City Council

Meeting No.:
45
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Monday, December 16, 2013

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

Wednesday, December 18, 2013

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
clerk@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed.  The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

 

Members of Council and Staff:  Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended.  The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements:  If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

December 11, 2013


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at  www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

 

 

 

Routine Matters - Meeting 45

RM45.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

• O Canada

• Moment of Silence

• Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Nelson Mandela
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65232.pdf
Condolence Motion for Constable John Zivcic
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65233.pdf
Condolence Motion for Ulysses Curtis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65184.pdf
Condolence Motion for Adrian Dudzicki
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65234.pdf
Condolence Motion for Nikolaos (Nick) Mirkopoulos
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65185.pdf
Condolence Motion for Ian Pryce
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65235.pdf
Condolence Motion for Muriel Sides
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65246.pdf
Condolence Motion for Elizabeth Sweeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65236.pdf
Condolence Motion for Jason Wong
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65247.pdf
Condolence Motion for The Hon. Alan M. Robinson
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65237.pdf

RM45.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on November 13, 14, 15 and 18, 2013 and the special meetings held on November 15, 2013 and November 18, 2013.

RM45.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Deferred Committee Item:

                         Striking Committee Item ST12.3

                           

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 36 on December 5, 2013

                         Submitted by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, Chair

 

Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 25 on November 4, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair

 

Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 25 on December 4, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Chair

 

Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 27 on November 22, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 26 on November 21, 2013

Submitted by Councillor David Shiner, Chair

 

Report of the Licensing and Standards Committee from Meeting 25 on December 9, 2013

                            Submitted by Councillor Cesar Palacio, Chair

 

Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 24 on December 6, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 28 on November 21, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Peter Milczyn, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 29 on December 4, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Peter Milczyn, Chair

 

Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 27 on November 20, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 29 on November 19, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 28 on November 19, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 28 on November 19, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, Chair

 

Report of the Toronto and East York Council from Meeting 28 on November 19, 2013

Submitted by Councillor Paula Fletcher, Chair

 

New Business and Business Previously Requested submitted by City Officials

RM45.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM45.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

RM45.6 - Review the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

December 16, 2013 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64970.pdf
December 17, 2013 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65198.pdf
December 18, 2013 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65183.pdf

Deferred Item - Meeting 45

ST12.3 - Council Member Appointment to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee

(Deferred by City Council from November 13, 2013 - 2013.ST12.3)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Items ST12.3 and EX36.12 will be considered together

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee submits this Item to City Council without recommendation.

Summary

The Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee is composed of 3 Members from the Community Development and Recreation Committee, and 3 Members from the Economic Development Committee.

 

Councillor Ana Bailão was previously appointed to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee as a member from the Community Development and Recreation Committee. As a result of Councillor Bailão's recent resignation from the Community Development and Recreation Committee, Council must appoint a replacement member from the Community Development and Recreation Committee.

 

Members of Council have been canvassed for their interest in being appointed to the Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee for a term of office until November 30, 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

Interested Members - Community Partnership and Investment Program Appeals Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-62914.pdf

Executive Committee - Meeting 36

EX36.2 - Tenant Issues Related to the Residential Tenancies Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Government of Ontario to:

 

a.         discontinue the exemption pertaining to rent increases for rental housing built or occupied after November 1991;

 

b.         institute an automatic rent freeze in rental buildings for non-compliance with work orders; and

 

c.         collaborate with the City to set up an automated system for direct access to work orders to eliminate the need for tenants to provide proof of the work orders to the Landlord and Tenant Board.

 

2.         City Council request the Provincial government to provide the City of Toronto with the powers under the City of Toronto Act to enable the City to undertake new measures to improve the quality of rental housing in Toronto, such as rent freezes, vacancy control or landlord licensing.

Origin

(October 15, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report responds to a request by the Executive Committee at its meeting of May 28, 2013 to review and report back on a motion concerning two tenant issues related to the Residential Tenancies Act (RTA) in private rental housing.

 

The motion recommended that the City request the Government of Ontario to:

 

a.         discontinue the exemption pertaining to rent increases for rental housing built or occupied after November 1991;

 

b.         institute an automatic rent freeze in rental buildings for non-compliance with work orders; and;

 

c.         collaborate with the City to set up an automated system for direct access to work orders to eliminate the need for tenants to provide proof of the work orders to the Landlord and Tenant Board.

 

This report is provided for information only.  It has been prepared in consultation with the Affordable Housing Office, City Planning Division and Municipal Licensing and Standards Division.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 15, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Tenant Issues Related to the Residential Tenancies Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63467.pdf

Speakers

John Plumadore, Chair, Tenant Action Committee
Barbara Hurd, Community Legal Worker, Housing Action Now
Kenn Hale, Director, Legal Services, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (ACTO)
Geri Stevens, Toronto Acorn
Pamela Tindall
Geordie Dent, FMTA
Benjamin Ries
Jade Jenkins, Kelvungrove Tenants Association
Councillor Frances Nunziata
Councillor Janet Davis

Communications (Committee)

(October 28, 2013) E-mail from Peter Clarke (EX.Main.EX36.2.1)
(December 3, 2013) E-mail from Daryl Chong, President and CEO, Greater Toronto Apartment Association (GTAA) (EX.New.EX36.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-42147.pdf

EX36.3 - City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1754 has been submitted on this Item.

Communications EX36.3.3 to EX36.3.13 have been submitted on this Item

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the amended City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy (the "Policy") as set out in Appendix 1 to the report (November 19, 2013) from the City Manager.

 

2.         City Council delegate the authority to the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to make a final determination as to whether a street name is a duplicate or is similar sounding, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Policy, and to reject any names objected to by Toronto Fire Services, Toronto Police Service and Toronto Emergency Medical Services.

 

3.         City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary bills, including amendments to Chapter 27, Council Procedures, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code to give effect.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report summarizes the issues associated with the City’s existing Honourific and Street Naming Policy and recommends amendments to the Policy to provide additional clarity and definition to the street naming criteria, and to provide for the honouring of worthy individuals, living or deceased, as it relates to both property and street naming.  Additionally, an amendment is sought to delegate authority to the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, for a final determination on duplicate and similar sounding street names, and objections raised by Toronto Fire Services, Toronto Police Service and Toronto Emergency Medical Services.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2013) Report with Appendix 1, from the City Manager on City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64034.pdf
(November 28, 2013) Public Notice - Amendments to Chapter 27, City of Toronto Municipal Code, Council Procedures
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64317.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 3, 2013) E-mail from Geoff Kettel, Chair, North York Preservation Panel (EX.New.EX36.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-42148.pdf
(December 5, 2013) E-mail from Bill Aird (EX.New.EX36.3.2)

Communications (City Council)

(December 3, 2013) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Chair, North York Community Preservation Panel (CC.Supp.EX36.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42260.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Ralph Daley, President, Grange Community Association (CC.New.EX36.3.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43871.pdf
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Denise Harris, Heritage Officer, Etobicoke Historical Society (CC.New.EX36.3.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43872.pdf
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Elleen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.EX36.3.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43873.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Sheila Dunlop, Secretary, South Armour Heights Residents' Association (CC.New.EX36.3.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43874.pdf
(December 16, 2013) Letter from David Fleming, Executive Secretary, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association and Swansea Area Ratepayers' Group (CC.New.EX36.3.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44073.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Mary C. Korda (CC.New.EX36.3.9)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, President, Ossington Community Association (CC.New.EX36.3.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44075.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from E. L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents'Association (CC.New.EX36.3.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44076.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Jane Johnston (CC.New.EX36.3.13)

EX36.4 - Lobbying By-Law - Exempted Bodies

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1727 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council exempt the board members, employees and officers of Casa Loma Corporation and Lakeshore Arena Corporation, when acting in their official capacity, from Municipal Code Chapter 140, Lobbying, by authorizing an amendment to Chapter 140 to add “Casa Loma Corporation” and “Lakeshore Arena Corporation” to the list of exempted municipal level corporations and other bodies in Schedule A, as set out in Appendix 1 to the report (November 18, 2013) from the City Manager.

 

2.         City Council authorize the following amendments to the list of exempted municipal level corporations and other bodies in Schedule A of Municipal Code Chapter 140, Lobbying, as set out in Appendix 1 to the report (November 18, 2013) from the City Manager, to reflect name changes:

 

a.         remove “Toronto Economic Development Corporation” and replace it with “Toronto Economic Development Corporation (operating as Toronto Port Lands Company)”;

 

b.         remove “Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation” and replace it with “Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation (operating as Waterfront Toronto)”; and

 

c.         remove “Toronto Transit Consulting Ltd.” and replace it with “Toronto Transit Infrastructure Ltd.”.

 

3.         City Council authorize an amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 140, Lobbying, by removing “Enwave Energy Corporation” from the list of exempted municipal level corporations and other bodies in Schedule A, as set out in Appendix 1 to the report (November 18, 2013) from the City Manager, and request the Lobbyist Registrar to communicate this change and its implications to Enwave Energy Corporation.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to introduce the necessary bills and to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto.

Origin

(November 18, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends amendments to Schedule A of Municipal Code Chapter 140, Lobbying (the “Lobbying By-law”), to recognize changes that have occurred with respect to City owned and partnered corporations. 

 

Board members, officers and employees of City owned and partnered corporations by necessity routinely communicate with City officials.  The lobbyist registration requirement was not intended to apply to this type of relationship.  To facilitate ongoing governance relations, City Council at the outset approved an exemption from the lobbyist registration requirements for City owned and partnered corporations.

 

The amendments recommended in this report ensure that the governance principle embedded in Schedule A, which exempts City owned and partnered corporations from the requirement to register as lobbyists when communicating with public office holders of the City (as defined in Chapter 140), is applied consistently across all corporations of the City. 

 

The amendments include:

 

-           extending the exemption from the registration requirement to the Casa Loma Corporation and Lakeshore Arena Corporation;

-           reflecting changes in the names of certain corporations; and

-           removing the exemption from the registration requirement for Enwave Energy Corporation in which the City no longer has a shareholder interest.

 

Staff have consulted with the Lobbyist Registrar in the preparation of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2013) Report with Appendix 1, from the City Manager on Lobbying By-Law - Exempted Bodies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63981.pdf

EX36.5 - Urban Aboriginal Framework

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (November 21, 2013) from the City Manager, for information.

Origin

(November 21, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

The report responds to City Council's decision to develop an Urban Aboriginal Framework (UAF) for Toronto.  The UAF provides a guiding framework that brings together community aspirations and City responsibilities.  The UAF has been developed in two phases.  The first phase was the Statement of Commitment to the Aboriginal Communities of Toronto which was adopted by City Council in July 2010.  The second phase was an Action Plan to support the fulfilling the Statement of Commitment, which was approved by Council in November 2012.

 

This report provides the second annual update on the implementation progress of the UAF. This report also responds to the accountability section of the Statement of Commitment which requires annual progress updates to both the Council and Aboriginal Affairs Committee.

 

Key highlights on the progress made to date include:

 

-           Education of the Toronto Public Service was a commitment for the City of Toronto and City staff have developed an educational strategy detailed in Appendix 1;

 

-           The City of Toronto, other funders and the Aboriginal Affairs committee have discussed ways to strengthen the capacity of Aboriginal organizations.  These discussions will continue in 2014 with the intent of developing and piloting specific initiatives to meet the commitment to build capacity with Aboriginal organizations;

 

-           A corporate-wide inventory of existing programs being delivered to the Aboriginal community was conducted with seven divisions.  The divisions responded that they have specific programs that are delivered to the Aboriginal communities (detailed in Appendix 2).  The purpose of the inventory is to establish a benchmark and to determine where there are gaps in service and an opportunity to develop more complementary services; and

 

-           An added element to this UAF is the creation of an Aboriginal Employment Strategy as directed by Council at its meeting in June 2013. This Strategy is currently being developed and will be reported to City Council in early 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 21, 2013) Report with Appendices 1 and 2, from the City Manager on Urban Aboriginal Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64158.pdf

EX36.6 - Major Civic Theatres - Update on Strategic and Business Plans

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (November 21, 2013) from the City Manager and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, for information.

Origin

(November 21, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an update to City Council about Toronto's Major Civic Theatres as directed at its meeting of November 27, 28 and 29, 2012. City Council recognized the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts and the Toronto Centre for the Arts as community cultural assets and directed the Boards of these two theatres to prepare long-term strategic and five-year business plans to enhance their functions. These plans have been completed and approved by their respective boards.

 

Executive Committee requested the Board of Directors of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts (operating name for the Hummingbird Centre for the Performing Arts) to develop and submit to the City of Toronto through the City Manager's Office, a long-term strategic plan and a five-year business plan for the Centre to continue as a City-owned theatre, which will substantially reduce or eliminate the City's subsidy.

 

The Boards of Directors of all three Civic Theatres have agreed to discuss options to advance the missions of each of the three theatres while increasing the effectiveness of their operations. A Theatres Working Group has been established, comprised of the Board Chairs, Vice Chairs and City Councillors on the Boards of the theatres and external cultural sector representatives, with support from senior management of the theatres and City staff from the City Manager’s Office and Economic Development and Culture. The Theatres Working Group, with the General Manager, EDC, will undertake a consultant study of future governance and operating models and make recommendations on an implementation strategy for the three theatres in a report to the Economic Development Committee by the end of the second quarter of 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 21, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Major Civic Theatres - Update on Strategic and Business Plans
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64195.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Pam McConnell

EX36.10 - An Integrated Service System Approach to Vulnerability

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to establish the Specialized Program for Interdivisional Enhanced Responsiveness (SPIDER) on a 'proof of concept' basis.

 

2.         City Council authorize that the 2014 Operating Budget of Social Development, Finance and Administration be increased by $199,000 gross and zero net to reflect the two new temporary staff positions and the funds be allocated through Interdivisional Recovery (IDR) from the Toronto Employment and Social Services Division.

 

3.         City Council authorize that the 2014 Operating Budget of Toronto Employment and Social Services be adjusted to include a draw of $199,000 equal to the gross expenditures from the Social Assistance Stabilization Reserve and transfer the funds to Social Development, Finance and Administration through Interdivisional Charges (IDC).

 

4.         City Council forward a copy of this report to the Board of Health for information.

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and the Medical Officer of Health

Summary

This report outlines a proposal for a dedicated unit to provide for a more integrated approach to extreme individual and community impact cases that involve residents facing increased vulnerability.

 

Various City Divisions and Agencies are the first responders to complex property and community standards issues, some of which are as a result of a person experiencing vulnerability. City staff have encountered extreme cases of chronic hoarding of animals, possessions and refuse, multiple property standards and fire code violations, bed bug and other pest infestations, and while they take the immediate appropriate actions to remedy the circumstance at the time, often additional, chronic issues may go unresolved from the perspective of both the individual resident and/or surrounding neighbourhood residents. In some cases, individual residents may persist in exercising their legal rights to refuse assistance, including mental health and substance use related interventions. 

 

In an effort to improve the City's capacity to respond effectively to these extreme cases that involve multiple City Divisions and Agencies, the City is developing a new unit, the Specialized Program for Interdivisional Enhanced Responsiveness (SPIDER) to assist in the coordination and navigation of health, social and community service systems. This navigation support will be reserved for only the most extreme cases involving interaction among multiple service systems and will ensure that: (1) the various City responses are coordinated; and (2) existing health, social and community services are proffered to reduce the recurrence of cases and improve resident and community outcomes.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Report with Appendix A, from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Medical Officer of Health on An Integrated Service System Approach to Vulnerability
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64007.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 4, 2013) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow and Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon (EX.New.EX36.10.1)

EX36.11 - Update on School Board Properties and the School Lands Acquisition Framework

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council maintain the remaining funds contained in the Lands Acquisition Fund under the School Lands Acquisition Framework so that they may be accessed for an appropriate purchase in the future.

 

2.         City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to reassess the City's interest in the Toronto District School Board's Midland/Lawrence redevelopment site (Bendale Business and Technical Institute, David and Mary Thomson Collegiate Institute) and report to the February 4, 2014 Executive Committee.

Origin

(November 21, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Adminstration

Summary

This report provides information about the anticipated impact of the Toronto District School Board’s three year 2013-2016 Capital Plan. The Capital Plan involves the sale of eight TDSB properties, four of which are closed surplus schools and the remaining four land severances. This report identifies the potential impacts on local community access to green space and recreational and other community facilities. This report also provides an update on the School Lands Acquisition Framework.

 

Council authorized funding from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF) in the amount of $7 million, $5 million and $3 million in each of the years 2011, 2012 and 2013 respectively to help fund school land acquisitions that have been identified as a priority for the City. The Framework specifies that its dedicated funds in the LARF should be accessed only when there are no other sources of funding (for example, Parkland Acquisition Local Reserve Funds) that can be accessed for acquisition of a school property.

 

$5.942 million from the designated LARF funding of $15.0 million was authorised by Council for the purchase of land at Timothy Eaton for the development of a community hub.  This report recommends that the remaining designated funds of $9.058 million be maintained in order to purchase future properties deemed to be high priority under the framework and for which no other source of funding is available.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 21, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Update on School Board Properties and the School Lands Acquisition Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64013.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Janet Davis

Communications (Committee)

(December 5, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes (EX.New.EX36.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/comm/communicationfile-42172.pdf

EX36.12 - Customer Service Review of the Community Partnership and Investment Programs (CPIP) Appeal Process

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Items ST12.3 and EX36.12 will be considered together

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council dissolve the current Community Partnership and Investment Programs (CPIP) Appeals Committee.

 

2.         City Council direct the Division Heads responsible for the administration of Community Partnership and Investment Programs (CPIP) programs to establish and administer open, accountable and accessible appeal processes for the 2014 allocations process.

 

3.         City Council amend the approval authority delegated to Division Heads responsible for the administration of Community Partnership and Investment Programs (CPIP) programs to include approval of recommendations from Appeals Panels.

Origin

(November 21, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration Division

Summary

At its meeting on May 28, 2013, the Community Development and Recreation Committee directed the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration (SDFA) to review the appeals process currently used for Community Partnership and Investment Programs (CPIP) and report back on options to improve the process.

 

In response, this report recommends the dissolution of the current CPIP Appeals Committee and directs Division Heads responsible for the administration of CPIP programs to establish and administer open, accountable and accessible appeal processes for the 2014 allocations process.

 

To ensure better customer service, this new Appeals Panel will schedule appointments with appellant organizations. In addition, shared principles, criteria and mechanisms (where appropriate) where be created for appeals processes across all CPIP areas. These strategies will serve to enhance the City's commitment to provide an open, accountable and accessible grants management system, including grant appeals.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 21, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration Division on Customer Service Review of the Community Partnership and Investment Programs (CPIP) Appeal Process
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64014.pdf

Speakers

Herman Ellis Jr., Scadding Court Community Centre (Submission Filed)

Communications (Committee)

(December 4, 2013) E-mail from Herman Ellis Jr. (EX.New.EX36.12.1)

EX36.13 - Initiatives to Address Human Trafficking

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to continue to oversee the City's Human Trafficking Working Group and report on the status of the City of Toronto's initiatives to address human trafficking by February 2015.

 

2.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with the Toronto Police Service and other stakeholders, including but not limited to organizations that serve trafficked persons, and other City divisions, as appropriate, to undertake a review of licensing bylaws concerning trades and businesses that are known to be destinations for human trafficking with the objective of establishing measures and policies aimed at addressing the consequences of human trafficking from the perspectives of health and safety, and crime prevention.

 

3.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in collaboration with the Toronto Police Service, other orders of government and agencies, as well as other City divisions, as appropriate, to develop and deliver training specific to the needs of Municipal Licensing and Standards front-line and management staff, with the focus on the recognition of indicators of human trafficking; and to establish a protocol concerning a referral of suspected cases of human trafficking to appropriate agencies.

 

4.         City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board / Chief of Toronto Police Service to consider the following:

 

a.         to deliver training to an appropriate number of community response officers across all police divisions to recognize the indicators of human trafficking based on the definition under the Canada’s Criminal Code and the City’s definition outlined in this report;

 

b.         to undertake a policy and procedure review concerning human trafficking investigations to include, all forms of human trafficking crimes; and

 

c.         to determine the most appropriate tools to develop benchmarks to monitor all forms of human trafficking in Toronto.

 

5.         City Council direct the Human Trafficking Working Group to work with Human Resources to develop appropriate awareness training for key front line staff on how to recognize indicators of human trafficking.

 

6.         City Council direct that a copy of this report be forwarded to the School Boards that serve the city of Toronto, the Toronto Public Library Board, Board of Health, Toronto Transit Commission, and Toronto Community Housing Corporation Board with a request that they develop and deliver appropriate training to their front-line staff with the focus on the recognition of indicators of human trafficking, establish a human trafficking protocol when staff is aware of signs of trafficking and the process to refer services to appropriate service providers.

 

7.         City Council request the Ontario Press Council and the Newspapers Canada to develop anti-human trafficking guidelines/practices related to advertising, particularly in cases where there is a suspicion that the ad may involve exploitation of a minor, and that the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, in consultation with Strategic Communications, report back on the progress and response received to this request.

 

8.         City Council request the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, to work with the City's Human Trafficking Working Group and external stakeholders and report back to the Executive Committee regarding the establishment of a hotline and support services for trafficked persons, including the resources required.

 

9.         City Council request the City Manager, the City Solicitor, and the Deputy City Managers, Clusters A and B, to report back to the Executive Committee on a strategy to more vigorously prosecute charges related to municipal by law infractions by the adult entertainment, body rub, and holistic license classes.

Origin

(November 21, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

This report responds to City Council’s request for coordinated efforts to address human trafficking in Toronto. A City Human Trafficking Working Group was created by Social Development, Finance and Administration to review the issue of human trafficking and to identify measures aimed to strengthen the protection of Toronto residents and communities from human traffickers; as well as to determine opportunities to improve City services for trafficked persons, especially women and children.

 

Twenty-one (21) City agencies, boards, commissions, corporations and divisions worked with several community-based organizations, and other orders of government to identify initiatives that would effectively respond to the needs of trafficked persons. There was support for the following working definition to be used by the City: "An act by a person, or group of people that involves recruiting, transporting or receiving persons, harbouring, luring, exercising control over a person by means of threat, use of force or other forms of coercion or influence for the purpose of exploitation, including sexual exploitation, forced labour, and/or forced marriages."

 

In order to address the needs of trafficked persons, the focus is placed on functional service areas. The steps include: (1) identify supports required, (2) match the City service area, (3) identify mechanism to coordinate implementation and monitor progress, (4) identify service system opportunities and challenges, (5) strengthen awareness of human trafficking issues through redesigning staff training, and developing specialized training to handle cases of human trafficking, (6) development of efficient and clear protocol on how to handle cases of human trafficking, (7) provision of protocol training to staff, and (8) systemic review and reporting of effectiveness of City's initiatives. This process will allow the City to provide a sustainable response system for trafficked persons who are on the path to restoring their lives.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 21, 2013) Report with Appendices A to E, from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards on Initiatives to Address Human Trafficking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63985.pdf

Speakers

Barb Gosse
Varka Kalaydzhieva, FCJ Refugee Centre

EX36.14 - Administrative Amendments to Reserve Fund Accounts - 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1766 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account called the ‘Scarborough Transit Reserve Fund’ in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to accumulate funds including proceeds from a special levy of property taxes to partially fund a replacement for the current rapid transit line in Scarborough, with criteria as set out in Appendix 1 to the report (November 21, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

2.         City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account called the ‘Culture Funding Reserve Fund’ in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which is to use the proceeds of the retroactive payment of the Third Party Sign Tax from 2009 – 2012 to partially mitigate future year tax increases in connection with the arts and culture program with criteria as set out in Appendix 2 to the report (November 21, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

3.         City Council transfer funds in the amount of $16.5 million from the Tax Stabilization Reserve (XQ0703) in Schedule 3 of Chapter 227 to the new Culture Funding Reserve Fund (created by Recommendation 2 above).

 

4.         City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account called the ‘Transit Infrastructure Reserve Fund' in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which will is to offset TTC debt charges in the future with criteria as set out in Appendix 3 to the report (November 21, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

5.         City Council transfer the balance of the funds in the Ontario Bus Replacement Program Reserve Fund (XR3022) in Schedule 15 of Chapter 227 to the new Transit Infrastructure Reserve Fund (created in recommendation 4 above), and that the account be closed and deleted from Chapter 227.

 

6.         City Council change the name of the Jewish War Memorial Maintenance and Operation Reserve Fund (XR3207) in Schedule 3 of Chapter 227 to the Jewish War and Holocaust Memorial Reserve Fund.

 

7.         City Council close and delete the following accounts from Chapter 227 because they have or will have zero balances:

 

Zero Balances

Reserve Accounts

Beneficial Program

Schedule

Hydro Stabilization Reserve  (XQ0705

Deputy City Manager/CFO

3

Building Permit Service Delivery Reserve (XQ1302)

Toronto Building

1

Contingency Appeals Reserve (XQ1500)

Court Services

1

Land Acquisition for Source Water Protection Reserve (XQ1403)

Toronto Water

2

Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre Reserve Fund (XR1105)

Eastview N.C.C.

7

Parkland Acquisition - Pre 1999 (East York) Reserve Fund (XR2001)

Parks, Forestry & Recreation

10

Parkland Acquisition - City Wide/New Development (York) Reserve Fund (XR2046)

Parks, Forestry & Recreation

10

Parkland Acquisition - City Wide/Land Acquisition (Scarborough) Reserve Fund (XR2047)

Parks, Forestry & Recreation

10

Public Transit Capital Trust Reserve Fund (XR3021)

TTC

15

Transit technology Infrastructure Program Reserve Fund (XR3023)

TTC

15

Ontario Rolling Stock Infrastructure Fund (XR3024)

TTC

15

Police OMERS Type 3Reserve Fund (XR3701)

Toronto Police Service

15

 

8.         City Council authorize the following actions with respect to the closing of the Energy Conservation Reserve Fund (XR1715) in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227:

 

a.         transfer all but $13.5 million back to the Strategic Infrastructure Reserve Fund (XR1714) in Schedule 7 of the Chapter 227;

 

b.         credit all loan payments made under the revolving loan program funded by this Reserve Fund to the Strategic Infrastructure Reserve Fund;

 

c.         when all loans have been repaid, direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report further on the interest earnings on the fund and the assignment of  such earnings  to the Emerald Ash Borer Program, if required; and

 

d.         close the Reserve Fund once all the funds have been expended and delete the Reserve Fund from Chapter 227.

 

9.         City Council authorize the following actions with respect to the closing of the Green Energy Reserve Fund (XR1716) in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227:

 

a.         transfer all but $3.1 million back to the Strategic Infrastructure Reserve Fund (XR1714) in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227;

 

b.         credit all loan payments made under the revolving loan program funded by this Reserve Fund to the Strategic Infrastructure Reserve Fund;

 

c.         when all loans have been repaid, direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report further on the interest earnings on the fund and the assignment of  such earnings  to the Emerald Ash Borer Program, if required; and

 

d.         close the Reserve Fund once all the funds have been expended and delete the Reserve Fund from Chapter 227.

 

10.       City Council increase the authorized total transfer to the Environment Protection Reserve Fund (XR1718) in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227 from the Strategic Infrastructure Reserve Fund (XR1714) in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227 from $93.3 million to $149.8 million with Urban Forestry being given access to up to $104.5 million of that funding for forestry purposes ($48 million) and the Emerald Ash Borer program ($56.5 million), the remainder to support other environmental initiatives set out in this report.

 

11.       City Council transfer funds in the amount of $22,698.26 from the Termite Control Reserve (XQ0302) in Schedule 4 of Chapter 227 to Capital Financing Reserve (XQ XQ0011) in Schedule 1 of Chapter 227, and that Termite Control Reserve be closed and deleted from Chapter 227.

 

12.       City Council transfer the balance of the funds in the Vehicle Reserve – Revenue Services (XQ1600) in Schedule 1 of Chapter to the Vehicle and Equipment Replacement Reserve – Water/wastewater (XQ1012) in Schedule 2 in Chapter 227, and that the Vehicle Reserve – Revenue Services be closed and deleted from Chapter 227.

 

13.       City Council authorize the following actions with respect to the closing of the Utility Conservation/ Retrofit Reserve (XQ1711) in Schedule 1of Chapter 227:

 

a.         amend the funding of  the 2013 Facilities Management and Real Estate Capital Budget project - Building Automation System and Component Renewals (CCA207-26) – by replacing  $91,002 of funding from Capital from Current for reserve funding;

 

b.         fund this capital account from the Utility Conservation/Retrofit Reserve (XQ1711); and

 

c.         close the Reserve once all the funds have been expended and delete the Reserve from Chapter 227.

 

14.       City Council transfer funds in the amount of $1, 288,665.23 from the Enwave District Energy Reserve Fund (XR1059) in Schedule 7of Chapter 227 to the Toronto Water Capital Reserve Fund (XR6003) in Schedule 16 of Chapter 227, and that the Enwave District Energy Reserve Fund be closed and deleted from Chapter 227.

 

15.       City Council transfer funds in the amount of $99.89 from the Road Enhancement Reserve Fund (XR1401) in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227 to the Road and Sidewalk Repair, Maintenance and Reconstruction Reserve Fund (XR1402) in Schedule 8 of Chapter 227, and that Road Enhancement Reserve Fund be closed and deleted from Chapter 227.

 

16.       City Council transfer funds in the amount of $10,917.60 from the Parkland Acquisition-New Development (North York) Reserve Fund (XR2042) in Schedule 10 of  Chapter 227 to the Parkland Acquisition - North District Local Development Reserve Fund (XR2207)in Schedule 10 of Chapter 227, and that the Parkland Acquisition- New Development (North York) Reserve Fund be closed and deleted from Chapter 227.

 

17.       City Council transfer funds in the amount of $499,559.39 from the Infrastructure (Toronto) Reserve Fund (XR3014) in Schedule 15 of Chapter 227 to the Capital Financing Reserve (XQ0011) in Schedule 1 of Chapter 227, and that the Infrastructure (Toronto) Reserve Fund be closed and deleted from Chapter 227.

 

18.       City Council establish a discretionary reserve fund account called the "Toronto Transit Expansion Reserve Fund" in Schedule 7 of Chapter 227, the purpose of which will be to serve as a funding source to support transit expansion where the Provincial and/or the Federal Governments have committed to matching any City contribution to said Fund.

 

19.       City Council consider the annual contributions to the "Toronto Transit Expansion Reserve Fund" as part of the 2015 budget.

 

20.       City Council authorize staff to introduce of any necessary bills in Council.

Origin

(November 21, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report seeks Council's approval to implement a number of housekeeping amendments to the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 227 – Administration of Reserves and Reserve Funds ("Chapter 227").  These amendments include the establishment of new reserve funds, refinement of reserve and reserve fund criteria, and deletion of some accounts which are no longer required.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 21, 2013) Report with Appendices 1 to 3, from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Administrative Amendments to Reserve Fund Accounts - 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63982.pdf

EX36.16 - Letters of Understanding with City of Toronto Water - Exhibition Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve that the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place and the City of Toronto enter into Letters of Understanding with respect to the maintenance, repair and renewal of sewers and watermains located on the Exhibition Place grounds, and delegate authority to the Chief Executive Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water, to enter into such Letters of Understanding.

Origin

(November 22, 2013) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place

Summary

This report seeks approval of Letters of Understanding between the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place and the City of Toronto with respect to the maintenance, repair and renewal of sewers and watermains located on the Exhibition Place grounds.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 21, 2013) Report with Appendix A, from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place on Letters of Understanding with City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64027.pdf

16a - Letter of Understanding for Exhibition Place Infrastructure

Origin
(November 25, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water
Summary

This information report is supplementary to the report entitled "Letters of Understanding with City of Toronto Water" submitted to the Executive Committee and City Council by the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place with respect to the maintenance, repair and renewal of sewers and watermains located on the Exhibition Place grounds.

 

The General Manager, Toronto Water concurs with the recommendation contained in the report submitted by the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 25, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Letter of Understanding for Exhibition Place Infrastructure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64309.pdf

EX36.17 - 2014 Rate Supported Budgets - Toronto Water and 2014 Water and Wastewater Rates and Service Fees

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications EX36.17.3 to EX36.17.5 have been submitted on this item

Bills 1775, 1776 and 1777 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

Water Rates and Fees

 

1.         City Council approve:

 

a.         Effective January 1, 2014, the combined water and wastewater rates charged to metered consumers shall be as shown below and in Appendix B to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

Annual Consumption

Paid on or before the due date, $/m3

Paid after the due date, $/m3

Block 1 - All consumers, including Industrial consumption of first 6,000 m3 "Block 1 rate")

2.9579

3.1138

Block 2 - Industrial process – use water consumption over 6,000 m3, representing 30% reduction from the Block 1 Rate ("Block 2 rate')

2.0705

2.1795

 

b.         Effective January 1, 2014, the water and wastewater rates charged to flat rate consumers be increased by 9% to the rates shown in Appendix B to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

c.         Effective January 1, 2014, the water and wastewater service fees, including all fees to be transferred to Toronto Water from Engineering and Construction Services, formerly Technical Services, shall be as shown in Appendix C to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

d.         Effective January 1, 2014, Chapter 441 – Fees and Charges, Appendix D, Schedule 3, Wastewater Services be amended to include the new service fees for CCTV inspections of sewage works impacted by private construction, based on actual costs, and for sanitary discharge permits, as well as clarification of the existing minimum fees and fee basis for industrial waste surcharge agreements and permits and sanitary discharge agreements, as set out in Appendix D to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

e.         Effective January 1, 2014, Chapter 441 – Fees and Charges, Appendix D, Schedule 2, Water Services be amended to include a new fee of $75 for lost or damaged automated meter reading transmitters;

 

f.          Effective July 1, 2014, Chapter 441 – Fees and Charges, Appendix D, Schedule 2, Water Services be amended to include a new manual water meter reading fee of $80 per visit for consumers with water meters refusing to allow the installation of a new automatic water meter;

 

g.         Effective July 1, 2014, Chapter 441– Fees and Charges, Appendix D, Schedule 2, Water Services be amended to include a new flat rate legacy fee of $1,020 per year, which will be in addition to the existing flat rate fee, for residential flat rate consumers who refuse to allow the installation of an automatic water meter on their property;

 

h.         Effective September 1, 2014, Chapter 441– Fees and Charges, Appendix D, Schedule 2, Water Services be amended to include a new administrative fee of $50 for processing annual water supply backflow prevention device testing reports under the City's backflow prevention program.

 

2.         City Council approve, with respect to assistance for low-income seniors and low-income disabled persons, that:

 

a.         The rebate for eligible low-income seniors and low-income disabled persons be set at a rate of $0.8874 /m3, effective January 1, 2014, representing a 30% reduction from the Block 1 rate (paid on or before the due date).

 

3.         City Council make the necessary amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 441 - Fees and Charges, Municipal Code Chapter 849 - Water and Sewage Services and Utility Bill, and Municipal Code Chapter 681- Sewers, and any other necessary Municipal Code Chapters as may be required, to give effect to Recommendations 1 and 2 above.

 

4.         City Council authorize, effective July 1, 2014, the following amendments to Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, of the Toronto Municipal Code:

 

a.         Appendix D, Schedule 1, Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates, be amended to include a manual water meter reading fee of $80 per visit; and

 

b.         Appendix D, Schedule 1, Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates, be amended to include a flat rate legacy fee of $1,020 per year for residential flat rate consumers.

 

5.         City Council authorize, effective July 1, 2014, any other amendments to the Municipal Code to implement the above fees to water consumers who refuse or fail to allow access for the purposes of installing new water meters and associated meter reading equipment under the City's Water Meter Program.

 

6.         City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 681 - Sewers substantially in accordance with the draft By-law attached as Appendix A to the report (October 4, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water.

 

7.         City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 441 - Fees and Charges Schedule C, Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441 - Fees and Charges, Appendix D - Schedule 3, Wastewater Services, substantially in accordance with the draft By-law attached as Appendix B to the report (October 4, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water.

 

8.         City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 851 - Water Supply substantially in accordance with the draft By-law attached as Appendix C to the report (October 4, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water.

 

9.         City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to give consideration in 2015 and future years Toronto Water budgets to limiting Block 2 Customer water rate increases to a 3% rate increase, or a rate tied to the inflation rate, as a mechanism to use water as an economic driver to support business competitiveness in Toronto.

 

10.       City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water in Consultation with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to further consult with Industry stakeholders in 2014 as part of the consultation being undertaken under report EX35.11 "Future Options and Public Attitudes for Paying for Water, Wastewater and Stormwater Infrastructure and Services" and report back as part of the 2015 Budget submission on the following:

 

a.         Consideration of the potential to reduce the Block 2 threshold from 6000m3 to 5000m3 or an appropriate threshold that provides an opportunity for more value added manufacturing and production firms to become eligible for the block 2 rate;

 

b.         Consideration of the application of fixed cost component related to billing so as not to unfairly impact large water users;

 

c.         Consideration of other methods or models of financing as a potential source of capital funding for a new financing strategy with a view to minimizing rate increases as part of Toronto Water's 2015 Capital and Operating Budget Submission;

 

d.         Consideration of the re-introduction of the capacity buy-back program for Block 2 eligible customers to further support industry investing in their infrastructure.

 

11.       City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture in conjunction with the General Manager, Toronto Water to develop an enhanced communications and outreach strategy to with firms that are currently eligible for the Block 2 rate program but are not currently participating and advise them more broadly on how the City can help to support their growth and development in Toronto.

 

Capital Budget

 

12.       City Council approve the 2014 Recommended Capital Budget for Toronto Water with a total project cost of $968.676 million, and 2014 cash flow of $613.270 million and future year commitments of $2.580 billion comprised of the following:

 

a.         New Cash Flow Funding for:

 

i.          260 new / change in scope sub-projects with a 2014 total project cost of $968.676 million that requires cash flow of ($181.985 million) in 2014 and a future year cash flow commitment of $216.870 million in 2015; $324.884 million in 2016,  $314.215 million in 2017, $190.590 million in 2018, $85.214 million in 2019, ($8.734 million) in 2020; ($10.609 million) in 2021, ($13.921) million in 2022, and $52.152 million in 2023;

 

ii.         216 previously approved sub-projects with a 2014 cash flow of $657.198 million; and a future year cash flow commitment of $466.680 million in 2015; $301.777 million in 2016,  $208.576 million in 2017, $103.774 million in 2018, $100.886 million in 2019, $100.595 million in 2020; $76.240 million in 2021, and $70.880 million in 2022; and

 

b.         2013 approved cash flow for 151 previously approved sub-projects with carry forward funding from 2013 into 2014 totaling $138.057 million.

 

13.       City Council approve the 2015-2023 Recommended Capital Plan for Toronto Water totaling $5.915 billion in project estimates, comprised of $110.798 million in 2015; $241.121 million in 2016; $406.364 million in 2017; $694.490 million in 2018;  $817.183 million in 2019; $869.353 million in 2020; $941.077 million in 2021; $908.333 million in 2022; and $926.611 million in 2023, as amended by Recommendation 11.

 

14.       City Council amend, for future planning purposes, the draft Capital Plan to reflect a water rate increase of 8% in the years 2015, 2016 and 2017 and that staff report back during the 2015 Budget process on additional financing options.

 

15.       Council consider operating costs of $4.432 million net in 2014, ($0.370) million net in 2015; $0.175 million net in 2016; $5.709 million net in 2017; $5.875 million net in 2018; $0.365 million net in 2019; and $2.504 million net in 2020; and $0.050 million emanating from the approval of the 2014 Recommended Capital Budget for inclusion in the 2014 and future year operating budgets.

 

16.       City Council approve 6 temporary capital positions for the delivery of new 2014 capital projects and that the duration for each temporary position not exceed the life and funding of its respective project / sub-project.

 

17.       City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer in consultation with the General Manager, Toronto Water to advance the 2015 cashflow for the Basement Flooding project into 2014, should it become evident that greater than planned volume of work can be completed, and that the 2015 – 2023 budgeted cash flows be adjusted accordingly as part of the 2015 Budget process.

 

18.       City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to prioritize future Basement Flooding Protection Program studies based on the density of reported basement flooding complaints per sanitary sewer subsewershed for major storm events since 2000.  The density of reported basement flooding complaints will be calculated on the basis of the number of complaints of basement flooding received by the City divided by the land area serviced by the sanitary sewer subsewershed.

 

19.       City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to initiate and expedite the completion of new Environmental Assessment studies for Area 35 (Silver Creek subsewershed), Area 36 (Chapman subsewershed), Area 37 (Hillary subsewershed), Area 38 (Etobicoke Creek subsewershed), Area 39 (Berry Creek subsewershed), Area 40 (Forman-Yonge subsewershed), and Area 41 (North Mimico Creek subsewershed).

 

20.       City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water, to report back on the schedule of future Basement Flooding Protection Program study areas (for Study Area 42 and beyond), across the remainder of the city, as part of Toronto Water's  2015 Budget Submission.

 

21.       City Council request the General Manager, Toronto Water to report back in early 2014 on a coordinated, prioritized Toronto Water and Toronto Region Conservation Authority erosion control strategy and projects.

 

22.       City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, to increase the total subsidy available under the Basement Flooding Protection Subsidy Program from $3,200 to $3,400 per household by removing the combined subsidy for a backwater valve and sump pump for applications processed after January 2, 2014.

 

Operating Budget

 

23.       City Council approve the 2014 Recommended Operating Budget for Toronto Water of $403.163 million gross and $618.722 million in capital-from-current contribution, comprised of the following services:

 

 

Service:

Gross

($000s)

 

Capital Contribution

  ($000s)

 

Water Treatment & Supply

Wastewater Collection & Treatment

Stormwater Management

177,870.3

203,395.3

21,470.6

 

310,910.1

326,746.3

(18,934.0)

 

Total Program Budget

403,163.0

 

618,722.3

 

24.       City Council approve Toronto Water's 2014 proposed service levels, as outlined on page 7 of the 2014 Recommended Operating Budget (Analyst Notes) for Toronto Water, and the associated staff complement of 1,732.8, as amended by Recommendation 25.

 

25.       City Council, subject to adopting recommendation 14 which amends, for future planning purposes, the draft Capital Plan to reflect a water rate increase of 8% in the years 2015, 2016 and 2017, also amend the 2014 recommended operating budget for Toronto Water to include 2 additional staff and $0.200 million in gross expenditure increase and offsetting capital contribution reductions.

 

26.       City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water to report back on the results of the Water Loss and Leak Detection Program with an implementation plan, including estimated costs and benefits, in time for consideration with the 2015 Budget Process for Toronto Water.

 

27.       City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary Bills required to implement these recommendations, subject to any necessary refinements, including stylistic, format and organization, as may be identified by the City Solicitor and the General Manager, Toronto Water.

Origin

(November 12, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This report presents the recommended 2014 water and wastewater consumption rates and service fees arising from concurrent adoption of the recommended 2014 Toronto Water Operating and Capital Budgets.  Consistent with the funding strategy of 9% water rate increases until 2014, adopted by City Council in 2005, it is recommended that the Block 1 and Block 2 rates for all users and flat rate accounts be increased by 9% effective January 1st, 2014.  In addition, this report recommends inflationary fee increases for certain water and wastewater services, reflecting cost recovery for these services, and the introduction of the following new water and wastewater services fees: a minimum fee for sanitary discharge permits; a fee for CCTV inspections; a fee for lost or damaged automated meter reading transmitters; a manual water meter reading fee, an annual flat rate legacy fee for residential flat rate consumers and a fee related to the administration of the water supply backflow prevention program.  In addition, this report recommends the transfer of certain services fees to Toronto Water from Engineering and Construction Services, formerly Technical Services, related to routine disclosure record searches for Sewers By-law compliance violations and, also, the Ministry of the Environment Transfer of Review Program.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 12, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee on 2014 Water and Wastewater Rates and Service Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63940.htm
(October 30, 2013) Report with Appendix A from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on 2014 Water and Wastewater Rates and Service Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63895.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Appendix B
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63899.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Appendix C
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63900.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Appendix D
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63901.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Public Notice - 2014 Toronto Water Rates and Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63896.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Public Notice - Appendix A
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63897.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Public Notice - Appendix B
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63898.pdf
(November 1, 2013) 2014 Staff Recommended Capital Budget - Toronto Water (Analyst Notes)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63904.pdf
(November 1, 2013) 2014 Staff Recommended Operating Budget - Toronto Water (Analyst Notes)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63903.pdf
(October 29, 2013) 2014 Capital Budget Briefing Note #1 on Basement Flooding Protection Program — Project List: 2014 to 2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63902.pdf
(November 12, 2013) 2014 Capital Budget Briefing Note #2 on Permanent Restoration of Basement Flooding Protection Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63906.pdf
(November 12, 2013) 2014 Capital Budget Briefing Note #3 on Scenarios for Increasing the Water Rate and Adding Projects to the 2014-2023 Capital Budget
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63905.pdf
(November 12, 2013) Wrap-up Notes to Budget Commitee on 2014 - 2023 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63907.pdf
(November 12, 2013) Wrap up Notes to Budget Committee on 2014 Recommended Operating Budget
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63908.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Briefing Note #1 on 2014 Operating Budget Sewer Surcharge Rebate Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64562.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Briefing Note #2 on 2014 Operating Budget Water Rates and Business Competitiveness
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64566.pdf
(December 5, 2013) 2014 Rate Budget Wrap Up Notes to Executive Committee - Operating
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64569.pdf
(December 5, 2013) 2014 Rate Budget Wrap Up Notes to Executive Committee - Capital
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64570.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 5, 2013) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson (EX.New.EX36.17.1)
(December 4, 2013) E-mail from Barb Payne (EX.New.EX36.17.2)

Communications (City Council)

(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Barbara Payne (CC.New.EX36.17.3)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Barbara Payne (CC.New.EX36.17.4)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Melissa Chamlmers (CC.New.EX36.17.5)

17a - Update on the Water Meter Program

Origin
(October 21, 2013) Letter from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee
Summary

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on October 21, 2013, considered a report (October 4, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on “Update on the Water Meter Program”.

Background Information (Committee)
(October 21, 2013) Letter from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on Update on the Water Meter Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63909.pdf
(October 4, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Update on the Water Meter Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63910.pdf
(October 4, 2013) Appendix A - Water Meter Installation Progress by Ward - Account Status at August 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63911.pdf

17b - Amendments to the Sewers, Water Supply and Fees By-laws

Origin
(October 21, 2013) Letter from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee
Summary

This report proposes amendments to Chapter 681 (the “Sewers By-law”) and Chapter 851 (the “Water Supply By-law”) of the Municipal Code to update the documents with current practices and to meet the rapid pace of development in the City, including public transit development.

 

The recommended amendments to the Sewers By-law improves consistency of certain administrative provisions between the Sewers By-law and the Water Supply By-law, authorizes a single municipal sewer service connection to development projects where appropriate, improves the ability to trace damage to the City’s sewage works caused by construction-related activities, amends provisions associated with sanitary discharge permits, improves clarity by adding definitions and technical corrections, prohibits against furnishing false information and authorizes the General Manager, Toronto Water to enter into and execute any agreements or permits required under this Chapter.

 

The recommended amendments to the Water Supply By-law authorizes a single municipal water service connection to development projects where appropriate, allows for qualified in-house professionals employed by a company to perform the installation, testing, replacing or repairing of backflow prevention devices and provides clarification to Sector Categories.

 

Finally, recommended amendments within this report that impact fees will result in associated amendments within Municipal Code Chapter 441 – Fees and Charges.

Background Information (Committee)
(October 21, 2013) Letter from the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on Amendments to the Sewers, Water Supply and Fees By-laws
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63917.pdf
(October 4, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Amendments to the Sewers, Water Supply and Fees By-laws
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63913.pdf
(October 4, 2013) Appendix A - Draft Amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 681 - Sewers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63914.pdf
(October 4, 2013) Appendix B - Draft Amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 441 - Fees and Charges
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63915.pdf
(October 4, 2013) Appendix C - Draft Amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 851 - Water Supply
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63916.pdf

17c - Expansion of the Basement Flooding Protection Program's Priority Study Areas

Origin
(October 30, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water
Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise City Council on the expansion of the Basement Flooding Protection Program city wide, to include new study areas, including the budget impacts and the prioritization methodology for new study areas.  New study areas are recommended for initiation in 2014 and 2015, and for completion in 2016 and 2017.

 

On the afternoon and evening of July 8, 2013, severe thunderstorms and heavy rains flooded many parts of the City, causing damage to public and private property and infrastructure, stranding thousands of commuters, and leaving tens of thousands of residents and businesses without electricity.  More than 4,700 basement flooding complaints were received during and immediately following the storm.  Many of the impacted properties were located outside of the existing Basement Flooding Protection Program's 34 priority study areas resulting in the need to reconsider how basement flooding risks are assessed and addressed city wide.

Background Information (Committee)
(October 30, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water on Expansion of the Basement Flooding Protection Program's Priority Study Areas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63918.pdf

17d - Basement Flooding Remediation for Flood Plain Area Properties and Funding for the Source Water Protection Program

Origin
(October 18, 2013) Report from City Council
Summary

City Council on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013, adopted as amended, Executive Committee Item 34.4, on Impacts from the July 8, 2013 Storm Event on the City of Toronto. Among other things, City Council has requested the Executive Committee:

 

1.         as part of the Toronto Water 2014-2023 Capital Plan budget process, to consider the advancement of basement flooding remediation for those properties in floodplain areas of the City of Toronto.

 

2.         as part of the 2014 Toronto Water Capital Budget process, to give consideration to restoring full funding to the Source Water Protection Program.

Background Information (Committee)
(October 18, 2013) Report from City Council on Basement Flooding Remediation for Flood Plain Area Properties and Funding for the Source Water Protection Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63466.pdf

EX36.18 - 2014 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2014 Solid Waste Rates

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1792 has been submitted on this Item.

First item after PW27.3

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

Rates and Fees

 

1.         City Council adopt the 2014 Solid Waste Rates as set out in Appendix A to the report (October 23, 2013) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to become effective on January 1, 2014, as amended by Recommendation 3.

 

2.         City Council harmonize all rates for Agencies, Boards, Corporations, Divisions and School Boards to the Commercial rate with the increase to be phased in as follows:

 

a.         beginning January 1, 2014 by 25% of the difference between the Commercial  rates and the 2013 rates; beginning January 1, 2015 by 50% of the difference between the Commercial rates and the 2013 rates, beginning January 1, 2016 by 75% of the difference between the Commercial rates and the 2013 rates and beginning January 1, 2017 at 100% of the Commercial rates.

 

3.         City Council defer the introduction of new solid waste fees for charities scheduled for implementation in 2014 until 2015 so that more time can be given to transition strategies. 

 

4.         City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, in consultation with the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to consider a Grant Program for Charities, Institutions and Religious Organizations that demonstrate an inability to pay Solid Waste Management Services fees, and report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in the first quarter of 2014; such report to include eligibility criteria, appeals process, communications strategy and implementation plan.

 

5.         City Council introduce Tip fees for the disposal of recyclable materials and tire loads by Agencies, Boards, Corporations and Divisions and Schools at City of Toronto Transfer Stations to be phased in as follows:

 

a.         beginning January 1, 2014 at 25% of the Commercial rates, beginning  January 1, 2015 at 50% of the Commercial rates, beginning January 1, 2016 at 75% of the Commercial rates and beginning January 1, 2017 at 100% of the Commercial rates.

 

6.         City Council amend the rate structure for Agencies, Boards, Corporations and Divisions and School Boards curbside bin rates to an annualized rate by frequency to mirror all other curbside rate structures.

 

7.         City Council amend the rate structure for Residential Units Above Commercial Weekly Bag Only fee to mirror all other Residential Bag Only Fees.

 

8.         City Council introduce a fee for Premium Organics collection for Agencies, Boards, Corporations and Divisions and School Boards that mirrors the current Premium Organics collection fee for Commercial Customers.

 

9.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to negotiate and amend the Agreement between the City of Toronto and Rehrig Pacific Co., dated December 10, 2007 (in connection with Purchase Order No. 47013061) to allow for an additional $13 million for the supply and maintenance of garbage and recycling bins for residential and non-residential customers until November 30, 2017, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

10.       City Council to harmonize the “Gate Rate” Disposal Fees for Beneficial Materials, Industrial, Commercial and Institutional Waste (IC&I) and Municipal Solid Waste at Green Lane Landfill to mirror City Transfer Stations waste load fee.

 

11.       City Council increase various disposal fees at Green Lane Landfill as set out in Appendix A to the report (October 23, 2013) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

Capital Budget

 

12.       City Council approve the 2014 Recommended Capital Budget for Solid Waste Management Services with a total project cost of $49.521 million, and 2014 cash flow of $96.573 million and future year commitments of $252.009 million comprised of the following:

 

a.         New Cash Flow Funding for:

 

i.          33 new / change in scope sub-projects with a 2014 total project cost of $49.521 million that requires cash flow of $(25.355) million in 2014 and future year cash flow commitments of $39.612 million in 2015; $19.495 million in 2016; $9.770 million in 2017; $2.683 million in 2018; $0.117 million in 2019; $0.425 million in 2020; $0.009 million in 2021; $0.125 million in 2022 and $2.640 million in 2023;

 

ii.         35 previously approved sub-projects with a 2014 cash flow of $85.173 million; and future year cash flow commitments of $44.593 million in 2015; $33.391 million in 2016; $17.470 million in 2017; $18.137 million in 2018; $17.928 million in 2019; $16.591 million in 2020; $13.380 million in 2021 and $13.843 million in 2022;

 

iii.        13 sub-projects from previously approved projects with carry forward funding from 2012 and prior years requiring 2014 cash flow of $16.659 million which requires Council to reaffirm its commitment.

 

b.         2013 approved cash flow for 7 previously approved sub-projects with carry forward funding from 2013 into 2014 totaling $20.096 million; into 2015 totaling $0.900 million and into 2016 totaling $0.900 million.

 

13.       City Council approve new debt service costs of $0.738 million in 2014 and incremental debt costs of $5.334 million in 2015, $6.600 million in 2016; $5.047million in 2017; $6.296 million in 2018; $6.024 million in 2019; $5.347 million in 2020; $2.110 million in 2021; $1.807 million in 2022 and $1.828 million in 2023 resulting from the approval of the 2014 Recommended Capital Budget, to be included in the 2014 and future year operating budgets. 

 

14.       City Council approve the 2015-2023 Recommended Capital Plan for Solid Waste Management Services totaling $359.428 million in project estimates, comprised of $17.528 million in 2015; $17.831 million in 2016; $83.508 million in 2017; $83.752 million in 2018; $82.182 million in 2019; $17.496 million in 2020; $15.891 million in 2021; $14.290 million in 2022; and $27.220 million in 2023.

 

15.       City Council consider operating costs (savings) of $0.332 million net in 2014, $(2.784) million net in 2015; $(1.117) million net in 2016; $(0.513) million in 2017; $(0.103) million in 2018; $16.592 million in 2019; $(0.105) million in 2020; $(0.101) million in 2021; $(0.094) million in 2022; and $(0.098) million in 2023, emanating from the approval of the 2014 Recommended Capital Budget for inclusion in the 2014 and future year operating budgets.

 

16.       City Council reconfirm 9.5 temporary capital positions for the delivery of the previously approved capital subproject for the SSO Multi-Res Container Implementation project and that the duration for each temporary position not exceed the life and funding of its respective project / sub-project currently estimated to be 2015.

 

17.       City Council approve all sub-projects with third party financing conditionally, subject to the receipt of such funding in 2014 and/or future years.

 

18.       City Council request, pending completion of a capital asset condition assessment, the General Manager, Solid Waste Management, to consult with the Financial Planning Division to review the state of good repair of capital assets and report any changes as part of the 2015 Capital Budget process.

 

Operating Budget

 

19.       City Council approve the 2014 Recommended Operating Budget for Solid Waste Management Services of $354.236 million gross and $0 million net, comprised of the following services, as amended by recommendations 20 and 21:

 

Service:

Gross

($000)

 

Net

($000)

City Beautification

32,893.5

 

31,500.3

Residual Management

90,324.1

 

47,176.4

Solid Waste Collection & Transfer

140,765.7

 

(136,497.6)

Solid Waste Education & Enforcement

6,275.3

 

6,260.1

Solid Waste Processing & Transport

83,977.9

 

51,560.8

Total Program Budget

354,236.4

 

0.0

 

20.       City Council approve a zero net technical adjustment to the 2014 Operating Budget for Solid Waste Management Services reflecting a decrease to the Solid Waste Collection and Transfer Service Budget of $29.813 million gross and $20.227 million net and an equivalent increase to the Solid Waste Processing and Transport Service Budget of $29.813 million gross and $20.227 million net, arising from an adjustment to the allocation by service for expenditures and revenues associated with Transfer Station Operations.

 

21.       City Council approve additional zero net technical adjustments to the allocation by Services for the 2014 Operating Budget for Solid Waste Management Services reflecting increases to the City Beautification Service Budget of $0.013 million gross and net; and the Solid Waste Collection and Transfer Service Budget of $0.226 million gross and $0.308 million net, offset by decreases to the Solid Waste Processing and Transport Service Budget of $0.161 million gross and $0.243 million net; the Residual Management Service Budget of $0.024 million gross and net; and the Solid Waste Education and Enforcement Service Budget of $0.054 million gross and net.

 

22.       City Council approve Solid Waste Management Services' 2014 proposed service levels, as outlined on pages 7 to 16 of the 2014 Recommended Operating Budget (Analyst Notes) for Solid Waste Management Services, and the associated staff complement of 1,102.74.

 

23.       City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee prior to the 2015 budget process on the results of a study regarding price hedging agreements as a means of stabilizing, directly or indirectly, Solid Waste Management Services annual revenue from the sale of its recyclable materials.

 

24.       City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit the necessary bills to Council required to implement the above recommendations.

Origin

(November 12, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

This report outlines the recommended 2014 Solid Waste Rates arising from concurrent adoption of the 2014 Solid Waste Management Services Recommended Operating and Capital Budgets.  The recommended Rates include a 3% increase from the 2013 Rates as well as harmonizing all rates for Agencies, Boards, Corporations, Divisions, and Schools, to the Commercial rates, and recommending a slower phase in of fees for Charities, Institutions and Religious Organizations at 25% of the Commercial rates.

 

The expected revenue change from the recommended 3% increase on all Solid Waste Management rate fees is approximately $7.737 million.  The recommended 2014 Solid Waste Rates report balances fiscal constraints while maintaining critical progress on waste diversion initiatives, operational improvements and capital investments in state of good repair and new infrastructure.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 12, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee on 2014 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2014 Solid Waste Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63885.htm
(October 23, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Recommended 2014 Solid Waste Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63919.pdf
(October 23, 2013) Appendix A
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63926.pdf
(October 23, 2013) Appendix B
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63929.pdf
(October 23, 2013) Appendix C
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63931.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Public Notice - 2014 Solid Waste Management Services Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63921.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Public Notice - Appendix A
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63923.pdf
(November 1, 2013) 2014 Staff Recommended Capital Budget - Solid Waste Management (Analyst Notes)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63933.pdf
(November 1, 2013) 2014 Staff Recommended Operating Budget - Solid Waste Management (Analyst Notes)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63927.pdf
(November 12, 2013) Wrap-up Notes to Budget Commitee on 2014 - 2023 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63935.pdf
(November 12, 2013) Wrap-up Notes to Budget Committee on 2014 Recommended Operating Budget
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63937.pdf
(December 5, 2013) 2014 Rate Budget Wrap Up Notes to Executive Committee - Operating
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64571.pdf
(December 5, 2013) 2014 Rate Budget Wrap Up Notes to Executive Committee - Capital
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64572.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 16, 2013) Petition from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19 - Trinity-Spadina, headed "Let's Trash Charity Garbage Fees", containing the names of approximately 1,413 persons, filed during the routine matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)

EX36.19 - 2014 Rate Supported Budgets - Toronto Parking Authority

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

Capital Budget

 

1.         City Council approve the 2014 Recommended Capital Budget for the Toronto Parking Authority with a total project cost of $49.636 million, and 2014 cash flow of $57.015 million and future year commitments of $0.635 million comprised of the following:

 

a.         New Cash Flow Funding for:

 

i.          48 new / change in scope sub-projects with a 2014 total project cost of $49.636 million that requires cash flow of $49.001 million in 2014 and a future year cash flow commitment of $0.635 million in 2015.

 

b.         2013 approved cash flow for 7 previously approved sub-projects with carry forward funding from 2013 into 2014 totaling $8.014 million.

 

2.         City Council approve the 2015-2023 Recommended Capital Plan for the Parking Authority totaling $346.083 million in project estimates, comprised of $78.786 million in 2015; $49.260 million in 2016; $46.235 million in 2017; $34.312 million in 2018; $28.039 million in 2019; $22.568 million in 2020; $23.597 million in 2021; $30.127 million in 2022; and $33.159 million in 2023.

 

3.         City Council consider operating savings of $2.988 million net in 2015; and $2.966 million net in 2016, $0.460 million in 2017, $0.525 million in 2018, $0.534 million in 2019, $0.983 million in 2020, $1.260 million in 2021, $1.080 million in 2022, $1.470 million in 2023 emanating from the approval of the 2014 Recommended Capital Budget for inclusion in the 2014 and future year operating budgets.

 

4.         City Council approve all sub-projects with third party financing conditionally, subject to the receipt of such funding in 2014.

 

Operating Budget

 

5.         City Council approve the 2014 Recommended Operating Budget for the Toronto Parking Authority of $76.106 million gross and ($62,330) million net, comprised of the following services:

 

 

Service:

Gross

($000s)

 

Net

  ($000s)

On-Street Parking

Off- Street Parking

 

11,500.4

64,605.5

 

 

(41,674.3)

(20,655.5)

 

Total Program Budget

76,106.0

 

(62,329.8)

 

6.         City Council approve the Toronto Parking Authority's 2014 proposed service levels, as outlined on pages 7 and 8 of the 2014 Recommended Budget (Analyst Notes) for the Toronto Parking Authority, and the associated staff complement of 297.4.

Origin

(November 12, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The Budget Committee meeting to be held on November 6, 2013 will include consideration of the Toronto Parking Authority's 2014 Recommended Operating Budget; and the 2014 Recommended Capital Budget and 2015 – 2023 Recommended Capital Plan.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 12, 2013) Letter from the Budget Committee on 2014 Rate Supported Budgets - Toronto Parking Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63939.htm
(October 29, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Toronto Parking Authority - 2014 Recommended Operating Budget and 2014 - 2023 Capital Program - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63882.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Public Notice - 2014 Toronto Parking Authority Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63881.pdf
(November 1, 2013) 2014 Staff Recommended Capital Budget - Toronto Parking Authority (Analyst Notes)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63884.pdf
(November 1, 2013) 2014 Staff Recommended Operating Budget - Toronto Parking Authority (Analyst Notes)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63883.pdf
(November 12, 2013) Wrap-up Notes to Budget Commitee on 2014 - 2023 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63879.pdf
(November 12, 2013) Wrap-up Notes to Budget Committee on 2014 Recommended Operating Budget
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63880.pdf
(December 5, 2013) 2014 Rate Budget Wrap Up Notes to Executive Committee - Operating
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64573.pdf
(December 5, 2013) 2014 Rate Budget Wrap Up Notes to Executive Committee - Capital
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-64574.pdf

EX36.20 - Non-Union Employees, Accountability Officers and Elected Officials Benefits Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize staff  to enter into agreements with pharmacists (persons issued a certificate of accreditation to operate a pharmacy pursuant to the Drug and Pharmacies Regulation Act) selected based on criteria, including but not limited to those factors described in Appendix C to the report (September 12, 2013) from the City Manager, as determined by the Director of Pension, Payroll and Employee Benefits and the Executive Director of Human Resources in consultation with the City Solicitor’s Office for the purpose of implementing a Preferred Provider Network of pharmacists and to negotiate terms and conditions satisfactory to the City, with a focus on reducing the administrative costs associated with dispensing drugs, for implementation in 2014.

 

2.         City Council direct the Director of Pension, Payroll and Employee Benefits to undertake discussions with the City's benefits carrier, Manulife Financial, to identify and evaluate initiatives to further manage drug costs within the  context of the existing traditional benefit plan and to report back to the Employee and Labour Relations Committee with recommendations in the first half of 2014.

Origin

(October 18, 2013) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee

Summary

This report summarizes the results of a comprehensive review of the City's benefits plan for non-union employees, accountability officers and elected officials and recommends changes to the plan focussing on cost effective ways of delivering benefits.

 

Employee benefits are an integral part of an employees' total compensation package.  As such, the City is committed to providing a fair and comprehensive plan that is fiscally responsible to the taxpayers of Toronto while continuing to follow industry standards and best practices.  Prior to 2009, benefit costs were escalating at a rate of 10% annually.  Since that time staff  have made a concerted effort to contain benefit costs through administrative and plan design changes, including cost containment initiatives negotiated through the collective bargaining process.  As a result of these efforts, health and dental benefit costs decreased by -7% in 2012 and are anticipated to decrease by an additional -6% in 2013.

 

The changes recommended in this report will further assist the City in continuing to control benefit costs while ensuring that the plan remains equitable and competitive as part of the total compensation package used to attract and retain diverse and highly skilled employees.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 18, 2013) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Non-Union Employees, Accountability Officers and Elected Officials Benefits Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63444.htm
(September 12, 2013) Report with Appendices A to C, from the City Manager on Non-Union Employees, Accountability Officers and Elected Officials Benefits Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-62720.pdf

Declared Interests (Committee)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Peter Milczyn - as his wife is a non-union employee of the City of Toronto.

EX36.21 - Occupational Health and Safety Report 2nd Quarter and Year-to-Date 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (August 27, 2013) from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources, for information.

Origin

(October 18, 2013) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee

Summary

This report provides information on the status of the City’s health and safety system, specifically on activities, priorities and performance during and up to the end of the second quarter of 2013.

 

There was a 19.8% decrease in the number of lost time injuries (LTIs), a 43.1% decrease in the number of recurrences and a 4.0% decrease in the number of medical aid only injuries during the first two quarters of 2013 relative to 2012.  

 

Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) invoiced costs for the first two quarters period of 2013 were $12.5 Million.  This was $500K lower than for the same first two quarters period of 2012. This decrease was achieved despite the significant increase in the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board's Schedule II Employer administration rate that increased from 27.6% in 2012 to 35.8% for 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 18, 2013) Letter from the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on Occupational Health and Safety Report 2nd Quarter and Year-to-Date 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63445.htm
(August 27, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the Executive Director, Human Resources on Occupational Health and Safety Report 2nd Quarter and Year-to-Date 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-62714.pdf
Appendix A - Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) Incidents (January - June), by Division
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-62715.pdf
Appendix B - Lost Time Injury (LTI) Frequency (January - June)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-62716.pdf
Appendix C - Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) Costs for All Firm Numbers (2009-2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-62717.pdf
Appendix D(i) - Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) Invoiced Costs to End of 2nd Quarter (<$50,000)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-62718.pdf
Appendix D (ii) - Workplace Safety and Insurance Board (WSIB) Invoiced Costs by Division (>$50,000)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-62719.pdf

EX36.22 - City of Toronto News Release Boilerplate

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Manager to change the City of Toronto news release boilerplate to the following:

 

“Toronto is Canada's largest city, sixth-largest government and home to a diverse population of about 2.8 million people. Toronto is one of the best cities in the world to do business, consistently ranked at or near the top in global competitiveness, innovation, entrepreneurship and quality of life. Toronto is proud to be the Host City of the 2015 Pan American and Parapan American Games, the world's third largest multi-sport Games. For information on non-emergency City services and programs, visit www.toronto.ca, call 311, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, or follow us on twitter @torontocomms.”

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Report from City Council

Summary

City Council on November 13, 14, 15 and 18, 2013, referred Administrative Inquiry IA41.1 from Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22, St. Paul’s, regarding the City of Toronto News Release Boilerplate and Answer IA41.1a from the City Manager, to the Executive Committee for consideration.

 

Councillor Josh Matlow has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

“I am submitting this administrative inquiry under Municipal Code S27-61 to seek information regarding the status of the boilerplate that is included with each City of Toronto news release.

 

In November of last year, I wrote to the City Manager requesting that this boilerplate be revised to remove the inappropriately ideological, partisan, and politically aspirational (rather than factual) content which purports to speak for City Council without the authority to do so. Rather than serving as a political weathervane, the official boilerplate describing our city ought to reflect the fundamental characteristics and qualities of Toronto that we can all agree on.

 

A spokesperson from Strategic Communications announced in January that they were working to revise the paragraph to make it more factual and to reflect, for example, that Toronto will be hosting the Pan Am Games in 2015. And yet, several months later, there has been no apparent progress. There was also a suggestion by Strategic Communications at the time that this progress was being held up by a member of the mayor’s office even though there is no authority given to the mayor’s office to prescribe the City of Toronto’s news release boilerplate.

 

I am requesting answers to the following questions:

 

1.         Why does each news release from the City of Toronto continue to include the inappropriate boilerplate despite staff’s stated intention to revise it?

 

2.         What is the course of action that City Council can take to support the intention of Strategic Communications to revise the City of Toronto’s news release boilerplate to ensure it is factual and asserts what we all value about our city rather than being ideological, partisan or politically aspirational?”

Background Information (Committee)

(November 19, 2013) Report from City Council on City of Toronto News Release Boilerplate
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63959.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow addressed to the City Clerk on Administrative Inquiry regarding City of Toronto New Release Boilerplate
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63942.pdf
(November 8, 2013) Letter from the City Manager in response to Administrative Inquiry from Councillor Josh Matlow on Administrative Inquiry regarding City of Toronto New Release Boilerplate
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-63943.pdf

Board of Health - Meeting 25

HL25.4 - Exploring Health and Social Impacts of Climate Change in Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
See also Item PE24.3

Board Recommendations

The Board of Health recommends that City Council consider the report (October 21, 2013) from the Medical Officer of Health titled "Exploring Health and Social Impacts of Climate Change in Toronto" in combination with the report from the Chief Corporate Officer on adaptation activities and capital plans across the City of Toronto.

Board Decision Advice and Other Information

The Board of Health:

 

1.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health, in consultation with the Director of the Environment and Energy Division, Office of the Chief Corporate Officer, to carry out a climate and health vulnerability assessment for the City of Toronto.

 

2.         Forwarded the report (October 21, 2013) from the Medical Officer of Health to the Parks and Environment Committee to be considered at the meeting of December 6, 2013 together with the report from the Chief Corporate Officer on adaptation activities and capital plans across the City of Toronto.

 

3.         Requested that the report (October 21, 2013) from the Medical Officer of Health and its recommendations be forwarded to City Council for consideration at its  December 16 and 17, 2013 meeting.

Origin

(October 21, 2013) Report from the Medical Officer of Health

Summary

Over the coming decades, climate change in Toronto is expected to be characterized by more extreme weather events including extreme heat and severe rainstorms. This report provides an overview of potential health impacts identified in the published research including: more illness and death from extreme heat, poor air quality, and vector-borne disease; more injury and illness arising from flooding of homes and businesses; and impacts on mental health. Increases in extreme weather could also have significant impacts on factors that indirectly affect health including food security, social networks, employment status, quality of housing, income and costs of recovery, and access to core services including electricity, transportation, and telecommunications.

 

Information specific to Toronto about the current burden of illness from climate-related health impacts is varied. No systematic evaluation has been completed to estimate how climate change might alter these risks and their health impact, characterize the numbers and characteristics of vulnerable people and places for the combination of these risks, or consider the resulting demand on public health and health care services.

 

A comprehensive assessment of Toronto's vulnerability to health and social impacts of climate change is needed to support efficient, effective service delivery and protection of health in a changed climate. With the appropriate information and partnerships in place, TPH will be able to identify opportunities for strengthening the resilience of Toronto's population, especially the most vulnerable groups.

Background Information (Board)

(October 21, 2013) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on Exploring Health and Social Impacts of Climate Change in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-62786.pdf

Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 25

CD25.1 - Results of the Fire Insurance Grades Study

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee forwards the item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

This report responds to Council's request for the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services (TFS) to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on what would be required to move the commercial and residential fire rating to the same level as single family homes.

 

The Fire Underwriters' Survey (FUS) results of 2012 determined the Public Fire Protection Classification (PFPC) of the City of Toronto to be a Class 4, representing a downgrade from Class 3 as determined in the 2002 survey. The change from PFPC Class 3 to Class 4 would adversely affect insurance rates.

 

To prevent the change in PFPC, the City of Toronto requested a grace period of twelve months to implement measures of improved fire protection capacity, fire prevention measures and risk reduction measures that would address the classification change.

 

TFS requested FUS review opportunities for improving the City of Toronto PFPC from Class 4 to Class 3, from Class 3 to Class 2, and from Class 2 to Class 1. In October 2013, FUS provided a final report addressing the potential changes in the PFPC and provided options to facilitate the improvement in the PFPC which include the use of additional fire fighters assigned to fire fighting apparatus and the distribution and type of fire fighting apparatus, enhancements to the Fire Prevention Division with increased scheduled annual fire prevention inspections, increased pre-incident planning, and, enhanced response systems and emergency communications.

 

TFS has reviewed the options and associated costs as outlined by FUS. TFS strategies to improve the City of Toronto PFPC are outlined in this report

Background Information (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager on Results of the Fire Insurance Grades Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-64003.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-64004.pdf

Speakers

Ed Kennedy, Toronto Professional Fire Fighters Association
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Sarah Doucette

CD25.2 - Provision/Expansion of Proprietary Emergency Medical Services Communication Centre Medical Priority Dispatch System

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Chief, Emergency Medical Services  to negotiate and enter into a contract with Priority Dispatch Corporation for the amount of $1,081,595.00 (USD) net of HST, to provide additional licences for the Medical Priority Dispatch System, certification training and quality assurance professional services for a period of 5 years from the date of the agreement, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief, Emergency Medical Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(November 18, 2013) Report from the Chief, Emergency Medical Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to enter into a single source contract with Priority Dispatch Corporation, who is the current vendor providing Toronto Emergency Medical Services (TEMS) Central Ambulance Communications Centre (CACC) with the Medical Priority Dispatch System, in the total amount of $1,081,595.00 (USD) net of HST, $1,100,631.07 (USD) net of HST recoveries, for a period of 5 years from the effective date of the agreement.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with Municipal Code By-law Chapter 195- Purchasing, where the current request has exceeded the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five year commitment limit under Section 1 of the Purchasing By-Law and also exceeds the threshold of $500,000, net of HST allowed under staff authority as per the Toronto Municipal Code By-law, Chapter 71 – Financial Control.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2013) Report from the Chief, Emergency Medical Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division on Provision/Expansion of Proprietary EMS Communication Centre Medical Priority Dispatch System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-63856.pdf

CD25.3 - Full-Day Kindergarten Implementation Updates 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that :

 

1.         the General Manager, Children's Services continue to reinvest savings resulting from implementation of Full Day Kindergarten (FDK) into areas of greatest need and the creation of spaces for younger children in accordance with the Child Care Service Plan principles, including those of age and geographical equity.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee requested the General Manager, Children's Services to consider maintaining existing wage subsidy for re-configured childcare programs serving younger children in her upcoming report on new provincial funding.

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Children’s Services

Summary

This report provides a status update on the transition of the early years system prior to the final year of Full-Day Kindergarten (FDK) implementation.  Children's Services Division has been reporting on the transition plan over the past four years.  This report provides more details on access to quality FDK before- and after- school programs, wage subsidy recalculations, and operators' interest in providing a supervised lunch program as part of FDK before- and after-school programs. 

 

In order to support families through FDK implementation,  Children's Services continues to work with school boards, child care operators and their boards of directors, families and other stakeholders to ensure success of the ongoing transition plan.  In its capacity as Consolidated Municipal Service Manager, the Division has put in place a variety of grant-based funding initiatives to assist operators with the transition.  The report reviews these initiatives and the criteria used in the allocation of resources. 

Background Information (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Children’s Services on Full-Day Kindergarten Implementation Updates 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-63941.pdf

Speakers

Lisa Winters, Beatty Buddies Child Care
Cathy O'Toole, Plains RD Child Care
Jane Mercer, Toronto Coalition for Better Child Care
Councillor Janet Davis

CD25.5 - Designating Community Centres Where Programs are Free (Priority Centres)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council refer the designation of 16 existing community centres, as community centres where programs are free (formerly known as Priority Centres), effective April 2014, as outlined in the report (November 20, 2013) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and as per the approved selection criteria in the Recreation Service Plan, to the 2014 budget process for consideration.

 

2.         City Council direct that free programming continue to be provided at existing Priority Centres in Toronto Community Housing revitalization areas, and delay the review of their designation until after two Census cycles (approximately 10 years) following the revitalization's completion.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee requested:

 

1.         the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Budget Committee on the program and budget implications of the implementation of 16 new Centres Where Services Are Free (priority centres), starting in (a) the Spring or (b) the summer 2014 session;

 

2.         the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report periodically on service and program levels in all Centres Where Services Are Free during the 2014 year;

 

3.         the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation  to report to the Budget Committee on the budget and program implications of implementing the "Swim to Survive" program as early as practicable in 2014; and

 

4.         the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the Budget Committee on the possibility of funding the "Swim to Survive" Program through the Pan Am Games legacy Fund.

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

Toronto City Council adopted Parks, Forestry and Recreation's 2013-2017 Recreation Service Plan in November 2012. The Plan will guide the City of Toronto's planning and delivery of recreation programs and services over the next five years. Council approved the Implementation Plan in July 2013.

 

The City of Toronto currently has 23 Priority Centres where recreation programs are free. These centres reduce financial barriers for Toronto's low-income families.

 

This report recommends designating 16 existing community centres as new Priority Centres following the approved 2013-2017 Recreation Service Plan. It also addresses the need for special considerations for revitalization areas.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Report with Appendices A and B from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on Designating Community Centres Where Programs are Free (Priority Centres)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-63957.pdf

Speakers

Mark J. Richardson (Submission Filed)
Terry Knox Mariano Magbanua, Advocacy Director, Toronto Youth Cabinet

Communications (Committee)

(December 4, 2013) Letter from Community Recreation for All (CD.New.CD25.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/comm/communicationfile-42135.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Submission from Mark J. Richardson (CD.New.CD25.5.2)

CD25.7 - Provincial Health System Funding Reform Related to Long-Term Care Homes and Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:                            

 

1.         City Council urge the provincial government to meet the urgent need for additional resources to adequately care for the frail elderly and other vulnerable individuals served by the long-term care sector by increasing operating funding by $4.00 per resident day.

 

2.         City Council request that the provincial government ensure health system funding reform results in funding equity by making an investment of at least $2.00 per resident day to mitigate the impact of redistributing supplementary funding streams between long-term care homes.

 

3.         City Council ask the provincial government to increase the long-term care home construction per diem by $4.20 per resident day; and

 

4.         City Council direct that the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(October 24, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services

Summary

This report provides an update on provincial Health System Funding Reform (HSFR) related to Long-Term Care Homes and Services (LTCHS) and informs Council about the potential impact of pending funding policy changes currently under review by the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (MOHLTC).  It also seeks City Council support in urging the provincial government to provide an adequate level of operating and construction funding and to ensure all funds are distributed equitably across the entire long-term care sector.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 24, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services on Provincial Health System Funding Reform related to Long-Term Care Homes and Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-63961.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 4, 2013) Letter from Tim Maguire, President, CUPE Local 79 (CD.New.CD25.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/comm/communicationfile-42063.pdf

CD25.8 - Long-Term Care Homes and Services Capital Renewal Strategy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve in principle the Long-Term Care Homes and Services recommended capital renewal plan and authorize the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services, to undertake the necessary due diligence required to proceed with planning based on the framework and strategy as outlined in this report.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services to report back on the status of the overall Long-Term Care Homes and Services capital renewal plan and financing requirements as part of the George Street Revitalization Project by the second quarter of 2015 in consultation with the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

 

3.         City Council direct that, as a prerequisite, any plan that is presented ensures that no hostel bed is lost either for the long term or for the construction period, and that the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services work with the General Manager, Shelter, Housing and Support to this end.

 

4.         City Council request the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care to provide enhanced program and funding support to help enable the placement of hard-to-serve special populations, such as the vulnerable individuals currently being served at Seaton House, into a long-term care home.

 

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services

Summary

Long-Term Care Homes and Services (LTCHS) has developed a capital renewal strategy to address the mandatory redevelopment of five (5) of its long-term care homes.  As directed by City Council on July 16, 2013 in the report "Update and Next Steps of Proposed Redevelopment of Seaton House and Revitalization of George Street", LTCHS is reporting back on how the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) redevelopment of Seaton House and revitalization of George Street can be integrated into LTCHS' overall capital renewal strategy and service plan to more effectively address the needs of an aging vulnerable population in downtown Toronto.

 

This report seeks authorization for LTCHS to proceed with its capital renewal planning based on the proposed framework, which includes integrating and co-locating services as part of the George Street Revitalization (GSR) Project. The capital renewal strategy has been developed within the context of the City's current long-term care bed inventory.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services on Long-Term Care Homes and Services Capital Renewal Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-63886.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-63887.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 4, 2013) Letter from Dr. Stephen Hwang (CD.New.CD25.8.1)

CD25.10 - 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (CD25.10 for information)

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework attached to the report (November 20, 2013) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration by adding the following two strategic directions: 

 

a.         "Strategic Direction 8.             

 

Continuing to Maintain a Strong Emergency Shelter System

 

The City recognizes its responsibility to provide emergency shelter as the last resort to all who need a bed.  This entails (a) achieving a 90% occupancy standard and (b) building a shelter system with community partners that achieve high shelter standards."

 

b.         "Strategic Direction 9.             

 

Advocate to other orders of Government to develop new housing and provide homeless-related operating funds."

 

2.         City Council adopt the attached 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework, as amended by Recommendation 1 above; and

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to provide a progress report on implementation of the service planning framework to the first meeting of Community Development and Recreation Committee in the next term of Council.

 

4.         City Council re-iterate its request to the Province of Ontario and the Federal Government demonstrate its commitment to its Long Term Affordable Housing Strategy by increasing the amount of funding for affordable and social housing and homelessness prevention programs and services to a level recognizes the high level of need in the City of Toronto.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee:

 

1.         Directed the General Manager of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to expedite the consultation with women's homeless service providers and stakeholders on the feasibility of establishing a 24-hour safe drop-in for women and/or a women-only low-barrier harm reduction shelter and review existing services and available funding for Capital Improvements and report back to the January 21st, 2014 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee on their consultation.

 

2.         Directed the General Manager of Shelter, Support, and Housing Administration to consult with the Red Cross and report back on the feasibility of creating a 24-hour "warming centres" during Extreme Cold Alerts, parallel to summer time cooling centres at Metro Hall and report to the December 16, 2013 meeting of City Council on an implementation process.

 

3.         Directed the General Manager of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to establish a multi-sectoral advisory committee beginning in the first quarter of 2014 that will:

 

i.          Review and provide advice on the development of indicators and an implementation plan and timeline for the Housing Stability Service Plan.

 

ii.         Provide guidance and advice on the development of improved mandatory training for all homelessness front-line, maintenance and management staff on ensuring equitable access and an inclusive space for LGBTQ and Aboriginal communities.

 

iii.        Provide guidance and advice on the development of improved mandatory training on providing trauma-focused care to homeless service users.

 

iv.        Be co-chaired by a representative from the homelessness community sector.

 

v.         Include representation from past or present shelter users.

 

vi.        Report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on the process to establish the Committee and its action plan.

 

4.         Requested the General Manager, Shelter, Support, Housing and Administration to appoint a working group made up of existing organizations: Supporting Our Youth, The 519 Community Centre, Planned Parenthood, Covenant House, The Wellesley Institute, The Homeless Hub, St. Michael's Hospital Centre for Research on Inner City Health and the AIDS Committee of Toronto, and other relevant stakeholders to research, better understand and develop a working plan to address the overrepresentation of LGBTQ individuals in the homeless youth population and on the creation of a specialized transitional housing for LGBQT youth and report back to the August 20, 2014 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee.

  

5.         Requested the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report in the second quarter of 2014 on the options for a LGBTQ youth focused shelter or transitional housing.

 

The General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administation made a  presentation to the Committee.

 

The Community Development and Recreation Committee considered Items CD25.10 and CD25.11 together.

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report seeks Council approval of the attached 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework. This framework will guide Shelter, Support, and Housing Administration (SSHA) and its partners in the planning, management and delivery of SSHA's full range of housing and homelessness services over the next five years. It is intended to support the transformation of these housing and homelessness services from a loose network of programs primarily focused on the administration of social housing and emergency responses to homelessness into an integrated, client-centered, outcome-focused service system that improves the ability of residents to achieve greater housing stability.

 

The catalyst for development of this service planning framework was the combination of a tightening funding environment, demand pressures on existing services, and changes to provincial and federal programs and reporting expectations. These included: the introduction by the Province of the Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI) in January 2013, which consolidated funding from five homelessness prevention programs into one program with greater flexibility to meet local needs but with less overall funding; and the renewal of the federal Homelessness Partnering Strategy (HPS) that focuses on Housing First approaches. This framework is consistent with Council's ten year plan for affordable housing (Housing Opportunities Toronto) and Toronto Housing Charter, and supports the implementation of CHPI and HPS. 

 

The preparation of the service planning framework was informed by research, a review of best practices in other jurisdictions as well as extensive community consultation undertaken by SSHA during 2013.  During the summer, SSHA consulted with a range of service providers, service users and other stakeholders using a variety of different methodologies. 

 

The service planning framework sets out seven strategic directions to guide SSHA over the next five years. It outlines SSHA's current responsibilities and key actions the division will undertake going forward to improve service delivery, increase service access, foster system stewardship, and strengthen partnerships to prevent and reduce homelessness while creating housing opportunities. 

Background Information (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-64006.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Attachment 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-64008.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Presentation from General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-64563.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 16, 2013) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Response to Extreme Cold Weather Alerts (CD25.10a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64903.pdf

Speakers

Sarah Blackstock
Alex Abramovich, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE)
Linsey MacPhee, Manager, Toronto Drop-in Network
Keith Hambly, Toronto HIV/AIDS Network (THN)
Christian Hui, Toronto HIV/Aids Network
Said Dirie, Housing Action Now
Dr. Stephen Hwang, Centre for Research on Inner City Health
Brian Bourdieu, Street Person
Susan Gapka
Councillor Janet Davis

CD25.12 - The 519 Sport and Recreation Project

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that :

 

1.         City Council request the Executive Director of Social Development, Finance and Administration to work with the donor, The 519 Centre, Waterfront Toronto, Real Estate Services, and City Planning to develop an overall project proposal;

 

2.         City Council authorize staff to enter into negotiations with Infrastructure Ontario to acquire the project site, and report back to Council with respect to the results of those negotiations; and

 

3.         City Council direct the Executive Director of Social Development, Finance and Administration to establish a working group with The 519, City Legal, Real Estate Services, and City Planning (Waterfront Secretariat and Community Planning) and Ward Councillor to develop the parameters for an interim Development Board to manage The 519 Athletic Centre project.

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and Executive Director, The 519 Community Centre

Summary

The 519 Church Street Community Centre (The 519), with the support of a major philanthropic donor, is proposing to build the first ever LGBTQ-focused sports and recreation centre in Toronto. This landmark recreation facility will establish an international best practice for LGBTQ engagement in recreation and offer a range of spaces for community activities and athletic programming. The proposed facility will also meet a service requirement for the West Don Lands community. The facility will be developed and governed by The 519 Community Centre, in keeping with their dual mandate of responding to the needs of the local community and communities of common bond. As with other AOCC (Association of Community Centres) facilities, as part of The 519,  this facility will be managed in accordance with the City of Toronto's Relationship Framework for AOCCs.

 

It is proposed that the centre will be built on the Wheel and Foundry complex site located at Eastern Avenue and St. Lawrence Street, adjacent to Corktown Commons. The site is currently owned by Infrastructure Ontario. The area is under construction as it will host the Athletes Village for the 2015 Pan American / Parapan American Games.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and Executive Director, The 519 Community Centre on The 519 Sport and Recreation Project
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-63986.pdf

Speakers

Susan Gapka
Brian De Matos
Councillor Pam McConnell

Communications (Committee)

(December 2, 2013) E-mail from John P Wilson (CD.New.CD25.12.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cd/comm/communicationfile-42024.pdf

Economic Development Committee - Meeting 27

ED27.1 - State of Manufacturing in Toronto (Collaborating for Competitiveness - Implementation Action 5)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to convene a Toronto manufacturing business roundtable as generally described in this report, to be held in Q1 2014, focussed on identifying issues and opportunities related to enhancing Toronto’s competitiveness for manufacturers, and report back to Economic Development Committee on this consultation in Q2 2014.

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as part of ongoing business outreach activity, to proactively identify Toronto manufacturing companies seeking global product mandates, and work with the proponents, other City Divisions and the appropriate agencies, including Invest Toronto and Provincial/Federal orders of government, as required, to help accelerate these investment opportunities.

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to work in partnership with the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and representatives from manufacturing business, labour and academia to identify Toronto manufacturing sector recruitment, skills and workforce training needs, concentrating on base skills that are transferable, and to identify a range of preliminary opportunities to connect jobseekers, educators, trainers, and employers. 

 

4.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to collaborate with Invest Toronto and others to prepare a manufacturing focussed investment opportunity package, profiling Toronto's advantages for manufacturing business and identifying available sites and/or projects in Toronto along with the supporting ecosystem components.

 

5.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back to Economic Development Committee in Q1 2015 with the next annual report on the state of manufacturing in Toronto, in the form of a 'dashboard' report providing an update on key indicators related to manufacturing activity in Toronto and to report on the impacts of supportive measures taken in 2013 and 2014.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

a.         Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back to the Economic Development Committee on the state of job creation incubation programs in the City and on how the City can provide or expand the incubation program for newcomers.

Origin

(October 5, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

As part of its endorsement of the Collaborating for Competitiveness economic growth and job creation strategy, City Council has directed the preparation of an annual report on the state of manufacturing in Toronto to keep a special focus on this high value sector. 

 

This report highlights key trends in manufacturing in Toronto and in the broader context, speaks to the significance of manufacturing in Toronto’s economic and employment landscape, identifies key issues and challenges, provides an overview of current City initiatives to support manufacturing, and presents potential future directions to enhance support for manufacturing in Toronto.

 

While manufacturing in Toronto, as elsewhere, has experienced significant decreases both in the number of firms and the number of jobs, reflecting a variety of economic forces, it remains a crucial part of Toronto’s economic landscape.  Manufacturing has not left entirely.  Toronto’s manufacturing firms employ almost 120,000 people representing 9 percent of Toronto’s total employment.  Manufacturing creates quality jobs, has high economic multipliers, and needs to be recognized and supported as a component of a strong and balanced economy with good growth prospects. 

 

In an increasingly competitive global economy, Toronto manufacturers face challenges and pressures that require them to have a stable yet flexible, cost-competitive and supportive operating environment, so they can survive, innovate and expand.  With focussed and collaborative efforts, Toronto is well positioned to capitalize on its unique advantages and on the strengths of its diverse manufacturing sector, to build on emerging trends, to position the sector for growth and to continue to enhance the health and vitality of this important sector.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 5, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the State of Manufacturing in Toronto (Collaborating for Competitiveness - Implementation Action 5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63621.pdf
(October 1, 2012) Attachment No. 1 - The Structure of Manufacturing and Warehouse Sector Employment by Locality, 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63622.pdf

Speakers

Paul Scrivener, Director of External Relations, Toronto Industry Network (Submission Filed)
John Humphrey, United Steelworkers Toronto Area Council
John Cartwright, President, Toronto & York Region Labour Council

Communications (Committee)

(November 19, 2013) Letter from Fred Granek, President, Canadian Centre for Pollution Prevention (C2P2) (ED.New.ED27.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/comm/communicationfile-41481.pdf
(November 22, 2013) Letter from Paul Scrivener, Director of External Relations, The Toronto Industry Network (ED.New.ED27.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/comm/communicationfile-41793.pdf
(November 22, 2013) Letter from Heather Marshall, DeTOx Toronto Campaigner, Toronto Environmental Alliance (ED.New.ED27.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/comm/communicationfile-41794.pdf

ED27.2 - Toronto Music Sector (Collaborating for Competitiveness - Implementation Action 6)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Economic Development and Culture has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (ED27.2a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals, including municipal or local board employees

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Terms of Reference attached to the report (November 18, 2013) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture in Appendix A for the proposed Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council as follows:

  

A.           Delete Section E (1) f. in Appendix A and insert the words:

 

"E (1) f.            representative(s) from a pool of four independent artists"

 

B.           Delete Section E (1) g. in Appendix A and insert the following:

 

"E (1) g.           15 music industry stakeholders collectively representing a range of knowledge, skills and experience in the following areas:

 

i. Events and Venues

• Venues
• Festivals
• Promoters
• Production Management

 

ii. Artist and Business Management, Representation and Marketing
• Booking Agents
• Talent Development Firms
• Artist Management

 

iii. Music Creation
• Recording Studios
• Mastering Studios
• Recording and Distribution Labels
• Publishers

 

iv. Associations, Organizations and Partners
• Trade Associations
• Unions and Guilds
• Educational and Training Institutions
• Artist Associations

• Music Awards Programs

              •Media and Broadcasting

              •Music Technology (i.e. software developers, digital, etc.)

             •Retail and Distribution

 

The membership should reflect the diversity of Toronto's music industry, music genres, and population and balance representation from independents and majors.  Consideration should be given to members with out of market (national and/or international) experience and connections."

 

2.         City Council adopt, as amended by Recommendation 1, the Terms of Reference attached to the report (November 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture for the proposed Toronto Music Industry Council.

 

3.         City Council request the Striking Committee to recommend the Councillor-at-large member appointment to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council.

 

4.         City Council endorse the draft Framework and Terms of Reference for the Austin – Toronto Music City Alliance Advisory Committee attached to this report as Appendix B.

 

5.         City Council forward a copy of this report and attachments to the Mayor Leffingwell and Austin City Council noting that Toronto City Council looks forward to working with the City of Austin to establish a formal dialogue and create meaningful trade partnerships to the mutual benefit of both cities as contemplated by the Music City Alliance Agreement.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

1.         Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture Division to conduct an outreach to Toronto music industry stakeholder groups and leaders to solicit interest and applications to be a member of the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council in a timely manner to facilitate a report directly to City Council at its meeting on December 16 – 17, 2013 recommending stakeholder appointments to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council.

 

2.         Requested the Chair and Vice-Chair of the Economic Development Committee to serve as the nominating panel to review the stakeholder applications for membership and select the candidates to be recommended for appointment to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council.

 

Councillor Josh Colle expressed thanks and appreciation to the following:

 

Arts & Crafts
Beaches Jazz Festival
Billions Corporation
Canadian Music Week
Coalition Music
Collective Concerts
Cultura Festival
Eggplant Entertainment
Feldman Agency
Front Row Centre
Harbourfront Centre
Jewish Music Week in Toronto
Lacquer Channel Mastering
Luminato
Massey Hall, Roy Thompson Hall
Music Canada
North By Northeast
One Fire Movement
Starfish Entertainment
Toronto Jazz Festival
Toronto Tourism

Councillor Layton
Councillor Carroll
Councillor Crawford
Councillor Thompson

Origin

(November 18, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

Toronto is an international music city and the largest centre of music in Canada.  It has a thriving music industry and a well-established and vibrant music scene that engages people across the city, attracts visitors and artists, and engages with other industries such as film, television, and fashion.  The music sector is a significant industry and a major cultural asset within the city of Toronto.  While Toronto is an international music centre with an abundance of talent and most of the physical infrastructure required for success, it can be bigger and better. 

 

Earlier this term, City Council adopted a new economic strategy, Collaborating for Competitiveness: A Strategic Plan to Accelerate Economic Growth and Job Creation in Toronto, and a new culture strategy Creative Capital Gains:  An Action Plan for Toronto.  Both strategic plans support initiatives to advance the music industry.

 

As is the case with a number of other sectors, one of the most significant barriers to success is the fragmented voice and activities of the music industry.  Toronto is home to many talented individuals and firms in the various sub-sectors within the music industry, however, it lacks the connective tissue necessary to make the separate parts into a whole and realize its full potential. 

 

In addition to the above referenced strategic plans for economic growth and culture, City Council and the Economic Development Committee have also adopted specific recommendations in support of the establishment of a Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council and endorsing a Music City Alliance with Austin, Texas.

 

In October of this year, Mayor Ford together with Councillors Thompson, Crawford, Colle and Ford also participated in a mission to Austin, Texas, to exchange knowledge and best practices in regard to strengthening the music industry as a means to stimulate economic growth and job creation.  The City of Austin is recognized as the Live Music Capital of the World.  It has a population about one- third that of Toronto but has developed a music industry that generates about three times as much economic activity.

 

Austin has achieved this impressive outcome through deliberate and collaborative approach to integrate and coordinate the activities, efforts and resources of the City, private sector, and community on a year round basis.  This collaborative approach supports and facilitates signature events such as the South by South West (SXSW) festival, the largest music festival in the world based on number of official performers and venues, and the Austin City Limits (ACL) festival, as well as numerous smaller events and activities.

 

Following endorsement by Austin City Council and Toronto City Council a Music City Alliance Agreement was signed by Mayor Leffingwell on behalf of the City of Austin and Mayor Ford on behalf of the City of Toronto on October 3rd, 2013.  The Austin – Toronto Music City Alliance is the first partnership of its kind anywhere in the world.

 

The first and most important next step for the City of Toronto is to establish a Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council to accelerate the formation of the connective tissue required to strengthen and expand the music industry.  The Advisory Council would provide a forum for the discussion of opportunities and challenges, exchange of ideas, input and advice, and collaborative development of recommendations to advance the music sector in Toronto.

 

An Austin - Toronto Music City Alliance Advisory Committee should also be established and a framework set out to give effect to the Agreement between the City of Austin and the City of Toronto, i.e. to strengthen ties, and support and encourage opportunities for mutually beneficial practical exchanges in the field of music and culture.  To ensure alignment, a Working Group of the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council will be formed to represent Toronto on the Austin – Toronto Music City Alliance Advisory Committee.

 

This report recommends the establishment of a Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council and an Austin – Toronto Music City Alliance Advisory Committee.  Terms of Reference for both Advisory Groups are attached as Appendix A and Appendix B respectively.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 18, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Toronto Music Sector (Collaborating for Competitiveness - Implementation Action 6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63648.pdf
(November 1, 2013) Appendix A: Terms of Reference, Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63953.pdf
(November 1, 2013) Appendix B: Draft Terms of Reference, Austin, Toronto Music City Alliance Partnership
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63954.pdf
(October 3, 2013) Appendix C: Austin - Toronto Music City Alliance Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63956.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 16, 2013) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council: Terms of Reference and Appointment of New Members (ED27.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65190.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Proposed Membership for the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council
Attachment 2 - Revised Terms of Reference for the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65192.pdf

Speakers

Graham Henderson, President, Music Canada
Jesse Kumagai, The Corporation of Massey Hall and Roy Thomson Hall
Bill King, Beaches International Jazz Festival
Maia Davies, Artist, Ladies of the Canyon
Jeff Cohen, Collective Concerts
Noah Mintz, Lacquer Channel Recording
Andrew Weir, Tourism Toronto
Rob Lanni, Coalition Music
Ray Williams, President, Music Marketing Inc. and Grammy Award winner (Submission Filed)
Andreas Kalogiannides, Kalogiannides Law
Che Kothari, Chair, Manifesto
Councillor Josh Colle

Communications (Committee)

(November 22, 2013) Submission from Ray Williams (ED.New.ED27.2.1)
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson to Mayor Leffingwell and Councillor Martinez, City of Austin, Texas (ED.New.ED27.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/comm/communicationfile-41803.pdf

ED27.3 - Making Space for Culture Phase One (Creative Capital Gains - Implementation Action 10)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the report titled: "Securing Cultural Benefits: Approaches to the Use of Section 37 for Arts and Culture facilities" produced by R.E. Millward and Associates in association with Lord Cultural Resources be forwarded to the Chief Planner, for consideration as part of the City's overall Section 37 review.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to submit a final report in 2014 following the completion of Phase Two of the Making Space for Culture project.

Origin

(October 21, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an update to Council on Phase One of the Making Space for Culture project. The project was undertaken to address one of the key recommendations of the Creative Capital Gains report: "that the City ensure a supply of affordable, sustainable, cultural space."

 

Twenty of forty-four wards were consulted through public meetings and an online survey. Existing community cultural infrastructure was mapped and verified to provide baseline data to prioritize and guide decision-making around future investment in cultural infrastructure. Phase One of the project was completed in the spring of 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 21, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Making Space for Culture Phase One (Creative Capital Gains - Implementation Action 10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-62973.pdf
(March 1, 2013) Attachment 1: Making Space for Culture - Community Consultation Summaries, Phase One
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-62974.pdf
(March 1, 2013) Attachment 2: Securing Cultural Benefits: Approaches to the Use of Section 37 for Arts and Culture Facilities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-62975.pdf
(November 22, 2013) Making Space for Culture, Progress Presentation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-62989.pdf

Speakers

John M. Burke, Planning Associate, R.E. Millward & Associates Ltd.
Catharine Tanner, Vice President, Lord Cultural Resources

ED27.4 - Culture Build Investment Program - 2013 Allocations (Creative Capital Gains - Implementation Action 11)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the Culture Build Investment Program allocations for the following organizations:

 

a.

Armenian Community Centre

$10,000.00

b.

Arraymusic

$45,000.00

c.

Centre for Indigenous Theatre

$10,000.00

d.

Coleman Lemieux and Compagnie

$25,000.00

e.

Dance Collection Danse

$10,000.00

f.

Gallery 44

$20,000.00

g.

Riverdale Immigrant Women Enterprises

$35,000.00

h.

Tarragon Theatre

$35,000.00

i.

Toronto Dance Foundation

$10,000.00

 

 

 

Total

$200,000.00

 

Origin

(October 21, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the 2013 Culture Build Investment Program allocations to nine non-city-owned not-for-profit cultural facilities. The total allocation of $200,000.00 for 2013 Culture Build Investment Program was approved by City Council as part of the Economic Development and Culture budget on April 3 and 4, 2013.

 

The Culture Build Investment Program provides matching funds to assist the City's not-for-profit cultural sector with financing for state of good repair capital projects.  The arts and cultural organizations that are supported through the Culture Build Investment Program provide a wide variety of opportunities for Toronto residents to engage in the arts as participants, volunteers or audience members.  In its first seven years, the Culture Build Investment Program has helped bring 62 cultural facilities closer to a state of good repair.

 

The recommendations for allocations contained in this report are the result of a Peer Panel review of the applications received at the July 15, 2013 deadline according to established criteria. The administration of the review was carried out in accordance with the City of Toronto Grants Policy as adopted by Council on December 16 and 17, 1998.

 

Recent feedback from this year's Peer Review Panel suggest the Culture Build's eligibility criteria should be expanded to include a wider range of facilities with a  core cultural mandate,  and  to include funding for feasibility studies for projects that would meet the criteria.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 21, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager Economic Development and Culture on the Culture Build Investment Program - 2013 Allocations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63067.pdf

ED27.5 - Renewal of Multi-Year Agreement with the Toronto Arts Council (2014-2018)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to the Deputy City Manager Cluster A to enter into a five-year agreement effective January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2018, with the Toronto Arts Council for the administration and distribution of arts and culture funding on behalf of the City of Toronto.

 

2.         City Council direct that the agreement with the Toronto Arts Council be subject to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

3.         City Council direct that the Toronto Arts Council continue to submit its annual funding request through the City's annual operating budget process.

Origin

(November 14, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The City entered into a formal agreement with the Toronto Cultural Advisory Corporation operating as the Toronto Arts Council (TAC) in 2002.  The agreement was renewed for another five year term commencing January 1, 2007 and extended twice for one-year terms until December 31, 2013. This report seeks the authority to enter into a new five-year agreement with substantially the same terms and conditions as in previous agreements. A new clause which delineates acknowledgement of the City's funding has been added to the agreement.

 

The proposed five-year funding agreement, being effective from January 2, 2014 to December 31, 2018, will allow for a continuing and structured link between the City and the Toronto Arts Council.  It will enable planning and service delivery that offers an increased degree of stability, accountability to City Council, and sets out the City's terms and conditions.  Specific requirements and deliverables from the TAC are set out in the formal agreement based on the nature of the arts and cultural services provided to the City, its residents and visitors to Toronto.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 14, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Renewal of Multi-Year Agreement with the Toronto Arts Council (2014-2018)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63667.pdf

Speakers

Claire Hopkinson, Director and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Arts Council

ED27.6 - Policies for City of Toronto Museum Collections

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the Historical Collection Development Policy (Attachment No. 1), the Historical Collection Management Policy (Attachment No. 2), the Living History Collection Policy (Attachment No. 3), the Personal Collections Policy (Attachment No. 4) and the related Definitions (Attachment No. 5) in the report (October 21, 2013) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.

Origin

(October 21, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve a revised set of policies to be administered by Museum Services relating to the City of Toronto's collections of artifacts, archaeological and natural history specimens and objects used for hands-on educational and programming purposes at City museums.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 21, 2013) Report and Attachments 1 - 5 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Policies for City of Toronto Museum Collections
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-62990.pdf

ED27.7 - Working Group Results for the Mr. Christie's Site at 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse the Vision Statement and ten Guiding Principles described in the report (October 29, 2013) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to support and guide future land uses for the lands known municipally as 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road to encourage transformative employment opportunities for the site and area capitalizing on its unique size, location, visibility, and access to the downtown.

Origin

(October 29, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

On November 1, 2012, Mondelēz Canada (Mondelēz) announced that it intended to close its "Lakeshore" bakery, known as the “Mr. Christie’s” site, located at 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road, in the third quarter of 2013. 

 

At its meeting of November 27-29, 2012, in considering the employment function and potential of the Mr. Christie’s site, City Council directed City staff to strike a working group with Labour, post-secondary institutions and other stakeholders to explore options on the Mr. Christie's site, to maintain existing employment by possibly hosting educational and/or commercial food incubator programs and possible new food industry tenants for the site, amongst other uses. 

 

Between June and September 2013, three working group meetings were convened by City staff and co-chaired by the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.  Through a consensus-based approach facilitated by City staff, the working group generated a Vision Statement and ten Guiding Principles intended to help inform the redevelopment potential of the site with a focus on employment opportunities and maintaining the lands for employment purposes. This report outlines the results of the working group process and suggested next steps.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 29, 2013) Report and Attachments 1 - 4 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Working Group Results for the Mr. Christie's Site at 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West and 23 Park Lawn Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63607.pdf

Speakers

Stephanie Cass, Director, Mondelez Canada
John Matheson, Strategy Corporation
Councillor Mark Grimes

ED27.8 - Service Canada Funding for the Youth Employment Toronto and Toronto Youth Job Corp

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to sign a contract renewal agreement with Service Canada for the Youth Employment Toronto program for up to $445,466.00 in federal subsidy with a $161,110.00 contribution from the City's tax base.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to sign a contract renewal agreement with Service Canada for the Toronto Youth Job Corp program for up to $2,228,375.00 in federal subsidy with a $219,100.00 contribution from the City's tax base, and $212,580.00 contribution from the Social Assistance Stabilization Reserve Fund (XQ1054).

 

3.         City Council direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(November 7, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report seeks authority to renew the agreement with Service Canada for the City-administered Youth Employment Toronto (YET) program for the 2014 contract year. YET is an on-going program, cost-shared with the federal government.

 

The report also updates Council on the implications of the Toronto Youth Job Corp (TYJC) program model submitted to Service Canada in the recent federal call for proposals (CFP) process. TYJC provides pre-employment support, structured employment training, employer placement and follow up supports for those youth most distant from the labour market.   Through the federal CFP process, the City has applied to continue to administer TYJC as a cost-shared program between Government of Canada and the City of Toronto for the 2014 contract year. In late October 2013, Service Canada advised that the City of Toronto was selected as the successful proponent for the 2014-2015 Toronto Youth Job Corp contract.

 

Contract renewals have occurred on an annual basis with the Government of Canada over the 30-year history of both YET and TYJC. The current Service Canada contract for the YET program ends on December 20, 2013, and on January 3, 2014 for TYJC.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 7, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on the Service Canada Funding for the Youth Employment Toronto and Toronto Youth Job Corp
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63647.pdf

ED27.11 - Results of Amended Polling Process for New and Expanding Business Improvement Areas; and Amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 19, including Use of Resources during an Election

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1749 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the amendments to the Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas in relation to the use of resources during an election, definitions, annual general and general meetings, boards of management, establishing/expanding a BIA, meeting on holidays, annual budget and financial procedures.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council to amend Municipal Code Chapter 19 substantially as set out in with Attachment 1 to this report and subject to any necessary minor substantive or stylistic refinements as may be identified by the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture and the City Solicitor.

Origin

(October 17, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to inform City Council of the results of the amended polling process for new and expanding Business Improvement Areas (BIAs), as requested by Council in 2011.  In accordance with the direction of City Council, adopted at its meeting on February 20th and 21st, 2013, the report also proposes an amendment to Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, respecting the City's policies regarding the use of resources during an election.  Several additional amendments to the Chapter, many technical in nature, are also recommended.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 17, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Results of Amended Polling Process for New and Expanding Business Improvement Areas; and Amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 19, including Use of Resources during an Election
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63644.pdf
(October 17, 2013) Attachment No. 1 - Amended Municipal Code Chapter 19 Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63608.pdf

ED27.12 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2014 Operating Budgets - Report No. 1

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 8 - York West, 9 - York Centre, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 29 - Toronto-Danforth, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 31 - Beaches-East York, 32 - Beaches-East York

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt and certify the 2014 recommended expenditures and levy requirements of the following Business Improvement Areas:

 

Business Improvement Area

2014 Expenditure
Estimates
($)

2014 Levy
Funds Required
($)

Bloor West Village

407,179

374,019

Chinatown

669,211

363,373

Danforth Village

643,073

532,961

Dufferin-Finch

806,390

800,390

Fairbank Village

213,297

210,240

Gerrard India Bazaar

294,459

211,459

Korea Town

99,216

92,923

Mimico Village

40,412

34,377

Parkdale Village

367,037

250,907

Riverside District

233,905

168,905

The Danforth

371,362

300,207

West Queen West

257,749

248,916

Wilson-Keele

280,580

275,580

 

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report brings forward Business Improvement Area (BIA) annual operating budgets for approval by City Council as required by the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  City Council approval is required to permit the City to collect funds through the tax levy on behalf of the BIAs.

 

Complete budgets and supporting documentation received by October 22, 2013 have been reviewed and are reported here; BIA Operating Budgets received after this date will be brought forward in later reports.  Of the 77 established BIAs, 13 BIA budgets are submitted for approval in this report.

 

The recommendations in this report reflect 2014 Operating Budgets approved by the respective BIAs’ Boards of Management and have been reviewed by City staff to ensure BIA budgets reflect Council’s approved policies and practices.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 31, 2013) Report and Attachment A and B from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on the Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2014 Operating Budgets - Report No. 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63431.pdf

ED27.13 - Business Improvement Area (BIA) Board of Management - Addition and Deletion

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve one addition and one deletion to the Fairbank Village BIA Board of Management as set out in Attachment No. 1 to the report dated October 28, 2013, from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.

 

2.         City Council direct that Schedule A of the Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas (BIA), be amended, as necessary, to reflect the number of members and the number of members required for quorum for each Business Improvement Area (BIA) Board of Management as necessary.

 

3.         City Council confirm that under Council's Public Appointments Policy, Board members are appointed at the pleasure of Council, and Council retains the right to replace any appointed member at any time and for any reason.

Origin

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that City Council approve one addition and one deletion to the Fairbank Village Business Improvement Area (BIA) Board of Management.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 28, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Business Improvement Area (BIA) Board of Management - Addition and Deletion
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63633.pdf

ED27.14 - Extension of the Yonge Street Cultural Corridor from Dundas Street north to Davenport Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication ED27.14.1 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the Yonge Street Cultural Corridor be extended from Dundas Street north to Davenport Road.

 

2.         City Council direct that the extension of the Yonge Street Cultural Corridor be included in the North Downtown Yonge Planning Framework.

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Report from the General Manager Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the extension of the Yonge Street Cultural Corridor from Dundas Street north to Davenport Road.

 

This report is part of finalizing the North Downtown Yonge Planning Framework (NDYPF) and is meant to reinforce an official plan amendment with area specific policies and urban design guidelines as the implementation tools.

 

Approved by City Council in 2001, the Waterfront Culture and Heritage Infrastructure Plan shows the Yonge Street Cultural Corridor terminating at Dundas Street.  The goal of the Plan was to create a distinctive framework through which to visualize the cultural landscape of Toronto's central waterfront; to connect it to the larger waterfront and integrate it with important cultural and heritage resources in the city core.

 

Since 2001, a significant amount of cultural infrastructure along Yonge from Dundas Street north to Davenport Road has been established, reinforcing the concept of extending Yonge Street as a cultural corridor.   This portion of Yonge Street north of Dundas Street has undergone multimillion dollars in construction and renovations to cultural facilities with several of the renovations involving adaptive reuse of heritage buildings.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 30, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Extension of the Yonge Street Cultural Corridor from Dundas Street North to Davenport Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63561.pdf
(November 1, 2013) Attachment - Map of Yonge Street Cultural Corridor
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-63606.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 17, 2013) E-mail from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers & Solicitors (CC.New.ED27.14.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44056.pdf

ED27.16 - Sale of Decommissioned Street Name Signs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Transportation Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (ED27.16a [PW27.5a] with recommendations)

Items ED27.16 and PW27.5 will be considered together

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

1.         Requested the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to meet with the General Manager, Transportation Services, and report to City Council on options for artists to create public art installations with the retired street signs.

Origin

(November 22, 2013) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher

Summary

On Wednesday, November 20, 2013, the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee discussed item PW27.5 the Sale of Decommissioned Street Signs and approved a framework for the sale of the signs.

 

The Committee also requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, meet with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and report to City Council on options for artists to create public art installations with the retired street signs.

 

Transportation Services has already received over 3000 requests from the public to purchase signs which indicates how strongly residents feel about these "pieces of Toronto".  The street signs also provide an exciting opportunity for artists who are interested in making work using such a compelling material in the creation of pieces of art that are reflective of the rich and dynamic history of our City.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 22, 2013) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher on the Sale of Decommissioned Street Signs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-64035.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 6, 2013) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Use of Decommissioned Street Signs for Artists (ED27.16a/PW27.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64861.pdf

Government Management Committee - Meeting 26

GM26.1 - Apportionment of Property Taxes - November 18, 2013 Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the individual Apportionment applications made pursuant to Section 322 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as provided in the Apportionment Reports marked as Appendices A and B attached to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Treasurer, excluding the following application from Appendix B: 

 

Ward Number

Tax Year

Property Location

36

2013

63 Claremore Ave.

 

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

The process of redistributing outstanding property taxes from one parcel of land to many newly created properties following a severance or re-development of land is referred to as “the apportionment of taxes”.

 

This report deals with 26 tax apportionment applications made by the Treasurer or to the Treasurer by an owner of land pursuant to section 322 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the properties listed in Appendices A and B (attached).  

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting at which the applicants and / or property owners may express any concerns.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee. 

 

Staff  have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Treasurer on Apportionment of Property Taxes - November 18, 2013 Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63225.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Appendix A - Apportionment Report - Taxpayer Initiated Tax Apportionments (October 15, 2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63228.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Appendix B - Apportionment Report - Treasurer Initiated Tax Apportionments (October 15, 2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63229.pdf

Speakers

Makeda Alemu

GM26.2 - Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - November 18, 2013 Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to Section 323 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as provided in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix A attached to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Treasurer, excluding the following applications:

 

Appeal

Number

Ward

Number

 

Property Address

201300990

2

749 Scarlett Rd

201300991

2

751 Scarlett Rd

 

2.         City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to section 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping amounts) identified in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix B to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Treasurer.

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report deals with tax appeal applications made to the Treasurer pursuant to sections 323 and 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA).  Section 323 permits Council to cancel, reduce or refund taxes in cases when, during the year, a property undergoes changes such as when it is destroyed by fire or demolished, becomes exempt from taxation, or is reclassified due to a change in use.  Under section 325 of the COTA, taxpayers can request a cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes when an error in the assessment roll is identified which results in an overcharge.

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting where applicants may make a submission in defence of their position.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.

 

Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Treasurer on Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - November 18, 2013 Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63232.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Appendix A - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 323 of COTA, Hearing 2013H5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63233.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Appendix B - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 325 of COTA, Hearing 2013H5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63234.pdf

GM26.4 - Facilities Management Division - Approval of Major Capital Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the implementation of the following process improvements for completing cost estimates for major capital projects within the Chief Corporate Officer's jurisdiction prior to Council's consideration of a project:

 

a.         The Major Capital Project approval process shall include Feasibility, Design and Construction Budget approval with the associated funding requirements. Council approval of the project shall be in four phases:

 

Phase One - Feasibility and Conceptual Design

Phase Two - Site Investigations, Schematic Design & Design Development

Phase Three - Detail Design and Contract Documents

Phase Four - Tender and Construction Award

 

The overall budget shall include all phases of the project and allocate the required budget for each of the individual phases. Council approval of the budgets for each individual phase is required.

 

b.         Requirements for funding availability, timing from other orders of Government or Private Sector Partners shall be known and confirmed prior to advancing into joint venture projects and such requirements shall be considered in the scheduling of the design and contract document production and construction phases.

 

c.          When possible complete investigative testing, environmental assessment, historical research and destructive investigation to determine the site conditions, building features and conditions should be done early in the design stage. This investigation shall be completed during the schematic design stage to allow for the resulting information to be included in the design budget.

 

d.         Funding requirements shall align to requirements of the project and be based on cost estimates prepared by a Third Party Cost Consultant commissioned to report after each of the major phases namely: Conceptual Design, Schematic Design, Design Development and Contract Documents when completed.

 

e.         On all Major Capital Projects, a third party Peer Review Consultant shall be commissioned to ensure the project documents are completed and as accurate as possible prior to tender issue.

 

f.          Annual Reporting to Council on Major Capital Projects will include status on budget and schedule.

 

2.         City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to report back to the Government Management Committee on major facility capital project updates in 2014 before the summer recess and thereafter once a year before July 1st until projects are completed.

Origin

(November 5, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

At the meeting of October 15, 2013 the Government Management Committee requested in item Committee Decision Motion 2, that the Chief Corporate Officer (CCO) report on ways to provide complete cost estimates on Major Capital Projects within the Chief Corporate Officer's jurisdiction prior to Council consideration of a project.  As projects are advanced, forecast budget will be reported by design phase as well as in annual budget.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 5, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Facilities Management Division - Approval of Major Capital Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63527.pdf

GM26.5 - Union Station Revitalization Project - Status Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to implement the ongoing and future construction work either though a continuation or combination of the current contractual arrangement of the retained Construction Manager/General Contractor or other available construction delivery mechanisms currently approved under current City Council procurement policies and procedures.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to amend the following contracts, retainers and agreements (excluding all recoverable HST), in accordance with the details as specified below, subject to additional budget approval set out in Recommendation No. 1 of the reports (October 1, 2013 and October 31, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer:

 

a.         NORR Limited, Architects and Engineers (Purchase Order No. 6030175), in the additional amount of up to $2,000,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes), revising the current contract value to $41,000,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes) to provide the required additional design and construction services associated with third party items;

 

b.         Osler, Hoskin and Harcourt LLP in the additional amount of up to $150,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes), revising the current contract value to $950,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes) to continue to provide construction law services and expertise through the construction duration;

 

c.         Davies Ward Phillips and Vineberg LLP (Purchase Order No. 6025203),  in the additional amount of up to $500,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes), revising the current contract value to $2,870,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes) to provide real estate legal advice and expertise for the on-going agreement updates associated with the revitalization project, and

 

d.         PWC (Purchase Order No. 6037971) in the additional amount of $600,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes), revising the current contract value to $1,128,000.00 (net of all applicable taxes) to provide on-going real estate support and financial advisory assistance associated with the revitalization project.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee

 

1.         Deferred consideration of the following recommendation in the reports (October 1, 2013 and October 31, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer until its January 6, 2014 meeting:

 

“1.       City Council refer consideration of the proposed revised financial plan incorporating $60 million increase to recoverable debt and $20 million from the Union Station Reserve Fund (XR2501)  to address the need for additional funding of $80 million to the Budget Committee as part of the 2014 Capital Budget Process.”

 

2.         Deferred consideration of the following recommendation in the report (October 31, 2013) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer until its January 6, 2014 meeting:

 

“2.       City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to reduce the City's use of recoverable debt on the Union Station capital project if new sources of funding from Transport Canada and/or Metrolinx become available resulting from requests of these funding partners to share in the project cost increases."

 

3.         Requested the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer to provide a report to the January 6, 2014 Government Management Committee meeting with an update on the responses from the provincial and federal governments.

Origin

(October 1, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an update on the City of Toronto's Union Station Revitalization Project, including a status report on the construction progress and an update on the project's funding and revenue forecasts.  Budget costs are forecasted to be higher by $80 million or about 11 percent.  However, self-sustaining project revenues (i.e. recoverable debt) and contribution from the Union Station Reserve Fund will be sufficient to offset the additional costs with no new net impact on taxes.

 

Union Station is a National Historic site and one of the finest examples of Beaux – Art Architecture in Canada.  As part of the sale in 2000 from the Toronto Terminals Railway Company Limited to the City of Toronto, the City was required to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with Parks Canada which governs all the restoration work at the station.  Union Station opened in 1927 and has often been characterised as a grand urban gateway, and was intended to transform the town of York into a world class metropolis.  Today the City of Toronto is setting an example of restoration and revitalization of this historic site, once completed the station will act as a gateway to the waterfront and the City.

 

The Union Station Revitalization Project is now in its fourth year of a 6 year construction schedule.  It is one of the most complicated projects in the country, "wedged" into one of the most congested parts of the City and being undertaken while the TTC funded subway platform reconstruction is underway as well as two other major Metrolinx funded infrastructure projects:  the GO Transit Atrium & Track Signalling/Repair, and the construction of the Union Pearson Express terminal station. The total re-investment and re-vitalization by all levels of government and organizations is estimated at approximately $1.5 billion.

 

The Union Station Revitalization Project is on time for completion in 2016.  Union Station is the largest transportation hub in the country handling 65 million passengers per year which is expected to grow to 130 million passengers per year by 2021.  This is by far the busiest transportation hub in the country.  Without the revitalization of the Station and the capacity the City is adding through concourse construction, the City would not be able to handle these volumes and arguably would be limiting the City's overall potential to grow.  This project paired with Metrolinx transit projects are an investment in the City's infrastructure that will promote transit oriented growth in the long term.

 

As the project has progressed, it is becoming evident from discussions with the Head Lessee that the Station will also act as a destination for culture, entertainment and dining experiences.  Union Station will not just be a place that people pass through on their way to work or back, it will become a destination in itself.  Union Station will also link the communities north of the station to communities now being developed to the south and will in essence act as a City/community gathering place where "the best of Toronto" can be experienced. Current forecasts indicate an additional $80 million is required to complete the project.  This additional requirement can be funded from self-sustaining recoverable debt (primarily financed through rental income). It is recommended that work continue to deliver the essential scope of the project to implement the Council, Partners and Stakeholders envisioned iconic centrepiece of the downtown core and transit network.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 1, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer on Union Station Revitalization Project - Status Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63324.pdf
(October 1, 2013) Appendix A - Project Financial Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63326.pdf
(October 1, 2013) Appendix B - Forecast Summary of Project Cost Changes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63327.pdf
(October 1, 2013) Appendix C - Union Station Statement of Continuity
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63325.pdf
(October 1, 2013) Appendix C-1 - Union Station Cash Flow Forecast
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63328.pdf
(October 15, 2013) Presentation from the Chief Corporate Officer on the Union Station Revitalization Project Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63329.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(October 11, 2013) Letter from Grant Humes, Executive Director, Toronto Financial District BIA (GM.Main.GM26.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/comm/communicationfile-40826.pdf

5a - Union Station Revitalization Project - Supplementary Report - Alternative Financing Options

Origin
(October 31, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer
Summary

The purpose of this report is to outline additional incremental financing options to address the forecasted $80 million increase in Union Station capital project costs. To date proposed financing options have included increasing recoverable debt by $60 million based on a revised revenue forecast of commercial rents from the Head Lessee and drawing from the Union Station Reserve (XR2501) for the $20 million balance.  The Union Station reserve fund consists of net rental revenues from operating Union Station that have accumulated over the years, with no tax funding contributions.

 

Alternative funding options include (1) seeking funding support from Transport Canada and Metrolinx, our funding partners, and (2) accessing funding from the recent development charge allocations for the Union Station location.

Background Information (Committee)
(October 31, 2013) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer on Developing a Process for Consultation on Union Station Revitalization Project - Supplementary Report - Alternative Financing Options
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63526.pdf

GM26.7 - Licence Renewal and Amendment for Telecommunication Antenna Use by Toronto Police Services Board

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
The Chief Corporate Officer has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GM26.7a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City of Toronto (the "City) or (the "Licensee") to enter into a licence renewal and amending agreement (the "Agreement") for use of lands as described in Attachment 1 - Confidential Information, (the "Lands") substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix "A" and in Attachment 1 - Confidential Information and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer or her designate (the "CCO") and in a form acceptable to the City solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the Agreement including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers, notices of termination, provided that the CCO may, at any time refer considerations of such matter to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

3.         City Council direct that the Chief Corporate Officer and Director of Real Estate be severally authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take whatever action is necessary to give effect thereto.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee requested the Chief Corporate Officer to continue to negotiate with the Licensor on a license fee rate that would be comparable with rates that the City charges telecom providers on City sites and report directly to City Council.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request Council authority to enter into a licence renewal and amending agreement for an existing site.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 31, 2013) Report and Appendix A from the Chief Corporate Officer on Licence Renewal and Amendment for Telecommunication Antenna Use by Toronto Police Services Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63528.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 - Licence Renewal and Amendment for Telecommunication Antenna Use by Toronto Police Services Board

Background Information (City Council)

(December 13, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Licence Renewal and Amendment for Telecommunication Antenna Use by Toronto Police Services Board (GM26.7a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64947.pdf

GM26.8 - Telecommunication Towers and Antennae Agreements between Rogers Communication Inc. and the City of Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Chief Corporate Officer has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GM26.8a for information)

Communications GM26.8.6 to GM26.8.11 have been submitted on this Item

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City to enter into a master licence agreement with Rogers for the installation, operation and maintenance of telecommunication equipment (the "Agreement") for the sites set out in Appendix "A" to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and for further sites as may be authorized in the future, substantially on the terms set out in Appendix "B" and Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and such other terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer (the "CCO"), in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize that the confidential information contained in Attachment 1 - Confidential Information to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, will be made public once Council approves this report.

 

3.         City Council approve the licence fees contained in Attachment 1 – Confidential Information and the major terms and conditions contained in Appendix "B" along with such other and terms and conditions as may be added or amended by the CCO, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor  with respect to licence agreements between the City and other wireless communications carriers (the "Other Agreements") for the installation, operation and maintenance of telecommunication equipment on sites which may be authorized in the future pursuant to the delegated approval process.

 

4.         City Council authorize the CCO to administer and manage the Agreement, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers, notices and notices of termination, provided that the CCO may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

5.         City Council authorize the CCO and the Director of Real Estate Services be authorized severally to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City.

 

6.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto. 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee requested the Chief Corporate Officer to meet with Rogers Communications Inc. to establish better design protocols for the installation of Cellular Transmission Equipment on City of Toronto property which would eliminate the unsightly installations that are currently installed on public property and report directly to City Council.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report seeks Council approval for the City of Toronto to:

 

(a)        Enter into a new licence agreement with Rogers Communication Inc. ("Rogers") which would replace existing, expired licence agreements with Rogers Wireless (a predecessor corporation to Rogers) for telecommunication equipment on various City properties as listed in Appendix "A".

 

(b)        Approve the major terms and conditions as set out in Appendix B of new licence agreements with other wireless communications carriers on sites to be authorized in the future.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Telecommunication Towers and Antennae Agreements between Rogers Communication Inc. and the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63539.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix A - Locations of Rogers Installations on Various City Properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63542.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix B - Major Terms and Conditions of the Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63543.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 on Telecommunication Towers and Antennae Agreements between Rogers Communication Inc. and the City of Toronto

Background Information (City Council)

(December 13, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Design Protocol For Telecommunication Towers and Antennae (GM26.8a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64932.pdf
Attachment 1 - City of Toronto Telecommunications Tower and Antenna Protocol - Design Guideline Excerpt
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64948.pdf
Attachment 2 - Transportation Services - Telecommunication Antenna Placement and Design Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64950.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - made public on December 24, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65546.pdf
Confidential information - Licence Fee Schedule and Associated Zone Maps - made public on December 24, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65547.pdf

Speakers

Barbara Payne
Dan Welland
Deborah McCutcheon
Arlene Dewdney

Communications (Committee)

(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Jane Johnston (GM.New.GM26.8.1)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Smokey Dymny (GM.New.GM26.8.2)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Lori Penner (GM.New.GM26.8.3)
(November 20, 2013) Submission from Dr. Olle Johansson, Ph.D. Associate Professor, The Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet (GM.New.GM26.8.4)
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Margaret Friesen (GM.New.GM26.8.5)

Communications (City Council)

(December 13, 2013) Letter from Frank Clegg, Chief Executive Officer, Canadians for Safe Technology (CC.Supp.GM26.8.6)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Melissa Chalmers (CC.New.GM26.8.7)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CORRA) (CC.New.GM26.8.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44079.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Frank Clegg, Chief Executive Officer, Canadians for Safe Technology (C4ST) (CC.New.GM26.8.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44080.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from E. L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.GM26.8.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44081.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, Ossington Community Association (CC.New.GM26.8.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44082.pdf

GM26.9 - Provision of Proprietary Maintenance, Support and Associated Goods and Services for Vote Counting Equipment from Election Systems and Software (ES&S)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Clerk to negotiate and enter into an agreement, with Election Systems and Software Inc. (ES&S) for the maintenance and support of vote counting equipment and the supply of their associated goods and services, in the amount of $1,366,000 net of HST and $1,390,041.60 net of HST recoveries, for a period of four years from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017 on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Clerk and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(October 25, 2013) Report from the City Clerk and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority, under Toronto Municipal Code 195-9B, to enter into a single source agreement with Elections Systems & Software, Inc. (ES&S) for the continued maintenance and support of existing vote counting equipment and associated goods and services for the successful delivery of an election, in the amount of $1,366,000 net of HST and $1,390,041.60 net of HST recoveries, for a period of four years from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2017.

 

Although the original agreement with ES&S provided support for a period of 15 years (the expected life cycle of the equipment),  ES&S has agreed to support the City's equipment through to 2018 while the City determines how and when to move forward with the replacement of the voting counting equipment.

 

A new single source agreement is critical for the delivery of the 2014 election and any subsequent by-elections. Without a new contract the Clerk will be unable to use the equipment or any of the ES&S services for the 2014 election.  

 

ES&S is the single source provider for the maintenance, materials and services, and software product for the vote counting equipment, and has sole access to the proprietary intellectual property.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 25, 2013) Report from the City Clerk and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Provision of Proprietary Maintenance, Support and Associated Goods and Services for Vote Counting Equipment from Election Systems and Software (ES&S)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63097.pdf

GM26.10 - Award of Request for Proposal No. RFP 0613-13-0044 to Angus Inc. for the Renovation, Finance and Operation of a Food and Beverage Concession within Sherbourne Common Pavilion

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to negotiate and enter into a Licence Agreement with Angus Inc., being the sole proponent meeting the requirements of RFP No. 0613-13-0044, for the renovation, finance and operation of a food and beverage concession within Sherbourne Common Pavilion for a ten (10) year term commencing January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2023, with an option to extend at the sole discretion of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation (the "General Manager") for an additional five (5) years commencing January 1st, 2024 and terminating on December 31, 2028.

 

2.         City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, following execution of the licence agreement to Angus Inc.

Origin

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide information on the results of the Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 0613-13-0044 for the renovation, finance and operation of a food and beverage concession within Sherbourne Common Pavilion and to request authority to negotiate and enter into a Licence Agreement with the recommended proponent, Angus Inc. (referred to in this report as "Hero Certified Burgers"), being the sole proponent, for a ten (10) year term commencing January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2023, with the option to extend for an additional five (5) years commencing January 1, 2024 and terminating on December 31, 2028.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Award of Request for Proposal No. RFP 0613-13-0044 to Angus Inc. for the Renovation, Finance and Operation of a Food and Beverage Concession within Sherbourne Common Pavilion
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63071.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 - Contract Award - RFP 0613-13-0044 for Renovation, Finance, and Operation of a Food and Beverage Concession within Sherbourne Common Pavilion

GM26.11 - Toronto French Language Advisory Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council establish the Toronto French Language Advisory Committee for the balance of the current term of Council and adopt the Terms of Reference attached as Appendix A to the report (November 1, 2013) from the City Manager.

Origin

(November 1, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the establishment of a Toronto French Language Advisory Committee, and the adoption of its Terms of Reference attached as Appendix A. 

Background Information (Committee)

(November 1, 2013) Report and Appendix A from the City Manager on Toronto French Language Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63367.pdf

Speakers

Gilles Marchildon, Président, Board of Directors, Association des communautés francophones de l'Ontario à Toronto (ACFO - Toronto)

Communications (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Letter from Councillor Peter Milczyn (GM.New.GM26.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/comm/communicationfile-41641.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam (GM.New.GM26.11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/comm/communicationfile-41642.pdf

GM26.12 - Proprietary Information Technology Maintenance Contract Renewals and Amendments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant approval, subject to Operating Budget approval in each year, to increase the value of the nine (9) existing IT system maintenance contracts listed in Attachment A to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, due to growth of maintenance and support requirements from evolving IT projects, for a total amount not to exceed $1,200,538.45, net of HST recoveries for a period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015.

 

2.         City Council grant approval, subject to Operating Budget approval in each year, to renew five (5) IT system maintenance contracts listed in Attachment B to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, with a planned growth requirement due to software versions being upgraded and software modules that were required to be installed to accommodate the growing automated services that the City provides, at a total cost not to exceed $250,109.79, net of HST recoveries for a period of three (3) years from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015.

 

3.         City Council grant approval, subject to Operating Budget approval in each year, to renew the thirty-three (33) IT system maintenance contracts listed in Attachment C of this report that are required due to regular maintenance renewals to maintain the existing software and/or hardware with no planned growth requirements, at a total cost not to exceed $1,628,629.70, net of HST recoveries for a period of three (3) years from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015.

 

4.         City Council grant authority for City Divisions and Information & Technology to negotiate amendments to the contracts listed in Attachment A to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, based on the increased contract amounts recommended under Recommendation 1 of the report (October 30, 2013) from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and to enter into agreements to renew or extend the contracts identified in Attachments B and C to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, for a period of up to three (3) years from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2015, all in accordance with the report (October 30, 2013) from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, City Policies and Procedures and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

This report is a consolidated list of existing proprietary IT maintenance contracts that require renewals and amendments for various software applications and hardware throughout the City of Toronto.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek Council authority to renew and amend the existing IT maintenance contracts listed in Attachment A, B, and C which can only be provided by the vendors identified therein due to proprietary reasons.

 

In addition, this report will align the commitment approval period with that of GM32.20 and GM16.5, which is from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2015, instead of seeking a different approval period, e.g., 2013 to 2017.  Proceeding with this option will avoid overlapping of approval periods and will allow staff to consolidate any further renewal of all information technology systems proprietary contracts into one staff report before the current approval period ends on December 31, 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Proprietary Information Technology Maintenance Contract Renewals and Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63355.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Attachment A - Previously Reported Contract Renewals with Growth Requirements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63356.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Attachment B - Previously Unreported Contract Renewals with Planned Growth Requirements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63357.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Attachment C - Previously Unreported Contract Renewals with No Planned Growth Requirements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63358.pdf

GM26.13 - Microsoft Licences Reseller Selection

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority for the Chief Information Officer to enter into a new Contract with Compugen Inc., the successful vendor of  the competitive process conducted by the Province of Ontario's MGS, for the supply of Microsoft software licences.  This contract will be based on the same legal terms and conditions of the MGS Select Plus Agreement, for a three year period ending September 30, 2016, in an amount not to exceed $19,044,288 net of HST recoveries.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

This report requests authority to enter into a new contract with the Large Account Reseller, Compugen Inc., selected by the Province of Ontario's Ministry of Government Services (MGS) which resulted from a competitive process, for the supply of Microsoft Licences under the Microsoft Select Plus Agreement, for various City of Toronto Programs as required until September 30, 2016, under MGS Microsoft Master Business Agreement # U8364444.

 

A cost-benefit analysis of various Microsoft Licensing options was undertaken in support of the recommended approach.  Leveraging the Provincial MGS agreement provides the City with the best possible pricing for Microsoft Licences.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Microsoft Licences Reseller Selection
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63359.pdf

GM26.14 - Vehicle Capital Reserve Contributions Shortfalls

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Director, Fleet Services, in conjunction with Director, Financial Planning, to develop a financing strategy to determine a minimum vehicle reserve balance, which fully funds and optimizes the replacement of vehicles for all affected divisions.  The strategy is to be incorporated into the 2015 Budget submission process.  Options may include;

 

a.         The utilization and rationalization of the current fleet complement;

b.         Extending vehicle life cycles;

c.         Increasing reserve contributions; and

d.         A combination of the above.

 

2.         City Council request the Director, Fleet Services, to establish a monthly replacement reserve contribution for all off-road vehicles and equipment and that the Director, Fleet Services in consultation with Director, Financial Planning determine the feasibility of including such contributions as part of the 2015 Operating Budget Process.

 

3.         City Council request the Director, Fleet Services, to continue to lead and educate Divisions on proper use and maintenance of vehicles in order to maximize useful life, minimize operating costs and maintain safety standards.

 

4.         City Council  request City Divisions, Boards and Agencies, for 2014 and beyond, to fund their respective vehicle replacement reserves that such reserves do not fall into a negative balance and the reserves are adequate to meet future vehicle replacement needs and that this direction be forwarded to the Budget Committee as part of the 2014 Capital Budget process.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This staff report is in response to the Government Management Committee's meeting of September 9, 2013 item # GM24.15 – 2014 Service Level Review – Government Management Committee Programs,  recommendation #3 with respect to divisions that have not been committing sufficient capital reserve contributions for vehicle replacements and the associated replacement/sustainability concerns and increased costs.  Fleet Services in collaboration with Divisions and Financial Planning will develop a strategy to establish minimum reserve balances to be maintained by all City Programs and Agencies.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Vehicle Capital Reserve Contributions Shortfalls
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63521.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix 1 - 10 Year Vehicle Replacement Reserve Forecast
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63522.pdf

GM26.15 - Improving the Accuracy of Vehicle Meter Data

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Director, Fleet Services, to implement a Monthly Odometer Submission process on a pilot basis with the division(s) for units not being captured by the Automated Odometer Download solution.

 

2.         City Council request the Director, Fleet Services, to report the results of the Automated Odometer Download solution to the Government Management Committee by the end of the second quarter of 2015.

Origin

(October 25, 2013) Report from the Director, Fleet Services

Summary

This staff report responds to the Auditor General's Report titled, 'Reliable Data is Needed for Effective Fleet Management' dated April 18, 2013.  The Auditor General's Report included a requirement for the Director of Fleet Services to report to Government Management Committee by December 31, 2013 on steps that can be implemented to significantly improve the accuracy of vehicle odometer readings including any revisions necessary to odometer reading criteria for identifying unusual meter readings.

 

Staff investigated several options to improve odometer accuracy over the last six months.  The best option should be cost effective, eliminate manual inputting, build on current information systems and strengthen controls at the fuel pump.  The only option meeting all these criteria was an automated odometer download solution included in the current Fleet Management Information System (FMIS) software.  Subsequently, Fleet initiated an automated odometer download pilot at the city's fuel site located at 1026 Finch Avenue West, in August 2013.  Feedback from the drivers has been positive so far and the odometer data is accurate because it is transmitted in real-time from the vehicle's onboard computer to the FMIS.  If the pilot project is successful, Fleet Services plans to implement the automated odometer download capabilities at seventeen (17) fuel sites.

 

Further to the Auditor General's recommendations, staff are also reviewing the odometer reading criteria used in the FMIS and will amend and adjust them as necessary.

 

Included in this staff report are three (3) recommendations to rollout the automated odometer solution to nine (9) fuel sites and 3,500 vehicles and pieces of equipment between 2013 – 2016 at an estimated cost of $1.7 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 25, 2013) Report from the Director, Fleet Services on Improving the Accuracy of Vehicle Meter Data
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63523.pdf

GM26.16 - Real Estate Expropriations - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project (South of Steeles): 1170 Sheppard Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, as Approving Authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of the property interest set out in Appendix A to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, of 1170 Sheppard Avenue West, in connection with the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension.

 

2.         City Council grant leave for introduction of the necessary Bill in Council to give effect thereto.

 

3.         City Council authorize City Staff to take all necessary steps to comply with the Expropriations Act, including but not limited to the preparation and registration of an Expropriation Plan and the services of Notices of Expropriation, Notices of Election as to a date for compensation and Notices of Possession.

 

4.         City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer, once there has been a final determination of the compensation payable to the owner by the arbitration, appeal or settlement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

On October 2, 3 and 4, 2012, City Council authorized City Staff to initiate expropriation proceedings, if necessary, to acquire a permanent easement in, over and through a portion of 1170 Sheppard Avenue West for vehicular and pedestrian access to and from an emergency exit building for maintenance purposes.

 

All necessary steps required under the Expropriations Act have been taken and this report recommends that City Council, as Approving Authority under the Expropriations Act, approve the expropriation of the property requirement identified in Appendix A to this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Real Estate Expropriations - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project (South of Steeles): 1170 Sheppard Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63530.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix A - Property Requirements Table (Stage 2 Approval)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63532.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix B - Reference Plans of Survey
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63533.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix C - Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63534.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 - Real Estate Expropriations - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project (South of Steeles): 1170 Sheppard Avenue West

GM26.17 - Sale of Part of 22 John Street, Grant of Permanent Easement for Part of 53 Strachan Avenue, and Real Estate Acquisition and Expropriation of 14 John Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
11 - York South-Weston, 19 - Trinity-Spadina

Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that:

 

            a.         Part of 22 John Street (near Weston Road and Lawrence Avenue), containing approximately 910 square metres (9,795 square feet), as shown on the sketch attached as Appendix 1 (the "Property"), be declared surplus to the City’s requirements, with the intended manner of disposal to be a sale to Metrolinx, and all steps necessary to comply with Chapter 213 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, be taken;

 

            b.         Authority be granted to enter into an Agreement of Purchase and Sale for the transfer to Metrolinx of the Property, at a purchase price of $340,000, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council direct that:

 

            a.         Part of 53 Strachan Avenue containing approximately 2,125 square metres (22,873 square feet) as shown on Appendix 2 (the "Easement Lands"), be declared surplus to the City’s requirements, with the intended manner of disposal to be a Permanent Easement to Metrolinx, and all steps necessary to comply with Chapter 213 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, be taken;

 

            b.         Authority be granted to enter into a Permanent Easement Agreement with Metrolinx for sub-surface tie-backs for its rail infrastructure within the Easement Lands, at a value up to $40,000, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council grant authority to commence negotiations to acquire the vacant lands located at 14 John Street, City of Toronto (the "Lands").

 

4.         City Council grant authority to initiate the expropriation process for the Lands (14 John Street).

 

5.         City Council grant authority to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Lands (14 John Street), to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearing that are received, to attend the hearing to present the City's position and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for its consideration.

 

6.         City Council direct that the proceeds from the sale of the Property (22 John Street) be held in the Community Development Reserve Fund (XR3100)  to support redevelopment of the surface parking lot at 22 John Street which includes a residential component, replacement municipal parking facility, a Farmer's Market and a Cultural Hub.

 

7.         City Council direct that the information contained in the Confidential Attachment to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the President, Toronto Parking Authority, be made public following completion of the transactions contemplated herein.

 

8.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions, deliver any notices, pay any expenses and amend the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), on such terms and conditions, as she may, from time to time, determine.

 

9.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the President, Toronto Parking Authority

Summary

This report seeks authority for a number of real estate transactions and proceedings to facilitate and expedite both the implementation of a Cultural Hub and the locating of access ramps for a pedestrian bridge over the Georgetown South rail corridor/Union-Pearson Air-Rail Link at the John Street location.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the President, Toronto Parking Authority, on Sale of Part of 22 John Street, Grant of Permanent Easement for Part of 53 Strachan Avenue, and Real Estate Acquisition and Expropriation of 14 John Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63544.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix 1 - 14 John Street Site View
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63545.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix 2 - 53 Strachan Avenue Site View
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63566.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix 3 - Rosemount Garden Parkette Site View
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63567.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix 4 - Rosemount Garden Parette Site Survey
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63568.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Appendix 5 - Confidential Attachment 1 - Sale of Part of 22 John Street, Grant of Permanent Easement for Part of 53 Strachan Avenue, and Real Estate Acquisition and Expropriation of 14 John Street

GM26.18 - Licence for Food Services in High Park and Western Beaches and Development of the Joy Oil Station

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to enter into Licence Extension and Amending Agreements (the "Extension Agreements") between the City of Toronto ( as "Licensor") and the Grenadier Group (as "Licensee") for the Licensed locations in High Park (Grenadier Restaurant and Concessions) and Western Beaches, shown at Appendix "A"  to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation , substantially on the terms and conditions as set out in Appendix "B" and in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and on such other terms and conditions as deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to enter into a Licence Agreement (the "Joy Oil and Restaurant Licence") between the Licensor and the Licensee for the Joy Oil building and adjacent lands for the proposed Restaurant at the Western Beaches, shown at Appendix "A" to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix "C" and in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and on such other terms and conditions as deemed appropriate by the Chief Corporate Officer or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, when the Extension Agreements and the Joy Oil Licence (collectively, the "Agreements") are executed.

 

4.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation in consultation with the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the Agreements including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the Extension Agreements and Joy Oil and Restaurant Licence, deliver any notices, pay expenses and amend the commencement and other dates on such earlier or later date(s), or such terms and conditions, as she may, from time to time determine.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

505707 Ontario Limited o/a Grenadier Group (the "Grenadier Group") has License Agreements with the City to exclusively operate food and restaurant facilities in High Park and Western Beaches.  The Grenadier Group submitted an unsolicited proposal to the City to extend the Licence Agreements for an additional 15 years, including $4.5 million in additional capital investment to redevelop the Joy Oil Station and undertake capital improvements at the High Park and Western Beaches concession facilities.  The current Licence Agreements expire in May 2016.

 

City Council directed staff to negotiate with Grenadier Group and carry out an analysis of the Grenadier Group proposal, as well as consider alternative uses for the Joy Oil Station and evaluate other opportunities to maximize the value at each licensed location.

 

Staff have reviewed the proposal with the assistance of a business consultant and negotiated with the Grenadier Group.   The purpose of this report is to submit the proposed terms and conditions of the Licence Extension with Grenadier Group for High Park and Western Beaches for approval, and evaluate other opportunities to maximize the value at each location.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 31, 2013) Report and Appendices A, B and C from the Chief Corporate Officer and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, on Licence for Food Services in High Park and Western Beaches and Development of the Joy Oil Station
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63570.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 - Licence for Food Services in High Park and Western Beaches and Development of the Joy Oil Station

Speakers

Councillor Sarah Doucette

GM26.19 - Toronto Police Service: Response to City Council’s Motion on Parking Enforcement Grace Periods

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to reconsider the matter relating to Parking Enforcement Grace Periods and provide a 10-minute grace period for pay and display parking prior to issuing a Parking Infraction Notice.

 

2.         City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to provide a grace period between 9:00 p.m. of one day to 12:01 p.m. of the next day when parking alternates from one side of the street to the other and when on-street permit parking is in effect.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee forwarded a copy of the report (October 22, 2013) from the Acting Chair, Toronto Police Services Board, to the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor, and other affected divisions, for a report to the February 24, 2014 Government Management Committee meeting on possible amendments to the City's parking by-laws to effect the changes requested by City Council with respect to grace periods, including any operational, public safety or financial impacts associated with any recommended changes to the City's parking by-laws.

Origin

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Toronto City Council, via the Government Management Committee, with the Toronto Police Service’s (Service) response to a City Council Motion with respect to parking enforcement grace periods.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Chair, Toronto Police Services Board, on Toronto Police Service: Response to City Council's Motion on Parking Enforcement Grace Periods
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-63096.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Josh Matlow

Licensing and Standards Committee - Meeting 25

LS25.1 - Correction to Municipal Code, Chapter 545, Licensing - Adult Entertainment Clubs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1790 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Licensing and Standards Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council reinstate the exemption for licensees who are also governed by the Liquor Licence Act from Sections 545-385 (A), (B), (C), and (G) – Hours of Operation and Section 545-386 – Drugs and Alcohol of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 545, Licensing.

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards

Summary

The purpose of this report is to correct an inadvertent error in the amendments to the Adult Entertainment Club (“AEC”) article of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 545, Licensing that were adopted by City Council on October 30, 2012 and April 3, 2013.

 

This report recommends reinstating a previously provided exemption for licensees governing the hours of club operation and the consumption of drugs and alcohol by certain AEC employees. The exemption specifically applied to AECs licensed under the Liquor Licence Act.

 

The Liquor Licence Act governs the hours of sale of alcohol, regulates the consumption of alcohol by patrons and prohibits the presence of illicit drugs in any establishment that holds a liquor licence.

 

Legal Services was consulted in the preparation of this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 20, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, on Correction to Municipal Code, Chapter 545, Licensing - Adult Entertainment Clubs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ls/bgrd/backgroundfile-64089.pdf

Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 24

PE24.2 - Parks Sports Field Maintenance and Fees

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse Parks, Forestry and Recreation's achievements to date on the service levels requested as per City Council approved Item EX21.8, and its continued efforts to improve sports field conditions.

 

2.         City Council endorse the 5% discount for non-profit, resident permit holders booking seasonal permits for 16 consecutive weeks or more, as identified in the Sports Field Playability and Responsibility Guidelines (Appendix B) in the report ((November 21, 2013) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, if the new sports field permit fees outlined above are approved.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Parks and Environment Committee referred the following recommendations to the Budget Committee for consideration with the 2014 Operating Budget process.

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to implement the sports field permit fees (including HST) for children and youth organizations for the 2014 season as follows:

 

$6/hour for A fields

$4/hour for B fields

$2/hour for C fields;

 

2.         City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, as necessary, to include the new sports field permit fees for children and youth organizations.

 

Origin

(November 21, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report provides information in response to a City Council request to report on improvements to sports fields in 2013. The report outlines the steps that Parks, Forestry and Recreation has taken to improve the relationship with sports organizations, enhance their ability to provide timely feedback on sports fields and fees, and deliver broader sports field and turf improvements.  These improvements have been the result of increased staff training, allocation of staff and resources to sports fields, an increase in field repairs and an enhancement of fields through the Integrated Plant Health Care (IPHC) Program.

 

The report recommends the implementation of the Council approved sports field permit fee increase for children and youth for class A, B and C fields for the 2014 sports permit season.  The report also outlines future plans for improving sports fields through ongoing consultation with the Sports Organization Reference Group, implementation of the Sports Field Playability and Responsibility Guidelines (See Appendix B) and reclassification of sports fields in 2014 to align with maintenance standards.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 21, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on the Parks Sports Field Maintenance and Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64041.pdf
Appendix A: Letter to Sports Organizations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64042.pdf
Appendix B: Sports Field Playability and Responsibility Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64043.pdf
Appendix C: IPHC Maintenance Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64044.pdf
Appendix D: Comparison of Turf Cultural Practices from 2012 to 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64045.pdf
Appendix E - Sports Fields Classification/Rating Standards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64019.pdf

Speakers

Patrick McConnell, Etobicoke Baseball Association
Councillor Janet Davis

Communications (Committee)

(December 3, 2013) E-mail from Howard Birnie, President, Leaside Baseball Association (PE.New.PE24.2.1)

PE24.3 - Resilient City: Preparing for Extreme Weather Events

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Chief Corporate Officer, to continue to coordinate the work of City Divisions, Agencies and Corporations, lead by the Office of Environment and Energy, to refine the effort of the Resilient City Working Group and report to the Parks and Environment Committee by April of 2014, on a strategy that sees the City define the key interdependencies between the City's infrastructure and services that can be used to set priorities and actions to be taken to enhance the resilience of the interdependent infrastructure and services to extreme weather.

 

2.         City Council invite Hydro One Inc. to the membership of the Resilient City Working Group.

Origin

(November 22, 2013) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with an update on the actions being taken to assess:

 

1.         the adequacy of the City's infrastructure and services to accommodate future extreme weather events as predicted in "Toronto's Future Weather and Climate Drivers Study";

 

2.         planned activities to enhance the City's assets and services to withstand future weather conditions; and

 

3.         what more may need to be done to ensure the safety and security of assets and services under future extreme weather conditions.

 

This report also provides a status update about implementation of the City's 2008 Climate Change Adaptation Strategy and the development of the City's Climate Change Adaptation Toolkit.

 

In 2011, the City of Toronto completed a study to help predict future climate conditions.  Key predictions from the "Toronto's Future Weather and Climate Drivers Study" were that Toronto might experience increasing average annual and maximum temperatures, more heat waves, and less frequent but much more intense rain events. The storm of July 8, 2013, during which severe thunderstorms and heavy rains flooded many parts of the City caused damage to public and private property and infrastructure, stranded thousands of commuters, and left tens of thousands of residents and businesses without electricity, emphasized the reality of the study's prediction.

 

The Chief Corporate Officer has coordinated the development of this report with the engagement of 14 City Divisions, Agencies and Corporations and Metrolinx and with support from Legal Services, Corporate Finance and Accounting Services. Work completed to date, has identified that while City operations have in place numerous initiatives, policies and services that support extreme weather adaptation, there is a need for additional work to evaluate a number of corporate wide issues and, in particular issues associated with the interdependencies of critical City infrastructure and services.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 22, 2013) Report and Appendix A from the Chief Corporate Officer on the Resilient City: Peparing for Extreme Weather Events
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64016.pdf

Speakers

Franz Hartman, Executive Director, Toronto Environmental Alliance

3a - Exploring Health and Social Impacts of Climate Change in Toronto

Origin
(November 8, 2013) Letter from the Board of Health
Summary

The Toronto Board of Health on November 4, 2013, considered a report (October 21, 2013) from the Medical Officer on Exploring Health and Social Impacts of Climate Change in Toronto

Background Information (Committee)
(November 8, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Board of Health on Exploring Health and Social Impacts of Climate Change in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64017.pdf
(October 21, 2013) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on Exploring Health and Social Impacts of Climate Change
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64018.pdf

PE24.6 - Assisting Low-Income Seniors with Removing Dangerous, Fallen and/or Damaged Trees

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee forwards the item to City Council without recommendation, as the motion to adopt the item lost.

 

Origin

(November 6, 2013) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak

Summary

Seniors on low incomes can sometimes face the financial burden of having to remove trees that pose a danger and/or have fallen on their property due to a variety circumstances outside of their control. The safe removal of these dangerous trees is vital for the public good.   The failure to remove damaged trees can pose a danger to residents and property as well as lead to an increased risk of infestation from invasive species.

 

It is good public policy that the City of Toronto assists low-income seniors with removing such trees by reducing the financial burden.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 6, 2013) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak on Assisting Low-Income Seniors with Removing Dangerous, Fallen and/or Damaged Trees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-64333.pdf

Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 28

PG28.2 - Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Amendments to the Official Plan for Economic Health and Employment Lands Policies and Designations and Recommendations on Conversion Requests

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG28.2b with recommendations)

The General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG28.2c for information)

The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG28.2d with recommendations)

City Planning has submitted a presentation on this Item (PG28.2e)

Communications PG28.2.226 to PG28.2.280 have been submitted on this Item

Will be considered at 2:00 pm Monday December 16

Bill 1805 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

 

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Official Plan Amendment No. 231 appended as Attachment No. 1 to the report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning (November 5, 2013) by:

 

a.         Modifying proposed Site and Area Specific Policy 1 in Chapter 6, Section 14, the Garrison Common North Secondary Plan, by adding the words 'the easterly property line of 2'  after the words and numerals '70 m. from' in section c and adding the words 'Quality Meats at' after the words 'employees of' in section d (i). 

 

b.         Modifying proposed Site and Area Specific Policy 4 in Chapter 6, Section 14, the Garrison Common North Secondary Plan by adding the words 'Consideration of''  at the beginning of subparagraph b(iii) before the word 'Space' and by making the  word 'Space' lower case. 

 

c.         Modifying proposed Site and Area Specific Policy 8 in Chapter 6, Section 14, the Garrison Common North Secondary Plan by  deleting the word 'provided' in subparagraph b and replacing it with the word 'considered'.

 

d.         Modifying proposed Chapter 7 Site and Area Specific Policy 212 by replacing Policy 3a with the following:

 

"a.        Parking that supports the employment uses and residential uses which may be approved either at grade or in a structure." 

 

e.         Modifying proposed Chapter 7 Site and Area Specific Policy 386 by adding the following sentence at the end of paragraph g:

 

'Automobile dealerships with more than 6,000 square metres of retail gross floor area are permitted at 243 to 255 Consumers Road and 165 Yorkland Boulevard provided such dealerships are located in multi-storey buildings.'

 

f.          Modifying proposed Chapter 7 Site and Area Specific Policy 414 by deleting the first sentence and section a and replacing it with the following:

 

'In any zoning by-law permitting the development of residential uses on the subject site the owner shall be required to:

 

a.         provide employment space in the new building equivalent to the total gross floor area of the ground floor of the new building.'

 

 g.        Adding a new Site and Area Specific Policy No. 448 for lands known municipally in 2012 as 4925 and 5201 Dufferin Street as follows after proposed Site and Area Specific Policy 447:

 

"448.   4925 and 5201 Dufferin Street

 

Branches of community colleges and universities are permitted.  All forms of residential uses, including those associated with a community college or university, are not permitted."

 

(See report (November 18, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning for map.)

 

 h.        Modifying Map 2, Structure Map found in Appendix 1 of the report (November 5, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to proposed Official Plan Amendment 231 by adding an Avenue overlay to the lands designated as Mixed Use Area on the east and west sides of Victoria Park Avenue south of Sheppard Avenue East.

 

i.          Deleting Maps 13, 14, 33, 34, 43 and 45 from Appendix 2 to proposed Official Plan Amendment 231 and replacing them with the Maps appended to the supplementary report (November 18, 2013) from theChief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as Attachment 1.

 

j.          With respect to 100 Miranda Avenue:

 

i        Modifying Map 23 to designate the lands known municipally as 100 Miranda Avenue from Core Employment Areas to General Employment Areas.

 

ii.         Modifying Site and Area Specific Policy No. 390 shown in Clause 15 to include the lands known municipally as 100 Miranda Avenue.

 

k.         Modifying Clause 15 to include a new Site and Area Specific Policy for the lands known municipally as 130 Bentworth Avenue and 109 Cartwright Avenue as follows:

 

"xx     130 Bentworth Avenue and 109 Cartwright Avenue

 

Schools are permitted provided the owner submits a study of noise, odour, dust and other industrial related impacts of nearby uses to the satisfaction of the City to determine appropriate design and separation distances of school uses from nearby impactful industries and the abutting City yard, and the school uses are developed in accordance with the recommendations of the study."

 

l         With respect to 1381 Castlefield Avenue:

 

i.          Modifying Map 23 to designate the lands known municipally as 1381 Castlefield Avenue from Core Employment Areas to General Employment Areas.

 

ii.         Modifying Site and Area Specific Policy No. 390 shown in Clause 15 to include the lands known municipally as 1381 Castlefield Avenue.

 

m.        With respect to 30 Tippett Road:

 

i.          Modifying Site and Area Specific Policy No. 387 shown in Clause 15 to exclude the lands at 30 Tippett Road that are subject to Official Plan Amendment Application File No. 11 312374 NNY 10 OZ. 

 

ii.         Modifying Map 2 of Appendix 1 to designate the lands at 30 Tippett Road that are subject to Official Plan Amendment Application File No. 11 312374 NNY 10 OZ  as an “Avenue”.

 

iii.        Modifying Map 14 of Appendix 2 to designate the lands at 30 Tippett Road that are subject to Official Plan Amendment Application File No. 11 312374 NNY 10 OZ as “Mixed Use Areas”.

 

n.         Modifying Site and Area Specific Policy No. 441 by deleting No. 441 (a) and (b) and replacing with:

 

"1.        That Chapter 7, site and area specific policies be amended to allow light employment and residential uses within the site known as 290 Old Weston Road area specific policy 441." 

 

o.         Modifying Site and Area Specific Policy No. 439 by deleting "11" and replacing with "15".

 

p.         Modifying Site and Area Specific Policy No. 154 to include the lands known municipally in 2013 as 50 Wade Avenue and 8, 15, and 33 Jenet Avenue.

 

q.         Modifying Map 42 in Appendix 1 to redesignate the lands known municipally in 2013 as 17-21 Peel Avenue from Parks and Open Space Area/Parks to Mixed Use Areas.

 

r.          Deleting the proposed Site and Area Specific Policy 424 in Official Plan Amendment No. 231 and replacing it with the following: 

 

"424.      11 Peel Avenue

 Residential uses are only permitted provided the following conditions of redevelopment are met:

 

a.          A minimum density of one times the area of the lot of non-residential uses must be provided as part of any redevelopment of the lot.

 

b.          A minimum density of 0.34 times the area of the lot of non-residential, non-retail uses must be provided as part of any redevelopment of the lot.

 

c.         A commercial parking garage does not count towards the non-residential or non-retail uses as described in (a) and (b) above.

 

d.          The maximum gross floor area of any one retail store on the site (including back of house activities) is 2,665 square metres.

 

e.          Publicly accessible pedestrian connections through the site to allow access from Gladstone Avenue to Dufferin Street must be provided.

 

f.           No new shadowing on properties designated as Neighbourhoods is permitted on the spring and fall equinoxes beyond the as-of-right zoning as of October 1, 2013.

 

g.          The site must provide direct pedestrian access to Queen Street West."

 

s.          With respect to 299 Campbell Avenue:

 

i.          Modifying Map 2 in Appendix 1 to delete the lands known municipally as 299 Campbell Avenue from 'Employment Areas'.

 

ii.         Modifying Map 18 in Appendix 2 of Attachment 1 to redesignate the lands located at 299 Campbell Avenue to Mixed Use Areas.

 

iii.        Deleting Proposed Site and Area Specific Policy 421 in Official Plan Amendment No. 231 and replacing with the following:

 

"421.    299 Campbell Avenue

 

Residential uses on the site will be permitted providing the following requirements are met:

 

a.         Pedestrian and vehicular access to the site known as 1453 Dupont Street must be maintained.

b.         A minimum of 1,210 square metres of non-residential GFA is provided on the site.

c.          A minimum of 930 square metres of the non-residential space will be dedicated for use by a community facility.

d.          A maximum of 22,950 square metres of residential GFA may be provided on the site.

e.         The maximum height of any building on the site is the lesser of 47 metres or 12 storeys, including all mechanical equipment.

f.          The proposed building provides appropriate transition to the Neighbourhoods to the south." 

 

t.          With respect to 6 Lloyd Avenue:

 

i.          Deleting the staff recommendation with respect to 6 Lloyd Avenue and replacing with the following:

              

               "Based on the criteria in the Growth Plan, the Provincial Policy Statement and the Official Plan policies, Council convert the northern two thirds of the lands known as 6 Lloyd Avenue from Employment Areas and redesignate them to Mixed Use Areas and retain the southern one third of the existing employment lands at 6 Lloyd Avenue by designating them General Employment Areas.

 

ii.         Modifying Map 2 in Appendix 1 to delete the northern two-thirds of 6 Lloyd Avenue from the area shown as an Employment Area.

 

iii.        Modifying Map 33 in Appendix 1 by redesignating the northern two thirds of 6 Lloyd Avenue from Core Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas.  The remaining one third of the lands are to remain designated as General Employment Area.

 

iv.        Adding a new Site and Area Specific Policy 447 for the lands municipally known as 6 Lloyd in 2012 to:

 

a.         Require a minimum of 4,000 square metres of commercial and/or office space be constructed on the southerly one third of the lands municipally known in 2012 as 6 Lloyd Avenue and that this development occur:

 

1.         prior to or concurrently with, any residential development on the remainder of the lands.

 

2.          along at least 50% of the Lloyd Avenue frontage;

 

3.         at a minimum height of 10m;

 

4.        permitted uses on the southerly one third of the lands include arts school, creative arts studio, art gallery, theatre, office, retail outlet, farmer's market, museum and restaurant/cafe.

 

b.         Secure the 4,000 square metres of commercial and/or office space to be constructed on the southerly one third of the lands municipally known in 2012 as 6 Lloyd Avenue by way of a Section 37 Agreement and/or Plan of Subdivision, or any other means determined by the City.

 

c.         Permit residential uses to a maximum building height of 16.5 metres and subject to a Holding ("H") symbol on the northerly two thirds of the lands municipally known in 2012 as 6 Lloyd Avenue, provided any residential building is set back a minimum of 30 metres from the adjacent rail corridor.  The Holding symbol shall apply only to the northerly two thirds of the land.

 

d.         Enactment of a Zoning By-law that incorporates a Holding ("H") symbol defining and incorporating the conditions that must be satisfied prior to the removal of the Holding ("H") symbol.

 

u.         Modifying proposed Chapter 7, Site and Area Specific Policies, by adding Site and Area Specific Policy No. 435 for the lands known municipally in 2012 as 1891 Eglinton Avenue East, as follows:

 

"435. 1891 Eglinton Avenue East

 

a.         Development of lands for residential uses on the Mixed Use Areas-designated portion of the site will include employment uses including office space having a minimum gross floor area of 6,000 square metres or 5 per cent of the total gross floor area of residential uses, whichever is smaller.

 

b.         Employment uses on the portion of the site designated General Employment Areas, shown as "Parcel A", will be compatible with adjacent residential uses.

 

c.         A feasibility analysis and impact assessment as per Section 4.10.3 of the province's D-6 Guidelines for Compatibility Between Industrial Facilities and Sensitive Land Uses is to be completed and necessary mitigation measures are to be incorporated into the development design for residential and other sensitive uses, to the satisfaction of the City."

 

v.         With respect to 1001 Ellesmere Road:

 

i.          Modifying Map 2 in Appendix 1 to delete the eastern half of the lands known municipally as 1001 Ellesmere Road from 'Employment Areas' 

 

ii.         Modifying Map 17 in Appendix 2 to re-designate the eastern half of the lands known municipally as 1001 Ellesmere Road to Mixed Use Areas. 

 

iii.        Adding a Site and Area Specific Policy for the lands at 1001 Ellesmere Road, as follows:

 

a.         Employment uses on the portion of the site designated General Employment Areas will be compatible with adjacent residential and other sensitive uses;

 

b.         Residential uses on the portion of the site designated Mixed Use Areas will be compatible with the new residential development east of GO/ LRT corridor, in terms of height, massing and the provision of landscaped space;

 

c.         Residential uses will be appropriately set back and buffered from the GO/ SRT corridor to the satisfaction of the City;

 

d.         A feasibility analysis and impact assessment as per Section 4.10.3 of the province's D-6 Guidelines for Compatibility Between Industrial Facilities and Sensitive Land Uses is to be completed and necessary mitigation measures will be incorporated into the development design for residential and other sensitive uses, to the satisfaction of the City; and

 

e.         Development of the site will create an attractive and comfortable public realm along the Ellesmere Road (service road) and enhance accessibility to public transit. 

 

w.        Modifying proposed Site and Area Specific Policy 430 as follows:

 

i.          Add a further subsection to Policy No. 430 to read:

 

“Access, parking, servicing and amenities may be shared between Area A and Area B without amendment to this Plan”

 

ii.         Amend proposed Land Use Map 40 and the map within Site and Area Specific Policy 430 to shift the boundary between the Core Employment Area designation and the Neighbourhoods Areas designation as shown on the attached schedule (see attached map).  Such that the lands municipally known as 811 Islington Avenue will remain as Core Employment Areas, and that lands municipally known as 145 Evans Avenue be redesignated Neighbourhoods 

 

x.         With respect to 22 Metropolitan Road:

 

i.            Modifying the Urban Structures Map (Map No. 2 in Appendix 1) to remove lands known municipally in 2012 as 22 Metropolitan Road from "Employment Areas";

 

ii.         Modifying the Land Use Map (Map No. 16 in Appendix 2) to redesignate the 22 Metropolitan Road lands from "Core Employment Areas" to "Mixed Use Areas";

 

iii.        Modifying proposed Chapter 7 of the Official Plan Site and Area Specific Policies by adding a Site and Area Specific Policy for the lands known in 2012 as 22 Metropolitan Road subject to the following:

 

a.         Mixed use developments are permitted subject to a development framework being developed to the satisfaction of the City which sets out public streets, pedestrian connections, blocks, densities and building heights and provides appropriate community facilities and services.

 

b.         First phase of the site redevelopment will include a hotel development which will contain a minimum of 201 hotel rooms

 

c.         A feasibility analysis and impact assessment as per Section 4.10.3 of the province's D-6 Guideline for Compatibility Between Industrial Facilities and Sensitive Land Uses is to be completed and necessary mitigation measures are to be incorporated into the development design for residential and other sensitive uses, to the satisfaction of the Ministry of the Environment or a delegated authority.  

 

d.         Subsequent phases of the site's redevelopment, include that a minimum of fifty percent of the gross floor area to be developed is to be used for non-residential uses of which at least 5700 square metres is for office uses and that office and commercial will be constructed in advance of, or concurrently with the residential uses.

 

2.         City Council redesignate the lands known as the "Mimico Triangle" and the Judson street portion to a Regeneration Areas designation. 

 

3.         Based on the criteria in the Growth Plan, the Provincial Policy Statement and the Official Plan policies, City Council retain a portion of the lands at 564-580 Evans Avenue and 24 The East Mall, as shown on the applicant’s map attached to the letter (November 19, 2013) from Barry A. Horosko, Brattys, Barristers and Solicitors, as Core Employment Areas and redesignate the other portion as Mixed Use Areas.

 

4.         With respect to 630 Kipling Avenue and 3 Queensway Lions Court:

 

a.         Based on the criteria in the Growth Plan, the Provincial Policy Statement and the Official Plan policies, City Council redesignate the southern half of the lands at 630 Kipling and 3 Queensway Lions Court to General Employment Areas, the northern half of the lands Mixed Use Areas, and the balance of the block bounded by the F.G. Gardiner Expressway, The Queensway, Kipling Avenue, and Queensway Lions Court as Mixed Use Areas.

 

b.         That a Site and Area Specific policy be added to require a buffer and any required environmental mitigation measures including noise, vibration and odour between any sensitive land use and the existing Employment Area to the west. 

 

5.          With respect to 1306-1310 The Queensway:

 

a.         Based on the criteria in the Growth Plan, the Provincial Policy Statement and the Official Plan policies, City Council redesignate the lands at 1306 -1310 The Queensway as Mixed Use Areas.

 

b.         That a Site Specific Policy be added to require a buffer and any required environmental mitigation measures including noise, vibration and odour between any sensitive land use and the existing Employment Area to the west.

 

6.         City Council determine that the lands at 30 Tippett Road that are subject to Official Plan Amendment Application File No. 11 312374 NNY 10 OZ, to be exempt from Site and Area Specific Policy No. 387 and from the City’s Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Employment Lands.

 

7.         City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the proposed Official Plan Amendment appended as Attachment No. 1 of the report (November 5, 2013), as amended by Recommendations 1-6 above, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 

 

 8.        City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the proposed Official Plan Amendment as may be required. 

 

9.         City Council declare by resolution to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing that this Official Plan Amendment:

 

a.         conforms with Provincial Plans or does not conflict with them;

b.         has regard to the matters of Provincial Interest listed in Section 2 of the Planning Act; and

c.         is consistent with policy statements issued under subsection 3.1 of the Planning Act. 

 

10.       City Council adopt the recommendations pertaining to the conversion requests. 

 

11.       City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to complete the processing of the site specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications filed by the applicant respecting the lands at 30 Tippett Road , which processing should not in any way be affected by the Municipal Comprehensive Review of Employment Lands. 

 

12.       City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to present the findings of the Tippet Road Area Planning Study presently underway to the North York Community Council in early 2014 with regards to site and area specific policy, including the application filed for 9 Tippet Road.

 

13.       City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to continue the community consultation process on the revitalization study for the Mimico GO Station Triangle area, to commence in January 2014.  The intent of the community consultation process is to discuss and determine, with the local community, area businesses and the Ward Councillor, the following:

 

a        improvements to vehicular access within the area for the movement of goods and employees;

 

b        public realm enhancements to reduce conflicts between pedestrians and vehicles;

 

c        provision of amenities within the area to create an attractive environment for existing and new employment uses; and

 

d        improved pedestrian and vehicular access to the Mimico GO Station, including strategies for parking and pick-up and drop-off.

 

14.       City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in light of the location of 3710 and 3750 Chesswood Drive to the extended Yonge-University-Spadina Subway, and given the opportunities to provide for intensification along rapid transit corridors for both residential and office development, to include these lands in any future review of land use in the vicinity of rapid transit.

 

15.       City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to review the terms of reference for the proposed Dupont Study with local Residents' Associations and the local Councillor before issuing an RFP to hire a consultant to do the study.

 

16.       City Council urgently request the Province of Ontario to bring forward, at the earliest possible date, regulations pertaining to conditional zoning powers under the City of Toronto Act and the Planning Act that include the powers for municipalities to zone for a minimum required amount of office space within provincially identified Urban Growth Centres and within 500 metres of a rapid transit station.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

 

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.         requested the following to report directly to Council:

 

a.         the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, on the economic impact and overall value to the City's economy generated by businesses located within lands currently designated employment areas and the impacts of the conversion proposals.

 

b.         the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on incentives that could be added to the office replacement policies, such as but not limited to:

 

-           Stratified zoning

-           Excluding office space from inclusion in the calculation of density

 

c.         the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, on the submissions and requests made in relation to the following properties:

 

-           Errors on Map 39 for properties on North Queen Street;

-           158 Parklawn Road

 

d.         the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, on the cumulative impact of all conversions of employment lands to non-employment uses which have been recommended by the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

 

2.         referred the following motion by Councillor Colle to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for a report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

"That:

 

1.         The Finch West Corridor that links the Emery Village BIA with the Employment Zone at Dufferin-Finch, and also access to the 400 Highway, be given special designation, and that any future roadway design, including subways, LRT or other Metrolinx project, ensure that the needs for industrial truck movement within and connecting the employment areas, are well taken into consideration, and will not be compromised.

 

2.         Further, that staff be requested to review any changes with respect to zoning, transportation planning and operations necessary to maintain and enhance the transportation corridor along Finch to ensure it meets commercial and truck transportation needs.  Also, to explore and make recommendations for any additional measures and options (such as subways, ring roads, underground sections, designated truck lands, etc) and to place appropriate consideration or priority on the needs identified"

 

The Planning and Growth Management Committee held a statutory public meeting on November 21, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

 

Origin

(November 5, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

After extensive public consultation, this report presents a proposed Official Plan amendment that includes new Official Plan policies, land use designations and mapping pertaining to the City's economic health and employment lands. 

 

This report to be considered at a Special Public Meeting under Section 26 of the Planning Act contains final recommendations regarding the Official Plan /Municipal Comprehensive Reviews of Toronto's Employment Lands. 

 

The key elements of the recommended Official Plan amendment is to maintain and grow a strong and diverse economy by:

 

1.         Stimulating the growth of new office space and maintaining current concentrations of office space near rapid transit;

2.         Preserving the majority of the City's Employment Areas for business and economic activities; and

3.         Accommodating the growth of the retail and institutional sectors to serve the needs of a growing population.

 

The analysis of the housing capacity has concluded that the City is on track to meet the Growth Plan forecasts for population, and that the City has more than sufficient housing capacity to accommodate the forecasted growth to 2031.

 

Lands within Employment Areas may be converted and designated for non-employment uses only during a Municipal Comprehensive Review.  The City has received approximately 125 requests/applications to convert lands designated as Employment Areas for non-employment uses.  The final recommendations on conversion requests/applications received prior to May 31, 2013 forms part of this report and are appended as Attachment 2.  One-third of the sites subject to conversion requests/applications are proposed to permit non-employment uses.  These sites comprise only 15 per cent of the total land area subject to conversion requests/applications.  

 

Approval of the recommendations in this report would preserve 97 per cent of Toronto's Employment Areas for current and future business and economic activities to grow and provide jobs within the City.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 5, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, on Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Amendments to the Official Plan for Economic Health and Employment Lands Policies and Designations and Recommendations on Conversion Requests
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-63573.pdf
(November 5, 2013) Attachment 1 - Proposed Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-63574.pdf
(November 5, 2013) Attachment 2 - Final Recommendations for Requests/Applications for Conversion of Employment Areas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-63575.pdf
(October 10, 2013) Notice of Special Public Meeting on Proposed Official Plan Amendment Pertaining to Economic Health and Employment Lands Policies and Designations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-63563.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Presentation on Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Amendments to the Official Plan for Economic Health and Employment Lands Policies and Designations and Recommendations on Conversion Requests
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64282.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 12, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Amendments to the Official Plan for Economic Health and Employment Lands Policies and Designations and Recommendations for Conversion Requests (PG28.2b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64864.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Economic Value of the City's Employment Lands (PG28.2c)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64931.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on 158, 164 and 181 Sterling Road - OMB Mediation (PG28.2d)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65186.pdf
(December 16, 2013) Planning for a Strong and Diverse Economy - Presentation from the Program Manager, Policy and Research, City Planning (PG28.2e)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65224.pdf

Speakers

Charles Dime, VP Marketing, Toronto Research Chemicals Inc.
Jason Locklin and Steven Tinker, Bombardier Aerospace
Barry Horosko Ralph Chiodo and John Znacko, Brattys LLP (Submission Filed)
Caterina Facciolo, Brattys LLP
Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of 22 properties (Submission Filed)
Al Brezina, Executive Director, South Etobicoke Industrial Employers' Association (Submission Filed)
Paul Scrivener and Paul Johnston, Director of External Relations, Toronto Industry Network (Submission Filed)
Jeffery L. Davies, Davies Howe Partners LLP
John Dawson, McCarthy Tétrault LLP on behalf of Building Industry and Land Development Association (Submission Filed)
Dennis Wood, Wood Bull LLP
Todd Kostal, Director of Purchasing and Logistics, Atlantic Packaging Products Ltd (Submission Filed)
John McDermott, McDermott and Associates Limited (Submission Filed)
David McKay, MHBC Planning on behalf of 3710 and 3750 Chesswood Drive (Submission Filed)
Jean Roy, Canadian Fuels Association (Submission Filed)
Deborah Alexander, Senior Planner, Weston Consulting (Submission Filed)
Frank Rotundo, on behalf of Junction Lofts Inc.
Joy Seth
Reggie Modlich, Toronto Women's City Alliance (Submission Filed)
Zygmunt Uznanski
Mel Winch, Winch Planning and Development Services
Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP
Ryan Guetter, on behalf of Craft Development Corporation and Queensway Audi (Submission Filed)
Patrick MacDonald, Solicitor, Cassels Brock
Richard E. Rotman, Friends of the Junction
Alex Miller and Stephanie Minna Cass, Vice President, Integrated Supply Chain, Mondelez Canada Inc.
Amber Stewart, Amber Stewart Law
Tim Lambrinos, Board Member, Emery Village
Louie Santoguida, President, Stanton Renassance
Daniel Artenosi, Partner, Overland LLP
John Cartwright, President, Toronto and York Region Labour Council
Councillor Thompson
Councillor Grimes
Councillor Pasternak
Councillor Palacio
Councillor Augimeri
Deputy Mayor Kelly
Councillor Perks
Councillor Bailao
Councillor Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(July 22, 2013) Letter from Valerie Levin, owner of properties 25 and 35 Liberty Street, 51, 61 and 65 Jefferson Avenue, 50 and 58 Atlantic Avenue (PG.Main.PG28.2.1)
(July 12, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 41 Passmore Avenue (PG.Main.PG28.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41026.pdf
(September 23, 2013) Letter from Philip Stewart, MCIP, RPP, Pound and Sterling (PG.Main.PG28.2.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41027.pdf
(October 7, 2013) Letter from Julie Farr, President, Eversoft Fibre & Foam Ltd, regarding properties 88 Sunrise Avenue and 22 Hobson Avenue (PG.Main.PG28.2.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-40355.pdf
(October 18, 2013) Letter from Adam Adamakakis, Executive Director Investments, Ivanhoé Cambridge, regarding properties 3381 and 3389 Steeles Avenue East, 3900 and 4000 Victoria Park Avenue (PG.Main.PG28.2.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-40617.pdf
(November 6, 2013) Letter from Kerigan Kelly, MCIP, RPP, Groundswell Urban Planners Inc., regarding 108 Vine Avenue (PG.Main.PG28.2.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-40974.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, BES, MCIP, RPP, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 22 Metropolitan Road (PG.Main.PG28.2.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41028.pdf
(November 8, 2013) Letter from Shai Altman, President, Wrigley Canada, regarding 1121 Leslie Street (PG.New.PG28.2.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41082.pdf
(November 12, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 21 Broadview Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41113.pdf
(November 6, 2013) Letter from P. Martin Emmons, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, on behalf of the owner of 555 Rexdale Boulevard (PG.New.PG28.2.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41114.pdf
(November 6, 2013) Letter from Rosemarie L. Humphries, Humphries Planning Group Inc., on behalf of owners of 51 Manstor Road (PG.New.PG28.2.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41095.pdf
(November 13, 2013) Letter from Aristotle Christou, The Christou Group, on behalf of owners of 30 Bertrand Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41098.pdf
(November 14, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, on behalf of the owner of 22 Metropolitan Road (PG.New.PG28.2.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41163.pdf
(November 14, 2013) Letter from Mark N. Emery, Weston Consulting (PG.New.PG28.2.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41132.pdf
(November 14, 2013) Letter from Joel D. Farber, Fogler, Rubinoff LLP, on behalf of the owner of 15 North Queen Street (PG.New.PG28.2.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41133.pdf
(November 14, 2013) Letter from Joel D. Farber, Fogler, Rubinoff LLP, on behalf of the owner of 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East (PG.New.PG28.2.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41134.pdf
(November 14, 2013) Letter from Robert A. Dragicevic, Senior Principal, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited, on behalf of Mattamy Staines Limited (PG.New.PG28.2.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41179.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 23 Park Lawn Road and 2150 Lake Shore Boulevard West (PG.New.PG28.2.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41136.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Joel D. Farber, Fogler, Rubinoff LLP, on behalf of the owner of 581-597 Trethewey Drive (PG.New.PG28.2.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41192.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 1235-1255 Lawrence Avenue West and 3-23 Benton Road (PG.New.PG28.2.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41190.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 840 and 860 Dupont Street (PG.New.PG28.2.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41191.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Paul E. Johnston, Johnston Litavski Planning Consultants, on behalf of Mondelez Canada Inc (PG.New.PG28.2.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41193.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Steven A. Zakem, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the Viva Properties Ltd. (PG.New.PG28.2.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41194.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Joel D. Farber, Fogler, Rubinoff LLP, on behalf of the owner of 1001-1037 The Queensway (PG.New.PG28.2.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41195.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of the owners of 328, 330, 332, 344, 358, 374 and 388 Dupont Street (PG.New.PG28.2.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41196.pdf
(November 16, 2013) Letter from Eric A. Bristow, Director Government & Stakeholder Relations, Canadian Fuels Association (PG.New.PG28.2.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41217.pdf
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Gabriella Kuntz (PG.New.PG28.2.27)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Nancy Ennis (PG.New.PG28.2.28)
(November 17, 2013) Letter from Charles Campbell, Steering Committee for Active 18 Community Association (PG.New.PG28.2.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41220.pdf
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Meghan Price and Eric Williams (PG.New.PG28.2.30)
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP on behalf of the owner of 65-81 McCormack Street, (PG.New.PG28.2.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41275.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Lindsay Dale-Harris, Bousfields Inc., on behalf of the owners of 865 York Mills Road (PG.New.PG28.2.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41257.pdf
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Dr. Ursula Kasperowski (PG.New.PG28.2.33)
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 87 Ethel Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41277.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 430-444 Dufferin Street and 41 Alma Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.35)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41282.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Deborah Alexander, Weston Consulting, on behalf of owners of Lots 1, 3, 5, 6 & 7 of the Mimico Go Triangle (PG.New.PG28.2.36)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41278.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of the owners of 75 Rexdale Boulevard (PG.New.PG28.2.37)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41283.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Nima Kia, The Lakeshore Group, on behalf of Sarika Investments Limited (PG.New.PG28.2.38)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41304.pdf
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Kelly Dias (PG.New.PG28.2.39)
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Joel D. Farber, Fogler, Rubinoff LLP, on behalf of the owner of 950 Dupont Street (PG.New.PG28.2.40)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41418.pdf
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Monica Kulling (PG.New.PG28.2.41)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Antonio de Melo (PG.New.PG28.2.42)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Joe N. Nobrega, President, Wenderly Park Community Association (PG.New.PG28.2.43)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Maria B (PG.New.PG28.2.44)
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 1220-1230 Dundas St East (PG.New.PG28.2.45)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41445.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 3500 - 3520 McNicoll Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.46)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41446.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 29, 31 and 31A Passmore Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.47)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41447.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 41 Passmore Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.48)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41448.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 109 - 147 Eddystone Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.49)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41449.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 3241, 3251 and 3261 Kennedy Road and 19, 23, 25 and 27 Passmore Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.50)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41450.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, BES, MCIP, RPP, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 1681 Eglinton Avenue East and 24 and 30 Mobile Drive (PG.New.PG28.2.51)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41451.pdf
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Darien Taylor (PG.New.PG28.2.52)
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of 16 property owners (PG.New.PG28.2.53)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41468.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from David A. McKay, Partner, MHBC Planning Urban Design and Landscape Architecture on behalf of Grazia MAria Antinori and D & L Group Limited (PG.New.PG28.2.54)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41469.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Gerald S. Swinkin, Blake, Cassels and Graydon LLP, on behalf of the owner of 72 Sterling Road (PG.New.PG28.2.55)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41470.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the owners of 35 Cawthra Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.56)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41541.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Lorne Ross Planning Services on behalf of the owners of 3266-3270 Midland Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.57)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41542.pdf
(November 17, 2013) Letter from Lorne Ross Planning Services on behalf of 844940 Ontario Inc. (PG.New.PG28.2.58)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41543.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Barry A. Horosko, Brattys LLP, on behalf of the owner of 145 Evans Avenue and 811 Islington Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.59)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41544.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Barry A. Horosko, Brattys LLP, on behalf of the owner of 564-580 Evans Avenue and 24 East Mall (PG.New.PG28.2.60)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41545.pdf
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Barry A. Horosko, Brattys LLP, on behalf of the owner of 302 and 320-324 Horner Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.61)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41546.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owners of 171 East Liberty Street (PG.New.PG28.2.62)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41547.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Paul Scrivener, Director of External Affairs, Toronto Industry Network (PG.New.PG28.2.63)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41548.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from David A. McKay, MSc, MCIP, RPP, MHBC Planning Urban Deisgn and Landscape Architecture (PG.New.PG28.2.64)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41549.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 944-952 Queen Street West (PG.New.PG28.2.65)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41550.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 4500 Sheppard Avenue East (PG.New.PG28.2.66)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41551.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 151 Nashdene Road (PG.New.PG28.2.67)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41552.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, MCIP, RPP, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 279 Rexdale Boulevard (PG.New.PG28.2.68)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41553.pdf
(November 13, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owners 900, 916 and 920 Caledonia Road (PG.New.PG28.2.69)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41560.pdf
(November 12, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owner 939 Eglinton Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.70)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41561.pdf
(November 13, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owner of 30 Tippet Road (PG.New.PG28.2.71)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41562.pdf
(November 14, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owner of 1891 Eglinton Avenue East (PG.New.PG28.2.72)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41563.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, BES, MCIP, RPP, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 1500 Don Mills Road (PG.New.PG28.2.73)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41564.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, BES, MCIP, RPP, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 1450 Don Mills Road (PG.New.PG28.2.74)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41565.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Tony Volpentesta, MCIP, RPP, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 100 Miranda Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.75)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41566.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Tony Volpentesta, MCIP, RPP, Bousfield Inc. on behalf of owners of 1381 Castlefield Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.76)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41567.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Lorne Ross Planning Services on behalf of the owners of 2150 McNicoll Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.77)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41568.pdf
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from John Black (PG.New.PG28.2.78)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41569.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP, on behalf of the owners of 40 Reading Court (PG.New.PG28.2.79)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41574.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP, on behalf of the owner of 1331 Martin Grove Road (PG.New.PG28.2.80)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41575.pdf
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Nelson Amorim (PG.New.PG28.2.81)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Melanie Vicente, Martin Flavien, Lisette and Joao Vicente (PG.New.PG28.2.82)
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Noni Regan (PG.New.PG28.2.83)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Michael S. Goldberg, MCIP, RPP, Goldberg Group, on behalf of the owner of 731 Eastern Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.84)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41579.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 1071 King Street West (PG.New.PG28.2.85)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41580.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Ryan Atkinson, Atkinson Law, on behalf of the owner of properties on the south side of Drummond Street (PG.New.PG28.2.86)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41581.pdf
(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Ryan Atkinson, Atkinson Law, on behalf of the owner of property at the South East Corner of Judson Street and Islington Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.87)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41584.pdf
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Ryan Atkinson, Atkinson Law, on behalf of the owner of 700 Kipling Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.88)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41582.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the owners 20, 48, 54 and 62 Murray Road and 0 Regent Road (PG.New.PG28.2.89)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41583.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the owner of 299 Campbell Street (PG.New.PG28.2.90)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41585.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Scott Arbuckle and Michael Lipkus, IBI Group, on behalf of 5 properties (PG.New.PG28.2.91)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41586.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the owner of 9 Tippet Road (PG.New.PG28.2.92)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41587.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of Parc Downsview Park Inc and Canada Lands Company Limited (PG.New.PG28.2.93)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41588.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, on behalf of the owners of 1200 Eglinton Avenue East (PG.New.PG28.2.94)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41589.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, on behalf of the owners of 701 - 703 Evans Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.95)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41590.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Jason Park, Dentons Canada LLP, on behalf of the owners of 1001 Ellesmere Road (PG.New.PG28.2.96)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41591.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, on behalf of the owners of 158 Park Lawn Road (PG.New.PG28.2.97)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41592.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Jason Park, Dentons Canada LLP, on behalf of the owners of 743 Warden Avenue and 37 Upton Road (PG.New.PG28.2.98)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41593.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the owners of Liberty Village Area 3 (PG.New.PG28.2.99)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41594.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Jonathan Rodger, Zelinka Priamo Ltd, on behalf of the owner of 12 Properties (PG.New.PG28.2.100)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41595.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Jonathan Rodger, Zelinka Priamo Ltd, on behalf of the owner of 650 Dupont Street (PG.New.PG28.2.101)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41596.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Jonathan Rodger, Zelinka Priamo Ltd, on behalf of the owner of 1020 Islington Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.102)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41597.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Josh Silvers (PG.New.PG28.2.103)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41605.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, on behalf of 15 Brown's Line (PG.New.PG28.2.104)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41606.pdf
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Carina Cojeen (PG.New.PG28.2.105)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Eileen P.K. Costello, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owners of 19 Industrial Street, 51 and 85 Hanna Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.106)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41618.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Nima Kia, Manager, Lakeshore Group, on behalf of the owners of 231 - 1650 The Queensway (PG.New.PG28.2.107)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41619.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of owner of 8 Oak Street (PG.New.PG28.2.108)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41620.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Jason Park, Dentons, on behalf of the owners of 243, 245, 251 and 255 Consumers Road and 165 Yorkland Boulevard (PG.New.PG28.2.109)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41621.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf owner of 300 Middlefield Road (PG.New.PG28.2.110)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41622.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Al Ruggero, Project Manager, Emery Village Business Improvement Area (PG.New.PG28.2.111)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41623.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Mark A. Piel, Dentons, on behalf of The Ontario Conference of the Seventh-day Adventist Church (PG.New.PG28.2.112)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41624.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Submission from Jean Roy, Canadian Fuels Association (PG.New.PG28.2.113)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41625.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Philip Stewart, MCIP, RPP, Pound and Sterling, on behalf of 388 Carlaw Avenue and 10 Dickens Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.114)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41630.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Mark R. Flowers, Davies Howe Partners LLP, on behalf of 328, 330, 332, 344 and 358 Dupont Street (PG.New.PG28.2.115)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41631.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Ornella Richichi, Executive Vice President, Smart Centres, on behalf of 1211 Caledonia Road (PG.New.PG28.2.116)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41632.pdf
(November 17, 2013) Letter from Lorne Ross Planning Services on behalf of the owners of the East Side of Kennedy Road and North of McNicoll (PG.New.PG28.2.117)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41711.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from David C.K. Tang, Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP, on behalf of Toronto Faith Coalition Inc. (PG.New.PG28.2.118)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41648.pdf
(November 21, 2013) E-mail from Roland Kiehne, President, Unifor Local 112 (PG.New.PG28.2.119)
(November 20, 2013) Fax from Tony Cuoto, Dufferin Street Resident (PG.New.PG28.2.120)
(November 21, 2013) Fax from Tony Cuoto, Dufferin Street Resident (PG.New.PG28.2.121)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from James W. Harbell, Stikeman Elliott LLP, on behalf of the owners of 844 Don Mills Road and 1150 Eglington Avenue East (PG.New.PG28.2.122)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41713.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Mike Clark and Luke Pestl, Bellwoods Brewery, on behalf of the owners of 430, 436, 440-444 Dufferin and 41 Alma Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.123)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41745.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from A. Milliken Heisey, Papazian Heisey Myers, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owner of 158 Sterling Road (PG.New.PG28.2.124)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41715.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owners of 57 Spadina Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.125)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41716.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Johanna R. Shapira, Wood Bull LLP, on behalf of the owners of 6464 Yonge Street and 45 Overlea Boulevard (PG.New.PG28.2.126)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41717.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Barry Morrison, Barry J. Morrison and Associates Ltd., on behalf of the owners of the Southwest Corner of Morning side Avenue and McNicoll Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.127)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41718.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Michael Melling , Davies Howe Partners LLP, on behalf of the owner of 99 Atlantic Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.128)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41714.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Tony Volpentesta, Bousfields Inc., on behalf of the owners of 1162 Caledonia Road (PG.New.PG28.2.129)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41659.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, on behalf of the owners of 189 Milner Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.130)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41660.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from C.J. Tzekas, WeirFoulds LLP, on behalf of the owner of 30 Booth Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.131)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41721.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from T.E. Austin MacMurdo, Corporate Lands Manager, St. Marys Cement Inc. (Canada) (PG.New.PG28.2.132)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41719.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Cynthia MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owner of 592 Sherbourne Street (PG.New.PG28.2.133)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41723.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from James W. Harbell, Stikeman Elliot LLP, on behalf of the owners of 35 Cawthra Avenue and 6 Lloyd Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.134)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41722.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 2200 Islington Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.135)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41720.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from James W. Harbell, Stikeman Elliot LLP, on behalf of the owners of 35 Cawthra Avenue and 404 Old Weston Road (PG.New.PG28.2.136)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41741.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, on behalf of the owner of 850-858 York Mills Road (PG.New.PG28.2.137)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41742.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, on behalf of the owner of 80 Bloor Street West (PG.New.PG28.2.138)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41743.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from James W. Harbell, Stikeman Elliot LLP, on behalf of the owners of 35 Cawthra Avenue and 290 Old Weston Road (PG.New.PG28.2.139)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41725.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Philip Stewart, Pound and Stewart Associates Limited, on behalf of the owner of 130 and 180 Yorkland Boulevard (PG.New.PG28.2.140)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41744.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Steven J. O'Melia, Miller Thompson, on behalf of Roman Catholic Episcopal Corporation for the Diocese of Toronto (PG.New.PG28.2.141)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41726.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from James W. Harbell, Stikeman Elliot LLP, on behalf of the owners of 2 Champagne Drive and 1107 Finch Avenue West (PG.New.PG28.2.142)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41727.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Todd Kostal, Director Packaging and Logistics, Atlantic Packaging Products Ltd. (PG.New.PG28.2.143)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41728.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from John A.R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owners of 5799-5915 Yonge Street, 45 and 53 Cummer Avenue and 46 and 47 Averill Crescent (PG.New.PG28.2.144)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41746.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Al Brezina, Executive Director, South Etobicoke Industrial Employer's Association (PG.New.PG28.2.145)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41729.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Cynthia MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owner of 28 Bathurst Street (PG.New.PG28.2.146)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41730.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Amy Shepherd, Associate, IBI Group on behalf of the owners of 1453 Dupont Street (PG.New.PG28.2.147)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41731.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from John A.R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owners of 215, 178 - 180 Queen's Quay East (PG.New.PG28.2.148)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41732.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from John A.R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owners of 2135 Sheppard Avenue East (PG.New.PG28.2.149)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41733.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Reggie Modlich on behalf of Planning Team , Toronto Women's City Alliance (PG.New.PG28.2.150)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41734.pdf
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Randal Dickie, President, Urban Growth Inc. (PG.New.PG28.2.151)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Signe Leisk, Cassels Brock Lawyers, on behalf of the owners of 4925 Dufferin Street and 1440 Don Mills Road (PG.New.PG28.2.152)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41736.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the owners of 17-21 Peel Avenue and 11 Peel Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.153)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41737.pdf
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Sudabeh Mashkuri and Angelo Sartorelli (PG.New.PG28.2.154)
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Yahya Abbas, President and CEO, Ya Ya Foods (PG.New.PG28.2.155)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Sidonia J. Loiacono, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owners of 206 Lansing Square and 2550 Victoria Park Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.156)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41740.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Michael Stewart, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of the owner of 25 Ontario Street (PG.New.PG28.2.157)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41747.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 314-326 Davenport Road (PG.New.PG28.2.158)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41748.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Doug Quick, Dentons Canada LLP, on behalf of the owner of 171 East Liberty Street (PG.New.PG28.2.159)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41749.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from John A.R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of Deltera Inc. (PG.New.PG28.2.160)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41761.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Michael Bissett, Bousfields Inc., on behalf of the owners of 462 Eastern Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.161)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41762.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Michael Bissett, Bousfields Inc., on behalf of the owners of 459 Eastern Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.162)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41763.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from N. Jane Pepino, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owners of 3381 and 3389 Steeles Avenue East and 3900 and 4000 Victoria Park Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.163)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41764.pdf
(November 21, 2013) E-mail from Christopher J. Tanzola, Overland LLP, on behalf of the owner of 789 Don Mills Road (PG.New.PG28.2.164)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41765.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Scott Dobson (PG.New.PG28.2.165)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Cynthia A. MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owners of 10, 11 and 25 Ordance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.166)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41767.pdf
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Brian Moreira and Tamara Hurtado (PG.New.PG28.2.167)
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Diane Lopes (PG.New.PG28.2.168)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owners of 362 Wallace Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.169)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41770.pdf
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Diane Lopes (PG.New.PG27.2.170)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Paul Lowes, Sorensen Gravely Lowes Planning Associates Inc., on behalf of the owners of 50 Wilson Heights Boulevard (PG.New.PG28.2.171)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41750.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Paul Lowes, Sorensen Gravely Lowes Planning Associates Inc., on behalf of the Build Toronto Inc. (PG.New.PG28.2.172)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41751.pdf
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Richard Fofana (PG.New.PG28.2.173)
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Bill Ikosipentarhos (PG.New.PG28.2.174)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Cory Estrela, Devry Smith Frank LLP, on behalf of 24 Progress Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.175)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41755.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Cindy Lopes (PG.New.PG28.2.176)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Tom Lodu, Secretary, Global Kingdom Ministries Inc. (PG.New.PG28.2.177)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41757.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton. Ward 19 -Trinity Spadina (PG.New.PG28.2.178)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41758.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kyra Trainor, President, Mimico Residents Association (PG.New.PG28.2.179)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41781.pdf
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from John Cartwright , President, Toronto and York Region Labour Council (PG.New.PG28.2.180)
(November 20, 2013) Petition from Signed by 15 Residents (PG.New.PG28.2.181)
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Philippe Blanchard (PG.New.PG28.2.182)
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Mandy Pereira (PG.New.PG28.2.183)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Michael Gingerich (PG.New.PG28.2.184)
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Ryan Moore, MHBC Planning, on behalf of the owners of 275 - 279 Belfield Road and 285 Belfield Road (PG.New.PG28.2.185)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41787.pdf
(November 21, 2013) E-mail from Jennifer Rooney on behalf of The Wood Studio Co-operative (PG.New.PG28.2.186)
(November 21, 2013) Submission from Amber Stewart (PG.New.PG28.2.187)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41789.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of the owner of 587-599 Yonge Street, 2-4 Dundonald Street and 7-9 Gloucester Street (PG.New.PG28.2.188)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41790.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Kevin Putnam, Junction Triangle Library Expansion Committee (PG.New.PG28.2.189)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41791.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird and Berlis LLP, on behalf of KingSett Capital Inc. (PG.New.PG28.2.190)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41792.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Victor Amaral (PG.New.PG28.2.191)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Aldina Pereira (PG.New.PG28.2.192)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Aldina Pereira, owner of 8 and 15 Jenet Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.193)
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak on 4646 Dufferin Street (PG.New.PG28.2.194)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41844.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak on 9 Tippet Road (PG.New.PG28.2.195)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41832.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP on behalf of owner of 15-35 Mercer Street (PG.New.PG28.2.196)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41845.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP on behalf of the owner of 675 Progress Avenue (PG.New.PG28.2.197)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41846.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Submission from Ryan Guetter (PG.New.PG28.2.198)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41833.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP on behalf of Great Gulf (Power) Limited (PG.New.PG28.2.199)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41834.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP on behalf of owners of 401-415 King Street West (PG.New.PG28.2.200)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41847.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP on behalf of 481 Uni Investments Inc. (PG.New.PG28.2.201)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41835.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP on behalf of owner of 1 Eglinton Avenue East (PG.New.PG28.2.202)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41848.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes (PG.New.PG28.2.203)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41836.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Shawn Haggerty, President, UFCW Canada Local 175 (PG.New.PG28.2.204)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41879.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar on behalf of Lamb Development Corp. (PG.New.PG28.2.205)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41837.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis on behalf of the owner of 17-25 Toronto Street and 53-55 Adelaide Street East (PG.New.PG28.2.206)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41850.pdf
(November 21, 2013) E-mail from Amy Rutherford (PG.New.PG28.2.207)
(November 21, 2013) E-mail from Stephane Monnet (PG.New.PG28.2.208)
(November 21, 2013) Letter from John Cartwright, President, Toronto & York Region Council (PG.New.PG28.2.209)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41861.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Paul Bagnariol, owner of 49-53 Judson Street (PG.New.PG28.2.210)
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Salvatore Cofone, President, Queen's Pasta (PG.New.PG28.2.211)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41852.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Peter F. Smith, Bousfield Inc., on behalf of owners of 2225, 2235 and 2255 Sheppard Avenue East (PG.New.PG28.2.212)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41862.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Vincent Crisanti (PG.New.PG28.2.213)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41853.pdf
(November 21, 2013) E-mail from Lynda S. Ryder, Director, National Silicates (PG.New.PG28.2.214)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Michael Bissett, Bousfield Inc., on behalf of the owners of 150 Symes Road (PG.New.PG28.2.215)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41864.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Salvatore Cofone, President, Queen's Pasta (PG.New.PG28.2.216)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41865.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Submission from Jason Locklyn, Director, Government, Public and Community Relations, Bombardier Aerospace (PG.New.PG28.2.217)
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher (PG.New.PG28.2.218)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41855.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Rabbi Yoseph Y. Zaltzman, Senior Rabbi and Founder, Jewish Russian Community Centre of Ontario (PG.New.PG28.2.219)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41866.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Etobicoke York Community Council related to 29 and 145 Judson Street (PG.New.PG28.2.220)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41856.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Letter from Monte Kwinter, MPP, York Centre (PG.New.PG28.2.221)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41857.pdf
(November 21, 2013) Submission from Councillor Cesar Palacio (PG.New.PG28.2.222)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41867.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Michael Thompson (PG.New.PG28.2.223)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41858.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from John A. R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of Building and Land Development Association (BILD) (PG.New.PG28.2.224)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41868.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, on behalf of the owners of the Weston Prince Hotel (PG.New.PG28.2.225)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41859.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(November 28, 2013) Letter from Julius De Ruyter, PMG Planning Consultants, on behalf of the owners of 394 Symington Avenue (CC.Main.PG28.2.226)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42226.pdf
(December 9, 2013) Letter from Michael Bissett, Bousfields Incorporated, on behalf of the owners of 188 Cartwright Avenue (CC.Main.PG28.2.227)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42227.pdf
(November 25, 2013) Letter from P. Martin Emmons, Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, Barristers and Solicitors on behalf of the owners of 555 Rexdale Boulevard (CC.Main.PG28.2.228)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42211.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Letter from Christopher J. Tanzola, Partner, Overland LLP, on behalf of the owners of 789 Don Mills Road (CC.Main.PG28.2.229)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42228.pdf
(December 5, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owners of 95 Queens Quay East (CC.Main.PG28.2.230)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42229.pdf
(December 5, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owners of 33, 35, 50 and 80 Salome Drive (CC.Main.PG28.2.231)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42230.pdf
(December 5, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors on behalf of the owners of 255 Brimley Road, 350 Midwest Road, 45/55 Milliken Boulevard, 36 Overlea Boulevard, 80 Progress Avenue, 111 Progress Avenue, 333 Progress Avenue (CC.Main.PG28.2.232)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42231.pdf
(November 28, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird and Berlis LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owners of 393 Sorauren Avenue and 1947 Dundas Street West (CC.Main.PG28.2.233)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42232.pdf
(November 29, 2013) Letter from Gavin Goebel, Colville Developments, on behalf of the owners of 50-52, 64, 66-68 and 70 Colville Road (CC.Main.PG28.2.234)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42233.pdf
(December 5, 2013) Letter from Barnet H. Kussner, WeirFoulds LLP, on behalf of the owners of 88 Sunrise Avenue and 22 Hobson Avenue (CC.Main.PG28.2.235)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42234.pdf
(December 6, 2013) Letter from Scott Snider, Turkstra Mazza Associates, Lawyers, on behalf of the owner of 109 Ryding Avenue (CC.Main.PG28.2.236)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42235.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, Land Use and Environmental Planning Consultants, on behalf of the owners of 3500-3520 McNicoll Avenue and 83-85 Dynamic Drive (CC.Main.PG28.2.237)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42236.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, Land Use and Environmental Planning Consultants, on behalf of the owners of 29, 31 and 31A, 33 and 41 Passmore Avenue (CC.Main.PG28.2.238)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42237.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, Principal Planner, McDermott and Associates Limited, Land Use and Environmental Planning Consultants, on behalf of the owners of 109-147 Eddystone Avenue (CC.Main.PG28.2.239)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42238.pdf
(December 5, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, Principal Planner, McDermott & Associates Limited, on behalf of 151 Nashdene Road (CC.Supp.PG28.2.240)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42273.pdf
(December 5, 2013) Letter from John McDermott, Principal Planner, McDermott & Associates Limited, on behalf of 279 Rexdale Boulevard (CC.Supp.PG28.2.241)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42274.pdf
(December 10, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of 101 Thorncliffe Park Drive (CC.Supp.PG28.2.242)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42275.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Louis Reznick, on behalf of 670 and 680 Caledonia Road and 250 Bowie Avenue (CC.Supp.PG28.2.243)
(December 11, 2013) Letter from Mark A. Piel, Dentons Canada, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of The Governing Council of the Salvation Army in Canada (CC.Supp.PG28.2.244)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42278.pdf
(July 26, 2013) Submission from IBI Group entitled "Proposed Mixed Use Development at 189 Milner, Toronto", on behalf of Metro Zen (Canada) Inc. (CC.Supp.PG28.2.245)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42292.pdf
(December 10, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of A&W Food Services of Canada Inc., McDonald's Restaurants of Canada Limited, The TDL Group Corporation and Wendy's Restaurants of Canada, as welll as Ontario Restaurant Hotel and Motel Association (CC.Supp.PG28.2.246)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42279.pdf
(December 11, 2013) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of 234 Simcoe Street (CC.Supp.PG28.2.247)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42280.pdf
(December 11, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of 15 Brown's Line (CC.Supp.PG28.2.248)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42281.pdf
(December 11, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of 80 Bloor Street West (CC.Supp.PG28.2.249)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42282.pdf
(December 11, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of 850-858 York Mills Road (CC.Supp.PG28.2.250)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42283.pdf
(December 11, 2013) Letter from James Cox, Director, Real Estate, Canada Lands Company, on behalf of 3621 Dufferin Street (CC.Supp.PG28.2.251)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42284.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Dentons Canada LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of 100 Metropolitan Road (CC.Supp.PG28.2.252)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42285.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Dentons Canada LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of Samuel Sarick Limited and its related company Midland Corporate Centre Limited - various properties (CC.Supp.PG28.2.253)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42286.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Dentons Canada LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada - 225 Rexdale Boulevard and 75 Scarsdale Road (CC.Supp.PG28.2.254)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42287.pdf
(December 9, 2013) Letter from Victor Settino, VP, Commercial Development, Dundee Realty Corporation, on behalf of 2075 Kennedy Road (CC.Supp.PG28.2.255)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42290.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, on behalf of the owners of 672 Dupont Street (CC.Supp.PG28.2.256)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42443.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Letter from James W. Harbell, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors on behalf of the owners of 35 Cawthra Avenue (CC.Supp.PG28.2.257)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42249.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Stephen Popovich, Popovich Associates, regarding land at the northwest corner of The Queensway and North Queen Street (CC.New.PG28.2.258)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43841.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the Canadian Propane Association (CC.New.PG28.2.259)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43842.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of Irving Tissue Corporation - owner of various properties (CC.New.PG28.2.260)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43843.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Doug Alexander, Wing's Food Products, regarding 302 and 320-324 Horner Avenue (CC.New.PG28.2.261)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43844.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, regarding properties at 357 Canartic Drive and 4801 Keele Street (CC.New.PG28.2.262)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43845.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Vito Valela, Director of Real Estate, A. Mantella and Sons Limited, regarding 1020 Islington Aevnue (CC.New.PG28.2.263)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43846.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Cynthia A. MacDougall, Partner, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owner of 383 Sorauren Avenue (CC.New.PG28.2.264)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43847.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Cynthia A. MacDougall, Partner, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owner of 7, 15, 25R, 29 and 39 Queens Quay East (CC.New.PG28.2.265)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43848.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Dorothy Wahl, Senior Legal Counsel, Metrolinx, regarding lands on the south side of Judson Street (CC.New.PG28.2.266)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43849.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Michael S. Polowin, Gowlings, on behalf of the Aga Khan Foundation Canada and the Ismaili Council in Ontario - various properties (CC.New.PG28.2.267)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43850.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Marc Kemerer, Blaney McMurtry, Barristers and Solicitors LLP, on behalf of the owner of 500 Sheppard Avenue East (CC.New.PG28.2.268)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43851.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owner of 60 Birmingham Street (CC.New.PG28.2.269)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43852.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP, on behalf of the owner of 29 Judson Street (CC.New.PG28.2.270)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43853.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Raivo Uukkivi, Cassels Brock Lawyers, on behalf of the owners of 33 Passmore Avenue (CC.New.PG28.2.271)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43854.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Cynthia A. MacDougall, Partner, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of the owner of 3560, 3580 and 3600 Lake Shore Boulevard West (CC.New.PG28.2.272)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43855.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Mark N. Emery, President, Weston Consulting, on behalf of the owner of 630 Kipling Avenue/3 Queensway Lion Court, 1306/1310 The Queensway (CC.New.PG28.2.273)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43879.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Ryan Guetter, Vice President, Weston Consulting, on behalf of the owner of 3875 Keele Street (CC.New.PG28.2.274)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43880.pdf
(December 16, 2013) Letter from Laurie McPherson, Bousfields Inc., on behalf of the owner of 564-580 Evans Avenue and 24 The East Mall (CC.New.PG28.2.275)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43941.pdf
(December 16, 2013) Letter from Tony Volpentesta, Bousfields Inc., on behalf of the owner of 32 and 36 Caledonia Road, 1500, 1536 and 1550 St. Clair Avenue West (CC.New.PG28.2.276)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44068.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Ryan Guetter, Vice President, Weston Consulting, on behalf of the owner of 321 Silver Star Boulevard (CC.New.PG28.2.277)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44069.pdf
(December 16, 2013) Submission from Councillor David Shiner, Ward 24 Willowdale - motions adopted by the Planning and Growth Management Committee that staff did not support (CC.New.PG28.2.278)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44071.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Amber Stewart, Amber Stewart Law, on behalf of the owner of 855 Oxford Street (CC.New.PG28.2.279)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44072.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Al Brezina, Executive Director, South Etobicoke Industrial Employers' Association (CC.New.PG28.2.280)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44288.pdf

2a - Supplementary Report - Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Amendments to the Official Plan for Economic Health and Employment Lands Policies and Designations and Recommendations for Conversion Requests

Origin
(November 18, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
Summary

Following the October 31, 2013 release of the proposed Official Plan Amendment to the public, staff have received numerous letters from representatives of property-owners in response to the proposed Official Amendment.  As a result of staff's review of this correspondence, staff recommend several modifications to the proposed Official Plan Amendment to address some of the matters raised.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 18, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, on Supplementary Report - Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Reviews: Amendments to the Official Plan for Economic Health and Employment Lands Policies and Designations and Recommendations for Conversion Requests
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-63855.pdf

Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 29

PG29.1 - Technical Amendments to By-law 569-2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bills 1760 and 1761 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council add the following regulation 150.50.50.11 titled 'Landscaping Exemptions' as a technical amendment to by-law 569-2013:

 

"150.50.50.11    Landscaping Exemptions 

(1)        Landscaping Exemptions - Existing Buildings, CR and CRE Zones
The requirements of regulation 150.50.50.10(1) do not apply:
(A) to a lawfully existing building; or
(B) to a building in the CR zone or CRE zone."

 

2.         City Council enact zoning by-law amendments substantially in accordance with Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 to the report (November 8, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to each Zoning By-law amendment as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee held a statutory public meeting on December 4, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. 

Origin

(November 8, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

As part of the process of enacting the new City-wide Zoning By-law, the Transition Protocol was established with criteria to determine which properties would be left out of new Zoning By-law. One category in the Protocol refers to sites with complete applications for a zoning by-law amendment. Another involves lands with complete applications for site plan approval. Due to the time required to produce the Zoning By-law Map for the May 7-10, 2013 meeting of City Council, staff were unable to remove sites that had submitted complete applications just prior to the City-wide Zoning By-law enactment on May 9, 2013.

 

This report proposes technical amendments to remove lands from Zoning By-law 569- 2013 that had complete applications and met the Transition Protocol criteria, but were not removed prior to Council enactment. In addition, the correction of a number of minor typographical errors is recommended through this amending by-law.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 8, 2013) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on Technical Amendments to By-law 569-2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64047.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) Notice No. 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64077.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) Notice No. 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64078.pdf

Speakers

Eileen Denny, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc.

Communications (Committee)

(November 29, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers & Solicitors on behalf of the owner of 231-237 College Street and 177-189 Huron Street (PG.New.PG29.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41961.pdf
(December 2, 2013) Letter from Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol, Barristers & Solicitors on behalf of the owner of 431-445 Richmond Street West (PG.New.PG29.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41986.pdf
(November 29, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Harrington, Aird & Berlis LLP, Barristers & Solicitors, on behalf of the owner of 300 Middlefield Road (PG.New.PG29.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-41964.pdf
(December 3, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP on behalf of the owner of 80 Bloor Street West (PG.New.PG29.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-42010.pdf
(December 3, 2013) Letter from Robert G. Doumani, Aird & Berlis LLP on behalf of the owner of 22 Oakmount Road (PG.New.PG29.1.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-42011.pdf
(December 3, 2013) Letter from Susan Rosenthal, Davies Howe Partners LLP on behalf of the owner of 1973 (1955-1991) Victoria Park Avenue (PG.New.PG29.1.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-42018.pdf
(December 3, 2013) Letter from Hilde Reis-Smart, Secretary, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (PG.New.PG29.1.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-42019.pdf
(December 3, 2013) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CORRA) (PG.New.PG29.1.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-42056.pdf
(December 3, 2013) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell (PG.New.PG29.1.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-42057.pdf

PG29.2 - 362 Wallace Avenue - Draft Plan of Subdivision Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (November 13, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (November 13, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to final approval and the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee held a statutory public meeting on December 4, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 13, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This application proposes a new public road running north/south generally from the southern terminus of Edwin Avenue to Wallace Avenue, an extension of Macaulay Avenue to the new road, and the creation of 4 development blocks. Two blocks will be used for residential uses, one will be used for industrial uses and the fourth will be used for a new community facility.

 

This report advises that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision subject to appropriate conditions of approval.

 

This site is also the subject of a Request for Direction report, on the same agenda of the Planning and Growth Management Committee, which will address the Official Plan and Zoning Amendment applications which have been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 13, 2013) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on 362 Wallace Avenue - Draft Plan of Subdivision Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64046.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act) Draft Plan of Subdivision Application No.: 11-286680 STE 18 SB
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64090.pdf

Speakers

Patrick Harrington, Aird & Berlis LLP

Communications (Committee)

(December 3, 2013) E-mail from Frank Oldendorp and Yolanda Vandergaast (PG.New.PG29.2.1)

PG29.3 - 362 Wallace Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         The draft Zoning By-law, attached as Attachment 12 to the report (November 13, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, be amended by replacing "15,520" in Section 1(b) with "15,575", so that it now reads:

 

"b)       The residential gross floor area of the apartment building on the lot shall not exceed
15,575 square metres, and it can only be located on Blocks A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H or I as shown on Map 2;"


 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning Staff and any other appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing scheduled for January 9 and 10, 2014 with respect to 362 Wallace Avenue and support the proposal described in the report (November 13, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, including the draft Official Plan and draft Zoning By-law Amendments attached as Attachments No. 11 and 12, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning Staff and any other appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing scheduled for January 9 and 10, 2014 with respect to 362 Wallace Avenue and support the proposal described in the report (November 13, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, including the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 12, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

5.         City Council direct staff to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its final order approving the Zoning By-law until the Owner has entered into an Agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

           

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.          the owner is responsible, at its own cost, for the construction and fitting out of a 475 square metre community facility on the site to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and/or the Chief Corporate Officer, and/or the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation;

 

ii.         the owner is responsible for the design, total cost and construction of the realignment of the eastern staircase of the Wallace Street Pedestrian Bridge, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager of Transportation Services; and

 

iii.        the owner is responsible, at its own cost, for an interpretive program on site to provide information to the public on the history of the Wallace Street Pedestrian Bridge, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development, all at the owners own cost:

 

i.          the owner will provide for any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing report, as accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services should it be determined that upgrades to such infrastructure is required to support this development;

 

ii.         the owner shall comply with all parkland dedication conditions as listed in the Memorandum from the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to the City Planning Division dated October 8, 2013;

 

iii.        the owner will provide a water line connection from the site to the West Toronto Railpath generally in the location of the western terminus of Wallace Avenue which can be used by the city for a water fountain; and

 

iv.        the owner will provide a separately metered hydro connection from the site to the West Toronto Railpath generally in the location of the western terminus of Wallace Avenue.     

 

6.         City Council direct that any cash-in-lieu (CIL) of parkland dedication payment that is above the first 5%, be directed towards the cost of the construction of the community facility.

 

7.         City Council direct that a credit be provided to the owner, for the construction of the community facility, against all or part of the Parks, Forestry and Recreation component of the development charges applicable to the development.

 

8.         City Council authorize the appropriate City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

 

Origin

(November 13, 2013) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law to permit 167 residential units, and 20 light industrial units at 362 Wallace Avenue which is designated Employment Areas and zoned Industrial. Also included in the proposal is a new public road connecting Ruskin Avenue and Wallace Avenue and the western extension of McCauley Avenue. A new community facility on Ruskin Avenue is proposed, along with new connections to the West Toronto Railpath. All parking, including the required visitor parking, is proposed to be underground.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law, and directs staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing set for January 9 and 10, 2014 in support of the proposed development, subject to appropriate conditions of approval.

 

This site is also the subject of a Final Report, on the same agenda of the Planning and Growth Management Committee, which will address the Subdivision application on the site and advises that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision subject to appropriate conditions of approval.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 13, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-12 from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on 362 Wallace Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64048.pdf

Speakers

Patrick Harrington, Aird & Berlis LLP
Councillor Bailão

PG29.8 - Review of City Protocol for Telecommunications Towers Under 15 Metres in Height - Supplementary Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications PG29.8.1 to PG29.8.188 have been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the City of Toronto Telecommunications Tower Protocol by:

 

a.         Amending the first sentence in Section 3(a) titled, "Preliminary Consultation" to read:

 

"A preliminary consultation meeting between the proponent and the district

Planning Consultant and/or City Planning Staff and Toronto Building Division

staff is required for all telecommunication tower and telecommunication antenna

proposals not exempted from consultation by Industry Canada, (but including all

towers less than 15m. in height), before a Telecommunication Tower Review

Application and/or Building Permit application is submitted."

 

b.          Amending Section 9 titled, "Exemptions to Telecommunication Tower

Application Review", to read:

 

"Telecommunications antennas and towers, which are exempted from the

requirement to consult with the City under the provision of Industry Canada's

CPC-2-0-03 ("Radiocommunication and Broadcasting Antenna Systems", June

2007, effective January 1, 2008) will be exempt from a Telecommunications

Review Application. However, notwithstanding the above, telecommunications

towers less than 15 m. in height will be required to submit a Telecommunications

Tower Review Application.

 

c.         Adding a new subsection (k) to Section 4. D titled, "Design and Landscaping" to read:

 

"(k)      In addition to the above, in the location and design of new towers and antennas, proponents should have regard to the following:

 

i)           Locations directly in front of doors, windows, balconies or residential frontages should be avoided.

 

ii)         Cable trays should generally not be run up the exterior faces of

buildings.

 

iii)        Antennas that extend above the top of a supporting utility pole or light standard should appear (e.g. in colour, shape and size) to be a natural extension of the pole.

 

iv)        Individual wall-mounted antennas should be fixed as close to the wall as possible and should not project above the height of the wall face they are mounted on, in order to avoid visual clutter, and should be painted to match the wall colour for stealth.

 

v)         Parking spaces, where provided at each new Antenna System site, should have direct access to a public right-of-way at a private approach that does not unduly interfere with traffic flow or create safety hazards.

 

vi)        Cabinets shall be designed in a manner which integrates them into their surroundings, including use of decorative wraps that are graffiti resistant.

 

vii)       Cabinet dimensions shall be as minimal as possible.

 

viii)      Cables and wires must be concealed or covered.

 

ix)        Where Transport Canada and/or NAV Canada requires a structure to be lit, the lighting should be limited to the minimum number of lights and the lowest illumination allowable, and any required strobe lighting should be set to the maximum strobe interval allowed by Transport Canada.

 

x)         The lighting of equipment shelters for security purposes shall be

shielded from adjacent residential properties and kept to a minimum number of lights and a minimum illumination intensity. Lights shall only be permitted where controlled by a motion detector system.

 

 xi)       Telecommunications towers located within a public road allowance should conform to the City's "Vibrant Streets" guidelines."

 

2.         City Council direct that a sign be posted on any telecommunications tower under 15 metres in height that would inform the public that the Federal Government has granted permission for the tower and that concerns should be directed to the local Member of Parliament and/or the appropriate federal authority.

 

3.         City Council instruct the City Clerk to inform the Canadian Wireless Telecommunication Association of the changes to the City of Toronto's Telecommunications Tower Protocol and to request them to inform their members of the changes to the Protocol.

 

4.         City Council instruct the City Clerk to inform Mobilicity, Public Mobile and Wind Mobile of the changes to the City of Toronto's Telecommunications Tower Protocol.

Origin

(October 1, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This is a supplemental report to a request from the Planning and Growth Management Committee for a report on the City's Telecommunication Tower Protocol.

 

This report recommends changes to the City's Telecommunication Tower Protocol to request both public consultation and consultation with the City of Toronto for towers which are less than 15 metres in height.  Recently the Canadian Wireless Telecommunication Association came to an agreement with the Federation of Canadian Municipalities to allow for the municipal review of towers less than 15 metres in height.  This report also recommends changes to the City's Telecommunications Tower Protocol to incorporate ideas outlined in the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, "Antenna System Siting Protocol Template".

Background Information (Committee)

(October 1, 2013) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, on Review of City Protocol for Telecommunications Towers Under 15 Metres in Height - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64054.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

City of Toronto Telecommunication Tower and Antenna Protocol - Consolidated as of December 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65545.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(November 14, 2013) Letter from The Board of Directors of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (CC.Supp.PG29.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42299.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Submission from the York Mills Valley Association (CC.Supp.PG29.8.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42301.pdf
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Courtenay Lester (CC.Supp.PG29.8.3)
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Margaret Friesen (CC.Supp.PG29.8.4)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Tracey Braithwaite (CC.Supp.PG29.8.5)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Meg Sears (CC.New.PG29.8.6)
(December 13, 2013) Submission from Deborah McCutcheon (CC.New.PG29.8.7)
(December 13, 2013) Letter from David Fleming, Executive Secretary, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association and Swansea Area Ratepayers' Group (CC.New.PG29.8.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43868.pdf
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Geoff Kettel, on behalf of Brian Athey, President, Leaside Property Owners' Association (CC.New.PG29.8.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43869.pdf
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Geoff Kettel, Co-Chair, Federation of North Toronto Residents Associations (CC.New.PG29.8.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43870.pdf
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Murray Braithwaite (CC.New.PG29.8.11)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Colin Morrison (CC.New.PG29.8.12)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from James Archibald (CC.New.PG29.8.13)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Cristian Panaite (CC.New.PG29.8.14)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Joanne Haywood (CC.New.PG29.8.15)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Bernadette Engelstad (CC.New.PG29.8.16)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Myrelyn Daley (CC.New.PG29.8.17)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Brad Marsh (CC.New.PG29.8.18)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Peter Beck (CC.New.PG29.8.19)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Heather Nixon-Kemp (CC.New.PG29.8.20)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Jean Gagnon (CC.New.PG29.8.21)
(December 15, 2013) Letter from Mary C Korda (CC.New.PG29.8.22)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Carey Robertson (CC.New.PG29.8.23)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Steve Dube (CC.New.PG29.8.24)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Sharon Noble (CC.New.PG29.8.25)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Christel Martin (CC.New.PG29.8.26)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Cristian Tudorica (CC.New.PG29.8.27)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Robb Jeske (CC.New.PG29.8.28)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Steve Miller (CC.New.PG29.8.29)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Gerald Chopik (CC.New.PG29.8.30)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Joan Prater (CC.New.PG29.8.31)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Norman Murray (CC.New.PG29.8.32)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Lak Rappon (CC.New.PG29.8.33)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Ron Gordon (CC.New.PG29.8.34)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Nathalie Dube (CC.New.PG29.8.35)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Kathryn Leaver (CC.New.PG29.8.36)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Alan Lavine (CC.New.PG29.8.37)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Nancy E. Miller (CC.New.PG29.8.38)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Michael Lizotte (CC.New.PG29.8.39)
(December 15, 2013) Letter from Magda Havas, B.Sc., Ph.D., Environmental and Resource Studies Program, Trent University (CC.New.PG29.8.40)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Sweden (CC.New.PG29.8.41)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Debra Hardman (CC.New.PG29.8.42)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Devra Lee Davis, PhD MPH, Environmental Health Trust (CC.New.PG29.8.43)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Anamaria Stolea (CC.New.PG29.8.44)
(December 14, 2013) Letter from Carol Lavine, President, Glenorchy Residents' Association (CC.New.PG29.8.45)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Angela Gruenthal (CC.New.PG29.8.46)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Michael Serbinis, Chief Executive Officer, Kobo (CC.New.PG29.8.47)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Mike Belanger (CC.New.PG29.8.48)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Jackie Welland (CC.New.PG29.8.49)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Monika Niedbalski (CC.New.PG29.8.50)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Evelyne Datl (CC.New.PG29.8.51)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Yasmeen Siddiqui (CC.New.PG29.8.52)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Sharon Sadler (CC.New.PG29.8.53)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Clara Dresselhuizen (CC.New.PG29.8.54)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Richard Cote (CC.New.PG29.8.55)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Joan Yates (CC.New.PG29.8.56)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Ian Farr (CC.New.PG29.8.57)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Michael Carman and Family (CC.New.PG29.8.58)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Shirley Yanover (CC.New.PG29.8.59)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Omeed and Suri Neekon (CC.New.PG29.8.60)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Julie Fredette (CC.New.PG29.8.61)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Liz Johnston (CC.New.PG29.8.62)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Marco Zimbalatti (CC.New.PG29.8.63)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Dorothy Shostak (CC.New.PG29.8.64)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Robert Reidlinger (CC.New.PG29.8.65)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Melinda Wilde (CC.New.PG29.8.66)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Michelle DiPalma (CC.New.PG29.8.67)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Wendy Hoy (CC.New.PG29.8.68)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Bob Connolly (CC.New.PG29.8.69)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Dan Welland (CC.New.PG29.8.70)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Michael Stodola (CC.New.PG29.8.71)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Baudaux Pascal (CC.New.PG29.8.72)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Jay Crawler (CC.New.PG29.8.73)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Peter Rueschmann (CC.New.PG29.8.74)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Corina Van Sluytman (CC.New.PG29.8.75)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Chandra Sekhar (CC.New.PG29.8.76)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Roma Black (CC.New.PG29.8.77)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Kim Sartor (CC.New.PG29.8.78)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Louise Campbell (CC.New.PG29.8.79)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Denise Loft (CC.New.PG29.8.80)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Cedar Mitchell (CC.New.PG29.8.81)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Adele Hollingworth (CC.New.PG29.8.82)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Dusan Zelembaba (CC.New.PG29.8.83)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Linda Wild (CC.New.PG29.8.84)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Rick Tse (CC.New.PG29.8.85)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Jennifer Salter (CC.New.PG29.8.86)
(December 16, 2013) Fax from Mrs. Boyd (CC.New.PG29.8.87)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Tom Wilson (CC.New.PG29.8.88)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Susan Vandermeeren (CC.New.PG29.8.89)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Sue Lebrecht (CC.New.PG29.8.90)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Tal Dehtiar (CC.Main.PG29.8.91)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Melissa Chalmer (CC.New.PG29.8.92)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Michael Volansky (CC.New.PG29.8.93)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Barri Cohen (CC.New.PG29.8.94)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Melissa Chalmers (CC.New.PG29.8.95)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Melissa Chalmers (CC.New.PG29.8.96)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Susan Schellenberg (CC.New.PG29.8.97)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Anna Osterling (CC.New.PG29.8.98)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Janice Ashby (CC.New.PG29.8.99)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Anahita Belanger (CC.New.PG29.8.100)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Aurley Franklin (CC.New.PG29.8.101)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Natasha Mansouri (CC.New.PG29.8.102)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Wendy Cockburn (CC.New.PG29.8.103)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from AM Keating (CC.New.PG29.8.104)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Viorel Stolea (CC.New.PG29.8.105)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Mark Mueller (CC.New.PG29.8.106)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Jonathan Haldane (CC.New.PG29.8.107)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Jordan Johnson (CC.New.PG29.8.108)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Laura Jany (CC.New.PG29.8.109)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Monika Durlak (CC.New.PG29.8.110)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Norm Danniels (CC.New.PG29.8.111)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Leslie Gage (CC.New.PG29.8.112)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Judy Watt (CC.New.PG29.8.113)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Shelley Wright (CC.New.PG29.8.114)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Brian Durkin (CC.Main.PG29.8.115)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Tina Bolton (CC.New.PG29.8.116)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Deborah Cherry (CC.New.PG29.8.117)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Oren Scott (CC.New.PG29.8.118)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Heather Nixon and Malini Menon on behalf of Kawartha Safe Technology Initiative (CC.New.PG29.8.119)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44118.pdf
(December 15, 2013) Letter from Frank Clegg, Chief Executive Officer, Canadians for Safe Technology (C4ST) (CC.New.PG29.8.120)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44058.pdf
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Cheri Mitchell (CC.New.PG29.8.121)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Linda Ewart (CC.New.PG29.8.122)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Linda R. Floyd (CC.New.PG29.8.123)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Paulette Rende (CC.New.PG29.8.124)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Heather Finch (CC.New.PG29.8.125)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Dale Guiney (CC.New.PG29.8.126)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Bryan Fromm (CC.New.PG29.8.127)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Ana Hourahine (CC.New.PG29.8.128)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Barbara Stephen (CC.New.PG29.8.129)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Massimo Rovazzi (CC.New.PG29.8.130)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Clover Woods (CC.New.PG29.8.131)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Rob Metzingner (CC.New.PG29.8.132)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Janet Desroches (CC.New.PG29.8.133)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Ying Li (CC.New.PG29.8.134)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Steve O'Mara (CC.New.PG29.8.135)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Joanna Krop (CC.New.PG29.8.136)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Barbara Lake (CC.Main.PG29.8.137)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from E. L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.PG29.8.138)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44136.pdf
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Robert Young (CC.New.PG29.8.139)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Charlene Acres (CC.New.PG29.8.140)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Arlene Dewdney (CC.New.PG29.8.141)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, Ossington Community Association (CC.New.PG29.8.142)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44140.pdf
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Bob Eade (CC.New.PG29.8.143)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Nerissa Bogdanis (CC.New.PG29.8.144)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Abe Chan (CC.New.PG29.8.145)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Shelley Woloski (CC.New.PG29.8.146)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Katharina Gustavs (CC.New.PG29.8.147)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Rosemary Frei (CC.New.PG29.8.148)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Sarah Matthews (CC.New.PG29.8.149)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Karen King (CC.New.PG29.8.150)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Crystal Powell (CC.New.PG29.8.151)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Donna Fraser (CC.New.PG29.8.152)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Concetta Vendittelli (CC.New.PG29.8.153)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Kenny Robb (CC.New.PG29.8.154)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Michele Charest (CC.New.PG29.8.155)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Janet Berketa (CC.New.PG29.8.156)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Donna Hynes (CC.New.PG29.8.157)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from S. Brad Ledgerwood (CC.New.PG29.8.158)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Sylvia Button (CC.New.PG29.8.159)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Anthony Miller (CC.New.PG29.8.160)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Bryan Press (CC.New.PG29.8.161)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Peter Hamilton (CC.New.PG29.8.162)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Kate McLaird (CC.New.PG29.8.163)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from D. Luyks-Ledgerwood (CC.New.PG29.8.164)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Gloria Boyd (CC.New.PG29.8.165)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Robert Biancolin (CC.New.PG29.8.166)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Tammy Beck (CC.New.PG29.8.167)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Kristin Morrison and Sylvia Ponesse (CC.New.PG29.8.168)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.Main.PG29.8.169)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44167.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Jenna A.S. (CC.New.PG29.8.170)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Linda Kates (CC.New.PG29.8.171)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Marcus Schluschen (CC.New.PG29.8.172)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Ann Jones (CC.New.PG29.8.173)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Anthony Barkas (CC.New.PG29.8.174)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Erin Hill (CC.New.PG29.8.175)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Maria Faddoul (CC.New.PG29.8.176)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Kim Zagar (CC.New.PG29.8.177)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Michael Meszaros (CC.New.PG29.8.178)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Jeff Kline (CC.New.PG29.8.179)
(December 17, 2013) E-mail from Donald Janzen (CC.New.PG29.8.180)
(December 18, 2013) E-mail from Dr. Greg Haber (CC.New.PG29.8.181)
(December 17, 2013) E-mail from Virginia Farver (CC.New.PG29.8.182)
(December 18, 2013) E-mail from Marisa Dailey (CC.New.PG29.8.183)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Donna Mitchell (CC.New.PG29.8.184)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Joanne Olafson (CC.New.PG29.8.185)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Barbara Levy (CC.New.PG29.8.186)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from E. Wald (CC.New.PG29.8.187)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Chandra Sekhar (CC.New.PG29.8.188)

PG29.9 - 11 Peel Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         the draft  Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 15 to the report (November 13, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, be amended by:

 a.        Adding the following to Section 5:

           

(i)         in the event that an additional 700 square metres of non-residential gross floor area over and above the minimum required by Section 5 above is provided then the reduction of parking spaces allowed by paragraph 13(b) may increase to 65.

 

b.         Replacing Section 13(a) with the following:

 

(a)        Parking for residents shall be provided on the lot or at 20 Gladstone Avenue as follows:

 

i.          0.7 parking spaces for each bachelor dwelling unit;

ii.         0.8 parking spaces for each one bedroom dwelling unit;

iii.        0.9 parking spaces for each two bedroom dwelling unit;

iv.        1.1 parking spaces for each three bedroom dwelling unit;

 

c.         Deleting Section 13(c).

 

d.         Replacing Section 13(d) with the following:

 

(c)        A minimum of 62 parking spaces for the non-residential uses shall be provided as unreserved spaces within a commercial parking garage on the lot or at 20 Gladstone Avenue;

 

e.         Replacing Section 13(e) with the following:

 

(d)       A minimum of 0.06 parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided for visitors, on the lot or 20 Gladstone Avenue, provided that:

 

i.          A maximum of 9 of the required visitor parking spaces may be provided within a commercial parking garage; and

ii.         A minimum of 17 of the required visitor parking spaces must be dedicated for use by visitors to the residents of 11 Peel Avenue, there must be no charge for their use.

 

f.          Replacing Section 16 with the following:

 

16.       A minimum of one loading space – type “G”, three loading spaces – type “B” and two loading spaces – type “C” shall be provided and maintained on the lot.

 

(a)        Notwithstanding (16), up to one of the required loading spaces – type “B” may be provided on 20 Gladstone Avenue.

 

g.         Replacing Section 17(d) with the following:

 

(d)       despite Section 17(b) above, any one retail store, or grocery store, is only permitted to a maximum non-residential gross floor area of 2,665 square metres.

 

h.         Replacing Section 23 (b) with the following:

 

(b)        The owner, at its own cost, shall provide a cash contribution of $2.2 million to the City for the following capital facilities:

 

i)          the construction of the new public park at 405 Dufferin Street and 17-21 Peel Avenue; and

                                                           

ii)         if not all funds are used for the park construction, the remaining funds to be used towards affordable artist work studios for artists, owned and operated by the City or by a not-for-profit artspace management organization approved by the Chief Planner in consultation with the Executive Director, Toronto Culture either on or off the subject site, but within the immediate vicinity of the site, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

2.         the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 14 to the report (November 13, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning, be amended by:

 

Deleting the proposed Site and Area Specific Policy 424 in Official Plan Amendment No. 231 and replacing it with the following:

 

"424.    11 Peel Avenue

 

Residential uses are only permitted provided the following conditions of redevelopment are met:

 

a.         A minimum density of one times the area of the lot of non-residential uses must be provided as part of any redevelopment of the lot.

 

b.         A minimum density of 0.34 times the area of the lot of non-residential, non-retail uses must be provided as part of any redevelopment of the lot.

 

c.         A commercial parking garage does not count towards the non-residential or non-retail uses as described in (a) and (b) above.

 

d.         The maximum gross floor area of any one retail store on the site (including back of house activities) is 2,665 square metres.

 

e.         Publicly accessible pedestrian connections through the site to allow access from Gladstone Avenue to Dufferin Street must be provided.

 

f.          No new shadowing on properties designated as Neighbourhoods is permitted on the spring and fall equinoxes beyond the as-of-right zoning as of October 1, 2013.

 

g.         The site must provide direct pedestrian access to Queen Street West."

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning Staff and any other appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing scheduled for January 7 and 8, 2014 with respect to 11 Peel Avenue and support the proposal described in the report dated November 13, 2013 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, including the draft Official Plan Amendment and the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachments No. 14 and 15, as amended by Recommendations 1 and 2 above.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

5.         City Council direct staff to request that the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its final order on the Zoning By-law until the owner has entered into an Agreement with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

           

a.         The matters recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are:

 

"i.         $2.1 million cash contribution to be used as follows:

 

a.         the construction of the new public park at 405 Dufferin Street and 17-21 Peel Avenue; and

 

b.         if not all funds are used for the park construction, the remaining funds to be used towards affordable artist work studios for artists, owned and operated by the City or by a not-for-profit artspace management organization approved by the Chief Planner in consultation with the Executive Director, Toronto Culture either on or off the subject site, but within the immediate vicinity of the site, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

The cash contribution is to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade permit for the development, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment."

 

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement in support of the development:

 

i.          the owner shall pay for the implementation of wind mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

ii.         the owner shall pay for and provide any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing report, as accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services should it be determined that upgrades to such infrastructure are required to support this development; and

 

iii.        the owner shall lower the grade and remove all excess material, at their own cost, on the property known as 405 Dufferin Street to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation for the proposed new public park on the site.

 

6.         The applicant is required to convey 408 square metres of land, municipally known as 17-21 Peel Avenue. to the City as public parkland. The lands to be conveyed as parkland are in partial fulfillment of the 510 square metres parkland dedication requirement for the development. The 102 square metres shortfall in parkland dedication is to be provided as a cash in lieu payment and is required as a condition of the building permit application process. The parkland dedication would be subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         Prior to issuance of the first above grade building permit for the development the owner shall register a restriction on title pursuant to Section 118 of the Land Titles Act with regard to the properties municipally knows as 11 Peel Avenue and 17-21 Peel Avenue. The restriction shall be removed when the properties at 17-21 Peel Avenue are conveyed in their final base park condition to the City, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

b.         The parkland conveyance is to be free and clear, above and below grade of all physical obstructions and easements, encumbrances and encroachments, including surface and subsurface easements, unless otherwise approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation.

 

c.         Prior to transfer of the parkland to the City, the Owner shall be responsible for an environmental assessment of the soil and groundwater within the park block and any associated costs or remediation as a result of that assessment.  Such assessment and/or remediation shall ensure that the parkland at the time of conveyance to the City, meets all applicable laws, regulations and guidelines respecting sites to be used for public park purposes, including but not limited to City Council policies respecting soil remediation of sites to be acquired by the City and the Ministry of the Environment’s Guideline for Use at Contaminated Sites in Ontario, as amended.

 

The environmental assessment shall be prepared by a qualified environmental consultant acceptable to the Director Development Engineering, Technical Services in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

Prior to the conveyance of the park land to the City, the environmental assessment shall be peer reviewed by an environmental consultant retained by the City at the Owner’s expense (the ‘Peer Reviewer’), and the conveyance of the park land shall be conditional upon the Peer Reviewer concurring with the Owner’s environmental consultant that the park land meets all applicable laws, regulations and guidelines for public park purposes.

 

The applicant is required to file the Record of Site Condition (RSC) on the Ontario's Environmental Site Registry and submit the Ministry of the Environment's Letter of Acknowledgement of Filing of the Record of Site Condition (RSC) confirming that the RSC has been prepared and filed in accordance with O. Reg. 153/04, and that the MOE will not audit the RSC at this time or that the RSC has passed an MOE audit, to the Executive Director, Technical Services.

 

d.         Prior to transfer of the parkland to the City the Owner will be responsible for the base construction and installation of the parkland. The base park improvements include the following:

 

(i)         demolition, removal and disposal of all existing materials, buildings and foundations;

(ii)        grading (inclusive of topsoil supply and placement, minimum of 150 mm);

(iii)       sod (or equivalent value of other approved park development);

(iv)       fencing to City standard (where deemed necessary);

(v)        all necessary drainage systems;

(vi)       electrical and water connections to the street line (if deemed necessary), including back flow preventors, shut off valves, including

the water and hydro chambers;

(vii)      street trees along all public road allowances, which abut future City owned

parkland; and

(viii)     standard park sign (separate certified cheque required).

 

All work is to be completed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Development charge credit shall not be given for the Base Park Improvements.

 

e.         Prior to the issuance of the first above grade Building Permit the Owner shall submit a financial guarantee in the form of an irrevocable letter of credit, made payable to the Treasurer of the City of Toronto, in an amount equal to 120% of the value of the cost of the base park improvements. Such amount is to be to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

f.          The Owner shall ensure that the grading and drainage of the adjacent development blocks are compatible with the grades of the parkland to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, Technical Services.

 

g.         The Owner agrees to pay for the costs of the parkland dedication and the preparation and registration of all relevant documents. The Owner shall provide, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, all legal descriptions and applicable reference plans for the parkland dedication.

 

h.         The parkland is required to be transferred to the City within two years of issuance of the first above grade building permit for the development. Unforeseen delays (e.g. weather) resulting in the late delivery of the parkland shall be taken into consideration and at the discretion of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry & Recreation when determining a revised delivery date for the parkland.

 

i.          At the time the base park improvements have been completed, the Owner will provide certification from their landscape architect certifying all work has been completed.  At that time, the submitted letter of credit for base park improvements will be released subject to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, less 20% of the total value which will be retained for a two year period as a performance guarantee.

 

7.         City Council direct that any cash-in-lieu (CIL) of parkland dedication payment that is above the first 5%, be directed towards the cost to construct the above base park improvements of the lands to be developed as parkland.

 

8.         City Council authorize the appropriate City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Origin

(November 13, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

These applications propose to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit 434 residential units (31,103 square metres), 4,288 square metres of retail space, and 1,897 square metres of non-residential, non-retail space in a building ranging in height from 4 to 20 storeys (13.5 to 62 metres) at 11 Peel Avenue. Three hundred and fifty six parking spaces are located underground on the site. The site is currently designated Employment Areas in the Official Plan and is zoned Industrial in former City of Toronto By-law 438-86, as amended.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law and directs staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing set for January 7 and 8, 2014 in support, subject to appropriate conditions of approval.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 13, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-15 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on 11 Peel Ave - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64057.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(December 3, 2013) Letter from Steve Heuchert, on behalf of ACTIVE 18 Association (PG.New.PG29.9.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/comm/communicationfile-42060.pdf

PG29.10 - 675 Progress Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct staff to review the zoning amendment application for 675 Progress Avenue concurrently with, and in the context of the McCowan Precinct Plan Study currently being undertaken by the City Planning Division, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council direct staff to review the zoning amendment application for 675 Progress Avenue concurrently with, and in the context of the City's Five Year Review of the Official Plan which includes a Municipal Comprehensive Review that is currently underway by the City Planning Division.

 

3.         Upon a decision by City Council respecting the land use designation of the lands at 675 Progress Avenue under the Five Year Review of the Official Plan and Municipal Comprehensive Review, staff be authorized to:

 

i.          schedule a community consultation meeting for the lands at 675 Progress Avenue, together with the Ward Councillor; and

 

ii.         provide notice for a community consultation meeting to be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

 

4.         Upon the completion of the McCowan Precinct Plan Study and the reporting of the results of the Study to City Council, targeted for the First Quarter of 2014, staff be authorized to give notice for the public meeting at Scarborough Community Council under the Planning Act according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The rezoning application proposes to re-zone the northern (Phase 1) portion (approx. 2 hectares, 5 acres) of a 4.6 hectare (11.3 acre) site at 675 Progress Avenue (formerly A.G. Simpson heavy metal stamping plant) to permit mixed use development.  The owner has also filed an application to sub-divide the entire site (File No. 13 175005 ESC 38 SB).  The rezoning application on the northerly portion of the site (Phase 1) would permit 1,581 residential dwelling units, 13,300 square metres (143,165 square feet) of office use, 1,839 square metres (19,795 square feet) of retail space and a 0.23 hectare (0.57 acre) public park.  The owner intends to seek further re-zoning approval to permit Phase 2 of the development of the lands which contemplates an additional 1,592 residential dwelling units and 1,960 square metres (21,100 square feet) of retail on the southerly portion of the lands.

 

The lands are currently subject to an application, filed in 2010, to amend the Toronto Official Plan to convert the lands from employment use and to redesignate the site to “Mixed Use Areas” from "Employment Areas".  As part of this application, the owner is also seeking to change the identification of the site on the Urban Structure Map of the Official Plan from “Employment Districts” to “Centres” (to bring the lands into the Scarborough Centre).  The owner's conversion request is being considered concurrently with the City's Five Year Review of the Official Plan and the Municipal Comprehensive Review.

 

This report provides preliminary information on the above-noted rezoning application and seeks Planning and Growth Management Committee's and City Council's directions on further processing of the application and on the community consultation process.  The rezoning application should proceed through the normal planning process including the scheduling of a community consultation meeting and should also be reviewed currently with the McCowan Precinct Plan Study.  A final report on the rezoning application will be prepared and a public meeting will be targeted for the second quarter of 2014 and provided:

 

-           City Council has completed the Five Year Review of the Official Plan and the Municipal Comprehensive Review process, and has made a decision respecting the land use designation for the site;

 

-           The application is consistent with, the results of the McCowan Precinct Plan Study which is targeted to be reported in the First Quarter of 2014; and

 

-           Issues raised during the review of the development proposal have been satisfactorily resolved and all required information is provided by the owner in a timely manner.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 30, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division 675 Progress Ave Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64059.pdf

PG29.11 - Management of Excess Soil from Large Redevelopment and Construction Projects

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board; advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council reaffirm its previous request to the Ministry of the Environment to enact regulations to ensure that excess soil placement is provincially regulated in a manner that is consistent across the province and in accordance with the provisions of the Environmental Protection Act.

 

2.         City Council request that Soil Management Plans prepared by a Qualified Person for large redevelopments generating excess soil requiring off-site management be considered for the next review of the Tier 1 or Tier 2 Toronto Green Standard.

 

3.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager Cluster B to consult with affected Divisions on the feasibility and implications of a policy to require soil management plans prepared by a Qualified Person for large City-owned projects and projects undertaken by City of Toronto Agencies and Corporations generating excess soil requiring removal from the site and report back to the Executive Committee.

 

4.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager Cluster B to report back to the Executive Committee on the feasibility of creating of a "Soil Bank" similar to already existing models in the Netherlands and other jurisdictions such as Peel Region.

 

5.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager Cluster B to report in the Spring 2014 on a process to require all developers to identify the location and municipality where the soil from an excavation site will be dumped through a negotiated construction management plan.

 

6.         City Council request that the process also provide for a notification system to inform host municipalities of a developer's intent.
 

7.         City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1 of the report (November 20, 2013) from the City Solicitor.

 

8.         The recommendations contained in Attachment 1 of the report (November 20, 2013) from the City Solicitor be made public if City Council directs the requirement of Material Management Plans.  The rest of the legal advice contained in Attachment 1 of the report (November 20, 2013) from the City Solicitor should remain confidential as it pertains to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(November 7, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report responds to a request from City Council to report on mechanisms to incorporate mandatory soil management plans for large redevelopment and construction projects generating excess soil requiring off-site management. Best practices for the management of excess soil are described. The City does not have any specific authority to require soil management plans under existing legislation.

 

The report makes recommendations to ensure that excess soil is managed in a safe and consistent manner across the province and to consider including soil management plans prepared by a Qualified Person in the Tier 2 Toronto Green Standard and for City-owned projects generating excess soil requiring off-site management.

 

The City Solicitor is providing a separate confidential report on potential legal issues associated with City regulation of excess soil.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 7, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on Management of Excess Soil from Large Redevelopment and Construction Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64073.pdf

Speakers

Josh Garfinkel, EarthRoots
Carmela Marshall
David Harper, President, Canadian Brownfield Network (CBN)
Ian McLaurin, Ontario Soil Regulation Task Force
Ellen Greenwood, Ontario Environment Industry Association
Larry Corrigan, Councillor, Township of Scugog
Alan J. Durand
Councillor De Baeremaeker

Communications (Committee)

(December 4, 2013) Letter from Larry Corrigan (PG.New.PG29.11.1)
(December 3, 2013) Letter from Ellen Greenwood, Greenwood and Associates (PG.New.PG29.11.2)

11a - Management of Excess Soil from Large Redevelopment and Construction Projects - Legal Issues

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board. This report contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
(November 20, 2013) Report from City Solicitor
Summary

This report has been prepared to accompany a report prepared by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning entitled "Management of Excess Soil from Large Redevelopment and Construction Projects" dated November 7, 2013, dealing with the management of excess soil from large redevelopment and construction projects.  In discussing the issue with staff from the City Planning Division, it is apparent that the report prepared by the Chief Planner raises potential legal issues.  This report addresses those legal issues.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 20, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on Management of Excess Soil from Large Redevelopment and Construction Projects - Legal Issues
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64074.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Attachment 1 - Confidential Information (Management of Excess Soil from Large Redevelopment and Construction Projects - Legal Issues)

PG29.12 - Toronto Green Standard Review and Update: Review of Impacts of Proposed Revisions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve a change to the Light Pollution section in the updated TGS, increasing the shut-off hours from “11 p.m. and 5 a.m.” to “11 p.m. and 6 a.m.”.

 

2.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to incorporate into the criteria of a “Bird-Friendly Retro-fit Award” presented annually by the City of Toronto and Building Owners and Managers Association of Toronto: the treatment of glazing to 16 m above grade; the density of visual markers to 50mm x 50mm; and, changing the shut off hours for lights to “6 a.m.”.

 

3.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to incorporate into the City of Toronto’s “Best Practices” documents on bird-friendly glass and effective lighting: the treatment of glazing to 16 m above grade; the density of visual markers to 50mm x 50mm; and, changing shut off hours for lights to “6 a.m.”.

 

4.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consider for the next review of the Toronto Green Standard: increasing the treatment of glazing from 12m above grade to 16 m above grade; and, increasing the density of visual markers from 100mm x 100mm to 50mm x 50mm.

 

5.         In order to demonstrate leadership, City Council direct that, beginning in 2014, all new buildings built or undergoing major renovations by the City of Toronto and its Agencies and Corporations meet the bird-friendly treatment of glazing to 16 m above grade; the density of visual markers to 50 mm x 50 mm; and, changing the shut off hours for lights at 6:00 a.m.

 

6.         City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer report to the appropriate committee on the feasibility of establishing a program for auditing and retrofitting all City buildings and buildings of its Agencies and Corporations that would include treatment of glazing to 16 m above grade; the density of visual markers to 50 x 50 mm; and, changing the shut-off hours for lights to 6:00 a.m.

 

7.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to establish a standardized audit tool for existing building sites with a requirement that any future building audits be undertaken by a third party with expertise in bird collisions.

Origin

(November 6, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report responds to a request from City Council to report on the merits and feasibility of suggested changes to the Ecology section of the updated Toronto Green Standard (TGS) – Mid-to-High Rise Residential and Low Rise Non-Residential Development with respect to the “Bird Collision Deterrence” and “Light Pollution” performance measures.

 

It is recommended that the suggested change to the Light Pollution section of the TGS be adopted. With respect to the suggested changes to the Bird Collision Deterrence section, no changes to the TGS are recommended at this time. Some research into the effectiveness of these changes should be undertaken followed by consultation with stakeholders. The changes in the updated TGS reflect the consultation process which balanced the concerns of the development industry and bird protection advocates. With the exception of the change to the Light Pollution section, incorporating the changes suggested by the Council motion without further consultation would be seen as unfair to the stakeholders and participants in the TGS review.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 6, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division on Toronto Green Standard Review and Update: Review of Impacts of Proposed Revisions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64075.pdf

Speakers

Michael Mesure, FLAP Canada
Albert Koehl
Bob Alsip
Councillor De Baeremaeker

PG29.16 - Response to the Provincial Review of Land Use Planning and Appeal System

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PG29.16.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Attachment 1 of  the report (December 2, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, regarding the Response to the Provincial Review of the Land Use Planning and Appeal System, by:

 

a.         adding to Recommendation 3:

 

"The Province amend the Planning Act to restrict appeals regarding the refusal by City Council to amend a zoning by-law for a period of 5 years following its approval by Council or the zoning by-law taking effect following an appeal."

 

b.         adding to Recommendation 11:

 

"The Province amend Section 45 of the Planning Act to increase transparency in the use of the minor variance and consent process by providing clarity and defining what is minor in nature."

 

c.         deleting "of 5 years or" and replacing it with "and", in Recommendation 1.i., so that it now reads:

 

"i.         Aligning the review of the PPS and provincial plans and provide that they have consistent review timeframes and extend the timeframe to an alternative time frame of either 7 or 10 years;"

 

2.         City Council adopt Recommendations 1-19, set out in Attachment 1 of the report (December 2, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1 above;

 

3.         City Council forward the report (December 2, 2013) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing before January 10, 2014;

 

4.         City Council request the City Manager to ask Provincial Staff  to consult further with City staff in the preparation of any legislative, regulatory or other changes associated with the Review, as per the Toronto-Ontario Cooperation and Consultation Agreement;

 

5.         City Council request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to undertake a broader review of Ontario’s land-use planning system to achieve improved accountability in addition to greater coordination of provincial initiatives, collaboration and transparency in Ontario’s land use planning system;

 

6.         City Council request the Province to expand the scope of the Review to include other related matters, including the operations, practices, procedures and reporting requirements of the Ontario Municipal Board; and

 

7.         City Council request the Province to clarify and deem key policies and their implementation in municipal documents unappealable, particularly with respect to the Growth Plan and preclude the ability of entire municipal planning documents to be appealable.

Origin

(November 20, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

On October 24, 2013, the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing announced a review of the “Land Use Planning and Appeal System” (the Review) and the “Development Charges in Ontario”.  To assist in this Review the Provincial Government issued two discussion papers, which accompanied this announcement.  The purpose of the Review is to ensure that Ontario’s land use planning and appeal system is “predictable, transparent, cost-effective and responsive to the changing needs of communities.”

 

This report provides comments and recommendations for legislative change around those issues raised by the Province, which are of particular interest or concern for the City in its daily interface with the land use planning and appeal system. Comments specifically dealing with the Development Charges Act have not been included in this report.  Council has already endorsed a number of requested improvements to the legislation and implementation principles during consideration of the 2013 Development Charges By-law, the Scarborough Subway and the Metrolinx funding tools. Comments are due back to the Province by January 10, 2014.

 

The Province has made it clear that this Review does not include: consideration of the elimination of the OMB; the OMB’s operations, practices and procedures; removing or restricting the Province’s approval role and ability to intervene in planning matters; removing municipal flexibility in addressing local priorities; changing the “growth pays for growth” principle of development charges; education development charges and the development charges appeal system; creating additional fees and/or taxes; and, substantive matters involving other legislation.

 

In the case of the City of Toronto, the key pieces of legislation related to the land use planning and appeal system includes both the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Act, 2006. The Province has indicated that it will consider minor housekeeping changes to other legislation, such as the Ontario Building Code Act, for example, which has an interface with the two above noted Acts.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 2, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, Response to the Provincial Review of the Land Use Planning and Appeal System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64553.pdf
(November 20, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Response to the Provincial Review of Land Use Planning and Appeal System - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-64194.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 16, 2013) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayers Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG29.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44067.pdf

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 27

PW27.3 - Contract Award for Tender Call 209-2013 - Humber Treatment Plant Odour Control and Process Upgrades

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
The City Solicitor, the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PW27.3a with recommendations)

Communication PW27.3.1 has been submitted on this item

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and receiving of advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee submits the item to City Council without recommendation.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to report directly to City Council on the issues raised during its consideration of this matter in closed session. 

Origin

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise of the results of Tender Call 209-2013, Odour Control and Process Upgrades at the Humber Treatment Plant, in accordance with specifications as required by Engineering and Construction Services and request the authority to award a contract to WCC Construction Canada, ULC, in the amount of $51,894,000 net of HST ($52,807,334.40 net of HST recoveries).

 

This report also summarizes the material written objection received from Bondfield Construction Company Limited, the second lowest compliant bidder in relation to the award to WCC Construction Canada, ULC ("WCC"). 

Background Information (Committee)

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Contract Award for Tender Call 209-2013 - Humber Treatment Plant Odour Control and Process Upgrades
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63490.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 9, 2013) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor, the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division on Contract Award of Tender 209-2013 - Humber Treatment Plant Odour Control and Processes Upgrade (PW27.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64780.pdf
Confidential Attachment - Contract Award of Tender 209-2013 - Humber Treatment Plant Odour Control and Processes Upgrade - Comments on Legal Issues

Speakers

Ryan Breedon, Lenczner, Slaght
Olly Jasen, General Counsel, Bondfield Construction Company Ltd.
Michael O'Connell, Preconstruction and Development Manager, Walsh Canada

Communications (City Council)

(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Olly Jansen, General Counsel, Bondfield Construction Company Limited (CC.New.PW27.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43994.pdf

PW27.4 - 120-130 Harbour Street - Authority to Accept Lands Outside of the Council-Adopted Environmental Review Procedures for Lands Being Conveyed to the City

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

1.         City Council grant City staff the authority to exempt Build Toronto Inc. and Tridel from the City's Peer Review Process and from having to submit a Record of Site Condition for lands to be conveyed to the City for road purposes.

2.         City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain Council authority to exempt Build Toronto and Tridel from the Council-adopted environmental review procedures for lands to be conveyed to the City through the Planning Act process.

 

The lands are contained within the property, municipally known as 120-130 Harbour Street, where a development application has been submitted to construct a mixed-use 67 storey building.

 

The subject property was in the City’s ownership until June 2011, when it was declared surplus, and its ownership transferred to Build Toronto.  The lands are required to be conveyed to the City for future road purposes.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on 120-130 Harbour Street - Authority to Accept Lands Outside of the Council-Adopted Environmental Review Procedures for Lands Being Conveyed to the City
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63455.pdf
(November 4, 2013) Attachment 1 - 120-130 Harbour Street Conveyance Requirements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63546.pdf

PW27.5 - Sale of Decommissioned Street Name Signs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The General Manager, Transportation Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PW27.5a [ED27.16a] with recommendations)

Items ED27.16 and PW27.5 will be considered together

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1          City Council approve the use of the City's asset disposal process  to sell decommissioned street name signs, excluding oversized street name signs at a minimum bid price of $100.00 each in compliance with the Terms and Conditions listed in Appendix 1 to the report (October 25, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management.

 

2.         City Council authorize Transportation Services to annually review and adjust the minimum bid price for the purchase of a decommissioned street name sign, excluding oversized street name signs to reflect any changes in the scrap value and  changes in administration costs.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, to meet with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and report to City Council on options for artists to create public art installations with the retired street signs.

Origin

(October 25, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request City Council's approval to sell decommissioned street name signs (not including oversized street name signs) utilizing the City's asset disposal process.  Since the consolidation of street name sign design in 2007, Transportation Services has received approximately 3,500 requests to purchase decommissioned street name signs from the public. At the time of this report, there are approximately 1,200 decommissioned street name signs in stock.

 

To facilitate the sale of decommissioned street names signs, Transportation Services recommends using the City's asset disposal process which will allow the public to bid on individual decommissioned street name signs.  A minimum bid price of $30.00 will be required to purchase a sign.  The $30.00 minimum bid price is recommended and is based on the average scrap value per sign plus an estimated $15.00 administrative cost per sign.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 25, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Sale of Decommissioned Street Name Signs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63421.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 6, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Use of Decommissioned Street Signs for Artists (ED27.16a/PW27.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64905.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Paula Fletcher
Councillor Adam Vaughan

PW27.7 - Solid Waste Management Services, Collections Operations Annual Report - August 2012 to July 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that City Council receive the report (October 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, for information.

Origin

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services

Summary

The Curbside Collection contract for garbage, recycling, organic materials and other waste in District 2 was awarded to Green For Life Environmental East Corporation by City Council on October 24 and 25, 2011. Collection commenced on August 7, 2012.  The District 2 collection contract duration is for seven years with two-one year extension options that can be exercised upon City Council authorization.

 

This report serves as the annual report representing the period between August 7, 2012 to August 6, 2013, which is a more comprehensive look at the overall performance of the contractor, but also provides the ongoing quarterly updated information in the four collection districts in the City between July 1, 2013 and September 23, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, on Solid Waste Management Services, Collections Operations Annual Report - August 2012 to July 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63488.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 1 - Average Number of Daily Service Requests (Daytime Curbside Collection Complaints) Per Week
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63552.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 2 - Number of Service Requests (Daytime Curbside Collection Complaints) and Per 1,000 Pass-bys by Month
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63553.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 3 - Twelve Month Tonnages by District by Material
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63554.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 4 - Organization Chart
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63555.pdf

PW27.8 - Sewers By-law Pollution Prevention (P2) Program and Hexavalent Chromium Stakeholder Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 1728 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend §681-5-H in the draft by-law attached as Appendix A to the report (November 5, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, by adding after the words "shall submit a plan update", the words "incorporating the items set out in §681-5 C.(2)", so that the section reads as follows:

 

"H.       Every subject sector industry and every industry discharging a subject pollutant shall submit a plan update incorporating the items set out in §681-5 C.(2) for the approval of the General Manager by the end of the third year from the date which the plan was required to be submitted. Such plan update shall, in addition to the requirements otherwise set out in this article, detail and evaluate the progress of the industry to accomplish the objectives set out in its plan and the industry’s ability to accomplish those pollution prevention objectives."

 

2.         City Council amend Municipal Code Chapter 681-Sewers substantially in accordance with the draft By-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (November 5, 2013) from the General Manager, Toronto Water, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

3.         City Council direct that stakeholder consultations be conducted throughout 2014 regarding the proposed changes to the Pollution Prevention Program in relation to the:

 

a.         Creation of a subject pollutant threshold reporting list;

 

b.         Proposed changes to dental office Pollution Prevention submission requirements;

 

c.         Addition of a Best Management Practice for restaurants with the requirement to adhere to the Canadian Standard Association's B481 Standard for grease interceptor maintenance in the Sewers By-law;

 

d.         Addition of a new Best Management Practice for the automotive refinishing sector; and

 

e.         Addition of a new Best Management Practice for mobile washing business operations (including vehicle washing, graffiti removal power washing, etc).

 

4.         City Council direct staff to report back in late 2015 with suggested recommendations following its stakeholder consultations.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Toronto Water, to report to the March 4, 2014 Public Works and Infrastructure Committee meeting on a risk-based program to report the performance of all 38 subject pollutants covered by the Sewers By-law.

Origin

(November 5, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water

Summary

This report provides the summary of the successes, challenges, and proposed future direction of the Pollution Prevention ("P2") program under Municipal Code Chapter 681-Sewers (the “Sewers By-law”) as requested by City Council.

 

The report recommends amendments to the P2 Planning process and submission requirements.

 

The report also recommends inclusion of hexavalent chromium in the list of subject pollutants for P2 Planning and Reporting, and provides a summary of the stakeholder consultation in connection with that recommendation.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 5, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water, on Sewers By-law Pollution Prevention (P2) Program and Hexavalent Chromium Stakeholder Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63502.pdf
(November 5, 2013) Appendix A - Draft Amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 681 - Sewers, and Appendix B - Pollution Prevention (P2) Program Successes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63706.pdf

Speakers

Heather Marshall, DeTOx Toronto Campaigner, Toronto Environmental Alliance
Fred Granek, President, Canadian Centre for Pollution Prevention
Councillor Gord Perks

Communications (Committee)

(November 18, 2013) Letter from Fred Granek, President, Canadian Centre for Pollution Prevention (C2P2) (PW.New.PW27.8.1)
(November 20, 2013) E-mail from Karen Buck (PW.New.PW27.8.2)

PW27.9 - MTS Allstream Lease of Decommissioned Underground Pipe System - End of Term Renewal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property belonging to the City and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve entering into separate agreements with MTS Allstream for the renewal of the "Lease of City Decommissioned Underground Pipe System" and a Municipal Access Agreement to authorize the construction, installation, maintenance and operation of a telecommunications network in the City of Toronto public highways, generally on the terms and conditions as set out in this report and such other terms and conditions as may be satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council receive the report (November 4, 2013) from the City Solicitor for information.

 

3.         City Council direct that the confidential information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 4, 2013) from the City Solicitor not be released publicly as it constitutes advice which is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(November 4, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The term of a 15-year lease agreement with the telecommunications firm MTS Allstream Inc. ("Allstream") for use of a City-owned decommissioned pipe system in the City's downtown core to house its fibre optics network infrastructure expired in August 2012.  The Agreement also contains license provisions which allow the company to provide, maintain and operate its network infrastructure within the City streets beyond the pipe system.

 

City Council and the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee previously considered companion reports submitted by Transportation Services and the City Solicitor describing the telecom network, outlining how the regulatory landscape had evolved over the term of the agreement and setting out an end-of-term action plan, including various options (Item PW2.6).

 

In these reports, Council directed staff to negotiate the lease renewal and report back on the proposed terms and conditions. This report seeks Council approval to enter into an agreement with Allstream for the renewal of the pipe system lease and to enable the company to install and maintain fibre optic cables, conduit and ancillary plant in City of Toronto streets pursuant to the terms and conditions negotiated to address City interests.

Background Information (Committee)

(November 4, 2013) Report from the General Manager,Transportation Services on MTS Allstream Lease of Decommissioned Underground Pipe System - End of Term Renewal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63449.pdf

9a - Allstream Agreement - Proposed Renewal - Legal Comments

Confidential Attachment - This report involves the security of property belonging to the City and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
(November 4, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor
Summary

This report has been prepared to provide Committee and City Council with confidential information and legal advice which is relevant to the renewal of the current agreement between the City of Toronto and Allstream Inc. as recommended by the General Manager, Transportation Services in his report dated November 4, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 4, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on Allstream Agreement - Proposed Renewal - Legal Comments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63696.pdf
(November 4, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1 - Allstream Agreement - Proposed Renewal - Legal Comments

PW27.10 - Telecommunications - Authority to Permit the Installation of Stand-Alone Antenna Poles

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications PW27.10.10 to PW27.10.185 have been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council delegate to the General Manager of Transportation Services, authority to approve locations for the Poles to be installed by Rogers on the City's public right-of-way subject to the conditions listed in Recommendation 5 below.

 

2.         City Council delegate to the General Manager of Transportation Services standing authority to approve locations for any Pole within the City's public right-of-way as proposed to be installed by Other Carriers within the City's public right-of-way subject to the conditions listed in Recommendation 5 below.

 

3.         City Council adopt the "Telecommunications Antenna Placement and Design Guidelines" attached as Appendix B to the report (October 11, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

4.         City Council amend Section 1.1 in Attachment 3 to the report (October 11, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, as follows:

 

            a.         Amend bullet 8 to read "A pedestrian clearance of 2.10 metres is required."

 

            b.         Add a new bullet which reads:

 

            "The antenna pole location and associated infrastructure should not impede the ability of adjacent commercial properties to establish a boulevard or flankage patio", 

 

so that Section 1.1 now reads:

 

“The City will evaluate the location based on the following criteria with the preferred locations being:

 

           Arterial roads versus residential streets; based on the City's review poles may be located on streets where the right-of-way is 36m or greater;

           Locations adjacent to industrial areas;

           Flankage streets. If no flankage street exists, locations which will minimize impacts to view corridors; avoid view terminus and intersections;

           A preferred clearance of 20 metres from structures greater than nine metres in height;

           Locations that are not directly in front of a window, doorway, balcony or the frontage of a residence;

           Any other locations will be considered on a case-by-case basis;

           The placement of more than one antenna within a one-block radius shall not be permitted, except on a case-by-case basis;

           A pedestrian clearance of 2.10 metres is required;

           The antenna pole locations and associated infrastructure must not impede on the City's ability to plant trees in the right-of-way; and

           The antenna pole location and associated infrastructure should not impede the ability of adjacent commercial properties to establish a boulevard or flankage patio.”

 

5.         City Council direct that the following conditions apply to the authority provided to the General Manager of Transportation Services by Recommendations 1 and 2 above:

 

a.         Rogers and/or any of the Other Carriers (the "Licensees") shall enter into a licence agreement in accordance with Recommendations 6 and 7 below;

 

b.         The Licensees shall develop, in consultation with City Planning Urban Design staff and Transportation Services Public Realm staff design aesthetics for proposed pole attachments that are satisfactory to the City's Director of Urban Design and Transportation Services Director of Public Realm;

 

c.         Proposed Pole locations must comply with the "Telecommunication Antenna Placement and Design Guidelines", established by the General Manager of Transportation Services, as Appendix B to the report (October 11, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services; and

 

d.         The Licensees must pay an application fee for each location reviewed to ensure compliance with the placement criteria.

 

6.         City Council delegate to the Chief Corporate Officer (CCO) authority to negotiate, enter into and execute, on behalf of the City, a licence agreement (the "Licence"), including any amendment or extension as necessary to permit the installation of the Poles by Rogers on the City's public right-of-way, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Attachment 1 to the report (October 11, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the CCO, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

7.         City Council delegate to the Chief Corporate Officer (CCO) standing authority to negotiate, enter into and execute, on behalf of the City, the Licence as necessary to permit the installation of the Poles by any Other Carrier(s) on the City's public right-of-way, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Attachment 1 to the report (October 11, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and on such other terms and conditions as may be acceptable to the CCO, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

8.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to notify Councillors of potential antenna and cabinet equipment sites on the public right-of-way before locations are agreed upon with the carrier.

Origin

(October 11, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

Rogers Communications Inc. ("Rogers") has requested permission to install stand-alone utility poles with associated cabinets (the "Poles"), within the public right-of-way. Private pole installations of this nature are currently not permitted within the public right-of-way, however, consideration may be given, subject to strict compliance with  the proposed Telecommunication Antenna Placement and Design Criteria (Attachment 2), developed by Transportation services and any other applicable Codes and/or City Policies/Guidelines.

 

This report seeks standing delegated authority for (i) the General Manager of Transportation Services to approve locations for the proposed Poles to be installed by Rogers and any other telecommunications carriers authorized by applicable agencies to operate telecommunications systems (the "Other Carriers), subject to  certain conditions listed below; and (ii) for the Chief Corporate Officer or designate (the "CCO") to negotiate and enter into licence agreements for the Poles on the conditions set out herein.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 11, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Telecommunications - Authority to Permit the Installation of Stand-Alone Antenna Poles
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63448.pdf
(October 11, 2013) Attachment 1 - Major Terms and Conditions for Pole Licences
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63556.pdf
(October 11, 2013) Attachment 2 - Antenna Pole and Utility Cabinet Sketches
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63557.pdf
(October 11, 2013) Attachment 3 - Telecommunication Antenna Placement and Design Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63558.pdf

Speakers

Frank Clegg, Chief Executive Officer, Citizens for Safe Technology
Dan Welland, Citizens for Safe Technology
Deborah McCutcheon, Citizens for Safe Technology
Wendy Cockburn, Canadians for Safe Technology
Barb Payne
Arlene Dewdney
Anthony B. Miller, Professor Emeritus, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto
Deborah Cherry
Councillor Gord Perks

Communications (Committee)

(November 19, 2013) Submission from Margaret Friesen (PW.New.PW27.10.1)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Lorraine Penner (PW.New.PW27.10.2)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Barb Payne (PW.New.PW27.10.3)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Jane Johnston (PW.New.PW27.10.4)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Dr. Hugh Scully (PW.New.PW27.10.5)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Deborah McCutcheon (PW.New.PW27.10.6)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Barb Payne (PW.New.PW27.10.7)
(November 20, 2013) Letter from Dr. Olle Johansson, Associate Proffessor, The Experimental Dermatology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet (PW.Main.PW27.10.8)
(November 20, 2013) Submission from Arlene Dewdney (PW.New.PW27.10.9)

Communications (City Council)

(December 11, 2013) E-mail from Lucy Sanford (CC.Supp.PW27.10.10)
(December 11, 2013) E-mail from Howard M. Sandy, Executive Director, Quickstone Decorative Facings Inc. (CC.Supp.PW27.10.11)
(December 11, 2013) E-mail from Linda Wild (CC.Supp.PW27.10.12)
(December 11, 2013) E-mail from Eva Tasnady (CC.Supp.PW27.10.13)
(December 11, 2013) E-mail from Dale Hildebrand (CC.Supp.PW27.10.14)
(December 12, 2013) Letter from The Board of Directors of the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (CC.Supp.PW27.10.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42293.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Submission from the York Mills Valley Association (CC.Supp.PW27.10.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42294.pdf
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Deborah McCutcheon (CC.Supp.PW27.10.17)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Charlene Creelman (CC.Supp.PW27.10.18)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Courtenay Lester (CC.Supp.PW27.10.19)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Frank Clegg (CC.Supp.PW27.10.20)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Heather Nixon-Kemp (CC.Supp.PW27.10.21)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Tracey Braithwaite (CC.Supp.PW27.10.22)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Nataly K. (CC.Supp.PW27.10.23)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Bryan Trudel (CC.Supp.PW27.10.24)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Julie Gadsden (CC.Supp.PW27.10.25)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Peter Northrop (CC.Supp.PW27.10.26)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Devra Davis, PhD MPH, Environmental Health Trust (CC.New.PW27.10.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43977.pdf
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Magda Havas, BSc.H., Ph.D, Trent University (CC.New.PW27.10.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43978.pdf
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Craig Niziolek (CC.New.PW27.10.29)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Kristen L. Roberts (CC.New.PW27.10.30)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Dorothy Goldin Rosenberg (CC.New.PW27.10.31)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Martha Herbert, PhD, MD (CC.New.PW27.10.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44002.pdf
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Veronica Ciandre (CC.New.PW27.10.33)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Lennart Hardell, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Sweden (CC.New.PW27.10.34)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Linnette Haralampopoulos (CC.New.PW27.10.35)
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Stephen T. Sinatra, M.D., F.A.C.C., F.A.C.N., C.N.S. (CC.New.PW27.10.36)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Rick Tse (CC.New.PW27.10.37)
(December 13, 2013) Letter from David Fleming, Executive Secretary, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association/Group (CC.New.PW27.10.38)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44008.pdf
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Geoff Kettel, on behalf of Brian Athey, President, Leaside Property Owners' Association (CC.New.PW27.10.39)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44009.pdf
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Jane Johnston (CC.New.PW27.10.40)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Geoff Kettel, Co-Chair, Federation of North Toronto Residents Association (CC.New.PW27.10.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44011.pdf
(December 15, 2013) Letter from Mary C. Korda (CC.New.PW27.10.42)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Joanne Haywood (CC.New.PW27.10.43)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Brad Marsh (CC.New.PW27.10.44)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Sharon Noble (CC.New.PW27.10.45)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Prestigecars (CC.New.PW27.10.46)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Ron Gordon (CC.New.PW27.10.47)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Neil (CC.New.PW27.10.48)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Lak Rappon (CC.New.PW27.10.49)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Eric Vernon (CC.New.PW27.10.50)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Mayra Vargas (CC.New.PW27.10.51)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Alan Lavine (CC.New.PW27.10.52)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Debra Hardman (CC.New.PW27.10.53)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Vivian Meyer (CC.New.PW27.10.54)
(December 16, 2013) Submission from Glenorchy Residents' Association (CC.New.PW27.10.55)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Clara Dresselhuizen (CC.New.PW27.10.56)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Jackie S. Welland, Dr (CC.New.PW27.10.57)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Jackie Welland (CC.New.PW27.10.58)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Tamara Lennox (CC.New.PW27.10.59)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Peter Macdonald (CC.New.PW27.10.60)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Joan Yates (CC.New.PW27.10.61)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Yasmeen Siddiqui (CC.New.PW27.10.62)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Evelyne Datl (CC.New.PW27.10.63)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Maria Pracz (CC.New.PW27.10.64)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Chandra Sekhar (CC.New.PW27.10.65)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from C. Sekhar (CC.New.PW27.10.66)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Ian Farr, Exabit Consulting (CC.New.PW27.10.67)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Liz Johnston (CC.New.PW27.10.68)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Julie Fredette (CC.New.PW27.10.69)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Margo McCutcheon (CC.New.PW27.10.70)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Michelle DiPalma (CC.New.PW27.10.71)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Sandra Wash (CC.New.PW27.10.72)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Charlsie Welch (CC.New.PW27.10.73)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Tammy Beck (CC.New.PW27.10.74)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Dan Welland, Operations, C4ST (CC.New.PW27.10.75)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Marco Zimbalatti, Director of Information Technology, The Sterling Hall School (CC.New.PW27.10.76)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Brian Culbert (CC.New.PW27.10.77)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Karen and Stefano Tognarelli (CC.New.PW27.10.78)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Hetty Ngo (CC.New.PW27.10.79)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Janis Hoffmann (CC.New.PW27.10.80)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Douglas R. Craig (CC.New.PW27.10.81)
(December 16, 2013) Fax from Mrs. Boyd (CC.New.PW27.10.82)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Julita Koprianiuk (CC.New.PW27.10.83)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Laila Harris (CC.New.PW27.10.84)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Dorothy Goldin Rosenberg (CC.New.PW27.10.85)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Natasha Mansouri and Reza Isfahaninejad (CC.New.PW27.10.86)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Anahita Belanger (CC.New.PW27.10.87)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Ms. Barri Cohen (CC.New.PW27.10.88)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Dan Maher (CC.New.PW27.10.89)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Susan Schellenberg (CC.New.PW27.10.90)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from R. M. Birch (CC.New.PW27.10.91)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Jonathan Haldane (CC.New.PW27.10.92)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Aleksandra Ola (CC.New.PW27.10.93)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Jordan Morrison (CC.New.PW27.10.94)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Mark Mueller (CC.New.PW27.10.95)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Penny Barsoum (CC.New.PW27.10.96)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Kelly Keegan (CC.New.PW27.10.97)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Leslie Gage (CC.New.PW27.10.98)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Nuhija Sacirovic (CC.New.PW27.10.99)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Mrs. Rhona Slomovic (CC.New.PW27.10.100)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Mrs. Rhona Slomovic (CC.New.PW27.10.101)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Darlene Litman (CC.New.PW27.10.102)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Deborah Cherry (CC.New.PW27.10.103)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Tina Bolton (CC.New.PW27.10.104)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Shelley Wright (CC.New.PW27.10.105)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Brian Durkin (CC.New.PW27.10.106)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Zach Ruiter (CC.New.PW27.10.107)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Peter and Michelle Milne (CC.New.PW27.10.108)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Nelson Narciso (CC.New.PW27.10.109)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Carrie Lester (CC.New.PW27.10.110)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Ewa Konewka (CC.New.PW27.10.111)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from George Sanders (CC.New.PW27.10.112)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Nicole McCutcheon (CC.New.PW27.10.113)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Paulette Rende (CC.New.PW27.10.114)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Heather Finch (CC.New.PW27.10.115)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Janet Patterson (CC.New.PW27.10.116)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Bogdan Radu (CC.New.PW27.10.117)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Roberta Hague (CC.New.PW27.10.118)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Janet McNeill (CC.New.PW27.10.119)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Cara Li (CC.New.PW27.10.120)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Frank Clegg, Chief Executive Officer, Canadians for Safe Technology (C4ST) (CC.New.PW27.10.121)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44120.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Tom Wilson (CC.New.PW27.10.122)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Massimo Rovazzi (CC.New.PW27.10.123)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Massimo Rovazzi (CC.New.PW27.10.124)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Crystal Powell (CC.New.PW27.10.125)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Sephi Band and Jeff Mitz (CC.New.PW27.10.126)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Frank Lee (CC.New.PW27.10.127)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Joanna Krop (CC.New.PW27.10.128)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Ellen Frei (CC.New.PW27.10.129)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Alisa Posesorski (CC.New.PW27.10.130)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Charlene Acres (CC.New.PW27.10.131)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Lisa Fernandes (CC.New.PW27.10.132)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Rosemary Frei (CC.New.PW27.10.133)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Francesca Horbay (CC.New.PW27.10.134)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from E. L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.PW27.10.135)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44245.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Sher Smith (CC.New.PW27.10.136)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Sarah Matthews (CC.New.PW27.10.137)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Cindy Mao (CC.New.PW27.10.138)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Lorraine Penner (CC.New.PW27.10.139)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Arlene Dewdney (CC.New.PW27.10.140)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Margaret Mead (CC.New.PW27.10.141)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Josie Roussel (CC.New.PW27.10.142)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, Ossington Community Association (CC.New.PW27.10.143)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44253.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Pam Cook (CC.New.PW27.10.144)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Barbara Stephen (CC.New.PW27.10.145)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Dianne Knight (CC.New.PW27.10.146)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Dianne Knight (CC.New.PW27.10.147)
(December 16, 2013) Letter from Curtis Bennett (CC.New.PW27.10.148)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Grant McCutcheon (CC.New.PW27.10.149)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Jean Tetiuk (CC.New.PW27.10.150)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Una St. Clair, Executive Director, Citizens for Safe Technology Society (CC.New.PW27.10.151)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44262.pdf
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Tal Dehtiar (CC.New.PW27.10.152)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Evelyn Shapka (CC.New.PW27.10.153)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Lisa Thompson (CC.New.PW27.10.154)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Roberta Harris (CC.New.PW27.10.155)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Lisa Thompson (CC.New.PW27.10.156)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Kenny Robb (CC.New.PW27.10.157)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Cynthia Gibson (CC.New.PW27.10.158)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Mark Colbourne (CC.New.PW27.10.159)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Marielle Lizotte (CC.New.PW27.10.160)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Concetta (CC.New.PW27.10.161)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Joanna Demone (CC.New.PW27.10.162)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Concetta (CC.New.PW27.10.163)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Susan Matthews (CC.New.PW27.10.164)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Susan Matthews (CC.New.PW27.10.165)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Karen German (CC.New.PW27.10.166)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Karen Tognarelli (CC.New.PW27.10.167)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Mark Colbourne (CC.New.PW27.10.168)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Donna Hynes (CC.New.PW27.10.169)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Monica Jones (CC.New.PW27.10.170)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Monica Jones (CC.New.PW27.10.171)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Olaf Lappo (CC.New.PW27.10.172)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Kristin Morrison (CC.New.PW27.10.173)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Peter Hamilton (CC.New.PW27.10.174)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Holly Meyer-Dymny (CC.New.PW27.10.175)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Jerzy Dymny (CC.New.PW27.10.176)
(December 15, 2013) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PW27.10.177)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44278.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Kim Zagar (CC.New.PW27.10.178)
(December 17, 2013) E-mail from Mary Vargas and family (CC.New.PW27.10.179)
(December 17, 2013) E-mail from Sporty Athletic (CC.New.PW27.10.180)
(December 17, 2013) E-mail from Arlene Dewdney (CC.New.PW27.10.181)
(December 18, 2013) E-mail from Lisa Brecko (CC.New.PW27.10.182)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Melissa Chalmers (CC.New.PW27.10.183)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Abe Chan (CC.New.PW27.10.184)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Arlene Dewdney (CC.New.PW27.10.185)

PW27.11 - Technical Amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (October 17, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, for information.

Origin

(October 17, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards, in order to comply with the recommendations of the Auditor General's report, "Front Yard and Boulevard Parking – Improvements Needed to  Enhance Program Effectiveness" as approved by City Council at its meeting of April 10 and 11, 2012.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 17, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Technical Amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63447.pdf

PW27.12 - Congestion Management Plan 2014-2018

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications PW27.12.1 to PW.27.12.4 have been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

 1.        City Council endorse in principle the proposed five-year Congested Management Plan  to manage traffic congestion in the City of Toronto contained in Attachment 2 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Toronto Atmospheric Fund, to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on best practices taken by other comparable municipalities to manage couriers and other deliveries in high traffic areas.

Origin

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

This purpose of this report is to provide an update to the April 30, 2013 staff report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on “Traffic Congestion Management and Traffic Signal Coordination” as well as the comprehensive Congestion Management Plan.

 

The April 30, 2013 staff report provided an overview on congestion and presented near- term and long-term projects that focused primarily on traffic cameras, variable message signs, and upgrades to the Traffic Operations Centre, all with a goal of supporting active traffic management throughout the city. The report provides a more comprehensive five-year Congestion Management Plan that includes additional strategies to address congestion within the City of Toronto.

 

The goal of the five-year Congestion Management Plan is to better manage congestion and improve safety through innovation and technology that will maximize the efficiency, reliability and sustainability of the road network for all users while reducing the impacts on the environment.

 

The Plan provides a framework for a range of projects and activities that addresses a series of eight technical elements:

 

-           Intelligent Transportation Systems;         -          Curb-side Management;

-           Congestion and Engineering Studies;      -          Support of all modes of Transportation

-           Incident and Event Response;                 -          Traveller Information; and

-           Construction Coordination;                     -          Traffic Operations Centre.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Congestion Management Plan 2014-2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63457.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Attachment 1 - Managing Toronto's Congestion Today
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63631.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Attachment 2 - City of Toronto Congestion Management Plan 2014-2018
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63632.pdf

Speakers

Faye Lyons, Government and Stakeholder Relations, CAA South Central Ontario
Councillor Gord Perks
Councillor Adam Vaughan

Communications (City Council)

(December 12, 2013) E-mail from John De Marco (CC.Supp.PW27.12.1)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Terry Kelly (CC.Supp.PW27.12.2)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Andy McKenna (CC.Supp.PW27.12.3)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from James Thompson, Director at Large, Toronto Electric Riders Association (CC.New.PW27.12.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43856.pdf

PW27.13 - Downtown Transportation Operations Study - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The General Manager, Transportation Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PW27.13b with recommendations)

Bills 1804, 1809, 1810 and 1811 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse the Downtown Transportation Operations Study implementation plan outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (October 29, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, with the exception of Project 12 "Wellington Street and Simcoe Street Redesign and Two-Way Conversion".

 

2.         City Council approve the amendments to traffic and parking regulations outlined in Attachments 3 and 4 to the report (October 29, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee referred Project 12 (Wellington Street and Simcoe Street Redesign and Two-Way Conversion) identified in the report (October 29, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, together with the following motion, to the General Manager, Transportation Services, for a report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by June 30, 2014:

 

Motion by Councillor Minnan-Wong:

 

“1.       That City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to convert Simcoe Street to a two-way street from Front Street West to Queen Street West.

 

2.         That City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to convert Wellington Street to a two-way street from University Avenue to Spadina Avenue, with an appropriate approach to the Clarence Square ring road, and include in this proposal a capacity and design for potential bike lanes.”

Origin

(October 29, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is provide an update to the March 21, 2013 staff report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee “Downtown Transportation Operations Study – Interim Progress Report”, to present the study findings and recommendations for the Downtown Transportation Operations Study (DTOS), and to request City Council's endorsement of the implementation plan.

 

The DTOS is bounded by: Lake Shore Boulevard/Harbour Street, to the south; Queen Street East/West, to the north; Jarvis Street, to the east; and Bathurst Street, to the west.  However, a number of the recommended implementations can be of benefit outside the study area.

 

It is expected that by implementing the recommendations and initiating the proposed projects that traffic operations will improve and congestion will be better managed in the downtown area.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 29, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Downtown Transportation Operations Study - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63489.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 1 - Study Area Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63564.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 2 - Project Descriptions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63565.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 3 - By-laws to be Rescinded
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63626.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 4 - By-laws to be Enacted
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63627.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 5 - Proposed Project Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63628.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 6 - Costs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63629.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 13, 2013) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on the Downtown Transportation Operations Study (PW27.13b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64967.pdf
Attachment 3 - By-laws to be Rescinded
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64968.pdf
Attachment 4 - By-laws to be enacted
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64969.pdf

Speakers

Evan Weinberg, Financial District Business Improvement Area
Councillor Gord Perks
Councillor Adam Vaughan

Communications (Committee)

(November 18, 2013) Letter from Grant Humes, Executive Director, Toronto Financial District BIA (PW.New.PW27.13.1)

13a - Supplementary Report - Downtown Transportation Operations Study - Final Report

Origin
(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services
Summary

Since the submission of this report on October 29, 2013, some additional information regarding financial impacts is available and has been provided in this supplementary report.   Following further discussions with the Toronto Parking Authority and Toronto Parking Enforcement, we submit the following amended financial impact section.

Background Information (Committee)
(November 20, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Supplementary Report - Downtown Transportation Operations Study - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63958.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 1 - Study Area Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-64295.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 2 - Project Descriptions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-64296.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 3 - By-laws to be Rescinded
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-64335.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 4 - By-laws to be Enacted
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-64336.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 5 - Proposed Project Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-64297.pdf
(October 29, 2013) Attachment 6 - Costs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-64298.pdf

PW27.14 - Amendments to the Snow Emergency Provisions of City of Toronto Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bills 1773 and 1774 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to remove any reference to "snow emergencies", "an emergency condition", "emergency condition", "an emergency",  "snow emergency", and grammatical variations thereof, where appropriate,  and replace with reference to "major snow storm conditions" and grammatical variations thereof.

 

2.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to declare a "major snow storm condition" subject to the same terms and conditions that apply to the Mayor's authority, as set out in Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to extend the declaration of  a "major snow storm condition" subject to the same terms and conditions that apply to the Mayor's authority, as set out in Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

 

4.         City Council approve the amendments to the schedule of streets where parking and standing is prohibited during major snow storm conditions, as outlined in Appendix "A" to the report dated October 22, 2013 from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

5.         City Council direct the appropriate City Officials to prepare the necessary bills to make such by-law amendments as may be required to give effect to Council's decision.

Origin

(October 22, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

It is being proposed that amendments be made to the parking and standing during snow emergencies provisions in City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking.

 

This report proposes that the references in Municipal Code Chapter 950 to "snow emergencies", "an emergency condition", "emergency condition", "an emergency", "snow emergency" and variations thereof be changed to "major snow storm condition" and grammatical variations thereof.  This proposed amendment does not change the intention of the Code Chapter.  However, the change better describes the conditions.

 

Also proposed is to allow not only the Mayor but also the General Manager of Transportation Services to both declare a "major snow storm condition" and extend a "major snow storm condition".  When this condition is declared, parking and standing of vehicles on portions of specific roadways is prohibited and parking/standing on or blocking streetcar tracks on portions of specific roadways is prohibited.

 

In addition to the above-noted amendments to the wording, this report also recommends that portions of certain streets be added to the Schedule of streets where parking and standing is prohibited during major snow storm conditions and/or added to the Schedule of streets where parking/standing on or blocking streetcar tracks is prohibited during major snow storm conditions.

Background Information (Committee)

(October 22, 2013) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Amendments to the Snow Emergency Provisions of City of Toronto Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63450.pdf

PW27.15 - Confirmation of Levels of Service for Roadway and Roadside Winter Maintenance Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council reconfirm the existing levels of service for roadway de-icing, as outlined in Appendix 1 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

2.         City Council reconfirm the existing levels of service roadway snow ploughing and driveway windrow opening, as outlined in Appendix 2 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

3.         City Council confirm the amended levels of service beginning in the 2015/16 winter season for sidewalk and bus stop snow clearing, including the introduction of a higher level of service for high pedestrian volume sidewalks, at a cost of approximately $2,900,000 as outlined in Appendix 3 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

4.         City Council reconfirm the existing levels of service for snow removal as outlined in Appendix 4 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

5.         City Council request, in an effort to promote winter cycling, that the General Manager, Transportation Services, report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the creation of a network of snow routes for Toronto's bikeway that receives priority clearing and that this report recommend what changes, if any, should be made to route signage.

Origin

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to confirm the levels of service for roadway and roadside winter maintenance provided by Transportation Services, and in particular to enable the Division to tender contracts for the upcoming 2015–2022 term.

 

This report describes existing levels of service for the City’s winter operations and seeks to confirm, or adjust as directed, these levels of service for roadway de-icing, roadway ploughing, driveway windrow opening, sidewalk snow clearing and snow removal.

 

The report does not propose any adjustment to the existing levels of service for roadway de-icing and roadway ploughing, but does seek to enhance the level of service for sidewalk clearing.  The levels of service for all winter activities are illustrated in the attached appendices. 

Background Information (Committee)

(October 28, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Confirmation of Levels of Service for Roadway and Roadside Winter Maintenance Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63459.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 1 - Roadway De-icing Level of Service Table
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63634.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 2 - Roadway Ploughing Level of Service Table
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63635.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 3 - Sidewalk and Bus Stop Snow Clearing Level of Service Table
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63636.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 4 - Snow Removal Level of Service Table
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63637.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 5 - Glossary of Winter Maintenance Terms
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63638.pdf
(October 28, 2013) Appendix 6 - Toronto Winter Maintenance Survey Findings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-63639.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Dylan Reid (PW.New.PW27.15.1)
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Jared Kolb, Executive Director, Cycle Toronto (PW.New.PW27.15.2)

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 29

EY29.1 - Final Report - A Portion of the Lands Formerly Known as 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road (Block 150 on Plan 66M-2474) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West
Attention
Bill 1722 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend former City of North York  Zoning By-law No. 7625, for a portion of the lands formerly known as 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (August 21, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council requested the General Manager, Toronto Water to address the concerns raised by residents in this development regarding the discharge of surface water when reporting as part of the 2014 budget process, specifically as it relates to City Council approved Item PW25.7, headed "Impact of July 8, 2013 Storm on the City's Sewer and Stormwater Systems".

 

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on October 17, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(August 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the existing zoning regulations permitting a proposed retail shopping mall containing a grocery store on the northeast corner of the development site at 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road (Block 150 on Plan 66M-2474).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Portion of the Lands Formerly Known as 2277-2295 Sheppard Avenue West and 100 Mainshep Road (Block 150 on Plan 66M-2474) - Zoning By-law Amendment Application
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-62890.pdf

Speakers

(October 17, 2013) Tom Halinski, Aird & Berlis LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(September 4, 2013) Fax from Josie Caring (EY.Main.EY29.1.1)
(October 16, 2013) E-mail from Rajishwar Persaud (EY.Main.EY29.1.2)

EY29.2 - Final Report - 3560, 3580 and 3600 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Communications EY29.2.5 and EY28.2.6 have been submitted on this Item

Bills 1794 and 1795 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 3560, 3580 and 3600 Lake Shore Boulevard West substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (November 1, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (November 1, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with the draft Zoning By-law amended by adding the following Section 11(c):

 

             11(c)   Despite this provision, conditional permits may be issued to facilitate the construction of buildings at the discretion of the Chief Building Official.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following matters as a legal convenience to support development:

 

a.         The owner shall file applications for Site Plan Control Approval that clearly include the following at-receptor mitigation measures identified in the Environmental Noise Update, prepared by Valcoustics Canada Limited, dated May 27, 2013:

 

i.          No rooftop amenity areas on Block 11 and the mid-rise apartment building (Block B4).

 

ii.         All rooftop amenity areas on Block 10 and 14 shall be protected with a 1.5 m high acoustic barrier.

 

iii.        No sensitive receptors (bedroom, living/dining room or kitchen windows, balconies or terraces) located on the west facing facades of Blocks 10 and 11.

 

b.         The owner shall include a noise and odour warning clause indicating the proximity of the subject lands to the Wakefield Canada Inc. manufacturing and warehouse facility located at 3660 Lake Shore Boulevard West in:

 

i.          any agreement of purchase and sale and/or lease of the site;

 

ii.          any disclosure statement in respect to any sale of condominium units proposed to be developed on the site; and

 

iii.         any declaration in respect of any condominium corporation to be created for any portion of the site.

 

c.         The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009.

 

5.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to the report (November 1, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to:

 

a.         The conditions as generally listed in Attachment 10 to the report (November 1, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the Plan of Subdivision for registration; and

 

b.         Any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(November 1, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

These applications propose the comprehensive redevelopment of former industrial properties at 3560, 3580 and 3600 Lake Shore Boulevard West into a mixed use community.  The applications propose an eight storey mixed use mid-rise building and a single storey commercial building on separate parcels fronting Lake Shore Boulevard West.  The interior of the site would consist of three and four storey townhouse and stacked townhouse blocks organized around a new public street network and a public park.

 

The proposal would redevelop a brownfield site in a manner that is compatible with adjacent existing industrial uses and consistent with the objectives of Official Plan Site and Area Specific Policy 23 (SASP 23) which applies to the subject lands and the larger block between Thirty Third Street and Browns Line.  An appropriate level of intensification and mix of land uses along an identified transit corridor would be provided with a range of building types.  The proposal is also consistent with the vision of the Lake Shore Boulevard West Avenue Zoning By-law in providing appropriately massed mid-rise development and streetscaping improvements that enhance the pedestrian realm within the former Village of Long Branch.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code.  This report also advises that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision subject to the conditions presented in Attachment 10 to this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 1, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications at 3560, 3580 and 3600 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63348.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

Draft By-law attached to motion 1 by Councillor Mark Grimes, replacing Attachment 9 to the report (November 1, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-68422.pdf

Speakers

May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Kurt Franklin, Weston Consulting
Ruth Grier
Stephen Diamond, CEO. President, Diamond Corporation

Communications (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (EY.New.EY29.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41205.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Al Brezina, Executive Director, South Etobicoke Industrial Employers’ Association (EY.New.EY29.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41393.pdf
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Ryan Guetter, Vice President, Weston Consulting (EY.New.EY29.2.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41416.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP (EY.New.EY29.2.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41417.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(November 20, 2013) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, on behalf of the owners of 3660 Lake Shore Boulevard West and the lessees of 3620 Lake Shore Boulevard West (CC.Main.EY29.2.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42162.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais, on behalf of the owner of 15 Brown's Line (CC.New.EY29.2.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43857.pdf

EY29.4 - Final Report - 55 Ypres Road - Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - York South-Weston
Attention
Bill 1765 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 for the lands at 55 Ypres Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 7 the report (October 30, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to final approval and the release of the Plan of Subdivision for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bill amending former City of York Zoning By-law No. 1-83 substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (October 30, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, City Council require the owner to revise and resubmit to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report.

 

5.         City Council request the Manager, Land and Property Surveys, to investigate and report to Etobicoke York Community Council on the suitability of naming the proposed public street extending southerly from Ypres Road, between Scott Road and Kane Avenue, as "George Brownlee Court".

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

These applications propose the creation of 7 residential detached lots and 36 residential semi-detached lots, an approximately 641 m2 public park and a 16.5 m wide public street connecting to Ypres Road and terminating in a cul-de-sac on the lands at 55 Ypres Road.

 

The proposal provides an opportunity to incorporate an underutilized site into the existing residential fabric of the surrounding neighbourhood. The proposed built form and relationship to the public streets are compatible with and add to the existing housing typology in the neighbourhood. The proposal, given the severe grading challenge presented by the existing site, is appropriate for the site and the area.

 

The report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law and advises that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications - 55 Ypres Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63099.pdf

EY29.5 - Request for Direction Report - 2183 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Lifting of the Holding (H) Symbol and Site Plan Control Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Communications EY29.5.8 to EY29.5.10 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications, subject to filing the appropriate plans and materials, to be in accordance with the modifications as described in the letter by Hunter & Associates, dated November 11, 2013, and the  additional matters contained in the letter prepared by Humber Bay Shores Condominium Association, dated November 15, 2013, which shall include:

 

a.         Changing Building “A” from 66 storeys to 63 storeys, and Building “B” to 49 storeys.

 

b.         A detailed plan showing the 6 metre public walkway and its integration with the TRCA/City public park connecting from Lake Shore Boulevard to Marine Parade Drive.

 

c.         Plans showing the increased podium archway height to 11.1 metres.

 

d.         The provision of at least 268 public/commercial parking spaces which shall be shown on the P1 underground levels.

 

e.         The construction of the proposed TRCA/City park, which will be located adjacent to the site, with funds to be secured through either Section 37 and/or Cash-In-Lieu or combination thereof.

 

2.         City Council, prior to the enactment of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments, authorize appropriate City staff, in consultation with the Ward Councillor,  to secure appropriate Section 37 contributions.

           

3.         City Council direct the appropriate City staff to meet, prior to the December 16, 2013 Prehearing Conference, to settle outstanding matters in order to resolve and finalize the Official Plan and Zoning Amendment applications.

 

4.         City Council direct staff, the appropriate representatives from Humber Bay Shores Condominium Association and owners, to provide input on the design of the TRCA/City Park, as integrated with the Owner’s publicly accessible open space and walkways proposed on-site.

 

5.         City Council prior to Site Plan Approval, direct the owners of 2183 Lake Shore Boulevard West, 2175 Lake Shore Boulevard West, and 2143 & 2147 Lake Shore Boulevard West, to address any wind impacts associated with the development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

6.         City Council direct that prior to enactment of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments, the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, review and accept the findings of the AECOM study. 

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.

Origin

(November 1, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's instruction for an upcoming Ontario Municipal Board hearing which has been scheduled to commence on February 4, 2014.

 

The applicant has appealed its Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications, as well as the Site Plan Control application, to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time allotted by the Planning Act.  A pre-hearing conference was held on August 20, 2013 and a further pre-hearing conference is scheduled for December 16, 2013.  The full hearing will commence on February 4, 2014.

 

The applications before the OMB seek to permit the development of the lands, known municipally as 2183 Lake Shore Boulevard West, with two residential towers having heights of 46 and 66 storeys, rising from a six storey podium, containing a total of 1,285 residential units and 3,926 m2 of commercial uses.

 

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, as well as the Site Plan Control application.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 1, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Lifting of the Holding (H) Symbol and Site Plan Control Applications - Request for Direction Report - 2183 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63349.pdf

Speakers

Jim Reekie, President, Humber Bay Shores Condominium Association
Martin E. Gerwin
Judith A. Ruthledge
Craig Hunter, President, Hunter & Associates Ltd.
Fred Bidini

Communications (Community Council)

(November 10, 2013) E-mail from Grant Smith (EY.New.EY29.5.1)
(November 10, 2013) E-mail from Alicia Smith (EY.New.EY29.5.2)
(November 16, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodman LLP (EY.New.EY29.5.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41211.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Ruthledge, Mimico Lakeshore Network (EY.New.EY29.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41231.pdf
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Kevin Allis (EY.New.EY29.5.5)
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Jim Reekie, President, Humber Bay Shores Condominium Association (EY.New.EY29.5.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41258.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6 - Etobicoke Lakeshore (EY.New.EY29.5.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41414.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Rutledge, Co-chairs, Mimico Lake Network Steering Committee (CC.Supp.EY29.5.8)
(December 13, 2013) Letter from Brian Bailey, President, Citizens Concerned About the Future of the Etobicoke Waterfront (CC.New.EY29.5.9)
(December 16, 2013) Submission from the President, Humber Bay Shores Condominium Association, submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6 Etobicoke-Lakeshore (CC.New.EY29.5.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44054.pdf

EY29.6 - Request for Direction Report - 1990 Bloor Street West and 26 Parkview Gardens - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Second Supplemental Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Communication EY29.6.40 has been submitted on this item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council instruct the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and any other appropriate City staff to attend the OMB hearing and not to oppose the revised Zoning By-law Amendment for 1990 Bloor Street West and 26 Parkview Gardens as a basis for settlement of the appeal, provided that it is in accordance with the revised proposal received by the City on October 16, 2013, and acceptable provisions will be made for the rental replacement and tenant relocation assistance matters, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner.

 

2.         City Council instruct the City Solicitor to advise the Ontario Municipal Board of City Council's position that the redevelopment of the lands must also include the full replacement of the 24 existing rental dwelling units and a Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan, including the right of tenants to return to the new rental units in accordance with the Official Plan, and that all these matters be provided to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.  Further, that the City Solicitor request the Board to withhold any order approving a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until such time as the City and the owner have presented to the Board a draft by-law that provides for securing the rental housing matters and the owner has executed a Section 37 and/or Section 111 Agreement(s) to give effect thereto.

 

3.         City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold any order approving a Zoning By-law Amendment for the subject lands until a Natural Heritage Impact Study is completed by the applicant and a favourable peer review of the study is completed, at the sole expense of the applicant and to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning. 

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request direction for settlement of the appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) of the Zoning By-law Amendment application for the lands located at 1990 Bloor Street West and 26 Parkview Gardens.  The settlement is based on formal revisions to the proposed development received on October 16, 2013.

 

This application was the subject of a Request for Direction Report dated March 20, 2013, which referred to the original proposal, followed by a Supplemental Request for Direction Report dated April 29, 2013, related to modifications made to the original proposal.

 

On May 7, 2013, City Council adopted the recommendations of the April 29, 2013 Planning report, which included a recommendation that staff appear at the OMB hearing to oppose the application.

 

An OMB Pre-Hearing Conference was held on May 28, 2013, to establish the parties and participants for a nine day hearing scheduled to commence on December 2, 2013. 

 

Since the May 28, 2013 Pre-Hearing Conference, several meetings have been held between City staff, the proponent and area residents and their representatives.  These meetings resulted in the proponent making further changes to the proposed development, to address outstanding concerns noted in the two Request for Direction Reports.  These further revisions are illustrated in revised plans submitted to the City on October 16, 2013 as a settlement offer.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Second Supplemental Request for Direction Report - 1990 Bloor Street West and 26 Parkview Gardens
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63250.pdf

Speakers

Dianne Bradley, Chair, Bloorwest Village Residents Association
Shelly Tulloch, Goodmans
Ian Flett, Eric K. Gillespie Professional Corporation, Barristers and Solicitors

Communications (Community Council)

(November 14, 2013) E-mail from Mark Warrack (EY.New.EY29.6.1)
(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Emma Castelhano (EY.New.EY29.6.2)
(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Catherine E. Willson (EY.New.EY29.6.3)
(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Jonathan Petrie (EY.New.EY29.6.4)
(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Miriam Grenville (EY.New.EY29.6.5)
(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Caron Bery (EY.New.EY29.6.6)
(November 16, 2013) E-mail from Toby Glanville (EY.New.EY29.6.7)
(November 16, 2013) E-mail from Jackie Marrie (EY.New.EY29.6.8)
(November 16, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (EY.New.EY29.6.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41212.pdf
(November 16, 2013) E-mail from Cindy Stanleigh and David McHale (EY.New.EY29.6.10)
(November 16, 2013) E-mail from Linda Ruth Ciglen (EY.New.EY29.6.11)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Helen Williams (EY.New.EY29.6.12)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Steve McNally, BWVRA Vice-President (EY.New.EY29.6.13)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Chris Townsend (EY.New.EY29.6.14)
(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Karen Yukich (EY.New.EY29.6.15)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Alison Li (EY.New.EY29.6.16)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Barb Young (EY.New.EY29.6.17)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Ardith Ekdahl and G. Elliot Whitby (EY.New.EY29.6.18)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Krista Wylie (EY.New.EY29.6.19)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Tanya Davies (EY.New.EY29.6.20)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Michael and YJ Davidson (EY.New.EY29.6.21)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Victor and Halyna Ostapchuk (EY.New.EY29.6.22)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Ernst Hamm (EY.New.EY29.6.23)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Rishi Sharma (EY.New.EY29.6.24)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Janice Longo (EY.New.EY29.6.25)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from E L Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents’ Association (EY.New.EY29.6.26)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Barbara Yarwood (EY.New.EY29.6.27)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Leslie Gooding (EY.New.EY29.6.28)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Rhonda Ott (EY.New.EY29.6.29)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Anna MacDonald (EY.New.EY29.3.30)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Shirley and Bruce Fairley (EY.New.EY29.6.31)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Brenda Whitell (EY.New.EY29.6.32)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Katherine Cornakovic (EY.New.EY29.6.33)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Kathryn Parker (EY.New.EY29.6.34)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Tamara Berstein (EY.New.EY29.6.35)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Kerri L. Adams (EY.New.EY29.6.36)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from James Lien (EY.New.EY29.6.37)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Ann Henhoeffer and Christopher Jenkins (EY.New.EY29.6.38)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from E L Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents’ Association (EY.New.EY29.6.39)

Communications (City Council)

(December 16, 2013) E-mail from E L Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.EY29.6.40)

EY29.7 - Final Report - 50 Firwood Crescent (Lot 8, Blocks 9 and 10, Plan 66M-2508 Matthew Court) - Part Lot Control Exemption Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
Bill 1724 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 50 Firwood Crescent generally as illustrated on Attachment 1 the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

3.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required. 

Origin

(November 13, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This report reviews and recommends approval of an application for Part Lot Control Exemption for 2 semi-detached and 16 townhouse dwellings at 50 Firwood Crescent  (Lot 8, Blocks 9 and 10 on Matthew Court on Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2508).

 

The exemption from Part Lot Control would allow each lot containing semi-detached and townhouse dwelling units to be subdivided yielding 18 individual residential lots.

 

The proposal complies with the existing Official Plan and Site Specific Zoning By-law 619-2012 which applies to the lands. The lifting of Part Lot Control for a period of two years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands. This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding Part Lot Control Exemption Application at 50 Firwood Crescent (Blocks 8 to 10, Plan 66M-2508 Matthew Court)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63249.pdf

EY29.8 - City-Initiated Sherway Area Study - Supplementary Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse the preliminary terms of reference, included as Attachment 2 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, as the basis for preparing and issuing a formal terms of reference for the City-initiated Sherway Area Study.

Origin

(October 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

At its meeting of October 17, 2013 Etobicoke York Community Council approved the recommendations of a staff report dated August 23, 2013 to undertake a review and update of the existing planning policy framework for the Sherway Area.  In addition, Etobicoke York Community Council requested the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to report to the November 19, 2013 meeting of the Community Council with a preliminary terms of reference for this study.

 

This report responds to the request of Etobicoke York Community Council and provides a preliminary terms of reference for the Sherway Area Study.  This area is bounded by a CP rail corridor to the north, Highway 427 to the east, the Queen Elizabeth Way (QEW) to the south and the Etobicoke Creek to the west.

 

The Sherway Area Study provides an opportunity to revisit the existing planning policy framework enabling the City to update the Site and Area Specific Policies, Urban Design Guidelines, proposed road network and block plan, and identify any streetscape improvements or other requirements to support a complete community as envisioned by the Official Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding the City-Initiated Sherway Area Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63007.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 18, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Dentons Canada LLP (EY.New.EY29.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/comm/communicationfile-41281.pdf

EY29.20 - Traffic Control Signals - Scarlett Road and Hill Garden Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke North

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the removal of the pedestrian crossover on Scarlett Road north of Raymore Drive as this location fails the pedestrian crossover safety audit.

 

2.         City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Scarlett Road and Hill Garden Road.

Origin

(October 10, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

Although the warrants for the installation of traffic control signals are not met, a safety audit of the existing pedestrian crossover on Scarlett Road between Hill Garden Road and Raymore Drive revealed that this location is no longer environmentally suitable for a pedestrian crossover given the operating speed of vehicular traffic on Scarlett Road. Based on the results of the pedestrian crossover audit, staff is recommending that the pedestrian crossover be replaced with traffic control signals.

 

Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Scarlett Road, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC staff has been consulted on the matter and have not objected to the proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 10, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding Traffic Control Signals - Scarlett Road and Hill Garden Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63010.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63011.pdf

EY29.34 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "1B" to exclude 1830 Bloor Street West, 6-14 Oakmount Road and 7-19 Pacific Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Public Notice Given

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "1B", as attached in Appendix "A" of the report (October 29, 2013) from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services.

Origin

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to amend the boundary of Permit Parking Area 1B.

 

Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of Permit Parking Area 1B to exclude the property located at 1830 Bloor Street West, 6-14 Oakmount Road and 7-19 Pacific Avenue as requested by Etobicoke York Community Council.  We are recommending approval of the realignment as it will not impact negatively on the Permit Parking Area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, regarding the Realignment of Permit Parking Area "1B" to exclude 1830 Bloor Street West, 6-14 Oakmount Road and 7-19 Pacific Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63186.pdf
Appendix A - Area Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63187.pdf

EY29.35 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "1B" to exclude 200 Keele Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Public Notice Given

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "1B", as attached in Appendix "A" of the report (October 29, 2013) from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services.

Origin

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to amend the boundary of Permit Parking Area 1B.

 

Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of Permit Parking Area 1B to exclude the property located at 200 Keele as requested by Etobicoke York Community Council.  We are recommending approval of the realignment as it will not impact negatively on the Permit Parking Area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, regarding the Realignment of Permit Parking Area "1B" to exclude 200 Keele Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63135.pdf
Appendix A - Area Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63136.pdf

EY29.36 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "1E" to exclude 588 Annette Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Public Notice Given

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "1E", as attached in Appendix "A" of the report (October 29, 2013) from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services.

Origin

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to amend the boundary of Permit Parking Area 1E.

 

Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of Permit Parking Area 1E to exclude the property located at 588 Annette Street as requested by Etobicoke York Community Council.  We are recommending approval of the realignment as it will not impact negatively on the Permit Parking Area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, regarding the Realignment of Permit Parking Area "1E" to exclude 588 Annette Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63137.pdf
Appendix A - Area Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63138.pdf

EY29.39 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 165 & 175 Galaxy Blvd; 34 & 50 Leading Road; 70 Birmingham Street; 137 Queens Plate Drive and 120 Twenty Fourth Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke North, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 1764 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 – Fire Routes:

 

-           165 & 175 Galaxy Boulevard

-           34 & 50 Leading Road

-           70 Birmingham Street

-           137 Queens Plate Drive

-           120 Twenty Fourth Street.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and the City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Report from Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 30, 2013) Report from Toronto Fire Services regarding the Designation of Fire Routes at 165 & 175 Galaxy Blvd; 34 & 50 Leading Road; 70 Birmingham Street; 137 Queens Plate Drive and 120 Twenty Fourth Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63118.pdf
Draft By-law to amend Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to include 165 & 175 Galaxy Blvd; 34 & 50 Leading Road; 70 Birmingham Street; 137 Queens Plate Drive and 120 Twenty Fourth Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63120.pdf

EY29.42 - Additional Recommended Candidate for the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke North, 3 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 17 - Davenport

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the candidate listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 22, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning, to the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel, effective November 2013, for a term that extends to the end of the 2014-2018 Council session, or until a successor is appointed.

 

2.         City Council authorize the release of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 22, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning, once it has dealt with this staff report. 

Origin

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that the Etobicoke York Community Council nominate the individual listed in Confidential Attachment No. 1 to the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel (EYCPP) for appointment by City Council.

 

Due to a clerical error this candidate was not listed on the Confidential Attachment to the original report entitled, Recommended Candidates for the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel, from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, dated August 16, 2013 and adopted by the Etobicoke York Community Council on September 10, 2013.

 

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.EY26.40

 

The candidate successfully completed the application process.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division regarding Additional Recommended Candidate for the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-63088.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 28

NY28.13 - Northbound and Southbound Through Restrictions - Lawrence Avenue West at Corona Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bills 1779 and 1780 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the removal of the northbound 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, buses excepted, through traffic restriction at Corona Street and Lawrence Avenue West.

 

2.         City Council approve the removal of the southbound 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, buses excepted, through traffic restriction at Corona Street and Lawrence Avenue West.

 

3.         City Council approve the installation of a northbound through prohibition, buses and cyclists excepted, at the intersection of Lawrence Avenue West and Corona Street.

 

4.         City Council approve the installation of a southbound through prohibition, buses and cyclists excepted, at the intersection of Lawrence Avenue West and Corona Street.

Origin

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Lawrence Avenue West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to prohibit northbound and southbound through movements at any time at the intersection of Lawrence Avenue West and Corona Street.

 

The installation of the northbound and southbound through prohibitions at this intersection will address the concerns of the local residents with respect to the increasing traffic volumes within the neighbourhood.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Northbound and Southbound Through Restrictions at Lawrence Avenue West at Corona Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63364.pdf
Attachment - Map - Lawrence Avenue West at Corona Street - Development Site Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63236.pdf

NY28.17 - Left Turn Prohibition - 1073 and 1075 Millwood Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bills 1785 and 1786 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of an eastbound left turn prohibition on Millwood Road at a point 128 metres south of Millwood Road/Laird Drive.

 

2.         City Council approve the installation of a northbound left turn prohibition on Millwood Road at a point 128 metres south of Millwood Road/Laird Drive.

Origin

(October 23, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Millwood Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to prohibit northbound and eastbound left turns on Millwood Road at the driveway access to and from 1073/1075 Millwood Road located 128 metres south of the intersection of Millwood Road/Laird Drive. 

 

An amendment to the traffic by-law is required as part of the Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena expansion, Site Plan Application No. 11 145590 NNY 26 SA.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 23, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District on Left Turn Prohibition on 1073 and 1075 Millwood Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63371.pdf
Attachment - Map - Left Turn Prohibitions - 1073 and 1075 Millwood Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63175.pdf

NY28.22 - Request for a Report on the Procedure to Amend Use of the Dufferin Street and Allen Road HOV Lanes to include Multi-passenger Vehicles

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The motion to adopt the Item failed, therefore, this Item is submitted to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Pasternak

Summary

Currently Dufferin Street between Steeprock Drive/Overbrook Place and Finch Avenue West and William R. Allen Rd between Sheppard Avenue West and Steeprock Drive/Overbrook Place are designated as HOV lanes that are limited to Buses and Taxis but not other multi-passenger vehicles. Dufferin Street and Allen Road are heavily congested during peak hours and enabling all vehicles with multiple passengers in their vehicles would not only make more efficiently use of the HOV lane but also encourage residents to carpool further reducing the number of vehicles on the road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Pasternak on Request for a Report on the Procedure to Amend Use of the Dufferin Street and Allen Road HOV Lanes to Include Multi-passenger Vehicles
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63362.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Submission from Councillor Pasternak regarding revised recommendations for Item NY28.22 - Request for a Report on the Procedure to Amend Use of the Dufferin Street and Allen Road HOV Lanes to include Multi-passenger Vehicles (NY.New.NY28.22.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-41521.pdf

NY28.23 - Naming of a Proposed Public Street located south of George Henry Boulevard and extending easterly from Don Mills Road to Forest Manor Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
33 - Don Valley East
Attention
Communication NY28.23.3 has been submitted on this Item

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant an exemption to its Street Naming Policy and approve the name, "Helen Lu Road" to identify the proposed public street located south of George Henry Boulevard and extending easterly from Don Mills Road to Forest Manor Road.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a meeting in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and notice of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law was posted on the Public Notices Page of the City's website in accordance with the requirements of the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 162. No one addressed the North York Community Council on November 19, 2013.

 

The Committee Members present asked that the vote on the Committee Recommendations to City Council be recorded as unanimous.

Origin

(September 25, 2013) Report from the Manager, Land and Property Surveys

Summary

At its meeting on September 10, 2013, North York Community Council adopted Item NY26.57 which requested the Manager, Land and Property Surveys to report on the suitability of naming the proposed public street located south of George Henry Boulevard and extending easterly from Don Mills Road to Forest Manor Road as "Helen Lu Road".

 

The proposed name does not comply with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy. Therefore, this report recommends that the name not be approved.

 

Community Councils have delegated authority to decide street naming matters which comply with the City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 25, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Manager Land and Property Surveys on Naming of a Proposed Public Street located south of George Henry Boulevard and extending easterly from Don Mills Road to Forest Manor Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63098.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(October 15, 2013) Memo from Councillor Shelley Carroll, Ward 33 (NY.Main.NY28.23.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-40806.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Shelley Carroll (NY.New.NY28.23.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-41482.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(November 28, 2013) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Chair, North York Community Preservation Panel (CC.Main.NY28.23.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42163.pdf

NY28.24 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 35 Brian Peck Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 1772 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

 North York Community Council recommends that:

 

 1.        City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a Fire Route pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes:

 

 a.        35 Brian Peck Crescent

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(October 24, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 24, 2013) Report from the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services on Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 35 Brian Peck Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63108.pdf
Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes (Draft By-law)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63109.pdf

NY28.28 - Public Art Plan - Advent Health Care Corp. - 555 Finch Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 555 Finch Avenue West - Advent Health Care Corp. - Public Art Plan as attached to the report (October 16, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

Origin

(October 16, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 555 Finch Avenue West – Advent Health Care Corp. Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.

 

This public art plan provides a framework for commission of public art including the art location, budget, art selection process, list of invited artists, and schedule. The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 16, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division on Public Art Plan - Advent Health Care Corp. - 555 Finch Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63055.pdf
Attachment - 555 Finch Avenue West - Advent Health Corp. - Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63056.pdf

NY28.29 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 639 to 645 Lawrence Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Communications NY28.29.9 and NY28.29.10 have been submitted on this Item

Bill 1757 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 7625 of the former City of North York, for the lands at 639 - 645 Lawrence Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council direct the Director, Transportation Services, to exclude 639 - 645 Lawrence Avenue West from the permit parking inventory on Shermount Avenue and Fairholme Avenue.

 

4.         City Council direct that a traffic study be conducted by Transportation Services staff when the development at 639 - 645 Lawrence Avenue West has been completed, such study to include:

 

a.         the implementation of a four-way stop at the corner of Shermount Avenue and Fairholme Avenue; and

 

b.          review of the intersection at Shermount Avenue and Lawrence Avenue West

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

 

Councillor Josh Colle asked that his opposition to the recommendations be noted in the record.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes a four storey stacked townhouse building with 39 residential units and one level of underground parking at 639 - 645 Lawrence Avenue West. The proposed building would have a height of 14 metres and a density of 1.71 times the area of the lot.  A total of 45 parking spaces are proposed.

 

The proposal would result in a compact low-rise residential building on an arterial road in close proximity to the Lawrence West subway station, thus making efficient use of land and existing infrastructure, including public services and facilities, parks and open spaces and recreation facilities.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend Zoning By-law No. 7625 of the former City of North York.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 639-645 Lawrence Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63299.pdf

Speakers

Billy Tung, KLM Planning Partners LLP, on behalf of the applicant
Sally Marans (Submission Filed)

Communications (Community Council)

(November 1, 2013) E-mail from Steven Gold (NY.Main.NY28.29.1)
(November 13, 2013) E-mail from Isabelle Moreau (NY.New.NY28.29.2)
(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Adriana and Martin Mudron (NY.New.NY28.29.3)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Elaine Marans (NY.New.NY28.29.4)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Joe N. Nobrega, President, Wenderly Park Community Association (NY.New.NY28.29.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-41486.pdf
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from E. Marans (NY.New.NY28.29.6)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Arnold Shane (NY.New.NY28.29.7)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Sally Marans forwarding a petition with 43 names (NY.New.NY28.29.8)

Communications (City Council)

(November 22, 2013) E-mail from Chanan Kleinman (CC.Main.NY28.29.9)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Joe N. Nobrega (CC.Supp.NY28.29.10)

NY28.30 - Final Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - 238, 240, 242, 244, 250, 252, 254, 256 and 258 Finch Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Willowdale
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Toronto Water have submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY28.30a with recommendations)

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 238, 240, 242, 244, 250, 252, 254, 256 & 258 Finch Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council amend the Zoning By-law 7625 for the former City of North York substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the draft Zoning By-law being revised to reflect the following:

        

"d.       Upon creation of individual freehold lots within the Blocks as identified on Schedule RM1 (96), the following minimum lot area(s) shall apply:

 

 (i)        Blocks 1 and 4 – minimum lot area of 110 m2 per dwelling unit."

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         In accordance with the delegated approval under by-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 9 to the report (October 28, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to: 

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 9, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to obtain Notice of Approval Conditions under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, North York District.

 

6.         City Council direct City Staff to meet with the applicant and establish easement agreements, through the subdivision process, on properties where new catchbasins are being installed and to provide maintenance of the catchbasin, and that the City establish a reserve account or other method to fund the maintenance work, and the developer provide the funding, possibly in a manner similar to the funding provided for the maintenance of public art.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(October 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

These applications propose to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law to permit the redevelopment of the subject lands for a 58-unit, 4-storey residential townhouse development with 58 parking spaces accessed via a network of public streets, including a public lane. The proposal represents an assembly of 9 lots at 238, 240, 242, 244, 250, 252, 254, 256 & 258 Finch Avenue East.

 

The proposal provides for a multiple-unit residential use that will enhance the vibrancy and active nature of the Finch Avenue streetscape consistent with the objectives of the Central Finch Area Secondary Plan. The proposed development reinforces the existing and planned built form context along Finch Avenue East and the building design will contribute to and enhance the public realm. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications subject to the conditions outlined in this report.

 

This report also advises that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 28, 2013) Final Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications for 238, 240, 242, 244, 250, 252, 254, 256 & 258 Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63201.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 13, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the General Manager, Toronto Water on 238, 240, 242, 244, 250, 252, 254, 256 & 258 Finch Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications-Final Report (NY28.30a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64971.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

Speakers

Joan Slater, on behalf of residents on Winlock Park
James Whiteway

NY28.31 - Final Report - Yonge, Duplex, Helendale and Orchard View Block Planning Study

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bill 1720 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan for the lands within the area bounded by Yonge Street, Duplex Avenue, Helendale Avenue, and Orchard View Boulevard substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, NorthYork District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council adopt Urban Design Guidelines for the lands within the area bounded by Yonge Street, Duplex Avenue, Helendale Avenue and Orchard View Boulevard substantially in accordance with the draft Urban Design Guidelines attached as Attachment 6 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  No one addressed the North York Community Council on November 19, 2013.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This report recommends amendments to the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan and the adoption of Urban Design Guidelines to implement the results of the Planning Study for the block bounded by Yonge Street, Duplex Avenue, Helendale Avenue and Orchard View Boulevard. An Area Specific Policy in the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan is appropriate to provide a further layer of policy direction that reinforces and builds on the existing planning framework for the block and reflects the guiding principles arising from the Planning Study. Urban Design Guidelines that include specific guidelines for the public realm, building location and organization including servicing and access, building massing and articulation, and pedestrian amenities are also recommended.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Yonge, Duplex, Helendale and Orchard View Block Planning Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63336.pdf
Attachment 6 - Yonge, Duplex, Helendale, Orchard View Urban Design Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63337.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 18, 2013) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP, on behalf of Comare Holdings Inc. (NY.New.NY28.31.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-41490.pdf
(November 16, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, on behalf of KCAP Helendale Inc. (NY.New.NY28.31.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-41491.pdf
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from C. Ann King, Chair, Community Liaison, Stanley Knowles Housing Co-operative (NY.New.NY28.31.3)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Jack Winberg, Rockport Acquisitions Inc., submitted by Kathryn Randle, Development Planner, Rockport Group. (NY.New.NY28.31.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-41493.pdf
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Frank Peters, President, Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (ARECA) (NY.New.NY28.31.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/comm/communicationfile-41494.pdf

Declared Interests (Community Council)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor James Pasternak - as his spouse works for the Toronto Public Library

NY28.33 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application - 175 Stibbard Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse the minor variances related to 175 Stibbard Avenue (A515/13NY) and to retain outside consultants, if necessary.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Robinson

Summary

An application for minor variances related to 175 Stibbard Avenue was heard by the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment on August 28, 2013.

 

The application entailed the demolition of the existing home and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling. The applicant sought variances related to height, gross floor area and side setbacks.

 

The Committee of Adjustment refused the variance application. The applicant appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. The community has voiced significant concerns about the impact of these variances, if approved, on the neigbourhood.

Background Information (Community Council)

Memo from Councillor Robinson on Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application - 175 Stibbard Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63849.pdf
Attachment - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 175 Stibbard Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63850.pdf

NY28.34 - Bayview Avenue Design Guidelines Study

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to undertake a study for Bayview Avenue, from Highway 401 to Lawrence Avenue East, to review the appropriate development framework for the lots abutting Bayview Avenue.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Robinson

Summary

I have been working with residents and senior city planning staff to address the serious intensification and development pressure facing Bayview Avenue.

 

Two recent Ontario Municipal Board decisions at 2425 Bayview Avenue and 2500 Bayview Avenue have changed the area's planning context and require a proactive response.

 

At a public meeting in early November, a clear majority of residents voted to undertake a design guidelines study for Bayview Avenue between Lawrence Avenue East and Highway 401.

 

The purpose of the study is to develop a framework to use in evaluating applications for townhouses along this stretch of Bayview with particular attention to setbacks, landscaping, privacy and adjoining land uses, among other things.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Robinson on Bayview Avenue Design Guidelines Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63851.pdf

NY28.35 - Installation of a Second Pedestrian Crossing on Sheppard Avenue West at Senlac Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct Transportation Services staff to proceed with the installation of a pedestrian crossing on the east side of the existing intersection of Sheppard Avenue West and Senlac Road.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Filion

Summary

The existing configuration of the signalized intersection at Sheppard Avenue West and Senlac Road is comprised of a pedestrian crossing on Sheppard Avenue West located to the west of Senlac Road, and a pedestrian crossing on Senlac Road located to the north of Sheppard Avenue West.

 

A significant number of children who rely on this crossing are travelling from south of Sheppard Avenue West to either Churchill Public School or Willowdale Middle School. Both schools are located on the east side of Senlac Road. To make this journey, they are required to cross both Sheppard Avenue West and Senlac Road. Further, the upcoming opening of a new school at 1 Botham Road will bring an increase in children crossing Sheppard Avenue West from the north.

 

Parents in the community have considered this intersection unsafe for many years. Transportation Staff agree that placing a second pedestrian crossing on Sheppard Avenue West to the east of Senlac Road would be a desirable solution to these safety concerns.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Filion on Installation of a second pedestrian crossing on Sheppard Avenue West at Senlac Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63865.pdf
Attachment to the Memo from Councillor Filion on Installation of a second pedestrian crossing on Sheppard Avenue West at Senlac Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63844.pdf

NY28.36 - Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 139 Parkview Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

 North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the approval of the minor variances, and authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the Committee of Adjustment's approval of the minor variance with respect to the east side yard setback.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Filion

Summary

An application for Minor Variances was submitted by Rubinoff Design Group, on behalf of Bijan Barati, to permit the construction of a new two-storey dwelling at 139 Parkview Avenue. At its meeting of October 9th, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment granted all nine variances, including a variance for a proposed east side yard setback of 0.92 metres.

 

A side yard setback of 0.92 metres is out of character with the surrounding area and would risk setting a precedent that would change the character of the neighbourhood. Side yard setbacks of this size have not previously been allowed on newly developed two storey dwellings in this area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Filion on Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 139 Parkview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63840.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 139 Parkview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63888.pdf
Attachment 2 - A copy of Memo from Councillor Filion to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63889.pdf
Attachment 3 - Public Hearing Notice - Minor Variance Application - 139 Parkview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63890.pdf

NY28.37 - Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 29 Farrell Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.        City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the approval of the minor variances, and authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the Committee of Adjustment's approval of the minor variance with respect to the finished first floor height.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Filion

Summary

An application for Minor Variances was submitted by Homeland, on behalf of Maisam Asgarian, to permit the construction of a new two-storey dwelling at 29 Farrell Avenue. At its meeting of November 6th, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment granted all seven variances, including a variance requesting a proposed finished first floor height of 1.3 metres.

 

A finished first floor height of 1.3 metres is more than what has previously been approved in this area under zoning bylaw No. 569-2013. It would risk setting a precedent that would change the character of the neighbourhood and would begin the erosion of the zoning bylaw, which was only recently implemented.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Memo from Councillor Filion on Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 29 Farrell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63842.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application - 29 Farrell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63891.pdf
Attachment 2 - A copy of Memo from Councillor Filion to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63892.pdf
Attachment 3 - Public Hearing Notice - Minor Variance Application - 29 Farrell Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-63893.pdf

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 28

SC28.5 - 178 Bellamy Road North - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council deny the application to remove the privately owned black walnut tree at 178 Bellamy Road North.

Origin

(October 25, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report recommends that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree.  The owner has requested tree removal due to their concerns with the proximity of the tree to their driveway and that of the adjacent property to the east, as well as falling debris from the tree.

 

The subject tree is a black walnut (Juglans nigra), measuring 55 cm in diameter, located in the front yard of the property.  The tree is in good condition and, therefore, Urban Forestry cannot support removal of this tree.

 

The policies of the City of Toronto do not support removal of walnut trees due to falling fruit.  These policies have consistently been upheld by City Council.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 25, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 178 Bellamy Road North - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-62982.pdf

Speakers

Shahid Masud, Owner
Bruce Saisho

SC28.6 - 9 Ronway Crescent - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council deny the application to remove the privately owned Colorado spruce tree at 9 Ronway Crescent.

Origin

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report recommends that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree.  The owner has requested tree removal due to concerns with its location, maintenance, and that roots may be growing into the sewer line.

 

The subject tree is a Colorado spruce (Picea pungens), measuring 39 cm in diameter, located at the front of the property.  This tree is healthy; therefore, Urban Forestry cannot support removal of this tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 29, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 9 Ronway Crescent - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63016.pdf

Speakers

Maureen Lindsell, Owner

SC28.7 - 1 Moss Street - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
43 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Because motions 1 and 3 failed on tie votes, the Scarborough Community Council submits this item to City Council without recommendation.

 

Origin

(October 25, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report recommends that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree.  The owner has requested tree removal due to her concerns with its proximity to the house and related issues.

 

The subject tree is a white birch (Betula papyrifera), measuring 40 cm in diameter, located at the front of the property.  This tree is in good condition and therefore Urban Forestry cannot support removal of this tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 25, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 1 Moss Street - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63022.pdf

Speakers

April Stewart, Owner

Communications (Community Council)

(November 1, 2013) Letter from Councillor Paul Ainslie, Ward 43 - Scarborough East (SC.New.SC28.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/comm/communicationfile-41022.pdf
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from April Stewart (SC.New.SC28.7.2)

SC28.8 - Assumption of Services - 6440-6452 Kingston Road - Ballymore Developments (Kingston) Corp. - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2475

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council assume the services installed at 6440-6452 Kingston Road and that the City formally assume the roads within Plan of Subdivision 66M-2475.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the performance guarantee held with respect to this Plan of Subdivision 66M-2475.

 

3.         City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services within the Subdivision Plan 66M-2475 at 6440-6452 Kingston Road.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.

 

6.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within Plan of Subdivision 66M-2475 at 6440-6452 Kingston Road to Toronto Hydro.

Origin

(October 25, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor

Summary

This report requests Council’s authority for the City to assume the services with respect to the development at 6440-6452 Kingston Road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 25, 2013) Report and Attachment 1 from the City Solicitor - Assumption of Services - 6440-6452 Kingston Road - Ballymore Developments (Kingston) Corp. - Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2475
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63026.pdf

SC28.9 - Prohibited Turn Regulation - 1421 Kennedy Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Bills 1752 and 1753 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the prohibited turns regulation, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (September 30, 2013) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(September 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of a no left-turn prohibition for westbound left turns out of a bank driveway, approximately 74 metres south of Ellesmere Road. Traffic studies reveal that a no left-turn prohibition is justified. Prohibiting westbound left-turns at this driveway will provide a safer environment for roadway users and allow enforcement by the Toronto Police Service.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 30, 2013) Report and Appendix 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Prohibited Turn Regulations - 1421 Kennedy Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-62639.pdf
Location Plan - 1421 Kennedy Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-62640.pdf

SC28.14 - No Standing Zone - Birchmount Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
39 - Scarborough-Agincourt
Attention
Bills 1781 and 1782 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the parking regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council enact the parking regulations, as identified in Appendix 2 of the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report responds to a concern regarding vehicles parking on both sides of Birchmount Road north of Silver Springs Boulevard/L'Amoreaux Drive (near Scarborough Grace Hospital). Transportation Services staff recommends installing a No Standing Anytime regulation on both sides of Birchmount Road between Silver Springs Boulevard / L'Amoreaux Drive to McNicoll Avenue. The proposed No Standing Anytime regulation would only allow the dropping-off and picking-up of passengers along the subject section of roadway.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Report and Appendix 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - No Standing Zone - Birchmount Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63110.pdf
Location Plan - Birchmount Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63111.pdf

SC28.15 - Speed Zone Review - Brimley Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
37 - Scarborough Centre, 38 - Scarborough Centre, 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Communication SC28.15.3 has been submitted on this Item

Bills 1783 and 1784 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the 60 km/h speed limit, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council enact the 60 km/h speed limit, as identified in Appendix 2 of the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council direct Transportation Services staff to install advance warning of the reduction in speed - "50 km per hour ahead" signs on the north bound lanes.

 

4.         City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

A review of the existing speed zones along Brimley Road shows that the extension of the current 60 km/h zone north through the Highway 401 interchange would be technically desirable.   

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Report and Appendix 1-2 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Speed Zone Review - Brimley Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63132.pdf
Location Plan - Brimley Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63133.pdf

Speakers

Stephen Casselman, on behalf of the C.D. Farquharson Community Association

Communications (Community Council)

(November 16, 2013) E-mail from Marielle Stowe (SC.New.SC28.15.1)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Sheila White (SC.New.SC28.15.2)

Communications (City Council)

(December 19, 2013) E-mail from Carol Baker (CC.Main.SC28.15.3)

SC28.16 - Road Realignment - Cleadon Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
41 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council not approve the initiation of a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment for the realignment of Cleadon Road to intersect McNicoll Avenue at Bramblebrook Avenue.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report responds to a request to review the feasibility of realigning Cleadon Road to intersect McNicoll Avenue at Bramblebrook Avenue.

 

Traffic studies reveal that there is no technical need to realign Cleadon Road through the Hydro One corridor to intersect with McNicoll Avenue at Bramblebrook Avenue at this time.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Road Realignment - Cleadon Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63139.pdf
Location Plan - Cleadon Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63140.pdf

SC28.27 - 3560 St. Clair Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Bill 1756 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Kennedy Park Zoning By-law No. 9276, for the lands at 3560 St. Clair Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (October 29, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(October 29, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the construction of a four storey residential "L" shaped condominium building on a parcel of vacant land on the north side of St. Clair Avenue East, between Kennedy Road and Danforth Road.  A total of 96 residential dwelling units are proposed in a variety of one to three bedroom layouts.  The proposed height of the building is 13.6 metres (45 feet), excluding the 5 metre (16 foot) high mechanical penthouse.  Ninety-one residential and 10 visitor parking spaces are provided in an underground parking garage accessed via a two-way driveway on Kennedy Road.  Three additional visitor parking spaces are also proposed at grade, for a total of 104 parking spaces.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 29, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3560 St. Clair Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63259.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 3560 St. Clair Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63260.pdf

Speakers

Craig Hunter, Applicant, Hunter and Associates Ltd.
Ron Herczeg, Owner, St. Clair Birch Properties Inc.
Puvirajah Rajaradnam
Maulaas Elias, Translator for Puvirajah Rajaradnam

SC28.28 - 1407 Military Trail - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East
Attention
Bill 1755 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 10827, as amended, for the lands at 1407 Military Trail substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to report dated October 17, 2013.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. 

Origin

(October 17, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Highland Creek Community Zoning By-law to reduce the minimum lot frontage requirement from 21 metres (68.9 feet) to 15 metres (49.2 feet) and to establish minimum building setbacks to facilitate the severance of one existing lot at 1407 Military Trail into two new residential building lots.  The application will also facilitate the conveyance of a portion of the lands to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, which will be zoned Major Open Spaces (O).

 

The proposed amendment to the minimum lot frontage requirements is compatible with existing lot frontages on Military Trail in the immediate area, and rezoning the rear portion of the subject lands which form part of the Natural Heritage System, the Ravine By-law Protected area, and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Fill Regulated Area to a Major Open Spaces (O) Zone is appropriate for the future protection of the lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 17, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 1407 Military Trail - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-62976.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 1407 Military Trail
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-62977.pdf

Speakers

Lorelei Jones, Applicant, Macaulay Shiomi Howson Ltd.

SC28.29 - Lands on the East Side of Pidgeon Street, North of St. Clair Avenue East (Known Municipally as 0 Hymus Rd. S/S) - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Bill 1723 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands on the east side of Pidgeon Street, north of St. Clair Avenue East as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (October 11, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

3.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Origin

(October 11, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to permit exemption from part lot control for the lands located on the east side of Pidgeon Street, north of St. Clair Avenue East, to allow the division of land to create conveyable parcels for 42 townhouse dwelling units currently under construction.  This report recommends that a part lot control exemption by-law be enacted for a period of two (2) years.

 

The proposal complies with the official plan and zoning by-law. The lifting of part lot control for a period of two (2) years is considered appropriate for the orderly development of these lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of Part Lot Control Exemption.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 11, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Lands on the East Side of Pidgeon Street, North of St. Clair Avenue East (Known Municipally as 0 Hymus Rd. S/S) - Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-63481.pdf

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 28

TE28.2 - Request for Direction - 266-270 King Street West and 274-322 King Street West - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE28.2a with recommendations)

Communications TE28.2.14 to TE28.2.24 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits this item to Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to work with the applicant, and local Councillor, and bring forward directly to City Council for its meeting on December 16, 2013, any settlement terms that may result from the negotiations with respect to the Zoning Amendment Application for 266-270 King Street West and 274-322 King Street West.

Origin

(November 8, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On June 18, 2013 the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 266-270 and 274-322 King Street West to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to City Council’s failure to make a decision within the time period prescribed by the Planning Act.  A pre-hearing conference has been scheduled for January 6, 2014. 

 

The application has not been formally modified since its submission on November 9, 2012.  Much of the background and detailed information in this report is identical to the Preliminary Report considered by the Toronto and East York Community Council on February 26, 2013, which can be viewed through the item link at:

 

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.TE22.41

 

The application proposes to redevelop two separate parcels, municipally known as 266-270 King Street West (east parcel) and 274-322 King Street West (west parcel) with a mixed use development on each.

 

The East Parcel would be developed with an 82-storey mixed use building complete

with a six-storey base.  The West Parcel would be developed with two tower elements having total heights of 84 and 86 storeys from John Street to Ed Mirvish Way respectively, atop a six-storey base.

 

A total of approximately 22,220 m2 of non-residential gross floor area, 2,709 dwelling units and 311 parking spaces are proposed.

 

The development as proposed would result in the complete demolition of four (4) properties designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

This application does not represent an appropriate redevelopment of these sites and does not conform to the goals and objectives of the Official Plan.  The proposed density; tower height(s), base building height; tower floorplate ranges and tower separation distances result in a built form that is out of scale with the existing and planned context of the area.  Further, the loss of four heritage designated building, with the lack of heritage conservation also does not represent an appropriate form of redevelopment or good planning.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s direction on the appeal of these applications to the OMB.  Staff has offered to work with the applicant towards a more appropriate proposal which addresses the major issues of scale and heritage.  In the absence of any revisions, it is staff's opinion that the proposed development is inappropriate and constitutes an over-intensification of these sites.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 8, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 266-270 King Street West and 274-322 King Street West, Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63687.pdf
(November 4, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 266-270 King Street West and 274-322 King Street West, Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63412.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 17, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 266-270 King Street West, Zoning Amendment Application (TE28.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65180.pdf

Speakers

Frank Gehry, Gehry Partners, LLP
David Mirvish, President, Ed Mirvish Enterprises Ltd.
Karin Joeveer
Patrick Devine, Dentons Canada LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(November 13, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Dentons Canada LLP (TE.Supp.TE28.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-41125.pdf
(November 13, 2013) E-mail from Ahmad Atiya (TE.Supp.TE28.2.2)
(November 13, 2013) E-mail from Eric Adams (TE.Supp.TE28.2.3)
(November 13, 2013) E-mail from Jesse Audet (TE.Supp.TE28.2.4)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Kevin Allis (TE.Supp.TE28.2.5)
(November 15, 2013) Letter from David Mirvish (TE.Supp.TE28.2.6)
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Janice Solomon, Executive Director, Toronto Entertainment District BIA (TE.Supp.TE28.2.7)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from James Fraser (TE.Supp.TE28.2.8)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Brian Tavares (TE.Supp.TE28.2.9)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Tristan S (TE.Supp.TE28.2.10)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Brandon Williams (TE.Supp.TE28.2.11)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Karin Joeveer (TE.Supp.TE23.2.12)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Mary Cheng (TE.Supp.TE28.2.13)

Communications (City Council)

(December 10, 2013) Letter from Joseph L. Rotman (CC.Supp.TE28.2.14)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Tyler Greenleaf (CC.Supp.TE28.2.15)
(December 6, 2013) Letter from Lenny Lombardi, President, CHIN RADIO/TV International (CC.Supp.TE28.2.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42460.pdf
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Dentons Canada LLP, Barristers and Solicitors (CC.Supp.TE28.2.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42253.pdf
(December 9, 2013) E-mail from Simon Fodden (CC.Supp.TE28.2.18)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Noah Gurza (CC.New.TE28.2.19)
(December 15, 2013) Letter from Ceta Ramkhalawansing (CC.New.TE28.2.20)
(December 16, 2013) Letter from Catherine Nasmith, President, Toronto Architectural Conservancy (CC.New.TE28.2.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43998.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Mike Yen, Executive Director, Toronto Entertainment District Residents Association (CC.New.TE28.2.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-44070.pdf
(December 17, 2013) E-mail from Jeremy Jeong (CC.New.TE28.2.23)
(December 18, 2013) E-mail from Kevin Allis (CC.New.TE28.2.24)

TE28.3 - Demolition of Four Designated Heritage Properties - 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (TE28.3b with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information the report (October 22, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting the Demolition of Four Designated Heritage Properties - 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West.

Origin

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council refuse the proposed demolition of four designated heritage properties at 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West as part of Zoning By-law amendment application 12 276890 STE 20 OZ. 

 

The development application, which has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board for non-decision within required timeframes, proposes to redevelop two separate parcels, municipally known as 266-270 King Street West (east parcel) and 274-322 King Street West (west parcel) for the purpose of a mixed use development on each. A report from the Director, Community Planning will be considered at the November 19, 2013 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.

 

The East Parcel would be developed with an 82-storey mixed use building complete with a six storey base. The West Parcel would be developed with two tower elements having total heights of 84 and 86 storeys from John Street to Ed Mirvish Way respectively, including a six-storey base.

 

The proposed demolition of four designated buildings does not satisfy the requirements of the Planning Act, the associated Provincial Policy Statement and the City's Official Plan Heritage Policies. It also does not comply with the Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Place in Canada, which was adopted by City Council.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Demolition of Four Designated Heritage Properties - 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63006.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 6, 2013) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Demolition of Four Designated Heritage Properties - 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West (TE28.3b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64798.pdf

Speakers

Frank Gehry, Gehry Partners, LLP
David Mirvish, President, Ed Mirvish Enterprises Ltd.
Karin Joeveer
Patrick Devine, Dentons Canada LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(November 13, 2013) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Dentons Canada LLP (TE.Supp.TE28.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-41126.pdf
(November 13, 2013) E-mail from Ahmad Atiya (TE.Supp.TE28.3.2)
(November 13, 2013) E-mail from Eric Adams (TE.Supp.TE28.3.3)
(November 13, 2013) E-mail from Jesse Audet (TE.Supp.TE28.3.4)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Kevin Allis (TE.Supp.TE28.3.5)
(November 15, 2013) Letter from David Mirvish (TE.Supp.TE28.3.6)
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Janice Solomon, Executive Director, Toronto Entertainment District BIA (TE.Supp.TE28.3.7)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from James Fraser (TE.Supp.TE28.3.8)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Brian Tavares (TE.Supp.TE28.3.9)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Tristan S (TE.Supp.TE28.3.10)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Brandon Williams (TE.Supp.TE28.3.11)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Karin Joeveer (TE.Supp.TE28.3.12)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Mary Cheng (TE.Supp.TE28.3.13)

3a - Demolition of Four Designated Heritage Properties - 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West

Origin
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on November 5, 2013, considered the following:

 

1.         (October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Demolition of Four Designated Heritage Properties - 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West.

 

2.         Communications:

            (November 4, 2013) E-mail from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh (PB.Supp.PB26.12.1).

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Demolition of Four Designated heritage Properties - 266, 276, 284 and 322 King Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63694.pdf

TE28.4 - Final Report - 20-38 Gladstone Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
Bill 1721 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 20-38 Gladstone Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (October 25, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, with the following amendments to Attachment No. 8:

 

a.         Replace Section 12(a) with the following:

 

(a)        Parking for residents shall be provided on the lot or at 11 Peel Avenue as follows:

 

i.          0.7 parking spaces for each bachelor dwelling unit

ii.         0.8 parking spaces for each one bedroom dwelling unit

iii.        0.9 parking spaces for each two bedroom dwelling unit

iv.        1.1 parking spaces for each three bedroom dwelling unit

 

b.         Replace Section 12(c) with the following:

 

(c)        Parking spaces may be provided on the lot for the use of the residents of 11 Peel Avenue, and notwithstanding the definition of non-residential gross floor area these parking spaces shall not be considered as non-residential gross floor area.

 

c.         Replace Section 12(d) with the following:

 

(d)       A minimum of 0.06 parking spaces per dwelling unit shall be provided for the exclusive use of residential visitors and there shall be no charge for their use either on the lot, or at 11 Peel Avenue.

 

i.          Despite 12(d), 3 of the parking spaces required for residential visitors may be provided in a commercial parking garage either on the lot or at 11 Peel Avenue. These spaces must be dedicated to residential visitors of the lot.

 

d.         Delete Section 12(e).

 

e.         Add the following to Section 15:

 

(e)        a commercial parking garage which may only be located below grade, on the P1 parking level.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council direct that the cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication payment, that is above the first 5%, be directed towards the cost to construct the park at 405 Dufferin Street, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

4.         City Council approve the application to demolish the existing residential buildings at 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 30, 32, 34, 36 and 38 Gladstone Avenue, including the 5 residential rental dwelling units, pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363.

 

5.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue a preliminary approval of the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 for the existing residential rental housing buildings.

 

6.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation No. 5 for the existing rental housing buildings.

 

7.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for the demolition of the 10 residential buildings.  This authorization is for the lands on which the existing rental buildings are situated, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval in Recommendation No. 4 which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1E, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         the owner erect a residential building on site no later than four (4) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

b.         should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 7.a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin

(October 25, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application for a 7-storey residential condominium building at 20-38 Gladstone Avenue, and the demolition of 10 residential buildings that contain 5 existing residential rental housing units.  The proposed building contains 128 residential units and 176 below-grade vehicular parking spaces.  Parking is provided in three levels of underground parking for residents and visitors, and loading is shared with the building to the south at 8-14 Gladstone Avenue.

 

A Rental Housing Demolition application has been submitted with the rezoning application to demolish the 5 existing residential rental units located at 20, 22, 24 and 32 Gladstone Avenue.

 

This report also recommends approval under Municipal Code 667 of the rental housing demolition application with no replacement of the rental housing units.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 25, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 20-38 Gladstone Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application and Rental Housing Demolition - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63251.pdf

TE28.5 - Final Report - Ossington Avenue Between Queen Street West and Dundas Street West - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 1791 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the properties on Ossington Avenue between Queen Street West and Dundas Street West, substantially in accordance with the proposed Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report (October 31, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This is a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to create an area-specific Official Plan policy for Ossington Avenue, between Queen Street West and Dundas Street West.  The proposed policy is based on the findings and recommendations of the Ossington Avenue Planning Study that was brought forward to Toronto and East York Community Council at the meeting held on October 17, 2013. 

 

In summary, the proposed policy reinforces the existing permissions while providing more emphasis on streetscape, heritage, character of the street, and transition to adjacent residential uses.  While this report recommends a four-storey height limit for the majority of the street, it also identifies opportunity for height up to five storeys on a section of the east side of Ossington Avenue.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to create an area-specific Official Plan policy (see Attachment 4).

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Ossington Avenue Between Queen Street West and Dundas Street West - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63426.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 11, 2013) E-mail from Benj Hellie, Director of Communications, Ossington Community Association (TE.Supp.TE28.5.1)
(October 16, 2013) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP, representing 109 Ossington Ltd. (TE.Supp.TE28.5.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-41250.pdf

TE28.6 - Final Report - 595 Bay Street and 306 Yonge Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE28.6a for information)

Bill 1799 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 595 Bay Street and 306 Yonge Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report ( October 21, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.          Internalize the TTC Staircase at the northwest corner of Yonge Street and Dundas Street West to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Executive Officer of the Toronto Transit Commission.

 

ii.         Make improvements to Edward Street beyond the property line of 595 Bay Street and 306 Yonge Street substantially as shown in Attachment 1 of the report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, titled: "595 Bay Street and 306 Yonge Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report" and dated October 21, 2013.

 

iii.        The provision of a financial contribution in the amount of $350,000 for streetscape improvements on the north side of Edward Street and area, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

iv.        Improve the below-grade entrance from Dundas Station to 595 Bay Street and 306 Yonge Street to make it accessible to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Executive Officer of the Toronto Transit Commission.

 

v.         Require that the cash amounts identified in Recommendation 3.a.iii. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the Owner to the City.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the City Solicitor to report directly to Council for its meeting on December 16, 2013, providing information relating to any of the City's legal obligations under the tri-partite agreement.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council recessed its public session to meet in closed session to consider this item as it relates to the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Origin

(October 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes five-storey additions to both office towers at the Atrium on Bay known municipally as 595 Bay Street and 306 Yonge Street.  The application further proposes an addition on Bay Street covering the exterior split stair that currently occupies that space.

 

The Official Plan calls for new residential development to be balanced with increased employment opportunities within the Downtown and Central Waterfront Areas of the Official Plan.  This application represents an important opportunity to achieve the objectives of the Provincial Policy Statement, Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and the Official Plan in this regard.  The applicant is also proposing many improvements to the public realm and internalizing the TTC staircase at Yonge Street and Dundas Street West. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 21, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 595 Bay Street and 306 Yonge Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63078.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 12, 2013) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on 595 Bay Street and 306 Yonge Street Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Obligations Under Previous Development Agreements (TE28.6a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65171.pdf

Speakers

Ian J. Lord, WeirFoulds LLP
Randy Barkman
Dara O'Kane
Momar Drame
Patrick Devine, Dentons Canada LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) Letter from Ian J. Lord, WeirFoulds LLP, acting for Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation 723 (MTCC 723) (TE.Supp.TE28.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-41186.pdf
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Hondy Hung and Anthea Cheung (TE.Supp.TE28.6.2)

TE28.7 - Final Report - 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road, 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street, and 603, 605, 607, 609 and 611 Sherbourne Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Applications and Rental Housing Demolition - North St. James Town

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communications TE28.7.21 to TE28.7.34 have been submitted on this Item

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road; 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street; and 603, 605, 607, 609, and 611 Sherbourne Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (November 4, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended for the lands at 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road; 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street; and 603, 605, 607, 609, and 611 Sherbourne Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (November 4, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         City Council approve the facilities, services and matters as set out in Schedule 1 to Attachment No. 9 to the report (November 4, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and, before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to secure such facilities, services and matters, with the following amendments to Schedule 1:

 

A.        The following paragraph in Section 1 of Schedule 1 be amended to read as follows:

 

             "such amounts to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment and to be allocated at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, as follows:".

 

             B.       Section 2 of Schedule 1 be deleted and replaced with the following:

 

(2)         i)         On or before January 1, 2014 the owner shall provide a detailed Conservation Plan for the properties known as 6-16 Glen Road detailing all conservation work required in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. and dated June 8, 2011, including a detailed estimate of costs associated with the conservation work, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and shall also have commenced such conservation work by April 1, 2014 and shall complete the work on or before April 1, 2015;

 

             ii)        Before the necessary Bills are introduced to City Council for enactment permitting the increase in height and density of development proposed on Block 1, Block 2 and Block 3, the owner shall:       

 

a.         provide a detailed Conservation Plan for the properties known as 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street and 76 Howard Street, detailing all conservation work required in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. for each of the referenced properties with final revisions dated December 20, 2012 (603 Sherbourne Street), June 10, 2013 (605-607 Sherbourne Street) and June 21, 2013 (76 Howard Street), including a detailed estimate of costs associated with the conservation work, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

b.         execute a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for each of the properties at 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road and 76 Howard Street to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

c.         have completed the conservation work at 6-16 Glen Road in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan or shall provide written confirmation from the heritage architect to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, that the conservation work commenced on or before April 1, 2014 and is proceeding in accordance with the Conservation Plan in a timely and reasonable manner for completion on or before April 1, 2015.

 

C.        Section (5) ii) of Schedule 1 be deleted and replaced with the following:

 

ii)         6-16 Glen Road; prior to April 1, 2015 as required pursuant to Section (2) i) of this Schedule;".

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require that the owner provide a cash-in-lieu payment for the tree replacement requirement applicable to the significant private tree (tree 7818) being 24 new trees of 70mm calliper to be planted to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

6.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment and in connection with Blocks 1 and 3, City Council require the owner shall:

 

a.         prepare and submit to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, a detailed sanitary analysis for Block 1 and Block 3 based on current conditions and make satisfactory arrangements with the City with respect to financial contributions or sewer upgrades that may be required by the City based on the increased flow contribution by the development; and

 

b.         pay for all watermain upgrades that may be required to the satisfaction of Toronto Water in order to resolve static pressure in the area affecting Block 1 and Block 3 which is below required levels pursuant to the Fire Code as outlined in the hydrant flow test submitted by Corix Water Services, dated May 28, 2013.

 

7.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require that:

 

a.         the required variances for the replacement rental building if proposed to be located off the subject lands on the north side of Howard Street between Glen Road and Edgedale Road immediately east  of premises municipally known as 1 Glen Road, are final and binding; and

 

b.         the owner file an application for Site Plan Control with Community Planning for the replacement rental building proposed on Howard Street.

 

8.         City Council approve the application to demolish the 8 existing residential rental units located at 4 and 76 Howard Street, 603 Sherbourne Street and 16 Glen Road pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363, subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of rental housing as outlined in this report:

 

a.         the owner shall provide and maintain eight (8) residential rental dwelling units either on the subject lands or in a new building, to be located on the north side of Howard Street between Glen Road and Edgedale Road, immediately east of premises municipally known as 1 Glen Road, as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, comprising 7 one-bedroom units and 1 three-bedroom unit, all of which shall have affordable rents;

 

b.         the owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance including the right to return to a replacement rental unit for the eligible tenants to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

c.         the owner constructs the replacement rental units to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, either on the subject lands, or in a new rental apartment building located on Howard Street (as referred to in Recommendation 8.a.) substantially in accordance with the rental housing proposal dated October 28, 2013, with any revisions to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

d.         if the replacement rental units are being provided on the Howard Street location,  the owner applies for and obtains all necessary planning approvals that provide for the construction of the new replacement rental building, as provided for in Recommendation 8.c.;

 

e.         the owner shall obtain the necessary building permits for the new replacement rental building on the Howard Street location, or if the rental units are to be replaced on the subject lands, building permits for the building in which the replacement rental units are to be provided;

 

f.          the owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) on title to the lands subject to the zoning by-law and on the lands comprising the new location on Howard Street, to secure the conditions outlined in Recommendations 8.a-e. above and as described in the draft zoning by-law amendment (Attachment 9) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; and

 

g.         the owner shall enter into and register on title to the subject lands and, as applicable, to the lands comprising the new location on Howard Street, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands against which the restriction is registered, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, or his or her designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title to any part of the lands is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Section 111 Agreement; and

 

h.         for the demolition of 4 Howard Street, the owner shall obtain the necessary building permits for the development on Block 1 as provided for in the zoning by-law amendment.

 

9.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue preliminary approval for a Section 111 permit for demolition of the rental units for each of the 3 existing rental buildings at 4 and 76 Howard Street and 603 Sherbourne Street under Municipal Code Chapter 667 following satisfaction of the matters set out in Recommendation 9.a. through 9.d. below for 76 Howard Street and 603 Sherbourne Street and the matters set out in Recommendation 9.a. through 9.e. below for 4 Howard Street:

 

a.         satisfaction of the conditions in Recommendation 8;

 

b.         the Official Plan amendment and the Zoning By-law amendment for the subject lands has come into full force and effect;

 

c.         if the replacement rental units are to be located on Howard Street (as referred to in Recommendation 8.a.), the owner has obtained any necessary variances and issuance of the Notice Of Approval Conditions for site plan approval for the building by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, or his or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006;

 

d.         the owner has obtained the first building permit for the foundation of the new replacement rental building on the Howard Street lands (as referred to in Recommendation 8.a.), or if the rental units are to be replaced within the subject lands, the first building permit for shoring and excavation of the building which will contain the replacement rental units; and

 

e.         for 4 Howard Street, the issuance of the Notice Of Approval Conditions for site plan approval of Block 1 by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, or his or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

10.       City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue preliminary approval for a Section 111 permit for interior demolition of the rental units at 16 Glen Road no earlier than the issuance of the heritage permits required by the approved Conservation Plan.

 

11.       City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit for each of the 4 rental buildings under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval for each of the 4 rental buildings as appropriate, and as referred to in Recommendations 9 and 10, as appropriate.

 

12.       City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for 4 Howard Street no earlier than issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the development on Block 1, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 11, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         the owner erect a residential building on site no later than three (3) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

b.         should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition 12.a., the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

13.       City Council authorize and direct that the value of above-base improvements to the proposed public park, to be undertaken by the owner and secured through the proposed Section 37 conditions at the owner's cost, to the satisfaction of the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, be applied as a credit toward the Parks and Recreation component of the City’s development charges, such credit not to exceed the lesser of:

 

a.         the final cost of the above-base condition as confirmed by the Parks, Forestry  and Recreation staff and in an amount not exceeding $600,000; or

 

b.         the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges paid with respect to Block 3 of this development.

 

14.       City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to convene a Working Group composed of the applicant, City staff, neighbourhood representatives and the Ward Councillor to review the plans and drawings submitted for site plan approval for Blocks 1, 2 and 3, with a terms of reference prepared by City Planning staff in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

15.       City Council request that the developer and the community continue further negotiations and direct that should any further consensus between the developer and the community on the development plan emerge, or any other revisions acceptable to the Chief Planner emerge, City staff review them in consultation with the Design Review Panel and bring forward a supplementary report to outline the process for addressing any revisions, as appropriate, and before introducing the necessary bills to City Council for enactment.

 

16.       City Council direct that a committee of City staff led by Community Planning and including Parks Forestry and Recreation and Real Estate review the improvement and optimization of parks and open space in St. James Town, together with the St. James Town Community Improvement Plan and report back to Toronto and East York Community Council within 18 months.

 

17.       City Council approve the installation traffic control signals, at the applicant's expense, at the intersection of Bloor Street East and the private driveway, approximately 160 m west of Parliament Street, in conjunction with the development of Block 3.

 

18.       City Council request the Director of Transportation Services to report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council on the feasibility and possible locations for a pedestrian crossing device on Howard Street and for the applicant to provide the associated necessary funds.

 

19        City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for 76 Howard Street to facilitate the relocation of the building after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 11 of the Report  (November 4, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, which may be included in the permit allowing for the demolition of the rental unit per Chapter 667, under 363-11.1 of the Municipal Code.

 

20.       City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 37 and Section 111 Agreements.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on November 19, 2013, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act, and with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

Origin

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law proposes a development consisting of: four residential towers with heights of 12, 37, 45 and 45 storeys; 3-storey townhouses;  a low-rise mixed use base building; and retail uses at grade along Howard Street for the properties at 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road; 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street; and 603, 605, 607, 609, and 611 Sherbourne Street.  The proposal also includes: the retention of several heritage buildings (6-16 Glen Road, 603 Sherbourne Street and 605-607 Sherbourne Street); the relocation and conservation of 76 Howard Street; the conveyance of a public park; and the demolition and replacement of 8 rental dwelling units with tenant relocation assistance.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, subject to conditions.  It also recommends approval of the related application for Rental Housing Demolition.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road; 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street; and 603, 605, 607, 609 and 611 Sherbourne Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendments and Rental Housing Demolition - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63436.pdf

Speakers

Philip Day
Valerie Rodrigues
Peter Brueckner
Tom Goldspink
Rob Cadeau, Lanterra Developments Limited
Kim Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP
Kevin Moore
Lee Persolja
Margaret Coshan
Chris Hallett
Sheldon Hellin
Mary Lamon
Robert Johnston
Don Hogarth
Susannah Belton
Yvonne M. Catty, and read electronic submission from Heather Senst, SRRA
Alex Murray
David Moore (Submission Filed)
Richard S. Warner
Rosemary Graydon
Linda Brett, on behalf of self and the Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association
Dermot Sweeny, Sweeny Sterling Finlayson & Co. Architects Inc. (Submission Filed)
Mary Barratt
William Phillips
Roland Naujoks
Marlene Racine
Margaret Coshan, reading submission of Timon Shaw

Communications (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Larry Lowenstein (TE.Supp.TE28.7.1)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Richard Warner (TE.Supp.TE28.7.2)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Sheila Hill and Norma MacInnis (TE.Supp.TE28.7.3)
(November 17, 2013) Letter from Christopher and Cindy Allen (TE.Supp.TE28.7.4)
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Linda A. Brett (TE.Supp.TE28.7.5)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Brian and Susan Magee (TE.Supp.TE28.7.6)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Linda A. Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association (TE.Supp.TE28.7.7)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Catherine Temelcoff (TE.Supp.TE28.7.8)
(November 18, 2013) Submission from Paula Vopni (TE.Supp.TE28.7.9)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Vickie Rennie (TE.Supp.TE28.7.10)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Ruth Hall, SRRA Member (TE.Supp.TE28.7.11)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Diane Parsons (TE.Supp.TE28.7.12)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Timon Shaw (TE.Supp.TE28.7.13)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Caroline Kaiser (TE.Supp.TE28.7.14)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Don Hogarth (TE.Supp.TE28.7.15)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Valerie Rodrigues (TE.Supp.TE28.7.16)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Dermot Sweeny (TE.Supp.TE28.7.17)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from David Moore (TE.Supp.TE28.7.18)
(July 17, 2012) E-mail from Alex Rafuse (TE.Supp.TE28.7.19)
(October 16, 2013) Petition from approximately 53 individuals in opposition to the application. (TE.Supp.TE28.7.20)

Communications (City Council)

(November 22, 2013) Submission from Chris Hallett (CC.Main.TE28.7.21)
(November 22, 2013) Submission from Margaret Coshan (CC.Main.TE28.7.22)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Norma J. MacInnis (CC.Supp.TE28.7.23)
(December 12, 2013) Letter from Chris Hallett (CC.Supp.TE28.7.24)
(December 12, 2013) E-mail from Sheila Hill (CC.Supp.TE28.7.25)
(December 13, 2013) E-mail from Philip Day (CC.New.TE28.7.26)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Lee Persolja (CC.New.TE28.7.27)
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Glenn Speiran (CC.New.TE28.7.28)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Tom Goldspink (CC.New.TE28.7.29)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Timon Shaw (CC.New.TE28.7.30)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Avram Paul (CC.New.TE28.7.31)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Robert Mathe (CC.New.TE28.7.32)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Frank Robbins (CC.New.TE28.7.33)
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from David Townley, President, South Rosedale Residents' Association submitted by David Moore, Director, South Rosedale Residents' Association (CC.New.TE28.7.34)

TE28.8 - Alterations to Heritage Property; Demolition of Heritage Property; Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act; Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road, 4 Howard Street, 76 Howard Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communications TE28.8.19 to TE28.8.22 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the proposed alterations to the heritage properties at 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road and 76 Howard Street substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Architects Alliance dated July 5, 2013, date stamped received by the City Planning Division July 15, 2013, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and the Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) prepared by ERA Architects Inc. for each of the above-noted properties with final revisions dated: 603 Sherbourne Street (December 20, 2012); 605-607 Sherbourne Street (June 10, 2013); 6-16 Glen Road (June 8, 2011); and 76 Howard Street (June 21, 2013), all on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         On or before January 1, 2014 the owner shall provide a detailed Conservation Plan for the properties known as 6-16 Glen Road detailing all conservation work required in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment referenced in this Recommendation 1, including a detailed estimate of costs associated with the conservation work, to be prepared by a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and shall also have commenced such conservation work by April 1, 2014 and shall complete the work on or before April 1, 2015;

 

b.         Prior to the introduction of Bills in Council for the Official Plan Amendment or Zoning By-law Amendment, the owner shall:

 

i.          provide a detailed Conservation Plan for the properties known as 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street and 76 Howard Street, detailing all conservation work required in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessments referenced in this Recommendation 1, including a detailed estimate of costs associated with the conservation work, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;

 

ii.         execute a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for each of the properties at 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road and 76 Howard Street to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and

 

iii.        have completed the conservation work at 6-16 Glen Road in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan or shall provide written confirmation from the heritage architect to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, that the conservation work commenced on or before April 1, 2014 and is proceeding in accordance with the Conservation Plan in a timely and reasonable manner for completion on or before April 1, 2015.

 

c.         That prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the properties referenced in Recommendation 1 in the report (September 11, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, the owner shall:

 

i.          Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the rehabilitation, restoration and  protective measures to be taken, keyed to the approved Conservation Plans referenced in Recommendation 1.a. and 1.b.i. in the report (September 11, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         Provide a Letter of Credit in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure the conservation work included in the Conservation Plans referenced in Recommendation 1.a. and 1.b.i. in the report (September 11, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

iii.        Provide full documentation of the existing heritage property at 4 Howard Street including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8"x10" colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format and 600 dpi resolution keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as maybe available to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

d.         That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall:

 

i.          Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs for the heritage properties referenced in Recommendation 1.b.ii. in the report (September 11, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work has been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plans and that the work has maintained an appropriate standard of conservation to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner for each of the heritage properties at 603 Sherbourne Street, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road, and 76 Howard Street.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreements for the properties at 603 Sherbourne Street, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road, and 76 Howard Street.

 

4.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 76 Howard Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

5.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 605 Sherbourne Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

6.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 607 Sherbourne Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

7.         If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

8.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.

 

9.         If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designations of the properties.

Origin

(September 11, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategies as generally described in this report, for the eleven heritage properties that are part of three development blocks comprising the subject development site in the North St. James Town neighbourhood.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 11, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alterations to Heritage Property; Demolition of Heritage Property; Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act; Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road, 4 Howard Street, 76 Howard Street (North St. James Town)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-62814.pdf

Speakers

Philip Day
Valerie Rodrigues
Peter Brueckner
Tom Goldspink
Rob Cadeau, Lanterra Development Limited
Kim Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP
Kevin Moore
Lee Persolja
Margaret Coshan
Chris Hallett
Sheldon Hellin
Mary Lamon
Robert Johnston
Don Hogarth
Susannah Belton
Yvonne M. Catty, and read electronic submission from Heather Senst, SRRA
Alex Murray
David Moore (Submission Filed)
Richard S. Warner
Rosemary Graydon
Linda Brett, on behalf of self and the Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association
Dermot Sweeny, Sweeny Sterling Finlayson & Co. Architects Inc. (Submission Filed)
Mary Barratt
William Phillips
Roland Naujoks
Marlene Racine
Margaret Coshan, reading submission of Timon Shaw

Communications (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Larry Lowenstein (TE.Supp.TE28.8.1)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Richard Warner (TE.Supp.TE28.8.2)
(November 17, 2013) E-mail from Sheila Hill and Norma MacInnis (TE.Supp.TE28.8.3)
(November 17, 2013) Letter from Christopher and Cindy Allen (TE.Supp.TE28.8.4)
(November 15, 2013) Letter from Linda A. Brett (TE.Supp.TE28.8.5)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Brian and Susan Magee (TE.Supp.TE28.8.6)
(November 18, 2013) Letter from Linda A. Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association (TE.Supp.TE28.8.7)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Catherine Temelcoff (TE.Supp.TE28.8.8)
(November 18, 2013) Submission from Paula Vopni (TE.Supp.TE28.8.9)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Vickie Rennie (TE.Supp.TE28.8.10)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Ruth Hall (TE.Supp.TE28.8.11)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Diane Parsons (TE.Supp.TE28.8.12)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Timon Shaw (TE.Supp.TE28.8.13)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Caroline Kaiser (TE.Supp.TE28.8.14)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Don Hogarth (TE.Supp.TE28.8.15)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Valerie Rodrigues (TE.Supp.TE28.8.16)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from Dermot Sweeny (TE.Supp.TE28.8.17)
(November 19, 2013) Submission from David Moore (TE.Supp.TE28.8.18)

Communications (City Council)

(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Lee Persolja (CC.New.TE28.8.19)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Timon Shaw (CC.New.TE28.8.20)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Avram Paul (CC.New.TE28.8.21)
(December 15, 2013) E-mail from Robert Mathe (CC.New.TE28.8.22)

8a - Alterations to Heritage Property; Demolition of Heritage Property; Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act; Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road, 4 Howard Street, 76 Howard Street

Origin
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on November 5, 2013, considered the following:

 

1.         (September 11, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Alterations to Heritage Property; Demolition of Heritage Property; Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act; Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements – 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road, 4 Howard Street, 76 Howard Street (North St. James Town).

 

2.         Communications:

            (October 26, 2013) E-mail from Sally Gibson (PB.Supp.PB26.3.1)

(November 4, 2013) E-mail from Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association (PB.Supp.PB26.3.2)

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

-           Scott Weir, ERA Architects Inc.

-           Linda Warth, Director, Planning and Development, Lanterra Developments

-           Linda Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Association

-           Councillor Pam McConnell

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to Heritage Property; Demolition of Heritage Property; Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act; Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - 603, 605-607 Sherbourne Street, 6-16 Glen Road, 4 Howard Street, 76 Howard Street (North St. James Town)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63700.pdf

TE28.9 - Final Report - Local Area Study - Lands Along the CN Rail Tracks from Queen Street West to Dupont Street - Ward 18

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the Study, entitled "Besides the Tracks: Knitting the Rail Corridor Back to the Community", attached at Attachment 1 to the report (November 4, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council direct City Staff to use this framework to review development applications as well as infrastructure investment in the long-term for the lands within the Study Area.

 

3.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, in consultation with appropriate City Divisions, to report back in the first quarter of 2014 on an implementation strategy, including quick hits to move forward with elements of the "Besides the Tracks" Study.

Origin

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

In March 2011, Toronto and East York Community Council requested City Planning to conduct a review of lands abutting the CN railway, which form the western boundary of Ward 18. The Study did not look at land use as this was being considered through the Municipal Comprehensive Review, but focused on opportunities to improve this area and better connect it to the surrounding neighbourhood. The result will help the City to proactively respond to any development proposals in the area and plan for the long-term investment and revitalization of these lands. The Study responds to a unique combination of factors including relatively large industrial sites lacking local infrastructure immediately bounded by stable neighbourhoods. In addition, the area is under increasing development pressures. 

 

City staff, the Ward Councillor and members of the community have worked together to develop a vision for new development and direct infrastructure investment within the Study Area. In addition, an inter-divisional staff team worked on the project and were involved in developing the recommendations. The Study outlines short-term and long-term recommendations pertaining to parks, the transportation network (including new roads, bikeways, parking and walkways), heritage buildings, urban design and community services and facilities.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Local Area Study - Lands Along the CN Rail Tracks from Queen Street West to Dupont Street - Ward 18 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63438.pdf
Attachment 1 - "Besides the Tracks: Knitting the Rail Corridor Back to the Community" - Final Report - Local Area Study - Lands Along the CN Rail Tracks from Queen Street West to Dupont Street - Ward 18 - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63439.pdf
Attachment 1 - "Besides the Tracks: Knitting the Rail Corridor Back to the Community" - Final Report - Local Area Study - Lands Along the CN Rail Tracks from Queen Street West to Dupont Street - Ward 18 - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63493.pdf
Attachment 1 - "Besides the Tracks: Knitting the Rail Corridor Back to the Community" - Final Report - Local Area Study - Lands Along the CN Rail Tracks from Queen Street West to Dupont Street - Ward 18 - Part 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63494.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Todd Ambachtsheer (TE.Supp.TE28.9.1)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Andrea Dawber (TE.Supp.TE28.9.2)

TE28.10 - Request for Directions Report - 2131 Yonge Street and 32 Hillsdale Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning and other appropriate staff to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to seek refusal of the Official Plan and Zoning Amendment applications for the following reasons:

 

a.         The site is not within the Yonge-Eglinton Urban Growth Centre.    

 

b.         The proposal is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, does not conform to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and is not consistent with the Official Plan.

 

c.         The proposal is inconsistent with the Council-approved Tall Buildings Design Guidelines.

 

d.         The proposal represents an over-development of the site.

 

2.         City Council authorize City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor to secure services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as may be required by the Chief Planner should the proposal be approved in some form by the Ontario Municipal Board.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to redevelop the subject site at 2131 Yonge Street and 32 Hillsdale Avenue.  The current use, a large retail store (The Art Shoppe), is to be demolished.

 

The proposed mixed commercial-residential redevelopment consists of a 38-storey (123.85 metres) north tower and a 29-storey (98.70 metres) south tower (excluding mechanical penthouses).  The height in storeys of both towers includes a common 6-storey base. The north tower includes a proposed restaurant on the 38th floor.

 

A total of 693 residential units are proposed and 497 parking spaces plus 3 car-share spaces are provided in an underground garage.  The total proposed gross floor area is approximately 9.0 times the lot area.  The lot includes the parkette on Hillsdale Avenue East which is owned by the applicant and leased to the City.

 

The base consists of retail uses on floors 1 and 2, residential units on floors 3 to 5 and a residential amenity level on the 6th floor.

 

The applicant has appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board prior to Council making a decision on their request for Official Plan and zoning amendments.  This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

 

The proposed development on a site outside of the Yonge-Eglinton Urban Growth Centre (UGC) is not consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement and neither does it conform to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe or the Official Plan. 

 

The proposed massing and tower heights of 38 storeys (124 metres) and 29 storeys (99 metres) on a lot abutting a Neighbourhoods designated area does not fit its built or planned context.  The proposal does not comply with the policies of the Official Plan, including Section 4.5 which requires transition between areas of different intensity and scale (by stepping down in height among other methods), particularly towards lower scale Neighbourhoods.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 2131 Yonge Street and 32 Hillsdale Avenue East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Request for Directions Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63428.pdf

Speakers

Cynthia MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(November 18, 2013) Letter from Cynthia A. MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP (TE.Supp.TE28.10.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-41342.pdf

TE28.11 - Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Austin Terrace

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 1807 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the lessee of the property at 1 Austin Terrace.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council grant authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement between the City of Toronto and the lessee of the property at 1 Austin Terrace.  The site contains Casa Loma, which is owned by the City of Toronto and operated as a tourist attraction.  The Heritage Easement Agreement will cover the exterior and interior of the building as well as the grounds.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 22, 2013) Report from Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Austin Terrace
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-62817.pdf

11a - Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Austin Terrace

Origin
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on November 5, 2013, considered a report (October 22, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Austin Terrace.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Austin Terrace
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63701.pdf

TE28.14 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 14 Blevins Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council not designate the property at 14 Blevins Place (Dickinson Tower, Regent Park South) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Origin

(September 19, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 14 Blevins Place (Dickinson Tower, Regent Park South) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.  Located northwest of River and Shuter Streets in Regent Park South, the Dickinson Tower (1958) is the last remaining structure from the development of the planned community as it developed in the 1950s and was listed on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties in 2005.

 

At its meeting of May 14, 2013, the Toronto and East York Community Council adopted with amendments TE24.42, entitled "325 Gerrard Street East - Regent Park - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report", outlining the applications made by the Toronto Community Housing Corporation to amend the previous development permissions for the Regent Park revitalization area.  As part of the applications, the heritage property at 14 Blevins Place is proposed for demolition.

 

In order to preserve the cultural heritage values and attributes of the Dickinson Tower at 14 Blevins Place and refuse the demolition of the building, City Council must state its intention to designate the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 19, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 14 Blevins Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-62881.pdf

Speakers

Hani Afrah
Zahran Munas

Communications (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) E-mail from Larry Webb (TE.Supp.TE28.14.1)
(November 18, 2013) E-mail from Mary Henkelman (TE.Supp.TE28.14.2)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Kate Sellar (TE.Supp.TE28.14.3)

14a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 14 Blevins Place

Origin
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on November 5, 2013, considered the following:

 

1.         (September 19, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 14 Blevins Place.

 

2.         Communications:

            (October 31, 2013) E-mail from Nick Crampton (PB.Supp.PB26.8.1)

(November 4, 2013) E-mail from Larry Webb (PB.Supp.PB26.8.2)

(November 4, 2013) E-mail from Azeb Wondemagegnehu (PB.Supp.PB26.8.3)

(November 5, 2013) E-mail from Kate Sellar (PB.Supp.PB26.8.4)

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

-           Kevin Moore

-           Mary Henkelman

-           Remo Agostino, The Daniels Corporation

-           Debra Dineen, Regent Park Neighbourhood Initiative

-           Heather Grey-Wolf, Development Director, Toronto Community Housing Corporation

-           Hani Afrah

-           Nasser Naoshad

-           Councillor Pam McConnell

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 14 Blevins Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63705.pdf

TE28.15 - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 263-265 Queen Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a revised transmittal on this Item (TE28.15b with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council include the property at 263-265 Queen Street East on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.

Origin

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the property at 263-265 Queen Street East on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.  Located on the south side of Queen Street East, east of Sherbourne Street, the site contains a pair of two-storey commercial buildings.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 263-265 Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-62816.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 6, 2013) Revised Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 263-265 Queen Street West (TE28.15b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64799.pdf
(December 4, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 263-265 Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64859.pdf

Speakers

Denise Baker, 2235441 Ontario Limited

Communications (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) Fax from Scott C. Hutchison, Henein Hutchison LLP, solicitors for 2235434 Ontario Limited and sister company 2235441, owners of 263-265 Queen Street East (TE.Supp.TE28.15.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-41171.pdf

15a - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 263-265 Queen Street East

Origin
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on November 5, 2013, considered a report (October 22, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 263-265 Queen Street East.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Inclusion on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 263-265 Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63703.pdf

TE28.16 - Partial Repeal of Designating By-law - 550 Gerrard Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that

 

1.         City Council state its intention to partially repeal City of Toronto By-law 410-2000 under Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act, designating the property at 550 Gerrard Street East pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, to remove the references to the portion of the site legally described as Plan 66R-26519, Part 2 from Schedules "B" and C" of the designating By-law 410-2000.

 

2.         It there are no objections to the proposed partial repeal of By-law 410-2000, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council to partially repeal the by-law pursuant to Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are objections to the proposed partial repeal of By-law 410-2000, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed repealing by-law to the Conservation Review Board for submission of a report to City Council for its final decision.

 

4.         If the partial repeal of By-law 410-2000 is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the proposed partial repeal of By-law 410-2000.

Origin

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council partially repeal City of Toronto By-law 410-2000 designating the property at 550 Gerrard Street East (Don Jail) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to remove the portion of the site described as Plan 66R-26519, Part 2 from the legal description.

 

As part of the Bridgepoint Health Master Plan, City Council approved the redevelopment of the lands including the historic Don Jail.  The development approvals involved a series of land exchanges between the City and Bridgepoint Health.  In the context of the first phase of land exchanges, the City of Toronto gave an undertaking to seek Council Authority to partially repeal the designating by-law for the Don Jail to remove from the legal description the land conveyed to the municipality for public highway purposes.  The existing legal description for By-law 410-2000 will be amended to remove the references to the City-owned land, while the Reasons for Designation protecting the historic Don Jail and its environs remain unchanged.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Partial Repeal of Designating By-law - 550 Gerrard Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-62815.pdf

16a - Partial Repeal of Designating By-law - 550 Gerrard Street East

Origin
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on November 5, 2013, considered a report (October 22, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Partial Repeal of Designating By-law - 550 Gerrard Street East.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Partial Repeal of Designating By-law - 550 Gerrard Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63693.pdf

TE28.17 - Hubbard and Wineva Properties - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter Into Heritage Easement Agreements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
At 2:40 pm on December 18, Council reopened this item and voted to defer consideration of the item. The preliminary decision previously posted on this item has been deleted.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 1 Hubbard Boulevard (Hubbard Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

2.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 3 Hubbard Boulevard (Hubbard Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 5 Hubbard Boulevard (Hubbard Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

4.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 7 Hubbard Boulevard (Hubbard Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

5.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 9 Hubbard Boulevard (Hubbard Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

6.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 11 Hubbard Boulevard (Hubbard Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

7.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 2 Wineva Avenue (Wineva Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

8.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 4 Wineva Avenue (Wineva Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

9.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 6 Wineva Avenue (Wineva Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

10.       City Council state its intention to designate the property at 8 Wineva Avenue (Wineva Fourplex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

11.       If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, the solicitor be authorized to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

12.       If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, the Clerk be directed to refer the proposed designations to the Conservation Review Board.

 

13.       If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the properties.

 

14.       City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owners of the properties at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 Hubbard Boulevard and 2, 4, 6 and 8 Wineva Avenue.

 

15.       City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreements.

Origin

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 1-3, 5-7 and 9-11 Hubbard Boulevard and 2-4 and 6-8 Wineva Avenue under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their cultural heritage value and grant authority for heritage easement agreements for the sites.  City Council listed the Hubbard and Wineva properties on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties in 2010.

 

The 10 properties on Hubbard Boulevard and Wineva Avenue are owned by the Toronto Community Housing Corporation, which is planning to sell the sites.  According to the heritage policies in the City of Toronto's Official Plan, when a City-owned heritage property is sold, leased or transferred to another owner, a heritage easement agreement will be secured.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 22, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Hubbard and Wineva Properties - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-62880.pdf

17a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - Hubbard and Wineva Properties

Origin
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on November 5, 2013, considered a report (October 22, 2013) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - Hubbard and Wineva Properties.

Background Information (Community Council)
(November 7, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into Heritage Easement Agreements - Hubbard and Wineva Properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63720.pdf

TE28.29 - Application to Remove and Injure Private Trees - 78 Queen's Park (Faculty of Law, University of Toronto)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE28.29a for information)

Communications TE28.29.1 to TE28.29.3 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to report directly to Council  on December 16, 2013, on whether the additional green space has been secured and added to Philosophers Walk as agreed to by the applicant in this process.

Origin

(October 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council approve the application for a permit to remove thirteen (13) trees and injure two (2) trees, all situated on private property. The tree removal and injury permit application has been received in connection with a Site Plan Control application to permit the renovation and construction of an addition to the Faculty of Law buildings at the University of Toronto at the above noted address.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 28, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 78 Queen's Park (Faculty of Law, University of Toronto) - Application to Remove and Injure Private Trees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-62984.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 3, 2013) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 78 Queens Park (University of Toronto Faculty of Law) - Site Plan Application - Information Report (TE28.29a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64865.pdf

Speakers

Douglas Birkenshaw

Communications (City Council)

(December 12, 2013) Letter from Signe Leisk, Cassels Brock Lawyers, on behalf of the University of Toronto Faculty of Law building at 78 Queen's Park (CC.Supp.TE28.29.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42252.pdf
(December 14, 2013) E-mail from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, Hon. Chair, Grange Community Association (CC.New.TE28.29.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43863.pdf
(December 16, 2013) E-mail from Signe Leisk, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Lawyers (CC.New.TE28.29.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-43995.pdf

TE28.31 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 15 and 17 Woodfield Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council deny the request for a permit to remove the privately owned weeping willow tree situated on the rear property line between 15 and 17 Woodfield Road.

Origin

(September 23, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree situated on the rear property line between 15 and 17 Woodfield Road.  The application indicates the reasons for removal as due to rot and carpenter ant activity within the tree, the tree is damaging an existing deck, and broken branches have caused property damage over the last three years.

 

The subject tree is a weeping willow (Salix babylonica) measuring 117 cm in diameter.  The tree is healthy and in fair condition structurally and botanically.  Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(September 23, 2013) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 15 and 17 Woodfield Road - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63386.pdf

Speakers

Lawrence Chamberlain
Wendy Power

Communications (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) Letter from Trish Stenson and Joanne Hansen, Steven Peck and Joyce McLean (TE.Supp.TE28.31.1)
(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Whitney Taylor (TE.Supp.TE28.31.2)

TE28.42 - Status Update Report - King-Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information the report (November 4, 2013) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, entitled "King-Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study - Status Update Report".

Origin

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This report outlines the King-Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study preliminary findings and potential directions. The East Precinct is a Regeneration Area bounded by Front Street West to the south, Richmond Street West to the north, Simcoe and John Streets to the east, and Spadina Avenue to the west.  Major Secondary Plan policy objectives aim to encourage reinvestment in the area for a diverse range of employment and residential uses while preserving and reinforcing the historic scale and character of the area and enhancing the public realm.

 

With over 30 applications at various stages of review, the East Precinct has a high concentration of tall building proposals. These developments are creating a tower neighbourhood east of Spadina which was not contemplated by the in-force Plan.

 

The King-Spadina Plan was created to maintain and enhance the distinct warehouse and heritage character of the area while at the same time attracting investment by opening up land use permissions.  This plan has been largely successful in repurposing medium scale warehouse buildings and using that unique character to support the branding and visual amenity of the area.  The result has been the preservation of many heritage buildings and one of the largest concentrations of creative industries in the City.

 

However, as with some other areas of the City, this area has evolved and has now effectively become a tower neighbourhood.  The Built Form review of the area seeks to re-imagine the King-Spadina East Precinct in a way that accommodates tower forms while incorporating the character of the area that distinguishes this part of the City.  To do this, preliminary directions are to:

 

-           reinforce and maintain the special heritage character of the area;

 

-           permit tall buildings within the precinct which comply with the City's tall building guidelines (subject to the results of the on-going Heritage Conservation District Study);

 

-           update the public realm plan for the area to guide and secure higher quality sidewalks, public spaces and connections throughout the area;

 

-           complete a parks, recreation and community services study to identify services to be provided in tandem with growth;

 

-           assess hard services, transit, water, sewer and transportation for upgrades; and

 

-           achieve a balanced mix of entertainment, employment and residential uses.

 

The Built Form Study will refocus the policies for King-Spadina East Precinct to manage new towers, create an infrastructure plan and define the overall capacity of the area to absorb growth while maintaining a high quality of life for residents, employees and visitors. This will be accompanied by clear direction to enhance the quality of the public realm and character of the neighbourhood through carefully planned and managed intensification.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 4, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - King-Spadina East Precinct Built Form Study - Status Update Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63437.pdf

TE28.44 - Construction Staging Area - No. 181 Davenport Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the closure of the south sidewalk, curb lane and bicycle lane on Davenport Road, between a point 37 metres east of Hazelton Avenue and a point 54 metres further east, from December 16, 2013 to November 30, 2015.

 

2.         City Council direct that Davenport Road be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services to request the alteration and/or removal of the proposed staging area if required to accommodate Pan Am requirements during the months of July and August 2015.

 

4.         City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the construction hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

5.         City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spot lighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

Origin

(October 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority to close part of the south curb lane, bicycle lane and sidewalk on Davenport Road and establish a temporary pedestrian walkway in the closed lane.

 

Mizrahi Development Group Incorporated is constructing a 12-storey condominium at No. 181 Davenport Road.  This project requires the above closures for a period of 24 months to enable construction to proceed. 

 

The proposed staging area will be an addition to the existing staging area at No. 195 Davenport Road, which is scheduled to be complete on November 30, 2014.  No. 195 Davenport Road is being constructed by Laughlin Solutions Incorporated, which is associated with Mizrahi Development Group Incorporated, thereby allowing the staging areas to be co-ordinated.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - No. 181 Davenport Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63146.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1250 - Construction Staging Area - No. 181 Davenport Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63147.pdf

TE28.45 - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - No. 195 Davenport Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the continuation of the closure of  the south curb lane, sidewalk and bicycle lane on Davenport Road, between Hazelton Avenue and a point 37 metres east, from December 16, 2013 to November 30, 2014.

Origin

(October 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Laughlin Solutions Incorporated is constructing a 9-storey condominium at No. 195 Davenport Road.  They need to continue to close the south curb lane, sidewalk and bicycle lane on Davenport Road in order to complete their work.

 

They also need to continue to close sections of the sidewalk on Hazelton Avenue.  This matter is dealt within a companion report entitled "Construction Staging Area Time Extension – Hazelton Avenue" requiring Toronto and East York Community Council approval.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 24, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - No. 195 Davenport Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63207.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0826 - Construction Staging Area Time Extension - No. 195 Davenport Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63208.pdf

TE28.55 - Traffic Management Plan - Junction Triangle Area (Non-delegated Items)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of a pedestrian crossover at the intersection of Symington Avenue and Paton Street/Ernest Avenue.

 

2.         City Council not approve a left-turn prohibition for eastbound Bloor Street West at Perth Avenue operating from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., daily.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council referred back Recommendation 3 in the report (November 5, 2013) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District with a request that a report be submitted to the January 15, 2014 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council on the installation of a left-turn prohibition at the intersection of Dupont Street and Campbell Avenue from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., Monday to Friday.

Origin

(November 5, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting City Council receive this report for informational purposes only.

 

Transportation Services is responding to a request from Councillor Ana Bailão to report on a number of requests in the Junction Triangle Area.  The area is bounded by Bloor Street West to the south, Lansdowne Avenue to the east, and the CN tracks to the north and west.  The residents have numerous traffic concerns, including vehicle speeds and volumes, parking activity, turn prohibitions and signal timings.

 

The proposals in the Junction Triangle Area that are delegated items will be addressed in a separate report to Toronto and East York Community Council, entitled "Traffic Management Plan - Junction Triangle Area (Delegated Items)".

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 5, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Management Plan - Junction Triangle Area (Non-Delegated Items)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63718.pdf
Drawing No. T1016-4 - Traffic Management Plan - Junction Triangle Area (Non-Delegated Items)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63719.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Management Plan - Junction Triangle Area (Non-delegated Items) - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63149.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Scott Dobson, Junction Triangle Traffic Management Committee (TE.Supp.TE28.55.1)

TE28.73 - Authority to Attend an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 323 Westlake Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
31 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decision to refuse the minor variances related to 323 Westlake Avenue (B0043/13TEY, A0427/13TEY, A0428/13TEY), and to retain an outside planning consultant(s) if needed, for the hearing.

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Letter from Councillor Janet Davis, Ward 31, Beaches-East York

Summary

On July 31st, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment refused to grant consent to sever the property and four (4) variances from the former Borough of East York By-law No. 6752, in respect of the property at 323 Westlake Avenue. The applicant has appealed this refusal to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing is scheduled for January 22, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

 

The purpose of the application for severance and minor variances was to facilitate the construction of a new two-storey single family dwelling on the lot and maintain the existing one-storey single family detached dwelling on a reduced lot. The application for severance was refused on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided has not been demonstrated, the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots has not been demonstrated, the adequacy of roads, vehicular access, parking and loading facilities has not been demonstrated, and the adequacy of utilities and municipal services has not been demonstrated. The application for variances was refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan is not maintained, the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law is not maintained, the variances are not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances are not minor.

 

I am therefore seeking Council approval to attend the OMB in support of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 30, 2013) Letter from Councillor Janet Davis - Authority to Attend an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 323 Westlake Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63130.pdf
Attachment - Authority to Attend an Ontario Municipal Board - 323 Westlake Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63468.pdf

TE28.74 - Authority to Attend an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 325 Westlake Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
31 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decision to refuse the minor variances related to 325 Westlake Avenue (B0044/13TEY, A0429/13TEY, A0430/13TEY), and to retain an outside planning consultant(s) if needed, for the hearing.

Origin

(October 30, 2013) Letter from Councillor Janet Davis, Ward 31, Beaches-East York

Summary

On July 31st, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment refused to grant consent to sever the property and four (4) variances from the former Borough of East York By-law No. 6752, in respect of the property at 325 Westlake Avenue. The applicant has appealed this refusal to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing is scheduled for January 21, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.

 

The purpose of the application for severance and minor variances was to facilitate the construction of a new two-storey single family dwelling on the lot and maintain the existing one-storey single family detached dwelling on a reduced lot. The application for severance was refused on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided has not been demonstrated, the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots has not been demonstrated, the adequacy of roads, vehicular access, parking and loading facilities has not been demonstrated, and the adequacy of utilities and municipal services has not been demonstrated. The application for variances was refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan is not maintained, the general intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law is not maintained, the variances are not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances are not minor.

 

I am therefore seeking Council approval to attend the OMB in support of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 30, 2013) Letter from Councillor Janet Davis - Westlake Avenue - Authority to Attend an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63131.pdf
Attachment - 325 Westlake Avenue - Authority to Attend an Ontario Municipal Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63469.pdf

TE28.76 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
14 - Parkdale-High Park, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 29 - Toronto-Danforth, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 31 - Beaches-East York, 32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Communication TE28.76.7 has been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests for:

 

1.         Temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the following establishments during Canadian Music Week to be held from May 6 to 10, 2014 (including Sunday, May 11, 2014), with the conference segment of the event being held at The Downtown Marriott Eaton Centre:

 

Adelaide Hall, 250 Adelaide Street West
Bovine, 542 Queen Street West
Branthouse, 522 King Street West
Cameron House, 408 Queen Street West
Cheval, 606 King Street West
Cobra, 510 King Street West
Horseshoe Tavern, 370 Queen Street West
Lee's Palace, 529 Bloor Street West
Measure, 296 Brunswick Avenue
Rancho Relaxo, 300 College Street
Rivoli, 334 Queen Street West
Silver Dollar, 486 Spadina Avenue
Sneaky Dee's, 431 College Street
Supermarket, 268 Augusta Avenue
The Hideout, 484 Queen Street West
The Hoxton, 69 Bathurst Street
Underground Garage, 365 King Street West
Velvet Underground, 508 Queen Street West
Drake Underground, 1150 Queen Street West
Cadillac Lounge, 1296 Queen Street West
Cinema, 135 Liberty Street
Parts & Labour, 1566 Queen Street West
Central, 603 Markham Street
Cherry Cola, 200 Bathurst Street
Clinton's Tavern, 693 Bloor Street West
Dakota Tavern, 249 Ossington Street
The Great Hall, 1087 Queen Street West
The Great Hall – The Black Box, 1087 Queen Street West
Hard Luck, 812 Dundas Street West
Virgin Mobile Mod Club, 722 College Street
Painted Lady, 218 Ossington Avenue
Revival, 783 College Street
Tall Boys Craft Beer House, 838 Bloor Street West
The Garrison, 1197 Dundas Street West
The Opera House, 735 Queen Street East

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council declared the following to be events of municipal significance:

 

1.         20th Anniversary of Toronto's Festival of Beer to be held at the Evergreen Brickworks, 550 Bayview Avenue on the following days:

 

March 28, 2014 from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; and
March 29, 2014, from 2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.

 

2.         The Beach BBQ and Brews Festival to be held on the following days at Woodbine Park:

 

June 13, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.;
June 14, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m.; and
June 15, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m.

 

3.         Toronto's Festival of Beer 2014 to be held at Bandshell Park on the grounds of Exhibition Place on the following days:
 
July 25, 2014 from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.;
July 26, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m.; and
July 27, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m.

 

4.         Canadian Music Week to be held from May 6 to 10, 2014, at various establishments in Toronto, with the conference segment of the event being held at The Downtown Marriott Eaton Centre.

 

5.         43rd Annual Cabbagetown Forsythia Festival to be held on Sunday, May 4, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., in Wellesley Park, 500 Wellesley Street East.

 

6.         Fashion Art Toronto - Arts and Fashion Week to be held from April 22 to 26, 2014, from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. each day, at the Daniels Spectrum, 585 Dundas Street East.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of event for liquor licensing purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(October 24, 2013) Letter from Les Murray, Toronto's Festival of Beer Inc., requesting that the 20th Anniversary of Toronto's Festival of Beer to be held on March 28, 2014, from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and March 29, 2014, from 2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m., at the Evergreen Brickworks, 550 Bayview Avenue, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE28.76.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-40640.pdf
(October 24, 2013) Letter from Les Murray, Beerlicious Inc., requesting that The Beach BBQ and Brews Festival to be held on June 13, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., June 14, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m., and June 15, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m., with a beer garden, at Woodbine Park, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE28.76.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-40661.pdf
(October 24, 2013) Letter from Les Murray, Toronto's Festival of Beer Inc., requesting that the Toronto's Festival of Beer 2014, to be held on July 25, 2014, from 2:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., July 26, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m., and July 27, 2014, from 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m., at the Bandshell Park on the grounds of Exhibition Place, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE28.76.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-40662.pdf
(October 30, 2013) Letter from Letter from Verle A. Mobbs, General Manager, requesting that Canadian Music Week to be held from May 6-10, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m., including Sunday, May 11, 2014, for the establishments listed in the attachment to the letter from Ms. Mobbs. (TE.Main.TE28.76.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-40888.pdf
(November 5, 2013) Letter from Trish Finkelstein, Board Member, Cabbagetown Residents Association, requesting that the 43rd Annual Cabbagetown Forsythia Festival, to be held on Sunday, May 4, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. in Wellesley Park, 500 Wellesley Street East, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE28.76.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/comm/communicationfile-40889.pdf
(November 8, 2013) Letter from Vanja Vasic, Executive Director, requesting that the Fashion Art Toronto - Arts and Fashion Week to be held from April 22 to 26, 2014, from 5:00 p.m. - 2:00 a.m., at the Daniels Spectrum, 585 Dundas Street East, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE28.76.6)

Communications (City Council)

(December 12, 2013) Letter from Verle A. Mobbs, General Manager, Canadian Music Week, requesting that Sweaty Betty's, 13 Ossington Avenue, be added to the list of establishments requesting approval of liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. as part of Canadian Music Week (CC.Supp.TE28.76.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/comm/communicationfile-42254.pdf

TE28.77 - Bathurst Strachan Wellington Area Study Update Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information the report (November 12, 2013) from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, respecting the Bathurst Strachan Wellington Area Study Update Report.

Origin

(November 12, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The City Planning Division has initiated a study of the lands bordered by Bathurst Street, Strachan Avenue, Wellington Street West, and the Metrolinx rail corridor.  The study will engage area stakeholders, including landowners, residents and business owners to develop a long-term vision for the area.  The study will consider existing uses such as the Quality Meats operation, and the City-owned shelter, day care and Works Yard.  Recommendations will address the appropriate built form, transition and appropriate buffering of new developments, potential improvements to pedestrian, cycling and vehicle connections, enhancement of area park space, and the study area's relation to the Fort York National Historic Site and other surrounding areas to the north, east and west.

 

The first community meeting on the Study was held on October 15, 2013. Further community meetings will be scheduled through 2014.

 

This report responds to Recommendation 5 of Item PG24.5, which was before Planning and Growth Management Committee on May 16, 2013 and adopted by Council on June 11, 12 and 13, 2013 by providing an update on the status of the study and a study methodology.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 12, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Bathurst Strachan Wellington Area Study Update Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63799.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) E-mail from Prakash David, Senior Vice-President, Residential & Retail Development, Build Toronto Inc. (TE.Supp.TE28.77.1)

TE28.78 - Final Report - 356, 358, 360 and 362 Spadina Road - Residential Rental Demolition - Application to Revise Conditions Under Municipal Code Chapter 667

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council revise the conditions of approval of demolition of 356, 358 and 360 Spadina Road under Municipal Code Chapter 667 originally approved by City Council at its meeting of April 6, 2009, as item TE24.7, by deleting Recommendation 1.b which provided for the retention of the house comprising 2 residential rental units at 362 Spadina Road.

 

2.         City Council further revise the conditions of approval referred to in Recommendation 1 by approving the application to demolish the residential building at 362 Spadina Road comprising 2 existing residential rental units pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of rental housing as outlined in this report:

 

a.         the owner shall provide two (2) residential rental units in a house to be constructed on the subject site and maintained as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, comprising at least one (1) five-bedroom unit and one (1) one-bedroom unit, both of which shall be provided as rental housing for households connected to the religious centre which owns and operates the buildings at 356-362 Spadina Road;

 

b.         the owner shall not apply for a period of at least 20 years to convert to non-rental housing purposes, including by severance, nor to demolish without replacement, the 2 replacement rental units in a. above;

 

c.         the owner shall apply for all building permits required, and shall construct the replacement rental building substantially in accordance with the plans dated October 17, 2013, with any revisions to the rental unit floor plans to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

d.         the owner shall agree to complete the new replacement rental building and have the 2 rental dwelling units ready and available for occupancy prior to the date that the religious centre to be developed on the subject site opens for its operations;

 

e.         the owner shall enter into and register one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in a. to d. inclusive to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; and

 

f.         the owner shall enter into and register, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act (to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor) agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the 2 replacement rental units, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division or their designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Section 111 Agreement.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to issue preliminary approval for a Section 111 permit for the application for the demolition of 362 Spadina Road under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the satisfaction or securing of the conditions in Recommendation 2;

 

4.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 3.

 

5.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act no earlier than the issuance of the building permit which provides for the foundation of the replacement rental building, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division has given the preliminary approval referred to in Recommendation 3, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1, of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         the owner erect a residential building on site no later than two (2) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

b.         should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in condition (a), the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

6.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 111 Agreements.

Origin

(November 12, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to revise the conditions of the previous approval in 2009 of a Section 111 permit for demolition of three rental housing buildings at 356, 358, 360 and 362 Spadina Road by allowing the demolition of the fourth building at 362 Spadina.  City Council's conditions for the previously approved demolition included the retention of the building at 362 Spadina Road with two rental housing units.

 

The revised conditions would permit the demolition of 362 Spadina and require the replacement of a similar residential building at the same location with 2 residential rental units to be secured as rental housing.  This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to demolish 362 Spadina and to revise the conditions of approval under Chapter 667 for the property at 356-362 Spadina Road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 356, 358, 360 and 362 Spadina Road - Residential Rental Demolition - Application to Revise Conditions Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63830.pdf

TE28.79 - Liquor Licence Application - 261 Queen Street West, Licence No. 816427

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Touhenboku Ramen, 261 Queen Street West (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

Zuimei Co. Ltd. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 261 Queen Street West operating under the name Touhenboku Ramen (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for an indoor capacity of 28 patrons.

 

The Premises is located in close proximity to residential properties. There is concern in the community that this new establishment will cause noise and other disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated.  As such, this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Liquor Licence Application - 261 Queen Street West, Licence No. 816427
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63835.pdf

TE28.81 - Request Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 59 Barton Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board to support the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in refusing File No. A0617/13TEY with regards to 59 Barton Avenue.

Origin

(November 15, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

On September 25, 2013 the Committee of Adjustment refused an application to construct a second- storey addition over the existing one-storey semi-detached dwelling located at 59 Barton Avenue.

 

Several residents expressed significant concerns about the proposed density resulting in overdevelopment of the site, and if approved would set a negative precedence for the area. Further, the variances requested for rear and side-yard setbacks raised privacy concerns for adjacent properties. The application was refused, as the variances requested were not considered to be minor. The proposal was also found to be not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land.

 

The applicant appealed the Committee of Adjustment decision to the OMB on October 4, 2013. Case # PL131108 has been assigned and a hearing has been scheduled on March 11, 2013.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Request Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 59 Barton Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63834.pdf
Notice of Decision - Request Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 59 Barton Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63847.pdf

TE28.82 - Request Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 80 Willcocks Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

           

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board to support the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in refusing File No. A0650/13TEY with regards to 80 Willcocks Street.

Origin

(November 15, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan, Ward 20, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

On September 25, 2013 the Committee of Adjustment refused an application to construct a rear second-storey deck with stairs to ground level to the 21/2-storey semi-detached duplex located at 80 Willcocks Street.

 

The Harbord Village Residents' Association, neighbours, and area residents expressed significant concerns about the proposed construction of a second-storey deck and stairs to the ground level that would serve as a main entrance for the second and third floors. Residents opposed to this proposal cited privacy concerns with respect to the adjacent property, as well as overlook and privacy concerns for the adjoining backyards from the second-storey deck. The application was refused, as the variances requested were not considered to be minor. The proposal was also found to be not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, and not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land.

 

The applicant appealed the Committee of Adjustment decision to the OMB on October 15, 2013. Case # PL131163 has been assigned but a hearing has not yet been scheduled.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 15, 2013) Letter from Councillor Adam Vaughan - Request Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 80 Willcocks Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63846.pdf
Notice of Decision - Request Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 80 Willcocks Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63848.pdf

TE28.83 - School Bus Loading Zones - Ward 30 (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bills 1787 and 1788 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the parking regulations at the locations identified in Appendix A and Appendix B, attached to the report, entitled “School Bus Loading Zones - Ward 30”, dated October 31, 2013, from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is responding to a request from Toronto and East York Community Council to report on options to rescind the parking restrictions in school zones on weekends and during school holidays in the Toronto and East York District.

 

As the operational characteristics of school zones can vary significantly, each location must be assessed individually to determine the feasibility of allowing parking on weekend and during school holidays. 

 

This report recommends changes to one school bus loading zone in Ward 30.  As the TTC operates a regular service on the subject street, this report requires City Council approval.

 

A companion report has also been submitted with respect to streets that Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - School Bus Loading Zones - Ward 30 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63836.pdf
Appendix A - School Bus Loading Zones - Ward 30 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63837.pdf
Appendix B - School Bus Loading Zones - Ward 30 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63838.pdf

TE28.86 - 155 Wychwood Avenue - Request for Staff to Evaluate for Possible Heritage Designation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (TE28.86a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

That the Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

 

1.         Requested the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, to assess the heritage value of 155 Wychwood Avenue and report on the appropriateness of Heritage Designation to the December 6, 2013 meeting of the Toronto Preservation Board and to the December 16, 2013 meeting of City Council.

 

2.         Requested the Toronto Preservation Board to submit its recommendations on this matter directly to City Council.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's West

Summary

City Planning has received a request to demolish 155 Wychwood Avenue to allow for a commercial/condominium development.

 

The property is currently listed in the City's inventory of heritage properties. Planning staff have advised that they require direction from Community Council to allow their review process to be concluded at the December meeting of City Council.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc - 155 Wychwood Avenue - Request for Staff to Evaluate for Possible Heritage Designation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63867.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(December 6, 2013) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 155 Wychwood Avenue (TE28.86a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64800.pdf

TE28.90 - Amendment to Section 37 Agreement - 2-6 Lisgar Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the Section 37 Agreement pertaining to the property at 2-6 Lisgar Street by amending Section 3.2(1)(a) of the Agreement to extend the date for negotiations between the Owner and Toronto Media Arts Centre to March 31, 2014.

Origin

(November 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão, Ward 18, Davenport

Summary

I am writing to request that this item be added to the November 19, 2013 meeting of the Toronto East York Community Council.  This is an important issue in my Ward and is necessary to enable enough time for negotiations between the Owner and Toronto Media Arts Centre. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2013) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão - Amendment to Section 37 Agreement - 2-6 Lisgar Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-63949.pdf

New Business and Business Previously Requested - Meeting 45

CC45.1 - Report on an Inquiry into Lobbying about Request for Proposal 9144-13-7160

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(December 6, 2013) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

Recommendations

The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

This is a report by the Lobbyist Registrar on an inquiry conducted to determine whether Mr. Praveen Kumar contravened § 140-41A of the Lobbying By-law by emailing a member of Council on three occasions in July 2013 about Request for Proposal 9144 13 7160 for Professional Services, Information & Technology Services (the RFP).  Chapter 140 of the Toronto Municipal Code (the Lobbying By-law), § 140-41A provides:

 

A.        Lobbyists shall not communicate in relation to a procurement process except as permitted by applicable procurement policies and procurement documents.

 

As a result of the Inquiry, the Lobbyist Registrar found that Mr. Kumar had contravened § 140-41A by communicating about a procurement process to a member of Council with whom communications were not permitted by the applicable procurement policies and documents. 

 

The Lobbyist Registrar found that the exemption for ward constituent communications did not apply, since the emails concerned a particular procurement process and not a general neighbourhood or public policy issue.  In addition, the Registrar adopted the view taken by the City Solicitor in a previous report to Council that the restrictions on application of the Lobbying By-law such as the ward constituent exemption do not apply when the subject matter of the communication relates to a procurement process.  

 

Contravention of the Lobbying By-law is a provincial offence for which an individual is liable on a first conviction to a fine of not more than $25,000.

 

Mr. Kumar stopped all communications about the RFP on July 12, 2013, when he was advised that this was not permitted.  He attended a training session on the Lobbying By law offered by the Office of the Lobbyist Registrar (OLR).  There is no previous record of Mr. Kumar having contravened the Lobbying By-law.  Considering all of these factors, the Lobbyist Registrar decided to take no further action against him.

Background Information

(December 6, 2013) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on An Inquiry into Lobbying about Request for Proposal 9144-13-7160 (CC45.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64667.pdf

CC45.2 - Report to Council Regarding MM41.25 Requesting Mayor Ford to Respond to Recent Events

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(December 5, 2013) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

City Council adopted a six – part motion (MM41.25) on November 13, 2013 regarding the conduct of Mayor Ford.  The motion asked "the Integrity Commissioner to report back to City Council on the concerns raised in Part 1 through 5 above in regard to the Councillors' Code of Conduct." This report:

 

1.         identifies the Code of Conduct concerns arising from MM41.25;

 

2.         identifies other issues arising from MM41.25;

 

3.         discusses Member of Council accountability and the enforcement of the Code of Conduct;

 

4.         recommends no additional Code of Conduct investigation or action be taken in relation to MM41.25.

Background Information

(December 5, 2013) Report from the Integrity Commissioner Regarding MM41.25 Requesting Mayor Ford to Respond to Recent Events (CC45.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64720.pdf

CC45.3 - Integrity Commissioner Report to Council: Pre-Election Briefing on Code of Conduct and Related City Policies

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
This Item will be considered after Member Motions on Tuesday, December 17

Origin

(December 5, 2013) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

City Council’s last meeting before the opening of nominations for the 2014 Municipal Election is on December 17 and 18, 2013.  This is an opportune time for members to receive a briefing on the application of the Code of Conduct and City policies during an election period.

Background Information

(December 5, 2013) Report from Integrity Commissioner on Pre-Election Briefing on Code of Conduct and Related City Policies (CC45.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64721.pdf
Attachment - Joint Interpretation Bulletin: Advisory Guidelines for Members of Council on Election-Related Issues and Members’ Code of Conduct
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64722.pdf
Appendix 1 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Articles XII and XV of the Code of Conduct
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64723.pdf
Appendix 2 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Donations to Council Member-Organized Community Events Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64724.pdf
Appendix 3 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Breifing Note - Environment Days During an Election Year
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64725.pdf
Appendix 4 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Section 4.7 Constituency Services and Office Budget Policy - "Councillor Expenses during an Election Year"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64726.pdf
Appendix 5 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Uses of City Resources During an Election
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64727.pdf
Appendix 6 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Employee Participation in Municipal Election Campaigns
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64728.pdf
Appendix 7 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Employees Seeking Election to Political Office
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64729.pdf
Appendix 8 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Integrity Commissioner and Lobbyist Registrar Joint Interpretation Bulletin: Lobbying and Municipal Elections in the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64730.pdf
Appendix 9 to Joint Interpretation Bulletin - Frequently Asked Questions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64731.pdf
(December 17, 2013) Presentation from the Integrity Commissioner, City Clerk and Lobbyist Registrar - Election Year Policies (CC45.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-65223.pdf

CC45.4 - Commemoration of Former Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau by the City of Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(December 4, 2013) Report from the City Manager

Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Toronto Office of Partnerships to continue to pursue naming opportunities, consult with appropriate stakeholders and report back to Council when a suitable site is found.

Summary

At its meeting on October 8, 2013, Council directed the City Manager to report back with respect to identifying a significant Toronto landmark which would be renamed in honour of the contribution of former Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau. The decision is available at: http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.MM39.10 

Contact was made with the family of Pierre Elliott Trudeau.  While they were pleased to hear of the interest by City Council, they asked that any naming opportunity include consultation with the community.

 

Some initial contacts were made with Harbourfront, Waterfront Toronto, and the City's Waterfront Secretariat.  However, further work is required to find an appropriate site.

Background Information

(December 4, 2013) Report from the City Manager on Commemoration of Former Prime Minister Pierre Elliot Trudeau by the City of Toronto (CC45.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64738.pdf

CC45.5 - 259 and 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road (Humbertown Plaza site) - Ontario Municipal Board Appeal and Mediation Process

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Etobicoke Centre

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(December 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report; and

 

2.         the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report and the information contained in Appendix "A" be made public at such time as Council adopts the recommendations.  All other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

This report is to advise Council of the outcome of the Ontario Municipal Board mediation process regarding a zoning and site plan appeal by the owner of the property at 259 and 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road (Humbertown Plaza site).

Background Information

(December 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on 259 and 270 The Kingsway and 1144 Royal York Road - Ontario Municipal Board Appeal and Mediation Process (CC45.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64742.pdf
(December 9, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - Appendix A - Settlement Proposal - made public on December 19, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64744.pdf

CC45.6 - 361 The West Mall and 24 Eva Road - Zoning Appeal Request for directions regarding the February 3, 2014, Ontario Municipal Board hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke Centre

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(December 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.         Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1.

 

2.         Council authorize the public release of Recommendations 1, 2 and 3 as well as Appendix "1" of the confidential attachment, if adopted by Council.

Summary

The Ontario Municipal Board (the “OMB”) has set a two week hearing commencing on February 3, 2014 to hear the appeal of a zoning amendment for 361 The West Mall and 24 Eva Road.  Discussions have been held among the parties, which have resulted in the need for further directions from City Council for the OMB hearing.

Background Information

(December 9, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on 361 The West Mall and 24 Eva Road - Zoning Appeal Request for directions regarding the February 3, 2014, OMB hearing (CC45.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64776.pdf
(December 9, 2013) Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix 1 - made public on December 24, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64778.pdf

CC45.7 - Submissions to the Ontario Legislature on Bill 69 - Prompt Payment Act, 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(December 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor and the City Manager recommend that:

 

1.               City Council authorize the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the City Solicitor and/or his/her delegate, as appropriate, to make oral and/or written submissions to the Ontario Legislature, including any standing committees or other bodies, to express the City's concerns with respect to Bill 69 - Prompt Payment Act, 2013, and any subsequent bill or regulations dealing with these issues.

Summary

In the Ontario Legislature, a private member's bill seeks to introduce new legislation regarding payment for construction services.

 

This bill proposes legislation that restricts the ability of parties to negotiate payment terms and may have adverse consequences on owners of construction projects, including the City, if it is passed without amendment.

 

The bill has passed second reading with the support of all three provincial parties and has been referred to a Standing Committee, where it is anticipated it will be considered in the new year.

 

Municipalities were not consulted on this bill. The Association of Municipalities of Ontario has written to the leaders of all three provincial parties opposing it.

 

Staff seeks authority from City Council to make oral and/or written submissions to the Ontario Legislature setting out the City's concerns with this proposed legislation

Background Information

(December 9, 2013) Report from the City Manager and the City Solicitor on Submissions to the Ontario Legislature on Bill 69 - Prompt Payment Act, 2013 (CC45.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64779.pdf
Appendix A - Bill 69 - Prompt Payment Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64826.pdf
Appendix B - Letter from AMO to Provincial Party Leaders dated November 13, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64827.pdf

CC45.8 - 625, 629 and 637 Yonge Street and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Isabella Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Directions Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Origin

(December 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Recommendations

The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director to report directly to the February meeting of City Council with a Request for Directions Report regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 625, 629 and 637 Yonge Street and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Isabella Street.

Summary

The applicant has referred the Zoning By-law Amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  A pre-hearing conference was held on November 18, 2013 and a further pre-hearing is scheduled for February 19, 2014.  A hearing date is scheduled for July 14 to July 25, 2014.

 

The application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a mixed-use development consisting of a 40-storey building, including a 4-storey base building.  The proposed density is approximatley 20 times the lot area.

 

A placeholder report was submitted to the October 17, 2013 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council indicating that a detailed report was being prepared by staff and would be submitted to Toronto and East York Community Council on October 17, 2013 or directly to City Council on November 13 and 14, 2013.

 

As the application was still under review by staff a detailed report was not submitted to the October 17, 2013 Toronto and East York Community Council meeting or to the November 13 and 14, 2013 meeting of City Council.

 

At its meeting in November City Council passed a motion requesting that the Chief Planner and Executive Director report directly to the December 16-17, 2013 meeting of City Council with a Request for Directions Report regarding the Zoning By-law Amendment application for 625, 629 and 637 Yonge Street and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Isabella Street.

 

This application continues to be under review by staff and discussions are continuing on a without prejudice basis with the applicant.  In this regard, staff are not yet able to report, and are recommending that a report be brought forward directly to the City Council meeting to be held in February.

Background Information

(December 3, 2013) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 625, 629 and 637 Yonge Street and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Isabella Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Directions Report (CC45.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-64796.pdf

Member Motions - Meeting 45

MM45.1 - 454-464 Yonge Street, Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Revision to Final Recommendations in TE26.13 - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item TE26.13. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Bill 1796 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Item TE26.13 by:

 

a.         reducing the required minimum number of parking spaces by 50 spaces;

 

b.         requiring no parking spaces for live/work units; and

 

c.         stipulating that any financial payments secured under Section 37 of the Planning Act, other than for public art, may also be used for such other purpose as the Chief Planner may determine in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

2.         City Council determine that pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is required to be given in respect of these changes to the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment.

Summary

At its meeting of October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013 in connection with Item TE26.13, City Council approved a zoning amendment for the lands at 454-464 Yonge Street, subject to further revisions regarding parking requirements.

 

The owner of the site has since requested that, in accordance with earlier discussions with the Ward Councillor, the required minimum number of parking spaces be reduced by a further 50 spaces and  no parking spaces be required for live/work units.  This request is made in consideration of the owner's earlier commitment to provide a payment of $500,000.00 for the purposes of bicycle sharing stations in the area.  This request would require an amendment to the proposed zoning by-law amendment previously approved by Council at its meeting of October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013.

 

In addition, the zoning by-law amendment should also stipulate that any financial payments secured under Section 37 of the Planning Act, other than for public art, may also be used for such other purpose as the Chief Planner may determine in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

Requires Re-opening

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE26.13 – City Council meeting on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.1.)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64565.pdf

MM45.2 - 2014 as the Commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the start of World War I, and the 75th Anniversary of the Commencement of World War II - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson recommends that:

 

1.         City Council recognize the importance of 2014 as the commemoration of the 100th Anniversary of the start of World War I, and the 75th anniversary of the commencement of World War II, and remember with respect and appreciation those citizens who gave their lives in the defence of Canada, originally from the City of Toronto between 1914 - 1918, as well as 1939 - 1945, together with all Canadians who have participated in defending the freedom of Australia and Canada in both wars.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to delegate to staff under his direction, the responsibility of organizing appropriate events, in desirable locations, in conjunction with appropriate military and private sector partners to commemorate both of these historic events which Torontonians actively participated in.

 

3.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to apply for funding assistance to the Department of Canadian Heritage and Veterans Affairs Canada which has announced it can fund a diverse array of World War related projects, including commemorative events and ceremonies, learning materials, exhibits, interpretive programming, plaques and monuments, educational websites. The Department can also fund a wide range of Canadian funding applicants, including non-profit organizations, educational institutions, Aboriginal organizations, municipal, provincial and territorial governments and private sector companies (for projects that are not for profit in nature).

Summary

2014 marks the 100th Anniversary of World War I, and the 75th Anniversary of World War II. Both of these wars saw large numbers of Torontonians participate. This participation had a huge impact culturally, economically, and socially on the City of Toronto.

 

Residents of the City of Toronto were a significant part of Canada's sacrifices and contributions to World War I which changed its history and enabled it to become more independent. For the first time in its history, Canadian forces fought as a distinct unit, first under a British commander and then under a Canadian-born commander. The highpoints of Canadian military achievement during the First World War came during the Somme, Vimy, and Passchendaele battles and what later became known as "Canada's Hundred Days". Canada's total casualties stood at the end of the war at 67,000 killed and 173,000 wounded, out of an expeditionary force of 620,000 people mobilized (39 percent of mobilized were casualties).

 

During World War II, many Torontonians were part of the 1.1 million Canadians who served in the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Of these more than 45,000 lost their lives and another 54,000 were wounded. By the end of the War, Canada had the world's fourth largest air force, and third largest navy. As well, the Canadian Merchant Navy completed over 25,000 voyages across the Atlantic. The war had significant cultural, political and economic effects on Toronto as a result of this conflict.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.2)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64586.pdf

MM45.3 - 150th Anniversary of Canadian Confederation - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to engage with citizens and neighbouring municipalities to create a regional strategy for 2017, and host local sessions in libraries, arenas, and community centres to educate citizens about the Centennial and plan for the Sesquicentennial.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to promote our community to the provincial and federal governments with a view to staging a major Sesquicentennial event in Toronto.

 

3.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to review our local Centennial history, and look to other past celebrations which may provide inspiration for 2017 planning.

 

4.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to create a Toronto: 2017 Planning Committee to begin forming partnerships, consulting with residents, residents associations, as well as private sector organizations in planning Toronto-based 2017 initiatives.

Summary

Canada will celebrate a milestone in 2017: the 150th anniversary of the coming into force of the British North America Act (now the Constitution Act, 1867) on July 1, 1867.

 

Canada's federal government has the celebration planning well under way. Planning for this big celebration throughout Canada is going to be quite complex and time-consuming. It will be a major milestone in our country’s history.

 

Canada’s 100th birth anniversary celebration which concluded with the Expo in Montreal in 1967 is still fondly remembered by Canadians. It gave a big boost to this country’s profile around the globe. The celebration in 2017 would give Canadians another opportunity and excuse to reflect and celebrate this country’s history, natural beauty, cultural diversity and a lot more. This year-long celebration will be an opportune time to encourage Canadians – young and old – to appreciate what a wonderful country Canada is.

 

We need to keep in mind while celebrating Canada’s sesquicentennial the drastic change in its demographics (and Toronto's) which has taken place during the past 50 or so years. Canada of 2013 is totally different from Canada of 1867 and even of 1967. For the first 100 or so years of its existence, this country was made up mostly of  Aboriginal persons as well as people of European heritage in general and British and French heritage in particular.

 

The federal government should ensure that all of these communities are well represented in these celebrations. It will be an excellent time to showcase what Canadians have been able to achieve in every sphere during the past 150 years.

 

In this regard, a recent Ipsos-Reid poll of 1,021 Canadians found the vast majority of Canadians would like ordinary citizens, business leaders and private groups to plan the activities for the 2017 celebration. The Federal Department of Canadian Heritage, along with the provincial and local governments, can greatly assist and support the citizens in making the festivities a truly grassroots, historic and memorable celebration for our 150th birthday.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.3)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64587.pdf

MM45.4 - Public Library Access to E-Books and E-Magazines - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Community Development and Recreation Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Department of Canadian Heritage and the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sport to investigate publishers’ restrictive practices in making e-books and e-magazines available to public libraries, including the higher prices charged to public libraries.

Summary

The proliferation of e-book devices and the increased availability of e-content have led to a greater number of Torontonians wanting to borrow e-books and e-magazines from their public library. Demand has grown significantly at Toronto Public Library (TPL) with use surpassing one million in 2012, which represents an increase of 105 per cent over 2011, and this trend is continuing in 2013. Recently, TPL made e-magazines available for borrowing for the first time and Torontonians quickly responded borrowing magazines for their tablets and other devices.

This trend in use and demand at public libraries is international in scope. Despite this, public libraries face many challenges in making e-books and e-magazines available because publishers either will not sell their content to public libraries or place special conditions such as significantly higher prices. Over the past 18 months, progress has been made with more publishers making their content available. However, some e-book pricing and distribution restrictions continue to make it difficult for Toronto Public Library to serve Torontonians. This situation with publishers places pressures on Toronto Public Library's collections budget and restricts Torontonians’ access to content from their public library.

The Toronto Public Library Board is committed to providing Toronto residents with equitable and accessible public library service that provides universal access to a broad range of human knowledge, information and ideas in all its forms. Refusing to sell e-books or e-magazines to public libraries or imposing other terms that unreasonably increase costs undermines Toronto Public Library's ability to serve Torontonians and are not the answer to a healthy publishing industry.

 

This Motion endorses the important role of public libraries in making content available to all Torontonians and encourages publishers to make e-books and e-magazines available to public libraries on fair and reasonable terms.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.4)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64588.pdf

MM45.5 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing -Support of Committee of Adjustment Decision - 8 Deforest Road (B30/13EYK, A229/13EYK, A230/13EYK) - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board to support the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in refusing Minor Variance Application B30/13EYK, A229/13EYK, A230/13EYK with respect to 8 Deforest Road.

Summary

The application from the owners of 8 Deforest Road is to sever the lot into two and build a house on each lot.  This development will set a precedent that will encourage continued overdevelopment altering this neighbourhood contrary to the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw.  These variances are not considered desirable or appropriate development of the land and these changes will have a major, not minor, impact on the residents and future of the community.

 

Community Planning staff does not comment on minor variances frivolously and they submitted a decisive Planning opposition report, with compelling reasons to refuse this development.

 

Frontage and Built Form

 

The frontage of the conveyed lot will be 6.18 m, only slightly above half the permitted amount in the by-law, which is 12 m.  This is a major difference, not a minor one.  The Planning Report comments cite Policies 4.1.5 and 4.1.8 in the Official Plan about physical character and lot frontage standards in their opposition to this variance: in addition to creating an undersized lot, the conveyed property will have an integral garage facing a lot line with a frontage less than 7.62 m, creating a starkly different built form on the conveyed property.  The package sent to the committee and my office from the residents of 6 Deforest Road contains a mock-up of a house built on the conveyed land, demonstrating how out of place a house on that small lot would look, especially in this neighbourhood.

 

On-Street and Off-Street Parking and Soft-Landscaping/Flooding

 

As a result of this severance, the owner of the retained property (now 8 Deforest Road) needs a variance for a lost parking spot, which is now on what would become the conveyed portion of the property.  It is not stated explicitly but it is clear in their plans that the retained portion will be requesting a front yard parking pad. There are currently two parking spots for 8 Deforest Road on the property as it is.  With the severance, 8 Deforest Road would lose both of those, which is why they're asking for a front yard parking pad.  But that is only one parking spot so they would still require an on street parking permit for one of the two vehicles that is seen parked on their driveway.

 

Deforest Road is a street with permit parking that is full, and has a waiting list. There are 44 parking spots available and 44 parking permits issued, with two residents on a waiting list. The proposed front yard parking spot, whether on the east or west side of the front yard of 8 Deforest Road would require altering a curb cut in some way.  Doing so even slightly will result in the loss of a permitted parking space on the street.  I have spoken with Transportation staff and they inform me that should that happen, the last resident to have received a parking permit will have it rescinded and be placed at the bottom of the waiting list.

 

I also want to point out that the conveyed lot has practically no room for soft landscaping and we would lose close to half of the soft landscaping at 8 Deforest Road that already exists if they are permitted to build a parking spot in their front yard. The loss of soft landscaping contributes to the problem of storm water run-off and flooding across the City.  Storm-related flooding is becoming a very serious problem for more and more of us here in Toronto, as this summer has shown us so clearly.  Front-yard parking pads contribute to this serious problem.

 

Finally, I agree with the neighbours' concerns about privacy as a result of proximity of the proposed new dwelling, and the unnecessary loss of sunlight. Privacy is a matter of concern and importance for every single one of us and it should be a point of consideration in your deliberations, in addition to all the other relevant points of contention.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.5)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64593.pdf
(October 9, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64594.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent for 8 Deforest Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64646.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 8 Deforest Road - Parts 1, 2 and 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64648.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 8 Deforest Road - Parts 4 and 5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64647.pdf

MM45.6 - On-line Listings of Registered Speakers (Deputants) - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

The City Clerk has submitted a memorandum on this Item (MM45.6a for information)

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to develop an on-line listing within www.toronto.ca/council of registered speakers (deputants), available to the general public to see for all Standing Committee, Executive Committee, and Budget Committee meetings, dealing with individual agenda matters.

Summary

At each of the City of Toronto's Standing Committees, Executive Committee, and the Budget Committee, residents appear on various items listed on the agendas who wish to make a deputation to the duly elected Toronto City Councillors.

 

As people's daily lives have become much busier with every day commitments, including work and family, it can sometimes be challenging for individuals to exercise their democratic right to appear at a suitable time before their elected representatives.

 

It would be of great benefit to everyone, including citizens, City Councillors, and City of Toronto Clerk's staff if a more suitable notification process could be created to supplement the current system in notifying residents of an estimated time of when they may need to be at City Hall to make a deputation.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.6)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64609.pdf
(December 13, 2013) Memorandum from the City Clerk (MM45.6a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64966.pdf

MM45.7 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - appeal of the Committee of Adjustment decision for 17 Thorndale Avenue (B3/13EYK, A43/13EYK, A44/13EYK) - by Councillor Peter Milczyn, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Peter Milczyn, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board meeting in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decision to refuse the consent application and variance applications at 17 Thorndale Avenue (PL131218, PL131220, PL131219).

Summary

On October 10, 2013 the Committee of Adjustment heard the application for this property in Ward 5. The Applicant was seeking approval for consent to sever this property into two undersized 7.62m lots. Further to the severance, each new Part created had eight associated variances being considered by the Committee.

 

This application was strongly opposed by the surrounding community and Planning Staff also submitted their comments to the Committee, recommending refusal of this application. As local Councillor, my objections and concerns were made clear to the Committee of Adjustment as well.

 

The Committee of Adjustment refused the Application, but it was subsequently appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

Should this consent be approved, it would change the character of the neighbourhood, and lot patterns that currently exist.

 

The Ontario Municipal Board Hearing is scheduled for May 1, 2014.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.7)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64649.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Revised Public Hearing Notice Minor Variance/Permission for 17 Thorndale Avenue - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64669.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Revised Public Hearing Notice Minor Variance/Permission for 17 Thorndale Avenue - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64670.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Revised Public Hearing Notice on Consent for Thorndale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64671.pdf
Appointment for Hearing for Environment and Land Tribunals Ontario - 17 Thorndale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64672.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 17 Thorndale Avenue - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64685.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 17 Thorndale Avenue - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64734.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent for 17 Thorndale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64735.pdf
(October 3, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, on 17 Thorndale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64737.pdf

MM45.8 - Co-ordination of Construction Projects - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request that all capital projects that will be constructed by the City directly, and through its agencies and corporations, and which could impact the City's right-of-way, be co-ordinated through the Major Capital Infrastructure Coordination Office (the "MCIC Office").

 

2.         City Council request the heads of City divisions, agencies and corporations to ensure that their respective plans for construction which could impact the City's right-of-way be co-ordinated through the Major Capital Infrastructure Coordination Office in accordance with the timelines and procedures established by that Office.

 

3.         City Council direct the Division Head responsible for any major capital and maintenance projects to offer local Councillors a briefing on any projects in their wards that may cause significant traffic disruption, and that this information be provided to the local Councillor's office at the same time as the Major Capital Infrastructure Coordination Office is informed of any new or amended projects.

Summary

In recent months I have spoken with a number of Councillors who have expressed frustration at what appears to be a lack of coordination of construction-related road disruptions in their wards.  In some cases this is combined with a lack of consultation with Councillors' offices by various City divisions responsible for this work.

 

A recent example in Ward 23 involves the shutting down of four lanes of Bayview Avenue, at Byng Avenue, at the same time as two lanes of Yonge Street were closed down in the same area due to watermain construction.

 

Both were non-emergency City projects. The local Councillor was advised of the simultaneous lane closures two days before the work began. He was further advised by the City staff responsible for this work that there was no requirement that a local Councillor be consulted regarding such work. It would also appear that the City Office which is assigned the task of coordinating such projects was not given the opportunity to do so in this instance. 

 

As any lack of co-ordination of major construction projects on roadways clearly has a negative impact on motorists and contributes to traffic congestion with an accompanying loss of productivity and personal time, it is appropriate that the City take steps to ensure that this work is co-ordinated and that input from local Councillors is sought at the earliest possible stage.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.8)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64666.pdf

MM45.9 - Temporary Delegation to the Chief Planner - Authority During Council Recesses to Direct Attendance at Ontario Municipal Board Hearings - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1          City Council delegate to the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, during the following time periods, the authority to direct City staff to attend at Ontario Municipal Board Hearings on appeals of Committee of Adjustment decisions where City Planning staff have made written submissions to the Committee of Adjustment on the application;  the delegation shall include the authority to direct the City Solicitor to appeal a Committee of Adjustment decision on behalf of the City where City Planning staff have commented in writing on the application and the authority to direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Hearing:

 

a.         from the completion of City Council's December 16, 2013 meeting to the start of City Council's February 19, 2014 meeting; and

 

b.         from the completion of City Council's August 27, 2014 meeting to the start of City Council's December 11, 2014 meeting.

 

2.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning to submit a status report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the use of the delegated authority during these recess periods.

Summary

At the conclusion of the City Council meeting scheduled for December 16 and 17, 2013, City Council will not hold another regular Council meeting until February 19, 2014.  Similarly, following its August 27 and 28, 2014 meeting, City Council will not meet to consider regular business until December 11, 2014.  During these periods it is likely that there will be decisions arising from applications to the Committee of Adjustment which will be matters of concern to the City and would warrant the City's attendance at the Ontario Municipal Board either on an appeal by the City itself or on the applicant's appeal to the Board.

 

The purpose of this Motion is to delegate temporary authority during these recess periods to the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning to instruct the City Solicitor, and appropriate City staff, to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board where City Planning staff has written to the Committee of Adjustment on the application.  This would include the authority to direct the City Solicitor to file an appeal of a decision.  The discretion to send appropriate City staff to the OMB will be that of the Chief Planner.  As City staff would be available to provide evidence at the Hearing, there will be no financial implications to this delegated authority.  The City's position at the Hearing would be consistent with City Planning staff's written comments to the Committee of Adjustment.

 

This is an urgent matter as this is the last opportunity to delegate authority to the Chief Planner prior to the winter recess.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.9)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64683.pdf

MM45.10 - Request to rescind Council decision on EY20.19, payment-in-lieu of parking for 2438 Lake Shore Boulevard West - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.     City Council rescind its decision exempting 2438 Lake Shore Boulevard West from the Mimico Zoning parking requirement of three parking stalls and refund the applicant's $7,500.00 payment-in-lieu of parking. 

Summary

In November of 2012, City Council approved Item EY20.19 which authorized payment in lieu of parking for 2438 Lake Shore Boulevard West. Council authorized zoning relief for three parking stalls subject to a $7,500.00 payment-in-lieu of parking.

 

The applicant has indicated that they intend to pursue the matter through the Committee of Adjustment.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17. 2013 as MM45.10)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64746.pdf
(December 17, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65177.pdf

MM45.11 - Intention to Designate under the Ontario Heritage Act - 2 Station Road - Revision Required to the list of Heritage Attributes - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item EY28.7. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the following Revised List of Heritage Attributes for 2 Station Road, dated December 6, 2013:

 

REVISED LIST OF HERITAGE ATTRIBUTES

 

Heritage Attributes

The heritage attributes of the property at 2 Station Road are:

 

  • The Wesley Mimico United Church building
  • The placement, setting and orientation of the church building on the northwest corner of Station Road and Mimico Avenue
  • The scale, form and massing of the long rectangular three-storey plan with the engaged transepts at the four corners and the narthex at the south end
  • The materials, with brick cladding and brick, stone, wood and glass detailing
  • The low-pitched gable roof with parapets, stone coping, and the clerestory with window openings
  • On the principal (south) façade, the stepped frontispiece with stone and brick band courses and buttresses
  • The main (south) entrance, where steps lead to a trio of round-arched openings, with a pair of wood doors with glass inserts and transoms in each opening
  • Surmounting the south entry, the monumental round-arched opening that incorporates round and round-arched windows
  • The fenestration on all elevations, with the round-arched and flat-headed window openings with brick trim, and the stained glass windows in some of the openings
  • The buttresses on the east and west elevations that organize the pairs of window openings
  • The square tower, which is located midway along the east elevation and has corbelled brickwork beneath a multi-side spire with gothic detailing (the original entrance to the church was on the east wall of the tower)

Summary

City Council on November 13, 14, 15 and 18, 2013, adopted Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY28.7, headed "Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 2 Station Road". 

 

Previous negotiations with the owners of the property resulted in a revised List of Heritage Attributes, which included deletion of the following two attributes:

 

           On the east elevation, the secondary entry, which is placed in the transept

           The iron fence

 

In addition, the Etobicoke York Community Council, on November 19, 2013, deleted the following heritage attribute:

 

           On the interior, the sanctuary, with the vaulted and beamed ceiling supported on two pillars above the suspended and laminated wood floors

 

This Motion contains a Revised List of Heritage Attributes.

 

Requires Re-Opening

Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY28.7 – City Council meeting on November 13, 14, 15 and 18, 2013, only as it relates to the list of Heritage Attributes.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.11)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64747.pdf

MM45.12 - Poised for Growth: Developing a Food and Beverage Innovation Centre - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Economic Development Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to enter into discussions with the Executive Director of the Alliance of Ontario Food Processors to determine the feasibility of and viable approaches to the Alliance's recommendation to establish a Food and Beverage Innovation Centre, and report on the results of these discussions to the Economic Development Committee, such report to include the terms of reference for a Task Force to be populated by industry, academia and other stakeholders in order to pursue this development in Toronto.

Summary

Toronto's food and beverage cluster is of great importance to the region, and along with Chicago, New York and Los Angeles, is one of the largest food and beverage clusters on the continent.  About 47.2 percent of Ontario's employment in the food and beverage sector was in Toronto CMA in 2010. The total annual sales in the Toronto Census Metropolitan Area (CMA) were estimated to be approximately $17 billion or about 47 percent of Ontario's annual sales of $35 billion in 2010.

 

In the Toronto CMA, there are approximately 995 food and beverage manufacturing establishments employing over 60,000 people (Sources: Canadian Business Patterns, Dec. 2012; and Labour Force Survey, 2012).

 

Within Ontario, Toronto dominates the provincial food industry with more than half of all the food processing in the province taking place within the Greater Toronto region.  A recent white paper on the food and beverage processing industry in Ontario, produced by the Alliance of Ontario Food Processors, calls the sector "The New Engine of Ontario's Economy".

 

In its recent white paper the Alliance of Ontario Food Processors made, as its number one recommendation to "Establish a Food and Beverage Innovation Centre dedicated to food and beverage processing, innovation, business development and incubation in order to drive a new level of processor competitiveness both domestically and globally."  Since Toronto has been a provincial leader in food business incubation with the establishment of the Toronto Food Business Incubator pilot in 2007, industry is once again looking at Toronto to lead.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.12)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64784.pdf

MM45.13 - Closure of the Cities Centre at the University of Toronto - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         Recognizing the importance of academic research on urban issues and the interplay between the community sector, academia, and public policy, City Council formally express its desire to a see strong, funded and interdisciplinary research centre in urban studies, such as the Cities Centre, continue at the University of Toronto.

 

2.         City Council forward this Motion to the President of the University of Toronto, its Governing Council, as well as the Faculty of Arts and Science Council.

Summary

On December 2, 2013, a public announcement was made regarding the closure of the Cities Centre at the University of Toronto.

 

In the news bulletin, senior advisors of the Cities Centre stated that the University administration decided to close the Centre as it now exists, which is a stand-alone centre at 455 Spadina Avenue. The Cities Centre consists of a director, administrative staff, offices for university researchers, work spaces for visiting scholars and students, a library, and meeting rooms. The Centre also has an explicit mandate to link scholars and institutional partners both on and off campus.

 

Although efforts are underway to preserve some of the Centre's considerable urban research heritage, the loss of valuable services and crucial networks linking academic researchers and the broader community of professionals and policy-makers both in Toronto and globally, is a devastating one. 

 

The Cities Centre, and similar research centres, provide critically important research that supports good public policy at Toronto City Hall. The Cities Centre's work highlighted the growing importance of urban centres, and provided critical academic research on urban issues. Numerous reports, including the groundbreaking "Three Cities within Toronto" by Professor David Hulchanski came out of the Cities Centre, and drove much good work within the City.

 

This Motion expresses Council's regret at this decision by the University of Toronto, and its desire to see a strong urban studies program and research on cities continue at the University. The closure of the Centre is a step in the wrong direction. 

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.13)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64785.pdf

MM45.14 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Committee of Adjustment Decision respecting 106 Newlands Avenue - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 106 Newlands Avenue to support the Committee of Adjustment decision to refuse the consent and variances, and to retain outside consultants as required.

Summary

On August 8, 2013 the Committee of Adjustment refused consent and minor variance applications brought by the owner of 106 Newlands Avenue in order to sever the property into two new parcels and develop a new two-storey single family residential dwelling on each.  Variances from the Zoning By-law were sought as follows:

 

1.         To permit the proposed lot frontages of 10.38 metres and lot areas of 348.03 square metres for each of the new parcels, where the Zoning By-law requires a minimum frontage of 12 metres and a minimum lot area of 464 square metres.

 

2.         To permit the proposed coverage of 33.4 percent for each parcel, where the Zoning By-law permits a maximum coverage of 33 percent.

 

The Committee of Adjustment's decision was appealed by the owner on August 27, 2013.

 

This Motion is brought forward to authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment decision and ask that the consent and variances be refused, and to retain outside consultants as required. The reason for seeking refusal is based upon assertions from residents across the community that the proposal is significantly incompatible with the existing neighbourhood and the variances being sought will alter the nature of the current community.

 

This Motion is brought forward on an urgent basis because the Ontario Municipal Board hearing is this regard is now scheduled to commence on Wednesday, January 16, 2014, and it is necessary to give instructions to City staff to proceed and to prepare for this Ontario Municipal Board hearing.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.14)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64786.pdf
Committee of Adjustment - Notice of Decision Minor Variance/Permission on 106 Newlands Avenue (Part 1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64789.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Notice of Decision Minor Variance/Permission for 106 Newlands Avenue (Part 2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64787.pdf
Committee of Adjustment - Notice of Decision on Consent on 106 Newlands Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64788.pdf
(December 17, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65228.pdf

MM45.15 - Release of Section 37 Funds, 1030 King Street West, for Restoration and Renovation of the College-Montrose Early Years Centre to the Shaw Street Centre, 180 Shaw Street - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2013 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $25,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 1030 King Street West, (source account XR3026-3700493), for renovations for the relocation of the College-Montrose Early Years Centre to the Shaw Street Centre.

 

2.         City Council forward the funding of $25,000.00 to College-Montrose Early Years Centre upon the signing by College-Montrose Early Years Centre of an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements.

Summary

The College-Montrose Early Years Centre (CMEYC) is a not-for-profit child facility that offers early learning and family support services to over 2,000 families annually. Since 1983, it has offered places and spaces for adult caregivers (parents/grandparents/nannies and other care providers) and their children under the age of six to play, learn, share parenting ideas and build a community. The Centre is staffed by trained professionals who understand child development and are knowledgeable about best practices in adult education.

 

The scope of the renovations being made includes the repurposing of over 4,000 square feet of space in the old Shaw Public School - now known as Artscape Youngplace - into an early learning and family support environment. This space is made up of four rooms:

 

-           An infant room with two infant diaper change areas ensuite and kitchenette

-           A toddler/preschool room with ensuite three toilet child washroom including a toddler diaper change table and accessible adult washroom. This room also includes a kitchenette with a fridge, microwave, art sink and counter.

-           A multi-purpose room including a full kitchen for cooking meals and snacks as well as a meeting area for parenting workshops and community meetings

-           An administrative office area for staff with two small private offices and 45 work stations.

 

While construction of the base building began in 2012, the College-Montrose Early Years Centre  construction began in October of 2013 and is expected to be complete by December 31, 2013.

 

The $25,000 in Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 1030 King Street West was secured as part of a $1 million contribution for capital projects such as the King-Liberty Village Pedestrian and Cycle link, restoration and renovation of Artscape’s Shaw Street Centre, and renovations for the College-Montrose Early Years Centre relocation to Shaw Street Centre. The College-Montrose Early Years Centre will sign an Undertaking governing the purpose of the funds and the financial reporting requirements before the funds are forwarded.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.15)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64790.pdf
(December 17, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65178.pdf

MM45.16 - Protecting Communities and Helping Small Businesses by Improving the Licensing of Bars and Restaurants - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Licensing and Standards Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Gord Perks, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO), to establish a working group consisting of interested Councillors, Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas, relevant residents associations and industry associations for the purpose of establishing a framework for better compliance and enforcement of City by-laws as they relate to restaurants, bars and entertainment establishments, including possible changes to the provincial liquor licensing processes, and that the Executive Director report back to the Licensing and Standards Committee in 2014 with recommendations for moving forward.

 

2.         City Council support the recently tabled Bill 150, The Liquor Licensing Statue Law Amendment Act, 2013, which allows municipalities to have greater control over licensing entertainment establishments within their boundaries, and City Council express its support for Bill 150 in writing to the Province of Ontario and MPPs, including the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing.

Summary

Toronto has a vibrant and growing culinary and entertainment industry. The hospitality industry employs thousands of Torontonians and many visitors come to our city to enjoy the diversity it has to offer.

 

However, in some communities, tension is building between bars, restaurants and the surrounding neighbourhoods. While a handful of establishments may cause the problems, neighbours are left to oppose most new establishments because of both the process and their past experiences. Rather than being placed in a defensive position, we should be encouraging new entrepreneurs who are willing to be good neighbours by following our by-laws and regulations that protect surrounding neighbourhoods.

 

I am proposing we bring residents and businesses together to find solutions to community concerns and that we request changes to the AGCO licensing process to facilitate better enforcement of by-laws for communities and more predictability in the licensing process for business operators.

 

The causes of community concerns go beyond simply the bad practices of a handful of businesses. The institutions, by-laws and resources allocated to enforcement do not meet the task of protecting communities while helping create a fair playing field for businesses. Further, the provincial AGCO regulations, procedures and enforcement practices are failing our communities.

 

All of these shortcomings and the frustrations that have resulted, are forcing communities to oppose liquor license, patio and Committee of Adjustment applications, out of a legitimate fear of the potential impacts on their quality of life.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.16)

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM45.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64791.pdf
Bill 150 An Act to amend various statutes with respect to liquor licensing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64943.pdf

MM45.17 - A Co-operative and Co-ordinated Approach to Planning Ontario Place and Exhibition Place - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to enter into a formal co-operative venture with the City, to jointly plan and revitalize the Ontario Place and Exhibition Place Lands.

 

2.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to work with the local City Councillor in the revitalization of Ontario Place and the scheduling and delivery of public meetings.

 

3.         City Council request the City Manager to utilize the current City staff working group to develop the general terms of a draft agreement to guide this co-operative venture, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Chair and Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, and the local Councillor, and report back to the Executive Committee in 2014 on status and next steps.

 

4.         City Council request the City Manager to include in the 2014 report an outline of a master planning process including public consultation and the local councillors in keeping with best practices for the waterfront.

Summary

The Province of Ontario is undertaking a planning process to transform Ontario Place into a year-round, multi-use waterfront community and urban park.  The Province is currently consulting on Phase One of the Ontario Place Revitalization, the development of the Urban Park and Trail on the east island of Ontario Place.  In addition, the Exhibition Place Board of Governors has incorporated a strategic planning process to explore future opportunities at Exhibition Place.

 

At its meeting of September 26 and 27, 2011, City Council requested the City Manager "to work with the Provincial Government on potential partnership opportunities related to the governance, and operations of the Exhibition Place and Ontario Place, and report back to the Executive Committee as required."

 

It is clear that a joint strategy for revitalization would be in the best interests of the local community as well as visitors to the area as there are important city building objectives both for the larger waterfront east and west and for the local community to the north. 

 

Discussions between the Province with City staff and staff from Exhibition Place have been ongoing in an effort to understand the opportunities and challenges and work to align the redevelopment of Ontario Place with potential plans for Exhibition Place.  In order to ensure that planning for the area addresses key issues such as infrastructure, transportation, public realm, heritage and shared visitor experiences the Province and the City need to enter into a formal co-operative venture to develop a joint master plan.   The process should be modeled on best practices for waterfront planning including community consultation.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.17)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64792.pdf

MM45.18 - Pipeline Safety and Emergency Reponse Capabilities - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor John Parker

Motion Without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Manager to request Enbridge to confirm to the City Manager that it will be providing an emergency response team in 2014 in the Toronto area capable of responding to an emergency situation similar to the one that occurred on an Enbridge pipeline in Michigan at the Kalamazoo River in 2010.

 

2.         If Enbridge does not confirm that emergency response resources will be in place in 2014, City Council direct the City Manager to request funding from Enbridge sufficient for the City of Toronto to contract for those resources.

 

3.         City Council request the City Manager to report back to Executive Committee on this matter in the first quarter of 2014.

 

4.         City Council request the City Solicitor to report to City Council once the National Energy Board decision regarding Enbridge Pipelines Inc.'s Line 9B proposal has been released, in the second quarter of 2014 or earlier if the decision is available, in regards to Enbridge's emergency response capacity.

 

5.         City Council request the Office of Emergency Management to also report to City Council at the same meeting in the second quart of 2014 or earlier, on the status of the City's emergency response capabilities in relation to the National Energy Board's ruling.

Summary

The City participated in the National Energy Board's Toronto hearing regarding Enbridge Pipeline Inc.'s Line 9B proposal with intervener status.  On October 16, 2013, the City's Solicitor presented the City's final argument at the hearing.  In the City's submission, two of the primary concerns identified were emergency preparedness and emergency response capabilities.  The City's first responders are not equipped for or meant to contain a serious pipeline related emergency such as the one that took place in Michigan's Kalamazoo River.

 

During the National Energy Board hearing, Enbridge provided an example of how it is aiming to improve its emergency response capabilities and reduce its spill response times.  The company is proposing to establish a pipeline maintenance work crew in Mississauga beginning in the third quarter of 2014.  This crew would provide emergency response to any pipeline incident in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA).

 

There are no guarantees or conditions currently requiring Enbridge to construct this facility or to include within the emergency response capability.  At present, there is no adequate response team in place within the GTA to respond to a major emergency with a current or future pipeline.

 

Recently, Toronto residents discovered that Enbridge's Line 9 runs within one metre of the entrance to the TTC Finch Subway Station, next to homes of thousands of Toronto residents, in our major ravines and under the Don and Humber Rivers.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.18)

Background Information

MM45.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64956.pdf

MM45.19 - Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 148 McKee Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to support the Committee of Adjustment's decision in regards to the variances at 148 McKee Avenue for east side yard setback, west side yard setback, lot coverage, building height, main wall height, number of storeys and front yard setback, and that Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee's approval of the minor variances for 148 McKee Avenue in regards to lot frontage and lot area.

Summary

On November 20, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment North York Panel considered an application for Minor Variances submitted by Integral Design Associates, on behalf of Eco Friendly Construction Inc, to permit the construction of a new three-storey dwelling at 148 McKee Avenue. The application requested nine variances, including one for existing/proposed lot frontage of 7.62 metres where 15 metres is required, and one for existing/proposed lot area of 295.62 square metres where 550 square metres is required.

 

The Committee refused applications to allow development of this lot in 1961, 1984 and 2008. The Ontario Municipal Board upheld the Committee's decisions in 1961 and 1984. The 2008 refusal was not appealed. City Planning Staff submitted a Staff Report on the 2008 application, commenting that constructing a two-storey dwelling on a lot of this size "would result in a built form that would be incompatible with the nearby properties" and "would be out of keeping with the existing physical character of the neighbourhood". In response to the 2013 application, Planning Staff submitted a report commenting that the proposed dwelling was similar to what was proposed in 2008; therefore, they remained opposed for the same reasons.

 

At the hearing on November 20, 2013, the Committee approved the variances in relation to lot frontage and lot area. They refused the remaining seven variances. On December 10, 2013, the applicant appealed the decision of the Committee.

 

To be consistent with reports from Planning Staff, previous Committee decisions and the results of two Ontario Municipal Board appeals, it is appropriate that Council send planning staff to support the Committee decision to refuse the variances in regards to east side yard setback, west side yard setback, lot coverage, building height, main wall height, number of storeys and front yard setback, and also that the City Solicitor be authorized to appeal the approval of the variances regarding lot frontage and lot area.

 

In order to meet the appeal deadline, City legal Staff have appealed the decision pending confirmation of this action by City Council. It is therefore urgent that this matter be dealt with at this Council meeting.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as Member Motion 45.19)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64944.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel - Public Hearing Notice Minor Variance/Permission for 148 McKee Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64953.pdf
(November 19, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on 148 McKee Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64933.pdf
Memorandum to Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel, from Councillor John Filion, Ward 23 - Willowdale, on 148 McKee Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64934.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 148 McKee Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64954.pdf
(April 21, 2008) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on 148 McKee Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64955.pdf
North York Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision (November 15, 1984) and Ontario Municipal Board Decision (November 15, 2004) on 148 McKee Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64935.pdf

MM45.20 - Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 93 Cummer Avenue - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor John Parker

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
24 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor John Parker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council confirm instruction to the City Solicitor to appeal the decision of the Committee of Adjustment respecting 93 Cummer Avenue.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate in conjunction with the local Councillor and the applicant in order to seek a reduction in the variances sought, and/or additional conditions such as but not limited to limiting the impact of the dwelling on adjacent properties and the neighbourhood. These conditions are to include assurances that a second front entrance will not be constructed at a later date and that the new addition shall not be outfitted in a manner which would create an additional suite, in contravention to Zoning By-law 7625.

 

3.         In the event that a negotiated settlement is reached with the applicant pursuant to Recommendation 2 above and supported by the local Councillor, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the proposed settlement.

 

4.         In the event that a negotiated settlement is not reached pursuant to Recommendation 2 and 3 above, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain an outside planning consultant and to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the Committee of Adjustment's approval of the minor variances.

Summary

The owner applied to the Committee of Adjustment for a number of minor variances (including for east and west side yard setbacks; building length; building height; and, proposed rear balcony area) in order to permit the construction of a new second storey addition as well as a two-storey addition to the front of the existing one storey dwelling at 93 Cummer Avenue.

 

On Wednesday November 20, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel approved the minor variances (with the height variance requested having been reduced by the applicant as a result of input from City Planning staff) subject to the standard conditions of the City's Urban Forestry Division.

 

Some of the variances granted are not consistent with what has been previously approved by the Committee of Adjustment in this area, and do not meet the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law. The proposed additions would result in a dwelling that would be out of keeping with the existing physical character of the area, and would have undue impacts on the surrounding properties and the neighbourhood.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.20)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64951.pdf
Committee of Adjustment North York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission on 93 Cummer Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64952.pdf
(December 17, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65229.pdf

MM45.21 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision respecting 205 The Bridle Path (A569/13NY) - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse the minor variances related to 205 The Bridle Path (A569/13NY) and to retain outside consultants, if necessary.

Summary

An application for minor variances related to the property municipally known as 205 The Bridle Path was heard by the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment on November 9, 2013.

 

The application entailed the demolition of the existing home and the construction of a new three-storey dwelling. The applicant sought variances related to building height, setbacks and lot coverage.

 

The Committee of Adjustment refused the variance application. The applicant appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. The community has voiced significant concerns about the impact of these variances, if approved, on the neighbourhood.

 

This item is urgent because the Ontario Municipal Board hearing may be scheduled in the near future and it is necessary to give instructions to City staff to prepare for the hearing.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.21)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64878.pdf
Committee of Adjustment North York Panel - Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 205 The Bridle Path
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64879.pdf
(December 17, 2013) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65179.pdf

MM45.22 - Revisions to Proposed Zoning By-law - 2789 and 2803 Dundas Street West in TE23.3 - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item TE23.3. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent.

Bill 1789 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the proposed Zoning By-law amendment for the property at 2789 and 2803 Dundas Street West, being Attachment 8 to the report (April 9, 2013) from Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District on Item TE23.3 adopted by City Council on May 7 and 8, 2013, as follows:

 

a.         The introductory sentence to section 4 be revised to add the phrase "and 4(10)(c)" in relation to By-law 438-86.

 

b.         Subsection 4(6) be revised to add the following clause as subsection 4(6)(b)(i)(c):

 

c.         "a horizontal projection of no more than 1.8 metres at the roof slab of the 5th floor".

 

c.         The language proposed in subsection 4(8)(a)(vi) be deleted and replaced with the requirement that "a minimum of three non-residential parking spaces shall be required".

 

d.         Subsection 4(10) be revised to increase the maximum permitted ramp slope from 15% to 15.5%.

 

2.         City Council determine that the revisions made to the proposed zoning by-law are minor in nature and, pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further public notice is required in respect of the proposed zoning by-law.

Summary

On May 7 and 8, 2013, City Council adopted TE23.3 authorizing the introduction of zoning by-law to permit a mixed-use development comprising a 7-storey mixed-use building containing retail uses at grade at 2789 and 2803 Dundas Street West.  The proposed development would include a total of 109 residential units (including 5 live-work units) and three levels of below-grade parking with 96 parking space and 79 bicycle parking spaces.

 

Subsequent to the public meeting relating to the proposed by-laws, it was discovered that the site specific exemptions granted to the angular plane provision required by the By-law did not include one angular plane projection as shown in the plans and diagrams for the building which were provided to the public at the public meeting.

 

As a result of further discussion between the applicant and Transportation Services staff, two further technical amendments to the By-law are recommended, namely a reduction in the parking requirements for the non-residential (retail) component of the development and an increase in the maximum permitted slope of the ramp to the underground parking garage.  The required number of parking spaces for the retail component shall be three spaces.

 

This matter is submitted in order to facilitate the proposed changes to the by-law so as not to delay the approval of the site plan control application.

 

Requires Re-opening

Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE23.3- City Council meeting May 7 and 8, 2013 as it pertains to the proposed zoning by-law amendment.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16, and 17, 2013 as MM45.22)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64877.pdf

MM45.23 - Staff Representation at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 155 Church Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the lot severance and associated variances for 155 Church Avenue.

Summary

On November 6, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment North York Panel considered an application for Consent and Minor Variances submitted by Quicksilver Development Services, on behalf of the applicant, to permit the severance of the subject property into two residential building lots and the construction of a new two-storey dwelling on each of the proposed lots.

 

In their Staff Report, City Planning Staff recommended that the applications be refused on the grounds that the proposed severance of this lot did not respect the physical character of the neighbourhood with regards to lot frontage and area, and would not be in keeping with the intent of the Zoning By-laws.

 

On November 6, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment refused the consent applications on the grounds that the proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan, the suitability of the land for the purposes for which it was to be subdivided was not demonstrated, and the suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots was not demonstrated. The associated variances were refused on the grounds that the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was not being maintained, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and, in the opinion of the Committee, the variances were not minor. On November 25, 2013, the applicant appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

This issue is time sensitive as the City Solicitor and City Planner will require time to prepare for the hearing, which may be scheduled shortly after the next meeting of Council.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.23)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64936.pdf
(October 23, 2013) Committee of Adjustment North York Panel - Public Hearing Notice on Application for Consent for 155 Church Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64937.pdf
(October 31, 2013) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Committee of Adjustment Application for 155 Church Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64938.pdf
(November 6, 2013) Memorandum from Councillor John Filion to Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on 155 Church Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64939.pdf
(November 6, 2013) Committee of Adjustment North York Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent for 155 Church Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64940.pdf
(November 6, 2013) Committee of Adjustment North York Panel - Notice of Appeal on Consent for 155 Church Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-64942.pdf

MM45.24 - 160 Pears Avenue - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing Settlement Offer - by Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council accept the Settlement Offer contained in Attachment 1 to this Motion.

 

2          City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into Minutes of Settlement with the appellant and area residents.

 

3.         City Council instruct the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on January 9 and 10, 2014 to implement the settlement.

Summary

On July 31, 2013, the Committee of Adjustment heard and refused an application to construct a three-storey addition above an existing four-storey office building at 160 Pears Avenue. The owner appealed the Committee’s refusal to the Ontario Municipal Board and a hearing has been scheduled for January 9 and 10, 2014. At its meeting on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013, City Council adopted Item No. TE26.110 authorizing the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board to support the decision of the Committee of Adjustment.

 

Subsequent to the October Council meeting the appellant has worked with the City and local residents in order to amend their application and add conditions of approval that would help alleviate several of the concerns raised by residents at the Committee of Adjustment hearing. As a result, the appellant has amended their plans by shifting the upper floors of the addition forward towards Pears Avenue and away from the dwellings that abut the rear of the development site and have agreed to attach several conditions to the decision. The Without Prejudice Settlement Offer shown in Attachment 1.

 

This matter is deemed urgent as the Ontario Municipal Board hearing is scheduled for January 9 and 10, 2014.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.24)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65169.pdf
Attachment 1 - Without Prejudice Settlement Offier
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65194.pdf
Drawings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65170.pdf

MM45.25 - Liquor Licence Application - 1903750 Ontario Ltd. Operating as Penny's Place - 1306 Bloor Street West - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan, recommends that:

 

1.          City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Penny’s Place, 1306 Bloor Street West (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application unless appropriate conditions relating to noise, litter, safety and security, and other disturbances to residents, are attached to the liquor licence.

 

2.          City Council request the AGCO or the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.          City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the AGCO or the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. 

Summary

1903750 Ontario Ltd. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 1306 Bloor Street West operating under the name Penny’s Place (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for a capacity of 99 patrons indoors. The Premises is located adjacent to a residential area, and impacts associated with the operation of the Premises may disturb neighbouring residents. Their concerns relate in particular to noise, litter, safety and security, and other disturbances. The deadline for filing an objection to the licence was December 8, 2013.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. Under no circumstance should a liquor sales licence be granted at the Premises without appropriate conditions attached.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.25) 

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65187.pdf

MM45.26 - 303 Kingston Road - Technical Amendment to By-law No. 1019-2013 - by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Bill 1797 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.                  City Council amend By-law No. 1019-2013 by replacing the word "height" in Section 1.(b)(7) with the word "length".

 

2.                  City Council direct the City Solicitor to bring forward to Council’s meeting of December 16 and 17, 2013 for enactment by Council, a by-law to make the changes noted in Recommendation 1 to By-law No. 1019-2013.

 

3.                  City Council determine through the adoption of this recommendation that, pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further notice is to be given in respect of the changes to By-law No. 1019-2013.

Summary

At its meeting held on July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013, City Council adopted Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE25.17 which recommended amendments to the former City of Toronto Zoning By-Law 438-86 to permit the redevelopment of 303 Kingston Road with a six-storey plus mezzanine mixed-use building with 47 residential units, 5 commercial units and underground parking. City Council enacted By-law No. 1019-2013 at its meeting on July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013 to permit the development.

 

It has come to City Planning’s attention that there was a minor error in By-law No. 1019-2013 that needs to be corrected. In the abovementioned By-Law,  Section 1.(b)(7), which establishes the performance standards for the size of loading space required on the site, the word height was used instead of the word length. That is the only error in the By-law that needs to be corrected.  It is therefore appropriate that the technical amendment as set out in the Recommendations be made to By-law No. 1019-2013 without the need for any further public notice.

 

This is an urgent matter since the by-law was enacted approximately five months ago and further delay may cause hardship to the applicant.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.26)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65189.pdf

MM45.27 - Accessible Parking Space at 522 Oakwood Avenue - by Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item NY25.56. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Bill 1813 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind its previous decision to install a designated accessible parking space in front of 522 Oakwood Avenue.

Summary

City Council at its July 16 to 19, 2013, meeting approved the installation a designated accessible parking space in front of 522 Oakwood Avenue.

 

Since that time, it has come to light that an accessible parking space is no longer required at this location.

 

In order to avoid unnecessary costs, Item NY25.56 should be re-opened and rescinded as soon as possible.

 

Requires Re-opening

 

North York Community Council Item NY25.56 – adopted by City Council on July 16, 17, 18 and 19, 2013

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.27)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65193.pdf

MM45.28 - 95 and 99 Broadway and 197 Redpath Avenue - Zoning Appeal - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions and this report contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the report (December 16, 2013) from the City Solicitor, respecting 95 and 99 Broadway and 197 Redpath Avenue. 

Summary

This Motion is recommending the adoption of the recommendations in the report (December 16, 2013) from the City Solicitor, with respect to 95 and 99 Broadway and 197 Redpath Avenue Zoning Appeal.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.28)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65216.pdf
(December 16, 2013) Report from the City Solicitor on 95 and 99 Broadway and 197 Redpath Avenue - Zoning Appeal Re: TE26.18, Request for Directions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65218.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Appendix 1 - chart
Confidential Attachment 3 - Confidential Appendix 2 - correspondence dated December 13, 2013

MM45.29 - Programming in Toronto Community Housing Dwellings - Request to Waive Parking Fees - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request Toronto Community Housing to waive parking fees for community organizations, who provide programming in Toronto Community Housing buildings, and provide them with parking passes. 

Summary

A number of community organizations and outreach groups provide necessary programming at Toronto Community Housing dwellings across the City of Toronto.  These programs nurture and support the community children of all ages from pre-school into their teenage years.  The organizations who provide the programming are groups well known and accredited by the City, many also rent space in our City owned facilities.

 

Providers who serve our residents have been asked to pay for parking at the Toronto Community Housing buildings.  This added expense has been a strain on all organizations budget, as they struggle to provide essential programming to educate and guide our children.

 

This added fee has deterred organizations to enhance and increase their programming as the parking fees have reached $3000.00 per annum or more.  Parking fees for community organizations recognized by the City of Toronto should be waived.  The City of Toronto, through Toronto Community Housing, should not be charging program providers for parking fees in lieu of increased programming.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.29)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65197.pdf

MM45.30 - Supporting the "Count Me In" Initiative - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to report back to City Council, through the Economic Development Committee, on a strategy such that:

 

a.         the City of Toronto can support and promote the Count Me In event on April 29, 2014;

 

b.         working with the City of Toronto Partnership Office, an assessment can be undertaken on the degree to which the events can be supported by corporate partners in the Greater Toronto Area; and

 

c.         the Toronto District School Board is consulted to explore how the School Board can support the event and encourage participation by students.

Summary

“Count Me In Toronto” is the world's largest youth-run empowerment event promoting volunteerism. Count Me In impacts students in an intimate atmosphere with engaging speakers and entertainers, uniting to share powerful messages inspiring volunteer action. Designed and run entirely by students, the unique single-day event motivates and empowers today's youth to become leaders in their local communities. Count Me In helps connect students with community service opportunities that match their interests and lifestyle. Their innovative field-trip style events spark community involvement, local volunteer action, student leadership and positive social change.

 

In 2014, Count Me In will be moving their annual provincial Ontario event to the City of Toronto, and will be hosting the one-day field trip at The Sony Centre on April 29, 2014.

 

The event will unite grade 7-12 students and educators from across Toronto and around Ontario for a day promoting community engagement, active citizenship and local volunteerism.

 

Count Me In was founded by Toronto teen, Shane Feldman.

 

In 2013, Shane was named one of Canada’s Top 20 Under 20 by the Orders Of Canada panel.

Today, Count Me In is recognized as a registered Canadian charity, and the largest youth-run movement in Canada, promoting volunteerism.

 

This Motion is urgent as the window for the City of Toronto to be a major partner on the "Count Me In" movement is very narrow.  The event is scheduled for April 29, 2013 and it is vital that City staff start working on this worthy cause immeidately.

 

(Submitted to City Council as MM45.30)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65222.pdf

Communications

(December 18, 2013) Submission from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 10 - York Centre - background information about the Count Me In Program (MM.New.MM45.30.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/comm/communicationfile-44260.pdf

MM45.31 - School Zone Safety - by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Karen Stintz

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item MM39.7. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Karen Stintz, recommends that:

 

1          City Council rescind Part 2 of its decision on MM39.7.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to:

 

a.         pilot the use of enhanced pavement markings such as zebra markings, curb markings, stencilling, enhanced signage and additional visual aids such as flashing beacons, at Allenby Junior Public School, John Ross Robertson Junior Public School and Ledbury Public School to improve safety within their respective school zones;

 

b.         meet with the respective School Traffic Safety Committees to determine the most appropriate meassures that can be implemented as part of the Pilot, and evaluate and report back on the effectiveness of the various measures used; and

 

c.         include the results of the pilot as part of Transportation Services School Zone Safety Committee final submission as per MM39.7 adopted at City Council on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013.

Summary

City Council at its meeting on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013 adopted MM39.7, and in so doing adopted the following Part 2:

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to consider the school zone reviews, which are currently underway at Allenby Junior Public School and John Ross Robertson Junior Public School to be pilot programs for signage, pavement marking, education campaigns and enforcement to improve pedestrian safety, and that the results of the pilot programs be included in the above-mentioned report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.

 

This Motion recommends that City Council re-open that Item to rescind that direction.

 

This Motion is urgent because staff are unable to establish a School Zone Safety Working Group as directed by City Council, without an amendment to Item MM39.7.

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16 and 17, 2013 as MM45.31)

 

Requires Re-opening

 

Member Motion MM39.7 – City Council meeting on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013 only as it pertains to Part 2.

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65172.pdf

MM45.32 - Procurement Policies and Practices - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report to the February 24, 2014 meeting of the Government Management Committee on:

 

a.         procurement issues related to construction contracts raised by Council at its December 16, 17 and 18, 2013 meeting;

 

b.         procurement policies in other jurisdictions which recognize local or national content;

 

c.         hiring/jobs requirements within the procurement policy, including the status of Toronto's Canadian Content Policy;

 

d.         an examination of the differences in the City's and the Toronto Transit Commission's procurement policies, including the Toronto Transit Commission's Canadian procurement practices;

 

e.         a review of evaluation criteria and under what circumstances the City may not award a contract;

 

f.          a review of contract performance including how performance on behalf of the City's agencies and corporations can be used as an evaluation criteria;

 

g.         any other major differences between the City's procurement policy and other City of Toronto agencies and corporations, as appropriate.

Summary

City Council, at its December 16, 17 and 18, 2013 meeting during consideration of Item PW27.3 raised a number of issues about the City's procurement policies and practices.

 

Members of Council would benefit from a report that responds to the issues raised on the construction contract for the Humber Treatment Plant, in particular, and on other procurement policies, in general.

 

This Motion is urgent as Council needs these important policy clarifications since the City is continually tendering and awarding major contracts. 

 

(Submitted to City Council on December 16, 17 an 18, 2013, as MM45.32)

Background Information

Member Motion MM45.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-65230.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 45

BL45.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact general bills and confirming bills.

Background Information

(December 24, 2013) Consolidated By-law Index for December 16, 17 and 18, 2013 City Council meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2013/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-64925.htm
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council