City Council

Meeting No.:
5
Contact:
Marilyn Toft, Manager
Meeting Date:
Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Wednesday, April 1, 2015

Thursday, April 2, 2015

Phone:
416-392-7032
Start Time:
9:30 AM
E-mail:
clerk@toronto.ca
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall

The Agenda and related materials for this meeting are enclosed. The details of the meeting are noted at the top of the Agenda.

 

Members of Council and Staff: Please keep this agenda and the accompanying material until the City Council meeting dealing with these matters has ended. The City Clerk’s Office will not provide additional copies.

 

Notice to People Writing to Council: The City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the City of Toronto Municipal Code authorize the City of Toronto to collect any personal information in your communication or presentation to City Council or its committees.

 

The City collects this information to enable it to make informed decisions on the relevant issue(s). If you are submitting letters, faxes, e-mails, presentations or other communications to the City, you should be aware that your name and the fact that you communicated with the City will become part of the public record and will appear on the City’s website. The City will also make your communication and any personal information in it – such as your postal address, telephone number or e-mail address – available to the public, unless you expressly request the City to remove it.

 

The City video records Council, committee and community council meetings. If you make a presentation to a committee or community council, the City will be video recording you and City staff may make the video recordings available to the public. If you want to learn more about why and how the City collects your information, write to the City Clerk's Office, City Hall, 100 Queen Street West, Toronto ON M5H 2N2 or call 416-392-7032.

 

Closed Meeting Requirements: If Council wants to meet in closed session (privately), a member of Council must make a motion to do so and give the reason why Council has to meet privately (City of Toronto Act, 2006).

 

March 26, 2015


toronto.ca/council

This agenda and any supplementary materials submitted to the City Clerk can be found online at www.toronto.ca/council. Visit the website for access to all agendas, reports, decisions and minutes of City Council and its committees.

Routine Matters - Meeting 5

RM5.1 - Call to Order

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All
Attention
Council has voted to consider the following items at specific times:

Thursday April 2, 2015:
First item: CC5.8 - Integrity Commissioner Report on Violation of Code of Conduct: Then-Mayor Rob Ford
Second item: AU1.7 - Operational Review of Build Toronto Inc.
Third item: CD2.1 - Toronto Fire Services - 2015 to 2019 Master Fire Plan
Fourth item: CD2.2 - Infrastructure and Service Improvement Plan for the Emergency Shelter System

At 2:00 pm, Thursday April 2:
CC5.11 - Court Decision regarding Municipal Code Chapter 545 Article VIII, Owners and Drivers of Taxicabs

Summary

• O Canada
• Moment of Silence
• Declarations of Interest under the Municipal Conflict of Interest Act

Background Information

Condolence Motion for Carley Elle Allison
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78796.pdf
Condolence Motion for Susan Margaret Campbell
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78789.pdf
Condolence Motion for John Docherty
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78790.pdf
Condolence Motion for John W. Eleen
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78791.pdf
Condolence Motion for Vincenzo Gasparro
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78792.pdf
Condolence Motion for Elizabeth (Libby) Hancocks
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78793.pdf
Condolence Motion for Donna Meldrum
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78794.pdf
Condolence Motion for Lisa Shamai
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78795.pdf

RM5.2 - Confirmation of Minutes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will confirm the Minutes from the regular meeting held on February 10 and 11, 2015, and the special meeting held on March 10 and 11, 2015.

RM5.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from City Officials

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

Report of the Executive Committee from Meeting 4 on March 25, 2015

Submitted by Mayor John Tory, Chair

 

Report of the Audit Committee from Meeting 1 on February 27, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Chin Lee, Chair

 

Report of the Civic Appointments Committee from Meeting 4 on March 12, 2015

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Community Development and Recreation Committee from Meeting 2 on March 23, 2015

Submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Chair

 

Report of the Economic Development Committee from Meeting 2 on February 26, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair

 

Report of the Government Management Committee from Meeting 2 on February 17, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Paul Ainslie, Chair

 

Report of the Parks and Environment Committee from Meeting 2 on February 25, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, Chair

 

Report of the Planning and Growth Management Committee from Meeting 2 on February 24, 2015

Submitted by Councillor David Shiner, Chair

 

Report of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee from Meeting 2 on February 23, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Jaye Robinson, Chair

 

Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 3 on March 9, 2015

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Striking Committee from Meeting 4 on March 23, 2015

Submitted by Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong, Chair

 

Report of the Etobicoke York Community Council from Meeting 4 on February 18, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Mark Grimes, Chair

 

Report of the North York Community Council from Meeting 4 on February 18, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Maria Augimeri, Chair

 

Report of the Scarborough Community Council from Meeting 4 on February 18, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Chin Lee, Chair

 

Report of the Toronto and East York Community Council from Meeting 4 on February 18, 2015

Submitted by Councillor Mike Layton, Chair

 

New Business submitted by City Officials

 

RM5.4 - Petitions

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All

Summary

Members of Council may file petitions.

RM5.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements

Consideration Type:
Presentation
Wards:
All

Summary

Various presentations and announcements will be made at the City Council meeting.

Background Information

(April 1, 2015) "Toronto: Greatness and Panam" - A poem by Toronto's Poet Laureate, George Elliott Clarke
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78723.pdf

RM5.6 - Review of the Order Paper

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will review the Order Paper.

Background Information

Order Paper March 31, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78751.pdf
Order Paper April 1, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78752.pdf
Order Paper April 2, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78757.pdf

Administrative Inquiry - Meeting 5

IA5.1 - Strategy to Underground Hydro Wires

Consideration Type:
Information
Wards:
All
Attention
The City Manager has submitted an Answer to the Administrative Inquiry (IA5.1a).

Under Council's Procedures, City Council can receive or refer an Administrative Inquiry, without debate.

Summary

Councillor Joe Mihevc has submitted the following Administrative Inquiry:

 

"In 2014, Council approved a direction to request the City Manager to work on a report with Toronto Hydro on a strategy to underground hydro wires.

 

I request a status report on this work. I note that the black-outs of early March 2015 could have been avoided had the hydro system, or key pieces of it, been undergrounded.

 

My request is an update on where this report is at and specifically, when it will be coming to Council for debate and discussion in the new term."

Background Information

(March 6, 2015) Administrative Inquiry from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's, on Strategy to Underground Hydro Wires (IA5.1 )
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-78272.pdf
(March 27, 2015) Answer to Administraive Inquiry from the City Manager (IA5.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-78646.pdf

Executive Committee - Meeting 4

EX4.1 - Amendment to the Fixed Terms of the Ombudsman and Lobbyist Registrar Functions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Adoption of this Item requires 30 votes.

Communication EX4.1.1 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council amend Article IV, Section 3-24 of the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers to change the term of the Lobbyist Registrar to a seven (7) year non-renewable term.

 

2. City Council amend Article V, Section 3-28 of the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers to change the term of the Ombudsman to a seven (7) year non-renewable term.

 

3. City Council direct that the term changes for the Ombudsman and Lobbyist Registrar come into effect for future Ombudsman and Lobbyist Registrar appointments.

Origin

(March 10, 2015) Report from the City Manager

Summary

This report recommends amending the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers to provide a non-renewable fixed seven (7) year term for the Ombudsman and Lobbyist Registrar function.  A non-renewable term is consistent with what is already in place for Toronto's Auditor General and Integrity Commissioner. 

 

The terms of the Ombudsman and Lobbyist Registrar are currently five (5) years, renewable once for an additional five (5) years.  The recommended term amendments will come into effect with future Ombudsman and Lobbyist Registrar appointments.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 10, 2015) Report from the City Manager on Amendment to the Fixed Terms of the Ombudsman and Lobbyist Registrar Functions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77955.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Jim Karygiannis

Communications (City Council)

(March 26, 2015) E-mail from Peter Clarke (CC.Supp.EX4.1.1)

EX4.3 - Transmittal of the Report on the Identification, Removal and Prevention of Barriers to Accessibility in the 2014 Municipal Election

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (March 11, 2015) from the City Clerk for information.

Origin

(March 11, 2015) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

In accordance with subsection 12.1(2) of the Municipal Elections Act, 1996, as amended (MEA), the City Clerk has prepared a report about the identification, removal and prevention of barriers that affect electors and candidates with disabilities.  The attached report identifies the various initiatives undertaken by the City Clerk for the 2014 election as well as the outcomes and actions moving forward.

 

Members of the accessibility community made extraordinary contributions to the 2014 Election.  Their willingness to share their time and expertise allowed the Clerk and staff to gain a far deeper understanding of the issues and barriers faced by persons with disabilities.  The Clerk will continue to work closely with the Accessibility Outreach Network, the Disability Issues Committee and persons with disabilities to identify, remove and prevent barriers for future elections.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 11, 2015) Report from the City Clerk on Transmittal of the Report on the Identification, Removal and Prevention of Barriers to Accessibility in the 2014 Municipal Election
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77941.pdf
Appendix A - 2014 Municipal Election Report on Accessibility
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77942.pdf

EX4.4 - Schools as Community Assets - A Policy Agenda for the City-School Boards Advisory Committee

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 
1.  City Council direct the City-School Boards Advisory Council to prioritize in its 2015-2016 work plan, the development of a new multilateral, consultative relationship for the City of Toronto, the School Boards and the Province of Ontario with respect to schools lands disposition that: 


a.  takes into consideration the full value of schools as community assets, in addition to their value as educational institutions;

 

b.  provides a viable framework for retaining public ownership of former school properties when there is agreement among the parties that the site should be retained; and

 

c.  identifies alternative funding sources beyond municipal funding to keep schools as community assets.

 

2.  City Council direct the City-School Boards Advisory Council to report back to Executive Committee on these issues by the fourth quarter of 2015.

 

3.  City Council request the Province and the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) to engage the City of Toronto as a strategic partner in the 2014-2016 studies of potential school sales and closures.

 

4.  City Council direct the Acting Deputy City Manager, Cluster A to report to the City-School Boards Advisory Committee, as part of its 2015-2016 Workplan:

 

a.  with a site location map that shows proximity of schools with utilization rates of 65 percent or lower to the nearest subject or replacement school, and the ability to locate an existing day care centre in any and all new destination neighbourhood schools;

 

b.  on potential restitution or compensation options to the City of Toronto for capital investments made in such schools subject to disposition, including, but not restricted to, day care centres, pools, playground improvements and reading gardens; and

 

c. on school catchment and bussing policies and whether such can be amended to build capacity and increase enrollment in schools with low utilization rates.

Origin

(March 10, 2015) Report from the Acting Deputy City Manager, Cluster A

Summary

This report clarifies the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) ten year plan for school closures and summarizes the implications of this plan in light of the City's fourfold interest in schools as community assets:

 

1.      schools as spaces for child care and early learning;

2.      school lands as green space;

3.      schools as sites for non-educational services and programming; and

4.      schools to serve growth areas.

 

The report recommends that the City pursue a new multilateral relationship with the School Boards and the Province of Ontario in relation to the disposition of school board properties in Toronto, in order to realize and retain the value of schools as community assets. The new City-School Boards Advisory Committee, approved by Toronto City Council at its February 2015 meeting, is the appropriate body to investigate and recommend options for this process.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 10, 2015) Report from the Acting Deputy City Manager, Cluster A on Schools as Community Assets - A Policy Agenda for the City-School Boards Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77897.pdf
Appendix A - Summary Statistics on Municipal Interests in Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Schools under Review/ Proposed for Closure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77898.pdf
Appendix B - Table 1 - Municipal interests in "Consideration for Sale" Sites: Toronto Lands Corporation (TLC) Properties identified for potential sale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77899.pdf
Appendix C - Map 1 - Municipal Interests in "Consideration for Sale" sites: Toronto Lands Corporation (TLC) Properties Identified for Potential Sale
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77960.pdf
Appendix D - Table 2 and 2a: Municipal Interests in "Review for Closure" Sites: Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Schools identified for Pupil Accommodation Reviews and Non-Educational Uses at "Review for Closure" Sites
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77961.pdf
Appendix E - Map 2 - Municipal Interests in "Review for Closure" Sites: Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Schools Identified for Pupil Accommodation Reviews
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77962.pdf
Appendix F - List of 130 Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Schools with 2014 Utilization Rates of 65% or Lower, listed by Utilization Rate
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77963.pdf
Appendix G - Divisional Comments on Toronto District School Board (TDSB) Potential School Closures: Children's Services Division, City Planning; Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77964.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(March 20, 2015) Letter from Marilyn E. Schafer, Chair, Older Women's Network (EX.Supp.EX4.4.1)

EX4.6 - The Weston Community / Cultural Hub - Next Steps

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve the preliminary funding model for the Community/Cultural Hub and the Live/Work Units as set out in the Financial Impact section of the report (March 11, 2015) from the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, based on plans to be submitted to the City's Planning Department by the Rockport Group for the market rental building.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to co-ordinate the negotiation of the agreements and security required to proceed with the Hub, Live/Work Units and Open Space Area, in consultation with relevant City divisions, the Toronto Parking Authority, the Rockport Group, Woodbourne Capital Management and Toronto Artscape Inc.

 

3.  City Council authorize the designation of Toronto Artscape Inc. as the operator/leaseholder of the proposed 26 Live/Work Units, conditional upon:


a.  Toronto Artscape Inc. providing a finalized business case and lease that confirms the viability of the Live/Work Units, satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office; and

 

b.  City Council granting final planning approval for the Development.
 

4.  City Council authorize the designation of Toronto Artscape Inc. as the operator/leaseholder and manager of the proposed Community/Cultural Hub and the Open Space Area, subject to the following conditions:

 
a.  Toronto Artscape Inc. providing a finalized business case and lease that confirms the viability of the Community/Cultural Hub and Open Space Area, satisfactory to the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture; and

 

b.  City Council granting final planning approval for the Development and final approval of the Funding Model.

 
5.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to expedite the planning review process once the Rockport Group has made the necessary planning applications.

 

6.  City Council direct that, should the developer not be able to obtain above grade permits and commence construction of the new apartment building by the end of July 2016 and the developer is not willing to extend the fixed price term beyond that period, the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A report through Executive Committee to City Council on whether to proceed with the Proposal, and if so, the source of funds required.

 

7.  City Council direct the Director, Affordable Housing Office, in consultation with relevant Divisions, to report through Executive Committee to City Council on the final funding and program for the Community/Cultural Hub, the Live/Work Units and the Open Space Area required for final approval, when Council considers the land use approvals for the overall project.

Origin

(March 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

In August 2014, City Council directed staff to conduct due diligence on an innovative proposal (the "Proposal") to support the revitalization of the Weston community.  The Proposal includes the creation of an approximately 800-square meter community/cultural hub (the "Hub"), 26 affordable rental housing live/work units (the "Live/Work Units) for artists and an approximately 1,150 square meter "Open Space Area" to continue the Weston Farmers' Market and other community uses. This is to be built in conjunction with a purpose built market rental building comprised of approximately 350 units (collectively "the Development"). Council directed staff to report in early 2015 on City and third-party funding and other resources required to proceed.

 

The Proposal made by 22 John Street Developments Inc. (a Rockport Group company) to the Toronto Parking Authority (TPA), has the Development being located on the surplus City-owned TPA surface parking lot at 22 John Street, together with vacant space in the base of the adjacent rental high-rise building at 33 King Street. A new, approximately 75-space TPA replacement parking lot will serve local businesses and the community. Artscape will be the eventual leaseholder operator of the Community/Cultural Hub and 26 Live/Work Units.

The Weston community has been identified as one of the City's 31 Neighbourhood Improvement Areas (NIAs), with unemployment at a higher rate than the city average and a lack of affordable housing. The proposed multi-million dollar investment in the Development will create some 940 new jobs, which, together with the local expansion of public transit by Metrolinx and GO Transit will contribute to an area-wide social and economic revitalization.

 

Since August, staff from various City Divisions, led by the Affordable Housing Office, have worked with the TPA, the Rockport Group and its development participants, Woodbourne Capital Management and Toronto Artscape Inc. ("Artscape"), in conducting further due diligence on the unique funding and program model proposed. As a result of this work, additional refinements have been made to the overall proposal. The cost to build the Community/Cultural Hub, Live/Work Units and Open Space Area is projected to be $13.3 million, including an operating reserve.

 

This report recommends that Council approve the proposed preliminary funding model and program, conditional on the completion of on-going due diligence.

 

Council approval of the recommendations in this report will trigger the filing of planning applications by 22 John Street Developments Inc. and enable the next phase of due diligence by City staff.

 

The expectation of the parties is that by the end of this year or early in 2016 staff will have completed their due diligence on the Development. This will include determining what legal agreements will be necessary, and their content, based on the outcome of planning approvals. Staff will then be in a position to report on the proposed planning approvals, the overall program, and the final funding and proposal details which are set out in a preliminary fashion in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 11, 2015) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on The Weston Community/Cultural Hub - Next Steps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77951.pdf

Speakers

Laura Alerson, Vice Chair, Weston Village Residents Association
Jack Winberg/ Celia Smith, Rockport/Artscape
Councillor Frances Nunziata

EX4.7 - Housing Opportunities Toronto 2010-2020 - Five Year Review

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication EX4.7.1 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council again affirm its position that the Federal government re-invest the savings arising from the expiration of current agreements back into social housing.

 

2.  City Council request the Province to increase the amount of supportive housing for persons with mental health and addiction issues and other disabilities.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee:

 

1.  Authorized the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to form an interdivisional steering committee including, but not limited to: City Planning, Toronto Public Health, Long Term Care Homes and Services, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Corporate Finance, and Social Development, Finance and Administration, to oversee and advise on the review and update of the City's Housing Opportunities Toronto: Affordable Housing Action Plan 2010 – 2020.

2.  Authorized the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to execute the work plan outlined in the Comments section of the report (February 19, 2015) from the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, including strategic public consultations, and to make recommendations to the Affordable Housing Committee, Executive and City Council in early 2016 to update the Housing Action Plan.

 

3. Requested the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to include in the 2016 report the most current data, with analysis, on income, poverty and housing affordability in Toronto including, but not limited to, median annual household income, home prices and income requirements to purchase a home, the percentage of households in poverty and core housing need, vacancy rates and average market rents. Also to be included in the report is data for the City of Toronto on:


- homelessness (including the number of people living on the streets and using shelters);
- the number of households on the social housing waiting list; and

- the annual number of new affordable housing units completed each year from 2010-2015.

 

4. Requested the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to review the federal report entitled "In From the Margins: A Call to Action on Poverty, Housing and Homelessness", prepared for the Senate Subcommittee on Cities by Senators Art Eggleton and Hugh Segal, to see if there are any relevant additional recommendations which can be added to the Housing Action Plan.

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee

Summary

This report seeks the approval of the Executive Committee and the Affordable Housing Committee to proceed with a strategic updating of Housing Opportunities Toronto – An Affordable Housing Action Plan 2010-2020 (HOT). This includes approval of the work plan outlined in this report, which provides for the release of a five-year report card on progress to date, a targeted public consultation process, and a report to Council in early 2016 on proposed changes to update the 10-year action plan.

 

City Council approved HOT and its 67 proposed actions in 2009. In its first five years the housing action plan has served the City well.  It has provided a City-wide blueprint for actions and guided the work of the many Divisions and agencies that have a role in delivering housing and homeless programs and policies. While federal/provincial investments in housing and homeless services have been made during the first five years of the Action Plan, they have fallen short of meeting needs.  In this regard, the Action Plan will require the federal and provincial governments to step up, rather than step back from, providing sufficient sustainable funding for the City's efforts to be successful.

 

The five-year review will incorporate work underway or planned in other divisions that have an impact on the City's housing and homelessness policies and programming.

 

The review and update of Housing Opportunities Toronto will also satisfy the provincial requirement under the Housing Services Act to conduct a five-year update and begin reporting annually on progress. The Province has also requested that the City look to identify actions to address housing issues affecting victims of domestic violence, as well work with the Province to develop additional performance measures.

 

An interdivisional steering committee, co-chaired by the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, will direct the three phases of the review.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on Housing Opportunities Toronto 2010-2020 - Five Year Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77943.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office and the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Housing Opportunities Toronto 2010-2020 Five Year Review
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77989.pdf
Attachment 1 - Housing Opportunities Toronto - An Affordable Housing Action Plan 2010-2020
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77990.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(March 26, 2015) E-mail from Peter Clarke (CC.Supp.EX4.7.1)

EX4.8 - Providing a Property Tax Exemption for New Transitional Housing for Young Victims of Sexual Exploitation and Human Trafficking

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:


1.  City Council exempt from taxation for municipal and school purposes, Toronto Community Housing Corporation, for the non-profit development at the location contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (February 19, 2015) from the Director, Affordable Housing Office, for 15 years.

 

2.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, on behalf of the City, to enter into a municipal capital facility agreement with Toronto Community Housing Corporation, on terms and conditions acceptable to the City Solicitor, to secure the ongoing affordability of the units being exempted from taxation.

 

3.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, on behalf of the City to negotiate and enter into any amendments to or discharges or postponements of the municipal capital facility agreement, the City's security and any other documents or agreements required to enact this tax exemption on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.
 
4.  City Council cancel or refund any taxes paid from the by-law exempting the property from taxation.

 

5.  City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (February 19, 2015) from the Director, Affordable Housing Office be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor as it pertains to the security of the property of the municipality or local board.

 

6.  City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve a 15-year property tax exemption for a Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC) property to be renovated into transitional housing for young women who are victims of sexual exploitation and human trafficking, (the "Transitional Home").

 

Recognizing the need to protect the safety and security of residents, the property's location is contained in the Confidential Attachment.

          

At its June 10, 11, 12 and 13, 2014 meeting, Council approved financial assistance of up to $0.850 million to Toronto Community Housing Corporation for capital repairs to the property. Renovations are expected to start in early 2015 with occupancy of the eight units in late 2015 or early 2016.

 

A property tax exemption is consistent with City policy. Toronto Community Housing Corporation will be leasing the property to a charitable service agency at a nominal cost. The agency will manage the property and provide support services to assist young women in recovering from their trauma and to move on to more independent housing. These are particularly vulnerable individuals whose housing and social service needs are not being met in Toronto.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on Providing a Property Tax Exemption for New Transitional Housing for Young Victims of Sexual Exploitation and Human Trafficking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77945.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office on Providing a Property Tax Exemption for New Transitional Housing for Young Victims of Sexual Exploitation and Human Trafficking
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77991.pdf
Confidential Attachment

EX4.9 - Providing Property Tax Exemptions for New Affordable Rental Homes in the West Don Lands

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1. City Council exempt from taxation for municipal and school purposes, Wigwamen Incorporated for its non-profit development currently municipally known as 745 Front Street East for 25 years.

2. City Council exempt from taxation for municipal and school purposes, Fred Victor Centre for its non-profit development currently municipally known as 20 Palace Street for 25 years.

3. City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, to enter into the municipal capital facility agreements with Wigwamen Incorporated and Fred Victor Centre to secure the tax exemption, on terms and conditions acceptable to the City Solicitor with Wigwamen Incorporated and Fred Victor.

4. City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office, on behalf of the City, to negotiate and enter into any amendments to or discharges or postponements of the municipal capital facility agreements, the City's securities therefore as well as any other documents or agreements required to enact this tax exemption on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Director, Affordable Housing Office, and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

5. City Council cancel or refund any taxes paid from the by-law exempting the property from taxation.

6. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee

Summary

The City of Toronto has partnered with the province to host the 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Games. The City and its residents will benefit from a number of legacy initiatives, including affordable housing in the West Don Lands.

 

Construction is almost complete for two buildings which will house athletes during the games, this summer. After the games, the buildings will then be retrofitted to provide a total of 253 affordable housing units with occupancy scheduled for the spring of 2016.

 

Two non-profit organizations, Wigwamen Incorporated and Fred Victor Centre, were selected by Infrastructure Ontario in 2012 and received capital funding under a provincial Affordable Housing Program. They also received relief from City development fees and charges.

 

Consistent with City policy, this report recommends that City Council exempt Wigwamen Incorporated and Fred Victor Centre from property taxes for 25 years for the affordable rental housing developments at 745 Front Street East and 20 Palace Street in the West Don Lands. An exemption from property taxes will allow Wigwamen and Fred Victor to offer more affordable rents. Both buildings will have a range of one- to four-bedroom units and will be home to a mix of residents, including people of aboriginal heritage, persons with disabilities, persons with mental health issues, veterans, newcomers and Sports Canada carded athletes.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on Providing Property Tax Exemptions for New Affordable Rental Homes in the West Don Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77946.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office on Providing Property Tax Exemptions for New Affordable Rental Homes in the West Don Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77992.pdf

EX4.10 - Securing Affordable Housing at 10, 11, 25 and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City to enter into an agreement with Habitat for Humanity, Greater Toronto Area, Build Toronto, the developer and any other party deemed necessary, to secure the purchase and financing of the Habitat Units at below market value.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City to be a party to the agreements of purchase and sale contemplated to be entered into for the Habitat Units as a contingent transferee, in order to ensure the benefit of the Habitat Units is secured for the intended purposes, in the event that Habitat for Humanity, Greater Toronto Area or its assignee is not able to complete the transactions.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City to assign its interests in the Habitat Units to another not for profit housing provider, chosen by the Director, Affordable Housing Office to give effect to the intended purpose of the Habitat Units as affordable housing, or to an arm's length purchaser at fair market value if no agreement can be made with a suitable not for profit, on terms and conditions determined by him and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor prior to the closing date with the developer, with the intention that there are no financial consequences to the City having been a party to the agreements of purchase and sale for the Habitat Units.

 

4.  City Council authorize the proceeds of the assignment of an agreement of purchase and sale for a Habitat Unit at fair market value to be paid to the Capital Revolving Reserve Fund for Affordable Housing (XR1058) after payment of all expenses incurred in making the assignment of any of the Habitat Units.

 

5.  City Council approve up to $625,000.00 in financial assistance from the Development Charges Reserve Fund (2009) for Subsidized Housing (XR2116) for Habitat for Humanity, Greater Toronto Area, in the form of a grant by way of forgivable loan for the Habitat Units under the terms of the City's Home Ownership Assistance Program.

 

6.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to provide up to $1,250,000.00 from the federal/provincial Investment in Affordable Housing Program Extension – Homeownership Component, in the form of grants by way of forgivable loans, for down payment assistance loans to lower-income purchasers, on the properties known as 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue.

 

7.  City Council authorize the Director, Affordable Housing Office to negotiate and execute, on behalf of the City, the agreement referred to Recommendation 1 above and the agreements with Habitat for Humanity, Greater Toronto Area to secure the funding referred to in Recommendations 5 and 6 above, as well as any documents, agreements, or security required to give effect to the foregoing on terms and conditions determined by the Director, Affordable Housing Office and in a form approved by the City Solicitor.

 

8.  City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to execute the agreements of purchase and sale for the Habitat Units, together with any documents or agreement relating to an assignment or a re-sale transaction that may occur as a result of entering into that agreement, and to amend and to waive any terms and conditions on behalf of the City, on such terms as she considers reasonable.

 

9.  City Council grant authority to the City Solicitor to execute any documents required to register security for the funding referred to in Recommendations 5 and 6 above and to postpone, confirm the status of, and discharge security, as required by normal business practices.

 

10.  City Council increase the 2015 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) by $1,250,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded from Investment in Affordable Housing Program (IAH), to provide funding for the affordable housing initiatives recommended in the report (February 19, 2015) from the Director, Affordable Housing Office.

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee

Summary

This report recommends an innovative affordable ownership housing initiative between Habitat for Humanity, Greater Toronto Area ("Habitat"), the City of Toronto, and Build Toronto. Twenty-five new affordable ownership homes by Habitat will be secured and funded to provide housing for lower-income Toronto families. The homes will be incorporated into the multi-building condominium development at 10, 11, 25, and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue (the "Ordnance Triangle").

 

10, 11, and 25 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue were surplus City of Toronto properties that were transferred to Build Toronto in 2011. This report seeks authority for the City to enter into an affordable housing agreement with Habitat, Build Toronto, and the developer whereby 25 units will be sold at below market value. Both Build Toronto and the City will provide funding and when combined with Habitat's contributions, the partnership will make the homes affordable to eligible lower-income Toronto families.

 

City funding for the Habitat homes is recommended to come from the federal/provincial Investment in Affordable Housing Program (IAH) and the City of Toronto's Home Ownership Assistance Program (HOAP). Under the IAH guidelines, Habitat is eligible for $50,000 per home in loan funding and the HOAP provides $25,000 per home. If the Habitat family sells the home within 20 years, the loans are repaid to the City with a share of appreciation and the funds go on to help subsequent eligible purchasers.

 

Under the City's affordable housing action plan Housing Opportunities Toronto, 2010-2020 (HOT), Build Toronto sites are prioritized for affordable housing funding and incentives. Affordable home ownership housing is a priority of HOT, which sets a target of 200 new affordable ownership homes annually. This initiative is consistent with the City's previous work with Habitat on small scale affordable housing for families.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on Securing Affordable Housing at 10, 11, 25 and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-78009.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office on Securing Affordable Housing at 10, 11, 25 and 30 Ordnance Street and 45 Strachan Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77993.pdf

EX4.11 - Increasing Affordable Rental Housing in Alexandra Park Through Section 37 Funds

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize the transfer of $782,963 of Section 37 community benefits obtained in the development of 15,17,17R,19,21,27 Beverley Street (Source Account XR3026-3700510) to the Capital Revolving Fund Reserve Fund (XR1058), as per site specific by-law amendments for the lands known as 15,17,17R,19,21,27 Beverley Street.

2.  City Council increase the 2015 Approved Operating Budget for Shelter Support and Housing Administration by $782,963 gross, $0 net, fully funded from the Capital Revolving Fund Reserve Fund (XR1058) for transfer to Toronto Community Housing for the purpose of increasing the amount of affordable rental housing within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Co-operative Revitalization.

3.  City Council direct that these funds be forwarded to Toronto Community Housing (TCH) for the purposes of developing up to six new affordable rental homes in Alexandra Park once Toronto Community Housing has entered into a Contribution Agreement with the City governing the purpose of the funds, the financial reporting requirements, and other conditions satisfactory to the City Solicitor in consultation with the Director, Affordable Housing Office.

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee

Summary

City Council at its meeting of August 25-28, 2014 requested the Director of the Affordable Housing Office, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report to the first Affordable Housing Committee in 2015 on directing secured Section 37 funding for the provision of new affordable rental housing within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Co-op Revitalization in Ward 20.

This report provides details on the Section 37 funds available to increase the amount of affordable rental housing within the Alexandra Park and Atkinson Co-operative Revitalization and recommends that $782,963 in Section 37 funding secured from 15-27 Beverley Street in Ward 20 be allocated to Toronto Community Housing for the creation of new affordable rental housing in Alexandra Park.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Letter from the Affordable Housing Committee on Increasing Affordable Rental Housing in Alexandra Park Through Section 37 Funds
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77947.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Affordable Housing Office on Increasing Affordable Rental Housing in Alexandra Park Through Section 37 Funds
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77994.pdf

EX4.13 - Ticketing of Vehicles During Pick-up and Drop-off of Persons with Disabilities

Consideration Type:
ACTION

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1. City Council request the Toronto Police Service to consider using discretion when issuing parking tickets to vehicles picking up and/or dropping off a person with a disability.

Origin

(February 6, 2015) Letter from the Chair, Disability Issues Committee

Summary

At the February 6, 2015 Disability Issues Committee meeting, Helen Henderson, Disability Issues Committee member, advised that Wheel-Trans vehicles and accessible taxis are being ticketed by Parking Enforcement Officers when picking up and/or dropping off a person with a disability.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 6, 2015) Letter from the Chair, Disability Issues Committee on Ticketing of Vehicles During Pick-Up and Drop-Off of Persons with Disabilities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77966.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(February 23, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mary Fragedakis (EX.Main.EX4.13.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/comm/communicationfile-51855.pdf

EX4.16 - Request for Report on Expanded Gaming at Woodbine Racetrack

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
The City Manager has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (EX4.16a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

1.  City Council authorize the City Manager to conduct a public consultation process to seek input from Torontonians on the matter of expanded gaming at 555 Rexdale Boulevard (Woodbine Racetrack); including:
 
a.  a public meeting in Etobicoke;

b.  an online questionnaire promoted on the City's website and via social media;

c.  a city-wide public opinion poll; and

d.  a presentation at Executive Committee
 
2.  City Council direct the City Manager to prepare a report for the June 30, 2015 meeting of Executive Committee, which would include an assessment of the technical planning requirements, and merits and potential risks of expanded gaming at 555 Rexdale Boulevard (Woodbine Racetrack); including:
 
a.  the size and type of facility that would be suitable at the Woodbine location, including:
 
1.  total number of slot machines; and

2.  total number of other gaming tables
 
b.  any required land use, infrastructure and other planning matters associated with expanded gaming at the Woodbine site;

c. the potential economic impact (GDP and jobs) of expanded gaming at Woodbine Racetrack and the potential added economic impact of an expanded entertainment and retail destination, including a breakdown of anticipated part-time and full-time employment in the proposed gaming facility as well as projected salaries based on data from comparable casinos in Canada and the United States, and include estimations for:
 
1.  gaming revenue;

2.  non-gaming revenue;

3.  total revenue;

4.  direct, indirect, and induced jobs (FTE);

5.  average Annual Income (full-time employee); and

6.  an economic analysis to determine per slot machine how much discretionary income each slot machine would remove from the economy on an annual basis;

d.  the potential risks to the current employment at the Woodbine Racetrack if a new casino were to be located within the GTA but outside of the City of Toronto;

e.  the identification of social and economic development objectives that the City may require as conditions for its approval of expanded gaming at Woodbine, to leverage any new development to benefit local Toronto residents and communities; including recommendations to encourage full time employment.

f.  the potential additional social impact to individuals and families due to gambling-related addictive behaviour and crime; options to mitigate and strategies to address the negative human and social impacts; social procurement opportunities in the development and operation of a casino and related facilities (i.e., convention centre, hotel etc.); City and community use of space agreements for appropriate uses (i.e., local arts, culture, etc);  and measurement and monitoring systems to independently assess Social Contract implementation and effectiveness; and include information on funding for any major research used in this analysis;

g.  any incremental costs associated with expanded gaming at Woodbine including police, fire and emergency medical services costs;

h.  the amount of projected revenue to be received by the City as part of a Municipal Contribution Agreement with the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation reflecting projected revenues at the new gaming site including:

1.  total annual revenue to the City;

2.  average City share of estimated total gaming revenue; and

3.  annual minimum revenue;

i.  the benefits identified in the Woodbine Live initiative;

j.  a framework for ensuring that a Labour Peace Agreement is in place for all aspects of the proposal and a local hiring and training requirement; and

k.  the results of the public consultation, set out in Recommendation 1.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Executive Committee:

 

1. Requested the City Manager to report directly to Council with additional information from Woodbine Entertainment Group's management or Board of Directors on expanded gaming at Woodbine Racetrack including but not limited to the size of the casino expansion, the number of additional slot machines, gaming tables and the type and size of entertainment complex that would best serve their needs.

 

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Letter from Councillor Vincent Crisanti

Summary

As Deputy Mayor, I have taken on a lead role in economic development to aid in the processes that will promote revitalization and sustainability, generating gains in private investment and local job creation.  A letter submitted to my office by Woodbine Entertainment Group (WEG) has opened a dialogue to discuss merits of how, as a City, we can achieve further economic success in Etobicoke and in Toronto.

 

WEG has been a longstanding partner, operating in Toronto since 1881. The Woodbine Racetrack facility has been a part of the North Etobicoke fabric since 1956 and has since earned worldwide recognition as a premier horse racing operation.

 

I am writing the Executive Committee to advise that North Etobicoke faces the very real threat of losing the racetrack.  As you may be aware, the short term arrangement between WEG and the Province, through the Horse Racing Partnership Funding Program expires in 2019.

 

For WEG to achieve long-term sustainability for the horse racing industry, solutions must be identified that are successful over the long-term and provide consistent revenue streams that will facilitate growth, while providing security for the horse racing industry.  If solutions are not found then Toronto faces the potential loss of more than 7500 jobs and over 1800 in the Rexdale community that WEG currently provides.

 

The concept of expanded gaming will provide not only WEG a revenue stream to support horse racing at this site, but will provide the City and North Etobicoke immense revitalization and economic prospects.   I am writing to you and the Executive Committee to consider engaging in the process to attain a resolution by the City of Toronto to permit the expansion of gaming at the Woodbine Racetrack, which would include the introduction of live gaming tied to a bigger vision; the creation of a premier "entertainment destination" for our City.  The opportunity is before us to create a legacy at this site that will see an economically depressed area like Rexdale revitalized with new operations like a hotel, restaurants, retail, amenities, partnerships to support community needs, etc.  

 

Under a new administration we have the opportunity to engage the private sector, along with other orders of government to ensure that Toronto remains at the forefront of economic growth, while remaining highly competitive with its surrounding municipalities.  The expansion of the Woodbine Racetrack will allow us the opportunity to achieve just that.

 

Moving forward it is important to remember that gaming via the racetrack has been taking place since 1956 and gaming through slots and electronic tables since 2000.

 

It is also timely that we consider a live gaming expansion at this site as the OLG is currently engaged in the procurement process to identify a qualified private sector service provider to operate OLG Slots at Woodbine racetrack pursuant to its Modernization Plan.  The support of expanded gaming will allow WEG and a future private sector service provider the ability to work with the City through a redevelopment application process, creating a catalyst for revitalization of the surrounding area.  This important first step is required in order for WEG and the OLG to develop a redevelopment strategy in consultation with the City to ensure the long-term success of the Rexdale Community.

 

The expansion of gaming at this specific site will create an environment with immense potential and benefit to the City of Toronto and its residents.  Benefits include:

 

Creation of local jobs, fostering economic sustainability & vitality in the Rexdale community

Establishment of a new world class, premier "entertainment destination" for Toronto

Increased revenue to the City through property taxes and hosting fees

Redevelopment of nearly 700 acres at the 555 Rexdale Boulevard site

Remain a premier tourist attraction with over six million visitors a year

Act as a catalyst for further growth and revitalization in the Rexdale/Etobicoke area

Stronger City and Community partnership with WEG

 

It is important that we listen to our communities and act in their best interest regarding this matter.  We saw positive community support for the expansion at Woodbine, highlighted through polling and public consultations, which were identified in the 2013 report when the gaming expansion at Woodbine Racetrack was before Council in the previous term.  I also found that during my 2014 door-to-door re-election campaign that positive sentiment remained in Etobicoke North for expanded gaming at Woodbine Racetrack.  I strongly believe that the support from our residents will continue to be there, as we will have the opportunity to engage them again through a willing host/expanded gaming process site specific to 555 Rexdale Boulevard.

 

I will be in attendance at the March 25th, 2015 Executive Committee meeting to discuss this matter further with the committee and to present a motion that will be site specific to 555 Rexdale Boulevard.  This will commence the process to attain a resolution by the City of Toronto to permit the expansion of gaming at the Woodbine Racetrack, which would include the introduction of live gaming, acting as the catalyst for greater vision for this site.

 

I strongly believe that expanded gaming at Woodbine racetrack will not only allow WEG to sustain long-term revenue security for the horse racing industry, but the overall project will have even greater and more positive impacts that will be felt in Etobicoke and the rest of the City.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Letter from Councillor Vincent Crisanti on Woodbine Racetrack
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77967.pdf
(March 6, 2015) Letter from the President and Chief Executive Officer, Woodbine Entertainment Group
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-77988.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(March 30, 2015) Supplementary report from the City Manager on expansion of gaming at Woodbine Racetrack (EX4.16a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78652.pdf
Appendix 1 - Ontario Gaming Zones
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78653.pdf
Appendix 2 - letter from Woodbine to the City Manager
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78654.pdf
Appendix 3 - Summary of 2013 Staff Analysis on Expanded Gaming and Development at Woodbine Racetrack
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78655.pdf

Speakers

Nick Eaves, President and Chief Executive Officer, Woodbine Entertainment Group
Lis Pimentel, President, UNITE HERE Local 75
Guled Warsame, UNITE HERE Local 75
Bill O'Donnell, Central Ontario Standardbred Association
John Quarterly
Councillor Janet Davis
Councillor Frances Nunziata
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Gord Perks
Councillor Mike Layton
Councillor Jim Karygiannis
Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti
Councillor Vincent Crisanti
Councillor John Campbell
Councillor Norm Kelly

Communications (Committee)

(March 24, 2015) Letter from Wendy Horton, Executive Director, Youth Without Shelter (EX.Supp.EX4.16.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/comm/communicationfile-52009.pdf
(March 24, 2015) E-mail from Alex Silvers (EX.Supp.EX4.16.2)
(March 25, 2015) Submission from Councillor Gord Perks dated November 2012 (EX.New.EX4.16.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/comm/communicationfile-52050.pdf
(March 25, 2015) Submission from Councillor Norm Kelly (EX.New.EX4.16.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/comm/communicationfile-52017.pdf
(March 25, 2015) Submission from Councillor Mike Layton (EX.New.EX4.16.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/comm/communicationfile-52058.pdf

EX4.17 - Request for Report on Options to Improve Toronto Transit Commission Project Delivery

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's second Key Matter and second item of business on Tuesday, March 31st

Communication EX4.17.1 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Executive Committee recommends that:

 

1.  As the City has a duty to its citizens to deliver major capital infrastructure projects efficiently and on schedule, and as a consequence of the contract management challenges experienced with the Toronto York Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE) project that have resulted in significant delays and cost over runs, City Council direct the City Manager to report to the Executive Committee on April 22, 2015, on options for improved project delivery, including procurement and project management, for the Scarborough Subway Extension, such options to include the spectrum of procurement strategies known as Alternative Financing and Procurement and/or Public-Private-Partnerships and the role that Infrastructure Ontario can play in the delivery of such projects.

Origin

(March 23, 2015) Letter from Councillor Josh Colle, Chair, Toronto Transit Commission

Summary

As you are aware, as part of the 2015 City Budget deliberations Council adopted my motion to have the City Manager seek a third party review of the TTC's major capital projects program. This review will assess the TTC’s delivery of major capital projects, including adherence to budget and scheduling targets, processes for reporting these results to the Commission and City, and any organizational changes that would enhance results, all for consideration by the Commission in the fall of 2015.

 

In addition, under my direction, the TTC has been aggressively reviewing the manner in which it is delivering the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE) project. A report about the project delivery and budget implications will be considered by the Commission at its meeting on Thursday, March 26, 2015, and I anticipate that this report will be referred to Council for consideration at its March 31, 2015 meeting.

 

Both the TTC and City share a duty to Toronto residents to deliver major capital infrastructure projects efficiently and on schedule. In light of the challenges experienced with the TYSSE project, and the resulting delays and cost over runs, I would propose that Council direct the City Manager to submit to the next meeting of the Executive Committee a report dealing with options for improved project delivery, including procurement and project management, for the Scarborough Subway Extension.

 

The options should include the full spectrum of procurement strategies, including Alternative Financing and Procurement and/or Public-Private-Partnerships, and the role that Infrastructure Ontario can play in the delivery of such projects. This direction would align with the position of Toronto City Council and comply with Federal grant application requirements. At the time of project approval in October of 2013 (CC39.5, 6d)), Council directed staff to "aggressively pursue the Federal P3 screen process, so that any project cost savings arising from a P3 partnership with the City can be applied to reduce any dedicated tax rate increases needed to support the Scarborough Subway".

 

Accordingly, I would ask that Executive Committee consider and recommend the attached motion to Council for consideration at its meeting on March 31, 2015, in conjunction with the TTC report entitled Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension – Schedule and Budget Change.  

Background Information (Committee)

(March 23, 2015) Letter from Councillor Josh Colle, Toronto Transit Commission Chair, on Request for Report on Options to Improve Toronto Transit Commission Project Delivery
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-78337.pdf
Attachment 1 - Recommendation from Councillor Colle on Request for Report on Options to Improve Toronto Transit Commission Project Delivery
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-78340.pdf
Appendix 2 - Extract from City Council Decision on March 10, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-78343.pdf
Appendix 3 - City Council Decision on Scarborough Rapid Transit Options - Reporting on Council Terms and Conditions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-78344.pdf

Speakers

Moya Beall
Brenda Thompson, Scarbborought Transit Action
Herman Rosenfeld, TTC Riders
Councillor Gord Perks
Councillor Shelley Carroll
Councillor Josh Colle
Councillor Anthony Perruzza

Communications (City Council)

(March 29, 2015) E-mail from Marco Covi (CC.Supp.EX4.17.1)

Audit Committee - Meeting 1

AU1.3 - The Audit Committee - Roles and Responsibilities

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (February 12, 2015) from the Auditor General, for information.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Auditor General made a presentation to the Audit Committee on the Roles and Responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

Origin

(February 12, 2015) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Audit Committee is a Special Committee of City Council reporting directly to City Council.  The roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are outlined in the Toronto Municipal Code.

 

The purpose of this report is to provide additional information on the roles and responsibilities of the Audit Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 12, 2015) Report from the Auditor General - The Audit Committee - Roles and Responsibilities
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76374.pdf
Presentation material submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-77622.pdf

AU1.4 - 2014 Annual Report - Demonstrating the Value of the Auditor General’s Office

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (February 6, 2015) from the Auditor General, for information.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Jerry Shaubel, Director, Auditor General's Office, made a presentation to the Audit Committee on the 2014 Annual Report - Demonstrating the Value of the Auditor General's Office.

Origin

(February 6, 2015) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report provides information on the Auditor General's 2014 activities and financial and non-financial benefits.  Specific responsibilities of the Auditor General are set out in Chapter 3 of the Toronto Municipal Code.  The Code requires that the Auditor General report annually to Council on the activities of the Office and savings achieved.  

 

In 2014, the Office issued a total of 26 reports including 11 performance audit reports, 3 continuous controls monitoring reports and 12 other reports.  In addition, the Auditor General's Fraud and Waste Hotline Program processed 687 complaints in 2014.

 

The return on investment for the Auditor General's Office is based on estimated cost savings and revenue increases relating to audit reports and fraud investigations during the five-year period from 2010 to 2014.  Cost savings and revenue increases from audit reports issued or investigations conducted prior to 2010 are not included in the current calculation of return on investment, even though these amounts are significant.

 

Since 2010, total one-time and projected five-year cost savings and revenue increases are approximately $235.6 million.  The cumulative costs of operating the Auditor General’s Office since 2010 were approximately $19.9 million.  In simple terms, for every $1 invested in the Auditor General’s Office the return on investment was approximately $11.8.

 

The identification of cost savings and increased revenue is only one component of the Auditor General's mandate.  Equally important is the ongoing evaluation of governance, risk management and internal controls.  However, the benefits resulting from these audits are not easily quantified in financial terms.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 6, 2015) Report from the Auditor General - 2014 Annual Report, Demonstrating the Value of the Auditor General’s Office
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76348.pdf
Exhibit 3 to Attachment 1 - Letter (December 8, 2014) from Chair, Board of Directors, Toronto Community Housing Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76316.pdf
Presentation material submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-77623.pdf

AU1.5 - Clarification of Cost Savings as a Result of Toronto Community Housing Corporation Audits

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (December 15, 2014) from the Auditor General, for information.

Origin

(December 15, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to clarify the cost savings from the recommendations contained in various audit reports issued by the Auditor General relating to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation (TCHC).

 

Annual cost savings identified by the Auditor General as a result of recommendations contained in various audit reports are generally estimated conservatively.  In relation to savings identified in various TCHC reports, annual cost savings were reported to Council to be in the range of $4 million to $10 million.

 

During deliberations of the TCHC reports at the City’s Executive Committee meeting of April 2011, it was stated publicly by a member of Council that “the four to ten million in projected savings wasn’t a real figure”.  This comment implied that the Auditor General had provided misleading or erroneous information in his reports to Council.

 

Recommendations obviously take time to implement and as a result, cost savings are not always immediate.  Over the course of the past number of years, TCHC has implemented the vast majority of audit recommendations and as a result cost savings are now being realized.

 

The attached communication from the Chair of the Board of Directors of the TCHC estimates annual cost savings of over $30 million.  The calculation of $30 million is an independent assessment of the cost savings and is not information provided by the Auditor General’s Office.

 

The cost savings are the equivalent of almost seven times the budget of the Auditor General’s Office.

Background Information (Committee)

(December 15, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Clarification of Cost Savings as a Result of Toronto Community Housing Corporation Audits
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76333.pdf
Appendix 1 - Letter (December 8, 2014) from the Chair, Board of Directors, Toronto Community Housing Corporation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76334.pdf

AU1.6 - 2014 Annual Report on Fraud Including the Operations of the Fraud and Waste Hotline

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager to report in Q4 2015 on the implementation progress of the Toronto Public Service By-law including details about the management framework, tracking and reporting of employee misconduct as part of the new Disclosure of Wrongdoing provisions.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Director, Forensic Unit, Auditor General's Office, made a presentation to the Audit Committee on the 2014 Annual Report on Fraud Including the Operations of the Fraud and Waste Hotline.

Origin

(February 9, 2015) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

In June 2000, Audit Committee requested that the Auditor General submit an annual report on the status of fraud and related matters.  This report represents the 2014 annual report relating to activities of fraud and wrongdoing at the City.  It highlights only those issues that have been communicated to the Auditor General during that past year.  It does not represent an overall picture of fraud or other wrongdoing across the City.  

 

In 2002, the Fraud and Waste Hotline Program was established with Council’s approval to be operated by the Auditor General’s Office.  One of the benefits of the Hotline Program is that it provides an independent resource for employees or members of the public to report wrongdoing involving City resources, anonymously if preferred, without fear of retribution.  Since 2002, the activities of the Fraud and Waste Hotline Program have been included in the annual fraud report.

 

In 2014, 687 complaints were received by the Auditor General’s Office.  A significant number of complaints included at least two or more allegations.  We estimate the actual number of allegations is in the range of 1,300.

 

A separate Forensic Unit was established in the Auditor General’s Office in 2005 dedicated to the operation of the Hotline Program and the investigation of complaints received.  The increase in workloads and ongoing resource constraints have impacted the work of the Auditor General’s Office Forensic Unit.  The Office does not have sufficient resources to lead all investigations.  Complaints are referred to City Divisions to be investigated.  The Auditor General’s Office oversees the Divisions approach to the investigations and the results.

 

The level of independent oversight the Auditor General’s Office can provide has been reduced due to the volume of allegations and resource constraints.  The need for sufficient oversight is critical. There were instances where management has led an investigation and concluded that the complaint was unsubstantiated.  Upon further independent review by the Auditor General’s Forensic Unit, it was determined that allegations were in fact substantiated.  Additional resources are needed to ensure the Auditor General can lead key investigations and provide an increased level of independent oversight.

 

Additional resources for the Forensic Unit will be pursued as part of the 2016 budget process.

 

The Auditor General’s responsibility to operate the Hotline Program, conduct investigations and provide oversight was reinforced by Council through its adoption of a Toronto Public Service By-law, at its meeting of June 10-11, 2014.  The by-law introduced a new Disclosure of Wrongdoing framework.

 

In the 2013 annual report on fraud and hotline activities, the Auditor General recommended that management report to Council on details of the proposed Disclosure of Wrongdoing framework, including how management will track, address and publicly report out on employee “misconduct”.

 

The City Manager’s Office has advised it will work with the Auditor General’s Office to establish and implement a working protocol that supports the Disclosure of Wrongdoing and Reprisal Protection Policy that will come into effect December 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 9, 2015) Report from the Auditor General - 2014 Annual Report on Fraud Including the Operations of the Fraud and Waste Hotline
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76326.pdf
Presentation material submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-77624.pdf

AU1.7 - Operational Review of Build Toronto Inc.

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with Build Toronto's Chief Executive Officer, to review the Shareholder Direction on a periodic basis to ensure that the mandate and City objectives remain consistent with City Council's ongoing priorities and expectations for Build Toronto.  Any changes required should be submitted to City Council for approval.

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with Build Toronto's Chief Executive Officer:

 

                         a.  formalize a dividend policy consistent with the mandate and objectives of Build Toronto; and

 

                         b.  establish processes to enable the periodic review of the dividend policy.

 

3.  City Council request the City Manager to ensure that the ongoing review of real estate holdings and the City-Wide Office Modernization Plan consider alternate accommodation solutions to allow for the development of high value sites.  The City Manager report to City Council and the Board of Build Toronto annually on the progress made to identify sites currently in operational or program use that have significant development or value potential.

 

4.  City Council request the City Manager to ensure that a comprehensive City-Wide Real Estate Strategy is prepared which contemplates:

 

            a.  Protocols for cooperation by City divisions, agencies, and corporations which clarifies how they would be compensated for the operating and capital impacts of transferring properties to Build Toronto.

 

            b.  Protocols for real estate development activities carried out by City agencies and corporations and whether such activities should be centralized or coordinated with Build Toronto.

 

c.  The return of a portion of revenue to the originating body which declares a property surplus, in order to encourage an increase in identification of surplus property by the City's agencies and corporations, such as the Toronto Transit Commission.

 

5.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Corporate Officer and Build Toronto's Chief Executive Officer, to ensure that properties already declared surplus are transferred to Build Toronto on timely basis.

 

6.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officer of Build Toronto, to report to Council the estimated open market financial impact of terms and conditions of transfer agreements together with any Section 37 or other obligations on properties transferred to Build Toronto.

 

7.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Executive Officers of Build Toronto, Invest Toronto, and Toronto Port Lands Company to review areas where opportunities exist to consolidate or coordinate operations and report to City Council on the results of these consultations.

 

8.  City Council request the City Manager to report to the appropriate Committee with a determination of the value to the City generated by Build Toronto, and on whether existing City divisions and/or agencies or an alternate model would be better able to take over any of Build Toronto's functions.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The following City officials made a presentation to the Audit Committee on the Operational Review of Build Toronto Inc.:

 

-           Beverly Romeo-Beehler, Auditor General

 

-           Jerry Shaubel, Director, Auditor General's Office.

Origin

(January 29, 2015) Letter from the President and CEO, Build Toronto, and the Chairman, Build Toronto Inc. Board of Directors

Summary

At its meeting on January 26, 2015, the Build Toronto Inc. Board of Directors considered a report (November 17, 2014) entitled, “Auditor General’s Report – Operational Review of Build Toronto Inc”.

 

The Board adopted the following motion:

 

-           Receive the report of the Auditor General dated October 14, 2014.

 

-           Adopt the 18 recommendations numbered 1 through 4, 10 through 13, 15 through 21, and 23 through 25, most of which were previously identified by Management and the Board, and were already being remedied as the report was being completed, and the Board’s agreement with the Management responses to those recommendations.

 

-           Endorse the seven recommendations to City Council numbered 5 through 9, 14 and 22.

 

-           Direct that the report be forwarded to the City's Audit Committee per Recommendation 26.

 

-           Direct the Financial, Audit and Risk Management Committee receive Management’s detailed Action Plan and Time Frame, and monitor the progress of the completion of the items.

 

-           Thank the Auditor General (and the previous Auditor General) and her staff for their efforts, and the clear and concise report.

 

The Auditor General presented a thorough Report and many of the recommendations directed to Build Toronto had already been recognized by the Board and Management and are currently being addressed.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 29, 2015) Letter from the President and CEO, Build Toronto, and the Chairman, Build Toronto Inc. Board of Directors, advising of the actions taken by the Board during consideration of the Auditor General's report, headed "Operational Review of Build Toronto Inc."
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76202.pdf
(November 17, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Operational Review of Build Toronto Inc.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76203.pdf
Presentation material submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-77625.pdf

Speakers

Deputy Mayor Denzil Minnan-Wong
Councillor David Shiner

AU1.8 - 2015 Audit Work Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee  recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the Auditor General’s 2015 Audit Work Plan, as detailed in the report (February 11, 2015) from the Auditor General.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Auditor General made one presentation addressing the following Items:

 

- AU1.8, headed "2015 Audit Work Plan"

 

- AU1.9, headed "Auditor General’s Office - 2015 Operating Budget"

 

- AU1.10, headed "Auditor General's Office - 2015-2024 Capital Budget and Plan"

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with an overview of the work the Auditor General plans to conduct during 2015.  It also contains a synopsis of the work undertaken during the past few years:

 

-           Appendix 1 contains the Auditor General’s 2015 Audit Work Plan

-           Appendix 2 includes a summary of a backlog of audits reports

-           Appendix 3 lists amendments to the 2014 Audit Work Plan projects

-           Appendix 4 includes audits completed during the period 2010 to 2014

 

The 2015 Audit Work Plan provides City Council with an overview of how the resources that have been allocated to the Auditor General’s Office will be used during 2015.

 

The audits that will be undertaken as part of the 2015 Audit Work Plan will provide independent information for City Council to hold City administrators accountable for providing stewardship over public funds and for achieving value for money in City operations.  The information will help City administrators improve City operations, mitigate risks, strengthen management controls, improve accountability and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of City services.

 

The Work Plan includes audits in progress, new audit projects, annual recurring projects, follow-up audits and the Fraud and Waste Hotline investigative work.  Follow-up audits are conducted to ensure that management has taken appropriate action to implement the recommendations from past audit and investigative reports.  The Auditor General may revise the Work Plan as new information arises.

 

The Auditor General undertakes a risk-based audit approach.  Every five years the Auditor General performs an extensive city-wide risk assessment of the City operations and its major agencies and corporations.  The risk-assessment is a major undertaking that includes a city-wide survey and detailed interviews with senior city officials and City Councillors.  The assessment is used to identify the high risk areas so that audit work can be prioritized.  The city-wide risk assessment also builds knowledge of the audit environment.

 

The Audit Work Plan includes projects identified from preliminary results of the risk-assessment.  The final risk assessment will be reported to the May 22, 2015 Audit Committee meeting.  The results will be used to update the 2015 Audit Work Plan and to prepare the Audit Work Plans for future years.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 11, 2015) Report from the Auditor General - 2015 Audit Work Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76340.pdf
Presentation material submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-77626.pdf

AU1.13 - Update on Arenas and Community Centres - 2013 Audited Financial Statements

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the 2013 audited financial statements for the Ted Reeve Community Arena, William H. Bolton Arena, and the Ralph Thornton Community Centre attached as Appendices.

Origin

(September 18, 2014) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The purpose of this report is to provide the Audit Committee and City Council with an update on the 2013 audited financial statements of Arenas and Community Centres.

 

The 2013 audited financial statements of the majority of Arenas and Community Centres were provided to Audit Committee at its June 27, 2014 meeting, after approval by their respective Boards or Committees of Management.  The signed financial statements for the Ted Reeve Community Arena, William H. Bolton Arena, and the Ralph Thornton Community Centre had not been received at that time.

 

This report provides City Council with the remaining 2013 audited financial statements of Arenas and Community Centres.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 18, 2014) Report from the Auditor General - Update on Arenas and Community Centres - 2013 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76341.pdf
Attachment 1 - 2013 Financial Statements, Ted Reeves Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76342.pdf
Attachment 2 - 2013 Financial Statements, William H. Bolton Arena
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76343.pdf
Attachment 3 - 2013 Financial Statements, Ralph Thornton Community Centre
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76344.pdf

AU1.14 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2013 Audited Financial Statements - Report No. 2

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommend that:

 

1.  City Council approve the 2013 audited financial statements and management letters of the thirty-one (31) Business Improvement Areas attached as Appendices A to AG of the report (February 9, 2015) from the Treasurer and the Director, Business Growth Services, Economic Development and Culture.

Origin

(February 9, 2015) Report from the Treasurer and the Director, Business Growth Services, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

The purpose of this report is to present the 2013 audited financial statements and management letters for thirty-one (31) Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) to Audit Committee and City Council for its approval.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 9, 2015) Report from the Treasurer and the Director, Business Growth Services, Economic Development and Culture, submitting the 2013 Audited Financial Statements of 31 Business Improvement Areas
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76150.pdf
Appendix A: Albion-Islington Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76187.pdf
Appendix B: Bloordale Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76188.pdf
Appendix C: Cabbagetown Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76189.pdf
Appendix D: College Promenade Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76212.pdf
Appendix E: Dovercourt Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76213.pdf
Appendix E - 1: Dovercourt Village Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76235.pdf
Appendix F: Dundas West Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76236.pdf
Appendix F - 1: Dundas West Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76237.pdf
Appendix G: Dupont By The Castle Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76238.pdf
Appendix H: Eglinton Hill Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76239.pdf
Appendix I: Emery Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76260.pdf
Appendix J: Gerrard India Bazaar Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76261.pdf
Appendix K: Kensington Market Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76262.pdf
Appendix K - 1: Kensington Market Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76263.pdf
Appendix L: Lakeshore Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76264.pdf
Appendix L - 1: Lakeshore Village Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76265.pdf
Appendix M: Liberty Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76266.pdf
Appendix M - 1: Liberty Village Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76267.pdf
Appendix N: Little Italy Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76268.pdf
Appendix N - 1: Little Italy Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76269.pdf
Appendix O: Little Portugal Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76270.pdf
Appendix P: Long Branch Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76271.pdf
Appendix Q: Mimico By The Lake Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76272.pdf
Appendix R: Mount Pleasant Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76273.pdf
Appendix S: Oakwood Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76274.pdf
Appendix T: Queen Street West Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76275.pdf
Appendix T - 1: Queen Street West Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76276.pdf
Appendix U: Regal Heights Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76277.pdf
Appendix V: Roncesvalles Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76278.pdf
Appendix W: shoptheQueensway.com Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76279.pdf
Appendix X: Trinity Bellwoods Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76280.pdf
Appendix Y: Upper Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76281.pdf
Appendix Y - 1: Upper Village Management Letter
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76282.pdf
Appendix Z: Village Of Islington Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76283.pdf
Appendix AA: Weston Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76284.pdf
Appendix AB: West Queen West Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76245.pdf
Appendix AC: Wexford Heights Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76246.pdf
Appendix AD: Wychwood Heights Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76253.pdf
Appendix AE: York - Eglinton Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76254.pdf
Appendix AF : A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani dated October 24, 2014 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified for eighteen (18) of the BIAs audited by him and appended.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76255.pdf
Appendix AG: A letter from the auditor, Robert Gore & Associates dated January 21, 2015 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified for five (5) of the BIAs audited by him and appended.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76256.pdf

AU1.16 - Service Efficiency Consultants Studies - Extent of Value for Money from Studies Has Not Been Clearly Demonstrated

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, to expedite the development and implementation of a formal consultant performance evaluation process.  The consultant evaluation should include both qualitative and quantitative performance measures that help evaluate the quality and practicality of deliverables, the efficiency of the consultant in managing time and resources, and the cost of work in relation to the benefits received, ensuring that any such measures align with the scope of work.

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division, to require City Agencies and Corporations to participate in the sharing of information on consultant performance with the City.

 

3.  City Council request the City Manager to submit a final report to City Council that clearly demonstrates the overall value for money achieved from the use of consultants on the Service Efficiency Studies.  Such report should include a comprehensive analysis of the qualitative and quantitative effects of the Service Efficiency Studies, in particular the net financial impacts to date for all recommendations.  Anticipated financial benefits and costs should also be quantified to the extent possible.  This report be completed by September 30, 2015.

 

4.  City Council request the City Manager to forward this report to the City agencies and corporations for information.

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This report provides information related to the results of the Auditor General’s 2014 audit of the use of service efficiency consultants which was included in the 2014 Audit Work Plan and a January 2015 Budget Committee request related to the implementation status of the KPMG City of Toronto - Shared Services Efficiency Study.

 

Auditor General’s 2014 Review of the Use of Service Efficiency Study Consultants

 

The Auditor General’s 2014 Audit Work Plan included a review of the use of consultants on Service Efficiency Studies.  The overall objective of this audit was to determine whether the City received value for money from the Service Efficiency Studies.  The audit also examined whether the consultant deliverables met the stated expectations of quality, price and timeliness. 

 

Attachment 1 includes a cover report and the audit report prepared and signed by the previous Auditor General as well as management’s response to the recommendations contained in the report.

 

Management agrees with the four recommendations made in the report.

 

Request for Information – January 29, 2015

 

At the January 29, 2015 Budget Committee meeting, the Auditor General was requested to provide a status update on the implementation of recommendations related to the shared services initiative.  One of the 22 consultant reports reviewed during this project related to shared services.  This report provides information related to the City Shared Services Project and consultant’s shared service recommendations.  The Auditor General included a project to monitor the progress of the City Shared Service Project in her 2015 Work Plan.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 11, 2015) Report from the Auditor General - Service Efficiency Consultants Studies - Extent of Value for Money from Studies Has Not Been Clearly Demonstrated
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76313.pdf
Attachment 1 - Previous Auditor General Report (December 16, 2014), titled "Service Efficiency Consultants Studies - Extent of Value for Money From Studies Has Not Been Clearly Demonstrated"
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76314.pdf

AU1.17 - Software Licenses - Managing the Asset and Related Risks

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to ensure there is a software owner identified for all software assets and that activities to ensure compliance with software licensing agreements are performed in accordance with the divisional policy.

 

2.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to ensure there is adequate coordination between asset purchases and anticipated changes in corporate information technology configurations.

 

3.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to ensure key contract terms and conditions are summarized and used to facilitate effective contract management.

 

4.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to take appropriate action to ensure there is no significant further delay in the implementation of all relevant modules of the information technology asset management system.

 

5.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to ensure that divisional staff responsible for recording purchases in the financial information system are adequately trained on the appropriate account codes to be used and that procedures include sufficient reviews to provide assurance that correct codes are used.

 

6.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to develop a formal procedure for the coordination of acquisition of information technology with the City's agencies and corporations. Such procedures should include clearly defined steps to be taken to ensure agencies and corporations are made aware of all significant opportunities.

 

7.  City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to direct City divisions to facilitate, to the maximum extent possible, the automated collection and monitoring of software license related information. 

 

8.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to implement a process to review and validate reasons for restrictions on the use of the data collection tool.

 

9.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to proceed with the software reconciliation process for those software titles where the software owner has been identified.

 

10.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to ensure software owners perform annual software reconciliations and report the results to the Information and Technology Division.

 

11.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to ensure that the inventory of software is completed as soon as possible and that software usage reports be developed and distributed to software owners for their review.  Software owners should report back on license usage to the Chief Information Officer so that proper decisions can be made in relation to City software assets.

 

12.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to develop and implement procedures for the decommissioning and disposal of software assets.

 

13.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to document policies and procedures for granting and maintaining administrative rights.

 

14.  City Council request the Chief Information Officer to ensure that a comprehensive and functional database of users with administrative rights is established and maintained.

Origin

(February 4, 2015) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General’s Work Plan included a review of the software asset management process.  The objective of the audit was to determine the adequacy of management controls over the use of software licenses and to examine the procedures being used to ensure the City complies with software license agreements.

 

Software license acquisition and maintenance is a significant investment for the City of Toronto.  In 2014, the City spent approximately $14 million on acquisitions and $22 million on maintenance and support of more than 7,200 software titles.  The total spent over the past five years was approximately $140 million.

 

This report contains fourteen recommendations along with management's response to each of the recommendations.  The implementation of these recommendations will improve compliance with software licensing agreements and enhance efficiencies over the administration and management of information technology software assets.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 4, 2015) Report from the Auditor General - Software Licenses - Managing the Asset and Related Risks
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76330.pdf

AU1.18 - Review of Divisional Purchase Orders

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager to expedite implementation of the outstanding recommendation, below, which is contained in the Auditor General’s 2010 report “City Purchasing Card (PCard) Program – Improving Controls Before Expanding the Program”:

 

             The Treasurer develop and implement strategies to promote and expand the use of PCards by City divisions.  Such strategies should include, but not be limited to:

 

a.         Analyzing divisional purchasing patterns to identify potential areas for expansion.

 

b.         Developing and implementing measures to increase the use of PCards by divisions.

 

c.         Setting performance goals for the City based on the number of participating divisions and yearly PCard purchase volume.”

 

2.  City Council request the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management review and revise quality assurance procedures including:

 

a.  Taking a risk-based approach to selecting Departmental Purchase Order files for review.

 

b.  Adjusting sample sizes to a manageable level, to allow for a balance between the sufficiency and timeliness of file reviews.

 

c.  Tracking and monitoring the progress and compliance of divisions.

 

3.  City Council request the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management expand the analysis of quarterly Divisional Purchase Order activity to include the identification of:

 

a.  Instances of invoice splitting.

 

b.  Purchases being completed prior to creation of Divisional Purchase Order.

 

c.   Excessive, repetitive purchases from the same vendor, regardless of value.

 

d.  Opportunities for efficiencies through use of City’s purchasing cards or blanket contracts.

 

4.  City Council request the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management to require staff be re-trained on the use of Divisional Purchase Orders in instances where consistently significant non-compliance is detected through quality assurance procedures.

Origin

(February 5, 2015) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

This review was initiated because of the increase in the Divisional Purchase Order (DPO) limit to $50,000, the potential for a further increase in this limit, and instances of non-compliance with City purchasing policies and procedures that were identified in the past.

 

Although controls over DPOs have improved, there is an opportunity for the City to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of DPOs as one of the City’s purchasing methodologies.  This report contains four recommendations to improve cost-effectiveness, efficiency and management controls.

 

A separate letter has been issued to management outlining recommendations for minor administrative improvements that came to our attention during the audit.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 5, 2015) Report from the Auditor General - Review of Divisional Purchase Orders
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76331.pdf

AU1.19 - Facilities Management - Security and Safety Improvements Required

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies and corporations

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to develop a plan to complete a review of physical security at all City facilities using a risk based approach and to address any deficiencies found during the review.

 

2.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to perform the appropriate follow up reviews to ensure identified security deficiencies are adequately addressed by the divisions.

 

3.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to update Site Information Packages after significant changes have been made to a facility and periodically for all facilities.

 

4.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to implement a process to ensure that all closed circuit television cameras not on the network are regularly checked and equipment deficiencies for all equipment are documented and repaired.

 

5.  City Council adopt the recommendation contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (February 3, 2015) from the Auditor General.

 

6.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to regularly obtain employee termination reports from Corporate Human Resources and upon review cancel user access as required.

 

7.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to run reports to clean and validate employee data, in conjunction with divisional management contacts, and to identify inactive access cards and upon review, cancel user access as required, by March 31, 2015 and periodically thereafter.

 

8.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to implement a review process for corporate sites to identify terminated access cardholders and remove access in accordance with security policies.

 

9.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer ensure that all access card request forms have the necessary information, access requirements and approvals completed before processing.

 

10.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to review the current level of mobile patrolling activity to determine if it adequately meets requirements and propose options for the actions, if any, necessary to satisfy the security needs.

 

11.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to update run sheets and develop a protocol to ensure that all City facilities are patrolled over a reasonable period of time by using a combination of scheduled and random patrols.

 

12.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to ensure that supervisors periodically run a status report for open incident reports and close them in a timely manner once resolved.

 

13.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to periodically review work orders for the vendors responsible for the maintenance of security equipment that have been outstanding for longer than two weeks and to follow-up with the vendor to resolve outstanding deficiencies in a timely manner.

 

14.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to request monthly reports and supporting documentation from the vendor and to review and monitor performance.  When deficiencies are identified, appropriate corrective action should be taken.

 

15.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to review all time and material invoices billed since July 1, 2014 by the vendor and initiate recovery of any overpayments.

 

16.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to ensure that payments for services are not made to vendors until all work has been completed according to the contract specifications.

 

17.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to further develop and implement performance measures that will promote performance improvement, effectiveness, efficiency, and appropriate levels of internal controls.

 

18.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to review the current requirement for use of force training and make any necessary adjustments to corporate requirements.

 

19.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to store all corporate training records for security guards in a centrally maintained database, to update training records in a timely manner and to monitor compliance with training requirements.

 

20.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to ensure that emergency plans are tested by conducting drills or exercises for important portions of the plan and that the results be reviewed and changes be made to the plan accordingly.

 

21.  City Council request the Chief Corporate Officer to periodically update policies and procedures to reflect current operational practices, improvements to safety and security, and after any significant changes in processes or security incidents.

 

22.  City Council not authorize the public release of the confidential report in Attachment 1 as this report involves the security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies and corporations.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Auditor General made a presentation to the Audit Committee on Facilities Management - Security and Safety Improvements Required.

Origin

(February 3, 2015) Report from the Auditor General

Summary

The Auditor General's Audit Work Plan included a review of Facilities Management – Security and Safety.  Corporate Security provides security services at over 1,300 City facilities including City Hall, Metro Hall, civic centres, Union Station and divisional facilities.  The objective of this audit was to assess the adequacy and effectiveness of the physical security and safety measures at City facilities.

 

Our audit findings and recommendations are detailed in Appendix1 to this report.

Some of the report sections pertaining to the security of property that belongs to the City contain confidential information.  These audit findings are presented separately to this report in confidential Attachment 1. 

Background Information (Committee)

(February 3, 2015) Report from the Auditor General - Facilities Management - Security and Safety Improvements Required
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76417.pdf
Attachment 1: Confidential Information - Facilities Management - Security and Safety Improvements Required
Presentation material submitted by the Auditor General
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-77629.pdf

AU1.20 - Award of Request for Proposal No. 9171-14-7121 to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for External Audit Services for the City and Certain of its Agencies and Corporations

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - The security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies and corporations

Committee Recommendations

The Audit Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council grant authority to the Auditor General to negotiate and enter into an agreement in the amount of $3,816,000 net of HST recoveries with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP being the highest ranked proponent meeting the requirements of the RFP to perform the annual financial statement audits for the years 2015 to 2019 inclusive for the City of Toronto and certain of its agencies and corporations, as well as other attest audits of financial information as described in the RFP, on the terms and conditions set out in RFP 9171-14-7121 and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information in Attachment 2 to the report (February 10, 2015) from the Auditor General and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, upon Council’s approval of this contract award to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP signing the contract.

Origin

(February 10, 2015) Report from the Auditor General and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise on the results of Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 9171-14-7121 for an auditor licensed under the Public Accounting Act, 2004 to perform the annual financial statement audits for the years 2015 to 2019 inclusive for the City of Toronto and certain of its agencies and corporations, as well as other attest audits of financial information and to request authority to enter into an agreement with the recommended proponent. 

Background Information (Committee)

(February 10, 2015) Report from the Auditor General and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management - Award of Request for Proposal No. 9171-14-7121 to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for External Audit Services for the City and Certain of its Agencies and Corporations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-76317.pdf
Attachment 2 - Confidential Information: Breakdown of Contract Value by Audit as Included in Request for Proposal No. 9171-14-7121

Background Information (City Council)

Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on April 13, 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-92065.pdf

Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 4

CA4.1 - Appointment of Members to the Board of Health

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CA4.1.1 has been submitted on this Item

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Board of Health

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Board of Health, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018 and until successors are appointed:

 

- Stacey Berry

 

- Ashna Bowry

 

- Angela Jonsson

 

- Elisa Levi

 

- Paul Nagpal

 

- Peter Wong

 

2. City Council appoint Angela Kennedy as the education representative on the Board of Health, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018, and until a successor is appointed.

 

3. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (February 20, 2015) from the City Clerk remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Board of Health.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Stacey Berry

 

Stacey Berry is passionate about community development and health awareness. She has an MA in Public Policy, Administration and Law, and an Honours BA from York University. Stacey worked as a constituency assistant for a MPP, as an Office Manager and Correspondence Coordinator for the Minister of Health Promotion and Sport, as a Government and Public Relations Liaison to the Minister of Consumer Services and interned as a federal policy assistant for Local Initiatives Support Corporation in Washington D.C. Stacey is the owner of Bstellar Consulting Group.

 

Ashna Bowry

 

Ashna Bowry is an academic Family Physician at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto. She trained at the University of Bristol, UK and completed a residency in Family Medicine at the University of Toronto. Ashna graduated with an MSc degree in International Health and Tropical Medicine from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Ashna's clinical focus is providing primary care to vulnerable patients in inner-city Toronto, mainly pediatric, mental health and chronic disease management cases.

 

Angela Jonsson

 

Angela Jonsson is currently Manager of Stakeholders for Canada's Minister of Labour. She has worked in all levels of government including the Toronto District School Board, and in the 2008 presidential race in the USA. Angela has served in a variety of leadership roles for election campaigns, volunteers regularly tutoring and mentoring high school students, and is an active member of various not-for-profit organizations. In her spare time, she enjoys running marathons, baking, and exploring the city.

 

Angela Kennedy

 

Angela Kennedy is an RN and Certified Diabetes Educator currently working as a staff member of the Diabetes Care Team at Toronto East General Hospital. She was educated in Toronto attending Corpus Christi Elementary School, Notre Dame Catholic Secondary School and St Joseph's School of Nursing. She was first elected school trustee with the Toronto Catholic District School Board in 2000 and is currently serving her 5th term.

 

Elisa Levi

 

Elisa Levi currently works with the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer as Director of Strategy Implementation for First Nations, Inuit and Metis Cancer Control.  Elisa contributes her leadership skills to various organizations, including serving as co-chair of the Aboriginal Nutrition Network, Governing Circle Director for The Circle, Advisor at Small Change Fund, and Trustee for Nawash. Elisa has a Master's of Public Health from Lakehead University, and a BASC from Ryerson University.

 

Paul Nagpal

 

Paul Nagpal is an advisor working with small and mid-sized companies. He provides sales & growth advisory and interim management services, particularly within the technology, food, and retail sectors. Paul has worked with many companies to help them define strategies that drive sustainable sales growth.  Paul also sits on a number of boards and is an advisor/mentor to many start-up companies, providing both oversight and hands-on support to ensure they are best positioned for success.

 

Peter Wong

 

Dr. Peter Wong trained in Paediatric/Cardiology at SickKids Hospital, is a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, is an Assistant Professor of Paediatrics at the University of Toronto, and has a Master's and a PhD in Public Health.  Peter is the past Site Chief of Paediatrics at William Osler Health Centre and Medical Consultant with Niagara Region Public Health. He has received recognitions from the Rexdale Community Health Centre and SickKids Hospital.

Summary

The Interview Subcommittee for the Board of Health conducted interviews on February 27, 2015 and forwards its recommended candidates to the Civic Appointments Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 27, 2015) Decision Letter from the Interview Subcommittee for Board of Health
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77672.htm
(February 20, 2015) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Members to the Board of Health
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77707.pdf
Attachment 1 - Nomination Letter from the Toronto District School Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77708.pdf
Attachment 2 - Nomination Letter from the Toronto Catholic District School Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77709.pdf
Attachment 3 - Letter from the Chair of the Toronto Catholic District School Board
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77710.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of candidates and qualifications summary, and applications for Appointment to the Board of Health (previously distributed with Item CA3.2)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information summary (previously distributed with Item CA3.2)

Speakers

Councillor Joe Mihevc

Communications (City Council)

(March 26, 2015) Submission from Angela Kennedy, Toronto Catholic District School Board Trustee - Ward 4 (CC.Supp.CA4.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52114.pdf

CA4.2 - Appointment of Member to the Toronto Port Authority

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matter about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidate to the Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on March 31, 2018 and until a successor is appointed:

 

- Amanda Walton

 

2. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachments 1, 2 and 3 to the report (February 25, 2015) from the City Clerk and Confidential Attachment 4 remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidate's biography:

 

Amanda Walton

 

Amanda Walton is a corporate communications and public affairs consultant. She previously worked as a Senior Vice President and Partner at Advance Planning & Communications Inc. Amanda has a BA in History and Political Science from Victoria College at the University of Toronto. She has served on the boards of Ontario Place, the Canadian National Exhibition Association, the Albany Club, and Crescent School.

Summary

The Interview Subcommittee for the Toronto Port Authority conducted interviews on March 4, 2015 and forwards its recommended candidates to the Civic Appointments Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 4, 2015) Decision Letter from the Interview Subcommittee for Toronto Port Authority
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77675.htm
Confidential Attachment to the Decision Letter from the Interview Subcommittee for Toronto Port Authority
(February 25, 2015) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Member to the Toronto Port Authority Board of Directors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77711.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of candidates and qualifications summary, and applications for Appointment to the Toronto Port Authority Board (previously distributed with Item CA3.1)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information summary (previously distributed with Item CA3.1)
Confidential Attachment 3 - Interview Schedule for Interview Subcommittee for Toronto Port Authority Meeting on March 4, 2015
(March 4, 2015) Confidential Attachment 4 - Supplementary eligibility information about a candidate

CA4.3 - Appointment of Members to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council (TMAC)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council (TMAC)

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that: 

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council (TMAC), at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018:

 

Tourism Toronto Member:

 

- Andrew Weir

 

BIA Member:

 

- Spencer Sutherland

 

Independent Artist:

 

- Miranda Mulholland

 

Industry Members:

 

- Eric Alper

 

- Derek Andrews

 

- Vivian Barclay

 

- Mary An Blom

 

- Dan Broome

 

- Jeff Cohen

 

- Jeff Craib

 

- Sari Delmar

 

- Jay Douglas

 

- Justin Erdman

 

- Murray Foster

 

- Adam Gill, President

 

- Graham Henderson

 

- Derek “Drex” Jancar

 

- Andreas Kalogiannides

 

- Che Kothari

 

- Jesse Kumagai

 

- Robert Lanni

 

- Alexander Mair

 

- Amanda Martinez

 

- Mervon Mehta

 

- Noah Mintz

 

- Rodney Murphy

 

- Errol Nazareth

 

- Jeffrey Remedios

 

- Roberta Smith

 

- Patti-Anne Tarlton

 

2. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (March 5, 2015) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council (TMAC).

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Eric Alper

 

Eric Alper is Director of Media Relations for eOne Music Canada, and the host of SiriusXM's ThatEricAlper show. He is also CTV's music correspondent and a regular contributor to CBC Radio, Country 92.9 in Chatham-Kent, DAWG FM in Ottawa, and CJBK AM in London among others. He has been named to Billboard Magazine, Paste Magazine and The National Post's "best on social media", with over 500,000 followers on Twitter and over 25,000 fans on Facebook.

 

Derek Andrews

 

Derek Andrews is an independent arts consultant, Music Curator at Toronto's Luminato Festival, artistic director of Mundial Montreal, and is the music programmer for North York's Cultural Festival. As an Associate Member of the European Forum of Worldwide Music Festivals, Derek is an internationally recognized authority on "world music" and a passion advocate for creative approaches in music as a tool for breaking down cultural barriers.

 

Vivian Barclay

 

Vivian Barclay, General Manager of Warner Chappell Music Canada Ltd., has worked as a radio programmer and on-air host, in artist management, publicity and promotion and as a programmer for conferences and festivals. A Ryerson University Graduate with a degree, Vivian joined Warner Chappell in 2001, and rose through the ranks with stints in royalties, copyright, song plugging.  Vivian is on the boards of the CMPA, the CMRRA, SOCAN and Phemphat Entertainment Group (Honey Jam Showcase).

 

Mary An Blom

 

A 21-year veteran of the industry, Mary An Blom is currently Director of Corporate Strategy and Insights at Sony Music. Her role includes assessing new business ventures, which has allowed her to work with stakeholders in diverse aspects of the Toronto entertainment community.  She also works closely with the executive team on strategic planning, and is known for her ability to distil complex problems and deliver creative and collaborative solutions.  She is a classically trained flutist.

 

Dan Broome

 

Daniel Broome has spent the last 21 years working in the Canadian Music Business. A marketing, media, culture, arts, and entertainment professional, he started in the industry in 1993 at True North Records / The Finkelstein Management Company as the company's VP of Operations and Administration. Currently, Daniel is the Acting Executive Director at the Toronto Musicians' Association representing the over 3,000 professional musicians working and living in the Greater Toronto Area.

 

Jeff Cohen

 

Jeff Cohen (JC) is co-owner of iconic Toronto live music venues the Legendary H-Shoe Tavern and Lee's Palace. He also co-owns Toronto based Collective Concerts and The Toronto Urban Roots fest

 

Jeff Craib

 

Twenty-five year music industry veteran Jeff Craib has a career that spans hundreds of artists, thousands of shows and international recognition and respect from his peers. As President of The Feldman Agency, Jeff's enthusiasm has always stemmed from his work as an agent. Jeff's vast industry knowledge, passion for artist development, keen eye for marketing, and touring expertise gives him the advantage and ability to plan and execute any type of live event for any type of audience.

 

Sari Delmar

 

Sari founded AB at the age of 18. Sari's time is spent on handling business development and strategic partnerships for the company and travelling the world. Sari has been invited to speak at international conferences, sit on the Toronto Music Advisory Council and the Toronto Austin Alliance Council, and in 2014 was awarded with an International Women Achievers' Award in the Entertainment category. Her blog is a hotbed for emerging artist and entrepreneur advice.

 

Jay Douglas

 

Jay Douglas first took to the stage in Montego Bay, Jamaica many years ago as a youth. Having over 45 years of showmanship, Jay has developed a wide-ranging repertoire of American blues, West Indian rhythms, jazz standards, fancy footwork, and plenty of stage charisma. In the early '60s, Jay fronted tough R&B band "The Cougars," who, lit up Toronto and Montreal bars in the late 70's with Soul, Funk and Reggae music.

 

Justin Erdman

 

Currently consulting, Justin recently led Canada for Deezer, the global streaming music service. He began his career at MuchMusic.com, managing digital production for live TV broadcasts and major events. He has also led digital production and emerging tech for Canada's largest record label Universal Music Canada. He has spoken at NXNE, Canadian Music Week, and in front of the Committee on Canadian Heritage in Ottawa. Billboard has twice named him to the Top 140 music biz personalities on Twitter.

 

Murray Foster

 

Murray Foster grew up in Thornhill Ontario. While earning an English degree at University of Toronto, his band Moxy Fruvous became a national sensation. When that band ended in 2000 Murray joined Newfoundland band Great Big Sea. Murray founded a green-energy company in 2007 and the Toronto Songwriting School in 2013. He teaches songwriting at Seneca College, is Executive Director of non-profit organization Our Place Initiative and just finished writing/directing his first feature film, "The Cocksure Lads Movie"

 

Adam Gill

 

Born and raised in Toronto, Adam Gill founded Embrace in 2002 while at university with the vision of creating a leading independent live music and entertainment company.

Since its inception, Embrace has expanded to include artist management, consumer brand partnerships/sponsorships, venue management and the presentation of over 500 live events, concerts and festivals per year throughout North America.

 

Graham Henderson

 

Graham Henderson is President of Music Canada, an association that promotes the interests of the Canadian music community. Graham has been working with artists for more than 25 years, first as one of Canada's leading entertainment lawyers and later as Senior VP, Business Affairs and eCommerce at Universal Music Canada. Graham contributes his time on the Boards of Directors of The Corporation of Massey Hall and Roy Thomson Hall, Invest Toronto, the Ontario Chamber of Commerce and Re:Sound.

 

Derek "drex" Jancar

 

Over the years, Jancar himself has led a colourful life rich in experience. He has been a recording artist, a social entrepreneur, a youth leader, a talent manager, a marketing director for a luxury car company, a co-founder of several award-winning grassroots youth-led initiatives and a co-founder of NHL star Dave Bolland's charitable foundation. Currently Drex's portfolio consists primarily of management responsibility towards Drake's OVO Fest and OVO Clothing, Majid Jordan and Remix

 

Andreas Kalogiannides

 

Andreas Kalogiannides is a Toronto lawyer practising in corporate and intellectual property law, focusing on music and entertainment.  His firm, Kalogiannides Law, provides to musicians and other creative professionals the tools to create, protect and monetize their work. Prior to practising law, Andreas gained experience in a variety of music industry roles, including at Re:Sound, the Future of Music Coalition (Washington, D.C), and Universal Music Canada.  Andreas is a Toronto native.

 

Che Kothari

 

Che is the Founding Director and Chairman of Manifesto Community Projects whose mission is to unite, inspire and empower diverse communities of young people through arts and culture. Che is a member of the Toronto Arts Council Advocacy advisory, the Steering Committee for ArtReach Toronto, Daniel's Spectrum Arts & Cultural Centre's Programming Advisory Committee, and the 2015 Pan Am Games Cultural Advisory Committee. Che has been recognized as Marketing Magazine's One-To-Watch, a Toronto Community Foundation's 'Vital People' and most recently being awarded the Mayor's Cultural Leadership award.

 

Jesse Kumagai

 

Jesse Kumagai is the VP, Talent for Live Nation Canada and was Director of Programming for The Corporation of Massey Hall & Roy Thomson Hall for more than a decade. In addition to his professional duties, Jesse has been an active volunteer currently serving as the Chair of Music Canada Live and a member of the Unison Benevolent Fund Board.  He is the former Vice-Chair of the Yonge Dundas Square Board of management, a former board member of CAPACOA and the Small World Music Society.

 

Robert Lanni

 

Rob Lanni (with Eric Lawrence) co-founded Coalition Music in the late '80s - a full-service management company.  The current client roster includes artists Our Lady Peace, Simple Plan, Finger Eleven, USS, Justin Nozuka, The Balconies, Andee and Ben Caplan.  In 2010, Coalition Music purchased and renovated a 12,000 square foot building in Scarborough (a former convent) that is home to Canada's Music Incubator (not-for-profit) and TEMPO (Through Education Music Provides Opportunity) charity.

 

Alexander Mair

 

Mr. Mair committed his entire career to the support of Canadian artists.  After managing Gordon Lightfoot for eight years, he launched Attic Records. Attic earned 114 gold, platinum and multiplatinum records.  Successful Canadian artists included Triumph, the Nylons, Lee Aaron, Downchild Blues Band, Haywire and many more.  Attic invested over $30 million in developing and marketing Canadian artists, and generate over $30 million in foreign royalty revenue that flowed back to Canada.

 

Amanda Martinez

 

Amanda Martinez is a Toronto-based singer/songwriter whose music exultingly blends her unique Mexican and South African roots with flamenco soul.  Her solo CDs have garnered her multiple nominations for Latin Jazz Performer of the Year, and her songs have appeared on three Putumayo world music collections: Bossanova Around the World, Latin Dreamland and most recently, Cafe Latino. Her third and latest CD "Mañana" helmed by GRAMMY-winning producer Javier Limón.

 

Mervon Mehta

 

Mervon Mehta's career in the arts has seen him on both sides of the curtain as an actor and music executive. He has performed around the world programmed for some of the most significant music venues in the US and Canada.

 

Noah Mintz

 

Noah Mintz is the owner of and a Senior Mastering Engineer at Lacquer Channel Mastering. Since 1975, Lacquer Channel Mastering has been one of Canada's premier mastering studios. Combining the best of vintage and state-of-the-art technology, Lacquer Channel currently has Canada's only operating record lathe. Previous to Mastering, Noah was the singer and guitar player of the influential 90's indie rock band, hHead.

 

Miranda Mulholland

 

Classically trained on violin and in voice, Miranda is a versatile performer and in high demand as a fiddler and singer covering a wide range of styles. She is a member of Great Lake Swimmers and Belle Starr and released her debut solo album in 2014. She is the owner of a boutique record label, Roaring Girl Records.

 

Rodney Murphy

 

Rodney Murphy is the Education and Outreach Manager for SOCAN - the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada. He has been working on behalf of Canadian songwriters with SOCAN for the past 12 years providing extensive copyright and music industry education in an effort to maximize their performance royalties and music revenue. Before joining SOCAN, Rodney worked for CKCU FM in Ottawa, Sony Music Canada and BBC Radio One in the UK.  He has a Master's degree in Media Studies.

 

Errol Nazareth

 

Errol has been playing with words professionally for nearly 30 years.  He began writing about the city's diverse music scenes for the Scarborough Mirror and went on to cover them for The Toronto Sun, CBC Radio and various local and national music publications. Errol is a regular contributor to CBC's Metro Morning - the city's top rated morning show - as well as Big City Small World - which focuses on the local music and culture scenes.

 

Jeffrey Remedios

 

Jeffrey is the Toronto based president and co-founder of Arts & Crafts, one of the top independent music companies with office in Toronto, Los Angeles and Mexico. Jeffrey oversees all aspects of the company's business, establishing A&C as a global music brand.  Rolling Stone Magazine recently cited Jeffrey as a key insider shaping the future of the music business. Jeffrey is the promoter and founder of the Toronto's Field Trip Music & Arts Festival.

 

Roberta Smith

 

Roberta Smith is the Chief Operating Officer at the Toronto Symphony Orchestra. Ms. Smith has been with the TSO for 20 years and, most recently, provided leadership as Interim President & CEO. Ms. Smith spent the early part of her career developing education programs for young people in the GTA. She was awarded the John Hobday Award in Arts Management in 2009 by the Canada Council for the Arts. Ms. Smith holds a Masters in Musicology from University of Toronto, and an MBA from the Schulich School of Business.

 

Spencer Sutherland

 

R. D. Spencer Sutherland is an innovative entrepreneur in the entertainment and media sector.  His work has been showcased in Science centres and museums around the world.  He currently serves as Chairman of the Queen St West BIA since 2010, also member of the TABIA Board of Directors since 2011, and member of the Toronto Music Advisory Council since 2014.  He also owns Nocturne, a live electronic music venue in downtown Toronto, and has co-produced over 1200 events since 2009.

 

Patti-Anne Tarlton

 

Current Chief Operating Officer Ticketmaster Canada, Patti-Anne has a deep understanding of the North American Live Entertainment Industry having spent her career as a concert promoter, venue operator and sports and entertainment executive in Vancouver, Montreal and Toronto.  Most recently, Tarlton headed up Live Entertainment Division for Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment.

 

Andrew Weir

 

Andrew currently serves as Executive Vice President of Tourism Toronto, responsible for global marketing and communications to elevate Toronto as a destination for leisure and business travelers. Andrew has also served as a Communications Director for an Ontario Cabinet Minister and was a communications consultant in the health care industry.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to have City Council appoint members of the public to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 5, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Appointment of Members to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council (TMAC)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77657.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of recommended candidates for the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council (TMAC)
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary

CA4.4 - Appointment of Members to the Toronto Film, Television and Commercial Production Industry Committee (Toronto Film Board)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Film, Television and Commercial Production Industry Committee (Toronto Film Board)

Committee Recommendations

The Civic Appointments Committee recommends that: 

 

1. City Council appoint the following candidates to the Toronto Film Board, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018:

 

-Jonathan Ahee

 

-Maxine Bailey

 

-Douglas Barrett

 

-David Carter

 

-Ken Dhaliwal

 

-Shelley Eriksen

 

-Valerie Fox

 

-Victoria Harding

 

-David Hardy

 

-Sarah Ker-Hornell

 

-Louis Major

 

-Peter Miller

 

-Jim Mirkopoulos

 

-Roger Nair

 

-Warren Ross

 

-Brian Simpson

 

-Jennifer Stewart

 

-Mimi Wolch

 

2. City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 2 to the report (March 5, 2015) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Toronto Film Board.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

Candidates' biographies:

 

Jonathan Ahee

 

Since 2004 Jonathan Ahee has been President of NABET 700 UNIFOR.  As President, Jonathan is responsible for overall operations, including negotiation, application and interpretation of collective agreements and the employment interests of over 2,000 film, television and new media technicians representing in excess of $50 million in wages annually.

 

Maxine Bailey

 

Maxine Bailey is the Vice-President of Advancement for TIFF, Toronto's leading film institution. She serves as TIFF's principal liaison for government partners, donors, supporters, and members, who together contribute 26% of the organization's revenue. Passionate about Toronto's cultural life.  Bailey co-founded the Black Artists Network in Dialogue (BAND) and serves on boards/committees for ArtsVote, the Linden School for Girls, and many more.

 

Douglas Barrett

 

Doug Barrett is a veteran of Canada's media industry.  In the 80s and 90s, he was a leading Canadian media and entertainment lawyer.  For most of the 2000s, Douglas was the President and CEO of one of Canada's largest professional motion picture equipment rental houses.  Since 2008 he has held a Chair at the Schulich School of Business as the Bell Media Professor of Media Management.  Over the years he has served on many industry boards.

 

Suzanna Birchwood

 

Suzanna Birchwood is a strategic planning expert who works at the Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General.   Engaged in both her local downtown community and in international public affairs, Suzanna has 10+ years of experience serving on public and non-profit boards, for both arts and social services.

 

David Carter

 

David Carter is President of Canada Film Capital (CFC), which is Canada's leading film and television tax incentive financing and administration company servicing the Canadian film industry from coast to coast. He is the primary point-of-contact at CFC for its clients, the production finance and physical production executives at the major studios, independents and VFX houses. David has a B.Sc. and is a CPA and CA (Canada), and a CPA and CGMA (USA).

 

Marc Cormier

 

Born in Saint-Pierre et Miquelon, Marc studied the biological sciences in Bordeaux, France before moving to Toronto. In 1991 Marc began a career in education which took him from the classroom to administration. Marc has been involved in one of Toronto's Film Festivals since 2005 as a web designer, programmer, print coordinator, content manager as well as board member and board president.

 

Ken Dhaliwal

 

Ken Dhaliwal is a partner at Dentons (Toronto) with a focus on media, entertainment and intellectual property law. Ken's clients are involved in a wide range of activities from financing to production and distribution. He acts for banks, film and television producers, distributors, broadcasters as well as creators and artists. Ken has been rated as "most frequently recommended" in the annual Canadian Legal Expert Directory.

 

Shelley Eriksen

 

Shelley Eriksen is a Toronto-based writer-executive producer with experience in drama and comedy series, movies of the week, and limited series.  Credits include "Continuum," "Rookie Blue," "Bomb Girls," and many others.

 

Valerie Fox

 

Valerie Fox is the Executive Director of the Digital Media Zone at Ryerson University (DMZ). She was responsible for its development and opening in April of 2010. Since then, the DMZ has grown to become Canada's largest university incubator and multi-disciplinary co-working space. Valerie's a user experience designer, coach and facilitator of change in the digital economy.

 

Victoria Harding

 

Victoria Harding has been a respected member of Toronto's film and television community since 1988.  By the age of 26, Victoria was one of the youngest location managers in Toronto and editor of the Directors Guild of Canada's (DGC) national magazine.  In 2001, Valerie was elected to the DGC Executive Board and started production managing with producer Kevin Lafferty, a relationship which continued until she joined the staff of the DGC Ontario in 2013 as Associate Executive Director.

 

David Hardy

 

David Hardy studied history, political studies and varsity hockey at Queen's University, which he shortly thereafter parlayed into a lucrative career as a free-lance film industry worker.  David's various industry jobs and volunteer board positions have left him an astute, diplomatic and accomplished executive who has built an extensive network of industry and government contacts through his diverse industry work experience.

  

Sarah Ker-Hornell

 

A seasoned industry executive with extensive business development, marketing and public policy experience, Ms. Ker-Hornell holds a BA from the University of Toronto. Other notable honours include Canadian Women's Who's Who, Canada's Who's Who and the University of Toronto Arbor Award for Mentorship. Ker-Hornell sits on a variety of Industry Boards and Committees, including the Ontario Media Development Corporation Screen-based Advisory Council and the Toronto Board of Trade, Municipal Committee.

 

Louis Major

 

Louis has 30 years of International sales and business experience in the motion picture business. Louis' current role is as Vice-President at Technciolor Canada, Inc. Louis oversees post production facilities servicing feature film, television broadcast and commercials in Vancouver, Toronto and Montreal. Louis has held many positions within the post-production business: online editor, technical supervisor, sales executive and business unit manager.

 

Peter Miller

 

Peter Miller is a lawyer and engineer with over 20 years of media and telecommunications industry experience, in both private practice and senior executive positions.  Since 2005, Peter has acted as an advisor to select clients in both the public and private sectors, specializing in business and policy development, as well as counsel.  He also serves as Chair of Interactive Ontario, the trade association representing the interests of Ontario's digital media sector.

 

Dimitrios Jim Mirkopoulos

 

Jim Mirkopoulos is VP of Cinespace Film Studios, North America's largest owner and operator of film, TV and digital media production space, liaising directly with the production heads of major Hollywood studios and Canada's leading production entities.  Since 2013 he has been a Director of 3doo, the world's largest streaming platform for 3D content, and he advises both York University and Sheridan College on their film and media programs. He holds an MBA from the Schulich School of Business.

 

Roger Nair

 

Roger Nair is the CEO of Roger Nair Productions, a company established to facilitate the production and distribution of domestic and foreign films as well as management of large scale events. A career film maker, human rights activist, and consultant; Mr. Nair started his career over eighteen years ago. Since then, Mr. Nair Mr. Nair has organized several events contributing to the success story for Toronto being a choice for holding international events in the entertainment business arena.

 

Warren Ross

 

Warren Ross is the National Director, Industrial Relations at the Canadian Media Production Association (CMPA), where he provides strategic and operational oversight of labour relations within the film, television and digital media industry. Warren also plays a leadership role in the advancement of key legislative priorities on behalf of CMPA members. Warren has a law degree from the University of Windsor and a BA (Hons.) in Media, Information and Technoculture from Western University.

 

Brian Simpson

 

A business graduate of Rotmans (U of T) and lawyer who entered entertainment field in 2006 becoming CEO of Keyframe Digital Productions; Board member of Innovate Niagara, Niagara Film Festival, and current President of the Computer Animation Studios of Ontario.  Brian is currently President of CityFX, a visual effects house; President of Surface2Air, a film Production Company, and still practices law primarily in the entertainment field.

 

Jennifer Stewart

 

Jennifer was educated at York University and graduated with a degree in art history.  A lifelong lover of the arts in all their forms, her professional path has taken her to work at Virgin Records, Malofilm Distribution, the CBC, in various capacities and now as Director of Marketing and Development at The Academy of Canadian Cinema and Television. Jennifer has forged strong relationships in the screen based media sector with producers, distributors, film makers and content creators.

 

Mimi Wolch

 

Mimi Wolch is currently the Director, Independent and Broadcast Production, with ACTRA Toronto. Mimi continues her efforts to promote Toronto as a world-class filming destination, assists in bringing foreign productions to the province, while simultaneously helping to grow the local screen-based industry. She is a committed advocate for workers in the Ontario screen-based industry. Ms. Wolch began her long career in film and television as a script supervisor.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to have City Council appoint members of the public to the Toronto Film Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 5, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on Appointment of Members to the Toronto Film, Television and Commercial Production Industry Committee (Toronto Film Board)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-77700.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - List of recommended candidates for the Toronto Film Board
Confidential Attachment 2 - Confidential Voluntary Diversity Information Summary

Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 2

CD2.1 - Toronto Fire Services - 2015 to 2019 Master Fire Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct that the 2015-2019 Master Fire Plan be amended to include a strong commitment to equity hiring and a diverse workforce.

 

2.  City Council adopt the 2015-2019 Master Fire Plan set out in Revised Attachment 1 of the report (February 27, 2015) from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, as amended by Recommendation 1 above.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee requested the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee:

 

1.  at its September 17, 2015 meeting on:

 

a.  recommendations on addressing response delays for high rise buildings in preparation for the 2016 Budget;

 

b.  infractions found as part of the Multi-Residential Apartment Building (MRAB) team including the type and number of violations and the number of prosecutions;

 

c.  a 2015 - 2019 diversity employment strategy, such report to include, but not be limited to:

 

i.  baseline employment date;

 

ii.  annual hiring and recruitment goals;

 

iii.  enhanced human resource strategies to achieve the goals;

 

iv.  a regular reporting timetable to the Community Development and Recreation Committee; and

 

v.  the education and training requirements to become a candidate for employment by Toronto Fire Services, such report to include a review of changes to the requirements in recent years, an analysis of the cost to potential candidates to meet the requirements, and the extent to which the costs present a barrier to achieving greater diversity in Toronto Fire Services.

 

2.  in the first quarter of 2016 on the development of measurable and quantitative key performance indicators as part of the 2015 to 2019 Master Fire Plan.

 

3.  on the status of the Exhibition Place Station and truck.

 

The Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, gave a presentation to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on Toronto Fire Services 2015 - 2019 Master Fire Plan.

Origin

(February 27, 2015) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services

Summary

The Toronto Fire Services (TFS) 2015-2019 Master Fire Plan supports the Division's ongoing efforts to increase fire safety and fire prevention through education and prevention mechanisms and to provide high quality, efficient, and effective emergency response such that life safety outcomes are improved for all residents across the city.

 

The Master Fire Plan provides strategic direction for TFS and outlines the critical initiatives that TFS will implement over the next five years in order to achieve its strategic objectives. The strategic objectives include keeping communities safe, empowering people, strengthening partnerships and improving performance.

 

The Master Fire Plan addresses a number of major issues which form the basis of the work to be carried out over the five year term of the plan. This includes technological improvements, accreditation through the Commission on Fire Accreditation International (CFAI) as well as a number of service priorities such as vertical growth, densification and congestion, diversity, fiscal sustainability, and the importance of fire prevention and public education.

 

Guiding divisional priorities and investments over the next five years and beyond, the Master Fire Plan is intended to align TFS service and priorities in preparation for the accreditation process and to prepare TFS for a commitment to continuous improvement. The Plan will act as the foundation and transition document to support TFS' upcoming application for accreditation through the CFAI. 

Background Information (Committee)

(February 27, 2015) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, on Toronto Fire Services - 2015 to 2019 Master Fire Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-77760.pdf
(February 27, 2015) Attachment 1 - 2015 to 2019 Master Fire Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-77761.pdf
(February 27, 2015) Revised Attachment 1 - 2015 to 2019 Master Fire Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-78039.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Presentation from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Fire Services, on Toronto Fire Services - 2015 - 2019 Master Fire Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-78180.pdf

Speakers

Tony Araujo
Miguel Avila
Frank Ramagnano, President, Toronto Professional Fire Fighters' Association
Councillor Mike Layton
Councillor Joe Cressy
Councillor Sarah Doucette
Councillor John Campbell

Communications (Committee)

(March 23, 2015) Submission from Tony Araujo (CD.New.CD2.1.1)

CD2.2 - Infrastructure and Service Improvement Plan for the Emergency Shelter System

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Director, Real Estate Services, to assist Shelter, Support and Housing Administration staff to identify appropriate facilities for use as the 15 potential new emergency shelter sites, both temporary and permanent, that will be needed in the next five years.

 

2. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to work with the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Equity, Diversity and Human Rights to identify strategies to increase the number of physically accessible shelter beds available.

 

3. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to report through the 2016 budget process on the impacts of the strategies identified in this report in achieving a 90 percent occupancy target in each emergency shelter sector, and the implications for additional resources needed.

 

4. City Council refer the report (March 9, 2015) from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, in particular the workplan on a Mental Health and Substance Use strategy in shelters, to the Board of Health for information.

 

5. City Council request the Federal and Provincial Governments provide additional funding to create additional supportive housing spaces for long term shelter users with significant health, mental health and addiction issues.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Community Development and Recreation Committee requested the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to:

 

1.   Report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on:

a. the adequacy of Provincial and Federal funding, and areas where the City should be requesting enhanced or new funding;

b. strategies to improve the ability of the City to locate and relocate shelters in an efficient and community sensitive way; and further that the Community Engagement Best Practices for Emergency Shelters be amended and updated to include clear timelines; and

c. progress of the Infrastructure and Service Improvement Plan on a semi-annual basis.

2.  Review the drop-in programs funded by the City with a view to analyzing their efficiency in homelessness prevention and possible enhanced funding.

 

3.  Review sites at risk, in consultation with Real Estate Services, and report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on:

a.  strategies to maintain existing shelter locations; and

b.  potential acquisition sites to secure the system.

The General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration gave a presentation to the Community Development and Recreation Committee on Infrastructure and Service Improvement Plan for the Emergency Shelter System.

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

This report sets out an infrastructure and service improvement plan to guide transformation of the emergency shelter system. This plan reflects the City's Housing First approach to ending homelessness by assisting people to move from emergency shelter into permanent housing as quickly as possible, while recognizing the importance of maintaining a robust and responsive emergency shelter system to provide assistance to people in crisis. The plan also supports the City's Poverty Reduction Strategy.

 

The report provides a detailed overview of the emergency shelter system in a city that is seeing less and less affordable housing, rising property values, and increased poverty. It discusses how the system is structured, who uses it and current service use trends. It highlights areas that need to be changed in order for client needs to continue to be met in an effective and efficient manner. This analysis lays the foundation for a range of proposed actions, including:

 

-  Development of a new program that focuses on housing long term shelter users to free up shelter beds for their original emergency purpose. The report outlines a range of Housing First approaches to achieve this objective, including partnership opportunities with Local Health Integration Networks (LHINs) to provide housing and supports for clients with complex physical, mental health and substance use issues.

 

-  An overview of the additional shelter capacity required to meet a 90 percent occupancy target in each emergency shelter sector, while also responding to the need for relocation of multiple existing shelter sites, including those related to George Street Revitalization and the displacement of existing shelters caused by real estate development initiatives. The report sets out a clear process for identifying and seeking approval for new shelter sites that will be needed, and outlines a plan for the capital investments required.

 

-  An update on a number of strategic initiatives underway to improve access and the effective operation of the emergency shelter system. These include updating the Shelter Standards, review of the use of transitional shelter programs, development of an enhanced centralized access system for emergency shelters, development of a harm reduction framework and development of strategic performance indicators and a new funding model that creates incentives to support clients in moving to permanent housing.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Report and Attachments 1-13 from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, on Infrastructure and Service Improvement Plan for the Emergency Shelter System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-77792.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Presentation - from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, on Infrastructure and Service Improvement Plan for the Emergency Shelter System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-78163.pdf

Speakers

Johnny Smash
Derek George
Joyce Rankin, Street Health
John Clarke, Ontario Coalition Against Poverty
Mark Aston, Fred Victor/Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness
Susan Gapka
Councillor John Campbell

Communications (Committee)

(March 23, 2015) Submission from Mark Aston, Executive Director of Fred Victor (CD.New.CD2.2.1)

CD2.3 - Progress Report on Implementation of 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CD2.3.3 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to develop an online housing help portal which would function as a coordinated access point for social and affordable housing options and housing help resources that can be accessed online, to be launched in the fourth quarter 2015.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration to expand the centralized choice based system for the allocation of rent-geared-to-income (RGI) units to also include other housing benefit options including housing allowances, rent supplements and below market rent units, and begin implementation and report back on progress in the first quarter 2016.

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration

Summary

The purpose of this report is to update Community Development and Recreation Committee (CDRC) on the implementation status of the 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework (HSSPF), which was unanimously adopted by City Council in December 2013. The HSSPF guides Shelter, Support and Housing Administration (SSHA) and its partners in the planning, management and delivery of housing and homelessness services over a five year period.

 

The report provides a high level overview of the actions being taken to respond to the nine strategic directions identified in the framework. Taken together, these actions are intended to transform the existing service system: from one based on historic funding program silos and focused on emergency responses to homelessness and administration of downloaded social housing programs to an integrated client-centered, outcome-focused service system that addresses homelessness and improves the housing stability of Torontonians.

 

Ongoing broad based engagement is a cornerstone of the service planning framework. This report describes how staff are engaging with the Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness (TAEH) – a community based multi-stakeholder group – on approaches and priorities within the service planning framework. A key product of this engagement in 2014 was the definition of objectives, phased milestones, and performance indicators, that form the basis for the implementation plan outlined in this report.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration on Progress Report on Implementation of 2014-2019 Housing Stability Service Planning Framework
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-77825.pdf

Speakers

Alexander Zsager, Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness
Mark Aston, Fred Victor/Toronto Alliance to End Homelessness
Keith Hambly, Co-Chair, Toronto HIV/AIDS Network (THN), and Executive Director, Fife House

Communications (Committee)

(March 23, 2015) Submission from Keith Hambly, Co-Chair Toronto HIV/AIDS Network - (THN) and Executive Director, Fife House (CD.New.CD2.3.1)
(March 23, 2015) Submission from Mark Aston, Executive Director of Fred Victor (CD.New.CD2.3.2)

Communications (City Council)

(March 26, 2015) E-mail from Peter Clarke (CC.Supp.CD2.3.3)

CD2.5 - Investment Funding Programs - 2015 Allocation Recommendations (Community Festivals and Special Events, Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Festivals and Events and Community Recreation)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Community Development and Recreation Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council approve allocations for the following three Investment Funding programs, as recommended in Appendices A and B to the report (March 9, 2015) from the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, subject to the approval of the 2015 Recommended Operating Budget for Social Development, Finance and Administration:

 

a.  a total of $122,000 to 15 organizations for the 2015 Community Festivals and Special Events Investment Program;

 

b.  a total of $560,000 to 23 organizations for the 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Festivals and Events - Local Animation Through Collaboration; and

 

c.  a total of $460,000 to 15 organizations for the Community Recreation Investment Funding Program.

 

2.  City Council direct that an amount of $70,000 be held for appeals for the annual Community Festivals and Community Recreation Investment Programs.

Origin

(March 9, 2015) Report from the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report recommends funding for the following three 2015 Investment Funding programs:

 

i.  Community Festivals and Special Events Investment Program;

 

ii.  Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Festivals and Events - Local Animation Through Collaboration (Pan Am Festivals and Events); and

 

iii.  Community Recreation Investment Funding Program (Community Recreation).

 

Of the 230 applications received for these three programs, 53 are recommended for funding in the amount of $1,142,000.  An additional $70,000 has been held for appeals for the annual Community Festivals and Community Recreation Investment Funding programs.

 

Grants help the City of Toronto achieve its social, economic and cultural goals for its residents. The City's goals are better achieved by supporting the work of organizations that are closer to the communities they serve.

 

Community Investment programs provide time-limited funding to established and emerging not-for-profit groups in the City of Toronto to test new ideas or enhance existing models that lead to meaningful change in organizations and communities.

 

The Pan Am Festivals and Events funding aims to enhance the experience of the Games while advancing the City's goals for sport development and healthy living, resident engagement and cultural celebration, and economic development and tourism.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 9, 2015) Report and Appendix A from the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, on Investment Funding Programs - 2015 Allocation Recommendations (Community Festivals and Special Events, Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Festivals and Events and Community Recreation)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-77788.pdf
(March 9, 2015) Appendix B: 2015 Allocation Recommendations: Community Festivals and Special Events Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Festivals and Events, Community Recreation Program Project Summary Sheets and Summary of Declined Applications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-77790.pdf

Economic Development Committee - Meeting 2

ED2.1 - Economic Dashboard - Annual Summary, 2015

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the report (February 11, 2015) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture for information.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The General Manager, Economic Development and Culture gave a presentation to the Economic Development Committee.

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture

Summary

This report provides an annual summary of the data reported each month in the Toronto Economic Dashboard, which benchmarks the city's economic performance.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 11, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture on the Economic Dashboard - Annual Summary, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-76322.pdf
Appendix A - Economic Indices Presentation Highlights
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-77619.pdf
Revised Appendix A: Economic Indices Presentation - Annual Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-77618.pdf
Appendix A: Economic Indices Presentation - Annual Summary
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-76323.pdf
Appendix B: Exchange Rate Sensitive Industries Table
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-76324.pdf
Appendix C: State of Manufacturing in Toronto - 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-76325.pdf

ED2.3 - Expanding the Partnership to Advance Youth Employment (PAYE)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication ED2.3.2 has been submitted on this item

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Employment and Social Services and General Manager, Economic Development and Culture to develop an annual Partnership to Advance Youth Employment (PAYE) Employer Recognition Award.

 

2.  City Council direct the General Manager, Employment and Social Services, to prepare a progress report on the results of efforts to expand the Partnership to Advance Youth Employment (PAYE) to the Economic Development Committee in the First Quarter of 2016.

 

3.  City Council forward the report (February 11, 2015) from the General Manager, Employment and Social Services, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to the following Ministries, Networks, Agencies and Institutions for information:

 

a.  Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, Central Region

b.  Youth Employment Partnership (YEP) Network

c.  Civic Action

d.  United Way Toronto

e.  Toronto Region Board of Trade

f.  Prince’s Charities Canada

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Economic Development Committee:

 

1. Requested the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, in conjunction with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and Executive Director, Social Development Finance and Administration, to report to the April 16, 2015 meeting of the Economic Development Committee with a Youth Employment Action Plan that includes:

 

a. a broad and comprehensive apprenticeship/internship component, including job activities/classes not typically considered; and

 

b. an outcome tracking process that tracks participant outcomes for a 24 to 36 month period, or longer if feasible.

 

The General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services gave a presentation to the Committee along with guest speakers Stephen Upton, Vice President, Tridel Corporation and Nigel Rose, PAYE youth employed at Deloitte Canada.

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services, the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

Several years since the end of a deep and far-reaching recession, youth unemployment remains extremely high in Toronto. Despite a recent decline, at approximately 18 percent youth unemployment is still double the City's overall average unemployment rate and among the highest in the province. Unemployment rates for vulnerable groups, such as racialized youth, newcomers, and youth with lower educational attainment, are significantly higher, as are the rates in some of the City’s poorest neighbourhoods.

 

Addressing youth unemployment requires concerted actions by a range of stakeholders. The Partnership to Advance Youth Employment (PAYE) is central to the City's work to create more opportunities for youth. Working directly with a range of employers, PAYE has evolved into a successful model for increasing access to employment opportunities and vital job preparation supports for youth (aged 18-29) across Toronto.

 

Following a brief overview of PAYE's features and accomplishments, this report highlights a number of actions that are being taken to expand PAYE. In 2015, these steps will double both the number of hiring employers engaged annually from 40 to 80 and the number of youth served from 500 to 1000. In addition, given the scale of youth unemployment, Toronto Employment and Social Services, Economic Development and Culture and Social Development, Finance and Administration are developing a more comprehensive City approach to support youth through employer-led training, work experience, entrepreneurship, and career pathway approaches, among others.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 11, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Toronto Employment and Social Services the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture and the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on Expanding the Partnership to Advance Youth Employment (PAYE)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-76327.pdf
Attachment 1 - The PAYE Process
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-76328.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(February 23, 2015) Letter from Grant Humes, Executive Director, Toronto Financial District Business Improvement Area (BIA) (ED.New.ED2.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/comm/communicationfile-51572.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(March 31, 2015) Submission from Councillor Michael Thompson, Ward 37, Scarborough Centre - information brochure about PAYE (CC.New.ED2.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52123.pdf

ED2.4 - Service Canada Funding for the Toronto Youth Job Corps Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration to sign a contract renewal agreement with Service Canada, upon Service Canada's approval for the City's renewal application, for the Toronto Youth Job Corps program for up to $2,176,898 in federal subsidy with a $220,729 contribution from the City's tax base, and $212,580 contribution from the Social Assistance Stabilization Reserve Fund (XQ1054).

 

2.  The appropriate City Officials take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Report from the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration

Summary

This report seeks authority to renew the agreement with Service Canada for the City-administered Toronto Youth Job Corps (TYJC) program for the 2015 contract year.

 

TYJC provides pre-employment support, structured employment training, employer placement and follow up supports for youth most distant from the labour market. TYJC was initiated in 1983 and has been reviewed and updated to meet both changing youth needs and funding requirements.

 

TYJC is administered by the City of Toronto and delivered by three community agencies selected through an open request for proposals process: JVS Toronto, West Neighbourhood House (formerly St. Christopher House), and West Scarborough Neighbourhood Community Centre.

 

On November 18, 2014, Social Development, Finance and Administration submitted a contract renewal application with an anticipated start date of April 13, 2015.  Service Canada approval for the City's application is expected before March 31, 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 11, 2015) Report from the Acting Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration on the Service Canada Funding for the Toronto Youth Job Corps Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-76329.pdf

ED2.5 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2015 Operating Budgets - Report No. 2

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 8 - York West, 9 - York Centre, 11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 17 - Davenport, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York, 37 - Scarborough Centre, 40 - Scarborough Agincourt, 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Committee Recommendations

The Economic Development Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt and certify the 2015 recommended expenditures and levy requirements of the following Business Improvement Areas as contained in the report (February 11, 2015) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer:

 

Business Improvement Area

2015 Expenditure
Estimates
($)

2015 Levy
Funds Required
($)

Cabbagetown

283,827

191,761

Corso Italia

419,714

201,592

Downtown Yonge

3,247,455

2,508,760

Dufferin-Finch

1,189,368

687,400

Dundas West

234,293

199,933

Eglinton Hill

21,858

21,249

Emery Village

3,000,618

2,505,010

Forest Hill Village

319,229

197,522

Gerrard India Bazaar

261,310

131,920

Kennedy Road

346,881

246,881

Lakeshore Village

92,414

70,445

Leslieville

140,524

110,260

Little Italy

436,161

379,873

Little Portugal

90,195

53,879

Mimico Village

39,999

32,420

Queen Street West

407,546

262,323

Rosedale Main Street

320,996

262,798

Sheppard East Village

169,095

126,256

shoptheQueensway.com

203,814

125,000

St. Clair Gardens

68,995

65,045

The Kingsway

541,268

346,184

Trinity Bellwoods

83,074

51,603

Weston Village

143,788

105,172

Wilson-Keele

306,472

275,580

Wychwood Heights

152,632

75,377

 

2. City Council adopt and certify the 2015 recommended expenditures and levy requirements of the following Business Improvement Areas as contained in the report (February 24, 2015) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer:

 

Business Improvement Area

2015 Expenditure
Estimates
($)

2015 Levy
Funds Required
($)

Midtown Yonge

155,845

155,845

Mount Dennis

35,309

14,544

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer

Summary

This report brings forward Business Improvement Area (BIA) annual operating budgets for approval by City Council as required by the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  City Council approval is required to permit the City to collect funds through the tax levy on behalf of the BIAs.

 

Complete budgets and supporting documentation received by January 28, 2015 have been reviewed and are reported here. BIA Operating Budgets received after this date will be brought forward in later reports.  Of the 78 established BIAs, 50 BIA Budgets are pending City Council approval on February 10, 2015; 25 BIA Budgets are submitted for approval in this report; one BIA Budget will be brought forward as a supplementary report on February 26, 2015; two BIAs are pending submissions; and one BIA is inactive.

 

The recommendations in this report reflect 2015 Operating Budgets approved by the respective BIAs’ Boards of Management and have been reviewed by City staff to ensure BIA budgets reflect Council’s approved policies and practices.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 11, 2015) Report and Appendices A and B from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on the Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2015 Operating Budgets - Report No. 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-76311.pdf

5a - Supplementary Report to Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2015 Operating Budgets - Report No. 2

Origin
(February 24, 2015) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
Summary

This supplementary report brings forward 2 (Midtown Yonge and Mount Dennis) Business Improvement Area (BIA) 2015 Operating Budgets, to be considered with the 25 BIA Operating Budgets in report No. 2, for approval by Council as required by the City of Toronto Act, 2006.  Council approval is required to permit the City to collect funds through the tax levy on behalf of the BIAs.

Background Information (Committee)
(February 24, 2015) Report and Appendices A and B from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer on the Supplementary Report to Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2015 Operating Budgets - Report No. 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-77579.pdf

Government Management Committee - Meeting 2

GM2.3 - Contract Award - Request for Proposal No. 9155-14-7196 Bailiff Services

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Public Notice Given

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council grant authority to the Director, Revenue Services, to negotiate and enter into agreements with S. Wilson & Co. Ltd (the "Recommended Bailiff"), being the highest overall scoring proponent meeting the requirements of Request For Proposal No. 9155-14-7196, to provide contracted professional Bailiff services for the collection of outstanding property taxes on behalf of the Revenue Services Division from the date of award for one year, with the option to renew for four additional one-year periods at the sole discretion of the Director, Revenue Services, on the same terms and conditions.

 

2. City Council grant authority to the Recommended Bailiff to apply a 4% service fee on the total amount of property taxes owing or monies recovered, payable by the taxpayer as a fee for tax collection activities undertaken by the Recommended Bailiff on behalf of the City.

 

3. City Council approve amendments to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 441: Fees and Charges to add the fee set out in Recommendation 2 of the report (January 29, 2015) from the Acting Treasurer.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee recessed its public session and met in closed session to consider confidential information on this item as it relates to the security of the City's or a local board's property, the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, and litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the City or local board.

Origin

(January 29, 2015) Report from the Acting Treasurer

Summary

The purpose of this report is to advise of the results of the Request for Proposal No. 9155-14-7196 for the provision of professional Bailiff Services for the collection of outstanding property taxes and to obtain authority to enter into agreement with the recommended proponent and to set the service fee payable by the taxpayers.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 29, 2015) Report from the Acting Treasurer on Contract Award - Request for Proposal No. 9155-14-7196 Bailiff Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-75200.pdf
(February 9, 2015) Public Notice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-75683.pdf

Speakers

Earl Boeko, President and Partner, Sterling Bailiffs Inc.
Chris Bell, Assistant Bailiff, A.O. Shingler & Company Ltd.

Communications (Committee)

(February 17, 2015) Submission from Earl Boeko, President and Partner, Sterling Bailiffs Inc. (GM.New.GM2.3.1)

GM2.4 - Unsolicited Proposal - GameOnStream

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize Parks, Forestry and Recreation, as the lead division and in accordance with the Unsolicited Proposal Policy, to prepare the necessary documentation for the Purchasing and Materials Management Division to apply the Swiss Challenge procedure to the GameOnStream proposal.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Director of Toronto Office of Partnerships to report back to City Council, through Government Management Committee, with the results of the Swiss Challenge to request authority to negotiate and enter into a licence agreement with the successful proponent.

Origin

(January 7, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships

Summary

The Toronto Office of Partnerships ("TOP") received an unsolicited proposal in 2013 from a private company that has offered to establish and maintain, at no cost to the City, a full service video streaming solution to video stream live and on-demand hockey events from select City of Toronto ("City") arenas. The service involves the installation of fixed cameras in hockey arenas that are supported by both on-site and external servers with content distribution via the internet. The City will receive a percentage of revenue from subscription and advertising revenue generated by the program. This initiative, called GameOnStream ("GOS"), is independently financed by the proponent.

 

Following the initial review of the proposal by TOP with various stakeholders in the City, the Parks, Forestry and Recreation Division ("PFR"), after consultation with the City Clerk's Office regarding the City's privacy policy, deemed the initiative to have merit and indicated an interest in having the cameras installed in various arenas. Having also assessed the prospects of the proposal with relevant corporate staff, the purpose of this report is to request that Council approve the initiative in principle and that the proponent’s plan be subjected to the Swiss Challenge (a specialized Request For Proposal process) as mandated by the City’s Unsolicited Quotations or Proposal Policy.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 7, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships, on Unsolicited Proposal - GameOnStream
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-74724.pdf

GM2.8 - Release of Covenant on Title to 28 Hedgewood Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
Communication GM2.8.5 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - This report involves the security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions.

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council not accept the Offer from Mrs. Narges Ehsani-Armaki (the "Owner") to secure the release of the covenant registered on title to the property known municipally as 28 Hedgewood Road (the "Property") in exchange for payment in the amount of $207,000, exclusive of HST, substantially on the terms and conditions outlined in Appendix B to the report (February 9, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer.
 
2. City Council direct that the confidential information in Appendix C to the report (February 9, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer remain confidential as it contains information relating to the security of property belonging to the City.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Government Management Committee recessed its public session to meet in closed session to consider this item as it relates to the security of property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions, the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege, and litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the City or local board.

Origin

(February 9, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

To obtain authority for the release of a covenant registered on title to 28 Hedgewood Road, prohibiting the use of part of a closed road for the purposes of creating a separate building lot.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 9, 2015) Revised Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on Release of Covenant on Title to 28 Hedgewood Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-76233.pdf
(February 9, 2015) Revised Appendix C - Confidential Attachment on Release of Covenant on Title to 28 Hedgewood Road
(February 2, 2015) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer on Release of Covenant on Title to 28 Hedgewood Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-75606.pdf
(February 2, 2015) Appendix C - Confidential Attachment on Release of Covenant on Title to 28 Hedgewood Avenue

Speakers

Bruce C. Ketcheson, Partner, Ritchie Ketcheson Hart and Biggart, LLP
Graham F. Alloway
David Meyerowitz
Councillor Jaye Robinson

Communications (Committee)

(February 12, 2015) Letter from Bruce C. Ketcheson, Partner, Ritchie Ketcheson Hart and Biggart, LLP (GM.New.GM2.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/comm/communicationfile-51141.pdf
(February 13, 2015) Letter from Diane Salerno, Chair, Development Committee, York Mills Valley Association (GM.New.GM2.8.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/comm/communicationfile-51153.pdf
(February 13, 2015) E-mail from Christine Acconcia (GM.New.GM2.8.3)
(February 17, 2015) Submission from John M. Thomspon O.C. and Graham F. Alloway (GM.New.GM2.8.4)

Communications (City Council)

(March 24, 2015) Letter from Bruce C. Ketcheson, Ritchie Ketcheson Hart & Biggart LLP (CC.Main.GM2.8.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52013.pdf

GM2.9 - 2014 Final Report on Property Sales and Acquisitions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive the report (February 2, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer for information.

Origin

(February 2, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This final report provides an annual overview of property sales and purchases by the City from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014.

 

A synopsis of real estate transactions are included in this report, specifically on properties declared surplus, sale activities, as well as information on property acquisitions by negotiation/expropriation. Also included is a breakdown of real estate transactions processed by delegated authority.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 2, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer on 2014 Final Report on Property Sales and Acquisitions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-75608.pdf
(February 2, 2015) Appendix A - Declare Surplus List
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-75609.pdf
(February 2, 2015) Appendix B - Property Acquisitions / Expropriations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-75610.pdf
(February 2, 2015) Appendix C - Properties Authorized for Sale and for Transfer to Build Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-75611.pdf

GM2.11 - Expropriation of 303, 309 and 311 George Street for the Redevelopment of Seaton House

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Government Management Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council grant authority to initiate the expropriation process for the property interests listed in Appendix A (the "Lands") and shown on the sketches attached as Appendix B to the report (February 2, 2015) from the Chief Corporate Officer.

 

2. City Council grant authority to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Lands, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearing that are received, to attend the hearing to present the City's position, and to report the Inquiry Officer's recommendations to Council for its consideration.

 

3. City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect hereto.

Origin

(February 2, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

This report seeks authority to commence expropriation proceedings for the properties municipally known as 303, 309 and 311 George Street for use in connection with the redevelopment of Seaton House and the revitalization of the George Street neighbourhood.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 2, 2015) Report and Appendices A and B from the Chief Corporate Officer on Expropriation of 303, 309 and 311 George Street for the Redevelopment of Seaton House
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-75605.pdf

Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 2

PE2.1 - Rouge National Urban Park Draft Management Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PE2.1.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council receive the report (February 10, 2015) from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B for information.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The following made a presentation to the Parks and Environment Committee:

 

- John Livey, Deputy City Manager, Cluster B;

 

- Jane Weninger, Senior Planner, Strategic Initiatives, Policy and Analysis, City Planning; and

 

- Pam Veinotte, Field Unit Superintendent, Rouge National Urban Park, Parks Canada.

 

Origin

(February 10, 2015) Report from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B

Summary

The Federal Government is establishing a National Urban Park in the Rouge Valley area of Toronto and York and Durham Regions.  The City of Toronto, along with other municipal land holders, has agreed to transfer land to Parks Canada for inclusion in the park.   The House of Commons, for the Government of Canada, has adopted Bill C-40 An Act respecting the Rouge National Urban Park to provide the legal framework to establish and implement the park. Bill C-40 is currently before the Senate for consideration.  Parks Canada has released the draft Rouge National Urban Park Management Plan (RNUPMP) for public input.  The RNUPMP provides the long-term direction for the management and operation of the park under the legislative framework of Bill C-40.  Once Bill C-40 receives Royal Assent, the management plan will be tabled in the House of Commons for information by the Federal Minister of the Environment.

 

This report responds to City Council's request to address the consistency of the RNUPMP with the environmental policies of existing approved plans that relate to the proposed national park and summarizes staff comments on the RNUPMP and Parks Canada's response.  City staff  recommended:   detailed implementation strategies for natural heritage and archaeology be prepared as part of the park transition phase;  additional information on park governance; reference to the recently executed agreement to collaborate in relation to the Toronto Zoo and proposed Beare Road Park; and additional information on service delivery needs in relation to implementation of the management plan.  Parks Canada has responded that the City's comments will be used to help finalize the management plan for the Rouge National Urban Park, that detailed implementation strategies in support of the management plan will be prepared and that Parks Canada is committed to continuing to work with the City including on park planning, development of implementation strategies, collaboration initiatives and park service delivery.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 10, 2015) Report and Attachments 1 - 4 from the Deputy City Manager, Cluster B, on Rouge National Urban Park Draft Management Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-76309.pdf
(February 25, 2015) Presentation by the Senior Planner, Strategic Initiatives, Policy and Analysis, City Planning, on Rouge National Urban Park Draft Management Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-77601.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(March 23, 2015) Letter from Jim Robb, General Manager, Friends of the Rouge Watershed (CC.Main.PE2.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52011.pdf

PE2.2 - Sponsorship Renewal from The Toronto-Dominion Bank for the Franklin Children's Garden in Toronto Island Park

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council delegate authority to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to accept a sponsorship contribution from The Toronto-Dominion Bank in the amount of $400,000 over the four year period, 2015-2018 in compliance with the City of Toronto Sponsorship Policy, and to allocate the sponsorship funding for the purpose of enhancing garden elements and developing educational materials and programming for the Franklin Children's Garden in Toronto Island Park.

 

2.  City Council renew the naming rights to the TD Storybook Place in the Franklin Children's Garden for the period governed by this sponsorship, 2015-2018 contingent upon the sponsorship being approved and received.

 

3.  City Council authorize the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to negotiate and enter into an Agreement with The Toronto-Dominion Bank that defines the terms and conditions of use for the sponsor funding at The Franklin Children's Garden, all in a form and content satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the City Solicitor.

 

4.  City Council increase the 2015 Council Approved Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $0.100 million gross and $0 net contingent upon the sponsorship being approved and received; and that the 2016 to 2018 Operating Budgets for Parks, Forestry and Recreation include $0.100 million gross and $0 net in each year to reflect this sponsorship.

Origin

(February 5, 2015) Report from General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek approval from City Council to accept a sponsorship contribution of $400,000 from The Toronto-Dominion Bank over a four year period, 2015-2018, to support refurbishment of garden elements and the development of educational materials and programming for the Franklin Children's Garden in Toronto Island Park. As part of accepting this sponsorship, The Toronto-Dominion Bank would be granted a renewal of the naming rights for the TD Storybook Place within the Franklin Children's Garden for the same four year period, 2015-2018.

 

This entire project will be fully funded by the sponsorship from The Toronto-Dominion Bank.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 5, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, on Sponsorship Renewal from The Toronto-Dominion Bank for the Franklin Children's Garden in Toronto Island Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-75973.pdf

PE2.3 - Contract with Lands and Forests Consulting to Carry Out the Prescribed Burn Program

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 13 - Parkdale-High Park

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council grant authority for the issuance of a Sole Source Contract to 1313135 Ontario Inc., carrying on business as "Lands and Forests Consulting" in the total amount of $73,703.00, net of all applicable taxes and charges ($75,000.00 Net of HST recoveries) for services provided from March 1, 2015 to December 1, 2015, with the option to renew the contract for up to four additional one-year terms at the sole discretion of, and on terms and conditions (including price), satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the City Solicitor, and subject to budget approval.

Origin

(February 10, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to enter into a Sole Source Contract with 1313135 Ontario Inc., carrying on business as "Lands and Forests Consulting" for the provision of planning and implementing the prescribed burn program for a period of five (5) years from the effective date of the signed agreement and for the amount of $73,703.00 net of all applicable taxes and charges ($75,000.00 net of HST recoveries). Lands and Forests Consulting have worked with the City to plan and implement a total of 19 prescribed park burns since 2001.

                 

Lands and Forests Consulting has extensive experience both planning and executing various high complexity burns in southern Ontario. No other vendors will be able to match the qualifications required for high complexity burning, and it is for that reason that Urban Forestry is requesting support to continue to enter into a sole source contract with Lands and Forests Consulting to carry out prescribed burns in select Toronto parks.

 

City Council approval is required in accordance with City of Toronto, Municipal Code Chapter 195, Purchasing, where the current request has exceeded the Chief Purchasing Official's authority of the cumulative five (5) year commitment limit under Section 1 of the Purchasing By-Law.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 10, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management, on Contract with Lands and Forests Consulting to Carry Out the Prescribed Burn Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-76300.pdf

PE2.5 - Extending Outdoor Skating Season in the City of Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Parks and Environment Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to include cold weather contingency funds into the 2016 Operating Budget to extend the outdoor skating season when weather permits.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to report to the May 19, 2015 Parks and Environment Committee meeting on the status of this direction.

Origin

(February 24, 2015) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher, Ward 30, Toronto-Danforth

Summary

Last year, the Parks and Environment Committee adopted motion PE26.5 "Allowing Flexibility in the Operating Budget for Municipal Skating Rinks", which requested:

 

1. The General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to consider including "cold weather" contingency funds, including the use of corporate and private sector partners, into the 2015 Operating Budget to extend the outdoor skating and skiing season when weather permits

 

Pleasure skating and shinny are well-loved winter sports, and in an exceptionally cold winter such as this Torontonians expect their City to ensure the skating season continues with the weather. Instead, Torontonians have seen a last minute scramble to keep rinks open, announced sponsorships, cancelled sponsorships, then new sponsorships announced rather than a well-planned extension of the season as anticipated by the motion above.

 

The City of Toronto needs a firm policy to ensure that rinks remain accessible to our communities throughout the cold season in a reasonable, dependable manner. Groups who permit for shinny and other activities need advance notice of the length of the season in order to organize themselves accordingly.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 24, 2015) Letter from Councillor Paula Fletcher on Extending Outdoor Skating Season in the City of Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-77600.pdf
Submission from Councillor Paula Fletcher - Parks and Environment Committee Decision on Item PE26.5 considered on March 3, 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-77604.pdf

Speakers

Andrea Demchuk
Councillor Paula Fletcher

Communications (Committee)

(February 25, 2015) Submission from Andrea Demchuk (PE.New.PE2.5.1)

Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 2

PG2.1 - Technical Amendments to City-wide By-law 569-2013 to Address Specific Appeals

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communications PG2.1.5 and PG2.1.6 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council enact amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 substantially in accordance with Attachment 1 to the report (January 26, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the amendments to Zoning By-law 569-2013 as may be required.

Origin

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

As part of the process of enacting the new City-wide Zoning By-law, a Transition Protocol was established with criteria to determine which properties would be left out of the new Zoning By-law. One category in the Protocol refers to sites with complete applications for a zoning by-law amendment. Another involves lands with complete applications for site plan approval. Due to the time required to produce the Zoning By-law map for the May 7-10, 2013 meeting of City Council, staff were unable to identify and remove sites that had submitted complete applications prior to the City-wide Zoning By-law enactment on May 9, 2013.

 

This report proposes amendments to remove lands from Zoning By-law 569- 2013 that had complete applications and met the Transition Protocol criteria, but were not removed prior to Council enactment of the by-law. In addition, the correction of a number of minor typographical errors and corrections to zoning labels and zoning boundaries is also being recommended through this amending by-law. The amendments proposed will address 12 appeals to By-law 569-2013.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 26, 2015) Report and Attachment 1 from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Technical Amendments to City-wide By-law 569-2013 to Address Specific Appeals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76139.pdf
(January 29, 2015) Notice of Public Meeting to be Held by the Planning and Growth Management Committee (Under the Planning Act)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76180.pdf

Speakers

John McDermott, McDermott and Associates Limited
Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto

Communications (Committee)

(February 23, 2015) Letter from Robert Doumani, Aird & Berlis LLP (PG.New.PG2.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51366.pdf
(February 23, 2015) Letter from John M. Alati, Davies Howe Partners LLP (PG.New.PG2.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51563.pdf
(February 23, 2015) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair and William Roberts, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations (PG.New.PG2.1.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51539.pdf
(February 24, 2015) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Stikeman Elliott LLP (PG.New.PG2.1.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51570.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(March 3, 2015) Letter from Eileen P. K. Costello, Aird & Berlis LLP (CC.Main.PG2.1.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-51973.pdf
(February 25, 2015) Letter from Calvin Lantz, Strikeman Elliott LLP (CC.Main.2.1.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52008.pdf

PG2.3 - Wood-Frame Construction Fire Safety Practices

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council request the Province of Ontario move expeditiously on a provincial regulatory strategy for site safety practices during the construction of combustible buildings.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.  Requested  the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services to meet with representatives of the building industry, including the Building Industry and Land Development Association and the Canadian Wood Council, and other stakeholders, to: 

 

a. Review best practices, including those from British Columbia, regarding fire safety on construction sites with combustible buildings, and National Building Code proposals;

 

b. Collaboratively develop an approach for construction site fire safety practices; and

 

c. Examine possible implementation mechanisms for the guideline document, including the potential development of a City of Toronto by-law, in consultation with the City Solicitor. 

 

2.  Requested the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building in consultation with the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services, to report to the September 3, 2015 Planning and Growth Management Committee meeting on the development of an approach for construction site fire safety practices.

Origin

(February 2, 2015) Report from Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building

Summary

The purpose of this report is to respond to the Planning and Growth Management Committee's direction to the Chief Building Official to report on the need for City Council to request that the province move forward with a framework to mitigate the risk of fire during the construction of combustible buildings.  Since January 1, 2015, the Ontario Building Code has permitted the construction of wood-frame buildings of up to six-storeys.

 

This report recommends that City Council request that the Province of Ontario proceed swiftly with a stakeholder consultation on site safety practices during the construction of combustible buildings for Ontario, similar to the program in place in British Columbia.

 

This report has been prepared in consultation with the Fire Chief, Toronto Fire Services.

Background Information (Committee)

Report from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building on Wood-Frame Construction Fire Safety Practices
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76132.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(February 20, 2015) Letter from Bryan Tuckey, President and Chief Executive Officer, Building Industry and Land Development Association and Joe Vaccaro, Chief Executive Officer, Ontario Home Builders' Association (PG.New.PG2.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51364.pdf

PG2.4 - Committee of Adjustment Continuous Improvement Initiatives

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to review the composition of the Committee of Adjustment and report back to the Executive Committee with recommendations on whether it is advisable to amend Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 4, Committee of Adjustment to periodically enable the rotation of panel members across districts to address application backlogs.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Planning and Growth Management Committee:

 

1.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Chief Corporate Officer to report to the April 13, 2015 meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee on: 

 

a.  the resources needed to provide recordings at all Committee of Adjustment meetings, whether this can be achieved without additional staff,  and how recordings can proceed as soon as possible at all locations where recording equipment is currently available; and

 

b.  the scheduling of all meetings of the Committee of Adjustment in rooms with audio/visual recording equipment and record the meetings. 

 

2.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to give a presentation to the April 13, 2015 meeting of the Planning and Growth Management Committee on E-Service Delivery Program and Application Information Centre for Committee of Adjustment.

 

3.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to hold a roundtable with residents' associations and neighbourhood groups to gather feedback on improvements to the Committee of Adjustment and report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee in the second quarter of 2015 on the results.

 

4.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to report in the second quarter of 2015 to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on Committee of Adjustment improvements, such report to include:

 

a.  The cost implications of extending the public hearing notice area to 80 metres, 100 metres and 120 metres as well as options to defray or fund those costs;

 

b.  A delivery date for City Planning's review of the public notice and the public notice sign associated with the Committee Adjustment;

 

c.  A review of best practices related to public participation and communication from Committee of Adjustments-like processes from comparable jurisdictions outside Ontario;

 

d.  A delivery date for the use of the Application Information Centre by the public for Committee of Adjustment applications; and

 

e.  The feasibility of requiring a new notice and public hearing for any significant revision to a Committee of Adjustment application.

 

5.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report on the implications of expanding the notification area to 120 metres.  Additional cost associated with the expanded notice area are to be recovered through fees charged to applicants. Staff to report back on the timing to implement the expanded area based on when the new fee will be implemented. (merge with above request)

 

6.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to include, in Notices of Variance Applications, information that the application is within a Heritage Conservation District or is on the City's Heritage Registry

 

7.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to provide an annual review and additional training for Committee of Adjustment members on the operation of the Committee of Adjustment, changes to the Official Plan, Zoning By-law and other applicable legislation to assist members in the execution of their responsibilities.

 

8.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to consider designating staff member(s) in the Committee of Adjustment to assist the public with inquiries.

 

9.  Requested the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report on all consent/severance applications to the Committee of Adjustment.

Origin

(February 5, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

This report reviews the operation of the Committee of Adjustment and on-going work program actions intended to improve, among other matters, public awareness of Committee operations, public engagement and member training. The measures to further improve operations are proposed to be implemented in the 2014-2018 term.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 5, 2015) Report and Appendix A from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Committee of Adjustment Continuous Improvement Initiatives
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76151.pdf

Speakers

Councillor Mary Fragedakis
Councillor Jaye Robinson
Councillor Josh Matlow

Communications (Committee)

(February 22, 2015) Letter from Aristotle Christou, The Christou Group (PG.New.PG2.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51363.pdf
(February 23, 2015) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair and William Roberts, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations (PG.New.PG2.4.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51537.pdf
(February 22, 2015) Letter from Eileen Denny, President and Hilde Reis-Smart, Secretary, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (PG.New.PG2.4.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51564.pdf

PG2.6 - Proposed Settlement of Appeals to Official Plan Amendment 199 - Heritage Policies

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt Recommendations 1 and 2 of the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, Legal Services.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information and Recommendations 1 and 2 in Attachment 1 and Attachment 3 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, Legal Services, if adopted.

 

3.  Recommendation 3 in Attachment 1 and Attachment 2 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, Legal Services remain confidential in its entirety.

 

4. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1 and 2 to the Supplementary Report (February 18, 2015), from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, Legal Services.

 

5. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information and recommendations in Attachment 1, and Attachments 2 and 3 to the Supplementary Report (February 18, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, Legal Services, if the confidential recommendations are adopted.

Origin

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, Legal Services

Summary

Official Plan Amendment No. 199 was adopted by City Council as part of the Official Plan Five Year Review on April 3, 2013.  The Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing issued a decision to approve OPA 199 without amendment on November 6, 2014.  Forty-nine appeals of the decision were lodged with the Ontario Municipal Board.  While the majority of the appeals are protective appeals to provide that certain applications be exempted from the policies of OPA 199 there are a number of policy appeals including appeals by the Building Industry and Land Development (BILD) who appealed the amendment in its entirety.

 

The hearing on OPA 199 is scheduled for two weeks commencing March 23, 2015. Through mediation at the Ontario Municipal Board in October 2014 City staff reached tentative settlements on the majority of the policy appeals except for two policies that BILD continues to object to.  The purpose of this report is to seek City Council direction on these proposed settlements.

Background Information (Committee)

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, Legal Services on Proposed Settlement of Appeals to Official Plan Amendment 199 - Heritage Policies
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76166.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Proposed Settlement of Appeals to Official Plan Amendment 199 - Heritage Policy
Confidential Attachment 2 - Outstanding Issues Related to BILD's Appeals to Official Plan Amendment 199 - Heritage Policies
Confidential Attachment 3 - Amendment No. 199 to the Official Plan Incorporating Proposed Settlement Wording

Background Information (City Council)

Confidential Information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning and the City Solicitor - made public on April 13, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-79015.pdf
Confidential Attachment 3 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor - made public on April 13, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-79016.pdf
Confidential Information in Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (February 18, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor - made public on April 13, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-79017.pdf
Confidential Attachment 3 to the supplementary report (February 18, 2015) from the Chief Planner and the Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor - made public on April 13, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-79018.pdf

Speakers

Eileen Denny, Vice-Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto

Communications (Committee)

(February 23, 2015) Letter from Eileen Denny, Vice Chair and William Roberts, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations (PG.New.PG2.6.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51568.pdf

6a - Supplementary Report: Proposed Settlement of Appeals to Official Plan Amendment 199 - Heritage Policies

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board
Origin
(February 18, 2015) Report from Chief Planner and and Executive Director, City Planning and City Solicitor, Legal Services
Summary

This report provides information and recommendations with respect to additional proposed settlements pertaining to Official Plan Amendment No. 199.

 

In the report of January 30, 2015 staff advised that two general appeals submitted by the Building Industry and Land Development (BILD) Association remained unresolved. The first related to the last sentence of Policy 2 in Section 3.1.5 which linked being on the City's Heritage Register to being 'significant' for the purposes of the Provincial Policy Statement.  The second was the use of the term 'feasible' in Policies 36 and 37 in reference to whether archaeological resources could be conserved 'in situ'.  In addition, city staff and BILD representatives were still negotiating on the wording of a sidebar concerning the identification of 'cultural heritage landscapes'. 

 

A further unresolved issue pertained to a City protocol for the identification and review of heritage places of worship that was requested by Council and relates to the settlement of the appeal of the Archdiocese of Toronto.

 

On February 6, 2015 city staff reached a tentative settlement on the remaining outstanding matters related to the policy appeals to OPA 199.  This report seeks Council direction on these additional settlement proposals that if approved will result in a comprehensive settlement of all general policy appeals to OPA 199 eliminating the need for a full hearing of these matters.

Background Information (Committee)
(February 18, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and City Solicitor, Legal Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76781.pdf
Attachment 1: Confidential Information Revisions to Proposed Settlement of Appeals to Official Plan Amendment No. 199 - Heritage Policies
Attachment 2: Confidential Information Further Proposed Settlements of Appeals to Official Plan Amendment No. 199
Attachment 3: Confidential Information Protocol for the Identification and Review of Heritage Places of Worship

PG2.8 - Toronto Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study Prioritization

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the amended Council-approved prioritization system and criteria, as shown in Attachments 1A-16A to the report (February 3, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

2.  City Council authorize a revised West Queen West boundary for study as a potential Heritage Conservation District, and identify the revised area shown in Attachment 1B to the report (February 3, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as the Heritage Conservation District Study Area for the district.

 

3.  City Council authorize the following areas for study as potential Heritage Conservation Districts:  Baby Point, Bloor West Village, Cabbagetown Southwest, the Distillery District, and Kensington Market, and identify the areas shown in Attachments 2B-8B to the report (February 3, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, as the Heritage Conservation District Study Areas for each authorized district.

 

4.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to initiate the study of the West Queen West, Distillery District and Kensington Market districts in 2015, as a result of the application of the prioritization criteria.

 

5.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to initiate the study of Baby Point, Bloor West Village, Cabbagetown Southwest and Casa Loma in 2016, as a result of the application of the prioritization criteria.

 

6.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to review the nomination process for Heritage Conservation Districts and to develop criteria to evaluate the quality and merit of nominations for Heritage Conservation District studies.

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Acting Manager and the Heritage Planner, Heritage Preservation Services, City Planning gave a presentation to the Committee.

Origin

(February 3, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

City Council has supported the development of a prioritization process to determine the sequence in which City Planning will conduct Heritage Conservation District (HCD) studies. This process was developed and adopted by Council in 2012. Nominated HCD study areas are assessed for intensity of development activity, existing level of heritage protection, the overall fragility of the area and City planning priorities as key criteria. Prioritization also takes into account the allocation of staff resources, Council direction and other considerations.

 

Staff have reviewed 16 nominated HCDs. Based on the prioritization analysis, staff have identified three potential HCDs for study in 2015, and five for study in 2016. Staff have also made minor refinements to the methodology for determining priority under each of the criteria, and recommend that potential archaeological resources be added as a fifth criterion.

 

As a result of the prioritization process it is recommended that West Queen West, Kensington Market and the Distillery District be studied as potential heritage conservation districts in 2015. In addition, five potential HCDs have been recommended for study in 2016: Baby Point, Bloor West Village, Cabbagetown Southwest, Casa Loma and the Kingsway.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 3, 2015) Report from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Toronto Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study Prioritization
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76126.pdf
Toronto Heritage Conservation District (HCD) - Attachments 1A - 8B
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-75979.pdf
Toronto Heritage Conservation District (HCD) - Revised Attachments 9A - 16B
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76719.pdf
Toronto Heritage Conservation District (HCD) - Attachments 9A - 16B
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76140.pdf
(February 24, 2015) Presentation from the Acting Manager, City Planning, Heritage Preservation on Heritage Conservation District Prioritization
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-77559.pdf

Speakers

Julie Beddoes, Gooderham & Worts Neighbourhood Association
Richard Longley, President, Architectural Conservancy Ontario
Francisco Alvarez, Executive Director, Heritage Toronto
Geoff Kettel, Co-President, Leaside Property Owners Association
Eileen Denny, Vice Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Association
Paul Farrelly, Church Wellesley Neighbourhood Association
Councillor Joe Cressy
Councillor Mike Layton
Councillor Sarah Doucette
Councillor Josh Matlow
Councillor Shelley Carroll

Communications (Committee)

(February 21, 2015) E-mail from Brian Graff (PG.New.PG2.8.1)
(February 23, 2015) Letter from David Harrison, Chair, Annex Residents Association (PG.New.PG2.8.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51369.pdf
(February 20, 2015) Letter from Robert Levy, President, Casa Loma Residents Association (PG.New.PG2.8.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51571.pdf
(February 23, 2015) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Carol Burtin Fripp, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated (PG.New.PG2.8.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51540.pdf
(February 24, 2015) Letter from Catherine Nasmith, President, Architectural Conservatory Ontario (PG.New.PG2.8.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51562.pdf
(February 24, 2015) Letter from Richard Longley, President, Architectural Conservancy Ontario (PG.New.PG2.8.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51565.pdf
(February 24, 2015) Letter from Francisco Alvarez, Executive Director, Historic St. Lawrence Hall (PG.New.PG2.8.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51567.pdf

8a - Toronto Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study Prioritization

Origin
(February 23, 2015) Letter from the Toronto Preservation Board
Summary

The Toronto Preservation Board on February 20, 2015, considered the following Report (February 3, 2015) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, regarding Toronto Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study Prioritization.

 

The following persons addressed the Toronto Preservation Board:

 

Rory Sinclair

Dominique Russell, Friends of Kensington Market

Michael Stewart, Goodmans LLP

Geoff Kettel, Co-President, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated

Paul Farrelly, Church-Wellesley Neighbourhood Association

Background Information (Committee)
(February 23, 2015) Report from the Toronto Preservation Board on Toronto Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study Prioritization
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-77116.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(February 18, 2015) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Co-President, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated (PG.Supp.PG2.8a.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51479.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Letter from Richard Longley, President, Architectural Conservancy Ontario (PG.Supp.PG2.8a.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51480.pdf
(February 18, 2015) Letter from Sandra Shaul, Chair, Heritage Committee, Annex Residents Association (PG.Supp.PG2.8a.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51521.pdf
(February 20, 2015) Letter from Councillor Joe Cressy (PG.Supp.PG2.8a.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51522.pdf
(February 20, 2015) Letter from Catherine Nasmith, President, Architectural Conservancy Ontario (PG.Supp.PG2.8a.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51523.pdf
(February 20, 2015) Letter from Robert Levy, President, Casa Loma Residents Association (PG.Supp.PG2.8a.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/comm/communicationfile-51524.pdf

PG2.11 - Request for Review of Dufferin Triangle Lands

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to review the lands bounded by Dufferin Street on the east, Florence Street on the north and the Lower Galt Subdivision rail corridor on the south and west (The Dufferin Triangle) in order to identify locations for public parks and public roads. City Planning staff are also requested to report back to Planning and Growth Management Committee on the review and provide recommendations regarding the following matters:

 

            a.  A public road network and pedestrian links;

            b.  Protection of lands for employment uses;

            c.  Location, massing and orientation of buildings;

            d.  The appropriate location for public parks;

            e.  Appropriate buffering and transition to lower scale residential uses in the area; and

            f.  Appropriate buffering and rail mitigation measures in accordance with the FCM

            guidelines.

Origin

(February 19, 2015) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão

Summary

Located on the west side of Dufferin Street and bounded by the rail corridor on the west and Florence Street on the north, the "Dufferin Triangle" has a long history of being the home for a variety of economic activities. Although, the nature of employment in the area has changed over the years, City Council has reaffirmed the important contribution the Triangle continues to make to the City's economy by preserving the lands for employment uses during the recently completed Municipal Comprehensive Review.

 

However, with the elimination of the Dufferin Jog, increasing intensification and development along Queen Street West and the submission of the development proposal at 440 Dufferin Street, there is growing interest in the Triangle lands for potential reinvestment.

 

Recognizing the importance of the lands to the local community, the City and to ensure the public's interest is protected over the long term in advance of any future redevelopment proposals, I hope committee members will support the above recommendations.

 

Should you require additional information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 19, 2015) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailão, Ward 18, Davenport on a Request for Review of Dufferin Triangle Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-76710.pdf

Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 2

PW2.2 - Evaluation and Changes to Pedestrian Priority Phase Signal (Scramble Crossing) at Bay Street and Bloor Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communication PW2.2.17 has been submitted on this Item

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services, to remove the Pedestrian Priority Phase signal (Scramble Crossing) at Bay and Bloor and replace it with a signal timing pattern as deemed suitable by the General Manager of Transportation Services, as soon as practicable.

 

2. City Council direct the General Manager of Transportation Services to consult with the Chief Planner, the ward councillor and community stakeholders, including the Bloor Yorkville BIA, to identify operational and design options to enhance safety and the pedestrian experience at the Bay and Bloor Street intersection, and report back on options to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the first quarter of 2016.

Origin

(February 12, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

A pedestrian priority phase or scramble crossing signal was implemented at the intersection of Bay and Bloor in 2010. The purpose of this report is to respond to a motion by City Council to evaluate this signal feature and investigate potential improvements.

 

Based on the results of the evaluation study, Transportation Services has found modest positive benefits for pedestrians while negative impacts to vehicular traffic have been significant at this location. After consulting with local stakeholders and investigating potential modifications to signal operations at this location, staff have concluded that a pedestrian priority phase signal is not a suitable tool for this intersection and should be removed as soon as practicable.

 

Background Information (Committee)

(February 12, 2015) Report and Attachment 1 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Evaluation and Changes to Pedestrian Priority Phase Signal (Scramble Crossing) at Bay Street and Bloor Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-76129.pdf

Speakers

Miroslav Glavic
Mark Earley
Michael Black, Walk Toronto
Frederick Emrich

Communications (Committee)

(February 14, 2015) E-mail from Jennifer Cheadle (PW.New.2.2.1)
(February 15, 2015) E-mail from Alan Baker (PW.New.2.2.2)
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Alexander Arvelo McQuaig (PW.New.2.2.3)
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Sara R. Wunch (PW.New.2.2.4)
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Myrna Copeland (PW.New.2.2.5)
(February 18, 2015) E-mail from Gregory F. Hill (PW.New.2.2.6)
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Dr. David Homer, Traffic Committee Chair, Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area (PW.New.2.2.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/comm/communicationfile-51318.pdf
(February 19, 2015) E-mail from Gee Chung, President, The Greater Yorkville Residents' Association (PW.New.2.2.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/comm/communicationfile-51321.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Letter from Dylan Reid and Michael Black, Steering Committee, Walk Toronto (PW.New.2.2.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/comm/communicationfile-51299.pdf
(February 20, 2015) E-mail from Elizabeth Holmes (PW.New.2.2.10)
(February 20, 2015) E-mail from Frederick Emrich (PW.New.2.2.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/comm/communicationfile-51347.pdf
(February 20, 2015) E-mail from Paul Maranger (PW.New.2.2.12)
(February 20, 2015) Letter from Mark Earley (PW.New.2.2.13)
(February 23, 2015) E-mail from Frederick Emrich (PW.New.2.2.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/comm/communicationfile-51360.pdf
(February 20, 2015) E-mail from Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam (PW.New.2.2.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/comm/communicationfile-51362.pdf
(February 23, 2015) Submission from the Chair, Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Article from Metro News, Bay-Bloor Scramble decision a glimmer of hope for a rational, factual Toronto (PW.New.2.2.16)

Communications (City Council)

(March 26, 2015) Letter from Dr. David Homer, Traffic Committee Chair, Bloor-Yorkville Business Improvement Area (CC.Supp.PW2.2.17)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52113.pdf
(March 31, 2015) Petition from 200 persons, submitted by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, Ward 27, Toronto Centre -Rosedale, during the Routine Matters portion of the meeting (CC.New)

PW2.3 - Toronto 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games - Temporary Traffic By-law Amendments

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Attention
The General Manager, Transportation Services has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (PW2.3a with recommendations)

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council enact the temporary traffic and parking by-law amendments required to support the Pan American/Parapan American Games as set out in Appendix 2 attached to the report dated February 11, 2015 from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

2. City Council approve the temporary road closures required to support the Pan American/Parapan American Games as set out in Appendix 3 attached to the report dated February 11, 2015 from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

3. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to report directly to City Council on July 7 and 8, 2015, if deemed necessary by the General Manager, Transportation Services, on any additional required temporary traffic regulations or road closure amendments and/or on changes to any temporary traffic regulations or road closure amendments approved by City Council in connection with the report dated February 11, 2015 from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

4. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to submit directly to Council at the appropriate time any necessary bills to amend the appropriate City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapters, and any Schedules thereto, to reinstate the traffic and parking regulations to what they were immediately prior to the by-law amendments made in connection with the report dated February 11, 2015 from the General Manager, Transportation Services.

 

5. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision, including the introduction in Council of any and all bills that may be required.

 

Committee Decision Advice and Other Information

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to report directly to City Council on reserved lanes for High Occupancy Vehicles and any other designated classes of vehicles during the Pan American and Parapan American Games and on any associated required amendments to implement the reserved lanes.

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The City of Toronto will serve as Host City for the 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games in July and August 2015. This report recommends a series of temporary traffic by-law amendments that are designed to provide efficient and reliable transportation service for Pan Am and Parapan Am "Games Clients" (athletes, officials, international federations, accredited media, etc.) and for spectators attending the events, while minimizing impacts and disruption, to the greatest extent possible, to Toronto residents, commuters and businesses.  Some of these temporary traffic by-laws would typically be delegated to the appropriate Community Councils.  Given, however, that the venues are located across the City, the importance of dealing with these issues consistently and urgently, the fact that some of these by-laws affect facilities crossing Community Council boundaries, and the value in having City Council consider all these matters in a coordinated manner, the City Manager has deemed this matter to be of City-wide significance, in accordance with the provisions of Section 27-152 of City of Toronto Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. 

 

Transportation planning for the 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games has been led by the Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Transportation Team (PATT), a group of provincial ministries, municipalities and transit agencies co-chaired by the Toronto 2015 Organizing Committee ("TO2015") and the Ministry of Transportation, Ontario.  City of Toronto Transportation Services and the City Manager's Office have been key members of the PATT.  The first phase of the PATT's work resulted in the March 2014 release of a Strategic Framework for Transportation which describes the strategies that will be used to deliver a successful transportation plan for the Games.   The temporary by-law amendments recommended in this report are required to implement transportation management measures that are necessary to support these strategies.

 

These amendments, contained in the Appendices to this report, include temporary parking regulations, turn prohibitions and temporary road closures in the vicinity of the competition and non-competition venues.  It is also proposed to include reserved lanes for designated classes of vehicles, including High Occupancy Vehicles (HOV's), on the Don Valley Parkway and on sections of the Gardiner Expressway and Lake Shore Boulevard which serve as key corridors to and from these sites.  The details with respect to the regulations and implementation of these lanes are under discussion with the Province and will be the subject of a separate staff report.

 

This report also recommends that City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to report directly to City Council on July 7 and 8, 2015, if the General Manager of Transportation Services deems it necessary, on any additional temporary traffic regulation, reserved lanes or road closure amendments and/or on any changes to any temporary traffic regulation, reserved lane, road closure or other matters approved by City Council on this item.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 11, 2015) Report and Appendices 1 - 3, from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Toronto 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games - Temporary Traffic By-law Amendments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-76332.pdf
(February 23, 2015) Presentation from the Director, Transportation Infrastructure Management on Pan Am/Parapan Am Games Temporary Traffic By-laws
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-76797.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(March 25, 2015) Supplementary report from the General Manager, Transportation Services on the Toronto 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games - Temporary Traffic By-law Amendments for High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes (PW2.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78679.pdf

Speakers

Hamish Wilson

Communications (Committee)

(February 23, 2015) Submission from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.2.3.1)

PW2.4 - Lower Yonge Precinct - Transportation Master Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council endorse the recommendations included in the Lower Yonge Precinct Study Transportation Master Plan Environmental Assessment.

 

2. City Council authorize the General Manager, Transportation Services to issue a Notice of Completion and file the Transportation Master Plan Report for the Lower Yonge Precinct Study in the public record for a minimum 30 days.

 

3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to prepare an Official Plan Amendment that would protect the lands needed for the easterly extension of Harbour Street to Lower Jarvis Street and the northerly extension of Cooper Street to The Esplanade.

 

4. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, as part of the subsequent phases of the Environmental Assessment process, to include in the preliminary design of the new road infrastructure, measures and facilities to accomodate cyclists in a safe and convenient manner.

Origin

(February 6, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The Lower Yonge Precinct Transportation Master Plan (TMP) was undertaken to define the transportation network that would support redevelopment in this area and balance local and regional travel demands. Several alternative transportation networks were developed and evaluated, with input from City Divisions, the public, landowners, affected government agencies and Aboriginal communities.

 

The recommended plan includes an easterly extension of Harbour Street (from Yonge Street to Lower Jarvis Street), realignment of the Yonge Street/Harbour Street intersection, a shortening of the Lower Jarvis Street off-ramp from eastbound Gardiner Expressway, removal of the Bay Street on-ramp, conversion of Harbour Street from one-way eastbound to two-way operations (from York Street to Yonge Street), and the extension of Cooper Street north to connect with Church Street and The Esplanade.

 

Further EA studies and approvals will be required for a number of the infrastructure components identified in the TMP. These further studies will define the specific roadway alignments, lane configurations, public realm composition, and other technical aspects.

 

A very preliminary estimate of the costs for this infrastructure is $99 to $186 million, not including design work, soil remediation, utility relocations or property acquisition. As a result, the total cost of implementation could be considerably higher.  These funds are not currently included in the 10-year capital plan and, therefore, a financial strategy needs to be developed as part of the Lower Yonge Precinct Planning process to identify the various City and non-City funding sources.  However, it is necessary to report on these infrastructure improvements at this time, prior to the development of the funding strategy, in order to receive Council endorsement of the streets and blocks plan which is necessary to guide development in the area and trigger the required Official Plan Amendment to protect the lands needed for the Harbour Street and Cooper Street extensions.  Further EA studies and approvals will be required for a number of the infrastructure components identified in the TMP. These further studies will define the specific roadway alignments, lane configurations, public realm composition, and other technical aspects.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 6, 2015) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on Lower Yonge Precinct - Transportation Master Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-76128.pdf

Speakers

Anthony Hilliard, Captain, Cycle Toronto, Ward 9
Alison Stewart, Co-Captain, Cycle Toronto, Ward 28

Communications (Committee)

(February 20, 2015) E-mail from Anthony Hilliard (PW.New.2.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/comm/communicationfile-51357.pdf

PW2.5 - William R. Allen Road Temporary Closure - Metrolinx Eglinton Crosstown LRT Tunnel Boring Machine Lift

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 21 - St. Paul's

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council approve the temporary closure of William R. Allen Road, in both directions, from Eglinton Avenue West to Lawrence Avenue West from 9:00 p.m. on Friday, April 17, 2015 to 5:00 a.m. on Monday, April 20, 2015 to facilitate the lift and transfer of the tunnel boring machines by Metrolinx's contractor.

 

2. In the event that the lift and transfer of the tunnel boring machines cannot occur on the dates and times referenced in Recommendation No. 1 because of poor weather conditions or other unforeseen circumstances, City Council approve the temporary closure of William R. Allen Road, in both directions, from Eglinton Avenue West to Lawrence Avenue West from 9:00 p.m. on Friday, May 8, 2015 to 5:00 a.m. on Monday, May 11, 2015 as an alternate date.

 

3. City Council approve the temporary closure of the southbound curb lane of William R. Allen Road from Lawrence Avenue West to Eglinton Avenue West from 9:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 16, 2015 to 9:00 p.m. on Friday, April 17, 2015 to facilitate the construction staging required for the lift and transfer of the tunnel boring machines.

 

4. In the event that the lift and transfer of the tunnel boring machines is rescheduled to the weekend of May 8 to May 11, 2015 in accordance with Recommendation 2, City Council approve the temporary closure of the southbound curb lane of William R. Allen Road from Lawrence Avenue West to Eglinton Avenue West from 9:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 7, 2015 to 9:00 p.m. on Friday, May 8, 2015 to facilitate the construction staging required for the lift and transfer of the tunnel boring machines.

Origin

(February 2, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek City Council’s authority to close the section of William R. Allen Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Lawrence Avenue West for one weekend in order to safely facilitate the lift and transfer of two tunnel boring machines being utilized by Metrolinx for its construction of the Eglinton Crosstown LRT project.  A closing of one of the southbound lanes is also recommended prior to the weekend closure in order to facilitate construction staging.

 

Additional closures are required on Eglinton Avenue West from Flanders Road (immediately to the east of William R. Allen Road) to Park Hill Road (immediately to the west of William R. Allen Road). This includes the off-ramp from southbound William R. Allen Road and the on-ramp to northbound William R. Allen Road.  These closures can be approved by the General Manager of Transportation Services.

 

Further to the proposed closure of William R. Allen Road between Eglinton Avenue West and Lawrence Avenue West, the section between Lawrence Avenue West and Sheppard Avenue West would also be closed at the same time for maintenance purposes.  This additional closure for City maintenance, which also falls under the delegated authority of the General Manager, is being combined with the closure proposed by Metrolinx to avoid the need for a second weekend closure of William R. Allen Road.

 

The proposed closing is scheduled on a weekend (April 17 to 20, 2015, with an alternate date of May 8 to May 11, 2015) in order to minimize the traffic disruption to area residents, businesses and commuters.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 2, 2015) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the General Manager, Transportation Services on William R. Allen Road Temporary Closure - Metrolinx Eglinton Crosstown LRT Tunnel Boring Machine Lift
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-76125.pdf

PW2.7 - Amendment to Agreements for Contracted Professional Engineering Services Supporting Transportation Services and Toronto Water Capital Projects - RFP 9117-10-5051

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the extension of the agreements with:

 

-  R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd. - Purchase Order No. 6031100;

-  GHD Inc., the legal successor to The Sernas Group Inc. - Purchase Order No. 6039155; and

-  MMM Group, the legal successor to McCormick Rankin Corporation – Open Contract No. 47018457

 

for contracted professional services related to design and construction supervision of 2014 Transportation Services and Toronto Water Capital Works Programs to December 31, 2015, under the same terms and conditions of the original agreements.

 

2. City Council authorize the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services to enter into and execute any required amending agreements to give effect to the extension in Recommendation 1.

Origin

(February 3, 2015) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request authority to amend agreements with R.V. Anderson Associates Ltd., GHD Inc., the legal successor to The Sernas Group Inc., and MMM Group, the legal successor to McCormick Rankin Corporation for contracted professional services related to design and construction supervision of the 2014 Transportation Services and Toronto Water Capital Works Programs. This administrative amendment request is to extend the term of the agreements, as well as the corresponding Purchase Orders and Open Contract from February 28, 2015 to December 31, 2015, under the same terms, conditions and contract value as the original agreements. This report recommends extending the duration of the three contracts only and does not alter the award values approved by Bid Committee.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 3, 2015) Report from the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division, on Amendment to Agreements for Contracted Professional Engineering Services Supporting Transportation Services and Toronto Water Capital Projects - RFP 9117-10-5051
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-75690.pdf

PW2.11 - A Road Safety Plan for Toronto

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication PW2.11.1 has been submitted on this item.

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with other City divisions, as appropriate, to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee in the fourth quarter of 2015 with a comprehensive plan to improve road safety, including, but not limited to:

 

a.  a review of international best practices from comparable jurisdictions, including Vision Zero;

 

b.  review of existing city policies, strategies and guidelines that touch on road safety;

 

c. an enhanced analysis of city-wide traffic collision data;

 

d.  specific recommendations to improve road safety, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists, over the short, medium and long terms;

 

e.  an implementation plan and funding strategy, as appropriate;

 

f.  a regular reporting mechanism to track progress;

 

g.  the creation of a Road Safety Advisory Group to engage key internal partners and external stakeholders, including but not limited to the Toronto Police Service, Toronto Public Health, the Disability Issues Committee, CARP, CAA, Cycle Toronto, WalkToronto, Toronto District School Board, Toronto Catholic District School Board, Sunnybrook Hospital and the Toronto Centre for Active Transportation; and

 

h.  the creation of a Road Safety Task Force to be developed and led by Transportation Services.

 

2.  City Council request the General Manager of Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee with:

 

a.  criteria to identify intersections which warrant enhanced pedestrian and cycling infrastructure;

 

b.  a list of intersections which meet these criteria; and

 

c.  a timeline to implement pedestrian and cycling safety improvements at the identified intersections.

Summary

In 2014, 51 Torontonians were killed and many more were seriously injured in traffic crashes. The trend is down but we can and must do better, particularly for pedestrians and cyclists, our most vulnerable road users.

 

Vision Zero is an international road safety initiative that aims to eliminate traffic-related injuries and fatalities. Founded in Sweden in 1997, Vision Zero has been implemented in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and major American cities, including Boston, Seattle and New York.

 

While Toronto has a number of policies that speak to different aspects of road safety, we lack an overarching umbrella framework that focuses squarely on the issue.

 

That's why I'm asking for a comprehensive plan to reduce traffic-related deaths and injuries on Toronto's roads.

 

We should learn from the expertise and real world experience of other leading jurisdictions, and the recommendation asks for a review of best practices, including Vision Zero.

 

The recommendation also asks for a review of existing collision data to inform our approach as well as a robust public consultation strategy, including the creation of a Road Safety Advisory Group to engage key stakeholders.

 

I have confirmed with staff that funding is available within Transportation Services' existing budget to undertake the development of a proposal for City Council's consideration in 2015.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 23, 2015) Letter from Councillor Jaye Robinson on A Road Safety Plan for Toronto
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-76793.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(March 30, 2015) Letter from Marilynn Bastedo, Chief Executive Officer, Canadian Motorcycle Association (CC.New.PW2.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52129.pdf

PW2.12 - Modernizing Toronto's Streetlights

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Public Works and Infrastructure Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the General Manager of Transportation Services to engage with Toronto Hydro to develop a plan to convert Toronto's streetlights to more energy efficient technologies and report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee by the second quarter of 2015. The report will include:

 

a.  business case and strategies to fund conversion of Toronto's existing streetlights including incentives and grants from other levels of government;

 

b.  survey of new street lighting technologies;

 

c.  potential energy savings from conversion;

 

d.  capital and operational costs of conversion; and

 

e.  potential roll out strategies and timing for conversion of Toronto's existing streetlights.

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Summary

It has been 22 years since the City of Toronto updated its streetlights, in that time technological advances have created lights that last longer, provide enhanced illumination, and are more energy efficient. Our streetlights currently use costly and inefficient metal halide and high-pressure sodium light bulbs to illuminate our streets and sidewalks. Conversion to light-emitting diode (L.E.D.) and other energy-efficient lighting technology has been proven to save money and reduce energy consumption in cities such as Los Angeles, Philadelphia, and Mississauga.

 

The Service Level Agreement between Toronto Hydro and the City of Toronto will be re-negotiated in 2016 which provides an opportunity to modernize our wasteful and costly streetlight infrastructure. Therefore, I am requesting that Transportation Services and Toronto Hydro study the issue and develop a plan to covert our streetlights to a more financially and environmentally sustainable technology in time for the 2016 budget cycle.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 11, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon on Modernizing Toronto's Streetlights
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-76410.pdf

Striking Committee - Meeting 3

ST3.1 - Council Member Appointments to Council Advisory Bodies and a Task Force

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint the following Members to the Aboriginal Affairs Committee for a term of office until December 31, 2016 and until successors are appointed:

 

Councillor Joe Cressy

Councillor Mike Layton, as Chair

 

2.  City Council appoint the following Members to the City-School Boards Advisory Committee for a term of office until December 31, 2016 and until successors are appointed:

 

Councillor Christin Carmichael Greb

Councillor Gary Crawford

Councillor Janet Davis

Councillor Sarah Doucette

Councillor Josh Matlow, as Chair

Councillor Frances Nunziata

 

3.  City Council appoint the following Members to the Film, Television and Commercial Production Industry Committee (Film Board) a term of office until December 31, 2016 and until successors are appointed:

 

Councillor Gary Crawford

Councillor Paula Fletcher, as Chair

Councillor Norman Kelly

 

4.  City Council appoint the following Members to the Liquor Licensing Issues Task Force for a term of office until December 31, 2016 and until successors are appointed:

 

Councillor Joe Cressy

Councillor Mike Layton

Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti

Councillor Frances Nunziata

Councillor Gord Perks

Councillor Cesar Palacio, Chair of the Licensing and Standards Committee, as Chair.

 

5.  City Council appoint the following Members to the Tenant Issues Committee for a term of office until December 31, 2016 and until successors are appointed:

 

Councillor Janet Davis

Councillor Mary Fragedakis

Councillor Josh Matlow, as Chair

Councillor Joe Mihevc

Councillor Gord Perks

Councillor Anthony Perruzza

 

6.  City Council appoint Councillor Norman Kelly to the Toronto French Language Advisory Committee as Chair, for a term of office until December 31, 2016 and until a successor is appointed.

 

7.  City Council appoint the following Members to the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council for a term of office until December 31, 2016 and until successors are appointed:

 

Councillor Shelley Carroll

Councillor John Filion

Councillor Michael Thompson, Chair of the Economic Development Committee, as Chair.

Origin

(March 2, 2015) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The purpose of this report is to appoint Council Members to Council Advisory Bodies and a Task Force.

Background Information (Committee)

(February 2, 2015) Report from the City Clerk on Council Member Appointments to Council Advisory Bodies and a Task Force
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77592.pdf
Attachment 1 - Members' preferences for appointment to the Aboriginal Affairs Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77593.pdf
2nd Revised Attachment 2 - Members' preferences for appointment to the City-School Boards Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77748.pdf
Revised Attachment 2 - Members' preferences for appointment to the City-School Boards Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77594.pdf
Revised Attachment 3 - Members' preferences for appointment to the Film, Television and Commercial Production Industry Committee (Film Board)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77595.pdf
Attachment 4 - Members' preferences for appointment to the Liquor Licensing Issues Task Force
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77596.pdf
Revised Attachment 5 - Members' preferences for appointment to the Tenant Issues Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77597.pdf
Attachment 6 - Members' preferences for appointment to the Toronto French Language Advisory Committee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77598.pdf
Revised Attachment 7 - Members' preferences for appointment to Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-77599.pdf

Striking Committee - Meeting 4

ST4.1 - Appointment to fill a Council Member Vacancy on the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Striking Committee recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint Councillor Paula Fletcher to the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors for a term of office until December 31, 2016 and until a successor is appointed.

Origin

(March 16, 2015) Report from the City Clerk

Summary

The purpose of this report is to fill a Council Member vacancy on the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors resulting from Councillor John Filion's resignation from the Board.

Background Information (Committee)

(March 16, 2015) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment to fill a Council Member Vacancy on the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-78022.pdf
Revised Attachment 1 - Members' preferences for appointment to the Heritage Toronto Board of Directors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-78023.pdf
Attachment 2 - Resignation letter from Councillor John Filion
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/st/bgrd/backgroundfile-78024.pdf

Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 4

EY4.1 - Final Report - 30 Weston Road and Part of 33 Gunns Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that, consistent with City Council's August 25, 2014 direction:

 

1.         City Council amend Site-Specific Zoning By-law 1203-2009, as amended by By-law 1678-2013, for the lands at 30 Weston Road and Part of 33 Gunns Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 1 to the report (January 26, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         City Council require the owner to enter into an Amending Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to reallocate the secured Section 37 funds before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

At its meeting of August 25, 2014, City Council directed the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, to "bring forward a Zoning By-law amendment to Etobicoke York Community Council to amend the Section 37 provisions of By-laws 1203-2009 and 1678-2013, pertaining to 30 Weston Road and Part of 33 Gunns Road, to allow up to $200,000 of the remaining $456,520.97 including accrued interest, secured and obtained for public art, to be used for capital improvements to parks and recreation facilities in Ward 11". The total amount of the Section 37 funds collected would not be altered.

 

As it is intended these reallocated funds will be used to improve a park 6 km from the subject property, it should be noted this direction is not consistent with City Council's approved Implementation Guidelines for Section 37 of the Planning Act as adopted at its meeting held on April 1, 2 and 3, 2014. The guidelines require the community benefit to have an appropriate geographic relationship to the contributing development. 

 

The subject property also has a Section 37 Agreement registered on title that must be amended to secure the Section 37 community benefit provision consistent with the proposed change to the Section 37 provisions in the Zoning By-law. 

 

As directed by City Council, this report proposes amendments to Site Specific Zoning By-law 1203-2009, as amended by By-law 1678-2013, to reallocate a portion of the funds secured under the Section 37 provisions of this By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 30 Weston Road and Part of 33 Gunns Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75064.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) E-mail from Angelo Fazari (EY.Main.EY4.1.1)

EY4.2 - Final Report - 3406-3434 Weston Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 3406-3434 Weston Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to the report (January 28, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

           

2.         City Council amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 3406-3434 Weston Road substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 10 to the report (January 28, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Official Plan Amendment and/or Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:

 

a.         The following community benefits are recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement:

 

i           A $400,000 cash contribution towards local community improvements, including the construction of a public square and flag pole in the Emery Village area, with $100,000 to be paid at the time of entering into the Section 37 Agreement, and the balance to be paid prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the development, and the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 10 to the report (January 28, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District be amended accordingly.

 

b.         The following shall be secured as a legal convenience:

 

i           The owner shall satisfy the requirements of the Toronto District School Board in regard to warning clauses and signage. 

 

ii          A $42,500 payment to the General Manager, Transportation Services for the proportional cost of the signalization of the adjacent intersection within 45 days of the Zoning By-law Amendment coming into to full force and effect.

 

c.         The above noted cash contributions are to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Building Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date the payment is made.

 

d.         In the event the cash contribution noted in Recommendation 4.a.i. has not been used for the intended purpose within three (3) years of the By-law coming into full force and effect, the cash contribution may be redirected for another purpose, at the discretion of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, provided that the purpose(s) is/are identified in the Toronto Official Plan and will benefit the community in the vicinity of the property.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 28, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes an 11 to 12 storey, mixed-use commercial residential building containing 270 residential units with 688 m2 of grade related retail space at 3406-3434 Weston Road.  The proposed development would contain 348 parking spaces and result in a floor space index of 3.46.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 28, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report - 3406-3434 Weston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75105.pdf

EY4.3 - Refusal Report - 6 Lloyd Avenue and 195, 181, 179, 177, 175, 171, 169, 167, 165, 163 and 161 Mulock Avenue - Official Plan Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 6 Lloyd Avenue and 195, 181, 179, 177, 175, 171, 169, 167, 165, 163 and 161 Mulock Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (January 26, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Etobicoke York Community Council:

 

1.         Requested the City Solicitor to make best efforts to ensure the bills are available for passage at the March 31, 2015 meeting of City Council.

 

Etobicoke York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 8, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan by redesignating the northern two-thirds of the lands from Employment Areas to Mixed Use Areas and creating a new Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP) over the entire site to permit residential uses and commercial/offices uses at 6 Lloyd Avenue and 195, 181, 179, 177, 175, 171, 169, 167, 165, 163 and 161 Mulock Avenue.  The southern one-third of the site is proposed to remain designated Employment Areas.  The site is commonly referred to as 6 Lloyd Avenue and is titled this way in the graphics and attachments to this report.

 

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 8, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding a Refusal Report - 6 Lloyd Avenue and 195, 181, 179, 177, 175, 171, 169, 167, 165, 163 and 161 Mulock Avenue - Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-74893.pdf

Speakers

Steve Karaszi
Richard E. Rotman
Rocco Pannese
Don Pano
Daniel Artenosi, Overland LLP
Peter Vecchiarelli
Michael Gingerich
Luigi Santaguida, Stanton Renaissance

Communications (Community Council)

(February 2, 2015) E-mail from Angelo and Vince Fazari (EY.Main.EY4.3.1)

3a - Supplementary Report - 6 Lloyd Avenue and 195, 181, 179, 177, 175, 171, 169, 167, 165, 163 and 161 Mulock Avenue - Official Plan Amendment

Origin
(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District
Summary

At is meeting of January 13, 2015 Etobicoke York Community Council deferred consideration of the report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District (Item EY3.4), to a statutory public meeting to be held on February 18, 2015 and directed the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to bring forward for consideration at the statutory public meeting the draft Official Plan Amendment submitted with the application.

 

A copy of the applicant's draft Official Plan Amendment is included as Attachment 1 to this report.

 

As outlined in the January 8, 2015 report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, staff recommended refusal of the application and draft Official Plan Amendment for the following reasons:

 

a.         The proposal conflicts with the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and is inconsistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.  No information was submitted to demonstrate that the land is not required for employment purposes over the long term or that there is a need to convert a portion of the site to non-employment uses.  As well, no information was provided to indicate how the proposed redesignation, to allow for residential uses, would not negatively impact the overall viability of the existing industries in the surrounding area. 

 

b.         The proposal does not conform to the City's Official Plan as it relates to Employment Areas.  The site is located in a stable employment area that continues to experience demand for employment space.  It is staff's opinion that the lands be retained for employment uses and there is no need for the requested conversion to meet the City's population forecasts as provided by the Growth Plan. 

 

c.         The proposal does not conform to Council adopted OPA No. 231 and SASP 447 which sets outs a new planning framework for the site and addresses land use compatibility issues.  Despite Council's adoption of OPA No. 231 that allows for the redesignation of a portion of the site to Mixed Use Areas and the introduction of residential uses subject to conditions, this application seeks broader land use policies through the elimination of all site-specific restrictions as they relate to residential uses.  Specifically, it eliminates the restrictions on maximum residential building heights and minimum residential building setbacks from the adjacent rail corridor included in SASP 447 to minimize adverse impacts from nearby industrial uses and the rail corridor. 

 

d.         The proposal does not include a strategy to address land uses capability issues that are known to exist in the area due to the proximity of the adjacent rail corridor and existing employment uses.  This could result in a potential future residential development that would require mitigation measures that may not contribute to an appropriate or safe living environment as demonstrated by the conceptual development submitted in support of the subject application.

 

e.         While the submitted development concept does not form part of the amendment to the Official Plan being requested, it does provide information regarding how the proposed land use changes may relate to a potential future development and be accommodated on the site.  As currently proposed, the conceptual development proposal does not conform to the Official Plan, is inconsistent with Council approved guidelines for Tall Buildings and fails to address compatibility issues with adjoining land uses and as a result would not provide for an appropriate living environment. 

Background Information (Community Council)
(January 26, 2015) Official Plan Amendment - Supplementary Report - 6 Lloyd Avenue and 195, 181, 179, 177, 175, 171, 169, 167, 165, 163 and 161 Mulock Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75065.pdf

EY4.4 - Request for Direction Report - 2968 Islington Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Approval Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council refuse the applications for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Approval at 2968 Islington Avenue.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain an outside planning consultant to support Council's position at the Ontario Municipal Board.

Origin

(February 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District

Summary

These Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Approval applications propose to permit the vacant lands at 2968 Islington Avenue to be developed as an addition to an existing commercial plaza located on the abutting lands to the north at 2972-2974 Islington Avenue.  The proposal is for a two-storey, 647 m2 addition to the plaza, the majority of the addition, being 538 m2, will be on the subject property.

 

The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application and the related Site Plan Control Approval application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) citing City Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the time prescribed by the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act.  A Pre Hearing Conference has been scheduled for April 21, 2015.  The purpose of this report is to seek City Council's direction with respect to the position of the City at the OMB hearing.

 

This report recommends a settlement to the appeals to permit the development as proposed by the applications.  It is staff's opinion that the settlement outlined in this report is appropriate.  Staff are recommending that the settlement be supported subject to the conditions in the Recommendations Section of this report. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(February 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 2968 Islington Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Approval Applications - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75099.pdf
(January 28, 2015) Placeholder Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District regarding 2968 Islington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-76210.pdf

Speakers

Loris Moretto (Submission Filed)
Gail Tapiero
Sunita Pathak

Communications (Community Council)

(February 16, 2015) E-mail from Ashok Kumar Pathak and Raj Kumar Pathak (EY.New.EY4.4.1)
(February 16, 2015) Submission from Loris Moretto (EY.New.EY4.4.2)

EY4.7 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 4200 Eglinton Avenue West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
4 - Etobicoke Centre
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (EY4.7a with recommendations)

Statutory - Ontario Heritage Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 4200 Eglinton Avenue West under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 4200 Eglinton Avenue West (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

2.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the designation of the property.

 

5.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 4200 Eglinton Avenue West.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 4200 Eglinton Avenue West under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement with property owner.  The city-owned property is located on the northwest corner of Eglinton Avenue West and Royal York Road and contains a detached house form building known historically as the Mary Reid House, which is listed on the City of Toronto's heritage register.

 

In 2014, Build Toronto advertised the sale of the property.  According to the policies in the City's Official Plan, when a City-owned heritage property is transferred to private ownership, the City will designate the property and will secure a Heritage Easement Agreement.

 

Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the property at 4200 Eglinton Avenue West (Mary Reid House) meets Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation under the Ontario Heritage Act. The designation of the property would enable City Council to manage alterations that will affect the property's heritage attributes, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning regarding the Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 4200 Eglinton Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75190.pdf
Attachment 1 - Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75191.pdf
Attachment 2 - Photographs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75192.pdf
Attachment 3 - Statement of Significance
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75193.pdf
Attachment 4 - Heritage Property Research and Evaluation Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75194.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(February 23, 2015) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority for a Heritage Easement Agreement - 4200 Eglinton Avenue West (EY4.7a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78347.pdf

EY4.14 - Application to Remove a City Owned Tree - 115 Prince George Drive

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant the request for a permit to remove one (1) City owned Norway spruce tree fronting 115 Prince George Drive, with a condition that the applicant pay for the appraised tree value and the costs for 3 replacement trees to be planted by the City; the applicant is also responsible for tree removal and all associated costs, as well as submission of an Agreement for Contractors to Perform Arboricultural Services on City Owned Street Trees prior to tree removal, to the satisfaction of the General Manager.

Origin

(January 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application to remove one (1) City owned tree in front of 115 Prince George Drive. The applicant is requesting permission to remove the tree for several reasons, including sap and cones falling onto vehicles, roots damaging an asphalt driveway, and competition with neighbouring trees and vegetation, impeding the growth of grass.

 

The tree in question is private Norway spruce (Picea abies) measuring 55 cm in diameter. This tree is healthy and maintainable. Urban Forestry does not support the removal of this tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation regarding an Application to Remove a City Owned Tree at 115 Prince George Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-74930.pdf

Speakers

Norman Robinson

Communications (Community Council)

(February 17, 2015) Letter from Norman Robinson (EY.New.EY4.14.1)

EY4.15 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 6 Rathgar Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
3 - Etobicoke Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant the request for a permit to remove the one (1) private white pine tree located in the front yard of 6 Rathgar Avenue, with a condition that the owner provide five (5) trees as replacement, which can be achieved in a combination of on-site planting and cash-in-lieu of planting.

Origin

(January 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) private tree located in the front yard of 6 Rathgar Avenue.  The application indicates that the owners are concerned that the tree is a potential and imminent hazard.  A permit to remove the tree was denied.  A subsequent letter of appeal includes several additional concerns which are addressed in the staff report.

 

The subject tree is a white pine (Pinus strobus) measuring 62 cm in diameter.  The tree is currently in good condition, structurally and botanically, therefore removal is not justified.  Urban Forestry does not support removal of this tree.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation regarding an Application to Remove a Private Tree at 6 Rathgar Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-74929.pdf

EY4.25 - Highway Alterations - The West Mall and Evans Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the alterations and modifications at the southeast corner of the intersection of The West Mall and Evans Avenue, as indicated in Appendix "A", and generally as shown on the Drawing P-1575-026, dated January 8, 2015.

 

2.         City Council approve the alterations and modifications on the south side of Evans Avenue between The West Mall and the private driveway access opposite Sherway Gate, as indicated in Appendix "A", and generally as shown on the attached Drawing P 1575-026, dated January 8, 2015.

Origin

(January 21, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting City Council authority to alter the southeast corner of the intersection of The West Mall and Evans Avenue by removing the northbound to eastbound right-turn channel, thus including the northbound (to eastbound) right-turn movements into the existing traffic control signals. In addition, a sidewalk is to be constructed on the south side of Evans Avenue between The West Mall and the private driveway access opposite Sherway Gate.

 

This proposed road alterations will provide for a more pedestrian friendly environment and help reduce the speed of vehicular traffic travelling north from the QEW off-ramp and turning right (east) onto Evans Avenue and eliminate the need for pedestrians to cross this ramp.

 

Since the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Evans Avenue and The West Mall, City Council approval of this report is required. TTC staff has been consulted on the matter and has not objected to the proposal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 21, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding Highway Alterations - The West Mall and Evans Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75032.pdf
Attachments 1 and 2 - Existing and Proposed Configurations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75033.pdf

EY4.27 - Right-Turn Prohibition - Royal York Road at Leland Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
Bill 347 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the enactment of a “No Right Turn, 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday” restriction for southbound traffic on Royal York Road at Leland Avenue.

Origin

(January 20, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval to prohibit southbound right-turning vehicles on Royal York Road at Leland Avenue between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday.

 

As Royal York Road is a transit route, this matter requires the approval of City Council. Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) staff has been advised of the issue and have not objected to the recommendations.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 20, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services - Etobicoke York District regarding a Right-Turn Prohibition - Royal York Road at Leland Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75106.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75107.pdf

EY4.43 - Non-Objection to Issuance of a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Sales Licence - Black Oak Brewery

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario of its support of the application from Black Oak Brewery, 75 Horner Avenue, to change its licence from a Manufacturer's Liquor License to a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Licence, and the City Clerk be directed to advise the AGCO accordingly.

Origin

(January 26, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore

Summary

Requesting support of an application from Black Oak Brewery, located at 75 Horner Avenue, to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario for a Manufacturers Limited Liquor Licence.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 26, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mark Grimes, Ward 6, Etobicoke-Lakeshore regarding an application for a Manufacturer's Limited Liquor Licence from Black Oak Brewery, 75 Horner Avenue.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-74920.pdf

EY4.47 - Recommended Candidates to the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke North, 3 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 17 - Davenport

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals.

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council appoint the candidates listed in the Confidential Attachment No. 1 to the report (January 20, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, to the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel, effective January 2015, for a term that extends to the end of the 2014-2018 Council session, or until their successors are appointed.

 

2          City Council remove the panel members listed in Confidential Attachment No. 2 to the report (January 20, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, from the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel.

 

3.         City Council authorize the release of Confidential Attachment No. 1 and Confidential Attachment No. 2 once it has dealt with the recommendations within the report (January 20, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning. 

Origin

(January 20, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that the Etobicoke York Community Council nominate the individuals listed in confidential Attachment No. 1 to the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel (EYCPP) for appointment by City Council and remove existing panel members listed in confidential Attachment No. 2.

 

Community preservation panels are established for each area represented by a community council.  These panels act as heritage advocates in their communities.  The community preservation panels report to the Toronto Preservation Board on local heritage matters and on issues relating to the Ontario Heritage Act.  Each panel chair occupies a seat on the Toronto Preservation Board.

 

Thirty applications to serve on the community preservation panels were received.  

Eight applicants volunteered to serve on the EYCPP.  All were reviewed and a list of qualified candidates was assembled.  In addition, each panel chair was asked to forward names of existing panel members who are no longer active.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 20, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division regarding Recommended Candidates to the Etobicoke York Community Preservation Panel
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-75321.pdf

North York Community Council - Meeting 4

NY4.3 - Stopping Prohibitions - Toro Road between Keele Street and Alexdon Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West
Attention
Bill 345 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council prohibit stopping from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday on both sides of Toro Road between Keele Street and Alexdon Road.

Origin

(January 30, 2015) Report from from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting approval to prohibit stopping during peak periods on both sides of Toro Road between Keele Street and Alexdon Road.

 

The installation of stopping prohibitions will address concerns with respect to parked vehicles obstructing two-way traffic flow along Toro Road.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, on Stopping Prohibitions on Toro Road between Keele Street and Alexdon Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75617.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Toro Road between Keele Street and Alexdon Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75618.pdf

NY4.9 - Traffic Control Signal - Eglinton Avenue East and Jonesville Crescent

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
34 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the installation of the Traffic Control Signals on Eglinton Avenue East at a location 55 metres west of Jonesville Crescent.

Origin

(July 9, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District

Summary

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Eglinton Avenue East, City Council approval of this report is required.

 

To obtain approval to install a traffic control signal on Eglinton Avenue East at a location 55 metres west of Jonesville Crescent.

 

The installation of a traffic control signal on Eglinton Avenue East at a location 55 metres west of Jonesville Crescent would allow trail users to safely cross Eglinton Avenue East and continue along the Pan Am Path.

Background Information (Community Council)

(July 9, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services Division, North York District on Traffic Control Signal on Eglinton Avenue East and Jonesville Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75155.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map - Traffic Control Signal - Eglinton Avenue East and Jonesville Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75156.pdf

NY4.10 - Pilot Project to Allow Conditional Residential Driveway Apron Parking in Ward 8

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West
Attention
Communication NY4.10.8 has been submitted on this Item.

Bill 369 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve an exemption to allow for the parking of vehicles on driveways within the portion of the boulevard that is situated between the travelled portion of the roadway and the sidewalk, on Shoreham Drive only, by amending Section 918-2 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards, by adding a new Subsection C.1 as follows:

 

“C.1     Despite Subsections 918-2B and 918-2C, in Ward 8, where authorized under this chapter, a motor vehicle may be parked anywhere within the confines of that portion of the boulevard within a private driveway, on Shoreham Drive only, between the travelled portion of the roadway and the sidewalk, provided that the General Manager is satisfied that the parking conforms to the following criteria:

 

a.         The parking does not obstruct or impede pedestrian or vehicle traffic;

 

b.         When parked, there is a minimum setback of 0.3 metres from the travelled portion of the roadway and the motor vehicle as well as a minimum setback of 0.3 metres from the motor vehicle and the front edge of the sidewalk;

 

c.         The parking shall be perpendicular to the face of the curb or the edge of the travelled portion of the roadway;

 

d.         The parking does not interfere with the safe operation of the street and sidewalk; and

 

e.         When parked, there is a minimum clearance of 2.0 metres from the motor vehicle and any and all fire hydrants."

 

2.         City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, to monitor the operations of the street and report back to the North York Community Council, if necessary.

 

Origin

(January 13, 2015) Memo from Councillor Perruzza

Summary

Many residential neighbourhoods in Toronto’s Ward 8 were built with deep driveway aprons able to accommodate a parked vehicle without overhanging the sidewalk or street.  Parking in this area for many residents has been a common, long-time and often necessary practice to serve the needs of their household.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 13, 2015) Memo from Councillor Perruzza on Pilot Project to Allow Conditional Residential Driveway Apron Parking in Ward 8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-74953.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(February 7, 2015) E-mail from Pat Di Biase (NY.New.NY4.10.1)
(February 7, 2015) E-mail from Pat Di Biase (NY.New.NY4.10.2)
(February 8, 2015) E-mail from Pat Di Biase (NY.New.NY4.10.3)
(February 11, 2015) E-mail from Pat Di Biase (NY.New.NY4.10.4)
(February 11, 2015) E-mail from Pat Di Biase (NY.New.NY4.10.5)
(February 18, 2015) Petition from Councillor Perruzza with 89 signatures from residents requesting the City of Toronto to allow for parking on the City portion of driveways on Shoreham Drive (NY.New.NY4.10.6)
(February 17, 2015) Letter from Konstantinos Gus Thomas and Katerina Thomas (NY.New.NY4.10.7)

Communications (City Council)

(March 2, 2015) Submission from Pat Di Biase (CC.Main.NY4.10.8)

10a - Residential Driveway Apron Parking - Shoreham Drive

Origin
(January 30, 2015) Report from from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District
Summary

This report is in response to the deferred motion from North York Community Council dated January 13, 2015 related to NY3.52 Pilot Project to Allow Conditional Residential Driveway Apron Parking in Ward 8.

 

North York Community Council deferred consideration of the memo dated January 13, 2015 from Councillor Peruzza requesting that the Director of North York Transportation Services define the area involved, and referred to, in the attached original motion. Revised amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards are provided which refer specifically to Shoreham Drive, only.

Background Information (Community Council)
(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, on Residential Driveway Apron Parking - Shoreham Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75644.pdf
Attachment 1 - Memorandum January 13 - Councillor Anthony Perruzza
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75645.pdf
(January 30, 2015) Attachment 2 - Aerial Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75646.pdf

NY4.11 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
23 - Willowdale, 33 - Don Valley East

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following request noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way:

 

a.         Liquor Licence extension for the 18th Annual Armenian Community Centre (ACC) Summerfest 2015, an outdoor function, to be held on Friday, July 10, 2015, from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; Saturday, July 11, 2015, from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and Sunday, July 12, 2015, from 5:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., at 50 Hallcrown Place.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council, for liquor licensing purposes, declared the following to be an event of municipal significance:

 

1.         The Hispanic Fiesta to be held on September 4, 5, 6 and 7, 2015 in Mel Lastman Square from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events for Municipal Significance for liquor licensing purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(October 14, 2014) Fax from Hamaz Tashjian, Manager, Armenian Community Centre, requesting an extension to their existing Liquor Licence for the 19th ACC (Armenian Community Centre) Summerfest, to be held at 50 Hallcrown Place, on Friday, July 10, 2015 from 5:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; Saturday, July 11, 2015 from 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.; and Sunday, July 12, 2015 from 5:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. (NY.Main.NY4.11.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/comm/communicationfile-50806.pdf
(January 14, 2015) Memo from Councillor Palacio, requesting that, for liquor licensing purposes, North York Community Council declare the Hispanic Fiesta to be held on September 4, 5, 6, and 7, 2015 in Mel Lastman Square from 3:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily, to be an event of municipal significance and/or community significance and advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection to it taking place. (NY.Main.NY4.11.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/comm/communicationfile-50805.pdf

NY4.14 - Montgomery Square 2388 Yonge Street Public Art Plan

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
16 - Eglinton-Lawrence

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the Montgomery Square 2388 Yonge Street Public Art Plan as attached to the report (January 19, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design.

Origin

(January 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

The purpose of this staff report is to seek City Council's approval of the Montgomery Square 2388 Yonge Street Public Art Plan. The plan, which is included as Attachment 1 of this report, outlines the method by which the owner will commission public art on a new public park block dedicated to the City as a condition of development approval.

 

This public art plan provides a framework and description of the commissioning of public art including the project overview; curatorial vision; the overview of the development; description of the proposed public art site; public art opportunities including key objectives; artist selection team; the design team; background on the public art consultant; artist selection process; public art relations program; community programming opportunity; estimated public art budget; and schedule.

 

The attached plan meets the objectives of City Planning’s Percent for Public Art Program Guidelines and is supported by the Toronto Public Art Commission.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division on Montgomery Square 2388 Yonge Street Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75305.pdf
Attachment 1 - Montgomery Square 2388 Yonge Street Public Art Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75306.pdf

NY4.21 - Final Report - Zoning Application to Lift Holding Provisions (H) - 3711 and 3715 Keele Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 3711 and 3715 Keele Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendments attached as Attachment No. 5  to the report (January 29, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District. 

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Notice of the Intention to amend Zoning By-law 7625 to remove a holding symbol (H) was given in accordance with the Planning Act. No one addressed the North York Community Council on February 18, 2015.

Origin

(January 29, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

This application proposes to lift the Holding Provision 'H' symbol tied to the subject property in order to permit the entire building gross floor area of 7836 m2 to be used for commercial purposes.  The Holding Provision requires that prior to the lifting of the "H" a Traffic Impact Study be submitted, reviewed and found acceptable to City staff.  This condition has been satisfied.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 29, 2015) Final Report and Attachments 1-5 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning Application to Lift Holding Provisions (H) for 3711 and 3715 Keele Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75343.pdf

NY4.22 - Request for Direction Report - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications - 102-134 Hucknall Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
8 - York West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing to oppose the Zoning By-law amendment and Site Plan Control applications for 102-134 Hucknall Road in their current form, and to hire external professional consultants as required to implement the foregoing.

 

2.         Should the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) approve the applications, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request that the OMB withholds its Order(s) approving the applications until such time as:

 

a.         The Board has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed zoning by-law amendment is in a form satisfactory to the City; and

 

b.         All pre-approval conditions have been met for the Site Plan Control application.

Origin

(January 29, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The applicant has appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control applications to the Ontario Municipal Board due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  A hearing has been scheduled for March 18, 2015.

 

This application at 108-134 Hucknall Road proposes to amend the former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 to permit a four storey building with 994m2 of commercial space at grade and 3000m2 of residential space located in the 3 floors above.  A total of 42 residential units are proposed and 6 commercial units.  The height of the proposed building would be 14.8 metres.  Underground parking is proposed to be accessed off Mantello Drive and would contain 58 vehicle parking spaces and 42 bicycle parking spaces.

 

The purpose of this report is to seek Council’s direction for staff representation at the Ontario Municipal Board.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 29, 2015) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-4 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications for 102-134 Hucknall Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75350.pdf

NY4.23 - Request for Direction Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment Applications - 172, 176, and 180 Finch Avenue West, 1-11 and 23 Grantbrook Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and other appropriate staff, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to oppose the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications in their current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve the outstanding matters, subject to the following:

 

a.         that, should there be any proposed settlement offer, prior to the acceptance of any settlement offer by City Council, a community consultation meeting be scheduled in consultation with the local Councillor;

 

b.         that any proposed settlement not prejudice the Central Finch Area Secondary Plan in any material way.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its Order(s) should it approve the applications until such time as:

 

a.         the Board has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments are in a form satisfactory to the City; and

 

b.         the City and the owner have entered into a Section 37 agreement that secures community benefits.

 

3.         City Council direct that the City require an onsite parkland contribution, satisfactory to the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation.

Origin

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

The applicant has appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act. A Preliminary Hearing has been scheduled for March 16, 2015.

 

The Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications propose the redevelopment of the site to permit a 6-storey mid-rise building fronting on Finch Avenue West, with approximately 1,016 m² of commercial space on the ground floor and 150 apartment units above, and 32 stacked townhouses at the northerly boundary of the site. The proposal would consist of a total of 183 residential units, resulting in a total FSI of 1.72. 251 parking spaces are proposed at-grade and below grade. The application proposes to relocate the existing designated heritage house.

 

This report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff, attend the OMB hearing in opposition to the proposal in its current form and to continue to work with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the outstanding issues.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 30, 2015) Request for Direction Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-Law Amendment Applications for 172, 176, and 180 Finch Avenue West, 1-11 and 23 Grantbrook Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75186.pdf

Speakers

Sheena Farrow
Wendy Janvrin
Patricia Burns

Communications (Community Council)

(February 12, 2015) E-mail from Anne McConnell (NY.New.NY4.23.1)
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Mary Ann Cross, North York Community Preservation Panel (NY.New.NY4.23.2)

Declared Interests (Community Council)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Christin Carmichael Greb - as she knows one of the owners of the subject property

NY4.24 - Final Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - 4841 to 4881 Yonge Street, 2 and 50 Sheppard Avenue East, 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
The Director, Community Planning, North York District has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (distributed as MM5.22a with recommendations)

City Council has adopted a procedural motion to remove this matter from the jurisdiction of the North York Community Council and has brought it forward for consideration by Council.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council:

 

1.         Deferred consideration of the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, for not later than two meetings (May 12, 2015), to allow the applicant an opportunity to include social facilities within the proposed development and to address the concerns presented by area residents and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, with the understanding that the matter could be brought forward to the next meeting of the North York Community Council on April 14, 2015, if there is a proposal agreed upon by City Planning staff, the applicant and the Ward Councillor.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

These applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law propose a 39 storey residential apartment on the Greenfield Avenue frontage of the Sheppard Centre, additional retail commercial uses on the Yonge Street, Sheppard Avenue East and Greenfield Avenue frontages, and the demolition and replacement of 25 existing residential rental units through renovation and an addition to existing vacant space in the Sheppard Centre.

 

A Rental Housing Demolition application has been submitted with the related planning applications to demolish the 25 existing residential rental units at 2 Forest Laneway. The 25 rental units are to be replaced in the new development, with affected tenants receiving relocation assistance and being able to return to the new replacement units.

 

The proposed additional and retrofitted retail and commercial uses on the Yonge Street, Sheppard Avenue East and Greenfield Avenue frontages will enhance and improve the pedestrian streetscape. The relocation of the 25 existing rental townhouses from the Greenfield Avenue to the Sheppard Avenue East frontage will improve the quality of the rental housing stock, and enable the current loading facility activities on Greenfield Avenue to be provided within the new building. The height and massing of the proposed additional residential apartment building fits into the proposed location on Greenfield Avenue, and has no appreciable impact on stable residential areas outside the Secondary Plan.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. This report also recommends that Council approve the rental housing demolition application under Municipal Code 667 subject to the conditions outlined in this report and that the authority for Site Plan approval be delegated back to staff.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) Final Report and Attachments 1-11 from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan and Rental Housing Demolition Applications for 4841 to 4881 Yonge Street, 2 and 50 Sheppard Avenue East, 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-75642.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(March 27, 2015) Supplementary report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, on 4841 to 4881 Yonge Street and 2 and 50 Sheppard Avenue East, 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan and Rental Housing Demolition Applications (distributed as MM5.22a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78865.pdf

Speakers

Anne Benedetti, Goodmans, LLP, representing the applicant (Submission Filed)
Anne Bellissimo, Principal, Cardinal Carter Academy of the Arts
Kelly Belton, Community Representative, Cardinal Carter Academy of the Arts
Maria Rizzo, Trustee, Ward 5, Toronto Catholic District School Board
Omar Hassan

Communications (Community Council)

(January 31, 2015) E-mail from Xianxi Zeng (NY.Main.NY4.24.1)
(February 1, 2015) E-mail from Ka Wun Ng submitted by Crystal Ng (NY.Main.NY4.24.2)
(February 6, 2015) E-mail from Masoud Baharlouie (NY.New.NY4.24.3)
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Perry Shoom (NY.New.NY4.24.4)
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Charlie Morana, Senior Facilities Operations Manager, Aon Service Corporation (NY.New.NY4.24.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/comm/communicationfile-51290.pdf
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Steven J. O'Melia, Miller Thompson, LLP (NY.New.NY4.24.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/comm/communicationfile-51314.pdf
(February 18, 2015) Submission from Anne Benedetti, Goodmans, LLP, representing the applicant (NY.New.NY4.24.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ny/comm/communicationfile-51319.pdf

Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 4

SC4.1 - Permanent Closure of an Untraveled Portion of Finch Avenue East Abutting the South Limit of 5928-5930 Finch Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River

Public Notice Given

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the permanent closure of the untraveled  portion of the public highway abutting the south limit of 5928-5930 Finch Avenue East, designated as Part 1 as shown on Sketch No. PS-2012-007 (the "Highway"), attached to the report dated November 19, 2014, from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report dated November 19, 2014, from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the City of Toronto Act, 2006, of the proposed enactment of the draft by-law and was posted on the City’s web site.  No one appeared before the Community Council.

Origin

(November 19, 2014) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

Transportation Services recommends that the untraveled portion of Finch Avenue East, abutting the south limit of 5928-5930 Finch Avenue East be permanently closed.

Background Information (Community Council)

(November 19, 2014) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - Permanent Closure of an Untraveled Portion of Finch Avenue East Abutting the South Limit of 5928-5930 Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-74970.pdf
Attachment 1 - Sketch No. PS-2012-007, dated January 27, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-74971.pdf
Appendix A - Draft By-law to permanently close an untraveled portion of Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-74972.pdf
Public Notice - Proposal to permanently close an un-traveled portion of Finch Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-74973.pdf

SC4.5 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1076 Ellesmere Road, 385 Passmore Avenue, 1400 Neilson Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
37 - Scarborough Centre, 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bill 352 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Comunity Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below, as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880- Fire Routes ‑ 1076 Ellesmere Road, 385 Passmore Avenue, 1400 Neilson Road.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.

Origin

(January 21, 2015) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services

Summary

To obtain Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.

 

Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 21, 2015) Report from the Fire Chief and General Manager, Toronto Fire Services - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 1076 Ellesmere Road, 385 Passmore Avenue, 1400 Neilson Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75003.pdf
Attachment 1 - Amendment of Chapter 880 - Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75004.pdf

SC4.15 - TTC Queue Jump Lane - Finch Avenue East, West of Markham Road

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
41 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bill 346 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council designate the southerly eastbound lane on Finch Avenue East, between a point 50 metres west of Markham Road and a point 460 metres further west, as a reserved lane for public transit vehicles (PTVs).

 

2.         City Council designate the southerly eastbound lane on Finch Avenue East, between Markham Road and a point 50 metres west, for eastbound right turns only (buses excepted).

Origin

(January 16, 2015) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to seek authorization to install an eastbound transit queue jump lane for the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) on Finch Avenue East West of Markham Road. The TTC is seeking this reserved lane as a means to expedite their public transit vehicles (PTV) along this portion of Finch Avenue East.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 16, 2015) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District - TTC Queue Jump Lane - Finch Avenue East, West of Markham Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75178.pdf
Location Plan - Finch Avenue East, West of Markham Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75179.pdf

SC4.20 - 3615 McNicoll Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Attention
Bills 350 and 351 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 3615 McNicoll Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to report dated January 30, 2015, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 24982 for the lands at 3615 McNicoll Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to report dated January 30, 2015, from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning application proposes a 186 square metre vehicle fuel station with convenience store, a 280 square metre eating establishment with a drive-through facility, a two storey 2,250 square metre office building with ground floor retail, and two industrial buildings (1,338 square metres and 1,248 square metres respectively) at 3615 McNicoll Avenue.

 

The development consists of a mixture of commercial, office and industrial uses on a vacant site on a major arterial road. The proposal achieves a number of city goals and objectives. The development will add vitality to corner of Markham Road and McNicoll, providing employment opportunities and small scale service and retail opportunities for the local employment area on a major road.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 30, 2015) Report and Attachments 1-10 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 3615 McNicoll Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75307.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 3615 McNicoll Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75308.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) E-mail from Amy Vandendool, ROW Administrator, Enbridge Inc. (SC.Main.SC4.20. 1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/comm/communicationfile-50854.pdf
(February 2, 2015) E-mail from Walter H. Watt, Property Administrator, Trans-Northern (SC.Main.SC4.20.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/comm/communicationfile-50910.pdf

SC4.21 - 85 Keeler Boulevard - Zoning Amendment and Subdivision Applications - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
43 - Scarborough East
Attention
Bills 377 and 378 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Morningside Community Zoning By-law No. 11883, as amended, for the lands at 85 Keeler Boulevard substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report dated January 27, 2015, from the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 85 Keeler Boulevard substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report dated January 27, 2015, from the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.

 

4.         In accordance with the delegated approval under by-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 8 to the report dated January 27, 2015, from the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District, subject to:

 

a.         the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 8 to the report dated January 27, 2015, from the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior final approval and the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and

 

b.         any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

These applications propose a 51-unit residential subdivision comprised of 25 detached residential lots and 13 lots for a total of 26 semi-detached dwellings and a new 18.5 metre (60.7 foot) wide public street on a former school site at 85 Keeler Boulevard.

 

This proposal represents the residential infill and redevelopment of an underutilized, former public school site for detached dwellings.  The proposed new public street and lot orientation will continue the pattern of development that currently exists throughout this neighbourhood.  The proposal conforms to the Provincial Policy Statement, the Growth Plan and the Official Plan.  The proposed rezoning and draft plan of subdivision are considered appropriate for the use and development of the lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law and advises that the Chief Planner may approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) Report and Attachments 1-8 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 85 Keeler Boulevard - Zoning Amendment and Subdivision Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75334.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 85 Keeler Boulevard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75335.pdf

SC4.22 - 0 Clemes Drive - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
44 - Scarborough East
Attention
Bills 372 and 373 have been submitted on this Item.

Public Notice Given

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Centennial Community Zoning By-law No. 12077, as amended, for the lands at 0 Clemes Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to report dated January 29, 2015, from the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

2.         City Council amend City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, as amended, for the lands at 0 Clemes Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to report dated January 29, 2015, from the Director of Community Planning, Scarborough District.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 29, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District

Summary

This application proposes to rezone the lands at 0 Clemes Drive (the "Site") to permit the construction of seven detached dwellings. The ravine portion of the Site will be conveyed to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority, and re-zoned Major Open Spaces (O) Zone in the Centennial Community Zoning By-law No. 12077, as amended, and Open Space – Natural (ON) Zone in the City-wide Zoning By-law No. 569-2013, as amended.

 

The proposal conforms to the City's Official Plan and the Provincial Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe, and is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement. The proposed number of detached dwellings, along with their height, lot coverage, floor area and setbacks represent an appropriate and compatible form of infill development that will fit naturally into the surrounding neighbourhood. The rezoning of the ravine portion of the Site, which forms part of the Natural Heritage System, the Ravine By-law Protected area, and Toronto and Region Conservation Authority's Fill Regulated Area is appropriate for the future protection of the lands, and meets several important objectives of the land use, Green Space System and natural heritage system policies.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 29, 2015) Report and Attachments 1-7 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District - 0 Clemes Drive - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75339.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 0 Clemes Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-75340.pdf

SC4.23 - Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre

Community Council Recommendations

Scarborough Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following restaurants temporarily extending their patios during the Taste of Lawrence Festival on Friday, July 3, 2015 from 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 midnight; on Saturday, July 4, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight; and on Sunday, July 5, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.:

 

Winner's Bar & Grill – 2181 Lawrence Avenue East

Diana's Oyster Bar & Grill – 2105 Lawrence Avenue East

The Wexford Restaurant – 2072 Lawrence Avenue East

 

noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable by-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio areas extending into the City's right of way.

 

2.         City Council, for liquor licensing purposes, advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario, that it has no objection to granting a liquor license to the following Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto 2015 event:

 

Organization of Calypso Performing Artiste

Saturday, July 25, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

PC HO Cultural Centre - 5183 Sheppard Avenue East, Scarborough District, Ontario

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

Scarborough Community Council:

 

1.         Endorsed the twelfth annual Taste of Lawrence Festival, on Lawrence Avenue East between Warden Avenue and Birchmount Road, from July 3 to July 5, 2015 inclusive, and declared it to be an event of municipal and/or community significance.

 

2.         Endorsed the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto 2015, and declared it to be an event of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes.

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Letter from Wexford Heights Business Improvement Area, submitted by Councillor Thompson

Summary

Seeking Community Council's endorsement of an event for liquor licensing purposes.

Background Information (Community Council)

(February 11, 2015) Letter from Wexford Heights Business Improvement Area, submitted by Councillor Thompson regarding the Taste of Lawrence Festival
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-76670.pdf

23a - Events of Municipal Significance for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Origin
(February 13, 2015) Memo from Councillor Joe Mihevc
Summary

Seeking Community Council's endorsement of an event for liquor licensing purposes.

Background Information (Community Council)
(February 13, 2015) Memo from Councillor Mihevc - Request for Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes - Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-76704.pdf

Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 4

TE4.2 - Final Report - 1267 King Street West - Zoning Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend City-wide Zoning By-law 569-2013, for the lands at 1267 King Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (January 28, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 1267 King Street West, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (January 28, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council require the applicant pay cash-in-lieu for parkland, prior to bills, the amount to the satisfaction of the Director, Real Estate Services.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 28, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to legalize and maintain the existing three-storey, semi-detached building containing nine undersized bachelor units, and one, one-bedroom unit at 1267 King Street West. Currently, all ten dwelling units are occupied with tenants.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 28, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 1267 King Street West - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75316.pdf
Attachment 6: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment 438-86 - 1267 King Street West - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76441.pdf
Attachment 7: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment 569-2013 - 1267 King Street West - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76442.pdf

TE4.3 - Final Report - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment contained within Attachment 1, attached to the Supplementary Report (February 17, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         Prior to introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into agreement(s) pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure the facilities, services and matters as set out in Schedule A to Attachment 1 of the report (February 17, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

4.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council:

 

a.         Authorize the appropriate City officials and require the owner to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the protection and long-term maintenance of the designated heritage property at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

b.         Require the owner to provide a Dismantling, Storage and Reconstruction Plan for the Loblaws Groceteria Building, and provide a Letter of Credit to secure the work contained therein, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director City Planning Division.

 

c.         Require the owner to provide to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the City Solicitor, documentation demonstrating that there are existing rights of access in place benefitting the subject site to legal access over the portion of the proposed north-south private laneway which is located on the east side of the site.

 

d.         Require the owner to enter into the necessary agreements with the City, binding the owner and its successors on title, with the terms and conditions satisfactory to the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the City Solicitor, to secure among other matters all the technical matters as set out in Attachment 11 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

e.         Require the owner to withdraw their active appeal associated with a previous development proposal for this site (Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application File No. 04 200810 STE 20 OZ) that is currently before the Ontario Municipal Board and associated with the subject site.

 

f.          Require the owner to remove all signage, including roof top signage, from the plans on file with the City Planning Division, and make separate Sign By-law applications as appropriate.

 

5.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such action as may be necessary to implement the foregoing.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required. 

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council requested the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to report directly to City Council for its meeting on March 31, 2015, on:

 

1.         The possibility of redistributing parking between the residential and commercial components of the project at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West.

 

2.         Including in the Section 37 agreement a requirement to provide a minimum of 15 percent of 1-bedroom units that are either convertible to 2-bedroom units or can be combined through knockout panels between units, without any reduction in the number of 3-bedroom units.

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council considered together Items TE4.3, headed "Final Report - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications" and TE4.15, headed "Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West".

 

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the redevelopment of the site at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West with a 7-storey commercial building fronting onto Lake Shore Boulevard West, proposed to contain a grocery store with offices above, with two residential towers having heights of 40 and 44-storeys at the rear of the site.  The project also involves the dismantling, storage, and partial reconstruction of the designated heritage building that currently exists on the site.

 

Staff have been working with the applicant for several years to encourage the adaptive re-use of the landmark Loblaws Groceteria building and to incorporate a mix of uses including much needed local retail and office use.  It is important that the future reuse and redevelopment of this site be resolved now to advance the protection of this landmark heritage building and support reinvestment in one of the few remaining heritage sites in this community.  Staff are recommending Council approval of the project subject to resolution of a series of technical issues and entering into the necessary legal agreements.

 

Bills will be held until all necessary information has been secured and agreements entered into.  In the meantime, the applicant can move forward on measures to catalogue and protect elements of the heritage building to prevent further deterioration.  Council approval will also allow the applicant to advance investment in the important non-residential components of the project.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75672.pdf

Speakers

Corrie Galloway
Mario Silva, Toronto District School Board
Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown
Peter Clewes, Architects Alliance
Kevin McGeachy

Communications (Community Council)

(February 9, 2015) Letter from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh (TE.Supp.TE4.3.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51095.pdf
(February 13, 2015) E-mail from Kevin McGeachy (TE.Supp.TE4.3.2)
(February 13, 2015) Letter from Board of Directors, on behalf of Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2097 (TE.Supp.TE4.3.3)

3a - Supplementary Report - 500 Lake Shore Blvd West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications

Origin
(February 17, 2015) Report from Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District
Summary

A Final Report dated January 30, 2015 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District is before Community Council at its meeting of February 18, 2015.  The Final Report identifies that Planning Staff will report in a Supplementary Report to Community Council on the draft Zoning By-law.

 

This report contains the draft Zoning By-law for the proposal at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard.

Background Information (Community Council)
(February 17, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 500 Lake Shore Blvd West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Supplementary Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76693.pdf

TE4.4 - Final Report - 47-55 St George Street - Zoning Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
Bill 382 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended, for the lands at 47-55 St. George Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 10 to the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

3.         Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the applicant to:

 

            a.         Submit a Municipal Servicing Review Report for review and acceptance by the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a new 8-storey institutional building on the University of Toronto downtown campus at 47-55 St George Street. The building will contain the Centre of Engineering Innovation and Entrepreneurship related to the Faculty of Applied Science and Engineering. The proposal maintains the Physical Geography building at the south end of the site, but the existing building at 49-55 George Street will be demolished.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 47-55 St George Street - Zoning Amendment - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75318.pdf

Speakers

Raivo Uukkivi

Communications (Community Council)

(February 6, 2015) Letter from Grange Community Association, Harbord Village Residents Association, Annex Residents Association and Huron Sussex Residents Organization (TE.Supp.TE4.4.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51115.pdf

TE4.5 - Final Report - 97 Walmer Road and 88-100 Spadina Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Conversion Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands at 97 Walmer Road and 88-100 Spadina Road substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (January 26, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended by Site Specific By-law 1091-2005, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (January 26, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

3.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 569-2013, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 7 to the report (January 26, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

 

5.         City Council approve the application for a Section 111 permit in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 to allow the conversion through severance of a rental housing property with more than six residential rental units into two lots, one of which will have fewer than six residential rental units, subject to the following conditions:

 

a.         The maintenance of 215 existing residential rental units at 100 Spadina Road as rental housing for a minimum period of ten (10) years commencing from the date an Official Plan Amendment comes into full force and effect.

 

b.         The owner shall provide two of the units in condition 5.a. above at affordable rents for a period of at least ten (10) years commencing from the date they are first occupied.

 

c.         The provision by the owner of financial compensation to the one affected tenant in the rental building at 97 Walmer Road that will be separately conveyed, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.

 

d.         The owner applies for, and obtains a Consent from the Committee of Adjustment to permit the severance of the lands into two lots and the separate conveyance of the lot at 97 Walmer Road.

 

e.         The owner enters into and registers on title for the portion of the property known as 100 Spadina Road, an agreement to secure the conditions 5.a., b. and c. above to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

6.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to issue the Preliminary Approval of the Section 111 permit to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the latest of the following has occurred:

 

a.         The Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments have come into full force and effect.

 

b.         The owner obtains a Consent from the Committee of Adjustment to permit the severance of the lands into two lots and the separate conveyance of the lot at 97 Walmer Road.

 

c.         The owner satisfies the condition in part 5.e. above.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act and with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act.

Origin

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law relates to the severance of the three-unit rental property located at 97 Walmer Road from a parcel which includes two rental apartment buildings located at 88 and 100 Spadina Road. The properties are currently under single legal ownership and regulated by Site Specific By-law 1091-2005.  The owner proposes to sever and convey the 97 Walmer Road property while retaining the remainder of the lands (88 and 100 Spadina Road).  The existing 22-storey rental apartment building at 100 Spadina Road and six-storey rental apartment building at 88 Spadina Road will be maintained.  Ten three-storey stacked townhouse condominium units adjacent to the property and located at 99A-105B Walmer Road and 111A-111B Bernard Avenue are not affected by the proposed severance.

 

See Attachment 1 for the Plan of Survey showing the subject site and existing building footprints.  See Attachment 2 for the proposed severance plan of 97 Walmer Road.

 

An Official Plan Amendment and a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 are required in order to allow a severance of a rental property that consists of six or more rental units that will result in a lot being created with less than six rental dwelling units.  A Zoning By-law Amendment is required to amend Zoning By-law 438-86, as amended by Site Specific By-law 1091-2005, by reducing the total number of rental dwelling units required to be maintained on the lands.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications for an Official Plan Amendment, a Zoning By-law Amendment and a Section 111 permit, and recommends that City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to issue a permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 97 Walmer Road and 88-100 Spadina Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment and Rental Housing Conversion Applications - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75120.pdf

TE4.6 - Final Report - 11 Lillian Street and 132 - 142 Soudan Avenue - Zoning Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes a 14-storey residential building at 11 Lillian Street and 132-142 Soudan Avenue.  The proposed building has 98 residential units and a total density of 7.96 times the lot area.  It has an 11-storey tower that sits on top of a 3-storey base.  The base contains four grade-related units facing the Neighbourhoods designated area on the south side of Soudan Avenue.  The application proposes 84 parking spaces in a 4-level underground garage.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.  The proposed development fits its context in an Apartment Neighbourhood, provides an acceptable transition in height to the Neighbourhood area to the south, given the overall context, minimizes negative impacts from its built form, and conforms to applicable policies of the Official Plan.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Final Report - 11 Lillian Street and 132 - 142 Soudan Avenue - Zoning Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75627.pdf

Speakers

Peter Heywood
Adrian Mann
Ralph Giannone, Giannone Petrilone Architects
Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown
Haley Waxberg
Irene Goulimis

Communications (Community Council)

(February 11, 2015) E-mail from Peter Heywood (TE.Supp.TE4.6.1)
(February 12, 2015) E-mail from Wendy Teske McClean (TE.Supp.TE4.6.2)
(February 16, 2015) E-mail from Andy Senyi, Jilsen Investments Inc. and Jeff and Rosanna Weisman (TE.Supp.TE4.6.3)
(February 18, 2015) Letter from Nadine Hart and Luis De Jesus (TE.Supp.TE4.6.4)

TE4.7 - Final Report - 197 Redpath Avenue and 95 and 99 Broadway Avenue - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the application to demolish the 32 existing residential rental units located in the residential rental apartment building at 197 Redpath Avenue pursuant to Municipal Code Chapters 667 and 363 subject to the following conditions under Chapter 667 which provide for the replacement of rental housing as outlined in the report (January 21, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, titled:  "197 Redpath Avenue and 95 and 99 Broadway Avenue - Residential Rental Demolition Application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Final Report":

 

a.         The owner shall provide and maintain thirty-two (32) residential rental units on the subject site as rental housing for a period of at least 20 years, comprising 7 bachelor, 9 one-bedroom, 8 two-bedroom and 8 three-bedroom units, as shown on the plans submitted to the City Planning Division, dated December 10, 2014, with any revisions to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, and of which at least 4 bachelors, 3 one-bedroom, 3 two-bedroom and 4 three-bedroom units shall have affordable rents and the remainder shall have rents no higher than mid-range rents.

 

b.         The owner shall provide tenant relocation assistance to eligible tenants, including: an extended notice period; financial assistance beyond the minimums of the Residential Tenancies Act; and the right to return to a replacement rental unit for all of the tenants (the "Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan"), and that the Tenant Relocation and Assistance Plan shall be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

c.         The owner shall enter into and register on title one or more Section 111 Agreement(s) to secure the conditions outlined in 1.a. and b. above and as described in the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached hereto as Attachment 2 to the report (January 21, 2015) from the Director, City Planning, Toronto and East York District, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

d.         The owner shall enter into and register on title, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act (to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor) agreeing not to transfer or charge those parts of the lands, comprising the 32 replacement rental units, without the written consent of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or her designate, to assist with securing the Section 111 Agreement against future owners and encumbrances of the lands until such time as the City Solicitor determines that its registration on title is no longer required to secure the provisions of the Section 111 Agreement.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to issue preliminary approval to the application under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the latest of the following has occurred:

 

a.         Satisfaction or securing of the conditions in part 1 above.

 

b.         After the Zoning By-law Amendment for the proposed development approved in principle by the Ontario Municipal Board on June 19, 2014 has come into full force and effect.

 

c.         The issuance of the Notice Of Approval Conditions for site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.

 

3.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a Section 111 permit under Municipal Code Chapter 667 after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, has issued the preliminary approval referred to in part 2. above.

 

4.         City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a permit under Section 33 of the Planning Act for all of the structures at 197 Redpath Avenue and 95 and 99 Broadway Avenue no earlier than issuance of the first building permit for excavation and shoring of the development approved by the OMB on June 19, 2014, and as provided for in the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as attached to the report (January 21, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and after the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, has issued the preliminary approval referred to in part 2 above, which permit may be included in the demolition permit for Chapter 667 under 363-11.1 of the Municipal Code, on condition that:

 

a.         the owner erect a residential building on site no later than four (4) years from the day demolition of the buildings is commenced; and

 

b.         should the owner fail to complete the new building within the time specified in Condition 4.a. above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in a like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for each dwelling unit for which a demolition permit is issued, and that each sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land for which the demolition permit is issued.

 

5.         City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to take such actions as are necessary to implement the foregoing, including execution of the Section 111 Agreement.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act.

Origin

(January 21, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

An application has been made to demolish a three storey, 32 residential rental unit building, comprising 7 bachelor, 9 one-bedroom, 8 two-bedroom and 8 three-bedroom units at 197 Redpath Avenue and two previously owner-occupied houses at 95 and 99 Broadway Avenue.  The demolition of the rental housing is prohibited without a Section 111 permit issued under the City of Toronto’s Rental Housing Demolition and Conversion By-law (Chapter 667 of the Municipal Code).  The owner is proposing to replace the 32 residential rental units in a new condominium development.  The replacement rental units are proposed to be on the third and fourth floors of the new building.  The owner has obtained approval from the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) to construct two new 34 storey towers, inclusive of a seven storey podium, with the full replacement of the 32 existing rental units within the building.

 

The Zoning By-law Amendment application for the proposed redevelopment was appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) on May 24, 2013.  In September 2013, City Council directed staff to oppose the development at the Board.  The proposal was revised in December 2013, reducing the total height from 38 storeys to 34 storeys.  City Council directed Staff to continue to oppose the revised proposal.  The rezoning to permit the proposed redevelopment was approved in principle by the OMB on June 19, 2014, with the order withheld until certain conditions, including finalizing the form of the by-law and securing a Section 37 Agreement that includes the replacement of rental housing.

 

This report provides the results of the negotiations on the rental housing matters, an overview of the development approved by the OMB and recommends the approval of a Section 111 permit under Chapter 667 and Chapter 363 of the Municipal Code for the demolition of the 32 existing rental units, subject to conditions.  The conditions include the full replacement of the 32 rental units and the provision of tenant relocation assistance for eligible tenants, including the right for all tenants to return to occupy a rental unit in the new building.  This report recommends entering into an Agreement under Section 111 to secure these conditions.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 21, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 197 Redpath Avenue and 95 and 99 Broadway Avenue - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75314.pdf

TE4.8 - Final Report - Downtown East Planning Study - Official Plan Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Communications TE4.8.6 to TE4.8.9 have been submitted on this Item.

Bill 379 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend the Official Plan, for the lands bounded approximately by Jarvis Street, Carlton Street, Sherbourne Street and Queen Street East (see Attachment No. 1 in the report [January 22, 2015] from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District) substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 2 in the report (January 22, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, and titled "Downtown East Planning Study - Official Plan Amendment - Final Report", with the following amendments to Attachment No. 2:

 

a.         Add the following new Objective 2.3, and renumber the remaining objectives as 2.4, 2.5 and 2.6 accordingly:

 

"2.3      Community development initiatives in the Garden District will focus on achieving greater levels of equity, equality, access, participation, social cohesion and community capacity. To achieve this, plans and strategies will be developed for the Garden District to assist in optimizing the delivery of community and social services, improve community safety, pursue local housing initiatives, and stimulate local economic development."

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 22, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On August 25, 2014, Toronto City Council adopted the recommendations of the report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, dated July 8, 2014, titled: "Downtown East Planning Study - Official Plan Amendment - Status Report".  The recommendations in that report directed Staff to bring forward the Downtown East Planning Study for a statutory meeting once the Heritage Conservation District Study had been completed.  To date, the Garden District Heritage Conservation District Plan has not been completed.

 

Although the Heritage Conservation District Study has not been completed, staff have had a number of inquiries for new development applications in the study area.  Staff, therefore, initiated a review of the Garden District Site and Area Specific Policy by the retained consultants (MacNaughton, Hermsen, Britton, Clarkson Planning Ltd. "MHBC") for the Heritage Conservation District Study.

 

On December 10, 2014, a comprehensive memorandum was received by the consultants with a number of suggested changes to the policies.  Those changes have been incorporated into a revised set of policies for the Garden District.

 

City Planning Staff have also taken this opportunity to correct technical errors and clarify the language and direction in some of the policies, which are explained below.  The Garden District Site and Area Specific Policy is intended to provide clear direction to stakeholders on the expectations of the City of Toronto and the community.  Development pressure has increased in the area since the last Staff report and it is prudent to adopt the Official Plan Amendment implementing the Garden District Site and Area Specific Policy prior to the completion of the Heritage Conservation District process.

 

City Planning Staff, having consulted Heritage Preservation Services and MHBC Planning are satisfied that the proposed Official Plan Amendment will not conflict with the direction of the Heritage Conservation District Study and are recommending that City Council adopt the proposed Amendment.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 22, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Final Report - Downtown East Planning Study - Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75629.pdf

Speakers

Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP
Andrew Hoffman, President, Centrecourt Developments

Communications (Community Council)

(February 11, 2015) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP (TE.Supp.TE4.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51143.pdf
(February 13, 2015) Letter from Michael S. Goldberg, Goldberg Group, on behalf of Abtil Realty Limited (TE.Supp.TE4.8.2)
(February 17, 2015) Letter from Denise Baker, WeirFoulds LLP (TE.Supp.TE4.8.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51253.pdf
(February 17, 2015) E-mail from Mehrzad Taghizadeh (TE.Supp.TE4.8.4)
(February 18, 2015) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP, on behalf of Dundas Residences Inc. (TE.Supp.TE4.8.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51280.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(March 12, 2015) Letter from Kim M. Kovar, Aird & Berlis LLP (CC.Main.TE4.8.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-51974.pdf
(March 20, 2015) Letter from Robert A. Dragicevic, MCIP, RPP, Senior Principal, WND Associates (CC.Main.TE4.8.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-51975.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Letter from Patrick J. Devine, Devine Park LLP (CC.Main.TE4.8.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-51971.pdf
(March 30, 2015) Letter from David Bronskill, Goodmans LLP (CC.New.TE4.8.9)

TE4.9 - Request for Direction Report - 81 Wellesley Street East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to oppose the applicant's appeal respecting the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications for 81 Wellesley Street East and attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in opposition to such appeal.

 

2.         City Council authorize City Planning in consultation with the local Ward Councillor to secure services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as may be required by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, should the proposal be approved in some form by the Ontario Municipal Board.

 

3.         City Council authorize City staff to continue discussions with the applicant on a revised proposal which addresses the issues set out in the report (January 16, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

4.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning and other appropriate staff, to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the appeal to Official Plan Amendment No. 183 (OPA No. 183), being the North Downtown Yonge Site and Area Specific Policy 382 as it relates to 81 Wellesley Street East.

Origin

(January 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment applications have been submitted to permit the development of a 28-storey building (88.7 metres, plus 7 metres for the mechanical room) on the subject site at 81 Wellesley Street East, which is located on the south side of Wellesley Street East, east of Church Street.

 

The overall development would have a total gross floor area of 15,033 square metres, consisting of 14,897 square metres of residential and 136 square metres of non-residential on the ground floor, resulting in a floor space index of 15.97 times the lot area.  The development would include 182 residential units, consisting of: 22 bachelor units, 108 one bedroom units; 31 two bedroom units; and 21 three bedroom units.

 

The Official Plan and Zoning Amendment applications have been referred to the Ontario Municipal Board by the applicant due to Council's failure to make a decision on the applications within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  A pre-hearing was held on October 31, 2014 and a full hearing at the Ontario Municipal Board is scheduled to commence on April 20, 2015.

This report reviews and recommends refusal of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.

 

The proposal represents an over-development of the site and does not fit within its existing and planned context and does not conform to the intent of the existing Official Plan policies, including Site and Area Specific Policy 155 and the recent Council-adopted Official Plan policies and guidelines for the Church Street Village Character Area (North Downtown Yonge Site and Area Specific Policy 382 - Official Plan Amendment 183), which require new development to respect and reinforce the low-rise scale of existing development in this area.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 16, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Request for Direction Report - 81 Wellesley Street East - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75626.pdf

Speakers

Michael Adams
Paul Farrelly

Communications (Community Council)

(February 15, 2015) E-mail from Andrew Horberry (TE.Supp.TE4.9.1)

TE4.10 - Final Report - 341-355 Yonge Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 353 has been submitted on this Item.

Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 and 1326-2011 for the lands at 341-355 Yonge Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (January 29, 2015) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 29, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to permit the reconfiguration of the ground floor and basement levels of the Ryerson Student Learning Centre.  The proposal includes replacing below-grade retail uses with institutional uses, reducing the number of required retail units from 2 to 1 while maintaining retail uses on the ground floor, reducing the minimum retail store frontage along Yonge Street from 34 metres to 27 metres, and allowing for an increase in total non-residential gross floor area by approximately 410 square metres.

 

At their meeting on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2012, City Council approved the zoning by-law amendment application file No. 11 146654 STE 27 OZ to permit the 9-storey Ryerson Student Learning Centre on the subject site.  The building is currently nearing completion and is expected to open in March, 2015.

 

The proposed changes to the zoning by-law will continue to implement the Official Plan including site specific Official Plan Policy 174.

 

This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 29, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 341-355 Yonge Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75315.pdf

Speakers

Michael Bissett, Bousfields Inc.

Communications (Community Council)

(February 6, 2015) Letter from Mark Garner, Executive Director and CSO, Downtown Yonge BIA, addressed to the Manager, Community Planning, in support of the application (TE.Supp.TE4.10.1)

TE4.12 - Request for Direction Report - 309 Cherry Street - Zoning Amendment Application

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board not schedule a hearing on the appeal of the zoning amendment application for 309 Cherry Street, as the application and its appeal are considered premature until such time as the Province has approved the Lower Don Lands Infrastructure Environmental Assessment, and City Council has made decisions on the Port Lands Planning Framework and Villiers Island Precinct Plan. 

 

2.         City Council direct City Planning staff to evaluate this application in the context of the Port Lands Planning Framework and Villiers Island Precinct Plan currently under development, and report to City Council on the evaluation and review of the application shortly after the completion of these planning initiatives.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council directed that:

 

1.         Staff schedule a community consultation meeting for the zoning amendment application, together with the Ward Councillor, after a decision has been rendered on the Port Lands Planning Framework and Villiers Island Precinct Plan.

 

2.         Notice for the community consultation meeting be given to landowners and residents within 120 metres of the site.

 

3.         Notice for the public meeting under the Planning Act be given according to the regulations of the Planning Act.

Origin

(January 14, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

This application proposes to amend the former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86 to permit a mixed-use development comprising an eight-storey office/retail base building, 26-storey residential tower and two partially retained heritage buildings on the northerly portion of the existing industrial property at 309 Cherry Street. The application was originally submitted in March 2012, however, since May 2012 and until recently, the application had been held in abeyance at the applicant's request. Initially it was held in abeyance pending completion of the first phase of the Port Lands Acceleration Initiative (PLAI), and subsequently pending completion of the Villiers Island Precinct Plan. While significant progress has been made on the planning initiatives currently underway in the second phase of the PLAI, including the Villiers Island Precinct Plan and Port Lands Planning Framework, they are still in process. The majority of work on these planning initiatives is currently targeted for completion by the end of the second quarter 2015. 

 

In October 2014, the applicant appealed City Council's lack of decision on the application to the Ontario Municipal Board.  As the application had been held in abeyance until recently, no preliminary report had been brought forward to Toronto and East York Community Council. As such, the purpose of this report is three-fold: 1) to provide preliminary information on the application; 2) to seek City Council's direction on the OMB appeal; and 3) to outline the process for the evaluation and review of the application given that precinct planning for the area is still underway. 

 

It is important to note that this report is not an evaluation of the merits of the application. It is staff's opinion that the application is premature given that the Lower Don Lands Infrastructure EA has yet to be approved by the Province, the planning initiatives underway in the Port Lands as part of the second phase of the PLAI have yet to be completed, and a response to the business case submitted to the provincial and federal governments for two-thirds funding of the required Lower Don River flood protection works and enabling infrastructure has not been fully considered.  A final report to consider this application is targeted shortly after the completion and approval of the above, provided all required information to complete the review of the application is submitted by the applicant in a timely manner.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 14, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 309 Cherry Street - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75119.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(February 18, 2015) Letter from Christopher J. Williams, Aird & Berlis LLP, on behalf of 203405 Ontario Limited (TE.Supp.TE4.12.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51279.pdf

TE4.13 - Request for Directions Report - 143 Avenue Road - Zoning Amendment

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) to oppose the OMB appeal made by the applicant for Zoning By-law Amendment Application No. 13 223368 STE 27 OZ.

 

2.         City Council instruct the City Solicitor to advise the OMB that Council would support alternative Built Form Criteria for the lands known municipally as 143 Avenue Road substantially as set out in Attachment Nos. 9 and 10 to the report (January 21, 2015), from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as noted within the report.

Origin

(January 21, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District

Summary

On December 2, 2014, the City Clerk's Office received notification that the applicant filed an appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB), citing Council's failure to make a decision on the application within the respective timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act.  A pre-hearing meeting is scheduled for February 26, 2015.  The purpose of this report is to seek direction from City Council on the position to be taken at the forthcoming OMB hearing.

 

The application is to permit a 12-storey, 42.0 metre (including the mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building at 143 Avenue Road.  The proposal includes 117 dwelling units, approximately 822 square metres of retail/commercial space and 70 parking spaces in a 3-level underground parking garage.

 

The proposed building height, massing and setbacks represent overdevelopment of the site and would set a negative precedent in terms of the City's built form policies for infill development.  It also has a measurable impact on the abutting property to the east.

 

The proposal, in its current form, does not conform to the Official Plan, and is inconsistent with Council approved guidelines.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 21, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 143 Avenue Road - Zoning Amendment - Request for Directions Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75317.pdf

Speakers

Robert Fuller, President, MTCC 795

TE4.14 - Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 62 and 64 Charles Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (TE4.14a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into a heritage easement agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owners of 62 Charles Street East and 64 Charles Street East in a form and content satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor.

 

2.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council authorizing the entering into of the heritage easement agreement for the properties at 62 Charles Street East and 64 Charles Street East.

Origin

(January 28, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that Toronto City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the properties at 62 and 64 Charles Street East and that Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council to this effect.  The subject properties are included as part of proposed development that would allow for the construction of a new 55 storey residential tower and an 8 storey office building.  A Heritage Easement Agreement will allow for the protection of the designated heritage properties in perpetuity. 

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 28, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 62 and 64 Charles Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75702.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(February 23, 2015) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 62 and 64 Charles Street East (TE4.14a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78252.pdf

TE4.15 - Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (TE4.15a with recommendations)

Bill 371 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consent to the demolition of the designated property at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West under Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act subject to the following terms and conditions:

 

a.         Prior to introduction of Bills in Council for Official Plan and  Zoning By-law Amendment Application File No.13 204585 STE 20 OZ, the owner shall:

 

i.          Enter into and register a Heritage Easement Agreement with the City for the protection and long-term maintenance of the heritage property located at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West to the satisfaction of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor. The HEA will secure all of the conditions contained in this report.

 

ii.         Provide a detailed Dismantling, Storage and Reconstruction Plan, satisfactory to the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services, to be prepared by a qualified heritage consultant that:

 

a.         details the dismantling, storage and reconstruction of the south and west elevations with partial reconstruction of the east elevation of the Loblaw Groceteria Building in accordance with the February 5, 2015 Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. and includes photo-documentation of the as-found condition of the heritage structure; and

 

b.         include a detailed cost estimate with descriptions and specifications for the work for the purpose of an indexed Letter of Credit to be secured within the Heritage Easement Agreement.

 

b.         Prior to final Site Plan Approval for Official Plan and  Zoning By-law Amendment Application File No.13 204585 STE 20 OZ, the owner shall prepare and provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and in accordance with the approved Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc. dated February 5, 2015 and the approved Dismantling, Storage and Reconstruction Plan:

 

i.          site plans and drawings;

 

ii.         a detailed Landscape Plan that supports the architectural style of the heritage building including reference to materials and finishes;

 

iii.        a Lighting Plan including building and site lighting;

 

iv.        a Signage Plan for first party signage;

 

v.         an Interpretation Plan including interpretive elements regarding the property's heritage values, site history and archaeological resources as may be applicable, an implementation schedule and a budget;

 

vi.        a letter of credit to secure the implementation of the approved Interpretation Plan;

 

vii.       a record of the as-found condition of the building including architectural drawings and photographs keyed to plans and elevations of all visible interiors and exteriors.

 

c.         Prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the proposal, including a heritage permit related to dismantling, demolition, shoring, excavation and rebuilding of any building or structure on the subject property:

 

i.          the owner shall have received approval from City Council for the related Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment, and satisfied all of the conditions contained in 1(a) above;

 

ii.         the owner shall provide a Letter of Credit, in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to secure all work included in the implementation of the approved Dismantling, Storage and Reconstruction Plan;

 

iii         the owner shall provide an archaeological monitoring and mitigation strategy prepared by a licensed consultant archaeologist to ensure that any deeply buried archaeological features associated with the property are documented fully during the excavation process; and

 

iv         the owner shall provide a Construction Management Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services that details the protection of all municipal infrastructure on the subject property, to be implemented with the commencement of the first permit release.

 

d.         Prior to the release of the Letters of Credit, the owner shall:

 

i.          implement the Dismantling, Storage and Reconstruction Plan, including the Interpretation Plan, Lighting Plan and Signage Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services;

 

ii.         provide a Letter of Substantial Completion for the reconstruction of 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West, and for the implementation of the Interpretation Plan, signed by the project architect and heritage consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

2.         City Council require the owner to withdraw its appeal of the demolition permit currently before the Ontario Municipal Board and, in the event that the owner does not withdraw its appeal of the demolition permit on the basis of Council’s proposed consent on the terms and conditions specified in Recommendation No. 1, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request that the Ontario Municipal Board dismiss the appeal or that identical terms and conditions be required in any Order of the Board requiring that the municipality consent to the demolition or removal of a building or structure pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         City Council grant authority for execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement to secure heritage matters related to 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act and authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bill in Council.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council considered together Items TE4.3, headed "Final Report - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications" and TE4.15, headed "Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West".

Origin

(February 12, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report relates to the OPA and Zoning By-law Amendment applications received by City Planning in connection with a new Loblaws facility to be located at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West. 

 

This report recommends that City Council consent to the demolition and partial reconstruction of the designated heritage property located at 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West, (Attachment 1) with conditions. City Council consent is required for the proposed demolition under Section 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

As part of a previous application, City Council approved the demolition of the entire building with provision for the reconstruction of the south and west walls, using new and salvaged materials. Within the current proposal, the applicant has designed a similar approach to the dismantling, storage and reconstruction of the south and west walls but the strategy now includes partial reconstruction of the east wall of the building and a multi-storey rooftop addition.

Background Information (Community Council)

(February 12, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76419.pdf
(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75707.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(February 23, 2015) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Demolition of a Structure on a Designated Heritage Property - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West (TE4.15a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78248.pdf

Speakers

Corrie Galloway
Mario Silva, Toronto District School Board
Adam J. Brown, Sherman Brown
Peter Clewes, Architects Alliance
Kevin McGeachy

Communications (Community Council)

(February 9, 2015) Letter from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh (TE.Supp.TE4.15.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51258.pdf
(February 13, 2015) E-mail from Kevin McGeachy (TE.Supp.TE4.15.2)
(February 13, 2015) Letter from Board of Directors, on behalf of Toronto Standard Condominium Corporation No. 2097 (TE.Supp.TE4.15.3)

TE4.16 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 40 Hanna Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (TE4.16a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 40 Hanna Avenue (Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company Complex) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 40 Hanna Avenue (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (January 26, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

2.         If there are no objections to the designation in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

3.         If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.         If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the designation of the property.

 

5.         City Council grant authority for the execution of a Heritage Easement Agreement under Section 37 of the Ontario Heritage Act with the owner of the property at 40 Hanna Avenue.

 

6.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bills in Council authorizing the entering into of the Heritage Easement Agreement.

Origin

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the property at 40 Hanna Avenue (which includes convenience addresses at 99 Atlantic Avenue, 38 Hanna Avenue, 2, 22, 24 and 24A Liberty Street and 1 Snooker Street) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and to grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement with the property owners.  Located on Hanna Avenue where it extends from Liberty Street to Snooker Street in Liberty Village, the site contains a former manufacturing complex originally developed by the Brunswick-Balke-Collender Company that is listed on the City of Toronto's heritage register (formerly known as the Inventory of Heritage Properties).

 

The owners have submitted an application to develop the site, which would preserve the existing factory buildings and the detached boiler house and smokestack while removing the more recent additions to the property. 

 

The property at 40 Hanna Avenue is being recommended for designation at this time to ensure that all of the heritage values and attributes of the site are identified and protected.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 40 Hanna Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75620.pdf
Attachment 1 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 40 Hanna Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75621.pdf
Attachment 2 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 40 Hanna Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75622.pdf
Attachment 3 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 40 Hanna Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75623.pdf
Attachment 4 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 40 Hanna Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75624.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(February 23, 2015) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement - 40 Hanna Avenue (TE4.16a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78238.pdf

TE4.17 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Inclusion on the Heritage Register - 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a transmittal on this Item (TE4.17a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council include the property at 189 Mutual Street (John W. Hare house) on the City of Toronto Heritage Register.

 

2.         City Council include the property at 191 Mutual Street (Samuel G. Watson house) on the City of Toronto Heritage Register.

 

3.         City Council include the property at 193 Mutual Street (Mary A. Strutt house) on the City of Toronto Heritage Register.

 

4.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 189 Mutual Street (John W. Hare house) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

5.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 191 Mutual Street (Samuel G. Watson house) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

6.         City Council state its intention to designate the property at 193 Mutual Street (Mary A. Strutt house) under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street (Reasons for Designation) attached as Attachment No. 3 to the report (January 30, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division.

 

7.         If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bill in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

8.         If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.

 

9.         If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designation of the properties.

Origin

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 189, 191 and 193 Mutual Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act for their cultural heritage value and include the properties on the City of Toronto Heritage Register.  The three properties are two-and-a-half-storey brick row houses, built in 1887 and located on the east side of Mutual Street, north of Gerrard Street East.

 

Following research and evaluation, staff have determined that the properties at 189, 191 and 193 Mutual Street meet Ontario Regulation 9/06, the provincial criteria prescribed for municipal designation under the Ontario Heritage Act.  The designation of the properties and their inclusion on the City of Toronto Heritage Register would identify the properties' cultural heritage values and heritage attributes and enable City Council to control alterations to the site, enforce heritage property standards and maintenance, and refuse demolition.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Inclusion on the Heritage Register - 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75712.pdf
Attachment 1 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Inclusion on the Heritage Register - 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75713.pdf
Attachment 2 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Inclusion on the Heritage Register - 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75715.pdf
Attachment 3 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Inclusion on the Heritage Register - 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75716.pdf
Attachment 4 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Inclusion on the Heritage Register - 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75717.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(February 23, 2015) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Inclusion on the Heritage Register - 189, 191, 193 Mutual Street (TE4.17a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78251.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(February 17, 2015) Letter from Denise Baker, WeirFoulds LLP, solicitor for the owner of lands municipally known as 189, 191and 193 Mutual Street. (TE.Supp.TE4.17.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51255.pdf

TE4.18 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property with a Heritage Easement Agreement - 317 Dundas Street West (The Grange)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a revised transmittal on this Item (TE4.18a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council submits the item to Council without recommendation.

Origin

(February 5, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division

Summary

This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations to the designated heritage property at 317 Dundas Street West (The Grange) to allow for the implementation of the Grange Park Revitalization Project. A cultural heritage landscape of local, City-wide and national significance, this Project is the achievement of a partnership of the AGO with the City in consultation with the Grange Park Advisory Committee and other neighbourhood stakeholders. The purpose of this report is to ensure the conservation of the cultural heritage value of this important heritage property as per the legislative requirements of s.33 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information (Community Council)

(February 5, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property with a Heritage Easement Agreement - 317 Dundas Street West (The Grange)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76414.pdf
Attachments 1-3 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property with a Heritage Easement Agreement - 317 Dundas Street West (The Grange)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76415.pdf
Attachments 4-6 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property with a Heritage Easement Agreement - 317 Dundas Street West (The Grange)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76416.pdf
(January 30, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property with a Heritage Easement Agreement - 317 Dundas Street West (The Grange) - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75313.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(March 25, 2015) Revised transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property with a Heritage Easement Agreement - 317 Dundas Street West (The Grange) (TE4.18a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78371.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(February 14, 2015) Letter from Max Allen, Vice-President, Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, Hon. President, and Nick Schefter, Vice-President, Grange Community Association (TE.Supp.TE4.18.1)
(February 15, 2015) Letter from Ceta Ramkhalawansingh, Grange Park Preservation Group (TE.Supp.TE4.18.2)
(February 17, 2015) Letter from Michael J. Mahoney, Executive Director, Corporate Special Projects and Director, Operations, Art Gallery of Ontario (TE.Supp.TE4.18.3)

Declared Interests (Community Council)

The following member(s) declared an interest:

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam - in that her family owns a business on McCaul Street as well as a family home on Beverley Street, within the notification area of 317 Dundas Street West.

TE4.19 - Amendment of Designating By-law and Revised Approval Conditions for Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a Transmittal on this Item (TE4.19a with recommendations)

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.        City Council adopt the following recommendations pertaining to the designating by-law for 26 Lombard Street:

 

1.         City Council state its intention to amend former City of Toronto By-law No. 532-82 to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the Statement of Significance: 26 Lombard Street (R. G. McLean Company Building and Barclay, Clark and Company Building) attached as Attachment 4 to the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning Division, to explain the cultural heritage value or interest of the properties and describe their heritage attributes.

 

2.         If there are no objections to the proposed amendment in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council amending designating By-law No. 531-82.

 

3.         If there are objections in accordance with the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed amendment to the Conservation Review Board.

 

4.         If the proposed amendment is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision to amend the designating by-law.

 

B.        City Council revise its decision of August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014 respecting TE34.39 by deleting Part 1. of such decision and substituting the following in its place:

 

1.         City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 26 Lombard Street, in accordance with Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, to allow for the construction on the lands comprising 20 and 26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East of a maximum 45-storey residential tower and up to the specified heights in metres shown in the applicant's revised plans dated August 12, 2014, and the applicant's correspondence dated August 18, 2014, and described in the report (August 21, 2014) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, incorporating the heritage buildings to be retained in situ and conserved on the lands known municipally in 2014 as 26 Lombard Street, with such alterations to be substantially in accordance with plans and drawings dated June 28, 2013 and revised July 7, 2014, prepared by Architects Alliance, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA), prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 28, 2013 and revised July 8, 2014, and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, (the "Alterations") and subject to the following additional conditions:

 

a.         That the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed Alterations is supported by City Council, and has come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, including incorporating provisions relating to the issuance of phased permit permissions set forth in this Part 1. in the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, into the Appendix 1 (Section 37 Planning Act provisions) of such Zoning By-law Amendment and the required Section 37 Agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

b.         That prior to any Ontario Municipal Board Order issuing in connection with the Zoning By-law Amendment appeal, the owner shall have:

 

i.            Entered into a Heritage Easement Agreement for the properties at 20 and 26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East, in accordance with the Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 28, 2013 and revised July 8, 2014, drawings dated June 28, 2013 and revised July 7, 2014, prepared by Architects Alliance and on file with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and subject to and in accordance with a Conservation Plan approved by the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, including registration of such agreement to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor.

 

ii.           Provided a Conservation Plan, prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, that is consistent with the conservation strategy set out in the Heritage Impact Statement for the property located at 26 Lombard Street, dated June 28, 2013 and revised July 8, 2014, and that is to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services (the "Approved Conservation Plan").

 

iii.          Entered into and registered on the properties at 20 and 26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East one or more agreements with the City pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to further secure the facilities, services and matters set forth in Parts 1 a., c. and d. in the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, and with such facilities, services and matters to be set forth in the related site specific Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations, all to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division and the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

c.         That prior to Final Site Plan approval and prior to any permit issuing for the properties at  20 and 26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East, including a heritage permit or a building permit but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance of the existing heritage building:

 

i.          The owner shall provide final Site Plan drawings including drawings related to an Approved Conservation Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         The related Zoning By-law Amendment giving rise to the proposed alterations shall be in full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to the City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

d.         That prior to the issuance of any permit for all or any part of the properties at 20 and 26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East, including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual minor works acceptable to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for the existing heritage buildings, the owner shall have:

 

i.          Obtained final approval for the necessary Zoning By-law amendment required for the Alterations to the property at 26 Lombard Street, and such amendment shall have come into full force and effect in a form and with content acceptable to City Council, as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.         Obtained final Site Plan approval for the Alterations permitted by the City Council for the properties at 20 and 26 Lombard Street and 25 Richmond Street East, issued by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and with content acceptable to such Manager.

 

iii.        Provided full building permit drawings, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the Approved Conservation Plan including a description of materials and finishes, to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

iv.        Provided a Lighting Plan that describes how 26 Lombard Street will be sensitively illuminated to enhance its heritage character, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

v.         Provided an Interpretation Plan for 26 Lombard Street, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, and thereafter shall implement such Plan to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

vi.        Provided a Letter of Credit, including provision for upward indexing, in a form and amount and from a bank satisfactory to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, to secure all work included in the Approved Conservation Plan required in Part 1.b.ii. in the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning,  the approved Lighting Plan required in Part 1.d.iv. in the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, and the approved Interpretation Plan required in Part 1.d.v. in the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning.

 

e.         Notwithstanding the requirements of Parts 1.d.ii. and 1.d.iii. above and in addition to the requirements of Parts 1.d. i, and iv. to vi. above prior to the issuance of any permit for:

 

i.          Shoring, excavation and/or foundation work acceptable to the  Manager, Heritage Preservation Services for the property at 26  Lombard Street (together the “Foundation Works”), including a heritage permit or a building permit, but excluding permits for repairs and maintenance and usual and minor works acceptable to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services, for the existing heritage building at 26 Lombard Street and other usual and minor works acceptable to the Manager, Heritage Preservation Service:

 

A.        The owner shall have entered into and registered the related site plan agreement for the Alterations to allow for the construction of a maximum 45-storey, and up to the specified heights in metres shown on Map 2 to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment provided at the January 13, 2015 Toronto and East York Community Council Meeting, residential development with retail at grade, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

B.        The owner shall have provided full building permit drawings for such Foundation Works, including notes and specifications for the conservation and protective measures keyed to the Approved Conservation Plan,  to be prepared by the project architect and a qualified heritage consultant, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

f.          That prior to the release of the Letter of Credit required in Part 1.d.iv. in the report (January 27, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, the owner shall:

 

i.            Provide a letter of substantial completion prepared and signed by a qualified heritage consultant confirming that the required conservation work and the required interpretive work have been completed in accordance with the Approved Conservation Plan, the approved Lighting Plan, and the approved Interpretation Plan, and that an appropriate standard of conservation has been maintained, all to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

 

ii.           Provide replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services.

Origin

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning

Summary

This report recommends that City Council revise its decision of August 25, 26, 27, and 28, 2014 to allow for the phased issuance of permits and that City Council amend former City of Toronto By-law No. 531-82 designating the properties at 26 Lombard Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act to revise the Reasons for Designation in accordance with the 2005 changes to the Ontario Heritage Act. The site contains two late 19th century former industrial buildings known historically as the R. G. McLean Company Building (1890) and the Barclay, Clark and Company Building (1894) that were recognized on the first City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties in 1973 and designated under the Ontario Heritage Act in 1982.  The amending of the designating by-law will ensure that all of the cultural heritage values and attributes of the properties at 26 Lombard Street are protected. 

 

City Council has approved alterations to the heritage property at 26 Lombard Street as part of a development application for a 45-storey residential condominium that will retain the heritage buildings and authorized a heritage easement agreement with the property owner.  Since Council's approval the applicant has requested changes to the timing of certain heritage requirements to allow for the phased issuance of permits for the development.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning - Amendment of Designating By-law and Revised Approval Conditions for Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75718.pdf
Attachment 1 - Amendment of Designating By-law and Revised Approval Conditions for Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75719.pdf
Attachment 2 - Amendment of Designating By-law and Revised Approval Conditions for Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75720.pdf
Attachment 3 - Amendment of Designating By-law and Revised Approval Conditions for Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75721.pdf
Attachment 4 - Amendment of Designating By-law and Revised Approval Conditions for Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75722.pdf
Attachment 5 - Amendment of Designating By-law and Revised Approval Conditions for Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75723.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(February 23, 2015) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Amendment of Designating By-law and Revised Approval Conditions for Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property - 26 Lombard Street (TE4.19a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78250.pdf

TE4.27 - Application to Remove a Private Tree - 582 Hillsdale Avenue East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council deny the request for a permit to remove a privately owned horse chestnut tree located in the rear yard of 582 Hillsdale Avenue East.

Origin

(January 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation

Summary

This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately owned tree located at 582 Hillsdale Avenue East. The application indicates the reason for removal is the tree's poor condition.  

 

The subject tree is a horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) with a diameter of 54 cm measured at 1.4 metres above ground. The subject tree is in good condition, both structurally and botanically.  Urban Forestry does not support removal.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 19, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Forestry, Parks, Forestry and Recreation - 582 Hillsdale Avenue East - Application to Remove a Private Tree
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-74950.pdf

TE4.33 - Assumption of Services, Ambercroft Subdivision, Phase 2 and 3, Registered Plan 66M-2414 and Parts 7 and 14 of Plan 66R-24294

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
32 - Beaches-East York

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council assume the services installed within Phases 2 and 3 of the Ambercroft Subdivision and that the City formally assume the roads within the Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2414 and on Parts 7 and 14 of Plan 66R-24294.

 

2.         City Council authorize the Director, Engineering Review, to release the performance guarantee held with respect to the municipal services in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement.

 

3.         City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highways and municipal services within the Registered Subdivision Plan 66M-2414 and Parts 7 and 14 of Plan 66R-24294.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.

 

5.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within the Plan of Subdivision 66M-2414 and Parts 7 and 14 of Plan 66R-24294 to Toronto Hydro.

 

6.         City Council authorize the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto.

Origin

(January 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Engineering Review

Summary

This report requests Council's authority for the City to assume the municipal roads and services within Phases 2 and 3 of the Ambercroft Subdivision, in accordance with the terms of the Subdivision Agreement for Plan 66M-2414 and Parts 7 and 14 of Plan 66R-24294, dated December 7, 2004, between Ambercroft Construction Ltd. and the City of Toronto.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Engineering Review - Assumption of Services, Ambercroft Subdivision, Phase 2 and 3 Registered Plan 66M-2414 and Parts 7 and 14 of Plan 66R-24294
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-74980.pdf

TE4.44 - Construction Staging Area - 1220 Dundas Street East

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the closure of the sidewalk on the north side of Dundas Street East, between a point 70.4 metres east of Carlaw Avenue and a point 125.2 metres east of Carlaw Avenue, from February 11, 2015 to December 31, 2015.

 

2.         City Council direct that Dundas Street East be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.

 

3.         City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board, which must be prominently placed and legible from 20 metres and on all elevations from the construction site.

 

4.         City Council direct the applicant to provide and install public art, including mural artwork, onto every elevation of the hoarding board with adequate spotlighting for night-time illumination, at their sole cost, to the satisfaction of the Ward Councillor.

Origin

(December 4, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Streetcar Developments is constructing a 7-storey condominium at No. 1220 Dundas Street East.  They need to close the sidewalk and a bicycle lane on the north side of Dundas Street East and establish a temporary pedestrian walkway in the bicycle lane in order to do their work.

Background Information (Community Council)

(December 4, 2014) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Construction Staging Area - 1220 Dundas Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-74814.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1602 - Construction Staging Area - 1220 Dundas Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-74815.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(December 19, 2014) E-mail from Laurence Lui (TE.Main.TE4.44.1)
(January 11, 2015) E-mail from Sylvia Slaughter (TE.Main.TE4.44.2)
(January 12, 2015) E-mail from Michael Holloway (TE.Main.TE4.44.3)

TE4.46 - Accessible Loading Zone - Springhurst Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
14 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
Bill 354 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council enact a designated accessible on-street loading zone, operating from 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the north side of Springhurst Avenue, between a point 40.8 metres west of Cowan Avenue and a point 8.0 metres further west.

Origin

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is seeking authority from City Council to establish an accessible loading zone on Springhurst Avenue.  The loading zone will operate between the hours of 6:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., Monday to Friday and will provide curb-side access for a resident on this street.  This designation will partially affect overnight permit parking spaces.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 26, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Accessible Loading Zone - Springhurst Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75203.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-1660 - Accessible Loading Zone - Springhurst Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75204.pdf

TE4.51 - Removal of On-Street Accessible Parking Space - February 2015 (Non-Delegated)

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
30 - Toronto-Danforth
Attention
Bill 355 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council approve the removal of the on-street accessible parking space at the location identified in Appendix A attached to the report (January 23, 2015) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.

Origin

(January 23, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

The purpose of this report is to obtain approval for the removal of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.

 

As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject streets, City Council approval of this report is required.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 23, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Removal of On-Street Accessible Parking Space - February 2015 (Non-Delegated)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75067.pdf

TE4.52 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
20 - Trinity-Spadina, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
Bill 381 has been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council rescind the traffic regulations outlined in Appendix "A", attached to the report (January 23, 2015) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, entitled "Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations and Bay Street Road Alteration".

 

2.         City Council approve the traffic regulations and traffic control signals outlined in Appendix "B", attached to the report (January 23, 2015) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, entitled "Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations and Bay Street Road Alteration".

 

3.         City Council approve the widening of the west side of Bay Street, between Queens Quay West and a point 73.6 metres north, generally as shown on Drawing No. 421G-1671, dated January 2015, attached to the report (January 23, 2015) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, entitled "Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations and Bay Street Road Alteration".

Origin

(January 23, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District

Summary

Transportation Services is requesting City Council approval to enact various turn prohibitions, parking regulations and also a 40 km/h speed limit on Queens Quay West, between Yo Yo Ma Lane and Yonge Street, in advance of the opening of the reconfigured roadway in May 2015.

 

Approval is also requested to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Queens Quay West and Robertson Crescent (east); the driveway to HTO Park (east); the driveway to No. 207 Queens Quay West (Terminal Access); and the crossover where the TTC tracks switch from the middle of Queens Quay West to the south side of the road, between Spadina Avenue and Yo Yo Ma Lane. The signals are needed to facilitate safe access across the TTC streetcar tracks.

 

We are also requesting approval to widen Bay Street on the west side by 1.1 metres, between Queens Quay West and a point 73.6 metres north, in order to accommodate the implementation of bus parking and previously approved bicycle lanes.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 23, 2015) Report from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75648.pdf
Appendix A - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75649.pdf
Appendix B - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75650.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1636 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75729.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1661 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75730.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1662 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75731.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1663 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75732.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1664 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75733.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1665 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75734.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1666 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75735.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1667 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75737.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1668 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75738.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1669 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75739.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1670 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75740.pdf
Drawing No.421G-1671 - Queens Quay West Traffic Regulations, Traffic Control Signals and Bay Street Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75741.pdf

TE4.57 - Operation of the 2015 to 2017 Honda Indy Toronto Race at Exhibition Place

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that, in order to authorize the 2015, 2016 and 2017 Honda Indy Toronto events, and conduct the 2015 race, that:

 

1.         City Council grant authority to enter into a new three-year agreement with Green Savoree Toronto ULC, to permit the holding of the Honda Indy Toronto events in the years 2015, 2016 and 2017 on terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager of Transportation Services, in such form as required by the City Solicitor, and in consideration of the unique nature and requirements of the event and the financial.

 

2.         City Council amend Chapter 937-3.1, Temporary Closing of Highways, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, subject to the execution of the required agreement with Green Savoree Toronto ULC, to delegate authority to the General Manager of Transportation Services to temporarily close to vehicular and pedestrian traffic any highway or portion of a highway for such periods as required for the purposes of the Honda Indy Toronto race in 2015, 2016 and 2017.

 

3.         City Council establish a taxi cab stand in the eastbound curb lane of Lake Shore Boulevard West, from 30 metres east of Strachan Avenue to 30 metres west of Fort York Boulevard, during the Honda Indy Toronto race from June 11 to 14, 2015, inclusive, and extended to include June 15, 2015, if necessary, and also during the Honda Indy Toronto race in each of 2016 and 2017, such specific dates to be determined by the General Manager of Transportation Services.

 

4.         City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect thereto, including the introduction in Council of any Bills that may be required. 

Origin

(January 26, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services

Summary

This report seeks Council authority to enter into a three year agreement with Green Savoree Toronto ULC for 2015-2017 and to amend certain traffic regulations and Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways, of the Municipal Code to enable the running of the Honda Indy Toronto race at Exhibition Place on June 11, 12, 13 and 14, 2015, July  14, 15, 16 and 17, 2016 and  July 13, 14, 15, and 16, 2017, subject to the event satisfying all regulatory and contractual requirements in each year of the race.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 26, 2015) Report from the General Manager, Transportation Services - Operation of the 2015 to 2017 Honda Indy Toronto Race at Exhibition Place
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75309.pdf

TE4.65 - Make a Wish Foundation of Canada Rappelling Event at City Hall

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant permission to Make a Wish Canada's request to rappel from the East Tower Roof onto the Podium Green Roof of City Hall.

 

2.         City Council grant permission to the Facilities Management Division to enter into a Memo of Understanding with Make a Wish Foundation of Canada.

 

3.         City Council require that the Make a Wish Foundation of Canada compensate the City of Toronto through the Facilities Management Division for all the City of Toronto costs associated with the event.

Origin

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

It is recommended that Toronto and East York Community Council give exemption to Make a Wish Foundation of Canada's request to rappel from the East Tower Roof onto the Podium Green Roof of City Hall and grant permission to Facilities Management Division to enter into a Memo of Understanding with Make a Wish Foundation of Canada.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer - Make a Wish Foundation of Canada Rappelling Event at City Hall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75724.pdf

TE4.66 - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events up to July 1, 2015

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council grant an exemption to the Community Folk Art Council of Toronto, CAAMA, Ontario Farm Fresh Marketing Association and Toronto Downtown Jazz Society to operate a beer garden and to serve wine and hard liquor contingent upon the following conditions:

 

a.         approval of the A.G.C.O.;

 

b.         approval of the Medical Officer of Health;

 

c.         compliance with the City of Toronto’s Municipal Alcohol Policy;

 

d.         receipt of all the necessary permits associated with the production of the event i.e., building permit, noise by-law extension permit.

 

2.         City Council grant permission to CAAMA, Trek for Teens Foundation, Schizophrenia Society of Ontario, Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Toronto, Camp Jumoke, United Way and Toronto Downtown Jazz Society to solicit donations in support of their organizations.

 

3.         City Council grant permission to Toronto Downtown Jazz Society to host “ticketed" performances and to solicit donations in support of their organization.

 

4.         City Council require that the various events compensate the City of Toronto through the Facilities Management Division for all the City of Toronto costs associated with these events.

Origin

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer

Summary

It is recommended that Toronto and East York Community Council give exemption to Trek for Teens Foundation's "Trek for Teens", Schizophrenia Society of Ontario’s “Walk for Schizophrenia”, Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Toronto's "Boys and Girls Clubs – Capital One Race for Kids", Camp Jumoke’s “Camp Jumoke Walk” and the United Way's Scotia Bank Rat Race request to solicit donations, Toronto Downtown Jazz Society’s “TD Canada Trust Downtown Jazz Festival” request to operate a beer/wine garden, host a ticketed event and to solicit donations and the  CAAMA's "Canadian Music Week" to solicit for donations and operate a beer/wine garden, Community Folk Art Council of Toronto's "Thank you Canada, Dutch Liberation Festival" and Ontario Farm Fresh Marketing Association "Farmers Market" request to operate a beer/wine garden to be held on Nathan Phillips Square.

Background Information (Community Council)

(January 27, 2015) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer - Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events up to July 1, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-75725.pdf

TE4.67 - Endorsement of Events for Liquor Licensing Purposes

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Attention
Communications TE4.67.28 to TE4.67.34 have been submitted on this Item.

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

A.        City Council advise the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that it has no objection, for liquor licensing purposes, to the following requests, noting that applicants are required to comply with other applicable By-laws and to obtain the necessary permits for any patio area extending into the City's right of way:

 

1.         Temporary patio/liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. and beer gardens on the following dates during the 22nd Annual Krinos Taste of the Danforth, to be held on Danforth Avenue, between Broadview and Jones Avenues, and noting that a list of participating venues will be submitted at a later date:

 

Friday, August 7, 2015 from 5:00 p.m. to Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 4:00 a.m.;
Saturday, August 8, 2015 from 12:00 p.m. to Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 4:00 a.m.; and
Sunday, August 9, 2015 from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

 

2.         Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions during 2015 Community Festival "Dundas West Fest" event to be held on June 6, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Dundas Street West, between Lansdowne Avenue and Ossington Avenue, for the following establishments:

 

Branca, 1729 Dundas Street West
Kingsview, 1675 Dundas Street West
Wallflower, 1665 Dundas Street West
Bota Fogo, 1631 Dundas Street West
Bola Bar, 1608 Dundas Street West
Half Point, 1602 Dundas Street West
Bivy, 1600 Dundas Street West
CAFÉ+BAR+PASTA, 1588 Dundas Street West
Rock Bottom, 1576 Dundas Street West
Black Dice, 1574 Dundas Street West
Amigos da Dundas, 1570 Dundas Street West
Brazil Bakery, 1566 Dundas Street West
Bairrada, 1560 Dundas Street West
Pho Phuong, 1603 Dundas Street West
Atlantic on Dundas, 1597 Dundas Street West
Four Aces, 1595 Dundas Street West
Lula Lounge, 1585 Dundas Street West
Henhouse, 1532 Dundas Street West
The Derby, 1516 Dundas Street West
The Hogtown Cure, 1484 Dundas Street West
Brockton Bar & Sports, 1543 Dundas Street West
Four Stars, 1485 Dundas Street West
Lucy Brock, 1479 Dundas Street West
This End Up, 1454 Dundas Street West
Sukho Thai, 1442 Dundas Street West
The Federal, 1438 Dundas Street West
Midfield, 1436 Dundas Street West
Unlovable , 1415 Dundas Street West
Europa Banquet Hall, 1407 Dundas Street West
Novo Horizonte, 1430 Dundas Street West
Gayley's, 1424 Dundas Street West
Eggs Sunrise, 1422 Dundas Street West
E L Ruddy, 1371 Dundas Street West
Sex Laser, 1369 Dundas Street West
Cafe Regional Bar & Grill, 1330 Dundas Street West
Enoteca Sociale, 1288 Dundas Street West
Essen, 1282 Dundas Street West
The Dock Ellis, 1280 Dundas Street West
Goleard's Sports Bar, 1276 Dundas Street West
Nossa Casa Sports Café, 1331 Dundas Street West
Porter House, 1321 Dundas Street West
Universal Billiards, 1307 Dundas Street West
Remix Lounge, 1305 Dundas Street West
Bambi's, 1265 Dundas Street West
Mr. Flamingo, 1265 Dundas Street West
Fountain, 1261 Dundas Street West
Junked Food Co., 1256 Dundas Street West
Milk Glass, 1247 Dundas Street West
Brazilian Star, 1242 Dundas Street West
V.Ita, 1214 Dundas Street West
Churchill, 1212 Dundas Street West
Nova Era Bakery, 1172 Dundas Street West
The Contender, 1166 Dundas Street West
The Ossington Stop, 1164 Dundas Street West
Caldense Bakery, 1209 Dundas Street West
The Garrison, 1197 Dundas Street West
The Red Light, 1185 Dundas Street West
Get Well, 1181 Dundas Street West
Camp 4, 1173 Dundas Street West
Communist's Daughter, 1149 Dundas Street West

 

3.         Temporary liquor licence/patio extensions during the Bloorcourt Arts and Crafts Fair 2015 on September 13, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. to be held on Bloor Street West from Dufferin Street to Montrose Avenue, for the following establishments:

 

African Palace Restaurant, 977 Bloor Street West
Atlantis Restaurant, 1005 Bloor Street West
Bad Dog Theatre, 875 Bloor Street West
Bassline, 865 Bloor Street West
Black Horse Pub and Grill, 928 Bloor Street West
Bloomer’s Bakery, 873 Bloor Street West
Bloor Bar Café, 1050 Bloor Street West
Christie Pits Pub, 814 Bloor Street West
Civil Liberties, 878 Bloor Street West
Comedy Bar, 945 Bloor Street West
Courense Bakery, 1014 Bloor Street West
Disgraceland, 965 Bloor Street West
Drift Bar, 1063 Bloor Street West
El Cafecito, 3 Westmoreland Avenue
Hogtown Vegan, 1056 Bloor Street West
Hurricanes, 963 Bloor Street West
Jankie's Place, 985 Bloor Street West
Lalibela Restaurant, 869 Bloor Street West
Menalon Restaurant, 841 Bloor Street West
Mexitaco Restaurant, 828 Bloor Street West
Monica's Bar and Grill, 881 Bloor Street West
Nazareth Restaurant, 969 Bloor Street West
Northwood Café, 815 Bloor Street West
Ten26 Bar, 1026 Bloor Street West
O Petisco Portuges, 1069 Bloor Street West
Pero Restaurant, 812 Bloor Street West
Ponta Delgada, 990 Bloor Street West
Roma1090, 1090 Bloor Street West
Saving Gigi, 859 Bloor Street West
Sheesha Lounge, 901 Bloor Street West
Tall Boys, 838 Bloor Street West
Thai Green Chili, 1059 Bloor Street West
Thai Room (Friendly Thai), 810 Bloor Street West
The Piston, 937 Bloor Street West
The Steady Cafe, 1051 Bloor Street West
Tokyo Sushi, 1049 Bloor Street West
Two Bite Saloon, 840 Bloor Street West
Wisebar, 1007 Bloor Street West
Zemen Sport Bar & Café, 842 Bloor Street West

 

4.         Temporary patio extensions during The Toronto Fringe Festival to be held from July 1 to July 12, 2015 for The Factory Theatre, 125 Bathurst Street and The Tarragon Theatre, 30 Bridgman Avenue (dates and times to be determined by the venues); and a temporary liquor licence extension for the parking lot area behind Honest Ed's, 581 Bloor Street West, as follows:

 

July 1 to July 3, 2015 – 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.
July 4 and 5, 2015 – 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.
July 6 to July 10, 2015 – 4:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.
July 11 and 12, 2015 – 1:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.

 

5.         Temporary liquor licence extensions, and beer tents/gardens for the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto 2015 including the following, but not limited to, events to be held on various dates and locations from July 7, 2015, to October 4, 2015:

 

a.         Official Launch
Tuesday, July 7, 2015,  11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and
5.00 p.m. to 9.00p.m.
David Pecaut Square, Metro Hall

 

b.         Canada Rugby League Competition
Thursday, July, 18, 2015 
Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto


c.         Caribbean Pavilion (Pan Am Games)

July 24 to 31, 2015 – 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m.

Lamport Stadium inside and car park

 

d.         Organization of Calypso Performing Artiste
Saturday, July 25th, 11:00 a.m. to 11:00p.m.
PC HO Cultural Centre, 5183 Sheppard Avenue East, Scarborough (Item SC4.23)

 

e.         King and Queen Extravaganza Show
Thursday, July 30, 2015 – 3:00p.m. to 2:00 a.m. Friday July 31, 2015
Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

f.          Ontario Steel Pan Competition Pan Alive
July 31, 2015,  3:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., Saturday, August 1, 2015
Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

g.          Scotiabank Toronto Caribbean Grand Parade
Saturday, August 1, 2015, 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Marilyn Bell Parkway, Band Shell, Tennis Courts, Exhibition Place, and Lots 2 and 3, CNE Grounds and Coronation Park

 

h.         Carnival Island
Sunday, August 2, 2015, 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
Olympic Island

 

i.          Canada Rugby League
Saturday, August 22, 2015
Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

j.          Canada Rugby League Competition
Saturday, September 19, 2015
Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

k.         Canada Rugby League Competition
Saturday, September 26, 2015
Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

l.          Canada Rugby League Competition
Wednesday, September 30, 2015
Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

m.        Canada Rugby League Competition
Sunday, October 4, 2015
Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

6.         Temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m., for the following venues during the 29th Annual Toronto Jazz Festival, to be held from June 18 to June 27, 2015:

 

Jazz Bistro
The Painted Lady
Two other Festival venues to be determined.

 

7.         Temporary patio extensions until 12:00 midnight for the following establishments during the Beaches Jazz StreetFest (Beaches Jazz Festival) to be held on Thursday, July 23, 2015, Friday, July 24, 2015, and Saturday, July 25, 2015:

 

Beacher Café, 2162 Queen Street East
Breakwall Restaurant, 1910 Queen Street East
Castro’s Lounge, 2116 Queen Street East
Gabby’s, 2076 Queen Street East
Gull and Firkin, 2298 Queen Street East
Honey Bistro, 2232 Queen Street East
Il Fornello, 2024 Queen Street East
Stone Lion, 1958 Queen Street East
Outrigger Tap & Table, 2232 Queen Street East
Salty Dog, 1980 Queen Street East
St. Louis Bar & Grill, 1963 Queen Street East
Whitlock’s, 1961 Queen Street East

 

8.         Temporary extensions for a number of licensed restaurants operating during the CNE HorseCapades from August 2 to 20, 2015, 2015 Canadian National Exhibition from August 21 to September 7, 2015,  and the Canadian International Air Show from September 4 to 7, 2015, as well as an extended Casino Licence to include the time period from the beginning of the CNE HorseCapades Show until Labour Day.

 

B.        Submitted to Council without recommendation the request for a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. for the following Soundtrack of the City event:

 

April 30-May 3, 2015 (4:00 a.m. on May 4, 2015):

Rancho Relaxo, 300 College Street

 

C.      1.          A partial closure of a section of Frederick Street, on the south east corner of King Street East and Frederick Street for the service of food and beer during The Chef Events Kitchen and George Brown College Chefs' House event to be held on May 28, 2015 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at the Chef's House Restaurant, 215 King Street East.

 

            2.          Road closure on Danforth Avenue, between Broadview and Jones Avenues during the 22nd Annual Krinos Taste of the Danforth to be held from August 7 to 9, 2015.

 

            3.          Road closure on Dundas Street West, between Lansdowne Avenue and Ossington Avenue during the 2015 Community Festival "Dundas West Fest" event to be held on June 6, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.

 

4.         Street closure on Bloor Street West from Dufferin Street to Montrose Avenue from 7:00 a.m. on September 13, 2015 to 1:00 a.m. on September 14, 2015, during the Bloorcourt Arts and Crafts Fair 2015.

 

5.         Road closure from the west to east side of the Bloor-Viaduct Bridge during The Danforth Business Improvement Area's 6th Annual Thrill of the Grill BBQ fundraiser to be held on July 4, 2015, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.

 

6.         Road closure on Roncesvalles Avenue from just north of Queen Street West to Dundas Street West, during the 10th Annual Roncesvalles Polish Festival to be held on Saturday, September 19, 2015 from 6:00 a.m. until 11:00 p.m. on Sunday, September 20, 2015, with an additional road closure from 12:00 noon on September 18, 2015 on Wright Avenue, just west of Roncesvalles Avenue for stage set up.

 

7.         Road closure on Parliament Street between Wellesley and Gerrard Streets, and Carlton Street from Parliament Street west to Ontario Street, during the Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts event to take place from September 11-13, 2015.

Community Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Toronto and East York Community Council:

 

A.        Under its delegated authority, declared the following to be events of municipal significance for liquor licensing purposes:

 

1.         The Chef Events Kitchen and George Brown College Chefs' House event to be held on May 28, 2015 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at the Chef's House Restaurant, 215 King Street East, and on a section of Frederick Street, on the south east corner of King Street East and Frederick Street for the service of food and beer during this event.

 

2.         The Toronto Food Truck Festival event to be held on August 1 and 2, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., at Woodbine Park.

 

3.         MUD HERO TORONTO URBAN event to be held on May 22, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and on May 23, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Ontario Place, 995 Lake Shore Boulevard West.

 

4.         Holy Spirit Festival and Our Lady of Angels event to be held on June 27, 2015, from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. and June 28, 2015, from 2:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at Santa Cruz Church, 142 Argyle Street.

 

5.         "Yum Cha 2015" event, to be held on February 21, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Artscape Daniels' Spectrum.

 

6.         Opening reception for the second issue of Pamphlet by the Autumn Gallery + Retail Space to be held on February 19, 2015, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., at Autumn Gallery + Retail Space, 478 Roncesvalles Avenue.

 

7.         Soundtrack of Queen Street event, to be held from March 19-22, 2015, at the Bovine Sex Club, Cherry Cola's, The Hideout, The Horseshoe Tavern and the Velvet Underground. (Note: Temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. approved by City Council on February 10 and 11, 2015 under TE3.90.)

 

8.         22nd Annual Krinos Taste of the Danforth to be held on the following dates on Danforth Avenue, between Broadview and Jones Avenues:

 

Friday, August 7, 2015 from 5:00 p.m. to Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 4:00 a.m.;

Saturday, August 8, 2015 from 12:00 p.m. to Sunday, August 9, 2015 at 4:00 a.m.; and

Sunday, August 9, 2015 from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.

 

9.         2015 Community Festival "Dundas West Fest" event to be held on June 6, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., on Dundas Street West, between Lansdowne Avenue and Ossington Avenue.

 

10.        Bloorcourt Arts and Crafts Fair 2015 on September 13, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. to be held on Bloor Street West from Dufferin Street to Montrose Avenue.

 

11.       The Fringe of Toronto Theatre Festival to be held from July 1 to July 12, 2015.

 

12.       The Danforth Business Improvement Area's 6th Annual Thrill of the Grill BBQ fundraiser to be held on July 4, 2015, on the Bloor-Viaduct Bridge, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., with beer/wine sampling areas.

 

13.       The Eco-Art-Fest to be held from June 19, 2015 to September 13, 2015, on the upper lawn at the Todmorden Mills heritage site, 67 Pottery Road from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. (with possible extensions to 11:00 p.m.) on Fridays and Saturdays and 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (with possible extensions to 8:00 p.m.) on Sundays.

 

14.       Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto 2015 including the following, but not limited to, events to be held on various dates and locations from July 7, 2015, to October 4, 2015:

 

a.         Official Launch

Tuesday, July 7, 2015, 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. and

5.00 p.m. to 9.00 p.m.

David Pecaut Square, Metro Hall

 

b.         Canada Rugby League Competition

Thursday, July, 18, 2015

Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

c.         Caribbean Pavilion (Pan Am Games)

July 24 to 31, 2015 – 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m.

Lamport Stadium inside and car park

 

d.         Organization of Calypso Performing Artiste

Saturday, July 25, 2015, 11:00 a.m.  to 11:00 p.m.

PC HO Cultural Center, 5183 Sheppard Avenue East, Scarborough (Item SC4.23)

 

e.         King and Queen Extravaganza Show

Thursday, July 30, 2015 - 3:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. on Friday July 31, 2015

Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

f.          Ontario Steel Pan Competition Pan Alive

July 31, 2015,  3:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., on Saturday, August 1, 2015

Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

g.         Scotiabank Toronto Caribbean Grand Parade

Saturday, August 1, 2015, 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Marilyn Bell Parkway, Band Shell, Tennis Courts, Exhibition Place, and Lots 2 and 3, CNE Grounds and Coronation Park

 

h.         Carnival Island

Sunday, August 2, 2015, 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.

Olympic Island

 

i.          Canada Rugby League

Saturday,  August 22, 2015

Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

j.          Canada Rugby League Competition

Saturday, September 19, 2015

Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

k.         Canada Rugby League Competition

Saturday, September 26, 2015

Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

l.          Canada Rugby League Competition

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

m.        Canada Rugby League Competition

Sunday, October 4, 2015

Lamport Stadium, 1151 King Street West, Toronto

 

15.       St. John Catholic School CSAC Fundraising event to be held on February 28, 2015, at Ted Reeve Arena, 175 Main Street, from 7:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.

 

16.       29th Annual Toronto Jazz Festival, to be held from June 18 to June 27, 2015, at various locations in the City.

 

17.       2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games "Toronto Attractions Council 2015 Attractions Marketplace" event to be held on April 9, 2015, from 4:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., at The Great Hall inside Union Station, 65 Front Street West.

 

18.       Pre-festival Polka Party to be held on September 18, 2015 (St. Casimir's Hall, 156 Roncesvalles Avenue) from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., and the 10th Annual Roncesvalles Polish Festival on September 19, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. until 12:00 a.m., and September 20, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., on Roncesvalles Avenue from just north of Queen Street West to Dundas Street West.

 

19.       OCAD University 4th Year Thesis-Designated Students' Series of Art Exhibitions to be held on the following dates at Gallery 1313 - 1313 Queen Street West, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.:

 

Thursday, March 5, 2015

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Thursday, April 2, 2015

 

20.       "Curry Fest" to be held on Sunday, March 22, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at the 2nd Floor Events Space at 461 King Street West.

 

21.       The following events by The Society of Beer Drinking Ladies from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. each event:

 

Bevy 0013 on February 27, 2015 at Jam Factory, 2 Matilda Street;

Bevy 0014 on March 27, 2015 at Propeller Coffee Co., 50 Wade Avenue;

Bevy 0015 on April 24, 2015 at Indie Ale House's Barrel House, 165 Geary Avenue; and

Bevy 0016 on May 29, 2015 at Junction City Music Hall, 2907 Dundas Street West.

 

22.       The Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts to be held on Parliament Street, between Gerrard and Wellesley, and Carlton Street, between Parliament and Sherbourne, from September 11-13, 2015 from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m. daily.

 

23.       The following Beaches Festival Committee events:

 

The Beaches Canada Day Festival at Woodbine Park on July 1, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.;

 

Afrofest at Woodbine Park on July 4 and 5, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m.; and

 

The Beaches Jazz Festival at Woodbine Park from July 10-26, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. daily.

 

24.       CNE HorseCapades from August 2 to 20, 2015, 2015 Canadian National Exhibition from August 21 to September 7, 2015, and the Canadian International Air Show from September 4 to 7, 2015.

 

B.        Deferred consideration of the following letters:

 

1.         (February 10, 2015) from Jeanne Reid, Music City North (TE4.67.15) respecting various Soundtrack of the City events until its next meeting to be held on April 14, 2015, with the exception of the request for a temporary liquor licence extension until 4:00 a.m. for the Soundtrack of the City event to be held from April 30-May 3, 2015 at the Rancho Relaxo, which was submitted to Council without recommendation.

 

2.         (February 11, 2015) from Les Murray, respecting the Toronto's Festival of Beer's 2015 Spring Sessions event to be held from April 24-26, 2015 (Item TE4.67.19) until its next meeting to be held on April 14, 2015.

Summary

Seeking endorsement of events for Liquor Licensing Purposes.

Communications (Community Council)

(December 10, 2014) Letter from Les Murray, on behalf of Jodi Sellers, Chef Events Kitchen, requesting that The Chef Events Kitchen and George Brown College Chefs' House event to be held on May 28, 2015 from 3:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. at the Chef's House Restaurant, 215 King Street East, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting a partial closure of a section of Frederick Street, on the south east corner of King Street East and Frederick Street for the service of food and beer during this event. (TE.Main.TE4.67.1)
(January 12, 2015) Letter from Ben Freeman, Executive Director, The Toronto Food Truck Festival, requesting that The Toronto Food Truck Festival event to be held on August 1 and 2, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., at Woodbine Park, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE4.67.2)
(January 13, 2015) Letter from Ashley Spizziri, Catering and Event Manager, requesting that the MUD HERO TORONTO URBAN event to be held on May 22, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 a.m. and on May 23, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. at Ontario Place, 995 Lake Shore Boulevard West, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE4.67.3)
(January 22, 2015) Letter from Louis Silva, Santa Cruz Church, requesting that the Holy Spirit Festival and Our Lady of Angels event to be held on June 27, 2015, from 4:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. and June 28, 2015, from 2:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m., at Santa Cruz Church, 142 Argyle Street, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE4.67.4)
(January 15, 2015) Letter from Frank Kocis, Spotlight City Events Inc., requesting that the "Yum Cha 2015" event, to be held on February 21, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at Artscape Daniels' Spectrum, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE4.67.5)
(January 20, 2015) Letter from Alessandro Trimarchi, on behalf of Autumn Gallery + Retail Space, requesting that the opening reception for the second issue of Pamphlet to be held on February 19, 2015, from 7:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., at Autumn Gallery + Retail Space, 478 Roncesvalles Avenue, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE4.67.6)
(January 15, 2015) E-mail from Jeannie Reid requesting that the Soundtrack of Queen Street event, to be held from March 19-22, 2015, until 4:00 a.m. each day, at the Bovine Sex Club, Cherry Cola's, The Hideout, The Horseshoe Tavern (4:00 a.m. on March 20, 2015 only) and Velvet Underground, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Main.TE4.67.7)
(January 26, 2015) Letter from Katerina Gourmos, GreekTown on the Danforth BIA, requesting that the 22nd Annual Krinos Taste of the Danforth to be held from August 7 to 9, 2015, on Danforth Avenue, between Broadview and Jones Avenues, be declared an event of municipal significance; requesting approval of beer gardens, patio extensions, and liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. on August 7 and 8, 2015, and until 10:00 p.m. on August 9, 2015; and noting that a list of participating venues will be submitted at a later date. (TE.Main.TE4.67.8)
(January 21, 2015) Letter from Lubo Brezina, Chair, Dundas West BIA, and Anabela Taborda, Chair, Little Portugal BIA, requesting that the 2015 Community Festival "Dundas West Fest" event to be held on June 6, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance; requesting approval of liquor license extensions for the establishments listed in the attachment to the letter; and further requesting approval of a road closure along Dundas Street West, between Lansdowne Avenue and Ossington Avenue. (TE.Main.TE4.67.9)
(January 30, 2015) E-mail from Simone Weir, Bloorcourt BIA, requesting that the Bloorcourt Arts and Crafts Fair 2015 on September 13, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. be declared as an event of municipal significance; requesting non-objection for temporary liquor licence/patio extensions for various establishments; and approval of a street closure on Bloor Street West from Dufferin Street to Montrose Avenue from 7:00 a.m. on September 13, 2015 to 1:00 a.m. on September 14, 2015. (TE.Main.TE4.67.10)
(February 3, 2015) Letter from Lucy Eveleigh, General Manager, requesting that The Fringe of Toronto Theatre Festival to be held from July 1-July 12, 2015 be declared an event of municipal significance; requesting approval of temporary patio extensions at The Factory Theatre, 125 Bathurst Street and The Tarragon Theatre, 30 Bridgeman Avenue (dates and times to be determined by the venues); and a temporary liquor licence extension for the parking lot area behind Honest Ed's, 581 Bloor Street West for the dates/times outlined. (TE.Main.TE4.67.11)
(February 5, 2015) Letter from Susan Puff, Executive Director, The Danforth Business Improvement Area, requesting that the 6th Annual Thrill of the Grill BBQ fundraiser to be held on July 4, 2015, from 6:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., with beer/wine sampling areas, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of a road closure from the west to east side of the Bloor-Viaduct Bridge. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.12)
(February 9, 2015) Letter from Cara Said, No. 9: Contemporary Art and The Environment. requesting that the Eco-Art-Fest to be held from June 19, 2015 to September 13, 2015, at the Todmorden Mills heritage site, 67 Pottery Road from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. (with possible extensions to 11:00 p.m.) on Fridays and Saturdays and 12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (with possible extensions to 8:00 p.m.) on Sundays, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.13)
(February 5, 2015) Letter from Councillor Joe Mihevc requesting that the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto 2015 events to be held on various dates and locations from July 7, 2015, to October 4, 2015, as outlined in the letter from Councillor Mihevc, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence extensions, and beer tents/gardens for these events. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/comm/communicationfile-51093.pdf
(February 10, 2015) E-mail from Jeannie Reid, Music City North, requesting that a number of Soundtrack of the City events to be held on a number of weekends throughout 2015, from 9:00 p.m. to 4:00 a.m., at various venues, as listed in the letter from Ms. Reid, be declared events of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for these events. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.15)
(February 10, 2015) E-mail from Angela Visconti requesting that St. John Catholic School CSAC Fundraising event to be held on February 28, 2015, at Ted Reeve Arena, 175 Main Street, from 7:30 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.16)
(February 5, 2015) Letter from Patti Marshall, TD Toronto Jazz Festival, requesting that the 29th Annual Toronto Jazz Festival, to be held from June 18 to June 27, 2015, at various locations in the City, be declared an event of municipal significance; and requesting liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the Jazz Bistro, The Painted Lady, and two other Festival venues to be determined, for the duration of the Festival. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.17)
(February 11, 2015) Letter from Michael Berrtuzzi, Tourism Supervisor, 2015 Pan Am/Parapan Am Games, requesting that the Toronto Attractions Council 2015 Attractions Marketplace to be held on April 9, 2015, from 4:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m., at The Great Hall inside Union Station, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.18)
(February 11, 2015) Letter from Les Murray, Toronto's Festival of Beer, requesting that the Toronto's Festival of Beer 2015 Spring Sessions, to be held at The Sherbourne Commons on April 24, 2015, from 4:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., April 25, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., and April 26, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.19)
(February 12, 2015) Letter from Keith Denning, Roncesvalles Village BIA, requesting that the 10th Annual Roncesvalles Polish Festival and Polka Party to be held on September 18, 2015, from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., September 19, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. until 12:00 a.m., and September 20, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., be declared events of municipal significance; and requesting approval of a road closure of Roncesvalles Avenue from just north of Queen Street West to Dundas Street West (TE.Supp.TE4.67.20)
(February 12, 2015) E-mail from Augustina Saygnavong, requesting that the 4th Year Thesis-Designated Students at OCAD University in Toronto to be held on various dates at 1313-1313 Queen Street West, from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.21)
(February 12, 2015) Letter from Frank Kocis, Spotlight Toronto, requesting that "Curry Fest" to be held on March 22, 2015, from 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m., at 461 King Street West, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.22)
(February 16, 2015) Letter from Jaime Dobbs, The Society of Beer Drinking Ladies, requesting that Bevy 0013 on February 27, 2015 at Jam Factory, 2 Matilda Street, Bevy 0014 on March 27, 2015 at Propeller Coffee Co., 50 Wade Avenue, Bevy 0015 on April 24, 2015 at Ale House's Barrel House, 165 Geary Avenue, and Bevy 0016 on May 29, 2015 at Junction City Music Hall, 2907 Dundas Street West, from 8:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. each event, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.23)
(January 30, 2015) Letter from Lido Chilelli, Coordinator, requesting that The Cabbagetown Festival of the Arts to be held from September 11-13, 2015 from 12:00 noon to 11:00 p.m. daily, be declared an event of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.24)
(January 30, 2015) Letter from Lido Chilelli, on behalf of the Beaches Festival Committee, requesting that the Beaches Canada Day Festival at Woodbine Park on July 1, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., Afrofest at Woodbine Park on July 4 and 5, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m., and the Beaches Jazz Festival at Woodbine Park from July 10-26, 2015, from 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. daily, be declared events of municipal significance. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.25)
(January 30, 2015) Letter from Lido Chilelli, on behalf of the Beaches Festival Committee and The Beaches BIA, requesting approval of temporary patio extensions until 12:00 midnight during the Beaches Jazz StreetFest (Beaches Jazz Festival), to be held on Thursday, July 23, 2015, Friday, July 24, 2015 and Saturday, July 25, 2015, for the establishments listed in the letter. (TE.Supp.TE4.67.26)
(February 11, 2015) E-mail from Virginia Ludy, Canadian National Exhibition, requesting that the 2015 Canadian National Exhibition from August 21 to September 7, 2015), CNE HorseCapades from August 7 to 20, 2015, and the Canadian International Air Show from September 4 to 7, 2015, be declared events of municipal significance; and requesting approval of temporary extensions for a number of licensed restaurants operating during the CNE at Exhibition Place, as well as extended Casino Licence to include the time period as outlined (TE.Supp.TE4.67.27)

Communications (City Council)

(March 19, 2015) Letter from Joanne Williams, General Manager, The Toronto Fringe, requesting an extension of hours in conjunction with the 27th annual Toronto Fringe Festival, taking place from July 1 - 12, 2015 for the Fringe Club in the Honest Ed's Alleyway. (CC.Main.TE4.67.28)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-51976.pdf
(March 4, 2015) Submission from Deborah Egan, Festival Manager, North by Northeast (NXNE), requesting an extension of hours in conjunction with NXNE from 4:00 a.m. Wednesday June 17, 2015 through the early morning hours of Monday June 22, 2015 at Sneaky Dees, 431 College Street, and The Office Pub, 117 John Street. (CC.Main.TE4.67.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-51977.pdf
(March 20, 2015) Letter from Lia Mannella, Administrative Assistant, Food & Beverage, Maple Leaf Sports & Entertainment Ltd., requesting temporary patio extensions for Home Game and Away Game Tailgate Parties being held from April 18 to May 1st and May 2nd to May 15 in conjunction with the NBA Playoffs. (CC.Main.TE4.67.30)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-51978.pdf
(March 27, 2015) E-mail from Patti Marshall, Director of Operations, Toronto Downtown Jazz Society, requesting liquor licence extensions until 4:00 a.m. for the TD Toronto Jazz Festival to be held from June 18 to June 28, 2015 (CC.Supp.TE4.67.31)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52101.pdf
(March 24, 2015) E-mail from Marinda de Beer, Company Manager, Tarragon Theatre, regarding a temporary patio extension for the Fringe Festival to be held from July 1 to July 12, 2015 (CC.Supp.TE4.67.32)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52102.pdf
(March 25, 2015) Letter from Caitlin MacLachlan, Account Specialist, rock-it promotions, inc. requesting a temporary liquor licence/patio extension for the Tiger of Sweden event to be held on May 9 and May 23, 2015 from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. (CC.New.TE4.67.33)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52115.pdf
(March 30, 2015) Letter from Deborah Egan, Festival Manager, North by Northeast (NXNE), requesting an extension of hours in conjunction with NXNE from 4:00 a.m. Wednesday June 17, 2015 through the early morning hours of Monday June 22, 2015 at Sneaky Dees, 431 College Street, The Office Pub, 117 John Street and The Comedy Bar, 945 Bloor Street West. (CC.New.TE4.67.34)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52116.pdf

TE4.74 - Liquor Licence - 913 Dundas Street West - Fleurs Du Mal - File No. 806606

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for Fleurs Du Mal, 913 Dundas Street West (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.         City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

Origin

(February 11, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19, Trinity-Spadina

Summary

An application for a liquor licence has been submitted to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for the premises at 913 Dundas Street West, operating under the name Fleurs Du Mal (“Premises”).  The application is for a restaurant with a proposed indoor capacity of 50 persons and a proposed outdoor capacity of 21 persons. 

 

The Premises is located in an area with a large concentration of licensed establishments and there are concerns related to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. The Registrar of the AGCO should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

Background Information (Community Council)

(February 11, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19, Trinity-Spadina - Liquor Licence - 913 Dundas Street West - Fleurs Du Mal File No. 806606
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76443.pdf

TE4.75 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 254 Monarch Park Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council direct the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a settlement in the appeal of the Committee of Adjustment Applications No. A1096/14TEY and A1097/14TEY and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the appeals on behalf of the City in her discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Ward Councillor.

 

2.         In the event settlement cannot be reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary to support the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in refusing Applications No. A1096/14TEY and A1097/14TEY respecting 254 Monarch Park Avenue.

Origin

(February 17, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mary Fragedakis, Ward 29, Toronto-Danforth

Summary

The owner of 254 Monarch Park Avenue applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Applications No. A1096/14TEY and A1097/14TEY) for minor variances from Zoning By-laws 6752 and 569-2013 to construct a new three-storey single detached dwelling with integral garage on each of Lots 194 and 195, Registered Plan M434.  The requested variances deal with lot coverage, height,   location of first floor area, floor space index, side yard setback, front yard setback, and stair landing encroachment into the front yard.  

 

The variances were refused by the Committee of Adjustment on Wednesday January 28, 2015 (the "Decisions") as the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law are not maintained, the variances are not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land and the variances are not minor in the opinion of the Committee.  Copies of the Decisions are attached.

 

The owner has appealed the Decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board.  A hearing date has not yet been scheduled.

 

Planning staff by its report dated January 22, 2015, a copy of which is attached, recommended to the Committee of Adjustment that should the Committee approve the height and exterior main wall facing a side lot line variances, then the Committee should impose the condition that the proposed single family dwellings be built substantially in accordance with the elevation drawings date stamped received by the Committee on January 5, 2015 showing the elevation at the front of the houses being not higher than 9.00 metres and the rear of the houses not higher than 9.19 metres.

 

This motion would give the City Solicitor authority to attend the OMB hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the applications.  It would also give the City Solicitor authority to negotiate a settlement that resolves the City's concerns.

Background Information (Community Council)

(February 17, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mary Fragedakis - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 254 Monarch Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76673.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 254 Monarch Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76674.pdf
Attachment 2 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 254 Monarch Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76676.pdf
Attachment 3 - Committee of Adjustment Staff Report - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - 254 Monarch Park Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76677.pdf

TE4.76 - Request for Adjournment and Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board - 5 Frankdale Avenue

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
29 - Toronto-Danforth

Community Council Recommendations

The Toronto and East York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.         City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board on March 11, 2015, to request an adjournment of the hearing regarding Application No. A0686/14TEY for the property at 5 Frankdale Avenue. 

 

2.         In the event that an adjournment is granted, City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the rescheduled Ontario Municipal Board hearing and to retain outside consultants as necessary to support the decision of the Committee of Adjustment to refuse the variances regarding Application No. A0686/14TEY for the property at 5 Frankdale Avenue.

Origin

(February 17, 2015) Report from Councillor Mary Fragedakis, Ward 29, Toronto-Danforth

Summary

The applicant has proposed to alter a three-storey semi-detached dwelling at 5 Frankdale Avenue by constructing a rear third storey addition. 

 

The applicant submitted Application No. A0686/14TEY for variances to the Committee of Adjustment.  At its hearing on September 17, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment unanimously refused the variances requested.  A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached.  In the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment, the application did not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan or the Zoning By-law, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and the variances were not considered minor.  

 

The applicant has appealed the refusal of the Committee of Adjustment to the Ontario Municipal Board. The hearing date has been scheduled for March 11, 2015. 

 

This matter is very time sensitive and urgent as City Council next meets on March 31, 2015, which is after the March 11, 2015, hearing date.  Obtaining an adjournment would allow City Council to take a position on whether to authorize the City Solicitor to attend a hearing at a later date to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the application.

Background Information (Community Council)

(February 17, 2015) Letter from Councillor Mary Fragedakis - Request for Adjournment and Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board - 5 Frankdale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76705.pdf
Attachment - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision - Request for Adjournment and Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board - 5 Frankdale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-76706.pdf

New Business - Meeting 5

CC5.1 - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension - Schedule and Budget Change

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Mayor's first Key Matter and first item of business on Tuesday, March 31st.

A presentation has been submitted on this Item (CC5.1a)

Origin

(March 30, 2015) Report from the City Manager

Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that:

 

1.  Council increase the approved 2015 Capital Budget and 2016-2024 Capital Plan for the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension project by $150 million gross, and $90 million net, representing the City of Toronto's share of costs, with the remaining $60 million reflecting the Regional Municipality of York's share.

 

2.  Council request the federal government to increase its funding for the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension project to reflect one-third funding of the original total project cost.

 

3.  Council request the Province of Ontario to ensure that its contribution to the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension project, through the Move Ontario Trust is no less than $1.059 billion as projected at the outset of the project.

 

4.  Council direct the City Manager and the CEO of the Toronto Transit Commission to report back to Executive Committee by December 31, 2015, with

 

a.  the results of  requests made to the Federal and Provincial Governments in support of the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension project, and

 

b.  the final estimated project cost as informed by the pending review of construction claims costs by the Toronto Transit Commission CEO, with recommended sources of funding to complete the project by December 31, 2017.

 

5.  Council authorize a request to the federal Minister of Infrastructure, Communities & Intergovernmental Affairs to extend the Building Canada Fund Contribution Agreement for the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension, to a date to be agreed upon by the parties in recognition of the amended project schedule.

Summary

This report accompanies the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Board Report of March 26, 2015, entitled "Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension – Schedule and Budget Change" (Attachment 1 to this report).  The TTC Report addresses a revised timeline for the completion of the Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension (TYSSE) Project by December 2017, at an additional cost that is currently estimated at $150 million excluding potential cost of claims. Toronto Transit Commission staff, together with external consulting support, will determine the total cost of the project schedule extension, including an assessment of contractor claims, and report back to the TTC Board and Council by the end of 2015.

 

The purpose of this report is to identify the financial impact of the schedule extension, and to obtain the appropriate funding authorities consistent with the revised schedule and expenditure forecast for project completion by December 2017.

 

The report and the decision of Regional Municipality of York ("York Region") Council, also a TYSSE project funding partner (Attachment 2 to this report) is consistent with the recommendations contained in this report.

Background Information

(March 30, 2015) Report from the City Manager on Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension - Schedule and Budget Change (CC5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78233.pdf
Attachment 1 - TTC Board Report of March 26, 2015 - Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension - Schedule and Budget Change
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78648.pdf
Attachment 2 - Minutes No. 72 - Meeting of the Council of the Regional Municipality of York, March 26, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78649.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Report from the City Manager on Toronto-York Spadina Subway Extension - Schedule and Budget Change - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78704.pdf
(March 31, 2015) Presentation from the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission (CC5.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78710.pdf

CC5.2 - Ombudsman correspondence to Mayor and Council

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 23, 2015) Report from the Ombudsman

Recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that:

 

1.  City Council considers and accepts the attached communication from the Ombudsman dated March 23, 2015.

Summary

City Council should consider the attached letter from the Ombudsman.

Background Information

(March 23, 2015) Covering Report from the Ombudsman on Ombudsman correspondence to Mayor and Council (CC5.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78229.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Ombudsman correspondence to Mayor and Council
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78230.pdf

CC5.3 - Appointment Process for the Ombudsman

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 23, 2015) Report from the City Manager

Recommendations

The City Manager recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive this report for information.

Summary

Fiona Crean, the Toronto Ombudsman has notified the City that she does not wish to seek re-appointment for an additional five (5) year non-renewable term.  The extension of the Ombudsman’s current term will therefore end on November 16, 2015.

 

In accordance with Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, Accountability Officers, the City Manager will retain an external recruitment firm to conduct a recruitment process and the Mayor will chair, or designate a chair, and appoint a selection panel to recommend a candidate for City Council's consideration.

Background Information

(March 23, 2015) Report from the City Manager on Appointment Process for the Ombudsman (CC5.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78473.pdf

CC5.4 - 2014 Annual Report of the Ombudsman

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CC5.4.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(March 23, 2015) Report from the Ombudsman

Recommendations

The Ombudsman recommends that:

 

1.         City Council receives the Ombudsman's 2014 annual report for information.

Summary

Pursuant to section 173(2) of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 and the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 3, the Ombudsman is responsible for preparing an annual report on the activities of the office directly to City Council.

Background Information

(March 23, 2015) Covering Report on the 2014 Annual Report of the Ombudsman (CC5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78164.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Toronto Ombudsman's 2014 Annual Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78165.pdf

Communications

(March 30, 2015) E-mail from Anna-Maria Mountfort (CC.New.CC5.4.1)

CC5.5 - Annual Report of the Lobbyist Registrar for the Year 2014

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CC5.5.1 has been submitted on this item.

Origin

(March 23, 2015) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

Recommendations

The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the Annual Report of the Lobbyist Registrar for the Year 2014 for information.

Summary

Attached is the Annual Report of the Lobbyist Registrar on the activities of her office and discharge of her duties in the year 2014.  In addition, in this report the Lobbyist Registrar informs Council that she intends to retire at the end of 2015.

Background Information

(March 23, 2015) Covering Report on the Annual Report of the Lobbyist Registrar for the Year 2014 (CC5.5)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78182.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Annual Report of the Lobbyist Registrar for the Year 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78183.pdf

Communications

(April 1, 2015) Memo from the Integrity Commissioner and the Lobbyist Registrar on holiday gift giving and events, addressed to Members of Council and submitted by Councillor James Pasternak, Ward 10, York Centre (CC.New.CC5.5.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52142.pdf

CC5.6 - Report on an Inquiry into Placing Members of Council in an Apparent Conflict of Interest

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 23, 2015) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

Recommendations

The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the findings in the attached report.

Summary

In the attached report, the Lobbyist Registrar finds that officers of a corporation breached the Lobbying By-law, Sections 140-45B and 140-42A by lobbying the then-mayor and a then-councillor about the relocation of the corporation and by inviting them to a tennis match and dinner.  These activities placed the then-mayor and then-councillor in an apparent conflict of interest as a result of the business relationship between the corporation and the members' family business.


The corporation has registered and reported its lobbying activities, and has undertaken to attend training in the Lobbying By-law.  The corporation and its representatives have undertaken not to lobby a councillor in the current term, in order to avoid placing the councillor in a conflict of interest.

Background Information

(March 23, 2015) Covering Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on the Report on an Inquiry into Placing Members of Council in an Apparent Conflict of Interest (CC5.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78186.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Report to Council on an Inquiry into Placing Members of Council in an Apparent Conflict of Interest
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78187.pdf

CC5.7 - Report on an Inquiry into Placing a City Employee in an Apparent Conflict of Interest

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Origin

(March 23, 2015) Report from the Lobbyist Registrar

Recommendations

The Lobbyist Registrar recommends that:

 

1.  City Council receive the findings in the attached report.

Summary

In the attached report, the Lobbyist Registrar has found that lobbying activities by two consultant lobbyists placed a City employee in an apparent conflict of interest, contrary to the Lobbying By-law, Section 140-45B.  The apparent conflict of interest arose from the spousal relationship between the City employee and another consultant lobbyist with the same lobbying firm.


The lobbying firm has consulted with the Lobbyist Registrar on a protocol to ensure compliance with the Lobbying By-law.  The Registrar requests the firm to continue to consult with the Registrar on its compliance protocol, and to seek the Registrar’s advice on any potential conflicts of interest that may arise.

Background Information

(March 23, 2015) Covering Report from the Lobbyist Registrar on the Report on an Inquiry into Placing a City Employee in an Apparent Conflict of Interest (CC5.7)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78184.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Report to Council on an Inquiry into Placing a City Employee in an Apparent Conflict of Interest
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78185.pdf

CC5.8 - Integrity Commissioner Report on Violation of Code of Conduct: Then-Mayor Rob Ford

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
Communication CC5.8.1 has been submitted on this Item.

Origin

(March 25, 2015) Report from the Integrity Commissioner

Recommendations

The Integrity Commissioner recommends that:

 

1. Council adopt a finding that Councillor Ford violated Article XIV of the Code of Conduct while acting in his capacity as Mayor of Toronto.

Summary

On July 8, 2014, a resident filed a complaint alleging that then-Mayor Rob Ford violated Article XIV (Discreditable Conduct) of the Code of Conduct for Members of Council (the "Code of Conduct") because he used racial slurs.  Mr. Ford admitted and took responsibility for his conduct.

 

I have concluded that the conduct was contrary to the Code of Conduct. Councillor Ford agrees and plans to specifically address the issue before Council.  In light of his planned apology, no further remedial action is necessary.

Background Information

(March 25, 2015) Covering Report from the Integrity Commissioner on Violation of Code of Conduct: then-Mayor Rob Ford (CC5.8)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78435.pdf
(March 25, 2015) Attachment 1 - Integrity Commissioner Report Regarding Conduct of Then-Mayor Rob Ford
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78467.pdf

Communications

(March 31, 2015) Submission from Councilllor Gord Perks, Ward 14 Parkdale-High Park - Toronto Star article (CC.New.CC5.8.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/comm/communicationfile-52120.pdf

CC5.9 - 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road, 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street, and 603, 605, 607, 609 and 611 Sherbourne Street - OMB Hearing - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Confidential Attachment - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and potential litigation

Origin

(April 1, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report;

 

2.  The Recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to this report and Appendix "A" of Confidential Attachment 1, be made public if Council adopts Recommendation 1; and

 

3.  Except as provided in Recommendation 2 above, all other information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

At its meeting December 16, 17 & 18, 2013 City Council approved official plan and zoning amendment applications relating to 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road, 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street, and 603, 605, 607, 609 and 611 Sherbourne Street.  The applicant subsequently made a pre-emptive "friendly" appeal of the applications to the Ontario Municipal Board in anticipation of an appeal by the South Rosedale Residents' Association at the time the bills were enacted.  A 13-day hearing has been scheduled to commence May 12, 2015.  The South Rosedale Residents' Association are a party in opposition to the applications as is St. James Town Family Literacy Services.  Board assisted mediation discussions were initiated in January.  The purpose of this report is to seek instruction for the Ontario Municipal Board hearing.

Background Information

(April 1, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road, 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street, and 603, 605, 607, 609 and 611 Sherbourne Street - OMB Hearing - Request for Direction Report (CC5.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78761.pdf
(March 23, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 Glen Road, 4, 6, 58, 60, 62, 64, 76 and 100 Howard Street, and 603, 605, 607, 609 and 611 Sherbourne Street - OMB Hearing - Request for Direction - Notice of Pending Report (CC5.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78181.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on April 2, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78779.pdf

CC5.10 - 70-72 Carlton Street - Appeals of Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Approval Applications - Potential Request for Directions Report to Council on March 31, 2015

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale

Origin

(March 24, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.         City Council consider a possible forthcoming report on a request for direction on this matter.

Summary

This application proposes to redevelop the lands at 70-72 Carlton Street, at the northwest corner of Carlton and Church Streets, for a 41-storey mixed use building consisting of approximately 496 residential units and 13 residential rental replacement units, plus commercial area in the lower floors of a 7-storey podium. Following mediation at the Ontario Municipal Board, discussions have continued between the City and the applicant. The purpose of this report is to advise that the City Solicitor may be reporting to the March 31, 2015 meeting of City Council to seek further instructions.

Background Information

(March 24, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on 70-72 Carlton Street - Appeals of Zoning Amendment and Site Plan Approval Applications - Potential Request for Directions at Council on March 31, 2015 - Notice of Pending Report (CC5.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78488.pdf

CC5.11 - Court Decision regarding Municipal Code Chapter 545 Article VIII, Owners and Drivers of Taxicabs

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
This item will be considered at 2:00pm on April 2, 2015

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(March 24, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in Attachment 1.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the Confidential Recommendations if adopted and that the balance of Attachment 1 remain confidential.

Summary

This report summarizes the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released on January 30, 2015 in a court application regarding Municipal Code Chapter 545, Article VIII, Owners and Drivers of Taxicabs.  The confidential portion of this report (Attachment 1) provides confidential information and recommendations regarding this decision.

Background Information

(March 24, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on Court Decision regarding Municipal Code Chapter 545 Article VIII, Owners and Drivers of Taxicabs (CC5.11)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78305.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC5.12 - 2265 - 2279 Bloor Street West and 116 and 240 Durie Street, EY35.11, Request for Direction Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(March 24, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  Council adopt the recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report.

 

2.  The recommendations contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to this report and the information contained in Appendices "A" and "B" be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor. All other information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 is to remain confidential.

Summary

The City and the other parties to the proceedings participated in mediation at the Ontario Municipal Board (the "OMB") on January 6 and 7, 2015, and as a result further direction from City Council is required.

Background Information

(March 24, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on 2265 - 2279 Bloor Street West and 116 and 240 Durie Street, EY35.11, Request for Direction - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control (CC5.12)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78486.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on April 14, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-79064.pdf
Confidential instructions attached to motion 1 by Councillor Doucette - made public on April 20, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-79210.pdf

CC5.13 - 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
7 - York West

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board and the receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(March 24, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.         City Council adopt the Confidential Recommendations in Attachment 6.

 

2.         City Council authorize the public release of the Confidential Recommendations adopted by Council in Attachment 6, if adopted by City Council.

Summary

The purpose of this report is to request direction from City Council regarding a pending Ontario Municipal Board hearing, scheduled to begin on April 7, 2015, on the application for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments at 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue.

 

At its meeting of August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014, City Council opposed the application, required the applicant to submit outstanding materials related to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code and directed Planning staff to continue discussions with the applicant to bring the application into conformity with the policies of the Neighbourhoods designation of the Official Plan.

 

Discussions have continued and the applicant has submitted plans, dated February 27, 2015, for a revised proposal that addresses City Planning concerns regarding the proposed building massing, setbacks and shadow impact.  This report has been prepared in consultation with City Planning.

Background Information

(March 24, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on 2849, 2851, 2853, 2855 and 2857 Islington Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Request for Direction with Attachments 1 to 5 (CC5.13)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78492.pdf
Confidential Attachment 6 - Confidential Information

CC5.14 - 1001 Ellesmere Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - OMB Hearing - Request for Directions

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
37 - Scarborough Centre

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(March 25, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the recommendations in Attachment 1 and Appendices 1, 2, 3 and 4 if adopted, and the remainder of Attachment 1 remain confidential.

Summary

The owner of the property located at 1001 Ellesmere Road proposes to redevelop a former industrial site with 95 townhouses and a 4-storey commercial building.  They have appealed their Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision applications to the Ontario Municipal Board due to the City's lack of decision within the statutory timeframe.  A pre-hearing for the matter has been set for April 8, 2015.

Background Information

(March 25, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on 1001 Ellesmere Road - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - OMB Hearing - Request for Directions (CC5.14)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78494.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendices 1, 2, 3 and 4 - made public on April 13, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-79008.pdf

CC5.15 - 40 Reading Court - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
2 - Etobicoke North

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Origin

(March 25, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor

Recommendations

The City Solicitor recommends that:

 

1.  Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Attachment 1.

 

2.  Council authorize the public release of the recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 if adopted and the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Attachment 2 remain confidential.

Summary

The owners of 40 Reading Court propose to build a 4-storey, 11,198 square metre place of worship with ancillary uses on the property.  The proposed building would include office and meeting space, classrooms, library, gymnasium, pastor's offices, pastor's residence, a café, bookstore, chapel and daycare centre.  The proposed development would contain 392 surface parking spaces and result in a floor space index of 0.53 times the lot area with a proposed capacity of approximately 1,350 congregants within its sanctuary.

 

The owners of the property have appealed their Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval applications to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) due to a lack of decision by the City within the statutory time frame.

Background Information

(March 25, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on 40 Reading Court - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing (CC5.15)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78502.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1

CC5.16 - Appointment of Interest Group Member to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management

Origin

(March 24, 2015) Letter from the Facilities and Finance Nominating Panel, transmitted by the City Clerk

Recommendations

The City Clerk transmits the Decision Letter from the Facilities and Finance Nominating Panel.

 

The Facilities and Finance Nominating Panel recommends that:

 

1.  City Council appoint Stefania Paterak as the Corporation of Massey Hall and Roy Thomson Hall representative to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management, at pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2018, and until a successor is appointed.

 

2.  City Council direct that the confidential information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 remain confidential in its entirety as it relates to personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management.

Summary

The Corporation of Massey Hall and Roy Thomson Hall is forwarding its recommended interest group nominee for appointment to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management.

Background Information

(March 24, 2015) Decision Letter from the Facilities and Finance Nominating Panel (CC5.16)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78455.htm
(March 17, 2015) Report from the City Clerk on Appointment of Interest Group Member to the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78456.pdf
(August 18, 2015) Attachment 1 - Nomination Letter from the Corporation of Massey Hall and Roy Thomson Hall
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-78457.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - Application for the interest group nominee for the Yonge-Dundas Square Board of Management

Member Motions - Meeting 5

MM5.1 - 8 Farmbrook Road - Request for City Solicitor to Attend at the Ontario Municipal Board - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board, together with appropriate Community Planning staff, in support of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment in refusing Application No. A267/14SC respecting 8 Farmbrook Road.

Summary

At its hearing on December 11, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused Application No. A267/14SC respecting 8 Farmbrook Road to reconstruct an existing deck above the detached garage. The Committee of Adjustment Decision is attached.  In the report dated December 3, 2014 to the Committee of Adjustment, Community Planning recommended that the requested variances be refused.  Planning staff believe the potential noise, privacy, and overlook impacts caused by the deck above the detached garage and its proximity to the property lines would adversely affect the use and enjoyment of the rear yards of the surrounding neighbours.  Further, the situation at 8 Farmbrook Road would be the only one of its kind in the neighbourhood and would not be in keeping with the prevailing character of the area.  The report (December 3, 2014) from Community Planning is attached.

 

The applicant has appealed the refusal decision of the Committee of Adjustment to the Ontario Municipal Board.  A hearing is scheduled for April 15, 2015, and as such this is a time sensitive matter.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78520.pdf
(December 11, 2014) Committee of Adjustment, Scarborough Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 8 Farmbrook Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78235.pdf
(December 3, 2014) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District on 8 Farmbrook Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78236.pdf

MM5.2 - Authorization to Release Section 42 Funds from various developments in Ward 11 for the Purchase of Outdoor Fitness Equipment for Denison Park - by Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
11 - York South-Weston
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Frances Nunziata, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the approved 2015 Operating Budget for Parks, Forestry and Recreation by $22,932.67 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 42 Alternate Rate Cash-in-lieu funds secured from the following developments: 45 East Drive, 29 East Drive, 1919 Weston Road, 140 Spears Street, 48 Norval Street (Part 1), 19 John Street (Part 2) (17 John Best Way), 44a Blakley Avenue, 2391 St. Clair Avenue West, 55 Scarlett Road, 2 Bexley Crescent (Part 2), 890 Jane Street, 2048 Weston Road, 1385 Weston Road and 1023 Weston Road for the purchase of improvements to the grounds at Denison Park including outdoor fitness equipment.

Summary

Section 42 funds have been secured and received in connection with the following developments in Ward 11: 45 East Drive (XR2213-4200112), 29 East Drive (XR2213-4200125), 1919 Weston Road (XR2213-4200170), 140 Spears Street (XR2213-4200171), 48 Norval Street (Part 1) (XR2213-4200196), 19 John Street (Part 2) (17 John Best Way) (XR2213-4200270), 44a Blakley Avenue (XR2213-4200271), 2391 St. Clair Avenue West (XR2213-4200368), 55 Scarlett Road (XR2213-4200426), 2 Bexley Crescent (Part 2) (XR2213-4200425), 890 Jane Street (XR2213-4200424), 2048 Weston Road (XR2213-4200444), 1385 Weston Road (XR2213-4200595) and 1023 Weston Road (XR2213-4200633).

 

The funds secured through Section 42 provide the opportunity for the acquisition and installation of callisthenic equipment to be installed in Denison Park, as requested by residents at a community meeting.  This will be the second park in Ward 11 to have outdoor fitness equipment.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78522.pdf
(April 1, 2015) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78766.pdf

MM5.3 - 2 Station Road - Deletion of Proposed Condition in Zoning By-law - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Bill 370 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct that the amendment to the Etobicoke Zoning Code under Item EY34.5 and the redevelopment of the existing Wesley Mimico United Church at 2 Station Road shall not include a condition that the zoning by-law become null and void in the event that the development proposal does not proceed within five years.

 

2.  City Council determine that the revision made to the proposed zoning by-law is minor in nature and, pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further public notice is required in respect of the proposed zoning by-law.

Summary

Etobicoke York Community Council Item EY34.5 approved an amendment to the Etobicoke Zoning Code to permit additions to, and the internal conversion of, the existing Wesley Mimico United Church at 2 Station Road to facilitate the redevelopment of this site to a multi-use facility that includes a new worship area, community uses and 30 seniors' apartments.

 

One of the conditions to the approval requires that the proposed zoning by-law amendment shall be come null and void if the proposed redevelopment does not proceed within five years after the passage of the by-law. Although the Province of Ontario enacted legislation some years ago to enable conditional zoning, that conditional zoning authority was made subject to regulations - and the Province has not yet authorized regulations for conditional zoning.

 

As a result, this Motion proposes that reference to such condition not be included in the proposed zoning by-law.

 

This Motion is urgent on the basis that the applicant has significant financial, legal and contractual deadlines to address before the next Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78523.pdf

MM5.4 - New Liquor Licence Application - 466 Dovercourt Road - Matador Ballroom - Licence No. 817199 - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ("AGCO") that the issuance of a liquor licence for Matador Ballroom, 466 Dovercourt Road (the "Premises"), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the AGCO and the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City of Toronto with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

An application for a new liquor licence by The Matador Corporation has been made to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ("AGCO") for an establishment to be known as the Matador Ballroom at 466 Dovercourt Road (the "Premises"). The application is for a proposed indoor capacity of 804 patrons. The Premises has historically operated as an assembly hall, dance hall and a country/rock after-hours club that closed in 2006. It is proposed that the Premises will continue the historical use to operate as an entertainment facility, concert hall and event facility.

 

The Premises is located immediately adjacent to a residential area, and in particular it directly abuts a lot that contains a semi-detached dwelling. Neighbouring residents and the local Councillor’s office are concerned that the operation of a licenced entertainment facility, including, but not limited to a concert hall and special event facility with a capacity of 804 patrons will negatively impact neighbouring residents. Under the current in-force Zoning By-law and the new City harmonized Zoning By-law (under appeal) an Entertainment Facility/Nightclub is not a permitted use on the site. However, the use may be permitted as being legal non-conforming because of the historical use. Potential impacts relate to noise, safety, crowd control, litter, and other matters.

 

The issuance of a liquor licence for the Premises is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the municipality in which the premises are located. At a minimum this application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence.

 

Urgent consideration is being requested as the AGCO deadline for objections to this application was March 15, 2015.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78524.pdf

MM5.5 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from 324-328 and 332 Richmond Street West for Street Kiosks at Scadding Court Community Centre - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the 2015 Approved Capital Budget for Facilities, Real Estate, Environment and  Energy by adding a new project for $100,000 gross, partially funded by Section 37 community benefits secured as part of the development at 324-328 and 332 Richmond Street West (source account: 220096) amounting to $80,000 and $20,000 as Contribution to Capital from the 2015 Approved Operating Budget for the Association of Community Centres for Scadding Court Community Centre to provide one-time funding for capital improvements to street kiosks at the Scadding Community Centre.

Summary

Authority is being sought to amend the 2015 Approved Capital Budget for Facilities, Real Estate,
Environment & Energy by adding a new project for $100,000 gross, partially funded by Section 37 community benefits amounting to $80,000; and $20,000 as Contribution to Capital from the 2015 Approved Operating Budget for the Association of Community Centres for Scadding Court Community Centre.

 

The development at 324-328 and 332 Richmond Street West secured various community benefits through Section 37 of the Planning Act that included funding for Scadding Court Community Centre capital improvements in the amount of $80,000.00.  These funds have been received by the City.

 

Scadding Court Community Centre operates a vibrant outdoor neighbourhood market, Market 707, that uses business and community economic development to animate the streetscape, link surrounding neighbourhoods, generate jobs and revitalize an underutilized area of the City.  Market 707 was created in response to community feedback and a desire for broadened local employment opportunities, and has been an ideal location for the development of local business.

 

Colourful salvaged shipping containers retrofitted by Storstac, serve as street kiosks and form the basis of Market 707. With hundreds of people coming by to shop, snack and enjoy, this space has successfully been transformed into a vibrant community and entrepreneurial space.

 

There are no operating financial implications arising from the approval of this Motion as the 2015 Approved Operating Budget for Scadding Court Community Centre already includes $20,000 to provide partial funding for this project with the remaining project costs of $80,000 to be funded by Sec 37 community benefits.

 

The Section 37 funding will support additional local opportunities at Market 707 through the purchase of an additional container and conversion/redevelopment of an existing container to enhance the number and quality of kiosks in the Market.  This will provide additional spaces for social entrepreneurship and community economic development. In addition, the funding will provide beautification and refurbishment of existing containers.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM5.5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78525.pdf
(April 1, 2015) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78767.pdf

MM5.6 - Liquor Licence Application - 570 Bloor Street West - Real Thailand Restaurant - Licence No. 202285 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the application for a liquor licence for Real Thailand Restaurant, 570 Bloor Street West (the “Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request that the AGCO and the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the AGCO and the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor. 

Summary

Real Thailand Restaurant Inc. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for a premises at 570 Bloor Street West operating under the name Real Thailand Restaurant (the “Premises”). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for a capacity of 110 patrons for an indoor area. 

 

The Premises is located adjacent to a residential neighbourhood and impacts associated with the operation of the Premises may disturb neighbouring residents. Therefore, the application for the liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions addressing the concerns of the community are added to the licence. Under no circumstance should a liquor sales licence be granted at the Premises without appropriate conditions attached.

 

This matter is deemed urgent as the deadline to object to the application was March 19, 2015.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.6
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78526.pdf

MM5.7 - Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 693 Bathurst Street - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a Transmittal on this Item (MM5.7a with recommendations)

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

 1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the report (March 9, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning.

Summary

At its meeting of March 24, 2015, the Toronto Preservation Board considered a report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, recommending City Council approve the alterations to the heritage property at 693 Bathurst Street to allow for the installation of a temporary, seasonal air-supported sports dome structure. 

 

The dome is proposed to be a temporary structure erected annually, generally between November and April. A one-storey permanent entrance/exit building would be located at the north-east corner of the sports field for access to the dome, field and track, and a permanent mechanical unit is proposed in the same location to accommodate the air handling equipment.

 

On September 30, 2013, the applicant filed an application for a Minor Variance with the Committee of Adjustment.  The Committee of Adjustment refused the Minor Variance and the Toronto District School Board appealed the decision to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  An OMB-assisted mediation has taken place.

 

This Motion is urgent as the applicant needs to begin construction to facilitate the construction of the dome so as to be ready in September when the students return to class.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.7
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78527.pdf
(March 9, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning on Alteration of Designated Heritage Property - 693 Bathurst Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78433.pdf
Attachments 1 to 8 - Location map, photographs, drawings and renderings
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78462.pdf
(March 25, 2015) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Alteration of a Designated Heritage Property - 693 Bathurst Street (MM5.7a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78434.pdf

MM5.8 - Release of Section 37 Funds for Streetscape Improvements at Methuen Avenue and Jane Street within the Baby Point Gates BIA - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the approved 2015 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $150,000.00 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West ($131,280 from source account: XR3026-3700526) and 2500 Bloor Street West ($18,720 from source account: XR3026-3700601), for the purpose of streetscape improvements at Methuen Avenue and Jane Street.

Summary

The City has a long-standing partnership with the Baby Point Gates Business Improvement Area (BIA).  The BIA is proposing to implement a streetscape improvement project at Methuen Avenue and Jane Street in 2015.  However, there is currently no funding included in the 2015 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture for this project.

 

The streetscape improvements will create a public space with landscaping and seating area which will act as a gateway to the BIA.

 

Funds have been secured and through a Section 37 agreement for the development at 2464, 2474, 2490 and 2500 Bloor Street West (1 and 2 Old Mill Drive) for the purpose of Jane Street/Baby Point streetscape improvements, and have been received by the City.  The following funding is available:

 

- $131,280 from 2464, 2474 and 2490 Bloor Street West (1 Old Mill Drive), (source account: XR3026-3700526)

- $18,720 from 2500 Bloor Street West (2 Old Mill Drive), (source account: XR3026-3700601)

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.8
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78530.pdf
(April 1, 2015) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78768.pdf

MM5.9 - 1340-1360 Danforth Road - Minor Revisions to Zoning By-law - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Jim Karygiannis

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
38 - Scarborough Centre
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Bill 383 has been submitted on this Item.

Recommendations

Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Jim Karygiannis, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Item SC34.30 as follows:

 

a.  Part 3.b.2 be deleted and replaced with the following:

 

"the owner shall within six months of issuance of an above-grade building permit on Parcel B,  provide approximately 134 square metres of multi-purpose amenity space to be provided within the building at 1340 Danforth Road, on the ground floor (at grade level).  The owner will provide furnishings and finishes appropriate to its use, including washroom facilities for the use and enjoyment of all residents of the rental buildings at 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road.  The owner shall submit a letter of credit for 120 percent of the value of the amenity space to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner prior to the first above-grade building permit on Parcel B;".

 

b.  Part 3.b.3 be deleted and replaced with the following:

 

"the owner shall within six months of issuance of the first above-grade building permit on Parcel B, provide approximately 90 square metres of amenity space in the building at 1360 Danforth Road with furnishings and finishes appropriate to its use for the use and enjoyment of all residents of the rental buildings at 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road.   The owner shall submit a letter of credit for 120 percent of the value of the amenity space to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner prior to the first above-grade building permit on Parcel B;".

 

c.  Part 3.c.2 be deleted and replaced with the following:

 

"the owner shall provide, within six months of the first above-grade building permit on Parcel B, a minimum of four security cameras within the underground parking garages of 1340 and 1360 Danforth Road to cover all entrances and exits within the respective garages.  The owner shall submit a letter of credit for 120 percent of the value of this work to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner prior to the first above-grade building permit on Parcel B;".

 

d.  Part 3.c.3 be deleted and replaced with the following:

 

"the owner shall provide, within six months of the first above-grade building permit on Parcel B, a minimum of three new lighting structures; one near the underground parking entrance for 1340 Danforth Road and two near the underground parking entrance for 1360 Danforth Road. The owner shall submit a letter of credit for 120 percent of the value of this work to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner prior to the first above-grade building permit on Parcel B;".

 

e.  City Council redirect one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) for improvements for playground equipment at the Toronto Community Housing Building located at the south-west corner of Markham Road and Eglinton Avenue to the following:

 

i.  one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000.00) in the form of a payment to Toronto Community Housing Corporation and/or Tropicana Community Services and/or the South Asian Autism Awareness Centre for playground / daycare / facility / office / program improvements at 3171/3181 Eglinton Avenue East and/or 400 McCowan Road (including the Children of Tomorrow Day Care) and/or 1970 Ellesmere Road (including recreational and program improvements for the autism centre).

  

2.  City Council determine that the revisions made to the proposed zoning by-law is minor in nature and, pursuant to subsection 34(17) of the Planning Act, no further public notice is required in respect of the proposed zoning by-law.

Summary

On August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014, City Council adopted Item SC34.30 and thereby approved a zoning amendment to permit the development of a new 18-storey condominium building behind three existing 15-storey rental apartment buildings at 1340, 1350 and 1360 Danforth Road.

 

As a result of discussions regarding the amount of indoor amenity space in 1340 Danforth Road and 1360 Danforth Road, some minor changes are requested.  If this Motion is adopted 1340 Danforth Road would have a minimum of 134 square metres (rather than 149 square metres) and 1360 Danforth Road would have a minimum of 90 square metres (rather than 61 square metres) of amenity space.

 

If adopted, this Motion would also change the timing requirements previously adopted by City Council for the provision of the amenity space, the provision of security cameras and new lighting structures for the rental apartment buildings from prior to building permit issuance of the condominium building to within six months of issuance of an above-grade building permit for the new condominium building, along with a submission of a letter of credit for 120 percent of the value of the work prior to the first above-grade building permit.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM5.9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78531.pdf

MM5.10 - Alternative Options for Stronger Accountability - by Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Stephen Holyday, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the City Manager to report to the Executive Committee by June 2015 with a review of the four Accountability Officers focussing on the legal, technical and process implications of appointing:

 

a.  one Officer to fulfil the roles of both the Ombudsman and the Auditor General; and

 

b.  one Officer to fulfil the roles of both the Integrity Commissioner and the Lobbyist Registrar.

 

2.  City Council request the City Manager to work with the Accountability Officers and report to the Executive Committee in September 2015 on any opportunities for synergy and efficiency, where not already in place, and on the feasibility of combining common functions, processes, staff, facilities and information technology of the four Accountability Officers to strengthen and enhance seamless services, promote integrated casework, and to realize economies.

Summary

In light of Executive Committee Item EX4.1 regarding changes to the Toronto Municipal Code for the purpose of amending term lengths, and possible strategies to fill future vacancies in Accountability Officer positions, that discussion would benefit from an options analysis of appointing a single individual to fill multiple roles.

 

There are possible synergies to be found by combining oversight of investigative and reporting functions while maintaining compliance with existing legislation which requires Accountability Officers for the City of Toronto.

 

This Motion requests a review of the Accountability Officers with a focus on the legal, technical and process implications of having a single individual fulfil more than one accountability role, while maintaining full services of each office. The impetus of such a change would be better service to citizens through coordinated intake and triage of cases, better information leverage, prioritization of resource and investigator allocation, increased subject matter expertise capacity, and stronger external communications.

 

The Motion also requests an overall review of common functions which support the four Accountability Officers to look for new opportunities of economy and stronger internal processes, including cooperative approaches to facilities and information technology.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.10
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78506.pdf

MM5.11 - Safety in the Air: Governing Drones in Toronto's Outdoor Spaces - by Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor John Campbell

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor James Pasternak, seconded by Councillor John Campbell, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal, Licensing and Standards to report back to City Council by September 2015 with a strategy governing the use of drones in the City of Toronto's outdoor spaces that would include but not be restricted to:

 

a.  any current policies that can be leveraged to ensure the safety of Toronto's airspace;
b.  any safety concerns or potential liability issues the City could face due to the use of drones on City of Toronto property;
c.  investigating the need for possible restrictions on the use of drones and photography above City of Toronto outdoor recreation and park facilities;
d.  the potential to permit the use of drones in designated spaces; and
e.  restrictions on the types and/or models of drones that can be operated in the City of Toronto.

Summary

There is an increasing number of personal unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), commonly known as a drones, being used by members of the public for recreation and commercial purposes. This has led to several recent high profile incidents of drones being flown in restricted or private airspace including a drone crashing on to the White House Lawn in January 2015. A drone near Pearson International Airport forced a pilot to change a plane's landing path.

 

Transport Canada allows drones less than 35kg to be flown for personal use but recommends that drones be flown during daylight, in good weather and not near airports, in populated areas, near moving vehicles or higher than 90 metres. Using drones for commercial or research purposes requires meeting a number of requirements and in some cases, receiving explicit permission.

 

The City of Toronto is responsible for an enormous amount of outdoor spaces including road, sidewalks, parks and recreation facilities such as soccer fields, rinks, basketball courts and golf courses. City Council is seeking clarity for the use of drones over City of Toronto outdoor spaces.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.11
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78521.pdf

MM5.12 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision respecting 164 St. Leonards Avenue (A1024/14NY) - by Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
25 - Don Valley West
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Jaye Robinson, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the Committee of Adjustment's decision to approve the minor variances related to 164 St Leonards Avenue (A1024/14NY) and to retain outside consultants, if necessary.

Summary

The North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment approved an application for minor variances related to the property municipally known as 164 St. Leonards Avenue on February 19, 2015.

 

The application sought variances related to landscaping, height, depth, length and setback requirements. The community has voiced significant concerns about the impact of these variances on the existing streetscape and the privacy of immediate neighbours.

 

The community appealed this decision to the Ontario Municipal Board. This item is urgent because it is necessary to give instructions to City staff to prepare for the hearing.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.12
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78507.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 164 St. Leonards Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78472.pdf

MM5.13 - Site Plan Application for 5365 Dundas Street West - Revision to Section 37 Agreement - by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, seconded by Councillor John Campbell

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, seconded by Councillor John Campbell, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct that section 10.1 of the Section 37 Agreement dated March 1, 2005 entered into between the City of Toronto and the former Owner of 5365 Dundas Street West, Canadian Tire Corporation, be revised as between the City and the current Owner, Concert Real Estate Corporation, to delete the current section 10.1 and replace it with a new section 10.1 as follows:

 

"The Owner shall provide, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services, detailed servicing, storm water management and site grading reports for his or her review prior to site plan approval under section 41 of the Planning Act and under section 114 of the City of Toronto Act with respect to any portion of the site. The Owner acknowledges that current servicing capacity issues must be resolved prior to site plan approval at such stage of phased site plan approval as the Executive Director of Engineering and Construction Services shall require. The Owner shall be responsible for the cost of addressing such capacity issues and shall enter into such development or servicing agreements to address this obligation as may be required. It is agreed and understood between the Parties, without deciding whether or not any such work is properly the subject of a development charge credit, that the provisions of this paragraph will not prejudice the right of the Owner to apply for development charge credits in respect of the works required by this paragraph."

Summary

By-law 735-2014(OMB) authorizes the development of the former Canadian Tire site at 5365 Dundas Street West for residential and commercial uses within 6 buildings ranging in height from 3 to 28 storeys for total of 1,590 units.

 

The Section 37 Agreement for the premises provides for a number of community benefits. In addition, it addresses a number of functional matters pertaining to the development. One such matter required that, prior to any site plan approval, the owner resolve servicing capacity issues.

 

Staff are currently processing a site plan application for an initial phase of the development and have determined that there is servicing capacity for this initial phase.

 

This Motion proposes that the Section 37 Agreement be revised to provide that the owner shall submit detailed servicing reports for each subsequent phase of the development proposal and shall resolve servicing capacity issues when required to do so by staff.

 

This Motion is urgent on the basis that the applicant has significant financial, legal and contractual deadlines to address in relation to its site plan obligations before the next Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.13
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78508.pdf

MM5.14 - Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 774 Yonge Street - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

The Toronto Preservation Board has submitted a Transmittal on this Item (MM5.14a with recommendations)

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the recommendations contained in the report (March 10, 2015) from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning.

Summary

At its meeting of March 24, 2015, Toronto Preservation Board considered a report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning, recommending City Council state its intention to designate the properties at 774 Yonge Street (including the addresses of 774 ½ and 776 Yonge Street) under part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

On January 21, 2015, the owner of the properties at 774 Yonge Street submitted a Demolition Application, #2015 107080, to the City Building Division.

 

As the properties at 774 Yonge Street are included on the City's Heritage Register, the owner is required under the Ontario Heritage Act to give the City 60 days notice of an intention to demolish with an application, "Notice of Intention to Demolish a Listed Building or Structure under The Ontario Heritage Act."  This 60 day period is used by Heritage Preservation Services to evaluate a property to determine if it should be designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

 

The Owner has yet to submit and complete an application, "Notice of Intention to Demolish" to commence the 60 days waiting period.   To prevent demolition and protect the cultural heritage values and attributes of the properties, City Council must state its intention to designate the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.14
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78509.pdf
(March 10, 2015) Report from the Director, Urban Design, City Planning on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 774 Yonge Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78479.pdf
(March 25, 2015) Transmittal from the Toronto Preservation Board on Intention to Designate under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - 774 Yonge Street (MM5.14a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78480.pdf

MM5.15 - Protecting Toronto Drinking Water - Requiring automatic shut off valves on potentially dangerous pipelines on either side of Toronto's major watercourses - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Communication MM5.15.1 has been submitted on this Item

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request Enbridge to install automatic shut-off valves on either side of the City of Toronto's major watercourses.

 
2.   City Council request that the National Energy Board not allow Enbridge the Leave to Open on the grounds that Condition 16 of the National Energy Board's decision has not been fully met at water crossings along Line 9B and therefore the Greater Toronto Area's drinking water have been left at risk.

Summary

Enbridge has applied to the National Energy Board (NEB) to reverse the flow of Line 9B, increase the overall flow of the pipeline from 240,000 to 300,000 barrels per day, and allow the pipeline to transport heavy crude oil, including bitumen.

 

Line 9B runs through the City of Toronto, crossing our major watercourses, which flow directly into Lake Ontario, our source for drinking water. The City of Toronto has a strong interest in protecting its assets and population, and therefore participated in the NEB hearing as an official intervenor, as did the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA).

 

The NEB approved Enbridge's application, subject to 30 detailed conditions. These 30 conditions need to be met before Enbridge can apply for a Leave to Open (LTO), which would allow Enbridge to implement the changes to Line 9B.

 

The City of Toronto and other intervenors have no formal input into the LTO decision, but the NEB has directed Enbridge to consult us on request and the City has the option of lodging a complaint with the NEB if we believe Enbridge is non-compliant with the NEB's conditions.

Condition 16 by the NEB, was that Line 9B meet the Canadian Code and Standards Association (CSA) requirements that automatic shut off valves be placed on both sides of major water crossings, which include the Humber, Don, and Rouge as well as other watercourses within Toronto.

 

As late as October 2014, the NEB said that Enbridge had not met Condition 16 and did not have shut-off valves on both sides of major water crossings.  At the time, the NEB argued "that only 6 of the 104 MWCs identified by Enbridge to date appear to have valves installed within 1 km on both sides of the water crossing, while the majority appear to have valves installed more than 10 km from the water crossing on at least one side".

 

Pipeline spills do happen, though infrequently. The City of Toronto submitted a list of recent spills as part of its evidence to the NEB, which is attached to this Motion. When spills do happen, the environmental impacts are significant, expensive and long lasting. We need to make sure that Enbridge is doing everything within their power to ensure that they can stop the flow from a spill from entering Toronto's drinking water. Currently, Enbridge does not have valves on both sides of any of our major water crossings and in almost all cases there is not a valve within 10 kilometres.

 

In its evidence to the NEB, the TRCA expressed serious concerns that there are not enough automatic shut-off valves in the GTA, given the significance of our watershed, urban population, and infrastructure, especially our drinking water intakes and source water protection areas.

 

The TRCA pointed out that it could take up to 2 hours before Enbridge even detects a leak or spill through their automated systems, and then for the automatic shut-off valves to be triggered. That means that for more than 2 hours oil could be spilling into our rivers and beginning to flow down to our drinking water.

 

The distance between a shut-off valve and the watercourse means that even when the valve is closed the oil remaining in the pipeline may continue to flow towards the watercourse. Depending on traffic conditions, it could take Enbridge's Emergency Response team hours to get to the leak site. It could be 4 to 6 hours before the leak is detected and Enbridge is onsite to stop the leak. According to the TRCA, within that time the spill would have reached Lake Ontario and our drinking water.

 

Toronto's four water treatment plants serve over 2.6 million people in Toronto, serving industrial, commercial, institutional and household water uses. We also serve 600,000 residents in Richmond Hill and Vaughan. The intakes for our water treatment plants (with the exception of the island water plant) are along the near shore zone of Lake Ontario. That means we pump in water from various pollution sources along the shoreline, including the watercourses that flow to Lake Ontario, which Line 9 crosses.

 

In its evidence to the NEB, the City of Toronto pointed out that in the event of an oil spill on Line 9 the contaminant of primary concern for drinking water treatment is benzene, a highly flammable volatile organic compound (cancer causing). Benzene is not currently removed at our water treatment plants and that means that in the event of a spill, we would have to shut off pumps at the intake to avoid bringing raw water containing benzene into our treatment plants - otherwise it will end up in our drinking water. However, the delays in detecting and containing the spill pose a very serious risk.

 

Despite the NEB's October 2014 letter expressing that it was unsatisfied with the number of shut-off valves Enbridge has and requiring that there be a shut-off valve on either side of major water-crossings, in February 2015 the NEB decided that Enbridge had satisfied Condition 16. Enbridge had made the case to the NEB that its valves were intelligently placed and that it did not need to meet the standard of automatic shut-off valves on either side of major water crossings.

 

Toronto's waterways and drinking water have been left vulnerable with this decision by the NEB.  The TRCA's evidence of exposed Line 9B pipelines across Toronto (attached) make it clear that there can be many vulnerable parts of the pipe, that are difficult for Enbridge to detect and that we need to be better prepared in the event of a leak or spill into our waterways and drinking water.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.15
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78510.pdf
(March 25, 2015) List of recent pipeline spills
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78483.pdf

Communications

(March 26, 2015) E-mail from Gerry Dunn (MM.Supp.MM5.15.1)

MM5.16 - Modernizing City By-Laws and Policies to Make Toronto More Accessible - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Shelley Carroll, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Manager to work with City divisions and stakeholders, including the Disability Issues Committee, on updating the Accessibility Design Guidelines, and report back in the third quarter of 2015. 

 

2.  City Council direct the City Manager to work with City divisions to provide a summary list of City by-laws, policies, and protocols to be audited for alignment with standards for the built environment and design of public space under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act and Building Code Act, by the second quarter of 2015.  The summary list should also include projected timelines to undertake a review of City’s by-laws, policies, and protocols to determine if updates are needed to support the City’s priorities, including enhancing accessibility.

 

3.  City Council direct the City Manager to report back on the need to undertake a City-wide review of by-laws, policies, and protocols for alignment with the areas of mandatory accessibility standards under the Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, including, but not limited to: Customer Service; Employment; Information and Communications; and Transportation.

Summary

For many people in Toronto, the City provides an abundance of opportunities and experiences free of limitations imposed upon them by the built environment. For Torontonians with disabilities, however, the built environment imposes numerous obstacles that limit their ability to moving about freely and safely without concern.

 

The City has made considerable progress in its efforts to remove barriers in the built environment including the 2004 release of the Accessibility Design Guidelines, a resource document of best practices.  However, since its release in 2004, much has changed in the world of enhancing accessibility, including public and private sector requirements under the Province’s Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act.  It is critical that in addition to the updated Accessibility Design Guidelines, the City’s by-laws, policies and procedures that impact the built environment also reflect the City’s commitment to accessibility.  An audit of relevant by-laws, policies and procedures to the built environment is one action of many to creating a barrier-free City.

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM5.16
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78511.pdf

MM5.17 - Expansion of the StART Outside the Box Program to Target Artists in Toronto's Secondary Schools - by Councillor Rob Ford, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Executive Committee. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.

Recommendations

Councillor Rob Ford, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, through the StART Outside the Box Program, to report back on the feasibility of initiating, implementing and managing a competitive "emerging artist" program at high schools across the City to paint traffic signal boxes in consultation with the respective Councillor's office, with the City bearing the cost of materials, to a maximum of $200 per box.

 

2.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to work with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships, to source corporate sponsorship to help offset the cost of materials.

 

3.  City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to work with the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, and the Director, Toronto Office of Partnerships to source corporate sponsorship to furnish a 'Best in the City' prize for the best new addition to the program each year.

Summary

The City of Toronto's StART Outside the Box Program is in place to discourage graffiti on traffic signal boxes while adding to the streetscape and community atmosphere.

 

A further goal of this project it to provide artists with an opportunity to showcase their work.

 

Some parts of the application process, specifically the requirements for finished past works, and professional references, can present a barrier to emerging artists in our schools.

 

By creating a parallel program intended specifically for the participation of secondary school students, and covering the cost of materials, we will be creating opportunities for new artists to showcase their creativity, build their portfolio, and add to their community vitality, while helping to reduce graffiti.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.17
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78512.pdf

MM5.18 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 130 Windermere Avenue by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
13 - Parkdale-High Park
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton, recommends that:

 

1.  Council authorize the City Solicitor, and other City staff as necessary, to attempt to negotiate a settlement in the appeal of the Committee of Adjustment decision A753/14EYK for 130 Windermere Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the appeal on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Ward Councillor.

 

2. In the event that settlement cannot be reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, and appropriate City Staff, as necessary, to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board in support of decision A753/14EYK of the Committee of Adjustment for 130 Windermere Avenue.

Summary

Applications were submitted to the Committee of Adjustment for minor variances for a development on lands known municipally as 130 Windermere Avenue (Application No. A753/14EYK). At a hearing on January 29, 2015 the Committee refused the minor variances, finding the requested variances did not meet the intent and purpose of either the Official Plan or Zoning By-Law, were not minor, and were not desirable for the appropriate development of the land. The owner has appealed those decisions to the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB File No PL150184).

 

Application A753/14EYK requests variances to construct a new detached dwelling with an attached garage. Variances are required under zoning by-laws 438-86 and 569-2013 and include a variance for GFA of 0.91 times the lot area whereas 0.6 times coverage is permitted, a variance for a height of 9.75m whereas 7.2m is permitted, a number of variances relating to setbacks, a variance for length, and a variance to permit a third storey.

 

City Planning staff identified concerns with the gross floor area, height, and number of storeys in a written report dated January 21, 2015. Staff recommended refusal of the application. In addition, the Swansea Area Ratepayers' Association shared their objections with the Committee of Adjustment. Accordingly, this Motion seeks to instruct staff to appear in support of the Committee of Adjustment decision.  

Background Information

Revised Member Motion MM5.18
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78513.pdf
(January 26, 2015) Letter from Councillor Sarah Doucette, Ward 13 - Parkdale - High Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78489.pdf
(January 21, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District on 130 Windermere Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78490.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Etobicoke York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 130 Windermere Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78491.pdf

MM5.19 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 133 Avondale Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

 1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding Application No. A1002/14NY respecting 133 Avondale Avenue.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a settlement in the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application No. A1002/14NY respecting 133 Avondale Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City in her discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and the Ward Councillor.

 

3.  In the event that a settlement cannot be reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary to oppose the variances requested in Application No. A1002/14NY respecting 133 Avondale Avenue.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A1002/14NY) for minor variances from Zoning By-laws 7625 and 569-2013 to permit the construction of a new second storey addition over the existing one-storey dwelling (the "Application"). 

 

At its hearing on February 19, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment approved the Application (the "Decision").  A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached. 

 

On March 11, 2015, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board in order to preserve the City's appeal rights as the appeal deadline would have passed before the next City Council meeting.

 

The variances for the proposed lot coverage of 32.8 percent are of concern, as this does not fit the character of the neighbourhood or meet the intent of the zoning by-laws. Both the variances for lot coverage and the proposed east side yard setback are of precedent-setting concern.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Decision, the authority to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants, as necessary, in order to oppose the Application, unless the applicant agrees to an acceptable lot coverage variance and a condition tying any approval to the site plans regarding the side yard setback.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board and the City Solicitor requires instructions and direction to proceed with this appeal.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.19
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78514.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 133 Avondale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78487.pdf

MM5.20 - Liquor Licence Application - 137 Peter Street - Bar Hop Brewco - Licence No. 800196 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Toronto and East York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ("AGCO") that the liquor licence application for Bar Hop Brewco (the "Premises"), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the AGCO and the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.

Summary

2441793 Ontario Inc. has submitted an application for a new liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario ("AGCO") for a premises at 137 Peter Street operating under the name Bar Hop Brewco (the "Premises"). The applicant is seeking a liquor licence for an indoor capacity of 167 patrons and an outdoor capacity of 150 patrons for a proposed roof-top patio.

 

Prior to 2015 the Premises had been operating as a nightclub and there is a long history of Liquor Licence Act (LLA) violations for the several separate licensees that have operated the Premises. These violations have resulted in several suspensions of the liquor licence.  In 1995 and 1996 a previous licensee operating the California Dream Restaurant and Nightclub at the Premises was issued two suspensions by the AGCO for 3 days each for violations of the LLA. Between 2001 and 2005 the licensee operating the Premises under the names Society Café and Budo Liquid Theatre was issued 4 separate suspensions for violations of the LLA. The suspensions ranged from 5 to 40 days. The AGCO in a decision dated December 12, 2005 decided to suspend the licence for 40 days rather than ordering a full revocation because the licence was to be transferred to a new licensee. The AGCO stated that "there is no further risk to public safety as the business would be operated by completely new management if a suspension is issued and the business is sold".

 

The subsequent licensee operated the Premises from 2006 until 2008, and on June 13, 2006 the licence was suspended for 17 days for violations of the LLA.  From 2008 until 2010 the Premises operated as Reign Lounge and more violations of the LLA resulted in three further suspensions of the licence. Up until January of this year when the licence was surrendered to the AGCO the Premises operated as Ohso Nightclub.

 

The Premises is located in the City's entertainment district among a large concentration of night clubs. It is also located near residential buildings and is in close proximately to the City's Housing Assessment and Referral Centre located at 129 Peter Street. These are sensitive uses that may be impacted by the Premises. Considering the history of problems and LLA violations at the Premises, the proximity of sensitive uses, and the proposed capacity of an outdoor roof-top patio, the application for the licence should not be granted unless suitable conditions are placed on the licence to prevent impacts on the neighbouring community.

 

This matter is deemed urgent as the placard deadline for objections was March 15, 2015.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.20
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78515.pdf

MM5.21 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing for 110 and 114 Kingsdale Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

 1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decisions regarding Application Nos. B069/14NY, A906/14NY, and A907/14NY0 respecting 110 and 114 Kingsdale Avenue.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a settlement in the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application Nos. B069/14NY, A906/14NY, and A907/14NY respecting 110 and 114 Kingsdale Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Ward Councillor.

 

3.  In the event that a settlement cannot be reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary to oppose the proposed consent and variances requested in Application Nos. B069/14NY, A906/14NY, and A907/14NY respecting 110 and 114 Kingsdale Avenue.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application Nos. B069/14NY, A906/14NY, and A907/14NY) to obtain consent to sever the properties at 110 and 114 Kingsdale Avenue into two undersized residential lots and for minor variances from Zoning By-laws 7625 and 569-2013 to permit the construction of a new two-storey dwelling with an integral garage on each of the proposed severed lots (the "Applications"). 

 

At its hearing on February 19, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment approved the Applications with conditions (the "Decisions").  Copies of the Notices of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment are attached. 

 

On March 11, 2015, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board in order to preserve the City's appeal rights as the appeal deadline would have passed before the next City Council meeting.

 

The variances to permit a proposed lot coverage of 32.1 percent remain of concern and should be decreased.  As requested, the lot coverage variances do not fit the character of the neighbourhood or meet the intent of the zoning by-laws.  Approval of these variances could risk setting a precedent for future applications.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Decisions, to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants, as necessary, in order to oppose the Applications, unless the applicant agrees to an acceptable decrease of the variance for lot coverage.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board and the City Solicitor requires instructions and direction to proceed with this appeal.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.21
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78516.pdf
(February 13, 2015) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on 110 Kingsdale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78496.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Consent for 110 and 114 Kingsdale Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78497.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 110 and 114 Kingsdale Avenue (Parts 1 and 2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78498.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 110 and 114 Kingsdale Avenue (Parts 3 and 4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78499.pdf

MM5.22 - Removal of Matter from Committee - Final Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - 4841 to 4881 Yonge Street, 2 & 50 Sheppard Avenue East, 2, 4 & 6 Forest Laneway -by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Maria Augimeri

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* The North York Community Council currently has jurisdiction for this subject matter. A two-thirds vote is required to remove Item NY4.24 from Community Council jurisdiction.

The Director, Community Planning, North York District has submitted a supplementary report on this Item (MM5.22a with recommendations)

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Maria Augimeri, recommends that:

 

1.  In accordance with Section 27-60 of Chapter 27, Council Procedures, City Council remove Item NY4.24 from the North York Community Council and bring the Item forward for consideration by City Council at the March 31 and April 1, 2015 meeting.

Summary

The North York Community Council held a statutory public meeting on February 18, 2015 and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.  North York Community Council deferred Item NY4.24, headed "Final Report - Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan and Rental Housing Demolition Applications - 4841 to 4881 Yonge Street, 2 and 50 Sheppard Avenue East, 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway".

 

The Item was deferred for not later than two meetings (May 12, 2015), to allow the applicant an opportunity to include social facilities within the proposed development and to address the concerns presented by area residents and the Toronto Catholic District School Board, with the understanding that the matter could be brought forward to the next meeting of the North York Community Council on April 14, 2015, if there is a proposal agreed upon by City Planning staff, the applicant and the Ward Councillor.

 

Subsequent to the North York Community Council meeting, the applicant met with the Ward Councillor.  The discussions have resulted in the modification of the application to include significant community amenities.  Planning staff are preparing a report detailing these modifications for the consideration of Council.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.22
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78517.pdf
(March 31, 2015) Supplementary Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on 4841 to 4881 Yonge Street, 2 and 50 Sheppard Avenue East, 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan and Rental Housing Demolition Applications (MM5.22a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78709.pdf

MM5.23 - 330 Byng Avenue - Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding Application No. A1010/14NY respecting 330 Byng Avenue.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a settlement in the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application No. A1010/14NY respecting 330 Byng Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City at the City Solicitor's discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Ward Councillor.

 

3.  In the event that a settlement cannot be reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary to oppose the variances requested in Application No. A1010/14NY respecting 330 Byng Avenue.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A1010/14NY) for minor variances from Zoning By-laws 7625 and 569-2013 to permit the construction of a new two-storey dwelling with an integral garage at 330 Byng Avenue (the "Application"). 

 

At its hearing on February 19, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment approved the Application (the "Decision").  A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached.

 

On March 11, 2015, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board in order to preserve the City's appeal rights as the appeal deadline would have passed before the next City Council meeting.

 

The variances for the east side yard setback of 0.91 metres remain of concern and should be increased.  As requested, the east side yard setback variances do not fit the character of the neighbourhood or meet the intent of the zoning by-laws.  Approval of these variances could risk setting a precedent for future applications.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Decision, the authority to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary in order to oppose the Application, unless the applicant agrees to an acceptable increase of the variance for the east side yard setback.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board and requires instructions and direction to proceed with this appeal.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.23
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78518.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 330 Byng Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78495.pdf

MM5.24 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of the Committee of Adjustment Decision for 13 Pine Ridge Drive - by Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
36 - Scarborough Southwest
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Scarborough Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor Gary Crawford, seconded by Councillor Michael Thompson, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment decision granting variances for 13 Pine Ridge Drive.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the variances sought for 13 Pine Ridge Drive and authorize the City Solicitor to retain an outside planning consultant, as necessary.

Summary

On February 19, 2015 the application for a minor variance to severe the property at 13 Pine Ridge Drive (B050/14SC, A286/14SC, A287/14SC, A288/14SC) was approved, subject to certain conditions by the Scarborough Committee of Adjustment. The applicant sought consent to sever the land into three lots for single family houses. The proposed Lot Division Plan was as follows: Part 1: Proposed frontage of 25.8 m and lot area of approximately 2,842 m2 Part 2: Proposed frontage of 26.33 m and lot area of 3,896 m2 Part 3: Proposed frontage of 25.13 m and lot area of 2,800 m2 Part 4: Land proposed to be conveyed to the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority.

 

The approved variance is not in keeping with the characteristics of the immediate neighbourhood which reflect estate style lots. There are no other examples of severances on this street. Allowing the severance decision to stand would be precedent setting. There was a previous decision at the Ontario Municipal Board upholding an appeal to a severance at 40 Pine Ridge Drive.

 

As well, there are objections from the immediate neighbours and I have heard from a number of residents in the area that they do not support the severance.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.24
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78540.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Committee of Adjustment, Scarborough Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 13 Pine Ridge Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78500.pdf

MM5.25 - 153 Parkview Avenue - Request for Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc

Notice of Motion
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
23 - Willowdale
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has been given.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the North York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion relates to an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing and has been deemed urgent.

Recommendations

Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the Committee of Adjustment's decision regarding Application Nos. B070/14NY, A912/14NY, and A913/14NY respecting 153 Parkview Avenue.

 

2.  City Council direct the City Solicitor to attempt to negotiate a settlement in the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application Nos. B070/14NY, A912/14NY, and A913/14NY respecting 153 Parkview Avenue and authorize the City Solicitor to settle the matter on behalf of the City in her discretion after consultation with the Chief Planner and Ward Councillor.

 

3.  In the event that a settlement cannot be reached, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary in order to oppose the proposed consent and variances requested in Application Nos. B070/14NY, A912/14NY, and A913/14NY respecting 153 Parkview Avenue.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application Nos. B070/14NY, A912/14NY, and A913/14NY) for a consent and minor variances from Zoning By-laws 7625 and 569-2013 to permit a severance of the subject property into two undersized lots and the construction of two new residential dwellings (the "Applications").

 

At its hearing on February 19, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment approved the Applications (the "Decisions"). Copies of the Notices of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment are attached.

 

On March 11, 2015, the City Solicitor appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board in order to preserve the City's appeal rights as the appeal deadline would have passed before the next City Council meeting

 

The variances for the proposed side yard setbacks are of concern, as they do not fit the character of the neighbourhood or meet the intent of the zoning by-laws.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor authority to appeal the Decisions.  This Motion would also give the City Solicitor authority to attend the Ontario Municipal Board and to retain outside consultants as necessary in order to oppose the Applications, unless the applicant agrees to acceptable side yard setback variances.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the City Solicitor has already appealed the Committee of Adjustment's Decision to the Ontario Municipal Board and requires instructions and direction to proceed with this appeal.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.25
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78542.pdf
(February 19, 2015) Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel Notice of Decision on Consent and Minor Variance/Permission (Parts 1 and 2) for 153 Parkview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78504.pdf
(February 13, 2015) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on 153 Parkview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78505.pdf

MM5.26 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decision Respecting 6921 Steeles Avenue West, Unit 8 - by Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
1 - Etobicoke North
Attention
* Notice of this Motion has not been given. A two-thirds vote is required to waive notice.
* This Motion is subject to referral to the Etobicoke York Community Council. A two-thirds vote is required to waive referral.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.

Recommendations

Councillor Vincent Crisanti, seconded by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board in support of the Committee of Adjustment Decisions to refuse the consent and minor variances (A581/14EYK) for 6921 Steeles Avenue West, Unit 8 and to retain an independent land use planner if necessary.

Summary

The owners of the land municipally known as 6921 Steeles Ave W, Unit 8, applied to the Committee of Adjustment to obtain consent and minor variance (Application A581/14EYK) for a parking deficiency and in order to permit non-permitted use in the E1 and I.C2 Zones.

 

On November 13, 2014, the Committee refused the consent and minor variances.

 

There are concerns that the variances are not in keeping with the intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, and that the proposed parking variances are out of keeping with the existing requirements.

 

This Motion is urgent as the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing on this matter is scheduled before the next City Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.26
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78650.pdf
Etobicoke York District Committee of Adjustment - Notice of Decision on minor variance for 6921 Steeles Avenue West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78651.pdf

MM5.27 - AGCO Liquor Licence Application - 232 Queen Street West "Queen Street Warehouse" - File No. 280357 - by Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
20 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Joe Cressy, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tram, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for the premises at 232 Queen Street West, operating under the name "Queen Street Warehouse" ("Premises"), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.

 

2.  City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.

 

3.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and direct the City Solicitor to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

Summary

Queen Street Warehouse Restaurant Ltd. has submitted an application for a liquor licence to the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) for the premises at 232 Queen Street West, operating under the name "Queen Street Warehouse" (“Premises”). The application is to increase the outdoor patio from the existing licensed capacity of 38 persons to 54 persons.

 

The Premises are located in close proximity to residential properties. There are concerns with respect to noise, litter, safety, lighting and other potential disturbances to residents in the area.

 

This application for a liquor licence is not in the public interest unless certain conditions, addressing the concerns of the community, are attached to the licence. The Registrar of the AGCO should be requested to issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application. 

 

The City needs to file its objection to the liquor licence application as soon as possible because there is a deadline and also to be able to participate in any hearing in this matter. It is urgent that Council consider this matter at this Council meeting. 

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.27
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78745.pdf

MM5.28 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds from 5055 Dundas Street West to Economic Development and Culture for the Public Art Project - Mimico Creek located Dundas Sreet and Islington Avenue - by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, seconded by Councillor John Campbell

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano, seconded by Councillor John Campbell, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council increase the approved 2015 Capital Budget for Economic Development and Culture by $76,294.74 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 funds obtained in the development at 5055 Dundas Street West (source account: XR3026-3700253) to fund the public artwork Mimico Creek  capital account CAC093-06.

Summary

Section 37 funds have been secured and received in connection with the development at 5055 Dundas Street West for various community benefits including a cash contribution of $425,000.00 to be utilized for affordable housing and public art. These funds have been received by the City and interest has accrued. A total of $150,000 has been spent capital improvements to Toronto Community Housing Corporation facilities in the Ward, resulting $76,294.74 available for public art.

 

Authority is being sought for an increase to the Economic Development and Culture Division's approved 2015 Capital Budget by $76,294.74 gross, $0 net, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits to provide one-time funding for capital improvements to the public artwork Mimico Creek project which will be located at Dundas Street and Islington Avenue.

 

This significant public artwork by the artist, Noel Harding, is of great importance to the Islington Neighbourhood and The Village of Islington. This unique sculpture will create an impressive gateway to The Islington Village Shopping district.  Economic Development and Culture have been developing this project for two and a half years and these funds will ensure its enhancement and completion.

 

At this time the Purchase Order Amendment is being drawn up for the enhancements. This will  facilitate the execution of final construction drawings and occupancy permits for construction. The construction deadline for this job start is mid-August; therefore the motion is very time sensitive.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.28
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78746.pdf
(April 1, 2015) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78769.pdf

MM5.29 - 296 Crawford Street - Request for City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Joe Cressy, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate City Planning Staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board on the appeal of Committee of Adjustment Application No. A0922/13TEY respecting 296 Crawford Street and to request the Ontario Municipal Board, in the event that the Board is inclined to grant the variances, to impose the conditions set out in the Planning Report dated November 7, 2014.

Summary

The applicant applied to the Committee of Adjustment (Application No. A0922/13TEY) for minor variances from Zoning By-law 439-86 to legalize and maintain an existing basement dwelling unit in a converted row house.  The applicant also proposes to construct a rear second storey addition and a rear third storey addition with a rear third floor deck (the "Application").

 

At its hearing on November 19, 2014, the Committee of Adjustment refused the Application.  In the opinion of the Committee of Adjustment the Application did not maintain the general intent and purpose of the Official Plan or the Zoning By-law, the variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land, and the variances were not considered minor.  A copy of the Notice of Decision of the Committee of Adjustment is attached.   

 

The applicant has appealed the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the Application to the Ontario Municipal Board.  The hearing date has been scheduled for April 30, 2015. 

 

City Planning Staff, in their report dated November 7, 2014, (the "Planning Report") expressed concern with the size and scale of the proposed third floor addition and rear third floor deck.  In the opinion of City Planning Staff, the proposed third floor addition will disrupt the prevailing pattern on the street and will lead to overdevelopment.  The Planning Report recommended that, if the Application is approved, conditions should be imposed requiring the applicant to remove the proposed third floor addition from the plans and provide permanent opaque screening or fencing along the north and south edges of the proposed rear third floor deck to a minimum height of 1.5 metres from the floor of the proposed rear third floor deck.

 

This Motion would give the City Solicitor and appropriate City Planning Staff the authority to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing for this matter to request that, if the Ontario Municipal Board is inclined to grant the variances, the conditions set out in the Planning Report be imposed.

 

This matter is time sensitive and urgent as the Application has already been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board and a hearing date is set.  This session of City Council is the last opportunity for the City Solicitor to obtain instructions regarding this matter prior to the scheduled hearing date. 

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.29
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78743.pdf
Minutes of the Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 296 Crawford Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78742.pdf

MM5.30 - 36 Delaware Avenue - Request for City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Sarah Doucette, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the City Solicitor, appropriate staff, and outside planning experts as required, to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board to support the Toronto and East York Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the application for variances for 36 Delaware Avenue.

Summary

At the hearing on January 14, 2015, the Committee of Adjustment refused Application No.

A0198/14TEY respecting 36 Delaware Avenue and a request to alter the existing three-storey semi-detached dwelling containing 3 units by constructing a rear deck to the second storey.

 

Based on the requested variances, in the opinion of the Committee the application did not meet the general intent of the Official Plan or the Zoning By-law.  The variances were not considered desirable for the appropriate development of the land and the variances were not considered minor.

 

The applicant has appealed the refusal of the Committee of Adjustment to the Ontario

Municipal Board. The hearing date has been scheduled for June 3, 2015.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.30
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78744.pdf
Committee of Adjustment, Toronto and East York Panel Notice of Decision on application for Minor Variance/Permission for 36 Delaware Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78740.pdf

MM5.31 - Proposed Adjustment to Residential Rental Demolition Conditions - 31 Roehampton Avenue - Residential Rental Demolition Application Under Municipal Code Chapter 667 - by Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
22 - St. Paul's
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Josh Matlow, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend Part 2 of Item TE34.21, adopted as amended by Council at its meeting dated August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014, by deleting Part 2c. and replacing it with the following condition:

 

"2c.  Not earlier than the issuance of a permit providing for the excavation and shoring of the lot."

 

2.  City Council determine that no further notice is required to be given in respect of these changes under Municipal Code Chapter 667 under the City of Toronto Act, 2006. 

Summary

On August 25, 26, 27 and 28, 2014, City Council adopted Item TE34.21.  That resolution approved an application to demolish a 3-storey apartment building containing 35 residential rental units at 31 Roehampton Avenue, under Chapter 667 of the Toronto Municipal Code, pursuant to Section 111 of the City of Toronto Act. The 35 rental units are to be replaced within a proposed new building on the lands at 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue and at 31 Roehampton Avenue. The property at 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue is part of a previous (2013) Council approval of an application for the rezoning and demolition and replacement of 30 rental housing units for the "e-condos" site located at 2263–2287 Yonge Street, 10 Eglinton Avenue East and 25 and 25R Roehampton Avenue.  The consolidated properties will provide for the demolition and replacement of 35 mid-range residential rental units in the approved development.

 

In addition to the rental housing demolition application, the proposed new building at 25 to 31 Roehampton Avenue has been redesigned and received approval by the Committee of Adjustment for minor variances to the site specific by-law (1109-2013) on November 19, 2014.

 

As a precondition of the issuance of the Preliminary Approval for the Section 111 demolition permit for 31 Roehampton Avenue, the owner is required to meet a number of conditions, including the reissuance of Notice of Approval Conditions for site plan approval from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning or her designate, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006.   The purpose of this Motion is to remove the requirement of the reissued Notice of Approval Conditions and to replace it with the requirement of the excavation and shoring permits, as the first permits on the lot, to have been issued.  The change of the timing of this permit is required to allow for the timely excavation of the lot so as to not interfere with a major public work, the Yonge and Eglinton Crosstown, which will have time and construction sensitive constraints.  Policy Planning staff have been consulted on this change and feel that an earlier demolition is appropriate on this site.

 

This Motion is proposed on an urgent basis to permit the demolition of the 3-storey walk-up apartment building 31 Roehampton Avenue, as the building is vacant and the remainder of the buildings on the "e-condos" site located at 2263–2287 Yonge Street, 10 Eglinton Avenue East and 25-25R Roehampton Avenue have been demolished and construction has commenced.  The vacant building on the 31 Roehampton Avenue needs to be demolished now to allow the excavation and subsequent construction of the “e-condos” development to proceed as quickly as possible.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.31
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78747.pdf

MM5.32 - Amending the Composition of the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council - by Councillor Mike Layton, Councillor Gary Crawford

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
19 - Trinity-Spadina
Attention
* This Motion is subject to a re-opening of EX2.1. A two-thirds vote is required to re-open that Item. If re-opened, the previous Council decision remains in force unless Council decides otherwise.
* This Motion has been deemed urgent and has been added to the agenda.

Recommendations

Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council amend the Terms of Reference for the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council by increasing the composition of the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council by three (3) additional Councillor positions so that the composition is up to 36 members.

Summary

City Council at its February 10 and 11, 2015 meeting, adopted as amended, Item EX2.1 and established the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council.  The Advisory Council's composition is up to 33 members, including three Members of Council, including the Chair of the Economic Development Committee and at least one other member of the Economic Development Committee to be appointed on the recommendation of the Striking Committee.

 

The Striking Committee's recommendation to appoint Members of Council is before City Council at this meeting as Item ST3.1.

 

In recognition of the tremendous interest in the Toronto Music Industry, Council would benefit from the addition of another three Council Member positions on the Advisory Council.

 

This matter is urgent as the appointment of Council Members is before the March 31 and April 1, 2015 Council meeting. 

 

REQUIRES RE-OPENING: 

 

Item EX2.1 headed "Council Advisory Bodies for the 2014 to 2018 Term of City Council" adopted by City Council on February 10 and 11, 2015, only as it pertains to the number of Council Member positions on the Toronto Music Industry Advisory Council, in order to consider increasing the composition.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.32
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78730.pdf

MM5.33 - Metrolinx Go Train Bridge Plan - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
18 - Davenport
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Recommendations

Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, to ensure that land-use planning (including grade separation underground or above ground) and urban design considerations are par‎t of the EA process being carried out by Metrolinx for the rail grade separation project at Dupont St. and Lansdowne Avenue.

Summary

Metrolinx is embarking on a Environmental ‎Assessment study for a rail grade separation project in the area between Dupont Street and Davenport Road just west of Lansdowne Avenue.  The proposed project may include building a 1.5 kilometre bridge to carry Metrolinx's Barrie GO train line over the Canadian Pacific railway, a busy freight line.

 

Due to its height and bulk, this proposed bridge will create a significant impact on the surrounding, largely residential, neighbourhoods. The appropriate planning of this infrastructure must include measures to mitigate these impacts.

 

The City of Toronto has invested heavily in the communities that would be affected by this proposal, including land revitalization through local parks and new community services in the surrounding neighbourhoods. As a result, City Planning has a critical role in diagnosing the potential impact to resident and community interests within the EA process, as well as identifying urban design opportunities afforded through the proposal.

 

Among the significant concerns directly affecting city and community interests as a result of this proposal are: vibration, community division, land-use, visual/aesthetic issues, compromised land development opportunities and public safety concerns.

 

The process which Metrolinx is currently engaged in is designed to determine the most appropriate option to accomplish its Provincial transportation mandate. The interests of Toronto’s community planning, however, are best represented by City staff’s involvement in this process.

 

Should, upon a fulsome and accurate understanding of these city impacts, the EA process conclude the Davenport Diamond is the most appropriate option, City staff must have an opportunity to identify what new measures can be invoked to mitigate negative community impacts and foster better use of the transformed landscape.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.33
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78729.pdf

MM5.34 - Appeal of City Council's passage of By-law No. 277-2015 with respect to the properties municipally known as 1, 9 & 11 Bloor Street West and 768, 770, 774, 774 ½, 776, 780, 782 & 784 Yonge Street - Request for directions - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon

Motion without Notice
Consideration Type:
ACTION
Ward:
27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
Attention
* This Motion has been deemed urgent by the Chair.
* This Motion is not subject to a vote to waive referral. This Motion has been added to the agenda and is before Council for debate.

Bill 384 has been submitted on this Item.

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and this report contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege

Recommendations

Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, recommends that:

 

1.  City Council adopt the report (April 1, 2015) from the City Solicitor.

Summary

At its meeting of February 10 and 11, 2015, City Council considered and adopted item MM3.38, on a by-law to designate a heritage conservation district study area pursuant to Section 40.1 of the Ontario Heritage Act and enacted By-law No. 277-2015. 

 

This Motion is brought forward on an urgent basis as staff requires Council's direction at this Council meeting.

Background Information

Member Motion MM5.34
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78738.pdf
(April 1, 2015) Report from the City Solicitor on Appeal of City Council's passage of By-law No. 277-2015 with respect to the properties municipally known as 1, 9 & 11 Bloor Street West and 768, 770, 774, 774 ½, 776, 780, 782 & 784 Yonge Street - Request for directions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-78739.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Appendix A - made public on April 13, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-79011.pdf
Confidential Appendix B - made public on April 13, 2015
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-79012.pdf

Bills and By-laws - Meeting 5

BL5.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills

Consideration Type:
ACTION
Wards:
All

Summary

City Council will introduce and enact General Bills and Confirming Bills.

 

Updated Bills Index for March 31 and April 1, 2015 City Council Meeting

(http://app.toronto.ca/tmmis/viewBillBylaw.do?meeting=2015.CC5)

 

Background Information

(April 9, 2015) Consolidated By-law Index for March 31, April 1 and 2, 2015 City Council meeting
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-78927.htm
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council