City Council

Meeting No.:
37
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Wednesday, July 17, 2013

Thursday, July 18, 2013

Friday, July 19, 2013

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
clerk@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed.  The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

 

Members of Council and Staff:  Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended.  The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements:  If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

July 10, 2013


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at  www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

 

 

 

Routine Matters - Meeting 37

RM37.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

• O Canada

• Moment of Silence

• Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Don Smith
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60366.pdf
Condolence for victims of disaster in Lac-Mégantic
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60386.pdf
Condolence Motion for Walter A. Moos
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60367.pdf

RM37.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on June 11, 12 and 13, 2013.

RM37.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Deferred Committee Items:

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE21.14

                        Executive Committee Item EX32.1

                        Executive Committee Item EX32.9

                        Planning and Growth Management Committee PG24.1

                        Planning and Growth Management Committee PG24.3

 

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 33 on July 3, 2013

                        Submitted by Mayor Rob Ford, Chair

 

Report of the Audit Committee from Meeting 12 on July 4, 2013

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 22 on June 5, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Frances Nunziata, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 23 on June 28, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Frances Nunziata, Chair

 

Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 22 on June 26, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Chair

 

Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 23 on June 25, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 23 on June 17, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Norman Kelly, Chair

 

Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 21 on June 24, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 25 on June 20, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Peter Milczyn, Chair

 

Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 24 on June 19, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 10 on June 27, 2013

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 25 on June 18, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 25 on June 18, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 25 on June 18, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, Chair

 

Report of the Toronto and East York Council from Meeting 25 on June 18, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Paula Fletcher, Chair

 

New Business submitted by the Mayor and City Officials

RM37.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM37.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

Background Information

(May 1, 2013) Fact Sheet from the City Clerk regarding "Points of Order and Points of Privilege" recirculated to Members of Council
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60373.pdf

RM37.6 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

July 16, 2013 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60289.pdf
July 17, 2013 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60320.pdf
July 18, 2013 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60322.pdf
July 19, 2013 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60333.pdf

Deferred Items - Meeting 37

TE21.14 - Final Report - 25 Ontario Street - Zoning Amendment Application

(Deferred by City Council from March 21, 2013 - 2013.TE21.14) (Deferred by City Council from February 20, 2013 - 2013.TE21.14)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 25 Ontario Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 13 to the report (December 18, 2012) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

           

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.          An indexed cash contribution of $400,000.00 which will be allocated towards the North St. Lawrence Market redevelopment, the implementation of the Heritage Lighting Master Plan for Old Town Toronto and the Heritage Interpretation Master Plan for Old Town Toronto, and local streetscape improvements, the design of which will be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

           

i.          At least ten, three-bedroom dwelling units, bedroom to be defined as a habitable room which meets the requirements of the Ontario Building Code, shall be provided in the building.

 

ii.         The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 - required, and Tier 2 - enhanced, performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee.

 

iii.        Design and construction of proposed development on the lot substantially in conformity with the architectural design identified on elevation plans on file with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, prepared by Burka Architects, dated November 30, 2012, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, the details of which, including the exterior materials, will be refined on approved plans and drawings in the context of site plan approval pursuant to Section 114, of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended and, as applicable, Section 41 of the Planning Act, as amended, and secured in a Site Plan Agreement with the City.

 

iv.        Prior to final site plan approval the owner shall provide a noise impact study and emissions study, which shall be peer reviewed by the city at the owner's cost; the owner shall incorporate appropriate mitigation, attenuation or equivalent measures into the design of the proposed building in response to the findings of the peer reviewed studies, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

v.         Prior to final site plan approval, the owner shall provide a pedestrian level wind study to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

vi.        Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the owner shall:

 

a.         Provide a detailed Conservation Plan for the conservation work described in the HIA, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant detailing all recommended interventions, and estimated costs for all conservation work satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         Submit final landscape plans and drawings, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c.         Submit an Interpretation Plan that fully interprets the heritage values of the Drug Trading Company Administrative Office to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

d.         Submit a Lighting Plan that describes how the building will be sensitively illuminated at night to enhance the building’s heritage character to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

vii.       Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the heritage property, 25 Ontario Street, including a permit for the demolition, excavation, and or shoring of the subject property, the applicant shall provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; the owner shall:

 

a.         Submit final building permit plans and drawings for the alterations and new construction, satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         Provide a Letter of Credit in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure the approved conservation work.

 

c.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs and a certificate of completion prepared by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

viii.      The Owner retain a consultant archaeologist, licensed by the Ministry of Culture and Tourism under the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O 1990 as amended) to carry out a Stage 2 archaeological resource assessment of the subject property and follow through on recommendations to mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. (i.e., Stage 3-4).

 

The assessment is to be completed in accordance with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists, Ministry of Culture and Tourism.  Should the archaeological assessment process continue beyond a Stage 2 assessment, any recommendations for Stages 3-4 mitigation strategies must be reviewed and approved by Heritage Preservation Services prior to commencement of the site mitigation.

 

a.         The Owner shall ensure that no demolition, construction, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the City’s Planning Division (Heritage Preservation Services Unit) and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism (Heritage Operations Unit) confirming in writing that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied.

 

b.         Prior to final Site Plan approval, the Owner shall submit a copy of the relevant assessment report(s) to the Heritage Preservation Services Unit in both hard copy format and as an Acrobat PDF file on compact disk.

 

c.         Prior to final Site Plan approval the Owner shall incorporate significant archaeological resources and findings into the proposed development through either in situ preservation and interpretation where feasible, or commemorate and interpret the resources through exhibition development on site including, but not limited to, commemorative plaquing.

 

d.         Prior to the release of any above grade permit for the subject property, the Owner shall provide a Letter of Credit in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to secure any on-site interpretation as may be required.

 

e.         Prior to the return of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall implement site interpretation as may be required, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to submit a noise impact and emissions study to the City, which shall be peer reviewed by the City at the Owner’s cost, addressing the impacts of both noise and exhaust emanating from the property at 280 King Street East onto the proposed development and the appropriate mitigation, revisions or equivalent measures required to be incorporated by the Owner into the design of the proposed development,  satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

6.         City Council direct that the local capital improvement portion of the cash-in-lieu of parkland payment (i.e., 25 percent) made pursuant to Section 42 of the Planning Act with respect to the development be directed to improvements within the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood and King-Parliament areas.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on January 22, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(December 18, 2012) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes the redevelopment of the property at 25 Ontario Street with a 21-storey mixed-use building, consisting of commercial uses on the ground floor and a residential condominium above.  The proposal includes the retention of the north and west walls of the existing listed heritage building.  A total of 219 dwelling units, including 35% at two–bedroom or larger, and 198 vehicular parking spaces in five levels of below-grade parking are proposed.  The applicant is seeking to attain Tier Two of the Toronto Green Standard for the proposed development.

 

The proposed building, with its heritage retention and contextually sensitive massing represents the type of built form that is consistent with the planning framework and emerging built form for this area of King-Parliament.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 18, 2012) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 25 Ontario Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-53903.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

Report Item TE21.14 deferred at City Council on March 21, 2013

Speakers

Joe Berridge, Urban Strategies Inc.
Neil Smiley, Faskin Martineau DuMoulin LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(January 22, 2013) Letter from Neil M. Smiley, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP (TE.Supp.TE21.14.1)
(December 13, 2012) Letter from E. Stuart Bowden, SAS, addressed to the City Planning Division (TE.Supp.TE21.14.2)

EX32.1 - Amendments to City of Toronto Anti-Discrimination Policies

(Deferred by City Council from June 11, 2013 - 2013.EX32.1)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
First Item of business after the Mayor's Key Matter, Item CC37.17

Communications EX32.1.59 to EX32.1.62 have been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the revised Declaration of Compliance with Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Legislation and City Policy (the template for Divisional use is attached as Appendix A to the report (April 9, 2013) from the City Manager).

 

2.         City Council adopt the amended Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Policy (Appendix B to the report (April 9, 2013) from the City Manager).

 

3.         City Council adopt the amended Hate Activity Policy (Appendix C to the report (April 9, 2013) from the City Manager).

 

4.         City Council request City agencies and corporations to:

 

a.         review and amend their Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination and Hate Activity Policies to reflect the purpose and principles of the City's Policies as appropriate to their organizations, and/or adopt such policies;

 

b.         post such policies so that they are easily accessible to employees and service recipients pursuant to their obligations under applicable legislation by the fall of 2013.

 

5.         City Council receive the report (April 8, 2013) from the City Solicitor for information.

 

6.         City Council direct that the confidential information in Attachment 1 to the report (April 8, 2013) from the City Solicitor shall remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to litigation or potential litigation affecting the City of Toronto.

 

7.         City Council approve the revised City of Toronto Community Grants Policy as presented in Appendix A to the report (April 9, 2013) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration.

 

8.         City Council direct the Director, Equity, Diversity and Human Rights and the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration to research and propose a City of Toronto protocol to facilitate resolution of competing interests conflicts.

 

9.         City Council direct that the Toronto anti-discrimination policy include a provision that requires an organization that receives either direct or indirect cultural funding from the City to not permit any hate speech or discriminatory behaviour or messaging that is contrary to the City's Policy, in which case the direct funding is to be returned to the City or refused by the City.

 

10.       City Council endorse the principle in the report (April 9, 2013) from the City Manager, that "Pride and all groups with competing interests ensure that they are complying with the Ontario Human Rights Code, not contravening hate provisions of the Criminal Code and that all sides are demonstrating mutual respect for the dignity and worth of all involved."

 

11.       City Council request an automatic review of the City of Toronto anti-discrimination policy at least one time each Council term.

 

12.       City Council direct that use of the Major Cultural funding for the Pride Festival be limited to support for cultural elements of the festival including the performance stages and not be used to support the Pride Parade.

 

13.       City Council direct that events which are funded by the City of Toronto, and/or take place on City of Toronto property, are in accordance with the objectives of the City of Toronto of promoting respect, tolerance and diversity, and do not support partisan political activity as identified in section 5.1.6 of the amended Grants Policy, and that the grants guidelines and use of space guidelines are consistent with the amended Grants policy.

 

14.       City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to research and propose a City of Toronto protocol to facilitate resolution of competing interest conflicts.

Origin

(April 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report clarifies the City's process for dealing with discrimination complaints related to City services that are directly delivered and those that are contracted/delivered by third parties. 

 

The report responds to the September 2012 Executive Committee motions to report on amendments to the City's anti-discrimination policies and to revise the Declaration of Compliance. The Hate Activity and Human Rights and Anti-Harassment /Discrimination Policies have been amended to include new Code grounds; evolving legislated obligations; clarification of requirements regarding third party providers of City services and provisions to ensure that events funded by the City and/or that take place on City property comply with City anti-discrimination expectations while promoting respect, tolerance and diversity.  The Hate Activity and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Policies both include language in response to the request by the Executive Committee: "the City condemns harassment, denigration, discriminatory actions and promotion of hatred."  Amended procedures will be implemented to ensure consistent handling of hate activity and harassment/discrimination complaints. The City Solicitor has submitted a separate report commenting on the original policy wording as requested by Executive Committee. 

 

All third-party organizations/individuals that engage in a contract relationship with the City (e.g. permit holders, grant recipients, contractors) are required to sign a Declaration of Compliance with Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Legislation and City Policy.  The Declaration reflects anti-discrimination obligations contained in legislation and City Policy that the City expects third party service providers to uphold.  The Declaration now includes the grounds of "level of literacy" and "political affiliation" as the two grounds that go beyond the Ontario Human Rights Code but are included in City policies. All City legal agreements to which the Declaration applies, will include provisions that stipulate that discrimination complaints must be resolved to the satisfaction of the operating division and the City Solicitor or the contract may be terminated.  

 

While the report addresses the obligations of grant recipients to abide by the City's anti-discrimination expectations or be subjected to consequences for non-compliance, the motions regarding amendments to the City's Grants Policy and funding conditions are being addressed in a separate report by Social Development, Finance and Administration Division.

 

To ensure a consistent equity approach, the City's Agencies and Corporations are requested to review and amend their Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Policies to reflect the purpose and principles of the City's Policies as appropriate to their organizations, and/or adopt such policies.

 

The policy amendments will continue to advance the City's equity commitments while minimizing financial risk resulting from provincial complaints tribunals.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager on Amendments to City of Toronto Anti-Discrimination Policies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58132.pdf
Appendix A - Declaration of Compliance with Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Legislation and City Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58133.pdf
Appendix B - Human Rights and Anti-Harassment/Discrimination Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58134.pdf
Appendix C - Hate Activity Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58135.pdf
Appendix D - Equity, Diversity and Human Rights Legislative and Policy Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58136.pdf
Appendix E - Discrimination Complaints Handling Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58137.pdf

Speakers

(April 23, 2013) Debbie Douglas, Executive Director, Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants (OCASI)
(April 23, 2013) Ceta Ramkhalawansingh
(April 23, 2013) Nick Mule, Chairperson, Queer Ontario
(April 23, 2013) Joan A. MacNeil, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East - Toronto
(April 23, 2013) Lester Brown (Submission Filed)
(April 23, 2013) Anita Block
(April 23, 2013) Gene Tishauer
(April 23, 2013) Don Schmidt (Submission Filed)
(April 23, 2013) Sara Traub
(April 23, 2013) Anita Bromberg, National Director, Legal Affairs, B'nai Brith Canada
(April 23, 2013) Nigel Barriffe, Urban Alliance on Race Relations (UARR) (Submission Filed)
(April 23, 2013) Sue Goldstein, International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (IJAN)
(April 23, 2013) Elle Flanders
(April 23, 2013) Stephen Adler, Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs
(April 23, 2013) Howard English, Senior Up, Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs
(April 23, 2013) Joan Anderson, Toronto HIV/Aids Network
(April 23, 2013) Christian Hui, Steering Committee Member, Toronto HIV/AIDS Network
(April 23, 2013) Tony Souza, Queers Against Israeli Apartheid (Submission Filed)
(April 23, 2013) Elizabeth Block, Independent Jewish Voices
(April 23, 2013) Hamish Wilson
(April 23, 2013) Sriram Ananth, Member, Labour for Palestine
(April 23, 2013) Susan Gapka, Trans Lobby Group
(April 23, 2013) Suzanne Weiss
(April 23, 2013) Francisco Alvarez, Co-Chair, Pride Toronto
(April 23, 2013) Sean Hillier, Co-Chair, Pride Toronto
(May 28, 2013) Carol Rawson
(May 28, 2013) Martin Gladstone
(May 28, 2013) David Nitkin
(May 28, 2013) Sam Eskenasi, Communication Officer, B'nai Brith Canada (Submission Filed)
(May 28, 2013) Shirley Anne Haber, President, The Speakers Action Group
(May 28, 2013) Dr. Joel Goldman
(May 28, 2013) Ted Schmidt (Submission Filed)
(May 28, 2013) Dr. Paul Druzin
(May 28, 2013) Lester Brown (Submission Filed)
(May 28, 2013) Richard Klagsbrun
(May 28, 2013) Stacey Starkman, Comminications Manager, Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre (Submission Filed)
(May 28, 2013) Joan MacNeil, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East
(May 28, 2013) Arthur Arbour, Christian Peacemaker Teams
(May 28, 2013) Kelly Baumgartner
(May 28, 2013) Hina Thompson
(May 28, 2013) Sherman Hesselgrave
(May 28, 2013) Stephen Adler, Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs
(May 28, 2013) Sue Goldstein, International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (IJAN), Toronto
(May 28, 2013) Howard Davidson
(May 28, 2013) Hamish Wilson (Submission Filed)
(May 28, 2013) Paul Ross, Today's CLIC (Submission Filed)
(May 28, 2013) Niko Block, Queers Against Israeli Apartheid
(May 28, 2013) Hassan Maalbaki
(May 28, 2013) Gene Tishauer (Submission Filed)
(May 28, 2013) Tim McCaskell, Queers Against Israeli Apartheid
(May 28, 2013) Art Young
(May 28, 2013) E.V. Raymer, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East
(May 28, 2013) Francisco Alvarez, Co-chair, Pride Toronto
(May 28, 2013) Kevin Beaulieu, Executive Director, Pride Toronto
(May 28, 2013) Vivienne Ziner
(May 28, 2013) Suzanne Weiss
(May 28, 2013) Senior Rabbi Baruch Frydman-Kohl, President, Toronto Board of Rabbi, Anne and Max Tanenbaum Rabbinic Chair Beth Tzedec Congregation (Submission Filed)
(May 28, 2013) Susan Gapka
(May 28, 2013) Linda Meissenheimer
(May 28, 2013) Leo Adler
(May 28, 2013) Anita Block
(May 28, 2013) Councillor Janet Davis
(May 28, 2013) Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Communications (Committee)

(February 19, 2013) E-mail from Nathalie Des Rosiers, General Counsel, Canadian Civil Liberties Association (EX.Main.EX32.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36881.pdf
(April 3, 2013) Letter from Charles Foran, President, PEN Canada (EX.Main.EX32.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36882.pdf
(April 6, 2013) E-mail from John Greyson (EX.Main.EX32.1.3)
(October 26, 2012) Letter from May Lui, Interim Executive Director, on behalf of Chinese Canadian National Council Toronto Chapter (EX.Main.EX32.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36884.pdf
(April 15, 2013) E-mail from Suzanne Weiss (EX.Main.EX32.1.5)
(April 12, 2013) Letter from Tamara Sabarini, Toronto Palestine Film Festival Organizing Committee (EX.Main.EX32.1.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36886.pdf
(April 18, 2013) E-mail from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh (EX.Main.EX32.1.7)
(April 19, 2013) Letter from Indu Vashist, Executive Director, South Asian Arts Centre (EX.Main.EX32.1.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36869.pdf
(April 19, 2013) E-mail from Elizabeth Block, Independent Jewish Voices (EX.Main.EX32.1.9)
(April 21, 2013) E-mail from Sriram Ananth, llian Burbanom, Katherine Nastowski, Ted Turner, Cynthia Wright, Members of Labour for Palestine-Toronto (EX.Main.EX32.1.10)
(April 21, 2013) E-mail from Dania Majid, Arab Canadian Lawyers Association (EX.Main.EX32.1.11)
(April 22, 2013) E-mail from Monira Kitmitto, Palestine House (EX.Main.EX32.1.12)
(April 20, 2013) Letter from Prabha Khosla, Toronto Women's City Alliance (EX.Main.EX32.1.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36874.pdf
(April 22, 2013) E-mail from Sue Goldstein and Naomi Binder, International Jewish Anti-Zionist Network (EX.Main.EX32.1.14)
(April 22, 2013) Letter from Joe Clark (EX.Main.EX32.1.15)
(April 22, 2013) E-mail from Art Young, Palestine House (EX.Main.EX32.1.16)
(April 22, 2013) E-mail from Deborah Mandell, Women in Solidarity with Palestine (EX.Main.EX32.1.17)
(April 22, 2013) E-mail from Wangui Kimari, York University Graduate Students (EX.Main.EX32.1.18)
(April 22, 2013) E-mail from James Campbell on behalf of Educators for Peace and Justice (EX.Main.EX32.1.19)
(April 23, 2013) Letter from J.A. MacNeil, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (EX.Main.EX32.1.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36865.pdf
(April 22, 2013) E-mail from Gary Pieters, Urban Alliance on Race Relations (EX.Main.EX32.1.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36866.pdf
(April 22, 2013) Letter from John Campey, Executive Director, Social Planning Toronto (EX.Main.EX32.1.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36867.pdf
(April 22, 2013) Letter from Henry Lowi on behalf of the Toronto Board of Directors of the United Jewish People's Order (EX.Main.EX32.1.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36863.pdf
(April 23, 2013) E-mail from Nahed Mansour (EX.Main.EX32.1.24)
(April 23, 2013) Submission from Don Schmidt (EX.Main.EX32.1.25)
(April 23, 2013) Submission from Tony Souza (EX.Main.EX32.1.26)
(April 23, 2013) Submission from Lester Brown (EX.Main.EX32.1.27)
(April 23, 2013) Submission from Nigel Barriffe (EX.Main.EX32.1.28)
(May 3, 2013) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (EX.Main.EX32.1.29)
(May 21, 2013) E-mail from Anita Block (EX.Main.EX32.1.30)
(May 21, 2013) E-mail from Sheryl Nestel (EX.Main.EX32.1.31)
(May 21, 2013) E-mail from Bernard and Gilda Katz (EX.Supp.EX32.1.32)
(May 22, 2013) E-mail from Joanna Reynolds (EX.Supp.EX32.1.33)
(May 23, 2013) E-mail from Tony Souza (EX.Supp.EX32.1.34)
(May 23, 2013) E-mail from Smadar Carmon (EX.Supp.EX32.1.35)
(May 23, 2013) E-mail from Sheila Sullivan (EX.Supp.EX32.1.36)
(May 23, 2013) E-mail from Greg Bird (EX.Supp.EX32.1.37)
(May 24, 2013) E-mail from Dianne Moore (EX.Supp.EX32.1.38)
(May 24, 2013) E-mail from Gary Kinsman (EX.Supp.EX32.1.39)
(May 24, 2013) E-mail from Robert Fung (EX.Supp.EX32.1.40)
(May 24, 2013) E-mail from Molly Kraft (EX.Supp.EX32.1.41)
(May 25, 2013) E-mail from Jackson Davidow (EX.Supp.EX32.1.42)
(May 26, 2013) E-mail from Suzanne Weiss (EX.Supp.EX32.1.43)
(May 27, 2013) E-mail from Alisa Gayle (EX.Supp.EX32.1.44)
(May 27, 2013) E-mail from Lisa Clarke, on behalf of Leo Adler (EX.New.EX32.1.45)
(May 28, 2013) E-mail from Sue Goldstein (EX.New.EX32.1.46)
(May 28, 2013) Submission from Ted Schmidt (EX.New.EX32.1.47)
(May 28, 2013) Letter from Tiphaera Ziner-Cohen, submitted by David Nitkin (EX.New.Ex32.1.48)
(May 28, 2013) Submission from Lester Brown (EX.New.EX32.1.49)
(May 28, 2013) Submission from Stacey Starkman (EX.New.EX32.1.50)
(May 28, 2013) Submission from Sam Eskanasi (EX.New.EX32.1.51)
(May 28, 2013) Submission from Hamish Wilson (EX.New.EX32.1.52)
(May 28, 2013) Submission from Paul Ross (EX.New.EX32.1.53)
(May 28, 2013) Submission from Gene Tishauer (EX.New.EX32.1.54)
(May 28, 2013) Submission from Rabbi Baruch Frydman-Kohl (EX.New.EX32.1.55)
(May 26, 2013) Letter from Andria Spindel (EX.New.EX32.1.56)
(May 28, 2013) E-mail from Jaymie (EX.New.EX32.1.57)
(May 28, 2013) E-mail from Anthony Smith (EX.New.EX32.1.58)

Communications (City Council)

(May 27, 2013) Fax from Noreen Looney and Jeff Gold (CC.Main.EX32.1.59)
(June 10, 2013) E-mail from Richard Fung (CC.New.EX32.1.60)
(May 28, 2013) Letter from J.A. MacNeil, Canadians for Justice and Peace in the Middle East (CC.New.EX32.1.61)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-38851.pdf
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Amy Casipullai, Senior Coordinator, Policy and Communications, Ontario Council of Agencies Serving Immigrants (OCASI) (CC.New.EX32.1.62)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39107.pdf

1a - Revisions to City's Grants Policy and Anti-Discrimination Policies - Legal Issues

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board
Origin
(April 8, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor
Summary

This report has been prepared to provide confidential commentary on the recent Supreme Court of Canada decision in Saskatchewan (Human Rights Commission) v. Whatcott which was released on February 27, 2013 and issues arising from the two reports which shall be before Executive Committee for its consideration on April 23, 2013 respecting proposed amendments to the City's Grants Policy and Anti-Discrimination policies arising from direction given by the Committee at its meeting of September 10, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
(April 8, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on Revisions to City's Grants Policy and Anti-Discrimination Policies - Legal Issues
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-57788.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Attachment from City Solicitor on Grants Policy and Anti-Discrimination Policies - Legal Issues

1b - Amendments to the City of Toronto Grants Policy

Origin
(April 9, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration
Summary

This report responds to Executive Committee’s directions of September 10th, 2012 to "report on amendments to the City's Grants Policy and ensure that events which are funded by the City of Toronto, and/or take place on City of Toronto property, are in accordance with the objectives of the City of Toronto of promoting respect, tolerance and diversity and that the grants guidelines and use of space guidelines are consistent with the amended grants policy." 

 

The report recommends approval of a revised City of Toronto Grants Policy that: is aligned with the revised City of Toronto Anti-Discrimination Policies (contained in a separate report from the City Manager), integrates existing guidelines on anti-discrimination, complaints, customer service, program standards and performance measures and appeals, and incorporates former stand-alone policies on financial health and partisan political activity.

 

The report advises that the City of Toronto Grants Policy does not include provisions or mechanisms that would preclude an organization from being recommended for funding due to the use of the term "Israeli Apartheid" or other language that may be considered offensive, but not contrary to the Ontario Human Rights Code or Criminal Code.

 

The report does clarify Council's ability to add conditions to funding under the policy, reaffirms the appropriate mechanisms to deal with complaints about contracted services and City-funded activity, and highlights the complexity of dealing with "competing interests" among equity-seeking groups at the municipal level.

 

The City Solicitor has also submitted a report to Executive Committee on this matter.

Issues related to Executive Committee's other directions on anti-discrimination policies will be addressed in a report from the Equity, Diversity and Human Rights Division of the City Manager's Office.

Background Information (Committee)
(April 9, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Amendments to the City of Toronto Grants Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-57790.pdf
Attachment - Appendix A - City of Toronto Community Grants Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-57791.pdf

EX32.9 - Toronto Hydro Corporation - Annual General Meeting, 2012 Audited Financial Statements and By-law 1.1

(Deferred by City Council from June 11, 2013 - 2013.EX32.9)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this item (EX32.9a with recommendations)

Communications EX32.9.1 and EX32.9.2 have been submitted on this Item

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider the portion of the Council meeting when this report is being considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Hydro Corporation by:

 

a.         adopting the recommendations of the Toronto Hydro Corporation report dated May 16, 2012 in Attachment 1 to the report (May 10, 2013) from the City Manager in order to re-appoint KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the auditor for Toronto Hydro Corporation, to authorize the Corporation’s Board of Directors to fix the auditor's remuneration, and to approve the amended By-law 1.1 of the Corporation forming Appendix B, Attachment 1, to the report (May 10, 2013) from the City Manager; and

 

b.         receiving the information report of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer dated April 22, 2013 entitled “2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Toronto Hydro Corporation” forming  Attachment 2 to the report (May 10, 2013) from the City Manager and receiving the financial statements forming Appendix A to the report (May 10, 2013) from the City Manager.

 

2.         City Council receive the report of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer entitled “2012 Annual Information Form of Toronto Hydro Corporation” forming Attachment 3 to the report (May 10, 2013) from the City Manager, for information.

 

3.         City Council receive Toronto Hydro Corporation’s 2012 Annual Report, 2012 Corporate Responsibility Report and 2012 Annual Information Form forming Attachments 4, 5 and 6 to the report (May 10, 2013) from the City Manager, for information.

 

4.         City Council refer Toronto Hydro Corporation’s 2012 Audited Consolidated Annual Financial Statements to the Audit Committee for information.

 

5.         City Council request the City Manager to include in his upcoming report on compensation for agencies and corporations, all Toronto Hydro senior executive compensation since amalgamation along with the annual dividend received.

Origin

(May 10, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) (“OBCA”) for holding an annual general meeting of the shareholder of Toronto Hydro Corporation (“THC”) including receipt of the audited annual financial statements and appointment of the auditor.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 10, 2013) Report from the City Manager on Toronto Hydro Corporation - Annual General Meeting, 2012 Audited Financial Statements and By-law 1.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58339.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Report May 16, 2012 - Appendix A - Resolution of the City of Toronto (“Sole Shareholder”) to Re-appoint the Auditor of Toronto Hydro Corporation (the “Corporation”) and to Authorize the Directors to Fix the Remuneration of the Auditor; Appendix B - Resolution of the City of Toronto (“Sole Shareholder”) to Approve Amendments to By-law 1.1 of the Corporation - Attachment 1- By-law 1.1 of Toronto Hydro Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58340.pdf
Attachment 1 to Appendix B - Resolution of the City of Toronto (“Sole Shareholder”) to Approve Amendments to By-law 1.1 of the Corporation - Attachment 1: By-law 1.1 of Toronto Hydro Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58341.pdf
Attachment 2 - Report of Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer dated April 22, 2013 entitled “2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements of Toronto Hydro Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58342.pdf
Appendix A to Attachment 2 - 2012 Audited Consolidated Annual Financial Statements of Toronto Hydro Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58348.pdf
Attachment 3 - Report of Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer entitled “2012 Annual Information Form of Toronto Hydro Corporation”
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58349.pdf
Attachment 4 - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2012 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58350.pdf
Attachment 5 Part 1 - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2012 Corporate Responsibility Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58351.pdf
Attachment 5 Part 2 - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2012 Corporate Responsibility Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58423.pdf
Attachment 6 - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2012 Annual Information Form
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-58352.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 5, 2013) Supplementary report from the City Manager on Media Reports Related to Toronto Hydro Board Personnel Matters (EX32.9a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60102.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

Communications (City Council)

(July 18, 2013) Letter from Anthony M. Haines, President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Hydro (CC.New.EX32.9.1)
(July 18, 2013) Submission from Councillor Janet Davis (CC.New.EX32.9.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39155.pdf

PG24.1 - Proposed Amendment to Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code with Respect to 486 Evans Avenue

(Deferred by City Council from June 11, 2013 - 2013.PG24.1)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Communications PG24.1.2 to PG24.1.3 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council refuse the application to amend Chapter 694 to allow, on the premises municipally known as 486 Evans Avenue, one third party ground sign at a height of 13.72 metres and set back 1.0 metres from the northerly property line, containing two sign faces, each displaying electronic static copy, each 14.63 metres wide by 4.27 metres long, and oriented easterly and westerly along the F.G. Gardiner Expressway.

Origin

(April 25, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building

Summary

This report recommends the refusal of an application made by CBS Outdoor Canada (the "Applicant) on behalf of the owner of premises municipally known as 486 Evans Avenue, for a site specific amendment to permit the erection and display of one third party ground sign, with two sign faces, each displaying electronic static copy (the "Proposed Electronic Static Sign").

 

The Proposed Electronic Static Sign would contain two sign faces, arranged in a "V-shaped" formation facing north-east and north-west towards the F.G. Gardiner Expressway.

 

Staff recommend that this application be refused pending the results of an ongoing study on electronic signs that is expected to be completed in September 2013 which will shape future regulations around this type of signage. The refusal recommendation is also due to the incompatibility of the sign with the development of the surrounding properties and its proximity to the F. G. Gardiner Expressway and the potential impact on traffic.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Proposed Amendment to Chapter 694 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code with Respect to 486 Evans Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-58183.pdf
Attachment 1 - Proponent's Submission Materials
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-58184.pdf

Speakers

Roy Dzeko, CBS Outdoor Canada
Michele Erskine, CBS Outdoor Canada
Stephen McGregor, CBS Outdoor Canada

Communications (Committee)

(May 15, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke Lakeshore (PG.New.PG24.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-37386.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 6, 2013) Submission from Stephen McGregor, National Director, Real Estate, CBS Outdoor Canada (CC.Supp.PG24.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-38916.pdf
(July 18, 2013) E-mail from Stephen McGregor, National Director, Real Estate, CBS Outdoor Canada (CC.New.PG24.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39168.pdf

PG24.3 - Supplemental Report - Amendments to Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code with Respect to a Portion of 0 Oakville Sub (S/S of F. G. Gardiner Expressway; E/O Park Lawn Road)

(Deferred by City Council from June 11, 2013 - 2013.PG24.3)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee forwards the item to Council without recommendation, as the motion to adopt the item as amended lost.

Origin

(May 2, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building

Summary

At its meeting of November 8, 2012, the Planning and Growth Management Committee requested that the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the illumination, the angle, and the height of the sign located 8.0 metres south of the F.G. Gardiner Expressway’s right-of-way, east of Park Lawn Road at Oakville Sub on CN Railway lands, as shown on Figure 1.

 

Currently the sign displays electronic images and operates 24 hours a day with no restrictions on brightness and light cast onto adjacent properties.  This report recommends approval of a revised proposal by Astral Media (the "Applicant") for a site-specific amendment that would allow the existing sign to remain at its current height and continue to operate 24 hours a day with a reduction in the brightness of the sign and light cast onto adjacent properties.

 

The Applicant's revised proposal would also reduce the brightness of seven other electronic signs operated by Astral Media, approved prior to the effective date of the new

Sign By-law.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 2, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Supplemental Report - Amendments to Chapter 694 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code with Respect to a Portion of 0 Oakville Sub (S/S of F. G. Gardiner Expressway; E/O Park Lawn Road)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-58180.pdf
Attachment 1 - Supplementary Application Material Submitted by Astral Media
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-58181.pdf
Attachment 2 - Draft By-law - To Permit One Ground Sign Displaying Electronic Static Copy Located at 0 Oakville Sub
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-58182.pdf

Speakers

Ron Hutchinson, Senior Vice President, Real Estate Ontario, Astral Media

Executive Committee - Meeting 33

EX33.2 - Quality Jobs, Living Wages and Fair Wages in Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 67, Fair Wage, to increase the Schedule C General Classification rates, which include wage rates for workers performing cleaning services, to prevailing market rates as set out in Appendix A to the report (April 9, 2013) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Manager, Fair Wage Office, for new Tenders, Requests for Quotation, Requests for Proposals, Purchase Orders, and Divisional Purchase Orders issued by the City after this amendment goes into effect upon the enactment of the by-law to implement this change.

 

2.         City Council direct the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management and the Chief Corporate Officer to include the mandatory requirements set out in Appendix B to the report (April 9, 2013) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Manager, Fair Wage Office – Mandatory Requirements for Custodial Services Request for Proposals in all future Request for Proposals for Custodial Services.

 

3.         City Council delegate to Division Heads the ability to approve the use of subcontractors in Custodial Services contracts where in the Division Heads' determination, the use of subcontractors is appropriate; and the Treasurer and Executive Director of Human Resources develop training and guidelines for Division Heads in order to assist them in determining when it is appropriate to approve the use of subcontractors.

 

4.         City Council delegate the authority to award contracts for custodial services subject to the limits and conditions set out in Chapter 195 of the Toronto Municipal Code, Purchasing.

 

5.         City Council  approve the necessary amendments to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 67, Fair Wage to authorize the delegation of authority to the Fair Wage Manager to update Schedule C of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 67, Fair Wage from time to time as follows:

 

a.         The Industrial, Commercial and Institutional, Road Building, Sewer and Watermain, Heavy Construction, and Utility divisions of  Schedule C shall be updated every three years consistent with the construction industry prevailing market rates commencing in 2013 for new Tenders, Requests for Quotation, Requests for Proposals, Purchase Orders, and Divisional Purchase Orders issued by the City;

 

b.         Subsequent to the 2013 update set out in Recommendation 1 of the report (April 9, 2013) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Manager, Fair Wage Office, the General Classifications division of Schedule C shall be updated every three years to reflect current market wage rates prevailing in such industries for new Tenders, Requests for Quotation, Requests for Proposals, Purchase Orders, and Divisional Purchase Orders issued by the City; and

 

c.         Utilizing 2013 as the base year, the update every three years to Schedule C shall be effective on June 1st of the update year.

 

6.         City Council, to implement Recommendations 1 and 5 above, direct the City Solicitor, in consultation with the City Clerk and the Manager, Fair Wage Office to review Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 67, Fair Wage to determine the best  method to file, post and notify the public and potential contractors of any new rate changes made to Schedule C under the delegated authority, and the deleted Fair Wage Schedules remain on file and in force for those contracts issued before the effective date of the new Fair Wage Schedules.

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce to Council any bills necessary to amend Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 67, Fair Wage to implement the recommendations in the report (April 9, 2013) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Manager, Fair Wage Office, that are adopted by Council.

 

8.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, in collaboration with the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to report in late 2013 on a job quality assessment tool that includes a living wage standard and considers skills and training opportunities, working conditions, and other determinants of job quality.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee referred the following motion to the Manager, Fair Wage Office, for a report back to the Executive Committee in late 2013:

 

            Motion 3 by Councillor Ainslie

 

            "That City Council require or request where legally appropriate that the City's Fair Wage Policy be adopted by all City Agencies."

Origin

(April 9, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management and the Manager, Fair Wage Office

Summary

This report responds to seven Council directions approved as a part of the report titled Council-Directed Follow Up to Community Development Committee Item CD10.2 – the Social Impact of Lower Wage Jobs (April 2012).  These Council directions all address a common theme:  the quality of jobs created through the City's contracting processes, particularly in custodial services contracts.

 

The report provides an overview of job quality issues in the service sector generally and in the cleaning industry specifically.  Because of the important role that wages play in determining job quality, the report also describes the difference between "minimum wage", "fair wage" and "living wage" standards.

 

The report recommends a series of actions to ensure the quality of jobs created through the City's contracting processes.  To address job quality issues in custodial service contracts, the report makes two recommendations:

 

-           Immediate updates to the General Classifications Wage Schedule of the Fair Wage Policy to reflect current, prevailing fair market wages for the jobs covered by this schedule, including workers in the cleaning services industry.  The Schedule currently reflects 2003/4 rates, and includes rates below the legislated Provincial Minimum Wage;

 

-           Immediate updates to the mandatory requirements proponents must meet when they compete for City custodial service contracts.  The recommended requirements reflect industry best practices, and will help ensure that the City receives quality services and supports quality jobs.

 

With new mandatory requirements in place for custodial services contracts and fair market wages in place for custodial workers, this report recommends that Council restore delegated authorities for the approval of custodial service contracts:

 

-           Restoring the authority of Division Heads to approve the appropriate use of subcontracting in custodial service contracts; and

 

-           Restoring the authority of Bid Committee and Division Heads to approve contracts for custodial services subject to the conditions and procedures provided for in Chapter 195 of the Toronto Municipal Code.

 

These delegated authorities were suspended by Council in its adoption of Council-Directed Follow Up to Community Development Committee Item CD10.2 – the Social Impact of Lower Wage Jobs in April 2012.

 

Finally, this report recommends two additional actions to ensure quality jobs are created through the City's contracting process on an ongoing basis:

 

-           Providing the Manager, Fair Wage Office with the delegated authority to update the Schedules of the Fair Wage Policy on a regular basis.  These schedules establish minimum rates that contractors with the City must pay their workers, and were last updated in 2003.  By delegating this authority, Council will ensure that the Schedules are always current; and

 

-           Joint work by Economic Development and Culture, Employment and Social Services, and Social Development, Finance and Administration to develop and report on a job quality assessment tool.   Such a tool would include a living wage standard and consider other dimensions of job quality, including skills and training opportunities, and working conditions.  It would allow the City to assess job quality in a number of areas, including the quality of jobs secured for residents through Working as One: A Workforce Development Strategy; the quality of jobs created through Collaborating for Competitiveness: A Strategic Plan for Accelerating Economic Growth and Job Creation in Toronto; and the quality of jobs held by residents in Neighbourhood Improvement Areas identified under Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 9, 2013) Report with Appendices A, B, C and E from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management and the Manager, Fair Wage Office
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-57801.pdf
Appendix D - International Sanitary Standards Association - Cleaning Industry Management Standards for Green Buildings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-57799.pdf
Appendix F - Working for a Living Wage: Making Paid Work Meet Basic Family Needs in Metro Vancouver (2012)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-57800.pdf
Comparison of Existing and Proposed Changes to Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 67, Fair Wage, Schedule C, General Classifications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-60023.pdf

Speakers

Jenny Carson (Submission Filed)
Anne Creighton, Labourers Local 183
Michelynn Lafleche, Director, Research & Public Policy, United Way of Greater Toronto
Tim Maguire, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 79
Sheila Block, The Wellesley Institute
Nicole Mihajlovic, Parkdale Community Legal Services (PCLS) (Submission Filed)
Councillor Ana Bailăo
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Frances Nunziata
Councillor Adam Vaughan

Communications (Committee)

(April 22, 2013) E-mail from John Cartwright, President, Toronto and York Region Labour Council (EX.Main.EX33.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36586.pdf
(April 23, 2013) Letter from Lisa Marie Williams, Research Assistant, Wellesley Institute (EX.Main.EX33.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36585.pdf
(April 23, 2013) Letter from Nancy Murphy, First Vice-President, CUPE Local 79 (EX.Main.EX33.2.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36587.pdf
(April 22, 2013) Letter from Mary Gellatly, Workers Rights Division, Parkdale Community Legal Services (EX.Main.EX33.2.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36591.pdf
(April 23, 2013) Letter from Linda Rose (EX.Main.EX33.2.5)
(April 23, 2013) Letter from Julio Silva (EX.Main.EX33.2.6)
(April 23, 2013) Letter from Deena Ladd, Coordinator, Workers' Action Centre (EX.Main.EX33.2.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36589.pdf
(April 23, 2013) Submission from David F. McDonald (EX.Main.EX33.2.8)
(April 23, 2013) Letter from Navjeet Sidhu, Social Planning Toronto (EX.Main.EX33.2.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-36590.pdf
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Peter Clarke (EX.Supp.EX33.2.10)
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from John Cartwright, President, Toronto and York Region Labour Council (EX.Supp.EX33.2.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38834.pdf
(July 3, 2013) E-mail from Tim Maguire, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 79 (EX.New.EX33.2.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38866.pdf
(July 3, 2013) Submission from Jenny Carson (EX.New.EX33.2.13)
(July 3, 2013) Submission from Nicole Mihajlovic, filed submission for Mary Gellatly, Parkdale Legal Services Inc. (EX.New.EX33.2.14)

EX33.3 - Authorization for the 2014 Municipal Election Contribution Rebate Program By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council establish a contribution rebate program for the 2014 municipal election, and:

 

a.         Pass a by-law substantially in the form of the draft bill attached as Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Clerk.

 

b.         Increase funding from the non-program account to the Elections Reserve Fund XR1017, by $0.4 million to $1.2 million per annum beginning in 2014, to pay for the program.

 

c.         Direct that any election campaign surplus funds that become the property of the City according to the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 be deposited into the Elections Reserve Fund XR1017, in accordance with section 14 of the draft bill attached as Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Clerk.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

To assist candidates to fund their campaigns, the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 ("MEA") prescribes that a municipality may, by by-law, authorize a contribution rebate program for the payment of rebates to individual who contribute to candidates for office on municipal council.  The MEA does not allow other alternative campaign funding or grant programs.  

 

Should Council decide to implement a contribution rebate program for the 2014 election, it is recommended that the program parameters be the same as those for the 2010 election with one exception.  The exception would require a candidate to close their campaign before rebates are paid to their contributors.  This will prevent the City from having to recover overpayments identified in the supplementary filing.  This by-law will only apply to contributions made to candidates in the 2014 regular election.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report with Appendices A to C, from the City Clerk on Authorization for the 2014 Municipal Election Contribution Rebate Program By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59639.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Shelley Carroll

EX33.4 - 2014 Election Advance Vote and Voting Hours By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bills 1164 and 1165 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the dates and hours of advance voting for the 2014 election as follows:

 

a.         Tuesday, October 14, 2014 to Sunday, October 19, 2014, inclusive, from 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.

 

b.         Pass a by-law substantially in the form of the draft bill attached as Appendix "A" of the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Clerk.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The Municipal Elections Act, 1996 ("MEA") provides Council with the authority to pass certain election by-laws, including the establishment of the dates and hours for the advance vote and voting hours on election day.

 

This report recommends that Council pass a by-law to establish the dates and hours for the advance vote.  This is a mandatory by-law that Council must pass before each election and by-election.  A copy of the proposed bill is attached in Appendix "A" to this report. 

 

There are significant legal and practical limitations when determining the beginning and end of the advance vote period, as well as the dates and hours.  The Clerk must have adequate time between the end of advance vote and election day to update, verify, format, print and distribute the voters' list to all 1,500+ voting places on election day.  The Clerk must also have sufficient time between the end of nomination day and the beginning of the advance vote to produce and test 220 different ballot styles on the voting equipment.  Finally, the Clerk must schedule reasonable days and hours to avoid the risk of voting place worker fatigue, resulting in increased administrative errors.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report with Appendix A, from the City Clerk on 2014 Election Advance Vote and Voting Hours By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59641.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Adam Vaughan

EX33.5 - Recipients - 2013 Access Equity and Human Rights Awards

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council extend congratulations to the following who have been selected as recipients of the 2013 City of Toronto Access, Equity and Human Rights Awards:

 

            Aboriginal Affairs Award:  Steven Vanloffeld

            Access Award:  Lucy Costa

            Pride Award:  Sherbourne Health Centre

            William P. Hubbard Award:  Samuel Getachew

Origin

(June 14, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report advises Council of the result of the nomination process for the City of Toronto Access, Equity and Human Rights Awards. These Awards are the Aboriginal Affairs Award, the Access Award on Disability Issues, the Constance E. Hamilton Award on the Status of Women, the Pride Award for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Transsexual and Two Spirited Issues and the William P. Hubbard Race Relations Award. 

 

The recipient of the Constance E. Hamilton Award is selected by the Women Members of Council and will be a separate sub item to this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 14, 2013) Report from the City Manager on Recipients - 2013 Access Equity and Human Rights Awards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59668.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 24, 2013) E-mail from Constance E. Hamilton Award Selection Committee (EX.Main.EX33.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38641.pdf

EX33.6 - Occupational Health and Safety Report - End of Year 2012

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the End of Year 2012 Occupational Health and Safety Report.

 

2.         City Council request the City Manager to endeavour to obtain yearly worker compensation statistics from the waste management company under contract with the City.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee

Summary

This report provides information on the status of the City’s health and safety system, specifically on activities, priorities and performance during the third and fourth quarters of 2012, and health and safety performance throughout the year.

 

There was a 2.3% decrease in the number of lost time injuries in 2012 relative to 2011.  In 2012 versus 2011, there was an increase in both the number of medical aid injuries (5.0%) and recurrences (30.7%).  WSIB invoiced costs for 2012 were approximately $2.2 million lower than in 2011. This improvement reflects reduced injury severity and effectiveness of return-to-work efforts. The WSIB cost decrease was achieved in 2012 despite an increase in the WSIB's administration rate from 22.2 % in 2011 to 27.6% in 2012. The overall decrease in WSIB costs over the time period from 2008 to 2012 is approximately $9.2 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 27, 2013) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Occupational Health and Safety Report - End of Year 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59558.htm
(April 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager, and the Executive Director, Human Resources on Occupational Health and Safety Report - End of Year 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59552.pdf
Appendix A - WSIB Claims Data, by Division (January - December)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59553.pdf
Appendix B - LTI Frequency
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59554.pdf
Appendix C - WSIB Costs for all Firm Numbers (2008-2012)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59555.pdf
Appendix D(i) - WSIB Invoiced Costs <$50,000 (2008-2012)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59556.pdf
Appendix D(ii) - WSIB Invoiced Costs >$50,000 (2008-2012)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59551.pdf
(May 27, 2013) Presentation from the Director, Occupational Health and Safety on the March to Target Zero: 2013 Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59557.pdf

EX33.7 - Occupational Health and Safety Report - 1st Quarter 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the 1st Quarter 2013 Occupational Health and Safety Report for information.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee

Summary

This report provides information on the status of the City’s health and safety system, specifically on activities, priorities, health and safety performance during the first quarter of 2013.

 

There was a 19.5% decrease in the number of lost time injuries (LTIs), a 54.5% decrease in the number of recurrences and a 3.9% decrease in the number of medical aid only injuries during the first quarter of 2013 relative to 2012.  

 

WSIB invoiced costs for the first quarter of 2013 were approximately $6.89 million, $297 thousand higher than in 2012. This increase is attributable to a significantly higher Workplace Safety and Insurance Board revised administration rate (35.8% in 2013 versus 27.6% in 2012) and an increase in costs of firefighter cancer claims.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 27, 2013) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Occupational Health and Safety Report - 1st Quarter 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59398.htm
(May 3, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources on Occupational Health and Safety Report - 1st Quarter 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59308.pdf
Appendix A - First Quarter WSIB Incident Data by Division
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59309.pdf
Appendix B - Toronto Public Service LTI Frequency (1st Quarters, 2009-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59307.pdf
Appendix C - Summary of WSIB Costs for all Firm Numbers (1st Quarters 2009-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59310.pdf
Appendix D(i) - 1st Quarter WSIB Invoiced Costs (<$100,000)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59311.pdf
Appendix D(ii) - 1st Quarter WSIB Invoiced Costs (>$100,000)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59312.pdf

EX33.8 - Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2012

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council treat the Council meeting at which the report (June 17, 2013) from the City Manager is considered as the 2012 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Build Toronto Inc. by:

 

a.         Receiving the Annual Report 2012 of Build Toronto Inc., which includes 2012 Audited Financial Statements, Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2013) from the City Manager;

 

b.         Appointing Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Build Toronto Inc. for fiscal year 2013, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Build Toronto to fix the remuneration of such Auditor; and

 

c.         Receiving the report of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer titled "Build Toronto Inc. - 2012 Audited Financial Statements," Attachment 2 to the report (June 17, 2013) from the City Manager.

 

2.         City Council forward a copy of the Annual Report 2012 of Build Toronto Inc., which includes 2012 Audited Financial Statements, Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2013) from the City Manager, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3.         City Council receive the information of Attachment 3, of the report (June 17, 2013) from the City Manager, concerning executive compensation disclosure for information.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee referred the following motions to the Build Toronto Board of Directors and the City Manager, and requested the City Manager, in consultation with the Build Toronto Board of Directors, to report to the Executive Committee on December 5, 2013.

 

            Motion 1 by Councillor Ainslie

 

"That City Council request that in the future, Annual General Meetings the Board of Directors of Build Toronto should outline annually the succession planning process for senior management positions."

 

Motion 2 by Councillor Ainslie

 

"That City Council request that, with regard to Named Executive Officers (NEO) Compensation, the Human Resource and Corporate Governance (HRCG) Committee and Board of Directors should review further performance options, which include deferral of a portion of performance compensation to every 2 to 3 years to reflect a longer term performance evaluation.  This longer term evaluation should also include key balance sheet metrics including return on capital."

 

Motion 3 by Councillor Ainslie

 

"That City Council request that in the future, audited financial statements Build Toronto should clearly outline Build Toronto's balance sheet metrics including return on assets, equity, and invested capital."

Origin

(June 17, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the 2012 Annual General Meeting of the shareholder of Build Toronto Inc. including receipt of 2012 Audited Financial Statements and appointment of the auditor for 2013. This report also transmits documents from Build Toronto Inc. to City Council disclosing the compensation of executive officers employed by the corporation in 2012.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2013) Report from the City Manager on Build Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59629.pdf
Attachment 1 - Annual Report 2012 of Build Toronto Inc.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59630.pdf
Attachment 2 - Report of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer titled "Build Toronto Inc. - 2012 Audited Financial Statements"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59631.pdf
Attachment 3 - Build Toronto - 2012 Executive Compensation Discussion and Analysis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59632.pdf

Speakers

Lorne Braithwaite, CEO, Build Toronto

EX33.9 - Casa Loma Corporation - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2012

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council treat the Council meeting at which the report (May 29, 2013) from the City Manager is considered as the 2012 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Casa Loma Corporation by:

 

a.         receiving the 2012 Audited Financial Statements of  Casa Loma Corporation, attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 29, 2013) from the City Manager;

 

b.         appointing KMPG LLP as the Auditor of  Casa Loma Corporation for fiscal year 2013; and

 

c.         receiving Casa Loma Corporation's 2012 Annual Report attached as Attachment 2 to the report (May 29, 2013) from the City Manager.

 

2.         City Council forward a copy of the Casa Loma Corporation 2012 Audited Annual Financial Statements, in Attachment 1 to the report (May 29, 2013) from the City Manager, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3.         City Council receive the information in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (May 29, 2013) from the City Manager.

 

4.         City Council direct that the contents of Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (May 29, 2013) from the City Manager be kept confidential in their entirety after the consideration of this report by Council for reasons of personal information about identified individuals.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

Casa Loma Corporation (the Corporation) was established by City Council in June 2011. The Corporation is currently undertaking a competitive process for a third party manager of the castle, and through a separate process is investigating the potential use of other buildings, including a home for the Museum of Toronto.

 

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for the holding of the 2012 Annual General meeting of the shareholder, including receipt of the Audited Financial Statements, transmittal of the 2012 Annual Report, and confirmation of the auditor for 2013. The report also transmits the confidential disclosure of executive compensation paid by the Corporation in 2012. 

Background Information (Committee)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the City Manager on Casa Loma Corporation – Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59593.pdf
Attachment 1 - Casa Loma Corporation 2012 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59594.pdf
Attachment 2 - Casa Loma Corporation 2012 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59595.pdf
Confidential Attachment 3 - 2012 Executive Compensation Disclosure

EX33.10 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation - Annual Shareholder Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council treat the part of the Council meeting when the report (June 13, 2013) from the City Manager is considered as the annual shareholder meeting for Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) and:

 

a.         receive Toronto Community Housing Corporation's (TCHC's) 2012 Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ending December 31, 2012, and the auditor's report thereon dated April 29, 2013, forming Appendix A to Attachment 1 to the report (June 13, 2013) from the City Manager and forward a copy to the City's Audit Committee for information; and

           

b.         reappoint PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as Toronto Community Housing Corporation's (TCHC's) auditor until the next annual shareholder meeting at the fee provided therefore in the City’s agreement with that firm.

 

2.         City Council receive for information the report of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, dated June 11, 2013 and entitled "Toronto Community Housing Corporation 2012 Financial Statements", forming Attachment 1 to the report (June 13, 2013) from the City Manager.

 

3.         City Council receive for information Toronto Community Housing Corporation’s 2012 Annual Report, forming Attachment 2 to the report (June 13, 2013) from the City Manager, comprising the letter from the Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer dated April 30, 2013 and related attachments.

Origin

(June 13, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) ("OBCA") for holding an annual shareholder meeting for Toronto Community Housing Corporation (“TCHC”), including receipt of the 2012 financial statements and the auditor's report thereon and appointment of the auditor.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2013) Report from the City Manager on Toronto Community Housing Corporation - Annual General Meeting and Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59667.pdf
(June 18, 2013) Attachment 1 - Report of the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer dated June 11, 2013 and entitled “Toronto Community Housing Corporation - 2012 Financial Statements”
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59803.pdf
Appendix A to Attachment 1 - 2012 TCHC Audited Annual Consolidated Annual Financial Statements and Auditor’s Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59804.pdf
Attachment 2 - Letter dated April 30, 2013 from TCHC President and Chief Executive Officer transmitting TCHC's 2012 Annual Report, 2012 Audited Financial Statements, 2012 Eviction Statistics, 2012 Tenant Engagement Activities and 2012 Report on Sales of Standalone Properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59805.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation 2012 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59806.pdf

EX33.11 - Results of the Service and Organizational Review of Toronto Emergency Medical Services and Toronto Fire Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Chief of Toronto Emergency Medical Services to submit a business case through the 2014 and future years’ budget to add 169 paramedic positions over the next three years from 2014 through to 2016.

 

2.         City Council request the City Manager and the Chief of Toronto Emergency Medical Services to consult with the Province  of Ontario, in particular the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, regarding confirmation of 50/50 provincial cost-shared funding for paramedic positions being covered in the first year of operation.

 

3.         City Council affirm the continuation of the Community Paramedicine Program as part of a strategy to reduce call volume pressures and to provide the most appropriate mobile patient care to vulnerable Toronto communities and residents.

 

4.         City Council request the Chief of Toronto Emergency Medical Services to submit a business case through the 2014 budget process for resources to implement Lean type solutions (Six Sigma and ISO for example) to reduce hospital delays that contribute to paramedic wait times and expand Lean type solutions to both Toronto Emergency Medical Services and Toronto Fire Services to improve operational performance.

 

5.         City Council refer the following recommendations to the Fire Chief to commence or continue implementation and report further as required:

 

a.         Adopt an aggressive enforcement policy for Fire Code violations that impact upon the immediate life safety of the occupants of a building;

b.         Establish annual Fire Code Compliance inspections of high risk occupancies;

c.         Pursue mobile technology solutions to improve the efficiency of inspection and enforcement of Fire Code requirements;

d.         Train fire suppression crews on key areas of the Ontario Fire Code and utilize them to augment incident prevention and inspection activities;

e.         Establish a Policy requiring building owners to cover the full City cost to inspect premises for non-compliance of orders issued under the Ontario Fire Code; and

f.          Implement Business Intelligence reporting software and enhance business analysis capability.

 

6.         City Council request the Fire Chief to move forward with the fire accreditation process with target completion by 2015/2016.

 

7.         City Council request the Fire Chief to implement a strategy to increase the focus on prevention, public education, and inspection to reduce the incidence of fires and other emergencies and report further through 2013 and future years' Committee process as required.

 

8.         City Council request the Fire Chief to continue to implement dynamic staging and predictive modelling to improve the City’s fire deployment and determine the most strategic and service and cost efficient placement of fire resources and apparatus.

 

9.         City Council request the Fire Chief to explore an enhanced use of fire pre-emption including leveraging technology through other related traffic congestion management initiatives to improve fire response and report further as required.

 

10.       City Council refer the possible closure of station 424 at 462 Runnymede Road to the Fire Chief for further evaluation with the other 2013 budget adjustments and to report back in the fall of 2013 when reporting out the results of the Fire Underwriters Survey.

 

11.       City Council request the Fire Chief to bring forward an updated Fire Master Plan by the end of 2014, incorporating changes resulting from recommendations 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Managers, and considering the results of a City-wide risk assessment including impacts to the community fire risk profile used to establish insurance ratings.

 

12.       City Council authorize the Chief of Toronto Emergency Medical Services and the Fire Chief to undertake a further evaluation of the benefits, limitations, risks, and required investments to consolidate the communications centres and report back in 2014 on the outcomes of the evaluation.

 

13.       City Council authorize the Fire Chief to evaluate opportunities for the Toronto Fire Services Communications Centre to provide communications services to other municipalities or organizations to generate additional net revenues; and

 

14.       City Council request the City Manager and the Chief of Toronto Emergency Medical Services to consult with the Province of Ontario, in particular the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, on the level of staff and funding required for the Toronto EMS Communications Centre to meet the 2 minute call receiving and dispatch standard set by the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care.

 

15.       City Council direct that all recommendations related to future reports flow through Executive Committee in 2013 and 2014.

 

16.       City Council request the Chief, Emergency Medical Services to report on the development of a workplan, for the 2014 budget, which would ensure highrise residents receive the same response time as low rise residents of the City.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Managers

Summary

This report responds to Council's request for the City Manager to conduct a service and organizational review of Toronto EMS and Toronto Fire Services. The purpose of the review was to identify and recommend opportunities that maintain the quality of these core municipal services while achieving potential efficiencies. 

 

The review included an assessment of operational improvements, a demand and resource analysis, and an evaluation of service delivery model options including organizational consolidation.  A third party consulting firm, Pomax Ltd., in partnership with Berkshire Advisors, MGT of America and Stantec were retained through a competitive process to undertake this assignment.

 

The consultants put forward 20 recommendations for the City Manager and Deputy City Managers' consideration related to organization, resources and apparatus, prevention and education, fire inspection and enforcement, and the communications centres.  This report communicates the results of the review including the recommended disposition of each. The City Manager and Deputy City Managers recommend implementation of 14 recommendations, further due diligence be undertaken on 4 recommendations and no further action be taken on 2 recommendations. 

 

The Pomax recommendations and the report recommended disposition are summarized in Appendix A.  The Pomax Executive Summary is attached as Appendix B and their full report is attached as Appendix C.  A summary of their recommendations organized by main topic are described below.

 

Organization

 

The consultants recommend that Toronto EMS and Toronto Fire Services continue as separate organizations and concluded that a consolidated model will not yield the expected financial, operational or service benefits for Toronto given the maturity of the City’s fire and paramedic services. A firefighter-paramedic service delivery model for Toronto was also considered and not recommended given the significant start up and capital investments required with little evidence of improvement in clinical outcomes for patients.

 

Toronto EMS Resources and Apparatus

 

The consultants confirm that call demand for emergency medical response has increased by 28% over the last ten years driven by a growing and aging Toronto population.  They estimate a continued increase in call demand of 2 % to 4 % annually and identify that the City requires an additional 169 paramedics over the next three years to meet current and future demand for emergency medical response for a total increase of 220 paramedic positions including positions approved through the 2013 budget process.  This report requests authority to submit these investment requests through the 2014 and future years' budget process.

 

Based on early information, the consultants found that community paramedicine programs are expected to slow the growth of event volume for emergency medical response and transport of patients that have not had the benefit of preventative care.  The consultants confirm that the Toronto EMS Community Paramedicine Program provides good value at a relatively low cost to the City and recommends its continuation.

 

Toronto Fire Services Resources and Apparatus

 

The review identifies improvements in the deployment of fire resources and apparatus through the use of dynamic staging and predictive modelling.  Section 3D of this report provides further information related to dynamic staging and predictive modelling.  A predictive modelling project for Toronto Fire Services was approved in the 2013 Capital Budget and a procurement process is underway to purchase this technology.  This report requests that the Fire Chief continue to implement dynamic staging and predictive modelling to determine the most strategic and efficient deployment of fire resources and apparatus. 

 

The consultants suggest that the City use fire traffic pre-emption more effectively to improve fire response times.  Traffic control pre-emption gives emergency response vehicles a green light at specific signalized intersections and has shown to improve fire response times and reduce the risk of collision involving response vehicles, particularly in congested areas.  This report requests the Fire Chief to explore expanding the use of traffic pre-emption in Toronto including leveraging technology investments through related City Transportation Division congestion management initiatives including the Traffic Congestion Management Action Plan and consideration of Intelligent Transportation Systems. 

 

The consultants confirm that demand for fire response (actual fires and false alarms) has remained flat or declined over the last ten years and that the number of actual fires has also declined even though the population has increased. The consultants identify that there are options available to reconfigure fire resources and apparatus to achieve efficiencies while continuing to provide similar response coverage and outline the possibility of reducing vehicles and stations.  Reconfiguring fire resources and apparatus should be carefully considered through a detailed risk assessment including changes to the community risk profile used to establish insurance rates.

 

The City Manager and the Deputy City Managers agree that there are opportunities to rationalize and realign the distribution of fire resources and apparatus to achieve efficiencies over the longer term particularly as improvements to fire deployment come on line and enhancements to public education and prevention programs are implemented. 

 

The City Manager and the Deputy City Managers also agree that reconfiguring fire resources and apparatus requires further evaluation including a detailed risk assessment and consideration of implications to Toronto’s insurance ratings and impacts on service levels. This report recommends that the Fire Chief undertake further evaluation to reconfigure fire resources and apparatus and bring forward changes through an updated Ten-Year Fire Master Plan in 2014 considering the results of the Fire Underwriters Survey and the outcomes of a City-wide risk assessment.

 

The Fire Underwriters Survey (FUS) is currently underway and the possible closure of station 424 and additional reductions proposed through the 2013 budget process will be considered in their analysis.  The Fire Chief anticipates reporting out the results of the FUS in the fall of 2013 in preparation for the 2014 budget.

 

Fire Inspection and Enforcement

 

The review identifies that investment in inspection and enforcement in other jurisdictions has shown to reduce false fire alarms, property loss and loss of life and injury to both private citizens and firefighters over time.  They suggest that the City adopt a more aggressive enforcement strategy to reduce building code infractions particularly in areas posing the greatest risk to people and property and put forward a number of specific operational improvements.  Many of the improvements the consultants put forward are already being implemented including the establishment of a Fire Investigation Team in 2013.  This report refers the fire inspection and enforcement improvements to the Fire Chief to commence or continue implementation and report further as required.

 

Fire Prevention and Education

 

The consultants found that there is better value for money when emergency services focus on preventing emergencies and mitigating the City’s risk to fire and other emergencies.  They highlight that prevention and education programs assist in taking pressure off the emergency response system and may reduce emergency response demand over time.

 

The consultants emphasize that when reconfiguring fire resources and apparatus to achieve efficiencies, changes should be planned in conjunction with enhanced prevention, education and inspection services to reduce the incidence of fires occurring in the first place. They suggest enhancements in prevention and education which may reduce demand for emergency fire response over the longer term particularly when considering reductions to fire resources and apparatus. 

 

Enhancements to the City’s fire prevention and education programs were approved through the 2013 Operating Budget and are currently being implemented.  The City’s fire education and activities are also currently being evaluated through the Fire Underwriters Survey.  This report refers the fire prevention related recommendations to the Fire Chief for further evaluation and to report back as required.

 

Update the City's Fire Master Plan

 

Many of the Pomax recommendations related to fire resources and apparatus, inspection and enforcement and prevention and education highlight the need to update the Fire Master Plan.  The City’s Fire Master Plan was last reviewed and updated in 2007.

 

An updated Fire Master Plan for Toronto will integrate the current and planned improvements across all fire programs and services and be aligned with the updated Official Plan to ensure that fire requirements resulting from growth are considered.   This report requests the Fire Chief to bring forward an updated Fire Master Plan by the end of 2014 incorporating changes resulting from the adoption of recommendations 5 through 9 of this report (related to fire response, prevention and education and inspection and enforcement) and considering the results of a City-wide risk assessment including impacts to the community fire risk profile used to establish insurance ratings.

 

Toronto Fire Services is also moving forward with accreditation through the Centre for Public Safety Excellence.  The Accreditation Program, administered by the Commission of Fire Accreditation International (CFAI), enables emergency response providers to use an accreditation process to set goals, develop strategic action plans and continuously evaluate and improve services provided to the public.  The accreditation process involves examining performance across 10 categories, 44 criteria and 253 key performance indicators (KPIs).  The results of the accreditation process will also inform the development of an updated Fire Master Plan including ensuring that it is based on leading industry practices.  This report recommends that the Fire Chief move forward with the fire accreditation process with a target completion of 2015/2016.

 

Communications Centres

 

The consultants did not recommend that the City pursue a consolidated communications centre and identified the cost of cross training, required technology investments, collective agreement issues and variations in funding models as key barriers to integration.  The City Manager and Deputy City Managers do not agree that these barriers are insurmountable and recommend additional due diligence be undertaken to explore this further for future consolidation opportunities.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Managers on Results of the Service and Organizational Review of Toronto Emergency Management Services (EMS) and Toronto Fire Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59627.pdf
Appendix A - Disposition of Pomax Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59901.pdf
Appendix B - Pomax Executive Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59902.pdf
Appendix C - Pomax Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59903.pdf

Speakers

Tony Araujo (Submission Filed)
Geoff MacBride, President, Paramedics Association of Toronto
Robert Boyd, Member, Toronto Paramedic Association
Councillor Adam Vaughan

Communications (Committee)

(July 3, 2013) Submission from Geoff MacBride (EX.New.EX33.11.1)
(July 3, 2013) Submission from Tony Araujo (EX.New.EX33.11.2)

EX33.12 - Toronto Fire Services - A Path to Diversity

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX33.12a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the item for information.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee requested the Chief, Toronto Fire, to report directly to the July 16, 2013 meeting of Council outlining the long-term goals related to this report.

Origin

(June 17, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

At its meeting of January 15, 2013, City Council directed the Fire Chief/General Manager, Toronto Fire Services consult with the Chief of Police regarding the framework, structure and successes of the Toronto Police Diversity hiring program; to prepare an update to the Toronto Fire Diversity hiring program; and to report to the Executive Committee by the end of the second quarter of 2013 with a plan on how to increase the diversity within Toronto Fire Services to better reflect the population of Toronto.

 

This report outlines Toronto Fire Services' (TFS) plan to increase workforce diversity, which includes an increase in the number of women and racially diverse personnel in TFS, by ten per cent by the end of 2014. This report also addresses steps taken by TFS to increase diversity in recruitment, employment and to assist employees in overcoming identified barriers.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on Toronto Fire Services - A Path to Diversity
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59656.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 15, 2013) Supplementary report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on the Toronto Fire Services - Long Term Diversity Goals (EX33.12a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60272.pdf
Appendix A to Supplementary report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services on the Toronto Fire Services - Long Term Diversity Goals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60290.pdf

EX33.13 - Toronto Pan/Parapan Am Games Host City Showcase Program and Major Special Event Reserve Fund

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications EX33.13.7 and EX33.13.8 have been submitted on this Item

Bill 1103 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse the TORONTO 2015 Pan American / Parapan American Games Host City Showcase Program and initiatives outlined in this report with anticipated gross expenditures of up to $20M, and direct the City Manager, Deputy City Managers and Division and Agency Heads to include the necessary additional funding and the following Showcase Program elements, as required, for consideration as part of the 2014 and 2015 operating and capital budget processes:

 

a.         Pan/Parapan Am Games Public Celebration and Cultural Festival in Nathan Phillips Square – up to $2.500M in operating funding, with funding earmarked in the base Economic Development and Culture division budget.

 

b.         Host City Welcome and Engagement Program (Residents, Visitors and Businesses) – up to $2.700M in operating funding, funded from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund.

 

c.         Sixteen (16) Host City Showcase Initiatives listed in Appendices C, D and E – up to $6.228M ($3.030M operating, $3.198M capital), funded from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund (or other sources) in order to support City economic development and tourism, sport development and healthy living, and resident engagement and cultural celebration objectives.

 

d.         Other potential Host City Showcase Program Investment Opportunities –up to $8.572M, funded from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund.

 

2.         City Council approve the use of Nathan Phillips Square as a venue and site for Pan/Parapan Am Games festival/celebration and ceremony purposes, and authorize the City Manager to negotiate, approve and execute agreements on the City's behalf with TO2015, the Province of Ontario, and/or other entities related to the planning, design, programming and delivery of a Public Celebration and Cultural Festival, and ceremonies, in Nathan Phillips Square (and, as appropriate, other locations), to be held in conjunction with the TORONTO 2015 Games.

 

3.         City Council approve the Pan Am Path initiative detailed in Appendix C to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager with gross and net total expenditures of $1.900M ($0.400M operating, $1.500M capital), and:

 

a.         Amend the Council-approved 2013 Capital Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation to create a new capital project called Pan Am Path in the amount of $1.200 million with cash flow of $0.075 million in 2013, $0.850 million in 2014 and $0.275 million in 2015 funded from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund.

 

b.         Amend the Council-approved 2013 Capital Budget for Transportation Services to create a new capital project called Pan Am Path in the amount of $0.300 million with cash flow of $0.050 million in 2013, $0.200 million in 2014 and $0.050 million in 2015 funded from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund.

 

c.         Amend the Council-approved 2013 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation to establish a provision for the Pan Am Path initiative that requires $0.050 million in 2013 with additional funding of $0.200 million in 2014 and $0.150 million in 2015 to be included in the 2014 and 2015 Parks, Forestry and Recreation operating budget submission for consideration, for total operating funding of $0.400 million, to be funded from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund.

 

4.         City Council approve the Wayfinding Strategy Pilot initiative detailed in Appendix D to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager with total gross expenditures of $0.800M and anticipated net expenditures of $0.600M ($0.300M operating, $0.300M capital), and:

 

a.         Amend the Council-approved 2013 Capital Budget for Transportation Services to create a new capital project called Wayfinding Strategy Pilot (Pedestrian Safety & Infrastructure CTP713-10) in the amount of $0.300 million with cash flow of $0.150 million in 2013 and $0.150 million in 2014 funded by $0.300 million from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund.

 

b.         Confirm the existing Council approved transfer of $0.150 million in 2013 and $0.150 million in 2014 from the Public Realm Reserve Fund to Economic Development and Culture for the development of the Mapping asset portion of the Wayfinding Strategy.

 

c.         Amend the Council-approved 2013 Operating Budget for Transportation Services to establish a provision for the Wayfinding Strategy Pilot that requires $0.050 million in 2013 with additional funding of $0.150 million to be included in the 2014 Transportation Services Operating Budget submission for consideration, for total operating funding of $0.200 million, to be funded from third party contributions.

 

5.         City Council direct City officials to use the criteria outlined in Appendix B to inform the assessment of any potential Host City Showcase Program investment opportunities, exclusive of the Pan Am Path and Wayfinding Strategy as recommended in recommendations 3 and 4, and include, as appropriate, any such proposals in the 2014 or 2015 operating and/or capital budget processes for Council's consideration

 

6.         City Council establish a new "Major Special Event Reserve Fund" as a discretionary reserve fund, initially for the purpose of funding components of a TORONTO 2015 Pan American / Parapan American Games Host City Showcase Program and thereafter to provide funding and budget stabilization for the non-recurring bidding, municipal service delivery and enhanced City programming costs associated with major special events, in accordance with the criteria set out in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager by:

 

a.         Amending Municipal Code Chapter 227 (Reserves and Reserve Funds) by adding the "Major Special Event Reserve Fund" to Schedule 7 (Corporate Discretionary Reserve Funds), with criteria as set out in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager.

 

b.         Funding the "Major Special Event Reserve Fund" in an initial amount of $12.200M from the 2012 operating surplus.

 

7.         City Council, given that the Prince Edward Viaduct illumination project satisfies the criteria in Appendix B for the other Host City Showcase Program opportunities and that it will not, according to a study dated May 24, 2013 by ARUP North America Ltd., create any significant detrimental visual impacts:

 

a.         Authorize the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to enter into an agreement with Dereck Revington Studio for the detailed design and costing of the Prince Edward Viaduct illumination project; the engineering schematic drawings and cost analysis;

 

b.         Authorize expenditures of up to $0.200M, and corresponding adjustments to the approved 2013 Capital Budget for Economic Development & Culture, for engineering, design and cost studies for the Prince Edward Viaduct illumination project, with funding from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund; and

 

c.         Provided that the project can be substantially completed in advance of the 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games, direct appropriate City divisions to include the Prince Edward Viaduct illumination project in 2014 Operating and/or Capital Budget submissions, in an amount up to $1.600M with funding from the Major Special Event Reserve Fund or other sources.

 

8.         City Council request the Mayor to establish a Toronto Pan/Parapan Am Games reference group, consisting of 5 Members of Council, to provide advice to the Mayor and leadership on outreach and engagement with the South and Central American and Caribbean Communities.

 

9.         City Council designate the three Civic theatres - St Lawrence Centre for the Arts, Toronto Centre for the Performing Arts and the Sony Centre as official City of Toronto entertainment venues as part of the Host City Show Case for the 2015 Pan/ Parapan Am Games.

 

10.       City Council direct that the City promote programming in the Civic theatres during the 2015 Games, and investigate use of the theatres' sponsorship, donations, marketing, ticketing and programming resources.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

In a little over two years, Toronto will host the TORONTO 2015 Pan American / Parapan American Games, the largest international multi-sport event (measured by number of participating athletes and sport competitions) ever held in Canada. The Games are expected to draw 10,000 athletes and officials and up to 250,000 visitors to the Toronto region. Training and competition venues for the 51 sports that will be featured at the TORONTO 2015 Games will be located in 13 municipalities across the Greater Golden Horseshoe.

 

To take full advantage of the opportunities this significant event presents – and to protect and strengthen Toronto's international brand and reputation – this report outlines the anticipated benefits, costs and elements of a Pan/Parapan Am Games Host City Showcase Program for the City of Toronto. A description of sound public policy criteria and processes used to support the identification and evaluation of Host City Showcase Program initiatives is also provided.

 

The four main elements of the proposed $15.428M Pan Am Games Host City Showcase Program include:

 

-           a commitment of up to $2.500M for a Public Celebration & Cultural Festival in Nathan Phillips Square;

 

-           an investment of up to $2.700 M for a Host City Welcome & Engagement Program to support Games related marketing and communication activities, and enhanced visitor and business services;

 

-           funding of up to $6.228M for 16 innovative projects which will leverage the profile of the Games to advance City Council endorsed objectives related to (i) economic development and tourism, (ii) sport development and healthy living, and (iii) resident engagement and cultural celebration; and

 

-           flexibility to invest up to an additional $4.000M over the next two years in other Host City Showcase Program initiatives championed by the City or Games partners, subject to the development of business cases, evaluation using criteria outlined in this report, and final review and consideration by City Council.

 

Implementing the Host City Showcase Program recommended in this report will help attract additional funding and support from Games partners, including the Organizing Committee for the TORONTO 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games ("TO2015").

 

The Host City Showcase Program will also have a significant positive impact on the overall quality and experience of the TORONTO 2015 Games for city residents and businesses; visitors and dignitaries; athletes, coaches and officials; and local and international media.

 

A related purpose of this report is to describe and propose the establishment of a new Major Special Event Reserve Fund which would be used, initially, to fund components of the Showcase Program. This Reserve Fund has the potential to be one of the most important institutional legacies of the Games, as it would position Toronto to more effectively pursue and deliver other high profile events by providing a funding source to cover (a share of the) non-recurring bidding, municipal service and enhanced City programming costs associated with such events.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report with Appendices A to F, from the City Manager on Toronto Pan/Parapan Am Games Host City Showcase Program and Major Special Event Reserve Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59687.pdf

Speakers

Eduardo Harari, Liberal Outreach
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Councillor Pam McConnell

Communications (Committee)

(June 27, 2013) Letter from Denise Pinto, Operations Director, Jane's Walk (EX.Supp.EX33.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38753.pdf
(June 28, 2013) E-mail from James Meers, Friends of the Pan Am Path (Letters of Support and Pam Am Path Legacy Proposal Deck) (EX.Supp.EX33.13.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38728.pdf
(July 1, 2013) E-mail from Liz Sutherland (EX.Supp.EX33.13.3)
(July 1, 2013) Letter from Patrick Connor, E.D. Ontario Trails (EX.Supp.EX33.13.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38781.pdf
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Ian Troop, CEO, Toronto 2015 PanAm/Parapan Am (EX.New.EX33.13.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38847.pdf
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Kathleen Birney and Pamela Allen (EX.New.EX33.13.6)

Communications (City Council)

(July 11, 2013) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.EX33.13.7)
(July 12, 2013) Letter from Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (CC.New.EX33.13.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39108.pdf

EX33.14 - West Channel 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games Venue Proposal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Council-approved 2013 Capital Budget for Pan Am Games to create a new capital project called West Channel in the amount of $2.42 million funded by redirecting $2.42 million in savings from the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre capital project.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report back to the November 25, 2013 Parks and Environment Committee on the increased activity and programming that can be accommodated as a result of the planned improvements to the West Channel.

Origin

(June 13, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report advises of a new 2015 Games venue request from the Toronto Organizing Committee for the 2015 Pan and Parapan American Games (“TO2015”) and seeks authority to pay for the venue from approved PF&R 2015 Games capital project funding.

 

In addition, this report provides an update on the status of the Parks, Forestry and Recreation (“PF&R”) 2015 Pan and Parapan American Games (“2015 Games”) capital projects.

 

Specifically, the City has received a request from TO2015 for the use of the waterways between Ontario Place and Marilyn Bell Park (the “West Channel”) (please refer to Appendix “A”) for the purposes of hosting Water Ski and Wakeboard, Open Water Swimming and the swim segment of the Triathlon during the 2015 Games.  Certain capital works must be completed for the waterways to meet international competition standards (the “West Channel Project”).

 

In 2011, City Council approved a capital project called Pan Am Aquatic Centre/Canadian Sport Institute for Ontario (the “PAAC”), which is now the Toronto Pan Am Sport Centre (TPASC”).  The approved TPASC project cost is $248.93 million, $54.765 million of which represents the City's contribution.  However, the guaranteed price of the TPASC contract, project managed by Infrastructure Ontario (“IO”), is $205 million.  Consequently, the City’s contribution has been reduced to $45.10 million, resulting in projected Budget Savings of $9.67 million (the “TPASC Budget Savings”).  The TPASC contract cost is guaranteed; if project exceeds $205 million, the City’s contribution will not increase.  Council’s authority is sought for the General Manager of PF&R to redirect $2.42 million of the projected TPASC Budget Savings to fund the new West Channel Project.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on West Channel 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games Venue Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59582.pdf
Appendix A - West Channel Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59583.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Judy Sutcliffe, Secretary, West End Beaches Stakeholders Association (WEBSA) (EX.Supp.EX33.14.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38735.pdf

EX33.15 - 2012 Ontario Summer Games Review and Legacy Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation (the "General Manager") to approve legacy initiative management procedures, grant criteria and eligibility, program guidelines, accountability, reporting procedures and guidelines relating to the Toronto Sports Council Emerging Athlete's Fund and the Playing for Keeps Give Sport a Try program.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into agreements with The Sport Alliance of Ontario, the Toronto Community Foundation and WeirFoulds LLP for the allocation of 2012 Ontario Summer Games legacy funds on terms and conditions and in a form satisfactory to the General Manager and the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council approve the legacy initiative recommendations outlined in the report (May 10, 2013) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, consisting of the Toronto Sports Council Emerging Athlete's Fund and the Playing for Keeps Give Sport a Try program.

 

4.         City Council authorize that the 2013 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget be amended by $73,620.00 to establish a provision of the 2012 Games surplus funds in the 2013 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget in order to disperse surplus funds of $73,620.00 to WeirFoulds LLP and Toronto Community Foundation (trustees) for the Toronto Sports Council Emerging Athlete's Fund and Playing for Keeps Give Sport a Try program.

Origin

(June 6, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The 2012 Ontario Summer Games (2012 Games) held from August 14-19, 2012 proved to be a great success.  The purpose of this report is to highlight the success of the 2012 Games, to provide an update on the legacy initiatives that have been developed as a result of the 2012 Games and to seek authority to enter into agreements relating to the allocation of the legacy funds.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee on 2012 Ontario Summer Games Review and Legacy Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59408.htm
(May 23, 2013) Letter from the Community Development and Recreation Committee on 2012 Ontario Summer Games Review and Legacy Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59324.pdf
(May 10, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on 2012 Ontario Summer Games Review and Legacy Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59325.pdf
(May 23, 2013) Presentation - 2012 Ontario Summer Games "Dreams Begin Here"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59346.pdf

EX33.16 - Establishment of a City of Toronto - Toronto School Boards Task Force

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention

Communication EX33.16.3 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(June 14, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report is an update on work towards the establishment of a City of Toronto – Toronto School Boards working group, as requested in Member Motion MM23.3. This report recommends establishment of a City of Toronto – Toronto School Boards Task Force composed of City of Toronto Councillors and Toronto-area School Boards Trustees.

 

The purpose of the Task Force will be to identify issues of concern to Toronto residents which could benefit from better coordination between the City and School Boards, and to provide recommendations to City Council and Toronto-area School Boards on how to achieve and maintain such coordination and cooperation.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 14, 2013) Report with Appendix A from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Establishment of a City of Toronto - Toronto School Boards Task Force
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59574.pdf
(June 4, 2013) Appendix B - Letter of support from the Chair of the Toronto District School Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59575.pdf

Speakers

Catherine Soplet, Member, Peel Poverty Action Group

Communications (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22 - St. Paul's (EX.Main.EX.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38499.pdf
(June 27, 2013) E-mail from Nathalie Dufour-Seguin, Chair, Conseil scolaire de district catholique Centre-Sud (CSDCCS) (EX.Supp.EX33.16.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38744.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 10, 2013) Submission from Catherine Soplet (CC.Supp.EX33.16.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39082.pdf

EX33.17 - Update and Next Steps of Proposed Redevelopment of Seaton House and Revitalization of George Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve in principle the redevelopment of Seaton House and authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in consultation with the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services, to undertake the necessary due diligence required to proceed with the recommended option outlined in the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, including:

 

a.         Develop detailed plans for new facilities to include an emergency shelter, a long-term care home and a service hub;

 

b.         Consider potential uses of any surplus land for affordable housing with support services and a private sector partnership to help offset overall development costs;

 

c.         Retain the professional services of a consulting team to continue with redevelopment plans, including but not limited to a heritage study, planning studies and approvals, site and building plans and approvals, detailed costing and the preparation of a procurement process;

 

d.         Ensure that existing shelter beds are replaced as most appropriate for shelter clients' needs and in the context of the Housing Stability Service Plan to be brought forward to Council in the fall of 2013; and

 

e.         Consult with the Province regarding the proposed uses and timing of the redevelopment of the provincial lands opposite the Seaton House property.

 

2.         The Offers to Sell to the City from the owners of the properties outlined in Confidential Attachment E to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, be accepted substantially on the terms and conditions as outlined therein, and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information and recommendations in Attachment E to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, upon the closing of all of the project transactions.

 

4.         City Council direct that the 2013 Approved Capital Budget (CHSO31) for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration be increased by the acquisition price of the properties as outlined in the Confidential Attachment E to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, funded from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF) (XR-1012).

 

5.         City Council authorize severally each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services to accept the Offers on behalf of the City.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions contemplated in the Offers to Sell on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.

 

7.         City Council authorize the Director of Real Estate Services to enter into negotiations with the owners of the remaining properties required to effect the development as proposed, and to report to Council at a later date if necessary.

 

8.         City Council direct the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services to meet with Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC) and Toronto Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) regarding an approval process that will enable the City of Toronto to incorporate the Seaton House project into its multi-year redevelopment plan and take advantage of partnership opportunities.

 

9.         City Council direct the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services to report to Community Development and Recreation Committee on how the Seaton House redevelopment can be integrated into the division's overall long-term care home capital redevelopment strategy and service plan.

 

10.       City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report back on the status of the redevelopment and related financing plans by the second quarter of 2015 and that final approval of a redevelopment proposal be subject to Council approval of an acceptable financing and budget plan.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

As previously reported to City Council, Seaton House, a 543-bed City-operated emergency shelter for men located at 339 George Street, is in critical need of redevelopment due to the building's aging condition and its challenges in providing appropriate emergency shelter programs.  Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) and Long-Term Care Homes and Services (LTCHS) are partnering to recommend an innovative project that responds to community need and addresses both the need to redevelop Seaton House and the need for a long-term care home in downtown Toronto.  The divisions are recommending the co-location of services in a new facility on George Street to more effectively address the needs of both short-term homeless men and an aging vulnerable population.

 

At its meeting of November 30, 2009 City Council gave the General Manager of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration the authority to negotiate a public interest partnership with Spike/KMAI to redevelop Seaton House along with adjacent properties to the south.  Those negotiations were not successful.  This report provides an update on activities since 2009.

 

Staff have consulted stakeholders representing a broad range of interests in relation to the proposed redevelopment.  Shelter, Support and Housing Administration retained a consultant to conduct a feasibility study of options for redevelopment.  Recommendations in this staff report take into account feedback received from stakeholder consultations as well as the consultant's findings and represent staff's advice on what will meet the needs of the homeless and vulnerable residents of Toronto served by Shelter, Support and Housing Administration within the George Street neighbourhood and Long-Term Care Homes and Services within the Toronto Central Local Heath Integration Network (LHIN) downtown area.

 

This report seeks Council authority to move forward with the redevelopment plans for Seaton House, including the purchase of private properties adjacent to the shelter, in partnership with Long-Term Care Homes and Services.

 

The recommended option, based on the consultant's report, includes approximately 100 emergency shelter beds, in line with best practices, as well as a long-term care home (estimate based on 162 beds) and 24,000 square feet of space for community services.  The consultant's study only investigated preliminary massing options.  The exact number of beds for both the emergency shelter and long-term care home as well as space for associated community services will be refined as more detailed plans are developed.  The preferred option would also include surplus land on the north end of the site which could be developed for affordable housing with support services for former shelter residents and/or include a private sector partnership to help offset overall development costs.

 

One of the redevelopment objectives is to find more appropriate permanent housing for Seaton House residents.  Men residing in the Long Term Program and Annex/Infirmary Program (approximately 250 residents) could be eligible for long-term care or assisted living homes, housing with supports or housing allowances.  The redeveloped shelter would accommodate approximately 100 men from the Emergency Shelter program, leaving approximately 140 residents that could be absorbed into transitional housing programs or the emergency shelter system.  SSHA will develop and implement a transition plan for all residents of Seaton House over the next four years.

 

In addition to providing more effective services to homeless people and vulnerable individuals, the proposed redevelopment can act as a catalyst for the Downtown East Revitalization Strategy, contributing to a safer and healthier neighbourhood.  The redevelopment is consistent with the goals and principles of Council's Housing Opportunities Toronto (HOT) ten year affordable housing strategy and the Toronto Seniors Strategy.

 

If Council adopts the recommendations put forward in this report, staff will report back on the status of the redevelopment by the second quarter of 2015 and prior to recommending any final decision. The earliest date to begin construction is estimated to be 2017.  In the interim, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration would continue with stakeholder consultations and retain a consulting team to continue with the redevelopment plans, planning approvals and detailed costing.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Update and Next Steps of Proposed Redevelopment of Seaton House and Revitalization of George Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59666.pdf
Appendix A - Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59701.pdf
Appendix B - Current Programs and Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59702.pdf
Appendix C - High-Level Client Profiles
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59703.pdf
Appendix D - Examples of Best Practices
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59705.pdf
Appendix E - Confidential Attachment

Background Information (City Council)

Confidential Attachment E - made public on April 29, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92742.pdf

Speakers

Tim Maguire, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 79 (Submission Filed)
Susan Gapka

Communications (Committee)

(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Beth Wilson, Senior Researcher, Social Planning Toronto (EX.New.EX33.17.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38871.pdf
(July 3, 2013) E-mail from Tim Maguire, President, Canadian Union of Public Employes (CUPE) Local 79 (EX.New.EX33.17.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38872.pdf

EX33.20 - Upgrading City Infrastructure During Construction Of The Metrolinx Rapid Transit Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, with respect to the Metrolinx procurement process to retain the alternative financing and procurement (AFP) Contractor:

 

a.         Authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to request Metrolinx to include new and upgraded City infrastructure as set out in Appendices A-1, A-2 and C to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B (the "Recommended Additional City Infrastructure") in its request for proposals (RFP) for the Transit Program, as provisional or optional items for which separate competitive pricing is to be provided and with which the City can determine if it wishes to proceed, all in accordance with the terms of the Master Agreement.

 

b.         Authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, following selection by Metrolinx of the alternative financing and procurement (AFP) Contractor, to identify and approve the Recommended Additional City Infrastructure which the AFP Contractor will be asked to construct, subject to the following conditions:

 

i.          The Deputy City Manager, Cluster B is of the view that the price submitted by the alternative financing and procurement (AFP) Contractor for the Recommended Additional City Infrastructure is considered fair and reasonable; and

 

ii.         The funding for the cost of the Recommended Additional City Infrastructure is available, in the year required, within an approved capital budget.

 

2.         City Council:

 

a.         Authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B subject to the conditions set out in Recommendation 2(b) to:

 

i.          Include part of the Basement Flooding Protection Program as set out in Appendix B to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and at other locations that he may later identify and which intersect with, or are situated in close proximity to the Transit Program, as additional scope in Metrolinx's existing contracts for tunnelling work (the "Tunnelling Contracts"); and

 

ii.         Identify and approve other enhancements or upgrades to City infrastructure impacted by the Transit Program, as well as investigative, planning and design studies considered necessary for City infrastructure and services in the vicinity of the Transit Program, which may arise from time to time (the "Unidentified Work") as additional scope in any agreement which Metrolinx may have for the Transit Program, including any agreement with the alternative financing and procurement (AFP) Contractor and the Tunnelling Contracts.

 

b.         Apply the following conditions to the authority provided to the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B by Recommendation 2(a):

 

i.          The Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, is of the view that the benefits and costs of the Unidentified Work in each case are fair and reasonable; and

 

ii.         The funding for the cost of the Unidentified Work is available, in the year required, within an approved capital or operating budget.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to enter into any agreements with Metrolinx, including any amendments and extensions, and any other agreements with any other parties as may be considered necessary, to give effect to Recommendations 1 and 2, all on such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council, in order to protect competitive bidding and procurement processes with respect to the infrastructure to which the Confidential Information in Attachment 1 to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B relates, only release the Confidential Information to the public after the City has entered into contracts or other agreements with Metrolinx or any other parties for construction of the new and upgraded infrastructure.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Summary

In 2012, Toronto City Council authorized the City to enter into a Master Agreement for the implementation of a Provincially-funded Toronto light rail transit program, which agreement the City signed with the TTC and Metrolinx (the "Master Agreement").

 

This report seeks authorities that will permit the City to coordinate its own infrastructure projects with the first phase of Metrolinx's Toronto light rail transit program (the "Transit Program") to avoid multiple construction disruptions in the same location and to capitalize on any cost savings that may be available.

 

Toronto Water and Transportation Services have identified a preliminary list of capital projects that Metrolinx could construct for the City in the course of construction of the Transit Program. The estimated cost of this list of capital projects is included in the confidential attachments to this Report (the “Confidential Information”). The City may identify other opportunities to coordinate City infrastructure projects with Metrolinx as the latter provides the City with more information pertaining to the scope and schedule of the Transit Program, including City infrastructure that will be impacted by transit construction.

 

Metrolinx is utilizing the services of several contractors, including one that will design, build, finance, and maintain the Transit Program in accordance with a concession agreement that follows the Provincial alternative financing and procurement ("AFP") model. A request for proposals ("RFP") will be issued by Metrolinx this Fall to select a contractor (the "AFP Contractor"). Accordingly, the City must move quickly to incorporate its requirements for additional infrastructure in the RFP.

 

This report also outlines the process that City divisions will subsequently follow through consideration of annual capital budgets, to seek funding for City infrastructure projects which the City wishes to have Metrolinx undertake as part of the coordination of capital projects.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, on Upgrading City Infrastructure During Construction Of The Metrolinx Rapid Transit Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59645.pdf
Appendix A-1 - Toronto Water - New/Upgraded Watermain Infrastructure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59844.pdf
Appendix A-2 - Toronto Water - New/Upgraded Sewer Infrastructure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59845.pdf
Appendix B - Toronto Water - Basement Flooding Project Infrastructure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59866.pdf
Appendix C - Transportation Services - New Transportation Infrastructure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59867.pdf
Attachment 1 - Confidential Information: Upgrading City Infrastructure During Construction Of The Metrolinx Rapid Transit Program

EX33.21 - Toronto Water 2013 Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the reallocation of funds in Toronto Water's approved 2013 Water Capital Budget in the amount of $1,200,000, as presented in Schedule A to the report (May 23, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero gross Budget impact.

 

2.         City Council authorize the deferral and acceleration of funds in Toronto Water's approved 2013 Capital Budget and 2014-2022 Capital Plan in the amount of $20,795,000 as presented in Schedule A to the report (May 23, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, with a zero gross impact.

Origin

(June 6, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This report requests City Council’s authority to amend Toronto Water's Approved 2013 Capital Budget and 2014-2022 Capital Plan by adjusting project cashflows contained within the Budget and Plan, respectively, to better meet program requirements.  The adjustment of  project cash flows will have a zero gross overall Capital Budget impact and will better align 2013 and future year cash flows with Toronto Water's capital project delivery schedule and program requirements.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee on Toronto Water 2013 Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations/Deferrals (Item BU41.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59407.htm
(May 23, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Toronto Water 2013 Capital Budget Adjustments and Accelerations / Deferrals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59322.pdf
Attachment Schedule A - Toronto Water 2013 Capital Budget Amendments, Deferrals/Accelerations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59323.pdf

EX33.22 - Proposed Energy and Water Efficiency Initiative for the Residential Sector

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1162 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact a by-law pursuant to Section 35 of Ontario Regulation 596/06 to authorize the undertaking of energy efficiency and water conservation works on private residential property as local improvements under the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program set out in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer to:

 

a.         implement the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program in accordance with the process and criteria set out in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, including the approval of participating properties, eligible retrofit measures, eligible expenses and pilot neighbourhood selection;

 

b.         negotiate and enter into all property owner agreements with consenting property owners on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix B to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor and sufficient for the City Clerk pursuant to Ontario Regulation 596/06; and

 

c.         report back to City Council upon the conclusion of the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program with an evaluation of outcomes and, if appropriate, a business case for a broader full-scale program.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to give the requisite notices, to assess the sufficiency of the property owner agreements, and to certify the property owner agreements, all in accordance with Ontario Regulation 596/06.

 

4.         City Council approve the imposition of a special local improvement charge on properties participating in the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program in the amount of the cost of the local improvement undertaken on the participating properties as set out in the property owner agreement for the participating property, and payable over the term set out in the property owner agreement for the participating property.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Treasurer to:

 

a.         prepare a local improvement roll, to certify the local improvement roll, and to certify that the full payment of the special charge has occurred when and if it does; and

 

b.         add the special charge imposed on participating properties for the cost of the work undertaken on that property to the tax roll for the property in the year in which it becomes payable.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to regularly submit bills to impose the special charge on participating properties.

 

7.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to:

 

a.         Establish a discretionary reserve fund called the 'Local Improvement Charge Energy Works Reserve Fund' to provide funds to consenting property owners for the purpose of undertaking qualifying retrofit projects on private property, including but not limited to, energy and water efficiency and conservation, under the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program as outlined in Appendix E to the report (June 18, 2013) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer;

 

b.         Amend Municipal Code, Chapter 227, Reserve and Reserve Funds, by adding ‘Local Improvement Charge Energy Works Reserve Fund’ to Schedule No. 7 - Corporate Discretionary Reserve Funds;

 

c.         Borrow up to $20 million from the Working Capital Reserve over the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program and transfer such funds to the Local Improvement Charge Energy Works Reserve Fund to fund the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program;

 

d.         Repay the Working Capital Reserve from the Local Improvement Charge Energy Works Reserve Fund as local improvement charges established under the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program are paid to the City by property owners participating in the Program; and

 

e.         Establish interest rates that reflect the City’s current return on its investment portfolio with terms to maturity of up to 15 years (single-family houses) and 20 years (multi-residential buildings) for the purpose of recovering the City's foregone investment income on the funds used by the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program.  As part of the overall cost of the Program, the interest rate will be applied to the cost of each retrofit project and used to determine the total local improvement charges imposed by the City on participating properties.

 

8.         City Council increase the 2013 Approved Operating Budget for Environment and Energy Division by $162,500.00 gross and $0 net to begin the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program in the fall of 2013.

 

9.         City Council authorize the City Manager to negotiate and enter into all necessary agreements with Toronto Hydro, Enbridge Gas Distribution, Natural Resources Canada and other partners, in forms satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to support joint implementation of the Residential Energy Retrofit Pilot Program, as required.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report seeks City Council approval to undertake a pilot program designed to advance funding to consenting property owners interested in undertaking qualifying energy and water improvements and willing to allow the City to impose a Local Improvement Charge (LIC) on their property to secure repayment.  The program responds to a City Council directive and is authorized by recent Provincial amendments to the City of Toronto Act's LIC regulation (Ontario Regulation 596/06).

 

Eligible LIC projects include cost-effective natural gas, electricity and water efficiency and conservation measures.  The funds advanced to consenting property owners would be repaid to the City over a period of 5 to 15 years (single-family houses) and 5 to 20 years (multi-unit residential buildings) via a special charge that is added to the property tax bill of the benefitting property.  The repayment term would be geared to generally reflect the anticipated operating cost reductions (i.e. energy or water savings) and useful life of the retrofit measure(s).

 

This voluntary program will include two streams, single-family homes and multi-unit residential buildings, and targets the participation of up to 1,000 houses and 10 multi-unit residential buildings completing energy assessments, installing energy efficiency and water conservation measures and accessing the LIC, with a total funding envelope of $20 million.  The program is projected to stimulate job creation, increase housing affordability through operating cost savings and annually avoid 5,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions.

 

The primary focus of the pilot program is to test the market receptivity to this new financing mechanism, its ability to accelerate the uptake for investment in energy efficiency and evaluate how it aligns with the City’s economic development, housing quality and affordability and environmental sustainability objectives.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report with Appendices A to E, from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Proposed Energy and Water Efficiency Initiative for the Residential Sector
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59644.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 26, 2013) E-mail from Ann Hannah, President, Toronto Real Estate Board (EX.Supp.EX33.22.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38748.pdf
(June 27, 2013) E-mail from Timothy M. Egan, President and Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Gas Association (EX.Supp.EX33.22.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38749.pdf
(June 28, 2013) E-mail from Vladan Veljovic, President and CEO, Green Saver (EX.Supp.EX33.22.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38758.pdf
(June 28, 2013) E-mail from Mitzie Hunter, Chief Executive Officer, CivicAction (EX.Supp.EX33.22.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38759.pdf
(June 28, 2013) E-mail from Greg Labbe, Partner, BlueGreen Consulting Group Inc. (EX.Supp.EX33.22.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38760.pdf
(June 28, 2013) E-mail from Mara Samardzic, Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) (EX.Supp.EX33.22.6)
(June 29, 2013) E-mail from Ed Homonylo, President, Mammoth Building Inspection Services Inc. (EX.Supp.EX33.22.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38835.pdf
(June 30, 2013) E-mail from Gabriella Kalapos, Acting Executive Director, Clean Air Partnership, Co-Chair of the Clean Air Council (EX.Supp.EX33.22.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38836.pdf
(July 1, 2013) E-mail from Julia Langer (EX.Supp.EX33.22.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38839.pdf
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Jamie Paris, Manager, Residential Energy Solutions, Enbridge (EX.Supp.EX33.22.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38840.pdf
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Daryl Chong, President and CEO, Greater Toronto Apartment Association (EX.Supp.EX33.22.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38732.pdf
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Karen Nasmith, Director, Co-Founder, Project Neutral, Centre for Social Innovation (EX.Supp.EX33.22.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38843.pdf
(July 2, 2013) Letter from Gail Lawlor, Steering Committee Member, Building Performance Institute Canada (EX.Supp.EX33.22.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38733.pdf
(July 2, 2013) Letter from Qumers Wejdan, Legal Counsel, Canadian Bankers Association (EX.New.EX33.22.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38890.pdf
(June 27, 2013) Letter from Chris Tyrell, Vice President Customer Care and Chief Conservation Officer, Toronto Hydro (EX.New.EX33.22.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38891.pdf
(July 2, 2013) Letter from Rita Bijons, Co-Chair, Green 13 (EX.New.EX33.22.16)
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Jode Roberts (EX.New.EX33.22.17)
(June 26, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19 - Trinity-Spadina (EX.New.EX33.22.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38894.pdf
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Mark Salerno, Manager (EX.New.EX33.22.19)
(July 2, 2013) Letter from Brian Denney, P. Eng, Chief Executive Officer, Toronto and Region Conservation (TRCA) (EX.New.EX33.22.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38896.pdf
(July 3, 2013) E-mail from Charley Beresford (EX.New.EX33.22.21)

EX33.23 - Funding Servicing Priorities for East Bayfront Revitalization

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX33.23a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize that Toronto Water's approved 2013 Capital Budget and 2014-2022 Capital Plan be amended to provide funding for sanitary servicing and Stormwater  infrastructure, necessary for servicing waterfront lands associated with the development of the East Bayfront Precinct, by adding the following capital projects:

 

a.         Waterfront Stormwater Infrastructure Project at an estimated cost of $17.50 million, funded from the Stormwater Management Development Charge Reserve Fund (XR2113) in the amount of $5.40 million and the Wastewater Capital Reserve Fund (XR6004) in the amount of $12.10 million, with 2013 to 2015 cash flows as outlined in Table 1 of the report (May 29, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water; and

 

b.         Waterfront Sanitary Servicing Infrastructure Project at an estimated cost of $17.80 million funded from the Sanitary Sewer Development Charge Reserve Fund (XR2026) in the amount of $11.64 million and the Wastewater Capital Reserve Fund (XR6004) in the amount of $6.16 million, with 2013 to 2014 cash flows as outlined in Table 1 of the report (May 29, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water.

 

2.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, in consultation with the Acting Director, Waterfront Secretariat, to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City a project delivery agreement pursuant to which Waterfront Toronto will as delivery agent for the City provide engineering, procurement and construction management services and under which Waterfront Toronto will contribute $11.6 million and the City will pay the balance of the estimated construction costs up to a maximum estimated amount of $35.3 million for the construction of the Waterfront Stormwater Infrastructure Project and the Waterfront Sanitary Servicing Infrastructure Project on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Toronto Water and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the Acting Director, Waterfront Secretariat, to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City a contribution agreement with Waterfront Toronto as project lead for waterfront revitalization, whereby the City agrees to construct the Waterfront Stormwater Infrastructure Project and the Waterfront Sanitary Servicing Infrastructure Project in exchange for Waterfront Toronto agreeing to pay the City the portion of the construction costs net of Waterfront Toronto's initial $11.6 million contribution and amounts not recovered through development charges estimated to be $18.26 million over ten years; on terms and conditions which are satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council direct that contributions received from Waterfront Toronto pursuant the foregoing contribution agreement are to be credited to the Wastewater Capital Reserve Fund (XR6004).

 

5.         City Council consent to Waterfront Toronto acting as the City’s agent to sign any infrastructure and servicing permits, licenses, applications and agreements required for the design, engineering and construction of the facilities funded by the report (May 29, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water, and any other facilities to be funded by the City, provided that Waterfront Toronto agrees to assume all obligations including costs and liabilities under such documentation and subject to such other terms required by the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

6.         City Council consent to City staff pursuing with Waterfront Toronto additional avenues to recover from benefitting landowners a portion of the developer portion of the cost borne by Waterfront Toronto of the sanitary servicing and stormwater infrastructure, necessary for servicing.

 

7.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, in consultation with the Acting Director, Waterfront Secretariat, to negotiate and execute on behalf of the City from time to time as necessary, project delivery agreements pursuant to which Waterfront Toronto will as delivery agent for the City provide engineering, procurement and construction management services paid for by the City for the construction of stormwater and sanitary servicing infrastructure required in connection with the revitalization of the waterfront by Waterfront Toronto.

 

8.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water to amend Purchase Order No. 6026913 with Associated Engineering (ON) Ltd. for engineering services related to the construction phase of the Scott Street Sewage Pumping Station Rehabilitation by an additional amount of $672,230.00 net of all taxes ($684,061.25 net of HST recoveries) revising the current contract value from $330,065.00 to $1,002,295.00 net of all taxes ($1,019,935.40 net of HST recoveries).

 

9.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water, to execute and deliver all agreements, consents, authorizations, authorized by the foregoing recommendations on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee requested that the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water meet with Waterfront Toronto to identify possible short term project deferrals in order to fund the $18.26M in project financing and report directly to the July 16, 2013 City Council meeting.

Origin

(June 6, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The revitalization of the East Bayfront Precinct is underway and the servicing of development within the Precinct requires new stormwater management facilities in accordance with the City's Wet Weather Flow Master Plan, and upgrades to the existing sanitary sewer system. In particular, the approval of the Bayside Subdivision contained within the East Bayfront Precinct requires servicing, which is ultimately the responsibility of Waterfront Toronto under the subdivision agreement.

 

Waterfront Toronto receives and manages direct government funding through a Long Term Funding Plan approved annually by all three orders of government. Waterfront Toronto does not have sufficient funding for the preferred servicing strategy for this development. This report recommends an arrangement whereby the City will pay for constructing the servicing needs required for this development and other Waterfront Toronto and private development needs across the East Bayfront and North Keating Precincts and Waterfront Toronto will contribute over time, in its role as project lead for waterfront revitalization, a portion of those costs.

 

This recommended funding and servicing plan have several advantages in that it:

 

a.         provides the necessary sanitary servicing to permit the development of all lands across the two precincts;

b.         reduces overall servicing costs as it eliminates the need for the interim sanitary servicing solution for the Bayside Phase I development; and

c.         provides for a more cost-effective and timely construction of a stormwater treatment facility to service the East Bayfront Precinct and ultimately the future North Keating Precinct.

 

The total infrastructure cost for this servicing has been estimated at $46.9 million. Waterfront Toronto, through the government funded Long Term Funding Plan, only has $11.6 million in currently available funding.

 

This report proposes that the required  $46.9 million will be funded by Waterfront Toronto ($11.6 million) and the balance by the City from Toronto Water's Stormwater Management and Sanitary Sewer Development Charges Reserve Funds ($17.04 million) for a portion of the growth related share and Toronto Water's Capital Reserve Funds ($18.26 million) for the remainder.

 

City will enter into a project delivery agreement pursuant to which Waterfront Toronto will contribute $ 11.6 million and the City will pay the balance of the estimated construction costs up to a maximum estimated amount of $35.3 million for the construction of the Waterfront Stormwater Infrastructure Project and the Waterfront Sanitary Servicing Infrastructure Project.

 

A contribution agreement will be entered into with Waterfront Toronto to pay the construction costs initially funded by Toronto Water's Capital Financing Reserve estimated to be $18.26 million in exchange for the City constructing these works.  Waterfront Toronto anticipates that the payment would occur when certain properties from the second phase of the Bayside subdivision are developed, in approximately ten years.  Waterfront Toronto may also negotiate contributions by the benefitting property owners for their fair share of this cost.  The benefitting lands for the new Stormwater infrastructure are shown in Appendix B.  The benefitting lands for the new sanitary facilities are shown on Appendix C.

 

The $17.04 million advanced from the Development Charges Reserve will be recovered as development charges.

 

Further, the sanitary servicing of the East Bayfront Precinct, west of Sherbourne Street, requires an upgrade to the City's Scott Street Sanitary Pumping Station and therefore authority is being requested to amend Purchase Order 6026913 issued to Associated Engineering Ltd., for engineering services for the construction administration phase related to the upgrading of the Scott Street Sewage Pumping Station. This related work will increase the pumping station’s efficiency and capacity to service its surrounding catchment area including portions of the waterfront.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee on Funding Servicing Priorities for East Bayfront Revitalization (Item BU41.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59320.htm
(May 29, 2013) Report with Appendices A to D, from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water on Funding Servicing Priorities for East Bayfront Revitalization
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59321.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 16, 2013) Supplementary report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water on the Funding Servicing Priorities for East Bayfront Revitalization (EX33.23a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60279.pdf
Appendix A - Capital Expenditure and Sources of City Funding
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60304.pdf

EX33.24 - 2013 Heads and Beds Levy on Institutions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1104 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the levy and collection of amounts for the 2013 taxation year on hospitals, colleges and universities and correctional facilities as authorized by Section 285 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

2.         City Council direct that the maximum prescribed amount of $75 be applied per provincially rated hospital bed, full time student, or resident place as prescribed by Ontario Regulation 121/07.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Treasurer to report directly to Council at its scheduled meeting of July 16-17, 2013 on the final 2013 “Heads and Beds” levy should the final 2013 capacity figures for Colleges be received from the Province prior to this Council meeting.

 

4.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to enact regulations to prescribe a rate of not less than $135.29 for each full time student, provincially-rated bed or resident place for the 2013 taxation year, reflecting inflationary increases since 1987 when the current $75 rate was enacted.

 

5.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to adjust the heads and beds rate annually in each future year to reflect an average annual inflationary increase.

 

6.         City Council, should the province enact a new rate applicable for 2013, authorize staff to bring an amending bylaw to Council to enact the new rates.

 

7.         City Council grant authority for the introduction of the necessary bill in Council to levy amounts for the 2013 taxation year on hospitals, colleges and universities and correctional facilities.

 

Origin

(June 14, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report requests authority to adopt a by-law to levy amounts for the 2013 taxation year for public hospitals, universities and colleges, and correctional facilities (the “institutions”), estimated at approximately $16 million (annual “Heads and Beds” levy).

Background Information (Committee)

(June 14, 2013) Report with Attachment 1 from the Treasurer on 2013 Heads and Beds Levy on Institutions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59669.pdf

EX33.25 - 2013 Levy on Railway Roadways and Rights of Way and on Power Utility Transmission and Distribution Corridors

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1105 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the levy and collection of taxes for the 2013 taxation year on railway roadways and rights of way and on land used as transmission or distribution corridors owned by power utilities, in accordance with subsection 280 (1) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and subsection 257.7 (1) the Education Act.

 

2.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to enact regulations to prescribe a levy on Railway Roadway and Rights of Way for the 2013 taxation year, reflecting inflationary increases since 1987 when the current rate was enacted.

 

3.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to adjust the rate annually in each future year to reflect an average annual inflationary increase.

 

4.         City Council, should the province enact a new rate applicable for 2013, authorize staff to bring an amending bylaw to Council to enact the new rates. 

 

5.         City Council grant authority for the introduction of the necessary bill to give effect thereto.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report seeks Council authority for the introduction of the by-law necessary to levy and collect taxes for the 2013 taxation year on railway roadways and rights of way and on land used as transmission or distribution corridors owned by power utilities, totalling approximately $7.3 million in taxation revenue, of which the municipal share is $6.6 million and the provincial education share is $0.7 million. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Treasurer on 2013 Levy on Railway Roadways and Rights of Way and on Power Utility Transmission and Distribution Corridors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59671.pdf

EX33.26 - City of Toronto 2012 Investment Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (June18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer for information.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report provides a review of the annual returns realized in 2012 on the funds invested in the City's internally-managed investment portfolios. These portfolios hold the City's working capital and the amounts designated for the City's reserves and reserve funds.  The investment results for other funds, such as sinking funds, pension funds and trust funds are reported on separately.

 

In compliance with Ontario Regulation 610/06 Financial Activities of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, a record of each transaction in the City's own securities is listed in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report with Appendix A, from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on City of Toronto 2012 Investment Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59840.pdf

EX33.27 - Funding for Scarborough Civic Centre Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the Facilities Management 2013 Approved Capital Budget by $0.709 million, with funding provided by Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (XR1012) in the amount of $0.7 million and Section 37 funds in the amount of $0.009 million, to replenish the capital budget for Albert Campbell Park to a total project cost of $1.909 million.

 

2.         City Council authorize the creation of one sub-project and increase funding in the Facilities Management 2013 Approved Capital Budget in the amount of $0.15 million, with funding provided by the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (XR1012), for retrofitting the Scarborough Civic Centre to be a Bird Friendly Building.

 

3.         City Council authorize the creation of one sub-project and increase funding in the Parks, Forestry and Recreation 2013 Approved Capital Budget in the amount of $0.1 million, with funding provided by the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (XR1012), for construction of a dog park at the Hand of God Park.

 

4.         City Council approve the plan to implement the Albert Campbell Park, Bird Friendly Building and Dog Park projects separately.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

To allocate funds from Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF) for previously approved projects in the Scarborough Civic Centre Complex in order to undertake previously identified and new projects that will enhance services to the public. These adjustments will maximize the use of dedicated LARF and Section 37 funds with zero impact on City debt funding levels.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Funding for Scarborough Civic Centre Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59643.pdf

EX33.29 - Revised Budget Process for 2014

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the meeting dates as presented in Appendix 1 to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer for the 2014 Operating and Capital Budget Schedule, with the following changes to existing scheduled Committee dates:

 

a.         The Economic Development Committee be scheduled to meet on November 22, 2013 replacing the current scheduled meeting of December 2, 2013;

 

b.         The Community Development and Recreation Committee be scheduled to meet on December 4, 2013 replacing the current scheduled meeting of December 3, 2013;

 

c.         The Parks and Environment Committee be scheduled to meet on December 6, 2013 replacing the current scheduled meeting of November 25, 2013; and

 

d.         The Licensing and Standards Committee be scheduled to meet on December 9, 2013 replacing the current scheduled meeting of December 4, 2013.

 

2.         City Council approve the review of divisional service levels and activities for City Programs at appropriate Standing Committees in September 2013, and that:

 

            a.         the review of divisional service levels and activities along with any Standing Committee recommendations be referred to the 2014 Budget process for consideration and to staff to guide staff during the 2014 administrative budget review process.

 

3.         City Council approve as part of the budget process drop in sessions, following budget launch and open to all Councillors providing an opportunity for Councillors to ask questions of staff from each Program/Agency relative to the Councillors' specific interests.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report responds to City Council's direction to report on recommendations to make the City of Toronto budget process more transparent for Councillors and the public and to consider the proposed 2014 Budget timelines.  The report also responds to City Council's direction to report recommendations for a revised budget process for 2014 and future years.

 

Recommended revisions to the 2014 Budget process included in this report are based on the feedback provided to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Corporate Officer following a series of meetings that were open to all Councillors, with half of Council participating.  Recommended revisions will provide information and opportunities to ensure greater transparency in the budget process; improve the process for briefing all Councillors and reviewing divisional budgets and corporate accounts; permitting more time between Committee meetings and allowing for an earlier distribution of agendas; and allowing for Standing Committee review of divisional service levels and standards prior to consideration of the annual Capital and Operating Budgets.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report with Appendix 1, from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Revised Budget Process for 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59841.pdf
Appendix 2 - Revised Meeting Schedule for November 2013 - January 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59842.pdf

EX33.30 - Request for a Capital Loan Guarantee by Theatre Centre at 1115 Queen Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council:

 

a.         Approve the provision of a capital loan guarantee on behalf of the Theatre Centre to their lender (the “Lender”) in an amount not to exceed $1.0 million, inclusive of all interest costs payable by the Theatre Centre, for a period ending on December 31, 2017 (the “Guarantee”) to secure $1.0 million of a $1.5 million loan to be provided by the Lender to Theatre Centre for the Project (the “Loan”); and

 

b.         Authorize City staff to enter into an agreement with the Theatre Centre, and a tri-party agreement with the Theatre Centre and with the Lender, with respect to the Guarantee, to secure the terms and conditions set out in Recommendation 2 of the report (June 18, 2013) from the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

2.         City Council authorize the guarantee and all related agreements to be on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, including but not limited to the following terms:

 

a.         Prior to the issuance of the Guarantee, the Theatre Centre be required to submit a satisfactory quantity surveyor's report providing evidence that total cost of the Project will not exceed $6.225 million;

 

b.         The secured portion of the Loan be required to be retired on a pro-rata basis with the $500,000 unsecured portion of the loan also to be taken out by the Theatre Centre for the Project;

 

c.         Theatre Centre be required to repay and retire both the secured and unsecured portions of the Loan in accordance with the following schedule:

 

Date    Maximum Amount Outstanding

December 31, 2013     1,405,000

December 31, 2014     1,134,500

December 31, 2015     784,500

December 31, 2016     404,500

December 31, 2017     0

 

d.         In the event that the Lender calls on the City to make payment under the Guarantee, the City be authorized to recover the amount of the grant ordinarily made by the Toronto Arts Council to the Theatre Centre, either by reducing funding to the Toronto Arts Council or recovering the amount that would be allocated to the Theatre Centre, until such time as any funds the City had to pay on the Guarantee have been satisfied; and

 

e.         The Theatre Centre be required to annually submit its annual audited financial statements and capital and operating budgets to the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture.

 

3.         City Council deem the guarantee to be in the interest of the municipality.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

In April, 2010, City Council authorized a Below Market Rent lease agreement with the Theatre Centre at 1115 Queen Street West for the purpose of adaptively reusing the heritage designated Carnegie Library as a performing arts hub and community meeting space.  Theatre Centre, a not for profit organization, has partnered with other levels of government and the private sector to undertake the extensive renovations required of this City-owned facility, with a capital investment in this project estimated at $6.225 million (the "Project"). 

 

Theatre Centre has secured funding for over 70% of the Project cost ($4.5 million), leaving $1.725 million to be funded by Theatre Centre itself.  It proposes to do so by way of a capital fundraising campaign, which is underway but not yet completed.  To date, Theatre Centre has raised $1.02 million in pledges and cash, and the campaign is forecast to reach its full fundraising goal within the next 4 years.

 

Theatre Centre needs to bridge finance the shortfall.  Because Theatre Centre has no tangible assets (the property is owned by the City), their lender will require a loan guarantee.  Theatre Centre's lender is prepared to advance a $1.5 million loan, of which $1 million would be secured by the City and $0.5 million would be unsecured.

 

This report seeks Council approval of a capital loan guarantee to be issued by the City in favour of Theatre Centre in the amount of $1.0 million for a four year period ending in December 2017, subject to the terms and conditions described herein.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer Request for a Capital Loan Guarantee by Theatre Centre at 1115 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59665.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 28, 2013) E-mail from Peter Clarke (EX.Supp.EX33.30.1)

EX33.31 - Development Charges - Financial Impact of 2011 Amendment to Provide Reductions for Conversion of Industrial Lands

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (June 13, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer for information.

Origin

(June 13, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report responds to a request by Council for a report on the financial impact of a Development Charge By-law amendment relating to the conversion of certain types of non-residential floor space, primarily industrial, to other non-residential uses.

 

Under the City's Development Charge By-law (275-2009) certain non-residential uses, such as industrial, hospitals, colleges/universities, public schools and places of worship, are exempt from development charges. Prior to the amendment (By-law 1228-2011), redevelopment of such uses, even through interior alterations, to other non-residential uses was subject to the payment of development charges. The amendment provided a development charge reduction for redevelopment through interior alterations of such uses to other non-residential uses, and therefore represented a reduction in development charge revenues for the City. Based on data for 2012, while aggregate development charge revenues were almost $150 million (non-residential share $13.2 million), the revenue foregone as a result of the amendment amounted to approximately $1.71 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Development Charges - Financial Impact of 2011 Amendment to Provide Reductions for Conversion of Industrial Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59615.pdf

EX33.32 - Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2012

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the item for information.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto Operating Variance for the year ended December 31, 2012 and allocation of the 2012 year-end under-spending.  

 

The preliminary 2012 year-end operating position for Tax Supported Operations resulted in a net favourable variance of $248.183 million available for distribution after Council/Legislative Requirements are met.  Consistent with the City Council's approved Surplus Management Policy, at least 75 percent of the surplus or $186.116 million of the 2012 final year-end operating results will be allocated to the Capital Financing Reserve and $62.067 million will be allocated to underfunded liabilities and/or reserve funds.  In addition, Rate Supported Programs reported a year-end net favourable variance of $63.186 million.

 

It should be noted that the audit of the 2012 financial statements is not complete.  As a result, there is a possibility that changes to the final surplus amount could occur but staff anticipate that any further adjustments will be minor in nature.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59479.htm
(May 23, 2013) Report with Appendices A to D, from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59478.pdf
(June 28, 2013) 2013 Budget Briefing Note on Update on 2012 Actual Staffing Strength and 2013 Year-End Staffing and Vacancy Projections
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59994.pdf
Appendix 1- Briefing Note on 2012 Actual Staffing and 2013 Year-End Vacancy Projection Total Operating and Capital Positions - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59995.pdf

32a - Priority Consideration of the Unspent Portion of Shelter, Support and Housing’s Operating Variance for the Year ended December 31, 2012

Origin
(June 20, 2013) Report from City Council
Summary

City Council on June 11, 12 and 13, 2013, adopted Item CC36.5, as amended and in so doing, has requested the Executive Committee, when dealing with the Operating Variance Report for the year ended December 31, 2012, to consider as a priority, that the unspent portion of Shelter, Support and Housing be retained by the Division and be split between the social housing reserve fund to create new affordable housing units and the supplement programs to help keep vulnerable tenants in Toronto Community Housing Corporation units properly housed.

 

City Council on June 11, 12 and 13, 2013, adopted, as amended Item CC36.5, headed, “Housing at Risk: An Investigation into the Toronto Community Housing Corporation's Eviction of Seniors on the Basis of Rental Arrears”. 

 

City Council’s request is forwarded to the Executive Committee for consideration with the Operating Variance Report for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 20, 2013) Report from City Council on Priority Consideration of the Unspent Portion of Shelter, Support and Housing’s Operating Variance for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59897.pdf

EX33.33 - Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2012

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve additional carry forward funding of $0.767 million in unspent capital funding from 2012 and additional carry forward funding of $3.900 million in unspent capital funding from 2011 and prior years as detailed in Appendix 2 to the report (May 23, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in order to continue work on previously approved capital projects, and that the 2013 Approved Capital Budget be adjusted accordingly with no incremental impact on debt.

 

2.         City Council receive for information Appendix 3 to the report (May 23, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, which lists capital projects/sub-projects that have been completed and are to be closed.

 

3.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(June 6, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the 2012 Capital Variance Report for the year-ended December 31, 2012 and to seek Council’s approval for 2012 and prior year carry forward funding with no incremental impact on debt.

 

Capital expenditures for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 totalled $2.400 billion or 62.5% of the 2012 Approved Capital Budget of $3.838 billion (see Chart 1).  This spending pattern is consistent with prior years.  As detailed by City Program and Agency in Appendix 1, it is noted that 15 of 35 City Programs and Agencies spent in excess of 60% of their respective 2012 Approved Capital Budget.

 

(See Summary Section of the report dated May 23, 2013,

from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer for

 Chart 1 entitled "2012 Capital Budget Vs. Actual Expenditure for

 the Period Ended December 31, 2012")

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee on Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59406.htm
(May 23, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59314.pdf
Appendix 1 - 2012 Consolidated Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59317.pdf
Appendix 2 - 2012 and 2011 and Prior Years Carry Forwards Funding Adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59318.pdf
Appendix 3 - Closed Capital Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59315.pdf
Appendix 4 - Capital Variance Explanation - Programs/Agencies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59319.pdf

EX33.34 - Payment of Pre-development Expenses - Block 31 Railway Lands

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize funding of $1,405,705 from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR 1058) to reimburse Toronto Community Housing for costs incurred by it while acting as the City's agent in the pre-development of Block 31 in the Railway Lands.

Origin

(June 7, 2013) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office

Summary

City Council, at its meeting of November 27, 2012, directed the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to report to the Affordable Housing Committee to seek authority to reimburse Toronto Community Housing (TCH) for up to $1.5 million for pre-development costs incurred while acting in the capacity of the City's agent on Block 31 in the Railway Lands, and to identify a funding source.

 

This report provides information on the pre-development work undertaken by Toronto Community Housing (TCH) on Block 31 and recommends reimbursement in the amount of $1,405,705 from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR 1058).

Background Information (Committee)

(June 7, 2013) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, on Payment of Pre-development Expenses - Block 31 Railway Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59496.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 25, 2013) Letter from Eugene Jones Jr., President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation (EX.New.X33.34.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38998.pdf

34a - Payment of Pre-development Expenses - Block 31 Railway Lands

Origin
(June 24, 2013) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee
Summary

City Council, at its meeting of November 27, 2012, directed the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to report to the Affordable Housing Committee to seek authority to reimburse Toronto Community Housing (TCH) for up to $1.5 million for pre-development costs incurred while acting in the capacity of the City's agent on Block 31 in the Railway Lands, and to identify a funding source.

 

This report provides information on the pre-development work undertaken by TCH on Block 31 and recommends reimbursement in the amount of $1,405,705 from the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR 1058).

Background Information (Committee)
(June 24, 2013) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on Payment of Pre-development Expenses - Block 31 Railway Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59871.htm
(June 7, 2013) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, on Payment of Pre-development Expenses - Block 31 Railway Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59960.pdf

EX33.35 - Inventory of New Affordable Housing Opportunities 2015 - 2019

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, recognizing the importance of federal/provincial investments in "unlocking" new affordable rental and ownership housing opportunities, request the provincial government to expedite negotiations for a new funding agreement with the federal government under the Investment in Affordable Housing Program and that Toronto be given its fair share of funding.

 

2.         City Council direct that the Director, Affordable Housing Office, continue pursuing innovative partnerships with Toronto Community Housing, Build Toronto, Waterfront Toronto and non-profit and private sector affordable housing organizations to assist in achieving the City's affordable housing targets.

Origin

(June 7, 2013) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office

Summary

This report responds to a request from the Affordable Housing Committee at its January 29, 2013 meeting for information on opportunities to create affordable rental and ownership housing over the next five years.

 

A review has determined that there is a current inventory of proposals to develop 9,198 affordable homes, including 6,024 rental and 3,174 ownership homes.

 

The review of potential new affordable rental and ownership developments was undertaken within the context of the goal to create 1,000 new rental and 200 new ownership affordable homes annually as set out in the City's Housing Opportunities Toronto: An Affordable Housing Action Plan 2010-2020.

 

In recognition of the Housing Opportunities Toronto priority to support program-ready affordable housing on publicly-owned sites, staff consulted with Toronto Community Housing, Build Toronto, Waterfront Toronto and Shelter, Support and Housing Administration in the preparation of this report.

 

In addition, staff reviewed the development status of proposals which had been submitted by private and non-profit sectors for federal/provincial economic stimulus funding in 2009 but as yet had not started construction.

 

The review also covered the results of a recent Request for Proposals for affordable home ownership funding under the City's Home Ownership Assistance Program (HOAP). 

 

While the review did not canvas private sector or non-profit providers for new proposals, it nonetheless found that there is significant, ready-to-go capacity to develop new affordable rental and ownership homes. 

 

Recognizing the importance of federal/provincial investments in "unlocking" new affordable rental and ownership housing opportunities, the report recommends that Council request the provincial government to expedite negotiations for a new funding agreement with the federal government under the recently renewed Investment in Affordable Housing Program.

 

This report also requests the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to continue pursuing innovative partnerships with Toronto Community Housing, Build Toronto, Waterfront Toronto and non-profit and private sector affordable housing organizations to assist in achieving the City's affordable housing targets.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 7, 2013) Report with Appendices A to C from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, on Inventory of New Affordable Housing Opportunities 2015 - 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59526.pdf
Appendices A to C
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59798.pdf

35a - Inventory of New Affordable Housing Opportunities 2015 - 2019

Origin
(June 24, 2013) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee
Summary

This report responds to a request from the Affordable Housing Committee at its January 29, 2013 meeting for information on opportunities to create affordable rental and ownership housing over the next five years.

 

A review has determined that there is a current inventory of proposals to develop 9,198 affordable homes, including 6,024 rental and 3,174 ownership homes.

 

The review of potential new affordable rental and ownership developments was undertaken within the context of the goal to create 1,000 new rental and 200 new ownership affordable homes annually as set out in the City's Housing Opportunities Toronto: An Affordable Housing Action Plan 2010-2020.

 

In recognition of the Housing Opportunities Toronto priority to support program-ready affordable housing on publicly-owned sites, staff consulted with Toronto Community Housing, Build Toronto, Waterfront Toronto and Shelter, Support and Housing Administration in the preparation of this report.

 

In addition, staff reviewed the development status of proposals which had been submitted by private and non-profit sectors for federal/provincial economic stimulus funding in 2009 but as yet had not started construction.

 

The review also covered the results of a recent Request for Proposals for affordable home ownership funding under the City's Home Ownership Assistance Program (HOAP). 

 

While the review did not canvas private sector or non-profit providers for new proposals, it nonetheless found that there is significant, ready-to-go capacity to develop new affordable rental and ownership homes. 

 

Recognizing the importance of federal/provincial investments in "unlocking" new affordable rental and ownership housing opportunities, the report recommends that Council request the provincial government to expedite negotiations for a new funding agreement with the federal government under the recently renewed Investment in Affordable Housing Program.

 

This report also requests the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to continue pursuing innovative partnerships with Toronto Community Housing, Build Toronto, Waterfront Toronto and non-profit and private sector affordable housing organizations to assist in achieving the City's affordable housing targets.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 24, 2013) Letter from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, on Inventory of New Affordable Housing Opportunities 2015 - 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59965.htm
(June 7, 2013) Revised Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, on Inventory of New Affordable Housing Opportunities 2015 - 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59961.pdf
(June 7, 2013) Revised Appendix A - Affordable Housing Rental and Ownership Opportunities on City-Owned Sites; Appendix B - Affordable Rental Housing Opportunities from the Economic Stimulus Program; and Appendix C - Affordable Ownership Housing Opportunities from the Home Ownership Assistance Stimulus Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59962.pdf

EX33.36 - Assisting New Home Owners - Affordable Home Ownership Assistance Program Allocations 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
4 - Etobicoke Centre, 11 - York South-Weston, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 35 - Scarborough Southwest, 36 - Scarborough Southwest, 37 - Scarborough Centre, 38 - Scarborough Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.             City Council approve $4,575,000 in financial assistance under the City's Home Ownership Assistance Program, in the form of grants by way of forgivable loans from the Development Charges Reserve Fund (2009) for Subsidized Housing (XR2116) for the following not-for-profit affordable home ownership housing initiatives selected through Request for Proposal No. 9155-13-7046 up to the following amounts:

 

a.   Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc.

697 Danforth Rd.

$60,000.00

b.   Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc.

357 Birchmount Rd.

$135,000.00

c.   Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc.

30-52 Acme Cres.

$180,000.00

d.   Habitat for Humanity Toronto Inc.

Brimley Road between Lawrence Ave. E. & Britwell Ave.

$225,000.00

e.   Ownership Alternatives Non-Profit Corporation (Greater Toronto Area)

10 Wilby Cres.

$1,140,000.00

f.    Home Ownership Alternatives Non-Profit Corporation (Greater Toronto Area)

1340-1360 Danforth Rd.

$2,565,000.00

g.   Artscape Inc.

210 Simcoe Ave.

$60,000.00

h.   Artscape Inc.

155-163 Dundas St. E.

$210,000.00

           

2.       City Council grant authority for the City to enter into a delivery agreement with each of the above-mentioned not-for-profit corporations or such other associated parties as the City deems appropriate, for the delivery and administration of the home ownership assistance being provided from the City's Development Charges Reserve Fund (2009) for Subsidized Housing (XR2116), on terms and conditions determined by the Director, Affordable Housing Office and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

 

3.       City Council grant authority for the Director, Affordable Housing Office to execute the delivery agreement and any other agreements or documents required to give effect to the foregoing and to administer the ongoing grants by way of forgivable loans.

 

4.             City Council grant authority for the Director, Affordable Housing Office to determine when the above projects have reached an adequate and appropriate stage in terms of City Planning approvals and construction readiness to allow the funding to be securely advanced.

 

5.             City Council grant authority to the City Solicitor to execute any documents required to register security for the loans and to postpone, confirm the status of and discharge the loans.

 

6.      City Council increase the 2013 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) by $4,575,000 gross $0 net to provide additional funding for the eight affordable housing initiatives recommended in the report (June 7, 2013) from the Director, Affordable Housing and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management.

Origin

(June 7, 2013) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

This report recommends funding for eight new non-profit housing developments through the City’s Home Ownership Assistance Program (HOAP).  The developments recommended for Council’s consideration would provide 305 new affordable ownership homes for qualifying families and individuals and are being developed by three established non-profit groups: Habitat for Humanity Toronto, Home Ownership Alternatives, and Toronto Artscape.

 

These funding recommendations follow a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process run by the Affordable Housing Office (RFP No. 9155-13-7046). City funding will compensate the non-profit groups for the City development fees and charges paid on their developments and assist in making the homes more affordable by providing an average $15,000 down-payment assistance loan for eligible purchasers.

 

This is the second Home Ownership Assistance Program proposal call the City has undertaken, with the first in 2010 providing funding for 395 affordable homes in five developments. Improving affordable home ownership opportunities is supported by the City's 2010-2020 Affordable Housing Action Plan, Housing Opportunities Toronto, and funding and program eligibility for HOAP was approved by Council in 2010.

 

HOAP is an example of Council’s commitment to assisting our non-profit partners in providing affordable ownership opportunities to low and moderate-income Toronto households.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 7, 2013) Report with Appendix 1 from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Assisting New Home Owners: Affordable Home Ownership Assistance Program Allocations 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59870.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 27, 2013) E-mail from Peter Clarke (EX.New.EX33.36.1)
(July 2, 2013) Letter from Jens Lohmueller,CEO, Home Ownership Alternatives (HOA) (EX.Supp.EX33.36.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38731.pdf
(July 2, 2013) E-mail from Ene Underwood, CEO, Habitat for Humanity Toronto (EX.New.EX33.36.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38897.pdf
(June 28, 2013) E-mail from Robert Foster, Chair, and Tim Jones, President & CEO, Artscape (EX.New.EX33.36.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-38898.pdf

36a - Assisting New Home Owners: Affordable Home Ownership Assistance Program Allocations 2013

Origin
(June 24, 2013) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee
Summary

This report recommends funding for eight new non-profit housing developments through the City’s Home Ownership Assistance Program (HOAP).  The developments recommended for Council’s consideration would provide 305 new affordable ownership homes for qualifying families and individuals and are being developed by three established non-profit groups: Habitat for Humanity Toronto, Home Ownership Alternatives, and Toronto Artscape.

 

These funding recommendations follow a competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process run by the Affordable Housing Office (RFP No. 9155-13-7046). City funding will compensate the non-profit groups for the City development fees and charges paid on their developments and assist in making the homes more affordable by providing an average $15,000 down-payment assistance loan for eligible purchasers.

 

This is the second Home Ownership Assistance Program proposal call the City has undertaken, with the first in 2010 providing funding for 395 affordable homes in five developments. Improving affordable home ownership opportunities is supported by the City's 2010-2020 Affordable Housing Action Plan, Housing Opportunities Toronto, and funding and program eligibility for HOAP was approved by Council in 2010.

 

HOAP is an example of Council’s commitment to assisting our non-profit partners in providing affordable ownership opportunities to low and moderate-income Toronto households.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 24, 2013) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on Assisting New Home Owners - Affordable Home Ownership Assistance Program Allocations 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59964.htm
(June 7, 2013) Report and Appendix 1 from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Assisting New Home Owners: Affordable Home Ownership Assistance Program Allocations 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59963.pdf

EX33.37 - Exhibition Place - Agreement for Food and Beverage Services - Ovations Ontario Food Services LP

Consideration Type:
ACTION

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place to enter into an agreement with Ovations to provide exclusive food and beverage services to Direct Energy Centre and other buildings utilized for trade and consumer show venues on the substantial business terms and conditions set out in the draft agreement in the Request For Proposals (RFP), and any other such terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Executive Officer and City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council direct that the confidential report contained in Attachment 1 to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, not be released publicly in order to protect the competitive position and future economic interests of the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place

Summary

This report recommends that City Council authorize the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place (“the Board”) to enter into an agreement with Ovations Food Services, LP (Ovations) to provide exclusive food and beverage services to Direct Energy Centre (“DEC”) at Exhibition Place and the other buildings utilized for trade and consumer show venues for a term of eleven (11) years, (4) months, and fourteen (14) days commencing July 18, 2013, and terminating on November 30, 2024.  Ovations, a division of Comcast-Spectacor, operate in more than 120 venues in Canada and the United States servicing over 9 million guests and exceeding $250M in sales.

 

A public Request for Proposals for Food and Beverage Services (RFP) was issued through the City of Toronto, Finance Department, Purchasing and Material Management Division (PMMD) for the exclusive food and beverage services wherein two responses were received for this opportunity.  Following a lengthy evaluation, Ovations is being recommended as the Preferred Proponent. 

Background Information (Committee)

(May 31, 2013) Report with Appendix A from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place on Agreement for Food and Beverage Services - Ovations Ontario Food Services LP
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-59462.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

Audit Committee - Meeting 12

AU12.1 - City of Toronto - 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (AU12.1b with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer, as amended by the revisions outlined in the report (June 27, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The following individuals made presentations to the Audit Committee on the City of Toronto 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

         Giuliana Carbone, Treasurer, and Mike St. Amant, Director, Accounting Services, City of Toronto

 

-          Cathy Russell, Partner, and Brooke Ayer, Senior Manager, PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, Chartered Accountants.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present the City of Toronto's Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 to Council for approval and provide highlights of the City’s 2012 financial performance and financial condition as of December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer regarding the 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59812.pdf
Appendix A - 2012 Consolidated Financial Statements - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59813.pdf
Appendix B - Key Issues/Risks Facing the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59814.pdf
Appendix C - Glossary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59815.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Submission from PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, Chartered Accountants, headed "City of Toronto - 2012 Year-end Report to the Audit Committee"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59824.pdf
Submission from PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, Chartered Accountants, headed "City of Toronto Agencies and Corporations - PWC Summary of Additional Audit and Audit Related Fees"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59825.pdf
Presentation material submitted by the Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-60025.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 12, 2013) Supplementary Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer on Further Revisions to 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements (AU12.1b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60269.pdf
Revised Pages to Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60270.pdf

1a - Revisions to 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Origin
(June 27, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer
Summary

For the 2012 financial statements, the City's external auditors have audited the budget numbers for the first time.  Subsequent to forwarding of the financial statements to the Audit Committee, the auditors have requested a change to two budget values as a result of budgeting of tangible capital assets relating to the TTC.   The adjustments changed budget values only, and have resulted in the various changes to the report and financial statements.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 27, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer regarding Revisions to 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59989.pdf
Revised pages 20 and 23, to the report (June 18, 2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59990.pdf
Revised pages 6, 7 and 37, to Appendix A, headed "2012 Consolidated Financial Statements"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59991.pdf

AU12.2 - Status of the Financial Audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information, the report (June 18, 2013) from the Auditor General on the status of the financial audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the status of financial audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the year ended December 31, 2012.

 

The majority of the audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations have been completed and approved by their respective Boards.  Any financial statements that are outstanding will be available for the next Audit Committee meeting.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Auditor General regarding the Status of the Financial Audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the Year Ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59801.pdf

AU12.3 - Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 - Agencies and Corporations (Part 1)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege (as it relates to Item AU12.3e - Toronto Transit Commission - 2012 Financial Statements)

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information, the 2012 Financial Statements and related documents for the following agencies and corporations:

 

-           Exhibition Place

-           The Hummingbird Centre for the Performing Arts (operating as "The Sony Centre for the Performing Arts")

-           Toronto Public Library

-           St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts

-           Toronto Transit Commission

-           Toronto Zoo

-           Yonge-Dundas Square

-           Heritage Toronto

-           Toronto Atmospheric Fund

-           The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (operating as the Toronto Centre for the Arts)

-           Toronto Parking Authority.

 

2.         City Council direct that the Confidential Attachment (May 24, 2013) to the PricewaterhouseCoopers Audit Results report on the Toronto Transit Commission, remain confidential in its entirety, as it relates to advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

 

3.         City Council receive for information, the following details related to the 2012 Financial Statements of Exhibition Place:

 

a.         The sum of $1,854,663 has been transferred to the Exhibition Place Stabilization Fund being the surplus over budget for the CNEA Program.

 

b.         The sum of $2,764,148 has been transferred to the Exhibition Place Conference Centre Reserve Fund as recommended by City Council in 2007 being the surplus over budget for the consolidated Exhibition Place operations (save and except for the CNEA Program).

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Audit Committee received for information, the 2012 Financial Statements and related documents for the following corporations, having regard that the Statements have previously been considered by City Council:

 

-           Invest Toronto

-           Lakeshore Arena Corporation

-           Toronto Port Lands Company.

Summary

The following agencies and corporations have submitted 2012 Financial Statements and related documents to the Audit Committee for consideration:

 

         Exhibition Place

-          The Hummingbird Centre for the Performing Arts (operating as "The Sony Centre for the Performing Arts")

         Toronto Public Library

         St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts

         Toronto Transit Commission

         Toronto Zoo

         Yonge-Dundas Square.

 

In addition, City Council on June 11, 12 and 13, 2013, received and forwarded the 2012 Financial Statements of the following corporations to the Audit Committee for information:

 

-           Invest Toronto

-           Lakeshore Arena Corporation

-           Toronto Port Lands Company.

3a - Exhibition Place - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary
Consolidated Financial Statements for Exhibition Place for the year ended December 31, 2012.
Background Information (Committee)
(May 27, 2013) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, forwarding 2012 Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59857.pdf
Consolidated Financial Statements - Exhibition Place - as at December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59858.pdf
(May 27, 2013) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, forwarding 2012 Audit Results
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59859.pdf
Audit Results - Exhibition Place - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59860.pdf

3b - The Hummingbird Centre for the Performing Arts (operating as "The Sony Centre for the Performing Arts") - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary

Audited Financial Statements for The Hummingbird Centre for the Performing Arts (operating as "The Sony Centre for the Performing Arts") for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts - as at December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59851.pdf
Audit Results - Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59852.pdf

3c - Toronto Public Library Board - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Public Library Board as at December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
(July 5, 2013) Letter from the City Librarian, forwarding Audited Financial Statements and Audit Results for the Year Ended December 31, 2012 of the Toronto Public Library Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59588.pdf
Financial Statements - Toronto Public Library Board - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59589.pdf
Audit Results - Toronto Public Library Board - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59590.pdf

3d - St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts as at December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59559.pdf
Audit Results - St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59560.pdf

3e - Toronto Transit Commission - 2012 Financial Statements

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege
Summary

Consolidated Financial Statements for the Toronto Transit Commission for the year ended

December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 17, 2013) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, TTC, forwarding Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59835.pdf
Financial Statements - Toronto Transit Commission - December 31, 2012 (Part 1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59853.pdf
Financial Statements - Toronto Transit Commission - December 31, 2012 (Part 2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59854.pdf
(June 17, 2013) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, TTC, forwarding the Audit Results Report - Toronto Transit Commission
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59836.pdf
Audit Results - Toronto Transit Commission - for the year ended December 31, 2012 (Part 1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59855.pdf
Audit Results - Toronto Transit Commission - for the year ended December 31, 2012 (Part 2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59856.pdf

3f - Toronto Zoo - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Zoo for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
(April 11, 2013) Decision Letter from the Board of Management of the Toronto Zoo
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-57689.pdf
(April 5, 2013) Cover Report from the Chief Operating Officer, Toronto Zoo, forwarding 2012 Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-57690.pdf
Financial Statements - Toronto Zoo - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-57691.pdf
Audit Results - Toronto Zoo - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-57692.pdf

3g - Yonge-Dundas Square - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary
Financial Statements for Yonge-Dundas Square for the year ending December 31, 2012.
Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - Yonge-Dundas Square - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59846.pdf
Audit Results Letter - Yonge-Dundas Square - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59985.pdf

3k - Heritage Toronto - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for Heritage Toronto as at December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - Heritage Toronto, December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-60006.pdf

3l - Toronto Atmospheric Fund - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary

Consolidated Financial Statements for the Toronto Atmospheric Fund for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
Consolidated Financial Statement - Toronto Atmospheric Fund - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59984.pdf
Audit Results Letter - Toronto Atmospheric Fund - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-60007.pdf

3m - The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (operating as the Toronto Centre for the Arts) - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (operating as the Toronto Centre for the Arts) for the year ending December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (operating as the Toronto Centre for the Arts) - December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-60026.pdf
(June 26, 2013) Letter from Price Waterhouse Coopers regarding the presentation of the Financial Statements of The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-60027.pdf
Audit Results - The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-60028.pdf

3n - Toronto Parking Authority - 2012 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Parking Authority for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - Toronto Parking Authority - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-60031.pdf
Audit Results - Toronto Parking Authority - for the year ended December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-60032.pdf

AU12.4 - Arenas - 2012 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information, the 2012 audited financial statements of Arenas, attached as Appendices to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Auditor General.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Audit Committee requested the Auditor General to:

 

1.         Request officials from the William H. Bolton Arena to provide a written response to the issues raised in the Management Letter.

 

2.         Report to the October 31, 2013 meeting of the Audit Committee on this matter.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the 2012 audited financial statements of Arenas.

 

Audited 2012 financial statements have been completed for the eight City Arenas.  The external auditors, Grant Thornton LLP, advise that a management letter will be issued which identifies basic control deficiencies that would generally apply to all of the Arenas.  This management letter has not been finalized yet.

 

A separate management letter has also been issued which identifies control deficiencies at William H. Bolton Arena.  A response from management has not yet been received.  We will follow up on this response once it has been received.

 

The financial statements for the Forest Hill Memorial Arena, Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena, McCormick Playground Arena, Moss Park Arena and Ted Reeve Community Arena were not available at the time of preparation of this report but are expected to be available for the July 4, 2013 meeting of Audit Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Auditor General, providing 2012 Audited Financial Statements of Arenas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59750.pdf
Appendix 1: Committee of Management for the George Bell Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59751.pdf
Appendix 2: Board of Management for the North Toronto Memorial Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59752.pdf
Appendix 3: Committee of Management for the William H. Bolton Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59753.pdf
Appendix 4: Management Letter for William H. Bolton Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59754.pdf
Appendix 5: Committee of Management for the Forest Hill Memorial Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59755.pdf
Appendix 6: Committee of Management for the Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena (not yet available)
Appendix 7: Committee of Management for the McCormick Playground Arena (not yet available)
Appendix 8: Board of Management for the Moss Park Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59758.pdf
Appendix 9: Committee of Management for the Ted Reeve Community Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59759.pdf
Appendix 10: Management Letter (June 19, 2013) from Grant Thornton LLP, regarding the 2012 Audits of the City's Board-managed Arenas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59783.pdf

AU12.5 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2012 Audited Financial Statements - Report No. 1

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2012 audited financial statements and management letters of the forty-three (43) Business Improvement Areas attached as Appendices A to AR to the  report (June 17, 2013) from the Treasurer, and the Acting Director, Business Services, Economic Development and Culture.

Origin

(June 17, 2013) Report from the Treasurer, and the Acting Director, Business Services, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present the 2012 audited financial statements and management letters for forty-three (43) Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) to Audit Committee and City Council for its approval.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2013) Report from the Treasurer and the Acting Director of Business Services, Economic Development and Culture, submitting the 2012 Audited Financial Statements of Business Improvement Areas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59706.pdf
Appendix A: Baby Point Gates Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59707.pdf
Appendix B: Bloor Annex Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59708.pdf
Appendix C: Bloor Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59709.pdf
Appendix D: Bloor West Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59711.pdf
Appendix E: Bloor Yorkville Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59712.pdf
Appendix F: Bloorcourt Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59713.pdf
Appendix G: Cabbagetown Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59714.pdf
Appendix H: Chinatown Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59715.pdf
Appendix I: Church-Wellesley Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59716.pdf
Appendix J: Corso Italia Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59717.pdf
Appendix K: Crossroads of the Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59718.pdf
Appendix L: Danforth Mosaic Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59719.pdf
Appendix M: Danforth Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59720.pdf
Appendix N: Downtown Yonge Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59721.pdf
Appendix N-1: Downtown Yonge Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59722.pdf
Appendix O: Dovercourt Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59723.pdf
Appendix P: Fairbank Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59724.pdf
Appendix Q: Financial District Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59725.pdf
Appendix Q-1: Financial District Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59726.pdf
Appendix R: Forest Hill Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59727.pdf
Appendix S: Greektown on the Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59728.pdf
Appendix T: Harbord Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59729.pdf
Appendix U: Junction Gardens Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59730.pdf
Appendix V: Kennedy Road Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59731.pdf
Appendix W: Korea Town Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59732.pdf
Appendix X: Liberty Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59733.pdf
Appendix Y: Mimico Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59734.pdf
Appendix Z: Mirvish Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59735.pdf
Appendix AA: Mount Dennis Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59736.pdf
Appendix AB: Pape Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59737.pdf
Appendix AC: Parkdale Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59738.pdf
Appendix AD: Regal Heights Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59739.pdf
Appendix AE: Riverside Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59740.pdf
Appendix AF: Rosedale Main Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59741.pdf
Appendix AG: Sheppard East Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59742.pdf
Appendix AH: St. Clair Gardens Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59743.pdf
Appendix AI: St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59744.pdf
Appendix AJ: The Beach Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59746.pdf
Appendix AK: The Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59747.pdf
Appendix AL: The Eglinton Way Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59748.pdf
Appendix AM: The Waterfront Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59749.pdf
Appendix AN: Toronto Entertainment District Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59760.pdf
Appendix AN-1: Toronto Entertainment District Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59761.pdf
Appendix AO: Uptown Yonge Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59762.pdf
Appendix AP: Wexford Heights Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59763.pdf
Appendix AQ: Yonge-Lawrence Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59764.pdf
Appendix AR: A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani dated May 31, 2013 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59765.pdf

AU12.6 - Community Centres - 2012 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information, the 2012 audited financial statements of Community Centres, attached as Appendices to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Auditor General.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the 2012 audited financial statements of Community Centres.

           

The 2012 audited financial statements for the Community Centres are presented to Audit Committee after approval by their respective Boards of Management.  According to the accounting firm of Grant Thornton LLP, individual management letters were not issued for the Community Centres as there are no material control deficiencies to report.  We understand however that a general management letter will be issued which identifies basic control deficiencies that would have relevance to all of the Community Centres.  This management letter will be submitted to the next Audit Committee meeting. 

 

The financial statements for the 519 Church Street Community Centre, Applegrove Community Complex, and Ralph Thornton Community Centre were not available at the time of preparation of this report but are expected to be available for the July 4, 2013 meeting of Audit Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Auditor General, providing the 2012 Audited Financial Statements of the Community Centres
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59766.pdf
Appendix 1: Board of Management for the Cecil Street Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59767.pdf
Appendix 2: Central Eglinton Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59768.pdf
Appendix 3: Board of Management for Community Centre 55
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59769.pdf
Appendix 4: Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59770.pdf
Appendix 5: Board of Management for the Harbourfront Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59771.pdf
Appendix 6: Board of Management for the Scadding Court Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59772.pdf
Appendix 7: Board of Management for the Swansea Town Hall Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59773.pdf
Appendix 8: Board of Management for the 519 Church Street Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59774.pdf
Appendix 9: Applegrove Community Complex (not yet available)
Appendix 10: Board of Management for the Ralph Thornton Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59776.pdf
Appendix 11: Management Letter for Community Centres
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59777.pdf

AU12.7 - Trust Funds - 2012 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2012 Trust Fund Statements as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 18, 2013) from the Treasurer.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present the City of Toronto’s Consolidated Trust Funds Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 to City Council for approval and provide highlights of the Trust Funds' 2012 financial performance and financial condition as of December 31, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) Report from the Treasurer on the 2012 Audited Trust Funds Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59817.pdf
Appendix A - 2012 Trust Funds Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59818.pdf
Appendix B - Trust Fund Account Descriptions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59819.pdf

AU12.8 - Sinking Funds - 2012 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2012 Sinking Funds Statements as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 17, 2013) from the Treasurer.

Origin

(June 17, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present the City of Toronto’s Sinking Funds Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2012 to Council for approval and provide highlights of the Sinking Funds' 2012 financial performance and financial condition as of December 31, 2012. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2013) Report from the Treasurer regarding the 2012 Audited Sinking Funds Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59808.pdf
Appendix A: Financial Statements City of Toronto Sinking Funds December 31, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59809.pdf

AU12.9 - Auditor General's Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Divisions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property belonging to the City or one of its agencies and corporations, and litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies and corporations.

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the public release of the information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 7, 2013) from the Auditor General, at the discretion of the City Solicitor, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Origin

(June 7, 2013) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report provides information regarding the implementation status of audit recommendations contained in various reports issued by the Auditor General to City divisions.  On an annual basis the Auditor General reviews the implementation status of outstanding audit recommendations and reports the results of the review to Council through Audit Committee.

 

Since July 1, 2007 the Auditor General has issued various reports containing a total of 472 recommendations.  Since that time 13 of these recommendations have been identified by the Auditor General as no longer relevant.  Factors such as reorganizations and changes in business practices and service levels have rendered these recommendations no longer applicable.  Consequently, 459 of the 472 recommendations continue to have relevance.

 

Management has made progress on implementing outstanding audit recommendations.  However, a number of recommendations have been outstanding for a long period of time.  Our analysis indicates 42 recommendations have been outstanding for over three years and 11 of these recommendations are over five years old.  Management should take steps to implement these recommendations.  

 

The results of our review indicate management has fully implemented 340 or 74 per cent of the recommendations made by the Auditor General during the five year period from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2012.

 

From a historical perspective, the Auditor General has issued 1268 recommendations since January 1, 1999.  Management has fully implemented 90 per cent or 1138 of these 1268 recommendations.  Continued efforts to implement outstanding recommendations will provide additional benefit to the City through cost savings, additional revenue and enhanced service delivery.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 7, 2013) Report from the Auditor General regarding Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Divisions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59834.pdf

AU12.10 - Auditor General’s Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Agencies and Corporations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.          City Council receive for information, the report (June 11, 2013) from the Auditor General.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report provides information regarding the implementation status of audit recommendations contained in various reports issued by the Auditor General to City agencies and corporations.  On an annual basis the Auditor General reviews the implementation status of outstanding audit recommendations and reports the results of the review to City Council through Audit Committee.

 

Since July 1, 2007 the Auditor General has issued various reports to City Agencies and Corporations containing a total of 173 recommendations.  Since that time six of these recommendations have been identified by the Auditor General as no longer relevant.  These recommendations are no longer relevant as reorganizations and changes in business practices and service levels have rendered them no longer applicable.  Consequently, 167 of the 173 recommendations continue to have relevance.

 

The results of our review indicate that on a combined basis, City agencies and corporations have implemented 71 per cent or 118 of the 167 recommendations made by the Auditor General from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2012.

 

Continued efforts to implement outstanding recommendations will provide additional benefit to the City through cost savings, additional revenue and enhanced service delivery.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Report from the Auditor General regarding Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Agencies and Corporations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59780.pdf

AU12.11 - Auditor General’s Office - Forensic Unit Status Report on Outstanding Recommendations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.          City Council receive for information, the report (June 5, 2013) from the Auditor General.

Origin

(June 5, 2013) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report provides information regarding the implementation status of recommendations made by the Forensic Unit of the Auditor General’s Office which were publicly reported through Audit Committee.  These recommendations were made in the context of annual Fraud and Waste Hotline reports or other special reviews such as the 2012 report on Improving, Reporting and Monitoring of Employee Benefits.

On an annual basis, the Auditor General reviews information provided by management to determine the accuracy of management assertions related to each recommendation.  The results of this review are communicated to Council through Audit Committee.

Since January 2007, the Auditor General has issued various reports related to its operation of the City’s Fraud and Waste Hotline Program.  Since that time a total of 15 recommendations have been reported publicly.

The results of our review indicate management has not fully implemented seven outstanding recommendations made in reports by the Auditor General’s Forensic Unit from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2012.

Continued efforts to implement outstanding recommendations will provide additional benefit to the City through cost savings, additional revenue and enhanced service delivery.

As well, an additional 12 recommendations were made to management staff in the context of confidential investigation reports and have been fully implemented.  The implementation status of confidential recommendations is communicated directly to the City Manager.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 5, 2013) Report from the Auditor General regarding the Forensic Unit Status Report on Outstanding Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59789.pdf

AU12.12 - Implementation of Recommendations in Audit Report “311 Toronto - Full Potential For Improving Customer Services Has Yet To Be Realized”

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information, the report (June 10, 2013) from the Auditor General.

Origin

(June 10, 2013) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The implementation of recommendations contained in the 2011 audit report entitled “311 Toronto – Full Potential For Improving Customer Service Has Yet To Be Realized” was assessed in early 2013.  The purpose of this report is to inform the Audit Committee of the implementation status of recommendations in the 311 audit report.

 

The 2011 audit report contained 12 recommendations. Based on information provided by management staff and our independent analysis and verification, we have determined that nine recommendations have been fully implemented.  The remaining three recommendations were partially implemented.

 

Since our 2011 audit, 311 Toronto has significantly improved its call response capacity resulting in more calls being answered in a timely manner.  The percentage of calls answered within 30 seconds has increased from 35 per cent in 2011 to 66 per cent in 2013.  Equally important is fewer calls with wait time longer than three minutes.  In 2011, on average nine per cent of callers waited longer than three minutes before answered by an agent.  In 2013, only two per cent of callers needed to wait longer than three minutes for their calls to be answered.  The unplanned absent days per year, according to management staff, have decreased from an average of 22.9 days in 2011 to 16.2 days in 2012.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2013) Report from the Auditor General regarding the Implementation of Recommendations in Audit Report “311 Toronto - Full Potential For Improving Customer Services Has Yet To Be Realized”
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59779.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(July 4, 2013) Letter from Councillor Vincent Crisanti, Ward 1 - Etobicoke North (AU.New.AU12.12.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/comm/communicationfile-38849.pdf

AU12.13 - Continuous Controls Monitoring Program - Review of City Staff Absenteeism

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information, the report (May 31, 2013) from the Auditor General.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General’s Work Plan includes the development of a system of continuous controls monitoring for selected City expenses.  The objective of the Continuous Controls Monitoring Program is to provide periodic reports to management which assist in proactively monitoring financial transactions, detecting unusual expenses and identifying areas where internal controls could be strengthened.

 

The Continuous Controls Monitoring Program was initiated in 2011.  Initial expenses selected for the application of continuous controls monitoring were employee overtime and mileage reimbursements.  In 2012, the program was expanded to include standby pay.

 

In January 2013, the Auditor General further expanded the Continuous Controls Monitoring Program to include staff absences.  Our review includes staff absences resulting from sick time and bereavement.

 

This report includes the results of our analysis of staff absenteeism due to sickness and bereavement time for over 35,000 City employees during 2012.  The purpose of our analysis is to review absentee trends and costs and provide management with exceptions warranting further review.

 

Staff absences have a direct impact on divisional productivity and staff costs.  Additional staff costs result from employing replacement staff and staff overtime costs.

 

Staff absentee information will be provided to management on a periodic basis for comments and follow-up on unusual instances.  The first such set of exceptions was provided to management in May 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Auditor General regarding the Continuous Controls Monitoring Program - Review of City Staff Absenteeism
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59791.pdf

AU12.16 - Review of Wheel-Trans Services - Sustaining Level and Quality of Service Requires Changes to the Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee submits this Item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(June 25, 2013) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer

Summary

At its meeting on June 24, 2013, the Toronto Transit Commission considered a report entitled, “Staff Response to Auditor General’s Report – Review of Wheel-Trans Services – Sustaining Level and Quality of Service Requires Changes to the Program”.

 

The Commission:

 

1.         Received for information, the staff response to the Auditor General’s report, headed "Review of Wheel-Trans Series – Sustaining Level and Quality of Service Requires Changes to the Program".

 

2.         Forwarded the report to the City Audit Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 25, 2013) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, forwarding the TTC's response to the Auditor General's report regarding the Review of Wheel-Trans Services - Sustaining Level and Quality of Service Requires Changes to the Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59979.pdf
(June 24, 2013) Toronto Transit Commission Report 8(a) headed "Staff Response to Auditor General's Report - Review of Wheel-Trans Services - Sustaining Level and Quality of Service Requires Changes to the Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59980.pdf
(December 6, 2012) Report from the Auditor General, to the TTC, regarding the Review of Wheel-Trans Services - Sustaining Level and Quality of Service Requires Changes to the Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-59981.pdf

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 22

CA22.1 - Toronto Public Library Board - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Public Library Board

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Public Library Board, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until a successor is appointed.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

 

3.         City Council identify the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternates for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointments, in the order listed, should a vacancy occur during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the names of the candidates identified as alternates remain confidential until appointed as a member, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Civic Appointments Committee recessed its public session and met in closed session on June 5, 2013, to consider confidential information on this Item related to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Public Library Board.

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will interview candidates for appointment to the Toronto Public Library Board.

 

(The Interview Schedule will be forwarded under separate confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee and relevant officials only.  Copies of confidential applications and the confidential qualifications and diversity summary provided by the City Manager were previously distributed under confidential cover to the Members of the Civic Appointments Committee.)

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2013) Confidential Attachment - Interview Schedule for the Toronto Public Library Board

Declared Interests (Committee)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor James Pasternak - as his wife works for the the Toronto Public Library

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 23

CA23.1 - Toronto Licensing Tribunal - Appointments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014, and until successors are appointed.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees' names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.

 

3.         City Council identify the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternates for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointments, in the order listed, should a vacancy occur during the term.

 

4.         City Council direct that the names of the candidates identified as alternates remain confidential until appointed as a member, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Civic Appointments Committee recessed its public session and met in closed session on June 28, 2013, to consider confidential information on this Item related to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal.

Summary

The Civic Appointments Committee will interview candidates for appointment to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal.

 

(The Interview Schedule will be forwarded under separate confidential cover to Members of the Civic Appointments Committee and relevant officials only.  Copies of confidential applications and the confidential qualifications and diversity summary provided by the City Manager were previously distributed under confidential cover to the Members of the Civic Appointments Committee.)

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2013) Confidential Attachment - Interview Schedule for the Toronto Licensing Tribunal

Declared Interests (Committee)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor James Pasternak - as he has had campaign and financial dealings with two candidates

Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 22

CD22.1 - Recreation Service Plan 2013-2017 Implementation Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CD22.1.4 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the 2013-2017 Recreation Service Plan Implementation Plan attached as Appendix A to the report (June 12, 2013) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and refer the financial impacts to Budget Committee for consideration, noting that it may be amended as reports on priority centres, welcome policy, user fees and universal access, youth engagement strategy, and open streets have been reviewed be Committee and Council.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to fully participate in the youth consultation framework developed for the Youth Equity Strategy (Item CD22.8 Toronto Youth Equity Framework) and work with the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to identify points of integration, partnership and collaboration across departments and the two strategies.

 

3.         City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry to report to the September 18, 2013 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee on the Youth Engagement Strategy, at the same time as the Youth Equity Strategy.

 

4.         City Council support the elimination of leisure swimming fees for children and youth for 2014.

 

5.         City Council direct the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report on the review of user fees to the September 18, 2013 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee, and include the financial implications of eliminating of leisure swimming fees for children and youth in 2014.

 

6.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report on a strengthened capital plan for parks and recreation services during the 2014 budget process.

 

7.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in preparing for the 2014 Operating budget, to include the incremental costs of this Implementation Plan outside the regular staff budget setting targets.

 

8.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report back to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on expanding the Duke of Edinburgh award or a similar program.

 

9.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report back to the Community Development and Recreation Committee in early 2014 on expanding the use of school pools to the 4 to 6 p.m. period for use by the City's recreation division to achieve the goals of the Implementation program in early 2014.

 

10.       City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the October 28, 2013 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee on all matters, including youth engagement and the welcome policy usage review, that may have 2014 operating budget implications.

 

11.       City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee, with the upcoming reports in Fall 2013, on minimum requirements for Priority Centre programming, including capacity and hours, to be applied to all current and future Priority Centres.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee:

 

1.         Requested the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to consider the recommendations made in today's public presentations when reporting back to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on the Recreation Service Plan 2013-2017 Implementation Plan in the Fall of 2013.

Origin

(June 12, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report recommends an Implementation Plan for the City of Toronto 2013-2017 Recreation Service Plan.  The Plan was adopted by Council in November 2012.  The Recreation Service Plan will guide the City of Toronto's delivery of recreation programs and services over the next five years.

 

The Implementation Plan sets out the timelines, benchmark activities and resource requirements to implement the actions contained in the Recreation Service Plan.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Recreation Service Plan 2013 - 2017 Implementation Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59524.pdf
Appendix A - Recreation Service Plan Implementation Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59498.pdf

Speakers

Lishai Peel, Community Recreation for All and Toronto Women's City Alliance
Alex Murphy, Community Recreation for All
Mark Richardson
Terryl Knox Magbanua
Trevain Britton, Toronto Youth Cabinet
Carol Nash, Alpha II Alternative School
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Jeffrey Reitz (CD.New.CD22.1.1)
(June 26, 2013) E-mail from Mark J. Richardson (CD.New.CD22.1.2)
(June 26, 2013) Submission from Mark J. Richardson (CD.New.CD22.1.3)

Communications (City Council)

(June 26, 2013) Letter from Asma Ali, She Moves Toronto (CC.Main.CD22.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-38984.pdf

CD22.2 - Funding, Stabilization and Expansion of the After-School Recreation Care (ARC) Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to continue to deliver the After-School Recreation Care (ARC) program at the locations and fee rate agreed to as part of the funding requirements of the Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport (MTCS) for the duration of the current secure funding arrangement as outlined in the report (June 12, 2013) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to investigate future options for the expansion of After-School Recreation Care (ARC) as part of the implementation of the Recreation Service Plan, and consistent with the Middle Childhood Strategy, and in the context of the implementation of Full Day Kindergarten.

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to continue to work with Children's Services and the Province as the After-School Recreation Care (ARC) program partners in assessing future options for expansion.

 

4.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Children's Services to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee in October 2013 with the following:

 

a.         Options for a multi-year phased in expansion of After-School Recreation Care programs to other neighbourhoods of the City, including:

 

i.          proposed number of locations and enrolment per year;

 

ii.         expansion criteria for new site selection, consistent with other service plans and partners set out in recommendations 1 and 2;

 

iii.        projected costs (including all staffing and ancillary costs) and revenue requirements, including all existing revenue sources (Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport and the Social Service Stabilization Reserve);

 

iv.        other implementation considerations such as service level targets for locations and enrolment, equity objectives, organizational capacity, subsidy and eligibility issues, etc).

 

5.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to reconsider the Crescent Town site in the first quarter of 2014, taking into consideration the Full-Day Kindergarten Before and After School enrolment and the availability of other school age program options.

Origin

(June 12, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report responds to the October 12, 2012 direction from Council directing Parks, Forestry and Recreation to work with the Province to secure funding to stabilize the current After-School Recreation Care (ARC) program and develop a Business Case for the 2014 Operating Budget that would ensure the continuation of the current ARC program. The options for expanding the ARC program are also addressed.

The Report provides an update on the current status and funding for the After-School Recreation Care (ARC) program and recommends that Parks, Forestry and Recreation work with Children's Services and other funding partners to identify long-term funding and potential expansion options for the program.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2013) Report with Appendix A from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Funding, Stabilization and Expansion of the After-School Recreation Care (ARC) Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59491.pdf

Speakers

Amanda Penrice, Coalition Co-ordinator, Middle Childhood Matters Coalition Toronto
Councillor Janet Davis

CD22.3 - Full-Day Kindergarten Implementation Status Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council reaffirm the need for additional Provincial resources in the amounts of: $10.413 million in capital for child care outside of schools and $14.599 million in transitional/operating funds, to address the transitional impacts of full-day kindergarten on child care as requested by City Council in November 2011.

 

2.         City Council request that the Province of Ontario provide 1700 new child care fee subsidies to ensure equitable access to child care spaces for all age groups for low-income families, especially given the increasing number of spaces becoming available in the system for younger children whose care is more costly.

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services, in consultation with Legal Services, to negotiate a master/lease and operating agreement with the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) and the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) on behalf of Full-Day Kindergarten before and after school third-party operators that will:

 

a.         better reflect and solidify the partnership between School Boards, third-party operators, the City and families;

 

b.         reduce occupancy costs charged to third-party operators of Full-Day Kindergarten before and after programs;

 

c.         ensure that space provided for third-party operators of Full-Day Kindergarten before and after programs meets provincial licensing and City operating criteria;

 

d.         ensure sharing of equipment and space in Full-Day Kindergarten before and after programs, and other provisions that recognize that Schools Boards, the City and child care operators share responsibility for a successful early learning system;

 

e.         establish a better survey registration system that provides continuity to operators.

 

4.         City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services to report to the September 18, 2013 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee on the feasibility and impacts of keeping wage subsidy payments available for child care centres that are re-configuring services for younger children until such time as the new funding model is implemented.

 

5.         City Council request that the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) extends their Full-Day Kindergarten Capital allocation to full time outdoor Full-Day Kindergarten classrooms, such as the Equinox school.

 

6.         City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services to identify the "hot spots" in all Ward(s) where implementation of Full-Day Kindergarten/Full-Day Learning is proving difficult for working families requiring care, and continue to work with schools and childcare centres to develop an appropriate neighborhood multi-year transition plan for ongoing quality before and aftercare, and report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee, specifically with a review of options for Children's Circle's expansion to serve infants.

 

7.         City Council request the General Managers of Children's Services, Toronto Employment and Social Services and Economic Development and Culture to jointly report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee prior to the end of 2013 on the financial and social services impact of the availability of child care on sustaining employment. 

 

8.         City Council request that the Ministry of Education and Boards of Education work together with the City to ensure that the level of funding for the provision of child care services and that the transition schedule be sensitive to the needs of service providers.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Manager, Children's Services, gave a presentation to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on Full-Day Kindergarten Implementation – Status Update.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Children’s Services

Summary

This report provides an update on the implementation of Full-Day Kindergarten (FDK) and the transition to an integrated early learning and care system.  FDK implementation is currently in the third year of a five year process. The report reviews the resources that have been requested from the Province, what has been received to date and what is still required. This report also updates the Ward Analysis, which projects the licensed child care capacity in each city ward at full implementation of the program.  This analysis was first reported to City Council in November 2011. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Report with Appendix A from the General Manager of Children’s Services on Full-Day Kindergarten Implementation Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59501.pdf
(June 26, 2013) Staff Presentation on Full-Day Kindergarten Implementation Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59988.pdf

Speakers

Dubie Cunningham, President, Whitney Child Care Centre Board
Kim Challenger , Supervisor, Whitney Child Care Centre Board
Adrienne Lee, Board Members, Children Circle Day Care
Cheryl De Gras, Toronto Coalition for Better Child Care
Andrea Calver, Coordinator , Ontario Coalition for Better Child Care
June Hall, Main Square Day Care Centre
Cathy O'Toole, Plains Road Child Care
Melody Johnson, Plains Road Child Care
Lisa Winters , Beatty Buddies Child Care
Deborah Warner, Tiago Child Care
Miguel Avila
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(May 28, 2013) E-mail from Nancy Lalicon (CD.Supp.CD22.3.1)
(June 24, 2013) Letter from Donna Spreitzer, Jackman Community Daycare (CD.New.CD22.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/comm/communicationfile-38715.pdf
(June 26, 2013) Letter from Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Chair, Community Development and Recreation Committee (CD.New.CD22.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/comm/communicationfile-38703.pdf

CD22.4 - First Phase of Schools First Child Care Capital Retrofit Policy Implementation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services to report through Community Development and Recreation Committee when the Toronto District School Board has confirmed sites for funding under the first phase of the Schools-First Child Care Capital Retrofit Policy and once child care operators have been notified by the school board.

 

2.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to provide additional fee subsidy to ensure that the spaces created under the Schools-First Child Care Capital Retrofit Policy are accessible to low-income families.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

The Ministry of Education's Schools-First Child Care Capital Retrofit Policy provides $113.0 million over three years to school boards across Ontario.  This funding will convert current licensed school-based child care spaces for four and five-year olds to spaces that can be licensed for younger children, birth to 3.8 years (before kindergarten age).  Under the policy, school boards must work jointly with municipalities to determine how they will use the funding.  This report outlines the process and criteria used for determining schools recommended for capital investment under the provincial policy.

 

This report identifies sites selected in the first phase of this policy in the Toronto Catholic District School Board (TCDSB) and Toronto locations in the Conseil Scolaire Viamonde and Conseil scolaire de district catholique Centre-Sud.  Toronto District School Board (TDSB) facility staff are still finalizing their plans and acquiring necessary approvals within the board.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Report with Appendix A from the General Manager, Children's Services on First Phase of Schools First Child Care Capital Retrofit Policy Implementation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59509.pdf

CD22.5 - Toronto Child Care Funding Model

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Children's Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CD22.5a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse principles and evaluation criteria contained in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2013) from the General Manager, Children's Services, as amended by recommendation 2, and instruct staff to use these tools to guide development of a new child care funding model for the City of Toronto.

 

2.         City Council add an additional principle to the list in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2013) from the General Manager, Children's Services that expressly addresses the need to keep childcare affordable fees.

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services, to report to the February 2014 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee on a recommended child care funding model and implementation strategy.

 

4.         City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services to organize a summit for parents in the Fall, using the funds set aside for this purpose in the 2013 budget.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee:

 

1.         Requested the General Manager, Children's Services to report directly to City Council with a supplementary report that summarizes the results of the consultations to date.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

This report describes the new provincial child care funding framework that was announced in December, 2012 and defines the way in which municipalities are funded by the Province.  The report also outlines the process through which the framework will be customized to create a "made in Toronto" funding model for child care programs and families.  Draft principles guiding development of the model and evaluation criteria for assessing various options are presented for Council approval. These principles and criteria reflect input from a diversity of child care stakeholders.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Report with Appendix A from the General Manager, Children's Services on Toronto Child Care Funding Model
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59513.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 9, 2013) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Children's Services on Toronto Child Care Funding Model Consultation Report and Appendix A, City of Toronto Child Care Funding Model Principles and Evaluation Criteria Consultations (CD22.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60139.pdf
Appendix B - City of Toronto Child Care Funding Model Principles and Criteria Market Research Study: Ipsos Qualitative, Executive Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60212.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Janet Davis

CD22.6 - Welfare of Immigrant Children

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications CD22.6.3 and CD22.6.4 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Children's Services to continue working with other orders of government, child protection agencies, school boards and other relevant agencies in order to address lack of data and coordination gaps related to services for  immigrant children.

 

2.         City Council request the Government of Canada to establish a data collection system at Canada's ports of entry to facilitate gathering of accurate statistics on unaccompanied minors as well as children that arrive to Canada to be reunited with their parents and/or step parents, and share this information as appropriate with the child welfare services.

 

3.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Child and Family Services Act so that it is consistent with Canada's international obligations from the Child's Rights Convention so that all children under the age of 18 could qualify as in need of protection.

 

4.         City Council request that both the Government of Canada and the Province of Ontario work together to establish a formal procedure to ensure all newcomer children are enrolled in the school system.

 

5.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Children's Services to report back to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on the results of work.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Children's Services

Summary

In 2012, media coverage of a young immigrant's death drew attention to the potential for the isolation and abuse of newcomer children, and brought to light coordination gaps between Canada's immigration, settlement and child protection systems. These gaps can contribute to the vulnerability of immigrant children to abuse and neglect, specifically children that immigrate to Canada to be reunited with their parent(s) after a long period of separation.

 

This report responds to the Community Development and Recreation Committee request for investigation related to the issue of immigrant children suffering abuse. The report provides an outline of the findings and work to date, highlighting risk factors and coordination gaps between immigration authorities, child protection and other agencies.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Report with Appendices A and B from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Children's Services on Welfare of Immigrant Children
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59517.pdf

Speakers

Audrey Campbell, Jamaican Canadian Association

Communications (Committee)

(June 24, 2013) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson (CD.New.CD22.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/comm/communicationfile-38617.pdf
(June 26, 2013) Letter from Courtney Betty, Senior Partner, Betty's Law Office, Barristers & Solicitors (CD.New.CD22.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/comm/communicationfile-38632.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2013) Letter from Audrey Campbell, President, Jamaican Canadian Association, submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson (CC.New.CD22.6.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39145.pdf
(July 15, 2013) Letter from Ileen Pat Howell, President, Markham African Caribbean Association, submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson (CC.New.CD22.6.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39146.pdf

CD22.7 - Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 Implementation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to submit a business case through the 2014 and future years’ budgets to implement the Strong Neighbourhood Strategy as set out in the report (June 12, 2013) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration.

Origin

(June 12, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report provides an update on the implementation to date of the Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 (TSNS 2020), which was adopted by Council in March 2012.  A final report on the roll out of the Strategy will be considered by the Community Development and Recreation Committee at its December 3, 2013 meeting, and full implementation of the Strategy will begin in 2014.

 

Much of the work required to implement TSNS 2020 has taken place as a part of Urban HEART @Toronto, a research project of the City, the Centre for Research on Inner City Health, United Way Toronto and other community partners.  The project is now nearing completion, and its results will be used to establish measures in five policy areas that TSNS 2020 will set targets against:  Physical Environment and Infrastructure, Social and Human Development, Economic Opportunity, Governance, and Health. 

 

Urban HEART @Toronto measures will be used to identify a series of Neighbourhood Improvement Areas (NIAs) for focused City attention.  Consultations with residents, Councillors, community and government funders, the private sector, the community sector, and City Divisions, Agencies and Corporations, will be held in September and focus on four key issues:

 

1.         How should the Urban HEART @Toronto indicators be used to set criteria and select Neighbourhood Improvement Areas?

2.         What targets should the City set for its performance against these indicators?

3.         What additional criteria should be considered to select Neighbourhood Improvement Areas?

4.         What information should the City track and report to understand whether its efforts are making a difference in Neighbourhood Improvement Areas and other neighbourhoods?

 

A maximum of twelve NIAs and regular reporting on the wellbeing of neighbourhoods against the measures developed by Urban HEART @Toronto can be supported within existing resources.  The report describes the estimated resources required to support additional NIAs and evaluate the Strategy's impact.  The Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration will report to the September 18, 2013 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee on options and priorities to ensure the Strategy's broader implementation.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Toronto Strong Neighbourhoods Strategy 2020 Implementation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59534.pdf

Speakers

Teferi Assefa, President and CEO, Multicultural Solidarity for a Culture of Peace Foundation Inc. (MUSCUP)
Councillor Janet Davis

Communications (Committee)

(June 24, 2013) E-mail from Teferi Assefa, President and CEO, Muscup Peace Foundation Inc. (CD.New.CD22.7.1)
(June 26, 2013) Submission from Teferi Assefa (CD.New.CD22.7.2)

CD22.8 - Toronto Youth Equity Framework

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the Framework for the development of a Toronto Youth Equity Strategy contained in Appendix 1 to the report (June 12, 2013) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration.

 

2.         City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, in consultation with the Chief of Police, the Medical Officer of Health, the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, the Chief Librarian, Toronto Public Library, the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Acting General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, to review current service levels supporting youth at risk of marginalization and report to the September 18, 2013 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee as to options and priorities for increasing service supports for youth at risk in Toronto.

 

3.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to include a gender-based analysis when addressing the issues facing high-risk youth in communities in the development and implementation of the Toronto Youth Equity Strategy.

Origin

(June 12, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

The purpose of this report is to respond to City Council’s request for an update on Provincial-Municipal actions related to The Review of the Roots of Youth Violence and The Ontario Youth Action Plan, and to detail a framework for the development of a Toronto Youth Equity Strategy. 

 

The 2008 Provincial Task Force Co-Chaired by the Hon. Roy McMurtry and Hon. Dr. Alvin Curling identified 30 recommendations to address the symptoms and underlying causes of youth violence and marginalization.  While governments and their community partners have implemented a number of youth programs, services and initiatives since the McMurtry-Curling Review was completed, staff analysis indicates that few Provincial actions have addressed the causes and effects of youth marginalization as detailed in the Review of the Roots of Youth Violence report.

 

Four years after Roots, the Province launched the Ontario Youth Action Plan in the wake of the Eaton Centre and Danzig shootings. While the Plan has committed to actions that will benefit youth across Ontario, it does not specifically target those youth most at risk to violence and victimization. It also does not initiate any significant Provincial-Municipal partnership in support of high risk youth in response to the McMurtry-Curling Review or to advance the Ontario Youth Action Plan.

 

Despite some strategic youth actions since the McMurty-Curling Review, there still remains a significant need for a comprehensive, holistic and targeted approach to support youth at high risk of marginalization. In response, this report details a framework for the development of a Toronto Youth Equity Strategy to support high risk youth. It also recommends that City staff report back to the September meeting of Community Development and Recreation Committee, identifying potential program initiatives that the City can implement to address the needs of youth at high risk of marginalization through the 2014 City Budget process.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2013) Report with Appendices 1 to 4 from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Toronto Youth Equity Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-59536.pdf

Speakers

Sharma Queiser, Social Planning Toronto
Lesley Johnston , Social Planning Toronto
Lana Feinstein, Executive Director, Leave Out Violence (Submission Filed)
Catherine Soplet
Louis March, Zero Gun Violence Movement
Lorna Weigand, Middle Children Matters Coalition
David Morales, Toronto Community Housing Corporation
Terryl Knox Magbanua
Alexander Lovell, Youth Anti-violence Taskforce (Submission Filed)
Ryan Endoh, Toronto Youth Cabinet
Trevain Britton, Toronto Youth Cabinet
Joshua Stern, Hope House Youth Charities – The Joshua Project
Amanda Penrice, Coalition Co-ordinator, Middle Childhood Matters Coalition Toronto
Mark V. Campbell, Nia Centre for the Arts
Dr. Alvin Curling, Ministry of Children and Youth Services

Communications (Committee)

(June 26, 2013) E-mail from Asam Ahmad and Najla Edwards, Metropolitan Action Committee on Violence Against Women and Children (CD.New.CD22.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/comm/communicationfile-38705.pdf
(June 26, 2013) E-mail from Vathanan Jegatheesan (CD.New.CD22.8.2)
(June 26, 2013) Submission from Lana Feinstein (CD.New.CD22.8.3)
(June 26, 2013) Submission from Alexander Lovell (CD.New.CD22.8.4)

Economic Development Committee - Meeting 23

ED23.2 - Collaboration for Competitiveness: Strengthening High Value Sectors - Technology (Implementation Action 4)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse the collaborative initiatives being undertaken by staff in partnership with the industry to support the growth of the Tech sector in Toronto.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

1.         Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to develop a strategy to assist small Toronto-based firms in the Tech sector with their recruitment space and expansion efforts and to report back to the Economic Development Committee at its meeting on September 17, 2013.

 

2.         Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to further consult with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to see if there are opportunities to provide incentives to encourage growth of the Tech industry within its areas of intensification and to report back to the Economic Development Committee for its October 24, 2013 meeting.

Origin

(June 17, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to highlight City and private sector initiatives to strengthen the Tech sector in Toronto through a collaborative approach that connects the various subsectors and stakeholders, identifies opportunities and issues, facilitates entrepreneurial growth and job creation, and builds the talent pool.  These initiatives are part of the implementation of Collaborating for Competitiveness:  A Strategic Plan for Accelerating Economic Growth and Job Creation in Toronto.

 

Given Toronto's diverse economy and strengths in many sectors, Toronto has tremendous opportunities to leverage its economic diversity and excel in the Tech sector.  However, future growth cannot be taken for granted.  Ensuring an adequate supply of talent, entrepreneurial space for start-ups and early stage growth firms and improving access to finance are critical to sustaining economic growth in Toronto.  

 

Although Toronto has a critical mass of talent, including access to a large talent pool from the post secondary institutions, the expansion of the Tech sector both locally and globally and the application of technology in all sectors has led to increased competition for talent.  To retain and grow the city's internationally competitive talent base will require collaborative efforts to ensure a supportive business climate, ongoing networking activities, and activities and events that create global 'buzz' that promotes Toronto to the world.

 

Economic Development and Culture Division staff have been working with industry partners, colleges and universities, and other city ABCCDs to attract new investment and retain and expand the talent base by coalescing the disparate elements of the sector, initiating or supporting B2B, B2G and B2C networks, facilitating linkages in the supply chain, removing barriers to growth such as crowdfunding limitations, and working to align government policies and programs to support innovation and business growth.

 

The availability of entrepreneurial space and access to capital remain a challenge but are improving as a result of City initiatives to incent and accelerate development and private sector investment to collaborate in growing Toronto's Tech sector.

 

These initiative aligns with the city's new economic growth and cultural strategies 'Collaborating for Competitiveness' and 'Creative Capital Gains' which support facilitating workforce development, helping small and medium sized enterprises to form and prosper, attracting investment and strengthening high-value sectors.  As the world and the city move toward a more knowledge based economy it is essential that the efforts to build and expand the Tech sector continue.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Collaboration for Competitiveness: Strengthening High Value Sectors - Technology (Implementation Action 4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-59260.pdf
(June 25, 2013) Presentation by Sunil Sharma, Managing Director - Extreme Startups
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-59882.pdf

Speakers

John Ruffolo, Chief Executive Officer, Omers Ventures
Omar Rashid, Microsoft Canada
Sunil Sharma, Managing Director, Stem 7 Capital & CoFounder, Extreme Startups (Submission Filed)

Communications (Committee)

(June 25, 2013) Presentation from Sunil Sharma, Managing Director, Extreme Startups (ED.New.ED23.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/comm/communicationfile-38630.pdf

ED23.3 - Acceptance of Bequest Donation to Spadina Museum: Historic House and Gardens

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the acceptance of the bequest donation to Spadina Museum in the amount of $200,000.00.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the acceptance of a bequest donation in the amount of $200,000.00 to Spadina Museum:  Historic House and Gardens, in accordance with the City's donations policy.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Acceptance of Bequest Donation to Spadina Museum: Historic House and Gardens
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-59262.pdf

ED23.4 - Multi-year Agreements with Major Cultural Organizations and Local Arts Service Organizations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to enter into a multi-year agreement with each of the following eleven Major Cultural Organizations, (the Art Gallery of Ontario; Canada's National Ballet School; Canadian Opera Company; Festival Management Committee [Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto]; George R. Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art; National Ballet of Canada; Pride Toronto; Toronto Artscape Inc.; Toronto Festival of Arts, Culture and Creativity (operates as Luminato); Toronto International Film Festival Group; and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra; and each of the following six Local Arts Service Organizations (Arts Etobicoke, East End Arts, Lakeshore Arts, North York Arts, Scarborough Arts, and UrbanArts Community Arts Council) subject to:

 

a.         the satisfaction of the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, the City Solicitor, the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer; and

 

b.         the following Terms and Conditions:

 

i.          the City's grants policies as established by City Council;

 

ii.         that each organization submit its annual funding request to the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, for recommendation to the Economic Development Committee and City Council for review and approval;

 

iii.        that each organization submit its annual report and financial audit to the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, for review; and

 

                        iv.        for a period of five (5) years.

 

2.        City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report recommends the implementation of multi-year agreements with each of the eleven not-for-profit organizations that receive annual municipal support through the Major Cultural Organizations (MCOs) program and each of the six not-for-profit organizations that receive annual municipal support through the Local Arts Service Organizations (LASOs) program.

 

These multi-year agreements provide the terms and conditions of the grants to the recipient organizations, ensuring accountability for the funding and stabilizing the funding relationship. The majority of the Major Cultural Organizations and the Local Arts Service Organizations had five-year multi-year agreements in place from 2007 – 2011 that have since expired. This report seeks to review the terms of these funding agreements and seek their renewal, as well as put new agreements in place with those organizations that have not had agreements in place.

 

Delegated authority is sought to enter into multi-year agreements with the eleven recipients of funding through the Major Cultural Organizations: the Art Gallery of Ontario; Canada's National Ballet School; Canadian Opera Company; Festival Management Committee (Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto); George R. Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art; National Ballet of Canada; Pride Toronto; Toronto Artscape Inc.; Toronto Festival of Arts, Culture and Creativity (operates as Luminato); Toronto International Film Festival Group; and the Toronto Symphony Orchestra; and six Local Arts Service Organizations: Arts Etobicoke, East End Arts, Lakeshore Arts, North York Arts, Scarborough Arts, and UrbanArts Community Arts Council.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Multi-year Agreements with Major Cultural Organizations and Local Arts Service Organizations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-59224.pdf

ED23.6 - Intention to Expand shoptheQueensway.com Business Improvement Area

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the area described by Attachment 1 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as an expanded Business Improvement Area (BIA) under Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the City Clerk to send out a notice of City Council's intention to expand the boundary of the shoptheQueensway.com Business Improvement Area to include the areas as shown in Attachment 1 to this report, in accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

 

3.         City Council request the Executive Director of Technical Services to prepare designating by-law maps of the area, as described in Attachment 1 to this report, and submit them to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the City Clerk conduct a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to expand the boundaries of shoptheQueensway.com Business Improvement Area (BIA) as per Attachment 1.

 

Upon completion of the poll, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture will report the results to the Economic Development Committee.  Subject to a positive poll result, staff shall prepare the necessary by-law and bills to give effect thereto.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Intention to Expand shoptheQueensway.com Business Improvement Area
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-59247.pdf

ED23.7 - Proposed Dufferin-Finch Business Improvement Area (BIA) Poll Results

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West
Attention
Bill 1115 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate, based on the poll results respecting the intention to designate Dufferin-Finch Business Improvement Area (BIA), the area described by Attachment 1 to the report (May 29, 2013) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the Dufferin-Finch Business Improvement Area (BIA), under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment 1 to this report as the Dufferin-Finch Business Improvement Area.

 

3.         City Council approve those amendments necessary to Schedule "A" of Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, to include the Dufferin-Finch Business Improvement Area (BIA).

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that the area shown on Attachment 1 be designated as the Dufferin-Finch Business Improvement Area (BIA).

 

In accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code ("Chapter 19"), the City Clerk conducted a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to designate the Dufferin-Finch area as a BIA.

 

The City received sufficient number of ballots to validate the poll and the majority of accepted ballots were in favour of establishing a BIA.  Accordingly, it is recommended that City Council pass a by-law to designate the area described by the map in Attachment 1 as the Dufferin-Finch Business Improvement Area (BIA).

Background Information (Committee)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Proposed Dufferin-Finch Business Improvement Area (BIA) Poll Results
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-59248.pdf

Government Management Committee - Meeting 23

GM23.1 - Apportionment of Property Taxes - June 17, 2013 Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the apportionment of property taxes in the amounts identified in Appendix A and Appendix B of the report (May 21, 2013) from the Treasurer, under the columns entitled "Apportioned Tax" and "Apportioned Phase In/Capping".

Origin

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

The process of redistributing outstanding property taxes from one parcel of land to many newly created properties following a severance or re-development of land is referred to as "the apportionment of taxes".

 

This report deals with 33 tax apportionment applications made by the Treasurer or to the Treasurer by an owner of land pursuant to section 322 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the properties listed in Appendices A and B of the report (May 21, 2013) from the Treasurer. 

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting at which the applicants and / or property owners may express any concerns.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.

 

Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Treasurer on Apportionment of Property Taxes - June 17, 2013 Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58525.pdf
(May 21, 2013) Appendix A - Apportionment Report - Taxpayer Initiated Tax Apportionments as of May 13, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58526.pdf
(May 21, 2013) Appendix B - Apportionment Report - Treasurer Initiated Tax Apportionments as of May 13, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58527.pdf

GM23.2 - Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - June 17, 2013 Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to Section 323 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as provided in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix A attached to the report (May 21, 2013) from the Treasurer, excluding the following application:

 

Appeal

Number

Ward

Number

 

Property Address

2012001052

27

38 Yorkville Ave

 

 

 

 

 

2.         City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to Section 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping amounts) identified in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix B of the report (May 21, 2013) from the Treasurer.

Origin

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report deals with tax appeal applications made to the Treasurer pursuant to sections 323 and 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA).  Section 323 permits Council to cancel, reduce or refund taxes in cases when, during the year, a property undergoes changes such as when it is destroyed by fire or demolished, becomes exempt from taxation, or is reclassified due to a change in use.  Under section 325 of the COTA, taxpayers can request a cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes when an error in the assessment roll is identified which results in an overcharge.

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting where applicants may make a submission in defence of their position.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.

 

Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Treasurer on Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - June 17, 2013 Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58475.pdf
(May 21, 2013) Appendix A - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 323 of COTA, Hearing 2013H3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58476.pdf
(May 21, 2013) Appendix B - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 325 of COTA, Hearing 2013H3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58477.pdf

GM23.4 - Approval to Initiate and Participate in Assessment Appeals

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Treasurer to proceed with the assessment appeals identified in Attachment 1 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Treasurer.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Treasurer to participate in the assessment appeals initiated by property owners, as identified in Attachment 2 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Treasurer, and approve the actions taken to date by Revenue and Legal Services staff in respect to these appeals.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Director of Revenue Services and/or his designate, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to take all steps appropriate to deal with all of the appeals identified in the report (June 3, 2013) from the Treasurer, including authority to withdraw appeals filed by the City or to end the City’s participation or to execute Minutes of Settlement or other settlement agreements.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, based on consultation and instructions from the Director of Revenue Services and/or his designate, to take all steps appropriate to deal with all of the appeals identified in the report (June 3, 2013) from the Treasurer, including authority to withdraw appeals filed by the City or to end the City’s participation or to execute Minutes of Settlement or other settlement agreements.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report identifies those properties where, as a result of staff review and analysis, the Director of Revenue Services has initiated assessment appeals at the Assessment Review Board (ARB) and is now seeking authorization to proceed with those appeals.  The appeals are intended to correct assessments that have been incorrectly classified, under-valued, or wrongly returned on the 2013 assessment roll. In addition, staff are requesting authorization to actively participate in various owner-initiated appeals in order to protect the City’s interests.

 

If the recommendations put forward in this report are adopted, Revenue Services and the City Solicitor's office will proceed to prepare the City's position on a case-by-case basis.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Treasurer on Approval to Initiate and Participate in Assessment Appeals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59103.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Attachment 1 - Appeals Initiated by the Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59104.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Attachment 2 - City Participation in Taxpayer-Initiated Appeals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59105.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Attachment 3 - Summary of Criteria Approved by City Council in 2006
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59146.pdf

GM23.5 - Update on Discussions with OLG on the Charitable Bingo and Gaming Revitalization Initiative (eBingo)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the City enter into an agreement with the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) related to the Charitable Bingo and Gaming Revitalization Initiative.

 

2.         City Council permit Toronto bingo halls to participate in the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation's Charitable Bingo and Gaming Revitalization Initiative in order to offer electronic bingo and other electronic games in bingo halls.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to enter into the necessary agreements with the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation in a form substantially as set out in Appendix "H" to the report (April 25, 2013) from the City Clerk and the City Solicitor, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Clerk and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to execute the Charitable Gaming Centre Municipality Agreements on behalf of the City of Toronto.

 

5.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.

Origin

(April 25, 2013) Report from the City Clerk and the City Solicitor

Summary

The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) has introduced the Charitable Bingo and Gaming Revitalization Initiative (eBingo) aimed at preserving and enhancing the bingo industry and sustaining revenues for local charities.  The Initiative requires the City, hall operators and charities to enter into a multi-year agreement with the OLG for the provision of services.

 

City Council at its February 20 and 21, 2013 meeting had a report before it which provided an update on discussions with the OLG on a form of agreement satisfactory to the City, particularly with regard to the length of the term of the agreement and a method to mitigate the decline in City revenues.

 

At that meeting City Council requested the City Clerk to conduct further negotiations with the OLG and to report back to the May 13, 2013 meeting of the Government Management Committee on the outcome of the negotiations.  Council also requested the City Solicitor to report on the ability of charitable bingo gaming sites to add slot machines or convert the sites to a casino.

 

This report provides an update on the further discussions held with the OLG.  Attached is the original report which needs to be considered with this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 25, 2013) Report from the City Clerk and City Solicitor on Update on Discussions with OLG on the Charitable Bingo and Gaming Revitalization Initiative (eBingo)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58666.pdf
(May 2, 2012) Attachment - Report from the City Clerk on Charitable Bingo and Gaming Revitalization Initiative
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58667.pdf
(May 2, 2012) Appendices A to I attached to the report (May 2, 2012) from the City Clerk
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-58668.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Frances Nunziata

Communications (Committee)

(June 13, 2013) Letter from Lynn Cassidy, Executive Director, Ontario Charitable Gaming Association (GM.New.GM23.5.1)

GM23.6 - Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North - Status Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention

Communications GM23.6.2 to GM23.6.6 have been submitted on this Item.

Will be considered as the first item of business on Thursday July 18

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report provides an update on the St. Lawrence Market North redevelopment initiative, including a revised business case based on current market conditions and forecasts. 

 

The forecast cost for the building has risen from $74.89 million originally provided in the 2010 Capital Budget and 2011-2019 Capital Plan to a current estimate of $91.46 million. It is recommended that design work continue, and the necessary budget adjustment(s) be referred to the 2014 Capital Budget Process. The principal benefits that will result from the project's completion include:

 

           Significant improvement to a City landmark and tourist destination

           Improved compatibility with the heritage character of other buildings in the St. Lawrence Market complex and neighborhood

           Increased parking capacity (through the construction of 250 new underground spaces) which will replace some of the local parking currently being lost as a result of new building developments in the area

           Service improvements resulting from the consolidation of Court Services operations into one location (this service would otherwise be accommodated in three locations)

           Creation of attractive new interior spaces that can be used for a variety of community and commercial purposes

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer on Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North - Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59156.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix A - Location Map - Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North - Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59157.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix B - Updated Business Case - Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North - Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59158.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix C - Design Images - Redevelopment of St. Lawrence Market North - Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59159.pdf

Speakers

John Sewell
Rollo Myers, St. Lawrence Market North Working Group
Councillor Paul Ainslie
Councillor Frances Nunziata

Communications (Committee)

(June 14, 2013) Letter from John Sewell (GM.New.GM23.6.1)

Communications (City Council)

(July 8, 2013) Letter from Steve Lowden, President, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (CC.Main.GM23.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-38980.pdf
(July 9, 2013) E-mail from Marlene Cook (CC.Main.GM23.6.3)
(July 9, 2013) Letter from Suzanne Kavanagh, Member, North Market Working Group, St. Lawrence Market Complex (CC.Main.GM23.6.4)
(July 10, 2013) Letter from Paul Reuber, Architect, Bruno Leps, President MTCC 628, and Richard J. Anobile, President MTCC 597, Paul Reuber Incorporated (CC.Supp.GM23.6.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39083.pdf
(July 10, 2013) E-mail from Paul Reuber, Architect, Bruno Leps, President MTCC 628, and Richard J. Anobile, President MTCC 597, Paul Reuber Incorporated (CC.New.GM23.6.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39162.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Petition from Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, containing the names of approximately 2,361 persons and an on-line petition containing approximately 860 names headed "Keep the St. Lawrence Market North Market Redevelopment Project on Track" (CC.New.GM23.6.7)

GM23.7 - 2012 Final Report on Property Sales and Acquisitions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the reports (February 4, 2013 and June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer for information.

Origin

(February 4, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This final report provides information regarding total property sales and purchases by the City from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2012.

 

The report includes the number of properties proposed for sale, the current status of such properties, details regarding property acquisitions and expropriations and settlement costs. Also included is a breakdown of real estate transactions processed by delegated authority.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 4, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on 2012 Final Report on Property Sales and Acquisitions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-56449.pdf
(February 4, 2013) Appendix A - Surplus List
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-56450.pdf
(February 4, 2013) Appendix B - Property Acquisitions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-56451.pdf
(February 4, 2013) Appendix C - Properties Authorized for Sale and for Transfer to Build Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-56452.pdf

7a - Supplementary Report - 2012 Final Report on Property Sales and Acquisitions

Origin
(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer
Summary

This report provides an update with respect to the Declared Surplus List since the February 25, 2013 Government Management Committee meeting.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 3, 2013) Supplementary Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on 2012 Final Report on Property Sales and Acquisitions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59101.pdf

GM23.8 - Transfer of Properties to Build Toronto - Second Quarter 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
13 - Parkdale-High Park, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to enter into an agreement to transfer a stratified portion of the property municipally known as part of 2000 and 2002 Lake Shore Boulevard West more particularly described in Appendix 2 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, including any agreements related thereto, to Build Toronto, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendices 1 and 2 of the report (June 3, 2013) from Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to enter into an agreement to transfer a stratified portion of the property municipally known as 5131 Sheppard Avenue East more particularly described in Appendix 3 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, including any agreements related thereto, to Build Toronto, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendices 1 and 3 of the report (June 3, 2013) from Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council direct that the authority granted in Recommendations 1and 2 be subject to compliance with Section 12 of Ontario Regulation 609/06.

 

4.         City Council grant authority to the Chief Corporate Officer to permit Build Toronto to engage in licensing and leasing activities in respect of the properties in this report that are or become the subject matter of executed transfer agreements, during the period prior to the closing of the transfer transactions, on terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

5.         City Council grant authority to fund the City’s outstanding expenses related to the properties in this report from the Approved Operating Budget for Facilities Management and Real Estate (FM&RE), in the year(s) that the expenses are incurred, as necessary, and, once these expenses are known, to transfer the funding for these expenses from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF), with appropriate adjustments to FM&RE’s Approved Operating Budget, as necessary, through subsequent Quarterly Variance Reports.

 

6.         City Council direct the appropriate City staff to make the requisite budget adjustments for any budgetary impacts arising from the transfer of properties to Build Toronto to be effective at the earliest opportunity following the date of transfer to Build Toronto.

 

7.         City Council approve, as the approving authority under the provisions of the Expropriations Act, the transfer to Build Toronto of any property in this report that was acquired by expropriation without giving the original owner from whom the property was expropriated the first chance to repurchase the property.

 

8.         City Council authorize severally each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services to execute the transaction documents required to implement the Recommendations in this report on behalf of the City, including the execution of any required consents, approvals or permissions.

 

9.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions provided for in this report on behalf of the City, including making payment of any necessary expenses, amending the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), and amending or waiving the terms and conditions, as she may from time to time consider reasonable.

 

10.       City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to introduce in Council any Bills necessary to give effect to the foregoing.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report recommends the terms of transfer to Build Toronto of two properties previously declared surplus:  Part of 2000 and 2002 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 5131 Sheppard Avenue East.

 

By its adoption of GM20.6 on April 3 and 4, 2013, Council endorsed the enhanced process for property transfers to Build Toronto to augment the declare surplus and disposal process by, among other things, inclusion of City Planning on staff teams considering property transfers and earlier and ongoing communication between real estate and the local councillor, planning and Build Toronto.  This process has been implemented with respect to the properties in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Transfer of Properties to Build Toronto - Second Quarter 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59089.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix 1 - Terms and Conditions for All Transfer Agreements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59090.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix 2 - Part of 2000 and 2002 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59091.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix 3 - 5131 Sheppard Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59092.pdf

GM23.9 - Transfer of 497 Richmond Street West to Build Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to enter into an agreement to transfer a stratified portion of the property municipally known as 497 Richmond Street West more particularly described in Appendix 2 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, including any agreements related thereto, to Build Toronto, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendices 1 and 2 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to enter into a lease agreement with Eva's Initiatives for Homeless Youth (Eva's), for a portion of the Property referred to as 60 Brant Street being approximately 1,500 m2 (16,151 ft2) in lot area, substantially on terms and conditions outlined in Appendix 3 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council grant authority to enter into a Relocation Agreement with Build Toronto, Whitecastle New Urban Fund, L. P. and Build Toronto Holdings (Ordnance) Inc. and Eva's regarding the arrangements for relocating Eva's and renovating the 60 Brant Street portion, substantially on terms and conditions outlined in Appendix 4 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council authorize the  City to enter into a Reciprocal Agreement with Build Toronto for the joint use of the identified portions of the Property, substantially on terms and conditions outlined in Appendix 5 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

5.         City Council direct that the authority granted in Recommendations 1 be subject to compliance with Section 12 of Ontario Regulation 609/06.

 

6.         City Council grant authority to the Chief Corporate Officer to permit Build Toronto to engage in licensing and leasing activities in respect of the Property that is or becomes the subject matter of an executed transfer agreement, during the period prior to the closing of the transfer transaction, on terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

7.         City Council grant authority to fund the City’s outstanding expenses related to the Property from the Approved Operating Budget for Facilities Management and Real Estate (FM&RE), in the year(s) that the expenses are incurred, as necessary, and, once these expenses are known, to transfer the funding for these expenses from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF), with appropriate adjustments to FM&RE’s Approved Operating Budget, as necessary, through subsequent Quarterly Variance Reports.

 

8.         City Council direct the appropriate City staff to make the requisite budget adjustments for any budgetary impacts arising from the transfer of this property to Build Toronto, to be effective at the earliest opportunity following the date of transfer to Build Toronto.

 

9.         City Council authorize severally each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services to execute the transaction documents and agreements required to implement the Recommendations in this report on behalf of the City, including the execution of any required consents, approvals or permissions.

 

10.       City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions provided for in this report on behalf of the City, including making payment of any necessary expenses, amending the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), and amending or waiving the terms and conditions, as she may from time to time consider reasonable.

 

11.       City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to introduce in Council any Bills necessary to give effect to the foregoing.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report recommends the terms of transfer to Build Toronto of 497 Richmond Street West (shown as Part 1 on Sketch PS – 2011-099, "the Property") which was declared surplus for this purpose by City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011.  The Property is developed with buildings around its perimeter and an interior courtyard and has a number of convenience addresses: 505 and 511 Richmond Street West, 60 Brant Street and 17 Maud Street. 

 

The Property is being reported on independently due to the complexities associated with its transfer and the timing of the relocation of Eva's Initiatives for Homeless Youth from 11 and 25 Ordnance Street to the 60 Brant Street portion of the Property (also known as Building D), as provided for in GM9.10a approved by City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Transfer of 497 Richmond Street West to Build Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59076.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix 1 - Terms and Conditions for Transfer Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59077.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix 2 - 497 Richmond Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59078.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix 3 - Lease Agreement Synopsis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59079.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix 4 - Relocation Agreement Synopsis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59080.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix 5 - Reciprocal Agreement Synopsis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59087.pdf

GM23.10 - Amendment to Purchase Order No. 6024178 - For Architectural and Related Design Services and Contract Administration Services to Implement the Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization Project

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6024178 with Plant Architect Inc. and Shore Tilbe Irwin & Partners in Joint Venture, for the architectural and related design services and contract administration services for the implementation of the Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization Project, including State of Good Repair (SOGR) elements at Toronto City Hall by:

 

a.         changing the name on the Purchase Order to Plant Architect Inc. and Perkins + Will Canada Corporation in Joint Venture; and

 

b.         increasing the Purchase Order value by $898,185.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($913,993.06 net of HST recoveries), revising the current contract value from $4,297,815.00 ($4,373,456.54 net of HST recoveries) to $5,196,000.00 ($5,287,449.60 net of HST recoveries) net of all applicable taxes and charges.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City to enter into an amending agreement with Plant Architect Inc. and Perkins + Will Canada Corporation in Joint Venture related to the expanded role of the architect for the future Restaurant Project at an upset cost of $35,000.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges (which is included in the increase to the Purchase Order as set out in 1b of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division), and also to obtain from Plant Architect Inc. and Perkins + Will Canada Corporation in Joint Venture a waiver of the moral rights to the NPSR design related to the future Restaurant Project, on terms satisfactory to the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

This report requests authority to amend Purchase Order No. 6024178 with Plant Architect Inc. and Shore Tilbe Irwin & Partners in Joint Venture, for Architectural and Related Design Services and Contract Administration Services for the implementation of the Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization (NPSR) project at Toronto City Hall by:

 

           changing the name on the Purchase Order to Plant Architect Inc. and Perkins + Will Canada Corporation in Joint Venture (the Architects); and

           increasing the Purchase Order by $898,185.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($913,993.06 net of HST recoveries) revising the current contract value from $4,297,815.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($4,373,456.54 net of HST recoveries) to $5,196,000.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($5,287,449.60 net of HST recoveries).

 

The report also recommends that the City enter into an amending agreement to include an additional scope of work for the future Restaurant Project at an upset limit of $35,000.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges (included in the above-noted amount of $898,185.00) and to obtain a waiver for the design of the future Restaurant Project.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Amendment to Purchase Order No. 6024178 - For Architectural and Related Design Services and Contract Administration Services to Implement the Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59093.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Shelley Carroll

GM23.11 - Award - RFP 0613-13-0067 for the Design, Build, Finance and Operation of a New Restaurant and/or Banquet Centre and Other Complementary Facilities at the Guild Inn Site

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
43 - Scarborough East

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority for the Chief Corporate Officer or her designate (CCO), in consultation with the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, to negotiate the terms and conditions of an agreement with Dynamic Hospitality & Entertainment Group, being the only proponent meeting the requirements of RFP No. 0613-13-0067 to design, build, finance and operate a new restaurant and banquet/event centre and other complementary facilities at the Guild Inn site and to report back to City Council on the results of the negotiations.

 

2.         City Council authorize the public release of the information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, following execution of an agreement with Dynamic Hospitality & Entertainment Group.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide information on the results of the Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 0613-13-0067 for the selection of a qualified and experienced food service developer/operator to design, build, finance and operate a new restaurant and banquet/event centre and other complementary facilities at the Guild Inn site.  This report requests authority to undertake the negotiations for a long-term agreement with the recommended proponent, Dynamic Hospitality & Entertainment Group (referred to in this report as "Dynamic"), being the only qualified proponent meeting the requirements of the widely-distributed RFP.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, on Award - RFP 0613-13-0067 for the Design, Build, Finance and Operation of a New Restaurant and/or Banquet Centre and Other Complementary Facilities at the Guild Inn Site
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59120.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 - Award - RFP 0613-13-0067 for the Design, Build, Finance and Operation of a New Restaurant and/or Banquet Centre and Other Complementary Facilities at the Guild Inn Site

GM23.12 - Pedestrian Tunnel Agreement - Park Home Avenue (North York Civic Centre and Gibson Square)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to negotiate and enter into a pedestrian tunnel licence agreement (the "Agreement") with Menkes Gibson Square Inc. ("Menkes"), for the purpose of constructing, maintaining, repairing and operating an underground pedestrian tunnel substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix "A" of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Transportation Services, and on such further terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer or her designate, to administer and manage the Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and consent to assignments provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

This report requests authority to enter into a pedestrian tunnel agreement with Menkes Gibson Square Inc. for an underground pedestrian tunnel connection to be constructed, maintained, repaired and operated by Menkes for a pedestrian route under Park Home Avenue to connect the Menkes Gibson Square development with the North York City Centre Mall.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Pedestrian Tunnel Agreement - Park Home Avenue (North York Civic Centre and Gibson Square)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59122.pdf

GM23.13 - Below-Market Rent Agreements at 3401 Dufferin Street and at 2975 Don Mills Road West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 33 - Don Valley East

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the renewal of the BMR sub-lease agreement with Art Starts Neighbourhood Cultural Centre, for a ten (10) year term, based on the terms and conditions of the existing lease, and the terms as set out in Appendix "A" of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and on such other terms and conditions acceptable to Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Social Development, Finance and Administration Division (SDFA) to receive funds on behalf of the City of Toronto from Oxford Properties Group (management company for Yorkdale Shopping Centre) amounting to $520,000 in instalments of $52,000 per year over ten years, and for SDFA to disburse this funding to Art Starts Neighbourhood Cultural Centre for youth arts initiatives.

 

3.         City Council increase the 2013 Approved Operating Budget for SDFA by $52,000 gross/ $0 net, with funding provided by Oxford Properties Group, to provide funding to Art Starts Neighbourhood Cultural Centre for youth arts initiatives.

 

4.         City Council authorize an amendment to the existing Below-Market Rent (BMR) lease agreement with North York Harvest Food Bank to add approximately 117 square feet of additional space on the first floor of the building located on the property known municipally as 2975 Don Mills Road West, substantially based on the terms set out in the attached Appendix "B" of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, with such revisions thereto and such other terms and conditions deemed appropriate  by the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

5.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer, or her designate, to administer and manage the agreements indentified in Recommendations 1 and 4 of the report (June 3, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the agreements, deliver any notices, pay expenses and amend the commencement and other dates to such earlier or late date(s), on such terms and conditions, as she may, from time to time, determine.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council authority for the renewal of a sublease agreement with Art Starts Neighbourhood Cultural Centre (Art Starts) at 3401 Dufferin Street (Lower level of Yorkdale Shopping Centre) under the City's Below Market Rent (BMR) policy, and to amend an existing BMR lease to include an additional 117 square feet of space with North York Harvest Food Bank at 2975 Don Mills Road West.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, on Below-Market Rent Agreements at 3401 Dufferin Street and at 2975 Don Mills Road West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59096.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix A - Major Terms and Conditions for Art Starts - 3401 Dufferin Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59097.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix B - Location Map for 3401 Dufferin Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59098.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix C - Major Terms and Conditions for North York Harvest Food Bank - 2975 Don Mills Road West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59099.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Appendix D - Location Map for 2975 Don Mills Road West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59100.pdf

GM23.15 - Provision of Proprietary Software Support and Maintenance Services from INNOVYZE Inc. for Sewer Modelling and Asset Management

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Chief Information Officer to negotiate and execute a contract with INNOVYZE Inc., subject to approval of Toronto Water's annual Operating Budget in each calendar year, for  the provision of maintenance and support services for  InfoWorks and InfoNet software licenses from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015 in the amount of $161,294.10 USD net of HST (or $164,132.88 USD net of HST recoveries), on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Information Officer, Information & Technology, and the General Manager, Toronto Water, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Information Officer, Information and Technology, the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

This report seeks authority to renew the information technology proprietary support and maintenance contract for InfoWorks and InfoNet software products licensed from INNOVYZE Inc. for a three (3) year period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015 in the amount not to exceed $164,132.88 USD, net of HST recoveries.

 

The previous purchases have exceeded the five (5) year commitment limit under section 1 of the Municipal Code Chapter 195-Purchasing (the Purchasing By-Law), Section 1; and a contract renewal is therefore being requested.

 

INNOVYZE Inc. is the sole provider of the InfoWorks and InfoNet software used by the City for computer simulation hydraulic modelling and sewer asset management, respectively.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Information Officer, Information and Technology, the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Provision of Proprietary Software Support and Maintenance Services from INNOVYZE Inc. for Sewer Modelling and Asset Management
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59131.pdf

GM23.20 - Aurostar Inc. - Disqualification from City Contracts, Fair Wage Policy Non-Compliance

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, as a result of Aurostar Inc. having been found to be in non-compliance with the provisions of the Fair Wage Policy on at least two separate instances over a period of three years inclusive, grant authority for the Manager, Fair Wage Office, to disqualify Aurostar Inc. from conducting business with the City for a period of two years inclusive.

 

2.         Despite the provisions of  Municipal Code, Chapter 67, Fair Wage, Subsection 67-A10B, City Council direct that Aurostar Inc. be permitted to complete its current contracts with the City in accordance with their terms, and the two-year disqualification period under Subsection 67-A10B  shall start from the day of the decision of Council with respect to any City work that Aurostar Inc. is not currently under contract to perform, and that:

 

a.         once the disqualification period is over, Aurostar Inc. be placed on probation for the next year; and

 

b.         Aurostar Inc.'s status as a disqualified firm be published on the City's Web Site.

 

3.         City Council direct that the Manager, Fair Wage Office, continue to closely monitor Aurostar Inc.'s current City contracts until that work is completed in 2013.

 

4.         City Council direct that the confidential information, contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 3, 2013) from the Manager, Fair Wage Office, remain confidential since it relates to security of the property of the City.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Manager, Fair Wage Office

Summary

The provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 67, Fair Wage require the Manager, Fair Wage Office to report to Government Management Committee on proposed disqualification action when a contractor or any subcontractor is found to be in non-compliance with the provisions of the Fair Wage Policy in two separate instances over a period of three years.

 

This report recommends disqualification of Aurostar Inc. ("Aurostar") from conducting business with the City for a period of two years for failure to pay its workers earned, unpaid wages when due, resulting in several instances of  Fair Wage Policy non-compliance on City contracts over the past three years.

 

The attachment to this report should remain confidential as it relates to security of the property of the City.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Manager, Fair Wage Office, on Aurostar Inc. - Disqualification from City Contracts, Fair Wage Policy Non-Compliance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-59377.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 - Aurostar Inc. Contract Performance

Speakers

Stephen Bromell, Secretary Treasurer (Organizing Division), The Building Union of Canada
Peter Foulds, Director of Operations, The Building Union of Canada
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 21

PE21.1 - Official Recognition of Friends of Morningside Park

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council support the official recognition of Friends of Morningside Park.

 

2.         City Council recognize Morningside Park Resource Group (MPRG) for their long standing commitment and work to enhance the Morningside Park experience.

Origin

(May 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ainslie, Scarborough East Ward 43

Summary

Letter from Councillor Paul Ainslie requesting official recognition of Friends of Morningside Park.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ainslie, Scarborough East Ward 43 - Official Recognition of Friends of Morningside Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-58426.pdf

PE21.2 - Official Recognition of Friends of Brooks Road Park

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council support the official recognition of Friends of Brooks Road Park.

Origin

(May 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ainslie, Scarborough East Ward 43

Summary

Letter from Councillor Ainslie requesting official recognition of Friends of Brooks Road Park.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ainslie, Scarborough East Ward 43 - Official Recognition of Friends of Brooks Road Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-58428.pdf

PE21.6 - Vehicle Parking in Marilyn Bell Park

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Commtitee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, effective immediately, end the CNE's use of Marilyn Bell Park for temporary permitted parking.

Origin

(June 10, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report seeks Council approval to end the practice of allowing vehicle parking in Marilyn Bell Park during the 18-day annual event at Canadian National Exhibition (CNE). In 2000, Toronto City Council approved the use of Marilyn Bell Park and Battery Park for temporary parking in exchange for a contribution from the CNE to the Parkland Acquisition Reserve Fund. The park has since undergone substantial improvements, which include tree planting and the relocation of the Martin Goodman Trail. In May 2012, Parks, Forestry and Recreation notified the CNE of its intention to end the practice of allowing vehicle parking in Marilyn Bell Park, starting in 2013. This intention is consistent with the Division's approach to confining vehicle parking in all parks to designated parking lots.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation - Vehicle Parking in Marilyn Bell Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-59450.pdf

Speakers

David Bednar, General Manager, Canadian National Exhibition
Councillor Doug Holyday, Ward 3, Etobicoke Centre

Communications (Committee)

(June 21, 2013) Letter from David Bednar, Canadian National Exhibition (PE.Main.21.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/comm/communicationfile-38615.pdf

PE21.7 - Naming Rights Agreement with Mr. William Meany for the Creation of a New Toronto Island Hedge Maze

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into a construction agreement with Mr. William Meany for the construction of a new hedge maze in Toronto Island Park, in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to negotiate and enter into a naming rights agreement with Mr. William Meany in compliance with the Corporate and Individual Naming Rights policy for a term of not more than ten years or the useful life of the hedge maze, whichever is earlier, with renewal rights at the City's option, in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 14, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek approval from City Council to enter into a naming rights agreement and a construction agreement with a private citizen, Mr. William Meany, for the rebuilding and naming of a hedge maze located at Toronto Island Park, in accordance with the terms and conditions described in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 14, 2013) Report from the Jim Hart, General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division - Naming Rights Agreement with Mr. William Meany for the Creation of a New Toronto Island Hedge Maze
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-59613.pdf

PE21.9 - Cycling Safety in Tommy Thompson Park

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PE21.9.2 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve interim modifications to the ten speed bumps installed in 2011 to make the incline and decline grade more gradual and ensure greater accessibility of this portion of the trail at an estimated cost of $8,400 which can be accommodated in the 2013 Parks, Forestry and Recreation Operating Budget.

 

2.         City Council direct the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority and Parks, Forestry and Recreation to work with the City's Cycling and Infrastructure Program to hold a public forum in 2013 to help generate longer-term solutions to reduce cycling speeds, ensure greater trail enjoyment by diverse users and protect the sensitive local ecology.

 

3.         City Council direct the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report through future operating or capital budget processes on any net budget impacts resulting from initiatives recommended through the public forum in 2013.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report responds to a request made at the March 4, 2013, Parks and Environment Committee to Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority on safety concerns raised by residents concerning ten speed bumps installed along 2.5 km of multi-use trail in Tommy Thompson Park in November 2011.

 

Given the unique ecological character of Tommy Thompson Park and the diversity of users who frequent its trails, it is essential to maintain appropriate controls for the reduction of cycling speed.  This report recommends a two-fold approach to address safety and accessibility concerns of the speed bumps.  The approach includes an interim modification of the bumps and a public forum to generate longer-term solutions.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - Cycling Safety in Tommy Thompson Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-59279.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Neil McDermott, Captain Ward 21 Advocacy Group, Cycle Toronto (PE.New.21.9.1)

Communications (City Council)

(June 24, 2013) E-mail from Michael Black (CC.Main.PE21.9.2)

Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 25

PG25.1 - Technical Amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1111 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the zoning by-law amendment substantially in accordance with Attachment 1 of the report (May 29, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Zoning By-law amendment as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.         Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to examine the zoning for 1033 College Street in the new Zoning By-law as to whether it should be CR-commercial-residential, as are the adjoining properties along College Street.

 

2.         Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to examine the zoning for 2522 Keele Street in the new Zoning By-law as to whether it should be added to the list of properties exempted by way of the Transition Protocol.

 

3.         Referred the public presentations from Barry Morrison and Isaiah Banach to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning for consideration and report directly to Council, if necessary. 

 

The Planning and Growth Management Committee held a statutory public meeting on June 20, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. 

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

As part of the process of enacting the new City-wide Zoning By-law, the Transition Protocol was established with criteria to determine which properties would be left out of new Zoning By-law. One category in the Protocol refers to sites subject to complete applications for a zoning by-law amendment. Another involves lands subject to complete applications for site plan approval. Due to the time required to produce the Zoning By-law Map for the May 7-10, 2013 meeting of City Council, staff were unable to remove sites that had submitted complete applications just prior to the City-wide Zoning By-law enactment on May 9, 2013. 

 

This report proposes technical amendments to remove lands from Zoning By-law 569-2013 that were subject to complete applications and met the Transition Protocol criteria, but were not removed prior to Council enactment. In addition, the correction of a small number of minor typographical errors is recommended through this amending by-law.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 29, 2013) Report with Attachments 1-3, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Technical Amendments to By-law 569-2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59332.pdf
(May 31, 2013) Notice of Public Meeting on the Proposed amendments to Zoning By-law for the City of Toronto No. 569-2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59396.pdf

Speakers

Barry Morrison, Parklawn Co. Inc.
Isaiah Banach, Lawyer, Davies Howe Partners LLP

Communications (Committee)

(June 17, 2013) Letter from Robert G. Doumani, Aird & Berlis LLP (PG.New.PG25.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38365.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Kathy Pandell, Pal Properties Limited (PG.New.PG25.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38583.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners, LLP (PG.New.PG25.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38592.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Susan Rosenthal, Davies Howe Partners LLP (PG.New.PG25.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38593.pdf

PG25.2 - Eglinton Planning Study Status Report No. 2

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 25 - Don Valley West, 26 - Don Valley West, 34 - Don Valley East, 35 - Scarborough Southwest, 37 - Scarborough Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to share with Metrolinx the work done by City staff on  the environmental and streetscaping benefits of a "planted/green trackway" for the at-grade section of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT, which runs from Leslie Street to Kennedy Station and to work with Metrolinx to overcome any obstacles to inclusion of a "green trackway" in the plans for the LRT.

 

2.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in conjunction with local councillors, BIAs and Metrolinx to explore co-ordinating Economic Development, Public Space and intensification opportunities for the Dufferin and Eglinton node.

 

3.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with appropriate officials, to explore mandatory minimums on all sites  to ensure a healthy mix of commercial, retail and residential uses, including strategies and policies to ensure affordable housing is also achieved. 

 

4.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on September 12, 2013 on the desirability and feasibility of an Amendment to the Official Plan to require future higher order transit stations throughout the City of Toronto to be integrated into Mixed Use or Commercial developments as appropriate to the Land Use Designation of Transit Stations sites under the Official Plan.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Program Manager, Eglinton Planning Study and the Director, Urban Design, City Planning made a presentation to the Committee.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The purpose of this report is to update the members of Planning and Growth Management Committee (PGMC) and the public on the status of the Eglinton Planning Study (Eglinton Connects).  The Study covers the 19 kilometres of Eglinton Avenue between Jane Street and Kennedy Road that will undergo significant transformation over the next decades, due in large part to the implementation of the Eglinton Crosstown Light Rail Transit project (LRT).

 

Eglinton Connects is a comprehensive study that incorporates the following:

 

-           An Avenue study, including a vision for Eglinton Avenue that will guide decisions about private development and public investment.  The Study identifies

-           options for reallocating space between different modes of transportation,

-           potential for intensified development in the form of mid-rise buildings,

-           locations that could support higher density development,

-           heritage resources and strategies for protection of these resources

            -           a public realm and streetscape plan.

 

-           A Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) that will make recommendations regarding the  reconfiguration of the right-of-way along the portion of Eglinton Avenue where the Eglinton Crosstown LRT is underground (Black Creek Drive to Brentcliffe Road); and

 

-           Site Plan review of the LRT stations and at-grade section as submitted by Metrolinx.

 

The background analysis has been largely completed and planning directions have been identified.  To date, three of the four rounds of public consultation have been completed.  The Final Report with recommendations for implementation will be presented to City Council in the first quarter of 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report with Attachments 1-3, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Eglinton Planning Study Status Report No. 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59331.pdf
(June 20, 2013) Presentation from City Planning Division on Eglinton Connects, City of Toronto Planning Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59786.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Cesar Palacio
Councillor John Parker
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Josh Matlow

Communications (Committee)

(June 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor John Parker (PG.New.PG25.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38591.pdf

PG25.3 - Site-Specific Sign By-law Amendment - 2 Strachan Avenue - Phase 2

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1144 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area-Specific Amendments, Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, to add an area-specific amendment to modify the display of one third party ground sign at the premises municipally known as 2 Strachan Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft by-law set out in Attachment 2 to the report (January 4, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft bills as may be required.

 

3.         City Council receive the report (May 31, 2013) from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place for information.

 

4.         City Council direct that the confidential report contained in Attachment 1 to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place remain confidential in its entirety and not be released publicly in order to protect the competitive position, future economic and legal interests of the Board.

Origin

(February 21, 2013) Report from City Council

Summary

City Council on February 20 and 21, 2013, considered Item PG20.5, “Site-Specific Sign By-law Amendment - 2 Strachan Avenue - Phase 2” and referred the Item back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee for further consideration.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 21, 2013) Referral from City Council on Site-Specific Sign By-law Amendment - 2 Strachan Avenue - Phase 2 (Item PG20.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59388.htm
(January 4, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Site-Specific Sign By-law Amendment - 2 Strachan Avenue - Phase 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59384.pdf
(January 4, 2013) Attachment 1 - Applicant's Submission Package
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59385.pdf
(January 4, 2013) Attachment 2 - Draft By-law - Site Specific Amendment for the Premises Municipally Known as 2 Strachan Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59386.pdf
(January 21, 2013) Public Notice - Site-Specific Sign By-law Amendment - 2 Strachan Avenue - Phase 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59387.pdf

Speakers

(April 11, 2013) Allan Herman
(April 11, 2013) Glenn McMichael, Clarity Outdoor
(April 11, 2013) Councillor Mike Layton
(June 20, 2013) William Moore, Counsel, Clarity Outdoor Media Inc. (Submission Filed)
(June 20, 2013) Allan Herman, Counsel, Clarity Outdoor Media Inc.
(June 20, 2013) Councillor Mike Layton
(June 20, 2013) Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(April 8, 2013) Letter from Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place (PG.Main.PG25.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-37837.pdf
(April 10, 2013) E-mail from William Moore (PG.Main.PG25.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-37836.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from William Moore and Glenn McMichael, Directors, Clarity Outdoor Media Inc. (PG.New.PG25.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38598.pdf

3a - 2 Strachan Avenue Sign - Agreement with Clarity Outdoor Media Inc. (“Clarity”)

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board
Origin
(May 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place
Summary

This report outlines in detail the background with respect to the billboard sign located at 2 Strachan Avenue, the agreement between Clarity and the Board, and related amendments to the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 694 Signs, General.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 31, 2013) Report with Appendices A and B, from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place on 2 Strachan Avenue Sign - Agreement with Clarity Outdoor Media Inc. (“Clarity”)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59391.pdf
(May 31, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 and Appendix "C" - Confidential Documents related to the Clarity Sign and Agreement

PG25.6 - Official Plan/Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Preliminary Assessments of Additional Conversion Requests

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 8 - York West, 10 - York Centre, 11 - York South-Weston, 26 - Don Valley West, 34 - Don Valley East, 37 - Scarborough Centre, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         Notwithstanding the Preliminary Assessment of sites noted in Attachment 2 of the report (May 21, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to:

 

a.         Schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 564-580 Evans Avenue and 24 The East Mall during September 2013, together with the Chair of the Planning and Growth Management Committee and the Chair of Etobicoke York Community Council.

 

b.         Give notice of the community consultation meeting to landowners and residents in an area beyond 120 metres of the site as determined in consultation with the Chair of the Planning and Growth Management Committee and the Chair of Etobicoke York Community Council, and that all costs associated with the expanded notification area be borne by the applicant.

 

2.         Notwithstanding the Preliminary Assessment of sites noted in Attachment 2 of the report (May 21, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to conduct additional analysis on 956 Islington Avenue.

 

3.         City Council direct that the further analysis set out in Recommendation 2 consider, but not be limited to:

 

a.         Examining all properties with split Employment Areas and Mixed Use Areas designations which are located on the west side of Islington Avenue and which front onto Islington Avenue between Nordin Avenue to Six Point Road and review the appropriateness of extending the Mixed Use Area designation to the rear of these split designated properties.

 

b.         For sites deeper than 50 metres, identifying issues with respect to vehicular access and appropriate buffering to adjacent industry to the rear of the sites.

 

4.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to Planning and Growth Management Committee at its meeting on November 21, 2013 with the results of the analysis set out in Recommendation 2.

 

5.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to prepare final recommendations on all requests/applications for conversions of employment lands received prior to May 31, 2013 including those not reported out to date, with the exception of the properties set out in Recommendations 1 to 4 above, at the statutory special public meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

Origin

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report provides preliminary assessments on an additional 11 requests/applications for the conversion of employment lands for residential purposes.  Staffs’ preliminary assessments propose that 10 of the sites contained in this report be retained as employment areas and the remaining site falls within an area that staff previously identified as a potential Regeneration Area.

 

Five of the eleven requests/applications involve lands located within the Eglinton Connects (EC) Planning Study area being undertaken by City Planning in anticipation of the Eglinton-Scarborough Crosstown Light Rail Transit (LRT) project.  The preliminary assessments propose that the 5 sites be retained as an Employment Area.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 21, 2013) Report with Attachments 1 and 2, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Official Plan/Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Preliminary Assessments of Additional Conversion Requests
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59288.pdf

Speakers

Braden Smith, Bratty's LLP

Communications (Committee)

(June 4, 2013) E-mail from Phil Dyment, General Manager, Norampac - Lithotech (PG.New.PG25.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38603.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfields Inc. (PG.New.PG25.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38577.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfields Inc. (PG.New.PG25.6.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38580.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Barry A. Horosko, Bratty's LLP (PG.New.PG25.6.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38602.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from James M. Kennedy, KLM Planning Partners Inc. (PG.New.PG25.6.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38613.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from David Charezenko, Dillon Consulting (PG.New.PG25.6.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38594.pdf

PG25.8 - Protecting and Increasing Access to Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space (POPS) - Status Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to research all Privately Owned Public Space in the City of Toronto and prepare a report listing the locations of all existing Privately Owned Public Space, which warrant signage and develop a strategy for contacting property owners of existing Privately Owned Public Space so that these spaces be appropriately signed as being publically accessible and report back in the second quarter of 2014.

 

2.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Legal Services Division to develop appropriate wording for signs located on Privately Owned Public Space and report back in the second quarter of 2014.

 

3.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to develop design guidelines for the creation of new Privately Owned Public Space in consultation with appropriate stakeholders and report back in the second quarter of 2014.

Origin

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an update on City Planning work in response to Council's direction to examine Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space (POPS).

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Protection and Increasing Access to Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Open Space (POPS) - Status
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59381.pdf

PG25.10 - Toronto Green Standard Review and Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PG25.10.12 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the Toronto Green Standard Minimum Energy Performance standards for Mid-to-High Rise Residential and Non Residential be revised as follows:

 

a.         Tier One (GHG 1.1): Design the building(s) to exceed the energy efficiency requirements of the current Ontario Building Code by 15%;

 

b.         Tier Two (GHG 1.3): Design and construct the building(s) to achieve at least 25% energy efficiency improvement over the current Ontario Building Code.

 

2.         City Council adopt the revised Toronto Green Standard Tier 1 and Tier 2 performance measures as presented in Appendix A of the report (May 23, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning: Mid-High Rise Residential and Non Residential; and Appendix B of the report (May 23, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning: Low Rise Residential, as amended by Recommendation 1 above, to be applied to new development applications under the Planning Act commencing January 1, 2014, subject to any necessary Official Plan and City-wide Site Plan Control By-law amendments,

 

3.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Corporate Officer, to develop a comprehensive planning approach to address sustainable energy issues posed by development and report back to City Council with recommendations in 2014, taking into account:

 

a.         the results of the report on energy and electricity needs associated with growth requested by Council;

 

b.         the Toronto Regional Electricity Plan being prepared by Ontario Power Authority and Toronto Hydro;

 

c.         the results of further consultation with the Chief Building Official and Executive Director Toronto Building and stakeholders on increasing sustainable energy targets for new development;

 

d.         the Council-approved community-wide GHG reduction targets for 2020 and 2050;

e.          global best practices in energy efficiency standards for buildings, including the use of Energy Use Intensity-based targets.

 

4.         City Council direct that City Agencies, Corporations and Divisions apply Tier 1 of the Toronto Green Standard,  as amended, as the minimum standard to all capital projects and Tier 2, as amended, at their discretion in requests for proposals effective immediately.

 

5.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Corporate Officer to jointly undertake a cost benefit analysis of the application of Tier 2 of the Toronto Green Standard, as amended,  to all capital projects undertaken by the City's Agencies, Corporations and Divisions and report back on the findings and recommendations in 2014.

 

6.         City Council direct that, where technically and financially practical, all new facilities owned by the City's Agencies, Corporations and Divisions with a gross floor area greater than 600m2 install on-site renewable energy devices to generate the equivalent of at least 5 percent of the building's modelled annual energy consumption effective immediately upon the adoption of the report ((May 23, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Origin

(May 23, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report encompasses the results of a comprehensive technical review and update of the Toronto Green Standard (TGS) adopted by City Council in December 2009. The TGS is a two-tier set of environmental performance measures that facilitates sustainable new development in Toronto. The revised and updated (TGS) reflects improvements resulting from direct experiences in applying the Green Standard to new development and the incorporation of new City guidelines, policy or regulations that came into effect since implementation began in 2010. Representatives of City Divisions and development industry stakeholders have participated in the review of each section of the (TGS).

 

Highlights of the new version of the TGS include:

 

-           Improved Tier 1 performance measures to address implementation challenges

 

-           Consistency with the City-wide Zoning By-law and the City-wide Site Plan Control By-law.

 

-           Incorporation of new performance measures supporting the latest City guideline documents.

 

-           Expanded Tier 2 voluntary package, aligned with LEED® Canada for New Construction and Waterfront Toronto's Mandatory Green Building Requirements.

 

It is recommended that the proposed, updated TGS be adopted and implemented for all new development applications commencing January 1, 2014.  Further reports on sustainable energy targets for new development and on the feasibility of applying a Tier 2 policy for new City-owned facilities in 2014 are recommended. The next review to the TGS will commence in 2017.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 23, 2013) Report with Attachments 1 and 2, from the Chief Planner and Executive, City Planning Division on the Toronto Green Standard Review and Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59341.pdf

Speakers

Danny Harvey, Department of Geography, University of Toronto
Bryan Purcell, Toronto Atmospheric Fund
Murray Johnson, Director, Canadian Condominium Institute – Toronto & Area Chapter
Kim Pressnail, Professor, University of Toronto, Department of Civil Engineering

Communications (Committee)

(June 14, 2013) Letter from K.D. Pressnail, Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto and M.F. Touchie, Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto (PG.New.PG25.10.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38362.pdf
(June 14, 2013) Letter from Julia Langer, Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Atmospheric Fund (PG.New.PG25.10.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38334.pdf
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Murray Johnson, Director, Canadian Condominium Institute, Toronto Area Chapter (PG.New.PG25.10.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38425.pdf
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Matthew MacLean (PG.New.PG25.10.4)
(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Graham Fowler (PG.New.PG25.10.5)
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Danny Harvey, Department of Geography, University of Toronto (PG.New.PG25.10.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38551.pdf
(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Robert Shirkey, Executive Director, Our Horizon (PG.New.PG25.10.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38575.pdf
(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Stuart Basden (PG.New.PG25.10.8)
(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Benjamin Kai (PG.New.PG25.10.9)
(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Jon Yazer (PG.New.PG25.10.10)
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Mara Samardzic, Planner, Policy & Government Relations, Building Industry and Land Development Association (PG.New.PG25.10.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38597.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 15, 2013) Letter from Mara Samardzic, Planner, Policy and Government Relations, Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) (CC.New.PG25.10.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39098.pdf

PG25.11 - Area-Specific Sign By-law Amendment for 378 Yonge Street (Elephant & Castle)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve an amendment to Chapter 694, Signs, General, to adopt an area-specific amendment at 378 Yonge Street, substantially in accordance with the administrative design features as set out in Appendix A to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft bills as may be required.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building

Summary

This report recommends approval of an application to amend the current Sign By-law to implement a site-specific amendment located at 378 Yonge Street.  The application is the subject of a related report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, to the Toronto Preservation Board and to this Standing Committee with respect to the heritage issues related to this proposal.

 

The application describes a proposal to erect a third party sign on the roof of the existing heritage designated building. The proposed roof sign would contain three faces, directed north, east and south, with each face displaying electronic static copy and accented with colour changing LED light columns at three corners, and a colour changing LED "spire" element. 

 

The application is supported by the document entitled "Bright Lights – Big City: A Signage Vision for the Downtown Yonge Strip" (the "Signage Vision") and is in keeping with the image for the Downtown Yonge Street Special Sign District (DYS-SSD), as described by Chapter 694.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on the Area-Specific Sign By-law Amendment for 378 Yonge Street (Elephant & Castle)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59352.pdf
(May 28, 2013) Appendix A - Administrative Design for 378 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59781.pdf
(April 1, 2013) Appendix B - Yonge Gerrard Media Display; prepared by KDA Associates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59782.pdf
(June 11, 2013) Public Notice on Area-Specific Sign by-law Amendment for 378 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59394.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 19, 2013) Letter from Eileen P. Costello, Aird & Berlis (PG.New.PG25.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38621.pdf

PG25.12 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 378 Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the proposed signage application for the heritage property at 378 Yonge Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act substantially in accordance with the drawings submitted by Kramer Design Associates, dated April 1, 2013, and the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by E.R.A. Architects, dated May 9, 2013 on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         Prior to the issuance of a sign permit for roof-top signs on the heritage property located at 378 Yonge Street, including a permit for the demolition/removal of existing signs and erection of new signs, the owner shall provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

 

i.          sign permit construction drawings;

 

ii.         final signage plan, heritage interpretation plan and lighting plan for the exterior of the heritage building;

 

iii.        heritage conservation drawings and specifications for heritage conservation work to implement the conservation plan referenced in the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by E.R.A. Architects dated May 9, 2013, to be prepared by a qualified heritage consultant;

 

iv.        Letter of Credit, in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure all conservation work included in the Heritage Impact Assessment referenced above;

 

b.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:

 

i.          a notice of substantial completion for the heritage conservation work, signed by the Heritage Consultant;

 

ii.         implementation of the heritage interpretation plan and heritage lighting plan.

Origin

(May 10, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property located at 378 Yonge Street which consists of the addition of new large format signage construction on the roof.

 

The subject proposal has been prepared by Kramer Design Associates, dated April 1, 2013 and submitted as "Yonge and Gerrard Media Display".

 

The application to erect an assembly of three large third party signs is supported by the document entitled Bright Lights – Big City:  A Signage Vision for the Downtown Yonge Strip (Signage Vision), which provides guidelines for large format signage design along the section of Yonge Street south of Gerrard Street to Queen Street. While roof signs are generally prohibited under Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the Toronto Municipal Code and third party signs are prohibited on all heritage properties within the City, the subject property is located within the section of Yonge Street intended for special consideration, to be guided by the Signage Vision document.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 10, 2013) Report with Attachments 1-10, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 378 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59392.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 19, 2013) Letter from Eileen P. Costello, Aird & Berlis (PG.New.PG25.12.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-38622.pdf

12a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 378 Yonge Street

Origin
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2013 considered a report (May 10, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, respecting Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property – 378 Yonge Street.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 378 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59349.pdf

PG25.13 - Amendments to Chapter 694 of the Municipal Code, Signs, General

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PG25.13.1 has been submitted on this Item

Bill 1169 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         the following provisions be carried forward in any amendment to Section 694-30A of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Signs, General:

 

Is, in the opinion of the decision maker, not contrary to the public interest;

 

Is of a sign class or a sign type that is permitted in the sign district where the premises is located; and

 

Is not expressly prohibited by Section 694-15B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Signs, General.

 

2.         City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 694, Signs, General, to: modify provisions concerning criteria for variances; the application process for Signage Master Plans; certain definitions; and alter certain provisions establishing performance standards for signs, substantially in accordance with the draft by-law attached as Appendix 1 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, as amended by Recommendation 1.

 

3.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish each of the premises municipally known as 10 Park Lawn Road, 2139 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2143 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2147 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2147A Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2151 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2153 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2155 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2157 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2161 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2165 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2167 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2175 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2179 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2183 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 2200 Lake Shore Boulevard West as CR-Commercial Residential Sign Districts, and the premises municipally known as 2189 Lake Shore Boulevard West as an OS-Open Space Sign District by replacing Sign District Map Ward 6: Etobicoke-Lakeshore of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 2 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

4.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish the premises municipally known as 1060 Sheppard Avenue West as a CR-Commercial Residential Sign District by replacing Sign District Map Ward 8: York West of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 3 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

5.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish each of the premises municipally known as 2237 St Clair Avenue West and 2255 St Clair Avenue West as an E-Employment Sign District by replacing Sign District Map Ward 11: York South-Weston of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 4 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

6.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish each of the premises municipally known as 766 King Street West, 169 Fort York Boulevard, 209 Fort York Boulevard, 20 Bathurst Street, 600 Fleet Street, 612 Fleet Street, 620 Fleet Street, 640 Fleet Street, 650 Fleet Street, 38 Grand Magazine Street, 60 Grand Magazine Street, 65 Grand Magazine Street and 70 Iannuzzi Street as CR-Commercial Residential Sign Districts by replacing Sign District Map Ward 19: Trinity-Spadina of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 5 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

7.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish each of the premises municipally known as 142 Fort York Boulevard, 25 Lower Simcoe Street, 31 Lower Simcoe Street, 75 Lower Simcoe Street, 12 York Street, 14 York Street, 15 York Street, 16 York Street, and 18 York Street, as CR-Commercial Residential Sign Districts by replacing Sign District Map Ward 20: Trinity-Spadina of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 6 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

8.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish the premises municipally known as 660 Eglinton Avenue East as a C-Commercial Sign District by replacing Sign District Map Ward 26: Don Valley West of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 8 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

9.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish the premises municipally known as 136 Isabella Street as a C-Commercial Sign District by replacing Sign District Map Ward 27: Toronto Centre-Rosedale of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 9 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

10.       City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish each of the premises municipally known as 487 King Street East and 25 York Street as a C-Commercial Sign District by replacing Sign District Map Ward 28: Toronto Centre-Rosedale of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 10 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

11.       City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish each of the premises municipally known as 5813 Steeles Avenue East, 5833 Steeles Avenue East, 5839 Steeles Avenue East, 5853 Steeles Avenue East, 5863 Steeles Avenue East, 5871 Steeles Avenue East, 5881 Steeles Avenue East, 5891 Steeles Avenue East, 5901 Steeles Avenue East, 5933 Steeles Avenue East, 5945 Steeles Avenue East and 5951 Steeles Avenue East as C-Commercial Sign Districts by replacing Sign District Map Ward 41: Scarborough-Rouge River of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 11 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

12.       City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish each of the premises municipally known as 6714 Kingston Road, 6742 Kingston Road and 7331 Kingston Road as C-Commercial Sign Districts by replacing Sign District Map Ward 44: Scarborough East of Schedule A, Maps, with the map attached as Appendix 12 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.

 

13.       City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft bills as may be required.

Origin

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building

Summary

This report proposes a series of amendments to the Sign By-law ("Chapter 694") to streamline the decision-making process for sign applications. This streamlining is expected to reduce the wait time associated with a Signage Master Plan application by considering them as a sign variance. This report proposes requiring a Signage Master Plan where more than three signs on a premise require variances to the regulations in Chapter 694, thus providing a more comprehensive review of these proposals.

 

This report also proposes a number of changes to performance standards for signs within Chapter 694, intended to create more flexible regulations for first party signs throughout the city. These changes have been identified based on experience with the provisions of Chapter 694 since its introduction in April 2010.

 

Finally, changes are proposed to the Sign District designations for 67 locations in 11 Wards to make the designations of these premises consistent with their current use.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Amendments to Chapter 694 of the Municipal Code, Signs, General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59351.pdf
Appendix 1: Proposed Changes to Chapter 694
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59410.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 2: Sign District Map Ward 6: Etobicoke-Lakeshore
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59370.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 3: Sign District Map Ward 8: York West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59371.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 4: Sign District Map Ward 11: York South-Weston
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59354.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 5: Sign District Map Ward 19: Trinity-Spadina
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59373.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 6: Sign District Map Ward 20: Trinity-Spadina
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59374.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 7: Sign District Map Ward 23: Willowdale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59375.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 8: Sign District Map Ward 26: Don Valley West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59356.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 9: Sign District Map Ward 27: Toronto Centre-Rosedale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59357.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 10: Sign District Map Ward 28: Toronto Centre-Rosedale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59358.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 11: Sign District Map Ward 41: Scarborough-Rouge River
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59359.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Appendix 12: Sign District Map Ward 44: Scarborough East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59360.pdf
(June 13, 2013) Notice of Public Meeting on Sign By-law (Chapter 694)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59460.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 10, 2013) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP, Barristers and Solicitors (CC.Supp.PG25.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39084.pdf

PG25.14 - Toronto Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program: Payment of Rebates for 2010, 2011 and 2012 Tax Years

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1163 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct staff to process heritage tax rebate applications received in 2011, 2012 and 2013 for the tax years 2010, 2011 and 2012, in accordance with Chapter 103, Article VII of the Municipal Code.

 

2.         City Council direct staff in consultation with the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, to calculate rebates for the tax years 2010, 2011 and 2012 in the same manner as for the tax years 2008 and 2009 including that:

 

a.         The rebate shall be 40% of the annual property taxes that are attributable to the portion of the building or structure that is identified in the Heritage Easement Agreement as the heritage attributes, elements or features;

 

b.         Despite recommendation 2a, the maximum amount of the heritage tax reduction to be paid for an individual property is $500,000 annually.

 

3.         City Council direct that the rebate amount calculated by City staff in consultation with the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation is final.

 

4.         City Council direct staff to require applicants to provide an acknowledgement in writing that they have maintained the heritage attributes, elements or features in accordance with the Heritage Easement Agreement and that they accept the rebate amount in full satisfaction of their rebate application for the applicable year.

 

5.         City Council direct that the total annual costs of the municipal portion of rebates provided for the 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years shall not exceed $2 million in each year.

 

6.         City Council direct staff to report back in the 4th quarter of 2013 on changes to the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program to be implemented in 2014 for the tax year 2013 and subsequent years, separate from the processing of rebates for the 2010, 2011 and 2012 tax years recommended in this report, notwithstanding its decision of June 8 and 9, 2010 that these two items be concurrent.

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council to give effect to these recommendations.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that the applications for heritage property tax rebates received in 2011, 2012 and 2013 for the tax years 2010, 2011 and 2012 be processed in accordance with this report. The report also recommends that staff bring forward a report in the 4th quarter of 2013 on changes to the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program to be implemented in 2014 for the tax year 2013 and subsequent years.

 

In accordance with Council's decision in June 2010, the processing of applications received in February 2011 (for 2010 taxes paid) and subsequent years was postponed pending a further report from staff on a review of the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program.  Applications received in February 2012 for the 2011 tax year and February 2013 for the 2012 tax year will be processed concurrently with the 2011 applications upon the approval of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2013) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Toronto Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program: Payment of Rebates for 2010, 2011 and 2012 Tax Years
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59342.pdf

14a - Toronto Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program: Payment of Rebates for 2010, 2011 and 2012 Tax Years

Origin
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2013 considered a report (May 28, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, respecting Toronto Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program: Payment of Rebates for 2010, 2011 and 2012 Tax Years.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on the Toronto Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program: Payment of Rebates for 2010, 2011 and 2012 Tax Years
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59369.pdf

PG25.15 - Approval of 2013 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve awards for the 2013 Toronto Heritage Grant Program for the 24 heritage properties in the City of Toronto, as set out below, to assist in funding the scope of restoration work generally described in Attachment 1 of the report (May 10, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the Toronto Heritage Grant Program previously approved by City Council.

 

a.         3180 Bathurst Street, place of worship, $35,000

b.         469 Broadview Avenue, log house, $10,000

c.         62 Brunswick Avenue, house, $8,500

d.         34 Chestnut Park, house, $7,500

e.         6 Draper Street, house, $8,000

f.          14 Draper Street, house, $10,000

g.         23 Draper Street, house, $9,000

h.         29 Draper Street, house, $7,000

i.          2154 Dundas Street West, converted factory, $30,000

j.          68 East Liberty Street, former prison chapel, $40,000

k.         136 First Avenue, house, $3,000

l.          194 First Avenue, house, $6,000

m.        92 Isabella Street, house, $7,700

n.         141 McCaul Street, monastery, $20,000

o.         31 Prince Arthur Street, house $2,300

p.         39 Queen's Park Crescent, coach house, $10,000

q.         159 Roxborough Drive, place of worship, $20,000

r.          443 Sackville Street, house, $3,500

s.          19 Trinity Square, place of worship, $30,000

t.          332 Wellesley Street East, house, $3,500

u.         80 Willcocks Street, house, $7,500

v.         82 Willcocks Street, house, $9,000

w.        83 Willcocks Street, house, $10,000

x.         85 Willcocks Street, house, $10,000

 

2.         City Council direct that the use of the grant awards outlined in recommendation 1 of the report (May 10, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, be limited to only the proposed restoration work approved by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and that issuing of the grant award be subject to the grant recipient satisfying all conditions as set out in the Letter of Understanding between the City and the grant recipient.

Origin

(May 10, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the recommended grant awards for the 2013 Toronto Heritage Grant Program as set out in this report.

 

The Toronto Heritage Grant Program provides matching grant funds for eligible heritage restoration work to owners of properties in the City of Toronto designated under Part IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act.  The Toronto Heritage Grant Program is administered by Heritage Preservation Services, City Planning Division.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 10, 2013) Report with Attachment 1, from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on Approval of 2013 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59286.pdf

15a - Approval of 2013 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards

Origin
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2013 considered a revised report (May 10, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, respecting Approval of 2013 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on the Approval of 2013 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59395.pdf

PG25.16 - Permanent Short-Term Delegation of Authority for Applications under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1119 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 103, Heritage, by adding a new Article IX, Delegation of Authority, providing that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, is granted delegated authority during election periods, summer recess, periods of labour disruption or any other  circumstance where Council, Community Councils and the Toronto Preservation Board do not have regularly scheduled meetings for periods of time that would preclude Council from responding to notices and applications made under the Ontario Heritage Act  ("the Act") within legislated time lines, to:

 

a.         give notice of intention to designate properties listed on the City's Heritage register in response to notices of intention to demolish.

 

b.         refuse applications made under sections 32 (2), 33(4), 34(2) and 42(4.1) of the Act, including applications to repeal a designating by-law, applications to alter, demolish or remove buildings or structures on properties designated under Part IV of the Act and applications to erect, alter, demolish or remove buildings or structures on properties designated under Part V of the Act.

 

2          City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to City Council through the Toronto Preservation Board and respective Community Councils during the first regularly scheduled meeting cycle following the relevant period of delegation with a list of applications, notices received and decisions made during the period of delegation.

 

3.         City Council direct that approval of the report (May 6, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning by the Toronto Preservation Board shall be deemed to constitute consultation with the Toronto Preservation Board with respect to the exercise of delegated authority by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning for all purposes under the Act, including subsections 29(2), 32(2), 33(4), 34(2) and 42 (4.1).

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council to give effect to this delegation.

Origin

(May 6, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council amend the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 103, Heritage, to delegate authority to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division (the "Chief Planner"), to make certain decisions in relation to applications to repeal designating by-laws and applications to erect, alter or demolish buildings or structures on properties designated under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act, and to give notice of intention to designate listed properties during election periods, summer recess, periods of labour disruption or any other  circumstance where Council, Community Councils or the Toronto Preservation Board do not have regularly scheduled meetings for periods of time that would preclude Council from responding to notices and applications made under the Ontario Heritage Act within legislated time lines.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 6, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on Permanent Short-Term Delegation of Authority for Applications under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59340.pdf

16a - Permanent Short Term Delegation of Authority for Applications under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act

Origin
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2013 considered a report (May 6, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, respecting Permanent Short-Term Delegation of Authority for Applications under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information (Committee)
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on Permanent Short Term Delegation of Authority for Applications under Parts IV and V of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59345.pdf

PG25.17 - Eco-Roof Incentive Program: Progress Report #3

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Director of the Environment and Energy Office to amend the eligibility requirements in the Terms and Conditions of the Eco-Roof Incentive Program, to include residential buildings.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Director of the Environment and Energy Office to amend the eligibility requirements in the Terms and Conditions of the Eco-Roof Incentive Program, to increase the amount of the incentive offered to green roof projects to $75 per square metre.

 

3.         City Council request the City Solicitor prepare an amendment to Chapter 492 of the Municipal Code – Green Roofs, known as the Toronto Green Roof By-law, to allow funds collected as cash-in-lieu of construction of a green roof be directed to the Eco-Roof Incentive Program for the provision of green roofs and cool roofs.

Origin

(June 6, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

Green and cool roofs – known together as 'eco-roofs' – help make Toronto more sustainable and better adapted to climate change. Green and cool roofs reduce urban heat and its associated energy use. Green roofs also help manage storm water runoff, enhance biodiversity, improve air quality, and beautify our city. The implementation of eco-roofs supports businesses and creates jobs in the green industry.

 

In order to support the adoption of eco-roofs by building owners, the City of Toronto established the Eco-Roof Incentive Program in 2008, which is administered by the Environment and Energy Office. The program is intended to complement the City of Toronto’s Green Roof By-law that mandates green roofs for new building construction. The Eco-Roof Incentive Program currently applies to existing industrial, commercial and institutional buildings, new buildings not subject to the City's Green Roof By-law, and all new and existing Toronto Public and Separate School Board buildings.

 

This report outlines proposed changes to the program to help further advance the implementation of eco-roofs in Toronto. Proposed changes to increase the uptake of eco-roofs include expanding the program to include residential buildings and increasing the amount of the incentive offered to green roof installations.

 

Funding for the program in 2009 – 2012 came from a dedicated reserve. Starting in 2013 the program became self-sustaining with funding coming from the cash-in-lieu policy tied to the Green Roof By-law. This report recommends an amendment to the Green Roof By-law to allow cash-in-lieu funds to be made available for both cool roof and green roof projects through the Eco-Roof Incentive Program. Currently, funds collected for buildings in lieu of the construction of green roofs can be directed to green roofs only.

 

This report also provides an update on the Eco-Roof Incentive Program.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2013) Report with Appendix 1, from the Chief Corporate Officer on the Eco-Roof Incentive Program: Progress Report #3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-59382.pdf

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 24

PW24.3 - Long Term Waste Management Strategy - Terms of Reference

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Terms of Reference for Long Term Waste Management Strategy outlined in the report (June 4, 2013) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, by:

 

a.         adding the following under the heading "Key Deliverables":

 

-           A detailed review of the potential impact of the Province’s proposed Waste Reduction Act and Strategy on the City’s waste management system, including the diversion rate and landfill disposal rate over the next 10 to 20 years

 

-           The development of a new Waste Reduction and Diversion Plan for 2016 to 2026 with new targets and strategies.

 

b.         amending the introductory paragraph under the heading “Scope” to read as follows:

 

"In developing the Long Term Waste Management Strategy, Solid Waste Management Services staff and a consultant who will be hired to assist with the Strategy will undertake a review of all potential options for the diversion, disposal and energy recovery of Toronto’s waste for the next 30 to 50 years, beginning with options to reduce waste going to disposal."

 

c.         replacing the section headed “A comprehensive review of any new and emerging source separation techniques” with the following:

 

“A comprehensive review of waste diversion techniques and practices

 

This includes a review of:

 

-           existing as well as “new and emerging” diversion techniques and technologies;

-           best practices and emerging public education and engagement techniques to increase public participation in  waste reduction and diversion actions;

            options to increase waste reduction and diversion through waste fees and waste bylaw enforcement;

-           options to include all waste customers in Toronto in waste reduction and diversion activities, including non-residential customers, City ABCDs, and schools; and

-           options to engage other users of City landfill.

 

2.         City Council adopt the Terms of Reference as outlined in the report (June 4, 2013) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and as amended in Recommendation 1 above, and authorize the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to proceed with a Request for Proposals for a consultant to assist with the development of the Long Term Waste Management Strategy.

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee with updates on development of the Long Term Waste Management Strategy at key milestones, and that the resultant final draft Long Term Waste Management Strategy be submitted to City Council for approval.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee referred the letter (June 19, 2013) from Councillor Anthony Perruzza on a strategy for the reduction, reuse and recycling of single-use hot and cold drink cups to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, for consideration as part of the Long Term Waste Management Strategy.

Origin

(June 4, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services

Summary

This report is in response to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee’s request for a follow up report on the proposed terms of reference and process for the development of a Long Term Waste Management Strategy.  The report provides a summary of the proposed statement of work, guiding principles, scope, key deliverables, public consultation, costs, and timelines of the study. 

 

Solid Waste Management Services staff will develop the Long Term Waste Management Strategy, in consultation with members of the public and community stakeholders.  Solid Waste Management Services staff will issue a Request for Proposals for a consultant to assist with the preparation of the Strategy.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 4, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, on Long Term Waste Management Strategy - Terms of Reference
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-59164.pdf

Speakers

Rod Muir, Sierra Club Canada and Waste Diversion Toronto
Emily J. Alfred, Waste Campaigner, Toronto Environmental Alliance
Councillor Mary-Margaret Mahon
Councillor Adam Vaughan
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Karen Buck, President, Citizens for a Safe Environment (PW.New.PW24.3.1)
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Ward 8 - York West (PW.New.PW24.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/comm/communicationfile-38625.pdf

PW24.8 - Implementation of the Shaw Street Bikeway

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
19 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bills 1137, 1138 and 1139 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of bicycle lanes on both sides of Shaw Street, from Douro Street to King Street West.

 

2.         City Council rescind the alternate side parking regulations on Shaw Street, between Dundas Street West and Bloor Street, and replace it with parking at all times on the west side of Shaw Street, between Dundas Street West and Bloor Street West.

 

3.         City Council rescind the one-way southbound designation for Shaw Street, between Dundas Street West and Dupont Street, and replace it by designating the general purpose traffic lane one-way southbound, between Dundas Street West and Dupont Street.

 

4.         City Council approve the installation of a northbound bicycle lane on Shaw Street, between Dundas Street West and Dupont Street.

 

5.         City Council approve the installation of northbound stop controls for the northbound bicycle lane on Shaw Street at the intersections of  Harrison Street, College Street, Dewson Street, Barton Street, Irene Avenue, Essex Street and Hallam Street.

 

6.         City Council request that the Ontario Ministry of Transportation allow Toronto to pilot the use of bicycle lenses on bicycle specific signals at intersections in Toronto.

 

7.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Recommendations 1 to 6 above, including the introduction of all necessary bills.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

Shaw Street intersects with five major east-west bikeways in one of Toronto’s busiest cycling areas: the College Street, Harbord Street, Barton Avenue, Hallam Street-Lappin Avenue, and Davenport Road bikeways.  The proposed Shaw Street bikeway will provide an important north-south cycling connection to these bikeway facilities from Davenport Road in the north to Douro Street in the south, as well as to the future extension of the West Toronto Railpath.  

 

City Council previously approved bicycle lanes, including contra-flow bicycle lanes, on some of these sections of Shaw Street (a contra-flow bike lane is one that operates in the opposite direction to the motor vehicle traffic flow on a designated one-way street).  However, the bicycle lanes were not installed due to concerns that the City’s approach to contra-flow bicycle lanes was not consistent with provisions of the Ontario Highway Traffic Act (HTA). The HTA concern has recently been resolved with the Ministry of Transportation and implementation can now proceed.

 

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to install the bicycle lane sections along Shaw Street to provide a continuous bikeway between Davenport Road and Douro Street, using bicycle lanes and shared lane markings (sharrows) where appropriate.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 27, 2013) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Implementation of the Shaw Street Bikeway
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-59269.pdf

Speakers

Hamish Wilson
Eugene Chao
Robert Pritchard
Tamara Brooks
Yiting (Jessica) Su
Antonio Oliveira

Communications (Committee)

(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Laurie Gordon (PW.New.PW24.8.1)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Bruce Gavin Ward, Member, Architecture for Humanity Toronto (PW.New.PW24.8.2)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Kim Bethke (PW.New.PW24.8.3)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Luke Murphy (PW.New.PW24.8.4)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Annie Dupuis (PW.New.PW24.8.5)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Antony Hilliard (PW.New.PW24.8.6)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Kristin Cavoukian (PW.New.PW24.8.7)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Daniel Mitroi (PW.New.PW24.8.8)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Jeffery T. Carlton (PW.New.PW24.8.9)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Andrea Calver (PW.New.PW24.8.10)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Neil Brandt (PW.New.PW24.8.11)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Amanda Lewis (PW.New.PW24.8.12)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from David Simmons (PW.New.PW24.8.13)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Emily Shepard (PW.New.PW24.8.14)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Bartek Ciszkowski (PW.New.PW24.8.15)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Elana Horowitz (PW.New.PW24.8.16)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Natasha Valentine (PW.New.PW24.8.17)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Steven LeMay (PW.New.PW24.8.18)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Mary J. Castel (PW.New.PW24.8.19)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Donald Simmons (PW.New.PW24.8.20)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Michael Barker (PW.New.PW24.8.21)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Ben Pakuts (PW.New.PW24.8.22)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Tom Howell (PW.New.PW24.8.23)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Dana Howse (PW.New.PW24.8.24)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Jennifer Beer (PW.New.PW24.8.25)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Chriz Miller (PW.New.PW24.8.26)
(June 15, 2013) E-mail from Stuart Bustard (PW.New.PW24.8.27)
(June 15, 2013) E-mail from Anita Neufeld (PW.New.PW24.8.28)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Kevin Cooper (PW.New.PW24.8.29)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Herb van den Dool (PW.New.PW24.8.30)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Jennifer Polk (PW.New.PW24.8.31)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Jennifer Stacey (PW.New.PW24.8.32)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW24.8.33)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Sam Bootsma (PW.New.PW24.8.34)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Moira Gracey (PW.New.PW24.8.35)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from David Oppenheim (PW.New.PW24.8.36)
(June 18, 2013) Letter from Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW24.8.37)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Mallory Hazlett (PW.New.PW24.8.38)
(June 18, 2013) Submission from Siva Vijenthira, Youth Cycling Program Worker, CultureLink Settlement Services (PW.New.PW24.8.39)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from William Matthews (PW.New.PW24.8.40)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Paul Bien (PW.New.PW24.8.41)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from James Schwartz (PW.New.PW24.8.42)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Iain Campbell (PW.New.PW24.8.43)
(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Nancy Smith Lea, Director, Toronto Centre for Active Transportation (TCAT) Clean Air Partnership (PW.New.PW24.8.44)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Liz Sutherland (PW.New.PW24.8.45)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Jessica Stronghill (PW.New.PW24.8.46)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Ian Ferguson (PW.New.PW24.8.47)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Sandra Brombal and Asmus Georgi (PW.New.PW24.8.48)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Eldon Pierce (PW.New.PW24.8.49)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Kris Coward (PW.New.PW24.8.50)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Amanda Landre (PW.New.PW24.8.51)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Joey Schwartz (PW.New.PW24.8.52)
(June 18, 2013) Petition from Mary Jo Loucano forwarding a petition signed by 62 residents opposing the Implementation of the Shaw Street Bikeway (PW.New.PW24.8.53)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Laura Pin (PW.New.PW24.8.54)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Margaret Wells (PW.New.PW24.8.55)
(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Iwona Kurman, Principal, Central Commerce Collegiate (PW.New.PW24.8.56)

PW24.9 - Amendment to Subsection 179-7 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 179, Parking Authority, and Other By-laws

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bills 1132 and 1133 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 179, Parking Authority, to provide the Toronto Parking Authority with standing authority, at on-street paid parking locations within the time periods that parking is permitted at such locations, to amend the maximum parking period, subject to the agreement of the local Ward Councillor.

 

2.         City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 179, Parking Authority, to provide the City Solicitor with standing authority to process amendments to City by-laws regulating on-street parking meters and parking machines to incorporate the change to the maximum parking period, on certification to the City Solicitor by the President of the Toronto Parking Authority that the change to the maximum parking period is in accordance with the criteria set out in Recommendation 1 of the report (June 5, 2013) from the President, Toronto Parking Authority.

 

3.         City Council amend the necessary City of Toronto by-laws to exempt parking meter and machine locations, where the maximum parking period is greater than three hours, from the general three-hour maximum parking period.

Origin

(June 5, 2013) Report from the President, Toronto Parking Authority

Summary

This report recommends an amendment to Subsection 179-7 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 179, Parking Authority. The requested amendment is a minor adjustment to the current delegated authority to the Toronto Parking Authority, at on-street paid parking locations within the time periods that parking is permitted at such locations, to also encompass the maximum parking period, that is the duration for which parking is allowed, subject to agreement from the City Councillor in whose ward the changes are proposed. This report also requests delegated authority to the City Solicitor to process amendments to City by-laws regulating on-street parking meters and machines to incorporate changes to the maximum parking period. This request is consistent with the existing delegated authority to change the rates and operating hours at the meters and machines as set out in Chapter 179.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 5, 2013) Report from the President, Toronto Parking Authority, on Amendment to Subsection 179-7 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 179, Parking Authority, and Other By-laws
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-59432.pdf

Striking Committee - Meeting 10

ST10.1 - Council Member Appointment to the Community Development and Recreation Committee to Fill a Vacancy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint Councillor Jaye Robinson to the Community Development and Recreation Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014, and until a successor is appointed.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Chair called for nominations.

 

Councillor Ana Bailão nominated Councillor Jaye Robinson.

 

The Chair called for further nominations.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a second time.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a third and final time.

 

The Chair closed the nominations.

 

The vote for the nominee carried and Councillor Jaye Robinson is recommended for appointment to the Community Development and Recreation Committee.

Summary

The Community Development and Recreation Committee is composed of 5 Members of Council appointed by City Council plus a Chair appointed by the Mayor.

 

Councillor Moeser has submitted a letter (June 11, 2013) advising of his resignation from the Community Development and Recreation Committee.

 

Members of Council have been canvassed for their interest in being appointed to the Community Development and Recreation Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014, and until a successor is appointed.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ron Moeser advising that he is resigning from the Community Development and Recreation Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59697.pdf
Interested Members - Community Development and Recreation Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59698.pdf

ST10.2 - Council Member Appointment to the Licensing and Standards Committee to Fill a Vacancy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint Councillor Ron Moeser to the Licensing and Standards Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014, and until a successor is appointed.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Chair called for nominations.

 

Councillor Doug Ford nominated Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti.

Councillor Karen Stintz nominated Councillor Ron Moeser.

 

The Chair called for further nominations.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a second time.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a third and final time.

 

The Chair closed the nominations.

 

Councillor Ford, with the permission of the Committee, withdrew his nomination. 

 

The vote for the nominee carried and Councillor Ron Moeser is recommended for appointment to the Licensing and Standards Committee.

Summary

The Licensing and Standards Committee is composed of 5 Members of Council appointed by City Council plus a Chair appointed by the Mayor.

 

Councillor Perruzza has submitted a letter (June 11, 2013) advising of his resignation from the Licensing and Standards Committee.

 

Members of Council have been canvassed for their interest in being appointed to the Licensing and Standards Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014, and until a successor is appointed.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2013) Letter from Councillor Anthony Perruzza advising that he is resigning from the Licensing and Standards Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59793.pdf
Interested Members - Licensing and Standards Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59794.pdf

ST10.3 - Council Member Appointment to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee to Fill a Vacancy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint Councillor Jaye Robinson to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Chair called for nominations.

 

Councillor Ana Bailão nominated Councillor Jaye Robinson.

 

The Chair called for further nominations.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a second time.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a third and final time.

 

The Chair closed the nominations.

 

The vote for the nominee carried and Councillor Jaye Robinson is recommended for appointment to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee.

Summary

The Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee is composed of 3 Members from the Community Development and Recreation Committee and 3 Members from the Economic Development Committee.

 

Councillor Moeser was previously appointed to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee as a member from the Community Development and Recreation Committee. As a result of Councillor Moeser's resignation from the Community Development and Recreation Committee, Council must appoint a replacement Member from the Community Development and Recreation Committee.

 

Members of Council have been canvassed for their interest in being appointed to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

Interested Members - Community Partnership and Investment Program Apeals Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59795.pdf

ST10.4 - Council Member Appointment to the Toronto Foundation for Student Success

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint Councillor Paula Fletcher to the Toronto Foundation for Student Success for a term of office until November 30, 2014, and until a successor is appointed.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Chair called for nominations.

 

Councillor Karen Stintz nominated Councillor Paula Fletcher.

 

The Chair called for further nominations.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a second time.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a third and final time.

 

The Chair closed the nominations.

 

The vote for the nominee carried and Councillor Paula Fletcher is recommended for appointment to the Toronto Foundation for Student Success.

Summary

City Council at its May 7, 8, 9, and 10, 2013 meeting decided to resume the appointment of a City Council Member to the Toronto Foundation for Student Success (EX31.5).

 

The Toronto Foundation for Student Success is composed of 20 Directors including 1 Member of Council selected by City Council and confirmed by the Members of the Board.

 

Members have been canvassed for their interest in being appointed to the Toronto Foundation for Student Success for a term of office until November 30, 2014, and until a successor is appointed.

Background Information (Committee)

Interested Members - Toronto Foundation for Student Success
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59796.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 27, 2013) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth (ST.New.ST10.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/comm/communicationfile-38725.pdf

ST10.5 - Council Member Appointments to the Economic Growth and Job Creation Advisory Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that City Council appoint the following Members to the Economic Growth and Job Creation Advisory Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014:

 

-           Councillor Ana Bailão; and

-           Councillor Karen Stintz;

 

plus the following Members in accordance with the approved composition for this Advisory Committee:

 

-           Mayor Rob Ford, as Chair;

-           Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee;

-           Councillor Peter Milczyn, Chair, Planning and Growth Management Committee; and

-           Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair, Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Chair called for nominations.

 

Councillor Doug Ford nominated Councillor Ana Bailão.

 

Councillor Karen Stintz nominated herself.

 

The Chair called for further nominations.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a second time.

 

The Chair called for further nominations a third and final time.

 

The Chair closed the nominations.

 

The vote for the nominees carried and Councillor Ana Bailão and Councillor Karen Stintz are recommended for appointment to the Economic Growth and Job Creation Advisory Committee.

Summary

City Council at its February 20 and 21, 2013 meeting established a new Economic Growth and Job Creation Advisory Committee (ED19.4).

 

The Economic Growth and Job Creation Advisory Committee is composed of 20 to 25 Members, including 2 members at-large, appointed by City Council. These are new appointments.

 

Members of Council have been canvassed for their interested in being appointed to the Economic Growth and Job Creation Advisory Committee as at-large members for a term until November 30, 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

Interested Members - Economic Growth and Job Creation Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59797.pdf
Terms of Reference - Economic Growth and Job Creation Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59799.pdf

ST10.6 - 2014 Schedule of Meetings

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the meeting schedule dates in the Striking Committee Recommended 2014 Meeting Schedule and that the published schedule serve as notice for these meetings.

 

2.         City Council request the City Clerk to distribute the approved schedule to the City's agencies and special purpose bodies with a request that they:

 

a.         avoid scheduling meetings, whenever possible, that conflict with the approved schedule; and

 

b.         avoid scheduling public meetings, forums, public consultations and large scale meetings on days of cultural or religious significance as noted in the approved schedule.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Striking Committee's recommended meeting schedule exchanges the February and March meeting dates for the Economic Development Committee and the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, so that the Economic Development Committee will meet on February 26, 2014 and the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee will meet on March 4, 2014.

Origin

(June 20, 2013) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

This report recommends the 2014 meeting schedule for Council and its Committees. The proposed schedule is guided by established scheduling assumptions and Council's directions.  The proposed schedule reflects dates for approval of the 2014 Capital and Operating Budgets, as recommended by the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer in a related report before the Executive Committee at its July meeting.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 27, 2013) Striking Committee Recommended 2014 Meeting Schedule
(June 20, 2013) report from the City Clerk on the 2014 Schedule of Meetings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-59820.pdf
Attachment 1 - 2014 Proposed Meeting Schedule

Communications (Committee)

(June 26, 2013) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee (ST.New.ST10.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/comm/communicationfile-38714.pdf

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 25

EY25.1 - Final Report - 5055 Dundas Street West - City Initiated Amendment to Zoning By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 1555-2012(OMB), for the lands formerly known as 5055 Dundas Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 27, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the registered Section 37 Agreement for the property formerly known as 5055 Dundas Street West to reflect the reallocation of the residual $275,000 contribution as outlined in the report (May 27, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

4.         Prior to the introduction of Bills to Council, City Council require the City Solicitor to obtain consent to amend the Section 37 Agreement for the property formerly known as 5055 Dundas Street West from all relevant parties and/or their successors in Title to the Section 37 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

At its meeting of May 15, 2012 Etobicoke York Community Council directed staff to review the status of secured but unexpended Section 37 funds in Ward 5 for the purpose of identifying funds that could be reallocated to alternate appropriate community benefits in Ward 5 and to undertake City-initiated Zoning By-law amendments accordingly.  Alternate appropriate community benefits were defined in this direction as parks, streetscape improvements, recreation, public art or community facilities.

 

The property formerly known as 5055 Dundas Street West (now known as 5005 and 5055 Dundas Street West and 0, 3, 5, 11, 15 and 17 Michael Powers Place) has been identified as one such property with a Section 37 Agreement which could be amended. 

 

As directed by Etobicoke York Community Council, this report proposes amendments to the former City of Etobicoke Zoning By-law 1555-2012(OMB) and the related Section 37 Agreement for the purpose of allowing the reallocation of secured but unexpended Section 37 funds.  The total amount of the Section 37 funds collected would not be altered.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a City Initiated Amendment to Zoning By-law - Final Report - 5055 Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58637.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(December 11, 2012) Letter from the Village of Islington Business Improvement Area (EY.Main.EY25.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-37763.pdf

EY25.2 - Final Report - 5145 Dundas Street West - City Initiated Amendment to Site Specific Official Plan and Zoning By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council delete the relevant site-specific Section 37 provisions in the Etobicoke Centre Secondary Plan Chapter of the Official Plan, for the lands formerly known as 5145 Dundas Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council amend the site-specific Zoning By-law 751-2003, for the lands formerly known as 5145 Dundas Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 2 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the registered Section 37 Agreement for the property formerly known as 5145 Dundas Street West to reflect the reallocation of the $225,000 contribution as outlined in the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

5.         Prior to the introduction of Bills to Council, City Council require the City Solicitor to obtain consent to amend the Section 37 Agreement for the property formerly known as 5145 Dundas Street West from all relevant parties and/or their successors in Title to the Section 37 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

At its meeting of May 15, 2012 Etobicoke York Community Council directed staff to review the status of secured but unexpended Section 37 funds in Ward 5 for the purpose of identifying funds that could be reallocated to alternate appropriate community benefits in Ward 5 and to undertake City-initiated Zoning By-law amendments accordingly.  Alternate appropriate community benefits were defined in this direction as parks, streetscape improvements, recreation, public art or community facilities.

 

The property formerly known as 5145 Dundas Street West (now known as 3 and 7 Summerland Terrace, 3, 15 and 5129 Dundas Street West and 11 Dunbloor Road) has been identified as one such property with a Section 37 Agreement which could be amended. 

 

As directed by Etobicoke York Community Council, this report proposes to delete the relevant site-specific Section 37 provisions in the Etobicoke Centre Secondary Plan and to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning By-law 751-2003 and the related Section 37 Agreement for the purpose of allowing the reallocation of secured but unexpended Section 37 funds.  The total amount of the Section 37 funds collected would not be altered.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a City Initiated Amendment to Site Specific Official Plan and Zoning By-law - Final Report - 5145 Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58687.pdf

EY25.3 - Final Report - 700 Evans Avenue - City Initiated Amendment to Zoning By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council  recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (May 27, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, for information.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

At its meeting of May 15, 2012 Etobicoke York Community Council directed staff to review the status of secured but unexpended Section 37 funds in Ward 5 for the purpose of identifying funds that could be reallocated to alternate appropriate community benefits in Ward 5 and to undertake City-initiated Zoning By-law amendments accordingly.  Alternate appropriate community benefits were defined in this direction as parks, streetscape improvements, recreation, public art or community facilities.

 

The property formerly known as 700 Evans Avenue (now known as 700 Evans Avenue and 225 and 235 Sherway Gardens Road) has been identified as one such property with a Section 37 Agreement which could be amended. 

 

As directed by Etobicoke York Community Council, this report proposes amendments to the former City of Etobicoke Zoning By-law 760-2006 (OMB) and the related Section 37 Agreement for the purpose of allowing the reallocation of secured but unexpended Section 37 funds.  The total amount of the Section 37 funds collected would not be altered.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a City Initiated Amendment to Zoning By-law - Final Report - 700 Evans Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58640.pdf

Speakers

Judith Seregelly

Communications (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) E-mail from S. Kingsley (EY.Main.EY25.3.1)

EY25.4 - Final Report - 2 Fieldway Road - City Initiated Amendment to Zoning By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The City Planning Division recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Site Specific Zoning By-law 963-2006, for the lands formerly known as 2 Fieldway Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the registered Section 37 Agreement for the property formerly known as 2 Fieldway Road to reflect the reallocation of the $50,000 contribution as outlined in the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

4.         Prior to the introduction of Bills to Council, City Council require the City Solicitor to obtain consent to amend the Section 37 Agreement for the property formerly known as 2 Fieldway Road from all relevant parties and/or their successors in Title to the Section 37 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

At its meeting of May 15, 2012 Etobicoke York Community Council directed staff to review the status of secured but unexpended Section 37 funds in Ward 5 for the purpose of identifying funds that could be reallocated to alternate appropriate community benefits in Ward 5 and to undertake City-initiated Zoning By-law amendments accordingly.  Alternate appropriate community benefits were defined in this direction as parks, streetscape improvements, recreation, public art or community facilities.

 

The property formerly known as 2 Fieldway Road (now known as 2 and 8 Fieldway Road) has been identified as one such property with a Section 37 Agreement which could be amended. 

 

As directed by Etobicoke York Community Council, this report proposes amendments to the former City of Etobicoke Zoning By-law 963-2006 and the related Section 37 Agreement for the purpose of allowing the reallocation of secured but unexpended Section 37 funds.  The total amount of the Section 37 funds collected would not be altered.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a City Initiated Amendment to Zoning By-law - Final Report - 2 Fieldway Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58686.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) E-mail from Anita Groman (EY.Main.EY25.4.1)

EY25.5 - Final Report - 2 Keelesdale Road (25 Photography Drive) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - York South-Weston
Attention
Bill 1085 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 for the lands at 2 Keelesdale Road (25 Photography Drive) substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council require the property owner to install a crash wall that will protect the proposed gas station site from any future train derailment.  Staff from Municipal Licensing and Standards, and any other necessary Divisions, to work with the local Councillors to design a crash wall that will defer graffiti from taking place on the wall (such as art).


4.         City Council request the Ministry of the Environment to provide advice in writing to the City Councillors for Wards 11 and 12 and to the Mount Dennis Community Association, on the steps being taken to address the presence of methane on the 2 Keelesdale Road site.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 to permit a gasoline bar (vehicle fuel station) at 2 Keelesdale Road.  The proposed development is to be located on the southerly portion of a No Frills grocery store site and is to be a complementary use to the existing food store.

 

Planning staff are of the opinion the proposal is consistent with the Official Plan and that the proposed use is appropriate for the site.  The proposed gasoline bar would support and contribute to the economic function of the adjacent Employment District by providing a local service to area businesses and adjacent uses.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83, as amended.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report - 2 Keelesdale Road (25 Photography Drive)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58690.pdf

Speakers

Jonathan Rodger, Zelinka Priamo Ltd.
Agnes Luongo, Mount Dennis Community Association

Communications (Community Council)

(June 17, 2013) Letter from Simon Chamberlain, Secretary, Mount Dennis Community Association (EY.New.EY25.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38427.pdf

EY25.6 - Final Report - 3560 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 1080 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for a portion of the lands at 3560 Lake Shore Boulevard West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (May 27, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit the construction of a single storey commercial retail building on a portion of 3560 Lake Shore Boulevard West. 

 

The applicant proposes to rezone a portion of 3560 Lake Shore Boulevard West as the initial phase of a redevelopment of a broader parcel of lands (3560, 3580 and 3600 Lake Shore Boulevard West).  The proposed commercial building on the lands subject to this report would provide for the relocation of an existing Beer Store from an adjacent property (3580 Lake Shore Boulevard West).   The relocation of the Beer Store into a new building on the subject lands would provide opportunities for a more complete redevelopment of the larger development parcel consistent with the objectives of Official Plan Site and Area Specific Policy 23.  The proposed commercial building would be appropriately located along Lake Shore Boulevard West to emphasize the pedestrian experience and screen surface parking spaces from the public realm along the arterial road. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report - 3560 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58641.pdf

EY25.7 - Final Report - 808 to 828 Runnymede Road - City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston
Attention
Bill 1108 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend former City of York  Zoning By-law No. 1-83 for the lands at 808 to 828 Runnymede Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 27, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This report recommends approval of a City-initiated Zoning By-law to amend former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 to change the zoning of the properties at 808 to 828 Runnymede Road from a Commercial Employment (CE) Zone to R2 – Residential Zone and to introduce a site specific zoning to recognize the existing residential uses on these properties. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a City-Initiated Zoning By-law Amendment - Final Report - 808 to 828 Runnymede Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58646.pdf

Speakers

Geoffrey McGrath, Habitat for Humanity Toronto

EY25.8 - Final Report - 2151-2155 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment Application and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Lifting of the Holding (H) Symbol

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Communication EY25.8.2 has been submitted on this item.

Bills 1149 and 1150 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 2151-2155 Lake Shore Boulevard West substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 1994-197 for the lands at 2151-2155 Lake Shore Boulevard West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, amended by deleting the following section 4(b):

 

                        4(b)    The AECOM Traffic Study for the Precinct Plan must be updated by the owner to the satisfaction of the Director, Transportation Services.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor, such agreement to be registered on title to secure the following facilities, services and matters from the owner at its expense:

 

 A.       A contribution of $350,000 for the construction of the Village Court, a publicly accessible private open space adjacent to 68 Marine Parade Drive which represents the value of the upgrades to Village Court above the previously secured contributions. This contribution is to be secured through a Letter of Credit in the same amount to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

              B.      A publicly accessible open space of up to 1,000 square metres, providing pedestrian access between Street C and Marine Parade Drive, the design and boundaries of which are determined in and through the site plan approval process subject to the design and construction of such publicly accessible open space being restricted to an upset limit of $500,000, said amount to be secured by a letter to credit to be provided prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for Tower “B”.   

 

C.         A cash contribution in the amount of $150,000.00 to be used for public park, streetscape or road improvements in the area, as determined by the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to be provided prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for Tower “A”. 

       

 D.       The cash amounts identified above shall be indexed annually in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.

 

E.        The following is also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement, as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.           The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with the Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009.

 

5.         City Council direct that the Core Infrastructure Agreement be finalized and registered on title to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Director, Transportation Services, prior to the lifting of the Holding Symbol.

 

6.         City Council require the owner, together with the Land Owner's group within the Humber Bay Shores Development Area, to submit cost estimates for the construction of municipal infrastructure, off-site road improvements, and required service upgrade(s) to service the Humber Bay Shores developments to the City for review, and submit financial securities based on the accepted cost estimates to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Director, Transportation Services prior to the lifting of the Holding Symbol.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Site Specific Zoning By-law 1994-197 and to lift the Holding (H) symbol to permit a 3-storey non-residential building fronting Lake Shore Boulevard West, a 436 unit, 49-storey residential tower on the central block of the development site, and a 186 unit, 14-storey residential building abutting Marine Parade Drive with ground-floor retail.  The project includes a linear park to provide a public/pedestrian connection between future Street “C”, which will bisect the site and Marine Parade Drive, located to the south of the proposed 14-storey building.

 

The proposal and its implementing site-specific amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law are consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conform to the Provincial Growth Plan.

 

The proposed development conforms to the general intent and principles of the Humber Bay Shores Urban Design Guidelines Update and Public Realm Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding an Official Plan Amendment Application and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Lifting of the Holding (H) Symbol - Final Report - 2151-2155 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58758.pdf

Speakers

J. Craig Hunter, President, Hunter & Associates Ltd.

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2013) Letter from Brian Bailey, President, Citizens Concerned About the Future of the Etobicoke Waterfront (CCFEW) (EY.New.EY25.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38348.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Kyle Gojic, On behalf of the CodeBlueWestTO Team (CC.New.EY25.8.2)

8a - Supplementary Report - 2151-2155 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Revisions to Recommendations

Origin
(June 17, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

This report provides revised recommendations to the May 30, 2013 report of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District entitled 2151-2155 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment Application and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Lifting the Holding (H) Symbol – Final Report (Item EY25.8).  This May 30, 2013 Final Report reviews and provides recommendations for an Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application that proposes a three-storey non-residential building fronting Lake Shore Boulevard West, a 49-storey residential tower on the central block of the development site and a 14-storey residential building abutting Marine Parade Drive with a total of 622 dwelling units.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 17, 2013) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Revisions to Recommendations - 2151-2155 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-59625.pdf

EY25.9 - Final Report - 160 and 161 Bob Yuill Drive, 30 Mary Chapman Boulevard and 1-49 Lou Pomanti Street (Formerly Part of 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application (Removal of the "H" Holding Symbol)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West
Attention
Bill 1121 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment provided as Attachment 2 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, as amended by site-specific Zoning By-law 482-2006 to remove the “H” Holding Symbol for 160 and 161 Bob Yuill Drive, 30 Mary Chapman Boulevard and 1-49 Lou Pomanti Street in the southern portion of the subdivision development formerly known as 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road.  The properties are zoned R5(9)(H) and RM2 (42)(H) and are proposed to be developed with detached and semi-detached dwellings.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to remove the 'H' Holding Symbol for the above property.

 

The proposal conforms to the policies of the Official Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application (Removal of the "H" Holding Symbol) - Final Report - 160 and 161 Bob Yuill Drive, 30 Mary Chapman Boulevard and 1-49 Lou Pomanti Street (Formerly Part of 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58651.pdf

EY25.10 - Final Report - 755 Humberwood Boulevard - Part Lot Control Exemption Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke North
Attention
Bill 1084 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands formerly known as 755 Humberwood Boulevard (Block 144, Registered Plan 66M-2289), as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (May 15, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

3.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

Origin

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This report reviews and recommends approval of an application for Part Lot Control Exemption for 16 pairs of semi-detached dwellings (32 units) on the lands formerly known as 755 Humberwood Boulevard (Block 144, Registered Plan 66M-2289).

 

An exemption from Part Lot Control will allow each lot containing a pair of semi-detached dwelling units to be subdivided creating 32 individual residential lots. 

 

The proposal complies with the existing Official Plan and Zoning By-law.  The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report - 755 Humberwood Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58647.pdf

EY25.11 - Final Report - 1-47 Lou Pomanti Street (Formerly Part of 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road) (Lots 39 to 50 Plan 66M-2474) - Part Lot Control Exemption Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West
Attention
Bill 1120 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law for 1-47 Lou Pomanti Street (Lots 39 to 50 on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2474, formerly part of 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road) as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (May 27, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

3.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title of the lands.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This report reviews and recommends approval of an application by Lindvest Properties (Westshep) Limited for Part Lot Control Exemption for 12 pairs of semi-detached dwellings (24 units) at 1-47 Lou Pomanti Street (Lots 39 to 50 on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2474). These lands are part of the lands formerly known as 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road.

 

This exemption from Part Lot Control will allow each lot containing a pair of semi-detached dwelling units to be subdivided yielding 24 individual residential lots each with a semi detached dwelling unit.

 

The proposal complies with the existing Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report - 1-47 Lou Pomanti Street (Formerly Part of 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road) (Lots 39 to 50 Plan 66M-2474)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58648.pdf

EY25.15 - Final Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Communications EY25.15.51 to EY25.15.71 have been submitted on this Item

Bill 1160 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the proposed Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 3 to the report (March 20, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with Schedule II, headed "Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan" replaced with the version appended to the report (June 17, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. 

 

2.         City Council delete the block bounded by Louisa Street, Victoria Street, Fleeceline Road and Lakeshore Boulevard West from inclusion in the Mimico-By-The-Lake Secondary Plan.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         City Council adopt the Mimico 20/20 Urban Design Guidelines as provided under separate cover and available at the following links:

 

http://www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/mimico2020udgls_feb_2013_part1_of_4.pdf

http://www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/mimico2020udgls_feb_2013_part2_of_4.pdf

http://www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/mimico2020udgls_feb_2013_part3_of_4.pdf

http://www.toronto.ca/planning/pdf/mimico2020udgls_feb_2013_part4_of_4.pdf

 

5.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager of Cluster B, in conjunction with the Deputy City Manager of Cluster A and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to explore options and actions the City could undertake to support the implementation of this new planning framework, and report back within eight months to the appropriate Standing Committee.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on April 9, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

 

Etobicoke York Community Council considered the following Items together:

 

-           EY23.15, headed "Final Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan"; and

 

-           EY23.16, headed "Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Lake Shore Boulevard West and Douglas Boulevard (Mimico Estates)".

Origin

(March 20, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This report presents the conclusions of the Mimico 20/20 Revitalization Study, recommends approval of the Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan and related amendments to the City's Official Plan, and recommends adoption of Urban Design Guidelines for the Secondary Plan area.

 

The proposed Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan provides the policy framework for revitalization and change within this community over the next twenty years.  Taking advantage of its unique lakeside setting, the Secondary Plan envisions an inclusive, mixed use community that is well integrated with the surrounding neighbourhood.  The Secondary Plan provides for choice in terms of mobility, work, shopping and recreational opportunities as well as housing in terms of built form, tenure and affordability.  A new public street structure is proposed to create new development blocks and to increase physical and visual access to Lake Ontario.

 

The proposed Secondary Plan is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 20, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding the Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-57442.pdf

Speakers

(April 9, 2013) Yasmin Virani
(April 9, 2013) Kyle Gojic, Code Blue West TO
(April 9, 2013) Peter Shepherd, Mimico Lakeshore Network (Submission Filed)
(April 9, 2013) Megan Norfolk
(April 9, 2013) Russ Ford, Executive Director, LAMP Community Health Centre
(April 9, 2013) Ted Scott
(April 9, 2013) Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP
(April 9, 2013) Kyra Trainor, President, Mimico Residents Association
(April 9, 2013) Victoria Bourgeois
(April 9, 2013) Paul Chomik
(April 9, 2013) Carolyn MacLeod, Ward 6 Community Action Team
(April 9, 2013) Starr Smith
(April 9, 2013) Denise Harris, Heritage Officer, Etobicoke Historical Society
(April 9, 2013) Irene Jones, Citizens Concerned about the future of the Etobicoke Waterfront
(April 9, 2013) J. Craig Hunter, President, Urban Planning and Development
(April 9, 2013) Dr. Maureen Henderson, Chair, MBTL-BIA
(April 9, 2013) Peter Swinton, PMG Planning (Submission Filed)
(April 9, 2013) Taylor Morassutti, One Superior Avenue Inc.
(April 9, 2013) Walter Maceluch
(April 9, 2013) Ruth Grier
(April 9, 2013) George Platsis
(June 18, 2013) Martin Gerwin, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Network Steering Committee
(June 18, 2013) Judith Rutledge, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Network Steering Committee
(June 18, 2013) Peggy Moulder
(June 18, 2013) Paul Chomik
(June 18, 2013) Yasmin Virani
(June 18, 2013) Mary Bella, Secretary, Mimico Residents Association
(June 18, 2013) Peter Swinton, PMG Planning
(June 18, 2013) Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP
(June 18, 2013) Denise Harris, Heritage Officer, Etobicoke Historical Society
(June 18, 2013) Peter Riedel

Communications (Community Council)

(March 19, 2013) Letter from Yasmin Virani (EY.Main.EY25.15.1)
(March 18, 2013) Letter from Anna Kulinski (EY.Main.EY25.15.2)
(March 21, 2013) Letter from Peggy Moulder (EY.Main.EY25.15.3)
(March 27, 2013) Letter from Dr. Maureen Henderson, President, Mimico-by-the-Lake-Business Improvement Association (EY.Main.EY25.15.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35737.pdf
(March 28, 2013) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (EY.Main.EY25.15.5)
(March 29, 2013) E-mail from Carmen Chimenti (EY.Main.EY25.15.6)
(March 31, 2013) E-mail from Chris Kerrigan (EY.Main.EY25.15.7)
(April 1, 2013) E-mail from Licia Canton, President, and Jim Zucchero, Vice President, Association of Italian Canadian Writers (EY.Main.EY25.15.8)
(April 2, 2013) Letter from Ted Scott (EY.Main.EY25.15.9)
(April 2, 2013) Submission from W. Mark Thompson (EY.Main.EY25.15.10)
(April 3, 2013) Letter from Kyra Trainor, President, Mimico Residents Association (EY.Main.EY25.15.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35758.pdf
(April 4, 2013) E-mail from Greg Swiatek (EY.Main.EY25.15.12)
(April 5, 2013) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP (EY.Main.EY25.15.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35744.pdf
(April 5, 2013) Submission from Kyle Gojic, Vicki Bourgeois and Megan Norfolk, on behalf of CodeBlueWestTO Team (EY.Main.EY25.15.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35738.pdf
(April 5, 2013) Letter from Paul Chomik, EL Community Planning Group (EY.Main.EY25.15.15)
(April 8, 2013) E-mail from Michael Colvin (EY.Main.EY25.15.16)
(April 8, 2013) E-mail from Michael Harrison (EY.Main.EY25.15.17)
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Starr Smith (EY.Main.EY25.15.18)
(April 8, 2013) Letter from The Steering Committee, Ward 6 Community Action Team (EY.Main.EY25.15.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35768.pdf
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Peggy Moulder, Etobicoke Lakeshore Community Planning Group (EY.Main.EY25.15.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35745.pdf
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Timothy Dobson, The Steering Committee, Lakeshore Planning Council Corp. (EY.Main.EY25.15.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35746.pdf
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Stephen F. Waque, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (EY.Main.EY25.15.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35747.pdf
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Dorothy Wheeler (EY.Main.EY25.15.23)
(April 8, 2013) E-mail from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Rutledge (EY.Main.EY25.15.24)
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Larry Morassutti and Gerry DiLeo, Preview Technologies Inc. (EY.Main.EY25.15.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35749.pdf
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Dr. Maureen Henderson, Chair, Mimico by-the-Lake Business Improvement Association (EY.Main.EY25.15.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35750.pdf
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Kyle Gojic, Vicki Bourgeois, Megan Norfolk, on behalf of the CodeBlueWestTO team (EY.Main.EY25.15.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35762.pdf
(April 9, 2013) Letter from Brian Bailey, President, Citizens Concerned About the Future of the Etobicoke Waterfront (CCFEW) (EY.Main.EY25.15.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35751.pdf
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Jim Reekie, President, Humber Bay Shores Condominium Association (EY.Main.EY25.15.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35763.pdf
(April 9, 2013) E-mail from Marina Bertozzi (EY.Main.EY25.15.30)
(April 9, 2013) E-mail from Michael R. Wolfe (EY.Main.EY25.15.31)
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Dr. Maureen Henderson, Chair, Mimico by-the-Lake Business Improvement Association (EY.Main.EY25.15.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35766.pdf
(April 9, 2013) Letter from Kyra Trainor, President, Mimico Residents Association (EY.Main.EY25.15.33)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35760.pdf
(April 9, 2013) Submission from Peter Shepherd, Mimico Lakeshore Network (EY.Main.EY25.15.34)
(April 15, 2013) E-mail from Rita Snow (EY.Main.EY25.15.35)
(May 3, 2013) Letter from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Rutledge, Co-Chairs, Mimico Lakeshore Network Steering Committee (EY.Main.EY25.15.36)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-37825.pdf
(May 6, 2013) Submission from Kyle Gojic, on behalf of CodeBlueWestTO (EY.Main.EY25.15.37)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-37826.pdf
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Rutledge, Co-chairs Mimico Lakeshore Network (MLN) Steering Committee (EY.New.EY25.15.38)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38349.pdf
(June 14, 2013) Letter from Kyle Gojic, on behalf of the CodeBlueWestTO Team (EY.New.EY25.15.39)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38351.pdf
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Leigh Himel (EY.New.EY25.15.40)
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Yasmin Virani (EY.New.EY25.15.41)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Patrick O'Brien (EY.New.EY25.15.42)
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Kyra Trainor, President, Mimico Residents Association (EY.New.EY24.15.43)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38395.pdf
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Mary L. Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP (EY.New.Ey25.15.44)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38426.pdf
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Peggy Moulder, Etobicoke-Lakeshore Community Planning Group (EY.New.EY25.15.45)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38418.pdf
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP (EY.New.EY25.15.46)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38440.pdf
(June 13, 2013) Letter from Stephen F. Waque, Borden Ladner Gervais, LLP (EY.New.EY25.15.47)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38461.pdf
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Anastasia Jakubasz (EY.New.EY25.15.48)
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Kyle Gojic, on behalf of the CodeBlueWestTO Team (EY.New.EY25.15.49)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38463.pdf
(June 18, 2013) Letter from Kyle Gojic, on behalf of the CodeBlueWestTO Team (EY.New.EY25.15.50)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38560.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 20, 2013) Letter from Paul Chomik (CC.Main.EY25.15.51)
(July 10, 2013) Letter from Timothy Dobson, Chairman, Lakeshore Planning Council Corporation (CC.Supp.EY25.15.52)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39085.pdf
(July 12, 2013) Submission from Etobicoke Lakeshore Community Planning Group, submitted by Peggy Moulder (CC.Supp.EY25.15.53)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39086.pdf
(July 13, 2013) Letter from Rishi Sharma on behalf of the Executive, High Park Coalition (CC.Supp.EY25.15.54)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39090.pdf
(July 14, 2013) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Peter Baker, Co-Chairs, FoNTRA (CC.Supp.EY25.15.55)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39091.pdf
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Klaus and Marjut Dunker (CC.New.EY25.15.56)
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Effie Hotousiotis (CC.New.EY25.15.57)
(July 15, 2013) Submission from Peggy Moulder (CC.New.EY25.15.58)
(July 15, 2013) Letter from David M. Townley, President, South Rosedale Residents' Association (CC.New.EY25.15.59)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39122.pdf
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Davie Harrison, Chair, Annex Residents' Association (CC.New.EY25.15.60)
(July 15, 2013) Letter from Kyra Trainor, President, Mimico Residents Association (CC.New.EY25.15.61)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39124.pdf
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Phil Horgan, President, West Lansing Homeowners Association (CC.New.EY25.15.62)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39117.pdf
(July 15, 2013) Letter from Nicholas Singh, President, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association (CC.New.EY25.15.63)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39206.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Petition from CodeBlueWestTO (CC.New.EY25.15.64)
(July 16, 2013) Petition from CodeBlueWestTO (CC.New.EY25.15.65)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Harold Madi (CC.New.EY25.15.66)
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Marie Sydney (CC.New.EY25.15.67)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Kyle Gojic, On behalf of the CodeBlueWestTO Team (CC.New.EY25.15.68)
(July 13, 2013) E-mail from Dr. Michael Dales and A. Herwin (CC.New.EY25.15.69)
(July 11, 2013) E-mail from Rebecca Black (CC.New.EY25.15.70)
(July 18, 2013) E-mail from E L Cramp, Corresponding Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.EY25.15.71)

15a - Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan

Origin
(April 4, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

In the preparation of the draft Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan (the draft Secondary Plan), a geographic area within the larger Mimico community was identified for the purpose of outlining the potential catchment area for the provision of limited off-site rental replacement housing.  Map 33-8 of the draft Secondary Plan reflects this area.

 

Policies established in the draft Secondary Plan specifically state that any rental units replaced outside the Secondary Plan area are to be located where the proposed built form is otherwise permitted or determined to be suitable by the City.  The intent of the policy is to allow rental replacement off-site only in areas where residential uses are permitted.  In the case of Map 33-8, the potential rental replacement area included lands designated for Employment Uses under the City of Toronto Official Plan.  Given the City is currently undertaking an Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Review, it is not appropriate to identify these employment lands as potential replacement areas.  Accordingly, staff are recommending that Map 33-8 be modified to delete the Employment Areas as potential rental replacement locations, and that an updated map (Attachment 1) replace the map that is currently part of the draft Secondary Plan.  This will provide greater certainty in terms of identifying the area of potential limited off-site rental replacement housing.

Background Information (Community Council)
(April 4, 2013) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding the Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-59006.pdf

15b - Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan

Origin
(May 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

At its meeting of April 9, 2013, Etobicoke York Community Council held a Public Meeting on the Final Report for the Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan and deferred a decision to its June 18, 2013 meeting to provide Planning staff an opportunity to respond to the comments received at the Public Meeting.

 

The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of these oral and written submissions, and to outline the recommended amendments to the proposed Secondary Plan resulting from staff's review of this input.

 

This report recommends that the Final Report be approved with the recommended amendments to the proposed Secondary Plan as outlined in this report.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58831.pdf

15c - Supplementary Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan

Origin
(June 17, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

At its meeting of April 9, 2013, Etobicoke York Community Council held a Public Meeting on the Final Report for the Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan and deferred a decision to its June 18, 2013 meeting to provide Planning staff an opportunity to respond to the comments received at the Public Meeting.  A Supplementary Report, dated May 30, 2013, was submitted to the Etobicoke York Community Council to provide a summary of the oral and written submissions, and to outline the recommended amendments to the proposed Secondary Plan.

 

This report recommends further minor and technical amendments to the proposed draft Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 17, 2013) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding the Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-59624.pdf

EY25.16 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Lake Shore Boulevard West and Douglas Boulevard (Mimico Estates)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (EY25.16a with recommendations)
Communication EY25.16.20 has been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the following properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act:

 

a.         2523 Lake Shore Boulevard West ("Ormscliffe")

b.         2527 Lake Shore Boulevard West ("Ormscliffe")

c.         2533-2535 Lake Shore Boulevard West (Semi-Detached Houses)

d.         2539A&B Lake Shore Boulevard West (Garage)

e.         2541-2541A Lake Shore Boulevard West (Leonard Franceschini House)

f.          5, 7 and 9 Douglas Boulevard (Power Plant and Row Houses)

 

2.         If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.         If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the properties.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council considered the following Items together:

 

-           EY23.15, headed "Final Report - Mimico-by-the-Lake Secondary Plan"; and

 

-           EY23.16, headed "Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Lake Shore Boulevard West and Douglas Boulevard (Mimico Estates)".

Origin

(March 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act the properties listed in Recommendation No.1, which are located on the south side of Lake Shore Boulevard West, west of Douglas Boulevard, and at 5, 7 and 9 Douglas Boulevard.  The properties comprise the main residence and auxiliary buildings associated with the early 20th century Mimico Estates of A. B. Ormsby and James Franceschini.

 

The properties identified in Recommendation No. 1 are listed on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.  While the properties together compose the Mimico Estates, the buildings have been assigned individual street addresses.

 

The Mimico Estates are part of the area identified in Mimico 20/20, a revitalization action plan for the Mimico-by-the-Lake community that was initiated by the Etobicoke York Community Council in 2006.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding an Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Lake Shore Boulevard West and Douglas Boulevard (Mimico Estates)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-57490.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Lake Shore Boulevard West and Douglas Boulevard (Mimico Estates) - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act (EY26.16a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60286.pdf

Speakers

(April 9, 2013) Yasmin Virani
(April 9, 2013) Kyle Gojic, Code Blue West TO
(April 9, 2013) Peter Shepherd, Mimico Lakeshore Network
(April 9, 2013) Megan Norfolk
(April 9, 2013) Russ Ford, Executive Director, LAMP Community Health Centre
(April 9, 2013) Ted Scott
(April 9, 2013) Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP
(April 9, 2013) Kyra Trainor, President, Mimico Residents Association
(April 9, 2013) Victoria Bourgeois
(April 9, 2013) Paul Chomik
(April 9, 2013) Carolyn MacLeod, Ward 6 Community Action Team
(April 9, 2013) Starr Smith
(April 9, 2013) Denise Harris, Heritage Officer, Etobicoke Historical Society
(April 9, 2013) Irene Jones, Citizens Concerned about the Future of the Etobicoke Waterfront
(April 9, 2013) J. Craig Hunter
(April 9, 2013) Dr. Maureen Henderson, Chair, Mimico by-the-Lake Business Improvement Association
(April 9, 2013) Peter Swinton, PMG Planning
(April 9, 2013) Taylor Morassutti, One Superior Avenue Inc.
(April 9, 2013) Walter Maceluch
(April 9, 2013) Ruth Grier
(April 9, 2013) George Platsis
(June 18, 2013) Martin Gerwin, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Network Steering Committee
(June 18, 2013) Judith Rutledge, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Network Steering Committee
(June 18, 2013) Peggy Moulder
(June 18, 2013) Paul Chomik
(June 18, 2013) Yasmin Virani
(June 18, 2013) Mary Bella, Secretary, Mimico Residents Association
(June 18, 2013) Peter Swinton, PMG Planning
(June 18, 2013) Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP
(June 18, 2013) Denise Harris, Heritage Officer, Etobicoke Historical Society
(June 18, 2013) Peter Riedel

Communications (Community Council)

(March 27, 2013) E-mail from Peter D. Pellier (EY.Main.EY25.16.1)
(March 27, 2013) Letter from Massimo Pacetti, Member of Parliament for Saint-Léonard / Saint-Michel (EY.Main.EY25.16.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35826.pdf
(April 2, 2013) E-mail from Denise Harris, Etobicoke Historical Society (EY.Main.EY25.16.3)
(April 2, 2013) E-mail from James Geneau (EY.Main.EY25.16.4)
(April 2, 2013) Letter from Michael Harrison (EY.Main.EY25.16.5)
(April 1, 2013) E-mail from Licia Canton, President, and Jim Zucchero, Vice President, Association of Italian Canadian Writers (EY.Main.EY25.16.6)
(April 3, 2013) Letter from Susan Ratcliffe, President, Architectural Conservancy of Ontario (EY.Main.EY25.16.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35827.pdf
(April 4, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (EY.Main.EY25.16.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35829.pdf
(April 2, 2013) Letter from Michael A. Tibollo, President, National Congress of Italian Canadians (EY.Main.EY25.16.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35819.pdf
(April 6, 2013) E-mail from Molly Sutherland (EY.Main.EY25.16.10)
(April 6, 2013) E-mail from Sandy Eathorne (EY.Main.EY25.16.11)
(April 6, 2013) Letter from Art Drysdale, Secretary, Dunnington Grubb Foundation (EY.Main.EY25.16.12)
(April 8, 2013) E-mail from Jaan Pill (EY.Main.EY25.16.13)
(April 8, 2013) Letter from Peggy Moulder, Etobicoke-Lakeshore Community Planning Group (EY.Main.EY25.16.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-35821.pdf
(April 9, 2013) E-mail from Malcolm R. Archer (EY.Main.EY25.16.15)
(June 7, 2013) Letter from Michael Harrison (EY.New.EY25.16.16)
(June 12, 2013) Letter from James McCreath (EY.New.EY25.16.17)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Peggy Moulder, Etobicoke-Lakeshore Community Planning Group (EY.New.EY25.16.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38419.pdf
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP (EY.New.EY25.16.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38464.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 20, 2013) Letter from Paul Chomik (CC.Main.EY25.16.20)

EY25.17 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 150 Symes Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council include the property at 150 Symes Road (Symes Road Incinerator) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.

 

2.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 150 Symes Road (Symes Road Incinerator) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

Origin

(May 10, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 150 Symes Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  At its meeting of January 18, 2011, the Etobicoke York Community Council (EY3.37) directed Heritage Preservation Services to report on the heritage potential of the site, which contains the former Symes Road Incinerator (1933).  In 2009, the property was transferred to Build Toronto, which has sold the site.

 

Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the property at 150 Symes Road meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation under the Ontario Heritage Act.  The designation of the property would enable City Council to manage alterations to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 10, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division regarding an Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 150 Symes Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58639.pdf

17a - Toronto Preservation Board Recommendations - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 150 Symes Road

Origin
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2013 considered a report (May 10, 2013) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act – 150 Symes Road.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding 150 Symes Road - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58996.pdf

EY25.18 - General Report - 1450 St. Clair Avenue West - Approval Under the Funeral, Burial, and Cremation Services Act (Formerly the Cemeteries Act)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant approval of the proposal to increase the capacity of Prospect Cemetery at 1450 St. Clair Avenue West with a mausoleum expansion containing approximately 1,648 crypts, subject to:

 

a.         a statement of Site Plan Approval being issued by the Director of Community Planning, Etobicoke York District; and

 

b.         the owner paying for the cost of publishing the “Notice of Decision” of Council’s approval in a local newspaper.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Clerk, subsequent to Council’s approval of the proposal and under the requirements of the Funeral, Burial, and Cremation Services Act to:

 

a.         publish the “Notice of Decision” of Council’s approval of the mausoleum expansion in a local newspaper; and

 

b.         send a copy of City Council’s decision to the applicant and the Registrar, Ministry of Consumer Services, Cemeteries Regulation Unit. 

 

3.         City Council direct that the landscaping and street furniture upgrades as approved by area residents at the May 25, 2013 Community Consultation meeting, be incorporated in the Landscape Drawings to be approved through Site Plan Approval.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This report recommends that City Council grant approval under the Funeral, Burial, and Cremation Services Act (formerly the Cemeteries Act) to permit expansion of the existing Garden Court Mausoleum in Prospect Cemetery at 1450 St. Clair Avenue West.  The mausoleum is located in the southwest portion of the cemetery along the St. Clair Avenue West frontage. 

 

The application proposes to add a third floor to the existing two storey mausoleum and to make internal alterations to the first and second storeys. The proposed expansion would add approximately 2,599 m2 of new floor area and 1,648 crypts.  The mausoleum's exterior walls are to be retained.  The proposed addition includes a roof that would enclose a portion of the mausoleum's outdoor courtyard

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Approval Under the Funeral, Burial, and Cremation Services Act (Formerly the Cemeteries Act) - General Report - 1450 St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58691.pdf

EY25.19 - Public Art Plan - 1844 Bloor Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 1844 Bloor West - Public Art Plan attached to the report dated May 29, 2013, from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 1844 Bloor Street West - Public Art Plan. The plan has been prepared by the proponent's consultant in compliance with the development approval provisions. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on the development site.

 

The proposed development consists of a 14 storey mixed-use building located on the north side of Bloor Street West, north of High Park between Pacific Avenue and Oakmount Road. The site is on an Avenue and within an Apartment Neighbourhood that extends to the north, east and west with Neighbourhoods also to the east. The development consists of a U-shaped courtyard building with a plaza fronting Bloor Street West. The art is proposed to be on private property within the plaza and highly visible and accessible from the street frontage.

 

The 1844 Bloor Street West - Public Art Plan provides a framework for a public art commission including the introduction, site context, specified opportunities for public art sites, art site requirements, competition process, jury, art selection process, estimated budget and schedule of the works.

 

The attached plan meets the objectives of the City's Percent for Public Art Program and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design regarding 1844 Bloor Street West - Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58832.pdf

EY25.29 - Lane Designation - Milvan Drive at Finch Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West
Attention
Bills 1052 and 1053 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the designation of the westerly southbound lane on Milvan Drive for right turning vehicles only, from Finch Avenue West to a point 30 metres further north.

Origin

(May 2, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to designate the most westerly southbound lane on Milvan Drive at Finch Avenue West for right turn movements only.

 

The implementation of the lane designation will improve the flow of traffic on Milvan Drive/Rumike Road and through the intersection by providing motorists with clearly defined permitted traffic movements and mitigate conflicts between through and turning traffic.

 

Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on Milvan Drive, City Council approval of this report is required. The TTC has been consulted on this item and they do not object to the regulations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 2, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding a Lane Designation - Milvan Drive at Finch Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58735.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58736.pdf

EY25.38 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 353/383 Humberline Drive; 1608 The Queensway; 10 Martha Eaton Way

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 12 - York South-Weston
Attention
Bill 1124 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 – Fire Routes:

 

            -           353/383 Humberline Drive

            -           1608 The Queensway

            -           10 Martha Eaton Way.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report from Toronto Fire Services regarding the designation of fire routes at 353/383 Humberline Drive; 1608 The Queensway; 10 Martha Eaton Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58812.pdf
Draft By-law to amend Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to include 353/383 Humberline Drive; 1608 The Queensway; 10 Martha Eaton Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58813.pdf

EY25.39 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 205 Sherway Gardens Drive, 1100 Islington Avenue West, 30 Weston Road and 2300 Finch Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 11 - York South-Weston
Attention
Bill 1125 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 – Fire Routes:

 

            -           205 Sherway Gardens Drive

            -           1100 Islington Avenue West

            -           30 Weston Road (encompassing buildings L1G, L1I, L1H, L1J, L1M, L1N, L1D, L1L, L1B/L2B, L1F/L2F, L1A/L2A at the address of 30 Weston Road)

            -           2300 Finch Avenue West.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report from Toronto Fire Services, regarding the designation of fire routes at 205 Sherway Gardens Drive, 1100 Islington Avenue West, 30 Weston Road and 2300 Finch Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58814.pdf
Draft By-law to amend Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes to include 205 Sherway Gardens Drive, 1100 Islington Avenue West, 30 Weston Road and 2300 Finch Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-58815.pdf

EY25.41 - Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
2 - Etobicoke North, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 12 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Communication EY25.41.8 has been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests for:

 

1.          The 16th Annual Taste of the Kingsway Festival:

 

              a.       to be held on Bloor Street West, from Prince Edward Drive to Montgomery Road, on:

 

              -         Friday, September 6, 2013 from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

              -         Saturday, September 7, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 

              -         Sunday, September 8, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 

 

              b.       to operate two Beer and Wine Gardens on Bloor Street West, one east of Montgomery Road and the other west of Prince Edward Drive; and

 

              c.       for temporary liquor license extensions for various Kingsway BIA member businesses, as listed in the letter (April 30, 2013) from Cathy Beaulieu, Chair, Kingsway BIA, during event hours of the Taste of the Kingsway Festival.

 

2.         The erection of a tent for the sampling and promotion of wine at the Corso Italia "Grapevine Festival", to be held on Saturday, September 21, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on St. Clair Avenue West, between Dufferin Street and Lansdowne Avenue.  The tent will be located on the event space, which will be barricaded and have uniformed security working at all times.

 

3.         An extended patio permit for the annual customer appreciation event at Da House of Jerk on Sunday, July 28, 2013, from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., at 680 Rexdale Boulevard, Units 19 and 20.

 

4.         An extension of hours for liquor licensing purposes at the following establishments, as early as 10:00 a.m. and as late as 4:00 a.m. during the fourth annual Toronto Beer Week Festival, to be held from September 13 to 21, 2013:

 

             -           1793777 Ontario Ltd., 3030 Dundas Street West; and

             -           Taste of Portuguese Cuisine, 2888 Lakeshore Boulevard West.

 

             5.        The placement of a tent(s) for the sampling and promotion of wine on event space which will be barricaded and have uniformed security working at all times, as part of the Emery Village Business Improvement Area Wine Festival, to be held on Saturday, September 14, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Plunkett Road, between Millwick and Satterly Road, and on Satterly Road, between Islington Avenue and Plunkett Road.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council:

 

A.        Declared, for liquor licensing purposes, the following events to be of municipal significance, and directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised that the Community Council has no objection to them taking place:

 

1.         The 16th Annual Taste of the Kingsway Festival, to be held on Bloor Street West, from Prince Edward Drive to Montgomery Road, on:

 

            -           Friday, September 6, 2013 from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

-           Saturday, September 7, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 

-           Sunday, September 8, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. 

 

            2.         The Annual Festival of Our Lady of Light, to be held by St. Matthew’s Roman Catholic Church at the St. Matthew's School playground, from August 30 to September 2, 2013, from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m.

 

            3.         The fundraising barbeque and dance in support of a Soccer Team Club, to be held on Sunday, July 14, 2013, from 2:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. at 130 Queen's Plate Drive.

 

            4.         The Corso Italia "Grapevine Festival", to be held on Saturday, September 21, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on St. Clair Avenue West, between Dufferin Street and Lansdowne Avenue.

 

            5.         The Emery Village Business Improvement Area Wine Festival, to be held on Saturday, September 14, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Plunkett Road, between Millwick and Satterly Road, and on Satterly Road, between Islington Avenue and Plunkett Road. 

Summary

Seeking endorsement of various events for liquor licensing purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(April 30, 2013) Letter from Cathy Beaulieu, Chair, Kingsway BIA regarding the 16th Annual Taste of The Kingsway Festival - September 6 - 8, 2013. (EY.Main.EY25.41.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-37692.pdf
(May 3, 2013) Letter from Rev. Andre Grecki, St. Matthew's Church, regarding the Annual Festival of Our Lady of Light, August 30 to September 2, 2013. (EY.Main.EY25.41.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-37693.pdf
(June 11, 2013) Fax from Sonya Morris and Wayne Green regarding a fundraising BBQ and Dance for a Soccer Team Club on July 14, 2013. (EY.New.EY25.41.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38252.pdf
(June 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio regarding the Corso Italia "Grapevine Festival" on September 21, 2013. (EY.New.EY25.41.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38295.pdf
(June 12, 2013) Letter from Wendy Ellington regarding Da House of Jerk annual customer appreciation event on July 28 and 29, 2013. (EY.New.EY25.41.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38323.pdf
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from George Milbrandt, Chair Toronto Beer Week, advising of additional participating establishments (EY.New.EY25.41.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38355.pdf
(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Ward 7 - York West, regarding the Emery Village BIA Wine Festival on September 14, 2013. (EY.New.EY25.41.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-38465.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Claudette McDonald, Vice President, Caribbean Promotions Arts and Culture Inc. with respect to a Beer Garden in conjunction with the Annual Jerk Food Festival (JerkFest) on August 10 and 11, 2013 at the foot of the ski hills at Centennial Park. (CC.Main.EY25.41.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39003.pdf

EY25.44 - Introduction of On-street Parking Permits - Cordella Avenue, between Weston Road and Louvain Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant an exemption to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 925 - Permit Parking, in order to allow a second poll of the residents of Cordella Avenue, between Weston Road, and Louvain Street, to determine support for the introduction of on-street parking permits.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, to request Registry Services, City Clerk's Office, to conduct the poll.

 

3.         City Council request that the poll be completed prior to October 17, 2013 for the implementation of permit parking.

Origin

(June 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Frances Nunziata, Ward 11, York South-Weston

Summary

At a public meeting held at Beech Hall on Wednesday, May 22, 2013, the residents of Cordella Avenue, between Weston Road and Louvain Street, submitted a request to have City staff conduct a poll to determine if the residents of Cordella Avenue support the introduction of on-street parking permits on their street.

 

An earlier poll conducted in February, 2012, did not favour the addition of on-street parking; however the residents have asserted that the poll was not accurate because outdated residential information may have been used. Under the terms of Chapter 925 of the Municipal Code, another poll cannot be conducted until March, 2014, which is two years after closing of the original poll.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Frances Nunziata regarding the introduction of On-Street Parking Permits on Cordella Avenue, between Weston Road and Louvain Street.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-59573.pdf

EY25.50 - Outdoor Liquor License Application - 1474 St. Clair Avenue West - Glamour Bar

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Glamour Bar, 1474 St. Clair Avenue West (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to Council's decision, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio, Ward 17 - Davenport

Summary

An application for an outdoor liquor licence has been made to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for the premise at 1474 St. Clair Avenue West operating under the name Glamour Bar (the “Premises”).

 

For the past few months, residents have been kept awake over most weekends, public holidays and long weekends due to loud music emanating from this establishment. Since the restaurant opened, it has been operating similar to a nightclub rather than a restaurant or bar. 

 

Currently, ongoing problems include loud music, crowd control, loitering, urinating in public, fights, patron's double parking and blasting music from their vehicles and people drinking outside the premises. These are all very serious issues that the nearby residents should not have to endure and will only get worse if an outside patio with a liquor license is granted. 

 

The Premises is located in very close proximity to residential properties and there is great concern that the establishment will be very disruptive for residents in the area. This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest and must be turned down.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 11, 2013) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio regarding an Outdoor Liquor License Application - 1474 St. Clair Avenue West - Glamour Bar
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-59640.pdf
Submission from Councillor Cesar Palacio, forwarding 24 signed form letters regarding the Glamour Bar, 1474 St. Clair Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-59778.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 25

NY25.5 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property - 3 Chedington Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
The Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY25.5b with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the request to demolish the designated heritage property at 3 Chedington Place in accordance with Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit;

 

i.          The owner shall arrange for a heritage plaque on the subject property and within the public view through the Heritage Toronto Plaques and Markers Program that commemorates the lost heritage resource at 3 Chedington Place to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council enact a by-law to repeal Designation By-law No. 32307.

Origin

(May 10, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that Council approve the demolition of a designated heritage property under Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 

 

The proposal is to demolish the existing 2½ storey Tudor Revival building at 3 Chedington Place.  In October 2009, a fire damaged a large portion of the interior and roof of the building. Water damage related to extinguishing the fire and subsequent exposure to the elements over several winters has further contributed to the overall damage incurred.  The extent of the deterioration makes rehabilitation no longer a viable option.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 10, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division on Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property at 3 Chedington Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58773.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 5, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building on Residential Demolition Application for 3 Chedington Place (NY25.5b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60138.pdf

5a - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property - 3 Chedington Place

Origin
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2013, considered a report (May 10, 2013) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property – 3 Chedington Place.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 31, 2013) Letter from Toronto Preservation Board on Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property at 3 Chedington Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59124.pdf

NY25.6 - Payment-In-Lieu of Parking - 416 Eglinton Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council exempt the applicant at 416 Eglinton Avenue West from the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law parking requirement of eight parking spaces, subject to a $20,000.00 payment-in-lieu of parking, providing the applicant signs a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Origin

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

This report seeks Council's approval to exempt the applicant from the parking requirement specified in the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to provide eight parking spaces (four spaces for the residential component and four spaces for the office component).  Instead of accommodating the parking on-site, the applicant has requested a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking to the City which amounts to $20,000.00.

 

The parking exemption is considered appropriate since the eight space shortfall will not have a significant impact on parking conditions in the area.  As the City's Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Policy can only be considered for the non-residential component of mixed-use developments, only four of the eight parking spaces will be subject to Payment-In-Lieu.

 

Section 40 of the Planning Act grants Council the authority to approve payment-in-lieu of parking.  This application has been made pursuant to the City’s Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Policy, adopted in July 2004. City Council approval is required as this matter has not been delegated.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Payment-In-Lieu of Parking at 416 Eglinton Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59085.pdf
Attachment 1 - Context Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59106.pdf
Attachment 2 - Applicant's Site Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59107.pdf
Attachment 3 - Applicant's Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59108.pdf

NY25.10 - Turn Restrictions - Eglinton Avenue West at Glenholme Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bills 1026 and 1027 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of a northbound through prohibition, anytime, at the intersection of Eglinton Avenue West and Glenholme Avenue.

 

2.         City Council approve the installation of a southbound through prohibition, anytime, at the intersection of Eglinton Avenue West and Glenholme Avenue.

 

3.         City Council approve the installation of a southbound right turn prohibition when the traffic control signal shows red at the intersection of Eglinton Avenue West and Glenholme Avenue.

Origin

(May 14, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Eglinton Avenue West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval for the installation of a north and southbound through movement prohibition and a southbound right turn on red movement prohibition at the intersection of Eglinton Avenue West and Glenholme Avenue.

 

As part the development agreement, Application 10 100935 NNY 15 SA, the applicant 1674 Eglinton Inc. was required to complete relevant driveway access improvements at the intersection of Eglinton Avenue West and Glenholme Avenue to facilitate the inclusion of the driveway as part of the existing signalized intersection.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 14, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Turn Restrictions at Eglinton Avenue West at Glenholme Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59116.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Turn Restrictions - Eglinton Avenue West at Glenholme Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59117.pdf

NY25.11 - Through Traffic Prohibition - Lawrence Avenue West and Allen Road (East Intersection)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bills 1028 and 1029 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of through traffic prohibition at any time on Allen Road Northbound On-Ramp at Lawrence Avenue West and Allen Road (East Intersection) with 'Transit Vehicles Excepted' tab.

Origin

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Lawrence Avenue West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to prohibit northbound through traffic at any time to Allen Road northbound On-Ramp at Lawrence Avenue West and Allen Road (East Intersection) with 'Transit Vehicles Excepted' tab and to designate the westerly northbound lane on Lawrence Avenue West for right turns only.

 

The implementation of the through traffic prohibition from the northbound off ramp will  facilitate the implementation of the appropriate traffic control signal adjustments at this intersection to improve the flow of westbound right turn movement at this intersection.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District on Through Traffic Prohibition at Lawrence Avenue West and Allen Road (East Intersection)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59072.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Through Traffic Prohibition - Lawrence Avenue West at Allen Road (East Intersection)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59073.pdf

NY25.13 - Pedestrian Crossing Prohibition - Eglinton Avenue West at Marlee Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bills 1024 and 1025 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of a pedestrian crossing prohibition on Eglinton Avenue West between the west curb line of Marlee Avenue and a point 30.5 metres east of the east curb line of Marlee Avenue.

Origin

(May 14, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Eglinton Avenue West and Marlee Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval for the installation of a pedestrian crossing prohibition on the east leg of the intersection of Eglinton Avenue West and Marlee Avenue.

 

The installation of the pedestrian crossing prohibition on the east leg of the intersection will address the residents’ concern regarding pedestrian disobeyance with the existing signage.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 14, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District on Pedestrian Crossing Prohibition at Eglinton Avenue West at Marlee Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58950.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Eglinton Avenue West at Marlee Avenue - Pedestrian Prohibition
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58951.pdf

NY25.24 - Parking Prohibition - Grenoble Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bills 1037 and 1054 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that: 

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of No Parking, Anytime, on the west side of Grenoble Drive between Vendome Place/Grenoble Drive and Spanbridge Drive.

Origin

(May 13, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Grenoble Drive City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to amend the existing parking regulations on the west side of Grenoble Drive in order to prohibit parking at anytime between Vendome Place/Grenoble Drive and Spanbridge Road.

 

Amendments to the existing parking regulations will address the Toronto Transit Commission's (TTC) concern regarding the difficulty of TTC buses manoeuvring between parked vehicles on Grenoble Drive at the above noted location.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 13, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District on Parking Prohibition at Grenoble Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58963.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Parking Prohibition - Grenoble Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58964.pdf

NY25.25 - Time Limit Parking and Stopping Prohibitions - Laird Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bills 1055 and 1056 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the deletion of No Parking, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the west side of Laird Drive between Eglinton Avenue and Millwood Road.

 

2.         City Council approve the deletion of No Stopping, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the east side of Laird Drive between Eglinton Avenue East and Millwood Road.

 

3.         City Council approve the deletion of No Stopping, 4:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, on the east side of Laird Drive between Kenrae Road and a point approximately 100 metres north of Commercial Road.

 

4.         City Council approve the deletion of No Stopping, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the west side of Laird Drive from a point 71 metres north of Lea Avenue and Eglinton Avenue East.

 

5.         City Council approve the deletion of No Stopping, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays, on the west side of Laird Drive between Millwood Road and a point 64 metres north of Lea Avenue.

 

6.         City Council approve the installation of No Stopping, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on both sides of Laird Drive between Eglinton Avenue East and Millwood Road.

 

7.         City Council approve the installation of parking for a maximum period of 30 minutes from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Laird Drive between Markham Avenue and a point 71 metres north of Lea Avenue.

 

8.         City Council approve the installation of parking for a maximum period of 30 minutes from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Laird Drive between Lea Avenue and a point 64 metres north.

Origin

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Laird Drive City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to prohibit stopping from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on both sides of Laird Drive from Eglinton Avenue East to Millwood Road and to approve parking for maximum periods of 30 minutes from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the west side of Laird Drive from Lea Avenue to Markham Avenue.

 

Amendments to the parking and stopping regulations will address the concerns of local business' regarding on-street parking turnover on Laird Drive and will improve the flow of traffic during the peak volume periods.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District on Time Limit Parking and Stopping Prohibitions at Laird Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59083.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Time Limit Parking - Laird Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59084.pdf

NY25.28 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 3595 Keele Street and 45 Esander Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
8 - York West, 26 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 1127 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes – 3595 Keele Street and 45 Esander Drive.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services on Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes for 3595 Keele Street and 45 Esander Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58628.pdf
Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58629.pdf

NY25.30 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications NY25.30.2 to NY25.30.5 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following request for:

 

a.         A temporary liquor licence extension for Caribana Weekend Soca Festivities at the Hickory House Restaurant & Tavern and adjacent outdoor areas at 440 McNicoll Avenue on Friday, August 2; Saturday, August 3; and Sunday, August 4, 2013, from 10:30 p.m. to 4:30 a.m. on each of those dates; and on Monday, August 5, 2013, from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events for Municipal Significance for liquor licensing purposes

Communications (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Letter from Veron Styliadis, Hickory House Restaurant & Tavern, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for the Caribana Weekend Soca Festivities be to held on Friday, August 2; Saturday, August 3; and Sunday, August 4, 2013, from 10:30 p.m. to 4:30 a.m. on each of those dates; and on Monday, August 5, 2013, from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. at the Hickory House Restaurant & Tavern at 440 McNicoll Avenue. (NY.Main.NY25.30.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-37818.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 28, 2013) Letter from Al Salomon, President, Marigolds & Onions, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for the Rogers Cup to be held on Saturday August 3, to Monday August 12, 2013. (CC.Main.NY25.30.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-38990.pdf
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Vernon Stiliadis, Hickory House Restaurant and Tavern, regarding the Caribana Weekend Soca Event at the Hickory House Restaurant (CC.New.NY25.30.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39125.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Letter from Albert Bain, Manager, Orange Snail Restaurant, requesting a temporary liquor licence extension for an event at the York University, on July 24, 2013 (CC.New.NY25.30.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39139.pdf
(June 25, 2013) Letter from Gina Humilde, Event Coordinator, Black Creek Pioneer Village regarding a liquor licence extension for a corporate event hosted by The Toronto Ultimate Club on the Town Hall Green on July 27, 2013. (CC.New.NY25.30.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39150.pdf

NY25.38 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 206 and 208 Finch Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Zoning By-law 7625 for the former City of North York substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, after amending Part 2(i) under Exception Regulations to read as follows:

 

"i.        The maximum building height shall be 10.15 metres and/or 3 storeys, whichever is the lesser, and the height of any part of the building shall not exceed 70% of the horizontal distance separating that part of the building from the northern property line."

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council approve in-principle the site plan as indicated on the drawings and conditions listed in Attachment 9 of the report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

4.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or her designate, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to give final approval to the site plan when the conditions to be satisfied prior to site plan approval as set out in Attachment 9 of the report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, have been fulfilled.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The applicant proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, to permit the redevelopment of the properties at 206 and 208 Finch Avenue West with eight 3-storey residential townhouse units, with 16 parking spaces served by a shared private rear driveway. There is a concurrent site plan application to implement the proposal.

 

The proposal provides for a multiple-unit residential use that will enhance the vibrancy and active nature of the Finch Avenue streetscape consistent with the objectives of the Central Finch Area Secondary Plan. The proposed development reinforces the existing and planned built form context along Finch Avenue West and the building design will contribute to and enhance the public realm. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application and approval in principle of the Site Plan Application subject to the conditions outlined in this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Final Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications for 206 and 208 Finch Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58868.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 16, 2013) E-mail from George Belza on behalf of Edithvale-Yonge Community Association (NY.New.NY25.38.1)

NY25.40 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 2270-2280 Eglinton Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bill 1101 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend former City of York Zoning By-law 1-83, for the lands at 2270-2280 Eglinton Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment No. 5 in the final report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the following amendment:

 

a.         That the road widening along the 2280 Eglinton Avenue West frontage shown on Schedule 16(444) be modified from 0.44 metres to 0.40 metres.

 

2.         City Council direct the Acting Director, Transportation Services to exclude 2270 – 2280 Eglinton Avenue West from the permit parking inventory on Sanderstead Avenue and amend all related by-laws accordingly.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013 and notice was give in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 for the lands at 2270-2280 Eglinton Avenue West to permit the development of a seven (7) storey mid-rise rental apartment building with 14 at grade parking spaces.  The proposed building would contain 29 dwelling units with 156 m2 of at-grade commercial uses at a density of 3.0 FSI. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 2270-2280 Eglinton Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58879.pdf

NY25.41 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 458 Oakwood Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bill 1130 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 1-83, for the lands at 458 Oakwood Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached to the report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, as Attachment No. 7, with the following amendments:

 

a)         That the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment be modified in order to provide for the securing of a community benefit representing a $17,000 contribution to the City for the installation of public realm improvements and/or murals, within the Oakwood Avenue Arts District, generally defined as the east and west sides of Oakwood Avenue, extending from Strader Avenue in the north to Earlsdale Avenue in the south, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

b)         Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the community benefit described in Recommendation 1 (a);

 

c)         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director to amend the existing Site Plan Agreement registered on title to delete the requirement for the submission of a financial guarantee of $6,750.00 to secure provision of a mural on the north elevation of the building at 458 Oakwood; and

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The application proposes that the By-law permit a four-storey building with eight residential or artist live-work units and four parking spaces that is currently under construction at 458 Oakwood Avenue.  The current Zoning By-law permits a three-storey building having a maximum of six residential or artist live-work units. This report recommends amendments to Section 16(433) of Zoning By-law No. 1-83 which was established through By-Law 401-2009, enacted by City Council on April 6, 2009.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Final Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 458 Oakwood Ave
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58869.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) E-mail from John-Emil Surkos (NY.Main.NY25.41.1)
(May 29, 2013) E-mail from Kenton Kroker (NY.Main.NY25.41.2)

NY25.42 - Final Report - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 5182-5192, 5200 and 5218 Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
Communication NY25.42.2 has been submitted on this Item

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 5182-5192, 5200 and 5218 Yonge Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 15 to report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and revised, as necessary, in accordance with Recommendation No. 4(a)(ix) below.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 7625,  for the lands at 5182-5192, 5200 and 5218 Yonge Street,  substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 16 to report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and revised, as necessary, in accordance with Recommendation No. 4(a)(ix) below.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

           

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

           

i.          a minimum of 1,268 square metres of street related retail and service commercial uses located on the ground floor along the Yonge Street frontage, and is to include street related retail and service commercial uses located at grade within 30 metres of the property line and are directly accessible from the street;

 

ii.         an at grade bicycle room containing a total minimum of 37 bicycle parking spaces for the residential uses and a minimum of 4 bicycle parking spaces for the commercial uses, located on the ground floor accessible from the outside and having a minimum area of 85 square metres;

 

iii.        a minimum of 1.5 square metres per dwelling unit of indoor amenity space;

 

iv.        a monetary contribution in the form of a certified cheque to fund 2,836 square metres of proposed gross floor area, toward the provision of public recreation centres and social facilities and/or toward the cost of constructing and furnishing such facilities and/or toward the cost of the City acquiring lands necessary for the completion of planned service roads and associated road network and buffer areas in the North York Centre, and which shall be indexed upwardly to the Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch Index from the date of the Section 37 Agreement execution. The amount of the monetary contribution shall be equal to the market value, based on land value, of 2,836 square metres of proposed gross floor area, as determined by the Director of Real Estate Services and provided to the City prior to the issuance of the first building permit;

 

v.         a density incentive of 2,180 square metres in return for the provision of a minimum of 545 square metres of the City retail space component of the Social Facility Space;

 

vi.        a density incentive of 208 square metres in return for the provision of a minimum of 52 square metres of the community space component of the Social Facility Space;

 

vii.       the provision of a minimum of 545 square metres of Social Facility Space for the City retail space, fronting on an east-west publicly accessible mews, substantially in accordance with the Draft Term Sheet attached as Attachment 17 and any further amendments as deemed appropriate by the Director of Real Estate, in consultation with the local Councillor;

 

viii.      the provision of a minimum of 52 square metres of Social Facility Space for the community space, for the use of a community association to be determined to the satisfaction of the Director of Real Estate Services in consultation with the local Councillor, substantially in accordance with the Draft Term Sheet attached as Attachment 17 and any further amendments as deemed appropriate by the Director of Real Estate in consultation with the local Councillor; and

 

ix.        at the option of the Director of Real Estate Services in consultation with the local councillor, the owner shall not be required to provide the 52 square metre community space component of the Social Facility referred to in Recommendation No. 4 (a) (viii), in which case the owner shall not be entitled to the density incentive of 208 square metres referred to in Recommendation No. 4 (a) (vi), but instead shall be required to make an additional monetary contribution in the form of a certified cheque to fund an additional 260 square metres of proposed gross floor area on the same terms and conditions as set out in Recommendation 4 (a) (iv).

 

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.          the owner shall satisfactorily address Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) requirements regarding a TTC Technical Review, as indicated in their letter dated March 23, 2012;

 

ii.         the owner shall convey the property at 47 Princess Avenue to the City for park purposes prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, or prior, as agreed upon by the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, with such conveyance deemed to fully satisfy the parkland contribution requirements for the development, and with the details of timing of transfer and completion of works to be determined in consultation with Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the local Councillor;

 

iii.        the owner shall provide a public access easement in favour of the City over the publicly accessible mews and driveway, and all other required easements, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, in consultation with the applicable City departments; and

 

iv.        the owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee.

 

c.         the following servicing matters be addressed to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Development Services:

 

i.          a sanitary sewer analysis to identify any required improvements to the existing sanitary sewer system to provide for peak sanitary flows generated by the prposed development; and

 

ii.         hydrant flow analysis.

 

5.         City Council approve in principle the Draft Term Sheet attached as Attachment 17 to the report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and  revised, as necessary, in accordance with Recommendation 4(a)(ix) above, regarding the provision of Social Facility Space and the Publicly Accessible Mews, subject to any further amendments as deemed appropriate by the Director of Real Estate in consultation with the local Councillor, and the terms be incorporated into the Section 37 agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The applications propose to amend the North York Centre Secondary Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 35-storey mixed-use commercial and residential building (117.7 metres high) with 374 residential units and 5,575 square metres of non-residential gross floor area.  The development will provide Social Facility Space including 545 square metres of City retail space and 52 square metres of community space proposed at the north end of the building.  A publicly accessible open space mews is also proposed along the north side of the building adjacent to the City retail space.

 

The proposal provides for a mix of uses, including Social Facility Space that will increase the diversity, vitality and interest of the North York Centre consistent with the objectives of the North York Centre Secondary Plan. The proposed development reinforces the existing and planned built form context along Yonge Street in this area, and the building design and proposed open space amenity areas will contribute to and enhance the public realm. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Final Report and Attachments 1-17 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 5182-5192, 5200 and 5218 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58890.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) Letter from Ching Yin (NY.Main.NY25.42.1)

Communications (City Council)

(June 25, 2013) E-mail from Heshmat Saberi (CC.Main.NY25.42.2)

NY25.43 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 50 and 52 Neptune Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff to oppose the application in its current form to amend the Zoning By-law for the reasons outlined in the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant respecting a revised application which addresses the outstanding issues identified in this report, including but not limited to: height, density, massing, and shadow impact of the proposed building, parking supply, appropriate rental replacement that provides rental units of similar size to the existing rental units, an acceptable Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, and if necessary, City staff seek further instructions from City Council.

 

3.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the Ontario Municipal Board of City Council's position that:

 

a.         Any redevelopment of the lands must also include the full replacement of the 24 existing rental dwelling units and a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, including the right of tenants to return to the new rental units in accordance with the Official Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; and

 

b.         If the proposal for the replacement rental units is not substantially revised to meet the intent of the Official Plan by providing for the same unit types and comparable sizes as the existing rental units, that an Official Plan Amendment application is required.

 

4.         In the event the Ontario Municipal Board allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Board withhold any Order to approve the Zoning By-law Amendment application for the subject lands until such time as the City and the Owner have presented to the Board a Draft Zoning By-Law that secures the rental housing matters as outlined in Recommendation 3 above and a Section 37 Agreement addressing matters as outlined in this report, have been provided to the satisfaction of the City.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes to amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit the construction of an 11 storey (35m) condominium building and rental replacement with 169 residential units, 14,202 m2 of Gross Floor Area and a site density of 5.04. The development includes 24 rental units proposed on the ground and second floor levels.

 

The subject Zoning By-law Amendment application was appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on December 19, 2012. A Pre-Hearing Conference is scheduled for June 5, 2013. A full hearing date is scheduled for September 9th to 13th, 2013.

 

An associated Rental Housing Demolition application (File 09 200499 NNY 00 RH) has also been submitted to demolish the 24 existing residential rental units located at 50-52 Neptune Drive. The 24 units would be replaced in the new development, with affected tenants receiving relocation assistance and being able to return to the new replacement units.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s direction on the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board. It is Staff's opinion the proposal is not appropriate in its current form for the reasons set out in this report. The rental replacement and tenant relocation assistance matters are not acceptable as currently proposed and do not meet the intent of the Official Plan.

 

Staff are recommending that the Zoning By-law Amendment application in its current form be opposed at the OMB.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) Request for Direction Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 50 and 52 Neptune Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-58934.pdf

Speakers

Monty Mazin
Brenda Cantar, President, 3636 Bathurst Street Tenants Association
Miriam Steinberg

Communications (Community Council)

(June 13, 2013) Letter from Chris Singh, Permits Officer, Ministry of Transportation (NY.New.NY25.43.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-38458.pdf
(June 17, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the applicant (NY.New.NY25.43.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-38503.pdf
(June 18, 2013) Submission from Monty Mazin (NY.New.NY25.43.3)

NY25.48 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 233 Dawlish Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor  to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse the minor variances related to 233 Dawlish Avenue (A234/13NY) and to retain outside consultants, as necessary.

Origin

(June 13, 2013) Memo from Councillor Robinson

Summary

An application for minor variances related to the property known as 233 Dawlish Avenue was heard by the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment on May 8, 2013.

 

The application entailed the demolition of the existing property and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling.  The applicant sought variances related to height, the balcony area and the front yard setback.

 

The Committee of Adjustment refused the variance application.  The applicant appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.  The community has voiced significant concerns about the impact of these variances, if approved, on the neigbourhood.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 13, 2013) Memo from Councillor Robinson on Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 233 Dawlish Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59576.pdf
Attachment - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 233 Dawlish Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59577.pdf

NY25.49 - Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 268 Hollywood Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and an outside planner to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the lot severance and associated variances.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Memo from Councillor Filion

Summary

Applications for Consent and Minor Variance were submitted by Eskander Azadi, to permit the severance of the subject property into two residential building lots and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling on each of the proposed lots.

 

On May 8th, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment refused the consent applications on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it was to be subdivided was not demonstrated, and the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots was not demonstrated. The associated variances were refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor.

 

The current property owner, Eskander Azadi, has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2013) Memo from Councillor Filion on Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 268 Hollywood Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59616.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decisions - Consent and Minor Variance Applications - 268 Hollywood Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59617.pdf
Attachment 2 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Application for 268 Hollywood Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59618.pdf
Attachment 3 - Public Hearing Notice - Consent and Minor Variance Applications - 268 Hollywood Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59619.pdf

NY25.51 - Request for City Solicitor to attend Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 8 Forest Wood

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Communication NY25.51.1 has been submitted on this item

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Memo from Councillor Stintz

Summary

On May 23, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment refused an application to permit the construction of a new three-storey dwelling with an integral, at grade, one car garage. The existing dwelling would be demolished.

 

Requested Variance(s) to the North York Zoning By-law No. 7625

 

1.         Existing/proposed lot area of 609.94m²

2.         Proposed lot coverage of 41.53% of the lot area (which includes the rear excavated porch)

3.         Proposed front yard setback of 4.74m

4.         Proposed north side yard setback of 1.37m

5.         Proposed south side yard setback of 1.28m

6.         Proposed rear yard setback to the porch is 9.36m

7.         Proposed building length of 18.11m

8.         Proposed number of storeys is 3

 

Staff recommended that should Committee approve the application, the lot coverage and dwelling length be reduced and the front and rear yard setbacks be increased.  That the increase in length, number of storeys and lot coverage, as well as reduction in setbacks on all sides of the dwelling, result in an overdevelopment of the site and the cumulative impact of the proposed variances is significant.

 

On June 10, 2013 the Applicant appealed the Committee’s decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has not been scheduled as yet.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2013) Memo from Councillor Stintz on Request for City Solicitor to attend Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 8 Forest Wood
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59646.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 8 Forest Wood
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59647.pdf
Attachment 2 - A copy of Memo from Councillor Stintz to Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59648.pdf
Attachment 3 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Application for 8 Forest Wood
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59649.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 16, 2013) Submission from Councillor Karen Stintz - Ward 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence on requested variances (CC.New.NY25.51.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39144.pdf

NY25.55 - Final Report - Site Plan Control Application - 30 Scarsdale Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the proposed site plan control application for the lands at 30 Scarsdale Road subject to the draft conditions listed on Attachment No. 4 in the report (June 13, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council delegate back to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate the authority to issue final Site Plan Approval.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council:

 

1.         Requested that a community meeting be held prior to City Council's meeting on July 16 and 17, 2013, with the applicant and Ward Councillor in attendance to review the application and that the applicant pay for delivery of the meeting notice to the area bounded by Bond Avenue to the south, Leslie Street to the west, York Mills Road to the north and Scarsdale Road to the east.

Origin

(June 13, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to construct a 1 181.5 m2 two storey addition to an existing private school at 30 Scarsdale Road.  A total of 75 on-site parking spaces are proposed.

 

This application has been "bumped up" by the local Councillor to North York Community Council for a decision in accordance with By-law 483-2000.  This report reviews and recommends approval of the Site Plan Control application subject to fulfilling the attached draft conditions listed in Attachment No. 4.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 13, 2013) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Site Plan Control Application for 30 Scarsdale Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59652.pdf

NY25.56 - Installing a Designated Disabled Parking Space at 522 Oakwood Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bill 1071 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Acting Director, Transportation Services, to:

 

a.         Install a Designated Disabled Parking Spot in front of 522 Oakwood Avenue; and

 

b.         amend all related by-laws accordingly.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Colle

Summary

In the interest of ensuring Oakwood Village is accessible to persons with disabilities, and on behalf of a local business owner with mobility challenges, I ask that Transportation Services install a designated street parking space in front of 522 Oakwood Avenue and that all related by-laws be amended accordingly.

 

A designated disabled parking space at 522 Oakwood would greatly improve accessibility to the Oakwood Village commercial strip for this long-standing business owner and for any other person with a disability.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Colle on Installing a Designated Disabled Parking Space at 522 Oakwood Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-59638.pdf

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 25

SC25.4 - Assumption of Services - 262 Dean Park Road - Park Lane (Bayview) Homes Inc. - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2463

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council assume the services installed at 262 Dean Park Road and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plan of Subdivision.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the performance guarantee held with respect to this Plan of Subdivision with the exception of a cash settlement in the amount of $15,000.00 as set out in the report.

 

3.         City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Subdivision at 262 Dean Park Road.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

 

6.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plan of Subdivision at 262 Dean Park Road to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(March 15, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor

Summary

This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the development at 262 Dean Park Road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 15, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor - Assumption of Services - 262 Dean Park Road - Park Lane (Bayview ) Homes Inc. - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2463
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58511.pdf

SC25.6 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 520 Ellesmere Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
40 - Scarborough Agincourt
Attention
Bill 1123 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out in the report (May 24, 2013) from the Toronto Fire Services, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes – 520 Ellesmere Road.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route. 

Origin

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 520 Ellesmere Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58796.pdf
Attachment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes - 520 Ellesmere Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58797.pdf

SC25.7 - 34 Willowhurst Crescent - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council deny the application to remove the privately owned American elm tree at 34 Willowhurst Crescent.

Origin

(January 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report recommends that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree.  The owner has requested tree removal in order to build a detached garage at the rear of the property.

 

The subject tree is an American elm (Ulmus americana), measuring 85 cm in diameter, located at the rear of the property.  This tree is in fair to good condition and Urban Forestry cannot support removal of this tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 29, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 34 Willowhurst Crescent - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58518.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 9, 2013) Letter from Councillor Sarah Doucette, Ward 13 - Parkdale-High Park (SC.Main.SC25.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/comm/communicationfile-37595.pdf

SC25.10 - Turning Prohibitions - Staines Road and Chicory Lane/Wharnsby Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bills 1042 and 1043 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the prohibited turn regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (April 22, 2013) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council not approve the removal of the concrete island within Chicory Lane access to Staines Road opposite Wharnsby Drive.

 

3.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(April 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the need to enact a northwestbound and southwestbound left-turn prohibition at the intersection of Staines Road and Chicory Lane/Wharnsby Drive.  The intent of the turning prohibitions is to improve traffic operations, clearly define traffic lane usage, and avoid any conflicting turning movements.

 

Although feasible, the removal of the concrete island within the Chicory Lane private access to Staines Road is not recommended as it will require infrastructure removal and reconstruction at the City's cost.  Such cost would only serve to benefit the private condominium corporation served by Chicory Lane.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 22, 2013) Report and Appendix 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Turning Prohibitions - Staines Road and Chicory Lane/Wharnsby Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58519.pdf
Location Plan - Staines Road and Chicory Lane/Wharnsby Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58520.pdf

SC25.17 - Whistling Prohibition Update - Beare Road and the Canadian Pacific Railway Belleville Subdivision

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

           

1.         City Council request a formal response from the Canadian Pacific Railway explaining exactly what their requirements would be in order to enter into a whistling cessation agreement relating to the level crossing at Beare Road.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report provides an update on Council's resolution to prohibit the whistling of any railway equipment at the level crossing of Beare Road and the Canadian Pacific Railway at Mileage 192.48 Belleville Subdivision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Whistling Prohibition Update - Beare Road and the Canadian Pacific Railway Belleville Subdivision
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58754.pdf
Location Plan - Beare Road and the Canadian Pacific Railway Belleville Subdivision
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58755.pdf

Speakers

Carol DeGeer
Richard Dare

SC25.18 - School Bus Loading Zone - Seasons Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bills 1044, 1045 and 1046 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the school bus loading zone and parking regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This staff report concerns the feasibility of installing "School Bus Loading Zone" regulations, fronting Blessed Pier Giorgio Frassati Catholic School located at 8 Seasons Drive.

 

The proposed school parking regulations will provide a dedicated location for school buses to load and unload students at this new school.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report and Appendix 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - School Bus Loading Zone - Seasons Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58756.pdf
Location Plan - Seasons Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58757.pdf

SC25.22 - 1049 Military Trail - Removal of Holding Provision (H) Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East
Attention
Bill 1079 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 10827, for the lands at 1049 Military Trail substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 3 to report (June 11, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application was made on or after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

This application proposes the removal of the Holding Provision (H) at 1049 Military Trail to enable the development of a new institutional building at the University of Toronto Scarborough Campus (UTSC).  The proposed building is intended to be an Environmental Science and Chemistry building and would have a total floor area of approximately 10,500 square metres (113,025 square feet), and a maximum height of five (5) storeys.  The proposed use is allowed under the underlying Institutional "I" zoning on the subject lands following the removal of the Holding Provision (H). 

 

The applicant has provided the necessary reports addressing matters such as servicing, transportation, environmental studies including subsurface investigations, storm and ground water management.  These reports have been reviewed by appropriate City staff.

 

Some of the supporting studies provided by the applicant address only the proposed building, rather than future development for the entire area as illustrated on the key map, consequently staff are recommending removal of the Holding Provision (H) on only those lands upon which the proposed building is to be constructed, which represents a total area of approximately 4,700 square metres (50,590 square feet).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 11, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1049 Military Trail - Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-59566.pdf
(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1049 Military Trail - Removal of Holding Provision (H) Application - Information Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58827.pdf

SC25.23 - 240 Danforth Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Bill 1077 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Oakridge Community Zoning By-law No. 9812, for the lands at 240 Danforth Road substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application was made prior to January 1, 2007 and is not subject to the changes to the Planning Act that came into effect on that date or the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

This application proposes a zoning by-law amendment to permit a residential development on the existing 0.15 hectare (0.37 acre) site, located at 240 Danforth Road.  The proposal involves the construction of five townhouses fronting onto Danforth Road.  The townhouses are proposed to be two storeys in height and will have lot frontages ranging in size from 6 metres (20 feet) to 8 metres (26 feet) and lot areas ranging in size from 195 square metres (2,099 square feet) to 336 square metres (3,616 square feet).  The townhouses will have access to parking from the rear of the lots through a comment element driveway extending north off of Mack Avenue.

 

The proposed land use is consistent with the Neighbourhoods policies of the Toronto Official Plan.  The zoning by-law will allow for appropriate infill development of the site, compatible with the surrounding neighbourhood.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the zoning by-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58847.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 240 Danforth Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58848.pdf

SC25.24 - 3765 St Clair Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Bill 1109 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Cliffcrest Community Zoning By-law 9396, as amended, for the lands at 3765 St. Clair Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Cliffcrest Community Zoning By-law to permit 21 three-storey townhouses generally fronting St. Clair Avenue East, and two single detached dwellings fronting Brimley Road.  The two dwellings on Brimley Road will be severed from the remainder of the property at 3765 St Clair Avenue East.

 

The proposal represents residential infill and redevelopment of a place of worship use with a mix of townhouses and detached dwellings.  The proposed townhouses will continue the pattern of development along this portion of St. Clair Avenue East, and will complement the existing townhouse development immediately to the east of the site.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3765 St. Clair Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58791.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 3765 St. Clair Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58792.pdf

Speakers

Mike Shen
Mujibur Rahman
Jafor Uddin Mohammed
Mohammad Mizanvr Rahaman

Communications (Community Council)

(June 11, 2013) Letter from Lorna Campbell (SC.New.SC25.24.1)
(June 17, 2013) Petition from Area Residents (SC.New.SC25.24.2)
(June 17, 2013) Petition from A.M. Jaferuddin (SC.New.SC25.24.3)

SC25.25 - Kingston Road Revitalization Study - City-initiated Technical Amendment to the Birchcliff Community Zoning By-law - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Bill 1112 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the former City of Scarborough Birchcliff Community Zoning By-law No. 8786, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law amendment attached as Attachment 7 of the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This City-initiated amendment is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of technical amendments to the Birchcliff Community Zoning By-law in order to implement Council’s vision for the Kingston Road Revitalization Study approved on January 26 and 27, 2010.  Zoning standards to be revised relate to parking and access, building setbacks, 45-degree angular plane provisions, density, height, Section 37 community benefits, mechanical penthouses, and permitted uses, including the deletion of a number of exceptions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Kingston Road Revitalization Study - City-initiated Technical Amendment to the Birchcliff Community Zoning By-law - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58842.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - Kingston Road Revitalization Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-59030.pdf

SC25.26 - 975 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Bill 1078 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the former City of Scarborough Zoning By-law No. 9508 for the lands at 975 Kennedy Rd. substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application was made after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

This application proposes the rezoning of 975 Kennedy Road from Apartment Residential (A) to an appropriate zoning category to permit conversion of the existing 1 260 square metre former union hall building to establish a Place of Worship with associated community activities and 125 parking spaces.

 

The proposal would restore prior zoning permission for a Place of Worship at this location and will facilitate re-use of an existing former office building.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 24, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 975 Kennedy Road - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58789.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 975 Kennedy Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58790.pdf

SC25.27 - 1051 Ellesmere Road - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Bill 1088 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 1051 Ellesmere Road, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (May 23, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to report (May 23, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration.

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

2.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 1051 Ellesmere Road as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to report (May 23, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

3.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

4.         Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.

 

6.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 23, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application was made after January 1, 2007 and is subject to the changes to the Planning Act that came into effect on that date or the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

The Common Elements Condominium application (12 263268 ESC 37 CD) is required to provide legal vehicular access by private rear laneway to individual garages behind 37 ‘freehold’ townhouses currently under construction on a portion of 1051 Ellesmere Rd. (Block 6 on Plan 66M-2506).  The application is also required to ensure the shared ownership and maintenance of the laneway, a retaining wall with berm along the west side of the laneway for crash protection along the adjacent Scarborough RT/GO Transit rail corridor and associated and landscaped areas by the condominium corporation. 

 

The Part Lot Control Exemption application (13 133973 ESC 37 PL) is required to create the above noted 37 townhouses, together with 125 additional townhouse dwelling units also under construction on the balance of lands at 1051 Ellesmere Road, as separately conveyable townhouse dwelling units.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 23, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1051 Ellesmere Rd - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58857.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 1051 Ellesmere Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58858.pdf

SC25.28 - 3662 Midland Avenue Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
41 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bill 1113 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982, as amended, for the lands at 3662 Midland Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (May 30, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This zoning amendment application proposes to permit two commercial buildings having a combined gross floor area of 2 679 square metres (28,836 square feet) and to expand the range of permitted uses at 3662 Midland Avenue.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3662 Midland Avenue Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58828.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 3662 Midland Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58829.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Weston Consulting Group Inc. (SC.New.SC25.28.1)

SC25.29 - 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
41 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Employment Districts Zoning By-law 24982 for the lands at 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         Before Introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands to enter into one or more agreements pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the Section 37 matters as set out in the underlying Zoning By-law, and have such agreement (s) registered on title to the subject lands.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the zoning of the lands at 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East, a 16.4 hectare (40.5 acre) tract of land on the south side of Steeles Avenue East just west of Markham Road.  The lands would remain in the Special District Commercial zone (SDC), but the uses and performance standards would be altered.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.   The development consists of some large scale retail stores and retail pads on a major road at the edge of an employment area.  The rezoning is consistent with the overall development scheme for the lands and provides for the comprehensive redevelopment of the subject lands as a power centre commercial destination.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58843.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58844.pdf

SC25.30 - Southwest Corner of Morningside Avenue and McNicoll Avenue - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bill 1089 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Toronto Official Plan, for the lands at the southwest corner of Morningside and McNicoll Avenues substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report dated March 19, 2013 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(March 19, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This City-initiated amendment is subject to the new provisions of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

Planning staff are proposing to clarify the land use designation applying to a property located at the southwest corner of Morningside and McNicoll Avenues to avoid any ambiguity in the interpretation of the land use policies that apply to the lands. 

 

The proposed amendment would re-designate the subject lands from 'Neighbourhoods' to 'Employment Areas' consistent with Urban Structure Map (Map 2) of the Toronto Official Plan which shows the subject lands within an Employment District.  The proposed amendment would reflect and correlate with the designation which existed in the former Scarborough Official Plan which designated the lands Neighbourhood Commercial within an area designated as Business Park.  The proposed amendment would also correspond with the current Business Park (BP) and Neighbourhood Commercial (NC) zoning applying to the subject lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the City-initiated amendment to the Toronto Official Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 19, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Southwest Corner of Morningside Avenue and McNicoll Avenue - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58851.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - Southwest Corner of Morningside Avenue and McNicoll Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58853.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(December 18, 2012) Letter from Peter Chee, Mi-Ko Urban Consulting Inc. (SC.Main.SC25.30.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/comm/communicationfile-37768.pdf
(April 8, 2013) E-mail from Peter Chee, Mi-Ko Urban Consulting Inc. (SC.Main.SC25.30.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/comm/communicationfile-37769.pdf
(June 13, 2013) Fax from M. Virginia Maclean QC (SC.New.SC25.30.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/comm/communicationfile-38254.pdf

SC25.31 - 1088 Progress Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bills 1116 and 1117 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 1088 Progress Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 12 to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council amend the Malvern Community Zoning By-law No. 14402, for the lands at 1088 Progress Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 13 to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act which shall be registered on title and which shall secure financial contributions toward specific capital facilities as follows:

           

a.         The provision of a cash payment of $242,000 (indexed annually in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto (from the date the zoning by-law comes into full force and effect) payable to the City of Toronto, as follows:

 

i.          $60,000 payable prior to the issuance of the first building permit on the southern parcel (Part A) towards capital improvements to the courtyard at Burrows Hall Park.

 

ii.         $182,000 payable prior to the issuance of the first building permit on the northern parcel (Part B) towards capital improvements associated with the baseball diamonds at Neilson Park and facilities associated with the tennis courts at Major Abbas Ali Park (formerly McLevin Park).

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

The proposed official plan and zoning by-law amendment application proposes to accommodate a 2-phase condominium development consisting of a total of 414 dwelling units in stacked townhouse and apartment building forms.  Specifically, Phase 1would consist of 105 stacked townhouses in 3 blocks that are 3 and 4-storeys in height on the southern portion of the subject lands and, Phase 2 would consist of 309 dwelling units in 2 apartment buildings of 13 and 18 storeys with ground floor commercial uses on the northern portion of the subject lands.  The overall increase in the permitted density and height would be from 326 to 414 dwelling units and from 16 to 18-storeys.  The subject lands are collectively known as 1088 Progress Avenue.

 

The proposal supports both existing and planned public transit infrastructure and provides an alternative residential built form in the immediate area.  The proposed 2-phase development enables the City to secure Section 37 funds towards local park improvements in the community in each phase of development.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the official plan and zoning by-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1088 Progress Avenue - Official Plan Amendment & Rezoning Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58922.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 1088 Progress Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58923.pdf

Speakers

Alan Lam, Vice President, Chinese Cultural Centre of Greater Toronto

Communications (Community Council)

(June 2, 2013) E-mail from an Area Resident (SC.Main.SC25.31.1)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Helena Wang (SC.New.SC25.31.2)

SC25.32 - 4332 to 4340 Lawrence Avenue East - Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East
Attention
Bill 1114 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the West Hill Community Zoning By-law  No. 10327, as amended, for the lands at 4332 to 4340 Lawrence Avenue East, substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendment attached as Attachment 6: Draft Zoning By-law to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.

 

3.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law No. 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 1: Draft Plan of Subdivision to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 7: Conditions of Draft Plan of Subdivision to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of subdivision for registration.

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the ongoing technical review of this development.

 

c.         draft plan approval not being issued until the necessary Bill is in full force and effect.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

The rezoning application proposes to permit twenty-three (23), two-storey freehold dwelling units to be developed at 4332 to 4340 Lawrence Avenue East.  The application for a plan of subdivision will create an 18.5 metre (61 feet) public street as an extension of Asterfield Drive to connect with Lawrence Avenue East as well as to subdivide the lands into twenty-three (23) individual residential lots.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law and also advises that the Chief Planner may approve the draft plan of subdivision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 4332 to 4340 Lawrence Avenue East - Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58845.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 4332-4340 Lawrence Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-58846.pdf

Speakers

Jason Park, Partner, Dentons Canada LLP
Ron Herczeg, Owner, Inaugural Source
Allen Elias

Communications (Community Council)

(January 17, 2013) Letter from Ron Wootton, Coronation Community Association (SC.New.SC25.32.1)
(June 11, 2013) Fax from Bruce and Betty Smith (SC.New.SC25.32.2)
(June 17, 2013) Fax from Bruce and Betty Smith (SC.New.SC25.32.3)

SC25.33 - 3447 Kennedy Road (Rear) - Removal of Holding Provision (H) Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
39 - Scarborough-Agincourt
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (SC25.33a with recommendations)

Bill 1081 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider a report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, on the Removal of Holding Provision (H) Application at 3447 Kennedy Rd. (Application 13 166440 ESC 39 OZ).

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council:

 

1.         Requested the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to report directly to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 on the Removal of Holding Provision (H) Application at 3447 Kennedy Rd. (Application 13 166440 ESC 39 OZ).

 

2.         Directed the City Clerk to provide notice as per the requirements of the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Member Motion from Councillor Mike Del Grande

Summary

On October 30, 2012 City Council approved a rezoning for a commercial development on the lands to the rear of 3447 Kennedy Road to permit 12 077 m2 (130,000 sq. ft.) of commercial development (item SC19.24). Zoning By-law 265-2013 was subsequently enacted with a Holding provision (H) to ensure certain matters regarding access over adjacent Metrolinx lands, a revised traffic impact study and agreement(s) to secure required transportation improvements were provided to City Council's satisfaction. The applicant submitted a Lifting of H application on May 10, 2013 and supporting information on June 7, 2013. In order to ensure that this development proceeds as anticipated, I am requesting City Planning to report on this application directly to the City Council meeting of July 16 and 17, 2013.

Background Information (City Council)

(July 8, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 3447 Kennedy Road (Rear) - Removal of a Holding Provision (H) Application - Final Report (SC25.33a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60268.pdf

SC25.35 - 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Deferral of Section 37 Funds

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
41 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that City Council:

 

1.         Authorize the City Solicitor to amend the provision of the Section 37 agreement for 5789 to 5951 Steeles Avenue East pertaining to the deadline for the final cash contribution in order to allow the owner to defer the final cash contribution to March 31, 2014.

 

Origin

(June 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Chin Lee

Summary

Requesting amendment to the provision of the Section 37 agreement for 5789 to 5951 Steeles Avenue East pertaining to the deadline for the final cash contribution.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 13, 2013) Letter from Councillor Chin Lee re 5789-5951 Steeles Avenue East - Deferral of Section 37 Funds
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-59670.pdf

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 25

TE25.2 - Naming of Public Lane Located North of Queen Street East Between Logan Avenue and Booth Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bill 1041 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the naming of the public lane located north of Queen Street East, between Logan Avenue and Booth Avenue, as "Faiers Lane". 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's website. No one appeared before the Community Council.

Origin

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Manager, Land and Property Surveys

Summary

On May 14, 2013, Toronto and East York Community Council adopted Item TE24.75 requesting the Manager, Land and Property Surveys to investigate and report to Toronto and East York Community Council on the suitability of naming the public lane located north of Queen Street East between Logan Avenue and Booth Avenue as "Faiers Lane".

 

Dr. Alan Faiers is a local physician who retired at the end of December 2012.

 

Community Councils have delegated authority to decide street naming matters which comply with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy. The Policy goes on to state that names of living persons should be used only in "exceptional circumstances".  However, the Policy does not provide any guidance as to what constitutes exceptional circumstances, and therefore Community Councils are unable to exercise that delegated authority in the case of a living person. Therefore, if Toronto and East York Community Council should determine that this name merits approval, that approval must come from City Council.

 

This report recommends that the proposed name "Faiers Lane" be approved, as the name complies with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy, provided it is determined by City Council that this is an exceptional circumstance.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2013) Report from the Manager, Land and Property Surveys - Naming of Public Lane Located North of Queen Street East Between Logan Avenue and Booth Avenue - Faiers Lane
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58664.pdf

TE25.3 - Final Report - Queen Street West (between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street) - Restaurant Study

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Communications TE25.3.13 to TE25.3.15 have been submitted on this Item

Bills 1106 and 1107 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law amendment attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law amendment attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council direct that staff continue to investigate means of restricting the concentration of licensed restaurants and bars on Queen Street West and that the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District report back to Toronto and East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2014 on whether it is feasible to enact such restrictions and the regulatory and administrative changes necessary to effectively implement them.

 

4.         If it is feasible for the City of Toronto to restrict the concentration of licensed restaurants and bars on Queen Street West, City Council direct the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council on appropriate amendments to the zoning by-law implemented for the Study Area including limits on the concentration provisions for licensed establishments only.

 

5.         Within three years of the concentration provisions of the attached by-laws coming into force and effect, City Council direct the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council on the impact of the concentration provisions of the by-laws.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required. 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to consider as part of the Queen Street East Planning Study, the recommendations contained in the report (May 24, 2013) headed "Final Report - Queen Street West (between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street) - Restaurant Study".

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This proposal is to amend the Zoning By-law with respect to implementing additional restrictions on restaurants and related uses on Queen Street West between the east side of Roncesvalles Avenue and the west side of Dufferin Street (the Study Area) in Ward 14.

 

Staff recommend a number of amendments to the Zoning By-law which seek to balance the interests of area residents and businesses and address concerns related to the degree of concentration of restaurants and bars along this section of Queen Street West as well as the changing nature of some restaurants which function more like bars later in the evening.  The cumulative effects of the amendments aim to limit the overall impacts of restaurants and related uses on the adjacent residential and commercial uses, while still allowing opportunities for new restaurants and related uses to open and for the expansion of existing uses.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of amendments to the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Queen Street West (between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street) - Restaurant Study - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59243.pdf
Attachment No. 4 - Draft By-law to Amend Zoning By-law No. 569-2013 - Final Report - Queen Street West (between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street) - Restaurant Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59634.pdf

Speakers

Sheila A. Lippiatt

Communications (Community Council)

(April 26, 2013) E-mail from Steven A. Zakem, Aird & Berlis LLP (TE.Main.TE25.3.1)
(June 6, 2013) E-mail from Peter Welsh (TE.Supp.TE25.3.2)
(June 7, 2013) E-mail from Tracy Ford (TE.Supp.TE25.3.3)
(June 7, 2013) E-mail from Jeremy Kesten (TE.Supp.TE25.3.4)
(June 6, 2013) E-mail from Norman Kolasky and Brian Torry, Co-Chairs, Roncesvalles-Macdonell Residents' Association, in support of attached letter(April 26, 2013) from Victor Willis, The Neighbourhood Land Trust (TE.Supp.TE25.3.5)
(June 10, 2013) E-mail from Edward Bozzo (TE.Supp.TE25.3.6)
(June 11, 2013) E-mail from Gwen McDonald (TE.Supp.TE25.3.7)
(June 11, 2013) E-mail from Ric Amis (TE.Supp.TE25.3.8)
(June 12, 2013) E-mail from Nicholas Morgan (TE.Supp.TE25.3.9)
(June 12, 2013) E-mail from Edgardo Sepulveda (TE.Supp.TE25.3.10)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Steven A. Zakem, Aird & Berlis LLP (TE.Supp.TE25.3.11)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Ric Amis (TE.Supp.TE25.3.12)

Communications (City Council)

(July 7, 2013) E-mail from Sheila A. Lippiatt (CC.Main.TE25.3.13)
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Tony Elenis, President and Chief Executive Officer, Ontario Restaurant Hotel and Motel Association and Debra DeMonte, Toronto Restaurant Region, Chair (CC.New.TE25.3.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39109.pdf
(July 15, 2013) Letter from Peter Thoma, Partner, UrbanMetrics inc. (CC.New.TE25.3.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39110.pdf

TE25.4 - Final Report - 202-204 Bathurst Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 202-204 Bathurst Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to the report (May 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments to Section 1.(5) of Attachment No. 10:

 

5.a.      The building shall be setback 7.5 metres from the R4 zone to the west.

 

5.b.      The building shall be contained within a 45 degree angular plane projected over the lot from the setback required by 5.a. above, at an elevation of 10.5 metres above grade.

  

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to obtain the Notice of Approval conditions, as required under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to redevelop the lands at 202-204 Bathurst Street with a 7-storey mixed-use building, containing retail at grade and twenty-four residential dwelling units above.

 

The proposal will have an overall gross floor area of 1,883 square metres, of which 122 square metres will be allocated to the non-residential use at grade.  A total of 10 parking spaces are proposed on site.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 202-204 Bathurst Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58856.pdf

Speakers

Lubomyr Lahodynskyj
Jacqueline Bruner
Andrew Kruk
Jamie Levin
Jane McFarlane

Communications (Community Council)

(May 27, 2013) E-mail from Jamie Levin (TE.Main.TE25.4.1)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Jacqueline Bruner (TE.Supp.TE25.4.2)
(June 17, 2013) Petition from Andrew Kruk, signed by approximately 135 individuals in opposition to the proposed development. (TE.Supp.TE25.4.3)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Chris Walker, Chair, Trinity Bellwoods Community Association (TE.Supp.TE25.4.4)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Sarah Treleaven (TE.Supp.TE25.4.5)

Declared Interests (Community Council)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Adam Vaughan - in that his family owns property within the vicinity of 202-204 Bathurst Street.

TE25.5 - Final Report - 20 Brunel Court (Block 31 - Railway Lands West) and 95 Fort York Boulevard - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1136 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan to add the easternmost 30 metres of 95 Fort York Boulevard, also known as Canoe Landing Park, to the list of properties in Site and Area Specific Policy No. 265, as shown in Attachment 2 to the report (May 22, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This City-initiated Official Plan Amendment application proposes to add the easternmost 30 metres of the lands at 95 Fort York Boulevard to Official Plan Site and Area Specific Policy #265 so they are exempt from Official Plan Policy 4.3.8, which prohibits the disposal of City-owned land in areas designated as Parks and Open Spaces.

 

The property known as 95 Fort York Boulevard is Canoe Landing Park in the Railway Lands West. Immediately to the east of the park is Block 31 (20 Brunel Court) which will be developed with two schools, a City-owned community centre, a daycare and affordable housing, as outlined in the Railway Lands West Secondary Plan.  As part of the development plan for the site, the below-grade parking garage and the buildings will protrude into a portion of 95 Fort York Boulevard, all of which is designated Parks and Open Space. 

 

As stipulated in the legal agreements which apply to the site, the City will be entering into a long term lease (99 years) with both the Toronto District School Board, and the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the property.  A lease of this length is considered a disposal of City land.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the City-initiated application to amend the Official Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 20 Brunel Court (Block 31 - Railway Lands West) and 95 Fort York Boulevard - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58700.pdf

TE25.6 - Final Report - 7A, 7B, 7C Austin Terrace and 1A, 1B, 1C Lyndhurst Court - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1086 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 7A, 7B, and 7C Austin Terrace and 1B, and 1C Lyndhurst Court, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (May 21, 2013), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (May 21, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

2.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 7A, 7B, and 7C Austin Terrace and 1A, 1B, and 1C Lyndhurst Court as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to the report (May 21, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

3.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

4.         Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.

 

6.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The part lot control exemption application (13 106413 STE 21 PL) is required to create 3 separately conveyable townhouse dwelling units (7A, 7B, and 7C Austin Terrace), 2 separately conveyable semi-detached dwelling units (1B and 1C Lyndhurst Court), and 1 detached dwelling (1A Lyndhurst Court) on the subject lands.

 

The draft plan of common elements condominium application (13 106405 STE 21 CD) is required to provide legal access, at the rear of the site, to the individual underground garages for the units at 7A, 7B, and 7C Austin Terrace and 1B and 1C Lyndhurst Court.  The unit at 1A Lyndhurst will not be part of the common element condominium.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 7A, 7B, 7C Austin Terrace and 1A, 1B, 1C Lyndhurst Court - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58819.pdf

TE25.7 - Final Report - 2400 Bathurst Street - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the application to demolish the 31 existing residential rental units located at 2400 Bathurst Street pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of rental housing as outlined in the report (May 15, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District:

 

a.         the owner shall provide and maintain thirty-one (31) residential rental units on the subject site as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, comprising one studio, 7 one-bedroom units and 22 two-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit, of which at least 6 shall have affordable rents and 24 shall have rents no higher than mid-range rents, and 1 will have no rent stipulation;

 

b.         the owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance including the right to return to a replacement rental unit for the eligible tenants to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

c.         the owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in 1.a. and b. above and as described in the zoning by-law amendment approved by the Ontario Municipal Board on May 13, 2013 (Attachment 2 to the report (May 15, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; and

 

d.         the owner shall enter into and register, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act (to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor) agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the 31 replacement rental units, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or their designate (to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands).

 

2.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after all of the following has occurred:

 

a.         satisfaction of the conditions in Recommendation 1;

 

b.         after the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments approved by the Ontario Municipal Board have come into full force and effect; and

 

c.         the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2.

 

4.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         the owner erect a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

b.         should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 4.a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

5.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 111 Agreements.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application for a Section 111 permit, under the City of Toronto Act, proposes to demolish an existing five-storey apartment building with 31 residential rental units at 2400 Bathurst Street.  The Applicant has approval from the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) to construct a new 13-storey residential building with a condominium and full replacement of the 31 existing rental units within the building, with a slightly different unit mix.

 

This report's recommendations are in regard to the rental demolition application on the subject site under Municipal Code Chapter 667, pursuant to the City of Toronto Act.

 

The related Zoning and Official Plan Amendment applications for the proposed redevelopment were appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on July 16, 2012.  In November 2012, Council gave Staff direction to settle the appeals with the applicant.  The Official Plan and Zoning by-law Amendments were approved by the OMB on May 13, 2013.

 

This report provides the results of the negotiations on the rental housing matters, an overview of the approved development, and makes recommendations to approve a Section 111 permit under Chapter 667 and Chapter 363 of the Municipal Code, for the demolition of the 31 existing rental units subject to conditions.  The conditions include the full replacement of the 31 rental units and the provision of tenant relocation assistance, including the right for tenants to return to occupy a rental unit in the new building.  This report recommends entering into an agreement under Section 111 to secure these conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 2400 Bathurst Street - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58696.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2013) Letter from John French (TE.Supp.TE25.7.1)

TE25.8 - Final Report - 282 St. Clair Avenue West - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 282 St. Clair Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86 for the lands at 282 St. Clair Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments to Attachment No. 10:

 

a.         That Section 1.(h) and Map 2 be amended to provide that:

 

-           the number of storeys be reduced from 9 to 8, with an associated maximum building height of 26 metres, excluding the mechanical penthouse; and

 

-           the size of the mechanical penthouse be reduced to comply with the mechanical penthouse provisions of s. 4(2)(a) of By-law 438-86.

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner of the lands at 282 St. Clair Avenue West to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following facilities, services and matters:

 

a.         The owner shall:

 

i.          make a cash contribution in the amount of  $200,000 to be payable prior to the first above-grade building permit.  The funds are to be used for streetscape improvements in Forest Hill Village to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and the amount shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment; and

 

ii.         make a cash payment in the amount of $200,000 to be payable prior to the first above-grade building permit.  The funds are to be used towards capital improvements for the City of Toronto Museum located at Casa Loma, or for improvements to local area parks, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and the amount shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

5.         City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take all necessary action to give effect to the foregoing, including execution of the Section 37 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law in order to permit the construction of a 9-storey residential building, with 118 dwelling units and 109 below-grade parking spaces.

 

The proposed development as revised conforms to the development criteria of the Apartment Neighbourhoods Official Plan policies. An amendment to Area Specific Official Plan Policy 221 is required with respect to the height of the proposed development.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 282 St. Clair Avenue West - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58861.pdf

Speakers

Lee Weston
David Ross
Brian Maguire, Acting Chair, Forest Hill Homeowners' Association
Albert Milstein
David Eastaugh
Peter Farmer
Jordan Solomon
Ronald A. Factor, President, Geolam Inc.
Mark Leung
Cyndi Rottenberg-Walker, Urban Strategies
Kim Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP, representing the Forest Hill Homeowners' Association
David Pontarini, Harini Pontarini Architects
Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol

Communications (Community Council)

(June 4, 2013) Letter from Albert and Barbara Milstein (TE.Supp.TE25.8.1)
(June 14, 2013) Letter from Dr. Janet Polivy and Dr. C. Peter Herman (TE.Supp.TE25.8.2)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Marilyn Shesko and David Hertzman (TE.Supp.TE25.8.3)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from David Ross (TE.Supp.TE25.8.4)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Ronald A. Factor (TE.Supp.TE25.8.5)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Brian Maguire, Acting Chair, Forest Hill Homeowners' Association (TE.Supp.TE25.8.6)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Mark Leung (TE.Supp.TE25.8.7)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from David Hertzman and Marilyn Shesko (TE.Supp.TE25.8.8)
(June 17, 2013) Submission from Cyndi Rottenberg-Walker, Urban Strategies Inc. (TE.Supp.TE25.8.9)

TE25.9 - Final Report - 2263-2287 Yonge Street, 8-10 Eglinton Avenue East, 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue - Zoning Amendment and Rental Demolition Application under Municipal Code 667

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1166 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 2263-2287 Yonge Street, 8-10 Eglinton Avenue East and 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 11 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following modifications:

 

a.         Revise Map 2 to remove floors 37 and 38 from the North Building, resulting in a reduction of the permitted height from 123.0 metres to 117.1 metres for the North Building.

 

b.         Revise the minimum parking requirements in Subsections 15(a) through 15(d) as follows:

 

(i)         0.1 parking spaces for each bachelor dwelling unit;

(ii)        0.3 parking spaces for each one-bedroom dwelling unit;

(iii)       0.5 parking spaces for each two-bedroom dwelling unit; and

(iv)       0.7 parking spaces for each three and more bedroom dwelling units.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, such agreement to be registered on title to the lands to secure the facilities, services and matters as follows:

 

a.         The community benefits to be provided and secured at the owner's sole expense in the Section 37 Agreement are, in a form satisfactory to the City with conditions providing for no credit for development charges, indexing escalation of both the financial contributions and letters of credit, indemnity, insurance, GST, termination and unwinding and registration and priority of the agreement, as follows:

 

i.          contributions in the amount of $3,250,000.00 payable prior to the first above-grade building permit to be applied as directed by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the Ward Councillor, in accordance with the following or towards other local area park or streetscape improvements, as appropriate:

 

1.         up to $1,250,000.00 for neighbourhood improvements to the Yonge-Eglinton area as recommended by the Parks and Open Space and Streetscape Master Plan Study in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and with the Ward Councillor; and

 

2.         up to $2,000,000 for the acquisition, design and construction of a new public space on the TTC-owned property on the south-west corner of Yonge and Eglinton in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and with the Ward Councillor.

 

Such total amount is to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

b.         The owner shall enter into one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act which are registered on title to the lot to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor to secure:

 

i.          Provision and maintenance of not less than 30 new replacement rental dwelling units on the lot, with rents no higher than mid-range rents,  to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, subject to the following:

 

1.         The replacement rental dwelling units shall comprise of 23 one-bedroom units, and 7 two-bedroom units; and the combined floor area of the 30 replacement rental dwelling units shall be not less than 17,641 square feet. Each rental dwelling unit shall have a storage locker.  There shall be 3 accessible units.  The units shall have a range of sizes as per the following list:

 

-           12 one-bedroom units with a minimum of 450 sq. ft. of which 6 units shall be larger than 500 sq. ft.;

 

-           11 one-bedroom units with a minimum of 590 sq. ft. of which 5 units shall be larger than 690 sq. ft.; and

 

-           7 two-bedroom units with a minimum of 707 sq. ft. of which 6 units shall be larger than 710 sq. ft.

 

2.         The replacement rental dwelling units shall be maintained as rental housing units for at least 20 years, beginning with the date each unit is occupied and until the owner obtains approval for a zoning by-law amendment removing the requirement for the replacement rental housing units to be maintained as rental units.  No application may be submitted for condominium registration, or for any other conversion to non-rental housing purposes, or for demolition without providing for replacement during the 20-year period.

 

3.         The building permit which provides for the replacement rental dwelling units shall be issued no later than the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for any building with residential uses on the lot.  The 30 replacement rental dwelling units shall be ready for occupancy no later than the date by which no more than 90% of the other dwelling units contained within the same building are available and ready for occupancy.

 

ii.         Provision and maintenance of rents no greater than mid-range rents charged to the tenants who rent each of the designated 30 replacement rental dwelling units during the first 10 years of occupancy, such that the initial rent shall not exceed an amount based on one and a half times (1.5x) the most recent Fall Update Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation Rental Market Report average rent for the City of Toronto by unit type inclusive of basic utility costs.  Upon turnover, the rent charged to any new tenant shall not exceed the greater of the most recently charged rent or one and a half times (1.5x) the most recent Fall Update Rental Market Report average rent for the City of Toronto by unit type, and over the course of the 10 year period, annual increases shall not exceed the Provincial rental guideline and, if applicable, permitted above-guideline increases.

 

iii.        Rents charged to tenants occupying a replacement rental dwelling unit at the end of the 10-year period set forth in 3.b.ii. shall be subject only to increases which do not exceed the Provincial rent guideline and, if applicable, permitted above guideline increases, so long as they continue to occupy their dwelling unit or until the expiry of the rental tenure period set forth in 3.b.i.2. with a phase-in period of at least three years to unrestricted rents.

 

iv.        Rents charged to tenants newly occupying a replacement rental dwelling unit after the completion of the 10-year period set forth in 3.b.ii. will not be subject to restrictions by the City of Toronto under the terms of the Section 37 Agreement.

 

c.         The owner shall provide, prior to the introduction of bills in City Council, and implement a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, that requires the owner to provide for each eligible tenant at 25 Roehampton Avenue the right to return to a replacement rental dwelling unit, assistance that includes at least a moving allowance and other financial assistance geared to the affordability gap between the current rent and local area rent by unit type, with provisions for special needs tenants.

 

d.         The owner shall enter into an agreement with the City, prior to any building permit,  to secure the implementation of appropriate local roadway improvements, at the Owner's expense, as may be required which address the potential traffic impacts of the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Construction Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the owner and the City may modify or amend the said agreement(s), from time to time and upon the consent of the City and the owner, without further amendment to those provisions of this zoning by-law which identify the facilities, services and matters to be secured.

 

4.         City Council approve the application to demolish the existing building at 25 Roehampton Avenue that includes 30 residential rental dwelling units pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for replacement of the rental housing units:

 

i.          the owner shall provide and maintain 30 residential rental dwelling units in the development, for a period of at least 20 years, comprising 23 one-bedroom units and 7 two-bedroom units, which shall have mid-range rents;

 

ii.         the owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance for tenants in the existing rental building including the right to return to a replacement rental unit for the eligible tenants to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

iii.        the owner shall obtain a building permit which provides for the replacement rental  dwelling units no later than the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for any building with residential uses on the lot;

 

iv.        the owner shall enter into, and register on title, one or more Section 111 Agreements to secure the conditions outlined in (i) to (iii) herein and as further detailed in the draft zoning by-law amendment which is Attachment 11 to the final rezoning report from City Planning dated May 24, 2013, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and the City Solicitor;

 

v.         the owner shall enter into and register, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or her designate (to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of lands).

 

5.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue a preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the existing residential rental housing building after all of the following has occurred:

 

i.          the satisfaction of, or securing of the conditions in Recommendation 4; and

 

ii.         the official plan amendment and zoning by-law amendment in Recommendations 1 and 2 have come into full force and effect; and

 

iii.        the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval for the development by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

6.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 5 for the existing rental housing building.

 

7.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for the residential rental building no earlier than the date that the owner has submitted application for a building permit for the shoring and excavation for the lands on which the existing rental building is situated, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation 5 which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         the owner erect a residential building on site no later than five (5) years from the date the permit is issued for demolition of the buildings; and

 

b.         should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 7.a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector's roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that such sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

8.         City Council require that the owner pay for and construct any necessary improvements to the municipal infrastructure, including the proposed watermain upgrades, in connection with the Functional Servicing Report as accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager of Toronto Water.

 

9.         City Council require that the owner make arrangements with Engineering and Construction Services for work in the City's right-of-way and to provide access to and from the site and to provide financial security, submit engineering and inspection fees and provide insurance as required by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

 

10.       City Council require the applicant to provide an access to the Yonge-Eglinton subway station from the North Building on Roehampton Avenue.

 

11.       City Council direct City Planning staff to secure, as a condition of final Site Plan Approval, the high quality materials proposed by the Applicant.

 

12.       City Council direct the Applicant to consult with the Ward Councillor and local residents group on the review of the final design features prior to final Site Plan Approval.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to demolish all existing buildings on the site (including a 7-storey, 30-unit rental apartment building).

 

The applicants are proposing to redevelop the site by constructing a 58-storey building at the northeast corner of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue East (2263-2287 Yonge Street and 8-10 Eglinton Avenue East).  This building will be referred to as the 'south tower'.  The south tower is to consist of a 55-storey residential tower with a floorplate of approximately 780 square metres sitting on top of a 3-storey podium which extends north on Yonge Street to the northerly extent of the site.  The podium would contain commercial uses at-grade and on the second floor.  The proposed south building contains 632 residential condominium units.

 

This application also proposes to construct a 38-storey residential building with 222 residential units of which 30 units will be for rental replacement within the 'north building' at 25 Roehampton Avenue.

 

A Rental Housing Demolition application (File 11 326114 STE 22 RH) has been submitted with the rezoning application to demolish the 30 existing mid-range residential rental units located at 25 Roehampton Avenue.  The applicants have proposed a full replacement of the rental units within the proposed north tower with affected tenants receiving relocation assistance and being able to return to the new replacement units at similar rents.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of: the application to amend the Zoning By-law; and the Rental Housing Demolition application under Municipal Code 667 subject to the conditions outlined in this report, and based on planning and design merits which include:

 

a.         the site is located at the intersection of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue and within an Urban Growth Centre.  The proposed buildings are located in a Mixed Use Area (a small portion of 25 Roehampton is within an Apartment Neighbourhood) within the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan.  The site is adjacent to the Yonge-Eglinton Apartment Neighbourhood.  Appropriate apartment infill or redevelopment is anticipated at this location within these designations;

 

b.         the proposed residential units are within walking distance of retail shops, services, entertainment and places of employment both on-site (1,593.88 square metres of retail and 3,252.21 square metres of office are proposed within the south building) and in the surrounding Yonge-Eglinton area;

 

c.         the proposed north building is within walking distance of the Yonge-Eglinton subway station and the planned Eglinton Crosstown station.  The proposed south building proposes a connection to both via a below-grade retail concourse accessed from the proposed pedestrian plaza at the corner of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue;

 

d.         the proposed buildings are point towers in an area that is currently characterized by tall buildings of varying heights;

 

e.         the site is a large, irregularly-shaped lot which extends northwards from the corner of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue through to Roehampton Avenue (but not all on the Yonge Street frontage).  The application proposes its tallest height (58 storeys) at the corner and transitions down to the 38-storey proposed building to the north on Roehampton Avenue (as is recommended by the Urban Growth Centre policies);

 

f.          the proposed development includes a hard and soft-landscaped pedestrian plaza which is approximately 16 metres in depth (from Eglinton Avenue).  It includes a stair (with green roof) access to transit station(s), continuous tree-trench plantings, a feature screen wall with ivies and other plant materials in front of the west face of the solid wall of the existing building to the east and bicycle rings.  The plaza emphasizes pedestrian (not vehicular) use of the intersection of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue;

 

g.         the proposed south building includes retail at-grade which would add vitality to the existing local commercial district;

 

h.         the proposed buildings will not unduly shadow existing Neighbourhoods buildings and open spaces (including the sports field at North Toronto Collegiate); and

 

i.          the Section 37 benefits that would be secured as a result of approval and construction of this development.  The Section 37 benefits include implementing public realm and streetscape improvements as may be recommended by a forthcoming 'Parks, Open Space and Streetscape Master Plan Study' for the Yonge-Eglinton Urban Growth Centre area.  Section 37 benefits would also include securing rental replacement housing in the new buildings and the terms which shall be required of those replacement units.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 2263-2287 Yonge Street, 8-10 Eglinton Avenue East, 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue - Zoning Amendment and Rental Demolition Application under Municipal Code 667 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58855.pdf

Speakers

Bob Murphy
Ben Daube, President, The Sherwood Park Residents' Association
Sean Boulton
Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol
Rosario Varacalli, R. Varacalli Architect Inc

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2013) E-mail from C. Ann King, Chair, Community Liaison Committee, Stanley Knowles Housing Co-operative (TE.Supp.TE25.9.1)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Frank Peters, President, Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (ARECA) (TE.Supp.TE25.9.2)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Sean Boulton (TE.Supp.TE25.9.3)
(June 17, 2013) Fax from Albert Silver (TE.Supp.TE25.9.4)

TE25.10 - Final Report - 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments - Rental Housing Demolition Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communication TE25.10.4 has been submitted on this Item

Bills 1099 and 1100 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86 for the lands at 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:

 

a.         amending Section 4 by inserting an exemption from the parking requirements of Section 4(5)(c) of By-law 438-86 by inserting the following Sections 4.(l) and 4.(m) and renumbering the balance of Section 4 accordingly

 

(l)         a minimum of 251 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained on the lot of which 209 parking spaces shall be for residents of the dwelling units and 42 shall be for visitors to the dwelling units;

 

(m)       notwithstanding Section 4.(l) above, 29 of the required visitor parking spaces may be provided in a parking facility located within 200 metres of the lot, provided that a minimum of 250 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained on the lot, of which 237 parking spaces shall be for residents of the dwelling units and 13 shall be for visitors to the dwelling units and the table in Section 4.(j) above shall be revised to require 198 instead of 199 parking spaces having minimum dimensions of 2.6 metres by 5.6 metres;"; and

 

b.         amending Appendix 1, headed "Section 37 Provisions" to Attachment 10 by adding the following Subsection e)v. in order to secure off-site parking in the Section 37 agreement as a legal convenience:

 

 "v.       Any off-site parking provided pursuant to Section 4.(m) of this Zoning By-law shall be provided to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services."
 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

           

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.          Prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit, pay to the City the sum of $4,250,000, consisting of the following:

           

a.         $3,525,000 to be dedicated within a 200 metre radius of the site to parkland acquisition, park construction, and/or local streetscape improvements to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the local Councillor;

 

b.         $425,000 to be dedicated to capital improvements of Toronto Community Housing Corporation properties in Ward 27 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the local Councillor; and

 

c.         $300,000 to be dedicated to the provision of bike share facilities at locations near the development to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the local Councillor.

 

ii.         Require that the cash amounts identified in Recommendation 4.a.i. above shall be indexed annually in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.

 

iii.        The provision and maintenance on site of at least 78 replacement rental units, comprising 16 bachelor, at least 37 one-bedroom or greater and 25 two-bedroom units.  At least 28 of the replacement rental units shall have mid-range rents.

 

iv.        Tenant relocation and assistance, including the right for eligible tenants to return to a replacement unit and compensation to lessen the hardship of moving.

  

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.          conveyance to the City for public highway purposes a 0.71 metre wide strip of land the full extent of the site abutting the north limit of Wellesley Street West, to a minimum depth of 1.2 metres;

 

ii.         conveyance to the City for public highway purposes a 4.0 metre wide strip of land the full extent of the site abutting the south limit of Phipps Street, to a minimum depth of 1.2 metres, excluding levels 2 through 8, inclusive, of the building's podium;

 

iii.        rights-of-way/easements for 24-hour public access to the entirety of the colonnades along the Wellesley Street West and Bay Street frontages of the development; and

 

iv.        a minimum of 65 units, or 9% of all units, will be 3-bedroom units or have an average size of 950 square feet.

 

v.         Any off-site parking provided pursuant to Section 4.(m) of this Zoning By-law shall be provided to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services.

 

5.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to secure, amongst others, the following matters to her satisfaction in a Site Plan Agreement pursuant to Section 41 of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act:

 

a.         separation of garbage and recyclable waste for the residential components of the building;

 

b.         access to a retail waste storage for all retail units;

 

c.         residential waste rooms of a size in accordance with "City of Toronto Requirements for Garbage, Recycling and Organics Collection for New Developments, Revised May 2012";

 

d.         updated movement diagrams demonstrating access to the Type G and Type B loading spaces;

 

e.         signing for small car parking spaces to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Transportation Services;

 

f.          appropriate mitigation of wind impacts on Wellesley Street West and on the development's outdoor amenity areas; and

 

g.         appropriate privacy screens, glazing, and window placement with respect to terraces and residential windows within 5.5 metres of the site's east property line.

 

6.         City Council approve the application to demolish the 161 existing residential units, of which 78 are residential rental housing units, located at 951-961 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363, subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of rental housing:

 

a.         The owner shall provide and maintain at least seventy-eight (78) replacement rental housing units on the subject site for a period of at least 20 years, comprising 16 bachelor units, at least thirty-seven 1-bedroom or greater units and at least twenty-five 2-bedroom units, of which at least 28 units shall have mid-range rents and as further detailed in the draft zoning by-law.

 

b.         The owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance including the right for eligible tenants to return to a replacement rental housing unit and compensation for moving to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and as further detailed in the draft zoning by-law.

 

c.         The owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in 6.a. and b. above and as described in the draft zoning by-law amendment to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

d.         The owner shall enter into and register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands comprising the 78 replacement rental units, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or her designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands.

 

7.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for any of the existing rental housing buildings in either phase of the development after the latest of the following has occurred:

 

a.         satisfaction of, or the securing of, conditions in Recommendation 6;

 

b.         Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments permitting the development have come into full force and effect; and

 

c.         the issuance of the Site Plan Approval for the development by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

8.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 7.

 

9.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a demolition permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than issuance of the first building permit of the development, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 7, in the report (May 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         the owner complete a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the day demolition of the residential units commences; and

 

b.         should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 9.a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

10.       City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 37 and Section 111 Agreements.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The former Sutton Place Hotel is located at 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West.  The applicant proposes renovations and additions to the Sutton Place Hotel building to create a mixed-use building with a total of 727 residential units and ancillary retail uses at grade.  The proposed additions to the building include a 9-storey addition to the top of the existing tower, increasing the height of the tower from 32 storeys to 41 storeys, and additions to the base of the building to create an 8-storey podium. The proposal includes 78 residential rental units to replace those rental units to be demolished as part of the proposal. The proponent has also submitted a Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion application.

 

The form and scale of the proposed development is appropriate within the context of the area. The proposal will result in improvements to the adjacent public realm. It will have acceptable impacts on the surrounding area and provide rental replacement consistent with the intent of the Official Plan.  Tenant assistance and compensation will be secured to meet City standards.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The report recommends provisions to secure a parking standard higher than that proposed by the applicant. This report also recommends approval of the application for Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59041.pdf
Attachment 10 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment - 951-971 Bay Street and 36 Wellesley Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59535.pdf

Speakers

Kim Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP
Chris Nanos, Radke Films
Marc A. Lean, Dickinson Wright PLLC
Jon Galama

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Rick Whitten-Stovall, External Vice President, Bay Cloverhill Community Association (TE.Supp.TE25.10.1)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Chris Nanos (TE.Supp.TE25.10.2)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Bruce H. Engell, WeirFoulds LLP (TE.Supp.TE25.10.3)

Communications (City Council)

(July 12, 2013) E-mail from Chris Nanos (CC.Supp.TE25.10.4)

TE25.11 - Final Report - 145-185 Davenport Road - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 1129 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 145-185 Davenport Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 145-185 Davenport Road to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.          An indexed payment of $200,000, to be paid within 30 days of the Site Specific Zoning By-law coming into full force and effect.  The funds are to be used for local streetscape improvements to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the local Ward Councillor, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

ii.         An indexed payment of $100,000, to be paid within 30 days of the Site Specific Zoning By-law coming into full force and effect.  The funds are to be used towards capital improvements to Ramsden Park, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

iii.        An indexed payment of $150,000, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit.  The funds are to be used for local streetscape improvements to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the local Ward Councillor, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

iv.        An indexed payment of $450,000, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit.  The funds are to be used for streetscape improvements, specifically the utility burial initiative to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

v.         An indexed payment of $100,000, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit.  The funds are to be used towards capital improvements to affordable housing in Ward 27 to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division in consultation with the Ward Councillor, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Site Plan Agreement and the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.          The owner shall incorporate in the construction of the building, and thereafter maintain, exterior building and landscape materials, including but not limited to limestone and brick, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

ii.         The Owner shall provide and maintain an at-grade "pet friendly" area with disposal facilities for the residents of the proposed building at 145-185 Davenport Road and the mixed-use building at 133 Hazelton Avenue.

 

iii.        The Owner shall provide and maintain privacy screening and/or landscaping on the second floor patio to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The application to amend the Zoning By-law proposes to construct a new 12-storey (40-metre tall, plus elevator overrun) mixed-use building, with ground floor retail and residential units above for the property at 145-185 Davenport Road.  The proposal calls for a maximum of 110 residential units with the option to provide 640 square metres of office space on a portion of the second floor.  A 5-level below-grade parking garage is proposed to accommodate 124 vehicular parking spaces, including 97 spaces for residential use, 10 spaces for the office use (or additional residential if no office is built), 12 spaces for residential visitors, and 5 spaces for retail.

 

The proposed development complies with the development criteria for Mixed Used Areas and Downtown Official Plan policies.  The development proposal also meets the applicable local policies and guidelines.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 145-185 Davenport Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58820.pdf

TE25.13 - Final Report - 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Sultan Street and 11 St. Thomas Street - Zoning Amendment Application (Removal of the Holding Symbol "H")

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 1082 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 1049-2012 to remove the Holding Symbol "(h)", for the lands at 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Sultan Street and 11 St. Thomas Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (May 17, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 17, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to remove the Holding Symbol (h) from the Zoning By-law for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Sultan Street and 11 St. Thomas Street to permit construction of a 9-storey office building on the site.

 

The application is consistent with the previous planning approvals for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Sultan Street and 11 St. Thomas Street.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to remove the Holding Symbol (h) from the Zoning By-law for 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Sultan Street and 11 St. Thomas Street.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 17, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Sultan Street and 11 St. Thomas Street - Zoning Amendment Application (Removal of the Holding Symbol "H") - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58699.pdf

TE25.14 - Supplementary Report - 40 The Esplanade (Now Known as 22, 26, 38 and 42 The Esplanade and 1 and 5 Scott Street) - City-Initiated Amendment to Official Plan Amendment No. 342 and Site Specific Zoning By-law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 1110 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Official Plan Amendment 342 to reallocate the portion of the Section 37 financial contribution for the lands now known as 22, 26, 38 and 42 The Esplanade and 1 and 5 Scott Street (formerly 40 The Esplanade) originally directed towards the creation of a municipal park, to local parkland creation or improvements and/or local streetscape enhancement projects, including in particular the Market Street Streetscape Improvement Project and improvements to Scott Lane and Scott Street in the vicinity of such lands as set out in this report, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend Site Specific Zoning By-law No. 26-2007 to reallocate the portion of the Section 37 financial contribution as set out in Recommendation 1 of this report, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the report (May 24, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with relevant City staff, to amend site specific Official Plan Amendment 342, Site Specific Zoning By-law No. 26-2007 and the registered Section 37 Agreement for such lands to reflect the reallocation of the $700,000 (and accumulated interest) cash contribution as set out in Recommendations 1 and 2.

 

4.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to the above, including execution of the amending Section 37 Agreement and appropriate redistribution of the original cash contribution made to the City by the owner as applicable.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

By way of Order No. 2799 issued on October 3, 2006, the Ontario Municipal Board approved Official Plan Amendment No. 342 (By-law No. 25-2007) of the Official Plan for the former City of Toronto and site specific Zoning By-law No. 26-2007 to permit a mixed use development with two residential condominium towers and retail uses at grade on the lands known in 2006 as 40 The Esplanade, now known as 22, 26, 38 and 42 The Esplanade and 1 and 5 Scott Street (the "subject Lands").  A Section 37 Agreement was entered into, which required the Owner of the lands to, amongst other matters, contribute $700,000 (with indexing) towards the creation of a municipal park on the lands bordered by The Esplanade, Market Street, Wilton Street and Lower Jarvis Street (known municipally as 125 The Esplanade).

 

This report recommends that Official Plan Amendment 342 and By-law No. 26-2007 be amended to direct the Section 37 funds originally allocated for the creation of the park to be reallocated to local parkland creation or improvements and/or local streetscape enhancement projects, including in particular the Market Street Streetscape Improvement Project and improvements to Scott Lane and Scott Street in the vicinity of the Subject Lands.

 

The Market Street Streetscape Improvement Project is a road narrowing and flexible boulevard project on Market Street between Front Street East and The Esplanade, less than two blocks east of the subject property.  Any remaining unused portion of the funds would be directed to local parkland creation or improvements and/or local streetscape enhancement projects.

 

This report further recommends that the Section 37 Agreement for the Subject Lands be amended to reflect the reallocation of the $700,000.00 cash contribution (now approximately $738,674.00 with interest).

 

The address of this development was changed in 2009 from 40 The Esplanade to 22, 26, 38 and 42 The Esplanade and 1 and 5 Scott Street.  Previous staff reports, Council decisions and communications with the public have referenced this development using the 40 The Esplanade address. The implementing Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments will reflect the current municipal addresses.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 40 the Esplanade (Now Known as 22, 26, 38 and 42 The Esplanade and 1 and 5 Scott Street) - City-Initiated Amendment to Official Plan Amendment No. 342 and Site Specific Zoning By-law - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59020.pdf

Speakers

Uznanski Zygmunt

14a - Final Report - 40 The Esplanade - City Initiated Amendment to Site Specific Zoning By-law

Origin
(May 13, 2013) Letter from City Council
Summary

City Council on May 7, 8, 9 and 10, 2013, referred Item TE21.13 back to the Toronto East
York Community Council and directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City
Planning to prepare a draft Official Plan Amendment for the proposed reallocation for the
property at 40 The Esplanade for consideration at a statutory public meeting at the June 18,
2013 Toronto and East York Community Council meeting.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 13, 2013) Decision Item from City Council - Final Report - 40 The Esplanade - City Initiated Amendment to Site Specific Zoning By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59193.pdf

TE25.15 - Final Report - 55 Howie Avenue - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bill 1074 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 55 Howie Avenue, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (May 23, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (May 23, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

2.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 55 Howie Avenue as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to the report (May 23, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

3.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

4.         Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.

 

5.         Prior to obtaining the written consent of the Chief Planner or her designate, as provided for in Recommendation No. 4, City Council require that the owner of the subject lands shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, that appropriate agreements have been executed and registered on title to secure, among other things, the maintenance of the shared access driveways, storm sewers and appurtenances, and the fire hydrant and watermain.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.

 

7.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

8.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 23, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a common elements condominium for the private driveway and laneway system, visitor parking areas, walkways and hydro pad area on the lands at 55 Howie Avenue in order to provide legal access to 42 residential townhouse units and to ensure shared ownership and maintenance of the common elements by the condominium corporation.

 

The requested exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act is required in order to permit the creation of conveyable lots for the 42 residential dwellings.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption. In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 23, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 55 Howie Avenue - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58841.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 8, 2013) E-mail from Anne Chan (TE.Supp.TE25.15.1)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Susie FitzPatrick (TE.Supp.TE25.15.2)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Eileen P. Costello, Aird & Berlis LLP (TE.Supp.TE25.15.3)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Eugene Fung, Vivian Chan, Henry Fong, Crysteen Xiao, Frederick Ling, Claudia Tse, Jarek Kozlowski, Andrew Gotowiec, Timothy Shiu, James Scott, Edward Wang, Scott O'donoghue, Geoff Lawrence and Neil Calhoun (TE.Supp.TE25.15.4)

TE25.16 - Final Report - 90 Eastdale Avenue and 2 Secord Avenue - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
31 - Beaches-East York

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the application to demolish 22 existing residential rental units located at 90 Eastdale Avenue (92-108 and Unit 101A) and 2 Secord Avenue (Units 8-18 and 40-50) pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of rental housing as outlined in the report dated (May 31, 2013) from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District:

 

a.         the owner shall provide and maintain 24 residential rental units on the subject site as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, all of which shall be three-bedroom stacked townhouse units, of which at least 10 shall have affordable rents and 14 shall have rents no higher than mid-range rents;

 

b.         the owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance including the right for the eligible tenants to move into a rental replacement unit or an available existing rental unit that is to be retained on the site, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

c.         the owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in 1.a. and b. above and as described in the final form of the zoning by-law amendment to be approved by the Ontario Municipal Board, and to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; and

 

d.         the owner shall enter into and register, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act (to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor) agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the 24 rental replacement units, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or her designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the latest of the following has occurred:

 

a.         satisfaction of the conditions in Recommendation 1;

 

b.         after the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments to be approved by the Ontario Municipal Board have come into full force and effect; and

 

c.         the issuance of the Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2.

 

4.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the date the 24 rental replacement units are ready and available for occupancy, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 2, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         the owner erect a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

b.         should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 4.a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

5.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 111 Agreements.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application for a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 proposes to demolish 22 residential rental units comprising 21 three-bedroom row townhouses and one three-bedroom apartment on the subject lands at 2 Secord Avenue and 90 Eastdale Avenue, and to replace them with 24 three-bedroom stacked townhouse units.

 

Tenants affected by the demolition will have the right to move into the new rental replacement units and will receive financial assistance with the relocation.  The Applicant has approval from the Ontario Municipal Board for Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments to permit a new 24-storey apartment building and the new rental replacement stacked townhouse units while retaining two rental apartment buildings containing 686 rental units and 31 rental townhouses.

 

This report's recommendations are in regard to the rental demolition application on the subject site under Municipal Code Chapter 667, pursuant to the City of Toronto Act.  City Council gave staff direction to settle the appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board based on, among other matters, that the applicant submit an application under Chapter 667 for the demolition and replacement of the affected rental units.

 

This report recommends approval of a Section 111 permit under Chapter 667 and Chapter 363 for the demolition of the 22 existing rental units affected by the new infill development, subject to conditions.  The conditions include the full replacement of 24 rental units and the provision of tenant relocation assistance, including the right for tenants to move into a rental unit in the new building.  An agreement under Section 111 will secure these conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 90 Eastdale Avenue and 2 Secord Avenue - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59029.pdf

TE25.17 - Final Report - 303 Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Bill 1076 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 303 Kingston Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (May 21, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible form 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

4.         City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illuminations, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

 

5.         City Council request the General Manager of Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, to investigate and monitor traffic and parking related issues resulting from increased vehicles generated by the development at 303 Kingston Road and recommend any traffic calming measures on Haslett, Rhyl and Elmer Avenues which are appropriate.

 

6.         City Council direct the applicant to create a Construction Liaison Committee with local residents and that the Ward Councillor be informed of any meetings.

 

7.         City Council direct the applicant to install signage at their sole expense, indicating no right turns are permitted from the end of the development's driveway onto Haslett Avenue.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 18, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a six-storey plus mezzanine mixed-use building with 47 residential units, 5 commercial units and underground parking at 303 Kingston Road.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 303 Kingston Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59021.pdf

Speakers

David Butler

Communications (Community Council)

(May 25, 2013) E-mail from Yan Cindy Sun (TE.Main.TE25.17.1)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from John Day (TE.Supp.TE25.17.2)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Brian Graff (TE.Supp.TE25.17.3)

TE25.18 - Request for Direction Report - 103, 109-111 Ossington Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Communications TE25.18.31 to TE25.18.33 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to negotiate with all entities given Party Status before the Ontario Municipal Board with the goal of achieving a full settlement that considers the existing zoning for the site as well as the visioning principles and recommendations for 103, 109-111 Ossington Avenue as outlined by the community, and authorize the City Solicitor to enter into minutes of settlement if a full settlement with all Parties is achieved.

 

2.         In the event that a satisfactory settlement cannot be reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to hire outside planners to oppose the applicants’ appeal respecting the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 103, 109-111 Ossington Avenue (File Number 12-122813 STE 19 OZ) and Site Plan application (File Number 12-122807 STE 19 SA), and to attend any Ontario Municipal Board Hearings in opposition to such appeal.

Origin

(May 16, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to redevelop the property at 103-111 Ossington Avenue with a 6-storey mixed use building comprising ground floor retail/commercial, 86 residential units and 2 levels of below grade parking.

 

This report advises Council that the applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law amendment and Site Plan application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and seeks direction regarding representation at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing and negotiations with the applicant to resolve the issues identified in this report.

 

The proposal does not demonstrate adequate transition in height, scale and intensity from the stable residential area to the east.  The rear massing of the proposed building requires additional stepping back and the height requires reduction.

 

Planning staff have been in discussions with the applicant about changes to the height, massing and amenity space to try to reach a settlement. To date no revisions have been submitted.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 16, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 103, 109-111 Ossington Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58823.pdf

Speakers

Daphne Ballon on behalf of Jessica Wilson, Ossington Community Association
Jennifer Horvath
Alison Brooks
Anika Juzda
Peter Nitsch
Rob Corkum
Jamie Angell
Michael Sims
Harry Kondratas
Scot Blythe
Anita Goncalves
Penny Carter
Robert Wasserman on behalf of Benj Hellie
Jennifer Jimenez
Jennifer Jimenez on behalf of Sol Chrom
Eileen Denny, CORRA
Laura Bowman, Associate Lawyer, Iler Campbell LLP
David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) E-mail from Charles Campbell, Iler Campbell LLP (TE.Main.TE25.18.1)
(June 6, 2013) E-mail from Benj Hellie, Ossington Community (TE.Supp.TE25.18.2)
(June 11, 2013) E-mail from Ilana Gutman (TE.Supp.TE25.18.3)
(June 12, 2013) E-mail from Steven Heuchert, Rachel Monkton-Joffre, Denis Hunealt-Joffre, Rose Couhino-Drudge and Claire Smith (TE.Supp.TE25.18.4)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Rachel Horvath (TE.Supp.TE25.18.5)
(June 13, 2013) E-mail from Laura Bowman, Iler Campbell LLP, representing the Ossington Community Association (TE.Supp.TE25.18.6)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Stephen Bulger (TE.Supp.TE25.18.7)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Jamie Angell, Owner/Director, Angell Gallery (TE.Supp.TE25.18.8)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Alison Brooks (TE.Supp.TE25.18.9)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Dani Elwell (TE.Supp.TE25.18.10)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Michael Turney (TE.Supp.TE25.18.11)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Sol Chrom (TE.Supp.TE25.18.12)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Breck McFarlane (TE.Supp.TE25.18.13)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, President, Ossington Community Association (TE.Supp.TE25.18.14)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Paula Bowley (TE.Supp.TE25.18.15)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Benj Hellie (TE.Supp.TE25.18.16)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Scot Blythe (TE.Supp.TE25.18.17)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Michele Mondoux (TE.Supp.TE25.18.18)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Mike Law (TE.Supp.TE25.18.19)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, CORRA (The Confederation of Residents and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto) (TE.Supp.TE25.18.20)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Roman Pawlyshyn (TE.Supp.TE25.18.21)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Michelle Bruner (TE.Supp.TE25.18.22)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Paul Mezei (TE.Supp.TE25.18.23)
(June 17, 2013) E-mail from Eddie Lombardi (TE.Supp.TE25.18.24)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Rob Corkum (TE.Supp.TE25.18.25)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Allana Harkin (TE.Supp.TE25.18.26)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Shan Gordon (TE.Supp.TE25.18.27)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Michelle Dooley (TE.Supp.TE25.18.28)
(June 18, 2013) Submission from Councillor Mike Layton, submitting a copy of a document entitled "Ossington Avenue: Dundas to Queen - Local Survey Results, Visioning Principles & Recommendations for the application for 103, 109-111 Ossington (TE.Supp.TE25.18.29)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Michael Clark and Luke Pest (TE.Supp.TE25.18.30)

Communications (City Council)

(June 19, 2013) E-mail from Tania Janthur (CC.Main.TE25.18.31)
(July 12, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, Barristers and Solicitors (CC.Supp.TE25.18.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39088.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Letter from Laura Bowman, Iler Campbell, LLP (CC.New.TE25.18.33)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39143.pdf

TE25.19 - Request for Direction Report - 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE25.19c for information)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council support a settlement for 24 Mercer Street (File 11 261965 STE 20 OZ), subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         that the building height be limited to 15 storeys and a maximum height of 57.5 metres;

 

b.         that the mechanical penthouse, including any stair and elevator areas be limited to a maximum height of 5.5 metres and a maximum area  of 89.0 metres;

 

c.         the building will extend to the lot line adjacent Mercer Street beginning at the 5th storey; and

 

d.         that the applicant obtain approval for the demolition of the heritage properties under the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

2.         City Council request the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff,  to support a settlement, subject to the above, respecting the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 24 Mercer Street (File 11 261965 STE 20 OZ), and attend any Ontario Municipal Board hearings relating to such appeal.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to report directly to City Council for its meeting on July 16, 2013 on any other technical issues to be secured and any necessary Heritage reporting for the proposed demolition of a property designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Origin

(August 8, 2012) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

City Council on November 27, 28 and 29, 2012, referred Item TE20.18, headed "Request for Direction Report - 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application", back to the January 22, 2012 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council for further consideration and directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report to the January 22, 2012 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council on further discussions with the applicant and on any potential settlement.

 

This application has been appealed by the Applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board.  It proposes to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the construction of a new 21-storey residential building.  The façade of the listed heritage building on the site is proposed to be retained.  The building would include 27 units and 4 levels of below-grade accessory use.  No vehicular parking is proposed.  Twenty-seven bicycle parking spaces are proposed on the ground floor.

 

The proposal represents over-development of the property contrary to the planning framework for King-Spadina.  The small size of the property makes it an inappropriate location for a tall building.  The proposed development would overwhelm the façade of the existing two and a half storey listed heritage building on the site which is proposed to be retained.  Its approval would set a negative precedent for future development that undermines the vision for this area of the City.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council’s direction for the City Solicitor, together with Planning and other appropriate City staff, to attend any Ontario Municipal Board hearing of the appeal in opposition to such proposal at the OMB.

 

The application in its current form is not supportable.  Of considerable concern to staff is the appropriateness of the massing of the proposed tall building built with no setback to the adjacent lot lines.  Also of concern is the loss of a significant portion of the heritage building with minimal retention of the built form and no sense of the existing building's scale, form and mass.  The absence of any vehicular parking is also an outstanding issue.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 8, 2012) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58597.pdf
(November 29, 2012) City Council Decision on TE20.18 - Request for Direction Report - 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58596.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 9, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application (TE25.19c)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60271.pdf

Speakers

Deborah Scott, 2071430 Ontario Inc.
Dawne Jubb

Communications (Community Council)

(January 20, 2013) E-mail from Ronn Mann, Sphinx Productions (TE.Main.TE25.19.1)
(January 20, 2013) E-mail from Jamie Angell, Director, Angell Gallery (TE.Main.TE25.19.2)
(March 15, 2012) Letter from Robert Adler, General Counsel, 15-35 Mercer St. Investments (TE.Main.TE25.19.3)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Tyler Sopik, Sales Representative, Avison Young Commercial Real Estate (Ontario) Inc. (TE.Main.TE25.19.4)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Andrew P. Danyliw, Barrister & Solicitor (TE.Main.TE25.19.5)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Kelly Driscoll (TE.Main.TE25.19.6)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Stephanie E. Calvet (TE.Main.TE25.19.7)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Saira Muzaffar (TE.Main.TE25.19.8)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from P.V. Pavitt (TE.Main.TE25.19.9)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Joe Rekab, Managing Partner, BTY Group (TE.Main.TE25.19.10)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Graeme E. McDonald, Managing Principal, NICHE Architectural Inc. (TE.Main.TE25.19.11)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Daniel Holland, VP Project Management, Tango Management (TE.Main.TE25.19.12)
(January 21, 2013) Letter from Nancy Regier, Rd&a (TE.Main.TE25.19.13)
(January 22, 2013) Submission from Allison Fox, E.R.A. Architects (TE.Main.TE25.19.14)
(June 15, 2013) E-mail from Graeme McDonald (TE.Supp.TE25.19.15)

19a - Supplementary Report - 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Origin
(January 17, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This application has been appealed by the Applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board.  It proposes to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the construction of a new 21-storey residential building.  A portion of the listed heritage building on the site (the building is now subject to an Intention to Designate under the Ontario Heritage Act) is proposed to be retained.  The building would include 22 units and 4 levels of below-grade accessory use.  No vehicular parking is proposed.  Twenty-three bicycle parking spaces are proposed.

 

At the November 6, 2012 Toronto and East York Community Council meeting a motion was approved directing staff to continue to work with the applicant to address tower separation and heritage issues as outlined in the staff report dated August 8, 2012 (TE20.18) as well as outstanding Technical Service matters.  Staff met with the applicant and provided a Supplementary Report to the November 27, 2012 meeting of Council stating that Planning staff continue to have concerns regarding the proposal.  Council adopted the report recommendation that staff report to the January 22, 2013 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council on further discussions with the applicant and any potential settlement.

 

Staff met with the applicant who has not been able to resolve the outstanding issues to the satisfaction of Planning staff.  Planning staff have clearly stated for the applicant that the heritage issues and designation of the building (currently the subject of a Conservation Review Board Hearing), will need to be resolved and additional information and revised reports are to be provided before staff can advise Council as to what an appropriate form of redevelopment would be for the property.  If the heritage issues are resolved, the applicant would still need to address tower separation, height and parking issues.

Background Information (Community Council)
(January 17, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58598.pdf

19b - Supplementary Report - 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Origin
(June 12, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This report provides further information on the application taking into account the recent report issued by the Conservation Review Board, advice from Heritage Preservation Services staff and revised plans submitted by the applicant on June 4, 2013.  Staff continue to oppose the proposal.

 

The rezoning application for 24 Mercer Street was appealed by the applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board on June 15, 2012.  It proposes to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the construction of a new 21-storey residential building.  The building would include 24 units and 2 levels of below-grade accessory use.  No vehicular parking is proposed.  Nineteen bicycle parking spaces are proposed.

 

A portion of the listed heritage building on the site is proposed to be retained.  The building is subject to an Intention to Designate under the Ontario Heritage Act and the matter was the subject of a report from the Conservation Review Board which was issued on May 6, 2013.  As the Conservation Review Board has provided their report, the applicant has requested that a pre-hearing conference be scheduled by the OMB to allow for issues to be scoped and a hearing to be scheduled.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 12, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 24 Mercer Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59531.pdf

TE25.20 - Conservation Review Board Report - Amendment of Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law - 24 Mercer Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1118 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that

 

1.         City Council pass a by-law designating the property at 24 Mercer Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

2.         City Council replace the original Reasons for Designation adopted by Council on March 4, 2012, with the Revised Reasons for Designation found in Attachment No. 3 to the report (May 25, 2013) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

Origin

(May 25, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Toronto City Council with advice on the decision of the Conservation Review Board (CRB) regarding Council's notice of intention to designate the property at 24 Mercer Street (Alexander Johnston House).  This report also provides recommendations to Council regarding the completion of the designation of the property.

 

On May 6, 2013, the CRB issued its decision resulting from the hearing for the appeal to the notice of intention to designate the property at 24 Mercer Street.  The CRB recommends that the subject property be protected under Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value or interest, but recommends that the third storey of the Alexander Johnston House be excluded as a heritage attribute in the Reasons for Designation.

 

In consideration of the decision of the CRB, this report also provides recommendations on changes to the original Reasons for Designation adopted by Council at its meeting of March 4, 2012.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 25, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Conservation Review Board Report - Amendment of Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law - 24 Mercer Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58737.pdf

Speakers

Deborah Scott, 2071430 Ontario Inc.
Dawne Jubb

Communications (Community Council)

(January 20, 2013) E-mail from Ron Mann, Sphinx Productions (TE.Supp.TE25.20.1)
(January 20, 2013) E-mail from Jamie Angell, Director, Angell Gallery (TE.Supp.TE25.20.2)
(March 15, 2012) Letter from Robert Adler, General Counsel, 15-35 Mercer St. Investments (TE.Supp.TE25.20.3)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Tyler Sopik, Sales Representative, Avison Young Commercial Real Estate (Ontario) Inc. (TE.Supp.TE25.20.4)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Andrew P. Danyliw, Barrister & Solicitor (TE.Supp.TE25.20.5)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Kelly Driscoll (TE.Supp.TE25.20.6)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Stephanie E. Calvet (TE.Supp.TE25.20.7)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Saira Muzaffar (TE.Supp.TE25.20.8)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from P.V. Pavitt (TE.Supp.TE25.20.9)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Joe Rekab, Managing Partner, BTY Group (TE.Supp.TE25.20.10)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Graeme E. McDonald, Managing Principal, NICHE Architectural Inc. (TE.Supp.TE25.20.11)
(January 21, 2013) E-mail from Daniel Holland, VP Project Management, Tango Management (TE.Supp.TE25.20.12)
(January 21, 2013) Letter from Nancy Regier, Rd&a (TE.Supp.TE25.20.13)
(January 22, 2013) Submission from Allison Fox, E.R.A. Architects (TE.Supp.TE25.20.14)
(June 15, 2013) E-mail from Graeme McDonald (TE.Supp.TE25.20.15)

20a - Conservation Review Board Report, Amendment of Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law - 24 Mercer Street

Origin
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2013 considered a report (May 25, 2013) from the  Director, Urban Design, Policy and Research, City Planning Division, respecting Conservation Review Board Report, Amendment of Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law - 24 Mercer Street.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Conservation Review Board Report, Amendment of Reasons for Designation and Passage of Designating By-law - 24 Mercer Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59109.pdf

TE25.21 - Request for Directions Report - 101 King Street East and 54-70 Colborne Street - Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention

The City Solicitor has submitted a revised supplementary report on this Item (TE25.21a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation.

Origin

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Municipal Board due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  A hearing date has not been set but is expected to be scheduled for September 2013.

 

The applicant is proposing a 25-storey mixed use building that is 77.5 metres in height (82.3 metres to the top of the mechanical penthouse) including an 11-storey base building.  The proposal includes 856.9 square metres of commercial uses at grade and 281 residential condominium units above.  The proposal also includes five levels of below-grade parking with 169 car parking spaces.

 

A detailed report is being prepared and will be submitted to Toronto and East York Community Council on June 18, 2013 or directly to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 101 King Street East and 54-70 Colborne Street - Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Directions Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58698.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 8, 2013) Revised supplementary report from the City Solicitor on 101 King Street East and 54-70 Colborne Street: Appeals re Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Applications - Request for Directions Report (TE25.21a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60288.pdf

TE25.22 - 375, 375R, and 381 Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE25.22a for information)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to provide notice of a statutory public meeting for 375, 375R, and 381 Queen Street West to be scheduled for the September 10, 2013 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council, as per the requirements of the Planning Act.

 

2.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to bring forward a draft zoning by-law based on the plans on file with the City Planning Division dated December 24, 2012 for the statutory public meeting for 375, 375R, and 381 Queen Street West to be scheduled for the September 10, 2013 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council, as per the requirements of the Planning Act.

 

3.         City Council direct that Real Estate Services to report to the September 9, 2013 meeting of Government Management Committee on the closure of the public laneway at this site.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested City Planning staff and the Ward Councillor to meet with the applicant to resolve any outstanding matters, including matters to be secured under section 37 of the Planning Act, and that the results of these discussions be reported directly to City Council for its meeting on July 16 and 17, 2013.

Origin

(April 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to redevelop the lands at 375, 375R, and 381 Queen Street West with a 7-storey non-residential building containing retail at grade and office uses above.

 

This report recommends refusal of the Zoning By-law amendment application.  The policies contained within the City of Toronto Official Plan provide the basis for refusing this proposal as it does not meet the intent of the Plan as it relates to the conservation of the City's heritage resources.  The proposed density and building height do not respect the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District Plan, nor does it affirm the Zoning By-law for the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District.  In addition, the proposal in its current form would destabilize the Heritage Conservation District by setting an inappropriate precedent and level of intensification, while other properties within the Heritage Conservation District have been restored and redeveloped in conformity with the Heritage Conservation District Guidelines.

 

The Ontario Heritage Act specifies that if a Heritage Conservation District Plan is in effect in a municipality, Council shall not carry out any public work in the district that is contrary to the objectives set out in the plan, or pass a by-law for any purpose that is contrary to the objectives set out in the Heritage Conservation District Plan.

 

Staff recommend that City Council refuse the proposal, and that Staff support Council’s refusal of the proposed development should the application be appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This report also seeks Council's direction for staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in opposition to the development should the application be appealed.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 375, 375R and 381 Queen Street West - Zoning Amendment Application - Refusal Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58566.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 10, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division (TE25.22a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60323.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 6, 2013) Letter from Ralph Daley, President, Grange Community Association (TE.Main.TE25.22.1)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Brian Graff (TE.Supp.TE25.22.2)

TE25.23 - Construction of a Replacement Structure Within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District - 375-381 Queen Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to report to the September 10, 2013 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council on any amendments and provide appropriate notice that may be required for the approval of the proposed development at 375, 375R, and 381 Queen Street West, as shown on the plans dated December 24, 2012 and on file with City Planning Division.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and the City Solicitor to report to the September 10, 2013 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council on how to establish 16m in height as an objective instead of a guideline for all non-corner buildings within the Queen Street Heritage Conservation District, and include similar recommendations to bring the angular plane guidelines forward as objectives.

Origin

(May 10, 2013) Letter from City Council

Summary

City Council on May 7, 8, 9 and 10, 2013, referred Item TE23.21 back to the Toronto East York Community Council and requested the City Solicitor to submit a report to the Toronto and East York Community Council on:

 

a.         the implications of exceeding 16m in height within the Queen Street Heritage Conservation District; and

 

b.         how to establish 16m in height as an objective instead of a guideline for all noncorner buildings within the Queen Street Heritage Conservation District, and include similar recommendations to bring the angular plane guidelines forward as objectives.

 

This report recommends that City Council refuse the proposed development within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District as it is not compatible with the District Guidelines.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 10, 2013) Decision Item from City Council - Construction of a Replacement Structure Within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District - 375-381 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58587.pdf
(March 18, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Construction of a Replacement Structure Within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District - 375-381 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58588.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(April 3, 2013) Letter from Eileen Costello, Aird and Berlis LLP (TE.Main.TE25.23.1)
(May 4, 2013) Letter from Ralph Daley, President, Grange Community Association (TE.Main.TE25.23.2)
(June 18, 2013) E-mail from Brian Graff (TE.Supp.TE25.23.3)

23a - Construction of a Replacement Structure Within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District - 375-381 Queen Street West

Origin
(April 2, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on March 27, 2013, considered the following:

 

1.         Report (March 18, 2013) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division – Construction of a Replacement Structure within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District – 375-381 Queen Street West.

 

2.         Letter (March 25, 2013) from Michael R. Emory, President & CEO, Allied Properties REIT (PB.Supp.PB21.3.1).

 

3.         E-mail (March 26, 2013) from Kim K. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP (PB.Supp.PB21.3.2)

 

4.         E-mail (March 26, 2013) from Michael McClelland, Principal, E.R.A. Architects Inc. (PB.Supp.PB21.3.3)

 

5.         Submission (March 27, 2013) from Dermot Sweeny, Sweeny Sterling Finlayson & Co Architects Inc. (PB.Supp.PB21.3.4)

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

-           Kim Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP

-           Dermot Sweeny, Sweeny Sterling Finlayson & Co Architects Inc. (Submission Filed)

Background Information (Community Council)
(April 2, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Construction of a Replacement Structure within the Queen Street West Heritage Conservation District - 375-381 Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58589.pdf

23b - Amendment of Heritage Conservation District Plans

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege
Origin
(May 7, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor
Summary

This report provides legal advice with respect to the process for amending Heritage Conservation District plans and the implications of related guidelines.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 7, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor - Amendment of Heritage Conservation District Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58590.pdf

TE25.25 - 523, 525 and 525A Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to provide notice of a statutory public meeting for the revised development proposal relating to the property municipally known as 525 Adelaide Street West (the “Site”) currently scheduled for the September 10, 2013 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council, as per the requirements of the Planning Act provided that Community Planning has confirmed receipt of a formally revised application from the Owner satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to submit to the September 10, 2013 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council a report with appropriate recommendations for the development which includes drafting a Zoning By-law Amendment in a form which provides for:

 

a.         the development of the site as proposed by the Owner based on the most recent architectural plans submitted February 14, 2013, prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited, as revised on June 11, 2013, to include the following revisions:

 

i.          the height of the building is to be limited to 17 storeys and 50.5 metres;

 

ii.         the building shall incorporate a stepback of 2 metres above the 7th floor adjacent to the proposed private driveway and the property at 103-111 Bathurst Street to the west;

 

iii.        the portion of the building adjacent to Adelaide Street West shall be stepped back a minimum of 9.5 metres from Adelaide Street West above the 14th storey;

 

iv.        the proposed development shall comply with the City's Vibrant Streets design guidelines;

 

b.         the requirement for the owner of the Site to enter into a Section 37 Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner to secure the following matters, services and facilities prior to introduction of Bills for enactment:

 

i.          The Owner shall provide a public park at grade (strata title) of a minimum size of approximately 649 square metres, in accordance with the following:

 

A.        the owner will construct the public park at the owner’s expense and the final configuration and design of the public park, including grading, soil depth and improvements shall be to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor, in consultation with the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation as well as the Director of Urban Design, following consultation with a Working Committee that will include representation from the surrounding community; and

 

B.        the owner shall convey by way of strata title the public park to the City and implement the required base park and above-base park improvements prior to registration of the condominium on the Site to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, subject to securing any outstanding improvement items related to seasonality by letter of credit; and

 

C.        the owner shall maintain the public park at its expense in a manner satisfactory to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation and shall indemnify the City for failure of its maintenance obligations; and

 

a.         Prior to conveyance of the parkland, the Owner shall be responsible for an environmental assessment of the Parkland and any associated costs or remediation works required as a result of that assessment.  Such assessment or remediation shall ensure that the Parkland will meet all applicable laws, regulations and guidelines respecting sites to be used for public park purposes, including City Council policies respecting soil remediation of sites.  A qualified environmental consultant acceptable to the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services shall prepare the environmental assessment.  Prior to transferring the Parkland to the City, the environmental assessment shall be peer reviewed by an environmental consultant retained by the City at the Owner's expense (the "Peer Reviewer"), and the transfer of the Parkland shall be conditional upon the Peer Reviewer concurring with the Owner's environmental consultant that the Parkland meets all applicable laws, regulations and guidelines for public park purposes.

 

b.         The Owner's environmental consultant shall file a Record of Site Condition (RSC) on the Ontario’s Environmental Site Registry and submit to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation the Ministry of the Environment’s (MOE) Letter of Acknowledgement of Filing of the Record of Site Condition (RSC) confirming that the RSC has been prepared and filed in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04 and that the MOE will not audit the RSC at this time or that the RSC has passed an MOE audit.

 

ii.         Provision of a cash contribution to the City in the amount of $775,000 to be provided and allocated as follows:

 

A.        $50,000 cash contribution to the Factory Lab Theatre to be paid within fifteen (15) business days of the zoning by-law amendment becoming final and binding;

 

B.        $225,000 cash contribution to be allocated for streetscape improvements in the vicinity of the Site to be paid prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit;

 

C.        $500,000 cash contribution for capital improvements to and/or acquisition of Affordable Housing in Ward 20 to be paid prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit; and

 

D.        Subsections ii. and iii. above are to be indexed from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

iii.        The Owner shall incorporate into the construction of the building, exterior materials substantially in accordance with architectural drawings (1:50 scale) as originally prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited, dated February 14, 2013 with appropriate revision to reflect the revised June 11, 2013 submission and shall be submitted for approval in the context of the application for Site Plan approval for the development.

 

iv.        The owner shall provide a public pedestrian access easement to the City in the location as provided for in the aforementioned June 11, 2013 architectural plans, with such easement lands to be maintained by the condominium corporation.

 

v.         The Owner shall provide a minimum of 10% of the dwelling units constructed on the lot as three-bedroom units.

 

vi.        The Owner shall incorporate knock-out panels, where feasible without material structural modification, to enable the conversion of units with fewer bedrooms to 3-bedroom units and include appropriate provision(s) in any condominium documents to enable any such conversions in the future.

 

vii.       All conveyances to the City, including easements, shall be for nominal consideration, free and clear of encumbrances and at no cost to the City to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Owner shall be responsible to prepare, submit to the City for approval and deposit all required reference plans to describe the lands being conveyed.

 

3.         City Council require that the public park conveyance provided by the Owner shall be to the Owner’s satisfaction in full of its parkland conveyance requirements and/or any cash-in-lieu of parkland payment required by the City under Chapter 415, Article III of the Municipal Code, and City staff shall be authorized to make a site-specific amendment to Chapter 415 of the Municipal Code as may be necessary to implement the parkland contribution credit, such that there shall be no cash owing by the Owner, and further:

 

a.         Appraisal Services staff shall evaluate the value of the strata conveyance in comparison with the value of the unencumbered parkland conveyance requirement.  The value of the above base parkland improvements cannot be less than the difference in value between the strata conveyance and the value of the unencumbered parkland dedication requirement.

 

b.         The Owner shall enter into an agreement, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, respecting indemnification for the City to protect the City against any future costs to repair the garage below the strata public park and that the Owner be required to pay any future costs to reinstate the public park should the garage structure require repair in the future.

Origin

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The application proposes to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit the construction of a mixed-use development of a 21-storey mixed-use building (62.9 metres to the top of the roof and an additional 5.4 metres to the top of the mechanical penthouse for an overall height of 68.4 metres) with retail uses at grade and 454 units above.  Included in the proposal are 362 parking spaces in four levels of below-grade parking to serve the project located in a below grade parking facility.

 

The proposal also includes the provision of lands for a future public park.  It is being proposed that the park would be based on a stratified land ownership with the condominium corporation retaining ownership of the underground parking beneath the proposed park.  The maintenance of the public park would be the responsibility of the condominium corporation.

 

The proposed vehicular access is off Adelaide Street West using a private driveway which is proposed to be shared with the proposed development to the west at 103-111 Bathurst Street.

 

The proposal represents over-development of the property contrary to the planning framework for King-Spadina.  Located in the interior of the West Precinct of the King-Spadina Secondary Plan area where buildings are predominantly 35 metres or less in height, the 68 metres proposed is not supportable.  The proposed building is also taller than nearby buildings on Bathurst Street, a major arterial street and does not provide appropriate stepping or separation distances to adjacent existing and approved developments.  If approved as proposed, the building would detract from the heritage and mid-rise character of the area and set a precedent for additional height where it is not planned and set a negative precedent for the form of future development.

 

City Planning recommends that Council refuse the zoning by-law amendment application as submitted.  City Planning staff are willing to continue discussions on a more modest proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 523, 525 and 525A Adelaide Street West - Zoning Amendment - Refusal Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59126.pdf

TE25.26 - City-Initiated Study for the West Side of Roncesvalles Avenue, Between Marmaduke Street and Marion Street - Proposals Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information the draft performance standards for the review of applications for small-scale retail, service and office uses on the west side of Roncesvalles Avenue, between Marmaduke Street and Marion Street attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 22, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council directed that:

 

1.         Staff schedule a community consultation meeting together with the Ward Councillor to present the draft performance standards and refine them as necessary.

 

2.         Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the study area.

 

3.         The Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the fourth quarter of 2013 on the final form of the performance standards.

Origin

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

City Planning staff have completed the land use study on the suitability of certain non-residential uses on the west side of Roncesvalles Avenue, between Marmaduke Street and Marion Street (the study area) as directed by Toronto and East York Community Council on June 22, 2011. Based on the study results, City Planning staff recommends maintaining the existing Zoning By-law provisions and establishing a set of performance standards for the consideration of future non-residential use proposals in the study area, once the draft performance standards are subject to consultation with area landowners and the community.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - City-Initiated Study for the West Side of Roncesvalles Avenue, Between Marmaduke Street and Marion Street - Proposals Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59035.pdf

Speakers

Jeffery Hanning, Sunnyside Community Association

Communications (Community Council)

(June 15, 2013) Fax from Ted Ross (TE.Supp.TE25.26.1)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from David W. Oleson (TE.Supp.TE25.26.2)

TE25.27 - North Downtown Yonge Street Planning Framework - Draft Official Plan Amendment and Urban Design Guidelines - Status Update Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the "Draft North Downtown Yonge Urban Design Guidelines", attached as Attachment 3 to the report (June 6, 2013)  from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

2.         City Council direct staff to use the Draft North Downtown Yonge Urban Design Guidelines in the evaluation of all new and current tall building development proposals falling within the Guideline boundaries.

 

3.         City Council direct staff to schedule a community consultation meeting with the Working Group prior to September 10, 2013 for review of a Draft Official Plan Amendment for the lands included in the North Downtown Yonge Planning Framework together with the Ward Councillor.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to provide notice of a statutory public meeting for the North Downtown Yonge Planning Framework to be scheduled for the September 10, 2013 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council, as per the requirements of the Planning Act.

 

5.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to bring forward a draft Official Plan Amendment for the statutory public meeting for the North Downtown Yonge Planning Framework to be scheduled for the September 10, 2013 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council, as per the requirements of the Planning Act.

 

6.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back to the Economic Development Committee regarding the extension of the Yonge Street Culture Corridor north from Dundas Street to Davenport Road.

 

7.         City Council request the Director, Public Realm to report on opportunities for streetscape improvements in the North Downtown Yonge Planning Area, including unimproved boulevard locations, and to report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council at the statutory public meeting for the draft Official Plan Amendment to be held on September 10, 2013.

 

 8.        City Council request staff to incorporate wording into the final North Downtown Yonge Urban Design Guidelines and the draft Official Plan Amendment to provide a maximum width for retail store-fronts at grade in new development or redevelopment along Yonge Street between Charles Street and College/Carlton Streets that is in keeping with the average width of at grade retail that is currently found along Yonge Street.

Origin

(June 11, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report provides an overview of the study process to date and the next steps to finalizing the North Downtown Yonge Planning Framework (NDYPF).  In response to the Downtown Tall Buildings Study and to address the amount and type of development occurring and anticipated in the area, Toronto and East York Community Council at the meeting of June 22, 2011 through development application 11 187996 STE 27 OZ for 501 to 521 Yonge directed staff to undertake the North Downtown Yonge Street Planning Framework process and community consultation as outlined in the Preliminary Report dated May 30, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

The NDYPF area is generally bounded by College/Carlton Streets, Bloor Street, fronting properties on the west side of Bay Street and fronting properties on the east side of Church Street.  The original direction of the NDYPF was to provide urban design guidelines to direct development within the study area.  As the study process evolved, it was determined that an official plan amendment with area specific policies should also be drafted to provide a policy framework with urban design guidelines as the implementation tool.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 11, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - North Downtown Yonge Planning Framework - Draft Official Plan Amendment and Urban Design Guidelines - Status Update Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59504.pdf
Attachment 4 - Draft Toronto Urban Design Guidelines - North Downtown Yonge
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59537.pdf
(May 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - North Downtown Yonge Street Planning Framework - College/Carlton Streets to Bloor Street - Draft Official Plan Amendment and Urban Design Guidelines - Status Update Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58860.pdf

Speakers

Peter Rex
Ann Hatch, Director, Development, Canadian Youth Business Foundation
Paul Farrelly, Vice President, Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Kathryn A. Holden, BCCA Member and Resident (TE.Supp.TE25.27.1)

TE25.28 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 127 Glen Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the request to demolish the structure on the designated heritage property at 127 Glen Road, an "unrated" property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District, in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act subject to the owner, prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, submitting photo-documentation of the existing structure at 127 Glen Road to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council approve the replacement structure at 127 Glen Road of an underground parking structure with a green roof as shown in the plans submitted by the applicant, including plans, section and elevation prepared by The Ventin Group Ltd. Architects and Sparling Landscape Architect all date stamped received by Heritage Preservation Services April 10, 2013 and May 2-3, 2013, on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and that the replacement structure and associated landscaping be constructed in accordance with the submitted plans, subject to the following condition:

 

a.         prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the proposed replacement structure at 127 Glen Road, the applicant will provide architectural drawings and a landscape plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

Origin

(May 2, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that Council approve the demolition of a designated property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and the construction of a replacement structure under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act. 

 

The proposal is to demolish an existing 2-storey stucco house at 127 Glen Road and to construct an underground parking garage with a green roof that will become part of the landscaping plan for the property. This property will become a side yard extension of the adjacent property at 35 Binscarth Road. The subject property has been evaluated as being "unrated" in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and, as per the District Plan, is not considered to be of national, provincial, city-wide or contextual heritage significance and does not contribute to the heritage character of the heritage conservation district.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 2, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 127 Glen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58631.pdf

28a - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 127 Glen Road

Origin
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on May 29, 2013, considered a report (May 2, 2013) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 127 Glen Road.

Background Information (Community Council)
(May 31, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property in the North Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Construction of a Replacement Structure - 127 Glen Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59112.pdf

TE25.54 - Assumption of Streets and Services - 1590 O'Connor Drive - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M - 2349 Blair, Tucker and Guillet Streets and Skopje Gate

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
31 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council assume the services installed along Blair, Tucker and Guillet Streets and Skopje Gate and that the City formally assume these roads which are shown on Plan 66M-2349.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Director, Engineering Review to release the performance guarantee held with respect to the municipal services in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement.

 

3.         City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highways and municipal services within the Plan of Subdivision 66M-2349.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plan of Subdivision 66M-2349 to Toronto Hydro.

 

6.         City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Engineering Review

Summary

This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the municipal roads and services of the subdivision located at 1590 O'Connor Drive, in accordance with the terms of the Subdivision Agreement for Plan 66M-2349, dated December 30, 1999, between Remington Homes (O’Connor) Inc. and the City of Toronto.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Engineering Review - Assumption of Streets and Services - 1590 O'Connor Drive - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M - 2349 Blair, Tucker and Guillet Streets and Skopje Gate
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58766.pdf

TE25.55 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 245 Queens Quay West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1126 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes:

 

            -           245 Queens Quay West.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 245 Queens Quay West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58805.pdf
Attachment - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 245 Queens Quay West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58826.pdf

TE25.57 - 88 Scott Street - Public Art Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 88 Scott Street Public Art Program as attached to the report (May 29, 2013) from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from Director, Urban Design

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 88 Scott Street Public Art Program. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art in the publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.

 

This public art plan provides a framework for a public art commission including the introduction, site context plan, Public Art Program objectives, public art locations, mentorship program, budget, selection process, jury composition and schedule.  The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Design - 88 Scott Street - Public Art Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58859.pdf

TE25.66 - Planning and Revitalizing Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to develop, in consultation with the Waterfront BIA, the St. Lawrence BIA, the Financial District BIA, the Downtown Yonge BIA, the Bloor Yorkville BIA, the Garden District Residents Association, the McGill-Granby Residents Association, the Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association, the Bay Cloverhill Community Association, the Greater Yorkville Residents Association, the Bloor East Neighbourhood Association, the Collier-Asquith Residents Association, the Avenue Bay Cottingham Residents Association, the York Quay Neighbourhood Association, the St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association and the local Ward Councillors, a strategy to improve the streetscape and retail conditions of Yonge Street between the lakefront and Davenport Road and report the outcomes to the Toronto and East York Community Council for its meeting on October 17, 2013.

Origin

(May 13, 2013) Report from City Council

Summary

Yonge Street is an important cultural corridor that serves as “Canada’s Main Street”.  The stretch of Yonge from the waterfront to Davenport Road borders on five Business Improvement Areas and ten Resident Associations.  With landmark institutions such as the Hockey Hall of Fame, the Eaton's Centre, Yonge-Dundas Square, Ryerson University, the Yorkville shopping district and the iconic intersection of Yonge and Bloor, it serves as the Toronto's downtown core for arts, culture and shopping for residents and tourists alike.

 

The Five Year Capital Works Plan calls for major utility and road resurfacing work on Yonge Street to take place in 2016.  This provides an opportunity to explore commercial improvements that might be made in conjunction with the scheduled construction work to increase the commercial vibrancy of the street and retail experience.

 

With many different stakeholders in the area, coordinating utility and public realm improvement work will reduce costs and serve to ensure a more streamlined and efficient construction process.

 

Enhancing the competitiveness and social experience of the downtown core is an essential component of maintaining and improving the economic health of the City.  Investments in the public realm drive economic growth and will ensure Yonge Street remains Toronto's premier shopping, dining and cultural destination for the entire region.

 

(Submitted to City Council on May 7 and 8, 2013 as MM33.13)

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 13, 2013) Referral of Member Motion by City Council - Planning and Revitalizing Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58633.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Dylan Reid (TE.Supp.TE25.66.1)

TE25.67 - Road Alteration and Traffic Regulations - East Liberty Street and Lynn Williams Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bills 1158 and 1159 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the narrowing of Lynn Williams Street, north of East Liberty Street, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421G-1109, dated June 2013, attached to the June 6, 2013 report, entitled "Road Alteration and Traffic Regulations - East Liberty Street and Lynn Williams Street", from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council approve the installation of "Stop" control for eastbound and westbound traffic on East Liberty Street at Lynn Williams Street.

 

3.         City Council enact a "No Parking, Anytime" regulation on the south side of East Liberty Street, between a point 72.2 metres west of Lynn Williams Street and a point 15 metres east of Lynn Williams Street.

Origin

(June 6, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to undertake a road alteration and introduce traffic regulations at the intersection of East Liberty Street and Lynn Williams Street.  The proposed changes will include a narrowing on the northeast corner and the installation of all-way "Stop" sign control.  Additionally, an eastbound left-turn lane and pedestrian crosswalks will be marked with pavement markings.

 

The proposed changes will improve the pedestrian environment and will result in the loss of about 20 on-street parking spaces.   These changes are part of the site plan agreement and the developer will be responsible for all costs.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Road Alteration and Traffic Regulations - East Liberty Street and Lynn Williams Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59453.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1109 - Road Alteration and Traffic Regulations - East Liberty Street and Lynn Williams Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59454.pdf
(May 30, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Road Alteration and Traffic Regulations - East Liberty Street and Lynn Williams Street - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58884.pdf

TE25.69 - Construction Staging Area - No. 100 Adelaide Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bills 1096 and 1097 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the closure of the north sidewalk on Adelaide Street West, between Sheppard Street and a point 49 metres west, from July 17, 2013 to April 30, 2017.

 

2.         City Council approve the closure of the north curb lane on Adelaide Street West, between Sheppard Street and a point 84 metres west, from July 17, 2013 to April 30, 2017.

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services to request the alteration and/or removal of the proposed staging area if required to accommodate the Pan Am festivities during the months of July and August 2015.

 

4.         City Council approve the implementation of a "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on the north side of Adelaide Street West, between a point 30.5 metres west of Sheppard Street and a point 53.5 metres further west, from July 17, 2013 to April 30, 2017.

 

5.         City Council adjust the "Prohibited Pedestrians Crossings" regulation on Adelaide Street West, between the west curb line of Sheppard Street and a point 30.5 metres east of the east curb line of Sheppard Street, to be in effect between the east curb line of Sheppard Street and a point 30.5 metres west of the west curb line of Sheppard Street, from July 17, 2013 to April 30, 2017.

 

6.         City Council adjust the existing "No Stopping, 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except Public Holidays" regulation on the north side of Adelaide Street West, between Duncan Street and a point 30.5 metres west of Sheppard Street, to be in effect from Duncan Street to a point 84 metres west of Sheppard Street, from July 17, 2013 to April 30, 2017.

 

7.         City Council adjust the existing "No Standing, 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except Public Holidays" regulation on the north side of Adelaide Street West, between University Avenue and a point 30.5 metres west of Sheppard Avenue, to be in effect from University Avenue to a point 84 metres west of Sheppard Avenue, from July 17, 2013 to April 30, 2017.

 

8.         City Council adjust the existing "No Parking Anytime" regulation on the north side of Adelaide Street West, between Simcoe Street and Yonge Street, to be in effect from Simcoe Street to a point 84 metres west of Sheppard Street, and from Sheppard Street to Yonge Street, from July 17, 2013 to April 30, 2017.

 

9.         City Council direct that Adelaide Street West be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority to close the north sidewalk on Adelaide Street West, between Sheppard Street and a point 49 metres west, and the north curb lane, between Sheppard Street and a point 84 metres west.  A covered pedestrian walkway would be built in the closed lane.  We are also requesting authority to temporarily relocate the crosswalk on the west leg of the intersection of Adelaide Street East and Sheppard Street to the east leg for pedestrian safety.

 

Adelaide Street West will be reduced to three lanes in the vicinity of the staging area.  There will be no loss of parking on Adelaide Street West because it is already prohibited in the vicinity of the proposed staging area.

 

Khurana Associates is constructing a 42-storey office tower at No. 100 Adelaide Street West.  This project requires temporary sidewalk and lane closures for a period of 46 months, to enable construction to proceed. 

 

This work also requires the closure of the west sidewalk and curb lane on Sheppard Street.  These matters are dealt with in a companion report entitled "Construction Staging Area - Sheppard Street" requiring Toronto and East York Community Council approval.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - No. 100 Adelaide Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58906.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1093 - Construction Staging Area - No. 100 Adelaide Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58907.pdf

Speakers

Jassie Khurana, Khurana Associates

Communications (Community Council)

(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Sean Boulton (TE.Supp.TE25.69.1)
(June 16, 2013) E-mail from Max Allen, Vice President for Planning and Development, and Nick Schefter, Vice President for Community Standards, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp.TE25.69.2)

TE25.71 - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the continuation of the closure of the east curb lane and sidewalk on Yonge Street, between The Esplanade and Front Street, from July 17, 2013 to November 30, 2013.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Ferncastle Front Street Inc. is constructing a 57-storey residential building at No. 8 The Esplanade, on the east side of Yonge Street, between The Esplanade and Front Street East.   They need to maintain the closure of the east curb lane and sidewalk on Yonge Street in order to complete their work.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58765.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-9899 - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58806.pdf

TE25.72 - Accessible Loading Zone - No. 171 East Liberty Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1047 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate an Accessible Loading Zone to be in effect at all times on the south side of East Liberty Street, between a point 50.2 metres east of Hanna Avenue and a point 15 metres further east.

Origin

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to designate an accessible loading zone on the south side of East Liberty Street, fronting the Village Family Health Team (Unit 102 - 171 East Liberty Street).  The accessible loading zone will operate at all times and will allow vehicles at this location to pick-up and drop-off persons with disabilities.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Accessible Loading Zone - No. 171 East Liberty Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58803.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1102 - Accessible Loading Zone - No. 171 East Liberty Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58804.pdf

TE25.73 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic/Parking Regulations for 2013 Canadian National Exhibition - Non-Delegated

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Bills 1048, 1049 and 1050 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the temporary traffic and parking regulations on streets in the vicinity of Exhibition Place which are impacted during the Canadian National Exhibition, identified in Appendix “A” attached to the report dated May 30, 2013, from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's authority to enact temporary traffic and parking amendments required to enhance traffic operations and pedestrian safety during the annual Canadian National Exhibition (CNE), which takes place from August 16 to September 2, 2013,  inclusive.  As this staff report concerns roadways with regular TTC Service, City Council approval is required. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic/Parking Regulations for 2013 Canadian National Exhibition
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58874.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0730 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic/Parking Regulations for 2013 Canadian National Exhibition
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58875.pdf

TE25.79 - Parking Amendments - Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bills 1093, 1094 and 1095 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition on the west side of Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue West.

 

2.         City Council rescind the existing parking prohibition on the east side of Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue East.

 

3.         City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition on the west side of Yonge Street, between Birch Avenue and Woodlawn Avenue West, in effect 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except Public Holidays.

 

4.         City Council rescind the existing stopping prohibition on the east side of Yonge Street, between Shaftsbury Avenue and Woodlawn Avenue East, in effect 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except Public Holidays.

 

5.         City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the west side of Yonge Street, between Birch Avenue and Woodlawn Avenue West, from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except Public Holidays.

 

6.         City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the east side of Yonge Street, between Shaftsbury Avenue and Woodlawn Avenue East, from 3:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, except Public Holidays.

 

7.         City Council rescind the existing standing prohibition on the west side of Yonge Street, between Woodlawn Avenue West and a point 35.4 metres south of Birch Avenue, in effect 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., Monday to Friday.

 

8.         City Council rescind the existing standing prohibition on the east side of Yonge Street, between Woodlawn Avenue East and a point 35.4 metres south of Birch Avenue, in effect 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., Monday to Friday.

 

9.         City Council prohibit parking on the west side of Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue West, from 9:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday.

 

10.       City Council prohibit parking on the east side of Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue East, from 7:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday.

 

11.       City Council allow Pay-and-Display parking on the west side of Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue West, from 7:00 p.m. to Midnight, Monday to Friday, for a maximum period of 5.5 hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour, and from 8:00 a.m. to Midnight on Saturdays, and 1:00 p.m. to Midnight on Sundays, for a maximum period of six hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour.

 

12.       City Council allow Pay-and-Display parking on the east side of Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue East, from 7:00 p.m. to Midnight, Monday to Friday, for a maximum period of 5.5 hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour, and from 8:00 a.m. to Midnight on Saturdays, and 1:00 p.m. to Midnight on Sundays, for a maximum period of six hours at a rate of $2.50 per hour.

Origin

(April 24, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to amend the parking regulation on both sides of Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue, to allow parking during the evening off-peak periods and on Saturdays and Sundays. 

 

The implementation of on-street Pay-and-Display parking along this section of Yonge Street during the evening week-day and week-end timeframes proposed, should not adversely impact operational safety while providing much needed on-street parking for area businesses within this community and provide approximately 83 additional on-street overnight parking spaces.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 24, 2013) Revised Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Parking Amendments - Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58576.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1064 - Parking Amendments - Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58577.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1079 - Parking Amendments - Yonge Street, between Crescent Road and Woodlawn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58578.pdf

TE25.83 - Removal of Accessible Parking Space - June 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bill 1051 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the removal of an on-street accessible parking space at the location identified in Appendix A attached to the report dated May 29 , 2013, from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(May 29, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the removal of an on-street accessible parking space for persons with disabilities.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject street, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2013) Revised Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Removal of Accessible Parking Space - June 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58807.pdf

TE25.88 - Traffic Regulations - Dundas Street West and Roncesvalles Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Bills 1034, 1035 and 1036 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the "No Stopping, Anytime" regulation on west side of Roncesvalles Avenue, between a point 63 meters south of Boustead Avenue and a point 112 metres north, to operate between Boustead Avenue and a point 63 metres south.

 

2.         City Council enact a "No Stopping, Anytime" regulation on the west side of Dundas Street West, between Boustead Avenue and a point 73.4 metres north.

 

3.         City Council designate the easterly southbound lane on Dundas Street West, between a point 51.4 metres north of Boustead Avenue and a point 22 metres further north, anytime, for southbound left-turning traffic (streetcars excepted).

 

4.         City Council designate the westerly southbound lane on Dundas Street West, between a point 51.4 metres north of Boustead Avenue and a point 22 metres further north, anytime, for southbound straight-through traffic.

Origin

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to amend the traffic regulations at the intersection of Dundas Street West and Roncesvalles Avenue.  The proposed improvements at this intersection will provide better guidance to southbound motorists and will enhance safety for all users.  These changes will result in the loss of about two on-street parking spaces.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 15, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Regulations - Dundas Street West and Roncesvalles Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58762.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1087 - Traffic Regulations - Dundas Street West and Roncesvalles Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58781.pdf

TE25.90 - Streetcar Loading Platforms and Traffic Control Signals - Bathurst Street and Niagara Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1134 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of streetcar loading platforms on Bathurst Street, north and south of Niagara Street, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421G-1043, dated April 2013, attached to the May 17, 2013 report, entitled "Streetcar Loading Platforms and Traffic Control Signals - Bathurst Street and Niagara Street", from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council approve the relocation of the mid-block pedestrian traffic signal on Bathurst Street, 35 metres north of Niagara Street, to the intersection of Bathurst Street and Niagara Street, coincident with the installation of streetcar loading platforms.

 

3.         City Council approve the designation of a safety zone on the west side of Bathurst Street, immediately north of Niagara Street, and on the east side of Bathurst Street, immediately south of Niagara Street, coincident with the installation of streetcar loading platforms.

Origin

(May 17, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to install streetcar loading platforms on Bathurst Street at Niagara Street.  The existing transit stops at Wellington Street West and at Front Street West will be relocated to this intersection.  Additionally, the existing mid-block traffic control signals on Bathurst Street, 35 metres north of Niagara Street, will be relocated to the intersection of Bathurst Street and Niagara Street.  These changes are required to accommodate the TTC's new fully accessible low-floor streetcars.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 17, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Streetcar Loading Platforms and Traffic Control Signals - Bathurst Street and Niagara Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58881.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1043 - Streetcar Loading Platforms and Traffic Control Signals - Bathurst Street and Niagara Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58882.pdf

TE25.91 - Streetcar Loading Platform - Bathurst Street and Queen Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1135 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of a modified streetcar loading platform on Bathurst Street, south of Queen Street West, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421G-0992, dated March 2013, attached to the May 17, 2013 report, entitled "Streetcar Loading Platform - Bathurst Street and Queen Street West", from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council rescind the easterly northbound lane designation for northbound right-turning traffic, at all times, on Bathurst Street, between Queen Street West and a point 30.5 metres further south, coincident with the installation of the streetcar loading platform.

Origin

(May 17, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval from City Council to widen and extend the existing streetcar loading platform on Bathurst Street, south of Queen Street West.  This proposal is required to accommodate TTC's new low-floor streetcars and will result in changes to the existing traffic regulations in the vicinity of this intersection.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 17, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Streetcar Loading Platform - Bathurst Street and Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58744.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0992 - Streetcar Loading Platform - Bathurst Street and Queen Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-58745.pdf

TE25.106 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Attention
Communications TE25.106.22 to TE25.106.31 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests for:

 

1.         Temporary patio extension along Beatrice Avenue for the 667 College Street Annual Customer Appreciation Events to be held on August 17, 2013, from 12:01 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., provided that there is no amplified sound on the patio, with temporary street closures along Beatrice Avenue from 12:01 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.

 

2.         Temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the following host restaurants during the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) to be held from September 5 to 15, 2013:

 

            Brant House, 522 King Street West

            Spice Route, 499 King Street West

            Drake Hotel, 1150 Queen Street West

            Spoke Club, 600 King Street West

            Malaparte, 350 King Street West

 

3.         Temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. for the Entertainment One Films (previously Alliance Films) event, coinciding with TIFF, to be held on Sunday, September 9, 2013, at Leon's Roundhouse, 255 Bremner Boulevard.

 

4.         Temporary liquor licence extensions for the following additional establishments during Toronto Beer Week Festival to be held from September 13 to 21, 2013, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m.:

 

a.         Court Jester, 609 Danforth Avenue
b.         The Dog & Bear, 1100 Queen Street West
c.
         Habits Gastropub Inc., 928 College Street

d.         The Loose Moose, 146 Front Street West
e.         Mill Street Brewpub, 55 Mill Street
f.
          Sauce, 1376 Danforth Avenue
g.
         Tall Boys Craft Beer House, 838 Bloor Street West, indoor only.

5.         Temporary closure of the alley at Honest Ed's, 581 Bloor Street West, from 12:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. for the CraveTO event on August 17, 2013. 

 

6.         Temporary patio extension for The Eaton Chelsea, at its Elm Street entrance, during the 5th Annual Ice, Wine and Dine Event to be held on November 22, 2013, from 3:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, on Elm Street, between Yonge Street and Bay Street; and for any necessary road closures as part of the event.

 

B.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the request from the Toronto International Film Festival for a 4:00 a.m. temporary liquor licence extension from September 5 to 15, 2013 for the Bloke & 4th at 401 King Street West, was not approved.

 

C.        City Council concur in the action taken by the Toronto and East York Community Council in approving the following, due to the timing of such events:

 

1.         Temporary patio extension along Beatrice Avenue for the 667 College Street Annual Customer Appreciation Events to be held on July 6, 2013, from 12:01 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.,  provided that there is no amplified sound on the patio, with temporary street closures along Beatrice Avenue from 12:01 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.

 

2.         Temporary liquor licence extension from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. for the Midnight MRKT event to be held on Friday, July 19, 2013 in the courtyard adjacent to and on the west side of 461 King Street West.

 

3.         Temporary patio extension for the Royal Canadian Legion Branch 345, 81 Peard Road, on July 1, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for its Canada Day celebration.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council, for liquor licensing purposes:

 

A.        Declared the following to be events of municipal significance:

 

1.         Toronto Blue Jays Cottage in the City Festival and the Summer Friday Fan Festivals to be held on the following dates on Rogers Centre property as well as Canada Lands, on the south west side of the Rogers Centre, outside of Gates 10 and 11:

 

Friday, June 21, 2013 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Saturday, June 22, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Sunday, June 23, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.

Friday, July 5, 2103 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Friday, July 19, 2013 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Friday, July 26, 2013 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Friday, August 9, 2013 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

Friday, August 30, 2013 from 4:30 p.m. to 7:00 p.m.

 

2.          AwesTRUCK 2013 to be held on July 20, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Garrison Commons, 250 Fort York Boulevard.

 

3.         Grolsch Open House, a four-day celebratory public consumer and film industry event to take place during the opening weekend of the Toronto International Film Festival, on September 6-9, 2013, from 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., in the parking lot on the south-east corner of John Street and Adelaide Street West (99 John Street/283 Adelaide Street West).

 

4.         FOUNDRY x MOCCA, additional dates of August 10 and August 17, 2013, to be held in the courtyard of the Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art, 952 Queen Street West, from 1:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

 

5.         667 College Street Annual Customer Appreciation Events to be held on July 6, 2013 and August 17, 2013,  from 12:01 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., provided there is no amplified sound on the patio.

 

6.         Lab Cab Festival: Parkdale to be held on July 27 and 28, 2013, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., each day at various stores and businesses on Queen Street West, between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street.

 

7.         Cask-Conditioned Craft Beer Festival to be held on Saturday, October 19 and Sunday, October 20, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., each day at the Don Valley Evergreen Brick Works at 550 Bayview Avenue.

 

8.         Toronto International Film Festival to be held from September 5 to 15, 2013, at various locations.

 

9.         Corks and Forks on the Danny event, hosted by Toronto Honda and Toronto Kia, to be held on September 26, 2013, from 4:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. at 2300 Danforth Avenue and 2222 Danforth Avenue.

 

10.       Entertainment One Films (previously Alliance Films) event, coinciding with TIFF, to be held on Sunday, September 9, 2013, at Leon's Roundhouse, 255 Bremner Boulevard, from 8:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m.

 

11.       CraveTO to be held on August 17, 2013, in the Honest Ed's parking lot and alley, 581 Bloor Street West, from 12:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m.; and requesting approval for closure of the alley.

 

12.       Amendment to the times of the Bavarian Oktoberfest Celebration to be held on September 27 and 28, 2013, at the Kool Haus, The Guvernment Entertainment Complex, 132 Queens Quay East, from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., rather than 1:00 a.m. as originally approved in TE24.73 on May 14, 2013.

 

13.       Local Motion Festival, to be held at Artscape Gibraltor Point on Toronto Island from 1:00 p.m. on July 6, 2013 to 2:00 a.m. on July 7, 2013.

 

14.       The following events by the 519 Church Street Community Centre to be held as part of the Lesbian and Gay Pride Celebrations at Cawthra Square Park:

 

            June 23, 2013 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. - Back to our Roots - Stonewall Anniversary Celebration

 

            June 27, 2013, from 7:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight - Greenspace - Starry Night - Donors, members and celebrity guests.

 

            June 28, 2013 from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, on June 29 and 30, 2013 from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight – Green Space - 519 Pride Celebrations - part of the Pride Week Community Festival.

 

15.       Women Only event to be held on September 5, 2013, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at 90 Adelaide Street West, Suite No. 500.

 

16.       25th Ontario Oyster Festival to be held on July 21, 2013, from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at 469 King Street West on the east side between the buildings of 461 and 469 King Street West.

 

17.       Midnight MRKT event to be held on Friday, July 19, 2013 from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. in the courtyard adjacent to and on the west side of 461 King Street West.

 

18.       MATSURI - 1st Toronto Japanese Summer Festival to be held on Sunday, July 28, 2013 from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. at Yonge-Dundas Square.

 

19.       5th Annual Ice, Wine and Dine Event to be held on November 22, 2013, from 3:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, on Elm Street, between Yonge Street and Bay Street.

  

B.        Approved the following and requested that City Council concur in the action taken by the Toronto and East York Community Council in approving the following, due to the timing of such events:

 

1.         Temporary patio extension along Beatrice Avenue for the 667 College Street Annual Customer Appreciation Event to be held on July 6, 2013, from 12:01 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.,  provided that there is no amplified sound on the patio, with temporary street closures along Beatrice Avenue from 12:01 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.

 

2.         Temporary liquor licence extension from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. for the Midnight MRKT event to be held on Friday, July 19, 2013 in the courtyard adjacent to and on the west side of 461 King Street West.

 

3.         Temporary patio extension for the Royal Canadian Legion Branch 345, 81 Peard Road, on July 1, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. for its Canada Day celebration.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events for Liquor Licensing Purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(May 22, 2013) Letter from Kristy-Leigh Boone, Manager, Special Events, Toronto Blue Jays, requesting that the Toronto Blue Jays Cottage in the City Festival and the Summer Friday Fan Festivals to be held on various dates on Rogers Centre property as well as Canada Lands, on the south west side of the Rogers Centre outside of Gates 10 and 11, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE25.106.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37666.pdf
(May 22, 2013) E-mail from Frank Kocis, Event Producer, requesting that AwesTRUCK 2013, to be held on July 20, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m., at Garrison Commons, 250 Fort York Boulevard, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE25.106.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37667.pdf
(May 23, 2013) Letter from Scott Rondeau, The Power Juncture Corporation, requesting that Grolsch Open House, a four-day celebratory public consumer and film industry event to take place during the opening weekend of the Toronto International Film Festival, on September 6-9, 2013, from 4:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., at the parking lot on the South East corner of John Street and Adelaide Street West, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE25.106.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37668.pdf
(April 25, 2013) Letter from Matt Eckensweiler, Co-Founder, Foundry, requesting that the additional dates of August 10 and August 17, 2013, for the FOUNDRY x MOCCA, to be held in the courtyard of the Museum of Contemporary Canadian Art, 952 Queen Street West, from 1:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE25.106.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37707.pdf
(May 3, 2013) Letter from Domenic Taddeo, 667 College Street, requesting that the Annual Customer Appreciation Events to be held on July 6, 2013, and August 17, 2013, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of patio extensions along Beatrice Avenue and temporary street closures from 12:01 p.m. to 11:59 p.m. during these events. (TE.Main.TE25.106.5)
(May 28, 2013) Letter from Andre du Toit, Artistic Producer, Lab Cab Festival: Parkdale, requesting that Lab Cab Festival: Parkdale to be held on July 27 and 28, 2013, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day at various stores and businesses on Queen Street West, between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE25.106.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37785.pdf
(May 29, 2013) Letter from Tomas Morana, President of 9 Gallon Enterprises Inc., requesting that the Cask-Conditioned Craft Beer Festival to be held on Saturday, October 19 and Sunday, October 20, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., each day at the Don Valley Evergreen Brick Works at 550 Bayview Avenue, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE25.106.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37764.pdf
(May 31, 2013) Letter from Maxine Bailey, Vice President, Advancement, requesting that the Toronto International Film Festival to be held from September 5 to 15, 2013, at various locations, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the host restaurants: Brant House, Spice Route, Drake Hotel, Spoke Club, Block & 4, and Malaparte. (TE.Main.TE25.106.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37801.pdf
(June 3, 2013) Letter from Justin Van Dette, Manager, Corporate and Community Relations, Toronto East General Hospital Foundation, requesting that the Corks and Forks on the Danny event, hosted by Toronto Honda and Toronto Kia, to be held on September 26, 2013, from 4:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. at 2300 Danforth Avenue and 2222 Danforth Avenue, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE25.106.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37809.pdf
(June 4, 2013) Letter from Kathleen Nakonechny, requesting that an Entertainment One Films (previously Alliance Films) event, coinciding with TIFF, to be held on Sunday, September 9, 2013, at Leon's Roundhouse, 255 Bremner Boulevard, from 8:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m., be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. for this event. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.10)
(June 7, 2013) Letter from Stev Baycetich, Crave TO, requesting that CraveTO to be held on August 17, 2013, in the Honest Ed's parking lot and alley, 581 Bloor Street West, from 12:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of the closure of the alley for this event. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37879.pdf
(June 6, 2013) Letter from Justina Klein, Producer, Toronto Oktoberfest, requesting an amendment to the times of the Bavarian Oktoberfest Celebration to be held on September 27 and 28, 2013, at the Kool Haus, The Guvernment Entertainment Complex from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., rather than 1:00 a.m. as originally approved in TE24.73 on May 14, 2013. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37880.pdf
(June 5, 2013) Fax from John Stevenson, ElectriCITY Events Inc., requesting that the Local Motion Festival, to be held at Artscape Gibraltor Point on Toronto Island from 1:00 p.m. on July 6, 2013 to 2:00 a.m. on July 7, 2013, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.13)
(May 15, 2013) Letter from Helen Rykens, The 519 Church Street Community Centre requesting that various events to be held as part of the Lesbian and Gay Pride Celebrations on June 23, 2013 from 3:00 to 11:00 p.m., on June 27, 2013, from 7:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, and on June 28 from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, and June 29 and 30, 2013, from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight, at Cawthra Square Park, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-37939.pdf
(June 11, 2013) Letter from Karen Peterke, requesting that a women only event to be held on September 5, 2013, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., at 90 Adelaide Street West, Suite No. 500, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.15)
(June 11, 2013) Fax from Ann-Marie Celestine, Rodney's Oyster House, requesting that the 25th Ontario Oyster Festival, to be held on July 21, 2013, from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at 469 King Street West on the east side between the buildings of 461 and 469 King Street West, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-38152.pdf
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from George Milbrandt, Toronto Beer Week, requesting that the Toronto Beer Week Festival to be held from September 13 to 21, 2013, at various locations, as listed in the email (June 14, 2013) be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting liquor licence extensions from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. during this event. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.17)
(June 17, 2013) Letter from Ryan Fisher, Owner, 2nd Floor, requesting that Midnight MRKT Event, to be held on July 19, 2013, from 6:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., in the courtyard on the West side of 461 King Street West, be declared an event of municipal significance; and a request for a temporary liquor licence extension. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.18)
(June 14, 2013) E-mail from Luke Hobbs, requesting that MATSURI - 1st Toronto Japanese Summer Festival, to be held on July 28, 2013, from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., at the Yonge Dundas Square, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.19)
(April 24, 2013) Letter from Linda Marsh, 1st Vice-President, requesting that the Royal Canadian Legion, Branch 345, Canada Day celebration on July 1, 2013, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., in the front parking lot, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting temporary patio extension. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-38421.pdf
(June 18, 2013) Letter from Mark Garner, Executive Director and Chief Staff Officer, requesting that the 5th Annual Ice, Wine and Dine event to be held on November 22, 2013, from 3:00 p.m. to midnight, on Elm Street between Yonge Street and Bay Street, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE25.106.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-38439.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 27, 2013) Letter from Lauren Gould, Audience Development Manager, Gardiner Museum requesting a letter of non-objection for an opening event to the Artist Intervention Series on September 6, 2013. (CC.Main.TE25.106.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-38912.pdf
(June 24, 2013) Letter from Geoffrey Wilson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Port Authority with respect to the Sail-In Cinema event on August 15, 16 and 17, 2013 (CC.Main.TE25.106.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-38913.pdf
(July 3, 2013) Letter from Steve Froemmel, Director of Food and Beverage, Renaissance Toronto Downtown Hotel requesting a letter of non objection for the purpose of receiving a liquor licence extension for Beer Gardens on August 13 to 15, and August 26 to 28, 2013 from 12:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. each day at the Rogers Centre in its outdoor Parkette located at 1 Blue Jays Way (CC.Main.TE25.106.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-38915.pdf
(July 11, 2013) Letter from Michael Simpson, Legal Professional Corporation requesting a temporary extention of a liquor licence for Zipperz Bar, 72 Carlton Street on August 4, 2013 (CC.Supp.TE25.106.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39101.pdf
(July 10, 2013) Letter from Lauren Gould, Audience Development Manager, Gardiner Museum withdrawing a previous request for an event at the Museum which is not required as the Gardiner Museum is a charitable organization (CC.Supp.TE25.106.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39102.pdf
(July 12, 2013) Letter from Robert Salvati, Owner, Vivoli Restaurant, regarding a liquor licence extension for Vivoli Restaurant's Customer Appreciation Day on August 10, 2013 (CC.New.TE25.106.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39111.pdf
(May 24, 2013) E-mail from Sharon Skup, Secretary/Treasurer, Canadian-Cuban Friendship Association Toronto, regarding a temporary liquor licence for a beer garden at the 18th Annual Toronto-Cuba Friendship Day, Salsa in the Square on August 24, 2013. (CC.New.TE25.106.28)
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Katerina Gourmos, GreekTown on the Danforth BIA regarding the closure of Danforth Avenue from Broadview Avenue to Jones Avenue for the duration of the 20th Annual Pilaros Taste of the Danforth from August 9 to August 11, 2013 (CC.New.TE25.106.29)
(July 15, 2013) Letter from Curtis Eustace, Manager, Parade Operations regarding a temporary liquor licence for the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto Grande Parade at the Exhibition Place Bandshell Park on Saturday, August 3, 2013, submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21 (CC.New.TE25.106.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39156.pdf
(July 15, 2013) Letter from Curtis Eustace, Manager, Parade Operations regarding a temporary liquor licence for the Festival Management Committee, organizers of the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto, for the Last Lap Chinatown event on Sunday, August 11, 2013, submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21 (CC.New.TE25.106.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39157.pdf

TE25.110 - Reduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking Hours - Christie Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1021 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the existing parking by permit only from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., at all times, on the odd side of Christie Street, from St. Clair Avenue West to Ellsworth Avenue.

 

2.         City Council rescind the existing parking by permit only from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., at all times, on the odd side of Christie Street, from Tyrrel Avenue to Ellsworth Avenue.

 

3.         City Council rescind the existing parking by permit only from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., at all times, on the even side of Christie Street, from St. Clair Avenue West to Ellsworth Avenue.

 

4.         City Council rescind the existing parking by permit only from 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., at all times, on the even side of Christie Street, from Tyrrel Avenue to Ellsworth Avenue.

 

5.         City Council authorize parking by permit from 12:01 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., at all times, on the odd side of Christie Street, from St. Clair Avenue West to Tyrrel Avenue.

 

6.         City Council authorize parking by permit from 12:01 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., at all times, on the even side of Christie Street, from St. Clair Avenue West to Tyrrel Avenue.

Origin

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to reduce the Permit Parking hours of operation on Christie Street.

 

Councillor Joe Mihevc requested a reduction to the overnight on-street permit parking hours of operation on Christie Street, between Tyrrel Avenue and St. Clair Avenue West from the current 12:01 a.m. to 7:00 a.m., 7 days a week, to 12:01 a.m. to 6:00 a.m., 7 days a week. 

 

The reduction of the overnight on-street permit parking hours would allow non permit holders, such as visitors and vendors of the Wychwood Farmers Market, to park during non-permit parking hours, without being subject to tagging by Parking Enforcement Officers.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 31, 2013) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Reduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking Hours - Christie Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59521.pdf
Appendix A - Reduction of Overnight On-Street Permit Parking Hours - Christie Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59522.pdf

TE25.118 - Community Sign Installation - Kingston Road Village

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services to approve the design, the location and permit the installation of a community sign within the public road allowance to identify the Kingston Road Village community.

Origin

(June 4, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, Ward 32, Beaches-East York

Summary

The residents and businesses in the Kingston Road Village community are proud to live and work in this area and have requested that I put forward this motion seeking permission for appropriate signage to be installed on Kingston Road at Scarborough Road, or within the limits of this community, that will recognize their community and identify it to visitors.  This new sign complements other existing signs along Kingston Road which provide gateway signage to the various communities and business areas stretching across the east end of Toronto.

 

A preliminary estimate for the sign to be designed, manufactured and installed is $8,000.00.  Funding has been provided by the Urban Design Section, City Planning Division from the Civic Improvements capital budget, to be included as part of the overall TTC track replacement and road resurfacing  project this year.

 

By virtue of my submission of this motion, I advise that I support this request from my constituents and commit to working with them and Transportation Services staff to ensure the design of the signs meet the attached Criteria for the Installation of Neighbourhood and Community Signs within City of Toronto Road Allowances (Appendix A).  This motion would amend the current requirements for neighbourhood and community signage policies in advance of complete reporting out by Transportation Services on this and the street naming sign policies.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 4, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon - Community Sign Installation - Kingston Road Village
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59428.pdf

TE25.119 - Road Alteration - Queen Street West and Bay Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bills 1038, 1091 and 1092 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the road and sidewalk alteration of Queen Street West and of Bay Street, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421G-1099 dated May 2013, attached to the June 3, 2013, report entitled "Road Alteration - Queen Street West and Bay Street", from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council rescind the existing no stopping regulation in effect at all times on the north side of Queen Street West from Bay Street and a point 39.6 metres west.

 

3.         City Council rescind the no stopping regulation on the north side of Queen Street West in effect from 7:30 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. and from 3:30 p.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday to Friday, except public holidays from Bay Street and a point 153.6 metres further west.

 

4.         City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Queen Street West from Bay Street to a point 46.9 metres further west.

 

5.         City Council prohibit stopping at all times on the north side of Queen Street West from a point 138.1 metres west of Bay Street to a point 30.6 metres further west.

 

6.         City Council amend the existing bus parking zone on the north side of Queen Street West, from 121.1 metres west of Bay Street to a point 33 metres further west, to be in effect from 125.6 metres west of Bay Street to a point 17 metres further west.

 

7.         City Council amend the existing bus parking zone on the north side of Queen Street West, from 67.1 metres west of Bay Street to a point 41.5 metres further west, to be in effect from 71.6 metres west of Bay Street to a point 17 metres further west.

Origin

(June 14, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Certain sections of Queen Street West and Bay Street will be reconstructed this year as part of Phase 3 of the Nathan Phillips Square Revitalization Project.  Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to alter the intersection of Queen Street West and Bay Street, and the road and sidewalk modifications on the north side of Queen Street West, between Bay Street and the City Hall parking garage entrance and exit.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 14, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Road Alteration - Queen Street West and Bay Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59603.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1099 - Queen Street West and Bay Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59604.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1121 - Queen Street West and Bay Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59605.pdf

TE25.121 - Liquor Licence Application - 1553 Dupont Street - Aromas - Licence No. 800331

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Aromas, 1553 Dupont Street (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents because of their concerns about public safety, noise, litter and other disturbances, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address the concerns of the community.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailăo, Ward 18, Davenport

Summary

2367542 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 1553 Dupont Street operating under the name Aromas (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for an indoor capacity of 37 patrons, broken down as follows: 27 on the ground floor and 10 in the basement, and an outdoor capacity of 2 patrons.

 

The Premises is located in close proximity to residential properties and may impact these neighbouring residents. The residents' concerns relate to noise, litter, safety and other potential disturbances. There are other licensed establishments on this section of Dupont Street which are causing disturbances and the residents are concerned about the impacts from an additional licensed establishment.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.  Issues that must be addressed include, but are not limited to, safety of the public, noise, litter, lighting and potential disturbances to residents in the area. This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailăo - Liquor Licence Application - 1553 Dupont Street - Aromas - Licence No. 800331
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59606.pdf

TE25.122 - Liquor Licence Application - 3 and 3A Westmoreland Avenue - El Cafecito Licence No. 816181

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for El Cafecito, 3 and 3A Westmoreland Avenue (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents because of their concerns about public safety, noise, litter and other disturbances, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address the concerns of the community.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailăo, Ward 18, Davenport

Summary

John Lostracco has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 3 and 3A Westmoreland Avenue operating under the name El Cafecito (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for an indoor capacity of 43 patrons, and an outdoor capacity of 44 persons which will be located on a front patio.

 

The Premises is located in close proximity to residential properties and may impact these neighbouring residents. The residents' concerns relate to noise, litter, safety and other potential disturbances.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.  Issues that must be addressed include, but are not limited to, safety of the public, noise, litter, lighting and potential disturbances to residents in the area. This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailăo - Liquor Licence Application - 3 and 3A Westmoreland Avenue - El Cafecito - Licence No. 816181
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59607.pdf

TE25.123 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of a Committee of Adjustment Decision - 126 Manor Road East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to support the decision of the Committee of Adjustment at the hearing date on July 30, 2013 to refuse the current proposal at 126 Manor Road East, and negotiate a settlement on any revised proposal that the applicant brings forward.

Origin

(June 17, 2013) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul's

Summary

On April 24, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment heard and refused an application for a severance and minor variances with respect to the property known as 126 Manor Road East.

 

I shared the concerns of many local residents and the planning department that this proposal did not meet with the existing character of the neighbourhood.  Shortly before the meeting the applicant had agreed to modify their proposal to address the concerns that had been raised in the community, and requested a deferral.  A deferral was not granted by the Committee of Adjustment, and the application was refused.

 

The applicant has since filed an appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board.   Since this decision, I have met with the planner department, residents and the applicant, and I believe that there is an opportunity to reach an agreement, that will need to be presented to the OMB.  A hearing date has been scheduled for July 30, 2013.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 17, 2013) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of a Committee of Adjustment Decision - 126 Manor Road East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59620.pdf
Attachment - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - 126 Manor Road East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59581.pdf

TE25.125 - Temporary Change to Pay-and-Display Parking on Kingston Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Bills 1057, 1058 and 1059 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the parking machine regulation on the south side of Kingston Road, between Willow Avenue and Silver Birch Avenue, currently in effect from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday to Saturday at a rate of $1.50 per hour and for a maximum period of 3 hours, from June 25 to December 31, 2013.

 

2.         City Council implement a one-hour parking regulation on the south side of Kingston Road, between Willow Avenue and Silver Birch Avenue, from June 25 to December 31, 2013.

 

3.         City Council direct that the parking machine operation on the south side of Kingston Road, between Willow Avenue and Silver Birch Avenue, be returned to its pre-construction regulation when the construction project on Kingston Road, between Queen Street East and Victoria Park Avenue is complete.

Origin

(June 17, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, Ward 32, Beaches-East York

Summary

Kingston Road is scheduled to undergo track reconstruction this year which will greatly disrupt local residents and businesses. Shortening the maximum parking time on Kingston Road will make deliveries easier for the business in the Kingston Road Village area during the construction period.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 12, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon - Temporary Change to Pay-and-Display Parking on Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59546.pdf

TE25.127 - Renaming of Dupont Parkette East to Jay Macpherson Green

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communication TE25.127.1 has been submitted on this item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.        City Council approve the renaming of Dupont Parkette East to "Jay Macpherson Green".

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27, Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Summary

Jean "Jay" Macpherson (June 13, 1931 - March 21, 2012) was a Canadian lyric poet and scholar.  Jay Macpherson taught at Victoria College for 40 years and was hired at a time when there were not many women professors.  She was also the recipient of a Governor General's Award for her book of poetry, The Boatman, which she received at the young age of 27 years old.  Margaret Atwood described Macpherson as a very significant figure in the history of Canadian poetry and intellectual life and as the author of “very accomplished, really quite extraordinary work.”  Jay Macpherson lived in the Yorkville neighbourhood for over 40 years and was an active member of the Avenue-Bay-Cottingham (ABC) Resident's Association. 

 

Dupont Parkette East is located on the east side of Avenue Road and is bordered by Macpherson Avenue and Avenue Road.   The park space is undergoing improvements this Fall and the ABC Resident's association has requested that the park be renamed in honour of Jay Macpherson.  The renaming of the parkette to Jay Macpherson Green is an appropriate honourific naming because there is public support; the name is fitting with the geographic area where the park is located; and commemorates an important Canadian figure that has made a significant contribution to the neighbourhood through her involvement in the local resident's association.

 

I am requesting that Council approve the renaming this parkette in Ms. Macpherson's honour, so that the name change can be incorporated into the park improvements being completed in the Fall of 2013.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam - Renaming of Dupont Parkette East to Jay Macpherson Green
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59636.pdf
Attachment - Renaming of Dupont Parkette to Jay Macpherson Green
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59637.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 16, 2013) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong -Tam (CC.New.TE25.127.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39164.pdf

TE25.128 - Kensington Market - Request for Planning Analysis on Restaurant and Bar Uses

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to undertake a planning analysis of restaurant and bar uses in Kensington Market, as defined by the boundaries of the Kensington Market BIA, and report to the November 19, 2013 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council on the feasibility of amending the zoning by-law with respect to implementing restrictions on restaurant and bar uses in Kensington Market.

Origin

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

The report from City Planning on the Queen Street West Restaurant Study (between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street) (TE25.3) puts forward some recommendations about planning tools to try to manage change and maintain balance in urban land uses.

 

While it is a very different context, Kensington Market is experiencing similar challenges as more licensed restaurants and bars are opening in this community. With the ability to sell alcohol, these businesses are often able to pay much higher rents than raw food retailers that have been the core of Kensington Market for generations. Rents are being driven up at very high rates and it is triggering changes that must be understood before the Market as we know it is lost.

 

Significant change happening to our retail areas in the downtown and I believe that a balance must be struck to ensure that walkable, neighbourhood-based retail and food uses are maintained.

 

This motion requests City Planning to undertake a similar analysis of Kensington Market to understand issues of concentration and impacts on both the commercial and residential communities in the neighbourhood.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Kensington Market - Request for Planning Analysis on Restaurant and Bar Uses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-59655.pdf

New Business - Meeting 37

CC37.1 - Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Application to the National Energy Board for Line 9B Reversal - City of Toronto Participation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 4, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

This report is to advise Council on the status of an application by Enbridge Pipelines Inc. to the National Energy Board.  The application is to change the operating conditions of pipeline 9B which runs from Hamilton to Montreal and crosses the City of Toronto.  This report is also to advise Council of the steps taken on behalf of the City as an intervenor in the National Energy Board proceedings.

Background Information

(July 4, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Application to the National Energy Board for Line 9B Reversal - City of Toronto Participation (CC37.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60101.pdf

CC37.2 - Petition to Redivide Ward Boundaries

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications CC37.2.1 to CC37.2.4 have been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(July 3, 2013) Report from the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk and City Solicitor recommend that Council

 

Either:

 

1A.      Adopt the requests set out in the petition and pass a by-law substantially in the form of the draft bill attached as Appendix 2.

 

OR

 

1B.       Not adopt the requests set out in the petition.

 

2.         Regardless of the option selected, if Council's decision is legally challenged by the petitioning electors or any other person, Council authorize the City Solicitor to defend any such legal challenge.

 

3.         If Council does not adopt the requests set out in the petition, and does face a legal challenge by the petitioning electors, Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board or court, as the case may be, adjourn the proceeding until completion of the ward boundary review, which Council approved at its June 11, 12, and 13, 2013 meeting.

 

Summary

This report responds to a petition requesting ward boundary changes. The petition in Appendix 1 was received by the City Clerk on June 27, 2013 pursuant to section 129 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 ("COTA") and states:

 

"We, the undersigned electors of the City of Toronto ask City Council to pass a by-law redividing the City of Toronto into wards, in accordance with s. 129 of the City of Toronto Act, SO 2006, c11, Sched A.  We further ask that such wards be based on the new boundaries for the federal electoral districts located in Toronto proposed by the 2012 Federal Electoral Boundaries Commission for Ontario in its Report in either its current form or as amended after receiving objections from the House of Commons. 

 

We further request that these new wards be in place for the 2014 Toronto Municipal Election."

 

The City Solicitor and City Clerk have reviewed the petition and determined it to be both valid and sufficient.

 

This report outlines the legislative requirements, Council's options and the possible consequences of exercising any of the options.

Background Information

(July 12, 2013) Report from the City Clerk and the City Solicitor on Petition to Redivide Ward Boundaries (CC37.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60165.pdf
(June 27, 2013) Appendix 1 - Copy of Petition received on June 27,2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60246.pdf
Appendix 2 - By-law to redivide the City of Toronto into Wards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60247.pdf
Appendix 3 - Ward Boundary Provisions, Cityof Toronto Act, 2006 s. 128 and 129
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60248.pdf
Appendix 4 - Map of Proposed Federal Electoral Boundaries within the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60249.pdf
(July 3, 2013) Report from the City Clerk on petition received under Section 129 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 - Request for Ward Boundary Changes - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60118.pdf

Communications

(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Kara Isert, President, Corktown Residents & Business Association (CC.Supp.CC37.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39092.pdf
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Steve Lowden, President, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (CC.New.CC37.2.2)
(July 17, 2013) E-mail from Benjamin Sharma (CC.New.CC37.2.3)
(July 18, 2013) E-mail from Matthew McGuire, President, Toronto Taxpayers Coalition (CC.New.CC37.2.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-39151.pdf

CC37.3 - Results of the Interest Arbitration Process with the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters Association, Local 3888

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director of Human Resources

Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to make appropriate one-time adjustments to the 2013 Operating Budget of Fire Services to reflect the provisions of the Arbitration Award as detailed in this report.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the results of the Interest Arbitration process with The Toronto Professional Fire Fighters Association, Local 3888 and a summary of the award issued by Arbitration Board chaired by Kevin Burkett on June 26, 2013.

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director of Human Resources on the Results of the Interest Arbitration Process with the Toronto Professional Fire Fighters Association, Local 3888 (CC37.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60120.pdf
Attachment 1: Appendix A - Summary of Association Issues
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60121.pdf
Attachment 2: Appendix B - Summary of City Issues
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60122.pdf
Attachment 3: Arbitration Award, Renewal Collective Agreement, City of Toronto and the TPFFA, Local 3888
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60123.pdf

CC37.4 - Provincial Amalgamation Loans

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
July 10, 2013: A revised report has been submitted on this Item. The third paragraph of the Summary section required a technical clarification.

Origin

(July 3, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

This report provides information related to the provincial loans provided to the City in 1998 and 1999 for the purpose of amalgamation, the status of those loans, as well the implications associated with the Province's recent  decision to  forgive the outstanding balance of the loans over a three-year time period (2014 to 2016).
 
On an accounting basis, following generally accepted accounting principles, the liability for the loan balance and accrued interest will be eliminated as the Province advises that the loan is no longer payable.  Accounting allows for professional judgement and is guided by the terms and conditions of any provincial agreement.
 
Once complete, the forgiveness of the loan will lower the City's outstanding debt by $170 million.  Accrued interest expense of $42 million will be cancelled and can be taken into revenue for future budgets.  There are no ongoing benefits to the City's operating budget beyond the elimination of the related $4.7 million annual debt charge provision in 2014.

Background Information

(July 3, 2013) REVISED Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Provincial Amalgamation Loans (CC37.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60124.pdf

CC37.5 - The Impact of the Loss of the Provincial Toronto Pooling Compensation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager and Deputy City Manager, Cluster A

Recommendations

The City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A recommend that:

 

1.         City Council request the Province to reconsider the elimination of the Toronto Pooling Compensation (TPC) by 2016 or at a minimum maintain the Social Housing component of the TPC funding.

 

2.         City Council request the Province to harmonize, province wide, the shelter payments received by households living in rent-geared-to-income (RGI) and non-RGI housing who receive social assistance (i.e. Ontario Works or Ontario Disability Support Program) consistent with the recommendation set out in The Special Housing Working Group's Report, Putting People First, Transforming Toronto Community Housing, approved by Council on October 30, 31 and November 1, 2012.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to outline the implications of the elimination of $149.4 million in provincial Toronto Pooling Compensation (TPC) support to the City of Toronto, which will be considered during the 2014 operating budget and future-year processes. The recent announcement by the Province (see Appendix B) indicates that, beginning next year, this funding will be phased out over three years from 2014 to 2016. 

 

These changes will eliminate funding sources in the City's Employment and Social Services division of $35 million and the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration division of  $114 million over three years as detailed in the Financial Impact section of this report. 

 

The original 2008 Provincial schedule contemplated reducing the social assistance portion of the TPC while leaving the social housing funding intact until at least 2018 (See Appendix A). This changed with the revised schedule which now calls for the entire TPC to be completely eliminated by 2016.

 

Concurrently, the Province has announced the cancellation of the City's amalgamation debt to the Province, as described in the companion report entitled, Provincial Amalgamation Loans. The announcement will enable the City to reverse approximately $42 million in accumulated budget provisions for interest on the loan, and partially delay the impact of these funding changes, as described in this report.

 

 

GTA Equalization Funding (Pooling)

 

As of January 1, 1998, as part of the Local Services Realignment (LSR) initiative of the Province, municipalities throughout Ontario became responsible for social housing costs and an increased share of social assistance costs (plus a number of other very significant changes to the provincial-municipal fiscal arrangements).  Under GTA Pooling, regional municipalities within the GTA were required to make transfer payments to the benefit of the City of Toronto to help equalize or balance the cost of social housing and social assistance across the GTA, and partially mitigate the unequal impacts of LSR.

 

 

Provincial-Municipal Fiscal and Service Delivery Review (PMFSDR)

 

In late 2006, Ontario, AMO and Toronto began the Provincial-Municipal Fiscal and Service Delivery Review (PMFSDR).  The final report released October 18, 2008, announced landmark changes to the provincial municipal fiscal arrangements, including provincial agreement to:

 

           fully fund the Ontario Disability Support Program (ODSP) and the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) program;

           upload municipal costs of Ontario Works (OW) benefits (income and employment assistance) over nine years;

           share costs of administration of OW up to the approved allocation; and

           provide municipal assistance to offset the costs of court security over seven years up to a maximum of $125 million annually.

 

The funding responsibility for social housing was specifically excluded from the discussions.

 

In 2007, during the PMFSDR process, the Province began the phasing out of GTA Pooling.  The Province reduced the cost to the contributing GTA regional municipalities over a 7 year period by over $200 million annually, providing them with a financial benefit from the 1998 re-alignment initiative.  The funding received by the City through Pooling was in turn assumed by the Province, which provided the City with grants under the Ontario Municipal Partnership Fund (OMPF) program.

 

The uploading of social assistance costs under PMFSDR meant that the need for OMPF grants off-setting municipal social services costs would be significantly reduced.  The Province used the opportunity to modify the OMPF program. Under the changes, Toronto no longer qualified for any OMPF funds to off-set the elimination of GTA Pooling despite the fact that the funding of social housing remains a municipal responsibility.

 

 

Toronto Pooling Compensation (TPC)

 

In recognition of the impact of the loss of GTA Pooling on Toronto, as part of PMFSDR the Province announced a special pooling compensation grant to the City known as TPC beginning in 2008 with an accompanying schedule by year to 2018 (see Appendix A).

 

By 2018, the changes to the grant amount would be adjusted to $115 million annually. The schedule reflects the phase-out of municipal pooling payments and the completion of the scheduled upload to the social assistance cost sharing arrangements.

 

The recent announcement by the Province indicates that rather than continuing to provide this support for social housing, it will be phased out completely, reducing the PMFSDR upload benefit to the City by one-third.

 

Under the provincial Housing Services Act, 2011 (HSA) the City of Toronto is legislated to provide social housing operators, including Toronto Community Housing (TCH) with funding to administer social housing. In 2013, the City will transfer an estimated $466.4 million to all of its social housing providers.  Under this legislation, the City is required to fund and maintain the existing number of rent-geared-to-income (RGI) social housing units in perpetuity.  As the City has no flexibility to change these service levels, funding for social housing will have to be found either from increased property taxes or service reductions.

 

Overall, Toronto provides 76% of the social housing in the GTA including 90% of the GTA's public housing or nearly 40% of the total social housing available in the province. This represents a significant concentration of social housing as Toronto has only 20% of the total provincial population.

 

In June 2013, the City of Toronto and TCH launched the "Close the Housing Gap" public education campaign to re-engage the federal and provincial governments in investing in Toronto's aging social housing stock.  At a time when Ontario and Canadian municipalities are advocating for increased funding from governments for housing, the Province, through its recent announcement, is reducing its support to Toronto for social housing.

 

The Provincial decision exacerbates the pressure on the overall system of services which already faces a social housing waiting list of over 87,000 households, increased strain on emergency shelter capacity, a growing social housing repair backlog, prescriptive provincial policy and divestment by both the federal and provincial governments.

 

In addition, the accelerated reduction of the TPC funding creates pressures in the Toronto Employment and Social Services operating budget, which will have to be offset through a combination of service reductions, savings in administration and drawing on reserves.  Together these funding reductions will impact the City's most vulnerable residents.

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A on the Impact of the Loss of the Provincial Toronto Pooling Compensation (CC37.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60172.pdf
Appendix A - Letter (June 13, 2013) to the Mayor from the Minister of Finance, Ministry of Finance indicating the loss of TPC funding
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60202.pdf
Appendix B - Letter (November 5, 2008) to the City Manager from the Assistant Deputy Minister, Ministry of Finance indicating a payment schedule by year 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60201.pdf

CC37.6 - Report on an Inquiry: Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids - Connect Consulting Solutions and Orgaworld Canada Ltd.

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
July 15, 2013: A revised report has been submitted on this Item. CC37.6 and CC37.7 will be considered together

Origin

(July 8, 2013) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

Recommendations

The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider the attached report together with the Lobbyist Registrar’s Report on an Inquiry: Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids – Connect Consulting Solutions and Lystek International Inc.

 

2.         City Council receive the attached Report on an Inquiry: Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids – Connect Consulting Solutions and Orgaworld Canada Ltd.

Summary

This is a report by the Lobbyist Registrar on an inquiry under s. 169 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and § 140-35B of the Lobbying By-law to determine whether Connect Consulting Solutions (CCS) and officials of Orgaworld Canada Ltd. (Orgaworld) lobbied on behalf of Orgaworld in relation to a procurement process for the beneficial use of biosolids generated at Ashbridges Bay, Request for Proposal 9155-11-7185, contrary to § 140-41A of the Lobbying By-law.  Section 140-41A provides:

 

A.  Lobbyists shall not communicate in relation to a procurement process except as permitted by applicable procurement policies

 

The Lobbyist Registrar found that CCS consultant lobbyists and an official of Orgaworld did not lobby in relation to this procurement process.  The Registrar reinstated the registrations of CCS to lobby on behalf of Orgaworld.

 

The Registrar also found that CCS consultant lobbyists and Orgaworld lobbied public office holders without being registered, contrary to § 140-10, which provides:

 

No person shall lobby a public office holder without being registered as required under Articles II, III or IV, unless otherwise exempted under this chapter.

 

CCS consultant lobbyists arranged meetings with councillors on behalf of Orgaworld; and both CCS consultant lobbyists and an Orgaworld official met with members of Council when they were not registered to lobby.

 

CCS also failed to report lobbying activities on behalf of Orgaworld when registered, contrary to § 140-17.

 

In addition, CCS failed to advise its client Orgaworld of its obligations under the Lobbying By-law, contravening § 140-43A, which provides:

 

Lobbyists shall inform their client, employer or organization of the obligations under this chapter.

 

In the interest of transparency, the Lobbyist Registrar asked Orgaworld and CCS to register and report their previously unreported and unregistered lobbying activities.

 

The Registrar cautioned the lobbyists that they must comply with the Lobbying By-law, and asked that they attend training sessions on the Lobbying By-law offered by the Office of the Lobbyist Registrar.

 

Orgaworld and CCS received the findings and disposition in this report, which are not disputed.  Orgaworld has attended a training session, has registered and reported its lobbying activities.  CCS is scheduled to attend a training session, has updated its registrations to report lobbying activities in 2011 on behalf of Orgaworld.  Orgaworld has also informed the Registrar that the employee who lobbied on its behalf in 2011 is no longer with the firm in any capacity.

 

Background Information

(July 8, 2013) REVISED Covering Report from the Lobbyist Registrar submitting an Inquiry Report on Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids - Connect Consulting Solutions and Orgaworld Canada Ltd.(CC37.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60127.pdf
(July 8, 2013) REVISED Inquiry Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids - Connect Consulting Solutions and Orgaworld Canada Ltd.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60125.pdf

CC37.7 - Report on an Inquiry: Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids - Connect Consulting Solutions and Lystek International Inc.

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
CC37.6 and CC37.7 will be considered together

Origin

(July 8, 2013) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

Recommendations

The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider the attached report together with the Lobbyist Registrar’s Report on an Inquiry: Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids – Connect Consulting Solutions and Orgaworld Canada Ltd.

 

2.         City Council receive the attached Report on an Inquiry: Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids – Connect Consulting Solutions and Lystek International Inc.

Summary

This is a report by the Lobbyist Registrar on an inquiry under s. 169 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and § 140-35B of the Lobbying By-law to determine whether Connect Consulting Solutions (CCS) lobbying on behalf of Lystek International Inc. (Lystek) and Lystek lobbied in relation to a Request for Proposal for the beneficial use of biosolids generated at Ashbridges Bay, Request for Proposal 9155-11-7185 (the RFP), contrary to § 140-41A of the Lobbying By-law.  Section 140-41A provides:

 

A.        Lobbyists shall not communicate in relation to a procurement process except as permitted by applicable procurement policies

 

The Lobbyist Registrar found that CCS and Lystek lobbied about the RFP during the period when lobbying was prohibited by the RFP document and City policy.

 

The Registrar also found that CCS consultant lobbyists and Lystek lobbied public office holders without being registered, contrary to § 140-10, which provides:

 

No person shall lobby a public office holder without being registered as required under Articles II, III or IV, unless otherwise exempted under this chapter.

 

CCS consultant lobbyists arranged meetings with councillors on behalf of Lystek; and both CCS consultant lobbyists and a Lystek official met with members of Council when they were not registered to lobby.

 

CCS also failed to report lobbying activities on behalf of Lystek when registered, contrary to § 140-17.

 

In addition, CCS failed to advise its client Lystek of its obligations under the Lobbying By-law, contravening § 140-43A, which provides:

 

Lobbyists shall inform their client, employer or organization of the obligations under this chapter.

 

The Registrar suspended the registrations related to the RFP during the period when lobbying was prohibited under § 140-41A.  In the interest of transparency, the Registrar has permitted and requested CCS and Lystek to register and report all of their lobbying activities before June 30 and after October 27, 2011. 

 

The Registrar has cautioned CCS and Lystek that they must comply with the Lobbying By-law; and has requested that CCS and Lystek attend training sessions on the Lobbying By-law offered by the Office of the Lobbyist Registrar. 

 

Lystek and CCS received the findings and disposition in this report.  The parties do not dispute the findings or disposition.  CCS is scheduled to attend a training session, has updated its registrations and has submitted a new registration to report lobbying activities in 2011.  Lystek has registered its lobbying activities.

Background Information

(July 8, 2013) Covering Report from the Lobbyist Registrar submitting an Inquiry Report on Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids - Connect Consulting Solutions and Lystek International Inc. (CC37.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60128.pdf
(July 8, 2013) Inquiry Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on Lobbying in Relation to a Procurement Process for the Beneficial Use of Biosolids - Connect Consulting Solutions and Lystek International Inc.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60126.pdf

CC37.8 - 215 Sherway Gardens Road - Ontario Municipal Board Decision - Development Charge Complaint

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the confidential recommendations in Attachment 1.

 

2.         City Council authorize the public release of the confidential recommendations in Attachment 1 if adopted by Council.

Summary

On June 20, 2013, the Ontario Municipal Board (“OMB”) issued a decision regarding a development charge complaint respecting 215 Sherway Gardens Road.  The OMB ordered the City to repay an amount of $397,941.00.  In order to protect the City’s appeal rights, the City Solicitor filed a notice of motion to seek leave to appeal to the Divisional Court within the required time frame.  The Confidential Attachment to this report seeks Council’s instructions on this matter.

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on 215 Sherway Gardens Road - OMB Decision - Development Charge Complaint (CC37.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60140.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC37.9 - Wheel-Trans is Watching: An Investigation into the Toronto Transit Commission's Use of Video Surveillance on Wheel-Trans Vehicles

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 9, 2013) Report from the Ombudsman

Recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt this investigation report.

Summary

In accordance with section 170(2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA), I am providing the attached report which represents a concluded investigation into Wheel-Trans' use of video surveillance to reassess eligibility of riders.

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Covering Report from the Ombudsman submitting an Investigation Report on Wheel-Trans' use of video surveillance to reassess eligibility of riders (CC37.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60144.pdf
Wheel-Trans is Watching - Investigation Report (July 2013) from the Ombudsman into the Toronto Transit Commission's Use of Video Surveillance on Wheel-Trans Vehicles
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60145.pdf

CC37.10 - Enwave Energy Corporation - Consent and Acknowledgement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 9, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Recommendations

The Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer recommends that:

 

1.         Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to enter into, execute and deliver a consent and acknowledgement (the “Consent and Acknowledgement”) to  Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada ("Sun Life") and to a Collateral Agent to be appointed pursuant to a General Security Agreement to be granted by Enwave, whereby the City consents to the assignment by Enwave of  its interest in the Energy Transfer Agreement dated January 18, 2002 between the City and Enwave, as amended, (the “Energy Transfer Agreement”) to Sun Life and to BNY Trust Company of Canada as security for credit facilities negotiated by Enwave and its lenders; provided, however, that the terms and conditions of the Consent and Acknowledgement, and any related documents in which the City has an interest, are satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the City Solicitor and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to deliver and execute, if necessary, on behalf of the City, any additional documents that the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the City Solicitor determine are necessary to give effect to Recommendation 1 above.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain Council authority to provide a Consent and Acknowledgement to Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and to a collateral agent for the benefit of the secured creditors of Enwave Energy Corporation ("Enwave") under various Financing Agreements, regarding Enwave’s proposed assignment of its interest in the Energy Transfer Agreement dated January 18, 2002 between the City and Enwave, as amended.  This report is being submitted directly to Council to permit Enwave to meet certain contractual deadlines.

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Enwave Energy Corporation - Consent and Acknowledgement (CC37.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60167.pdf

CC37.11 - Integrity Commissioner Annual Report - 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Will be considered after Member Motions on Wednesday, July 17

Origin

(July 8, 2013) Report from the Integrity Commmissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that City Council:

 

1.         Endorse moving to a full time Integrity Commissioner commencing with the appointment of the next Integrity Commissioner in September 2014, and request the City Manager and City Clerk to report on the financial and any other implications of this change through the 2014 operating budget process.

Summary

The Integrity Commissioner reports annually to Council on the work of the office. This report is for the period from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2013.

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Report from the Integrity Commissioner on the Integrity Commissioner Annual Report - 2013 (CC37.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60168.pdf
Appendix 1 - Summary of Activities of the Integrity Commissioner: July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60176.pdf
Appendix 2 - Code of Conduct Provisions Applicable to Elections
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60177.pdf
Appendix 3 - Joint Interpretation Bulletin: Lobbying and Municipal Elections at the City of Toronto - July 23, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60179.pdf
Appendix 4 - Integrity Commissioner's Office Budget and Expenditures July 1, 2012 - June 30, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60180.pdf

CC37.12 - Report on Violation of Code of Conduct for Members of Council: Councillor Mike Layton

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 8, 2013) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.         Council adopt a finding that Councillor Layton breached Article XII of the Code of Conduct.

2.         Council adopt a finding that no further action be taken because Councillor Layton has apologized to the City Manager.

Summary

On April 8, 2013, a member of the public filed a formal complaint with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner alleging that Councillor Mike Layton had violated Article XII (Conduct Respecting Staff) of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (“Code of Conduct”) as a result of public comments made by Councillor Layton to a variety of media outlets about the City Manager's Report entitled New Casino and Development in Toronto (“The Casino Report”).

 

This Report recommends to Council a finding that Councillor Layton breached Article XII of the Code of Conduct. An apology was made to the City Manager, who was completely satisfied with that outcome. For the reasons set out below, no further action is recommended to City Council.

Background Information

(July 8, 2013) Report from the Integrity Commissions on Violation of Code of Conduct for Members of Council: Councillor Mike Layton (CC37.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60181.pdf

CC37.13 - Report on Violation of Code of Conduct for Members of Council: Councillor Adam Vaughan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
July 11, 2013: A revised report has been submitted on this Item. The second paragraph of the Summary has been revised.

Origin

(July 8, 2013) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.         Council adopt a finding that Councillor Vaughan breached Article XII of the Code of Conduct.

2.         Council adopt a finding that no further action be taken because Councillor Vaughan has apologized to the City Manager.

Summary

On April 8, 2013, a member of the public filed a formal complaint with the Office of the Integrity Commissioner alleging that Councillor Adam Vaughan had violated Article XII (Conduct Respecting Staff) of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (“Code of Conduct”) as a result of public comments made by Councillor Vaughan to a variety of media outlets about the City Manager's Report entitled New Casino and Development in Toronto ("The Casino Report").

 

This report recommends to Council a finding that Councillor Vaughan breached Article XII of the Code of Conduct. An apology was made to the City Manager, who was completely satisfied with that outcome. For the reasons set out below, no further action is recommended to City Council.

Background Information

(July 8, 2013) REVISED Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Violation of Code of Conduct for Members of Council: Councillor Adam Vaughan (CC37.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60183.pdf

CC37.14 - Proposed Settlement of Litigation Arising from the September 24, 2010 Fire at 200 Wellesley Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege; and Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board

Origin

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.         City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and pertains to litigation or potential litigation.  City Council authorize the public release of all or a portion of the confidential instructions once adopted by City Council at the discretion of the City Solicitor; and

 

3.         The appropriate City staff be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Summary

This report seeks instructions regarding a proposed settlement of an action commenced by the City against Greenwin Inc. ("Greenwin") to recover costs incurred by the City in providing emergency human services to residents of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation ("TCHC") property located at 200 Wellesley Street ("200 Wellesley") following a fire that occurred on September 24, 2010 (the "City's Claim"). The details of the proposed settlement are discussed in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on Proposed Settlement of Litigation Arising from the September 24, 2010 Fire at 200 Wellesley Street (CC37.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60185.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC37.15 - Payments in lieu of Taxes for Billy Bishop City Airport

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Confidential Communication CC37.15.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege; and Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board

Origin

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor and the Treasurer

Recommendations

The City Solicitor and the Treasurer recommend that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.         City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1, including all Appendices, remain confidential as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and pertains to litigation or potential litigation.  City Council authorize the public release of all or a portion of the confidential instructions once adopted by City Council at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

 

3.         The appropriate City staff be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Summary

This report provides an update on the status of the dispute with the Toronto Port Authority (TPA) over Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) for the Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (BBTCA) and seeks instructions on the issues.

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor and the Treasurer on Payments in lieu of Taxes for Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport (CC37.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60188.pdf
REVISED Confidential Attachment 1

Communications

(July 15, 2013) Letter from Geoffrey A. Wilson, President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Port Authority - this letter is confidential as it relates to litigation or potential litigation (CC.New.CC37.15.1)

CC37.16 - Appointment of Citizens to the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc.

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Confidential communication CC37.16.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc.

Origin

(July 9, 2013) Report from Mayor Rob Ford

Recommendations

The Corporation Nominating Panel recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report to serve at the pleasure of Council as members of the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc., including one individual to serve as Chair of the Board of Directors, effective July 29, 2013, for a term ending June 23, 2015, with a renewal term of two years, or until a successor is appointed;

 

2.         City Council identify the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternate members of the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc. to be approached to determine their continued interest and eligibility for the Board for consideration by the Corporation Nominating Panel for appointment to the Board, in the order listed, should a citizen vacancy occur;

 

3.         Confidential Attachment 1 be made public following City Council’s approval and after the individuals named therein have been notified of Council's decision;

 

4.         the contents of Confidential Attachment 2 to this report be kept in their entirety confidential after consideration of this report by Council; and

 

5.         City Council request the Integrity Commissioner to investigate and report back to City Council on the circumstances of an alleged breach of confidentiality which disclosed to the Toronto Star the Corporation Nominating Panel's confidential recommendations on appointments to Build Toronto, prior to City Council's consideration of the appointments at its meeting held on June 11, 12 and 13, 2013.

Summary

The Mayor has transmitted and recommended adoption of the report from the Chair of the Corporation Nominating Panel containing the Panel’s recommendations for the appointment of additional citizens to the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc. and the identification of alternate members to be considered for appointment by City Council in the event of future vacancies on this Board.

 

The appointment of Directors to the Board of Build Toronto was considered by City Council at its meeting held on June 11, 12 and 13, 2013 when Council appointed six citizens to the Build Board and referred the final citizen appointment and the identification of alternates back to the Panel for further consideration. However, since that time, one of the citizen directors appointed by City Council and two of the incumbent directors have resigned from the Board, resulting in there being four vacant positions on the Build Toronto Board.

 

The Panel was composed of Councillor Ford (Chair) and Councillors Crisanti and Nunziata. Since Council’s June meeting, the Panel interviewed a further six candidates and is recommending the appointment of four persons to the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc., one of whom is recommended to serve as Chair of the Board, and the identification of two alternate citizen Board members who may be considered for appointment in the event of future vacancies on this Board.

 

The Panel also recommends that City Council request that the Integrity Commissioner investigate and report back to Council on the circumstances of an alleged breach of confidentiality which disclosed to the Toronto Star the Panel's confidential recommendations on appointments to Build Toronto prior to their consideration by City Council.

Background Information

(July 9, 2013) Transmittal from Mayor Rob Ford on the Appointment of Citizen Members to the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc. (CC37.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60191.pdf
(July 9, 2013) Report from the Chair, Corporation Nominating Panel on the Appointment of Citizen Members to the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60192.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Recommended Citizen Appointments to the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc.
Confidential Attachment 2 - Recommended Alternate Citzen Members of the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc.

Communications

(July 19, 2013) Submission from Councillor Frances Nunziata - this submission is confidential as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Board of Directors of Build Toronto Inc. (CC.New.CC37.16.1)

CC37.17 - Scarborough Rapid Transit Options

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's Key Matter and first Item of business on Wednesday, July 17th.

The City Manager has submitted a copy of his presentation and a Briefing Note on this Item (CC37.17a and CC37.17b)

Communications CC37.17.1 to CC37.17.25 have been submitted on this Item.
July 15, 2013: A revised report has been submitted on this Item.

July 16, 2013 - For a 12 hour period on July 15, the map contained on page 16 of the City Manager's Report was blacked out due to a conversion error in the creation of the PDF version of the document. The document has been fixed and the map now appears in the document. However, the old version may be cached in some browsers which may cause trouble for readers. As a convenience, he have posted the map as a stand alone attachment listed below. We apologize for the inconvenience .

Origin

(July 12, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that City Council consider the following options with respect to rapid transit options for Scarborough:

 

A.        City Council confirm its support for the Scarborough LRT project under the Master Agreement.

 

OR

 

B.        City Council confirm its support for the  Scarborough Subway and:

 

(1)        Authorize the City Manager to amend the Master Agreement, and, if necessary, enter into a separate agreement with Metrolinx and the Province, to:

 

(a)         remove the Scarborough LRT from the description of the program to be constructed by Metrolinx under the Master Agreement (the "Program");

 

(b)         amend the overall Program budget by reducing it by $1.8 Billion representing the anticipated cost of constructing the Scarborough LRT (the "LRT Amount");

 

(c)         ensure that the Master Agreement continues to apply to the interchange between the Scarborough Subway and the Sheppard East LRT at Sheppard East Station, and the Eglinton Crosstown LRT at Kennedy Station;

 

(d)        redirect to the City for the purpose of the construction of the Scarborough Subway, the following amounts:

 

(i)         the LRT Amount (defined above as $1.8 Billion), indexed by an appropriate cost escalation factor from 2010 to the date of transfer to the City (the "Indexed LRT Amount"), payable to the City in a manner to be agreed upon by the parties having regard to ensuring that the City's financing charges or contract payments related to the Indexed LRT Amount are fully offset over the life of the City's financing, or contract payments in respect of the Indexed LRT Amount; and

 

(ii)        the estimated value, as agreed to by the parties, of any costs which would have been borne by Metrolinx under the Master Agreement in respect of  the Scarborough LRT  related to operations, capital maintenance, and such other costs as may be negotiated between the parties; and

 

(e)         make any further amendments to the Master Agreement as may be necessary to reflect the removal of the Scarborough LRT from the Program.

 

all on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the City Manager and TTC Chief Executive Officer, in consultation with any other relevant City officials, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

(2)        Commit to funding the City's share of the cost of construction of a Scarborough Subway by:

 

(a)        Directing the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to prepare a Development Charge By-law to include the City's share of capital costs in respect of the Scarborough Subway project for  Council consideration in 2014

 

(b)        Requesting the Province of Ontario to make appropriate amendments to the Development Charges Act for the purposes of the Scarborough Subway Project similar to those made by the Province for the Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension project

 

(c)        Requesting the Federal Government to contribute Toronto's fair share of federal funding under the P3 Canada Fund, the Building Canada Fund and all other available sources of federal funding for the construction of the Scarborough Subway.

 

(d)       Committing to a property tax increase over three years, dedicated to funding a Scarborough Subway, in an amount between 1.1% and  2.4%  (depending upon the amount of funding received through Recommendations B(2)(a) and (c)), on the residential property class, and 1/3 of such a rate increase on the non-residential property classes (in accordance with current City policy), starting with a minimum tax rate increase in 2014 of 0.5% on the residential property class, together with the corresponding 1/3 rate increase on the non-residential property classes, with the balance of the residential and non-residential three year rate increase to be phased-in in the years 2015 and 2016.

 

(3)        Direct the appropriate City officials to seek the necessary approval under the Environmental Assessment Act be sought using the Transit Project Approval Process as set out in Ontario Regulation 231/08, as amended.

 

(4)        Authorize the appropriate City officials to take all actions necessary to give effect to this recommendation.

Summary

This report has been prepared in conjunction with the CEO of the TTC.

 

Purpose of the Report

 

City Council confirmed its support for the four Light Rail Transit (LRT) projects -Scarborough LRT, Eglinton Crosstown LRT, Sheppard East LRT, and Finch West LRT - in February and March 2012. Council approved the terms of the Master Agreement for the delivery of the four LRT projects in October 2012, and the agreement was signed by the City, TTC and Metrolinx in November 2012 ("The Master Agreement"). The Master Agreement provides the legal framework for the delivery of the Toronto Light Rail Transit Program, an $8.7 billion investment in Toronto's transit infrastructure.

 

In May 2013, City Council indicated support for the extension of the Bloor-Danforth subway line from Kennedy Station to Scarborough Centre and Sheppard Avenue (the "Scarborough Subway"). As a result, Metrolinx has requested clarification on the City's commitment to the Master Agreement and the Scarborough LRT project, in a letter received June 28, 2013. The letter outlines sunk costs and other implications associated with a change in direction by the City, in addition to the transfer of $320 million of the approved $1.8 billion ($2010) Scarborough LRT budget to the Eglinton Crosstown LRT. Further, Metrolinx intends to suspend work on the Scarborough LRT if Council confirmation of support for the project is not received by August 2, 2013.

 

The purpose of this report is to present information on the potential financial, planning and other implications of pursuing an extension of the Bloor-Danforth subway instead of the Scarborough LRT. A preliminary review of the issues from a financial, planning, legal, and project delivery perspective are outlined.

 

Rapid Transit Options: LRT and Subway

 

TTC staff have identified that either an LRT or subway can effectively serve the Scarborough RT transit corridor. Each technology option offers distinct advantages. The main benefits of the subway option are higher speed, elimination of the transfer at Kennedy station, and projected higher ridership. Further there is no need to shut down the Scarborough RT during construction of a subway extension. Conversely, the LRT option provides greater overall geographic coverage, more stations providing greater local access, larger population served, and reliable high quality service at a lower cost. 

 

The LRT option has been studied more extensively. The lack of time to consider all necessary assumptions related to a review of the subway option introduces risk when considering transportation network and land use implications. An issue requiring further review is the impact of the subway extension on the transit network as a whole. Further work is required to accurately report on forecast subway ridership as it relates to network planning considerations.

 

In terms of land use planning, the proposed extension of the Bloor-Danforth subway would pass through largely stable residential areas and the primary trip generation points would be the Scarborough Centre and the Sheppard Avenue terminal. The proposed subway station at Lawrence Avenue is largely surrounded by a stable, low density area. Because the subway’s design capacity exceeds 2031 forecast ridership levels, a robust program to attract significant employment growth (and to a lesser extent residential growth) to the Scarborough Centre will be required to increase ridership. Conversely, the LRT line will operate in an established corridor of proven transit demand that is currently being under-served by the at-capacity RT line.

 

Financial Implications

 

The preliminary estimate of the cost of the subway option is $2.3 billion ($2010), plus certain transitional costs related to continuing and later dismantling the SRT. The estimates in the report are based on the full Metrolinx budget for the LRT option being transferred to the City to offset $1.8 billion of these costs. When the net cost is escalated from the 2010 base year to the expected time of expenditure, the incremental capital cost is estimated to be $1.1 billion. It should be noted that currently, Metrolinx has reduced the budget for the Scarborough LRT project and has therefore only offered to provide a credit or offset of $1.48 billion.

 

The City expects to obtain changes to the Development Charges Act for this project, similar to those that were provided for the Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE) project, to allow a portion of these costs to be recovered from development charges under a future by-law amendment.  Furthermore, the City should be able to further offset these costs if it can qualify for federal infrastructure or P3 Canada funding similar to that obtained for major transit investments in Kitchener-Waterloo and Ottawa.

 

Based on these variables, assumptions, and subject to various risks related to inflation, cost estimation and interest rates, staff estimate that the City could fund the incremental capital cost through a tax increase of 1.1 – 2.4% over the next three years. If it is Council's intention to proceed with the subway option, it is recommended this Council commit to a minimum dedicated increase of 0.5% in 2014 to ensure that the appropriate funding is in place at the time of the decision.

 

The subway option would also require the City to be the owner/operator of the new asset, and therefore be responsible for incremental operating and capital maintenance costs, less the offsets the City is able to obtain from Metrolinx for the operating and capital maintenance costs Metrolinx would avoid by not proceeding with the LRT.

 

Implications for Toronto's Long Term Transit Priorities

 

As directed by Council the City is currently undertaking a comprehensive review of Toronto's transportation priorities through the Official Plan Review process (i.e. "Feeling Congested") to identify future transit infrastructure that best meets city building objectives, integrates transit and land use planning, and complements other transportation modes. A report on future rapid transit priorities will be presented to Council at the conclusion of the Official Plan review process. Based on ongoing preliminary work the top five unfunded rapid transit proposals include Waterfont West LRT, Don Mills LRT, Downtown Relief Line (East), Scarborough Malvern LRT and Waterfont East LRT.  The Bloor-Danforth subway extension places in the next five rapid transit proposals that also include Jane LRT, Steeles West LRT/BRT, Downtown Relief Line (extension to Eglinton Avenue), and Eglinton LRT extension to Pearson Airport.  The decision to adopt subway technology could impact the ability to fund the other priorities that are ultimately established through the current Official Plan review process. Further review and refinement of the rapid transit decision-making framework will occur over the next several months as City staff conclude public consultations and complete the due diligence exercise currently underway.

 

An important issue that is not clearly understood at this time is how a subway extension might impact on the transit network as a whole.  The ridership growth attributed to the extension of the Bloor-Danforth line would accelerate the need for other major system improvements to relieve overcrowding on the Yonge Subway, south of Bloor, and at Bloor-Yonge Station, as described in the Downtown Rapid Transit Expansion Study (2012). These would include capacity increases to Bloor-Yonge Station or the construction of a Relief Subway line, or equivalent, into the downtown.  Whether the DRL becomes a prerequisite to address higher ridership on the Bloor-Danforth line has not been studied in detail yet may become a critical determining factor. 

 

State of Good Repair and Infrastructure Priorities

 

The City would be required to debt finance a portion of the costs, resulting in an increase in the City's debt burden. It must be noted that the incremental capital and potential incremental capital maintenance costs outlined in this report, would be in addition to other capital state of good repair pressures. Council will have less financial flexibility to fund other key state of good repair and infrastructure priorities. The 2014-23 Capital Plan already identified $2.5 billion in new TTC capital needs (mainly state of good repair), $750 million plus for unfunded social housing repairs, and significant capital needs for Transportation Services, Toronto Water, etc. In addition, as noted above, there are likely other transit priorities to emerge from the Official Plan review process, and interests in other community infrastructure projects that are currently unfunded. Undertaking the subway project will reduce budget flexibility to address other Council priorities now and in the future.

 

Master Agreement Approval Process

 

This report outlines two options for Council's consideration with respect to rapid transit options for Scarborough. The first option recommends Council support the Scarborough LRT under the current Master Agreement.

 

The second option recommends that if Council confirms support for the Scarborough Subway, the City Manager be authorized to amend the Master Agreement and enter into an agreement with Metrolinx with respect to funds allocated to the Scarborough LRT. City Council should also commit to funding the share of the City's cost of constructing the Scarborough Subway.

 

It should be noted that the optional recommendation to support the Scarborough Subway includes the recommended terms upon which an agreement must be reached with Metrolinx in order to amend the Master Agreement. This may also require agreement with the Province in a separate form.  If no agreement is reached on the recommended terms, the Master Agreement remains a legally binding agreement whereby Metrolinx remains obliged to construct the Scarborough LRT. The City Manager would then be required to report back to Council for direction.

 

Background Information

(July 12, 2013) REVISED Report from the City Manager on Scarborough Rapid Transit Options (CC37.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60240.pdf
(June 28, 2013) Attachment 1 - letter from Bruce McCuaig, President and Chief Executive Officer, Metrolinx
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60241.pdf
Attachment 2 - City Planning, Comparison of Sheppard Transit Panel Criteria to Feeling Congested Criteria
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60242.pdf
Attachment 3 - SRT Conversion to Subway, High Level Estimate
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60243.pdf
Attachment 4 - Transit Right of Way and Technologies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60244.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Map contained on page 16 of the City Manager's Report (CC37.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60278.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Presentation by the City Manager on Scarborough Rapid Transit Options (CC37.17a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60291.pdf
(July 17, 2013) Briefing Note from the City Manager - Federal Funding for the Sheppard East LRT Project (CC37.17b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60303.pdf
(July 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager on Scarborough Rapid Transit Options - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-60197.pdf

Communications

(July 4, 2013) E-mail from Lynne Patterson (CC.Main.CC37.17.1)
(July 1, 2013) E-mail from Patricia Sinclair (CC.Main.CC37.17.2)
(July 5, 2013) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (CC.Main.CC37.17.3)
(July 11, 2013) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (CC.Supp.CC37.17.4)
(July 11, 2013) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (CC.Supp.CC37.17.5)
(July 13, 2013) Letter from Jack Brannigan (CC.Supp.CC37.17.6)
(July 15, 2013) Letter from Ross Snetsinger (CC.Supp.CC37.17.7)
(July 14, 2013) Letter from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.CC37.17.8)
(July 15, 2013) Letter from Eddie Chuan-Shun Ho (CC.Supp.CC37.17.9)
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Patricia Sinclair (CC.New.CC37.17.10)
(July 15, 2013) Submission from Tony O'Donohue (CC.New.CC37.17.11)
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Andrew Bourgeois (CC.New.CC37.17.12)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Sylvia Cowls (CC.New.CC37.17.13)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Louis-Charles Lavallée (CC.New.CC37.17.14)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Miguel Avila (CC.New.CC37.17.15)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Changyun Wang and Ayong Zhuang (CC.New.CC37.17.16)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Huixin Ma (CC.New.CC37.17.17)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Yaxiong Lei, Dongmei Liu, Keying Yang and Yaxiu Lei (CC.New.CC37.17.18)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Zhao Zijin and Xu Daoren (CC.New.CC37.17.19)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Zhao Ruiyun (CC.New.CC37.17.20)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Wenyao Weng and Fengying Xu (CC.New.CC37.17.21)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from Jeff Weng Linda (CC.New.CC37.17.22)
(July 15, 2013) E-mail from Jinchan Xu and Xueqin Zhao (CC.New.CC37.17.23)
(July 16, 2013) E-mail from John Alexopoulos (CC.New.CC37.17.24)
(July 17, 2013) E-mail from Jason McNeill (CC.New.CC37.17.25)

Member Motions - Meeting 37

MM37.1 - Minutes of Settlement with Giorgio Mammoliti - by Councillor Mike Del Grande, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Del Grande, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Manager to negotiate with Giorgio Mammoliti to adjust his Minutes of Settlement to reflect a reimbursement reasonably proportionate to that being paid by Adrian Heaps including payment within 30 days of Council’s approval.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Manager to execute revised Minutes of Settlement with Giorgio Mammoliti reflecting the terms set out in Recommendation 1 above.

Summary

At its meeting held on June 6, 7 and 8, 2012, City Council approved Minutes of Settlement with Giorgio Mammoliti (“Mammoliti”) wherein among other matters,  Mammoliti agreed to reimburse the 2006 compliance audit payments provided to him which were subsequently ruled by the Divisional Court and confirmed by the Court of Appeal to be outside of Council's authority.  Mammoliti agreed to reimburse the City in the amount of $56,768.65 in five annual payments which includes interest accrued over a period of 5 years.  When Mammoliti has made all required payments, the City will reimburse Mammoliti $20,000.00 on account of his legal fees.  Mammoliti has made the first payment required under the Minutes of Settlement.

 

At its meeting held on June 11, 12 and 13, 2013, Council approved Minutes of Settlement with Adrian Heaps which provides for a significantly lesser amount of reimbursement than that agreed to by Mammoliti.

 

In the interest of fairness and equity, it is appropriate that Council direct an adjustment to Mammoliti’s Minutes of Settlement to be reasonably consistent with the Heaps’ Minutes of Settlement.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.1)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60091.pdf
(July 17, 2013) Confidential Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

MM37.2 - Music City Alliance - The City of Toronto and City of Austin - by Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse the Austin-Toronto Music City Alliance, and direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to begin discussions with the City of Austin to finalize the framework and terms of the Music City Alliance.

Summary

On February 21, 2012, in response to Recommendation 3.5 in the Creative Capital Gains report to "investigate Toronto’s music industry and its economic impact, and develop a strategy to promote and foster Toronto’s music cluster", the Economic Development Committee referred Item ED11.8 to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, with a request that he, in conjunction with industry stakeholders, develop a series of short, medium, and long-term recommendations for government(s) and the Toronto Music Industry that would position Toronto as a leading live music tourist destination and promote and foster Toronto's music cluster.

 

Toronto has one of the largest music sectors in North America with an impressive and growing number of live music venues, recording studios, independent and major labels, music festivals and artists, and generates thousands of jobs and significant economic growth and tourism.

 

The City of Austin, recognized as the Live Music Capital of the World, shares many of the same characteristics of Toronto's music economy. Over the last twenty years, Austin, a city a third the size of Toronto, has created a music industry that generates three times as much economic activity as Toronto's does.

 

In communications between Toronto’s Mayor Ford and Austin’s Mayor Leffingwell, both agreed to work together to form a Music City Alliance that could develop opportunities for tourism and trade.

 

The concept of a Music City Alliance would provide a formalized structure and demonstrated commitment to promote and foster the music industry. Moreover, it would provide mutual opportunities for market growth, knowledge exchange, industry investment, and economic partnerships. A thriving music industry would bring more economic activity and jobs to both cities and create new opportunities for musicians and music lovers in both markets.

 

In response to discussions with Toronto music industry representatives and Councillors Colle and Crawford, the City of Austin passed a resolution to participate in a Music City Alliance as soon as similar legislation is passed by the City of Toronto.

 

Toronto needs to embrace this opportunity and demonstrate our shared commitment to promote and foster Toronto’s music cluster.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.2)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60093.pdf
City of Austin's Resolution on Music City Alliance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60094.pdf
Letter from Mayor Lee Leffingwell City of Austin on the Music City Alliance partnership program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60095.pdf
(March 7, 2013) Letter from Mayor Rob Ford addressed to Mayor Lee Leffingwell, City of Austin, on the Music City Alliance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60096.pdf
Agenda Item ED11.8, headed "Implementing Creative Capital Gains Recommendation 3.3 - Fostering Toronto's Music Cluster
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60097.pdf
The role of Music in the Austin Economy: Excerpt from Executive Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60098.pdf

MM37.3 - Supporting Improved Parking for Mopeds and Scooters - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on:

 

            a.         strategies to accommodate secure, off-street parking for limited-speed motorcycles and motor-assisted bicycles without compromising the sidewalk pedestrian clearway, driver sightlines, net bicycle parking spaces, or public safety, including but not limited to:

 

                        i.          increasing the supply of boulevard parking that is restricted to use by motor-assisted bicycles, limited-speed motorcycles, and/or motorcycles and vespas;

 

                        ii.         providing additional incentives to dedicate spaces in new developments to visitor spaces for motor-assisted bicycles, limited-speed motorcycles, and/or motorcycles and vespas;

 

                        iii.        options for treating certain small motorcycles, where appropriate, as limited-speed motorcycles despite provincial classification based on engine size, including a strategy to differentiate these vehicles for the purposes of enforcing parking regulations such as a special parking sticker; and

 

                        iv.        co-ordination with the construction of bicycle parking stations and the installation of other covered structures for bicycles to create new spaces for limited-speed motorcycles and motor-assisted bicycles; and

 

            b.         any changes to provincial legislation that would assist the City of Toronto in better sharing the public right-of-way between all users.

Summary

In recent years, the popularity of motor-assisted bicycles (mopeds) and limited-speed motorcycles (scooters) has greatly increased and they are now a common sight on many streets.  The City of Toronto should be encouraging the use of mopeds and scooters because, in a city challenged by gridlock, they take up less road and parking space and they use less fossil fuel.

 

However, our current rules and regulations for parking mopeds and scooters predate their reclassification by the Province of Ontario as types of motor vehicle and this has created some negative impacts.  Unlike bicycles, they must be parked on the street where they are vulnerable to theft or damage and occupy valuable paid-parking spaces that fund important services like parks, libraries, and road maintenance.  Riders who park on the sidewalk and block pedestrians or use City bicycle locks are currently fined by City of Toronto parking enforcement officers.

 

It is time to use common sense to bring our regulations into the twenty-first century and reap the rewards of increased moped and scooter ridership without reducing road safety or pedestrian comfort.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.3)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60100.pdf

Communications

(July 16, 2013) Petition from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22 - St. Paul's, containing the names of approximately 600 persons, concerning scooter riders and parking (MM.New.MM37.3.1)

MM37.4 - Parking considerations during events of municipal significance - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report back on a process whereby Community Councils can be authorized to assess the appropriateness of requesting police parking enforcement officials to give parking consideration for City events of municipal significance.

Summary

The current system of parking consideration allows Transportation staff to work with parking enforcement officers under particular conditions.  On religious holidays, for example, parking enforcement officers work with the Transportation Division to ensure that parking tickets are not issued within a certain geographical area and for a specific time period.

 

The current policy makes no provision, however, for special events of municipal significance, such as Taste of the Danforth, Salsa on St. Clair, etc.

 

The recommendation before Council is that staff report back on a more efficient system. Community Council can determine which events would be eligible for parking consideration because of their civic importance, determining the time and geographic area.

 

This change would help large event organizers better manage a welcoming event while also taking into account various tools to control parking.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.4)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60092.pdf

MM37.5 - Liquor Licence Infractions - Reducing incidence of infractions through the City of Toronto Act, 2006 - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Solicitor to consult with the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on what options exist in the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to address ongoing liquor licence infractions by businesses in the City of Toronto and what actions must be taken by the City to utilize existing provisions within the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to reduce the incidence of liquor licence infractions, and submit a report to the Licensing and Standards Committee on the results of the consultation.

Summary

There is a high incidence of crime reported in particular licensed establishments in the City that is worsened by the availability of alcohol. This is of particular concern when the establishment violates the terms of its liquor licence by operating as a booze can after it is required to stop its sale of alcohol. Violent crime, robberies, drugs, and prostitution are serious concerns associated with establishments with repeated liquor licence infractions.

 

The available courses of action currently known to the City to address repeated liquor licence infractions are limited and ineffectual. This Motion recommends exploring what options are available to the City through the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to address liquor licence infractions and the problems associated with recurring infractions at problem establishments.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.5)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60099.pdf

MM37.6 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from 90-100 Broadview Avenue to the Riverside District Business Improvement Area (BIA) for the Don Valley Parkway/Queen Street Bridge Beautification Project - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that $50,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded from Section 37 community benefits secured in connection with the development at 90-100 Broadview Avenue from source account XR3026-3700349 be released and directed towards the approved 2013 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for the design services for the Don Valley Parkway/Queen Street Bridge beautification and lighting project for the Riverside District Business Improvement Are.

Summary

Section 37 funds have been secured and received in connection with the development at 90-100 Broadview Avenue for Public Realm improvements in the Riverside District BIA.

 

The City has a long-standing partnership with the Riverside District BIA in the development and maintenance of streetscape improvements in the Riverside neighbourhood

 

The BIA is proposing a lighting beautification of the DVP/Queen Street Bridge. However, there is currently no funding included in the 2013 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for this project.

 

The beautification and lighting of the bridge will enhance the attractiveness of this iconic bridge in time for the Pan-Am Games.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.6)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60119.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60315.pdf

MM37.7 - Release of Section 37 Funds, 1030 King Street West, for the Preliminary Design of the King-Liberty Pedestrian/Cycling Bridge - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2013 Transportation Services Capital Budget by $500,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 1030 King Street West (source account XR3026-3700493), for the preliminary design of the King-Liberty Pedestrian/Cycling Bridge.

Summary

City Council, at its meeting of November 29, November 30 and December 1, 2011, approved the Environmental Study Report (ESR) for the King-Liberty Pedestrian/Cycling Link which would connect the King Street West area, to the west of Strachan Avenue, across the Metrolinx Georgetown/Milton rail corridor, to the Liberty Village neighbourhood.  Generally, the ESR recommended a bridge structure, approximately 5 metres in width, connecting the western leg of Douro Street and the western leg of Western Battery Road.   The Ministry of Environment subsequently approved the ESR.

 

City Council, in approving the ESR, directed that the design of the bridge be funded from Section 37 contributions or any other appropriate third party funding, with a zero net impact to the City, and be undertaken as soon as these funds become available.  The Section 37 funds required for this design assignment, in the amount of $500,000, have been received by the City from the development at 1030 King Street West as part of a $1 million contribution for community benefits.  This Motion identifies the source account for these funds that are required for this purpose and recommends a corresponding increase in the Transportation Services Capital Budget so that a Request for Proposals (RFP) can be issued to undertake the preliminary design.

 

The preliminary and subsequent detailed design must be completed so that implementation of the bridge can be scheduled as soon as Metrolinx completes the grade separation of the rail corridor at Strachan Avenue in 2014.  In order to meet these timelines, staff are proposing to issue the RFP and award the design assignment in the next few months.  Completion of the design and the associated cost estimate will also enable the City to pursue third party funding for the implementation of the bridge, as directed by City Council, in a timely manner.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.7)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60090.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60329.pdf

MM37.8 - Completing Construction on the Ship Channel Bridge - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Manager take the necessary measures to expedite the completion of construction taking place on the Ship Channel Bridge, and if necessary take any steps required to cover the construction costs and develop a recovery agreement with the Toronto Port Authority.

Summary

The ongoing closure of the Ship Channel Bridge on Cherry Street, compounded with construction related to the Leslie Street connecting track, is causing a significant traffic issue in the Port Lands.  The Ship Channel Bridge closure leaves only one single-lane bridge on Unwin Avenue as the access point for an area housing numerous summer camps, marinas, sailing clubs, and parks.

 

The delay in completion of the Ship Channel Bridge is expected to keep the bridge closed until late July and at that stage only one lane is due to re-open.  This is an unacceptable situation for the surrounding community.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.8)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60129.pdf

MM37.9 - Request for staff report on how to deal with numerous and/or vexatious complaints from one individual - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Doug Ford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Doug Ford, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards to report to the October 29, 2013 Licensing and Standards Committee meeting on a policy directing how City staff can deal with multiple complaints from one person, complaints that appear to be vexatious, and complaints from feuding neighbours, etc.

 

2.         City Council waive any appeal fees charged to property owners that might result from the 59 or more complaints filed by one individual in Ward 38 Scarborough Centre.

Summary

One individual in Scarborough Centre has recently submitted over 58 complaints for various alleged infractions against neighbours living in one subdivision in Scarborough.

 

Local residents witnessed an individual walking around the neighbourhood with a clip board and a measuring tape, apparently examining their properties. These neighbours are now shocked that the hedges, gardens, driveways and properties that have had zero complaints for decades have now received notices of violation for what appear to be trivial and/or vexatious complaints. Residents have also learned that to ask Community Council for an exemption for any of these very minor infractions they must pay a $200 appeal fee.

 

It is unreasonable to ask 58 residents to pay $200 each to respond to a vexatious complaint lodged by a single individual.

 

The City of Kitchener has a policy relating to by-law enforcement that provides direction to City staff on how to deal with vexatious complaints such as when responding to multiple complaints received from a single individual or in situations where by-law enforcement is involved in a dispute between two or more people.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.9)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60130.pdf

MM37.10 - The Eradication of Contraband Tobacco in the City of Toronto - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Raymond Cho

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Raymond Cho, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council write a letter to the Ontario Minister of Finance in support of the Ontario Government’s 2012 and 2013 Budget commitments to eradicate contraband tobacco through the implementation of additional regulatory, enforcement and other provisions through amendments to the Tobacco Tax Act; particularly, in support of the following proposed measures:

 

            a.         increased fines for those convicted of offenses related to contraband tobacco;

 

            b.         more authority for law enforcement officials with respect to: forfeiture of items seized, and impounding of vehicles;

 

            c.         drawing on the best practices of other jurisdictions and working collaboratively with the federal government and other jurisdictions to enhance contraband tobacco control through joint enforcement efforts; and

 

            d.         strengthening provisions to improve the Tobacco Tax Act in meeting the government’s commitments.

 

2.         City Council encourage the Provincial Government to continue to strengthen its strategies to address the manufacture and supply of contraband tobacco and maintain its commitment to introduce amendments this fall to implement these measures.

Summary

Contraband tobacco has negative public consequences and impacts such as unrestricted youth access to tobacco products and an increase in criminal activity.

 

Contraband tobacco products are easily accessible in our community and small businesses are sometimes forced to close because of the sale of contraband tobacco.

 

Small business in our community and government in general stand to benefit from the institution of tougher restrictions on contraband tobacco.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.10)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60132.pdf
Tobacco Tax Strategy (from 2013 Ontario Budget) and Tobacco Enforcement (from 2012 Ontario Budget)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60133.pdf
Contraband Tobacco - The Facts (Toronto)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60134.pdf
List of Ontario Municipalities that have passed motions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60216.pdf

MM37.11 - Bringing Common Sense to Parking Enforcement - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on:

 

a.         existing policies in place to prioritize City of Toronto resources with respect to the activities of Parking Enforcement staff; and

 

b.         developing a policy to prioritize the use of Parking Enforcement to emphasize the important City goals including keeping traffic moving, encouraging paid-parking turnover in high-demand areas, and responding to complaints while reallocating resources from low-demand priorities such as residential streets with abundant unoccupied parking spaces at midday.

Summary

Illegal parking is a serious problem in Toronto.  Some infractions, however, do not warrant the same level of police enforcement as others.  For instance, a car parked too long on some residential streets can impose problems for residents and merits strict enforcement.  However, on other quiet streets where there are several surplus spots, this is less of a problem than an illegally parked car or stopped delivery vehicle on an arterial road.  Vehicles illegally parked or stopped on arterial curb lanes can delay thousands of drivers and transit riders.  There needs to be more common sense applied to parking enforcement in the City of Toronto.

 

There is a clear public interest in keeping traffic moving.  Parking Enforcement should be supporting this and other priorities for the City of Toronto.  To be sure that we are using City resources effectively, this Motion requests a formal policy to support important City priorities such as relieving traffic congestion through parking enforcement.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.11)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60136.pdf

MM37.12 - Further Amendments to the Municipal Elections Act - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing to amend section 41 of the Municipal Elections Act, (ballot provisions) to allow for:

 

             a.        candidate names to be placed in random order, rather than alphabetical order, to ensure fairness for all candidates; and

 

             b.         candidate photographs to be included on ballots to assist voters whose home language is not English.

 

2.         City Council request the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing to amend the Municipal Elections Act to provide the following changes to the election financing rules:

 

             a.         shorten the financial filing deadline from the last Friday in March following the election to 30 days after the end of the campaign period, (section 77); and

 

             b.         require candidates to disclose in their financial filing details about in-kind support given to them by all formal or informal organizations (section 66).

Summary

The City of Toronto is moving forward with election reform in its adoption of a request that the Province of Ontario grant approval to explore alternative electoral systems such as ranked voting.  This Motion proposes further amendments to the Municipal Elections Act which will provide for greater transparency, fairness and inclusiveness.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.12)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60137.pdf

MM37.13 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 30 Ordnance Street - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailăo

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

 Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board for 30 Ordnance Street, together with Planning Staff, to ensure that Planning Staff's recommendations with respect to the original variances sought for 30 Ordnance Street, as well as the Section 45(9) contribution for $100,000 are secured in any OMB decision, and to oppose the three new variances being requested for 30 Ordnance Street.

Summary

In 2012, City Council enacted Site Specific Zoning By-Law 159-2012 to allow for the development of two residential towers at 30 Ordnance Street with underground parking and non-residential gross floor area for certain commercial and office uses. The Final Report related to the zoning by-law amendment anticipated that the proposal might require variances for additional height or density as the project developed.

 

As anticipated, the applicant has come forward with an application to increase the height and density of the two towers. "Building A" would increase from 32 to 35 storeys and "Building B" would go from 27 to 29 storeys. The variances requested relate to maximum permitted gross floor area (GFA), the use of residential amenity space and height.

 

On Thursday, May 22, 2013 the Toronto East York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment held its hearing into this matter. Amongst the items before the panel were two reports from the City's Planning Staff. Planning Staff was generally supportive of the application but requested certain modifications to the variances sought as well as certain conditions. The Committee of Adjustment refused the minor variances outright. The applicant has appealed that decision to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and a hearing has been scheduled for August 27, 2013.

 

It is recommended that the City Solicitor and Planning Staff attend at the OMB hearing into this matter to ensure that planning staff's concerns with respect to the variances are addressed. In particular, Planning Staff recommended a cap on the maximum permitted residential GFA and the combined residential and non-residential GFA as well as the possibility for increased GFA to be used only for additional amenity space (over and above what is already being provided). In addition, Planning Staff recommended that the variances be subject to a financial contribution pursuant to Section 45(9) of the Planning Act for $100,000, to be allocated toward the cost associated with the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge, and/or improvements to parks in the area.

 

Further, the applicant has recently advised Planning Staff that in addition to the variances sought at the Committee of Adjustment, they intend to seek three new variances at the OMB hearing. The first new variance would allow for the construction of a pedestrian walkway between the two towers, which Planning Staff opposes because it will negatively impact the view corridor looking eastward along Ordnance Street into the downtown core. The second new variance would allow parking for the site to be located within 300m from the subject site and proposes a different ratio of parking for an unlimited number of car share spots. Planning is of the view that parking should be provided on site and that any changes to the parking ratio should be further reviewed by Transportation Planning Staff. The third new variance would allow all of the indoor amenity space for both towers to be built in either tower. Planning staff does not support this variance as the buildings will be phased. Each building should contain appropriate residential amenity space as required by the site specific zoning. 

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as Member Motion MM37.13)

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM37.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60217.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 30 Ordnance Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60103.pdf

MM37.14 - Objection to Liquor Licence - 1181 Dundas Street West - Get Well Bar - Licence No. 800225 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailăo

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 1181 Dundas Street West, operating under the name Get Well Bar (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

Summary

2315422 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for the premises at 1181 Dundas Street West, operating under the name Get Well Bar (“Premises”). The application is for additional capacity from 125 to 172 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. Concerns have been raised by residents with respect to the increase in the capacity of the Premises as well as noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. The Registrar of the AGCO should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.  

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this council meeting.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as Member Motion MM37.14)

 

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60218.pdf

MM37.15 - Objection to Liquor Licence - 922 Queen Street West - Carmen Cocina Espanola - Licence No. 809645 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailăo

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 922 Queen Street West, operating under the name Carmen Cocina Espanola (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

Summary

Carmen Says Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for the premises at 922 Queen Street West, operating under the name Carmen Cocina Espanola (“Premises”). The application is for a licensed rear yard outdoor patio with a capacity of 30 persons

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. Concerns have been raised by residents with respect to the impact of the outdoor patio on surrounding dwellings as well as noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. The Registrar of the AGCO should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application. 

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.15 )

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60219.pdf

MM37.16 - Protecting the Great Lakes from Invasive Species: Asian Carp - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
Communications MM37.16.1 to MM37.16.4 have been submitted on this Item

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council write a letter to the Federal and Provincial Ministers of the Environment strongly urging all parties to work in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to identify a preferred solution to the invasive carp issue and move forward to implement that solution with the greatest sense of urgency.

Summary

The Great Lakes and the St. Lawrence River represent the largest body of surface fresh water in the world and are a vibrant, diverse ecosystem that is critically important to the economic well-being and quality of life of the Canadian and U.S. populations in the region.

 

Over 180 invasive species have entered the Great Lakes and its connecting waterways over the years and caused widespread damage and disruption to the natural balance of the system, as well as significant economic damage.  One of the most serious threats ever presented by invasive species currently comes from Asian carp, including silver, bighead, and black varieties. These varieties of carp were introduced to the southern United States for use in fish farms for algae control in the 1970’s and escaped into the Mississippi River system.

 

Invasive species have already inflicted hundreds of millions in damage across the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence, and invasive carp pose a serious threat to the $7 billion sport and commercial fishery that support the economy and help define the culture of the entire region. Invasive carp in the Mississippi River system pose one of the greatest threats to the integrity and well-being of the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence ecosystem, including the 40 million Canadians and Americans who live there.

 

The invasive carp have migrated northward through the Mississippi River system as far north as Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Indiana, and Ohio, reducing significantly or eliminating populations of the more desirable species of fish because of their voracious food consumption and prolific reproduction. These carp are threatening to enter the Great Lakes at a number of points across the region.

 

Once an invasive species establishes itself in an ecosystem, it is exceedingly difficult, if not impossible, to eradicate it, and it often inflicts serious damage on the ecosystem and imposes major costs in efforts to control it; Asian carp pose a dangerous risk of injury to recreational users on waters infested with Asian carp.

 

In Toronto, invasive species have taken a toll on our waterways, our parks and properties. The City of Toronto has spent millions trying to manage invasive species once they establish themselves in our city, including the Emerald Ash Borer and zebra mussels.

 

Canadian and U.S. citizens across the basin have expressed serious concern about the invasive carp and other invasive species, and are demanding prompt action.  Many federal, state, provincial, and local government agencies in the United States and Canada have worked diligently and expended tens of millions of dollars over the past 10 years on a variety of projects to keep invasive carp out of the Great Lakes, but immediate and coordinated action is needed.  Twenty nine municipalities across the US and Canada have demanded stronger action by all levels of governments to fight the invasive species Asian carp.

 

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is conducting a multi year, comprehensive study across the U.S. side of the Great Lakes basin called the “Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin Study” (GLMRIS) that examines 19 separate locations where invasive carp could cross from the Mississippi River Basin to the Great Lakes Basin, and considers a large number of potential ways to stop the further migration.

 

Preventing the invasive carp from entering the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence ecosystem needs to be approached with the greatest sense of urgency by all those responsible for dealing with this matter.  Physical separation is the most effective way to keep invasive carp from entering Lake Michigan through the Chicago Area Waterway System, and such barriers would also prevent the movement of many other invasive species from one basin to the other.  The physical separation is feasible and can be done in a way that maintains or enhances water quality, flood control, and transportation in the system.  Additional steps must be taken in the interim to keep invasive carp out while the long term solution is put in place.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as Member Motion MM37.16)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60220.pdf

Communications

(July 10, 2013) Letter from Dr. Terry Quinney, Provincial Manager, Fish and Wildlife Services, Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters (MM.Supp.MM37.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-39105.pdf
(July 12, 2013) Letter from Dr. Mark Gloutney, Director of Regional Operations - Eastern Region, Ducks Unlimited Canada (MM.Supp.MM37.16.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-39106.pdf
(July 12, 2013) E-mail from Terry Rees, Executive Director, Federation of Ontario Cottagers' Association (MM.Supp.MM37.16.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-39097.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Letter from Bob Kortright, Past President, Toronto Field Naturalists (MM.New.MM37.16.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-39184.pdf

MM37.17 - 48 Oriole Gardens - Appeal to Ontario Municipal Board of Committee of Adjustment's Refusal Decision - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor John Parker

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to support the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the consent and variances regarding 48 Oriole Gardens at a hearing date yet to be determined and, if necessary, to retain outside planning consultants to support the City's position at the hearing.

Summary

An application for a severance and minor variances with respect to the property known as 48 Oriole Gardens was heard by the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment on May 22, 2013 proposing to demolish the existing dwelling, severe the property and construct two new semi-detached dwellings.

 

On May 22, 2013, the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment refused both the severance the variance applications.

 

The Ontario Municipal Board will be considering an appeal to this decision by the Committee of Adjustment at a hearing date yet to be determined.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.17)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60209.pdf
(May 21, 2013) Memorandum from Councillor Josh Matlow - Ward 22 - St. Paul's
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60210.pdf
Report (May 14, 2013) from Chair and Committee members of the Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60211.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision - Consent for 48 Oriole Gardens
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60213.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 48 Oriole Gardens Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60214.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 48 Oriole Gardens Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60215.pdf

MM37.18 - Graffiti Implements - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services and the City Solicitor, to review Municipal Code Chapter 485, Graffiti and report to the Licensing and Standards Committee on the City's ability to:

 

             a.        prohibit the sale, exchange, giving, loaning, or in any other manner, furnishing or causing to be sold, exchanged, given, loaned, or furnished, any Graffiti Implement to a Minor, unless the Minor is accompanied by their parent or legal guardian (this section shall not apply to the parents or legal guardians, the employer, or the school teacher, of the Minor); and

 

             b.        ensure that every business selling Graffiti Implements place a sign in the direct view of persons responsible for accepting customer payment stating: "Selling spray paint, broad tipped marker pens, paint pens, glass cutting tools or glass etching tools or instruments to persons under 18 years of age without parental/legal guardian accompaniment is an offence. Violators may be fined."

Summary

The issue of graffiti continues to be a pressing one within the City of Toronto with respect to both public and private property owners. The successful prosecution of those responsible for graffiti under the Criminal Code of Canada is severely restricted due to a number of factors including the low rate of apprehending perpetrators, the cost and time commitment involved in pursuing these offences through the courts and the lack of assigning a Criminal Code offence (i.e. criminal record) to offenders, particularly those under the age of 18. The onus is usually upon property owners to remove graffiti and to bear the costs of this in spite of existing legislation (ex:  the Ontario Parental Responsibility Act, 2000) that should prima facie provide recourse to victims, but in practice does not.  In view of these realities, municipalities across the Province are adopting innovative approaches to confront the growing issue of graffiti vandalism including efforts to prevent those under the age of 18 (statistically the highest age for graffiti vandalism is those aged 12-18 years) from accessing materials used for graffiti vandalism.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.18)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60146.pdf

MM37.19 - Request for staff report on driveway widening policies for large lots in Scarborough - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
35 - Scarborough Southwest, 36 - Scarborough Southwest, 37 - Scarborough Centre, 38 - Scarborough Centre, 39 - Scarborough-Agincourt, 40 - Scarborough Agincourt, 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 43 - Scarborough East, 44 - Scarborough East
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, City Building, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to the October 22, 2013 Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting on the feasibility of allowing owners of large lots (lots greater than 50 feet wide) permission to widen driveways beyond the current standard allowed in the current by-law similar to the by-law already in place in North York. 

Summary

The current Scarborough parking by-law restricts all properties with a single car garage to a driveway width of a maximum 3 metres, regardless of lot size.

 

Over the last five decades numerous Scarborough property owners of large 80 and 100 foot lots have widened their driveways to a width greater than 3 metres and have had no complaints or issues for several decades. Some families have widened their driveways slightly larger than three metres in order to allow seniors and/or people with walkers to more comfortably exit their car or van and walk up the driveway to their homes while others have made their driveways slightly larger so that two cars can park side by side.

 

While the North York driveway by-law has provisions to recognize that larger lots can have larger width driveways, the Scarborough by-law has no such provision.

 

Large lot owners in Scarborough who want a similar allowance that is permitted in North York must pay a $1,400 Committee of Adjustment fee simply to widen their driveways by one or two metres or to recognize a slight driveway widening that has existed for decades. There is no guarantee that the Committee of Adjustment will say yes to any application, meaning residents might spend $1,400 and be turned down by the Committee of Adjustment.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.19)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60147.pdf

MM37.20 - Request for Appeal of and Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 212 Queens Avenue - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends:

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal Committee of Adjustment Decisions B48/08EYK, A396/08EYK and A397/08EYK for 212 Queens Avenue.

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in opposition to the Committee of Adjustment Decisions to approve the consent and minor variances (B48/08EYK, A396/08EYK and A397/08EYK) for 212 Queens Avenue, and to retain an independent land use planner if necessary. 

Summary

The owners of the land municipally known as 212 Queens Avenue applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain a consent (Application B48/08EYK) and a number of associated minor variances (Applications A396/08EYK and A397/08EYK) in order to build two new detached dwellings.

 

On June 20, 2013, the Committee approved the consent and minor variances.

 

There are concerns that the variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, and that the proposed lot frontages and areas are out of keeping with the existing physical character of the surrounding neighbourhood.

 

(Submitted to Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as Member Motion MM37.20)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60223.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision - Consent for 212 Queens Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60104.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 212 Queens Avenue - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60166.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 212 Queens Avenue - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60105.pdf

MM37.21 - Revised Writ Periods for Toronto Municipal Elections - Request to Province to Amend the Ontario Municipal Elections Act - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Ontario Municipal Elections Act to reduce the writ period for Toronto municipal elections so that Mayoralty candidates may not commence campaign activities until May 1st of each election year and Council candidates may not commence campaign activities until June 1st of each election year.

Summary

The Ontario Municipal Elections Act establishes the regulations under which candidates for municipal office must operate during the election campaign.  One major component of the regulatory process governs the period during which municipal candidates may campaign (the "writ period").  Currently, the Ontario Municipal Elections Act designates January 2nd as the commencement date of the writ period for Toronto municipal election candidates subsequent to their registration for the position for which they are seeking election.  The effective result of this regulation is that municipal candidates are conducting their campaigns from January 2nd through to Election Day in late October each election year (October 27th in 2014).  Therefore, incumbent Mayoralty and Council candidates seeking re-election to office are in reality often diverted from ongoing Council business since the writ periods extend for ten months from January to Election Day in late October each election year.  In addition, there is a transition period lasting from the date of the election to December 1st.  Given that December hosts Christian and Jewish holidays, and New Year's festivities, the reality is that the real work of City business does not commence until early January the following year.  This is not beneficial to the City’s business and such an extensive writ period is not necessary nor in the best interests of the City and its residents.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.21)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60148.pdf

MM37.22 - Reinvestment of Federal Funding to Federally Administered Co-operative Housing - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailăo

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council urge the Federal Government to reinvest savings from expiring co-operative housing agreements back into social housing capital repairs and into maintaining rent-geared-to-income housing.

 

2.         City Council work in partnership with the Co-operative Housing Federation of Toronto, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and other stakeholders to advocate to the Federal Government to direct operating funds back into social housing and secure a national housing strategy.

Summary

On October 30, 2012 City Council committed to reducing the City's funding burden for social housing with the adoption of the Special Housing Working Group's report Putting People First, Transforming Toronto Community Housing. On June 24, 2013, the City of Toronto and Toronto Community Housing launched Close the Housing Gap, a two-year advocacy campaign to persuade the federal and provincial governments to accept responsibility for funding social housing.

 

The Federal Government currently invests $1.7 billion nationally in social housing to support some 605,000 households. Without the reinvestment of funding federal funding support for existing social housing federal funding will decrease to zero by 2031.

 

As the mortgages are paid out, operating agreements expire and federal funding for social housing stops. While housing providers will not be paying down a mortgage after the operating agreement ends, they will require funds for investment in the repair of aging buildings and subsidies to provide affordable housing for low income tenants.

 

Along with Toronto Community Housing and other non-profit housing providers, federally-administered co-operative housing is already being impacted by the withdrawal of federal funds.

 

Federally-administered co-operative housing contributes significantly to the amount of rent-geared-to-income housing in Toronto. By 2030, the withdrawal of federal funding will result in a loss of 2,176 subsidized units for low-income tenants in 82 housing co-operatives across Toronto. Another 7,571 households will be placed at risk due to the loss of funding for repairs and maintenance on their homes.

 

A federal-provincial-territorial social housing working group is currently reviewing the funding impact of the expiration of federal operating agreements.  It is therefore timely and urgent that Toronto City Council add its voice to the campaign urging the Federal Government to reinvest funding into social housing, including federally administered co-operative housing.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.22)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60149.pdf

MM37.23 - To Amend the Terms of Transfer to Build Toronto of 1978 Lake Shore Boulevard West and a Portion of 2000 Lake Shore Boulevard West - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Recommendation 9 and Appendix 9 of Item GM3.21 adopted by Council on May 17, 18 and 19, 2011 to provide that only a stratified portion of 1978 Lake Shore Boulevard West and part of 2000 Lake Shore Boulevard West, limited to 65 metres above-grade, be transferred to Build Toronto.

Summary

By its adoption of GM3.21 entitled “Transfer of Properties to Build Toronto and Declaration of Surplus – Second Quarter 2011”, on May 17, 18 and 19, 2011, Council, among other things, approved the terms of transfer of 1978 Lake Shore Boulevard West and part of 2000 Lake Shore Boulevard West to Build Toronto.  This Motion is an amendment to the terms of transfer so that only a stratified portion of the property limited to 65 metres above-grade is transferred to Build Toronto.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.23)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60150.pdf

MM37.24 - 1860 Bayview Avenue - Minor Site Plan Modifications - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to participate in any Ontario Municipal Board hearing as necessary in support of Trinity Kingsett's request to the Ontario Municipal Board to approve the revised site plan drawings listed below in order to facilitate the construction of a commercial development at 1860 Bayview Avenue, subject to the Pre- and Post-Approval Conditions previously approved by the Ontario Municipal Board through its Order of April 10, 2012, and subject to any further modifications as may be agreed between the parties to the below listed drawings, including modifications to the drawings as may be agreed to by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in order to accommodate an additional dedicated taxi parking space at the P1 parking level and directional signage to direct patrons to dedicated parking spaces:

 

           SPA 100 dated July 9, 2013;

           SPA 101 dated July 9, 2013;

           SPA 400 dated July 9 2013;

           SPA 401 dated July 9, 2013; and

           SPL1A dated May 10, 2013 revised July 9, 2013 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to participate in any Ontario Municipal Board hearing as necessary in support of Trinity Kingsett's request to the Ontario Municipal Board to modify the site specific zoning by-law previously approved by the Ontario Municipal Board through its Order of April 10, 2012 (City of Toronto Zoning By-law 620-2012) in order to reflect the changes to the site plan illustrated in the revised site plan drawings listed in Recommendation 1 above.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take all necessary action to give effect to these recommendations.

Summary

In the fall of 2010, Starbank Developments 1860 Corp. made rezoning and site plan approval applications to the City in respect of its property at 1860 Bayview Avenue in order to permit a two-storey retail commercial building with a two-level below grade parking garage. Those applications were appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board ("OMB" or "Board") in February, 2011. Negotiations between the City, interested area residents, and the applicant ensued. Ultimately a settlement was reached and the parties participated in a settlement hearing in October of 2011. In a written decision issued on November 18, 2011, the Board allowed the zoning appeal and approved the zoning by-law amendment proposed. The site plan application was also approved, but the Board's Order on the site plan approval was withheld until a site plan agreement had been executed and all pre-approval conditions had been satisfied. On April 10, 2012, the OMB issued a further decision endorsing revised site plans, as well as pre-approval and post-approval conditions that had been agreed to between the parties. The final Order on the site plan approval was once again withheld pending written confirmation from the City that a site plan agreement between the City and the applicant/appellant had been executed and all pre-approval conditions had been fulfilled to the City's satisfaction.

 

Subsequent to the Board decisions approving the zoning and site plan in principle, the property was sold to a new owner, Trinity Kingsett Bayview Inc. ("Trinity"). Trinity has worked with prospective tenants of the commercial building, as well as with interested area residents and the local Councillor's office and is proposing revisions to the site plan and resulting changes to the zoning by-law that were approved by the Board. The modifications proposed are modest in nature and largely result from shifting the building envelope to the north by 1 metre and filling in the building mass in two locations, as outlined in the memorandum dated June 19, 2013 attached.

 

As this matter is presently before the Board, the final Order not having issued, it would be appropriate to ask the Board to approve the modified site plans, and to modify its Order in respect of the zoning to reflect the changes to the site plan.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as Member Motion MM37.24)

 

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60221.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Letter from Steve Zakem, Aird & Berlis LLP regarding 1860 Bayview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60222.pdf

MM37.25 - Request for staff report on plan to stop illegal dumping of Toronto fill - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with appropriate staff, to report to the October 22, 2013 Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting on the appropriate mechanism in which to incorporate a mandatory Material Management Plan requirement, as part of any major excavation or development / building permit approval so as to mitigate illegal dumping of materials from Toronto development projects within other GTA municipalities and to ensure excess fill materials are managed in a sustainable and legislatively accountable manner.

 

2.         City Council request that the report contain an examination of available guidelines, including:

 

             a.        The material management guidelines from CLAIRE (Contaminated Land: Applications in Real Environments) at http://www.claire.co.uk

 

             b.        “Best Management Practices for Handling Excess Soils in Ontario” by The Residential and Civil Construction Alliance of Ontario, November 2012.

 

             c.        The draft Ministry of the Environment guidelines “Soil Management – A Guide for Best Management Practices”, and available comments.

 

             and a review of the process in other jurisdictions such as:

 

             d.        The Soil Management Plan of the New Jersey – New York Gas Pipeline Expansion Project (http://www.yesgaspipeline.org).

 

             e.        Soil Risk Management Plan by Geomatrix for Terminal One Site in Richmond California (http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/DocumentCenter/Home/View/8360).

 

Summary

The City of Toronto produces significant quantities of excess fill through brownfield redevelopment, transit construction projects, condo and office tower construction and infrastructure projects.

 

There is documented evidence that excess fill originating in Toronto is being deposited in greenfield sites within and adjacent to the GTA. Some fill has been found to contain unacceptable levels of contaminants when tested at the receiving site.

 

The attached National Post article entitled, “Why can't they find a home for the soil? Contractors agree Toronto's dirt policy is a mess” (National Post, June 29, 2013, Peter Kuitenbrouwer) highlights that jurisdictions such as the Netherlands and Quebec consider excess fill as an asset.  The Netherlands uses excess fill to create “soil banks” which both protect the environment from illegal dumping and also generate a revenue stream for local municipalities.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.25)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60151.pdf
(June 28, 2013) National Post article by Peter Kuitenbrouwer referred to in MM37.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60224.pdf

MM37.26 - Nomination for the Lieutenant Governor's Ontario Heritage Award for Lifetime Achievement - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council nominate Rollo Myers for the Lieutenant Governor's Ontario Heritage Award for Lifetime Achievement and advise the Ontario Heritage Trust of this decision.

Summary

The Ontario Heritage Trust's Heritage Community Recognition Program, recognizes individuals who have made volunteer contributions to preserving, protecting and promoting community heritage over a period of 25 years or more through the Lieutenant Governor's Ontario Heritage Award for Lifetime Achievement. A motion of support by a municipality is a requirement of the nomination process.

 

Rollo Myers is recommended for nomination for a Lieutenant Governor’s Ontario Heritage Award for Lifetime Achievement.

 

As a volunteer for more than 25 years, Mr. Myers has provided critical leadership and made significant contributions towards the conservation of heritage resources within his community and the province. Mr. Myers lived in the Toronto neighbourhood of Cabbagetown from 1970 to 2010. He restored three historic houses in his community and was recognized for this work with an Award of Merit from the former Toronto Historical Board. He was awarded the Jane Jacob's Prize in 2000 for his efforts to restore the site of the Upper Canada's First Parliament Buildings to public ownership.

 

Mr. Myers was appointed by Toronto City Council to The War of 1812 Commemoration Committee, to the Task Force to Bring Back the Don in 1992 and to the former Toronto Historical Board in 1985. He is a founding member of the Citizens for the Old Town (1995), the Friends of Fort York (1994), and the West Don Lands Committee (1992). He served as the Heritage Canada Foundation's Governor for Ontario for six years (2004-2010) representing the Province with distinction.

 

He was awarded the Arts & Letters Club Award in 2002 for heritage advocacy and became a honourary member of the Ontario Association of Architects in 2011. In 2012, he was awarded the Queen Elizabeth II Diamond Jubilee Medal for his community service.

 

Mr. Myers exemplifies the role of a community volunteer and advocate. His engaging and persuasive manner has generated support for many important heritage initiatives. His continuing commitment to the telling of our stories and the preservation of our built and natural environment has contributed greatly to our understanding and conservation of numerous important heritage sites in Toronto and across Ontario.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.26)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60170.pdf

MM37.27 - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events - By Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the recommendations as outlined in the attached report (July 9, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer.

Summary

The Economic Development and Culture Division has received an application from Right to Play International/Influence Marketing, the Organizer of the August 10, 2013 "Scion City Chase" event and from Canadian Auto Workers, the Organizers of the September 1, 2013 "Labour Day Parade Concert" requesting to operate a beer/wine garden at their events to be held on Nathan Phillips Square.

 

Municipal Code Chapter 237 “Nathan Phillips Square "prohibits the sale of alcohol on Nathan Phillips Square” without the approval of Council.

 

City Council approval is required before the next regular City Council cycle.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as Member Motion MM37.27)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60169.pdf
(July 9, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60173.pdf

MM37.28 - Temporary Delegation to the Chief Planner - Authority During the Summer Recess to Direct Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearings - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council delegate to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, during the period of time from the completion of City Council's meeting commencing July 16, 2013 to the commencement of City Council's October 8, 2013 meeting, the authority to direct City staff to attend at Ontario Municipal Board Hearings on appeals of Committee of Adjustment decisions where City Planning staff have made written submissions to the Committee of Adjustment on the application.  The delegation shall include the authority to direct the City Solicitor to appeal a Committee of Adjustment decision on behalf of the City where City Planning staff have  commented  in writing on the application and the authority to direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Hearing.

 

2.          City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to submit a status report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the use of the delegated authority during the summer recess.

Summary

At the conclusion of the City Council meeting scheduled for July 16 and 17, 2013, City Council will be recessing until its meeting of October 8 and 9, 2013.  During that period it is likely that there will be decisions arising from applications to the Committee of Adjustment which will be matters of concern to the City and would warrant the City's attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board either on an appeal by the City itself or on the applicant's appeal to the Board.

 

The purpose of this Motion is to delegate temporary authority during the summer recess to the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning to instruct the City Solicitor, and appropriate City staff, to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board where City Planning staff has written to the Committee of Adjustment on the application.  This would include the authority to direct the City Solicitor to file an appeal of a decision.  The discretion to send appropriate City staff to the OMB will be that of the Chief Planner.  As City staff would be available to provide evidence at the Hearing, there will be no financial implications to this delegated authority.  The City's position at the Hearing would be consistent with City Planning staff's written comments to the Committee of Adjustment.

 

This is an urgent matter as this is the last opportunity to delegate authority to the Chief Planner prior to the summer recess.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.28)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60171.pdf

MM37.29 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds for the Market Street Streetscape Improvement Project to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Business Improvement Area - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2013 Transportation Services Capital Budget by $440,307.59 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 funds received in the development of the lands now known as 22, 26, 38 and 42 The Esplanade and 1 and 5 Scott Street (formerly 40 The Esplanade) (source account XR3026-3700067) for local streetscape enhancement projects, in particular the Market Street Streetscape Improvement Project to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood BIA. 

 

2.         City Council direct that the funding of $440,307.59  be forwarded to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood BIA upon signing by the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood BIA  of an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

 

3.         City Council direct that approval of Recommendations 1 above be conditional on the pending implementing zoning amendment by-laws coming into force to reallocate these Section 37 contributions to local parkland creation or improvements and/or local streetscape enhancement projects, including in particular the Market Street Streetscape Improvement Project and the amending Section 37 Agreements being executed.

Summary

Road alterations and a flexible boulevard on Market Street, from Front St. to Esplanade were approved by Council (Item TE12.72).  This initiative  has created Toronto's first 'flexible street' and is being primarily funded by the abutting property owners, Woodcliffe Properties.  Market Street has been designed as a flush street with a variable sidewalk width which can move to accommodate parking in the winter and cafes in the summer. The street is a major hub for visitors and residents as it abuts the historic St. Lawrence Market and its will also be used for various special events.

 

The project was designed to proceed in two phases as the developer needed to proceed quickly due to its contractual obligations to its tenants (on the western portion) while the City, St. Lawrence BIA and the St. Lawrence South Market agreed to proceed with the second phase (eastern portion) as part of the Esplanade reconstruction in Fall 2013 once funding was secured through Section 37 contributions.

 

During construction of the first phase in April 2013, the limit of excavation expanded much further east than originally anticipated due to all of the lateral work to the new manholes, leaving only a 3m strip on the east side to be constructed as part of Phase Two. Waiting until funding was secured for the east side would mean a significant amount of new road bed would be removed and reconstructed.

 

It was determined that significant cost savings to the City could be achieved if work continued with the existing contractor. As Section 37 funding had not been finalized at that point, the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood BIA agreed to advance the funds to complete the project with the understanding that it would be reimbursed at a later point. The BIA entered into a contract with the contractor Clearway Construction Inc. and the work was completed in June 2013.

 

City Staff from Transportation Services reviewed and approved this process. By advancing the timeline for the second phase, costs were reduced from initial estimates of $440,307.59.

 

This Mtion seeks approval to allocate funding from a Section 37 fund to the St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood BIA for the amount that was required to complete the streetscaping project.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.29)

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM37.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60174.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60316.pdf

MM37.30 - Staff Representation to attend an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision for 20 Oxford Street (File AO196/13TEY) - by Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailăo

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the OMB hearing for 20 Oxford Street to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of this application and to retain an outside planning consultant if necessary.

Summary

On May 9, 2013 the Committee of Adjustment refused a minor variance application for 20 Oxford Street (A0196/13TEY).   The proposal was to add a fourth dwelling unit to the basement of a three-story converted house that already contains three dwelling units. To facilitate this proposal, the applicant sought two variances from the Committee of Adjustment 1) an increase of the gross floor area to 1.60 times the area of the lot when the by-law allows a gross floor area of 1.0 times the area of the lot, and 2) permission to provide only two parking spaces on the site when the by-law requires a minimum of four parking spaces to be provided on the site. The applicant has appealed the Committee's refusal and the OMB hearing for this matter has been scheduled for August 6, 2013.

 

The City should attend the OMB hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of these variances because the proposed addition of a fourth dwelling unit on the subject property would be an overdevelopment of the site and will have negative consequences for the surrounding community.

 

My office has received a number of complaints from area residents about the density of use on this property already and increasing the density on this site will exacerbate already existing problems. Neighbouring residents have complained about large overflowing garbage and recycling bins in front of the house as well as noise and rowdy partying by the residents of this address. Having an additional dwelling unit would make these problems worse. Also, by providing only half the required parking spaces, this development will add to an already existing street parking shortage in the area.  

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.30)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60175.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 20 Oxford Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60195.pdf
(May 6, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60198.pdf
(April 26, 2013) Letter from Mark Reid and Stefan Gohlke to the Committee of Adjustment regarding 20 Oxford Street

MM37.31 - Authorization to Release 37 Funds for Capital Improvements to Toronto Arts Council Gallery/Studio Spaces at 120 Fort York Boulevard, 32 Camden Street and Other Locations - by Councillor Adam Vaughan, secondedy by Councillor John Parker

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2013 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $100,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 funds received in the development at 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338, and 340 Adelaide Street West (source account  XR3026-370091) for capital improvements to the Toronto Arts Council gallery/studio space at 120 Fort York Boulevard and other Ward 20 locations, and excluding any improvements to Toronto Arts Council administrative office space.

 

2.         City Council increase the approved 2013 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $250,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 45 funds received in the development at 0 Bremner Boulevard (source account  XR3028-450010) for capital improvements to the Toronto Arts Council gallery/studio space at 120 Fort York Blvd. and other Ward 20 locations, and excluding any improvements to Toronto Arts Council administrative office space.

 

3.         City Council forward the funding of $350,000.00 to the Toronto Arts Council in installments in response to the submission by Toronto Arts Council of detailed plans and cost estimates of the capital improvements for each location and the signing by the Toronto Arts Council of an Undertaking for each location governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.          

 

4.         City Council authorize City Planning and Accounting Services staff to forward the Section 37 funds, to a maximum of $350,000.00 in year 2013, in installments in accordance with Part 3, above.

Summary

The Toronto Arts Council (TAC) has secured gallery/studio space at 120 Fort York Boulevard and/or 32 Camden Street, and Other Locations that will be made available to artists at below market affordable rents.

 

The Toronto Arts Council will be hiring an architect to design the necessary capital improvements to the spaces, which consist of a total of four units ranging from 600 to 1200 square feet each.  TAC staff estimates that the capital upgrades to this space will cost up to approximately $300,000, and they also plan to make other spaces in Ward 20 available to artists in a similar fashion.

 

Section 37 funds in the amount of $100,000 were secured in the development at 328, 330, 332, 334, 336, 338, and 340 Adelaide Street West for capital improvements to arts space in Ward 20. Those funds have been received by the City. The Section 37 agreement acknowledges that the arts space is likely to be site(s) occupied or operated by TAC, but specifies that the capital improvements will not involve improvements to TAC administrative office space.

 

Section 45 funds in the amount of $250,000 were secured in the development at 0 Bremner Boulevard for capital improvements to arts space in Ward 20. Those funds have been received by the City.

 

As detailed plans and cost estimates are submitted to the City for each location, the funds will be forwarded to TAC in installments. An Undertaking signed by TAC will be required for each location/funding installment.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.31)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60178.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60330.pdf

MM37.32 - Liquor Licence - 489 King Street West - Fynn's of Temple Bar - Licence No. 810544 - by Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the application to expand the liquor licence of the outdoor area for Fynn’s of Temple Bar, 489 King Street West (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request that the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Summary

6076416 Canada Inc. has submitted an application for an expansion of a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 489 King Street West operating under the name Fynn’s of Temple Bar (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking to expand the licence capacity of an outdoor private patio from 35 to 84 patrons. The Premises has a liquor licence for the indoor area for a capacity of 187 patrons.

 

The private patio is located in close proximity to residential properties and the application is to more than double the size of the current capacity. Therefore, the application to expand the liquor licence of the outdoor area is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are added to the licence. Under no circumstance should an expansion to the liquor sales licence for the patio be granted at the Premises without appropriate conditions attached.

 

This matter is deemed urgent as the deadline to object to the application is August 3, 2013.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.32)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60182.pdf

MM37.33 - Liquor Licence - 487 Adelaide Street West - Spirit House - Licence No. 814918 - by Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the application to expand the liquor licence to the outdoor area for Spirit House, 487 Adelaide Street West (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request that the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. 

Summary

2266880 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for an expansion of a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 487 Adelaide Street West operating under the name Spirit House (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for a capacity of 47 patrons on an outdoor boulevard patio. Currently, the Premises has a liquor licence for the indoor area for a capacity of 119 patrons. In June, 2011 the City and the applicant entered into a Consent Agreement that placed 12 conditions on the indoor licence.

 

On June 18, 2013, Toronto and East York Community Council deferred consideration of a report from the Acting Director, Licensing Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards, respecting a refusal of a Boulevard Cafe Permit Application at the Premises until its next meeting to be held on September 10, 2013. The applicant requires the permit in order to use the City boulevard as an outdoor patio.

 

The proposed boulevard patio is located in close proximity to residential properties. Therefore, the application to expand the liquor licence to the outdoor area is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are added to the licence. Under no circumstance should a liquor sales licence for the patio be granted at the Premises without appropriate conditions attached. Furthermore, the boulevard patio application is pre-mature at this time until a permit is obtained by the applicant to operate a patio on the City boulevard.

 

This matter is deemed urgent as the deadline to object to the application was May 17, 2013.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as Member Motion MM37.33)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.33
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60184.pdf

MM37.34 - Transfer of 260 Eighth Street and 124 Birmingham Street by a subsidiary of City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation carrying on business as Toronto Port Lands Company - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailăo

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council exempt the property owned by Arrowhead New Toronto East Inc. municipally known as 260 Eighth Street and 124-126 Birmingham Street (the "Property") from Recommendation 17b of Item EX24.1, adopted by City Council on October 29 and 3, 2008, and the Shareholder Direction for City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation carrying on business as Toronto Port Lands Company ("TPLC") be amended to reflect this exemption.

 

2.         City Council consent to the sale of the Property by Arrowhead New Toronto East Inc to a purchaser or purchasers proposed by Build Toronto Inc. on terms and conditions recommended by Build Toronto's Board of Directors and satisfactory to the Board of Directors of the Toronto Port Lands Company.

 

3.         City Council direct that a declaration by the City, in its capacity as sole shareholder of the Toronto Port Lands Company, be delivered to the Board of Directors of the Toronto Port Lands Company, directing that the Toronto Port Lands Company pay the net proceeds from the sale of the Property as a dividend to the City.

 

4.         City Council direct that a portion of the dividend in such amount as the City Manager may determine be paid by the City to Build Toronto.

Summary

By City Council's adoption on October 29 and 30, 2008 of Recommendation 17(b) of Executive Committee Item EX24.1, City Council directed that conditional upon a satisfactory review by the City's Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) of the financial and real estate issues and subject to the execution of an agreement with Build Toronto on terms and conditions satisfactory to the CFO and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, all properties outside the waterfront planning area then owned by City of Toronto Economic Development Corporation (“TEDCO”) and its subsidiaries be transferred to Build Toronto Inc. for nominal consideration, to begin the process of unlocking the value of land holdings of the City.

 

By Staff Report to the Executive Committee dated April 22, 2009, it was confirmed that one of the properties of TEDCO to be transferred to Build Toronto was 260 Eighth Street and 124-126 Birmingham Street (the “Property”) with issues noted as follows: Currently Vacant.  Environmental issues from former industrial occupancy.

 

The Property is registered in the name of a subsidiary corporation of TEDCO, being Arrowhead New Toronto East Inc.

 

Since 2009 Build Toronto has contributed its development, environmental management and marketing expertise on the Property.

 

Build Toronto is in negotiations with a purchaser for a large portion of the Property for the development of a new facility which would retain the employment use of the Property. Under environmental legislation transferring title of contaminated land to Build Toronto may subject it to onerous remediation obligations. It is therefore proposed to transfer the Property directly from the current registered owner to a purchaser or purchasers.

 

The adoption by Council of this Motion would enable Arrowhead to transfer title directly to the purchaser or purchasers proposed by Build Toronto.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as Member MM37.34)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.34
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60187.pdf

MM37.35 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to provide a Table Tennis Table at June Rowlands Park - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the 2013 approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation operating budget by $4,000, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits, obtained in the development of 150 Roehampton Avenue, (source account XR3026-3700023) to provide a concrete table tennis table for use at June Rowlands Park.

Summary

Authority is being sought to increase the 2013 approved Parks, Forestry and Recreation operating budget by $4,000, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits, to provide a concrete table tennis table for use at June Rowlands Park.

 

The $4,000 in Section 37 funds obtained in the development of 150 Roehampton Avenue, (source account XR3026-3700023) were secured through a condition of approval, for "community benefit:  improving community services and facilities in the neighbourhood", and have been received by the City.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.35)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.35
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60190.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60317.pdf

MM37.36 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from 77 Charles Street West for the Supply and Installation of Decorative Pole Wraps on Existing Hydro poles for the Church Wellesley Business Improvement Area - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2013 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $20,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 77 Charles Street West, (source account: XR3026-3700381), for the supply and installation of decorative pole wraps on existing Hydro poles for the Church Wellesley Business Improvement Area.

Summary

The City has a long-standing partnership with the Church Wellesley Business Improvement  Area (BIA).  The BIA is proposing to supply and install decorative pole wraps on existing Hydro poles at an estimated cost of $20,000 as a streetscape improvement for the World Pride Event in 2014.  However, there is currently no funding included in the 2013 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for this project.

 

The supply and installation of decorative pole wraps on existing Hydro poles will enhance the streetscape of the BIA for the World Pride Event in 2014.

 

The funds were secured as part of a $100,000 cash contribution in the development at 77 Charles Street West for the purpose of area streetscape improvements, and have been received by the City.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.36)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.36
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60200.pdf
(July 16, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60331.pdf

MM37.37 - Request to Update Toronto’s Private Tree By-law in Accordance with Provincial Planning Act (2005) and the Federal Migratory Birds Convention Act (2005) and accepted principles of evidence based decision making - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Parks and Environment Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Parks and Environment Committee in the first quarter of 2014 on how to improve the City's tree preservation by-law, such report to include:

 

i.          Integrating evidence-based tree measures (species identification, age, health, and value) for large trees (greater than 30 cm in diameter) to streamline the development and planning process consistent with the policy under Ontario’s Planning Act (Land Use Planning for Natural Heritage);

 

ii          Requiring impartial third party collection, and peer review of evidence during the planning and development process, similar to the standards currently set for environmental assessments of brownfields under Ontario’s Environmental Protection Act, to ensure compliance with provincial and municipal policy; and

 

iii.        Preventing large trees (greater than 30 cm in diameter) from being removed during the nesting season of migratory birds in order to comply with Canada’s Migratory Birds Convention Act.

Summary

The cutting of mature trees in development sites causes public concern.

 

Failure of the developer to provide, nor the City to require, real and readily available evidence on tree species, age and condition could mean that the approved plan may not comply fully with the regulatory policy outlined in Ontario’s Planning Act (Land Use Planning for Natural Heritage). The destruction of migratory bird nests during the breeding season would violate the federal Migratory Birds Convention Act.

 

Evidence-based decision-making is a simple practice whereby decision-makers require quantitative ‘evidence’ (in the form of an analyzed sample), as opposed to qualitative ‘opinion’ (based on visual examination).  This practice has revolutionized many policy-fields over the past few decades, including medicine, and conservation (Sutherland et al 2004).

 

Currently, the City of Toronto requires qualitative opinion in the form of ‘visual examination’ for tree characteristics used to guide urban forest policy (tree species, tree age, and tree health) – whereby, anyone with basic arboriculture training is permitted to estimate these metrics by simply guessing what they are from a cursory ‘visual examination’.

 

The proposed ‘sample evidence’ method simply requires the collection of ‘sample evidence’ so that it may be quantitatively evaluated by an expert third-party review process, and then passed on to decision-makers.  Accordingly, ‘sample evidence’ for the three main tree characteristics would be as follows:

 

1)         Tree Species: requires a ‘leaf sample’

2)         Tree Age: requires a ‘core sample’ (a sample of wood used to count the age)

3)         Tree Health: requires a ‘core sample’ (to use in conjunction with visual examination).

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.37)

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM37.37
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60203.pdf
Article by William J. Sutherland, Andrew S. Pullin, Paul M. Dolman and Teri M. Knight in "TRENDS in Ecology and Evolution" Vol. 19 No. 6 June 2004
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60225.pdf

MM37.38 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 146 Strachan Avenue - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear in support of decisions B0002/13TEY, A0020/13TEY, and A0021/13TEY of the Committee of Adjustment respecting 146 Strachan Avenue and to retain outside consultants as necessary to support the City's position.

Summary

Applications were submitted to the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever lands known municipally as 146 Strachan Avenue (Application No. B0002/13TEY), as well as seeking relief from various provisions of City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 (Application Nos. A0020/13TEY and A0021/13TEY). At a hearing on June 5, 2013 the Committee refused all three applications, finding the requested variances did not meet the intent and purpose of either the Official Plan or Zoning By-Law, and the consent was not demonstrated to be suitable in the context. The owner has now appealed those decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

Application A0020/13TEY requests variances to permit the addition of a second and third storey to the existing house and add a dwelling unit in the basement. These variances include a variance for GFA of 1.8 times coverage whereas 1 times coverage is permitted, reduced setbacks, deficiency in soft landscaping, and provision of 0 parking spaces where 1 is required.

 

The proposed consent would sever the rear portion of the property to create a lot fronting on Massey Street, and variance application A0021/13TEY relates to the construction of a new house in place of an existing detached garage. Requested variances include inclusion of an integrated garage where one is not permitted, reduced side yard setbacks, and GFA of 1.42 times lot area where 1 times coverage is permitted.

 

The consent and variances as a whole do not respect and reinforce the character of the neighbourhood. Accordingly, this Motion seeks to instruct staff to appear in support of the Committee of Adjustment decisions. Planning has recommended the imposition of a condition to address privacy and overlook concerns, but did not write in opposition to the application. As such it is recommended that the City Solicitor be granted authority to retain an outside planning consultant to provide expert evidence before the Board.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.38)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.38
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60204.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 146 Strachan Avenue Parts 1 and 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60206.pdf

MM37.39 - Liquor Licence Application to Remove Condition - 2270121 Ontario Inc. o/a Church Aperitivo Bar, 1090 Queen Street West - Licence Number 814239 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) and the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the City of Toronto objects to the application to remove a condition attached to the liquor licence for Church Aperitivo, 1090 Queen Street West (the “Premises”), as no change of circumstances has occurred at the Premises to warrant its removal, and that the LAT should issue a Proposal to Refuse the application.

 

2.         City Council request the LAT to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter.

Summary

2270121 Ontario Inc. has applied to the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) to remove the following condition from the liquor licence of Church Aperitivo Bar, 1090 Queen Street West (the “Premises”):

 

1.         The Licensee shall ensure that a designated employee is on duty at all times to make the best possible efforts to ensure that patrons and any other people in the areas surrounding any entrance/exit of the establishment, and in any outdoor area of the establishment, are not causing a disturbance that will affect nearby residents, until one hour after the closing of the establishment.

 

The City objects to the removal of the condition from the licence as a change in circumstances that would warrant its removal has not occurred at the Premises. The condition that the Licensee is applying to remove was placed on the licence to limit impacts on area residents that occur from a restaurant/night club use. The Premises intends to continue to operate as a restaurant/nightclub, and the removal of the condition will increase the potential for impacts on the area residents.  A change in circumstance has not occurred to permit the removal of the condition and it is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents to have the condition removed. The Licence Appeal Tribunal should issue a Proposal to Refuse the application.

 

This matter is considered urgent as the deadline for submissions to the LAT to object to the removal of the conditions is July 22, 2013. 

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.39)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.39
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60205.pdf

MM37.40 - Delivering Solutions to Gridlock - Ending Congestion Caused By Rush Hour Deliveries on Busy Streets - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Chin Lee

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Chin Lee, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, as a part of the Courier/Delivery Vehicle Parking Permit report or at such time as is considered, on:

 

a.         strategies to discourage commercial deliveries and truck traffic during peak commuting hours including but not limited to:

 

i.          a pilot program similar to the Manhattan Off-Hour Truck Delivery Program; and

 

ii.          banning delivery trucks from travelling or stopping on congested routes during rush hours or other busy periods;

 

b.         strategies to encourage and enable smaller and/or human powered delivery vehicles where practical; and

 

c.         any opportunities to use the proposed permit parking system for courier and delivery vehicles to implement innovative policies to relieve congestion.

 

2.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on:

 

a.         an update on efforts to increase the provision of laneways parallel to congested routes, providing locations for off-street deliveries; and

 

b.         strategies to further encourage and expedite the provision of new laneways or other off-street spaces for deliveries.

Summary

Traffic congestion is a significant problem for Toronto's motorists, public transit users and cyclists. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) recently noted that the Greater Toronto Area suffers from the longest work commute times in North America. Estimates have put the cost of congestion to our city's economy at $6 billion a year while negatively impacting on the quality of life of our residents.

 

Of course, the long-term solutions to this problem include building a more accessible, extensive and efficient public transportation system in addition to encouraging car-pooling and cycling. But, in the meantime, whether one is a motorist or a surface transit user, it is infuriating to see a large delivery vehicle blocking an entire lane of traffic during rush hour. That one act causes bottlenecks, backing up traffic several blocks on major arterial roads.

 

Toronto's streets must be used more efficiently as we do not have the space or the resources to build more lanes. During the busiest hours of the day, we should prioritize commuters travelling to and from work. There are undeniable benefits to our economy and our quality of life when people spend less time commuting and more time at work or with their family.

 

While commercial deliveries are an economic necessity, we can use creative strategies to reduce the traffic disruption caused by delivery vehicles, while still ensuring that our businesses receive the goods they need. Other cities, for example, have banned commercial traffic from certain congested areas during the day and implemented programs to encourage night deliveries.

 

City of Toronto staff are currently preparing to report on developing a permit parking system for courier and delivery vehicles, previously presented as Item PW11.3. This Motion requests addressing the issue more effectively by considering complementary policies to relieve congestion due to delivery vehicles.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.40)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.40
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60207.pdf

MM37.41 - 6125 Yonge Street - Authority for City Position at Ontario Municipal Board - A0516/10NY - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 6125 Yonge Street scheduled for July 31, 2013, and inform the Ontario Municipal Board that the City does not oppose the appeal, provided that the Board imposes a condition that there be no new or expanded restaurant uses on the property without the approval of further variances.

Summary

An application was submitted to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A0516/10NY) seeking relief from various provisions of North York By-Law 7625.  These variances include a request for lot coverage of 38.44 percent whereas 33 percent is permitted, a rear yard setback of 4.5m whereas 7.5m is required, and variances for deficiencies concerning the number of parking spaces and size of loading area.  The Committee of Adjustment refused the requested minor variances in a decision dated April 10, 2013 after finding that the variances did not meet the intent and purpose of either the Official Plan or Zoning By-law.  The applicant has appealed that decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

City Council decided at its meeting of June 11, 12 and 13, 2013 to send the City Solicitor to attend the scheduled OMB hearing in support of the Committee's decision.  Since that date the applicant has entered into discussions with the local Councillor and City staff, which have led to the resolution of outstanding issues with regard to parking and use of the premises.  Accordingly, it is recommended that the City Solicitor be granted authority to not oppose the appeal, but request that an approval of the appeal be subject to conditions drafted by the City to ensure no new restaurant uses will be permitted on the premises.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.41)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.41
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60233.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 6125 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60234.pdf

MM37.42 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 2 Dilworth Crescent - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Norm Kelly

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Norm Kelly, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the appropriate City staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 2 Dilworth Crescent and oppose a variance for a building height greater than 9.1m.

Summary

The owners of the property known municipally as 2 Dilworth Crescent applied to the Committee of Adjustment (the “Committee”) for three variances, including a height variance of 10.0m when 8.5m is permitted by the zoning by-law.  City Planning staff wrote a report expressing concerns that the height variance was not in keeping with the character of the neighbourhood, and that it did not maintain the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law.

 

After consultation with the Ward Councillor and staff, the applicants revised their application before the Committee to reduce the height to 9.1m.  On May 22, 2013, the Committee refused the application in its entirety.  The applicants have appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

The City has received confirmation that the applicants will not be seeking a height variance above 9.1m.  This Motion seeks authority to oppose any revisions to the application that would seek a height variance greater than 9.1m. The City is not opposed to the two remaining variances.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.42)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.42
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60237.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 2 Dilworth Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60239.pdf
Letter (July 9, 2013) from Sharmini Mahadevan, Wood Bull LLP on behalf of the owner of 2 Dilworth Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60238.pdf

MM37.43 - Fostering Toronto's Music Cluster - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor David Shiner

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. Requires two-thirds vote to consider at this meeting.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor David Shiner, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development Committee, Councillor David Shiner, Vice-Chair, Economic Development Committee and Councillor Gary Crawford, Co-Chair, Toronto Film Board, in conjunction with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to consult broadly with the Toronto Music Industry in regard to the formation of an industry based “Toronto Music Advisory Committee” to assist staff in strengthening this key cluster and to report back to the October 24, 2013 meeting of the Economic Development Committee with recommendations on the structure, mandate, and terms of reference for such a Committee.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to develop a strategic action plan that maximizes the impact of City support for the Toronto Music Industry, including the preferred forms of this support and to ensure the new Advisory Committee is involved in this process.

 

3.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to conduct these initiatives in conjunction with any ongoing review and reorganization of the Economic Development and Culture Division and the 2014 budget approval process.

Summary

At its meeting on February 21, 2012, the Economic Development Committee referred Item ED11.8 http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewagendaitemhistory.do?item=2012.ed11.8 to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, with a request that he, in conjunction with industry stakeholders, develop a series of short, medium, and long-term recommendations for government(s) and the Toronto Music Industry to consider that would position Toronto as a leading live music tourist destination and promote and foster Toronto's music cluster.

 

Since the Committee's request, City Council has endorsed a new economic strategy, “Collaborating for Competitiveness:  Accelerating Economic Growth and Job Creation in Toronto”, and a set of Principles and Priorities for the implementation of “Creative Capital Gains” based on community consultation.  These initiatives include recommendations to strengthen and grow high value sectors and creative industries.  Economic Development and Culture staff have also met with Music Canada, other industry representatives, and Ontario Media Development Corporation (OMDC) staff on a number of occasions.

 

In May 2013, the Ontario Minister of Finance, Charles Sousa, and Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport, Michael Chan, announced the establishment of a 3-year, $45 million Ontario Music Fund to support production, distribution, performance and international promotion of music made in Ontario.  This fund will be administered by OMDC.

 

To further develop and implement specific strategies to position Toronto as a leading live music tourist destination; develop, showcase and expand our local talent base; and identify the most appropriate and effective role for the City of Toronto to promote and strengthen this key sector, an Advisory Committee with representatives from the various elements of the industry, including youth, should be formally established.  The Advisory Committee would assist staff in developing and evaluating options consistent with the recommendations contained in the City's economic and cultural strategies, “Collaborating for Competitiveness:  Accelerating Economic Growth and Job Creation in Toronto” and “Creative Capital Gains”, and provide advice to Council through the Economic Development Committee.

 

This Motion without Notice is an urgent item for City Council to consider at its meeting on July 16 - 17, 2013.  The Motion recommends the establishment of a Toronto Music Advisory Committee and the development of a strategic action plan to strengthen and expand the music industry within the City.  This initiative will stimulate job creation, particularly for youth and should begin immediately.  The current unemployment rate for youth (15 - 24 years) in the City of Toronto is now over 18 percent, more than double the overall unemployment rate of 8.2 percent within the City and almost 50 percent higher than the youth unemployment rate for Canada.

 

In addition to job creation, the music industry attracts tourists from around the world and it contributes to making Toronto a great City to live, work and invest in.

 

City Council and the Economic Development Committee have indicated support for the music industry.  Music Canada congratulated the Mayor and Council for identifying music as a priority for arts funding derived from the billboard tax in the 2013 and future years Capital and Operating budgets. The Provincial government also recently established the Ontario Music Fund and allocated $45 million over 3-years  to support production, distribution, performance and international promotion of music made in Ontario.  It is essential that a strategic action plan for the Toronto music sector be developed as soon as possible to ensure businesses within the City are positioned to access their fair share of this provincial program.
 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.43)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.43
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60232.pdf

MM37.44 - Official Plan Amendment Regarding Section 37 Policies Related to Affordable Housing: Authorization for Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to Report Directly to July, 2013 Council Meeting - by Councillor Peter Milczyn, seconded by Pam McConnell

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

July 18, 2013 10:30 AM - The attachment originally attached to this item has been replaced with the correct version of the report as distributed to Members of City Council.

Bill 1075 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Peter Milczyn, seconded by Councillor Pam McConnell, recommends that: 

 

1.         City Council adopt the attached report (July 8, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Summary

City Planning staff had previously recommended (Item PG22.1) an Official Plan Amendment to permit condominium-registered affordable rental units as a Section 37 benefit, subject to conditions.   At its meeting of April 3 and 4, 2013, City Council referred the Item to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning for a report to the June 2013 Council meeting on the implications of removing two of these conditions, the results of consultation with the Affordable Housing Office and stakeholders, and addressing the creation of a definition of affordable ownership housing.

 

Consultations are ongoing and thus the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning is not yet able to report on these matters.  The requested report will instead be forwarded to the July, 2013 Council meeting.  The recommendation will authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report directly to the July, 2013 meeting of City Council.

 

The matter is urgent because there are applicants who have advised that they may be willing to contribute condominium-registered affordable rented units as a Section 37 community benefit and the Official Plan Amendment is needed to authorize such a benefit.  These opportunities for affordable housing may otherwise be lost.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.44)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.44
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60309.pdf
(July 8, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Official Plan Review - Official Plan Amendment to Adopt New Section 37 Policies Related to Affordable Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60326.pdf

MM37.45 - Investing in Toronto Water Infrastructure - by Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to report to the October 30, 2013 meeting of the Executive Committee with financing options for increased investment in Toronto Water Infrastructure, particularly for Wet Weather Flow Management Master Plan and Basement Flooding projects, as previously directed by Council.

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to undertake any necessary additional consultations with stakeholders and the public on the proposed options in preparation of the report requested in Recommendation 1 above.

Summary

In 2012, Toronto Water's Capital Plan was reduced by $1.132 billion or 14 percent compared to the 2011 – 2020 Approved Capital Plan, in order to replenish the Water Stabilization Reserve and re-establish a sufficient Water Capital Financing Reserve balance by 2014.

 

As a result, the following projects were reduced:

 

1.         Watermain Renewal (Replacement & Rehabilitation) projects to address state of good repair issues were reduced by a total of $185.493 million from 2012 to 2020.

 

2.         Wet Weather Flow Master Plan projects were reduced by a total of $436.578 million from 2012 to 2020.

 

3.         Storage and Pumping Facilities projects were reduced by a total of $370.768 million from 2012 to 2020.

 

4.         Transmission Watermain projects were reduced by a total of $308.474 million from 2012 to 2020.

 

5.         Basement flooding program projects were reduced by a total of $127.306 million from 2012 to 2020.

 

Along with deferring $1.132B in capital projects, Toronto Water has unbudgeted projects with cost pressures of $540 million, bringing the unbudgeted pressures to close to $1.7 billion.  The estimated infrastructure renewal backlog at the end of 2012 was $1.636 billion.

 

There is growing pressure to increase investment to address extreme weather events and climate change adaptation, including the Basement Flooding Protection Program and the Wet Weather Flow Master Plan implementation.  

 

At its meeting of November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, City Council directed the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and General Manager, Toronto Water to report to the Executive Committee on new financing options in June 2012, in advance of Toronto Water's Long Term Capital Plan.

 

 As directed by City Council, Toronto Water staff also undertook consultations with residents and stakeholders in the summer of 2012 to seek input on a range of new financing mechanisms.

 

The options to be considered include:

 

1.         Water Rate increases, beyond the existing plan of 3%, beginning in 2015.

 

2.         Debenture financing for large scale, long service period projects beginning in 2014, with all debt service costs to be paid from water rate revenue.

 

3.         Introducing a fixed charge to provide a dedicated reserve for wet weather flow control projects including basement flooding protection, beginning in 2015.

 

4.         Increasing development charge recoveries which may be realized through the forthcoming update to the 2013 Development Charges Background Study.

 

5.         Opportunities to secure funding from the Federal and Provincial Governments for Lake Ontario water quality improvement projects.

 

City staff reported back to City Council on October 30, 31 and November 1, 2012 on the various options on a possible new financing strategy to support Toronto Water's long term Capital Plan as noted above.  Council directed staff to report back to the Executive Committee in June 2103 in advance of Toronto Water's 2014 Capital Budget submission.  And the preparation of that report has been delayed.

 

In light of the recent storms and the significant impact on our transportation, hydro, transit and public and private infrastructure, I believe it is urgent that City Council consider proposed financing options to increase the multi-year capital plan for Toronto Water prior to the 2014 Capital Budget, as approved by Council.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.45) 

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.45
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60300.pdf

MM37.46 - Request for Representation at Ontario Municipal Board - File A183/13NY - 350 Joicey Boulevard - by Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor John Parker

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 350 Joicey Boulevard, and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at her discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Ward Councillor.

Summary

The owner of the property known municipally as 350 Joicey Boulevard applied to the Committee of Adjustment (the "Committee") for a number of variances, including a variance to allow three storeys where only two storeys are permitted, in order to permit the construction of a new detached dwelling with an integral two-car garage.

 

City Planning staff recommended that the variance permitting three storeys be refused. On April 24, 2013, the Committee approved the application in part, refusing only the variance for three storeys.  The applicant has appealed this refusal to the Ontario Municipal Board, and the matter has been scheduled for July 29, 2013.

 

The three storeys being sought by the applicant are not the traditional three storeys atop each other.  This variance is technical in nature, and only applies to a small portion of the west side of the house comprising a foyer and mud room off of the garage.  Normally, these rooms would fall within an exception providing for access to garages which would not count these rooms as a storey.  Because the foyer contains a door to the outside, this area does not fall within the exception, and falls within the definition of first storey of the house.  The main floor becomes the second storey, and the top floor becomes the third storey.

 

While the City recognizes the technical nature of this variance, there are concerns that a decision permitting a third storey could set a precedent for traditional three-storey developments in the future.  For that reason, this Motion seeks authority for the City Solicitor to negotiate a settlement that would prevent a traditional three storey dwelling from being constructed on the subject property and minimize the precedent that this decision could set.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.46)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.46
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60296.pdf
(April 16, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on 350 Joicey Boulevard File No. 183/13NY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60306.pdf

MM37.47 - Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Files: B004/13NY, A032/13NY and A033/13NY - 1254 Avenue Road - by Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor John Parker

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision for 1254 Avenue Road.

Summary

On April 10, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment refused an application for consent to the division of a parcel of residential lands into three parts for conveyance purposes for the creation of three new residential building lots, and to allow each of the proposed townhouse units to be held in separate ownership.  The Consent application was followed by three (3) Minor Variance/Permission applications for the proposed three unit, three-storey townhouses – Units “A”, “B”, and “C” to be constructed on the subject property.

 

Staff recommended that all four applications be Refused.

 

The Committee of Adjustment unanimously refused all four applications -- the Consent and three (3) Minor Variance Applications.

 

In the opinion of the Committee, the Consent application did not satisfy the requirements of Section 51(24) of the Planning Act and was not approved for the following reason(s):

 

1.         The proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan.

 

2.         The suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided has not been demonstrated.

 

3.         The suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots has not been demonstrated.

 

The Committee did not approve the 3 Minor Variance/Permission applications for Units “A”, “B”, and “C”  for the following reasons:

 

1.         The general intent and purpose of the Official Plan is not maintained.

 

2.         The general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law is not maintained.

 

3.         The variance(s) is not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land.

 

4.         In the opinion of the Committee, the variance(s) is not minor.

 

On April 30, 2013, the Applicant appealed the Committee decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.  A hearing has not been scheduled as yet.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.47) 

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.47
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60298.pdf
(February 19, 2013) Memorandum from Manager, Development Engineering, Engineering and Construction Services, Development Engineering - North York
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60307.pdf

MM37.48 - Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 295 Byng Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

 Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning Staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decision for 295 Byng Avenue.

Summary

On October 24, 2012, the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel considered an application for Minor Variances, submitted by the applicant, to permit the construction of a new two-storey dwelling at 295 Byng Avenue.  In their Staff Report, City Planning Staff recommended refusal of the proposed lot coverage of 37.9 percent.  In their decision, the Committee reduced the proposed lot coverage to 32 percent.  They also refused variances for a proposed east side yard setback of 1.21 metres and a proposed west side yard setback of 1.37 metres.  The applicants appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board, who refused their appeal on the grounds that "when the variances are considered collectively they would result in an over development of the site".

 

On June 19, 2013, a second application was considered by the Committee.  The applicants requested four minor variances, including a proposed east side yard setback of 1.22 metres, a proposed west side yard setback of 1.37 metres and a proposed lot coverage of 34 percent.  In their Staff Report, City Planning Staff recommended that the proposed lot coverage be reduced.  In their decision, the Committee reduced the proposed lot coverage to 32 percent, and increased both proposed side yard setbacks to 1.5 metres.

 

The applicants have appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This issue is time sensitive as the City was only recently notified of this appeal, and the City Solicitor and City Planner and Executive Director, City Planning will require time to prepare for the hearing, which may be scheduled before the next meeting of Council.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.48)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.48
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60276.pdf
(June 19, 2013) Communication and background materials from Councillor John Filion, Ward 23, Willowdale regarding 295 Byng Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60301.pdf

MM37.49 - Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 51 Stuart Crescent - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the City Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the lot severance and associated variances for 51 Stuart Crescent.

Summary

Applications for Consent and Minor Variance were submitted by the applicant to permit the severance of the subject property into two residential building lots and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling on each of the proposed lots.

 

In their Staff Report, City Planning Staff recommended that the applications be refused on the grounds that the proposed severance of this lot did not respect the physical character of the neighbourhood, would not meet the Zoning By-law regulations for an R6 zone and would create a precedent for similar severances in the neighbourhood. The report also added that proposed dwellings do not respect or reinforce the character of the neighbourhood in terms of side yard setbacks, overall building length and building height.

 

On June 19, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment refused the consent applications on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it was to be subdivided was not demonstrated, and the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots was not demonstrated. The associated variances were refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor.

 

The property owner has appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This issue is time sensitive as the City was only recently notified of this appeal, and the City Solicitor and City Planner and Executive Director, City Planning will require time to prepare for the hearing, which may be scheduled before the next meeting of Council.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.49)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.49
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60273.pdf
(June 14, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on 51 Stuart Crescent, File No. B010/13NY, A168/13NY and A169/13NY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60308.pdf

MM37.50 - Release of Section 37 Funds for Construction of Non-Profit Community Centre and Non-Profit Childcare Facility, Lansing United Church, 49 Bogert Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2013 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $6,837,922.21 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 4726-4750 Yonge Street, 9-31 Bogert Avenue, 2-28 Poyntz Avenue and 49 Bogert Avenue, (account: XR3026-3700388) for the purposes of constructing a non-profit, private community centre and a non-profit childcare facility, plus startup funds and operating reserves, at Lansing United Church, 49 Bogert Avenue.

 

2.         City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Trustees of the Lansing Congregation of the United Church of Canada, 49 Bogert Avenue, once the Trustees have signed an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements and an above-grade building permit has been issued which includes the community centre and childcare facilities in accordance with the Section 37 agreements.

Summary

Funds were secured and received through Section 37 from the development at 4726-4750 Yonge Street, 9-31 Bogert Avenue, 2-28 Poyntz Avenue and 49 Bogert Avenue in return for the increased density.  The $6,742,734.00 plus accrued interest of $95,188.21 is for a "social facility" in accordance with the North York Centre Secondary Plan.  Lansing United Church was part of the development lands.  Density was transferred from the Lansing United Church site and the funds were secured in order that Lansing United Church could construct and operate a non-profit community centre and a non-profit childcare facility.

 

The Section 37 agreement specifies that the funds are to be held in trust by the City and should be forwarded to Lansing United Church to pay for the costs of construction and furnishing of the community centre and childcare facility, plus startup, maintenance and repair funds. 

 

There are separate Section 37 agreements with the developer and with Lansing United Church, and the latter sets out the obligations of the Church in providing the above-mentioned facilities.  Any funds left over after construction will go into a reserve fund for the ongoing maintenance and repair of the facilities.  The agreement provides that the funds come to the City, are held in trust, and are conveyed to Lansing United Church once Lansing has obtained an above-grade permit for the facilities.

 

Lansing United Church will be required to sign an Undertaking, which will require that Lansing submit a brief audited financial statement to the City regarding the use of the Section 37 funds, at each year end until the funds plus any future accrued interest have been exhausted.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.50)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.50
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60277.pdf

MM37.51 - Basement Flooding Protection Subsidy Program - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to consider an increase in subsidy levels within the Basement Flooding Protection Subsidy Program to account for inflationary pressures that more closely reflect construction cost increases, as part of the 2014 Toronto Water Capital Budget submission.

Summary

The City of Toronto's Basement Flooding Subsidy Program offers owners of single-family, duplex and triplex residential homes a financial subsidy of up to $3,200 per property to install flood protection devices including a backwater valve, a sump pump, and pipe severance and capping of the home's storm sewer or external weeping tile connection.


With the increasing frequency of extreme storm events experienced in the City of Toronto, including the storm of July 8, 2013, which resulted in over 3,800 complaints of basement flooding, it is essential that the City encourage homeowners to take the appropriate action to reduce their risk of basement flooding on their own private property, by isolating their homes from the City's sewer system.

Subsidy levels in the Basement Flooding Protection Subsidy Program were last increased in 2008, as follows:

 

1.         Installation of sewer backwater valves was increased by $250, to a maximum of $1,250; and

 

2.         Installation of a sump pump was increased by $250, to a maximum of $1,750.

 

This subsidy program was designed to cover 80 percent of the invoiced cost of installation for flood protection devices.  To account for inflationary increases in the cost of installation of basement flooding protection devices since 2008, there is a need to increase subsidy levels in the program.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.51)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.51
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60274.pdf

MM37.52 - By-law Exemption to Waive Permit Fees on Temporary Street Occupation Permits to Assist Residents after the Major Storm on July 8, 2013 - by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council exempt the Street Occupation Fee for Disposal Bins, under City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 441, Appendix C – Schedule 2 from July 15, 2013 through July 31, 2013 under terms and conditions established by the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Summary

On July 8, 2013, the City of Toronto experienced record one-day rainfall and severe flooding damage.  Toronto received 126 millimeters of rain (equivalent to one month of rain) in one day.  The sudden rainfall flooded countless streets, highways and properties, leaving residents to deal with the aftermath.

 

Since the storm, numerous residents across the City have been requesting disposal bin permits, at a cost of $44.15 per day, plus HST, to facilitate their cleanup operations.  In an effort to assist residents, Transportation Services would like to initiate the issuance of disposal bin permits to residential property owners, free of charge for up to five consecutive days, between July 15, 2013 to July 31, 2015.

 

In order to provide this service, Toronto City Council must approve an Exemption from the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 441, Fees and Charges.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.52)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.52
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60275.pdf

MM37.53 - "Cause and Effect" of the Water Damage to Properties Particularly in the West End - by Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday, seconded by Mayor Rob Ford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Deputy Mayor Doug Holyday, seconded by Mayor Rob Ford, recommends that: 

 

1.         City Council request the City Manager and the General Manager, Toronto Water to report to the Public Works Committee on September 11, 2013 on the condition of the sewer systems and storm water storage capabilities within the areas of the City, particularly in Etobicoke York, that were most affected by the recent storm.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Manager to investigate possible Federal, Provincial or Municipal funding support that may be available for residents that have experienced severe damage to their property by the record rain fall that occurred on Monday, July 8, 2013 and report to the next scheduled meeting of the Executive Committee held on September 24, 2013.

Summary

In view of the fact that Toronto incurred a “hurricane hazel” like deluge in 2005, and now again on Monday, July 8, 2013, an overall review of Toronto’s water infrastructure spending is in order.

 

Between 2004 and today, Council has approved 9 percent hikes to the annual water rates. A planned drop to 3 percent as of 2015 requires further consideration.

 

Although the Toronto Water division has been forthright in presenting the realities and costs of wet weather flow management, a definitive long-term plan has not been approved by City Council.

 

It would be an abrogation of Council responsibilities if we do not request City Management to once again spell out the more immediate steps to be taken to bring Toronto’s ability to handle and absorb water downpours in short term periods of time into being.

 

It would also be useful if staff could further analyze and report on how previous improvements performed adequately and in what areas of water management prove to be inadequate.

 

Finally, a prioritization plan should be considered in regards to the identification and geographical mapping of areas most in need of upgrading.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.53)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.53
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60292.pdf

MM37.54 - Subway Platform Safety Barriers - by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Doug Ford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Anthony Perruzza, seconded by Councillor Doug Ford, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to:

 

a.          install subway platform edge doors for all new subway stations along the Spadina Subway Extension and any future subway stations;

 

b          develop a plan to retroactively install subway edge doors at all existing TTC subway stations;

 

c.          review all existing safety measures to prevent individuals from being injured by falling onto the subway tracks and actively advertise such measures; and

 

d.          install additional subway track power-off switches at the centre of all existing subway station platforms.

Summary

The Toronto Transit Commission estimates there are 20 suicide attempts on subway platforms each year.  In April 2013 alone, two individuals on separate events lost their balance and fell on the tracks due to medical emergencies.

 

An uncounted number of individuals end up on subway tracks each year as a result of mischief, the influence of alcohol/drugs, medical emergencies when standing too close and individuals attempting to rescue others.  The installation of subway platform edge doors would prevent the public from accessing the subway track and will save lives.

 

This matter is urgent as subway station construction is underway and subway platform edge doors could be installed as part of construction.  Subway platform edge doors are currently on the Toronto Transit Commission budget but are currently considered below the line expenditures.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.54)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.54
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60299.pdf

MM37.55 - 65 Threadneedle Crescent - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment File: A275/13NY - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor John Filion

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

 Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor John Filion, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear in support of decision A275/13NY of the Committee of Adjustment respecting 65 Threadneedle Crescent.

Summary

An application was submitted to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A275/13 NY) seeking relief from various provisions of North York By-Law 7625.  The applicant requested several variances, including a front yard setback of 2.68 metres, whereas a front yard setback of 5.25 metres is required.  The Committee of Adjustment refused the requested minor variances in a decision dated May 23, 2013 after finding that the variances did not meet the intent and purpose of either the Official Plan or Zoning By-law and ruled that the variance(s) was not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The applicant has appealed that decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

Accordingly, this Motion seeks to instruct staff to appear in support of the Committee of Adjustment decision.  Planning had written a report on the application requesting refusal of this application, unless the front yard setback was increased to a number more in keeping with the zoning by-law and intent of the Official Plan.  It is recommended that the City Solicitor be granted authority to attend this hearing in support of the Planning Staff report.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.55) 

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.55
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60295.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 65 Threadneedle Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60305.pdf

MM37.56 - Improving Community Safety in Toronto with regards to Dangerous Railway Cargo - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council officially request Transport Canada to advise the City of Toronto of the status of the recommendations of the Railway Safety Act Review and to expedite the implementation of new safety protocols on Canada's railway system including, but not limited to:

 

a.         phase out the use of DOT-111 tank cars for the transport of hazardous materials;

 

b.         end the practice of having only one engineer aboard when dangerous goods are being transported;

 

c.         limit transport of hazardous materials through routes with less habitants; and

 

d.         develop a protocol for communicating with the local municipality so that they can be more adequately prepared in the event of an emergency.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Manager and the Director, Office of Emergency Management, and all other relevant staff to review railway safety in Toronto to determine if there are any steps the City can take on its own, if any, to improve public safety with regards to risk mitigation in the transportation of dangerous goods by rail through Toronto.

Summary

Recent events give Torontonians cause for concern about railway safety in Toronto:

 

1.         The tragedy in Lac Mégantic.

 

2.         An incident in Calgary during the recent flooding there, where four petrochemical-laden railway cars derailed on a bridge over the Bow River.

 

3.         The breakdown of rail service and the trapping of a GO train in the flood waters of the Don Valley during the rain storm of July 8, 2013.

 

The Government of Canada is responsible for the safe operations of railways in the country through the Railway Safety Act (1985) and certain other Acts, regulations, standards, guidelines and policies in consequence thereof, including:

 

1.         The Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act, 1992, a Federal Act to promote public safety in the transportation of dangerous goods.

 

2.         Railway Safety Management System Regulations which requires a railway company to implement and maintain a safety management system.

 

3.         The Rail Safety Compliance and Enforcement Policy, which is a policy to provide guidance for promoting compliance with railway safety regulatory requirements, monitoring for compliance and safety, and for responding to non-compliance and concerns with respect to safe railway operations.

 

4.         Rules for the Control and Prevention of Fires on Railway Rights-of-Way, which requires railway companies to ensure that suitable measures are in place to prevent and control fires on railway rights-of-way and to extinguish all fires off the railway rights-of-way that were started as a result of railway operations.

 

5.         Rules Respecting Track Safety which prescribe minimum safety requirements for federally regulated standard gauge railway track.

 

Transport Canada develops safety standards and regulations, provides oversight and gives expert advice (through the Canadian Transport Energy Centre) on dangerous goods accidents to promote public safety in the transportation of dangerous goods by all modes of transport in Canada.

 

In December 2006, the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities initiated the Railway Safety Act Review.  The impetus for the Review was provided by the need to address concerns raised by recent high-profile railway accidents and to determine where safety improvements could be made.  The Review was aimed at identifying gaps in the Railway Safety Act, and making recommendations to strengthen the regulatory regime to meet the changing nature of the railway industry and its operations.

 

Currently, railway companies in Canada are not required to notify a municipality when rail cars carrying hazardous materials are passing through their communities.

 

The railway corridors are federally controlled and regulated, and municipalities are kept in the dark about what is being housed in the tankers while being transported through local communities.  There is a need for more communication to the local jurisdiction so that they can be more adequately prepared in the event of a derailment.

 

Advance information would make emergency management personnel aware of what hazardous materials are being transported through the City on any given day and at any given time.  When there is a call, if a mishap occurs, emergency personnel would know what they are dealing with and the decisions made based on best available information.

 

One major concern that has been raised in the media is the use of the DOT-111 tanker car for the transport of hazardous materials.  There is a push to phase out the use of DOT-111 tanker cars.  There is also a call to have the safety procedures around the transport of hazardous materials further improved (e.g., ending the practice of having only one engineer aboard when dangerous goods are being transported, limit transport of hazardous materials through routes with less habitants, etc.).

 

A 2011 audit of Transport Canada by the Commissioner for Environment and Sustainable Development found many serious problems with rail safety protocols in Canada.  Ministry of Transportation reports to address these concerns are past due and are now not expected for another year yet the shipments like the one that devastated Lac Mégantic have increased dramatically. 

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.56)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.56
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60297.pdf

MM37.57 - 854, 856 and 858 Dundas Street West, 217 and 219 Manning Avenue - Amendment to Zoning By-law Authorized by TE12.4 at the City Council Meeting of February 6 and 7, 2012 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailao

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Bill 1157 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Item TE12.4 adopted on February 6 and 7, 2012, by replacing the recommendations with the following:

 

a.         the lands at 854, 856 and 858 Dundas Street West and 217 and 219 Manning Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment "1" to the Motion of Councillor Layton.

 

b.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

 c.        Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of 854, 856 and 858 Dundas Street West and 217 and 219 Manning Avenue to submit a site plan application to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act.

 

2.             City Council determine through the adoption of this recommendation that, pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is to be given in respect of the changes to By-law No. 589-2007.

Summary

At its meeting held on February 6 and 7, 2012, City Council adopted Item TE12.4, which recommended amendments to the Zoning By-law for the former City of Toronto to permit: (a) at 854, 856 and 858 Dundas Street West, a 7-storey mixed use building containing 82 residential dwelling units and retail space at grade, and (b) at 217 and 219 Manning Avenue, 10 townhouses, five of which will front onto Manning Avenue, with the remaining five fronting onto the existing public laneway that runs in a north south direction, between Manning Avenue and Euclid Avenue.

 

The Council authority required the owner of each site to obtain Notice of Approval Conditions regarding site plan approval.  That has not yet happened and due to the summer recess of Council the applicant has requested this condition be revised to only submit a satisfactory site plan application.  This application has been submitted and I support that request.

 

However, these site plans would require the following changes to the form of the zoning by-law amendment that was previously approved by City Council: within Part A - the east set back has been changed from 5.5 to 3.0 metres; the height has been increased to 25.4 metres from 25.0 metres to allow for a mechanical penthouse; additional setbacks have been included for additional clarity, and established grades have been added.  No changes are proposed within Part B.

 

It is appropriate that these changes be made from the drawings and plans on the rezoning application which were before Community Council for the statutory public meeting and  before City Council in the Final Report.  It is also appropriate that the amendments as set out in this Motion be adopted without the need for any further public notice.

 

This is an urgent matter because of the summer recess as further delay may cause hardship to the applicant.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.57)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.57
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60293.pdf
Attachment 1 draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60302.pdf

MM37.58 - Financial Assistance for Damage Caused by the Storm on July 8, 2013 - by Councillor Peter Milczyn, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Peter Milczyn, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Manager to ensure that a thorough assessment of all damage caused to both private and public property by the storm and the subsequent flooding of July 8, 2013 is undertaken.

 

2.         City Council request the City Manager to ensure that an expedited process be put in place to review storm and flooding damage claims against the City of Toronto.

 

3.         City Council request the City Manager to seek financial assistance from the Provincial and Federal governments for damage to private and public property caused by the flooding of watercourses within the City of Toronto.

 

4.         City Council request the City Manager in consultation with Toronto Water and the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, to prepare a report to the Executive Committee before the end of 2013 on  budgetary and other requirements to minimize the impact of similar future storm events on private and public property within the City of Toronto.

 

5.         City Council request the City Manager to report to the Executive Committee before the end of 2013 on the City of Toronto response to the storm event, and in particular on improvements to how Civil authorities can communicate with the public during an extended power outage.

 

6.         City Council request the City Manager to work with Toronto Hydro on an enhanced communication plan for emergencies such as this and to report back to Executive Committee before the end of 2013.

Summary

An extraordinary meteorological event took place on July 8, 2013 where 126 mm of rain fell in a brief period of time when a storm system became stationary over parts of the City of Toronto.  This record setting rainfall caused extensive flooding due to overloading the storm sewer system, overland flooding, overflowing watercourses within the City, and sewer back up into homes and businesses.
This was subsequently exacerbated by an extended power outage to over 300,000 Toronto Hydro customers.  Some areas were without power for over 48 hours.


A thorough assessment of all damage caused by this event to both private and public property needs to be undertaken to understand the insured and uninsured losses suffered, the impact on the City’s budget from claims and infrastructure damage.


With so many property owners, tenants, and businesses affected by sewer back-up problems that arose from the storm an expedited process to handle claims is necessary.  Those who suffered losses need to understand as soon as possible what compensation they may be eligible to receive.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.58)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.58
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60311.pdf

MM37.59 - Combined Sewer Overflows Control in Humber River and Black Creek Sewersheds and Investigation of Basement Flooding in Study Areas 4 and 5 - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Maria Augimeri

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Maria Augimeri, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water to review the Class Environmental Assessment Study work schedule for Study Areas 4 and 5 and look at opportunities to advance the second public meeting.

Summary

The City of Toronto has initiated a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study to address water quality issues in Black Creek and Humber River due to the discharge of combined sewer overflows and to assess the causes of flooding and develop solutions to reduce the risk of future surface and basement flooding within basement flooding study areas 4 and 5.

 

A public meeting was held on Thursday November 1, 2012, to introduce the commencement of the Class Environmental Assessment Study for these areas.  The second public meeting in which the preferred solutions will be presented is anticipated for the fall of 2013.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.59)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.59
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60312.pdf

MM37.60 - Basement Flooding Protection Program - Project 16-03 - by Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - York Centre
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Maria Augimeri, seconded by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water to review the analysis completed by the engineering design team for Project 16-03 to identify potential cost reduction opportunities that would lower the cost per benefitting home below the $32,000 threshold approved by Council.

 

2.         Subject to achieving cost reductions for Project 16-03 to meet the threshold of $32,000 per benefitting home, City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water to incorporate these capital works in Toronto Water's forthcoming 2014-2018 update to the Basement Flooding Protection Program.

 

3.         City Council direct that if this cost reduction cannot be reached, the underground storm storage tank planned for Anthony Park be separated out from "Project 16-03" and be considered for inclusion in the capital works 2014 budget for Toronto Water.

Summary

The City of Toronto has completed a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment (EA) Study to address basement and surface flooding in the area loosely bounded by Black Creek/Jane Street, Wilson Avenue, Dufferin Street and the North York Municipal Boundary known as Basement Flooding Study Area 16.  The objective of the study was to provide recommendations to reduce the risk of future basement and surface flooding that can occur during heavy rainfall.

 

Project 16-03 of the Environmental Assessment Study recommended proceeding with preliminary design and costing of new storm sewers and storm sewer upgrades, additional inlet capacity, and underground storm storage tank that would be constructed on Lady York Avenue, Anthony Road, Hartham Place, Winston Park Boulevard, Northgate Drive, Whitley Avenue and Anthony Park.

 

The cost of the preliminary design for Project 16-03 exceeds the Council approved threshold amount of $32,000 per benefitting home.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.60)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.60
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60310.pdf

MM37.61 - Request for Exemption to Municipal Code Chapter 681, Sewers and Chapter 851, Water Supply for 511 Bremner Boulevard, 1001 Sheppard Avenue East and 200 Bloor Street West - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
20 - Trinity-Spadina, 24 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Coucillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to exempt the municipal properties known as:

 

a.         Block 33 of the Concord CityPlace Development - 511 Bremner Boulevard;

 

b.         Blocks 17 and 18 of the Concord Park Place Development - 1001 Sheppard Avenue East; and

 

c.          200 Bloor Street West;

 

from the requirement in §851–4F and §851–5S of Municipal Code Chapter 851, Water Supply, to provide a separate water service connection for each property to allow the servicing of the single building, located at each of these respective municipal addresses and comprised of several condominium corporations, with a single water service connection; provided that, in the determination of the General Manager, Toronto Water, the servicing meets the City’s standard construction specifications and drawings for sewers and watermains.

 

2.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Toronto Water, to exempt the municipal properties known as:

 

a.          Block 33 of the Concord CityPlace Development - 511 Bremner Boulevard;

 

b.         Blocks 17 and 18 of the Concord Park Place Development - 1001 Sheppard Avenue East; and

 

c.          200 Bloor Street West;

 

from the requirement in §681-11J of Municipal Code Chapter 681, Sewers, to provide a separate sanitary sewer service connection for each property to allow the servicing of the single building, located at each of these respective municipal addresses and comprised of several condominium corporations, with a single sanitary sewer service connection; provided that, in the determination of the General Manager, Toronto Water, the servicing meets the City’s standard construction specifications and drawings for sewers and watermains.

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to develop criteria for exemptions, in respect to a single building comprised of multiple properties, from the requirement for separate water and sewer servicing of properties and report back to the October 21, 2013 Public Works and Infrastructure Committee meeting, provided that the Chief Building Official confirms that the servicing complies with the requirements of the Ontario Building Code and the regulations thereunder.

Summary

Chapter 681 - Sewers, and Chapter 851- Water Supply of the Municipal Code require that every property have separate connections to the sanitary sewer system and the water distribution network. Based on this requirement, a single building, comprised of multiple "condominium corporations" or multiple "properties", requires separate service connections for each condominium corporation or property. Many of the condominium towers being constructed in the City of Toronto today are comprised of multiple condominium corporations, and the need to provide separate service connections to "properties" located at various elevations within a tower can be problematic. Staff are working to develop a solution to this issue, and will be reporting to an upcoming Public Works and Infrastructure Committee meeting with a proposed resolution.

 

In the interim, a number of condominium tower projects with multiple condominium corporations have proceeded to construction with a single set of service connections thus putting them in non-compliance with the City's by-laws. The purpose of this Notice of Motion is to seek exemption from these by-laws for the following properties, which are currently under construction:

 

1.         Block 33 of the Concord CityPlace Development - 511 Bremner Boulevard.

 

2.         Blocks 17 and 18 of the Concord Park Place Development - 1001 Sheppard Avenue East.

 

3.         200 Bloor Street West.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.61)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.61
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60327.pdf

MM37.62 - Authorized to Release Section 37 Funds from 77 Charles Street West for the Church Wellesley Business Improvement Area Church Street Summer Parklet Project - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.          City Council increase the approved 2013 Non-Program Operating Budget by $50,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 77 Charles Street West, (source account: XR3026-3700381), for the transfer to the Church Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area (CWVBIA) for the supply and installation of parklets for the Church Wellesley Business Improvement Area.

 

2.         City Council direct that the $50,000.00 be forwarded to the Church Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area upon the signing of an Undertaking by CWVBIA governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

The City has a long-standing partnership with the Church Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area (CWVBIA).  The CWVBIA is proposing to install parklets along the East side of Church Street through July to October 2013.  Parklets will be created within existing on-street parking areas in curb lanes along Church Street in downtown Toronto.   Each parklet will occupy a section of the street about as wide as a parked car (2 metres) and will range from 5.5 to 22 metres long.

 

Parklets are intended to meet the sidewalk grade to create a more walkable, accessible community with a variety of public spaces for passive use and active programming.  The majority of these installations will be passive-use public realm enhancements with 2-4 of the installations serving as extended licensed patios for businesses in the community.   The parklets can be stored and reinstalled on an annual basis during Summer months.

 

The parklets installations were approved at the June 18, 2013 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.

 

There is currently no funding included in the 2013 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for this project.

 

The funds were secured as part of a $100,000 cash contribution in the development at 77 Charles Street West for the purpose of area streetscape improvements, and have been received by the City.

 

Prior to receiving the funds, the Church Wellesley Village Business Improvement Area will be required to sign an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

 

This motion is deemed urgent in order for the Parklet project to be installed in July 2013.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.62)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.62
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60318.pdf

MM37.63 - 70 and 80 Wicksteed Avenue, 200, 202 and 204 Parkhurst Boulevard and 99 Vanderhoof Avenue - Amendment to City Council decision - by Councillor John Parker, seconded by Councillor Karen Stintz

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item NY23.34. A two-thirds vote is required to reopen the Item.
* If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Recommendations

Councillor John Parker, seconded by Councillor Karen Stintz, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Item NY23.34 by deleting the following Part 2.c:

 

2.         In accordance with the delegated approval under by-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision, as generally illustrated on Attachment 4 to this report subject to:

 

c.         the Notice of Decision of draft plan approval not being issued until the Zoning By-law amendment is in full force and effect.

Summary

At its meeting held on May 7, 2013, City Council adopted North York Community Council Item NY23.34, which recommended an amendment to the former Town of Leaside Zoning By-law 1916 to permit a large scale retail commercial centre at 70 and 80 Wicksteed Avenue, 202, 204 and 206 Parkhurst Boulevard and 99 Vanderhoof Avenue.  Prior to introducing the necessary Bills for enactment the owner is required to enter into a Section 37 Agreement, a Subdivision Agreement and Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Approval must be issued by the Director, Community Planning, North York District.   

 

It has come to City Planning's attention that the City Council decision included a staff recommendation in the Final Report from the Director, North York Community Planning dated February 5, 2013 that stipulated the Notice of Decision of draft plan of subdivision approval not be issued until the Zoning By-law amendment is in full force and effect.

 

This condition was inadvertently included and typically associated with draft plan of condominium approvals, not draft plan of subdivision approvals.  Issuance of the Notice of Decision is needed prior to the owner entering into the Subdivision Agreement contemplated as one of the pre-conditions to the Bill being introduced to City Council for enactment.

 

This is an urgent matter since City Council does not meet again until October 8, 2013. Bringing this matter forward at that time could result in undue hardship and delay to the owner.

 

REQUIRES RE-OPENING:

 

North York Community Council Item NY23.34, headed "Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications - 70 and 80 Wicksteed Avenue, 202, 204 and 206 Parkhurst Boulevard and 99 Vanderhoof Avenue" adopted by City Council on May 7, 2013, only as it pertains to Part 2.c.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16 and 17, 2013 as MM37.63)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.63
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60313.pdf

MM37.64 - Appointment of Administrator for the Purposes of the Ontario Works Act, 1997 - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor David Shiner

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor David Shiner, recommends that: 

  

1.         City Council appoint Patricia Walcott for the purposed of the Ontario Works Act, 1997, (the "Act") effective August 26, 2013.

 

2.         City Council request approval from the Director of Ontario Works, Ministry of Community and Social Services, for such appointment, as required under Section 43 of the Act.

Summary

Patricia Walcott is the successful candidate in the recent competition for the position of General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services.  In that position, Patricia Walcott will oversee the administration of the Ontario Works Act, 1997 (the "Act") and provision of assistance under the Act and carry out the duties of an administrator as set out in the Act.

 

The Act, which deals with the provision of social assistance in the Province, came into force in 1998 and replaced previously existing legislation dealing with the subject matter, namely the General Welfare Assistance Act.  Ontario Regulation 136/98, enacted under the Act, designated the City of Toronto as delivery agent for the purposes of the Act for the geographical area of the City of Toronto.

 

Section 43 of the Act provides as follows:  Each delivery agent shall, with the approval, of the Director (of Ontario Works, Ministry of Community and Social Services), appoint an administrator to oversee the administration of this Act and the provision of assistance in the delivery agent's geographic area.

 

In order to comply with the requirements of Section 43 of the Ontario Works Act, 1997, it is recommended that City Council appoint Patricia Walcott, General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, the administrator under Section 43 of the Ontario Works Act, 1997, and seek the approval of the Director of Ontario Works, Ministry of Community Services for such appointment.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2013 as MM37.64)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.64
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60325.pdf

MM37.65 - Reopening of TE24.11 and TE24.12 to Allow for Technical Amendments - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
** This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Items TE24.11 and TE24.12. A two-thirds vote is required to reopen the Item.
* If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that: 

 

A.        City Council amend Item TE24.11 by:

 1.        Revising Part 4 by adding the words ", and to include the Conveyance Lands" after "Victoria Street".

             2.          Adding the following new Part 6:

"6.        That City Council amend heritage designation By-law No. 131-90 of the former City of Toronto, under Section 30.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act, which applies to 197 Yonge Street, to remove the Conveyance Lands from the legal description following the completion of the conveyance of such lands to Massey Hall to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.”

 

B.        City Council amend Item 24.12 by:

 

1.         Revising clause i. of Part 1.a. by inserting the words ", the L2 platform" after "the new two storey basement".

2.         Revising Part 1.b. by inserting the words ",with the exception of permits required for maintenance, repairs and other usual and minor work provided all such work is acceptable to the Acting Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

            3.         Deleting clause i. of  Part 1.b. and replacing it with the following:

 

i.             “Execute a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 15 Shuter Street/178 Victoria Street and including the Conveyance Lands as defined below to the satisfaction of the Acting Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and register such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.” 

4.         Revising clause iii. of Part 1.b. to read as follows:

 

iii.        “Submit final building permit plans and drawings for the construction which comprises the Phase 1 Conservation Plan described in Recommendation 1.a.i., to the satisfaction of the Acting Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.”;

             5.        Adding the following new Part 5:

5.         That prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the property at 15 Shuter Street/178 Victoria Street, with the exception of permits for the Phase 1 Conservation Plan work, and permits for conservation work on the interior of Massey Hall, which are satisfactory to the Acting Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the owner shall:

i.          Obtain final site plan approval for Site Plan Application No. 12 256738 STE 27 SA from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

ii.         Obtain final approval for the necessary zoning by-law amendments required for the alterations to the property at 15 Shuter Street/178 Victoria Street, such amendments having been enacted by City Council and having come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

iii.        Provide a Conservation Plan(s) detailing all conservation work for the permits sought, to the satisfaction of the Acting Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

iv.        Submit final building permit plans and drawings for the proposed up to six storey addition to Massey Hall and the two level associated mechanical penthouse, satisfactory to the Acting Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

v.         Enter into and register against title to the lands known municipally in 2012 as 15 Shuter Street/178 Victoria Street (the "Massey Hall Lands) and the lands known municipally in 2012 as 197, 197R, 199, and 201 Yonge Street (the "197 Yonge Street Lands"),  an agreement between the City, the owner of the 197 Yonge Street Lands and the owner of the Massey Hall Lands (the "Three Party Agreement), pursuant to a fully in force and effect Zoning By-law Amendment and Section 37 Agreement for the 197 Yonge Street Lands, which is enacted by City Council and is in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.  Such Three Party Agreement to secure the conveyance of the Conveyance Lands as defined in the attached report, to Massey Hall, and to secure the limited purpose of the Conveyance Lands, and additionally to secure related easement(s) to Massey Hall, and a Construction Phasing Plan and schedule for the timing of construction for the Massey Hall alterations in conjunction with the redevelopment of the 197 Yonge Street Lands, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Acting Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

vi.        Obtain the conveyance in escrow of the Conveyance Lands as defined in the attached report, together with the related easement(s), to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor; and

 

vii.       Obtain any consents to sever required by the Planning Act for the conveyance and easement(s) required in Recommendation 5.v. and 5.vi. above.

Summary

This motion amends the heritage approvals for the Massey Hall expansion and 197 Yonge Street. It revises certain timing requirements and provided minor technical amendments at the recommendation of City Heritage staff and have been reviewed and agreed to by the City Solicitor.

  

This is an urgent matter due to Provincial and Federal funding commitments for this phase of the Massey Hall   revitalization project.  The changes sought to the previous City Council decision will enable the completion of agreements so that bills can be introduced for the October, 2013 City Council meeting and enable needed work to be done on Massey Hall, a designated heritage building, prior to such City Council meeting.

 

Requires Re-opening

 

Items TE24.11 and TE24.12 - June 11, 12 and 13, 2013 City Council meeting, only as they relate to heritage approvals, timing requirements and to make technical amendments.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2013 as MM37.65)

 

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.65
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60324.pdf

MM37.66 - Council Member Appointment to the Parks and Environment Committee - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council waive the requirement of Chapter 27, Council Procedures to canvass Members for their interest in filling the vacancy on the Parks and Environment Committee and appoint Councillor Robinson to the Parks and Environment Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014 and until a successor is appointed.

Summary

After discussions with Councillor Robinson, Councillor Wong-Tam has resigned from the Parks and Environment Committee.  Councillor Robinson has indicated a preference to sit on the Parks and Environment Committee and Councillor Wong-Tam is willing to move to the Community Development and Recreation Committee to fill the current vacancy there.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2013 at MM37.66)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.66
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60319.pdf

MM37.67 - 2522-2542 Keele Street - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Direction Report - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - York South-Weston
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded Councillor Peter Milczyn, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the following recommendations contained in the report (July 9, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning:

 

1.         City Council instruct the City Solicitor, City Planning staff and any other City staff to attend the OMB hearing generally in support of the revised proposal, provided that the outstanding matters identified in this report are secured through the Zoning By-law Amendment and through conditions of Site Plan Approval to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; and provided that appropriate facilities, services and matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act are secured in an agreement registered on title to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor prior to the issuance of any Board order.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to advise the OMB of the above Council position and to:

 

a.         request that the Board withhold its Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment application appeal until it has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is in a form satisfactory to the City and that the Section 37 Agreement required in Recommendation 1 above has been entered into and registered on title;

 

b.         request that the Board withhold its Order on the Site Plan Control application appeal until it has been advised by the City Solicitor that the Notice of Approval Conditions have been finalized, and any pre-approval conditions have been satisfied;

 

c.         request that the Board withhold its Orders on the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control application appeals until the applicant has designed and provided financial securities for the road widening as noted in this report to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Director, Engineering and Construction Services and at no cost to the City of Toronto; and

 

d.         request that the Board withhold its Orders on the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site plan Control appeals until a revised Functional Servicing Report has been submitted to the satisfaction of the Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

 3.        City Council authorize the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Summary

The applicant with respect to 2522-2542 Keele Street has appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Municipal Board ("OMB") citing City Council's failure to make a decision within the prescribed period of time.  The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has prepared a report for the purpose of seeking Council's direction regarding staff representation at the upcoming OMB Hearing.

 

The purpose of this Motion is to allow introduction and consideration of the report (July 9, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to the July 16, 17 and 18, 2013 meeting of City Council.

 

The OMB Hearing is scheduled for August 12, 2013 and consequently this is an urgent matter. 

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2013 as MM37.67)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.67
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60346.pdf
(July 9, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 2522-2542 Keele Street - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60347.pdf

Communications

(July 16, 2013) Petition from Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, Ward 12 - York South-Weston, containing the names of approximately 100 persons headed "2522 Keele Street (MM.New.MM33.67.1)

MM37.68 - Application for the Extension of a Liquor Licence at 2365 Kingston Road for a Community Fundraising, Barbecue and Festival on Private Property - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

 Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Glenn DeBaeremaeker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the extension of the liquor licence to accommodate the Tara Inn Restaurant and Pub, located at 2365 Kingston Road, which is hosting a two day Barbecue and Festival fundraising event to support Variety Village and engage local community.  The hours of operation include Saturday, August 17, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and on Sunday, August 18, 2013 from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.

Summary

On August 17 and 18, 2013, the Tara Inn Restaurant and Pub, located at 2365 Kingston Road , are hosting a two day Barbecue and Festival fundraising event to support Variety Village and engage local community.  The hours of operation include Saturday, August 17, 2013 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. and on Sunday, August 18, 2013 from 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.  An extension to their liquor licence is required in order to accommodate the expected number of attendees.  The extension request for the licence remains on private property.  

 

Approvals have been obtained from the landlord and other tenants in the plaza.

 

The Tara Inn is a licenced establishment with a licenced patio. 

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2013 as MM37.68)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.68
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60349.pdf

MM37.69 - 77 Clansman Boulevard - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision for File: A2432/13NY - Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Karen Stintz

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral.
* This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Karen Stintz, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal to the Committee of Adjustment decision granting variances for 77 Clansman Boulevard (A432/13NY).

 

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the variance sought for 77 Clansman Boulevard and authorize the City Solicitor to retain as outside planning consultant as necessary.

Summary

On Wednesday, July 17, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel considered an application for Minor Variances submitted by the Architect on behalf of the owner to permit the construction of a new two-storey dwelling at 77 Clansman Boulevard (A432/13NY).   There were numerous variances, including a proposed lot coverage of 36.55 percent, and a request for proposed north and south side yard setback of 1.22 m whereas the minimum required north and south side yard setback is 1.8 m.

   

At the hearing on July 17, 2013,  the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel approved the application.  The north and south side yard setbacks were increased to 1.75 m and the proposed lot coverage was reduced to 35 percent.   Although, this is less than what was originally requested, it is still significantly more than both the 30 percent that the by-law permits, and the maximum of 32 percent previously approved by the Committee of Adjustment on numerous other applications.  The variance does not respect or reinforce the character of the neighbourhood.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2013 as MM37.69)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.69
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60362.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 77 Clansman Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60363.pdf

MM37.70 - Bathurst Street - Interim Control By-law - Final Report - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
This Motion relates to an Interim Control By-law and requires a majority vote to introduce.

Bill 1170 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the following recommendations contained in the report (July 18, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning, headed "Bathurst Street - Interim Control By-law - Final Report":

  

            1.         Pursuant to Section 38 of the Planning Act, City Council enact the Interim Control By-law, attached as Attachment 1 to the final report dated  July 18, 2013 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, for a period of one year to study the retail and service permissions contained in Sections 8(1)(f)(b)(iv) and 9(1)(f)(b)(iv) and (xi)  and Section12(2) 270(a) of By-law 438-86.

 

            2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Interim Control By-Law as may be required.

Summary

This Motion is intended to adopt the planning recommendations to enact an Interim Control By-law on the lands generally bounded by Queen Street West to the south, the Dupont Street train tracks to the north and the properties fronting onto Bathurst Street to the east and the west to prohibit the addition of retail and service uses for a period of one year.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 18, 2013 as MM37.70)

Background Information

Member Motion MM37.70
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60355.pdf
(July 18, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-60356.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 37

BL37.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact general bills and confirming bills.

Background Information

(July 22, 2013) Consolidated By-law Index for July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013 City Council meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-60287.htm
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council