City Council

Meeting No.:
54
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Tuesday, July 8, 2014

Wednesday, July 9, 2014

Thursday, July 10, 2014

Friday, July 11, 2014

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
clerk@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed.  The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

 

Members of Council and Staff:  Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended.  The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements:  If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

July 3, 2014


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at  www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

 

 

 

Routine Matters - Meeting 54

RM54.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All
Attention
Council has voted to consider the following items at specific times on Friday July 11:

First item Friday July 11:
PW32.19 - Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program for Non-Residential Charitable Sector

At 11:00 am:
PG34.1 - Eglinton Connects Planning Study - Phase 1 (Part 1) Implementation Report

Lunch break will be from 11:45 am to 1:15 pm

As the first item after PG34.1:
PG34.4 - Official Plan Policies for Implementing a Development Permit System - Final Report (Ward All - Statutory: Planning Act, RSO 1990)

Summary

• O Canada
• Moment of Silence

• Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Bruce Hussey
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71415.pdf

RM54.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the meeting held on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014.

RM54.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Deferred Committee Item:

Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG33.14

 

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 43 on July 2, 2014

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, Chair

 

Report of the Audit Committee from Meeting 16 on June 27, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, Chair

 

Report of the Board of Health from Meeting 32 on June 30, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Joe Mihevc, Chair

 

Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 30 on June 25, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Anthony Perruzza, Chair

 

Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 32 on June 24, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 31 on June 16, 2014

Submitted by Councillor David Shiner, Chair

 

Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 28 on June 23, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 34 on June 19, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Josh Colle, Vice Chair

 

Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 32 on June 18, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 15 on July 2, 2014

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 34 on June 17, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 33 on June 17, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 33 on June 17, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, Chair

 

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 33 on June 17, 2014

Submitted by Councillor Paula Fletcher, Chair

 

New Business submitted by City Officials

RM54.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM54.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

RM54.6 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

Order Paper July 8, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71328.pdf
Order Paper July 9, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71369.pdf
Order Paper July 10, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71366.pdf
Order Paper July 11, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71496.pdf

Deferred Item - Meeting 54

PG33.14 - Implementing a Local Appeal Body for Toronto - Public Consultation Comments and Guiding Principles

(Deferred by City Council from June 10, 2014 - 2014.PG33.14)
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PG33.14.3 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the establishment of a Local Appeal Body to hear appeals of minor variances and consent applications;

 

2.         City Council approve the following eight guiding principles for implementing the Local Appeal Body (LAB):

 

Guiding Principle One - Appointment of LAB Members

LAB members will be recruited using a fair and impartial recruitment process where the most qualified candidates are appointed by City Council.

 

Guiding Principle Two - Qualifications of LAB Members

The members will have reputable adjudicative experience, familiarity with land use planning and planning law, demonstrated ability to make sound, balanced decisions, and will be free of conflicts of interest.

 

Guiding Principle Three - LAB Member Remuneration

LAB members will be remunerated at a level that ensures they are able to effectively perform their role and function to achieve fair and balanced hearing decisions.

 

Guiding Principle Four - Oversight and Accountability of LAB Members

The LAB will operate as an independent decision making body free from influence by outside parties. It will be subject to the City's Code of Conduct for Members of Adjudicative Boards and will conduct itself in accordance with the Statutory Powers Procedures Act, the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act and the Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.

 

Guiding Principle Five - LAB Practices and Procedures

The LAB will determine its own hearing practices and procedures in accordance with relevant legislation such as the Statutory Powers Procedure Act and the City of Toronto Act.

 

Guiding Principle Six - LAB Structure and Relationship with the City 

The LAB will be structured to provide efficient and timely due process with administrative support from the City.

 

Guiding Principle Seven - Costs of Implementing and Maintaining a LAB

The City will provide adequate start-up and ongoing operating funding to the LAB to ensure that it functions effectively and independently and in a manner that upholds fair due process for all the parties involved in the hearing.

 

Guiding Principle Eight - Appeal Filing Fees for the LAB

In establishing fees for the LAB, Council will be guided by the legislation which governs the tariff of fees for the LAB and the City's User Fee Policy and by the principles of natural justice.

 

3.         City Council direct that the amount of additional start up costs for 2015, in addition to operating and capital costs for 2015, be considered as part of the 2015 budget process;

 

4.         City Council direct that the establishment of a Local Appeal Body be co-ordinated and overseen by the City Manager and that the City Manager report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee at the August 7, 2014 meeting, with recommendations for the number and remuneration of LAB members and a proposed fee structure;

 

5.         City Council request the City Manager, in preparing the report of a recommended fee structure, give consideration to the following:

            i.          a minimum fee for all appeals; and

ii.         for appeals initiated by Committee of Adjustment applicants, the minimum appeal fee be at least equal to the applicant's Committee of Adjustment fees.

 

6.         City Council request the Province of Ontario to amend the Planning Act to provide a clear definition of a minor variance;

 

7.         City Council request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to respond to Council's previous requests for Provincial funding assistance in implementing a Local Appeal Body;

 

8.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting on August 7, 2014 on the resources required for Planning staff to report on every Committee of Adjustment application;

 

9.         City Council request that the Committee of Adjustment panels provide detailed written or oral reasons explaining their reasons for approval or refusal of applications; and

 

10.       City Council request the City Solicitor and the Open Meeting Investigator to meet with Committee of Adjustment panel members to advise them on how to conduct meetings and their discussions in an appropriate manner.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee requested the City Manager to report directly to City Council confirming availability of start-up funding in 2014 to begin the process for Local Appeal Body so that it is in place to hear all appeals made after June 1, 2015.

Origin

(May 6, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report summarizes the results of the public consultations on implementing a Local Appeal Body (LAB) for the City of Toronto to hear appeals of minor variance and consent applications.  The report also provides principles, informed by the consultation, to guide LAB implementation in the event Council decides to implement a LAB.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 6, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 - 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Implementing a Local Appeal Body for Toronto - Public Consultation Comments and Guiding Principles
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-69375.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(June 9, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Manager on Implementing a Local Appeal Body for Toronto - Public Consultations and Guiding Principles (PG33.14a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70947.pdf

Speakers

Danielle Chin, Building Industry and Land Development Association
Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto
Michael Coll, Resident

Communications (Committee)

(May 28, 2014) E-mail from Patrick Smyth (PG.New.PG33.14.1)
(May 28, 2014) Letter from Bill Birdsell, President, Ontario Association of Architects (PG.New.PG33.14.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47799.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 8, 2014) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG33.14.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48357.pdf

Executive Committee - Meeting 43

EX43.1 - Development Charge By-law - Technical Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
First Item after Member Motions on Wednesday, July 9.

Bill 683 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Development Charges Act, SO 1997

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the proposed amendment to Development Charge By-law No. 1347-2013, in Appendix 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to make such stylistic and minor changes to Appendix 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer as may be necessary to give effect to the recommendations contained herein.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee held a statutory public meeting on July 2, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Development Charges Act.  No one addressed the Committee.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report presents a proposed amendment to Development Charge By-law No. 1347-2013 for consideration at a statutory public meeting. The sole purpose of the amendment is to clarify the time at which development charges are calculated, payable and collected in cases where a development is built out in phases.

 

This technical amendment to the by-law has been developed in consultation with Toronto Building, and is recommended in addition to procedural changes that have been implemented to avoid confusion and potential loss of development charge revenue.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the City Solicitor and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Development Charge By-law - Technical Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70763.pdf
(June 11, 2014) Development Charges By-law Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70764.pdf

EX43.3 - Review of the City of Toronto's Emergency Response to the December 2013 Ice Storm

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

Emergency Preparedness and Response:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Manager, in consultation with applicable City divisions, agencies and corporations, to update the City of Toronto Emergency Plan and its Operational Support Functions and Risk Specific Plans, as per the recommendations detailed in Appendix 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager and Deputy City Managers.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Manager, in consultation with applicable City divisions, agencies and corporations, and partners, the Canadian Red Cross etc., to enhance emergency staffing capacity and maintain, at a minimum, five-deep staffing levels to ensure sufficient redundancy for the Emergency Operation Centre and at Emergency Reception Centres, and to advance training of required staff throughout the balance of 2014 using existing staff training resources.

 

3.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B to develop a proactive public education and awareness program to increase the awareness of residents and businesses on emergency preparedness measures and information in consultation with Toronto Hydro and other partners as appropriate. 

4.         City Council request that the Toronto Police Service Board direct the Chief, Toronto Police Service to work with the City Manager to develop emergency response protocols to ensure Police Officers are available to direct and control the City's highest priority traffic intersections in the event of power outages during emergency events.

 5.        City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, in consultation with all relevant City divisions, agencies and corporations, to develop a standardized process for the post-emergency review and evaluation of the City of Toronto’s response to emergency events, incorporating elements recommended through the third party peer review. 

Supports for Vulnerable Populations: 

6.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A and the Director, Office of Emergency Management, in consultation with all relevant City divisions, agencies and corporations, to establish an Emergency Human Services working group and to explore the formation of an Emergency Response Agreement with the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network, Findhelp Information Services (211), and other community-based agencies to improve implementation of the Vulnerable Persons Protocol and increase access to services for vulnerable residents during an emergency situation. 

7.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to pre-identify appropriate Community Recreation facilities to be used as Emergency Reception Centres and develop facility specific plans, including the provision of back-up power, for operational response during an emergency event. 

Emergency Communications: 

8.         City Council direct the City Manager to continue to work in collaboration with staff from Toronto Hydro, the Red Cross and other members of the City's Emergency Risk communicators' network to identify opportunities to expand and strengthen the communications tactics and communications channels that can be utilized to more effectively communicate with the public, particularly vulnerable populations, during an extended power disruption. 

9.         City Council direct the City Manager and City Clerk, in consultation with City of Toronto Councillors, the Office of Emergency Management and Strategic Communications, to develop a new Councillor Co-ordination Operational Support Function (OSF) document to support the role of Councillors during an emergency event, including protocols for the co-ordination and dissemination of information and the development of appropriate processes for training. 

10.       City Council request the City Manager to include in any enhanced emergency communications strategies, such as those suggested in Recommendations 8 and 9, the provision of American Sign Language (ASL) in televised updates and announcements.

 

311 Toronto and Toronto Hydro Contact Centre Co-ordination: 

11.       City Council request that City (311 Toronto) and Toronto Hydro expedite the development and execution of a Memorandum of Understanding that formally documents the expectations and actions of both organizations to ensure co-ordination of communications, information and requests for service related to power outages for localized and widespread events. 

Urban Forestry and Infrastructure Resiliency: 

12.       City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, in consultation with Urban Forestry, to work with Toronto Hydro to review current line clearing programs with respect to best practices and report back to City Council in the first quarter of 2015 on identified opportunities to enhance co-ordination of activities to more effectively manage the potential impact of trees in close proximity to hydro lines. 

13.       City Council request Toronto Hydro, in consultation with the City (Urban Forestry) to explore the use of infrastructure that is resilient to power outages associated with tree contact, which reduces line clearing requirements and the associated adverse impact on trees, when replacing or installing new above ground infrastructure. 

14.       City Council support Toronto Hydro's inclusion of $70 to $75 million over five years for the conversion of overhead hydro lines to underground as part of its 2015-2019 rate application to the Ontario Energy Board, and request that Toronto Hydro work with the City (Urban Forestry) to review and identify potential future priorities, where conversion of overhead lines to underground would most significantly improve the resiliency of the electrical-supply in Toronto. 

Provincial Requests: 

15.       City Council request that the Province of Ontario expand the existing provisions in the Ontario Building Code to require continuous power supply for back-up generators in certain building types (i.e., buildings more than six storeys, care occupancies and hospitals). 

16.       City Council direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report to Budget Committee once confirmation of Ice Storm expenditure reimbursements through the Provincial Ice Storm Assistance Program are received, including a funding plan for any submitted expenditures that are deemed ineligible for reimbursement under the Program. 

 

Other:

 

17.       City Council request the City Manager to report to the Executive Committee on the status of the implementation of all the above Recommendations in the second quarter of 2015.

 

18.       City Council receive the report (June 24, 2014) from the City Manager [Item EX43.3a] for information.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The City Manager gave a presentation to the Executive Committee on December 2013 Ice Storm - City of Toronto's Emergency Response Review.

 

The President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Hydro gave a presentation to the Executive Committee on Ice Storm Independent Panel Review Report Briefing.

 

The Chair, Independent Review Panel gave a presentation to the Executive Committee on Toronto Hydro Response to December 2013 Ice Storm - Independent Review Panel Report.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Managers

Summary

In response to the extreme ice storm that occurred on the evening of December 21, 2013 through December 22, 2013, a Special City Council meeting was held on January 10 and 13, 2014, at which time a number of resolutions were adopted following Council's consideration of the City Manager's report entitled Impacts from the December 2013 Extreme Winter Storm Event on the City of Toronto (CC46.1). 

 

The City Manager's report entitled December 2013 Extreme Winter Storm Event – Provincial Funding Request and Structure of Comprehensive Reviews (EX39.3) was considered on April 1, 2 and 3, 2014 and provided an update on the City's request for financial assistance from the Province and outlined the City's process to review its emergency response to the Ice Storm.

 

This report responds to Council's requests and provides the outcomes of the City's review of the emergency response. Included are a series of recommendations in six broad categories to improve the City's ability to mitigate, prepare for, respond to and recover from future emergencies.  Additional information is provided on changes to the City’s Emergency Plan and on the status of the City’s request to the Province for reimbursement of Ice Storm related costs through the Ice Storm Assistance Program.

 

1.         Emergency Preparedness and Response

 

Emergency preparedness is a shared responsibility amongst the City, its divisions, agencies and corporations, the Province, businesses, and individual residents.  To increase preparedness for future emergencies, including power outages, this report recommends enhanced public education and awareness initiatives that provide critical information to City of Toronto residents and businesses.

 

To ensure there are sufficient resources available to manage prolonged city-wide emergencies, this report also recommends enhanced staff training and a commitment from City divisions, agencies and corporations for staffing plans that, at a minimum, provide a five-deep staffing redundancy for positions within the Emergency Operation Centre and at Reception Centres.

 

Following the review of the City’s emergency response, which included an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Emergency Plan and its Operational Support Functions and Risk Specific Plan for Power Outages, this report recommends that the Emergency Plan be updated to incorporate lessons learned and that the City’s process for the review of future emergencies be further enhanced and standardized.

 

2.         Supports for Vulnerable Populations

 

To more effectively meet the needs of the City’s most vulnerable, and recognizing that this responsibility is shared with the Province, this report recommends the establishing an Emergency Human Services working group and exploring the development of an Emergency Response Agreement with the Toronto Central Local Health Integration Network, Findhelp Information Services (211), and other community-based health and social service agencies.

 

In addition, this report recommends that City staff pre-identify appropriate City-owned facilities to be used as Emergency Reception Centres for future emergencies using appropriate site selection criteria.  The sites selected will be equipped with back-up power and have supplies and equipment pre-assigned, and facility specific plans will be developed to more effectively respond to broader and prolonged emergency situations.

 

3.         Emergency Communications

 

The ability to communicate broadly to the public during prolonged and widespread power outages is a significant concern for our residents and Council.  This report recommends the development of new and enhanced tactics and channels to more effectively communicate to the public during power outages, including broader messaging through traditional media and social media and posting of emergency notices in community facilities.  City staff will also engage building operators and the business community to co-ordinate the posting of emergency information for their residents and customers.

 

In response to requests to improve communications with City Councillors, this report recommends the development of a new Emergency Plan Operational Support Function that will provide greater clarity on the role of City Councillors during emergencies and establish clear communication protocols.

 

4.         311 Toronto and Toronto Hydro Contact Centre Co-ordination

 

A number of areas have been identified in which co-ordination can be improved between 311 Toronto and Toronto Hydro’s Contact Centre.  This report recommends that Toronto Hydro and 311 Toronto develop a Memorandum of Understanding that formally documents expectations during power outages to improve services to residents.

 

5.         Urban Forestry and Infrastructure Resiliency

 

The Ice Storm resulted in wide-spread power outages primarily due to ice accumulation and fallen trees and tree limbs that damaged power distribution lines.  In order to minimize potential impacts from similar future events, this report recommends that the City and Toronto Hydro work together to improve the resiliency of hydro distribution lines by:

 

-           reviewing current line clearing practices to more effectively manage trees in close proximity to hydro lines;

-           exploring the potential use of more resilient infrastructure when above ground hydro lines are replaced or newly installed; and

-           identifying targeted priorities for the conversion of overhead hydro distribution lines to underground including critical facilities such as hospitals, water treatment plants, etc.

 

The City and Toronto Hydro will also co-ordinate on the implementation of recommended actions outlined in the Toronto Hydro Independent Review Panel Report, The Response of Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited to the December 2013 Ice Storm.   The Report’s key areas of findings and recommendations include Communications, Information Systems, Vegetation Management, System Hardening, and Resilience.

 

6.         Provincial Requests

 

In response to requests from Council regarding back-up power, particularly in high-rise buildings, this report recommends that the City request the Province to expand the existing provisions of the Building Code to require continuous back-up power in buildings more than six stories in height and/or in facilities such as hospitals and care centres.

 

The City has also submitted its Expression of Interest for reimbursement of ice storm related expenditures through the Province’s Ice Storm Assistance Program.  Current costs estimates for the City, excluding costs to Toronto Hydro, revenue losses, and tree replacement, are $77.2 million.  This report recommends that the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer report to Budget Committee once confirmation of reimbursements under the Program are received, including a funding plan for any submitted expenditures that are deemed ineligible.

 

This report focuses primarily on the City's emergency response to the December 2013 Ice Storm. Other reports prepared by City staff that relate to the City's resiliency to our changing climate and the City's response to cold weather emergencies will be considered along with this report at the Council Meeting scheduled for on July 8, 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report and Appendices 1, 2 and 3 from the City Manager and the Deputy City Managers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70933.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Appendix 4 - PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Peer Review of the City's Emergency Management Program Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70908.pdf
(May 1, 2014) Appendix 5 - Province of Ontario May 2014 Program Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70934.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Presentation from the City Manager on December 2013 Ice Storm - City of Toronto's Emergency Response Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-71052.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Presentation from Anthony Haines, President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Hydro on Ice Storm Independent Panel Review Report Briefing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-71053.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Presentation from the Independent Review Panel on Toronto Hydro Response to December 2013 Ice Storm Independent Review Panel Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-71054.pdf

Speakers

John Camilleri, President, CUPE Local 1
Katrina Miller
Councillor Sarah Doucette
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Frances Nunziata
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(July 2, 2014) Letter from John Camilleri, Cupe Local 1 (EX.New.EX43.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-48448.pdf

3a - Transmittal of Toronto Hydro’s Independent Review Panel Report - The Response of Toronto Hydro-Electrical System Limited to the December 2013 Ice Storm

Origin
(June 24, 2014) Report from the City Manager
Summary

The ice storm that occurred in Toronto in late December 2013 caused widespread electricity outages and disrupted the lives of thousands of Torontonians.  Approximately 416,000 Toronto Hydro customers lost power at one point during the ice storm, which affected more than one million City residents.

 

In January, Toronto Hydro commissioned an Independent Review Panel to look at Toronto Hydro’s performance during the storm and to confirm practices that worked well and identify areas in need of improvement.  The Independent Review Panel worked closely with Davies Consulting on the design and approach of the review and then on the identification of findings and the development of 25 recommendations for consideration by Toronto Hydro Management.  The Independent Review Panel Report, The Response of Toronto Hydro-Electrical System Limited to the December 2013 Ice Storm, was released publically on June 18, 2014.

 

As requested by Council at its meeting January 10 and 13, 2014, this report transmits the findings of Toronto Hydro’s Independent Panel to Council for information.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 24, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Transmittal of Toronto Hydro’s Independent Review Panel Report: The Response of Toronto Hydro-Electrical System Limited to the December 2013 Ice Storm
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70975.pdf
(June 24, 2014) Attachment 1 - Transmittal letter, dated June 24, 2014, from Toronto Hydro President and CEO Re: Independent Review Panel - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70997.pdf
(June 19, 2014) Attachment 2 - Toronto Hydro Independent Review Panel Report, The Response of Toronto Hydro-Electrical System Limited to the December 2013 Ice Storm
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70991.pdf

EX43.5 - 2013 Progress Report on Equity, Diversity and Human Rights (EDHR) Achievements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EX43.5.2 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the item for information.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager

Summary

The City Manager reports regularly to Council on the delivery of City programs and services to Toronto's diverse population. It is the City's priority to provide accessible and equitable programs and services to residents and employees.  In 2013, City Council endorsed 26 new Strategic Actions for 2014-2018 which build on previous directions and continue to advance Council’s vision, mission and goals.

 

Strategic Action #11 commits the City to ensuring that access, equity and diversity are embedded in all City services, policies, and programs.  Strategic Action #17 commits the City to delivering policies, programs and services that serve the diversity of our population.  Addressing equity, diversity and human rights and embedding these principles and practices in all city activities will help the City achieve Customer Service Excellence and meet legislative and policy obligations.

 

This report highlights promising and exceptional City programs, services, and initiatives from across the corporation.  Progress is reported based on the following four indicators: 1) City as Employer – Corporate Indicator; 2) City as Provider of Customer Service – Corporate Indicator; 3) Division-specific Quantitative Indicators; and 4) Division-specific Qualitative Indicators.  Compared to the 2012 Equity, Diversity and Human Rights (EDHR) Achievements Report, there has been an increase in initiatives that focus on:

 

-           Accessibility

-           Partnerships with community organizations or other levels of government

-           Embedding equity

-           Participation/civic engagement

-           Programs and services dedicated to vulnerable women, families and children

 

Similarly, there has been notable progress in the number of employees and individuals from priority groups receiving mentoring, internships and professional development opportunities.  The number of employees completing equity, diversity and human rights training has also risen significantly.

 

Number of Participants

2011

2012

2013

Internal Mentoring

234

311

426

External Mentoring

524

800

2880

Internships

1654

1462

1652

Professional Development

982

1500

8423

Participation in EDHR Training

1000

1353

1835

 

 

(See Chart titled "Corporate Indicators – City as an Employer Number of

Participants" in the Summary section of the report)

 

Further highlights of divisional achievements are provided in Appendices 1 through 4.

The Toronto Public Service (TPS) has placed renewed emphasis on access, equity and diversity as a strategic priority for 2014-2018. Looking ahead, the Equity, Diversity and Human Rights Division will be implementing a number of corporate initiatives:

 

-           Implementation of a Corporate Equity, Diversity and Human Rights Framework – the Framework will provide a strategic vision for the Toronto Public Service that is aligned to the City's Strategic Actions (2013-2018) and strengthen divisional capacity to assess the impacts of their equity, diversity and human rights initiatives.

 

-           Strengthening Equity Impact Assessment – a revised Equity Lens will help staff identify and explain the potential unintended barriers and negative impacts of policies, programs, services and other City practices.

 

-           Employment Equity – as part of the Diversity focus area of the new Talent Blueprint 2014-2018 Workforce Plan, the Equity, Diversity and Human Rights division will support a number of key activities to increase diversity in the workforce.

 

This report highlights some outstanding examples of corporate and divisional policies, programs and services that embed equity, diversity and human rights considerations.  Collaboration and partnership across divisions, agencies and corporations and with other orders of government, organizations and the private sector, produces results not obtainable by divisions working alone.  Such initiatives will continue to be encouraged, supported and shared across the Toronto Public Service, ensuring the City is responsive to the needs of our diverse communities.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager on 2013 Progress Report on Equity, Diversity and Human Rights (EDHR) Achievements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70885.pdf
Appendix 1 - Corporate Indicator - City as Employer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70856.pdf
Appendix 2 - Corporate Indicator - City as Provider of Customer Service
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70857.pdf
Appendix 3 - Quantitative Division-Specific Indicators
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70858.pdf
Appendix 4 - Qualitative Division-Specific Indicators
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70859.pdf

Speakers

Hamish Wilson
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Pam McConnell

Communications (Committee)

(July 2, 2014) Letter from Hamish Wilson (EX.New.EX43.5.1)

Communications (City Council)

(July 4, 2014) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.EX43.5.2)

EX43.6 - Recipients - 2014 Access Equity and Human Rights Awards

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council extend congratulations to the following who have been selected by a community panel as recipients of the 2014 City of Toronto Access, Equity and Human Rights Awards:

 

            Aboriginal Affairs Award:                 David Abbott

            Access Award:                                    Luke Anderson

            Pride Award:                                      Keisha Williams

            William P. Hubbard Award:               Ritu Bhasin

 

2.         City Council confirm the selection(s) made by the Constance E. Hamilton Award Selection Committee comprised of the Women Members of Council that Dr. Rosemary Moodie, Valerie Mah and Anne Ford are the recipients of the 2014 Constance E. Hamilton Award.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report advises Council of the result of the nomination process for the City of Toronto Access, Equity and Human Rights Awards. These Awards are the Aboriginal Affairs Award, the Access Award on Disability Issues, the Constance E. Hamilton Award on the Status of Women, the Pride Award for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Transsexual and Two Spirited Issues and the William P. Hubbard Race Relations Award. 

 

The recipient of the Constance E. Hamilton Award is selected by the Women Members of Council and will be a supplementary item to this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Recipients - 2014 Access Equity and Human Rights Awards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70849.pdf

6a - Recipients - 2014 Constance E. Hamilton Award

Origin
(June 17, 2014) Letter from the Constance E. Hamilton Award Selection Committee
Summary

The Constance E. Hamilton Award was established in 1979 and is named after the first woman elected in 1920 to municipal council in Toronto.  The award recognizes person(s) who have made a significant contribution to improving the social, economic, cultural and political status of women in Toronto. 

 

The Selection Committee has reviewed the nominations submitted by the public and selected the following recipients for their contributions toward improving the status of women in Toronto:

 

Dr. Rosemary Moodie

 

Dr. Rosemary Moodie exemplifies many extraordinary leadership, mentorship and advocacy qualities on the advancement of women. As president and board chair of the Young Women's Christian Association (YWCA) Toronto chapter for the past three years, Rosemary has expanded the organization's affordable and supportive housing options for young women living with mental health and addiction issues as well as low income single women and those feeling from domestic violence. She has nurtured young women's leadership on the Board of Directors and continues to empower young women by setting an example of a strong, inspiring female visionary. Her other contributions range from the medical community to childhood education both locally and internationally. She has contributed to and continues to be involved with many boards including: Food for the Poor Canada, Project for the Advancement of Childhood Education Canada, Scotiabank Foundation, St Joseph Health Centre Toronto, Goodwill Ontario, and many more. Her work touches the lives of single, low income Aboriginal women in Canada fleeing from violence and extends to children in Jamaica and Haiti who attend schools and programs her contributions have helped create.

 

Valerie Mah

 

The first Chinese woman principal in the Toronto Board of Education, Valerie Mah believes no child should go hungry in this city. Throughout her accomplished teaching career worked to establish food programs for kids and supports for moms and families, including establishing an annual Lunar New Year Banquet through TEOF (Toronto Education and Opportunity Fund) and a full-service kitchen in the Bruce School Board at the time, ensuring that all children from this working-class neighbourhood got a snack and a lunch. Also as the principal of Bruce School, she helped lead the school from closure to creating the model for Ontario's full-day kindergarten in partnership with WoodGreen and the Atkinson Foundation. This program gained international recognition for its seamless curriculum, childcare in the school classrooms and ECEs in the kindergarten class. Along with Dr. Joseph Wong, Valerie Mah was one of the founders of the Yee Hong Centre for Geriatric Care to provide high quality and culturally appropriate services for Chinese seniors.

 

Anne Ford

 

Anne Rochon Ford has been a quiet, steady and forceful champion in the City of Toronto for women's health both locally and throughout the country. Anne is currently the Executive Director of the Canadian Women's Health Network, but has a long history of advocacy and activism in support of women's health in Toronto. As a founding member of Willow  Breast  Cancer  Support and Resources Services (1994), Women  and Health  Protection (1997), the Toronto Women's Health  Network (1981),  the Ontario  Women's Health  Network  (1997), Anne  has shown  an incredible commitment and vision for inclusive  women's health agenda. Ms. Rochon Ford has edited and authored a number of important publications including The Push to Prescribe: Women and Canadian Drug Policy (2009), and "Access to Midwifery: Reflections on the Ontario Equity Committee Experience" in Reconceiving Midwifery (2004).

 

Awards Presentation

 

The Constance E. Hamilton Award will be presented during the City’s Annual Human Rights Awards Ceremony in November when the following awards will also be presented:  Aboriginal Affairs Award, the Access Award on Disability Issues, the Pride Award for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Transsexual and Two Spirited Issues and the William P. Hubbard Race Relations Award. 

Background Information (Committee)
(June 17, 2014) Letter from the Constance E. Hamilton Award Selection Committee on Recipients - 2014 Constance E. Hamilton Award
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70880.pdf

EX43.7 - Toronto Hydro Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2013 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board and personal information about identifiable individuals

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider that portion of the Council meeting at which the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager is being considered as the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Toronto Hydro Corporation by:

 

a.         Approving the "Toronto Hydro Corporation 2013 Annual Shareholder Meeting, Resolution of the Sole Shareholder – City of Toronto, Re-appointing Auditor" in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager in order to re-appoint KPMG LLP, Chartered Accountants as the auditor for Toronto Hydro Corporation for 2014, and to authorize the Board of Directors of Toronto Hydro Corporation to fix the auditor's remuneration;

 

b.         Receiving the "Toronto Hydro Corporation 2013 Annual Report, The Measure of Our Commitment", in Attachment 2 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager;

 

c.         Receiving the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Fourth Quarter 2013 Report to the Shareholder December 31, 2013", in Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager;

 

d.         Receiving the "Toronto Hydro Corporation 2013 Annual Financial Report December 31, 2013", including the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2013 and 2012", the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Ontario Securities Commission Form, Certification of Filings – CFO and CEO", and the "Toronto Hydro Corporation First Quarter Report March 31, 2014", in Attachments 4, 5 and 6 respectively to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager; and

 

e.         Receiving the "Toronto Hydro Corporation December 31, 2013 Internal Financial Statements", the "Financial Statements Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited December 31, 2013", and the "Financial Statements Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. December 31, 2013", in Confidential Attachments 7, 8 and 9 respectively to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager.

 

2.         City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 3, 7, 8 and 9 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager remain confidential in their entirety due to the security of the property of the City and securities requirements arising from Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as an offering corporation under the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16, Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as a reporting issuer under the Securities Act (Ontario), R.S.O. 1990, c.S.5, and the application by the Ontario Securities Commission of National Instrument 51-102.

 

3.         City Council receive the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2013" in Attachment 10 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager.

 

4.         City Council receive the report "Executive Compensation Disclosure Toronto Hydro Corporation 2013", in Attachment 11(a) and Confidential Attachment 11(b) to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager, and direct that Confidential Attachment 11(b) remain confidential in its entirety as it deals with personal information about identifiable individuals.

 

5.         City Council receive the "Toronto Hydro Annual Report 2013 Environmental Performance", in Attachment 12 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager.

 

6.         City Council refer the "Toronto Hydro Corporation Consolidated Financial Statements December 31, 2013 and 2012", included as part of Attachment 4 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

7.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report contains recommendations pertaining to the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario), R.S.O. 1990, c.B.16 ("OBCA") for holding the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Hydro Corporation ("THC") including receipt of Toronto Hydro Corporation's audited annual consolidated financial statements for 2013 and appointment of the auditor for Toronto Hydro Corporation for 2014.

 

This report also recommends for receipt at the Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder of Toronto Hydro Corporation, other reports provided by Toronto Hydro Corporation as required by the Amended and Restated Shareholder Direction Relating to Toronto Hydro Corporation ("Shareholder Direction") which, in addition to the OBCA requirements, include:

 

-                       Toronto Hydro Corporation's annual report;

-           Toronto Hydro Corporation's fourth quarter report to the Shareholder, internal financial statements and financial statements for its subsidiaries; Toronto Hydro Corporation has advised the City that Attachments 3, 7, 8 and 9 are confidential due to (a) the security of the property of the City, and (b) securities requirements arising from Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as an offering corporation under the OBCA, Toronto Hydro Corporation's status as a reporting issuer under the Securities Act (Ontario), R.S.O. 1990, c.S.5, and the application by the Ontario Securities Commission of National Instrument 51-102;

-                       Toronto Hydro Corporation 's Annual Information Form which is a public document published annually as required by the Ontario Securities Commission from Toronto Hydro Corporation as a public debt issuer;

-           Toronto Hydro Corporation 's disclosure of executive compensation in two parts, with the part in Attachment 11(b) being confidential as it includes personal information about identifiable individuals; and

-           Toronto Hydro Corporation 's report on environmental performance in relation to City objectives.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Toronto Hydro Corporation - Annual General Meeting and 2013 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70827.pdf
Attachment 1 - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2013 Annual Shareholder Meeting, Resolution of the Sole Shareholder - City of Toronto, Re-appointing Auditor
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70927.pdf
Attachment 2 - Toronto Hydro Corporation 2013 Annual Report, The Measure of Our Commitment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70828.pdf
(March 19, 2014) Confidential Attachment 3 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Fourth Quarter 2013 Report to the Shareholder December 31, 2013
Attachment 4 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Annual Financial Report December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70870.pdf
Attachment 5 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Ontario Securities Commission Form, Certification of Annual Filings - Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70871.pdf
Attachment 6 - Toronto Hydro Corporation First Quarter Report March 31, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70872.pdf
Confidential Attachment 7 - Toronto Hydro Corporation December 31, 2013 Internal Financial Statements
Confidential Attachment 8 - Financial Statements Toronto Hydro-Electric System Limited December 31, 2013 and 2013
Confidential Attachment 9 - Financial Statements Toronto Hydro Energy Services Inc. December 31, 2013
Attachment 10 - Toronto Hydro Corporation Annual Information Form for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70876.pdf
Attachment 11(a) Executive Compensation Disclosure, Toronto Hydro Corporation 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70877.pdf
Confidential Attachment 11(b) Executive Compensation Disclosure, Toronto Hydro Corporation 2013
Attachment 12 - Toronto Hydro Annual Report, 2013 Environmental Performance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70879.pdf

EX43.8 - Invest Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council treat the Council meeting at which this report is considered as the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the Shareholder for Invest Toronto Inc. by:

 

a.         Receiving the 2013 Annual Report of Invest Toronto Inc. titled "The Road to Success", which includes Audited Financial Statements, in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager;

 

b.         Appointing Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as the Auditor of Invest Toronto Inc. for fiscal year 2014, and authorizing the Board of Directors of Invest Toronto to fix the remuneration of such Auditor; and

 

c.         Receiving the report (June 17, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, "Invest Toronto Inc. - 2013 Audited Financial Statements", in Attachment 2 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager.

 

2.         City Council forward a copy of the 2013 Annual Report of Invest Toronto Inc. titled "The Road to Success", which includes Audited Financial Statements, in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager, to the Audit Committee for information.

 

3.         City Council receive the information concerning executive compensation disclosure in Attachment 3 in the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager for information.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) for holding the 2013 Annual General Meeting of the shareholder of Invest Toronto Inc. including receipt of its Annual Report and Audited Financial Statements and appointment of the auditor. This report also transmits information from Invest Toronto Inc. to City Council disclosing the compensation of executive officers employed by the corporation in 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Invest Toronto - Annual General Meeting and Audited Annual Financial Statements 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70888.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Attachment 1 - 2013 Annual Report from Invest Toronto Inc. titled "The Road to Success", which includes Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70868.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Attachment 2 - Report of Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on "Invest Toronto Inc. - 2013 Audited Financial Statements"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70889.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Attachment 3 - Invest Toronto - 2013 Executive Compensation Disclosure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70890.pdf

EX43.9 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation - Annual Shareholder Meeting and 2013 Audited Annual Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council treat the part of the Council meeting when this report is considered as the annual shareholder meeting for Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCH) by:

 

a.         Receiving Toronto Community Housing Corporation 's 2013 Audited Annual Consolidated Financial Statements for the period ending December 31, 2013, and the auditor's report thereon dated April 25, 2014, in Appendix A to Attachment 1 to the report (June 16, 2014) from the City Manager and forward a copy to the Audit Committee for information; and

           

b.         Reappointing PriceWaterhouseCoopers LLP, Chartered Accountants, as Toronto Community Housing Corporation's auditor until the next annual shareholder meeting at the fee provided therefor in the City’s agreement with that firm.

 

2.         City Council receive the report (May 29, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, "Toronto Community Housing Corporation  - 2013 Financial Statements", in Attachment 1 to the report (June 16, 2014) from the City Manager.

 

3.         City Council receive Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2013 Annual Report, in Attachment 2 to the report (June 16, 2014) from the City Manager, comprising the Letter to the Shareholder and Annual Report from the Corporation’s Interim President and Chief Executive Officer dated May 5, 2014 and related attachments.

Origin

(June 16, 2014) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends the actions necessary to comply with the requirements of the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) ("OBCA") for holding an annual shareholder meeting for Toronto Community Housing Corporation (“TCH”), including receipt of the 2013 financial statements and the auditor's report thereon and appointment of the auditor.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 16, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Toronto Community Housing Corporation - Annual Shareholder Meeting and 2013 Audited Annual Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70710.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Attachment 1 - Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer entitled “Toronto Community Housing Corporation - 2013 Financial Statements”
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70711.pdf
(December 31, 2013) Appendix A to Attachment 1 - 2013 Toronto Community Housing Corporation Audited Annual Consolidated Annual Financial Statements and Auditor’s Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70712.pdf
(May 5, 2014) Attachment 2 - Letter from Toronto Community Housing Corporation Interim President and Chief Executive Officer transmitting Toronto Community Housing Corporation's 2013 Annual Report, 2013 Audited Financial Statements, 2013 Eviction Statistics, 2013 Tenant Engagement Activities and 2013 Report on Sales of Standalone Properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70713.pdf
Attachment 3 - Toronto Community Housing Corporation 2013 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70714.pdf

EX43.10 - Infrastructure Ontario Refinancing of Toronto Community Housing Mortgages

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, in its capacity as Shareholder of Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCH)

 

a.         pursuant to Section 7.4.1 (a) of the City's Shareholder Direction to Toronto Community Housing Corporation approve the Term Sheet in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (the Term Sheet) between Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Infrastructure Ontario for refinancing totalling $49.7 million in order to address the renewal of 15 Toronto Community Housing Corporation mortgages totalling $19.0 million, as well as obtaining incremental financing of $30.7 million (less transaction costs and legal fees);

 

b.         approve the extension of Toronto Community Housing Corporation's mortgage subsidy for 8 properties identified in Attachment 2 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, based on the current monthly mortgage payment, until the end of 2045, both on condition that:

 

i.          the net amount of incremental financing be deposited to a new special reserve other than the State of Good Repair Fund dedicated to the repair or replacement of building components with a useful life of at least 30 years; and

 

ii.         Toronto Community Housing Corporation report annually, through Toronto Community Housing Corporation's Annual Report to Council, on the status and use of funding deposited to such special reserve.

 

c.         authorize the City Manager or his delegate to execute on behalf of the shareholder an agreement among the City, Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Infrastructure Ontario which provides a City guarantee for the repayment of the principal and interest on the mortgages in this proposal on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager or his delegate and in a form approved by the City Solicitor;

 

d.         authorize the City Manager or his delegate to execute on behalf of the shareholder an amendment to the existing 2013 Shareholder Agreement amongst the City, Toronto Community Housing Corporation and Infrastructure Ontario (for the refinancing of mortgages that required renewal in 2013) which will provide for the following on conditions satisfactory to the City Manager or his delegate and in a form approved by the City Solicitor:

 

i.          a City guarantee for the repayment of principal and interest on the mortgage loans; and

 

ii.         deletion of the existing requirement that Toronto Community Housing Corporation provide Infrastructure Ontario with a Letter of Credit in the amount of $4.5 million; and

 

e.         deem the guarantees recommended in Recommendations 1.c. and 1.d. to be in the interests of the City.

 

2.                City Council, in its capacity as Service Manager under the Housing Services Act, 2011 (the HSA):

 

a.         grant Service Manager consent to Toronto Community Housing Corporation pursuant to section 162(2) or 162(2) of the Housing Services Act, 2011 (the HSA), as appropriate, to mortgage those properties described in Appendix 1 to the Term Sheet in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer that require Service Manager consent to secure the obligations of Toronto Community Housing Corporation to Infrastructure Ontario described in the Term Sheet; and

 

b.         authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to:

 

i.          request all necessary third party waivers, consents or other authorizations which the Service Manager is required to seek in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Term Sheet in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer; and

 

ii.         provide the necessary notice to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing pursuant to Section 163 of the Housing Services Act, 2011 (the HSA).

 

3.         City Council consent pursuant to subsection 453.1(6) of the City of Toronto Act 2006 to any mortgage or charge given to Infrastructure Ontario (as Chargee) with respect to any of the properties described in Appendix 1 to the Term Sheet in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer by Toronto Community Housing Corporation and that where required the City Clerk provide a certificate, in registerable form, to Infrastructure Ontario pursuant to subsection 453.1(9) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Manager to execute and deliver such other notices, consents, authorizations and agreements on behalf of the City a shareholder or Service Manager in order to facilitate the refinancing of the Toronto Community Housing Corporation mortgages on the properties described in the Term Sheet in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, including, without limitation, amendments to the Operating Agreement between the City and Toronto Community Housing Corporation.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

In November, 2013 City Council approved the Toronto Community Housing (TCH) Ten-Year Capital Financing Plan. As part of that approval, Council directed that Toronto Community Housing initiate negotiations with potential lenders for the refinancing of Toronto Community Housing mortgages being renewed in 2014 and 2015.

 

This report seeks approval from Council for a proposal developed by Toronto Community Housing and Infrastructure Ontario (IO) which would result in the refinancing of 15 Toronto Community Housing properties with mortgages scheduled for renewal in 2014. Upon approval by Council, Toronto Community Housing will receive mortgage refinancing totalling $49.7 million. Of this total, $19.0 million will be used to pay out the existing social housing mortgages. The balance of $30.7 million represents incremental financing of which $2.9 million will be restricted for investment in future capital repairs within the pool of 15 refinanced properties and $27.9 million which will be invested to address capital needs throughout the entire Toronto Community Housing social housing portfolio.

 

The refinancing proposal will have no immediate financial impact to the City. However, Toronto Community Housing Corporation has requested a City commitment to extend subsidy funding of mortgages for 8 of the 15 properties, at current levels, to the end of the new 30-year mortgage amortization term. The extended mortgage subsidy funding has a total nominal value of $44.7 million and a present value of $19.6 million.

 

In addition, the proposed terms require that the City provide an explicit guarantee to Infrastructure Ontario for repayment of the mortgages within this proposal. They also require that the City provide a guarantee for repayment of the Toronto Community Housing mortgages that were refinanced by Infrastructure Ontario in 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Infrastructure Ontario Refinancing of Toronto Community Housing Mortgages
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70824.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Attachment 1 and Appendices 1 and 2 - Infrastructure Ontario TCH Mortgage Refinancing Proposal (Term Sheet)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70825.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Attachment 2 - Additional City Funding Commitment by Property
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70826.pdf

EX43.11 - Refinancing of City Loans to Toronto Community Housing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council, in its capacity as Shareholder of Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCH):

 

a.         pursuant to Section 6.3.1 (a) of the City's Shareholder Direction to Toronto Community Housing approve the term sheet substantially in the form attached in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (the Term Sheet) between Toronto Community Housing and the City for refinancing totalling $52.4 million in order to address the renewal of 55 Toronto Community Housing mortgages with a total outstanding balance of approximately $19.4 million, as well as obtaining incremental financing of approximately $33 million (less transaction costs and legal fees); and

 

b.         approve the extension of Toronto Community Housing's mortgage subsidy for 47 identified properties, based on the current monthly mortgage payment, until the end of 2044, both on condition that:

 

i.          the net amount of incremental financing be deposited to a new special reserve other than the State of Good Repair Fund dedicated to the repair or replacement of building components with a useful life of at least 30 years; and

 

ii.         Toronto Community Housing report annually, through Toronto Community Housing's Annual Report to Council, on the status and use of funding deposited to such special reserve.

 

2.         In order to provide the credit facilities to Toronto Community Housing, that City Council:

 

a.         authorize a loan to Toronto Community Housing in the amount of $52.4 million in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in the Term Sheet attached in Attachment 1 of the report (June 17, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer;

 

b.         authorize the City Manager or his delegate to execute a new loan agreement between the City and Toronto Community Housing substantially on the terms and conditions set out in the Term Sheet attached in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and on such other terms and conditions that are satisfactory to the City Manager or such delegate and in a form approved by the City Solicitor;

 

c.         authorize the drawing of the incremental financing amount of approximately $33.0 million from working capital; and

 

d.         deem the loan recommended in Recommendation 2.a. above to be in the interests of the City.

 

3.         City Council, in its capacity as Service Manager under the Housing Services Act, 2011 (the HSA):

 

a.         grant Service Manager consent to Toronto Community Housing pursuant to section 162(2) of the Housing Services Act to mortgage those properties described in Appendix 1 to the Term Sheet in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer that require Service Manager consent to secure the obligations of Toronto Community Housing to the City described in the Term Sheet; and

 

b.         authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to:

 

i.          request all necessary third party waivers, consents or other authorizations which the Service Manager is required to seek in connection with the transactions contemplated by the Term Sheet; and

 

ii.          provide the necessary notice to the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing pursuant to Section 163 of the Housing Services Act.

 

4.         City Council consent pursuant to subsection 453.1(6) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 to any mortgage or charge given to the City (as Chargee) with respect to any of the properties described in Appendix 1 to the Term Sheet in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer by Toronto Community Housing, and that where required, the City Clerk provide a certificate, in registerable form, pursuant to subsection 453.1(9) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Manager to execute and deliver such other notices, consents, authorizations and agreements on behalf of the City a shareholder or Service Manager in order to facilitate the refinancing of the Toronto Community Housing mortgages on the properties described in the Term Sheet in Attachment 1 to the report (June 17, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, including, without limitation, amendments to the Operating Agreement between the City and Toronto Community Housing.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to respond to a direction from Executive Committee that the City Manager, in consultation with Corporate Finance, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and Toronto Community Housing, report on options to restructure/refinance high-interest City loans to Toronto Community Housing (TCH) in order to unlock funding to address Toronto Community Housing's capital repair backlog.

 

This report recommends that Toronto Community Housing Corporation be provided with a new 30-year loan that replaces the existing City loans for 55 properties. As shown in Appendix A, these existing loans have an outstanding balance of approximately $19.4 million and maturity dates that range from 2017 to 2031. The existing interest rates on these loans range from 5.5% to 11% and average about 8%.

 

It is proposed that the City provide the new loan at an interest rate that is equal to the City's current cost of capital for 30-year debentures, which is approximately 4.5%. The new loan would have a total annual repayment amount equal to the total annual repayment amount currently being provided by Toronto Community Housing on the existing loans. As a result of the extended amortization period and the reduced interest rate, the existing annual repayment amounts can now support a new total loan amount of $52.4 million. After repayment of the existing loans, this will allow Toronto Community Housing to apply approximately $33.0 million towards addressing capital needs throughout the entire Toronto Community Housing social housing portfolio.

 

In order to support Toronto Community Housing's repayment of this expanded loan, Toronto Community Housing Corporation has requested a City commitment to extend the existing mortgage subsidy funding being provided by the City to Toronto Community Housing for 47 of the 55 properties (8 properties do not currently receive mortgage subsidies) so that the current annual subsidy amounts are maintained until the end of the new 30-year mortgage amortization term. The extended mortgage subsidy funding has a total nominal value of $40.1 million and a present value of $16.9 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Refinancing of City Loans to Toronto Community Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70796.pdf
Attachment 1 - City/Toronto Community Housing Mortgage Refinancing Proposal (Term Sheet)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70797.pdf
Attachment 2 - Additional City Funding Commitment by Property
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70798.pdf

EX43.12 - Vintner’s Quality Alliance Wines at Toronto Farmers’ Markets

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the item for information.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Strategic and Corporate Policy

Summary

This report provides information on regulation amendments to the provincial Liquor Licence Act to permit the sale and sampling of Vintner’s Quality Alliance (VQA) wines at Ontario farmers’ markets on a two-year pilot program basis.  Under the program, VQA wineries are authorized to sell and serve samples of their product at farmers’ markets across the province, including markets in Toronto. The Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) delivers and regulates the program. Under the regulation, the City of Toronto has the ability to prohibit VQA wine sales at farmers’ market within its boundaries. City Divisions permit or directly organize twenty farmers’ markets in Toronto, and an additional six farmers’ markets are held on property owned by City agencies. Under the new regulations, VQA wines could be available at these farmers’ markets. City staff are closely monitoring the impact of the program on the markets and adjacent neighbourhoods, and will evaluate the program near the completion of the pilot.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Strategic and Corporate Policy on Vintner’s Quality Alliance Wines at Toronto Farmers’ Markets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70881.pdf
(April 11, 2014) Attachment 1 - Correspondence from the Alcohol and Gaming Commission to the City Clerk
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70882.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Attachment 2 - Inventory of Toronto Farmers’ Markets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70883.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Attachment 3 - Toronto Farmers’ Market Network - Guidelines for Product Sampling by Wineries at Farmers’ Markets
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70884.pdf

Speakers

Miroslav Glavic

EX43.13 - Next Phase of Waterfront Revitalization

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications EX43.13.3 to EX43.13.6 have been submitted on this Item

First Item on Tuesday July 8

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to report on the outcome of a waterfront strategic review in the second quarter of 2015.

 

2.         City Council request Waterfront Toronto to adopt a policy similar to the Freedom of Information request under Municipal Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act for all documents and communications in its possession.

 

3.         City Council request Waterfront Toronto to retain the services of an independent Open Meeting Investigator similar to the Meeting Investigator for the City of Toronto. The Waterfront Toronto Open Meeting Investigator will receive requests for investigation into meetings which the requester believes did not comply with its open meeting rules, such investigative report shall be made public.

 

4.         City Council request Waterfront Toronto to adopt a policy similar to the one found in the Toronto Public Service by-law which provides a mechanism for disclosure of wrongdoing and protection for staff who do so, and include provisions for the Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protections.

 

5.         City Council request the City Manager to report back through the Executive Committee on the details and timing of implementation of these initiatives in the first quarter of 2015.

 

6.         City Council request the City Manager to report in the first quarter of 2015 on terms of reference for the re-establishment of the Toronto Waterfront Reference group.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Summary

The purpose of this report is to propose a strategic review related to the next phase of waterfront revitalization, the outcome of which will be reported to the Executive Committee in the second quarter of 2015.

 

The need for a strategic review is triggered by the submission of Waterfront Toronto's Strategic Business Plan to the City, efforts to determine a funding scheme for East Bayfront transit and emerging Port Lands Acceleration Initiative work.  The recent provincial and upcoming federal elections also provide a timely opportunity for re-engagement of the government partners and the re-assessment of waterfront priorities.

 

Since Waterfront Toronto was established in 2003, almost $1.5 billion of government funding has been invested in waterfront revitalization.  City funding to the project and capital budget expenditures, along with Waterfront Toronto land and development revenues, will largely complete the capital projects that are underway through to 2017.  However, waterfront revitalization is at the half way point and progress could stall without the continued participation of the three orders of government. 

 

While much work has been completed, a number of important city building projects remain as yet unrealized.  These include waterfront transit, notably the extension of transit to East Bayfront and eastern points, as well as flood protection and servicing in the Port Lands. Both of these initiatives are included in the City's recent development charge renewal for partial funding.  In addition, new projects of significance are emerging.  For example, Great Gulf Corporation's proposed employment hub at 21 Don Roadway beside the Don River and discussion of a subway relief line should be considered as the City plans for the next decade of its waterfront delivery.

 

The proposed strategic review will use the experience of waterfront revitalization since 2000, results of discussions with federal and provincial officials, and consultation with key stakeholders including the public, to formulate a platform for the future.  A set of agreed upon principles, as articulated in this report, will guide the review, the outcome of which will be reported to Council early in its next term.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on Next Phase of Waterfront Revitalization
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70846.pdf
(December 18, 2013) Attachment 1 - Waterfront Toronto's Strategic Business Plan, Waterfront 2.0
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70847.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Attachment 2 - Summary Report of Waterfront Toronto Economic Impact Analysis (April 2001 - March 2013)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70848.pdf

Speakers

Cynthia Wilkey, West Don Lands Committee
Jane Robinson, Gooderham & Worts Neighbourhood Association
Julie Beddoes
John Wilson
Councillor Paula Fletcher
Councillor Pam McConnell
Councillor Doug Ford
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Janet Davis

Communications (Committee)

(July 2, 2014) Letter from Avi Tesciuba, Hines (EX.New.EX43.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-48454.pdf
(June 30, 2014) E-mail from Alan Vihant, Great Gulf Group of Companies (EX.New.EX43.13.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-48450.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 4, 2014) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.EX43.13.3)
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Mark Wilson, Chair, Waterfront Toronto (CC.New.EX43.13.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48599.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Neil Pattison, Director of Development, The Daniels Corporation (CC.New.EX43.13.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48600.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Jason Lester, Chief Executive Officer, Dundee Kilmer Developments L.P. (CC.New.EX43.13.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48621.pdf

EX43.14 - Pan/Parapan American Games Capital Projects Update

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the 2014 Approved Capital Budget for Pan Am Games to increase the total project cost for the BMX Track capital sub-project by $2.413 million from $1.547 million to $3.96 million, funded by redirecting up to $1.054 million in City debt funding from the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre capital sub-project, conditional on the remaining required share of up to $1.359 million being committed by the Government of Canada in order to maintain the 44 percent (City of Toronto) / 56 percent (Government of Canada) cost sharing ratio.

 

2.         City Council amend the 2014 Approved Capital Budget for Pan Am Games to add a new capital sub-project entitled BMX Track – [Concrete Reinforcement] with the total project cost of up to $4.41 million, funded by redirecting up to $0.450 million in unspent City debt funding from the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre capital sub-project, in order to increase facility security, reduce liability risk and ensure long-term durability of the facility.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A

Summary

This report provides an update on the status of the City’s ten 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games (“2015 Games”) capital projects, and advises Council that there is a budget shortfall for the Pan Am Bicycle Motocross Track construction project at Centennial Park ("BMX Track Project").  Authority is sought to pay for the City’s 44 percent share of the shortfall by redirecting $1.260 million in City debt funding from Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre (“TPASC”) capital sub-project which is projected to be almost $10 million under budget.

 

The BMX Track Project was originally estimated by TO2015 at $1.547 million.  The City agreed to include the project in its 2015 Games capital projects, with the City contributing $0.678 million or 44 percent  of total project costs.   In May 2014, the Request for Proposals (RFP) process for this project closed and the preferred, low-cost, proponent was identified. Based on the preferred proponent’s submission, the total cost for the BMX Track Project cost is now anticipated to be $4.410 million.  Should this project proceed, the City's contribution would be $1.940 million or $1.262 million more than the City’s current budgeted contribution of $0.678 million. In addition, the Government of Canada's contribution would be required to increase from $0.866 million to $2.469 million.

 

In 2011, City Council approved a capital project called Pan Am Aquatic Centre/Canadian Sport Institute for Ontario now named the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre (“TPASC”).  The approved TPASC project cost was $248.93 million, $54.765 million of which represented the City's contribution.  As a result of lower tenders, the guaranteed price of the Infrastructure Ontario (“IO”) managed TPASC contract is $205 million and the City’s contribution has been reduced to $45.10 million, resulting in budget savings of $9.67 million (the “TPASC Budget Savings”).  In July 2013, Council approved the reallocation of $2.42 million of the Toronto Pan Am Sports Centre Budget Savings to fund the West Channel, a new Pan Am Games project.  Council’s authority is now sought to redirect up to $1.262 million of the remaining TPASC Budget Savings to fund the additional BMX Track Project costs.

 

This matter is urgent in nature because, in order to complete the BMX Track venue in time for adequate testing prior to the 2015 Games, project construction must commence before the end of July 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A on Pan/Parapan American Games Capital Projects Update
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70768.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Doug Ford

Communications (Committee)

(June 26, 2014) E-mail from Romana Marconi (EX.Supp.EX43.14.1)

EX43.15 - Update on the 2015 Pan American / Parapan American Games Host City Showcase Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications EX43.15.1 and EX43.15.2 have been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture to increase the total project cost for the Prince Edward Viaduct Illumination (Phase 1) capital sub-project (i.e. lighting of the five piers and subway undercarriage) by $1.000 million from $1.800 million to $2.800 million, funded from the Public Realm Reserve Fund (XR1410).

 

2.         City Council delegate authority to the City Manager to accept on the City’s behalf any donations or contributions related to the Prince Edward Viaduct Illumination project, and enter into any related agreements provided that such agreements are in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor and compliant with applicable City policies, at any time between August 2014 and January 2015.

 

3.         City Council approve a temporary exemption from by-law 743-16(10) to support a Host City Street Banner campaign of up to 150 days prior to and during the TORONTO 2015 Games.

 

4.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to report back to the August 20, 2014 meeting of the Executive Committee on the distribution of the $1.76 million Pan Am Community Projects initiative, with due regard to any advice offered by the Mayor's Pan Am Reference Group or other community perspectives.

 

5.           City Council approve the award categories and criteria for the Toronto Sports Hall of Honour outlined in Appendix B to the report (June 17, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, and authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to form a selection panel of no less than seven (7) and no more than thirteen (13) members, reflecting the City’s diversity objectives and comprised of representatives from the organizations identified in Appendix B.

 

6.         City Council delegate authority to the City Manager to enter into any agreements - whether involving a partnership, donation, grant, contract service provision or otherwise, and including with respect to the receipt, transfer or expenditure of funds - in order to support the timely implementation of approved and budgeted Host City Showcase Program initiatives, provided that such agreements are in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A

Summary

In July 2013 City Council endorsed an investment of up to $20 million in a 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games Host City Showcase Program (“Showcase Program”) to enhance the experience of the TORONTO 2015 Games for participants and residents, and to advance the City's economic development and tourism, sport development and healthy living, and resident engagement and cultural celebration goals.

 

Final approval and funding for the Showcase Program– including $2.500 million for a cultural celebration; $2.700 million to support Games related marketing, communication and enhanced visitor services activities; and $13.898 million for 28 innovative projects – was confirmed through Council’s adoption of the 2014 Operating and Capital Budgets.

 

This report supports and advises on the implementation of certain Showcase Program initiatives by (i) seeking additional funding of $1.000 million for the first phase of the Prince Edward Viaduct Illumination project; (ii) requesting authority to proceed with a 150 day Host City Street Banner campaign; (iii) recommending that the $1.76 million earmarked for the Pan Am Community Projects initiative be divided among three complementary grant streams; (iv) describing features of the Toronto Sports Hall of Honour initiative; and (v) reporting on, respectively, efforts by City officials to secure sponsorships to offset Showcase Program costs and to ensure that Games related cultural activities are equitably distributed across Toronto.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B, from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A on Update on the 2015 Pan American / Parapan American Games Host City Showcase Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70821.pdf

Speakers

Hamish Wilson

Communications (City Council)

(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.EX43.15.1)
(July 4, 2014) E-mail from Hamish Wilson (CC.Supp.EX43.15.2)

EX43.16 - Proposed Re-Naming of Union Station

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
First Item after Member Motions on Wednesday, July 9.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that Union Station not be re-named to Sir John A. Macdonald Station.

 

2.         City Council authorize, upon completion of the Union Station revitalization, that the plaza that is being redeveloped in front of Union Station be formally named after Sir John A. Macdonald.

 

3.         City Council authorize, upon addressing outstanding operational issues, the installation of a plaque on Union Station's parapet wall to commemorate the naming of the new Sir John A. Macdonald Plaza.

 

4.         City Council direct that in accordance with the City's Honourific and Street Naming Policy, the purchase and installation of the Sir John A. Macdonald plaque be contingent upon securing the necessary funding from external parties.

 

5.         City Council direct the City Manager to establish a Sir John A. MacDonald Working Group, composed of Councillors, staff, and local businesses to properly recognize the Sir John A. Macdonald Plaza.

 

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships

Summary

Executive Committee requested, at its February 23, 2014 meeting, that staff consult with the general public and relevant stakeholders regarding the feasibility of renaming Union Station after Sir  John A. Macdonald, one of the "Fathers of Confederation". The purpose of this report is to recommend that Union Station not be renamed in honour of Canada's first Prime Minister for the following reasons:

 

-           The Station's name and edifice are iconic and both are considered to be core components of the City's history and heritage;

 

-           The general public and key stakeholders do not support the idea;

 

-           Changing the name would have substantive operational impacts;

 

-           Such a renaming would not be in line with the City's Honourific and Street Naming Policy.

 

In lieu of Union Station, it is recommended that the City mark the bicentennial of our first Prime Minister's birth by formally naming, upon completion of the Union Station revitalization and other considerations, the new plaza being developed at the Station's entrance after Sir John A. Macdonald.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships on Proposed Re-Naming of Union Station
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70795.pdf

Speakers

Miroslav Glavic
Councillor Pam McConnell

Communications (Committee)

(June 14, 2014) E-mail from Karen Sun, Foundation to Commemorate the Chinese Railroad Workers in Canada (EX.Main.EX43.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-48347.pdf

EX43.17 - 951-971 Bay Street and 501-521 Yonge Street - Applying the Parks and Recreation Component of the Development Charges to an Off-site Parkland Dedication

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve a development charge credit for the design and construction of the Above Base Park Improvements by the owners of 951-971 Bay Street and 501-521 Yonge Street at 5-25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street. The development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owners of installing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development. The development charge credits will only be applicable if the Wellesley Street site is approved, and if the owners agree to apply the credits.

 

2.         City Council authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the owners of 951-957 Bay Street and 501-521 Yonge Street to accept a Letter of Credit for the payment of the Parks and Recreation component of Development Charges payable.

 

3.         City Council authorize staff to enter into an agreement with the owners of 951-957 Bay Sreet and 501-521 Yonge Street to accept a Letter of Credit to secure the parkland dedication requirements in respect of the site.

Origin

(June 16, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

City Planning is scheduling a Final Report for a proposed rezoning at 5 to 25 Wellesley Street West and 14 to 26 Breadalbane Street (one site, referred to in this report as the Wellesley Street site) to the August 12, 2014 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council. As part of the development application, the owner has proposed part of the site for parkland to fulfill their parkland dedication requirements. The owner of this site also controls two other sites in the immediate area that have been subject to recent development approvals at 951-971 Bay Street (Bay Street site) and 501-521 Yonge Street (Yonge Street site). The owner is proposing that the parkland dedication requirements for those sites be fulfilled on the Wellesley Street site.

 

The development application on the Bay Street site is on track to obtain its Superstructure Permit in the next few weeks. As the owner has agreed to construct the above base park improvements at the Wellesley Street site, staff are seeking City Council approval to apply a credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development charges to build the above base park improvements and to collect Letters of Credit for the Development Charges and the Parkland Dedication requirement.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 16, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Acting General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation on 951-971 Bay Street and 501-521 Yonge Street - Applying the Parks and Recreation Component of the Development Charges to an Off-site Parkland Dedication
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70737.pdf

EX43.18 - Toward a Policy Framework for Toronto Transit Fare Equity

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EX43.18.6 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, in partnership with the Chief Customer Officer and Deputy Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, the Medical Officer of Health; the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; the City Treasurer; and the Director, Financial Planning to develop a Policy Framework for Toronto Transit Fare Equity for consideration by the end of 2015.

                       

2.         City Council forward the report (June 17, 2014) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Chief Customer Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, to the Federal Ministers of: Employment and Social Development, Health, Transport, and Veterans' Affairs, and the Ontario Ministers of Children and Youth Services, Citizenship and Immigration, Community and Social Services, Economic Development, Trade and Employment; Education, Health and Long-Term Care, Training, Colleges, and Universities, Transportation, and Seniors Affairs, and the President and Chief Executive Officer, Metrolinx.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and the Chief Customer Officer, Toronto Transit Commission

Summary

Equitable access to public transit has two core dimensions: service availability and service affordability.

 

Toronto is preparing for a future that includes expanded and enhanced public transit services. These initiatives will increase equitable access to transit, by making high quality transit available to more Torontonians.

 

In light of transit expansion developments that will improve availability, it is timely for the City of Toronto to prepare a complementary transit plan focused on affordability. A Policy Framework for Toronto Transit Fare Equity is needed so that when new transit services become available, they will also be affordable for lower income riders.

 

Over the past year, several reports have been adopted related to reducing the cost of public transit for low income residents and directing various City staff to review different mechanisms for achieving transit fare affordability. What has been missing to date is an overarching strategic policy framework to guide such analyses and lead to recommendations that are relevant to different City programs and can be jointly implemented. To respond effectively to recent directions, this report recommends the preparation of a formal City-wide policy framework for defining, funding, implementing, and evaluating transit affordability. A formal policy framework will clarify the assumptions, goals, and funding requirements for sustaining transit discounts for low income residents and thereby achieve transit fare equity for all Torontonians.  Key considerations that should inform the design of this policy framework are described in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration and Chief Customer Officer, Toronto Transit Commission on Toward a Policy Framework for Toronto Transit Fare Equity
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70755.pdf

Speakers

Stefanie Hardman, Fair Fare Coalition
Brenda Thompson, Scarborough Anti-Poverty Coalition
Jessica Bell
Linsey Macphee, Toronto Drop In Network
Helen Armstrong, St. Stephens Community House
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(June 30, 2014) E-mail from Lynne Raskin (EX.New.EX43.18.1)
(July 2, 2014) Letter from Cristina Andrade and Marcelina Gonzalez Rodriguez (EX.New.EX43.18.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-48461.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Letter from Jennifer Huang (EX.New.EX43.18.3)
(July 2, 2014) Letter from Jessica Bell, TTCriders (EX.New.EX43.18.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/comm/communicationfile-48466.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Letter from Linsay Macphee, Toronto Drop-in Network (EX.New.EX43.18.5)

Communications (City Council)

(July 2, 2014) Submission from Stefanie Hardman (CC.Supp.EX43.18.6)

EX43.19 - Extending and Continuing City Council-Authorized 2014 Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees and Solid Waste Management Services Rates

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 696 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council extend and continue the Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees set out in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and approved by City Council, and enacted by By-law No. 1698-2013, beyond December 31, 2014 until such time that City Council adopts Toronto Water's 2015 Operating and Capital Budgets and any corresponding changes, which may be necessary to the Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees.

 

2.         City Council extend and continue the Solid Waste Rates set out in Appendix B to the report (June 11, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, and approved by City Council and enacted by By-law136-2014, beyond December 31, 2014 until such time that City Council adopts the 2015 Operating and Capital Budgets for Solid Waste Management Services and any corresponding changes, which may be necessary to the Solid Waste Rates.

 

3.         City Council authorize amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, to provide that all fees and charges approved by City Council and set out in the Appendices to Chapter 441 continue in full force and effect until such time as they are amended or repealed, unless otherwise authorized by City Council and specified in the Municipal Code.

 

4.         City Council authorize the necessary amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 441 – Fees and Charges, and any other necessary Municipal Code Chapters as may be required, to give effect to Recommendations 1, 2 and 3 above.

 

5.         City Council grant authority to the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary Bills required to implement these recommendations, subject to any necessary refinements, including stylistic, format and organization, as may be identified by the City Solicitor, the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the General Manager, Toronto Water and the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Summary

This report seeks Council authority to extend and continue, beyond December 31, 2014, the 2014 Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees (the "Toronto Water Rates") and the 2014 Solid Waste Management Services Rates (the "Solid Waste Rates"), set out in Appendix A and B respectively to this report, previously approved by Council at its meeting on December 16, 17 and 18, 2013, (collectively, the "Rates") until such time as the newly elected Council has considered and approved the 2015 Operating and Capital budgets for Toronto Water and Solid Waste Management Services and any corresponding changes which may be necessary to the Rates.

 

In addition, to streamline efficiencies and address this issue, particularly, for future election years, this report seeks Council authority to make any necessary amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, to provide that all fees and charges approved by Council and set out in the Appendices to Chapter 441 continue in full force and effect until such time as they are amended or repealed, unless otherwise authorized by Council and specified in the Municipal Code.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on Extending and Continuing City Council-Authorized 2014 Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees and Solid Waste Management Services Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70476.pdf
(June 11, 2014) Appendix A - Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates to Extend and Continue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70477.pdf
(June 11, 2014) Appendix B - Solid Waste Rates to Extend and Continue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70478.pdf
(June 11, 2014) Public Notice on Proposed Extension and Continuation of City Council-Authorized 2014 Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates and Service Fees and Solid Waste Management Services Rates into 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70810.pdf
Public Notice Attachment A - Schedule 1, 2 and 3, Water and Wastewater Consumption Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70811.pdf
Public Notice Attachment B - Solid Waste Management Services Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70814.pdf

EX43.20 - Development Charge Credits for the Construction of a Portion of Legion Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize a development charge credit in the amount of $463,035.30 to Empire (Beyond the Sea) Ltd. for the eligible road works related to the reconstruction of Legion Road adjacent to their site located at 2242 and 2246 Lake Shore Boulevard West subject to Empire (Beyond the Sea) Ltd. executing a Release in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(June 13, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council authority to provide development charge credits to Empire (Beyond the Sea) Ltd. ("Empire") related to their construction of the section of Legion Road adjacent to their site located at 2242 and 2246 Lake Shore Boulevard West.  Empire constructed this section of Legion Road in accordance with the vertical profile reflected in the Legion Road Extension Class EA Environmental Study Report (ESR).  As a result, Empire incurred construction costs that they would not have otherwise been responsible for.   On this basis, City staff have concluded that Empire is eligible for a development charge credit (refund) for a portion of their construction costs for the section of Legion Road abutting their site.

 

Funds for the credit are available in the City's Development Charge Reserve Fund.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Development Charge Credits for the Construction of a Portion of Legion Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70743.pdf

EX43.23 - 2014 Levy on Railway Roadways and Rights of Way and on Power Utility Transmission and Distribution Corridors

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 661 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the levy and collection of taxes for the 2014 taxation year on railway roadways and rights of way and on land used as transmission or distribution corridors owned by power utilities, in accordance with subsection 280 (1) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and subsection 257.7 (1) the Education Act.

 

2.         City Council grant authority for the introduction of the necessary bill to give effect thereto.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report seeks Council authority for the introduction of the by-law necessary to levy and collect taxes for the 2014 taxation year on railway roadways and rights of way and on land used as transmission or distribution corridors owned by power utilities.  The levies total approximately $7.2 million in taxation revenue, of which the municipal share is $6.6 million and the provincial education share is $0.6 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on 2014 Levy on Railway Roadways and Rights of Way and on Power Utility Transmission and Distribution Corridors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70505.pdf

EX43.24 - 2014 Heads and Beds Levy on Institutions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 660 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the levy and collection of amounts for the 2014 taxation year on hospitals, colleges and universities and correctional facilities as authorized by Section 285 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

2.         City Council direct that the maximum prescribed amount of $75 be applied per provincially rated hospital bed, full time student, or resident place as prescribed by Ontario Regulation 121/07.

 

3.         City Council grant authority for the introduction of the necessary bill in Council to levy amounts for the 2014 taxation year on hospitals, colleges and universities and correctional facilities.

 

4.         City Council again forward the 2013 report on the Heads and Beds Levy on Institutions to the Premier of Ontario, Minister of Finance and request that the $75.00 levy be increased.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee directed the Treasurer to report directly to City Council at its scheduled meeting of July 8 and 9, 2014 on the final 2014 “Heads and Beds” levy should the final 2014 capacity figures for Colleges be received from the Province prior to this Council meeting.

 

Origin

(June 12, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report requests Council authority to adopt a by-law to levy amounts for the 2014 taxation year for public hospitals, universities and colleges, and correctional facilities (the “institutions”), estimated at approximately $16.7 million (annual “Heads and Beds” levy).

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Treasurer on 2014 Heads and Beds Levy on Institutions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70582.pdf

EX43.25 - Property Taxes - 2015 Interim Levy By-Law

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize that the 2015 interim levy for all property classes be based on 50 percent of the total 2014 taxes billed for each property, adjusted, as necessary, to reflect any additional taxes added to the previous year's taxes as a result of assessment added to the tax roll.

 

2.         City Council authorize that the interim levy apply to assessments added to the tax roll for 2014 that were not on the assessment roll when the by-law was passed.

 

3.         City Council authorize that:

 

a.         the interim bill payment due dates for property tax accounts paid on the eleven (11) instalment pre-authorized tax payment plan be: February 17, March 16, April 15, May 15, and June 15, 2015;

 

b.         the interim bill payment due date for the two (2) instalment pre-authorized tax payment plan be March 2, 2015; and

 

c.         the interim bill payment due dates for all other property tax accounts on the regular instalment option or on the six (6) instalment pre-authorized tax payment plan be: March 2, April 1, and May 1, 2015.

 

4.         City Council authorize:

 

a.         the collection of interim taxes;

 

b.         imposing a penalty charge for non-payment of interim taxes at a rate of 1.25 percent of taxes due and unpaid and the addition of such charges on the first day of default; and

  

c.         imposing an interest charge on all outstanding taxes accruing from the first day of default at a rate of 1.25 per cent per month.

 

5.         City Council grant authority to introduce the necessary bill in Council on December 2 and 3, 2014, providing for the levying and collection of the 2015 interim taxes prior to the adoption of the estimates for 2015, which by-law, when enacted, will be effective as of January 1, 2015.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report recommends the adoption of the 2015 interim levy and requests authority to introduce the necessary by-law at the inaugural meeting of Council on December 2 and 3, 2014.  The 2015 interim levy will raise approximately $1.89 billion for City purposes, and will provide for the cash requirements of the City until such time as the 2015 Operating Budget and 2015 final property tax levy are approved by Council.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Property Taxes: 2015 Interim Levy By-Law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70498.pdf

EX43.26 - Swansea Town Hall Community Centre Request for Cash Flow Advance

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.           City Council approve a cash advance of $0.027 million to the Swansea Town Hall Community Centre to compensate for the loss in rental revenue arising from the closure of the Swansea Nursery School facility in order to meet its operating obligations, and that the source to fund the final net deficit for Swansea Town Hall Community Centre be reported as part of the final 2014 year-end Operating Budget Variance report.

Origin

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend a $0.027 million cash advance to the Swansea Town Hall Community Centre. As a result of the implementation of full day kindergarten in September 2014, the Swansea Nursery School (a licensed not-for-profit daycare) advised Swansea Town Hall Community Centre on April 30, 2014 of its decision to partially close its operations beginning in May 2014, with full closure expected as of June 30, 2014. This will result in a loss of rental revenue for the Community Centre for the latter half of 2014. Swansea Town Hall Community Centre is requesting a cash advance of $0.027 million to cover operating expenses for the six-month period as a result of the loss in rental revenue.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Swansea Town Hall Community Centre Request for Cash Flow Advance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70911.htm
(June 4, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Swansea Town Hall Community Centre Request for Cash Flow Advance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70909.pdf
(April 30, 2014) Appendix 1- Notice of Closure from Swansea Nursery School
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70910.pdf

EX43.27 - Increase Reserve Fund Draw for Exhibition Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee forwards the item to City Council without recommendation.

Origin

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request that Council approve an increase in the draw from the Exhibition Place Conference Centre Reserve Fund (CCRF) of $781,239, as the operating requirement to fund the construction loan payments for the Allstream Centre was higher than originally estimated in the 2013 Approved Operating Budget.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Increase Reserve Fund Draw for Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70891.htm
(June 5, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Increase Reserve Fund Draw for Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70913.pdf

EX43.28 - Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer have submitted a memo on this item (EX43.28c)

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the item for information.

Origin

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto's Operating Variance for the year ended December 31, 2013 and allocation of the 2013 year-end surplus.

 

The preliminary 2013 year-end operating position for Tax Supported Operations resulted in a net favourable variance of $168.084 million available for distribution after Council directions and legislative requirements are met.  Consistent with City Council's approved Surplus Management Policy, at least 75 percent of the surplus or $126.063 million of the 2013 final year-end operating results will be allocated to the Capital Financing Reserve and $42.021 million will be allocated to underfunded liabilities and/or reserve funds.  The 2013 Tax Supported Operating surplus represents only about 1.8 percent of the approved gross City Budget.

 

For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2013, Tax Supported Operations are summarized in Table 1 below.

 

(See Table 1 of the Report dated June 4, 2014 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

Under-spending was driven largely by savings from:

           Lower than budgeted Toronto Transit Commission Conventional Services' expenditures for various items such as depreciation on capital assets, diesel fuel, certain healthcare benefits, maintenance costs for buses and streetcars and vacancies;

           Lower than planned Tax Deficiencies (i.e. write-offs from assessment appeals); and,

           A reduction in caseload for Toronto Employment and Social Services.

 

In addition, higher than budgeted revenue realized from permit applications for Toronto Building, Payment in Lieu of Taxes and the Municipal Land Transfer Tax contributed to the favourable net variance.

 

One program area reported a significant unfavourable variances in 2013.  Court Services ended 2013 with a deficit of about $15.5 million net due to lower ticket issuance and resulting fine revenues.

 

Rate Supported Programs, excluding the Toronto Parking Authority, reported a year-end net favourable variance of $62.956 million which will be returned to their respective program reserve funds.  The Toronto Parking Authority reported an unfavourable variance of $3.187 million net.

 

Table 2 below summarizes Rate Supported Program net variances:

 

(See Table 2 of the Report dated June 4, 2014 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

The year-end favourable net variance of $59.769 million was driven by Toronto Water's net under-spending of $52.437 million, primarily due to:

 

           Over-achieved revenues of $31.829 million from a less than expected decline in residential water consumption than originally forecasted;

           Higher than expected recoveries for new water and wastewater service connections; and,

           Lower gross expenditures of $20.608 million below expectations primarily due to under-spending in salaries and benefits for vacant positions.

 

Table 3 below summarizes the vacancy rate for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013. For year-end, the City recorded a vacancy rate of 2.6 percent after approved gapping which forms part of 2013 Budget adopted by Council.

 

(See Table 3 of the Report dated June 4, 2014 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70892.htm
(June 4, 2014) Report and Appendices A to E from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Operating Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70915.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 8, 2014) Memo from the City Manager and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Toronto Transit Commission Request to Retain Operating Surplus (EX43.28c)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71307.pdf

28a - Request from the Toronto Transit Commission to Retain Its 2013 Operating Surplus

Origin
(June 2, 2014) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission
Summary

In recommending approval of its Draft Consolidated Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 to the City's Audit Committee, the Toronto Transit Commission Board of Directors also made recommendations with respect to retaining its 2013 $47.7 million operating surplus.

 

Preliminary year-end financial statements indicated a 2013 year-end subsidy of $7.3 million. A number of regular year-end accounting adjustments largely based on actuarial estimates were made in finalizing this number, which is now $47.7 million. In 2013 the TTC spent less than what had been estimated in several areas, such as long-term liabilities for workplace safety, insurance benefits, accident claims payouts, retroactive pay, overhead costs to capital projects and administrative fees.

 

City of Toronto policy requires all surplus to go back to the City which essentially reduces the TTC’s subsidy for that year. This is a City of Toronto policy and applies to all agencies, boards and commissions of the City

 

The surplus cannot be reallocated to the TTC operating budget for one-time service increases because any service increase would need to be maintained year-over-year.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 2, 2014) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, Toronto Transit Commission, forwarding Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 and recommendations regarding 2013 surplus
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70723.pdf

28b - Multi-Year Impact of the Toronto Transit Commission's Request to Retain 2013 Operating Surplus

Origin
(June 16, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
Summary

The purpose of this report is to identify the multi-year financial impact on both the TTC's Operating Budget and 10-Year Capital Plan, arising from the Toronto Transit Commission's (TTC) request from their meeting of May 28, 2014 that Council approve that the TTC retain $47.7 million in 2013 operating surplus for the purpose of avoiding a fare increase for 2015.

 

This report will also clarify the use of City-wide operating surplus, with the City's Surplus Management Policy stating that at least 75 percent of the City-wide surplus is to be allocated the Capital Financing Reserve. Given a 2013 net favourable variance of $168.1 million, 75 percent or $126.1 million will be directed to the Capital Financing Reserve.  This reserve predominately funds TTC capital projects as part of the Capital Financing Strategy, with $252 million budgeted to fund TTC capital projects in 2014 alone.

 

In addition, it is proposed that $10.8 million of the 2013 surplus is to be used to fund TTC accident claim liabilities.

 

Accordingly, more than the entire 2013 TTC surplus of $47.7 million is already being re-invested back into the TTC. 

Background Information (Committee)
(June 16, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Multi-Year Impact of the Toronto Transit Commission's Request to Retain 2013 Operating Surplus
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70722.pdf

EX43.29 - Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve in-year budget adjustments to the Toronto Water's 2013 Approved Capital Budget and Plan detailed in Appendix 2 to the report (June 4, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer with no incremental impact on debt funding

 

2.         City Council approve additional carry forward funding of $0.046 million in unspent capital funding from 2013 for Children Services as detailed in Appendix 3 to the report (June 4, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in order to continue work on previously approved capital project, and that the 2014 Approved Capital Budget be adjusted accordingly with no incremental impact on debt.

 

3.         City Council receive for information Appendix 4 to the report (June 4, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer which lists 67 capital projects/sub-projects that have been completed and are to be closed, having a total project budget saving of $35.354 million, including savings of $31.660 million in debt funding.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide Council with the City of Toronto Capital Variance for the year-ended December 31, 2013, to seek Council’s approval for in-year budget and 2013 carry forward funding adjustments that have no incremental impact on debt.

 

Capital expenditures for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 totalled $2.386 billion or 57.9 percent of the 2013 Approved Capital Budget of $4.125 billion (see Table 1).  This spending pattern is consistent with prior years.  As detailed by City Program and Agency in Appendix 1, it is noted that 14 of 33 City Programs and Agencies spent in excess of 60 percent of their respective 2013 Approved Capital Budget.

 

For the twelve-months period ended December 31, 2013, Tax Supported Programs and Agencies reported capital expenditures of $1.837 billion representing 55.7 percent of their collective 2013 Approved Capital Budget of $3.298 billion; Rate Supported Programs reported capital expenditures of $548.752 million, representing 66.3 percent of their collective 2013 Approved Capital Budget of $827.125 million.

 

(See Table 1 of the Report dated June 4, 2014 from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer)

 

The rate of spending in 2013  was driven largely by difficulty in finding and securing suitable sites for constructions in accordance with initially planned timeframes; delays in securing funds from cost-sharing partners; longer than planned timelines to obtain necessary approvals or required permits; extensive community consultations; delays in tendering contracts; unanticipated delays in construction start-up; and resources constraints.  Unspent funds for projects that have not been completed have been carried forward to 2014 on an as needed basis, in accordance with the City's Carry Forward Policy. 

 

In addition, several projects were completed under-budget. Through this report staff recommends closing 67 projects which have came in under budget by $35.354 million.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70893.htm
(June 4, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70921.pdf
Appendix 1 - 2013 Consolidated Capital Variance Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70919.pdf
Appendix 2 - In-Year adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70920.pdf
Appendix 3 - 2013 Carry Forwards Funding Adjustments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70917.pdf
Appendix 4 - Closed Capital Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70922.pdf
Appendix 5 - Capital Variance Explanation - Programs/Agencies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70918.pdf
Appendix 5 - REVISED Capital Variance Explanation - Programs/Agencies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-71021.pdf

EX43.30 - Amendments to Contract 47017290, 47017308, 47017297 and 47017307 for Repairs of Water and Sewer Connections, Mains and Appurtenances in various Districts

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the 2014 Capital Budget and 2015-2023 Capital Plan for Toronto Water by accelerating the 2015 approved cash flow for All District Water Service Replacement Project (CPW544-03) and Sewer Rehabilitation Project (CPW465-06)  in the amount of $1,550,000.00 and $1,850,000.00 respectively, from 2015 to 2014, as outlined in Table 2 in the report (May 28, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, with no budget impact.

 

2.         City Council amend the 2014 Operating Budget for Toronto Water by reallocating the 2014 approved funding for contribution to Toronto Water's Capital Financing Reserve Funds in the total amount of $3,621,440.00 to the 2014 approved funding for contracted services as outlined in Table 2 in the report (May 28, 2014) from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, with a $0 net impact on the 2014 Approved Operating Budget.

 

3.         City Council reverse the 2014 Operating Budget amendment in Recommendation 2 above, as part of the 2015 Operating Budget Process.

 

4.         City Council direct the General Manager, Toronto Water, include for consideration with the 2015 Operating and Capital Budget Process, any additional funding required in 2015 and future years resulting from the impact of the extreme cold weather during the 2014 winter.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, at its meeting of June 18, 2014:

 

1.         Amended Contract 47017290 for Repairs of Water and Sewer Connections, Mains and Appurtenances Toronto East York District, Tender 254-2012, with OJCR Construction Ltd., by an additional amount of $2,500,000.00 net of all taxes ($2,544,000.00 net of HST recoveries) revising the current value from $11,786,948.43 to $14,286,948.43 net of all taxes ($14,538,398.72 net of HST recoveries), subject to City Council approval of Recommendations 1 and 2 from the Executive Committee.

 

2.         Amended Contract 47017308 for Repairs of Water and Sewer Connections, Mains and Appurtenances Etobicoke York District, Tender 255-2012, with OJCR Construction Ltd., by an additional amount of $2,800,000.00 net of all taxes ($2,849,280.00 net of HST recoveries) revising the current value from $8,696,692.66 to $11,496,692.66 net of all taxes ($11,699,034.45 net of HST recoveries), subject to City Council approval of Recommendations 1 and 2 from the Executive Committee.

 

3.         Amended Contract 47017297 for Repairs of Water and Sewer Connections, Mains and Appurtenances NorthYork District, Tender 256-2012, with Finch Paving (1993) Ltd., by an additional amount of $900,000.00 net of all taxes ($915,840.00 net of HST recoveries) revising the current value from $7,083,696.28 to $7, 983,696.28 net of all taxes ($8,124,209.34 net of HST recoveries), subject to City Council approval of Recommendations 1 and 2 from the Executive Committee.

 

4.         Amended Contract 47017307 for Repairs of Water and Sewer Connections, Mains and Appurtenances Scarborough District, Tender 257-2012, with 614128 Ontario Ltd. o/a Trisan Construction, by an additional amount of $700,000.00 net of all taxes ($712,320.00 net of HST recoveries) revising the current value from $5,065,946.02 to $5,765,946.02 net of all taxes ($5,867,426.67 net of HST recoveries), subject to City Council approval of Recommendations 1 and 2 from the Executive Committee.

Origin

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the impact of the extreme cold weather during the 2014 Winter on Toronto Water Operations current contracts, and to seek authority to amend Contracts 47017290, 47017308, 47017297 and 47017307 for Repairs of Water and Sewer Connections, Mains and Appurtenances in various Districts to ensure business continuity to the end of 2014, as well as to seek authority to amend the approved 2014-2023 Capital Budget and Plan and 2014 Operating Budget for Toronto Water in order to allocate appropriate funding for requested contract amendments. It also reports on the cost impact of the volume increase to permanent restoration work to be carried out by Transportation Services in 2015/16.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2014) Letter from the Budget Committee on Amendments to Contract 47017290, 47017308, 47017297 and 47017307 for Repairs of Water and Sewer Connections, Mains and Appurtenances in various Districts
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70894.htm
(May 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70923.pdf
Appendix 1 - Funding Requirements by Contract
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70924.pdf

EX43.31 - Records Retention By-law Amendment - The Board of Governors of Exhibition Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 692 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve of a By-law substantially as set out in Appendix A and the records retention schedule  for the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place set out in Appendix B to the report (May 26, 2014) from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place.

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve a by-law and records retention schedule for Exhibition Place.

 

Under Section 201, City of Toronto Act, 2006, a record of the City or of its Local Boards, other than a copy of the original record, may only be destroyed if the retention period for the record has expired, except as otherwise provided. In 2006 and 2008, the City of Toronto approved by-laws which established a retention schedule for Exhibition Place. When these by-laws were approved there was an understanding that the schedule did not address all existing records series and that subsequent by-law amendments would capture new record series. This report requests approval for a third, routine amendment to the Board’s records retention by-law, Municipal Code c. 219, Records, Corporate (Local Boards).

 

These amendments revise the existing records retention schedule by adding new classes of records. The appendices containing the draft by-law amendment and the new records retention schedule were prepared by Records and Archives staff and have been reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Secretary and Chief Financial Officer of Exhibition Place. They have also been reviewed by City Legal, and the City’s internal and external auditors.  All concur that the retention schedules affected by this report are appropriate and in compliance with applicable standards and legislation.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 26, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place on Records Retention By-law Amendment - The Board of Governors of Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70319.pdf
(May 26, 2014) Appendix B - New record retention schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70320.pdf

EX43.32 - Toronto Police Service - Renewal of the Community Policing Partnership Program Grant Agreement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City of Toronto to renew the Community Policing Partnership (CPP) Agreement with the Province and the Toronto Police Services Board, on terms and conditions substantially similar to those contained in the previous CPP Grant Program Agreement with the Province, subject to approval as to form by the City Solicitor.

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request the Executive Committee to submit a recommendation to City Council to authorize the City of Toronto to renew the Community Policing Partnership (CPP) Program Agreement between the Province of Ontario, the City of Toronto, and the Toronto Police Services Board for a further two-year period – April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2016.  This Agreement was received on April 30, 2014 and replaces the current agreement, which expired on March 31, 2014.

 

Under the Community Policing Partnership Program, the Toronto Police Service (Service) receives grant funding of up to $7.53 million annually to cover a portion ($30,000 per officer) of the salaries and benefits of up to 251 officers.  Although the program is on-going, a formal agreement is entered into every two years.  Revenue of $7.53 million is built into the Service budget each year for the Community Policing Partnership grant program.  In order to maximize the amount of funding received under this grant, the Service must maintain its uniform staffing levels at a predetermined benchmark of at least 5,180 officers.  Uniform staffing levels have been maintained above this benchmark every year since the inception of the Community Policing Partnership Program in 1998 and the current approved authorized uniform strength is 5,505. 

Background Information (Committee)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Toronto Police Service - Renewal of the Community Policing Partnership Program Grant Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70322.pdf

Speakers

Miguel Avila

EX43.33 - Toronto Police Service - Renewal of the Safer Communities - 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Grant Agreement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the renewal of the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Agreement with the Province and the Toronto Police Services Board, on terms and conditions substantially similar to those contained in the previous Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Agreement with the Province, subject to approval as to form by the City Solicitor.

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request the City’s Executive Committee to submit a recommendation to Toronto City Council to authorize the City of Toronto to renew the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Agreement between the Province of Ontario, the City of Toronto and the Toronto Police Services Board for a further two-year period – April 1, 2014 to March 31, 2016.  This Agreement was received on April 30, 2014 and replaces the current agreement, which expired on March 31, 2014.

 

Under the Safer Communities – 1,000 Officers Partnership Program, the Toronto Police Service (Service) receives grant funding of up to $8.75 million annually to cover a portion ($35,000 per officer) of the salaries and benefits of up to 250 officers.  Although the program is on-going, a formal agreement is entered into every two years.  Revenue is built into the Service budget each year for this grant program.  In order to maximize the amount of funding received under this grant, the Service must maintain its uniform staffing levels at a predetermined benchmark of at least 5,510 officers.  With the recent approval of the civilianization of 99 uniform positions, the revised, approved uniform establishment for the Service is 5,505 officers.  Due to this change, the Province has approved the use of premium pay up to a maximum of $175,000 to make up for any potential shortfall in the number of positions to achieve full funding. With this change, the Service would meet the requirements to obtain full funding under the grant.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board on Toronto Police Service - Renewal of the Safer Communities - 1,000 Officers Partnership Program Grant Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70323.pdf

Speakers

Miguel Avila

EX43.34 - Toronto School Boards Task Force Recommendations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Deputy Mayor and the Chair of the Toronto School Boards Task Force to meet as soon as possible with the Ontario Minister of Education to discuss City of Toronto concerns regarding Regulation 444/98 and how to better reflect school properties as community assets by providing school boards with greater financial flexibility.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee forwarded the report (May 27, 2014) from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to the City Manager with the request that he consider including the City School Boards Advisory Committee as a recommended Advisory Committee in the new term of Council.

Origin

(June 4, 2014) Letter from the Toronto School Boards Task Force

Summary

In July 2013, City Council established the City of Toronto – Toronto School Boards Task Force as an advisory committee reporting to Council through the Executive Committee. It was

tasked with providing advice to the next term of Council as to the best means to ensure ongoing collaboration between the City and the School Boards.

 

This report provides a consultation summary from Task Force members and their resulting advice for how the City and the School Boards can best collaborate and the key priorities for

such collaboration. The Task Force proposes that the next Term of Council establish a City-School Boards Advisory Committee. City staff will report at the beginning of the next term of

City Council with recommendations on the establishment of Council advisory bodies and working committees.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 4, 2014) Decision Letter from the Toronto School Boards Task Force on Toronto School Boards Task Force Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70800.pdf
(May 27, 2014) Report and Appendices from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance & Administration on Toronto School Boards Task Force Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70801.pdf
(May 13, 2014) Report from the City Council on Request to explore new partnerships through revision of Ontario Regulation 444/98
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70802.pdf
(May 28, 2014) Letter frrom Councillor Crawford on School Zone Safety Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70803.pdf

EX43.35 - Hydro Corridor Lease Agreements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.         Subject to funding being approved as part of the 2015 Budget Process, City Council request the Director, Real Estate Services to negotiate a licence lease agreement with Hydro One (Ontario Realty Corporation) as an initial measure to transform the remaining Hydro Corridor lands known as Parcels 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9, which have already been identified by Parks, Forestry and Recreation for leasing, located north of Dupont Street and the CP Railway and running from Earlscourt Park to Ossington Avenue, into parkland with recreational amenities that are compatible with the land conditions.

Origin

(June 16, 2014) Letter from City Council

Summary

The west-end hydro corridor has the potential to become an iconic landscape in the City of Toronto, as it can provide a continuous green space for local residents. These subject lands are located north of Dupont Street and the CP Railway, and run from Earlscourt Park to the Annex.  Currently, this corridor provides much needed spatial relief to an area that is compact and densely built.  It also serves a community that is one of the most park-deprived neighbourhoods in the City of Toronto.  However, only pockets of these subject lands are leased by the City, leaving behind fragmented open spaces with large areas of abandoned landscapes.  This includes: the Wiltshire Avenue Corridor, located between Davenport Road and St. Clair Avenue West; the Geary Avenue Lands, located east of Dovercourt Road to Geary Parkette; and the Geary Avenue Lands, located west of Dovercourt Road.  These open landscapes have a tremendous potential to be re-used as a linear park. It can provide the community with much needed amenities that will enhance the City's public realm, while providing residents with a safe and accessible place to enjoy the outdoors.

 

This subject corridor is owned by the Ontario Realty Corporation with Hydro One as the primary user.  The Province has a policy for secondary uses of hydro corridors in place (the Provincial Secondary Land Use Program) and the City already has long-term licences for eight portions of the hydro corridor that are City parks.  These parks are well used by the community and include sports fields, splash pads, allotment gardens and playgrounds. However, by not leasing the entire corridor, many of these open spaces have been abandoned and left in poor conditions.  It also deprives the local community of a continuous physical connection for pedestrians and cyclists.

 

Given the community's strong support towards the revitalization of these lands, Workshop Architecture, an architectural firm located in Ward 17 Davenport, recently organized an international design competition - Green Line Ideas Competition.  This competition attracted many bold visions and proposals from architects, landscape architects, planners, artists and community members that contributed to an overall vision for the public use of this subject hydro corridor. Seventy-seven proposals were submitted to this competition from around the world, all of which clearly elaborated the need to revitalize and reclaim these lands for public use as a measure to enhance the City's public realm.

 

Similar to Toronto's Kay Gardner Beltline Park and New York City's High Line, infrastructure and its respective open spaces must be re-evaluated for future and innovative uses. It is therefore imperative that the City take the initiative to pursue ways that can enable the community to use these lands in new and enjoyable ways.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 16, 2014) Letter from City Council on Hydro Corridor Lease Agreements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-70756.pdf

Audit Committee - Meeting 16

AU16.1 - City of Toronto - 2013 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Audit Committee requested that the Speaker of Council be advised of the Committee's request that this Item be time specific at the July 8-9, 2014 City Council meeting in order to allow residents to watch the presentation and debate.

 

The following City officials made a presentation to the Audit Committee on the City of Toronto 2013 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements:

 

-           Giuliana Carbone, Treasurer

 

-           Mike St. Amant, Director, Accounting Services, City of Toronto.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the Treasurer

Summary

This report presents the City of Toronto's Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 to Committee and Council for approval and provides highlights of the City’s 2013 financial performance and financial condition as of December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Treasurer, submitting the 2013 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70531.pdf
Appendix A - 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70532.pdf
Appendix B - Key Issues/Risks Facing the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70533.pdf
Appendix C - Glossary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70534.pdf
City of Toronto - 2013 Year-end Report - submitted by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (AU16.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70584.pdf
(June 27, 2014) Presentation Materials submitted by the Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-71038.pdf

AU16.2 - Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 - Agencies and Corporations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

That:

 

1.         City Council receive for information, the 2013 Financial Statements and related documents for the following agencies and corporations:

 

-           Exhibition Place

-           The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation

-           St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts

-           Toronto Atmospheric Fund

-           Toronto Parking Authority

-           Toronto Public Library

-           Toronto Transit Commission

-           Yonge-Dundas Square

-           Heritage Toronto

-           Toronto Zoo.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Audit Committee received for information, the 2013 Financial Statements and related documents for the following corporations, having regard that the Statements have previously been considered by City Council:

 

-           Build Toronto

-           Casa Loma Corporation

-           Lakeshore Arena Corporation

-           Toronto Port Lands Company.

Summary

The following agencies and corporations have submitted 2013 Financial Statements and related documents to the Audit Committee for consideration:

 

-           Exhibition Place

-           The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation

-           St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts

-           Toronto Atmospheric Fund

-           Toronto Parking Authority

-           Toronto Public Library

-           Toronto Transit Commission

-           Yonge-Dundas Square.

 

In addition, City Council on June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014, received and forwarded the 2013 Financial Statements of the following corporations to the Audit Committee for information:

 

-           Build Toronto

-           Casa Loma Corporation

-           Lakeshore Arena Corporation

-           Toronto Port Lands Company.

2a - Exhibition Place - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for Exhibition Place for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 24, 2014) Communication from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, regarding 2013 Financial Statements (Final Version)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70989.pdf
(June 13, 2014) Communication from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, regarding 2013 Financial Statements (Draft Version)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70749.pdf
(June 13, 2014) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, forwarding 2013 Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70816.pdf
Financial Statements - Exhibition Place - as at December 31, 2013 (Final version posted on June 24, 2014, replaces version previously marked as Draft)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70750.pdf
Management Letter to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, from the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70753.pdf
(June 13, 2014) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, forwarding 2013 Audit Results
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70751.pdf
Year-end Report - Exhibition Place - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70752.pdf

2b - The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (operating as the Toronto Centre for the Arts) - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (operating as the Toronto Centre for the Arts) for the year ending December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (operating as the Toronto Centre for the Arts) - December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70486.pdf
Year-end Report - The North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70487.pdf
(June 6, 2014) Management Letter from the General Manager, North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70488.pdf

2c - St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts as at December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts - December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70155.pdf
Year-end Report - St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70156.pdf
(April 24, 2014) Management Letter from the General Manager, and the Director of Finance, St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70157.pdf

2d - Toronto Atmospheric Fund - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Consolidated Financial Statements for the Toronto Atmospheric Fund for the year ending December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statement - Toronto Atmospheric Fund - December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70507.pdf
Explanatory Note to Financial Statements - Toronto Atmospheric Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70508.pdf
Audit Year-end Report - Toronto Atmospheric Fund - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70529.pdf
Annual Report 2013 - Toronto Atmospheric Fund
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70530.pdf

2e - Toronto Parking Authority - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Parking Authority for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - Toronto Parking Authority - December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70483.pdf
Year-end Report - Toronto Parking Authority - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70484.pdf

2f - Toronto Public Library Board - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Public Library Board as at December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 3, 2014) Report from the City Librarian, forwarding Financial Statements for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 - Toronto Public Library Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70367.pdf
Financial Statements - Toronto Public Library Board - December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70368.pdf
Year-end Report - Toronto Public Library Board - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70369.pdf

2g - Toronto Transit Commission - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Consolidated Financial Statements for the Toronto Transit Commission for the year ended

December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 2, 2014) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, TTC, forwarding Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70224.pdf
Financial Statements - Toronto Transit Commission - December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70225.pdf
(June 2, 2014) Letter from the Chief Financial and Administration Officer, TTC, forwarding the Year-end Report - Toronto Transit Commission
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70179.pdf
Year-end Report - Toronto Transit Commission - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70180.pdf

2h - Yonge-Dundas Square - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary
Financial Statements for Yonge-Dundas Square for the year ending December 31, 2013.
Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - Yonge-Dundas Square - December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70406.pdf
Audit Results Letter - Yonge-Dundas Square - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70407.pdf

2m - Heritage Toronto - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for Heritage Toronto as at December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
Financial Statements - Heritage Toronto, December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70971.pdf
Year-end Report - Heritage Toronto - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70972.pdf

2n - Toronto Zoo - 2013 Financial Statements

Summary

Financial Statements for the Toronto Zoo for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 25, 2014) Decision Letter from the Board of Management of the Toronto Zoo, forwarding the Toronto Zoo's 2013 Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-71024.pdf
(May 28, 2014) Report from the Chief Operating Officer, Toronto Zoo, regarding the 2013 Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-71025.pdf
Financial Statements - Toronto Zoo - December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-71022.pdf
Year-end Report - Toronto Zoo - for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-71023.pdf

AU16.3 - Status of the Financial Audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the Year Ended December 31, 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive for information, the report (June 12, 2014) from the Auditor General on the status of the financial audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Origin

(June 12, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the status of financial audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the year ended December 31, 2013.

 

The majority of the audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations have been completed and approved by their respective Boards.  Any financial statements that are outstanding will be available for the next Audit Committee meeting, anticipated for February 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 12, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Status of the Financial Audits of the City’s Agencies and Corporations for the Year Ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70631.pdf

AU16.4 - Trust Funds - 2013 Audited Consolidated Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2013 Trust Fund Statements as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2014) from the Treasurer.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report presents the City of Toronto’s Consolidated Trust Funds Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 to Committee and City Council for approval and provide highlights of the Trust Funds' 2013 financial performance and financial condition as of December 31, 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer - 2013 Audited Trust Funds Consolidated Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70538.pdf
Appendix A - 2013 Trust Funds - Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70539.pdf
Appendix B - Trust Fund Account Descriptions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70540.pdf
City of Toronto Trust Funds - 2013 Year-end Report - submitted by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (AU16.4a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70583.pdf

AU16.5 - Sinking Funds - 2013 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2013 Sinking Funds Statements as attached in Appendix A to the report (June 11, 2014) from the Treasurer.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report presents the City of Toronto’s Sinking Funds Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2013 to Committee and Council for approval and provides highlights of the Sinking Funds' 2013 financial performance and financial condition as of December 31, 2013. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer regarding the 2013 Audited Sinking Funds Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70535.pdf
Appendix A - Financial Statements - City of Toronto Sinking Funds, December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70536.pdf
City of Toronto Sinking Funds - 2013 Year-end Report - submitted by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (AU16.5a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70659.pdf

AU16.6 - Community Centres - 2013 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the 2013 audited financial statements of Community Centres attached as Appendices to the report (June 11, 2014) from the Auditor General.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the 2013 audited financial statements of Community Centres.

 

The 2013 audited financial statements for the ten Community Centres are presented to Audit Committee after approval by their respective Boards of Management.  The external auditors, Welch LLP, advise that they have provided their comments on internal controls to each organization by way of a report to the Board.  Welch LLP's reports are appended to this report.

 

The financial statements for the Ralph Thornton Community Centre and Scadding Court Community Centre were not available at the time of preparation of this report but are expected to be available for the next meeting of the Audit Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Community Centres - 2013 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70605.pdf
Appendix 1: 519 Church Street Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70606.pdf
Appendix 2: Applegrove Community Complex
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70607.pdf
Appendix 3: Cecil Street Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70608.pdf
Appendix 4: Central Eglinton Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70609.pdf
Appendix 5: Community Centre 55
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70610.pdf
Appendix 6: Eastview Neighbourhood Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70611.pdf
Appendix 7: Harbourfront Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70612.pdf
Appendix 8: Swansea Town Hall Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70613.pdf
Appendix 9: Ralph Thornton Community Centre (not yet available)
Appendix 10: Scadding Court Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70617.pdf

AU16.7 - Arenas - 2013 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

 The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the 2013 audited financial statements of Arenas attached as Appendices to the report (June 11, 2014) from the Auditor General, save and except Appendix 6:  North Toronto Memorial Arena.

 

2.         City Council direct the Board of Management for North Toronto Memorial Arena to adjust their 2013 Financial Statements to address the qualified audit opinion, and to provide a copy of re-issued Financial Statements directly to the Auditor General for review as soon as possible. The Auditor General to determine whether all issues have been appropriately addressed, and if so, submit the Statements to City Council for consideration on August 26, 2014.

 

3.         City Council direct the Board of Management for North Toronto Memorial Arena to ensure that all future Financial Statements are issued without a qualified audit opinion.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with the 2013 audited financial statements of Arenas.

 

The 2013 audited financial statements for the eight City Arenas are presented to the Audit Committee after approval by their respective Boards or Committees of Management.  The external auditors, Welch LLP, advise that they have provided their comments on internal controls to each organization by way of a report to the Board. Welch LLP’s reports are appended to this report.

 

The external auditors issued a qualified opinion on the financial statements of the North Toronto Memorial Arena.  The qualified opinion was on the basis that the Arena has not recognized the vacation or payroll liability as at December 31, 2013, which constitutes a departure from Canadian public sector accounting standards.

 

The financial statements for the Ted Reeve Community Arena and William H. Bolton Arena were not available at the time of preparation of this report but are expected to be available for the next meeting of Audit Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - 2013 Audited Financial Statements of Arenas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70640.pdf
Appendix 1: Committee of Management - Forest Hill Memorial Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70641.pdf
Appendix 2: Committee of Management - George Bell Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70642.pdf
Appendix 3: Committee of Management - Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70643.pdf
Appendix 4: Committee of Management - McCormick Playground Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70644.pdf
Appendix 5: Board of Management - Moss Park Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70645.pdf
Appendix 6: Board of Management - North Toronto Memorial Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70646.pdf
Appendix 7: Committee of Management - Ted Reeve Community Arena (not yet available)
Appendix 8: Committee of Management - William H. Bolton Arena (not yet available)

AU16.8 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2013 Audited Financial Statements - Report No. 1

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the 2013 audited financial statements and management letters of the forty-two (42) Business Improvement Areas attached as Appendices A to AQ of the report (June 11, 2014) from the Treasurer and the Director, Business Growth Services, Economic Development and Culture.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer and Director, Business Growth Services, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present the 2013 audited financial statements and management letters for forty-two (42) Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) to Audit Committee and City Council for its approval.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Treasurer and Director, Business Growth Services, Economic Development and Culture - 2013 Audited Financial Statements of Business Improvement Areas (BIAs)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70541.pdf
Appendix A: Baby Point Gates Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70542.pdf
Appendix B: Bloor Annex Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70543.pdf
Appendix C: Bloor By The Park Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70544.pdf
Appendix D: Bloor Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70545.pdf
Appendix E: Bloor West Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70547.pdf
Appendix F: Bloor Yorkville Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70548.pdf
Appendix G: Bloorcourt Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70549.pdf
Appendix H: Chinatown Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70551.pdf
Appendix I: Church-Wellesley Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70552.pdf
Appendix J: Corso Italia Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70553.pdf
Appendix K: Crossroads of the Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70554.pdf
Appendix L: Danforth Mosaic Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70555.pdf
Appendix M: Danforth Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70556.pdf
Appendix N: Downtown Yonge Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70557.pdf
Appendix N1: Downtown Yonge Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70558.pdf
Appendix O: Fairbank Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70559.pdf
Appendix P: Financial District Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70560.pdf
Appendix P1: Financial District Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70525.pdf
Appendix Q: Forest Hill Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70526.pdf
Appendix R: Greektown on the Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70527.pdf
Appendix S: Harbord Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70528.pdf
Appendix T: Hillcrest Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70569.pdf
Appendix U: Junction Gardens Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70570.pdf
Appendix V: Kennedy Road Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70571.pdf
Appendix W: Kingsway Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70572.pdf
Appendix X: Korea Town Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70573.pdf
Appendix Y: Leslieville Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70562.pdf
Appendix Y1: Leslieville Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70574.pdf
Appendix Z: Mimico Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70575.pdf
Appendix AA: Mirvish Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70576.pdf
Appendix AB: Mount Dennis Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70577.pdf
Appendix AC: Pape Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70578.pdf
Appendix AD: Parkdale Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70579.pdf
Appendix AE: Riverside Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70580.pdf
Appendix AF: Rosedale Main Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70563.pdf
Appendix AG: Sheppard East Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70565.pdf
Appendix AH: St. Clair Gardens Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70566.pdf
Appendix AI: St. Lawrence Market Neighbourhood Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70567.pdf
Appendix AJ: The Beach Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70568.pdf
Appendix AK: The Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70589.pdf
Appendix AL: The Eglinton Way Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70590.pdf
Appendix AM: The Waterfront Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70591.pdf
Appendix AN: Toronto Entertainment District Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70592.pdf
Appendix AN1: Toronto Entertainment District Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70593.pdf
Appendix AO: Uptown Yonge Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70594.pdf
Appendix AP: Yonge-Lawrence Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70596.pdf
Appendix AQ: A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani dated May 26, 2014 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70597.pdf

AU16.10 - Auditor General’s Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Divisions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies and corporations; and litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies and corporations.

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (June 11, 2014) from the Auditor General for information.

 

2.         City Council authorize the public release of the recommendations and management comments contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (June 11, 2014) from the Auditor General at the discretion of the City Solicitor, in consultation with the City Manager.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report provides information regarding the implementation status of audit recommendations contained in various reports issued by the Auditor General to City divisions.  On an annual basis the Auditor General reviews the implementation status of outstanding audit recommendations and reports the results of the review to Council through Audit Committee.

 

Since July 1, 2008 the Auditor General has issued various reports containing a total of 570 recommendations.  Since that time 14 of these recommendations have been identified by the Auditor General as no longer relevant.  Factors such as reorganizations and changes in business practices and service levels have rendered these recommendations as no longer relevant.  Consequently, 556 of the 570 recommendations continue to have relevance.

 

Management has made progress on implementing outstanding audit recommendations.  However, a number of recommendations have been outstanding for a long period of time.  Our analysis indicates 32 recommendations have been outstanding for over three years and 13 of these recommendations are outstanding for over five years.  Management should take steps to implement these recommendations.  

 

The results of our review indicate management has fully implemented 389 or 70 per cent of the recommendations made by the Auditor General during the five year period from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2013.

 

From a historical perspective, the Auditor General has issued 1,432 recommendations since January 1, 1999.  Management has fully implemented 87 per cent or 1,252 of these 1,432 recommendations.  Continued efforts to implement outstanding recommendations will provide additional benefit to the City through cost savings, additional revenue and enhanced service delivery.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Divisions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70627.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

AU16.11 - Auditor General’s Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Agencies and Corporations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (June 11, 2014) from the City Auditor for information.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report provides information regarding the implementation status of audit recommendations contained in various reports issued by the Auditor General to City Agencies and Corporations.  On an annual basis the Auditor General reviews the implementation status of outstanding audit recommendations and reports the results of the review to City Council through Audit Committee.

 

Since July 1, 2008 the Auditor General has issued various reports to City Agencies and Corporations containing a total of 168 recommendations.  Since that time nine of these recommendations have been identified by the Auditor General as no longer relevant.  These recommendations are no longer relevant as reorganizations and changes in business practices and service levels have rendered them no longer applicable.  Consequently, 159 of the recommendations continue to have relevance.

 

The results of our review indicate that on a combined basis, City Agencies and Corporations have implemented 77 per cent or 122 of the recommendations made by the Auditor General from July 1, 2008 to June 30, 2013.

 

Continued efforts to implement outstanding recommendations will provide additional benefit to City Agencies and Corporations through cost savings, additional revenue and enhanced service delivery.

 

This update on the status of outstanding recommendations includes the following City Agencies and Corporations:

  1. Toronto Parking Authority
  2. Toronto Police Services
  3. Toronto Transit Commission

 

In addition, the follow-up results for the reports issued to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) are presented in a separate report.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Status Report on Outstanding Audit Recommendations for City Agencies and Corporations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70598.pdf

AU16.12 - Auditor General’s Office - Forensic Unit Status Report on Outstanding Recommendations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (June 9, 2014) from the Auditor General for information.

Origin

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report provides information regarding the implementation status of recommendations made by the Forensic Unit of the Auditor General’s Office which were publicly reported through Audit Committee.  These recommendations were made in the context of annual Fraud and Waste Hotline reports or other special reviews such as the 2013 report on Fleet Services Division - Review of Various Equipment Maintenance Practices.

On an annual basis, the Auditor General reviews information provided by management to determine the accuracy of management assertions related to each recommendation.  The results of this review are communicated to Council through Audit Committee.

Since January 2007, the Auditor General has issued various reports related to its operation of the City’s Fraud and Waste Hotline Program.  Since that time a total of 27 recommendations have been reported publicly.

The results of our review indicate management has not fully implemented fourteen outstanding recommendations made in reports by the Auditor General’s Forensic Unit from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013.

Continued efforts to implement outstanding recommendations will provide additional benefit to the City through cost savings, additional revenue and enhanced service delivery.

As well, an additional 23 recommendations were made to management staff in the context of confidential investigation reports and have been fully implemented.  The implementation status of confidential recommendations is communicated directly to the City Manager.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Forensic Unit Status Report on Outstanding Recommendations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70639.pdf

AU16.15 - Opportunities to Enhance the Oversight of Non-Union Employee Separation Costs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Executive Director, Human Resources Division to regularly track non-union employee separation costs.

 

2.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Executive Director, Human Resources Division and the City Solicitor, to report annually, to the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on cumulative non-union employee separation costs.  The information reported should include a sufficient level of detail and analyses that allows adequate oversight of separation costs, while ensuring that personal information is protected.

 

3.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Executive Director, Human Resources Division, to review the current process for approving separation costs in order to ensure that the authorization levels are appropriate in the circumstances.  In particular, the process should require the City Manager to approve non-union terminations involving exceptional separation arrangements as well as terminations that would give rise to a conflict of interest risk.

 

4.         City Council request the City Manager to ensure that all separation costs, including any exceptions, are documented and approved in accordance with the required approvals set out in the Separation Program.

 

5.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Executive Director, Human Resources Division and the City Solicitor, to consider developing and implementing proactive measures to identify terminated employees who have found employment elsewhere to ensure the comparable employment provisions are being followed.  Steps to be considered should include but not be limited to:

 

            a.         periodically mail out notices to employees who receive a separation payment, inquiring as to their employment status;

 

            b.         periodically perform search of publicly available information on the internet; and 

           

            c.         recover overpayments where appropriate.

 

6.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Executive Director, Human Resources Division and the City Solicitor, to conduct a formal review of the City’s Separation Program on a periodic basis, to ensure that the program remains fair and consistent with the practices of other municipalities and organizations, employment legislation and common law practices.  All revisions should be reflected in the Separation Program and Strategies manual accordingly.

 

7.         City Council request the City Manager to work with both Human Resources and Division Heads to ensure that annual performance evaluations clearly reflect employees performance.  Documentation be retained for all employees particularly those employees who do not meet expectations.

 

8.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Executive Director, Human Resources Division and the Director, Accounting Services, to develop and implement a communication protocol to ensure that separation costs are properly accounted for in the financial statements.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Auditor General made a presentation to the Audit Committee on the Opportunities to Enhance the Oversight of Non-union Employee Separation Costs.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General’s 2014 Work Plan included a review of the City’s non-union employee separation costs.  The City has statutory and legal obligations to provide separation pay to an affected employee when the employment relationship is terminated by the City.  From 2011 to 2013, 90 terminated non-union employees received separation payments.  Annually, this represents less than one per cent of the 4,200 non-union employees employed by the City.  The average separation amount was approximately $120,000 per employee.

 

The objective of this review was to ensure that non-union employee separation costs have been awarded in accordance with City policies.  For the most part, our review found that separation costs were awarded in accordance with City policies, procedures and applicable regulations.  However, there are opportunities to enhance certain oversight activities.

 

This report contains eight recommendations along with a management response to each of the recommendations.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Opportunities to Enhance the Oversight of Non-Union Employee Separation Costs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70638.pdf
(June 27, 2014) Presentation Materials submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-71040.pdf

AU16.16 - Controls Over Telecommunication Expenses Need Improvement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies and corporations.

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Information Officer to develop a process for reviewing contract compliance during the time the contract is awarded as well as during the contract period.

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review existing payment processes for traffic light circuits and evaluate the need to obtain a formal contract for traffic light circuits to include payment requirements, terms, conditions and service levels.

3.         City Council request the City Manager to direct divisions to implement a process for ongoing review and monitoring of telecommunication costs including costs incurred by management employees responsible for approving billing invoices.
Costs incurred as a result of personal use should be reimbursed to the City.

4.         City Council request the City Manager to direct divisions to review controls over access and use of group wireless devices.  The inventory of group wireless devices should be reviewed and those not required should be cancelled.

5.         City Council request the City Manager in consultation with the Chief Information Officer consider placing limitations and restrictions on long distance calls outside North America.  In particular, long distance calling capability should be disabled on group devices.

6.         City Council request the Chief Information Officer to implement a process for timely reporting of telecommunication expenses and related details to divisions.  Wireless service providers should be directed to provide additional billing details to assist in divisional review and analysis of voice and data use charges. 

7.         City Council request the City Manager to direct divisions to ensure wireless device users purchase appropriate wireless voice and data travel packages before travelling outside Canada. 

8.         City Council request the City Manager to direct divisional management to ensure users understand wireless service plan usage limits.  Appropriate changes to plans should be requested on a timely basis to avoid unnecessary costs.

9.         City Council request the Chief Information Officer to review options for conference calling and evaluate whether cost savings could be achieved. 

10.       City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to develop a process to periodically reconcile invoices paid from SAP with the invoices approved in the NetPlus telecommunication system.

11.       City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to review the existing process of manually updating invoice payment information from SAP to the NetPlus telecommunication system and evaluate whether the process can be automated.

12.       City Council request the Chief Information Officer to implement a process ensuring vendor invoices agree with amounts provided in vendor contracts before payments are approved.

13.       City Council request the Chief Information Officer to perform a detailed review of 2013 and any prior period invoices for telecommunication service providers.  Respective wireless vendors should be contacted regarding refund of any overpayments identified. 

14.       City Council request the Chief Information Officer to implement measures to ensure extra work order invoices are validated with price quotes where appropriate and accompanied by work completion reports before payment. 

15.       City Council request the City Manager to direct divisions to review their respective inventory of telecommunication devices to ensure that it reflects the current status of such devices.  Inventories should be adjusted where appropriate and reviews should be performed on a periodic basis. 

16.       City Council request the City Manager to develop exception reporting criteria to assist in evaluating unnecessary telecommunication costs.  Criteria identified should include devices and services with no activity, suspended phones beyond a specified period and phones no longer in use.  Devices and services no longer required should be cancelled. 

17.       City Council request the Chief Information Officer to develop a process requiring formal written documentation for granting access to the NetPlus telecommunication system.  Periodic review of NetPlus system user access should be conducted to ensure continued access aligns with job duties.

18.       City Council request the Chief Executive Officers of City Agencies and Corporations review the issues and recommendations included in this report and consider the relevance to their respective organizations.  Particular emphasis should be placed on evaluating the cost benefit of converting landlines to Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP). 

19.       City Council adopt the confidential recommendations in the Confidential Attachment.

 

20.       City Council not authorize the public release of the information contained in the  Confidential Attachment as it relates to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or its agencies and corporations.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Alan Ash, Director, Auditor General's Office, made a presentation to the Audit Committee - Controls over Telecommunication Expenses Need Improvement.

Origin

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General’s Audit Work Plan included a review of City telecommunication expenses and controls.  This review was selected due to the significant amount of funds involved and the fact that the Auditor General’s Office had not reviewed this area since 2005.  In 2013, telecommunication costs for the City were $19.2 million.

 

The objective of this review was to assess internal controls over the management of telecommunication contracts, payment of vendor invoices, telecommunication device inventory, and oversight of telecommunication expenses.

 

This report includes results reported through a public report enclosed as Appendix 1 and a confidential report attached as Attachment 1.  The public report and the confidential attachment combined contain 20 recommendations that will result in reduced telecommunication costs and improved controls over telecommunication expenses, and the management of telecommunication contracts. 

 

This report also includes one recommendation to City Agencies and Corporations.  The recommendation relates to the need for City Agencies and Corporations to evaluate the feasibility of converting telephone landlines to Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP).  Our review indicates significant savings can be achieved through the conversion of existing landlines to VOIP. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Controls Over Telecommunication Expenses Need Improvement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70658.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
(June 27, 2014) Presentation Materials submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-71041.pdf

AU16.17 - Cost Benefits of Extended Warranties for Construction Projects Are Unknown

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Manager to review the costs and benefits of the standard use of a two-year warranty period in construction contracts.

 

2.         City Council request the City Manager to standardize procedures for warranty administration.  Policies and procedures should hold construction contract project managers responsible for tracking and monitoring construction performance bonds, warranty periods, inspections and defects requiring repair.

 

3.         City Council request the City Manager to develop warranty documentation standards and reports to improve information tracking and communication between staff.

 

4.         City Council request the City Manager to review technology currently available to improve warranty administration and communication Citywide.

Origin

(May 1, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General’s Audit Work Plan included a review of City construction contract warranties.  This review was selected due to the significant amount of funds involved and previous Auditor General reports identifying deficiencies in construction project warranty tracking and follow-up.

 

This report provides four recommendations which will strengthen controls over construction contract warranties.  The implementation of the four recommendations included in this report will improve warranty and performance bond tracking, and provide information related to the cost effectiveness and benefits of construction project warranties and performance bonds.  Potential cost savings may be realized by reducing the warranty period on certain construction projects from two years to one year.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 1, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Cost Benefits of Extended Warranties for Construction Projects Are Unknown
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70618.pdf

AU16.18 - Opportunities to Enhance Employee Absenteeism Performance Measures and Reporting of Results

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Executive Director, Human Resources Division to report annually to the Employee and Labour Relations Committee on employee absenteeism including statistics, performance measures and trend analyses.

2.         City Council request the Executive Director, Human Resources Division to look for opportunities to benchmark the City's employee absenteeism results with other municipalities or organizations.

3.         City Council request the Executive Director, Human Resources Division in consultation with the Director, Pension, Payroll and Employee Benefits to consider enhancing the employee absenteeism performance measures currently in place.

Origin

(April 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General’s 2013 Audit Work Plan included a review of employees' absenteeism due to illness or personal injury.  Absenteeism has a direct impact on productivity that often results in additional costs to the city from employment of replacement staff and overtime.  In 2013, the estimated direct cost of salaries paid to absent employees amounted to $71.7 million ($89.2 million when ill dependent time is included).  The objective for this audit was to determine if there are opportunities to enhance the tracking and reporting of absenteeism performance measures by Human Resources for all City employees.

 

This report contains three recommendations along with a management response to each of the recommendations.

Background Information (Committee)

(April 11, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Opportunities to Enhance Employee Absenteeism Performance Measures and Reporting of Results
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70624.pdf

AU16.19 - Strengthening the City’s Oversight of Social Housing Programs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to develop a risk based process for reviewing eligibility files to ensure that housing providers are effectively administering rent-geared-to-income assistance. 

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to conduct an assessment among housing providers of training needs and develop appropriate strategies to meet the needs of staff who perform and oversee eligibility reviews.

 

3.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to develop a strategy to deal with potential social housing tenant fraud which as a minimum should include the following:

 

a        policies and procedures setting out standards for staff performing investigations;

 

b        guidelines for housing providers on the steps to be taken in situations where tenant fraud is suspected;

 

c.         provide tools and training for provider and City staff assigned to detecting and investigating irregular activities; and

d        ensure the divisional Fraud Action Plan addresses the potential for tenant fraud.

4.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration in collaboration with the General Manager of Toronto Employment and Social Services and the General Manager of Children’s Services explore opportunities to:

 

a        share information for the purpose of verifying eligibility for each program; and

b        collaborate on investigations regarding mutual clients who may be involved in irregular activities.

5.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to use the provincial database to track rent arrears and rent-geared-to-income funds to be recovered.

6.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to report as part of the annual budget process on number of rent-geared-to-income households provided assistance and the total assistance provided.

7.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to update service agreements with social housing providers and include total housing units in the building and any details concerning other obligations such as but not restricted to:

a        any specific mandate for the building;

b.         number of market units in the building;

c        minimum number of rent-geared-to-income units to be maintained at all times; and

d        minimum number and type of accessible units to be maintained in the building.

8.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to ensure the Social Housing Administration System contains complete and accurate information concerning the mandate, and number and type of units available and occupied in each building.

9.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in collaboration with the Director of Affordable Housing, ensure all affordable housing units are transferred to Social Housing for ongoing administration to make sure they are occupied by appropriate households.

10.       City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to establish controls to ensure that Annual Information Returns are received, reviewed and processed within the standard timelines established by the Division.

11.       City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to develop a standardized process for conducting and tracking operational reviews and criteria to determine the frequency and breadth of the review. 

12.       City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to revise the policies and procedures relating to providers in difficulty and ensure criteria are developed to guide specific interventions. 

13.       City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report to City Council in the spring of 2015 on the potential financial implications of obtaining property tax exemptions for eligible social housing providers.

14.       City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to review all social housing projects to identify those where ownership of the property reverts to the City when the lease expires.

Origin

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General’s Work Plan included a review of social housing subsidies administered by the Social Housing Unit in the Shelter, Support and Housing Administration Division.  The expenditures for the Social Housing Unit in 2013 were $466 million. 

 

The objective of this review was to assess the adequacy of the City’s oversight of social housing in ensuring the accuracy of rent-geared-to-income (RGI) assistance provided to eligible households and operating subsidies to housing providers. 

 

While Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) is the main provider of social housing units in the City, the focus of this review was on the City's oversight of the additional 246 not-for-profit social housing providers.  In 2013, RGI assistance was provided to 52,309 households living in TCHC housing units and an additional 14,829 households living in housing units supplied by other social housing providers.

 

This report contains 14 recommendations.  Addressing the recommendations in this report will strengthen the City’s oversight role as the service manager for social housing programs. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Strengthening the City’s Oversight of Social Housing Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-70649.pdf

Board of Health - Meeting 32

HL32.2 - Strategies to Prevent Heat-Related Illness and Deaths from Extreme Heat Emergencies

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Board Recommendations

The Board of Health recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Medical Officer of Health, to work through The Emergency Management Program Committee (TEMPC) and the Emergency Management Working Group to ensure that heat emergency preparedness and management includes measures to identify vulnerable populations and to provide outreach and heat relief through:

 

a.         a review of heat related risks as part of annual risk assessment;

 

b.         updating Operational Support Functions as required; and

 

c.         updating the Emergency Plan as required.

Board Decision Advice and Other Information

The Board of Health:

 

1.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health to engage with Toronto area Local Health Integrated Networks (Central West, Mississauga/Halton, Toronto Central, Central and Central East) to:

 

a.         ensure that all hospitals and other health service providers have adequate plans to respond to a heat emergency; and

 

b.         encourage all health service providers to ensure that vulnerability assessments for all clients consider if they will be affected by extreme heat.

 

2.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health to collaborate with the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of the Environment and Energy Division to:

 

a.         ensure that extreme heat events are considered in the Resilient City divisional risk assessments related to extreme weather, including power outages, and that measures are developed to prevent adverse health impacts; and

 

b.         develop and implement an engagement strategy with key stakeholders from the private sector and community services sector to improve resiliency.

 

3.         In order to reduce heat-related illnesses and deaths, requested the Medical Officer of Health to work with the appropriate city officials to fast track implementing the following actions:

 

a.         expand the urban tree canopy, increase green infrastructure, and expand pedestrian and bike networks to reduce the urban heat island effect;

 

b.         increase energy conservation measures, incentivize developing renewable power generation in all buildings to support building a resilient distributed energy system to reduce the impact of brown-outs and black-outs.

 

4.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health to develop and implement a comprehensive health-focused "extreme heat prevention and preparation" public education campaign that focuses on preventative actions Torontonians can take to reduce extreme heat illnesses and deaths. The public education campaign should include:

 

a.         outreach and engagement of vulnerable populations in multi-residential buildings;

 

b.         community forums and partnership engagement with NGOs and community groups; and

 

c.         education activities that target the general public using media, social media, and the public education system.

 

5.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health to work with the Province of Ontario to:

 

a.         develop coordinated and harmonized provincial extreme heat and cold alert systems and response plans;

 

b.         provide appropriate resources required to maximize prevention of, and preparation for public health emergencies that will come from heat-related illnesses and deaths due to severe heat caused by climate change.

 

6.         Forwarded the report (June 13, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health to Toronto Community Housing with the request that they develop a strategy for protecting vulnerable residents in extreme heat, especially the elderly.

 

7.         Forwarded the report (June 13, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health to the Canadian Red Cross, Ontario Medical Association, Faith and the Common Good, Social Planning Toronto and Street Health.

Origin

(June 13, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health

Summary

Due to the changing climate, Toronto can expect a fivefold increase in three-day heat waves and an increased likelihood of a heat emergency with high mortality such as has occurred in large cities in other developed countries.  Climate models suggest that by 2049, the annual average temperature will have increased by 4.4 degrees celsius and there will be more than triple the amount of days (approximately 60) with temperatures that exceed 30 degrees celsius compared to historical conditions (2000 to 2009).  As heat episodes increase, so will the health impacts.

 

Currently, Toronto Public Health administers the Heat Alert and Response Program to prevent heat related deaths and illness during usual summertime conditions.  However, the program was not designed to address heat emergencies when heat conditions are more severe and last longer, and which may lead to high mortality.  In that case, the Medical Officer of Health can request the Toronto Office of Emergency Management activate the City of Toronto’s Emergency Operations Centre (EOC) and if necessary, scale up the response through the City's Emergency Plan.  To date, the City's Emergency Plan has never been activated for a heat event.

 

This report outlines strategies to strengthen Toronto's preparedness for heat emergencies, strengthen the healthcare sector's preparedness for heat emergencies, build Toronto's resiliency and develop policies that increase access to cool spaces for heat-vulnerable populations.

Background Information (Board)

(June 13, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health on Strategies to Prevent Heat-Related Illness and Deaths from Extreme Heat Emergencies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-70709.pdf

Speakers

Scott Leon
Franz Hartmann, Executive Director, Toronto Environmental Alliance

Communications (Board)

(June 30, 2014) Submission from Franz Hartmann, Executive Director, Toronto Environmental Alliance (HL.New.HL32.2.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-48439.pdf
(June 30, 2014) Submission from Scott Leon (HL.New.HL32.2.2)

HL32.3 - Comprehensive Review of Cold Weather Protocols and Cold Weather Health Impacts in Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
To be considered with Item CD30.6

Board Recommendations

The Board of Health recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the transfer of responsibility for co-ordinating Toronto’s cold weather alert and response program from Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to the Medical Officer of Health in time for the 2014-2015 cold weather season.

Board Decision Advice and Other Information

The Board of Health, should City Council approve the transfer of responsibility for co-ordinating Toronto's cold weather alert and response program from Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to the Medical Officer of Health in time for the 2014-2015 cold weather season:

 

1.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health to assume responsibility for calling Extreme Cold Weather Alerts as of the 2014-2015 cold weather season when Environment Canada forecasts a temperature of -15 °C or colder, taking into account wind chill and other weather conditions.

 

2.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health to update the weather criteria for calling Extreme Cold Weather Alerts as appropriate based on current scientific evidence.

 

3.         Requested that the Medical Officer of Health to develop a comprehensive Cold Weather Plan in collaboration with the General Manager of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and other City officials as appropriate to reduce health risks for City of Toronto populations.

 

4.         Requested the Medical Officer of Health in, collaboration with appropriate City agencies, to identify and develop strategies to prevent potential health impacts associated with the range of inclement weather types that could adversely impact Toronto as a result of our changing and highly variable climate.

 

5.         Requested Medical Officer of Health, in collaboration with the General Manager of Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, and in consultation with community stakeholders, to develop as part of the Cold Weather Plan an enhanced communications strategy to ensure that at-risk populations are aware of the health risks, protective interventions and available services associated with cold weather, including during Extreme Weather Alerts.

 

6.         Forwarded the report (June 10, 2014) from the Medical Officer of Health and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to Public Health Ontario, Environment Canada, Health Canada, the Director of the Environment and Energy Division, and Social Planning Toronto.

Origin

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report reviews the temperature thresholds for issuing an Extreme Cold Weather Alert and whether any changes to the protocol are required. It also reports the findings of program reviews of the Metro Hall Warming Centre pilot project and the Out of the Cold program, and updates City Council on previous Council direction to open all 172 flex beds to relieve occupancy pressure in the shelter system.

 

In cold weather, hypothermia, frostbite, and trenchfoot can arise relatively quickly among homeless populations as a result of direct exposure to cold, with severe consequences including death. Emerging research now shows that cold weather also likely increases overall deaths and hospitalizations in Toronto, mainly due to cardiovascular and respiratory causes. Those most at risk among the general population are the elderly and people with pre-existing health concerns.

 

To protect homeless populations, Shelter Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) co-ordinates a suite of winter services including respite services such as drop-in centres that provide temporary escape from the cold, outreach services to connect with individuals on the street and check on their condition, and additional shelter beds. Currently, SSHA calls Extreme Cold Weather Alerts when the temperature reaches -15 °C or colder, or when other extreme winter weather conditions or circumstances warrant it, such as a severe snow storm. During an Alert, SSHA scales up street outreach, transit token availability and shelter access.

 

A new Cold Weather Plan co-ordinated by Toronto Public Health (rather than SSHA), with the Medical Officer of Health responsible for calling Extreme Cold Weather Alerts, will enable the full range of health impacts known to be associated with cold weather to be addressed and offers an ideal opportunity to review and update the criteria for calling Alerts. This transition aligns with practise across much of Ontario, is consistent with the City's approach to calling heat alerts, and provides an opportunity to engage City and community partners in a co-ordinated approach to cold weather messaging and response. As part of this plan, SSHA will maintain a leadership role in providing services to homeless populations.

 

The Metro Hall Warming Centre pilot and the Out of the Cold program are low barrier/low threshold programs that serve people living in precarious housing and a segment of homeless people at risk of exposure to extreme cold weather including those who do not regularly access other homeless support programs or services.  These programs provide a valuable service and should be continued.

 

The activated flex beds removed flexibility from the shelter system to respond to sudden demand surges and compromised Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's ability to respond to such surges in a timely fashion.  Flex beds should be returned to their original purpose, as soon as permanent shelter beds can be introduced to the system.

Background Information (Board)

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) on the Comprehensive Review of Cold Weather Protocols and Cold Weather Health Impacts in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-70673.pdf
(June 10, 2014) Attachment - Summary of Warming Centre Pilot Evaluation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/bgrd/backgroundfile-70674.pdf

Speakers

Tim Maguire, President, CUPE Local 79
Scott Leon

Communications (Board)

(June 28, 2014) E-mail from Reverend Maggie Helwig and Reverend Andrea Budgey, Church of St. Stephen-in-the-Fields (HL.New.HL32.3.1)
(June 28, 2014) Letter from Cathy Crowe, RN, BAAN, M.Ed. (HL.New.HL32.3.2)
(June 30, 2014) Letter from Tim Maguire, President, Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE) Local 79 (HL.New.HL32.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/hl/comm/communicationfile-48435.pdf
(June 30, 2014) Submission from Scott Leon (HL.New.HL32.3.4)

Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 30

CD30.1 - Award - RFP 0612-14-0007 for the Supply, Installation and Operation of Snack and Hot and Cold Beverage Vending Services for Various Long-Term Care Homes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that: 

 

1.         City Council grant authority to negotiate and enter into a License Agreement with Imperial Vending Services Inc. being the highest scoring proponent meeting the requirements of Request for Proposal No. 0612-14-0007 for the Supply, Installation and Operation of snack and hot and cold beverage vending services for various long-term care homes for a two (2) year term commencing upon date of award to June 14, 2016, with an option to renew the agreement for up to three (3) separate, additional  one (1) year periods from June 15, 2016 until June 14, 2019.

 

2.         City Council authorize the public release of the information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 of this report following execution of the license agreement to Imperial Vending Services Inc.

Origin

(June 10, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide information on the results of the Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 0612-14-0007 for the Supply, Installation and Operation of snack and hot and cold beverage vending services for various long-term care homes and to request authority to negotiate and enter into a License Agreement with the recommended proponent, Imperial Vending Services Inc., being the highest scoring proponent, for a two (2) year term commencing upon date of award to June 14, 2016, with the option to renew the agreement for up to three (3) separate, additional one (1) year periods from June 15, 2016 to June 14, 2019. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Long-Term Care Homes and Services and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division on the Award - RFP 0612-14-0007 for the Supply, Installation and Operation of Snack and Hot and Cold Beverage Vending Services for Various Long-Term Care Homes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70315.pdf
(June 10, 2014) Confidential Attachment 1: Proposed Revenues for Long-Term Care Homes and Services

CD30.2 - Update on City Initiatives to Strengthen Neighbourhoods

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council delegate authority to the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to allocate the Council approved $300,000 in Community Funding for 2014 to support the four neighbourhoods that are transitioning from the Neighbourhood Improvement Area portfolio. 

 

2.         City Council approve one-time funding in the amount of $45,000 to support the stabilization of the Rexdale Community Hub in partnership with the Rexdale Community Health Centre as described in the body of this report.

 

3.         City Council delegate authority to the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to re-allocate 2014 Community Service Partnerships funds that are not used during the funding year by organizations to other Community Service Partnerships organizations.

 

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration Division

Summary

On April 1, 2014, City Council adopted the report, Toronto Strong Neighbourhood Strategy (TSNS) 2020 – Recommended Neighbourhood Improvement Areas. TSNS 2020 will work to advance equitable economic, social, health, environmental and participation outcomes in all neighbourhoods across Toronto, with a focus on 31 Neighbourhood Improvement Areas.  By partnering with residents, businesses and agencies, TSNS 2020 will strengthen neighbourhood wellbeing and deliver local impact for citywide change.

 

Council directed the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration Division to report back before the close of Council 2014 on the implementation process. 

 

This report:

 

-           Provides an update on Emerging Neighbourhoods Strategy and requests delegated authority to Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration Division to allocate transition funding in the emerging neighbourhoods in 2014;

 

-           Recommends one-time funding through the Community Services Partnership (CSP) Program to support the stabilization of the Rexdale Community Hub in partnership with the Rexdale Community Health Centre; and

 

-           Provides an update on the TSNS 2020 Partnership Opportunities Legacy (POL) Funding for 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration Division on the Update on City Initiatives to Strengthen Neighbourhoods
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70475.pdf

Speakers

Janet Sherbanowski
Donald Cameron, Treasurer, Crime Prevention Association of Toronto (CPAT)

CD30.4 - Progress on Master Lease Agreements and Update on the Early Learning and Care Assessment for Quality Improvement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive this report for information.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the General Manager of Children’s Services

Summary

This report responds to City Council's requests to report on the status of the master lease agreements between school boards and child care operators providing Full-Day Kindergarten before- and after-school programs. It also provides an update on the Early Learning and Care Assessment for Quality Improvement (ELCAQI), the renamed child care quality assessment tool, and confirms that no new concerns have arisen with respect to the Province of Ontario's modernization of child care initiative since the division's last report on this matter.

 

Children's Services has met with the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) to provide recommendations on the draft lease agreement, which concentrate on creating seamless environments for children based on strong partnerships between the different program operators. The Division does not have authority to negotiate lease agreements on behalf of third-party child care operators with the school boards but will continue to encourage seamless experiences for children.

 

The ELCAQI has undergone recent revisions which support best practices. Some changes to the assessment process have also been implemented in response to operators' feedback.  Specifically, a Corrected During Assessment (CDA) process has been introduced to allow operators to rectify certain items that were not initially observed during the assessment visit The assessment tool continues to be informative and helpful to parents whom are choosing child care, for staff as a training tool and Boards of Directors in informing strategic directions and priority investments.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the General Manager of Children’s Services on the Progress on Master Lease Agreements and Update on the Early Learning and Care Assessment for Quality Improvement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70376.pdf

Speakers

Jane Mercer, Toronto Coalition for Better Child Care
June Hall, Director, Main Square Day Care Centre

CD30.6 - Comprehensive Review of Cold Weather Protocols and Cold Weather Health Impacts in Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
To be considered with Item HL32.3

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the transfer of responsibility for co-ordinating Toronto’s cold weather alert and response program from Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to the Medical Officer of Health in time for the 2014-2015 cold weather season.

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to:

 

a.         Issue a Request for Expression of Interest (REOI) in 2014 to establish community interest in operating and/or co-ordinating 24-hour drop-in services during Extreme Cold Weather Alerts; and

 

b.         Prepare a report to Budget Committee during the 2015 Operating Budget process for their consideration on the results of the REOI, feasibility of the service, potential service delivery model(s) and estimated program costs and tax impacts;

 

3.         City Council request the Medical Officer of Health and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to develop:

 

a.         a minimum standard for cold weather drop-in service; and

 

b.         an enhanced communication strategy around cold alerts.

 

4.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to engage in a collaborative outreach effort with the co-ordinating agency of the Out of the Cold program to expand program sites for the 2014-15 season including a strategy for coordination and service provision in the inner-suburbs;

 

5.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration and the Chief Corporate Officer to investigate the use of a city-owned facility to provide 24-hour drop-in services during Extreme Cold Weather Alerts; and

 

6.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA), to include in SSHA's ten-year capital management and infrastructure strategy an analysis of the financial impact of delivering an additional 100 permanent shelter beds with the aim of returning flexibility to the shelter system to respond to unanticipated surges in occupancy levels.

Origin

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report reviews the temperature thresholds for issuing an Extreme Cold Weather Alert and whether any changes to the protocol are required. It also reports the findings of program reviews of the Metro Hall Warming Centre pilot project and the Out of the Cold program, and updates City Council on previous Council direction to open all 172 flex beds to relieve occupancy pressure in the shelter system.

 

In cold weather, hypothermia, frostbite, and trenchfoot can arise relatively quickly among homeless populations as a result of direct exposure to cold, with severe consequences including death. Emerging research now shows that cold weather also likely increases overall deaths and hospitalizations in Toronto, mainly due to cardiovascular and respiratory causes. Those most at risk among the general population are the elderly and people with pre-existing health concerns.

 

To protect homeless populations, Shelter Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) co-ordinates a suite of winter services including respite services such as drop-in centres that provide temporary escape from the cold, outreach services to connect with individuals on the street and check on their condition, and additional shelter beds. Currently, SSHA calls Extreme Cold Weather Alerts when the temperature reaches -15 °C or colder, or when other extreme winter weather conditions or circumstances warrant it, such as a severe snow storm. During an Alert, SSHA scales up street outreach, transit token availability and shelter access.

 

A new Cold Weather Plan co-ordinated by Toronto Public Health (rather than SSHA), with the Medical Officer of Health responsible for calling Extreme Cold Weather Alerts, will enable the full range of health impacts known to be associated with cold weather to be addressed and offers an ideal opportunity to review and update the criteria for calling Alerts. This transition aligns with practise across much of Ontario, is consistent with the City's approach to calling heat alerts, and provides an opportunity to engage City and community partners in a co-ordinated approach to cold weather messaging and response. As part of this plan, SSHA will maintain a leadership role in providing services to homeless populations.

 

The Metro Hall Warming Centre pilot and the Out of the Cold program are low barrier/low threshold programs that serve people living in precarious housing and a segment of homeless people at risk of exposure to extreme cold weather including those who do not regularly access other homeless support programs or services.  These programs provide a valuable service and should be continued.

 

The activated flex beds removed flexibility from the shelter system to respond to sudden demand surges and compromised Shelter, Support and Housing Administration's ability to respond to such surges in a timely fashion.  Flex beds should be returned to their original purpose, as soon as permanent shelter beds can be introduced to the system.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Medical Officer of Health and General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on the Comprehensive Review of Cold Weather Protocols and Cold Weather Health Impacts in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70510.pdf
(June 10, 2014) Attachment - Summary of Warming Centre Pilot Evaluation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70511.pdf

Speakers

Maggie Helwig, Church of St Stephen in the Fields
Reverend Andrea Budgey
Liisa Schofield, Ontario Coalition Against Poverty (OCAP)
John Spragge

CD30.8 - Update on Options for a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer/Questioning, and Two-Spirited (LGBTQ2S) Youth Focused Shelter or Transitional Housing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing to report back to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on August 14, 2014 on the feasibility of allocating 25 percent of shelter beds to Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer/Questioning, and Two-Spirited (LGBTQ2S) youth in an existing youth shelter facility with the request that the allocation be implemented in the fourth quarter of 2014;

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to ensure that Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer/Questioning, and Two-Spirited(LGBTQ2S) cultural competency, or anti-homophobia and anti-transphobia training be made mandatory for all shelter staff immediately, including maintenance, facilities, hospitality, and management staff;

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to issue a Request for Expression of Interest (REOI) in 2014 to explore community interest in operating an emergency shelter or transitional housing for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer/Questioning, and Two-Spirited (LGBTQ2S) youth experiencing homelessness; and

 

4.         City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to report to Budget Committee during the 2015 Operating Budget process on the results of the Request for Expression of Interest (REOI), feasibility of the service, and estimated program costs and tax impacts.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report provides an update on the work of City staff and community stakeholders to develop options to support LGBTQ2S (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer/Questioning, and Two-spirited) youth experiencing homelessness in Toronto. The report also contains recommendations on the future direction of this work.

 

Feedback received to date from stakeholders supports the need to create a standalone emergency shelter or transitional housing for LGBTQ2S youth.  In addition, ongoing work is needed to make the current emergency shelter system for both youth and adults more accessible and safe for LGBTQ2S communities.

 

Staff will continue to gather information and research on best practices in other jurisdictions with the aim of developing a service model which will meet the needs of LGBTQ2S homeless youth in Toronto.  Concurrently, staff will incorporate best practices into the development of new emergency shelter standards to be implemented in 2015.

 

Improving access and equity for specific client groups, including LGBTQ2S communities, is a strategic direction in the 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework adopted by City Council in 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on the Update on Options for a Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer/Questioning, Two-Spirited (LGBTQ2S) Youth Focused Shelter or Transitional Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70514.pdf

Speakers

Tanya Gulliver-Garcia, Canadian Observatory on Homelessness/Homeless Hub
Helen Kennedy and Mark Riczu, Egale Canada Human Rights Trust
Dr. Alex Abramovich and Teal-Rose Jaques
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(June 25, 2014) Letter from Tanya Gulliver-Garcia, Canadian Observatory on Homelessness/Homeless Hub (CD.New.CD30.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/comm/communicationfile-48415.pdf

CD30.9 - 2014 to 2016 Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI) Funding Allocations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) to enter into agreements and allocate, as community grants, up to $6,543,748 gross and $0 net from the 2015 and 2016 Provincial Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI), subject to approval of the 2015 and 2016 operating budgets, as follows:

 

a.         To increase the funding, and enter into an agreement with Daily Bread Food Bank Investment Drop-in Project for up to $300,000 gross and $0 net, as follows:

 

i.          from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 for up to $225,000 gross and $0 net as set out in Appendix A of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration; and

 

ii.          from January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2016 for up to $75,000 gross and $0 net as set out in Appendix A of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

 

b.         To extend the funding and enter into agreements with currently funded Drop-in  projects for up to $1,309,871 gross and $0 net, from April 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015 as set out in Appendix B of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration ;

 

c.         To extend the funding and enter into agreements with currently funded Supports to Daily Living (SDL) projects for up to $4,933,877 gross, and $0 net as follows:

 

i.          from April 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 for up to $3,700,408 gross and $0 net as set out in Appendix C of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration; and

 

ii.         from January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2016 for up to $1,233,469 gross, and $0 net as set out in Appendix C of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

 

2.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) to enter into an agreement with Margaret’s Housing and Community Support for the period June 1, 2014 to March 31, 2016 to deliver drop-in services, for up to $504,166 gross and $0 net subject to approval of the 2015 and  2016 City Operating Budgets as follows:

 

i.          from June 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 for up to $160,416 gross and $0 net as set out in Appendix D of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration;

 

ii.         from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 for up to $275,000 gross and $0 net as set out in Appendix D of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration; and

 

iii.         from January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2016 for up to $68,750 gross and $0 net as set out in Appendix D of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) to allocate community grants and enter into new agreements, with options to fund for up to five years, with the successful respondents to a Request for Proposal for Drop-in projects, starting October 1, 2015 for up to $705,000 gross and $0 net from the 2015 Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI) and up to $2,115,000 gross, and $0 net from the 2016 CHPI, subject to the approval of the 2015 and 2016 City Operating Budgets, and subsequent operating budgets.

 

4.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) to enter into service agreements and allocate funds up to $700,000 gross and $0 net from the 2015 and 2016 Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI) subject to approval of the 2015 and 2016 City Operating Budgets to:

 

a.         Enter into new agreements and amend existing agreements to respond to emerging issues and/or unexpected situations impacting the community, for an amount not to exceed $375,000 gross and $0 net as follows:

 

i.          from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 for up to $300,000 gross and $0 net; and

 

ii.          from January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2016 for up to $75,000 gross and $0 net.

 

b.         Provide funding for the 2015/16 Health and Safety Fund up to $250,000 gross and $0 net consistent with the terms set out in Appendix F of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, as follows:

 

i.          from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 for up to $200,000 gross and $0 net; and

 

ii.          from January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2016 for up to $50,000 gross and $0 net.

 

c.         Provide funding up to $75,000 gross and $0 net for 2015 Drop-in Appeals. This funding is to be used for appeals made to funding decisions resulting from the Drop-in Request for Proposal (RFP).  In the event that there are no appeals, or that less than $75,000 is required for appeals, the funds would be reallocated to the Health and Safety Fund (Recommendation 4b).

 

5.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) to extend an existing agreement for the period April 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015 with Neighbourhood Information Post (the lead community agency coordinating the Rent Bank Program in Toronto) to deliver the Toronto Rent Bank Program subject to the approval of the 2015 City Operating Budget as follows:

 

i.          from April 1, 2015 to September 30, 2015 for up to $741,624 gross and $0 net as set out in Appendix E of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

 

6.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) to award community grants consistent with the Toronto Community Grants Policy outlined in Appendix G of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report seeks authority to enter into or extend existing funding agreements with community agencies that help people to find and keep housing and increase housing stability.

 

All of the allocations for which authority is sought in this report are from the City's provincially funded Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI) allocation.

 

This report makes recommendations for $160,416 gross and $0 net of the 2014, $7,531,903 gross and $0 net of the 2015 and $3,617,219 gross and $0 net of the 2016 CHPI funding.  In total for the 2014, 2015, and 2016, budgets, allocation of$11,309,538 gross and $0 net in CHPI funds, is recommended. 

 

Funding for the 2014 allocation is available from the 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA).  Recommendations for funding in 2015 and 2016 are subject to the availability of CHPI funding in 2015 and 2016 Operating Budgets for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report and Appendices A-G from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on the 2014 to 2016 Community Homelessness Prevention Initiative (CHPI) Funding Allocations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70512.pdf

CD30.10 - Update on the Review of the Centralized Waiting List for Social Housing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to implement a choice based system for the selection of households for vacant rent-geared-to-income (RGI) units, such that the highest priority household will be selected for a vacant RGI unit from among the applicant households that express interest within a specified time period, after information about the vacant RGI unit has been made available to all eligible households;

 

2.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to revise Local Occupancy Standards for rent-geared-to-income (RGI) assistance as described in Appendix A of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration;

 

3.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to revise the social housing provider mandate policy as described in the attached Appendix B of the report (June 11, 2014) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration;

 

4.         City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to take steps to integrate the administration of access to rent-geared-to-income (RGI) housing with administration of other housing benefits and supports, and other income-tested human services by:

 

a.         developing an integrated service delivery model for intake and eligibility determination for RGI assistance, housing allowances  and other housing and related City-administered human services;

 

b.         transforming the centralized waiting list system into a multi-service housing registry as a component of the integrated human services delivery model;

 

c.         working with Toronto Community Housing to develop a transition plan for the integrated service delivery model that acknowledges and protects the interests of Toronto Community Housing staff, service partners, applicants and residents; and

 

5.         City Council request the Province to replace the Special Priority Housing Category with long-term funding for a specialized program to provide rent supplements and appropriate supports that better meet the housing needs of victims of domestic abuse.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

In April 2013, Council approved recommendations from the first phase of a review of the social housing waiting list system, including future directions for improving access to housing services in Toronto.

 

Over the past year, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) staff undertook the second phase of the review, including the following work completed in collaboration with City staff, Toronto Community Housing (TCH) and community partners:

 

-           Community consultations with applicants, service providers and the public.

-           A pilot choice based system, called "My Choice Rental," to improve access to rent-geared-to-income (RGI) housing.

-           Updates and changes to local rules for social housing, including occupancy standards, mandates and the method for ranking applications.

 

The recommendations in this report are intended to ensure that households in need are able to access available housing services in an efficient, transparent and equitable manner.

 

In addition to recommendations for the centralized waiting list for RGI assistance, this report provides a model for integrating access to a range of housing and related services in Toronto. This model will be implemented in coordination with related cross-divisional service initiatives and with the key actions identified in the 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework approved by Council in December 2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 11, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on the Update on the Review of the Centralized Waiting List for Social Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70513.pdf
Presentation on the Update on the Review of the Centralized Waiting List for Social Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70990.pdf

CD30.11 - Relocation of Cornerstone Place Shelter

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport, 21 - St. Paul's

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the permanent relocation of Cornerstone Place Shelter at 616 Vaughan Road, subject to:

 

a.         Cornerstone Place providing a business case that demonstrates the viability of the shelter's operations at the new location, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration; and

 

b.         a community meeting being conducted in accordance with the requirement of the Municipal Shelter By-law 138-2003.

Origin

(June 20, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

Cornerstone Place is a 50-bed men's purchase of service shelter located at 833 St. Clair Avenue West in Ward 21. The property has been sold to a developer and the shelter must vacate the facility in the very near future. The developer is working closely with Cornerstone, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA), and the local ward councillor to support the residents staying at the current site for as long as possible. A proposed new location has been identified at 616 Vaughan Road, in Ward 15, which requires Council approval in order to proceed.

 

If Council approves the new location for the shelter, SSHA will work in cooperation with the local ward councillor to conduct a community meeting for area residents to discuss the planned shelter location.

 

In order to ensure service continuity for the men at Cornerstone, Cornerstone Baptist Tabernacle has offered the use of space at 21 Blackthorn Avenue in Ward 17 as a temporary, emergency shelter site until the location at 616 Vaughan Road is ready for occupancy. SSHA staff support this interim solution. If this temporary site cannot be utilized, the residents of Cornerstone would be absorbed into the available beds within the rest of the men's shelter system and the staff at Cornerstone would likely have to be laid off until the new location is ready for occupancy.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 20, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on the Relocation of Cornerstone Place Shelter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-70948.pdf

Economic Development Committee - Meeting 32

ED32.6 - Newcomer Employment Initiatives in Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager of Toronto Employment and Social Services to provide an update on newcomer employment initiatives as part of the Workforce Development Strategy progress report, scheduled to be provided to the Economic Development Committee in April 2015.

Origin

(June 6, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Employment and Social Services

Summary

Toronto is one of the most multicultural urban areas in the world, with residents coming from 188 countries and speaking over 140 different languages. Over half of Toronto's residents are born outside Canada, making it an extremely diverse city. The successful settlement and integration of newcomers depends on a range of socio-economic factors. This report addresses one of these factors – supporting people to find jobs and integrate into the labour market – and outlines current approaches and programs the City is undertaking to support newcomers in Toronto's job market.

 

This report identifies areas where the City supports newcomers in the labour force, through partnerships with both governmental and community organizations, outlines three strategic frameworks that guide the City's work with newcomers and provides an overview of dominant issues facing newcomers in Toronto.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Employment and Social Services on Newcomer Employment Initiatives in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70343.pdf

ED32.7 - Loan of Durham Cathedral's Magna Carta and Forest Charter to Fort York National Historic Site

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve entering into a loan agreement with Durham Cathedral to bring its copies of the Magna Carta and the Forest Charter to Toronto to be exhibited at Fort York National Historic Site in fall 2015.

 

2.         City Council delegate signing authority to the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture for all matters relating to this loan.

 

3.         City Council approve Economic Development and Culture staff undertaking initial planning work in 2014 for the Magna Carta exhibition.

 

4.         City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to include a funding strategy for the 2015 components of the Magna Carta exhibition, with a net zero impact on the tax base, as part of the 2015 operating budget submission for the Economic Development and Culture Division.

Origin

(June 13, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The Magna Carta and the Forest Charter are foundational documents for rights, justice and governance in the Western world. To mark the 800th anniversary of the first signing of these documents, Magna Carta Canada has organized a travelling exhibition to bring Durham Cathedral's copies of the Magna Carta and the Forest Charter (dating from 1225) to Canada.

 

In Toronto, it is proposed that the exhibition be mounted in the new Visitor Centre at Fort York National Historic Site. The display of such significant documents - never seen before in this city - will highlight Fort York's new facility and its capability for hosting major exhibitions. It will also build new audiences there and throughout the City's museum system.

 

This report recommends that City Council approve entering into a loan agreement with Durham Cathedral to exhibit its copies of the Magna Carta and the Forest Charter at Fort York National Historic Site in 2015.

 

Council's approval of this loan is required because the insured value of the documents (about $36.5 million) exceeds the authority delegated to the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture for approving cultural matters ($100,000).

Background Information (Committee)

(June 13, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Loan of Durham Cathedral's Magna Carta and Forest Charter to Fort York National Historic Site
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70122.pdf

ED32.8 - Culture Build Investment Program - 2014 Allocations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the allocation of the state of good repair investment of $330,000.00 to the following organizations through the Culture Build Program:

 

Artists to Artists Foundation                                               

$65,000.00

Hot Docs        

     $25,000.00

Red Sky Performance

     $22,000.00

SKETCH

     $81,000.00

GBSP Centre Corp (Young Centre for the Performing Arts)

$15,100.00

Tafelmusik

$100,000.00

Toronto Dance Foundation

$21,900.00

Total:                                                                                  

$330,000.00

 

Origin

(June 10, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the 2014 Culture Build Investment Program allocations to seven non-city-owned not-for-profit cultural facilities. The total allocation of $330,000.00 for 2014 Culture Build Investment Program was approved by City Council as part of the Economic Development and Culture operating budget on January 29, 2014. 

 

The Culture Build Investment Program provides matching funds to assist the City's not-for-profit cultural sector with financing for state of good repair capital projects.  The arts and cultural organizations that are supported through the Culture Build Investment Program provide a wide variety of opportunities for Toronto residents to engage in the arts as participants, volunteers or audience members.  In its first eight years, the Culture Build Investment Program has helped bring 71 cultural facilities closer to a state of good repair.

 

The recommended allocations contained in this report are the result of a Peer Panel review of the applications received at the April 14, 2014 deadline according to established criteria. The administration of the review was carried out in accordance with the City of Toronto Grants Policy as adopted by City Council and effective April 2013.  

 

Based on feedback from last year's peer review panel,  Culture Build's eligibility criteria has been expanded to include a wider range of facilities with a  core cultural mandate,  and  to include funding for feasibility studies for projects that would meet the criteria.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Culture Build Investment Program - 2014 Allocations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70120.pdf

Speakers

Rudy Ruttimann, Executive Director, SKETCH
Jacklyn Thomas, CEO, Artists to Artists Foundation

ED32.9 - Strengthening Toronto's Urban Wood Industry

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to continue to work in partnership with industry, other City divisions and other levels of government to support the growth of the urban wood sector in Toronto.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to continue to work with private and public sector stakeholders to maximize the economic benefits of utilizing local salvaged wood from privately owned trees in Toronto.

Origin

(June 4, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

Toronto and region has a wood-using industry which employs an estimated 25,000 people.  Toronto is also one of Canada's design centers for both furniture and interior design.  Canada is the world's 4th largest exporter of furniture behind Italy, China and Germany.  Yet the wood that is used in Toronto by Toronto's wood industry comes, for the most part, from far afield.

 

Toronto has a small but vibrant cluster of companies which process Toronto trees on private property into products that are in high demand from local homeowners and commercial operations.  These firms and products are garnering world-wide attention.  There are over 200 firms employing about 1,000 workers in this cluster and they face a number of barriers – one of the most significant being the lack of awareness of their products and services.

 

Economic Development and Culture (EDC) staff efforts to strengthen the Toronto urban wood industry are focused on developing market awareness, creating networks and supply chains to connect established firms to new markets and to provide assistance in growing these companies.

 

Using local wood for economic opportunities, just as producing green energy locally and growing food locally, will keep dollars in the local economy and create new job opportunities in Toronto.  

 

This report briefly describes EDC's efforts to strengthen Toronto's urban wood industry.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 4, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Strengthening Toronto's Urban Wood Industry
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70330.pdf

Speakers

Mike Sharpe, Director, Design and Manufacture, Storyboard Furniture
Janet McKay, Executive Director, LEAF (Local Enhancement and Appreciation of Forests)
Sidney Gendon, Sawmill Sid
Lorant Tapaszi, Roca Wood Works Inc.

ED32.10 - Utilization Plans - Wood from the Maple Leaf Forever Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to continue to work with private and public sector partners to maximize the retention of the heritage and cultural value of the Maple Leaf Forever tree through appropriate uses of its wood.

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to report back with a final list of all projects which utilized the wood from the Maple Leaf Forever Tree and to provide the amount of funds raised to support urban forestry initiatives in Toronto.

Origin

(June 4, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The silver maple tree at 62 Laing Street, believed to be the inspiration for Alexander Muir's Maple Leaf Forever song written in 1867, was felled by a storm on July 19, 2013.

 

At the October 8, 2013 meeting of City Council, Economic Development and Culture (EDC) was directed to proceed with the utilization plans approved by Council and to report back on the allocation and use of the salvaged wood from this tree.

 

This report outlines the plans for the utilization of the wood from the Maple Leaf Forever (MLF) tree including plans for the exhibition and display of the products produced.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 4, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Utilization Plans - Wood from the Maple Leaf Forever Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70318.pdf
Attachment 2 - Project Outlines: Maple Leaf Forever Tree Wood Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70329.pdf

ED32.11 - Intention to Designate the Proposed Dufferin-Wingold Business Improvement Area (BIA)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the area described by Attachment No.1 to the report (May 21, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the Dufferin-Wingold Business Improvement Area under Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the City Clerk to send out a notice of City Council’s intention to pass a by-law designating the area described by Attachment No. 1 in this report as a Business Improvement Area (BIA), in accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

 

3.         City Council request the Executive Director of Technical Services to prepare designation by-law maps of the area as described by Attachment No. 1 in this report, and submit them to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(May 21, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report recommends that the City Clerk conduct a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to designate the area along Dufferin Street, between Wingold Avenue on the south and Lawrence Avenue on the north, as the Dufferin-Wingold Business Improvement Area (BIA).

 

Upon completion of the poll, the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture will report on the results to City Council through the Economic Development Committee.  Subject to a positive poll result, staff shall prepare the necessary by-laws and bills to give effect thereto.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 21, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Intention to Designate the Proposed Dufferin-Wingold Business Improvement Area (BIA)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70136.pdf

ED32.12 - Intention to Designate the Proposed Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.        City Council state its intention to designate the area described by Attachment No.1 to the report (May 6, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area under Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the City Clerk to send out a notice of City Council’s intention to pass a by-law designating the area described by Attachment No. 1 in this report as a Business Improvement Area (BIA), in accordance with Chapter 19 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.

 

3.         City Council request the Executive Director of Technical Services to prepare designation by-law maps of the area as described by Attachment No. 1 in this report, and submit them to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(May 6, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report recommends that the City Clerk conduct a poll to determine if there is sufficient support to designate the area along Yonge Street, between the Beltline Trail on the south and Soudan/Berwick Avenues on the north, as the Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA).

 

Upon completion of the poll, the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture will report on the results to City Council through the Economic Development Committee.  Subject to a positive poll result, staff shall prepare the necessary by-laws and bills to give effect thereto.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 6, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Intention to Designate the Proposed Midtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (BIA)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70133.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 23, 2014) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow (ED.New.ED32.12.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/comm/communicationfile-48394.pdf

ED32.13 - The Dupont Strip Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Name Change

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
20 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 665 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the renaming of the Dupont Strip Business Improvement Area, as defined by the boundaries described in Attachment No. 1 to the report (May 19, 2014) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to the Dupont by the Castle Business Improvement Area.

 

2.         City Council amend the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, as required to reflect the name change.

Origin

(May 19, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend that the name of the Dupont Strip Business Improvement Area be changed to the Dupont by the Castle Business Improvement Area.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 19, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Dupont Strip Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Name Change
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70129.pdf

ED32.15 - Small Business Roundtable Summary Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.         with respect to Taxes/Licenses:

 

a.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to work in consultation with the Chief Financial Officer to review the feasibility of continuing to further reduce the small business commercial property tax gap beyond 2020 to below the targeted 2.5 times residential property tax rate.

 

b.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to review and consider expanding the current initiative on regulatory changes to commercial and industrial properties in areas of rapid development be assessed at the current use rather than the highest and best use.

 

c.        City Council request the Province to eliminate the inequity in the business education tax rates between the City of Toronto and the surrounding region; and

 

d.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to develop, in conjunction with relevant Divisions, a strategy to simplify and streamline the City's business permitting processes by implementing on-line application and processing for required permits and licences.

 

2.         with respect to Promoting Innovation and Start-Ups:

 

a.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to explore the feasibility of conducting a quarterly Innovation Showcase whereby emerging start-ups in the City of Toronto can present pitches to invited guests that would be encouraged to help mentor, support and accelerate the connections for these start-up teams as they grow.

 

b.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to develop a terms of reference for a Small Business and Start-Up Innovation Council. The Council will act as a forum for discussion of new opportunities, the exchange of ideas and the development of small businesses and start-ups.

 

c.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, to submit in writing a request to Invest Toronto, that the agency seek out more start-ups from around the world in addition to attracting large enterprises.

 

3.         with respect to Collaboration and Communication with Small Business:

 

a.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to develop a terms of reference for a Small Business Advisory Council, comprised of City Councillors and small business owners and operators that is tasked with providing small businesses with advice, networking opportunities and addressing issues that small businesses regularly face.

 

b.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in collaboration with the Toronto Office of Partnerships and other relevant divisions, to develop and implement a communications strategy to ensure that small businesses are availing themselves of all of the services and opportunities that are open to them.

 

c.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in collaboration with relevant divisions, to pro-actively promote the fact that the City is interested in doing business with the small business sector and to communicate the various ways in which the sector may engage with the City.

 

d.        City Council direct the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in collaboration with the Purchasing and Materials Management Division and the Toronto Office of Partnerships, to proactively promote the fact that the City is interested in doing business with the small business sector.

Origin

(June 16, 2014) Letter from the Deputy Mayor Norm Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development and Culture Committee

Summary

A summary of the April 11, 2014 Small Business Roundtable Report with recommendations.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 16, 2014) Letter from Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly and Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair, Economic Development and Culture Committee on Re: Small Business Roundtable Report and Recommendations to Support Toronto's Small Businesses
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70685.pdf
Small Business Roundtable Summary Report - April 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-70672.pdf

Government Management Committee - Meeting 31

GM31.2 - Apportionment of Property Taxes - June 16, 2014 Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the apportionment of property taxes in the amounts identified in Appendix A to the report (May 22, 2014) from the Treasurer, under the columns entitled "Apportioned Tax" and "Apportioned Phase In/Capping".

Origin

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

The process of redistributing outstanding property taxes from one (1) parcel of land to many newly created properties following a severance or re-development of land is referred to as “the apportionment of taxes”.

 

This report deals with eight (8) tax apportionment applications made by the Treasurer or to the Treasurer by an owner of land pursuant to section 322 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, for the properties listed in Appendix A (attached).  

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting at which the applicants and / or property owners may express any concerns.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee. 

 

Staff  have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Apportionment of Property Taxes - June 16, 2014 Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69594.pdf
(May 22, 2014) Appendix A - Apportionment Report - Treasurer Initiated Tax Apportionments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69595.pdf

GM31.3 - Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - June 16, 2014 Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to Section 323 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as provided in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix A attached to the report (May 22, 2014) from the Treasurer, excluding the following application:

 

Appeal

Number

Ward

Number

 

Property Address

201300998

6

11 Lake Promenade

 

2.         City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to section 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping amounts) identified in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix B to the report (May 22, 2014) from the Treasurer.

Origin

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report deals with tax appeal applications made to the Treasurer pursuant to sections 323 and 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 (COTA).  Section 323 permits Council to cancel, reduce or refund taxes in cases when, during the year, a property undergoes changes such as when it is destroyed by fire or demolished, becomes exempt from taxation, or is reclassified due to a change in use.  Under section 325 of the COTA, taxpayers can request a cancellation, reduction or refund of taxes when an error in the assessment roll is identified which results in an overcharge.

 

The legislation requires Council to hold a public meeting where applicants may make a submission in defence of their position.  Council has delegated authority to hold such public meetings to the Government Management Committee.

 

Staff have mailed Notices of Hearing to affected taxpayers advising of the upcoming hearing before the Government Management Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes - June 16, 2014 Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69612.pdf
(May 22, 2014) Appendix A - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 323 of COTA, Hearing 2014H3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69613.pdf
(May 22, 2014) Appendix B - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 325 of COTA, Hearing 2014H3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69614.pdf

GM31.4 - Processes to Ensure that Developers Pay Property Taxes on New Condominium Developments Prior to Occupancy

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to provide the Revenue Services Division with a copy of the Notice of Approval of a Plan of Condominium and a Plan of Subdivision, to allow the Revenue Services Division to ascertain, prior to registration of the Condominium or Plan of Subdivision, whether there are arrears of property taxes or pending assessment or property tax appeals associated with the development, and to take any actions deemed appropriate.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

As requested by Government Management Committee, this report reviews the current processes that are in place to ensure that outstanding property taxes on new condominium developments are paid before the condominium units are occupied or conveyed. This is to ensure that new unit owners do not assume property tax liabilities that are the responsibility of the developer. The report also reviews if any additional processes or options are available to the City to better ensure that developers pay the property taxes associated with new condominium developments prior to occupancy.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Processes to Ensure that Developers Pay Property Taxes on New Condominium Developments Prior to Occupancy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69790.pdf

GM31.6 - Build Toronto Progress

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the Chief Corporate Officer consider on a case by case basis whether it is appropriate to recommend to Council that Build Toronto pay market value for any additional land requested by Build Toronto that is supplementary to or required to implement the development of a property by Build Toronto after Council initially approved terms for the transfer of the property to Build Toronto.

 

2.         City Council direct Build Toronto to provide a summary of the value created on the sale of each property closed during the year and on each project completed during the year within each Annual Report.

 

3.         City Council request the Deputy Mayor to write a letter to the Ontario Minister of Finance requesting the speedy passage of regulatory changes to Build Toronto, previously requested by the City of Toronto.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report is intended to address the request of Government Management Committee, at its meeting held on April 7, 2014, for a report on various matters related to the progress that Build Toronto has achieved.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Build Toronto Progress
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69957.pdf

GM31.8 - Division Designation on City-owned Vehicles

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Director of Fleet Services to install additional labeling with divisional names on required City Fleet vehicles at an estimated $165,000 in additional costs, as outlined in Option 2b in the report (June 2, 2014) from the Director, Fleet Services.

Origin

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Fleet Services

Summary

This report responds to City Council's direction (April 1-3, 2014), that the City Manager report on the feasibility of adding either permanent or temporary labeling on Fleet vehicles to indicate the division they represent.

 

The fundamental principle and objective of this report's recommendation is to maintain a recognizable and unified corporate identity for the City of Toronto vehicles in accordance with the City of Toronto Identity Policy and the City's Corporate Identity Program.

 

The research and analysis conducted by Fleet Services indicates that adding either permanent or temporary division designation labeling for Fleet vehicles would result in additional costs. It also indicates that this would add complexity to vehicle reassignments or sharing between divisions, reducing overall vehicle utilization and efficiency. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Fleet Services, on Division Designation on City-owned Vehicles
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70009.pdf

GM31.9 - Provision of Sole Source Professional Services from Microsoft Canada Inc. for Migration to Microsoft Exchange E-mail System

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Chief Information Officer to negotiate and execute a contract with Microsoft Canada Inc, for the provision of professional services to assist the City with its implementation of the Microsoft Exchange E-mail system, in the amount of $2,260,000.00 including all applicable taxes and charges; $2,035,200.00 net of HST recoveries, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the City Solicitor to review and amend processes and requirements in IT goods and services call documents and contracts to attract more qualified vendors to submit competitive responses in IT competitive calls and report to the Government Management Committee in the first quarter of 2015 with an update.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

This report seeks authority to enter into a sole source contract with Microsoft Canada Inc. to provide implementation services for the migration to the Microsoft Exchange E-mail system, in the amount not to exceed $2,035,200.00 net of HST recoveries.

 

The sole source is requested in order to meet the urgent timelines to replace the current E-mail system.  A Request for Proposal (RFP) #3405-13-3121 to select a proponent received only one proposal that met the minimum threshold. The successful proponent was subsequently disqualified during the negotiations process as they refused to meet a mandatory requirement of the RFP to provide a Letter of Credit to guarantee satisfactory performance.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Chief Information Officer and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Provision of Sole Source Professional Services from Microsoft Canada Inc. for Migration to Microsoft Exchange E-mail System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70038.pdf

GM31.10 - Approval to Initiate and Participate in Assessment Appeals

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Treasurer to proceed with the assessment appeals identified in Appendix A to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Treasurer.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Treasurer to participate in the assessment appeals initiated by property owners, as identified in Appendix B to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Treasurer, and any other appeals that may be subsequently identified by the Treasurer as warranting the City's active participation, including any motion, appeal of a decision or other adjudicative process that arises out of property and assessment matters, and approve the actions taken to date by Revenue Services and Legal Services staff in respect to these appeals.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Director of Revenue Services and/or his designate, in consultation with the City Solicitor, be granted standing authority to take all appropriate measures to deal with each of the appeals referred to in the report (May 29, 2014) from the Treasurer, including authority to discontinue or settle such appeals where it is concluded that it is reasonable to do so, to execute minutes of settlement or any other settlement agreement, to appeal any decision where warranted, to commence and pursue any warranted and related adjudicative proceeding such as a request for reconsideration, an application for Judicial Review, the stating of a case or any other proceeding like those referred to.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report identifies those properties where, as a result of staff review and analysis, the Director of Revenue Services has initiated assessment appeals at the Assessment Review Board (ARB) and is now seeking authorization to proceed with those appeals. The appeals are intended to correct assessments that have been incorrectly classified, under-valued, or wrongly returned on the supplementary/omitted assessment rolls provided to the City in 2013, or on the assessment roll for the 2014 taxation year. In addition, staff are requesting authorization to actively participate in various owner-initiated appeals in order to protect the City’s interests.

 

If the recommendations put forward in this report are adopted, Revenue Services and the City Solicitor's office will proceed to prepare the City's position on a case-by-case basis.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Approval to Initiate and Participate in Assessment Appeals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69946.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Appendix A - Appeals Initiated by the Treasurer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69943.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Appendix B - Property Owner Appeals for West Don Lands - City Participation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69944.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Appendix C - Summary of Criteria Approved by City Council in 2006
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69945.pdf

GM31.11 - 85 Ellesmere Road - Maryvale Branch Library - Designation of a Portion of Premises as a Municipal Capital Facility

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Bill 693 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council pass a by-law pursuant to section 252 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, providing authority to:

 

a.         enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with FCHT Holdings (Ontario) Corporation, the current owner of Parkway Mall at 85 Ellesmere Road, in respect of approximately 4,421 sq. ft. of the current leased space and 577 additional square feet of additional rentable area leased by the Toronto Public Library; and

 

b.         exempt the additional leased space (577 sq. ft.) from taxation for municipal and education purposes, for which the tax exemption is to be effective from the latest of the following dates: the commencement date of the lease; the date the municipal capital facility agreement is signed; or the date the tax exemption by-law is enacted.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Clerk to give written notice of the by-law to the Minister of Education, the Municipal Property Assessment Corporation, the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto Catholic District School Board, the Conseil Scolaire de District du Centre-Sud-Ouest, and the Conseil Scolaire de District du Catholique Centre-Sud.

 

3.         City Council grant authority for the introduction of the necessary bills to give effect thereto.

Origin

(May 23, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report seeks Council’s authority for the adoption of necessary by-laws to designate as a municipal capital facility the premises occupied by the Maryvale Branch Library located at 85 Ellesmere Road within the Parkway Mall, and to provide a property tax exemption for municipal and education purposes.  The municipal capital facility agreement will provide for a continued exemption for the space currently occupied by the library of approximately 4,421 square feet, and a new exemption for an additional 577 square feet of new space that is being leased by the library starting May 1, 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 23, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on 85 Ellesmere Road - Maryvale Branch Library - Designation of a Portion of Premises as a Municipal Capital Facility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69655.pdf

GM31.12 - Unpaid Property Taxes at 3500 Eglinton Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - York South-Weston

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. This report is about litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions.

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends:

 

1.         City Council receive the report (May 29, 2014) from the City Solicitor for information.

 

2.         City Council direct that the confidential information in Attachment 1 to the report (May 29, 2014) from the City Solicitor, remain confidential as it is subject to solicitor-client privilege and concerns litigation which affects the City.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide an update and information regarding the status of this matter, which first came before the Government Management Committee on February 24, 2014, and was considered by City Council on April 1, 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 29, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Unpaid Property Taxes at 3500 Eglinton Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69793.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Confidential Attachment 1 - Unpaid Property Taxes at 3500 Eglinton Avenue West

GM31.13 - Real Estate Acquisitions - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project (South of Steeles)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Director of Real Estate Services to negotiate to acquire and, if necessary, to initiate expropriation proceedings for temporary easements of up to two years over the Property detailed in Appendix "A" of the report (May 29, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer, for the construction of the Project.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Director of Real Estate Services to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the temporary easements, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearing that are received, to attend the hearing to present the City's position, to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for its consideration and to secure such court order(s) or take such other action as may be required to amend any procedural time lines where permitted pursuant to the applicable legislation.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

On February 7 and 8, 2011, by its adoption of Item CC3.4, City Council authorized the expropriation of portions of 3926-3932 Keele Street and 44-46 Romfield Drive as identified in Appendix "A" (the "Property") for the purposes of four year temporary construction easements to facilitate the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension (the "Project").

 

The TTC has now identified the need to extend the easements for up to an addition two year term.  To ensure construction scheduling and timelines for completion of the Project, this report seeks authority to negotiate to acquire temporary easements over the Property for up to an additional two year period and to initiate expropriation proceedings where necessary.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Real Estate Acquisitions - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension Project (South of Steeles)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70005.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Appendix A - Property Requirements Table and Site Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70034.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Appendix B1 - Expropriation Plan - 3926-3932 Keele Street and Appendix B2 - Expropriation Plan - 44-46 Romfield Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70036.pdf

GM31.15 - Amendment to Below-Market Rent Lease Agreement with For Youth Initiative at 1652 Keele Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - York South-Weston

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize an amendment to the existing Below-Market Rent lease agreement with For Youth Initiative ("FYI") to add approximately 246 square feet of additional space on the ground floor of the building located on the property known municipally as 1652 Keele Street, substantially based on the terms set out in the attached Appendix "A" of the report (June 2, 2014) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, with such revisions thereto and such other terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council grant an exemption from the Return on Investment (ROI) requirement as the tool is under development with Social Development, Finance and Administration Division.

Origin

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain authority to amend an existing Below-Market Rent ("BMR") lease with the tenant, For Youth Initiative, to include approximately 246 square feet of additional space within the building located at 1652 Keele Street.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, on Amendment to Below-Market Rent Lease Agreement with For Youth Initiative at 1652 Keele Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70042.pdf
(June 2, 2014) Appendix "A" - Major Terms and Conditions for 1652 Keele Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70043.pdf
(June 2, 2014) Location Map - 1652 Keele Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70044.pdf

GM31.18 - Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan - Actuarial Valuation Report as at December 31, 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Bill 662 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the "Actuarial Valuation Report as of December 31, 2013" (attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 23, 2014) from the Treasurer) prepared by Mercer Human Resource Consulting with respect to the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan.

 

2.         City Council approve, effective January 1, 2014, a total ad hoc cost-of-living increase of 1.94% in pension benefits to pensioners of the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan at an estimated total actuarial cost of $8.9 million on a solvency basis which will be borne by the Plan comprised on the following:

 

a.         a 0.94% increase effective January 1, 2014, based on the average of the Statistics Canada CPI over 2013; and

 

b.         a 1.0% increase effective January 1, 2014, based on the average of the Statistics Canada CPI over 2011, made as a catch-up payment as such an increase was not granted to pensioners at January 1, 2012 due to insufficient funds in the Indexation Reserve Account.  The plan now has sufficient funds to cover this increase and such a payment is allowable under the By-Law and the Pension Benefits Act.  The increase is effective January 1, 2014 and is not retroactive to prior years.

 

3.         By-law No. 15-92 of the former Metropolitan Corporation governing the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan as amended to date be further amended accordingly and authority be granted to introduce the necessary bill in Council.

Origin

(May 23, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report submits the Actuarial Valuation as at December 31, 2013 for the Toronto Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan (the Plan) and recommends a total cost-of-living increase of 1.94% to pensioners effective January 1, 2014.  The 2013 Valuation sets forth the financial position of the Plan for the year ended December 31, 2013 on both a going-concern and a solvency basis, and confirms that the Plan does not require any special payments by the City of Toronto.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 23, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan - Actuarial Valuation Report as at December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69596.pdf
(May 23, 2014) Attachment 1 - The Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan, Actuarial Valuation Report as of December 31, 2013 (March 2014)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69620.pdf

18a - Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan - Actuarial Valuation Report as at December 31, 2013

Origin
(April 30, 2014) Letter from the Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan
Summary

The Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan on April 30, 2014, considered a draft report (March 2014) from Anil Narale, Principal, Mercer, forwarding the Actuarial Valuation report for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2013 for the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan. 

Background Information (Committee)
(April 30, 2014) Letter from the Board of Trustees of the Metropolitan Toronto Pension Plan - Actuarial Valuation Report as at December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70020.pdf

GM31.19 - Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Plan - Actuarial Report as at December 31, 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Treasurer has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (GM31.19a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the "Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2013" (Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer) prepared by Mercer Human Resource Consulting with respect to the Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund (MTPBF).

 

2.         City Council approve the special contributions already made to the Fund in 2014 in the amount of $2.548 million, being equal to the 2013 wind-up shortfall, as the only statutorily required special contribution to the Fund in 2014, until such time as the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) requires, if it ever does, the City to take steps under the Pension Benefits Act (PBA) to eliminate the part of the $37.250 million solvency deficiency shown in the 2013 Actuarial Valuation which is in excess of the 2013 wind-up shortfall.

 

3.         In the event that FSCO directs that the City must take steps under the PBA to eliminate all of the $37.250 million smoothed solvency deficiency shown in the 2013 Actuarial Valuation, City Council:

 

a.         authorize the Treasurer to make a catch-up payment to the MTPBF, including interest, to cover the originally scheduled special contributions shown in Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer, from January 1, 2014 up to such date in 2014 on which the City may be so directed by FSCO, after allowing for the $2.548 million special contribution already made in 2014, to a maximum of $11.5 million, as long as the CRA has confirmed that such contributions will not constitute a breach of the ITA regulations;

 

b.         authorize the Treasurer to arrange for the issuance to the Fund's Board of Trustees of an  automatically renewing 1-year letter of credit in accordance with the Regulations under the PBA to cover the remainder of the special contributions as they would have come due to a maximum of $36.233 million, as per Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer;

 

c.         authorize the Treasurer to arrange for reduction in the face value of any such Letter of Credit to match any reduction in the smoothed solvency deficiency shown in any subsequent Actuarial Valuation of the MTPBF filed with FSCO;

 

d.         approve a Non-Program Operating Budget increase of $10,300 gross and $0 net funded from the Employee/Retiree Benefits Reserve Fund for $10,300 to cover the cost of the Letter of Credit in 2014.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report submits the Actuarial Valuation as at December 31, 2013 (Attachment 2), for the Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund (MTPBF).  The report requests funding from the Employee / Retiree Benefits Reserve Fund so that if the City receives a direction from the provincial pension regulator to continue making monthly contributions for the elimination of the smoothed solvency deficiency shown in the Valuation in accordance with Ontario pension legislation, the City will be able to:

 

a.          pay as of the date of the direction, a catch-up amount, including interest; and

 

b.         provide to the MTPBF's Board of Trustees,  a letter of credit from the City's banker instead of making the  remainder of those contributions. 

 

The 2013 Valuation sets forth the financial position of the Fund for the year ended December 31, 2013, and shows a funding excess of $17.7 million on a going-concern basis, a shortfall of $2.548 million on an unsmoothed solvency (wind-up) basis and a deficiency on a smoothed solvency basis (i.e., rolling 4-year averaging of net asset losses /gains) of $37.250 million.  The Valuation also provides an amortization schedule of special contributions for eliminating the solvency deficiency within the mandatory five (5) years.

 

The Valuation explains that the Province’s requirements for special contributions under the Pension Benefits Act (PBA) in the case of a solvency deficiency conflict with the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) interpretation of the regulations under the Income Tax Act  (ITA), which stipulate generally that special contributions cannot be made for shortfalls in excess of the wind-up deficiency, if any.

 

Given that the CRA and the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) which is responsible for compliance with the PBA, are apparently working on, but have not yet resolved the conflict, staff are seeking Council authority to deal with the Fund's shortfall on the basis of the contribution limitation under the ITA, but in the event that FSCO requires that the entire smoothed solvency deficiency under the PBA must form the basis of action by the City, a letter of credit be issued accordingly.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Plan - Actuarial Report as at December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69949.pdf
(May 30, 2014) Attachment 1 - Police Pension Plan 5-Year Amortized Special Payment/Line of Credit Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69947.pdf
(May 30, 2014) Attachment 2 - Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Fund, Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2013, (March 2014)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69948.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 7, 2014) Supplementary report from the Treasurer on Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Plan - Actuarial Report as at December 31, 2013 (GM31.19a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71275.pdf
Appendix A - 2013 Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Plan 5-Year Amortized Special Payment/Letter of Credit (LOC) Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71268.pdf
Appendix B - 2012 Metropolitan Toronto Police Benefit Plan 5-Year Amortized Special Payment/Letter of Credit (LOC) Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71276.pdf

GM31.20 - Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund - Actuarial Report as at December 31, 2013

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the “Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2013” (Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer) prepared by Buck Consultants with respect to the Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund.

 

2.         City Council approve the deferral of any special payments to the Fire Fund given the windup surplus of the Plan, until such time as the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) requires, if it ever does, the City to take steps under the Pension Benefits Act (PBA) to eliminate the $4.978 million solvency deficiency shown in the 2013 Actuarial Valuation.

 

3.         In the event that FSCO directs that the City must take steps under the PBA to eliminate the $4.978 million smoothed solvency deficiency shown in the 2013 Actuarial Valuation, City Council:

 

a.         authorize the Treasurer to make a catch-up payment to the Plan, including interest, to cover the originally scheduled special contributions shown in Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer, from January 1, 2014 up to such date in 2014 on which the City may be so directed by FSCO, to a maximum of $1.1 million, as long as the CRA has confirmed that such contributions will not constitute a breach of the ITA regulations;

 

b.         authorize the Treasurer to arrange for the issuance to the Fund`s Benefit Fund Committee of an automatically renewing 1-year letter of credit in accordance with the Regulations under the PBA to cover the remainder of the special contributions as they would have come due to a maximum of $5.294 million, as per Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer;

 

c.         authorize the Treasurer to arrange for reduction in the face value of any such Letter of Credit to match any reduction in the smoothed solvency deficiency shown in any subsequent Actuarial Valuation of the Plan filed with FSCO; and

 

d.         approve a Non-Program Operating Budget increase of $795 gross and $0 net funded from the Employee/Retiree Benefits Reserve Fund for $795 to cover the annual cost of the Letter of Credit.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report submits the Actuarial Valuation as at December 31, 2013 (Attachment 2), for the Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund (the "Fire Fund"). The report requests funding from the Employee/Retiree Benefits Reserve Fund so that if the City receives a direction from the provincial pension regulator to commence making monthly contributions for the elimination of the smoothed solvency deficiency shown in the Valuation in accordance with Ontario pension legislation, the City will be able to:

 

a.          pay as of the date of the direction, a catch-up amount, including interest; and

 

b.         provide to the Fund`s Benefit Fund Committee, a letter of credit from the City's banker instead of making any further contributions.

 

The 2013 Valuation sets forth the financial position of the Plan for the year ended December 31, 2013, and shows a funding excess of $9.452 million on a going-concern basis, a surplus of $11.0 million on an unsmoothed solvency (wind-up) basis, and a deficiency on a smoothed solvency basis (i.e., rolling 4-year averaging of net asset losses/ gains) of $4.978 million. The Valuation also provides an amortization schedule of special contributions for eliminating the solvency deficiency within the mandatory five (5) years.

 

The Valuation explains that the Province’s requirements for special contributions under the Pension Benefits Act (PBA) in the case of a solvency deficiency conflict with the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) interpretation of the regulations under the Income Tax Act  (ITA), which stipulate generally that special contributions cannot be made for shortfalls in excess of the wind-up deficiency, if any.

 

Given that the CRA and the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) which is responsible for compliance with the PBA, are apparently working on, but have not yet resolved the conflict, staff are seeking Council authority to deal with the Fund's shortfall on the basis of the contribution limitation under the ITA, but in the event that FSCO requires that the entire smoothed solvency deficiency under the PBA must form the basis of action by the City, a letter of credit be issued accordingly.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Treasurer on Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund - Actuarial Report as at December 31, 2013
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69940.pdf
(May 30, 2014) Attachment 1 - Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund 5-Year Amortized Special Payment/Line of Credit (LOC) Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69941.pdf
(May 30, 2014) Attachment 2 - Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund, Actuarial Valuation Report as of December 31, 2013 (April 2014)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69942.pdf

GM31.21 - Actuarial Valuation Report of the Corporation of the City of York Employees' Pension Plan (York)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the “Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2013” (Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer) prepared by Mercer Human Resource Consulting with respect to the City of York Employees' Pension Plan ("the Plan").

 

2.         City Council approve the special contributions already made to the Fund in 2014 in the amount of $0.018 million (which was based on the special payment schedule approved from the December 31, 2010 Valuation), until such time as the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) requires, if it ever does, the City to take steps under the Pension Benefits Act (PBA) to eliminate the part of the $2.929 million solvency deficiency shown in the 2013 Actuarial Valuation which is in excess of the contributions already made.

 

3.         In the event that FSCO directs that the City must take steps under the PBA to eliminate all of the $2.929 million smoothed solvency deficiency shown in the 2013 Actuarial Valuation, City Council:

 

a.         authorize the Treasurer to make a catch-up payment to the Plan, including interest, to cover the originally scheduled special contributions shown in Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer, from January 1, 2014 up to such date in 2014 on which the City may be so directed by FSCO, after allowing for the $0.018 million special contribution already made in 2014, to a maximum of $1.0 million, as long as the CRA has confirmed that such contributions will not constitute a breach of the ITA regulations;

 

b.         authorize the Treasurer to arrange for the issuance to the York Pension Employees' Pension and Benefit Committee of an automatically renewing 1-year letter of credit in accordance with the Regulations under the PBA to cover the remainder of the special contributions as they would have come due to a maximum of $2.887 million, as per Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Treasurer;

 

c.         authorize the Treasurer to arrange for reduction in the face value of any such Letter of Credit to match any reduction in the smoothed solvency deficiency shown in any subsequent Actuarial Valuation of the Plan filed with FSCO; and

 

d.         approve a Non-Program Operating Budget increase of $758.00 gross and $0 net funded from the Employee/Retiree Benefits Reserve Fund for $758.00 to cover the cost of the Letter of Credit in 2014.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Treasurer

Summary

This report submits the Actuarial Valuation as at December 31, 2013 (Attachment 2), for the City of York Employees' Pension Plan ("the York Pension Plan"). The report requests funding from the Employee/Retiree Benefits Reserve Fund so that if the City receives a direction from the provincial pension regulator to continue making monthly contributions for the elimination of the smoothed solvency deficiency shown in the Valuation in accordance with Ontario pension legislation (which were suspended in May, 2014 for conformity with CRA requirements) the City will be able to:

 

a.         pay as of the date of the direction, a catch-up amount, including interest; and

 

b.         provide to the York Pension Employees' Pension and Benefit Committee, a letter of credit from the City's banker instead of making the remainder of those contributions.

 

The 2013 Valuation sets forth the financial position of the Fund for the year ended December 31, 2013, and shows a funding excess of $0.281 million on a going-concern basis, a surplus of $ 0.426 million on an unsmoothed solvency (wind-up) basis and a deficiency on a smoothed solvency basis (i.e., rolling 4-year averaging of net asset losses / gains) of $2.929 million.   The Valuation also provides an amortization schedule of special contributions for eliminating the solvency deficiency within the mandatory five (5) years.

 

The Valuation explains that the Province’s requirements for special contributions under the Pension Benefits Act (PBA) in the case of a solvency deficiency conflict with the Canada Revenue Agency’s (CRA) interpretation of the regulations under the Income Tax Act  (ITA), which stipulate generally that special contributions cannot be made for shortfalls in excess of the wind-up deficiency, if any.

 

Given that the CRA and the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO) which is responsible for compliance with the PBA, are apparently working on, but have not yet resolved the conflict, staff are seeking Council authority to deal with the Fund's shortfall on the basis of the contribution limitation under the ITA, but in the event that FSCO requires that the entire smoothed solvency deficiency under the PBA must form the basis of action by the City, a letter of credit be issued accordingly.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Treasure on Actuarial Valuation Report of the Corporation of the City of York Employees' Pension Plan (York)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69933.pdf
(May 30, 2014) Attachment 1 - The Corporation of the City of York Employees' Pension Plan 5-Year Amortized Special Payment/Line of Credit (LOC) Schedule
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69913.pdf
(May 30, 2014) Attachment 2 - The Corporation of the City of York Employees' Pension Plan, Report on the Actuarial Valuation for Funding Purposes as at December 31, 2013 (March 2014)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-69914.pdf

GM31.24 - Expropriation of 49 Sheppard Avenue East, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 Bonnington Place for the North York City Centre Service Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to initiate the expropriation process for the taking of the properties know as 49 Sheppard Avenue East, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 Bonnington Place in the event that an offer to sell ( agreement) cannot be reached.

 

2.         City Council grant authority to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the properties known as 49 Sheppard Avenue East, 4, 6, 8 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 Bonnington Place and to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearing that are received, to attend the hearing to present the City's position and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to City Council for its consideration.

 

3.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(June 3, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report seeks authority to commence expropriation proceedings for the properties municipally known as 49 Sheppard Avenue East, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and24 Bonnington Place. These properties are required to further complete the southern portion of North York City Centre Service Road (“NYSR”).

 

Negotiations with the owners of these properties have been ongoing since January 2010. The negotiations thus far have led staff to conclude that terms of an agreement to acquire these properties by means of a negotiated settlement may jeopardize the construction schedule for the "NYSR". In order to avoid further delay in acquiring these lands, expropriation is necessary. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2014) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer on Expropriation of 49 Sheppard Avenue East, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22 and 24 Bonnington Place for the North York City Centre Service Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-70375.pdf

Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 28

PE28.1 - Legacy Usage of the West Channel 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games Venue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council restrict the hosting of motorboat-towed competitions and events within the West Channel to a combined total maximum of 10 days per calendar year, including all days which interrupt public use, so as to ensure access to and quiet enjoyment of the surrounding parkland by residents.

Origin

(December 9, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division

Summary

This report outlines concrete ways of ensuing legacy use of the most recent 2015 Pan and Parapan American Games (“2015 Games”) capital project approved by Council.

 

In May 2013, the City received an official request from the Toronto Organizing Committee for the 2015 Pan and Parapan American Games (“TO2015”) to use the waterways between Ontario Place and Marilyn Bell Park (the “West Channel”) to host Wakeboard and Water Ski, Open Water Swimming and the swim segment of the Triathlon during the 2015 Games.  Certain capital works must be completed to the waterways to meet international competition standards (the “West Channel Project”).

 

In July 2013, Council granted authority to the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to create a new capital project called West Channel and to direct $2.42 million of the Toronto Pan Am Sport Centre (“TPASC”) budget savings to fund the new West Channel Project.  In that same meeting, Council directed the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report back on the increased activity and programming that can be accommodated as a result of the planned improvements to the West Channel.

 

Although there are a number of factors limiting motorsport training and competition in the West Channel, the improvements to the Channel will allow the sports of Water Ski and Wakeboard (“WSW”) to host approximately two elite level boat-towed competitions per year, including regional, national and adaptive amateur events, totaling a maximum of 10 days.  This increased use would begin in the 2016 season.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 9, 2013) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, on the Legacy Usage of the West Channel 2015 Pan/Parapan American Games Venue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-67366.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(January 15, 2014) E-mail from Judy Sutcliffe (PE.Main.PE28.1.1)

PE28.4 - Toronto's 2012 Greenhouse Gas and Air Quality Pollutant Emissions Inventory

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Director of the Environment and Energy Division to collaborate with relevant City Divisions, the Toronto Atmospheric Fund, Toronto Hydro and Enbridge Gas to identify and implement actions that address the following technical recommendations made by the project consultants (Canadian Urban Institute and Halsall Associates):

 

a.         Improve the accuracy of the City’s building data file to address the issue that a significant percentage (28 percent) of the buildings gross floor area is not classified and, therefore, a significant percentage (34 percent) of the City's total electricity consumption is unassigned;

 

b.         Improve the accuracy of the City’s estimates of emissions from transportation sources by surveying what car and truck types, and in what numbers, use the highways and roads in Toronto;

 

c.         Identify, in partnership with Enbridge Gas and Toronto Hydro, ways to address data privacy issues, so that more detailed and accurate information can be provided to the City;

 

d.         Standardize the building classification and aggregating schemes between the City and the energy utilities;

 

e.         Identify and estimate forecast electricity demand to support the identification of the geographic areas or sectors where the City and the utilities may wish to focus their energy conservation and emission reduction programming;

 

f.          Include both weather normalized and actual natural gas consumption and emissions in future annual greenhouse gas and air quality inventory staff updates;

 

g.         Collaborate with Transportation Services to develop a strategy for updating estimated community transportation emissions at least once every two years using high quality, Toronto specific data; and

 

h.         Develop a strategy for tracking waste related greenhouse gas emissions from privately collected waste generated in the City of Toronto.

 

2.         City Council direct the Director of the Environment and Energy Division to:

 

a.         Publish future annual greenhouse gas and air quality inventories in the fourth quarter of the year and to include utility consumption trends in the absence of applicable emission factors for the most recent years and that copies of these documents be shared with Toronto Public Health; and

 

b.         Supplement the annual greenhouse gas and air quality inventory staff updates with more detailed, professionally written and illustrated Greenhouse Gas and Air Quality Inventory Reports, prepared in collaboration with relevant City Divisions, utilities, Toronto Atmospheric Fund, and external experts, not less than once every four years.

 

3.         City Council direct the Director of the Environment and Energy Division to:

 

a.         Explore opportunities to partner with other municipalities and the Province, as well as other relevant organizations to advocate for improved vehicle emission standards that will result in improved air quality in Toronto and all Canadian cities;

 

b.         Request the Federal Minister of Natural Resources implement amendments 13 and 14 to Canada’s Energy Efficiency Regulations , which will result in reduced energy use and greenhouse gas emission in Toronto and all Canadian cities; and

 

c.         Advance, in the context of the Ontario Energy Board’s current consultative process, the adoption of new Demand-Side Management guidelines that will ensure targets and budgets to secure all cost-effective natural gas conservation in the City of Toronto.

Origin

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report provides an update on the City's progress towards meeting the greenhouse gas and air quality pollutants reduction targets adopted by City Council in the 2007 report entitled, Climate Change, Clean Air and Sustainable Energy Action Plan: Moving from Framework to Action (the "Climate Change Action Plan") by reporting on estimated levels of emissions for 2012. 

 

The information presented in this report is based on electricity and natural gas consumption, as well as, solid waste production in 2012, but there is no new data since 2008 respecting community transportation available for analysis.  In addition, this report updates the previous report regarding emission levels in 2011 based on more recent information from Environment Canada.

 

Results show that greenhouse gas emissions in 2012 compared to 1990 levels were 49 percent lower for the City Government and 25 percent lower for the City Community. These results show that Toronto has exceeded its 2012 target of a 6 percent reduction from 1990 greenhouse gas levels.  Air quality pollutant emissions, however, in 2012 were only 2.8 percent lower than the 2004 benchmark set by City Council in 2007, which is below the target of a 20 percent reduction in locally generated air pollutants by 2012. The majority of the locally generated air pollutant emissions (80.5 percent) in Toronto are from road vehicles: 35.5 percent are from cars and light trucks, 7 percent are from heavy gasoline trucks and 38 percent are from heavy diesel trucks.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Toronto's 2012 Greenhouse Gas and Air Quality Pollutant Emissions Inventory
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-70321.pdf

Speakers

Bryan Purcell, Program Director, Toronto Atmospheric Fund

Communications (Committee)

(June 23, 2014) Letter from Bryan Purcell, Program Director, Toronto Atmospheric Fund (PE.New.PE28.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/comm/communicationfile-48380.pdf
(June 23, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (PE.New.PE28.4.2)
(June 23, 2014) Submission from Bryan Purcell, Program Director, Toronto Atmospheric Fund, attaching a revised Appendix to his letter (PE.New.PE28.4.3)

PE28.5 - Corporate Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan (2014-2019) - Green Energy Act - Regulation 397/11

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council agree that the Energy Conservation and Demand Management (ECDM) Plan outlined in Appendix 'A' to the report (June 9, 2014) from the Director, Environment and Energy, will be used as the foundation for developing energy conservation and demand management projects in City facilities for the next five years.

 

2.         City Council direct the Director, Environment and Energy to continue leading the projects associated with the City's Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan and assist the City's Agencies, Boards, Commissions and Divisions in the achievement of proposed targets.

 

3.         City Council request that the City's Agencies, Board, Commissions and Divisions actively participate in further identification and implementation of energy conservation and demand management projects.

 

4.         City Council request that all City staff, Councillors and Councillors' staff be required to turn off their computer monitors and office lights at the end of the day when they leave their offices to help reduce the electricity consumption.

Origin

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Director, Environment and Energy Division

Summary

The Government of Ontario enacted the Green Energy Act Regulation 397/11 on January 1, 2012. This legislation requires the City of Toronto to develop and publish a five-year Energy Conservation and Demand Management (ECDM) plan by July 1, 2014. The regulation requires senior management approval of the plan prior to publication. For the past year, the Energy and Waste Management Office within the Environment and Energy Division has been leading efforts to complete this plan and report.

 

The City of Toronto has a large quantity of facilities under its internal portfolio of buildings and operations. Accordingly, a benchmarking approach to classify opportunities and prioritize future projects was adopted for the development of the ECDM plan. The report is comprised of various building types related to individual divisions. Where sensible, facilities with similar operations under multiple divisions were grouped. Comparison of energy consumption enabled this analysis to estimate energy savings based on potential operational improvements and equipment retrofits to achieve top quartile performance in each building type category. The analysis projects opportunities to cut facility energy consumption by approximately 30 per cent resulting in annual cost savings of over $17 Million with an average payback period of less than 8 years.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Director, Environment and Energy, on Corporate Energy Conservation and Demand Management Plan (2014-2019) - Green Energy Act - Regulation 397/11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-70326.pdf
(June 9, 2014) Appendix A - Executive Summary - Energy Conservation and Demand Management (ECDM) Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-70670.pdf

PE28.6 - Resilient City - Preparing for a Changing Climate

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the "Climate Change Risk Management Policy", as outlined in Appendix A of the report (June 9, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, which establishes the necessary processes and controls for systematically identifying, assessing and taking action to mitigate risks arising from a changing climate and defines roles and responsibilities.

 

2.         City Council require all City Agencies and request all City Corporations to adopt the City's Climate Change Risk Management Policy or a similar policy that is consistent with the one adopted by City Council and advise the Chief Corporate Officer when such policy has been adopted.

 

3.         City Council request the Province of Ontario and the Government of Canada to prioritize the health and safety of residents resulting from a changing climate and extreme weather, with attention to the particular needs of large cities as a result of their density and the age of infrastructure, and the need for intergovernmental coordination among all governments, including municipalities; and direct the City Manager to continue to work with provincial and federal officials, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and key municipal stakeholders to advance this intergovernmental priority.

 

4.         City Council direct the Chief Corporate Officer in collaboration with the Executive Environment Team members to:

 

a.         establish a process to manage across City Divisions and Agencies the interdependencies of infrastructure and services identified as being at risk to a changing climate; and

 

b.         to explore partnership opportunities with the private sector and broader public sector, such as telecommunication, private utility, healthcare, banking and insurance, in the implementation of collective action that increases Toronto’s resilience to a changing climate and extreme weather.

 

5.         City Council direct the Director of the Environment and Energy Division to:

 

a.         lead the City’s efforts to monitor and research how the climate is changing and when new information relevant to the City of Toronto becomes available, provide this to City Council, the City Manager, the Deputy City Managers and all Division Heads;

 

b.         assist, where necessary, City Divisions and Agencies in undertaking climate change and extreme weather risk assessments of their operations and the identification of actions that could be taken to mitigate those risks;

 

c.         coordinate annual reporting to City Council on the implementation of the “Climate Change Risk Management Policy” with the first report to be presented in the first quarter of 2016; and

 

d.         collaborate with the Director of Strategic Communications and all relevant City Divisions, Agencies and Corporations, to establish a corporate-wide integrated approach to communicating, educating and engaging residents and businesses about the resources and supports available to them and the actions they can take to increase their resilience to a changing climate and extreme weather.

 

6.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer to prepare a business case for consideration during the 2015 budget process and beyond that provides resources required to support implementation of the Climate Change Risk Assessment Policy.

 

7.         City Council endorse the proposed letter of understanding, as outlined in Appendix C of the report (June 9, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, between the City of Toronto and Toronto Hydro for Collaborative Energy Planning.

 

8.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Corporate Officer to identify proposals for consideration during the 2015 budget process and beyond for financing required increases in the electrical standby capacity in critical City-owned buildings operated by Facilities Management.

 

9.         City Council authorize the Director of the Environment and Energy Division the option to provide access to the Toronto Climate Risk Assessment Tool to the private sector and broader public sector at no financial cost and with the discretion to dispense with an indemnity.

Origin

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The success of Toronto and its quality of life will be influenced by how resilient the City of Toronto, its residents and businesses are to the direct and indirect effects of a changing climate and associated extreme weather events.

 

Recent events, such as the July 8, 2013 rain storm, the many extreme heat alerts during the summer of 2013 and the December 2013 ice storm offer a number of lessons that identify the need to set a course of action that will help the City and its communities prepare for future eventualities and become more resilient to a changing climate. Toronto already has strategies and initiatives such as the Toronto Green Standard, Wet Weather Flow Master Plan, the Hot Weather Response Plan and the Strategic Forest Management Plan that are building up Toronto’s resilience, but more work is required to:

 

1.         support the integration of  climate change resilience into decision making across all City operations;

 

2.         further identify the changes required in Toronto's services and infrastructure to make them more resilient;

 

3.         establish approaches for coordinating resilience action according to identified  interdependencies of infrastructure and services and priority populations;

 

4.         seek the engagement and assistance of the federal and provincial governments to address the impacts of the changing climate on the health and safety of residents;

 

5.         partner with the private sector and broader public sector to coordinate the City's efforts with them to improve Toronto's overall resilience; and

 

6.         support residents and businesses in taking actions that enhance their personal resilience.

 

The purpose of this report is to outline an approach that will see climate change resilience integrated into decision-making and co-ordination of City operations and services. This report proposes a Climate Change Risk Management Policy that defines roles and responsibilities for identifying and mitigating climate risks and proposes mechanisms for co-ordinating, resourcing and prioritizing actions. In addition, this report responds to the climate resilience directives made by City Council when it discussed how the City responded to the December 2013 ice storm.

 

It is important to note that this report focuses on improving Toronto's climate change resilience, while other reports being prepared by the City Manager and the Medical Officer of Health for presentation at the July 8, 2014 meeting of City Council address issues associated with being prepared for emergency events that occur as a result of extreme weather.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 9, 2014) Report and Appendices A to C from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, on Resilient City - Preparing for a Changing Climate
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-70623.pdf

Speakers

Rita Bijons, Creating Resilient Extreme Weather (CREW)
Gabriella Kalapos, Clean Air Partnership
Lucy Cummings, Executive Director, Faith and the Common Good

Communications (Committee)

(June 20, 2014) Letter from Grant Humes, Executive Director, Toronto Financial District Business Improvement Area (PE.New.PE28.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/comm/communicationfile-48371.pdf
(June 23, 2014) E-mail from Bala Gnanam, Director, Sustainability and Building Technologies, BOMA Toronto (PE.New.PE28.6.2)
(June 23, 2014) Letter from Lucy Cummings, Executive Director, Faith and the Common Good (PE.New.PE28.6.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pe/comm/communicationfile-48355.pdf

Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 34

PG34.1 - Eglinton Connects Planning Study - Phase 1 (Part 1) Implementation Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 17 - Davenport, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 25 - Don Valley West, 26 - Don Valley West, 34 - Don Valley East, 35 - Scarborough Southwest, 37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Communications PG34.1.26 to PG34.1.75 have been submitted on this Item

Bill 720 has been submitted on this Item.

Will be considered at 11:00 am on Friday July 11.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         Attachment 2 of the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning be amended by:

 

a.         adding the map submitted by Councillor Colle to identify the "subject lands" in Part 2; and

 

b.         amending Part 5 to read: "Chapter 7, Map 28 Site Area Specific Policy No. 31, is replaced as follows:"

 

2.         City Council adopt the Official Plan Amendments as listed in Attachment 2 of the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1;

 

3.         City Council direct that private and public redevelopment along Eglinton Avenue be required to provide the approved Streetscape Plan features in the boulevard in front of the development property, public lanes in the rear, dedications for widening of the right-of-way and publicly-accessible setbacks, as shown in the Plan, and that such features be secured through appropriate agreements or permits;

 

4.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and City Solicitor to request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing or the Ontario Municipal Board, through a modification of Official Plan Amendment 231, to implement an amendment to the Official Plan for the southern 100 metres of the lands at 3500 Eglinton Avenue West (former Kodak lands) as follows: redesignate on Map 17 (Land Use Plan) of the Official Plan the area shown on Attachment 4 of the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning  from Employment Areas to Special Study Areas; and

 

5.         City Council direct the City Clerk to give notice of a Statutory Public Meeting to be held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee on August 7, 2014 to consider the Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments and other planning instruments and measures referred to in the Recommendations.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.         Directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report back to the August 7, 2014, meeting of Planning and Growth Management Committee with the Phase 1 Zoning By-law Amendments and any further Official Plan Amendments.

Origin

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

Over the last two years, the Eglinton Connects Planning Study examined the future land uses, built form, public realm and road layout on Eglinton Avenue, in anticipation of the opening of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT in 2020.  Together with various stakeholders and the community, a vision for the intensification of Eglinton Avenue was developed.  The study resulted in a Plan with 21 recommendations, which were adopted by City Council in May 2014, along with direction to consult further on initial implementation measures.

 

The purpose of this report is to recommend the adoption of some initial implementation measures for the 21 study recommendations endorsed by Council, and to report back on the results of three community meetings held in May 2014.  This report proposes that the Phase 1 implementation measures would be adopted in two parts: Part 1 includes Official Plan Amendments (OPAs) and two Council Resolutions, while Part 2 will include amendments to the Zoning By-law and other implementation measures.

 

This report recommends implementation of OPAs to facilitate the intensification of the corridor in accordance with the Plan.  Changes to land use designations are recommended in certain areas to encourage lot consolidation and redevelopment or to recognize existing uses.  A pilot project to demonstrate the implementation of a Neighbourhood Transition Area is proposed on one block.  In Leaside, an OPA to permit townhouses on one block is proposed.  Site and Area Specific Policies are proposed to secure the dedication of rear laneways as new development occurs.  Site and Area Specific Policies are also proposed to guide the development of the Bayview, Dufferin and West Side Mall Focus Areas with respect to building massing, transportation connections, open space, and community facilities.  Finally, two Resolutions are recommended to implement the Streetscape Plan and to adopt a Special Study Areas designation in part of the Mount Dennis area.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 22, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Eglinton Connects Planning Study - Phase 1 (Part 1) Implementation Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70189.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70297.pdf
(June 16, 2014) Map from Councillor Colle
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70935.pdf

Speakers

Jane Steele Moore
Martin Wasserman
Lindsay Lorimer
Geoff Kettel, Co-President, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated
Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto
Joseph Guzzi, Representing the owner of 2270-2280 Eglinton Ave W, The Biglieri Group
Patrick Smyth, Areca
Michael Rosenberg

Communications (Committee)

(May 26, 2014) Letter from Wendy Nott, Senior Principal, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited, regarding 839 Eglinton Avenue West (PG.Main.PG34.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47857.pdf
(June 4, 2014) E-mail from Tamara Massey (PG.Main.PG34.1.2)
(June 4, 2014) Letter from Robert A. Dragicevic, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited, regarding 416-418 Eglinton Avenue West (PG.Main.PG34.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47859.pdf
(June 4, 2014) Letter from Robert A. Dragicevic, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited, regarding 90 Eglinton Avenue West (PG.Main.PG34.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47860.pdf
(June 5, 2014) Letter from Wendy Knott, Senior Principal, WND Associates (PG.Main.PG34.1.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47904.pdf
(June 6, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin-Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated (PG.Main.PG34.1.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47921.pdf
(June 9, 2014) Letter from Bruce and Joy Davidson (PG.Main.PG34.1.7)
(May 15, 2014) Letter from Paul W. Rycroft, Project Manager, White Bell Investments Limited, Duffmits Holdings Inc. (PG.Supp.PG34.1.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48048.pdf
(June 11, 2014) E-mail from Martin Wasserman, Basmansmith LLP (PG.Supp.PG34.1.9)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Frank Chaniadi (PG.Supp.PG34.1.10)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Teddy and Kanjana Chaniadi (PG.Supp.PG34.1.11)
(June 13, 2014) Letter from Bruce C. Ketcheson, Ritchie Ketcheson Hart & Biggart LLP (PG.Supp.PG34.1.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48095.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Letter from Anne Benedetti, Goodmans, Barristers and Solicitors, for RioCan Holding owners of 660 Eglinton Avenue East (PG.New.PG34.1.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48241.pdf
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Katherine Whitehead (PG.New.PG34.1.14)
(June 18, 2014) E-mail from Rob Cazzolli, Dial Auto Parts Inc. (PG.New.PG34.1.15)
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Andrew Ferancik, Senior Principal, WND Associates (PG.New.PG34.1.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48269.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from John A.R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault, representing White Bell Investments and Duffmits Holdings (PG.New.PG34.1.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48273.pdf
(June 19, 2014) E-mail from W. Ho (PG.New.PG34.1.18)
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Joseph Guzzi The Biglieri Group (PG.New.PG34.1.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48289.pdf
(June 18, 2014) E-mail from Eileen Denny, on behalf of the Confederation of Resident & Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (PG.New.PG34.1.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48290.pdf
(June 18, 2014) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, President, Ossington Community Association (PG.New.PG34.1.21)
(June 19, 2014) Letter from David Fleming, Executive Secretary, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association (PG.New.PG34.1.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48291.pdf
(June 19, 2014) Letter from Dave Hannam, Senior Planner, Zelinka Priamo Ltd, representing Canadian Tire Real Estate Limited (PG.New.PG34.1.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48302.pdf
(June 19, 2014) Letter from Laurie J. McPherson, Bousfields Inc. (PG.New.PG34.1.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48303.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Petition from 60 residents, submitted by Jane Steele Moore, in the area impacted by the proposed amendments to the Official Plan (PG.New.PG34.1.25)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48343.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 4, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin-Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated (CC.Supp.PG34.1.26)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48474.pdf
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Chad Finkelstein (CC.Supp.PG34.1.27)
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Daniel Page (CC.Supp.PG34.1.28)
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Natalie Shay (CC.Supp.PG34.1.29)
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Patrick Smyth, for and on behalf of Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (ARECA) (CC.Supp.PG34.1.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48569.pdf
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Anne Beaumont (CC.Supp.PG34.1.31)
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Grant Maxted and Alexander Salanga (CC.Supp.PG34.1.32)
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Allan Blatt (CC.Supp.PG34.1.33)
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from Christine Taschin (CC.Supp.PG34.1.34)
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from Sandi Faraone (CC.Supp.PG34.1.35)
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from Sandi Faraone (CC.Supp.PG34.1.36)
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from Rhonda Myles (CC.Supp.PG34.1.37)
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from Barnaby Kalan and Marilyn Hertz (CC.Supp.PG34.1.38)
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from David Direnfeld and Lauren Breslin (CC.Supp.PG34.1.39)
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Irina Lustig (CC.Supp.PG34.1.40)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Paul Sabol and Karen Tu (CC.Supp.PG34.1.41)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Elizabeth Maishlish (CC.Supp.PG34.1.42)
(July 4, 2014) Fax from Jane Steele Moore (CC.Supp.PG34.1.43)
(July 4, 2014) Fax from Jane Steele Moore, Executive Member, North X South Eglinton Association (CC.Supp.PG34.1.44)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48592.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Ena Rovner (CC.Supp.PG34.1.45)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Dana S. (CC.Supp.PG34.1.46)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Nicholas Page (CC.Supp.PG34.1.47)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Paula and Gary Ouellette (CC.New.PG34.1.48)
(July 6, 2014) Letter from Jill Ross (CC.New.PG34.1.49)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Graham and Leah MacNab (CC.New.PG34.1.50)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Linda Hilpold and Noel Chase (CC.New.PG34.1.51)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Dr. Joe Goodman and Mardi Thomas-Goodman (CC.New.PG34.1.52)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Irina Lustig (CC.New.PG34.1.53)
(July 4, 2014) Letter from Rhonda Myles (CC.New.PG34.1.54)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Daniela Campione (CC.New.PG34.1.55)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Anita and Desmond Fonn (CC.New.PG34.1.56)
(July 7, 2014) Letter from William H. Roberts, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CORRA) (CC.New.PG34.1.57)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48644.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Boris Rovner (CC.New.PG34.1.58)
(July 8, 2014) E-mail from Fabio Rosa (CC.New.PG34.1.59)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Diane Gladstone and Sheldon Shoib (CC.New.PG34.1.60)
(July 8, 2014) Letter from Karen Budahazy and Avi Markus (CC.New.PG34.1.61)
(July 8, 2014) E-mail from E.L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.PG34.1.62)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48649.pdf
(July 8, 2014) E-mail from Terry Mills (CC.New.PG34.1.63)
(July 8, 2014) E-mail from Peter F. Kilborn (CC.New.PG34.1.64)
(July 8, 2014) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, President, Ossington Community Association (CC.New.PG34.1.65)
(July 8, 2014) Letter from Dr. David Direnfeld (CC.New.PG34.1.66)
(July 8, 2014) Fax from Lauren Breslin (CC.New.PG34.1.67)
(July 8, 2014) E-mail from John Alexopoulos (CC.New.PG34.1.68)
(July 7, 2014) Fax from Daniela Campione (CC.New.PG34.1.69)
(July 8, 2014) Memo from Timothy Dobson, Chairman, Lakeshore Planning Council Corp. (CC.New.PG34.1.70)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48672.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Letter from Barnaby Kalan and Marilyn Hertz (CC.New.PG34.1.71)
(July 9, 2014) Letter from William H. Roberts, Barrister and Solicitor (CC.New.PG34.1.72)
(July 10, 2014) E-mail from Sarosh Nanavati (CC.New.PG34.1.73)
(July 10, 2014) Letter from Peter F. Smith, MCIP, RPP, Bousfields Inc. (CC.New.PG34.1.74)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48610.pdf
(July 10, 2014) Submission from Tom Cohen, President, Eglinton Park Residents' Association, Ben Daube, President, Sherwood Park Residents' Association, Greg Russell, Past President, South Eglinton Ratepayers' and Residents' Association and Chris Sellors, President, Oriole Park Association, submitted by Councillor Josh Matlow, Ward 22 St. Paul's (CC.New.PG34.1.75)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48678.pdf

PG34.2 - 171 East Liberty Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         The Draft Zoning By-law Amendment appended as Attachment 5 to the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning be amended by:

 

a.         deleting the words "of which, a minimum of 10% of the total number of dwelling units shall be 3-bedroom dwelling units or larger” from Section 1(e) - Section 1(c)(iii).

 

b.         deleting Section 1(n)- Section 5(d) and replacing it with:

“A minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units to be constructed in the building shall be capable of being designed as three bedroom units in compliance with the provisions of the Ontario Building Code, and these dwelling units are to be shown on any marketing plans as three bedroom units and to be marketed as three bedroom units. These units may be sold and/or constructed with fewer bedrooms with provisions in the condominium documentation to allow renovation to three bedroom units.”

 

2.         City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 1150-2008, being a By-law to amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 171 East Liberty Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1;

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required;

 

4.         Before introducing the bills to Council, the City receive the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing’s decision on Official Plan Amendment 231;

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following:

 

a.         The following matters shall be secured as a community benefit in support of the development:

 

i.          The owner shall contribute $1,000,000.00, indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment upon issuance of the 1st above-grade building permit, toward securing and/or constructing community services and/or facilities within the general area of 171 East Liberty Street, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

            b.         The following matters shall be secured in support of the development:

 

i.          Prior to the issuance of the first demolition permit for the of part of the existing building necessary to facilitate the proposed development, the owner will submit a Construction Management Plan including but not limited to details regarding size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring activities, measures to ensure safety lighting does not negatively impact adjacent residences, construction vehicle parking locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and any other matters deemed necessary to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

ii.         Prior to the issuance of any above grade permits, an updated wind study will be provided to the satisfaction of the City Planning Division to identify measures to mitigate wind impacts year-round. Mitigation measures will be required to be incorporated into the proposed building;

 

iii.        A minimum of ten percent (10%) of the total number of dwelling units to be constructed in the mixed-use building shall be capable of being designed as three bedroom units in compliance with the provisions of the Ontario Building Code, and these dwelling units are to be shown on any marketing plans as three bedroom units and to be marketed as three bedroom units. These units may be sold and/or constructed with fewer bedrooms with provisions in the condominium documentation to allow renovation to three bedroom units;

 

iv.        Prior to the issuance of below-grade permits, the owner shall submit a functional pavement marking and signing plan for a dedicated westbound right-turn-lane at the East Liberty Street/Pirandello Street and construct, or cause to be constructed, at no cost to the City, this dedicated westbound right-turn-lane to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services; and

 

v.         The owner agrees to provide and maintain a minimum of 32 parking spaces within the commercial garage at 171 East Liberty Street for the exclusive use of visitors to the residential condominium, at no cost, between the hours of 6:00PM on Fridays and 6:00AM on Mondays to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.  These 32 parking spaces shall include signage that indicates that the spaces are for the exclusive use of visitors to the residential condominium, at no cost, between the hours of 6:00PM on Friday and 6:00AM on Monday.

 

vi.        The owner acknowledges and agrees that the City will withhold, until June 16, 2017, any demolition permits necessary to demolish all or part of the existing building necessary to construct the proposed new mixed use building at 171 East Liberty Street as detailed in the Final Report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary bills to City Council for enactment, the owner shall be required to enter into an agreement registered on title of both 171 East Liberty and 5 Hanna Avenue with the owners of each site, to which the City will be party, to secure 133 commercial parking spaces to be provided at 5 Hanna Avenue; and

 

6.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 37 Agreement and any agreement(s) required for the provision of off-site parking.

Origin

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This application proposes to permit the redevelopment of the most easterly portion of the site with a 28-storey mixed-use building consisting of ground floor retail, 12,000 square metres of office on the 2nd to 7th storeys, 283 residential units on the 7th to 28nd storeys and three levels of underground parking.  A two-storey portion of the existing building at the east end of the site is proposed to be demolished to facilitate the proposed development.

 

The proposal includes a substantial amount of new office space which will animate the east portion of Liberty Village during the daytime. The proposal locates all new development to the east portion of the site, relating better to the character of the existing adjacent towers and allowing for a transition to the lower buildings and heritage character to the west. The proposed mixed-use building is a positive contribution to the neighbourhood and provides an appropriate transition from the primarily residential area in the east to the employment area in the west.

 

This site has been reviewed through the 5-Year Municipal Comprehensive Review of the Official Plan. Council approved a conversion of a portion of the subject lands from Employment Lands to Mixed Use Areas through Official Plan Amendment 231.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Zoning By-law amendment application.  The recommendations contained within this report conform with the policies of the City's Official Plan, and City Council approved OPA 231, however as the Minister of the Municipal Affairs and Housing has yet to approve OPA 231, any bills will be held until such time as the Minister issues a decision.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 22, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-6 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 171 East Liberty Street Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70261.pdf
(May 28, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70292.pdf

Speakers

Adam Brown, Sherman Brown Dryer Karol
Kathy Traill
Councillor Mike Layton

Communications (Committee)

(May 30, 2014) E-mail from Shanmugam, Owner of 806-85 East Liberty Street (PG.Main.PG34.2.1)
(June 4, 2014) E-mail from Matt Switzer (PG.Main.PG34.2.2)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Matt Switzer (PG.Supp.PG34.2.3)

PG34.3 - 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
A report on this Item is due from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The City Planning Division recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the City of Toronto Official Plan substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment for the lands at 30 Ordnance Street attached as Attachment 3 to the report (May 28, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing to modify OPA 231, Section 17 with respect to Chapter 6, Section 14, Garrison Common North Secondary Plan, Site and Area Specific Policy No. 8 for 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance and 45 Strachan Avenue to increase the minimum employment space to include an additional 2,140 square metres and easterly boundary adjustment or, in the alternative, if OPA 231 is appealed, request the Ontario Municipal Board to amend OPA 231 in a similar manner;

 

3.         City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 159-2012, being a By-law to amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 30 Ordnance Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (June 16, 2014), from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

4.         City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 10, 11, 25, Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the supplementary report (June 16, 2014), from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

5.         Before introducing the bills contemplated in Recommendations 1, 3 and 4 above to Council for enactment, City Council require the adjustment of the proposed boundary between 30 Ordnance Street and the future park has been accepted in accordance with the Park Reconveyance Agreement dated April 16, 2012 between the City of Toronto and Build Toronto Inc to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the General Manager, Real-Estate Services;

 

6.         Before introducing the bills contemplated in Recommendation 4 above to Council for enactment, the City shall have received the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing’s Decision on Official Plan Amendment 231 approving the conversion of 10, 11, 25, Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue from Employment to Mixed Use designation or, should OPA 231 be appealed, the Ontario Municipal Board decision regarding any appeals subject to 10, 11, 25, Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue in respect of Official Plan Amendment 231 and any necessary amendment to OPA 231 to increase the minimum non-residential gross floor area as contemplated in Recommendation 2 above, will have been approved;

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required, including, as necessary, minor adjustments to the boundary between 30 Ordnance Street and the future park at 10 Ordnance Street which maintain the intent outlined in the report dated May 28, 2014, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

8.         Before introducing the necessary Bills contemplated in recommendations 1, 3 and 4 to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner(s) to enter into appropriate Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the City Solicitor to secure the following, at the owner's expense, in connection with 45 Strachan Avenue, 30 Ordnance Street, and 11 and 25 Ordnance Street, referred to as Blocks 1, 2, and 3 respectively:

 

i.          Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall make a cash contribution to the City in the amount of $3,000,000.00 toward the cost of the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycling Bridge, including work to accommodate the bridge landings within the South Stanley Park extension, the future park space at 10 Ordnance Street, and/or Fort York National Historic Site, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, Division and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Manager, Fort York National Historic Site, and the local Councillor;

 

ii.         Prior to issuance of an above-grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall construct, or cause to be constructed, any grading works and retaining walls necessary to implement the above-base grading at 10 Ordnance Street and having a minimum value of $1,500,000.00, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, Division and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Manager, Fort York National Historic Site, and the local Councillor;

 

iii.        Prior to issuance of a below-grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall have entered into an agreement to secure the relocation of Eva’s Phoenix, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with applicable civic officials;

 

iv.        Prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall make a cash contribution to the City in the amount of $750,000.00 toward the acquisition and/or construction of community services and/or facilities within the development at the Ordnance Triangle as may be agreed to between the parties, or within the vicinity of the development and in Ward 19, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor;

 

v.         The cash contributions identified in recommendation 8. i, ii, and, iv. above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment and in the case of recommendation 8. ii, to the date of construction;

 

vi.        Prior to issuance of an above-grade building permit for the first building in each of Blocks 1 and 3, the owner shall submit a Pedestrian Level Wind Study, including wind tunnel analysis, which identifies recommendations for the pedestrian realm and the outdoor areas of the podiums to mitigate wind impacts year-round. The owner shall incorporate and maintain in support of the development all recommended mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division;

 

vii.       Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the first building in each of Blocks 1, 2 and 3, the owner will submit a Construction Management Plan, for each phase, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and thereafter, shall implement the plan during the course of construction, with details to be included in the Section 37 Agreement;

 

viii.      Prior to issuance of a below-grade building permit for a building on each of Blocks 1 and 3, the owner will provide written confirmation to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, that all proposed crash mitigation measures are acceptable to Metrolinx and shall incorporate all measures into the plans and drawings submitted in the context of site plan approval pursuant to s114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended, and s41 of the Planning Act, as amended and as applicable;

 

ix.        Prior to the issuance of any building permit for the first building on Block 2, the owner shall ensure that arrangements are in place to provide for the temporary relocation of existing access routes and access easements in favour of Metrolinx within the easterly limit of Block 2 (formerly part of 10 Ordnance Street) to an alternative location through 10 Ordnance Street providing access to the Metrolinx infrastructure at the ‘tip lands’, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation;

 

x.         Prior to the issuance of an above grade building permit for the first building within either of Blocks 1 or 3, the owner shall, to the satisfaction of Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and Metrolinx, be responsible to provide for interim relocation of any Metrolinx access to its infrastructure at the "tip lands" over 10 Ordnance Street to a service road north of the Ordnance Triangle. The subject owner's responsibilities for providing any required interim access shall include the following:

 

a.         design and construction of alternative vehicular access for Metrolinx from Ordnance Street over other lands within the Ordnance Triangle, with the design and any details related to this access;

 

b.         obtaining all necessary approvals and registering temporary easements over the Ordnance Triangle Lands as may be required to allow the contemplated alternative interim access by Metrolinx to the north service road from Ordnance Street;

 

c.         removal of access and release of any existing access easements in favour of Metrolinx over 10 Ordnance Street;

 

xi.        Prior to registration of a plan of condominium on Block 1 the owner shall be responsible for the following, to the satisfaction of Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services:

 

a.         design and construction of vehicular access from Strachan Avenue to be shared by Blocks 1 and 2 and provide Metrolinx with shared access to its north service road, located north of Block 2, or an alternative arrangement. The design and any details related to this access, including but not limited to parking restrictions.

 

b.         obtain all necessary approvals to facilitate the appropriate land ownership or easement arrangements for the Strachan Avenue shared access.

 

xii.       The timing of items x and xi, above may be amended only with the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division; the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, and the General Manager, Transportation Services;

 

xiii.      Prior to the issuance of an above-grade permit for the first building in each of Blocks 1 and 3, the owner will provide, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the General Manager, Transportation Services, a public realm phasing plan detailing the phased improvements to the public realm including, but not limited to, paving and curbing details, sidewalk treatments, cycling infrastructure, pedestrian and cycling connections to the future park space at 10 Ordnance Street, and other matters which may be considered by City Staff through the review of these public realm phasing plans, all of which shall be implemented in the context of the site plan approval for the Block to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

xiv.      Prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for the first building within each of Blocks 1 and 3, and in support of the development the owner shall provide, at no cost to the City, any improvements to municipal infrastructure as required throughout each phase of development, as identified in the Phasing Drawings, prepared by Odan/Dectech Group, and dated May 21, 2014 to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager of Transportation Services;

 

xv.       Prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for the first building within either Block 1 or 3, and in support of the development, the owner shall make a cash payment in an amount to be determined by Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager of Transportation Services, as a cost sharing contribution to Strachan Avenue improvements to be undertaken by the City, which includes but may not be limited to, introduction of northbound and southbound left turn lanes, northbound right turn lane, introduction of a traffic signal control at Strachan Avenue / Wellington Street, and a southbound realignment of East Liberty Street west of Strachan Avenue;

 

xvi.      The owner shall acknowledge and agree to warning clauses with respect to each of Blocks 1 and 3, which the owner shall include in initial offers of purchase and sale as well as appropriate condominium documents, addressing the potential noise and vibration from the adjacent railways and from programs /events at the Fort York National Historic Site to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Divison;

 

xvii.     Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for the first building within Block 2, the owner shall make a cash contribution to the City in the amount of $100,000.00 to be allocated toward the costs associated with the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge and/or improvements to the area park space at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Divison, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, as required pursuant to the decision of the Ontario Municipal Board issued September 9, 2013 (OMB File PL130565) in connection with minor variance application A0915/12TEY. Such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of the Ontario Municipal Board Decision to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City; and

 

xviii.    The owner shall provide and maintain public pedestrian walkways and shall convey public access easements to the City, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor, as generally illustrated on Figure 4 of the Urban Transportation Considerations Report, prepared by BA Group dated November 2013, with details, including timing for delivery of the easements, to be determined in the context of site plan approval for the subject Block and such easement lands to be maintained by the owner of the subject Block.

 

9.         City Council request the Director of Affordable Housing Office in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report to the August 12, 2014, Toronto and East York Community Council with the details regarding the provision of affordable ownership units by Build Toronto Inc. within the Ordnance Triangle, and the mechanism through which the provision of these units will be secured;

 

10.       City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 37 Agreements; and

 

11.       City Council authorize cash-in-lieu funds generated through the Alternative Rate Parkland Dedication By-law in connection with 30 Ordnance Street as well as 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue that are above the first 5 percent to be directed for use to construct the Above Base Park Improvements to the future park within 10 Ordnance Street, the South Stanley Park extension, and/or Fort York National Historic Site, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation, Division, in consultation with the Manager, Fort York National Historic Site, and the local Councillor.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.         Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the appropriate city officials and the Ward Councillor, to report directly to City Council, on the following matters:

 

a.         Amending Recommendation 8.ii. from the recommendations Section of the Supplementary Report (June 16, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to specify the contribution of the applicant towards the above-base grading and retaining wall construction related to the future park space at 10 Ordnance Street;

 

b.         Amending Recommendation 8.xi from the recommendations Section of the Supplementary Report (June 16, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to specify the details of the applicant’s cost-sharing contribution to the Strachan Works, including the introduction of northbound and southbound left turn lanes, a northbound right turn lane, introduction of a traffic signal control at East Liberty Street/Strachan Avenue and Strachan Avenue/ Wellington Street, and a southwards realignment of East Liberty Street west of Strachan Avenue; and

 

c.         Amending the Draft Zoning By-laws for 30 Ordnance Street (Attachment 1) and 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue (Attachment 2) of the Supplementary Report (June 16, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to provide for an alternate arrangement for the provision of residential visitors parking spaces, with these residential visitors spaces potentially being located, in whole or part, within the commercial garage, and to reduce the rate of required residents parking spaces.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes the construction of two mixed-use base buildings with three residential towers at heights of 39, 33, and 24 storeys, comprising 1012 residential units and 10,810 square metres of non-residential floor space at 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue.  A new public park is proposed on the lands at 10 Ordnance Street.  This application also proposes amendments to Official Plan Amendment 125 and to Zoning By-law 159-2012 to modify existing permissions for two residential buildings at 30 Ordnance Street (10 115786 STE 19 OZ). All lands subject to this application are collectively referred to as the “Ordnance Triangle”.

 

The Ordnance Triangle lands have been approached as a comprehensively planned development.  City staff, in collaboration with Build Toronto and the applicant, have considered, among many matters, the relationship to nearby open spaces, Liberty Village, and Fort York National Historic Site, opportunities to improve pedestrian and vehicle connections, the proximity to the adjacent railway lines, the relationship to the proposed future park space, and connections to existing and proposed cycling infrastructure, including the new Fort York pedestrian and Cycling Bridge.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments subject to the provisions contained in this report.  The recommendations contained within this report conform to the policies of the City's Official Plan, and City Council approved OPA 231.  As the Minister of the Municipal Affairs and Housing has yet to approve OPA 231, any bills related to 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue will be held until such time as the Minister issues a decision on OPA 231.  Bills related to 30 Ordnance Street may be allowed to proceed in advance of the Minister’s decision, as these lands have existing residential use permissions, but will be held until such time as a boundary adjustment of the 30 Ordnance Street property is completed.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70291.pdf
(May 28, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70298.pdf

Speakers

Cynthia MacDougall, Partner, McCarthy Tetrault
Jeanhy Shim, Principle, Housing Lab Toronto
Councillor Mike Layton

3a - 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report

Origin
(June 16, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
Summary

A report dated May 28, 2014, from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, recommends approval of the Zoning By-law Amendment application to construct two mixed-use buildings with towers at heights of 39, 34, and 24 storeys, comprising 1012 residential units and 10,810 square metres of non-residential floor space at 11 and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue.  The report also recommends approval of amendments to Official Plan Amendment 125 and to Zoning By-law 159-2012 to modify existing permissions for two residential buildings at 30 Ordnance Street (10 115786 STE 19 OZ). All lands subject to this application are collectively referred to as the “Ordnance Triangle”.  Two By-law amendments reflecting these developments were to be attached to that report.

 

The purpose of this report is to provide supplemental information to the May 28, 2014 report regarding Section 37 conditions with regard to road improvements and other matters.  This report also attaches the draft by-law amendments both with respect to 30 Ordnance Street as well as 10, 11, 25 Ordnance Street / 45 Strachan Avenue.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 16, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70851.pdf

PG34.4 - Official Plan Policies for Implementing a Development Permit System - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG34.4a for information)

Communications PG34.4.29 to PG34.4.57 have been submitted on this Item

Bill 718 has been submitted on this Item.

Will be considered first after PG34.1

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         The Draft Official Plan Amendment appended to the report (May 28, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as Attachment 1 be amended by:

 

a.         Adding the following to the end of Policy 3: "However, development permit by-laws will only be prepared for those areas within the City identified by Council, following at least one community meeting in the affected area, in addition to any requirements under the Planning Act." so that the revised Policy 3 reads:

"The entire City of Toronto is identified by this policy as a development permit area. However, development permit by-laws will only be prepared for those areas within the City identified by Council, following at least one community meeting in the affected area, in addition to any requirements under the Planning Act."

 

b.         Adding the following to the end of Policy 13: "in a manner that in the opinion of City Council is at least as effective to that available for zoning and minor variance applications in areas where a development permit by-law does not exist." so that Policy 13 reads:

 

"Development permit by-laws will establish the extent and the method of public notification and the means by which Council will confer with the public on applications for a development permit, in a manner that in the opinion of City Council is at least as effective to that available for zoning and minor variance applications in areas where a development permit by-law does not exist."

 

c.         Adding the following to the end of Policy 14: "However, despite the delegation, the Ward Councillor may require that the development permit application be submitted to the appropriate Community Council and to Council for a decision." so that Policy 14 reads:

"Where a development permit by-law has been enacted, Council may delegate its decision making authority respecting development permit applications and its authority to execute, amend and release development permit agreements to a Committee or body appointed by Council or an employee of the City of Toronto. However, despite the delegation, the Ward Councillor may require that the development permit application be submitted to the appropriate Community Council and to Council for a decision."

2.         City Council amend the Official Plan by introducing policies that allow for the implementation of a development permit system substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment appended as Attachment 1 to the report (May 28, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as amended by Recommendation 1.

 

3.         City Council direct that development permit by-laws be drafted by local planning staff and brought to the local Community Council for consideration at a statutory public meeting.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make any technical or stylistic changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.         Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consider potential technical refinement of the proposed wording (without changing its intent) based on comments presented at the Planning and Growth Management Committee or submitted through members of Council and report to Council prior to consideration of the development permit system Official Plan Amendment.

2.         Directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to examine the potential for the application of a development permit by-law in the Etobicoke Centre area, the Scarborough Centre area, the North Yonge Secondary Plan area, the Yonge Eglinton Centre area and the King Spadina Planning District.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

Attached to this report is a draft Official Plan Amendment which introduces the policies necessary to implement a development permit system for the City of Toronto. The amendment includes changes to Schedule 3 of the Official Plan to provide for complete application requirements for development permit approvals. A new Schedule 3A is also proposed outlining the requirements for a complete application request to amend a development permit by-law. One additional policy was added stating Council's intent to establish methods by which public notification will be given and means by which Council will confer with the public on applications for a development permit approval.

 

The report recommends four areas for the initial consideration of development permit by-laws – Etobicoke Centre Secondary Plan area, the Scarborough Centre Secondary Plan area, the North Yonge Secondary Plan area, and the Yonge Eglinton Centre area. It is important to start with areas where growth expectations have a foundation of existing detailed policies that will help guide the creation of development permit by-law standards and criteria. Establishing a framework for the process involved in the by-law development, the structure and components of the by-law, and the internal review procedures will help future development permit by-laws.

 

It is anticipated that creating development permit by-laws will be an outcome of the current program of area-based study and review, such as the Avenue studies work program. Consultants will be retained to help prepare the necessary background studies. Funding will also include retention of the consultants as expert witnesses, should an Ontario Municipal Board hearing occur with respect to any development permit by-law.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Official Plan Policies for Implementing a Development Permit System - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70294.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70299.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 7, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Official Plan Policies for Implementing a Development Permit System [PG34.4a]
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71316.pdf

Speakers

Cathie Macdonald
Bob Murphy
Jessica Wilson, Confederation of Residents and Ratepayer Associations (CORRA)
Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto
Danielle Chin, Senior Planner, Policy & Government Relations, Building Industry and Land Development Association
George Belza, Edithvale-Yonge Community Association (Edithvale Yonge Residents’ Assocation)
Terry Mills, Arris
Councillor Jaye Robinson
Councillor Mike Layton

Communications (Committee)

(June 9, 2014) Letter from Jordan Erasmus, Planner, Infrastructure Ontario (PG.Main.PG34.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-47931.pdf
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Cathie Macdonald (PG.Supp.PG34.4.2)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Anna King, Chair, Community Liaison Committee, Stanley Knowles Housing Co operative (PG.Supp.PG34.4.3)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Tom Cohen, Chair, Eglinton Park Residents' Association (PG.Supp.PG34.4.4)
(June 16, 2014) Fax from Alan Redway (PG.Supp.PG34.4.5)
(June 18, 2014) Letter from John Campey, Executive Director, Social Planning Toronto Centre and Kevin Lee, Executive Director, Scadding Court (PG.New.PG34.4.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48236.pdf
(June 18, 2014) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayers Associations of Toronto (PG.New.PG34.4.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48261.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from William Roberts, Chair, Confederation of Resident & Ratepayers Associations in Toronto (PG.New.PG34.4.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48262.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from David Fleming, Executive Secretary, Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association (PG.New.PG34.4.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48263.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Signe Leisk, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, representing Canadian Tire Real Estate Limited (PG.New.PG34.4.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48264.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Martin Gerwin & Judith Rutledge, Co-chairs, Mimico Lakeshore Network Steering Committee (PG.New.PG34.4.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48265.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Krista Wylie, Bloor West Village Residents’ Association (PG.New.PG34.4.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48267.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Ralph Daley, President, Grange Community Association (PG.New.PG34.4.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48268.pdf
(June 18, 2014) E-mail from T J D West (PG.New.PG34.4.14)
(June 18, 2014) Letter from David Harrison, Chair Annex Residents' Association (PG.New.PG34.4.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48272.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Patrick Smyth, Avenue Road Eglinton Community Association (PG.New.PG34.4.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48257.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Danielle Chin, Senior Planner, Building Industry and Land Development Association (PG.New.PG34.4.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48292.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from George Belza, Partner, Analogica (PG.New.PG34.4.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48275.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot, representing CAPREIT Limited Partnership (PG.New.PG34.4.19)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48293.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Terry Mills, Arris Strategy Studio (PG.New.PG34.4.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48294.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Peggy Moulder, Etobicoke-Lakeshore Community Planning Group (PG.New.PG34.4.21)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48295.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Brian Maguire, Acting Chair, Forest Hill Homeowners' Association (PG.New.PG34.4.22)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48277.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot, representing RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust (PG.New.PG34.4.23)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48278.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Letter from Denise Baker, WeirFoulds LLP, various food services companies (PG.New.PG34.4.24)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48279.pdf
(June 18, 2014) E-mail from Robert Gulllins (PG.New.PG34.4.25)
(June 18, 2014) E-mail from Steve Nazar (PG.New.PG34.4.26)
(June 18, 2014) Letter from William Roberts, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (PG.New.PG34.4.27)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48321.pdf
(June 19, 2014) Letter from Mary Todorow, Research/Policy Analyst, Advocacy Centre for Tenants Ontario (PG.New.PG34.4.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48342.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 4, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Carol Fripp, Co-Presidents, Leaside Property Owners Association (CC.Supp.PG34.4.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48475.pdf
(July 4, 2014) Letter from CORRA Executive, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.Supp.PG34.4.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48517.pdf
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Jessica Wilson, President, Ossington Community Association (CC.Supp.PG34.4.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48578.pdf
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from Krista Wylie on behalf of Bloor West Village Residents' Association (CC.Supp.PG34.4.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48579.pdf
(July 6, 2014) E-mail from William H. Roberts, CORRA Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.Supp.PG34.4.33)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48580.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Steve Nazar (CC.Supp.PG34.4.34)
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from Chris Sellors, President, Oriole Park Association (CC.Supp.PG34.4.35)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48582.pdf
(July 4, 2014) Letter from Timothy Dobson, OALA, Chairman, Lakeshore Planning Council Corp. (CC.Supp.PG34.4.36)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48583.pdf
(July 5, 2014) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (CC.Supp.PG34.4.37)
(July 4, 2014) Letter from Geoff Kettel and George Milbrandt, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Association (FoNTRA) (CC.Supp.PG34.4.38)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48585.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Alan Redway (CC.Supp.PG34.4.39)
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Ben Daube, President, The Sherwood Park Residents' Association (CC.Supp.PG34.4.40)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48597.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Brian Maguire, Acting Chair, Forest Hill Homeowners' Association (CC.New.PG34.4.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48631.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from George S. Belza, Partner, Analogica (CC.New.PG34.4.42)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48632.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Vanessa Minkowski on behalf of the Old Mill Community Association Board (CC.New.PG34.4.43)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48633.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Jeremy Skinner (CC.New.PG34.4.44)
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, representing Deltera Inc. (CC.New.PG34.4.45)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48635.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, representing Greey Realty Holdings Limited (CC.New.PG34.4.46)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48636.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, representing Lindvest Properties Limited (CC.New.PG34.4.47)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48637.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, representing 2142792 Ontario Ltd., 2157341 Ontario Ltd., King Edward Investments Inc., Emma Nicola Potemkin Ltd., 1028651 Ontario Ltd., 1452736 Ontario Ltd., 619595 Ontario Inc., 1115790 Ontario Inc., 736963 Ontario Ltd., 847702 Ontario Ltd. and 2054138 Ontario Ltd. (CC.New.PG34.4.48)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48638.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, representing Bailey & Company (CC.New.PG34.4.49)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48639.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, representing S-K Sportswear Limited, Szmul Koplowicz and Abraham Koplowicz (CC.New.PG34.4.50)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48640.pdf
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliot LLP, Barristers and Solicitors, representing Terracap Management Inc. (CC.New.PG34.4.51)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48641.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Rasa Mazeika (CC.New.PG34.4.52)
(July 7, 2014) Letter from Ken Greenberg, Principal, Greenberg Consultants Inc. (CC.New.PG34.4.53)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48658.pdf
(July 8, 2014) E-mail from Frank Peters (CC.New.PG34.4.54)
(July 8, 2014) E-mail from E.L. Cramp, Secretary, High Park Residents' Association (CC.New.PG34.4.55)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48660.pdf
(July 8, 2014) Letter from Eileen Denny, President, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (CC.New.PG34.4.56)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48661.pdf
(July 4, 2014) Letter from Robert Truman, Planning and Development Consultant (CC.New.PG34.4.57)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48662.pdf

PG34.5 - Proposed Amendments to Agreements between Ryerson University and the City of Toronto - Sam the Record Man Signage

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communication PG34.5.2 has been submitted on this Item

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to enter into of a License Agreement between the City and Ryerson University permitting Ryerson to display the restored Sam the Record Man signage, referred to in the report (June 10, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on the roof of the City-owned building at 277 Victoria Street, such Licensing Agreement to be on the terms and conditions contained in Schedule "1" to the report June 10, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and satisfactory to the Chief Corporate Officer in consultation with the City Solicitor;

 

2.         City Council approve an amendment to Chapter 694 of the Municipal Code, Signs, General to permit the display of a roof sign and a projecting sign as described in Attachment 3 to the report (June 10, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B at the premises municipally known as 277 Victoria Street; and

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to release the Easement Agreement registered as Instrument Numbers AT1868230, AT1868231 and AT1868232 from title to Ryerson's new Student Learning Centre and its Gould Street Library once Ryerson has:

 

a.         Executed the Licensing Agreement for 277 Victoria Street to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor;

 

b.         Installed the restored Sam Signage on the roof of 277 Victoria Street to the satisfaction of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Chief Building Official; and

 

c.         Entered into an Amending Site Plan Agreement, which is registered on title to Ryerson's new Student Learning Centre at 341, 347 and 349 Yonge Street, such Agreement to provide for  the installation and maintenance by Ryerson of a plaque directing interested persons to the location of the Sam Signage at 277 Victoria Street, the Agreement and plaque to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

4.         City Council direct the appropriate City staff to examine funding sources for a "Toronto Music City" sign that would anchor the Sam Signage to the building and provide a visual link to a possible music related facility at 38 Dundas Street East.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare any necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes as may be required.

 

6.         City Council direct Real Estate Services and Economic Development and Culture Division staff to explore the temporary use of 38 Dundas Street East (formerly occupied by Hakim Optical), in conjunction with The Downtown Yonge BIA or other related organizations including Music Advisory Council, the Canadian Independent Music Association, or Ryerson University, as a possible "Toronto Music City" or other related facility for music development, promotion, tourism and export development and report back to the appropriate committee in 2015.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Urban Design Manager, City Planning gave a presentation to the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

Origin

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Summary

This report recommends that the City offer to enter into a license agreement with Ryerson University ("Ryerson") to permit Ryerson to display the restored Sam the Record Man signage, referred to in this report (the "Sam Signage"), on the roof of the City-owned building at 277 Victoria Street, adjacent to Dundas Square.  Any determination by Ryerson to enter into such a licensing agreement is subject to the physical and financial feasibility of doing so and the approval of Ryerson's Board of Governors, if required.

 

The City's existing agreement with Ryerson securing the restoration and reinstallation of the signage would be released from title to Ryerson's Student Learning Centre and the Ryerson Library once the license agreement with respect to 277 Victoria Street is entered into and the restored signage has been installed on the roof of 277 Victoria Street. 

 

This report also recommends approval of a site-specific amendment to Chapter 694, Signs, General ("Chapter 694") to permit the Sam Signage to be located on the roof of the building at 277 Victoria Street, as well as to permit the display of a large projecting sign which will integrate the Sam Signage into this building.  This property is located within the Downtown Yonge Street Special Sign District and is specifically contemplated in the Signage Vision for the Downtown Yonge Street Strip (adopted by Council in 2009) as a location for 'Landmark Signage', such as the Sam Signage.

 

The City has been working in close collaboration with Ryerson University and other important stakeholders, including the Sniderman Family and representatives of the Music Industry to find a culturally appropriate and relevant location for the Sam Signage as per Councils direction.

 

Under the current agreement, Ryerson may install the Sign on either the Student Learning Centre or Gould Street Library frontage, however based on public feedback and extensive consultation with stakeholders and taking into consideration the present context, City Staff believe the rooftop of 277 Victoria Street is the most appropriate location. 

 

Ryerson has gone through considerable lengths and expense to assist city staff with this effort.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2014) Report and Attached Schedule "1" and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, on the Proposed Amendments to Agreements between Ryerson University and the City of Toronto - Sam the Record Man Signage
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70198.pdf
Attachment No. 3 - Description of Proposed Signs at 277 Victoria Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70550.pdf
(June 19, 2014) Presentation on Proposed Amendments to Agreements between Ryerson University and the City of Toronto - Sam the Record Man Signage
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70794.pdf

Speakers

Sean Boulton
Amy Terrill
Sam and Jack Markle, The Brothers Markle Inc.

Communications (Committee)

(June 19, 2014) E-mail from Mark Garner, Executive Director and CSO, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (PG.New.PG34.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48299.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 30, 2014) E-mail from Bobby and Jason Sniderman (CC.Main.PG34.5.2)

PG34.6 - Construction Hoarding Sign Fees and Public Realm Enhancements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the introduction of a monthly fee for the use of space for the display of a construction hoarding sign on construction hoarding within the public right of way of $5.60 per month per square metre of construction hoarding signs, effective January 1, 2015 to be adjusted annually as part of the operating budget process, with the revenues from the monthly fee to be directed to a reserve fund, that will be drawn upon by Arts and Culture Services, Economic Development and Culture Division in the year following collection of the fees, to be directed to a program developed by General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Toronto Arts Council, to create new elements and features and improve existing elements and features of the public right of way through the creation of temporary and permanent art, with a particular focus on community arts programs involving disadvantaged youth and newcomers in the creation of art, Arts and Culture Services to provide administration for the program, and operational oversight of the program operated by the Toronto Arts Council.

 

2.         City Council approve amendments to the Guidelines for Covered Walkways so that, whenever hoarding is provided on the public right of way, 50 per cent of the surface area of the hoarding be used for community art, subject to consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

3.         City Council authorize and direct staff to take the necessary steps to implement the recommendations, including amending any necessary by-laws, and that City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to negotiate and enter into any agreements, in a form which is satisfactory to the City Solicitor, as required for the establishment and operation of the program described in Recommendation 1, and that the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture be authorized to execute any required agreements or related documents on behalf of the City.

Origin

(June 6, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services, after consultation with Toronto Building, City Planning, Economic Development & Culture, and Financial Planning, is responding to a request from Planning and Growth Management Committee to consider further the introduction of additional fees for the display of advertising signs with First Party Content on construction hoarding, and the potential use of the funds from that fee for enhancements to the public realm related to public art.

 

A review was completed of the City of Toronto's experience collecting payments or rents for advertising displayed on City property or throughout the city.  A new market-based Construction Hoarding Sign in Right-of-way Fee of $5.60 per month per square metre of construction hoarding signs containing First Party Content is being proposed, effective January 1, 2015, and is to be adjusted annually as part of the operating budget process. It is also proposed that increased revenues from this fee be directed to a reserve fund that will be drawn upon by Arts and Culture Services, Economic Development and Culture Division, for purposes of commissioning, acquiring, and maintaining public art for the public realm across the City.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 6, 2014) Report and Appendix A from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Construction Hoarding Sign Fees and Public Realm Enhancements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70295.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Neil McDermott, Captain, Ward Advocacy Group 21, Cycle Toronto (PG.Supp.PG34.6.1)
(June 17, 2014) Letter from Danielle Chin, Senior Planner, Building Industry and Land Development Association (PG.Supp.PG34.6.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48184.pdf

PG34.7 - Amendments to Chapter 694, Signs, General, with Respect to the Gardiner Gateway Special Sign District

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
14 - Parkdale-High Park, 19 - Trinity-Spadina

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the proposed changes respecting the boundaries, illumination requirements, time-of-day operating requirements, and separation distance requirements for third party electronic signs located in the Gardiner Gateway Special Sign District, as outlined in the Draft Bylaw contained in Appendix 1 to the report (June 3, 2014) from the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building;

 

2.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to establish each of the premises described in Appendix 2 to the report (June 3, 2014) from the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building as an OS-Open Space Sign District, C-Commercial, E-Employment and R-Residential by replacing Sign District Maps Ward 19: Trinity-Spadina and Ward 14: Parkdale-High Park of Schedule A, Maps, with maps substantially similar to the maps attached as Appendix 3 to the report (June 3, 2014) from the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building; and

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft by-laws as may be required.

Origin

(June 3, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and the Executive Director, Toronto Building

Summary

This report reviews and recommends changes to regulations that apply to the Gardiner Gateway Special Sign District ("GG-SSD") as defined by Chapter 694 of the Municipal Code, Signs, General ("Chapter 694"). The proposed changes include reducing the area of the GG-SSD, updating the sign district designations of properties within the GG-SSD, as well as modifying the regulations to reduce the impact of large-format third party signs displaying electronic sign copy on sensitive land uses within or near the GG-SSD.

 

The Planning and Growth Management Committee, at its April 10, 2014 meeting, directed staff to report back on amendments to Chapter 694 required to eliminate the GG-SSD. In response to this direction, staff conducted two public consultation sessions inviting area residents, business and property owners, elected officials, and other stakeholders to participate.

 

Based on the consultation, staff are recommending amendments that would address many of the impacts signs in the area have on nearby sensitive land uses through modifications to the regulations and boundaries of the GG-SSD instead of its complete elimination. As well, maintaining the GG-SSD will allow for the modification or replacement of existing signs into more modern signs which have fewer impacts on surrounding land uses.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Amendments to Chapter 694, Signs, General, with Respect to the Gardiner Gateway Special Sign District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70145.pdf
Appendix 1 - Draft Bylaw: Amendments to Chapter 694
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70309.pdf
Appendix 2 - List of Affected Premises
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70310.pdf
Appendix 3 - Schedule A Map - Ward 19: Trinity-Spadina
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70311.pdf

Speakers

Kathy Traill
Roy Dzeko, CBS Outdoor
Dave Meslin, Scenic Toronto
Chris Bentler, VP Operations, Cieslok Media
Councillor Mike Layton
Councillor Peter Leon
Councillor Gord Perks

Communications (Committee)

(June 18, 2014) E-mail from Fred Dominelli (PG.New.PG34.7.1)

PG34.8 - Four Area-Specific Amendments to Chapter 694 Concerning Third Party Ground Signs Located on Rail Lands Immediately Adjacent to Highways 401 and 427

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
2 - Etobicoke North, 12 - York South-Weston, 40 - Scarborough Agincourt
Attention
Communication PG34.8.3 has been submitted on this Item

To be considered after the lunch recess on Thursday, July 10

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to permit the sign, and impose area restrictions on the display of third party signs as set out as Application #1 in the June 3, 2014 staff report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, as follows:

 

a.         by amending § 694-24A to add the following as site-specific area restrictions on the display or erection of a third party sign:

 

i.          The portions of the Kingston Subdivision located within 100 metres of the each of the following locations therein where a third party ground sign is currently erected or displayed: near Greenwood Avenue and north of Walpole Avenue, near Dundas Street East and west of Logan Avenue, near Queen Street East and west of McGee Street, near Eastern Avenue and south of Broadview Avenue, near Dundas Street East and west of Tiverton Avenue, near Eastern Avenue and west of Dibble Street, near Gerrard Street East and east of Carlaw Avenue, and near Victoria Park Avenue and north of Gerrard Street East, and near Greenwood Avenue and north of Ivy Avenue;

 

ii.         The portions of the Weston Subdivision located within 100 metres of the each of the following locations therein where a third party ground sign is currently erected or displayed: near Lawrence Avenue West and east of Weston Road; and,

 

iii.        The portions of the Newmarket Subdivision located within 100 metres of the each of the following locations therein where a third party ground sign is currently erected or displayed: near Sheppard Avenue West and east of Keele Street.

 

b.         by amending Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments, to Chapter 694 by adding an Area Specific Amendment substantially in accordance with the following:

 

Weston Subdivision - Notwithstanding § 694-22A and D, § 694-24A and § 694-25C, the portion of Weston Subdivision, immediately to the south of Highway 401, and approximately 200 metres east of the interchange of Highways 401 and 409, as set out in heavy lines in Diagram #1, submitted by Councillor Milczyn, may contain a single sign as follows:

 

1.         One third party ground sign containing two sign faces, facing easterly and westerly, each displaying electronic static copy, provided:

 

a.         Each of the two sign faces shall provide that a minimum of five percent of the daily sign copy displayed shall be non-commercial messaging;

b.         The sign shall not contain a sign face with a horizontal measurement which exceeds 14.63 metres;

c.         The sign shall not contain a sign face with a vertical measurement which exceeds 4.27 metres;

d.         The sign face area shall not exceed 63 square metres;

e.         The sign contains two sign faces;

f.          The two sign faces shall be separated by an interior angle not greater than 45 degrees;

g.         The height of the sign shall not exceed 20.0 metres;

h.         The sign shall not be erected within 2.0 metres of the property line;

i.          The sign shall not be erected within 6.0 metres of the intersection of two street lines;

j.          The sign shall not be erected within 30.0 metres of any premises located, in whole or in part, in an R, RA, or OS sign district;

k.         The sign shall not be erected until the following third party ground signs are removed and all associated permits revoked: the signs located within the Kingston Subdivision near: Greenwood Avenue and Walpole Avenue; Dundas Street East and Logan Avenue; Queen Street East and McGee Street; Eastern Avenue and Broadview Avenue; Dundas Street East and Tiverton Avenue; Eastern Avenue and Dibble Street; Gerrard Street East and Carlaw Avenue; Victoria Park Avenue and Gerrard Street East; and near Greenwood Avenue and north of Ivy Avenue; the sign located within the Weston Subdivision near Lawrence Avenue West and Weston Road; and, the sign located within the Newmarket Subdivision near Sheppard Avenue West and Keele Street;

l.          The sign shall replace all third party signs currently erected or displayed on the portion of the premises set out in heavy lines in Diagram #1 submitted by Councillor Milczyn;

m.        The sign shall be appropriately located and oriented substantially in accordance with the location, position and placement described in the diagram submitted by Councillor Milczyn; and

n.         The sign shall otherwise comply in all respects with the provisions of this chapter.

 

2.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to permit the sign, and impose area restrictions on the display of third party signs as set out as Application #2 in the June 3, 2014 staff report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, as follows:

 

a.         by amending § 694-24A to add the following as site-specific area restrictions on the display or erection of a third party sign:

 

i.          The portions of the Weston Subdivision located within 100 metres of the each of the following locations therein where a third party ground sign is currently erected or displayed: near Martin Grove Road and south of Bethridge Road, and near King Street West and east of Atlantic Avenue; and

 

ii.         The portions of the Oakville Subdivision located within 100 metres of the each of the following locations therein where a third party ground sign is currently erected or displayed: near Royal York Road and north of Cavell Avenue, and near Royal York Road and south of Judson Street.

 

b.         by amending Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments, to Chapter 694 by adding an Area Specific Amendment substantially in accordance with the following:

 

Weston Subdivision - Notwithstanding § 694-22A and D, § 694-24A and § 694-25C, the portion of Weston Subdivision, immediately to the east of  Highway 427, and approximately 1500 metres south of Rexdale Boulevard and approximately. 900 metres south of the interchange of Highway 427 and Highway 409, as set out in heavy lines in Diagram #2 submitted by Councillor Milczyn, may contain a single sign as follows:

 

1.         One third party ground sign containing two sign faces, facing easterly and westerly, each displaying electronic static copy, provided:

 

a.         Each of the two sign faces shall provide that a minimum of five percent of the daily sign copy displayed shall be non-commercial messaging;

b.         The sign shall not contain a sign face with a horizontal measurement which exceeds 14.63 metres;

c.         The sign shall not contain a sign face with a vertical measurement which exceeds 4.27 metres;

d.         The sign face area shall not exceed 63.0 square metres;

e.         The sign contains two sign faces;

f.          The two sign faces shall be separated by an interior angle not greater than 45 degrees;

g.         The height of the sign shall not exceed 20.0 metres;

h.         The sign shall not be erected within 2.0 metres of the property line;

i.          The sign shall not be erected within 6.0 metres of the intersection of two street lines;

j.          The sign shall not be erected within 30.0 metres of any premises located, in whole or in part, in an R, RA, or OS sign district;

k.         The sign shall not be erected until the following third party ground signs are removed and all associated permits revoked: the signs located within the Weston Subdivision near: Martin Grove Road and Bethridge Road; and, King Street West and Atlantic Avenue; and, within the Oakvillle Subdivision near: Royal York Road and Cavell Avenue; and, Royal York Road and Judson Street;

l.          The sign shall replace all third party signs currently erected or displayed on the portion of the premises set out in heavy lines in Diagram #2 submitted by Councillor Milczyn;

m.        The sign shall be appropriately located and oriented substantially in accordance with the location, position and placement described in Diagram #2 submitted by Councillor Milczyn; and

n.         The sign shall otherwise comply in all respects with the provisions of this chapter.

 

3.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to permit the sign, and impose area restrictions on the display of third party signs as set out as Application #3 in the June 3, 2014 staff report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, as follows:

 

a.         by amending § 694-24A to add the following as site-specific area restrictions on the display or erection of a third party sign:

 

i.          The portions of the Newmarket Subdivision located within 100 metres of the each of the following locations therein where a third party ground sign is currently erected or displayed: near Highway 401 and east of Keele Street, near Wilson Avenue and west of Murray Road, near Lawrence Avenue West and west of Caledonia Road, near Castlefield Avenue and west of Caledonia Road, near Rogers Road and west of Caledonia Road, near St. Clair avenue West and west of Caledonia Road, near Davenport Road and west of Caledonia Park Road, near Bloor Street West and west of St. Helens Avenue, near Finch Avenue West and west of Chesswood Drive, and near Wilson Avenue and west of Murray Road.

 

b.         by amending Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments, to Chapter 694 by adding an Area Specific Amendment substantially in accordance with the following:

 

Newmarket Subdivision - Notwithstanding § 694-22A and D, § 694-24A and § 694-25C, the portion of Newmarket Subdivision, immediately to the south of Highway 401, approximately 720 metres east of Keele Street and approximately 1200 metres west of Dufferin Street, as set out in heavy lines in Diagram #3 submitted by Councillor Milczyn, may contain a single sign as follows:

 

1.         One third party ground sign containing two sign faces, facing easterly and westerly, each displaying electronic static copy, provided:

 

a.         Each of the two sign faces shall provide that a minimum of five percent of the daily sign copy displayed shall be non-commercial messaging;

b.         The sign shall not contain a sign face with a horizontal measurement which exceeds 14.63 metres;

c.         The sign shall not contain a sign face with a vertical measurement which exceeds 4.27 metres;

d.         The sign face area shall not exceed 63 square metres;

e.         The sign contains two sign faces;

f.          The two sign faces shall be separated by an interior angle not greater than 45 degrees;

g.         The height of the sign shall not exceed 20.0 metres;

h.         The sign shall not be erected within 2.0 metres of the property line;

i.          The sign shall not be erected within 6.0 metres of the intersection of two street lines;

j.          The sign shall not be erected within 30.0 metres of any premises located, in whole or in part, in an R, RA, or OS sign district;

k.         The sign shall not be erected until the following third party ground signs are removed and all associated permits revoked: the signs located within the Newmarket Subdivision near: Highway 401 and Keele Street, Wilson Avenue and Murray Road, Lawrence Avenue West and Caledonia Road, Castlefield Avenue and Caledonia Road, Rogers Road and Caledonia Road, St. Clair Avenue West and Caledonia Road, Davenport Road and Caledonia Park Road, Bloor Street West and St. Helens Avenue, Finch Avenue West and Chesswood Drive, and Wilson Avenue and Murray Road;

l.          The sign shall replace all third party signs currently erected or displayed on the portion of the premises set out in heavy lines in Diagram #3 submitted by Councillor Milczyn;

m.        The sign shall be appropriately located and oriented substantially in accordance with the location, position and placement described in Diagram #3 submitted by Councillor Milczyn; and

n.         The sign shall otherwise comply in all respects with the provisions of this chapter.

 

4.         City Council amend Chapter 694, Signs, General, to permit the sign, and impose area restrictions on the display of third party signs as set out as Application #4 in the June 3, 2014 staff report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, as follows:

 

a.         by amending § 694-24A to add the following as site-specific area restrictions on the display or erection of a third party sign:

 

i.          The portions of the Bala Subdivision located within 100 metres of the each of the following locations therein where a third party ground sign is currently erected or displayed: near Sheppard Avenue East and west of Leslie Street, near Leslie Street and south of Highway 401, and near Warden Avenue and south of Danforth Avenue; and

 

ii.         The portions of the Kingston Subdivision located within 100 metres of the each of the following locations therein where a third party ground sign is currently erected or displayed: near Birchmount Road and south of Raleigh Avenue, and near Brimley Road and north of Skagway Avenue.

 

b.         by amending Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments, to Chapter 694 by adding an Area Specific Amendment substantially in accordance with the following:

 

"Uxbridge" Subdivision - Notwithstanding § 694-22A and D, § 694-24A and § 694-25C, the portion of the rail corridor commonly known as the "Uxbridge" Subdivision, immediately to the south of Highway 401, approximately 400 metres east of Kennedy Road and approximately 400 metres west of Midland Avenue, as set out in heavy lines in Diagram #4 submitted by Councillor Milczyn, may contain a single sign as follows:

 

1.         One third party ground sign containing two sign faces, facing easterly and westerly, each displaying electronic static copy, provided:

 

a.         Each of the two sign faces shall provide that a minimum of five percent of the daily sign copy displayed shall be non-commercial messaging;

b.         The sign shall not contain a sign face with a horizontal measurement which exceeds 14.63 metres;

c.         The sign shall not contain a sign face with a vertical measurement which exceeds 4.27 metres;

d.         The sign face area shall not exceed 63 square metres;

e.         The sign contains two sign faces;

f.          The two sign faces shall be separated by an interior angle not greater than 45 degrees;

g.         The height of the sign shall not exceed 20.0 metres;

h.         The sign shall not be erected within 2.0 metres of the property line;

i.          The sign shall not be erected within 6.0 metres of the intersection of two street lines;

j.          The sign shall not be erected within 30.0 metres of any premises located, in whole or in part, in an R, RA, or OS sign district;

k.         The sign shall not be erected until the following third party ground signs are removed and all associated permits revoked: the signs located within the Bala Subdivision near: Sheppard Avenue and Leslie Street; Leslie Street and Highway 401; and Warden Avenue and Danforth Avenue; and, within the Kingston Subdivision near: Birchmount Road and Raleigh Avenue; and Brimley Road and Skagway Avenue;

l.          The sign shall replace all third party signs currently erected or displayed on the portion of the premises set out in heavy lines in Diagram #4 submitted by Councillor Milczyn;

m.        The sign shall be appropriately located and oriented substantially in accordance with the location, position and placement described in the diagram submitted by Councillor Milczyn; and

n.         The sign shall otherwise comply in all respects with the provisions of this chapter.

Origin

(June 3, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building

Summary

This report responds to a direction from the Planning and Growth Management Committee asking staff to report to their June 19, 2014 meeting on four area-specific amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 694, Signs, General, ("Chapter 694") on behalf of Allvision Canada (the "Applicant") and Metrolinx, concerning specific portions of railway corridors owned and managed by Metrolinx.

 

The Applicant seeks to amend Chapter 694 to permit four ground signs displaying electronic static third party copy.  Each sign is proposed to have a height of 19.8 metres.  Three of the signs are proposed to have two sign faces with a sign face area of approximately 130 square metres each, and one sign is proposed to have two sign faces with a sign face area of approximately 76.5 square metres on each side.  Each of the proposed third party signs is to be located immediately adjacent to either Highway 401 or Highway 427. The applicant also proposes to remove 38 existing signs and introduce new area-specific restrictions to Metrolinx rail corridors that would prevent new third party signs from being constructed at the locations of the signs being removed.

 

This report recommends refusal of the request as each of the four proposed third party ground signs are approximately four to six times larger than and twice as tall as permitted in Chapter 694 and are not permitted, by way of area specific restrictions in Chapter 694, as well as the requirements of the Public Transportation and Highway Improvement Act and the Ministry of Transportation's (MTO) 'Corridor Signing Policy'.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2014) Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on the Four Area-Specific Amendments to Chapter 694 Concerning Third Party Ground Signs Located on Rail Lands Immediately Adjacent to Highways 401 and 427
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70147.pdf
Attachment 1: Applicant's Submission Packages
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70313.pdf
Attachment 2: Ministry of Transportation Ontario Corridor Signing Policy, 2010
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70314.pdf
(June 16, 2014) Diagrams 1 - 4 from Councillor Milczyn
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70936.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 10, 2014) Map of sign locations displayed in the meeting by the Chief Building Official
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71380.pdf

Speakers

Blair Murdoch and Steven Zakem, AllVision
Steve Wolowich, Director Real Estate
Dave Meslin, Scenic Toronto

Communications (Committee)

(June 16, 2014) Letter from D Dyer, ABC Residents Association (PG.New.PG34.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48255.pdf
(June 18, 2014) E-mail from Fred Dominelli (PG.New.PG34.8.2)

Communications (City Council)

(July 7, 2014) Letter from Sheila White, President, WORDS Media & Communications Inc. (CC.Supp.PG34.8.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48591.pdf

PG34.11 - Port Lands Acceleration Initiative Phase 2 - Progress Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
The Deputy City Manager, Cluster B has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PG34.11a for information)

Communication PG34.11.3 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Manager, the Deputy City Manager Cluster B, and the Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with Waterfront Toronto, to initiate discussions with federal and provincial officials regarding one-third funding contributions to accelerate the design and construction of Port Lands flood protection and related infrastructure, and report back to City Council in the first half of 2015;

 

2.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager Cluster B and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, with Waterfront Toronto, to complete the development of the Port Lands Planning Framework, Port Lands and South of Eastern Transportation and Servicing Class EA Master Plan, Film Studio District and Cousins Quay/Villiers Island precinct plans, based on the Land Use Direction in Appendix 3 of the report (June 5, 2014) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B including any amendments recommended for the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan and implementing planning instruments such as Zoning By-laws or a Development Permit System, and report back to Planning and Growth Management Committee in the first half of 2015;

 

3.         City Council direct that as part of the continuing Port Lands Planning Framework that the following be included in the requested report set out in Recommendation 2:

 

a.         Projected parkland requirements for 40,000 new residents;

b.         Expanded parkland and greenspace opportunities be considered including the replacement of the full acreage lost from the Ashbridges Bay Sewage Treatment Plant Master Plan to the TTC Leslie Barns;

c.         Report on a revised land use direction that expands the pastoral entrance to Tommy Thompson Park on the west side of Leslie from Commissioners Street to Unwin Avenue;

d.         Update on the request by Waterfront Toronto to straighten Unwin Avenue;

e.         Definition of the elements of a robust biodiversity framework for the Port Lands;

f.          Timetable for the completion of the Don Greenway south of the Ship Channel as a biological corridor between the natural areas of the Mouth of the Don and Lake Ontario Park and Tommy Thompson Park; and

g.         Guidelines for a zero net energy import with a zero waste export.

 

4.         City Council direct City staff to conduct further consultations with film and TV studio operators about future needs and trends for additional studio space;

 

5.         City Council request City Staff to consider the concerns raised by the film and TV industry by ensuring diversity and flexibility of land uses in the Film Studio District;

 

6.         City Council authorize City staff and Waterfront Toronto to complete the revisions to the  Lower Don Lands Class EA Infrastructure Master Plan Environmental Study Report and file the report in the public record, in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environment Assessment process;

 

7.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager Cluster B and the General Manager of Solid Waste Management Services, in consultation with appropriate City divisions, to review relocation options for the 400 Commissioners Street Waste Transfer Station, within the context of the Solid Waste Long Term Waste Management Strategy, and report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in the first half of 2015;

 

8.         City Council direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on the implementation of the Port Lands Area Specific Development Charge By-law in the first quarter of 2015;

 

9.         City Council confirm the Hearn as a Strategic Site as identified in the Port Lands Acceleration Initiative (PLAI);

 

10.       City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to report in the first half of 2015 on the feasibility of Richard L. Hearn Generating Station as for sport, culture, or mixed-use social enterprise;

 

11.       City Council request the Waterfront Secretariat and Economic Development and Culture, in cooperation with the local Ward Councillor, the emerging "Friends of the Hearn" community group, relevant stakeholders, and appropriate City divisions, work to determine if a business case exists for the adaptive re-use of the Richard L. Hearn Generating Station as a sport, culture, and mixed-use social enterprise;

 

12.       City Council request Waterfront Toronto to review the draft Lake Ontario Park Master Plan as part of the ongoing Port Lands Planning Process with a clearer definition of the relationship between the Leslie Street Spit and Lake Ontario Park and the Don Greenway; and

 

13.       City Council request that the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary actions to give effect thereto, including the execution of agreements and future Budget submissions.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.         Requested the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, to report directly to Council on a timetable for the opening to the Leslie Slip and completion of the Leslie Lookout, as part of the continuing Port Lands Planning Framework.

 

The Deputy City Manager, Cluster B and Director, Waterfront Secretariat gave a presentation to the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

Origin

(June 5, 2014) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Summary

The purpose of this report is to identify the progress achieved in 2013 and 2014 on the Port Lands Acceleration Initiative (PLAI), specifically with respect to flood protection, area planning, infrastructure cost estimation and funding.  In addition, the report identifies next steps.

 

There are five major pieces of work that are either complete or well underway that will enable the redevelopment of the Port Lands, consistent with City Council direction for the PLAI:

 

1.         The Don Mouth Flood Protection EA;

2.         The Lower Don Lands Infrastructure EA;

3.         The Port Lands and South of Eastern Transportation and Servicing EA;

4.         The Port Lands Planning Framework; and

5.         A funding and financing implementation plan.

 

The first major piece of work, the Don Mouth Flood Protection EA, has been submitted to the Ontario Ministry of the Environment.  Ministry approval is anticipated by fall 2014.  All that is needed is funding for implementation of the preferred option described in the EA.

 

Second, the Lower Don Lands Infrastructure EA (related to roads, bridges, transit, and other city-building infrastructure) has been completed in draft.  The EA will be finalized by late summer 2014.  As per the Class EA process, the EA document will need to be filed on the public record in fall 2014.

 

Third, the Port Lands and South of Eastern Transportation and Servicing EA will address roads, bridges, transit and other infrastructure in the rest of the Port Lands and lands to the north.  The EA is underway and it will be completed in Q2 of 2015.

 

Fourth, the Port Lands Planning Framework will guide development in the Port Lands.  The final Framework will be completed in Q2 of 2015.  An interim report "Port Lands Planning Framework: Land Use Direction" is attached as Appendix 3.  The Framework will inform three related precinct plans:

 

-           The Film Studio District Precinct Plan (underway, to be completed in 2015);

-           The Villiers Island/Cousins Quay Precinct Plan (underway, to be completed in 2015); and

-           The Polson Quay Precinct Plan (to be initiated in 2015).

 

Waterfront Toronto has provided new cost estimates for the proposed PLAI flood protection works and related infrastructure projects.  The estimates have been refined but they have not changed substantially since 2012. The estimate for flood protection is $470 M (as opposed to $450 M in 2012). The estimate for related infrastructure is $320 M (as opposed to $330 M in 2012).

 

Further refined cost estimates are forthcoming for servicing infrastructure (including transportation), as well as community services and facilities. A comprehensive package of infrastructure cost estimates will be included in the final report on the Port Lands Planning Framework in 2015, along with a recommended funding and financing strategy.

 

Fifth, with respect to funding and financing, the City's 2013 Development Charges By-law included rate increases related to the first ten years of Port Lands flood protection and related infrastructure projects.  The background work for a relatively minor Area-Specific Development Charge By-Law has been initiated and staff are expected to report back on this in the first quarter of 2015.

 

Development Charge revenues will be an important contribution to the costs of flood protection and related infrastructure over time.  Additional funding is needed to cover the non-DC shares and contributions will be pursued from area landowners.  These contributions could also help deal with up-front investment requirements.  However, funding contributions will also be needed from government and there is a need to initiate discussions with the federal and provincial governments on each contributing a one-third share of approximately $800 M in total flood protection and related infrastructure costs (approximately $270 M each).

 

The Port Lands Land Planning Framework concludes that the Commissioners Street Waste Transfer Station should be relocated to facilitate redevelopment in the Film Studio District. This conclusion should be reviewed by staff of Solid Waste Management Services, within the context of the larger Solid Waste Long Term Waste Management Strategy that is now underway.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 5, 2014) Report and Appendices 1, 2 and 4 from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on Port Lands Acceleration Initiative Phase 2 - Progress Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70243.pdf
(June 5, 2014) Appendix 3 - Port Lands Planning Framework: Land Use Direction - Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70270.pdf
(June 5, 2014) Appendix 3 - Port Lands Planning Framework: Land Use Direction - Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70403.pdf
(June 5, 2014) Appendix 3 - Port Lands Planning Framework: Land Use Direction - Part 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70404.pdf
Presentation on Port Lands Acceleration Initiative Phase 2 - Progress Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70799.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 4, 2014) Supplementary report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B on Port Lands Acceleration Initiative Phase 2 - Progress Report (PG34.11a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71277.pdf

Speakers

Cynthia Wilkey, Chair, West Don Lands Committee
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(June 17, 2014) Letter from Cynthia Wilkey, Chair, West Don Lands Committee (PG.New.PG34.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48266.pdf
(June 19, 2014) Letter from Paul Bronfman, Chairman, Pinewood Toronto Studios and Chairman/CEO of Comweb Group Inc. and William F. White International Inc. (PG.New.PG34.11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48296.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 9, 2014) E-mail from George Bell (CC.New.PG34.11.3)

PG34.14 - Protecting and Increasing Access to Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Spaces (POPS)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PG34.14.2 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The City Planning Division recommends that:

 

1.         City Council endorse the “Draft Urban Design Guidelines for Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Spaces (POPS)” contained in Attachment 1 of the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and direct Staff to utilize them in assessing future development applications.

 

2.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning to require as a standard condition of Site Plan Approval for future development applications, as well as those development applications currently under review, that include Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Spaces (POPS), to incorporate POPS signage as per the POPS signage template contained in Attachment 2 of the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Urban Design Guidelines for POPS as may be required.

Origin

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council adopt the city-wide "Draft Urban Design Guidelines for Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Spaces (POPS)" (Attachment No. 1).

 

These Guidelines will assist the development community and Staff in locating, designing and furnishing POPS. The POPS website will continue to be updated as POPS are secured and built through the planning process and the POPS signage will become a standard component of all developments that includes POPS.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 22, 2014) Report and Attachment 2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Protecting and Increasing Access to Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Spaces (POPS)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70176.pdf
Attachment 1: Draft Urban Design Guidelines for Privately and Publicly Accessible Spaces
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70177.pdf
Presentation on Protecting and Increasing Access to Privately Owned Publicly-Accessible Spaces (POPS)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70817.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 18, 2014) Letter from Danielle Chin Senior Planner, Policy & Government Relations, Building Industry and Land Development Association (PG.New.PG34.14.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48300.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 4, 2014) E-mail from Mel Winch (CC.Supp.PG34.14.2)

PG34.15 - Restructuring of the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct staff to process heritage property tax rebate applications received in 2015 for the 2014 tax year, in accordance with Chapter 103, Heritage, Article VII of the Municipal Code, for properties that have participated in the program at any time since the 2010 tax year.

 

2.         City Council direct that the total annual costs of the municipal portion of rebates provided for the 2014 tax year shall not exceed $2 million.

 

3.         City Council set a maximum rebate for the 2015 tax year of $500,000 for Part IV designated commercial and industrial properties subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement and $50,000 for Part V designated contributing commercial and industrial properties subject to a Maintenance and Preservation Agreement.

 

4.         City Council direct staff to implement a standardized Maintenance and Conservation Agreement as described in this report and in accordance with section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to be used exclusively for Part V designated commercial and industrial properties identified as contributing properties within the corresponding Heritage Conservation District Plan.

 

5.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director to enter into standard Heritage Easement Agreements and Maintenance and Conservation Agreements, as described in this report and in a form and content satisfactory to the City Solicitor for the purposes of the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program.

 

6.         City Council direct staff to amend the eligibility criteria for the Heritage Grant Program to exclude commercial and industrial heritage properties designated under Parts IV and/or V of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council to extend the current Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program for those properties that have participated in the program at any time since the 2010 tax year, for the 2014 taxation year and to amend Chapter 103 of the Municipal Code to implement a new Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program structure as described in this report for the 2015 taxation year that:

 

a.         provides rebates of 40 percent of taxes paid on designated commercial and industrial properties that are subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement or Maintenance and Conservation Agreement

b.         is capped at 50 percent of Eligible Maintenance and Conservation Costs

c.         is subject to a maximum annual rebate of $500,000.00 for Part IV designated properties, and $50,000.00 annually for Part V designated properties for a maximum of two consecutive years within the term of a 5 year Maintenance and Conservation Agreement

d.         requires a minimum expenditure equivalent to 20 percent of taxes paid.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that Council adopt a new program structure for the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program (HPTRP). The new program structure is the result of analysing and assessing other tax rebate models; the effects, advantage and disadvantages of the current model and extensive community consultation.

 

The revised program structure provides tax rebates for costs related to eligible maintenance and conservation work for commercial and industrial properties that are designated under either Part IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act (OHA).

 

The new HPTRP structure will provide a rebate of 40 percent of taxes paid, capped at 50 percent of eligible maintenance and conservation costs, and subject to a maximum annual rebate of $500,000.00 for Part IV designated properties and $50,000.00 per year for Part V designated properties (for a maximum of two consecutive years within a 5 year period). Applicants are also required to demonstrate that there is a minimum expenditure equivalent to 20% of taxes paid for properties subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement or Maintenance and Conservation Agreement and that all other program requirements are met.

 

The new program structure will create better tracking and key performance indicators, increase transparency and fairness, and improve processing time. The new program structure will assist property owners in developing maintenance and conservation programs consistent with Official Plan goals for heritage incentive programs and heritage conservation excellence.

 

This report also recommends that the Heritage Grant Program be amended to exclude commercial and industrial heritage properties designated under Parts IV and/or V of the Ontario Heritage Act. This will allow the Heritage Grant Program to focus grants on residential and tax-exempt properties such as places of worship.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Restructuring of the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70172.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(June 18, 2014) Letter from Michael B. Vaughan, Q.C. (PG.New.PG34.15.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48280.pdf

15a - Restructuring of the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program

Origin
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 5, 2014, considered a report (May 28, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, regarding Restructuring of the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on the Restructuring of the Heritage Property Tax Rebate Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70300.pdf

PG34.16 - Approval of 2014 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that: 

 

1.         City Council approve awards for the 2014 Toronto Heritage Grant Program for the 18 heritage properties in the City of Toronto, as set out below, to assist in funding the scope of restoration work generally described in Attachment No.1 of the report (May 12, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of the Toronto Heritage Grant Program previously approved by City Council.

 

a.         14 Elm Street, institutional, $5,385

b.         6 Fern Avenue, house, $5,000

c.         12 Geneva Avenue, house, $9,750

d.         198 First Avenue, house, $10,000

e.         407 Huron Street, house, $10,000

f.          60 Lowther Avenue, house, $5,000

g.         41Nanton Avenue, house, $10,000

h.         39 Old Brewery Lane, converted factory, $24,000

i.          99 Old Forest Hill Road, house, $10,000

j.          510 Ontario Street, house, $10,000

k.         2 Prospect Street, multi-unit building, $21,750

l.          257 Queen Street West, commercial, $25,000

m.        400 Roncesvalles Avenue, theatre, $75,000

n.         1 Rose Avenue, house, $5,000

o.         3 Rose Avenue, house, $5,000

p.         21 Rose Avenue, house, $10,000

q.         63 Tranby Avenue, $10,000

r.          330 Wellesley Street East, house, $10,000

 

2.         City Council direct that the use of the grant awards outlined in recommendation (1) above, be limited to only the proposed restoration work approved by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and that issuing of the grant award be subject to the grant recipient satisfying all conditions as set out in the Letter of Understanding between the City and the grant recipient.

Origin

(May 12, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the recommended grant awards for the 2014 Toronto Heritage Grant Program as set out in this report. 

 

The Toronto Heritage Grant Program provides matching grant funds for eligible heritage restoration work to owners of properties in the City of Toronto designated under Part IV or V of the Ontario Heritage Act.  The Toronto Heritage Grant Program is administered by Heritage Preservation Services, City Planning Division.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 12, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Approval of 2014 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70185.pdf

16a - Approval of 2014 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards

Origin
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 5, 2014, considered a report (May 12, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, regarding Approval of 2014 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards.

Background Information (Committee)
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on the Approval of 2014 Toronto Heritage Grant Awards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70301.pdf

PG34.17 - Design Review Panel: Appointment of New Members

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual, including municipal or local board employees

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the recommended new members for the Design Review Panel listed in Confidential Attachment 1 of the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to serve for a period of two years or until their successors are appointed;

 

2.         City Council approve appointment of the alternate candidate listed on Confidential Attachment 1 of the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in order to fill a mid-term vacancy, if the need arises; and

 

3.         City Council approve the public release of the confidential information contained within Confidential Attachment 1 of the report (May 22, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

Origin

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

The Design Review Panel (DRP) is a Divisional Advisory Body administered by the City Planning Division.  The purpose of this report is to recommend approval of three new members to fill vacancies created through the end-of-term of three current members.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 22, 2014) Report from Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Design Review Panel: Appointment of New Members
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70174.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Design Review Panel - Recommended New Members

Background Information (City Council)

Confidential Attachment 1 - Design Review Panel - Recommended New Members - made public on July 21, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71524.pdf

PG34.18 - Official Plan Review: Draft Policies for Healthy Neighbourhoods, Neighbourhoods, and Apartment Neighbourhoods

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that the draft Official Plan policies appended to the report (May 20, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in Attachments 1 and 2 to be used as the basis for public consultation.

 

2.         City Council direct staff to conduct open house(s) in each community council district of the City and meet with key stakeholders including resident and ratepayer associations and  Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) to obtain comments and feedback regarding the draft changes to the policies for residential areas contained in Attachments 1 and 2 of the report (May 20, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

3.         City Council direct staff to report back in the first quarter of 2015 on the findings of the public consultation and proposed policies resulting from the consultations.

Origin

(May 20, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This reports presents draft policies with respect to the Healthy Neighbourhoods, Neighbourhoods and Apartment Neighbourhoods sections of the Official Plan for the purpose of public consultation as part of the Five Year Review of the Official Plan. The draft policies are intended to strengthen and clarify the existing policies that protect the character and scale of existing established residential communities within Neighbourhoods and Apartment Neighbourhoods.

 

The draft policies add clarity to the policy framework as it pertains to a number of areas including limited infill development on sites with an existing apartment building(s) in Neighbourhoods and Apartment Neighbourhoods where there is sufficient surplus space to accommodate additional development while preserving amenities for residents of existing apartment buildings.

 

The draft policies also implement the City's Tower Renewal Initiative by encouraging small scale retail, institutional uses and community facilities on sites with high rise apartment buildings surrounded by large open space and isolated from community, institutional and retail facilities.  The draft policies encourage the renovation and retrofitting of older multi-residential apartment buildings.

 

The draft policies have been formulated to address issues raised as a result of feedback received at the initial series of public open houses at the commencement of the Five Year Review of the Official Plan in the fall of 2011, consultations with the Tower Renewal Office and internal consultations within the City Planning Division.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 20, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Official Plan Review: Draft Policies for Healthy Neighbourhoods, Neighbourhoods, and Apartment Neighbourhoods
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70183.pdf

Speakers

Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto
Michael Rosenberg

PG34.19 - Report on the Condo Consultation

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Province to amend the Condominium Act to provide for greater flexibility to change a condo declaration or by-laws to address changing parking circumstances and needs in a condominium.

 

2.         City Council request the Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) and the Canadian Condominium Institute to request their members to consider the need for flexible parking regulations in condominium declarations and by-laws in the initial planning of new condominiums.

 

3.         City Council forward the consultant's comments regarding building quality and construction quality to the Ministry of Consumer Services, Tarion and Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD) for their consideration.

 

4.         City Council forward the consultant's recommendation to encourage the building industry to designate smoke-free buildings (or floors/zones within buildings) by including a smoke-free status in the condominium documents to Building Industry and Land Development Association (BILD).

 

5.         City Council request the Province to clarify Section 45 of the Municipal Elections Act to require condominium corporations to allow public access to voting places in their condominium.

 

6.         City Council request the Canadian Condominium Institute to request their members to consider a provision in the condominium declaration stating that non-residents of the condominium will have access to voting places in the building.

 

7.         City Council request that the Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration undertake a pilot project to develop a community development tool-kit to assist condominium residents to strengthen the 'social tissue' in their buildings.

 

8.        City Council request that the City Planning Division with the City Manager's Engage Toronto IT project test the use of an on-line idea manager software for condo residents to share ideas about how they have dealt with issues in their condos.

 

9.       City Council request the Province to consider a broad information sharing and idea facilitation role for the proposed Condo Office.

 

10.       City Council request the Tower Renewal Office to investigate the potential use of the STEP Program and energy efficiency retrofit financing mechanisms for condo buildings.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.         Requested City Planning to review the experience using the tall buildings guidelines and report to Planning and Growth Management Committee on the appropriateness of incorporating some of the standards in the zoning by-law.

 

2.         Requested the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to develop a protocol to facilitate the short term lease or use of ground floor retail space in condo buildings by arts and culture groups while the owner of the space seeks to lease to a long term tenant.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report provides an overview and summary of the consultations with condominium occupants carried out in 2013. It presents the major issues identified during the consultations and responses to them.

 

The feedback from the attendees at the meetings was generally positive. They appreciated being engaged in a process where their condo related experiences could be shared with City staff in an effort to improve the quality of life in their communities.

 

The City's consultant for the consultation presented 36 recommendations to address the issues. This report, in conjunction with Attachment 1, provides a response to each of the recommendations. Some responses result in recommendations for further action. Others are actions that will be implemented by staff as part of existing work programs or initiatives. Many of the issues are already being addressed, and the report indicates where this is so. The Downtown Infrastructure and Growth Strategy now underway will address many of the issues as they relate to the Downtown.

 

Five general issues stood out as either those most important to the participants or to improving their day-to-day condo living experience:

-           Coordinating new development with services and infrastructure and associated concerns regarding traffic congestion, transit crowding and lack of green spaces;

-           Amenities for dogs (and other pets);

-           Parking for visitors;

-           Community building; and

-           Information sharing.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Report on the Condo Consultation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70255.pdf
Attachment 2 - The Consultant's Recommendations Report (January 2014)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70256.pdf

PG34.24 - Greenbelt Urban River Valley Designation in Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council reconfirm its in-principle support for designating portions of the Don and Humber Rivers and the Etobicoke Creek as Urban River Valley under the Greenbelt Act.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.         Directed the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, to develop a map of lands suitable for Urban River Valley designations using existing mapping resources.

 

2.         Directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to discuss methods for reducing and/or defraying cost with the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing and the Friends of the Greenbelt Foundation.

 

3.         Directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to submit a report on the results of Recommendations 1 and 2 above to the February 2015 meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

Origin

(May 2, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report responds to a request from City Council to begin the process of making an application to the Province to designate public lands in the Don and Humber River and Etobicoke Creek valleys as part of the Greenbelt Area under the new Urban River Valley designation.

 

The report reviews the application process and implications of adding public lands to the Greenbelt through the Urban River Valley designation and provides cost information to designate public lands located within the Don and Humber River and Etobicoke Creek corridors that meet the environmentally significant areas (ESA) criteria. Designating public land in Toronto as Urban River Valley would not provide any additional policy protection to these lands and would result in a discontinuous patchwork of land being recognized as part of the Greenbelt. The report recommends an alternative approach that will achieve the goal of recognizing the importance of the Don and Humber Rivers and Etobicoke Creek as river valley connections between the Greenbelt Area and Lake Ontario. This approach will recognize river valley connection in the Official Plan, provide a strong foundation for raising public awareness about the importance of river valley connections and can be done at no additional cost to the City.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 2, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 - 4 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on the Greenbelt Urban River Valley Designation in Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-70689.pdf

Speakers

Franz Hartmann, Toronto Environmental Alliance
Councillor Gord Perks

Communications (Committee)

(May 23, 2014) Letter from Brian Bailey, President, Citizens Concerned about the Future of the Etobicoke Waterfront (PG.Supp.PG34.24.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48084.pdf
(May 27, 2014) Letter from John P. Wilson (PG.Supp.PG34.24.2)
(May 28, 2014) Letter from Brian Bailey, President, Citizens Concerned about the Future of the Etobicoke Waterfront (PG.Supp.PG34.24.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48082.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Letter from Andrew McCammon, On behalf of the Board, The Taylor Massey Project (PG.Supp.PG34.24.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48219.pdf
(June 16, 2014) Letter from David Crombie, Toronto Lands Corporation (PG.New.PG34.24.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48270.pdf
(June 19, 2014) Letter from Erin Shapero, Program Manager - Land and Water, Environmental Defence (PG.New.PG34.24.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pg/comm/communicationfile-48276.pdf

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 32

PW32.5 - Proposed Contra-flow Bicycle Lanes on Dixon Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Bills 700 and 701 have been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of a westbound contra-flow bicycle lane on Dixon Avenue, from Woodbine Avenue to Lockwood Road and an eastbound contra-flow bicycle lane from Kingston Road to Lockwood Road, as described in Appendix 1 – Amendments to Bicycle Lane Designations, attached to the report (May 15, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

2.         City Council approve the amendments to traffic and parking regulations required to install contra-flow bicycle lanes on Dixon Avenue, as described in Appendix 2 – Amendments to Traffic and Parking Regulations, attached to the report (May 15, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

Origin

(May 15, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to recommend the installation of contra-flow bicycle lanes on Dixon Avenue, from Kingston Road to Woodbine Avenue. Currently there are bicycle lanes on Dundas Street East which are part of a continuous bikeway that connects cyclists from River Street in the west to Kingston Road in the east. The proposed Dixon Avenue contra-flow bicycle lane would extend the bikeway further east to Woodbine Avenue and provide access to the neighbourhoods south and east of Kingston Road.

 

There will be no impact on parking or traffic operations as a result of the installation of the proposed contra-flow bicycle lanes. At the public consultation meeting community participants were generally supportive of the proposed contra-flow bicycle lane.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 15, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 and 2 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Proposed Contra-flow Bicycle Lanes on Dixon Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70105.pdf
(May 15, 2014) Appendix 3 - Proposed Contra-flow Bicycle Lanes on Dixon Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70204.pdf

Speakers

David Oppenheim
Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Michael Polanyi (PW.New.PW32.5.1)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Andrew Macdonald and Sally Bliss (PW.New.PW32.5.2)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Michael Werneburg (PW.New.PW32.5.3)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Kathleen Mackey (PW.New.PW32.5.4)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Michelle Gryguc Wolfson (PW.New.PW32.5.5)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Frank Loritz (PW.New.PW32.5.6)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Brigid Wright (PW.New.PW32.5.7)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Cynthia Wilkey (PW.New.PW32.5.8)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Catherine Peck (PW.New.PW32.5.9)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Brendan Morrissey (PW.New.PW32.5.10)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Susan Crofts (PW.New.PW32.5.11)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Bruce Crofts (PW.New.PW32.5.12)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Michael Holloway (PW.New.PW32.5.13)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Johanne Moller (PW.New.PW32.5.14)
(June 13, 2014) Letter from Davis and Rhonda Costas-Mirza (PW.New.PW32.5.15)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Robert Matthew (PW.New.PW32.5.16)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Louisa Mursell (PW.New.PW32.5.17)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Camilla Sutton (PW.New.PW32.5.18)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Michael McCreesh (PW.New.PW32.5.19)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Chris Hunsburger (PW.New.PW32.5.20)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Brenda Morse (PW.New.PW32.5.21)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Tom Auger (PW.New.PW32.5.22)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Perry de Man (PW.New.PW32.5.23)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Jonathan Vacher (PW.New.PW32.5.24)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Dale Hildebrand (PW.New.PW32.5.25)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Mark Strickland (PW.New.PW32.5.26)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Deepti Pushkarna (PW.New.PW32.5.27)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Ute Lehrer (PW.New.PW32.5.28)
(June 14, 2014) E-mail from Michael Waglay (PW.New.PW32.5.29)
(June 15, 2014) E-mail from Mary Ann Neary (PW.New.PW32.5.30)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Jason Self (PW.New.PW32.5.31)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Dave Strasser (PW.New.PW32.5.32)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Adrienne Cote (PW.New.PW32.5.33)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Ross Macduff (PW.New.PW32.5.34)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Susana Molinolo (PW.New.PW32.5.35)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Hans Looije, President, Beach Triangle Residents Association (PW.New.PW32.5.36)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Randy Tsomis (PW.New.PW32.5.37)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Sabrina Bowman (PW.New.PW32.5.38)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Douglas Yardley (PW.New.PW32.5.39)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from David Oppenheim (PW.New.PW32.5.40)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from James Monaghan (PW.New.PW32.5.41)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Zoey Zoric (PW.New.PW32.5.42)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Bojan Zoric (PW.New.PW32.5.43)

PW32.7 - Eglinton Avenue East - High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
25 - Don Valley West, 26 - Don Valley West, 34 - Don Valley East, 35 - Scarborough Southwest, 36 - Scarborough Southwest, 37 - Scarborough Centre, 38 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
Bill 673 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve an amendment to Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, to include a definition of a High Occupancy Vehicle carrying two or more people (HOV2+) and to allow for HOV2+ operation on Eglinton Avenue East, between Leslie Street and Cedar Drive, as contained in Appendix 3 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

2.         City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to monitor the operations and impacts of the regulatory change to the HOV lanes on Eglinton Avenue East, between Leslie Street and Cedar Drive, and report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in 2015 on the findings, as well as a citywide strategy on the HOV network, operations and regulations.

 

3.         City Council approve the removal of the HOV2+ lanes on Eglinton Avenue East, between Leslie Street and Kennedy Road (the easterly limit of the LRT), and their replacement with general purpose lanes, in conjunction with the commencement of construction of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT along this section of Eglinton Avenue.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The City has a limited network of High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes which are lanes on arterial roads that are restricted during peak periods for use by buses, taxis and, in some cases, vehicles with three or more (HOV3+) occupants.  The purpose of HOV lanes is to make transit service and travel in multi-occupant vehicles faster, more attractive, and more reliable than operating in general traffic.

 

There are currently HOV lanes on Eglinton Avenue East from Leslie Street to Cedar Drive (east of Markham Road) which are provided, in part, to improve the service and reliability of the TTC buses operating along this route.  These HOV lanes will not be required for TTC bus service in the future on the sections of Eglinton Avenue East adjacent to the Eglinton Crosstown LRT.  Therefore, the HOV lanes will be removed between Leslie Street and Kennedy Road (the easterly limit of the LRT) during construction of the LRT to minimize the impact of this construction activity on traffic operations and service in this corridor.

 

The General Manager of Transportation Services was requested to assess the impacts of removing the HOV lanes along this section Eglinton Avenue East under its current configuration, prior to the commencement of the LRT construction.  As a result of this assessment, this report recommends the retention of the HOV lanes until the commencement of LRT construction but that, prior to their removal, the restrictions to the use of these lanes be converted from HOV3+ to HOV2+.  This regulatory change is expected to improve traffic conditions along Eglinton Avenue East, while maintaining some level of priority for transit vehicles and HOV's.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 30, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 to 3 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Eglinton Avenue East - High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70186.pdf

PW32.8 - Steeles Avenue Widening (Tapscott Road to Ninth Line) - Principles of a Cost-Sharing and Implementation Agreement

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant approval to City staff to negotiate, enter into and execute an agreement with the Regional Municipality of York for the widening of Steeles Avenue from a point approximately 400m east of Tapscott Road extending easterly to Ninth Line, and the 50/50 cost-sharing of such widening, on terms and conditions generally as set out in Appendix 2 to the report (June 3, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council forward the report (June 3, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services to the Clerks of the City of Markham, City of Vaughan and the Regional Municipality of York.

Origin

(June 3, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

Steeles Avenue extends approximately 40 kilometres across the north limit of the city from the Region of Peel in the west to the Region of Durham in the east.  Situated entirely within the City of Toronto, the northern limit of the Steeles Avenue right-of-way limit defines the city's boundary with the Regional Municipality of York to the north.  Approximately 650,000 vehicles cross Steeles Avenue both in the inbound and outbound directions on a typical weekday 24-hour period. 

 

Recognizing the importance of this key arterial road to both municipalities, negotiations have been ongoing for several years to assess the opportunity for the sharing of capital improvements and operating and maintenance costs.  Although progress has been made in this regard, at this time there has been no cost-sharing agreement reached between the two municipalities.

 

In the meantime, the Minister of Environment has issued a Notice of Approval to York to proceed with the "Donald Cousens Parkway to Morningside Avenue Link", including the widening of a section of Steeles Avenue approximately 1.5 km in length from Tapscott Road easterly to Ninth Line.  The purpose of this report is to recommend a series of principles that would form the basis of an agreement between the City of Toronto and the Regional Municipality of York for the widening and cost-sharing of this 1.5 km section of Steeles Avenue.  These principles have been developed in consultation with York staff, and pending approval by York Region Council, would be used to develop the comprehensive agreement with York for the maintenance, improvements and management of the entire 40-km length of Steeles Avenue, including cost-sharing. 

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2014) Report and Appendices 1 and 2 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Steeles Avenue Widening (Tapscott Road to Ninth Line) - Principles of a Cost-Sharing and Implementation Agreement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70184.pdf

PW32.9 - City of Toronto / MTO Agreement for the Maintenance and Operation of Ministry Owned Traffic Control Devices

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
2 - Etobicoke North, 3 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 10 - York Centre, 11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 23 - Willowdale, 24 - Willowdale, 25 - Don Valley West, 33 - Don Valley East, 34 - Don Valley East, 38 - Scarborough Centre, 40 - Scarborough Agincourt, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 43 - Scarborough East, 44 - Scarborough East

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant approval to negotiate, enter into and execute a new agreement with the Ontario Ministry of Transportation for operation and maintenance activities associated with signs, signals and zone painting on MTO expressway ramps intersecting with City of Toronto arterial roads, generally as set out in the report (May 27, 2014) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, and on such other terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Transportation Services, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

This report seeks City Council approval on a revised agreement between the City of Toronto and the Ontario Ministry of Transportation (MTO) for the City to carry out the ongoing operation and maintenance of traffic controls devices (e.g. signage, traffic signals, and zone-painting) on MTO expressway ramps intersecting with City of Toronto arterial roads. The specific locations are identified in Schedule 'A' of the draft agreement appended to this report.

 

The MTO and the City have been operating under an existing agreement which came into effect on April 1, 1997. This existing agreement requires necessary revisions to recognize changing technology, conditions and constraints. New terms and conditions have been negotiated between staff of both respective jurisdictions and are reflected in the draft agreement appended to this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 27, 2014) Report and Attachment from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on City of Toronto/MTO Agreement for the Maintenance and Operation of Ministry Owned Traffic Control Devices
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70094.pdf

PW32.10 - Traffic Control Signals - Yonge Street and Roehampton Avenue / Orchard View Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 22 - St. Paul's

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Yonge Street and Roehampton/Orchard View Boulevard.

 

2.         City Council prohibit eastbound right turns on a red signal at all times from Orchard View Boulevard to Yonge Street.

 

3.         City Council prohibit westbound right turns on a red signal at all times from Roehampton Avenue to Yonge Street.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Yonge Street and Roehampton Avenue/Orchard View Boulevard.

 

As part of the review and site plan approval for the development of 2263-2287 Yonge Street, 8-10 Eglinton Avenue, 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue, necessary improvements to Yonge Street and Roehampton Avenue/Orchard View Boulevard were identified to accommodate increased traffic and pedestrian demands in the vicinity of this development, primarily, the installation of traffic control signals at this intersection.  The installation of these traffic control signals will enhance safety for pedestrians and motorists both during construction and once the development is complete, and will result in the loss of approximately eight on-street parking spaces in total, on the east and west sides of Yonge Street.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transporation Services, on Traffic Control Signals - Yonge Street and Roehampton Avenue/Orchard View Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70087.pdf
(May 28, 2014) Attachment 1 - Proposed Signalized Intersection Location Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70205.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Josh Matlow

Communications (Committee)

(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Alex Korobchevsky (PW.New.PW32.10.1)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from John Taranu, Cycle Toronto Midtown: Ward 22 Advocacy Group (PW.New.PW32.10.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-48250.pdf
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Lyndsey Gott (PW.New.PW32.10.3)

PW32.11 - Algonquin Island Bridge - Environmental Assessment Study

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to issue a Notice of Completion and to file the Environmental Study Report (ESR) for the Algonquin Island Bridge Environmental Assessment Study in the public record for a minimum 30 days in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. 

Origin

(May 12, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Algonquin Island Bridge, a timber trestle structure connecting Algonquin Island to Ward's Island, was constructed in 1938 and currently serves pedestrians, cyclists, and service vehicles. The bridge underwent extensive rehabilitation in 1998, including construction of a new deck; however, recent bridge inspections have identified some decay in the timber piles and a need for additional repairs or possible replacement.

 

Due to the age and historical significance of this structure, an Environmental Assessment was required to determine how best to address the condition and rehabilitation needs of this structure. As a result of the Environmental Assessment, which included extensive public consultation, it is recommended that the bridge be replaced in its existing location with a new structure of similar design with new materials, so that it continues to serve all users and satisfy Canadian bridge standards.

 

The cost of replacing the bridge structure, estimated to be $4.3 million, as well as any required interim repairs, will be funded by the City's Bridge Rehabilitation Program.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 12, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the General Manager, Transportation Services, on Algonquin Island Bridge - Environmental Assessment Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70098.pdf

PW32.13 - Gardiner East Contaminated Soil Monitoring and Review Committee: Final Outcomes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council formally thank the South Riverdale Environmental Liaison Committee for their participation in the Gardiner East Contaminated Soil Monitoring and Review Committee.

 

2.          City Council accept the 2009 Aqua Terre Solutions and the 2010 Terrapex Environmental reports as the final soil and groundwater monitoring reports regarding the capped Areas "A" and "B", as shown in Figure 1 of the report (June 3, 2014) from Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, necessary to complete the environmental requirements of the 1999-2002 Gardiner East Dismantling Project.

 

3.          City Council direct Transportation Services and Toronto Transit Commission staff to continue to ensure that the recommendations for long-term (perpetual) inspections and repair of the soil caps in Areas "A" and "B", as shown in Figure 1 of the report (June 3, 2014) from Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, in the City's rights-of-way and within lands under the Toronto Transit Commission's operational control are conducted annually.

 

4.         City Council direct the appropriate staff to ensure that all relevant documents and materials associated with the remediation of contaminated soils in the areas identified as a result of the dismantling of the F.G. Gardiner Expressway at Lake Shore Boulevard East are publicly available at the Jones Branch of the Toronto Public Library, located at 118 Jones Avenue, or other local branch of the Toronto Public Library and on the City's website.

 

5.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, through the Division's Public Realm Section, to design and erect information signage in proximity to Area "A" by October 2014 and Area "B" by the spring of 2015, based on the proposal submitted by Councillor Fletcher contained in Figure 2 of the report (June 3, 2014) from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

6.         City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission to report through their Liaison Committee on the Final Environmental Reports on the reinstatement of the soil cap for Areas A and B, as shown in Figure 1, appended to the report (June 3, 2014) from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

7.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee upon completion of the TTC's construction activity in 2015 on:

 

a.         the community consultation that the TTC undertook on the environmental aspects of their project;

b.         the status of the final condition of the soil cap in Areas A and B, reinstated by the TTC, as outlined in the TTC's Final Environmental Reports;

c.         the need for ongoing soil and groundwater quality monitoring (within Areas A and B); and

d.         the need for ongoing consultation with the Gardiner East Contaminated Soil Monitoring and Review Committee.

Origin

(June 3, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide: (1) the status of the two capped areas along Lake Shore Boulevard East, which were the subject of remediation activities after the dismantling of the eastern portion of the F.G. Gardiner Expressway was completed in 2001; (2) a mechanism for further monitoring and reporting requirements on the affected areas; and (3) an implementation plan and timeline for the installation of information signage near the capped areas. The report also highlights the need to ensure that all documents related to the mitigation of soil contamination in these areas remain publicly available.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 and 2 from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Gardiner East Contaminated Soil Monitoring and Review Committee: Final Outcomes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70164.pdf

Speakers

William Brown
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(June 16, 2014) Letter from William E. Brown (PW.New.PW32.13.1)
(June 17, 2014) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30 - Toronto Danforth (PW.New.PW32.13.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/comm/communicationfile-48238.pdf

PW32.14 - Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Principle 5.1.4 in Attachment 1 to the report (June 3, 2014) from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services by deleting the words "Only lands greater than 100 m2 in size may utilize the < 1.0 m width exemption" so that it reads:

 

"5.1.4. Exemptions regarding applicability of the City's procedures and criteria to small parcels of land for land conveyances under the Planning Act will be assessed first by size (to be either less than or greater than 100 m2) as summarized in revised Table 1."

 

2.         City Council adopt the "Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act" as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (June 3, 2014) from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, as amended by Part 1 above.

Origin

(June 3, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services Division

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek Council approval of a City policy titled "Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act". This policy updates and consolidates the City of Toronto's procedures and criteria for the acceptance of potentially contaminated lands conveyed to the City as a condition of a Planning Act application approval.

 

The policy formalizes processes that have been in place and applied for the past twelve years and updates those processes by incorporating the Ministry of the Environment's recently updated requirements for contaminated lands.

 

The outcome of adopting the policy will: (1) provide more certainty and clarity to City staff and the development industry about the City’s expectations and requirements for accepting potentially contaminated lands; (2) continue to minimize the City’s liabilities related to accepting conveyed lands; and (3) continue to safeguard public health and the environment.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 3, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, on Policy for Accepting Potentially Contaminated Lands to be Conveyed to the City under the Planning Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70165.pdf
(June 18, 2014) Revised Table 1 - Application Requirements - Procedures and Criteria of the Peer Review Process for Land Conveyances under the Planning Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70829.pdf

Speakers

Rachael Lee, Davies Ward Phillips and Vineberg LLP

PW32.15 - Financial Plan for the City of Toronto's Municipal Drinking Water License Renewal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the Financial Plan (Attachment 1 to the report dated May 28, 2014 from the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer) prepared for the City of Toronto's Municipal Drinking Water System, in accordance with Ontario Regulation 453/07, for submission to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal  Affairs and Housing, in compliance with the requirements of the Municipal Drinking Water License renewal process.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain City Council approval of a Financial Plan prepared as a condition of the Municipal Drinking Water Licence renewal process under the Safe Drinking Water Act, 2002.  A Municipal Drinking Water Licence is an approval issued by the Ontario Ministry of the Environment for the operation of a municipal drinking water system.  The City of Toronto's current Drinking Water Licence expires on February 16, 2015.

 

The Financial Plan for the City of Toronto’s drinking water system has been prepared in accordance with Ontario Regulation 453/07 and must be approved by a resolution of Council for submission to the Ontario Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing by August 17, 2014.

Background Information (Committee)

(May 28, 2014) Report and Attachments 1 to 3 from the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, on Financial Plan for the City of Toronto's Municipal Drinking Water License Renewal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70178.pdf

PW32.19 - Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program for Non-Residential Charitable Sector

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Will be considered as the first item on Friday July 11.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.          City Council approve the implementation of a Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program for charities who are Non-Residential customers of the City’s Solid Waste Management Services.

 

2.          City Council approve the elimination of the separate Reduced Rate Donated Goods Program as the proposed Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program addresses this need.

 

3.          City Council consider the impact of implementing the Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program during the 2015 Operating Budget process, with this program taking effect in April 2015.

 

4.          City Council direct the City Solicitor to bring forward a bill directly to City Council to enable the cancellation of the Reduced Rate Donated Goods Program and creation of the Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program.

 

5.         City Council request the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in two years as to the level of diversion compliance reflected in the audit process.

Origin

(June 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services

Summary

In 2012, City Council approved the Solid Waste Management Donated Items Reduced Rate for Non-Residential Special Category (Reduced Rate Donated Goods Program) for Charities, Institutions and Religious Organizations (CIRO ) that receive publically donated goods.  However, many organizations that are Non-Residential customers but do not offer a donated goods program have expressed concerns about the impact of the rate on their financial stability. 

 

As requested by City Council at its meeting of December 16, 2013, staff explored options to mitigate the impact of solid waste rates on Toronto’s charitable sector.

 

Four options were considered:

 

1.         A Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program for approved Non-Residential customers who are registered as charitable organizations.  Charities would be eligible for this full rate waiver, regardless of whether they operate programs that rely on donated goods.  Therefore, the current Reduced Rate Donated Goods Program would no longer be necessary.  The Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program would be incentive based.  Applicants would need to demonstrate a commitment to waste diversion strategies to be eligible for a 100 percent waiver on the solid waste rate based on a waste audit compliance inspection.

 

2.         A separate Grant Program based in Social Development, Finance and Administration.  Organizations would submit a grant application to demonstrate an inability to pay the Solid Waste Management Services rate along with their waste diversion strategies.

 

3.         A separate Non-Residential Rate for Charities and Non-profit organizations.  This universally applied rate would be lower than the current Non-Residential Rate Structure in recognition of the services provided by these organizations to communities in the City of Toronto.

 

4.         Continue with the current Non-Residential Rate Structure as approved by City Council in 2012 as phased in for 2015 and the Reduced Rate Donated Goods Program for approved Non-Residential customers.

 

This report recommends Option 1, the Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program beginning in April 2015 as it:

 

-           recognizes the contribution that charities make to the City;

 

-           mitigates the additional financial pressure that the new rate presents to the sector;

 

-           encourages the sector to strengthen their waste reduction strategies and participation in the City’s diversion programs; and

 

-           decreases the administrative burden to the City to implement

Background Information (Committee)

(June 4, 2014) Report from the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, on Waste Diversion Rate Waiver Program for Non-Residential Charitable Sector
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70226.pdf

Speakers

John Campey, Executive Director, Social Planning Toronto

PW32.22 - Award of Request for Quotation No. 6033-14-3092 for Solid Waste Curbside Collection Contract in Etobicoke Area (District 1)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke North, 3 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Communication PW32.22.1 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council in accordance with Section 195-15 of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 195 (Purchasing By-law), authorize the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to award and enter into an agreement with Miller Waste Systems Inc., being the lowest bidder meeting specifications for RFQ 6033-14-3092 for curbside collection, transportation and off-loading of materials in the Etobicoke area for a period of six (6) years commencing on July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2021 with an option to extend the initial contract for two (2) additional separate one (1) year periods, for a grand total contract value of $88,606,843.87 including estimated annual adjustments for consumer price index (CPI) net of HST recoveries. 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to consider Item PW32.22 Award of Request for Quotation No. 6033-14-3092 for Solid Waste Curbside Collection Contract in Etobicoke Area (District 1) as it relates to litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the City or a local board; and receiving advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, including communications necessary for that purpose.

Origin

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the results of the Request for Quotation (RFQ) 6033-14-3092 for the collection, transportation and off-loading of materials from curbside collected locations in the area bounded by the Humber River to the east, Highway 427, Eglinton Avenue West and Etobicoke Creek to the west, Steeles Avenue to the north and Lake Ontario to the south, for a six (6) year period with the option to extend the contract for two (2) additional separate one (1) year periods.  This report also requests the authority to enter into a legal agreement with Miller Waste Systems Inc. being the lowest bidder meeting specifications.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 10, 2014) Report from the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and the Acting Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Award of Request for Quotation No. 6033-14-3092 for Solid Waste Curbside Collection Contract in Etobicoke Area (District 1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-70417.pdf

Speakers

Gary Smith, Chief Operating Officer, Modern Landfill Inc.

Communications (City Council)

(July 7, 2014) Letter from Gary Smith, Chief Operating Officer, Modern Corporations (CC.New.PW32.22.1)

Striking Committee - Meeting 15

ST15.1 - Council Member Appointments to committees and boards

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Will be considered following debate of Item CC54.3 on July 9

Bill 712 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint Members to the committees and boards listed below for a term of office until November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed unless noted otherwise.

 

Committees and Boards

 

 

Name of Board

 

Number of Members to be Appointed

 

Term of Office

 

Members

Planning and Growth Management Committee

 

2

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

and P. Milczyn

(Council vacancy to be declared on July 7, 2014)

 

Composition:

5 Members of Council appointed by Council plus the Chair appointed by the Committee*

 

* Council has suspended the Mayor's power to appoint Committee Chairs.  The Planning and Growth Management Committee will elect its Chair.

 

 

Until

November 30, 2014

 

P. Ainslie

J. Parker

 

Heritage Toronto

Board of Directors

 

1

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

Composition:

  • Mayor or designate appointed by the Mayor
  • 3 Members of Council

25 citizen members as follows:

  • 8 members - 2 nominated by each Community Council from the Museum Board, the Preservation Boards or Panels or interested citizen
  • 1 member nominated by the Toronto Historical Association
  • 1 member nominated by the Aboriginal community
  • 15 citizen members

 

Until

 November 30, 2014

 

M. Fragedakis

 

Toronto Civic Employees’ Pension and Benefit Fund Committee

 

 

1

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

 

Until

 November 30, 2014

 

K. Wong-Tam

 

Toronto Fire Department Superannuation and Benefit Fund Committee

 

 

1

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

 

Until

 November 30, 2014

 

K. Wong-Tam

 

Toronto French Language Advisory Committee

 

 

1

 

to replace P. Milczyn (Council vacancy to be declared on July 7, 2014) 

 

Composition:

  • 1 Member of Council, as Chair

Up to 6 representatives of Toronto's Francophone organizations appointed by the City Manager, in consultation with the Chair.

 

 

Ending

November 30, 2014

 

Incoming  Councillor for Ward 5, as Chair

 

 

Toronto Preservation Board

 

 

1

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

Composition:

  • up to 3 Members of Council
  • Chair or designate of each Community Preservation Panel
  • 7 citizens

 

Until

 November 30, 2014

 

Incoming Councillor for Ward 20

 

Toronto and East York Community Preservation Panel

 

Wards 14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32

 

1

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

Composition:

1 – 2 Members of Council

5 – 11 citizen members

 

Until

 November 30, 2014

 

Incoming Councillor for Ward 20

 

 

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority

 

1

 

to replace P. Milczyn (Council vacancy to be declared on July 7, 2014)

 

Composition:

28 members, 14 appointed by City of Toronto:

  • 9 Council Members

5 citizens

 

 

Until

November 30, 2014 and until the first meeting of the TRCA afterwards (Conservation Authorities Act)

 

R. Moeser

 

Toronto and Region Conservation Authority Etobicoke-Mimico Watersheds Coalition

 

 

1

 

to replace P. Milczyn (Council vacancy to be declared on July 7, 2014)

 

Composition:

 

Composition:

  • 1 Member from the Etobicoke York Community  Council
  • TRCA representative;
  • Regional & Local Municipalities representatives;
  • Other Public Agencies;
  • Community Group representatives;
  • Municipal Staff Liaison;
  • Municipal Environmental Advisory Committees;
  • Community Groups/ENGO’s;
  • Watershed Residents, Business Members and Academic Institution;  and

TRCA’s Community Action Area/Stewardship Groups.

 

Until

November 30, 2014

 

Incoming Councillor for Ward 5

 

 

Toronto Transit Commission

 

1

 

to replace P. Milczyn (Council vacancy to be declared on July 7, 2014)

 

Composition:

  • 7 Council members, including a Chair appointed by City Council
  • 4 citizens

 

Until

November 30, 2014

 

J. Pasternak

 

Art Gallery  of Ontario Board of Trustees

 

1

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

two persons appointed by the Council of the City of Toronto, one of whom shall also be a member of that Council (Art Gallery of Ontario Act)

 

 

Until

 November 30, 2014

 

G. Lindsay Luby

 

Harbourfront Centre Board of Directors

 

1

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

 

Until

 November 30, 2014

 

M. Layton

 

Toronto Arts Council

 

1

 

to replace A. Vaughan

 

Composition:

  • 5 Members of Council
  • Citizens

 

Until

 November 30, 2014

 

S. Carroll

 

2.         City Council appoint the incoming Councillors for Ward 5 and Ward 20 to the community-based boards listed below for a term of office until November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed.

 

 Ward 5 and Ward 20 Community Based Boards

 

Ward 5:

 

shoptheQueensway.com Business Improvement Area

The Kingsway Business Improvement Area

Village of Islington Business Improvement Area

 

Ward 20:

 

Bloor – Annex Business Improvement Area

Chinatown Business Improvement Area

Financial District Business Improvement Area

Harbord Street Business Improvement Area

Kensington Market Business Improvement Area

Korea Town Business Improvement Area

Mirvish Village Business Improvement Area

Queen Street West Business Improvement Area

The Dupont Strip (formerly called the Annex-Dupont Business Improvement Area)

The Waterfront Business Improvement Area

Toronto Entertainment District Business Improvement Area

 

58 Cecil Street Community Centre Board of Management

Harbourfront Community Centre Board

Scadding Court Community Centre Committee

University Settlement Community Centre Committee

William H. Bolton Arena Board

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

The Chair called for nominations.

 

Councillor John Parker nominated Councillor Paul Ainslie.

 

Councillor Ana Bailão nominated Councillor Jaye Robinson.

 

Councillor Doug Ford nominated Councillor Vincent Crisanti.

 

Deputy Mayor Kelly nominated Councillor John Parker.

 

The Chair called for nominations a second time.

 

The Chair called for nominations a third and final time.

 

There being no further nominations, the Chair closed the nominations.

 

There being four (4) nominations for two (2) appointments, the Striking Committee conducted a ballot for the recommended appointment of two (2) Members of Council to the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

 

The Striking Committee Administrator distributed the ballots to the Members of the Striking Committee.  Once all ballots had been cast and collected, the Administrator tallied and announced the results of the ballot for recommended appointments to the Planning and Growth Management Committee conducted on Wednesday, July 2, 2014, as follows:

 

Number of ballots cast: 5

Number of ballots required for recommended appointment: 3

Number of spoiled or illegal ballots: none

 

-           For Councillor Paul Ainslie:  3 votes

-           For Councillor Jaye Robinson:  1 vote

-           For Councillor Vincent Crisanti:  1 vote

-           For Councillor John Parker:  4 votes

-           For Councillor Ron Moeser:  1 vote

 

Councillor Paul Ainslie and Councillor John Parker were recommended for appointment, having received a majority of ballots cast.

 

No further ballots were required.

 

The summary of ballots cast is as follows:

 

For Councillor Paul Ainslie:

Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

Councillor John Parker

Councillor Karen Stintz

 

For Councillor Jaye Robinson:

Councillor Ana Bailão 

 

For Councillor Vincent Crisanti:

Councillor Doug Ford

 

For Councillor John Parker:

Councillor Ana Bailão 

Deputy Mayor Norman Kelly

Councillor John Parker

Councillor Karen Stintz

 

For Councillor Ron Moeser:

Councillor Doug Ford

Origin

(June 26, 2014) Report from City Clerk

Summary

Vacancies on City Council have resulted in a number of vacancies on committees and boards. This report provides the results of a recent canvass of Council Members for their interest in being appointed to fill these vacancies.

Background Information (Committee)

(June 26, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Council Member Appointments to committees and boards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-71029.pdf
Attachment 1 - Interested Members - Committees, agencies and external boards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-71031.pdf
Attachment 2 - Ward 5 and Ward 20 community-based boards
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-71032.pdf

Speakers

(July 2, 2014) Councillor Ron Moeser
(July 2, 2014) Councillor Pam McConnell

Communications (Committee)

(June 19, 2014) Letter from Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby - Etobicoke Centre - Ward 4 regarding Appointment to Art Gallery of Ontario - Board of Trustees (ST.Main.ST15.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/st/comm/communicationfile-48420.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Letter from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 10 York Centre regarding Vacancy on the Toronto Transit Commission (ST.New.ST15.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/st/comm/communicationfile-48451.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Letter from Councillor Jaye Robinson, Ward 25 Don Valley West regarding Striking Committee Appointments (ST.New.ST15.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/st/comm/communicationfile-48456.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28 Toronto Centre-Rosedale regarding Council Member Appointments to Committees and Boards (TTC) (ST.New.ST15.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/st/comm/communicationfile-48457.pdf

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 34

EY34.1 - Final Report - 4750 Eglinton Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
Bill 681 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 4750 Eglinton Avenue West substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 6 to the report (March 20, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to the report (March 20, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to:

 

a.         The conditions as generally listed in Attachment 7 to the report (March 20, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to final approval and the release of the Plan of Subdivision for registration;

 

b.         Any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this proposal; and

 

c.         The Draft Plan of Subdivision being amended to show Blocks 11 and 12 (public walkways) having a minimum width of 2.5 m.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(March 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

The Zoning By-law Amendment application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit the development of the land at 4750 Eglinton Avenue West with a six block, 3-storey freehold townhouse development containing 68 units.  The proposed development would have a gross floor area of approximately 13,100 m2 and have a height of 12.3 m.  A Draft Plan of Subdivision is also proposed which would create the six residential blocks and a 16.5 m wide public street connecting Eglinton Avenue West and Kipling Avenue.

 

The proposal provides an opportunity to develop this vacant site at the intersection of two arterial roads.  The proposed built form is compatible with the varying built form of the neighbourhood and the proposed public street would complement the existing local street network. 

 

As such, the proposed development is considered appropriate for the area.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law and advises the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision application.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 4750 Eglinton Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69722.pdf

Speakers

Nadia Guarino
K.R. Mullen
Anthony Barbisan
Fulvio Stepancich
Bruno Aldini
Hugh Goodwillie
Jason Pantalone, Partner, Forum Development Ltd.

Communications (Community Council)

(June 16, 2014) Letter from Deni Martin (EY.New.EY34.1.1)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Mark Cheng (EY.New.EY34.1.2)

EY34.2 - Final Report - 64 and 70 Cordova Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 1088-2002, for the lands at 64 and 70 Cordova Avenue substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District. 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.          Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for Development Phase 1, the owner shall construct or provide financial security for enhanced streetscape and landscape treatments related to the construction of the proposed pedestrian connection to Islington Avenue to a minimum value of $250,000.

 

ii.         Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for Development Phase 1, the owner shall provide a cash contribution in the amount of $150,000 towards the rehabilitation and upgrading of existing amenity space in Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) buildings at 4995 Dundas Street West and 57 Mabelle Avenue for use by TCHC tenants and approved community agencies delivering neighbourhood programming and other initiatives.

 

iii.       Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for Development Phase 2, the owner shall provide a cash contribution in the amount of $250,000 towards construction of an external entrance feature to amenity space within the Toronto Community Housing Corporation buildings at 4995 Dundas Street West and 57 Mabelle Avenue to increase the public profile and access to the space for approved community agencies delivering neighbourhood programming and other initiatives.

 

iv.        Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for Development Phase 3, the owner shall submit a cash contribution in the amount of $925,000 to be directed in consultation with the Ward Councillor as follows:

 

A.        The provision of a public art contribution in an amount no less than $350,000 in accordance with the City's Public Art Program; and

 

B.        The provision of a contribution towards the capital needs of child care facilities at the future YMCA facility to be located on the Westwood Theatre lands or as directed by Children’s Services staff; and/or

 

C.        The provision of off-site streetscape along Mabelle Avenue or Cordova Avenue, or improvements to Mabelle Park in accordance with the Etobicoke Centre Public Space and Streetscape Plan.

 

v.         The above noted cash contributions are to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made.

 

vi.        In the event the cash contributions referred to in Recommendation 3a. have not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is/are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the property.

 

b.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.          The owner shall design and construct a pedestrian connection including a staircase and accessible ramp from the Cordova Avenue right of way adjacent to the development to the Islington Avenue sidewalk in accordance with the following:

 

A.        Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for Development Phase 1, the owner shall submit a financial security to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to cover the costs of implementing the proposed staircase, including the relocation of municipal infrastructure, and any engineering review or inspection fees;

 

B.        The owner shall construct the pedestrian connection coincidently with Development Phase 1 being constructed and ensure that the existing pedestrian staircase from the site is open and accessible during construction and not decommissioned until such time as the new staircase is constructed and operational;

 

C.        The owner shall provide drawings for the relocation of the existing watermain and any other civil works required to construct the proposed pedestrian connection to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services for review and approval;

 

D.        The owner shall be responsible for obtaining all required approvals from the Ministry of the Environment for watermain relocation and any other civil works required to construct the proposed pedestrian connection;

 

E.         The owner shall provide structural drawings and shoring drawings of the proposed pedestrian connection stamped by two Professional Engineers to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

F.         The owner shall excavate in the vicinity of the Cordova Avenue bridge in accordance with the City’s “Risk Management Requirements for Proposed Excavation adjacent to Gardiner Structures or City Bridges/Structures”; and

 

G.        The owner shall be required to certify that the retaining walls, stairs and ramps associated with the proposed pedestrian connection will be designed and constructed in accordance with the Geotechnical Investigation prepared by EXP Services Inc., dated April 19, 2013.

 

ii.         Prior to issuance of an above grade building permit for Development Phase 3, the owner shall convey a public access easement over the open space adjacent to Cordova Avenue to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor to facilitate access over the lands to the pedestrian connection to Islington Avenue.

 

iii.       The owner shall be required to certify that the recommendations of the Noise and Vibration Study prepared by HGC Engineering, dated September 4, 2012 have been implemented including:

 

A.        The provision of central air conditioning for all dwelling units in the buildings;

 

B.        The Sound Transmission Class (STC) requirements for glazing elements providing sufficient acoustical insulation of the indoor spaces;

 

C.        Exterior wall assemblies being verified to ensure noise transmitted through is negligible;

 

D.        Warning clauses are included in the property and tenancy agreements and offers of purchase and sale to inform future residents of traffic noise issues, the Canadian Pacific Railway right of way and the proximity of TTC operations at Islington subway station; and

 

E.         The inclusion of isolation measures against the south foundation wall for Development Phase 1 to mitigate vibration levels from train pass-bys.

 

iv.        The owner shall make arrangements to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services to convey to the City a 5.0-metre by 5.0-metre property triangle at the northeast corner of the subject site, and any required strips of land along the Mabelle Avenue and Cordova Avenue frontages of the site to accommodate the existing or redesigned Mabelle Avenue and Cordova Avenue sidewalks and connections to the pedestrian connection.

 

v.         The owner shall design and construct the following transportation facilities to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services:

 

A.        An extension to the existing left-turn storage lane at the west Mabelle Avenue approach (eastbound) to the Mabelle Avenue/Cordova Avenue unsignalised intersection to 40 metres in length, with a 15-metre taper;

 

B.        A 20-metre left-turn storage lane, with a 15-metre taper, at the south Cordova Avenue approach (northbound) to the Mabelle Avenue/Cordova Avenue unsignalised intersection; and

 

C.        A two way centre left turn lane on Mabelle Avenue, extending from Cordova Avenue to the west property limit of the subject site. The two way centre left turn lane to be formalized by means of a by-law.

 

vi.        The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for 64-70 Cordova Avenue to permit the construction of three residential apartment buildings of 45, 38 and 35 storeys in height above a two to three storey mixed use base building containing grade-related residential and retail uses.  The proposal includes 1,200 residential units and 711 m2 of retail space.  As part of this application, a pedestrian staircase and ramp located immediately adjacent and connecting the site to Islington Avenue is proposed as a major public realm improvement that would improve pedestrian circulation to and from Islington subway station for the Mabelle neighbourhood to the north and west of the subject site.

 

The proposal represents an appropriate intensification of an underutilized site within the Etobicoke Centre Secondary Plan area in close proximity to the Islington subway station.  The development fits within the existing context of tall buildings and conforms to the City's Tall Building Design Guidelines.  It provides an appropriate mix of uses for the site and reinforces the public realm through the provision of increased building setbacks along with grade related uses.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 64 and 70 Cordova Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69985.pdf

Speakers

Charles McLeod
Mary Buie

Communications (Community Council)

(June 9, 2014) Letter from Ernest J.L. Meershoek (EY.New.EY34.2.1)
(June 9, 2014) Letter from Milan Supak (EY.New.EY34.2.2)
(June 8, 2014) Letter from Chen Lu (EY.New.EY34.2.3)

EY34.3 - Final Report - 26 and 30 Fieldway Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 702 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 26 and 30 Fieldway Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with Attachment 5 amended by replacing Schedule 'B' of the by-law with the Schedule 'B' attached to the motion moved by Councillor Peter Leon at  the June 17, 2014 meeting of the Etobicoke York Community Council, which has the effect of amending the maximum building heights as follows:

 

a.         Blocks A and B from 12.6 metres to 13.0 metres; and

 

b.         The south end of Blocks C, D, E and F from 13.2 metres to 13.5 metres.

  

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:

           

a.         Revise and resubmit a Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

b.         Enter into a financially secured Development Agreement for the construction of any improvements to existing municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to the infrastructure to support this development.

 

c.         Enter into a Site Plan Agreement pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, such agreement to secure the recommended mitigation measures and warning clauses of the Noise and Vibration Feasibility Study, dated July 5, 2013.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit a 148-unit residential townhouse development at 26 and 30 Fieldway Road.  The development is proposed to include six 4-storey townhouse blocks on a 153 space single level underground parking garage. 

 

The proposed development is appropriate for the site and compatible with the surrounding area.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 26 and 30 Fieldway Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69978.pdf
Attachment to Motion moved by Councillor Peter Leon at the meeting of Etobicoke York Community Council on June 17, 2014 - Schedule 'B' By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-70790.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 2, 2014) Letter from Dennis De Rango, Specialized Services Team Lead, Hydro One (EY.New.EY34.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47903.pdf

EY34.4 - Final Report - 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (June 2, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with Clause X.iii contained therein amended to read as follows:

 

X. iii.   The maximum density within Mixed Use Area 'A' and Mixed Use area 'B' shall be 3.2 times the gross lot area.  The gross lot area of the site is 11,246 square meters.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 1994-197 for the lands at 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the motion moved by Councillor Mark Grimes at the June 17, 2014 meeting of the Etobicoke York Community Council.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and the City Solicitor, such Agreement to be registered on title to secure the following facilities, services and matters from the owner at its expense:

 

a.         A cash contribution of $500,000 to be paid to the City prior to the issuance of the first above-grade permit, towards parks and local improvements in the Humber Bay Shores area, as determined by the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, including but not limited to the design and construction of the future public park on the adjacent property at 2175 Lake Shore Boulevard West.

 

b.         Require that any cash amount identified in A. above to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment.

 

c.         In the event the cash contribution referred to in a. above has not been used for the intended purpose within three years of the By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and the TRCA, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the property.

 

d.         The following is also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement, as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.          The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with the Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009.

 

ii          The owner to provide for appropriate public access to the private open space between Building "C" and Street "C" to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to:

 

a.         Revise the loading spaces to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

b.         Submit results of hydrant flow tests that indicate the existing watermain system can support the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

c.         Provide acceptable wind mitigation measures for the park at 2175 Lake Shore Boulevard West to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

d.         Complete the requirements and related approvals process of the City's Tree By-laws to the satisfaction of Manager, Tree Protection and Plan Review, Urban Forestry.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Site Specific Zoning By-law 1994-197 for the lands at 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West to permit a 2-storey commercial building fronting Lake Shore Boulevard West, a 6-storey residential building on the central block of the development site, and a 41-storey residential tower with ground-floor retail uses fronting Marine Parade Drive.  A total of 540 units are proposed with 568 parking spaces in three levels of underground parking.  A publicly accessible private open space area between the proposed commercial building and the 6-storey residential building is proposed.  The proposal would provide a new future public road (Street "C") in the centre of the site and a new laneway at the rear of the commercial building; both of which would connect with road alignments on adjacent sites.

 

The proposal and its implementing site-specific amendments to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law are consistent with the 2014 Provincial Policy Statement and conform to the Provincial Growth Plan.

 

The proposed development conforms to the general intent and principles of the Humber Bay Shores Urban Design Guidelines Update and Public Realm Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-70037.pdf
Attachment 1 to Motion moved by Councillor Mark Grimes at the meeting of Etobicoke York Community Council on June 17, 2014 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-70771.pdf

Speakers

Peter Swinton, PMG Planning

Communications (Community Council)

(June 17, 2014) Letter from Cyndi Rottenberg-Walker, Partner, Urban Strategies Inc. (EY.New.EY34.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48187.pdf

4a - Supplementary Report - 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Origin
(June 13, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

The subject application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Site Specific Zoning By-law 1994-197 for the lands at 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West to permit a 2-storey commercial building fronting Lake Shore Boulevard West, a 6-storey residential building on the central block of the development site, and a 41-storey residential tower with ground-floor retail uses fronting Marine Parade Drive.  A total of 540 units are proposed with 568 parking spaces in three levels of underground parking. 

 

This report recommends a quantum for the Section 37 contribution and directs that the Section 37 funds be allocated to local park improvements, including but not limited to the future public park at 2175 Lake Shore Boulevard West.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 13, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Supplementary Report - 2169-2173 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-70586.pdf

EY34.5 - Final Report - 2 Station Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 2 Station Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Prior to introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands to:

 

a.         Revise and submit the Functional Servicing Report to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services for review and acceptance to determine whether the municipal water, sanitary and storm sewer systems can support the proposed redevelopment and whether upgrades or improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure are required.

 

b.         Enter into a financially secured development agreement for construction of any improvements to the municipal infrastructure, should it be determined that upgrades are required to support this development, according to the revised Functional Servicing Report accepted by the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

4.         Prior to introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into one or more Agreements pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure, at the owner's sole expense:

 

a.         A Heritage Easement Agreement to be entered into between the owner and the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

b.         The following is also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.          The owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with the Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009.

 

5.         City Council require that the following matters be provided prior to the issuance of Final Site Plan Approval for all or any portion of the site under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act:

 

a.         A detailed Conservation Plan substantially in accordance with the conservation work described in the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by Martindale Planning Services, dated February 2014, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         An Interpretation Plan that interprets the cultural heritage values of the heritage property on the site, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c.         A Lighting Plan for the sensitive illumination of the heritage property on the site to enhance the building's heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

6.         City Council direct that if, for whatever reason, the development at 2 Station Road does not proceed within 5 years from the passage of the Bills by City Council, the site specific Zoning By-law Amendment shall be null and void and new plans and drawings for the development of the site must be submitted to the City of Toronto for approval.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

 

Etobicoke York Community Council considered the following Items together:

 

-           EY34.5, headed "Final Report - 2 Station Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application"; and

 

-           EY34.6, headed "Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2 Station Road".

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes additions to, and the internal conversion of, the existing Wesley Mimico United Church at 2 Station Road to facilitate the redevelopment of this site to a multi-use facility that includes a new worship area, community uses and 30 seniors' apartments.

 

The application represents an adaptive reuse of a heritage building and would provide for seniors' apartments for the neighbourhood at a scale that is appropriate for the area.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 2 Station Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69988.pdf

Speakers

Mary Louise Ashbourne, Chair, Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel
Peter Shepherd
Harry Oussoren
Robert Reimers, Robert Reimers Architect
Deirdre Gibson, Robert Reimers Architect
Martin E. Gerwin, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Network
Judith A. Rutledge, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Network
Denise Harris, Etobicoke Historical Society
Alex Hardie

Communications (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Petition from Peter Shepherd containing the signatures of approximately 128 residents (EY.Main.EY34.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47844.pdf
(May 26, 2014) Letter from Elisabeth Korda (EY.Main.EY34.5.2)
(May 28, 2014) Letter from Michael, F. Korda, Korda Investments Inc. (EY.Main.EY34.5.3)
(May 23, 2014) Letter from Betty Anne Clark (EY.Main.EY34.5.4)
(June 13, 2014) Letter from Martin E. Gerwin and Judith A. Rutledge, Co-Chairs, Steering Group, Mimico Lakeshore Network (EY.New.EY34.5.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-48078.pdf
(June 15, 2014) E-mail from Angela Barnes and Julie Turcsanyi (EY.New.EY34.5.6)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from John Cary, President, Mimico Residents Association (EY.New.EY34.5.7)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Luke Hutton (EY.New.EY34.5.8)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Jaan Pill (EY.New.EY34.5.9)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Abbe Edelson (EY.New.EY34.5.10)

EY34.6 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2 Station Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 2 Station Road, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a multi-use facility that includes a new worship area, community uses and 30 seniors' apartments provided the existing church building is retained in situ, conserved and is subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City, with such alterations to the property at 2 Station Road to be substantially in accordance with the plans and drawings prepared by Robert Reimers Architect Ltd. dated February 19, 2014 and the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by Martindale Planning Services dated February 2014, both on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a.         The related Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         Prior to the introduction of the bills for such Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall have:

 

i.          Entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 2 Station Road in accordance with the above referenced Heritage Impact Assessment and subject to and in accordance with the herein required Conservation Plan, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

ii.         Provided such Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the property located at 2 Station Road dated February 2014, and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iii.       Completed and registered a Section 37 Agreement (pursuant to the Planning Act) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services

 

c.         Prior to Final Site Plan approval for the property at 2 Station Road:

 

i.          The owner shall complete all heritage-related pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         The owner shall provide Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iii.       The related Zoning By-law giving rise to the proposed alterations shall be in full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

d.         Prior to the issuance of any permit for the property at 2 Station Road, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building the owner shall:

 

i.          Obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendment required for the alterations to the property at 2 Station Road, such amendment to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         Have obtained Final Site Plan approval for such property, issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

           

iii.       Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iv.        Provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the Wesley Mimico United Church will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

v.         Provide an Interpretation Plan for 2 Station Road, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

vi.        Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and the approved Interpretation Plan.

 

e.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the owner shall:

 

i.          Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 2 Station Road in a form and content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and City Solicitor.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 2 Station Road.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council considered the following Items together:

 

-           EY34.5, headed "Final Report - 2 Station Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application"; and

 

-           EY34.6, headed "Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2 Station Road".

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The property at 2 Station Road (Wesley Mimico United Church) is subject to an Intention to Designate under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, adopted by City Council on December 16, 2013.

 

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations to the designated property in conjunction with an application to amend the existing Zoning By-law to facilitate the redevelopment of this site to a multi-use facility that includes a new worship area, community uses and 30 seniors' apartments. Substantial portions of the church exterior are proposed to be retained with additions to the front, rear and top of the building and alterations to the windows, doors and roof.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division regarding Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2 Station Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69972.pdf

Speakers

Mary Louise Ashbourne, Chair, Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel
Peter Shepherd
Harry Oussoren
Robert Reimers, Robert Reimers Architect
Dierdre Gibson, Robert Reimers Architect
Martin E. Gerwin, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Network
Judith A. Rutledge, Co-Chair, Mimico Lakeshore Network
Denise Harris, Etobicoke Historical Society
Alex Hardy

6a - Toronto Preservation Board Recommendations - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 2 Station Road

Origin
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 5, 2014, considered the following:

 

1.         (May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property – 2 Station Road.

 

2.         Communications:

 

(May 29, 2014) E-mail from Bob and Charlotte Sharkey (PB.Supp.PB32.3.1)

(May 30, 2014) E-mail from Michael Harrison (PB.Supp.PB32.3.2)

(May 31, 2014) E-mail from Michael Colvin and Mary Bella (PB.Supp.PB32.3.3)

(June 2, 2014) E-mail from Dave Vellekoop (PB.Supp.PB32.3.4)

(June 3, 2014) E-mail from Neil James (PB.Supp.PB32.3.5)

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

Harry Oussoren

Robert Reimers

Ruth Grier, Mimico Lakeshore Network

Chris Drew

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board regarding 2 Station Road - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-70324.pdf

EY34.25 - Traffic Control Signals - Keele Street at Gracefield Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
12 - York South-Weston

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Keele Street and Gracefield Avenue.

Origin

(March 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council does not have delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Keele Street, City Council approval of this report is required.  TTC staff has not been advised of the signal installation studies. 

 

The installation of traffic control signals at this location cannot be supported by staff as the Technical justification is not met.

Background Information (Community Council)

(March 17, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding Traffic Control Signals: Keele Street at Gracefield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69555.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69556.pdf

Speakers

Eric Angelini

Communications (Community Council)

(May 12, 2014) E-mail from Teresa Orofiamma (EY.Main.EY34.25.1)
(June 4, 2014) Letter from Teresa and Sandro Orofiamma (EY.New.EY34.25.2)
(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Teresa Orofiamma (EY.New.EY34.25.3)

EY34.34 - Payment-In-Lieu of Parking - 3008 Bloor Street West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve exempting the applicant at 3008 Bloor Street West from By-law 941-2003 parking requirement of one parking stall, subject to a $2,500.00 payment-in-lieu of parking and that the applicant signs a Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Agreement with the City, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Origin

(May 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This staff  report seeks Council's approval to exempt the applicant from the parking requirement specified in By-law 941-2003 (Bloor Street West Avenues by-law) to provide one additional parking stall. Instead of accommodating the parking on-site, the applicant has requested a payment-in-lieu of parking in the amount of $2,500.00 to the City.

 

The parking exemption is considered appropriate since the one-stall shortfall will not have a significant impact on parking conditions in the area.

 

Section 40 of the Planning Act grants Council the authority to approve payment-in-lieu of parking. This application has been made pursuant to the City’s Payment-In-Lieu of Parking Policy adopted in July 2004. City Council approval is required as this matter has not been delegated.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District - Payment-In-Lieu of Parking - 3008 Bloor Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69716.pdf
Attachment 1 - Context Map; Attachment 2 - Applicant’s Site Plan; Attachment 3 - Applicant’s Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69717.pdf

EY34.37 - Parking Regulation Amendment - Oakwood Avenue from Regal Road to Highview Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport
Attention
Bill 659 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve rescinding the "No Parking" regulation from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. except weekends and public holidays, on the west side of Oakwood Avenue, between Regal Road and Highview Crescent.

 

2.         City Council approve the enactment of a “No Parking” regulation from 8:00 a.m. to 12 noon, every 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month, on the west side of Oakwood Avenue, between Regal Road and Highview Crescent.

Origin

(May 13, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to amend the parking regulations on Oakwood Avenue, between Regal Road and Highview Crescent in order to facilitate mechanical street sweeping operation.

 

The prohibition of "No Parking" regulation from 8:00 a.m. to 12 noon, on the 2nd and 4th Wednesday of each month on the west side of Oakwood Avenue, between Regal Road and Highview Crescent will facilitate the convenience of mechanical street cleaning operation.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates transit service on this stretch of Oakwood Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 13, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District, regarding a Parking Regulation Amendment - Oakwood Avenue from Regal Road to Highview Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69600.pdf
Attachment 1 - Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-69601.pdf

EY34.45 - Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Communication EY34.45.3 has been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to the following requests, noting that the applicant is required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

 

1.         An extension of hours for liquor licensing purposes at the following establishments, from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. during the 5th annual Toronto Beer Week Festival, to be held from September 12 to 20, 2014:

 

- 1793777 Ontario Ltd., 3030 Dundas Street West; and

- Taste of Portuguese Cuisine, 2888 Lakeshore Boulevard West.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council, under its delegated authority, declared for liquor licensing purposes, the following events to be of municipal significance, and directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised that the Community Council has no objection to them taking place:

 

1.         The 5th annual Toronto Beer Week Festival, to be held from September 12 to 20, 2014 at various venues across the City, including the following:

 

- 1793777 Ontario Ltd., 3030 Dundas Street West; and

- Taste of Portuguese Cuisine, 2888 Lakeshore Boulevard West.

 

2.         The Shorefront Festival hosted by the Lakeshore Village Business Improvement Area in South Etobicoke, to be held on Lake Shore Boulevard West, from First Street to Twelfth Street, on September 6, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of various events for liquor licensing purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(May 12, 2014) Letter from George Milbrandt, Chair, Toronto Beer Week, regarding the 5th Annual Toronto Beer Week Festival from September 12-20, 2014. (EY.Main.EY34.45.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47673.pdf
(May 21, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore, regarding the Shorefront Festival on September 6, 2014. (EY.Main.EY34.45.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/comm/communicationfile-47674.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(June 27, 2014) E-mail from Wendy Ellington, Da House of Jerk, requesting a temporary extension to the licensed area at Da House of Jerk, 680 Rexdale Boulevard, Unit 19-20, on Sunday, July 27, 2014, from 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., for its Customer Appreciation Day (CC.Main.EY34.45.3)

EY34.47 - St. Clair Gardens Business Improvement Area - Proactive Enforcement Measures

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request Toronto Police Services 11 and 12 Division to proactively inspect the following locations, and to patrol the area more often, given the level of complaints regarding drug trafficking, loud noise, and illegal activities:

 

- 1675, 1708, 1776, 1828 (basement unit) St. Clair Avenue West

- 360 Old Weston Road.

 

2.         City Council request the Alcohol and Gaming Commission (AGCO) to proactively inspect the above-noted locations and take whatever action is deemed necessary.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council requested Municipal Licensing and Standards, and Toronto Fire Services to proactively inspect the following locations, and report to the Etobicoke York Community Council by the fall of 2014 on their findings:

 

-           1675, 1708, 1776, 1828 (basement unit) St. Clair Avenue West

-           360 Old Weston Road.

Origin

(June 9, 2014) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio, Ward 17 - Davenport

Summary

St. Clair Ave West, between McRoberts Avenue and Old Weston Road, is a commercial strip that is struggling to survive. This community is fortunate to have attracted businesses that serve the diverse needs of the area, including restaurants, salons, boutiques, cafes, and medical offices. In order to establish a safer and healthier neighbourhood, it is important that the uses and activities along this commercial strip live in harmony with residents in the surrounding area.

 

Unfortunately, the bar culture on St. Clair Avenue West is a serious concern, as it has evolved to become an ongoing issue that is deflating this area’s sense of community and safety. Drug dealing, intimidating behaviour, public drunkenness, and excessive loud noise have all compromised the local residents’ quality of life.

 

On behalf of local residents, the St. Clair Gardens BIA, and the Police Community Partnership Committee for 11/12 Division (PCP11/12), we are respectfully requesting that proactive measures be taken by Municipal Licensing & Standards, in partnership with Toronto Police Services of 11 and 12 Division, the Alcohol and Gaming Commission (AGCO), and Toronto Fire Services at the following problematic locations on St. Clair Ave West: 1675, 1708, 1776, 1828 (basement unit), and 360 Old Weston Road.  These problem addresses are well known by Toronto Police Services, the AGCO, Toronto Fire Services and Municipal Licensing and Standards, given the lengthy history of ongoing illegal activities at these locations.

 

I cannot stress how important it is that we have police patrol this area at night. As you know, the bars along this strip are problematic locations that have become regular scenes of illegal activities. We need to take a proactive approach that includes regular police presence in the area to avert such activities and to establish a safer environment for the local residents.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 9, 2014) Letter from Councillor Cesar Palacio, Ward 17 - Davenport requesting proactive enforcement measures be taken in the St. Clair Gardens Business Improvement Area
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-70663.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 33

NY33.8 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2384 Yonge Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 2384 Yonge Street (Postal Station K) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

2.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

5.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owners of the property 2384 Yonge Street.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(August 21, 2013) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 2384 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value and grant authority for a heritage easement agreement.  Located on the west side of Yonge Street between Helendale and Montgomery Avenues in North Toronto, the site contains Postal Station K, which was listed on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties in 1974.  A development proposal integrates the post office building into a residential development in its entirety and the new owners have agreed to the designation of the property under the Ontario Heritage Act and to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 21, 2013) Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2384 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69697.pdf

8a - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2384 Yonge Street

Origin
(September 5, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on September 4, 2013, considered the following:

 

1.         Report (August 21, 2013) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement – 2384 Yonge Street.

 

2.         Communication (September 3, 2013) E-mail from Jack Winberg, The Rockport Group.

Background Information (Community Council)
(September 5, 2013) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 2384 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69698.pdf
Attachment to the Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Letter (September 3, 2013) from Jack Winberg, The Rockport Group
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69699.pdf
Attachment to the Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Agenda Item History - NY21.59 - To Clarify Council's Commitment to Designate a Portion of Station "K" (2384 Yonge Street) as a Heritage Property and Facilitate Securing the Designation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69700.pdf

NY33.9 - Inclusion on City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 1133-1377 Sheppard Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - York Centre

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council  recommends that:

 

1.         City Council include the following 10 buildings or building complexes on the property at 1133-1377 Sheppard Avenue West (Parc Downsview Park) on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties:

 

a.         Buildings 34, 35 and 36 (Plant Complex 3);

 

b.         Buildings 38 and 39 (Construction and Engineering Building);

 

c.         Building 40 (Storage Building and Workshop);

 

d.         Building 41 (Storage Building);

 

e.         Building 42 (Storage Building);

 

f.          Building 43 (Workshop);

 

g.         Building 100 (Administration Building);

 

h.         Building 103 (Fire Hall);

 

i.          Building 105 (Central Heating Plant No. 1); and

 

j.          Building 151 (Supply Depot).

Origin

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council include the 10 buildings or building complexes at 1133-1377 Sheppard Avenue West (Parc Downsview Park) that are listed in Recommendation No. 1 below on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties .  The buildings and building complexes are identified by the names and building numbers assigned to the site when it was under the jurisdiction of the Department of National Defence as a military base.

 

The properties in Recommendation No. 1 are identified in the Downsview Area Secondary Plan, and their inclusion on the City's heritage inventory would support the heritage policies in Section 3.4 of the Secondary Plan that encourage the conservation of buildings and landscapes with heritage significance.  The proposed listing of additional structures on the heritage inventory will enable Council to protect all of the heritage attributes and values of the site while allowing the property owner to move forward with their future planning objectives.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 16, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-5 (including 2A-J and 3A-J) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding the Inclusion on City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties at 1133-1377 Sheppard Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69715.pdf

Speakers

Geoff Kettel, Chair, North York Community Preservation Panel

Communications (Community Council)

(June 9, 2014) E-mail from Geoff kettel, Chair, North York Communtiy Preservation Panel (NY.New.NY33.9.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-48216.pdf

9a - Inclusion on City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 1133-1377 Sheppard Avenue West

Origin
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 5, 2014, considered the following:

 

1.         (May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, Inclusion on City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties – 1133-1377 Sheppard Avenue West

2.         (June 3, 2014) Letter from Rodger Martin, Acting General Manager, Real Estate Ontario and Atlantic, Canada Lands Company (PB.Supp.PB32.5.1)

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board on Inclusion on City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties - 1133-1377 Sheppard Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70661.pdf
Attachment - Letter from Rodger Martin, Acting General Manager, Real Estate Ontario and Atlantic, Canada Lands Company
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70662.pdf

NY33.11 - Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition - Keele Street at St. Regis Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West
Attention
Bill 656 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

 North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the removal of the westbound right-turn-on-red prohibition at anytime at the intersection of St. Regis Crescent and Keele Street.

 

2.         City Council approve the installation of the westbound right-turn-on-red prohibition from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at the intersection of St. Regis Crescent and Keele Street.

Origin

(May 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service both on Keele Street and St. Regis Crescent, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to amend the existing westbound right-turn-on-red prohibition at anytime to a westbound right-turn-on-red prohibition from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at the intersection of St. Regis Crescent and Keele Street.

 

The proposed amendment to the existing westbound right-turn-on-red prohibition will reduce the vehicle delay for westbound right turning traffic at this intersection, without unduly impacting the pedestrian traffic.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, regarding a Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition at Keele Street at St. Regis Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69961.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Right-Turn-on-Red Prohibition - Keele Street at St. Regis Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69962.pdf

NY33.19 - Construction Staging Area - Yorkdale Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bill 670 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the closure of the west side sidewalk and southbound curb lane on Yorkdale Road, between William R. (W.R.) Allen Road off-ramp intersection and Highway 401 on-ramp-Yorkdale access, from April l, 2014 to August 1, 2016.

 

2.         City Council approve the deletion of the existing westbound left turn prohibition at the intersection of Yorkdale Road and Highway 401 on-ramp-Yorkdale Mall access, from May 1, 2014 to August 1, 2016.

 

3.         City Council direct that Yorkdale Road be returned to its pre-construction traffic and left turn regulations when the project is complete.

Origin

(May 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Yorkdale Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval for the temporary lane closure of the south curb lane and sidewalk on the west side of Yorkdale Road fronting Yorkdale Mall and to rescind the existing westbound left turn prohibition at the intersection of Yorkdale Road/Access to Highway 401 East and Westbound/Yorkdale Mall Entrance to allow for alternate routing and to provide a secondary access to Yorkdale Mall during the mall expansion and lane closure. 

 

The Yorkdale Mall East expansion will consist of building a three level department store along with five levels of parking below the retail store.  This commercial facility will require an excavation depth from the street level of approximately 13 metres.  The building will be fully enclosed. This project requires one southbound lane closure and the closure of the west side sidewalk for a period of 28 months to enable construction to proceed.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 15, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, regarding a Construction Staging Area on Yorkdale Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69970.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Yorkdale Road Construction Staging Area - South side walk and curb lane Closure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69971.pdf

NY33.22 - Turn Restrictions (Bicycles Excepted) - Oakwood Avenue at Gloucester Grove, Clovelly Avenue, Bude Street and Hanson Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bill 671 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the existing by-law deleting the prohibited northbound right turn restriction from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue and Bude Street.

 

2.         City Council amend the existing by-law by deleting the prohibited northbound right turn restriction from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue and Clovelly Avenue.

 

3.         City Council amend the existing by-law by deleting the prohibited northbound right turn restriction from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue and Gloucester Grove.

 

4.         City Council amend the existing by-law by deleting the prohibited southbound right turn restriction from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue and Hanson Road.

 

5.         City Council amend the existing by-law to prohibit northbound right turn restriction from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue and Bude Street, bicycles excepted.

 

6.         City Council amend the existing by-law to prohibit northbound right turn restriction from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue and Clovelly Avenue, bicycles excepted.

 

7.         City Council amend the existing by-law to prohibit northbound right turn restriction from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Saturday at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue and Gloucester Grove, bicycles excepted.

 

8.         City Council amend the existing by-law to prohibit southbound right turn restriction from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue and Hanson Road, bicycles excepted.

Origin

(May 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Oakwood Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval allowing bicycles to proceed during restricted times when northbound right turn restrictions are in place at the intersection of Oakwood Avenue at Gloucester Grove, Clovelly Avenue, Bude Street and also for the southbound right turn restrictions at Oakwood Avenue and Hanson Road.

 

The implementation of Bicycles Excepted at the existing northbound and southbound right turn restrictions at the above noted intersections will permit right turn movements for bicycles, as requested, without unduly impacting the operation of the intersection.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, regarding Turn Restrictions (Bicycles Excepted) on Oakwood Avenue at Gloucester Grove, at Clovelly Avenue, at Bude Street and at Hanson Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70055.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Oakwood Avenue at Gloucester Grove, Clovelly Avenue, Bude Street and Hanson Road - Northbound and Southbound Right Turn Restrictions (Bicycles Excepted)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70056.pdf

NY33.24 - Parking Prohibitions - Bayview Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
Bill 658 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of No Parking Anytime on the west side of Bayview Avenue between Sheppard Avenue East and Finch Avenue East.

Origin

(May 13, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bayview Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to install No Parking Anytime on the west side of Bayview Avenue between Sheppard Avenue East and Finch Avenue East.

 

The parking prohibition will address the issue of daily on-street parking activity on this major arterial roadway which is currently disrupting the flow of traffic, particularly for TTC Buses.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 13, 2014) Report from Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District on Parking Prohibitions on Bayview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69996.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Parking Prohibition - Bayview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69997.pdf

NY33.28 - Through Restrictions (Bicycles Excepted) - Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
Bill 669 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the existing by-law to delete northbound through, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday prohibition at the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue.

 

2.         City Council amend the existing by-law to delete southbound through, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday prohibition at the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue.

 

3.         City Council amend the existing by-law to delete eastbound right turn, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, buses excepted prohibition at the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue.

 

4.         City Council amend the existing by-law to install northbound through, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, bicycles-excepted prohibition at the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue.

 

5.         City Council amend the existing by-law to install southbound through, 4:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, bicycles-excepted prohibition at the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue.

 

6.         City Council amend the existing by-law to install eastbound right turn, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday, buses and bicycles-excepted prohibition at the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue.

Origin

(April 12, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Steeles Avenue West, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to allow bicycles to proceed during the times that northbound, southbound and eastbound through restrictions are in place at the intersection of Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue.

 

The implementation of bicycles excepted at the existing northbound and southbound through restrictions on Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue will permit through movements for bicycles.

Background Information (Community Council)

(April 12, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District, on Through Restrictions (Bicycles Excepted) at Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69966.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map -Steeles Avenue West and Hilda Avenue - Northbound and Southbound Through Restrictions (Bicycles Excepted)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69967.pdf

NY33.34 - Stop Control - St. Dennis Drive Ramp to Eglinton Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
26 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 654 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the removal of the existing yield control on St. Dennis Drive at the ramp to Eglinton Avenue East.

 

2.         City Council approve the installation of a stop control for northbound vehicles on St. Dennis Drive at the ramp to Eglinton Avenue East.

Origin

(May 12, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on both St. Dennis Drive/Wynford Drive and Eglinton Avenue East, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to require northbound vehicles on the ramp from St. Dennis Drive to stop at the ramp to Eglinton Avenue East from Wynford Drive.

 

The installation of a stop control for northbound vehicles on St. Dennis Drive at the ramp to Eglinton Avenue East will address the right-of-way concerns at the intersection.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 12, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, regarding a Stop Control at St. Dennis Drive Ramp to Eglinton Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69862.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - St. Dennis Drive ramp to Eglinton Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69863.pdf

NY33.35 - Installation of Traffic Control Signals and Stop Control - Helen Lu Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
33 - Don Valley East
Attention
Bill 668 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the deletion of the through highway on Forest Manor Road between the west side of Parkway Forest Drive and the north side of Parkway Forest Drive.

 

2.         City Council approve the installation of the through highway on Forest Manor Road between Parkway Forest Drive and Helen Lu Road.

 

3.         City Council approve the installation of northbound compulsory stop at Helen Lu Road on Forest Manor Road.

 

4.         City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Don Mills Road and Helen Lu Road.

Origin

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Don Mills Road, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Don Mills Road and Helen Lu Road and a stop control at the south approach at the intersection of Helen Lu Road and Forest Manor Road.

 

The installation of the traffic control signals and a stop control will satisfy the conditions of the Plan of Subdivision application for the creation of a new public road connecting Forest Manor Road to Don Mills Road. The proposed traffic control signals and a stop control will provide a safe environment for both the existing and future vehicle and pedestrian traffic which will be generated by development in the area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District on Installation of Traffic Control Signals and Stop Control at Helen Lu Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70057.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Traffic Control Signals and Stop Control - Helen Lu Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70058.pdf

NY33.37 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1-57 William Poole Way

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
Bill 650 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, Fire Routes, to amend the address range of the private roadway located at the property currently listed in Schedule A, Fire Route Designations to Chapter 880, Fire Routes as:

 

a.         1-57 William Poole Way

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to amend the existing designated Fire Route.

 

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to amend the designation of a certain portion of the property municipally known as 1-57 William Poole Way as a fire route within the meaning of Chapter 880, Fire Routes. The fire route in question was originally designated for a townhouse complex with the address range 17-30 William Poole Way. The complex now contains homes with the complete address range of 1-57 William Poole Way.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, regarding the Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 Fire Routes at 1-57 William Poole Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69707.pdf
Attachment - Draft By-law regarding the Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 Fire Routes at 1-57 William Poole Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69708.pdf

NY33.38 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 131-141 Finch Avenue East; 100 Harrison Garden Blvd; 1340 Leslie Street; 85 The Donway West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
23 - Willowdale, 24 - Willowdale
Attention
Bill 649 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part of those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes:

 

a.         131-141 Finch Avenue East

b.         100 Harrison Garden Blvd

c.         1340 Leslie Street

d.         85 The Donway West

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(May 23, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager,Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, regarding the Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes at 131-141 Finch Avenue East; 100 Harrison Garden Blvd; 1340 Leslie Street; 85 The Donway West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69703.pdf
Attachment - Draft By-law regarding the Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes at 131-141 Finch Avenue East; 100 Harrison Garden Blvd; 1340 Leslie Street; 85 The Donway West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69704.pdf

NY33.39 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1090 Don Mills Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 651 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes:

 

a.         1090 Don Mills Road

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services, regarding the Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes at 1090 Don Mills Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69705.pdf
Attachment - Draft By-law regarding the Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes at 1090 Don Mills Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69706.pdf

NY33.42 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
9 - York Centre, 23 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following request, noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable by-laws and obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

 

a.         A temporary liquor licence extension from the Japanese Canadian Cultural Centre, for the proposed enclosed outdoor courtyard area attached to the cultural centre in order to run a "Beer Garden" as part of their annual Summer Festival on July 12, 2014, from 3:00 p.m. to 11:30 p.m., at the Kobayashi Garden Court, 6 Garamond Court.

 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council, under its delegated authority:

 

1.         For liquor licensing purposes, declared the following to be events of municipal significance, and directed that the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised that the Community Council has no objection to their taking place:

 

a.         13th Annual " Korean Harvest Festival" also known as the "Harvest Moon Festival", to be held on Saturday, September 6, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Sunday, September 7, 2014, from 1:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. at Mel Lastman Square

 

b.         Fresh City Farms Open Farm Event and Beer Garden, to be held in both the greenhouse and the outside farm/picinic area, on Sunday, June 22, 2014, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., at 70 Canuck Avenue, Downsview Park

 

2.         Re-opened Item NY32.23 (North York Community Council - May 13, 2014) only insofar as it relates to the "Festival of Festivals:  A Celebration of Greece" event.

 

3.         Rescinded its previous decision on North York Community Council Item NY32.23, regarding the "Festival of Festivals:  A Celebration of Greece" event, and for liquor licensing purposes, decided not to declare the "Festival of Festivals: A Celebration of Greece", an outdoor event, at the Armenian Community Centre, 50 Hallcrown Place, from Thursday, July 3 to Tuesday, July 8, 2014, from 4:00 to 11:00 p.m. daily, as an event of municipal significance and the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario be advised of this decision.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events for Municipal Significance for liquor licensing purposes.

Speakers

Adonis Artemaki, President, Greek Community of Toronto
George Nikopoulos, Vice-President, Greek Community of Toronto
John Kakagiannis, Greek Community of Toronto
Charles Macleod, representing the Festival of Festivals - A Celebration of Greece organizers

Communications (Community Council)

(May 7, 2014) Letter from Christine Moon, Korean Canadian Business Association of North Toronto, requesting that the 13th Annual "Korean Harvest Festival" also known as the "Harvest Moon Festival", to be held on Saturday, September 6, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. - 10:30 p.m. and Sunday, September 7, 2014, from 1:00 p.m. - 10:30 p.m. at Mel Lastman Square, be declared an event of Municipal Significance (NY.Main.NY33.42.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-47845.pdf
(May 28, 2014) Letter from Kim Keitner, Marketing Manager & Event Coordinator, Fresh City Farms, requesting that the Fresh City Farms Open Farm event and Beer Garden on Sunday, June 22, 2014 from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at 70 Canuck Avenue, Downsview Park, be declared an event of Municipal Significance. (NY.Main.NY33.42.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-47846.pdf
(May 21, 2014) Letter from James Heron, Executive Director, Japanese Canadian Cultural Centre, requesting a liquor licence extension for a "Beer Garden" as part of the annual Summer Festival to be held on Saturday, July 12, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:30 p.m. at the Kobayashi Garden Court, 6 Garamond Court, Toronto. (NY.Main.NY33.42.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-47887.pdf

NY33.44 - Final Report - Common Elements Condominium Application and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 2500 Bayview Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
Bill 653 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium for the lands at 2500 Bayview Avenue, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration;  and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

2.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 2500 Bayview Avenue as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire  two years following enactment by City Council.

 

3.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

4.         Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.

 

6.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on June 17, 2014.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application for Draft Plan of Condominium proposes the creation of a common element condominium comprised of a driveway and a walkway, associated with eight townhouse units.  A concurrent application proposes exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act to allow for the creation of conveyable lots for these eight townhouse units.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium and approval of the Part Lot Control exemption.  In addition, this report recommends that the owner of the lands be required to register a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to convey or mortgage any part of the lands without prior consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on Common Elements Condominium Application and a Part Lot Control Exemption Application for 2500 Bayview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69956.pdf

NY33.45 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 99 Finch Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend North York Zoning By-law No. 7625, for the lands at 99 Finch Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to the City Council for enactment, City Council requre the applicant to obtain Notice of Approval Conditions under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, North York District, in consultation with the local Councillor.

 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on June 17, 2014.

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to legalize the conversion of a 1.5 storey residential dwelling to a business and professional office use. Eight at-grade parking spaces are proposed at the rear of the property.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the draft by-law attached to this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 99 Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69758.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 27, 2014) E-mail from Saeed Joshaghani (NY.Main.NY33.45.1)

NY33.46 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Lifting the 'H' - 35 Tangiers Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West
Attention
Bills 676 and 677 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 35 Tangiers Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendments attached as Attachment No. 5a and 5b to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District. 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

           

a.         a $250,000 cash payment to be used for local park land improvements, including Fountainhead Park and/or streetscape improvements on Finch Avenue West in the vicinity of the Finch West TTC Subway station, $50,000 of which is to be paid prior to the enactment of the Bills and the remaining $200,000 is to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the development, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement registration to the date of payment.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 35 Tangiers Road to permit the development of an eight (8) storey, 35.4 metre high, medical office building with commercial uses at grade and on the second floor, including a drive-through facility.  The proposed building would have a density of 2.5 FSI and would provide 260 parking spaces, 10 of which would be at grade and 250 would be located in two levels of underground parking.

 

This application also proposes to lift the 'H' symbol tied to the subject property.  The H requires that a Traffic Impact Study be submitted, reviewed and found acceptable to City staff.  This condition has been satisfied.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application and Lifting the 'H' for 35 Tangiers Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69709.pdf

Speakers

Moiz Behar, on behalf of the applicant

NY33.47 - Final Report - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 591 Finch Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre
Attention
Bill 694 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 7625, for the lands at 591 Finch Avenue West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to report (May 28, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council request Planning Staff to negotiate a mutually agreed upon public art contribution to be secured by way of a Section 37 agreement, if consensus can be reached.

 

4.         City Council request the local Councillor to meet with the local community and the appropriate staff in the Transportation Services Division to review and discuss traffic density and parking issues in the area.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application is to amend site-specific Zoning By-law No. 661-2011 for 591 Finch Avenue West.  The applicant is seeking 2 additional floors, 22 additional units and changes to the building envelope.  The building will be a 12-storey residential building containing 78 units and 73 underground parking spaces with vehicular access from Goldfinch Court, at 591 Finch Avenue West.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the  Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment Application for 591 Finch Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69892.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached to the Motion by Councillor James Pasternak
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71495.pdf

Speakers

Saul Libstug
Ken Sigesmund
Vivian Leung
Yvonne Booth
Sheldon Goldberg
Sandra Goldberg
Farhad Morsh, applicant

Communications (Community Council)

(June 4, 2014) E-mail from Rochelle Geller (NY.New.NY33.47.1)

NY33.48 - Final Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 464-468 Winona Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
Bills 703 and 704 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 464-468 Winona Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 7 to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         City Council amend former City of York Zoning By-law 1-83, for the lands at 464-468 Winona Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         City Council direct staff in Community Planning, North York District, to hold one or more Site Plan Working Group Meeting(s) with staff and interested community members.

 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

An application has been submitted to amend the City's Official Plan and Zoning By-law No. 1-83 for the former City of York for the lands at 464 - 468 Winona Drive. The application seeks to permit 16 four-storey townhouse dwelling units in two blocks of 8 units and a height of 11.85 metres, with 19 parking spaces provided at grade and accessed through a common element driveway.

 

The proposed townhouse development is appropriate on this long, narrow site located between the existing 5-storey apartment building and a row of low rise detached and semi-detached dwellings.  It has good setbacks and transition to the abutting land uses. The proposal would result in a compact, low-rise residential development, thus making efficient use of land and existing infrastructure, including public services and facilities, parks and open spaces and recreation facilities.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law 1-83 for the former City of York to permit a 4 – storey, 16-unit, townhouse development.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Final Report and Attachements 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 464-468 Winona Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69895.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69896.pdf
Attachment 8 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69897.pdf

Speakers

Michael Goldberg, Goldberg Group
Jonas Cope
Hugh Alcock
Daniel Greenstein

Communications (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) E-mail from Vasile Lazos (NY.Main.NY33.48.1)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Dan Greenstein (NY.New.NY33.48.2)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Amy I. Cooney (NY.New.NY33.48.3)

NY33.51 - Final Report - North York Centre Secondary Plan Section 37 Density Incentives and Parkland Dedication Policies

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
23 - Willowdale, 24 - Willowdale
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY33.51a with recommendations)

Bill 713 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt an amendment to the North York Centre Secondary Plan, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment in Attachment 5 to the report (May 28, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.

 

2.         Upon approval of the Official Plan Amendment, City Council authorize the appropriate City Staff to bring forward an amendment to Attachment 1(a) of By-law 1420-2007 to include North York Centre as a Secondary Plan area where the Official Plan's Alternative Dedication Rates Apply.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This report summarizes Staff’s review of the Section 37 Density Incentives and Parkland Dedication Policies in the North York Centre Secondary Plan and recommends approval of a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment.

 

The amendment is intended to: increase the amount and quality of parkland within and serving the North York Centre; harmonize the North York Centre parkland dedication policies with the rest of the City; as well as, enable public facilities to be provided through development incentives and not be subject to the density limit in the North York Centre Secondary Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2014) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on North York Centre Secondary Plan Section 37 Density Incentives and Parkland Dedication Policies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-69908.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 2, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on North York Centre Secondary Plan Section 37 Density Incentives and Parkland Dedication Policies (NY33.51a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71289.pdf

Speakers

George Belza, Partner, Analogica
John Cappon

Communications (Community Council)

(June 16, 2014) Letter from John A. R. Dawson, McCarthy Tetrault LLP, on behalf of Silvercore Inc. (NY.New.NY33.51.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/comm/communicationfile-48191.pdf

NY33.52 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 2800 Keele Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
9 - York Centre
Attention
The City Solicitor has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (NY33.52a with recommendations)

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council submits to City Council, without recommendation, the report (June 13, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, entitled, "Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 2800 Keele Street", given that all motions placed lost on a tie vote.

 

Origin

(June 13, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit an eleven (11) storey mixed-use building, with a total gross floor area of 17,030 square metres, containing 216 residential units and 375 square metres of ground floor commercial space at 2800 Keele Street.  Vehicular access is proposed from Victory Drive to a 3-level underground parking structure containing 214 parking spaces to accommodate resident, visitor and commercial parking.

 

The applicant appealed its Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board citing City Council's lack of decision on the application within the time frame specified by the Planning Act.  The applicant also appealed the associated Site Plan Control application to the Ontario Municipal Board.  The Ontario Municipal Board has now set the date of July 16, 2014 to hear the appeals.   

 

The purpose of this report is to seek Council's direction for staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the proposed development at 2800 Keele Street.

 

Staff is recommending the City Solicitor and appropriate staff be authorized to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding site plan control issues.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 13, 2014) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-9 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications for 2800 Keele Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70585.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications for 2800 Keele Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70054.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 2, 2014) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on 2800 Keele Street - Request for Direction for OMB Hearing - Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications (NY33.52a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71266.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

NY33.56 - Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 12 Bannockburn Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain outside planning consultant(s) and authorize the City Solicitor and outside planning consultant(s) to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision.

Origin

(June 11, 2014) Memo from Councillor Stintz

Summary

On May 14, 2014 the Committee of Adjustment Refused a Consent application to sever the property into two lots. The retained lot would maintain a private Montessori school which operates within the school building owned by the Toronto District School Board. The severed lot has been declared surplus to the needs of the Toronto District school Board and would be developed at a later date. No variances were proposed at that time.

 

The Staff Report set out a number of conditions should the consent be approved.

 

The Committee of Adjustment Refused the Consent as in the opinion of the Committee, the application did not satisfy the requirements of Section 51(24) of the Planning Act and NOT approved for the following reason(s):

 

- The proposed land division is premature.

- The proposed land division does not conform to the policies of the official plan.

- The suitability of the land for the purposes for which it is to be subdivided has not been demonstrated.

- The suitability of the dimensions and shapes of the proposed lots has not been demonstrated.

 

On June 10th, 2014, the applicant appealed the Committee of Adjustment Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. A hearing has not been scheduled as yet.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 11, 2014) Memo from Councillor Stintz on Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 12 Bannockburn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70497.pdf
Attachment 1 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel on Committee of Adjustment Application for 12 Bannockburn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70519.pdf
Attachment 2 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Consent Application - 12 Bannockburn Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-70520.pdf

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 33

SC33.2 - Permanent Closure - The Un-travelled Portions of Danforth Avenue and Lillington Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Bill 640 has been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the permanent closure of the un-travelled portions of Danforth Avenue and Lillington Avenue, designed as Parts 1 and 2 respectively on Reference Plan 66R-27380 and shown as Parts 1 and 2 respectively on the Sketch No. PS-2008-166 (the "Highways"), attached to the report dated May 5, 2014, from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report dated May 5, 2014, from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City's web site.  No one appeared before the Community Council.

Origin

(May 5, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

Transportation Services recommends that the un-travelled portion of Danforth Avenue and the un-travelled portion of Lillington Avenue in the block bounded by Birchmount Avenue, Pinegrove Avenue, South Woodrow Boulevard and Danforth Avenue, be permanently closed for the operational transfer to Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 5, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Permanent Closure - The Un-travelled Portions of Danforth Avenue and Lillington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69561.pdf
Attachment 1 - Draft By-law - To permanently close untravelled portions of Danforth Avenue and Lillington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70027.pdf
Attachment 2 - Sketch No. PS-2008-166 dated December 12, 2008
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69562.pdf
Public Notice - Proposal to Close the Un-travelled Portions of Danforth Avenue and Lillington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69563.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Sue Mason (SC.New.SC33.2.1)

SC33.4 - Lane Designations - Comstock Road at Warden Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
35 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
Bill 655 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the one way traffic lane regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

This report describes the need to install lane designation signage at the intersection of Comstock Road and Warden Avenue.

 

It is recommended that a separate eastbound left-turn lane and one shared through /right turn lane be regulated at this intersection. The signage and pavement markings will clearly define the traffic lane usage and mitigate potential conflicts between through and turning traffic.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Lane Designations - Comstock Road at Warden Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69808.pdf
Location Plan - Comstock Road at Warden Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69849.pdf

SC33.10 - Traffic Control Signals - 2201 Markham Road at the Private Access

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
41 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at 2201 Markham Road at the private access approximately 500 metres south of Finch Avenue East.

 

2.         City Council enact the turn regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of traffic control signals on Markham Road at the private access to the proposed development at 2201 Markham Road.

 

Traffic impact studies indicated that projected future traffic volumes generated from the proposed development will require traffic control signals. To enhance traffic safety and turning movements from this site, traffic control signals should be installed.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Traffic Control Signals - 2201 Markham Road at the Private Access
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69881.pdf
Location Plan - 2201 Markham Road at the Private Access
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69882.pdf

SC33.14 - Turning Regulations - Tams Road at Morningside Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
43 - Scarborough East
Attention
Bill 657 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact the turning regulations, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

Following a neighbourhood survey from Councillor Paul Ainslie's office of residents, the purpose of this report is to introduce turning regulations at the intersection of Tams Road and Morningside Avenue.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Report and Appendix 1 from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69890.pdf
Location Plan - Tams Road at Morningside Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69891.pdf

SC33.15 - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment to the Highland Creek Secondary Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, to bring forward to Scarborough Community Council a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to delete Site and Area Specific Policy No.15 in the Highland Creek Secondary Plan with respect to 21 Morrish Road,  6030 and 6032 Kingston Road.

Origin

(May 9, 2014) Letter from City Council

Summary

City Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014, referred Motion MM51.32 to the Scarborough Community Council.

 

In order to better reflect City Council's intention to enact Official Plan Amendment Number 187 (10 303518 EPS 44 TM) in accordance with the map attached as Attachment "A" to Council's decision of November 27, 2012, it is recommended that Staff be directed to undertake a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to delete Site and Area Specific Policy No.15 with respect to 21 Morrish Road, 6030 and 6032 Kingston Road.

 

Specifically, Part 1(b) approved by Council recommended that Site and Area Specific Policy No. 15 permit heights of up to 6 storeys whereas the Zoning By-law approved by Council permitted heights of up to 4 storeys.  The purpose of the City-initiated amendment would be to accurately reflect the intention of Scarborough Community Council to permit only 4 storeys on the properties known municipally as 21 Morrish Road, 6030 and 6032 Kingston Road, by deleting Site and Area Specific Policy No.15.

 

(Submitted to City Council on May 6 and 7, 2014 as MM51.32)

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 9, 2014) Letter from City Council - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment to the Highland Creek Secondary Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69520.pdf
Attachment A to Council's decision of November 27, 2012 - Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69619.pdf

SC33.16 - Span McCowan and Market Building Proposal

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council refer the following recommendation to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee:

 

"a.        In conjunction with planning for the future Scarborough Subway Station, the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the City Planning and Parks, Forestry and Recreation Divisions, retain qualified engineering consultant services to prepare preliminary designs together with feasibility studies and preliminary cost estimates to build a pedestrian deck across McCowan Road in the area between the RT overpass structure and the Progress Bridge to provide a safe, direct and attractive grade-separated crossing of this major arterial road for pedestrians, cyclists, and people with movement challenges uniting the two neighbourhoods on either side of McCowan Road. Deck designs shall advance beyond purely utilitarian and be of sufficient width to create attractive public space including landscaping and public art but not classified as a ‘tunnel’".

 

2.         City Council request the Director of Parks, in consultation with the Director of Real Estate Services and Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to report on the costs to create attractive public open space on a deck over McCowan Road compared to the cost to create an equal sized public open space elsewhere in the Scarborough Centre including costs to acquire land, demolish buildings, decontaminate lands and landscape the property as well as foregone employment and municipal tax revenue.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Manager, Engineering Design Group, Construction and Engineering Division, to undertake a comprehensive alignment design concurrently with the Scarborough Centre Transportation Master Plan to determine exactly where Bushby Drive is to be extended that includes east/west road capacity for cars, buses and trucking as well as pedestrians and cyclists.

 

4.         City Council request the Director of Real Estate Services, in consultation with the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, the Chief Planner and Build Toronto, to retain qualified market consultants to conduct a feasibility study of 4,400 m2 of food retailing and related services, located in the Scarborough Centre and modelled on the main floor of the South St. Lawrence Market building at Front and Jarvis Streets. The Study shall consider a market building is:

 

a.         built with public funding secured through Section 37;

b.         located on public land within the Scarborough Centre;

c.         managed by a Community Board appointed by Council;

d.         tenanted by independent, non-chain merchants reflective of/responding to Scarborough’s ethnic diversity.

 

5.         City Council request the Director of Real Estate Services, in consultation with the Chief Planner, the Toronto District School Board and Build Toronto, to examine the feasibility of repurposing some of the industrial buildings at 705 Progress Avenue to permit retail stores, restaurants and such other uses as may be required to allow development of a “Market for Scarborough” as an ancillary use to the planned public park and school site on this publicly owned park property modeled on the South St. Lawrence Market at Front and Jarvis Streets.

Origin

(May 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This report responds to a direction from City Council to evaluate the feasibility of constructing a deck park (“Span McCowan”) across McCowan Road between Progress Avenue and Bushby Drive/Town Centre Court, as well as a stand-alone market building to serve as a specialty retail destination within the Scarborough Centre.  The direction originated from Scarborough Community Council following a presentation on Span McCowan by the Glen Andrew Community Association.

 

Following consultation with several City divisions, staff have determined that constructing an elevated deck park above McCowan Road south of Progress Avenue and north of the existing SRT corridor would be technically feasible, and would cost in the order of $40 million, including ongoing maintenance over fifty years.  The construction of a 4,400 square metre, stand-alone shell of a building to accommodate an indoor market would cost approximately $1.5 million, not including land acquisition costs or ongoing maintenance.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 2, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Span McCowan and Market Building Proposal
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69597.pdf
(April 23, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - Span McCowan and Market Building Proposal - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69598.pdf

Speakers

Iain McLeod, President, Glen Andrew Community Association
Jason Rodricks, President, North Bendale Community Association
James Burchell, Sellabrate Scarborough

Communications (Community Council)

(May 2, 2014) Letter from Lorne Ross, on behalf of Glen Andrew Community Association, Midland Park Community Association, Condo Boards of 68 Corporate Drive and Omni Drive (SC.Main.SC33.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47752.pdf
(May 9, 2014) Letter from Lorne Ross correcting his letter dated May 2, 2014 (SC.Main.SC33.16.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-47751.pdf
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Guy D'Onofrio, Vice-President, and Mike Mestyan, Director of Planning, The Goldman Group (SC.New.SC33.16.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/comm/communicationfile-48155.pdf

SC33.20 - 2933 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
40 - Scarborough Agincourt

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Sullivan Community Zoning By-law No. 10717, for the lands at 2933 Sheppard Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-laws as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to make arrangements satisfactory to the Manager, Traffic Control and Safety Systems, for any and all costs associated with traffic control signal modifications at all intersections analyzed in the traffic impact study, including but not limited to phasing optimization/timing modifications, hardware and plant modifications.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a.         The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.          An indexed cash payment of $425,000.00, payable to the City of Toronto, prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, to be used as follows:

 

-           $240,000 towards capital improvements to Tam O'Shanter Park

-           $185,000 towards capital improvements to Scarden Park. 

 

b.         The owner to provide a title opinion to the City for the agreement's registration to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor

 

c.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:

 

i.          A requirement that all offers and agreements of purchase and sale entered into shall include a warning clause advising of the potential future access restrictions to Sheppard Avenue East.

 

ii.         The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting of October 26 and 27, 2009.

 

iii.        The Owner shall design and construct the building substantially in conformity with the architectural design identified on plans on file with the Chief Planner, prepared by Keith Loffler Architects, dated April 30, 2014, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, the further details of which, including exterior materials, will be refined on approved plans and drawings as part of any site plan approval pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, and shall be further secured in any Site Plan Agreement with the City for the project.

 

iv         The Owner agree to post and maintain signs on site and include warning clauses in all offers of purchase and sale advising purchasers of the status of local Toronto District School Board public school accommodation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to develop the subject 0.36 hectare (0.9 acre) parcel of land at 2933 Sheppard Avenue East with an 18 storey, 179 unit residential condominium with 281 square metres (3,025 square feet) of commercial space at grade.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the zoning by-law.  The development consists of a mixed use building with both retail and residential uses in an area that has sufficient infrastructure. Staff conclude that the proposed height, density and scale of the development are appropriate for the site and the local area.   Further, the development will add to the vitality of Sheppard Avenue East as a mixed use area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 2933 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69905.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 2933 Sheppard Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69906.pdf
Evans Planning Segment Study
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69907.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 24, 2014) E-mail from France Dupont (SC.Main.SC33.20.1)
(May 25, 2014) E-mail from Emily Chang Liu (SC.Main.SC33.20.2)

SC33.21 - 3260 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment and Subdivision Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
40 - Scarborough Agincourt

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the former City of Scarborough Sullivan Community Zoning By-law No. 10717, as amended, for the lands at 3260 Sheppard Avenue East substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 13 to report dated May 28, 2014, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bill to City Council for enactment, the Owner’s consulting engineer must verify available capacity in existing local and trunk sanitary sewer systems and identify any infrastructure improvements or upgrades that may be necessary to accommodate the proposed development. Where flow records are not available and/or design flows are approaching existing sewer system capacity, a capacity analysis must be undertaken based on actual/recoded flows to determine whether the existing system has adequate capacity to receive anticipated flows from the proposed development to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.  In the event that there is insufficient capacity to accommodate this development the obligations for the owner to undertake the work shall be set out in a financially secured agreement or other alternative arrangement, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bill to Council for enactment the Owner shall have satisfied all obligations to lift the holding provisions on the lands pursuant to former City of Scarborough By-law No. 10717, as amended, and the by-law to lift the holding provisions will have been enacted or will be introduced concurrent with the Bill contemplated in Recommendation No. 1.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following:

 

a.         payment of a cash contribution of $975,000.00, to be directed towards capital improvements to the Agincourt District Branch of the Toronto Public Library, payable prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit and indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the registration of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment;

 

b.         construction and maintenance of the development in accordance with Tier 1 - required measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee; and in accordance with Tier 2 - voluntary measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee; and further the provision to the City of documentation of LEED registration and certification of the proposed development, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning;

 

c.         provision and maintenance of interim landscape works following completion of phase one (comprised of the two 29-storey towers and associated interior facilities), substantially in conformity with the landscape design identified on Phase One Landscape Masterplan, L1-d, prepared by NAK Design Group, dated April 24, 2014, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, the details of which will be refined on approved plans and drawings in the context of site plan approval pursuant to Section 114, of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended and, as applicable, Section 41 of the Planning Act, as amended, and secured in a Site Plan Agreement with the City.

 

d.         provision of the following matters in support of development at the owners expense:

 

i.          streetscape improvements to the right-of-way abutting the subject property, including but not limited to: TTC bus stop re-location, street lighting, pavers, street furniture and tree trench installation, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division, the Executive Director, Transportation Services Division and the General Manager, Toronto Transit Commission which details shall be submitted for review and approval in the context of site plan approval pursuant to Section 114, of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as amended and, as applicable, Section 41 of the Planning Act, as amended and secured in a Site Plan Agreement with the City; and

 

ii.         construction of required improvements to municipal infrastructure, both internal and external to the development, in connection with a Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, submitted to and accepted by the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

 

6.         In accordance with the delegated approval under by-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 2 to report dated May 28, 2014 subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 14 to report dated May 28, 2014, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior final approval and the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes a mixed-use, multi-phase development, targeted to seniors, on the property at 3260 Sheppard Avenue East. The proposal consists of two 29-storey point towers fronting on Sheppard Avenue East, two 10-storey mid-rise buildings behind the towers and 17 three-storey townhouse units at the rear of the property.  A common base building, providing retail space, senior's facilities and retirement home units, is proposed to connect the towers and mid-rise buildings.  Two new public roads, creating two development blocks, are also proposed to provide access to the rear of the site.  A total of 797 units, 755 parking spaces and 396 bike parking spaces are contemplated with the project.

 

This proposal represents an urbanized approach to intensification along a proposed higher-order transit corridor that was envisioned when the Sheppard Warden Avenue Study was completed in 2011.  It provides an infill development that will help to re-invigorate the area, while at the same time recognizes the sensitivities that arise when a project abuts an established residential neighbourhood.  The proposed roads, development blocks and built form are all closely aligned with what had been contemplated with the implementing Official Plan and zoning by-law amendments from the Avenue Study.


This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law. This report also advises that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision, subject to appropriate conditions of approval.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-14 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3260 Sheppard Avenue East - Zoning Amendment and Subdivision Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69901.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 3260 Sheppard Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69902.pdf

Speakers

Matthew Gregor

SC33.22 - 67 Kirkdene Drive - Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East
Attention
Communication SC33.22.2 has been submitted on this Item

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Centennial Community Zoning By-law No. 12077, as amended, for the lands at 67 Kirkdene Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report dated May 30, 2014, from the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 67 Kirkdene Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report dated May 30, 2014, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.

 

4.         In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner may approve the draft plan of subdivision, as generally illustrated on Attachment No. 2, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions of approval as generally listed in Attachment No. 8, which must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed plan of subdivision or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the applicant to resolve any outstanding concerns with the City’s Engineering and Construction Services Division including:

 

a.         Verification of available capacity in existing local and trunk sanitary sewer systems and identification of any infrastructure improvements or upgrades that may be necessary to accommodate the proposed development to satisfaction of the Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

 

b.         Water demand analysis with hydrant testing.

 

c.         Any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the site servicing assessment, should it be determined that upgrades to such infrastructure is required to support the development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

The rezoning and associated draft plan of subdivision applications propose the redevelopment of the subject lands with six (6), two-storey semi-detached dwellings on 3 new lots fronting a proposed public road.

 

The proposed land use conforms to the Official Plan and is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) and conforms and does not conflict with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe. The use is compatible with adjacent uses and will allow for the appropriate infill development of the site.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law and advises that the Chief Planner may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 67 Kirkdene Drive - Zoning Amendment, Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69898.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 67 Kirkdene Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-69899.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 14, 2014) E-mail from Nicole Corrado (SC.New.SC33.22.1)

Communications (City Council)

(July 8, 2014) E-mail from Stefanie Valente (CC.New.SC33.22.2)

SC33.23 - 59 Brinloor Boulevard - Application to Remove a Private Tree

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council deny the permit for an application to remove the privately owned Norway maple tree at 59 Brinloor Boulevard.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council requested the City Solicitor to report back on a summary of legal issues and responses regarding the Tree By-law.

Origin

(June 6, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report recommends that City Council deny the permit for an application to remove one (1) privately owned tree.  The owner has requested tree removal due to its proximity to a 1.2 m high chain link fence between properties.

 

The subject tree is a Norway maple (Acer platanoides), measuring 38 cm in diameter, located in the backyard of the property.  The tree is in good condition.  Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 6, 2014) Report and Attachment 1 from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 59 Brinlook Boulevard - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-70271.pdf

Speakers

Margaret Wilkins
Sal Frijio

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 33

TE33.2 - Final Report - 50 and 52 Bartlett Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
Communication TE33.2.1 has been submitted on this Item

Bills 710 and 715 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, and 569-2013 as amended, for the lands at 50 and 52 Bartlett Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendments, attached as Attachments 7 and 8 to the report (May 16, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a 3-storey, L-shaped apartment building, by conversion of an existing industrial building.  The building would contain 16 dwelling units and 17 vehicular parking spaces at 50 and 52 Bartlett Avenue.

 

The proposal provides an acceptable use of this laneway building within a Neighbourhoods designation in keeping with the policies of the Official Plan.  This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 50 and 52 Bartlett Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70010.pdf
Attachment 7 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 438-86 - 50 and 52 Bartlett Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70731.pdf
Maps to Attachment 7 - 50 and 52 Bartlett Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70733.pdf
Attachment 8 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 569-2013 - 50 and 52 Bartlett Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70732.pdf
Diagrams to Attachment 8 - 50 and 52 Bartlett Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70809.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(July 2, 2014) Letter from Jelena Vulovic (CC.Main.TE33.2.1)

TE33.3 - Final Report - 547-555 College Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Communication TE33.3.4 has been submitted on this Item

Bills 685 and 686 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 547, 549, and 555 College Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment, attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (May 20, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 547,549, and 555 College Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (May 20, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

           

a.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement to support development:

 

i.          A minimum of 10% of the residential units be comprised of 3 bedrooms with a minimum gross floor area of 79 square metres.

 

ii.         A minimum of 15% of the residential units be comprised of 2 bedroom units.

 

iii.        Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the owner will submit a Construction Management Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and thereafter in support of the development, shall implement the plan during the course of construction. The Construction Management Plan will include, but not limited to, details regarding size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring activities, measures to ensure safety lighting does not negatively impact adjacent residences, construction vehicle parking locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and any other matters deemed necessary.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to addresses all outstanding comments in Part 1-A of Development Engineering's Memorandum dated April 9, 2014, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to construct an 8-storey mixed-use building containing 77 residential dwelling units and ground floor retail at 547-555 College Street. A total of 48 parking spaces are proposed to be provided in 3 levels of underground parking, accessed of the rear laneway. 

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 547-555 College Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69877.pdf
Revised Attachment 7 - Application Data Sheet - Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 547-555 College Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70698.pdf
Attachment. No. 8 - Draft Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 438-86 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 547-555 College Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70699.pdf
Attachment No. 9 - Drawing Zoning By-law Amendment to By-law No. 569-2013 - Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 547-555 College Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70682.pdf

Speakers

Astra Burka (Submission Filed)
Anne Benedetti, Goodmans LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Chris and Mary Grimaldi and Jo-Lynn Grimaldi (TE.Supp.TE33.3.1)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Bruno Pileggi (TE.Supp.TE33.3.2)
(June 17, 2014) Submission from Astra Burka (TE.Supp.TE33.3.3)

Communications (City Council)

(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Gus Teotonio (CC.Main.TE33.3.4)

TE33.4 - Final Report - 41 Dovercourt Road - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 682 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended for the lands at 41 Dovercourt Rd substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (May 14, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, City Council require the owner to submit a Construction Management Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and thereafter in support of the development, shall implement the plan during the course of construction. The Construction Management Plan will include, but not limited to, details regarding size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring activities, measures to ensure safety lighting does not negatively impact adjacent residences, construction vehicle parking locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and any other matters deemed necessary.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to construct a ten-storey mixed-use building with three levels of underground parking at 41 Dovercourt Road.  The building will contain non-residential uses in a two storey podium, with 75 residential units above.

 

The proposal will have an overall gross floor area of 9,578 square metres, of which 2,434 square metres will be allocated to the non-residential uses on the first two storeys. A total of 82 parking spaces are proposed on site. Parking and loading are accessed off of Sudbury Street from the public lane at the east side of the property.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 14, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 41 Dovercourt Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70023.pdf
Attachment 8 - Draft Zoning By-law - 41 Dovercourt Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70490.pdf

Speakers

David Huynh, Bousfields Inc.
David Capelli

Communications (Community Council)

(June 6, 2014) E-mail from Jocelyn Laurence (TE.Supp.TE33.4.1)
(June 12, 2014) Letter from Andrew Dales, Dales Consulting (TE.Supp.TE33.4.2)
(June 14, 2014) E-mail from Laura Colosimo (TE.Supp.TE33.4.3)

TE33.5 - Final Report - 455 Dovercourt Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bills 678, 679 and 680 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 455 Dovercourt Road substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (May 30, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 455 Dovercourt Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the supplementary report (June 11, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:

 

a.         deleting Part 1.(5) and replacing it with the following:

 

(5)        The height of the building or structure on the lot, must not exceed the height permitted as indicated by the letter "H" as shown on Map 2 attached to and forming part of this By-law, as measured from the Canadian Geodetic Datum elevation of 106.18 metres;

 

              b.       deleting Part 1.(10) and replacing it with the following:

 

(10)      A minimum of 190 square metres of landscaped open space shall be provided on the lot; and

 

c.         replacing Map 2 with the revised Map 2 attached to the motion by Councillor Layton.

 

3.         City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 455 Dovercourt Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the supplementary report (June 11, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:

 

a.         deleting Part 1(F) and replacing it with the following:

 

"(F)       The height of any building or structure on the lot must not exceed the maximum height permitted as indicated by the letter “H” as shown on Diagram 2 of By-law [Clerks to supply By-law No.], measured from the Canadian Geodetic Datum elevation of 106.18 metres.";

 

b.         deleting Part 1(K) and replacing it with the following:

 

"(K)       A minimum of 190 square metres of soft landscaping shall be provided on the lot."; and

 

c.         replacing Diagram 2 with the Diagram 2 attached to the motion from Councillor Layton.

 

4.         Prior to introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, the owner must provide:

 

i.          Documentation to demonstrate that the owner is entitled to erect four parking stackers within the 1.0 metre wide easement on the east side of the site, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application is for an Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to permit a four-storey mixed-use building with commercial uses at grade and on the second floor and 12 two-storey condominium units above. Currently, a 3-storey building exists on the site, the first two storeys will be retained and the third will be partially demolished to accommodate an addition. A total of 25 parking spaces are being provided for the proposed development along the north, south and east sides of the property as well as off-site, of which 12 are for residential use and 13 are for non-residential use.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 455 Dovercourt Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70030.pdf
Map 2 - Submitted by Councillor Layton - 455 Dovercourt Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70792.pdf
Diagram 2 - Submitted by Councillor Layton - 455 Dovercourt Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70793.pdf

Speakers

Jamie Phelan
Kim Harris
Craig Hunter, Principal, Hunter and Associates Ltd.

Communications (Community Council)

(June 16, 2014) Letter from Kim Harris, Chris Sonntag and Adrienne Recknagel and James Phelan (TE.Supp.TE33.5.1)

5a - Supplementary Report - 455 Dovercourt Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications

Origin
(June 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This report is further to the May 30, 2014 report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District recommending approval of the proposed Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment for 455 Dovercourt Road. 

 

The owner has agreed to provide the necessary documentation to demonstrate that a long-term lease agreement has been secured for 4 non-residential parking spaces on a parking lot within 300 metres of the subject site, to the satisfaction of Transportation Services, prior to issuance of a building permit. This change has been reflected through an amendment to Recommendation No. 4 of the May 30, 2014 report.

 

This report provides draft zoning by-laws attached as Attachment 1 and 2. The residential gross floor area and non-residential gross floor area in the attached Draft Zoning By-laws varies from the gross floor areas noted in the May 30, 2014 report as they have been calculated based on detailed calculations included in Zoning By-laws 438-86 and 569-2013.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 455 Dovercourt Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment Applications - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70523.pdf

TE33.6 - Final Report - 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (TE33.6b for information)

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 89-109 Niagara Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the supplementary report (June 11, 2014), from the Director of Community Planning, Toronto and East York District. 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following:

           

a.         The provision of 21 rental housing units, including 13 affordable rental housing units and 8 mid-range rental housing units, all of which are live-work units, and their maintenance as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and as provided for in Schedule "A" of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment.

 

b.         $150,000.00 for the purpose of capital improvements to existing rental housing units provided by Toronto Community Housing Corporation in Ward 19.

 

c.         $100,000.00 for the purpose of improving existing parks in Ward 19.

 

d.         Noise and vibration mitigation measures as identified in the Addendum to the Environmental Noise & Vibration Feasibility Study dated April 7, 2014, prepared by Gradient Microclimate Engineering Inc., and the associated peer review dated April 11, 2014, prepared by Aercoustics Engineering Limited.

 

e.         Odour mitigation measures as identified in the Assessment of Potential Odour Impacts from a Nearby Abattoir dated December 2012, prepared by Zorix Environmental, and the associated peer review dated November 26, 2013, prepared by Ortech Environmental.

 

f.          Warning clauses and restrictive covenants in all purchase and sale agreements regarding the potential for noise and odour impacts from the nearby abattoir and the potential for noise impacts from road and rail sources, as detailed under the heading "Section 37 of the Planning Act" of this report.

 

g.         A minimum of 30 on-street bicycle parking spaces.

 

h.         Car-share agreement in place prior to construction, if car-share parking spaces replace parking spaces otherwise required for residential occupants, at a ratio of 1 car-share parking space to 4 residential occupant parking spaces, up to a maximum of 6 car-share parking spaces.

 

i.          A minimum of 30% of all the dwelling units on the lot shall be 2-bedroom units.

 

j.          A minimum of 10% of all the dwelling units on the lot shall be 3-bedroom units.

 

k.         A Construction Management Plan to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

l.          A Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the properties located at 89-91 Niagara Street, 93-97 Niagara Street, 100-107 Niagara Street and 109 Niagara Street dated February 2012 and revised March 2014, prepared by Bernard H. Watt Architect, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

m.        A Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, to be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any permit for the properties at 89-91 Niagara Street, 93-97 Niagara Street, 100-107 Niagara Street and 109 Niagara Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage buildings.

 

4.         City Planning provide further information on the provision of 21 rental housing units in the proposed development and propose any needed adjustments to the draft Zoning By-law attached as Attachment No. 7 through a Supplementary Report to Toronto and East York Community Council at the meeting scheduled for either June 17, 2014, or August 12, 2014.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment of the proposed Zoning By-law Amendment, City Council require that the owner shall have entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the properties at 89-91 Niagara Street, 93-97 Niagara Street, 100-107 Niagara Street and 109 Niagara Street to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to provide details of the implementation for the rental housing provision of the recommendation to City Council for consideration at its meeting on July 8, 2014.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes the redevelopment of the lands at 89-109 Niagara Street for a new mixed-use development which includes the retention and reuse of the existing heritage buildings facing Niagara Street, commonly referred to as the "coffin factory", and the addition of two residential towers 12 and 14 stories in height connected by a five-storey podium.  The proposed uses include six ground floor commercial/office units and 367 residential dwellings, all of which permit live-work units.

 

The proposed rezoning is consistent with the current Official Plan and with the City Council-approved amendments to the Official Plan (Official Plan Amendment No. 231) currently awaiting Ministerial approval.   The rezoning will provide for the rehabilitation of the existing heritage buildings through a Heritage Easement Agreement.  Appropriate noise and odour mitigation measures will be secured that address land use compatibility between the proposed mixed-use development and the nearby abattoir at 2 Tecumseth Street, should the abattoir reinstate operations.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69885.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(June 30, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Rental Housing (TE33.6b)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71278.pdf

Speakers

David Kendall (Submission Filed)
Patrisha Robertson, Niagara Neighbourhood Now Residents' Committee

Communications (Community Council)

(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Rosalie Lam (TE.Supp.TE33.6.1)
(June 13, 2014) Letter from Patrisha Robertson, Niagara Neighbourhood Now Residents' Committee (TE.Supp.TE33.6.2)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Jeff Biggar (TE.Supp.TE33.6.3)
(June 17, 2014) Submission from David Kendall (TE.Supp.TE33.6.4)

6a - Supplementary Report - 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Rental Housing

Origin
(June 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This report provides additional information regarding rental housing further to the Final Report dated May 26, 2014, for the proposed rezoning at 89-109 Niagara Street.  The Final Report recommends approval of the proposed rezoning and recommends that the owner enter into a Section 37 Agreement under the Planning Act to secure community benefits including the provision of 21 rental housing units. 

 

The rezoning application proposes the redevelopment of the lands at 89-109 Niagara Street for a new mixed-use development which includes the retention and reuse of the existing heritage buildings facing Niagara Street, commonly referred to as the "coffin factory", and the addition of two residential towers 12 and 14 stories in height connected by a five-storey podium.  The proposed uses include six ground floor commercial/office units and 367 residential dwellings, all of which permit live-work units.

 

This report provides further detail on the agreement reached with the owner to provide the rental housing units, and recommends revisions to the draft zoning by-law attached with the Final Report dated May 26, 2014, to secure the rental housing through a Section 37 Agreement under the Planning Act.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 89-109 Niagara Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report - Rental Housing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70509.pdf

TE33.7 - Final Report - Bathurst Street - Queen Street West to Dupont Street: Zoning Amendment and Official Plan Amendment Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Communication TE33.7.5 has been submitted on this Item

Bills 687 and 706 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council repeal Interim Control By-law No. 963-2013 for Bathurst Street from Queen Street West to Dupont Street and amend the retail and service uses in Section 12(2) 270 of By-law 438-86 by adopting the draft zoning by-law amendment found in Attachment 1 to the report (May 29, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-Law as may be required.

 

3.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to initiate a study of the Bloor-Bathurst four corners area found in Attachment 2 to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

4.         City Council authorize a Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study under Section 40.(1) of the Ontario Heritage Act for the area on Markham Street known as Markham Village, as shown in Attachment 2 to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

City Planning has completed the Council-directed planning study focussing on built form and land use on both sides of Bathurst Street from Dupont to Queen Street ("Better Bathurst Study").  One of the key objectives of the study is to better define the role Bathurst plays as a boundary between the area formally designated as "Downtown and Central Waterfront" (Official Plan Chapter 2, Map 2) and the rest of the City.

 

The motion can be found at the following link:

 

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2012.TE17.57

 

The study examined the land uses, built-form, heritage, retail characteristics, public realm, and policy framework.  Community consultation included four community meetings, one community workshop for the whole corridor, a visioning workshop for the Bathurst and Bloor four corners, and a survey on retail use and shopping patterns.

 

The outcome of the Study is a recommendation to amend Zoning By-law 438-86 Section 12(2)270 to regulate retail and service uses. In addition, an Official Plan Amendment is recommended to introduce a site and area-specific Official Plan Policy that defines the existing elements of the street to be retained and enhanced along with direction for areas of the street than can accommodate change.

 

In summary, the draft policy reinforces the prevailing fine grain character of the street while providing more emphasis on public realm and streetscape, heritage, character of the street, intersections with Avenues and with Dupont Street, and transition to adjacent residential uses. 

 

This report discusses the methodology, considerations, and community comments that informed the planning study and provides the planning rationale for the draft area-specific Official Plan policy.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Bathurst Street - Queen Street West to Dupont Street: Zoning Amendment and Official Plan Amendment Direction - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70047.pdf

Speakers

Michael Rosenberg

Communications (Community Council)

(June 13, 2014) E-mail from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP (TE.Supp.TE33.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48106.pdf
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Stefan Woloszczuk (TE.Supp.TE33.7.2)
(June 16, 2014) Letter from Catherine A. Lyons, Goodmans LLP (TE.Supp.TE33.7.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48167.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Letter from Ian Duke, Westbank Projects Bloor Development Corp. (TE.Supp.TE33.7.4)

Communications (City Council)

(July 3, 2014) E-mail from Stefan Woloszczuk (CC.Supp.TE33.7.5)

TE33.8 - Final Report - 260-270 King Street West and 274-322 King Street West City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has submitted a supplementary report on this item (TE33.8a with recommendations)

Communication TE33.8.5 has been submitted on this Item

Bill 684 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider the recommendations of the report (June 2, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, together with the recommendations of the Request for Direction and Working Group Outcome report for the lands at 260-270 and 274-322 King Street West, at its meeting of July 8 and 9, 2014.

 

2.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 260-270 and 274-322 King Street West substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (June 2, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The proposed amendment to Chapter 16 of the City’s Official Plan, being the King-Spadina Secondary Plan, would permit prescribed redevelopment of the lands with two mixed-use buildings, while conserving certain cultural and heritage resources at 260-270 and 274-322 King Street West, limiting the overall scale of the project and improving the public realm.  It is the opinion of staff that the amendment is required to address the land use policy framework for the lands and to limit opportunities for potential precedent implications in the King-Spadina Secondary Plan area.

 

This report recommends that City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with Attachment 1 of this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 260-270 King Street West and 274-322 King Street West City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70050.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 7, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on 260-270 King Street West and 274-322 King Street West, Working Group Outcomes and Zoning Amendment Application - Supplemental Request for Direction regarding the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing (TE33.8a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71353.pdf

Speakers

Karin Joeveer
Marc Kemerer, Blaney McMurtry LLP
Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, Grange Community Association
Caroline Langill, Dean, OCAD University
Patrick Devine, Dentons Canada LLP

Communications (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) E-mail from Kevin Allis (TE.Supp.TE33.8.1)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Brian Graff (TE.Supp.TE33.8.2)
(June 16, 2014) Letter from Marc Kemerer, Blaney McMurtry LLP (TE.Supp.TE33.8.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48162.pdf
(June 17, 2014) Submission from Karin Joeveer (TE.Supp.TE33.8.4)

Communications (City Council)

(June 24, 2014) Letter from Bruce C. Ketcheson, Ritchie Ketcheson Hart & Biggart LLP (CC.Main.TE33.8.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48443.pdf

TE33.9 - Final Report - 467 and 469 Spadina Road - Official Plan Amendment and Application for Residential Rental Demolition Under Municipal Code Ch. 667

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
Bill 714 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 467 and 469 Spadina Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council approve the application for a Section 111 permit in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 to allow the interior demolition of the 17 residential rental units at 467 and 469 Spadina Road to proceed subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         The rental units being demolished at 467 and 469 Spadina Road be replaced in the form of 8 townhouse residential rental units at 501R Logan Avenue (the Logan Lands), consisting of 2 units with affordable rents (1 two-bedroom and 1 three-bedroom) and 6 units with mid-range rents (5 two-bedroom and 1 three-bedroom units).

 

b.         The existing condominium status of the Logan Lands be terminated to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division (the Chief Planner) and the City Solicitor and the 8 townhouse units at the Logan Lands be provided and maintained as non-condominium rental housing units, all under the same ownership and on the same parcel of land, and that commencing the date the Official Plan comes into full force and effect and consistent with the City's practices on rental replacement:

 

i.          the replacement units be secured as rental housing for at least twenty (20) years;

 

ii.          the rents as set out in Recommendation 3.a. be maintained for at least ten years; and

 

iii.         the owner will continue to use reasonable efforts to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, to work with local non-profit organizations to identify and place suitable tenants into the two affordable rental replacement units, during the twenty-year period mentioned in part i. above.

  

c.         The owner provide notice and information, in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner, within two weeks following the date of the Official Plan Amendment coming into force and effect, to all tenants of the 8 townhouse units at the Logan Lands regarding the rent levels to be charged, and respective rights and obligations of tenants and the owner related to the provision and tenancy of the rental replacement units.

 

d.         The Official Plan Amendment in Recommendation 1 has come into full force and effect in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner.

 

e.         The owner obtain the necessary approvals for consent to sever and minor variances from the Committee of Adjustment for the creation of the proposed two residential semi-detached houses and the two lots at 467 and 469 Spadina Road (the Spadina Lands), all satisfactory to the Chief Planner including that any such approvals be conditional amongst other matters upon the Official Plan Amendment having come into full force and effect, the issuance of the Section 111 permit, the termination of the condominium registration of the Logan Lands, the entering into and registration of one or more agreements on the Logan Lands pursuant to Section 45(9.1) and/or Section 51(25) of the Planning Act by the owner of the Logan Lands with the City to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and the City Solicitor to secure the rental replacement at the Logan Lands, the registration of a Section 118 Restriction on the Logan Lands restricting any transfer or charge of the lands without the consent of the Chief Planner to secure the conditions in Recommendations 3.a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h, and the implementation of the consent and variances in this Recommendation 3.e, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and the City Solicitor, and the owner of the Spadina Lands entering into and registering an agreement in accordance with Recommendation 3.f.

 

f.          The owner of the Spadina Lands enters into and registers on title to the Spadina Lands, agreements pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and Section 45(9.1) and/or Section 51(25) of the Planning Act and registers a Section 118 Restriction on the Spadina Lands restricting any transfer or charge of the lands without the consent of the Chief Planner to secure the conditions in Recommendations 3.a, b, c, d, e. g and h, and the implementation of the consent and variances in Recommendation 3.e, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and in consultation with the Chief Planner, such agreements and Restriction to be released from the Spadina lands at such time as the Chief Planner and City Solicitor are satisfied such conditions have been met, that condition g. has been met, and the variances and consent have been implemented on the Spadina Lands.

 

g.         The owner of the Logan Lands enters into and registers on title to the Logan Lands, agreements pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and Section 45(9.1) and/or Section 51(25) of the Planning Act and registers a Section 118 Restriction on the Logan Lands restricting any transfer or charge of the lands without the consent of the Chief Planner to secure the conditions in Recommendations 3.a, b, c, d, e and f and the implementation of the consent and variances in Recommendation 3.e all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and in consultation with the Chief Planner.

 

h.         Easements for pedestrian access be conveyed to the owners of the properties backing onto the private laneway at 501R Logan Avenue and fronting onto Gerrard Street, such easements to be for a 20-year period over the private laneway on the Logan lands, and be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the City Solicitor.

  

4.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner to issue a Section 111 permit for the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 after all of the following have been satisfied:

 

a.         The Official Plan Amendment has come into full force and effect in a form satisfactory to the Chief Planner.

 

b.         The owner obtains all necessary approvals from the Committee of Adjustment for consent to sever to create the proposed two lots at 467 and 469 Spadina Road and for the associated minor variances to permit the proposed two semi-detached dwellings and that such approvals are to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and the City Solicitor and that such approvals are conditional upon the matters set forth in Recommendation 3.

 

c.         The owner satisfies the conditions in Recommendation 3.a, b, c, d, e, f, g and h.

 

d.         The termination of the condominium in condition 3.b is completed and the resulting parcel of land and related registration for the Logan Lands are all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to renovate and retrofit the interior of an existing 4-storey residential rental building at 467 and 469 Spadina Road, which contained 17 rental apartment units.  In 2006, the previous owner vacated the building and removed the interior demising walls.  The current owner is proposing to undertake substantial renovations to create a pair of semi-detached dwellings within the shell of the existing building.  The 2 resulting semi-detached dwellings will each be ownership in tenure.  To satisfy the City's rental replacement requirements, the owner is providing 8 new larger rental townhouse units on an alternative site at mid-range and affordable rents.

 

This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and recommends that City Council authorize the Chief Planner to issue the Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 pursuant to the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  These approvals would be conditional amongst other matters, on the Official Plan Amendment coming into full force and effect, on the Committee of Adjustment granting the necessary variances and consent to support the creation of a pair of semi-detached dwellings each on their own lot, on the provision of 2 affordable and 6 mid-range townhouse rental replacement units at 501R Logan Avenue, de-registration (termination) of the current plan of condominium from the 501R Logan Avenue property and the entering into and registration of one or more agreements and a Section 118 Restriction to assist with securing the conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 467 and 469 Spadina Road - Official Plan Amendment and Application for Residential Rental Demolition Under Municipal Code Ch. 667 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70048.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Fax from Shelly Kanter and Michael Lewis (TE.Supp.TE33.9.1)

TE33.10 - Final Report - 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan to establish a Site and Area Specific Policy for the lands at 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No.1 to the report (June 9, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to amending Section 1.(a) vii of the draft Official Plan Amendment to read as follows:

                       

"vii.       the combined residential gross floor area and non-residential gross floor area permitted on the Sherbourne Lands shall not exceed 38,000 square metres;"

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 to the report (June 9, 2014), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:

 

A.        Amending Part 6.(n) of Attachment No. 2 to provide that the following parking ratios be provided for the Sherbourne Lands:

 

                            -       0.33 parking spaces per dwelling unit plus 3 car share spaces.

 

B.        Amending Appendix 1 to Attachment No. 2 to provide for the following:

 

1.         Prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for development on the Sherbourne Lands:

 

a.         The owners shall make a cash contribution to the City in the total amount of $300,000.00 to be allocated as follows:

 

i.          $100,000.00 is to be allocated at the discretion of the City for streetscape improvements in the vicinity of the lot in consultation with the local Ward Councillor; and

 

ii.         $200,000.00 is to be allocated to the Affordable Housing Revolving Fund, with the proviso that such funds are to be used to improve the AH Rundle House located on the Selby Lands, if the Selby Lands are conveyed to the City as provided in Section (2).

 

2.         The owners shall also provide the following prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit for development on the Sherbourne Lands:

 

a.         The owners shall convey the Selby Lands to the City on an as is where is basis, for the purposes of residential uses only and subject to and in accordance with the provisions of this Section (2) of this Schedule to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

b.         The City shall provide written notice to owners within 30 days of the issuance of a Foundation Permit for the Sherbourne Lands confirming whether the City wishes to accept the conveyance of the Selby Lands or not, in the City’s sole discretion, and if the City confirms it does not wish to accept such conveyance, the owners shall satisfy its obligation to convey the Selby Lands in its entirety, by paying the sum of $1,600,000.00 (subject to upward indexing calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of such payment) to the City’s capital revolving fund for affordable housing, with the proviso that the funds be spent on affordable housing in Ward 27.

 

c.         All conveyances to the City shall be for nominal consideration, free and clear of encumbrances other than encumbrances acceptable to the City Solicitor and the owners’ right to install tiebacks in the Selby Lands and to have crane swing rights, at no cost to the owners, and in addition the owner shall be responsible to prepare, submit to the City for approval and deposit any required reference plan to describe the lands being conveyed.

 

C.        Deleting the following Section 8.a. of Appendix 1 to Attachment No. 2:

 

"a.        The owner of the Sherbourne Lands shall complete all heritage-related pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control to the satisfaction of the City's Manager, Heritage Preservation Services (the "Manager")."

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the Bills for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to City Council for enactment, the owner shall:

 

i.          Amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 592 Sherbourne Street in accordance with the approved plans and drawings subject to and in accordance with the herein required Conservation Plan, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including registration of such amending agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

ii.         Provide such Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the properties located at 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street, dated June 13, 2012 and revised March 21, 2014, and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iii.        Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 15 Selby Street to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

iv.        Complete and register a Section 37 Agreement (pursuant to the Planning Act) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

v.         Submit to the City a certified cheque in the amount of $4,666.51 based on Functional Servicing Report, prepared by Odan/Detech Group dated May 21, 2014 as Cash-in-Lieu for sanitary sewer upgrades, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

5.         Before introducing the necessary Bills for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into one or more Agreements with the City, satisfactory to the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as follows:

 

The community benefits recommended to be provided by and at the Owner's expense and secured through a Section 37 Agreement are as follows:

 

i.          Prior to the earlier of the issuance of the first above-grade permit for all or any of the Sherbourne Lands, or within 2 years of the execution of the Section 37 agreement, the owner of the Sherbourne Lands and the Selby Lands, at their expense, shall complete the conveyance of the property known municipally as 15 Selby Street and comprising the Selby Lands, to the City at nominal consideration and inclusive of all closing costs, including but not limited to, transfer tax, registration fees, and the costs of obtaining a building condition assessment and cost estimate, satisfactory to the City's Director of the Affordable Housing Office and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for any needed renovations or major repairs to bring the building and/or existing rental units up to industry standards for operation as non-profit affordable rental housing within 120 days of the amending by-laws being in full force and effect, but exclusive of the usual adjustments made on closing, for the purpose of providing at least 5 affordable residential rental dwelling units on such lands to be operated by a non-profit housing provider to be selected by the City and on the following terms:

 

a.         The residential rental units shall be maintained as rental housing in perpetuity.

 

b.         The residential rental units shall provide and maintain affordable rents that are no more than the City's Official Plan definition for Affordable Rental Housing.

 

c.         Rent provisions for maintaining tenancies of the current tenants for as long as they should remain in the existing rental units.

 

d.         Appropriate tenant relocation and assistance, if required for needed renovations or repairs to the building to bring it up to industry standard.

 

ii          A.       Prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit on the Sherbourne Lands:

 

1.         The owners shall make a cash contribution to the City in the total amount of $300,000.00 to be allocated as follows:

 

a.         $100,000.00 is to be allocated at the discretion of the City for streetscape improvements in the vicinity of the lot in consultation with the local Ward Councillor; and

 

b.         $200,000.00 is to be allocated to the Affordable Housing Revolving Fund, with the provision that such funds are to be used to improve the AH Rundle House located on the Selby Lands, if the Selby Lands are conveyed to the City as provided in Section (2).

 

B.        The owner shall within 120 days of enactment of the bills, at its own expense, pay for the City to obtain a building condition assessment for the building on the Selby Lands, in a form and with content satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office.

 

iii.        Prior to the earlier of the issuance of the first above-grade permit for all or any of the Sherbourne Lands, or within 2 years of the execution of the Section 37 agreement, the owner of the Sherbourne Lands and the Selby Lands, at their expense, shall pay to the City a sum satisfactory to the City to be allocated to area park improvements and to local area streetscape improvements in Ward 27.

 

iv.        In the event that the City, in its sole discretion, determines not to accept the conveyance of the property at 15 Selby Street, as outlined above, the Owner shall pay to the City, prior to the earlier of the issuance of the first above-grade permit for all or any of the Sherbourne Lands, or within 2 years of the execution of the Section 37 agreement, by certified cheque a sum satisfactory to the City to be used for the following purposes.

 

a.         to be directed to the City's Capital Revolving Fund for Affordable Housing in Ward 27.

 

b.         to be allocated to area park improvements and to local area streetscape improvements in Ward 27.

 

v.         The payment amounts in Recommendation 5 herein to be increased by upwards indexing in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported by Statistics Canada or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of each such payment to the City.

 

vi.        In the event all or any of the above noted payments in this Appendix 1 have not been used for the intended purpose(s) set out herein within three (3) years of the date of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution(s) may be redirected for other capital improvement purposes at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning (the "Chief Planner"), in consultation with the local Councillor, provided such purpose(s) are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the Sherbourne Lands.

 

vii.       A minimum 10% of the dwelling units in the new development at 592 Sherbourne Street shall be 3 bedroom units.

 

viii.      That prior to Final Site Plan approval for the property at 592 Sherbourne Street:

 

a.         The owner shall provide Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         The related Zoning By-law and Official Plan amendments giving rise to the proposed alterations shall be in full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ix.        That, prior to the issuance of any permit for the property at 592 Sherbourne Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building, the owner shall:

 

a.         Obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendments required for the alterations to the property at 592 Sherbourne Street and to permit the limited office uses at 15 Selby Street, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         Obtain Final Site Plan approval for such property, issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and with content acceptable to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c.         Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

d.         Provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the C. H. Gooderham House will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

e.         Provide an Interpretation Plan for 592 Sherbourne Street, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

f.          Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and the approved Interpretation Plan.

 

x.         That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the owner shall:

 

a.         Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs for the property at 592 Sherbourne Street to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City to enter into an agreement of purchase and sale acceptable to the City Solicitor and Director of Real Estate for the property known as 15 Selby Street with the Owner for the purpose of acquiring the property at nominal cost at the Owner's expense, to either lease or transfer it to a not-for-profit housing provider selected by the City, to be used for the purpose of providing affordable rental housing.

 

7.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner of 15 Selby Street to enter into an agreement of purchase and sale with the City for the sale to it of 15 Selby Street, at nominal cost, with the agreement to include, but not be limited to the following provisions and conditions:

 

a.         the agreement is assignable by the City;

 

b.         the owner providing an up-to-date survey of the property;

 

c.         the closing of the transaction is conditional upon the City obtaining a satisfactory building condition assessment, and to be paid for by the owner;

 

d.         the property is legally zoned for multi-residential use at the time of closing;

 

e.         receipt by the City of the rent roll for the building, satisfactory to it;

 

f.          closing conditional upon the City receiving estoppels certificates from all current tenants of the property, satisfactory to the City;

 

g.         the closing to be at the expense of the owner; and

 

h.         the property is free and clear of encumbrances, to satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

8.         The City Solicitor be authorized to complete the purchase transaction on behalf of the City, establishing and amending the closing date of the agreement of purchase and sale and any other dates to such dates and on such terms and conditions as she may from time to time consider reasonable.

 

9.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to the foregoing, including specific actions set out in Council Authorities to Implement Matters Pursuant to the Section 37 Agreement as Appendix 1 to the report from the Director, Community Planning Toronto and East York District, entitled "592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report" dated May 27, 2014 and the associated "Supplementary Report dated June 9, 2014".

 

10.       City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to undertake a competitive process for the selection of a non-profit rental housing operator for the provision of affordable rental housing within the existing building at 15 Selby Street.

 

11.       City Council authorize the City to enter into a Agreement(s) with a non-profit rental housing operator to be selected by the City for the intended purpose as set out in the report from the Director, Community Planning Toronto and East York District, entitled "592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report" dated May 27, 2014 and the associated "Supplementary Report dated June 9, 2014".

 

12.       City Council authorize and direct the City to enter into the necessary agreement(s) with the approved non-profit rental housing operator for the provision of affordable rental housing within the existing building at 15 Selby Street, as set out in the Section 37 Agreement.

 

13.       City Council direct the Director, Urban Design, City Planning to create a site plan working group in consultation with the Ward Councillor and interested stakeholders.

 

14.       Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, City Council require the owner to submit a Construction Management Plan, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, the General Manager of Transportation Services, and the Chief Building Official, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, and thereafter in support of the development, shall implement the plan during the course of construction. The Construction Management Plan will include, but not limited to, details regarding size and location of construction staging areas, dates of significant concrete pouring activities, measures to ensure safety lighting does not negatively impact adjacent residences, construction vehicle parking locations, refuse storage, site security, site supervisor contact information, and any other matters deemed necessary.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested:

 

1.         The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report directly to City Council, if necessary, on any further modifications to the Section 37 provisions including the payment amounts.

 

2.         The Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to continue to work with the owner to address any remaining outstanding issues and to report any outcomes to the July 8, 2014 meeting of City Council.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law have been submitted to permit a 49-storey residential tower including a 3-storey base building with grade-related townhouse units at 592 Sherbourne Street.  The Gooderham Mansion heritage building at 592 Sherbourne Street would be relocated closer to Sherbourne Street and connect with the proposed residential tower.  Retail space is proposed on the ground floor of the Gooderham Mansion.  The RH Rundle House heritage residential building located at 15 Selby Street would be conserved, however it is requested that offices and multiple residential dwelling units be permitted uses within the existing building.

 

The Official Plan Amendment would establish a Site and Area Specific Policy for the subject lands that would require conservation of the heritage buildings on the lands and also include permission for the proposed residential tower development on the 592 Sherbourne Street lands and limited office uses and multiple residential dwelling units in the heritage residential building located on the 15 Selby Street lands.

 

The Zoning By-law Amendment would establish a Site Specific zoning by law for the 592 Sherbourne Street lands which includes provisions related to: heritage conservation; maximum building height; maximum floor area; minimum building setbacks; maximum number of dwelling units; minimum number of bicycle and vehicle parking spaces; minimum indoor and outdoor amenity space; and permitted uses.  It would also establish site specific zoning for the 15 Selby Street lands, which includes heritage conservation and permission for limited office uses and multiple residential dwelling units within the existing building.

 

A supplementary report will be prepared for City Council's consideration that will include recommendations on the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, along with recommended Section 37 community benefits and facilities for the requested increase in height and density. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70001.pdf

Speakers

Linda A. Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Associations
Brian Bagley
Cynthia MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP
Thomas Kerwin, bKL Architecture LLC

10a - Supplementary Report - 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications

Origin
(June 9, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This is a Supplementary Report to the Final Report that has been prepared by the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District dated May 27, 2014 for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street.  This report includes the recommendations for the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for City's Council's consideration.

 

The applications are to permit a 49-storey (170 metre) residential tower including a 3-storey (11 metre) base building with grade-related townhouse units at 592 Sherbourne Street.  The Gooderham Mansion heritage building at 592 Sherbourne Street would be relocated closer to Sherbourne Street and connect with the proposed residential tower.  Retail space is proposed on the ground floor of the Gooderham Mansion.  The RH Rundle House heritage residential building located at 15 Selby Street would be conserved, however it is requested that offices and multiple residential dwelling units be permitted uses within the existing building.

 

The Official Plan Amendment would establish a Site and Area Specific Policy for the subject lands that would require conservation of the heritage buildings on the lands and also include permission for the proposed residential tower development on the 592 Sherbourne Street lands and limited office uses and multiple residential dwelling units in the heritage residential building located on the 15 Selby Street lands.

 

The Zoning By-law Amendment would establish a Site Specific zoning by law for the 592 Sherbourne Street lands which includes provisions related to: heritage conservation; maximum building height; maximum floor area; minimum building setbacks; maximum number of dwelling units; minimum number of bicycle and vehicle parking spaces; minimum indoor and outdoor amenity space; and permitted uses.  It would also establish site specific zoning for the 15 Selby Street lands, which includes heritage conservation and permission for limited office uses and multiple residential dwelling units within the existing building.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 9, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70675.pdf

TE33.11 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of an Existing Heritage Easement Agreement, Amendment of the Designating By-law for 592 Sherbourne Street, and Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for 15 Selby Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 592 Sherbourne Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction of a maximum 49-storey, and up to a specified height in metres, residential development with retail at grade within the heritage building on the lands known municipally in 2013 as 592 Sherbourne Street, provided the existing building on the 15 Selby Lands (A.H. Rundle House) is retained in situ, conserved, such property is designated, and is subject to a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City, with such alterations to the property at 592 Sherbourne Street to be substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated June 1, 2012 and revised March 20, 2014, prepared by BKL Architecture LLC, date-stamped received by City Planning on April 20, 2014, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA),  prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 13, 2012 and revised March 21, 2014, date-stamped received by City Planning on March 21, 2014, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a.         That the related site specific Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations have been enacted by the City Council and have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         That prior to the introduction of the bills for such Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment by City Council, the owner shall have:

 

i.          Amended the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 592 Sherbourne Street in accordance with the above referenced plans and drawings and subject to and in accordance with the herein required Conservation Plan, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services including registration of such amending agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

ii.         Provided such Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the properties located at 592 Sherbourne Street and 15 Selby Street, dated June 13, 2012 and revised March 21, 2014, and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iii.        Entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 15 Selby Street to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor including registration of such amending agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

iv.        Completed and registered a Section 37 Agreement (pursuant to the Planning Act) to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c.         That prior to Final Site Plan approval for the property at 592 Sherbourne Street: 

 

i.         The owner shall provide Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.        The related Zoning By-law and Official Plan amendments giving rise to the proposed alterations shall be in full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

d.         That prior to the issuance of any permit for the property at 592 Sherbourne Street, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building the owner shall:

 

i.          Obtain final approval for the necessary by-law amendments required for the alterations to the property at 592 Sherbourne Street and to permit the limited office uses at 15 Selby Street, such amendments to have been enacted by City Council and to have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council as determined by the Chief Planner, and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services. 

 

ii.         Have obtained Final Site Plan approval for such property, issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and with content acceptable to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.    

 

iii.        Provide full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iv.        Provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the C. H. Gooderham House will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

v.         Provide an Interpretation Plan for 592 Sherbourne Street, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

vi.        Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Conservation Plan, and the approved Interpretation Plan.

 

e.         That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the owner shall:

 

i.          Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the conservation work and the interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the approved Conservation Plan and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement, registered on title for the heritage property at 592 Sherbourne Street, Instrument No. CA092622, dated May 30, 1990 and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bills in Council to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 592 Sherbourne Street.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of 15 Selby Street in a form and content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and City Solicitor

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 15 Selby Street.

 

6.         City Council state its intention to amend former City of Toronto By-law No. 312-89 to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 592 Sherbourne Street (C. H. Gooderham House) attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (May 16, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, to explain the cultural heritage value or interest of the heritage property and describe its heritage values.

 

7.         If there are no objections to the proposed amendment in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council amending designating By-law No. 312-89.

 

8.         If there are objections to the proposed amendment of former City of Toronto By-law No. 312-89, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board.

 

9.         If the proposed amendment is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to amend the designating by-law.

 

10.       City Council state its intention to designate the property at 15 Selby Street (A. H. Rundle House) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 15 Selby Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (May 16, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

11.       If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property at 15 Selby Street (A.H. Rundle House) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

12.       If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation of 15 Selby Street to the Conservation Review Board.

 

13.       If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property at 15 Selby Street.

Origin

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described in this report for the heritage properties located at 592 Sherbourne Street (The C. H. Gooderham House) and 15 Selby Street (A.H. Rundle House) in connection with the proposed  redevelopment of 592 Sherbourne Street for a residential tower development of 49 stories and a specified height in metres which would include the incorporation of the C.H. Gooderham House into the development and to add permission for limited office uses for the 15 Selby Street property, provided the existing building (A.H. Rundle House) is retained, conserved, designated, and is the subject of a Heritage Easement Agreement.  Should Council endorse this strategy staff recommend that the existing Heritage Easement Agreement and designating By-law for 592 Sherbourne Street be amended, and that Council state its intention to designate 15 Selby Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and require the owner of 15 Selby Street to enter into and register a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City and  authorize staff to take the necessary steps to enter into such Heritage Easement Agreement, to ensure the  long-term protection for 15 Selby Street.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of an Existing Heritage Easement Agreement, Amendment of the Designating By-law for 592 Sherbourne Street, and Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for 15 Selby Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69518.pdf

Speakers

Linda A. Brett, President, Bloor Street East Neighbourhood Associations
Brian Bagley
Cynthia MacDougall, McCarthy Tetrault LLP
Thomas Kerwin, kLC Architecture LLC

11a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of an Existing Heritage Easement Agreement, Amendment of the Designating By-law for 592 Sherbourne Street, and Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for 15 Selby Street

Origin
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 5, 2014, considered a report (May 16, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of an Existing Heritage Easement Agreement, Amendment of the Designating By-law for 592 Sherbourne Street, and Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for 15 Selby Street.

 

Andrew Pruss, Planner, ERA Architects Inc., addressed the Toronto Preservation Board.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of an Existing Heritage Easement Agreement, Amendment of the Designating By-law for 592 Sherbourne Street, and Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for 15 Selby Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70350.pdf

TE33.12 - Final Report - 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Site Specific Zoning By-law 705-2006, for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Prior to the introduction of Bills to Council, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to amend the Section 37 Agreement dated August 3, 2006 between the City and the original owner of the property as contemplated in the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

At the May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to site specific By-law No. 706-2006 respecting 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue to reallocate the funds previously secured for local park improvements towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School.  In addition, any of the funds previously allocated towards specific projects that had not been spent, including accrued interest, were to be reallocated to alternative community benefits including: local park improvements; streetscape improvements; community facility improvement; public art; community gardens; pedestrian and cycling facilities; and heritage related improvements.  Council directed that in the reallocation, consideration be given to current community needs and to co-ordination of these community benefits with funds that have been secured through other Section 37 Agreements which affect the local area.  Staff were also to co-ordinate amendments to the applicable Section 37 Agreement with the current owner of the subject lands.

 

This report recommends approval of a Zoning By-law Amendment providing for the reallocation as described above. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70014.pdf

TE33.13 - Final Report - 319 Carlaw Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bill 695 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Site Specific Zoning By-law 413-2009 (OMB), for the lands known as 319 Carlaw Avenue, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Prior to the introduction of Bills to Council, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to amend the Section 37 Agreement dated January 26, 2009 between the City and the original owner of the property as contemplated in the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

At its May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to By-law No. 413-2009 (OMB) respecting 319 Carlaw Avenue to reallocate part of the funds previously secured for park bench beautification towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School.  In addition, consideration was to be given to reallocation of the funds previously allocated toward specific projects that had not been spent, together with accrued interest, toward current community needs and to co-ordinate with funds that have been secured through other Section 37 Agreements which affect the local area.  Staff were also to co-ordinate amendments to the applicable Section 37 Agreement with the current owner of the subject lands.

 

This report recommends approval of a Zoning By-law Amendment providing for the reallocation of Section 37 funds as contemplated by Council.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 319 Carlaw Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70035.pdf

TE33.14 - Final Report - Queen Street East / Leslieville Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment, Urban Design Guidelines and Heritage Inventory

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bill 652 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands fronting on Queen Street East between the railway crossing at Jimmie Simpson Park and Leslie Street substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 4 to the report (May 27, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council adopt the Urban Design Guidelines attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (May 27, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning; the General Manager of Transportation Services; and the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture to have discussions with the Leslieville Business Improvement Area regarding streetscaping opportunities within the study area.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

In June 2013, City Council directed City Planning staff to initiate a study of Queen Street East between the railway crossing at Jimmie Simpson Park and Leslie Street.  This report summarizes the outcome of the Queen Street East/Leslieville Planning Study; provides a draft City-initiated Official Plan Amendment for the study area; and brings forward recommended area-specific Urban Design Guidelines.

 

The area-specific Official Plan policy would reinforce existing permissions, while providing more emphasis on the diverse character of the street, heritage, and transition to adjacent residential uses.  This report recommends a maximum streetwall height of 14 metres (four storeys) with stepbacks required above a height of 14 metres.  The maximum recommended height is 20 metres (six storeys).

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the City-initiated Official Plan Amendment to create Area-Specific Official Plan policy No. 469 (refer to Attachment No. 4) and the Urban Design Guidelines (refer to Attachment No. 5).

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Queen Street East/Leslieville Planning Study - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment, Urban Design Guidelines and Heritage Inventory - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70046.pdf
Attachment 5 - Leslieville Urban Design Guidelines - Queen Street East: Railway Crossing at Jimmie Simpson Park to Leslie Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70398.pdf

Speakers

Matthew Hill
Paul Dowsett, Sustainable T.O.
John Cameron

Communications (Community Council)

(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Brian Graff (TE.Supp.TE33.14.1)
(June 16, 2014) Letter from Robert A. Dragicevic, Walker, Nott, Dragicevic Associates Limited (TE.Supp.TE33.14.2)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Matthew Hill (TE.Supp.TE33.14.3)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Garth Norbraten (TE.Supp.TE33.14.4)
(June 16, 2014) Letter from Johanna R. Shapira, Wood Bull LLP (TE.Supp.TE33.14.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48140.pdf
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Shiralee Hudson (TE.Supp.TE33.14.6)

TE33.15 - Final Report - 2359 Danforth Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Communication TE33.15.7 has been submitted on this Item

Bills 689 and 690 have been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 2359 Danforth Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, for the lands at 2359 Danforth Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to report (May 30, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into one or more Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following at the owner's sole expense all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of Planning in consultation with appropriate civic officials and the Ward Councillor:

 

Prior to the issuance of above grade permits unless indicated otherwise provide a cash contribution of $230,000 which is to be used for the following:

 

i.          $150,000 to be deposited with the City for a Public Art Program, administered by the City's Culture Division, in the vicinity of the development site; and

 

ii.         $80,000 towards improvements to Stephenson Park.

 

iii.        In the event the cash contributions referred to in Section i and ii above has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of this By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, in consultation with the local Councillor, provided that the purpose is identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the lands.

 

5.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to continue working with the applicant through the site plan process to include greater horizontal and vertical articulation and use of material to achieve a stronger pedestrian-oriented street environment.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council on August 12, 2014 on the realignment of Permit Parking Area 9A and the exclusion of the property located at 2359 Danforth Avenue.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a 10-storey mixed-use building with retail space at grade and 136 residential units at 2359 Danforth Avenue.

 

The City Planning Division is recommending approval of the proposed development based on its location on an Avenue and on its planning and design attributes:

 

a.         the proposed development provides a transition in scale and density as it steps down from the Danforth Avenue mixed use corridor to the low density neighbourhood;

 

b.         the proposed development achieves the City's public realm objectives, including desired sidewalk width and adequate sunlight at pedestrian level on Danforth Avenue;

 

c.         the applicant’s Avenue Segment Review (as adopted by staff) indicates that incremental redevelopments of the same general scale within the identified Avenue Segment will not negatively impact the adjacent neighbourhoods;

 

d.         the site is in close proximity to both Woodbine and Main subway stations and the Danforth GO Station and has excellent transit connections to most points within the City;

 

e.         the site is on Danforth Avenue with close proximity to retail, service and entertainment facilities and places of employment; and

 

f.          the Section 37 benefits that would be secured as a result of approval and construction of this development including contributions towards public art and a local park in the vicinity of the proposed development.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 2359 Danforth Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69954.pdf

Speakers

Donna Braniff, Danforth East Association of Ratepayers
Kim Hayward
Angelo Kamaratakis
Steve Wickens, DECA Board Member
Mary Fiedler
Loretta Guran
Andrew Ferancik, WND Associates

Communications (Community Council)

(June 3, 2014) Letter from Mary Fiedler (TE.Supp.TE33.15.1)
(May 29, 2014) E-mail from Kim Hayward, submitting a form letter signed by approximately 54 individuals (TE.Supp.TE33.15.2)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Brian Graff (TE.Supp.TE33.15.3)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Andrea Steinberg and Michael Whitman (TE.Supp.TE33.15.4)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Elizabeth Forestell (TE.Supp.TE33.15.5)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from Diane Findlay (TE.Supp.TE33.15.6)

Communications (City Council)

(June 19, 2014) Letter from Danette Murphy and Dr. Lisa Marshall (CC.Supp.TE33.15.7)

TE33.16 - Final Report - Queen Street East Visioning Study (Coxwell Avenue to Nursewood Road) - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
The Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planner has submitted a report on this Item (TE33.16a with recommendations)

Communication TE33.16.2 has been submitted on this Item

Bill 708 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 1614 to 1702, 1824 to 2362, 1525 to 1535, 1595 to 1661, 1733 to 1989 and 2163 to 2505 Queen Street East and 1 Kingston Road, substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to report (May 27, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on June 17, 2014, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

In February 2014, City Council directed City Planning staff to report back on the merits of a site and area specific policy for Queen Street East between Coxwell Avenue and Nursewood Avenue, and to recommend an Official Plan Amendment, if appropriate.  This report reviews and recommends approval of a City-initiated Official Plan Amendment with the creation of Area Specific Official Plan Policy No. 466.

 

This City-initiated Official Plan Amendment proposes the introduction of an Area Specific Official Plan Amendment for the lands at 1614 to 1702, 1824 to 2362, 1525 to 1535, 1595 to 1661, 1733 to 1989 and 2163 to 2505 Queen Street East and 1 Kingston Road.  The area-specific policy would reinforce the existing development permissions for the area and provide guidance for future development to achieve compatibility with the existing character of the area.

 

In addition, at its meeting of November 27, 2012, City Council adopted a motion requesting four City Divisions (Economic Development, Culture and Tourism, Transportation Services, the Toronto Parking Authority and Toronto Water) to report back to Toronto and East York Community Council on specific issues relating to this portion of Queen Street East.  The responses have been included in the body of this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Queen Street East Visioning Study (Coxwell Avenue to Nursewood Road) - City-Initiated Official Plan Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69696.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(July 3, 2014) Supplementary report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Queen Street East Visioning Study (Coxwell Avenue to Nursewood Road) - City Initiated Official Plan Amendment (TE33.16a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71352.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Brian Graff (TE.Supp.TE33.16.1)

Communications (City Council)

(July 7, 2014) Letter from Jan Hykamp, President, The Greater Beach Neighbourhood Association (CC.New.TE33.16.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48666.pdf

TE33.17 - Request for Direction - 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Boarding hearing as necessary in support of the recommendations for the property at 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street and substantially in accordance with the plans by Hariri Pontarini Architects, submitted to City Planning and date stamped March 14, 2014 and with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment (Attachment 1) and as further detailed in the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council support the draft Zoning By-law Amendment contained in Attachment 7 to the report (May 29, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, which implements this direction before the Ontario Municipal Board subject to amending part 5k) of the Draft Zoning By-law to read as follows:

 

5 k)      a minimum of 192 parking spaces shall be provided and maintained on the site in a parking garage in accordance with the following minimum requirements:

 

(i)         0.39 parking spaces for each dwelling unit for the use of the residents of the mixed-use building;

 

(ii)        5 parking spaces for the exclusive use of residential visitors to the dwelling units of the mixed-use building to be painted and signed to indicate they are for the exclusive use of the residential visitors;

 

(iii)       21 parking spaces for the shared use of visitors to the dwelling units and occupants of and visitors to the non-residential uses on the site; and

 

(iv)       Notwithstanding 12(2)(132) the parking spaces required by subsection 5 k)(iii) above may be provided as an accessory use in a commercial parking garage on the site.

   

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to continue to work with the applicant on the final form of the draft Zoning By-law Amendment to be presented to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

4.         City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its final order until the owner revises the Site Servicing Assessment and the Downstream Sanitary/Combined & Storm Sewer Analysis prepared by GHD Group to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering & Construction Services; and require the owner to pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure should the Site Servicing Assessment and the Downstream Sanitary/Combined & Storm Sewer Analysis as accepted by the Executive Director, Engineering & Construction Services show that upgrades are required to support this development to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services.

 

5.         City Council instruct the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its final order for the lands at 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street until the Owner enters into one or more Agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to secure the following at the owner's sole expense all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with appropriate civic officials and the Ward Councillor:

 

i.          Enter into an agreement at the expense of the owner the following as Section 37 facilities, services and matters:

 

a.         Design and construct local park improvements in James Canning Park and in the immediate area to a maximum value of $1,200,000 secured through a Letter of Credit to the satisfaction of the City and in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

i.          Prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the Owner shall submit a cost estimate and all the necessary plans for the park improvement to be approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

ii.         Prior to issuance of the first above-grade building permit, the Owner shall post an irrevocable Letter of Credit in the amount of 120% of the value of the approved estimate to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

 

iii.        Occupation of the existing parkland is prohibited unless a Park Occupation Permit (POP) has been obtained from Parks, Forestry and Recreations' Planning, Design and Development section. The POP, if approved, will outline in detail the insurance requirements, extent of area permitted, permitted use, tree removal and replacement, duration, restoration plan and costs, and compensation to the satisfaction of the General Manager, PFR. The POP must be secured prior to the issuance of any shoring and excavation permits. The owner will indemnify the City against any claim during any interim use of or work carried out by the applicant on the park.

 

iv.        The construction of the Park Improvements shall be completed within two years after the date of issuance of the first above grade building permit to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. Unforeseen delays (e.g., weather) resulting in the late delivery of the Park Improvements shall be taken into consideration and at the discretion of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation when determining a revised delivery date for the Park Improvements.

 

v.         The Owner, upon satisfactory completion of the construction and installation of the Park Improvements shall be required to guarantee such work and associated materials. The Owner shall provide certification from their Landscape Architect certifying that all work has been completed in accordance with the approved drawings. Upon the City’s acceptance of the certificate, the Letter of Credit(s) will be released less 20% which will be retained for the 2 year guarantee - Parkland Warranty Period.

 

vi.        Upon the expiry of the Parkland Warranty Period, the outstanding park security shall be released to the owner provided that:

 

a.         There are no outstanding claims against the remaining park security.

 

b.         No liens have been registered against the parkland.

 

c.         The owner has provided the City with written confirmation that is has not received notice of any claim for lien affecting the parkland.

 

iv.        All deficiencies have been rectified.

 

v.         The owner has provided to the City the certificate of the parkland Landscape Architect providing evidence that all lien periods under the Construction Lien Act affecting the parkland have expired.

 

vii.       As-built drawings in print/hardcopy and electronic format shall be submitted to Parks, Forestry and Recreation. A complete set of “as built” plans shall be provided electronically on CD in the latest version of AutoCAD, two (2) sets full size bond hard copy and one (1) set 11X 17 format to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The plans shall include, but not limited to specifications, locations of all hidden services, and all deviations from the design drawings, shop drawings, inspection reports, minutes of meeting, site instructions, change orders, invoices, certificates, progress images, warrantees, close out documentation, compliance letters (for any play structures and safety surfaces), manuals etc. The files are to be organized in folders, including a file index and submitted. Written warranties and related documents such as lists of contractor, sub-contractors together with contact persons, telephone numbers, warranty expiry dates and operating manuals.

 

b.         $500,000 to be paid by the owner prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit towards public art in accordance with the Percent for Public Art Program which may used within the public plaza at the north end of the site.

 

c.         $1,500,000 to be paid by the owner prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit towards the Toronto Community Housing Corporation for capital improvements and/or community, cultural or recreational space improvements in the local area.

 

d.         The payment amounts identified in Parts a, b and c above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported by statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment of the funds by the owner to the City.

 

ii.         The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director of Planning in consultation with the appropriate civic officials and the Ward Councillor:

 

a.         The owner agrees to provide and design at the expense of the owner, a privately owned, publically accessible pedestrian plaza at the north end of the site with a minimum depth of 10 metres at grade to a height of 6 metres and minimum depth of 7 metres above 6 metres and a minimum width of 23.2 metres and minimum area of 245 square metres with final design and access to be secured through the site plan approval process and which may contain public art and patio space for the adjoining retail uses as shown on the plans by Hariri Pontarini date stamped March 14, 2014 by City Planning.

 

b.         As a condition of site plan approval and prior to the occupancy of the building, the owner shall convey to the City an easement(s) for 24-hour public access to the pedestrian plaza as identified in 5.b.i, (the “City Easements”), for nominal consideration and to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, and shall maintain these areas free and clear of encumbrances for pedestrian use, in perpetuity, and shall pay all costs associated with the preparation and registration of all necessary documents and plans, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

c.         The wind mitigation measures listed in the submitted Wind Study shall be implemented to ensure that the wind effects are acceptable.

 

d.         At least 10% of the total number of dwelling units to be constructed on the lot shall contain family sized units of two bedroom plus den and three or more bedrooms in compliance with the provisions of the Ontario Building Code.

 

e.         Require the owner to provide a setback along the Yonge Street frontage of a minimum width of 3 metres at the north end of the site and 2.8 metres at the south end of the site except in the location of the character building as described in Recommendation 6.b.vii. and to design and construct an upgraded streetscape for Yonge Street, Gloucester Street and Dundonald Street along the frontage of the site including upgraded pavement treatment and landscaping in accordance with Vibrant Streets Design Guidelines to be secured through the site plan process.

 

f.          Require the owner to design and construct an upgraded architectural façade treatment for the base and the tower, including pedestrian weather protection along each frontage of the site all in accordance with the North Downtown Yonge Street Urban Design Guidelines.

 

g.         Require the owner to retain the south and west facades of the character building known as 587 Yonge Street and located at the southwest corner of the site (north east corner of Yonge Street and Dundonald Street) and incorporate these facades into the final design of the base of the building or to replace the building with a three storey brick feature in keeping with the built form and character of the south and west facades of the existing building known as 587 Yonge Street substantially in accordance with the architectural drawings submitted by Hariri Pontarini date stamped by City Planning March 14, 2014 and to be further refined through the site plan approval process.

 

h.         Submit a monitoring protocol and demolition plan to be completed by the consultant archaeologist for the demolition of the Yonge Street structures to ensure that the archaeological resources are not impacted during the demolition process.

 

i.          All archaeological requirements for Stage 2-3 archaeological assessment as well as the provision for any additional Stage 4 archaeological assessment is to be fully secured as follows:

 

i.          As a pre-approval condition of a site plan application for the subject properties, the owner will retain a consultant licensed by the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Sport under the provisions of the Ontario Heritage Act (R.S.O 1990 as amended) to carry out a Stage 2 - 3 archaeological resource assessment of the subject property and follow through on recommendations to mitigate, through preservation or resource removal and documentation, adverse impacts to any significant archaeological resources found. (i.e., Stage 4).

 

ii.         The assessment is to be completed in accordance with the 2011 Standards and Guidelines for Consulting Archaeologists, Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Sport. Should the archaeological assessment process continue beyond a Stage 2 -3 assessment, any recommendations for Stage 4 mitigation strategies must be reviewed and approved by Heritage Preservation Services prior to commencement of the site mitigation.

 

iii.        The owner will submit a copy of the relevant assessment report(s) to the Heritage Preservation Services Unit in both hard copy format and as an Acrobat PDF file on compact disk.

 

iv.        The owner will incorporate significant archaeological resources and findings into the proposed development through either in-situ preservation and interpretation where feasible, or commemorate and interpret the resources through exhibition development on site including, but not limited to, commemorative plaquing.

 

v.         The owner will ensure no construction, grading or other soil disturbances shall take place on the subject property prior to the City’s Planning Division (Heritage Preservation Services Unit) and the Ministry of Culture and Tourism (Heritage Operations Unit) confirming in writing that all archaeological licensing and technical review requirements have been satisfied.

 

j.          Apply for and complete the approval process to seek permission to remove City street trees and trees from a City park as protected under the City of Toronto's Street Tree By-law and the City of Toronto Park's By-law.

 

k.         The owner shall agree to not object to the heritage designation of the property at 7-9 Gloucester Street.

 

l.          As a condition of site plan approval and prior to the issuance of any permits, require a detailed construction management plan for the site.

 

m.        The owner shall agree to withdraw their appeal to Ontario Municipal Board of OPA 183, the North Downtown Yonge Area Specific Policy 382 once the Ontario Municipal Board issues their decision on the appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands at 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street.

Origin

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The applicant has appealed a Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  A pre-hearing has been scheduled for July 21st, 2014.  The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction with respect to the position of the City at the Ontario Municipal Board pre-hearing including instructions regarding the applicant's revised submission.

 

In their most recent submission, date stamped March 14, 2014 by City Planning, the applicant proposes to redevelop the site with a 44-storey residential tower (148 metres including mechanical penthouse) on a 4-storey base containing retail commercial uses with 420 residential condominium units.  There are four levels of below-grade parking proposed with 192 spaces and access from Gloucester Street on the north side of the site.  The proposed zoning by-law amendment includes the provision of facilities, services and matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as detailed in the report and recommendations, and to be further secured in a Section 37 Agreement to be satisfactorily entered into and registered prior to the issuance of the Board Order.

 

It is staff's opinion that the most recent submission date stamped March 14, 2014 by City Planning is appropriate.  Staff is recommending that the revised application be supported, subject to the conditions in the recommendations section of this report.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69958.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(March 29, 2013) E-mail from E. Linden, 1734141 Ontario Inc. (TE.Supp.TE33.17.1)
(June 16, 2014) Letter from Rick Whitten-Stovall, President, Bay Cloverhill Community Association (TE.Supp.TE33.17.2)

17a - Supplementary Report - 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Origin
(June 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

This report provides revised recommendations to clarify the wording for two of the Section 37 requirements for consideration for item TE33.17, 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction dated May 29, 2014, Toronto and East York Community Council Agenda.  The applicant has appealed a Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  A pre-hearing has been scheduled for July 21, 2014.  Item TE33.17 seeks City Council's direction with respect to the position of the City at the Ontario Municipal Board pre-hearing including instructions regarding the applicant's revised submission for the rezoning application.  The proposed development includes a 44-storey residential tower (148 metres including mechanical penthouse) on a 4-storey base containing retail commercial uses with 420 residential condominium units.  There are four levels of below-grade parking proposed with 192 spaces and access from Gloucester Street on the north side of the site.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 11, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 587 to 599 Yonge Street, 2 to 4 Dundonald Street, 7 to 9 Gloucester Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70522.pdf

TE33.19 - Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Request for Directions Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and pertains to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City

Community Council Recommendations

The City Planning Division and the City Solicitor recommend that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 2 of the report (June 9, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the City Solicitor, respecting the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Request for Directions.

 

2.         If adopted, the Recommendations in Attachment 2 of the report (June 9, 2014) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and the City Solicitor and associated maps be released when settlement is achieved, with the balance of Attachment 2 to remain confidential.

Origin

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and City Solicitor

Summary

The City of Toronto passed the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan (CWSP) in April 2003 and subsequently zoning by-laws for East Bayfront (By-law No. 1049-2006) and North Keating (By-law No. 1174-2010).  Owners of six of the private development sites in the two precincts have filed appeals to the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan and the area specific By-laws.  After several years of discussions and several pre-hearing conferences, the Ontario Municipal Board has set time for hearings on four of these appeals starting November 17, 2014, for a period of four weeks, and a further period of six weeks commencing January 5, 2015.  City and Waterfront Toronto representatives have conducted lengthy ongoing negotiations with the appellants in an effort to find mutually acceptable solutions for both the appellants and the City.  In a report adopted by Council on May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 the City provided authority to allow for the settlement of appeals on 3 sites at Lower Jarvis Street and Queens Quay East.

 

This report outlines the nature of the second round of proposed settlement discussions and seeks City Council authority to settle the appeals based on the conclusions and recommendations set out in the Confidential Attachment.

 

This negotiation process has been an exceptionally labour intensive exercise, but has resulted in the Ontario Municipal Board approving the most recent settlements on June 2, 2014.  This report outlines the overall issues and requests in a confidential attachment, direction from Council to resolve the remaining appeals within the East Bayfront and Keating Precincts at the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 9, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District and City Solicitor - Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Request for Directions Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70426.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Central Waterfront Secondary Plan - Request for Directions Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69847.pdf

TE33.20 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-law and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Spadina Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 1 Spadina Crescent, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with such alterations to the property at 1 Spadina Crescent to be substantially in accordance with the drawings prepared by Adamson Associates Architects, dated November 19, 2013 and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA),  prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated November 19, 2013 and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a.         Prior to final site plan approval, the owner shall:

 

i.          Provide a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the property located at 1 Spadina Crescent, dated November 19, 2013, and all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         Provide Final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iii.        Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the property at 1 Spadina Crescent to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor.

 

b.         Prior to the issuance of any permit for the property at 1 Spadina Crescent, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs, maintenance or restoration of the existing heritage building, the owner shall:

 

i.          Provide complete drawings illustrating the conservation and protective measures to be undertaken in both phases of the project, including notes and specifications keyed to the approved Conservation Plan, and a description of materials and finishes. These drawings are to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         Provide a Lighting Plan that describes how the former Knox College will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iii.        Provide an Interpretation Plan for 1 Spadina Crescent, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iv.        Provide a Letter of Credit, including provision for upwards indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Interpretation Plan.

 

c.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the owner shall provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the interpretive work has been completed in accordance with the approved Interpretation Plan, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council state its intention to amend former City of Toronto By-law No. 89-76 to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 1 Spadina Crescent (Knox College) attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division to explain the cultural heritage value or interest of the property and describe its heritage attributes.

 

3.         If there are no objections to the proposed amendment in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council amending designating By-law No. 89-76.

 

4.         If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board.

 

5.         If the proposed amendment is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision to amend the designating by-law.

 

6.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owners of the property at 1 Spadina Crescent (Knox College).

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of a Heritage Easement Agreement for the property at 1 Spadina Crescent (Knox College).

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alteration of 1 Spadina Crescent.  Located at the top of Spadina Avenue in the centre of Spadina Crescent just north of College Street, the property contains the former three-storey Knox College which was built in 1875 and designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act on March 17, 1976.

 

The property is the subject of a site plan application that proposes interior renovation and exterior restoration of the existing building, the removal of a number of rear additions and a new three-storey rear addition. The designated building and the new addition will be home to the University of Toronto's Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape and Design (DFALD).

 

This report also recommends that City Council amend former City of Toronto By-law 89-76, designating the property at 1 Spadina Crescent (former Knox College, Spadina Military Hospital and Toronto Connaught Laboratories) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 changes to the Ontario Heritage Act, and to grant authority for a heritage easement agreement.  When a heritage easement agreement is secured for a property designated prior to 2005 it is the City's practice to amend the designating by-law to describe the cultural heritage values and attributes of the property as set out in the 2005 amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-law and Authority for Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Spadina Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69672.pdf

20a - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-law and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Spadina Crescent

Origin
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 5, 2014, considered a report (May 26, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-law and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement – 1 Spadina Crescent.

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

Andrew Pruss, Planner, ERA Architects Inc.

Claudina Sula, Partner, Adamson Associates

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property, Amendment of Designating By-law and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 1 Spadina Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70349.pdf

TE33.21 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 33 Avenue Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 33 Avenue Road (York Square) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 33 Avenue Road (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (January 6, 2014) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

2.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

 

5.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to establish a Working Group Process in consultation with the Ward Councillor, composed of community stakeholders, specifically to reach a consensus on a preferred development option which respects the heritage attributes and values of the site in accordance with the Statement of Significance contained in the Staff Report (January 6, 2014) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, entitled “Intention to Designate under Part IV Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 33 Avenue Road" and report back on the findings and outcomes to the Toronto and East York Community Council in the first half of 2015.

Origin

(January 6, 2014) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 33 Avenue Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value.  Located on the north east corner of Avenue Road and Yorkville Avenue, the property contains the building historically known as York Square (1968-9).  An application has been made to redevelop the property which would result in the demolition of the building complex.  To refuse demolition, City Council must state its intention to designate the property at 33 Avenue Road under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 6, 2014) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 33 Avenue Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68436.pdf

Speakers

Linda R. Lewis
Craig Hunter, Hunter and Associates Ltd.
Catherine Nasmith, Toronto Architectural Conservancy

Communications (Community Council)

(January 24, 2014) Letter from Linda Chu, Director, ABC Residents' Association (TE.Main.TE33.21.1)
(April 2, 2014) E-mail from Gee Chung, President, The Greater Yorkville Residents' Association (TE.Main.TE33.21.2)
(April 2, 2014) E-mail from Ron Palmer, PPUD Committee Chair, Bloor-Yorkville BIA (TE.Main.TE33.21.3)
(April 2, 2014) Letter from Linda Chu, ABC Residents' Association (TE.Main.TE33.21.4)
(April 3, 2014) Letter from Stephen Armstrong, Armstrong Planning & Project Management (TE.Main.TE33.21.5)
(April 4, 2014) Letter from Ian Wookey, President, Seniority Investments Ltd. (TE.Main.TE33.21.6)
(April 7, 2014) Letter from Jodi Shpigel, Vice President, First Capital (Ontario) Holdings Corporation (TE.Main.TE33.21.7)
(June 11, 2014) Letter from Ian Wookey, Seniority Investments Limited (TE.Supp.TE33.21.8)
(June 13, 2014) Letter from Stephen Armstrong, Armstrong Planning & Project Management (TE.Supp.TE33.21.9)
(June 13, 2014) Letter from Dori J. Segal, President and CEO, First Capital and Daniel Guizzetti, President and CEO, Empire Communities (Yorkville) Ltd. (TE.Supp.TE33.21.10)

21a - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 33 Avenue Road

Origin
(January 29, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on January 28, 2014, considered the following:

 

1.         Report (January 6, 2014) from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 33 Avenue Road.

 

2.         Communications:

Letter (December 4, 2013) from Linda Chu, Director, ABC Residents' Association

(PB.Supp.PB28.4.1)

Letter (January 24, 2014) from Linda Chu, Director, ABC Residents' Association (PB.Supp.PB28.4.2)

E-mail (January 27, 2014) from Ron Palmer, Chair, Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area (PB.Supp.PB28.4.3)

E-mail (January 27, 2014) from David Harrison, Chair, Annex Residents' Association

(PB.Supp.PB28.4.4)

 

Stephen Armstrong, Empire Consultants, addressed the Toronto Preservation Board.

Background Information (Community Council)
(January 29, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 33 Avenue Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-68438.pdf

21b - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 33 Avenue Road

Origin
(March 31, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on March 26, 2014, considered the following:

 

1.         (January 6, 2014) Report from the Acting Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, respecting Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act – 33 Avenue Road

 

2.         (December 4, 2013) Letter from Linda Chu, Director, ABC Residents' Association (PB29.9.1)

 

3.         (January 24, 2014) Letter from Linda Chu, Director, ABC Residents' Association (PB29.9.2)

 

4.         (January 27, 2014) E-mail from Ron Palmer, Chair, Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area (PB29.9.3)

 

5.         (January 27, 2014) E-mail from David Harrison, Chair, Annex Residents' Association (PB29.9.4)

 

6.         (March 25, 2014) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (PB29.9.5)

 

7.         (March 26, 2014) Letter from Linda Chu forwarding a letter from Armstrong Planning & Project Management (PB29.9.6)

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

Stephen Armstrong, Empire Communities

Linda R. Lewis

Linda Chu, Director, ABC Residents' Association

Background Information (Community Council)
(March 31, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 33 Avenue Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70123.pdf

TE33.22 - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property 68-70 Shuter Street and Demolition of a Listed Heritage Property 64-66 Shuter Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the request to demolish the heritage building at 68-70 Shuter Street in accordance with Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act as proposed in Site Plan Application No. 14 107073 SA substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Statement for the subject property at 68-70 Shuter Street prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Limited Architects dated May 6, 2014 and date stamped received by City Planning on May 14, 2014, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         Prior to Site Plan Approval the owner shall complete all pre-approval conditions contained in a Notice of Approval Conditions for Site Plan Control.

 

b.         Prior to the issuance of any permit under the Ontario Heritage Act for the proposed development the owner shall:

 

i.          Have executed and registered a Site Plan Agreement for the development to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or her designate.

 

ii.         Provide a Reconstruction Plan prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that is consistent with the strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for 68-70 Shuter Street prepared by Goldsmith Borgal and Company Limited Architects, dated May 6, 2014, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services that describes how the south elevation will be an exact reconstruction.

 

iii.        Provide final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to the approved Reconstruction Pan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iv.        Submit a Lighting Plan that describes how the reconstructed heritage elevation will be sensitively illuminated to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

v.         Provide full building permit drawings for the proposed development, including notes and specifications for the protective measures and reconstruction work keyed to the approved Reconstruction Plan, including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

vi.        Provide a Commemoration Plan that fully communicates the heritage values and heritage context of the Gillespie Houses and Edward Cooper Houses to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

vii.       Provide a Letter of Credit, indexed annually, in a form and amount satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to secure all work included in the approved Reconstruction Plan and the approved Commemoration Plan.

 

viii.      Provide full documentation of the existing heritage properties at 64-66 Shuter Street, and at 68-70 Shuter Street, including two (2) printed sets of archival quality 8” x 10” colour photographs with borders in a glossy or semi-gloss finish and one (1) digital set on a CD in tiff format keyed to a location map, elevations and measured drawings, and copies of all existing interior floor plans and original drawings as may be available, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c.         Prior to the release of the Letter of Credit the owner provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that all of the reconstruction and commemoration work has been completed in accordance with the Reconstruction Plan and the Commemoration Plan all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and the appropriate staff to introduce the necessary bill in Council repealing the designation of the property at 68-70 Shuter Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, as required by Section 34 (3) of the Ontario Heritage Act, following the demolition of the heritage property.

Origin

(May 12, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council endorse the conservation strategy generally described for the heritage properties located at 64-70 Shuter Street to allow for the construction of a twenty-four storey condominium with retail uses a grade.  Staff have determined that the property at 64-66 Shuter Street does not meet the Provincial criteria for designation so staff do not oppose its demolition.  The front elevation at 68-70 Shuter Street has severely deteriorated and it cannot be incorporated into the proposed development without first being disassembled.  Should Council endorse this strategy the front elevation, chimneys, and portions of the roof and a return wall will be reconstructed and incorporated into the new base building of the residential tower.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 12, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property 68-70 Shuter Street and Demolition of a Listed Heritage Property 64-66 Shuter Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69517.pdf

22a - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property 68-70 Shuter Street and Demolition of a LIsted Heritage Property 64-66 Shuter Street

Origin
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 5, 2014, considered a report (May 12, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property 68-70 Shuter Street and Demolition of a Listed Heritage Property 64-66 Shuter Street.

 

Chris Borgal addressed the Toronto Preservation Board.

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Demolition of a Designated Heritage Property 68-70 Shuter Street and Demolition of a Listed Heritage Property 64-66 Shuter Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70353.pdf

TE33.23 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 704 Queen Street East (Entrance Address 106 Broadview Avenue)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 704 Queen Street East (Dingman's Hall) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 704 Queen Street East (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (May 16, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

2.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the property.

Origin

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 704 Queen Street East, entrance address 106 Broadview Avenue, (Dingman's Hall) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for its cultural heritage value.  Located at the north-west corner of Queen Street East and Broadview Avenue, Dingman's Hall (now known as Jilly's and the New Broadview Hotel) is a four storey building completed in 1891-2.  The property was listed on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties in 1975.

 

Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the property at 704 Queen Street East meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation under the Ontario Heritage Act.  The designation of the property would identify the property's heritage values and attributes and enable City Council to control alterations to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 704 Queen Street East (Entrance Address 106 Broadview Avenue)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69516.pdf

23a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 704 Queen Street East (Entrance Address 106 Broadview Avenue)

Origin
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on June 5, 2014, considered a report (May 16, 2014) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, regarding Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act – 704 Queen Street East (Entrance Address 106 Broadview Avenue).

Background Information (Community Council)
(June 6, 2014) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 704 Queen Street East (Entrance Address 106 Broadview Avenue)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70354.pdf

TE33.43 - Application to Remove a Tree - 191 and 193 Neville Park Boulevard

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council deny a permit to remove the red oak tree straddling the rear property line between 191 and 193 Neville Park Boulevard.

Origin

(May 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree straddling the rear property line between 191 and 193 Neville Park Boulevard.  Both property owners are requesting removal, indicating that the tree is in a poor location and is at high risk for causing property damage or personal injury.

 

The subject tree is a red oak (Quercus rubra) tree measuring 83 cm in diameter, and is protected under City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 658, Ravine and Natural Feature Protection.  The tree is in fair to good condition.  Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 20, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 191 and 193 Neville Park Boulevard - Application to Remove a Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69519.pdf

Speakers

Yiu Chung Mang
Franco Ntazinda

TE33.51 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 15 and 21 Iceboat Terrace

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 648 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below, as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes:

 

-           15 and 21 Iceboat Terrace.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 22, 2014) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 15 and 21 Iceboat Terrace
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69571.pdf
Attachment - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 15 and 21 Iceboat Terrace
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69572.pdf

TE33.53 - 219 Queen Street West Public Art Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.           City Council approve the 219 Queen Street West Public Art Plan as attached to the report dated May 30, 2014 from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council approval of the 219 Queen Street West Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a publicly-accessible, privately-owned area of the development site.

 

This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the project overview; public art sites and opportunities; art selection process; technical review; estimated budget; jury composition; projected time line; project team and role of the public art consultant.

 

The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 30, 2014) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - 219 Queen Street West Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69694.pdf

TE33.62 - Construction Staging Area - 580 Kingston Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York
Attention
Bill 672 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the closure of the sidewalk and the curb lane on the north side of Kingston Road, between a point 60.9 metres east of Lee Avenue and a point 98.7 metres east of Lee Avenue, from July 9, 2014 to June 1, 2015.

 

2.         City Council rescind the existing "No Stopping, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Mon. to Fri., except public holidays" restriction on the north side of Kingston Road, between a point 55.9 metres east of Lee Avenue and a point 107.4 metres east of Lee Avenue.

 

3.         City Council rescind the existing "No Parking, 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Mon. to Fri., except Public Holidays" restriction on the north side of Kingston Road, between a point 55.9 metres east of Lee Avenue and a point 107.4 metres east of Lee Avenue.

 

4.         City Council enact a "No Stopping Anytime" restriction on the north side of Kingston Road, between a point 55.9 metres east of Lee Avenue and a point 107.4 metres east of Lee Avenue.

 

5.         City Council direct that Kingston Road be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

6.         City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

7.         City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

Origin

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Harhay Construction Management Ltd. is constructing a 6-storey condominium building at No. 580 Kingston Road.  They need to close the north curb lane and sidewalk on Kingston Road and establish a temporary pedestrian walkway in the north curb lane in order to do their work.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - 580 Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69663.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1406 - Construction Staging Area - 580 Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69664.pdf

TE33.64 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic / Parking Regulations for 2014 Canadian National Exhibition - Non-Delegated

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Bills 666 and 667 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the temporary traffic and parking regulations on streets in the vicinity of Exhibition Place which are impacted during the Canadian National Exhibition, identified in Appendix “A” attached to the report (May 27, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's authority to enact temporary traffic and parking amendments required to enhance traffic operations and pedestrian safety during the annual Canadian National Exhibition (CNE), which takes place from August 15 to September 1, 2014, inclusive.  As this staff report concerns roadways with regular TTC service, City Council approval is required. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 27, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic/Parking Regulations for 2014 Canadian National Exhibition - Non-Delegated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69725.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0730 - Temporary Adjustments to Traffic/Parking Regulations for 2014 Canadian National Exhibition - Non-Delegated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69726.pdf

TE33.73 - Installation of Accessible Parking Space - June 2014 (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bill 663 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of an on-street accessible parking space at the location identified in Appendix A attached to the report (May 28, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the installation of an on-street accessible parking space for persons with disabilities.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject street, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 28, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Installation of Accessible Parking Space - June 2014 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69861.pdf

TE33.75 - King Street - Extended Peak Period Regulations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
14 - Parkdale-High Park, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bills 716 and 717 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the extension of the hours of the traffic and parking regulations on King Street between Bathurst Street and Roncesvalles Avenue and between Jarvis Street and Parliament Street to encompass 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m. as contained in Appendix 2 of the report (June 2, 2014) from the Director, Transportation Infrastructure Management, Transportation Services.

Origin

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Infrastructure Management

Summary

At the end of April 2014, major rehabilitation of the westerly section of the Gardiner Expressway commenced.  The work comprises three major construction projects including the replacement of the west deck of the elevated section generally between Strachan Avenue and Bathurst Street, the replacement of the median on a portion of the at-grade section, and bridge structural rehabilitation.   The replacement of the west deck will be undertaken in two stages, with a two-month break in July/August 2015 during the Pan Am Games, and will be completed by December 2016.  These works require the closure of one lane of traffic in each direction and, as a result, some motorists seek alternate routes for their daily commutes to avoid the traffic delays on the Gardiner Expressway.

 

King Street is one convenient alternative connection providing access to and from the west via The Queensway.  In order to improve traffic flow on King Street and enhance the vehicle capacity of the east-west corridor in the southern portion of the City, it is recommended that the peak period parking and traffic restrictions that currently exist on King Street between Bathurst Street and Jarvis Street (7:00-10:00 a.m. and 3:00-7:00 p.m.) be extended westerly from Bathurst Street to Roncesvalles Avenue and easterly from Jarvis Street to Parliament Street.  These changes will not only help vehicular traffic flow on King Street but also improve the King Street streetcar operations and service, which is the TTC's busiest surface transit route carrying approximately 60,000 passengers on an average weekday.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Infrastructure Management - King Street - Extended Peak Period Regulations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69848.pdf

TE33.79 - Traffic Control Signals - Broadview Avenue and Bridgepoint Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the  appropriate City staff and Bridgepoint to discuss options for alternative timing of the installation of the traffic signals as contemplated by condition #44 of the subdivision agreement, and that the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B be requested to report to City Council on July 8, 2014 on the outcome of these discussions.

Origin

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Broadview Avenue and Bridgepoint Drive and prohibit traffic movements through the intersection to Victor Avenue, which is off-set approximately 15 metres north of Bridgepoint Drive.

 

The installation of traffic control signals at this location will satisfy conditions of site plan approval for the Bridgepoint Hospital redevelopment while providing a safe environment for both vehicular and pedestrian traffic.

 

The Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates streetcar service on Broadview Avenue.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 2, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Control Signals - Broadview Avenue and Bridgepoint Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70461.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1026 - Traffic Control Signals - Broadview Avenue and Bridgepoint Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70462.pdf
(May 29, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Control Signals - Broadview Avenue and Bridgepoint Drive - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69730.pdf

TE33.81 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8C" to Exclude 1220-1230 Dundas Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "8C", as attached in Appendix "A" of the report (May 26, 2014) from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to amend the boundary of Permit Parking Area 8C.

 

Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of Permit Parking Area 8C to exclude the property located at 1220-1230 Dundas Street East as requested by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 13, 2014.  We are recommending approval of the realignment as it will not impact negatively on the Permit Parking Area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Toronto and East York District - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8C" to Exclude 1220-1230 Dundas Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69873.pdf
Appendix A - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8C" to Exclude 1220-1230 Dundas Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69874.pdf

TE33.82 - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8D" to Exclude 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the amendment to Schedule B of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 925, Permit Parking, to incorporate a revised map of permit parking area "8D", as attached in Appendix "A" of the report (May 26, 2014) from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting authority from City Council to amend the boundary of Permit Parking Area 8D.

 

Transportation Services has assessed the realignment of Permit Parking Area 8D to exclude the property located at 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East as requested by Toronto and East York Community Council on May 13, 2014.  We are recommending approval of the realignment as it will not impact negatively on the Permit Parking Area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(May 26, 2014) Report from the Manager, Right of Way Management, Toronto and East York District - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8D" to Exclude 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69871.pdf
Appendix A - Realignment of Permit Parking Area "8D" to Exclude 1029 and 1075 Queen Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-69872.pdf

TE33.86 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Attention
Communications TE33.86.28 to TE33.86.32 have been submitted on this Item

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following requests, noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable By-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

 

1.         Temporary liquor license/patio extension to be held at The Factory Theatre, 125 Bathurst Street from January 7 to 18, 2015 from 3:30 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. on weeknights (Monday to Thursday) and from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. on weekends (Friday to Sunday) during The Fringe's Next Stage Theatre Festival.

 

2.         Temporary liquor license extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the following establishments during the 39th Toronto International Film Festival to be held from September 4 to 14, 2014:

 

Buonanotte, 19 Mercer Street
The Drake Hotel, 1150 Queen Street West
The Hoxton, 69 Bathurst Street
STORYS, 11 Duncan Street
Malaparte, 350 King Street West

 

3          Temporary patio extension for the Toronto Eaton Chelsea outside the hotel's Elm Street entrance on November 22, 2014 from 2:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight during the Downtown Yonge BIA's Ice, Wine and Dine of Winter Magic Event.

 

4.         Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions at Maple Leaf Square during the 2015 International  Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) World Junior Hockey Championship Fan Festival events to be held from December 26, 2014 to January 5, 2015, with road closures on Bremner Boulevard, with further details to be provided.

 

5.         Temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m., during Indie Week Canada 2014, to be held from October 15-19, 2014 (including to 4:00 a.m. on Monday, October 20, 2014), for the following establishments, dates and times listed in the letter from Ms. Montesano:
 
Adelaide Hall
Brooklynn Bar
Bovine Sex Club
The Cadillac Lounge
The Cage 292
Cherry Cola's Rock N'Rolla Cabaret and Lounge
Crawford
Free Times Café
Nocturne Nightclub
The Hideout on Queen
DeTour Bar
The Peakcok
The Rivoli
The Silver Dollar Room
Supermarket
Underground Garage
Rock N' Horse Saloon
The Round
Tota Lounge
The Paddock Tavern

 

            and that the AGCO be advised of City Council's objection to a 4:00 a.m. temporary liquor licence extension for Czehoski's during Indie Week

 

6.         Temporary liquor licence extensions until 3:00 a.m. for the following establishments participating in the Liberty Village Grand Prix of Festivals, to be held on July 18 and 19, 2014:

 

25 Liberty Bistro, 25 Liberty Street
Aroma Espresso Bar, 120 Lynn Williams Street
Bar Vespa, 167 East Liberty Street
Brazen Head Irish Pub 165 East Liberty Street
Caffino Ristorante, 1185 King Street West
Cinema, 135 Liberty Street
Joker Café, 165 Dufferin Street
Locus 144 Lounge, 171 East Liberty Street
Maizal Quesadilla Café, 133 Jefferson Avenue
Mildred's Temple Kitchen 85 Hanna Avenue
Shoeless Joe’s, 1189 King Street West
Vogue Supper Club, 42 Mowat Avenue
Williams Landing, 120 Lynn Williams Street

 

7.         Temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m., indoors only, at various establishments participating in Soundtrack of the City - Kensington to be held from August 28, 2014 to September 1, 2014:

 

Cloak & Dagger, 394 College Street

Detour Bar, 193 Baldwin Street

El Mocambo, 464 Spadina Avenue

Free Times, 320 College Street

Lola, 40 Kensington Avenue

Rancho Relaxo, 300 College Street

Silver Dollar, 486 Spadina Avenue

 

8.         Temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m., indoors only, at various establishments participating in Soundtrack of the City - TIFF to be held from September 4, 2014 to September 14, 2014:

 

Bovine Sex Club, 542 Queen Street

Cherry Cola's, 200 Bathurst Street

Detour, 193 Baldwin Street

Velvet Underground, 510 Queen Street West

 

B.        City Council not approve the following requests for temporary liquor licence extensions:

 

1.         Spotlight Toronto's East End Crab Boil events to take place on Sunday, July 27, 2014, and Sunday, August 24, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the parking lot at 110 Adelaide Street East, near Jarvis, and advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of its objection to these events.

 

C.        City Council concur in the action taken by the Toronto and East York Community Council in approving a temporary patio extension for the Banknote Bar at 665 King Street West, from June 17 to July 30, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., each day for World Cup events, due to the timing.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council, under its delegated authority, for liquor licensing purposes:

 

A.        Declared the following to be events of municipal significance:

 

1.         Toronto Argonauts Football Club Inc., pre-game festival/outdoor events to be held on the following dates and times at the Rogers Centre, Gate 11 area at the corner of Bremner Boulevard and Navy Wharf Court:

 

*Saturday, July 5, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
*Saturday, July 12, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
 Tuesday, August 12, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
 Sunday, August 17, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
 Saturday, October 4, 2014 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
*Friday, October 10, 2014 from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
 Saturday, October 18, 2014 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
 Saturday, October 25, 2014 from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.
 Friday, November 7, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m.
*Sunday, November 16, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
*Sunday, November 23, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

 

2.         The Fringe's Next Stage Theatre Festival to be held at The Factory Theatre, 125 Bathurst Street, from January 7 to 18, 2015 from 3:30 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. on weeknights (Monday to Thursday) and from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. on weekends (Friday to Sunday).

 

3.         32nd Annual Franco-fete de Toronto event to be held at Yonge Dundas Square from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Saturday, July 5, 2014 and 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Sunday, July 6, 2014.

 

4.         Amendment to the times of The Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts, on September 6, 2014 from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. rather than 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., as previously approved by the Toronto and East York Community Council on May 13, 2014 (TE32.74)

 

5.         CASKDAYS to be held from October 24 to 26, 2014 at the Evergreen Brick Works, 550 Bayview Avenue, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. each day.

 

6.         10th Annual "Salsa on St. Clair" to be held on July 19 and 20, 2014 on St. Clair Avenue West between Christie Street and Humeward Drive in the East and Winona Drive in the West

 

7.         3rd Annual Tres event to be held by La Carnita on Saturday, August 23, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. at the parking lots at 491 College Street and 289 Palmerston Avenue.

 

8.         39th Toronto International Film Festival to be held from September 4 to 14, 2014 at various locations.

 

9.          Downtown Yonge BIA events, as follows:

 

a.         Fashion on Yonge event to be held on September 3, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Trinity Square; and

 

b.         The Ice, Wine and Dine as part of Winter Magic event on November 22, 2014 from 2:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight on Elm Street, between Yonge and Bay.

 

10.       The 519 Annual Green Space Toronto Festival events:

 

Starry Night on:

June 26, 2014 from 7:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m. in Cawthra Square Park

 

Green Space on Church - Celebration Fundraiser in conjunction with WorldPride on:
June 27, 2014 from 5:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m., in Cawthra Square Park
June 28, 2014 from 1:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m. in Cawthra Square Park
June 29, 2014 from 1:00 p.m. to 11:59 p.m. in Cawthra Square Park

 

Green Space at Ryerson – Celebration Fundraiser in conjunction with WorldPride on:
June 28, 2014 from 1:00 p.m. to 12:59 p.m. in Ryerson University Quad
June 29, 2014 from 1:00 p.m. to 12:59 p.m. in Ryerson University Quad

 

11.       Toronto Cocktail Week to be held from September 22-28, 2014 at various venues, including:

 

September 23, 2014 – Industry Day #2 from 12:00 noon to 6:00 p.m., Thompson Toronto, 550 Wellington Street West;

September 26, 2014 – Whiskey 3-Way Gala – 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., 99 Sudbury, 99 Sudbury Street;

September 27, 2014 – The Grid's Cocktail Generator – 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., Andrew Richard Designs, 571 Adelaide Street East.

 

12.       Toronto-Cuba Friendship Day to be held on August 23, 2014 from 2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Nathan Phillips Square, with beer garden.

 

13.       2015 International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) World Junior Hockey Championship Fan Festival to be held from December 26, 2014 to January 5, 2015, at Maple Leaf Square, Bremner Boulevard.

 

14.       Spotlight Toronto "Pintxos TO" event to take place on Sunday, July 6, 2014 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the parking lot at 495 Wellington Street West, near King Street and Portland Street.

 

15.       CBC Soccer Nation World Cup Viewing Party to be held on July 12, 2014 from 10:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. and on July 13, 2014 from 10:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on John Street from Wellington Street to Front Street and on Front Street, slightly west of John Street to slightly west of Simcoe Street.

 

16.       Toronto Brunch Market to be held on Sunday, August 17, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., at MakeWorks, 1139 College Street.

 

17.       City of Toronto's Live Green Toronto Festival to be held at Yonge Dundas Square on July 19, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m.; and noting that there will be road closures on Yonge Street from Edward to Queen, Dundas Square Street from O'Keefe Lane to Yonge and Victoria Street.

 

18.       Indie Week Canada 2014, to be held from October 15-19, 2014, at various locations.

 

19.       Liberty Village Grand Prix of Festivals, to be held on July 18 and 19, 2014, at various venues.

 

20.       First Annual Toronto Music Run along Lakeshore, followed by an after party, to be held on August 14, 2014, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. with the start/finish at Ontario Place Parking Lot 2 off of Remembrance Drive.

 

21.       Soundtrack of the City - Kensington to be held from August 28, 2014, to September 1, 2014, at various venues.

 

22.       Soundtrack of the City - TIFF to be held from September 4, 2014, to September 14, 2014, at various venues.

 

B.        Approved the request for a temporary patio extension for the Banknote Bar at 665 King Street West, from June 17 to July 30, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., each day for World Cup events, due to the timing of such events.


C.        Did not approve the following requests for Events of Municipal Significance:

 

1.         Spotlight Toronto's East End Crab Boil Events Parts 1 and 2, to be held on the following dates from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at the 110 Adelaide Street East Parking Lot near Jarvis:

 

July 27, 2014; and
August 24, 2014

 

2.         The Bellwoods Block Party to be held on the following dates from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day, at a private dead end lane at 198 Walnut Avenue:

 

Sunday, July 6, 2014
Sunday, August 3, 2014

 

D.        Did not approve the following request for a temporary liquor licence extension:

 

1.         Stirling Room, 16 Trinity Street, Historic Distillery District -Various events associated with WorldPride 2014 to be held from June 20 to June 30, 2014, as outlined in the e-mail from Mr. Keroglidis.

 

E.         Deferred consideration of the following until the August 12, 2014 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council:

 

1.         The Bellwoods Block Party events to be held on the following dates from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day, at a private dead end lane at 198 Walnut Avenue:

 

Sunday, September 7, 2014
Sunday, September 14, 2014

Saturday, October 4, 2014 (Nuit Blanche night edition) from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Communications (Community Council)

(April 22, 2014) Letter from Erika Campbell, Manager, Events, Toronto Argonauts Football Club Inc., requesting that the Toronto Argonauts Football Club Inc., pre-game festival/outdoor events to be held on various dates at the Rogers Centre, Gate 11 area at the corner of Bremner Boulevard and Navy Wharf Court, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE33.86.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47698.pdf
(May 15, 2014) Letter from Lucy Eveleigh, General Manager, The Toronto Fringe, requesting that The Fringe of Toronto Theatre Festival's Next Stage Theatre Festival, to be held from January 7-18, 2015, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of liquor licence for The Fringe Club at the Factory Theatre, outdoor patio extensions for The Factory Theatre, 125 Bathurst Street from 3:30 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. on weeknights (Monday to Thursday) from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00a.m. on weekends (Friday to Sunday) (TE.Main.TE33.86.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47699.pdf
(May 20, 2014) Letter from Jose Bertrand, Director of Operations, Franco-fete de Toronto, requesting that the 32nd annual Franco-fete de Toronto event to be held at Yonge Dundas Square, from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. on July 5, 2014, and 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on July 6, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE33.86.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47701.pdf
(May 21, 2014) Letter from Lido Chilelli, on behalf of the Cabbagetown Festival Committee and The Cabbagetown BIA, requesting that Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting that the various establishments listed in the letter from Lido Chilelli, be granted liquor licence/patio extensions from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. on September 6 and from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. September 7, 2014, during the Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts. (TE.Main.TE33.86.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47702.pdf
(May 22, 2014) Letter from Julian Morana, 9 Gallon Enterprises Inc., requesting that CASKDAYS, to be held from October 24 to 26, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. each day, at the Don Valley Brick Works, 550 Bayview Avenue, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE33.86.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47703.pdf
(May 22, 2014) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc requesting that the 10th Annual "Salsa on St. Clair", to be held on July 19 and 20, 2014, on St. Clair Avenue West between Winona and Christie, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting temporary liquor licence/patio extensions from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. on Saturday and 12:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. on Sunday for the restaurants on the north and south side of St. Clair between Winona and Christie, including, but not limited to, those listed in the letter. (TE.Main.TE33.86.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47704.pdf
(May 21, 2014) E-mail from Thi Dinh, requesting that the 3rd annual event, featuring local food, music and art, to be held by La Carnita on Saturday, August 23, 2014, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., at the Parking lots at 491 College Street and 289 Palmerston Avenue, be declared and event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE33.86.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47705.pdf
(May 22, 2014) Letter from Maxine Bailey, Vice President, Advancement, requesting that the 39th Toronto International Film Festival to be held from September 4 to 14, 2014, at various locations, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for Buonanotte, The Drake Hotel, The Hoxton, STORYS, and Malaparte. (TE.Main.TE33. .8)
(May 26, 2014) Letter from Mark Garner, Executive Director and Chief Staff Officer, Downtown Yonge BIA, requesting that its Fashion on Yonge event on September 3, 2014 from 3:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Trinity Square, and the Ice, Wine and Dine of Winter Magic event on November 22, 2014, from 2:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., on Elm Street, be declared events of municipal significance; and requesting a temporary patio extension for the Toronto Eaton Chelsea outside the hotel's Elm Street entrance during the event. (TE.Main.TE33.86.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47814.pdf
(April 28, 2014) Letter from Rebecca Caulford, Honeybea Designhive, requesting that The Bellwoods Block Party to be held on Sunday, July 6, Sunday, August 3, Sunday, September 7, and Sunday, September 14, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. each day, and on Saturday, October 4, 2014 (Nuit Blanche night edition) from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at a private dead end lane at 198 Walnut Avenue, be declared events of municipal significance (deferred from the May 13, 2014 meeting of the Toronto and East York Community Council) (TE.Main.TE33.86.10)
(April 17, 2014) Letter from John R. Farrell, Director of Development, requesting that The 519 Annual Green Space Toronto Festival events, Starry Night, Green Space on Church and Green Space at Ryerson, to be held from June 26-29, 2014, Cawthra Square Park and Ryerson University Quad, as outlined in the letter from Mr. Farrell, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE33.86.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47831.pdf
(June 6, 2014) E-mail from Laas Turnbull, Publisher/Editor-in-Chief, The Grid, requesting that the Toronto Cocktail Week, to be held on September 22-28, 2014, at various venues, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47932.pdf
(June 4, 2014) Letter from Sharon Skup, Secretary/Treasurer, Canadian-Cuban Friendship Association Toronto, requesting that the Candian-Cuban Friendship Association is holding their 19th Annual Toronto-Cuba Friendship Day on Saturday, August 23, 2014, from 2:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Nathan Phillips Square, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47954.pdf
(June 2, 2014) Letter from Darryle Boynton, General Manager, Toronto-2015 IIHF World Junior Hockey Championship, requesting that the 2015 International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) World Junior Hockey Championship Fan Festival, to be held from December 26, 2014 to January 5, 2015, be declared an event of municipal significance, and requesting an extended road closure from December 23, 2014 to January 5, 2015, from 7:00 a.m. to 11:59 p.m. on Bremner Boulevard from York Street to Lakeshore Boulevard. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47955.pdf
(June 4, 2014) Letter from Frank Kocis, Spotlight Toronto, requesting that PintxosTO: A Celebration of Tapas to be held on July 6, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., in the parking lot at 495 Wellington Avenue West, near King Street and Portland Street, be declared an event of municipal significance, and requesting a temporary liquor license for this event. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47957.pdf
(June 4, 2014) Letter from Frank Kocis, Spotlight Toronto, requesting that East End Crab Boil, to be held on July 27, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., in the parking lot at 110 Adelaide Street East Parking Lot near Jarvis, be declared an event of municipal significance, and requesting a temporary liquor license. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47958.pdf
(May 23, 2014) E-mail from Andrew Gayle, requesting that CBC Soccer Nation World Cup Viewing Party, to be held on July 12 and 13, 2014, from 10:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. on Saturday and 10:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Sunday, on John Street from Wellington Street to Front Street and on Front Street, slightly west of John Street, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-47991.pdf
(June 10, 2014) Letter from Frank Kocis, Spotlight Toronto, requesting that East End Crab Boil part 2, to be held on August 24, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at 110 Adelaide Street East Parking Lot near Jarvis, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.18)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48011.pdf
(June 9, 2014) Letter from Dela Kumapley and Bryanna Dubreuil, Toronto Brunch Market, requesting that the Toronto Brunch Market to be held on Sunday, August 17, 2014, from 10:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., at MakeWorks, 1139 College Street, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.19)
(June 12, 2014) E-mail from Mark Singh, Program Manager, Partnerships & Innovation, Environment & Energy, requesting that the Live Green Toronto Festival to be held at Yonge Dundas Square on July 19, 2014 from 12:00 noon to 10:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance; and noting that there will be road closures on Yonge Street from Edward to Queen, Dundas Square Street from O'Keefe Lane to Yonge and Victoria Street. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.20)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/comm/communicationfile-48028.pdf
(June 13, 2014) Letter from Katia Montesano, Founder/Director, requesting that Indie Week Canada 2014, to be held from October 15-19, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a temporary extension until 4:00 a.m. for those establishments listed in the letter from Ms. Montesano. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.21)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Louie Cristello, requesting a temporary patio extension for the Banknote Bar at 665 King Street West, from June 17 to July 30, 2014, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m., each day for World Cup events. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.22)
(June 16, 2014) Letter from Lynn Clay, Executive Director, Liberty Village BIA, requesting that Liberty Village Grand Prix of Festivals, to be held on July 18 and 19, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting temporary liquor licence extensions until 3:00 a.m., for the establishments listed in the letter from Ms. Clay. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.23)
(May 26, 2014) E-mail from Jamie Schouela, Executive Vice President, Marketing, Blue Ant Media, requesting that the First Annual Toronto Music Run, to be held on August 14, 2014, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at Ontario Place Parking Lot 2 off of Remembrance Drive, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.24)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Jeannie Reid, Director, Music City North, requesting that Soundtrack of the City - Kensington to be held from August 28, 2014, to September 1, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. at various establishments as outlined in the e-mail from Ms. Reid (TE.Supp.TE33.86.25)
(June 16, 2014) E-mail from Jeannie Reid, Director, Music City North, requesting that Soundtrack of the City - TIFF to be held from September 4, 2014, to September 14, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. at various establishments as outlined in the e-mail from Ms. Reid (TE.Supp.TE33.86.26)
(June 17, 2014) E-mail from George Keroglidis, Operations & Events Manager, Sterling Room, requesting a liqour licence extension for World Pride, to be held from June 20, 2014 to June 29, 2014, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE33.86.27)

Communications (City Council)

(May 12, 2014) E-mail from George Milbrandt, Chair, Toronto Beer Week regarding temporary liquor licence extensions during the 5th Annual Toronto Beer Week (CC.New.TE33.86.28)
(June 20, 2014) Memo from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's, regarding a temporary liquor licence for a beer garden, tent, etc. for the Toronto Plaza Hotel (Parking Lot) on August 3, 2014 from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. as part of the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival. (CC.New.TE33.86.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48668.pdf
(July 4, 2014) E-mail from Suranchana Pattamakowit, Royal Thai Embassy, Ottawa regarding a liquor licence extension for the "Destination Thailand" event at Yonge-Dundas Square on September 14, 2014 from 10:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. (CC.New.TE33.86.30)
(July 4, 2014) E-mail from Dougal Bichan, Festival Director, BIG on Bloor Festival requesting adding Penny's Place (1306 Bloor Street West) to the list of establishments for temporary patio-liquor licence extensions for the BIG on Bloor Street Festival to be held on July 19, 2014 from 1:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. and on July 20, 2014 from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. (CC.New.TE33.86.31)
(June 26, 2014) E-mail from Elke Grenzer, Director, The Culture of Cities Centre regarding a road closure in connection with a community-based art event in the Honest Ed's parking lot on August 6, 2014. (CC.New.TE33.86.32)

TE33.89 - Objection to Liquor Licence Application for Increased Capacity, 53-55 Colborne Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence expansion application for Switch Bar, 53-55 Colborne Street (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence expansion application.

 

2.         City Council request the AGCO and the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to participate in any additional proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the AGCO and the LAT in this matter and to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to the current liquor licence issued for the Premises in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Origin

(June 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell, Ward 28, Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Summary

2356662 Ontario Inc. has applied to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (AGCO) to increase the indoor area capacity of their liquor licence at Switch Bar, 53-55 Colborne Street (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking an increase from 155 patrons to 270 for their indoor area.

 

The City objects to the application for increased capacity. The Premises has generated numerous complaints to the City relating to noise disturbing nearby residents. The City's Municipal Licensing and Standards division have initiated charges for violation of the City’s noise by-law and for operating as an entertainment establishment without a licence. These matters are due for scheduling in court.

 

Until such time that appropriate noise mitigation measures have been implemented at the Premises to prevent impacts on neighbouring residents it is premature to have the capacity for the Premises increased. An increase to almost double the current capacity will exacerbate the impacts felt by area residents in terms of noise and other nuisances. Even if appropriate noise mitigation measures are in place, this application for an expansion of capacity is not in the public interest given the size of the proposed increase from 155 to 270, unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. Under no circumstance should the expansion application be granted without additional conditions being attached to the licence.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 12, 2014) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell - Objection to Liquor Licence Application for Increased Capacity, 53-55 Colborne Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70669.pdf

TE33.94 - Staff Representation at an OMB Appeal Hearing for 17 Beechwood Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal Committee of Adjustment File A0333/14TEY for the property at 17 Beechwood Drive.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Appeal of File No. A0333/14TEY in order to impose conditions on the Ontario Municipal Board's approval of the application.

Origin

(June 16, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mary Fragedakis, Ward 29, Toronto-Danforth

Summary

The applicant has applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A0333/14TEY) for minor variances from Zoning By-law 6752 and 569-2013 to permit the construction of a detached garage at the rear of a detached bungalow at 17 Beechwood Drive (the "Application").  The proposed garage will be accessed from both the existing driveway and from the laneway at the rear.

 

The Application was approved by the Committee of Adjustment on Wednesday June 11, 2014 (the "Decision").

 

The subject property is located on the east side of Beechwood Road just north of O'Connor Drive. The property is designated "Neighbourhoods" in the Official Plan,  and is zoned R1B Residential in Zoning By-law 6752 of the former Borough of East York and RD (f12.0; a370; d0.6) in Zoning By-law 569-2013 of the City of Toronto.

 

While the variances to facilitate the proposed garage are acceptable, there are concerns with the garage having access from both the existing driveway off Beechwood Drive and the laneway at the rear. 

 

This motion would give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Decision and attend the OMB hearing in order to seek the imposition of a condition requiring the existing driveway to be removed, front curb restored, and the rear laneway access permit to be issued. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 16, 2014) Letter from Councillor Mary Fragedakis - Staff Representation at an OMB Appeal Hearing for 17 Beechwood Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70706.pdf
Attachment - Staff Representation at an OMB Appeal Hearing for 17 Beechwood Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70707.pdf

TE33.95 - Traffic Regulations - Cherry Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bills 698 and 699 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Recommendations 4 and 5 of Item TE9.42 respecting Traffic Regulations on Cherry Street adopted by City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011 to be in effect on July 10, 2014.

 

2.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to submit the necessary Bills required to give effect to the recommendation in the report (June 16, 2014) from the Director, Toronto and East York District,

Origin

(June 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to immediately enact traffic regulations on the newly constructed section of Cherry Street.

 

The traffic regulations were previously approved to commence in conjunction with the start of streetcar service on Cherry Street. The streetcar service is now expected to start well after the opening of the roadway. These regulations include reserved lanes for a transit right-of-way extension for the King Street streetcar line along the east side of the roadway, stopping prohibitions for bicycle lanes in each direction, a 40 km/h speed limit, turn prohibitions at several intersections, and pay-and-display parking regulations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(June 16, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Traffic Regulations - Cherry Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70697.pdf

TE33.98 - Review of Official Plan Policies for Bathurst Street and Raglan Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
21 - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to initiate a review of Official Plan policies, for the lands along both sides of Raglan Avenue between St. Clair Avenue West and Claxton Boulevard, and for lands on the west side of Bathurst Street between Vaughan Road and Claxton Boulevard, and for the lands along Vaughan Road between Bathurst and Maplewood, and report to the Toronto and East York Community Council in 2015 providing recommendations with respect to height, density, built form, public lanes, community benefits under Section 37, and any other related matters as they pertain to the evaluation of new development within the noted areas.

 

2.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to schedule a community consultation meeting for the proposed Official Plan Amendment with the Ward Councillor.

 

3.         City Council direct that notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the area.

 

4.         City Council direct that notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations under the Planning Act.

Origin

(June 17, 2014) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's West

Summary

The request to initiate a review of Official Plan policies for Bathurst Street and Raglan Avenue.

Background Information (Community Council)

Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc - Review of Official Plan Policies for Bathurst Street and Raglan Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-70772.pdf

New Business - Meeting 54

CC54.1 - Report on Violation of Code of Conduct: Mayor Rob Ford

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
First Item on Wednesday, July 9.

Origin

(April 28, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the finding that Mayor Ford violated the Code of Conduct.

 

2.         City Council request that Mayor Ford apologize to Councillor Ainslie in writing and on the floor of Council.

Summary

City Council at its May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting deferred consideration of this Item until such time as Mayor Ford returned.

 

Summary from Integrity Commissioner's report:

 

Councillor Ainslie complained that Mayor Ford contravened the Code of Conduct for Members of Council ("Code of Conduct") by sending a "robocall" message to Ward 43 residents.   The call unfairly accused Councillor Ainslie of not listening to his constituents on the Scarborough Subway vote. This was a breach of Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct) of the Code of Conduct. It is recommended that City Council ask the Mayor to apologize to Councillor Ainslie.

Background Information

(April 28, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Report on Violation of Code of Conduct: Mayor Rob Ford (CC54.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71089.pdf

CC54.2 - Appointment of the Toronto Ombudsman

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications CC54.2.1 and CC54.2.2 have been submitted on this Item

The appointment of an Ombudsman requires a vote of 30 Members

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable person and labour relations or employee negotiations

Origin

(June 2, 2014) Report from the City Manager

Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider the appointment of the Ombudsman and confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.         City Council direct the confidential instructions adopted by City Council remain confidential at this time and be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.

Summary

City Council at its June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014 meeting deferred consideration of this Item until the July 8 and 9, 2014 Council meeting.

 

Summary from the City Manager's report:

 

City Council at its meeting on October 30, 2012 considered the re-appointment of the Toronto Ombudsman for an additional five (5) year non-renewable term.  City Council adopted to extend the term of the Ombudsman to November 16, 2015 on the same terms and conditions.

 

As specified in the Toronto Ombudsman’s Employment Agreement with the City of Toronto, the City, as the employer, is required to notify the Toronto Ombudsman by November 16, 2014 whether the City intends to re-appoint the Ombudsman for an additional five (5) year non-renewable term.

Background Information

(June 2, 2014) Report from the City Manager on Appointment of the Toronto Ombudsman (CC54.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71093.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

Communications

(July 4, 2014) Letter from Dianne Green (CC.Supp.CC54.2.1)
(July 9, 2014) Submission from Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 10, York Centre - Toronto Star and Globe and Mail articles (CC.New.CC54.2.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48674.pdf

CC54.3 - Integrity Commissioner Report on Violation of Code of Conduct: Councillor Mammoliti

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Second Item on Wednesday, July 9.

Communications CC54.3.1 and CC54.3.2 have been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(June 24, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the finding that Councillor Mammoliti has violated the Code of Conduct;

 

2.         City Council suspend the remuneration paid to Councillor Mammoliti in respect of his services as a member of council for a period of 90 days, commencing September 1, 2014.

Summary

A citizen complained that Councillor Mammoliti contravened the Code of Conduct for Members of Council ("Code of Conduct") by improperly accepting gifts, favours or benefits from the sale of tickets to an event held on May 22, 2013.

 

An investigation was conducted into the complaint.  Councillor Mammoliti’s office organized a fundraising dinner/dance along with a third party Event Company on May 22, 2013. Tickets were sold at $500.00 or $5,000.00 for a table of 10. Over 200 people attended, including, lobbyists, companies doing business with the City or in the Councillor’s ward, family members and staff from the Councillor’s office.

 

Staff members worked on the event during City work hours. Tasks done by Councillor Mammoliti's staff included sending out invitations, designing tickets arranging for printing, following up on RSVPs, generating invoices, arranging for cheque pick up, communicating with musicians, security staff, florist, baker and Banquet Hall.

 

Some businesses declined to attend, but advised the Councillor's staff they would send money in the form of donations. In some cases, Councillor Mammoliti’s staff revised invoices and removed references to the May 22 event. One contractor was told by staff that the Councillor’s name should not appear “anywhere.” A member of the Councillor's staff told another staff member not to use the City of Toronto landline but to use a City supplied cell phone when following up on the RSVPs for the event.

 

The Event Company paid the Councillor $80,000 as a "gift" from the profit generated by ticket sales for the event. Councillor Mammoliti breached Article IV of the Code of Conduct by accepting this cash gift.

Background Information

(June 24, 2014) Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Violation of Code of Conduct: Councillor Mammoliti (CC54.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71097.pdf
Attachments 1 to 35 as listed in the report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71098.pdf

Communications

(July 7, 2014) Letter from Morris Manning (CC.New.CC54.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48606.pdf
(July 9, 2014) E-mail from Staff A (CC.New.CC54.3.2)

CC54.4 - Report on an Inquiry into Lobbying by a Former Senior Public Office Holder

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 2, 2014) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

Recommendations

The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receive the findings in the attached report.

Summary

This is an inquiry into whether Kevin Mark Maloney (Mark Maloney), a former senior public office holder, breached Chapter 140 of the Toronto Municipal Code (the Lobbying By-law) by:

 

  • Placing a public office holder in a conflict of interest, in breach of § 140-45B;
  • Lobbying during the one year post-employment period, in breach of § 140-9A; or
  • Lobbying about a procurement process when not permitted to do so, in breach of § 140‑41A.

 

The Registrar determined that Mr. Maloney had breached all of the above provisions.

 

While registered as a consultant lobbyist, Mr. Maloney was employed by a member of Council to work on the same issue for which he was registered.  Mr. Maloney did not advise the councillor of his lobbyist registration.  His conflicting roles as a registered consultant lobbyist and staff of a member of Council, working on the same issues in both capacities, placed the councillor in an apparent conflict of interest, contrary to § 140-45B.

 

Mr. Maloney breached both §§ 140-9A and 140-41A by communicating with a City employee who was not the designated point of contact about a procurement process during the “blackout period”.  Mr. Maloney did not advise the City employee that he was a former senior public office holder or that he was a registered consultant lobbyist.  When his employment with the councillor ended, Mr. Maloney was prohibited as a former senior public office holder from lobbying for 12 months by § 140-9A.  As a registered lobbyist, he was prohibited from communicating with the City employee about the procurement during the “blackout period” by § 140-41A. 

Background Information

(July 2, 2014) Covering report from the Lobbyist Registrar, submitting an Inquiry Report on Lobbying by a former Senior Public Office Holder (CC54.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71095.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Inquiry Report into Lobbying by a former Senior Public Office Holder
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71099.pdf

CC54.5 - Status Update - Internet Voting Service for Persons with Disabilities for the 2014 Municipal Election

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CC54.5.1 has been submitted on this item.

Bill 674 has been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(July 7, 2014) Report from the City Clerk, Chief Information Officer and City Manager

Recommendations

The City Clerk recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the City Clerk to continue to work with persons with disabilities, organizations that represent them and the Disability Issues Committee to ensure accessible elections and to consider options for internet and telephone voting in future elections.

 

2.         City Council amend by-law 120-2014 to authorize the use of internet and telephone voting by all electors in advance voting as the Clerk deems appropriate for conducting future elections.

 

3.         City Council request the City Clerk to report back to Council at their August 26 and 27, 2014 meeting on a plan for potential implementation of internet and telephone voting in future elections.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise City Council that an Internet and Telephone Voting Service ("IVS") for persons with disabilities cannot be implemented in time for the 2014 Municipal Election. Given the time constraints and the complexities of providing a system that is fully accessible and secure for the start of internet and telephone registration on September 8, 2014, the Clerk and Scytl have mutually agreed to cancel the IVS project for the 2014 Municipal Election. Proceeding with an IVS for the 2014 Municipal Election would severely compromise the principles of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996 ("MEA") and the Clerk's ability to deliver an election that protects the rights and votes of voters with disabilities.

The City Clerk and Scytl remain fully committed to working with persons with disabilities, the organizations that represent them and the Disability Issues Committee to identify accessible and secure alternative voting methods that will allow voters with disabilities to independently cast their vote. The Clerk also remains committed to continuing to work towards delivering internet and telephone voting in future elections.

The Clerk will continue to work with Scytl to address and resolve the outstanding issues and will report back to Council with an update in August, 2014.

 

Legal Services was consulted during the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(July 7, 2014) Report from the City Clerk, the Chief Information Officer and the City Manager on Status Update - Internet Voting Service for Persons with Disabilities for the 2014 Municipal Election (CC54.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71290.pdf
(July 2, 2014) Report from the City Clerk on Status Update - Internet Voting Service for Persons with Disabilities for the 2014 Municipal Election - Notice of Pending Report (CC54.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71069.pdf

Communications

(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Sandra Carpenter (CC.New.CC54.5.1)

CC54.6 - Appointment of Members to the 2014 Compliance Audit Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(July 2, 2014) Report from the Chair, Nominating Panel for the 2014 Compliance Audit Committee, transmitted by the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the report from the Chair, Nominating Panel for the 2014 Compliance Audit Committee.

 

The Nominating Panel for the 2014 Compliance Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the following individuals to the Compliance Audit Committee for a term of office coincident with the term of Council that takes office following the 2014 regular municipal election:

 

-           John Hollins, as Chair;

-           Teja Rachamalla; and

-           James Ayres.

 

2.         City Council appoint the following individuals to the Compliance Audit Committee as alternate members in the order listed, such appointments to be effective only in the event that any vacancies on the Committee occur:

 

1.         Sudabeh Mashkuri; and

2.         Mark Gannage.

Summary

City Council on February 19 and 20, 2014 established a Nominating Panel to consider and recommend appointments to the Compliance Audit Committee. City Council also directed the Nominating Panel to submits its list of recommended candidates as a public report.

 

Summary from Panel Chair's report:

 

 The Nominating Panel for the 2014 Compliance Audit Committee is recommending appointment of 3 members and 2 alternate members to the 2014 Compliance Audit Committee. 

Background Information

(July 2, 2014) Report from the Chair, Nominating Panel for the 2014 Compliance Audit Committee (CC54.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71066.pdf

CC54.7 - Queen Street West (between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street) - Restaurant Study Zoning By-law Appeal Settlement Offer

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Communications CC52.7.1 and CC52.7.2 have been submitted on this Item

Bill 719 has been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(July 2, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Recommendations

The City Solicitor and the Chief Planner recommend that:

 

1.         City Council reject the settlement offer contained in Attachment 1 of this report;

 

2.         City Council repeal Interim Control By-law 1393-2012;

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to consent to an adjournment of the hearing of the appeals of By-laws 1049-2013 and 1050-2013, pending input from the working group which Council has directed be established to develop better compliance with City by-laws regarding restaurants, bars and entertainment establishments, as per MM45.16, adopted by City Council on December 16, 2013;

 

4.         City Council request the Chief Planner and City Solicitor report in the first half of 2015 on the status of and for further direction regarding the ORHMA's appeals of By-laws 1049-2013 and 1050-2013.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present a settlement offer received from the Ontario Restaurant, Hotel and Motel Association ("ORHMA") in respect of their appeals to the Ontario Municipal Board of By-laws 1049-2013 and 1050-2013, enacted by City Council on July 19, 2013. These By-laws amended former City of Toronto By-law 438-86 and the new harmonized Zoning By-law 569-2013 for an area along Queen Street West from Dufferin Street to Roncesvalles Avenue.  The By-laws added additional restrictions for restaurant and related uses, including a limit on the concentration of restaurants in the study area. An Interim Control By-law that prohibits new restaurants in this area remains in force as a result of the appeals.

 

ORHMA's offer to settle is contained in Attachment 1.

Background Information

(July 2, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Queen Street West (between Roncesvalles Avenue and Dufferin Street) - Restaurant Study Zoning By-law Appeal Settlement Offer (CC54.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-71107.pdf

Communications

(July 7, 2014) E-mail from John Nunziata (CC.New.CC54.7.1)
(July 10, 2014) E-mail from Peter Thoma, Partner, urbanMetrics inc. (CC.New.CC54.7.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/cc/comm/communicationfile-48609.pdf

Member Motions - Meeting 54

MM54.1 - Request to Adjust Pay Parking Machine Hours on Queen Street West between Spadina Avenue and Simcoe Street - by Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of Item PW27.13. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.

Bill 697 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Colle, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York, to adjust the Pay Parking Machine Hours on Queen Street West between Spadina Avenue and Simcoe Street to end at 9:00 p.m.

 

2.         City Council amend all related by-laws accordingly.

Summary

The parking machine hours were recently extended to midnight from 9:00 p.m. Local businesses and the local BIA indicate that these parking changes have had a negative impact on business as a result and have made a formal request to the Office of Ward 20 to revert parking machine hours back to ending at 9:00 p.m.

 

This section of Queen Street West is the home to some of the City's most historic and important live music venues. Changing the parking machine hours back to ending at 9:00 p.m. is in line with the City's recent steps towards increasing City support for the music industry.

 

Requires Re-opening:

 

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW27.13 – adopted by City Council December 16, 17 and 18, 2013, only as it pertains to Pay Parking Machine Hours on Queen Street West.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.1)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71056.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71386.pdf

MM54.2 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board towards an Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis, recommends that:

 

1.         Upon the coming into force and effect of site specific by-law amendments for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue and for the lands known as 319 Carlaw Avenue, City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $45,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by $32,246.00 of Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3700270) and $12,754.00 from 319 Carlaw Avenue (Source Account XR3026-3700371) for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the grounds at Roden/Equinox Public School, and more specifically for the Outdoor Learning Commons.

 

2.         City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the School Board has entered into a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prepared in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.

 

3.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning to co-ordinate preparation of the Community Access Agreement by the City Solicitor and to participate in preparation of the terms and conditions in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor as directed in Part 2 above.

 

4.         City Council authorize City Officials to execute a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.

Summary

This Motion seeks to support the Roden/Equinox Public School Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School. Roden/Equinox Public School serves a diverse community and has been an integral part of the Coxwell and Gerrard neighbourhood since 1907.  Over the years, it has undergone many structural changes to accommodate the growing needs of the student population and the community.

 

Roden was completely rebuilt as an open concept school in 1969 - all teaching areas open into a shared space called a "common area".  Revitalizing the available green space and creating an outdoor learning opportunity is a priority for the school community.  The revitalized outdoor area will feature a vibrant environment with extra seating, environmentally sensitive learning areas, native plantings and outdoor classrooms.

 

At the May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to By-law No. 706-2006 respecting 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue to reallocate the funds previously secured for local park improvements towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School.  In addition, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to By-law No. 413-2009 (OMB) respecting 319 Carlaw Avenue to reallocate part of the funds previously secured for park bench beautification towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School.  City Council further directed that any of the funds previously allocated towards specific projects that had not been spent, including accrued interest, were to be reallocated to alternative community benefits including: local park improvements; streetscape improvements; community facility improvement; public art; community gardens; pedestrian and cycling facilities; and heritage related improvements.  With respect to the reallocation, City Council requested the Director, Community Planning to consider reallocation of the funds previously allocated toward specific projects that had not been spent, together with accrued interest, towards current community needs and to co-ordinate with funds that have been secured through other Section 37 Agreements which affect the local area.  Staff were also to co-ordinate amendments to the applicable Section 37 Agreement with the current owner of the subject lands.

 

On June 17, 2014, Toronto and East York Community Council (TEYCC) adopted amendments to Site Specific Zoning By-law 705-2006, for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue.  The amendments adopted by TEYCC would reallocate $75,000 of the funds collected under Section 37, together with any accrued interest, toward improvements at the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School, provided arrangements satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation are made with the School Boards for public access.

 

TEYCC also adopted amendments to Site Specific Zoning By-law Site Specific 413-2009 (OMB) on June 17, 2014, for the lands known as 319 Carlaw Avenue.  The amendments adopted by TEYCC would reallocate $20,000 of the funds collected under Section 37 as follows: $7,246 for park bench beautification in the area of the site; and $12,754 for improvements at the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School, provided arrangements satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation are made with the School Board for public access.

 

This Motion proposes to provide a total of $45,000 of Section 37 funds to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) towards the cost of the Outdoor Learning Commons at Rodent/Equinox Public School, upon the revised by-laws coming into force and effect and the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the TDSB for the capital improvements to the grounds at Roden Equinox Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

The Community Access Agreement to be signed by the TDSB will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the revitalized grounds at Roden/Equinox Public School. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the TDSB, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.2)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71007.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71387.pdf

MM54.3 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board towards an Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

 1.        Upon the coming into force and effect the site specific by-law amendments for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue, City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $45,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue (Source Account: XR3026-3700270) for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto District School Board for capital improvements to the grounds at Morse Street Public School, and more specifically for the Morse Street Public School Outdoor Learning Commons.

 

2.         City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the School Board has entered into a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prepared in consultation with the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.

 

3.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning to co-ordinate preparation of the Community Access Agreement by the City Solicitor and to participate in preparation of the terms and conditions in consultation with the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor as directed in Part 2 above.

 

4.         City Council authorize City Officials to execute a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation and the Ward Councillor.

Summary

This Motion seeks to support the Morse Street Public School Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School. Morse Street Public School is an urban school serving a diverse community in an urban setting. Revitalizing the available green space and creating an outdoor learning opportunity is a priority for both the school community and the surrounding neighborhood.

 

The revitalized outdoor area will feature a vibrant learning and social environment with extra seating, environmentally sensitive play areas and plantings.

 

At the May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting, Toronto City Council requested staff to bring forward an amendment to By-law No. 706-2006 respecting 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue to reallocate the funds previously secured for local park improvements towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and towards the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School.  City Council further directed that any of the funds previously allocated towards specific projects that had not been spent, including accrued interest, were to be reallocated to alternative community benefits including: local park improvements; streetscape improvements; community facility improvement; public art; community gardens; pedestrian and cycling facilities; and heritage related improvements.  With respect to the reallocation, City Council requested the Director, Community Planning to consider reallocation of the funds previously allocated toward specific projects that had not been spent, together with accrued interest, toward current community needs and to co-ordinate with funds that have been secured through other Section 37 Agreements which affect the local area.  Staff were also to co-ordinate amendments to the applicable Section 37 Agreement with the current owner of the subject lands.

 

On June 17, 2014, Toronto and East York Community Council (TEYCC) adopted amendments to Site Specific Zoning By-law 705-2006, for the lands known as 201 Carlaw Avenue and 66 Boston Avenue.  The amendments adopted by TEYCC would reallocate $75,000 of the funds collected under Section 37, together with any accrued interest, towards improvements at the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School and the Outdoor Learning Commons at Roden/Equinox Public School, provided arrangements satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation are made with the School Boards for public access.

 

This Motion proposes to provide a total of $45,000 of Section 37 funds to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) towards the cost of the Outdoor Learning Commons at Morse Street Public School, upon the revised by-laws coming into force and effect and the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the TDSB for the capital improvements to the grounds at Roden Equinox Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

The Community Access Agreement to be signed by the TDSB will contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and access to the revitalized grounds at Morse Street Public School. The Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the TDSB, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.3)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71050.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71388.pdf

MM54.4 - Norman Bethune Day - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council commemorate the 75th Anniversary of the death of Norman Bethune, a great Canadian who influenced medicine worldwide and honours our City with his inventive and life saving medical procedures and influence.

 

2.         City Council proclaim November 12, 2014 as Norman Bethune Day.

Summary

Norman Bethune had an exceptional life where he provided medical services and knowledge to many across the world.  His tremendous efforts and selflessness brought honour to Canada making his life and work a tribute to be honoured.

 

His service began during and at the end of World War I when he performed in the medical services of all three armed forces.  In 1936, he was in Madrid at the front of the Spanish Civil War leading a mobile blood-transfusion service where he was later hailed as a major contributor to the military through his medical methods of delivering bottled blood to the wounded near the front lines, saving many lives.  His transfusion methods were also rendered in Málaga, where an esplanade along the waterfront is dedicated as "The Promenade of the Canadians", “In memory of the assistance that the people of Canada through the efforts of Norman Bethune gave to fleeing Malagueñans in 1937.”

 

Norman Bethune continued his work in China where he continued his medical service but also taught his medical skills to set up military hospitals in villages. Mr. Bethune travelled by horseback to areas under attack risking his own life to aid others.  On November 12, 1939, Norman Bethune died of blood poisoning, caught while on the battlefield in China.

 

Today, his memory is celebrated in all Chinese schools where students are taught of his contributions. Two medical schools bear his name along with hospitals. 

 

Although not born in Toronto, after spending the first three years of elementary school in this City, and Grades Six and Seven in Jesse Ketchum Public School on Davenport Road, he entered the University of Toronto, where he graduated as a medical doctor in 1916.

 

Determined to find a cure for tuberculosis, Norman Bethune became a prominent chest surgeon, did medical research, invented instruments used in tubercular surgery and carried out a campaign in favour of government programs to eradicate tuberculosis.  Norman Bethune was aware of the need for all to have access to medicine and was one of the earliest Canadian advocates of socialized medicine — medicare.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.4)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71049.pdf

MM54.5 - Release of Section 37 Funds for the Detailed Design and Construction Drawings for the Modification of the Traffic Ramps exiting from the Frederick G. Gardiner Expressway at York Street, Bay Street and Yonge Street - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, recommends that:

 

 1.        City Council increase the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Transportation Services by $1,000,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by the Section 37 funds secured in the development at 90 Harbour Street and 1 York Street (source account: XR3026- 3700491), to fund the procurement of detailed design and construction drawings for the modification of the traffic ramps exiting from the Frederick G. Gardiner Expressway at York Street, Bay Street and Yonge Street.

Summary

At its August 25, 26 and 27, 2010 meeting, City Council approved the York/Bay/Interchange Reconfiguration- Municipal Class Environmental Assessment. The recommended design will reconfigure the eastbound off-ramps to a single shorter direct off-ramp to Harbour Street at Lower Simcoe Street. The shorter ramp will allow exiting motorists to turn right or left from Harbour Street to Lower Simoce Street, York Street, Bay Street, and Yonge Street. These modifications will maintain acceptable traffic conditions and improve traffic mobility within the area while freeing up road space, sidewalks and open space to enable improvements to the public realm. In particular, the reconfiguration will allow for an improved design and use of ‘York Off-Ramp Park’, which currently sits under a circular off-ramp.

 

Section 37 funds were secured in the development at 90 Harbour Street and 1 York Street in the amount of $10,000,000.00 to be applied by the City for the modification of the traffic ramps exiting from the Frederick G. Gardiner Expressway at York Street, Bay Street and Yonge Street.  Presently, the indexed sum of $5,010,506.58 has been received towards the funding of the ramp modifications. The balance of $5,000,000.00 is to be paid at the time the construction tender is ready to be awarded, or first building occupancy, whichever is earlier.

 

Engineering and Construction Services Division are prepared to begin the procurement of detailed design and construction drawings for the ramp modifications, to be funded from Section 37 funds.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.5)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71062.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71429.pdf

MM54.6 - Changes to the 'Retirement Homes Act, 2010' by the Government of Ontario and its Impact on the City of Toronto's By-laws - by Councillor Chin Lee, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Community Development and Recreation Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Chin Lee, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with Toronto Public Health, City Planning, any other City of Toronto Division involved with retirement homes, the Retirement Homes Regulatory Authority (RHRA) and the Government of Ontario, to report back to the August 26, 2014 meeting of City Council, on what changes are required to bring the City of Toronto's by-laws in compliance with the updated Retirement Homes Act, 2010.

Summary

In 2010, the Government of Ontario adopted changes to the Retirement Homes Act, 2010, effective April 15, 2012, to better protect seniors living in these facilities.  There appears to be confusion among residents and City staff on what role the City plays in licensing and inspecting retirement homes following changes to the Act.

 

The Act created the Retirement Home Registration Authority (RHRA), which gives licensing authority for retirement homes, and communications from RHRA stated that:

 

              " all retirement homes are subject to city by-laws and must operate in accordance with them. Please also note that there is no community public consultation when an application is received, nor do neighbours have any input into licensing a retirement home."

 

Concerns and questions from residents have not been answered as clearly as desired, including:

 

-           Does RHRA check with the City (compliance with city by-laws) prior to issuing the license?

 

-           The RHRA started "routine" inspections on a three-year cycle in March 2014, while the City of Toronto inspects group homes annually.  Are residents then more at risk?

 

-           What are the City of Toronto's responsibilities as it pertains to retirement homes, especially non-profit senior community homes, under the updated Act?

 

-           Is the City still responsible for conducting inspections at its long-term care facilities (e.g., food safety inspections, environmental health inspections, routine inspections and nursing inspections)?

 

-           Who is responsible for maintaining property standards at retirement homes and who ensures this is done? 

 

-           Is the RHRA or the City responsible for public health inspection at retirement homes?

 

-           What are the City of Toronto's responsibilities in regards to the building and fire codes at retirement homes?

 

-           Who is responsible for safely evacuating bed ridden residents from the retirement home facility during an emergency?

 

-           Who oversees the RHRA?

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.6)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71061.pdf

MM54.7 - Option for Monthly Billing and Payment of Water Bills - by Councillor Chin Lee, seconded by Councillor Raymond Cho

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Chin Lee, seconded by Councillor Raymond Cho, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to investigate the possibility and cost (and savings) of allowing residents who opt for electronic billing and payment to receive monthly invoices for water usage.

Summary

The City of Toronto has been installing new water meters that automatically transmits daily water usage data from homes and businesses to the City.  There is a request from residents and businesses to receive more regular monthly water bills rather than the hefty tri-yearly utility bills.

 

Under the old system, the meters were read only three times per year, and the utility bills were sent three times per year.  The cost of postage to mail bills and then process the payments are incurred three times per year.  The budget has been set according to this schedule.

 

As the new water meters now allow the City to collect timely usage data, monthly billings should be an option for accounts requesting this service provided that they sign-up for electronic billing and payment.  This is not unprecedented as the City of Toronto already allows residents to pay their property taxes on a monthly basis.

 

Another advantage of monthly water bills is that residents and businesses will have more timely knowledge of excessively high water usage, due to leaks, etc.  The City will also be collecting the garbage fees on a more timely basis.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.7)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71058.pdf

MM54.8 - Provincial Heritage Plaque for Guild Park and Gardens - by Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
43 - Scarborough East
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paul Ainslie, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council support the application to the Ontario Heritage Trust to recognize the Guild Park and Gardens through the Provincial Plaque Program.

Summary

Toronto City Council should support the application to the Ontario Heritage Trust to recognize the Guild Park and Gardens through the Provincial Plaque Program.

 

Such a plaque would identify the Guild Park and Gardens for its important role in Ontario's heritage.

 

Specifically, the site would be recognized for its history as an artists' colony (known as "The Guild of All Arts") and for its collection of outdoor sculpture and architectural fragments preserved from notable Toronto buildings.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.8)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71057.pdf

MM54.9 - Fostering Transit Innovation - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communications MM54.9.1 and MM54.9.2 have been submitted on this Item

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission and the President and Chief Executive Officer, Metrolinx to investigate and report back on the feasibility of establishing an ongoing forum for discussing transit planning and associated urban issues that draws upon regional, national and international best practices and innovation;  membership could include, but not necessarily be limited to transportation and transit planning professionals from the City of Toronto and the surrounding regions, the Province, consultants, planning associations, academics, interested members of the public and elected officials.

Summary

Transit plays a vital role in the day to day lives of the Torontonians.  An effective transit system gives people the freedom to access all of what the City has to offer and enhances their opportunities for employment and education.  It is a major determinant in the City's prosperity and shaping the City's growth as well as that of the surrounding region.

 

The City is on the verge of an expansion of transit infrastructure and services that is unprecedented.  Notwithstanding this planned investment, much of the public discussion has focused on infrastructure choices and funding issues.  More attention needs to be placed on fostering innovation to enhance transit services, and improve service delivery and inter-agency coordination, to improve the overall experience of transit users.

 

An ongoing public forum to discuss and debate the objective of improving transit service informed by industry best practices and innovations would benefit planners and decision makers as they establish priorities affecting the evolution of the transit system.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.9)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71064.pdf

Communications

(July 6, 2014) E-mail from Cameron MacLeod and Joe Drew, Executive Directors, CodeRedTO (MM.Supp.MM54.9.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/comm/communicationfile-48593.pdf
(July 7, 2014) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (MM.New.MM54.9.2)

MM54.10 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds, 600 Fleet Street and Section 45 Funds, 75 Iannuzzi Street for construction of the Fort York Visitor Centre at 250 Fort York Boulevard - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $372,710.16 gross, $0 net, for the purposes of construction of the Fort York Visitor Centre to be fully funded by Section 37 community benefits secured in the development at 600 Fleet Street ($119,403.82 from source account XR3026-3700092) and from Section 45 community benefits secured in the development of 75 Iannuzzi Street ($253,306.34 from source account XR3028-4500114).

Summary

Councillor Layton's office is working with staff in Economic Development and Culture on the revitalization of Fort York as a legacy project of the Bicentennial of the War of 1812 commemoration. The Fort York Visitor Centre is the largest component of the overall work and has been identified as a key project to serve the Fort York Neighbourhood by enhancing access to, and interpretation of, the Fort and providing much needed community space and programming.

 

Section 37 funds in the amount of $119,403.82 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 600 Fleet Street towards the construction costs of the Fort York Visitors Centre. Section 45 funds in the amount of $253,306.34 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 75 Iannuzzi Street towards the construction costs of the Fort York Visitors Centre. Combined, these Section 37 and Section 45 funds represent a total of $372,710.16.

 

The total estimated budget for the Fort York Visitor Centre is $25,213,000, including $3,700,000 from Section 37 and Section 45 contributions. These Section 37 and Section 45 funds have been included within the $3,700,000 figure but have not yet been specifically identified within the 2014 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.10)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71065.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71430.pdf

MM54.11 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 64 Brentwood Road South - by Councillor Peter Leon, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Peter Leon, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:

 

 1.        City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning Staff to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment decision to refuse the minor variance application (A140/14EYK) for 64 Brentwood Road South and authorize the City Solicitor to retain an independent land use planner if necessary.

Summary

The owners of the land municipally known as 64 Brentwood Road South applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain minor variances (Application A140/14EYK) in order to build a new detached dwelling with an integral garage. The variances requested included increases to the permitted maximum lot coverage, gross floor area, main wall height, and dwelling depth, and a reduction to the minimum parking space width.

 

On May 22, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the application. There are concerns that the variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the Zoning By-law, and that the cumulative effect of the variances results in a large dwelling that does not fit in with the character of the neighbourhood.

 

This Motion is urgent as the Ontario Municipal Board hearing on this matter may be scheduled before the next City Council meeting.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.11)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71067.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission for 64 Brentwood Road South
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71068.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71431.pdf

MM54.12 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds for Capital Improvements to the Swansea Town Hall Community Centre - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the Association of Community Centre's approved 2014 Operating Budget for the Swansea Town Hall Community Centre by $159,488.79 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits related to the development at 2464, 2474, 2490 Bloor Street West (1 Old Mill Road) (source account: XR3026-3700524) and (2 Old Mill Road) (XR3026-3700605) to provide one-time funding for capital improvements pertaining to enhanced accessibility, rental space, the purchase of a power generator, additional energy saving retrofit and flooring replacement.

Summary

Authority is being sought to increase the Association of Community Centre's approved 2014 Operating Budget for the Swansea Town Hall Community Centre by $159,488.79 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits, for capital improvements pertaining to enhanced accessibility, rental space, the purchase of a power generator, additional energy saving retrofit and flooring replacement.

 

The development at 2464, 2474, 2490 Bloor Street West (1 Old Mill Road and 2 Old Mill Road) secured Section 37 agreements that included funding for Swansea Town Hall Community Centre capital improvements in the amount of  $106,232.49 ($100,000 plus indexing) and $53,256.30 ($50,000 plus indexing), respectively.  These funds have been received by the City.

 

At its meeting of April 3, 2013, City Council adopted the release of section 37 funds for Capital Improvements to the Swansea Town Hall Community Centre to provide one-time funding for capital improvements pertaining to enhanced accessibility. The Centre was unable to use the funds due to issues obtaining permits and as a result, returned the funds back to the City. The Centre has recently obtained the necessary permits for the capital improvements pertaining to enhanced accessibility.

 

The Swansea Town Hall Community Centre is an Association of Community Centres (AOCC) facility that provides meeting space for a diversity of programs and services for seniors, adults, and children with or without caregivers/parents. The building houses a Toronto Public Health Dental Clinic, the Swansea Memorial Library, the Swansea Senior's Association and the William Small Historical Archives.  Also associated with the Town Hall are several community groups and partners including Horticultural and Historical Societies and the Ratepayers' Association.  The Swansea Town Hall Community Centre also works regularly with other neighbourhood organizations such as the local Parks and Recreation Community Centre.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.12)

Background Information

Member Motion MM53.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71102.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71432.pdf

MM54.13 - Fair Media Access on City Property - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Government Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct that for all events held by the City, Mayor or Councillors to which media are invited, held at City Hall or in a City facility, all media outlets that are members of the City Hall Press Gallery be included.

 

2.         City Council direct that City staff, including facilities and communications staff, only support events to which media are invited in spaces large enough to accommodate the expected numbers of media, such as the Members Lounge.

Summary

The City Hall Press Gallery plays a vital role in the democratic process at City Hall and in  Toronto's civic process. Residents across Toronto gather their information from a wide array of news organizations and it is essential that all members of the press gallery have equal access to media conferences at Toronto City Hall.

 

The journalists of the Press Gallery and their publications rent space at City Hall and the City of Toronto has an obligation to ensure that all media outlets are treated equally.  

 

Recently Mayor Ford held a media Conference at City Hall at which he excluded accredited members of Toronto's Press Gallery.

 

Members of Council are free to decline media interviews but the Mayor or a Member of Council should not be permitted to hold a media conference on City property where accredited members of the Press Gallery are excluded.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.13)

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM54.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71096.pdf

MM54.14 - A Sign of Citizen Engagement: Improving Development Proposal Public Notices - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-third vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner to:

 

a.         undertake a review of the Development Proposal Public Notices toward signs that are attractive, use language that is informative and easy to understand while encouraging citizen involvement in the planning process;

 

b.         consult with residents' associations, development industry representatives and other relevant stakeholders while conducting the review; and

 

c.         report on the outcome of the review to the March 2015 meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee.

Summary

Development Proposal Public Notices on an application site are often the only information about a new building proposal that Toronto residents will encounter. That's why it's important that these notices are attractive and well-designed, written in language that is informative and easy for the average person to understand while encouraging involvement in the planning process.

 

Unfortunately, the City of Toronto's current Development Proposal notices fall far short of these goals. The notices are black and white with a very small picture of the planned building; the text is dry and does not encourage the reader to exercise their right to engage in issues that can have significant effects on their neighbourhood.

 

This Motion requests the Chief Planner to start a process to follow the lead of cities like Ottawa, which is the most recent Canadian municipality to receive public and critical acclaim for their Development Notice re-design.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.14)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71100.pdf

MM54.15 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board for the Construction of Childcare Facilities at Swansea Junior and Senior Public School - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

 1.        City Council authorize the transfer of $337,128 from the Planning Act Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR3026-3700528), fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West/1 Old Mill Drive, to the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund XR1103, to provide funding for the construction by the Toronto District School Board of a non-profit childcare facility at Swansea Junior and Senior Public School, 207 Windermere Avenue.

 

2.         City Council authorize an increase in the 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Children's Services of $337,128 gross, $0 net so that funds can be forwarded from the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund XR1103 to the Toronto District School Board  in accordance with the terms of agreement between the City and the Toronto District School Board for the construction of the child care facility at Swansea Junior and Senior Public School.

 

3.         City Council direct that, prior to any funds being forwarded to the Toronto District School Board, the Toronto District School Board enter into agreements with the City with respect to the specifications, construction and operation of the childcare facilities, and the transfer of funds from the City to Toronto District School Board, with terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager, Children's Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take all necessary action to give effect to these recommendations, and authorize the General Manager, Children's Services to execute the agreements with the Toronto District School Board on behalf of the City.

Summary

This Motion seeks to release Section 37 funds to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) for the purposes of the renovations of child care centre facilities at Swansea Junior and Senior Public School.

 

The renovations would be carried out by the TDSB and these funds would be released to the TDSB by the Children's Services Division in response to invoices submitted as renovations proceed.  An agreement between the TDSB and the City will be executed for the construction prior to any funds being transferred to the TDSB.  The agreement with the TDSB will address, among other matters, the following:

 

  • length of tenure for child care operations;
  • the TDSB repayment schedule if use prematurely ceases as a non-profit child care facility;
  • the requirement that Children's Services review/approve plans, specifications and budget for both internal and external work; and
  • financial reporting requirements.

 

Section 37 funds in the amount of $694,395 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West/1 Old Mill Drive for the purposes of day nursery capital projects.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.15)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71101.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71433.pdf

MM54.16 - Planning Study for Bloor Street West between Keele Street and the Humber River - Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Planning and Growth Management Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to

 

a.         undertake a review of the current built-form, density, height, and heritage value of the properties on Bloor Street West between Keele Street and the Humber River;

 

b.         consult with the community, including landowners and other stakeholder groups, together with the Ward Councillor, to understand the community's concerns and develop a vision for future development in the study area; and

 

c.         report back on the findings of the review and to provide recommendations for changes, if necessary, to the planning framework for the study area.

Summary

In 2005, the Bloor West Village Business Improvement Area, in collaboration with a number of neighbourhood organizations and resident groups participated in the Bloor West Village Urban Design Study, to discuss the future directions for growth in the village.  That study has since been accompanied by the 2013 Bloor West Village Way Heritage Design Nomination which further examined the heritage aspects of the neighbourhood. While these studies provide valuable information regarding the Bloor West Village area, neither have been approved by City Council.  While the Urban Design Study has been consulted and used as a tool when reviewing development proposals in the area, Planning Staff have applied Official Plan Policies and the more recent Avenues and Mid Rise Buildings Study, and performance guidelines completed in 2010 and approved by City Council when reviewing development proposals on "Avenue" areas such as Bloor Street in the vicinity of the Bloor West Village.  City Council in October 2012 requested "City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to undertake an Avenue Study along Bloor Street West between Runnymede Road and Keele Street". In light of the Avenue Study prioritization and city budget allocations for such studies and a recently initiated review of the avenue and mid-rise building study and performance guidelines, the requested avenue study has not been initiated.

 

A portion of Bloor Street West between Keele Street and the Humber River, is facing increasing pressure for re-development with recent planning applications and pre-application consultations.

 

This stretch of Bloor Street West currently has a diverse mix of commercial and residential uses in low-rise buildings.  The surrounding established residential neighbourhood is comprised mainly of two and three-storey detached houses.  In this context, community associations are increasingly voicing concerns that these new development proposals are not respecting the physical character of the main street and adding further impact to city services and infrastructure.  

 

A timely review is required to help determine appropriate built-form, height and heritage value in order to provide an updated planning framework, if necessary, for the street.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.16)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71103.pdf

MM54.17 - Request for attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Committee of Adjustment Decision respecting 145 Bathgate Drive - by Councillor Ron Moeser, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Ron Moeser, seconded by Councillor Peter Leon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain an outside planner to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decision to refuse the applications for consent and minor variance for 145 Bathgate Drive.

Summary

The owners of 145 Bathgate Drive submitted an application for consent to sever the property into two lots for detached residential dwellings (B005/14SC). One proposed lot would have a frontage of 15m on Ivan Road and a lot area of 556 sq metres; the other lot, at the northwest corner of Bathgate Drive and Ivan Road, would have a lot area of 696 sq metres.

 

The owner also submitted an application for a variance to permit the lot on Ivan Road to have a lot area of 556 m2 whereas the zoning by-law requires a minimum lot area of 696 m2 (A023/14SC).

 

There were a significant number of neighbourhood residents who voiced opposition to the proposal and on April 15, 2014 the Committee of Adjustment refused the applications.  The owner subsequently appealed the decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 at MM54.17)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71292.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Scarborough Panel - Notice of Decision on Consent for 145 Bathgate Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71293.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Scarborough Panel - Notice of Decision on Minor Variance/Permission Application for 145 Bathgate Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71294.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71434.pdf

MM54.18 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board towards Capital Improvements to the Playground at Faywood Public School - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
10 - York Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $110,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development at 545-555 Wilson Avenue, (source account XR3026-3700537), for the purpose of forwarding funds to the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the school playgrounds at Faywood Arts-Based Curriculum (ABC) Public School, and more specifically, the construction of a fully accessible playground.

 

2.         City Council direct that the funds be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the School Board has signed a Community Access Agreement with the City, governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and addressing community access to the improved facilities, drawn up in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

 

3.         City Council authorize the execution of a Community Access Agreement with the Toronto District School Board for the capital improvements to the grounds at Faywood ABC Public School, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council request the Director, Community Planning to participate in the preparation of the Community Access Agreement and request the City Solicitor to draw up the Agreement, in consultation with the Ward Councillor and Community Planning staff.

Summary

Section 37 funds have been secured and received in the development at 545- 555 Wilson Avenue for the purpose improving the existing recreational capital facilities in the Ward, in the amount of $400,000 plus accrued interest.  This Motion seeks to release Section 37 funds, in the amount of $110,000 to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) for the purposes of constructing a fully accessible playground at the Faywood Arts-Based Curriculum (ABC) Public School.

 

Faywood ABC School is located at 95 Faywood Boulevard and services the southern end of the Clanton Park area.  It is a central spot to the southern portion of the community and its park is typically filled with children playing after school and on weekends.  The Playground was last updated in July 2001.  It was built to service the needs of the school and surrounding community at the time.  Since then, the population in the area, including the number of children, has grown substantially as a result of infill building and new local developments.  The playground has become outdated and is no longer sufficient to meet the needs of the neighbourhood residents and school.

 

The TDSB is proposing the construction of a new playground to be built in the Faywood ABC School yard which will service the needs of all the area residents and the students at the same time.  This playground will be fully accessible to all residents, including those with accessibility limitations.  Unlike other neighbourhood parks in the area, this proposed playground is designed to provide increased accessibility to its participants.  This will be a unique park for the entire Clanton Park area as it will offer ground level elements and transfer platforms for use by those not physically abled and also includes many auditory stimulating components.

 

The Section 37 Implementation Guidelines approved by Council in 2007 state the following (section 5.7):

 

"Cash contributions toward the capital improvement of school board playgrounds are eligible S.37 community benefits where the playground serves as a local park, where the public will continue to have reasonable access for the foreseeable future, and where there is no local City-owned parkland performing a similar function in the same community that could otherwise benefit from the cash contribution."

 

The playgrounds at Faywood ABC Public School serve as a local park for the surrounding community.  A Community Access Agreement will be signed between the Toronto District School Board and the City to ensure that reasonable public access to the playgrounds continues.  The Agreement will also contain provisions governing the purpose of the funds as well as the financial reporting requirements. 

 

This Motion is urgent as the construction of the accessible playground should be completed prior to September when the students will return to school.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 at MM54.18)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71295.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71435.pdf

MM54.19 - Electronic Dance Music Concerts - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. City Council directed the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place to submit this report directly to City Council.

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, recommends that:

 

1. City Council adopt the recommendations outlined in the attached report from the Chief Executive Officer of Exhibition Place, dated July 4, 2014, entitled “Electronic Dance Music Concerts”.

 

Recommendations contained in the attached report:

 

1. Direct that the confidential information contained in the Board’s report dated January 21, 2014 entitled “Electronic Dance Music Concerts”, attached as Appendix B,  not be released publicly in order to protect the competitive positions and future economic interests of Exhibition Place;

2. Direct that the Confidential Attachment 1 to the City Solicitor's report dated April 7, 201 entitled "Electronic Dance Music Concerts" attached as Appendix E remain confidential as it contains advice and information that is subject to solicitor-client privilege; and

3. Authorize the Board to set an age restriction of 16 years and older for attendees at EDMs at Exhibition Place.

Summary

In April 2014, the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place adopted a policy directing Staff of Exhibition Place to not enter into any new negotiations with third parties to stage electronic dance music concerts (EDMs) in buildings controlled by Exhibition Place, subject to any executed license agreements and without limiting the existing rights of tenants including the Manager of BMO Field.

 

In response to the Board's decision, City Council at its May 6, 7 and 8, 2014 meeting required the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place to reverse its April policy decision and to adopt a policy consistent with City Council's decision of August 1, 2, 3 and 4, 2000 to permit such events at Exhibition Place, on condition that safety measures are established.

 

City Council also required the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place to direct the Chief Executive Officer of Exhibition Place to undertake a consultation process to review the safety protocol for Exhibition Place Facilities Requirements, consultation with the City of Toronto Emergency Services and Toronto Public Health for Electronic Dance Music Concerts and dance parties, and to make appropriate amendments resulting from this review to ensure that Exhibition Place and event producers provide a safe venue for these events and to report back to Council by July 2014..

 

The Board held a public consultation meeting on June 16, 2014 wherein City Services (EMS, Fire, Police and Public Health) and Exhibition Place staff were in attendance to respond to any questions posed.
 
This Motion is urgent as City Council has directed the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place to report back to Council by July, 2014 on the review of its April 11, 2014 decision, after completion of the consultation process and the review of its safety protocol, with its decisions on the hosting of Electronic Dance Music Concerts at Exhibition Place facilities.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.19)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71304.pdf
(July 4, 2014) Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, headed "Electronic Dance Music Concerts"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71296.pdf
(July 4, 2014) Appendix A - Requirements for Safety and EDM Protocols
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71297.pdf
(January 21, 2014) Appendix B - Report from the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place, to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place, headed "Electronic Dance Music Concerts"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71298.pdf
(January 21, 2014) Appendix C - Confidential Attachment 1 - From the Chief Executive Officer, Exhibition Place headed "Electronic Dance Music Concerts"
(April 7, 2014) Appendix D - Report from the City Solicitor to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place headed "Electronic Dance Music Concerts"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71300.pdf
(April 7, 2014) Appendix E - Confidential Attachment - From the City Solicitor to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place headed "Electronic Dance Music Concerts"
(June 17, 2014) Appendix F - Report from the City Solicitor to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place headed "Electronic Dance Music Concerts - Supplementary Report"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71302.pdf
Appendix G - Report on the Inquest into the Death of Allen Ho, Chief Coroner, Province of Ontario, dated October 2001
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71303.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71436.pdf

MM54.20 - 1926 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Request for further direction - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice that is subject to solicitor client privilege

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (July 8, 2014) from the City Solicitor:

 

1.         City Council adopt the instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.         City Council authorize the public release only of the recommendation adopted by Council and, if confidential recommendation 1 is adopted, also authorize the public release of Appendices 1 and 2 to the Confidential Attachment 1.  The remainder of the Confidential Attachment 1 shall remain confidential in all circumstances as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding pending litigation before the Ontario Municipal Board.

Summary

The applicant for 1926 Lake Shore Boulevard West has appealed its zoning by-law amendment to the Ontario Municipal Board due to Council's failure to make a decision within the times prescribed by the Planning Act.  An eight-day hearing has been scheduled to commence on September 2, 2014.  Witness statements are due on August 1, 2014.  The parties participated in a one-day mediation session on June 25, 2014.

 

The confidential attachment to the report (July 8, 2014) from the City Solicitor contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and must remain confidential.  The City Solicitor seeks further direction regarding the pending Ontario Municipal Board hearing that must be obtained at this Council meeting.


 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71340.pdf
(July 8, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on request for direction - 1926 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71341.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix 1 - confidential communication dated June 27, 2014 - made public on July 21, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71321.pdf
Confidential Appendix 2 - Section 37 Remainder Allocation - made public on July 21, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71322.pdf
Confidential Appendix 3 - Residents' position

MM54.21 - 2360-2378 Yonge Street and 31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue - Request for directions regarding Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - by Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice that is subject to solicitor client privilege

Recommendations

Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the following recommendations contained in the report (July 8, 2014) from the City Solicitor:

 

1.         That City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.         That the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report and the information contained in Appendix "A" be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor.  All other information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

At its meeting of June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014, City Council adopted Items NY32.20 and NY32.21, directing the City Solicitor and other City Staff to attend the joint Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for the above-noted matters to oppose the proposed Zoning By-law Amendments.

 

The staff reports recommended opposing the proposals because they were inconsistent with the planning vision for the area. 

 

This Motion is brought forward on an urgent basis as a pre-hearing conference for this matter is scheduled for July 17 and 18, 2014.  A two week hearing is scheduled to commence on November 12, 2014. Additional information has been received from the applicants and staff requires Council's instructions.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.21)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71332.pdf
(July 8, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on Request for directions regarding the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 2360-2378 Yonge Street and 31, 33, 35 and 37 Helendale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71333.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - Built Form Terms - made public on August 14, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71334.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - Map
Confidential Appendix C - Map

MM54.22 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board for the Construction of Childcare Facilities at Western Technical-Commercial School - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the transfer of $30,000 from the Planning Act Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR3026-3700604), fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 2500 Bloor Street West / 2 Old Mill Drive, to the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund XR1103, to provide funding for renovations by the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) of a non-profit childcare facility at Western Technical-Commercial School, 125 Evelyn Crescent.

 

2.         City Council authorize an increase in the 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Children's Services of $30,000 gross, $0 net so that funds can be forwarded from the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund XR1103 to the TDSB in accordance with the terms of agreement between the City and the TDSB for the renovations of the child care facility at the Western Technical-Commercial School.

 

3.         City Council direct that, prior to any funds being forwarded to the TDSB, the TDSB enter into agreements with the City with respect to the specifications, renovations and operation of the childcare facilities, and the transfer of funds from the City to TDSB, with terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager of Children's Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take all necessary action to give effect to these recommendations, and authorize the General Manager of Children's Services to execute the agreements with the TDSB on behalf of the City.

Summary

This Motion seeks to release Section 37 funds to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) for the purposes of the renovations to child care centre facilities at Western Technical-Commercial School, 125 Evelyn Crescent.

 

The renovations would be carried out by the TDSB and these funds would be released to the TDSB by the Children's Services Division in response to invoices submitted as renovations proceed.  An agreement between the TDSB and the City will be executed for the construction prior to any funds being transferred to the TDSB. The agreement with the TDSB will address, among other matters, the following:

 

  • Length of tenure for child care operations;
  • The TDSB repayment schedule if use prematurely ceases as a non-profit child care facility;
  • The requirement that Children's Services review/approve plans, specifications and budget for both internal and external work; and 
  • Financial reporting requirements.

 

Section 37 funds in the amount of $372,794 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 2500 Bloor Street West / 2 Old Mill Drive for the purposes of day nursery capital projects.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.22)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71308.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71437.pdf

MM54.23 - North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation - Reconfiguration of the Main Stage Theatre - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation to enter into an agreement with Diamond Schmitt Architects Incorporated for architectural services in relation to the reconfiguration of the Main Stage Theatre.

Summary

The Main Stage Reconfiguration Project is included in the approved 2014 Capital Budget. The project will divide the underutilized 1,750 seat Main Stage Theatre into two smaller venues for use by community arts organizations as detailed in the Board approved 5 year Strategic Plan.

 

During its meeting on January 29, 2014, as part of agenda item EX37.1 2014 Capital and Operating Budgets, Toronto City Council approved the Main Stage Reconfiguration Project at the Toronto Centre for the Arts.

 

Pursuant to the City of Toronto Act, 2006 ("COTA"), the North York Performing Arts Centre Corporation (the "Board") is continued as a city board. COTA provides that matters relating to the financial relationship between the City and the Board that were in effect immediately before the continuation of the Board as a city board remain in effect. Prior legislation establishing the Board provides that all contracts exceeding $500,000 that the corporation proposes to enter shall be submitted to Council for its approval.  As the value of the contract with Diamond Schmitt Architects Incorporated is in excess of $500,000, Council approval is required to authorize the Board to enter in to this agreement.

 

This motion is time sensitive as construction of the reconfiguration is scheduled to commence in October 2014 in time for the public opening of one of the new reconfigured venues in April 2015.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.23)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71338.pdf

MM54.24 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to the Toronto District School Board for the Construction of Childcare Facilities at Keele Street Junior and Senior Public School - Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the transfer of $357,267 from the Planning Act Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR3026-3700528), fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West /1 Old Mill Drive, and $179,536 from the Planning Act Reserve Fund (Source Account: XR3026-3700604 ), from the development at 2500 Bloor Street West /2 Old Mill Drive, for a total of $536,803 to the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund XR1103, to provide funding for the construction by the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) of a non-profit childcare facility at Keele Street Junior and Senior Public School.

 

2.         City Council authorize an increase in the 2014 Approved Operating Budget for Children's Services of $536,803 gross, $0 net so that funds can be forwarded from the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund XR1103 to the TDSB in accordance with the terms of agreement between the City and the TDSB for the construction of the child care facility at Keele Street Junior and Senior Public School.

 

3.         City Council direct that, prior to any funds being forwarded to the TDSB, the TDSB enter into agreements with the City with respect to the specifications, construction and operation of the childcare facilities, and the transfer of funds from the City to TDSB, with terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager of Children's Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take all necessary action to give effect to these recommendations, and authorize the General Manager of Children's Services to execute the three agreements with the TDSB on behalf of the City.

Summary

This motion seeks to release Section 37 funds, in the amount of $536,803 to the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) for the purposes of constructing child care centre facilities at Keele Street Junior and Senior Public School. 

 

The construction would be carried out by the TDSB and these funds would be released to the TDSB by the Children's Services Division in response to invoices submitted as construction proceeds.  An agreement between the TDSB and the City will be executed for the construction project prior to any funds being transferred to the TDSB. The agreement with the TDSB will address, among other matters, the following:

 

  • Length of tenure for child care operations.
  • The TDSB repayment schedule if use prematurely ceases as a non-profit child care facility.
  • The requirement that Children's Services review/approve plans, specifications and budget for both internal and external work.
  • Financial reporting requirements.

 

Section 37 funds in the amount of $372,794 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 2500 Bloor Street West /2 Old Mill Drive for the purposes of day nursery capital projects.  Section 37 funds in the amount of $694,395 including accrued interest have been secured and received in the development at 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West /1 Old Mill Drive for the purposes of day nursery capital projects.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.24) 

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71324.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71438.pdf

MM54.25 - AGCO Liquor Licence Application- 1166 Dundas Street West, The Contender - File# 816837 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for 1166 Dundas Street West, operating under the name "The Contender" (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

Summary

7037848 Canada Incorporated has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for the premises at 1166 Dundas Street West, operating under the name "The Contender" (“Premises”). The application is for an indoor capacity of 137 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns with respect to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. The Registrar of the AGCO should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application. 

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that council consider this matter at this council meeting.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.25)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71319.pdf

MM54.26 - Liquor Licence - 503 College Street - Gwailo - File No. 804872 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Raymond Cho

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Raymond Cho, recommends that:

 

 1.        City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Gwailo, 503 College Street (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Summary

2402477 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 503 College Street, operating under the name Gwailo (the “Premises”). The application is for an increase to the indoor capacity from 84 to about 142 patrons, whereas the outdoor capacity will decrease, from 27 to about 14 persons.

 

The Premises is located in an area with a large concentration of licenced establishments. There is concern in the community that this increase in capacity will cause noise and other disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated.  As such, this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.26)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71337.pdf

MM54.27 - Liquor Licence - 676 Queen Street West - Come and Get It - Licence No. 200092 - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence expansion application for Come and Get It, 676 Queen Street West (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.

Summary

Come and Get It Restaurant Inc. has submitted an application for an expansion of a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 676 Queen Street West operating under the name Come and Get It (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking an increase in the indoor capacity by 6 patrons, and has applied to have a new licenced outdoor area on a rear patio with a capacity of 62 patrons. Currently, the Premises has a liquor licence for the indoor area with a capacity of 34 patrons.

 

Under the City's Harmonized Zoning By-law 569-2013 a rear patio associated with a restaurant is not a permitted use on the property in which the Premises is located. The property is located immediately adjacent to a residential area and the Zoning By-law requires a separation distance of 30 metres from a residential lot. The Licensee requires a variance from the By-law in order to operate a rear patio on the property, whether it is licenced or not. Two restaurant studies conducted on Queen Street West, west of the subject site, have determined that rear patios should be prohibited for all restaurants located on Queen Street West in the areas studied. It is premature for the Premises to be issued a liquor licence for the rear yard patio until such time that the patio is permitted under the Zoning By-law.

 

Neighbouring residents and the local Councillor’s office are concerned that the operation of a new licensed rear patio will impact neighbouring residents. Therefore, if the rear patio licence is granted conditions should be attached to the licence to help prevent impacts related to noise, safety, litter, and other matters. Conditions may also be added to the indoor portion of the licence to help prevent impacts. This application for an expansion to the liquor licence is not in the public interest unless the proposed outdoor patio is permitted under the Zoning By-law and certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

This matter is deemed urgent as the placard deadline for objections has passed and a pre-hearing conference at the Licence Appeal Tribunal may be scheduled prior to the next meeting of Council.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.27)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71330.pdf

MM54.28 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds for Improvements to Art Eggleton Park (323 Harbord Street) - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Raymond Cho

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Raymond Cho, recommends that:

 

 1.        City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $25,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 42 Cash In Lieu funds obtained in the developments at 211 Montrose ($17,000) (Source Account XR2213-4200545)  and 120 Beatrice ($8,000) (Source Account XR2213-4200558) for improvements to Art Eggleton Park.

Summary

This item is urgent as it involves changes to a sports field that are required to be approved before our next scheduled City Council meeting.

 

Authority is being sought to amend the 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $25,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash In Lieu funds obtained in the development at 211 Montrose ($17,000) (Source Account XR2213-4200545) and 120 Beatrice ($8,000) (Source Account XR2213-4200558 ), for improvements to Art Eggleton Park.

 

Through a consultation process with the local Ward Councillor and Parks staff related to improvements in the nearby Bickford Park, a consensus has been reached to move t-ball from Bickford Park into Art Eggleton Park

 

This requires the installation of two new back stops and four new benches along with the purchase of a storage bunker for t-ball equipment storage in Art Eggleton Park, with the following allocation.

 

  • Two new base ball back stops –$18,000
  • Four new benches –$2,000
  • Storage bunker –$5,000

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.28) 

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71331.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71439.pdf

MM54.29 - To Authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment's decision on 562, 564 and 566 Spadina Crescent - by Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to defend, at the Ontario Municipal Board, the decision of the Committee of Adjustment on June 11, 2014, to refuse variances at 562, 564 and 566 Spadina Crescent.

Summary

At its meeting of June 11, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused applications for minor variances at 526, 564, and 566 Spadina Crescent. City Planning wrote in support of refusal. The decision has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, case number PL140590.

 

The requested variances would result in the development of buildings that are much too dense and deep compared to the prevailing neighbourhood character.

 

This motion is urgent because the next opportunity for Council to direct staff is at the August 26 meeting, and a Board hearing may be scheduled and held in the meantime.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.29)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71327.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 562, 564 and 566 Spadina Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71342.pdf

MM54.30 - Confirmation of the City's Interest in Use of the Weston Tunnel Cover - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Doug Ford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Doug Ford, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council confirm to Metrolinx the City's intention to use the north and south ends of the Weston Tunnel Cover that are not required by the Toronto Catholic District School Board for the new St. John the Evangelist Catholic School.

Summary

As part of Metrolinx's Georgetown South Project, they have lowered the rail corridor from Lawrence Avenue West to Weston Road, and are covering the corridor between Church Street and King Street.

 

A number of meetings have been held between the City, Metrolinx, and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, to discuss the future use of the tunnel cover.

 

The Toronto Catholic District School Board is in the process of executing agreements with Metrolinx for use of the middle portion of the tunnel cover to provide additional green space for the students of the new St. John the Evangelist Catholic School planned for construction in 2015, leaving north and south ends of the tunnel cover available for the City's use.

 

Past consultation with the community revealed that the preferred use for the north end of the tunnel cover would be for a community garden. Through discussion with Parks, Forestry and Recreation's Parks Development and Capital Projects Division, the opportunity to acquire lands adjacent to the south end of the tunnel cover has been identified, which would accommodate a children's play area.

 

A community meeting was held earlier this year on April 9, 2014 at which the plans for the new St. John the Evangelist School and proposed use for the south end of the tunnel cover were presented to the community. At this meeting, the community voiced strong support for the City's proposed use of the south end of the tunnel cover. At this meeting, the community also voiced interest in the City using the north end of the tunnel cover for a dog off-leash area, of which there are currently none in Ward 11.

 

This matter is urgent as Metrolinx will not formalize the agreement for use of the tunnel cover with the Toronto Catholic District School Board, until the City has confirmed its intention to use the remnant north and south ends of the tunnel cover.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.30)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71344.pdf
Weston Tunnel Cover - Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71469.pdf

MM54.31 - 89 Avenue Road: Municipal Board Appeal re Zoning Amendment - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Frank Di Giorgio, recommends that:

 

 1.        Part 1.f. of Item TE30.97 adopted by Council at its meeting on March 20, 2014 be amended to provide for the following:

 

"The owner will provide community benefits, pursuant to section 37 of the Planning Act, having a value of $650,000, indexed in accordance with City practice, prior to the first above-grade building permit. Such funds shall be used by the City for local streetscaping improvements (including the hydro burying initiative in the Yorkville Triangle Neighbourhood) and/or for capital improvements to local parks. The community benefits will be secured in an agreement pursuant to section 37 of the Act in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor."

Summary

At its meeting on March 20, 2014, following mediation of the dispute among the applicant and five opposing parties by the Municipal Board, Council authorized a settlement in principle of this development proposal. The resulting proposal will redevelop the site of the Howard Johnson Hotel with a 20-storey mixed-use development, having a commercial component in the range of 1,511 m2 and a residential component in the range of 7,960 m2 (approximately 61 units). Since that time, the parties have worked co-operatively to draft the various implementing planning documents in order to present these to the Municipal Board for final approval.

 

The purpose of this Motion is to revise the destination for the community benefits under section 37 of the Planning Act originally proposed at the mediation in order to better implement the current goals of the parties. In particular, the Toronto Reference Library would no longer be listed and greater flexibility is inserted in language dealing with streetscape improvements.

 

This Motion is considered urgent, because the parties are to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board on July 30, 31 and August 1, 2014.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.31)

Background Information

Member Motion MM 54.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71317.pdf

MM54.32 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds to Toronto Parks Forestry and Recreation towards the purchase and Installation of new Park Benches at Wadsworth Park- by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata, recommends that:

 

 1.        City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $48,210.40 gross, $0 net, fully funded by $48,210.40 of Section 42 funds obtained in the development of 106-108 Holland Park Avenue for the purpose of forwarding funds to Toronto Parks Forestry and Recreation for capital improvements to the grounds at Wadsworth Park, and more specifically for new park benches and upgrading of playground equipment to be installed in the spring.

Summary

This Motion seeks to support the community at St. Clair/ Davenport and Old Weston Road by providing new park benches as part of the overall improvement to Wadsworth Park. This park serves a large catchment area and is an integral part of the community and the current benches are very old, beyond repair, unsightly and uncomfortable and are in dire need of being replaced.

 

Section 42 funds in the amount of $48,210.40 has been secured and received in the development at 106-108 Holland Park Avenue. This Motion proposes to provide a total of $48,210.40 to Parks Forestry and Recreation towards the cost of new park benches and an upgrade to playground equipment to be installed in the spring at Wadsworth Park.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.32)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71318.pdf
(July 9, 2014) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71440.pdf

MM54.33 - 88 Sunrise Avenue and 22 Hobson Avenue - OMB Appeal - by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor James Maloney

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
34 - Don Valley East
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, seconded by Councillor James Maloney, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City Planning Staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to the application in its present form.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to negotiate with the applicant, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor, to achieve reductions in the overall scale of the proposal and/or to secure conditions of approval in order to mitigate the impacts of the proposal on neighbouring properties.

Summary

The Islamic Community of Afghans in Canada made an application to the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel in order to allow the construction of a new place of worship with ancillary uses at 88 Sunrise Avenue, and to allow the existing building at 22 Hobson Avenue to be converted to a community centre once the existing place of worship is relocated. Variances are required to the zoning by-law because a place of worship is already located on the block, and in order to locate a place of worship within 500 metres of another place of worship.

 

Planning staff recommended refusal of the application as it does not meet the intent of either the Official Plan or the applicable zoning by-law. The application was refused on May 28, 2014 (file number A302/14NY) and has subsequently been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board by the applicant. A hearing has not yet been scheduled.

 

Safety and parking concerns have been raised by a neighbouring property owner. These concerns have not been satisfactorily addressed by the applicant.  

 

The local Ward Councillor is requesting that City Legal and City Planning Staff attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the application in its present form, and to negotiate with the applicant in order to achieve reductions in the overall scale of the proposal, and/or to secure conditions of approval that would mitigate the impacts of the proposal on neighbouring properties.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.33)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.33
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71343.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 88 Sunrise Avenue and 22 Hobson Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71452.pdf

MM54.34 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds to Parks Forestry and Recreation for the purpose of improving S.A.D.R.A. Park in the St. Clair and Old Weston Road- by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
17 - Davenport
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the approved 2014 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $30,445.11 gross, $0 net, fully funded by $30,445.11  of Section 42 funds obtained in the development at 475 Rogers Road for the purpose of capital improvements at S.A.D.R.A.  Park in the St. Clair and Old Weston Road area, more specifically, an outdoor fitness equipment and recreational amenities for children.

Summary

This Motion seeks to support ongoing community improvements by adding some desperately needed amenities in this part of Ward 17.

 

This community has banded together to drive away drug dealing and other illegal activity from the park and adding some basic amenities to increase the use of the park by local residents will act as a deterrent to illegal activities and allow children and families to enjoy the  green space.

 

Section 42 funds in the amount of $ 30,445.11 has been secured and received in the development at 475 Rogers Road. This Motion proposes to provide a total of $30,445.11 to Parks Forestry and Recreation towards the cost of adding some desperately needed amenities in this Park.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.34)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.34
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71329.pdf

MM54.35 - Application for Part Lot Control Exemption - 486 Lytton Boulevard and 2675-2681 Bathurst Street - by Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Bill 711 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor Josh Colle, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the following Recommendations in the report (June 30, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning:

 

1.         City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 486 Lytton Blvd and 2675 – 2681 Bathurst St as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to report dated  June 30, 2014, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.

 

2.         The seven lots that will be subject to Part Lot Control are part of Lots 105 and 127, and part of Block B on Plan 1611 designated as Parts 2 through 8 on Plan 66R-26203.

 

3.         City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.

 

5.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.

 

6.         Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or mortgage any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or her designate.

 

7.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title after confirmation that an easement over a portion of the lot described as Part of Lot 127 and Part of Block B, Plan 1611, designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-26203, for purposes of the maintenance of the storm water sewer running from the common elements roadway across these lands to connect into the storm water outflow on Bathurst Street, is transferred to the common element condominium corporation.

Summary

An application was submitted to the City on March 19, 2014, to lift part-lot control for part of the lands municipally known as 486 Lytton Boulevard and 2675-2681 Bathurst Street to permit seven remaining lots to be conveyed as freehold lots.  The lands were previously exempt from part-lot control under By-law No. 97-2012, and two of the nine proposed townhouse lots were conveyed to the public. This By-law expired on January 17, 2014.

 

The current application to lift part lot control is required to permit the remaining lots to be conveyed.  Presently, members of the public that have entered into agreements of purchase and sale for the transfer of some of the lots are living in the dwellings as tenants.  Closing dates have passed and there is urgency on having the transfers occur as soon as possible.

 

A report from the Chief Planner, Executive Director, City Planning Division dated June 30, 2014, has been prepared recommending approval of the part lot control exemption application once certain conditions are satisfied.

 

This matter is deemed urgent as closing dates for the sales of some of the lots to the general public have passed.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.35) 

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.35
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71325.pdf
(June 30, 2014) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Part Lot Control Exemption Application - 486 Lytton Boulevard and 2657-2681 Bathurst Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71326.pdf

MM54.36 - 625, 629 and 637 Yonge Street and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Isabella Street - Request for directions regarding the July 24, 2014 Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.                  City Council adopt the following recommendations in the report (July 8, 2014) from the City Solicitor.

 

1.         City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1.

 

2.         City Council authorize the public release of Recommendations No.1 and No. 2 as well as Appendix "1" of the confidential Attachment 1, if adopted by Council, the remainder of Attachment 1 to remain confidential as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and information regarding pending litigation before the Ontario Municipal Board.

Summary

The owner of the site has appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board from Council's failure to make a decision on the owner's zoning application to permit redevelopment of the site with a mixed-use 40-storey building.

 

The Ontario Municipal Board had previously scheduled a two-week hearing commencing on July 14, 2014, but this was deferred and a second pre-hearing set for July 24, 2014, at which time the Ontario Municipal Board expects to be informed as to the City's position.

 

Discussions between staff and the applicant have now resulted in the City Solicitor submitting a report dated July 8, 2014, seeking directions for the July 24, 2014, Ontario Municipal Board pre-hearing.  As this matter is therefore urgent, requiring immediate litigation instructions, it should be considered by City Council at its July 8 and 9, 2014, meeting.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.36)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.36
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71355.pdf
(July 8, 2014) Report from the City Solicitor on 625, 629 and 637 Yonge Street and 1, 3, 5, 7 and 9 Isabella Street - Request for directions regarding the July 24, 2014 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71356.pdf
Attachment 1 - Confidential Information
Appendix 1 - Confidential Communication dated July 4, 2014 - made public on July 21, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71358.pdf

MM54.37 - Protecting Toronto's Tree Canopy on Business and Multi-Residential Lands - by Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to consider when the Private Tree By-law is next reviewed for potential revisions, the requirement that businesses, industrial locations, institutions and multi-residential properties not be included in the exception categories under the By-law, thus requiring permits and replanting when dead and dying trees are removed. 

Summary

Although Toronto's private tree by-law has been effective in protecting Toronto's tree canopy, it does not protect trees that are dying or dead on business or multi-residential lands by requiring the owners to replant or replace.

 

Future revisions of the by-law should consider how to improve protecting this important part of Toronto's tree canopy.

 

This Motion is urgent as staff have already begun the review of the Private Tree By-law.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.37)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.37
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71362.pdf

MM54.38 - Liquor Licence - 33 Gladstone Avenue - The Coachouse - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for The Coachouse, 33 Gladstone Avenue (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter. 

Summary

The applicants have submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 33 Gladstone Avenue operating under the name The Coachouse (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for an indoor capacity of about 60 patrons and an outdoor capacity of about 40 patrons.

 

The Premises is located in an area with a large concentration of licenced establishments. There is concern in the community that this new establishment will cause noise and other disturbances to residents in the area. If conditions are put in place, these concerns may be mitigated.  As such, this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.38)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.38
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71360.pdf

MM54.39 - Expression of Support for naming of the New Park Feature at Dufferin Grove Park as the "Jenna K. Morrison Reflexology Footpath" - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded Councillor Mike Layton

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council express its support for the naming of the new park feature at Dufferin Grove Park the "Jenna K. Morrison Reflexology Footpath".

Summary

This project was originally conceived as a way to recognize the life of Jenna K. Morrison, a community member who passed suddenly and tragically. The footpath is a means of recognizing her community contribution while also providing a permanent park amenity for all Toronto residents to enjoy.

 

This park feature, which is currently under construction, is scheduled for completion prior to the end of the July, 2014. 

 

This Motion is urgent as the family and friends of Jenna K. Morrison and the local community have requested that the park feature opening take place on July 26th.
 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.39)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.39
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71361.pdf

MM54.40 - Sony Centre for the Performing Arts, Heritage Easement Agreement Upgrades - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City to add the Heritage Easement Agreement upgrade to restore the sidewalk/pavers on the exterior of the Sony Centre for the Performing Arts by the end of September 2014, in an amount not to exceed $0.740 million net of HST recoveries, to the scope of work to be performed by Ferncastle (Front Street) Inc. on behalf of the City, inclusive of all related costs including obtaining a minimum of three quotes for all sub-contract work.

 

2.         City Council direct the City Solicitor and City officials to take whatever steps are necessary to implement Recommendation 1, including the entering into of agreements on terms and conditions satisfactory to the City Manager, or his designate, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

Summary

In October 2013, by adoption of agenda item EX34.17, City Council approved the addition of a project entitled "Sony Centre Public Plaza" for $1.0 million in the Sony Centre's 2013 Approved Capital Budget funded by $0.7 million from the developer known as Ferncastle (Front Street) Inc. (the "Developer") and $0.3 million from development charge funds designated for civic improvements.  This work is to be completed as part of the remaining work to be done on the Developer's adjacent condominium.

 

http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewAgendaItemHistory.do?item=2013.EX34.17

 

In January 2014, City Council approved the 2014 Capital Budget for the Sony Centre including $1.205 million for Heritage Easement Agreement upgrades to the Sony Centre's exterior, including:

 

a.         Exterior limestone and granite cladding upgrades to be phased in over two years.

b.         Sidewalk/pavers restoration repairs.

c.         Restoration of the east side exterior and grounds to its original state after removing the temporary dressing rooms.

 

Given that the Developer for the Public Plaza project is already on site, adding the restoration repairs for sidewalk/pavers (i.e. Part "b" above) to the scope of work to be completed for the Public Plaza, including obtaining a minimum of three quotations for all sub-contract work by the Developer, is a cost effective way of ensuring the required restoration of sidewalk/pavers is completed by the end of September 2014.  This will ensure that the balance of the construction work is completed in advance of the Pan Am Games, and in order to reduce any impact to Sony Centre operations.

 

City of Toronto Facilities staff will be providing oversight and contract management services for the Sony Theatre.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8 and 9, 2014 as MM54.40)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.40
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71363.pdf

MM54.41 - Midland/Lawrence Toronto District School Board/Toronto Lands Corporation applications (Rezoning and Subdivison Applications No. 13 218652 ESC 37 OZ and 13 218659 ESC 37 SB and Site Plan Application 13 189360 ESC 37 SA) - by Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Michael Thompson, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to undertake further consultations with the local community with regards to the current Toronto District School Board/Toronto Lands Corporation planning applications on file, noted below, and report to the Scarborough Community Council in 2015 on the results of the community consultations  prior to proceeding with site plan approval for the new secondary school and prior to scheduling a Statutory Public Meeting for the proposed residential subdivision on the Bendale Business and Technical Institute school site.

Summary

Toronto District School Board (TDSB) and Toronto Lands Corporation (TLC) staff advised City staff on May 6, 2014 that the French Public School Board is no longer interested in purchasing the David and Mary Thomson school site which was declared surplus by the TDSB.

 

This decision will affect TDSB's overall masterplan for their lands in the northwest quadrant of Midland and Lawrence which includes a proposed residential subdivision and new secondary school.

 

City staff have been advised by TDSB/TLC staff that they still intend to proceed with the proposed new Secondary School on an extension of Brockley Drive and the proposed residential subdivision on the Bendale Business and Technical Institute school site.

 

City staff have been advised by TDSB/TLC staff that with regards to the David and Mary Thomson school site, the TDSB/TLC now plan to place the school lands on the open market where a developer is likely to purchase the site and propose another residential subdivision.

 

The current zoning on the property does not permit residential development, and if a residential subdivision is proposed, rezoning and subdivision applications will be required which will trigger a full community consultation process.

 

Further community consultation with the local community is warranted regarding the overall masterplan for the Midland/Lawrence TDSB lands given the uncertainty of the future land use of the David and Mary Thomson school site.

 

This motion is urgent because the Toronto Lands Corporation will be putting the David and Mary Thomson School site up for public sale which would deviate from the original plans presented to the community and would negatively impact the surrounding community. The Toronto Lands Corporation has proposed that an additional 370 to 400 stacked townhouses be built on this site without consulting the community and providing an opportunity to discuss the proposal. It is imperative that additional community consultation take place.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014 as MM54.41)

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM54.41
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71381.pdf

MM54.42 - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Variance Decision and Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 7 Chilton Road - by Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mary Fragedakis, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment Decision in Application A0471/14TEY respecting 7 Chilton Road.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board Appeal of File No. A0471/14TEY to refuse the variances or reduce the impact of the requested variances, and to retain an outside land use planner, if necessary.

Summary

The applicant has applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A0471/14TEY) for minor variances from Zoning By-law 6752 and 569-2013 to alter the existing one-storey detached dwelling by constructing a second floor addition over the existing structure, a rear two-storey addition and a rear deck.

 

The Application was approved by the Committee of Adjustment on Wednesday July 9, 2014 (the "Decision").

 

The subject property is located on the east side of Chilton Road just south of O'Connor Drive. The property is designated "Neighbourhoods" in the Official Plan, and is zoned R1C Residential in Zoning By-law 6752 of the former Borough of East York RD (f6.0; a185; d0.75) in Zoning By-law 569-2013 of the City of Toronto.

 

There is concern about the massing and siting of the proposed addition, particularly its impact to the side and rear yards of adjacent neighbours as well as the overall size of the dwelling.

 

Planning staff did not comment on this application. Planning staff can play a role in facilitating meetings between the neighbours and the applicant in the hopes of reaching a settlement. An outside land use planner would be retained if necessary.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Decision and attend the OMB hearing in order to refuse or reduce the impact of the requested variances and to retain an outside land use planner, if necessary.

 

This Motion is urgent as the deadline for appeal to the Ontario Municipal Board is July 29, 2014, which is before the next City Council meeting.

 

(Submitted to City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014 as MM54.42)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.42
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71410.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision on Application for Minor Variance/Permission for 7 Chilton Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71412.pdf
Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Public Hearing Notice on Application for Minor Variance/Permission for 7 Chilton Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71413.pdf

MM54.43 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to Toronto District School Board for the Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Accessible Playground - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, recommends that:

 

1.         City Council increase the 2014 Operating Budget for Non-Program by $300,000 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits related to 111 St. Clair Ave. West (source account: 220096) to provide one-time funding of $300,000.00 to the Toronto District School Board for Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School Accessible Playground Project.

 

2.         City Council  direct that the $300,000 be forwarded to the Toronto District School Board once the Toronto District School Board signs an Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the reporting requirements and the maintenance of reasonable public access to the improved portion of the school grounds.

Summary

Section 37 funds have been secured and received in the development at 11 St. Clair Ave. West for local parkland.

 

Deer Park was one of the many schools that had their wooden play structures removed a decade ago. Unfortunately, a comprehensive playground has not been constructed to take its place. The few play apparatus' on site are inadequate for the special needs students at the school and in the wider community. This motion seeks to support the Deer Park Junior and Senior Public School toward their initiative to construct a new accessible playground.

 

In the absence of a City playground, the Deer Park school grounds serve that purpose for the wider community. The Section 37 Implementation Guidelines (section 5.7) approved by Council in 2007 states:

 

"Cash contributions toward the capital improvement of school board playgrounds are eligible S.37 community benefits where the playground serves as a local park, where the public will continue to have reasonable access for the foreseeable future, and where there is no local City-owned parkland performing a similar function in the same community that could otherwise benefit from the cash contribution."

 

The Undertaking to be signed by the Toronto District School Board will continue provisions governing the purpose of the funds as well as the financial reporting requirements. A separate Community Access Agreement will be executed between the City and the Toronto District School Board, drawn up in consultation with the local Councillor and the community.

(Submitted to City Council on July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014 as MM54.43)

Background Information

Member Motion MM54.43
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-71384.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 54

BL54.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact general bills and confirming bills.

Background Information

(July 14, 2014) Consolidated By-law Index for July 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2014 City Council meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2014/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-71267.htm
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council