee on 2022 Rate Supported Budgets - 2022 Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173530.pdf
(October 21, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the General Manager, Toronto Water on 2022 Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173532.pdf
Appendix A - Summary of 2022 Operating and Capital Budget and Forecast, Corresponding Rate Increase and Capital Financing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173533.pdf
Appendix B - 2022 Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173534.pdf
Appendix C - 2022 Water and Wastewater Service Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173535.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Report and Appendix 1 from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Recommended 2022 Service Levels - Toronto Water
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173559.pdf
2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Toronto Water
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173556.pdf
2022 Report 7C - Toronto Water
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173557.pdf
2022 Report 7C - Toronto Wastewater
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173558.pdf
(October 22, 2021) Briefing Note (BN1) - 2022 Capital Budget Briefing Note - Basement Flooding Protection Program - Program Status Update and Project List - 2022 to 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173775.pdf
(October 15, 2021) Attachment 1 to Briefing Note (BN1) - 2022 Capital Budget Briefing Note - Basement Flooding Protection Program - Program Status Update and Project List - 2022 to 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173740.pdf
(October 15, 2021) Attachment 2 to Briefing Note (BN1) - 2022 Capital Budget Briefing Note - Basement Flooding Protection Program - Program Status Update and Project List - 2022 to 2026
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173743.pdf
Briefing Note (BN5) - 2022 Operating Budget Briefing Note - Toronto Water and Solid Waste Management Services - Community Gardens and Urban Farms
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173776.pdf
Briefing Note (BN6) - 2022 Operating Budget Briefing Note - Toronto Water - Service Levels
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173777.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting - Proposed Amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code for Increases to the Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Certain Water and Wastewater Service Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173778.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 15, 2021) Letter from Ms. A. Pope, Coordinator (Volunteer), Zero Waste Hub Toronto (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142827.pdf

EX28.7 - 2022 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2022 Solid Waste Rates and Fees

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 974 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

Rates and Fees

 

1. City Council adopt, effective January 1, 2022, the Solid Waste Management Services Rates and Fees as set out in Appendix A to the report (November 1, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services.
 

2. City Council authorize that the necessary amendments be made to the Municipal Code Chapter 441 (Fees and Charges) and any other necessary Municipal Code Chapters as may be required to give effect to City Council's decision.
 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary Bills required to give effect to City Council's decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary refinements, including stylistic, format and organization, as may be identified by the City Solicitor, the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services.
 

4. City Council direct that all the rates, fees and charges set out in Appendix A to the report (November 1, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, adopted by Council in Recommendations 1 and 2 above, continue in full force and effect until such time as they are amended or repealed by City Council.
 

5. City Council authorize the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to negotiate and enter into amending agreements with the City's existing contractors providing the sale and distribution of garbage bag tags to extend the contracts for a term ending December 31, 2023, with one optional year to extend and with the provision that the City, in its sole discretion, may end the contract term earlier than the specified end date, and on any other terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and each in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

6. City Council extend the existing authority for the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services or designate, from December 31, 2021 until December 31, 2026, to negotiate and enter into any agreements or related documents necessary to facilitate renewable energy projects from biogas/landfill gas, for the City, including without limitation non-competitive procurement agreements under Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Purchasing), agreements to receive funding, and related amending agreements, on such terms that are acceptable to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 
7. City Council extend the existing authority for the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services or designate, from December 31, 2021 until December 31, 2026, to negotiate and enter into any agreements or related documents necessary to produce, manage, market, distribute, use and sell renewable energy projects, from biogas/landfill gas, resulting from the implementation of Recommendation 6 above and/or the associated environmental attributes, including without limitation non-competitive procurement agreements under Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Purchasing), agreements to receive funding, and related amending agreements, on such terms that are acceptable to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

8. City Council extend the existing authority for the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to continue to administer the First Nations Engagement Grant Fund for the Green Lane Landfill Renewable Energy Study Project funded through the capital program for qualifying local First Nations to retain, on a verified basis, technical services such as energy, environmental and/or similar consultants to assist with the engagement process over the term of the Study, and to negotiate and enter into any necessary agreements for this grant fund on terms and conditions acceptable to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 
9. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, or designate, to negotiate and enter in to any lease agreement, license agreement, easements or similar instruments necessary to implement Recommendations 6 and 7 above where Municipal Code Chapter 213 (Real Property) does not otherwise apply, on terms acceptable to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

Operating and Capital Budgets

 

10. City Council approve the 2022 Operating Budget for Solid Waste Management Services of $377.809 million gross, $390.966 million revenue and $13.157 million net for the following services:

 

Service:

Gross Expenditures

($000s)

Revenue

($000s)

Capital from Current Contribution

($000s)

City Beautification

39,263.0

6,920.0

-32,343.0

Solid Waste Collection & Transfer

134,229.2

342,151.2

207,922.0

Solid Waste Processing & Transport

156,432.7

31,192.0

-125,240.7

Residual Management

40,821.7

10,702.4

-30,119.3

Solid Waste Education & Enforcement

7,061.9

0.3

-7,061.6

Total Program Budget

377,808.5

390.966.0

13,157.5

 

11. City Council approve the 2022 staff complement for Solid Waste Management Services of 1,139.3 positions comprised of 50.6 capital position and 1,088.7 operating positions.

 

12. City Council approve the 2022 new user fees, market rate user fee changes, and other fee changes above the inflationary adjusted rate for Solid Waste Management Services identified in Appendix 9 to the 2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Solid Waste Management Services, for inclusion in the Municipal Code Chapter 441 (Fees and Charges).

 

13. City Council approve 2022 Capital Budget for Solid Waste Management Services with cash flows and future year commitments totaling $625.585 million as detailed by project in Appendix 6a to the 2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Solid Waste Management Services.

 

14. City Council approve the 2023-2031 Capital Plan for Solid Waste Management Services totalling $223.535 million in project estimates as detailed by project in Appendix 6b to the 2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Solid Waste Management Services.

 

Service Levels

 

15. City Council approve the 2022 service levels for Solid Waste Management Services as outlined in Appendix 1 to the report (October 20, 2021) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This report outlines the recommended 2022 Solid Waste Management Services Rates and Fees arising from the adoption of the 2022 Solid Waste Management Services Operating and Capital Budgets. The recommended rate increase is consistent however fee increases will vary based on customer group and are highlighted in Table 1.

 

Table 1 highlights the recommended key Solid Waste Management Services Rates and Fees effective January 1, 2022.

 

Table 1 - 2022 Recommended Rates and Fees Increases (Effective January 1, 2022)

 

Customer Group

% Rate Increase

Comments

 

Multi-Residential

 

3.00%

Maintain service levels and fund Capital Program

Single Family and Residential Units Above Commercial (RUAC)

 

3.00%

Maintain service levels and fund Capital Program

 

Bag Tags, Bin Purchase

 

3.00%

Maintain service levels and fund Capital Program

Commercial, Divisions, Agencies and Corporations, Schools

 

3.00%

Maintain service levels and fund Capital Program

Blended Rate

3.00%

 

 

The recommended three (3) per cent increase in Solid Waste Management Services Rates will provide and maintain Council Approved service levels unchanged from the prior year and fund the 2022 Capital Budget and 10-Year Capital Plan. The $15.546 million increase in 2022 operating expenditures over prior year is attributable to the increase in organic collection and processing costs due to volume and contractual inflation adjustments, increase in the Fleet Reserve contribution as per the vehicle replacement plan, reinstatement of advertising and promotion budgets that were previously reduced due to the prior     year's provincial pandemic shutdown, start-up of the Dufferin Renewable Natural Gas Facility and increase in debt principal and interest payments to fund the 10-Year Capital Budget and Plan.

 

The three (3) per cent utility rate increase for 2022 is recommended to maintain the contribution to Waste Management Reserve fund in line with last year's forecast to finance future capital investments, which include the construction of the third Anaerobic Digester, Landfill Gas Development or Energy from Waste initiatives and Dufferin Waste Facility Site Improvement.

 

The 2022 Operating Budget expenditure is $390.966 million, representing an increase of $11.651 million or 3.1 percent increase over the prior year approved budget including a $13.157 million contribution to the Waste Management Reserve Fund, all of which are offset by total revenues of $390.966 million.

 

The 2022 Capital Budget is $69.729 million including carry-forwards, which is comprised of $63.668 million in new 2022 funding and $6.061 million in funding carried forward from 2021 into 2022. The 2022 Capital Budget and Plan remains generally unchanged from last year focusing on the following key capital objectives and priorities for Solid Waste Management Services:

 

- To safely and efficiently collect materials from 875,000 homes, business and public spaces by implementing Council's direction on health and safety by installing telematics solutions on vehicles in support of Vision Zero 2.0;


- To manage 900,000 plus tonnes of material in an environmentally and fiscally sustainable manner which includes constructing a 3rd Anaerobic Digester to help address organics processing capacity constraints;


- To continue investigating long-term disposal options including landfill capacity development and energy from waste and strategically using alternate landfill sites;


- To continue to develop and invest in renewable energy such as Renewable Natural Gas facilities.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee on 2022 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2022 Solid Waste Rates and Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173551.pdf
(November 1, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on 2022 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2022 Solid Waste Rates and Fees, and Attachments 1 and 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173553.pdf
2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173555.pdf
2022 Report 7C - Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173565.pdf
(October 20, 2021) Report and Appendix 1 from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on Recommended 2022 Service Levels - Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173576.pdf
Briefing Note (BN2) - 2022 Capital Budget Briefing Note - Update on Circular Economy Partnerships Secured in 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173779.pdf
Briefing Note (BN3) - 2022 Operating Budget Briefing Note Solid Waste Management Services - Education and Enforcement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173780.pdf
Revised Briefing Note (BN4) - 2022 Operating Budget Briefing Note - Waste Diversion in City Parks
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173781.pdf
Briefing Note (BN5) - 2022 Operating Budget Briefing Note - Toronto Water and Solid Waste Management Services - Community Gardens and Urban Farms
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173782.pdf
Briefing Note (BN7) - 2022 Operating Budget Briefing Note - Solid Waste Management Services - Service Levels
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173783.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting - 2022 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2022 Solid Waste Rates and Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173784.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - Appendix A - Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 441, Fees and Charges
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173785.pdf

EX28.8 - 2022 Rate Supported Budgets - Toronto Parking Authority

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies or corporations, labour relations or employee negotiations, and personal matters about identifiable individuals, including municipal or local board employees

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that: 

 

Operating and Capital Budgets

 

1. City Council approve the 2022 Operating Budget for Toronto Parking Authority of $105.9 million gross, $120.3 million revenue and ($14.4 million) net for the following services:

 

Service:

Gross Expenditures

($000s)

Revenue

($000s)

Net Expenditures

($000s)

On-Street Parking

10,256.7

45,793.2

(35,536.5)

Off-Street Parking

85,235.1

66,389.6

18,845.5

Bike Share

10,407.9

8,118.4

2,289.5

Total Program Budget

105,899.7

120,301.2

(14,401.4)

 

2. City Council approve the 2022 staff complement for Toronto Parking Authority of 326.5 operating positions.

 

3. City Council approve 2022 Capital Budget for Toronto Parking Authority with cash flows and future year commitments totaling $132.6 million as detailed by project in Appendix 6a to the 2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Toronto Parking Authority.

 

4. City Council approve the 2023-2031 Capital Plan for Toronto Parking Authority totalling $68.9 million in project estimates as detailed by project in Appendix 6b to the 2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Toronto Parking Authority.

 

5. City Council direct the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, in consultation with the President, Toronto Parking Authority, to report to the Budget Committee on an updated Income Sharing Renewal Agreement no later than December 31, 2022.

 

6. City Council request that all sub-projects with third party financing be approved conditionally, subject to the receipt of such financing in 2022 and if such funding is not forthcoming, their priority and funding be reassessed by City Council relative to other City-financed priorities and needs.

 

Service Levels

 

7.  City Council approve the 2022 service levels for Toronto Parking Authority as outlined in Appendix 1 to the report (November 3, 2021) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority.

 

8. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (September 10, 2021) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority remain confidential in its entirety as it pertains to personal matters about identifiable individuals, including municipal or local board employees, and labour relations or employee negotiations, and the security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies or corporations.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This report provides the recommended 2022 Service Levels for Toronto Parking Authority in comparison to service levels planned and achieved from 2019 to 2021.

 

Service levels have historically been presented in the Budget Notes for each Program/Agency for review by Budget Committee and approval by City Council.  Beginning in 2020, as part of the budget modernization project, service levels were provided in a separate document in an effort to deliver a more efficient and simplified budget process that will create greater opportunities for public participation through inclusive and outcome focused budget materials.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee on 2022 Rate Supported Budgets - Toronto Parking Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173577.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Report and Appendix 1 from the President, Toronto Parking Authority on Recommended 2022 Service Levels - Toronto Parking Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173580.pdf
2022 Staff Recommended Capital and Operating Budget Notes - Toronto Parking Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173578.pdf
2022 Report 7C - Toronto Parking Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173579.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - Toronto Parking Authority - 2022 Recommended Operating Budget, 2021 Recommended Capital Budget and 2022-2030 Recommended Capital Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173786.pdf
(September 29, 2021) Letter from the Board of Directors for the Toronto Parking Authority on Toronto Parking Authority - 2022 Operating Budget and 2022-2031 Capital Budget
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173581.pdf
(September 10, 2021) Report from the President, Toronto Parking Authority on Toronto Parking Authority - 2022 Operating Budget and 2022-2031 Capital Budget
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173582.pdf
Attachment 1 - Budget TO 2022 Budget Submission - Toronto Parking Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173583.pdf
Attachment 2 - Off-Street Rate Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173584.pdf
Attachment 3 - On-Street Rate Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173585.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

EX28.9 - Obligatory Reserve Funds (Deferred Revenues) and Reserves and Discretionary Reserve Funds as at September 30, 2021

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1041 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that: 

 

1. City Council approve the establishment of a discretionary reserve fund called the 'Toronto Public Library IT Asset Replacement Reserve Fund' in Appendix B, Schedule 7 - Corporate Discretionary Reserve Funds of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds, the purpose of which is to provide funding to purchase Information Technology equipment for Toronto Public Library as part of the annual replacement cycle for Information Technology equipment, with criteria set out in Appendix G to the report (November 3, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

2. City Council approve the establishment of a Stabilization Reserve called the 'Debt Servicing Stabilization Reserve' in Appendix A, Schedule 3 - Stabilization Reserves of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds, the purpose of which is to reduce the volatility of the City's annual debt service costs, with criteria set out in Appendix H to the report (November 3, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

3. City Council authorize that the name of the 'Sony Centre Facility Fee Reserve Fund' be changed to the 'TO Live Facility Fee Reserve Fund' and that the criteria sheet, reflecting changes to the purpose, and its contribution and withdrawal policies be amended, as outlined in Appendix I to the report (November 3, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and City Council amend Appendix B, Schedule 8 of Chapter 227 to reflect the revised purpose.

 

4. City Council adopt a change in name of the 'Public Health Efficiency Reserve Fund' account to the 'Public Health Reserve Fund', as well as a change to its purpose and criteria as reflected in the revised Criteria Sheet in Appendix J to the report (November 3, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, and City Council amend Appendix B, Schedule 7 of Chapter 227 to reflect the revised name and purpose.

 

5. City Council authorize that the names of the following accounts be changed to be consistent with the change in name of their respective Divisions, and City Council amend the schedules of Chapter 227 as set out in the following table:

 

Existing Reserve Name

Recommended New Reserve Name

Schedule #

E.M.S. - Vehicle Reserve

Toronto Paramedic Services Vehicle Reserve

Schedule 1

E.M.S. - Equipment Reserve

Toronto Paramedic Services Equipment Reserve

Schedule 1

Economic Development, Culture and Tourism Vehicle Reserve

Economic Development and Culture Vehicle Reserve

Schedule 1

Long-Term Care Homes and Services Vehicle Reserve

Seniors Services and Long-Term Care Vehicle Reserve

Schedule 1

Homes for the Aged Stabilization Reserve

Seniors Services and Long-Term Care Stabilization Reserve

Schedule 3

Development Charges - Emergency Medical Services Reserve Fund

Development Charges - Toronto Paramedic Services Reserve Fund

Schedule 11

Homes for the Aged Reserve Fund

Seniors Services and Long-Term Care Reserve Fund

Schedule 13

 

6. City Council direct the following accounts, which have zero balances, be closed and deleted from the Schedules to Chapter 227 as set out in the table to follow.

 

Reserve Account

Beneficial Program

Schedule #

Mayor's Office Vehicle Reserve

Mayor's Office

Schedule 1

 

Sony Centre Stabilization Reserve

TO Live

Schedule 3

Bloor Street Transformation Maintenance Reserve Fund

Transportation Services

Schedule 8

St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Reserve Fund

TO Live

Schedule 8

Modular Housing Reserve Fund

Corporate Real Estate Management

 

Schedule 15

 

7. City Council direct that the balance of the 'Toronto Centre for the Arts Improvement Reserve Fund' in the amount of $213,689.00 be transferred to the 'TO Live Facility Fee Reserve Fund' and it be closed and deleted from Appendix B, Schedule 8 in Chapter 227.

 

8. City Council direct that the balance of the 'Toronto Centre for the Arts Stabilization Reserve' in the amount of $372.76 be transferred to the 'TO Live Facility Fee Reserve Fund' and it be closed and deleted from Appendix A, Schedule 3 in Chapter 227.

 

9. City Council direct that the balance of the 'Water Efficiency Loan Reserve Fund' in the amount of $2,393,277.21 be transferred to the Water Capital Reserve Fund (deferred revenue) and it be closed and deleted from Appendix C, Schedule 16 in Chapter 227.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The City of Toronto (City) maintains balances that are recognized as revenues in future years, in addition to reserves and reserve funds that provide future funding offsets.  This report provides balances for obligatory reserve funds (deferred revenues) and reserves and discretionary reserve funds as at September 30, 2021.

 

In addition, this report requests Council approval for administrative amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds ("Chapter 227"). This includes a request to establish a new reserve and discretionary reserve fund change the names/purposes of a number of reserves and reserve funds to better reflect divisional allocation, and close five reserve/reserve fund accounts and transfer residual balances accordingly.

 

As at September 30, 2021, the City recognized $8,978.8 million in total deferred revenues (obligatory reserve funds) and discretionary reserve funds, an increase of $1,393.0 million from the December 31, 2020 balance of $7,585.8 million. These balances are subject to annual changes based on receipts from third parties, recognition of amounts into revenue based on third party agreements and revenue recognition principles and transfers between funds, based on Council approvals. A total of 97.1 percent of the City's deferred revenues and reserves are fully committed, with the breakdown of the total balance as follows:


- Committed funds included in the City's reserves, or in support of legislated, contractually bound or Council-directed activities ($8,059.6 million);


- Committed funds to fund capital costs and pressures on rate-based activities ($655.5 million);


- Uncommitted funds of $263.7 million, or 2.9 percent of the total balance, to respond to various unanticipated costs and to stabilize various funding sources, including the tax base.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee on Obligatory Reserve Funds (Deferred Revenues) and Reserves and Discretionary Reserve Funds as at September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173638.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Obligatory Reserve Funds (Deferred Revenues) and Reserves and Discretionary Reserve Funds as at September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173639.pdf
Appendix A - Obligatory Reserve Funds (Deferred Revenues) as of September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173656.pdf
Appendix B - Reserves as of September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173657.pdf
Appendix C - Discretionary Reserve Funds as of September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173658.pdf
Appendix D - Loan Receivable Balances - Obligatory Reserve Funds (Deferred Revenues) as of September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173640.pdf
Appendix E - Loan Receivable Balances - Reserves as of September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173642.pdf
Appendix F - Loan Receivable Balances - Discretionary Reserve Funds as of September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173643.pdf
Appendix G - Recommended Criteria Sheet for the Toronto Public Library Information Technology Asset Replacement Reserve Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173644.pdf
Appendix H - Recommended Criteria Sheet for the Debt Servicing Stabilization Reserve
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173645.pdf
Appendix I - Recommended Criteria Sheet for the TO Live Facility Fee Reserve Fund Reserve Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173659.pdf
Appendix J - Recommended Criteria Sheet for the Public Health Reserve Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173660.pdf

EX28.10 - Capital Variance Report for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve in-year budget adjustments to the 2021-2030 Approved Capital Budget and Plan as detailed in Appendix 4 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This is to advise that prior to Budget Committee on November 19, 2021, a Capital Variance Report for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, with additional analysis and recommendations will be submitted for consideration. Due to accelerating the agenda to ensure 2022 rate budget materials are publicly shared and to the additional complexity associated with analyzing financial implications of COVID-19, additional time is required to provide detailed review and analysis for the variance reports, in advance of the Budget Committee meeting.

 

The Capital Variance Report will contain capital spending results for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 as well as projected expenditures to December 31, 2021. The report will also request City Council's approval for in-year budget adjustments to the 2021 Approved 2021-2030 Capital Budget and Plan.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee on Capital Variance Report for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173575.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Capital Variance Report for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173596.pdf
(November 19, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Capital Variance Report for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173597.pdf
Appendix 1 - 2021 Capital Variance and Projection Summary for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173598.pdf
Appendix 2A - 2021 Third Quarter Capital Projects Recommended for Full Closure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173599.pdf
Appendix 2B - 2021 Third Quarter Capital Projects Recommended for Partial Closure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173600.pdf
Appendix 3 - 2021 Third Quarter Major Capital Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173601.pdf
Appendix 4 - In-Year Adjustments for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173602.pdf
Appendix 5 - 2021 Third Quarter Capital Variance Dashboard by Program and Agency
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173603.pdf

EX28.11 - Operating Variance Report for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that: 

 

1. City Council approve the budget adjustments and any associated complement changes detailed in Appendix D1 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to amend the 2021 Approved Operating Budget with no impact on the Net Operating Budget of the City, and City Council approve the expenditure authority as detailed in Appendix D2 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This is to advise that prior to Budget Committee on November 19, 2021, an Operating Variance Report for the nine months ended September 30, 2021, with additional analysis and recommendations will be submitted for consideration. Due to accelerating the agenda to ensure 2022 rate budget materials are publicly shared and to the additional complexity associated with analyzing financial implications of COVID-19 on operations, additional time is required to provide detailed review and analysis in advance of the Budget Committee meeting.

 

The Operating Variance Report will contain operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 as well as projections to year-end. The report will also request City Council's approval for required amendments to the 2021 Approved Operating Budget that have no impact on the City's 2021 Approved Net Operating Budget.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Letter from the Budget Committee on Operating Variance Report for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173604.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Operating Variance Report for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173605.pdf
(November 19, 2021) Report and Appendices A to E from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Operating Variance Report for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173587.pdf

Speakers

Derek Moran

Communications (Committee)

(November 11, 2021) E-mail from Jacques Charbin (EX.Main)
(December 7, 2021) E-mail from Derek Moran (EX.Supp)

EX28.12 - Metrolinx Subways Program - Real Estate Protocol and Land Valuation Principles for Subways and GO Expansion Programs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1027 has been submitted on this Item. .

To be considered after Item EX28.14

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to finalize negotiations and enter into and execute a Real Estate Protocol with Metrolinx and the Toronto Transit Commission for the Subways Program no later than February  28, 2022, or such other date as agreed to by the parties, based on the terms outlined in the report (November 23, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and to enter into any such ancillary or related agreements, amendments, extensions and renewals as may be necessary, all on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and any other relevant Official, in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to submit the necessary Bill(s) to amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 213, Real Property to include the Ontario Line, Scarborough Subway Extension, the Eglinton Crosstown West Extension and the Yonge North Subway Extension to the definition of "Transit Projects".

 

3. City Council delegate authority to each of the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the Director, Transaction Services, severally, to approve the disposal to Metrolinx and the use by Metrolinx of certain City lands required by Metrolinx for the Subways Program (the "City Subway Lands"), including surface and subsurface public highway, for nominal consideration, provided that such disposal is:

 

a. at no net operating cost to the City, and/or the Toronto Transit Commission at the time of disposition, which would include, but not limited to, relocation costs, lost revenues or other out of pocket costs;

 

b. of lands are not required for municipal purposes (current and future) as already identified by the City in its ten year capital plan, as same may be amended from time to time; and

 

c. subject to existing City and Toronto Transit Commission infrastructure and assets and third party utility rights.

 

4. With respect to the City Subway Lands designated as Public Highway, City Council authorize the permanent closure of any City Subway Lands that are not otherwise required to continue to be designated as public highways and exempt these lands from the requirements of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162, Public Notice.

 

5. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the Director, Transaction Services, severally, to utilize the land valuation principles set out in Attachment 2 for the City Subway Lands required by Metrolinx, and, notwithstanding Item 2020.EX16.4, to utilize the same land valuation principles set out in Attachment 2 to the report (November 23, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management for City lands required by Metrolinx for its GO Expansion Program.

 

6. City Council authorize severally each of the Managers in Transaction Services, Corporate Real Estate Management to approve and execute nominal sum licence agreements, Omnibus Permission to Enter Agreements or further amending agreements to Omnibus Permission to Enter Agreements with Metrolinx to authorize the use of any City-owned or managed property required by Metrolinx to perform due diligence work to facilitate the Subways Program or the GO Expansion Program, on the same terms and conditions as the original Omnibus Permission to Enter Agreement and such additional and/or amended terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Director, Transaction Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and to waive the City’s administrative fee for each new or amending agreement pursuant to Chapter 441 of the Toronto Municipal Code.

 

7. City Council forward this report to the Toronto Transit Commission Board for information.

Origin

(November 23, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

This report seeks City Council authority to execute a Real Estate Protocol (the "Protocol") for the Province of Ontario's priority transit projects (the "Subways Program") based on the terms outlined in this report.

 

The Subways Program delivered by Metrolinx represents a significant investment towards transit expansion within the City of Toronto. The Subways Program includes the Ontario Line, the Scarborough Subway Extension, the Eglinton Crosstown West Extension and the Yonge North Subway Extension.

 

To support the delivery of the Province's Subways Program on an accelerated basis, Metrolinx requires interests, both on a temporary and permanent basis, in certain City real property (the "City Subway Lands"). City, Toronto Transit Commission ("T.T.C.") and Metrolinx staff have been working closely to establish terms that govern the access, acquisition, ownership and disposition of real property between the parties. This report outlines those terms and also notes the processes to be followed by Metrolinx to facilitate City and T.T.C. review of City infrastructure to be built on City Subway Lands and other lands to be transferred to the City, and review of Subways Program infrastructure as it relates to City assets and infrastructure. The protocol includes a process for the parties to develop a Commissioning and Acceptance Protocol for City infrastructure.

 

Staff are recommending the Protocol be executed, in advance of the conclusion of negotiations currently underway with the Province on a Subways Program Term Sheet ("Term Sheet"), and ultimately the negotiation of a Subways Master Agreement ("Subways Master Agreement") between the City, T.T.C. and Metrolinx, as Metrolinx requires land for the Subways Program sooner than these documents can be negotiated and executed.

 

City staff anticipate reporting back to City Council in 2022 on the conclusion of the negotiation of the Term Sheet and to seek approval to negotiate and execute a Subways Master Agreement based on the terms of the Term Sheet. The Protocol will ultimately form part of the Subways Master Agreement. The Protocol provides that the Term Sheet being negotiated with the Province, if approved by Council, will take precedence over this Protocol should there be any inconsistencies.

 

In the absence of the Protocol, Metrolinx has and would continue to pursue City property through the Expropriations Act.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 23, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Metrolinx Subways Program - Real Estate Protocol and Land Valuation Principles for Subways and GO Expansion Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173856.pdf
Attachment 1 - Subway Real Estate Protocol Major Terms and Conditions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173857.pdf
Attachment 2 - Land Valuation Principles
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173858.pdf

EX28.13 - Parkdale Hub Project - Advancing to Phase Three

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to include the creation of replacement space for Toronto Artscape Inc. within the residential block(s) of the proposed Parkdale Hub development, including nine live-work units, an art gallery and community space.


2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, to initiate lease negotiations with Toronto Artscape Inc. to secure the ongoing delivery of their program within the proposed Parkdale Hub.


3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, to continue negotiations to acquire fee simple interest in the property municipally known as 1337 Queen Street West, as listed in Appendix A to the report (November 23, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and shown on the maps attached as Appendix B to the report (November 23, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management (the "Property"), and City Council authorize the initiation of expropriation proceedings for the Property, for the purposes of affordable housing units and operating space for community-based organizations, programs and services.


4. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the property municipally known as 1337 Queen Street West, to forward to the Ontario Land Tribunal any requests for inquiries received, to attend the hearing(s) to present the City of Toronto's position, and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for its consideration.

 

5. City Council authorize the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the City Librarian, Toronto Public Library and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to lead Phase 3 of the Parkdale Hub project, which will include:

 

a. preparation of design documents suitable to support a City-initiated rezoning process for the Parkdale Hub, including the Housing Now site(s), based on the Demonstration Plan prepared in Phase 2;

 

b. the submission of a business case for the future Housing Now site(s) to the CreateTO Board; and

 

c. the competitive procurement of a non-profit affordable rental housing development partner.

 

6. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachments 1, 2 and 3 to the report (November 8, 2021) from the Vice President, Land and Development Planning, CreateTO following the closing of all purchase and/or sale and/or transaction(s), as they pertain to a proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes and a position, plan, or instruction to be applied to negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto.

Origin

(November 23, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority for City Staff to take the necessary actions to advance the Parkdale Hub project to Phase three. On November 22, 2021, the CreateTO Board adopted RA27.6 (the "CreateTO Board Report") that presented the Feasibility Study (Phase two) for the Parkdale Hub project and recommended that, subject to City Council approval, CreateTO lead Phase three of the Parkdale Hub project in collaboration with Corporate Real Estate Management, City Planning, Housing Secretariat, Parks, Forestry & Recreation, Toronto Public Library, and Social Development, Finance & Administration. Details of Phase two, including the Feasibility Study as well as an overview of the work program for Phase three are presented in the CreateTO Board Report and its Confidential Attachments.

 

This report also seeks authority to initiate expropriation proceedings for a fee simple interest the property municipally known as 1337 Queen Street West (the "Property") for the purposes of new affordable housing and community program space.

 

The Parkdale Hub project is a strategic city-building initiative, and therefore it is appropriate that this City companion report and the CreateTO Board Report be considered jointly by Executive Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 23, 2021) Report and Appendices A and B from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Parkdale Hub Project - Advancing to Phase Three
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173765.pdf

13a - Parkdale Hub Project - Completion of Phase 2 Feasibility Study, Advancing to Phase 3

Confidential Attachment - Proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto, and a position, plan, or instruction to be applied to negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto
Origin
(November 22, 2021) Letter from the Board of Directors of CreateTO
Summary

At its meeting on November 22, 2021, the Board of Directors of CreateTO considered Item RA27.6 and made recommendations to City Council.

 

Summary from the report (November 8, 2021) from the Vice President, Land and Development Planning, CreateTO:

 

The purpose of this report is to provide the Board with an overview of the findings and recommendations of the Feasibility Study (Phase 2) for the Parkdale Hub project. CreateTO staff have been leading this work in collaboration with City divisional partners, at the direction of City Council. This report follows an initial information report and presentation to the CreateTO Board introducing the Parkdale Hub project at its meeting on May 11, 2021.

 

This project represents a strong opportunity for CreateTO to lead a transformational city-building initiative that will deliver wide-ranging social, cultural and economic benefits to the Parkdale community, including:

 

- The creation of new non-profit affordable rental housing;

 

- The revitalization and expansion of the Masaryk-Cowan Community Recreation Centre;

 

- The reconstruction and expansion of the Parkdale Library branch;

 

- The ongoing delivery of Artscape’s cultural hub program, which includes affordable live-work residences for artists;

 

- The creation of new community space and design elements that will strategically connect programs, services and people – creating an integrated “Hub”; and

 

- Significant enhancements to the public realm and the adaptive re-use of heritage buildings and improved connectivity with the adjacent properties.

The second phase of the Feasibility Study included advancing architectural design work, a construction phasing strategy, environmental due diligence, negotiations for a strategic property acquisition, a preliminary civil engineering assessment, high-level costing analysis, and ongoing community and stakeholder engagement. The results of these activities are presented in this report and its attachments. Based on these findings, staff recommend that the project advance into Phase 3 - which would include a City-led rezoning process, the submission of a project business case to the CreateTO Board, and a competitive call for a non-profit housing development partner (led by the Housing Secretariat).

Background Information (Committee)
(November 22, 2021) Letter from the Board of Directors of CreateTO on Parkdale Hub Project - Completion of Phase 2 Feasibility Study, Advancing to Phase 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173689.pdf
(November 8, 2021) Report from the Vice President, Land and Development Planning, CreateTO on Parkdale Hub Project - Completion of Phase 2 Feasibility Study, Advancing to Phase 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173690.pdf
Attachments 1 to 3 - Demonstration Plan, Heritage Strategy and Construction Phasing Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173691.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Additional Property Details
Confidential Attachment 2 - Preliminary Financial Analysis
Confidential Attachment 3 - Adding Residential Uses to the Centre Block

EX28.14 - Ontario Line Downtown Stations - Temporary Road Closures and Community Impacts

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
10 - Spadina - Fort York, 13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Communications have been submitted on this Item..

To be considered after Item PH29.3

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council approve the temporary road closures for the Ontario Line King-Bathurst Station, as per the following details:

 

a. temporary closure of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic and a portion of the northbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Bathurst Street, between King Street West and Stewart Street, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

b. temporary closure of the south sidewalk to pedestrian traffic and eastbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on King Street West, between Bathurst Street and a point 37 metres east, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

c. temporary closure of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic and northbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Bathurst Street, between King Street West and a point 38 metres north, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

d. temporary closure of the north sidewalk to pedestrian traffic and westbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on King Street West, between Bathurst Street and a point 45 metres east, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

e. temporary closure of the north sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Stewart Street, between Bathurst Street and a point 32 metre east, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029; and

 

f. temporary closure of a portion of the eastbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Stewart Street, between Bathurst Street and a point 36 metres east, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to require the provision of temporary pedestrian walkways as a condition of permit, at the Ontario Line King-Bathurst Station, as per the following details:

 

a. provide a temporary 1.8 metres wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the northbound curb lane on Bathurst Street, between King Street West and Stewart Street, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

b. provide a temporary 2.1 metres wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane on King Street West, between Bathurst Street and a point 37 metres east, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

c. provide a temporary 1.8 metres wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the northbound curb lane on Bathurst Street, between King Street West and a point 38 metres north, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

d. provide a temporary 2.1 metres wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane on King Street West, between Bathurst Street and a point 45 metres east, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029; and

 

e. provide a temporary 1.8 metres wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane on Stewart Street, between Bathurst Street and a point 36 metres east, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

3. City Council approve the traffic regulation amendments associated with the Ontario Line King-Bathurst Station and authorize the requisite associated amendment to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters 910, Parking Machines and Meters, Chapter 925, Permit Parking and Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as listed in Attachment B to the report (November 23, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

4. City Council direct that King Street, Bathurst Street and Stewart Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the Ontario Line project is complete.

 

5. City Council approve the temporary road closures for the Ontario Line Queen-Spadina Station, as per the following details:

 

a. temporary closure of the south sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Queen Street West, between Spadina Avenue and a point 53 metres west, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

b. temporary closure of the eastbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Queen Street West, between Spadina Avenue and a point 83 metres west, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029; and

 

c. temporary closure of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic and curbside parking lane to vehicular traffic on Spadina Avenue, between Queen Street West and Bulwer Street, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

6. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to require the provision of temporary pedestrian walkways as a condition of permit at the Ontario Line Queen-Spadina Station, as per the following details:

 

a. provide a temporary 2.1 metres wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane on Queen Street West, between Spadina Avenue and a point 53 metres west, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029; and

 

b. provide a temporary 2.1 metres wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the curbside parking lane on the east side of Spadina Avenue, between Queen Street West and Bulwer Street from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

7. City Council approve the traffic regulation amendments associated with the Ontario Line Queen-Spadina Station and authorize the requisite associated amendment to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, and Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as listed in Attachment B to the report (November 23, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

8. City Council direct that Queen Street and Spadina Avenue be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when construction of the Ontario Line project is complete.

 

9. City Council approve the temporary lane closures for the Ontario Line Osgoode Station, as per the following details:

 

a. temporary closure of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on University Avenue, between Queen Street West and a point 110 metres north, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

b. temporary closure of the northbound bike lane to cyclists on University Avenue, between Queen Street West and a point 122 metres north, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

c. temporary closure of the northbound auxiliary lane to vehicular traffic on University Avenue, between Queen Street West and a point 102 metres north, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

d. temporary closure of the southbound innermost median lane to vehicular traffic on University Avenue, between a point 17 metres north of Queen Street West and a point 63 metres further north, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

e. temporary closure of the west sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Simcoe Street, between Queen Street West and the public laneway south of Queen Street West, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029; and

 

f. temporary closure of an 8.4 metre wide portion of the southbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on the west side of Simcoe Street, between Queen Street and Richmond Street, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

10. City direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to require the provision of temporary pedestrian walkways and bike lanes as a condition of permit at the Ontario Line Osgoode Station, as per the following details:

 

a. provide a temporary 2.1 metres wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the northbound bike lane on University Avenue, between Queen Street West and a point 110 metres north, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

b. provide a temporary 2.0 metres wide northbound bike lane in the realigned northbound lanes on the east side of University Avenue, Queen Street West and a point 122 metres north, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

c. provide a temporary 2.1 metres wide pedestrian walkway on the east side of Simcoe Street, between Queen Street West and Richmond Street, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029; and

 

d. provide a 1.5 metres wide bike lane on the east side of Simcoe Street, between Queen Street West and Richmond Street West, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

11. City Council approve the traffic regulation amendments associated with the Ontario Line Osgoode Station and authorize the requisite associated amendment to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, and Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as listed in Attachment B to the report (November 23, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

12. City Council direct that University Avenue and Simcoe Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when construction of the Ontario Line project is complete.

 

13. City Council approve the temporary road closures for the Ontario Line Queen Station, as per the following details:

 

a. temporary full road closure to vehicular traffic on Queen Street West, between Bay Street and Yonge Street, and on Queen Street East, between Yonge Street and Victoria Street, from May 1, 2023 to November 30, 2027;

 

b. temporary closure of a portion of the south sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Queen Street East, between Victoria Street and a point 20 metres west, from May 1, 2023 to November 30, 2027;

 

c. temporary full road closure to vehicular traffic on James Street, between Queen Street West and Albert Street, from May 1, 2023 to November 30, 2027;

 

d. temporary closure of a portion of the east sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on James Street, between Queen Street West and a point 43 metres north, from November 1, 2025 to November 30, 2027; and

 

e. temporary closure of the southbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Victoria Street, between a point 41 metres north of Queen Street East and a point 19 metres south of Queen Street East, from May 1, 2023 to November 30, 2027.

 

14. City Council authorize the conversion of Albert Street, between Bay Street and James Street, to a two-way traffic operation and authorize the associated amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, Chapter 903, Parking for Persons with Disabilities and Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as listed in Attachment B to the report (November 23, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

15. City Council approve the permanent installation of additional streetcar tracks in the westerly middle lane on York Street, between Queen Street West and Adelaide Street  West, to accommodate TTC 501 Queen streetcar detour during the Ontario Line Queen Station construction and provide ongoing streetcar network resilience and authorize the associated amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, and Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as listed in Attachment B to the report (November 23, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

16. City Council approve the installation of westerly southbound cycle track in effect at all times on York Street, between Richmond Street West and King Street West and amend Schedule E, Cycle Tracks, to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 886, Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks.

 

17. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services to negotiate and enter into and execute an agreement, including all amendments and renewals and ancillary agreements, with Metrolinx and TTC for the delivery of work on York Street and Adelaide Street for the purposes of facilitating the installation of the TTC 501 streetcar detour tracks as part of the Ontario Line Project, substantially in accordance with terms and conditions set out in the report (November 23, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

18. City Council approve the temporary closure of the north sidewalk to pedestrian traffic and westbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Queen Street East, between Sherbourne Street and George Street, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029 for the purposes of the Ontario Line Moss Park Station construction.

 

19. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to require, as a condition of permit, the provision of a 2.1 metre wide temporary pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane on Queen Street East, between Sherbourne Street and George Street, from October 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

20. City Council approve the traffic regulation amendments associated with the Ontario Line Moss Park Station and authorize the requisite associated amendment to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 910, Parking Machines and Meters, and Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as listed in Attachment B of the report (November 23, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

21. City Council direct that Queen Street East be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when construction of the Ontario Line project is complete.

 

22. City Council approve the temporary road closures for the Ontario Line Corktown Station, as per the following details:

 

a. temporary closure of the south sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on King Street East, between Berkeley Street and a point 30 metres west of Parliament Street, from September 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

b. temporary closure of the eastbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on King Street East, between Berkeley Street and a point 30 metres west of Parliament Street, from September 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029;

 

c. temporary closure of the west sidewalk to pedestrian traffic on Parliament Street, between a point 30 metres south of King Street East and a point 44 metres further south, from September 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029; and

 

d. temporary closure of the southbound curb lane to vehicular traffic on Parliament Street, between a point 5 metres south of King Street East and a point 5 metres north of Front Street East, from September 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

23. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to require the provision of temporary pedestrian walkways as a condition of permit at the Ontario Line Corktown Station, as per the following details:

 

a. provide a temporary 2.1 metre wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound curb lane on King Street East, between Berkeley Street and a point 64 metres east, from October 1, 2024 to November 30, 2029; and

 

b. provide a temporary 2.1 metre wide pedestrian walkway within the closed portion of the southbound curb lane on Parliament Street, between a point 5 metres south of King Street East and a point 5 metres north of Front Street East, from September 1, 2022 to November 30, 2029.

 

24. City Council approve the traffic regulation amendments associated with the Ontario Line Corktown Station and authorize the requisite associated amendment to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as listed in Attachment B to the report (November 23, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

25. City Council direct that King Street East and Parliament Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when construction of the Ontario Line project is complete.

 

26. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to include  the following as a condition of the permits for the long term road closures detailed in Recommendations 1, 5, 9, 13, 18 and 22 above:

 

a. install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for nighttime illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the City Staff, Ward Councillor and local Business Improvement Area;

 

b. pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and ensure safe passage for all road and sidewalk users;

 

c. provide appropriate lighting on the existing sidewalks and the proposed pedestrian walkways to ensure safety and visibility of pedestrians at all times;

 

d. consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local Business Improvements Areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications;

 

e. install appropriate signage, including  converging mirrors, temporary routes and/or safe diversion routes as necessary, to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times;

 

f. establish a construction management hub that meets monthly and invite local stakeholders including City Staff, neighbourhood associations, local Business Improvement Area and Ward Councillor office; and

 

g. create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the site of each Ontario Line Station.

  

27. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bills to give effect to City Council's decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or by-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor or General Manager, Transportation Services, in order to give effect to Parts 1 to 26 above.

 

28. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to implement all measures to manage construction sites with the least impact to traffic, including time of day and direction of travel restrictions, and flexible work zone setups.

 

29. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to include, in future reports, information on what is being done to maintain and advance time availability of its surface fleet in the construction area, in particular, streetcars. 

 

30. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to engage with Metrolinx and establish criteria/requirements that can be shared with Proponents on the Ontario Line and all other MX transit expansion projects that mitigate traffic and transit impacts, and require Proponents to coordinate construction activities that impact traffic with City staff.

 

31. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to engage with Metrolinx and the successful Proponents on options to reduce the duration of construction and road closures associated with the Ontario Line.

 

32. City Council direct the City Manager to host Senior Executives from utility companies to reaffirm the City's direction to reduce overall construction schedules and restrict work in active lanes of traffic to off-peak hours.  

  

33. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to refresh training with staff, contractors and external partners such as Metrolinx on proper work zone set ups including the necessary planning and schedule of activities that are required to manage the work zone, which may include items such as implementation of advanced signage, and timely removal of work zone equipment as soon as possible.

 

34. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to move forward on technology improvements that will assist with longer term capital planning, while also supporting the review and coordination of utility "short stream" and private development lane occupancy applications, and developing Key Performance Indicators to track progress over time that can be communicated to the public.

 

35. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to engage a third party review of best practices in comparable cities related to construction zone management, capital program planning and delivery, traffic modeling and mitigation and perform a peer review of the current City of Toronto construction coordination activities and recommend both short term and long term process improvements.

  

36. City Council request Metrolinx to pay the full costs for the additional traffic mitigation positions needed to manage the Ontario Line project.

 

37. City Council direct the City Manager and the General Manager, Transportation Services to report on road safety impacts for vulnerable road users through the downtown and report back to the March 30, 2022 meeting of the Executive Committee, such report to include but not limited to:

 

a. bike lanes, cycle tracks, and connection;

 

b. sidewalks and pedestrian pathways;

 

c. priority signals for transit; and

 

d. advance and clear communication to the local community.

 

38. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to include a requirement for Paid-Duty Officers and/or Traffic Agents and/or Trained Traffic Control Persons at each construction site to facilitate safe passage for all, especially vulnerable road users.

 

39. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to record and monitor traffic counts and movement, public safety at intersections and sidewalks, all complaints and resolutions, and to report back on findings and additional recommendations for adjustments on a bi-annually basis to the Toronto and East York Community Council with a written quarterly update to the local Councillor's office, to include but not limited to:


a. vehicle movements, and travel patterns;

 

b. pedestrian counts; and

 

c. cyclist movements and travel patterns.

 

40. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to request an annotated traffic management plan from Metrolinx following the procurement process or approvals from the City of Toronto, including but not limited to:

 

a. construction vehicle travel paths to and from the site, and pick-up locations;

 

b. cycling connections; and

 

c. pedestrian movements.

 

41. City Council direct the City Manager, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion to request that Metrolinx require Project Co to ensure timely responsive service to local residents and stakeholders with respect to each construction site and report back to the March 30, 2022 meeting of the Executive Committee, including:


a. actively patrol each construction site;

 

b. be available 24 hours, 7 days a week; and

 

c. provide real-time response to complaints raised by residents and local stakeholders.

 

42. City Council request Metrolinx, in consultation with the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to develop a framework of subsidizing and reimbursing businesses impacted by the construction of the Ontario Line in an effort to support downtown recovery, including but not limited to:

 
a. commercial rent subsidies;

 

b. deferring, delaying, or adjusting property tax rates;

 

c. something signage and wayfinding; and

 

d. advertising in all major media outlets and social media.

 

43. City Council request Metrolinx, in consultation with the City Manager, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Business Improvement Areas, to design and broadly promote a Support the Downtown campaign wherein residents and visitors to the downtown can enjoy rebates, subsidies, financial discounts when they shop at businesses impacted by the Ontario Line construction.

 

44. City Council direct the City Manager, the General Manager Transportation Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, in consultation with local Business Improvement Areas and the Ward Councillor, to explore enhanced streetscape improvements to the right of way as part of the construction of the Ontario Line, to be funded by Metrolinx and the Province of Ontario.

 

45. City Council request Metrolinx, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, to work with local Business Improvement Areas, Urban Design and the Ward Councillor to minimize disruption and beautify the road closures during the multi-year construction period, funded by Metrolinx and the Province of Ontario, including but not limited to:


a. public art;

 

b. planters and other barriers that are not concrete; and

 

c. any other additions to improve pedestrian wayfinding and user experience.

 

46. City Council direct the General Manager Transportation Services to establish a Construction Hub in the downtown area to be led by a Senior Project Manager who will ensure coordination between Metrolinx works, City-led projects, private developer works, and utility works and report annually to City Council.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Manager, Transportation Services gave a presentation on the Ontario Line Downtown Stations – Temporary Road Closures and Impacts.

Origin

(November 23, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Province of Ontario through its Agency Metrolinx will deliver the Ontario Line, a 15.6 kilometre long, 15-stop fully-automated rapid transit system between Ontario Science Centre and Exhibition Place. When completed, this new transit line will provide relief to the TTC Line 1 Yonge-University and other busy transit routes across the City.

 

The project is currently in P3 (Project Co.) procurement stage for the south segment of the Line, which extends from Don River to Exhibition Place. Construction of the tunnel and stations is expected to start in the summer of 2022 and be complete in about 7 years. Metrolinx has completed constructability assessments for the King-Bathurst, Queen-Spadina, Osgoode, Queen, Moss Park and Corktown stations and provided details of construction plans, long-term road closures, impacts and mitigation measures. City staff have worked closely with Metrolinx staff to review the construction plans and strategies to seek to minimize construction impacts on the community and road users.

 

This report provides an overview of early works and station construction related temporary road closures at each of the six downtown stations and its impacts on the community and road users including pedestrians, cyclists and transit users. The temporary road closures discussed in this report are the maximum permitted for the proponents in the procurement stage. The Project Co. procurement process incentivizes the proponents to reduce the number and duration of road closures. Therefore, it is expected that the successful proponent design would require fewer temporary road closures during construction than discussed in this report, resulting in reduced impacts on the community and road users.

 

Additionally, the report discusses infrastructure improvements on York Street, including installation of a new streetcar track (between Queen Street West and Adelaide Street West) and a new cycle track (between Richmond Street West and King Street West). Metrolinx will install the new infrastructure to accommodate the TTC Queen 501 streetcar detour during the full closure of Queen Street required for the construction of the Ontario Line Queen Station. Finally, the report provides an overview of Metrolinx's outreach to the local community, including BIAs, community, and elected officials and their communication strategy during the project's construction.

 

The objective of the report is to seek City Council approval for the following:

 

- Implementation of long term temporary road closures and associated traffic regulation amendments required for the station construction,
 

- Implementation of new infrastructure improvements on York Street, including a new streetcar track and a cycle track, and
 

- Authority to negotiate and enter into an agreement with Metrolinx and TTC for the delivery of the new infrastructure works on York Street, between Queen Street West and King Street West.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 23, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Ontario Line Downtown Stations - Temporary Road Closures and Community Impacts
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173823.pdf
Appendix A - Ontario Line Early Works Construction - Road and Lane Closures for Six Downtown Stations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173824.pdf
Appendix B - Traffic By-law Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173825.pdf
Appendix C - Key Intersection Measures of Effectiveness
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173826.pdf
(December 7, 2021) Presentation from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Ontario Line Downtown Stations - Temporary Road Closures and Impacts
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-174118.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Communications (Committee)

(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Carolyn Johnson (EX.Supp)
(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Bray (EX.New)
(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (EX.New)
(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Coralina Lemos (EX.New)
(December 6, 2021) Letter from Cynthia Wilkey and John Wilson, Co-Chairs, West Don Lands Committee (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-142246.pdf
(December 6, 2021) Letter from Rick Green, Chair, FoSTRA (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-142247.pdf
(December 7, 2021) Letter from Diana Belshaw, Vice-President and Chair Development Committee, Gooderham & Worts Development Association (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-142249.pdf
(December 7, 2021) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 13, Toronto Centre (EX.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-142251.pdf
(December 7, 2021) E-mail from Alan Barthel, President, Longboat Area Residents' Association (EX.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/comm/communicationfile-142264.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 7, 2021) E-mail from Alan Potts (CC.Main)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp)

EX28.16 - The Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Step Along the Long Road of Reconciliation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office to select an Indigenous-led organization or consortium to operate the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship through an open competitive solicitation process in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code Chapters 71 and 195, City policies and procedures.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office, and when appropriate, the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, to negotiate, enter into, and execute, on behalf of the City, an operating, contribution/funding or any related Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship program agreements on such terms deemed necessary and appropriate by the City and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, with the designated operator of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship or other parties wishing to financially support the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, provided that required City funding is approved through the City's budget process; all such agreements, which may have a term of up to 10 years, shall be based upon respect, consultation and co-operation with the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship operator and draw inspiration from the Two Row Wampum that upholds Indigenous autonomy.

 

3. City Council endorse the key goals and elements of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship program model, as detailed in the report (September 20, 2021) from the Interim General Manager,  Economic Development and Culture and the Indigenous Affairs Office, which include: to provide a culturally safe space, connections, supports, programming and resources for Indigenous entrepreneurs and innovators; and to be an entrepreneurial resource centre by and for the Indigenous community.

 

4. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to recommend for City Council's consideration, as part of the 2022 budget process, adequate and appropriate funding for: a. the City's portion of Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship start-up costs between 2022 and first quarter 2024; and b. a reasonable share of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship's annual operating expenses for a period of not less than 10 years.

 

5. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office to report back to City Council on the status of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship in fourth quarter of 2022.

 

6. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office to report regularly on the progress of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee.

Origin

(October 22, 2021) Letter from the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee

Summary

At its meeting on October 22, 2021, Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee considered Item AA14.1 and made recommendations to City Council.

 

Summary from the report (September 20, 2021) from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office:

 

This report acknowledges that the land we call Toronto is the traditional territory of many nations including the Mississaugas of the Credit, the Anishnabeg, the Chippewa, the Haudenosaunee and the Wendat peoples, and is now home to many diverse First Nations, Inuit, and Métis Peoples. It also acknowledges that Toronto is covered by Treaty 13 signed with the Mississaugas of the Credit, and the Williams Treaties signed with multiple Mississaugas and Chippewa bands.

 

This report updates City Council on the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship's purpose, construction, funding, program model, and proposed Indigenous governance and accountability framework.

 

The planned 22,000 sq. ft. Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship facility will be situated in a commercial space located at 200 Dundas Street East. The first of its kind in Ontario, when it opens in 2023 the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship will become one of only a handful of incubators in Canada dedicated to Indigenous economic empowerment and business development. As such, the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship presents a significant opportunity to support and connect First Nations, Inuit and Métis entrepreneurs across Toronto, Ontario and Canada to critical resources and each other.

 

After many years of planning, collaboration and conversation with and among Indigenous communities in Toronto and beyond, the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship is now moving from planning to implementation. This project is a central pillar of the City of Toronto's collective reconciliation commitments and strategies, including the Reconciliation Action Plan, and concretely addresses the Truth and Reconciliation Commission's Call to Action 92 which states: "Ensure that Aboriginal peoples have equitable access to jobs, training, and education opportunities in the corporate sector, and that Aboriginal communities gain long-term sustainable benefits from economic development projects."

 

A Leadership Advisory Circle of Indigenous leaders, entrepreneurs, Elders and community members has guided the planning and implementation of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship since April 2019. The Leadership Advisory Circle's advice informs this report's core recommendations that (i) Council direct City staff to use an open, transparent, competitive process to select an Indigenous-led organization or consortium to serve as the operator of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship, and that (ii) agreements between the City of Toronto and the operator of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship be inspired by the Two Row Wampum's notion of equitable, peaceful, respectful co-existence between different nations.

 

A preliminary Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship program model has been developed through conversations with the Indigenous community and based on the "Nothing About Us Without Us" principle of self-determination. Grounded in needs and objectives defined by the Indigenous community, the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship will aim to provide culturally safe spaces, connections, and resources for Indigenous business and social entrepreneurs.

 

To date, the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship project and facility has been funded through a combination of Council approved Section 37 funds, reallocations within Economic Development and Culture's approved operating budget, and a grant from the Federal Economic Development Agency for Southern Ontario (FedDev Ontario).

 

Looking ahead, the City’s portion of the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship project's forecast operating costs for 2022 through first quarter 2024, totaling $3,304,729, are currently unfunded. There is also a need and opportunity for the City to confirm a longer-term funding contribution to support annual Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship operating expenses in a manner which strengthens the centre's ability to attract third party funding, advances Toronto's economic recovery in the wake of COVID-19, and represents a generational investment in Indigenous economic empowerment and prosperity.

 

Accordingly, this report proposes that adequate and appropriate funding to cover the City's portion of Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship start-up costs and to provide an annual contribution for the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship's annual operating expenses be recommended for Council's consideration as part of the 2022 budget process.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 22, 2021) Letter from the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee on The Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Step Along the Long Road of Reconciliation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173646.pdf
(September 20, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office on the Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Step Along the Long Road of Reconciliation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173647.pdf
(October 22, 2021) Presentation from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office on Indigenous Centre for Innovation and Entrepreneurship
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173648.pdf

EX28.18 - Accessibility Impacts on The Closure of Essential Bus Stops in Our Communities

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to request the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to arrange a presentation to the Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee in the first quarter of 2022 on the removal of the two Market Street bus stops on the 121 route, including an explanation of how an equity and accessibility analysis was used to consider the potential impacts of cancelling or moving bus stop locations in general and these stops in particular.

Origin

(November 15, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee

Summary

Summary from the letter (October 28, 2021) from Councillor Wong-Tam:

 

On October 6, my office received a notice from the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) noting the planned cancellation of two stops along the 121 bus route, effective October 10. The two existing stops were located at the intersection of Market Street and Lower Jarvis Street. According to the TTC, these changes are in part due to the new cycling tracks on the Esplanade but was mainly made to achieve the goal of 300-400m distance between stops.

 

Following the cancellation, many residents – particularly the many senior residents in the area – reached out with complaints about the lack of accessibility of this change.  The stop served three senior buildings including 85 The Esplanade (Old York Towers), 110 The Esplanade (Performing Arts Lodge) and 115 The Esplanade (OWN Coop Housing). In addition, both the bus stop’s proximity to St Lawrence Market made it essential for seniors to access a grocer without a vehicle.

 

Area residents have expressed concerns that the alternative stop now experiences heavier transit rider traffic, lacks coverings or benches, and increases the travel distance for many residents with mobility challenges. This may lead to increased demand for WheelTrans services for these residents. It appears that the notice and consultation about the removal of this stop, in particular, was not robust enough to consider the unique needs of this neighbourhood and its residents. Furthermore, it would be helpful to hear from the TTC how this decision was approved, and where this decision is documented.

 

Understanding that the TTC consults with the Advisory Committee for Accessible Transit (ACAT), I believe TAAC and its members would benefit from better understanding the rationale, including the accessibility and equity considerations behind cancelling bus stops and ensuring safety for all.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 15, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee on Accessibility Impacts on The Closure of Essential Bus Stops in Our Communities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173649.pdf
(October 28, 2021) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam on Accessibility Impacts on The Closure of Essential Bus Stops in our Communities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-173650.pdf

EX28.19 - Updating the Council Member-Organized Community Events Policy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Council Member-Organized Community Events Policy as follows:

 

a.  the prohibition that “in an election year, a Member of Council must not seek donations and sponsorships for any community event that has not been staged in the previous two years” not be applied to the 2022 election year; as a consequence, for this election year only, there would be no requirement to have held a similar community event in prior years; and

 

b.  the per member cap on all donations received in a calendar year for community events be increased from $10,000 to $20,000 in recognition of the fact that the size of Wards nearly doubled in 2018.

Origin

(December 3, 2021) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Summary

The Integrity Commissioner provides advice on policy matters dealing with issues of ethics and integrity for members of Council under the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and Chapter 3 of the Toronto Municipal Code.

 

Pursuant to the City of Toronto Act, 2006, Council may adopt policies that govern the activities of its members. The Council Member-Organized Community Events Policy governs how and when members may obtain donations for their community events. It was adopted by Council in 2008.

 

A public health emergency was declared in March 2020 and, as a result, in-person community events have been either been prohibited or discouraged for public safety purposes until now. The upcoming year, 2022, is an election year. The current policy prohibits members from seeking any donations for their community events in an election year if they have not held a similar event in the previous two years. The current policy does not account for the fact that in-person community events could not be held for most of the last two years.

 

The current policy includes a $10,000 cap on donations a member may receive each year. It should be updated because the size of Wards and the number of constituents per Ward almost doubled when the size of Council was reduced in 2018.

 

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that Council update the Council Member-Organized Community Events Policy to address these matters.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 3, 2021) Report form the Integrity Commissioner on Updating the Council Member-Organized Community Events Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-174018.pdf

Board of Health - Meeting 32

HL32.1 - Response to COVID-19 - December 2021 Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Deputy Medical Officer of Health has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (HL32.1a with recommendations).

Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Bill 1045 has been submitted on this Item.

Board Recommendations

The Board of Health recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Medical Officer of Health to negotiate, enter into, execute and extend any agreements with physicians providing medical services and advice to Toronto Public Health as part of the response to, and recovery from, the COVID-19 pandemic until December 31, 2023, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Medical Officer of Health and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Board Decision Advice and Other Information

The Board of Health considered Items HL32.1 and HL32.2 together.

 

The Deputy Medical Officer of Health gave a presentation on Response to COVID-19: December 2021 Update.

Origin

(November 22, 2021) Report from the Medical Officer of Health

Summary

This report provides an update on the response to the COVID-19 pandemic as of December 2021, and responds to Board of Health direction from October 2021 to report back with a range of updates on Toronto Public Health (TPH) pandemic-related efforts.

 

The most recent epidemiology shows a consistent increase in the 7-day moving average number of reported daily COVID-19 cases, the reproductive number and the test positivity rate and has prompted the provincial government to pause re-opening plans. Regulations under the Reopening Ontario Act enable local health units to institute additional public health measures, if necessary, and the need for these in Toronto will be continuously reviewed.

 

Efforts to respond to the pandemic continue to advance on multiple fronts. Toronto Public Health continues to support school boards and schools in providing information for parents and staff about managing school attendance during the current conditions, including screening, outbreak management and vaccines. Vaccine rollout continues with third doses for eligible individuals and, with the recent approval of the COVID-19 pediatric vaccine by Health Canada, preparations are underway for vaccinating children aged 5-11 years, pending receipt of pediatric vaccine.

 

Toronto Public Health's pandemic response and immunization campaign has benefited from the support of additional medical expertise. Given the continuing need for this expertise, this report seeks authorization from City Council to negotiate, enter into, execute, and extend any agreements with physicians providing medical services and advice to Toronto Public Health until December 2023, as part of the response to and recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background Information (Board)

(November 22, 2021) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on Response to COVID-19 - December 2021 Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173593.pdf
(December 6, 2021) Presentation from the Deputy Medical Officer of Health on Response to COVID-19: December 2021 Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-174056.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 14, 2021) Supplementary report from the Deputy Medical Officer of Health on Extending By-laws Necessary for COVID-19 Response until April 2022 (HL32.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174423.pdf

Speakers

Margot Boyd
Dr. Rochagné Kilian
Dr. Donald Welsh, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Western University
Derek Moran
Robert Meynell

Communications (Board)

(November 8, 2021) E-mail from Christine Massey (HL.Main)
(November 9, 2021) E-mail from Christine Massey (HL.Main)
(November 24, 2021) Submission from Julian Northey (HL.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/hl/comm/communicationfile-140437.pdf
(December 6, 2021) Submission from Margot Boyd (HL.New)
(December 6, 2021) Submission from Dr. Rochagné Kilian (HL.New)
(December 6, 2021) Submission from Derek Moran (HL.New)
(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Julie Ponesse, The Democracy Fund and Canadian Covid Care Alliance (HL.New)

Communications (City Council)

(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Derek Crane (CC.Main)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Greg Knittl (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Yvonne Garson (CC.Supp)

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 25

CA25.1 - Appointment of Public Member to the Toronto Transit Commission Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Transit Commission Board

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint Ron Lalonde to the Toronto Transit Commission Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on February 4, 2025, and until a successor is appointed.

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 4 to the report (November 8, 2021) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Transit Commission Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidate's biography:

 

Ron Lalonde

 

Ron Lalonde retired from CIBC in 2010. Ron's career at CIBC covered most areas of the Bank, as well as business assignments in New York and in London. He was a member of CIBC's Executive Team from 1999 to 2010. During this period, Ron had responsibility for virtually all of CIBC's support functions, including Finance and Technology. Ron sits on several private and non-profit boards. He earned a BA and MBA from the University of Western Ontario. He is married and raised two children in Toronto.

Origin

(November 8, 2021) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will conduct interviews and recommend one candidate to City Council for appointment to the Toronto Transit Commission Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 8, 2021) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Member to the Toronto Transit Commission Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-173000.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Transit Commission Board (previously circulated with Item CA23.2)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Diversity Summary of Current Members of the Toronto Transit Commission Board (previously circulated with Item CA23.2)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview Schedule for November 18, 2021 (to be circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview Questions for November 18, 2021 (to be circulated under separate cover)

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 26

CA26.1 - Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Investment Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Toronto Investment Board

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Investment Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending December 16, 2025, and until successors are appointed:

 

John Crocker, as Chair

Kevin Adolphe

Sue Lemon

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 5 to the report (November 24, 2021) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Investment Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

John Crocker, as Chair

 

John Crocker retired in 2011 as President and CEO of the Healthcare of Ontario Pension Plan. HOOPP is Canada’s largest private trust with more than 400,000 members and $104 Billion in assets. With a forty year career in the pension and investment industries his senior executive experience has lead to a wealth of practical experience in strategy development, project management and board governance. He is a graduate of McGill University, the Institute of Corporate Directors Program and is a CFA.

 

Kevin Adolphe

 

Kevin has over 35 years of global experience in asset management and financial services. He is a Partner at CEO Coaching International. Previously, he was President and CEO, Manulife Asset Management Private Markets. Prior to Manulife, Kevin was Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of CIBC World Markets. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Professional Accountants (Ontario), a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors and serves on a variety of public and private Boards.

 

Sue Lemon

 

Sue Lemon, CFA, CEO and Board Member, CFA Society Toronto. Sue Lemon is CFA Society Toronto’s Chief Executive Officer and leads the Society’s strategic direction which includes promoting high ethical standards in the financial industry and increasing the visibility of the charter with key partners in the financial community. CFA Society Toronto is the world’s largest group of charter holders among 160 Societies globally. Sue is an experienced investment executive with over 35 years experience.

Origin

(November 24, 2021) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will conduct interviews and recommend three candidates to City Council for appointment to the Toronto Investment Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 24, 2021) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Public Members to the Toronto Investment Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-173523.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Candidates, Qualifications, Confidential Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Toronto Investment Board (previously circulated with Item CA25.3)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Diversity Summary of Current Members of the Toronto Investment Board (previously circulated with Item CA25.3)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interest in Chair Position from Current Members (previously circulated with Item CA25.3)
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview Questions for December 6, 2021 (to be circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 5 - Interview Schedule for December 6, 2021 (to be circulated under separate cover)

CA26.2 - Appointment of a Public Member to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual who is being considered for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint Joseph Ogilvie, pending approval of the composition exemption request from the Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks, to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending July 16, 2023, and until a successor is appointed.

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 4 to the report (November 23, 2021) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidate's biography:

 

Joseph Ogilvie

 

Joe Ogilvie is the Founding Principal at Archangel Ventures, an innovation advisory practice focused on the real estate and construction sector. Joe spent 10 years leading sustainable, high-performance building development and construction projects across Canada, and is founder of the Urban Lab at the Brookfield Centre for Real Estate and Infrastructure at a Schulich School of Business. He is a board director at Environmental Defence Canada & Habitat for Humanity GTA and co-founder of the BOF.

Origin

(November 23, 2021) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

A public member of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) Board resigned in August 2021. The Civic Appointments Committee will conduct interviews and recommend one public member to City Council for appointment to the TRCA to fill this vacancy.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 23, 2021) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of a Public Member to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-173896.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of candidates, qualifications, confidential diversity information summary, and applications for appointment to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (previously distributed with Item CA25.2)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Voluntary Diversity Information for Current Appointees to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (previously distributed with Item CA25.2)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview schedule for December 6, 2021 (to be circulated under separate cover)
Confidential Attachment 4 - Interview questions for December 6, 2021 (to be circulated under separate cover)

CA26.3 - Appointment of Members to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 14, 2022:

 

Cynthia Bell-Clayton

Leonard Benoit

Nora Boyer

Isaac Crosby

Chris Lefebvre

Christine Luza

Saige McMahon

Patricia Pettigrew

Tristen Schneider

Suzanne Stewart

 

2. City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 25, 2021) from the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office remain confidential as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals who are being considered for appointment to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Cynthia Bell-Clayton

 

I am a member of the Wiikwemkoong Unceded Territory, Odawa, Ojibway and Pottawatomi ancestry, functional speaker of Odawa/Ojibway, moved 9 years ago to Toronto with 3 children. I have extensive knowledge with both living on and off reserve. I was Cultural Programmer in Wikwemikong for over 15 years supporting the community to reclaim our language, culture and history. Since being in Toronto, I helped youth create their own agency to support their growth to healthy independent living.

 

Leonard Benoit

 

Leonard Benoit is Qualipu Mi’Kmag First Nations from the territory of Newfoundland and Labrador. His spirit name is Circling Wolf, and he is Wolf Clan. He has a valid Ontario Nursing license and has been practicing for the last 21 years. He also holds certification in the Community Worker Program, he has completed Palliative Care Certification through Seneca College, and he is also a Death Doula. Currently he is finishing a Thanalogy program at Centennial College.

 

Nora Boyer

 

My name is Nora Jane Boyer. My spirit name is Spring Water Spirit Women. My roots derive from North and South America. My clans are eagle and condor for which I take great pride. I have worked in urban and rural community in non-profit and for multiple government positions for approximately 2.5 decades beginning at the Native Canadian Centre of Toronto. I have great passion to foster healthy relations with all nations and to be a strong mentor for my two beautiful children.

 

Isaac Crosby

 

Isaac Crosby comes from a small farming community 30 minutes south of Windsor, ON called Harrow, ON. He is proud of his Ojibwa/Black Canadian heritage and looks forward to sharing their histories. He studied Landscape Horticulture Tech at Humber College and currently leads urban agriculture programming at Evergreen Brick Works, now virtually! He incorporates his education and traditional First Nations farming to grow great crops, to teach others, and to do his part in saving the Earth.

 

Chris Lefebvre

 

Originally from Northern Ontario, and a member of Mattagami First Nation, Chris is a graduate of the University of Ottawa. Throughout his career, he has never wavered in the focus and attention he puts toward Indigenous economic development. This includes his work at Shell Canada, Scotiabank, as well as in his home community of Mattagami. When he’s away from work, Chris maintains an active lifestyle and enjoys mountain biking, paddle boarding and golf.

 

Christine Luza

 

As a speaker, researcher and consultant, Christine advises educators, governments, and institutions on how to improve relations with Indigenous peoples.She has more than 15 years of experience in Toronto supporting cultural renewal,innovative programs,research and development in Indigenous agencies.Christine has impacted more than 5,000 people through Indigenous education and training. She has advised the Canadian Senate,and draws inspiration from the leaders in her community in all of her work.

 

Saige McMahon

 

Saige McMahon is queer Anishinaabekwe (she/her) settler mix originally from Treaty 3 Territories, Rainy River First Nations. Saige has always found a passion in learning about and upholding the rights of others while working directly alongside community. Currently residing in Toronto, Saige is the Manager of Harm Reduction and Programming at 2-Spirited People of the 1st Nations.

 

Patricia Pettigrew

 

I am a member of the Algonquins of Pikwaknangan First Nation. I have been involved in the Toronto Indigenous Community for over 50 years. I am the founder and Executive Director of Thunder Woman Healing Lodge Society. TWHLS is the first Indigenous Healing Lodge in Ontario for Indigenous women leaving Canada's correctional institutions. I am dedicated to the advancement of First Nations, Metis, Inuit and 2SLGBTQ+ people across Canada.

 

Tristen Schneider

 

Tristen is an Anishinaabe-Dene facilitator, advocate, and entrepreneur from Shawanaga First Nation Ojibway Territory. She is a forthcoming young woman distinct in various trilateral political advocacy work for First Nations Youth focused on Mental Health & Life Promotion initiatives in previous networks; the Independent First Nations, Ontario First Nations Young People’s Council, Feathers of Hope, Chiefs of Ontario, and Thunderbird Partnership Foundation.

 

Suzanne Stewart

 

Dr. Suzanne L Stewart is a member of the Yellowknife Dene First Nation. She is a registered psychologist and Director of the Waakebiness-Bryce Institute for Indigenous Health at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at U of T, where she is an Associate Professor in the Division of Social and Behaviour Health Sciences. Research and teaching interests include Indigenous health and healing with specializations psychology, homelessness, and Indigenous knowledges methodologies.

Origin

(November 25, 2021) Report from the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office

Summary

The report recommends the appointment of 10 public members to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 25, 2021) Report from the Director, Indigenous Affairs Office on Appointment of Members to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-173797.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of Recommended Candidates, Qualifications, and Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary, and Applications for Appointment to the Aboriginal Affairs Advisory Committee

Economic and Community Development Committee - Meeting 26

EC26.4 - Amendments to Agreement with Campbell House Museum

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend its decision on Item 2019.EC8.9, headed "Sustaining the Vibrancy of Campbell House Museum", by deleting Parts 6 and 8 and replacing them with the following new Parts 6 and 8:

 

"6.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to negotiate the following amendments to the 1971 Agreement between the City of Toronto and the Sir William Campbell Foundation:

 

a.  remove all references and obligations in relation to The Advocates' Society;

 

b.  reduce the Foundation's financial obligations in a manner commensurate with the City of Toronto assuming responsibility for capital repairs to the Campbell House on a permanent basis; and

 

c.  any other terms that may be mutually satisfactory to both parties, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the City Manager.

 

8.  City Council amend former City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 68, Museums to:

 

a.  add capital repairs to the responsibilities of the City of Toronto and to make capital expenditures in accordance with the applicable budget allocation, year over year; and

 

b.  reflect amendments to the 1971 Agreement between the City of Toronto and the Sir William Campbell Foundation, as necessary."

 

2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to sign an Amending Agreement with the Sir William Campbell Foundation as outlined in Recommendation 1 above.

Origin

(November 15, 2021) Report from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority to amend Parts 6 and 8 of Council's decision on Item EC8.9, "Sustaining the Vibrancy of Campbell House Museum", adopted by Council at its October 29-30, 2019 meeting.

 

The report on Item EC8.9 recommended an Amending Agreement to the 1971 Agreement between the City of Toronto and the Sir William Campbell Foundation to operate the property known as Campbell House, located at 160 Queen Street West, as a public historical museum. The recommendations inadvertently assigned capital maintenance and repair responsibilities to the Campbell House Board of Management instead of to the City of Toronto. This report recommends an amendment to correct the error so that it reads that the City of Toronto is responsible for capital repairs of the Campbell House as reflected in the staff report.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 15, 2021) Report from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Amendments to Agreement with Campbell House Museum
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173385.pdf

EC26.5 - Changes to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 15 - Don Valley West

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council, in accordance with the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy, appoint the following nominees to the Business Improvement Area Boards of Management below, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office expiring at the end of the term of Council or as soon thereafter as successors are appointed:

 

            Mount Pleasant Village:

            Matthew Kutas

            Robert Prete

 

            Uptown Yonge:

            Stephen Lokash

 

2.  City Council remove the following directors from the Business Improvement Area Boards of Management set out below:

 

            Mount Pleasant Village:

            Scott Purdy

 

            Uptown Yonge:

            Alex Mazelow 

Origin

(November 9, 2021) Report from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to make changes to the Mount Pleasant Village and Uptown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA) Boards of Management, in accordance with the requirements of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas. The Mount Pleasant Village and Uptown Yonge BIAs fall within two Community Council boundaries.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 9, 2021) Report from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Changes to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173386.pdf

EC26.6 - Proposed Terms and Conditions for a Long-Term Lease with A Different Booklist Cultural Centre at 756 Bathurst Street and Acceptance of Donations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council waive the application of the Community Space Tenancy Policy in respect of the Lease, including the requirements outlined in the Request for Expressions of Interest in the Community Space Tenancy Policy, and declare that it is in the interest of the City of Toronto to grant a Lease to A Different Booklist Cultural Centre for nominal consideration.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to negotiate and enter into a 49-year below-market rent lease agreement (the "Lease") between the City of Toronto, as the Landlord, and A Different Booklist Cultural Centre, as the Tenant, in respect of 756 Bathurst Street (the "Leased Premises"), substantially on the major terms and conditions in Attachment 1 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the Director, Strategic Partnerships and on other terms and conditions as deemed appropriate by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management or their designate and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council declare 756 Bathurst Street surplus with the intended manner of disposal to be by way of a long-term lease to A Different Booklist Cultural Centre and City Council direct staff to take all steps necessary to comply with the City of Toronto's real estate disposal process set out in City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 213, Real Property.

 

4.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, as the Landlord, to permit the Tenant, A Different Booklist Cultural Centre, to perform State of Good Repair and Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act compliance work on behalf of the Landlord with an estimated value of $7,688,000 exclusive of Harmonized Sales Tax, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, as outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the Director, Strategic Partnerships, and including compliance with the City of Toronto's Fair Wage Policy and labour trade contractual obligations and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

5.  City Council authorize the Director, Strategic Partnerships to accept donations in compliance with the Donations to the City of Toronto For Community Benefits Policy, subject to A Different Booklist Cultural Centre satisfying the terms and conditions in Attachment 2 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the Director, Strategic Partnerships.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the Director, Strategic Partnerships

Summary

This report seeks authority for the City (as the "Landlord") to enter into a 49-year below-market rent lease agreement (the "Lease") with A Different Booklist Cultural Centre ("A.D.B.C.C.", as the "Tenant") in respect of the property located at 756 Bathurst Street. 756 Bathurst Street is a three-storey building with ground floor retail fronting on Bathurst Street that will be purchased by the City from the developer of the adjacent mixed-use development known as Mirvish Village (the "Leased Premises"), pursuant to an Agreement of Purchase and Sale executed in December 2017.

 

A.D.B.C.C. is an organization engaged in promoting the cultural, social, educational and economic well-being of the African Canadian and Caribbean Canadian communities, by providing space for community projects and events; and through the sale of cultural and educational products. Although the organization is a not-for-profit, it is associated with a for-profit bookstore, which makes them ineligible to participate in the City's Community Space Tenancy program. By entering into the Lease, A.D.B.C.C. will become eligible for federal capital funding programs.

 

This report also seeks authority for the City to accept donations in compliance with the Donations to the City of Toronto For Community Benefits Policy with respect to the capital project at 756 Bathurst Street until A.D.B.C.C. achieves charitable status with the Canada Revenue Agency and is able to issue charitable receipts for income tax purposes for donations received on behalf of their own organization. 

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the Interim General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the Director, Strategic Partnerships on Proposed Terms and Conditions for a Long-Term Lease with A Different Booklist Cultural Centre at 756 Bathurst Street and Acceptance of Donations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173418.pdf
Attachment 1 - Suggested Terms and Conditions of Intention to Enter into a Long-Term Lease with A Different Booklist Cultural Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173419.pdf
Attachment 2 - Suggested Terms and Conditions for Toronto Strategic Partnerships Office to Agree to Accept Donations on Behalf of A Different Booklist Cultural Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173420.pdf

Speakers

Lionel Borelson, Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants
Dan Yashinsky
Carl James, York University
Heather Kelly, Bloor St. Culture Corridor
Councillor Mike Layton

EC26.7 - City of Toronto Diverse Youth Fellowship Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council endorse the enhanced Diversity Youth Fellowship Program for 2022-2024 supported by Urban Alliance on Race Relations, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the City Council budget.

 

2.  City Council request Social Development, Finance and Administration and the City Clerk's Office to enter into a contract with Urban Alliance on Race Relations to co-fund and administer the Diverse Youth Fellowship Program based on the approved budget.

 

3.  City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the City Clerk's Office to work in collaboration with Urban Alliance on Race Relations to report back on the outcomes of the Diverse Youth Fellowship Program to the Economic and Community Development Committee in 2024.

Origin

(November 17, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

The following report outlines the enhanced workforce development model for the Diverse Youth Fellowship and the costs associated with the implementation of the program from 2022-2024.

 

The Diverse Youth Fellowship is a leadership program that provides youth from neighbourhood improvement areas across Toronto who are experiencing systemic barriers and discrimination with paid employment and valuable opportunities for career development at the City of Toronto. The program places 30 highly motivated youth from diverse backgrounds in Council Member Offices for 12 weeks. During their placements, Youth Fellows work directly with elected officials and staff on advocacy, case work, policy, research, administrative support, communications and event planning. The Diverse Youth Fellowship program provides a unique space for youth who experience multiple systemic barriers to equitably participate in civic engagement and workforce development opportunities.

 

The Diverse Youth Fellowship consolidates the pre-existing Black, Muslim, Tamil, Filipino and Protégée Fellowships under one umbrella to improve planning, coordination and integration of supports. The consolidation of these programs also incorporates an enhanced workforce development model to support Youth Fellows with their professional development and builds effective pathways to future quality employment.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 17, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on City of Toronto Diverse Youth Fellowship Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173350.pdf
Attachment 1 - Inventory of City of Toronto Youth Fellowship Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173351.pdf
Attachment 2 - Enhanced Workforce Development Model
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173352.pdf

Speakers

Jomia Pangilinan, Filipino Youth Fellowship
Warsan Hagi-Yusuf, Urban Alliance on Race Relations
Richmond Uy, Urban Alliance on Race Relations
Sanaa Ali-Mohammed, Urban Alliance on Race Relations
Issaq Ahmed, Black Youth Fellowship Program
Neethan Shan, Urban Alliance on Race Relations
Naeema Hassan
Fatah Awil, Urban Alliance on Race Relations
Kaushika Vinotheeswaran
Nilosa Selvakumaran, Urban Alliance on Race Relations

EC26.8 - Supporting Food Security in St. James Town

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Board of Directors of Toronto Community Housing Corporation to request the President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation to undertake the capital improvements required to establish a community food space at 200 Wellesley Street East and to lead a Request for Expressions of Interest process, identifying a collaborative of community agencies to activate the space and operationalize the coordination, activation and resident participation for the space.

Origin

(November 17, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report responds to City Council direction to determine the operational and staffing cost requirement to support the mandate of the Interim Collaborative Framework for Healthy Food Security in St. James Town and the costs related to providing community space at 200 Wellesley Street East. The report provides a summary of the Collaborative Framework, actions taken to date, a model for supporting the mandate of the Collaborative Framework as well as details of the design and costs for redesigned community space at 200 Wellesley Street East.

 

The St. James Town Community Food Table was established in January 2021. This table was initiated by City staff following direction from City Council and convened with representation from community agencies, residents and residential apartment owner groups, including Toronto Community Housing Corporation and City divisions. In July 2021, a report was submitted to Council outlining the outcomes of the table, including an Interim Collaborative Framework developed by the members of the table.

 

The report recommends that funds be provided: i) to advance the goals and principles of the Collaborative Framework and key actions of the Food Table through start-up resources for facilitation, coordination, activation and resident focused capacity building and ii) to advance capital investments in a new community food space at 200 Wellesley Street East.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 17, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Supporting Food Security in St. James Town
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173376.pdf
Appendix A - Diagrams and Plans for the 200 Wellesley Food Hub
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173377.pdf
Appendix B - Toronto Community Housing Capital Costs for 200 Wellesley Food Hub
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173378.pdf

Speakers

Cliff Martin, St. James Town Residents Association
Randy Alexander
Alfred Kubesch
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Communications (Committee)

(November 30, 2021) Submission from Cliff Martin, St. James Town Residents Association (EC.New)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Cliff Martin, St. James Town Residents Association (EC.New)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Randy Alexander (EC.New)

EC26.10 - Request to Review Chapter 349, Animals Exception for Reptilia Zoo

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council not grant a site-specific exception for Reptilia Zoo, at 245 Queens Quay West, under Section 349-4, Prohibited Animals Exemptions, of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 349, Animals.

Origin

(November 17, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

This report responds to the Economic and Community Development Committee (ECDC)'s request to explore a site-specific exception in Chapter 349, Animals to permit the operations of Reptilia Zoo at 245 Queens Quay West (Harbourfront Centre).

 

Reptilia is a reptile zoo with locations in Vaughan and Whitby. Their operations include a self-guided visitation centre with exhibits that house numerous reptiles, as well as both on-site and off-site shows for education and entertainment. Reptilia's existing locations also have ancillary business functions such as adopting out reptiles, and the retail sale of food and equipment for keeping reptiles as pets.

 

The company has been in discussions with Harbourfront Centre as a prospective tenant. Reptilia's proposed program includes animals that fall under the Prohibited Animals list in Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 349, Animals. ECDC has requested that staff consider the specific species that would be permitted if the Animals Bylaw was amended to provide a site-specific exception for Reptilia's operations, and the health and safety implications associated with City Council granting an exception.

 

To respond to this request, staff undertook targeted stakeholder consultation and research on the implications of such an exception, including those related to health and safety, animal welfare, and economic development. Based on the findings of this work, staff do not recommend amending the bylaw to grant a site-specific exception to the Animals Bylaw. While this report recommends against an exception, staff note that the company can still pursue its operations without housing species listed in the Prohibited Animals list.

 

This report was written in consultation with Economic Development and Culture, Toronto Public Health, and Corporate Real Estate Management.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 17, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Request to Review Chapter 349, Animals Exception for Reptilia Zoo
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173358.pdf

Speakers

Travis Small, Reptilia
Dr. Clifford Warwick, Emergent Disease Foundation
Barry Kent MacKay, Born Free USA
Ainslie Willock
Scott Tinney, Animal Justice
Liz White, Animal Alliance of Canada
Rachel Plotkin, David Suzuki Foundation
Dr. Ronald Orenstein
Erika Ritter
Verena Besso
Rob Laidlaw, Zoocheck Inc.
Martin Kenneally, Harbourfront Centre
Councillor Paul Ainslie

Communications (Committee)

(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Angelo Bertolas, York Quay Neighbourhood Association (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/comm/communicationfile-140572.pdf
(November 30, 2021) Submission from Kim Wright, Wright Strategies, on behalf of Reptilia (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/comm/communicationfile-141453.pdf
(December 1, 2021) Submission from Kim Wright, Wright Strategies, on behalf of Reptilia (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/comm/communicationfile-141454.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Martin Kenneally, Harbourfront Centre (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/comm/communicationfile-141466.pdf
(December 1, 2021) Submission from Glenn De Baeremaeker, Zoocheck Inc. (EC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/comm/communicationfile-141550.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Louise (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from P. Wilson (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Deborah Perry (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Paola Catapano (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Keefe Jassoy (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Lesly Taylor (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Emily Getmeneko (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Laurence Olivo (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Kathy McDonald (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Fadalti (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Janine Cavin (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from D. R. Robbie (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Jenny (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Amy Sevigny (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Carly Ferguson (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) Letter from Diane Fraleigh, Member of Ontario Captive Animal Watch (OCAW) (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Elizabeth Abbott (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Colleen Perrin (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Ruth-Anne (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Cath Ens-Hurwood (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Lorenzo Berardinetti (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Lamorie (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Cheryl Albuquerque (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Denis (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Gerald R. Brown (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Stacey Grieve (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Maureen (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Stacey Segstro and Joe Morris (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Mary Pinelli and Phil Morrison (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Elsa Campuzano (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from David (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Karin Nelson (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Tom Skraba (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Meghan Fraser (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Sara Crane (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Karolyn Hardmeier (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Kara Woodall (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Gabriela Tymowski-Gionet (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Geraldine Lindley (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Katherine Wightman (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Sandra Alves (CC.Supp)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Michael Minuck (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Garritano (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Sharron Ready (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Suzann Ritchie (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Kit Chapman (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Sabrina Muglia (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Mark Voysey (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Deborah Stiff (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Beverley Drolet (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Paula (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from John McVicker (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Miguel (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Desjarlais (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Daina (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Tita Zierer (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Holly Penfound (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Donna Struk (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Milena Gibson (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Rebecca (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Pauline Robert (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Magdalena Dabbour (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Debbie Fong (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Andrea Thompson (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Connie (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Ildiko (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Janet (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Joi Williams (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Marilyn (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Norma (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Paula Simpson (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Peter (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Shahrzad (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Teresa (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Una (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Peg Harrington (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Nina Wedge (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Carolyn (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Margaret Haskell-Michalczuk (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Sandra Gallant-Crabtree (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Shan Gordon (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Sally Hewitt (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer McKinney (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Maureen Boag (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Monica (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Vanessa Tassone (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Sophie Middleton (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Kristol Gaetz (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Marg (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Erin Whike (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Janet Latremouille (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Florine (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Susan (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Les Bird (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jako Blurch (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Cordner (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Claudia Biagi (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Paul Mander (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Brian Child, President, Reptilia (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142680.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Doris Potter (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Caroline Kipling (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Peter Parrot (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Debbie Wall and The Gang of Fur (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Feher (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Julie (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Cathy Veris (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Sadaf Mohamud (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Zoe Jordan (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Elissa Pinkney (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Christina Vani (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jack and Sue Sarge (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Megan Hashemi (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Donna Pearson (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Katie (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Yvette (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Julie (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Margarete Sagebiel (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Vicki Van Linden (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Liz White, Director, Animal Alliance of Canada (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142745.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Liza (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) Submission from Rob Laidlaw, Zoocheck Inc. (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Alison (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jenny (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Louis Grittani (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Regina Toledo (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Talar Thomasian (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Patricia Burns (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Summer Kelly (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jenni Slaven (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Peter Smith (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Brad Jones (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Marion Markham (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Diane M. Kastel and Family (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Holly Penfound (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jenny McQueen (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Louise Jorgensen (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Michelle Labrosse (CC.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Victoria Trifoli (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Michele Carlucci (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Carolyn Helstrom (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Adele Reynolds (CC.New)

EC26.13 - Updates to Spotlight on Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the updates to "Spotlight on Toronto: A Strategic Action Plan for the Film, Television and Digital Media Industry", which was approved by City Council on July 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2017 [Item 2017.ED22.4], as outlined in "Spotlight on Toronto - 2021 Review and Updates" [Item 2021.FB10.1] under "Possible Future Strategic Priorities" and with the following additional Strategic Priorities:

 

a.  under Part 3 – Exceptional Customer Service Enhancements:

 

- Complete technical application to ensure smooth implementation of the new film permit fees to support expansion of customer service initiatives; and

 

b.  under Part 5 – Dynamic Branding and Strong International and Business Partnerships:

 

- Leverage partnerships and City Communications to advance economic and cultural contribution of both the domestic and international production industry in Toronto.

 

- Track and highlight the successes of work force development groups across the film industry.

 

2.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to ensure that a film friendly lens is incorporated in new developments in the City of Toronto.

 

3.  City Council direct the Film Commissioner and Director, Entertainment Industries to report back to the Film, Television and Digital Media Advisory Board on the impact of xoTO brand promotions.

Origin

(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Film, Television and Digital Media Advisory Board

Summary

At its meeting on November 17, 2021, the Film, Television and Digital Media Advisory Board considered Item FB10.1 and made recommendations to the Economic and Community Development Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Film, Television and Digital Media Advisory Board on Review of Spotlight on Toronto Updates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173460.pdf
Submission from the Board Chair and Co-Chair and Economic Development and Culture Staff on Spotlight on Toronto - 2021 Review and Updates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173461.pdf

EC26.15 - Supporting our Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) in Following the Toronto Pollinator Protection Strategy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to report back in the second quarter of 2022 on the establishment of supports and guidelines for Toronto's Business Improvement Areas to follow the Toronto Pollinator Protection Strategy.

Origin

(November 17, 2021) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks

Summary

In 2018, Toronto City Council unanimously adopted the Toronto Pollinator Protection Strategy. With the goal of protecting the more than 360 species of bees and more than 100 species of butterflies and other pollinators in the city, this comprehensive strategy laid out the guiding principles, priorities and actions that the city must take to protect our diverse native pollinator community.

 

Since adopting the strategy, our city's parks have become a thriving home for pollinators, with new additions being added each year. Unfortunately, our community's main streets have not followed this lead, as our Business Improvement Areas have been left to their own devices, without an established guide for landscaping or plant life on our city's right-of-ways. By creating a support system for our BIAs to help enhance the existing Toronto Pollinator Protection Strategy, we can ensure the strategy continues to expand its impact across Toronto.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 17, 2021) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks on Supporting our Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) in Following the Toronto Pollinator Protection Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173416.pdf

EC26.16 - Status of Federal-Provincial Negotiations on Affordable and Accessible Child Care

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
This item will be considered with Item DM38.1

Committee Recommendations

The Economic and Community Development Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council receive the report (November 30, 2021) from the General Manager, Children's Services for information.

Origin

(November 30, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

This report provides an update to City Council on the status of negotiations with the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada regarding agreements and the flow of funding for the Canada-Wide Early Learning and Child Care Plan announced in the 2021 Federal Budget. It also outlines options for the City of Toronto to partner directly with the Government of Canada if an agreement cannot be reached with the Province of Ontario.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 30, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Children's Services on Status of Federal-Provincial Negotiations on Affordable and Accessible Child Care
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ec/bgrd/backgroundfile-173918.pdf

General Government and Licensing Committee - Meeting 27

GL27.3 - Status of Outstanding Payments in Lieu of Tax Amounts for Federal, Provincial and Municipal Properties

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council receive the report (November 10, 2021) from the Controller for information. 

Origin

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report provides information on the status of payments in lieu of taxes requested from federal, provincial and municipal properties, and identifies payments in lieu of taxes payments from all levels of government that remain outstanding as at December 31, 2020.  The status of outstanding payments in lieu of taxes is reported to Council annually in accordance with a recommendation from the Auditor General in 2015.

 

Payments in lieu of taxes are voluntary payments made to the City of Toronto by the federal, provincial and municipal governments and agencies to compensate the City for municipal services it delivers to their properties.  In most cases, government agencies pay the full amount of payments in lieu of taxes that the City requests.  There may, however, be outstanding payments in lieu of taxes amounts requested from federal, provincial or municipal bodies that the Controller has concluded, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to be uncollectible.  In these cases, the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71 (Financial Control) provides authority to the Controller, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to adjust for accounting purposes any outstanding receivables in respect of payments in lieu of taxes that have been determined unlikely to be paid.

 

No payments in lieu of taxes receivables are being recommended for adjustment/write-off at this time.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Controller on Status of Outstanding Payments in Lieu of Tax Amounts for Federal, Provincial and Municipal Properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173315.pdf
Attachment 1 - Summary of Outstanding Payments in Lieu of Tax Amounts by Level of Government
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173316.pdf

GL27.7 - Union Station North Bay Pedestrian Bridge Connection

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to approve and execute a nominal sum construction and licence agreement with Hines 141 Bay Property Inc. and 141 Bay Street Property I Inc. for the construction and maintenance of a publicly accessible pedestrian bridge connection between 141 Bay Street and Union Station on City-owned land at Union Station (the "North Bay Pedestrian Bridge"), and the partial funding of an interior ramp connection within Union Station, substantially on the major terms set out in Attachment 1 to the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and such other terms as may be acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council amend the 2021-2030 Council Approved Capital Budget and Plan of Corporate Real Estate Management to add a new project called "North Bay Pedestrian Bridge Connection," with $1 million of project cost ($150,000 of cash flow in 2021 and $850,000 of cash flow in 2022), fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from 1-7 The Esplanade (Source Account: XR3026-3700570).

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

The purpose of the report is to seek authority to enter into a construction and licence agreement with Hines 141 Bay Property Inc. and 141 Bay Street Property I Inc. (collectively, the "141 Bay Owner") for the construction and maintenance of the new North Bay Pedestrian Bridge at Union Station, and to amend the Corporate Real Estate Management capital budget to fund part of the interior adjustments to the east wing of Union Station. The North Bay Pedestrian Bridge will connect the publicly-accessible P.A.T.H. from Union Station to the new Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce head office building at 141 Bay Street, partially on City-owned land at Union Station.

 

Corporate Real Estate Management is proposing to add a new project called "North Bay Pedestrian Bridge Connection," with $1 million in project costs, and $150,000 of cash flow in 2021 and $850,000 of cash flow in 2022, fully funded by Section 37 (Planning Act Reserve Funds) community benefits from 1-7 The Esplanade. As the total project cost is currently estimated at $2.8 million pending project finalization, the 141 Bay Owner will fund the remaining $1.8 million and all future project costs, as part of the cost sharing agreement outlined in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Union Station North Bay Pedestrian Bridge Connection
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173382.pdf

GL27.8 - Award of Request for Proposal Document Number 2759379260 to Marsh Canada Limited for the Provision of Insurance Broker Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Director, Insurance and Risk Management to negotiate and enter into an insurance broker agreement with Marsh Canada Limited (the "Agreement"), being the highest scoring Supplier meeting the requirements of Request for Proposal Document Number 2759379260 for a term of five (5) years from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2026 for the following:

 

a. for insurance broker services for the City's property and casualty insurance program (the "Corporate Insurance Program"), together with ancillary insurance consulting services, all at a cost of up to $525,000 net of all taxes for the insurance broker services for the Corporate Insurance Program and the consulting services; and

 

b. for the placement of insurance policies as may be required from time to time   as determined by the Director, Insurance and Risk Management under Recommendation 2, for both the Corporate Insurance Program and for division specific purposes ("Divisional Insurance"), payable through Marsh Canada Limited to the insurers at the cost of the insurance premiums, inclusive of broker fees that cannot be determined in advance of purchase, on terms and conditions as set out in the Request for Proposal, and on others terms satisfactory to the Director, Insurance and Risk Management and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council authorize the Director, Insurance and Risk Management to determine the appropriate insurance policies to be placed through the Agreement for both the City's Corporate Insurance Program and for the City's Divisional Insurance that may arise during the term of the Agreement, all upon such terms, including pricing and length of policy term, as are satisfactory to the Director, Insurance and Risk Management, in consultation with Marsh Canada Limited, subject to a Council-approved budget.

Origin

(November 15, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the results of the Request for Proposal Document Number 2759379260 for insurance broker services for the City of Toronto and to request authority to negotiate and enter into an agreement with the recommended Supplier, Marsh Canada Limited, for a five (5) year term.

 

The Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Chief Procurement Officer request authority to contract with and utilize the services of Marsh Canada Limited to access the worldwide insurance marketplace to obtain quotes on insurance policies and report the results to staff, and request that City Council delegate authority to the Director, Insurance and Risk Management or their designate, for the placement of various insurance policies during the term of this agreement.  The costs identified in this report represent insurance broker fees only.  Costs of the various insurance policies to be procured will be determined at the time of their renewal or procurement, and be subject to a Council-approved budget.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 15, 2021) Report from the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management on Award of Request for Proposal Document Number 2759379260 to Marsh Canada Limited for the Provision of Insurance Broker Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173311.pdf
Attachment 1 - Fairness Monitor's Final Attestation Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173312.pdf

GL27.9 - Award of Request for Tender Ariba Document Number 3032617265 to Aquicon Construction Company Limited for the Construction of the North East Scarborough Community Recreation Centre and Joyce Trimmer Park Improvements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council, in accordance with Section 195-8.5 of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Purchasing) authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Children's Services to award and enter into an agreement with Aquicon Construction Company Limited, being the lowest bidder meeting the specifications of Request for Tender Ariba Document Number 3032617265, Contract Number 21-PFR-054, for the supply of all materials, equipment, labour, and supervision necessary for the construction of North East Scarborough Community Recreation Centre and Joyce Trimmer Park Improvements, in the amount of $78,011,400 net of all taxes and applicable charges, or 88,152,882 including Harmonized Sales Tax and all applicable charges ($79,384,401 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) and in accordance with the Request for Tender requirements.

 

2. City Council authorize the following increases to the approved 2021 Capital Budget and 2022-2030 Plan to proceed with the award of construction for the North East Scarborough Community Recreation Centre (including Child Care Centre) and Joyce Trimmer Park Improvements:

 

a. amend the Parks, Forestry and Recreation's Capital Budget and Plan to increase the project cost of the North East Scarborough New Community Recreation Centre Construction sub-project in the Community Centre project, by $19.736 million from $57.200 million to $76.936 million, with cash flow in year 2024 from Parks, Forestry and Recreation Development Charges (XR2114); and

 

b. amend Children's Services Capital Budget and Plan to increase the project cost of the North East Scarborough Recreation Centre project by $1.500 million from $5.800 million to $7.300 million, with cash flow in year 2024 from the Childcare Capital Reserve Fund (XR1103).

Origin

(November 9, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Children's Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the results of the Request for Tender Ariba Document Number 3032617265, Contract Number 21-PFR-054, issued for the supply of all materials, equipment, labour, and supervision necessary for the construction of the North East Scarborough Community Recreation Centre, which includes a Child Care Centre and Joyce Trimmer Park Improvements, and to request authority of City Council to award a contract to Aquicon Construction Company Limited, being the lowest bidder meeting the specifications set out in the Request for Tender in the amount of $78,011,400 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($79,384,401 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).

 

In order to proceed with the award of the Request for Tender, authority from Council is required to amend the approved 2021-2030 Capital Budgets and Plans for Parks, Forestry and Recreation and Children's Services by increasing project costs and future year cash flow commitments contained within the 10-Year Capital Budget and Plan to advance the construction of the North East Scarborough Project.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 9, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, the General Manager, Children's Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management on Award of Request for Tender Ariba Document Number 3032617265 to Aquicon Construction Company Limited for the Construction of the North East Scarborough Community Recreation Centre and Joyce Trimmer Park Improvements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173256.pdf

GL27.10 - Non-Competitive Contract with Resolve Software Group Canada Incorporated for the City's Labour Relations Information System

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Chief People Officer, People and Equity to negotiate and execute a non-competitive three (3) year agreement, commencing from the date that the contract is issued, with two (2) additional separate one (1) year option renewals with Resolve Software Group in the amount of $909,843 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($925,857 net of Harmonized Sales Tax Recoveries), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief People Officer, People and Equity and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Chief People Officer, People and Equity, the Chief Technology Officer, Technology Services, and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request City Council authority to enter into a non-competitive contract with Resolve Software Group to purchase a proprietary case management system of software licenses and professional services for the City's Labour Relations Information System. The contract will be for an initial period of three (3) years commencing from the date that the contract is issued to December 31, 2024, with two (2) additional separate one (1) year option renewals, in the total amount of $909,843 net of Harmonized Sales Tax ($925,857 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).

 

The Employee Relations section of the People and Equity Division develops and maintains harmonious working relationships among managers, employees, unions and staff associations. Employee Relations administers the requirements of the collective agreements for various unions, manages the collective bargaining process, and provides expertise in resolving conflict and grievances.

 

Employee Relations utilizes a City developed software system, known as the Grievance Tracking System, for effectively tracking, managing and solving numerous enquiries, concerns and complaints/grievances. This system was introduced in 2004. The current version of Grievance Tracking System was never intended to be a long-term solution, rather it was an interim system until a modernized solution was procured. During the pandemic, the project to replace Grievance Tracking System with a modern system, was placed on hold due to various immediate priorities. Remote work has made it even more challenging to manage the day to day business demands of Employee Relations, using an outdated and manual system.

 

In 2013, the City's Internal Audit Division conducted a review of the Employee Relations grievance and arbitration processes and identified a number of areas of improvements with the City's developed Grievance Tracking System, including reporting inefficiencies and lack of cost tracking. It was recommended for the Grievance Tracking System be updated to reflect the current information needs of Employee Relations and the Employee Labour Relations Committee.

 

In 2019, Employee Relations and Technology Services Division conducted an in-depth analysis of the current and future state of the Grievance Tracking System. This included an analysis of the Grievance Tracking System and a market assessment to find a solution that could satisfy the business requirements of Employee Relations and address the gaps. The existing Grievance Tracking System was reviewed as an option, however, it was built internally 17 years ago in the City with limited capabilities and functionalities. The City staff conducted a market assessment1 comparing several vendor products of similar capabilities. The vendor products reviewed did not meet all the business capabilities and criteria for Employee Relations, whereas the Resolve Software Group (Resolve) case and complaints management solution met all the business requirements to replace the Grievance Tracking System as the new Labour Relations Information System.  

 

In addition, within the City of Toronto, Resolve is used in the Accountability Offices, such as the Ombudsman Toronto and the Toronto Lobbyist Registrar. Resolve is also being implemented at the Human Rights Office within the People and Equity division of the City.  Leveraging an existing solution already in use at the City, such as the case with Resolve, will help ensure People and Equity can effectively meet the mandate aligned to employee relations, while optimizing usage of common technology platforms across the City.  

 

Resolve is also used in other Municipal governments who require case and complaint management solutions, including the following offices in British Columbia - Office of the Ombudsperson, Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner, Office of the Merit Commissioner and Office of the Police Complaint Commissioner. A unique business requirement of these government partners is Resolve's ability to handle sensitive workplace matters and investigations where individual cases contain confidential, highly sensitive information and strict adherence to regulatory compliance, which apply to the day day-to-day functions and operations of Employee Relations.  

 

In 2023, the collective bargaining process will commence for the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters Association, Local 3888 and in 2024, the collective bargaining process will commence for the Toronto Civic Employees Union (Local 416) and the Canadian Union of Public Employees (Local 79). The successful management of these collective bargaining processes is dependent on having a new Labour Relations Information System that will organize, track and document meeting minutes, strategies and planning and management of proposal exchanges between the City and the Union. The risks of not implementing the new system could expose the City to information breaches, financial impacts and increased reporting inaccuracies, as there is no cost tracking for settlements and arbitrations in the current Grievance Tracking System.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 195-

Purchasing, where the current request exceeds the Chief Purchasing Officer's authority of the cumulative five-year commitment for each supplier, under Article 7, Section 195-

7.3 (D) of the Purchasing By-Law or exceeds the threshold of $500,000 net of Harmonized Sales Tax

 

1 The market assessment was completed using Gartner Magic Quadrant research methodology. Gartner is a leading independent market research company: https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/magic-quadrant

 

allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 71- Financial

Control, Section 71-11A.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Chief People Officer, People and Equity, the Chief Technology Officer, Technology Services, and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management on Non-Competitive Contract with Resolve Software Group Canada Incorporated for the City's Labour Relations Information System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173394.pdf

GL27.11 - Amendment to Proposed Land Lease of Part of the City-Owned Property at 311 Staines Road to Tamil Community Centre

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park

Confidential Attachment - Contains confidential instructions to staff and legal advice from the City Solicitor relating to potential litigation

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the amendment of certain terms for the Land Lease between the City, as the Landlord, and the principals of the Tamil Community Centre, as the Tenant, for part of the south parcel of the City-owned property at 311 Staines Road, as outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor, and on such other terms and conditions to be agreed between the Landlord and the Tenant, as may be approved by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor.

 

3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor remain confidential in its entirety, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor

Summary

In October 2020, City Council authorized the City (as the "Landlord") to enter into a land lease (the "Land Lease") with the principals of the Tamil Community Centre (as the "Tenant") for part of the south parcel of the City-owned property at 311 Staines Road (the "Property") to construct a new community centre which will serve the community as a whole, while providing a focus on serving the Tamil community in particular.

 

This report seeks City Council approval to amend some of the terms of the previously approved proposed Land Lease to the Tamil Community Centre.

 

Confidential Attachment 1 contains confidential instructions to staff and legal advice from the City Solicitor relating to potential litigation.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the City Solicitor on Amendment to Proposed Land Lease of Part of the City-Owned Property at 311 Staines Road to Tamil Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173339.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

GL27.12 - Telling the City’s Stories - Engaging with External Parties

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council delegate authority to the Chief Communications Officer to negotiate and enter into on behalf of the City, agreements with third parties who develop and distribute content for commercial or non-commercial purposes ("Content Producers") for the City's participation in the production of media content in such form as appropriate in the opinion of the Chief Communications Officer, including the use of City resources and intellectual property by the Content Producer on an in-kind basis, where the Chief Communications Officer is satisfied that there is a sufficient benefit to the City from the production, including the indirect benefit to the City of providing information to the public about City operations, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Communications Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 
2. City Council authorize the Chief Communications Officer, and Division Heads, in consultation with the City Manager, and the City Clerk, as applicable, to take such actions in respect of City operations and the Content Producer's use of City resources and intellectual property as may be required to implement an agreement under Recommendation 1 above and comply with any legislative requirements (example: privacy) imposed on the City.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the City Manager

Summary

The Strategic Public and Employee Communications Division leads communications for all key City priorities, policies, services and programs. The Division brings a unified voice to a diverse City and provides expert advice and services to clearly communicate to the public, City Council, employees, media, and national and international audiences. Delivering effective and strategic communications builds trust and confidence in municipal government by ensuring that messages to the public are clear, consistent and support civic participation and understanding of Council priorities, emerging issues and City policies, programs and services.

 

With one of the world's most diverse populations, Toronto residents, businesses and visitors now consume information from a more diverse media landscape. The information and media landscape has evolved dramatically over the past twenty years and now, people no longer rely solely on print newspapers, TV and radio. In fact many people now consume news and information from a variety of sources such as the internet, social media, podcasts, features, documentaries, infotainment and investigative journalism. According to Global Web Index (Third Quarter 2020 – Second Quarter 2021), 30 percent of Canadians spend at least 30 minutes daily with online press compared to only 18 percent who read print press at least 30 minutes each day, and one-third of Canadians use social media as a news source.

 

To help strengthen and modernize how Strategic Public and Employee Communications tells the City’s stories, the City Manager is recommending delegated authority be given to the Chief Communications Officer to enter into agreements with third parties interested in telling City stories in a variety of media. Through this delegated authority, the Chief Communications Officer will be empowered to seek out, respond to and build on City storytelling to enable greater public understanding and engagement with City services.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report from the City Manager on Telling the City’s Stories - Engaging with External Parties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173393.pdf

GL27.13 - 220 Attwell Drive - Amending the Municipal Capital Facility Designation for the Property Used by Toronto Employment and Social Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
1 - Etobicoke North
Attention
Bill 1028 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council pass a by-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:

 

a. enter into an amended Municipal Capital Facility Agreement between 3052690 Nova Scotia Limited, the landlord, which leases the entire property, comprising of approximately 20,396 square feet of the existing leased space and 7,040 additional square feet at 220 Attwell Drive (the "Leased Premises") to the City of Toronto, used for social and health services;

 

b. exempt the Leased Premises from taxation for municipal and school purposes, with the tax exemption being effective from the latest of:

 

i. the commencement date of the lease;

 

ii. the date the Municipal Capital Facility agreement is entered into;

 

iii. the date the Tax Exemption By-law is enacted.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

This report seeks City Council's authority for the adoption of the necessary amending by-law to designate the entire property owned by 3052690 Nova Scotia Limited (the "Landlord") at 220 Attwell Drive and currently leased to City of Toronto as a Municipal Capital Facility, and to provide an exemption for municipal and education taxes. The amending Municipal Capital Facility agreement authorized by the amending by-law will provide for a continued exemption for the existing space occupied by Toronto Employment and Social Services of approximately 20,396 square feet (exempted by By-law 630-2011) and a new exemption for an additional 7,040 square feet of space that is occupied by Toronto Employment and Social Services as of February 22, 2012 (the date the original Municipal Capital Facility agreement was entered into).

 

The additional space was required as part of  Toronto Employment and Social Service's greater City-wide project to ensure clients were fully supported in their efforts to seek employment. The City of Toronto introduced or improved 10 Toronto Employment and Social Services offices at the time to ensure uniformity in each office. Toronto Employment and Social Services continues to deliver their services under the same model.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on 220 Attwell Drive - Amending the Municipal Capital Facility Designation for the Property Used by Toronto Employment and Social Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173317.pdf

GL27.14 - 154 University Avenue - Designation of a Portion of the Property Used by the Toronto Transit Commission as a Municipal Capital Facility

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1029 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council pass a by-law pursuant to section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:

 

a. enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with Slate Toronto Core Office Incorporated, which leases approximately 2,070 square feet plus one parking spot at 154 University Avenue to the Toronto Transit Commission, all space (the "Leased Premises") related to the provision of telecommunications, transit and transportation systems and ancillary parking; and

 

b. exempt the Leased Premises from taxation for municipal and school purposes, with the tax exemption being effective from the latest of:

 

i. the commencement date of the Lease; 

 

ii. the date the municipal capital facility agreement is entered into; and

 

iii. the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the by-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Conseil Scolaire Viamonde, and the Conseil Scolaire Catholique MonAvenir.

Origin

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report seeks Council's authority for the adoption of the necessary by-law to designate a portion of a property leased and occupied by the Toronto Transit Commission as a municipal capital facility and to provide an exemption for municipal taxes and education taxes. The municipal capital facility agreement authorized by the by-law will provide an exemption for approximately 2,070 square feet of space plus one parking spot.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Controller on 154 University Avenue - Designation of a Portion of the Property Used by the Toronto Transit Commission as a Municipal Capital Facility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173384.pdf

GL27.15 - Designation of the Properties Used by Shelter, Support and Housing Administration as Municipal Capital Facilities

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
4 - Parkdale - High Park, 7 - Humber River - Black Creek, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 13 - Toronto Centre, 23 - Scarborough North
Attention
Bill 1030 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council pass a By-law pursuant to Section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:

 

a. enter into Municipal Capital Facility Agreements with the landlords of each of the nine properties with whom Corporate Real Estate Management has a lease or license on behalf of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (each a "Leased Premises"), with respect to approximately 632,866 square feet of combined space and ancillary parking, if any, for the purposes of providing municipal capital facilities related to the provision of facilities used for social and health services, located at:

 

1. 14 Roncesvalles (Ward 4);


2. 30 Norfinch Drive (Ward 7);

 

3. 60 York Street (Ward 10);

 

4. 45 The Esplanade (Ward 10);

 

5. 92 Peter Street (Ward 10);

 

6. 65 Dundas Street East (Ward 13);

 

7. 56 Yonge Street (Ward 13);

 

8. 335 Jarvis Street (Ward 13); and

 

9. 20 Milner Business Court (Ward 23); and
 

b. exempt each Leased Premises from taxation for municipal and school purposes, with the tax exemption being effective from the latest of:

 

1. the commencement date of the Lease or Licence;

 

2. the date the Municipal Capital Facility Agreement is entered into; and

 

3. the date the Tax Exemption By-law is enacted.

 

2. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the By-law to the Minister of Finance, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir.

Origin

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Controller

Summary

This report seeks Council's authority for the adoption of the necessary By-laws to designate portions of nine properties leased to the City of Toronto for use as temporary shelters as Municipal Capital Facilities and to provide exemptions for municipal taxes and education taxes. The municipal capital facility agreements authorized by the By-laws will provide exemptions for approximately 632,866 square feet of combined space. The nine properties and their respective square footage are provided in Table 1 below.

 

Table 1 - Square Footage of Properties Used as Temporary Shelters

 

Property Address

Ward

Square Footage

14 Roncesvalles

4

16,000

30 Norfinch Drive

7

86,154

60 York Street

10

77,160

45 The Esplanade

10

167,749

92 Peter Street

10

85,456

65 Dundas Street East

13

97,507

56 Yonge Street

13

27,360

335 Jarvis Street

13

18,000

20 Milner Business Court

23

57,480

Total

 

632,866

 

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Controller on Designation of the Properties Used by Shelter, Support and Housing Administration as Municipal Capital Facilities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173306.pdf

GL27.16 - Extensions, Amendments and Update for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration COVID-19 Response Sites

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
4 - Parkdale - High Park, 7 - Humber River - Black Creek, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 23 - Scarborough North

Confidential Attachment - Confidential Attachment 1 refers to a position, plan or instruction to be applied to negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that: 

 

1. City Council authorize lease and licence extension and/or amendment agreements for the premises described in Attachment 1, substantially on the major terms and conditions outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and including such other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the General Manager of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council ratify the additional expenditures required under the lease at 45 The Esplanade retroactive to the commencement date less a $50,000.00 credit from the respective landlord, as detailed in the Financial Impact section.

 

3. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.

 

4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management upon the expiration of the last agreement of the hotels, as it contains instructions to be applied to negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

This report seeks City Council approval to enter into lease and licence extension and/or amendment agreements for leased and/or licensed premises at thirteen locations to accommodate Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's emergency response efforts to the COVID-19 pandemic. Shelter, Support and Housing Administration will bring a report to Council in the first quarter of 2022 that provides details on a transition plan to support the wind down of the Emergency Shelter Hotels after April 30, 2022.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Extensions, Amendments and Update for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration COVID-19 Response Sites
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173516.pdf
Attachment 1 - Lease and Licence Extensions and Amendments - Major Terms and Conditions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173517.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

Communications (City Council)

(December 15, 2021) Submission from Emily Derouin (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Diana Chan McNally, Training and Engagement Coordinator, Toronto Drop-in Network (TDIN) (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142770.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Submission from Diana Chan McNally, Toronto Drop-In Network (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142771.pdf
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Nathan Doucet (CC.New)

GL27.17 - Expropriation of a Portion of 350 Progress Avenue for Toronto Paramedic Services Station Access

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - Scarborough Centre

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, to continue negotiations for the acquisition of the property interest as set out in Appendix A to the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and shown as Part 1 in sketch PS-2021-031 attached as Appendix B to the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management (the "Property"), and authorize the initiation of the expropriation proceedings for the Property, for the purpose of constructing a primary access route to 330 Progress Avenue as well as for providing site services including domestic water, sanitary, storm water, hydro, telecommunications and ancillary works for the new Toronto Paramedic Services multi-function station.

 

2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, to serve and publish the Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Property to forward to the Ontario Land Tribunal any requests for inquiries received, to attend the hearing(s) to present the City of Toronto's position, and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for its consideration.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek authority from City Council ("Council") to commence expropriation proceedings to acquire a fee simple interest in the portion of the property municipally known as 350 Progress Avenue (the "Property"), for the purpose of providing a primary access route and site services via Schick Court to the new Toronto Paramedic Services multi-function station to be located at 330 Progress Avenue in Scarborough (the "Project"). City Council previously approved the expropriation of a property required for the Project. Staff have now revised the property interest required.

 

This is Stage 1 of the expropriation process. Should City Council adopt the recommendations in this report, City staff may serve and publish the Notice of Application for Approval to Expropriate on each registered owner. Owners, as defined in the Expropriations Act (the "Act"), will have 30 days to request a hearing into whether the City's proposed taking is fair, sound and reasonably necessary.

 

City staff may report back to City Council with a Stage 2 report, providing details on property values and other costs, and if a hearing is requested, the report of the Ontario Land Tribunal. The proposed expropriation would only be effected, after adoption by City Council, as approving authority, of the Stage 2 report, by registration of an expropriation plan, which would then be followed by the service of notices as required by the Act.

 

Before the City can take possession of the expropriated property, offers of compensation based on appraisal reports must be served on each registered owner.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report and Appendices A and B from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Expropriation of a Portion of 350 Progress Avenue for Toronto Paramedic Services Station Access
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173383.pdf

GL27.18 - Exhibition Place Hotel X Development - Phase 2 Lands

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Deals with a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto and the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1.  City Council approve a new lease (the "Phase 2 Lease") between the City of Toronto (the "Landlord"), Lakeshore Princess West Limited Partnership (the "Phase 2 Tenant"), and The Board of Governors, Exhibition Place (the "Board"), for a term commencing on the earlier of: (i) commencement of the excavation of the Phase 2 Lands in accordance with the necessary excavation permits issued by the City; and (ii) 90 days after the issuance by the City of all required excavation permits, which term will end co-terminous with the lease for the Phase 1 Hotel X development (the "Phase 1 Lease"), and will be substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix A to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place and Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, and such other and amended terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council approve, subject to the Site Plan Application review process developed for Exhibition Place by City Planning, the Phase 2 Tenant's design proposal for the Phase 2 Hotel and Performance Venue development as set out in the proposed design plan and situated on the Phase 2 Lands as provided for in Appendix A, titled "Terms and Conditions of Phase 2 Lease" to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place; Appendix A, titled "Schedule 1: Phase 2 Lands" to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place; Appendix A, titled "Schedule 1A: Site Plan of Leased Property" to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place; and Appendix A, titled " Schedule 4: Conceptual Design of Development" to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place.

 

3.  City Council direct the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, in consultation with the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to review the City of Toronto's community benefit initiatives and consider the inclusion of applicable components in the Phase 2 Development.

 

4. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place remain confidential in their entirety and not be released publicly until the end of the term of the Phase 2 Lease, as they pertain to a proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City and the Board.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place

Summary

Following the completion of a successful Request for Proposal process held in 2007, the City of Toronto and the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place (the "Board"), collectively as landlord, executed a 49-year lease agreement with two options, each to renew for a 25-year term (the "Phase 1 Lease") with Princes Gate Hotel Limited Partnership (the "Phase 1 Tenant") for the development of a new hotel on the Exhibition Place grounds. The first phase of Hotel X opened for operations on March 20, 2018, with the hotel development consisting generally of a 750,000 square foot podium and 29-floor tower that includes 404 rooms, and at least 350 underground parking spots.

 

Under the Phase 1 Lease, the Phase 1 Tenant had an option to lease certain additional lands to the west of the Phase 1 Lease lands for the development of second hotel tower. The Phase 1 Tenant exercised the option by written notice to the Board dated July 31, 2021. The proposed Phase 2 Hotel is permitted based on the approval of Council of the Phase 1 Hotel lease, which provided the Phase 1 Tenant with an option to develop a second hotel. However, as discussed below, the option under the Phase 1 Lease did not provide for the Performance Venue, now proposed by the Tenant for Phase 2.

 

This report recommends that City Council approve entering into a new lease (the "Phase 2 Lease") between the City, as the landlord, and Lakeshore Princess West Limited Partnership (the "Phase 2 Tenant") for the development and operation of a hotel and performance venue on the Phase 2 Lands, based on the negotiated terms and conditions included in this report under Appendix A and Confidential Attachments 1 and 2, as approved by the Board, subject to obtaining the necessary City authorization, by adoption of Item EP20.1 at its meeting of October 29, 2021.

 

The proposed second phase expansion of the Hotel X facility (the "Phase 2 Development") would be located to the west of Stanley Barracks on the south side of Princes' Boulevard, along the Toronto Waterfront at Exhibition Place, as shown in Appendix A - Schedule 1 (the "Phase 2 Lands"), and includes approximately 750,000 square feet of space comprised of:

 

- A 400-room hotel (360,000 square feet) (the "Phase 2 Hotel");


- Underground parking of approximately 350 spaces (200,000 square feet);  


- A 6,600 to 7,000 seat auditorium-style entertainment performance venue (190,000 square feet) (the "Performance Venue").
 

CreateTO has reviewed the proposed deal and support the staff recommendations for City Council approval. Pending City Council approval of the recommendations in this report, a future Site Plan Application will be subject to review through City Planning and the approval of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division. City and Exhibition Place staff will complete the negotiations of the Phase 2 Lease and will work with the Phase 2 Tenant to develop a community engagement strategy, in consultation with the local Councillor.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Report and Appendices A - B from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place on Exhibition Place Hotel X Development - Phase 2 Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173476.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2

GL27.19 - Update on Outstanding Vehicle-for-Hire Directives

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GL27.19b for information)

A communication has been submitted on this Item.

Second Item of business on Friday, December 17th

Bill 1049 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, Appendix C - Schedule 12, Municipal Licensing and Standards to maintain, throughout 2022, the temporary 75 percent reduction on the Vehicle-for-Hire Accessibility Fund Program regulatory charges, approved by Council in February 2021.

 

2. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with the Interim Director, Environment and Energy and The Atmospheric Fund, to establish a Vehicle-for-Hire group, under the already established Electric Vehicle Working Group, that brings relevant stakeholders together to develop a strategy to accelerate emissions reductions and electrification of the vehicle-for-hire industry, including considerations for equity and potential implementation challenges for any proposed advice; the results of this work shall be considered by the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards as an input to the development of any requirements or programs that seek to reduce emissions in the Vehicle-for-Hire industry. 

 

3. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to set a goal of Net Zero for 2030 for vehicles for hire, and to align the plans for vehicle electrification and emissions reduction to achieve this goal.

 

4. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to report back in the first quarter 2023 on recommended by-law updates and complementary programs to achieve the vehicle electrification and emissions reductions targets for the vehicle-for-hire industry, including outcomes of the proposed Vehicle-for-Hire group under the Electric Vehicle Working Group, and results of the third-party vehicle-for-hire emissions study, with implementation beginning by the end of 2023.

 

5. City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire to reflect the amendments to Private Transportation Companies driver application, and Private Transportation Companies screening requirements outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.

 

6. City Council direct that the changes to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire, and Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, come into force on January 1, 2022.

 

7. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to establish a working group with representatives from across the taxi sector to understand and address any issues with data collection and submission.

 

8. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to review the feasibility of freezing fees for the drivers currently not working due to the drop in ridership demand caused by the pandemic and to report the recommendations to the January 14, 2022 meeting of the General Government and Licensing Committee.

 

9. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to require all Vehicle-for-Hire companies to submit comprehensive fare information to the city, including rate per ride and distance travelled, and the surge multiplier applied to both passenger fares and driver compensation.

 

10. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to provide anonymized data to the public through the City of Toronto’s Open Data Portal, such as provided by New York City and Chicago to reduce traffic congestion and greenhouse gas emissions and improve road safety, for all Vehicle-for-Hire trips, including time spent and distance travelled on each trip, by driver, with fares, broken down into the following but not limited to categories:

 

a. cruising;

 

b. en route; and

 

c. passenger transportation portions, and closest pick up and drop off intersections as provided by the city.


11. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to report back to Council in the First Quarter of 2022 with a plan for implementation and enforcement of the updated by-law to ensure compliance and the promotion of Vision Zero and road safety.

 

12. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to develop a framework for the vehicle-for-hire sector, supported by an independent report, to maximize the efficiency of the sector by matching active vehicles in service with demand, and balancing public policy priorities, including customer service, economic impacts on drivers, impacts on public transit, efforts to reduce traffic volumes, City policies such as TransformTO, ActiveTO, VisionZero, and our greenhouse gas reduction targets, and this framework therefore shall include, but not be limited to:

 

a. public availability and competitive impacts across transportation sectors;

 

b. equity and accessibility;

 

c. measurement and optimisation of service for disabled passengers;

 

d. environmental impacts, including environmental policies and imperatives, such as the congestion, greenhouse gas emissions, pollution and barrier impacts of transport provision;

 

e. safety impacts, including but not limited to public safety, individual pedestrian, driver and road user incident costs, and any mitigation thereto; and

 

f. any direct and associated socio-economic impacts, including the societal cost and benefits of such provision, as may include potential for and avoidance of monopolistic or anti-trust abuses as may result from excess market access, and/or uncontrolled pricing.


13. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to include in this framework, recommendations on the feasibility of applying a ratio of 1 vehicle to 100 population currently used in New York City with the fleet size being reached through attrition rather than driver deactivations.

 

14. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Transportation Services to partner with the Toronto Transit Commission to study the impact of ride-hailing services on public transit, which builds on the City’s 2019 report “The Transportation Impacts of Vehicle-for-Hire in the City of Toronto” and specifically studies:

 

a. rides lost annually to ride-hailing since 2014;

 

b. ride loss projections based on:

 

i. anticipated growth of ride-hailing; and

 

ii. changing rider concerns during and after the pandemic;

 

c. the corresponding impact on fare revenue and, therefore, the Toronto Transit Commission operating budget;

 

d. changes to traffic congestion, vehicle kilometres travelled (including commuting, cruising, on route and in-service time) by Private Transportation Company vehicles and corresponding effect on Toronto Transit Commission surface transit caused by the growth of ride-hailing apps;

 

e. strategies and solutions to remain competitive in the mobility ecosystem when coming up against ride hailing companies; and

 

f. the potential synergies with ride hailing companies that could drive mutual economic benefits.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Government and Licensing Committee requested the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to report to the meeting of City Council on December 15 and 16, 2021 with recommendations on potential refinements to the new driver training program in regards to:

 

a. requiring that all vehicle-for-hire and private transportation company driver training be provided through existing, accredited, public institutions and include in-car examinations;

 

b. providing acknowledgement and a training credit for drivers previously trained by the City's training program;

 

c. providing drivers who are currently licensed to operate but who have not received training top priority for the new training program; and

 

d. including education on sexual assault and harassment prevention.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

The Vehicle-for-Hire Bylaw (Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles-for-Hire) came into effect in 2016 to establish a set of rules and regulations for taxicabs, limousines, and Private Transportation Companies such as Facedrive, Lyft and Uber. The bylaw modernized the City of Toronto's approach to regulation, and responded to the public's request for choice in regulated ground transportation options. The bylaw enables the Vehicle-for-Hire industry to provide quality service in a competitive market, while maintaining the City’s municipal regulatory purpose of enhancing consumer protection and public safety.

 

In 2019, staff completed a comprehensive review of the bylaw and as a result, Council adopted several amendments, including the creation of an Accessibility Fund Program, the introduction of additional data requirements, new mandatory training for all drivers, and an increase in the years of driving experience for all drivers from one to three years. This report outlines work completed since the 2019 review, and provides updates and next steps related to outstanding Council directives. It also provides the results of a third-party licensing fee review, and an updated Transportation Impact Study.

 

With the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020, the implementation of some 2019 bylaw amendments paused, as residents, businesses and the City responded to the health, social and financial effects of the pandemic. For example, the Vehicle-for-Hire industry continues to recover from the financial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. The number of drivers in the industry has fallen, by almost 50 percent for Private Transportation Companies (from approximately 90,000 to 47,000) and 42 percent for the taxicab and limousine industries (from approximately 13,000 to 7,500).

 

To continue to support its recovery, staff recommend maintaining the temporary 75 percent reduction on the Vehicle-for-Hire Accessibility Fund Program's regulatory charges, approved by Council in February 2021, for the year 2022. This recommendation will not affect current or future access to the Accessibility Fund Program by applicants, and will not have an effect on the delivery of accessible Vehicle-for-Hire service, due to the City's previous in-year budget adjustment.

 

Based on a third-party licensing fee review, further reductions in licensing fees are not recommended. Vehicle-for-Hire licensing fees were determined to be reasonable, when compared to similar risk and/or administratively complex business licensing categories, and were within market rates, when compared to other jurisdictions. Council has also introduced a number of relief measures for the taxicab and limousine industries, including a 50 percent reduction on licensing renewal fees. If this reduction is maintained, meaning Council does not reinstate taxicab and limousine licensing renewal fees to be cost-recovery, then staff advise that the reduction should be extended to the Private Transportation Companies industry to avoid the characterization that Municipal Licensing and Standards is cross-subsidizing licensing fees.

 

Municipal Licensing and Standards is actively working on steps to implement the driver training accreditation program. After pausing the implementation of the training program due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, Municipal Licensing and Standards re-issued the call for third-party providers on November 9, 2021. Upon its closing on December 10, 2021, Municipal Licensing and Standards will review their applications in consultation with the Expert Panel (composed of interdivisional members) and then accredit approved training programs. It is anticipated that all drivers in the Vehicle-for-Hire industry will be trained by the end of 2022.

 

On November 10, 2021, Council paused the issuance of new Vehicle-for-Hire and Private Transportation Companies driver licences until such time as the driver training accreditation program is established, and applicants have demonstrated completion of a driver training course. While staff have implemented Council direction, there are concerns that pausing the issuance of licences will have significant impacts on the industry, drivers, individual applicants and consumers, at a time when the focus is necessarily on the City's recovery efforts. A pause on licensing may have unintended effects on consumers by potentially reducing the number of drivers available and increasing wait times. For example, due to the significant decline in the number of Private Transportation Companies drivers, wait times have more than doubled since February 2020. It is anticipated that the licensing of new applicants will resume once the City has accredited training providers and applicants are able to complete an accredited driver training course, as well as meet all other licensing requirements, as part of their applications. Municipal Licensing and Standards will continue to accept renewal applications for existing licensees during this time period. After training programs are in place and available, Municipal Licensing and Standards will establish a reasonable date by which applicants for renewal must also demonstrate they have completed a course.

 

The focus of the new training is to improve driver awareness of customer service issues, such as accessibility, the act of pick-up and drop-off, anti-racism and increased sensitivity. The City does not train drivers on core driving skills but instead utilizes criminal background and judicial matters checks, and weekly screening of driving abstracts to identify contraventions of the City's screening criteria (including convictions under the Ontario Highway Traffic Act).

 

To further advance emissions reductions in the Vehicle-for-Hire industry, Municipal Licensing and Standards has partnered with the University of Toronto to undertake an emissions calculations and modelling project. The amount of greenhouse gas emissions generated by Toronto's Vehicle-for-Hire industry is currently unknown, particularly in comparison to other transportation sources such as personal vehicles. Establishing an emissions baseline for the industry is critical as the City considers the most effective policy options and initiatives to meet emissions reduction targets and goals set out by Council in TransformTO. In addition, a baseline analysis is critical to determining the most effective and equitable policy options, as some emissions reduction initiatives may have financial implications on drivers, and this is typically an industry of already low-wages.

 

While the University of Toronto project is underway, Municipal Licensing and Standards remains committed to collaborating further with relevant stakeholders. It is recommended that Municipal Licensing and Standards lead, in consultation with the Environment and Energy Division and The Atmospheric Fund, an Electric Vehicle Working Group to discuss opportunities to support the electrification of the Vehicle-for-Hire industry, including considerations for equity and potential implementation challenges for any proposed advice. The results of this working group and the work of the University of Toronto will be considered as an input to policy recommendations that seek to reduce emissions from the Vehicle-for-Hire industry.

 

The Transportation Impact Study was revisited in 2021 by Transportation Service's Data and Analytics Unit. The study explored trends since the last study was completed in 2019, including the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Private Transportation Companies industry. It was determined that, at this time, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that additional measures are required to mitigate congestion, such as a cap on the number of Private Transportation Companies vehicles. In particular, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on traffic congestion and travel patterns in the City has been significant and requires continuous monitoring to understand how congestion levels recover and the role of Vehicle-for-Hire in the recovery.

 

Although the Vehicle-for-Hire Bylaw requires taxicab brokers, limousine service companies, and Private Transportation Companies to submit trip data to the City, currently, only the Private Transportation Companies industry and one taxicab broker complies in a satisfactory manner. This data is crucial for the City to be able to make policies governing the whole Vehicle-for-Hire around accessibility, transportation planning, congestion management and environmental initiatives. Therefore, staff will explore taking further enforcement action to achieve compliance with the data collection and remittance processes. It is also recommended that the Private Transportation Companies driver application and Private Transportation Companies screening requirements be amended to clarify and streamline the current data collection and record management requirements.

 

This report was prepared in consultation with Legal Services, Policy, Planning, Finance and Administration, Environment and Energy, and Transportation Services.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Update on Outstanding Vehicle-for-Hire Directives
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173388.pdf
Attachment 1 - Amendments to Private Transportation Companies Driver Application, and Private Transportation Companies Screening Requirements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173389.pdf
Attachment 2 - Third Party Market Comparison of Vehicle-for-Hire Licensing Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173390.pdf
Attachment 3 - Vehicle-for-Hire Public Safety Measures
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173391.pdf
(November 23, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting - Update on Outstanding Vehicle-for-Hire Directives
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173520.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 13, 2021) Supplementary report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on an Update on Outstanding Vehicle-for-Hire Directives (GL27.19b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174397.pdf

Speakers

Andrew Murie, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD Canada)
Eric Dumschat, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD Canada)
Kanwarmeet Gill
Allen Matrosov
Jake Brockman, Uber Canada
Shelagh Pizey-Allen, TTCriders
James Cooper, Transport Research Partners
Kristine Hubbard, Beck Taxi
Michael Geraghty, Canadian Pro Drivers
David Clement, Consumer Choice Center
Caleb V. Kalenuik
Tom Slee
Harmy Mendoza, WomanACT
JJ Fueser, RideFairTO
Brendan Agnew-Iler, RideFair
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Communications (Committee)

(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Gerry Manley (GL.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) Letter from Jake Brockman Manager, Public Policy, Uber Canada (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140493.pdf
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Sean Sportun, Chair I, Toronto Crime Stoppers (GL.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) Letter from Harmy Mendoza, Executive Director, Woman Abuse Council of Toronto (WomanACT) (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140507.pdf
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Kanwarmeet Gill (GL.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Mian Amjad (GL.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) Letter from Janet Joy Wilson, Albert Koehl, Mary Ann Neary, Toronto Community Bikeways Coalition (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140883.pdf
(November 29, 2021) Letter from Stephanie Cowle on behalf of Pamela Fuselli, Parachute (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140885.pdf
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from David Réti (GL.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Tom Slee (GL.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Nabeel El Khafif, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, ego (GL.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dr. James M. Cooper, Lead Scientist, Transport Research Partners (formerly Taxi Research Partners) (GL.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from JJ Fueser, RideFairTO, on behalf of the Toronto Environmental Alliance, CodeRedTO, The Toronto Community Bikeways Coalition and TTC Riders (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140947.pdf
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Earla Phillips (GL.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140949.pdf
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Margot Whittington, submitting a letter from Bryan Purcell, The Atmospheric Fund (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140950.pdf
(November 29, 2021) Letter from Julie Kim, Founder, Go Be Safe (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140964.pdf
(November 29, 2021) Letter from Chris Thomas, Lyft Public Policy (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140935.pdf
(November 29, 2021) Letter from Andrew Clement, Professor Emeritus, Faculty of Information Coordinator, Information Policy Research Program, University of Toronto (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140937.pdf
(November 30, 2021) Letter from Cara Clairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Plug'n Drive (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/comm/communicationfile-140938.pdf
(November 30, 2021) Letter from Michael Geraghty (GL.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) Letter from Yohannis Gebeyehu (GL.Supp)

Communications (City Council)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Muhammad Gill (CC.Main)
(December 14, 2021) Letter from JJ Fueser, Thorben Wieditz and Brendan Agnew-Iler, RideFair Toronto (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142861.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Brendan Agnew-Iler submitting a communication on behalf of Allam (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) Letter from Paul Meinema, National President, United Food and Commercial Workers Union (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142862.pdf

Declared Interests (Committee)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Nick Mantas - as one of his family members owns a taxi plate.
Written Declaration: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/declared-interest-file.do?id=10396

19a - Amendments to Private Transportation Company Driver Application Process

Confidential Attachment - Contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege
Origin
(November 17, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor
Summary

This report is supplementary to the report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, titled: Update on Outstanding Vehicle-for-Hire Directives. His report recommends that City Council adopt amendments to the Private Transportation Company Driver application process, as noted in Attachment 1 to that report. This confidential report and attachment contains legal advice on the existing and recommended record keeping requirements in Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 546, Licensing of Vehicles for Hire.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 17, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on Amendments to Private Transportation Company Driver Application Process
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173446.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

GL27.22 - Fleet Services' Report of the City of Toronto's Fleet Availability and Utilization Rates

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Fleet Services, in consultation with applicable City divisions, to make fleet utilization related data available on the City of Toronto's open data portal.

Origin

(November 15, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Fleet Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an update to the General Government and Licensing Committee on Fleet Services' actions of reducing vehicle and equipment downtime and minimizing the number of underutilized vehicles as requested by the General Government and Licensing Committee in the Fleet Services Division Overview on October 7, 2019 (Item 2019. GL8.1).

Background Information (Committee)

(November 15, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Fleet Services on Fleet Services' Report of the City of Toronto's Fleet Availability and Utilization Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173305.pdf

GL27.26 - 2020 Final Report on Property Sales, Acquisitions, Expropriations and Leases

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council receive the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management for information.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

This report provides an annual overview of real estate transactions previously executed by the Corporate Real Estate Management Division on behalf of the City of Toronto through the Delegated Authority Form process from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. Properties that were declared surplus, sold, acquired through negotiations or expropriations, as well as licences and leases, are summarized in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on 2020 Final Report on Property Sales, Acquisitions, Expropriations and Leases
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173318.pdf
Appendix A - 2020 Declared Surplus Properties and Appendix B - 2020 Properties Authorized for Sale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173319.pdf

GL27.27 - 2021 Update on Fire and Life Safety Compliance at the City of Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive the report (November 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management for information.

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Summary

This report provides an annual update on fire and life safety compliance at the City of Toronto, as directed by City Council (AU13.11). The report reviews the 2020 compliance, as assessed by an internal team of Quality Assurance and Risk Management Assessors, against the 2017, 2018 and 2019 baseline data. The assessment shows that both fire and life safety record completion and compliance rates continue to improve. Significant progress has been made in standardizing fire and life safety vendor work within City owned buildings.

 

In 2021, Corporate Real Estate Management continued to centralize and standardize fire and life safety services across the City. Despite challenges resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, Corporate Real Estate Management made significant progress implementing the Master Fire Program, and awarded a new competitive procurement for inspections, testing and maintenance services, and the recruitment of new staff to enable the new service model.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on 2021 Update on Fire and Life Safety Compliance at the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173341.pdf

GL27.29 - Status of Audit Recommendations and Key Cybersecurity Risks

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Involves the security of property belonging to the City of Toronto

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (November 19, 2021) from the Chief Information Security Officer remain confidential in their entirety, as they involve the security of property belonging to the City of Toronto.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Report from the Chief Information Security Officer

Summary

City Council requested the Chief Information Security Officer to report to the General Government and Licensing Committee on a biannual basis regarding the City-wide cyber security program. This is the first such report and includes two confidential attachments:

 

- Attachment 1 - Describes the City's Cyber health as seen from three lenses: cyber resilience, cyber maturity, and cyber awareness.
 

- Attachment 2 - Provides an overview of audit remediation status.
 

Further, these attachments provide details on:

 

a.  Overall cyber health of the organization, the progress made in the past six month and the benefits/efficiencies achieved as a result of the Cyber program implementation, including embedding "cybersecurity by design" principles to support the City's modernization efforts;

 

b.  The status of all outstanding audit recommendations that have not been implemented to date, including any increase to the City's cybersecurity risk profile

 

c.  Additional supports required to address cybersecurity risks in an expedited manner.

 

Subsequent reports to the  General Government and Licensing Committee will include updates on the following:

 

Projects, initiatives, procurement, and operations where cybersecurity requirements or directives were not included in the process
 

The attachments also include highlights of the progress the Office of the Chief Information Security Officer (OC) has made, in collaboration with Technology Services Division and the City's critical infrastructure Divisions, in embedding cyber security risk management practices in their projects, initiatives, procurement, and operations.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Report from the Chief Information Security Officer on Status of Audit Recommendations and Key Cybersecurity Risks
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173540.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2

Background Information (City Council)

Confidential Attachment to motion 1 by Councillor Stephen Holyday

GL27.30 - Kennels - Let Every Dog have its Day - Even at a Kennel

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards and the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning, to develop a plan to license kennels in Toronto and to report in the Second Quarter 2022 to the General Government and Licensing Committee on that plan and any possible interim steps needed to address problems created by a small portion of kennel operators in Toronto.

Origin

(November 10, 2021) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 14 - Toronto-Danforth

Summary

Pets are well cherished by and an important part of the lives of many Torontonians.  A November 2015 City staff report, LS8.2 - Responsible Dog Ownership - Results of Consultation, estimated that there were 230,000 dogs, for example, in the city and that number has likely grown considerably since especially during the pandemic.

 

The humane treatment of animals, including pets, is a key principle of our society. City Council has taken many steps over the years to embrace this principle and enhance the treatment of pets in Toronto – from dog off leash areas to pet microchipping programs and rules on how long a dog can be tethered.

 

Fostering community harmony around pet ownership has been another policy goal of the City Council.  This has resulted in, amongst other things, rules about keeping dogs on leashes in public, poop and scoop regulations, and dog licensing.  However the City does not currently license dog kennels.

 

While Most kennel operators in Toronto provide a wonderful and vital service.  However, a few bad apples can pose a problem for pets, pet owners and the kennel's neighbours.

 

There have been reports are reports of pet owners complaining about the poor treatment of their pets boarded at kennels.  Some kennel operators are not good neighbours and operate in areas where the zoning does not permit them. Current measures designed to address these issues have proven insufficient.

 

Other Ontario municipalities, like Ottawa, do license and regulate kennels.  As well, the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association publishes a Code of Practice for Canadian Kennel Operations which deals with breeding kennels not just boarding kennels. Drawing on these examples, the City should be able to begin to develop measures to address this policy shortfall.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2021) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 14, Toronto-Danforth on Kennels - Let Every Dog have its Day - Even at a Kennel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173357.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (GL.Supp)

GL27.31 - Acquisition of Commercial Lands at 120 Varna Drive for Community Space

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Committee Recommendations

The General Government and Licensing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to consider the purchase of the 13,000 sq. ft. retail unit at 120 Varna Drive to develop a community space for tenants and agencies to deliver programs and expand the availability of much-needed accessible community space in Lawrence Heights.

Origin

(November 17, 2021) Letter from Councillor Mike Colle, Ward 8, Eglinton-Lawrence

Summary

In Spring of 2021, the Lawrence Heights Safety Action Plan was created by Mayor John Tory's roundtable with Councillor Mike Colle, Chief of Police James Ramer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, and representatives from Transportation Services and Social Development, Finance and Administration. One of the major recommendations was the urgent need for a community space in Lawrence Heights for residents to meet and collaborate on safety initiatives for Lawrence Heights.

 

Ground floor retail space at 120 Varna Drive, currently owned by Heights Development, is available for sale. The space is approximately 13,000 square feet, and is situated at the base of a new, privately-owned residential condominium building that has been built as part of the revitalization of Lawrence Heights.

 

This retail unit at 120 Varna Drive provides a unique opportunity for a community space to assist in coordinating community safety initiatives and implementing community economic development initiatives in Lawrence Heights.

 

Given the opportunity to invest in longer-term safety and economic outcomes, some considerations for the space should include:

 

- Ownership opportunities for equity-seeking groups;


- Supporting groups that have a similar vision for economic growth for Lawrence Heights and groups that might have historical connection to the community;


- Having this be a city-operated space that can drive economic development for the community.
 

As part of Toronto Community Housing Corporation’s commitment to economic and social development, Toronto Community Housing Corporation will continue to work with the City and key employment partners to drive economic advancement in Lawrence Heights, particularly in next phase of the Lawrence Heights revitalization.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 17, 2021) Letter from Councillor Mike Colle, Ward 8, Eglinton-Lawrence on Acquisition of Commercial Lands at 120 Varna Drive for Community Space
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173359.pdf
(November 29, 2021) Revised Letter from Councillor Mike Colle, Ward 8, Eglinton-Lawrence on Acquisition of Commercial Lands at 120 Varna Drive for Community Space
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-173916.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Lise Olds (GL.Supp)

Infrastructure and Environment Committee - Meeting 26

IE26.3 - Amendment to Purchase Order Number 6043932 with Drainstar Contracting Limited for Construction Services for the Basement Flooding Protection Program Storm and Sanitary Sewer Improvements and Watermain Replacement on Bestview Drive, Goldenwood Road, Harrington Crescent and Kentland Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North

Confidential Attachment - This report is about litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto. The attachment to this report contains advice or communications that relate to litigation or potential litigation.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management.

 

2. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management remain confidential in its entirety, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege and pertains to litigation or potential litigation.

 

3. City Council authorize an amendment to amend Purchase Order Number 6043932 issued to Drainstar Contracting Limited, for the provision of construction services for storm and sanitary sewer improvements and watermain replacement on Bestview Drive, Goldenwood Road, Harrington Crescent, and Kentland Crescent as part of the Basement Flooding Protection Program by the amount of $400,000 net of all taxes and charges ($407,040 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries), revising the current Purchase Order value from $7,650,388 net of all taxes and charges ($7,785,034 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) to $8,050,388 net of all taxes and charges ($8,192,074 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to amend Purchase Order Number 6043932 issued to Drainstar Contracting Limited, as a result of Request for Tender Number 49-2016 for Contract Number 16ECS LU 05FP, for the provision of construction services for storm and sanitary sewer improvements and watermain replacement on Bestview Drive, Goldenwood Road, Harrington Crescent, and Kentland Crescent as part of the Basement Flooding Protection Program.

 

A Purchase Order Amendment of $400,000 net of all taxes and charges ($407,040 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) is being requested, revising the current Purchase Order value from $7,650,388 net of all taxes and charges ($7,785,034 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries) to $8,050,388 net of all taxes and charges ($8,192,074 net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries).

 

This Purchase Order Amendment is necessary to address an overrun on the tendered quantity for the "Disposal of Asbestos-Containing Asphalt in accordance with Ministry of the Environment Asbestos Waste Disposal Requirements", as a result of asbestos-containing asphalt being found on additional streets paved within the contract area.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management on Amendment to Purchase Order Number 6043932 with Drainstar Contracting Limited for Construction Services for the Basement Flooding Protection Program Storm and Sanitary Sewer Improvements and Watermain Replacement on Bestview Drive, Goldenwood Road, Harrington Crescent and Kentland Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173682.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

IE26.4 - Award of Negotiated Request for Proposals to Various Suppliers for the Provision of Winter Maintenance Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (IE26.4a for information).

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee:

 

1. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to consult with the Auditor General on this contract award process, and to report to directly to the December 15 and 16, 2021 City Council meeting on their findings.

Origin

(November 23, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the results of the Negotiated Request for Proposals Doc2970598171 and Doc3136860258, as well as a non-competitive procurement for the provision of winter maintenance services, for all roads, sidewalks and cycling infrastructure types including anti-icing, de-icing, plowing and snow removal, and to request authority for the General Manager, Transportation Services to enter into agreements commencing October 2022 to April 2029, with three (3) additional separate option years to April 2032, with the recommended Suppliers meeting the requirements set out in the Negotiated Request for Proposals.

 

Transportation Services currently provides annual winter maintenance services on approximately 5,600 km of roads, 6,960 km of sidewalks, and 940 km of bike lanes/trails/routes, which makes up the transportation network. The majority of winter maintenance is delivered by private contractors. Presently, there are 47 contracts under a 7-year term, which the City manages on a seasonal basis and are due to expire at the end of the 2021/2022 season (April 2022). Winter maintenance contracts are expected to maintain a safe transportation network that is efficient for all road users during the winter months and ensure that the City meets its legislative requirements under the Provincial Maintenance Standards, in addition to City Council's mandated Level of Service.

 

Transportation Services embarked on a process to review the existing winter services contracts with an aim to consolidate, adjust and provide specific and measureable performance measures with enhancements. On October 27, 2020, City Council adopted the Auditor General's Report of the Winter Road Maintenance Program along with a set of recommendations focused on improving the design, management and adherence to service levels.  These City Council approved directions informed this procurement for winter services contracts. 

This procurement is intended to set the foundation for partnerships that leverage the industry and best practices, while increasing performance and quality of work delivered by winter service suppliers.

 

This Negotiated Request for Proposals was developed as a strategic sourcing initiative led by the Purchasing and Materials Management Division's Category Management and Strategic Sourcing unit working with Transportation Services staff and external consultant support.

 

As a result of this sourcing initiative, the City will benefit from better contract controls around Global Positioning System and key performance metrics to hold Suppliers accountable in terms of contract requirements. Other potential benefits include value added services provided by Suppliers such as access to dash camera footage to respond to claims, an insurance rebate, volume discounts, LiDAR (Light detection and ranging) technology to weigh salt quantities, leasing revenue in the off season to store equipment on site, and a pilot to reduce the number of vehicles required for plow teams on expressways.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management on Award of Negotiated Request for Proposals to Various Suppliers for the Provision of Winter Maintenance Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173608.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 14, 2021) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management on Award Report for Various Suppliers for the Provisions of Winter Maintenance Services (IE26.4a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174414.pdf
Attachment 1 - Audit of Winter Road Maintenance Program 2022 Procurement Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174415.pdf

Speakers

Domenic Passalacqua, D. Crupi & Sons Limited
Dominic Crupi, D. Crupi & Sons Limited
Cosimo Crupi, D. Crupi & Sons Limited
Jim Hurst, Steed and Evans Limited
Anthony Rossi, Coco Paving Inc.
Rick Logozzo, Coco Paving Inc.

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) Letter from Anthony Rossi and Rick Logozzo, Coco Paving Inc. (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141998.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Jim Hurst, President, Steed and Evans Limited (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142014.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Dominic Crupi, D. Crupi & Sons Limited (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142094.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Domenic Passalacqua C.Tech , General Manager, D. Crupi & Sons Limited (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142096.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Cosimo Crupi, D. Crupi & Sons Limited (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142168.pdf

IE26.5 - Non-Competitive Contract for Two-Way Radio Supply and Service with BearCom Canada Corporation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to negotiate and enter into a non-competitive agreement with BearCom Canada Corporation for the supply of two-way radios and accessories including a supplier-hosted two-way radio system and professionals services for installation, programming and repairs of the two-way radios for a period of 18 months with a 6 months optional extension, at the sole discretion of the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, commencing March 1, 2022 to February 28, 2024 for a grand total contract value of $374,370 net of all taxes and charges including estimated annual adjustment for consumer price index, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek authority from City Council for the General Manager Solid Waste Management Services to negotiate and enter into an 18 months non-competitive contract with a 6 months optional extension with BearCom Canada Corporation for the supply of two-way radios and accessories including a supplier-hosted two-way radio system and professional services for programming of the two-way radios.

 

The current contract 47020597 was issued to BearCom Canada Corporation as a result of the Request for Quotation Number 2104-17-0028 and scheduled to expire effective February 28, 2022.

 

The 18 months non-competitive contract with 6 months optional extension has a total potential value of $374,370 net of all taxes and charges, ($380,960 Net of Harmonized Sales Tax recoveries)

 

The non-competitive contract is required to address the ongoing global electronics shortage which has resulted in supply chain inconsistency, and severe inflation of pricing in the electronics market. By entering into this non-competitive contract Solid Waste Management Services can avoid the financial risk of having an over-valued contract which would be based off of the current inflated market value for radios. The division would also be avoiding any other procurement risks that may result from supply chain inconsistency.

 

In addition to mitigating financial and procurement risks, this non-competitive contract serves to ensure critical business continuity, as the radios are used operationally for the delivery of front line essential services.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management on Non-Competitive Contract for Two-Way Radio supply and Service with BearCom Canada Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173496.pdf

IE26.6 - Actions to Reaffirm Toronto's Tree Canopy Target

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Third Item of business on Friday, December 17th, to be considered with Item IE26.14

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council reaffirm Toronto's target of 40 percent tree canopy cover by 2050 to align with the City of Toronto's TransformTO NetZero Strategy.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to commission and select an official arboreal emblem for the City of Toronto in partnership with the Chief Communications Officer for Strategic Public and Employee Communications and the City Clerk's Office, following public engagement.

 

3. City Council request the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, to report back on any recommendations for enhanced enforcement of the requirement for soft landscaping on the City right-of-way or private property as set out in the City's Zoning By-law.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

Toronto's urban forest is a critical component of the city's green infrastructure. Trees provide a range of environmental, ecological, physical and mental health, social, cultural and economic benefits, and contribute to climate resiliency as recognized in the City’s TransformTO Net Zero Strategy. In addition to enhancing city streetscapes and providing habitat within parks, ravines, and natural areas, the urban forest provides valuable ecosystem services that improve the quality of life in the city. Some services include carbon sequestration, pollution removal, energy savings and avoided runoff, worth an estimated $55 million annually.

 

At its meeting on January 29, 2020, City Council adopted the 2018 Tree Canopy Study. This report responds to various motions adopted by City Council since that time, including addressing tree canopy at the neighbourhood scale; canopy expansion on private land; strengthening tree protection, monitoring LDD moth (European gypsy moth) and a reaffirmation of Toronto's canopy cover target of 40 per cent by 2050 to align with the City's TransformTO Net Zero Strategy. It also outlines a process for the creation of Toronto's first arboreal emblem using public feedback.

 

Urban Forestry's mandate is to maintain, protect, plant and plan for Toronto's urban forest. Through the analysis and use of data and evidence based decision making, action is being taken across the city to address the challenges underscored in the 2018 Tree Canopy Study. The introduction of a tree equity approach to planning and service delivery at the neighbourhood scale will help to address inequitable distribution of the urban forest. Ongoing investments that are being made in tree planting and stewardship will support canopy expansion on private property through the Urban Forestry Grants and Incentives program, since the greatest potential for canopy expansion exists on private land. The use of fees and fines to address compliance with the City's Tree By-laws, as well as public and industry education, are important components of a successful tree protection model. Updates on Compliance and Enforcement inspection fees and response times as well as enhanced educational materials are presented in this report. A status update on LDD moth monitoring and management is also provided.

 

The creation of an arboreal emblem to add to the City of Toronto's family of official symbols will underscore the significance of trees in Toronto and reaffirm our commitment to grow, enhance and protect the urban forest. Parks, Forestry and Recreation will support the City Clerk's Office and Strategic Public and Employee Communications to undergo public engagement and consultation with Toronto's diverse communities to determine a tree best suited to represent Toronto and to be included as one of Toronto's Official Symbols.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Actions to Reaffirm Toronto's Tree Canopy Target
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173560.pdf
Attachment 1 - CanopyTO, Revised
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173552.pdf
Attachment 2 - 2018 Tree Canopy Study - Technical Report, Revised
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173563.pdf
Attachment 3 - Tree Planting Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173554.pdf
Attachment 4 - Urban Forestry Grants and Incentives Program Impact Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173564.pdf

Speakers

Venita Indewey
Rebecca Wood
Sue Dexter
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141687.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Beth Moore (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Kathy OConnor (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ann Pascucci (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Lorna Moore (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Janet May on behalf of the Cliffcrest Scarborough Village SW Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141924.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Judy Gibson, Vice Chair, Long Branch Neighbourhood Association Chair, Tree Canopy Preservation and Enhancement Committee (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142070.pdf
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Gwen McIntosh and Peter Moore (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Steven Vella (IE.Supp)

Communications (City Council)

(December 12, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142489.pdf
(December 12, 2021) Letter from Cathie Macdonald, President, Deer Park Residents Group (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142493.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Kathrin Bohr, Executive Director, ABC Residents Association (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142548.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Donna and Sandy Donald (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Sheila Dunlop, Secretary, South Armour Heights Residents’ Association (SAHRA) (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142654.pdf

IE26.7 - Tree Maintenance Contracts (July 2023) - Increasing Competition and Performance Measurement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that: 

 

1. City Council receive the report (November 16, 2021) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management and the City Manager for information

Origin

(November 16, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management and the City Manager

Summary

The purpose of this report is to respond to Councils direction numbers 1, 8 and 29 of item AU8.6 "Getting to the Root of the Issues: A Follow-Up to the 2019 Tree Maintenance Service Audit", adopted with amendments at the April 7 and 8, 2021 City Council meeting.

 

Part A of this report addresses Council direction number 1 and 29 requesting an update on a cross-divisional and agency review of the delivery of insourced and outsourced environmental services, including forestry, horticulture, parks, and other outdoor maintenance. The objective of the review is to improve service, program design, organization, oversight, value, efficiency, procurement, and contract and resource management and the feasibility of City of Toronto staff providing tree maintenance services.

 

Part B of this report addresses Council direction number 8, to provide an update on the structure of the next Arboricultural Services Request for Proposal with a view to increasing competition and performance measurement.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 16, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management and the City Manager on Tree Maintenance Contracts (July 2023) - Increasing Competition and Performance Measurement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173437.pdf

IE26.8 - Construction Staging Area - 100-120 Broadway Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 15 - Don Valley West

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the north sidewalk and a 2.7 metre-wide portion of the westbound north-side curb lane on Broadway Avenue, between Redpath Avenue and a point 102 metres east, for a period of 13 months from December 16, 2021 to December 31, 2022.

 

2. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk and a 1.6 metre-wide portion of the northbound lane on Redpath Avenue, between Broadway Avenue and a point 74 metres north, for a period of 33 months from December 16, 2021 to August 31, 2022.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing no parking prohibition in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday on the north side of Broadway Avenue between a point 72.5 metres east of Redpath Avenue and a point 29.5 metres further east.

 

4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Broadway Avenue between a point 72.5 metres east of Redpath Avenue and a point 29.5 metres further east.

 

5. City Council rescind the existing maximum one-hour parking regulation, in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Friday, on the east side of Redpath Avenue, between Broadway Avenue and a point 74 metres north.

 

6. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Redpath Avenue between Broadway Avenue and a point 74 metres north.

 

7. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed, to keep clear of any construction debris and make them safe.

 

8. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkways have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

10. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

14. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

15. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

16. City Council direct the applicant to monitor and provide results of noise and vibration monitoring to the Work Zone Construction Coordination Unit, for the City to monitor and comment on.

 

17. City Council direct the applicant to provide monthly community meetings, to discuss any concerns raised by the community.

 

18. City Council direct that Broadway Avenue be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

19. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk and a 1.6 metre-wide portion of the northbound lane on Redpath Avenue, between Broadway Avenue and a point 74 metres north, for a period of 13 months from December 16, 2021 to December 31, 2022.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

This report is submitted to Infrastructure and Environment Committee as Broadway Avenue forms a shared boundary between the Toronto and East York Community Council and the North York Community Council.

 

Reserve Properties Limited is constructing 33 and 21 level condominium towers with a 9 level podium and a 36 level rental tower located on the north side of Broadway Avenue, between Redpath Avenue and Mount Pleasant Road.

 

The developer's anticipated timeline for a construction staging area requires a closure of the north sidewalk and a 2.7 metre-wide portion of the westbound north-side curb lane on Broadway Avenue, between Redpath Avenue and a point 102 metres east, for a period of 13 months (i.e., December 16, 2021 to December 31, 2022). The developer will also require a closure of the east sidewalk and a 1.6 metre-wide portion of the northbound lane on Redpath Avenue, between Broadway Avenue and a point 74 metres north, for a period of 33 months (i.e., December 16, 2021 to August 31, 2024).

 

Transportation Services is recommending the provision of an initial construction staging permit for 13 months (i.e., December 16, 2021 to December 31, 2022) and monitoring the need for construction staging and an extension as it is deemed necessary.

 

Pedestrian operations on the north side of Broadway Avenue will be maintained in a 2.1 metre-wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the existing westbound lane. The construction staging area on Broadway Avenue will result in the partial occupation of the westbound traffic lane, resulting in a 7.0 metre-wide lane for traffic.

 

Pedestrian operations on the east side of Redpath Avenue will be maintained in a 1.7 metre-wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the existing northbound lane. The construction staging area on Broadway Avenue will result in the partial occupation of the northbound traffic lane, resulting in a 3.5 metre-wide lane for northbound traffic and a 3.5 metre-wide lane for southbound traffic.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Construction Staging Area - 100-120 Broadway Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173595.pdf

IE26.9 - 2021 Cycling Network Plan Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications have been submitted on this Item.

To be considered with Item IE26.10

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council endorse, in principle, the new bikeway projects contained in the Near-Term Implementation Program (2022 – 2024) as outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services as the focus of Transportation Services' cycling budget and capital implementation program, including the initiation of feasibility analyses, public consultation, and detailed design.   

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to initiate the near-term studies of the Major City-Wide Cycling Routes as outlined in Attachment 3 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and to bring forward the findings of these studies and recommendations regarding future implementation at the appropriate time.

 

3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to work with the City Clerk and the City Solicitor on streamlining the process for submission of by-law changes and bills associated with Council-approved bikeways, in order to accommodate minor changes to the projects as may be necessary to address operational and safety issues as they may arise through the detailed design and implementation of approved bikeway process.

 

4. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, as part of the design, installation, and monitoring of new bikeway projects, to continue to work in consultation with the local Councillors, stakeholders, and residents to identify and implement changes to the bikeway projects contained in the Near-Term Implementation Program, before and after installation.

 

5. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to request, as part of the annual budget process, the capital funding required to implement the Near-Term Cycling Implementation Program (2022 - 2024),  as well as the operating budget required to fund the maintenance costs of newly constructed bikeways.

 

6. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider the feasibility of constructing a grade separated crossing of the Richmond Hill rail corridor, in consultation with Metrolinx, to connect the Finch Hydro Corridor Trail from Pineway Boulevard east to the Old Cummer GO station as part of the Finch Hydro Corridor Trail study.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Infrastructure and Environment Committee considered items IE26.9. and IE26.10 together.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Cycling Network Plan adopted by City Council in July 2019 seeks to build on the existing network of cycling routes to Connect gaps in the current network, Grow the network into new parts of the city, and Renew existing parts of the network to improve safety - with corresponding objectives and indicators for measuring and evaluating success.

 

The Cycling Network Plan consists of three components: a Long-Term Cycling Network Vision, the Major City-Wide Cycling Routes, and a three year rolling Near-Term Implementation Program. The plan components, objectives and indicators are aligned with a multitude of City policies including the Official Plan, TransformTO and the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan.

 

This report is a two year review of the Cycling Network Plan, as requested by City Council. It includes a status update of the 2019 - 2021 Near-Term Implementation Program, recommendations of new Major City-Wide Cycling Routes studies, and it seeks City Council endorsement of the 2022 – 2024 Near-Term Implementation Program. This report also includes additional recommendations to aid in the delivery of bikeways, and responds to a number of previous cycling-related motions.

 

The 2019 – 2021 Near-Term Implementation Program proposed 65 centreline kilometres of new bikeways and over 35 centreline kilometres of routes to be studied.

 

From 2019 to 2021, 65 centreline kilometres of new bikeways were installed:

 

- 35 centreline kilometres of cycle tracks;


- 11 centreline kilometres of bike lanes;


- 6 centreline kilometres of multi-use trails;


- 13 centreline km of neighbourhood routes (6 kilometres contra-flow bike lanes and 7 kilometres sharrows, along with traffic calming). 
 

There were also approximately 47 centreline kilometres of upgrades and enhancements to existing cycling routes installed.

 

Meeting the 2019 – 2021 Near-Term Implementation Program delivery goals was made possible by the ActiveTO Cycling Network Expansion Program in 2020 and 2021, which accelerated 27 centreline kilometres of bikeway projects. Without the ActiveTO program, Transportation Services would have fallen short of the Council directed Near-Term Implementation Program delivery goals.

 

While Transportation Services achieved the proposed targets, some of the ActiveTO routes displaced other projects originally identified for 2019 to 2021, so not every Near-Term Program project has been implemented.

 

The bikeway implementation over the past three years is unprecedented in Toronto's history and has resulted in faster progress towards the Cycling Network Plan's goal of having cycling accessible within close proximity (250 metres and 500 metres) of the City's population and jobs — 67.1 percent  in 2021 up from 62.8 percent in 2018. This percentage increase translates to approximately 180,000 more people living and working with close access to a cycling route than did in 2018.   

 

The demand for new bikeways in Toronto is high. City Council has directed Transportation Services through adopted policies contained in the TransformTO Climate Action Strategy, Vision Zero Road Safety Plan, the Toronto Office of Recovery and Rebuild’s COVID-19: Impacts and Opportunities report, as well as a number of project-specific motions to continue to accelerate the delivery of an unprecedented amount of new bikeways.

 

Since the adoption of the Cycling Network Plan in 2019, Toronto has faced new and deepening challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The pandemic has highlighted racial and socio-economic disparities in the City's health care, economic, and transportation systems. The inequitable outcomes of the current systems and past practices demonstrate the need to transform many of the City's systems including how transportation projects are planned and implemented, including bikeway projects delivered by the City.  

 

The prioritization framework used to identify bikeway projects for the Near-Term Implementation Program is informed by new and emerging equity analyses, such as crowded transit routes, locations of essential services, and areas of parkland need.

 

The 2022 – 2024 Near-Term Implementation Program forecasts the delivery of approximately 100 centreline kilometres of new bikeways, which is an increase over the 65 centreline kilometres delivered in 2019 - 2021.

 

To achieve these targets and continue improving upon previous implementation rates of high-quality bikeways, the following is recommended:

 

- Working towards a streamlined reporting process, where new projects would be approved by Council for implementation following community consultation with an appropriate level of detail in order to accommodate minor changes to the projects as they may arise through detailed design and implementation with submission of the Bills for the associated By-law changes to reflect the constructed project to follow when appropriate;


- Enhancements to public consultation plans and events, supported by greater resources and staffing levels;


- An annual capital budget of approximately $20 million, increasing annually as needed, in amounts to be confirmed in the annual capital budget process;


- Additional staff to support design, consultation, delivery/construction, and monitoring for the delivery of bikeway projects.

 

The 2022 – 2024 Near-Term Implementation Program includes an ambitious number of kilometres compared to previous years' delivery rates, and includes a greater proportion of cycle tracks on arterial roadways.

 
Toronto is well on its way to becoming a safer and more equitable cycling city. The recommendations in this report reflect achievable advancements within the City's current implementation framework. The 2022 – 2024 Near-Term Implementation Program projects will be meaningful additions to Toronto's transportation system, connecting thousands of Toronto residents to a safe bikeway network, and transforming over 100 centreline km of streets into safer, more resilient places.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on 2021 Cycling Network Plan Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173663.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map and Table of Completed Bikeways 2019 - 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173664.pdf
Attachment 2 - Part 1 - Map of Near-Term Implementation Program 2022 - 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173665.pdf
Attachment 2 - Part 2 - Table of Near-Term Implementation Program 2022 - 2024
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173666.pdf
Attachment 3 - Map and Table of Major City-Wide Cycling Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173667.pdf
Attachment 4 - Cycling Network Near-Term Program Prioritization Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173668.pdf
Attachment 5 - Maps of New and Updated Prioritization Considerations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173669.pdf
Attachment 6 - Transportation Equity Lens Tool
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173670.pdf
Attachment 7 - Project-specific Council Request Responses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173671.pdf

Speakers

Aaron Binder, Segway of Ontario
Robert Zaichkowski
Vanessa Gentile
Kevin Rupasinghe

Communications (Committee)

(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Chris P (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Keith Hlady (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Arnaud Seigne (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dana Molckovsky (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Meredith-Karam (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janice Fraser (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Wilson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Anita Wong (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jill Glessing (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Nikhil Gupte (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Caitlin Ella Wind (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Midanik (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Chris Hobson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Cory Freedman (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gilles Marchildon (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jack Alvo (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Leslie Beedell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Angela Bischoff (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jorge Chaves (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Patrick DeRochie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Warren Haas (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Naomi Hazlett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Avrum Jacobson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Mesbur (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Moore (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Robinson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Steve Thoms (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Michael Warren (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Judith Wiechula (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Federle (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from James Barker (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Clark Whitney (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mike Lawler (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Juanita De Barros (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kris Langille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andreas Wille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Soroush Arghavan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Liz Miller (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeff Sauer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Erica Buchanan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marie Clermont (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Penina Coopersmith (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Luke Franceschini (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tim Grant (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessie Gunn (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Albert Koke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Derek Laurendeau (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lumley Murray (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lori Newton (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Meg O'Mahony (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lucy Perri (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kirk Philipps (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tina Faibish (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maren Woweries-Diallo (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Martin Gagne (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from John Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Zoraida Anaya (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tamara Bernstein (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kendrick Paterson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Edik Zwarenstein (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Claus Lensbøl (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Eliza Brandy (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mark Fernando (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Lauren Blumas (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Debbie Green (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Daniel O'Donnell (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jagvir Brar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Holly Reid (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Hagit Fry (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Muroff (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mourtaza Alsammak (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Suzanne Aplin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Riccardo Caimano (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Dicker (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rory Hiles (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marie Jagu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Malcom Kennedy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Ann Kerwin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jason Milligan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Heather Pierce (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jarek Piokowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Christiane Schmidt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Pavlo Sirous (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Stokes (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Patrick N. (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ingrid Buday (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Oliver (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Delfina Ortega-Paredes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Louloua Habli (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Carmona-Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Niall Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Vandendam (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Bozek (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Julia Armstrong (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Laura Bast (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Randall Boyd (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Taras Gula (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kelly Ng (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Troth (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Ryan Rivera (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ruth Allen (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mark Altmeyer (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ling Chiu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Carmen Jones (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Janet Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Elaine Luu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Liz Rykert (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Senal Serasinghe (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jenny Sin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Meg Southee (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Cathleen Sullivan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Henriette Terness (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ketan Vegda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Georgina Wilcock (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Robert Yu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Rosemary Boissonneau (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jamie Liscombe (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cesar Shiao Mo (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janet Brooks (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Rob Dunder (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Vanessa Gentile (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Anne James (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Lewis (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Pat Martin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ivan Sherry (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Michael Szego (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Nadia Whitney (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timothy Lee (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alf Merson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brendan Hendel-McCarthy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Marc Marchild (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Anderson (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mario Maceda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ian Browne (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Arla Latto-Hall (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Shahnaz Stri-Shaikh (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Julia Chew (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Duane Currie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Peter Ellement (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rebeca Furtado (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Vilma Gianfelice (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Miles Gripton (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Howard Henderson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dafydd Hughes (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gerald Lazare (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Lombardi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Francesco Menghi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from James Rolfe (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Leigh Evan Silcox (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Patricia Slavinski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cameron Tingley (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Graham Lavender (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Shawnda Charron Nardia (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Dianne Saxe (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Spencer Roth (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matt Welke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ria Prakash (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jason Gallina (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Philipp Angermeyer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Melissa Avila (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Boaz Axelrad (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Hannes Bretschneider (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Michael Caldwell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthieu Caron (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Cooper (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Costa (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dorian Douma (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from T.J. Goertz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Herberman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Hunter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeremy Knowles (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arturo M. (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Chris Thom (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Davis (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tania Szablowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maryanne Stone-Jimenez (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeremy Lundy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bailey Chui (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Hasbany (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ruth Silver (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Hugo Cordeau (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dan Horchik (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Knoch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lara Arabian (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timna Ben-Ari (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Jayne (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Benjamin Lan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cliff Mewdell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alexei Miecznikowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maria Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrea Rae (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Adam Rosenfield (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathleen Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jim Crummey (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Hollett (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Carmen Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Reding (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gary Chow (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Ben Hanff (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Madeleine Sattler (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sam Arnold (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Norwin Anne (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ivana Marzura (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gavin Platt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Adam El-Masri (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Vanessa Faulkner (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Puru Panch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Puru Panch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrea Grochalova (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Gerry (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Meghan Cheng (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Victoria Adilman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Evan Gilbert (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Hobbs (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Fleming (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Peter Donnelly (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Parisa Bahramloueian (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Simon Andrews (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Loudon Young (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from D. Davis Landart (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sochi Fried (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dr. T. Tyler Luyben (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Elise Hug (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Ord (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Murumets (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Joey Carter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathy Laird (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Ilse Kramer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Schiller (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Rahul Mehta (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Michele Zuuring (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Argles (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Scottie Wildman (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from José Salvador (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mary Kainer (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Federle (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Cory Freedman (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Martin Gagne (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jill Glessing (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Nikhil Gupte (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Chris Hobson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gilles Marchildon (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Midanik (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Caitlin Ella Wind (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Anita Wong (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Sandra McCrossan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Avrum Jacobson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Todd Aalgaard (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Maisa Ribeiro Barbosa (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tristan Durie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brendan Hendel-McCarthy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arthur Klimiwicz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timothy Lee (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marcello Mancuso (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alf Merson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Ryan Rivera (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Greg Uchiyama (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mark Winter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tim Worrall (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Siobhan McLaughlin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Chris Heron (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bruce Novakowski (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Cynthia Wilkey (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ron Cuba (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Leo Petrazickis (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Anderson (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ian Browne (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Severine Cathelin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Steven Fistell (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Lynn Francis, Mark Lecker, etc (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Claire Hall (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jose La Rose (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mario Maceda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Marc Marchild (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Robert Staples (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Michael Stroud (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Elora Vink (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ginny Côté (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maciej Karlowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lori Spring (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gerrit Boerman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Stan Nikipierowicz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Neil Bartlett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Beryl Pilkington (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dana Snell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brian B.K.G (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Melvin Mariampillai (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Stewart Pearson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeffrey Levitt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Theresa Cooke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from David Nash (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Isaac Berman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bruce Bennett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Elizabeth Fedorkow (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Pam Koch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Valérie Bolduc (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Aaron Rotenberg (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sheldon Hellin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Scott Misirlis (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Rubinstein (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jiffin Arboleda (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kfir Lavi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tristan Durie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Richard Wu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathleen Mackey (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kaylee Harwood (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from James Carter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Halim Ibrahima (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Beth Baskin (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Maya Watson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jay Fisher (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Mcneill (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Manuel Calleja (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janice Fraser (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Ellen Greenblatt (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Tim Kraan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janet Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Meredith-Karam (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dana Molckovsky (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Murray (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ed Rubinstein (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Arnaud Seigne (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Alison Stewart (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Alex Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Wilson (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ian Worling (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Thenganatt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mary F Kennedy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Neil Arcot (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Monica Henriques (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Kristian Bassi (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Lars Bryan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Elizabeth Chrumka (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Cayla Clarkson (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Kai Davey-Bellin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Julia Ettlinger (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Lee Giles (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Hoyle (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Chris Jacobs (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Charles Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jenny Wawrow (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Robert Kaross (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Abdullah (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mauricio Argote-Cortes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Bozek (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Carmona-Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Shan Duan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Louloua Habli (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Stephan Huettenschmidt (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Niall Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Matthieu Schapira (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Vandendam (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Lynn Walker (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Maria Yancheva (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ingrid Buday (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Patrick N. (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Oliver (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Delfina Ortega-Paredes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Tierney Smith (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Mccluskey (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141688.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Vaisar (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from David Langer (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Mary Ann Neary, Albert Koehl and Janet Joy Wilson, Toronto Community Bikeways Coalition (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141699.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Pippa Johnstone (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Zoraida Anaya (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Soroush Arghavan (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Lauren Blumas (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jagvir Brar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Juanity Da Barros (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mark Fernando (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Hagit Fry (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kris Langille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mike Lawler (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Claus Lensbol (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Muroff (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kendrick Paterson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Holly Reid (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from John Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andreas Wille (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Kathleen Mackey, Francis Jeanson, Mary Ann Neary, on behalf of 32 Spokes (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141783.pdf
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from James Barker (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Clark Whitney (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Douglas Ferguson (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Lidia Labate (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Claire Smith (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Vince Hughes (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Marc Boudreau (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from James O'Malley (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Robbins (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ethan Chiddicks (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Robert Zaichkowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sheila Jacobs (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Martin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Resident of Silverthorn (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from CW (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Valérie Bolduc (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jack Derricourt (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jaime-Leigh Fairbrother (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Maria Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Shawn Wyckoff (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Whitney Kemble (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Tracy Parks (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Sara Blumenstein (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Laurie Gilbert (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from John Leeson (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jackson, Don (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Marc Fowler (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Amy Smith (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Heather Schramm (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Allie Caldwell (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Di Camillo (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from David Ley (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Kathy Laird (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Saba Ahmad (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jeff Craig (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from David Lussier (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Brian McLachlan (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Najia Zewari (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Michael Polanyi (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Wang (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Ashley Culver (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Clara Halpern (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Donna Patterson (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Councillor Shelley Carroll (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141922.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Shanley Brooks (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Mary Alton (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Mohammad Jaberi (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Lee Scott (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Dave Ley (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Derek Eaton (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Chris Gusz (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gabrielle Herman (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gyula Kovacs (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Steven Fistell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Spencer Roth (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Chris, Sharon, and Jim Gusz (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Aaron Binder (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Charlie Farrell (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Richard Nelson, Holly Reid, Najia Zewari, Executive Committee, Cycle Don Valley Midtown (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142001.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Avi D. (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Deborah Nixon (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Janet Senyshyn (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Michelle Reddick (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ria Prakash (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Michael Black (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Patrick McCluskey (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Darnel Harris, Executive Director and Sam S. Starr, President, Our Greenway Conservancy (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142053.pdf
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Joshua Armstrong (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jibril Zarita (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jane Church (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Jacob Dawang (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Quentin Thwaites (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Avet Khachatryan (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Florence Foerster (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Agnes Kramer-Hamstra (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Cecilia Farrol (IE.New)

Communications (City Council)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rob MacLellan (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Agnes Kramer-Hamstra (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Cecilia Farrol (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Shanaaz Sheriff (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Regilyn Malaguit (CC.Main)
(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Bob Carreau (CC.Main)
(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Julian Alvarez-Barkham (CC.Main)
(December 5, 2021) E-mail from Richsrd Gorman (CC.Main)
(December 5, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Erin Campos (CC.Main)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Laura Stein (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Ewa Lipsztajn (CC.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Dorian Douma (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Michael Longfield (CC.Supp)

IE26.10 - Cycling Network Plan - 2021 Cycling Infrastructure Installation - Fourth Quarter Update and the Future of the 2020 ActiveTO Cycling Network Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore, 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 5 - York South - Weston, 6 - York Centre, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York, 22 - Scarborough - Agincourt, 25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
Attention
Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Bills 1004, 1005, 1006, 1007, 1008, and 1009 have been submitted on this Item.

To be considered with Item IE26.9

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council approve the ActiveTO Cycling Network Expansion projects installed in 2020 currently in place as permanent bikeways, and in doing so, authorize the necessary by-law amendments to retain the following locations as permanent installations:

 

a. Bloor Street (cycle track from Avenue Road to Castle Frank Road);

 

b. Dundas Street East (cycle track from Sackville Street to Broadview Avenue);

 

c. University Avenue/Queens Park (cycle track from Adelaide Street West to Bloor Street West);

 

d. Huntingwood Drive (cycle track from Victoria Park Avenue to Brimley Road);

 

e. Danforth Avenue (cycle track from Broadview Avenue to Victoria Park Avenue);

 

f. Bayview Avenue (multi-use trail from Rosedale Valley Road to River Street); and

 

g. Wilmington Avenue (designated bicycle lanes from Finch Avenue West to Sheppard Avenue West).

 

2. City Council authorize the installation of bicycle lanes, or bicycle lane by-law amendments, on the following sections of roadway, as generally described in Attachment 2 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, titled "Designated Bicycle Lanes":

 

a. Brown's Line (from a point 200 metres south of Dover Drive to Lake Shore Boulevard West);

 

b. Palmerston Square (eastern segment from Palmerston Avenue (south leg) to Palmerston Avenue (north leg);

 

c. Finch Avenue West (from a point 150 metres west of Chesswood Drive to Alexdon Road);

 

d. Winona Drive (from a point 8 metres south of Barrie Avenue and St. Clair Avenue West); and

 

e. Tecumseth Street (from King Street West to Tecumseth Place (north leg).

 

3. City Council authorize the installation of cycle tracks, or adjustments to cycle track by-laws on the following sections of roadway, as generally described in Attachment 3 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, titled "Designated Cycle Tracks":

 

a. Runnymede Road (from St. Clair Avenue West to Liverpool Street);

 

b. Ordnance Street (from Strachan Avenue to a point 100 metres east);

 

c. Palmerston Boulevard (from Bloor Street West to College Street);

 

d. Port Union Road (from Lawrence Avenue East to Island Road);

 

e. Tecumseth Street (from Queen Street West to Adelaide Street West);

 

f. Tecumseth Street (from Wellington Street West to Niagara Street); and

 

g. Baby Point Road (from Jane Street to 15 metres to the west).

 

4. City Council authorize the installation or adjustments of contra-flow bicycle lanes, or bicycle lane by-law amendments, on the following sections of roadway, as generally described in Attachment 4 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, titled "Contra-flow Bicycle Lanes":

 

a. Cambridge Avenue (from Danforth Avenue to a point 35 metres north);

 

b. Florence Crescent (from Pritchard Avenue to Eileen Avenue);

 

c. Palmerston Avenue (from Barton Avenue to Palmerston Square);

 

d. Palmerston Avenue (from London Street to Bloor Street West);

 

e. Palmerston Avenue (from Lane 1 S College E Euclid to 42 metres north of Dundas Street);

 

f. Palmerston Avenue (Dundas Street to Queen Street West); and

 

g. Tecumseth Street (Tecumseth Place (north leg) to Tecumseth Place (south leg).

 

5. City Council authorize the installation of a traffic control signal at the intersection of Palmerston Avenue and Dundas Street West.

 

6. Subject to approval of and in conjunction with the installation of traffic control signals at Palmerston Avenue and Dundas Street West identified in Recommendation 5 above, City Council authorize removal of the pedestrian crossover at Palmerston Avenue and Dundas Street West.

 

7. City Council authorize the reduction of the speed limit from 60 kilometres per hour to 50 kilometres per hour on Port Union Road between Island Road and Lawrence Avenue East.

 

8. City Council authorize the reduction of the speed limit from 50 kilometres per hour to 40 kilometres per hour on University Avenue / Queens Park Circle between Bloor Street West and Gerrard Street West.

 

9. City Council authorize the installation a sidewalk on the western segment of Palmerston Square using temporary materials until a permanent sidewalk is constructed in future years.

 

10. City Council authorize the amendments to traffic and parking regulations associated with Recommendations 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 above, as generally described in Attachment 5 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, titled "Amendments to Traffic and Parking Regulations".

 

11. City Council amend traffic and parking regulations required in Chapter 910 and Chapter 950, as generally described in Attachment 7 to the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, to ensure that the by-law amendments for the Davenport Road cycle tracks and The Esplanade-Mill Street cycle tracks previously approved by City Council are enacted in phases aligned with the timing of implementation of the appropriate segments of the respective projects over 2021 - 2023.

 

12. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider converting the Wilson Avenue diamond lane, between Transit Road and Wilson Heights Boulevard, to include cyclists and high-occupancy vehicles.

 

13. City Council request General Manager, Transportation Services to consider accelerating the planning and consultation work for a cycling route between Balmoral Park and Earl Bales Park recommended in the 10-year bike plan and outlined in the Cycling Network Maps, as shown in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 to the Motion from Councillor Pasternak, on the following roads:

 

a. Almore Avenue from Faywood to York Downs Drive;

 

b. York Downs Drive from Almore Avenue to Armour Boulevard; and

 

c. Armour Boulevard from York Downs Drive to Bombay Avenue and to Avenue Road.

 

14. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment committee by the third quarter of 2022 on alternative routes for the Downsview Loop which eliminates the many obstacles facing the current proposal.

 

15. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, as part of the Palmerston / Tecumseth project, to work in consultation with the local Councillors and stakeholders such as the Palmerston Area Residents Association, to host an additional community meeting on the project in advance of installation to communicate and hear feedback on the approved design. 

 

16. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to report back in first quarter 2023 with recommendations on the process and staffing changes required to have complete street designs considered for every major road rehabilitation project, including the necessary annual Key Performance Indicators to monitor progress.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Infrastructure and Environment Committee considered items IE26.9. and IE26.10 together.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Cycling Network Plan and the associated Near Term Implementation Plan (2019-
2021), adopted by City Council in July 2019 seeks to build on the existing network of cycling routes to Connect gaps in the current network, Grow the network into new parts of the city, and Renew existing parts of the network to improve safety.

 

The 2021 Cycling Network Plan Update report, seeking Council endorsement of the 2022 – 2024 Near-Term Implementation Program, is presented for consideration at this Infrastructure and Environment Committee.

To accompany the 2021 Cycling Network Plan Update and 2022-2024 Near-Team Implementation Program, this report contains a summary of the initial group of bikeway projects that are proposed to be installed in 2022 and 2023 for which design and consultation have been completed. This report also includes recommendations on the future of the temporary 2020 ActiveTO Cycling Network Expansion projects.

 

Transportation Services is seeking authority for the following proposed new bikeway implementation projects to be installed in 2022. The projects are included in the Cycling Network Plan.

 

This report seeks Council authority to install 3.8 centreline kilometres of new bikeways on the following streets:

 

- Palmerston Avenue/Boulevard/Square: Dupont Street to Queen Street West (contra-flow bike lanes and cycle tracks, Ward 10 and 11)


- Tecumseth Street: Queen Street to Niagara Street (contra-flow bike lane and cycle tracks, Ward 10)


- Florence Crescent: Eileen Avenue to Pritchard Avenue (contra-flow bike lane, Ward 5)


- Runnymede Road: Liverpool Street to St. Clair Avenue West (cycle track, Ward 5)


- Ordnance Street: Strachan Avenue to 100 m to the east (cycle track, Ward 10)


- Baby Point Road: Jane Street to 15 metres to the west (cycle track, Ward 4)
 

This report also seeks Council authority to amend the necessary designated by-laws to install the 1.9 centreline kilometres of new bikeways in 2022-2023, which were approved through an Environmental Assessment in 2014 on the following street:

 

- Port Union Road: Island Road to Lawrence Avenue East (cycle track and speed limit reduction, Ward 25)
 

The ActiveTO Cycling Network Expansion program dedicated road space on a temporary basis to facilitate cycling for essential trips and physical activity in order to support the city during the COVID-19 pandemic. The program was highlighted in the City of Toronto's Office of Recovery and Rebuild's COVID-19: Impacts and Opportunities Report, which indicated that transportation infrastructure and programs will be critical for Toronto's recovery to build back better.

 

Among the seven temporary ActiveTO Cycling Network Expansion projects installed in 2020 and currently in place, there has been an increase in cycling volumes and an increase in safety with minimal travel time impacts for people driving. Each of these projects were identified as part of the 2019 Cycling Network Plan adopted by Council, and support the City's efforts to deliver on the Vision Zero Road Safety Plan and the TransformTO Climate Action Strategy.

 

As such, Transportation Services recommends making permanent the following seven ActiveTO Cycling Network Expansion projects installed in 2020, improved in 2021, and currently in place:

 

- Bloor Street: Avenue Road to Sherbourne Street (cycle track, Ward 11 and 13);


- Dundas Street East: Sackville Street to Broadview Avenue (cycle track, Ward 13 and 14);


- University Avenue/Queens Park: Adelaide Street West to Bloor Street West (cycle track and speed limit reduction, Ward 10 and 11);


- Huntingwood Drive: Victoria Park Avenue to Brimley Road (cycle track, Ward 22 and 23);


- Danforth Avenue: Broadview Avenue to Dawes Road, along with a 700 metre extension to - Victoria Park Avenue requested by Council in April 2021 (cycle track, Ward 14 and 19);


- Bayview Avenue: Rosedale Valley Road to River Street (multi-use trail, Ward 13);


- Wilmington Avenue: Finch Avenue West to Sheppard Avenue West (bike lanes, Ward 6).
 

By making the above ActiveTO Cycling Network Expansion projects permanent, Transportation Services will have opportunities to improve the temporary infrastructure currently in place by enhancing the public realm, and adding accessibility and road safety features.

 

ActiveTO 2021 Cycling Network Expansion projects including Yonge Street between Bloor Street and Davisville Avenue, and Bayview Avenue between River Street and Front Street will continue to be monitored and evaluated and a report with recommendations on these projects will be brought forward in early 2022.

 

A map of the cycling projects proposed in this report is included as Attachment 1. The changes proposed would improve safety and mobility options by providing improved cycling connections to transit, parks, local schools, businesses, and residences.  Pedestrian improvements such as curb extensions and new sidewalk installations have also been included in the projects, wherever feasible.

 

While there are varying impacts to traffic operations for motor vehicles, these impacts have been reviewed, analyzed and have been determined by Transportation Services to be acceptable in order to improve safety and comfort of all road users.

 

Finally, this report seeks to make minor housekeeping amendments to existing bikeways and their associated traffic and parking by-laws on the following streets:

 

- Brown's Line (bike lane by-laws, Ward 3);


- Cambridge Avenue (contra-flow bike lane by-laws, Ward 14);


- Finch Avenue West (bike lane by-laws, Ward 6);


- Davenport Road (traffic and parking, Ward 11);


- The Esplanade (traffic and parking, Ward 13);


- University Avenue (traffic and parking, Ward 10 and 11);


- Winona Drive (bike lane by-laws and traffic and parking, Ward 9 and 12).

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Cycling Network Plan - 2021 Cycling Infrastructure Installation - Fourth Quarter Update and the Future of the 2020 ActiveTO Cycling Network Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173655.pdf
Attachment 1 - Proposed Cycling Network Installation Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173696.pdf
Attachment 2 - Designated Bicycle Lanes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173677.pdf
Attachment 3 - Designated Cycle Tracks
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173697.pdf
Attachment 4 - Designated Contra-flow Bicycle Lanes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173678.pdf
Attachment 5 - Amendments to Traffic and Parking Regulations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173679.pdf
Attachment 6 - ActiveTO Detailed Corridor Summaries
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173680.pdf
Attachment 7 - Amendments to Traffic and Parking Regulations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173681.pdf
Public Notice - Removal of Permit Parking spaces on Florence Crescent, between Eileen Avenue and Pritchard Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173699.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Attachment 1 to the Motion from Councillor Pasternak
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173984.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Attachment 2 to the Motion from Councillor Pasternak
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173985.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 16, 2021) Attachment to motion 1 by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174499.pdf
(December 16, 2021) Attachment to motion 2 by Councillor Joe Cressy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174519.pdf

Speakers

Ashley Winberg
Rocky Petkov
Sonam Vashisth, Cycle Toronto

Communications (Committee)

(November 25, 2021) E-mail from Ashley Winberg, Elia Associates PC (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-140469.pdf
(November 25, 2021) E-mail from Jim Smith (IE.Main)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Keith Hlady (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Arnaud Seigne (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dana Molckovsky (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Meredith-Karam (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janice Fraser (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Wilson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Anita Wong (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jill Glessing (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Nikhil Gupte (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Caitlin Ella Wind (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Midanik (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Chris Hobson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Cory Freedman (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gilles Marchildon (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jack Alvo (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Leslie Beedell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Angela Bischoff (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jorge Chaves (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Patrick DeRochie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Warren Haas (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Naomi Hazlett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Avrum Jacobson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Mesbur (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Moore (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Robinson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Steve Thoms (IE.Supp)
(November 19, 2021) E-mail from Michael Warren (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Judith Wiechula (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Federle (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from James Barker (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Clark Whitney (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mike Lawler (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Juanita De Barros (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kris Langille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andreas Wille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Soroush Arghavan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Liz Miller (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeff Sauer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Erica Buchanan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marie Clermont (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Penina Coopersmith (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Luke Franceschini (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tim Grant (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessie Gunn (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Albert Koke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Derek Laurendeau (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lumley Murray (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lori Newton (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Meg O'Mahony (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lucy Perri (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kirk Philipps (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tina Faibish (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maren Woweries-Diallo (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Martin Gagne (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from John Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Zoraida Anaya (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tamara Bernstein (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kendrick Paterson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Edik Zwarenstein (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Claus Lensbøl (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Eliza Brandy (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mark Fernando (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gord Doctorow (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Lauren Blumas (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Debbie Green (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Daniel O'Donnell (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jagvir Brar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Holly Reid (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Hagit Fry (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Muroff (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Patrick N. (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ingrid Buday (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mourtaza Alsammak (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Suzanne Aplin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Riccardo Caimano (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Dicker (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rory Hiles (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marie Jagu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Malcom Kennedy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Ann Kerwin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jason Milligan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Heather Pierce (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jarek Piorkowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Christiane Schmidt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Pavlo Sirous (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Stokes (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Oliver (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Delfina Ortega-Paredes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Louloua Habli (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Carmona-Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Niall Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Vandendam (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Bozek (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Julia Armstrong (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Laura Bast (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Randall Boyd (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Taras Gula (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kelly Ng (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Troth (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Ryan Rivera (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ruth Allen (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mark Altmeyer (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ling Chiu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Carmen Jones (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Janet Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Elaine Luu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Liz Rykert (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Senal Serasinghe (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jenny Sin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Meg Southee (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Cathleen Sullivan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Henriette Terness (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ketan Vegda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Georgina Wilcock (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Robert Yu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Rosemary Boissonneau (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jamie Liscombe (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cesar Shiao Mo (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janet Brooks (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Rob Dunder (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Vanessa Gentile (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Anne James (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Lewis (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Pat Martin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ivan Sherry (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Michael Szego (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Nadia Whitney (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timothy Lee (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alf Merson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brendan Hendel-McCarthy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Marc Marchild (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Anderson (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mario Maceda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ian Browne (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Shahnaz Stri-Shaikh (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Julia Chew (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Duane Currie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Peter Ellement (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rebeca Furtado (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Vilma Gianfelice (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Miles Gripton (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Howard Henderson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dafydd Hughes (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gerald Lazare (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Lombardi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Francesco Menghi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from James Rollfe (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Leigh Evan Silcox (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Patricia Slavinski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cameron Tingley (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Graham Lavender (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Shawnda Charron Nardia (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Dianne Saxe (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Spencer Roth (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matt Welke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ria Prakash (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jason Gallina (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Davis (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Philipp Angermeyer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Melissa Avila (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Boaz Axelrad (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Hannes Bretschneider (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Michael Caldwell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthieu Caron (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Cooper (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Costa (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dorian Douma (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from T.J. Goertz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Herberman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Hunter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeremy Knowles (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arturo M. (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Chris Thom (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tania Szablowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maryanne Stone-Jimenez (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeremy Lundy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bailey Chui (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Hasbany (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ruth Silver (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Hugo Cordeau (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dan Horchik (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Knoch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lara Arabian (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timna Ben-Ari (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Jayne (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Benjamin Lan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cliff Mewdell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alexei Miecznikowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maria Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Rae (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Adam Rosenfield (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathleen Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jim Crummey (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Hollett (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Carmen Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Reding (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gary Chow (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Ben Hanff (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Madeleine Sattler (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sam Arnold (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Norwin Anne (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ivana Marzura (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gavin Platt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Adam El-Masri (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Vanessa Faulkner (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Puru Panch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Puru Panch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrea Grochalova (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Gerry (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Meghan Cheng (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Victoria Adilman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Evan Gilbert (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Hobbs (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Fleming (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Peter Donnelly (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Parisa Bahramloueian (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Simon Andrews (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Loudon Young (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from D. David Landart (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sochi Fried (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dr. T. Tyler Luyben (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Elise Hug (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Ord (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Murumets (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Joey Carter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathy Laird (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Ilse Kramer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Schiller (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Rahul Mehta (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Michele Zuuring (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Argles (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Scottie Wildman (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from José Salvador (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mary Kainer (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Sandra McCrossan (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Federle (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Cory Freedman (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Martin Gagne (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jill Glessing (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Nikhil Gupte (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Chris Hobson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gilles Marchildon (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Midanik (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Caitlin Ella Wind (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Anita Wong (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Avrum Jacobson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Todd Aalgaard (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Maisa Ribeiro Barbosa (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Siobhan McLaughlin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tristan Durie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brendan Hendel-McCarthy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arthur Klimiwicz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timothy Lee (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marcello Mancuso (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alf Merson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Ryan Rivera (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Greg Uchiyama (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mark Winter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tom Worrall (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Chris Heron (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bruce Novakowski (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Cynthia Wilkey (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Leo Petrazickis (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ron Cuba (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ginny Côté (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Anderson (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ian Browne (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Severine Cathelin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Steven Fistell (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Lynn Francis, Mark Lecker, etc. (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Claire Hall (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jose La Rose (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mario Maceda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Marc Marchild (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Robert Staples (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Michael Stroud (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Elora Vink (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maciej Karlowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lori Spring (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gerrit Boerman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Stan Nikipierowicz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Neil Bartlett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Beryl Pilkington (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dana Snell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brian B.K.G (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Melvin Mariampillai (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Stewart Pearson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeffrey Levitt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Theresa Cooke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from David Nash (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Isaac Berman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bruce Bennett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Elizabeth Fedorkow (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Pam Koch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Valérie Bolduc (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Aaron Rotenberg (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sheldon Hellin (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Scott Misirlis (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from John Rubinstein (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jiffin Arboleda (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Kfir Lavi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tristan Durie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Richard Wu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathleen Mackey (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kaylee Harwood (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from James Carter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Halim Ibrahima (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Beth Baskin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maya Watson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jay Fisher (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Mcneill (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Thenganatt (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Manuel Calleja (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janice Fraser (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Ellen Greenblatt (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Tim Kraan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janet Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Meredith-Karam (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dana Molckovsky (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Murray (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ed Rubinstein (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Arnaud Seigne (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Alison Stewart (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Alex Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Wilson (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ian Worling (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mary F Kennedy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Neil Arcot (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Monica Henriques (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Kristian Bassi (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Lars Bryan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Elizabeth Chrumka (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Cayla Clarkson (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Kai Davey-Bellin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Julia Ettlinger (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Lee Giles (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Hoyle (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Chris Jacobs (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Charles Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jenny Wawrow (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Robert Kaross (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Abdullah (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mauricio Argote-Cortes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Bozek (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Carmona-Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Shan Duan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Louloua Habli (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Stephan Huettenschmidt (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Niall Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Matthieu Schapira (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Vandedam (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Lynn Walker (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Maria Yancheva (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ingrid Buday (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Patrick N. (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Oliver (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Delfina Oretga-Paredes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Tierney Smith (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Mccluskey (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141689.pdf
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Zoraida Anaya (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Soroush Arghavan (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Lauren Blumas (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jagvir Brar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Juanita Da Barros (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mark Fernando (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Hagit Fry (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kris Langille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mike Lawler (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Claus Lensbol (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Muroff (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kendrick Paterson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Holly Reid (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from John Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andreas Wille (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Kathleen Mackey, Francis Jeanson, Mary Ann Neary, on behalf of 32 Spokes (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141804.pdf
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from James Barker (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Clark Whitney (IE.Supp)
(November 25, 2021) E-mail from Ashley Winberg (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Douglas Ferguson (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Lidia Labate (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Claire Smith (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Vince Hughes (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Marc Boudreau (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from James O'Malley (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Robbins (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arturo MP (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ethan Chiddicks (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Harold Smith (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lorna Mattison (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sheila Jacobs (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Martin (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Valérie Bolduc (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jack Derricourt (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Michael Black (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Marc Fowler (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Heather Schramm (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Di Camillo (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from David Ley (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jeff Craig (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from David Lussier (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Brian McLachlan (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Michael Polanyi (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Wang (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Malcolm Kennedy (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Donna Patterson (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Daria Dubajic (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Peter Rogers (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Mary Alton (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Mohammad Jaberi (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Lee Scott (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Dave Ley (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Derek Eaton (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Chris Gusz (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gabrielle Herman (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gyula Kovacs (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Steven Fistell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Spencer Roth (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Chris, Sharon, and Jim Gusz (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Avi D. (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Deborah Nixon (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Janet Senyshyn (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Richard Nelson, Holly Reid, Najia Zewari, Executive Committee, Cycle Don Valley Midtown (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142028.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Donna Patterson, Toronto Centre Cyclists (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142029.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Michelle Reddick (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ria Prakash (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Patrick McCluskey (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Keagan Gartz, Executive Director of Cycle Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142065.pdf
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Joshua Armstrong (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jane Church (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Jacob Dawang (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Quentin Thwaites (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Avet Khachatryan (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Florence Foerster (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Agnes Kramer-Hamstra (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Cecilia Farrol (IE.New)

Communications (City Council)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rob MacLellan (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Agnes Kramer-Hamstra (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Cecilia Farrol (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Shanaaz Sheriff (CC.Main)
(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Bob Carreau (CC.Main)
(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Julian Alvarez-Barkham (CC.Main)
(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (CC.Main)
(December 4, 2021) E-mail from Susan Hobbs Gallery (CC.Main)
(December 5, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Erin Campos (CC.Main)
(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Edward Gobran (CC.Main)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Laura Stein (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Steve Gaebel (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Barbara Balfour (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Chloe Raincock (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Ewa Lipsztajn (CC.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Dorian Douma (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Michael Longfield (CC.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Elijah Mullin (CC.New)

IE26.11 - Cargo E-Bike Pilot

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1013 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council opt-in to pilot large cargo power-assisted bicycles under O.Reg 141/21 Pilot Project – Cargo Power-Assisted Bicycles as outlined in the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, titled "Cargo E-bike Pilot ".

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 886, Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks, as follows:

 

a. by inserting a new definition of "large cargo power-assisted bicycle" in Section 886-1B in alphabetical order, to read as follows:

 

"LARGE CARGO POWER-ASSISTED BICYCLE - Includes a cargo power-assisted bicycle or tricycle with (i) a continuous rated output power not exceeding 500 watts; and (ii) a width that is greater than 0.9 metres and weighing more than 120 kilograms unladen, but does not include any vehicle or bicycle capable of being propelled or driven solely by any power other than muscular power.";

 

b. by inserting in Section 886-10A the phrase ", a large cargo power-assisted bicycle," after the phrase "other than a bicycle";

 

c. by inserting in Section 886-10C the phrase ", including a large cargo power-assisted bicycle," after the phrase "stop a vehicle";

 

d. by inserting in Section 886-14 the phrase "or a large cargo power-assisted bicycle" after the phrase "in charge of a bicycle" and after the phrase "on a bicycle"; and

 

e. by inserting in Section 886-15A the phrase "or a large cargo power-assisted bicycle" after the phrase "bicycle".

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make application to the Province of Ontario, Ministry of the Attorney General, and/or Regional Senior Justice to revise any established set fines/set fine short form wording or establish any new set fines under the Provincial Offences Act, as necessary, as may be identified by the City Solicitor or the General Manager, Transportation Services, in order to give effect to Parts 1 and 2 above, and that the City Solicitor in consultation with the appropriate City staff, determine the amount of the set fine to be requested.

 

4. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as follows:

 

a. by deleting in Section 950-101B the word "motor" from the definition of "delivery vehicle";

 

b. by deleting from the definition of "vehicle" in Section 950-101B the phrase "with a continuous rated output power not exceeding 500 watts and weighing not more than 120 kilograms unladen" after the phrase "cargo power-assisted bicycle";

 

c. by deleting the word "motor" in Sections 950-200D (1) and (2);

 

d. by (i) deleting the word "or" between "bicycle" and "cargo power-assisted bicycle"; (ii) inserting a comma after the phrase "leave a bicycle";  (iii) deleting the phrase "with a continuous rated output power not exceeding 500 watts and weighing not more than 120 kilograms unladen"; and (iv) inserting the phrase "or other similar vehicle" after the phrase "cargo power-assisted bicycle" in Section 950-201B;

 

e. by deleting from Section 950-201C(1) the phrase "and weighing not more than 120 kilograms unladen" after the phrase "not exceeding 500 watts";

 

f. by deleting from Section 950-201E the phrase "with a continuous rated output power not exceeding 500 watts and weighing not more than 120 kilograms unladen" and inserting the phrase "or other similar vehicle, "after the phrase "cargo power-assisted bicycle"; and

 

g. by inserting a new Section B.1 in Section 950-1200 as follows:

 

"B.1     Unless at the time of the contravention the bicycle, cargo power-assisted bicycle, or other similar vehicle was in the possession of another person without the bicycle, cargo power-assisted bicycle, or other similar vehicle owner's consent, if a bicycle, cargo power-assisted bicycle, or other similar vehicle has been left in contravention of Section 950-201B, the bicycle, cargo power-assisted bicycle, or other similar vehicle owner shall, upon issuance of a penalty notice, be liable to an administrative penalty."

 

5. City Council establish the new offences as set out in Part 4d above and set an associated penalty amount of $150.00 for offences in 950-201B; and amend Schedule A, Table 10: Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, in City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 610, Penalties, Administration of, in numerical order, generally as follows:

 

Addition to Schedule A, Table 10 - Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking:

 

Column 1

Designated Part of Chapter

Column 2

Short Form Wording

Column 3

Penalty Amount

Section 950-201B

Leave (bicycle/cargo power-assisted bicycle/similar vehicle) on highway

$150.00

 

6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make application to the Province of Ontario, Ministry of the Attorney General, and/or Regional Senior Justice to revise any established set fines/set fine short form wording or establish any new set fines under the Provincial Offences Act, as necessary, as may be identified by the City Solicitor or the General Manager, Transportation Services, in order to give effect to Parts 1, 4 and 5, above, and that the City Solicitor in consultation with the appropriate City staff, determine the amount of the set fine to be requested.

 

7. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to negotiate, enter into, and execute a letter of agreement, where possible, with potential participants of the O.Reg 141/21 Pilot Project - Cargo Power-Assisted Bicycles that weigh more than 120 kilograms unladen to secure their respective commitments and obligations to deliver the pilot project generally in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the report (November 18, 2021) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and upon such additional terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to City Council's decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or by-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor or General Manager, Transportation Services, in order to give effect to Parts 1 to 7, inclusive, above.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee:

 

1. Requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report back on developing policies and plans to require new and existing multi-unit residential and apartment buildings, with above and below ground parking garages, to provide parking for electric and non-electric cycles including cargo cycles, to be constructed in line with the updated bicycle parking guidelines, and to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in early 2022.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

Demand for e-commerce deliveries has sharply risen - leading to more emissions and traffic congestion. Cyclelogistics is the use of bicycles to deliver goods which has the potential to reduce operational costs, emissions and congestion, as well as contribute to road safety by replacing vans and trucks. In June 2021, City Council adopted by-laws to partially opt-in to the Province's pilot project by allowing cargo e-bikes, weighing not more than 120 kilograms unladen, on streets, bike lanes and cycle tracks. A report on a pilot project for larger cargo e-bikes weighing over 120 kilograms unladen was requested for the fourth quarter of 2021.

 

This report recommends amending by-laws to further opt-in to a provincial pilot that runs until March 1, 2026. The pilot will allow large cargo e-bikes over 120 kilograms unladen to operate on roads, bike lanes and cycle tracks, and to be able to park like other commercial vehicles, including in designated on-street commercial loading zones and delivery vehicle parking zones. It also recommends authorizing the General Manager, Transportation Services, to develop and implement agreements with large cargo e-bike participants to ensure safety and data collection. The proposed approach largely follows New York City's cargo e-bike pilot which was a successful pilot that is now being made permanent.

 

Since June 2021, City staff have consulted with a diverse range of internal and external stakeholders on large cargo e-bike regulations. Based on consultations and research, there is overall positive feedback on the potential of large cargo e-bike pilot projects in terms of improving operational efficiencies and achieving environmental objectives. City staff expect that the roll-out at the early stages of the pilot will be small scale (example: 20 to 40 cargo e-bikes), similar to other Canadian cities, and will involve about 4 to 5 companies, with each company starting out with only a few cargo e-bikes to test them. Barriers to the uptake of cargo e-bikes include the high cost of cargo e-bikes, and the lack of locations for storage and distribution to support a fleet of them. The pilot project will be monitored and an evaluation report is proposed to be made public annually.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Cargo E-Bike Pilot
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173616.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141690.pdf
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arturo MP (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ry Shissler, submitting a letter from Keagan Gartz, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141893.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Wang (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Darnel Harris, Executive Director, Our Greenway Conservancy (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142055.pdf

IE26.12 - Automated Micro-Utility Devices - Accessibility Feedback

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications have been submitted on this Item.

First Item of business on Friday, December 17th

Bill 1014 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit the use of automated micro-utility devices on sidewalks and cycle tracks, prohibit the parking, storing, or leaving of automated micro-utility devices on highways or sidewalks, and prohibit the stopping of automated micro-utility devices in a cycle track.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 886, Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks, as follows:


 a. to insert in Section 886-1B in alphabetical order a new definition of micro-utility device as follows:

 

"i.  MICRO-UTILITY DEVICE   - Any device that:


1. operates using any kind of power other than solely muscular power;


2. is automated or remotely controlled;


3. transports itself and/or conducts tasks including transporting goods or cargo, but not passengers.";

 

b. to insert a new Section C in Section 886-15 as follows:


"i. despite anything in this chapter to the contrary, no person shall operate or stop a micro-utility device in a cycle track."

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as follows:

 

a. to insert in Section 950-101B in alphabetical order a new definition of micro-utility device as follows:


 "i.  MICRO-UTILITY DEVICE   - Any device that:

 

1. operates using any kind of power other than solely muscular power;


2. is automated or remotely controlled;


3. transports itself and/or conducts tasks including transporting goods or cargo, but not passengers.";

 

b. to insert a new Section 950-203 as follows:

 

"i.  Section 950-203.  Regulation for Micro-Utility Device.


ii. No person shall operate a micro-utility device on a sidewalk.


iii.  No person shall park, store or leave a micro-utility device on a highway or sidewalk."

 

4. City Council establish new offences and establish new associated penalties and amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 610, Penalties, Administration of, as follows:

 

a. addition to Schedule A, Table 4: Chapter 886, Footpaths, Pedestrian Ways, Bicycle Paths, Bicycle Lanes and Cycle Tracks, which is commensurate with the fine amount for Section 886-15B stopping a vehicle other than a bicycle in a cycle track:

 

Column 1

Designated Part of Chapter

Column 2

Short Form Wording

Column 3

Penalty Amount

Section 886-15C

Stop Micro-utility Device in Cycle Track

$150.00

 

 

b. addition to Schedule A, Table 10: Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, which is commensurate with the fine amount for Section 950-400B(1) stopping a vehicle on/over a sidewalk/footpath:

 

Column 1

Designated Part of Chapter

Column 2

Short Form Wording

Column 3

Penalty Amount

Section 950-203B

Park – Micro-utility Device on (Highway/Sidewalk)

$150.00

Section 950-203B

Store – Micro-utility Device on (Highway/Sidewalk)

$150.00

Section 950-203B

Leave – Micro-utility Device on (Highway/Sidewalk)

$150.00

 

5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills to give effect to City Council's decision and City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any necessary clarifications, refinements, minor modifications, technical amendments, or by-law amendments as may be identified by the City Solicitor or General Manager, Transportation Services, in order to give effect to Parts 1 to 3, inclusive, above and the reasonable operation of the prohibitions against micro-utility devices.

Origin

(November 15, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee

Summary

An introduction to automated micro-utility devices will be presented by Ryan Lanyon, Manager, Strategic Policy and Innovation, Transportation Services, including a proposed provincial pilot project to test such devices off-road on sidewalks, paths or trails.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 15, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee on Automated Micro-Utility Devices - Accessibility Feedback
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173546.pdf
(November 15, 2021) Presentation from the Manager, Strategic Policy and Innovation, Transportation Services Division on Automated Micro-Utility Devices
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173547.pdf

Speakers

Shane O'Herlihy

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141691.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 3, 2021) E-mail from George Bell (CC.Main)
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Frank Naccarato, President, Quantum Robotic Systems Inc. (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142497.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Tina Keshav (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Bob Vaez, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, EventMobi (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142499.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Julia Chelaru (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Abid Ladhani (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Alexander Cui (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Jesse Lau (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from David Albert (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Ryan Ehrlich (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Alexander Norman (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Lucia Annunziata (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Arda Erturk (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Frank Naccarato, President, Quantum Robotic Systems Inc. (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142566.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Frank Naccarato (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) Submission from Nikita Drakokhrust, Senior Consultant, Loyalist Public Affairs on behalf of Tiny Mile (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142600.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Hector Catre (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Jan De Silva, President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Region Board of Trade (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142573.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Austin Spademan, ABC Resident Association Board Member (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142609.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Scott Harrington (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Atena Keshavarzian (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Mark Treleaven (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Ben Carroll (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Ian Bennett (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Graham Takata (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Yaron Vorona (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jordy Koski (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Thomas Lillo (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Adam Day (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Chelo Duenas (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Christine Simone, Co-Founder, Caribou (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142711.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Prem Kalevar (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Sasha Main (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Justin Godard (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Rose Naccarato (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Grace Du (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Martyna (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Ron Van Holst (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Raymond Lee (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Vishu RK (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Adam Weinstein (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Thomas Lillo (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Kate Crabb (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Alex Alksne (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Ian Markauskas (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Claire Dunn (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Catharine Doncaster (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Linas Surplys (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Luisa San Martin (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Solina Bradshaw (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Fred Wu (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Ali Noormahamud (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Dmitry Shevelenko, Co-Founder, Tortoise (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142819.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Bill Schultz (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jake Crow (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Manit Ginoya (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Chelsey Colbert (CC.New)
(December 10, 2021) Letter from Leonard Baker, President and Chief Executive Officer, March of Dimes Canada (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142828.pdf
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Suleman (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Professor Alex Mihailidis, Scientific Director, AGE-WELL NCE Inc. and Hallie Siegel, Assoc. Director, Strategy, University of Toronto Robotics Institute (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142833.pdf
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Oshoma Momoh (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Terry Ng (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Adam Weinstein (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) Petition from Ignacio Tartavull, Chief Executive Officer, Tiny Mile (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142887.pdf
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Frank Naccarato, President, Quantum Robotic Systems Inc. (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142889.pdf
(December 16, 2021) Letter from Brandon Orr, The Municipal Infrastructure Group (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142890.pdf
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Felipe Torres Vanin (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Taylor Duwyn (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Leanne Burkholder (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Sara Urbanowicz (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Raymond Lee (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Ricardo Antonio Rambal Fattori (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Maria Tassou (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Kelly Faria (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Motaz Al-Ashhab (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Hamza Khan (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Micha Laforest (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Cody Deas (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Steve (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Roozbeh Roostaei (CC.New)
(December 17, 2021) E-mail from Eyad Abdalla (CC.New)
(December 17, 2021) E-mail from Sepandar Sepehr (CC.New)
(December 17, 2021) E-mail from Yasear Saad (CC.New)
(December 17, 2021) E-mail from Ali Jahani (CC.New)
(December 17, 2021) E-mail from Liam Smolenaars (CC.New)
(December 17, 2021) E-mail from George Kralidis (CC.New)

12a - Automated Micro-Utility Device Oversight and Regulations

Origin
(November 15, 2021) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Chair, Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee
Summary

On September 29, 2021, the Ministry of Transportation posted a proposal on automated micro-utility devices soliciting feedback by November 15, 2021, on a regulatory framework for a provincial pilot project under the Highway Traffic Act. This pilot would allow remote-controlled micro-utility devices, including automated personal delivery devices, for use primarily off-road in places such as sidewalks in Ontario municipalities. This proposal broadly covers devices that will not be defined as a motor vehicle in Ontario, are task-oriented, and operated to primarily provide services such as the delivery of goods and not passengers, and for operation primarily off-road on sidewalks. In addition, Ministry of Transportation has proposed the following for the device/vehicle:

 

- No height limit, a 125 kilogram maximum weight, and a 74 centimetre maximum width for all micro-utility devices, except automated snow plows which have no proposed weight and dimension restrictions;


- A 10 kilometre per hour maximum speed on sidewalks and a 20 kilometre per hour maximum speed on shoulders of roads or bike lanes;


- A municipal opt-in and collision reporting regime, with authority to set by-laws and limit operations;


- Mandatory operator oversight, capable of creating a safe stop;


- Mandatory audible signals to alert those nearby;


- A requirement for reflectors and lights, with lights to be lit if operated between sunset and sunrise;


- A requirement for micro-utility devices to be equipped with brakes;


- Prohibiting the carrying of controlled substances and dangerous goods that require a federal placard;


- General liability insurance, good working order, and secured loads requirements;
- A requirement to yield to pedestrians (no details on how);


- requirement for an operator name, contact, and unique device number to be displayed on the exterior of the micro-utility devices.

 

Transportation staff are reviewing this issue and have submitted comments to the Province after receiving feedback from the Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee at its meeting on November 15, 2021. Members of Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee , as well as deputants, shared their lived experiences and pressed that it is our responsibility as a municipality under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act that we work to remove barriers faced by people living with disabilities. This pilot would be yet another dangerous hazard in the public realm for anyone with low mobility, low vision, or using a mobility device as well as children and senior residents.  Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee unanimously adopted a motion recommending that City Council prohibit the use of, and parking, storing or leaving of micro-utility devices on sidewalks and cycle tracks. Such devices are already prohibited on footpaths, pedestrian ways, and bike lanes, and similar clarity is required for sidewalks and cycle tracks.

 

It is critical that the City of Toronto develop the necessary policies and clarity to ensure the prohibition and enforcement of automated micro-utility devices, reinforcing the City’s commitment to accessibility and Vision Zero Road Safety.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 15, 2021) Letter from Councillor Kristyn-Wong-Tam, Chair, Toronto Accessibility Advisory Committee on Automated Micro-Utility Device Oversight and Regulations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173441.pdf

IE26.14 - Missing Link Sidewalk Program - Dwight Avenue Sidewalk Installation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Third Item of business on Friday, December 17th, to be considered with Item IE26.6

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to continue with the planned construction of a new sidewalk on the west side of Dwight Avenue from Birmingham Street to Maple Boulevard.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

Provision of safe, comfortable and accessible sidewalks on all public streets is a fundamental objective of the Vision Zero 2.0 Road Safety Plan. Sidewalks support safety, accessibility, affordable transportation, physical activity, safe routes to school, aging in place and sustainable growth. Through the Missing Links Sidewalk Installation Program, Transportation Services reviews opportunities to install sidewalks on all roadway classifications through bundling with other state-of-good-repair work, as well as stand-alone delivery.

 

Dwight Avenue is classified as a collector road. City policy calls for sidewalks on both sides of collector roads. In 2016, Transportation Services received a request from the Toronto District School Board to install a sidewalk on the west side of Dwight Avenue adjacent to Second Street Jr. Middle School.

 

A sidewalk on the west side of Dwight Avenue adjacent to the school was programmed for construction in 2021 based on opportunity for the work to bundled with adjacent state-of-good-repair work on Birmingham Street, Murrie Street, and Herman Street.  While options to minimize impact on trees were considered as part of the design process, a total of 12 trees need to be removed to construct the sidewalk.

 

In October 2021, City Council directed the General Manager, Transportation Services to halt this project and report back to the December 2, 2021 Infrastructure and Environment Committee meeting on the feasibility of narrowing Dwight Avenue to accommodate the proposed new sidewalk and save the existing trees. This report provides information in response to that request.

 

This sidewalk provides an essential missing link in the sidewalk network and is adjacent to a school. Transportation Services recommends proceeding with the sidewalk installation and tree removal based on the current design and enhanced replanting plan that is proposed which includes 17 trees to be replanted in this location to continue growing Toronto’s tree canopy.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Missing Link Sidewalk Program - Dwight Avenue Sidewalk Installation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173527.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Melinda Frank (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Martin Ritchie (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Kasia Kogut (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Robyn Parashyniak (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Holly Boyne (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ann Botelho (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Roberto Botelho, Professor, Department of Chemistry and Biology, Ryerson University (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141763.pdf
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Da Silva (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from W.R Thuma (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arturo MP (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Anne-Marie Klein (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Kristina Boon (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Stasia Hrynyk (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Stephen Ford (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jodi Moran (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) Letter from Meredith Heinrich (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) Letter from Alexander Satel (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) Letter from Jack Gibbons (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Vanessa Keall-Vejar (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rita Di Cesare, Oleksa Slywynsky, and Luuk Slywynsky (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Melodie Barnett (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Caroline Van Haeften (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Vasundhara Sharma (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Kate Morawetz (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Charlotte Sheasby-Coleman (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Woodward (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Chloe Macrae (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Smith (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Natasha Mistry (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Bonnie O'Brien (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Melodie Barnett (IE.Supp)

Communications (City Council)

(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Daina Koly (CC.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Silva (CC.Main)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Rita Di Cesare, Oleksa Slywynsky and Luuk Slywynsky (CC.Main)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Donald Elrick (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Sheila Carmichael (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Jason Hewitt (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Joanne Yano (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Meredith Heinrich (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Melodie Barnett (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Candice Smith (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Chloe Macrae (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Tanya Cross (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Ron, Ann Marie and Chumly (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Scott (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Oleksa Slywynskyj (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Elizabeth Harte (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Mallette (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Peggy Irwin (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Andrea Poorter (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Christina Murie (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Donna Struk (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Kristina Boon (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Alison Gadsby (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Justin Godard (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) Submission from Jodi Moran, including a petition signed by 1161 people (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Pamela Gough (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Rena Sherring (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Judy Gibson, Vice Chair, Long Branch Neighbourhood Association, and Chair, Tree Canopy Preservation and Enhancement Committee (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142755.pdf
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Jackie Goodman (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Bradley Jones (CC.New)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Donna Sellers (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Jodi Moran (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142787.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Natasha Mistry (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Starr Smith, Chair, and Patricia Austin, Co-Chair, META (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142789.pdf
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Martin Ritchie (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Alexander Satel (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Jasmine Baird-Denham (CC.New)
(December 16, 2021) E-mail from Judith Rutledge (CC.New)
(December 17, 2021) E-mail from Eric Code (CC.New)

IE26.15 - Update on Pedestrian Scale Street Lighting

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake an assessment of the general condition of existing pedestrian scale lighting assets and to include funding for staff oversight and third party consulting costs of $1.0 Million within the 2022 Operating Budget submission for Transportation Services.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to negotiate the necessary amendments to the existing Street and Expressway Lighting Agreement with Toronto Hydro to include lighting styles, any required lighting asset standards, and any related funding impacts.

 

3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back on the comprehensive state-of-good-repair plan for existing pedestrian scale lighting and ten year plan for new pedestrian scale lighting as part of the 2023 Budget process.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Infrastructure and Environment Committee with information as requested, pertaining to the City's existing street lighting service agreement with Toronto Hydro Corporation, addressing street lighting standards, accessibility and safety specifically in the context of pedestrian scale lighting.

 

This report provides a strategy to address the concerns raised for adding and replacing pedestrian-scale lighting where the sidewalks are dark at night and require additional lighting and for adding new lighting standards.

 

It is anticipated that any changes proposed may require amendments to the existing Street and Expressway Lighting Agreement with Toronto Hydro.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Update on Pedestrian Scale Street Lighting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173621.pdf

Speakers

Tony Farebrother, Toronto Island Community Association
Jamie Smith , Toronto Island Community Association

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tony Farebrother (IE.Supp)

IE26.16 - TransformTO - Critical Steps for Net Zero by 2040

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Interim Director, Environment and Energy has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (IE26.16a with recommendations).

Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Mayor's first Key Matter and first Item of business on Wednesday, December 15th


This item will be considered with EX28.1 - Toronto Hydro Climate Action Plan and Next Steps

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council endorse the targets and actions outlined in Attachment B to the report (December 2, 2021) from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy, titled "TransformTO Net Zero Strategy".

 

2. City Council approve the following community-wide greenhouse gas reduction targets:

 

a. 45 percent reduction in community-wide greenhouse gas emissions by 2025, from 1990 levels; and

 

b. net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040.

 

3. City Council direct the Director, Environment and Energy to report back:

 

a. in the second quarter of 2025, with a status update on progress in meeting the City of Toronto's 2030 corporate and community-wide greenhouse gas reduction targets, as outlined in Recommendation 2 above and Attachment B to the report (December 2, 2021) from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy, titled "TransformTO Net Zero Strategy";

 

b. in the second quarter of 2025, with a four year implementation plan for 2026-2030 on any additional actions and authorities required to achieve the City of Toronto's 2030 greenhouse gas reduction target; and

 

c. annually on emission reductions achieved for community-wide greenhouse gas reduction targets, and the 2025, and 2030 goal.

 

4. City Council direct the City Manager, in consultation with all appropriate City divisions heads, including the City Solicitor, or their designates, to develop and implement a plan that outlines how to refer to TransformTO Net Zero Strategy goals and targets as and where appropriate in all relevant:

 

a. submissions that the City of Toronto makes or the City of Toronto staff make in federal and provincial public comment processes; and

 

b. filings that the City of Toronto makes in proceedings before Federal and Provincial regulatory bodies, administrative tribunals and courts.

 

5. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, or their designate, until December 31, 2030, to negotiate and enter into agreements, as may be required, to support the implementation of the City Council-adopted recommendations presented in the TransformTO Net Zero Strategy, dated December 2, 2021 with non-profit, public, and private sector organizations to: 

 

a. collaborate on projects or initiatives;

 

b. provide in-kind and / or financial support from the approved Environment and Energy Division budget on projects or initiatives; and/or

 

c. receive funding,

 

on terms and conditions acceptable to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, in consultation with the Director, Environment and Energy, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

6. City Council authorize the Deputy City Managers to negotiate and enter into non-competitive agreements, including those with a value exceeding $500,000 for which City Council approval would normally be required under City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Purchasing) with companies that have won Climate Champion status through the MaRS Discovery District's Mission from MaRS Climate Impact Challenge, on the following conditions:

 

a. that the provision of goods or services from the company will assist the City to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and is aligned with the City's Net Zero Strategy;

 

b. that any agreement is within the budget of the respective division within the Deputy City Manager's Service Area;

 

c.  that the agreement is on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager; and

 

d.  that the agreement is in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

7. City Council direct that the Chief Procurement Officer report, as part of the annual Controller's report, on any non-competitive agreement that the Deputy City Managers enter into with companies that have won Climate Champion status through the MaRS Discovery District's Mission from MaRS Climate Impact Challenge.

 

8. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with the City Clerk, to submit a Bill to Council to codify the currently Council-adopted targets, strategies, policies, programs and initiatives pertaining to green energy and climate change, in the first instance from this report, as additional articles in Chapter 669 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, as and where appropriate.

 

9. City Council direct the City Manager and Deputy City Managers, in consultation with the Director, Environment and Energy to report back by the first quarter of 2023 on:

 

a. what aspects of existing City programs and / or by-laws aimed at reducing natural gas use in new and existing buildings need to be strengthened or accelerated; and

 

b. what additional programs and / or by-laws aimed at reducing natural gas use in new and existing buildings need to be developed and implemented,

 

in order to achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets as outlined in Recommendation 2 above and Attachment B to the report (December 2, 2021) from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy, titled "TransformTO Net Zero Strategy".

 

10. City Council direct the Director, Environment and Energy, in consultation with the Controller, the Director, Accounting Services, the General Manager, Transportation Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and other appropriate City Divisions, to prepare financial options and other incentives that the City could provide to encourage uptake of personal electric vehicles and disincentives to discourage use of fossil-fueled personal vehicles within the City of Toronto boundaries and report back through the 2023 budget where feasible and subsequent budget years if implementation in the 2023 budget is not feasible.

 

11. City Council direct the Director, Environment and Energy in consultation with the Controller, the Director, Accounting Services, the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning, the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Buildings, and other appropriate City Divisions, and with Toronto Hydro, and to report back in the first quarter of 2023 on options for additional financial incentives, disincentives and other mechanisms to further encourage deep retrofits of existing buildings.

 

12. City Council direct the Director, Environment and Energy and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to report back in the fourth quarter of 2022 on design and implementation options for a Toronto Carbon Budget and associated key performance metrics, which align with the City's financial budgets, to manage corporate and community greenhouse gas emissions, within an absolute limit that aligns with the City’s 2025, 2030, and 2040 emissions reduction targets, and make clear the implications of the limits for the City's financial budgets, the 2024 budget cycle.

 

13. City Council request the Government of Ontario and Provincial agencies and corporations to:

 

a. develop and implement new or amend existing legislation, regulations, policies and / or programs in order to prioritize:

 

1. demand response and conservation as sources of electricity generation in Independent Electricity System Operator generation selection; and

 

2. increase the share of renewable electricity generated on the provincial electricity grid;

 

b. implement legislation, regulations, policies/or programs to encourage the transition to electric vehicles, including:

 

1. financial incentives for new and used Electric Vehicles;

 

2. financial incentives for home, workplace and fleet Electric Vehicles charging infrastructure;

 

3. establish a provincial sales mandate for Zero Emission Vehicles ("Zero Emission Vehicles" are battery-electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles or hydrogen fuel cell vehicles) that meets or exceeds any federal sales mandate for Zero Emission Vehicles:

 

4. support and encourage Electric Vehicles-ready new construction;

 

5. funding for publicly-accessible Electric Vehicle charging infrastructure, including for bi-directional chargers;

 

6. maintain existing benefits for Electric Vehicle drivers (e.g. High Occupancy Vehicle lane access on provincial highways); and

 

7. add financial incentives for purchasing all bikes, e-bikes and other non-carbon vehicles that are approved for use on City of Toronto road ways and cycling infrastructure; and

 

c. require all new and replacement equipment for building heating systems to be greater than 100 per cent efficiency.

 

14. City Council request the Government of Canada and Federal agencies and corporations to:

 

a. create and enforce a national clean electricity standard to ensure decarbonization of the electricity grid as soon as possible;

 

b. ensure all new and replacement equipment for building heating systems be greater than 100 percent efficient as soon as possible;

 

c. implement new and maintain existing financial incentives to encourage the transition to electric vehicles, including:

 

1. maintain purchase incentives for new electric vehicles and providing purchase incentives for used electric vehicles;

 

2. provide financial incentives for home, workplace and fleet electric vehicle charging infrastructure; and

 

3. provide funding to provinces and municipalities for public electric vehicle charging infrastructure, including for bi-directional chargers;

 

d. create and fund a national workforce and skills development strategy to enable a just net-zero transition;

 

e. conduct a strategic review of international and national supply chain requirements and issues to ensure that municipalities have sufficient access to all goods and services necessary to enable a transition to the net zero emission economy;

 

f. provide mechanisms and tools to lower the risk to lenders or similar entities involved with financing projects that enable decarbonization at scale; and

 

g. explore the creation of new crown corporations to manufacture and / or bulk purchase heat pumps, net zero hot water heaters, solar panels, renewable energy technologies, and electric vehicles.

 

15. City Council direct the Director, Environment and Energy, in coordination with Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Chief Procurement Officer, Purchasing and Materials Management, to identify ways that the City can support the reduction of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with food the City of Toronto procures, in alignment with the City's Cool Food Pledge and the C40 Good Food Cities Declaration, and to report back in the second quarter of 2023 on the status of corporate food-related emissions and recommended actions for the TransformTO 2026-2030 short-term action plan, including a goal to maximize local, organic and fair trade food procurement.

 

16. City Council direct the City Manager to explore the establishment of municipally owned corporations (modeled after the successful district energy system Enwave) for the purpose of manufacturing, installing, bulk purchasing, distributing and installing heat pumps, hot water heaters, renewable energy technologies, district energy systems, and electric vehicles.

 

17. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to ensure the Official Plan, Zoning Bylaws, and planning policies and various Planning guidelines support the recommendations in the Net Zero Strategy, including to discourage vehicle trips, enhance building energy efficiency, to reduce embedded carbon during construction, and to encourage active transportation and transit for short trips.

 

18. City Council express its support for a ban on two-stroke engine leaf blowers, lawnmowers and other small engine equipment and vehicles and request the Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards report back on the implementation of a ban as part of the noise update report in 2022.

 

19. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to report back in first quarter 2023 with recommendations on the process and staffing changes required to have complete street designs considered for every major road rehabilitation project, including the necessary annual Key Performance Indicators to monitor progress.

 

20. City Council use its considerable influence as an OMERS employer sponsor and seat on the OMERS’ Administration Corporation, to request that OMERS considers the City of Toronto’s Net Zero strategy in its investment decisions and climate commitments, with a goal of limiting the global average temperature increase to 1.5˚ Celsius, including a plan to phase out investments in coal, oil, gas and pipelines, and consider alternatives putting a screen on new fossil fuel investments.

 

21. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Building Official to report back in 2022 on the feasibility of implementing emissions performance standards or incentives for existing buildings using the City’s existing authorities, for implementation in 2023 or specific recommendations for any regulatory or legislative changes needed to enable implementation of emissions performance standards and on use of the permit process to ensure or encourage existing building HVAC and hot water replacement with 100 percent efficient equipment by 2028 and all additions and renovations to meet higher energy efficiency standards.

 

22. City Council request the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing to consider strengthening the requirements in the Ontario Building Code for increased energy efficiency improvements at the time of renovation.


23. City Council request the Director, Environment and Energy to develop a plan to provide financing support for low carbon thermal energy systems, potentially including the use of Local Improvement Charges or other financial mechanisms, as well as mandatory connections or connection ready and low temperature HVAC design guidelines and standards for new buildings and report back in 2023 with implementation in 2024.

 

24. City Council request the Interim Director, Environment and Energy to provide a clear definition of low carbon thermal energy sources in order to enable monitoring of progress against the target at their next annual report on the status of TransformTO.

 

25. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to set a goal of Net Zero for 2030 for vehicles-for-hire, and to align the plans for vehicle electrification and emissions reduction to achieve this goal.

 

26. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning, report back on a requirement for all gas stations to provide mandatory Electric Vehicle charging.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee:

 

1. Referred the following motions to the Director, Environment and Energy, for review in collaboration with relevant divisions and interested City Councillors, and report directly to City Council at its meeting on December 15 and 16, 2021:

 

1. City Council endorse the targets and actions outlined in Attachment B, titled "TransformTO Net Zero Strategy" to the report (December 2, 2021) from the Director, Environment and Energy with the following additional instructions:

 

a. request City Planning advance the schedule for implementing versions five and six of the Toronto Green Standard by one year each, such that V5 applies in 2025 and V6 applies in 2028 and explore stronger incentives for the current tier 2 and tier 3;


b. request City Planning, as part of the review of embedded carbon in buildings, implement policies to encourage use of low-carbon intensive materials to build buildings;


c. request the Director, Environment and Energy and Chief Planner work with other divisions as needed to require all new buildings to be connected to district renewable thermal energy systems or to be connection ready;


d. request the Director, Environment and Energy to set goals of no new expansion of energy systems which produce carbon and report back in 2023 with actions to be implemented to support this endeavour;


e. request the General Manager, Transportation Services accelerate the capital budget schedule for redesign of roadways as part of the bike plan;


f. request the Toronto Transit Commission to accelerate their green fleet plan and to ensure all new bus purchases are low carbon in 2022 instead of 2025;


g. support resident-led climate action and engagement by dedicating an action area to supporting community hubs, community centres, neighbourhood pods and other local support networks, as key social and physical infrastructure for strengthening community climate engagement and resilience;


h. establish a Climate Advisory Group that centres the voices of equity-deserving groups, and includes youth, civil society organizations, labour and workers' rights organizations, and academia, and will:


1. work with Indigenous rights holders and urban Indigenous communities to share knowledge and learnings to inform climate action; and


2. resource the Climate Advisory Group to meet regularly and publish an annual independent accountability report to review the City’s progress on the TransformTO Net Zero Strategy, possibly with support from the Auditor General or other resources;


i. ensure an independent peer review of the climate lens to ensure the criteria is agreed upon through the engagement of climate advocacy groups, experts and academics - to ensure robust criteria are used in the development/application of the climate lens;


j. ensure the risk of reserves and other investments follow the strictest protocols for Environmental, Social & Governance investing and climate risk;


k. ensure TCHC buildings are included in Corporate Real Estate Management’s Net Zero carbon plan; and


l. ensure that, as of 2023, any new equipment being installed in a city facility must contribute to net zero and all new buildings be designed and built to net zero.

 

2. That the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services report on the feasibility of creating a Climate Change Corps to support the goals and objectives of the Transform TO Net Zero Strategy. Staff should engage organizations like the Carpenters Union local 27 and the Community Benefits Network in helping to create the Climate Change Corps.

 

Infrastructure and Environment Committee considered items IE26.16 and IE26.18 together.

Origin

(November 19, 2021) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services

Summary

The climate crisis grows more urgent every year. The window to make significant and lasting change is disappearing.  Action must happen immediately and it must be at the necessary scale required to respond to this crisis.     

 

In 2017, TransformTO was unanimously approved by City Council demonstrating Toronto’s commitment to a global call for action to limit global temperature rise in line with international goals. Since 2017, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has shown that to limit global temperature rise to below 1.5 degrees Celsius, cities globally need to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050 and halve global emissions by 2030.

 

City Council’s 2019 declaration of a global climate emergency shifts Toronto’s focus to align with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's recommended pathway - net zero by 2050 or sooner.

 

This Report recommends that Toronto adopt a new net zero by 2040 goal.  By doing so, Toronto will ensure alignment with the 2030 trajectory to meet the necessary scientific-based commitments to keep the planet's temperature habitable.

 

Technical modelling of Toronto's net zero pathway shows us that in order to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 or sooner, Toronto must first be on the correct trajectory for achieving its 2030 City Council adopted goal of 65 per cent emissions reduction from 1990 levels. Without aligning our action and implementation to that steeper trajectory, net zero by 2040 or 2050 will be out of reach.

 

The City is taking action to tackle Toronto's emissions through established programs and major policy achievement such as the Net Zero Existing Building Strategy, Net Zero Carbon Plan for City-owned buildings, an update to the Toronto Green Standard, the Electric Vehicle Strategy, advancing the City's Cycling Plan, and greening City and Toronto Transit Commission fleets. Steady progress has been made to reduce emissions in recent years and community-wide greenhouse gas emissions have decreased since 1990. Toronto is on track to achieve its 2020 greenhouse gas emissions target of a 30 per cent reduction from 1990 levels.  Despite population growth, community-wide emissions continue to decline while Toronto's gross domestic product rises. The decrease in greenhouse gas emissions in recent years can be attributed to a less carbon intensive electricity grid and lower transportation emissions from gasoline and diesel fuels. 

 

Toronto's current 2019 greenhouse gas inventory shows that our emissions are currently tracking on the trajectory of an 80 per cent reduction by 2050, from 1990 levels, however, emissions have not decreased fast enough in recent years.  Data shows that acting incrementally will not be enough to put us on the net zero trajectory. Rapid action to scale up existing programs, additional authorities for the City of Toronto (City) to implement nimbly and effectively, significant levels of investment and coordinated action with other levels of government will be needed to match City Council's ambition.

 

TransformTO Net Zero Framework:

 

The TransformTO: Critical Steps for Net Zero by 2040 Report approach is presented in the following parts:

 

- This staff report outlines the rationale, roles and opportunities needed for successful delivery on climate action, and presents an overview of the actions the City will take to reach the 2030 interim targets;


- Attachment A is the TransformTO Net Zero Strategy Short-Term Implementation Plan 2022 to 2025;


- Attachment B is the TransformTO Net Zero Strategy, which includes the rationale behind the net zero pathway and opportunities needed to successfully reach the net zero target;


- Attachment C is the TransformTO Net Zero Framework Technical Report, which provides details on the pathway and specific actions that can be taken by the City, other governments, residents, and businesses;


- Attachment D provides highlights of Toronto's programs that are reducing emissions;


- Attachment E provides a summary of public and stakeholder consultations from 2018 to 2021 that have supported the development of this strategy and actions; and


- Attachment F responds to a City Council request on the impact of small engine law and garden equipment.
 

Achieving net zero is not simply a technology solution. The combination of attentive urban design, city planning, active transportation, and transit systems, changes in consumptive behaviour and supportive net zero consumer choices, will all need to work in step to cumulatively increase the efficiencies of corresponding urban systems.

 

No municipal government has the legislative tools or fiscal capacity to achieve ambitious targets on its own. Reaching net zero by 2040 will require additional authority or action from other levels of government, the private sector, and resident action. For example, the City of Toronto does not regulate electric vehicle sales targets, but the City can enable uptake through providing charging infrastructure. Similarly, implementation of the Existing Buildings Strategy to retrofit homes and buildings will require additional legal authority to set performance standards from the provincial government.

 

The Net Zero Strategy presents a set of 2030 interim targets for community-wide emissions as well as City of Toronto corporate targets to demonstrate leadership by example. These targets are designed to reduce emissions by 6.8Mt in the next eight years. This is equivalent to about 2 million cars off the road.  The 2030 targets presented in the Strategy are:

 

1. 100 per cent of new buildings are designed and built to be near zero greenhouse gas emissions;

 

2. 50 per cent reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from existing buildings, from 2008 levels; this means that approximately 100,000 buildings must be retrofitted in the next 8 years, or approximately 12,500 buildings per year;

 

3. 50 per cent of community-wide energy comes from renewable or low-carbon sources; this will mean that approximately 35 million megawatt hour of energy will need to be sourced from renewable or low carbon sources;


4. 25 per cent of commercial and industrial floor area is connected to low carbon thermal energy sources;


5. 75 per cent of school/work trips under 5kilometres are walked, biked or by transit;


6. 30 per cent of registered vehicles in Toronto will be electric; this means that by 2030, an estimated 332,000 vehicles will need to be electric;

 

7. Identify pathways to more sustainable consumption in City of Toronto operations and in Toronto's economy;


8. 70 per cent residential waste diversion from the City of Toronto’s Integrated Waste Management System; and


9. Reduce corporate emissions by 65 per cent, over 2008 levels, to demonstrate leading by example; this will mean that approximately 330 kiloton of emissions will need to be reduced cross-corporately.

 

Achieving these 2030 targets requires action now. A summary of thirty (30) near-term actions to be implemented between 2022 and 2025 are listed below. More detailed descriptions of each action including their timeline for report back is included in the TransformTO Short-Term Implementation Plan 2022-2025 (Attachment A) and in the Net Zero Strategy (Attachment B).

 

Meeting Targets:

 

Achieving the targets in the Net Zero Strategy will not just be the work of the City government. The City of Toronto Corporation can control only a small portion of Toronto's community-wide emissions directly -- nearly 5 per cent according to recent greenhouse gas inventories.

 

However, the City plays a clear role in defining the ways we build, travel, and consume and when policies are effectively implemented and programs are easily accessed to realize maximum uptake and engagement, our municipal government can have a greater impact on the community's emissions. 

 

In order to meet the 2030 targets, the City will use its influence to regulate, advocate and facilitate rapid transformation in five critical steps:

 

- Demonstrate carbon accountability locally and globally by establishing a carbon budget – Leading by example, the City will establish a carbon budget to track climate actions against annual emission limits to drive accountability. The City's actions will be measured against these limits each year until net zero is achieved, with any gaps in action identified and solutions proposed so we stay on course.

 
- Accelerate a rapid and significant reduction in natural gas use – Toronto will take further action to limit the use of natural gas.  Natural gas use for water and space heating represents over half of Toronto’s total greenhouse gas emissions. In addition to new buildings eliminating natural gas use through the Toronto Green Standard, the Net Zero Existing Buildings Strategy articulates ambitious targets to replace conventional heating systems with more efficient electric heat pumps drawing from a green provincial electricity grid.

 
- Establish performance targets for existing buildings – Toronto will establish mandatory emissions performance reporting, disclosure, and emissions performance targets for buildings so we can better understand and limit emissions from our homes and buildings. These mandatory targets will be preceded by voluntary targets. Catalyzing the electrification of building heating systems, as a preferred alternative to the use of fossil-fuel heating systems, will be key.

 
- Increase access to low carbon transportation options, including walking, biking, public transit and electric vehicles – Toronto will increase the use of active and public transportation reduces greenhouse gas emissions, energy use and congestion while promoting equity and health benefits. The City will also advance options to incentivize electric vehicle adoption and disincentivize the use of carbon-polluting gasoline and diesel vehicles, through supporting the transition to electric vehicles.
 

- Increase local renewable energy to contribute to a resilient, carbon-free grid – Toronto will work in step with Toronto Hydro to successfully support the growth and prosperity of the city through reliable, uninterrupted electric service provision.  By increasing opportunities for local renewable generation to be located within the City's boundary, Toronto will be more resilient and will contribute to a decarbonized provincial electricity grid.

 

Although these five steps will put the community on the correct path to 2030, it is critical that these steps be sustained through to the year 2040 in order to achieve net zero emissions by 2040.  Technical modelling suggests that if every single resident, business, non-commercial institution, industry and the City of Toronto government itself was enabled to choose net zero choices now, 2040 is achievable.

 

Summary of Short Term Implementation Plan Actions (2022-2025)

 

100 per cent of new buildings are designed and built to be near zero greenhouse gas emissions, by 2030

1

Ensure near zero emissions for all new construction

2

Evaluate and limit impacts of embodied carbon in construction

Greenhouse gas emissions from existing buildings are cut in half, from 2008 levels, by 2030

3

Advance Implementation of the Net Zero Existing Buildings Strategy

50 per cent of community-wide energy comes from renewable or low-carbon sources and 25 per cent of commercial and industrial floor area is connected to low carbon thermal energy sources, by 2030

4

Work with industry experts to explore limiting the expansion of natural gas systems and reversing system growth, where feasible, and limiting installation of natural gas equipment

5

Support adoption and mainstreaming of net zero, resilient energy sources for new and existing developments

6

Address barriers and develop strategies to increase the deployment of renewable energy and storage technologies, including but not limited to solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, waste heat recovery and heat pumps

7

Actively support, advocate to and partner with Toronto Hydro, as well as the Provincial and Federal governments and agencies, to decarbonize the provincial electricity grid, promote energy conservation and enable local renewable energy generation

75 per cent of school/work trips under 5 kilometres are walked, biked, or by transit, by 2030

8

Expand biking and pedestrian infrastructure, including the rollout of cycling routes, bicycle parking and bike share at or near Toronto Transit Commission stations

9

Increase existing bus and streetcar service levels to encourage shifts to low-carbon, sustainable transportation

10

Update and accelerate implementation of city-wide Transportation Demand Management Strategy

11

Develop tools to address emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants on an area or project level

30 per cent of registered vehicles in Toronto are electric, by 2030

12

Align the City’s Electric Vehicle Strategy to the net zero goals and implement the Electric Vehicle Strategy

13

Determine options to incentivize Electric Vehicle adoption and disincentivize use of gas and diesel vehicles

14

Encourage the adoption of electric commercial and freight vehicles, including Electric Vehicles and e-bikes for last mile deliveries

Identify pathways to more sustainable consumption in City of Toronto operations and in Toronto's economy

15

Continue to pursue policy and programmatic interventions that help the City reach its aspirational goals of zero waste and a circular economy, and which identify pathways to more sustainable consumption in both municipal operations and in all sectors of the economy

70 per cent residential waste diversion from the City of Toronto’s Integrated Waste Management System

16

Continue implementation of the City’s Long Term Waste Management Strategy which sets a goal of diverting 70 per cent of waste managed from City customers away from landfill, by focusing on waste reduction, reuse and recycling activities that promote resource conservation and reduce environmental impact

Develop and implement strategies to improve greenspace infrastructure to build climate resilience 

17

Increase canopy cover and biodiversity and enhance greenspaces

Ensure equitable implementation and ongoing improvement of engagement and reporting

18

Support resident-led climate action and engagement

19

 

Work with Indigenous rights holders and urban Indigenous communities to share knowledge and learnings

20

Develop and implement youth engagement strategy

21

Design and launch a climate advisory group for 2022 and beyond to ensure implementation of the Net Zero Strategy is equitable and reflects the priorities and interests of the community

22

Develop equity indicators to be reported out as part of the TransformTO implementation status update

23

Encourage the growth of green industry to provide the products and services needed to enable a net zero city

24

Leverage Live Green Toronto to develop and implement a city-wide climate action awareness campaign

Lead by Example – City of Toronto corporate greenhouse gas emissions are reduced by 65 per cent over 2008 base year

25

Develop and apply a Climate Lens in decision-making

26

Design and implement a Toronto Carbon Budget

27

Ensure net zero City-owned buildings

28

Reduce emissions from City and Agency-owned vehicles

29

Encourage City staff to adopt sustainable and climate positive practices at work and in their commute

30

Lead by example in managing waste and producing renewable energy from biogas at City facilities

 

City staff will begin further analysis and engagement on the thirty (30) short-term actions outlined in Attachment A as the City transitions to implementation.

 

Before 2030, two short-term implementation plans will be presented to Council -- the first one identifies actions to be delivered 2022 to 2025 (Attachment A), and the second one covering the period from 2026 to 2030 will outline additional actions that will ensure that we are on track to reach the 2030 target. Detailed reports outlining recommendations for bylaws, policies, and new programs will be brought back to City Council for consideration starting in 2022 and continuing over the following four years.  Included in this report back will be an assessment of our progress towards the goal of net zero by 2040. 

 

For the most part, the short-term actions do not require Toronto to pursue dramatically new climate actions -- they require Toronto to do them faster and at a larger scale. Existing strategies and plans such as Electric Vehicle Strategy, the Toronto Green Standard, the Net Zero Existing Buildings Strategy, Corporate Real Estate Management's Net Zero Carbon Plan for City-owned buildings, and the Toronto Transit Commission Green Bus Program are examples of plans that identify detailed steps and considerations to get to net zero.

 

The 2030 greenhouse gas emission reduction targets and short term actions have been developed through extensive consultation across City divisions and agencies, and with stakeholders and the public. Since 2019, the City has engaged over 5,000 residents, businesses, and other stakeholders to understand key priorities, opportunities and challenges. Consultations from recent years, particularly in 2021, have highlighted the issue of responding to the climate crisis with urgency.     

 

Current City Plans and Investments:

 

The City has approved a number of ambitious plans and targets to reduce emissions from its own operations, including the Corporate Real Estate Management's Net Zero Carbon Plan which was adopted earlier this year.  The Net Zero Carbon Plan focuses on City-owned buildings. Beginning with the 2023 Budget, staff will be integrating the Net Zero Carbon Plan for City-owned buildings into the capital planning process synchronously with the application of a Climate Lens and Financial Planning's Asset Management Strategy. The City will continue to make investments every year to achieve City Council-identified emissions reduction targets and net zero emissions status in its buildings. Like the Net Zero Carbon Plan for City-owned buildings, the Sustainable Fleets Plan, the Toronto Transit Commission Green Bus Program, and other key City plans will follow a similar process. Implementation of these plans is underway and will go a long way to reduce emissions from City operations.

 

For the first time in Toronto's history, a Climate Lens was utilized in the 2021 budget process. Initial data reported through the Climate Lens identified that Toronto invested $611.3 million on capital projects that have components related to GHG reduction or climate resilience in 2021. As 2021 reflected the first year of this initiative, data has not yet been collected across all divisions and agencies and these figures excluded climate investments made by key services such as Toronto Water, Toronto Community Housing Corporation and the Toronto Transit Commission. The 2022 Budget Process builds on the 2021 Budget process to evidence progress in cross corporate culture change including projects being flagged by programs that did not do so last year.  City staff are working to capture investments directly related to climate action in the 2022 budget. For example, the recommended 2022 Rate-Supported Budgets for water, solid waste, and parking identify climate related investments. In addition to this investment, the City is making significant capital investments in the Toronto Transit Commission – the 2021-2030 10-year Capital Plan totals $11.907 billion and includes $1.576 billion alone for vehicles such as buses, streetcars and subway cars, including the acquisition of electric buses to enable residents to reduce their transportation related greenhouse gas emissions.  Further, Toronto has also issued $630 million in Green Bonds which have financed a range of key climate projects targeting mitigation and resilience activities such as extending subway lines and expanding the local cycling network, to energy retrofits in social housing and flood protection projects.

 

Collaboration:

 

Many challenges outside of the City's control have also been identified through consultation, including the slow pace of market transformation, labour force training and matching expertise for implementation, consumer education and awareness, education of service providers, strong provincial and federal policy and financial support for decarbonization.

 

This report emphasizes that in order to be successful, bold leadership and collaboration will be required from public and private stakeholders.  Furthermore, innovative partnerships and business models must be supported and evolve and traditional economic priorities must include environmental cost-benefit analyses and climate outcomes.  To summarize, climate action means collective action.

 

Lastly the opportunities to avoid 'lock in' of carbon emissions in city systems are being missed.  Achieving the targets set out in this report, the TransformTO Short-Term Implementation Plan 2022-2025 (Attachment A) and the Net Zero Strategy (Attachment B) will require a different means of delivery and decision-making will need to be re-oriented so that the net zero choice becomes the best choice now and in the future.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2021) Report form the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services on TransformTO - Critical Steps for Net Zero by 2040
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173756.pdf
Attachment A - TransformTO Short-Term Implementation Plan 2022-2025
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173757.pdf
Attachment B - TransformTO Net Zero Strategy - A Climate Action Pathway to 2030 and Beyond
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173758.pdf
Attachment C - TransformTO Net Zero Framework Technical Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173759.pdf
Attachment D - Highlights of Toronto's Programs to Date
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173760.pdf
Attachment E - Summary of Public and Stakeholder Consultations (2018-2021)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173761.pdf
Attachment F - Small Engine Lawn and Garden Equipment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173762.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Presentation from the Interim Manager, Policy and Research, Environment and Energy Division on TransformTO - Critical Steps for Net Zero by 2040
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-174004.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 14, 2021) Supplementary report from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy on TransformTO - Critical Steps for Net Zero by 2040 (IE26.16a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174418.pdf

Speakers

Hilda Swirsky
Susan McMurray, Toronto and York Region Labour Council
Lyn Adamson, ClimateFast
Kathryn Tait, Toronto Environmental Alliance (TEA)
Samantha Green
Bryan Purcell , The Atmospheric Fund
Aaron Binder, Segway of Ontario
Sue Dexter, Harbord Village Residents’ Association
Shelagh Pizey-Allen, TTCriders
Harold B. Smith
Robert Stambula, Harbord Village Residents’ Association
Sharon Bider
John Stephenson, Citizens Climate Lobby
Sheena Sharp, Toronto 2030 District
Liz Addison
Lowell Lo
Julius Lindsay, David Suzuki Foundation
Carol Essex
Rebecca Weigand
Gabriella Kalapos, Clean Air Partnership
Julia Morgan
Martin Green
Paul Antze
Colleen Lynch
Valerie Endicott
Anne Keary
Sunday Harrison, Green Thumbs Growing Kids
Gord Rand
Manna Wong
Chris Ballard, Passive House Canada
Jennifer Knoch
Lee Adamson
Mike Yorke, Carpenters' District Council of Ontario
Cathy Nosaty
Jack Gibbons, Ontario Clean Air Alliance
Will Di Novi
Mary Helen Spence
Geoff Kettel, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (FoNTRA)
Beverley Thorpe, Parks not Planes
Laura Lindberg
Kevin Rupasinghe, Cycle Toronto
Kumsa Baker, Toronto Community Benefits Network (TCBN)
Diane Jameson, Parks Not Planes, BQNA
Dianne Saxe, Green Party of Ontario
Brian Iler, Parks not Planes
David Burman
Abhishek Chopra
Councillor Gord Perks

Communications (Committee)

(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Charles Fisch (IE.Main)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Debbie Green (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Arnaud Seigne (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dana Molckovsky (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Meredith-Karam (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janice Fraser (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Wilson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Anita Wong (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jill Glessing (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Nikhil Gupte (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Caitlin Ella Wind (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Midanik (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Chris Hobson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Cory Freedman (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gilles Marchildon (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Federle (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from James Barker (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Clark Whitney (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mike Lawler (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Juanita De Barros (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kris Langille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andreas Wille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Soroush Arghavan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jack Alvo (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Leslie Beedell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Angela Bischoff (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jorge Chaves (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Patrick DeRochie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Warren Haas (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Naomi Hazlett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Avrum Jacobson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Mesbur (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Moore (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Robinson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Steve Thoms (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Michael Warren (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Judith Wiechula (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Liz Miller (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeff Sauer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Erica Buchanan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marie Clermont (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Penina Coopersmith (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Luke Franceschini (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tim Grant (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessie Gunn (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Albert Koke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Derek Laurendeau (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lumley Murray (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lori Newton (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Meg O'Mahony (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lucy Perri (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kirk Philipps (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tina Faibish (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maren Woweries-Diallo (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Martin Gagne (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from John Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Zoraida Anaya (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tamara Bernstein (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kendrick Paterson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Edik Zwarenstein (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Claus Lensbøl (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mark Fernando (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Eliza Brandy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gord Doctorow (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gord Doctorow (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Debbie Green (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Lauren Blumas (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jagvir Brar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Holly Reid (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Daniel O'Donnell (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Hagit Fry (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Muroff (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Patrick N. (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ingrid Buday (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Oliver (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mourtaza Alsammak (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Suzanne Aplin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Riccardo Caimano (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Dicker (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rory Hiles (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marie Jagu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Malcom Kennedy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Ann Kerwin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jason Milligan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Heather Pierce (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jarek Piorkowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Christiane Schmidt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Pavlo Sirous (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Stokes (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Delfina Ortega-Paredes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Louloua Habli (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Carmona-Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Niall Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Vandendam (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Bozek (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Ryan Rivera (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Julia Armstrong (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Laura Bast (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Randall Boyd (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Taras Gula (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kelly Ng (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Troth (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ruth Allen (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mark Altmeyer (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ling Chiu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Carmen Jones (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Janet Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Elaine Luu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Liz Rykert (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Senal Serasinghe (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jenny Sin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Meg Southee (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Cathleen Sullivan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Henriette Terness (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ketan Vegda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Georgina Wilcock (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Robert Yu (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Rosemary Boissonneau (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jamie Liscombe (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cesar Shiao Mo (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janet Brooks (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Rob Dunder (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Vanessa Gentile (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Anne James (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Lewis (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Pat Martin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ivan Sherry (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Michael Szego (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Nadia Whitney (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timothy Lee (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alf Merson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brendan Hendel-McCarthy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Marc Marchild (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Anderson (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mario Maceda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ian Browne (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Shahnaz Stri-Shaikh (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Graham Lavender (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Julia Chew (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Duane Currie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Peter Ellement (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rebeca Furtado (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Vilma Gianfelice (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Miles Gripton (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Howard Henderson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dafydd Hughes (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gerald Lazare (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Lombardi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Francesco Menghi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from James Rolfe (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Leigh Evan Silcox (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Patricia Slavinski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cameron Tingley (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Shawnda Charron Nardia (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Spencer Roth (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Dianne Saxe (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matt Welke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ria Prakash (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jason Gallina (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Davis (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tania Szablowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Philipp Angermeyer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Melissa Avila (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Boaz Axelrad (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Hannes Bretschneider (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Michael Caldwell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthieu Caron (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Cooper (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jessica Costa (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dorian Douma (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from T.J. Goertz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Herberman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Hunter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeremy Knowles (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arturo M. (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Chris Thom (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maryanne Stone-Jimenez (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeremy Lundy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bailey Chui (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jonathan Hasbany (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ruth Silver (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Hugo Cordeau (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dan Horchik (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Knoch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lara Arabian (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timna Ben-Ari (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lisa Jayne (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Benjamin Lan (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Cliff Mewdell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alexei Miecznikowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maria Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrea Rae (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Adam Rosenfield (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathleen Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jim Crummey (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Hollett (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Carmen Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Reding (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gary Chow (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Ben Hanff (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Madeleine Sattler (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sam Arnold (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Norwin Anne (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ivana Marzura (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gavin Platt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Adam El-Masri (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Vanessa Faulkner (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Puru Panch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Zan Chandler (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Puru Panch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Andrea Grochalova (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Gerry (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Meghan Cheng (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Victoria Adilman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Evan Gilbert (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Hobbs (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Fleming (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Peter Donnelly (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Parisa Bahramloueian (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Simon Andrews (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Loudon Young (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from D. David Landart (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sochi Fried (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dr. T. Tyler Luyben (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Elise Hug (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Anne Ord (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Murumets (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Joey Carter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathy Laird (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Ilse Kramer (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Schiller (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Rahul Mehta (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Michele Zuuring (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jennifer Argles (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Scottie Wildman (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from José Salvador (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mary Kainer (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Sandra McCrossan (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Anita Wong (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Caitlin Ella Wind (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gray Taylor (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Danielle Millar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Midanik (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Gilles Marchildon (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Chris Hobson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Nikhil Gupte (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jill Glessing (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Martin Gagne (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Cory Freedman (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Federle (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Avrum Jacobson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Todd Aalgaard (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Maisa Ribeiro Barbosa (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Siobhan McLaughlin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Chris Heron (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tristan Durie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brendan Hendel-McCarthy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arthur Klimiwicz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Timothy Lee (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Marcello Mancuso (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Alf Merson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sean Ryan Rivera (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Greg Uchiyama (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mark Winter (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tom Worrall (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bruce Novakowski (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Cynthia Wilkey (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Leo Petrazickis (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ron Cuba (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ginny Côté (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Anderson (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ian Browne (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Severine Cathelin (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Steven Fistell (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Lynn Francis, Mark Lecker, etc (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Claire Hall (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Jose La Rose (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mario Maceda (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Marc Marchild (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Robert Staples (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Michael Stroud (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Elora Vink (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Karen Ward (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Maciej Karlowski (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Lori Spring (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Gerrit Boerman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Stan Nikipierowicz (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Neil Bartlett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Beryl Pilkington (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Dana Snell (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Brian B.K.G (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Melvin Mariampillai (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Stewart Pearson (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jeffrey Levitt (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Theresa Cooke (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from David Nash (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Isaac Berman (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Bruce Bennett (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Elizabeth Fedorkow (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Pam Koch (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Valérie Bolduc (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Aaron Rotenberg (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Sheldon Hellin (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Scott Misirlis (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from John Rubinstein (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Jiffin Arboleda (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kfir Lavi (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Tristan Durie (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Richard Wu (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kathleen Mackey (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Kaylee Harwood (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from James Carter (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Halim Ibrahima (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Beth Baskin (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Maya Watson (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Jay Fisher (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from Melanie Mcneill (IE.Supp)
(December 26, 2021) E-mail from John Thenganatt (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Manuel Calleja (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janice Fraser (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Ellen Greenblatt (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Tim Kraan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Janet Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Meredith-Karam (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Dana Molckovsky (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Murray (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Marjorie Nichol (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ed Rubinstein (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Arnaud Seigne (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Alison Stewart (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Alex Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Wilson (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Ian Worling (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Mary F Kennedy (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Neil Arcot (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Monica Henriques (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Kristian Bassi (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Lars Bryan (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Elizabeth Chrumka (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Cayla Clarkson (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Kai Davey-Bellin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Julia Ettlinger (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Lee Giles (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Hoyle (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Chris Jacobs (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Charles Lin (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jenny Wawrow (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Robert Kaross (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Abdullah (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Mauricio Argote-Cortes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Bozek (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Carmona-Murphy (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Shan Duan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Louloua Habli (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Stephan Huettenschmidt (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Niall Ryan (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Matthieu Schapira (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Susan Vandendam (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Lynn Walker (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Maria Yancheva (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Ingrid Buday (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Patrick N. (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Catherine Oliver (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Delfina Ortega-Paredes (IE.Supp)
(November 27, 2021) E-mail from Tierney Smith (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Mccluskey (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141693.pdf
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Sue Dexter, Board, Harbord Village Residents’ Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141727.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jeff Sun (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ignatius Sridhar (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Olivia Zhao (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Hertzman (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Zaid Rashid (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Zoraida Anaya (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Soroush Arghavan (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Lauren Blumas (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Jagvir Brar (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Juanita Da Barros (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mark Fernando (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Hagit Fry (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kris Langille (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Mike Lawler (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Claus Lensbol (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Muroff (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Kendreick Paterson (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Holly Reid (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from John Taranu (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Andreas Wille (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Martin Green (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141781.pdf
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from James Barker (IE.Supp)
(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Clark Whitney (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jim McPhail (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Vince Hughes (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Douglas Ferguson (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Lidia Labate (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Claire Smith (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Marc Boudreau (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from James O'Malley (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Robbins (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ethan Chiddicks (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Miriam Henriques (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Harold Smith (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Asil Gilani (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Alexander Stagnitta (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Sarah Martin (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Valérie Bolduc (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jack Derricourt (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Javed Nissar (IE.Supp)
(November 29, 2021) E-mail from Jacob Givertz-Steel (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Sharon Zeiler (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Marc Fowler (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Heather Schramm (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Di Camillo (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Alan Barthel (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from David Ley (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jeff Craig (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Naomi Miller (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from David Lussier (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Brian McLachlan (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Dundee Staunton, Chris Keating and John Watt (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) Letter from Kathy Laird (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Michael Polanyi (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Sana Amin (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rachel Wang (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ignatius Sridhar (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Amelia Rose Khan, Toronto350 (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141913.pdf
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Ronny Yaron (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from JJ Fueser (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rebecca Weigand (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Donna-Marie Batty, StopPlastics (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141920.pdf
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Margot Whittington, Climate Policy Analyst, The Atmospheric Fund (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141921.pdf
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Karen Chapple, Director, the School of Cities and Professor, University of Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141965.pdf
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Andria Babbington, President, Toronto and York Region Labour Council (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141966.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Lockhart (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Matthew Freedlander (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Mary Alton (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Mohammad Jaberi (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Liz Addison (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Lee Scott (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Julie Sieg (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Natalie Telfer (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Dave Ley (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Ms. A. Pope, Coordinator, Zero Waste Hub Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141987.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Wendy Quirion (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Derek Eaton (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Chris Gusz (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gabrielle Herman (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Gyula Kovacs (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Rhonda Teitel-Payne Co-Coordinator, Toronto Urban Growers (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142005.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Theodore Lam (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Sylvia Grady (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Steven Fistell (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Steve Rieck (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Spencer Roth (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Sonja Greckol (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Chris, Sharon, and Jim Gusz (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Sharon Bider (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Sandra Lester (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Avi D. (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Deborah Nixon (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Janet Senyshyn (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Aaron Binder (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Richard Nelson, Holly Reid, Najia Zewari, Executive Committee, Cycle Don Valley Midtown (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142034.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Debbie Green (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ryann Fineberg (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rocky Petkov (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Benjamin Ian Vladamir Gernega (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Colleen Lynch (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Alex Ross (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Urbanski (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Ellery Williamson (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Jacob Dawang, More Neighbours Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142038.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Michelle Reddick (IE.Supp)
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Ria Prakash (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Patrick McCluskey (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Keagan Gartz, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142064.pdf
(December 1, 2021) Letter from Carlyle Coutinho, Chief Executive Officer, Enwave Energy Corporation (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142066.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Kathy Glazier (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from JP Solmes, President and Chief Executive Officer, Trimac Renewable Royalties (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142068.pdf
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Joshua Armstrong (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Darnel Harris, Executive Director, Our Greenway Conservancy (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142056.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rebecca McKenzie (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Kumsa Baker, Campaigns Director and Rosemarie Powell, Executive Director, Toronto Community Benefits Network (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142060.pdf
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Abhishek Chopra (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Jeffrey Wyndowe (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Eric Walberg (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Jane Church (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Gabriel Mandelbaum (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (IE.Supp)
(November 30, 2021) E-mail from Jacob Dawang (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Caterina Borracci (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Sheena Sharp, Co-Chair, Pathways Project (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142082.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Irene Alatzakis (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Aliya Hirji (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Gordon (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Jay Scott (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Anne Hogarth (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Peter Rogers (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Omkara Patel (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Patrick McCartney (IE.Supp)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from David Langille (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Adria Budd Johnson (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Christine Bear (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Sunday Harrison, Executive Director, Green Thumbs Growing Kids (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142111.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Kathryn Tait, Climate Specialist, Toronto Environmental Alliance (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142112.pdf
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Hilda Swirsky (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Donna-Marie Batty, StopPlastics (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142114.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Kathryn Tait, Climate Specialist, Toronto Environmental Alliance (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142098.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from David Langille, Chair, Pocket Change Committee (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142099.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Lyn Adamson, Co-Chair, ClimateFast (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142115.pdf
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Liz Addison, ClimateFast (IE.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142100.pdf
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Cathy Nosaty (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Jean Paul Morgan (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Irene Alatzakis (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Sandra Lester (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Valerie Endicott (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from Lee Adamson (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Quentin Thwaites (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Avet Khachatryan (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Florence Foerster (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Agnes Kramer-Hamstra (IE.New)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Cecilia Farrol (IE.New)

Communications (City Council)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Rob MacLellan (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Agnes Kramer-Hamstra (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Cecilia Farrol (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Shanaaz Sheriff (CC.Main)
(December 2, 2021) Letter from David Burman, Andrea Stephens, Paul Overy and Bjørnar Egede-Nissen, Drawdown Toronto (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142396.pdf
(December 2, 2021) E-mail from Tania Gill, on behalf of Music Declares Emergency Canada (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142397.pdf
(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Bob Carreau (CC.Main)
(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Julian Alvarez-Barkham (CC.Main)
(December 4, 2021) E-mail from Julie Mollins (CC.Main)
(December 5, 2021) E-mail from Dr. Erin Campos (CC.Main)
(December 6, 2021) E-mail from Claire Hao (CC.Main)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Brandon Evangelista (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) Letter from Cynthia Hansen, Executive Vice President and President, Gas Distribution and Storage, Enbridge (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142480.pdf
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Laura Stein (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Javed Nissar (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Garnet Lollar (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Jacob Givertz-Steel (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Justin Bull (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142488.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Aditya Trivedi (CC.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Ewa Lipsztajn (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Roselle Martino, Vice President, Public Policy, Toronto Region Board of Trade (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142590.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Jacob Dawang, More Neighbours Toronto (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142612.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Adam DaSilva, Executive Vice President, Stafford (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142575.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Fred Serrafero, Senior Vice President - Principal, FRAM Building Group (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142663.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Bruno Glancola, Senior Vice President, Project Management, Innovation and Sustainability and Graem Armster, Director, Innovation and Sustainability, Deltera (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142679.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Submission from Kelly Graham, Planner, SvN Architects + Planners Inc. (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142716.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Anthony Fragale, Director of Construction, Greenpark Group (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142717.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Jeffrey Ranson, Sr. Director, Energy, Environment, and Advocacy, BOMA (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142718.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Tam Goossen and Carolyn Egan, Co-Chairs, Good Jobs for All (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142720.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Submission from Andria Babbington, Toronto and York Region Labour Council (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142688.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Myer Godfrey, Yorkwood Building Group (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142724.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Marco De Simone, President, Royalpark Homes Inc. (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142692.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Paul De Berardis, Director of Building Science & Innovation, and Richard Lyall, President, The Residential Construction Council of Ontario (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142693.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Jeremy Alter, The Goldman Group (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142694.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Jorge Godinho, President, Canadian Concrete Forming Ltd. (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142730.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Kevin Lockhart, Efficient Buildings Lead, Efficiency Canada (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142731.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Darius Rybak, Vice President, Operations, High Rise, Aspen Ridge Homes (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142807.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Samantha Dunlop, Manager, Chestnut Hill Developments (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142808.pdf
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Ms. A. Pope, Coordinator(Volunteer), Zero Waste Hub Toronto (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142824.pdf
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Patricia Hawk (CC.New)
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Marta Stares (CC.New)

IE26.17 - Extending the Home Energy Loan Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the extension of the Home Energy Loan Program component of the Residential Energy Retrofit Programs from its current expiration date of December 31, 2021 and make the Program permanent, using existing resources in the Local Improvement Charge Energy Works Reserve Fund, Local Improvement Charge repayments as well as funding provided by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to support project and programming needs.  

 
2. City Council authorize the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to establish program interest rates for the Home Energy Loan Program based on the City’s projected indicative cost of borrowing, set on a quarterly basis, for the purposes of recovering the City's cost of borrowing.

 
3. City Council authorize the Director, Environment and Energy to enter into any Property Owner Agreement for the City of Toronto Home Energy Loan Program with consenting property owners for any financing to a maximum of $125,000, inclusive of funding amount, interest and administrative fee, in addition to authority granted previously to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 
4. City Council authorize the Director, Environment and Energy to review and, where necessary, revise the Home Energy Loan Program from time to time, solely for the purpose of integrating the City's program with industry best practices and new or existing Federal, Provincial and utility company energy, climate change and poverty reduction programs.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Report from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy

Summary

Through the Home Energy Loan Program, the City offers low-interest loans to help homeowners make their homes more energy efficient and reduce Greenhouse Gas emissions, in support of the City’s TransformTO climate action strategy and net-zero emissions target.

 

Current authorization for the program will expire as of December 31, 2021, the purpose of this report is to extend authorization of the Home Energy Loan Program in its current form and to enable continuation of the program with planned Federation of Canadian Municipalities funded changes subject to finalizing an agreement with Federation of Canadian Municipalities.

 

Extending and enhancing the Home Energy Loan Program program with Federation of Canadian Municipalities funding will help advance the Council-approved Greenhouse Gas reduction efforts established by TransformTO, Toronto's climate action strategy and the net zero ambitions outlined in the Climate Emergency Declaration and most recently the goals of the Net Zero Existing Buildings Strategy adopted by City Council in July 2021.  The Home Energy Loan Program program will also support the City's Net Zero Strategy, being considered by Infrastructure and Environment Committee at its meeting of December 2, 2021.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Report from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy on Extending the Home Energy Loan Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173440.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141694.pdf

Declared Interests (Committee)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Mike Layton - IE26.17 - Has a pecuniary interest as he has submitted an application to the Home Energy Program, which has been approved, and he intends to enter into a Property Owner Agreement with the City.
Written Declaration: https://secure.toronto.ca/council/declared-interest-file.do?id=10376

IE26.18 - Wastewater Energy Transfer Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council endorse facilitating the use of the City's wastewater infrastructure, right-of-way, and property where feasible to facilitate renewable thermal energy projects aimed at significantly reducing greenhouse gases emissions and moving the City closer to achieving its net zero emissions goal.

 

2. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, to establish a working group consisting of the Division Heads or their designates from the Environment and Energy, Toronto Water, Corporate Real Estate Management, Transportation Services, Engineering and Construction Services, Legal Services, Financial Planning and any other necessary Divisions, to develop an implementation plan for Part 1 above that includes, without limitation, post-screening application review process and procedures, design and technical standards, template agreements, real estate valuations, and project revenue allocations.

 

3. City Council direct the Director, Environment and Energy to report to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the second quarter of 2022 with details about the implementation plan for the Wastewater Energy Transfer Program and with recommendations for authority needed to launch the full program.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

 

Infrastructure and Environment Committee considered items IE26.16 and IE26.18 together.

Origin

(November 17, 2021) Report from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy

Summary

This report proposes the launch in First Quarter of 2022 of the first stage of a new, city-wide evaluation framework for initial connection requests for potential Wastewater Energy Transfer projects, as was requested by Council in 2019.

 

Wastewater Energy Transfer projects involve a connection to City wastewater (sewer) infrastructure for the non-contact exchange of renewable thermal energy to displace fossil fuel use in buildings, which is Toronto's largest source of greenhouse gas emissions. Enabling Wastewater Energy Transfer projects is therefore a key part of implementing the TransformTO Net Zero Strategy.

 

Toronto's sanitary trunk sewer network is estimated to have the capacity to potentially support well over twenty Wastewater Energy Transfer projects. Once in operation, these projects would reduce approximately 200,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions annually while unlocking value for the City through the sale of thermal energy. 

 

An evaluation framework is necessary for timely processing of connection requests and to ensure projects do not negatively affect operation/integrity of Toronto Water infrastructure.              

 

Stage 1 - Launch First Quarter of 2022 for project intake to gauge interest, size/types of projects, and specific locations/timelines.

 

- Renewable energy developers/building owners visit a City webpage to undertake self-serve project screening and submit a preliminary application.


- Environment and Energy Division staff review the application for completeness so that Toronto Water staff can provide the applicant with information needed for preliminary design/business case.
 

Prior to launching Stage 2 in Second Quarter/Third Quarter of 2022, which would enable full applications to the program, staff will establish an efficient back-office process for post-screening detailed application review with other key Divisions, including: Toronto Water, Transportation Services, Engineering and Construction Services, Corporate Real Estate Management, and Legal Services.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 17, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy on Wastewater Energy Transfer Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173428.pdf

Speakers

John Stephenson, Citizens Climate Lobby

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141722.pdf

IE26.19 - Update - Pocket Plus Neighbourhood Climate Action

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council direct the Director, Environment and Energy and the relevant Division Head and Corporation Officials to continue to advance the next phase of Pocket Change Neighbourhood Climate Action Plan, including the community and institutional round-tables, and include updates in TransformTO progress reports.

Origin

(November 22, 2021) Report from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy

Summary

This report responds to a Council request in February 2021 for the Interim Director, Environment and Energy and the relevant Division Heads, City Corporation Officials, and School Boards, to support the next phase of Pocket Change Neighbourhood Climate Action Plan, including the creation of an institutional round-table, and that staff submit a report on the scope and opportunities for the institutional opportunities to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee.

 

The City is supporting the next phase of the Pocket Change Plus project, as a neighbourhood scale implementation of TransformTO, with efforts to leverage institutional assets and expertise to 'green' the neighbourhood and maximize opportunities for environmental transformation.

 

The Environment and Energy led the coordination of institutional stakeholders by organizing regular discussions and supporting partner organizations in the review of capital budgets, the evaluation of asset conditions, and identifying potential sustainability initiatives.

 

Attached is the draft report with scope, opportunities, and quick starts for climate action, including, but not limited to:

 

- Institutional commitments to achieve climate objectives and targets set out by TransformTO net-zero plan (concurrently reporting to committee and Council)


- Efforts to embed climate and resiliency lens within decision making processes.


- Initiated Energy Audits and Feasibility Work streams: solar at Greenwood Yard.


- Exploring Net-Zero pathways for Toronto Community Housing and other City buildings.


- Opportunities for public and/or institutional lands with potential for co-benefits: environmental, social, and net-zero initiatives.


- Potential design competition to synthesize the architectural, communal, and environmental components of sustainable neighborhoods - focus on public realm.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 22, 2021) Report from the Interim Director, Environment and Energy on Update - Pocket Plus Neighbourhood Climate Action
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173741.pdf
Attachment 1 - The Pocket Plus Scope, Opportunities, and Quick Starts - Nov 2021 (Draft)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173742.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Tim Ellis, Board Member, Mimico Residents Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141723.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Martin Green (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-141782.pdf
(November 26, 2021) E-mail from Arturo MP (IE.Supp)
(December 1, 2021) Letter from David Langille, Chair, Pocket Change Project of the Pocket Community Association (IE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/comm/communicationfile-142090.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Michael Holloway (CC.Supp)

IE26.22 - Additional North Bendale Park Identification Signs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Scarborough - Guildwood

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to install additional Identification Signs in North Bendale Park at the entrances off the following streets:

 

a. Baybrook Crescent;

 

b. Faraday Drive;

 

c. Erinlea Crescent;

 

d. Monmouth Court;

 

e. Parkington Crescent,

 
and to review options in order to differentiate and identify each sign location to the park for navigation purposes for emergency vehicles response to crisis, in particular, health and safety. 

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Letter from Councillor Paul Ainslie, Ward 24, Scarborough-Guildwood

Summary

I am requesting that Parks, Forestry and Recreation install additional park identification signs at North Bendale Park at the five street entrances stated above. Additionally, I would like to request respective staff to review options, i.e. numbering each sign, to differentiate each identification sign for emergency vehicles responding to a crisis, in particular, health and safety.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Letter from Councillor Paul Ainslie, Ward 24, Scarborough-Guildwood on Additional North Bendale Park Identification Signs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173425.pdf

IE26.23 - Extending the Existing Parking Exemptions (Statutory Holidays) to Include Holidays of Religious Significance

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Toronto Police Service, to report back to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee in the Second Quarter of 2022 on the feasibility of providing parking exemptions on City streets during religious holidays.

Origin

(November 18, 2021) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre-Downsview

Summary

Every year, faith based communities across the City, reconnect with their family, friends and loved ones while celebrating specific religious holidays rooted in their respective faith traditions. Several religious holidays that are observed by Torontonians of various backgrounds, creeds and beliefs should be accommodated for by parking exemptions. Currently, only statutory holidays are exempted. Integrating religious holidays as well may not only allow for people's sincerely held creed, beliefs, and practices to be accommodated for but more importantly lead to more inclusive neighbourhoods that celebrate the diverse mosaic and cultural fabric of Toronto.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2021) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 6, York Centre-Downsview on Extending the Existing Parking Exemptions (Statutory Holidays) to Include Holidays of Religious Significance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173590.pdf

IE26.24 - Reviewing a Pedestrian-Cycling Bridge Over Allen Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Committee Recommendations

The Infrastructure and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake a preliminary review to understand the feasibility, constraints / impacts and cost of a pedestrian-cycling bridge over Allen Road to connect the York Beltline Trail and Kay Gardner Beltline Trail.

Origin

(December 2, 2021) Letter from Councillor Mike Colle, Ward 8, Eglinton-Lawrence

Summary

During the pandemic, cycling has increased across the City and more spaces encouraging active transportation and supporting the overall wellbeing of residents through cycling, walking, and jogging, have been urgently needed.

 

An opportunity exists to close a critical gap in between two of the City's great multi-use trails: the York Beltline Trail and Kay Gardner Beltline Trail are divided by the Allen Expressway and are widely used by pedestrians and cyclists alike. A pedestrian-cycling bridge spanning across the Allen would ultimately form a continuous, 9 kilometre park within the City, west of the Allen all the way to Mount Pleasant Road closing a significant missing link. This east-west connection would enhance the City's Cycling Network Plan which seeks to connect gaps and grow the current cycling network across the City.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 2, 2021) Letter from Councillor Mike Colle, Ward 8, Eglinton-Lawrence, on Reviewing a Pedestrian-Cycling Bridge Over Allen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ie/bgrd/backgroundfile-173976.pdf

Planning and Housing Committee - Meeting 29

PH29.1 - Technical Amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1031 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council enact the Zoning By-law amendments substantially in accordance with Attachment 1 to the report (October 27, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Zoning By-law amendments as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on November 25, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(October 27, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report proposes technical amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 to correct typographical errors; add, remove or replace words; revise regulations in order to clarify or correct interpretations; and make adjustments to zoning and overlay map boundaries.

 

Technical changes are also proposed to site-specific zoning by-law amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 to correct minor errors.

 

All proposed revisions are in keeping with Council's intentions when first approved by Council, and do not affect the substance of the respective by-laws.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 27, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Technical Amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173087.pdf
Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173088.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-172903.pdf

PH29.2 - Changing Lanes: The City of Toronto's Review of Laneway Suites - Monitoring Program and Zoning By-law Amendments- Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1046 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment appended as Attachment 4 to the report (November 9, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;  

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required;

 

3. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning consult with staff in Seniors Services and Long-Term Care, and any other civic officials, on incorporating Laneway Suite recommendations and best practices to accommodate and support seniors living in missing middle housing as part of any future updates to Townhouse And Low-Rise Apartment Guidelines and/or any guideline documents developed resulting from the Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods initiative; and

 

4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation, in consultation with the Chief Building Official, the Director, Environment and Energy, and other civic officials, report to Planning and Housing Committee in the first quarter of 2023 or as soon as possible regarding potential strategies to protect and enhance the City’s tree canopy and growing space, while also supporting infill housing growth in the City’s Neighbourhoods.

 

5. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation, in consultation with the Chief Building Official, the Director, Environment and Energy, and other civic officials to meet the City's TransformTO Net Zero Strategy and to increase onsite green space, landscaping and the tree canopy while striving to promote ecologically responsive construction techniques and materials.

 

6. City Council request the Chief Planner and  Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation to investigate the feasibility of inspecting all completed laneway and garden suites and their compliance to the bylaws as it pertains to the percentage of growing space and tree canopy remaining in these lots.

 

7. City Council, direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation, to require as a condition of approval of a laneway and garden suite, that, if applicable, a canopy tree be retained or planted elsewhere on the lot.

 

8. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to communicate with the Committee of Adjustment members that the City of Toronto in 2019 declared a climate emergency and that TransformTO Net Zero Strategy should be considered in all their decisions as it is affected by the impact of reduced growing space and loss tree canopies.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on November 25, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 9, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

Laneway suites are a type of second unit permitted in the City of Toronto. A laneway suite is a self-contained residential unit located in its own building, often in the back yard, on a lot adjacent to a public laneway. Laneway suites provide an additional form of low-rise housing within the City's neighbourhoods and are part of complete communities. They provide more opportunities for people to live close to where they work, shop, and play and, can help make the city's urban lanes more green, liveable, and safe. Laneway suites contribute to increasing the supply of rental housing and provide additional housing options for a variety of household configurations, and people in different stages of life.

 

On June 26, 2018, City Council approved Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to allow laneway suites within the boundaries of the Toronto and East York District as the boundaries existed in 2018. On July 16, 2019, City Council expanded permission for laneway suites to low-rise residential zones in Zoning By-law 569-2013 across the City.  As of May 2021, 238 building permit applications for new laneway suites have been submitted to the City.

 

Along with approving bylaw and policy changes to allow the construction of laneway suites, City Council directed City staff monitor the implementation of laneway suites and report on a range of matters to Planning and Housing Committee. The City retained Gladki Planning Associates to assist the City in undertaking a thorough review of laneway suite applications. The City also held a variety of consultation events, visited numerous laneway suite properties, and hosted meetings with a variety of stakeholders including residents, the building industry, the many groups consulted on the 2018-2019 Changing Lanes Study, and Councillors offices.

 

This report discusses the outcome of the laneway suite review and monitoring work and recommends several strategic amendments to the laneway suite permissions to facilitate their construction and respond to community comments.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 9, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Changing Lanes: The City of Toronto's Review of Laneway Suites - Monitoring Program and Zoning By-law Amendments- Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173157.pdf
Attachment 2 - Report from Gladki Planning Associates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173158.pdf
Attachment 3 - Proposed Zoning Changes shown as marked up 569-2013 text
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173159.pdf
Attachment 4 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (By-law No. 569-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173148.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-172901.pdf

Speakers

Katie Thomas
Celeste Salvagna, Planning, Urban Design and Landscape Architecture
Andy Choles, Long Branch Neighbourhood Association
Sue Dexter
Harold Smith
Sheila Harrison, the South Armour Heights Residents’ Association (SAHRA)
Veronica Wynne, Confederation of Resident & Ratepayer Associations
Frummie Diamond, Palmerston Area Residents' Association (PARA) Green Committee
Ken Sharratt
Alex Petrovic
Ian Carmichael, ABC Residents Association
Cathie McDonald, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (Fontra)
Ingrid van Weert, Thompson Orchards Community Association Inc.
Mary Helen Spence

Communications (Committee)

(November 8, 2021) E-mail from Jeremy Gawen, Director, Moore Park Residents Association (MPRA) (PH.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-139909.pdf
(November 9, 2021) E-mail from Tom Knezic, Principal, Solares Architecture - LNWY (PH.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-139888.pdf
(November 15, 2021) E-mail from Daryl Christoff (PH.Main)
(November 6, 2021) E-mail from F.T. Campbell, Kingsway Park Ratepayers Inc. (PH.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140085.pdf
(November 16, 2021) Letter from William H. Roberts, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CORRA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140105.pdf
(October 26, 2021) Letter from Eldon Theodore, MHBC Planning, Urban Design and Landscape Architecture (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140106.pdf
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Barbara Frost and Miodrag Cvitkovic (PH.New)
(November 20, 2021) E-mail from Dan Rishworth, Bedford-Wanless Ratepayers Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140137.pdf
(November 20, 2021) Letter from France Rochette, Upper Avenue Community Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140139.pdf
(November 22, 2021) Letter from Rick Green, Federation of South Toronto Residents' Association (FoSTRA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140169.pdf
(November 22, 2021) Letter from Harold Smith (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) Letter from Sue Dexter, Harbord Village Residents' Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140228.pdf
(November 22, 2021) Letter from Cindy Weiner, St. Andre's Ratepayers Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140190.pdf
(November 22, 2021) Letter from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh (PH.New)
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Sheila Dunlop, Secretary, South Armour Heights Residents Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140292.pdf
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Ken Sharratt (PH.New)
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Maureen Kapral, Vice-President, Lytton Park Residents’ Organization (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140346.pdf
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Rita Bilerman, chair, Annex Residents' Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140347.pdf
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Steve Dewdney, Vice-chair, Bloor West Village Residents Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140348.pdf
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Katherine Thomas (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140349.pdf
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Ann Mullen on behalf of Seaton Village Residents’ Committee for Sensible Laneway Housing (PH.New)
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Terry Mills, Arris Strategy Studio (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140351.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Ian Carmichael, Co-Chair, ABC Residents Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140352.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140365.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Ingrid van Weert, Director, Thompson Orchard Community Association Inc. (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140366.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from William H. Roberts, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CORRA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140370.pdf
(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Lauren Podmore (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Janet May on behalf of Cliffcrest Scarborough Village SW Residents Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140376.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Veronica Wynne, Swansea Area Ratepayers Association and Group (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140386.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Submission from Mary Helen Spence, ABC Residents Association, Fontra Working Group (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140388.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from David Reid, Secretary, Bayview-Sheppard Neighbourhood Alliance (BSNA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140392.pdf
(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Dodds (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Frummie Diamond, Chair, Palmertston Area Residents' Association, Green Committee (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140405.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Judy Gibson and Andy Choles, Long Branch Neighbourhood Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140435.pdf
(November 25, 2021) E-mail from Patrick Sheils (PH.New)

PH29.3 - Recommended Parking Requirements for New Development

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a revised supplementary report on this Item (PH29.3a with recommendations).

Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Mayor's second Key Matter and second Item of business on Wednesday, December 15th

Bill 1043 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (November 10, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to update automobile parking standards.

 

2. City Council amend the Zoning By-law 569-2013 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 2 to the report (November 10, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to update bicycle parking standards.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills contemplated in Recommendation 2 above, to City Council for enactment, the elements necessary for the successful implementation of the Payment-in-Lieu of Bicycle Parking provision must be in place, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, including the establishment of a reserve fund and the necessary updates to the City's business systems.

 

5. City Council delegate approval and signing authority to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and his or her representatives for agreements related to payments-in-lieu of bicycle parking under Clause 230.5.10.11(7) of Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

6. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to use $500 per "short-term" bicycle parking space reduced, adjusted for inflation, as the basis upon which payments under Clause 230.5.10.11(7) of Zoning By-law 569-2013, as amended, be calculated.

 

7. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or designate to report to the appropriate standing committee annually on the exercise of any delegated authority in Recommendation 5 above.

 

8. City Council approve the establishment of an obligatory reserve fund called the 'Payment-In-Lieu of Bicycle Parking Reserve Fund' in Appendix C, Schedule 17, Parking Authority Reserve Funds of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227, Reserves and Reserve Funds, the purpose of which is to receive payments-in-lieu of bicycle parking contributions received pursuant to Section 40 of Planning Act with monies applied to the acquisition of new bike share stations and bike share bicycles with criteria as set out in Attachment 3 to the report (November 10, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

 

9. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in collaboration with the General Manager, Transportation Services, to include potential amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking in order to exclude residents of, visitors to or tradespersons at addresses associated with new Zoning By-law Amendment Applications in all directions reports or final reports, where the addresses have not already been excluded.

 

10. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to include the following as approval conditions at the earliest opportunity in the development application and review process for all Re-Zoning, Official Plan, or Site Plan Control Applications:

 

  • The Owner shall insert the advisory clause contained in Attachment 4 of this report into all purchases, agreements of purchase and sale or agreements to lease, and condominium declaration document(s) for each affected residential unit within the Development.
  • The Owner must notify the Manager, Parking and Administration, Transportation Services Division that their property located at [replace with address of development] is to be excluded from permit parking area [replace with applicable parking area].

11. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report periodically so that City Council can consider amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to exclude residents of, visitors to or tradespersons at properties about which they have been notified are to be removed.

 

12. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to revise the performance measures for electric vehicle requirements in the Toronto Green Standard Version 4 in accordance with the revised Zoning Bylaw.

 

13. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to continue work on the Review of Parking Requirements in the Zoning By-law as part of the City-wide Parking Strategy. This work should include:

  • Exploration of options to ensure access to Type A accessible spaces for users of accessible vans;
  • Review of required minimum rates for accessible parking spaces;
  • Review of the City's Guidelines for the Design and Management of Bicycle Parking Facilities;
  • Review of the required minimum rates for bicycle parking in Zoning By-law 569-2013;
  • Development of guidelines for travel demand management guide for the City to apply when considering development applications, when evaluating whether developments have met the Toronto Green Standard requirements related to single-occupant vehicle trip reductions, and in assessing the adequacy of mobility provisions in the City-initiated development;
  • Establishment of a parking monitoring program; and
  • Review of Chapter 220 - Loading Space Regulations of Zoning By-law 569-2013
  • Review the visitor parking requirements
  • Review the Electric Vehicle requirements

14. City Council direct the Chief Planner, and Executive Director to consider the impact of changes in Parking Requirements for New Development on the economic modelling underlying Toronto's Inclusionary Zoning bylaw as part of the next review of the Inclusionary Zoning by-law.

 

15. City Council request the Province of Ontario to reconsider Community Benefits Charges in light of the savings for developers and the additional demand for public transit created by the changes in Parking Requirements for New Developments.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee:

 

1. Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report directly to the December 15, 2021 meeting of City Council on whether to apply the proposed parking rates to any future development on Blocks 2 and 4 in Plan of Subdivision 66M-2265 for 1400 Weston Road.

 

2. Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to prepare a supplementary report directly to City Council with relevant information regarding the application of the proposed parking policy for new developments in areas outside of downtown.

 

The Program Manager Transportation Planning, City Planning gave a presentation on Recommended Parking Requirements for New Development.

 

The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on November 25, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Summary

This report recommends the adoption of Zoning By-law Amendments to the city-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 to modify the current standards for automobile and bicycle parking. These standards were adopted by Council in 2013 and based on a series of studies conducted between 2005 and 2007. The majority of the regulations for parking spaces, and bicycle parking spaces were approved without modifications as per a Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Order dated October 3, 2019. The Zoning By-law Amendments respond to the request made by Planning and Housing Committee for a review of the City's parking requirements in the Zoning By-law 569-2013. The recommended Zoning By-law Amendments (Attachment 1 and 2) reflect staff's analysis, feedback received through public consultations, discussions with relevant City Divisions and Agencies, and research across other major cities.

 

Updating the City's parking standards to better manage auto dependency and achieve a better balance between building too much or too little parking ultimately contributes to building more sustainable and healthy communities. The City is facing several major challenges including a climate emergency; decreasing housing affordability; and increasing demand for mobility. While not sufficient on its own to overcome these challenges, more strategic, thoughtful management of the parking supply will contribute to addressing all of these challenges.

 

In order to achieve Council's target for net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, aggressive action must be taken to curb the emissions from the transportation sector. Minimum parking requirements lead to the overbuilding of parking and support the continued growth of those emissions. Introducing maximum parking permissions will slow that growth in automobile use and resultant emissions.

 

Housing affordability is a significant challenge in Toronto. The cost of constructing and maintaining parking is significant; minimum parking requirements limits households' ability to avoid those costs. Further, minimum parking requirements may result in households in multi-unit residential buildings who do not own automobiles subsidizing the cost of parking for other residents of the building who do. This is inequitable, as higher-income households are more likely to own automobiles.

 

Easily available parking encourages people to drive more often. More people driving contributes to worsening traffic congestion, slowing transit operating in mixed traffic and making it more difficult to improve travel conditions for alternatives like transit, walking and cycling. To accommodate the growing demand for travel that will come with the City's growing population and employment base, the City will need to promote more space efficient modes of travel and discourage automobile travel.

 

Recognizing these challenges, this review of the parking standards in the city-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 was guided by the principle that parking standards should allow only the maximum amount of automobile parking reasonably required for a given use and minimums should be avoided except where necessary to ensure equitable access. New developments will still have to provide adequate parking onsite, and not assume residents will be able to park on street.

 

The resulting recommended Amendments to the Zoning By-law will more aggressively implement Official Plan policies related to discouraging auto dependence and encouraging walking, cycling and transit over other modes of passenger travel, clarify expectations related to the provision of infrastructure to support lower parking rates and simplify the Zoning By-law. The Amendments also support the City's climate action strategy, TransformTO, and Provincial land use policies, namely the Provincial Policy Statement and the Growth Plan (2019) as amended. Among other things, the Amendments would:

  • Create two new Parking Zones to administer the recommended parking rates;
  • Group existing land uses into categories to simplify and reduce the number of parking rates;
  • Eliminate most minimum parking standards;
  • Introduce maximum parking standards where they do not already exist, for most uses;
  • Eliminate the use of Parking Occupancy Rates;
  • Maintain or increase accessible parking requirements;
  • Introduce requirements for electric vehicle infrastructure and permissions for charging equipment within required parking space dimensions;
  • Increase "short-term" bicycle parking rates for residential uses in Bicycle Zone 1 and introduce a payment-in-lieu of bicycle parking provision;
  • Amend zone-specific regulations related to parking to accommodate the replacement of parking minimums with parking maximums; and
  • Introduce other requirements to support low parking rates.

These changes will reduce the growth of the City's parking supply while allowing those who need parking to have access to it. The removal of minimum parking standards does not remove existing parking, nor prevent new parking from being built. Staff will continue to work across divisions and agencies to advance the City's policy objectives related to parking, including further revisions to the Zoning By-law and a review of the City's current approach to residential on-street parking, front yard parking and boulevard parking.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2021) Report and Attachments 3 and 4 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on Recommended Parking Requirements for New Development
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173150.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173161.pdf
Attachment 2 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment pertaining to Payment-in-Lieu of Bicycle Parking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173151.pdf
Attachment 5 - Consultation Summary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173152.pdf
Attachment 6 - Diagrams of Permitted Installation Locations for EV Infrastructure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173162.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-172905.pdf
Presentation from the Program Manager Transportation Planning, City Planning on Recommended Parking Requirements for New Development
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173818.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 15, 2021) Revised Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Recommended Parking Requirements for New Development (PH29.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174408.pdf
Revised Attachment 1 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174409.pdf
Revised Attachment 2 - Memo - Economic Impacts of Removal of Minimum City Parking Standard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174410.pdf
Revised Attachment 3 - Sample of Mixed-Use and Residential Apartment Projects with at least One Planning Approval and Known Parking Requirements Active Between 2013 and 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174411.pdf
Revised Attachment 4 - Selling Price of Parking Spaces in Active High-Rise Developments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174412.pdf

Speakers

Rocky Petkov
Andy Choles, Long Branch Neighbourhood Association
Bradley Wentworth
Steven Vella
David Scrivener
Geoff Kettel, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (Fontra)
Rick Green, Federation of South Toronto Residents Associations
Councillor Paul Ainslie

Communications (Committee)

(November 7, 2021) E-mail from Michael Capotosto (PH.Main)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Davenport Triangle Residents Association (PH.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-139885.pdf
(November 8, 2021) E-mail from Mel Rapp, Rapp Optical (PH.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140006.pdf
(November 18, 2021) E-mail from Jesse de Leon (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Richard Lyall, Residential Construction Council of Ontario (RESCON) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140091.pdf
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Shane Keulen (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Jacob Givertz-Steel (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Stephen de Rusett (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Yoshua Wakeham (PH.New)
(November 19, 2021) E-mail from Jovana Jankovic (PH.New)
(November 19, 2021) E-mail from Ramsey Kilani (PH.New)
(November 19, 2021) E-mail from Bilal Akhtar (PH.New)
(November 20, 2021) E-mail from Conrad Owen (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) Letter from Rick Green, Federation of South Toronto Residents' Association (FoSTRA) (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140170.pdf
(November 21, 2021) E-mail from Hardik Jogi (PH.New)
(November 21, 2021) E-mail from Daven Boparai (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Luke Andrews (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Philipp Angermeyer (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) Letter from Anthony Fragale, Greenpark Group (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140171.pdf
(November 18, 2021) Letter from Jacob Dawang, More Neighbours Toronto (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140173.pdf
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Andrei Korac (PH.New)
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Keith Marshall (PH.New)
(November 7, 2021) E-mail from Kensington Residents Association (PH.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-139905.pdf
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Sophie Paas-Lang (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Daniel Frank (PH.New)
(November 22, 2021) Letter from Adam DaSilva, Executive Vice President, Stafford (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140266.pdf
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Simon Tran (PH.New)
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Kevin Linger (PH.New)
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Barb Moore (PH.New)
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Allen George (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Nadia Todorova, Executive Director, Residential Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140356.pdf
(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Lauren Podmore (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Ene Underwood, Chief Executive Officer, Habitat for Humanity Greater Toronto Area (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140374.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Philip Pothen, Ontario Environment Program Manager, Environmental Defence (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140375.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Jeremy Alter, Vice President - Construction, The Goldman Group (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140384.pdf
(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140377.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Mike Riccardi, Vice-President, Construction, Fernbrook Homes (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140380.pdf
(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Vicki McGregor (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Debbie Briggs, Summerhill Residents Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140425.pdf
(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Andrew Dodds (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Alexandra Simpson (PH.New)
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Bryan Purcell, The Atmospheric Fund (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140430.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Letter from Judy Farvolden, University of Toronto Transportation Research Institute (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140431.pdf
(November 25, 2021) Letter from Daryl Chong, Greater Toronto Apartment Association (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140434.pdf
(November 25, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140438.pdf
(November 25, 2021) Letter from Michael Mestyan, Vice President, Development, Tridel Builders Inc. (PH.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/comm/communicationfile-140410.pdf
(November 25, 2021) E-mail from Paul Bishop (PH.New)

Communications (City Council)

(November 28, 2021) E-mail from Adrianna Ascalon (CC.Main)
(November 29, 2021) Letter from Suzanne Goldberg, Director of Public Policy - Canada, ChargePoint Canada Inc. (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142325.pdf
(December 1, 2021) E-mail from Kulotaman Paramanantharajah (CC.Main)
(December 3, 2021) E-mail from Jeff Mount (CC.Main)
(December 6, 2021) Letter from Gary Bensky, President, Wycliffe Homes (CC.Main)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142328.pdf
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Javed Nissar (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Jacob Givertz-Steel (CC.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) E-mail from Justin Bull (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Aditya Trivedi (CC.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Ke Xin (Crystal) Hu (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Jacob Dawang, More Neighbours Toronto (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142603.pdf
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Garnet Lollar (CC.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) Letter from Nadia Todorova, Executive Director, Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142615.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Sara O'Sullivan (CC.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Luke Bradley (CC.Supp)
(December 15, 2021) Letter from Peter Athanasopoulos, The Provincial Accessible Parking Task Force (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142829.pdf
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Wendy Murphy (CC.New)
(November 10, 2021) Submission from Peter Athanasopoulos, The Provincial Accessible Parking Task Force (CC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142841.pdf
(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Mark Stevenson (CC.New)

PH29.4 - Etobicoke Civic Centre - City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
Bills 977, 978, and 979 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and Zoning By-law 1088-2002 for the lands at 3755 Bloor Street West and the lands located south of Bloor Street West and west of Dundas Street west substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendments attached as Attachments 9 and 10 to the report (November 9, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 3755 Bloor Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 11 to the report (November 9, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4.  City Council request CreateTO to ensure a Community Benefits Agreement is in place for construction of the Etobicoke Civic centre.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee held a statutory public meeting on November 25, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 9, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The City of Toronto, in partnership with CreateTO, is proposing a new Etobicoke Civic Centre ("ECC") on City-owned lands located at the northeast corner of Dundas Street West and Kipling Avenue, municipally known as 3755 Bloor Street West. This report recommends approval of a City-initiated Zoning By-law Amendment to permit the new Etobicoke Civic Centre with municipal offices, market office space, an outdoor civic square, a community recreation centre, a medical clinic, a childcare centre, a café, a public art gallery, and a new Toronto Public Library district branch. The community recreation centre is proposed to have a gymnasium, aquatic centre, multi-purpose rooms, and fitness rooms.

 

The proposal is seeking to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code, as amended by Zoning By-law 1088-2002 and city-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013, to permit the building with heights varying from three storeys to 16 storeys and with a total gross floor area of 44,677 square metres. A total of 420 parking spaces managed by the Toronto Parking Authority ("TPA") are located within a two-level underground parking garage.

 

The recommended draft Zoning By-law Amendments are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan (2020) and the City's Official Plan.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 9, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 8 and 12 to 14 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Etobicoke Civic Centre - City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173085.pdf
Attachment 9 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and Zoning By-law 1088-2002 for the subject site
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173086.pdf
Attachment 10 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to Former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code and Zoning By-law 1088-2002 for Block 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173100.pdf
Attachment 11 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to City-Wide Zoning By-law 569-2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173101.pdf
(November 4, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-172907.pdf

PH29.5 - Implementing Tenants First: Authority to Enter Into a Municipal Capital Facilities Agreement for the Single-Family Homes being Transferred to the Non-Profit Housing Sector

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:  

 

1. City Council adopt the updated Municipal Housing Facility By-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (November 10, 2021) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and repeal Municipal Housing Facility By-law 1756-2019.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the City, a municipal housing facility agreement (the City's Contribution Agreement) with the housing providers described in Table 2 in the Financial Impact section of this report to secure affordable housing in accordance with the updated Municipal Capital Facilities By-Law, (by-law 1756-2019 as revised by Recommendation 1), in return for the exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Shelter Support and Housing Administration and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

 

3. City Council authorize an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes for the properties described in Attachment 2 to the report (November 10, 2021) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and periods of time described in Table 2 in the Financial Impact section this report, with the tax exemption being effective from the "Effective Date" of the City's Contribution Agreement.

 

4. City Council authorize the Controller to cancel or refund any taxes paid after the Effective Date of the City's Contribution Agreement.

 

5. City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of each By-law authorizing the municipal housing facility agreements to the Minister of Finance, and written notice of each By-law authorizing an exemption from taxation for municipal and school purposes to the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, and to the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, le Conseil scolaire Viamonde, and le Conseil scolaire catholique MonAvenir, as appropriate.

Origin

(November 10, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

Since 2016, through the Tenants First project, City Council has approved a series of recommendations to transfer a number of Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) units to the non-profit sector in order to narrow TCHC's direct operational responsibility for their portfolio of single-family homes.

 

In October 2020, City Council directed the TCHC Board of Directors to negotiate and transfer ownership and operations of the single-family homes portfolio to two successful proponents selected through a joint City-TCHC Request for Proposals (RFP) process: Circle Community Land Trust (CCLT) and Neighbourhood Land Trust (NLT). Prior to TCHC entering into negotiations, the City completed an extensive due diligence process with the proponents, including reviewing the financial modeling and City funding contributions for the portfolio.  

 

To support the financial viability of these transfers and to preserve this important stock of affordable housing, it is recommended the City offer a property tax exemption for the units being transferred to CCLT and the NLT. The recommended property tax exemption requires that the Municipal Capital Facilities By-Law be updated so this portfolio of single-family homes is eligible as a municipal housing project facility.   

 

This report seeks Council authority to enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with the non-profit housing providers for the purpose of providing the property tax exemption as well as other site-specific exemptions. This request is in alignment with the other elements of the by-law, and with the City's Community Housing Partnership Renewal Program. In exchange for the property tax exemptions, the monthly occupancy costs will be set at or below 90% of Average Market Rents. The majority of the units are currently and will remain deeply affordable through rent supplements. The property tax exemption will support the successful transfer of these homes to the non-profit housing sector.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2021) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Implementing Tenants First: Authority to Enter Into a Municipal Capital Facilities Agreement for the Single-Family Homes being Transferred to the Non-Profit Housing Sector
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173137.pdf
Attachment 1- Updated Municipal Capital Facilities By-Law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173138.pdf
Attachment 2 - List of TCHC's Single Family Home Properties for Transfer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173139.pdf

PH29.7 - Lawrence Heights Revitalization - Phases 2 and 3 Interim Status and Budget Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Confidential Attachment - Contains financial information, supplied in confidence to the City of Toronto, which, if disclosed, could reasonably be expected to prejudice significantly the competitive position or interfere significantly with the contractual or other negotiations of a person, group of persons, or organization and contains information about a plan to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct that the financial information, supplied in confidence to the City of Toronto in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 10, 2021) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, remain confidential in its entirety until such time as Toronto Community Housing Corporation agrees that the confidential information may be disclosed to the public.

 

2. City Council direct that the information about a plan to be applied to any negotiations carried on or to be carried on by or on behalf of the City of Toronto contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 10, 2021) from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat that pertains to City interest be disclosed to the public once Toronto Community Housing Corporation has selected a development partner and negotiations related to Phases 2 and 3 conclude.

 

3. City Council request that the General Managers of Transportation Services, Toronto Water, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and Children's Services include the updated public infrastructure cost estimates for Phase 1, 2 and 3, as outlined in Confidential Attachment 1, in the 2022-2031 Capital Budget and Plan and through future budget processes for approval, subject to consideration of all other City priorities and available funding.

 

4. City Council request the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the appropriate City Divisions, the Chief Executive Officer, CreateTO and the President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, to report to City Council by the third quarter of 2022 with the outcome of the TCHC procurement process and a recommended development partner, refined cost estimates and an update on funding opportunities to support the revitalization project.

 

5. City Council direct the General Managers of Toronto Water, Transportation Services, Children's Services, and Parks, Forestry and Recreation and request the Board of Directors of Toronto Community Housing Corporation to work together to advance the development of the Community Recreation Centre, to meet the Federal government's requirements and deadline for project completion, should the City receive federal funding to build the new Community Recreation Centre in Lawrence Heights.

 

6. City Council direct the General Managers of Toronto Water and Transportation Services to submit capital budgets that allow for a portion of the new road as part of Phase 2 to be constructed to support the construction of the community recreation centre.

 

7. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to expedite design of the Lawrence Heights Community Recreation Centre with Children's Services, including moving forward with their procurement process and prioritizing completion of the new community recreation centre project by March 2026 to comply with the requirements of the federal government's Green and Inclusive Community Building Fund.

 

8. City Council request a full Community Benefits Agreement for the construction of Phases 2 and 3 of Lawrence Heights and that the plan be reported to the Planning and Housing Committee prior to finalizing.

 

9. City Council reaffirm with the new federal Minister of Infrastructure and Communities, the Honourable Dominic LeBlanc and local Member of the Parliament for Eglinton-Lawrence and Minister of Public Safety, the Honourable Marco Mendicino the City's commitment to expedite the building of the new Lawrence Heights Community Recreation Centre in compliance with the March 2026 timeline, contingent on the City securing the Green and Inclusive Community Building funding to complete this crucially needed project.

Origin

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat

Summary

On October 27, 2020, City Council adopted Item PH17.8, "Lawrence Heights Phases 2 and 3 - Initial Development Proposal". The Initial Development Proposal ("IDP") was provided to Council for approval in accordance with the new approval framework for Toronto Community Housing Corporation ("TCHC") revitalization projects. This approvals process framework was approved by Council in July 2019 and aims to provide the City with earlier insight into TCHC revitalization projects and ensure that they support wider city-building priorities.

 

The IDP provided an outline of the project concept for Phases 2 and 3 of the Lawrence Heights revitalization project reflecting the Lawrence Allen Secondary Plan approved by City Council in November 2011. It also summarized challenges and opportunities for achieving city-building objectives, provided preliminary public infrastructure cost estimates, provided details of stakeholder engagement activities, and outlined a series of next steps to advance the project.

 

This report provides Council with an update on the status of the project, and recommends approval of updated public infrastructure cost estimates so that these items can be included in divisional 2022 capital budget submissions. At the time the IDP was approved by Council in October 2020, the full financial implications were not reflected in the report. The preliminary public infrastructure cost estimates included were escalated from the City’s 2011 Lawrence Heights Financial Strategy which supported the 2011 Lawrence Allen Secondary Plan ("Secondary Plan"). The Secondary Plan was developed based on years of consultation with City Staff, residents and stakeholders and is the foundation for the first phase of revitalization at Lawrence Heights. To accommodate cost escalations from 2020 to 2021, the 2020 IDP costs have since been reviewed and escalated again to 2021 dollars (outlined in Confidential Attachment 1). These revised cost estimates have been reviewed by the respective City divisions and, subject to Council's approval of this report, will be included in divisional 2022 capital budget submissions for consideration through the budget process. Phase 1 cost escalations for the previously approved 2011 Financial Strategy for Lawrence Heights will also be included in 2022 capital budget submissions. Further refined and detailed budgets for Phases 2 and 3 of the revitalization project will be developed once a development partner has been selected and the detailed design of the project is finalized.

 

In additional to budget updates, this report provides Council with details of work done to-date by TCHC, City and CreateTO staff to: explore adding additional affordable housing onsite; secure third-party funding opportunities, advance the partner procurement process to select a development partner; create the community hub, and implement audit recommendations.

 

City Council's approval of the recommendations in this report would allow TCHC to proceed with a public RFP process in early 2022 to identify a development partner for Phases 2 and 3 of the Lawrence Heights revitalization project. Following the RFP process, and in line with the approvals process framework, City staff, in consultation with TCHC, will report back to Council in 2022 with details of the TCHC recommended development partner, refined budgets based on proposals received and an update on third-party funding opportunities. Once a development partner has been selected, a master planning process to advance phases 2 and 3 will commence in collaboration with TCHC and the developer, City and CreateTO staff, TCHC tenants and the local community.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 10, 2021) Report from the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat on Lawrence Heights Revitalization - Phases 2 and 3 Interim Status and Budget Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173167.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Updated Cost Estimates and Cash Flow Projection

Speakers

Kira Heineck, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (TAEH)
Councillor Mike Colle

PH29.12 - Downsview Secondary Plan Update - Authorization to Enter into Agreements for Resourcing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services to enter into any necessary agreements with Canada Lands Company Ltd. and Northcrest Developments to secure resources to the City for the update to the Downsview Secondary Plan, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(November 9, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report builds on the direction from City Council to update the Downsview Secondary Plan following the adoption of Site and Area Specific Policy 596 ("SASP 596") on approximately half of the lands covered by the Secondary Plan. Canada Lands Company Ltd and Northcrest Developments, the owners of the lands covered by SASP 596, have agreed to provide resources towards the updating of the Downsview Secondary Plan for up to two years. This report requests authorization for the City to enter into the necessary agreements to facilitate the resourcing.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 9, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Downsview Secondary Plan Update - Authorization to Enter into Agreements for Resourcing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173093.pdf

PH29.15 - 2021 Toronto Heritage Grant Award

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the grant award for the 2021 Toronto Heritage Grant Program in the amount of $58,800.00 for the Audley Court Apartments located at 68 Kendal Avenue, to assist the property owner in funding the scope of conservation work generally described in the report (November 5, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council direct that the use of the grant award outlined in Recommendation 1 above, be limited to only the conservation work approved by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and that the issuing of the grant award be subject to the grant recipient satisfying all conditions as set out in the Letter of Understanding between the City and the grant recipient, Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation Number 704.

Origin

(November 5, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends the approval of a grant totalling $58,800.00 for the restoration of the historic balconies of the Audley Court Apartments located at 68 Kendal Avenue under the Toronto Heritage Grant Program. Grants shall be awarded for up to, but not more than, half of the eligible costs for the restoration project. 

 

The Toronto Heritage Grant Program provides matching grant funds for eligible heritage conservation work of residential properties or tax exempt properties in the City of Toronto designated under Part IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Applicants may receive a grant once every five years for up to 50% of the cost of eligible conservation work. Owners of non-house form buildings and any tax exempt properties including house-form buildings may be eligible for a grant equivalent to 50% of the cost of eligible conservation work, with no maximum limit.

 

The Toronto Heritage Grant Program is administered by Heritage Planning (HP), City Planning.  The City Planning 2021 Operating Budget has a remaining balance of $58,800.00 to be allocated before the end of the fiscal year.

 

The Audley Court Apartment located in the Annex neighbourhood originally constructed in 1912, is an example of this early period of apartment architecture within Toronto. Designed by local architect Joseph Hunt Stanford, it displays many characteristics of the Edwardian Classical Revival style. In the 1980s the building was converted into a condominium with 8 units. 

 

The Audley Court Apartments is listed on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.  The property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the OHA under all three categories of design and physical, historical associative, and contextual value.

 

The application from the Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 704, owners of the Audley Court Apartments, is recommended for a grant award and that the issuing of the grant award be subject to the grant recipient satisfying all conditions as set out in the Letter of Understanding between the City and the grant recipient including the property being designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 5, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 2021 Toronto Heritage Grant Award
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173080.pdf

15a - 2021 Toronto Heritage Grant Award

Origin
(November 17, 2021) Letter from Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

At its meeting on November 17, 2021, the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB28.7, a report (November 5, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 2021 Toronto Heritage Grant Award.

 

This report recommends the approval of a grant totalling $58,800.00 for the restoration of the historic balconies of the Audley Court Apartments located at 68 Kendal Avenue under the Toronto Heritage Grant Program. Grants shall be awarded for up to, but not more than, half of the eligible costs for the restoration project. 

 

The Toronto Heritage Grant Program provides matching grant funds for eligible heritage conservation work of residential properties or tax exempt properties in the City of Toronto designated under Part IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). Applicants may receive a grant once every five years for up to 50 percent of the cost of eligible conservation work. Owners of non-house form buildings and any tax exempt properties including house-form buildings may be eligible for a grant equivalent to 50 percent of the cost of eligible conservation work, with no maximum limit.

 

The Toronto Heritage Grant Program is administered by Heritage Planning (HP), City Planning.  The City Planning 2021 Operating Budget has a remaining balance of $58,800.00 to be allocated before the end of the fiscal year.

 

The Audley Court Apartment located in the Annex neighbourhood originally constructed in 1912, is an example of this early period of apartment architecture within Toronto. Designed by local architect Joseph Hunt Stanford, it displays many characteristics of the Edwardian Classical Revival style. In the 1980s the building was converted into a condominium with 8 units. 

 

The Audley Court Apartments is listed on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register.  The property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the OHA under all three categories of design and physical, historical associative, and contextual value.

 

The application from the Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 704, owners of the Audley Court Apartments, is recommended for a grant award and that the issuing of the grant award be subject to the grant recipient satisfying all conditions as set out in the Letter of Understanding between the City and the grant recipient including the property being designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on 2021 Toronto Heritage Grant Award
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173675.pdf

PH29.16 - 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West - Notice of Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PH29.16b with recommendations).

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 141 Bathurst Street (entrance address 581 Richmond Street West), under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 141 Bathurst Street, (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (October 27, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 579 Richmond Street West under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 579 Richmond Street West (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (October 27, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

3. If there are no objections to the designations, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Housing Committee:

 

1. Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report directly to the December 15 and 16, 2021 meeting of City Council on the following:

 

a. A review of the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value and attributes for the property located at 141 Bathurst Street, including the description of the property and ownership of the adjacent laneway; and,

 

b. A review of the Statement of Cultural Heritage Value and attributes for the property located at 579 Richmond Street, especially the capped chimney.

Origin

(October 27, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the listed heritage properties at 141 Bathurst Street, entrance address 581 Richmond Street West, and 579 Richmond Street West, under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The properties at 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West are located on

the south-east corner of the intersection of Bathurst Street and Richmond Street West.  The property at 141 Bathurst Street contains a two-storey, buff brick-clad factory building constructed in 1900 for E. C. Walker & Sons, Ltd., hat manufacturers, with a rare set-back from the adjacent streets within a rear yard. 579 Richmond Street West contains a four-and-a-half storey, red brick-clad factory building, constructed in 1913 for the Independent Cloak Co. according to the designs of the architect Isadore Feldman. These two early 20th-century factories exhibit an Industrial Classical style and, with their finely detailed and proportioned brick facades, contribute to the distinctive heritage character of the King-Spadina neighbourhood, which is grounded in its early-mid 20th-century transformation as the city's primary manufacturing hub and its fashion district identity. 

 

The properties at 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West were listed on the City's Heritage Register in 2017 and both properties were identified as contributing properties within the proposed King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District, adopted by City Council in 2017 and currently under appeal. Following additional research and evaluation under Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation, it has been determined that the properties at 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West merit designation under Part IV Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their design, associative and contextual value.

 

An application has been submitted to amend the zoning by-law to permit the redevelopment of the properties at 141-161 Bathurst Street and 579-591 Richmond Street West with a 12-storey non-residential building containing retail uses at the ground level and office uses above. This development proposal comprises Phase 1 of a larger development which also includes the sites at 555 Richmond Street West and 550 Adelaide Street West (Phase 2). The phase 1 and phase 2 development proposals are being reviewed concurrently.

 

The heritage buildings at 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West are proposed to be conserved while two listed house-form buildings at 159 and 161 Bathurst Street are proposed to be demolished.  Staff's further research and additional analysis determined these listed house-form buildings at 159 and 161 Bathurst Street do not meet the criteria under O. Reg. 9/06 required to merit designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.  

 

In June 2019, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 (Bill 108) received Royal Assent. Schedule 11 of this Act included amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). The Bill 108 Amendments to the OHA came into force on July 1, 2021, which included a shift in Part IV designations related to certain Planning Act applications. Section 29(1.2) of the OHA now restricts City Council's ability to give notice of its intention to designate a property under the OHA to within 90 days after the City Clerk gives notice of a complete application.

 

The City Clerk issued a notice of complete application for the redevelopment of the properties on September 24, 2021. City Council must make a decision and issue a Notice of Intention to Designate the subject properties no later than December 23, 2021.

 

Designation enables City Council to review proposed alterations, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition. 

Background Information (Committee)

(October 27, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 4 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West - Notice of Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173077.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 14, 2021) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West - Notice of Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act (PH29.16b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174416.pdf

16a - 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West - Notice of Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Origin
(November 17, 2021) Letter from Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

At its meeting on November 17, 2021 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB28.3, a report (March 5, 2021) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning on 41 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West - Notice of Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the listed heritage properties at 141 Bathurst Street, entrance address 581 Richmond Street West, and 579 Richmond Street West, under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The properties at 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West are located on

the south-east corner of the intersection of Bathurst Street and Richmond Street West.  The property at 141 Bathurst Street contains a two-storey, buff brick-clad factory building constructed in 1900 for E. C. Walker & Sons, Ltd., hat manufacturers, with a rare set-back from the adjacent streets within a rear yard. 579 Richmond Street West contains a four-and-a-half storey, red brick-clad factory building, constructed in 1913 for the Independent Cloak Co. according to the designs of the architect Isadore Feldman. These two early 20th-century factories exhibit an Industrial Classical style and, with their finely detailed and proportioned brick facades, contribute to the distinctive heritage character of the King-Spadina neighbourhood, which is grounded in its early-mid 20th-century transformation as the city's primary manufacturing hub and its fashion district identity. 

 

The properties at 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West were listed on the City's Heritage Register in 2017 and both properties were identified as contributing properties within the proposed King-Spadina Heritage Conservation District, adopted by City Council in 2017 and currently under appeal. Following additional research and evaluation under Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation, it has been determined that the properties at 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West merit designation under Part IV Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their design, associative and contextual value.

 

An application has been submitted to amend the zoning by-law to permit the redevelopment of the properties at 141-161 Bathurst Street and 579-591 Richmond Street West with a 12-storey non-residential building containing retail uses at the ground level and office uses above. This development proposal comprises Phase 1 of a larger development which also includes the sites at 555 Richmond Street West and 550 Adelaide Street West (Phase 2). The phase 1 and phase 2 development proposals are being reviewed concurrently.

 

The heritage buildings at 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West are proposed to be conserved while two listed house-form buildings at 159 and 161 Bathurst Street are proposed to be demolished.  Staff's further research and additional analysis determined these listed house-form buildings at 159 and 161 Bathurst Street do not meet the criteria under O. Reg. 9/06 required to merit designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.  

 

In June 2019, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 (Bill 108) received Royal Assent. Schedule 11 of this Act included amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). The Bill 108 Amendments to the OHA came into force on July 1, 2021, which included a shift in Part IV designations related to certain Planning Act applications. Section 29(1.2) of the OHA now restricts City Council's ability to give notice of its intention to designate a property under the OHA to within 90 days after the City Clerk gives notice of a complete application.

 

The City Clerk issued a notice of complete application for the redevelopment of the properties on September 24, 2021. City Council must make a decision and issue a Notice of Intention to Designate the subject properties no later than December 23, 2021.

 

Designation enables City Council to review proposed alterations, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on 141 Bathurst Street and 579 Richmond Street West - Notice of Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173654.pdf

PH29.17 - 2365 Bayview Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at 2365 Bayview Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance; 2365 Bayview Avenue (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (November 9, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

 

2.  If there are no objections to the designation, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Origin

(November 9, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the listed heritage property at 2365 Bayview Avenue (the Frank P. Wood estate) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The property at 2365 Bayview Avenue, containing the Frank P. Wood estate now known as the Crescent School, is part of a sequence of grand estates, constructed between 1920 and1940, on the forested ravine above the western branch of the Don River, in the Bridle Path-Sunnybrook-York Mills neighbourhood. The property was originally listed on the North York Inventory of Heritage Properties in 1998 and following municipal amalgamation included on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in 2006.

 

On March 6, 2020, a Site Plan Control application was submitted to the City to permit a two-storey addition which will connect to the north side-wall of the manor house's service wing. Its construction will result in the demolition of the remnant of the second garage and the infilling of the remaining portion of the service court. No alterations are proposed to the manor house. Following City staff's additional research and evaluation under Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation, it has been determined that the property at 2365 Bayview Avenue merits designation under Part IV Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its design, associative and contextual value.

 

A report, January 25, 2021, from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning recommending the intention to designate the property at 2365 Bayview Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act was referred back to staff at the April 20, 2021 meeting of the North York Community Council for further consultation with the property owner.  Prior to Community Council's decision, the Toronto Preservation Board adopted the Senior Manager's January 25, 2021 report on February 17, 2021.

 

As a result of consultation with the property owner in the recent months, staff revised the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) - 2365 Bayview Avenue (Attachment 3) to include additions under the description of heritage attributes to provide further clarification with regard to two attributes of the Frank P. Wood estate, now the Crescent School. The revisions also include a correction under the Description section indicating that the log cabin was designed by the architect Gordon Gibson.

 

The designation of the Frank P. Wood estate (now known as the Crescent School) at 2365 Bayview Avenue would identify all of the property's cultural heritage values and heritage attributes which shall be conserved.  Designation enables City Council to review proposed alterations for the property, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition. 

 

In June 2019, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 (Bill 108) received Royal Assent. Schedule 11 of this Act included amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). The Bill 108 Amendments to the OHA came into force on July 1, 2021, which included a shift in Part IV designations related to certain Planning Act applications. Section 29(1.2) of the OHA now restricts City Council's ability to give notice of its intention to designate a property under the OHA to within 90 days after the City Clerk gives notice of a complete application. The application currently under review was deemed complete prior to the new legislation coming into force.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 9, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 2365 Bayview Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173133.pdf

17a - 2365 Bayview Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Origin
(November 17, 2021) Letter from Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

At its meeting on November 17, 2021 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB28.5, a report (November 5, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 2365 Bayview Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the listed heritage property at 2365 Bayview Avenue (the Frank P. Wood estate) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The property at 2365 Bayview Avenue, containing the Frank P. Wood estate now known as the Crescent School, is part of a sequence of grand estates, constructed between 1920 and1940, on the forested ravine above the western branch of the Don River, in the Bridle Path-Sunnybrook-York Mills neighbourhood. The property was originally listed on the North York Inventory of Heritage Properties in 1998 and following municipal amalgamation included on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in 2006.

 

On March 6, 2020, a Site Plan Control application was submitted to the City to permit a two-storey addition which will connect to the north side-wall of the manor house's service wing. Its construction will result in the demolition of the remnant of the second garage and the infilling of the remaining portion of the service court. No alterations are proposed to the manor house. Following City staff's additional research and evaluation under Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation, it has been determined that the property at 2365 Bayview Avenue merits designation under Part IV Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its design, associative and contextual value.

 

A report, January 25, 2021, from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning recommending the intention to designate the property at 2365 Bayview Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act was referred back to staff at the April 20, 2021 meeting of the North York Community Council for further consultation with the property owner.  Prior to Community Council's decision, the Toronto Preservation Board adopted the Senior Manager's January 25, 2021 report on February 17, 2021.

 

As a result of consultation with the property owner in the recent months, staff revised the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) - 2365 Bayview Avenue (Attachment 3) to include additions under the description of heritage attributes to provide further clarification with regard to two attributes of the Frank P. Wood estate, now the Crescent School. The revisions also include a correction under the Description section indicating that the log cabin was designed by the architect Gordon Gibson.

 

The designation of the Frank P. Wood estate (now known as the Crescent School) at 2365 Bayview Avenue would identify all of the property's cultural heritage values and heritage attributes which shall be conserved.  Designation enables City Council to review proposed alterations for the property, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition. 

 

In June 2019, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 (Bill 108) received Royal Assent. Schedule 11 of this Act included amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). The Bill 108 Amendments to the OHA came into force on July 1, 2021, which included a shift in Part IV designations related certain Planning Act applications. Section 29(1.2) of the OHA now restricts City Council's ability to give notice of its intention to designate a property under the OHA to within 90 days after the City Clerk gives notice of a complete application. The application currently under review was deemed complete prior to the new legislation coming into force.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on 2365 Bayview Avenue - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173676.pdf

PH29.18 - 516 and 526 Yonge Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at 516 Yonge Street (including the entrance address at 514 Yonge Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of  the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 516 Yonge Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (October 27, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at 526 Yonge Street (including the entrance addresses at 528 Yonge Street and 7 Breadalbane Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 526 Yonge Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (October 27, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

3.  If there are no objections to the designation, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Origin

(October 27, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the listed heritage property at 516 Yonge Street (including the entrance address at 514 Yonge Street) for its design and contextual values and the also listed 526 Yonge Street (including the entrance addresses at 528 Yonge Street and 7 Breadalbane Street) for its design, associative and contextual values under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

Originally constructed circa 1876 and renovated in 1924, the property at 516 Yonge Street represents the fine-grained mixed-use/commercial building type that emerged along Yonge Street, north of College Street, in the late 19th century and persisted until the mid-20th century. Although altered, the property is one of the earliest surviving buildings on the block between Grosvenor and Breadalbane Streets, and retains its original scale, form, and massing as a 2-1/2-storey building with a mansard roof, along with architectural details from the late-19th and early 20th centuries.

 

Constructed circa 1881 to the designs of the significant Toronto architectural firm of McCaw & Lennox, the property at 526 Yonge Street anchors the southwest corner of Yonge and Breadalbane Streets and is a representative example of the Second Empire architectural style that was popular in Toronto in the late-19th century. The property retains its original scale, form, and massing as a 2-1/2-storey building with a 2-storey rear wing, and its Second Empire style is reflected in many of its extant original design features.

 

On October 16, 2020, an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application was made for 510-528 Yonge Street and 7 Breadalbane Street, which includes three properties currently listed on the Heritage Register - 516 Yonge Street, 522 Yonge Street, and 526 Yonge Street - and proposes to retain and incorporate portions of the buildings at 516 Yonge Street and 526 Yonge Street. On October 1, 2021, City Council adopted Item TE27.8, directing the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment appeals for the lands at 510-528 Yonge Street and 7 Breadalbane Street, and to continue discussions with the owner in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.

 

Designation enables City Council to review proposed alterations or demolitions to the properties and enforce heritage property standards and maintenance.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 27, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 4 form the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 516 and 526 Yonge Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173081.pdf

18a - 516 and 526 Yonge Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Origin
(November 17, 2021) Letter from Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

At its meeting on November 17, 2021 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB28.4, a report (November 5, 2021) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning on 516 and 526 Yonge Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the listed heritage property at 516 Yonge Street (including the entrance address at 514 Yonge Street) for its design and contextual values and the also listed 526 Yonge Street (including the entrance addresses at 528 Yonge Street and 7 Breadalbane Street) for its design, associative and contextual values under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

Originally constructed circa 1876 and renovated in 1924, the property at 516 Yonge Street represents the fine-grained mixed-use/commercial building type that emerged along Yonge Street, north of College Street, in the late 19th century and persisted until the mid-20th century. Although altered, the property is one of the earliest surviving buildings on the block between Grosvenor and Breadalbane Streets, and retains its original scale, form, and massing as a 2-1/2-storey building with a mansard roof, along with architectural details from the late-19th and early 20th centuries.

 

Constructed circa 1881 to the designs of the significant Toronto architectural firm of McCaw & Lennox, the property at 526 Yonge Street anchors the southwest corner of Yonge and Breadalbane Streets and is a representative example of the Second Empire architectural style that was popular in Toronto in the late-19th century. The property retains its original scale, form, and massing as a 2-1/2-storey building with a 2-storey rear wing, and its Second Empire style is reflected in many of its extant original design features.

 

On October 16, 2020, an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application was made for 510-528 Yonge Street and 7 Breadalbane Street, which includes three properties currently listed on the Heritage Register - 516 Yonge Street, 522 Yonge Street, and 526 Yonge Street - and proposes to retain and incorporate portions of the buildings at 516 Yonge Street and 526 Yonge Street. On October 1, 2021, City Council adopted Item TE27.8, directing the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment appeals for the lands at 510-528 Yonge Street and 7 Breadalbane Street, and to continue discussions with the owner in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.

 

Designation enables City Council to review proposed alterations or demolitions to the properties and enforce heritage property standards and maintenance.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on 516 and 526 Yonge Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173653.pdf

PH29.20 - Bridging the Gap - Increasing Rent Geared to Income Units on Regent Park Phase 3

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Housing Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize that up to 55 additional new rent-geared-to-income and new affordable rental units to be constructed in Phase 3 of the Regent Park Revitalization be eligible for waivers for building permit and development charge exemptions.

 

2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to negotiate and enter into, on behalf of the City, a municipal housing project facility agreement (the "Contribution Agreement") with Toronto Community Housing Corporation for the development of the new rent-geared-to-income and new affordable housing to be constructed on the lands known as 175 Oak Street, to secure the financial assistance being provided and to set out the terms of the operation of the new affordable rental units, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

Origin

(November 25, 2021) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Summary

In October 2014, waivers for planning application, building permit, parkland dedication fees and development charge exemptions were approved for up to 614 units of rent-geared-to-income and new affordable rental housing in Phase 3 of the Regent Park Revitalization. Construction and occupancy is complete for three buildings in Phase 3 at 110 River Street, 25 Wyatt Street and 150 River Street. Now the last building in Phase 3, 175 Oak Street is proceeding to construction and is expecting a building permit in January 2022. With the addition of this building the total units to be built in Phase 3 will total 669 units not the projected total of 614 units. The unit count has increased due to the addition of new affordable units within what were rent-geared-to-income replacement housing buildings and the redesign of buildings as a result of the planning process.

 

To enable Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) to not have to pay development charges and building permit fees in January 2022 for 175 Oak Street a new exemption approval by Council is required.

 

This motion recommends the provision of an estimated $3,059,879 in City incentives to TCHC to the support the development of an additional 55 units of rent-geared-to-income and affordable rental housing in Phase 3.This increase in units from 614 to 669 units will result in increased exemption of $110,627 for building permit fees and $2,949,252 for development charges. As this phase has completed the planning approval stage all applicable planning fees and parkland dedication fees have already been waived.

 

The financial incentives recommended for Council approval (which reflect the outstanding fees and charges for the 55 additional units) are summarized in Table 1 below:

 

Table 1 City Financial Incentives

 

Affordable

Rental Home

Affordability

Period

Estimated

Development

Charges

Estimated

Building Permit Fees

Estimated Total Value of Incentives

55

Perpetuity

$2,949,252

$110,627

$3,059,879

 

Calculated using November 2021 rates 

Background Information (Committee)

(November 25, 2021) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam on Bridging the Gap - increasing RGI units on Regent Park Phase 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ph/bgrd/backgroundfile-173800.pdf

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 28

EY28.1 - 5415-5481, 5485 and 5487 Dundas Street West and 15 and 25 Shorncliffe Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code, as amended by Site-Specific By-laws 1088-2002, 769-2016 and 1100-2016, for the lands at 5415-5481, 5485 and 5487 Dundas Street West and 15 and 25 Shorncliffe Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 7 to the report (October 30, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3. City Council require the owner to submit a Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, demonstrating there is sufficient capacity in the sanitary sewer system and all required upgrades and improvements have been financially secured through a Subdivision Agreement in order to lift the Holding Symbol from the site.

 

4. City Council direct that any future Site Plan Control applications for this development be reviewed in the context of the Site-Specific Urban Design Guidelines dated December 2020, included as Attachment 9 to the report (October 30, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to: 

 

a. Provide confirmation from the owner's vibration consultant that the analysis conducted in 2011 is still valid. The proponent shall also undertake vibration measurements near the southwest corner of the site to obtain a representative picture of vibration impact form the rail corridor to the satisfaction of Metrolinx;

 

b. Provide a Noise Assessment that reflects Metrolinx's current forecast information. The assessment shall contemplate rail traffic on the Canpa subdivision. The owner shall undertake noise measurements near the southwest corner of the site to obtain a representative picture of noise impact from the rail corridor all of which is to the satisfaction of Metrolinx; and

 

c. The owner's servicing consultant shall confirm that the proposed overland flows will not adversely impact Metrolinx lands to the satisfaction of Metrolinx.

 

6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council authorize amendment to the original Section 37 Agreement (AT4381547) entered into by the owner with the City pursuant to By-law 769-2016, as may be required to extend the timing of conveyance of the "easterly parkland" associated with Phase 1 to prior to above-grade building permit for the Phase 2 building, on terms set out in the amending agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

7. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning and the City Solicitor, as follows:

 

a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

1. Prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall make a cash contribution to the City in the amount of $1,600,000.00 by certified cheque payable to the Treasurer, City of Toronto, to be allocated at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, toward capital improvements for one or more of the following capital improvements within the Ward:

 

a. Local traffic calming projects;

 

b. Local park improvements, including the new Etobicoke Centre public park;

 

c. New child care and community recreational centre proposed to be included in the new Etobicoke Civic Centre; and

 

d. Local non-profit child care facilities.

 

e. Streetscape improvements in local area.

 

2. Prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit within any phase of the development, the owner shall make cash contributions to the City by certified cheque payable to the Treasurer, City of Toronto in the following amounts:

 

a. $625,000.00 as originally secured pursuant to By-law 769-2016; and

 

b. $250,000.00 as originally secured pursuant to By-law 1100-2016; which amounts shall be allocated at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, toward one or both of the capital needs for the Etobicoke Centre to be located on the former Westwood Theatre lands and local parkland improvements within the Ward.

 

3. The cash amount identified above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated as follows:

 

a. indexing of the contribution referred to in Recommendation 7.a.1 above shall be calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement required by this by-law to the date of payment;

 

b. Indexing of the contribution referred to in Recommendation 7.a.2.a. above shall be calculated from July 11, 2016 to the date of payment; and

 

c. Indexing of the contribution referred to in Recommendation 7.a.2.b. above shall be calculated from November 2, 2016 to the date of payment.

 

4. In the event the cash contribution referred to in Recommendation 7.a.1 and 7.a.2 above have not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this by-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purposes are identified in the Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.

 

b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:

 

1. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for all or any portion of a building in Phase 2, or on such later date on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the owner shall convey to the City, pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, the on-site parkland dedication identified as "Public Park A" on Schedule 'B' of the Attachment 7, having a minimum size of 1,569.34 m2 located along Dundas Street West and east of the future north-south public road, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in accordance with the terms set out in the Section 37 Agreement.

 

2. Prior to the issuance of an above grade building permit for all or any portion of  a building in Phase 6, or such later date on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the owner shall convey to the City, pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, the on-site parkland dedication identified as "Public Park B" on Schedule 'B' of Attachment 7, having a minimum size of 2575.12 m2 located along Dundas Street West and west of the future north-south public road, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and in accordance with the terms set out in the Section 37 Agreement.

 

3. The owner shall transfer the parkland requirements to the City free and clear, above and below grade, of all easements, encumbrances, and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on terms set out in the Section 37 Agreement, including provision for  encumbrances of tiebacks, where such encumbrance is deemed acceptable by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor and is subject to compensation payable to the City, in an amount determined by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management.

 

4. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for all or any portion of a building within Phase 2, in connection with "Public Park A", and Phase 6, in connection with "Public Park B", the owner shall submit a cost estimate and necessary plans/drawings of the base park improvements for the respective park, together with financial security on terms set out in the Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation. The submissions for base park improvements for "Public Park A" shall include, and the owner shall be responsible for, any walkways determined to be required and co-ordinated with adjacent parkland to the east associated with Phase 1 pursuant to By-law 769-2016.  No credit will be given towards the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for costs associated with base park improvements.

 

5. Prior to the earlier of first residential occupancy and first condominium registration of all or any portion of a building within Phase 2 , the owner shall complete the base park improvements for "Public Park A" to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, or such later date in the sole discretion of and on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation.

  

6. Prior to the earlier of the first residential occupancy and first condominium registration of all or any portion of a building within Phase 6, the owner shall complete base park improvements for "Public Park B" to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, or such later date in the sole discretion of and on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation.

 

7. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for all or any portion of a building within Phase 2 in connection with "Public Park A" and all or any portion of a building within Phase 6, in connection with "Public Park B", if the owner agrees to design and construct the above-base park improvements for a development charge credit approved by City Council against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for either the "Public Park A" or "Public Park B" shown on Schedule 'B' of Attachment 7, the owner shall submit a cost estimate and necessary working drawings, specifications and plans together with financial security on terms set out in the Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

8. Prior to the earlier of first residential occupancy and first condominium registration of all or any portion of a building within Phase 2, the owner shall complete the above-base park improvements, if any, undertaken for "Public Park A" to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, or such later date in the sole discretion of and on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

9. Prior to the earlier of the first residential occupancy and first condominium registration of all or any portion of a building within Phase 6, the owner shall complete the above-base park improvements, if any, undertaken for "Public Park B" to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, or such later date in the sole discretion of and on terms satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

10. The owner shall, at its own expense, design, construct and thereafter maintain the  Privately-Owned Publicly-Accessible Space ("POPS") areas in the locations illustrated on Schedule 'B' of Attachment 7 as "POPS A" having a minimum area of 711.7 m2 located between Building 2 and Building 3 and "POPS B" having a minimum area of 460.5 square meters located between Building 6 and "Public Park B", with the specific location, configuration and design to be determined and secured in the context of site plan approval to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

11. Prior to site plan approval for Phase 3 in connection with "POPS A" and prior to site plan approval for Phase 6 in connection with "POPS B", the owner shall prepare all documents, including a reference plan, and convey to the City, on terms set out in the Section 37 Agreement, an access easement, including support rights as applicable, for public use of the "POPS A" and "POPS B" to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor. The public access easements shall be conveyed to the City for nominal consideration, free and clear of all physical and title encumbrances at no cost to the City. The owner shall operate, maintain and repair the POPS spaces and install and maintain at its own expense approved signage identifying the POPS for public use.

 

12. Prior to the earlier of first residential or non-residential use occupancy and first condominium registration of all or any portion of a building within Phase 3, with respect to POPS "A" and of all or any portion of a building within Phase 6, with respect to POPS "B", the owner shall complete the construction of respective POPS to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or such later date in the sole discretion of  and on terms satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 

 

13. The owner shall construct Phase 2, Phase 3, Phase 4 and Phase  6 shown on Schedule 'B' of Attachment 7 in the order in which they are numbered. The order of construction may be altered at the discretion of the Chief Planner at the request of the owner provided that Phase 2 is first to proceed.

 

14. Prior to Site Plan Approval or the issuance of any Building Permit for any portion of the site, the owner shall transfer to the City the fee simple interest under those lands identified as the Transit Reserve and related rights of support in favour of the City in contemplation of the extension of the Toronto Transit Commission's Bloor-Danforth subway line to the satisfaction of the Toronto Transit Commission.

 

15. The owner shall prepare all documents, including a reference plan, and convey to the City for nominal consideration, free and clear of physical and title encumbrances and at no cost to the City, a 3.44-metre wide road widening along the northerly portion Shorncliffe Road in the context of site plan approval of the building within Phase 6.

 

16. The owner shall, as a requirement for Phase 3 of the development, undertake the construction of all infrastructure that is required for the proposed traffic control signals at the intersection of Dundas Street West and the proposed public road east of Shorncliffe Road, including the preparation of all functional and engineering drawings, including signal design, civil and pavement markings/signage drawings. All work shall be undertaken to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and at no cost to the City with the details, including timing of completion, secured in the context of subdivision approval.

 

17. Prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the owner shall pay the amount of $71,750.00 for the installation of the transit signal to the Toronto Transit Commission.

 

18. The owner shall make satisfactory arrangements with Engineering and Construction Services and enter into the appropriate agreement(s) with the City for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development, according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report and Traffic Impact Study to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

 

19. The owner shall, at its own cost and expense and in support of the development, design, remediate, construct and convey a new public road with the east-west section (from Shorncliffe Road to the north-south section of the future public road) having a minimum width of 18.5 metres and the north-south (from the east-west section of the future public road to Dundas Street West) having a minimum width of 22.2 metres in the locations illustrated on the draft plan of subdivision, together with associated municipal services both internal and external to the land, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

20. Prior to issuance of any building permit for all or any part of the development on the lands, the owner shall:

 

a. Enter into a financially secured subdivision agreement with the City pursuant to Section 51 of the Planning Act necessary to implement the plan of subdivision, including required external works, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; and

 

b. Obtain release for construction of services in accordance with the terms of the subdivision agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

21. Prior to issuance of the first above grade building permit for all or any part of the development on the lands, the owner shall:

 

a. Register the Plan of Subdivision to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in accordance with the requirements of the subdivision agreement; and

 

b. Complete the construction of the new road to base course asphalt and complete services, including external services, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

22. Prior to issuance of an above-grade building permit for all or any part of a building in Phase 2, the owner shall, on terms set out in the Section 37 Agreement and to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services, design a 21-metre private road, having the characteristics of a public road with the exception of ownership.

 

23. Prior to the earlier of first residential occupancy and first condominium registration of all or any portion of a building in Phase 2, the owner shall construct and thereafter maintain the private road, as well as prepare all documents, including a reference plan, and convey a public access easement for the private road in favour of the City for public and City use of the private road with the design, details and configuration to be determined and secured in the context of site plan approval. The required easement, including support rights as applicable, shall be conveyed for nominal consideration and at no cost to the City, free and clear of physical and title encumbrances with standard insurance and indemnification obligation, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.

 

24. The owner shall, as part of the development of each phase, provide boulevard improvements on City owned portions of all frontages of the lands on existing streets, including the Dundas Street West frontage along the future parkland, with design and details to be determined and secured in the context of site plan approval to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

25. The owner shall provide, at their own expense, canopy art features between the buildings within Phases 2 and 3, and within the transit reserve south of Building 4 and visible from Shorncliffe Road. The design, location of and financial securities for the canopy features are to be determined and secured in the context of site plan approval of Phases 3 and 4, respectively, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The owner shall have completed the construction of the canopy features prior to the earlier of first residential occupancy use and first condominium registration of all or any portion of a building within Phase 3, with respect to the completion of the canopy art feature between buildings within Phases 2 and 3, and within Phase 4 with respect to the completion of the canopy art feature within the transit reserve. The owner shall be responsible for the construction, maintenance and repair the canopy art features at its own expense.

 

26. The owner is required to maintain the rail safety measures as specified in the Peer Review completed by Aecom, dated September 14, 2020.

 

27. Through the site plan approval process, the owner shall implement the wind control measures identified in the Pedestrian Wind Study, dated November 14, 2019, prepared by RWDI and any future addendum, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. Any required mitigation measures shall be secured in the context of site plan approval for all buildings within the development.

 

28. The owner shall provide a vegetation clearance zone of 3.5 metres from the mutual property line to the satisfaction of Metrolinx through the site plan control application review process.

 

29. If and to the extent determined to be required by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in the context of site plan approval of Phases 2, 3 and 4, the owner shall prepare all documents and convey easement(s) in favour of the City in perpetuity, including support rights as applicable,  for City and public use of the landscape open space within the area identified as “Transit Reserve” shown on Schedule ‘B’ attached, and for the purpose of providing facilitating possible future public connection to transit stations located south east of the development to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The configuration and terms, including timing, of the public access easement(s) shall be determined and secured in the context of site plan approval, including requirements for conveyance for nominal consideration and at no cost to the City, free and clear of physical and title encumbrances with standard insurance and indemnification obligations to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor. 

 

30. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto District School Board regarding the required signage, warning clauses in any purchase of sale agreements with respect to school accommodation issues and information regarding estimated occupancy dates.

 

31. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto Catholic District School Board regarding the required warning clauses in any purchase of sale agreements and signage with respect to school accommodation issues.

 

32. The owner include the Ministry of Environment Warning Clause F in NPC-3000 relating to sound levels in any purchase of sales/rental agreements in the form as set out in the Section 37 Agreement.

 

33. The owner will construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1, Toronto Green Standard, and is encouraged to achieve Tier 2, Toronto Green Standard, or higher, where appropriate, consistent with the performance standards of Toronto Green Standards applicable at the time of the site plan application for each building.

 

8. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation than the component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, and may be amended from time to time.

 

9. City Council authorize City Officials to take such action as required in order to implement these recommendations, including execution of necessary agreements.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 22, 2021, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(October 30, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

 This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code, as amended by Site-Specific Zoning By-laws 1088-2002, 1100-2016 and 769-2016, to permit a comprehensive multi-phased mixed-use development which includes four buildings and eight towers at 5415-5481, 5485 & 5487 Dundas Street West and 15 & 25 Shorncliffe Road. This new proposal would over-ride the previously approved development on the subject lands with the exception of Phase 1, which is under construction.

 

The new development of Phases 2, 3, 4 and 6 would contain over 15,000 m2 of non-residential gross floor area and 2,875 residential units. The towers would range in height from 26 to 44 storeys. The application proposes a public street connecting Dundas Street West and Shorncliffe Road, as well as new municipal infrastructure upgrades to the existing sanitary sewer. The application will result in a total of 6,792 m2 of parkland, with the subject application proposing a 4,144 m2 public park fronting onto Dundas Street West and 2,468 m2 of parkland which is to be conveyed as part of the Phase 1 development. Although Phase 1 development does not form this application, this report also seeks City Council authority to amend the existing Section 37 agreement with respect to the timing of the Phase 1 parkland conveyance.

 

Site-Specific Zoning By-laws 1100-2016 and 769-2016 approved a multi-phased tall building development with six buildings and eight towers, 2,311 residential units, and an overall gross floor area of 215,988 m2. Not including the Phase 1 building that is under construction, the remaining permissions for the subject lands would be 2,016 residential units and with an overall gross floor area of 188,034 m2 within five buildings and seven towers. The new application proposes taller buildings and an overall gross floor area of 233,493 m2 on the same lands, which is a difference of 859 units and approximately 45,500 m2 from the previous approval.

An application for Draft Plan of Subdivision approval is required to create the new public street, the public park block and to secure municipal infrastructure upgrades.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). The site is consistent with the policies of the Official Plan and Etobicoke Centre Secondary Plan. The proposal respects and reinforces the existing and planned built form context of the surrounding area.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-laws and also advises that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 30, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 6, 8 and 10 to 16 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District on 5415-5481, 5485 and 5487 Dundas Street West and 15 and 25 Shorncliffe Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172873.pdf
Attachment 7: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172874.pdf
Attachment 9: Site-Specific Urban Design Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172875.pdf
(October 26, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172896.pdf

Speakers

Kate Cooper

Communications (Community Council)

(November 2, 2021) E-mail from Katherine McGuire (EY.New)
(November 4, 2021) E-mail from Dolly Shetty, Real Estate Assistant, Land Use Planning, Hydro One Networks Inc. (EY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/comm/communicationfile-138724.pdf
(November 5, 2021) E-mail from CP Proximity Ontario (EY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/comm/communicationfile-138725.pdf
(November 17, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EY.New)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from The Board of the South Eatonville Residents Association (EY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/comm/communicationfile-140124.pdf

EY28.2 - 41-75 Four Winds Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - Humber River - Black Creek
Attention
A communication has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the appeal respecting the Zoning By-law Amendment application (File Number 20 226957 WET 07 OZ), as proposed for the lands at 41-75 Four Winds Drive, and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues and report back on outcomes of such discussions as appropriate.

 

2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Order(s) be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises the Ontario Land Tribunal that:

 

a. The final form and content of the amending Zoning By-laws are satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor;

 

b. The owner has provided a revised Functional Servicing Report, a revised Stormwater Management Report, and a revised Geotechnical Report, such reports to be reviewed to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

c. The owner has provided a revised Transportation Impact Study, such report to be reviewed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services;

 

d. The owner has provided a revised Pedestrian Wind Study, such report to be reviewed with recommendations implemented as part of the amending Zoning By-laws and/or secured as a legal convenience in a development agreement, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

e. The owner has provided a revised Land Use Compatibility Study, such report to be peer reviewed by a third party consultant on behalf of the City and at the owners expense, with recommendations to be implemented as part of the amending Zoning By-laws and/or secured as a legal convenience in a development agreement, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

f. The owner has provided additional information related to the underground garage with off-site access from 455 Sentinel Road to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

g. The owner has made satisfactory arrangements with the City and has entered into the appropriate agreements for the design and construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support the development, according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report, Geotechnical Report and Traffic Impact Study accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; and

 

h. The owner has provided a revised Tree Preservation Plan and a revised Landscape Concept Plan to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

3. In the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, and the implementing amending Zoning By-laws are enacted prior to the earlier of September 18, 2022 or the day the City passes a community benefits charge by-law, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, securing appropriate services, facilities and other community benefits as may be required by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

4. In the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part and the implementing amending Zoning By-laws are enacted after the earlier of September 18, 2022 or the day the City passes a community benefits charge by-law, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to secure Community benefits and other matters in support of the development in a development agreement executed by the owner and registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor.

 

5. In the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into an agreement to secure the following as matters required to support the development:

 

a. The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Management Committee, and as updated by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on December 5, 6 and 7, 2017 through the adoption of Item PG23.9 of the Planning and Growth Management Committee, and as may be further amended by City Council from time to time; and

 

b. The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board regarding warning clauses and signage with respect to school accommodation issues.

 

6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Origin

(November 1, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

On December 9, 2020, an application was submitted to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 and city-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 for lands at 41-75 Four Winds Drive. The application proposes to permit three buildings of 9, 11 and 32 storeys consisting of 560 residential units and 1,422 square metres of commercial gross floor area, with a total gross floor area of 43,745 square metres and a Floor Space Index of 4.1 times the area of the lot. Vehicular parking is proposed at grade and within a one and four-level underground parking garage consisting of 350 spaces.            

 

The proposal does not conform to the built form policies of the Official Plan, and the emerging policies of the Council adopted Keele Finch Secondary Plan. As such, the proposal is not consistent with the PPS (2020) and does not conform with the Growth Plan.

 

On May 26, 2021, the Zoning By-law amendment application was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") by the applicant pursuant to Section 24(11) of the Planning Act citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within 90 days after the application was deemed complete.

 

This report recommends that City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff, to oppose the current proposal at the OLT and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 1, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 14 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District on 41-75 Four Winds Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172741.pdf

Speakers

Janis Jafffe-White
Tom Rakocevic, M.P.P., Humber River-Black Creek
Evan Holt, on behalf of York Condominium Corporation No. 112 and York Condominium Corporation No. 128

Communications (Community Council)

(November 12, 2021) E-mail from Yi Chu (EY.New)
(November 17, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EY.New)
(November 18, 2021) Letter from Janis Jaffe-White (EY.New)
(November 18, 2021) E-mail from Lynn Taylor (EY.New)

Communications (City Council)

(November 23, 2021) Petition from Yi Zhao, submitting a petition containing the names of approximately 108 persons. (CC.Main)

EY28.8 - 180 Queens Drive - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston

Community Council Recommendations

The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

  

1. City Council include the property at 180 Queens Drive on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register in accordance with the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion), attached as Attachment 3 to the report (October 21, 2021) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

Origin

(October 21, 2021) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the property at 180 Queens Drive on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value.

 

The subject property is situated prominently at the northeast corner of Queens Drive and Pine Street, south of Church Street, west of Jane Street, and north of John Street in the Weston neighbourhood. It contains a three-storey brick and stone house and was constructed in 1912 for the prominent Weston resident, Oliver Master, and his family.

 

The house is situated on a large corner lot and setback from Queens Drive, reflecting the original lot pattern and organization of the street. The subject property is a representative example of the Queen Anne Revival Style.

 

As one of the earliest properties constructed in the historic Town of Weston in the area east of Pine Street, south of Church Street, west of Jane Street, and north of William Street, the property at 180 Queens Drive is important in maintaining and supporting the context of the area. The property at 180 Queens Drive contributes to a sense of place within the Weston neighbourhood, and is valued by the local community as a significant part of the area's history and present-day context.

 

The property at 180 Queens Drive was nominated for inclusion on the Heritage Register by Cherri Hurst, President of the Weston Historical Society, on their behalf in September 2020.

 

Following research and evaluation according to Ontario Regulation 9/06, it has been determined that the property at 180 Queens Drive (Oliver Master House, 1912) is significant as a representative example of the Queen Anne Revival Style, as well as its association with Oliver Master, a prominent resident in Weston, and for it contributing to the historic context of the Weston neighbourhood.

 

The listing of non-designated properties with cultural heritage value on the Heritage Register extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Ontario Heritage Act should a development or demolition application be submitted. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed and designated properties.

 

Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 21, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning on 180 Queens Drive - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172561.pdf

8a - 180 Queens Drive - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register

Origin
(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

At its meeting on November 17, 2021, the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB28.1 and made recommendations to City Council.

 

This report recommends that City Council include the property at 180 Queens Drive on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value.

 

The subject property is situated prominently at the northeast corner of Queens Drive and Pine Street, south of Church Street, west of Jane Street, and north of John Street in the Weston neighbourhood. It contains a three-storey brick and stone house and was constructed in 1912 for the prominent Weston resident, Oliver Master, and his family.

 

The house is situated on a large corner lot and setback from Queens Drive, reflecting the original lot pattern and organization of the street. The subject property is a representative example of the Queen Anne Revival Style.

 

As one of the earliest properties constructed in the historic Town of Weston in the area east of Pine Street, south of Church Street, west of Jane Street, and north of William Street, the property at 180 Queens Drive is important in maintaining and supporting the context of the area. The property at 180 Queens Drive contributes to a sense of place within the Weston neighbourhood, and is valued by the local community as a significant part of the area's history and present-day context.

 

The property at 180 Queens Drive was nominated for inclusion on the Heritage Register by Cherri Hurst, President of the Weston Historical Society, on their behalf in September 2020.

 

Following research and evaluation according to Ontario Regulation 9/06, it has been determined that the property at 180 Queens Drive (Oliver Master House, 1912) is significant as a representative example of the Queen Anne Revival Style, as well as its association with Oliver Master, a prominent resident in Weston, and for it contributing to the historic context of the Weston neighbourhood.

 

The listing of non-designated properties with cultural heritage value on the Heritage Register extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Ontario Heritage Act should a development or demolition application be submitted. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed and designated properties.

 

Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on 180 Queens Drive - Inclusion on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-173475.pdf

EY28.13 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 6 Morley Court

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 6 Morley Court.

Origin

(October 19, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 6 Morley Court. The application indicates the reason for removal is due to concerns that the tree roots are damaging an inground pool.

 

The subject tree is a northern catalpa tree (Catalpa speciosa), measuring 54 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 19, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry on Application to Remove a Private Tree - 6 Morley Court
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172579.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 17, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (EY.New)

EY28.14 - Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition - Jane Street at Pritchard Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
Bill 983 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council prohibit northbound right-turns on a red signal at all times on Jane Street at Pritchard Avenue (north intersection).

 

2. City Council prohibit southbound right-turns on a red signal at all times on Jane Street at Pritchard Avenue (south intersection).

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Project Design and Management, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority to prohibit right-turn-on-red movements for northbound and southbound motor vehicle traffic on Jane Street at Pritchard Avenue. This prohibition is recommended to improve safety of the intersection for people walking, cycling, taking transit, or driving.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Jane Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Project Design and Management, Transportation Services on Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition - Jane Street at Pritchard Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172562.pdf

EY28.18 - Construction Staging Area - 300-304 The East Mall

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
2 - Etobicoke Centre, 3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

The Etobicoke York Community Council: 

 

1. Forwards the item to City Council without recommendations.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Etobicoke York Community Council:

 

1. Requested that the appropriate staff meet with the applicant, representatives from Bloorlea Middle School, and with the Ward Councillor to resolve concerns regarding dust emissions from the site.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on The East Mall, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

PCL Constructors Canada Inc. is constructing 29 and 10 storey rental towers at 300-304 The East Mall. The site is located on the west side of The East Mall between Gibbs Road and Bloor Street West.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to close the west sidewalk on The East Mall and the south sidewalk on Gibbs Road for a period of 36 months (i.e., December 16, 2021 to November 30, 2024) to facilitate construction staging operations. Pedestrian movements on the west side of The East Mall and on the south side of Gibbs Road abutting the site will be restricted and pedestrians will be directed to the east side sidewalk of The East Mall and to the north side sidewalk of Gibbs Road respectively.

 

There will be no impact on the traffic lanes on The East Mall or Gibbs Road.

 

During the course of the preparation of this report, staff noted that there is a discrepancy between the posted stopping prohibition signs on the north and south sides of Gibbs Road and the existing parking regulations. Recommendations 3, 4 and 5 will correct these inconsistencies.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services on Construction Staging Area - 300-304 The East Mall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172842.pdf

EY28.20 - Assumption of Services, Registered Plan 66M-2474, 2277 - 2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road - Lindvest Properties (Westshep) Limited

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - Humber River - Black Creek

Community Council Recommendations

The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council assume the services installed within the Plan of Subdivision and that the City formally assume the roads within the Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2474.

 

2. City Council authorize the Director, Engineering Review to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this Plan of Subdivision.

 

3. City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2474.

 

4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office at the expense of the Owner.

 

5. City Council authorize the City Clerk and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

 

6. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2474 to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(October 27, 2021) Report from the Director, Engineering Review, Engineering and Construction Services

Summary

This report recommends that the municipal services installed under the terms of the Subdivision Agreement between Lindvest Properties (Westshep) Limited and the City of Toronto for Plan 66M-2474, dated December 23, 2009, be assumed by the City.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 27, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Engineering Review, Engineering and Construction Services on Assumption of Services, Registered Plan 66M-2474, 2277 - 2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road - Lindvest Properties (Westshep) Limited
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-172560.pdf

EY28.22 - Non-Residential Demolition Application - 1844 Weston Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston

Community Council Recommendations

The Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the application to demolish the vacant one-storey non-residential building with the following conditions:

 

a. construction fences be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article 7, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;

 

b. all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;

 

c. sod be laid on the site and that the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 629-10, paragraph B and 629-11, or an alternative acceptable to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and,

 

d. any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill.

Origin

(November 1, 2021) Report from the Deputy Chief Building Official and Director, Toronto Building, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This staff report is about a matter that shall be referred to City Council for consideration and final decision in respect of the former City of York By-Law 3102-95.

 

In accordance with City of York, Special Demolition Control By-Law 3102-95 and the City of York Act 1994 (Number 2), the application for the demolition of an existing vacant one-storey non-residential building located on the lands municipally known as 1844 Weston Road is being referred to City Council to refuse or grant the demolition application, including any conditions to be attached to the permit, because a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 1, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 to 4 from the Deputy Chief Building Official and Director, Toronto Building, Etobicoke York District on Non-Residential Demolition Application - 1844 Weston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-173417.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 28

NY28.2 - Request for Directions - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application - 2810 to 2814 Bayview Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing in opposition to the vehicular access and parking spaces as proposed and authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as may be necessary.

 

2. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with Transportation Services and other appropriate staff, to work with the Ministry of Transportation to identify an appropriate level of vehicular traffic and associated parking with the development so that a curb cut on Bayview Avenue is permitted.

 

3. City Council, should the Ministry of Transportation accept a curb cut scenario along Bayview Avenue, direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff work with the applicant to modify the proposal to provide a curb cut on Bayview Avenue and report back to City Council on the outcome of those discussions.

 

4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other City staff to take such actions as necessary to give effect to City Council's decision.

Origin

(October 25, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to construct a seven storey (21.3 metres) residential building at 2810 to 2814 Bayview Avenue. The proposed building would have 61 dwellings units and have vehicular access from Irvington Crescent.

 

The applicant has appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "OLT") due to City Council's failure to make a decision within the timeframes prescribed in the Planning Act.

 

This report summarizes the proposal and provides analysis of the relevant provincial and City policies as they apply to the application. It recommends that City Council direct staff to attend the OLT hearing in support of the application.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 25, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 11 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Application for 2810 to 2814 Bayview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-172750.pdf

Speakers

Kee Fung
Laura Lothian-Bryant
Barbara Garbens
Ron Baird
Esther Choi

Communications (Community Council)

(November 18, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Supp)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Kee Fung (NY.Supp)

Communications (City Council)

(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Christopher Tanzola, Partner, Overland LLP (CC.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/comm/communicationfile-142588.pdf

NY28.3 - Request for Directions - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 5203 to 5215 Yonge Street and 11 Parkview Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff, to oppose the application at the Ontario Land Tribunal in its current form.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant, to address the issues outlined in the report (November 1, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and to report back to City Council on the outcome of those discussions, including with regard to community benefits to be secured pursuant to Section 37 in connection with any revised proposal, as appropriate.

 

3. City Council, should the Ontario Land Tribunal approve the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments, authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Land Tribunal withhold its Final Order approving the application until such time as:

 

a. the Ontario Land Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City;

 

b. the City Solicitor confirms that a Section 37 Agreement satisfactory to the City Solicitor and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has been executed and registered to secure appropriate community benefits and other matters in support of the development;

 

c. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has addressed the outstanding issues identified in the memorandum dated February 3, 2021 from the Manager, Development Engineering, Engineering and Construction Services, including an updated Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report that addresses staff's concerns;

 

d. the City Solicitor confirms that the owner has designed and provided financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, and Geohydrology Report to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, and Geohydrology Report, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and

 

e. the City Solicitor confirms that the implementation of the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report and Geohydrology Report accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services either does not require changes to the proposed amending by-laws or any such required changes have been made to the proposed amending by-laws to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the City Solicitor and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

4. City Council, should the Ontario Land Tribunal approve the application, approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the applicant of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Such development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the applicant of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.

Origin

(November 1, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 for the property at 5203 to 5215 Yonge Street and 11 Parkview Avenue to permit a thirty-two storey (105.1 metres) mixed use building.

 

The applicant has appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "OLT") due to City Council's failure to make a decision within the timeframe prescribed in the Planning Act. A second Case Management Conference has been scheduled for January 26, 2022.

 

This report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with City Planning and other appropriate staff, attend the OLT hearing in opposition to the application. It also recommends that staff continue to have discussions with the applicant in an effort to resolve the issues outlined in this report and to report back to City Council on the outcome, as appropriate.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 1, 2021) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1 to 4) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachment 5) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 5203 to 5215 Yonge Street and 11 Parkview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-172694.pdf

Speakers

Sharolyn Mathieu Vettese

Communications (Community Council)

(November 18, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Supp)

NY28.4 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment: Removal of the Holding (H) Symbol - 719 Sheppard Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - York Centre
Attention
Bill 971 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, as amended by By-law 338-2015, for the lands at 719 Sheppard Avenue West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 5 to the report (October 28, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Origin

(October 28, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law 7625 and site-specific Zoning By-law 338-2015 to remove the Holding (H) Symbol for the lands currently zoned RM6(227)(H). This zone permits a 9-storey, 91-unit, midrise building with live/work units on the ground floor and residential units above.

 

The existing site-specific Zoning By-law contains a Holding (H) symbol due to existing sanitary capacity issues.  A solution for the sanitary capacity issues has been identified and the contract for the works has been awarded.  As such, the Chief Engineer and Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services is satisfied that the works will be completed before occupancy of this project and is satisfied that the Hold can be removed.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to lift the Holding (H) Symbol for the lands at 719 Sheppard Avenue West.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020).  The redevelopment proposal is in keeping with the Official Plan and the Sheppard West/Dublin Secondary Plan.  By removing the Hold the Council-approved development can proceed.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 28, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 7 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Zoning By-law Amendment: Removal of the Holding (H) Symbol for 719 Sheppard Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-172695.pdf

NY28.5 - Final Report - Application to Lift a Holding Provision "(H)" on Phase 2 Lands for 5799 to 5915 Yonge Street, 45 and 53 Cummer Avenue, and 46 and 47 Averill Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 64-2021(LPAT), as amended by Zoning By-law 75-2021, for Phase 2 of the 5799 to 5915 Yonge Street, 45 and 53 Cummer Avenue, and 46 and 47 Averill Crescent development to remove the Holding provision "(H)" substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 1 to the report (November 1, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Origin

(November 1, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to lift the Holding provision "(H)" for the Phase 2 lands of the 5799 to 5915 Yonge Street, 45 and 53 Cummer Avenue, and 46 and 47 Averill Crescent development.  The Holding provision "(H)" for Phase 3 of the subject lands will continue to apply.  The lifting of the "(H)" for Phase 2 will permit the development of a mixed-use building with a total gross floor area (GFA) of 66,838.9 square metres, consisting of 63,152.3 square metres of residential GFA, 58.6 square metres of retail GFA and 3,628.0 square metres of commercial GFA.

 

The mixed-use building contains two towers on a shared podium. One tower will be 34 storeys (106.3 metres excluding the mechanical penthouse) and the other tower will be 40 storeys (123.5 metres excluding the mechanical penthouse). 

 

Phase 2 also includes a minimum 5190 square metre, City-owned community recreation facility, including a daycare of 900 square metres, and an abutting 300 square metres of outdoor play space as required by the zoning by-law and the Section 37 agreement.

 

The development was approved on May 2nd, 2019, by the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (Case No. PL140111) (the "LPAT", now called the Ontario Land Tribunal or "OLT") under City file number 11 287471 NNY 24 OZ, including the Holding provision.

 

The development of Block 2 is contingent on the lifting of the Holding provision.  Section 9 of By-law No. 64-2021 (LPAT) requires the clearance of conditions, which are outlined further in this report.  These conditions have been cleared to the satisfaction of Engineering and Construction Services, Transportation Services and City Planning.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law by lifting the Holding provision "(H)" on the Phase 2 lands as the proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020), and also conforms to the City's Official Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 1, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on an Application to Lift a Holding Provision "(H)" on Phase 2 Lands for 5799 to 5915 Yonge Street, 45 and 53 Cummer Avenue, and 46 and 47 Averill Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-172737.pdf

NY28.6 - Final Report - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate, as generally illustrated in Attachment 3 to the report (October 22, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2. City Council, prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill for enactment,  require the owner to:

 

a. provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law; and

 

b. register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the subject lands described in Schedule “A” in Attachment 4 to the report (October 22, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District , without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from all or any portion of the lands in the City Solicitor's sole discretion after consulting with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning at such a time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title to the lands or any portion thereof against which the Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act has been registered.

 

5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Origin

(October 22, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application is requesting exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act for the lands municipally known as 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate. The exemption request is to facilitate the creation and conveyance of 67 lots for a three-storey residential townhouse development.  An application for Draft Plan of Common Element Condominium (20 233440 NNY 16 CD) has also been submitted for approval in conjunction with this application. The Common Element Condominium application is currently under review by the Chief Planner, pursuant to the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, which proposes to establish a private north-south vehicular driveway that connects Clintwood Gate and Curlew Drive, a common below grade parking garage, a private open space block, and pedestrian walkways in between the townhouse blocks.

 

The requested Part Lot Control Exemption is required to permit the creation of the 67 conveyable lots for the townhouses currently under construction, which will become the Parcels of Tied Land (POTLs) to the Common Element Condominium. The Common Element Condominium Corporation to be established will ensure pedestrian and vehicular access and the maintenance of these shared spaces.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020), conforms with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020), and conforms to the Official Plan. The lifting of Part Lot Control is appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This reports reviews and recommends approval of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law that would be in effect for a maximum of two years. Furthermore, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Lands Titles Act against the subject lands, as described in "Schedule A" in Attachment 4 of this report. This is to ensure  that no part of the lands can be conveyed or mortgaged without prior consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 22, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 4 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on a Part Lot Control Exemption Application for 1970 Victoria Park Avenue and 9 Clintwood Gate
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-172736.pdf

NY28.7 - Final Report - Application under Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002 and Site Plan Control - 101 Senlac Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Willowdale

Statutory - Funeral Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

           

1. City Council find that the request to construct a one-storey columbarium contemplated in File 20 171769 NNY 18 SA, at the York Cemetery located at 101 Senlac Road is in the public interest and approve the application under the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002 and Ontario Regulation 30/11.

 

2. City Council direct that the City Clerk publish notice of City Council's decision in Recommendation 1 above in accordance with the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002.

 

3. City Council direct that the City Clerk provide notice of City Council's decision in Recommendation 1 above to the Registrar and to the applicant under the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002, together with supporting materials, including a copy of the Report of the Director, Community Planning North York District, dated October 25, 2021.

 

4. City Council delegate back to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate the authority to issue the Notice of Approval Conditions contained in Attachment 5 to the report (October 25, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, upon expiry of the appeal period following Clerk's notice and no appeal having been filed under the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002.

 

5. City Council delegate back to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or their designate the authority to issue final Site Plan Approval.

Origin

(October 25, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The applicant proposes to construct a one-storey columbarium at the York Cemetery and 17 new parking spaces, including one accessible parking space. The application requires City Council consideration under the Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002 (the "FBCS Act") and is subject to site plan approval under the City of Toronto Act, 2006. At the request of the local Councillor, staff were directed to report to City Council, through North York Community Council, as per the 'bump up' provision in By-law No. 483-2000 for Site Plan Control applications.

 

Matters related to the establishment, alteration and expansion of cemeteries, burial sites and crematoriums are addressed under the FBCS Act and Ontario Regulation 30/11 (the "Regulation"). The FBCS Act requires the registrar's consent together with the approval of the local municipality for a proposal to establish, alter, or increase the capacity of a cemetery. The applicant is required to obtain the City's approval, prior to requesting approval from the registrar. The FBCS Act also specifies that a local municipality that receives such a request shall grant the approval if, in the municipality's opinion, it is in the public interest. City of Toronto By-law 580-2009 does not delegate to the Chief Planner the authority to make findings of public interest on behalf of the municipality under the FBCS Act. Therefore, the determination and approval must be made by City Council.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 25, 2021) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawing (Attachments 1 to 5) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachments 6 to 7) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on an Application under Funeral, Burial and Cremation Services Act, 2002 and Site Plan Control for 101 Senlac Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-172738.pdf

Speakers

Jeff Dennis, Director Development, Mount Pleasant Group of Cemeteries
Richard Verrier, Carrier Mausoleums Construction Inc.

Communications (Community Council)

(November 18, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Supp)

NY28.15 - Payment-In-Lieu of Parking - 14 St. Clements Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council exempt the applicant at 14 St. Clements Avenue from the City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 parking space requirement of 5 spaces for the proposed day nursery use on the site, subject to a $12,500 payment-in-lieu of parking, provided the applicant signs a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Origin

(November 2, 2021) Report from the Director, Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services

Summary

This report seeks the City Council's approval to exempt the owner of 14 St. Clements Avenue from the non-residential parking space requirement specified in City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013.

 

The site was the subject of Minor Variance Application No. A0019/21NY, which proposed an addition to the northwest corner of the building in conjunction with interior alterations to the basement and ground floor. In accordance with the above-noted By-law, a minimum of 5 parking spaces would be required for the site given the proposed use. The applicant is unable to accommodate any of the required parking spaces on-site and has requested a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking to the City, which amounts to $12,500.

 

The parking space exemption associated with the Payment-In-Lieu of Parking application is considered appropriate given that the associated parking space shortfall will not have a significant impact on parking conditions in the immediate area.

 

Section 40 of the Planning Act grants City Council the authority to approve payment-in-lieu of parking. This application has been made pursuant to the City's Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Policy, as adopted in July 2004. City Council approval is required as this matter has not been delegated.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 2, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services on Payment-In-Lieu of Parking for 14 St. Clements Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-172812.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Joshua Benard (NY.New)
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Paul Pietrulewicz, Board Chair, Upper Yonge Village Daycare Centre (NY.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/comm/communicationfile-140245.pdf

NY28.24 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 31 Norden Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 31 Norden Crescent.

Origin

(October 1, 2021) Letter from City Council

Summary

City Council on October 1, 2021, referred Item NY26.35, headed "Application to Remove a Private Tree - 31 Norden Crescent", back to North York Community Council for further consideration.

                                                                 ______________

 

The report (August 13, 2021) from the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 31 Norden Crescent.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 1, 2021) Referral from City Council - Item NY26.35 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 31 Norden Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-173079.pdf
(August 13, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Application to Remove a Private Tree at 31 Norden Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-173097.pdf

Speakers

John Zinati, Zinati Katy, Barristers & Solicitors

Communications (Community Council)

(September 28, 2021) E-mail from John Zinati (NY.Main)
(November 18, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (NY.Supp)
(November 22, 2021) E-mail from John Zinati (NY.New)

NY28.27 - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - 232 Snowdon Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's Decision regarding Application A0647/21NY respecting 232 Snowdon Avenue.

 
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement of the appeal of Application A0647/21NY respecting 232 Snowdon Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at her discretion after consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Director of Community Planning, North York District.
  

3. City Council, in the event that a settlement is not reached, authorize the City Solicitor, along with appropriate City staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Board in order to oppose the minor variances requested in Application A0647/21NY respecting 232 Snowdon Avenue and to retain outside consultants as necessary.

Summary

On November 4, the "Applicant" applied to the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") for two minor variances to facilitate the construction of a new dwelling: floor space index, and front and rear exterior main wall height (the "Application").

 

In a report from the Director, Community Planning North York District, dated October 28, 2021, City Planning recommended that the floor space index be reduced from 0.75 to 0.68 times the area of the lot or under, and that the front and rear exterior main wall height be reduced from 8.44 metres to below 8 metres. In the attached staff report, City Planning opined that the additional height and massing should be improved (through the forgoing reductions to the floor space index and the front and rear exterior main wall height) to be more in keeping with the prevailing character of the neighbourhood.

 

At the hearing on November 4, 2021, the Committee modified and approved the minor variance Application with one condition. The Committee reduced the front and rear exterior main wall height from 8.44 metres to 8 metres, but did not reduce the floor space index as recommended by City Planning. A copy of the Committee's decision is attached.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the deadline to appeal the Committee's decision to the Toronto Local Appeal Body is on November 24, 2021.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 22, 2021) Letter from Councillor Jaye Robinson, Ward 15, Don Valley West on Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body for 232 Snowdon Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-173618.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance for 232 Snowdon Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-173619.pdf
Attachment 2 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to the Committee of Adjustment, North York District on Committee of Adjustment Application for 232 Snowdon Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-173620.pdf

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 28

SC28.1 - Final Report - 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road - Rental Housing Demolition Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the Rental Housing Demolition application (20 222609 ESC 20 RH) under Chapter 667 of Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to allow the demolition of ten (10) rental dwelling units at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. the owner shall provide and maintain ten (10) replacement rental dwelling units on the lands at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road for a period of at least 20 years from the date each such unit is first occupied. During such 20-year period, no replacement rental dwelling unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership housing that provides a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, including life-lease or co-ownership, and no application shall be made to demolish or convert any replacement rental unit to a non-residential rental purpose. The ten (10) replacement rental dwelling units shall be comprised of six (6) one-bedroom units and four (4) two-bedroom units, as generally illustrated in the plans submitted to the City Planning Division dated June 25, 2021. Any revision to these plans shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

b. the owner shall provide and maintain the ten (10) replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above at affordable rents, as currently defined in the Toronto Official Plan, for a period of at least 10 years beginning from the date of first occupancy of each unit. The ten (10) affordable replacement rental units shall collectively contain a total gross floor area of at least 570 square metres and be comprised of six (6) one-bedroom units and four (4) two-bedroom units;

 

c. the owner shall provide an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to all Eligible Tenants of the ten (10) existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road, addressing the right to return to occupy one of the replacement rental dwelling units at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road at similar rents and other assistance to mitigate hardship. The Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan shall be developed in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

d. the owner shall provide tenants of all ten (10) replacement rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the proposed development at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road at no extra charge, and on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the development, without the need to pre-book or pay a fee unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;

 

e. the owner shall provide ensuite laundry in each replacement rental dwelling unit within the proposed development at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road at no additional cost to tenants;

 

f. the owner shall provide central air conditioning in each replacement rental dwelling unit within the proposed development at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road at no additional cost to tenants;

 

g. the owner shall provide and make available for rent at least four (4) vehicular parking spaces to tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units, and such vehicular parking spaces shall be made available firstly to returning tenants who previously used a vehicle parking space at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road, secondly to returning tenants who did not previously use a vehicle parking space at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road, and thirdly to new tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units;

 

h. the owner shall provide tenants of the replacement rental dwelling units with access to all bicycle and visitor vehicular parking on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the proposed development at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road;

 

i. the owner shall not apply for, or receive the issuance of, any below-grade or above-grade building permit(s) for the proposed development at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road prior to the issuance of the above-grade building permit(s) and any required below-grade building permits for the proposed development at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road, which shall contain the (10) replacement rental dwelling units required in Recommendation 1.a. above; and the owner shall notify Toronto Building in writing of the same at the time of application for any below-grade or above-grade building permit(s) for both of the proposed developments at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road and 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road; and

 

j. the owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands at 2380 to 2328 Kingston Road and 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road, agreements pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 1.a. to 1.i. above, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the demolition of the ten (10) existing rental dwelling units at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. the conditions in Recommendation 1 above have been fully satisfied and secured;

 

b. the Minor Variance for 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road is final and binding;

 

c. the issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval for 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

 

d. the issuance of excavation and shoring permits, if applicable, for the approved structure at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road;

 

e. the execution and registration of agreements pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 securing the conditions in Recommendation 1 above; and

 

f. the City has received written confirmation that all ten (10) existing rental dwelling units proposed to be demolished at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road are vacant.

 

3. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to issue a Rental Housing Demolition permit (Section 111 permit) under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has issued the Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above.

 

4. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building Division to issue a residential demolition permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act and Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code for 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has issued the Preliminary Approval referred to in Recommendation 2 above, which may be included in the Rental Housing Demolition permit pursuant to section 6.2 of Chapter 363, on condition that:

 

a. the owner removes all debris and rubble from the site immediately after demolition;

 

b. the owner erects solid construction hoarding to the satisfaction of the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building; and

 

c. the owner applies for, and receives approval of, a building permit for a replacement building at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road no later than three (3) years from the date that the demolition of the existing building commences.

 

5. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement City Council's decision, including execution of the Section 111 agreement and other related agreements.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 26, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 2, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

A Rental Housing Demolition application (20 222609 ESC 20 RH) has been submitted under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of

Toronto Act, 2006 to demolish an existing mixed-use building containing 10 rental dwelling units at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road. The applicant is proposing to replace the 10 rental units that are proposed to be demolished within a new six-storey purpose-built rental apartment building containing 39 rental dwelling units (inclusive of the 10 replacement rental units) at 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road. The lands at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road are proposed to be redeveloped with an eight-storey condominium apartment building containing 40 condominium dwelling units.

 

The properties are also the subject of Minor Variance applications (21 180761 ESC 20 MV for 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road  and 21 202600 ESC 20 MV for 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road). The Minor Variance application for 2380 to 2382 Kingston Road was approved by the Committee of Adjustment on October 20, 2021 subject to City Council approving the Rental Housing Demolition application to demolish the existing 10 rental dwelling units at 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road.

 

This report recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code and the residential demolition permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to the owner replacing the ten existing rental units by their respective unit types and sizes and at similar rents to those in effect at the time of application, providing an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to mitigate hardship for existing tenants, and securing other matters to the satisfaction to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building Division.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 2, 2021) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Final Report - 2446A, 2448 to 2450 Kingston Road - Rental Housing Demolition Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-172731.pdf
(November 5, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-172923.pdf

Speakers

Sean McGaffey, Senior Urban Designer and Planner, Walker Nott Dragecevic Associates Limited
Finley McEwan, Applicant

SC28.2 - Final Report - 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362 Kennedy Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - Scarborough - Agincourt

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362 Kennedy Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment in Attachment 5 to the report (November 4, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District and the Director, Housing Policy and Strategy, Housing Secretariat.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

3. City Council accept an on-site parkland dedication (the "Parkland") pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, by the owner having a total area of not less than 14,580 square metres, generally as shown as Blocks 8, 9 and 10 in the Draft Plan of Subdivision found in Attachment 17 to the report (November 4, 2021), with the exact size, location and configuration of the Parkland to be to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and such Parkland to be transferred to the City, free and clear, above and below-grade, of all easements, encumbrances and encroachments, in an acceptable environmental condition, and in a phased manner in accordance with Recommendation 4, below and pursuant to the registration of a phased plan of subdivision as set out in Recommendation 10, below.

 

4. City Council require that the Parkland be conveyed to the City in phases, and may be improved with Above Base Park Improvements, generally as follows:

 

a. Sheppard Park (2,480 square metres) generally as shown as Block 8 in Attachment 17 shall to be conveyed in Phase 1 prior to the issuance of above grade building permit for any residential use on Blocks 5, 6, and 7;

 

b. Central Park (12,100 square metres) is to be conveyed in 2 park blocks  generally as shown as Blocks 9 and 10 in Attachment 17 to the report (November 4, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District and the Director, Housing Policy and Strategy, Housing Secretariat;

 

c. Block 9 shall be conveyed  prior to the issuance of any above grade building permits for residential uses on Blocks 1 or 2 generally as shown on Attachment 17 to the report (November 4, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District and the Director, Housing Policy and Strategy, Housing Secretariat; and

 

d. Block 10 will be conveyed prior to the issuance of any above grade building permit for residential uses on Block 3 in Phase 3.

 

5. City Council require the Owner to design and construct Base Park Improvements, and may design and construct Above Base Park Improvements on each of the Blocks comprising the Parkland, which shall not exceed the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges. Should the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Owner agree that the Owner shall design and construct Above Base Park Improvements, which election must be made prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for any part of the Development, then prior to the issuance of any above-grade building permit for any part of the Development, the owner shall submit a design and cost estimate for the Above Base Park Improvements, to be approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and a letter of credit equal to 120 percent of the Parks and Recreation Development Charges payable for the development.

 

6. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of any Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing  the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.

 

7. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Child Care component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Child Care Centre (as defined in Recommendation 10, below), to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Children's Services. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of (1) the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Child Care Centre minus $3,666,719.00, and (2) the Child Care component of the Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time

 

8. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Community Agency Space (as defined in Recommendation 10), to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. The development charge credit shall be in amount that is the lesser of (1) the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Community Space minus $1,000,000.00, and (2) the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.

 

9. Prior to introducing the necessary bills to City Council for enactment the owner shall, at its sole cost and expense,:

 

a. submit a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, Hydrogeological Report and supporting documents (the "Engineering Reports"), including confirmation of water and fire flow, sanitary and storm capacity, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

b. address all outstanding engineering issues identified in the Engineering Reports by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water, and any other comments that may arise further to the review of materials submitted as part of the process to address the issues set out in the memorandum from Engineering and Construction Services, and the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

10. Prior to introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to secure the following facilities or matters, which shall also be secured in the Zoning By-law Amendment, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor:

 

a. the community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

1. the design, construction, finishing, maintenance and provision of at least 272 affordable rental housing dwelling units comprised of at least 16,864 square metres of residential Gross Floor Area on the lands at 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362  Kennedy Road (the "Affordable Housing Units"), provided that the Affordable Housing Units  approved for the City of Toronto’s Open Door Affordable Housing Program incentives all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in accordance with the following terms:

 

aa. at least thirty (30) of the Affordable Housing Units shall be a three-bedroom or four-bedroom rental unit with a minimum unit size of 84 square metres and an average size of 92 square metres;

 

bb. at least eighty-six (86) of the affordable rental dwelling units shall be two-bedroom rental units with a minimum unit size of 60 square metres and an average size of 67 square metres;

 

cc. at least one hundred fifty-six (156) of the Affordable Housing Units shall be one-bedroom rental units with a minimum unit size of 48 square metres and an average size of 55 square metres;

 

dd. the Affordable Housing Units shall be phased such that a minimum of 114 of the Affordable Housing Units shall be provided on Blocks 5 and /or 6 as part of Phase 1, a minimum of 101 of the Affordable Housing Units shall be provided on Blocks 1, 2 and/or 3 as part of Phase 2 of the development, and any remaining Affordable Housing Units shall be provided on Block 4 as part of Phase 3 of the development; and notwithstanding the foregoing, the owner shall be permitted to deliver the Affordable Housing Units at an earlier stage of the development upon arrangements satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat;

 

ee.  the location and layouts of the Affordable Housing Units shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, provided that the City will not require the location of any such unit be on the sixth floor or higher in any Block;

 

ff. the owner shall provide and maintain the Affordable Housing Units as secured rental housing for a minimum period of 40 years beginning from the date that each such unit is first occupied (the "Affordability Period"). During the Affordability Period, no Affordable Housing Unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership housing that provides a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, including life-lease or co-ownership, and no application shall be made to demolish any Affordable Housing Unit or to convert any Affordable Housing Unit to a non-residential rental purpose. Upon the expiration of the Affordability Period, the owner shall continue to provide and maintain the units as rental dwelling units, unless and until such time as the owner has applied for, and obtained, all approvals necessary to do otherwise; 

 

gg. the owner shall provide and maintain the Affordable Housing Units with Affordable Rents for the Affordability Period. The initial rent (inclusive of utilities) charged to the first tenants of any Affordable Housing Units shall not exceed 100% of the average rent for the same bedroom type in the City of Toronto, as reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in its most recent annual Rental Market Report;

 

hh. if an Affordable Housing Unit becomes vacant and is re-rented to a new tenant during the Affordability Period, the initial rent (inclusive of utilities) charged to the new tenant shall not exceed 100 percent of the average rent for the same bedroom type in the City of Toronto, as reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in its most recent annual Rental Market Report;

 

ii. after the first year of occupancy of any Affordable Housing Units, the rent (inclusive of utilities) charged to the first tenants or new tenants occupying such unit may be escalated annually by not more than the annual provincial rent guideline, regardless of whether such guideline is applicable to the units under the Residential Tenancies Act or any successor legislation governing residential tenancies in Ontario, until the tenancy ends;

 

jj. notwithstanding the annual rent increases permitted in ii. above, the rent (inclusive of utilities) charged to any first tenants or new tenants occupying an Affordable Housing Unit shall not be increased to an amount that exceeds 100 percent of the average rent for the same unit type in the City of Toronto, as reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in its most recent annual Rental Market Report;

 

kk. at least six months in advance of any new Affordable Housing Units being made available for rent to the general public, the owner shall develop and implement a Tenant Access Plan to ensure units are rented to eligible households in consultation with, and to the satisfaction of, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat;

 

ll. the new Affordable Housing Units to be constructed as part of each phase shall be made ready and available for occupancy no later than the date by which seventy percent (70 percent) of the new dwelling units as part of the construction of that phase. above are available and ready for occupancy, or to the satisfaction of, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat.

 

mm. the owner shall provide all tenants of the affordable rental dwelling units with access to, and use of, all indoor and outdoor amenities in the building in which such tenant resides at no extra charge; access to, and use of, these amenities shall be provided on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;

 

nn. access to, and use of, these amenities shall be provided on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building in which the Affordable Housing Units are located, without the need to pre-book or pay a fee, unless specifically required as a customary practice for private bookings;

 

oo. The owner shall provide all tenants of the Affordable Housing Units with laundry facilities on the same basis as other units within building in which the Affordable Housing Units are located at no extra charge; and

 

pp. the owner shall provide all tenants of the Affordable Housing Units with access to permanent and visitor bicycle parking/bicycle lockers on the same terms and conditions as any other resident of the building in which the Affordable Housing Units are located, and in accordance with the Zoning By-law;

 

2. the design, construction, finishing and equipping of a non-profit licensed child care facility to be located in the second floor of the building on Block 2, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Children's Services, to accommodate at a minimum 62 children, including infants, toddlers and preschoolers, comprising a minimum of 1,060 square metres of interior space and approximately 347 square metres of exterior space adjacent to the interior space including outdoor storage and four (4) parking spaces reserved for the exclusive use of the child care facility for pick-up/drop-off operations, (the "Child Care Centre"), including:

 

aa. the conveyance of the Child Care Centre at no cost to the City, in fee simple, prior to first occupancy of the Building on Block 2;

 

bb. on, or prior to the conveyance of the Child Care Centre, the City and the owner shall enter into and register on title to, the appropriate lands, an Easement and Cost Sharing Agreement for nominal consideration and at no cost to the City, that is in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; the Easement and Cost Sharing Agreement shall address and/or provide for the integrated support, use, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and reconstruction of certain shared facilities, and the sharing of costs in respect thereof, or portions of the subject lands to be owned by the City and the owner as they pertain to the Child Care Centre;

 

cc. a letter of credit in an amount sufficient to guarantee 120 percent of the estimated cost of the design, construction and handover of the Child Care Centre complying with the specifications and requirements of the Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Children's Services and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, will be provided to the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the building on Block 2, to secure the Child Care Centre;

 

dd. a one-time cash contribution in the amount of $150,000.00 to be used toward start-up costs to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the building on Block 2;

 

ee. a one-time cash contribution in the amount of $150,000.00 to the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund, to replace appliances and large equipment due to wear and tear, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the building on Block 2;

 

ff. all cash contributions shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for Toronto calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment

 

gg. four (4) dedicated parking spaces will be provided free-of-charge for the exclusive use of the child care facility for pick-up/drop-off operations. These spaces to be assigned accordingly, and be located in close proximity to the elevators providing the shortest route between the underground parking garage and the Child Care Centre, which shall be barrier-free. A parking pass will be provided for officials conducting inspections of the child care facility; and

 

hh. any other details related to the Child Care Centre such as timing, location, obligations and any matters necessary to implement the Child Care Centre, which have not been addressed in the Recommendations of this report  will be finalized between the owner and the City and will be substantially in accordance with the City of Toronto's Child Care Development Guidelines (2021) and to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Corporate and Real Estate Management, the General Manager, Children's Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the City Solicitor;

 

3. prior to the earlier of condominium registration and the first residential use of any residential building for Block 2, the owner shall substantially complete construction of 1,090 square metres of Community Agency Space to be located on the ground floor of the building on Block 2 (the "Community Agency Space"), which is to be provided to the City at no cost for public use and subject to the following:

 

aa. the Community Agency Space shall be delivered to the City in accordance with the City's Community Space Tenancy Policy and finished to Base Building Condition, with the terms and specifications to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement, all satisfactory to the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

bb. prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit, the owner shall provide a letter of credit in the amount sufficient to guarantee 120 percent of the estimated cost of the design, construction and conveyance of the Community Agency Space complying with the specifications and requirements of the Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; and

 

cc. on, or prior to the conveyance of the Community Agency Space, the City and the owner shall enter into and register on title to, the appropriate lands, an Easement and Cost Sharing Agreement for nominal consideration and at no cost to the City, that is in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor; the Easement and Cost Sharing Agreement shall address and/or provide for the integrated support, use, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement and reconstruction of certain shared facilities, and the sharing of costs in respect thereof, or portions of the subject lands to be owned by the City and the owner as they pertain to the Community Agency Space;

 

4. the preparation of a public art plan, in accordance with City Planning's Percent for Public Art process, and with approval from City Council, including that:

 

aa. prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for any residential use on Block 7, the owner shall submit a public art plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, detailing the design and construction of an on-site public art installation with a minimum value of $250,000.00, with such value upwardly indexed in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of delivery of the financial security required by this Recommendation; and 

 

bb. prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for any residential use on Block 7, the owner shall provide a letter of credit in the amount sufficient to guarantee 120 percent of the estimated indexed cost of the design and construction of the public art to be installed in accordance with the public art plan;

 

b. the following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:

 

1. prior to the earlier of the issuance of the first above grade building permit for any residential use on Block 5, 6 and Block 7, the owner shall provide to the city the municipal services necessary for Phase 1, and convey to the City the Park Block 8, all associated with the first phase registration of the plan of subdivision pursuant to the approval of application 19 236443 ESC 22 SB;

 

2. prior to the earlier of the issuance of the first above grade building permit for any residential use on Block 1, Block 2 and Block 4, the owner shall provide to the city the municipal services necessary for Phase 2, and convey to the City the Park Block 9, all associated with the second phase registration of the plan of subdivision pursuant to the approval of application 19 236443 ESC 22 SB;

 

3. prior to the earlier of the issuance of the first above grade building permit for any residential use on Block 3 the owner shall provide to the city the municipal services necessary for Phase 3, and convey to the City the Park Block 10, all associated with the third phase registration of the plan of subdivision pursuant to the approval of application 19 236443 ESC 22 SB;

 

4. the owner shall develop the municipal services for the site in accordance with the following sequence, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services:

 

aa. all municipal services necessary for Phase 1, as described in the Phasing Plan, shall be provided first;

 

bb. all municipal services necessary for Phase 2, as described in the Phasing Plan, shall be provided second;

 

cc. all municipal services necessary for Phase 3, as described in the Phasing Plan, shall be provided third; and 

 

dd. in any event, the construction of the municipal services for a subsequent phase Phase shall not commence prior to the owner having satisfied the requirements of Recommendation 10(b)1 through 10(b)3, inclusive;

 

5. the construction and maintenance, at the owner's expense, an area of not less than 2,348 square metres across the north side of Blocks 1 and 7, connecting Public Street "D" with Public Street "F," for use by the general public as Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space with the specific location, configuration, and design to be determined and secured in the context of Site Plan Approval to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

6. the construction and maintenance, at the owner's expense, an area of not less than 665 square metres at the south end of Block 7 near the intersection of Public Street "A" and Public Street "B," for use by the general public as Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space with the specific location, configuration, and design, and programming to be determined and secured in the context of Site Plan Approval to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

7. the construction and maintenance, at the owner's expense, an area of not less than 385 square metres at the southeast corner of Block 5 near the intersection of Kennedy Road and Sheppard Avenue East for use by the general public as Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space  with the specific location, configuration, and design to be determined and secured in the context of Site Plan Approval to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

8. the construction and maintenance, at the owner's expense, an area of not less than 2,366 square metres on the lands along the west side of Public Street "C," for use by the general public as Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space with the specific location, configuration, and design to be determined and secured in the context of Site Plan Approval for Block 3 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

9. as a pre-approval condition to Site Plan Approval for residential use on any block on the development site which includes a Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space as described in Recommendation 9a above, the Owner shall convey to the City, for nominal consideration, on terms set out in the Section 37 Agreement, easement(s) in favour of the City in perpetuity, including support rights as applicable, for public use of the Privately Owner Publicly Accessible Open Space, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Directory, City Planning and the City Solicitor;

 

10. the Development Charge Credits referred to in Recommendations 6, 7 and 8 above;

 

11. the design and construction of any Above Base Park Improvements to the new parks by the owner in exchange for the Development Charge Credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges;

 

12. prior to issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions for the first residential development of the lands the Owner shall produce Urban Design Guidelines to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division that will ensure a high quality public realm, address the incremental development of each phase and foster design excellence including innovative architecture and landscape design;

 

13. prior to the issuance of the first building permit for a residential use any part of the site, including permits for excavation and shoring, the owner shall enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with the City ("Contribution Agreement"), for the Affordable Housing Units that are approved for Open Door incentives, on terms satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor. The owner shall provide such Affordable Housing Units in accordance with such agreement(s);

 

14. the owner will construct and maintain the development of the site in accordance with Tier 1, Toronto Green Standard, and the owner will be encouraged to achieve Tier 2, Toronto Green Standard, or higher, where appropriate, consistent with the performance standards of Toronto Green Standards applicable at the time of the site plan application for each building on the site; and

 

15. the owner shall include warning clauses and signage of the Toronto Catholic District School Board and the Toronto District School Board in the conditions of site plan approval and subsequently within any agreements of purchase and sale or tenant lease agreements for the proposed units, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

11. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to negotiate and execute a municipal capital facility agreement (Contribution Agreement) with the owner for the provision of Open Door Incentives, for 272 affordable rental dwelling units at 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362  Kennedy Road to secure rents at or below 100 percent of the average rent by bedroom type in the City of Toronto, as reported by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in its most recent annual Rental Market Report, for a minimum period of 40 years, together with any security, financing or other documents required, as well as any amendments thereto required from time to time, on terms and conditions acceptable to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

12. City Council approve the provision of financial incentives pursuant to the City's Open Door Affordable Housing Program in relation to the Affordable Housing Units as follows:

 

a. City Council exempt the 272 affordable rental dwelling units at 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362  Kennedy Road from taxation for municipal and school purposes for the 40-year term of the municipal capital facility agreement; and

 

b. City Council exempt the 272 new affordable rental dwelling units at 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362  Kennedy Road from the payment of development charges, planning application fees, park dedication payments and building permits fees under existing City policy and with the exception of fees already paid.

 

13. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to execute, postpone, confirm the status of and discharge any City security documents registered with respect to the delivery of the affordable rental housing dwelling units as required by normal business practices.

 

14. City Council authorize City staff to cancel or refund any taxes paid pursuant to the by-law exempting the property from taxation if authority is given for an exemption from taxation as set out in Recommendation 12 above.

 

15. City Council require the Owner to enter into a financially secured Subdivision Agreement to secure  the construction of any necessary improvements to the municipal infrastructure arising from the review of the material referenced in Recommendation 6a. above to the satisfaction of  the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and General Manager, Toronto Water.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 26, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 4, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District and the Director, Housing Policy and Strategy, Housing Secretariat

Summary

This application proposes to amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 to permit the redevelopment of the lands located at 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362 Kennedy Road.

 

The subject lands currently contain the Agincourt Mall and are approximately 10.6 hectares in size. The subject applications are required to implement Site and Area Specific Policy 572 (SASP 572) adopted by City Council in 2018 which provides for the replacement of the existing mall with a new community that will include a new road network, residential, commercial, parks and community uses. The proposal would result in 4,372 dwelling units, 10,333 square metres of office space (2.8% of total floor area)  and 24,190 square metres of retail space (6.5% of total floor area) deployed in a number of mixed use buildings. The proposed total gross floor area of 371,325 square metres represents a density of approximately 3.5 times the lot area. A new 12,090 square metre public park is located at the west side of the site. A second park is located along Sheppard Avenue East and is 2,747 square metres in size. Four Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Spaces (POPS) have been proposed to expand and enhance the public realm, creating additional open spaces and pedestrian/cycling connections through the site.

 

Staff have negotiated a number of community benefits which are recommended to be secured in an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act. The community benefits include: 

  • 272 of the proposed units to be secured as affordable housing, representing 10% of the increased residential permissions or 6.2% of the total units. Open Door Affordable Rental Housing Program incentives would be applied to the units to extend the affordability period from 15 to 40 years;
  • a child care facility (62 child spaces) to be constructed in accordance with Children's Services requirements and conveyed to the City;
  • a 1,200 square metre community agency space; and
  • a financial contribution of $250,000 to establish a public art program for the site.

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020). It conforms to SASP 572, adding to the range and mix of residential units available in a compact form while maintaining a significant amount of non-residential space on the site. The redevelopment of the site from a mall with significant surface parking to a new neighbourhood is focused on public realm and pedestrian movement improvements. Further, the integration of significant retail and commercial uses into the new buildings insures these important functions continue to serve the broader community's day-to-day needs. Through the dedication of the parkland and securing of POPS space, the proposal creates a public realm around which the new complete community will emerge. Approval of the development would also secure a number of community benefits, outlined above, including a significant amount of new affordable housing units as provided for by Official Plan policies for sites greater than 5 hectares.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, subject to the Bills being held from enactment to allow for the Owner to enter into a Section 37 Agreement and finalize matters to the satisfaction of Engineering and Construction Services. This report also recommends the approval of financial incentives pursuant to the City's Open Door Affordable Housing Program.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 4, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 17 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District and the Director, Housing Policy and Strategy, Housing Secretariat - Final Report - 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362 Kennedy Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-172981.pdf
(November 5, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting

Speakers

Lindsay Dale-Harris, Applicant, Bousfields Inc.
Matthew Schuman, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, o.b.o Property Owner

Communications (Community Council)

(November 24, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (SC.New)
(November 25, 2021) Letter from Matthew Schuman (SC.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/sc/comm/communicationfile-140443.pdf

2a - Supplementary Report - 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362 Kennedy Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications

Origin
(November 25, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District
Summary

A Final Report dated November 4, 2021 was submitted by the Director, Community Planning to Scarborough Community Council and the Director, Housing Policy and Strategy, recommending approval of a comprehensive redevelopment of the lands at 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362 Kennedy Road. The proposal would allow for the replacement of the existing mall with a new community that will include a new road network, residential, commercial, parks and community uses. In addition to reviewing and recommending approval of the proposed applications, the report contained a number of recommendations related to the implementation of the proposed development, including recommending securing a number of community benefits via Section 37 of the Planning Act.  The required Section 37 Agreement also was intended to secure matters related to implementation as a legal convenience.

 

Since the submission of the Final Report, City Planning staff have had discussions with the applicant about implementation.  In the course of those discussions, it was determined that some of the recommended terms that would have been finalized through City Council adoption of the Final Report required additional clarity.  As such, this Supplementary Report proposes minor and technical refinements to the recommendations in the November 4, 2021 Final Report on the subject applications to allow for a clearer and more certain path to implementation.  City staff from various commenting Divisions and Legal Services have reviewed and assisted with the preparation of the refined recommendations contained herein.

 

City Planning therefore recommends that the recommendations of the Final Report as amended by the recommendations of this Supplementary Report be adopted.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 25, 2021) Supplementary report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District 3850 and 3900 Sheppard Avenue East and 2350 to 2362 Kennedy Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-173836.pdf

SC28.3 - Request for Directions Report - 1891 Eglinton Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with appropriate staff and/or external consultants as may be appropriate, to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal hearing to oppose the applicant's appeals respecting the Official Plan Amendment application (Application 20 158264 ESC 20 OZ) and Zoning By-law Amendment application (Application 20 224755 ESC 20 OZ) for the lands at 1891 Eglinton Avenue East, for the reasons contained in the report (November 3, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve the outstanding issues detailed in the report dated November 3, 2021, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, and to support a revised proposal that is generally consistent with Official Plan Amendment 499 ("OPA 499") for the lands at 1891 Eglinton Avenue East, and report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary.

 

3. City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the owner of the subject lands to address the preliminary issues related to infrastructure required to support the anticipated growth in the overall context of the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area, including streets, density, servicing, parks, and community service facilities which are to be assessed comprehensively, including coordination with other Golden Mile Secondary Plan area landowners.

 

4. City Council, in the event the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the subject appeal in whole or in part,  direct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Land Tribunal to withhold the issuance of any Order on the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment appeals for the subject lands until such time as the Ontario Land Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment are in a form and with content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

The Official Plan Amendment application (Application No. 20 158264 ESC 20 OZ) proposes to amend the Official Plan to add a Site and Area-Specific Policy ("SASP"). The Zoning By-law Amendment application (Application No. 20 224755 ESC 20 OZ) proposes to amend the City of Scarborough Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982 to permit the redevelopment of the northerly (2.9-hectare) portion of the lands at 1891 Eglinton Avenue East, which is designated Mixed Use Areas in the Official Plan. The southerly portion of the site designated General Employment Areas in the Official Plan is not included in these applications. See Attachment No. 2 – Official Plan Land Use Map (Pre-OPA 499), Attachment No. 3 – Official Plan Land Use Map (OPA 499) and Attachment No. 4 – Existing Zoning.

 

The proposal consists of four development blocks, including one block for public parkland and three new public streets. Five buildings are proposed with heights that range from 10 to 48-storeys. The existing one-storey industrial building would be demolished to accommodate the proposal.

 

The subject lands are located within the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area ("GMSP area") approved through Official Plan Amendment No. 499 ("OPA 499"), and are also subject to new Golden Mile Urban Design Guidelines, as adopted by City Council on October 30, 2020.

 

The Official Plan Amendment application was submitted and deemed complete June 19, 2020. The Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted and deemed complete December 3, 2020. Both applications have been appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") citing City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act. The appeals were filed on April 14, 2021.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction for the City Solicitor, together with appropriate City staff and/or external consultants, to attend the OLT hearing to oppose the subject applications. City staff have concerns with the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and are of the opinion the proposed amendments, in their current form are not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) ("PPS"), do not conform with the A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) ("Growth Plan (2020)"), and are not consistent with the general intent of and fail to conform with the Official Plan. Further the proposed amendments are not supportable, in their current form, in the context of OPA 499 and are not consistent with the general intent or conform to OPA 499. Reasons for City staff position are outlined in detail in this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 8 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Request for Directions Report - 1891 Eglinton Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-172820.pdf

SC28.5 - Preliminary Report - 2240 Birchmount Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - Scarborough - Agincourt

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct staff to conduct an area (land use) study and evaluate this application in the context of other potential development sites and existing development on lands fronting the south side of Sheppard Avenue East and the west side of Birchmount Road as bounded by Amethyst Road to the west and Cass Avenue to the south.

 

2. City Council direct staff to determine, based on the area land use study undertaken in accordance with Recommendation 1 above, whether amending the Official Plan and/or zoning by-law with area specific measures is appropriate for all or part of this area.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council:

 

1. Directed staff to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application located at 2240 Birchmount Road together with the Ward Councillor.

 

2. Directed staff to provide notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the application site, and to additional residents, institutions and owners to be determined in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with any additional mailing costs to be borne by the applicant.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This report provides information and identifies a preliminary set of issues regarding the application located at 2240 Birchmount Road. The applicant is proposing a 9-storey, 152 unit midrise residential apartment building. Commercial uses are contemplated on the ground floor.

 

Staff are currently reviewing the application. It has been circulated to all appropriate agencies and City divisions for comment. Staff will proceed to schedule a community consultation meeting for the application with the Ward Councillor.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1 to 7 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Preliminary Report - 2240 Birchmount Road - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-172762.pdf

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 29

TE29.1 - Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Located to the West of 96 Spadina Avenue and to the East of 379 Adelaide Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1044 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the public lane to the west of 96 Spadina Avenue and to the east of 379 Adelaide Street West (the "Lane"), as shown as Part 1 on PLAN 66R-32043, attached as Appendix A to the report (November 3, 2021), from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

 

2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix B to the report (November 3, 2021), from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program Transportation Services

Summary

As this report proposes permanently closing a portion of a public highway, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services recommends that the public lane located to the west of 96 Spadina Avenue and to the east of 379 Adelaide Street West, labelled as Part 1 in Plan 66R-32043 in Appendix "A", be permanently closed. Once closed, the lane will be sold to the adjacent property owner, 379 Adelaide Street West Inc.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program Transportation Services - Permanent Closure of the Public Lane Located to the West of 96 Spadina Avenue and to the East of 379 Adelaide Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172879.pdf

TE29.2 - Permanent Closure of the East-West Portion of Guest Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York
Attention
Bill 1036 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the permanent closure of the east-west portion of Guest Avenue, designated as Part 2 on Sketch No. PS-2021-0023 and containing a land area of 344.3 m2 (the "Highway"), attached to the report (November 3, 2021), from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

 

2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law, provided as Attachment 1 to the report (November 3, 2021), from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services.

 

3. City Council direct that the confidential information in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it pertains to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto.

 

4. City Council receive the supplementary report (November 22, 2021) from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program, Transportation Services, for information.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program Transportation Services

Summary

As this report proposes permanently closing a portion of a public highway, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services recommends that the east-west portion of Guest Avenue be permanently closed and sold to Marlin Springs Limited Partnership and Dandaw Developments Limited (the "Applicant"). Part 1 on the Sketch will remain as public highway, Guest Avenue.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program Transportation Services - Permanent Closure of the East-West Portion of Guest Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172890.pdf
(November 4, 2021) Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information

Speakers

Tabby Nassiri, Development Manager, Marlin Spring

2a - Permanent Closure of the East-West Portion of Guest Avenue - Supplementary Report

Origin
(November 22, 2021) Report from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program Transportation Services
Summary

Further to item TE29.2 "Permanent Closure of the East-West Portion of Guest Avenue" this report provides an update on City's Real Estate Disposal process.

 

The east-west portion of Guest Avenue, shown as Part 2 on Sketch No. PS-2021-0023, (the "Highway") has been declared surplus by the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services.   Further, the General Manager, Transportation Services been authorized to give notice to the public of a proposed by-law to permanently close the Highway in accordance with the requirements of City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 162, and advise the public of the proposed closure in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for Schedule "A+" activities.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 22, 2021) Supplementary Report and Attachment from the Director, Transportation Planning and Capital Program Transportation Services - Permanent Closure of the East-West Portion of Guest Avenue - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173606.pdf

TE29.3 - 700 University Avenue - Zoning Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE29.3a with recommendations).

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested staff to continue to work with the applicant prior to City Council to resolve outstanding concerns respecting  the community benefits set out in Recommendation 3 in the report (November 3, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, including but not limited to, Recommendation 3.a., regarding the re-allocation of $8,250,000 in S.37 contributions towards maximizing on-site affordable housing, and Recommendation 3.b., regarding securing additional measures to address noise and dust impacts from construction onto the adjacent public school to address any health and safety concern and any costs associated with abatement for dust or noise for the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) both inside the school and to the adjacent school yard; and to report directly to the December 15 and 16, 2021 meeting of City Council on their findings.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 24, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes a vertical 5-storey (25 metre) addition on the existing 19-storey office building known as the Ontario Hydro Building, and a 56-storey (196 metre) rental residential building on the south-west corner of the site. The proposal also includes changes to the existing sunken forecourt, which currently occupies a large area at the intersection of College Street and University Avenue. A total of 499 vehicle parking spaces, of which 488 would be located off-site at 40 Murray Street, are proposed as part of the application.  A total of 664 bicycle parking spaces (111 short-term and 611 long-term spaces) are also proposed. Vehicular access to a 1-level underground garage would be provided from Orde Street at the south-west corner of the site.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020), and conforms with the Toronto Official Plan and the Downtown Secondary Plan.

 

The proposal presents an appropriate built form and contribution to the public realm that is compatible with the surrounding context. It has been revised, since its initial submission, to reduce the impact on the public realm by reducing its proposed height and addressing separation distance concerns from the south and west lot lines. This report reviews and recommends approval of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 700 University Avenue - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172886.pdf
(November 23, 2021) Attachment 5: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (569-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173704.pdf
(November 23, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173705.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 7, 2021) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 700 University Avenue - Zoning Amendment (TE29.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174238.pdf

Speakers

Andreya Padmore, Teacher, accompanied by 6 students from Orde Street School

Communications (Community Council)

(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Sole Fernandez (TE.Supp)
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Supp)
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Daryl Sage, Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Lands Corporation (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/comm/communicationfile-140316.pdf
(November 23, 2021) Letter from Tom Giancos, Senior Vice President, Kingsett Capital (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/comm/communicationfile-140330.pdf

TE29.4 - 212-218 Dundas Street East and 279 1/2 George Street - Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 212-218 Dundas Street East and 279 1/2 George Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (October 28, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District .

 

2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 212-218 Dundas Street East and 279 1/2 George Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (October 28, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3. City Council authorizes the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4. Before introducing the necessary Bills contemplated in Recommendations 1 and 2 above to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:

 

a. enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, and any other necessary agreements, satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor securing the matters identified in Recommendations 5 to 6 at the owner's expense, with such Agreement(s) to be registered on title to the lands at 212-218 Dundas Street East and 279 1/2 George Street in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor;

 

b. Submit a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, revised Servicing Groundwater Summary, a revised Hydrological Review Summary, and revised Architectural plans to show that the required Jelly Fish filter can be accommodated within the site, for review and acceptance by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

c. Pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing report, as accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, should it be determined that upgrades to such infrastructure are required to support this development;

 

d. Withdraw its appeals to Official Plan Amendment 352, being the Downtown Tall Buildings Setback Area Specific Policy and the associated Zoning By-laws 1106-2016 and 1107-2016, as they relate to the subject lands; and

 

e. Withdraw its appeal of Garden District Heritage Conservation District and Garden District Heritage Conservation District Plan;

 

f. Withdraw its appeal of the Priority Retail Streets City-initiated Zoning By-law Amendments 1681-2019 and 1682-2019.

 

5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council direct that the owner be required to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following community benefits at the owner's expense, as follows:

 

a. the owner shall provide community benefits having a value to be determined and be allocated at the discretion, and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councilor;  

 

b. the cash contribution referred to in Recommendation 5.a. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Table 18-10-0135-01, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Agreement to the date of payment;

 

c. in the event the cash contribution referred to in Recommendations 5.a. above has not been used for the determined purpose within three years of the amending Zoning By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided the purpose is identified in the Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands

 

6. City Council also direct that the following be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to secure matters required to support the development:

 

a. The owner shall continue to provide and maintain the ten (10) existing rental dwelling units on the lands at 279 1/2 George Street as rental housing, together with the associated facilities and amenities of the existing rental apartment building, for a period of at least 20 years commencing from the date that the Zoning By-laws come into force and effect, and with no applications for demolition or conversion from residential rental use during such 20 year period, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.

 

b. The owner shall undertake improvements to the existing rental apartment building, taking into account tenant responses to the required Tenant Survey related to programming of amenity space, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or their designate, including, but not limited to, the following:

 

Prior to the first above-grade building permit for any part of the development:

 

i. Improvements to the existing waste management facilities including storage of garbage, recycling and composting;

 

ii. Accessibility improvements within the existing rental apartment building, including push button automatic door openers for all common doors, where possible, and an accessible clothes folding table within the laundry room;

 

iii. Improvements to the laundry room within the existing residential rental building;

 

iv. Short-term bicycle parking near the front entrance of the existing residential rental building;

 

v. Improvements and repairs to the existing ten (10) rental units,with repairs and improvements to be determined through the site plan application review process and secured in a Site Plan Agreement;

 

vi. Improvements to the existing outdoor or new outdoor amenity ares, to be shared amongst residents of the existing rental apartment building, with programming of a similar nature to be determined through the site plan application review process and secured in a Site Plan Agreement

 

c. The costs of all improvements to the existing rental apartment building and associated spaces, both within and outside the building, as described above, shall not be passed on to tenants of the existing building in any form, including by way of an application to the Ontario Landlord Tenant Board or to any successor tribunal with jurisdiction to hear applications made under the legislation governing residential tenancies in Ontario, for the purpose of obtaining an increase in residential rent above the applicable guideline;

 

d. Prior to Site Plan Approval for the development the owner agrees to develop a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Plan to mitigate the impacts of construction on existing tenants, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;,

 

e. The owner shall provide a minimum of 10-percent of all new units in the proposed 41-storey  building as 3-bedroom units;

 

f. The owner shall provide a minimum of 15-percent of all new units in the proposed 41-storey building as 2-bedroom units;

 

g. The owner shall provide a minimum of 15-percent of all new units in the proposed 41-storey building as 2 and/or 3 bedroom units or units that can be converted to 2 and 3 bedroom units through the use of accessible or adaptable design measures;

 

h. as part of a site plan application for the lands, the owner shall, at its sole expense, submit detailed landscape plans, sections, and details with sufficient information to assure Urban Forestry that the required City tree plantings and associated soil volumes and soil infrastructure is feasible;

 

i. wind mitigation and privacy measures, such as a 1.8 m high perimeter wind screen and/or raised planters, shall be provided along the perimeter of the outdoor amenity area where necessary to protect adjacent properties and residents;

 

j. prior to final Site Plan Approval for any part of the site, the owner shall submit a construction management plan for the development with the general matters included in the Section 37 Agreement, including but not limited to, noise, dust, size and location of staging areas, location and function of gates, dates of significant concrete pouring, lighting details, vehicular parking and queuing locations, street closures, coordination with adjacent on-going development construction, parking and laneway uses and access, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and a communication strategy with the surrounding community, and any other matters requested by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

k. the owner will construct and maintain the development of the site in accordance with Tier 1, Toronto Green Standard, and the owner will be encouraged to achieve Tier 2 Toronto Green Standard, or higher, where appropriate, consistent with the performance standards of Toronto Green Standards applicable at the time of the site plan application for each building on the site.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 24, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(October 28, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-laws to permit a 41 storey mixed use development including ground floor commercial uses and 490 dwelling units with a total gross floor area of 32,023 square metres at 212-218 Dundas Street East and 279 1/2 George Street. The proposed building would have a height of 133.2 metres including the mechanical penthouse. The proposal would entail the retention, in-situ, of the 10 rental dwelling units contained within the existing 3-storey rental apartment building at 279 1/2 George Street.

 

The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with the A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020) and conforms to the City's Official Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law, both by-laws 438-86 and 569-13. The proposal is in keeping with the intent of the Toronto Official Plan, particularly as it relates to intensification in the Downtown, which is a designated growth area, in the form of a tall building which conforms to the site specific provisions of Official Plan Amendment 82, the Downtown Plan and generally conforms with the guidelines. Staff worked with the applicant and the community to address and resolve various massing issues including appropriate tower and podium heights and heritage impacts. The provision of a range of dwelling unit types will help address housing issues. Staff recommend that Council support approval of the zoning by-law amendment application

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 28, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-4 and 7-12 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 212-218 Dundas Street East and 279 1/2 George Street - Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172918.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172919.pdf
(November 22, 2021) Attachment 6: Draft 569-2013 Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173529.pdf
(November 22, 2021) Attachment 5: Draft 438-86 Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173591.pdf

Speakers

Michael Goldberg, Goldberg Group

Communications (Community Council)

(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Supp)

TE29.5 - 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Rental Housing Conversion Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Bill 980 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to this report (November 3, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

 

3. City Council approve the Rental Housing Conversion application (20 233836 STE 13 RH) under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to sever the residential rental property containing eight (8) rental dwelling units at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue into three separate properties, each containing fewer than six (6) rental dwelling units, subject to the following conditions:

 

a. The owner shall apply for, and obtain approval for a Consent from the Committee of Adjustment or the Toronto Local Appeal Body, if applicable, to permit the severance of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue into three separate properties for the purposes of conveying each of the properties to qualified non-profit housing providers as part of the Tenants First Initiative.

 

b. The owner of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street shall continue to provide and maintain two (2) rental dwelling units, including one (1) studio rental unit and one (1) one-bedroom rental unit, as social housing units and sixteen (16) dwelling rooms as social housing dwelling rooms for a period of at least 99 years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Official permitting the severance of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue, subject to a social housing program described in Section 453.1 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 ("social housing"). During such 99-year period, no social housing unit or dwelling room shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership housing that provides a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit or dwelling room, including life-lease or co-ownership, and no application shall be made to demolish or convert any social housing unit or dwelling room to a non-residential rental purpose without replacement of same. The two (2) social housing units and sixteen (16) social housing dwelling rooms at 230-232 Carlton Street shall continue to be provided and maintained to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

c.  The owner of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street shall continue to provide the two (2) social housing units and sixteen (16) social housing dwelling rooms required in Recommendation 3.a above at rents-geared-to-income for a period of at least 25 years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Official permitting the severance of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue is final and binding, subject to the continued provision of funding from federal, provincial, and/or municipal government programs;

 

d. The owner of the lands at 33 Aberdeen Avenue shall continue to provide and maintain two (2) rental dwelling units, including one (1) one-bedroom rental unit and one (1) three-bedroom rental unit, as social housing units for a period of at least 99 years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Official permitting the severance of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue, subject to a social housing program described in Section 453.1 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 ("social housing"). During such 99-year period, no social housing unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership housing that provides a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, including life-lease or co-ownership, and no application shall be made to demolish or convert any social housing unit to a non-residential rental purpose without replacement of the same. The two (2) social housing units at 33 Aberdeen Avenue shall continue to be provided and maintained to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

e. The owner of the lands at 33 Aberdeen Avenue shall continue to provide the two (2) social housing units required in Recommendation 3.c above at rents-geared-to-income for a period of at least 25 years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Official permitting the severance of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue, subject to the continued provision of funding from federal, provincial, and/or municipal government programs;

 

f. The owner of the lands at 39 Aberdeen Avenue shall continue to provide and maintain four (4) rental dwelling units, including two (2) one-bedroom rental units and two (2) two-bedroom rental units, as social housing units for a period of at least 99 years from the date of issuance of the Certificate of Official permitting the severance of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue, subject to a social housing program described in Section 453.1 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 ("social housing"). During such 99-year period, no social housing unit shall be registered as a condominium or any other form of ownership housing that provides a right to exclusive possession of a dwelling unit, including life-lease or co-ownership, and no application shall be made to demolish or convert any social housing unit to a non-residential rental purpose without replacement of the same. The four (4) social housing units at 39 Aberdeen Avenue shall continue to be provided and maintained to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

g. The owner of the lands at 39 Aberdeen Avenue shall continue to provide the four (4) social housing units required in Recommendation 3.e above at rents-geared-to-income for a period of at least 25 years from the date that the severance of the lands at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue is final and binding, subject to the continued provision of funding from federal, provincial, and/or municipal government programs;

 

h. The owner shall enter into, and register on title to the lands at each of 230-232 Carlton Street, 33 Aberdeen Avenue, and 39 Aberdeen Avenue, agreements pursuant to Section 111 and 453.1 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 3.a. to 3.f. above, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

4. City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to issue Preliminary Approval of the application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the severance of the residential rental property at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue after all of the following have occurred:

 

a. the conditions in Recommendation 3 above have been fully satisfied and secured;

 

b. the severance is final and binding; and

 

c. the execution and registration on title of agreements pursuant to Sections 111 and 453.1 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 for 230-232 Carlton Street, 33 Aberdeen Avenue, and 39 Aberdeen Avenue respectively, securing the conditions in Recommendation 3 above.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 24, 2021 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) is proposing to amend the Official Plan and requesting approval under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code to permit the severance of the existing social housing property at 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue into three separate properties that would be conveyed to qualified non-profit housing agencies as part of the Tenants First initiative. All eight existing rental dwelling units and all 16 existing dwelling rooms would continue to be provided and maintained by future owners as social housing with rents-geared-to-income. There will be no changes to the existing tenancies, and tenants will continue to reserve their existing rights under the Residential Tenancies Act, 2006.    

 

The proposal is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (2020) and conforms with A Place to Grow: Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe (2020).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and the Rental Housing Conversion application under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code in order to implement the City's Tenants First Initiative.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 230-232 Carlton Street and 33 and 39 Aberdeen Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Rental Housing Conversion Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172767.pdf
(November 3, 2021) Notice of Public Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172772.pdf

TE29.6 - 1375 Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park

Confidential Attachment - Contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and contains information regarding potential litigation

Community Council Recommendations

The The Toronto and East York Community Council recommend that:

 

1. City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor and Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor and Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, if adopted by City Council.

 

3. City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 2, 2021) from the City Solicitor and Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, is to remain confidential, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.

Origin

(November 2, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor and Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On March 11, 2020, a Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted for the property at 1375 Queen Street West (the "Site"), proposing to amend Zoning By-laws 569-2013 and 438-86 to permit the construction of a new eight-storey mixed-use building with an overall height of 31.65 metres, including the mechanical penthouse (the "Original Proposal").  The Original Proposal included 46 new residential units and approximately 448 square metres of retail space on the ground floor.  The total gross floor area of the proposed building was approximately 3,546 square metres representing a FSI of 5.97 times the area of the lot.

 

The Original Proposal was deemed complete on July 8, 2020.  The application was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "OLT") on November 19, 2020 due to the City's failure to make a decision within the prescribed time period set out in the Planning Act.  The OLT conducted one Casement Management Conference on Tuesday, May 18, 2021 and has now scheduled a one-week hearing commencing on Monday, November 29, 2021.

 

The applicant has subsequently made a with prejudice settlement offer to the City by way of the with prejudice letter dated October 29, 2021 (Public Appendix A) and revised plans (Public Appendix B), ("the Settlement Offer"), that will expire at the close of the December 15-16, 2021 City Council meeting.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions on the Settlement Offer for the OLT hearing that is scheduled to commence of November 29, 2021.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 2, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor and Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1375 Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment - Request for Directions Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172775.pdf
Public Appendix "A" - Correspondence from Goodmans LLP, dated October 29, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172776.pdf
Public Appendix "B" - Architectural Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172777.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Recommendations and Confidential Information

Speakers

Ric Amis

Communications (Community Council)

(November 12, 2021) Letter from Ric Amis, West Side Community Council Secretary/Chair, Parkdale Residents Association (TE.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/comm/communicationfile-139984.pdf

TE29.7 - 234-250 King Street East and 162 Princess Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the lands at 234-250 King Street East and 162 Princess Street for the reasons set out in the report (November 3, 2021) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and to continue discussions with the owner in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.

 

2. In the event that the Ontario Land Tribunal allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final order be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that:

 

a. the draft Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;

 

b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the Zoning By-law Amendment application, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

c. the owner has submitted a Revised Heritage Impact Assessment that includes a conservation strategy for the on-site significant heritage resources to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;

 

d. if the properties at 234-236, 240 and 242 King Street East are designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, the owner has entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 234-236, 240 and 242 King Street East, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning including execution and registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

e. the owner provides a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is substantially in accordance with the conservation strategy set out in the Revised Heritage Impact Assessment required by recommendation 2.c. above, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning;

 

f. the owner has entered into, and registered on title to the lands, an agreement with the City pursuant to section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing community benefits and other matters in support of the development; and

 

g. the owner withdraw its appeal of Official Plan Amendment 525, being the King-Parliament Secondary Plan, and the associated Zoning By-law 393-2021, as they relate to the subject lands.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On December 22, 2020, a Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted to permit a 40-storey (132.9 metres tall including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with ground floor retail uses and 514 residential dwelling units at 234-250 King Street East and 162 Princess Street. The Zoning By-law Amendment application was deemed complete on January 21, 2021.

 

On July 14, 2021, the applicant appealed the applications to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision within the time frame under the Planning Act.

 

This report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 234-250 King Street East and 162 Princess Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172889.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Kim Atkins (TE.Supp)

TE29.8 - 429-455 Richmond Street East and 69-75 Ontario Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Land Tribunal in opposition to the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal for the lands at 429-455 Richmond Street East and 69-75 Ontario Street and to continue discussions with the owner in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues.

 

2. Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the issuance of any final Order(s) be withheld until such time as the City Solicitor advises that:

 

a. the final form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendments are to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor;

 

b. the owner has addressed all outstanding issues raised by Parks, Forestry and Recreation as they relate to a parkland dedication, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor;

 

c. the owner has submitted a Transportation Demand Management plan, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services;

 

d. the owner has submitted a revised pedestrian level wind study to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, with any required wind mitigation measures implemented through the Site Plan Approval process to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

e. the owner has submitted revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management, Hydrogeological and Geotechnical Reports, and any other related engineering reports and drawings, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and has agreed that the design and implementation of municipal infrastructure will be at the owner’s sole cost and expense for any upgrades or improvements to City infrastructure identified in the approved Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management, Hydrogeological and/or Geotechnical Reports, with such improvements being secured to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and

 

f. the owner has entered into and registered on title to the lands, an agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, securing community benefits and other matters in support of the development.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.

Origin

(November 2, 2021) Report from Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted on December 31, 2019, and was deemed complete on January 28, 2020. The current application proposes to permit a 38-storey (128.5 metres including the mechanical penthouse), 21,653 square metre mixed-use building containing 354 dwelling units, 394 square metres of retail space, 357 bike spaces and 76 vehicle parking spaces at 429-455 Richmond Street East and 69-75 Ontario Street.

 

On April 1, 2021, the applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT") due to Council not making a decision within the 120-day time frame under the Planning Act.

 

This report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 2, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 429-455 Richmond Street East and 69-75 Ontario Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172727.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 22, 2021) E-mail from M. Domovitch (TE.Supp)
(November 23, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Supp)

TE29.9 - 212 Dundas Street East - Alterations to a Heritage Property Designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

  

1. City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 212 Dundas Street East, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a 41-storey plus mechanical penthouse tower on the lands known municipally in the year 2021 as 212-218 Dundas Street East, including 275 George Street and 279½ George Street with such alterations substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated October 4, 2021, prepared by Giannone Petricone Associates and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by GBCA Architects, dated June 25, 2021 and on file with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a. That the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

b. That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the subject owner shall:

 

1. Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Assessment for 212 Dundas Street East prepared by GBCA Architects, dated June 25, 2021, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

c. That prior to Site Plan approval for the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council for the properties located at 212 Dundas Street East, the subject owner shall:

 

1. Provide final Site Plan drawings substantially in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.1 above to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

2. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment required for the subject property, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

 

3. Provide a Heritage Lighting Plan that describes how the exterior of the subject heritage property will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

4. Provide a detailed Landscape Plan for the subject property, satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

5. Provide an Interpretation Plan for the subject property, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

6. Submit a Signage Plan for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

d. That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 212 Dundas Street East, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works for the existing heritage building, as are acceptable to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner of the subject property shall:

 

1. Have obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment, such Amendment to have come into full force and effect.

 

2. Provide building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan required in Recommendation 1.b.1 above including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

3. Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan.

 

4. Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

e. That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.d.3 above, the owner shall:

 

1. Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the Conservation Plan and Interpretation Plan and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning.

Origin

(October 21, 2021) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the Wilton Court Hotel and Henry Tasker House at 212 Dundas Street East (designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Garden District Heritage Conservation District) in connection with the development of the subject property.

 

The development application proposed a 41-storey plus mechanical penthouse tower that incorporates retained portions of the Wilton Court Hotel and Henry Tasker House as part of the base building and includes a new base building along Dundas Street East. The retained portions of the Wilton Court Hotel and Henry Tasker House are proposed to be restored. The proposed alterations conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage buildings as well as the Garden District Heritage Conservation District and the proposal is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 21, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - 212 Dundas Street East - Alterations to a Heritage Property Designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172805.pdf

9a - 212 Dundas Street East - Alterations to a Heritage Property Designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act

Origin
(November 17, 2021) Letter from Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

At its meeting on November 17, 2021, the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB28.2 and made recommendations to City Council.

 

Summary from the report (October 21, 2021) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:

 

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the Wilton Court Hotel and Henry Tasker House at 212 Dundas Street East (designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Garden District Heritage Conservation District) in connection with the development of the subject property.

 

The development application proposed a 41-storey plus mechanical penthouse tower that incorporates retained portions of the Wilton Court Hotel and Henry Tasker House as part of the base building and includes a new base building along Dundas Street East. The retained portions of the Wilton Court Hotel and Henry Tasker House are proposed to be restored. The proposed alterations conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage buildings as well as the Garden District Heritage Conservation District and the proposal is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - 212 Dundas Street East - Alterations to a Heritage Property Designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173672.pdf

TE29.10 - Proposed Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council state its intention to propose an amendment to By-Law 820-2021 dated October 4, 2021 to correct the legal description of the properties in accordance with Section 30.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 

 

2.  City Council provide notice of the proposed amendment to By-Law 820-2021 to the owner(s) of the designated properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue in accordance with Sections 30.1(3) and 30.1(4) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.  If there are no objections to the proposed amendment in accordance with Section 30.1(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council to amend By-Law 820-2021.

Origin

(November 1, 2021) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to propose an amendment to City of Toronto By-law 820-2021, designating the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue as being of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to correct the legal description of the properties pursuant to Section 30.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

By-Law 820-2021 designates the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue, which contains a pair of single-storey semi-detached house form buildings that were among the 16 pairs of workers' cottages completed in 1858 on the subdivision developed by solicitor and realtor James Lukin Robinson on the former Military Reserve lands east of Garrison Creek that were also known as the Garrison Common.  Schedule B to By-Law 820-2021 includes an incorrect legal description of the property that was brought to City staff's attention.  The proposed amendment to the by-law would correct the legal description of the properties. This amendment will have no impact on the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) in the original report to City Council recommending the property's designation.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 1, 2021) Report from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning - Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172904.pdf

10a - Proposed Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue

Origin
(November 17, 2021) Report from Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

At its meeting on November 17, 2021, the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item PB28.6 and made recommendations to City Council. 

 

Summary from the report (November 1, 2021) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:

 

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to propose an amendment to City of Toronto By-law 820-2021, designating the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue as being of cultural heritage value or interest under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to correct the legal description of the properties pursuant to Section 30.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

By-Law 820-2021 designates the properties at 40-44 Mitchell Avenue, which contains a pair of single-storey semi-detached house form buildings that were among the 16 pairs of workers' cottages completed in 1858 on the subdivision developed by solicitor and realtor James Lukin Robinson on the former Military Reserve lands east of Garrison Creek that were also known as the Garrison Common.  Schedule B to By-Law 820-2021 includes an incorrect legal description of the property that was brought to City staff's attention.  The proposed amendment to the bylaw would correct the legal description of the properties. This amendment will have no impact on the Statement of Significance (Reasons for Designation) in the original report to City Council recommending the property's designation.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 17, 2021) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Proposed Amendment of Designating By-law to Correct Legal Description - 40-44 Mitchell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173651.pdf

TE29.12 - Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 157 Brookside Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 157 Brookside Avenue.

Origin

(October 19, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 157 Brookside Avenue. The application indicates the reason for removal is to construct a parking pad.

 

The subject tree is a Colorado blue spruce (Picea pungens), measuring 39 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 19, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry - Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 157 Brookside Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172877.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 19, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Supp)

TE29.13 - Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 108 Watson Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 108 Watson Avenue.

Origin

(October 19, 2021) Report from Acting Director, Urban Forestry

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 108 Watson Avenue. The application indicates the reason for removal is due to limited growing space, the condition of the tree, and to provide access for planned renovations to the basement and front porch.

 

The subject tree is a Colorado blue spruce (Picea pungens), measuring 14 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 19, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry - Application to Remove a City-Owned Tree - 108 Watson Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172913.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 19, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Supp)

TE29.14 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 81 Walnut Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 81 Walnut Avenue.

Origin

(October 19, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located at 81 Walnut Avenue. The application indicates the reason for removal is that the tree is too large for the property and affects the enjoyment of their yard.

 

The subject tree is a Colorado blue spruce (Picea pungens), measuring 42 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 19, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 81 Walnut Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172915.pdf

Speakers

Allan Gordon

Communications (Community Council)

(November 19, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Supp)

TE29.15 - Application to Remove Private Tree - 204 Douglas Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

                                                                                                                      

1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located on the boundary line between 204 Douglas Drive and 64 St Andrews Gardens.

Origin

(October 19, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located on the boundary line between 204 Douglas Drive and 64 St Andrews Gardens. The application indicates the reason for removal is due to concerns that the tree's roots are causing structural damage to the hardscape; sewage pipes and foundation of 64 St Andrews Gardens; the main stem is in conflict with a fence; there is potential for large branch failure due to included bark; and that falling walnuts make the backyard unusable from June to October.

 

The subject tree is a black walnut tree (Juglans nigra), measuring 71.5 cm in diameter. The Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 19, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Acting Director, Urban Forestry - Application to Remove Private Tree - 204 Douglas Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172911.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 19, 2021) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (TE.Supp)
(November 20, 2021) E-mail from Marilyn Denis and James Helman (TE.Supp)

TE29.17 - Transit Oriented Communities Update (Preliminary Report)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
10 - Spadina - Fort York, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE29.17a for information).

Item will be considered after Member Motions on Thursday, December 16th

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the Director, Transportation Planning to implement the recommended public engagement approach outlined in the report (November 24, 2021) from the Director, Transportation Planning for future Transit Oriented Communities proposals, subject to any Provincial requirements for confidentiality.

 

2. City Council direct the Director, Transportation Planning to report to the appropriate Community Council on preliminary reviews of future Transit Oriented Communities proposals.

 

3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Executive Committee on the final assessment of each current and future Transit Oriented Communities proposal and the related implementing framework and/or agreements.

 

4. City Council request the City Manager to include the Acting General Manager, Economic Development on the city staff team reviewing the East Harbour Transit Oriented Communities proposal.
 

5. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the Director of Strategic  Initiatives Policy and Analysis, be included on the city staff team reviewing the East Harbour Transit Oriented Communities  proposal.

 

6. City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to convene a meeting, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with the Toronto Youth Cabinet to review the East Harbour Transit Oriented Communities proposal with the relevant City Staff.
 

7. City Council request that going forward, a minimum of thirty percent of all the new housing in Transit Oriented Communitys in Toronto be affordable; and that the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat; the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District; and, the Executive Director, Transit Expansion, make affordable housing a key priority in all negotiations with the Province and its agencies.
 

8. City Council direct the appropriate Planning staff working on the Employment Conversion requests for the Municipal Comprehensive Review to:
 

a. hold a meeting, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, on the East Harbour Transit Oriented Communities proposal which would also include materials outlining the existing zoning and current approvals as well as  the contribution of core employment lands to Toronto's economic viability and maintenance and creation of and development high value-added jobs; and to confirm the details in a report back to the January 6, 2022 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council;

 

b. convene a meeting, in conjunction with the Ward Councillor,  with any public members of the Infrastructure Ontario/Cadillac Fairview led Local Advisory Committee who are interested in reviewing the East Harbour Transit Oriented Communities proposal.

 

c. in addition to Part 8.a. above, create a city-led local working group , in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to review the East Harbour Transit Oriented Communities proposal from a City Planning Policy perspective.

 

9. City Council endorse and request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to give consideration to the advice from the King-Bathurst Local Advisory Committee, and the proposal that Infrastructure Ontario should satisfy the parkland dedication requirement for the King-Bathurst Transit Oriented Communities by acquiring the private surface parking lot adjacent to Victoria Memorial Square Park and conveying it to the City to expand the existing park, as outlined in the Memo from Parks, Forestry and Recreation to the Director, Community Planning, South District, dated July 28, 2021 in the submission from Councillor Cressy (under Background Information).

 

10. In the absence of a formal planning application and associated fees for Transit Oriented Communities proposals, City Council direct the City Manager to negotiate and execute a resource agreement to support a dedicated team of City staff for a period of 5 years to advance City interests in the provincial Transit Oriented Communities Program, and to manage both initial negotiations and the longer term planning review and approvals process.

 

11. City Council request the Province of Ontario and Infrastructure Ontario to support the sustained calls from the City-led First Parliament Working Group and Local Advisory Committee for the Ontario Line Corktown station to increase the amount of parkland onsite, invest in public realm improvements, and other community benefits as outlined in the Council-approved First Parliament Master Plan. 

 

12. City Council request Infrastructure Ontario and Metrolinx to immediately work with the City Planning, the Ward Councillor and area stakeholders to establish the Queen Station and Moss Park Station working groups to address area concerns about the traffic and construction impact caused by long-term road occupancy, deferred City capital projects and financial impact, loss of trees and landscaping, disruption to City service, compensation caused by loss of revenue to business owners, long-term road occupancy and other related matters. 

 

13. City Council direct the Executive Director, Transit Expansion Office, in consultation with the appropriate City divisions, to create an Equity Impact Assessment and Community Benefits Proposal in consultation with relevant stakeholders and to report back to the January 26, 2022 Executive Committee meeting.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Transit Expansion Office, to report directly to the December 15 and 16, 2021 City Council meeting on the significant investment being made by the City to the East Harbour Transit Hub through the SmartTrack program, identified in the report November 24, 2022) from the Director, Transportation Planning.

Origin

(November 24, 2021) Report from the Director, Transportation Planning

Summary

This report responds to Toronto and East York Community Council motion TE28.62, which requested Staff to report on preliminary planning comments, outstanding issues, opportunities to secure City priorities, and a summary of feedback received by Infrastructure Ontario (IO) through its public engagement process for Transit Oriented Communities (TOC) proposals related to the following Ontario Line stations:

  • Corktown Station – comprising two city blocks between Berkeley Street and Parliament Street, south of King Street to Parliament Square park
  • Exhibition Station – comprising two sites on either side of the south end of Atlantic Avenue
  • King and Bathurst Station – comprising two sites on the northeast and southeast corners of the intersection of King Street and Bathurst Street
  • Queen and Spadina Station – comprising two sites on the northeast and southwest corners of the intersection of Queen Street and Spadina Avenue

The report also provides an update on the process and public engagement related to the East Harbour TOC proposal.  This TOC proposal differs from the other Ontario Line TOC proposals in that it covers a broader adjacent development and involves a development partner, Cadillac Fairview.  The City is also making a significant investment in the East Harbour Transit Hub through the SmartTrack program.

 

The report begins with an overview of the TOC program and process to date as it relates to the Metrolinx subways program.  An evaluation of the TOC proposals follows this introduction.  To conclude the report, Staff provide suggestions on how a City-led consultation program may be structured to assist in the consideration of future TOC proposals.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 24, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Transportation Planning - Transit Oriented Communities Update (Preliminary Report)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172921.pdf
(July 28, 2021) Submission from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina - Fort York - King-Bathurst (Sites B and D) Transit-Oriented Community - 647-655 and 662-668 King Street West, 69-76 and 91 Bathurst Street, and 58-60 Stewart Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173859.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(November 14, 2021) Supplementary Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion on City Investment in SmartTrack at East Harbour (TE29.17a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174472.pdf

TE29.35 - Construction Staging Area - 400-420 King Street West (Charlotte Street)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 987 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the east sidewalk on Charlotte Street, between King Street West and a point 45 metres to the north, from December 16, 2021 to December 31, 2026.

 

2. City Council authorize the closure of the north sidewalk and a 2.6 metre-wide portion of the westbound curb lane on King Street West, between Charlotte Street and a point 66 metres east, from July 1, 2022 to August 31, 2024.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of King Street West, between Charlotte Street and a point 54.5 metres east.

 

4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of King Street West, between Charlotte Street and Peter Street.

 

5. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed, to keep clear of any construction debris and made safe.

 

6. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks and/or any proposed pedestrian walkways have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

7. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

8. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

10. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

14. City Council direct that Charlotte Street and King Street West be returned to their pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete, except for Recommendation 4 above.

 

15. City Council direct the applicant to install stop signs and zebra markings at Charlotte Street and Oxley Street, subject to the approval of the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

16. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review the safety and functionality of Charlotte Street in consultation with the local Ward Councillor in the second quarter of 2022.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on King Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

TMG Builders is constructing a 49-storey mixed use residential condominium development at 400-420 King Street West. The site is located at the north-east corner of King Street West and Charlotte Street.

 

Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the east sidewalk on Charlotte Street, between King Street West and a point 45 metres to the north, for a period of 61 months (i.e., December 16, 2021 to December 31, 2026) to accommodate a construction staging area. Transportation Services is also requesting authorization to close the north side sidewalk and a 2.6 metre-wide portion of the westbound curb lane on King Street West, between Charlotte Street and a point 66 metres to the east, for a period of 26 months (i.e., July 1, 2022 to August 31, 2024).

 

Pedestrian movements on the east side of Charlotte Street abutting the site will be restricted and pedestrians will be directed to the west side sidewalk of Charlotte Street. Pedestrian operations on the north side of King Street West will be maintained in a 2.1 metre-wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane.

 

The number of northbound lanes will not be reduced on Charlotte Street. There will still be one westbound lane on King Street West, in which stopping will be prohibited at all times, and there will be no impact on the two eastbound lanes for traffic.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Construction Staging Area - 400-420 King Street West (Charlotte Street)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172914.pdf

TE29.37 - Construction Staging Area - 698-706 Spadina Avenue and 54 Sussex Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
Bills 988 and 989 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk and the parking layby lane on Spadina Avenue, between Sussex Avenue and a point 47.5 metres to the north, from February 1, 2022 to July 31, 2024.

 

2. City Council authorize the closure of the north sidewalk on Sussex Avenue, between Spadina Avenue and Sussex Mews, from February 1, 2022 to July 31, 2024.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing standing prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Sussex Avenue, between Spadina Avenue and Sussex Mews.

 

4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Sussex Avenue between Spadina Avenue and Sussex Mews.

 

5. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday, at a rate of $4.00 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the west side of Spadina Avenue, between Sussex Avenue and a point 47.5 metres north.

 

6. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition on the west side of Spadina Avenue, between Sussex Avenue and a point 19 metres north of Sussex Avenue.

 

7. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Spadina Avenue, between Sussex Avenue and a point 47.5 metres to the north.

 

8. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

10. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

14. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

15. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

16. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

17. Toronto and East York Community Council direct that Spadina Avenue and Sussex Avenue be returned to their pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

18. City Council direct the applicant to install signage on the northwest corner of Sussex Avenue and Sussex Mews indicating "No Construction Vehicles Beyond This Point" and at the northeast corner of Sussex Avenue and Robert St. indicating "Do Not Enter, Construction". The contractor shall ensure no construction vehicles servicing this site enter Sussex Avenue west of Sussex Mews.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Spadina Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Daniels HR Corporation is constructing a 23-storey student residence building at 698-706 Spadina Avenue and 54 Sussex Avenue. The site is located at the north-west corner of Spadina Avenue and Sussex Avenue.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to close the west sidewalk and the parking layby lane on Spadina Avenue, between Sussex Avenue and a point 47.5 metres to the north, for a period of 30 months (i.e. February 1, 2022 to July 31, 2024) to accommodate a construction staging area. Transportation Services is also requesting authorization to close the north side sidewalk on Sussex Avenue, between Spadina Avenue and Sussex Mews for the same period.

 

Pedestrian movements on the west side of Spadina Avenue will be maintained in a 2.1 metre-wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the parking layby. Pedestrian operations abutting the site on the north side of Sussex Avenue will be restricted and pedestrians will be directed to the south side sidewalk of Sussex Avenue. The number of through lanes will not be reduced on Spadina Avenue or Sussex Avenue.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Service - Construction Staging Area - 698-706 Spadina Avenue and 54 Sussex Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172912.pdf

Speakers

Nicholas Provart

Communications (Community Council)

(November 22, 2021) E-mail from Nicholas Provart (TE.Supp)

TE29.39 - Construction Staging Area - 308-314 Jarvis Street and 225 Mutual Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Bills 990 and 991 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk and the southbound curb lane on Jarvis Street, between McClear Place and a point 44 metres south, from January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2022.

 

2. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m. Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday, and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday at a rate of $3.00 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, on the west side of Jarvis Street, between McClear Place and a point 44 metres south.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 6:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday to Friday, at a rate of $3.00 per hour and for a maximum period of 2.5 hours, on the west side of Jarvis Street, between McClear Place and a point 44 metres south.

 

4. City Council rescind the existing no stopping regulation in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the west side of Jarvis Street, between McClear Place and a point 44 metres south.

 

5. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Jarvis Street, between McClear Place and a point 44 metres south.

 

6. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways daily, or more frequently as needed, to keep clear of any construction debris and made safe.

 

7. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkways have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

8. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrian, cyclist and motorist safety is considered at all times.

 

10. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

14. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

15. City Council direct that Jarvis Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

16. City Council direct the applicant to procure, install, and maintain shipping container(s) to be used as a fully covered, protected, unobstructed, and wheelchair accessible pedestrian walkway prior to, or concurrent to, any permits being issued and for the entire duration of the construction staging area permit, at their sole cost.


17. City Council direct the applicant to create a publicly accessible website with regular construction updates and post the website address on the construction site hoarding, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.


18. City Council direct the applicant to mitigate light pollution by installing a shield/barrier on any lighting standards being used for construction purposes within the site in close proximity to adjacent residential properties, such as cranes.


19. City Council direct the applicant to sweep the construction site daily and nightly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.


20. City Council direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to maintain any bike lanes, and install appropriate signage to inform drivers and cyclists of any changes to the cycling lanes.


21. City Council, in areas where no cycling lanes exist, direct the applicant, in consultation with Transportation Services, to install sharrow markings onto the roadway and display appropriate signage on the hoarding board to inform motorists and cyclist to safely share the road.


22. City Council direct the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services and the applicant to establish a construction management working group that meets monthly and invites local stakeholders including Municipal Licensing & Standards, Toronto Buildings, adjacent neighbours, and local resident groups.


23. City Council direct the applicant to email monthly construction progress reports to the local Councillor, local residents’ association, and Business Improvement Area Board of Management.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Jarvis Street, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Jarvis Carlton Limited Partnership is constructing a 34 storey mixed use residential condominium development at 308-314 Jarvis Street and 225 Mutual Street. The site is located at the south-west corner of Jarvis Street and McClear Place.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to close the west sidewalk and a portion of the southbound curb lane on Jarvis Street for a period of 27 months (i.e. January 1, 2022 to March 31, 2024) to accommodate a construction staging area.

 

Pedestrian operations on the west side of Jarvis Street will be maintained in a 1.7 metre-wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the existing lane.

 

The construction staging area on Jarvis Street will result in the loss of one southbound traffic lane. There will still be one 3 metre-wide southbound lane for traffic and one 3 metre-wide northbound-southbound reversible lane (by time of day). There will be no impact on the two northbound lanes (excluding the reversible lane) for traffic.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Construction Staging Area - 308-314 Jarvis Street and 225 Mutual Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172916.pdf

TE29.45 - Accessible Parking Space - Runnymede Road (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
Bill 992 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council designate an on-street accessible parking space on the west side of Runnymede Road, between a point 58.3 metres north of St John's Road and a point 5.5 metres further north.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Runnymede Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation of an on-street accessible parking space on the west side of Runnymede Road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Accessible Parking Space - Runnymede Road (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172871.pdf

TE29.47 - Removal of On-Street Accessible Loading Zone - Davenport Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
Bill 993 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council rescind the existing on-street accessible loading zone in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., daily, on the south side of Davenport Road, between a point 19.8 metres west of Wiltshire Avenue (east leg) and a point 11 metres further west.

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Davenport Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services is requesting approval to remove a designated on-street accessible loading zone on the south side of Davenport Road, between a point 19.8 metres west of Wiltshire Avenue (east leg) and a point 11 metres further west.  The new occupants of the property do not require this space.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Removal of On-Street Accessible Loading Zone - Davenport Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172841.pdf

TE29.50 - Motorcoach Parking and Loading Zone Amendments - Various Locations (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
Bills 994, 995, and 996 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council authorize the amendments of the motorcoach parking zones at various locations as described in Attachment 1 to the report (November 3, 2021) from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services.

 

2. City Council authorize the amendments of the motorcoach loading zone at various locations as described in Attachment 2 to the report (November 3, 2021) from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services.

 

3. City Council authorize the amendments to parking regulations as described in Attachment 3 to the report (November 3, 2021) from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services


4. City Council amend § 950-400B.1(1)(a) of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, by deleting the entry for:  University Avenue, west side, between a point 39 metres south of College Street and a point 10 metres further north.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the streets contained in this report, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

Transportation Services undertook a review of all motorcoach parking and loading zones to ensure consistency between the by-lawed regulations and the signage posted in the field.  Based on that review, changes are proposed to amend or rescind the by-law entries at a number of locations to ensure they are uniform with the signage posted in the field.

 

A companion report, "Motorcoach Parking and Loading Zone Amendments - Various Locations (Delegated)" outlines the required delegated parking amendments for locations without TTC Service.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Motorcoach Parking and Loading Zone Amendments - Various Locations (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172898.pdf

TE29.52 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area 13G to Exclude the Development Located at 898-900 St Clair Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:  

 

1. City Council approve the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of Permit Parking Area "13G", as shown in Attachment 1 to the report (October 20, 2021) from the Director, Permits and Enforcement, Transportation Services.

Origin

(October 20, 2021) Report from the Director, Permits and Enforcement, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on St Clair Avenue West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

The purpose of this report is to respond to Toronto and East York Community Council's direction to review and report back on the realignment of Permit Parking Area 13G to exclude the development located at 898-900 St Clair Avenue West.

 

Staff have determined the realignment of the Permit Parking Area 13G is feasible and has no objections to excluding the development located at 898-900 St Clair Avenue West. If City Council excludes this address from the subject Permit Parking Area, residents and visitors of this address will be prohibited from participating in the on-street permit parking program.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 20, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Director, Permits and Enforcement, Transportation Services - Realignment of Permit Parking Area 13G to Exclude the Development Located at 898-900 St Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172783.pdf

TE29.54 - Pedestrian Crossing Protection - Cosburn Avenue and Gledhill Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Beaches - East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the installation of a pedestrian crossover at the intersection of Cosburn Avenue and Gledhill Avenue.

Origin

(November 3, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Cosburn Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

At its meeting of June 8, 2021, City Council directed Transportation Services' staff to review and report back on the feasibility of installing pedestrian crossing protection on Cosburn Avenue, between Gledhill Avenue and Oak Park Avenue, and to begin the preparation of the necessary drawings.

 

Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services recommends the installation of a pedestrian crossover (PXO) at Cosburn Avenue and Gledhill Avenue.  The proposed PXO will provide a safe and convenient crossing of Cosburn Avenue for all pedestrians, including TTC passengers, users of Stan Wadlow Park and students destined to/from D.A. Morrison Middle School.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 3, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Pedestrian Crossing Protection - Cosburn Avenue and Gledhill Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-172862.pdf

TE29.66 - Construction Staging Area - 1249 Queen Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
The Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE29.66a for information)

Bills 997 and 998 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the south sidewalk and a 1.6 metre wide portion
of the eastbound curb lane on Queen Street East, between a point 66 metres east of
Leslie Street and a point 18 metres further east, from February 1, 2022 to December 1, 2022.


2. City Council authorize a closure of a 1.3 metre wide portion on the north side of
Memory Lane, between a point 66 metres east of Leslie Street and a point 14.1 metres
further east, from February 1, 2022 to June 1, 2023.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00
p.m. Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the south side of Queen Street East,
between a point 66 metres east of Leslie Street and a point 18 metres further east.


4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Queen Street East,
between a point 66 metres east of Leslie Street and a point 18 metres further east.


5. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m. and from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.,
Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday at a rate of $2.00 per hour and for a
maximum period of 3 hours, on the south side of Queen Street East, between a point 66
metres east of Leslie Street and a point 18 metres further east.


6. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent
sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any
construction debris and made safe.


7. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks and/or any
proposed pedestrian walkways have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and
visibility at all times of the day and night.


8. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction,
parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and
resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.


9. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors
to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times and that this set-up be reviewed by the Manager, Cycling and Pedestrian Projects, before the February 16, 2022 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.


10. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control
persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police
Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and
egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.


11. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police
Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police
Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material
deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe
environment for the public.


12. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and
protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.


13. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline
number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20
metres and on all elevations from the construction site.


14. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural
artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

15. City Council direct that Queen Street East and Memory Lane be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

16. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review the operation of the staging area at 1249 Queen Street East and to report to the April 21, 2022 Toronto and East York Community Council meeting on whether the Pay-Duty complement is sufficient and on any changes required to improve cycling safety.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Toronto and East York Community Council directed the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Director, Waterfront Secretariat to report directly to City Council on the anticipated traffic pattern changes in East Toronto  related to tear down of the Gardiner, the impact on existing and future Right of Way occupations and mitigation options. 

Origin

(November 22, 2021) Letter from City Council

Summary

City Council on November 9, 10 and 12, 2021, referred Item TE28.32 back to the November
24, 2021 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council and directed the General
Manager, Transportation Services to:


a. ensure all necessary Transportation Services staff attend a site visit prior to the
November 24, 2021 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council;


b. submit new information or changes to the parking or traffic regulations around 1249
Queen Street East to the November 24, 2021 meeting of the Toronto and East York
Community Council; and


c. ensure that any future construction staging applications that may be affected by the Port Lands Flood Protection, Gardiner removal or other infrastructure projects in the east end include analysis and consideration of these projects in the staging applications.

 

————

 

The report (September 23, 2021) from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation
Services recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the south sidewalk and a 1.6 metre wide portion
of the eastbound curb lane on Queen Street East, between a point 66 metres east of
Leslie Street and a point 18 metres further east, from November 10, 2021 to September
10, 2022.


2. City Council authorize a closure of a 1.3 metre wide portion on the north side of
Memory Lane, between a point 66 metres east of Leslie Street and a point 14.1 metres
further east, from November 10, 2021 to March 10, 2023.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00
p.m. Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the south side of Queen Street East,
between a point 66 metres east of Leslie Street and a point 18 metres further east.


4. City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the south side of Queen Street East,
between a point 66 metres east of Leslie Street and a point 18 metres further east.


5. City Council rescind the existing parking machine regulation in effect from 8:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m. and from 6:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.,
Saturday and 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., Sunday at a rate of $2.00 per hour and for a
maximum period of 3 hours, on the south side of Queen Street East, between a point 66
metres east of Leslie Street and a point 18 metres further east.


6. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent
sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any
construction debris and made safe.


7. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks and/or any
proposed pedestrian walkways have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and
visibility at all times of the day and night.


8. City Council direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction,
parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and
resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.


9. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors
to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.


10. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control
persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police
Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and
egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.


11. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police
Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police
Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material
deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe
environment for the public.


12. City Council direct the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and
protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.


13. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline
number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20
metres and on all elevations from the construction site.


14. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural
artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

15. City Council direct that Queen Street East and Memory Lane be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 9, 2021) Referral from City Council - Item TE28.32 - Construction Staging Area - 1249 Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173588.pdf
(September 23, 2021) Report and Attachment from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Construction Staging Area - 1249 Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173589.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 14, 2021) Supplementary report from the Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services on Construction Staging Area - 1249 Queen Street East - Traffic Mitigation Update (TE29.66a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174439.pdf

TE29.67 - Construction Staging Area - TTC Easier Access Program - Greenwood Station (Stages 2 to 4)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk and all of Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 29.8 metres north, from November 15, 2021 to February 23, 2022.

 

2. City Council to authorize the closure of the north side pedestrian crossing space and north sidewalk on Strathmore Boulevard, between the east side of Linnsmore Crescent and a point 20 metres west, from November 15, 2021 to February 23, 2022.

 

3. City Council authorize the closure of both sidewalks and all of Strathmore Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and a point 27 metres west, from February 24, 2022 to April 20, 2023.

 

4. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk and the southbound lane on Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 24 metres north, from February 24, 2022 to April 20, 2023.

 

5. City Council designate Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 24 metres north as one-way northbound.

 

6. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, on the east side of Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 24 metres north.

 

7. City Council prohibit stopping at all times, on the east side of Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 24 metres north.

 

8. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

10. City direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

14. City Council the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

15. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

16. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

17. City Council direct that Strathmore Boulevard and Linnsmore Crescent be returned to pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

18. City Council amend the existing parking prohibition in effect from the 16th day to the last day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the north side of Wolverleigh Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and Woodington Avenue, to be in effect from Monarch Park Avenue to Woodington Avenue.

 

19. City Council amend the existing parking prohibition in effect at anytime, December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, on the north side of Wolverleigh Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and Woodington Avenue, to be in effect from Monarch Park Avenue to Woodington Avenue.

 

20. City Council amend the existing permit parking regulation in effect 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., except no parking from the 16th day to the last day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive and no parking anytime from December 1 of one year to March 31 of the next following year, inclusive, on the even (north) side of Wolverleigh Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and Coxwell Avenue, to be in effect from Monarch Park Avenue to Coxwell Avenue.

 

21. City Council enact permit parking in effect 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., on the even (north) side of Wolverleigh Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and Monarch Park Avenue.

 

22. City Council amend the existing parking prohibition in effect from the first day to the 15th day of each month, from April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the south side of Wolverleigh Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and Woodington Avenue, to be in effect from Monarch Park Avenue to Woodington Avenue.

 

23. City Council amend the existing permit parking regulation in effect from 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., except no parking from the 1st day to the 15th day of each month, April 1 to November 30, inclusive, on the odd (south) side of Wolverleigh Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and Coxwell Avenue, to be in effect from Monarch Park Avenue to Coxwell Avenue.

 

24. City Council enact permit parking in effect 12:01 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., on the odd (south) side of Wolverleigh Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and Monarch Park Avenue.

 

25. City Council require a written commitment from the TTC to the resident at 21 Linsmore for the creation of a designated spot and the provision of electric vehicle charging equipment before work commences on Phase 2, and this commitment to be placed on file with City Staff and the local Councillor.

 

26. City Council direct Transportation to affix per permit parking on Strathmore between Oakdene and Linsmore to North side and authorize the General Manger, Transportation Services to bring forward any bills to make that change prior Phase 2 work commencing.

 

27. City Council direct the TTC to obtain parking spots for residents who are losing access to parking in a nearby off-street lot, particularly 1275 Danforth Avenue and to provide written confirmation to the City before the Phase 2 work commences.  

 

28. City Council direct Transportation Services to move parking on the  west wide of Linsmore Crescent, north of Strathmore Blvd one space north to bring forward any bills to make that change prior Phase 2 work commencing.

Origin

(November 22, 2021) Letter from Letter from City Council

Summary

City Council on November 9, 10 and 12, 2021, referred Item TE28.31, headed "Construction Staging Area - TTC Easier Access Program - Greenwood Station (Stages 2 to 4)", back to Toronto and East York Community Council for further consideration.

                                                                 ______________

 

The report (September 23, 2021) from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk and all of Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 29.8 metres north, from November 15, 2021 to February 23, 2022.

 

2. City Council to authorize the closure of the north side pedestrian crossing space and north sidewalk on Strathmore Boulevard, between the east side of Linnsmore Crescent and a point 20 metres west, from November 15, 2021 to February 23, 2022.

 

3. City Council authorize the closure of both sidewalks and all of Strathmore Boulevard, between Linnsmore Crescent and a point 27 metres west, from February 24, 2022 to April 20, 2023.

 

4. City Council authorize the closure of the west sidewalk and the southbound lane on Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 24 metres north, from February 24, 2022 to April 20, 2023.

 

5. City Council designate Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 24 metres north as one-way northbound.

 

6. City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times, on the east side of Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 24 metres north.

 

7. City Council prohibit stopping at all times, on the east side of Linnsmore Crescent, between Strathmore Boulevard and a point 24 metres north.

 

8. City Council direct the applicant to pressure wash the construction site and adjacent sidewalks and roadways weekly, or more frequently as needed to be cleared of any construction debris and made safe.

 

9. City Council direct the applicant to ensure that the existing sidewalks or the proposed pedestrian walkway have proper enhanced lighting to ensure safety and visibility at all times of the day and night.

 

10. City direct the applicant to clearly consult and communicate all construction, parking and road occupancy impacts with local business improvement areas and resident associations in advance of any physical road modifications.

 

11. City Council direct the applicant to install appropriate signage and converging mirrors to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and motorists safety is considered at all times.

 

12. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of traffic control persons as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, on a daily basis to control construction vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

13. City Council direct the applicant to provide a sufficient number of pay-duty Police Officers as determined by the Work Zone Traffic Coordinator and Toronto Police Construction Liaison Officer, during large scale concrete pours and large scale material deliveries to control vehicle access and egress to and from the site and maintain a safe environment for the public.

 

14. City Council the applicant to install cane detection within the covered and protected walkway to guide pedestrians who are visually impaired.

 

15. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

16. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

17. City Council direct that Strathmore Boulevard and Linnsmore Crescent be returned to pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 22, 2021) Referral from City Council - Item TE28.31 - Construction Staging Area - TTC Easier Access Program - Greenwood Station (Stages 2 to 4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173566.pdf
(September 23, 2021) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Acting Director, Traffic Management, Transportation Services - Construction Staging Area - TTC Easier Access Program - Greenwood Station (Stages 2 to 4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173567.pdf

TE29.82 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2021 Winter Village (Non delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 999 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the temporary traffic and parking regulations on streets in the vicinity of Distillery District that are impacted during the Distillery Winter Village, identified in Revised Appendix A to the Letter (November 20, 2021) from Councillor Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York.  The temporary parking regulations will override all existing regulations from December 16, 2021 to December 31, 2021, inclusive.

Origin

(November 20, 2021) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York

Summary

The annual Distillery Winter Village (formerly known as the Distillery Christmas Market) draws hundreds of thousands of visitors to the Distillery District each year. This year the event runs from November 18- December 31st 2021. The high volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic generated during the Winter Village can create unsafe roads for all users and has significant impact on the local residents.

 

The following temporary parking regulations will help maintain efficient and safer traffic conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 20, 2021) Letter and Attachment from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic and Parking Regulations for 2021 Winter Village (Non delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173519.pdf
(November 24, 2021) Revised Attachment A
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173738.pdf

TE29.85 - 545 King Street West - Loading Zone

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
Bill 1000 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the existing Commercial Loading Zone in effect at all times on the south side of King Street West, between a point 94.4 metres east of Portland Street and a point 33 metres further east, to operate between a point 55 metres east of Portland Street and a point 30 metres further east.

 

2. City Council amend the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of King Street West, between a point 127.4 metres east of Portland Street and a point 96.3 metres further east, to operate between a point 85 metres east of Portland Street and a point 138.7 metres further east.

 

3. City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of King Street West, between a point 61.6 metres east of Portland Street and a point 32.8 metres further east.

 

4.  City Council rescind the designated taxi stand for three taxis in effect at all times on the south side of King Street West, between a point 41 metres east of Portland Street and a point 20.6 metres further east.

Origin

(November 24, 2021) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York

Summary

Transportation Services received a complaint regarding the removal of a commercial loading zone fronting a business at 545 King Street West.  Staff investigated and found the commercial loading zone was removed as result of the establishment of a construction access gate for a nearby development site, which will also serve as the permanent access to the building's underground parking.   

 

This motion seeks to expedite the re-location of this commercial loading zone which is urgently needed by a nearby business.  During the course of staff's investigation, they identified an inconsistency in the by-laws and the signed conditions on King Street West.  Recommendation 4 will correct this inconsistency.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 24, 2021) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York - 545 King Street West - Loading Zone
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173708.pdf

TE29.87 - Safer Streets - Ward 10 (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve:

  1. the introduction of a signalized pedestrian crossing of the Lake Shore Boulevard West off-ramp at the merge with northbound Spadina Avenue, where there is an existing unsignalized pedestrian crossing;
     
  2. the expedited installation of temporary traffic control signals at intersections on Queens Quay East from Yonge Street to Parliament Street as previously approved in the 2010 East Bayfront Transit EA and subsequent updates, including but not limited to Freeland Street, in advance of the reconstruction of the street and implementation of the planned Waterfront East LRT, in consultation with Waterfront Toronto;
     
  3. replacement of the pedestrian crosswalk at the intersection of King Street West and Brant Street with a Traffic Control Signal, and approve the installation of a Traffic Control Signal concurrently with the removal of the pedestrian crossover at this location; and
               
  4. the introduction of stop control for southbound right-turning vehicles at the intersection of Bay Street and Queen Street West.

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to:                                        

  1. expedite the urgent installation of fixed bollards that can absorb the force of a vehicular impact to protect the pedestrian refuge between Lake Shore Boulevard West and Fleet Street, west of the intersection with Bathurst Street;
     
  2. expedite the urgent renewal of pavement markings at all intersections along Queens Quay East where the Martin Goodman Trail crossing vehicular traffic, using interim materials and treatments where necessary to provide prompt action; and
     
  3. in coordination with Waterfront Toronto, expedite the "Quick Starts" intersection safety improvements from Lower Jarvis to Cherry Street as outlined in the Lake Shore Boulevard East Public Realm Plan, and review any traffic regulation pavement marking and signage changes to improve safety conditions at these intersections due to constrained sightlines from Gardiner Expressway structures.

Origin

(November 24, 2021) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina-Fort York

Summary

Building streets that are safe for all road users – pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists – is the responsibility of all of us. Every death and injury on our streets is a preventable tragedy.

 

There are a number of street safety enhancements that local communities in Ward 10 have been working closely with my office on for many years. These initiatives have strong support in local neighbourhoods, and are critical steps to improve safety on our downtown streets.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 24, 2021) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy, Ward 10, Spadina Fort-York - Safer Streets - Ward 10 (non-delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173789.pdf

TE29.88 - Addressing Development Pressure at Bloor Street West and Spadina Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the community, to coordinate the application review process for the existing and future applications at the corner of Spadina Avenue and Bloor Street West, that include public realm, urban design, transportation impacts, sustainability and potential for district energy, city servicing and heritage, and undertake any studies Planning staff deem necessary and policy reviews Planning staff deem necessary, as a result of this coordinated approach.

 

2. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to initiate Indigenous-led engagement to inform the redevelopments at the Spadina Avenue and Bloor Street West intersection.

Origin

(November 24, 2021) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 11, University - Rosedale

Summary

The four corners at Bloor Street West and Spadina intersection is facing significant transformation in the near future due to large-scale anticipated growth. Both northern corners of the intersection currently have applications submitted to the City to permit high-rise towers and the southeast corner has been identified as a development site for the University of Toronto. This high level of planned growth warrants a comprehensive lens to inform the redevelopment of this major downtown intersection.

 

Thousands of new residents will potentially be housed at this single intersection. While there are planning studies and frameworks, development guidelines, and policy documents such as the Official Plan and TOCore, the breadth of development that is now anticipated for this area exceeds what was initially expected. While there are height restrictions and building envelope guidelines, coordination of the development proposals and understanding of the cumulative impact of development (human density) to infrastructure is an important piece that needs to be considered.

 

The Bloor-Spadina intersection also holds significance for Indigenous communities. The name Spadina itself originates from Ojibway "Ishpadinaa", "a place on a hill". Immediately to the north of Bloor on Spadina, there are two important Indigenous cultural and housing organizations, Wigwamen Terrace, a seniors housing residence managed by Wigwamen Inc, Ontario's largest Aboriginal urban housing provider as well as Native Canadian Centre of Toronto. Through engagement with Toronto-based Indigenous organizations, the importance of the south east corner in terms of its significance as a gathering space for indigenous people in the city, including those who have recently arrived to Toronto, was highlighted.

 

During the Working Group meetings for the Development Application of 334-350 Bloor, the importance of meaningful Indigenous engagement to inform the redevelopment of the Bloor and Spadina intersection came up as an important element, that both residents, the Applicant, and City Staff felt should be properly pursued in all applications in this area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 24, 2021) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 11, University - Rosedale - Addressing Development Pressure at Bloor Street West and Spadina
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-173790.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 14, 2021) Letter from Rita Bilerman, The Annex Residents' Association (CC.Supp)

New Business - Meeting 38

CC38.1 - COVID-19 Intergovernmental Funding Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Recommendations

The City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer recommend that:  

 

1.  City Council request that the Government of Canada and the Ontario Government provide funding commitments to address the City's COVID-19 related financial impacts in 2022 and 2023.

 

2.  City Council request that the Government of Canada and the Ontario Government allocate COVID-19 related support to municipal governments on a needs basis, including recently announced provincial operating funding for public transit systems.

 

3.  City Council request that the Ontario Government confirm that $28 million in provincial emergency funding that has been previously committed to the City for public transit as part of Phase 2 funding can be rolled over past the end of the provincial fiscal year (March 31, 2021).

Summary

Partnerships between governments have been critical in our country's response to COVID-19, including efforts to contain the pandemic, roll-out vaccines and safely re-open the economy. Investments from the federal and provincial governments, including through the Safe Restart Agreement, have been fundamental to this effort by supporting the preservation of the City's essential services and allowing job-creating capital investments to proceed.

 

However, Toronto and other large cities continue to face a precarious multi-year recovery. Federal and provincial partnerships will be required to mitigate pressures related to COVID-19 in 2022 and beyond, including those caused by transit ridership losses and additional expenditures in areas such as the shelter system. According to preliminary estimates, $1.0 billion to $1.4 billion in further funding commitments are required to address 2022 COVID-19 related impacts alone. Commitments are required in the short term to address this situation so that City staff can present a balanced budget for 2022, and avoid a reduction in service offerings (including pandemic response) and capital offsets/deferrals, which would both delay and hinder the City's recovery. As the economic driver of the province and country, Toronto's rapid recovery from the economic shock of COVID-19 is critical.

Background Information

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer on COVID-19 Intergovernmental Funding Update (CC38.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174228.pdf

CC38.2 - Report on Councillor Josh Matlow’s Tweet Criticizing a Committee Decision

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(December 8, 2021) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

In May 2021, the Office of the Integrity Commissioner received a complaint about a Tweet Councillor Josh Matlow posted on April 27, 2021.

 

Councillor Matlow had proposed an item for the Economic and Community Development Committee (the "Committee") to consider at its meeting on April 27, 2021. After the Committee considered the item, it decided to refer the matter to City staff. Councillor Matlow was displeased and Tweeted that the Committee's decision was "cowardly, dangerous, inequitable & wrong."

 

The complaint, which was made by the Chair of the Committee, alleged the Tweet was a contravention of Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct) of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council ("The Code of Conduct").

 

The Integrity Commissioner investigated and found that the Tweet was not discreditable conduct under the Code of Conduct.

Background Information

(December 8, 2021) Cover report from the Integrity Commissioner on Report on Councillor Josh Matlow’s Tweet Criticizing a Committee Decision (CC38.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174216.pdf
Attachment 1 - Report on Councillor Josh Matlow’s Tweet Criticizing a Committee Decision
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174217.pdf

CC38.3 - Litigation Due to Contaminated Laneway Located Near Queen Street East and Coxwell Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Litigation that affects the City of Toronto and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation privilege.

Origin

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, at the discretion of the City Solicitor, but that the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client and litigation privilege.

Summary

Contaminated soil and groundwater may be present in a laneway (the "Laneway") owned by the City and may also be present on Queen Street, Coxwell Avenue, and Eastern Avenue. The contamination may be as a result of operations carried on by businesses located on Queen Street East, immediately adjacent to the Laneway.

 

Toronto Community Housing Corporation owns 1555 and 1575 Queen Street East (the "Toronto Community Housing Corporation Property"). Part of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Property borders the south side of the Laneway. Toronto Community Housing Corporation commenced legal action against existing and former adjacent property owners whose activities, it alleges, are the source of contamination on the Toronto Community Housing Corporation Property.

 

Confidential Attachment 1 contains legal advice from the City Solicitor regarding the litigation.

Background Information

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on Litigation Due to Contaminated Laneway Located Near Queen Street East and Coxwell Avenue (CC38.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174231.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC38.4 - 2200 to 2206 Eglinton Avenue East, 1020 to 1030 Birchmount Road and 75 Thermos Road - Official Plan Amendment - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CC38.4a with recommendations).

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct that all information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 8, 2021) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

On August 9, 2018, the applicant submitted an Official Plan Amendment Application to amend the Toronto Official Plan to add a Site and Area-Specific Policy ("SASP") for the property at 2200 to 2206 Eglinton Avenue East, 1020 to 1030 Birchmount Road and 75 Thermos Road (the "Subject Lands") to permit a mixed-use development including new public streets and parkland.  The Subject Lands are located within the Golden Mile Secondary Plan area.

 

On April 23, 2020, during the COVID-19 state of emergency, the applicant appealed their proposed SASP to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "OLT") due to Council's failure to make a decision within the statutory timeframe.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions regarding a matter appealed to the OLT. A hearing is scheduled to commence on April 18, 2022.

Background Information

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on 2200 to 2206 Eglinton Avenue East, 1020 to 1030 Birchmount Road and 75 Thermos Road - Official Plan Amendment - Request for Directions (CC38.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174225.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
(December 14, 2021) Supplementary Report from the City Solicitor on 2200 to 2206 Eglinton Avenue East, 1020 to 1030 Birchmount Road and 75 Thermos Road - Official Plan Amendment - Request for Directions (CC38.4a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174480.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A
Confidential Appendix B

CC38.5 - 20 and 50 Ashtonbee Road, 1920 and 1940 Eglinton Avenue East and 880, 890 and 900 Warden Avenue - Official Plan Amendment - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CC38.5a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.

Origin

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct that all information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 7, 2021) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

On February 15, 2019, the applicant submitted an Official Plan Amendment Application to amend the Toronto Official Plan to add a Site and Area-Specific Policy ("SASP") for the property at 1920 to 1940 Eglinton Avenue East, 880 to 900 Warden Avenue and 20 to 50 Ashtonbee Road (the "Subject Lands") to permit a mixed-use development including new public streets. The Subject Lands are located within the Golden Mile Secondary Plan study area.

 

On April 23, 2020, during the COVID-19 state of emergency, the applicant appealed their proposed SASP to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "OLT") due to Council's failure to make a decision within the statutory timeframe.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions regarding a matter appealed to the OLT.

Background Information

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on 20 and 50 Ashtonbee Road, 1920 and 1940 Eglinton Avenue East and 880, 890 and 900 Warden Avenue - Official Plan Amendment - Request for Directions (CC38.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174214.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
(December 15, 2021) Supplementary Report from the City Solicitor on 20 and 50 Ashtonbee Road, 1920 and 1940 Eglinton Avenue East and 880, 890 and 900 Warden Avenue - Official Plan Amendment - Request for Directions - Supplementary Report (CC38.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174500.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on August 30, 2022
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174516.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - made public on August 30, 2022
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174517.pdf
Confidential Appendix C - made public on August 30, 2022
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174502.pdf

CC38.6 - King-Spadina Secondary Plan - City-initiated Official Plan Amendment - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Soicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 8, 2021) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council direct that the confidential recommendations and all other information contained in and attached to Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 8, 2021) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

Summary

On January 29, 2020, City Council adopted Official Plan Amendment 486, which amended the existing Chapter 6, Section 16, King-Spadina Secondary Plan of the Official Plan.  The Secondary Plan was subsequently appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "OLT") by 46 appellants.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions in this matter which is the subject of an appeal to the OLT.

Background Information

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on King-Spadina Secondary Plan - City-initiated Official Plan Amendment - Request for Directions (CC38.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174218.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A

CC38.7 - 2793, 2795-2799 Bathurst Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Further Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(November 29, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 29, 2021) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the Confidential Recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 29, 2012) from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council, with the balance of the Confidential Attachment 1 to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor as it contains advice, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek further instruction regarding a development application at 2793, 2795-2799 Bathurst Street.

 

This report has been prepared in consultation with City Planning.

 

At its meeting on December 4, 5 and 13, 2018, City Council endorsed a settlement from Aird and Berlis LLP, dated October 1, 2018, on behalf of the owner for a 9 storey mixed-use development with residential and retail uses at 2795-2799 Bathurst Street.

 

City Council's decision is available at:

 

Agenda Item History - 2019.CC1.18 (toronto.ca)

 

A Local Appeal Planning Tribunal hearing was held on January 17, 2019 to consider the proposed settlement (PL170696) for 2795-2799 Bathurst Street.  On January 30, 2019, the Tribunal issued a decision allowing the appeal, in part, and approved the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment in principle, but withheld its final order pending satisfaction of certain preconditions.

 

On November 22, 2021, the City Solicitor received a with prejudice offer of a revised settlement from Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner, proposing that the corner site at 2793 Bathurst Street be included to the development at 2795-2799 Bathurst Street.  The offer is the result of extensive discussions with City staff. Further detail regarding revisions to the previous settlement offer dated October 1, 2018, is provided below.

Background Information

(November 29, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on 2793, 2795-2799 Bathurst Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Further Direction (CC38.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174158.pdf
Public Appendix A - Settlement Offer dated November 22, 2021 from Aird and Berlis LLP
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174160.pdf
Public Appendix B - Architectural Plans dated June 1, 2021 prepared by IBI Group Architects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174161.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC38.8 - 4050 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - Eglinton - Lawrence

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(December 6, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 6, 2021) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 6, 2021) from the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 6, 2021) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

 

4.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 2 to 10, inclusive, to the report (December 6, 2021) from the City Solicitor, if the Recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 are adopted by City Council.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request instructions for the purpose of an appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) scheduled to commence on May 9, 2022.

Background Information

(December 6, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on 4050 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Directions (CC38.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174136.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174142.pdf
Confidential Attachment 3 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174143.pdf
Confidential Attachment 4 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174144.pdf
Confidential Attachment 5 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174145.pdf
Confidential Attachment 6 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174146.pdf
Confidential Attachment 7 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174147.pdf
Confidential Attachment 8 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174148.pdf
Confidential Attachment 9 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174149.pdf
Confidential Attachment 10 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174150.pdf

CC38.9 - 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 26 Engelhart Crescent and 64 and 68 Harris Park Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CC38.9a with recommendations).

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation

Origin

(December 6, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct that all information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (December 6, 2021) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

On October 4, 2016, the applicant submitted an Official Plan Amendment to amend the Toronto Official Plan to add a Site and Area Specific Policy for the lands known as the Eglinton Square lands (1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, 14-26 and 19-23 Engelhart Crescent, and 64-68 Harris Park Drive) Application 16 230579 ESC 35 OZ to permit a mixed use development (the "Originally Proposed Site and Area Specific Policy ").  The Originally Proposed Site and Area Specific Policy maintained the existing Mixed Use Areas and Neighbourhoods designations.

 

The Originally Proposed Site and Area Specific Policy provided for a mixed-use community to develop over time on the lands.  The proposed mixed-use development would include multiple tall buildings with a range of building heights and stacked townhouses with a total of 1,630 residential units and 26,004 square metres of new retail uses proposed to be developed in five (5) blocks.

 

A related Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application (File 16 230698 ESC 35 RH) under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code) was also submitted on October 4, 2016 to allow for the removal of 91 rental units in eight (8) existing apartment buildings, to be replaced elsewhere in the future redevelopment of the site.  Review of this application is underway and a decision on this application will be deferred until such time as a decision has been made by the Ontario Land Tribunal on the Official Plan Amendment application, and a decision has been made on the Zoning By-law Amendment (17 242390 ESC 35 OZ) application for these lands.

 

On November 10, 2017, the applicant appealed their proposed Official Plan Amendment to the OLT due to Council's failure to make a decision within the statutory timeframe.

 

On December 16, 2019, the City received a letter from the applicant's solicitor, being a "with prejudice" settlement offer and formal revision to the application ("Resubmission Letter").  The Resubmission Letter advised that the applicant has amended its application to include all of its lands, inclusive of the existing shopping mall, and excluding the lands south of Engelhart Crescent (Block E in the Originally Proposed Site and Area Specific Policy, which contains the four existing rental apartment buildings at 19-23 Engelhart Crescent and 64-68 Harris Park Drive) with a proposed density of 4.9 times the area of the lands.  The Resubmission Letter was not accompanied by any supporting reports or update letters from the original application, as acknowledged in the Resubmission Letter.  City Staff are not in a position to adequately review, circulate and comment on the revised proposal given the lack of a complete submission package. City staff require a complete submission package, including supporting reports, in order to adequately review and comment on the revised proposal.

 

On January 8, 2020, Scarborough Community Council directed that the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and appropriate City staff attend a meeting to discuss a possible resolution of the matter in advance of the January 29, 2020 City Council meeting.  The matter was deferred at the January 29, 2020 City Council meeting and due to COVID-19 it was subsequently deferred to the July 28 and 29 City Council meeting and then the November 25 and 26, 2020 City Council meeting.

 

At its April 7 and 8, 2021 meeting, City Council considered a Request for Directions Report from the City Solicitor on the Official Plan Amendment.

 

In May 2021, the Applicant revised their existing Zoning By-law Amendment application and expanded the boundaries to include the entire site. The Applicant has subsequently appealed their Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Land Tribunal.

 

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions in this matter which is the subject of an appeal to the Ontario Land Tribunal.

Background Information

(December 6, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 26 Engelhart Crescent and 64 and 68 Harris Park Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Directions (CC38.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174156.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
(December 15, 2021) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on 1-70 Eglinton Square, 1431 and 1437 Victoria Park Avenue, 14, 18, 19, 22, 23 and 26 Engelhart Crescent and 64 and 68 Harris Park Drive - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment - Request for Directions (CC38.9a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174473.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on July 27, 2022
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174482.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - made public on July 27, 2022
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174475.pdf
Confidential Appendix C - made public on July 27, 2022
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174496.pdf
Confidential Appendix D - made public on July 27, 2022
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174497.pdf
Confidential Attachment to motion 1 by Councillor Gary Crawford

CC38.10 - 1001 Ellesmere Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Further Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Scarborough Southwest

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.

Origin

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Attachment 2 is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

Goldman Ellesmere 2 Developments Incorporated and the Goldman Group (the "Owner") applied to redevelop a former industrial site with townhouses and a 4-storey commercial building at 1001 Ellesmere Road (the "Site") in 2014.  The Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications were appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (the "Tribunal") due to the City's lack of decision within the statutory timeframe.

 

On March 31, 2015, City Council supported a settlement with the Owner, which was ultimately approved by the Tribunal.  The Tribunal's approval re-designated a portion of the Site Mixed Use Area (Blocks 1, 2, 3), while maintaining the Employment Area designation for another portion of the Site (Block 4).  As a result of the settlement, townhouses are permitted on Blocks 1, 2 and 3, whereas Block 4 is only permitted to have certain commercial uses.  The settlement contemplated specific phasing of the development, and required that Block 4 be developed for commercial uses prior to residential townhouse development on Block 3.  The Zoning By-law Amendments (By-law 1109-2015 (Ontario Municipal Board), and By-law 892-2016 (Ontario Municipal Board)), require phasing, which is secured and set out in greater detail in in both the Section 37 Agreement (Public Attachment A) and the Subdivision Agreement (Public Attachment B).

 

Townhouses have been developed on Blocks 1 and 2, and the Owner has provided the City with a proposed revision to the settlement offer (Public Attachment C).  The purpose of this report is to request further instructions on this revision.

Background Information

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on 1001 Ellesmere Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Further Request for Direction (CC38.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174178.pdf
Public Attachment A - Registered Section 37 Agreement respecting 1001 Ellesmere Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174179.pdf
Public Attachment B - Registered Subdivision Agreement respecting 1001 Ellesmere Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174180.pdf
Public Attachment C - Revised Settlement Offer from Devine Park LLP dated July 13, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174181.pdf
Public Attachment D - Zoning By-law 1109-2015 (OMB)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174182.pdf
Public Attachment E - Zoning By-law 892-2016 (OMB)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174183.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174185.pdf
Confidential Attachment to motion 1 by Councillor Michael Thompson

CC38.11 - 933 - 935 The Queensway - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding potential litigation.

Origin

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report (December 7, 2021) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report (December 7, 2021) from the City Solicitor at the discretion of the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Report (December 7, 2021) from the City Solicitor is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information, which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the potential Ontario Land Tribunal hearing into this matter currently scheduled to commence on March 7, 2022, for two weeks.  The applicant appealed the proposed zoning by-law amendment for 933-935 The Queensway to the Ontario Land Tribunal due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. By letter dated December 7, 2021, attached to this report as Public Attachment "1", and revised plans dated November 22, 2021, attached to this report as Public Attachment "2", counsel for the applicant made a with prejudice settlement offer to the City (the "Settlement Offer") proposing a revised development on the site (the "Revised Proposal").

Background Information

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on 933 - 935 The Queensway - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC38.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174154.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Letter from Aird and Berlis LLP dated December 7, 2021 regarding 933-935 The Queensway, Etobicoke
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174155.pdf
Public Attachment 2 - Architectural Plans and Drawings, dated November 22, 2021 prepared by TACT Architecture Inc.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174176.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC38.12 - 2 Valleyanna Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Confidential Attachment - Advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding litigation.

Origin

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the City Solicitor report dated December 7, 2021.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report and Confidential Appendix A, at the discretion of the City Solicitor, if adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice and information which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request further instructions for the Ontario Land Tribunal ("Tribunal") proceeding that is currently scheduled for a case management conference on December 17, 2021.  The applicant has appealed the proposed zoning by-law amendment application for 2 Valleyanna Drive due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.

 

On July 14 and 15, 2021, City Council directed the City Solicitor, along with appropriate staff, to oppose the appeal.

Background Information

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on 2 Valleyanna Drive - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions (CC38.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174186.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A
Confidential Attachment to motion 1 by Councillor Jaye Robinson

CC38.13 - Port Lands Official Plan Modification Ontario Land Tribunal Appeals (Phase 2) - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CC38.13a with recommendations).

Confidential Attachment - Litigation that affects the City of Toronto and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1. City Council adopt the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, and Confidential Appendices A and B to Confidential Attachment 1, once adopted by City Council.

 

3. City Council direct that the remainder of Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains information that is subject to solicitor-client and settlement privilege.

Summary

The Port Lands Official Plan Modification (the "Port Lands OPM" or "OPM") was first endorsed by City Council in December of 2017. Several appellants of the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan ("OPA 257" or "CWSP"), including public agencies, existing industries, and private owners with development aspirations, raised issues with the Port Lands OPM. Given the large number of parties and issues, the hearing of the Port Lands issues was planned to be phased. The first phase dealt with Land Use and Transportation matters, and was resolved through negotiation and settlement discussions, resulting in Decisions and Orders of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal in March and May of 2021, commending the City and the parties and approving the OPM in part.  

 

The remaining issues to be litigated include matters related to: Urban Design Standards & Heritage; Sustainability and Biodiversity; Infrastructure (Community and Hard Servicing) & Implementation; and Hydro-specific Issues. A six-week hearing is scheduled for May and June, 2022 to deal with any outstanding issues (the Port Lands OPM Hearing (Phase 2)).

 

The purpose of this report is to seek instructions in respect of the Port Lands OPM Hearing (Phase 2). City Planning has been involved in the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(December 7, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor on Port Lands Official Plan Modification Ontario Land Tribunal Appeals (Phase 2) - Request for Direction (CC38.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174137.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174139.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174140.pdf
(December 13, 2021) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on Port Lands Official Plan Modification Ontario Land Tribunal Appeals (Phase 2) - Request for Direction (CC38.13a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174405.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on December 24, 2021
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174407.pdf

CC38.14 - Assumption of Services, University Square (Hucknall) Limited, Plan 66M-2493, Subdivision File: 04 138822 NNY 08 SB, 102-134 Hucknall Road - Litigation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - Humber River - Black Creek

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City of Toronto and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(December 6, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services

Recommendations

The City Solicitor and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services recommend that: 

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1, if adopted by City Council, at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council direct that all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential, as it contains advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Summary

A Subdivision Agreement was registered on December 1, 2011 for Plan 66M-2493, between University Square (Hucknall) Limited and the City of Toronto.  The subject subdivision is shown on the attached map, Attachment 1 Plan of Subdivision 66M-2493.  The site has frontage on Sentinel Road and Hucknall Road.

 

The construction of Mantello Drive and the services within the road were completed on or about July of 2013.  The up-stream portion of the sanitary sewer that was constructed under Mantello Drive (the road shown in Attachment 1 which has yet to be assumed) contains a 21.9 metre length of sanitary sewer located between two manholes (MH3A and MH4A) that was not constructed according to the original accepted design and the City's design criteria applicable at the time of construction.  This section of sewer in question essentially has a 1.28 percent slope rather than the 2 percent minimum slope applicable at the time of construction.  All other deficiencies in the services to be assumed have been rectified to the satisfaction of Engineering & Construction Services (ECS).

 

There is litigation concerning this matter.  The purpose of this report is to request instructions from Council regarding the on-going litigation.

 

Staff from Toronto Water have also been involved in the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(December 6, 2021) Report from the City Solicitor and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services on Assumption of Services, University Square (Hucknall) Limited, Plan 66M-2493, Subdivision File: 04 138822 NNY 08 SB, 102-134 Hucknall Road - Litigation (CC38.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174162.pdf
Public Attachment 1 - Map of Plan of Subdivision 66M-2493
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174164.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC38.15 - 147 Church Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (CC38.15a with recommendations)

Origin

(December 1, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Recommendations

The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that:

 

1.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at 147 Church Street (including entrance addresses at 149 Church Street, 18 Dalhousie Street, and 20 Dalhousie Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 147 Church Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (December 1, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.  If there are no objections to the designation, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 147 Church Street (including entrance addresses at 149 Church Street, 18 Dalhousie Street, and 20 Dalhousie Street) for its design, associative, and contextual values under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

Constructed circa 1910 for prominent Toronto businessman and contractor Joseph Wright, the property at 147 Church Street spans the shallow block between Church and Dalhousie Streets, and includes a primary elevation on the east side of Church Street and a secondary elevation on the west side of Dalhousie Street. The property is a representative example of the Edwardian Classicism architectural style that was popular for commercial buildings in the early 20th century. The property retains its original scale, form, and massing as a 3-storey flat-roofed building, and its Edwardian Classicism style is reflected in its simple, balanced design and restrained classical detailing.

 

On June 8, 2018, an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application was made for a site at 139-149 Church Street. The original development scheme did not propose the conservation of any portion of the building at 147 Church Street. As a result of continued discussions with the owner in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues, the revised development scheme, at the time of writing this report, involves demolition of the building at 147 Church Street, and panelization and reconstruction of its principal (west) elevation.

 

In June 2019, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 (Bill 108) received Royal Assent. Schedule 11 of this Act included amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act. The Bill 108 Amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act came into force on July 1, 2021, which included a shift in Part IV designations related to certain Planning Act applications. Section 29(1.2) of the Ontario Heritage Act now restricts City Council's ability to give notice of its intention to designate a property under the Ontario Heritage Act to within 90 days after the City Clerk gives notice of a complete application.

 

The application currently under review was deemed complete prior to the new legislation coming into force on July 1, 2021.

 

Designation will enable City Council to review proposed alterations or demolitions to the property and enforce heritage property standards and maintenance.

Background Information

(December 1, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 147 Church Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Attachments 1 to 3 (CC38.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174227.pdf
(December 3, 2021) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on 147 Church Street - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act (CC38.15a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174244.pdf

CC38.16 - 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (CC38.16a with recommendations)

Origin

(December 1, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Recommendations

The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that:

 

1.  City Council state its intention to designate the property at 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West (including active entrances at 525 and 535 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 11, 13, and 15 Bathurst Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (December 1, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.  If there are no objections to the designation, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the Bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the listed heritage property at 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West (including active entrances at 525 and 535 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 11, 13, and 15 Bathurst Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its design/physical, historical/ associative, and contextual values.

 

The Crosse & Blackwell building located on the property at 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West holds heritage value as a unique example of a former industrial headquarters with Art Deco and Beaux Arts stylistic influences. The property comprises a three-and-a-half-storey brick and cast-stone building with a two-and-a-half-storey hexagonal pavilion, located on the southeast corner of Lake Shore Boulevard West and Bathurst Street. Constructed in 1927 as an office and manufacturing plant for Crosse & Blackwell, a longstanding producer of British foodstuffs, was one of the first buildings constructed on reclaimed land at the west end of Toronto harbour as part of the Toronto Harbour Commission's waterfront industrial development plan. The building's design by notable architects Chapman and Oxley demonstrates a unique application of Art Deco and Beaux Arts stylistic influences to an industrial headquarters.

 

Listed on the City's inaugural heritage register by City Council on June 20, 1973, the Crosse & Blackwell Building located on the property at 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West was amongst the earliest properties recognized by the City for its heritage value. The property also represents an early example of adaptive reuse; after the building was listed on the municipal heritage register and acquired by the Harbourfront Corporation in 1973, it was successfully reused as a media centre associated with CFMT-TV and OMNI-TV from 1979 to 2009.

 

In 2018, a Zoning By-law Amendment application (File 18 241642 STE 20 OZ)  was submitted to the City to permit a 12 storey and a 22-storey mixed-use building, containing primarily residential uses with some ground floor retail uses on the south portion of the site. The Crosse and Blackwell building is proposed to be conserved and used primarily for office uses with the potential for retail uses at grade level.  A courtyard open space is proposed centrally located on the site between the Crosse and Blackwell building and the new portion of the development. 

 

In September 2021, the City received an application for Site Plan Approval related to the proposed redevelopment of the site at 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West, which would retain the existing structure.

 

In June 2019, the More Homes, More Choice Act, 2019 (Bill 108) received Royal Assent. Schedule 11 of this Act included amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA). The Bill 108 Amendments to the OHA came into force on July 1, 2021, which included a shift in Part IV designations related to certain Planning Act applications. Section 29(1.2) of the OHA now restricts City Council's ability to give notice of its intention to designate a property under the OHA to within 90 days after the City Clerk gives notice of a complete application.

 

The designation of this property is not subject to Section 29 (1.2) since it is an application for Site Plan Approval.

 

A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) is required for all development applications that affect listed and designated properties and will be considered when determining how a heritage property is to be conserved.

 

Designation also enables City Council to review proposed alterations or demolitions to the property and enforce heritage property standards and maintenance. 

Background Information

(December 1, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Attachments 1 to 3 (CC38.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174223.pdf
(December 3, 2021) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on 545 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Notice of Intention to Designate a Property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act (CC38.16a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174241.pdf

CC38.17 - 64 King Street - Proposed Amendment to Designation By-law Under Part IV, Section 30.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (CC38.17a with recommendations)

Origin

(December 1, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Recommendations

The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that:

 

1.  City Council state its intention to propose an amendment to City of Toronto By-Law 2970-78, designating the property at 64 King Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to update and revise the Statement of Significance: 64 King Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment 3 to the report (December 1, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.  City Council provide notice of the proposed amendment to By-Law 2970-78 to the owner of the designated property in accordance with sections 30.1(3) and 30.1(4) of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.  If there are no objections to the amendment of the by-law in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council to amend By-Law 2970-78.

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to amend the former Borough of York By-Law 2970-78, and in so doing, update the Statement of Significance designating the property at 64 King Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, to reflect the 2021 amendments to the Act and Ontario Regulation 9/06 of the Act, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation.

 

The property was designated in 1978 by the Council of the former Borough of York.  The Reasons for Designation does not include a statement of the cultural heritage value or a description of heritage attributes of the property. On October 1, 2021, City Council directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to review the statement of significance for the Tyrrell House at 64 King Street, and to report on the recommendations to amend the designation By-law 2970-78 to update the cultural heritage values and attributes in accordance with the 2021 amendments to the Act, for City Council consideration by December 15, 2021. 

 

The property at 64 King Street is located at the northeast corner of Rosemount Avenue and King Street. Known as the "Tyrrell House," it contains the original main dwelling fronting King Street and the original two-storey rear wing fronting Rosemount Avenue. The property was designed by and built for William Tyrrell, a successful politician in York Township and the Village of Weston and an architect, carpenter, and builder, as his grand estate in 1859. The subject property is amongst one of the first and largest properties constructed in the historic Village of Weston east of the railway tracks. The Tyrrell family continued to own the property until c.1920.

 

Staff have completed the Research and Evaluation Report for the property at 64 King Street and determined that the property meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the criteria prescribed for municipal designation under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act under design and physical, historical and associative, and contextual value. As such, the property is a significant built heritage resource. The property at 64 King Street is considered a local landmark as it contributes to a sense of place within the Weston neighbourhood and is valued by the local community as a significant part of the area's history and present-day context.

 

A Consent Application was submitted by the owner on May 5, 2021 to obtain consent to sever the designated property into two residential lots. Two Minor Variance applications were also submitted on May 5, 2021 to maintain the existing historic detached dwelling and to construct a new detached dwelling with an attached garage. The Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York has scheduled a public hearing on November 16, 2021.

 

A Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) is required for all development applications that affect listed and designated properties and will be considered when determining how a heritage property is to be conserved. Designation also enables City Council to review proposed alterations or demolitions to the property and enforce heritage property standards and maintenance. 

Background Information

(December 1, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 64 King Street - Proposed Amendment to Designation By-law Under Part IV, Section 30.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Attachments 1 to 3 (CC38.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174224.pdf
(December 3, 2021) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on 64 King Street - Proposed Amendment to Designation By-law Under Part IV, Section 30.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act (CC38.17a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174243.pdf

CC38.18 - Appointment of Public Members to the Committee of Adjustment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1024 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual who is being considered for appointment to the Committee of Adjustment.

Origin

(December 2, 2021) Letter from the Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment

 

The Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint the following two public members, one each to the North York and
Scarborough panels of the Committee of Adjustment, for a term of office ending November 14,
2022, and until successors are appointed:

 

Natasha Manning – North York Panel
Igor Samardzic – Scarborough Panel

 

2. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 to 6 to the report (November 16, 2021)
from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about
identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Committee of Adjustment.

 

Candidates' biographies

 

Natasha Manning

 

Natasha Manning is a lawyer licensed with the Law Society of Ontario. She received her Juris Doctor (J.D.) degree from Osgoode Hall Law School, and holds an Honours Bachelor of Social Science (SCocSC) with a Double Major in Public Administration and Criminology from the University of Ottawa. She has practiced Administrative Law for over seven years and currently specializes in Immigration Law at a Nonprofit Organization in Toronto. Throughout her career Natasha has appeared as a lawyer before numerous administrative tribunals. She has worked in the private sector, for the Federal Government, and for non-profit organizations. Throughout Natasha's legal career she has worked in some of Toronto's most underprivileged neighborhoods serving diverse and often vulnerable clients.

 

Igor Samardzic

 

Igor Samardzic has a Master of Science in Urban Planning from the University of Toronto. Igor holds a B.A. from the University of Toronto. He has over 10 years of experience in community organizing and advocacy work. He is a strong advocate for people with disabilities and believes that they are in integral part of community building. He believes all residents should have the opportunity to engage with the city and planning process.

Summary

At its meeting on December 2, 2021, the Nominating Panel – Committee of Adjustment
considered Item NA10.1 - Agenda Item History - 2021.NA10.1 (toronto.ca) and made
recommendations to City Council regarding candidates for appointment to the Committee of
Adjustment.

Background Information

(December 2, 2021) Decision letter from the Nominating Panel - Committee of Adjustment on Appointment of Public Members to the Committee of Adjustment (CC38.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174257.pdf
(November 16, 2021) Report from the City Clerk on the Appointment of Public Members to the Committee of Adjustment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174258.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2
Confidential Attachment 3
Confidential Attachment 4
Confidential Attachment 5
Confidential Attachment 6

CC38.19 - Property Acquisition for New TTC Bus Garage and Additional Operational Uses

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or disposition of land by the City of Toronto (the "City").

Origin

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management

Recommendations

The City Manager and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management recommend:

 

1. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, to negotiate and execute a Letter of Intent, agreement of purchase and sale and any additional or ancillary agreements required for the acquisition of the Property identified in Confidential Attachment 1 of this report, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Confidential Attachment 1 of this report, and on such other additional or amended terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Deputy City Manager, Corporate Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 of this report, and Toronto Transit Commission Board Transmittal - Confidential Attachment 1 and that the information remain confidential at this time as it pertains to a proposed or pending acquisition of land.

 

3. City Council authorize the public release of Confidential Attachment 1 of this report and Toronto Transit Commission Board Transmittal - Confidential Attachment 1 following the closing of any purchase transaction and any other related ancillary agreements.

 

4. City Council forward this report, City of Toronto Confidential Attachment 1, City of Toronto Attachment 2 - Toronto Transit Commission Board Transmittal, and Toronto Transit Commission Board Transmittal - Confidential Attachment 1, be forwarded to the CreateTO Board for their information.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council approval for the City to move forward on the strategic acquisition of a suitable industrial property (the "Property") for the future site of a new Toronto Transit Commission ("T.T.C.") garage and maintenance facility (the "10th Garage"). The Property is ideally situated and can offer interim T.T.C. uses until such time that a garage on the Property is constructed. Given the parcel size, additional long-term T.T.C. uses could be incorporated during the Property’s redevelopment process. The description of the Property, its suitability and terms and conditions of the acquisition are described in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report. The Property is considered to be a strategic acquisition that aligns with the T.T.C. Capital Investment Plan 2021-2035, it's Real Estate Investment Plan, CreateTO's Industrial Portfolio Strategy, and the Council-adopted Strategic Acquisition Policy under City-Wide Real Estate model.  

 

On December 8, 2021, the Toronto Transit Commission Board approved recommendations concerning this strategic acquisition and is available for City Council review as an attachment to this City report.

Background Information

(December 8, 2021) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on Property Acquisition for New Toronto Transit Commission Bus Garage and Additional Operational Uses (CC38.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174271.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Public Attachment 2 - Toronto Transit Commission Board Transmittal on Property Acquisition for New Toronto Transit Commission Bus Garage
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-174273.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Transit Commission Board Transmittal

Member Motions - Meeting 38

MM38.1 - Request the Government of Ontario Help to Stop Out-of-Control Housing Prices by Imposing a Home Speculation and Home Flipping Tax - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor John Filion

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Government of Ontario to introduce a Home Speculation and Home Flipping Tax to help stop the extreme increases in home prices driven by land speculators and home flippers in the City of Toronto.

Summary

Given the out of control, hyper escalation of home prices in Toronto, making housing affordability impossible for most Torontonians, and given that these out of control housing prices are fueled by real estate speculators and home flippers ("investors") who are buying multiple properties other than their primary residence, it's time for the Ontario Government to stop out-of-control housing prices by re-imposing a Land Speculation Tax to stop home speculators from unfairly driving up the cost of housing in Toronto to unprecedented levels.

 

Recent data from the Toronto Regional Real Estate Board shows that home prices in the City rose by an alarming 22 percent over the last year making the average selling price for a resale house or condo $1.16 million (up from $955,889 which was last November’s average).

 

This explosion in housing costs is being fueled in large part by home speculators who are purchasing multiple homes and flipping them for huge profits. According to Teranet, an unprecedented 25 percent of all property sales in Toronto are now to land speculators (so called "investors") up from 16 percent in 2011.

 

According to research by the Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation, home prices in Canada have risen 30 percent since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic and land speculation is partially to blame. Canadian Mortgage and Housing Corporation Chief Economist, Brad Dugan says that's “something that worries [him] because that adds extra froth to the market, pushes home prices higher and can create a harder landing if and when the market turns and prices correct.”

 

When Toronto was facing a similar problem in the early 1970s, Ontario Premier Bill Davis implemented a 50 percent Land Speculation Tax on people buying and selling homes that were not their principal residence. This tax is credited with slowing the extreme increase in property values in Toronto in the 1970s.

 

Urgent action is needed to help stop the extreme increase in home prices in Toronto, driven by home flippers and land speculators who treat housing like a Bitcoin-type commodity.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174189.pdf

Communications

(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Joe Lombardi (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Michael Lauber (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Greer Wright (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Jeffrey Stutz (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Marvyne Jenoff (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Laura Lamarche (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Susan Pink (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Shauna Corbin (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Laraine Naft (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Brent McGaw (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Gail Axmith (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Harold B. Smith (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Patricia and William Clark (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Seboua March (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Dawn Scott (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Terry Lobo (MM.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Naomi Miller (MM.Supp)
(December 12, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/comm/communicationfile-142490.pdf
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Zeesy Powers (MM.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Murray Margolis (MM.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Annie Brelih and Wayne Robinson (MM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) E-mail from Frank Miller and Wendy Orbach (MM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Ena and Moshe Greengarten (MM.Supp)
(December 14, 2021) E-mail from Maureen Kapral (MM.Supp)

MM38.2 - Authorization to Release Section 37 funds to Fund the Production and Installation of a Heritage Plaque to Recognize the Significance of the Andrew Mercer Reformatory - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommend that:

 

1.  City Council increase the Approved 2021 Operating Budget for Heritage Toronto on a one-time basis by $7,500.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained from the development at 165 and 171 East Liberty Street (Source Account: XR3026-3701057), for the production and installation of a heritage plaque to recognize the significance of the Andrew Mercer Reformatory for Women (Cost Centre: HG0001).

Summary

This Motion seeks authorization to release $7,500 in Section 37 funds to Heritage Toronto for the creation and installation of a heritage plaque to recognize the significance of the Andrew Mercer Reformatory for Women.

 

Opened in 1880, the Andrew Mercer Reformatory for Women was the first reformatory and prison in Canada built exclusively for women. The province used $90,000 from the estate of philanthropist Andrew Mercer to build the facility on King Street West, near Dufferin Street, where Allan Lamport Stadium now stands. Its original capacity was for 250 women, with a 50-person wing devoted to the imprisonment of girls under 14.

 

In addition to confining women, the Reformatory also aimed to teach women Victorian virtues such as domesticity, servility, and obedience. Incarcerated women performed household chores and were ostensibly taught cooking, baking, sewing, and knitting.

 

Within the first ten years of operation, the success of the reformatory was in question. Employees claimed there was little reforming of women and mostly forced labour, confinement, and abuse. Ontario’s Female Refuges Act (1897-1964) was used to arrest and imprison girls and women if they were thought to be “incorrigible” or “unmanageable”, found begging, drunk, or were suspected of leading an idle or dissolute life; vague terms that could be applied to anything deemed immoral. Anyone could bring these charges forward. After 1913, a change was made to the Andrew Mercer Reformatory Act to allow indeterminate sentences.

 

Canadian legal scholar and historian, Constance Backhouse, has highlighted abuses inflicted on women in the institution, including Velma Demerson, who was one of the few people to receive compensation for her time at the Reformatory, and Muriel Walker. These women were subjected to several involuntary medical procedures by the reformatory doctor.

 

After years of allegations of abuse, a 1964 Grand Jury investigation publicly revealed what was happening at the Mercer Reformatory; medical care was inadequate, the gymnasium was unequipped and never used, the library had few books, spaces were inadequate and aging, and there were no real education classes. The Reformatory was finally closed and demolished in 1969 and inmates were moved to the Vanier Centre for Women in Brampton, Ontario. The former superintendent’s house at 1177 King Street West is the only part of the Mercer Reformatory complex that remains. The majority of the former site is occupied by Lamport Stadium, which was built in 1974.

 

This Heritage Toronto plaque will provide public education about the Mercer Reformatory and the abuses suffered by women incarcerated there. Heritage Toronto will conduct additional research and consult with stakeholders during the creation of this plaque.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174275.pdf

MM38.3 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from the Development at 21 Old Mill Road to Lakeshore Arts for Mural Art at Stephen Drive - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommend that:

 

1. City Council increase the approved 2021 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $3,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 21 Old Mill Road (Source Account: XR3026-3700443) for the purpose of creating a mural using the South Humber Park and Humber River as inspiration (Cost Centre: NP2161).

 
2. City Council direct the funds to be forwarded to Lakeshore Arts upon the signing of an undertaking by Lakeshore Arts that governs the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

The Sunnylea-Stonegate Neighbourhood Association has partnered with the Neighbourhood Love Collective and Lakeshore Arts on a Gateway Mural on Stephen Drive, just north of the Queensway. They will hold two information sessions, survey, winter nature walk and an art making workshop and ideas gathered through these consultations will inform the mural design concept. This is an incredible opportunity to help brighten up our community, enhance our public space, and increase the accessibility of art in our neighbourhood.

 

The requirement for funding is that the mural must be strongly associated with a theme based on our community's heritage. The Sunnylea-Stonegate Neighbourhood Association's theme is centered on the Humber River being honoured as a Canadian Heritage River, which will comply with the requirements of the funding.

 

Section 37 funds have been secured and received from the development at 21 Old Mill Road for Heritage improvements along the Humber River. The intent of this Motion is to transfer a total of $3,000 of Section 37 funds from the development to Lakeshore Arts to provide one-time capital funding for the purpose of creating a mural using the South Humber Park and Humber River as inspiration. The initial mural concept is a site-specific design honouring the natural environment right next to the mural site. By representing and painting the Humber River and its flora and fauna that inhabit the Sunnylea-Stonegate neighbourhoods, the mural will celebrate this Canadian Heritage River and the community’s relationship with it.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174190.pdf

MM38.4 - Budgeting for the City of Toronto’s Future - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Manager and the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to prepare a report of outstanding Council approved budget requests, operational costs, and capital improvements in advance of determining the tax-supported budget.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer to recommend options for additional revenue streams to support meeting the above budget necessities in advance of determining the tax support budget, including, but not limited to, options for:

 

a.  Sales Revenue Tax; and

 

b.  Vehicle Registration Tax.

Summary

COVID-19 has laid bare systemic inequalities and has left the City of Toronto scrambling to fill services gaps. Chronic underfunding of necessary services is rampant and leaves residents without essential services. In order to adequately address service gaps, and chronic underfunding, the City of Toronto needs to re-evaluate how we determine the tax-supported budget.

 

Historically, the City of Toronto evaluated budgetary needs and then determined the tax-supported rate for residents. In 2010, Mayor Rob Ford changed this process. Since then, the City of Toronto has determined the tax-supported budget rate and then discussed which services get funded through the budget. As we recover from COVID-19, it is critical that this process be re-evaluated.

 

The Federal and Provincial governments have not sufficiently responded to the City’s continued calls for financial support around integral services like supportive, affordable, and transitional housing and mental health and addictions services. In order to support the needs of the residents of Toronto, we need to consider how we can better address underserved City divisions. If we truly wish to have a recovery for all, we each need to invest in our future and the vision of our City.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174191.pdf

MM38.5 - Traffic Safety Review of Dundas Street East and Sherbourne Street - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Toronto Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake a traffic safety review of the intersection of Dundas Street East and Sherbourne Street and provide recommendations for enhanced road safety features as soon as possible and for rapid installation of these measures included in a report to the January 6, 2022 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.

 

2.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider installing a Red Light Camera at Dundas Street East and Sherbourne Street and to report back to the January meeting of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on the feasibility of this installation.

 

3.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider placing an Automated Speed Enforcement device at the corner of Dundas Street East and Sherbourne Street and to report back to the January meeting of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee on the feasibility of this installation.

 

4.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider reducing the speed limit on Sherbourne Street between Gerrard Street East and Shuter Street by ten kilometres per hour and include their findings in the report to the January 6, 2022 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.

 

5.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider increasing traffic marshalls and traffic safety support when construction is taking place near the intersection during peak traffic hours and include their findings in the report to the January 6, 2022 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.

Summary

On November 18, 2021 a member of the Toronto Centre community was killed in a tragic traffic accident at the corner of Dundas Street East and Sherbourne Street. This individual was previously involved in a separate traffic related incident that also took place at the same intersection. This individual was the second person killed at this intersection in the last six months.

The Dundas and Sherbourne area has a significant homeless population either living in local shelters or visiting the area daily for services.  We have seen for years that they are at added risk to vehicular injury if they are left to fend for themselves without sustained and appropriate social support.

 

A safety review of this area is needed to accurately assess and address the longstanding safety challenges that have increased in recent years due to the COVID-19 pandemic as well as other contributing social and economic factors. 

 

Dundas Street East and Sherbourne Street sees a high volume of fast moving traffic. The area is also busy with pedestrians. Many people who seek refuge on the corner are impacted by extreme poverty, homelessness, poor sleep, mobility issues, physical and mental health issues and high levels of stress increasing vulnerability to traffic accidents. The result is a high risk area for both pedestrians and motorists. It is for these very complex reasons why a traffic safety review of the area is so badly needed.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174193.pdf

MM38.6 - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events in January to March 2022 - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommend that: 

 

1. City Council grant an exemption to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 636 – Public Squares and former City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 237 – Nathan Phillips Square to allow the Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, Clan and Scottish Societies of Canada, Baycrest Foundation, Parks Forestry and Recreation, City of Toronto and Hockey Canada Foundation to organize their events at Nathan Phillips Square.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, to continue to work with Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, Clan and Scottish Societies of Canada, Baycrest Foundation, Parks Forestry and Recreation, City of Toronto and Hockey Canada Foundation to assess viability, based on ongoing public health directions, provincial emergency orders, and any risks associated with these events.

 

3. City Council grant permission to Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation's Toronto Maple Leafs Outdoor Practice to solicit donations, engage in sports demonstrations, amplify sound outside of the Nathan Phillips Square amplification schedule policy, use open flame as part of their event production, operate beer/wine garden, and place objects in the pool.

 

4. City Council grant permission to Clan and Scottish Societies of Canada's Great Canadian Kilt Skate to solicit donations and engage in sports demonstrations.

 

5. City Council grant permission to Baycrest Foundation's Pro-Am Winter Warm up to solicit donations, engage in sports demonstration, amplify sound outside of Nathan Phillips Square amplification schedule policy and place objects in the pool.

 

6. City Council grant permission to Parks Forestry and Recreation, City of Toronto's Family Day to solicit donations, and engage in sports demonstrations.

 

7. City Council grant permission to Hockey Canada Foundation's Dreams Come True to solicit donations, engage in sports demonstration, amplify sound outside of the Nathan Phillips Square amplification schedule policy and place objects in the pool.

Summary

The purpose of this Motion is to request exemptions from Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 636 – Public Squares and former City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 237.

 

Arts and Cultural Services recently started accepting applications from not-for-profit or charitable organizations for events at Nathan Phillips Square in the first quarter of 2022. To date, sixty five applications have been received and are presently being reviewed by staff.

 

The issuance of the permits for these events will be conditional on adherence to any public health restrictions that may remain in place due to COVID-19. In addition, all third party event organizers must comply with local public health guidance on COVID-19 including but not limited to COVID – 19 Guidance for Indoor and Outdoor Events and Gathering issued by Toronto Public Health and follow the Reopening Guidelines for Nathan Phillips Square.

 

Several organizations have requested to hold events in January to March 2022, for which Nathan Phillips Square By-Law exemptions are required and need Council approval.

 

Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment Foundation, Clans and Scottish Society of Canada, Baycrest Foundation, Parks Forestry and Recreation, City of Toronto and Hockey Canada Foundation will be responsible for submitting installation plans to the permit-issuing body and monitoring on-site operations in a manner that maintains compliance with all public health guidelines and best practices.

 

There are no financial impacts associated with the adoption of this motion. The City will be compensated by the event organizers for any cost incurred  as a result of these various events and the approval of requested exemptions to the Municipal Code through the appropriates Divisions.  

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174173.pdf

MM38.7 - Recognizing the Needs of Entrepreneurs, and the Evolving Economy as it Relates to Housing Affordability (Rental and Ownership) within the Municipal Comprehensive Review and Our Plan Toronto Process - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Thompson and Councillor Mark Grimes, recommend that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consider the evolving needs of entrepreneurs in the new economy and the challenges of housing affordability when assessing and making recommendations within the upcoming Municipal Comprehensive Review and Our Plan Toronto process.

Summary

As described in the City of Toronto’s Official Plan, over the next 30 years Toronto will continue to grow and change. It is expected that by 2051 a minimum of 700,000 people will move to the city and call Toronto home. Over that same time period, an additional 450,000 jobs will be created for people to work in Toronto. In total, by 2051 it is predicted that Toronto will grow to a population of at least 3.6 million and have a job market with more than two million jobs.

 

As more Canadians enter the workforce and unemployment pressures affect people's outlook on their jobs and careers, the City of Toronto must ensure that its Planning frameworks and methodology recognize changing needs to ensure that new policies incorporate and foster growth and prosperity. 

 

The COVID-19 pandemic and the significant changes to the workplace has escalated the need to adapt our planning and land use policies to accommodate this changing workplace environment. 

 

As the economy adapts to the “new norm” with respect to business and entrepreneurs, the City of Toronto must ensure that planning policies  and assessment of land use recognizes and adapts to these circumstances.

 

According to the Future of Entrepreneurship in Canada Report by Intuit Canada, 1 in 5 Canadians started their own business within the past year, resulting in approximately 2 million more entrepreneurs totaling 9 million entrepreneurs. 

 

Housing affordability is a well-known challenge in the City of Toronto and is expected to be for the foreseeable future. This is true for young entrepreneurs that are pursuing their dreams of owning their own business. The need for affordable office space in tandem with the need for housing affordability creates opportunities to potentially address both issues through a contemporary approach to land use planning and developments that recognize the need for a truly Live/Work design. 

 

It is important that the Municipal Comprehensive Review and Our Plan Toronto recognize our evolving economy and the importance of land use planning as it relates to young entrepreneurs, particularly within the Black, Indigenous and people of colour, and Two Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Intersex, Queer, Questioning, communities. 

 

The City of Toronto has recognized the need to provide support to entrepreneurs through Enterprise Toronto which offers a number of important services, including Business Boot Camps, Business Plan review and one-on-one support. Incorporating the needs of entrepreneurs within the Planning process is a complementary step that will be consistent with the City of Toronto’s support and encouragement of entrepreneurship.

 

Live/Work development projects can assist the City in accommodating the types of employment anticipated in the future such as creative and knowledge-based economies and provide opportunities to address the changing nature of employment and living, such as small local businesses who seek space with access to transit in mixed-use communities and the growing trend for live-work, work-from home.

 

Within the City of Toronto, there are potential opportunities to develop a mix of commercial office, retail and residential uses that can support provincial and municipal policy objectives for economic development, creating complete communities that include live-work opportunities and transit-supportive densities.

 

This Motion is urgent as the Municipal Comprehensive Review and Our Plan Toronto process is currently underway with a provincially mandated deadline for municipalities to complete their review by July 1, 2022.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174174.pdf

MM38.8 - Urgent Support for Young People’s Theatre - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the General Government and Licencing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to amend the City’s lease, dated December 1, 2020, between the Young People’s Theatre as “tenant,” and the City of Toronto, as “landlord,” to permit the tenant to complete Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning repairs with their own contractor and to be reimbursed by the City of Toronto through Economic, Development and Culture's 2022 Capital Budget.

 
2.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to administer the release of the following payments to the Young People’s Theatre for up to $600,000 in eligible expenses related to the replacement of the Tenant's entire Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning system.

Summary

The purpose of this Motion is to seek City Council authority to amend the terms of
the lease agreement with Young People’s Theatre (the “Tenant”) and the City (the “Landlord”) to allow the Tenant to complete the necessary Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning system repair through their own hired contractor and be compensated by the City.

 

Young People's Theatre is a charitable, not-for-profit arts organization providing professional theatre programming for children, youth and families, and one of the most respected companies in North America. They have continuously occupied the purpose-built theatre at 165 Front Street East since 1977 and steward the facility since then. Young People's Theatre has a below market rent lease with the City that was entered into in August 2010 and renewed in 2020.

 

The Tenant has been without a fully-functioning Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning system since 2019. The current terms of the lease stipulate that the Tenant is responsible for all capital improvements, including Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning. However, Economic Development and Culture has traditionally supported this work as often tenants are not well positioned to do so. Due to the timing of the tender and budget process, the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning replacement may not be possible until the summer of 2022, or later, thus delaying the planned re-opening. Young People's Theatre is currently undertaking a significant renovation of the space with their own funds. The Tenant is in the unique position of having construction management and engineering expertise on hand to expedite the process, and the ability to cash flow the project in advance of reimbursement from the City.

 

 In order to facilitate the successful reopening of this important cultural facility, after a very challenging year for the arts, it is recommended that this amendment be approved so that Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning replacement can occur in advance of a spring 2022 opening.

 

Funding of $0.600 million for Young People's Theatre is part of the Economic Development and Culture's 2022-2031 Capital Budget and Plan through the 2022 process for City Council consideration.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174175.pdf

MM38.9 - Liquor Licence Application - Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario - 1512 Dundas Street West - Fifteen Twelve Salon File 1314335 - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that: 

1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Fifteen Twelve Salon, 1512 Dundas Street West, Toronto (the “Premises”) is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor license application.

 

2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

A liquor licence application has been submitted for Fifteen Twelve Salon, 1512 Dundas Street West, Toronto.  This application is being opposed as it does not have community support for approval and is not in the community interest.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174196.pdf

MM38.10 - Liquor Licence Application - Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario - 846 College Street - ARO College Street Market - by Councillor Ana Bailao, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailao, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommend that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for ARO College Street Market, 846 College Street, Toronto (the “Premises”) is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

A liquor licence application has been submitted for ARO College Street Market, 846 College Street, Toronto.  This application is being opposed as it does not have community support for approval and is not in the community interest.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174194.pdf

MM38.11 - Rail Traffic Bell Ringing Noise Mitigation Strategies - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommend that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure and Development Services to engage with the President and Chief Executive Officer of Metrolinx, and appropriate staff of the Provincial transit agency, to request and require that they develop and outline how they will cease the use of bell ringing by trains within the City of Toronto and City Council request that a relevant update report be provided to the March 24, 2022 Economic and Community Development Committee.

Summary

The challenges of urban living in the City of Toronto are clear to all who call the City home. Many of these are issues which cannot be easily resolved but those that can significantly improve quality of life in our communities must be addressed. One such issue that has significantly impacted residents in my Davenport community, and communities surrounding it, is bell-ringing associated with trains operated by the Provincial transit agency, Metrolinx (GO Transit).

 

As ward Councillor for the Davenport community, I have joined with local residents in calling on Metrolinx to mitigate the impacts on quality of life associated with the bell-ringing connected to their trains. Metrolinx had committed to a pilot project to consider alternatives but there is no indication that this initiative has actually commenced and the lack of clarity on this messaging has created confusion. For some time Metrolinx had maintained that federal railway legislation precluded them from ending or seeking alternatives to bell-ringing.  Correspondence from the then federal Minister of Transport in 2019 clearly stated that this was not the case for rail lines operated by Metrolinx and therefore alternatives to bell-ringing can be safely put in place.

 

This is just not a local community issue for residents of Davenport or nearby neighbourhoods. As well as existing provincial rail infrastructure, major rail transit projects are either underway or will soon commence. The issue of bell-ringing is impacting many communities like the Davenport community but with transit expansion planned and underway this will become an exponentially increasing issue at many stations.

 

As a City, we must take the initiative to ensure that Metrolinx undertakes meaningful and expeditious actions that will lead to solutions both in the short and long term to the issue of loud bell-ringing from their trains.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174198.pdf

MM38.12 - 86 Foch Avenue - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke - Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Michael Ford, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor, and any other appropriate City Staff, to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body in respect of 86 Foch Avenue to uphold the Committee of Adjustment’s refusal of the Applicant’s proposed development (Committee of Adjustment Application Number A0112/21EYK).

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment seeking permission to construct a new detached dwelling with an attached garage at 86 Foch Avenue (Application Number A0112/21EYK).

 

In particular, the applicant seeks variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013 and Etobicoke Zoning By-law 1979-67, including variances for lot coverage, gross floor area, front yard setback, rear yard setback, window projection, basement grade, and dwelling height.

 

On August 26, 2021, the Etobicoke York District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused to grant the requested variances (copy attached). The applicant has appealed the refusal to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. A hearing has been scheduled for February 14, 2022.

 

Community Planning staff do not support the application. On August 18, 2021, Community Planning for the Etobicoke York District wrote a report to the Committee of Adjustment recommending that the minor variances be refused (copy attached). Staff recommend refusal of the minor variances because the proposed massing and scale of the dwelling would not be in keeping with the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-laws, and would not respect nor reinforce the prevailing character of the neighbourhood.

 

Urban Forestry staff also wrote to the Committee of Adjustment on April 19, 2021 recommending refusal of the application because the proposed development would require the removal of by-law protected trees (copy attached). 

 

This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to oppose the applicant’s Toronto Local Appeal Body appeal and to secure the necessary authorization and resources to support the City’s opposition to the appeal.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174199.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke-Lakeshore Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 86 Foch Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174200.pdf
(August 18, 2021) Report from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 86 Foch Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174201.pdf
(April 19, 2021) Memorandum from the Supervisor, Tree Protection and Plan Review - West District, regarding 86 Foch Avenue.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174202.pdf

MM38.13 - Support to Theatre Museum Canada towards the Development of Cultural and Museum Space - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommend that: 

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to contribute and transfer $80,000.00 to Theatre Museum Canada from Economic Development and Culture Division's 2021 Approved Operating Budget to support the feasibility study and pre-construction costs associated with a new space for Theatre Museum Canada, consistent with Item EC8.6 – Establishing  Strategic Priorities for Culture Investment (2020 – 2024) adopted by City Council at its meeting on October 29 and 30, 2019.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to negotiate, enter into and execute a funding agreement on behalf of the City with Theatre Museum Canada on such terms deemed necessary and appropriate by the Acting General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Summary

The intent of this Motion is to approve a financial contribution in the amount of $80,000 to The Theatre Museum Corporation (operating as Theatre Museum Canada), a registered charity to develop cultural and interpretive museum space.

 

Since 2011, the City and Theatre Museum Canada, have been working together to find cultural space appropriate for a small arts and heritage organization with the following mission: "We invite the world to explore and be inspired by the past, present and future of Canadian theatre", and vision: "Our vision is a Canada that values all shared expressions of theatre by all people as essential and enriching elements in our social fabric." Securing space for Theatre Museum Canada would help to preserve Toronto's heritage as a major theatre centre while also creating a new cultural tourism amenity for the city.

 
Theatre Museum Canada will develop a renovation proposal, sustainable, long term funding (capital and operating) and fundraising plan for the potential space, architectural plans, and a long term programming and events plan. In order to do this in a timely fashion, the Theatre Museum requires the support of the City.

 

Funding is required before the end of 2021 to support Theatre Museum Canada's funding applications to other orders of government, and to enable the organization to proceed with planning. The proposed support is consistent with Recommendation 18 to "preserve existing and create new, affordable spaces for culture across the City" of the "Building Back Stronger: Report of the Economic and Culture Recovery Advisory Group" adopted as amended by City Council in Item EC18.15 on December 16, 17 and 18, 2020.

 

Theatre Museum Canada's pursuit of public cultural programming space meets the City's policies and priorities consistent with Item EC8.6 – Establishing  Strategic Priorities for Culture Investment (2020 – 2024) adopted by City Council at its meeting on October 29 and 30, 2019 and supports Toronto's arts, heritage and culture community at large. Any delays in securing Council approval may result in financial hardship to Theatre Museum Canada.

 

The proposed one-time financial contribution for Theatre Museum Canada is $80,000 and funding will be accommodated within the 2021 Approved Operating Budget for Economic Development and Culture.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174203.pdf

MM38.14 - Authority to Accept Donation from Krista Kim Studio Incorporated for Museums and Heritage Services, Programming - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommend that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to accept a donation of $0.150 million from Krista Kim Studio Incorporated in compliance with the Donations to the City of Toronto for Community Benefits Policy.

 

2.  City Council increase the 2021 Council Approved Operating Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $0.150 million gross, $0 net, funded by the donation to be paid to Museums and Heritage Services, programming.

Summary

Krista Kim through Krista Kim Studio Incorporated wishes to provide a donation of $150,000 to support the City of Toronto’s Museums and Heritage Services programming. These funds pending, approval from Council, would be paid to the City at the end of December 2021.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174204.pdf

MM38.15 - Liquor License Application - Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario - 87 Wade Avenue -Unit 102B - Con-nois-seur Wine Imports Inc. File 364527 - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommend that: 

 

1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Con-nois-seur, 87 Wade Avenue Unit 102B, Toronto (the “Premises”) is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor license application.

 

2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

A liquor licence application has been submitted for Con-nois-seur, 87 Wade Avenue Unit 102B, Toronto.  This application is being opposed as it does not have community support for approval and is not in the community interest.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174205.pdf

MM38.16 - Representation at Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing for 324 & 324A High Park Avenue - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to a Toronto Local Appeal Body Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommend that:

 

1.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to seek party status in the appeal of the Committee of Adjustment's refusals of Applications A0913/21TEY and A0680/21TEY for 324 and 324A High Park Avenue, and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body hearing(s), with appropriate City staff, in opposition to the proposal.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeals and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeals at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

Each applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Applications A0680/21TEY and A0913/21TEY) (the "Applications") seeking permission to construct parking pads in the front yards of the existing detached dwellings on adjacent properties and to modify the front yard landscaping.

 

More specifically, each of the Applications request similar variances from the front yard soft landscaping requirements set out in Zoning By-law 569-2013 and the prohibition on front yard parking spaces.

 

City Planning provided reports to the Committee of Adjustment dated October 13, 2021 recommending refusal of each of the Applications (copies attached). At its hearing on October 20, 2021, the Committee of Adjustment refused both of the Applications (the "Decisions"). The Notices of Decision are attached. The applicants appealed the Decisions on November 5, 2021.

 

This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to seek party status in the appeal of the Decisions and to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body with appropriate City Staff or outside consultants, in order to oppose the minor variances requested in the Applications. This Motion will also give the City Solicitor authority to negotiate a settlement of the appeal and retain outside consultants as necessary.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174206.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission/Consent for 324A High Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174210.pdf
(October 13, 2021) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 324A High Park Avenue Committee of Adjustment Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174208.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission/Consent for 324 High Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174211.pdf
(October 13, 2021) report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on 324 High Park Avenue Committee of Adjustment Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174297.pdf

MM38.17 - Amendment to Subdivision Agreement for 980 Lansdowne Avenue - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommend that: 

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to amend the Subdivision Agreement registered on title to the lands identified as Block 3 and Block 6 on Plan 66M2496 at 980 Lansdowne Avenue to require the owner to convey to the City a road widening for the purpose of providing sufficient space to accommodate a left-turn lane from Brandon Avenue to Lansdowne Avenue.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other City staff to take such actions or require any conditions as necessary to give effect to the conveyance in Part 1 above.

Summary

This Motion will permit the City Solicitor and staff to amend the Subdivision Agreement in order to take the road widening in advance of the Notice of Approval Conditions.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174207.pdf

MM38.18 - Authorization for Non-Competitive Process for Supportive Housing Operators - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommend that: 

 

1. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to work with the Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness and Miziwe Biik Development Corporation to engage the non-profit sector and select suitable operators to lease and operate the new Federally-funded affordable rental housing being created at 222 Spadina Avenue and 292-296 Parliament Street through a non-competitive process for an initial five-year term, with an option to extend the term for up to 5 additional years, (prioritizing those with extensive supportive housing management experience), and subsequently conduct a competitive process to select operators for longer term leasing and operation of the properties, in the event that no successful proponent(s) are identified through the open Request for Proposals.

 

2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, to negotiate, approve and execute, on behalf of the City, nominal rent leases or below market rent leases and related agreements with each of the non-profit housing operators that may be selected through the process referred to in Part 1 above for up to five (5) years, with an option to extend the term for up to 5 additional years, on such terms and conditions acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, in consultation with the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City, municipal housing facility agreements (the City's "Contribution Agreement") with the non-profit housing providers that may be selected through the processes referred to in Part 1 above, to secure the financial assistance being provided and to set out the terms of the operation of the new affordable rental housing, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

Summary

The Federal government announced phase one the Rapid Housing Initiative in September 2020, which included an allocation of $203 million under the Major Cities stream to the City of Toronto to create a minimum of 540 new affordable and supportive homes.

 

The City of Toronto has used this funding to acquire properties and convert them into permanent affordable housing, as well as to develop new modular housing for people experiencing homelessness as an urgent response to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. The acquisition, conversion and construction of these properties will be completed throughout 2021 and into early 2022.

 

On October 27, 28 and 30, 2020, City Council adopted Item MM25.32 authorizing, among other things, the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat, in consultation with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to issue a Request for Proposals and to select non-profit housing providers to operate the affordable and supportive housing units to be developed under phase one of Rapid Housing Initiative.

 

A Request for Proposals for Indigenous housing providers to operate the Rapid Housing Initiative phase one sites at 222 Spadina Avenue and 292-296 Parliament Street was issued by the City of Toronto on November 9, 2021 and will close on December 17, 2021. To ensure that the sites can be ready for occupancy in early 2022, this Motion recommends that the Executive Director, Housing Secretariat be authorized to undertake a non-competitive process, in collaboration with the Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness and Miziwe Biik Development Corporation, to identify qualified operators in the event that no successful proponent is identified through the Request for Proposals process. This non-competitive process, should it be used, would help ensure that the sites can be opened upon completion of construction to move people experiencing homelessness into permanent affordable homes with appropriate supports, thereby relieving pressure from the City's shelter system.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174212.pdf

MM38.19 - Direction to Report on Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation's Appointment of its First Chief Executive Officer - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommend that: 

 

1. City Council, as Shareholder, direct the Board of Directors of the Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation to report to City Council on the decision of the Board appointing the first Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and on its Senior Executive Compensation Policy.

Summary

The newly established Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation represents an important step forward in the implementation of the City's Tenants First project and the Toronto Seniors Strategy, and the objective of improving support of vulnerable seniors in social housing.

 

As the Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation is in a developmental phase, it is critically important that the corporation is aligned and collaborating with the City as it prepares to assume operations of approximately 14,000 seniors-designated social housing units.

 

Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation currently has a Transitional Lead and Chief Corporate Officer and the corporation has initiated a search for its first Chief Executive Officer. Under the shareholder direction the core mandate of Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation includes supporting aging in place through the delivery of the Council-approved Integrated Service Model.  The reporting to City Council on the selection of Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation's first Chief Executive Officer will facilitate the alignment of City and Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation decisions during this phase and going forward.

 

Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation is a corporation created under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), and City of Toronto is its sole shareholder. Section 5(g) of the Council-approved shareholder direction to the Corporation authorizes the Board of Directors to appoint its Chief Executive Officer and section 11.2 requires the board to adopt a Senior Executive compensation policy that is consistent with the City's Guiding Principles in the Development of Senior Executive Compensation Policies for City agencies and corporations. In addition to the shareholder direction, City Council acting as shareholder has the authority to direct the corporation to take certain actions.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174213.pdf

MM38.20 - Augmenting the City's Approach to Safe Transportation in Construction Zones - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back on best practices and policies for the safe accommodation of bicycles through or around work zones, including evaluating the potential for a "mobility squad" as used in Montreal, and make any recommendations for enhancements to the City's Guiding Principles for Cycling Safety in Work Zones and/or implementation of new policies.

Summary

In a Motion from November, Council approved a look at updating the Guiding Principles document, with respect to how we manage traffic around construction sites, including the implementation of greater safety measures for cyclists during construction activity (http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2021.MM36.18).

 

Council should look to augment this report back, due for the first quarter of 2022, to specifically include examples of best-practices regarding the implementation of new temporary bike lanes or cycling detours when a bike lane or other existing bicycle infrastructure is disrupted by longer-term construction projects and the feasibility of making these practices a permanent policy within Transportation Services.

 

We must ensure the safety of our most vulnerable road users firstly when planning traffic diversions and enforcing our by-laws to ensure that developers and contractors are not putting any road user in harm's way.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174219.pdf

Communications

(December 15, 2021) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Richard Nelson, Holly Reid, Najia Zewari, Cycle Don Valley Midtown (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/comm/communicationfile-142644.pdf

MM38.21 - Making Space to Save The Arts in Toronto - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Toronto Arts Council, to consider the feasibility of a grant which supports the promotion and preservation of independent live performance venues and art spaces in Toronto and to report back through the 2022 budget process, including but not limited to:

 

a.  a new grant stream pilot, to be administered by Toronto Arts Council;


b.  add-on to existing grant structures to direct operational funding toward obtaining, or maintaining a venue;


c.  scalable options for a variety of venue sizes, operational costs, and


d.  estimated additional funding required to implement the recommended program.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with Strategic Communications, to provide recommendations on outreach and educational campaigns promoting existing programs at the federal, provincial and municipal programs to support cultural recovery.

 

3.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report on  recommendations for granting reform for all municipal cultural granting programs to better advance Equity-deserving groups and new organizations by July 2022.

 

4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to develop comprehensive plans and policy recommendations that will sustain the arts and culture sector, including the possibility of working with for-profit organizations, structured partnerships, Business Improvements Areas, and CreateTO to  develop smart, long-term policies for operations of City-owned cultural spaces, and to report back to City Council by July 2022.

 

5.  City Council direct the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, to recommend a cost estimate for interim financial supports for arts and culture spaces through the 2022 budget process, and to consider a segregated fund to assist with the replacement of existing cultural space for artists and venue operators lost through the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and consistent with Part 18 of the Building Back Stronger Report adopted by Council December 7, 2020.

 

6.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the City Solicitor, the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, to determine recommendations for alternative location for the displaced arts organizations and vendors in the Distillery, including a review of the City's portfolio of available spaces in the Distillery District and the local community and opportunities to fill vacant storefronts and report to City Council on outcomes in 2022.

 

7.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to prioritize efforts to secure new affordable and permanent space for arts and culture uses through new development applications in the Distillery District and the local community.

 

8.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and the local Business Improvement Area, to explore the feasibility of providing pop-up storefronts and other accessible spaces from across the City for both non-profit and for-profit arts businesses and to report back to City Council in the first quarter of 2022.

Summary

Arts and culture make up the fabric of every major city, and it is integral to tourism, hospitality and the well being of life in our downtown. The arts have been a critical piece to the collective well-being of residents, and it will be essential in the recovery of the downtown and the City of Toronto.

 

Over the past two years, we have seen many businesses shutter permanently, and have seen many arts organizations lose their venues and spaces to operate and rehearse. Most recent examples are Rehearsal Factory, a substantial building dedicated to rehearsal for live music; Sterling Lofts, an intimate artistic hub, and now several artisans from the Distillery District. Not only is the loss of these arts organizations a detriment to arts and culture in Toronto, but further perpetuates empty storefronts and lost businesses to our streets.

 

If the City of Toronto is serious in its recovery, we cannot afford to forget about an investment in arts and culture, especially for the two-spirited, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, and queer (2SLGBTQ) and Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities. If we wish to remain a hub for the creative industry, we have to find creative and supportive solutions to sustain the future of arts and culture or we risk losing our innovators, creators, storytellers and performers forever. It cannot wait.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174222.pdf

MM38.22 - Supporting a Canadian Winter Tradition - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic and Community Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation to provide support matching 2020-21 service levels to community/neighbourhood groups by the end of the 2021-22 application period to ensure the success of the City's natural ice rinks, including:

 

a.  the installation, removal and storage of any hockey boards on rinks where such boards were used in the 2020-21 season.

 

b.  continued support with equipment, materials or staff time provided in the 2020-21 season.

 

c.  consultation with the local councillor in cases where any future service changes are proposed.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation to report back to the Economic and Community Development Committee by the second quarter of 2022 on support that the City can put in place to cultivate new and existing community/neighbourhood groups willing to commit their time for the success of a natural ice rink in their community.

Summary

Natural skating rinks are a winter tradition in Toronto and a fundamental Canadian winter experience.  The City of Toronto has traditionally supported 30 to 40 community groups each year to flood areas in local parks. These have created spaces relied upon by neighbourhoods for community building and for keeping active during the coldest months of the year.

 

Levels of City support for rinks has changed over time. In 2021, a number of rink organizers expressed frustration over reduced service levels proposed by City staff. In some cases, rink teams were told that support would no longer be available for installing boards to support skating or hockey. In other cases, groups were told that their boards, traditionally stored by the City, had exceeded their lifespan and were no longer available.

 

Community groups investing hours of their time in the freezing cold weather to provide low cost enhancements to City properties have a reasonable expectation of support and communication – especially when that support has been relied upon for past activities.

 

With changing weather patterns and increasing volatility, the City should be engaging with these community groups to establish what role it can play to make these rinks easier for volunteers, especially in the setting up or dismantling of infrastructure.

 

Local councillors often have regular contact with these groups and any changes to past service levels should also be considered in collaboration with their offices.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174230.pdf

MM38.23 - Green Market Acceleration Program - by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the heads of all City agencies and corporations and direct division heads to execute agreements on behalf of the City for the duration of the Green Market Acceleration Program providing for the implementation of applied research partnerships, proof of concept projects and technology demonstrations using City assets or infrastructure in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council request all City agencies and corporations and direct divisions to work with Green Market Acceleration Program through the duration of the program to assist local businesses with their applied research, proof of concept projects and technology demonstrations, supporting the development of "made in Toronto" market-based innovative solutions to real world issues and growing Toronto's economy.

 

3.  City Council request all City agencies and corporations and direct divisions to designate a green market acceleration liaison who will work with Green Market Acceleration Program staff to identify assets under their control that can be used for specific Green Market Acceleration Program projects and be the champion to help the agency, board, commission or division staff to undertake the projects.

 

4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in the report back to City Council on the Green Market Acceleration Program, to provide a report card on the efforts to support commercialization that identifies the number of Green Market Acceleration Program projects sent to each agency, corporation and division; the number of Green Market Acceleration Program projects implemented by each agency, corporation and division; and the reasons why Green Market Acceleration Program projects, if any, did not proceed.

Summary

The City of Toronto can make a major impact on the commercialization of locally made solutions to climate change by hosting demonstrations and pilots of new-to-market technologies through the Green Market Acceleration Program. This includes City divisions and the City's agencies, boards and commissions. The Green Market Acceleration Program will accelerate the reduction of green house gas emissions while at the same time increase jobs locally. 

 

In May 2018, City Council directed the Economic Development and Culture division, along with the Toronto Office of Partnerships to continue work on Green Market Acceleration Program. The direction from Council has been expanded on in the recommendations of this Motion to provide additional support for the City of Toronto's Net Zero Strategy.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174233.pdf

MM38.24 - Feasibility of Rezoning 467 Spadina Road for a Multi-unit Apartment - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the City Solicitor as necessary, to report on any zoning amendments that would be required to permit a multi-unit apartment building within the existing building envelope at 467 Spadina Road and to bring forward any required zoning by-law amendments to a statutory public meeting under the Planning Act after holding a community meeting.

Summary

The beautiful apartment at 467 Spadina Road, just north of Forest Hill Village, has been vacant since 2006 following a mass renoviction. Confirmed as heritage by Council in 2020, the property now sits as a derelict eyesore providing a home for rats instead of people.

 

A developer satisfied the rental replacement requirements under Section 111 of the Planning Act and was able to pursue a two-unit development that kept the original structure intact. That developer, however, did not follow through on their plans and sold the property.

 

Earlier this year, Councillor Matlow’s office and City Planning were approached by the new owner of the property stating their intention to revitalize the building and convert it back to a 17-unit apartment. It was determined by City Building that the applicant would have to go through Committee of Adjustment to change the project back to an apartment building after the previous two-unit project. Despite having support from City Planning and Councillor Matlow’s office, the applicant deferred their August 2021 Committee of Adjustment date stating in the Toronto Star that they now believed it would be more financially advantageous to pursue the two-unit plan.

 

Recently, the owner has put the property back on the market. This Motion requests City Staff to report on any zoning amendments required to “legalize” the existing apartment to send as strong a signal as possible to both the current owner, and any prospective one, that the City of Toronto strongly supports a multi-unit apartment at 467 Spadina Road.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174234.pdf

MM38.25 - Greater Action to Fight Auto Theft in Toronto - by Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

* Communications have been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Colle, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak, recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to engage with the Chief of Police to:

 

a. determine the resources required to re-establish a policing unit specifically dedicated to fighting the increasing problem of auto theft in Toronto; and

 

b. mandate the unit to conduct proactive investigations with partner agencies across Ontario, to ensure greater information sharing and coordination of investigations into high end auto thefts.

 

2. City Council requests Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada to recognize the urgent need to work with and provide resources to the Toronto Police Service to combat this out control criminal activity that cannot be stopped without Provincial and Federal support.

 

3. City Council call on the Government of Ontario to join with the Toronto Police Service and other municipal police services in creating a Provincial/Municipal Auto Theft Task Force to combat this epidemic of auto theft.

Summary

Auto theft has reached unprecedented and epidemic levels in Toronto and the Greater Toronto Area. The Toronto Police Service estimates that 5,347 cars have been stolen in the City so far this year. Auto theft is not a victimless crime but rather it is violent, dangerous and linked to various organized criminal activities. Cars are being stolen and carjacked right out of driveways, loaded into cargo containers and shipped out of Canadian ports to be sold overseas to help fund organized crime.

 

Auto theft does not respect municipal and provincial boundaries and according to analysis conducted by the Insurance Bureau of Canada, there were over 12,000 auto theft claims in Ontario in 2020, an increase of 55 percent between 2016-2020.[1] The value of these claims totalled $250.7 million, an increase of 149 percent over this same period. This costs all vehicle owners, especially in Toronto. A recent Toronto Star article estimates that auto insurance rates in Toronto are 13-15 percent higher than the rest of Ontario to pay for the high rate of vehicle theft in the City.

 

While auto thefts have been on the rise there is no longer a dedicated unit to address this issue in the Toronto Police Service and some other Ontario municipal police services.  In an effort to address operational priorities and pressures the unit that previously existed to address issues such as high end auto thefts was disbanded and investigations of this nature are handled at the unit level. 

 

Auto theft costs Canadians billions of dollars each year. Our local Toronto Police Service cannot deal with this significant criminal industry without Provincial and Federal support.


[1] Insurance Bureau of Canada analysis based on industry data from General Insurance Statistical Agency (GISA) exhibit AUTO7001-ON-2020.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174235.pdf

Communications

(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Steve Koszylowsky (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Michael Lauber (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Greer Wright (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Jeffrey Stutz (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Marvyne Jenoff (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Laura Lamarche (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Shauna Corbin (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Brent McGaw (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Gail Axmith (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Harold B. Smith (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Stephen and Jill Kouri (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Patricia and William Clark (MM.Main)
(December 8, 2021) E-mail from Terry Lobo (MM.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Michael Ringel (MM.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Roz Hobson (MM.Main)
(December 9, 2021) E-mail from Naomi Miller (MM.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Murray Margolis (MM.Supp)
(December 11, 2021) E-mail from Annie Brelih and Wayne Robinson (MM.Supp)
(December 10, 2021) E-mail from Sheila Harrison (MM.Supp)
(December 13, 2021) Letter from France Rochette, Chair, Upper Avenue Community Association (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/comm/communicationfile-142593.pdf
(December 11, 2021) Letter from Jim Sadler, President, South Armour Heights Residents’ Association (SAHRA) (MM.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/comm/communicationfile-142597.pdf
(December 14, 2021) Letter from Maureen Kapral, Lytton Park Residents’ Association (MM.New)

MM38.26 - Request to Allow an Application to Amend the ConsumersNext Secondary Plan (as amended by Official Plan Amendment 393) - by Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council declare, pursuant to subsection 22(2.2) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13 for the purposes of subsection 22(2.1.1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, that Hiltin Hills Development Incorporated may be permitted to apply to amend the ConsumersNext Secondary Plan (as amended by Official Plan Amendment 393) including, in particular, Map 38-4: Potential Tall Building Locations and Maximum Densities, Policy 5.3 relating to minimum setback requirements and related policies, for the lands municipally known as 2135 Sheppard Ave East, 325 Yorkland Boulevard, 55 Smooth Rose Court and 15 Smooth Rose Court (Registered Plan 66M-2561, the "Lands") before the second anniversary of the first day on which any part of Official Plan Amendment 393 comes into effect for the purposes of seeking approval of a mid-rise mixed use building on Part of Block 1, Registered Plan 66M-2561 and more particularly described as Parts 4 and 10 on Reference Plan 66R-31677 (the “Site"), resulting in a density of 3.5 Floor Space Index (FSI) for the Site, and exceeding the overall maximum density currently permitted by Official Plan 393 for the Lands, that provides:

 

a.  a minimum of 1,858 square metres (20,000 square feet) of contiguous retail space provided on the ground floor of Building C on the Site, with the design of the space which shall not preclude the ability to accommodate a grocery store;

 
b.  a minimum of 1,197.5 square metres (12,889 square feet) of non-residential space provided on the second floor of Building C on the Site;

 
c.  the proposed parkland dedication for the development of Building C on the Site shall be relocated on the southern end of the site and integrated with the existing parkland block dedicated as part of the larger development (Block 2, Registered Plan 66M-2561, registered February 13, 2020 as Instrument  AT5363954); and

 
d.  the height of the proposed Building C, on the Site shall be no greater than the right-of-way width of Sheppard Avenue East, and shall meet the guidelines found in the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards.

 
2.  City Council declare that Part 1 above shall not be construed to fetter City Council's discretion with respect to its decision regarding any development application related to 2135 Sheppard Avenue East, 325 Yorkland Boulevard, 55 Smooth Rose Court and 15 Smooth Rose Court.

Summary

The approved site specific Zoning By-law 1182-2016 for the lands municipally known as 2135 Sheppard Avenue East, 325 Yorkland Boulevard, 55 Smooth Rose Court and 15 Smooth Rose Court permits a mixed use development in three residential buildings on the development site (Registered Plan 66M-2561, the "Lands") with heights of 34 storeys (Building A), 43 storeys (Building B), and 26 storeys (Building D), as well as a 4-storey retail building (Building C) at the southwest corner of Sheppard Avenue East and Yorkland Boulevard (Part of Block 1, Registered Plan 66M-2561 and more particularly described as Parts 4 and 10 on Reference Plan 66R-31677, the "Site").

 

Currently, Building D is constructed and occupied, and Building B is under construction and Site Plan Notice of Approval Conditions have been issued along with a Site Plan Agreement registered as Instrument AT5895305. Building A has a Site Plan Application filed with the City and is currently under review.

 

On August 10, 2021, Hiltin Hills Developments Inc. (the "Owner") submitted an Application to amend Zoning By-law 1182-2016 (the "Application"). The Application seeks to amend the 4-storey retail building (Building C) to permit a 12-storey mixed use building with an additional approximately 19,373.1 square metres of gross floor area on the Site, totalling 23,993.4 square metres.

 

The Application remains incomplete as of November 5, 2021. The Application, in its current form, does not conform to the ConsumersNext Secondary Plan with respect to the overall permitted density, building typology, setback, step backs, angular plane, and ground-floor uses.

 

Further, pursuant to Section 22 (2.1.1) of the Planning Act, the Owner is not permitted to file for an amendment to the Secondary Plan before the second anniversary of the first day any part of the Secondary Plan comes into effect. The ConsumersNext Secondary Plan came into force over the lands on April 16, 2021.  However, pursuant to the exception under Section 22 (2.2), Council may declare by resolution that a specific request to amend the Secondary Plan be permitted.

 

The Owner has agreed to amend the Application to lower the height of their proposal so that it meets the maximum height of the right-of-way of Sheppard Avenue East to be considered a mid-rise building as per the Mid-Rise Building Performance Standards, and to incorporate more retail space into their ground floor, as shown in the attached letter from the Owner. In particular, a minimum of 1,858 square metres (20,000 square feet) of contiguous retail space on the ground floor, the design of which shall not preclude the ability to accommodate a grocery store.

 

Further, the applicant has agreed to relocate the proposed parkland dedication to the southern end of the site to be integrated with the existing parkland block dedicated as part of the larger development site.  Additionally, the applicant has agreed to work with staff to resolve issues related to setbacks, step backs and angular planes. With the revisions to the proposal, the Application requires an amendment to the Official Plan (ConsumersNext Secondary Plan) to allow for a maximum density of 3.5 Floor Space Index (FSI) on the Site, which will exceed 3.5 Floor Space Index (FSI) for the Lands as currently permitted by the Secondary Plan, and recognize the existing 6.5 metre road widening previously conveyed along Sheppard Avenue East.  ("Requested OP Amendment").

 

In order to facilitate appropriate development on the Site while maintaining the intent of the original proposal to provide non-residential uses on the Lands, the owner requires City Council permit the request to amend the Secondary Plan for the City to accept and review the Requested Official Plan Amendment.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174236.pdf
Attachment 1 - Letter from Tribute Communities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174237.pdf

Communications

(December 15, 2021) E-mail from Susan Wakutz, Pleasant View Community Association (MM.New)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/comm/communicationfile-142825.pdf

MM38.27 - Reallocation of Section 37 Funds from 2450 Victoria Park Avenue for the Expansion of Pleasant View Library - by Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Don Valley North
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Housing Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Shelley Carroll, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend its decision on Item CC23.2, headed "2450 Victoria Park Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions", by:

 

a. amending Part 7.a. to read as follows:

 

"7.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a.  the community benefits offered in the Settlement Offer and recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i. a cash contribution of two million five hundred thousand ($2,500,000.00) dollars to be paid by the owner prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for any building on the Property and to be used towards public art, streetscape improvements, affordable housing and/or multi-purpose community agency space at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

ii. a cash contribution of five hundred thousand ($500,000.00) dollars to be paid by the owner prior to the issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions to the Site Plan Control Application and to be used towards Pleasant View Library at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

iii. the cash contributions referred to in Part 7.a.i. and 7.a.ii. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Residential or Non-Residential, as the case may be, Building Construction Price Index for the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Building Construction Price Indexes Publication No. 327-0058, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Agreement to the date of payment;

 

iv. in the event the cash contributions referred to in Part 7.a.i. and 7.a.ii. above has not been used for the determined purpose within three years of the amending Zoning By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided the purpose is identified in Official Plan Policy 5.1.1 and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands; and

 

v. the provision of a non-profit licensed 62 space child care centre to be located within the Property, on the ground floor of Building "D" with the precise location, capacity and related matters to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Children Services, and such child care centre shall generally be in accordance with the following:

 

A.  shall be of a resulting gross floor area of approximately 929 square metres with an accompanying outdoor play area of 279 square metres and be constructed, finished, furnished and equipped by the owner;

 

B.  shall be designed to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Children’s Services;

 

C.  will accommodate children of all ages, including infants, toddlers and preschoolers, generally in accordance with the City of Toronto's Child Care Development Guidelines;

 

D.  the minimum capacity and size of the Child Care Facility may be reduced at the sole discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the General Manager, Children’s Services; and

 

E.  the details of the lease term and other matters as described in this City Council decision, such as phasing, timing, location, obligations and any such matters to implement the Child Care Centre, in respect of the non-profit licensed child care centre community benefit will be finalized between the owner and the City and will be substantially in accordance with the City of Toronto's Child Care Development Guidelines (2016), including a provision of one hundred and eighty thousand ($180,000.00) dollars for start-up operating costs and equipment costs and one hundred and fifty thousand ($150,000.00) dollars for a replacement reserve fund; and

 

b. amending Part 7.b.iv.to read as follows:

 

"iv. the minimum of 6,203 square metres of non-residential gross floor area, representing a minimum of 80 percent of the existing non-residential gross floor area on the Property, with the non-residential gross floor area to be provided to prior to or concurrent with the provision of residential gross floor area for the Property; for greater clarity, the implementing Zoning By-law would allow the childcare in Part 7.a.v. above, to form part of the replacement non-residential gross floor area;".

Summary

On October 30, 2017, the applicant submitted a Zoning By-law Amendment Application for the lands municipally known as 2450 Victoria Park Avenue. The Zoning By-law Amendment Application proposed to redevelop the lands with a total of four mixed use buildings ranging in height from 11 to 44 storeys. A new 2,915 square metre onsite public park and two new east-west private roads were also proposed as part of the application. The existing seven-storey (7,755 square metres) office building on the lands was also proposed to be demolished.

 

On March 23, 2018, the applicant appealed their proposal to the Local Planning Appeal

Tribunal due to Council's failure to make a decision within the statutory timeframe.

 

Over the course of two years, settlement discussions between the applicant and respective Parties took place resulting in a consensus on built form, density, parking ratio, and site organization. A settlement was reached between the City, Owners and Armenian Community Centre. On August 27, 2020, a virtual settlement hearing took place with the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal. The revised submission now proposes four mixed use buildings ranging in height from 11 to 28 storeys. The current plans also include a 2,850 square metre onsite public park, as well as a new public east-west road. The Local Planning Appeal Tribunal decision was issued on November 25, 2020 and included several pre-conditions to be fulfilled prior to the issuance of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal's final order. The applicant is currently working on fulfilling these pre-conditions, and have also submitted associated Site Plan Control and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications.

 

City Council authorized the City Solicitor to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, which would accept and secure community benefits as part of the settlement offer. One of the community benefits include a cash contribution of three million ($3,000,000.00) dollars to be used towards public art, streetscape improvements, affordable housing and/or multi-purpose community agency space.

 

The purpose of this Motion is for City Council to reallocate five hundred thousand ($500,000) dollars of the three million ($3,000,000) dollars originally to be used towards public art, streetscape improvements, affordable housing and/or multi-purpose community agency space, to go towards upgrades and expansion of Pleasant View Library.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM38.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174242.pdf

MM38.28 - Policy to Require Members of Council and Public Appointees to Provide Proof of Vaccination to attend Legislative Meetings in person - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor John Filion

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:

 

1. City Council require that any Member of Council who wishes to attend in person any City Council meeting, Committee meeting, tribunal meeting, or meeting of an City Agency, Board, or Corporation must provide proof of being fully vaccinated to the City Clerk prior to the meeting and that Members failing to do so will be required to participate remotely.

 

2. City Council require that, where the City Clerk, Court Services or any other City staff provides support to a tribunal, Agency, Board, Corporation or Council Advisory Body, any Public member who sits on these bodies and who wishes to attend a meeting in person, must provide proof of being fully vaccinated to the City Clerk or to the Tribunal or Board Secretary, as the case may be, prior to the meeting and that Public appointees who fail to do so will be required to participate remotely.

 

3. City Council request and authorize any Agencies, Boards, and Corporations that are separately governed to adopt this Policy by appropriate means, including through an amendment to applicable procedural by-laws or rules.

Summary

The health and safety of City employees is a priority. The City of Toronto is committed to taking every precaution reasonable in the circumstances for the protection of the health and safety of workers from the hazard of COVID-19. Vaccination is a key element in the protection of City employees against the hazard of COVID-19.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM38.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174296.pdf

MM38.29 - Youth Employment Partnership with Desjardins - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the Staff Recommended 2022 Operating Budget for Social Development, Finance and Administration, subsequent to its approval, by $300,000 gross and $0 net, and City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to enter into contact with Desjardins to receive the funds and allocate and re-allocate or approve and disburse funding to relevant City Agencies and Boards and contracted community service agencies for the Youth Skills Development Pilot to enhance existing youth jobs, workforce development pathways, and training initiatives and financial literacy initiatives, in collaboration with Desjardins.

Summary

Desjardins has been serving Canadians for over 120 years. The husband-and-wife team of Alphonse and Dorimene Desjardins introduced the credit union movement to North America. Their mission was to improve the economic and social well-being of people and their communities by working together. By following this mission and staying close to the communities it serves, Desjardins has evolved to become Canada's leading cooperative financial group providing financial services to over 7 million members and clients. Today, over 4,000 associates represent the Desjardins brand here in Ontario with plans to continue to grow.

 

Desjardins has committed to investing $250 million by 2024 in projects across Canada that support community priorities, including youth, sustainable development, and entrepreneurship.  Desjardins values align clearly with the City of Toronto's and many existing Council-directed strategies, including TO Prosperity: Toronto's Poverty Reduction Strategy and the Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism.

 

Desjardins is partnering with the City to provide a onetime $300,000 contribution to support Toronto young people, particularly Black, Indigenous and racialized youth through youth jobs, workforce development pathways, training and financial literacy initiatives.

 

Preliminary investments include a Youth Skills Development Pilot Program in Little Jamaica at $100,000 per year for a two-year commitment focused on employment in the financial services industries and building strength in financial literacy. Desjardins will also invest $100,000 to enhance existing workforce development and entrepreneurship pathways and training initiatives including Toronto Community Housing’s YouthWorx and Be.Build.Brand Programs and the City’s ArtworksTO Program.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174444.pdf

MM38.30 - Metrolinx Memorandum of Understanding for Dog Off-Leash Area on the Weston Tunnel Roof - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, Transit Expansion Office to request Metrolinx to expedite efforts to deliver on its commitments made to the local community to create a Dog Off-Leash Area on the Weston Tunnel Roof.

Summary

In 2015, Metrolinx and the City of Toronto executed a Memorandum of Understanding that established a commitment to deliver a Dog Off-Leash Area and future park area over those portions of the Weston Tunnel Roof that are not being used by the Toronto Catholic District School Board. This is a long-awaited improvement, and the community has communicated the increased need for such space in this area.

 

City staff have been engaging with Metrolinx's Third Party Review team with the aim of securing a permit from Metrolinx staff to proceed with outstanding construction works to deliver the Dog Off-Leash Area. These efforts have been challenged by a lack of timely sharing of information regarding site restrictions and newly identified technical issues.

 

Metrolinx is requested to make all efforts to prioritize and expedite this project to ensure the City and Metrolinx can deliver this much-needed park space for the community.

 

This Motion is urgent in order to complete the Memorandum of Understanding for this much-needed park space by January.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174440.pdf

MM38.31 - Authorization to Enter into Agreement with Toronto Botanical Garden for Transfer of Civic Garden Foundation Endowment Funds - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Infrastructure and Environment Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor James Pasternak recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to accept approximately $175,000 as the City's share of the disposition of the Civic Garden Foundation's property upon dissolution of the Foundation per the Foundation's Letters Patent.

 
2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and execute an agreement with the Toronto Botanical Garden to transfer the City's share of the funds received from the Civic Garden Foundation, requiring Toronto Botanical Garden to spend the funds on parks and horticultural purposes, with the agreement in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 
3. City Council authorize the transfer of the funds referenced in the agreement between the City and Toronto Botanical Garden in Recommendation 2 above, once the agreement has been signed.

Summary

The Civic Garden Foundation was established in 1983 as a fundraising vehicle and holder of endowment funds for the Civic Garden Centre, the precursor to today's Toronto Botanical Garden.

 

The only function today of the Civic Garden Foundation is to hold endowment funds and distribute the proceeds to Toronto Botanical Garden, a registered charity. The board of the Civic Garden Foundation has determined that the costs and Canada Revenue Agency reporting obligations required to maintain the Foundation are no longer worth having the Foundation remain a separate entity from Toronto Botanical Garden, when Toronto Botanical Garden as a registered charity can perform the same function. Therefore, the Foundation's board has decided to dissolve the Foundation.

 

The Foundation's Letter's Patent require that, upon dissolution and after payment of all debts and liabilities, its remaining property shall be "disposed of to the Municipality of Metropolitan Toronto for application for parks and horticultural purposes and The Civic Garden Centre [now Toronto Botanical Garden] equally or failing them to any Canadian charitable organization or governmental body."

 

Toronto Botanical Garden has requested, and the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation agrees, that the City's share of the Foundation's remaining property, estimated at approximately $175,000, be transferred to Toronto Botanical Garden for the same purposes the Foundation was originally mandated to fulfill.

 

This motion seeks Council authority to accept the funds from the Civic Garden Foundation and enter into the appropriate agreement with Toronto Botanical Garden and transfer the funds to Toronto Botanical Garden.

 

The motion is urgent as the Civic Garden Foundation wishes to wind up operations before the end of fiscal 2021.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174443.pdf

MM38.32 - 1200 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - Davenport
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that City Council adopt the following recommendation in the report (December 10, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to support the built form changes and increase in Gross Floor Area set out in this Report and as shown on the Revised Plans before the Ontario Land Tribunal ("OLT) on the matter of 1200 Dundas Street West (PL171337).

Summary

Dundas Ossington Developments Limited (the "Applicant") is the owner of the property municipally known as 1200 Dundas Street West (the "Subject Property"). In 2017, the Applicant applied for a Zoning By-law Amendment in order to facilitate a proposed redevelopment of the Subject Property to construct an eight-storey mixed use building (the "Application").  The Applicant appealed the Application to the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal due to City Council's failure to make a decision. The Applicant submitted a without prejudice settlement offer dated May 6, 2019 (the "Settlement Offer"), which was endorsed by City Council through its adoption of Item CC7.11 at its meeting held on May 14 and 15, 2019. On June 24, 2019, the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal issued an Order, approving the revised Application in principle, generally in accordance with the Settlement Offer dated May 6, 2019 and corresponding revised plans, but withheld the final Order subject to conditions, which include but are not limited to that a number of site plan matters are resolved to the satisfaction of Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor, and that the Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the Zoning By-law Amendment is in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor.

 

Through the Site Plan Control process, modifications were made to the built form and design of the proposal, which satisfied City Staff, but that resulted in approximately 312 square metres of additional residential Gross Floor Area and 100 square metres less of non-residential Gross Floor Area than what was supported by Council through the adoption of Item CC7.11.

 

The Request for Directions Report from the Chief Planner recommends that City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to support the built form changes and increase in Gross Floor Area set out in the report (December 10, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and as shown on the Revised Plans attached to the report (December 10, 2021) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the matter of 1200 Dundas Street West (PL171337) before the Ontario Land Tribunal.

 

This Motion is urgent due to the need to advance the application.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174448.pdf
(December 10, 2021) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 1200 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Directions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174449.pdf
Attachment 1 - Architectural Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174451.pdf

MM38.33 - Appointment of Public Members to the CreateTO Board of Directors - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Corporations Nominating Panel. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Urgent - This Motion is urgent as there is the need to fill positions on the Board expeditiously.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council appoint the following persons to the CreateTO Board of Directors, and the Boards of Build Toronto and the Toronto Port Lands Company, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office starting January 1, 2022 and ending June 30, 2023, and until successors are appointed:

 

a. Ron Carinci, as Chair; and

 

b. Marcie Zajdeman.

Summary

CreateTO has been extensively involved in the City's housing programs including Housing Now as well as managing City land across Toronto.  With the recent appointment of a new Chief Executive Officer, and with many continuing and forthcoming initiatives involving CreateTO across the City, it is crucial that the agency have stability with respect to its Board of Directors.  Those serving on the Board of Directors require institutional knowledge, expertise and experience as CreateTO meets the many challenges and opportunities that characterize its operations and initiatives at this critical time.  It is in this context that the appointment of a Chair and a Director requires urgent approval to ensure the continuity and stability of CreateTO.

 

This Motion is urgent as there is the need to fill positions on the Board expeditiously.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.33
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174442.pdf

MM38.34 - Amending Definition for Small Business Property Tax Subclass to Clarify Eligibility - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item EX27.7. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Bill 1042 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Brad Bradford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 767, Taxation, Property Tax, Article 12, Small Business Subclass, to amend the eligibility criteria to more clearly define the geographic areas that determine whether a property is eligible to be included in the Small Business subclass based on square footage, by deleting the wording in Section 767-12.3A (2)(a):

 

a. The Eligible Property is located within the geographic areas identified in the City of Toronto Official Plan as Downtown and Central Waterfront, Avenues or Centres; and

 

And replacing it with:

 

a. The Eligible Property is located within the geographic areas identified as Downtown and Central Waterfront, Avenues or Centres on the map titled: Designated Areas for the City of Toronto Small Business Subclass attached as Appendix 1 to this Chapter; and

 

2. City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary Bills in Council to give effect to City Council's decision.

Summary

City Council adopted Item EX27.7: Implementing a Small Business Property Tax Subclass

at its meeting of November 9, 10 and 12, 2021. Attachment 1 to the Item identifies the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the subclass, and the criteria were subsequently enacted by By-law 924-2021.

 

The eligibility criteria identifies certain geographic areas that are used to determine eligibility.  To provide greater clarity of the geographic areas eligible for inclusion, a specialized map has been created to reflect the boundaries of the designated areas.  This scalable map will show the actual parcel boundaries and provide a much more accurate representation of eligible areas. The map layer will be made available to the public, and will reflect the list of properties eligible for inclusion in the small business subclass.

 

This Motion seeks Council approval to amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 767, Taxation, Property Tax, Article 12, Small Business Subclass § 767-12.3 to replace the Official Plan reference to refer instead to this new map titled:  Designated Areas for the City of Toronto Small Business Subclass.

 

This Motion is deemed urgent in order to allow sufficient time to identify properties eligible to be included in the small business property tax subclass, in order that the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation can change the tax classification of eligible properties in time that allows the Final 2022 Property Tax bills to reflect the reduced tax rate for small business properties.

 

REQUIRES RE-OPENING

 

Executive Committee Item EX27.7 (November 9, 10 and 12, 2021) City Council meeting) only as it pertains to the identification of geographic areas used to determine eligibility.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.34
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174441.pdf

MM38.35 - Authority to amend the Section 37 Agreement for 844 Don Mills Road, 1150 and 1155 Eglinton Avenue East to exempt CMHC, CMHC approved lenders and subsequent transferees from certain Section 37 Obligations - by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Don Valley East
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that: 

 

1. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to enter into and register on title an agreement to amend the Section 37 Agreement dated December 20, 2018, registered as Instrument No. AT5050933, as amended by agreement dated July 5, 2021 and registered as Instrument No. AT5787415, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, as follows:


a. add the following definitions to the Section 37 Agreement:

 

“Approved Lender” means a lender designated as an approved lender by CMHC in accordance with the National Housing Act (Canada) and the regulations thereunder that is a mortgagee of the Affordable Rental Housing Units to be provided on Block 5A pursuant to a certificate of insurance issued by CMHC.

 

“CMHC” means Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation established by the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-7, as amended; and

 

b. add the following paragraph, following section 14.2:

 

"Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, CMHC, an Approved Lender, any transferee from CMHC or an Approved Lender, or any subsequent successors in title to Block 5A will only be responsible for obligations specifically pertaining to Block 5A, and will not otherwise be bound as Owner under this Agreement, where any of such persons becomes the Affordable Rental Housing Owner.  For clarity, for the purpose of this paragraph, subsequent successors in title to Block 5A only pertains to Affordable Rental Housing Owners that follow CMHC, an Approved Lender or their transferees on title." 

 

2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to prepare such amendments to the registered Section 37 Agreement and any other such amendments determined necessary to implement City Council's decision on this matter, on terms satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Summary

On December 20, 2018, the City entered into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, registered as Instrument No. AT5050933 on January 10, 2019, to secure the provision of certain facilities, services and matters in return for increases in the height and density of development on the Site. This agreement was amended on July 5, 2021, which amending agreement was registered as Instrument No. AT 5787415.

 

The current owner intends to convey Block 5A to a not-for-profit housing provider for the construction, provision and operation of an affordable rental housing building. It is possible that the Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation or an approved lender designated by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation in accordance with the National Housing Act (Canada) will finance the development of Block 5A. Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation has requested that in the event that it, or an approved lender, becomes owner of Block 5A that they, their transferees and thereafter subsequent transferees, be exempt from the Section 37 obligations other than those directly pertaining to Block 5A and the construction, provision and operation of the affordable rental housing within that Block.  An amendment to the Section 37 Agreement is required to facilitate this request.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.35
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174445.pdf

MM38.36 - 210 Maple Leaf Drive - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - York South - Weston
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailao, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, with appropriate City staff, in order to oppose the consent and minor variances granted by the Committee of Adjustment with the respect to the proposed development at 210 Maple Leaf Drive (Applications B0014/21EYK, A0059/21EYK, A0060/21EYK);

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside consultants as necessary.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a resolution of the appeal and, if a resolution is reached, to settle the appeal at the City Solicitor's discretion, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment seeking consent to sever the property located at 210 Maple Leaf Drive into two undersized residential lots and to construct a new dwelling on each severed lot. The applicant also sought three (3) variances from the minimum lot area, minimum lot frontage and side yard setback requirements under Zoning By-law 569-2013 (B0014/21EYK, A0059/21EYK, A0060/21EYK) ("the Application").

 

Planning staff do not support the consent. Forestry staff also recommended the Application be refused.  

 

The Committee of Adjustment approved the consent and requested variances in its decision of November 30, 2021 (the "Decision"). The Decision has not been appealed to the Toronto Local Appeal Body by the applicant.

 

This Motion will direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision and attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body, along with appropriate staff, in order to oppose the Application.

 

This Motion is urgent because the last date of appeal is Monday, December 20, 2021, and before the February session of Council.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.36
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174446.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission/Consent for 210 Maple Leaf Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174447.pdf

MM38.37 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Revitalization of Massey Hall - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Mayor John Tory

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Mayor John Tory recommends that:

 

 1. City Council direct that, in accordance with the Section 37 Agreement for 480-492 Yonge Street and 3 Grosvenor Street, which specifies a community benefit of $1,370,805 to be allocated towards community, cultural or recreational facilities capital improvements within Ward 13, indexed upward annually for inflation, $437,048.69 of this funding shall be provided for the Massey Hall Revitalization.
 

2.  City Council direct that, in accordance with the Section 37 Agreement for 219-231 Dundas Street East, which specifies a community benefit of $527,318.79 to be allocated towards community, cultural or recreational facilities capital improvements within Ward 13, indexed upward annually for inflation, $350,335 of this funding shall be provided for the Massey Hall Revitalization. 
  

3.  City Council direct that, in accordance with the Section 37 Agreement for 60 Shuter Street and 187 and 189 Church Street, which specifies a community benefit of $212,616.31 to be allocated towards community, cultural or recreational facilities capital improvements within Ward 13, indexed upward annually for inflation, $212,616.31 of this funding shall be provided for the Massey Hall Revitalization.
 

4.  City Council request the Federal and Provincial governments to expand their support to ensure that Massey Hall receives the necessary financial support and assistance to complete the project in a timely manner.

Summary

Massey Hall is an iconic pillar of Toronto's cultural scene. The performing arts theater has brought Torontonians renowned artists and musicians from Canada and across the globe since 1894. As a legendary tourist attraction in Toronto's downtown core, Massey Hall welcomes people from all over the world. 

 

In July 2018, Massey Hall began a significant renovation. The revitalization includes a full restoration of the exterior and interior of the building- including the restoration of 100 original stained-glass windows. The new addition of a seven-storey tower will feature a live-music stage and performance studio in addition to accessibility features. The revitalization beautifully preserves the history of the venue while simultaneously strengthening its role as a vital music hub, able to showcase established artists and support the development of emerging artists, with the creation of a new 500-person performance space. 

 

While some work on the revitalization remains, Massey Hall officially reopened to the public in November 2021 after a three year closure. The entire project costs $184 million as is funded through a combination of corporate sponsorships, Provincial and Federal contributions and philanthropic sources. A small funding gap exists for the organization, making this investment timely and important. As a major cultural attraction in the downtown and for the city, there is no doubt that  Massey Hall will contribute to the City’s economic growth and recovery especially as the tourism industry opens up and we seek to welcome visitors back to our city following the significant tourism impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.37
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174469.pdf

MM38.38 - 399 Keele Street - Liquor Licence Application - Taste Seduction Food Services License Number 712439 - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Parkdale - High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the issuance of a liquor licence for Taste Seduction Food Services, 399 Keele Street is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents and that the Registrar should issue either a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.

 
2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 
3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and City Council direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including determining whether the application ought to be refused outright or whether the application can be supported with conditions to the liquor licence, all in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

An application has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a liquor licence at the premises at 399 Keele Street to operate under Taste Seduction Food Services (“Premises”). The application is for an indoor and outdoor area.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns with respect to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the concerns of the residents are addressed. The Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review or a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application. 

 

This matter is considered urgent as the deadline for objections is December 28, 2021. The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.38
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174479.pdf

MM38.39 - Conveyance of Parkland - 100 Broadway Avenue and 223-233 Redpath Avenue, and 110-120 Broadway Avenue - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council require the owners of the lands at 100 Broadway Avenue and 223 – 233 Redpath Avenue, and 110 – 120 Broadway Avenue, to enter into and register, in priority, against title to their respective lands an Amended Section 37 Agreement, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor, in accordance with the following terms:

 

a.  prior to the issuance of the any above grade building permit(s), including any conditional above-grade building permits, the Owners shall:

 

i.  post Financial Security in the amount of the value of the parkland as appraised by the Executive Director, Corporate and Real Estate Management in the form of a Letter of Credit and such security shall not be released until the parkland is conveyed to the City in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the Financial Security shall be paid in a form satisfactory to the City, and from the date the Financial Security is first paid to the City to such time as the parkland is conveyed to the City, be indexed annually in accordance with the appropriate Statistics Canada index to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; and

 

ii.  register in priority a Section 118 Restriction, pursuant to the Land Titles Act against title to the parkland to be conveyed to the City, that prohibits the transfer or charge of the parkland without the prior written consent of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, concurrent with the registration of the Amending Section 37 Agreement on title to 100 Broadway Avenue and 223 – 233 Redpath Avenue, and 110 – 120 Broadway Avenue; and

 

b.  no later than six (6) months after the issuance of the first Above-Grade Building Permit, including any conditional above-grade building permits, for 100 Broadway Avenue and 223 – 233 Redpath Avenue, and 110 – 120 Broadway Avenue, whichever is first:

 

i.  the 100 Broadway Avenue and 223 – 233 Redpath owners shall convey to the City a minimum 92.3 square metres of the lands for public parkland purposes, to the satisfaction of General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act; this conveyance and the conveyance of 148 square metres of parkland at 174 – 180 Broadway Avenue, which has already been conveyed to the City, shall satisfy the Owners’ Statutory Parkland Dedication requirement;

 

ii.  the 110 – 120 Broadway Avenue owners shall convey to the City a minimum 567.6 square metres of the lands for public parkland purposes, to the satisfaction of General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act, which shall satisfy the Owners’ Statutory Parkland Dedication requirement;

 

iii.  the 110 – 120 Broadway Avenue owners shall convey an additional 86.1 square metres of the lands for public parkland purposes, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act; where the conveyances of Parts 1.b.i., ii, and iii above, combined together form a minimum of 894 square metres of land for public parkland purposes;

 

iv.  the 100 Broadway Avenue and 223 – 233 Redpath owners and the 110 – 120 Broadway Avenue owners shall complete the conveyances referred to above to be free and clear above-grade and below-grade of all physical obstructions and easements, encumbrances and encroachments, including surface and subsurface easements, to the satisfaction of General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor;

 

v.  the 100 Broadway Avenue and 223 – 233 Redpath owners and the 110 – 120 Broadway Avenue owners shall complete the environmental obligations as outlined in the Section 37 Agreement registered on title; and

 

vi.  in no event shall there be any residential occupancy or registration of any condominium on any part of the lands under the Condominium Act until such a time as the all of parkland identified above is conveyed to the City.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to prepare such amendments to the registered Section 37 Agreement and any other such amendments determined necessary to implement City Council's decision on this matter to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the City Solicitor.

Summary

100 Broadway Avenue is a purpose-built rental building that includes over 300 replacement units for the site itself, and for those units that City Council has permitted to be demolished at 117-127 Broadway Avenue, 110 – 120 Broadway Avenue, and 174-180 Broadway Avenue. It also includes 50 new affordable units secured as part of the 110 – 120 Broadway re-zoning application. As presently approved and agreed to, the parkland dedication for the 100 Broadway site is required, prior to the Owner being issued an Above-Grade Building Permit for the 100 Broadway building, in accordance with the Municipal Code. The Owner is not yet ready to convey the parkland, because the environmental work to allow for the conveyance in accordance with City policy has been unexpectedly delayed; whereas the Owner is expected to be ready to request an Above Grade Building Permit for the 100 Broadway building in March, 2022 (before the environmental work is completed). A delay in being permitted to request an Above Grade Building Permit for the building at 100 Broadway will mean a delay in constructing and delivering the replacement and new affordable rental housing units, which will impact not only new tenants of the building looking for an affordable unit, but also tenants who have been displaced looking to return to a new unit in the new building. Further, if the issuance of an above grade permit is delayed, the conveyance of the park may also be delayed, as the requirement to complete the park is within 3 years after the issuance of an above grade permit. Amendments to the registered Section 37 Agreements for the 100 and 110-120 Broadway Avenue redevelopments are required, prior to the Owner being able to apply for the Above-Grade Building Permit for the 100 Broadway building. This motion is urgent because, if adopted at the December 15 and 16, 2021 City Council meeting, it will allow for Amending Section 37 Agreement(s) to be drafted and registered in time for the Owner to apply for an Above Grade Building Permit for the 100 Broadway building by March, 2022.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.39
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174467.pdf

MM38.40 - Separate Licence Extension Agreements between City of Toronto, as Licensor, and 2249487 Ontario Limited and Easy and The Fifth Inc., as Licensees, for certain premises located at 229 Richmond Street West - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Deputy Mayor Michael Thompson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Deputy Mayor Michael Thompson recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Director, Transaction Services, or their designate, from time to time, to enter into separate licence extension agreements with 2249487 Ontario Limited (operating as The Ballroom) and Fifth Social Club Inc. (assumed licence from Easy and the Fifth Inc.) (collectively, the "Licensees") on a nominal basis substantially on the terms and conditions in Appendix A of this Motion (the "Licence Extension Agreements"), and including such other terms as deemed appropriate by the Director, Transaction Services, or their designate, from time to time, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 
2.  City Council authorize the Director, Transaction Services to execute and deliver the Licence Extension Agreements and any amendments on behalf of the City.

 
3.  City Council authorize the Director, Transaction Services, or their designate, to administer and manage the Licence Extension Agreements and amendments, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers, notices and notices of termination, provided that the Director, Transaction Services, may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters to City Council for its determination and direction.

Summary

CaféTO is a significant pandemic response program initiated in Spring 2020 to support local Toronto businesses by accommodating rapid access to the public right-of-way for expanded outdoor dining, among other benefits. City Council authorized the renewal of the program with additional enhancements in January 2021. In alignment with the intent and principles of CaféTO, and to provide the most assistance possible to businesses that have been impacted by the hardships of the pandemic, the City of Toronto has made continuous efforts to provide restaurant owners with access to vacant/unused municipal property abutting restaurants that do not meet the CaféTO program criteria.

 

In summer of 2020, 2249487 Ontario Limited (operating as The Ballroom) and Easy and The Fifth Inc. (collectively, the "Licensees") requested to operate outdoor patios at 229 Richmond Street West (the "Property"), which is a City-owned vacant lot, because they were not qualified under the CaféTO program due to the restaurants abutting the Property. Consequently, the City granted separate licenses over a part of the Property (the "Licensed Area") to each of the Licensees to use for outdoor patio purposes for a term of two (2) weeks commencing July 17, 2021 and expiring July 31, 2021 at fair market value license fees. The Licensees' use of the Licensed Area was governed by guidelines similar to the CaféTO program. At its meeting on July 28 2020, City Council authorized the extension of the terms of the licenses until November 16, 2020 and waived the licence fees for the use of the Licensed Area, and additionally enacted a temporary use by-law (the "Site Specific By-law") permitting the use of Property as an outdoor patio. At its meeting of May 5, 2021, City Council authorized entering into new separate licence agreements with each of the Licensees commencing May 6, 2021 and expiring on January 2, 2022 on similar terms and conditions as provided for in the previous licence agreements.

 

The Licencees have now requested the use of the Licensed Area until January 2, 2023 on the same terms and conditions as provided for in the current licence agreement. Per adopted report PH21.7, the site-specific temporary use by-law has been extended by City Council to permit this use to April 14, 2022. Prior to its current expiration, City Planning will be requesting authority from City Council to extend the site-specific temporary use by-law past April 14, 2022.

 

This request is in line with the spirit of the CaféTO program and Council's previous decisions to support local eating establishments as they re-open following closures resulting from COVID-19. Therefore, the purpose of this motion is to obtain authority for the City to enter into separate licence extension agreements for nominal consideration with each of the Licensees for the Licensed Area for the purpose of a patio in connection with the Licensees' restaurants located immediately to the west and east of the Licenced Area.

 

Work is actively underway to transform 229 Richmond Street West into the first major new park in the rapidly-growing King-Spadina area in a generation. Parks, Forestry and Recreation will initiate public engagement on the new park design in 2022 and timelines for construction are not affected by the temporary extension of these licences.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.40
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174458.pdf
Appendices A and B to MM38.40
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174465.pdf

MM38.41 - Authorization to Submit Pandemic-Related Expenses to the Ontario Ministry of Health for Approved Reimbursement - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the pay-out of lieu-time balances, as of December 31, 2021, at straight time for Toronto Public Health non-union employees and for employees deployed to Toronto Public Health for the lieu-time balances earned while deployed to Toronto Public Health.

Summary

Toronto Public Health employees have gone above and beyond to keep Toronto safe throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and we will soon enter our third year of non-stop, around the clock work.
 
The Ministry of Health has approved a budget for Toronto Public Health that includes overtime as an extraordinary pandemic-related expense that is eligible for full reimbursement by the Province of Ontario. City Council's authorization is needed to pay out the lieu-time balance for hours worked in 2020 and 2021 by non-union Toronto Public Health employees in line with Ministry of Health budget.
 
This motion is urgent because City Council must provide authorization before the end of 2021 in order to be fully reimbursed by the Province.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.41
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174457.pdf

MM38.42 - 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way-Section 37 Agreement—Use of Non-Profit Space - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that: 

 

1. That City Council direct the appropriate City staff to work with the owner of 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way and The Childcare Research Hub so that the two parties can proceed with a lease negotiation for the non-profit community space located on first and second floors of the subject property.

 

2. City Council increase the Approved 2021 Operating Budget for Corporate Real Estate Management by $50,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained from the development at 156 Front Street West (Source Account: XR3026-3701065) for the purpose of providing one time capital funding to the Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care on behalf of The Childcare Research Hub for capital improvements to the non-profit space at 355 King Street West (Cost Centre NP2161).

 

3. City Council direct that the $50,000 be forwarded to Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care on behalf of The Childcare Research Hub, subject to Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care signing an Undertaking that governs the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

 

4. City Council request the Controller to report to the General Government and Licensing Committee on the feasibility and financial implications of designating the community space as a Municipal Capital Facility and exempting the community space from property taxes.

Summary

In 2010, the City entered into a Section 37 agreement with the owner of 355 King Street West and 119 Blue Jays Way to permit a large mixed use development. In addition to cash and other contributions, the section 37 agreement requires the owner to provide 900 square metres of non-profit use space, to be used for non-profit arts, cultural or institutional uses. The space has now been constructed on the ground floor and second floor of the building. The owner is required to lease this space to non-profit users for a term of 25 years, with an option to extend the lease for three further terms of 25 years each, for a total potential term of 100 years. The agreement provides for a triple net lease, with the tenant responsible for all operating costs in connection with the occupancy of the non-profit space. Under the Section 37 agreement it is the owner who selects the tenant of the space and enters into a lease directly with the successful tenant.

 

A suitable tenant has been identified for this non-profit space: The Childcare Research Hub, which will act as a hub for multiple childcare research and advocacy non-profit organizations. The Childcare Research hub are currently incorporating a new umbrella organization, and its constituent members will be the Childcare Resource and Research Unit, Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care, the Association of Early Childhood Educators Ontario and the Toronto Community for Better Child Care.

 

I have discussed this tenant with the owner of the property, who is satisfied that this will be an appropriate tenant for the space. Accordingly, I am requesting that City Council direct the appropriate City staff to work with the owner of the property and the proposed tenant so that the two parties can proceed with a lease negotiation for the community space.

 

This motion is urgent due to a clause in the Section 37 agreement allowing the owner to make a cash payment to the City instead of providing the community space. It is necessary that an appropriate tenant be secured quickly.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.42
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174461.pdf

MM38.43 - Reaffirming Toronto's Opposition and Providing Financial Support to the Legal Challenge against Quebec's Bill 21 - by Mayor John Tory, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ana Bailão, Councillor Shelley Carroll, Councillor Mike Layton, Councillor James Pasternak, Deputy Mayor Michael Thompson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Mayor John Tory, seconded by Deputy Mayor Ana Bailão, Councillor Shelley Carroll, Councillor Mike Layton, Councillor James Pasternak, Deputy Mayor Michael Thompson recommends that:

 

1. City Council reaffirm its opposition to the Province of Quebec's Bill 21, An Act respecting the laicity of the State ("Bill 21") and reaffirm the City's commitment to upholding the freedoms set out in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

 

2. City Council support the current legal challenge against Bill 21.

 

3. City Council provide a one-time 2021 contribution of up to $100,000 to the joint legal challenges of Bill 21 by the National Council of Canadian Muslims, the World Sikh Organization, and the Canadian Civil Liberties Association, to be accommodated from available funding within the 2021 Operating Budget within Non-Program Expenditures.

 

4. City Council call on all other Canadian municipalities to affirm their opposition to Bill 21 and provide financial contributions to support the legal challenge.

Summary

Last week, Fatemeh Anvari was removed from her job as a Grade 3 teacher at Chelsea Elementary School in Quebec for wearing a hijab. Under Quebec's Bill 21, frontline public employees are banned from displaying religious symbols while working and can be removed or fired as a result. 

 

Toronto City Council has taken a consistent and firm stance in opposition to Bill 21. Toronto, as one of the most diverse and multicultural cities on the planet, is home to many different religious communities, and ensures that people of all faiths can feel comfortable wearing their religious symbols in schools, workplaces, and government institutions. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms provides that everyone has the fundamental freedom of conscience and religion.

 

In 2019, Council unanimously approved a motion in response to Bill 21 when it was first proposed in the Quebec National Assembly. The Motion stated:

 

City Council once again reaffirm its support for freedom of religion and expression, and, further state its opposition to any legislation that would restrict or prohibit such freedoms and by doing so, Toronto states its position that the City continues to be a source of worldwide inspiration.

 

Later that year, after Bill 21 was approved, Council again voiced its opposition, stating:

 

1. City Council oppose Quebec's Bill 21, An Act respecting the laicity of the State and reaffirm the City's commitment to upholding religious freedoms as outlined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

 

2. City Council endorse the initiative proposed by Calgary City Council and supported by the Regional Municipality of Peel that asks the Canadian Coalition of Municipalities Against Racism and Discrimination, of which the City of Toronto is a member, to create a nationwide campaign that highlights the harmful widespread impacts of Bill 21 on social cohesion and inclusion in Canada.

 

3. City Council encourage the Federal Government to unequivocally condemn and challenge Quebec's Bill 21.

 

This law diminishes rights protected by The Canadian Charter of Rights of Freedoms and stands contrary to the values of Torontonians and Canadians—values this council has been vigilant in protecting and upholding.

 

Yesterday, Brampton City Council committed financial support to the legal challenge against Bill 21, and asked that other Canadian municipalities similarly provide financial contributions towards the legal challenge.

 
This Motion is urgent because, in order to provide the best fighting chance for the legal challenge to Bill 21, it requires a commitment of sufficient financial resources from Canadian municipalities as soon as possible.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.43
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174505.pdf

MM38.44 - 42 Cedarview Drive - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Toronto Local Appeal Body - by Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Scarborough - Rouge Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Jennifer McKelvie, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to seek to retain outside consultants in order to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the minor variance Application Number A0326/21SC regarding 42 Cedarview Drive.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City in the City Solicitor's discretion.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment seeking permission to construct a new two-storey detached dwelling with an integral two car garage, a rear covered deck, a rear yard pool and poolhouse at 42 Cedarview Drive (Application Number A0326/21SC).
 
In particular, the applicant seeks variances from City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013, including variances for building length, building depth and height of rear platform beyond 2.5 metres from the rear main wall.
 
On November 17, 2021, the Scarborough District Panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused to grant the requested variances (Decision attached). The applicant has appealed the refusal to the Toronto Local Appeal Body. A hearing of this appeal has not been scheduled at this time.
 
This Motion will authorize the City Solicitor to seek to retain outside consultants in order to attend the Toronto Local Appeal Body to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the minor variance application. This Motion will also authorize the City Solicitor to resolve the matter on behalf of the City in the City Solicitor's discretion.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.44
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174503.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Scarborough Panel, Notice of Decision on minor variance for 42 Cedarview Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174504.pdf

MM38.45 - Extension of Fit up Period for Food Incubator Tenancy Program at 5200 Yonge Street - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Mike Colle recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct that the City assume all operating costs until January 11, 2022 for the City-initiated food incubator tenancy program at 5200 Yonge Street due to delays outside of the vendors' control in getting the space ready for a successful launch.

Summary

In May of 2021, City Council approved the creation of a food incubator tenancy program at 5200 Yonge Street to assist four start-up food entrepreneurs, with a focus on providing opportunities for members of communities which have traditionally been disadvantaged.

 

 Four vendors and a non-profit lead organization were selected. The initial plan was to begin operations this past summer but the start date was moved back several times for a variety of reasons entirely outside of the vendors' control. Although they are now able to access the space, there remains a number of serious barriers to a successful launch. Accordingly, the fit-up period during which no payment is collected should be extended for one month to January 11, 2022.

 

The Motion is urgent because the new entrepreneurs we are committed to helping require this immediate  assistance  in order to successfully launch their businesses.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.45
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174507.pdf

MM38.46 - Minor Variance Approval to 8 Elm Street Planning Application - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - University - Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize, pursuant to Subsection 45(1.4) of the Planning Act, submission of a Minor Variance application with respect to the properties municipally known as 8 Elm Street and 348-354 and 356 Yonge Street for relief from site-specific Zoning By-laws approved by the Ontario Land Tribunal on July 30, 2021, in order to vary development standards related to minimum parking requirements and that the variance would be subject to the following conditions:

 

a. provide a dedicated bicycle ramp and/or bicycle elevator as a means of access between the bicycle parking area and the exterior;


b. making transit information available to residents, such as transit route. schedules, maps and brochures. Such information will be provided to residents in the form of an information package at the time of occupancy;


c. provide one (1) one-time pre-loaded Presto card per unit to the value of $150 – to be offered in the first five years of occupancy;

 

d. provide residents of the new building with information regarding existing cycling facilities and destinations (trails, bicycle lanes, parks, etc.) within the building lobby; such information will also be provided to residents in the form of an information package at the time of occupancy;


e. provide one (1) bike repair station on-site;


f. provide one (1) Bike Share Toronto station within the surrounding area;


g. provide one (1) one-time annual Bike Share Toronto membership per unit – to be provided within the first five years of occupancy of a unit;


h. provide two (2) car share spaces on-site;


i. provide two (2) parking spaces for use by staff of the community space at no cost;


j. provide one (1) one-time annual Car Share membership per unit to be provided within the first five years of occupancy of a unit;


k. development shall provide a minimum 5m2 outdoor pet relief area, a 40 m2 outdoor off-leash area and a 6.0 m2 pet wash station;


l. development shall be subject to the following: a maximum height of 218.2m (to the top of the mechanical penthouse excluding any permitted projections), 10% of the total number of units as three bedroom units, 30% of the total number of units as two bedroom units and a maximum total gross floor area calculated based on By-law 569-2013 of 55,000 square metres (of which a minimum of 471.4 square metres must be for community space and a minimum of 945 square metres must be for non-residential uses within the base building on 356 Yonge Street); and


m. enter into an agreement with the City pursuant to Section 45 (9) of the Planning Act, the details of which will be determined to the satisfaction of the landowner and City Staff.

Summary

In 2021, Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 569-2013 were amended to permit a mixed use development on the property municipally known as 8 Elm Street and 348-354 and 356 Yonge Street.  The development approval was for one tower including an on-site 471 m2 community facility. The applicant has since requested that the number of vehicular parking spaces on the development site be amended, and is seeking variances for that reduction. Staff are supportive of this amendment, if the conditions outlined by them can be successfully met.

 

This Motion is urgent to allow the developer to continue with their site plan application and construct housing as soon as possible.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.46
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174509.pdf

MM38.47 - Request to Amend the 2021 Parks Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for the Greenwood Park Dogs Off Leash Area Improvements Project - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Toronto - Danforth
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2021-2030 Council Approved Capital Budget and Plan for the Greenwood Park Dogs Off Leash Area Improvements sub-project in the Park Development project, in the amount of $0.579 million, increasing the total project cost from $0.250 million to $0.829 million, with cash flow commitments in 2022, fully funded by $0.250 million from the South District Parkland Development Cash-in-lieu Reserve Fund (XR2209) and $0.329 million from various Section 42 Above 5 percent Cash-in-lieu listed in the table below, for the purpose of awarding a contract for improvements to the dogs off leash area in Greenwood Park:

 

Development Location

Internal Order

Account

(XR2213)

Amount

1395 Gerrard Street East

4200099

$146.63

1430 Gerrard Street East

4200344

$12,527.99

39 Connaught Avenue

4200571

$1,564.69

1321 Gerrard Street East

4200544

$1,804.15

264B Hastings Avenue

4200586

$419.17

63 Dagmar Avenue

4200845

$1,177.24

169 Jones Avenue

4201020

$2,482.42

175 Jones Avenue

4201019

$4,399.87

182 Rhodes Avenue

4201061

$82.23

96 Coxwell Avenue

4201064

$200,926.97

569 Craven Road

4201224

$19,826.71

109 Knox Avenue

4201243

$30,531.33

109 Rhodes Avenue

4201472

$23,050.00

389 R Leslie Street

4201413

$15,396.60

1A Ivy Avenue

4201516

$14,664.00

Total

$329,000.00

 

Summary

This Motion requests authority from Council to amend the 2021 Council Approved Capital Budget and 2022-2030 Capital Plan for Parks, Forestry and Recreation in the amount of $0.579 million for improvements to the dogs off leash area in Greenwood Park. Additional funds are required to support the scope of work that meets the needs of the community and to award a contract that exceeds the available budget. The total project cost would be amended from $0.250 million to $0.829 million, with cash flow commitments in 2022.

 

The improvements will be fully funded from the following sources: $0.250 million from the South District Parkland Development Cash-in-lieu Reserve Fund (XR2209) and $0.329 million from various Section 42 Above 5 percent Cash-in-lieu generated from developments in proximity to Greenwood Park. These funds have been received and are eligible for these purposes.

 

Operating impacts, if required, will be submitted for consideration through future budget submissions.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.47
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174510.pdf

MM38.48 - Streamlined Permit Renewal Application Process for Farmers' Markets - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the April 26, 2022 meeting of the Infrastructure and Environment Committee meeting  on a new streamlined application process for renewing permits for long-standing farmers' markets in City Parklands.

Summary

There are many fantastic farmers' markets that take place in Toronto parks each year. These markets provide our communities with locally grown, fresh food, they connect Toronto residents to local Ontario farmers and producers, and support healthy communities. They are mostly run by volunteers who commit their time and energy to the success of these much loved annual events.

 

The current process to renew Special Event permits for City Parklands is time-consuming and burdensome on the volunteers. The forms ask for information that the City of Toronto Permit Office already has on hand for markets that return to the same location year after year. Streamlining this process would reduce the workload on the volunteers and help them obtain permits in a timely manner.

 

Farmers' markets are loved by residents who flock to them from one end of the city to the other. They provide residents with access to healthy food and they become local community hubs connecting residents of all ages and backgrounds. Reducing the barriers by streamlining the permit process for long-standing markets will help ensure the success of these markets.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.48
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174511.pdf

MM38.49 - Interim Relocation of YMCA to St. Patrick's Market - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - Spadina - Fort York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1. City Council adopt the recommendations in the report (December 16, 2021) from the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management:

 

1. City Council authorize the City to enter into a five-year, below market rent lease agreement (the "Lease") with YMCA of Greater Toronto (the "Tenant") for the use of approximately 5,426 square feet of the main floor of the building located at 238 Queen Street West known as St. Patrick's Market (the "Leased Premises"), substantially on the major terms and conditions as set out in Attachment 1,  and other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, or their designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council authorize the City to terminate the Metro Hall lease (the "Metro Hall Lease") between the City and YMCA with a commencement date of January 1, 2010 for premises located on a portion of the ground floor, the first sub-floor and the third floor of Metro Hall by providing one months' notice to the YMCA in accordance with the overholding provisions in the Metro Hall Lease.

 

3. City Council make a grant to the Tenant in the amount of up to $1,000,000 to cover the Tenant's relocation and leasehold improvement costs in accordance with section 83 of City of Toronto Act, 2006 and City Council determine it is in the interests of the City to make the grant to the Tenant.

 

4. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management to enter into a construction agreement with YMCA to carry out capital repair work required to bring the building known as St. Patrick's Market into a state of good repair and in compliance with the City's obligations under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, at a cost up to $1,233,000 (net of Harmonized Sales Tax) on terms acceptable to the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2. City Council request the Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to work with the YMCA of Greater Toronto to provide fresh food and food-market animation at St. Patrick's Market, including considering using St. Patrick's Square and additional vacant space within the Market building for these purposes.

Summary

City staff require authorization to enter into a temporary 5-year below-market agreement with the YMCA of Greater Toronto to occupy the ground floor of St. Patrick's Market and conduct repairs to the building on behalf of the City.

 

This interim use of St. Patrick's Market will allow for continuity of YMCA that need to relocate from Metro Hall, and begin to animate the previously underutilized heritage landmark on Queen Street.

 

Work continues with City staff and the surrounding community to add additional interim activities at St. Patrick's Market and adjacent St. Patrick's Square during this 5-year period. Complementary food market activity is an active conservation with the YMCA and potential partners like St. Lawrence Market.

 

I am also working with City staff on community engagement to determine the permanent, long-term vision for St. Patrick's Market as a potential community hub and local landmark. Public meetings will be held in 2022.

 

This Motion is urgent because the tenant requires access to the leased premises to proceed with the commencement of major construction and building alterations in January 2022, with a planned activation date of December 2022.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.49
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174542.pdf
(December 16, 2021) Report from the on Executive Director, Corporate Real Estate Management on YMCA Relocation to St. Patrick's Market
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174541.pdf

MM38.50 - Extending Repayment Due Date for Eligible Properties from the 2020 Property Tax Deferral Program - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Josh Matlow

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* * This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item EX27.11. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Bill 1048 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 767, Taxation, Property Tax, to change the repayment due date for eligible properties approved for the 2020 COVID-19 Property Tax Payment Deferral Program from November 30, 2020 to June 30, 2021 by deleting the following Section 767-7G (2)(a):

 

(a) the taxes on the eligible property are not paid in full on or before November 30, 2020; or

 

and replacing it with the following new Section 767-7G (2)(a):

 

(a) the taxes on the eligible property for the 2020 taxation year are not paid in full on or before June 30, 2021; or

 

2. City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary Bills in Council to give effect to City Council's decision.

Summary

City Council adopted Item EX27.11 Summary of COVID-19 Property Tax Deferral Program at its meeting on November 9, 10 and 12, 2021.

 

The COVID-19 Property Tax Deferral Program was adopted by Council to provide financial support to residents and businesses that faced loss of income and revenues due to the provincial shutdown during the first wave of the pandemic. Property owners that applied and were approved for the program were eligible to defer property tax payments for the 2020 taxation year and the City would waive all interest and fees provided that the City received full payment of all taxes due on or before November 30, 2020.

 

Certain eligible properties that were unable to meet this repayment deadline are still facing many of the same financial pressures that they were last year when this program was implemented due to lock downs throughout the first half of 2021 and capacity limits that continue to be in place for some businesses. Most recently, the Province has paused the lifting of capacity limits in higher-risk settings including food and drink establishments with dance facilities such as night clubs and wedding receptions, strip clubs, sex clubs and bathhouses. It is for these residents and businesses that I ask Council to consider extending the payment due date to June 30, 2021 through a by-law amendment to provide the financial relief originally sought in applying for this program.

 

Staff have advised that 46 out of the 50 properties that did not meet the original repayment due date would benefit from extending the due date to June 30, 2021 as they have since paid their 2020 property taxes in full. Amounts waived would be applied as credits to the property tax account.  The total amount of fees, interest and penalties that the City would be waiving as a result of this motion are summarized below.  Amounts to be waived will be funded from the 2021 Non-Program Tax Deficiency account, with no impact on current or future year budgets.

 

Account Type

Number of Accounts

Total Penalty, Fees and Interest added as of November 30, 2020

Residential

35

$3,857

Non-Residential

11

$12,456

Grand Total

46

$16,313

 

REQUIRES RE-OPENING:

 

Item EX27.11 (November 9, 10 and 12, 2021 City Council Meeting only as it pertains to the repayment date for eligible properties.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.50
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174555.pdf

MM38.51 - Strengthening Tenant Voices at Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailao

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailao, recommends that:

 

1.  To support an effective transition of operations from Toronto Community Housing Corporation to Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation and the successful implementation of the Integrated Service Model, City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, to have City staff, through the Tenants First initiative, lead the Senior Tenant Advisory Committee),  oversee the recruitment and confirmation of new members, invite current members of the Senior Tenant Advisory Committee to continue their membership to provide continuity of leadership, and ensure that senior tenants can directly access, inform and influence services and programs to be provided by the new corporation.

 
2.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services, to undertake a review of the role and term of the Senior Tenant Advisory Committee  in 2022 and provide a report to the Economic and Community Development Committee on April 28, 2022 with recommendations regarding the future of the STAC.

 
3.  City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Community and Social Services through the Tenants First initiative, to engage with the Seniors Tenant Advisory Committee to provide advice and recommendations to the Board of Directors of the Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation on the principals and methods for a tenant engagement system and a summary of the engagement be reported to the Economic and Community Development Committee prior to the transfer of operations of the seniors housing to the Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation.


4.  City Council direct the General Manager, Seniors Services and Long-term Care, to lead a review of the Seniors Health and Wellness model, including how hub sites are selected and make recommendations to Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation related to implementation.

 
5.  City Council request the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, given feedback from senior tenants, to remove 145 Strathmore Boulevard from consideration as a hub site pending review of Seniors Health and Wellness model.

Summary

Through the City's Tenants First Project, the City has focused on listening to and responding to tenants voices.

 

Earlier this year, through the adoption of EX23.4 Council directed the creation of Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation and the transition of operations of 14,000 seniors mandated unit at Toronto Community Housing Corporation to the Toronto Senior Housing Corporation. This transition is the result of work over several years to engage with tenants and make positive change at the Toronto Community Housing Corporation. Through the adoption of EX7.1 in 2019, Council directed City staff to work with the Toronto Community Housing Corporation to establish a Senior Tenants Advisory Committee to ensure that senior tenants can directly access, inform and influence services and programs to be provided by the new Seniors Housing Corporation.

 

This Motion reinforces the City’s leadership of the Seniors Tenant Advisory Committee and the ongoing work to engage with tenants in decision-making on the future of their housing. The next year will be crucial in ensuring that tenant voices are centred in the transition of operations from the Toronto Community Housing Corporation to the Toronto Seniors Housing Corporation. To further strengthen this process, it is recommended that current Seniors Tenant Advisory Committee members be provided the opportunity to remain on the Committee and that the terms of reference be broadened to include providing input into both the Integrated Service Model and the transition of operations.

 

Through the implementation of the Integrated Service Model, consistent feedback has been heard from tenants of 145 Strathmore about the possibility of a Seniors Health and Wellness Hub at this location. Tenants have expressed concern and we need to listen to them. To support the community and move forward, the Toronto Community Housing Corporation should consider removing this building from future consideration as a Seniors Health and Wellness Hub.

Background Information

Member Motion MM38.51
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2021/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-174577.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 38

BL38.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact General Bills and Confirming Bills.


Consolidated Bills Index for December 15 and 16, 2021 City Council Meeting
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewBillBylaw.do?meeting=2021.CC38

Background Information

Consolidated By-law Index for December 15, 16 and 17, 2021 City Council Meeting
http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewBillBylaw.do?meeting=2021.CC38

Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council