City Council

Meeting No.:
11
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
clerk@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed.  The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

 

Members of Council and Staff:  Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended.  The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements:  If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

 

September 16, 2011

 


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at  www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

City Council - Routine Matters - Meeting 11

RM11.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

  • O Canada
  • Moment of Silence
  • Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Background Information

Condolence Motion for The Honourable Jack Layton
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41070.pdf
Condolence Motion for Hilary Bell
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41071.pdf
Condolence Motion for homeless persons
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41073.pdf
Condolence Motion for Jack Roper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41072.pdf
Condolence Motion for Firefighter Sylvester J. Maj
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41260.pdf
Condolence Motion for Mary Carroll
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41201.pdf
Condolence Motion for Wade Belak
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41202.pdf
Condolence Motion for the Lokomotiv Ice Hockey Team
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41203.pdf

RM11.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting on July 12, 13 and 14, 2011.

RM11.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Deferred Committee Items:

Licensing and Standards Committee Item LS4.3

Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY8.2

 

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 9 on September 6, 2011

                        Submitted by Mayor Rob Ford, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 4 on July 22, 2011

                          Submitted by Councillor Frances Nunziata, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 6 on August 2, 2011

                          Submitted by Councillor Frances Nunziata, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 8 on August 4, 2011

                          Submitted by Councillor Frances Nunziata, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 9 on September 1, 2011

                          Submitted by Councillor Frances Nunziata, Chair

 

Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 7 on September 14, 2011

                        Submitted by Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Chair

 

Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 7 on September 14, 2011

                       Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 7 on September 15, 2011

                       Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Licensing and Standards Committee from Meeting 8 on September 15, 2011

                       Submitted by Councillor Cesar Palacio, Chair

  

Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 7 on September 15, 2011

                        Submitted by Councillor Norman Kelly, Chair

 

Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 7 on September 7, 2011

                        Submitted by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 9 on September 12, 2011

                        Submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 9 on September 12, 2011

                        Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 9 on September 12, 2011

                        Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 9 on September 12, 2011

                        Submitted by Councillor Gord Perks, Chair

 

New Business submitted by City Officials

 

RM11.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM11.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

RM11.6 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

September 21, 2011 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41067.pdf
September 22, 2011 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41122.pdf

City Council - Administrative Inquiries and Answers - Meeting 11

IA11.1 - Citizen Appointment Process, Access and Equity Considerations

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All
Attention
Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer Administrative Inquiries and Answers, without debate.
The City Manager has submitted an Answer to this Inquiry (IA11.1a)

Summary

Councillor Joe Mihevc has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

“I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry (under Municipal Code S27-61) to seek information from the Access and Equity unit of the City Manager's Office.

 

In all previous administrations since amalgamation, this information has been provided to help Toronto City Council assess whether Council's citizen appointments reflect the diversity of our city's residents.

 

The specific information I request is for the appointment recommendations from the nominations committee be reviewed from the following perspectives:

 

a)         Gender

b)         Racial diversity

c)         LGBT inclusion

d)         Aboriginal engagement

e)         Geographic representation by Community Council

 

I ask that this requested information be separated by each Agency/Board/Commission's proposed appointment as well as a summary of how the entire first round of appointments are reflected.

 

I further request that these results be compared with similar categories from previous administrations.”

Background Information

(September 6, 2011) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's West, regarding the Citizen Appointment Process, Access and Equity Considerations (IA11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-40559.pdf
(September 19, 2011) Answer from the City Manager (IA11.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-41075.pdf
(September 19, 2011) Diversity Summary of 2011 Appointments Process
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-41076.pdf

IA11.2 - Toronto Olympic Bid Decision

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All
Attention
Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer Administrative Inquiries and Answers, without debate.
The City Manager has submitted an Answer to this Inquiry (IA11.2a)
Mayor Rob Ford has submitted an Answer to this Inquiry (IA11.2b)

Summary

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

“I am submitting this Administrative Inquiry under Municipal Code S27-61 to seek information about the City's decision not to bid to host the 2020 Olympic Games. I am requesting a response from the City Manager and the Mayor to the following questions. This matter is of great enough significance that I believe it should have been presented to Council for discussion and deliberation in the first place.

 

The simple fact that the deadline for submissions passed without an expression of interest from the City of Toronto in not the main issue.  A passive non-decision is one thing, but having one Member of Council actively saying "no" and having it accepted as a final dictum is quite another. My chief concern is that a presentation was given and decision was made by the Mayor and accepted by staff without the benefit of Council's input. The Mayor and staff have a clear right not to support the bid, but for something as significant as this, it should have been brought to Council in the interest of open discussion and transparency.

 

City Council openly investigated, debated and voted on the 1996 and 2008 Olympic bids in addition to the 2015 Pan American Games.  The media, community and business groups, and general public were involved in those city-wide discussions lead by three different Mayors from those respective governments.  Unfortunately, Toronto City Council did not have this same opportunity to thoughtfully consider 2020 Olympic bid.

 

In the spirit of transparency and openness, then, I ask the following questions of Mayor Ford and the City Manager:

 

A.        OF MAYOR FORD

 

1.         Did you have meetings or discussions with representatives of the Canadian Olympic Committee or any working group, or proponents interested in pursuing a bid for the Olympic Games, or representatives of other levels of government before deciding on behalf of City Council to reject the option to bid on them?

 

2.         If so, when and with whom were these meetings held, and what information was provided about the cultural, social and financial impact of hosting the Games, as well as the possible long-term benefits and liabilities?

 

3.         Did you advise staff unilaterally that there would be no bid for the Games?

 

4.         Why was city council not informed, consulted, or advised of the Olympic proposal?

 

5.         Why was the general public not informed, consulted, or advised of the Olympic proposal?

 

B.        OF THE CITY MANAGER

 

1.         Were presentations made with City Staff in attendance by representatives of the Olympic Committee or working group or proponents interested in pursuing a bid for the Olympic Games?

 

2.         If so, when were these meetings held, and what information was provided about the cultural and financial impact of hosting the Games, as well as the long-term benefits and liabilities?

 

3.         Were City Staff directed by the Mayor or his office not to pursue a bid for the Olympic Games?

 

4.         Would you consider a decision to submit or reject a bid for the Olympic Games a decision most appropriately made by City Council?

Background Information

(September 6, 2011) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale, regarding the Toronto Olympic Bid Decision (IA11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-40560.pdf
(September 16, 2011) Answer from the City Manager regarding the Toronto Olympic Bid decision (IA11.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-41048.pdf
(September 21, 2011) Answer from Mayor Rob Ford regarding the Toronto Olympic Bid (IA11.2b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-41068.pdf

City Council - Deferred Items - Meeting 11

LS4.3 - Banning the Sale of Cats and Dogs in Pet Shops

(City Council on July 12, 13 and 14, 2011, deferred consideration of Item LS4.3 to the next regular City Council meeting on September 21 and 22, 2011.)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications LS4.3.49 to LS4.3.55 have been submitted on this Item.

Bill 1171 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 545, Licensing, Article XX, Pet Shops as per Appendix A of the report (May 13, 2011), from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards with the following additions:

 

a.         Section 545-256 (C).  Every keeper shall provide the purchaser of a cat or dog, the business name and address information concerning dogs and cats to be kept in the register as outlined in 545-256 (a). Every keeper shall post, in a conspicuous place a notice provided by Municipal Licensing and Standards Division, advising customers of the required content of the register.

 

b.         City Council require that pet stores provide monthly health assessment reports from a licensed vet (unless the cat or dog is held less than a month) on cats and dogs kept in the store and to keep records on all cats and dogs that receive vet care.

 

c.         City Council require pet stores to buy cats and dogs from reputable breeders certified by the City of Toronto (including registered Humane Society, registered shelter or rescue group, municipal animal shelter) and provide proof of where the animals were purchased.

 

2.         City Council request that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards work with the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (OSPCA) Investigation Unit on a continual basis to determine if any information exists related to the existence of puppy and kitten mills in Toronto; whether any City of Toronto pet shops are obtaining these dog and cats supplies from mills; and that staff take the appropriate enforcement action if these issues are uncovered.

 

3.         City Council request that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards take appropriate action, up to and including a report to the Licensing Tribunal recommending license revocation, if pet stores are found to purchase animals from puppy mills.

 

4.         City Council request that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards encourage residents to report the knowledge of any operating puppy / kitty mills in Toronto and that if the violations are substantiated, appropriate enforcement action be taken and maximum fines be requested.

 

5.         City Council request that the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards investigate sales of dogs and cats through home-based operations; including potential zoning and licensing infractions.

Origin

(May 13, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

The purpose of this report is to examine whether banning the sale of cats and dogs in pet shops and other retail outlets is an appropriate way to deal with concerns that members of the public submitted to the Licensing and Standards Committee.  The submissions proposed this ban in order to address the number of unwanted pets, impulse purchases of cats and dogs in pet stores, the supply and demand for dogs from puppy mills, the overpopulation of feral cats as well as the concerns about the care and treatment of cats and dogs kept in pet stores for sale.

 

Municipal Licensing and Standards recommends amendments to Article XX, Pet Shops of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 545, Licensing to clarify requirements for pet shop keepers.  In addition, MLS will ensure that establishments are regularly inspected for compliance.  MLS does not recommend an outright ban on the sale of cats and/or dogs, which could have a significant negative economic impact on pet shop owners.

 

The City Solicitor was consulted in the preparation of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 13, 2011) Staff Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on the Banning the Sale of Cats and Dogs in Pet Shops
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-38291.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

Deferred Item LS4.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40549.pdf
(June 14, 2011) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on a proposed amendment to Chapter 545 on banning the sale of cats and dogs in pet stores (LS4.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40550.pdf
(June 10, 2011) Confidential Attachment 1 to the report from the City Solicitor

Speakers

Dean Maher
Ken Wood
Barbara Rose
Fern Sinkins
Keith Burgess, on behalf of Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council of Canada (PIJAC) (Submission Filed)
Rob Goddard, President, Helping Homeless Pets
Kate Steen
Alana Bjorn
Adam J. Bull, Paws Angels
Emmanouil John, Martha's Pet and Aquarium
Paul York
Susan Dankeet, PIJAC Canada
Councillor Michelle Berardinetti

Communications (Committee)

(May 26, 2011) E-mail from Romani Bays (LS.New.LS4.3.1)
(May 26, 2011) E-mail from Paul Fortin (LS.New.LS4.3.2)
(May 26, 2011) E-mail from Tita Zierer (LS.New.LS4.3.3)
(May 26, 2011) Letter from DVM Jeff Rabinovitch, Bridletowne Warden Animal Hospital (LS.New.LS4.3.4)
(May 27, 2011) E-mail from Peter Clarke (LS.New.LS4.3.5)
(May 27, 2011) E-mail from Diane Balcerczyk (LS.New.LS4.3.6)
(May 27, 2011) E-mail from Lynda C. Nanders (LS.New.LS4.3.7)
(May 27, 2011) E-mail from Actions Speak Louder (Calgary) (LS.New.LS4.3.8)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Kaiser (LS.New.LS4.3.9)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Morley Shayuk (LS.New.LS4.3.10)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Anne Griffin (LS.New.LS4.3.11)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Ashley Saunders (LS.New.LS4.3.12)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Deanna Bliuvas (LS.New.LS4.3.13)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Karen-Anne Levo and Robert Love (LS.New.LS4.3.14)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Beatrice Weber (LS.New.LS4.3.15)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Janice ter Borg (LS.New.LS4.3.16)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Ada (LS.New.LS4.3.17)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Kathie Corrigan (LS.New.LS4.3.18)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Barbara L. Macdonald (LS.New.LS4.3.19)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Sinem Ketenci and Kyle Sabo (LS.New.LS4.3.20)
(May 28, 2011) E-mail from Lisa Wursta (LS.New.LS4.3.21)
(May 29, 2011) E-mail from Diane Cartwright (LS.New.LS4.3.22)
(May 29, 2011) E-mail from Beth Gaskins (LS.New.LS4.3.23)
(May 29, 2011) E-mail from Elysa Graci (LS.New.LS4.3.24)
(May 29, 2011) E-mail from Lucy Kovaliv (LS.New.LS4.3.25)
(May 29, 2011) E-mail from Marie-Lynn Hammond (LS.New.LS4.3.26)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Nikki Strumenik (LS.New.LS4.3.27)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Annmarie (LS.New.LS4.3.28)
(August 10, 2010) Letter from Kerry Vinson, Animal Behaviour Consultants (LS.New.LS4.3.29)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Heidi Welker (LS.New.LS4.3.30)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Jamie Baxter Camp (LS.New.LS4.3.31)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from JoAnn Visaretis (LS.New.LS4.3.32)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Marena (LS.New.LS4.3.33)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Michelle Wozny (LS.New.LS4.3.34)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Shannon Kornelsen (LS.New.LS4.3.35)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Juli Kaiss (LS.New.LS4.3.36)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Febel (LS.New.LS4.3.37)
(May 3, 2011) Letter from Fleming Pavlovski, Critters Castle Pet Shop Inc. (LS.New.LS4.3.38)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Annalea Pippus (LS.New.LS4.3.39)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Juli Kaiss (LS.New.LS4.3.40)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Melissa Knight (LS.New.LS4.3.41)
(May 30, 2011) E-mail from Sandra Lovell (LS.New.LS4.3.42)
(May 31, 2011) E-mail from Wade Shaw (LS.New.LS4.3.43)
(May 30, 2011) Letter from Alison Davies (LS.New.LS4.3.44)
(May 31, 2011) Letter from Denise Dove (LS.New.LS4.3.45)
(May 31, 2011) Submission from PIJAC Canada (LS.New.LS4.3.46)
(May 31, 2011) E-mail from Daniela Caruso (LS.New.LS4.3.47)
(May 31, 2011) E-mail from Cheryl Seibel (LS.New.LS4.3.48)

Communications (City Council)

(May 28, 2011) Letter from Florence Orr (CC.Main.LS4.3.49)
(June 2, 2011) E-mail from Dean Maher (CC.Main.LS4.3.50)
(June 10, 2011) E-mail from Mia Riback (CC.Supp.LS4.3.51)
(June 8, 2011) E-mail from Stacey Halliday, Director of Marketing, PJ's Pets (CC.Supp.LS4.3.52)
(June 11, 2011) E-mail from Dawn van Nostrand (CC.Supp.LS4.3.53)
(June 14, 2011) E-mail from Susan Dankert, Communications Advisor, PIJAC Canada (CC.New.LS4.3.54)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Carol Johnston (CC.Main.LS4.3.55)

EY8.2 - Final Report - 501 Alliance Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications

(Deferred by City Council from July 12, 2011 - 2011.EY8.2)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (June 3, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with Attachment 6 amended by adding to Policy No. 366, the words "and an encroachment into the Parks and Open Space Areas for truck manoeuvring is also permitted" so that Policy No. 366 now reads:

 

            366.     501 Alliance Avenue

 

                        A Private Vocational School is permitted, and an encroachment into the Parks and Open Space Areas for truck manoeuvring is also permitted.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 1-83 the former City of York Zoning By-law substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (June 3, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the issuance of the Notice of Approval Condition for the Site Plan Approval Application and that the owner satisfy all the pre-approval conditions in the Notice of Approval Conditions including the following:

 

a.         Require the owner to enter into an encroachment agreement, to the satisfaction of the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Urban Forestry and Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to continue the use of the existing turning area for the loading facilities.

 

5.         City Council require that the pre-approval conditions in the Notice of Approval Conditions for the Site Plan Approval Application include the following:

 

            a.         Require the owner to post a Letter of Credit as security for any work required by the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, Urban Forestry and Parks, Forestry and Recreation in connection with the encroachment agreement for the lands used as a turning area for the loading facilities, equal to 120% of its value.

 

            b.         Require the owner, upon satisfactory completion of any work required in connection with the encroachment agreement, to guarantee such work and associated materials.  The owner will provide certification from their Landscape Architect certifying all work has been completed.  As-built drawings will be submitted to Parks, Forestry and Recreation (Development Application Unit).  At that time, the submitted letters of credit will be released, less 20% which shall be retained for a two-year period as a performance guarantee.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 22, 2011, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

 

Etobicoke York Community Council requested the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with officials from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to report directly to City Council with respect to the encroachment agreement set out in Recommendation 4a.

Origin

(June 3, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to permit a vocational school within the existing four storey building at 501 Alliance Avenue. In addition, the applicant is seeking a site specific zoning amendment to revise the parking requirement for the site.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 3, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications at 501 Alliance Avenue.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-38653.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

Deferred Item EY8.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40610.pdf

Speakers

Dan Odorico, President, Downing Street Group

Executive Committee - Meeting 7

EX7.18 - Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget (Item BU12.7)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee deferred the item indefinitely.

Origin

(June 7, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The Budget Committee at its meeting on June 7, 2011, considered a letter (May 9, 2011) from the Board of Health, entitled "Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget" (BU12.7).

 

Background Information (Committee)

Letter from the Budget Committee respecting Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget (Item BU12.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-38952.pdf

Executive Committee - Meeting 9

EX9.3 - Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2010

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council treat the Council meeting at which this report is considered as the 2010 Annual General Meeting of the  Shareholder for Build Toronto Inc. by:

 

a.         receiving the Annual Report of  Build Toronto Inc., (Attachment 1 of the report (August 22, 2011) from the City Manager);

 

b.         appointing Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Build Toronto Inc. for fiscal year 2011, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Build Toronto to fix the remuneration of such Auditor; and

 

c.         receiving the report (August 12, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, titled "Build Toronto Inc. 2010 Audited Financial Statements", (Attachment 2 of the report (August 22, 2011) from the City Manager); and receiving Build Toronto's 2010 Annual Audited Financial Statements (Appendix A of Attachment 2 of the report (August 22, 2011) from the City Manager); and

 

2.         City Council forward a copy of Build Toronto's 2010 Audited Annual Financial Statements (Appendix A of Attachment 2 of the report (August 22, 2011) from the City Manager) to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3.         City Council request Build Toronto to provide a list of senior management and their compensation packages for 2009 and 2010 and on an annual basis with its financial statements.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee requested the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Build Toronto to be present during Council's consideration of the item.

Origin

(August 22, 2011) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the 2010 Annual General Meeting of the shareholder of Build Toronto Inc. including receipt of Audited Financial Statements and appointment of the auditor. 

 

Background Information (Committee)

(August 22, 2011) Staff Report - Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2010
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40306.pdf
Attachment 1 to the Staff Report - Build Toronto 2010 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40307.pdf
(August 22, 2011) Attachment 2 with Appendix A to the Staff Report - Build Toronto Inc. - 2010 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40308.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(August 31, 2011) E-mail from Peter Clarke (EX.New.EX9.3.1)

EX9.4 - Invest Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2010

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider the Council meeting to be the 2010 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Invest Toronto Inc. by:

 

a.         receiving the Annual Report of Invest Toronto Inc., dated  May 25, 2011, Attachment 1 to the report (August 22, 2011) from the City Manager;

 

b.         appointing Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP , Chartered Accountants, as the auditor for Invest Toronto for fiscal year 2011, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Invest Toronto to fix their remuneration; and

 

c.         receiving the report (August 12, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, titled, "Invest Toronto Inc. 2010 Audited Financial Statements",  (Attachment 2 to the report (August 22, 2011) from the City Manager); and receiving Invest Toronto's 2010 Annual Audited Financial Statements, (Appendix A to Attachment 2 of the report (August 22, 2011) from the City Manager); and

 

2.         City Council forward a copy of Invest Toronto's 2010 Audited Annual Financial Statements forming Appendix A to Attachment 2 to the report (August 22, 2011) from the City Manager, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3.         City Council request Invest Toronto to provide a list of senior management and their compensation packages for 2009 and 2010 and on an annual basis with its financial statements.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee requested the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Invest Toronto to be present during Council's consideration of the item.

Origin

(August 22, 2011) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the 2010 Annual General Meeting of the shareholder of Invest Toronto Inc., including receipt of Audited Financial Statements and appointment of the Auditor.

 

Background Information (Committee)

(August 22, 2011) Staff Report - Invest Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2010
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40309.pdf
Attachment 1 to Staff Report - Invest Toronto 2010 Inaugural Year Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40310.pdf
(August 22, 2011) Attachment 2 to Staff Report - Invest Toronto Inc. - 2010 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40311.pdf

EX9.5 - Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2010

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider the Council meeting to be the 2010 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation by:

 

a.         receiving the Annual Report of the City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation operating under the name of Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC), dated August 16, 2011, (Attachment 1 of the report (August 19, 2011) from the City Manager);

 

b.         appointing PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor for TPLC for fiscal year 2011, and authorizing the corporation’s Board of Directors to fix their remuneration; and

 

c.         receiving the report (August 19, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, titled “Toronto Port Lands Company – 2010 Audited Financial Statements”, (Attachment 2 to the report  (August 19, 2011) from the City Manger); and receiving Audited Annual Financial Statements, (Appendix A of Attachment 2 of the report (August 19, 2011) from the City Manager; and

 

2.         City Council forward a copy of the 2010 Audited Annual Financial Statements (Appendix A of Attachment 2 of the report (August 19, 2011) from the City Manager, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3.         City Council request Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC) to provide a list of senior management and their compensation packages for 2009 and 2010 and on an annual basis with its financial statements.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee requested the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Toronto Port Lands Company to be present during Council's consideration of the item.

Origin

(August 19, 2011) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the 2010 Annual General Meeting of the shareholder of City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation (TEDCO) operating under the name of Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC) including receipt of Audited Financial Statements and appointment of the Auditor.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 19, 2011) Staff Report - Toronto Port Lands Company - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2010
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40313.pdf
(August 16, 2011) Letter to the City Manager - City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation, Operating as Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC): 2010 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40315.pdf
(August 23, 2011) Attachment 2 to the Staff Report - Toronto Port Lands Company - 2010 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40314.pdf

EX9.6 - Toronto Port Lands Company - Revitalization Opportunities for the Port Lands

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Time:
September 21, 2:00 PM
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this item (EX9.6a)

Communications EX9.6.218 to EX9.6.330, and petitions EX9.6.331 and EX9.6.332 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Manager to:

 

a.         Provide notice under the Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") dated March 31, 2006 substantially in the form attached as Attachment 1 and enter into discussions with Waterfront Toronto, and the Provincial and Federal governments to review the revitalization  delivery model for the Port Lands under the MOU;

 

b.         Enter into discussions with Waterfront Toronto and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority to re-evaluate the delivery of flood protection; and

 

c.         Direct appropriate staff to pause any further actions that implement the Lower Don Lands framework as they relate to the Port Lands including any on-going Ontario Municipal Board processes.

 

2.         City Council adopt the following as a resolution of the shareholder of Toronto Port Lands Company (TPLC):

 

a.         Pursuant to paragraph 4.1 of the Shareholder Direction to TPLC dated November 13, 2008, the Board of Directors will be composed of 9 Directors comprised of 2 members of City Council, 5 citizens, and 2 members of City staff;

 

b.         Council members will be nominated for appointment to the Board on the recommendation of the Striking Committee;

 

c.         Citizen members will be nominated for appointment to the Board by recommendation of the Corporations Nomination Panel established by the Mayor; and

 

d.         City staff members will be nominated for appointment to the Board by the Corporations Nominating Panel, upon receipt of recommendations made to the Panel by the City Manager.

 

3.         City Council direct the Nominating Panel and the Striking Committee to provide their recommendations to enable the replacement Board of Directors to be appointed as soon as possible.

 

4.         City Council direct the City Manager, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager responsible for the Waterfront Initiative, appropriate City staff and the new Board of TPLC, to review the Shareholder Direction for TPLC to recommend to Council the appropriate amendments to implement a revision to TPLC's mandate to:

 

a.         Be the lead agency for the revitalization of the Port Lands;

 

b.         Pursue modifications of the Don Mouth Environmental Assessment; and

 

c.         Secure private sector and other opportunities for the provision of flood protection and infrastructure improvements in the Port Lands and to bring forward amendments as soon as possible for approval by City Council.

 

5.         City Council authorize, as part of the transition to the new Board, the current Board and staff of TPLC to undertake discussions and studies, within the current financial resources of TPLC, to enable the new Board to more quickly assess strategic and business options and to prepare and submit a business plan to City Council within six months that includes the identification of economic incentive tools for the revitalization of the Port Lands.

 

6.         City Council direct the City Manager to request that the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, City staff and the Toronto Port Lands Company ensure an open and transparent public participation program for the review of the Don Mouth Environmental Assessment and the TPLC Port Lands Revitalization Business Plan.

 

7.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Executive Committee on October 3, 2011, on any actions required to ensure that development to the north of the Keating Channel is not delayed by the actions set out in the report (August 22, 2011) from the City.

 

8.         City Council request the City Manager to report to the Executive Committee on November 1, 2011, on the progress being made in the creation and execution of the Toronto Port Lands Company's proposed business plan.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee requested Waterfront Toronto to provide information to City Council, at its meeting on September 21, 2011, on the costs of the Don Mouth Environmental Assessment Refined List of Alternatives, including flood protection, soil remediation, infrastructure improvements and other matters related to the cost of implementation.

Origin

(August 22, 2011) Report from the City Manager

Summary

The purpose of this report is to set in place a new direction to move forward with flood protection and revitalization activities in the Port Lands. The report identifies issues with the current revitalization strategy and recommends a new governance structure and shareholder direction for the City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation ("TEDCO"), currently conducting business under the name Toronto Port Lands Company ("TPLC").

 

The area at the east end of the Toronto Harbour, south of Lake Shore Boulevard East and west of Leslie Street contain about 404 hectares (1,000 acres) of land, much of it under-utilized. The revitalization of this entire area is currently coordinated by the Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation ("Waterfront Toronto"). Within this area, known as the "Port Lands", the City through TPLC owns 170 hectares (420 acres) of land, which is a significant City asset. The Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") among the City, Waterfront Toronto and TPLC signed in 2006 envisioned that the Port Lands would be transformed incrementally over a 25-year period.

 

In 2010, City Council endorsed the Don Mouth Naturalization and Port Lands Flood Protection Project Environmental Assessment which proposed flood protection for the Port Lands by creating three outlets across City-owned land. The cost of implementing the flood protection component of this project was estimated to be $634 million in 2010 dollars, excluding costs for land remediation and soil removal. The existing continuous land and streets would be separated into three redevelopment areas by the proposed redesign of the Don River. This would have the effect of limiting development potential on TPLC lands.

 

The proposed flood protection measures for the Port Lands are currently unfunded. Without flood protection, significant revitalization cannot occur.  Staff recommend that TPLC be granted authority to explore private sector and other options to front end infrastructure and flood protection costs in order to unlock development potential within the Port Lands.

 

Port Lands revitalization activities are subject to a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") among the City, Waterfront Toronto and TPLC. This report recommends that City Council direct the City Manager to provide notice of the City's intent to renegotiate the MOU and enter into discussions with Waterfront Toronto, the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada regarding their commitment to continue the revitalization of the Port Lands and alternative options to achieve this objective.

 

This report also recommends that the current transitional Board of Directors of TPLC be replaced with a strategically composed board of City Councillors, citizens and City staff in order to implement an expanded role for TPLC in the Port Lands.

 

Finally, this report recommends a framework for the assessment of alternative finance, area planning and development options for the Port Lands. A subsequent report will provide an implementation strategy recommended by the new TPLC Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 22, 2011) Staff Report - Toronto Port Lands Company - Revitalization Opportunities for the Port Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40318.pdf
(September 6, 2011) Funds Spent in the Port Lands to Date
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40556.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 21, 2011) supplementary report from the City Manager on the Toronto Port Lands Revitilization Opportunities (EX9.6a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41080.pdf

Speakers

Ms. Cynthia Wilkey, West Don Lands Committee
Ms. Julie Beddoes
Andrew Bourgeois
Paul Bedford
Tony Coombes, City Formation Inc.
Lester Brown
Dennis Findlay
Stig Harvor
Jane Robinson
Sam Bull
Karen Buck
Ulla Colgrass, York Quay Neighbourhood Association
Hamish Wilson
Jacob Louy
Anthony Castaneda
Larry Webb
Bruna Nota
Gene Desfor
Jennefer Laidley

Communications (Committee)

(August 29, 2011) E-mail from Andrew Bourgeois (EX.Supp.EX9.6.1)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Jeannette Hanna (EX.Supp.EX9.6.2)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Joan McCordic (EX.Supp.EX9.6.3)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Rachel Stuckey (EX.Supp.EX9.6.4)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Gregory Bonser (EX.Supp.EX9.6.5)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Eli Singer (EX.Supp.EX9.6.6)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Penelope Tyndale (EX.Supp.EX9.6.7)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Kim Solga (EX.Supp.EX9.6.8)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Stephanie Shorter (EX.Supp.EX9.6.9)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Anna Prodanou (EX.Supp.EX9.6.10)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Lee Boal (EX.Supp.EX9.6.11)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Andrew Moore (EX.Supp.EX9.6.12)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Alison Walden (EX.Supp.EX9.6.13)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Blair Francey (EX.Supp.EX9.6.14)
(August 30, 2011) E-mail from Peter Francey, Partner: CEO Trajectory, The Distillery (EX.Supp.EX9.6.15)
(August 31, 2011) E-mail from Gerald Fitzpatrick (EX.Supp.EX9.6.16)
(August 31, 2011) E-mail from Mike Scott (EX.Supp.EX9.6.17)
(August 31, 2011) E-mail from Paul Fung (EX.Supp.Ex9.6.18)
(August 31, 2011) E-mail from Don Baxter (EX.Supp.EX9.6.19)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Phil Goodfellow (EX.Supp.EX9.6.20)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Andrew Rocheleau (EX.Supp.EX9.6.21)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Joan York (EX.Supp.EX9.6.22)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Sam Bull (EX.Supp.EX9.6.23)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from John MacMillan (EX.Supp.EX9.6.24)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Stig Harvor (EX.Supp.EX9.6.25)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Cory Scott (EX.New.EX9.6.26)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Kamal Reilly (EX.New.EX9.6.27)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Sarah Rimmington (EX.New.EX9.6.28)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Miriam Verburg (EX.New.EX9.6.29)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Anne-Marie Klein (EX.New.EX9.6.30)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Paul Young, Health Promoter, South Riverdale Community Health Centre (EX.New.EX9.6.31)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from J. Robert Naylor (EX.New.EX9.6.33)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Suzanne Lake (EX.New.EX9.6.34)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Joan York (EX.New.EX9.6.35)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Janet Cornfield (EX.New.EX9.6.36)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Ian Cameron McDougall (EX.New.EX9.6.37)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Oliver Mannsfeldt (EX.New.EX9.6.38)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from John Tory, Chair, Greater Toronto Civic Action Alliance and Julia Deans, Chief Executive Officer, Greater Toronto Civic Action Alliance (EX.New.EX9.6.39)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/comm/communicationfile-24267.pdf
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Douglas Thoms (EX.New.EX9.6.40)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Brenda Roman (EX.New.EX9.6.41)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Katie Krelove (EX.New.EX9.6.42)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Joan McCalla (EX.New.EX9.6.43)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Anne Hume (EX.New.EX9.6.44)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from David Devine (EX.New.EX9.6.45)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Penny Lawler (EX.New.EX9.6.46)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from George Hume (EX.New.EX9.6.47)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from Christopher A. McIntosh (EX.New.EX9.6.48)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Joan York (EX.New.EX9.6.49)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Mary Neumann (EX.New.EX9.6.50)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Carolyn Peters (EX.New.EX9.6.51)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Illa Bossons (EX.New.EX9.6.52)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Anne Kotyk (EX.New.EX9.6.53)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Ian Cameron McDougall (EX.New.EX9.6.54)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Martin Lennox (EX.New.EX9.6.55)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Colin Powell (EX.New.EX9.6.56)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Nicholas Provart (EX.New.EX9.6.57)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from David Fontaine (EX.New.EX9.6.58)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Lisa Rostoks (EX.New.EX9.6.59)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from David Crawford (EX.New.EX9.6.60)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Anatolijs Venovcevs (EX.New.EX9.6.61)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Anne Johnston (EX.New.EX9.6.62)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Nick Collard (EX.New.EX9.6.63)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Larry Webb (EX.New.EX9.6.64)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Karen Seeley (EX.New.EX9.6.65)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Nick Collard (EX.New.EX9.6.66)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Mike Perozak (EX.New.EX9.6.67)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Joanna Kidd (EX.New.EX9.6.68)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Kelly Carmichael, East Toronto Community Coalition (EX.New.EX9.6.69)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Margo Welch (EX.New.EX9.6.70)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Jarrod Price (EX.New.EX9.6.71)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Colin Richards, Producer, Chopper Pictures Inc. (EX.New.EX9.6.72)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Karen Seeley (EX.New.EX9.6.73)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Mike Perozak (EX.New.EX9.6.74)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Joanna Kidd (EX.New.EX9.6.75)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Anthony Granville (EX.New.EX9.6.76)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Myles Mackenzie (EX.New.EX9.6.77)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Jesse LaChapelle (EX.New.EX9.6.78)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Jason Ramsay-Brown (EX.New.EX9.6.79)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Randy Buck (EX.New.EX9.6.80)
(August 31, 2011) E-mail from George Gray (EX.New.EX9.6.81)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Cynthia Wilkey, Chair, West Don Lands Committee (EX.New.EX9.6.82)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Paul J. Bedford (EX.New.EX9.6.83)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/comm/communicationfile-24311.pdf
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Jennefer Laidley and Gene Desfor (EX.New.EX9.6.84)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Stig Harvor (EX.New.EX9.6.85)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Karen Buck (EX.New.EX9.6.86)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Paul Chandler, Commodore, Outer Harbour Sailing Federation (EX.New.EX9.6.87)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from John Wilson (EX.New.EX9.6.88)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Jan Darby (EX.New.EX9.6.89)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Julie Gilmour (EX.New.EX9.6.90)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Jeremy Bowes (EX.New.EX9.6.91)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from John R. Carley, Co-Chair, Friends of the Spit (EX.New.EX9.6.92)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Annie Massey (EX.New.EX9.6.93)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Dickie (EX.New.EX9.6.94)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Marc Bendavid (EX.New.EX9.6.95)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Virginia Rankin, Producer, Netherwood Film Production Inc. (EX.New.EX9.6.96)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Aamir Hussain (EX.New.EX9.6.97)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Lizzie McNeeley (EX.New.EX9.6.98)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Melissa Jane Shaw (EX.New.EX9.6.99)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from George Prodanou and Anna Prodanou (EX.New.EX9.6.100)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Sheryl O'Connell (EX.New.EX9.6.101)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Angela Leach (EX.New.EX9.6.102)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Katherine Grainger (EX.New.EX9.6.103)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Denina Simmons (EX.New.EX9.6.104)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Jacqueline Carlson (EX.New.EX9.6.105)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Laura Kennedy-Rankin (EX.New.EX9.6.106)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Julie Beddoes (EX.New.EX9.6.107)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Gil Penalosa (EX.New.EX9.6.108)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Daniel Brent (EX.New.EX9.6.109)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Lisa Ferguson (EX.New.EX9.6.110)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Richard Greenblatt (EX.New.EX9.6.111)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Sean Hingston (EX.New.EX9.6.112)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Peter Tabuns, MPP, Toronto Danforth (EX.New.EX9.6.113)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Christopher E. Horne (EX.New.EX9.6.114)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Carlos Olavarrieta (EX.New.EX9.6.115)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from George Hume (EX.New.EX9.6.116)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Peter Clarke (EX.New.EX9.6.117)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Alastair Dickson (EX.New.EX9.6.118)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from John Wilson (EX.New.EX9.6.119)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Samantha Anderson (EX.New.EX9.6.120)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Richard Reinert (EX.New.EX9.6.121)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Vic Razgaitis (EX.New.EX9.6.122)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Leigh Himel (EX.New.EX9.6.123)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Dan Philips (EX.New.EX9.6.124)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Bill Murtagh (EX.New.EX9.6.125)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Dave Argles (EX.New.EX9.6.126)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Pierre Simpson (EX.New.EX9.6.127)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Bruna Nota (EX.New.EX9.6.128)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Laura Hill (EX.New.EX9.6.129)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Judy Gunhouse (EX.New.EX9.6.130)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Jim Ryan (EX.New.EX9.6.131)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Dennis Findlay (EX.New.EX9.6.132)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Dennis Findlay (EX.New.EX9.6.133)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Ulla Colgrass, Board Member, York Quay Neighbourhood Association (YQNA) (EX.New.EX9.6.134)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Indro Bhattacharyya (EX.New.EX9.6.135)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Sandra Gregson (EX.New.EX9.6.136)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from David Helleman (EX.New.EX9.6.137)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Kim Phillips (EX.New.EX9.6.138)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Toronto Island Community Association (EX.New.EX9.6.139)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Stig Harvor (EX.New.EX9.6.140)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Tammis Baker (EX.New.EX9.6.141)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Andrew Bourgeois (EX.New.EX9.6.142)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Lester Brown (EX.New.EX9.6.143)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Anne Morgan (EX.New.EX9.6.144)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Lesley Halcro (EX.New.EX9.6.145)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Laura Alderson (EX.New.EX9.6.146)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Jeff Mawle (EX.New.EX9.6.147)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Laurence Lui (EX.New.EX9.6.148)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Mark Brownlie (EX.New.EX9.6.149)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Stewart Bowland (EX.New.EX9.6.150)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Leya Matalas (EX.New.EX9.6.151)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Stewart Bowland (EX.New.EX9.6.152)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Brian O'Sullivan (EX.New.EX9.6.153)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from John Bowker (EX.New.EX9.6.154)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Greg Nickles (EX.New.EX9.6.155)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Chris Wardman (EX.New.EX9.6.156)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Lucy Shroff (EX.New.EX9.6.157)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Laura Cooper (EX.New.EX9.6.158)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Fadi Masoud (EX.New.EX9.6.159)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Nancy Miller (EX.New.EX9.6.160)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Greg Homonylo (EX.New.EX9.6.161)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Lesley Halcro (EX.New.EX9.6.162)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Janet Joy Wilson (EX.New.EX9.6.163)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Chris Chopik (EX.New.EX9.6.164)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Chris Drew (EX.New.EX9.6.165)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Lynn Pashleigh (EX.New.EX9.6.166)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Elizabeth Lines (EX.New.EX9.6.167)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Kyle Phillips (EX.New.EX9.6.168)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from David Eveline (EX.New.EX9.6.169)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Richard J. Anobile (EX.New.EX9.6.170)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Richard J. Anobile (EX.New.EX9.6.171)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Michael Kruse (EX.New.EX9.6.172)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Richard Greenblatt (EX.New.EX9.6.173)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Glennie Mercer, Glennie Mercer & Associates, Creating Connections (EX.New.EX9.6.174)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Linda Argles (EX.New.EX9.6.175)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Glennie Mercer, Glennie Mercer & Associates, Creating Connections (EX.New.EX9.6.176)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Linda Argles (EX.New.EX9.6.177)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Mike Perozak (EX.New.EX9.6.178)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Monica Resendes (EX.New.EX9.6.179)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Jana Neumann (EX.New.EX9.6.180)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Tom Ponessa (EX.New.EX9.6.181)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Gail Fraser (EX.New.EX9.6.182)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Kate Hoffmann and Asher Mercer (EX.New.EX9.6.183)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Pat Anderson (EX.New.EX9.6.184)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Nancy Miller (EX.New.EX9.6.185)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Bonnie Cleary (EX.New.EX9.6.186)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Lucy Shroff (EX.New.EX9.6.187)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Keith McCallum (EX.New.EX9.6.188)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Elayne Lockhart (EX.New.EX9.6.189)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Dayna McIsaac (EX.New.EX9.6.190)
(September 1, 2011) E-mail from George Hume (EX.New.EX9.6.191)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Judy Gunhouse (EX.New.EX9.6.192)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Dave Argles (EX.New.EX9.6.193)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Bill Murtagh, Linda Argles and Jennifer Argles (EX.New.EX9.6.194)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Margaret and Edward Lyons (EX.New.EX9.6.195)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Samantha Anderson (EX.New.EX9.6.196)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Leena Raudvee (EX.New.EX9.6.197)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Dominique and Fortunato (EX.New.EX9.6.198)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Sarah Hunt (EX.New.EX9.6.199)
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Peter Ciurczak (EX.New.EX9.6.200)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from James Huctwith (EX.New.EX9.6.201)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Justin Miron (EX.New.EX9.6.202)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Suzanne Kavanagh, President, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (EX.New.EX9.6.203)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Nadia Swaby (EX.New.EX9.6.204)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Marc Bendavid (EX.New.EX9.6.205)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Vesna Jocic (EX.New.EX9.6.206)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Akim Ade Larcher (EX.New.EX9.6.207)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Corrie Galloway (EX.New.EX9.6.208)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Misha Perozak (EX.New.EX9.6.209)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Annie Massey (EX.New.EX9.6.210)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Jim and Reet Macfarlane (EX.New.EX9.6.211)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Adam Eveline (EX.New.EX9.6.212)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from David Matarasso (EX.New.EX9.6.213)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Sean Beaton (EX.New.EX9.6.214)
(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Seam Hingston (EX.New.EX9.6.215)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Cathy Pickett (EX.New.EX9.6.216)
(September 4, 2011) E-mail from Marilyn A. Chapman (EX.New.EX9.6.217)

Communications (City Council)

(September 4, 2011) Letter from William B. Kay (CC.Main.EX9.6.218)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from David Demchuk (CC.Main.EX9.6.219)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Trae Bregg (CC.Main.EX9.6.220)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Lindsay Grant (CC.Main.EX9.6.221)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Nick Warzin (CC.Main.EX9.6.222)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Michael Kulas (CC.Main.EX9.6.223)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Christina Robins (CC.Main.EX9.6.224)
(September 7, 2011) Letter from James McMillan (CC.Main.EX9.6.225)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from John Goodwin (CC.Main.EX9.6.226)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from James Storie (CC.Main.EX9.6.227)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Marcel St. Pierre (CC.Main.EX9.6.228)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from J. Bryce Hallett (CC.Main.EX9.6.229)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Adam Gorley (CC.Main.EX9.6.230)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Stephanie Shorter (CC.Main.EX9.6.231)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Bridget MacIntosh (CC.Main.EX9.6.232)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Paul Jacobelli, President, EdTek Services, Inc. (CC.Main.EX9.6.233)
(September 8, 2011) E-mail from Kevin Clarke (CC.Main.EX9.6.234)
(September 8, 2011) E-mail from Tim Washington (CC.Main.EX9.6.235)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Margaret Buchinger (CC.Main.EX9.6.236)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Hector Urra (CC.Main.EX9.6.237)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Becca Young (CC.Main.EX9.6.238)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Dorianne Emmerton (CC.Main.EX9.6.239)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Todd Yeates (CC.Main.EX9.6.240)
(September 10, 2011) E-mail from Christel Kleitsch (CC.Main.EX9.6.241)
(September 10, 2011) E-mail from Randy Witten (CC.Main.EX9.6.242)
(September 11, 2011) E-mail from Stig Harvor (CC.Main.EX9.6.243)
(September 11, 2011) E-mail from Rebecca Osolen (CC.Main.EX9.6.244)
(September 11, 2011) E-mail from Owen Moorhouse (CC.Main.EX9.6.245)
(September 12, 2011) E-mail from Stig Harvor (CC.Main.EX9.6.246)
(September 13, 2011) E-mail from Julie Beddoes (CC.Main.EX9.6.247)
(September 13, 2011) E-mail from Jeff Good (CC.Main.EX9.6.248)
(September 13, 2011) E-mail from Linda Bromby (CC.Main.EX9.6.249)
(September 13, 2011) E-mail from Robert Hodge (CC.Main.EX9.6.250)
(September 13, 2011) E-mail from Michael Szego (CC.Main.EX9.6.251)
(September 13, 2011) E-mail from Susan James and Jorge Nef (CC.Main.EX9.6.252)
(September 14, 2011) Letter from George Milbrandt, Chair, St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area (CC.Main.EX9.6.253)
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from Gillian Hutchison (CC.Main.EX9.6.254)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Julie Beddoes (CC.Main.EX9.6.255)
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from Sue Joyce (CC.Main.EX9.6.256)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Eric Hacke (CC.Main.EX9.6.257)
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from David Steinberg (CC.Main.EX9.6.258)
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from Matthew Hill (CC.Main.EX9.6.259)
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from Matthew Hill (CC.Main.EX9.6.260)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Professor Elizabeth Littlejohn, Communication, Culture and Information Technology, Sheridan Institute of Technology and Advanced Learning (CC.Main.EX9.6.261)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Jane Kershaw (CC.Main.EX9.6.262)
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from Dr. Colman Hogan (CC.Main.EX9.6.263)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Marlies Burkhard (CC.Main.EX9.6.264)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Sharon Moodie (CC.Main.EX9.6.265)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Hector Urra (CC.Main.EX9.6.266)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Tara McKee (CC.Main.EX9.6.267)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Phil Bigelow (CC.Main.EX9.6.268)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Jaime Rosen (CC.Main.EX9.6.269)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Margaret McRae (CC.Main.EX9.6.270)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Ockert Fourie (CC.Main.EX9.6.271)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Sophia Fourie (CC.Main.EX9.6.272)
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from Steve Yeates (CC.Main.EX9.6.273)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Mark McKinney (CC.Main.EX9.6.274)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Mark O'Connell (CC.Main.EX9.6.275)
(September 15, 2011) Petition from 1,114 persons submitted via the online petition at www.change.org/petitions/city-councillors-respect-the-peoples-plan-for-the-waterfront (CC.Main.EX9.6.276)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-24762.pdf
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Jacqui Pegg (CC.Supp.EX9.6.277)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Randy Langlois (CC.Supp.EX9.6.278)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Andrew Heintzman (CC.Supp.EX9.6.279)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Mike Snetsinger (CC.Supp.EX9.6.280)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Mike Snetsinger (CC.Supp.EX9.6.281)
(September 15, 2011) E-mail from Bernie Matos (CC.Supp.EX9.6.282)
(September 16, 2011) E-mail from Pam Harrison (CC.Supp.EX9.6.283)
(September 16, 2011) E-mail from Cathy Pickett (CC.Supp.EX9.6.284)
(September 16, 2011) E-mail from Mano Narayanan (CC.Supp.EX9.6.285)
(September 16, 2011) E-mail from Anthony Castaneda (CC.Supp.EX9.6.286)
(September 16, 2011) E-mail from Jack Brannigan (CC.Supp.EX9.6.287)
(September 16, 2011) E-mail from David Hains (CC.Supp.EX9.6.288)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Monika Roschlaub (CC.Supp.EX9.6.289)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Fred Ollson (CC.Supp.EX9.6.290)
(September 18, 2011) E-mail from Stig Harvor (CC.Supp.EX9.6.291)
(September 18, 2011) E-mail from Daryl Sarkisian (CC.Supp.EX9.6.292)
(September 18, 2011) E-mail from Michael Werrett (CC.Supp.EX9.6.293)
(September 18, 2011) E-mail from Larry Webb (CC.Supp.EX9.6.294)
(September 17, 2011) E-mail from Vladimir and Alina Matus (CC.Supp.EX9.6.295)
(September 16, 2011) E-mail from Yvon Grenier (CC.Supp.EX9.6.296)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Don Baxter (CC.Supp.EX9.6.297)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Samantha Hodder (CC.Supp.EX9.6.298)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Brandon Quigley (CC.Supp.EX9.6.299)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Russ Boswell (CC.Supp.EX9.6.300)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Duncan Wood (CC.Supp.EX9.6.301)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Bonnie Anderson (CC.Supp.EX9.6.302)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Rolf Meindl (CC.Supp.EX9.6.303)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Ross McCallum (CC.Supp.EX9.6.304)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Penelope Tyndale (CC.Supp.EX9.6.305)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Che Yu Lin (CC.Supp.EX9.6.306)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Mark Hamilton (CC.Supp.EX9.6.307)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Catherine Bush (CC.Supp.EX9.6.308)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from David Footman (CC.Supp.EX9.6.309)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Elizabeth Severin (CC.Supp.EX9.6.310)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Sue Obata (CC.New.EX9.6.311)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Gary Martin (CC.New.EX9.6.312)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from M. Werrett (CC.New.EX9.6.313)
(September 19, 2011) E-mail from Bob Jones (CC.New.EX9.6.314)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from B. H. Yael (CC.New.EX9.6.315)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Amy Norris (CC.New.EX9.6.316)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Margaret Bush (CC.New.EX9.6.317)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Penny Kinnear (CC.New.EX9.6.318)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Stig Harvor (CC.New.EX9.6.319)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Rean Cross (CC.New.EX9.6.320)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Bruce Watts and Lydia Watts (CC.New.EX9.6.321)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Martin Cohen (CC.New.EX9.6.322)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Dr. Samira Mubareka (CC.New.EX9.6.323)
(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Anthony Castaneda (CC.New.EX9.6.324)
(September 21, 2011) E-mail from Sean Caragata (CC.New.EX9.6.325)
(September 21, 2011) E-mail from Chris Moffett (CC.New.EX9.6.326)
(September 21, 2011) E-mail from Richard Reist (CC.New.EX9.6.327)
(September 21, 2011) E-mail from Richard Reist (CC.New.EX9.6.328)
(September 21, 2011) E-mail from Sara Winnett (CC.New.EX9.6.329)
(September 21, 2011) E-mail from Pamela Ewen (CC.New.EX9.6.330)
(September 20, 2011) Petition from Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, containing the names of approximately 3,600 persons, respecting Toronto Portlands Corporation - Revitalization Opportunities in the Port Lands (CC.New.EX9.6.331)
(September 19, 2011) Petition from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30 - Toronto-Danforth, containing the names of approximately 3,700 persons, respecting Toronto Portlands Corporation - Revitalization Opportunities in the Port Lands (CC.New.EX9.6.332)

EX9.7 - Utility Cut Budget Adjustment (Item BU13.1)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
35 - Scarborough Southwest, 36 - Scarborough Southwest, 37 - Scarborough Centre, 38 - Scarborough Centre, 39 - Scarborough-Agincourt, 40 - Scarborough Agincourt, 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 43 - Scarborough East, 44 - Scarborough East

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve an increase in the 2011 Operating Budget for Transportation Services of $1.0 million gross and revenue of $1.26 million, resulting in a reduction of $0.26 million in the 2011 Approved Operating Net Budget for Transportation Services, as detailed in Table 1 in the report (July 28, 2011) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, with an offsetting adjustment in the Non-Program account, for additional Utility Cut Repair work.

Origin

(August 23, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek approval for an adjustment to the Transportation Services 2011 Operating Budget in the amount of $1.26 million in order that an additional Utility Cut Contract may be tendered and awarded for the Scarborough District in August 2011.  The work to be undertaken through this contract is fully recoverable and includes a 26% administration fee. There will be no increase to the City’s net budget.

Background Information (Committee)

(July 28, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee respecting Utility Cut Budget Adjustment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40319.pdf

EX9.8 - Amendment to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Operating Budget to Apply Section 37 Funds for a Community Benefit Project in Ward 22 (Item BU13.3)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX9.8a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the 2011 Operating Budget of the Community Partnership and Investment Program, administered by Social Development, Finance and Administration, on a one-time basis by $630,000 gross $0 net, to transfer on a one-time basis City funds received as community benefits secured under Section 37 of the Planning Act to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the Northern Secondary School playing field in Ward 22, from developments as follows:

 

a.         $500,000 (source: account 220096) from the development at 299 Roehampton Avenue; and

 

b.         $130,000 (source: account XR3026‑3700023) from the development at 150 Roehampton Avenue.

 

2.         City Council not transfer the $130,000 from account XR3026-3700023 to the Toronto District School Board until an amendment is made to Motion J(20), adopted by Council on September 25, 26, 27, and 28, 2006, to properly identify the Toronto District School Board as the recipient of the $130,000 grant rather than the Northern Secondary School Foundation.

 

3.         City Council not forward the $630,000.00 to the Toronto District School Board until one or more agreements between the City and the Toronto District School Board have been executed to address the use of the funds, the community use of the Northern Secondary School playing field, and the financial reporting requirements.

Origin

(August 23, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The report seeks authorization to amend the 2011 Operating Budget of the Community Partnership and Investment Program to apply a total of $630,000, funded through agreements made under Section 37 of the Planning Act.  The purpose of the Operating Budget amendment is to fund improvements to the Toronto District School Board’s Northern Secondary School playing field in Ward 22.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 5, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee respecting Amendment to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Operating Budget to Apply Section 37 Funds for a Community Benefit Project in Ward 22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40321.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 12, 2011) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on Amending Direction for Third Party Agreement - Northern Secondary School Playing Field (EX9.8a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40794.pdf

EX9.9 - Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget (Item BU13.4)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget as follows:

 

a.           an increase of $1,814.7 thousand gross and $0.0 net and an increase of eight temporary positions to reflect confirmed funding from various Provincial ministries and external sources; and

 

b.           an increase of $255.1 thousand gross and $0.0 net and an increase of three contracted Public Health Nurse (PHN) positions to reflect the new 100 percent base funding from the MOHLTC.  No incremental expense shall be incurred for overhead, administration or logistical support for these positions beyond the allocated amount from the province.  These positions will be eliminated immediately upon the cessation of 100% provincial funding.

 

2.         City Council delegate authority to the Medical Officer of Health to award, amend and execute on a one time basis, purchase or service contracts for the Toronto Bed Bug Initiative with appropriate community agencies, Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) and Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) as set out in Table 1 in the report (August 18, 2011) from the Medical Officer of Health.

 

3.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, to establish performance measures and report to Council, on a biannual basis, through the Board of Health, on the effectiveness and results of this bed bug control initiative.

Origin

(August 23, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The Board of Health on June 7, 2011, considered a report (May 12, 2011) from the Medical Officer of Health entitled "Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget."

Background Information (Committee)

(August 23, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee respecting Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40323.pdf

EX9.10 - Donation from The Toronto-Dominion Bank for the Franklin Children's Garden in Toronto Island Park (Item BU13.5)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council accept a donation in the amount of $250,000 from The Toronto-Dominion Bank over the three year period, 2012-2014, and to spend the donation for the purpose of refurbishing garden elements and developing educational materials and programming for the Franklin Children's Garden in Toronto Island Park.

 

2.         City Council renew the naming rights to the TD Storybook Place in the Franklin Children's Garden for the period governed by this donation, 2012-2014, contingent upon the donation being approved and received.

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into an Agreement with The Toronto-Dominion Bank  that defines the terms and conditions of  use for the donated funds at The Franklin Children's Garden, all in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(August 23, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek approval from City Council to accept a donation of $250,000 from The Toronto-Dominion Bank over a three year period, 2012-2014, to support refurbishment of garden elements and the development of educational materials and programming for the Franklin Children's Garden in Toronto Island Park. As part of accepting the donation, The Toronto-Dominion Bank would be granted a renewal of the naming rights for the TD Storybook Place within the Franklin Children's Garden for the same three year period, 2012-2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 23, 2011) Letter from the Budget Committee respecting Donation from The Toronto-Dominion Bank for the Franklin Children's Garden in Toronto Island Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40324.pdf

Speakers

Jayme Turney, Toronto Public State Initiative

EX9.13 - Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) - 2010 Annual Human Rights Unit Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that City Council receive the 2010 Annual Human Rights Unit Report attached to the letter (June 16, 2011) from the General Secretary, Toronto Transit Commission.

Origin

(June 16, 2011) Letter from the General Secretary, Toronto Transit Commission

Summary

At its meeting on Wednesday, June 8, 2011 the Commission considered the attached report entitled, “2010 Annual Human Rights Unit Report”.

 

The Commission took the following action:

 

1.      Received the report for information; and  

2.      Approved forwarding the report to City Council, for information, through the Executive Committee.  

 

The Commission’s recommendation is forwarded to Toronto City Council for information.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2011) Cover letter from the Toronto Transit Commission
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40328.pdf
(June 8, 2011) Report from the Toronto Transit Commission - 2010 Annual Human Rights Unit Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40329.pdf

EX9.16 - Acquisition of Northerly Portion of 1251 Bridletowne Circle to Create a North Scarborough Community Hub

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
40 - Scarborough Agincourt
Attention
The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX9.16a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City to enter into an Offer to Sell with the Toronto District School Board to acquire approximately 5.2 acres of the northerly portion of the property municipally known as 1251 Bridletowne Circle at a purchase price of $5,742,000 plus applicable taxes and registration fees, estimated at $200,000.00 substantially on the terms outlined in Appendix "A" of the report (September 1, 2011) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council direct that the 2011 Approved Capital Budget for Real Estate Services be increased by $5.942 million gross, $0 net, funded from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF) (XR-1012) for the acquisition of the Property.

 

3.         City Council severally authorize the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services, to execute the Offer to Sell on behalf of the City.

 

4.        City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to (i) declare the Property as surplus to the City's needs, and (ii) take all necessary steps to comply with the City's real estate disposal process, as set out in Chapter 213 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Manager or his designate to negotiate and to execute on behalf of the City a servicing agreement and ancillary documentation (the Servicing Agreement) with the YMCA of Greater Toronto for the operation of the facility based substantially on the terms and conditions sent out in Appendix "C" of the report (September 1, 2011) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and on other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the City Manager, in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

6.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer and/or Director of Real Estate Services to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City an agreement to transfer the Property to the YMCA, for no consideration, as a grant and ancillary documentation (The Grant Agreement) on execution of the Servicing Agreement, based substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix "D" of the report (September 1, 2011) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and on other terms and conditions deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer and/or Director of Real Estate Services, in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions contemplated in the Offer to Sell (as set out in Recommendation 1 above), Servicing Agreement (as set out in Recommendation 5 above) and Grant Agreement (as set out in Recommendation 6 above) on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.

 

8.         City Council confirm that the transaction contemplated by the Grant Agreement as set out in Recommendation 6 above is for the purposes of a community hub for the Steeles-L'Amoreaux neighbourhood, and deem this to be in the interest of the City of Toronto.

 

9.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee requested the City Manager to report directly to Council on what terms and conditions will be in the Major Terms and Conditions of the Grant Agreement between the City of Toronto and the Y.M.C.A. to ensure that the Agency Rental Space and the Community Hub remain available for these agencies after the initial 20 year period at occupancy costs that will permit their continued used of this space.

Origin

(September 1, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to acquire the northerly portion of 1251 Bridletowne Circle (the Property) from the Toronto Lands Corporation (TLC) for the development of a multi-service community hub in the underserved neighbourhood of Steeles-L'Amoreaux in northern Scarborough. The subject Property is to the north of the Timothy Eaton Business and Technical Institute which the Toronto District School Board declared surplus to its needs in August 2010.

 

This report recommends that the City acquire 5.22 acres of land as part of a Public Sector-Community Sector Initiative between the City of Toronto, the YMCA of Greater Toronto (YMCA) and United Way Toronto. The City would then declare the Property surplus transfers the land to the YMCA as a grant to purpose-build an approximate 100,000 square foot multi-service facility that will house (1) the YMCA (2) rental space for community-based agencies that provide social services (Agency Rental Space), and (3) rental space to The Scarborough Hospital for health services. The YMCA will construct, own, and operate this new facility. In exchange for the land, as property owner and project manager for the new facility, the YMCA will direct $2 million (approximately one-third of the land value) towards construction of the Agency Rental Space.  The YMCA will recover this amount in rent from The Scarborough Hospital for the portion of the land the Hospital will occupy. As part of their Community Hub Strategy, United Way Toronto will contribute an additional $3 million towards the construction of the Agency Rental Space pending the United Way's final internal review and approval.

 

As the landlord, the YMCA will ensure that the the Agency Rental Space is available for 20 years. The square footage and build out of the Agency Rental Space will commensurate with the value of the City and United Way's combined contributions.

 

This new Public Sector-Community Sector collaboration will result in the creation of a large new community infrastructure in Scarborough. The cost of the Property is $5.942 million which was previously approved by City Council. Having the YMCA act as the project lead eliminates construction and operating costs for the City. 

Background Information (Committee)

(September 1, 2011) Staff Report - Acquisition of Northerly Portion of 1251 Bridletowne Circle to Create a North Scarborough Community Hub
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40476.pdf
Appendix “A” Major Terms & Conditions - TLC & City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40477.pdf
Appendix “B” Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40478.pdf
Appendix “C” Major Terms & Conditions - Servicing Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40479.pdf
Appendix “D” Major Terms & Conditions - Grant Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40480.pdf
Appendix “E” Service Provider List
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-40481.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 15, 2011) Supplementary report from the City Manager on the acquisition of the northerly portion of 1251 Bridletowne Circle to create a North Scarborough Community Hub (EX9.16a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41051.pdf
(September 15, 2011) Appendix C - revised Major Terms and Conditions in the Servicing Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41052.pdf

Speakers

Miroslav Glavic

Communications (Committee)

(August 22, 2011) Letter from Councillor Kelly regarding Multi-service Community Hub in Steeles-L'Amoreaux Neighbourhood (EX.Supp.EX9.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/comm/communicationfile-24604.pdf

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 4

CA4.5 - Sign Variance Committee Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for the Sign Variance Committee

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to undertake an advertised recruitment process for the Sign Variance Committee.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Civic Appointments Committee recessed its public session and met in closed session to consider confidential information on this Item as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Sign Variance Committee.

Summary

City Council, on May 11 and 12, 2010, recommended to the incoming City Council that it consider waiving the recruitment provisions in the Public Appointments Policy in order to re-appoint members of the Sign Variance Committee at the pleasure of Council for an additional term ending November 30, 2014 and until their successors are appointed, and to identify those candidates previously identified as alternates to be considered by the Civic Appointments Committee if a vacancy occurs.

 

(Confidential information pertaining to the incumbents and identified alternates are distributed under confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.  Members of Council are able to view the confidential information in the City Clerk's Office, Toronto City Hall.)

Background Information (Committee)

(July 19, 2011) Letter from the City Clerk - May 11 & 12, 2010 City Council Decision
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-39611.pdf

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 6

CA6.1 - Toronto Police Services Board - Appointment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Police Services Board.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the candidate listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Police Services Board, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until a successor is appointed.

  

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointee's name public once appointed by Council and the appointee has been notified.

 

3.         City Council identify the candidate listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as an alternate for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment should a vacancy occur during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the name of the candidate identified as an alternate remain confidential until appointed as a member, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Civic Appointments Committee recessed its public session and met in closed session on August 2, 2011, to consider confidential information on this Item related to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Police Services Board.

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will interview candidates for appointment to the Toronto Police Services Board.

 

(Copies of the confidential applications were previously distributed under confidential cover to the Members of the Civic Appointments Committee.)

CA6.2 - Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the candidate listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors, at the pleasure of Council, for a three year term effective December 4, 2011 and until a successor is appointed.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointee's name public once appointed by Council and the appointee has been notified.

 

3.         City Council identify the candidate listed in Confidential Attachment 2 an alternate for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment should a vacancy occur during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the name of the candidate identified as an alternate remain confidential until appointed as a member, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Civic Appointments Committee recessed its public session and met in closed session on August 2, 2011, to consider confidential information on this Item related to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors.

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will interview candidates for appointment to the Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors.

 

(Copies of the confidential applications were previously distributed under confidential cover to the Members of the Civic Appointments Committee.)

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 8

CA8.4 - Potential Code of Conduct Violation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Integrity Commissioner to investigate the circumstances of an alleged breach of confidentiality at the Executive Committee meeting held on July 28 and 29, 2011 with respect to the short listing of candidates by the Civic Appointments Committee.

Summary

Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti is recommending that Council ask the Integrity Commissioner to investigate the circumstances of an alleged breach of confidentiality at the July 28 and 29, 2011 Executive Committee meeting with respect to shortlisting of candidates by the Civic Appointments Committee.

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 9

CA9.1 - Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Exhibition Place Board of Governors.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Exhibition Place Board of Governors, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

 

3.         City Council identify the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternates for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment, in the order listed, should a vacancy occur during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the names of the candidates identified as alternates remain confidential until appointed as members, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Summary

Civic Appointments Committee Panel 1 submits its recommendations on appointments to the Exhibition Place Board of Governors.

 

(Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 will be forwarded under separate Confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.)

CA9.2 - Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the individual listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until a successor is appointed.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointee's name public once appointed by Council and the appointee has been notified.

 

2.         City Council identify the candidate listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as an alternate to be considered by the Civic Appointments Committee if a vacancy occurs during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the name of the candidate identified as an alternate remain confidential until appointed as a member, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Summary

Civic Appointments Committee Panel 1 submits its recommendation on appointment to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee.

 

(Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 will be forwarded under separate Confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.)

CA9.3 - Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

 

3.         City Council identify the candidate listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as an alternate for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider should a vacancy occur during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the name of the candidate identified as an alternate remain confidential until appointed as a member, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Summary

Civic Appointments Committee Panel 1 submits its recommendations on appointments to the Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee.

 

(Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 will be forwarded under separate Confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.)

CA9.4 - Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Corporation Board of Directors, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on December 31, 2012, renewable without further recruitment for a term ending on November 30, 2014, and until successors are appointed, under Council’s Public Appointments Policy and the Metropolitan Toronto Convention Centre Corporation Act.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

 

3.         City Council identify the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternates for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment, in the order listed, if a vacancy occurs during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the names of the candidates identified as alternates remain confidential until appointed as members, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Summary

Civic Appointments Committee Panel 1 submits its recommendations on appointments to the Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors.

 

(Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 will be forwarded under separate Confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.)

CA9.5 - Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed.

 

2.         City Council appoint the candidate noted in Confidential Attachment 1 as Chair.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

 

4.         City Council identify the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternates for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment, in the order listed, should a vacancy occur during the term.

  

5.         City Council direct that the names of the candidates identified as alternates remain confidential until appointed as a member, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Summary

Civic Appointments Committee Panel 1 submits its recommendations on appointments to the Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors.

 

(Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 will be forwarded under separate Confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.)

CA9.6 - Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Public Library Board.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Public Library Board, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed, under the Public Libraries Act and Council’s Public Appointments Policy.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

 

3.         City Council identify the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternates for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment, in the order listed, if a vacancy occurs during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the names of the candidates identified as alternates remain confidential until appointed as members, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Summary

Civic Appointments Committee Panel 3 submits its recommendations on appointments to the Toronto Public Library Board.

 

(Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 will be forwarded under separate Confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.)

CA9.7 - Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments


The Civic Appointments Committee has submitted a transmittal on this Item (CA9.7a with recommendations)

Communication CA9.7.1 has been submitted on this Item

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Zoo Board of Management.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Zoo Board of Management, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed.

 

2.         City Council appoint the candidate noted in Confidential Attachment 1 as Chair.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

 

4.         City Council identify the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternates for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment, in the order listed, should a vacancy occur during the term.

 

5.         City Council direct that the names of the candidates identified as alternates remain confidential until appointed as members, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Civic Appointments Committee recessed its public session and met in closed session to consider confidential information on this Item as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Zoo Board of Management.

Summary

Civic Appointments Committee Panel 3 submits its recommendations on appointments to the Toronto Zoo Board of Management.

 

(Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 will be forwarded under separate Confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.)

Background Information (City Council)

(September 16, 2011) transmittal from the Civic Appointments Committee on appointments to the Toronto Zoo Board of Management (CA9.7a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41053.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 21, 2011) E-mail from Miguel Avila, Citizens Advisory Committee for the Toronto Zoo (CC.Main.CA9.7.1)

CA9.8 - Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
City Council will consider the following Items from the Civic Appointments Committee together
CA4.5 Sign Variance Committee Appointments
CA6.1 Toronto Police Services Board - Appointments
CA6.2 Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.1 Exhibition Place Board of Governors - Appointments
CA9.2 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Consultative Committee - Appointments
CA9.3 Greater Toronto Airports Authority Community Environment and Noise Advisory Committee - Appointments
CA9.4 Metro Toronto Convention Centre Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.5 Toronto Parking Authority Board of Directors - Appointments
CA9.6 Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments
CA9.7 Toronto Zoo Board of Management - Appointments
CA9.8 Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors – Appointments

The Civic Appointments Committee has submitted a transmittal on this Item (CA9.8a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors.

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

Summary

Civic Appointments Committee Panel 3 submits its recommendations on appointments to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors.

 

(Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 will be forwarded under separate Confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee only.)

Background Information (City Council)

(September 16, 2011) transmittal from the Civic Appointments Committee on appointments to the Toronto Atmospheric Fund Board of Directors (CA9.8a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41054.pdf

Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 7

CD7.3 - Identify 'N Impact Investment Program 2011 Allocation Recommendations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration has submitted a supplementary report on Item CD7.4. This supplementary report contains recommendations on the Identify 'N Impact Investment Program. See CD7.4a

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2011 Identify 'N Impact allocations totalling $156,934.00 to 16 organizations as recommended in Appendices 1 and 2, and that an amount of $14,826.00 be held for appeals.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee:

 

1.         Referred this report to the September 15, 2011 CPIP Appeals Committee meeting for the hearing of appeals and a report directly to City Council.

Origin

(August 19, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Development

Summary

This report recommends allocations for funding under the 2011 Identify 'N Impact Investment Program. Of the 60 applications received, 16 are recommended for funding of $156,934.00. An amount of $14,826.00 has been held for appeals.

 

The Identify 'N Impact (INI) Investment Program supports projects that are planned, managed and delivered by youth for youth, particularly African-Canadian and racialized youth and youth in underserved neighbourhoods across the city. Funding supports activities that engage youth in opportunities to build their skills and deliver that focus on entrepreneurship, employment skills/job readiness, leadership, arts, social/recreation, education and peer mentoring. The program operates with a youth panel that provides the City with expertise on youth priorities and engagement approaches.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 19, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on the Identify 'N Impact Investment Program 2011 Allocation Recommendations including Appendix 1 - Identify 'N Impact Investment Fund 2011 Funding Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-40243.pdf
(August 19, 2011) Appendix 2 - Identify 'N Impact - Detailed Project Summaries
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-40244.pdf

CD7.4 - 2011 Community Partnership Investment Program Appeals Committee Process

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CD7.4a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider the recommendations of the CPIP Appeals Committee and approve the appeals allocations for the:

 

a.         Access Equity and Human Rights Program;

 

b.         Community Festivals and Special Events Program;

 

c.         Community Safety Investment Program;

 

d.         Community Recreation Investment Program;

 

e.         Community Service Partnerships Program; and

 

f.          Identify 'N Impact Investment Program.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee:

 

1.         Requested that the CPIP Appeals Committee to report directly to Council for its meeting on September 21 and 22, 2011, with recommended allocations for the appeal funds for:

 

a.         Access Equity and Human Rights Program;

 

b.         Community Festivals and Special Events Program; and

 

c.         Community Safety Investment Program;

 

d.         Community Recreation Investment Program;

 

e.         Community Service Partnerships Program; and

 

f.          Identify and Impact Investment Program.

Origin

(August 18, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report recommends that the Community Development and Recreation Committee request the Community Partnership Investment Program (CPIP) Appeals Committee to report directly to Council following its September 15 2011 meeting with recommended allocations for the CPIP program appeal funds.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 18, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on the 2011 CPIP Appeals Committee Process
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-40042.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(September 19, 2011) supplementary report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on CPIP 2011 Appeals, including Appendices 1(a) to 1(f) - Appeal Recommendations (CD7.4a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41056.pdf
(September 19, 2011) Appendices 2(a) to 2(f) - Revised Summary Sheets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41057.pdf

Economic Development Committee - Meeting 7

ED7.5 - Financial District Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Poll Results

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
20 - Trinity-Spadina, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 1133 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate, based on the poll results respecting the intention to designate the Financial District Business Improvement Area, the area described by Attachment No. 1 to the report (August 23, 2011) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the Financial District Business Improvement Area (BIA), under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment No. 1 to the report (August 23, 2011) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as a Business Improvement Area.

 

3.         City Council approve those amendments necessary to Schedule "A" of Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, to include the Financial District Business Improvement Area.

Origin

(August 23, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that the Financial District be designated as a Business Improvement Area (BIA).

 

In accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code ("Chapter 19"), the City Clerk conducted a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to designate the Financial District as a BIA.  The Notice of Intention to Designate the BIA was mailed-out prior to Council's July 12, 2011, approval of several amendments to Chapter 19, and therefore, the polling benchmarks in effect prior to July 12, 2011, apply.

 

The number of objecting petitions does not meet the sufficiency benchmark set out in Chapter 19-9A of the Municipal Code.  Accordingly, City Council may establish a Business Improvement Area.  Based upon the results, it is recommended that City Council pass a by-law to designate the area described by the map in Attachment No. 1 as the Financial District BIA.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 23, 2011) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, on Financial District Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Poll Results
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-40451.pdf

ED7.6 - Business Improvement Area (BIA) Boards of Management - Additions and Deletions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport, 22 - St. Paul's, 25 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 1134 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.               City Council approve the additions and the deletions to the Oakwood Village and Uptown Yonge BIA Boards of Management as set out in Attachment No. 1 to the report dated August 26, 2011 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

 

2.         City Council confirm that under Council's Public Appointments Policy, these Board members are appointed at the pleasure of Council, and Council retains the right to replace any appointed member at any time and for any reason.

 

3.                City Council direct that Schedule A of the Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, be amended to reflect the changes in the number of members and the number of members required for quorum of each of the BIA Boards of Management.

Origin

(August 26, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend City Council approve the additions and the deletions from the Oakwood Village and Uptown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA) Boards of Management.  City Council has delegated authority to make final decisions regarding BIA appointments.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 26, 2011) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, on Business Improvement Area (BIA) Boards of Management - Additions and Deletions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-40428.pdf

ED7.7 - Gerrard India Bazaar Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Boundary Expansion Poll Results

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Bills 1123 and 1124 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate, based on the poll results respecting the intention to expand the Gerrard India Bazaar Business Improvement Area (BIA), the area described by Attachment No. 1 to the report (August 16, 2011) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the expanded Gerrard India Bazaar Business Improvement Area (BIA) under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment No. 1 to the report (August 16, 2011) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as a Business Improvement Area (BIA).

 

3.         City Council approve those amendments necessary to Schedule "A" of Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, to include the expanded Gerrard India Bazaar Business Improvement Area (BIA).

Origin

(August 16, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the expansion of the Gerrard India Bazaar Business Improvement Area (BIA) boundaries.

 

In accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code ("Chapter 19"), the City Clerk conducted a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to expand the boundaries of the Gerrard India Bazaar BIA.  The expansion process was initiated in 2009 and the poll was mailed-out prior to Council's July 12, 2011, approval of several amendments to Chapter 19, and therefore, the polling benchmarks in effect prior to July 12, 2011, apply.

 

The number of objecting petitions does not meet the sufficiency benchmark set out in Chapter 19-9B of the Municipal Code.  Accordingly, City Council may expand the boundaries of the Business Improvement Area.  Based upon the results, it is recommended that Council pass a by-law to designate the area described by the map in Attachment No. 1, as the expanded Gerrard India Bazaar BIA.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 16, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, on Gerrard India Bazaar Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Boundary Expansion Poll Results
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-40433.pdf
(August 16, 2011) Attachment 1 - Map of Proposed Gerrard India Bazaar BIA Expansion
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-40434.pdf

Government Management Committee - Meeting 7

GM7.1 - Apportionment of Property Taxes - September 15, 2011 Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the apportionment of property taxes in the amounts identified in Appendix A and Appendix B in the report (August 22, 2011) from the Treasurer, under the columns entitled "Apportioned Tax" and "Apportioned Phase In/Capping.", excluding the following applications:

 

Taypayers Initiated Applications - Appendix B:

 

Page No.    Page

No.

Ward No.

Tax Year

Original Roll No.

Total Taxes

to be Apportioned

Tax Roll No. for Apportioned Properties

Reason for Adjournment

7 of 13

22

2010

1904-05-4-280-02502

(110 Poplar Plains Rd)

$11,183.94

1904-05-4-280-02503

1904-05-4-280-02506

Application Under Review

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1904-05-4-280-02504

(108 Poplar Plains Rd)

$9,967.00

1904-05-4-280-02503

1904-05-4-280-02506

Application Under Review

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13 of 13

22

2011

1904-05-4-280-02502

(110 Poplar Plains Rd)

$11,154.50

1904-05-4-280-02503

1904-05-4-280-02506

Application Under Review

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1904-05-4-280-02504

(108 Poplar Plains Rd)

$9,935.30

1904-05-4-280-02503

1904-05-4-280-02506

Application Under Review

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(August 22, 2011) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

The process of redistributing outstanding property taxes from one parcel of land to many newly created properties following a severance or re-development of land is referred to as "the apportionment of taxes".

 

This report deals with 15 tax apportionment applications made by the Treasurer or to the Treasurer by an owner of land pursuant to section 322 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the properties listed in Appendices A and B (attached). 

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting at which the applicants and / or property owners may make representations.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.

 

Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 22, 2011) Staff Report - Apportionment of Property Taxes - September 15, 2011 Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40416.pdf
(August 22, 2011) Appendix A - Apportionment Report - Treasurer Initiated Tax apportionments (August 11, 2011)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40417.pdf
(August 22, 2011) Appendix B - Apportionment Report - Taxpayer Intiated Tax Apportionments (August 11, 2011)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40418.pdf

GM7.2 - Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes -September 15, 2011 Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.          the individual appeals pursuant to Section 323 & 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as provided in the Detailed Hearing Reports marked as Appendix A & Appendix B attached to the report dated August 22, 2011 from the Treasurer, be approved excluding the following applications:

 

Section 323 -Appendix A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ward

Number

Appeal 

Number

Tax Year

Assessment Roll 

Number

Property

Location

Reason for 

Adjournment

Tax Adjustment

1

20110084

2009

1919 044 382 00460

101 Westmore Dr 110

Application under review

-$1,098.91

1

20110083

2009

1919 044 382 00460

101 Westmore Dr 110

Application under review

-$5,221.93

1

201100418

2011

1919 044 382 00460

101 Westmore Dr 110

Application under review

-$7,976.35

1

20110086

2010

1919 044 382 00460

101 Westmore Dr 110

Application under review

-$1,390.38

1

20110087

2010

1919 044 382 00460

101 Westmore Dr 110

Application under review

-$6,625.11

5

201100130

2010

1919 032 320 02100

86 Charleston Rd

Application under review

-$0.00

19

2010-00661

2010

1904 044 340 01300

701 Dovercourt Rd

Application under review

-$0.00

20

201100118

2010

1904 052 130 01600

43 Madison Ave

Application under review

-$0.00

20

201100616

2011

1904 062 066 04074

361 Front St W 510

Application under review

-$148.67

22

201100108

2010

1904 103 550 02000

347 Hillsdale Ave E

Application under review

-$425.61

22

201100311

2010

1904 103 330 00100

19 Belcourt Rd

Application under review

-$158.09

23

201100106

2010

1908 093 220 04000

112 Estelle Ave

Application under review

-$765.37

25

201100425

2011

1908 101 360 09900

19 Burdock Lane

Application under review

-$559.01

25

201100233

2010

1908 102 310 00400

8 Norden Cres

Application under review

-$95.51

29

201100376

2010

1908 084 510 04100

920 Carlaw Ave

Application under review

-$241.52

32

201100681

2011

1904 092 080 00600

84 Kingston Rd

Application under review

-$0.00

32

2010001058

2010

1904 092 080 00600

84 Kingston Rd

Application under review

-$0.00

39

201100236

2010

1901 111 210 00400

4072 Sheppard Ave E

Application under review

-$0.00

42

201100175

2009

1901 121 387 05000

1530 Markham Rd

Application under review

-$99,533.84

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

-$124,240.30 

 

Section 325 -Appendix B

'

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ward

Number

Appeal 

Number

Tax Year

Assessment Roll 

Number

Property

Location

Reason for 

Adjournment

Tax Adjustment

23

201100105

2009

1908 093 220 04000

112 Estelle Ave

Application under review

-$719.95

25

201100232

2009

1908 102 310 00400

8 Norden Cres 

Application under review

-$49.15

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

TOTAL

-$769.10 

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(August 22, 2011) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report deals with tax appeal applications made to the Treasurer pursuant to sections 323 and 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA).  Section 323 permits Council to cancel, reduce or refund taxes in cases when, during the year, a property undergoes changes such as when it is destroyed by fire or demolished, becomes exempt from taxation, or is reclassified due to a change in use.  Under section 325 of the COTA, taxpayers can request a cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes when an error in the assessment roll is identified which results in an overcharge.

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting where applicants may make a submission in defence of their position.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.

 

Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 22, 2011) Staff Report - Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - September 15, 2011 Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40413.pdf
(August 22, 2011) Appendix A - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 323 of COTA
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40414.pdf
(August 22, 2011) Appendix B - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 325 of COTA
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40415.pdf

GM7.3 - Largest Property Tax Debtors with Tax Arrears Greater than $500,000 as at June 30, 2011

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that City Council receive the item for information.

Origin

(September 1, 2011) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

To provide information on property tax accounts with outstanding receivables of $500,000 or more as at June 30, 2011.  This report contains one attachment - Attachment 1 lists properties with tax arrears of $500,000 or more.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 1, 2011) Staff Report - Largest Property Tax Debtors with Tax Arrears Greater than $500,000 as at June 30, 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40561.pdf
Attachment 1- Properties with Tax Arrears Greater than $500,000 as at June 30, 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40562.pdf

GM7.5 - Declaration as Surplus - Untravelled Public Highways on Plan of Subdivision M-1859, Mockingbird Crescent, Jacobs Gate and the One Foot Reserve North of Mockingbird Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council declare surplus portions of the untravelled public highways Mockingbird Crescent and Jacobs Gate on Plan M-1859, City of Toronto shown as Parts 2 and 3 on Sketch No. PS-2010-070, attached as Appendix "A" (collectively the “Highways”), in the report (June 13, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and the one foot reserve north of Mockingbird Crescent, being Block Y on Plan M-1859, City of Toronto, shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2010-070 (the “Reserve”), conditional upon City Council approving an application to the Court pursuant to the Land Titles Act, to permanently close the Highways and authority be granted for staff to negotiate the terms of an agreement with Sanofi Pasteur Limited (“Sanofi”), for recommendation to City Council, pursuant to which the City would agree to apply to the Court to cancel the portion of the Plan M-1859 west of Hidden Trail, permanently close the Highways and vest title to the Highways and the Reserve in Sanofi.

 

2.         City Council authorize that all steps necessary to comply with the City’s real estate disposal process as set out in Chapter 213 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, be taken.

Origin

(June 13, 2011) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to declare surplus portions of the untravelled public highways on Plan of Subdivision M-1859, known as Mockingbird Crescent and Jacobs Gate and the one foot reserve north of Mockingbird Crescent, conditional upon City Council approving an application to the Court to permanently close these untravelled public highways, and to authorize negotiations with the adjoining property owner, Sanofi Pasteur Limited, for the submission of an application to the Court to cancel part of Plan M-1859, permanently close the untravelled public highways located thereon and vest title to portions of the closed highways and the one foot reserve in Sanofi Pasteur Limited.

 

Authority to declare property surplus has been delegated to the Chief Corporate Officer, unless the local Councillor requires the matter to be determined by City Council, which is the case in this instance.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2011) Staff Report - Declaration as Surplus Untravelled Public Highways on Plan of Subdivision M-1859, Mockingbird Crescent, Jacobs Gate and the One Foot Reserve North of Mockingbird Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-39398.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(September 14, 2011) Letter from J. Mark Lievonen, President, Sanofi Pasteur (GM.New.GM7.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/comm/communicationfile-24719.pdf
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from Shelley Stillman, Secretary (GM.New.GM7.5.2)
(September 15, 2011) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson, Ward 37 - Scarborough Centre (GM.New.GM7.5.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/comm/communicationfile-24721.pdf

GM7.7 - City-Sponsored Pre-OMERS Pension Plans - Analysis of Alternative Investment and Pension Administration through OMERS

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief General Manager of the Toronto Transit Commission and the Board of Directors of the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society to work co-operatively with OMERS staff, to release all data and information (including but not limited to actuarial data) required by OMERS to perform an evaluation of all options and services available by OMERS to the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society with respect to both its registered and non-registered pension benefits.

 

2.         City Council request OMERS and the Chief General Manager of the Toronto Transit Commission to report to the January 24, 2012, meeting of the Government Management Committee with detailed results of their evaluation (as per Government Management Committee Work Plan) with recommendations for next steps.

 

3.         City Council, in the event that the Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society Board of Directors decides again it will not provide the information to Council as requested, request that it provide a written explanation, directly from the Board of Directors, (both TTC Commission appointees and ATU appointees) outlining the reasons why an agreement was not reached.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee referred the report (August 31, 2011) from the Treasurer (GM7.7c) to the Executive Committee for consideration.

Origin

(September 15, 2011) Letter from Councillor Paul Ainslie, Ward 43 - Scarborough East

Summary

Letter from Councillor Paul Ainslie (September 15, 2011) pertaining to the City-Sponsored Pre-OMERS Pension Plans – Analysis of Alternative Investment and Pension Administration through OMERS.

 

Background Information (Committee)

(September 15, 2011) Letter from Council Paul Ainslie, Ward 43 - Scarborough East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40850.pdf

7a - Analysis of Options - Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society and Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS)

Origin
(September 8, 2011) Letter from the Chief General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission
Summary

Letter forwarding the report from the Toronto Transit Commission, as requested, summarizing the outcome of a preliminary analysis of 3 options with respect to the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS).

Background Information (Committee)
(September 8, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Transit Commission
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40745.pdf
Attachment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40746.pdf

7b - Preliminary Analysis of Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) Options - Toronto Transit Commission Pension Fund Society

Origin
(September 12, 2011) Letter from the Director, Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS)
Summary

Letter from the Director of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) respecting the preliminary analysis and related work prepared by OMERS Administration Corporation in accordance with the Government Management Committee Recommendations:  GM3.9 - "City Sponsored Pre-OMERS Pension Plans and the Toronto Transity Commission Pension Fund Society", and adopted by City Council at its meeting of May 17-19, 2011.

Background Information (Committee)
(September 12, 2011) Letter from the Director, Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40750.pdf
(August 25, 2011) Letter addressed to the Chief General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission, from the Director of the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40751.pdf
Attachment - Preliminary Analysis of OMERS Options TTC Pension Fund Society
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40752.pdf

7c - City-Sponsored Pre-OMERS Pension Plans - Analysis of Alternative Investment and Pension Administration through OMERS

Origin
(August 31, 2011) Report from the Treasurer
Summary

This report summarizes the outcome of a preliminary analysis of options with respect to the Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement System (OMERS) providing alternative management and/or pension administration services for the City's five Pre-OMERS Pension Plans.  Based on the analysis of the options, the report recommends that staff be authorized to enter into discussions with OMERS and other appropriate parties regarding the terms of a potential merger of the City's five (5) Pre-OMERS pension plans into OMERS;  to evaluate the option of winding-up the five (5) Pre-OMERS pension plans; and to report back to Government Management Committee once all the necessary provincial regulations are in place and proposed terms and conditions of a potential merger have been negotiated.

Background Information (Committee)
(August 31, 2011) Staff Report - City-Sponsored Pre-OMERS Pension Plans - Analysis of Alternative Investment and Pension Administration through OMERS
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40566.pdf
Attachment 1 - Preliminary Analysis of OMERS Options - City of Toronto Pre-OMERS Pension Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40567.pdf
Attachment 2 - Merger Work Plan - City of Toronto and OMERS
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40568.pdf

GM7.8 - Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Toronto and Zylog Systems (Canada) Ltd. for TalentFlow Software

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee forwards this item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(August 30, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Human Resources, General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services (TESS) and Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division

Summary

TalentFlow software is currently used by the City's Human Resources Division and Toronto Employment & Social Services (TESS) Division to provide an e-Recruitment system that streamlines and simplifies the City’s recruitment processes. TalentFlow ensures City employees and the public have access to job opportunities with the Toronto Public Service. TalentFlow also facilitates and automates recruitment processes for community employers who partner with TESS to provide employment opportunities and programs for the unemployed or underemployed residents of Toronto.  The purpose of this report is to request authority to amend and extend the existing agreement from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014 with Zylog Systems (Canada) Ltd. (Zylog) to provide for additional customization requirements and for on-going annual maintenance and hosting fees for the TalentFlow System for a total increased amount not to exceed $887,500.00 net of all taxes.

 

Zylog is the single source (see explanation on page 5) for TalentFlow Systems and has sole access to the proprietary intellectual property (source code) which is essential for the provision of further customization requirements, for on-going annual maintenance and for technical support for this system.  There is no other vendor or reseller that can perform these services on the TalentFlow software.  The disadvantages and risks associated with pursuing an RFP to acquire a new vendor to provide maintenance, hosting, technical support and customizations are detailed in the Issue Background section of this report.

 

TalentFlow was acquired by the Human Resources Division through Request for Quotation (RFQ) 3405-06-3448 in 2006, and was the low bid meeting specification as a result of the competitive process. The pricing offered by Zylog for the additional customizations and ongoing annual maintenance and support is reduced to levels at or below the original pricing submitted in the RFQ, and is fair and reasonable. In July 2011, independent technology research consultants, Gartner, Inc., provided specific market analysis to the City confirming that Zylog's pricing for the City for TalentFlow is competitive and in the low end of the market range for the provision of similar services to organizations of comparable size and scope. Further, the existing legal Agreement between Zylog and TESS binds Zylog to provide the City with discounted rates for their licensing, hosting and customization services for up to four (4) further years at the discretion of the City ending December 31, 2014.

 

Zylog has not increased its maintenance or hosting fees to the City since 2007 and in fact provided a further discounted price to the City when TESS contracted with Zylog for its use of TalentFlow in 2010.  Zylog has demonstrated their commitment to ensure that costs to the City for TalentFlow (use, hosting, customization and support) are reduced to levels at or below the original pricing submitted in the RFQ, and that these costs are fair and reasonable and representative of the required work.

 

This amendment to the Agreement with Zylog requires Council approval since the total contract period exceeds five (5) years in length. The recommendations are in accordance with the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71 – Financial Control, Section 71-11.1 (proposed commitment costs exceed the original funding by more than $500,000.00 excluding all taxes).

Background Information (Committee)

(August 30, 2011) Staff Report - Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Toronto and Zylog Systems (Canada) Ltd. for Talent Flow Software
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40436.pdf
(June 14, 2011) Staff Report - Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Toronto and Zylog Systems (Canada) ltd. for Talent Flow Software (Deferred from June 28, 2011 - 2011.GM5.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40555.pdf

8a - Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Toronto and Zylog Systems (Canada) Ltd. for TalentFlow Software

Origin
(June 14, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Human Resources, the Acting General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services (TESS) and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division
Summary

TalentFlow software is currently used by the City's Human Resources Division and Toronto Employment & Social Services (TESS) Division to provide an e-Recruitment system to streamline and simplify the City’s recruitment processes. TalentFlow ensures City employees and the public are aware of job opportunities with the Toronto Public Service. TalentFlow also facilitates and automates recruitment processes for community employers who partner with TESS to provide employment opportunities and programs for the unemployed or underemployed residents of Toronto.  The purpose of this report is to request authority to amend and extend the existing agreement with Zylog Systems (Canada) Ltd. (Zylog) to provide for additional customization requirements and for on-going annual maintenance and hosting fees for the TalentFlow system in a total amount not to exceed $1,254,500.00, net of all taxes.  Further this report requests to extend the term of the agreement from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2015.

 

Zylog is the single source for TalentFlow Systems and has sole access to the proprietary intellectual property (source code) which is essential for the provision of further customization requirements, for on-going annual maintenance and for technical support for this system.  There is no other vendor or reseller that can perform these services on the TalentFlow software.  The disadvantages and risks associated with pursuing an RFP to acquire a new vendor to provide maintenance, hosting, technical support and customizations are detailed in the Issue Background section of this report.

 

TalentFlow was acquired by the Human Resources Division through Request for Quotation (RFQ) 3405-06-3448 in 2006, and was the low bid meeting specification as a result of the competitive process. The proposed pricing is reduced to levels at or below the original pricing submitted in the RFQ, and is fair and reasonable. TalentFlow pricing was compared and was shown to be competitive, particularly in light of its advantages and superior functionality. Further, the existing Agreement between Zylog and TESS binds Zylog to provide the City with discounted rates for their licensing, hosting and customization services for up to four (4) further years at the discretion of the City.

 

Zylog has not increased its maintenance and hosting fees to the City since 2007 and in fact provided a further discounted price to the City when TESS contracted with Zylog for its use of TalentFlow in 2010.  Zylog has demonstrated their commitment to ensure that costs to the City for TalentFlow (use, hosting, customization and support) are reduced to levels at or below the original pricing submitted in the RFQ, and that these costs are fair and reasonable and representative of the required work.

 

The recommendations are in accordance with the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 71 – Financial Control, Section 71-11.1 (proposed commitment costs exceed the original funding by more than $500,000.00 excluding all taxes).

Background Information (Committee)
(June 14, 2011) Staff Report - Amendment to the Agreement between the City of Toronto and Zylog Systems (Canada) Ltd. for TalentFlow Software
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40570.pdf

GM7.9 - Implementation of a Fixed Fine System for Parking Tickets

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication GM7.9.8 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the implementation of a Fixed Fine System for all parking ticket offences, other than accessible parking offences, where a parking ticket proceeding results in a conviction after a defendant in court either pleads guilty or is found guilty.

 

2.         Council approve that the Fixed Fine Amounts be set equal to the presently-established Set Fines (the dollar amount that appears on the face of the ticket), with the Fixed Fine Amounts to apply where a parking ticket proceeding results in a conviction after a defendant in court either pleads guilty or is found guilty.

 

3.         City Council request the City Solicitor prepare and present to Council the necessary amending by-laws.

 

4.         City Council request the City Solicitor make the necessary application to the Regional Senior Judge for new set fine orders.

 

5.         City Council receive the report (August 30, 2011) from the Treasurer and the City Solicitor

Origin

(June 13, 2011) Report from the Treasurer and the City Solicitor

Summary

This report recommends the introduction of a Fixed Fine system for parking offences (excluding accessible/disabled parking offences).  A fixed fine system will help to optimize the use of the City's courts by reducing the number of trials that must be scheduled for parking ticket recipients who request a trial but who do not intend to dispute the charge and hope simply to obtain a reduced fine amount, or who request a trial in hope that the issuing officer will not attend court and the charges will be withdrawn.  Making more efficient use of the available court capacity for parking tickets will in turn reduce the time to trial for parking ticket recipients who wish to have a trial.

 

A fixed fine will apply where a parking ticket recipient requests a trial, and the trial results in a conviction, (i.e., the defendant either pleads guilty or is found guilty at trial).  Fixed fine amounts would be $12.75 higher than the existing set fine amount that appears on the face of the ticket.  The fixed fine amount parallels the existing structure set out in the Provincial Offences Act that allows $12.75 in court costs to be added to a parking ticket fine where a trial has been requested and the defendant fails to appear in court.  Where a parking ticket recipient requests a trial and is found not guilty, no fine is imposed.

 

This report also recommends reducing the set fine amount for accessible parking offences (previously referred to as disabled parking offences), from $450.00 to $300.00, which is the minimum fine which the City of Toronto Act, 2006 requires for that offence.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2011) Staff Report - Implementation of a Fixed Fine System for Parking Tickets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40569.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 18, 2011) E-mail from Josef Kates (CC.Supp.GM7.9.8)

9a - Further Report on the Implementation of a Fixed Fine System for Parking Tickets

Origin
(August 30, 2011) Report from the Treasurer and the City Solicitor
Summary

This report:

 

a.         responds to the Government Management Committee's request for a more detailed range of options for dealing with parking ticket recipients who request a trial and fail to appear in court; and

 

b.         provides further information and options and revised recommendations with respect to the implementation of a Fixed Fine system for parking offences to apply in cases where a scheduled parking ticket trial results in a conviction (i.e., where the defendant either pleads guilty or is found guilty), as originally set out in a staff report dated June 13, 2011 (Item GM5.6 “Implementation of a Fixed Fine System for Parking Tickets”).

Background Information (Committee)
(August 30, 2011) Staff Report - Further Report on the Implementation of a Fixed Fine System for Parking Tickets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40464.pdf
Speakers
Josef Kates
Jeremy Hill
Communications (Committee)
(June 27, 2011) E-mail from David Mitchelson (GM.Main.GM7.9.1)
(June 28, 2011) E-mail from Presentation from Josef Kates (GM.Main.GM7.9.2)
(June 29, 2011) E-mail from James Whyte (GM.Main.GM7.9.3)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Nick Iozzo (GM.Supp.GM7.9.4)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Ken Wood (GM.Supp.GM7.9.5)
(September 11, 2011) E-mail from Josef Kates (GM.Supp.GM7.9.6)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Carole St. Laurent (GM.Supp.GM7.9.7)

Licensing and Standards Committee - Meeting 8

LS8.1 - Election Advertising on TTC Property

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1167 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Article II, Chapter 693 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit election advertising on property owned or under the control of the TTC.

 

2.         City Council direct that in accordance with Section 162-2A(3) of Chapter 162, Public Notice, and Chapter 27, Council Procedures, posting notice on the City's Public Notice website on September 9, 2011 is, due to the urgent nature of this matter, considered to be adequate public notice of the abovementioned amendment to Chapter 693, Article II, Election Signs.

Origin

(September 9, 2011) Memo from Councillor Palacio, Chair, Licensing and Standards Committee

Summary

At the request of the Chair of the TTC, Karen Stintz, the Licensing and Standards Committee at its meeting on September 9, 2011considered a memo and report that I was asked to introduce on Election Advertising on TTC Property and adopted the following recommendations:

 

1.         City Council amend Article II, Chapter 693 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code to permit election advertising on property owned or under the control of the TTC.

 

2.         City Council direct that in accordance with Section 162-2A(3) of Chapter 162, Public Notice, that publishing this item on the agenda in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 27, Council Procedures is, due to the urgent nature of this matter, considered to be adequate public notice of the abovementioned amendment to Chapter 693, Article II, Election Signs.

 

I am concerned that this item was before the Committee for deputations before the Clerk had given notice, according to Municipal Code Chapter 162, Notice, Public.  The Clerk posted notice on September 9, 2011.  Out of an abundance of caution, I as Chair of the Licensing and Standards Committee am requesting that the Committee re-open LS7.4 for consideration and deputations now that notice has been given.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 14, 2011) Memo from Councillor Cesar Palacio, Chair, Licensing and Standards Committee on Election Advertising on TTC Property (Reopening of item LS7.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-40785.pdf
(September 9, 2011) Memo from Councillor Palacio on Election Advertising on TTC Property
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-40728.pdf
(September 7, 2011) Attachment - Toronto Transit Commission Report on Election Advertising in TTC Property
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-40729.pdf

Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 7

PE7.1 - Congratulations and Thanks to Federal Government for Announcing the Creation of a Rouge Valley National Park

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PE7.1.2 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council congratulate Prime Minister Stephen Harper and his government for committing to create a National Park in the Rouge Valley area and recognizing the extraordinary ecological wealth found within the Rouge Park.

 

2.         City Council welcome the Federal Government and Parks Canada commitment to having a visible presence within the largest urban centre in Canada.

 

3.         City Council request the Mayor to send a letter of congratulations and thanks to the Prime Minister for the Rouge Valley National Park initiative.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Parks and Environment Committee:

 

1.         Referred recommendation 3 of the Member Motion (June 17, 2011) to the City Manager with a request to coordinate and prepare a report to the Parks and Environment Committee on the Rouge Park Alliance Consultants Report on Rouge Park Governance that is referred to in Recommendation 3 and that such report include an overall briefing on the City's interests in the creation of the new park.

 

"3.        City Council reconfirm its support for the findings of the Rouge Park Alliance Consultants Report on Rouge Park Governance that includes: supporting the creation of a federal park in the Rogue, supporting the inclusion of approximately 5,000 acres of federally owned land in addition to the existing designated park lands as outlined on Figure 2.11 (Area 1, 2 and 3) in the consultant's report, and supporting a formal federal role in managing the park."

Origin

(June 17, 2011) Member Motion from City Council

Summary

City Council on June 14 and 15, 2011, referred Motion MM9.2 to the Parks and Environment Committee.

 

In May 2010, the City of Toronto voted unanimously that it believes the Rouge Valley watershed is of national significance and requested that the federal and provincial governments establish a Rouge Valley National Park in order to protect the extraordinary wealth contained within the Toronto, York and Durham areas of the Park.

 

In March 2011 the Prime Minister of Canada promised that, if elected, his party would create a near urban national park in Toronto's Rouge Valley.

 

In June 2011, the Federal Government's throne speech confirmed that the Federal Government would indeed create a Rouge Valley National Park in the Rouge Valley.

 

The Rouge Park contains an extraordinary wealth of locally, provincially and nationally rare species including 225 species of birds, 55 species of fish, 19 species of amphibians, the largest concentration of native archaeological sites in the Greater Toronto Area and over 400 species of plants including rare Carolinian forests that have been identified by the World Wildlife Fund of Canada as having national importance.

 

(Submitted to City Council on June 14 and 15, 2011 as MM9.2)

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2011) Referral of Member Motion by City Council on Congratulations and Thanks to Federal Government for Announcing the Creation of a Rouge Valley National Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-39706.pdf
(April 3, 2009) Proposal for Rouge Valley National Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-40471.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 12, 2011) E-mail from Miguel Avila (PE.Main.PE7.1.1)

Communications (City Council)

(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Miguel Avila (CC.Supp.PE7.1.2)

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 7

PW7.4 - Drinking Water Licensing Program Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to retain the Walkerton Clean Water Centre to deliver the Standard of Care – Safe Drinking Water Act training session to members of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee and any other interested City Councillor for a fee of $1,356.00 including HST and charges.

Origin

(August 9, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

Summary

The purpose of this report is to update City Council on the Licensing of the City's drinking water system by Toronto Water as now required by Ontario's Safe Drinking Water Act.  The report provides specific information on the implementation of the Drinking Water Quality Management System (DWQMS) and the process to obtain Full Scope Accreditation from the Canadian General Standards Board.

 

In addition, the report informs City Council of their responsibility under the Safe Drinking Water Act, in particular, the statutory Standard of Care provision which will come into force on January 1, 2013.  Staff are also recommending to retain the Walkerton Clean Water Centre to deliver a Standard of Care training session to the members of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee and any other interested City Councillor.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 9, 2011) Report and Attachment from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Drinking Water Licensing Program Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-40067.pdf

PW7.6 - Wet Weather Flow Master Plan and Basement Flooding Protection Program Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PW7.6.13 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the prioritization of Basement Flooding Protection Program projects be consistent with the principle that the greatest number of properties are protected as soon as possible within approved funding envelopes and coordinated with other City capital programs.

 

2.         City Council direct that projects identified through completed Environmental Assessments in the 32 identified Chronic Basement Flooding Study Areas,  proceed to detailed design and construction, if the cost to benefiting property, as determined during the preliminary design phase, is less than or equal to $32,000.

 

3.         City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water to submit an updated five year list of projects, through the annual Capital Budget submission process, where Class Environmental Assessment studies have been completed, and the projects be prioritized in conformance with Recommendations 1 and 2, and where the first two years of projects will be identified for construction and the following three years of projects will be subject to confirmation for implementation through the preliminary design phases where cost estimates will be refined, and the project scheduling will be coordinated with Transportation Services and other utilities.

 

4.         City Council approve the following changes to the coordination of Transportation Services’ Program within Basement Flooding Study Areas:

 

a.         Road resurfacing and reconstruction works that are not coincident with projects on the projected five year Basement Flooding Protection Program list, may proceed in accordance with Transportation Services' standard project prioritization process; and

 

b.         Road resurfacing and reconstruction works that are coincident with projects on the projected five year list should be deferred.

 

5.         City Council direct that existing sanitary and storm sewer design criteria continue to apply to road and sewer reconstruction projects outside of currently identified basement flooding study areas, but be consistent with the Wet Weather Flow Policy adopted by Council in 2003.

 

6.         City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to finalize the Environmental Study Report for the Don River and Central Waterfront Class EA and submit it to the Ontario Ministry of the Environment for the obligatory 30 day public review period under the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process.

 

7.         City Council direct that subject to receiving approval of the Don River and Central Waterfront  Project Environmental Assessment from the Ontario Ministry of the Environment, the General Manager, Toronto Water:

 

a.         proceed to undertake the detailed design of the first phase of the Project, which represents the twinning of the Coxwell Sanitary Trunk Sewer and associated pumping station;  and

 

b.         the Chief Financial Officer report back, through the 2013 Capital Budget process, on an implementation schedule and a long term funding model for the remaining elements of the plan.

 

8.         City Council direct that the Eligibility Criteria: Financial Assistance for Low Income Property Owners previously approved under the Mandatory Downspout Disconnection Program be revised  as outlined in Attachment No. 1 including, without limitation, the following revisions:

 

a.         Eligibility limited to low-income disabled or senior citizen property owners;

 

b.         The financial assistance available limited to a maximum upset limit of $500, payable in the form of a cheque; and

 

c.         Revised conditions for financial assistance and eligible work.

 

9.         City Council authorize the General Manager of Toronto Water, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to prescribe any application form and other forms which the General Manager deems necessary to implement the financial assistance provisions set out in Recommendation 10 and to revise and amend those forms as the General Manager considers appropriate from time to time.

 

10.       City Council authorize the General Manager of Toronto Water to amend or revise the eligibility criteria with respect to low-income seniors and low-income disabled persons from time to time to reflect any future changes to the Municipal Code, Chapters 681 and 849.

 

11.       City Council authorize the discontinuance, effective 2012, of the Community Program for Stormwater Management and the funds in the amount of $250,000 be redirected to support the development and dissemination of public education and communication program to inform homeowners and contractors about:

 

a.         climate change impacts, associated with intense storms, related to basement flooding;

 

b.         the importance of downspout disconnection and “home isolation” consisting of the installation of sewer backwater valves and the capping off of storm sewer laterals with the installation of a sump pump to help prevent basement flooding;

 

c.         the importance of other lot level controls (e.g. proper lot grading); and

 

d.         the City’s Basement Flooding Protection Subsidy Program.

 

12.       City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, in collaboration with the Toronto Region Conservation Authority, to report back in 2012 on the feasibility and costs of carrying out an Environmental Assessment for a Humber Bay Islands Land Form to improve water quality at Sunnyside Beach and protect the shoreline from erosion.

 

13.       City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to examine the possibility of including additional storm water ponds or other innovative "green" solutions to storm water management as part of the Don River and Central Waterfront Project.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise Council of the progress made since the adoption of the Wet Weather Flow Master Plan (WWFMP) in 2003, to set priorities for the next five years and seek approval in principle for the Don River and Central Waterfront Project.  Subsequent to the adoption of the WWFMP, the rainstorm of August 2005 and the discovery of significant faults in the Coxwell Sanitary Trunk Sewer have profoundly influenced the implementation of the Plan.  As a result, the main funding priorities should be: improving basement flooding protection during extreme storms; twinning of the Coxwell Sanitary Trunk Sewer; elimination of combined sewer overflows; and protection of infrastructure and property from imminent collapse due to stream erosion.  All of these priorities are urgent, the solutions very complicated and each will involve several hundreds of millions of dollars to correct.

 

This report recommends that the Basement Flooding Protection Program, the Don River and Central Waterfront Project and the Stream Restoration Program be the main funding priorities for the WWFMP over the next five to ten years.  Within those programs, it also recommends a method for prioritizing basement flooding projects and coordinating those projects with the rest of the Capital construction program and recommends a technical amendment to the low income subsidy for the Downspout Disconnection Program.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 12, 2011) Report and Attachments from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Wet Weather Flow Master Planand Basement Flooding Protection Program Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-40671.pdf

Speakers

Karen Buck
Lino Grima (Submission Filed)
Michael Brothers, Toronto Chapter - Council of Canadians (Submission Filed)
Jon Gee, Manager, Great Lakes Areas of Concern, Environment Canada
Brian Denney, Chief Administrative Officer, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (Submission Filed)
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

Communications (Committee)

(September 2, 2011) Submission from Sarah Miller, Water Policy Researcher, Canadian Environmental Law Association (PW.New.PW7.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-24250.pdf
(September 5, 2011) Submission from Meirav Even-Har, Chair, Ontario Water Campaign, and Vice Chair, Board of Sierra Club Ontario (PW.New.PW7.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-24251.pdf
(September 5, 2011) E-mail from Liz Miller, Member, Toronto Chapter, Council of Canadians Water Team (PW.New.PW7.6.3)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Chris Owens (PW.New.PW7.6.4)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from John Wilson (PW.New.PW7.6.5)
(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Satya Mohapatra (PW.New.PW7.6.6)
(September 6, 2011) Submission from Brian Denney, Chief Administrative Officer, Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (PW.New.PW7.6.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-24256.pdf
(September 6, 2011) Submission from Dan McDermott, Chapter Director, Sierra Club Ontario (PW.New.PW7.6.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-24380.pdf
(September 6, 2011) Submission from Sandra Weston, Director, Great Lake Division, Environment Canada, and Richard Raeburn-Gibson, Great Lakes/COA Project Director, Ontario Ministry of the Environment (PW.New.PW7.6.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-24381.pdf
(September 7, 2011) Letter from Phil Goodwin, Chair, Don Watershed Regeneration Council (PW.New.PW7.6.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-24394.pdf
(September 7, 2011) Submission from Michael Brothers (PW.New.PW7.6.11)
(September 7, 2011) Submission from Lino Grima (PW.New.PW7.6.12)

Communications (City Council)

(September 8, 2011) E-mail from Ineke MacNab (CC.Supp.PW7.6.13)

PW7.7 - Emergency Repair of Highland Creek 900mm - 1050mm Sanitary Trunk Sewer

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the reallocation of funding in the Toronto Water 2011 Capital Budget in the amount of $835,000.00 from WBS Element CPW543-01 Watermain Cleaning and Lining, and $5,000,000.00 from CPW543-04 Watermain Structural Lining to  WBS Element CWW014-13 Trunk Sewer Rehabilitation  to provide total available funding of $7,335,000.00 to cover all costs associated with the repair/replacement of the damaged section of Highland Creek Sanitary Trunk Sewer and to repair the Lawrence Avenue roadway.

Origin

(August 29, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the procurement of services and materials related to the emergency repair of the 900mm-1050mm Highland Creek Sanitary Trunk Sewer that crosses under Lawrence Avenue approximately 50 metres east of McCowan Road and to request the approved Toronto Water 2011 Capital Budget be amended to cover all costs associated with the emergency repair.

 

The repair of this trunk sewer was deemed an emergency by the General Manager, Toronto Water under Chapter 195-10F of the Municipal Code. Emergency bypass pumping to convey the flows around the damaged sewer section was implemented immediately under an emergency sole source purchase order. It is necessary to complete the remaining work using an expedited competitive procurement process due to the risk of imminent failure of the trunk sewer. Failure of the trunk sewer could result in a sewage spill into Highland Creek, legislative non-compliance, impact to public health and safety, and the collapse of a portion of Lawrence Avenue denying emergency services and the public access to a major east-west transportation corridor.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 29, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Emergency Repair of Highland Creek 900mm - 1050mm Sanitary Trunk Sewer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-40369.pdf

PW7.9 - Downtown Transportation Operations Study - Terms of Reference

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
20 - Trinity-Spadina, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communication PW7.9.3 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to develop and issue a Request For Proposals along the parameters set out in the report (August 30, 2011) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, for consulting services to undertake a Downtown Transportation Operations Study in the area bounded by: Lake Shore Boulevard/Harbour Street, to the south; Queen Street East/West, to the north; Jarvis Street, to the east; and Bathurst Street, to the west, and Dundas Street between University Avenue and Yonge Street.

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, as applicable during the course of the study, on measures that can be implemented and have been identified as part of the Downtown Transportation Operations Study as short term enhancements that will optimize the use and capacity of the existing infrastructure.

 

3.         City Council amend the Terms of Reference for the Downtown Transportation Operations Study by revising the fifth bullet on page 6 of the report (August 30, 2011) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, under the heading "Key factors", so that it reads "Cycling and pedestrian demands and safety".

 

4.         City Council request that the General Manager, Transportation Services, as part of the Downtown Transportation Operations Study, review the scramble intersection at Dundas Avenue and Yonge Street.

Origin

(August 30, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

This report outlines the Terms of Reference and seeks approval from City Council to issue a Request for Proposals (RFP) to undertake a comprehensive traffic management study in the area bounded by: Lake Shore Boulevard/Harbour Street, to the south; Queen Street East/West, to the north; Jarvis Street, to the east; and Bathurst Street, to the west, hereafter referred to in this report as the Downtown Transportation Operations Study Area. 

 

The Downtown Transportation Operations Study itself is intended to address congestion concerns in the context of the current downtown environment and provide a framework for a cohesive assessment of the many transportation options that are already at various stages of development. It will focus on operational solutions to accommodate safe, efficient movement of people and goods within the downtown area with a specific emphasis on measures for shorter term implementation that will optimize the use and capacity of the existing infrastructure.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 30, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Downtown Transportation Operations Study - Terms of Reference
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-40078.pdf
(August 22, 2011) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Downtown Transportation Operations Study - Terms of Reference - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-40475.pdf

Speakers

Chris Drew, Ward Captain, Bike Union Ward 27 Advocacy Group
Jacob Louy (Submission Filed)

Communications (Committee)

(September 3, 2011) E-mail from Dylan Reid (PW.New.PW7.9.1)
(September 7, 2011) Submission from Jacob Louy (PW.New.PW7.9.2)

Communications (City Council)

(September 21, 2011) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.New.PW7.9.3)

PW7.10 - Authorization to Reimburse Copernicus Lodge from Contract No. 10EY-08RD, Roncesvalles Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Executive Director of Technical Services to reimburse the owners of Copernicus Lodge for undertaking the reconstruction/relocation of a portion of their driveway at No. 66 Roncesvalles Avenue, as shown on the attached Figure 1, which is required due to the reconstruction of Roncesvalles Avenue, in the amount of $19,750.00.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Executive Director of Technical Services to negotiate and execute an agreement, in a form approved by the City Solicitor, for the recommended reimbursement transaction.

Origin

(August 22, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Technical Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to enter into an agreement with the owners of Copernicus Lodge to reimburse them for completing a portion of the driveway reconstruction/realignment at No. 66 Roncesvalles Avenue.  These works were originally included in the scope of work for Contract No. 10EY-08RD, TTC Track Reconstruction, Road Reconfiguration and Reconstruction / Resurfacing and Streetscaping on Roncesvalles Avenue from Queen Street West to Dundas Street West, and are fully funded in the 2010 Capital Budget for Transportation Services. The unspent funds from the 2010 Capital Budget were carried forward into the 2011 Capital Budget.

 

After construction on Roncesvalles Avenue had commenced, Copernicus Lodge representatives requested City staff to provide reimbursement for the cost of the driveway reconstruction/realignment, instead of undertaking the actual construction.  This request was to allow for coordination with other works Copernicus Lodge is undertaking on their property. Technical Services staff supports their request.

 

The tendered price in the contract to undertake both the public and private portions of the driveway reconstruction/realignment is $27,140.00 net of all taxes.  Costs already incurred for temporary and permanent works on the driveway total $7,390.00 net of all taxes. Authorization is being requested to reimburse Copernicus Lodge for the amount of $19,750.00.

Background Information (Committee)

(August 22, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Technical Services, on Authorization to Reimburse Copernicus Lodge from Contract No. 10EY-08RD, Roncesvalles Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-40095.pdf
(August 22, 2011) Attachment - Realigned Driveway at 66 Roncesvalles Avenue (Copernicus Lodge)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-40096.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(September 6, 2011) E-mail from Ted Cieciura, Chairman, Property Management Committee, Copernicus Lodge (PW.New.PW7.10.1)

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 9

EY9.4 - Final Report - 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road (Lots 51 to 63 and Lot 77) - Part Lot Control Exemption Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West
Attention
Bill 1168 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law for the lands formerly known as 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road (Lots 51 to 63 and Lot 77 (inclusive) on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2474) as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (June 1, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

3.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Origin

(June 1, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This report reviews and recommends approval of an application by Lindvest Properties (Westshep) Limited for Part Lot Control Exemption for 14 pairs of semi-detached dwellings (28 units) within the development on lands formerly known as 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road (Lots 51 to 63 and Lot 77 on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2474).

 

An exemption from Part Lot Control will allow each lot containing a pair of semi-detached dwelling units to be subdivided yielding 28 individual residential lots each with a semi detached dwelling unit.

 

The proposal complies with the existing Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 1, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Part Lot Control Exemption Application at 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39352.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(September 12, 2011) Letter from George Hofstedter, President, Lindvest Properties (Westshep) Limited (EY.New.EY9.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-24601.pdf

EY9.5 - Amendment to Site Plan Control By-law - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 1137 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Chapter 326 of the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code substantially in accordance with the draft site plan control by-law attached as Attachment 1 to the report (August 16, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft by-law as may be required.

Origin

(August 16, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This City-initiated amendment is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  This report recommends an amendment to Chapter 326 of the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code in order to add certain zone categories to the list of zone categories that are designated as areas of site plan control. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 16, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Amendment to Site Plan Control By-law.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39956.pdf

EY9.6 - Request for Direction Report - 50 Firwood Crescent - Rezoning Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of:

 

              a.       the application for rezoning:

 

                        -           as reviewed in the report (May 20, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to deletion of Attachment 2F, headed "Elevations"; and

 

                          -         as further reviewed in the supplementary report (September 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, which contains Attachment 1, headed "Revised Attachment 2F - Elevations", and a reduction in townhouse height to a maximum of 10 metres; and

 

              b.       the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached as Attachment 2 to the supplementary report (September 6, 2011) to implement the application.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the Chief Planner or his designate, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to settle the site plan appeal application on conditions satisfactory to the Chief Planner or his designate at the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to take such necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Origin

(May 30, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to redevelop the vacant lot at 50 Firwood Crescent with seven detached dwellings fronting on Firwood Crescent, and 16 freehold townhouse units and 2 semi-detached units fronting on a new public road and cul-de-sac.

 

The application is for a former commercial plaza site in an existing established residential neighbourhood.  The proposed lot sizes, configuration and dwelling type vary from that existing in the neighbourhood.  However, City Planning staff are of the opinion that the proposed development represents an appropriate type and scale of infill development. 

 

The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application, as well as the related Site Plan Approval application to the Ontario Municipal Board, as the deadline provided by the Planning Act for Council’s decision has passed.  No date has been set for the hearing.  An application for Draft Plan of Subdivision has also been submitted for this development but has not been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This report seeks Council's direction with respect to the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval given that a Final Report has not yet been submitted.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 50 Firwood Crescent.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39351.pdf
Draft By-law respecting 50 Firwood Crescent, as presented to the Etobicoke York Community Council on June 22, 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39350.pdf

Speakers

(June 22, 2011) Bruce Nelson
(June 22, 2011) Valeria Giurleo
(June 22, 2011) Dick Howe
(June 22, 2011) Nancy Robertson
(June 22, 2011) Daria Pyskir
(June 22, 2011) Mark Babij
(June 22, 2011) Eros Fiacconi, EGF Associates
(September 12, 2011) Eros Fiacconi, EGF Associates

Communications (Community Council)

(June 20, 2011) E-mail from Bruce Cameron (EY.Main.EY9.6.1)
(September 9, 2011) E-mail from Bruce Cameron (EY.New.EY9.6.2)

6a - Supplementary Report - Request for Direction - 50 Firwood Crescent - Rezoning Application

Origin
(September 6, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

This application proposes to redevelop the vacant lot at 50 Firwood Crescent with seven detached dwellings fronting on Firwood Crescent, and 16 freehold townhouse units and 2 semi-detached units fronting on a new public road and cul-de-sac.

 

Community Council considered a Request for Direction report at its meeting of June 22, 2011.  Some elements of the proposal (inclusion of townhouses, height of townhouses, parking supply and garbage/recycling collection) are of concern to the local community and the Ward Councillor.  Community Council deferred a decision on the recommendations until the meeting of September 12, 2011 to allow City Planning staff and the applicant to continue to discuss and potentially resolve these concerns.  http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2011.EY8.4

 

The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application, as well as the related Site Plan Approval application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), as the deadline provided by the Planning Act for Council’s decision has passed.  No date has been set for the hearing.  An application for Draft Plan of Subdivision has also been submitted for this development but has not been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

The purpose of this report is to report to City Council regarding the negotiations and to seek direction on the position the City will take at the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

City Planning staff have met with the Ward Councillor and the applicant.  The applicant has indicated that his client is prepared to reduce the height of the townhouse to 10 metres from grade to the top of the roof.  This is a reduction of 1.7 metres and one storey.  The applicant is not proposing any changes relating to the other identified issues: parking, garbage collection and number of dwelling units.

Background Information (Community Council)
(September 6, 2011) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a rezoning application at 50 Firwood Crescent.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40526.pdf

EY9.7 - Green Roof By-law Complete Exemption Request Report - 30 Thistle Down Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
1 - Etobicoke North

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the request for complete exemption of the Green Roof requirement for the lands at 30 Thistle Down Boulevard subject to:

 

a.            the Owner paying to the City of Toronto’s Eco-Roof Incentive Program, in accordance with Chapter 492, Green Roof, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, an amount calculated on the basis of $200.00 per square metre of Green Roof required.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

An application has been made by Conseil Scolaire de District Catholique Centre-Sud, for approval of a complete exemption request from the requirement to construct a green roof at 30 Thistle Down Boulevard, as required under Chapter 492, Green Roof, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

 

This report reviews and recommends either approval or refusal of the complete exemption request.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Green Roof By-law Complete Exemption Request at 30 Thistle Down Boulevard.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39807.pdf

EY9.13 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council include the properties at 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West (Gardener’s Cottage, Fetherstonhaugh Estate) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.

 

2.         City Council state its intention to designate that portion of the properties at 2669-2673 Lakeshore Boulevard West (Gardener's Cottage, Fetherstonhough Estate) described as Part of Lots 540 and 541, Plan M-76 and Part of Lot 1, Broken Front Concession, City of Toronto, as shown outlined on the survey (Attachment No. 1 to the report dated August 22, 2011 from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning), under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the designation of the properties.

Origin

(April 20, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West (Gardener’s Cottage, Fetherstonhaugh Estate) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  At its meeting of February 16, 2011, the Etobicoke York Community Council deferred consideration of a report (January 27, 2011) from the Director and Deputy Chief Building Official on a demolition control application to its meeting of May 25, 2011, and requested Heritage Preservation Services to report at that time on the potential heritage value of the building. 

 

Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the properties at 2669-2673, containing a gardener’s cottage associated with the former Fetherstonhaugh Estate, meet the criteria for municipal designation prescribed by the Province of Ontario for its cultural heritage value.  The designation of the properties would enable Council to refuse demolition, control alterations to the sites, and enforce heritage property standards.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 20, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning regarding an Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act at 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-38331.pdf

Speakers

(May 25, 2011) Sean Gosnell, Borden Ladner Gervais, LLP
(May 25, 2011) Alan Hirschfield, Principal, UD + D Incorporated
(May 25, 2011) Madeleine McDowell
(September 12, 2011) Christopher Borgal

Communications (Community Council)

(May 9, 2011) Letter from Sean L. Gosnell, Borden Ladner Gervais (EY.Main.EY9.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-22254.pdf
(May 14, 2011) E-mail from Peter D. Pellier (EY.Main.EY9.13.2)
(May 16, 2011) E-mail from Lisa Croft (EY.Main.EY9.13.3)
(May 19, 2011) E-mail from Denise Harris (EY.Main.EY9.13.4)
(May 19, 2011) Letter from Michael Harrison (EY.New.EY9.13.5)
(May 19, 2011) E-mail from Wendy L. Gamble, President, New Toronto Historical Society, and Chair, Etobicoke Heritage Foundation (EY.Main.EY9.13.6)
(May 24, 2011) Letter from Brenda Bloore, Co-Chair, Ward 6, Community Action Team (EY.Main.EY9.13.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-22251.pdf
(May 24, 2011) E-mail from Jaan Pill (EY.Main.EY9.13.8)
(May 24, 2011) E-mail from Robert Kaross and Peggy Moulder (EY.Main.EY9.13.9)
(May 25, 2011) E-mail from David Juliusson (EY.Main.EY9.13.10)
(September 6, 2011) Letter from Michael Harrison (EY.New.EY9.13.11)

13a - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West

Origin
(May 5, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 5, 2011, considered the following:

 

1.         Report (April 20, 2011) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act – 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West;

 

2.         Letter (May 2, 2011) from Michael Harrison;

 

3.         E-mail (May 3, 2011) from Denise Harris, President, Etobicoke Historical Society;

 

4.         Letter (May 5, 2011) from Lloyd Alter, President, The Architectural Conservancy of Ontario.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 5, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-38335.pdf

13b - Supplementary Report - 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West

Origin
(August 22, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning
Summary

At its meeting of May 25, 2011, the Etobicoke York Community Council deferred Item EY7.5 (Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act – 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West) to its September 12, 2011 meeting.  The deferral was granted to enable the property owners and heritage staff to discuss the proposed designation, including the boundaries of property for the designating by-law.

 

Representatives of the owner of the property at 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West and heritage staff have held two meetings and agreed that the attached survey (Attachment No. 1) provided by the owners identifies the portion of the property containing the Gardener's Cottage, Fetherstonhaugh Estate, and identifies the boundaries of the property to be set out in the designating by-law. The survey reflects the agreement between the owner and the City that the designated lands shall be comprised of only a portion of the property as a whole.

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 22, 2011) Supplementary Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning regarding an Intention to Designate Under Park IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act at 2669-2673 Lake Shore Boulevard West.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40088.pdf
Attachment 1 - Survey
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40089.pdf

EY9.22 - Permanent Closure of Weybourne Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
Bill 1105 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council permanently close Weybourne Place, shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2011- 071 in Attachment 1 to the report (August 8, 2011) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (August 8, 2011) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a public meeting on September 12, 2011, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's web site. No one appeared before the Community Council.

Origin

(August 8, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request City Council’s approval to permanently close Weybourne Place. This public highway is surplus to municipal transportation requirements.

 

Notice advising the public of the City’s intention to close Weybourne Place was given in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 162 of City of Toronto Municipal Code and the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 8, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding permanent closure of Weybourne Place.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39958.pdf
Appendix A and Attachments 1-4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40094.pdf

Declared Interests (Community Council)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Vincent Crisanti - as he is related to the owner of property which abuts the subject lands.

EY9.23 - Proposed Permanent Closure of a Portion of the Old Mill Drive Right-of-Way North of Bloor Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Public Notice Given

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council permanently close that part of the public highway known as Old Mill Drive, shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS-2011-065 (Attachment 1 to the report dated August 8, 2011) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District ), and legally described as Part 2 on Plan 66R-25093(the "Highway"), and enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix “A” to the report (August 8, 2011) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District, conditional on the City entering into an agreement with Humberview Auto Centre Limited, the owner of 1 Old Mill Drive (the "Owner") wherein the Owner agrees to purchase the Highway on terms satisfactory to the City.

 

2.         City Council direct that, following the closing of the Highway, the Owner, at its sole cost and expense, shall relocate the existing 150mm watermain along this section of the Old Mill Drive municipal boulevard in conjunction with the proposed re-alignment of Old Mill Drive north of Bloor Street West provided to the satisfaction of Toronto Water.

 

3.         City Council direct that, following the closing of the Highway, the Owner, at its sole cost and expense, shall make arrangements with Enbridge Gas Distribution to remove and relocate the existing natural gas plant along this section of the Old Mill Drive municipal boulevard provided to the satisfaction of Enbridge Gas Distribution.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as the City Solicitor considers reasonable.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a public meeting on September 12, 2011, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's web site. No one appeared before the Community Council.

Origin

(August 8, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request City Council’s approval to permanently close an untravelled section of the east side of the Old Mill Drive right-of-way, just north of Bloor Street West. This portion of public highway is surplus to municipal requirements.

 

Notice advising the public of the City’s intention to close this portion of Old Mill Drive was given in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 162 of City of Toronto Municipal Code and the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 8, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District regarding the proposed permanent closure of a portion of the Old Mill Drive Right-of-Way north of Bloor Street West.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39991.pdf
Attachment 1 - Area Sketch, Attachment 2 - Aerial Photograph
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39992.pdf

EY9.38 - Prohibited Turns and Through Prohibitions - Jane Street and Wright Avenue/Driveway

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - York South-Weston
Attention
Bill 1148 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the enactment of a “Compulsory Turn” regulation during all time periods for eastbound traffic on Wright Avenue to the driveway to 1671 Jane Street, from the west side of Jane Street.

 

2.         City Council approve the enactment of a southbound "No Left Turn" prohibition, during all time periods, on Jane Street at the driveway to 1671 Jane Street, located opposite Wright Avenue.

 

3.         City Council approve the enactment of a northbound "No Right Turn" prohibition, during all time periods on Jane Street, at the driveway to 1671 Jane Street located opposite Wright Avenue.

Origin

(July 29, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the need for turn regulations at the intersection of Jane Street and Wright Avenue to prohibit traffic from entering the recently proposed one-way (exiting) driveway from the loading docks of 1671 Jane Street (No Frills), located opposite Wright Avenue.

 

Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Jane Street, City Council approval of this report is required. The TTC has been consulted on this item and they do not object to these regulations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(July 29, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District regarding prohibited turns and through prohibitions on Jane Street and Wright Avenue.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40231.pdf
Attachment 1 - Area Map.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40232.pdf

EY9.52 - Accessible Parking Space - Etobicoke York District - September 2011 (non-delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport
Attention
Bill 1163 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of an on-street accessible parking space at the location identified in Appendix A attached to the report dated August 17, 2011 from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District.

Origin

(August 17, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of an on-street accessible parking space for persons with disabilities.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject street, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 17, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District regarding an Accessible Parking Space (non-delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40049.pdf

EY9.56 - Proposed Renaming of Private Lanes - Oakdale Village

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant an exemption to the Street Naming Policy and approve the following names to identify the private lanes located east of Torbarrie Road, between Judy Sgro Drive and Sergio Marchi Street:

 

                        Adam Oates, Jason Allison, Odoardo Di Santo, Ted Wray, and William Morris,

 

            with the following additional names available as alternates:

 

                        Claudio Vena, Ron Chambers, Pat Flatley, Jim Fleming and Steve Pitt.

Origin

(June 22, 2011) Presentation from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti

Summary

City Council on July 12, 13 and 14, 2011, referred Item EY8.49 back to the Etobicoke York Community Council for further consideration.

 

Approval is being sought for the renaming of private lanes in Oakdale Village.

Background Information (Community Council)

Item EY8.49 - considered by Etobicoke York Community Council on June 22, 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-39679.pdf

56a - Naming of Proposed Public Street at 3035 Weston Road and Naming of Private Streets Located East of Torbarrie Road, between Judy Sgro Avenue and Sergio Marchi Street

Origin
(June 30, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Technical Services
Summary

This report responds to a directive from the Etobicoke York Community Council to the  City Surveyor for a report to the City Council meeting of July 12, 2011 regarding the proposed street names for two developments in Ward 7.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 30, 2011) Report from the Executive Director, Technical Services regarding the Naming of Public and Private Streets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40341.pdf

EY9.61 - Macedo Winery - 1381 Dufferin Street - Application to AGCO to Sell and Serve Wine

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council support Macedo Winery's application to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario to sell and serve wine for consumption by patrons at its location at 1381 Dufferin Street, and the City Clerk be directed to advise the AGCO accordingly.

Origin

(August 29, 2011) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio

Summary

David Macedo and his family are a licensed manufacturer and retailer of wine that operate from their 1381 Dufferin Street location.  In the time that it has operated at this site, Macedo Winery has significantly helped to revitalize the neighbourhood.  Ultimately, it is a unique operation, as they hold 1 of only 33 such licences in Ontario and 1 of only 2 licenses in the City of Toronto.  One condition of the licence is that the winery offers regular, free tours to the public because experience has shown that the public is interested in watching a winery in operation.  The winery is on the published wine tour list for sight-seeing which has created an unexpected tourist attraction in my ward.

 

The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario has provided the opportunity for such a winery to promote its wines by selling it by-the-glass in its retail store, a feature officially described by the AGCO as wine-by-the-glass. One of the requirements is to have the municipality pass a resolution allowing same.  Therefore I am asking that City Council approve the recommendation to support their application.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 29, 2011) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio regarding an application by Macedo Winery to sell and serve wine
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40467.pdf

EY9.62 - 30 Beverly Hills Drive - Objection to Liquor License Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for Classic Lounge, 30 Beverly Hills Drive (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and to take all necessary action to give effect to these Recommendations, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Origin

(September 2, 2011) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti

Summary

2280882 Ontario Inc. has made an application to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ("AGCO") for a liquor licence for the premises located at 30 Beverly Hills Drive to operate as Classic Lounge ("Premises"). The application is for an indoor capacity of 720 persons and an outdoor patio with a capacity of 108 persons.

 

The Registrar of the AGCO should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application. Issues including, but not limited to, security, crowd control, noise, litter and safety of the patrons, public and staff must be addressed and appropriate conditions must be attached to the licence. This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, as set out above, are attached to the licence.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 2, 2011) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti regarding an application for a liquor licence at 30 Beverly Hills Drive.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-40527.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 9

NY9.14 - Draft By-law - To Permanently Close the Easterly Portion of Westgate Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre
Attention
Bill 1103 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law from the City Solicitor, to permanently close the easterly portion of Westgate Boulevard.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a public meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City’s website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on June 22, 2011.

 

Bill Snodgras, Senior Engineer, Toronto Water, addressed the North York Community Council on September 12, 2011 and responded to questions from the North York Community Council regarding the proposal to permanently close the easterly portion of Westgate Boulevard.

Origin

(May 31, 2011) Draft By-law from the City Solicitor

Summary

To enact By-law to permanently close the easterly portion of Westgate Boulevard.

Background Information (Community Council)

Draft By-law from the City Solicitor - To Permanently Close the Easterly Portion of Westgate Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39826.pdf
Public Notice - Draft By-law - To Permanently Close the Easterly Portion of Westgate Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39827.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(September 12, 2011) E-mail from Patrick Smyth, Director, for and on behalf of ARECA (NY.New.NY9.14.1)

NY9.28 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 100 Miranda Avenue, 18 Holmes Avenue, 25 Buchan Court, 250 Sparks Avenue and 30 Harrison Gardens Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 23 - Willowdale, 24 - Willowdale, 33 - Don Valley East
Attention
Bill 1164 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 100 Miranda Avenue, 18 Holmes Avenue, 25 Buchan Court, 250 Sparks Avenue and 30 Harrison Gardens Boulevard.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(June 29, 2011) Report from Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 29, 2011) Report from Toronto Fire Services on Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 100 Miranda Ave, 18 Holmes Ave, 25 Buchan Court, 250 Sparks Ave, and 30 Harrison Gardens Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39404.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft By-law - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39405.pdf

NY9.29 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
Bill 1165 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(July 19, 2011) Report from Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(July 19, 2011) Report from Toronto Fire Services on Designation of Fire Routes at 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39993.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft By-law - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39994.pdf

NY9.33 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council concur in the action taken in approving a liquor licence extension from 10:00 a.m. until 4:00 a.m. each day for The Abbot Pub and Fair, 3367 Yonge Street, the establishment listed in the attachment to the letter (August 17, 2011) from Troy Burtch, Co-founder, for Toronto Beer Week to be held from September 16 to September 24, 2011.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council directed that:

 

1.         Due to the timing of the following event, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission be advised that it has no objection to the request for:

 

a.         liquor licence extension from 10:00 a.m. until 4:00 a.m. each day for The Abbot Pub and Fare, 3367 Yonge Street, the establishment listed in the attachment to the letter (August 17, 2011) from Troy Burtch, Co-Founder, as part of Toronto Beer Week to be held from September 16 to September 24, 2011.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(August 17, 2011) Letter from Troy Burtch, Co-founder, Toronto Beer Week, requesting liquor license extension for the Toronto Beer Week event, to be held from September 16 to September 24, 2011, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m., at The Abbot Pub and Fare, 3367 Yonge Street. (NY.Main.NY9.33.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/comm/communicationfile-23870.pdf

NY9.35 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 238 St. Leonard's Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any relevant Staff to attend at all proceedings before the Ontario Municipal Board pertaining to the appeal of the Committee of Adjustment decision with respect to 238 St. Leonard's Avenue to uphold the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.

Origin

(August 11, 2011) Memo from Councillor Robinson

Summary

On June 15, 2011, the North York panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused three variances pertaining to the application regarding 238 St. Leonard's Avenue.  The applicant was seeking numerous variances.  This property was the subject of a previous Committee of Adjustment application for the construction of a new two storey home which was approved for an existing lot frontage and width of 13.9m, and existing lot area of 615m2, which was appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, where the Board's decision to approve only the variances requested for existing lot frontage and width and existing lot area.

 

The applicant was requesting approval from the Committee of Adjustment to construct a three storey home with a below grade parking area that is not permitted under By-laws 1196-2009 and 7625 due to more than 50% of the height of the basement level being located above the established grade.  This was refused by the Committee of Adjustment on June 15, 2011.  The Toronto Water Division confirmed information brought forth at the previous Board hearing regarding the absence of storm sewers on St. Leonard's Avenue, and should approval be given for a below grade garage there is potential for flooding as a result of the inability to create a storm sewer connection.

 

This request is made to authorize the City Solicitor and a planner to attend before the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the application.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 11, 2011) Memo from Councillor Robinson on Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 238 St. Leonard's Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39931.pdf
(June 15, 2011) Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision on 238 St. Leonard's Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39932.pdf
(June 7, 2011) Staff Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Chair & members of the Committee of Adjustment, North York District, on Committee of Adjustment Application at 238 St. Leonard's Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39933.pdf

NY9.38 - Public Art Plan - The Station - 545-555 Wilson Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 545-555 Wilson Avenue - The Station - Public Art Plan attached to the report dated July 19, 2011 from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(July 19, 2011) Report from Robert Freedman, Director, Urban Design

Summary

This report seeks City Council’s approval of 545 - 555 Wilson Avenue - The Station - Public Art Plan.  The Plan has been prepared by the owner in compliance with the development approval provisions.  The Plan, included as Attachment 1 to this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art in publicly-accessible, privately-owned areas of the development site.

 

The Station site is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Wilson Avenue and Tippet Road, a block east of the Wilson Subway Station.

 

545-555 Wilson Avenue- The Station - Public Art Plan provides a framework for a public art commission in the proposed location.  The attached Plan meets the objectives of the City Planning Percent for Public Art Program and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(July 19, 2011) Report from Robert Freedman, Director, Urban Design on Public Art Plan at 545-555 Wilson Avenue - The Station
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39987.pdf
Attachment 1 - 545-555 Wilson Avenue - The Station Condominiums Public Art Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39988.pdf

NY9.39 - Public Art Plan - 3180 Bathurst Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Community Council Recommendations

 North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 3180 Bathurst Street - Public Art Plan attached to the report dated July 19, 2011 from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(July 19, 2011) Report from Robert Freedman, Director, Urban Design

Summary

This report seeks City Council’s approval of the 3180 Bathurst Street Public Art Plan. The Plan has been prepared by the owner in compliance with the development approval provisions. The Plan, included as Attachment 1 to this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art in publicly-accessible, privately-owned areas of the development site.

 

The site is located at 3180 Bathurst Street on the southwest corner of Bathurst Street and Saranac Boulevard.

 

The 3180 Bathurst Street Public Art Plan provides a framework for a public art commission in the proposed location. The attached Plan meets the objectives of the City Planning Percent for the Public Art Program and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(July 19, 2011) Report from Robert Freedman, Director, Urban Design on Public Art Plan at 3180 Bathurst Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40006.pdf
Attachment 1 - Public Art Plan for 3180 Bathurst Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40007.pdf

NY9.40 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 2205 Sheppard Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
33 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize City staff to attend the OMB hearing in support of the proposed development at 2205 Sheppard Avenue East subject to resolution of the following issues and conditions as detailed in the report (September 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District and set out below:

 

a.         The Owner addressing the following design related matters to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District:

 

i.          the building massing and configuration of the tall building(s) be further refined to eliminate the shadow impacts on the public sidewalk on the north side of Sheppard Avenue East;

 

ii.         the building setback along Sheppard Avenue East be increased to 5 metres; and

 

iii.        the built form of Building A (the 5-storey building along Sheppard Avenue East) be extended further west such that the west wall is parallel to the west property line with a setback not exceeding 11 metres.

 

b.         The owner agreeing to a Section 37 contribution to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District; and

 

c.         The owner addressing the servicing and transportation services requirements outlined in the memorandum dated August 8, 2011 to the satisfaction of the Director, Development Engineering, Technical Services Division.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the OMB to withhold its Order(s) approving the Zoning By-law amendment until such time as:

 

a.         The owner has entered into an agreement with the City to secure community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and City Solicitor;

 

b.         An appropriate Zoning By-law amendment is prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor. The implementing Zoning By-law should incorporate performance standards which include, but not be limited to, regulations on parking and loading standards, maximum building heights, maximum building floor plates and envelopes, residential and commercial gross floor area on the Atria IV site and commercial gross floor areas on the existing Atria I, II and III employment lands, minimum building setbacks, maximum number of dwelling units, minimum indoor and outdoor recreational amenity area, provision of locker space, bicycle parking spaces, and appropriate Section 37 contributions;

 

c.         The Owner has applied for Site Plan Approval and enters into an agreement under Section 41(7) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor to secure conditions of Site Plan approval;

 

d.         The owner has made an application for Plan of Subdivision to secure matters relating to the proposed east-west public road and the conversion of the north portion of Atria Boulevard to a public road to the satisfaction of the Director, Development Engineering, Technical Services Division; and

 

e.         The owner has addressed the requirements outlined in the memorandum dated August 10, 2011 to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation.

 

3.         City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues outlined in the report (September 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and, if necessary, seek further instructions from Council regarding any matters to be resolved prior to the OMB hearing.

Origin

(September 6, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

In its decision dated August 28, 2009 the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) approved the re-designation of the site at 2205 Sheppard Avenue East from Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas to permit a mixed-use development. The second phase of the hearing, scheduled for October 13, 2011, will deal the rezoning portion of the application. The purpose of this report is to provide information on the application and seek Council's direction for the upcoming hearing.

 

The applicant is proposing a mixed-use development comprising 1,095 dwelling units contained within 5 buildings. The site design includes a 5-storey mid-rise building along Sheppard Avenue East frontage and 4 taller buildings within the site interior with heights of 8, 17, 23 and 43 storeys. The building along Sheppard Avenue East includes 939 m² of grade related retail space. Parking for 1,282 vehicles would be provided in a four level underground parking structure. The application also proposes two public roads and 0.29 ha (2,947m²) of public parkland.

 

As this matter has been appealed to the OMB this report recommends the City Solicitor and other appropriate staff attend the hearing in support of the proposed development at 2205 Sheppard Avenue East subject to resolution of issues including: site servicing and public road matters set out in the Technical Services comments dated August 8, 2011; the provision of appropriate community benefits pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act; securing public parkland as set out in the Parks, Forestry and Recreation comments dated August 10, 2011, and adjustments to the proposed built form.

 

Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the issues outlined in this report and, if necessary, seek further instruction from Council for additional instructions regarding any matters to be resolved before the OMB.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 6, 2011) Supplementary Report & Attachments 1-11 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Rezoning Application at 2205 Sheppard Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40546.pdf
(August 19, 2011) Status Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Rezoning Application at 2205 Sheppard Avenue East - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40202.pdf

Speakers

Mark Flowers, Solicitor, of the law firm of Davies Howe, on behalf of the property owner

NY9.41 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - David Dunlap Circle, Block A, Plan 66M-2365 (formerly part of 39 Green Belt Drive)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
34 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council not support the Zoning By-law Amendment Application for David Dunlap Circle, Block A, Plan 66M-2365 (formerly part of 39 Green Belt Drive) for, among other matters, the following reasons:  traffic, parking and intensity of the development.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the application and to hire outside planning and other consultants, if necessary.

Origin

(August 19, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The applicant is proposing to amend the site specific Zoning By-law that applies to the site to permit an increase in building height from 8 to 9-storeys and an increase in the number of dwelling units from 192 to 350. The rooftop indoor amenity area permitted above the 8th floor would be relocated to the ground floor level. No changes are proposed to the approved zoning permission regarding density or gross floor area.

 

On April 27, 2011, the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law amendment application, as well as the Site Plan application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the prescribed time frames set out in the Planning Act. 

 

The hearing is scheduled to commence on November 14, 2011.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council’s direction on the appeals and authorization for the City Solicitor and necessary City staff to attend the OMB in support of the applications subject to the conditions outlined in the report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 19, 2011) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application at David Dunlap Circle, Block A, Plan 66M-2365 (formerly part of 39 Green Belt Drive)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40198.pdf

Speakers

Moiz Behar, on behalf of Ghods Builders
Sid Catalano

NY9.42 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment for the Consumers Road Employment Area

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
33 - Don Valley East
Attention
Bill 1169 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands shown as the Consumers Road Employment Area substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (August 24, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         In the event the proposed amendment is appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the recommendations contained within the report (August 24, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 12, 2011 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council.

Origin

(August 24, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

In October 2009 City Council enacted an interim control by-law for the Consumers Road Employment Area prohibiting new places of worship for a period of one year. In August 2010 Council extended the interim control by-law for one additional year to October 2011 pending the completion of a study of places of worship in this area. This report reviews the policies and regulations pertaining to places of worship in this area.

 

The current zoning of lands within the Consumers Road Employment Area does not implement the intent of the Official Plan. There is a disconnect between Plan policy direction and its implementation. The Plan indicates that Employment Districts are to be protected from the encroachment of non-economic functions and promoted for economic activity and that the prime economic function of Employment Areas is business and economic activity. Current zoning permits places of worship as-of-right on all properties in the employment area subject to provisions related to impacts on residential zones.

 

Within this current zoning framework there is no opportunity to fully examine the impacts of places of worship on employment uses.

 

This report proposes to amend Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the Consumers Road Employment Area to prohibit places of worship in this area. A proposal for a new place of worship would require a rezoning. An existing place of worship would be permitted to continue. The approach recommended in this report would enable staff to undertake a comprehensive review of the impacts of a proposal for a place of worship on a site by site basis.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2011) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment for the Consumers Road Employment Area
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40212.pdf

NY9.43 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment - 25 Buchan Court

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
33 - Don Valley East
Attention
Bill 1161 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625 for the lands known in 2004 as 25 Buchan Court substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (August 9, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the Section 37 Agreement dated February 16, 2007 applying to the lands at 25 Buchan Court to:

 

a.         Amend Section 3.1 entitled ‘Contributions to Park Improvements’ to permit that $45,827.50 be used by the City for the redevelopment of Clovercrest Park and that $44,172.50 be used by the City for improvements to Lescon Park;

 

b.         Replace Section 4.1 entitled ‘Contributions for Lighting and Walking Trail’ with ‘Contributions to Park Improvement’ and identify that $15,000 may be used by the City toward improvements to Lescon Park.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 12, 2011 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council.

Origin

(August 9, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

At its meeting of July 12, 2011 City Council directed staff to bring forward a report and Zoning By-law amendment to the North York Community Council meeting of September 12, 2011 for the lands known in 2004 as 25 Buchan Court.  The report recommends a Zoning By-law amendment that redirects some of the Section 37 funds for improvements to Cloverdale Park and Dallington Ravine to Lescon Park. The report also recommends that the Section 37 agreement be amended to reflect this change.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 9, 2011) Final Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment at 25 Buchan Court
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40191.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(August 26, 2011) E-mail from Robert Graham (NY.Main.NY9.43.1)

NY9.44 - Final Report - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 484 Lytton Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium for the lands at 484 Lytton Boulevard, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (August 18, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (August 18, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration;  and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

2.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 484 Lytton Boulevard as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to the report (August 18, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

3.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of Revenue Services, City of Toronto, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

4.         Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or mortgage any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.

 

6.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 12, 2011 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council.

 

Christopher May, Assistant Planner, gave a presentation to the North York Community Council on the Common Elements Condominium Application and the Part Lot Control Application for 484 Lytton Boulevard.

Origin

(August 18, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The condominium application proposes to establish the rear driveway at 484 Lytton Boulevard as a common element.  The common elements condominium is required to provide legal vehicular access to nine residential townhouse units and to ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the driveway by the condominium corporation.

 

The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act is required to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the nine residential townhouse units fronting Bathurst Street.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and approval of the application for Part Lot Control Exemption.  In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 18, 2011) Final Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application at 484 Lytton Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40176.pdf

NY9.45 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control, Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion and Residential Demolition Applications - 31-45 Horsham Avenue, 20-26, 34 and 35 Churchill Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the former City of North York substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to the report (August 24, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment:

           

a.         the Owner shall enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure and provide facilities, services and/or matters as generally outlined below:

           

i.          at grade bicycle storage space totalling 81.05 m²;

 

ii.         a minimum of 1.5 m² per dwelling unit of indoor recreational amenity space;

 

iii.        a monetary contribution in the form of a certified cheque and satisfactory to the City, to fund 380.4 m² of proposed gross floor area, toward the provision of public recreation centres and/or toward the cost of the City acquiring lands necessary for the completion of planned service roads and associated road network and buffer areas in the North York Centre, and which shall be indexed upwardly to the Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch Index from the date of the Section 37 Agreement. The amount of the monetary contribution shall be equal to the market value, based on land value, of 380.4 m2 of proposed gross floor area, as determined by the Director of Real Estate Services and provided to the City prior to the enactment of the Zoning By-law; and

 

iv.        a density transfer conveyance from 34 and 35 Churchill Avenue totalling 3,621.28 m² for public open space purposes.

 

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

           

i.          6.2 metre radius corner roundings at the intersections of Canterbury Place and Churchill Avenue, Churchill Avenue and Beecroft Road, and at Beecroft Road and Horsham Avenue shall be conveyed to the City;

 

ii.         The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee;

 

iii.        The Owner will be required to file a letter of credit to secure the owners obligations, including the estimated costs of demolition, environmental remediation to Ministry of Environment standards for park purposes to put the property at 35 Churchill Avenue into base park condition to the satisfaction of the City, contingencies and anticipated increases in costs of all of the foregoing during the escrow period. The letter of credit will not be released or reduced until the owner has complied with all obligations in the Section 37 Agreement, including the completion of the conveyance of the 35 Churchill Avenue to City ownership;

 

iv.        The Owner will be required to convey lands for park purposes free and clear, above and below grade of all physical obstructions and easements, encumbrances and encroachments, including surface and subsurface easements, unless otherwise approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation;

 

v.         The Owner is required to pay for the costs of the preparation and registration of all relevant documents; and

 

vi.        The Owner shall provide to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor all legal descriptions and applicable reference plans of survey for the new parkland.

 

c.         The Owner shall purchase from the City a 23.4 m2 strip of land along the western edge of the site fronting the future Beecroft Road extension;

 

d.         The Owner shall convey to City ownership 34 Churchill Avenue for public open space purposes;

           

 e.        The Owner shall enter into an Escrow Agreement, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and at the applicants sole cost, for the future conveyance of 35 Churchill Avenue to the City as described in the body of the report (August 24, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, for parkland purposes; and

 

f.          The Owner shall register a Section 118 Restriction on title for 35 Churchill Avenue.

 

 4.        City Council approve in principle the site plan drawing attached as Attachment No. 1, the draft Conditions of Site Plan Approval as listed in Attachment No. 11 to the report (August 24, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and the parkland conveyance conditions as listed in Attachment No. 12 to the report (August 24, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

5.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner or his designate to give final approval to the Site Plan Control Application, in consultation with the Local Councillor, once the draft conditions to be satisfied prior to Site Plan Control Approval as set out in Attachment No. 11 to the report (August 24, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, have been fulfilled, including entering into a satisfactory Site Plan Agreement under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act.

 

6.         City Council approve the application to demolish the 10 existing residential units, including 1 residential rental housing units located at 24 Churchill Avenue pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363.

 

7.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667.

 

8.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         The owner erect a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

b.         Should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

9.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a demolition permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for 34 Churchill Avenue, after the applicant has filed a demolition application.

 

10.       City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a demolition permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for 35 Churchill Avenue, once all conditions of the Escrow Agreement have been met and after the applicant has filed a demolition application.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 12, 2011 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 24, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The applicant is proposing to amend the Zoning By-law in order to develop the subject lands with a 229 unit residential development for lands located at 31-45 Horsham Avenue and 20-26 Churchill Avenue.

 

The application involves the demolition of nine residential houses, one of which includes a rental unit, in order to construct 209 apartment units in an 18 storey tower located at the corner of Canterbury Place and Churchill Avenue, and 20 three-storey townhouse units along the frontage of Horsham Avenue and the future Beecroft Road extension.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law and approval in principle of the Draft Conditions of Site plan Approval.

 

The applicant has also submitted an application to demolish nine existing residential dwelling houses, one of which contains a rental unit, located at 24 Churchill Avenue. The application to demolish the one rental unit, is regulated under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act and the applications to demolish the existing residential buildings is regulated under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code and Section 33 of the Planning Act.

 

This report recommends approval of the Rental Housing Demolition application under Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act and issuance of the residential demolition permit pursuant to Section 33 of the Planning Act and Municipal Code Chapter 363.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2011) Final Report and Attachments 1-12 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan Control, Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion and Residential Demolition Applications - 31-45 Horsham Avenue, 20-26, 34 and 35 Churchill Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40211.pdf

Speakers

Adam Brown, Solicitor, of the law firm of Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, on behalf of applicant
Simon Yuen, Secretary, Board of Directors, TSCC 1918

Communications (Community Council)

(August 25, 2011) E-mail from David O'Sullivan, on behalf of Tiffany Court Home Owners Association and various other Horsham Avenue homeowners (NY.Main.NY9.45.1)
(September 11, 2011) E-mail from Simon Yuen, Secretary, Board of Directors, DIA Condominiums, submitted by Ling Wong (NY.New.NY9.45.2)

NY9.46 - Final Report - Official Plan, Rezoning, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - 35-53 and 101-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
34 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that: 

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 35-53 and 101-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council amend the Zoning By-law for the lands at 35-53 and 101-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning Bylaw Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the height map amended in accordance with the revised height map attached to the motion by Councillor Minnan-Wong, which in essence, revises the heights of buildings on the north site so as to ensure that no height exceeds 24 storeys, with any amendments to the by-law and other documents necessary to implement the revised height map, to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District.  Building A will be reduced to 24 storeys. Building B will be revised to 24 storeys. Building C will be reduced to 14 storeys. Buildings D and E will remain the same at 24 and 12 storeys respectively.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner shall submit revisions to the servicing and stormwater management report and financial securities to guarantee the sanitary downstream improvements of the existing sanitary municipal sewer, to the satisfaction of the Director, Development Engineering, Technical Services Division.

 

 5.        City Council require the community benefits and other matters detailed below to be secured in a Section 37 Agreement between the owner and the City of Toronto, and that the Agreement be registered on title to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment.

 

6.         City Council require the owner to provide the following facilities, services and matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act:

 

a.         The owner is to provide a financial contribution to the City of $2,000,000, of which $1,750,000 to be used for the expansion/renovation of Brookbanks Library or the construction of the combined Brookbanks Library/Recreation-community centre facilities on the Brookbanks Library site or other community recreational facility in the area, and $250,000 to be used for the future rehabilitation/renovation of the Milne House in Ward 34.  The financial contribution is to be paid as follows:

 

i.          A cash contribution of $304,000 paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for Building A.

ii.         A cash contribution of $303,000 paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for Building B.

iii.        A cash contribution of $163,000 paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for Building C.

iv.        A cash contribution of $385,000 paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for Building D.

v.         A cash contribution of $244,000 paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for Building F.

vi.        A cash contribution of $234,000 paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for Building G.

vii.       A cash contribution of $117,000 paid prior to the issuance of any building permits for Building H.

viii.      Each instalment payment set out in (i) to (vii) above shall be indexed to the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.

ix.        In addition, the owner is to provide a cash contribution to the City of $250,000 to be used for capital improvements to publicly owned affordable housing projects in the community. This financial contribution is to be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for the first non-rental residential building and shall be indexed to the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.

x.         In addition, the owner is to provide a cash contribution of $250,000 for the future rehabilitation/renovation of the Milne House prior to the issuance of a building permit for Building A, and the cash contribution shall be indexed to the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.

 

b.         The provision and maintenance on the site of not less than 270 new replacement rental dwelling units for a period of at least 20 years, comprising:

 

i.          130 townhouse and stacked townhouse units located on Block 17 comprised of 100 three-bedroom units and 30 four-bedroom units.

ii.         140 dwelling units in an apartment building located on Block 2 comprised of 30 one-bedroom units, 48 two-bedroom units, and 62 three-bedroom units.

iii.        83 of the 270 units shall have affordable rents and the remaining units shall have rents no higher than mid-range rents.

iv.        The rental housing shall be provided in accordance with more detailed terms as set forth in the draft zoning by-law attached as Attachment 8 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

c.         The owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance for tenants in the existing buildings in accordance with the detailed terms set forth in the draft zoning by-law attached as Attachment 8 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

d.         The owner shall prepare a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Strategy, prior to the issuance of the first building permit (including demolition and/or excavation permit) in each phase of the construction, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

7.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement:

 

a.         The owner agrees that construction shall proceed in accordance with the development Phasing Plan (Attachment 9 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District) except that Phase 4 can commence prior to the completion of Phase 3.

 

b.         The owner shall prepare a Construction Management Plan and Neighbourhood Communication Strategy, prior to the issuance of the first building permit (including demolition and/or excavation permit), to the satisfaction of the Director, Development Engineering, Technical Services Division in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

c.         The owner is to provide a certified cheque to the Toronto Transit Commission (T.T.C.) for $100,000 for transit signal priority intersection improvements as noted in the memorandum of the Toronto Transit Commission dated April 12, 2011; this is to be paid to the T.T.C. prior to the issuance of any building permit for any residential buildings in Phase 2.

 

8.         City Council direct that the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges will be used to construct the Above Base Park Improvements. The Owner shall receive a development charge credit for the Above Base Park Improvements. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of installing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law.

 

9.         City Council approve the application to demolish the existing residential rental dwelling units located at 35 to 53 and 101 to 113 Valley Woods Road and 1213 to 1229 York Mills Road pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for replacement of the rental housing units:

 

a.         The provision and maintenance on the site of not less than 270 new replacement rental dwelling units for a period of at least 20 years, comprising:

 

i.          130 townhouse and stacked townhouse units located on Block 17 comprised of 100 three-bedroom units and 30 four-bedroom units.

ii.         140 dwelling units in an apartment building located on Block 2 comprised of 30 one-bedroom units, 48 two-bedroom units, and 62 three-bedroom units.

iii.        83 of the 270 units shall have affordable rents and the remaining units shall have rents no higher than mid-range rents.

iv.        The rental housing shall be provided in accordance with more detailed terms as set forth in Attachment 8 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

v.         The owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance for tenants in the existing buildings, including the right for eligible tenants to return to a replacement rental unit, in accordance with the detailed terms set forth in Attachment 8 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

vi.        The owner shall prepare a Construction Mitigation and Tenant Communication Strategy, prior to the issuance of the first building permit (including demolition and/or excavation permit) in each phase of the construction, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

b.         The owner shall enter into, and register on title, one or more Section 111 Agreements to secure the conditions outlined in a. above and as detailed in the draft zoning bylaw amendment (Attachment 8), to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor.

 

c.         The owner shall enter into and register, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or his designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands.

 

d.         The owner shall first seek and obtain a building permit for the initial 130 replacement rental townhouse and stacked townhouse units prior to the issuance of any other building permit on site other than for a permit for excavation and shoring.

 

e.         The owner shall seek and obtain a building permit for the 140 replacement rental apartment units on the north site prior to the issuance of any other building permit during Phase 2 on the north site, other than for a permit for excavation and shoring.

 

10.       City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue a preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for any of the existing rental housing buildings in any specific phase of the development after the latest of the following has occurred:

 

a.         The satisfaction of the conditions in Recommendation 8.

 

b.         The Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments in Recommendations 1 and 2 have come into full force and effect.

 

c.         The issuance of the site plan approval for the development by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or his designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

11.       City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, has issued the preliminary approval in Recommendation 9 for any of the existing rental housing buildings in any specific phase of the development.

 

12.       City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for any of the rental housing buildings no earlier than issuance of the first building permit for the foundation of the buildings in that phase of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation No. 9, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         The owner complete a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the date the permit is issued for demolition of the buildings.

 

b.         Should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 11(a), the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

13.       In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, as revised and attached to the motion by Councillor Minnan-Wong, which eliminates the road connection from the North Site to Valley Woods Road, which is replaced with a cul-de-sac as depicted on the revised Attachment 2 attached to the motion by Councillor Minnan-Wong, and further, direct that all by-law maps and other maps referenced herein be revised to reflect the elimination of the connection of the North Site public road to Valley Woods Road to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and subject to:

 

a.         The conditions as generally listed in Attachment No. 10 to the report (June 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of subdivision for registration.

 

b.         The applicant submitting revisions to the servicing and stormwater management report and financial securities to guarantee the sanitary downstream improvements of the existing sanitary municipal sewer, to the satisfaction of the Director, Development Engineering, Technical Services Division prior to the approval of the draft plan of subdivision.

 

c.         Any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going Development Engineering, Technical Services review and the review by other divisions of this development.

 

14.       City Council require that, in conjunction with the development, a parking layby lane on the south side of York Mills Road, from Valley Woods Road to Clayland Drive, be implemented, with all associated costs to be bourne by the developer, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 22, 2011 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  Ten (10) persons addressed the North York Community Council on June 22, 2011 and are listed under the heading titled "Speakers".

 

Nimrod Salamon, Senior Planner, Community Planning, North York District, on June 22, 2011, gave a presentation to the North York Community Council on the proposed development.

Origin

(June 6, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The rezoning and rental housing demolition proposal for 35-53 and 101-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road is to demolish the existing 245 rental townhouses and replace them with 270 residential rental units and 1,610 residential condominium units.  Building heights would range from 3 storey townhouses to 12 to 27 storey apartment buildings.  The proposal also includes a new public road connecting Valley Woods Road to York Mills Road as part of a draft plan of subdivision application.

 

The Official Plan Amendment application is to approve replacement of rental housing with a different unit mix and to add a site-specific policy to the subject lands which specifies that, as an alternative to affordable housing, the priority community benefits pursuant to Section 37 be a cash contribution for capital improvements to affordable housing and a cash contribution for community and recreation facilities.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law and for Rental Housing Demolition.  This report also advises that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision once Development Engineering, Technical Services Division requirements have been satisfied.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2011) Final Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Official Plan, Rezoning, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition Applications at 35-53 and 1-1-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-39877.pdf

Speakers

(June 22, 2011) Adam Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, on behalf of the applicant
(June 22, 2011) Jo-Anne Wortley
(June 22, 2011) Robert Parkes, President, Don Valley East Residents & Ratepayers Assoc. Inc.
(June 22, 2011) Gary Phillips
(June 22, 2011) Terry West, President, Don Mills Residents Inc.
(June 22, 2011) Andreea Anastasiu-Daos
(June 22, 2011) Themi Tsoukas
(June 22, 2011) Glen A. Weaver
(June 22, 2011) Diane P. Rogers
(June 22, 2011) Dan Lim

Communications (Community Council)

(June 8, 2011) E-mail from Elena Deaconu (NY.Main.NY9.46.1)
(June 9, 2011) E-mail from Janie Zekkou (NY.Main.NY9.46.2)
(June 13, 2011) E-mail from Richard Burrows (NY.Main.NY9.46.3)
(June 13, 2011) E-mail from Jo Baumann (NY.Main.NY9.46.4)
(June 14, 2011) E-mail from Dan Covello (NY.Main.NY9.46.5)
(June 19, 2011) E-mail from Shinneen and Corrado Musso (NY.Main.NY9.46.6)
(June 21, 2011) E-mail from Effie Vlachoyannacos, Chair, Board of Directors, Federation of Metro Tenants' Associations (NY.Main.NY9.46.7)
(June 21, 2011) E-mail from Kenneth Hale, Director of Advocacy and Legal Services, Advocacy Centre for Tenants - Ontario (NY.Main.NY9.46.8)
(June 21, 2011) E-mail from Howard Moscoe (NY.Main.NY9.46.9)
(August 21, 2011) E-mail from Andreea Anastasiu-Daos (NY.Main.NY9.46.10)
(June 21, 2011) E-mail from Gary Phillips, on behalf of the citizens on Hockley Place (NY.Main.NY9.46.11)
(June 22, 2011) E-mail from Shauna Cade and Dylan Biemann (NY.Main.NY9.46.12)
(June 22, 2011) E-mail from Husam Sha'ath (NY.Main.NY9.46.13)
(July 12, 2011) Letter from R. J. Parkes, President, RACA, Don Valley East Residents and Ratepayers Inc., submitted by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ward 34 - Don Valley East (NY.Main.NY9.46.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/comm/communicationfile-23794.pdf
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Betty Sproull (NY.New.NY9.46.15)
(September 7, 2011) Fax from Adam Brown, Sherman, Brown, Dryer, Karol Barristers and Solicitors, solicitor for the applicant (NY.New.NY9.46.16)

46a - Staff Report - Official Plan, Zoning By-law, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - 35-53 and 101-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road

Origin
(August 24, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District
Summary

On July 14, 2011, City Council considered a Final Report on a development proposal for the lands at 35-53 and 101-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road which was forwarded to it without recommendations from North York Community Council.  City Council referred these applications back to the North York Community Council with a request that the Director, Community Planning, North York District, submit a further report addressing the issues raised at City Council.  This report addresses Council's direction.

Background Information (Community Council)
(August 24, 2011) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan, Zoning By-law, Draft Plan of Subdivision and Rental Housing Demolition Applications at 35-53 and 101-113 Valley Woods Road and 1213-1229 York Mills Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40192.pdf

NY9.48 - Staff representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 58 Florence Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
Communication NY9.48.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and an outside planner to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the Committee of Adjustment's approval of the minor variances with respect to the interior side yard setbacks.

Origin

(September 12, 2011) Memo from Councillor Filion

Summary

Applications for Consent and Minor Variance were submitted by Aziz Jafari to permit the severance of the subject property into two residential building lots and the construction of a new three-storey dwelling on each of the proposed lots.  Through discussions with City Planning staff, the applicant revised the requested variances with respect to the exterior side yard setbacks and building height, and to eliminate the requested variance for a three-storey dwelling, but left the 0.6 metre interior side yard setbacks unchanged.  On September 7, 2011, the Committee of Adjustment approved the applications, as revised.  The City intends to appeal this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 12, 2011) Member Motion from Councillor Filion on Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 58 Florence Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40725.pdf
(August 30, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Committee of Adjustment Application at 58 Florence Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40726.pdf
(August 30, 2011) Public Hearing Notice on Consent and Minor Variance at 58 Florence Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40727.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(September 18, 2011) E-mail from Peter Clarke (CC.Supp.NY9.48.1)

NY9.49 - Staff representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 197 Cameron Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision for 197 Cameron Avenue.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the Committee of Adjustment's decision for 197 Cameron Avenue.

Origin

(September 12, 2011) Memo from Councillor Filion

Summary

An application for Minor Variance was submitted by Aziz Jafari to permit the construction of a new three storey dwelling with an integral at-grade, two car garage on the above noted property.  The existing dwelling would be demolished.  City Planning staff recommended refusal of the application, on the basis that the height and proposed three storeys, were not in keeping with the prevailing building size and pattern in the neighbourhood.  On July 27, 2011, while the Committee of Adjustment refused the height variance, it approved the other variances, including the variance for a proposed three storey house.  The City of Toronto has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 12, 2011) Member Motion from Councillor Filion on Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 197 Cameron Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40730.pdf
(July 27, 2011) Notice of Decision on Minor Variance Application for 197 Cameron Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40731.pdf

NY9.51 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 41 Saintfield Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and an outside planner to attend at all proceedings before the Ontario Municipal Board pertaining to the appeal of the Committee of Adjustment decision with respect to 41 Saintfield Avenue to uphold the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.

Origin

(September 12, 2011) Memo from Councillor Robinson

Summary

On May 8, 2011, the North York panel of the Committee of Adjustment refused variances pertaining to the application regarding 41 Saintfield Avenue. The applicant was seeking numerous variances.

 

The applicant was requesting approval from the Committee of Adjustment to permit the existing third storey addition within the existing attic space to be maintained as constructed. Also, the proposed is the construction of a two-storey addition to the north west side of the existing dwelling, and converting the existing garage into habitable space.

 

The Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 41 Saintfield Avenue has been slated for Friday, September 23, 2011.

 

This request is made to authorize the City Solicitor and a planner to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the application.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 12, 2011) Memo from Councillor Robinson regarding Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 41 Saintfield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40736.pdf
(May 18, 2011) Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment regarding 41 Saintfield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-40793.pdf

Speakers

Adam Brown, Solicitor, of the law firm of Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, on behalf of the owner of 41 Saintfield Avenue

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 9

SC9.4 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 3250 Finch Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
39 - Scarborough-Agincourt
Attention
Bill 1166 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out in the report (June 29, 2011) from the Fire Chief as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 3250 Finch Avenue East.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and the City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(June 29, 2011) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 29, 2011) Report from Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes - 3250 Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-39482.pdf
Attachment 1 - Amendment of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-39483.pdf

SC9.6 - Assumption of Services - 6363-6405 Kingston Road - Stone Manor Developments (Kingston Road) Limited - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2431

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council assume the services installed for Registered Plan 66M-2431 and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plan of Subdivision.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this development Plan 66M-2431.

 

3.         City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services in Subdivision Plan 66M-2431.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

 

6.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within Plan of Subdivision No. 66M-2431 to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(August 17, 2011) Report from the City Solicitor

Summary

This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the above development.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 17, 2011) Report and Attachment from the City Solicitor - Assumption of Services - 6363-6405 Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40041.pdf

SC9.21 - No Stopping Regulation Study - Progress Avenue West of Midland Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Bill 1121 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the stopping regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (August 12, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council enact the stopping regulations, as identified in Appendix 2 of the report (August 12, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report responds to a concern about the lack of full time stopping regulations on both sides of Progress Avenue, west of Midland Avenue. Transportation staff has confirmed the need for this regulation in order to maintain clear and unobstructed sight-lines to the Pedestrian Traffic Control Signals recently installed on Progress Avenue, approximately 140 metres west of Midland Avenue.

 

It is recommended that Transportation Services install a No Stopping Anytime regulation on both sides of Progress Avenue from Midland Avenue to 202 metres west of Midland Avenue. This prohibition will ensure appropriate sight-lines to the traffic control signals for all approaching motorists and crossing pedestrians.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District on No Stopping Regulation Study at Progress Avenue west of Midland Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40126.pdf
Attachment 3 - Location Plan - Progress Avenue west of Midland Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40127.pdf

SC9.22 - One Way Traffic Lane Designation Study - Warden Avenue and Steeles Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
39 - Scarborough-Agincourt
Attention
Bill 1149 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the one way traffic lane regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (August 12, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report describes the need to enact one-way traffic lane designation by-laws at the signalized intersection on Warden Avenue at Steeles Avenue East.

 

Staff recommends the implementation of a One Way Traffic Lanes by-law (turning movement lanes) for northbound and southbound right-turning traffic at this intersection  to clearly define traffic lane usage. This measure is being recommended to normalize traffic operations and mitigate any conflicting through and turning traffic movements, and augment traffic signal indications.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District on One Way Traffic Lane Designation Study at Warden Avenue and Steeles Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40120.pdf
Attachment 2 - Location Plan - Warden Avenue and Steeles Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40121.pdf

SC9.24 - Stopping Regulation Housekeeping Study - Sheppard Avenue East - Morningside Avenue to Kingston Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 44 - Scarborough East
Attention
Bill 1150 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the parking regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (August 12, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council enact the parking and stopping regulations, as identified in Appendix 2 of the report (August 12, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

Due to the existing bicycle lanes along this portion of Sheppard Ave East, the existing on-street No Parking Anytime regulations need to be rescinded and replaced with a No Stopping Anytime regulation. 

 

City Council’s approval of the No Stopping Anytime regulation amendments will allow enforcement by the Toronto Police Service and improve roadway operation and safety.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Stopping Regulation Housekeeping Study - Sheppard Avenue East - Morningside Avenue to Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40079.pdf
Attachment 3 - Location Plan - Sheppard Avenue East - Morningside Avenue to Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40080.pdf

SC9.25 - Entry Prohibited Housekeeping Study - Driveway Access at 5637 Finch Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bill 1120 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the entry prohibited regulation, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (August 12, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report responds to a concern about the inconsistency between the existing signage and the current municipal by-laws at 5637 Finch Avenue East. Transportation staff has confirmed the need for housekeeping a "No Entry" prohibition by-law. The amended by-law will provide for a safer environment for motorists and allow for enforcement by the Toronto Police Service.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Entry Prohibited Housekeeping Study - Driveway access - 5637 Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40086.pdf
Attachment 2 - Location Plan - Driveway access - 5637 Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40087.pdf

SC9.27 - Pedestrian Refuge Island Review - Lawrence Avenue East and Susan Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
43 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the removal of the Pedestrian Refuge Island on Lawrence Avenue East at Susan Street, subject to the westbound Toronto Transit Commission transit stop on the north side of this intersection being removed.

 

2.         City Council, pursuant to the City of Toronto Act 2006, authorize the appropriate City officials to prepare the necessary Road Alteration By-law.

 

3.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to discuss the feasibility of removing the Pedestrian Refuge Island (PRI) on Lawrence Avenue East at Susan Street.

 

A proposal by the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to remove the westbound bus stop on the north side would render the current PRI unwarranted since most pedestrian demand would disappear.  In addition, this location does not meet the current environmental warrant practice for a PRI due to the location of a seven-lane cross-section at this location.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District on Pedestrian Refuge Island Review at Lawrence Avenue East and Susan Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40174.pdf
Attachment 2 - Location Plan - Lawrence Avenue East and Susan Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40175.pdf

SC9.28 - Traffic Control Signals Study - Old Kingston Road and Morrish Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of Traffic Control Signals at the intersection of Old Kingston Road and Morrish Road.

 

2.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to secure the authority for the installation of Traffic Control Signals at the intersection of Old Kingston Road and Morrish Road.

 

Traffic studies reveal that Traffic Control Signals should be installed to improve safety.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District on Traffic Control Signals Study at Old Kingston Road and Morrish Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40105.pdf
Attachment 1 - Location Plan - Old Kingston Road and Morrish Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40106.pdf

SC9.29 - No Stopping and Permitted Parking Regulations Study - East Avenue and Island Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East
Attention
Bill 1122 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the parking regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (August 12, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council enact the "No Stopping" and "Parking for Restricted Periods" regulations, as identified in Appendix 2 of the report (August 12, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report responds to a concern about on-street parking regulations on East Avenue and Island Road. Transportation Services staff has confirmed the need for no stopping regulations in order to maintain safe and efficient two-way traffic flow, adequate sight lines and roadway maintenance at the south/west corner of East Avenue and Island Road. In addition, a four-hour short-term parking zone is recommended for Island Road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District on No Stopping and Permitted Parking Regulations Study at East Avenue and Island Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40112.pdf
Attachment 3 - Location Plan - East Avenue and Island Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40113.pdf

SC9.32 - 3551 Victoria Park Avenue - Rezoning and Site Plan Applications - Refusal Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
39 - Scarborough-Agincourt
Attention
Communication SC9.32.3 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council refuse the zoning by-law amendment application (file 09 187694 ESC 39 OZ) and site plan application (file 09 187701 ESC 39 OZ) to permit a place of worship for the lands at 3551 Victoria Park Avenue, for the reasons outlined in the report (August 15, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         In the event of an appeal, the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff be authorized to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the applications.

Origin

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

These applications were made after January 1, 2007 and are subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

The applicant has filed a zoning by-law amendment application to permit a place of worship within a listed heritage house located at 3551 Victoria Park Avenue.  The applicant has also filed an application for site plan approval.  The Islamic Society of Willowdale has been operating a place of worship at this location for approximately 4 years and is seeking permission to legalize the use.

 

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the applications to amend the zoning by-law and for site plan approval for the reasons outlined in this report including:

 

a.         the applicant has not provided an adequate number of parking spaces to serve the proposed use; and,

 

b.         the proposal constitutes overdevelopment of the site.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 15, 2011) Report and Attachments 1 to 4 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3551 Victoria Park Avenue - Rezoning and Site Plan Applications - Refusal Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40071.pdf

Speakers

Jim Qureshi

Communications (Community Council)

(August 30, 2011) Letter from Councillor Shelley Carroll (SC.Main.SC9.32.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/comm/communicationfile-24491.pdf
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Byron Alvares (SC.Main.SC9.32.2)

Communications (City Council)

(September 21, 2011) E-mail from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners, LLP (CC.New.SC9.32.3)

SC9.33 - 29 Meadowvale Road - Green Roof By-law Complete Exemption Request Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council refuse the request for complete exemption of the green roof requirement for the lands at 29 Meadowvale Road.

Origin

(August 23, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

An application has been made by the Conseil Scolaire de District Catholique Centre Sud for a complete exemption from the requirements of By-law 583-2009, Chapter 492, Green Roofs, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code at 29 Meadowvale Road which mandates the provision of green roofs.

 

This report reviews and recommends either approval or refusal of the complete exemption request.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 23, 2011) Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District on Green Roof By-law Complete Exemption Request Report at 29 Meadowvale Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40134.pdf

SC9.34 - Hydro Corridor Lands Immediately North of 2761 Markham Road - Rezoning Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Tapscott Employment District (West) Zoning By-law for the lands immediately north of 2761 Markham Road substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendment attached as Attachment 4 to the report (August 18, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bill for enactment, City Council require the owner to:

 

a.         submit a site plan application to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District; and

 

b.         provide staff with a copy of a lease agreement between the applicant and Hydro for the use of the subject lands. This agreement must be to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 12, 2011, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 18, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application was made after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

This application proposes to permit 71 ancillary parking spaces on the hydro lands located immediately to the north of 2761 Markham Road.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the zoning by-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 18, 2011) Report and Attachments 1 to 4 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 2761 Markham Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40117.pdf

Speakers

Vish Jayaraman

Communications (Community Council)

(August 26, 2011) Letter from Ann Newman, Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (SC.New.SC9.34.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/comm/communicationfile-24017.pdf

SC9.35 - 232 and 234 Galloway Road - Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
43 - Scarborough East

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 232 and 234 Galloway Road, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 of the report (August 16, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 12, 2011, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 16, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application was made after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

The draft plan of common elements condominium application (10 133640 ESC 43 CD) proposes to provide legal access to the individual garages of 16 townhouse dwelling units, and ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the driveway, six visitor parking spaces, and landscaped areas, as well as the provision of waste collection services, by the condominium corporation at 232 and 234 Galloway Road.

 

The development is currently under construction and nearing completion.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the subject application.

Background Information (Community Council)

Report and Attachments 1-3 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 232 and 234 Galloway Road - Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40065.pdf

SC9.36 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 10 Marilyn Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
39 - Scarborough-Agincourt

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment decision regarding 10 Marilyn Avenue.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Letter from Councillor Del Grande

Summary

Request to authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the appeal and uphold the decision of the Scarborough Committee of Adjustment.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Letter from Councillor Del Grande - OMB Hearing - 10 Marilyn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-39934.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision B014/11SC
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-39936.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision A074/11SC
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-39937.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision A075/11SC
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-39938.pdf

SC9.37 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 140 Westbourne Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and relevant staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decisions regarding the consent and minor variance applications at 140 Westbourne Avenue.

Origin

(September 9, 2011) Letter from Councillor Berardinetti

Summary

Request to authorize the City Solicitor and relevant staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the appeal and uphold the decision made by the Committee of Adjustment, Scarborough Panel,  regarding the variance application at 140 Westbourne Avenue (File B018/11SC, A084/11SC & A085/11SC).

Background Information (Community Council)

Letter from Councillor Berardinetti - OMB Hearing - 140 Westbourne Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40623.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision A084/11SC
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40672.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision A085/11SC
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40673.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision B018/11SC
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40674.pdf

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 9

TE9.1 - Renaming of a Part of the Public Highway Carroll Street to Thompson Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor to name part of the public highway Carroll Street as Thompson Street, described as follows:

 

1.         Certain land described by W. Kowalenko, City Surveyor, as follows, namely:

 

            Part of PIN 21073-0166 (LT)

            Parts of Lots 26, 27 and 28 on Plan 347 Riverdale designated as PART 2 on Plan 66R-24877

 

            City of Toronto Province of Ontario

            Land Titles Division of the Toronto Registry Office (No. 66)

 

            is renamed "Thompson Street". 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the City Surveyor, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on the implications of renaming one of the remaining portions of Carroll Street, that have been bisected by the new parkland.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on September 12, 2011, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's web site.  No one appeared before the Community Council.

Origin

(August 25, 2011) Draft By-law from the City Solicitor

Summary

Draft By-law to rename part of the public highway Carroll Street as Thompson Street.

Background Information (Community Council)

Draft By-law from the City Solicitor - Renaming Part of Carroll Street as Thompson Street - TE34.45
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40396.pdf

TE9.4 - Supplementary Report - 56 Blue Jays Way - Zoning By-law Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law 849-2010, attached as Attachment 1, to the report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, dated August 15, 2011, for the lands at 56 Blue Jays Way, with the following amendments:

 

a.         Section 1 clause (d) i) be amended by deleting the words "the temporary relocation on the lot" and replacing them with the words "any temporary relocation of the heritage façade within the adjacent City right of way"; and

 

b.         Section 2 subsection (e) be amended by deleting "any temporary relocation of the heritage façade on the lot" and replacing it with "any temporary relocation of the heritage façade within the adjacent City right of way".

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary bill for enactment, City Council authorize City officials and require the owner to execute agreements to amend both the existing Section 37 Agreement and the existing Heritage Easement Agreement  for 56 Blue Jays Way, to the satisfaction of  the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor, with such agreements to be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to reflect the changes as described in this report, including a revised Conservation Plan and letter of credit to reflect any increases, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

4.         In addition to the matters required in Recommendation 3 of the report (August 15, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, headed "Supplementary Report - 56 Blue Jays Way - Zoning By-law Amendment", and Recommendation 1a.  in the letter (September 7, 2011)  from the Toronto Preservation Board  (Item TE9.5a), and before introducing the necessary bill for enactment, City Council require the City Solicitor to be satisfied that the owner has obtained both approval in writing from Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, for the temporary relocation of the heritage façade to City property abutting the subject property, and approval in writing from the General Manager, Transportation Services, or Toronto and East York Community Council, for construction staging on Blue Jays Way.

 

5.         City Council determine that no further notice be given respecting the revisions to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment set out in Recommendation 1.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 12, 2011, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The lands at 56 Blue Jays Way were rezoned in 2007 (By-law 1067-2007) to permit an 18-storey building.  The lands were subsequently rezoned in 2010 (By-law 849-2010) to permit a 41-storey mixed use building at 56 Blue Jays Way.  Amongst other matters, the rezoning required an amendment to the existing Heritage Easement Agreement registered on the site to address the revised proposal and permitted alterations, the submission of a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, a securing letter of credit and restoration of the heritage façade.  The approvals of both the 2007 and 2010 rezonings required the heritage façade to be retained intact, in situ (in place) and not disassembled.   Additionally, other Section 37 benefits and related Section 37Agreements were required for both rezonings.

 

This report recommends amendments to Zoning By-law 849-2010 and the Section 37 Agreement in order to allow the retained eastern façade  (the "Heritage Façade") of the Diesel Theatre to be temporarily relocated within the site during the construction of the building (the building allowed under By-law 849-2010).  The Heritage Façade would be returned to its original location, integrated into the new building and restored prior to completion of the redevelopment and, in any event, prior to any portion of the new building being used for any commercial or residential purpose.  The requirement that the Heritage Façade be retained intact and not disassembled remains unchanged.  Amendments to the Heritage Easement Agreement and related Conservation Plan are also required and will be addressed in a report on the alteration of the designated property from Heritage Preservation Services staff being prepared for the September 7, 2011 meeting of the Toronto Preservation Board.

 

With the exception of the temporary relocation of the Heritage Façade and the requirement for a revised Conservation Plan, an amended Heritage Easement Agreement and an appropriate letter of credit to secure the relocation and return of such façade, the redevelopment and the Section 37 contributions remain unchanged.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 56 Blue Jays Way - Zoning By-law Amendment - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40013.pdf

Speakers

Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol

TE9.5 - Alteration to a Designated Heritage Property and Amendment to a Heritage Easement Agreement - 56 Blue Jays Way

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consent to the alteration of the designated heritage property at 56 Blue Jays Way, including the temporary relocation, reinstallation and restoration of the heritage façade (east elevation) of the building, subject to the following terms and conditions:

 

a.         Prior to the introduction of the Bill in Council for the zoning amendment, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the City to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for 56 Blue Jays Way, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor, with the amended agreement to be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor to reflect the changes as described in this report, including a revised Conservation Plan for the temporary relocation of the heritage façade to the City right of way, reinstallation to its current location and restoration of the east (primary) elevation of the George Crookshank House, in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by E.R.A. Architects Inc., dated May 19, 2011, and an estimate of costs to reflect any restoration increases, shoring and protective measures, all of which shall be satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         Prior to final Site Plan Approval, the owner shall provide site plan drawings to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c.         Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, including a permit for  alteration to the building, any structure on the subject property, and including any permit for shoring or excavation on the subject property, or any portion of such property:

 

                        i.          the related zoning by-law amendment shall be in full force and effect;

 

ii.         the owner shall have obtained approval from Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, for the temporary relocation of the heritage façade to City property abutting the subject property;

 

iii.        the owner shall have obtained approval from the General  Manager, Transportation Services or Community Council, for construction staging on Blue Jays Way and shall have satisfied all terms and conditions as may be required;

 

iv.        the owner shall have submitted site plan drawings satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division (the Chief Planner)  and shall have  received a Notice of Approval Conditions (NOAC) for Site Plan Control from the Chief Planner;

 

v.         the owner shall have provided written confirmation of their agreement to all of the conditions contained in the NOAC, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner;

 

vi.        the owner shall have satisfied all pre-approval site plan conditions contained within the NOAC, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner; and

 

vii.       the owner shall provide a Letter of Credit in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to secure the temporary relocation, re-installation and all restoration work contained in the approved Conservation Plan.

 

              d.       Prior to any above grade permit issuing pursuant to s. 8 of the Building Code Act:

 

i.          Site Plan Approval shall have been issued by and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

ii.         the owner shall submit final plans and drawings to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

e.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Recommendation 1.c.vii, the owner shall provide a Letter of Substantial completion for the re-installation and restoration work, signed by the project architect and heritage consultant, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council grant authority for the City Solicitor to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council to amend the Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(August 17, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council consent to the alteration of a designated heritage property, comprised of the temporary relocation, re-installation within a new building permitted by By-law 849-2010 and restoration of an existing historic façade located at 56 Blue Jays Way, subject to a number of conditions, and authorize the amendment of a Heritage Easement Agreement (HEA) currently in force between the City and the property owners to allow for this revised conservation strategy.

 

The former George Crookshank House (56 Blue Jays Way) was designated by Toronto City Council under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act on December, 2007 (By-law 1362-2007). A pre-existing HEA was registered on November 21, 1996 that protected the east wall façade of the then listed property, and permitted alterations and development at a compatible scale.

 

The lands at 56 Blue Jays Way were rezoned in 2007 (By-law 1067-2007) to permit an 18 storey building. The lands were subsequently rezoned in 2010 (By-law 849-2010) to permit a 41-storey mixed use building at 56 Blue Jays Way. Amongst other matters, the rezoning required an amendment to the existing HEA to address the revised proposal and permitted alterations, the submission of a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and a securing letter of credit for the restoration of the heritage façade. 

 

The proposals in both the 2007 and 2010 rezonings required the heritage façade to be retained intact, in situ (in place) and not disassembled during the construction phase of a new development.  However, a recent engineering study prepared by the owner has necessitated a change to the approved conservation strategy which had formed a part of the site's zoning requirements. It is now proposed that the heritage façade be temporarily relocated within the site during construction.  The heritage façade will then be returned to its original location, reinstalled within the new building and be fully restored (Heritage Impact Assessment submitted by E.R.A. Architects Inc., dated May 19, 2011).  The current requirement that the heritage façade be incorporated into the east wall façade of the proposed building remains unchanged.

 

Council's consent is required for both the alteration to the designated heritage property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and the amendment to the registered HEA that will include necessary changes to the Conservation Strategy and the Letter of Credit together with the updating of certain of the HEA provisions. 

 

This report is being brought forward at the same time as a Supplementary report for the Zoning By-law Amendment from the Director, Community Planning for the subject property.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 17, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division - Alteration to a Designated Heritage Property and Amendment to a Heritage Easement Agreement - 56 Blue Jays Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40053.pdf

Speakers

Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol

5a - Alteration to a Designated Heritage Property and Amendment to a Heritage Easement Agreement - 56 Blue Jays Way

Origin
(September 7, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on September 7, 2011, considered the report (August 17, 2011) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting Alteration to a Designated Heritage Property and Amendment to a Heritage Easement Agreement - 56 Blue Jays Way.

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

-           Michael McClelland, E.R.A. Architects Inc.
-           Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers and Solicitors.

Background Information (Community Council)
(September 7, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alteration to a Designated Heritage Property and Amendment to a Heritage Easement Agreement - 56 Blue Jays Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40679.pdf
(September 6, 2011) Letter from Michael McClelland, Principal, E.R.A. Architects Inc. - Alteration to a Designated Heritage Property and Amendment to a Heritage Easement Agreement - 56 Blue Jays Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40680.pdf

TE9.6 - Final Report - 68 Merton Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 68 Merton Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report dated August 15, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 68 Merton Street (the subject of this report) to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to be registered on title as follows:

 

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are:

 

i.          a payment of $400,000.00 (indexed to inflation) which will be payable prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Such payment will be directed to the Planning Act Reserve Fund to be used for improvements to the Kay Gardner Beltline Park and/or Oriole Park or other local area park improvements.

 

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.          The owner shall construct and pay for any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report as accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure is required to support this development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on September 12, 2011, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit construction of a 13-storey, 143-unit residential condominium with below-grade parking for the residents and their visitors at 68 Merton Street.

 

This report recommends approval of the proposed development based on its planning and design attributes which include:

 

a          the proposed development maintains adequate sunlight for residents in adjacent buildings and at pedestrian level on Merton Street;

 

b.         the inclusion of grade-related units on Merton Street will assist in the integration of the proposed building into the local neighbourhood context;

 

c.         the site is within a few blocks of the Davisville subway station and, as a result, has excellent transit connections to most points within the City;

 

d.         the site is on Merton Street and is in proximity to retail shops, services, entertainment and places of employment found on Yonge Street and Mount Pleasant Road; and

 

e.         the Section 37 benefits that would be secured as a result of approval and construction of this development including improvements to the Kay Gardner Beltline Park and to Oriole Park or other local area park improvements.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 68 Merton Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-39880.pdf

Speakers

Cyndi Rottenberg Walker, Urban Strategies Inc.

TE9.7 - Request for Direction Report - 41 Ossington Avenue - Zoning Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner, in consultation with the City Solicitor and Ward Councillor, to continue negotiations with the applicant for 41 Ossington Avenue with the goal of achieving a settlement that meets the recommended setbacks and stepbacks described in the report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District dated August 17, 2011.

 

2.         In the event that staff and the applicant are unable to reach a satisfactory settlement, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to oppose the applicants' appeal respecting the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 41 Ossington Avenue (File Number 10 266103 STE 19 OZ) and to attend any Ontario Municipal Board Hearings in opposition to such appeal.

 

3.         City Council request the Chief Planner to bring forward a site specific Official Plan amendment for 41 Ossington Avenue to address technical Official Plan issues should the application be approved by the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Origin

(August 17, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a five-storey condominium building, having ground floor retail, fronting Ossington Avenue and 6 four-storey townhouse units fronting Rebecca Street.  A total of 25 residential units are proposed between the condominium and townhouses, with 21 parking spaces to be provided. Sixteen parking spaces will be situated on a parking stacker located in the middle and east portion of the townhouses at 41 Ossington Avenue.

 

This report advises Council that the applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law amendment and Site Plan application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and seeks direction regarding representation at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing and negotiations with the applicant to resolve the issues identified in this report.

 

The proposed 5-storey condominium building fronting Ossington Avenue is acceptable; however, the proposed townhouses represents over development in its current form particularly with regard to setbacks. The approval of the townhouse component of this proposal in its current form would set a negative precedent for future development that undermines the City's Official Plan Neighbourhoods policies and compromises the quality of the development. The location of the proposed parking stackers servicing the mixed use condominium in the Neighbourhood portion of the site will require an Official Plan amendment.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, staff would support an Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment if the applicant is agreeable to the changes to the rear yard setbacks/stepbacks identified in this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 17, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 41 Ossington Avenue - Zoning Amendment - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40018.pdf

Speakers

Craig Hunter, Armstrong Hunter and Associates

Communications (Community Council)

(September 9, 2011) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (TE.Supp.TE9.7.1)

TE9.10 - Request for Direction Report - 11 Charlotte Street - Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board, and to hire any appropriate consultants in support of the applicants' appeal respecting the zoning by-law amendment and site plan applications for 11 Charlotte Street on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, dated-stamped July 6, 2011 (File Numbers: 10 317203 STE 20 OZ and 10 317208 STE 20 SA) provided that the matters set out in Recommendation 2a and b. are satisfied.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to also advise the OMB that City’s Council’s position is that any redevelopment of the site at 11 Charlotte Street, if approved by the OMB, should:

 

a.         secure services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be required by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, as follows:

 

i.          $100,000, prior to adoption of bills, for capital to improve Toronto Arts Council arts space within Ward 20 (not for Toronto Arts Council Administrative office space).

 

ii.         $100,000, prior to first building permit, for capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing projects within Ward 20; and

 

iii         $800,000 prior to first building permit, for John Street Revitalization; and

 

b.         satisfy the Chief Planner and Executive Director with respect to site plan matters, including the approval of plans and drawings and site plan conditions.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Origin

(August 19, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application was made after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the changes to the Planning Act that came into effect on that date and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan applications for 11 Charlotte Street to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council’s failure to make a decision on the application within the time allotted by the Planning Act.

 

The application proposes a 32-storey building (103 metres plus 9.5 metre mechanical feature) at 11 Charlotte Street, midblock within an area of low-scale warehouse buildings.  The proposal consists of 232 residential units, commercial/retail space on the main level, and provides 65 parking spaces within four levels of underground parking.

 

The proposal, in its current format, does not meet criteria with respect to height, scale, and massing, and does not meet the intent of the Zoning By-law with respect to height, building setbacks, residential amenity space, and minimum parking requirements for residents and visitors.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council’s direction for the City Solicitor, together with Planning and appropriate City Staff to oppose the proposal at the OMB.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 19, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 11 Charlotte Street - Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40090.pdf

Speakers

Peter Clewes, Architects Alliance
Kim Kovar, Aird and Berlis
David Beasley

TE9.11 - Request for Direction Report - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council support the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications submitted for 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West in principle on the terms and for the reasons outlined in the report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District dated August 15, 2011.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and necessary staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board to present the position set out in this report, as required.

 

3.         City Council authorize staff to continue to work with the applicant to resolve any outstanding issues related to requirements of Technical Services and Heritage Preservation Services, and report directly to Council, if necessary, to obtain revised direction prior to the Ontario Municipal Board hearing.

 

4.         City Council authorize staff to take any necessary action to give effect to the above recommendations.

Origin

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application was made prior to January 1, 2007 and is not subject to the changes to the Planning Act that came into effect on that date or the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

This application proposes a 4-storey commercial building with a rear 4-storey parking structure at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West.  The proposal will have an overall density of approximately 2.9 times the lot area.

 

The purpose of this report is to obtain Council direction in connection with appeals before the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-39899.pdf

Speakers

Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol

TE9.12 - Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consent to the demolition of the designated property at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West, subject to the following terms and conditions:

 

a.         Prior to the Ontario Municipal Board issuing an Order for final approval of the zoning amendment and site plan approval, the owner shall:

 

i.          Enter into and register a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the heritage property located at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor.

 

ii.         Provide a detailed Conservation Plan, satisfactory to the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that:

 

a.   details the dismantling, storage and rebuilding of the south and west elevations of the Loblaw Groceteria Building in accordance with the November 2010 Heritage Impact Assessment and Synopsis of Dismantling Rationale document prepared by E.R.A. Architects Inc. and dated March 2011, and that includes documentation through photographs of the as-found condition of the heritage structure, detailed Landscape Plan, an exterior Lighting Plan, Signage Plan and Interpretative Plan.

 

b.   includes a detailed cost estimate with descriptions and specifications for the work for the purpose of an indexed Letter of Credit to be secured within the Heritage Easement Agreement.

 

b.         Prior to the Ontario Municipal Board issuing an Order for final Site Plan Approval, the owner shall prepare and provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

 

i.          a revised site plan and drawings that include revisions in accordance with comments from Heritage Preservation Services dated August 11, 2011;

 

ii.         a detailed Landscape Plan that supports the architectural style of the heritage building including reference to materials and finishes;

 

iii.        a Lighting Plan including building and site lighting;

 

iv.        a Signage Plan including building and site signage;

 

v.         an Interpretation Plan including interpretive elements regarding the property's heritage values, site history and archaeological resources as may be applicable, an implementation schedule and a budget; and

 

vi.        a record of the as-found condition of the building including architectural drawings and photographs keyed to plans and elevations of all visible interiors and exteriors.

 

c.         Provide an updated Stage 1 Archaeological Assessment report as an addendum to the original report.

 

d.         Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the proposal, including a heritage permit related to demolition, shoring, excavation and rebuilding of any building or structure on the subject property:

 

i.          the owner shall have received final approval for the zoning amendment and final site plan approval; and

 

ii.         the owner shall provide a Letter of Credit, in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure all work including the implementation of the approved Conservation Plan, including the Signage Plan, Lighting Plan and Interpretation Plan.

 

e.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall:

 

i.          implement the Conservation Plan, including the Interpretation Plan, Lighting Plan and Signage Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

ii.         provide a Letter of Substantial Completion for the rebuild of the south and west walls signed by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council require the owner to withdraw its appeal of the demolition permit currently before the Board and in the event that the owner does not withdraw its appeal of the demolition permit on the basis of Council’s proposed consent on the terms and conditions specified in Recommendation 1, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board dismiss the appeal or that identical terms and conditions be required in any Order of the Board requiring that the municipality consent to the demolition or removal of a building or structure pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its order on zoning amendment and site plan approval pending being advised by the City Solicitor of completion of the requirements set out in Recommendation 1a.

 

4.         City Council grant authority for execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement to secure heritage matters related to 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West under section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act and authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council.

Origin

(August 16, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council consent to the demolition and partial reconstruction of the designated heritage property located at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West (Attachment 1).  As this property is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, Council consent is required for the proposed demolition.  The current application is not subject to the 90-day decision period set out in the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

This report relates to the rezoning and site plan approval applications received by City Planning in connection with a new Loblaw facility to be located at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West.  The original 2004/2005 proposal for the alteration of the heritage building, including the retention and restoration of the south and west façades in situ, is currently before the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  Subject to certain conditions, Heritage Preservation staff supported the proposal as set out in a report of the Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, dated October 6, 2005.

 

The modified proposal of 2010, which will potentially form the basis of a settlement at the OMB, now contemplates the demolition of the entire building with provision for the reconstruction of the entire south and west walls using new and salvaged materials.  The two reconstructed walls will be anchored on new construction and will not be integral to the structure of the new facility.   Subject to satisfaction of certain conditions and subject to certain revisions to the site plans and drawings, Heritage Preservation Staff have no objection in principle to the zoning amendment or site plan approval for the revised proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 16, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40058.pdf

Speakers

Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol

12a - Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West

Origin
(September 7, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on September 7, 2011, considered the report (August 16, 2011) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West.

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

-           Michael McClelland, E.R.A. Architects Inc.
-           Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers and Solicitors.

Background Information (Community Council)
(September 7, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40681.pdf

TE9.13 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 111 St. Clair Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 111 St. Clair Avenue West (Imperial Oil Building) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

2.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4          If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

5.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owners of the property at 111 St. Clair Avenue West for the property at 111 St. Clair Avenue West.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary Bill in Council

authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(August 18, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 111 St. Clair Avenue West (Imperial Oil Building) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and to authorize the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement between the City and the property owners.

 

The property at 111 St. Clair Avenue West, which is located on the south side of the street, east of Avenue Road, contains the former headquarters of the Imperial Oil Company (now Imperial Oil Limited).  City Council listed the site on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties in February 2005.

 

The property is the subject of a development application that proposes to convert the former office building for use as a residential condominium.  The proposal retains the heritage building and involves minor alterations to the rooftop penthouse and window openings.  The property owners have agreed to the designation of the site under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City of Toronto.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 18, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 111 St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40063.pdf

Speakers

Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol

13a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 111 St. Clair Avenue West

Origin
(September 7, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on September 7, 2011, considered the report (August 18, 2011) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement -111 St. Clair Avenue West.

Background Information (Community Council)
(September 7, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 111 St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40677.pdf

TE9.14 - Alterations to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 399-403 King Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the alterations to the heritage buildings at 399-403 King Street East substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) for 399-403 King Street East revised May 16, 2011, and Addendum No. 1 dated June 14, 2011, prepared by E.R.A. Architects Inc., and Plans  No. A1.1, A2.1, A2.2, A3.1 and A4.1, dated June 17, 2011, prepared by du Toit Architects Ltd. on file with the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         Prior to final site plan approval, the owner shall provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

 

i.          a detailed Conservation Plan for the conservation work described in the HIA, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, detailing recommended interventions and conservation work, a plan for repair and retention of existing fabric, reproduction or restoration of missing or damaged elements, repair of masonry and parging, and estimated costs for all conservation work including the fabrication of a Heritage Toronto plaque;

 

ii.         a comprehensive structural analysis by a qualified engineer with heritage conservation experience confirming retention of the north, east and west walls in situ during construction;

 

iii.        final site plans and drawings, including the detailed landscape plan;

 

iv.        a Letter of Credit in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure the heritage conservation work and Heritage Toronto plaque in accordance with the estimated costs included in the Conservation Plan.

 

b.         Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the heritage buildings located at 399-403 King Street East, the owner shall provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

 

i.          building permit drawings including detailed descriptions/specifications for the proposed heritage conservation work.

 

c.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall;

 

i.          complete the heritage conservation work satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

ii.         provide a Letter of Completion for the conservation work signed by the project architect and heritage consultant.

 

2.         City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 399-403 King Street East under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize

the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation

Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the properties.

Origin

(August 16, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve proposed alterations to the heritage properties at 399-403 King Street East.  The report also recommends that City Council designate these properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their cultural heritage value.

 

These three listed heritage properties are owned by Little Trinity Church and it is proposed to partially restore and rehabilitate the buildings for reuse as a community centre.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 16, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 399-403 King Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40055.pdf

14a - Alterations to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 399-403 King Street East

Origin
(September 7, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on September 7, 2011, considered the report (August 16, 2011) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting Alterations to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 399-403 King Street East.

Background Information (Community Council)
(September 7, 2011) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Heritage Property and Intention to Designate, Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 399-403 King Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40678.pdf

TE9.38 - Assumption of Roads and Services - Ambercroft Construction Ltd. - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2377 - North of Gerrard Street East and East of Main Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council assume the services installed for Registered Plan 66M-2377 and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plan of Subdivision, located on lands on the north side of Gerrard Street East, east of Main Street.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Director, Development Engineering to release the performance guarantee held with respect to this subdivision.

 

3.         City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highways and municipal services in Plan of Subdivision 66M-2377.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any releases or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

 

6.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within Plan 66M-2377 to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Development Engineering

Summary

This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the roads and services with respect to Phase 1 of a subdivision located on lands on the north side of Gerrard Street East, east of Main Street and known as 2230-2264 Gerrard Street East.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Director, Development Engineering - Assumption of Roads and Services - Ambercroft Construction Ltd. - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2377 - North of Gerrard Street East and East of Main Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40345.pdf
(August 12, 2011) Attachment 1 - Assumption of Roads and Services - Ambercroft Construction Ltd. - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2377 - North of Gerrard Street East and East of Main Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40435.pdf

TE9.41 - Road Alteration and Lane Designation - Eglinton Avenue West and W.R. Allen Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1131 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the widening of W. R. Allen Road (northbound on-ramp) from Eglinton Avenue West to a point 147.6 metres north, and the narrowing of Eglinton Avenue West from a point 5.0 meters east of W. R. Allen Road (northbound on-ramp) to a point 40.0 metres further east, generally as shown on Drawing Nos. 421G -0329 and 421G-0330, dated April 2011, attached to this report from the Acting Director of Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, dated August 12, 2011.

 

2.         City Council rescind the designation for the northerly westbound lane on Eglinton Avenue West, between the W.R. Allen Road northbound Ramp and the west curb line of Glenarden Road, for westbound right-turning vehicles (buses excepted). 

 

3.         City Council approve the designation of the two northerly westbound lanes on Eglinton Avenue West, between W.R. Allen Road Northbound Ramp and a point 85 metres east, for right-turning vehicles only.

Origin

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council for a road alteration by-law to widen W. R. Allen Road (northbound on-ramp), from Eglinton Avenue West to a point 147.6 metres north.  Also, Eglinton Avenue West would be narrowed from a point 5.0 metres east of W. R. Allen Road (northbound on-ramp) to a point 40.0 metres further east.

 

The proposed road construction and lane designation will provide for a double westbound right-turn lane from Eglinton Avenue West to the northbound W.R. Allen Road. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 12, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Road Alteration and Lane Designation - Eglinton Avenue West and W.R. Allen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40377.pdf
Drawing Nos. 421G-0329 and 421G-0330 - Road Alteration and Lane Designation - Eglinton Avenue West and W.R. Allen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-39921.pdf

TE9.42 - Road Alterations, Transit Lanes, Access Restrictions and Traffic Regulations - Cherry Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 1130 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the alteration of Cherry Street, from King Street East to the railway overpass north of Lake Shore Boulevard East, to allow for the construction of a transit right-of-way along the east side of the roadway, a single vehicle and bicycle lane in each direction with turning lanes at the intersections, a median dividing the transit lanes from the vehicle and bicycle lanes, wider pedestrian sidewalks, and a centre median, transit loop and pedestrian plaza south of Mill Street, generally as shown in the Drawing Nos. 421G-0255, 421G-0256, 421G 0257 and 421G-0258, dated February 2011 and attached to the report from the Acting Director of Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District dated August 15, 2011.

 

2.         City Council prohibit all vehicular access between Cherry Street and all the properties on the east side of Cherry Street between King Street East and 120 metres south of Mill Street, commencing at the time that construction of the transit right-of-way on Cherry Street begins.

 

3.         City Council rescind the all-way stop control currently in effect at the intersections of Cherry Street and Front Street East, and Cherry Street and Mill Street, commencing at such time as the traffic control signals are installed at the intersection.

 

4.         City Council rescind the traffic regulations currently in effect on Cherry Street between Mill Street and Lake Shore Boulevard East as detailed in Appendix A attached to the report from the Acting Director of Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District dated August 15, 2011 commencing at such time as streetcar service on Cherry Street begins.

 

5.         City Council approve the traffic regulations to introduce transit lanes, a 40 km/h speed limit, turn prohibitions and stopping regulations as detailed in Appendix B attached to the report from the Acting Director of Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District dated August 15, 2011 at such time as streetcar service on Cherry Street begins.

Origin

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

In July 2011, City Council adopted the Executive Committee report "Leases, Licences and Land Transfers for West Don Lands and 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games Athletes' Village" (June 6, 2011), which enabled the conveyance of certain closed streets and lanes to Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation and specific leases and licences to support the redevelopment of the West Don Lands Precinct and the construction of the Pan /Parapan Athletes' Village.

 

The reconstruction of Cherry Street will be completed by the Province in conjunction with the construction of the Athletes' Village. It is an integrated road reconstruction, transit, cycling and pedestrian design developed through comprehensive community involvement. City Council approved the Environmental Assessment study for construction of a transit right-of-way on Cherry Street in 2008.

 

This staff report is the next step in the efforts of the Province and the City to facilitate the  construction of the Village and its related infrastructure in conjunction with the 2015 project completion date.

 

The  design of Cherry Street, between King Street East and Lake Shore Boulevard East includes the construction of a transit right-of-way extension for the King Street streetcar line along the east side of the roadway, a single vehicle and bicycle lane in each direction with turning lanes at the intersections, a median dividing the transit lanes from the vehicle and bicycle lanes, wider pedestrian sidewalks, and a centre median, transit loop and pedestrian plaza south of Mill Street.  All access to and from the properties on the east side of Cherry Street will be restricted except at the signalized intersections of Eastern Avenue, Front Street East, and Mill Street.

 

Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council for the necessary road alterations, access restrictions, and traffic regulations to enable implementation of this project in 2011 and 2012.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Road Alterations, Transit Lanes, Access Restrictions and Traffic Regulations - Cherry Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40275.pdf
Drawing and Appendices - Road Alterations, Transit Lanes, Access Restrictions and Traffic Regulations - Cherry Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40276.pdf

TE9.47 - Parking Amendments - Roncesvalles Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Bills 1141 and 1142 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the amendments to parking regulations as identified in Appendices A and B attached to the report dated August 3, 2011, and entitled "Parking Amendments - Roncesvalles Avenue", from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(August 3, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to implement more stringent "No Stopping Anytime" regulations at several locations on Roncesvalles Avenue, between The Queensway/Queen Street West and Dundas Street West to ensure that streetcar operations at the trackside loading platforms remain unobstructed and that cyclists have clear access onto and across the transit loading platforms.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 3, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Parking Amendments - Roncesvalles Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40368.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0395 - Appendices A and B - Parking Amendments - Roncesvalles Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-39913.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(September 9, 2011) Letter from Keith Denning, Coordinator, Roncesvalles Village BIA (TE.Supp.TE9.47.1)

TE9.52 - Pay and Display Parking Amendments - Liberty Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1147 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the regulation authorizing the operation of parking machines from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday for a maximum period of 3 hours at a rate of $2.00 per hour, on the south side of Liberty Street, from Atlantic Avenue and Hanna Avenue.

 

2.         City Council authorize the operation of parking machines from 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday; and from 1:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. Sunday for a maximum period of 3 hours at a rate of $2.00 per hour on the south side of Liberty Street, from Atlantic Avenue and Hanna Avenue.

Origin

(August 3, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to amend the current pay-and-display parking hours of operation on Liberty Street.

 

Transportation Services has been requested by the Toronto Parking Authority to report on amending the current pay parking hours of operation on Liberty Street in order to coordinate with pay parking hours of operation, duration of parking and parking rates found within the surrounding Liberty Village area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 3, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Pay and Display Parking Amendments - Liberty Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-39888.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0393 - Pay and Display Parking Amendments - Liberty Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-39889.pdf

TE9.58 - Reduction of Motor Coach Parking Zone - Richmond Street West, North Side, Between York Street and Bay Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 1146 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the "Bus Loading Zone" regulation, currently in place on the north side of Richmond Street West, between a point 89 metres east of York Street and a point 121 metres further east, which permits buses to park from 6:30 p.m. of one day to 7:30 a.m. of the next following day, Monday to Friday and anytime Saturday, Sunday and Public Holidays, to be in effect between a point 89 metres east of York Street and a point 85 metres further east.

 

2.         City Council amend the "no parking anytime" regulation currently in place on the north side of Richmond Street West, between a point 89 metres east of York Street and a point 121 metres further east, to be in effect between a point 89 metres east of York Street and a point 85 metres further east.

 

3.         City Council designate a “Delivery Vehicle Parking Zone” and restrict parking of delivery vehicles within this "Delivery Vehicle Parking Zone" to a maximum duration of 30 minutes, from 9:30 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., and from 6:30 p.m. of one day to 7:30 a.m. of the next following day, Monday to Friday and at all times Saturday, Sunday and Public Holidays, on the north side of Richmond Street West, from a point 174 metres east of York Street to a point 36 metres further east.

Origin

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is seeking authority to reduce the size of the motor coach parking zone located on the north side of Richmond Street West, between York Street and Bay Street.  This zone allows buses to park from 6:30 p.m. of one day to 7:30 a.m. of the next following day, Monday to Friday and anytime Saturday, Sunday and Public Holidays.

 

We are recommending that the motor coach parking zone be reduced by 36 metres.  The proposed reduction in the length of the motor coach parking area will result in a clear and unobstructed curb side area for loading and unloading opportunities for Premises No. 80 Richmond Street West and improve sightlines for pedestrians.  This change will reduce the number of available bus parking spaces by at least one, however, it should not impact significantly on motor coach operations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 15, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Reduction of Motor Coach Parking Zone - Richmond Street West, North Side, Between York Street and Bay Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40375.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0422 - Reduction of Motor Coach Parking Zone - Richmond Street West, North Side, Between York Street and Bay Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40421.pdf

TE9.65 - Pedestrian Zones - Gould Street/Victoria Street, and Willcocks Street - Maintenance Agreements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
20 - Trinity-Spadina, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize staff to extend the existing agreement with Ryerson University for the pedestrian zone on Gould Street, between O'Keefe Lane and Bond Street, and on Victoria Street, between Gould Street and a point approximately 64 metres south of Gould Street from October 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012 on the same terms and conditions generally as set out in the existing agreement and on such other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the General Manager of Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that the General Manager of Transportation Services be authorized to execute any such agreements(s) on behalf of the City.

 

2.         City Council authorize staff to extend the existing agreement with the University of Toronto for the pedestrian zone on Willcocks Street, between Huron Street and St. George Street from October 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012 on the same terms and conditions generally as set out in the existing agreement and on such other terms and conditions as may be deemed appropriate by the General Manager of Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, and that the General Manager of Transportation Services be authorized to execute any such agreements(s) on behalf of the City.

 

3.         City Council direct Transportation Services to report back to City Council through the Toronto and East York Community Council on the principles underlying the longer term maintenance agreements with Ryerson University and the University of Toronto, prior to the expiry of the six-month extension period.

Origin

(August 5, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, and the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services

Summary

At its meeting on August 17, 2010, Toronto and East York Community Council directed Transportation Services to implement pilot pedestrian zones on: 1) Gould and Victoria Streets at Ryerson University, 2) Willcocks Street at the University of Toronto, and 3) Devonshire Place at the University of Toronto from September 2010 to September 2011, and to report back on the pilot projects by the fourth quarter of 2011.

 

Two of the pedestrian zones – Gould and Victoria Streets, and Willcocks Street – have been highly successful and are recommended for extension with a view that staff will report back on proposed permanent closures to vehicular traffic. Measures of success were: creation of a new public space, safety and quality; economic, social and community impacts; and transportation and access impacts. Data included surveys, feedback from key partners, City divisions, businesses, residents and community associations; and traffic data and observational data.

 

To date, the universities have contributed about $372,000 for the two pedestrian zones to provide for year-round maintenance, landscaping, street furniture set-up, storage, and security, snow removal, cleaning, litter and waste management, events programming, and area improvements for their respective pedestrian zones.

 

This report is seeking authority from City Council to extend the existing maintenance agreement, with each of Ryerson University and the University of Toronto for their respective pedestrian zone, which will outline the roles and responsibilities of the City and the university for six months, from October 1, 2011 to March 31, 2012. This six-month extension would allow Transportation Services, as directed by the Toronto and East York Community Council, adequate time to report back to City Council through the Toronto and East York Community Council on the proposed permanent closure of the pedestrian zones to vehicular traffic and on the principles underlying longer-term maintenance agreements with the Universities.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 5, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District and the Director, Public Realm Section, Transportation Services - Pedestrian Zones - Gould Street/Victoria Street and Willcocks Street - Maintenance Agreements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40277.pdf

Speakers

Wei Yang Ong, University of Toronto

TE9.67 - Traffic Control Signals - King Street West at Dowling Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the removal of a pedestrian crossover (PXO) on King Street West at the west side of Dowling Avenue and, coincident with the removal of the PXO, approve the installation of traffic control signals at this intersection.

Origin

(August 3, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to install traffic control signals at the intersection of King Street West and Dowling Avenue.

 

The installation of traffic control signals at this location will replace an existing pedestrian crossover (PXO) and enhance safety for pedestrians and motorists.  This installation will result in the loss of approximately thirteen parking spaces in total, eight on King Street West and five on Dowling Avenue.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 3, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Control Signals - King Street West at Dowling Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40386.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0407 - Traffic Control Signals - King Street West at Dowling Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-39881.pdf

TE9.71 - Right-Turn Prohibition - Vaughan Road and Arlington Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1145 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the "No Right Turn, from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday" regulation by eastbound traffic on Vaughan Road at Arlington Avenue.

Origin

(August 9, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Councillor Joe Mihevc, on behalf of area residents has requested Transportation Services to investigate rescinding the right-turn prohibition from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday by eastbound traffic on Vaughan Road onto southbound Arlington Avenue.   This regulation is not required from an operational perspective. Therefore, Transportation Services has no objection to this proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 9, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Right-Turn Prohibition - Vaughan Road and Arlington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40376.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0418 - Right-Turn Prohibition - Vaughan Road and Arlington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40052.pdf

TE9.83 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 220 Rosemary Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and Community Planning to attend and hire independent planning consultants, if necessary, to uphold the Committee of Adjustment refusal regarding the 220 Rosemary Road application at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing when it is scheduled.

Origin

(August 24, 2011) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's West

Summary

The Toronto and East York panel of the Committee of Adjustment (C of A) refused an application for variances at 220 Rosemary Road, and the owner of the property is expected to appeal this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. The Committee of Adjustment's decision notice is attached.

 

The applicant plans to build a new three-storey detached dwelling (with integral garage) on a quiet residential street dominated by detached single-family homes. The size and location of this proposed development is out of character with the neighbourhood.

 

I believe the Committee of Adjustment made the right decision in rejecting the application. The density and impacts on neighbours are out of line with character of the neighbourhood. The applicant's proposal is simply too large for the site.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 24, 2011) Letter from Councillor Mihevc - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 220 Rosemary Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40233.pdf
Attachment - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 220 Rosemary Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40234.pdf

TE9.84 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Attention
Communications TE9.84.11 to TE9.84.13 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests for:

 

1.         Liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. each day for the establishments indicated and listed in the attachment to the letter (June 14, 2011) from Verle A. Mobbs, General Manager, during Canadian Music Week 2012 to be held from March 21, 2012 to March 25, 2012.

 

2.         Liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the dates and times listed for the establishments listed in the letter (September 8, 2011) from Sarah Riches during INDIE WEEK CANADA 2011, to be held from October 12-16, 2011 (including to 4:00 a.m. on Monday, October 17, 2011).

 

B.        City Council concur in the action taken in approving patio extensions on Saturday, September 17, 2011, from 11:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m., and on Sunday, September 18, 2011, from 11:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m., for the establishments listed in the revised letter (September 2, 2011) from Keith Denning, Coordinator, Roncesvalles Village BIA, during the 2011 Roncesvalles Polish Festival; and also for the road closures and beer tent, to be held on September 17 and 18, 2011.

 

C.        City Council concur in the action taken in approving liquor licence extensions from 10:00 a.m. until 4:00 a.m. each day for the establishments listed in the attachment to the letter (date-stamped August 17, 2011) from Troy Burtch, Co-founder, Toronto Beer Week, for Toronto Beer Week, to be held from September 16 to September 24, 2011.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

 

A.        For liquor licensing purposes, declared the following to be events of municipal significance:

 

1.         Canadian Music Week 2012 to be held from March 21-25, 2012 at the Fairmont Royal York and at various downtown venues.

 

2.         Toronto Argonauts Fan Festival to be held on October 1, 2011, at the Rogers Centre Gate 11 from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.

 

3.         Queen Street West Business Improvement Area "Out of Site: Contemporary Art Works" to be held from 6:59 p.m. on Saturday, October 1 until 7:00 a.m. on Sunday, October 2, 2011, on Queen Street West between Simcoe and Bathurst Streets.

 

4.         2011 Roncesvalles Polish Festival to be held from September 16 to 18, 2011, in Roncesvalles Village.

 

5.         Toronto Underground Market events to be held from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at the Holcim Gallery, Evergreen Brickworks, 550 Bayview Avenue on the following dates:

 

                        Saturday, September 24, 2011

                        Saturday, October 22, 2011

                        Saturday, November 19, 2011.

 

6.         Live Stand-Up Comedy Show, with live-to-air broadcast on CBC Radio at The Music Hall, 147 Danforth Avenue, to be held on Wednesday, October 19, 2011 from 7:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m.; and advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to this event.

 

7.         Road Hockey to Conquer Cancer Event to be held on Saturday, October 1, 2011, at Ontario Place, 955 Lake Shore Boulevard West, Toronto, from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

 

8.         INDIE WEEK CANADA 2011, to be held from Wednesday, October 12 to Sunday, October 16, 2011, at various locations.

 

9.         Hungarian Canadian Cultural Centre Fundraiser, to be held on October 15, 2011, from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. at the Hungarian Canadian Cultural Centre, 840 St. Clair Avenue West.

 

B.        Due to the timing of the following events, advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the requests for:

 

1.         Patio extensions on Saturday, September 17, 2011, from 11:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m., and on Sunday, September 18, 2011, from 11:00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. for the establishments listed in the revised letter (September 2, 2011) from Keith Denning, Coordinator, Roncesvalles Village BIA, during the 2011 Roncesvalles Polish Festival to be held on September 17 and 18, 2011, in Roncesvalles Village; and for the road closures and beer tent for this event.

 

2.         Liquor licence extensions from 10:00 a.m. until 4:00 a.m. each day for the establishments listed in the attachment to the letter (date-stamped August 17, 2011) from Troy Burtch, Co-founder, Toronto Beer Week, as part of Toronto Beer Week to be held from September 16 to September 24, 2011.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events for Liquor Licensing Purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2011) Letter from Verle A. Mobbs, General Manager, Canadian Music Week, requesting that The Canadian Music Week to be held on March 21-25, 2012, at the Fairmont Royal York and at various downtown venues, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a Liquor Sales Licence Extension until 4:00 a.m. for the establishments listed in the attachment from Ms. Mobbs for March 21-25, 2012. (TE.Main.TE9.84.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-24092.pdf
(July 6, 2011) E-mail from Carlos Ferreira, Director, Marketing IT, requesting that the Toronto Argonauts Fan Festival to be held on October 1, 2011, at the Rogers Centre Gate 11, from 4:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE9.84.2)
(July 8, 2011) Letter from Elana White, Vice-Chair, Queen Street West Business Improvement Area, requesting that Out of Site: Contemporary Art Works to be held from 6:59 p.m. on Saturday, October 1 until 7:00 a.m. on Sunday, October 2, 2011, on Queen Street West, between Simcoe and Bathurst Streets, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting an extension of hours until 4:00 a.m. for the establishments listed in the letter from Ms. White. (TE.Main.TE9.84.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-24094.pdf
(August 3, 2011) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks requesting that the Roncesvalles Polish Festival to be held from September 16 to 18, 2011, in Ronscevalles Village, be declared an event of municipal significance, and attaching a revised letter (September 2, 2011) from the Coordinator, Roncesvalles Village BIA, requesting patio extensions for the establishments listed in the letter during the Roncesvalles Polish Festival. (TE.Main.TE9.84.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-24095.pdf
(August 17, 2011) Letter from Troy Burtch, Co-Founder, Toronto Beer Week, requesting an extension of hours for the sale and service of alcohol from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. during Toronto Beer Week to be held from September 16 to September 24, 2011, for the establishments in the attachment to the letter from Mr. Burtch. (TE.Main.TE9.84.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-24096.pdf
(August 22, 2011) E-mail from Carly Dunster requesting that the Toronto Underground Market events to be held at the Holcim Gallery, Evergreen Brickworks, 550 Bayview Avenue on Saturday, September 24, 2011, Saturday, October 22, 2011 and Saturday, November 19, 2011 from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., be designated as events of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE9.84.6)
(September 2, 2011) E-mail from Michael Sherman, General Manager, The Music Hall, requesting that Council advise of its non-objection to a Live Stand-Up Comedy Show, with live-to-air broadcast on CBC Radio, to be held on Wednesday, October 19, 2011, from 7:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at The Music Hall, 147 Danforth Avenue. (TE.Supp.TE9.84.7)
(September 7, 2011) E-mail from Erin Ruth requesting that the Road Hockey to Conquer Cancer event to be held on Saturday, October 1, 2011, at Ontario Place, 955 Lake Shore Boulevard West from 6:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE9.84.8)
(September 8, 2011) Letter from Sarah Riches, Indie Week International, requesting that Indie Week Canada 2011 to be held from October 12-16, 2011, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting an extension of hours until 4:00 a.m. for the establishments listed in the letter from Ms. Riches. (TE.Supp.TE9.84.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-24519.pdf
(September 12, 2011) Letter from Gyula Olajos, Hungarian Canadian Cultural Centre, requesting that the Centre's fundraiser to be held on October 15, 2011, from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. at the Hungarian Canadian Cultural Centre, 840 St. Clair Avenue West, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE9.84.10)

Communications (City Council)

(August 31, 2011) Letter from Stephen Froemmel, Director of Food & Beverage, Renaissance Toronto Hotel Downtown (CC.Supp.TE9.84.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-24805.pdf
(September 14, 2011) E-mail from Kristy-Leigh Boone, Manager, Special Events, Toronto Blue Jays Baseball Club and Rogers Centre (CC.Supp.TE9.84.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-24806.pdf
(September 15, 2011) Letter from Sabrina Prodger, Event Coordinator, Live Events, Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd. (CC.Supp.TE9.84.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-24807.pdf

TE9.85 - Amendment to Chapter 918 - Ward 18 and Ward 21 (South of St. Clair Avenue West) - Pilot Project Specific Modifications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
18 - Davenport, 21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1129 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards, to provide:

 

a.         that despite §§ 918-5B, the General Manager, Transportation Services, may accept a front yard parking application for front yard parking for residential properties located within the area of the former City of Toronto in Ward 18 or in Ward 21, south of St. Clair Avenue West, where:

 

i.          the application is to attempt to legalize a front yard parking pad installed prior to April 16, 2007, without permission(s) from the City of Toronto and where the applicant submits proof acceptable to the General Manager, Transportation Services, of the existence prior April 16, 2007, of the parking pad;

 

ii.         additional ramping is not required or, if additional ramping is required, there is no loss of an on-street permit parking space; and

 

iii.        the property meets all other requirements of chapter 918

 

            (hereinafter referred to as "pilot project pads");

 

b.         that §§ 918-8C(2) and 918-8C(3) do not apply for a pilot project pad where there is no loss of an on-street permit parking space;

 

c.         that §§ 918-9D and §§ 918-9E shall not apply to a pilot project pad where additional ramping is not required;

 

d.         that upon approval of a pilot project pad, the applicant shall remove the existing paving and replace it  with a permeable paving consisting of at least 25% open space and which is acceptable to the General Manager, Transportations Services;

 

e.         that despite §§ 918-21B, where the General Manager, Transportation Services, refuses to accept an application for a pilot project pad, approve the issuance of a pilot project pad or grant permission of a pilot project pad, an applicant may appeal to the applicable community council in accordance with the appeal process set out in §§ 918-21A;

 

f.          that unless otherwise specified above, the applicant must comply with all other criteria set out in Municipal Code Chapter 918;

 

g.         that this pilot project shall be effective the date of City Council approval and end at midnight on December 31, 2013.

 

2.         City Council authorize staff to introduce in Council any bills that may be necessary to give effect thereto.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, to report to the Community Council in June 2014 on the success of the pilot project in Wards 18 and 21.

Origin

(September 4, 2011) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão, Ward 18, Davenport and Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's

Summary

There are many locations in our Wards where, for a variety of reasons, a "front yard parking pad" exists. Many of these locations have existed longer than the restrictions for front yard parking, and we have received numerous complaints from the current homeowners that these existed prior to the purchase of their homes and they have no mechanism to legalize the spots. In addition, those legal spots, many in very close proximity to the illegal ones, are subject to an annual fee and those owners have expressed resentment at having to pay a yearly fee to use what others may be using, without the annual fee being paid.

 

The only remedy so far has been to "block off" the parking area via the use of concrete curbstones or some other method. However, the paving remains and there is no benefit to the community by not allowing the pad to be used in a legal fashion.

 

This motion seeks to rectify this issue, in a "Pilot Program" in order to attempt to correct a long standing wrong. The benefits are that for those people looking to abide by the rules, staff can accommodate the request. When and where approved, these paved areas will utilize a more permeable surface, with the intent being to minimize the surface runoff and create a more pleasing esthetic to the local surroundings.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 4, 2011) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão , Ward 18, Davenport, and Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's West - Amendment to Chapter 918 - Ward 18 and Ward 21 (South of St. Clair Avenue West) - Pilot Project Specific Modifications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40708.pdf

TE9.86 - AGCO Liquor Licence Application - The Ace Restaurant - 231A Roncesvalles Avenue - Licence 815094

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for The Ace Restaurant, 231A Roncesvalles Avenue (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application unless the following conditions, in the form substantially set out below, are attached to the liquor licence:                        

    

            Conditions to be attached to Liquor Licence for  The Ace Restaurant, 231A Roncesvalles Avenue, Toronto

 

            There shall be no dance floor provided at the Premises except for special events.

 

            There shall be no video games provided at the Premises.

 

            The Premises shall not be used as a place for adult entertainment.

 

            If the Premises is sold or comes under new management, the Licensee shall provide written notice of the transaction to all persons residing on and/or owning property within 250 metres of the Premises’ property line.

 

            The existing licence shall be secured as part of the transaction.

 

            Food Service shall be prepared at the Premises and be available at all times that the Premises is open for business.

 

            There shall be no amplified sound from any part of the Premises causing audible noise to any residential building after 11:00 p.m.

 

            The Licensee shall provide a telephone number to area residents for residents to register concerns or complaints which will be answered by an employee of the Premises during all hours of operation.

 

            The Licensee shall not require a cover charge to enter the Premises other than for special charity or corporate events.

 

            Subject to final capacities established by the Fire Marshall, the Licensee shall ensure that a seat is available for every patron in the Premises.

 

            There shall be no application (permanent or temporary or special occasion) for a rooftop or rear yard patio area of the licence unless the rooftop or rear yard patio can operate in full compliance with all zoning, building and other applicable laws.

 

            Service of alcohol on a front yard patio shall end at 10:00 p.m. and the front yard patio shall be closed at 11:00 p.m.

 

2.         City Council request the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario or the Licence Appeal Tribunal to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario or Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, and litter.

Origin

(September 8, 2011) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 14, Parkdale-High Park

Summary

64364231A Ltd. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 231A Roncesvalles Avenue operating under the name The Ace Restaurant (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for a capacity of 36 patrons indoors, 4 patrons on a front yard patio, and 60 patrons on a rooftop patio. The Premises is located adjacent to a residential area, and impacts associated with the Premises may impact neighbouring residents. Their concerns relate in particular to noise, litter, safety and security, drug use, and other disturbances to residents in the area. The application includes the licensing of a rooftop patio. The proposed patio is not permitted under the in-force Zoning By-law.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. Under no circumstance should a liquor sales licence be granted at the Premises without appropriate conditions attached.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 8, 2011) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks - AGCO Liquor Licence Application - The Ace Restaurant, 231A Roncesvalles Avenue, Licence No. 815094
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40710.pdf

TE9.87 - AGCO Liquor Licence Application - The Inter-Steer Tavern - 357 Roncesvalles Avenue - Existing Establishment - Increase in Capacity: Boulevard Patio

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the increase in capacity of the existing liquor licence for an outdoor patio at Inter-Steer Tavern, 357 Roncesvalles Avenue, (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and be authorized to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Origin

(September 9, 2011) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks, Ward 14, Parkdale-High Park

Summary

The Inter-Steer Tavern has submitted an application for increased capacity for an existing liquor licence for an outdoor patio to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for the premises at 357 Roncesvalles Avenue ("Premises"). The Premises are located adjacent to a quiet residential area and may impact neighbouring residents. The residents' concerns relate to noise, litter, safety and other disturbances.

 

The Registrar of the AGCO should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application. Issues including, but not limited to, noise, litter and safety of the public must be addressed and appropriate conditions must be attached to the licence. This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, as set out above, are attached to the licence.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 9, 2011) Letter from Councillor Gord Perks - AGCO Liquor Licence Application - The Inter-Steer Tavern - 357 Roncesvalles Avenue - Existing Establishment - Increase in Capacity: Boulevard Patio
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40712.pdf

TE9.88 - Liquor Licence - 639 Queen Street West - The Burroughes - Licence 815052

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for The Burroughs, 639 Queen Street West (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the AGCO to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Origin

(September 9, 2011) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

Perry Lane Inc. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 639 Queen Street West operating under the name The Burroughes (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for a capacity of 295 patrons indoors, and 140 patrons on a rooftop patio. It is proposed that the Premises will operate as a Banquet Hall.

 

The Premises is located in close proximity to residential units. Therefore, the application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. The application is for a large indoor capacity of 295 patrons and includes a rooftop patio with a capacity of 140 patrons. Given that problems already exist with licensed establishments on this part of Queen Street West, as well as problems from rooftop patios in this neighbourhood, impacts associated with the proposed licence may adversely affect neighbouring residents.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. Given the large capacity being sought for the Premises and the inclusion of a proposed rooftop patio, under no circumstance should a liquor sales licence be granted at the Premises without appropriate conditions attached.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 8, 2011) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Liquor Licence - 639 Queen Street West - The Burroughes - Licence 815052
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40715.pdf

TE9.89 - Liquor Licence - 186 Spadina Avenue - Toronto Underground Cinema, Licence 815152

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Toronto Underground Cinema, 186 Spadina Avenue (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the AGCO to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Origin

(September 8, 2011) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

2169945 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 186 Spadina Avenue operating under the name Toronto Underground Cinema (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for an indoor capacity of 737 patrons. It is proposed that the Premises will continue to operate as a movie theatre. The deadline for the submission of objections to the application is September 14, 2011.

 

The Premises is located on the ground floor of a residential condominium building. Therefore, the application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless conditions, addressing the concerns of the residents, are attached to the licence. The application is for a large indoor capacity of 737 patrons and due to the immediate proximity of residential units impacts associated with the proposed licence may adversely affect residents.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. Given the large capacity being sought for the Premises and its location in a residential building, under no circumstance should a liquor sales licence be granted at the Premises without appropriate conditions attached.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 8, 2011) Letter from Councillor Vaughan - Liquor Licence - 186 Spadina Ave - Toronto Underground Cinema, Licence 815152
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40714.pdf

TE9.90 - Request for Confirmation of Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 12 Mercer Street and 60 John Street A0199/11TEY and Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning and the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board appeal hearing in support of the imposition of the following conditions on the approval of the requested minor variances with respect to 12 Mercer Street and 60 John Street:

 

a.         That the Owner pay to the City a further sum of $150,000 prior to the issuance of the first below ground building permit, to be used by the City for design development for John Street, capital improvements to public housing and arts space within Ward 20.

 

b.         That the Owner enter into and register an Agreement with the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and the City Solicitor, at the owner's expense, pursuant to Section 45(9.1) of the Planning Act to secure the payment required in 1a. above, prior to the Ontario Municipal Board issuing its order in this matter.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take any further steps necessary to implement this motion.

Origin

(September 9, 2011) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

City Council authorized a zoning by-law amendment for this site at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009, to permit a 33-storey mixed-use building primarily comprising a residential (condominium) building, subject to certain conditions being met, including the entering into and registration of a Section 37 Agreement.

 

The zoning by-law amendment and the Section 37 Agreement, required the owner to, amongst other matters, pay to the City an indexed cash contribution of $1,300,000 of which 10% would be allocated to affordable housing in Ward 20, and the remainder for the provision of one of more of the following: streetscape improvements to John Street and Mercer Street, Heritage Conservation District Studies in the King Spadina East Precinct and design development supporting the John Street streetscape project.

 

Subsequently, in 2011 the owner of the land revised the proposed unit mix and applied to the Committee of Adjustment for minor variances to permit reductions in the minimum required outdoor amenity space and parking which would allow an increase in the number of dwelling units on the site.

 

With the agreement of the owner of the lands, I, as the local councillor, wrote to the Committee of Adjustment requesting that it impose a condition pursuant to Section 45(9) of the Planning Act, requiring the owner to pay to the City the amount of $160,000 to be used by the City for design development for John Street. The Committee of Adjustment did not impose the requested condition.

 

At my request, and with the agreement of the owner of the lands, in order to preserve the right of City Council to appeal the failure of the Committee to impose the requested condition and be represented at an OMB hearing, the City Solicitor filed a notice of appeal (within the appeal period) for the limited purpose of seeking imposition of the condition together with a condition requiring the owner to enter into and register an agreement pursuant to Section 45(9.1) of the Planning Act, to secure the condition, on title to the land.

 

The requested conditions are reasonable and a matter of good planning in all of the circumstances as, amongst other things, the variances requested would allow an increase in the number of dwelling units on the site.  The requested condition would help improve the community for residents of the proposed development, for other residents, visitors and commercial purposes.

 

The Ontario Municipal Board will consider the City's appeal of the Committee of Adjustment decision failing to impose the requested condition, at a date yet to be determined.

 

This motion is made to confirm the appeal filed by the City Solicitor and to authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the imposition of the conditions set out below in this Motion.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 9, 2011) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Request for Confirmation of Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 12 Mercer Street and 60 John Street A0199/11TEY and Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40716.pdf

TE9.91 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 224 McCaul Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any appropriate staff to attend all proceedings in the matter of 224 McCaul Street before the Ontario Municipal Board to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse this application and to hire outside consultants if required to support City Council's position.

Origin

(September 8, 2011) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

The Owner of 224 McCaul Street has made an application to the Committee of Adjustment for variances from Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the construction of a third floor addition to an existing 2.5 storey dwelling containing three dwelling units.  In a decision dated June 28, 2011, the Committee refused to grant the requested variances.  The Owner of the property has appealed the Committee's decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.  The Board has scheduled a hearing for October 3, 2011.

 

The proposed addition requires a 30% increase in the density over what is permitted in the zoning by-law for this area.  This constitutes an over-intensification of the building.  The proposal would also substantially alter the appearance of the existing building and does not represent good planning.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 8, 2011) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 224 McCaul Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40717.pdf

Declared Interests (Community Council)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam - in that she and her family own a business on McCaul Street and residential property in the area.

City Council - New Business - Meeting 11

CC11.1 - Consideration of Compliance Audits of the offices of the Accountability Officers

(Recommendation resubmitted from the July 12, 13 and 14, 2011 City Council meeting - AU3.1)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Adoption of this Item requires 30 votes of Council.

Bill 1170 has been withdrawn on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Origin

(July 5, 2011) Report from the Audit Committee

Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the compliance audit of the offices of the Accountability Officers set out in Section 3-8 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Accountability Officers, be submitted by the external auditors to Council through the Audit Committee.

Summary

City Council on July 12, 13 and 14, 2011 considered Audit Committee Item AU3.1 on the results of an annual compliance audit of the Auditor General's Office.

 

The Audit Committee, among other things, recommended to Council that compliance audits of the offices of the Accountability Officers be considered by the Audit Committee.  This requires amendments to both Chapter 3, Accountability Officers, and Chapter 27, Council Procedures, of the Toronto Municipal Code.  An amendment to Chapter 27 requires notice. Notice had not been given in this case and accordingly, the Speaker ruled the recommendation out of order at the July meeting. The Speaker further advised Council that the City Clerk would resubmit the recommendation to the September 21 and 22, 2011 City Council meeting so that notice of the proposed amendment is given.

 

This Item resubmits the above-noted Audit Committee recommendation.  The City Solicitor will submit any required bill(s) to give effect to the proposed amendments to Chapters 3 and 27 of the Toronto Municipal Code.

 

Notice of the proposed amendment to Chapter 27, Council Procedures has also been posted on the City's Web site.

Background Information

Consideration of compliance audits of Accountability Officers - Audit Committee recommendation resubmitted to City Council (CC11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40876.pdf

CC11.2 - No Way to Comply: An Investigation into the Enforcement Practices of Municipal Licensing and Standards

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Ombudsman has submitted an Investigation report on this Item (CC11.2)

Origin

(September 15, 2011) Report from the Ombudsman

Recommendations

 The Ombudsman recommends that:

 

City Council receives, for information only, the investigation report.

Summary

In accordance with section 170(2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA), I am providing the attached report which represents a concluded investigation into a complaint about the Municipal Licensing and Standards Division’s enforcement practices and actions.

Background Information

(September 19, 2011) Covering report from the Ombudsman, submitting an Investigation Report, headed "No Way to Comply: An Investigation into the Enforcement Practices of Municipal Licensing and Standards (CC11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41058.pdf
(September 19, 2011) Investigation Report from the Ombudsman, headed "No Way to Comply: An Investigation into the Enforcement Practices of Municipal Licensing and Standards (CC11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41059.pdf
(September 15, 2011) notice of pending report from the Ombudsman on "No Way to Comply: An Investigation into the Enforcement Practices of Municipal Licensing and Standards (CC11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40872.pdf

CC11.3 - 167, 169, 177 and 181 Maplehurst Avenue - Site Plan Control Application - Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor client privilege

Origin

(September 15, 2011) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

 

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.         Council adopt the recommendations in the Confidential Attachment.

 

2.         The recommendations be made public once adopted by Council.

Summary

The applicant has submitted a proposal for a private school with one level of below grade parking on a site which is currently four residential lots on Maplehurst Avenue.  The school use is permitted in both the Official Plan and Zoning By-law but the proposal is subject to site plan control.  On April 21, 2011 the applicant appealed the Site Plan Control application to the Ontario Municipal Board based upon the City's failure to render a decision on the application within thirty days.

 

On August 22, 2011, the Ontario Municipal Board scheduled a hearing of the site plan appeal for five days commencing September 26, 2011.  This report is seeking Council's instruction as to how to proceed at the hearing.

Background Information

(September 15, 2011) report from the City Solicitor on 167, 169, 177 and 181 Maplehurst Avenue - Site Plan Control Application - Appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (CC11.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-40877.pdf
(September 15, 2011) Confidential Attachment 1 to the report from the City Solicitor

City Council - Member Motions - Meeting 11

MM11.1 - Relieving Congestion by Increasing Fines and Enforcement for Motorists and Delivery Vehicles that Obstruct Traffic During Rush Hour Periods - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
*Notice of this motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communication MM11.1.1 has been submitted on this Item

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Manager to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee with an implementation plan to increase fines to $500 for any motorist, including delivery vehicles, from stopping, standing, parking or otherwise obstructing traffic on arterial roads and in bicycle lanes during City-designated rush hour periods.

 

2.         City Council request the City Manager to work with the Toronto Police Service to increase enforcement of existing by-laws prohibiting any motorist, including delivery vehicles, from stopping, standing, parking or otherwise obstructing traffic, including bicycle lanes, on arterial roads during City-designated rush hour periods.

Summary

Traffic congestion is a significant problem for Toronto's motorists, public transit users and cyclists. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) recently noted that the Greater Toronto Area suffers from the longest work commute times in North America. This congestion costs the region's economy an estimated $3.3 billion per year while negatively impacting on the quality of life of our residents. The long-term solutions to this problem include building a more accessible, extensive and efficient public transportation system in addition to encouraging car-pooling and cycling.

 

In the meantime, Council can take small, but important, measures to alleviate traffic congestion. One such measure is to provide sufficient deterrents to motorists and delivery drivers that stop, stand, park illegally or otherwise obstruct traffic on arterial roads during rush hour. Far too often, entire lanes of major roads are blocked due to an individual pulling over to grab a coffee in the morning or a delivery vehicle choosing the afternoon rush period to drop off their goods. Drivers along arterials often use bicycle lanes as a parking lane, forcing cyclists to dangerously merge into traffic. During rush hour this creates very unsafe conditions for cyclists. While currently not permitted, it is clear that current fines and levels of enforcement are not sufficient to deter such activities.

 

This Motion seeks to improve traffic flow during the morning and afternoon rush hour periods by increasing the fines and level of enforcement for individuals that obstruct other motorists, public transit users and cyclists.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.1)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40528.pdf
(September 21, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41207.pdf

Communications

(September 20, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Dickie (MM.New.MM11.1.1)

MM11.2 - Amendment to the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for Trinity Park Square Improvements - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
*Notice of this motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Council-approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2011 Capital Budget to increase the capital project known as Trinity Park Square Improvements (Ward 27), by $57,000 to a total of $317,000 with funding from a Section 42 alternative parkland dedication from 570 Bay Street, source account number XR2213-4200096 to supplement the current funding.

Summary

Authority is being sought to amend the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget, approved by Council, to increase the capital project known as Trinity Park Square Improvements (Ward 27), by $57,000 to a total of $317,000 with funding from a Section 42 alternative parkland dedication from 570 Bay Street.  These additional funds are required to supplement the existing Council-approved funding for the capital project.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.2)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40530.pdf
(September 21, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41211.pdf

MM11.3 - Amendment to the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for Regents Park Playground - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
*Notice of this motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Council-approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2011 Capital Budget to increase the capital project known as Regents Park (Ward 35), by $75,000 to a total of $150,000 with funding from a Section 45 approval condition with respect to the development at 60 Fairfax Crescent, source account number XR3026-4500045, to supplement the current funding.

Summary

Authority is being sought to amend the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget, approved by Council, to increase the capital project known as Regents Park (Ward 35), by $75,000 to a total of $150,000 with funding from a Section 45 (minor variance) approval condition with respect to the development at 60 Fairfax Crescent. These additional funds are required to supplement the existing Council-approved funding for the capital project.  The funds have been received and the proposed purpose complies with the approval condition.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.3)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40531.pdf
(September 21, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41212.pdf

MM11.4 - Amendment to the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget for Warden Hilltop Community Centre Playground - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
*Notice of this motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Council-approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2011 Operating Budget to fund enhancements to the playground at Warden Hilltop Community Centre in the amount of $24,600 to be funded from a Section 45 (minor variance) approval condition with respect to the development at 60 Fairfax Crescent, source account number XR2213-4500045.

Summary

Authority is being sought to amend the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget, approved by Council, to fund the installation of swings to the new playground at Warden Hilltop Community Centre in the amount of $24,600 to be funded from a Section 45 (minor variance) approval condition with respect to the development at 60 Fairfax Crescent.

 

The playground structure installed by the developer does not include swings and play opportunities for the 2 -5 year old age group of children.  In co-operation with the local Councillor and based on public input, a small expansion of the playground area was proposed in order to accommodate a two-bay swing structure with 4 swings (2 baby, 2 belt), and a small climber with a wavy slide, stairs, an arch climber and a play panel.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.4)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40532.pdf
(September 21, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41213.pdf

MM11.5 - City of Toronto calls for Comprehensive Review to determine why glass panels are falling from some high-rise buildings - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
*Notice of this motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the appropriate City Officials to undertake a comprehensive review into glass panels falling from high-rises in Toronto, in consultation with other levels of government, engineers, builders, developers, trade unions, academics and industry organizations as necessary, and report back to the October Council meetings on their findings.

 

2.         City Council direct that the report include recommendations on any changes to City approval processes and regulations and the Ontario Building Code necessary to prevent, to the greatest degree possible, future incidents of falling glass.

 

3.         City Council direct that the report include actions to be taken on securing existing buildings, if necessary, against falling glass.

Summary

Over the course of past year, glass panels have shattered and fallen from several high-rise buildings in Toronto, causing great concern in the surrounding communities about public safety.

 

To date, despite the best efforts of City and development industry engineers, the cause of this hazard has not been determined conclusively and no explanation is available.

 

Council must ensure that the first priority of the City's processes, procedures and policies is to protect the communities that are home to tall buildings. Although opinions about the merits of tall buildings vary, everyone can agree that where they are approved and built, they should pose no risk to safety.

 

We have a responsibility to determine the cause of the falling glass and devise a solution.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.5)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40535.pdf

MM11.6 - Re-Instatement of the Bathurst-Finch Community Bus - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre
Attention
*Notice of this motion has been given.
*This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to re-instate the Bathurst-Finch Community Bus no later than January 1, 2012.

 

2.         City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to conduct community consultations to finalize the bus route.

Summary

The re-instatement of the Bathurst-Finch Community Bus will enhance the quality of life for seniors and others in this community. Wheel-Trans operates community bus routes in neighbourhoods with a high density of seniors, medical facilities, community facilities and shopping centres. Based on 2006 data, 4,645 seniors over the age of 65 lived in the Bathurst-Finch community. There were 15,914 ambulatory visits in 2008 by people over the age of 60 to the local hospital, North York General Hospital-Branson, according to Central LHIN data. There are also thousands of residents either with disabilities or without vehicles.

 

Currently, TTC routes in the neighbourhood do not provide the accessibility required by the seniors and others in the area. The Community Bus would operate on regular schedules along fixed routes from popular locations and connect to accessible bus or subway stops.

 

Re-instatement of the Bathurst-Finch Community Bus would not have a significant impact on the TTC budget. Passengers are expected to pay full TTC fares.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.6)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40739.pdf
(September 30, 2010) Presentation to the Toronto Transit Commission on the Bathurst-Finch Community Bus
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40740.pdf
(September 21, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41208.pdf

MM11.7 - Removing Toronto from the jurisdiction of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and asking the Province of Ontario to abolish the OMB - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
*Notice of this motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to amend the Planning Act, the Heritage Acts, and all other legislation under which the OMB operates and has jurisdiction to abolish the OMB and to provide that decisions of municipal councils are only appealable to the courts on questions of law.

 

2.         City Council send a copy of this resolution to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing, all local members of Provincial Parliament and GTA municipalities.

 

3.         Upon confirmation of the dissolution of the OMB, City staff and the Planning and Growth Management Committee continue the process of establishing the local appeal body for decisions of the Committee of Adjustment.

 

4.         City Council support the request of the City of Mississauga to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing for public consultations on these requests, and advise the Minister of its support in writing and offer of assistance to liaise with local stakeholders including business owners, property owners, residents, and individuals and corporations working in land use development and planning.

 

5.         Should during the Ministry and City-lead public consultations, it be revealed that municipal jurisdictions wish to remain subject to OMB hearings, then Toronto City Council and other municipal jurisdictions by a majority vote, be granted the option of removal from the OMB's purview.

Summary

Municipal councils in Ontario are directly elected by their constituents, and have general responsibility for land use planning in the public interest.

 

Since the establishment of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) in 1906—initially as the Ontario Railway and Municipal Board—it has evolved from an approval authority into an appeal body in matters of land use planning. As municipal councils developed increasingly sophisticated expertise and resources over decades, they have become qualified and better equipped to make informed and prudent decisions.

 

Toronto City Council is advised and informed by an established and experienced full-time Planning Department staffed with accredited professionals, and is capable of making decisions in the public interest.

 

City Councillors are eager to adopt the responsibilities their constituents expect of them. Councillors have the benefit of ongoing engagement with the communities they represent, and extensive knowledge of local issues, opinions and needs both large and small, on which they base their decisions.

 

City Councillors and the planning staff's ability to plan is undermined if applicants calculate that it is in their interests to treat City processes as a mere formality en route to an OMB hearing. Although many applicants are fair and reasonable in their dealings with the City, the OMB appeal process is not conducive to fostering good-faith negotiations and efforts. 

 

The current OMB hearing process is too cumbersome, too expensive, too time-consuming and too legalistic to facilitate wide-ranging citizen participation and is therefore unfair to the local residents as well as the community at large.

 

The current OMB process is also a drain on City Planning and Legal resources. Great urban planning is about looking forward using planning documents/guidelines/frameworks with the benefit of past professional experience, and this should be what planners should spend their time doing.  Instead, much of their time is spent defending appeals based on personal or private interests to the OMB. This situation also creates a disincentive for the City to appeal its own decisions, even where they are correct and in the public interest. All these matters impinge on the City's ability to meet its obligations to its constituents, including applicants expecting responses to their proposals.

 

The OMB tends to act as an arbitrator between the public and private interests, a function more suited to the Courts, which are a more appropriate venue for legal disputes.

 

The Planning Act treats appeals of municipal planning decisions to the OMB as de novo hearings and allows the OMB to substitute its decisions for those taken by democratically elected councils, generally having little regard for the public interest as expressed through these councils.

 

The Ontario Divisional Court held in the decision Minto Communities Inc.  v. the City of Ottawa that the OMB's powers on appeal of municipal planning decisions have not been altered by the requirement that it consider municipal decisions.

 

The Ontario Divisional Court has stated that a "more clear and specific expression of legislative intent" would be required to change the traditional role and practices of the OMB.

 

Certain planning matters respecting land severance applications and minor variances heard by the Committee of Adjustment, as well as heritage designations established by Council, are also subject to appeal to the OMB.

 

It is manifestly undemocratic for an appointed board such as the OMB to substitute its opinions for the considered judgment of elected councillors and professional city staff on matters affecting municipalities in which the councillors and city staff will continue to live and in which the OMB has no ongoing presence.

 

Furthermore, on June 22, 2011, the Council of the City of Mississauga voted unanimously to abolish the OMB.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.7)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40846.pdf
(September 21, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41209.pdf

MM11.8 - Authority for One-Time Grant to Cover Deficit in Operating Costs of Existing Below-Market Rent Tenants of 1652 Keele Street - by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - York South-Weston
Attention
*Notice of this motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 83 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, authorize, on a one-time only basis, a grant in the amount of approximately $85,758.54 towards the 2011 operating costs of 1652 Keele Street from the 2011 Approved Facilities Management Operating Budget.

 

2.         City Council, pursuant to the provisions of Section 83 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, authorize that the amount of approximately $40,580.00 which has accumulated in the Community Partnership and Investment Program account (NP0072) and that such sum be continued to be utilized as funding for property taxes that may be levied up at 1652 Keele Street for the years 2009 to 2015.

 

Summary

By the adoption of Executive Committee Item 13.3 at its meeting on November 19 and 20, 2007, City Council authorized new below-market rent (BMR) leases for seven (7) existing below market tenants at 1652 Keele Street provided that they continued to meet the City's eligibility criteria.

 

Pursuant to this authority and upon successful eligibility review by City staff, new BMR leases with Community Action Resource Centre in Toronto, Somali Immigrant Aid Organization, The Community Social Planning Council of Toronto, Women Abuse Council of Toronto and The Hispanic Community Centre for the City of York commenced on January 1, 2011.  The lease with For Youth Initiative, scheduled to expire in November, 2010, was extended by Council (Motion MM27.13 adopted on December 1, 2 and 3, 2008) to November 14, 2018. Somali Immigrant Women Association, a seventh (7th) BMR tenant within 1652 Keele Street, is currently overholding.  The BMR leases require these tenants to be in full compliance with the BMR policy including the provision that BMR tenants pay their proportionate share of all operating costs so that the City incurs no out-of pocket expenses.

 

When these seven BMR tenants were relocated to 1652 Keele Street in 2005 from a former City facility at 2696 Eglinton Avenue West, the operating costs were estimated at $3.20 per square foot.  These organizations have continued to pay operating costs based on that original estimated rate throughout their lease term.  In their new lease term at 1652 Keele Street, the estimated operating cost for the year 2011 is $17.74 per square foot (including HST).

 

As a result, these seven BMR tenants have advised, and (SFDA) staff review of their financials concur, that they are financially unable to fully contribute toward the 2011 operating costs, which will result in a shortfall to the City of $85,758.54.  These seven BMR tenants are requesting relief for the year 2011, which will provide them the opportunity to budget for the increase in costs to maintain affordability for effective service delivery to Weston-Mount Dennis residents.  The six eligible BMR tenants are budgeting for full payment of their respective share of operating costs starting January 1, 2012.

 

Currently, the spaces occupied by the BMR tenants at 1652 Keele Street have not been assessed by the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation for property taxes.  However, at its meeting held on May 12, 13 and 14, 2005, Council adopted Clause 13 of Report No. 3 of the Administration Committee which provided that funding for such property taxes for years 2006 to 2010 be included in the respective year's Community Partnership and Investment Program Budget submission.  As a result, the sum of approximately $40,580.00 has been accumulated in the Community Partnership and Investment Program Budget for 1652 Keele Street.  Municipal Property Assessment Corporation can assess property taxes and retroact the payment requirements by 2 years (that is, back to 2009).

 

The provision of City-owned space at below-market rent is a form of municipal investment in community organizations which assist the City to achieve its goals for residents and complement City programs and services.  As a result, there is a benefit to the City in providing short-term assistance to these tenants within the 1652 Keele Street facility and these tenants are not entities for whom a grant from the City is prohibited under Section 82 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.8)

Background Information

REVISED Member Motion MM11.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41131.pdf
(September 22, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41229.pdf

MM11.9 - Amendment to the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for Vermont Square - by Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Norman Kelly

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Norman Kelly, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget, approved by Council on February 23, 2011, to increase the capital project known as Vermont Square (Ward 20) by $50,000 to be funded from a Section 42 alternative parkland dedication from 426 University Avenue, from the source account number XR2213 – 4200071.  This will supplement the current funding and bring the total budget to $600,000.

Summary

Authority is being sought to amend the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget, approved by Council February 23, 2011, to increase the capital project known as Vermont Square (Ward 20) by $50,000.  The project increase is to be funded from a Section 42 alternative parkland dedication from 426 University Avenue.  These additional funds are required to supplement the existing council-approved funding.  With the increase, the total budget for Vermont Square Park will be $600,000.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as M11.9)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40865.pdf
(September 19, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41230.pdf

MM11.10 - Canadian Food Inspection Agency Forest Pest Compensation Regulations on Replacement Grants for Emerald Ash Borer - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Parks and Environment Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to enter into a purchase of service agreement with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency to order the removal of ash trees infected with Emerald Ash Borer.

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to report to the Canadian Food Inspection Agency on the removal orders issued to property owners making them eligible for the replacement grant offered through the Forest Pest Compensation Regulations.

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to further approach the Canadian Food Inspection Agency to request that City of Toronto-owned trees also be eligible for the replacement grants.

Summary

The City of Toronto, along with other municipalities, is experiencing the negative effects of the Emerald Ash Borer across the City. The City of Toronto is investing to replace City-owned trees to preserve our tree canopy.  The City does not have the means to replace trees on privately-owned properties. 

 

The Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) recently introduced Forest Pest Compensation Regulations to include replacement of trees infected with EAB.  The compensation referred to on the CFIA website is for trees that were removed or ordered to be removed by CFIA. The CFIA is however not ordering the removal of ash trees. Homeowners are removing ash trees to avoid hazards not because the CFIA is trying to prevent further spread of the insect.

 

The regulation, although good intentioned, covers only the trees the Canadian Food Inspection Agency orders to be cut down. As the agency is not ordering removal of trees, residents who require compensation are not eligible for the replacement grant to cover the cost of planting new trees.

 

The City of Toronto is seeking assistance from the Federal Government to compensate Toronto residents.  The City of Toronto could work with the Canadian Food Inspection Agency by entering into a purchase of service agreement to conduct the investigation and issue orders for removal of trees infected with Emerald Ash Borer enabling property owners to become eligible for the replacement grant.

 

In the case of Asian long horned beetle owners of trees close to the deemed infested areas were given orders to remove their private trees, the CFIA removed the trees and offered compensation to help owners with the replacement.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.10)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40869.pdf

MM11.11 - Free Press and Democracy - by Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.         No media conference, no media event or news release by The City of Toronto and/or any agency, board or commission of the City, and/or any staff, hired consultant or elected official of the City of Toronto shall exclude by name any individual journalist or news organization.

Summary

A free press is fundamental to the functioning of democracy.  To forbid, ban or frustrate one journalist or media outlet is a violation of the public's right to know.  To ban, prohibit or frustrate press freedom is a violation of the basic democratic principles that are the foundation of responsible government.  The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 2 (6) also guarantees the freedom of the press and other media of communication.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.11)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40873.pdf

MM11.12 - Ontario Municipal Board Direction - 376 Glen Manor Drive - by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any necessary staff to attend the OMB hearing on Wednesday, December 14, 2011 to support the Committee of Adjustment decision regarding 376 Glen Manor Drive.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to reach a mutually agreeable settlement if possible, if a revised plan can be submitted to the satisfaction of Planning and Legal staff.  Specifically the proposal could address Planning staff concerns, if revised to eliminate the below grade garage at the front and to provide parking at the rear (accessed off the lane).

Summary

City Council directs the City Solicitor or designate and the Chief Planner or designate to attend OMB hearings to oppose a residential construction project at 376 Glen Manor Drive.

 

The requested zoning variances were refused by the Committee of Adjustment and some were opposed by Planning staff and the Councillor.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.12)

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM11.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40874.pdf
(July 19, 2011) Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission for 376 Glen Manor Drive, from the Manager and Deputy Secretary Treasurer, Toronto and East York Panel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41069.pdf

MM11.13 - Budget Adjustments to the Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget (EX7.18) Removal of the Matter from Executive Committee - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* The Executive Committee currently has jurisdiction for this subject matter. A two thirds vote is required to remove Item EX7.18 from the Committee's jurisdiction.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve adjustments to the 2011 Toronto Public Health Operating Budget, as follows:

 

a.         An increase of $170.0 thousand gross and $0.0 net and an increase of two full-time Public Health Nurse (PHN) positions to reflect the new ongoing Provincial 100% base funding from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; and

 

b.         The annual expenditures by Toronto Public Health for the two new nursing positions not to exceed the available Provincial funding for these nurses in any given year.

Summary

The Executive Committee at its meeting of June 20, 2011 passed a motion to defer indefinitely Item EX7.18, Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget. (Item BU12.17).

 

The indefinite deferral by Executive Committee of Item EX7.18 on June 20  results in the Board of Health for the City of Toronto not being able to secure 100% ongoing base funding from the Province of Ontario for two Public Health Nurses. The budget adjustment for Toronto Public Health for this year would be $170,000 gross, $0 net.

 

These positions would be used in low-income, high-need areas of the City with large numbers of new immigrants and residents with elevated rates of many chronic diseases. These populations would benefit from additional information about local health promotion and disease prevention services. In particular the positions would focus on increased prevention initiatives related to heart disease, stroke and diabetes, and on increasing immunization rates among newcomers to the City and their children.

 

The decision of the Executive Committee on September 6, 2011 (EX9.9) to recommend to Council that the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget be adjusted to add three new full-time Public Health Nurses, funded 100% provincially on an ongoing basis, to support the Toronto Bed Bug project, indicates that it would be the appropriate time to reconsider the budget adjustments for the two additional full-time Nursing positions previously offered by the Province.

 

City Council should undertake this reconsideration on the basis of new information pertinent to the issue, namely, the approval by the Executive Committee of item EX9.9 on September 6, 2011.

 

"An increase of $255.1 thousand gross and $0.0 net and an increase of three contracted Public Health Nurse (PHN) positions to reflect the new 100 percent base funding from the MOHLTC.  No incremental expense shall be incurred for overhead, administration or logistical support for these positions beyond the allocated amount from the province.  These positions will be eliminated immediately upon the cessation of 100% provincial funding."

 

Facts related to this issue:

 

1.         The 100% funding covers all salaries and benefits for two new nursing positions.

 

2.         The 100% funding is ongoing.

 

3.         If, for any unforeseen reason, the funding was eliminated, the positions would be eliminated also.

 

4.         If, for any unforeseen reason, the funding was reduced or frozen, Toronto Public Health expenditures for the two positions would be similarly reduced or frozen.

 

5.         The 100% funding is available for new full time nursing positions only.

 

6.         The two full time nursing positions have been offered to all 36 boards of health in Ontario. To date, no other municipality has refused to accept the two nurses, and none are expected to do so.

 

7.         The two nursing positions are funded from the same provincial program envelope as three new full-time nursing positions for the Bed Bug programs which are recommended for Council approval in EX 9.9.

 

8.         Toronto residents contribute a large percent of the revenue received by the provincial government. If Council does not overturn the Executive Committee decision, tax revenue from Toronto will be used to help fund additional nurses everywhere else in Ontario except in Toronto.

 

9.         In 2010, City Council accepted $44.4 million in 100% provincially-funded staff and programs. These programs provide dental treatment for children whose families can't afford it (Healthy Smiles), health promotion programs for new mothers (Healthy Babies, Healthy Children), Pre-School Speech and Language programs, and other important public health services. These have, in the past, been routinely approved by the Board of Health, Budget Committee, Executive Committee and Council.

 

10.       Not accepting 100% provincial funding for Toronto Public Health programs will either deprive Toronto residents of millions of dollars in necessary programs and services or will cost the City millions of dollars to pay the full cost itself.

 

Decision History

Executive Committee June 20, 2011 http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2011.EX7.18.

 

Letter from Budget Committee June 7, 2011 http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-38952.pdf.

 

Medical Officer Report to the Board of Health April 27, 2011 Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget http://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/bu/bgrd/backgroundfile-38311.pdf.

 

Executive Committee September 6, 2011

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2011.EX9.9

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.13)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-40875.pdf
(September 21, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41231.pdf

MM11.14 - Amendment to the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget for Lytton Park Playground Enhancements - by Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice. * This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral. * This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Council-approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2011 Capital Budget to increase the capital project known as Lytton Park Playground Enhancements (Ward 16), by $325,000 to a total of $450,000.  The $325,000 is to be cash flowed in year 2012, funded from a Section 42 alternative parkland dedication from 1717 Avenue Road, source account number XR2213-4200006.

Summary

Authority is being sought to amend the 2011 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Capital Budget, approved by Council February 23, 2011, to increase the capital project known as Lytton Park Playground Enhancements (Ward 16), by $325,000 to a total of $450,000.  The $325,000 is to be cash flowed in year 2012 with funding from a Section 42 alternative parkland dedication from 1717 Avenue Road.  The additional funds are required in order to tender and award the project this year and to supplement the existing Council-approved funding for the capital project to meet community expectations for completion in the spring of 2012.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.14)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41066.pdf
(September 20, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41232.pdf

MM11.15 - Ontario Municipal Board hearing - Committee of Adjustment Application - 40 Woodbury Road - by Councillor Mark Grimes, Seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
*This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
*This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
*This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to accept a settlement offer for a revised Committee of Adjustment application  pertaining to 40 Woodbury Road before the Ontario Municipal Board if:

 

a.         The revised application proposes no more than four dwelling units on site;

b.         The applicant agrees to appropriately screen the garbage area to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District; and

c.         The applicant agrees to appropriately screen the parking area to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

Pursuant to Member Motion 10.19 adopted by City Council on July 12 and 13, 2011, City Council authorized the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of a Committee of Adjustment decision to refuse the application with respect to 40 Woodbury Road (Application A18/11EYK) involving the legalization of an existing five unit building.

 

The Ontario Municipal Board is scheduled to hear the appeal on Tuesday, September 27, 2011.

 

In the event the applicant reduces the number of proposed units to four and agrees to appropriately screen the garbage and parking areas, this Motion is made to authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board to request the approval of an amended variance application.

 

Reducing the number of units to four units would eliminate the parking variance.  One variance would be required varying the total number of units to four from the permission of three units in the By-law.  The building is currently used as a five-unit building and was originally built in 1952 as a four-plex.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.15)

Background Information

(September 22, 2011) Member Motion MM11.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41147.pdf

MM11.16 - 2242 and 2246 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Authority to Enter into Encroachment Agreement and/or to Release and Replace Existing Sewer Easement - by Councillor Mark Grimes, Seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
*This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
*This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
*This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         That City Council authorize entering into an encroachment agreement with respect to tiebacks and service connections encroaching into the City's existing sewer easement at 2242 & 2246 Lake Shore Boulevard West, and/or the release of all or portions of the existing sewer easement and the replacement of the released portions if  determined necessary by the Executive Director of Technical Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor, such encroachment agreement and/or releases and replacement easement to be on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director of Technical Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor.

 

 

Summary

The City of Toronto has a registered sewer easement over a portion of 2242 & 2246 Lake Shore Boulevard West.   The developer of the condominium project at this address is required under the registered Site Plan Agreement to enter into an encroachment agreement with the City with respect to tiebacks and proposed service connections encroaching under the existing sewer easement along Lake Shore Boulevard West, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services and the City Solicitor.  The encroachment agreement must be entered into prior to the registration of the first condominium corporation on the site.

 

The purpose of this motion is to obtain authority for the entering into of the encroachment agreement or possibly the release and replacement of the existing easement if the Executive Director of Technical Services and City Solicitor should determine that it is more appropriate to update the easement document.

 

This is an urgent matter as the developer and unit purchasers are anxious to register the first condominium building on the site.

 

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.16)

 

Background Information

(September 22, 2011) Member Motion MM11.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41148.pdf

MM11.17 - 149 Strachan Avenue - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
*This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
*This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
*This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing scheduled for November 2nd, 2011 along with independent land-use planning experts if necessary, to defend the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of variances at 149 Strachan Avenue Committee of Adjustment File#: A1013/10TEY

Summary

The owner of the property applied to the Committee of Adjustment for two variances for a condominium redevelopment of a former industrial site.

 

Several members of the community attended in opposition to the application and the

Committee refused the proposed application. An Ontario Municipal Board meeting has been scheduled for November 2, 2011.

 

Recognizing the concern the community has for this project and that the nature of the project, I believe that the decision of the Committee of Adjustment should be upheld.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.17)

Background Information

(September 22, 2011) Member Motion MM11.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41153.pdf
(September 22, 2011) Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission, 149 Strachan Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41154.pdf

MM11.18 - Request the Federal Government to grant the Canadian Air and Space Museum (CASM) a long-term reprieve and provide assurances of its preservation on the Downsview lands - by Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor David Shiner.

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - York Centre
Attention
*This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
*This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
*This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor David Shiner, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council call on the Federal Government to recognize the contributions of Canadian aerospace and aviation innovation;  grant the Canadian Air and Space Museum (CASM) located on the site of the former military base in Downsview, a long-term reprieve and provide assurances of its preservation on the Downsview lands.

Summary

CASM is an aviation museum featuring artefacts and exhibits which illustrate a century of Canadian aviation heritage and achievements. The museum is situated within Parc Downsview Park (PDP), and is housed in what was the original factory for the deHavilland Aircraft Company of Canada. It contains a full-sized replica of the famous Avro Arrow – one of Canada's finest achievements in cold war-era aircraft technology. It is the oldest surviving aircraft factory building in Canada. The institution is run by volunteers and has the goal of educating its visitors on the Canadian aerospace industry and technology. The museum is a registered non-profit organization with a charitable registration number. In 2010, City Council recognized the museum as a cultural asset and granted it tax exemption as a non-profit exposition hall. The museum has been an excellent community partner in Ward 9 and provides a valuable education service by preserving Canadian aerospace and aviation history.

 

On September 20, 2011 PDP evicted CASM without warning forcing volunteers to begin moving the artefacts and materials unceremoniously into the street. The full-sized Avro Arrow replica was pushed into the parking lot.

 

(Submitted to City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 as MM11.18)

Background Information

Member Motion MM11.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-41157.pdf

City Council - Bills and By-laws - Meeting 11

BL11.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming By-laws

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact General Bills and Confirming Bills.

Background Information

(September 22, 2011) Consolidated By-law Index for September 21 and 22, 2011 Meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-41024.pdf
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council