Decisions
City Council
- Meeting No.:
- 14
- Contact:
- Marilyn Toft, Manager
- Meeting Date:
- Tuesday, November 29, 2011
- Wednesday, November 30, 2011
- Thursday, December 1, 2011
- Phone:
- 416-392-7032
- Start Time:
- 9:30 AM
- E-mail:
- clerk@toronto.ca
- Location:
- Council Chamber, City Hall
City Council - Routine Matters - Meeting 14
RM14.1 - Call to Order
- Decision Type:
- Presentation
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
CALL TO ORDER – 9:38 a.m.
Speaker Nunziata took the Chair and called the Members to order.
The meeting opened with O Canada.
November 29, 2011
Members of Council observed a moment of silence and remembered the following persons who passed away:
Jenna Katherine Morrison
Dr. Fraser Mustard
Tadeusz Sawicz
Sheila Thibaudeau Lambrinos
Charles (Butch) Windsor.
November 30, 2011
Members of Council observed a moment of silence and remembered the following persons who passed away:
Sylvia Klibingaitis.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42599.pdf
Condolence Motion for Dr. Fraser Mustard
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42600.pdf
Condolence Motion for Tadeusz Sawicz
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42601.pdf
Condolence Motion for Sheila Thibaudeau Lambrinos
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42602.pdf
Condolence Motion for Charles (Butch) Windsor
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42603.pdf
Condolence Motion for Sylvia Klibingaitis
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42807.pdf
RM14.2 - Confirmation of Minutes
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council confirmed the Minutes of Council from the regular meeting held on October 24 and 25, 2011, in the form supplied to the Members.
RM14.3 - Introduction of Committee Reports and New Business from the Mayor and City Officials
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
Committee Reports and New Business items were presented to City Council for consideration.
RM14.4 - Petitions
- Decision Type:
- Information
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, received the following petitions for information:
a. (November 29, 2011) petition submitted by Councillor Josh Colle, Ward 15 – Eglinton-Lawrence, containing names of approximately 600 persons, respecting Item NY11.24, the Lawrence Allen Secondary Plan.
b. (November 29, 2011) petition submitted by Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby, Ward 4 - Etobicoke Centre, containing names of approximately 8,000 persons, respecting protecting Arts funding to keep Toronto vibrant.
c. (November 30, 2011) petition submitted by Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby, Ward 4 - Etobicoke Centre containing names of approximately 12,000 persons, respecting protecting Arts funding to keep Toronto vibrant.
RM14.5 - Presentations, Introductions and Announcements
- Decision Type:
- Presentation
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
Various presentations, introductions and announcements were made to City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
November 29, 2011:
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, invited City Manager Joe Pennachetti to come forward to address Council to recognize Lou Pagano, Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division, on his retirement from the City of Toronto. Mr. Pennachetti spoke of Mr. Pagano's more than 30 years of service, and thanked and congratulated Mr. Pagano. Mr. Pennachetti invited Mr. Pagano and Mayor Ford to come forward and Mayor Ford presented a retirement scroll to Mr. Pagano to mark the occasion.
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, invited Mayor Ford to come forward to address Council to recognize the various City of Toronto staff for their efforts with the closure of the Occupy Toronto movement in St. James Park. Mayor Ford acknowledged the staff present in the Chamber thanked them for their hard work.
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, invited Mayor Ford to come forward to address Council in recognition of "Movember." Mayor Ford called upon all Councillors who participated in this effort to join him. Mayor Ford spoke about how this initiative increases awareness of prostate cancer and helps to educate and prevent the disease. Mayor Ford proclaimed November 2011 as "Movember" in the City of Toronto and Councillor Layton announced that $10,000 has been raised by the Councillors' efforts.
Councillor Pasternak, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed the representatives of Ward 10's longest standing ratepayers association, The Armour Gardens Community Association present in the Chamber, and congratulated them on celebrating their 60th year. Councillor Pasternak paid tribute to the two generations of residents who have given their time to the public good with their commitment to social activism and community involvement.
Councillor Wong-Tam, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed students and educators from the Language Instruction for Newcomers to Canada (LINC) Program to the Chamber.
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed 20 senior public servants from the Zhejiang (China) Provincial Auditor's office, present in the Chamber, who are on a two-month training program with York University. The officials were attending Council to learn more about municipal government.
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed the Grade 5 students from Queen Victoria Junior Public School, who were in attendance to learn more about municipal government.
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, acknowledged City Councillor Paul Pugh from the City of Thunder Bay and welcomed Councillor Pugh to the Chamber.
Speaker Nunziata, during the afternoon session of the meeting, welcomed the Grade 10 students from Martingrove Collegiate Institute, who were in attendance to learn more about municipal government.
Speaker Nunziata, during the afternoon session of the meeting, welcomed the 62nd Toronto Sparks Girl Guides to the Chamber. The Sparks were in attendance to learn more about municipal government.
November 30, 2011:
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, invited Mayor Ford to come forward to address Council to recognize the Toronto Emergency Medical Services (EMS) winning team for their achievements at the 2011 International Trauma Life Support Patient Care Competition. Mayor Ford commended Shamez Kassam, Lorne Burns, Martin Johnston, and Ron Kowalik on their achievements at the competition and presented them with a scroll to mark the occasion.
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, invited Mayor Ford to come forward to address Council to recognize the Junior and Senior Football Champions, the Don Bosco Eagles Junior Team from Don Bosco Catholic Secondary School and the Northern Secondary Red Knights Senior Team from Northern Secondary School. Mayor Ford congratulated the teams and their coaches on their victories and presented the coaches with a scroll and the team members with a commemorative football to mark the occasion.
Speaker Nunziata, during the morning session of the meeting, welcomed the Grade 5 students from Associated Hebrew School, who were in attendance to learn more about municipal government.
Councillor Wong-Tam, during the afternoon session of the meeting, addressed Council to acknowledge November 30th as World Aids Day. Councillor Wong-Tam asked Members of City Council to remember the 18,000 Torontonians living with HIV, and continue to support the programs for both treating and preventing HIV. Councillor Wong-Tam invited all Members of Council to attend events being held throughout the City this week.
Speaker Nunziata, during the afternoon session of the meeting, welcomed the Grade 10 students from Martingrove Collegiate Institute, who were in attendance to learn more about municipal government.
Councillor De Baeremaeker, during the afternoon session of the meeting, thanked all the Members of Council who had attended his 50th birthday celebration earlier that day and invited Members and staff to share his birthday cake. Mayor Ford, on behalf of the Members of City Council, wished Councillor De Baeremaeker a very happy birthday.
Mayor Ford, during the afternoon session of the meeting, advised City Council that Ms. Adrienne Batra, the Mayor's Press Secretary, was leaving the City of Toronto to pursue a position with the Toronto Sun/CFRB. Mayor Ford spoke of Ms. Batra's hard work and loyalty and invited the Members of Council to attend a reception in her honour.
December 1, 2011:
Councillor McMahon, during the morning session of the meeting, addressed City Council to acknowledge that December 1st is the one-year anniversary of the First Council meeting of the term. Councillor McMahon congratulated the Members and asked that everyone show each other respect to build a better City.
RM14.6 - Review of the Order Paper
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
November 29, 2011:
City Council adopted the November 29, 2011 Order Paper, as amended, and all other Items not held on consent.
November 30, 2011:
City Council adopted the November 30, 2011 Order Paper.
December 1, 2011:
City Council adopted the December 1, 2011 Order Paper, as amended.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42604.pdf
November 30, 2011 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42716.pdf
December 1, 2011 Order Paper
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/rm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42772.pdf
City Council - Administrative Inquiries and Answers - Meeting 14
IA14.1 - Toronto Transit Infrastructure Limited and Related Issues
- Decision Type:
- Information
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council, on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, received Administrative Inquiry IA14.1 from Councillor Joe Mihevc, Ward 21, St. Paul's, regarding Toronto Transit Infrastructure Limited and related issues, and Answer IA14.1a from the City Manager, for information.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-42459.pdf
(June 2011) Report from the President and Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Infrastructure Limited
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-42460.pdf
(November 25, 2011) Answer from the City Manager (IA14.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-42561.pdf
Communications (City Council)
IA14.2 - Broader Service and Organizational Studies approved in the Core Service Review Report
- Decision Type:
- Information
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council, on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, received Administrative Inquiry IA14.2 from Councillor Janet Davis, Ward 31, Beaches-East York, regarding broader service and organizational studies approved in the Core Service Review Report, and Answer IA14.2a from the City Manager, for information.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-42462.pdf
(November 24, 2011) Answer from the City Manager (IA14.2a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-42562.pdf
IA14.3 - Priority Centres and Welcome Policy
- Decision Type:
- Information
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council, on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, received Administrative Inquiry IA14.3 from Councillor Janet Davis, Ward 31, Beaches-East York, regarding priority centres and the welcome policy, and Answer IA14.3a from the City Manager, for information.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-42466.pdf
(November 29, 2011) Answer from the City Manager (IAI4.3a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ia/bgrd/backgroundfile-42621.pdf
City Council - Deferred Item - Meeting 14
TE9.11 - Request for Direction Report - 500 Lake Shore Boulevard West - Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Control Applications
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, deferred consideration of Item TE9.11 to the next regular City Council meeting on February 6 and 7, 2012.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-39899.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
Executive Committee - Meeting 12
EX12.1 - Proposed Directives to Toronto Hydro Regarding Anemometer in Lake Ontario
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council, as Shareholder, direct Toronto Hydro to cause its subsidiary, Toronto Hydro Energy Services, to complete the testing program for the Wind Anemometer in Lake Ontario by the Fall of 2012, and that there be no extension to the program.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41839.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Sherri Lange (EX.Main.EX12.1.2)
EX12.2 - Sponsorships and Naming Rights: Partnership Policies to Promote and Recognize Contributions to the City
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Section 6.1, Naming of Properties and Streets, of Appendix 3 to the report (October 14, 2011) from the City Manager, by adding the Criteria for Name Selection set out in the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy, so that the Section now reads:
"6.1 Naming of Properties and Streets
6.1.1 In line with current practice, for the naming of ward-specific properties and streets, division staff shall only recommend names that:
- after consulting with the local community and councillor, are determined to have general public support;
- engender a strong positive image;
- have historical, cultural or social significance to the community, City or nation;
- are unique, to avoid confusion;
- do not lend themselves to inappropriate abbreviations or acronyms; and
- comply with this policy;
6.1.2 Streets should generally be named after people, places, events and things related to the City and citizens of Toronto. Proposed names should meet one of the following criteria:
a. to honour and commemorate noteworthy persons associated with the City of Toronto;
b. to commemorate local history, places, events or culture;
c. to strengthen neighbourhood identity; or
d. to recognize native wildlife, flora, fauna or natural features related to the community and the City of Toronto.
6.1.3. Consideration should be given to names of local area or historic significance.
6.1.4 Names of living persons should be used only in exceptional circumstances.
6.1.5 Only a person’s last name should be used as a street name unless additional identification is necessary to prevent a duplication with an existing street name in Toronto and surrounding municipalities.
6.1.6 Upon concluding its due diligence, the division will report to the relevant Community Council with the recommended name."
2. City Council amend Appendix 1 - City of Toronto Sponsorship Policy, to the report (October 14, 2011) from the City Manager as follows:
a. Amend Section 5.2.1 to be consistent with the Naming Policy by adding the words: "The City reserves the right to refuse any proposal, including, but not limited to, those submitted by third parties whose activities are perceived to be incompatible with the City's goals, values or mission.",
so that Section 5.2.1 now reads:
"5.2.1 The City will consider all sponsorship proposals but has no obligation to accept any of them. The City reserves the right to refuse any proposal, including, but not limited to, those submitted by third parties whose activities are perceived to be incompatible with the City's goals, values or mission."
b. Amend Section 6.8 so that it now reads:
"6.8 The recipient division is to notify the local councillor when a ward-specific sponsorship is being considered."
c. Add to the end of Section 6.9 the following new paragraph:
"Sponsorship and naming agreements are to be made available to the public".
3. City Council amend the statements respecting the application of the policies to the City's ABCs contained in Section 3.3 of the Sponsorship Policy in Appendix 1, Section 3.4 of the Property Naming Rights Policy in Appendix 2, and Section 3.3 in the Honourific and Street Naming Policy in Appendix 3 by:
a. Adding the words "by requiring that those ABCs adopt policies which are consistent with this policy. Approval of proposals would continue to be by the ABC or, if such authority is not delegated to the ABC, by City Council."; and
b. Making clear that the authority for street naming shall remain solely with the City,
So that those provisions now read as follows:
Sponsorship Policy:
3.3 For purposes of corporate consistency, this policy shall apply to all City divisions and to those agencies, boards and commissions (ABCs) which are by law subject to the policies of City Council by requiring that those ABCs adopt policies which are consistent with this policy. Approval of proposals would continue to be by the ABC or, if such authority is not delegated to the ABC, by City Council. All other ABCs are requested to adopt policies which are consistent with this policy. This policy shall not apply to boards of management for business improvement areas."
Property Naming Rights Policy:
"3.4 For purposes of corporate consistency, this policy shall apply to all City divisions and to those agencies, boards and commissions (ABCs) which are by law subject to the policies of City Council by requiring that those ABCs adopt policies which are consistent with this policy. Approval of proposals would continue to be by the ABC or, if such authority is not delegated to the ABC, by City Council. All other ABCs are requested to adopt policies which are consistent with this policy. This policy shall not apply to boards of management for business improvement areas."
Honourific and Street Naming Policy:
"3.3 For purposes of corporate consistency, this policy shall apply to all City divisions and to those agencies, boards and commissions (ABCs) which are by law subject to the policies of City Council by requiring that those ABCs adopt policies which are consistent with this policy. Approval of proposals would continue to be by the ABC or, if such authority is not delegated to the ABC, by City Council. All other ABCs are requested to adopt policies which are consistent with this policy. The authority for street naming under this policy shall remain solely with the City."
4. City Council adopt the policies, as amended, contained in the following attachments to the report (October 14, 2011) from the City Manager:
a. Appendix 1 – City of Toronto Sponsorship Policy, as amended by Parts 2 and 3 above.
b. Appendix 2 – City of Toronto Property Naming Rights Policy, as amended by Part 3 above.
c. Appendix 3 – City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy, as amended by Parts 1 and 3 above.
5. City Council request the Director of the Toronto Office of Partnerships, in conjunction with the relevant City divisions, and in consultation with the BIAs, to identify appropriate properties for potential naming rights.
6. City Council request the Director of the Toronto Office of Partnerships to consult with relevant internal and external stakeholders, including BIAs, for the purposes of establishing guidelines for the valuation of City properties that may be leveraged for sponsorships and naming rights.
7. City Council delegate authority to Division Heads to accept and enter into sponsorship agreements and to spend received funds in accordance with Appendix 1, as amended, of the report (October 14, 2011) from the City Manager, and that the City of Toronto’s Municipal Code be amended accordingly.
8. City Council amend the Council Procedures to expand the delegation of authority to community councils to include the authority to name City properties in compliance with City policies.
9. City Council authorize the introduction of the necessary bills to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41840.pdf
(October 14, 2011) Appendix 1 to the staff report - City of Toronto Sponsorship Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41841.pdf
(October 14, 2011) Appendix 2 to the staff report - City of Toronto Naming Rights Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41842.pdf
(October 14, 2011) Appendix 3 to the staff report - City of Toronto Honourific and Street Naming Policy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41843.pdf
Communications (City Council)
(November 29, 2011) E-mail from Anne Keary (CC.New.EX12.2.2)
EX12.3 - Monetization Potential of City Assets
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. The City, as shareholder, jointly with BPC Penco, direct the Board of Enwave Energy Corporation ("Enwave") to undertake all necessary actions to solicit proposals for a joint sale of 100% of the shareholders' interest in Enwave on behalf of both shareholders through a competitive auction, in such a way as to obtain the maximum proceeds for the shareholders.
2. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer (the DCM/CFO) to execute amendments to the Enwave Shareholder's Agreement, as described in the Confidential Attachment of the report (October 18, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, on terms and conditions satisfactory to the DCM/CFO and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, to facilitate the sale of the shareholders' interest in Enwave free from the restrictions on sale contained therein.
3. City Council direct the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report back directly to Council on the sale process in regard to Enwave and the recommendations from the Enwave Board in that regard, and make recommendations in regard to execution of a sale.
4. City Council direct that the net proceeds of disposition of Enwave shares be allocated to the Capital Financing Reserve Fund (XR 1011) and used to offset future debt issuance.
5. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to these recommendations; and that leave be granted for the introduction of any necessary bills in Council to give effect to Council's decision.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 18, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, remains confidential in its entirety, in accordance with the provision of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as it contains information about the security of the property of the municipality.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on November 30, 2011, and considered confidential information on this Item as it relates to the security of the property of the municipality or local board.
Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41900.pdf
(October 18, 2011) Confidential Appendix to the staff report - Monetization Potential of City Assets
Communications (Committee)
(November 1, 2011) Fax from Ann Dembinski, President, CUPE Local 79 (EX.New.EX12.3.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/comm/communicationfile-26174.pdf
(November 1, 2011) Letter from Dave Hewitt, Vice President, Local 416 (EX.New.EX12.3.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/comm/communicationfile-26217.pdf
(November 1, 2011) Letter from Dave Philpott, Vice-President CUPE Local One (EX.New.EX12.3.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/comm/communicationfile-26388.pdf
EX12.4 - Evergreen Brick Works - Amendment to Credit Facilities Terms
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 29 - Toronto-Danforth
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. Subject to obtaining approval from the Toronto and Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) to the effect of Parts 2 and 3 below, on terms satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor, City Council grant authority for the City, in conjunction with TRCA, to extend the term of their current joint and several Capital Loan Guarantee of $7.5 Million (inclusive of all interest, costs and charges) in respect of the Project by 18 months, from its current expiration on December 31, 2014 to expiration on the earlier of June 30, 2016 or the date of termination or payout of Evergreen's Project construction financing with RBC (the "Financing") and to require that the outstanding Financing be reduced to $4.81 million by December 31, 2013, and to $1.0 million by December 31, 2014.
2. City Council grant authority for the City, in conjunction with TRCA, to consent to and acknowledge the extension of the Financing term on such terms and conditions as are satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the General Manager of Economic Development, and in form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
3. City Council grant authority for the City to enter into any Project-related amending agreement(s), consents, acknowledgements and agreements or ancillary documents between the City, TRCA, Evergreen and RBC which, in the opinion of the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the City Solicitor, may be required, desirable or necessary to give effect to the above recommendations, including, the extension of the Capital Loan Guarantee, RBC's General Letter Agreement, the Four Party Agreement and the dates and terms for funding to be obtained by Evergreen as contemplated by the Ground Lease, all subject to such further revisions and other terms and conditions as may be satisfactory to the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in consultation with the General Manager of Economic Development and Culture, and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41844.pdf
EX12.5 - 2012 Interim Estimates
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the 2012 Interim Operating Estimates totalling $1.903 billion as detailed by City Program and Agency in Appendix 1 of the report (October 17, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
2. City Council authorize the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to make net disbursements of $1.616 billion during the period January 1 to February 29, 2012, including cash transfers of $341.3 million to Agencies as detailed in Appendix 1 of the report (October 17, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
3. City Council approve debenture financing of no more than $120.558 million with terms not to exceed the useful life of the capital assets.
4. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41845.pdf
EX12.6 - Property Taxes: 2012 Interim Levy By-Law
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct that the 2012 interim levy for all property classes be based on 50 percent of the total 2011 taxes billed for each property, adjusted, as necessary, to reflect any additional taxes added to the previous year's taxes as a result of assessment added to the tax roll.
2. City Council direct that the 2012 interim levy by-law provide that the interim levy will apply to assessments added to the tax roll for 2011 that were not on the assessment roll when the by-law was passed.
3. City Council direct that the Interim Bill payment due dates for property tax accounts paid on the eleven (11) instalment pre-authorized tax payment plan be: February 15, March 15, April 16, May 15, and June 15, 2012.
4. City Council direct that the Interim Bill payment due date for the two (2) instalment pre-authorized tax payment plan be March 1, 2012.
5. City Council direct that the Interim Bill payment due dates for all other property tax accounts on the regular instalment option or on the six (6) instalment pre-authorized tax payment plan be: March 1, April 2, and May 1, 2012.
6. City Council provide authority for:
a. the collection of interim taxes;
b. imposing a penalty charge for non-payment of interim taxes at a rate of 1.25 per cent of taxes due and unpaid and the addition of such charges on the first day of default; and
c. imposing an interest charge on all outstanding taxes accruing from the first day of default at a rate of 1.25 per cent per month.
7. City Council grant authority for the introduction of the necessary bill in Council on November 29 and 30, 2011, providing for the levying and collection of the 2012 interim taxes prior to the adoption of the estimates for 2012, which by-law, when enacted, will be effective as of January 1, 2012.
8. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41846.pdf
EX12.8 - Operating Variance Report for the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2011 (Item BU15.1)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve a decrease of $0.547 million gross and $0 net to the 2011 Operating Budget for Toronto Transit Commission to remove the G20 Summit funding no longer needed.
2. City Council approve an increase of $62,506.98 gross and $0 net to the 2011 Operating Budget for the Community Partnership and Investment Program administered by Social Development, Finance and Administration Division, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits related to 650, 672 Sheppard Avenue East (source: XR3026-3700104), to provide a one-time grant of $62,506.98, including accrued interest, to the property managers, Vertica Resident Services, of the existing rental buildings at 640,642, and 644 Sheppard Avenue East, for the purposes of improvements to exterior landscaping at those existing rental buildings, including, but not limited to, seating areas, gardens and walkways.
3. City Council forward funds in the amount of $62,506.98 to the property managers of 640, 642 and 644 Sheppard Avenue East once Vertica Resident Services signs a 2011 Undertaking governing the use of the funds and the financial reporting requirements, and which specifically referenced the following:
a. The future submission by Vertica Resident Services, upon completion of the project or expenditure of all the funds, whichever occurs first, of a brief audited financial statement of expenses, which can be funded from the Section 37 funds.
4. City Council approve the in-year budget adjustments detailed in Appendix D of the report (October 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to amend the 2011 Approved Operating Budget between Programs with no impact to the 2011 Approved Net Operating Budget.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41850.pdf
EX12.9 - Capital Variance Report for the Six-Month Period Ended June 30, 2011 (Item BU15.2)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve additional carry forward for unspent 2010 capital expenditures totalling $2.008 million as detailed in Appendix 2.1 of the report (October 3, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, in order to continue work on capital projects, and that the 2011 Approved Capital Budget be adjusted accordingly with no incremental impact on debt.
2. City Council approve carry forward funding reduction for 2009 and prior year capital projects totalling $0.718 million to correct overstated carry forward funding estimates already included in the 2011 Approved Capital Budget as detailed in Appendix 2.2 of the report (October 3, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and that the 2011 Approved Capital Budget be adjusted accordingly.
3. City Council approve in-year budget adjustments to the 2011 Approved Capital Budget detailed in Appendix 3 of the report (October 3, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer.
4. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41851.pdf
EX12.10 - Adequacy of the Perpetual Care Reserve Fund (Item BU15.4)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. Starting in 2012, City Council endorse a plan to begin making pay-as-you-go contributions of approximately $5.9 million (plus inflationary increases) to the Perpetual Care Reserve Fund.
2. City Council direct that a minimum annual Perpetual Care Reserve Fund balance of $5.0 million be maintained to allow for unforeseen expenditure requirements through additional contributions as required funded from the current and/or future year Solid Waste Management Services (SWMS) Operating Budget.
3. City Council direct that Part 1 above be considered part of City Council's review of the Solid Waste Management Services 2012 Operating Budget.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41852.pdf
EX12.11 - Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget (Item BU15.7)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget as follows:
a. an increase of $220.8 thousand gross and $0.0 net to reflect confirmed 100 percent base funding from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; and
b. an increase of $1,175.0 thousand gross and $0.0 net to reflect the one-time 100 percent funding from the Provincial ministries.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41853.pdf
EX12.12 - Budget Adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget (Item BU15.10)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve adjustments to the Toronto Public Health 2011 Approved Operating Budget as follows:
a. an increase of $207.1 thousand gross and $0.0 net and a staff increase of 1.0 position, to reflect confirmed 100 percent base funding from the Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. This position will be eliminated immediately upon the cessation of 100 per cent provincial funding; and
b. an increase of $40.0 thousand gross and $0.0 net to reflect confirmed 100 percent one time funding from the Ministry of Natural Resources Canada.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41854.pdf
EX12.13 - Toronto Public Library - 2011 Capital Budget - Technical Adjustments at June 30, 2011 (Item BU15.8)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve adjustments to the approved Toronto Public Library Capital Budget and Plan, which have no net debt impact, as follows:
a. transfer $1.0 million gross and debt from the 2011 Virtual Branch Services project to the 2011 Self-Service Circulation project;
b. advance $0.7 million gross and debt to 2011 from 2012 for the Multi-branch State of Good Repair project; and
c. defer $0.7 million gross and debt from 2011 to 2012 for the Malvern Branch project.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41855.pdf
Communications (City Council)
Declared Interests (City Council)
Councillor James Pasternak - as his spouse works for the Toronto Public Library.
EX12.14 - Voluntary Separation Program - Toronto Public Library (Item BU15.9)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted that following:
1. City Council approve funding for a Voluntary Separation Program to be implemented at the Toronto Public Library Board, which has the same terms and conditions as the Voluntary Separation Program at the City, and will be extended to employees who are bargaining unit, non-union exempt and management staff to provide for:
a. a payment, to eligible employees, of an amount not to exceed 26 weeks’ salary as a lump-sum payment (or salary continuation to bridge to age 55), based upon her/his salary, and her/his continuous years of service, at a rate of:
i. three weeks' salary per year of service for union and exempt staff; and
ii. four weeks' salary per year of service for management staff;
b. a transition allowance, for non-retiring employees, of up to $3,000 depending upon service and employee type; and
c. payment of any ancilliary payments for vacation and sick-leave payouts that are required to effect permanent, sustainable savings.
2. City Council direct that the Toronto Public Library's Voluntary Separation Program be funded from the projected 2011 Year-End Operating Surplus.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41856.pdf
Declared Interests (City Council)
Councillor James Pasternak - as his spouse works for the Toronto Public Library.
EX12.15 - Exemption From User Fee Policy- Toronto Parking Authority
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct that City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 179, Parking Authority, and City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, be amended to delete therefrom the amendments thereto as enacted by By-law No. 1174-2011.
2. City Council direct that the Toronto Parking Authority be exempt from the requirement of Council approval of local board's fees as set out in the City's User Fee Policy, in respect only of the fee setting authority delegated to the Toronto Parking Authority pursuant to subsection 950-601D (as it will be after the implementation of Part 1 above) of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, and subsection 179-7D (as it will be after the implementation of Part 1 above) of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 179, Parking Authority.
3. City Council direct that the City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 179, Parking Authority, Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, and Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, be amended to reflect Parts 1 and 2 above, and grant authority for the introduction of all necessary Bills to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41863.pdf
(October 18, 2011) Appendix 1 - Amendments required to the City of Toronto Municipal Code
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41864.pdf
EX12.16 - Toronto Police Services Board - Feasibility of Staffing Review
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the Toronto Police Services Board to ensure its planned organizational review be independent and include findings and recommendations on police staffing and deployment, including reference to international best practices and benchmarks used to establish Toronto Police Service staffing levels and deployment strategy.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41866.pdf
Communications (Committee)
Declared Interests (City Council)
Councillor Norman Kelly - as his spouse is a civilian employee of the Toronto Police Service.
EX12.17 - Toronto Police Service - Parking Enforcement Unit: 2011 Operating Budget Variance Report for the Period Ending July 31, 2011
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve a budget transfer of $916,300 to the Service’s Parking Enforcement 2011 operating budget from the City’s Non-Program operating budget, to fund the cost of the 2011 portion of the 2011-2014 negotiated collective agreement for Toronto Police Association members.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41869.pdf
EX12.18 - Toronto Police Service - 2011 Operating Budget Variance Report for the Period Ending July 31, 2011
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve a budget transfer of $23,288,200 from the City’s Non-Program operating budget, to the Service’s 2011 operating budget, to fund the cost of the 2011 portion of the 2011-2014 negotiated collective agreement for Toronto Police Association members.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41873.pdf
EX12.19 - Toronto Police Services Board - Independent Civilian Review of the Policing of the G20 Summit
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve a one-time transfer of projected surplus funds from the Toronto Police Service’s 2011 Operating Budget, in the amount of $480,000, to the Toronto Police Services Board’s 2011 Operating Budget, to cover the costs of the Independent Civilian Review from October 2011 to its estimated completion date of March 2012.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 17, 2011) from the Chair, Toronto Police Services Board, remains confidential in its entirety in accordance with the provisions of the Police Services Act as it contains information about the security of the property of the municipality.
Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board; Authority under Another Act (Police Services Act)
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-41875.pdf
(October 17, 2011) Confidential Attachment 1 - Toronto Police Services Board -Independent Civilian Review of the Policing of the G20 Summit
Executive Committee - Meeting 13
EX13.1 - 2012 Rate Supported Budgets - Toronto Water and 2012 Water and Wastewater Rates and Service Fees
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the following:
a. Effective January 1, 2012, the combined water and wastewater rates charged to metered consumers shall be as shown below and in Appendix B attached to the report (November 9, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water:
Annual Consumption | Paid on or before the due date, $/m3 | Paid after the due date, $/m3 |
Block 1 - All consumers, including Industrial consumption of first 6,000 m3 |
$2.4897
|
$2.6209
|
Block 2 - Industrial tax class, volumes consumed over 6,000 m3, representing 30 percent reduction from the Block 1 Rate |
$1.7428
|
$1.8345 |
b. The water and wastewater rates charged to flat rate consumers be increased by 9 percent, effective January 1, 2012, to the rates shown in Appendix B attached to the report (November 9, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;
c. Effective January 1, 2012, the water and wastewater service fees shall be as shown in Appendix C attached to the report (November 9, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;
d. Effective January 1, 2012, an inspection fee be charged for the reuse of residential City sewer connection up to 150 mm with the fee to be set at $500.00 per service to be reused, as set out in Appendix C - Schedule 3, Wastewater Services, Ref. No. 15, attached to the report (November 9, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;
e. Effective January 1, 2012, a fee be charged for Technical Review by Toronto Water staff – Application to Toronto Water for exemption to permit the construction of a driveway sloped downwards towards a residential building with the fee to be set at $1,500.00 per application, as set out in Appendix C - Schedule 3,Wastewater Services, Ref. No. 16, attached to the report (November 9, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;
f. Effective January 1, 2012, a fee be charged for Technical Review by Toronto Water staff – Application to Toronto Water for new connection or relocation of storm, sanitary or water supply connection with the fee to be set at $300 minimum fee; additional $74/hour for each hour after 4 hours to a maximum fee of $1,500 per application, as set out in Appendix C - Schedule 3, Wastewater Services, Ref. No. 17, attached to the report (November 9, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;
g. Effective January 1, 2012, a fee be charged for Technical Review by Toronto Water staff - Application to Toronto Water for request to encroach within a City permanent or temporary easement (related to City water and sewer infrastructure) with the fee to be set at $300 minimum fee; additional $74/hour for each hour after 4 hours to a maximum fee of $1,500 per application, as set out in Appendix C - Schedule 3, Wastewater Services, Ref. No. 18; attached to the report (November 9, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;
h. Effective January 1, 2012, a fee be charged for Technical Review by Toronto Water staff – Application to Toronto Water for request to release from title a City easement (related to City water and/or sewer infrastructure) with the fee to be set at $300 minimum fee; additional $74/hour for each hour after 4 hours to a maximum fee of $1,500 per application, as set out in Appendix C – Schedule 3, Wastewater Services, Ref. No. 19; attached to the report (November 9, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the General Manager, Toronto Water; and
i. The General Manager, Toronto Water be directed to ensure that only in instances where a Water Service Turn-Off request is followed by a Water Service Turn-On request within 30 minutes of City staff providing the Water Service Turn-Off, the additional $75.00 Water Service Turn-On Fee be waived providing City staff did not leave the given property during the time period.
2. With respect to assistance for low-income seniors and low-income disabled persons, City Council approve the following:
a. The rebate for eligible low-income seniors and low-income disabled persons be set at a rate of $0.7469 /m3, effective January 1, 2012, representing a 30 percent reduction from the Block 1 Rate (paid on or before the due date).
3. City Council authorize, effective January 1, 2012, amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 849-18 "Eligibility For Block 2 Rate" which would allow the General Manager, Toronto Water, authority to resolve non-compliance issues wherein failure to do so within six (6) months, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Toronto Water, would remove the Block 2 Rate eligibility.
4. City Council authorize staff to consult with the City's major water stakeholders on funding options to address the capital funding deficiencies of the Program, including potential changes to the water rate pricing structure, and report back through the appropriate Committee in June 2012 so that any approved changes can be incorporated into the 2013 Toronto Water Budget and Rate Setting Process.
5. City Council authorize the necessary amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 441, Fees and Charges and Municipal Code Chapter 849, Water and Sewage Services and Utility Bill, and any other necessary Municipal Code Chapters as may be required, to give effect to Parts 1, 2 and 3, above.
6. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary Bills required to implement Council’s decision, subject to any necessary refinements, including stylistic, format and organization, as may be identified by the City Solicitor, the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and the General Manager, Toronto Water.
7. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary actions to give effect to Council's decision.
Toronto Water - 2012 Recommended Operating Budget
8. City Council approve the 2012 Recommended Operating Budget for Toronto Water of $381.553 million gross and $511.780 million in capital-from-current contribution, as funded by the water and wastewater user rates and other recoveries, comprised of the following services:
Service(s) | Gross ($000s) |
| Net ($000s) |
Water Supply & Treatment | 66,916.0 |
| 0 |
Wastewater Treatment | 103,356.4 |
| 0 |
District Operations | 88,969.0 |
| 0 |
Water Infrastructure Management | 9,557.8 |
| 0 |
Business Operations Management | 17,961.6 |
| 0 |
Operational Support | 36,398.1 |
| 0 |
Program Support | 58,667.3 |
| 0 |
Capital–from–Current Contribution | 511,779.7 |
| 0 |
Total Program Budget | 893,332.9 |
| 0 |
9. City Council maintain the information in Confidential Attachment 1 as confidential until the outcome of City Council's decision has been communicated to the Union and affected staff.
Toronto Water – 2012-2021 Capital Plan
10. City Council approve the 2012 Recommended Capital Budget for Toronto Water with a total project cost of ($84.206 million), and 2012 cash flow of $607.517 million and future year commitments of $1.876 billion comprised of the following:
a. New Cash Flow Funding for:
i. 258 new/change in scope sub-projects with a 2012 total project cost of ($84.206 million) that requires cash flow of $31.181 million in 2012 and a future year commitment/commitment adjustment of ($46.332 million) in 2013, ($116.851 million) in 2014, ($71.573 million) in 2015, $34.857 million in 2016, ($6.715 million) in 2017, $34.232 million in 2018, $32.688 million in 2019, ($9.625 million) in 2020 and $33.932 million in 2021; and
ii. 208 previously approved sub-projects with a 2012 cash flow of $576.336 million and a future year commitment of $574.174million in 2013, $503.660 million in 2014, $406.285 million in 2015, $171.223 million in 2016, $121.741 million in 2017, $89.599 million in 2018, $69.707 million in 2019 and $54.928 million in 2020;
11. City Council approve the 2013-2021 Recommended Capital Plan for Toronto Water totalling $5.393 billion in project estimates, comprised of $128.956 million in 2013; $351.171 million in 2014; $432.900 million in 2015; $568.497 million in 2016; $659.022 million in 2017; $694.189 million in 2018; $769.076 million in 2019; $883.792 million in 2020; and $905.115 million in 2021.
12. City Council consider operating impacts of $0.150 million in 2014; $0.397 million in 2015; $0.346 million in 2016; $0.152 million in 2017; $0.053 million in 2018; $0.115 million in 2019; $6.990 million in 2020; and, $4.878 million in 2021 emanating from the approval of the 2012 Recommended Capital Budget for inclusion in the 2012 and future year operating budgets.
13. City Council approve the transfer of $18.455 million to the Water Capital Financing Reserve (XR6003) from the Toronto Universal Metering project (CPW515-1).
14. City Council approve the transfer of $13.760 million to the Wastewater Capital Financing Reserve (XR6004) from the 2004 Sewer Development Charge Reserve (XR2026).
15. City Council request the General Manager of Toronto Water in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report to the Budget Committee in June 2012 on strategies to maximize funding capacity and/or provide reductions in current project costs to address existing and emerging unfunded capital priorities for consideration prior to the 2013 Capital Budget process.
16. City Council receive for information the Budget Briefing Notes and Wrap Up Notes for the 2012 Operating and Capital Budgets of the 2012 Rate Supported Budget for Toronto Water and 2012 Water and Wastewater Rates and Service Fees.
17. City Council refer the following motions by Councillor De Baeremaeker to the Budget Committee for consideration with the 2013 capital budget process:
That:
a. City Council amend the 2012-2021 Capital budget to include a $5 million allocation to the Scarborough Waterfront Trail and Erosion Control Project with the offset to come from the contribution to the Toronto Water Capital Reserve.
b. City Council amend the 2012-2021 Capital budget by including a $3 million increase to the Land Acquisition for Source Water Protection Fund with the offset to come from the contribution to the Toronto Water Capital Reserve.
Confidential Attachment 1 referred to in Part 9 above remains confidential in its entirety, at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals. The confidential information will be made public once the outcome of City Council’s decision has been communicated to the Union and affected staff.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42352.pdf
(November 9, 2011) Report and Appendix A from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and General Manager, Toronto Water on the 2012 Water and Wastewater Rates and Service Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42317.pdf
(November 9, 2011) Appendix B - 2012 Water Rates for Metered and Flat Rate Customers and Appendix C 2012 Water and Wastewater Service Fees
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42318.pdf
(November 4, 2011) City Budget 2012 Toronto Water Capital Budget Analyst Notes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42319.pdf
(November 4, 2011) City Budget 2012 Toronto Water Operating Budget Analyst Notes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42320.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Revised Toronto Water Program Appendix 3 - 2012 Recommended Capital Budget; 2013 to 2021 Capital Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42330.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Revised Toronto Wastewater Program Appendix 3 - 2012 Recommended Capital Budget: 2013 to 2021 Capital Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42332.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Appendix 4 - Toronto Water Capital Program - 2012 Recommended Cash Flow and Future and Year Commitments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42322.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Appendix 4 - Toronto Wastewater Capital Program - 2012 Recommended Cash Flow and Future Year Commitments
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42323.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Appendix 5 - Toronto Water Capital Program - 2012 Recommended Capital Project with Financing Details
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42324.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Appendix 5 - Toronto Wastewater Capital Program - 2012 Recommended Capital Project with Financing Details
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42325.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Appendix 3 - Toronto Water Operating Program - Summary of 2012 Recommended Service Changes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42326.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Appendix 4 - Toronto Water Operating Program - Summary of 2012 Recommended New/Enhanced Service Priority Actions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42327.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Presentation by General Manager, Toronto Water on the Toronto Water 2012 Recommended Operating Budget and 2012 - 2021 Capital Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42321.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Memo from the Director, Financial Planning Division regarding Rate Supported Programs - Briefing Notes on Toronto Water and Solid Waste Management Issues
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42471.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Wrap-Notes to Executive Committee - 2012 Recommended Operating Budget Rate Supported Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42485.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Wrap-Notes to Executive Committee - 2012-2021 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan - Rate Supported Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42486.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42563.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(November 15, 2011) E-mail from Betty Karsh (EX.New.EX13.1.2)
(November 18, 2011) E-mail from Allen Elias (EX.New.EX13.1.3)
(November 20, 2011) E-mail from Gerry Cooper, Public Policy Advisor, People for Safe Drinking Water (EX.New.EX13.1.4)
(November 20, 2011) E-mail from Victoria Schei (EX.New.EX13.1.5)
(November 21, 2011) E-mail from Karen Buck (EX.New.EX13.1.6)
(November 20, 2011) E-mail from Frank Moir (EX.New.EX13.1.7)
(November 21, 2011) E-mail from Submission from Paul Lewkowicz, Centennial Community & Recreation Association (CCRA) with further 133 signatures to the petition submitted to the Budget Committee on November 10, 2011 (BU16.1.3) on file in the Office of the City Clerk (EX13.1.8) (EX.New.EX13.1.8)
(November 18, 2011) E-mail from Anna Schaefer, President, Markland Wood Homeowners Association (EX.New.Ex13.1.9)
(November 18, 2011) E-mail from Danuta and Marian Lewkowicz (EX.New.EX13.1.10)
(November 19, 2011) E-mail from Ralph Jeffers (EX.New.EX13.1.11)
(November 20, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Karsh (EX.New.EX13.1.12)
(November 20, 2011) E-mail from Anthony Sibley (EX.New.EX13.1.13)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Petition containing 10 signatures regarding Highland Creek Treatment Plant (EX.New.EX13.1.14)
(November 18, 2011) Letter from Ann Dembinski, President, CUPE Local 79 (EX.New.EX13.1.15)
Communications (City Council)
(November 27, 2011) E-mail from Victoria Schei (CC.Supp.EX13.1.17)
(November 21, 2011) Letter from Paul Lewkowicz, Centennial Community and Recreation Association (CC.Supp.EX13.1.18)
Declared Interests (City Council)
Councillor Gord Perks - as it relates to the operating budget for Toronto Water's Blue Flag program, as his spouse works for an organization that receives a small fee to run the organization.
1a - Budget Briefing Notes and Wrap Up Notes - 2012 Rate Supported Budgets -Toronto Water and 2012 Water and Wastewater Rates and Service Fees
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42473.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Capital Budget - Budget Briefing Notes - Table of Contents - Toronto Water
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42475.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Budget Briefing Note 1 - 2012 Capital Budget Briefing Note - Basement Flooding Protection Program - Project List: 2012 to 2016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42476.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Budget Briefing Note 2 - 2012 Capital Budget-Implementation of Automated Meter Reading as a Result of the Transfer of $18 million to the Capital Reserve
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42477.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Operating Budget Briefing Notes-Table of Contents-Toronto Water and Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42479.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Budget Briefing Note 1 - 2012 Operating Budget Briefing Note - Cost Assumptions for revenue loss regarding eligibility criteria for Block 2 rate customers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42478.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Wrap-Notes to Executive Committee - 2012 Recommended Operating Budget Rate Supported Programs
(November 21, 2011) Wrap-Notes to Executive Committee - 2012-2021 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan - Rate Supported Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42488.pdf
EX13.2 - 2012 Rate Supported Budgets - Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2012 Solid Waste Rates
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council adopt the 2012 Solid Waste Rates as set out in Appendix A attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to become effective on January 1, 2012.
2. City Council adopt the new Multi-Residential Billing System and Solid Waste Rate/Rebate Structure for Multi-Residential Curbside Collection (Subscription) customers as set out in Appendix B attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, with the rate structure to become effective on January 1, 2012.
3. City Council adopt the expansion of Solid Waste Management Services' Commercial Collection Program to include Non-Residential Properties based on the eligibility criteria and principles as described in Appendix C attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, effective July 1, 2012.
4. City Council adopt the rate structure and the billing system for the eligible Non-Residential Properties as set out in Appendix D attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, on a phase in schedule as follows:
a. Beginning on July 1, 2012 - 25 percent of the applicable fees set out in Appendix D attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, will be charged to the eligible Non-Residential Properties;
b. Beginning on January 1, 2013 - 50 percent of the applicable fees set out in Appendix D attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, will be charged to the eligible Non-Residential Properties;
c. Beginning on January 1, 2014 - 75 percent of the applicable fees set out in Appendix D attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, will be charged to the eligible Non-Residential Properties; and
d. Beginning on January 1, 2015 - 100 percent of the applicable fees for the year fees set out in Appendix D will be charged to the eligible Non-Residential Properties.
5. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to charge the tip fees at City Transfer Stations, as set out in Appendix F attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to the charitable organizations listed in Appendix F, effective July 1, 2012 on the same phase in schedule as set out in Part 4 above.
6. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to offer a twice weekly premium organics collection service, effective January 1, 2012, to those eligible commercial properties on the Commercial Collection Program based on the rate set out in Appendix A attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services.
7. City Council adopt the proposed modifications to the Commercial, ABCD and School Board Front-End Bulk Rates as set out in Appendix E attached to the report (November 4, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, and application of these charges to the customer's Utility Bill be approved effective July 1, 2012.
8. City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit the necessary bills to Council required to implement Council’s decision.
Solid Waste Management - 2012 Recommended Operating Budget
9. City Council approve the 2012 Recommended Operating Budget for Solid Waste Management Services (SWMS) of $345.836 million gross and $0.0 million net, comprised of the following services:
Gross | Net | |||
Services | ($000s) | ($000s) | ||
Program Support | 65,378.1 | (199,921.9)) | ||
Collection | 116,705.5 | 112,867.9 | ||
Transfer | 29,840.6 | 22,555.3 | ||
Processing | 40,397.9 | 20,066.5 | ||
Disposal | 93,513.9 | 44,432.1 | ||
Total Program Budget | 345,836.1 | 0.0 |
10. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to organize 44 Community Environment Days by reducing the cost of Environment days as follows:
Salaries/Benefits $32,500
Reduce the promotion budget per event
from $1,000 to $500 $22,000
Security/Paid Duty and General
Printing/Brochures $68,000
Total $122,500
11. City Council request the Acting General Manager Solid Waste Management Services and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report to the Budget Committee as part of the 2011 Year-End Variance Report on the actual net contribution to the Waste Management Reserve Fund.
12. City Council request the Acting General Manager of Solid Waste Management in consultation with the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee and the Budget Committee prior to the 2013 Budget Process to reconfirm City Council's commitment to continue with the 70 percent Waste Diversion Program and to recommend a supporting Multi-Year Rate Strategy.
13. City Council maintain the information contained in Confidential Attachment 1 as confidential until the outcome of City Council's decision has been communicated to Unions and affected staff.
14. City Council not eliminate the extra curbside recycling pick-up of bags and the resulting costs be offset by the reduction of the capital contribution to the Waste Management Reserve Fund by a corresponding amount.
15. City Council direct that a portion of the existing Solid Waste Management Services' Education and Communications budget be allocated towards proper recycling education.
16. City Council allocate funding from the Solid Waste Management Services promotion and education budget to a public education campaign targeted for multi-residential tenants that includes, but is not limited to:
- the importance of using green bin for organics;
- the importance of using blue bin for recycling;
- the importance of reducing garbage output to 2/3 of a standard garbage bag bi-weekly;
- any changes to the multi-residential fee structure; and
- relevant issues related to tenants.
17. City Council direct the General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services to ensure that the public education goals stated in Part 16 above be delivered to multi-residential tenants through a variety of means including, but is not limited to:
- direct mail;
- posters that can be placed in common areas of multi-residential dwelling; and
- public information sessions held at City facilities.
Solid Waste Management - 2012 Recommended Capital Budget & 2013-2021 Capital Plan
18. City Council approve the 2012 Recommended Capital Budget for Solid Waste Management Services with a total project cost of $85.681 million, and 2012 cash flow of $103.272 million and future year commitments of $100.486 million comprised of the following:
a. New Cash Flow Funding for:
i 16 new sub-projects with a 2012 total project cost of $85.681 million that requires cash flow of $43.603 million in 2012, $4.479 million in 2013, $7.630 million in 2014, $3.179 million in 2015, $3.046 million in 2016, $2.258 million in 2017, $4.939 million in 2018, $5.379 million in 2019, $5.584 million in 2020 and $5.584 million in 2021; and
ii 24 previously approved sub-projects that require cash flow of $16.047 million in 2012, $28.752 million in 2013, $23.856 million in 2014 and $5.800 million in 2015; and
b. 2012 approved cash flow for 15 previously approved sub-projects with carry forward funding from 2011 into 2012 totalling $43.622 million.
19. City Council approve new recoverable debt service costs of $0.620 million in 2012 and incremental debt costs of $3.401 million in 2013, $0.579 million in 2014, $0.882 million in 2015, $0.402 million in 2016, $0.372 million in 2017, $0.341 million in 2018, $0.637 million in 2019, $0.689 million in 2020 and $0.711 million in 2021 resulting from the approval of the 2012 Recommended Capital Budget, to be included in the 2012 and future year operating budgets.
20. City Council approve the 2013-2021 Recommended Capital Plan for Solid Waste Management Services totalling $456.098 million in project estimates, comprised of $75.949 million in 2013; $156.502 million in 2014; $107.374 million in 2015; $16.239 million in 2016; $16.724 million in 2017; $19.343 million in 2018; $19.447 million in 2019; $22.152 million in 2020; and, $22.368 million in 2021.
21. City Council consider operating savings of $1.156 million in 2012, $1.309 million in 2013 (including an 7 additional positions); and incremental costs of $4.229 million in 2014 (including an 12 additional positions) and $4.386 million in 2015 (including an 18 additional positions), savings of $0.333 million in 2016 (including deletion of 10 positions) as well as incremental costs of $0.047 million per year from 2017 to 2021 emanating from the approval of the 2012 Recommended Capital Budget for inclusion in the 2012 and future year operating budgets.
22. City Council approve that all sub-projects with third party financing be approved conditionally, subject to the receipt of such funding and if such financing is not forthcoming, their priority and funding be reassessed by City Council relative to other City-financed priorities and needs.
23. City Council request the Acting General Manager of Solid Waste Management Services, and the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer to report on a complete financial assessment regarding the viability of proceeding with the Mechanical and Biological Treatment Facility to the Budget Committee prior to the 2013 Budget Process including how this facility will impact the Multi-Year Strategic Plan for Solid Waste Management Services.
24. City Council request the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, and the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to report with recommendations to the appropriate committee as soon as possible on a fair and equitable means by which solid waste service fees can be calculated and charged without resort to the mathematical process of applying charges and crediting rebates on each invoice.
25. City Council receive the Budget Briefing Notes and Wrap Up Notes for both the 2012 Operating and Capital Budgets of the 2012 Rate Supported Budget for Solid Waste Management Services and Recommended 2012 Solid Waste Rates for information.
Confidential Attachment 1 referred to in Part 13 above, remains confidential in its entirety, at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals. The confidential information will be made public once the outcome of City Council’s decision has been communicated to the Union and affected staff.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42353.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Report from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer and Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on the Recommended 2012 Solid Waste Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42345.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Appendix A - Recommended 2012 Solid Waste Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42346.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Appendix B - Proposed New Multi-Residential Billing System and Rate Structure for Multi-Residential Curbside Collection (Subscription) Customers
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42337.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Appendix C - Proposed Expansion of Commercial Collection Program to Eligible Non-Residential Properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42338.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Appendix D - Proposed Non-Residential Customers Properties Billing System and Rate Structure
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42339.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Appendix E - Proposed Modifications to Commercial, ABCD and School Board Bulk Rates
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42340.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Appendix F - List of Charitable Organizations who currently do not pay tipping fees at City Transfer Stations and Proposed Fee
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42341.pdf
(November 4, 2011) City Budget 2012 - Solid Waste Management Services Capital Budget Analyst Notes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42342.pdf
(November 4, 2011) City Budget 2012 - Solid Waste Management Services Operating Budget Analyst Notes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42343.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Appendices 3, 4 and 5 - Solid Waste Management Capital Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42348.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Appendices 3 and 4 - Solid Waste Management Operating Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42349.pdf
(November 10, 2011) Presentation from the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services on the Solid Waste Management Services 2012 Recommended Operating and Capital Budget and 2013 - 2021 Capital Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42350.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Memo from the Director, Financial Planning Division regarding Rate Supported Programs - Briefing Notes on Toronto Water and Solid Waste Management Issues
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42472.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Wrap-Notes to Executive Committee - 2012 Recommended Operating Budget Rate Supported Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42489.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Wrap-Notes to Executive Committee - 2012-2021 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan - Rate Supported Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42490.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42598.pdf
(December 1, 2011) Submission by the Acting Director, Solid Waste Management Services - list of non-residential contacts (EX13.2c)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42775.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(November 21, 2011) E-mail from Karen Buck, President, Citizens for a Safe Environment (EX.New.EX13.2.2)
2a - Budget Briefing Notes and Wrap Up Notes - 2012 Rate Supported Budgets -Toronto Water and 2012 Water and Wastewater Rates and Service Fees
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42474.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Operating Budget Briefing Notes -Table of Contents-Toronto Water and Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42480.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Budget Briefing Note 2 - 2012 Operating Budget - Original Intent of 70% Diversion-Long Term Financing - Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42481.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Budget Briefing Note 3 - 2012 Operating Budget - Status of Multi Year Fee Strategy - Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42482.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Budget Briefing Note 4 - 2012 Operating Budget - Impact on Multi-Unit Buildings Green Bin Program Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42483.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Budget Briefing Note 5 - 2012 Operating Budget-Bridging of Single Stream Processing Contracts - Solid Waste Management Services
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42484.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Wrap-Notes to Executive Committee - 2012 Recommended Operating Budget Rate Supported Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42492.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Wrap-Notes to Executive Committee - 2012-2021 Recommended Capital Budget and Plan - Rate Supported Programs
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ex/bgrd/backgroundfile-42491.pdf
Audit Committee - Meeting 4
AU4.1 - Red Light Camera Program - Although Red Light Cameras Have Contributed to a Reduction in Accidents, Opportunities Exist to Improve Financial Results and Program Effectiveness
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to review the current Red Light Camera evaluation process to ensure that it is current, complete and as effective as possible, such review include an analysis of evaluation practices in other major North American Cities. The General Manager, Transportation Services, update the 2006 evaluation of the Red Light Camera program.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, as required by the operating agreement with the Province of Ontario, to report to the Province on the collision history of monitored sites.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to re-evaluate the current location of all red light cameras based on predetermined criteria. The results of this evaluation be compared to an even distribution of cameras on a ward-by-ward basis as requested by Council. Such information be reported to City Council as soon as possible.
4. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, as requested in April 2008, to report back to Council “with an update on the status of the red light camera operations”. In preparing the report, information detailing financial results of the Red Light Camera program be provided as well as revised estimates for future program costs and revenues.
5. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to explore opportunities for program cost sharing with other parties benefiting from the Red Light Camera program, particularly the Province of Ontario and the motor vehicle insurance industry.
6. City Council request the City Solicitor in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services, and the Chief of Police to request the Province of Ontario to amend legislation to permit Parking Enforcement Officers to issue tickets in relation to licence plate visibility.
7. City Council request the Treasurer, as part of the review of the enforcement of parking tags issued to out-of-province vehicles, to include in the review the City’s current inability to issue tickets for red light camera offences.
8. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, to ensure that all road markings at red light camera intersections are maintained to the extent necessary to allow the issuance of tickets for red light violations.
9. City Council request the Director, Court Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor to report back to Council by December 2012 on the impact of the Early Resolution procedures and on other options, including administrative penalties, if the number of trials requested in relation to red light camera charges does not decrease substantially.
10. City Council request the Director, Court Services and City Solicitor, in accordance with the request of Council, to report back to Council “on the average in-court fine” for red light camera infractions.
11. City Council adopt the recommendation contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 25, 2011) from the Auditor General.
12. City Council authorize the public release of the information contained in the Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 25, 2011) from the Auditor General, at the discretion of the City Solicitor in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (August 25, 2011) from the Auditor General remains confidential in its entirety at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as the information relates to the security of the property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions and is about litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards, and commissions. The confidential information in Attachment 1 will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor in consultation with the General Manager, Transportation Services.
Confidential Attachment - The security of the property of the municipality or local board; Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41470.pdf
(August 25, 2011) Appendix 1 to the Staff Report - Red Light Camera Program - Although Red Light Cameras Have Contributed to a Reduction in Accidents, Opportunities Exist to Improve Financial Results and Program Effectiveness
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41471.pdf
(August 25, 2011) Appendix 2 to the Staff Report - Management's Response to the Auditor General's Red Light Camera Program - Although Red Light Cameras Have Contributed to a Reduction in Accidents, Opportunities Exist to Improve Financial Results and Program Effectiveness
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41472.pdf
(October 20, 2011) Presentation from the Auditor General on the Review of the Red Light Camera Program
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41887.pdf
(October 20, 2011) Confidential Presentation from the Auditor General on the Review of the Red Light Camera Program
AU4.2 - Continuous Controls Monitoring - Employee Overtime
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, received this Item, for information.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41416.pdf
AU4.3 - Review of Infrastructure Stimulus Funding - Opportunities Exist to Improve Controls over Construction Projects
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to ensure:
a. exceptions, amendments, or interpretations of program guidelines and grant and contribution agreements are clearly documented; and
b. City practices not consistent with agreement terms and conditions are approved by Council as required, and reported to the appropriate federal or provincial Minister in order to ensure transparency.
2. City Council request the City Manager to report publicly on the stimulus program overall effects on improving City infrastructure assets and overall capital program.
3. City Council request the City Manager to ensure the City-wide prioritization framework for capital projects is complied with as part of the annual and long-term financial planning process. The project ranking be considered as part of the City’s overall capital program funding allocation.
4. City Council request the Director, Purchasing and Materials Management Division to direct staff to comply with existing policies and procedures requiring periodic audits of the use of rosters.
5. City Council request the Director, Purchasing and Material Management Division to modify existing purchasing procedures to encompass multiple award purchases. Such procedures to include:
a. The evaluation of cost as an additional criteria for the assignment of all task orders;
b. The requirement for documentation in each task order file in support of vendor choice for order assignment; and
c. Guidelines for task orders, defining limitations on the inclusion of activities and materials not included in the initial competitive call and General Services Contract.
6. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in consultation with the City Solicitor, to review the risks, benefits, and costs of inspection and testing agency hiring practices with a view to establishing criteria for determining when the City, its consultant, or its contractor should hire and pay the agency.
7. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Parks Forestry and Recreation to ensure all staff managing construction projects, sufficiently document actions taken to respond to test results failing to meet specifications.
8. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services and the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to establish and implement procedures to ensure staff adhere to quality assurance procedures including:
a. Materials testing and inspections;
b. Final inspections and deficiency lists; and
c. Weight verification.
Additional training be provided regarding the level of documentation retained to demonstrate compliance with policies and procedures.
9. City Council request the City Manager to direct appropriate divisions to ensure staff managing construction projects adhere to operating procedures requiring payments against contingency be supported by change orders. Further, that change directives, RFQ issued by divisions, and/or change orders be approved by the appropriate signing authority prior to commencement of extra or additional work.
10. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to provide additional training regarding procedures for managing extra work in accordance with the Road Operations Contract Inspections Manual.
11. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to establish procedures for review of significant variances from estimated quantities and approval in accordance with signing authorities. Such procedures to include issuance of change directives and change orders be required for variances exceeding acceptable tolerances.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41422.pdf
(October 5, 2011) Appendix 1 to the Staff Report - Review of Infrastructure Stimulus Funding - Opportunities Exist to Improve Controls over Construction Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41423.pdf
(October 5, 2011) Appendix 2 to the Staff Report - Management's Response to the Auditor General's Review of Infrastructure Stimulus Funding - Opportunities Exist to Improve Controls over Construction Projects
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41424.pdf
AU4.4 - Remote Access to the City's Computer Network - The Management of the Process Requires Improvement
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the Chief Information Officer to advise divisions of the impacts of inaccurate estimates for the supply of remote secure access tokens and stress the importance of providing accurate projected estimates.
2. City Council request the Chief Information Officer to revise the procedures for charging back the cost of remote secure access tokens such that divisions are charged for costs incurred where estimates are significantly in excess of actual requirement.
3. City Council request the Chief Information Officer to explore options available for all City staff to remotely access the City's network including tokens, smart card, and DirectAccess to ensure the most cost-effective solution is implemented prior to December 31, 2011.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41419.pdf
(September 8, 2011) Appendix 1 to the Staff Report - Review of Remote Access to the City's Computer Network - The Management of the Process Requires Improvement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41420.pdf
(September 8, 2011) Appendix 2 to the Staff Report - Management's Response to the Auditor General's Review of Remote Access to the City's Computer Network - The Management of the Process Requires Improvement
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41421.pdf
AU4.5 - Amend Provincial Legislation to Improve Efficiencies and Increase Revenues
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the City Manager, in consultation with the City Solicitor and other appropriate officials, to review the following to determine whether or not the Province should be approached with a view to requesting an amendment to legislation:
a. the issues identified in the report (September 21, 2011) from the Auditor General; and
b. enabling the City to issue Community Investment Bonds to foster a greater sense of public ownership of transportation (TTC).
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41413.pdf
AU4.6 - Amendments to the 2011 Annual Work Plan
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, received the Auditor General’s Amendments to the 2011 Annual Work Plan.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41414.pdf
AU4.7 - Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena - 2010 Audited Financial Statements
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, received the 2010 audited financial statements of Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41417.pdf
(September 30, 2011) Appendix 1 to the Staff Report - Leaside Memorial Community Gardens Arena - 2010 Audited Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41418.pdf
AU4.8 - 2010 Audited Financial Statements of Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - Report No. 2
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the 2010 audited financial statements and management letters of the forty-three (43) Business Improvement Areas financial statements, attached as Appendices A to AV of the report (September 29, 2011) from the Treasurer and Acting Director, Business Services, Economic Development and Culture.
2. City Council request the Treasurer to review whether or not certain Business Improvement Areas, in view of the minimal revenue generated by the Business Improvement Areas, should be required to produce audited financial statements.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41461.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix A to the Staff Report - Albion-Islington Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41352.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix B to the Staff Report - Annex-Dupont Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41353.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix C to the Staff Report - Bloor Annex Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41354.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix D to the Staff Report - Bloor by the Park Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41355.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix E to the Staff Report - Bloor Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41356.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix F to the Staff Report - Bloor-Yorkville Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41357.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix G to the Staff Report - Bloordale Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41358.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix H to the Staff Report - Cabbagetown Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41359.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix I to the Staff Report - Church-Wellesley Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41360.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix J to the Staff Report - College Promenade Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41361.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix K to the Staff Report - Corso Italia Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41362.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix L to the Staff Report - Crossroads of the Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41363.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix M to the Staff Report - Danforth Mosaic Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41364.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix N to the Staff Report - Downtown Yonge Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41365.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix O to the Staff Report - Eglinton Hill Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41366.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix P to the Staff Report - Fairbank Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41367.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix Q to the Staff Report - Forest Hill Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41368.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix R to the Staff Report - Gerrard India Bazaar Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41369.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix S to the Staff Report - Greektown on the Danforth Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41370.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix T to the Staff Report - Harbord Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41371.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix U to the Staff Report - Long Branch Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41372.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix V to the Staff Report - Dundas West Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41373.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix W to the Staff Report - Hillcrest Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41374.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix X to the Staff Report - Junction Gardens Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41375.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix Y to the Staff Report - Kennedy Road Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41376.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix Z to the Staff Report - Korea Town Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41377.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AA to the Staff Report - Lakeshore Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41378.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AB to the Staff Report - Little Italy Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41379.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AC to the Staff Report - Mimico by the Lake Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41380.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AD to the Staff Report - Mimico Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41381.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AE to the Staff Report - Mount Dennis Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41382.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AF to the Staff Report - Oakwood Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41383.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appencix AG to the Staff Report - Rosedale Main Street Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41384.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AH to the Staff Report - St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41385.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AI to the Staff Report - The Waterfront Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41388.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AJ to the Staff Report - Trinity Bellwoods Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41389.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AK to the Staff Report - Toronto Entertainment District Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41390.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AL to the Staff Report - Upper Village Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41391.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AM to the Staff Report - Uptown Yonge Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41392.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AN to the Staff Report - Village of Islington Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41393.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AO to the Staff Report - Weston Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41394.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AP to the Staff Report - Wychwood Heights Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41395.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AQ to the Staff Report - Little Portugal Financial Statements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41396.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AR to the Staff Report - Downtown Yonge Management Letter dated May 6, 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41397.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AS to the Staff Report - Toronto Entertainment District Management Letter May 4, 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41398.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AT to the Staff Report - A letter dated September 13, 2011 from the Long Branch auditor, Allen Morris, stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41399.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AU to the Staff Report - A letter dated September 12, 2011 from the Dundas West auditor, Berman, Lofchick & Lum, LLP stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41400.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Appendix AV to the Staff Report - A letter from the auditor, Rafiq Dosani dated September 10, 2011 stating that there were no significant management letter issues identified.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41401.pdf
AU4.13 - Untendered Sole-Source Purchases
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following
1. City Council direct the City Manager to review the allegations that staff made nearly $2.5 million in untendered, sole-source purchases before receiving appropriate approvals as detailed in the Toronto Star article titled "The more things change…" on August 8, 2011. This review be considered in the context of the many reports issued by the Auditor General on the matter as well as issues raised in the Bellamy Report.
2. City Council direct the City Manager to ensure that appropriate measures are taken when individual staff are found to repeatedly approve untendered sole-source purchases outside the boundaries of their authorized responsibility.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-41874.pdf
Civic Appointments Committee - Meeting 13
CA13.1 - 2011/2012 CNEA Appointments to the Board of Governors of Exhibition Place
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council appoint Jim Melvin (Honourary President), Jennifer Ward (First Vice-President) and John Kiru (Second Vice-President) to The Board of Governors of Exhibition Place for a term of office expiring in October 2012, or until their successors are duly appointed.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-42197.pdf
CA13.2 - Appointment to Fill Vacancy on the Toronto Licensing Tribunal
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council appoint the alternate listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office starting on December 1, 2011 and ending on November 30, 2014, and until a successor is appointed.
2. The City Clerk make the appointee’s name public once appointed by Council and the appointee has been notified.
City Council has appointed the following person to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal:
- Ken Chan.
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Toronto Licensing Tribunal
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-42198.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42675.pdf
CA13.3 - Appointment to Fill Vacancy on the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts Board of Directors
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council appoint the alternate listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts Board of Directors, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014, and until a successor is appointed.
2. The City Clerk make the appointee’s name public once appointed by Council and the appointee has been notified.
City Council has appointed the following person to the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts Board of Directors:
- Ihab Khalil
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on December 1, 2011, to consider confidential information on this Item as it relates to personal information about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts Board of Directors. This Item was subsequently considered in public session only.
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the Hummingbird (Sony) Centre for the Performing Arts Board of Directors.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-42270.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42676.pdf
CA13.4 - St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Board of Management - Appointments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Board of Management, at the pleasure of Council, for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until their successors are appointed.
2. City Council appoint the candidate noted in Confidential Attachment 1 as Chair.
3. City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees’ names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.
4. City Council identify the candidate listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as an alternate for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment should a vacancy occur during the term.
5. City Council direct that the name of the candidate identified as an alternate remain confidential until appointed as a member, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.
6. City Council appoint Ron Lalonde and Carroll Anne Curry to be the tenant representatives on the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Board of Management, at the pleasure of Council, for the remainder of the term.
City Council has appointed the following persons to the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Board of Management:
- M. Ann Hughes
- Edward Kerwin
- Sabrina Kolbegger
- Mona Lee
- Steven Levitan (Chair)
- Nalini Stewart
- Ron Lalonde (tenant representative)
- Carroll Anne Curry (tenant representative)
Confidential Attachment 2 remains confidential in its entirety at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to personal matters about an identifiable individual being considered for appointment to the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Board of Management. The alternate's name will be made public if appointed to the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Board of Management.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on December 1, 2011, to consider confidential information on this Item as it relates to personal information about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Board of Management. This Item was subsequently considered in public session only.
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts Board of Management
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42677.pdf
4a - St. Lawrence Centre for the Arts - Tenant Advisory Committee
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ca/bgrd/backgroundfile-42271.pdf
CA13.5 - Board of Health - Appointments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council appoint the individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to the Board of Health, at the pleasure of Council for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until their successors are appointed.
2. City Council authorize the City Clerk to make the appointees’ names public once appointed by Council and the appointees have been notified.
3. City Council identify the candidates listed in Confidential Attachment 2 as alternates for the Civic Appointments Committee to consider for appointment, in the order listed, if a vacancy occurs during the term.
4. City Council direct that the names of the candidates identified as alternates remain confidential until appointed as members, as required under the Public Appointments Policy.
5. City Council direct the City Clerk to send letters to all incumbents, who applied but were not interviewed and appointed, by December 9, 2011 thanking them for their contribution.
City Council has appointed the following persons to the Board of Health:
- Kristle Calisto-Tavares
- Abdul Fattah
- Sadia Khan
- Suman Roy
- Jennifer Sarjeant
- Rumina Velshi
Confidential Attachment 2 remains confidential in its entirety at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Board of Health. The alternates' names will be made public if appointed to the Board of Health.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on December 1, 2011, and considered confidential information on this Item as it relates to personal information about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Board of Health.
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Board of Health
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42678.pdf
Community Development and Recreation Committee - Meeting 8
CD8.1 - Transitional Issues Impacting Toronto's Child Care System and Recommended Actions for Mitigation
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council communicate to the Premier of Ontario and the Minister of Education the urgent need for development of a child care stabilization and transition plan that ensures the availability of a sustainable, high quality and affordable child care system for all families.
2. City Council re-affirm the importance of child care for working families to the economy of the City of Toronto.
3. City Council reaffirm its request of January 26 and 27, 2010 that the Province of Ontario provide all of the necessary tools and resources necessary to support the transition to an Early Learning System and to ensure that the child care component of this system remains stable and sustainable. These tools and resources should include financial, legislative and policy supports that address:
i. the regulatory changes required to ensure efficiencies in child care operations that focus on younger children;
ii. simplified and flexible funding formulas that enable base funding of child care programs and that ensure affordability for all families;
iii. $27 million in transitional and operating funding to ensure that service levels are maintained during and following the transition to Full Day Early Learning Kindergarten (FDELK);
iv. $13.9 million in capital funding for child care centres located within schools; and
v. $13.5 million in capital funding to support the reconfiguration of child care programs outside of schools so that they can address the needs of younger children.
4. City Council also reaffirm its previous requests to the Province of Ontario that the provincial funding formula provide $20 million to maintain existing service levels of 24,000 child care subsidies, recognize cost of living and other legitimate increases in operating costs, and ensure program quality and adequate qualified staffing.
5. City Council request the Ministry of Education to consider changes to Day Nursery Act to:
i. make age grouping changes, to encourage expansion of programs for preschool children;
ii. allow flexibility in groupings for child care operators affected by the introduction of full-day kindergarten; and
iii. align child and full-day kindergarten;
and request the General Manager, Children's Services to monitor the Ministry of Education's response and to report back regularly to the Community Development and Recreation Committee.
6. City Council request the Ministry of Education to allow flexibility for child care centres which are not in schools to continue to escort kindergarten students to school and back from school during the transition years.
7. City Council request the Province of Ontario to immediately revisit its capital allocation to Boards of Education and expand this policy to include child care requirements in both existing and new schools.
8. City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services to report to the January 11, 2012 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee, and regularly thereafter, on the plans of the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board for a smooth transition from 2012 - 2014 for the extended day, and all breaks and holidays for schools that currently have school age child care.
9. City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services and the Medical Officer of Health to report on nutritional requirements for pre-school children currently in the Day Nursery Act and how nutritional requirements might be met within the full day learning.
10. City Council request that the General Manager, Children's Services, organize another series of regional meetings for child care providers and boards which includes staff from the school boards, Provincial Ministry staff and that Toronto MPPs and Trustees be invited as well as local Councillors, and that:
a. These meetings be held in those communities most impacted;
b. The General Manager, Children's Services work with the Chair of the Community Development and Recreation Committee to determine the locations; and
c. The public should be invited.
11. City Council forward a copy of the report (October 24, 2011) from the General Manager, Children's Services, to the Mayor's Child Care Task Force, the Toronto District School Board and the Toronto Catholic District School Board to inform their deliberations.
12. City Council forward the report (October 24, 2011) from the General Manager, Children's Services as amended to all City of Toronto MPPs.
13. City Council request the City Manager, in conjunction with the General Manager, Children's Services, to convene an intergovernmental meeting, as soon as possible and no later than February 29, 2012, to provide a briefing on the Transitional Issues Impacting Toronto's Child Care System, and invite all Toronto MPs, Toronto MPPs, School Board Trustees and Toronto City Councillors, and request that Children's Services staff provide information and logistical support for this meeting.
14. City Council request that Members of the Community Development and Recreation Committee meet with members of the Toronto District School Board and Toronto Catholic District School Board standing Committee(s) responsible for policy and planning related to the Full Day Early Learning Kindergarten program, to share information and discuss implementation challenges, and request that Children's Services and school board staff provide information and logistical support for this meeting, and report to the January 11, 2012 meeting of the Community Development and Recreation Committee on the outcome of these discussions.
15. City Council direct the City Manager to work towards not closing any child care centres under City control before the 2012 provincial budget announcement.
16. City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services, to report back to City Council, through the Community Development and Recreation Committee, on the implications of the provincial budget on child care.
17. City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services to develop a pamphlet and website page with easy-to-understand information on the funding needs and transitional challenges facing the child care system as a result of the implementation of full-day kindergarten in Toronto.
18. City Council request the General Manager, Children's Services, in conjunction with Strategic Communications, to develop a strategy that focuses on opportunities that have no cost implications for the City, to increase media coverage and highlight the child care issues identified in the report (October 24, 2011) from the General Manager, Children's Services.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-42007.pdf
(October 24, 2011) Appendix A - The Ward Analysis Process
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-42012.pdf
(October 24, 2011) Appendix B - Percentage of Centres at Risk - 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-42013.pdf
(October 24, 2011) Appendix C - Service Level 2014
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-42014.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Presentation by the General Manager, Children's Services, on an Overview of Toronto's Child Care System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-42188.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42564.pdf
(November 24, 2011) Appendix A - Communications Strategy Options
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42565.pdf
Communications (Committee)
CD8.7 - Request that City Council Approve a Service Agreement with SPRINT and City of Toronto
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Withdrawn
- Ward:
- 21 - St. Paul's
City Council Decision
Item CD8.7 was ruled out of order at City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
Speaker Nunziata ruled that this matter was under the mandate of the Government Management Committee and the Item was out of order in its current form. The Speaker directed the City Clerk to submit this Item to the Government Management Committee for its consideration.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cd/bgrd/backgroundfile-42183.pdf
Economic Development Committee - Meeting 9
ED9.2 - Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) - 2012 Operating Budgets - Report No. 1
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 17 - Davenport, 18 - Davenport, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council adopt and certify the 2012 recommended expenditures and levy requirements of the following Business Improvement Areas:
Business Improvement Area | 2012 Expenditure Estimates ($) | 2012 Levy Funds Required ($) |
Bloor Annex | 124,256 | 117,303 |
Bloorcourt Village | 288,913 | 140,899 |
Corso Italia | 306,532 | 249,059 |
Gerrard India Bazaar | 295,675 | 218,037 |
Korea Town | 117,913 | 61,612 |
Liberty Village | 288,686 | 259,429 |
Parkdale Village | 419,588 | 245,476 |
Financial District | 949,300 | 949,300 |
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-41988.pdf
2a - Financial District BIA 2012 Operating Budget
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-42273.pdf
ED9.3 - Cabbagetown Business Improvement Area (BIA) - Minor Boundary Expansion
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council designate the area described by Attachment 1 to the report (October 21, 2011) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as the amended Cabbagetown Business Improvement Area (BIA) under Chapter 19 of the Toronto Municipal Code.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to submit a by-law to designate the area described in Attachment No. 1 to the report (October 21, 2011) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, as a Business Improvement Area (BIA).
3. City Council grant the City Solicitor authority to amend Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, as necessary to reflect the expanded boundaries of the Cabbagetown Business Improvement Area (BIA).
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-42037.pdf
ED9.4 - Business Improvement Areas (BIA) Boards of Management - Additions and Deletions
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 22 - St. Paul's
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the additions and deletions to the The Eglinton Way and Junction Gardens BIA Boards of Management as set out in Attachment 1 to the report (October 26, 2011) from the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture.
2. City Council confirm that under Council's Public Appointments Policy, these Board members are appointed at the pleasure of Council, and Council retains the right to replace any appointed member at any time and for any reason.
3. City Council direct that Schedule A of the Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas, be amended to reflect the number of members and the number of members required for quorum for each of the BIA Boards of Management as necessary.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ed/bgrd/backgroundfile-42038.pdf
Government Management Committee - Meeting 9
GM9.1 - Cancellation, Reduction or Refund of Property Taxes -November 9, 2011 Hearing
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the individual tax appeals pursuant to Section 323 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 as provided in the Detailed Hearing Report marked as Appendix A attached to the report (October 25, 2011) from the Treasurer, excluding the following applications:
101 Westmore Drive 110
40 Dovercourt Road.
2. City Council approve the individual tax appeal applications made pursuant to section 325 of the City of Toronto Act, 2006 resulting in tax reductions (excluding phase-in/capping adjustments) totalling $269,162.48 including reductions in Business Improvement Area charges, as identified in Appendix B, in the report (October 25, 2011) from the Treasurer.
3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42067.pdf
(October 25, 2011) Appendix A - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 323 of COTA, Hearing 2011H4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42068.pdf
(October 25, 2011) Appendix B - Council Detail Hearing Report - Section 325 of COTA, Hearing 2011H4
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42069.pdf
GM9.2 - Voluntary Contribution Option on Property Tax Bills
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize a voluntary contribution option to be offered on property tax bills, and to accept and spend donations received through the voluntary contribution option in accordance with the City's donation policy.
2. City Council approve the list of contribution options (i.e., programs and/or services) that will be made available to accept voluntary contributions under this program, as set out in Attachment 1, in the report (October 25, 2011) from the Treasurer, that will be identified on the City's property tax bills and/or accompanying inserts.
3. City Council request that information on total donations received through the voluntary contribution program be reported as part of the Toronto Office of Partnerships' annual report on the City's donation activity.
4. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42070.pdf
GM9.3 - Continuation of Property Tax Exemption for Ronald McDonald House (240 McCaul Street)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council, pursuant to subsection 3(3) of the Children's Oncology Care of Ontario Inc. Act, 1993, authorize the transfer of the property tax exemption provided for Children's Oncology Care of Toronto Inc. from its current location at 26 Gerrard Street East to its new location at 240 McCaul Street, provided that the new location continues to be occupied and used solely for the purposes of Toronto Children's Care Inc.
2. City Council, pursuant to subsection 3(5) of the Children's Oncology Care of Ontario Inc. Act, 1993, authorize the registration of the existing agreement between Children's Oncology Care of Ontario Inc., and the City of Toronto on the title of the new property location at 240 McCaul Street.
3. City Council affirm that the transfer of the property exemption from 26 Gerrard Street East to 240 McCaul Street will not trigger the requirement to repay property taxes foregone in the preceding 10-year period, as provided for in the agreement between Children's Oncology Care of Ontario Inc., and the City of Toronto.
4. City Council grant authority for the introduction of the necessary bills to give effect thereto.
5. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42071.pdf
Communications (Committee)
GM9.4 - Feasibility of Publishing Expense Details of Senior City Staff on the City's Website
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the publication on the City's public website on a semi-annual basis, commencing with the 2011 calendar year, expenses related to business travel, conferences and training, hospitality and protocol for senior staff positions at the Division Head level and above.
2. City Council provide a copy of this Item to the City's major agencies and corporations requesting that they adopt a similar policy for their organization if they have not already done so.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42075.pdf
GM9.6 - Donation of Memorial Sculpture for Nathan Phillips Square to Commemorate Fallen Canadian Soldiers in WWII Italian Campaign
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the northwest area of Nathan Phillips Square as the prospective location for the donation of the proposed memorial sculpture commemorating fallen Canadian soldiers in the WWII Italian Campaign, on the condition that the donor group complies with the process and conditions outlined in the report (October 18, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer.
2. City Council request the General Manager, Economic Development and Culture, in consultation with the City Clerk and the Executive Director, Facilities Management, to report back to the Economic Development Committee once the donor group has selected the final sculpture design for donation to the City of Toronto.
3. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42077.pdf
(October 18, 2011) Attachment 1 - Letter dated October 12, 2011 from Barbara Boraks
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42078.pdf
(October 18, 2011) Attachment 2 - Proposed Location for Sculpture Donation: Nathan Phillips Square Site Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42079.pdf
GM9.7 - Toronto Public Health Office Lease Extension - 2340 Dundas Street West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 14 - Parkdale-High Park
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize entering into a Lease Extension and Amending Agreement with the Landlord for use of the Premises for a further term of five (5) years, with an option to renew for another five (5) years, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix "A", in the report (October 24, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other terms and conditions as approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the lease as amended and extended, including the provision of any consents, approvals, waivers, notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may at any time refer consideration of such matter to City Council for its determination and direction.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42080.pdf
(October 24, 2011) Appendix "A" - Major Terms & Conditions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42081.pdf
(October 24, 2011) Appendix "B" - Location Maps
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42082.pdf
GM9.8 - Real Estate Acquisitions - Agincourt GO Grade Separation Project
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 39 - Scarborough-Agincourt, 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize negotiations to acquire and to initiate expropriation proceedings, if necessary, for the property requirements set out in the attached Appendix "A" (the "Required Property"), in the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer, for the purpose of constructing a grade separation along Sheppard Avenue East at the Agincourt GO Station (the "Project").
2. City Council authorize the Director of Real Estate Services to serve and publish Notices of Application for Approval to Expropriate the Required Property, to forward to the Chief Inquiry Officer any requests for hearing that are received, to attend the hearings to present the City’s position and to report the Inquiry Officer’s recommendations to City Council for its consideration.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42083.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Appendix “A” - Table of Private Property Requirements
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42084.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Appendix “B” - Site Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42085.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Appendix “C” - Expropriation Plans AT2350083
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42086.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Appendix "D" - Expropriation Plans AT2350016
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42087.pdf
GM9.9 - Below-Market Rent Agreement at 2975 Don Mills Road West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 33 - Don Valley East
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City to enter into a Below-Market Rent tenancy agreement with North York Harvest Food Bank for a five (5) year term, substantially based on the terms and conditions set out in the attached Appendix “A”, in the report (October 24, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer and the Executive Director, Social Development, Finance and Administration, and any other terms and conditions acceptable to the Chief Corporate Officer, or his or her designate, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to administer and manage the lease agreement including the provision of any consents, approvals, notices and notices of termination provided that the Chief Corporate Officer may, at any time, refer consideration of such matters (including their content) to City Council for its determination and direction.
3. City Council grant an exemption to the Below-Market Rent Policy to allow North York Harvest Food Bank to become a tenant in the Community Room at the Oriole Community Centre without the need to solicit a request for proposals as required by the Below Market Rent Policy.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the lease, deliver any notices, pay expenses and amend the commencement and other dates to such earlier or late date(s), on such terms and conditions, as she may, from time to time, determine.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42088.pdf
(October 24, 2011) Appendix “A” - Major Terms and Conditions
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42089.pdf
(October 24, 2011) Appendix “B” - Location Map
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42090.pdf
GM9.10 - Transfer of Properties to Build Toronto and Declaration of Surplus - Fourth Quarter 2011
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 10 - York Centre, 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 36 - Scarborough Southwest, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1.. City Council grant authority to enter into an agreement to transfer the property on the south side of Wilson Avenue west of Tippett Road, more particularly described in Appendix 3, in the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer, including any agreements related thereto, to Build Toronto, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendices 1 and 3 attached to the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council declare the following properties surplus, with the exception of 2398 Yonge Street (Appendix 4(d)) and East of High Street and North of The Queensway (Appendix 4(j)), as set out in Appendices 4(a) – 4(k) in the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer, subject to the retention of those areas and interests required to satisfy operational requirements and subject to the retention of any interests required by law as well as those City and other interests required to be protected (Required Interests), with the intended method of disposal to be by way of a transfer to Build Toronto, on an “as is” basis, for nominal consideration (with Build Toronto to pay any applicable Land Transfer Tax, HST, registration and other costs):
a. North of Eglinton Avenue West between Wincott Drive and Islington Avenue (Appendix 4 (a));
b. North of Eglinton Avenue West between Islington Avenue and Russell Road (Appendix 4 (b));
c. North of Eglinton Avenue West between Russell Road and Royal York Road (Appendix 4 (c));
d. 253 Markham Road / 12 Dunhelm Street (Appendix 4 (e));
e. 5131 Sheppard Avenue East (Appendix 4 (f));
f. 138 Hamilton Street (Appendix 4 (g));
g. 455 Dovercourt Road (Appendix 4 (h));
h. 497 Richmond Street West (Appendix 4 (i)), with Appendix 4(i) amended by adding to the Declare Surplus paragraph the words:
"and, in respect of the "Building D" portion of the property, by way of a long term lease to Eva's Phoenix for a term of twenty years plus four renewal terms of five years each, subject to the City's right to terminate the lease during any of the renewal terms on three year's notice." and
i. North of Danforth Avenue, between Highview Avenue and Pinegrove Avenue (Appendix 4(k)).
3. City Council declare 2398 Yonge Street surplus for the purpose of extending the term of the lease of the existing tenant of 2398 Yonge Street, the Anne Johnston health Centre, for a further three year term.
4. City Council declare the following properties surplus, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendix 5, in the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer, and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the City Manager, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, subject to the retention of those areas and interests required to satisfy operational requirements and subject to the retention of any interests required by law as well as those City and other interests required to be protected (Required Interests), with the intended method of disposal to be by way of a turnover to Build Toronto, on an “as is” basis, for nominal consideration:
a. 9 Madison Avenue (Appendix 5(a);
b. Seven properties north of Dunelm Street, east of Markham Road (Appendix 5 (b);
c. Part of the Westwood property (3741 Bloor Street West and part of 925 Kipling Avenue (Appendix 5 (c)).
5. City Council authorize the Chief Corporate Officer to permit Build Toronto to engage in licensing and leasing activities in respect of the properties in this report that are or become the subject matter of executed transfer agreements, during the period prior to the closing of the transfer transactions, on terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
6. City Council grant authority to fund the City’s outstanding expenses related to the properties in the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer from the Approved Operating Budget for Facilities Management and Real Estate Services (FM&RES), in the year(s) that the expenses are incurred, as necessary, and, once these expenses are known, to transfer the funding for these expenses from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF), with appropriate adjustments to FM&RES’ Approved Operating Budget, as necessary, through subsequent Quarterly Variance Reports.
7. City Council approve, as the approving authority under the provisions of the Expropriations Act, the transfer to Build Toronto of any property in the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer that was acquired by expropriation without giving the original owner from whom the property was expropriated the first chance to repurchase the property.
8. City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services severally to execute the transaction documents required to implement the Recommendations in the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer on behalf of the City, including the execution of any required consents, approvals or permissions.
9. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions provided for in the report (October 26, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer on behalf of the City, including making payment of any necessary expenses, amending the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), and amending or waiving the terms and conditions, as she may from time to time consider reasonable.
10. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to introduce in Council any Bills necessary to give effect to the foregoing, including the rescission of any relevant by-laws.
11. City Council grant authority to enter into an agreement to transfer the property municipally known as 45 Strachan Avenue, 10, 11 and 25 Ordnance Street, more particularly described in Appendix 2 to the report (November 25, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer [GM9.10a], including any agreements related thereto, to Build Toronto, substantially on the terms and conditions set out in Appendices 1 and 2 to the report (November 25, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer [GM9.10a], and on such other and amended terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer (CCO), in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor, with Appendix 2 to the report (November 25, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer [GM9.10a], amended by adding to clause 2 of the Terms of Conditions of Transfer the following words:
", provided that Eva's Phoenix will have the option to renew the lease of "Building D" for four renewal terms of five years each, subject to the City's right to terminate the lease during any of the renewal terms on three year's notice."
12. City Council grant authority to the Chief Corporate Officer to permit Build Toronto to engage in licensing and leasing activities in respect of the properties in this report that are or become the subject matter of executed transfer agreements, during the period prior to the closing of the transfer transactions, on terms and conditions as may be approved by the Chief Corporate Officer, in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
13. City Council grant authority to fund the City’s outstanding expenses related to the properties in this report from the Approved Operating Budget for Facilities Management and Real Estate Services (FM&RES), in the year(s) that the expenses are incurred, as necessary, and, once these expenses are known, to transfer the funding for these expenses from the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (LARF), with appropriate adjustments to the Facilities Management and Real Estate Services Approved Operating Budget, as necessary, through subsequent Quarterly Variance Reports.
14. City Council authorize each of the Chief Corporate Officer and the Director of Real Estate Services severally to execute the transaction documents required to implement the Recommendations in this report on behalf of the City, including the execution of any required consents, approvals or permissions.
15. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transactions provided for in this report on behalf of the City, including making payment of any necessary expenses, amending the closing and other dates to such earlier or later date(s), and amending or waiving the terms and conditions, as she may from time to time consider reasonable.
16. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to introduce in Council any Bills necessary to give effect to Council's decision, including the rescission of any relevant by-laws.
17. City Council request the General Manager, Shelter, Support and Housing Administration, to report to the Community Development and Recreation Committee within 18 months with an update on the progress of Eva's in relocating their programs from Ordnance Street.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42091.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Appendix 1 - Terms & Conditions for All Transfer Agreements Appendix 2 - 45 Strachan Avenue, 10 Ordnance Street, 11 and 25 Ordnance Street Appendix 3 - Terms & Conditions for Transfer - South of Wilson Avenue and West of Tippett Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42092.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Appendiix 4 from 4a to 4k - Properties to be Declared Surplus for Transfer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42093.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Appendix 5 from 5a to 5c - Terms & Conditions for All Turnover Agreements - Properties to be Declared Surplus for Turnover
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42094.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42566.pdf
Appendix 1 - Terms and Conditions of Transfer for all properties
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42567.pdf
Appendix 2 - Terms and Conditions of Transfer, 45 Strachan Avenue, 10, 11 and 25 Ordance Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42568.pdf
Appendix 3 - Letter Agreement between Build Toronto, Whitecastle New Urban Fund and Eva's Initiatives
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42569.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Penny Bond (GM.New.GM9.10.2)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Wendy Horton, Executive Director, Youth Without Shelter (GM.New.GM9.10.3)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Frances and Edward Arko (GM.New.GM9.10.4)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Schuster Gindin (GM.New.GM9.10.5)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Geoffrey Mills (GM.New.GM9.10.6)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Sarah Fuller (GM.New.GM9.10.7)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Michael Crane, Vice-President, Springfree Trampoline (GM.New.GM9.10.8)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Ken Lewenza, National President, CAW (GM.New.GM9.10.9)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/comm/communicationfile-26750.pdf
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Michael Cruickshank, York Heritage Properties (GM.New.GM9.10.10)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Esther Kohn-Bentley (GM.New.GM9.10.11)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Colleen Diamond, Community Animator, CSI Annex Centre for Social Innovation (GM.New.GM9.10.12)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from William Abernethy (GM.New.GM9.10.13)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Heather McAllister (GM.New.GM9.10.14)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Linda Rosengarten (GM.New.GM9.10.15)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Robert van Cleef (GM.New.GM9.10.16)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Randy Funkman (GM.New.GM9.10.17)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Wendy E. Smith, Director, Emerging Markets, Scotia Capital Inc. (GM.New.GM9.10.18)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Gillian Kern (GM.New.GM9.10.19)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from David Trusler, Senior Investment Advisor and Financial Planner, BMO Nesbitt Burns (GM.New.GM9.10.20)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Lee-Anne McAlear, Partner, Current (GM.New.GM9.10.21)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Ettie E. Dawkins, Ethereal Weddings & Events (GM.New.GM9.10.22)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Danuta Markiewicz, Program Coordinator, Paloma Foundation (GM.New.GM9.10.23)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Candy Higgins (GM.New.GM9.10.24)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Aaron Abrams (GM.New.GM9.10.25)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Vera C. Teschow (GM.New.GM9.10.26)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Graeme Young, Senior Vice President, Colliers International (GM.New.GM9.10.27)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Carole Costello (GM.New.GM9.10.28)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Elizabeth Martin (GM.New.GM9.10.29)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Maya Lang (GM.New.GM9.10.30)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Adam Reid (GM.New.GM9.10.31)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Milica O'Brien (GM.New.GM9.10.32)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Colin Phillips (GM.New.GM9.10.33)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Michael Diamond (GM.New.GM9.10.34)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Paul Magder & Fern Mosoff (GM.New.GM9.10.35)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Liz Pounsett (GM.New.GM9.10.36)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Donna Culbert, Director, Parent Support Connection (GM.New.GM9.10.37)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Mary Fay (GM.New.GM9.10.38)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Karen Emerson, Artistic Director, Children's Peace Theatre (GM.New.GM9.10.39)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Gordon Currie (GM.New.GM9.10.40)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Justin Sage-Passant (GM.New.GM9.10.41)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Jill Coles (GM.New.GM9.10.42)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Juliana Sprott (GM.New.GM9.10.43)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Leslie Dobson, Manager, IT Customer Implementations, UPS Supply Chain Solutions (GM.New.GM9.10.44)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Staci Kentish (GM.New.GM9.10.45)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Diane & Jean Hook (GM.New.GM9.10.46)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Mark Caspi, Counsellor, Queen West Community Health Centre (GM.New.GM9.10.47)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Cake Patricia, forwarding a letter from Donna M. Hayes, Publisher & CEO, Harlequin (GM.New.GM9.10.48)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Jason Wagar (GM.New.GM9.10.49)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Gerald Fitzpatrick (GM.New.GM9.10.50)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Kathleen Wicks (GM.New.GM9.10.51)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Anna Gaszynski (GM.New.GM9.10.52)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Janet Burrows, President, WC Kitchen Foundation (GM.New.GM9.10.53)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Lance McIntosh, Executive Director, Paloma Foundation (GM.New.GM9.10.54)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Carl Cadogan, Founding Board Member, Eva's Place (GM.New.GM9.10.55)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Alison Gordon (GM.New.GM9.10.56)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Paul Mariani, Vice President, Senior Project Manager, Somerville Construction (GM.New.GM9.10.57)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Dan Thompson, President, Canadian Tire Jumpstart Charities (GM.New.GM9.10.58)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Evan Smith (GM.New.GM9.10.59)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Vicki Rodgers, York Heritage Properties (GM.New.GM9.10.60)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Various Individuals submitting 16 Identical Communications (GM.New.GM9.10.61)
(November 8, 2011) Multiple Communications from Various Individuals submitting 58 Identical Communications (GM.New.GM9.10.62)
(November 9, 2011) Memo from Councillor Peter Milczyn, Ward 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore (GM.New.GM9.10.63)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/comm/communicationfile-26796.pdf
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Robert Wilmot, Manager, Broadway Youth Resource Centre (GM.New.GM9.10.64)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Janna Levitt, Partner, Levitt Goodman Architects (GM.New.GM9.10.65)
(November 8, 2011) Submission from Liz Bovey & Jody Shulgan (GM.New.GM9.10.66)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Karen Charnow Lior, Executive Director, Toronto Workforce Innovation Group (GM.New.GM9.10.67)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Myrna Hill (GM.New.GM9.10.68)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Louise Smith, Chair, Youth Shelter Interagency Network (GM.New.GM9.10.69)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Mary Ann Archer, Nxknowledge Corporation (GM.New.GM9.10.70)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Pamela N. Leece (GM.New.GM9.10.71)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Adrian Ishak, Associate, Baker & Mckenzie LLP (GM.New.GM9.10.72)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Jean Kitchen (GM.New.GM9.10.73)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Wudasie Efrem (GM.New.GM9.10.74)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Danielle Koyama (GM.New.GM9.10.75)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Marsha Davidson, Teacher, Elementary, Secondary & Special Education, Thames Valley District School Board (GM.New.GM9.10.76)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Bill Sinclair, Interim Executive Director, St. Stephen's Community House (GM.New.GM9.10.77)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Lily Sparkie (GM.New.GM9.10.78)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Ken O'Connor (GM.New.GM9.10.79)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Robert Lang (GM.New.GM9.10.80)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Jill Kitchen (Jill & Rob) (GM.New.GM9.10.81)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Ryan Silva, Chair, CIBC Mellon's Corporate Social Responsibility Committee (GM.New.GM9.10.82)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Brent Merriman (GM.New.GM9.10.83)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Jillian Me (GM.New.GM9.10.84)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Elo Okpei (GM.New.GM9.10.85)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Thomas Gorsky (GM.New.GM9.10.86)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Christian de Fenoyl & Diane Gaudreault (Say Francais) (GM.New.GM9.10.87)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Dwight Lane (GM.New.GM9.10.88)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Cynthia Sranko (GM.New.GM9.10.89)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Kayla Meirinho (GM.New.GM9.10.90)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Kelly Sky (GM.New.GM9.10.91)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Jody Shulgan & Liz Bovey (GM.New.GM9.10.66)
(November 2, 2011) Letter from Councillor Ana Bailao, Ward 18 - Davenport & Councillor Mike Layton, Ward 19 - Trinity-Spadina (GM.New.GM9.10.92)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/comm/communicationfile-26823.pdf
(November 9, 2011) Submission from Maria Crawford (GM.New.GM9.10.93)
(November 9, 2011) Submission from Emily Wright submitting Petition containing 931 names (GM.New.GM9.10.94)
(November 9, 2011) Submission from Jack Prazeres, President, Luson Canadian Charitable Society (GM.New.GM9.10.95)
(November 9, 2011) Submission from Rob Myers (GM.New.GM9.10.96)
(November 9, 2011) Submission from Philippe Cyr (GM.New.GM9.10.97)
Communications (City Council)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Rebecca Giri (CC.Main.GM9.10.99)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Lana Kuhle (CC.Main.GM9.10.100)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Marnie Consky (CC.Main.GM9.10.101)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Mackenzie Kinmond (CC.Main.GM9.10.102)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Lisa Douglas (CC.Main.GM9.10.103)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Barbara Wynne (CC.Main.GM9.10.104)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Pat Wong (CC.Main.GM9.10.105)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Sharon Hapton, Founder and Chief Executive Officer, Soup Sisters and Broth Brothers (CC.Main.GM9.10.106)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Kate Mason, South Riverdale Community Health Centre (CC.Main.GM9.10.107)
(November 14, 2011) E-mail from Janet Laurence (CC.Main.GM9.10.108)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Chuong Nguyen (CC.Main.GM9.10.109)
(November 9, 2011) Letter from Marilyn Dyck, Executive Director, The Doorway (CC.Main.GM9.10.110)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-26949.pdf
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Paula Morrison (CC.Main.GM9.10.111)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Iain McBride, South Riverdale Community Health Centre (CC.Main.GM9.10.112)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Harry Smaller (CC.Main.GM9.10.113)
(November 9, 2011) E-mail from Tamara Lang (CC.Main.GM9.10.114)
(November 10, 2011) Letter from Leslie Dias, CAW National Representative (CC.Main.GM9.10.115)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-26954.pdf
(November 10, 2011) E-mail from Sian Llewelyn, Urban Health, SRCHC (CC.Main.GM9.10.116)
(November 10, 2011) E-mail from Ken Stuebing (CC.Main.GM9.10.117)
(November 24, 2011) E-mail from Francisco Kibedi (CC.Supp.GM9.10.118)
GM9.14 - Contract Extension: UAP Inc. Auto Parts - Contract No. 47012771
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the Director of Fleet Services and the Director of Purchasing and Materials Management to execute a six-month contract extension to June 30, 2012, with UAP Inc., under the existing prices, terms and conditions with no dollar value increase to the existing contract for the provision of various automotive parts for vehicles, heavy trucks, equipment parts and components on a consignment basis to Fleet Services.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42098.pdf
Communications (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/comm/communicationfile-26793.pdf
GM9.15 - Civil Lawsuit to Recover Contamination Costs - Don Mills Station
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 33 - Don Valley East
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 20, 2011) from the City Solicitor.
2. City Council direct that, in view of the fact that litigation is ongoing, the confidential information and recommendations in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 20, 2011) from the City Solicitor remain confidential until the lawsuit is finally resolved, including all appeals.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 20, 2011) from the City Solicitor remains confidential in its entirety at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege. The confidential information in Confidential Attachment 1 will be made public once the lawsuit is finally resolved, including all appeals.
Confidential Attachment - 1 - The receiving of advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42099.pdf
(October 20, 2011) Confidential Attachment 1 to the report from the City Solicitor on the Civil Lawsuit to Recover Contamination Costs - Don Mills Station
GM9.16 - Damage to Western Gap Breakwall - Update
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff contained in Attachment 1 of the report (October 26, 2011) from the City Solicitor.
2. The confidential instructions to staff contained in Attachment 1 of the report (October 26, 2011) from the City Solicitor be made public after the final resolution of the litigation.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 26, 2011) from the City Solicitor remains confidential in its entirety, at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality or local board. The confidential instructions adopted by Council will be made public after the final resolution of the litigation.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on December 1, 2011, to consider confidential information on this Item as it relates as it relates to litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality or local board. This Item was subsequently considered in public session only.
Confidential Attachment - 1 & 2 - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42101.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Confidential Attachments 1 & 2 to the report from the City Solicitor on the Damage to Western Gap Breakwall - Update
(October 26, 2011) Attachment 3 - Photographs of the Collapsed Portion of the North Pier
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42103.pdf
(October 26, 2011) Attachment 4 - Extract of Plan 63R-3424
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42104.pdf
GM9.17 - Wireless Secure Network Connection for Council Chambers
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request City of Toronto staff from Corporate Information, Technology Web and the Clerk's Office to make available a secure wireless network connection in the City of Toronto Council Chamber and Community Council Chambers to all Members of City Council.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/gm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42113.pdf
Parks and Environment Committee - Meeting 9
PE9.1 - Policy on Outdoor Ovens in City Parks
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the Outdoor Ovens in City Parks policy outlined in Attachment 1 to the report (August 29, 2011) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, subject to any necessary minor substantive, or stylistic refinements as may be identified by the General Manager, with the policy amended to require the following provision in agreements with community groups:
That where bake ovens are solely funded by a community group, that the City of Toronto be under no obligation to replace that bake oven upon the end of its life cycle.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to make the corresponding amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 608 - Parks to implement the inclusion of "ovens" and the provisions related to "ovens", as outlined in Attachment 2 to the report (August 29, 2011) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, subject to any necessary minor substantive or stylistic refinements as may be identified by the General Manager and the City Solicitor.
3. City Council refer consideration of the new Parks, Forestry and Recreation permit fees for the use of outdoor ovens in City parks to the 2012 budget process.
4. City Council direct that the report (August 29, 2011) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, be the starting point of a working policy that allows the city to permit bake ovens to operate and flourish in Toronto parks in the spirit of collaboration and cooperation with the communities.
5. City Council direct the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, in collaboration with the community representatives, local stakeholders and councillors, to report back to the Parks and Environment Committee two years after implementation of the policy on how the details of the permitting, fees, construction and operations are working.
6. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry, and Recreation to reaffirm and communicate to permit holders that public participants can make a donation to outdoor oven event organizers.
7. City Council request the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation to reaffirm to all groups using and/or considering constructing outdoor ovens that paid "naming rights" are an acceptable and viable way of securing operating and/or construction costs.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-41502.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(November 21, 2011) Submission from Jutta Mason, Centre for Local Research (CELOS) (PE.New.PE9.1.2)
(November 22, 2011) E-mail from Ayal Dinner (PE.New.PE9.1.3)
1a - Policy on Outdoor Ovens in City Parks - Supplementary Report
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-42200.pdf
(November 4, 2011) Attachment 3 - Proposed Policy on Outdoor Bake Ovens
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-42201.pdf
PE9.2 - Revisions to the Tree By-laws
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce Bills amending Chapter 658, Ravine and Natural Feature Protection, Chapter 813, Trees and Chapter 441, Fees and Charges, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code, in accordance with Attachment No. 1 of the report (November 2, 2011) from the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, including such technical and stylistic amendments as deemed necessary by the City Solicitor, and with the following amendment:
a. that Chapter 813 Article III (Private Tree By-law) Posting of Notice Application be maintained in its current form.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-42211.pdf
PE9.3 - Official Recognition of Friends of Elizabeth Simcoe Park
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 43 - Scarborough East
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council support the official recognition of Friends of Elizabeth Simcoe Park.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pe/bgrd/backgroundfile-42214.pdf
Planning and Growth Management Committee - Meeting 9
PG9.1 - Amendments to the Green Roof Bylaw for Industrial Buildings
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to amend Chapter 492 of the Municipal Code – Green Roofs (known as the Toronto Green Roof Bylaw) to allow for an alternative option to green roofs with respect to industrial buildings that provides a roof surface that:
a. Uses cool roofing materials for 100% of Available Roof Space; and
b. Complies with the stormwater management performance measures required through the Site Plan Approval process, pursuant to Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act; or where Site Plan Approval is not required, retains or collects for re-use at least the first 5 mm from each rainfall or 50 % of annual rainfall volume falling on the roof through systems that incorporate roof surfaces.
2. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report on revisions to the Green Roof Bylaw to reflect other changes including updates to the Toronto Green Roof Construction Standard before March 31, 2012.
3. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building and other City Divisions as appropriate, to report on the provision of an alternative option for public and separate school board buildings before March 31, 2012.
4. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on finding a mechanism to fund planting beds in addition to constructed green roofs.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-41968.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(November 8, 2011) Submission from Steven Peck, Green Roofs For Healthy Cities (PG.New.PG9.1.2)
PG9.6 - Glass Balcony Guards: Review
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to advise the Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes and the Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing of the results of the City's review of the use of glass panels in balcony guards and request that they consider an emergency amendment to the Ontario Building Code to better address concerns for public safety when glass paneled balconies may break.
2. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to advise the Toronto Building and Land Development Association (BILD), TARION, Ontario Association of Architects and Professional Engineers Ontario of the results of the City's analysis of glass panel safety in balcony guards and encourage these organizations to update their practices and professional training regarding the use of glass panels in balcony guards.
3. City Council direct the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to advise Industry Canada, Canadian Glass Association, the Safety Glazing Certification Council and the Glass Association of North America of the results of the City's analysis of glass panel safety in balcony guards and encourage these organizations to communicate and coordinate a comprehensive review of compliance safety standards for the manufacturing of non-metallic product used to produce architectural glazing materials.
4. City Council request the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building to re-evaluate wind tunnel standards and criteria and report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee on changes to improve modeling and application standards.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-42147.pdf
(October 25, 2011) Staff Report regarding Glass Balcony Guards Review (Notice of Pending Report)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-41971.pdf
PG9.9 - Planning and Growth Management Committee Item 8.3 Amendments to Chapter 694, Signs, General to adopt Signage Master Plans for 89 premises and locations containing McDonald's Restaurants (Ward All) referred by City Council on October 24 and 25, 2011
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments, Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code to add a Signage Master Plan for each of the following premises and locations:
6170 Bathurst Street
2116 Kipling Avenue North
2697 Lawrence Avenue East
2870 Eglinton Avenue East
3305 Sheppard Avenue.East
1890 Avenue Road
4435 Kingston Road
1280 Markham Road
747 Don Mills Road
2936 Finch Ave East
2 Ingram Drive
1735 Danforth Avenue
1221 King Street West
1787 Bayview Avenue
1185 Dupont Street
1045 Pape Avenue
2020 Jane Street
29-31 Woodward Avenue
4333 Bloor Street West
3150 St. Clair Avenue East
2736 Lakeshore Boulevard West
1831 Finch Avenue West
3101 Dufferin Street
25 Carrier Drive
7431 Kingston Road
1125 Sheppard Avenue East
395 Bamburgh Circle
900 Dufferin Street, Unit 0115
900 Dufferin Street, Unit 0450
31 Tapscott Road, Unit 1-G
3030 Don Mills Road
1001 Islington Avenue South
2625F Weston Road
45 Overlea Boulevard
1735 Kipling Avenue
3227 Eglinton Avenue East, Unit 139
630 Keele Street
195 North Queen Street
344 Bathurst Street
808 York Mills Road
2900 Warden Avenue
2362 Finch Avenue West
1966 Eglinton Avenue East
5453 Dundas Street West
2260 Markham Road
150 Rimrock Road
1571 Sandhurst Circle
3929 Keele Street
65 Ellesmere Road
1000 Gerrard Street East
in accordance with the administrative design features set out in Appendix A to the report (August 24, 2011) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building.
2. City Council further amend Schedule B, Signage Master Plans and Area Specific Amendments, Chapter 694, Signs, General, of the City of Toronto Municipal Code to add a Signage Master Plan for each of the following premises and locations, in accordance with the design features set out in Appendix A to the report (August 24, 2011) from the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, with the following amendments:
a. The express prohibition with respect to window signs listed in section 2B. of the administrative design features as set out in Appendix A be deleted and replaced with an express prohibition on signs located on a light standards for the purposes of advertising goods or products sold on the premises;
b. The regulations with respect to signs located on a light standard for the purposes of advertising goods or products sold on the premises contained in section 3D the administrative design features as set out in Appendix A be deleted and replaced with the following:
"3D. A window sign provided:
1. There shall be no more than 3 such signs erected at the premises;
2. The sign shall only display static copy;
3. The sign shall have no more than two sign faces;
4. The total sign face area of all such signs shall not exceed 25 percent of the area of the window excluding its frame;
5. The sign shall not be located above the first storey of a building; and
6. The total sign face area of all wall and window signs shall not exceed 20 percent of the area of the first storey of the wall on which the wall signs are erected."
the premises and locations being:
25 The West Mall, Unit 2020
192a Bloor St.West
470 Yonge Street
710 St. Clair West
218 Yonge Street, Unit #3-118
2480 Gerrard Street East
2365 Dundas Street West
2218 Bloor Street West
161 Bay Street, Unit C250
11 St Clair Avenue East
1168 St Clair Avenue West
300 Borough Drive, Suite #4, Unit 22A
6344 Yonge Street, Unit 114
345 Bloor Street East
61 Front St, Go Concourse, Union Station, Unit R2
1 Eglinton Square, Unit 141
160 Spadina Avenue
675 Yonge Street
4828 Yonge Street
20 Eglinton Ave East
10 The Queensway
1530 Albion Road, Unit F-1
100 Wellington Street West, Unit WS01A
3495 Lawrence Avenue East, Unit CB018D
1807 Eglinton Avenue West
121 Front Street East
710 King Street West
595 Bay Street, Unit FC1 & FC2
98 Danforth Ave
552 Yonge Street
700 Lawrence Avenue West
2 Greystone Walk Drive
123 Yonge Street
127 Church Street
109 McCaul Street
200 Front Street West, Unit F02
4025 Yonge Street, Unit F05
1800 Sheppard Avenue East, Unit F012
3400 Yonge Street.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to prepare the necessary Bills for introduction in Council to implement the above recommendations, subject to such stylistic and technical changes to the draft bills as may be required.
4. City Council request the Chief Building Official and Executive Director, Toronto Building, to report back to the Planning and Growth Management Committee as soon as possible on improvements to the notification and consultation process for signage master plans.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-41991.pdf
(October 25, 2011) Council Decision for PG8.3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-41992.pdf
(August 24, 2011) Staff Report on Amendments to Chapter 694, Signs, General to adopt Signage Master Plans for 89 premises and locations containing McDonald's Restaurants
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-41993.pdf
(August 24, 2011) Appendix A - Signage Master Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-41994.pdf
(August 24, 2011) Appendix B - Locations included in this Signage Master Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-41995.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(October 4, 2011) E-mail from JoAnn Duffy and Hugh Westren (PG.Main.PG9.9.2)
(October 5, 2011) E-mail from David S. Crawford, Secretary MTCC573 (PG.Main.PG9.9.3)
(October 5, 2011) E-mail from Suzanne Kavanagh (PG.Main.PG9.9.4)
(October 6, 2011) E-mail from Elizabeth Geleff (PG.Main.PG9.9.5)
(October 6, 2011) E-mail from Andrea Stark (PG.Main.PG9.9.6)
(October 7, 2011) E-mail from Richard Boehnke, Markland Wood Homeowners Association (PG.Main.PG9.9.7)
Declared Interests (City Council)
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam - as she owns a business adjacent to one of the affected properties.
PG9.11 - Removing Toronto from the Jurisdiction of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) and Asking the Province of Ontario to Abolish the OMB - Motion MM11.7 Referred by City Council on September 21 and 22, 2011
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, deferred consideration of Item PG9.11 to the next regular City Council meeting on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor to consider the items remaining on the agenda.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council on December 1, 2011 adopted a motion to defer any remaining Items on the agenda to the next regular meeting of City Council on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor for that purpose.
The following Items were subsequently deferred:
Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG9.11
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.5
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.10
New Business Item CC14.7, and
Member Motion MM14.28
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-41974.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(October 26, 2011) E-mail from Joan Dirstein (PG.New.PG9.11.2)
(October 26, 2011) E-mail from Geills M. Turner (PG.New.PG9.11.3)
(October 26, 2011) E-mail from Michael Bock (PG.New.PG9.11.4)
(October 26, 2011) E-mail from Michael Bock (PG.Supp.PG9.11.4)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Chris McLeod (PG.New.PG9.11.5)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Emerson Stephens (PG.New.PG9.11.6)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Patricia Jensen (PG.New.PG9.11.7)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from John N. Turner (PG.New.PG9.11.8)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Lorne Morphy (PG.New.PG9.11.9)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Roslyn Harris (PG.New.PG9.11.10)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Mary Helen Spence (PG.Supp.PG9.11.11)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Hartley Levine (PG.New.PG9.11.12)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Alexander Mair (PG.New.PG9.11.13)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Oliver Collins (PG.New.PG9.11.14)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from John Plumadore (PG.New.PG9.11.15)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Helena Tetley (PG.New.PG9.11.16)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Jim Barr (PG.New.PG9.11.17)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Shirley Morriss (PG.New.PG9.11.18)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Joan Boggs (PG.New.PG9.11.19)
(November 4, 2011) E-mail from Donna Wakefield, Deer Park Residents Association (PG.New.PG9.11.20)
(November 6, 2011) E-mail from Geoff Kettel and Peter Baker, Co-Chairs, FoNTRA (PG.New.PG9.11.21)
(November 6, 2011) E-mail from Andrew Horberry (PG.New.PG9.11.22)
(November 4, 2011) E-mail from Suzanne Kavanagh, President, St. Lawrence Neighbourhood Association (PG.New.PG9.11.23)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Janet Mairs (PG.New.PG9.11.24)
(November 5, 2011) E-mail from Alan and Joan Dubros (PG.New.PG9.11.25)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Gee Chung, President, The Greater Yorkville Residents' Association (PG.New.PG9.11.26)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Richard Warner, North St. James Town Working Group (PG.New.PG9.11.27)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Norman Waite, Bay Cloverhill Community Association (PG.New.PG9.11.28)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Richard MacFarlane (PG.New.PG9.11.29)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Susanne Palmer and Wayne Drewry (PG.New.PG9.11.30)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Lydia Levin, Co-Vice Chair, Eglinton Park Residents' Association (PG.New.PG9.11.31)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from John Burt, The Bloor East Neighbourhood Association (PG.New.PG9.11.32)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Michael B. Lowe, Version International Inc. (PG.New.PG9.11.33)
(November 7, 2011) E-mail from Larry Webb, Corktown Residents & Business Association (PG.New.PG9.11.34)
(November 8, 2011) Submission from Robert Fabian (PG.New.PG9.11.35)
(November 8, 2011) E-mail from Eileen Denny, Teddington Park Residents Association Inc. (PG.New.PG9.11.36)
Communications (City Council)
(November 25, 2011) E-mail from Geoff Kettel and Peter Baker, Co-Chairs, FoNTRA (CC.Supp.PG9.11.38)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27050.pdf
(November 28, 2011) Letter from William H. Roberts, Chair, Confederation of Resident and Ratepayer Associations in Toronto (CC.New.PG9.11.39)
(November 28, 2011) Letter from Eileen Denny, President, Teddington Park Residents Association (CC.New.PG9.11.40)
(November 30, 2011) Submission from Councillor Gloria Lindsay Luby, Municipal World Article, entitled "Proposed City of Toronto Local Appeal Body" (CC.New.PG9.11.41)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27105.pdf
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee - Meeting 9
PW9.1 - Continuation of Legal Proceedings Against Arad Group Inc. and Afshin Tajarrod
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council ratify the actions of the City Solicitor in commencing proceedings against Arad Group Inc. and Afshin Tajarrod, also known as Sean Sfeada, and the action of the General Manager of Toronto Water in undertaking to abide by any order concerning damages that the Court may make regarding the granting of an interim injunction.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to continue the said legal proceedings, to settle such proceedings, to appeal any orders with respect thereto and take any other steps with respect to the conduct of such litigation, as the City Solicitor may determine is appropriate.
3. City Council direct that Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (October 13, 2011) from the City Solicitor remain confidential as it relates to advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation affecting the City.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report the report (October 13, 2011) from the City Solicitor remains confidential in its entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation affecting the City.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on December 1, 2011, to consider confidential information on this Item as it relates as it relates to advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege and litigation affecting the City. This Item was subsequently considered in public session only.
Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions and contains advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41631.pdf
(October 13, 2011) Confidential Attachment 1 to the report from the City Solicitor
(October 13, 2011) Attachment 2 to the report from the City Solicitor - Interim Injunction Order from the Superior Court of Justice
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41633.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42806.pdf
PW9.2 - West Don Lands Subdivision: Phase 1, 66M-2473 Authority to Accept Conveyance of Lands Outside of the Harmonized Peer Review Process
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct that the City take title to the lands described as Parts 1 through 12 on the Draft Reference Plan, attached to the report (October 18, 2011) from the Executive Director, Technical Services, prior to the necessary environmental conditions being satisfied.
2. City Council direct that a condition of accepting these conveyances is that all Environmental Site Assessment Reports and agreements, (as defined in the HPRP and in the Subdivision Agreement Schedule B-1 Sections 25 to 32) prepared on behalf of the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation, for the Parts to be conveyed to the City, be submitted and concurred in by the City's Peer Reviewer prior to the conveyance of any or all additional lands within the subdivision.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to enter into or alter the appropriate agreements with the Ontario Infrastructure and Lands Corporation (formerly known as the Ontario Realty Corporation), to give effect to the recommendation herein, including such revisions as necessary to the Subdivision Agreement for the West Don Lands Phase I.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41811.pdf
(October 18, 2011) Attachment 1 to the report from the Executive Director, Technical Services - Draft Reference Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41812.pdf
PW9.5 - Implementation of Findings from Comparative Analysis of Pipe Materials Study for Large Diameter Transmission Watermains
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, deferred consideration of Item PW9.5 to the next regular City Council meeting on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor to consider the items remaining on the agenda.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council on December 1, 2011 adopted a motion to defer any remaining Items on the agenda to the next regular meeting of City Council on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor for that purpose.
The following Items were subsequently deferred:
Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG9.11
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.5
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.10
New Business Item CC14.7, and
Member Motion MM14.28
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41849.pdf
(November 3, 2011) Large Diameter Transmission Watermains - Pipe Materials Study - Presentation
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-42171.pdf
Communications (Committee)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27051.pdf
(November 25, 2011) Letter from Dr. Patrick Moore, Chairman and Chief Scientist, Greenspirit Strategies Ltd. (CC.Supp.PW9.5.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27052.pdf
(November 24, 2011) E-mail from Marion E. Axmith, Director General, Canadian Plastics Industry Association (CC.Supp.PW9.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27053.pdf
PW9.6 - King-Liberty Pedestrian/Cycle Bridge Class Environmental Assessment Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 19 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council grant authority to the General Manager, Transportation Services, to issue a Notice of Study Completion and to file the Environmental Study Report for the King-Liberty Pedestrian/Cycle Link Class Environmental Assessment Study in the public record for 30 days in accordance with the requirements of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment.
2. Subject to the Environmental Assessment approval of the King-Liberty Pedestrian/Cycle Bridge, City Council direct that the detailed design of the bridge be funded from Section 37 contributions or any other appropriate third party funding, with a zero net impact to the City, and be undertaken as soon as these funds become available.
3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the City Solicitor and the Ward Councillor, to report back to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the feasibility of proceeding with this project by way of a Local Improvement, or any other local financing mechanism, so that there are no long term capital costs to the city.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41890.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Harriet Meehan (PW.New.PW9.6.2)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Gui Rojas (PW.New.PW9.6.3)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Theresa and David Wright (PW.New.PW9.6.4)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Tim Petrullo (PW.New.PW9.6.5)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Peter Kiborn, Legal Counsel, Metro Ontario Inc. (PW.New.PW9.6.6)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-26406.pdf
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Patrick Dinnen (PW.New.PW9.6.7)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Joanne Boland (PW.New.PW9.6.8)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Kathryn Kwan (PW.New.PW9.6.9)
(November 3, 2011) Letter from Steven Heuchert and Denis Hunealt-Joffre, Board of Directors, TSCC 1847, The Argyle Lofts (PW.New.PW9.6.10)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-26642.pdf
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Joshua Platz (PW.New.PW9.6.11)
Communications (City Council)
(November 29, 2011) E-mail from Jeff Sawatzky (CC.New.PW9.6.13)
PW9.7 - Review of Paid Duty Officers' Traffic Control Assignments
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council revoke the existing Memorandum of Understanding: Guidelines for Paid Duty Police between Toronto Police Service and Transportation Services Division.
2. City Council approve the new Memorandum of Understanding: Guidelines for Road Occupancy Traffic Control outlined in Appendix A to the report (October 11, 2011) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, as amended by Parts 3 and 4 below.
3. City Council direct the General Manager of Transportation Services and the Chief of the Toronto Police Service to delete Clause 4 of Appendix A - Memorandum of Understanding: Guidelines for Road Occupancy and Traffic Control to the report (October 11, 2011) from the General Manager, Transportation Services and replace it with the following:
"4) a) Where a road emergency has occurred which, through its circumstances and conditions requires that the ensuing traffic control be provided by a police officer, this traffic control shall be provided by an on-duty officer until the emergency has passed.
b) If the emergency resolution will be lengthy and on-duty officers are required for other service duties, then staff of Toronto Transportation, Toronto Police and the associated contractor will collectively determine which subsequent traffic control can be provided by means other than an on-duty police officer.
4. City Council amend Appendix A - Memorandum of Understanding: Guidelines for Road Occupancy Traffic Control, to the report (October 11, 2011) from the General Manager, Transportation Services, to clarify how this Memorandum ought to apply to other emergencies requiring traffic control, by adding the following new Clause 5 under the heading "All Other Emergencies" and renumbering the subsequent Clauses:
ALL OTHER EMERGENCIES:
5. In the event of any other type of emergency which presents an immediate danger to the health or safety of any person, including but not limited to the failure of buildings or parts of buildings, due to events such as fires, explosions, circumstances resulting in the collapse of buildings or otherwise, and which results in the need for traffic control, the required traffic control shall be provided by on-duty police officers for the duration of the emergency.
Where the City Division(s) having jurisdiction over and managing the emergency determine(s) that the emergency has passed in that the immediate danger to the health or safety of persons is removed and that restoration of the site can be initiated, said Division(s) in conjunction with Toronto Police Service shall determine if continued traffic control is required, and if so, whether the continued traffic control should reasonably be provided by on-duty police officers or transferred to paid duty officers.
5. City Council request the General Manager of the Transportation Services Division to remove all references to paid duty officers from permits, guidelines, and documents granted/owned/managed/used by the Transportation Services Division and replace with appropriate traffic control requirements as summarized in Table 1 of the Memorandum of Understanding outlined in Appendix A to the report (October 11, 2011) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.
6. City Council request the Executive Director of Technical Services to remove all reference to paid duty officers from the “Standard Construction Specifications for Roads”, “Municipal Consent Requirements for the Installation of Plant Within City of Toronto Streets” and any other applicable document and replace with appropriate traffic control requirements as summarized in Table 1 of the Memorandum of Understanding outlined in Appendix A to the report (October 11, 2011) from the General Manager, Transportation Services.
7. City Council request the General Manager of the Transportation Services Division to meet quarterly in 2012 with the Toronto Police Service to review the progress in the implementation of the new traffic control requirements policy and report as needed to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.
8. City Council direct that:
a. the Transportation Services Division's approved construction plan be posted and maintained in a publicly visible location at all construction sites;
b. City of Toronto Site Inspection Officers report any concerns or requests for amendments to the approved construction plan and not permit any site changes until Transportation Services approves any revisions to the plan;
c. all paid duty officers or persons hired for traffic control at construction sites be given a copy of the transportation construction plan; and
d. public information be posted at every construction site indicating a City of Toronto number to call in regard to any traffic concerns related to that site.
9. City Council forward this Item to the Toronto Transit Commission, Toronto Hydro and the Toronto Association of Business Improvement Areas for their consideration of further cost saving opportunities through the reduction of reliance on paid duty officers.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41882.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42570.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(November 3, 2011) Submission from Miguel Avila (PW.New.PW9.7.2)
(November 3, 2011) Submission from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW9.7.3)
PW9.8 - Safety Enhancements - Winona Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- 17 - Davenport, 21 - St. Paul's
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the narrowing of Winona Drive, from a width of 8.9 metres to a width of 6.0 metres by the installation of a modular traffic island/planter box, on the east side of Winona Drive, from Glenhurst Avenue to a point 11.8 metres further north, generally as shown on the print of Drawing No. 421G-0413, dated July 2011 and attached to the report dated August 15, 2011, entitled, "Safety Enhancements – Winona Drive", from the General Manager, Transportation Services.
2. City Council approve the installation of two additional speed humps on Winona Drive in proximity to Premises No. 268 and between Premises Nos. 257/259, generally as shown on the print of Drawing No. 421G-0413, dated July 2011 and attached to the report dated August 15, 2011, entitled, "Safety Enhancements – Winona Drive", from the General Manager, Transportation Services.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41883.pdf
(October 18, 2011) Attachment 1 - Drawing No. 421G-0413 dated July 2011
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41884.pdf
PW9.9 - Feasibility of a Pilot Project for Separated Bicycle Lanes on Richmond Street and/or Adelaide Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services to initiate a Municipal Class Environmental Assessment study for separated bicycle lanes within the Richmond-Adelaide corridor, between Bathurst Street and Sherbourne Street, which could include consideration of a pilot project to install and evaluate separated bicycle lanes on the preferred alignment during the course of the study.
2. City Council direct that the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study for separated bicycle lanes within the Richmond-Adelaide corridor be limited to existing one-way road configurations, with the exception of the portions between University Avenue and Bathurst Street, and that the terms of reference for the environmental assessment include a consideration to examine converting Richmond Street and Adelaide Street, between University Avenue and Bathurst Street, back to two-way streets as a way of facilitating the installation of separated bike lanes on the street.
3. City Council authorize the General Manager of Transportation Services to initiate a second study to develop preferred bikeway route alignments to connect the future Richmond-Adelaide corridor bike lanes to existing bikeways east of the Don Valley, including, but not limited to, Dundas Street East, Eastern Avenue, and the Lake Shore Boulevard East path, as well as to the west of Bathurst Street to connect with bikeways on Strachan Avenue and Shaw Street.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41889.pdf
Communications (Committee)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Mark van Graft (PW.New.PW9.9.2)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Andrea Meynell (PW.New.PW9.9.3)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Dan Glassman (PW.New.PW9.9.4)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Adam Clare (PW.New.PW9.9.5)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from P. James Wright (PW.New.PW9.9.6)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Ben Wendt (PW.New.PW9.9.7)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Nicholas Sammond (PW.New.PW9.9.8)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Don Adams (PW.New.PW9.9.9)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Jonathan Bruce (PW.New.PW9.9.10)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from mce375@me.com (PW.New.PW9.9.11)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Daniel Comerford (PW.New.PW9.9.12)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Simon Strauss (PW.New.PW9.9.13)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Bev Leroux (PW.New.PW9.9.14)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Alex Bartlett (PW.New.PW9.9.15)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Frederic Fellouse (PW.New.PW9.9.16)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Jeff Quick (PW.New.PW9.9.17)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Nicholas Power (PW.New.PW9.9.18)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Colin Medley (PW.New.PW9.9.19)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Albet Koke and Carol Knibbe (PW.New.PW9.9.20)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Rodolfo Novak (PW.New.PW9.9.21)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Michael Black (PW.New.PW9.9.22)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Laura Krahn (PW.New.PW9.9.23)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Terrie Tucker (PW.New.PW9.9.24)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Fahmida Bhabha (PW.New.PW9.9.25)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Emily McCutcheon (PW.New.PW9.9.26)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from George Gray (PW.New.PW9.9.27)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Annalea Pippus (PW.New.PW9.9.28)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Glen Newbury (PW.New.PW9.9.29)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Greg Keast (PW.New.PW9.9.30)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Arden Beddoes (PW.New.PW9.9.31)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Mark Selick (PW.New.PW9.9.32)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Ian Flett (PW.New.PW9.9.33)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Jonathan Connor (PW.New.PW9.9.34)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Asher Miller (PW.New.PW9.9.35)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Joseph Byer (PW.New.PW9.9.36)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Paul Schreiber (PW.New.PW9.9.37)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Malika Sharma (PW.New.PW9.9.38)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Elizabeth Abbott (PW.New.PW9.9.39)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Erica Yudelman (PW.New.PW9.9.40)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Rebecca Webster (PW.New.PW9.9.41)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Cheryl Cohen (PW.New.PW9.9.42)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Grethe Jensen (PW.New.PW9.9.43)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Andrew Randell (PW.New.PW9.9.44)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Julie Scrivener (PW.New.PW9.9.45)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Lysa Toye (PW.New.PW9.9.46)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Tim Kirkwood (PW.New.PW9.9.47)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Kenneth Clarke (PW.New.PW9.9.48)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Naomi Campbell (PW.New.PW9.9.49)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Ashley Paton (PW.New.PW9.9.50)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Rolf V. Kenda (PW.New.PW9.9.51)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Pamela Marsales (PW.New.PW9.9.52)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Douglas de Gannes (PW.New.PW9.9.53)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Hanna Caplan (PW.New.PW9.9.54)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Gord Henning (PW.New.PW9.9.55)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Fuyuki Kurasawa (PW.New.PW9.9.56)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Margaret A. Oldfield (PW.New.PW9.9.57)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Gord Lemon (PW.New.PW9.9.58)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Dick Hemingway (PW.New.PW9.9.59)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Peter McCracken (PW.New.PW9.9.60)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Dr. Michaela Beder (PW.New.PW9.9.61)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Paul Reynolds (PW.New.PW9.9.62)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Baye Hunter (PW.New.PW9.9.63)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Peter Yu (PW.New.PW9.9.64)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Lynn Francis and Mark Lecker (PW.New.PW9.9.65)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Mike Olivier (PW.New.PW9.9.66)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Lynda Young (PW.New.PW9.9.67)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Kristine Connidis (PW.New.PW9.9.68)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Iva J. (PW.New.PW9.9.69)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Lisa Kucman (PW.New.PW9.9.70)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Paul Baines (PW.New.PW9.9.71)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from John Richardson (PW.New.PW9.9.72)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Dave Nodwell (PW.New.PW9.9.73)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from G. Cowieson (PW.New.PW9.9.74)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Gerard Masse (PW.New.PW9.9.75)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Alex Dumesle (PW.New.PW9.9.76)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from John Greenwood (PW.New.PW9.9.77)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from David Borenstein (PW.New.PW9.9.78)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Alyssa Ginsburg (PW.New.PW9.9.79)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Franziska Nonnenmann (PW.New.PW9.9.80)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Matthew Hayles (PW.New.PW9.9.81)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from David Saad (PW.New.PW9.9.82)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Kasia Mychajlowycz (PW.New.PW9.9.83)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Esther de Bruijn (PW.New.PW9.9.84)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Stuart Bustard (PW.New.PW9.9.85)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Theresa Cooke (PW.New.PW9.9.86)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Kevin Cherry (PW.New.PW9.9.87)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Nikolas MacLean (PW.New.PW9.9.88)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from John Bailey (PW.New.PW9.9.89)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Luke Champion (PW.New.PW9.9.90)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Laura Hawkins (PW.New.PW9.9.91)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Henry Wai (PW.New.PW9.9.92)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Sandra Kanagasabai (PW.New.PW9.9.93)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Carlos Tovar Schoener (PW.New.PW9.9.94)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from David Parsons (PW.New.PW9.9.95)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Teresa Kelly (PW.New.PW9.9.96)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Kathleen Maitland-Carter (PW.New.PW9.9.97)
(October 27, 2011) E-mail from Denis Agar (PW.New.PW9.9.98)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jody Smith (PW.New.PW9.9.99)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jonathan Thiang (PW.New.PW9.9.100)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Shauna C. Keddy (PW.New.PW9.9.101)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Blair Francey (PW.New.PW9.9.102)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Elliott Halpern (PW.New.PW9.9.103)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Aaron St. Bernard (PW.New.PW9.9.104)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Bertha Hughes (PW.New.PW9.9.105)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Reba Plummer (PW.New.PW9.9.106)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Donna Tozzi (PW.New.PW9.9.107)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Peter Foley (PW.New.PW9.9.108)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Bruce McDougall (PW.New.PW9.9.109)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Enza Trentadue (PW.New.PW9.9.110)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Sheila Miller (PW.New.PW9.9.111)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Adi Zeharia (PW.New.PW9.9.112)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Adam Harris (PW.New.PW9.9.113)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Antony Hilliard (PW.New.PW9.9.114)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Tom Worrall (PW.New.Pw9.9.115)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Scott Allan (PW.New.PW9.9.116)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Kate Hunter (PW.New.PW9.9.117)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Gary Sim (PW.New.PW9.9.118)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jamie Thiers (PW.New.PW9.9.119)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Daisy McCabe-Lokos (PW.New.PW9.9.120)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Zora Anaya (PW.New.PW9.9.121)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Glenn Attridge (PW.New.PW9.9.122)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Venetia Butler (PW.New.PW9.9.123)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Sedina Fiati (PW.New.PW9.9.124)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Trevor Keen (PW.New.PW9.9.125)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Michael Harding (PW.New.PW9.9.126)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Kathryn MacKay (PW.New.PW9.9.127)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Gabriel Sirois (PW.New.PW9.9.128)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Alexa Carson (PW.New.PW9.9.129)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Claire le Riche (PW.New.PW9.9.130)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Shouldice (PW.New.PW9.9.131)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Myers (PW.New.PW9.9.132)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Patrick Egan (PW.New.PW9.9.133)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Brian Hoeniger (PW.New.PW9.9.134)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Daniel Reis Galvao (PW.New.PW9.9.135)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Barrie Zwicker (PW.New.PW9.9.136)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Matt Johannsson (PW.New.PW9.9.137)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Sean Dewart (PW.New.PW9.9.138)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Randall Terada (PW.New.PW9.9.139)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Peter Crosby (PW.New.PW9.9.140)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Matan Volach (PW.New.PW9.9.141)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Tyrone Warner (PW.New.PW9.9.142)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Heather Davies (PW.New.PW9.9.143)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Amanda Landre (PW.New.PW9.9.144)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Cyril Almey (PW.New.PW9.9.145)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Annabel Reinis (PW.New.PW9.9.146)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Tanya De Mello (PW.New.PW9.9.147)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Heather Susan Neville (PW.New.PW9.9.148)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Sadia Butt (PW.New.PW9.9.149)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Alison Stewart (PW.New.PW9.9.150)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Peter Ledwon (PW.New.PW9.9.151)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Sandra Luccisano (PW.New.PW9.9.152)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jeremy Peter Jaber (PW.New.PW9.9.153)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Andrew Bray (PW.New.PW9.9.154)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Christina Doria (PW.New.PW9.9.155)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Karen Wilkinson (PW.New.PW9.9.156)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Dennis DaCosta (PW.New.PW9.9.157)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Keith Brooks (PW.New.PW9.9.158)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Lee Richmond (PW.New.PW9.9.159)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Bianca Arendt (PW.New.PW9.9.160)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Abbey Huggan (PW.New.PW9.9.161)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Zak Smith (PW.New.PW9.9.162)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Anna and George Prodanou (PW.New.PW9.9.163)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Peter Dietz (PW.New.PW9.9.164)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Norman Liu (PW.New.PW9.9.165)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jason Milligan (PW.New.PW9.9.166)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Andrea Davis (PW.New.PW9.9.167)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Dawn Buie (PW.New.PW9.9.168)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Ellen Rengers (PW.New.PW9.9.169)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Shuaib Alam (PW.New.PW9.9.170)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Michael Murphy (PW.New.PW9.9.171)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Daniel A. Gould (PW.New.PW9.9.172)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Tim Eddis (PW.New.PW9.9.173)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Roberto Garcia (PW.New.PW9.9.174)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Diane Creighton (PW.New.PW9.9.175)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Lu Bianco (PW.New.PW9.9.176)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Santiago Ferro (PW.New.PW9.9.177)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from John Provart (PW.New.PW9.9.178)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jean-Paul Lebert (PW.New.PW9.9.179)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Stephanie Vermeulen (PW.New.PW9.9.180)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Lauren Chang MaLean (PW.New.PW9.9.181)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Katherine Hong (PW.New.PW9.9.182)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Guy Marjerrison (PW.New.PW9.9.183)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Ruth Singer (PW.New.PW9.9.184)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Leslie Shulman (PW.New.PW9.9.185)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Kevin McLellan (PW.New.PW9.9.186)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Claire Coutu and Heather Gibson (PW.New.PW9.9.187)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Mia Macdonald (PW.New.PW9.9.188)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Denise Matchett (PW.New.PW9.9.189)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Isaac King (PW.New.PW9.9.190)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Den Ciul (PW.New.PW9.9.191)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Chantelle Campbell-Sholtzberg (PW.New.PW9.9.192)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Garrett (PW.New.PW9.9.193)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Mick O'Meara (PW.New.PW9.9.194)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Erin Lewis (PW.New.PW9.9.195)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Jacob Larsen (PW.New.PW9.9.196)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Bruce MacLean (PW.New.PW9.9.197)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from James R. Olchowy (PW.New.PW9.9.198)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Emily Watt (PW.New.PW9.9.199)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Paul Vendittelli (PW.New.PW9.9.200)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Hamish Greenland (PW.New.PW9.9.201)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Ben Bull (PW.New.PW9.9.202)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Molly Crealock (PW.New.PW9.9.203)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Julia Greenbaum (PW.New.PW9.9.204)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Herrie ten Cate (PW.New.PW9.9.205)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Mark Gordon (PW.New.PW9.9.206)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Mike Donald (PW.New.PW9.9.207)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Laura Mayo (PW.New.PW9.9.208)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Gary Pereira (PW.New.PW9.9.209)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Vivien Leong (PW.New.PW9.9.210)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Marko Balan (PW.New.PW9.9.211)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Mark Kozar (PW.New.PW9.9.212)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Craig Saila (PW.New.PW9.9.213)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Michael Cosby (PW.New.PW9.9.214)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Giselle De Grandis (PW.New.PW9.9.215)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Dwight S. Huggins (PW.New.PW9.9.216)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Nishit Shah (PW.New.PW9.9.217)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Chris Gapski (PW.New.PW9.9.218)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Norma Dvorsky (PW.New.PW9.9.219)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Laurie Ward (PW.New.PW9.9.220)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from James and Barbara Dalziel (PW.New.PW9.9.221)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Grant Wood (PW.New.PW9.9.222)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Ernest Meili (PW.New.PW9.9.223)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Michael Lottamoza (PW.New.PW9.9.224)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Daniel Girard (PW.New.PW9.9.225)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Thomas Berry (PW.New.PW9.9.226)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Vincent de Tourdonnet (PW.New.PW9.9.227)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Arleigh Crawford (PW.New.PW9.9.228)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Deborah Sabadash (PW.New.PW9.9.229)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Anthony Mohamed (PW.New.PW9.9.230)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Annie Gibson (PW.New.PW9.9.231)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Maureen Kelly (PW.New.PW9.9.232)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Marcelo Hamer (PW.New.PW9.9.233)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Melina Giannelia (PW.New.PW9.9.234)
(October 29, 2011) Submission from Peter Clarke (PW.New.PW9.9.235)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Rob Shirkey (PW.New.PW9.9.236)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Cassidy Boulan (PW.New.PW9.9.237)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Aaron Severn (PW.New.PW9.9.238)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Sandy Yuen (PW.New.PW9.9.239)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Robert J. Brodey (PW.New.PW9.9.240)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Chris Boynton (PW.New.PW9.9.241)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Sam Bootsma (PW.New.PW9.9.242)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Blair O'Connor (PW.New.PW9.9.243)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Fiona Buchanan (PW.New.PW9.9.244)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Susan Reid (PW.New.PW9.9.245)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Jaclyn Law (PW.New.PW9.9.246)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Shuchi Stanger (PW.New.PW9.9.247)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from George Court (PW.New.PW9.9.248)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Murray D. Lumley (PW.New.PW9.9.249)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Kelly Carmichael (PW.New.PW9.9.250)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Jenna Winter (PW.New.PW9.9.251)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Ted Parkinson (PW.New.PW9.9.252)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Mark Cooper (PW.New.PW9.9.253)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Adriana Mugnatto-Hamu (PW.New.PW9.9.254)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Tim Eddis (PW.New.PW9.9.255)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Frank Rooney (PW.New.PW9.9.256)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Paul Widmer (PW.New.PW9.9.257)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Tonya Surman (PW.New.PW9.9.258)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Tanya Smith (PW.New.PW9.9.259)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Judith Rae (PW.New.PW9.9.260)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Patricia Clune (PW.New.PW9.9.261)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Pawel Terek (PW.New.PW9.9.262)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Peter Low (PW.New.PW9.9.263)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Martin Mostert (PW.New.PW9.9.264)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Rebecca Dalfen (PW.New.PW9.9.265)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Lisa Jayne (PW.New.PW9.9.266)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Bruce Bonaney (PW.New.PW9.9.267)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Janine Miedzik (PW.New.PW9.9.268)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from John Tabone (PW.New.PW9.9.269)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Stephannie Roy (PW.New.PW9.9.270)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Mark Franklin (PW.New.PW9.9.271)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Patricia and Charley Scrivener (PW.New.PW9.9.272)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Sanja Stanojevic (PW.New.PW9.9.273)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Ashlee Cooper (PW.New.PW9.9.274)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Francis Ouellette (PW.New.PW9.9.275)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Katrina Easton (PW.New.PW9.9.276)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Kyla Smith (PW.New.PW9.9.277)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Fernando Flores-Mangas (PW.New.PW9.9.278)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Louis George (PW.New.PW9.9.279)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Kris Langille (PW.New.PW9.9.280)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Sarah Miller (PW.New.PW9.9.281)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Peter Raynes (PW.New.PW9.9.282)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Jason Woodman (PW.New.PW9.9.283)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Barb Bower (PW.New.PW9.9.284)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Isil Gilderdale (PW.New.PW9.9.285)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Raj M. Bharati (PW.New.PW9.9.286)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Linda (PW.New.PW9.9.287)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Matt Schiller (PW.New.PW9.9.288)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Herb van den Dool (PW.New.PW9.9.289)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Michael Steinberg (PW.New.PW9.9.290)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Margot Clayton Jones (PW.New.PW9.9.291)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Tim Gray (PW.New.PW.9.9.292)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from M. Arkin (PW.New.PW9.9.293)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Michael Buyers (PW.New.PW9.9.294)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Elizabeth Chrumka (PW.New.PW9.9.295)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Cliff Mewdell (PW.New.PW9.9.296)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Ava Kotler (PW.New.PW9.9.297)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Mitch Adams (PW.New.PW9.9.298)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Wendy Gillis (PW.New.PW9.9.299)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Barbi Lazarus (PW.New.PW9.9.300)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Nina Hartt (PW.New.PW9.9.301)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from David Simmons (PW.New.PW9.9.302)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Chuck Castillo (PW.New.PW9.9.303)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Gayle Roodman (PW.New.PW9.9.304)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Shanny (PW.New.PW9.9.305)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Mary Anne Miller (PW.New.PW9.9.306)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Mike Prokopec (PW.New.PW9.9.307)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Alex Bowron (PW.New.PW9.9.308)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Rose Eckhardt (PW.New.PW9.9.309)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Mark Kiteley (PW.New.PW9.9.310)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Sadie Yancey (PW.New.PW9.9.311)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Dorian Logan (PW.New.PW9.9.312)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Sarah Elton (PW.New.PW9.9.313)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Dave Germiquet (PW.New.PW9.9.314)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Corey Sullivan (PW.New.PW9.9.315)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Alain Saleh (PW.New.PW9.9.316)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Fatima Jaffer (PW.New.PW9.9.317)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Clara Romero (PW.New.PW9.9.318)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Ben Schachter (PW.New.PW9.9.319)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Gabriele Janes (PW.New.PW9.9.320)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Molly Bannerman (PW.New.PW9.9.321)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Ben Hatcher (PW.New.PW9.9.322)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Jordan Duerrstein (PW.New.PW9.9.323)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Peter F. Kiborn (PW.New.PW9.9.324)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Wayne Mittlestead (PW.New.PW9.9.325)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Albert Allen (PW.New.PW9.9.326)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Coggon (PW.New.PW9.9.327)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Anne Burbidge (PW.New.PW9.9.328)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Jamie Wilson (PW.New.PW9.9.329)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Neil Park (PW.New.PW9.9.330)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Jaddon Park (PW.New.PW9.9.331)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Patrick Dinnen (PW.New.PW9.9.332)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Tom Flaherty (PW.New.PW9.9.333)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Leya Barry (PW.New.PW9.9.334)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Joanne Boland (PW.New.PW9.9.335)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Sean Hayes (PW.New.PW9.9.336)
(November 2, 2011) Submission from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW9.9.337)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Councillor Paula Fletcher (Ward 30 - Toronto Danforth) (PW.New.PW9.9.338)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-26570.pdf
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Gloria Jean Campbell (PW.New.PW9.9.339)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Lisa Quirke (PW.New.PW9.9.340)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Joshua van Amerom (PW.New.PW9.9.341)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Kris Forge (PW.New.PW9.9.342)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Don Cameron (PW.New.PW9.89.343)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Christopher Bozek (PW.New.PW9.9.344)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Sharon Yetman (PW.New.PW9.9.345)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Stephen Da Cambra (PW.New.PW9.9.346)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Siobhan Bout (PW.New.PW9.9.347)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Craig Barnes (PW.New.PW9.9.348)
(November 3, 2011) Letter from Councillor Pam McConnell (PW.New.PW9.9.349)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/comm/communicationfile-26639.pdf
(November 3, 2011) Submission from Wayne Scott (PW.New.PW9.9.350)
(November 3, 2011) Submission from Hamish Wilson (PW.New.PW9.9.351)
Communications (City Council)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Niles (CC.Main.PW9.9.353)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Marco Pagliarulo (CC.Main.PW9.9.354)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Anne Carbert (CC.Main.PW9.9.355)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Sammy Davis-Mendelow (CC.Main.PW9.9.356)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Peter Clarke (CC.Main.PW9.9.357)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Lyn Adamson (CC.Main.PW9.9.358)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Monica Nowierski (CC.Main.PW9.9.359)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Tristan Gough (CC.Main.PW9.9.360)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Mike T. (CC.Main.PW9.9.361)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from James Sandham (CC.Main.PW9.9.362)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Desiree Proveau (CC.Main.PW9.9.363)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from James Monaghan (CC.Main.PW9.9.364)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Christopher Grouios (CC.Main.PW9.9.365)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from April Aliermo (CC.Main.PW9.9.366)
(November 3, 2011) E-mail from Paul Ianni (CC.Main.PW9.9.367)
(November 12, 2011) E-mail from Jennifer Denomme (CC.Main.PW9.9.368)
(November 20, 2011) E-mail from Hal Beck (CC.Main.PW9.9.369)
Declared Interests (City Council)
Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam - as she owns a business on Richmond Street West.
PW9.10 - Amendments to Chapter 743, "Use of Streets and Sidewalks," of the Toronto Municipal Code - Final Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, deferred consideration of Item PW9.10 to the next regular City Council meeting on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor to consider the items remaining on the agenda.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council on December 1, 2011 adopted a motion to defer any remaining Items on the agenda to the next regular meeting of City Council on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor for that purpose.
The following Items were subsequently deferred:
Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG9.11
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.5
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.10
New Business Item CC14.7, and
Member Motion MM14.28
Public Notice Given
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41886.pdf
(October 20, 2011) Attachment No. 1 - Draft By-law
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41983.pdf
(October 20, 2011) Attachment No. 2 - Recommended Revisions to Chapter 743 of the Toronto Municipal Code
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-41984.pdf
Communications (City Council)
(November 5, 2011) E-mail from Matt Stata (CC.Main.PW9.10.2)
(November 29, 2011) Letter from Margaret Vandenbroucke, Chair, Advocacy Committee, Multifaith Alliance to End Homelessness (CC.New.PW9.10.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27070.pdf
PW9.12 - Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge Alternative Design
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 19 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the construction of the Fort York Pedestrian Bridge with a visually appealing design consistent with either Alternative A1, A2 or A5, which provide an inclined arch support system based pedestrian bridge consistent with the original pedestrian bridge design but at reduced costs.
2. City Council authorize the Executive Director, Technical Services, the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, the Acting Director, Waterfront Secretariat, and the Chief Corporate Officer to work with Build Toronto, and its development partners, to incorporate the design and construction of a pedestrian bridge, on behalf of the City, consistent with the planning objectives outlined in the report (November 1, 2011) from the Executive Director, Technical Services, and in conjunction with the area development.
3. City Council request that the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, consider the master plan being developed for the Ordnance triangle lands as part of the 5 year review Official Plan and the Municipal Comprehensive Review currently being undertaken and that the result be reported to Planning and Growth Management Committee no later than June 2012.
4. City Council direct the appropriate staff to strongly consider using Section 37 funds raised through the development of the property within the Ordnance Triangle lands to offset the costs of the Fort York Bridge.
Origin
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-42136.pdf
(November 1, 2011) Attachments to the report from the Executive Director, Technical Services - Alternatives A1 to A5
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-42137.pdf
(November 3, 2011) Staff Presentation on Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge - Alternative Design
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/pw/bgrd/backgroundfile-42144.pdf
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-26919.pdf
(November 24, 2011) E-mail from Sybil McEnteer (CC.Supp.PW9.12.2)
Etobicoke York Community Council - Meeting 11
EY11.1 - Naming of Private Lanes located east of Torbarrie Road, between Judy Sgro Avenue and Sergio Marchi Street, as "Ted Wray Circle", "Odoardo Di Santo Circle", "Adam Oates Heights" and "Jason Allison Lane"
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 7 - York West
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor, as follows:
a. The private lanes located east of Torbarrie Road, between Judy Sgro Avenue and Sergio Marchi Street are hereby named "Ted Wray Circle”, "Odoardo Di Santo Circle", "Adam Oates Heights" and "Jason Allison Lane", as shown on Attachment No. 1 to this By-law.
b. The Conservatory Group pay the estimated cost of $4,200.00 for the fabrication and installation of the street name signs.
c. The owners of the subject lands, their agents or successors, shall maintain, at their own risk, the signage installed under section 2 of this By-law.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41588.pdf
EY11.2 - Final Report - 700 Trethewey Drive - Common Elements Condominium Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 12 - York South-Weston
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium for the lands at 700 Trethewey Drive, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (August 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 3 to the report (August 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, which except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
2. City Council direct that confirmation be provided by the applicant and verified by the City Solicitor that a Section 118 restriction under the Land Titles Act has been registered for the lands.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41590.pdf
EY11.4 - Final Report - 636 Evans Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the Zoning By-law for the lands at 636 Evans Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 5 to the report (October 14, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act for a $50,000 contribution towards local park and community improvements.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41634.pdf
EY11.5 - Final Report - 5415, 5421-5429, 5453, 5475, 5481, 5485 and 5487 Dundas Street West and 15 and 25 Shorncliffe Road - Zoning Amendment and Removal of an “H” (Holding Symbol) Applications
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 5415, 5421-5429, 5453, 5475, 5481 and 15 and 25 Shorncliffe Road (Dunshorn Holdings) substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as described in the report dated October 17, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 5485 and 5487 Dundas Street West (Alder Place) substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as described in the report dated October 17, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owners to enter into individual Agreements pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreements are as follows:
i. $1,250,000 from the Owner of Dunshorn to be used for improvements, above base condition as established by Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to the new park to be created on the Dunshorn site and/or for improvements to Cloverdale Park, paid prior to the issuance of an above-grade building permit, and indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto from the date of execution of the Section 37 agreement to the date of payment.
ii. $250,000 from the Owner of Alder Place to be used for improvements, above base condition as established by Parks, Forestry and Recreation, to the new park to be created on the Dunshorn site and/or for improvements to Cloverdale Park, paid prior to the issuance of an above grade building permit, and indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto from the date of execution of the Section 37 agreement to the date of payment.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreements as a legal convenience to support development:
i. The provision of easements in favour of the City as required for the transit reserve and the private roads at the time of Site Plan Approval;
ii. Details of an arrangement among Dunshorn, Alder Place and the City regarding financing and construction of required infrastructure improvements, including sewer, water supply, storm water management, traffic and road facilities, and transit priority signalling satisfactory to the Executive Director of Technical Services and the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District;
iii. Arrangements to secure a 3.44 metre wide land dedication for road purposes along the east side of Shorncliffe Road from the owner of Alder Place at the time of Site Plan Approval; and
iv. The Owners shall construct and maintain the developments in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require:
a. the Owners of the Dunshorn property to:
i. finalize the Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services;
ii. finalize the Traffic Impact Study to the satisfaction of the Director, Transportation Services and the Director, Transportation Planning, City Planning Division; and
iii. fulfill the following conditions related to the Air Quality Assessment (AQA) to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District:
a. the AQA prepared by Dunshorn has been completed;
b. a third-party Peer Review of the AQA for the City, at Dunshorn’s expense, has been satisfactorily completed; and
c. written confirmation has been received from Dunshorn’s consulting engineer that the off-site mitigation measures recommended to support the development proposal, if any, have been completed, are operational and have been demonstrated to mitigate air quality and odour impacts to acceptable Ministry of the Environment requirements and/or other arrangements to achieve the outcome noted herein, including financial and implementation arrangements between the odour-emitting industry(s) impacting the development and Dunshorn have been made, all to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
b. the Owners of the Alder Place property to:
i. finalize the Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services;
ii. finalize the Traffic Impact Study to the satisfaction of the Director, Transportation Services and the Director, Transportation Planning, City Planning Division; and
iii. provide a Revised Pedestrian Wind Study, to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
c. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the Owners of Dunshorn and Alder Place to enter into an agreement with each other, and register same on title of all the relevant properties, regarding negotiation and, if necessary, arbitration, of conditions relating to access to, construction, and maintenance of the Private Road, all to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, provided that, should such agreement and registration not be achieved by December 31, 2011, the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District will further report to the Etobicoke York Community Council at its meeting of January 10, 2012.
6. City Council authorize the Bills related to Dunshorn to proceed to City Council independently of Alder Place's Bills, if necessary.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41741.pdf
Draft Zoning By-law - To amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code and By-law 1088-2002, as amended, with respect to the lands municipally known as 5415, 5421-5429, 5453, 5475, 5481 Dundas Street West and 15 and 25 Shorncliffe Road and to remove the holding symbol (H) with respect to the lands known municipally as 5415 and 5421-5429 Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42106.pdf
Draft Zoning By-law - To amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code and By-law 1088-2002, as amended, with respect to the lands municipally known as 5485 and 5487 Dundas Street West
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42074.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26218.pdf
(October 31, 2011) Letter from Ray Davies, Real Estate Strategy Manager, Ontario Power Generation regarding Rezoning Application No. 11 107405 05 OZ (5485-5487 Dundas Street West) (EY.New.EY11.5.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26219.pdf
(November 1, 2011) Letter from Anna Visocchi (EY.New.EY11.5.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26220.pdf
(November 1, 2011) Letter from David Spencer, Baker Schneider Ruggiero, LLP (EY.New.EY11.5.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26391.pdf
(November 2, 2011) Submission from Michael Goldberg, Principal, Goldberg Group, headed "Location & Context, Dunshorn Holdings Inc." (EY.New.EY11.5.5)
EY11.6 - Final Report - 1030 and1040 Islington Avenue - Zoning Amendment and Subdivision Applications
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the former City of Etobicoke Zoning Code for the lands at 1030 and 1040 Islington Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as described in the report dated October 17, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the Owner to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreements are as follows:
i. $100,000.00 cash contribution to the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (XR10-12) towards the purchase of the land for the expansion of Fairfield Park, paid prior to the issuance of an above grade building permit, and indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment; and
ii. $25,000.00 cash contribution towards improvements to Fairfield Park.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreements as a legal convenience to support development:
i. Funding from the Owner for turning lane improvements required at the eastbound approach to Norseman Street and Islington Avenue;
ii. The provision of noise attenuation measures as detailed in the Environmental Noise Feasibility Study dated June 2, 2011;
iii. Agreement to permanently remove the existing drive-through facilities from the building at 1048 Islington Avenue if the current use (TD Bank) is changed; and
iv. The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009 through the adoption of Item PG32.3 of the Planning and Growth Committee.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to:
i. finalize the Functional Servicing Report to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services; and
ii. fulfill the following conditions related to the Ambient Air Quality Assessment Study (AAQAS) to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District:
a. a third-party Peer Review of the AAQAS for the City has been satisfactorily completed; and,
b. written confirmation has been received from the proponent’s consulting engineer that the off-site mitigation measures recommended to support the development proposal, if any, have been completed, are operational and have been demonstrated to mitigate air quality and odour impacts to acceptable Ministry of the Environment requirements and/or other arrangements to achieve the outcome noted herein, including financial and implementation arrangements between the odour-emitting industry(s) impacting the development and the development proponent have been made, all to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
5. City Council direct that all additional cash-in-lieu of parkland funds collected as a result of the Alternative Parkland Dedication policy be directed to the Land Acquisition Reserve Fund (XR10-12).
6. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment 4 to the report dated October 17, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 9 to the report dated October 17, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District which, except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41711.pdf
Draft By-law - To amend the Etobicoke Zoning Code, as amended, with respect to the Lands municipally known as 1030 and 1040 Islington Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42027.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26325.pdf
(November 2, 2011) Submission from Barry Horosko, Bratty & Partners, headed "Norseman-Islington, Mantella Corporation, Design Concept Package" (EY.New.EY11.6.2)
EY11.7 - Request for Direction Report - 25 Vickers Road, 5555 and 5559 Dundas Street West and 10 Shorncliffe Road - Zoning Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with the Chief Planner and other appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the position outlined in the report dated October 31, 2011, from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District.
2. City Council request the Ontario Municipal Board withhold its Order on the Zoning By-law Amendment appeals until the related Official Plan Amendment appeals are withdrawn or resolved.
3. City Council confirm that the Zoning By-law Amendments to permit the redevelopment of the properties at 5555 Dundas Street West, 10 Shorncliffe Road, 5559 Dundas Street West and 25 Vickers Road, be in accordance with the principles set forth in the report (October 31, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, with the details to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and City Solicitor in consultation with the Executive Director, Technical Services.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and any other appropriate City staff to take such actions as necessary to give effect to Parts 1 to 3 above.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42066.pdf
(October 17, 2011) Notice of Pending Report regarding a Rezoning Application at 25 Vickers Road, 5555 and 5559 Dundas Street West and 10 Shorncliffe Road.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41779.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26389.pdf
(November 1, 2011) Letter from Steven J. O'Melia, Miller Thomson LLP (EY.New.EY11.7.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26397.pdf
(November 1, 2011) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP (EY.New.EY11.7.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26400.pdf
EY11.8 - Consultant's Report - Etobicoke Centre Public Space and Streetscape Plan
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council endorse the vision put forward in "The Etobicoke Centre Public Space and Streetscape Plan" (September 2011) and support, in principle, the projects and initiatives identified in this plan to incrementally improve the quality and character of public space in the Etobicoke Centre.
2. City Council direct the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, along with other relevant City officials, to pursue the implementation of the incremental improvements identified in "The Etobicoke Centre Public Space and Streetscape Plan" at every opportunity, including those presented through the development approval process and the City's capital works program.
3. City Council direct that the strategies and implementation tools identified in the report (October 13, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Etobicoke York District, be extended to apply to the Dundas Street West corridor up to Highway 427 to achieve a consistent streetscape design with the Etobicoke City Centre area.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41569.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 1, 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42022.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 3 Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42023.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 3 Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42024.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 3 Part 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42028.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 4, 5, 6, 7, Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42029.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 7 Part 2
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42030.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 7 Part 3
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42031.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 7 Part 4, Ch 8 Part 1
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42032.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 8 Part 2, Ch 9
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42033.pdf
Etobicoke Centre Public Space & Streetscape Plan - Ch 10 Appendices
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42034.pdf
EY11.17 - Closing the Existing Pedestrian Connection at the south limit of Windsor Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 2 - Etobicoke North
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council close the existing pedestrian connection at the south limit of Windsor Road, and authorize and direct the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, to install a chain link fence 1.8 metres in height across the opening in the existing fence.
Public Notice Given
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41640.pdf
Attachment 1 - Photograph, Attachment 2 - Aerial Photograph
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41641.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(November 2, 2011) Petition from Councillor Doug Ford, containing the signatures of approximately 121 residents of Windsor Road and Kingsview Village (EY.New.EY11.17.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/comm/communicationfile-26605.pdf
EY11.20 - U-Turn Prohibition - Black Creek Drive at Lawrence Avenue West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 12 - York South-Weston
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve a "U-turn Prohibition, Anytime" for southbound traffic on Black Creek Drive at Lawrence Avenue West.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41608.pdf
Attachment 1 - Area Map.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41609.pdf
EY11.24 - Parking Regulation Amendments - Royal York Road, north of Bloor Street West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the removal of the "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on the east side of Royal York Road between Bloor Street West and Varley Lane.
2. City Council approve the installation of a "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on the east side of Royal York Road between Bloor Street West and a point 26 metres north of Bloor Street West.
3. City Council approve the installation of a "No Stopping Anytime" regulation on the east side of Royal York Road between the second laneway north of Bloor Street West and Varley Lane.
4. City Council approve the installation of a “Taxi Stand" for one taxicab on the east side of Royal York Road between a point 26 metres north of Bloor Street West and the first laneway north of Bloor Street West.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41596.pdf
Attachment 1 - Area Map.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41597.pdf
EY11.26 - Parking Regulation Amendment - Torbarrie Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 7 - York West
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Schedule VIII of By-law No. 31001, of the former City of North York, by deleting the "No Parking 12:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m." regulation on the east side of Torbarrie Road from Judy Sgro Avenue to a point 242 metres south of Judy Sgro Avenue.
2. City Council amend Schedule X of By-law No. 31001, of the former City of North York, by installing 12 hour permitted parking, from 8:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m., on the east side of Torbarrie Road from Judy Sgro Avenue to a point 242 metres south of Judy Sgro Avenue.
3. City Council amend Schedule “A” of By-Law 30662, of the former City of North York, by installing 12 hour permitted parking from 8:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m., anytime, on the east side of Torbarrie Road from Judy Sgro Avenue to a point 242 metres south of Judy Sgro Avenue.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41757.pdf
Attachment 1 - Map with existing regulations, Attachment 2 - Map with proposed regulations
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-41758.pdf
EY11.31 - Cloverdale Road - Proactive Enforcement Measures
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 17 - Davenport
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the Chief of Police to increase patrols on Cloverdale Road given the level of complaints regarding drug trafficking, prostitution, and illegal activities, including those related to an illegal booze can at 1754 St. Clair Avenue West.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-42139.pdf
North York Community Council - Meeting 11
NY11.6 - Amendment to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918 - Ward 16 Specific Modifications
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 918, Parking on Residential Front Yards and Boulevards, to provide:
a. that §918-8 C(2) and §918-8 C(3) shall not apply to front yard parking applications for front yard parking for residential properties located within the area of the former City of Toronto in Ward 16 where:
i. the application is for a front yard parking pad adjacent to an existing mutual driveway which has a width of less than 2.2 metres measured at the narrowest point;
ii. additional ramping is not required or, if additional ramping is required, there is no loss of an on-street permit parking space; and
iii. the property meets all other requirements of Chapter 918.
b. that §918-9D and §918-9E shall not apply to a front yard parking pad in the area of the former City of Toronto in Ward 16 where additional ramping is not required.
2. City Council authorize staff to introduce in Council any bills that may be necessary to give effect to Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41823.pdf
NY11.7 - Northbound Through Prohibition/Northbound Right Turn On Red Prohibition - Yorkdale Road and William R. Allen Road - Highway 401 On Ramp
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the northbound through prohibition at the intersection of Yorkdale Road and William R. Allen Road/Highway 401 on ramp.
2. City Council approve the northbound right turn on red prohibition at the intersection of Yorkdale Road and William R. Allen Road/ Highway 401 on ramp.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41654.pdf
(October 13, 2011) Attachment 1 - Map - Yorkdale Rd at W. R. Allen Rd Underpass/Yorkdale Mall - Through Prohibition and No Right Turn on Red Prohibition
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41655.pdf
(October 13, 2011) Attachment 2 - Map - Yorkdale Rd at W. R. Allen Rd Underpass - Yorkdale Mall - Road Alteration
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41656.pdf
NY11.9 - 40 km/h Speed Zone - Northwest Quadrant of Bathurst Street/Wilson Avenue Community
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Allingham Gardens from Charleswood Drive to Bathurst Street.
2. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Banton Road from Clanton Park Road to Palm Drive.
3. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Barclay Road from De Quincy Boulevard to Charleswood Drive.
4. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Bonnacord Drive from Clanton Park Road to Palm Drive.
5. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Brett Avenue from Clanton Park Road to Palm Drive.
6. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Charleswood Drive from King High Avenue to Bathurst Street.
7. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Corwin Crescent from King High Avenue to Laurelcrest Avenue.
8. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Delia Court from the north limit of Delia Court to Palm Drive.
9. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on De Quincy Boulevard from Wigan Crescent to King High Avenue.
10. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Erica Avenue from Palm Drive to the east limit of Erica Avenue.
11. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Faith Avenue from Wilson Heights Boulevard to Faywood Boulevard.
12. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Geddes Court from the north limit of Geddes Court to Palm Drive.
13. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Goodwill Avenue from Wilson Heights Boulevard to Faywood Boulevard.
14. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Graymar Avenue from De Quincy Boulevard to Allingham Gardens.
15. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Josephine Road from Clanton Park Road to Palm Drive.
16. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Kainona Avenue from Almore Avenue to Clanton Park Road.
17. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Lowesmoor Avenue from Almore Avenue to Clanton Park Road.
18. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Midvale Road from Clanton Park Road to Clanton Park Road.
19. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Model Avenue from Wilson Heights Boulevard to Faywood Boulevard.
20. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Palm Drive from the west limit of Palm Drive to Bathurst Street.
21. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Redmount Road from King High Avenue to Palm Drive.
22. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Robbie Avenue from King High Avenue to Graymar Avenue.
23. City Council approve the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Wigan Crescent from De Quincy Boulevard to King High Avenue.
24. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Almington Street from Invermay Avenue to Laurelcrest Avenue.
25. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Almont Road from De Quincy Boulevard to Charleswood Drive.
26. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Almore Avenue from Faywood Boulevard to Bathurst Street.
27. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Ansford Avenue from Wilson Heights Boulevard to Faywood Boulevard.
28. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Clanton Park Road from Wilson Heights Boulevard to the east limit of Clanton Park Road.
29. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Dorchester Drive from Almore Avenue to Clanton Park Road.
30. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Faywood Boulevard from Model Avenue to Wilson Avenue.
31. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Gladiola Court from the north limit of Gladiola Court to Clanton Park Road.
32. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on King High Avenue from Invermay Avenue to Wilson Avenue.
33. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Rosseau Road from Invermay Avenue to Laurelcrest Avenue.
34. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Silverton Avenue from Invermay Avenue to Laurelcrest Avenue.
35. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Sunbeam Avenue from Wilson Heights Boulevard to Faywood Boulevard.
36. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on Vinci Crescent from Faywood Boulevard to Faywood Boulevard.
37. City Council deny the installation of a 40 km/h speed zone on York Downs Drive from Almore Avenue to Bathurst Street.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41650.pdf
(October 12, 2011) Attachment - Map - Northwest Quadrant of Bathurst St/Wilson Avenue Community - 40 km/h speed limit
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41651.pdf
NY11.10 - Traffic Flow - 40km/h Speed Limit, Traffic Control Signals - Pedestrian Crossings - Wilson Heights Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Referred
- Ward:
- 10 - York Centre
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, referred Item NY11.10 back to the North York Community Council for further consideration.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41664.pdf
(October 13, 2011) Attachment 1 - Map - Wilson Heights Blvd - 40 km/h Speed Zone
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41665.pdf
(October 13, 2011) Attachment 2 - 50 km/h Maximum Speed Limit Warrant - Wilson Heights Blvd
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41666.pdf
(October 13, 2011) Attachment 3 - 40 km/h Maximum Speed Limit Warrant - Wilson Heights Blvd
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41667.pdf
NY11.12 - Accessible On-Street Parking Space - Vaughan Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of one accessible on-street parking space on the north side of Vaughan Road from a point 33 metres west of Bude Street to a point 5.5 metres further west.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41678.pdf
(October 11, 2011) Attachment - Map - Vaughan Rd - Accessible On-Street Parking Space
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41679.pdf
NY11.13 - Transportation Study - 58-68 Orchard View Boulevard and 439-445 Duplex Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council receive the report (October 13, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, North York District, for information.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41797.pdf
(October 13, 2011) Attachment - Map - 58-68 Orchardview Blvd, Traffic Studies, 439-445 Duplex Av
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41798.pdf
NY11.15 - Installation of Traffic Control Signals - Laird Drive at Esandar Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of Laird Drive and Esandar Drive.
2. City Council approve the removal of the existing pedestrian crossover (PXO) at the intersection of Laird Drive and Lea Avenue.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41644.pdf
Attachment - Map - Laird Drive at Esandar Drive - Traffic Control Signals
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41645.pdf
NY11.20 - Final Report - Partial Removal of the Holding (H) Symbol - 2075 Bayview Avenue, Sunnybrook Hospital
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 substantially in accordance with the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (October 14, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the Draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council require the applicant to obtain Notice of Approval Conditions of Site Plan Approval before the necessary Bills are introduced to City Council for enactment.
4. City Council request the applicant to consider facilitating the City's needs for an EMS Station on the site at 2075 Bayview Avenue.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41724.pdf
Communications (City Council)
NY11.21 - Request for Direction Report - Official Plan & Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - 16 Lesmill Road and 840-842 York Mills Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 34 - Don Valley East
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to continue to negotiate with the applicant to resolve the outstanding issues discussed in the report (October 13, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the proposed development subject to resolution of the following issues as detailed in the report (October 13, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, and set out below:
a. the applicant address the retail market impact and employment area impact policies of the Official Plan to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District;
b. the applicant address the urban design issues outlined in the report (October 13, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District; and
c. that satisfactory internal driveway connections be secured between this site and the adjacent site at 850-858 York Mills Road, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Transportation Services Division.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to request the Ontario Municipal Board to withhold its Order approving the Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendments until:
a. the Owner addresses the servicing and transportation requirements outlined in the memorandum dated September 16, 2011 to the satisfaction of the Director, Development Engineering, Technical Services Division;
b. appropriate Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are prepared to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor; and
c. the Owner has submitted a site plan control application to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41607.pdf
NY11.22 - Final Report - Rezoning Application - 127 and 129 Laird Drive and 4A, 6 and 8 Industrial Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 26 - Don Valley West
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend former Town of Leaside Zoning By-law 1916, for the lands at 127 and 129 Laird Drive and 4A, 6 and 8 Industrial Street and a portion of Markham Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (October 14, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require that:
a. the owner enter into a Section 37 Agreement to secure matters pertaining to:
i. The proposed landscaped centre median on Laird Drive and that the applicant provide a certified cheque, to the satisfaction of the Director, City Planning, North York District and the Director, Transportation Services, equal to the construction cost of a median in Laird Drive along the frontage of the site.
b. a Site Plan Notice of Approval Conditions be issued by the Director, Community Planning, North York District, which conditions should also include the following:
"That the applicant enter into an agreement to purchase a portion of Markham Avenue east of Laird Drive following Council's authorization to close and sell this portion of Markham Avenue."
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41698.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(November 2, 2011) Fax from Paul H. Martin, President, Del Equipment Limited (NY.New.NY11.22.2)
(November 2, 2011) Letter from JP Kovac and Paul Kmet, Gyro Mazda (NY.New.NY11.22.3)
(November 1, 2011) Letter from Ken Hearn, National Dealer Development Manager, Hyundai Auto Canada Corp. (NY.New.NY11.22.4)
NY11.23 - Final Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - 18 - 26 Rean Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 18-26 Rean Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 11 to the report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
2. City Council amend former City of North York Zoning By-law No. 7625 for the lands at 18-26 Rean Drive substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 12 to the report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner and Executive Director of City Planning, to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and/or draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required to give effect to the recommendations contained in the report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District.
4. City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of Above Base Park Improvements to a proposed 272m² parkette to be conveyed to the City to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation. The development charge credit shall be an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 18-26 Rean Drive to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following:
a. A $ 225,000.00 cash payment to be used towards the cost of constructing and equipping a public community centre as identified in Figure 4.3.3 of the Sheppard East Subway Corridor Secondary Plan, to be paid prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit for the development, with such amount to be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment;
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
b. The exemption of indoor private recreational amenity area from the calculation of gross floor area to a maximum of 331m²;
c. The Owner shall construct and maintain the development in accordance with Tier 1 performance measures of the Toronto Green Standard, as adopted by Toronto City Council at its meeting held on October 26 and 27, 2009;
d. The Owner shall design, construct and fund a passenger lay-by within the public boulevard on the south side of the unassumed road to the satisfaction of the Director, Transportation Services, North York District; and
e. The Owner shall convey to the City, at nominal cost, a widening of approximately 0.72 metres along the frontage of the unassumed road to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services and the City Solicitor.
6. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to enter into a Site Plan Agreement under Section 41(16) of the Planning Act and Section 114 of the City of Toronto Act, such agreement shall require provisions to secure the design, construction, funding and timing of the passenger lay-by to be provided by the applicant in the public boulevard located opposite the site in front of the Claridges site.
7. City Council require the applicant to provide 1% of the gross construction costs for public art.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41688.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42494.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(October 19, 2011) Letter from D. Waller (NY.Main.NY11.23.2)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27058.pdf
NY11.24 - Final Report - Lawrence-Allen Secondary Plan
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan substantially in accordance with the proposed Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District, with the following amendments:
a. That Policy 3.1.7 be amended by deleting the words:
"to minimize the number of curb cuts and protect opportunities for soft landscaping and active uses at grade along street edges. The implementing Zoning By-law(s) will prohibit direct vehicular access to townhouses from Primary Streets and from Local Streets where the townhouse is across from planned parkland. Where the implementing Zoning By-law does not prohibit vehicular access from Local Streets, it will establish standards for minimum lot width."
and inserting the following after the word driveways:
" to result in improved relationships between private buildings and the public realm and improved landscaping on public streets by minimizing the number of curb cuts, protecting opportunities for soft landscaping and providing active uses at grade along street edges." ; so that the revised Policy will read:
"3.1.7 Vehicular access to townhouses from the street will be discouraged in favour of rear access from public lanes or shared common driveways to result in improved relationships between private buildings and the public realm and improved landscaping on public streets by minimizing the number of curb cuts, protecting opportunities for soft landscaping and providing active uses at grade along street edges."
b. That Policy 4.6.6 be amended by adding to the end of Policy 4.6.6 so that the revised Policy will read:
"4.6.6 There will be no new connections for motor vehicles at Rondale Boulevard, Ridgevale Drive, and Kirkland Boulevard, which shall each remain as green space not open to traffic and be designed in such a way so as to preserve these connections as shared public spaces."
c. That Maps 32-9 Pedestrian Plan and 32-10 Bicycle Plan be amended by adding the words, "(subject to Policy 4.6.6)" to the Neighbourhoods Connection identified in the legend of each map, so that the legend will read:
"Neighbourhood Connection (subject to Policy 4.6.6)".
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment as may be required.
3. City Council adopt the Lawrence-Allen Urban Design Guidelines with the following amendment:
"That City Planning staff incorporate into the Lawrence-Allen Urban Design Guidelines appropriate renderings of the computer model of the Lawrence-Allen Revitalization Plan to reflect the lower unit count and revised built form provided for by the Secondary Plan."
4. City Council adopt the Lawrence-Allen Community Services and Facilities Strategy.
5. City Council adopt the Lawrence-Allen Transportation Master Plan which satisfies Phases 1 and 2 of the Municipal Class Environmental Assessment process.
6. City Council endorse the Lawrence-Allen Infrastructure Master Plan as a technical resource for City staff to support the implementation of the Secondary Plan.
7. City Council adopt the financial strategy for the Lawrence-Allen Secondary Plan as described in the report, (November 22, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer [NY11.24a], the salient features of which include:
i. development can only proceed once infrastructure required to accommodate it has been identified and funding for such infrastructure has been secured;
ii. as part of the annual capital budget setting process, affected City Divisions shall give consideration to infrastructure and community facilities required to implement various phases of the Secondary Plan within their Capital Plans, having regard to their overall priorities and prescribed debt target limits;
iii. the City's Development Charges By-law shall incorporate, to the extent permitted by the Development Charges Act, the growth-related components of infrastructure identified by the Secondary Plan;
iv. the costs of "local" infrastructure, as defined by the City from time to time, which is not eligible for development charges funding, shall be borne by the development proponent unless the City agrees that it shall assume such costs;
v. funding from other orders of government for this initiative shall be used, to the extent possible, for the purposes of supporting City infrastructure and community facilities costs; and
vi. where funding from other orders of government for this initiative cannot specifically be used for supporting infrastructure and community facilities, TCHC shall use its best efforts to absorb infrastructure funding commensurate with the level of support from the other orders of government.
8. City Council request the Deputy City Manager, Cluster A, continue to engage the Federal and Provincial governments in advising them of the opportunity to participate in the revitalization of Lawrence Heights through strategic funding investments in infrastructure, community facilities, and housing.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41802.pdf
Attachment 5 - Draft Official Plan Amendment
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41803.pdf
Attachment 6 - Lawrence-Allen Urban Design Guidelines
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41804.pdf
Attachment 7 - Lawrence-Allen Infrastructure Master Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41805.pdf
Attachment 8 - Lawrence-Allen Transportation Master Plan
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41806.pdf
Attachment 9 - Lawrence-Allen Community Services and Facilities Strategy
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-41807.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42514.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(December 2, 2010) Letter from C. A. Braithwaite (NY.Main.NY11.24.2)
(August 29, 2011) Letter from Chris Monahan, Director, Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, Research and Planning Branch, on behalf of the Minister, Training, Colleges and Universities (NY.Main.NY11.24.3)
(October 13, 2011) E-mail from Steve Mitchell (NY.Main.NY11.24.4)
(October 20, 2011) Letter from Mitch Stambler, Chief Planning Officer, Toronto Transit Commission (NY.New.NY11.24.5)
(November 2, 2011) Fax from Dr. Chris Spence, Director of Education, Toronto District School Board (NY.New.NY11.24.6)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Lise Olds (NY.New.NY11.24.7)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Howard Cohen (NY.New.NY11.24.8)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Nancy Singer, Executive Director, Kehilla Residential Programme (NY.New.NY11.24.9)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Julie Callaghan, Unison Health & Community Services, submitted by Larisa Kleiman (NY.New.NY11.24.10)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from J. Nobrega, on behalf of area residents and including Tony & Ida Evangelista, Anna DiMatteo, Frank Mangone and Ismael & Maria Galego (NY.New.NY11.24.11)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Sarah Flogen (NY.New.NY11.24.12)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Ronald King (NY.New.NY11.24.13)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Sharon Simpson, Special Projects Coordiinator, Labour Community Services (NY.New.NY11.24.14)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Laurel Rothman, Director, Social Reform, Family Service Toronto (NY.New.NY11.24.15)
(November 1, 2011) Fax from Grace Pluchino, Community Legal Worker, Downsview Community Legal Services (NY.New.NY11.24.16)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Norm Abrams (NY.New.NY11.24.17)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Anette Chawla, Executive Director, North York Harvest Food Bank (NY.New.NY11.24.18)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from David Nitkin, Bathurst-Lawrence Four Quadrants Neighbourhood Alliance (NY.New.NY11.24.19)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Rabbi Moshe Stern, Shaarei Tefillah Congregation (NY.New.NY11.24.20)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Eric Spiegel (NY.New.NY11.24.21)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Celia Bartfeld (NY.New.NY11.24.22)
(October 31, 2011) Petition from Marie Rosaria McCutcheon on behalf of Save Our Streets, containing approximately 2026 names of persons in opposition to the proposed Lawrence-Allen Revitalization Plan (NY.New.NY11.24.23)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Alexandra Lamoureux (NY.New.NY11.24.24)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Gillian Kranias (NY.New.NY11.24.25)
(November 2, 2011) Submission from Ronit Little, on behalf of the Board of Directors of the United Jewish People's Order, Toronto Section (NY.New.NY11.24.26)
(November 2, 2011) Submission from Quinto Annibale, Solicitor, Loopstra Nixon LLP, on behalf of Villa Charities Inc. (NY.New.NY11.24.27)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-26927.pdf
(November 28, 2011) E-mail from Laurie Payne, RPP, MCIP, Senior Development Manager, Toronto Community Housing Corporation forwarding a submission (November 2, 2011) from Len Koroneos, Chief Executive Officer (Interim) Toronto Community Housing Corporation (CC.New.NY11.24.29)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27059.pdf
(November 29, 2011) Petition from Councillor Josh Colle, Ward 15 - Eglinton-Lawrence, containing names of approximately 600 persons, respecting Item NY11.24 Lawrence Allen Secondary Plan (CC.New.NY11.24.30)
Declared Interests (City Council)
Councillor David Shiner - as a member of his family lives in very close proximity to the site.
NY11.26 - Request for Approval of Residential Demolition Permit - 78 Hillcrest Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the application to demolish the existing residential unit at 78 Hillcrest Avenue pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 363 under Section 33 of the Planning Act conditional upon:
i. the Zoning By-law Amendment for the lands municipally known as 31-45 Horsham Avenue, 20-26, 34 and 35 Churchill Avenue (together the "Horsham/Churchill Lands") authorized by the City Council Decision of September 21 and 22, 2011 (NY9.45), coming into full force and effect;
ii. the issuance of site plan approval by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning, for the Horsham/Churchill Lands pursuant to the related Zoning By-law Amendment referred to in Part i. above;
iii. that a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article III, if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
iv. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
v. that sod be laid on the site and be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5, and 629-10, paragraph B; and
vi. that any holes on the property be backfilled with clean fill.
2. City Council authorize the Chief Building Official to issue a demolition permit pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 363 under Section 33 of the Planning Act for 78 Hillcrest Avenue once conditions i. and ii. in Part 1, above, have been met.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-42133.pdf
NY11.27 - Application to Permit a Restaurant Usage - 2885 Bayview Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to retain, if necessary, an outside planning consultant to give evidence at the Ontario Municipal Board on behalf of the City, in support of the decision of the Committee of Adjustment, North York Panel, refusing the application adding a restaurant use permission at 2885 Bayview Avenue, which was refused by the members of the Committee of Adjustment and appealed by the applicant to the Ontario Municipal Board for their consideration.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-42138.pdf
(October 5, 2011) Notice of Decision - Minor Variance Application for 2885 Bayview Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-42140.pdf
Scarborough Community Council - Meeting 11
SC11.5 - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 385 Silver Star Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal address set out below be designated as a fire route pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880 - Fire Routes – 385 Silver Star Boulevard.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41171.pdf
Attachment - Amendment of Chapter 880 Fire Routes
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41172.pdf
SC11.6 - Assumption of Services - 651 Warden Avenue, Goldman Centennial Developments Limited, Registered Plan of Subdivision 66M-2455
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 44 - Scarborough East
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council assume the services installed for Registered Plan 66M-2455 and that the City formally assume the roads within the Plan of Subdivision.
2. City Council authorize the Legal Services Division to release the portion of the performance guarantee held with respect to this development Plan 66M-2455 with the exception of a total cash deposit of $300,000.00 as set out in the report (October 14, 2011) from the City Solicitor.
3. City Council direct that an assumption By-law be prepared to assume the public highway and municipal services in Subdivision Plan 66M-2455.
4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the assumption By-law in the Land Registry Office, at the expense of the Owner.
5. City Council authorize the City Clerk and Treasurer to sign any release or other documentation necessary to give effect thereto.
6. City Council authorize the appropriate City officials to transfer ownership of the street lighting system constructed within Plan of Subdivision No. 66M-2455 to Toronto Hydro.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41775.pdf
Location Map - Assumption of Services - 651 Warden Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41776.pdf
SC11.8 - Traffic Control Signals Study - Birchmount Road and Foxridge Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the installation of Traffic Control Signals at Birchmount Road and Foxridge Drive.
2. City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41696.pdf
Location Map: Traffic Control Signals Study - Birchmount Road and Foxridge Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41697.pdf
SC11.9 - Speed Zone Study - Midland Avenue from Eglinton Avenue East to St. Clair Avenue East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council rescind a maximum rate of speed – 60 km/h regulation on Midland Avenue from Eglinton Avenue East to St. Clair Avenue East, as identified in Appendix 1 of the report (October 6, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.
2. City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41693.pdf
Location Map: Speed Zone Study - Midland Avenue from Eglinton Avenue East to St. Clair Avenue East
SC11.12 - Speed Zone Study - McCowan Road from Eglinton Avenue East to Horfield Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest, 36 - Scarborough Southwest
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve a maximum rate of speed – 50 km/h regulation on McCowan Road from Eglinton Avenue East to Horfield Avenue.
2. City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41657.pdf
Location Plan - McCowan Road from Eglinton Avenue East to Horfield Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41658.pdf
SC11.15 - Northbound U-Turn Study - McCowan Road at Triton Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 38 - Scarborough Centre
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council rescind the prohibited turn regulations on McCowan Road at Triton Road, as identified in the Appendix 1 of the report (October 6, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.
2. City Council enact the prohibited turn regulations on McCowan Road at Triton Road, as identified in the Appendix 2 of the report (October 6, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District.
3. City Council pass or amend the appropriate by-law(s) accordingly.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41730.pdf
Location Map: Northbound U-Turn Study - McCowan Road and Triton Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41731.pdf
SC11.26 - 4121 Lawrence Avenue East - Rezoning Application - Preliminary Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 43 - Scarborough East
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council refuse the Rezoning Application for the lands at 4121 Lawrence Avenue East in its current form.
2. Should City Council’s decision to refuse the Rezoning Application be appealed, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, appropriate City staff, and, if needed, outside consultants, to attend the OMB hearing to support the City’s position.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41585.pdf
SC11.27 - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement - 80 Bell Estate Road (Thornbeck-Bell House)
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the proposed alterations to the heritage building at 80 Bell Estate Road substantially in accordance with the Heritage Impact Statement prepared by the Ventin Group (Toronto) Limited Architects and dated February 7, 2011 and revised August 17, 2011; drawings prepared by Peter A. Gabor, Architect dated July 19, 2010 and revised August 3, 2011; Landscape Plan prepared by Mep Design Inc., dated June 4, 2010 and revised August 4, 2011, and on file with the Manager of Heritage Preservation Services subject to the following conditions:
a. prior to the passing of Bills by Council the owner shall amend the Heritage Easement Agreement registered on title for the subject property to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services to allow for the proposed modifications;
b. prior to final Site Plan approval the owner shall provide the following to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services:
i. a detailed Conservation Plan, for the conservation work described in the HIA prepared by a qualified heritage consultant, detailing recommended interventions and conservation work including but not restricted to: conservation of the original exterior fabric of the Bell Estate; the restoration of the windows, doors, and shutters; a comprehensive assessment of the proposed approach for the oven and fireplace to ensure their long term preservation and to ensure that the process of encasing them into the wall will be reversible; a schedule of short and long term maintenance requirements; and estimated costs for all conservation work; and
ii. a final landscape plan that enhances the heritage character of the Bell Estate to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
c. prior to the issuance of any heritage permit for the proposal, including a heritage permit related to demolition, shoring, excavation and rebuilding of any building or structure on the subject property the owner shall provide the following:
i. a Letter of Credit, in a form and an amount satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, to secure all work included in the detailed Conservation Plan; and
ii. building permit drawings, including specifications for heritage conservation work prepared by the Heritage Consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
d. prior to the release of the Letter of Credit, the owner shall:
i. complete the heritage conservation work to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services;
ii. provide a Letter of Substantial Completion for the heritage conservation work signed by the project architect and Heritage Consultant to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
iii. submit final as-built replacement Heritage Easement Agreement photographs of the heritage building at 80 Bell Estate Road to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services; and
e. the applicant revise the approved drawings to delete the proposed rear addition on the north elevation of the Bell Estate, the heritage designated property located at 80 Bell Estate Road.
2. Prior to the introduction of the Bill in Council for the zoning amendment, the owner shall enter into an agreement with the City to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for 80 Bell Estate Road, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor, with the amended agreement to be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor to reflect the changes as described in the report (October 4, 2011) from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning.
3. City Council receive the letter (October 20, 2011) from the Toronto Preservation Board for information.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41571.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(October 30, 2011) E-mail from Rick Schofield, Chairman, Scarborough Community Preservation Committee (SC.New.SC11.27.2)
27a - Alterations to Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement, 80 Bell Estate Road (Thornbeck-Bell House)
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42019.pdf
SC11.28 - 80 Bell Estate Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Final Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the Oakridge Employment District Zoning By-law No. 24982, for the lands at 80 Bell Estate Road substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendment attached as Attachment No. 5 to the report dated October 14, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement and make the following payment, pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division, and the City Solicitor, such agreement to be registered on title to the lands to secure the following facilities, services and matters:
a. The owner is to provide a financial contribution to the City of $50,000 to be used for improvements to Maywood Park and/or local park improvements paid prior to the issuance of the first building permit; and
b. The payment set out in (a) above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of payment of the funds by the owner to the City.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to enter into an agreement with the City to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for 80 Bell Estate Road, to the satisfaction of the Manager, Heritage Preservation Services and the City Solicitor, with the amended agreement to be registered on title to the lands in a manner satisfactory to the City Solicitor to reflect the changes as described in the Heritage Preservation Services report (October 4, 2011) from the Director of Policy and Research.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41610.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
SC11.29 - 1051 Ellesmere Road - Zoning Amendment and Subdivision Applications - Final Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 37 - Scarborough Centre
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the Scarborough Employment Districts Zoning By-law No. 24982 (Dorset Park Employment District), as amended, for the lands at 1051 Ellesmere Road substantially in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendment attached as Attachment No. 6 to the report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, require the owner to enter into an agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. the community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 agreement are as follows:
i. $200,000 for improvements to the West Birkdale Park prior to the issuance of any building permits.
ii. $200,000 for improvements within the Birkdale Ravine and/or to local park improvements prior to the issuance of any building permits.
iii. Each instalment payment set out in Parts i and ii above shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Statistics Canada Non-Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 agreement to the date of payment of the funds by the owner to the City.
4. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law No. 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of subdivision as generally illustrated on Attachment No. 2 to report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment No. 7 to report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District, which except as otherwise noted must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of subdivision for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed subdivision plan or any such additional modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
5. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner to have on-site noise source measurements taken by a certified noise consultant for the loading docks, rooftop mechanical equipment, and all other stationary and transportation noise sources generated by 490 Midwest Road; and to have an addendum to the Environmental Noise Feasibility Study addressing these measurements and any further mitigation measures required to be submitted to the Chief Planner and Executive Director. Further identified mitigation measures, if any, shall be provided by the owner and secured through the subdivision agreement to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director.
6. As part of the approval, City Council require the owner to agree to include a “warning clause” in agreements of purchase and sale of the properties, alerting buyers that they may be subject to noise coming from the southern industrial lands.
7. City Council request both the owner and the complainant to review noise abatement solutions and forward to the Chief Planner and Executive Director for final direction on implementation.
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-41824.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Caterina Facciolo, Bratty and Partners, LLP (SC.New.SC.11.29.2)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-27060.pdf
(November 28, 2011) E-mail from Elliott Warsh (CC.New.SC11.29.4)
Toronto and East York Community Council - Meeting 11
TE11.1 - Permanent Closure of a Remnant Portion of Public Highway East of Bathurst Street and North of Housey Street in the Railway Lands
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council, permanently close the remnant portion of public highway east of Bathurst Street and north of Housey Street, designated as Part 49 on registered reference plan No. 66R 14891 and shown as Part 1 on Sketch No. PS 2009 072 (the "Highway"), attached to the report (October 7, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (October 7, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41673.pdf
Appendix A - Draft By-law - Permanent Closure of a Remnant Portion of Public Highway East of Bathurst Street and North of Housey Street in the Railway Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41674.pdf
Sketch No. PS-2009-072 - Permanent Closure of a Remnant Portion of Public Highway East of Bathurst Street and North of Housey Street in the Railway Lands
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41675.pdf
TE11.2 - Permanent Closure of a Portion of the Public Highway River Street and a Portion of the Un-Named Link Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council enact the draft by-law from the City Solicitor to permanently close a portion of the public highway River Street and a portion of the un-named Link Road, as follows:
a. A portion of the public highway River Street and a portion of the un-named Link Road, described as follows, are hereby permanently closed as public highways:
PIN 21078-0193 (LT)
Block 11, Plan 66M2473, City of Toronto
b. Section 1 of this By-law does not come into effect until the lands designated as follows have been acquired by the City of Toronto and dedicated by by-law for public highway purposes:
Parts 1 to 12 on Plan 66R- [NTD. Plan number to be inserted prior to enactment of this by-law following the deposit in the Registry Office of the Plan of Survey prepared by Holding Jones Vanderveen Inc., Job Number 05-1670-REF22, attached hereto as Appendix "A"]
Statutory - City of Toronto Act, 2006
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41670.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
TE11.3 - Final Report - 830 Lansdowne Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning Amendment Applications
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 18 - Davenport
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the Official Plan for the lands at 830 Lansdowne Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Official Plan Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (October 12, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86 substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment included as Attachment No.10 to the report (October 12, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Official Plan Amendment and draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 830 Lansdowne Avenue to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be provided and secured in the Section 37 Agreement are as follows:
i. The retention and renovation of the existing industrial building at 830 Lansdowne Avenue in accordance with the site plan drawings to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
ii. An indexed cash contribution, payable prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit, of $1,100,000 to be applied to any or all of the following:
- the construction of a new Toronto Public Library branch building in the local area;
- an expansion and/or necessary repairs to the Perth/Dupont neighbourhood library at 1589 Dupont Street; and
- improvements to Carlton Park.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a matter of legal convenience to support the development:
i. The applicant is required to pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure (including off-site road improvements) in connection with the Functional Servicing Report and the Traffic Impact Study and required supporting information, to be submitted for review and acceptance by the Executive Director of Technical Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure is required to support this development.
ii. The applicant be required to pay for transit signal priority at the Dupont/Lansdowne and Davenport/Lansdowne signalized intersections at a total cost of $70,000 as requested by the TTC. Additionally, in the event that the proposed signal at the site access driveway on Lansdowne Avenue is deemed to be acceptable, the applicant shall provide $35,000 to pay for transit signal priority at that location.
iii. The applicant be required to undertake wind tunnel testing as recommended in the Pedestrian Level Wind Preliminary Assessment prepared by Theakson Environmental and implement the recommended mitigation measures as identified as a result of this analysis, to be secured through Site Plan Approval.
5. Before introducing the necessary bills to Council, City Council require the applicant to address all outstanding requirements as outlined in the Technical Services memorandum dated September 22, 2011 and as further detailed in the letter to Roland Roover, Sernas Transtech, dated September 22, 2011, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services.
6. City Council require that the following issues be addressed through the site plan process:
i. Site plan issues raised in the Technical Services memorandum of September 22, 2011 will be addressed through the site plan review to the satisfaction of the Executive Director of Technical Services Division and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
ii. Detailed cross-sections and elevation drawings of the required crash walls adjacent the railway corridors at the north and west boundary of the site will be provided to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
iii. The layout of the central traffic courtyard will be revised to provide for appropriate and safe vehicle movements and pedestrian connections and maximize opportunities for landscaping.
iv. The quality of building materials and cladding, including the above-grade parking garage are to be to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
v. All landscaping, including trees, to be provided to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Park, Forestry and Recreation and the Executive Director, City Planning.
vi. Security issues will be review based upon CEPTED (Crime Prevention through Environmental Design) principles.
vii. The authors of the Noise Control Study prepared by MMM Group and dated August 2010 will be required to provide written confirmation that the recommendations of the study have been incorporated into the site plan drawings.
viii. A comprehensive lighting plan will be required for security and amenity purposes.
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41796.pdf
TE11.4 - Final Report - 250 Manning Avenue - Common Elements Condominium and Part Lot Control Exemption Applications
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 19 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. In accordance with the delegated approval under By-law 229-2000, as amended, City Council be advised that the Chief Planner intends to approve the draft plan of common elements condominium for the lands at 250 Manning Avenue, as generally illustrated on Attachment 1 to the report (September 26, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to:
a. the conditions as generally listed in Attachment 2 to the report (September 26, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District which, except as otherwise noted, must be fulfilled prior to the release of the plan of condominium for registration; and
b. any such revisions to the proposed condominium plan or any such additional or modified conditions as the Chief Planner may deem to be appropriate to address matters arising from the on-going technical review of this development.
2. City Council enact a Part Lot Control Exemption By-law with respect to the subject lands at 250 Manning Avenue, as generally illustrated on Attachment 3 to the report (September 26, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor and to expire two years following enactment by City Council.
3. City Council require the owner to provide proof of payment of all current property taxes for the subject lands to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, prior to the enactment of the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law.
4. Prior to the introduction of the Part Lot Control Exemption Bill, City Council require the owner to register, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, a Section 118 Restriction under the Land Titles Act agreeing not to transfer or charge any part of the lands without the written consent of the Chief Planner or his designate.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to take the necessary steps to release the Section 118 Restriction from title at such time as confirmation is received that the Common Elements Condominium has been registered.
6. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to register the Part Lot Control Exemption By-law on title.
7. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Part Lot Control Exemption By-law as may be required.
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41517.pdf
TE11.5 - Final Report - 783 Bathurst Street - Zoning Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438- 86 for the lands at 783 Bathurst Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (October 6, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to adding the following provisions:
a. A minimum of 44 resident parking spaces be provided on the lot.
b. Notwithstanding Restrictive Exception 12(2)228 of By-law 438 86, a maximum of one restaurant having a non residential Gross Floor Area that does not exceed 200m² be permitted on the lot with no parking requirement for the restaurant use. A club, place of amusement and place of assembly shall not be permitted on the lot.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 783 Bathurst Street to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. Community benefits will be provided and secured in the Section 37 Agreement as follows:
i. An indexed payment of $500,000.00 of which 10% will be payable prior to the enactment of the Bills and the remainder will be payable prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit. The initial 10% will be for public housing improvements in Ward 20 and the remainder will be for community improvements in Ward 20 in the vicinity of the site, which may include parks and public realm improvements.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
i. The owner shall pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report, to be accepted by the Executive Director, Technical Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support this development.
ii. The owner shall provide a minimum of 10% of the total number of units as three-bedroom dwelling units, with bedroom being defined as a habitable room which meets the requirements of the Ontario Building Code.
4. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the applicant to submit a revised Functional Servicing and Stormwater Management Report for review and acceptance by the Director, Technical Services.
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41593.pdf
TE11.6 - Final Report - 555 Dupont Street - Zoning Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86 for the lands at 555 Dupont Street, substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No.5 to the report (September 30, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 555 Dupont Street to submit a Feasibility Servicing Report, a hydrant flow test, and a water demand analysis to the Executive Director of Technical Services for approval.
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41572.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(October 14, 2011) E-mail from Tamara Moscoe (TE.Main.TE11.6.2)
(October 17, 2011) E-mail from Katherine Thomas (TE.Main.TE11.6.3)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Pat Gerada and Jorge Filmus (TE.Supp.TE11.6.4)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Ning and Ramin Farnood (TE.Supp.TE11.6.5)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Michael Power (TE.Supp.TE11.6.6)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Jerome Albert (TE.Supp.TE11.6.7)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Katharina Moller and Roderick Fisher (TE.Supp.TE11.6.8)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Cynthia Kennedy (TE.Supp.TE11.6.9)
TE11.7 - Final Report - 30 Roehampton Avenue - Zoning Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 22 - St. Paul's
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 30 Roehampton Avenue substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report (October 7, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 30 Roehampton Avenue to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act as follows:
a. The community benefits recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement are:
i. A payment of $1,300,000.00 which will be payable prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit. Such payment shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non Residential Construction Price Index for Toronto for the period from the date of Council enactment of this by-law to the date of Payment.
Such payment will be deposited to the Planning Act Reserve Fund and may be used for the capital construction of, or capital improvements to one or more of the following: the Northern Secondary School Northern Lakes Landscape Design Project, the new park which is to be developed south of the TTC bus barns at Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue West, the establishment of a drop-in centre for neighbourhood youth, the purchase of a new location for Central Eglinton Community Centre, a crosswalk between St Monica's Elementary School and the North Toronto Collegiate sports field and/or other local area park or streetscape improvements.
The funds will be allocated amongst the listed community benefits as determined by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
b. The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support development:
i. The owner shall construct and pay for any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report as accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure is required to support this development.
ii. As a precondition to the issuance of site plan approval, the owner shall acquire strata title to a portion of the lands known municipally in 2011 as 2345 Yonge Street to merge such lands with the subject land in order to provide sufficient parking spaces to comply with the parking ratio which is set out in the draft Zoning By-law attached as Attachment No. 9 to the report dated October 7, 2011 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
iii. As a pre-condition to the issuance of site plan approval, the owner shall acquire an easement over the lands known municipally in 2011 as 2345 Yonge Street in order to provide access, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to the parking spaces of the owner that will be located in lands known municipally in 2011 as 2345 Yonge Street.
4. City Council request the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to consult with the Sherwood Park Residents' Association on the Site Plan application for 30 Roehampton Avenue.
5. City Council request the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, and the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, to consult with local residents, the owner of 30 Roehampton Avenue, and other relevant City staff, to address the issue of periodic congestion on the exit ramp within the parking levels of the existing buildings at 2345 Yonge Street and 7 15 Broadway Avenue, noting that potential solutions may include restricting access and egress to and from the garage levels beneath the proposed building only to the Roehampton Avenue driveway.
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41574.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(October 17, 2011) Letter from Mark Lash (TE.Main.TE11.7.2)
(October 20, 2011) Fax from Harriet Moses Altman, Secretary, Bayview Valley Ratepayers Association (TE.Supp.TE11.7.3)
(October 28, 2011) Fax from Mark Rubenstein (TE.Supp.TE11.7.4)
(October 30, 2011) Letter from Nick Sion, President, Upper Canada Court Tenant Association (TE.Supp.TE11.7.5)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Edith Howard (TE.Supp.TE11.7.6)
Communications (City Council)
TE11.8 - Final Report - 155-163 Dundas Street East and 200 Jarvis Street - Zoning Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86, for the lands at 155-163 Dundas Street East and 200 Jarvis Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 1 to the report (November 1, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to deleting sections 5.g. and h. in Attachment No. 1, and replacing them with the following:
"g. a minimum of 72 residential and commercial parking spaces be provided on the lot.
h. a minimum of 204 bicycle parking spaces be provided on the lot."
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
3. Before introducing the necessary Bills to City Council for enactment, City Council require the owner of the lands at 155-163 Dundas Street East and 200 Jarvis Street to enter into an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, to be registered on title, to the satisfaction of the City Solicitor, to secure the following:
i. The conveyance of fourteen units to Artscape ("the Provider") at $250 per square foot, plus the School Board and City Development Charges associated with those units.
ii. Agreements of Purchase and Sale with respect to the all fourteen units in Part 3.i. above, shall be entered into with the Provider and/or the City prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit for the development.
iii. A provision allowing the Agreements of Purchase and Sale of all fourteen units in Part 3.i. above to be assignable.
iv. $150,000 for a Heritage Conservation District Study for the area bounded by Carlton Street, Sherbourne Street, Queen Street East and Jarvis Street.
v. $300,000 for laneway improvements between Mutual and Jarvis south of the site or to other local right-of-way or parks improvements.
vi. $400,000 for improvements to Allan Gardens Park.
vii. $300,000 for capital improvements to 170 Jarvis Street (Good Neighbours’ Club).
viii. Require that the cash amounts identified in Parts 3.iv., 3.v., 3.vi. and 3.vii. above shall be payable prior to the issuance of the first above grade building permit and that it be indexed annually in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of execution of the Section 37 Agreement to the date of submission of the funds by the owner to the City.
The following matters are also recommended to be secured in the Section 37 Agreement as a legal convenience to support the development:
a. The owner shall pay for and construct any improvements to the municipal infrastructure in connection with the Functional Servicing Report, as reviewed and accepted by the Executive Director of Technical Services, should it be determined that improvements to such infrastructure are required to support the development.
b. A Revised Functional Servicing Report must be submitted to analyze the impact of the sanitary and storm flow from the proposed development on the municipal downstream system and determine mitigation measures to minimize any negative impact, if any.
c. The public infrastructure should not be affected by the proposed development and therefore any reference to an eventual removal and reinstatement of the existing catch-basin located within the public laneway near the intersection with Jarvis Street needs to be eliminated from the revised Functional Servicing Report.
d. Submit revised plans, reports and/or documentation with respect to Conditions B(1) to B(12), for the review and acceptance of the General Manager of Transportation Services and Executive Director of Technical Services.
4. City Council determine that no further notice be given with respect to the proposed by-law.
5. City Council authorize the City to be a party to the Agreements of Purchase and Sale contemplated to be entered into for the Provider's units as a contingent transferee, in order to ensure the benefit of the units to be conveyed is secured for the intended purpose as set out in the report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District headed "155 163 Dundas Street East and 200 Jarvis Street Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report", in the event either of the organizations is not able to complete the transactions, by either assigning its interest in the Agreements of Purchase and Sale or by selling the units in the open market at fair market value with the proceeds to go towards affordable housing in Ward 27.
6. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision, including the specific actions set out in "Council Authorities to Implement Matters Pursuant to the Section 37 Agreement" as Appendix 1 to the report (October 17, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District headed "155 163 Dundas Street East and 200 Jarvis Street Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report".
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41729.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(October 12, 2011) E-mail from Rae and Geoff Arnold (TE.Main.TE11.8.2)
(October 7, 2011) E-mail from Tim Devlin (TE.Main.TE11.8.3)
(October 21, 2011) E-mail from Pierre Maheux (TE.Supp.TE11.8.4)
(October 25, 2011) E-mail from Don Wirringer and Tom Picotte (TE.Supp.TE11.8.5)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Roy Cain (TE.Supp.TE11.8.6)
(October 29, 2011) E-mail from Michael MacLean and Margaret McKinnon (TE.Supp.TE11.8.7)
(November 1, 2011) Letter from Don Locke, President of M.T.C.C. 1369 (TE.Supp.TE11.8.8)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Greg Marley, Deacon, Spears, Fedson + Montizambert (TE.Supp.TE11.8.9)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Suzanne de Grandpre (TE.Supp.TE11.8.10)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-26921.pdf
8a - Supplementary Report - 155-163 Dundas Street East and 200 Jarvis Street Zoning Amendment Application
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-42145.pdf
TE11.9 - Final Report - 341-355 Yonge Street - Zoning Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law 438-86 for the lands at 341-355 Yonge Street substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment No. 8 to the report (October 12, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendment as may be required.
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41738.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Evan M. Weinberg, Planning and Development Manager, Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area, attaching two letters addressed to Ryerson University and the Toronto and East York Community Planner (TE.Supp.TE11.9.2)
TE11.11 - Request for Direction Report - 357-363 King Street West and 62 Peter Street - Zoning Amendment Application
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board, and to retain outside planning consultants if necessary, in support of the applicant's appeal respecting the zoning by-law amendment application for 357-363 King Street West and 62 Peter Street, (File Number: 10 192451 STE 20 OZ) substantially in accordance with the modified plans prepared by Quadrangle Architects Limited dated October 24, 2011 as filed with the Clerk and the City Planning Division through the applicant’s solicitors, McMillan LLP on October 26, 2011, provided that the matters set out in Parts 2.a., 2.b., 2.c., and 2.d. below are completed to the satisfaction of the City staff.
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the OMB that City’s Council’s position is that any approval of the rezoning application for the site at 357-363 King Street West and 62 Peter Street, must satisfy the following conditions:
a. The zoning by-law will include a maximum of 350 residential units, 184 square metres of retail gross floor area, a minimum number of bicycle parking of 350 spaces in compliance with the Tier 1 Green Standard, a total amount of vehicle parking of 93 spaces, a total indoor amenity space of 664 square metres and outdoor amenity space of 363 square metres.
b. Before issuance by the OMB of the Final Order approving the Zoning By-law, the owner of the lands at 357-363 King Street West and 62 Peter Street shall be required to enter into and register on title an Agreement pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act. Community benefits shall be provided and secured in the Section 37 Agreement, as follows:
i. At least Ten Percent (10%), of the total number of dwelling units, to be constructed in the building shall be capable of being designed as three bedroom units in compliance with the provisions of the Ontario Building Code, and these dwelling units are to be shown on any marketing plans as three bedroom units and to be marketed as potential three bedroom units. These units may be sold and/or constructed with fewer bedrooms with provisions in the condominium documentation to allow renovation to three bedroom units.
ii. A total payment of $1.5 million for community improvements in Ward 20 in the vicinity of the site, will be secured by the City, which will be payable prior to the issuance of the first above-grade building permit. The full amount shall be indexed upwardly in accordance with the Non-Residential Construction Price Index (CPI) for the Toronto CMA, reported quarterly by Statistics Canada in Construction Price Statistics Publication No. 62-007-XPB, or its successor, calculated from the date of the Section 37 Agreement.
The payment of $1,500,000 will consist of a $1,350,000 contribution towards John Street streetscape improvements, local parks, heritage conservation studies, and a $150,000.00 contribution being made to public housing improvements in Ward 20. Should the maximum cost of the John Street streetscape improvements be less than $1,350,000, the unexpended dollar amount will be allocated to parks, heritage studies and/or public housing improvements, in Ward 20.
c. Outstanding technical matters, including but not limited to: site servicing; parking and loading requirements and waste management, be to the satisfaction of City staff, including the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Executive Director of Technical Services.
d. The applicant be required to draft a site-specific Zoning By-law amendment to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.
3. City Council require the applicant to agree to defend and save the City harmless any matters arising out of the approval of this project.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement the foregoing.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-40818.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(October 7, 2011) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, Solicitors for River Oaks Investments Inc. (TE.Main.TE11.11.2)
(October 26, 2011) Letter from Mary Flynn-Guglietti, McMillan LLP, Solicitors for River Oaks Investments Inc. (TE.Supp.TE11.11.3)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/comm/communicationfile-26928.pdf
TE11.12 - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - King Street West Properties
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council state its intention to designate the following properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act:
a. 291 King Street West
b. 293 King Street West
c. 295 King Street West
d. 297 King Street West
e. 299 King Street West
f. 301(303) King Street West
g. 315 King Street West
h. 319 King Street West
i. 321 King Street West
j. 323 King Street West
k. 325 King Street West
l. 327 (333) King Street West.
2. If there are no objections to the designations in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the properties under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designations to the Conservation Review Board.
4. If the designations are referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the designations of the properties.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41427.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-25903.pdf
(September 29, 2011) Letter from May Luong, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (TE.Main.TE11.12.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-25904.pdf
(October 31, 2011) Letter from N. Jane Pepino, Aird & Berlis LLP (TE.Supp.TE11.12.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-26178.pdf
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from May Luong, Land Use Planner Borden Ladner Gervais LLP (TE.Supp.TE11.12.4)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/comm/communicationfile-26392.pdf
12a - Intention to Designate Under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act - King Street West Properties
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41428.pdf
TE11.13 - Repeal of Designating By-Law No. 1997-0219 - 102 Shuter Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council state its intention to repeal By-law No. 1997-0219 under Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act, being the designation of the property at 102 Shuter Street pursuant to the Ontario Heritage Act, which was the former location of Walnut Hall (now demolished).
2. If there are no objections to the proposed repeal of By law No. 1997 0219, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the necessary bill in Council repealing By law No. 1997 0219 pursuant to Part IV, Section 31 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are objections to the proposed repeal of By-law No. 1997 0219, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the proposed repealing of the by-law to the Conservation Review Board.
4. If the repeal of By-law No. 1997-0219 is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council's decision on the repeal of By-law No. 1997 2019.
5. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to delete By-law No. 1997 0219 from the title of the property at 102 Shuter Street.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41513.pdf
13a - Repeal of Designation By-law No. 1997-0219 - 102 Shuter Street
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41881.pdf
TE11.33 - Principles Report - Area Specific Official Plan Review - Area Bounded by Queen Street West, Dufferin Street, Peel Avenue, Northcote Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 18 - Davenport
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division to initiate an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for the area bounded by Queen Street West, Dufferin Street, Peel Avenue and Northcote Avenue, generally as described in the report (October 7, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41522.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
TE11.42 - Downtown Yonge Street Studies - Status Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request City Planning, Transportation Services, Economic Development and Culture, Technical Services, and Parks, Forestry and Recreation Divisions, in consultation with the TTC, to report back to Council in the first quarter of 2012 with recommendations to implement the Yonge Street Studies outlined in the report (October 24, 2011), titled Downtown Yonge Street Planning Studies - Status Report, from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, including analysis of cost and feasibility and opportunities for pilot projects and various streetscape improvements.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-42005.pdf
(October 19, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Downtown Yonge Street Studies - Status Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41848.pdf
TE11.43 - Preliminary Report - Downtown East Planning Study
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council expand the boundaries of the Downtown East Planning Study to include Carlton Street as the northern boundary and Queen Street East as the southern boundary, and Jarvis Street as the western boundary.
2. Upon adoption of Heritage Conservation Districts in Toronto: Procedures, Policies and Terms of Reference, City Council direct City Planning to report back to Council seeking authority to initiate a Heritage Conservation District (HCD) Study under section 40. (1) of the Ontario Heritage Act for the area described in this report and to be paid for through the provision of Section 37 funds.
3. City Council direct staff to report to Council upon completion of the HCD Study to report on conclusions and recommendations for next steps, including appropriate zoning, and Official Plan amendments required for the implementation of a revitalization strategy for the area of the study, as per Section 40 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. City Council direct City Planning and Social Development, Finance and Administration staff to bring forward by the fourth quarter of 2012 a Final Report and recommendations for the implementation of a revitalization strategy for the Study Area.
5. City Council direct City Planning staff to continue community consultation as part of the study process in co-ordination with the local councillor, including the formation of a George Street Working Group.
6. City Council direct that an interdivisional working group be formed comprised of all necessary City divisions and agencies in consultation with the local Councillor.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-42006.pdf
(October 19, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - Downtown East Planning Study - Preliminary Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41870.pdf
TE11.46 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 359-377 Roehampton Avenue, 292-314 Merton Street, 560 Front Street West, 336 Spadina Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880-Fire Routes:
- 359-377 Roehampton Avenue;
- 292-314 Merton Street;
- 560 Front Street West; and
- 336 Spadina Road.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41587.pdf
Draft By-law - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes -359-377 Roehampton Avenue, 292-314 Merton Street, 560 Front Street West, 336 Spadina Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41818.pdf
TE11.47 - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 550 Bayview Avenue, 15 Pape Avenue and 200 Dawes Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- 29 - Toronto-Danforth, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 31 - Beaches-East York
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council designate part or those parts of the private road or roads shown on the site plan filed with the Fire Chief in respect of the municipal addresses set out below be designated as fire routes pursuant to Municipal Code Chapter 880-Fire Routes:
- 550 Bayview Avenue;
- 15 Pape Avenue; and
- 200 Dawes Road.
2. City Council authorize the Fire Chief and City Solicitor to take the appropriate action to make a designated Fire Route.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41216.pdf
Draft By-law - Designation of Fire Routes and Amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes - 550 Bayview Avenue, 15 Pape Avenue and 200 Dawes Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41819.pdf
TE11.50 - Road Alterations - Coxwell Avenue and Fairford Avenue/Gerrard Street East
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Wards:
- 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, deferred consideration of Item TE11.50, together with the following motion by Councillor McMahon, to the next regular City Council meeting on February 6 and 7, 2012:
Moved by Councillor McMahon:
That City Council:
1. Direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to undertake the following operational measures when the Coxwell Avenue and Fairford Avenue/Gerrard Street East intersection has been altered:
a. implement a traffic control signal phasing plan to accommodate safe pedestrian crossings, minimize impacts to Toronto Transit Commission buses and ensure efficient movement of vehicles;
b. after a period of two (2) months or sooner, identify any pedestrian and vehicle problems and make required signal timing adjustments;
c. install appropriate signs and pavement markings to ensure that pedestrians, cyclists and vehicle operators have a clear understanding how to safely and efficiently enter and exit the intersection;
d. review existing parking regulations on Gerrard Street, Coxwell Avenue and adjacent local streets and prepare a report on any possible adjustments; and
e. meet with Toronto Transit Commission staff to ensure that transit needs are being addressed for the intersection including the location of Toronto Transit Commission stops.
2. City Council request the Toronto Police Service to expedite its review and traffic study related to Councillor McMahon's request for a School Crossing Guard for this intersection and expedite the staffing of this intersection through appropriate channels.
3. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, to carry out a study of alternatives for Gainsborough Road to calm traffic, minimize traffic infiltration and enhance pedestrian safety and report back to the Toronto and East York Community Council.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41827.pdf
Attachment 1 - Road Alterations - Coxwell Avenue and Fairford Avenue/Gerrard Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41828.pdf
Attachment 2 - Road Alterations - Coxwell Avenue and Fairford Avenue/Gerrard Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41829.pdf
Attachment 3 - Road Alterations - Coxwell Avenue and Fairford Avenue/Gerrard Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41830.pdf
Attachment 4 - Road Alterations - Coxwell Avenue and Fairford Avenue/Gerrard Street East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41831.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
(October 22, 2011) E-mail from Tawnya Hallman (TE.Supp.TE11.50.2)
(October 28, 2011) E-mail from Debbie Harris (TE.Supp.TE11.50.3)
(October 31, 2011) E-mail from Michael Ufford (TE.Supp.TE11.50.4)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Robert Allsopp (TE.Supp.TE11.50.5)
(November 2, 2011) E-mail from Icrus Murphy (TE.Supp.TE11.50.6)
(November 1, 2011) E-mail from Verena Besso and Joshua Weisz (TE.Supp.TE11.50.7)
(July 8, 2008) Submission from Bryce Miranda (TE.Supp.TE11.50.8)
Communications (City Council)
TE11.51 - Road Alteration - Woodbine Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 32 - Beaches-East York
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the alteration of Woodbine Avenue, between 17 metres north of Lake Shore Boulevard and a point 32.5 metres further north, by extending the median island, generally as shown in the attached Drawing No. 421G-0452, dated September 2011, attached to the report (September 29, 2011) from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council rescind the 'No Parking Anytime' regulation on the east side of Woodbine Avenue, between Lake Shore Boulevard East and a point 255 metres south of Queen Street East.
3. City Council implement a 'No Parking Anytime' regulation on the east side of Woodbine Avenue, between Lake Shore Boulevard East and a point 222.5 metres south of Queen Street East.
4. City Council prohibit southbound and westbound left turns to and from the driveway between Premises Nos. 79 and 83 Woodbine Avenue.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41575.pdf
Drawings - Road Alteration - Woodbine Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41576.pdf
TE11.54 - Construction Staging Area - Jarvis Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the closure of the sidewalk and bicycle lane on the west side of Jarvis Street, between Charles Street East and a point 43 metres south of Charles Street East, from November 3, 2011 to September 30, 2013.
2. City Council direct that Jarvis Street be returned to its pre-construction traffic and parking regulations when the project is complete.
3. City Council direct the applicant to post a 24-hour monitored construction hotline number on the hoarding board.
4. City Council direct the applicant to provide and install at their sole cost public art including mural art onto the hoarding boards in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41614.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0466 - Construction Staging Area - Jarvis Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41623.pdf
TE11.59 - Parking Amendments - Dupont Street
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council rescind the parking regulations outlined in Appendix "A" attached to the report (October 11, 2011), entitled "Parking Amendments - Dupont Street", from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District.
2. City Council approve implementation of the parking regulations outlined in Appendix "B" attached to the report (October 11, 2011), entitled "Parking Amendments - Dupont Street", from the Director, Transportation Services, Toronto and East York District, with Appendix B amended by deleting Parts 1 and 2, and inserting the following new Parts 1 and 2:
1. Adjust the "No Stopping from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday except public holidays" regulation on the south side of Dupont Street, from Lansdowne Avenue to Spadina Road, to apply from Lansdowne Avenue to St. George Street.
2. Adjust the "No Stopping, from 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m., Monday to Friday except public holidays" regulation on the north side of Dupont Street, from a point 36 metres east of Lansdowne Avenue to Spadina Road, to apply from a point 36 metres east of Lansdowne Avenue to St. George Street.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41617.pdf
Attachments - Parking Amendments - Dupont Street
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41621.pdf
TE11.65 - Proposed Traffic Island - Spadina Road at Thelma Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 22 - St. Paul's
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the narrowing of Spadina Road, from a width of 14.5 metres to a width of 12.5 metres by the installation of a modular traffic island, on the east side of Spadina Road, from a point 3.2 metres south of Thelma Avenue to a point 11.8 metres further south.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41431.pdf
Drawing No. 421G-0442 - Proposed Traffic Island - Spadina Road at Thelma Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41432.pdf
TE11.73 - Revised Request for Direction Report - 41 Ossington Avenue - Zoning Amendment
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 19 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to attend any Ontario Municipal Board Hearings and not to oppose the Official Plan Amendment and the revised zoning by-law amendment, provided they are in accordance with the revised setbacks/ stepbacks and terms of settlement for 41 Ossington Avenue described in the report (November 1, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, subject to an additional 1 metre setback/stepback on the easterly 5th and 6th floors of the 6-storey condominium building at 41 Ossington Avenue, along Rebecca Street, as shown on Attachments 2 and 3 to the report (November 28, 2011) from the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning Division.
2. City Council deem that the minor encroachment of the 6-storey mixed use building into the Neighbourhoods Designation complies with the intent of the Official Plan under policies 5.6.5 interpretation chapter 5.
3. City Council request the owner to participate in a community construction consulting liaison group to be overseen by the Ward Councillor, to develop a strategy to minimize any impact of construction of the proposed development on the adjacent neighbourhood.
4. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-42128.pdf
(October 20, 2011) Report from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District - 41 Ossington Avenue - Zoning Amendment - Revised Request for Direction Report - Notice of Pending Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41865.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42571.pdf
Communications (Community Council)
TE11.74 - Technical Amendment - 591 Dundas Street East - Regent Park Phase 2 Application to Remove the Holding Symbol (h) from the Zoning By-law and Application for Residential Demolition
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend Zoning By-law No. 438-86 of the former City of Toronto, as amended to remove the Holding Symbol (h) from certain lands in the Regent Park redevelopment (Phase 2 - 591 Dundas Street East) in accordance with the draft zoning by-law amendment attached to the report (October 25, 2011) from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District, as Attachment No. 4.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylist and technical changes to the draft zoning by-law amendment as may be required.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-41999.pdf
TE11.77 - Liquor Licence Application - 621 King Street West - Licence No. 10925
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for 621 King Street West (“Premises”) is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the AGCO to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the Licence Appeal Tribunal in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor, which address issues including, but not limited to, noise, safety, security personnel, security cameras, crowd control, signage, lighting and litter.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-42115.pdf
TE11.80 - Liquor Licence Application - 481 Bloor Street West - Ye Olde Brunswick House
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario that the liquor licence application for an increase in indoor capacity from 502 persons to 600 persons for Ye Olde Brunswick House, 481 Bloor Street West (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, given there have been numerous complaints about the Premises from residents in the area including public drunkenness, public urination, vandalism, theft, noise and trespassing, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Refuse the liquor licence application.
2. City Council request the Licence Appeal Tribunal ("LAT") to provide the City with an opportunity to be made a party to any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the LAT in this matter and be authorized to take all necessary action so as to give effect to this motion, including adding conditions to any liquor licence, in consultation with the ward councillor, should a liquor licence be issued for the Premises.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-42130.pdf
TE11.82 - 431, 441 and 445 Richmond Street West
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct the Chief Planner, in consultation with the City Solicitor and Ward Councillor, to continue negotiations with the applicant for 431, 441 and 445 Richmond Street West with the goal of reaching a settlement that achieves an appropriate transition in building height to the prevailing built form and context in the West Precinct of the King-Spadina Secondary Plan Area, as outlined in the staff report (October 18, 2011).
2. the event that staff and the applicant are unable to reach a satisfactory settlement, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and/or an outside planning consultant and any other appropriate staff, to attend any Ontario Municipal Board Hearings in opposition to the disputed variances.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-42131.pdf
TE11.83 - Intention to Designate 295 George Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. In order to protect the house at 295 George Street from demolition, City Council include the property at 295 George Street on the City of Toronto Inventory of Heritage Properties.
2. City Council state its intention to designate the property at 295 George Street under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
3. If there are no objections in accordance with Section 29(6) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council authorize the City Solicitor to introduce the bills in Council designating the property under Part IV, Section 2 of the Ontario Heritage Act.
4. If there are objections in accordance with Section 29(7) of the Ontario Heritage Act, City Council direct the City Clerk to refer the designation to the Conservation Review Board.
5. If the designation is referred to the Conservation Review Board, City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend any hearing held by the Conservation Review Board in support of Council’s decision on the designation of the property.
Origin
Background Information (Community Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/te/bgrd/backgroundfile-42143.pdf
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42572.pdf
(November 24, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Policy and Research, City Planning on the intention to designate 295 George Street under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42573.pdf
City Council - New Business - Meeting 14
CC14.1 - Personal Vehicle Tax - Closing Administrative Matters
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council directed that collection of the Personal Vehicle Tax (PVT) cease in its entirety effective January 1, 2012, and the PVT By law (City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 765, Taxation, Personal Vehicle Tax) be amended to end all PVT liability and collection accordingly.
2. City Council grant authority for the introduction of the necessary bills to give effect to Council’s decision.
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42408.pdf
Communications (City Council)
CC14.2 - External Compliance Auditor's Reports for the Integrity Commissioner, Lobbyist Registrar and Ombudsman
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, received the external compliance auditor’s reports for the year ended December 31, 2010 for the offices of the Integrity Commissioner, the Lobbyist Registrar and the Ombudsman for information.
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42409.pdf
(November 2, 2011) Memo from the City Manager forwarding External Auditor's Reports for the Integrity Commissioner, the Lobbyist Registrar and the Ombudsman
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42441.pdf
(October 7, 2011) External Auditor's Report on the Integrity Commissioner's Office for the year ended December 31, 2010
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42442.pdf
(October 7, 2011) External Auditor's Report on the Lobbyist Registrar's Office for the year ended December 31, 2010
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42443.pdf
(October 7, 2011) External Auditor's Report on the Ombudsman's Office for the year ended December 31, 2010
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42444.pdf
CC14.3 - Advance Vote By-law for the 2012 By-election to Fill the Vacancies on the Toronto District School Board
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 17 - Davenport, 20 - Trinity-Spadina
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council establish the following dates and hours for advance voting for the 2012 Toronto District School Board by-election to fill the vacancies in the offices of trustee Ward 17 - Don Valley East (City Wards 33 and 34) and Ward 20 - Scarborough-Agincourt (City Wards 39 and 40):
a. Saturday, February 18, 2012, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.; and
b. Sunday, February 19, 2012, from 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
2. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City Officials to take the necessary action to give effect to Council's decision, including the introduction of the bill attached as Appendix "A" to the report (November 18, 2011) from the City Clerk.
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42467.pdf
CC14.4 - 2 Spencer Ave - Zoning Amendment Application - Request for Direction Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Ward:
- 14 - Parkdale-High Park
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to attend at the Ontario Municipal Board on January18, 2012, in support of the Zoning Amendment application, provided the proposed Terms of Settlement contained in the planning review are agreed to by the applicant.
2. in the event that staff and the applicant are unable to reach a satisfactory settlement, City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to oppose the applicant’s appeal of the Zoning By-law Amendment application at the Ontario Municipal Board.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement Council's decision.
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42493.pdf
CC14.5 - To Extend the Agreement for Insurance Claims Adjusting Services with Granite Claims Solutions for a Three Month Term Ending March 31, 2012
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize an extension for a further three months, from December 31, 2011 to March 31, 2012, of the existing agreement with Granite Claims Solutions to provide insurance claims adjusting services.
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42495.pdf
CC14.6 - Consent to Transfer of Controlling Interest in the Ownership of Turtle Island Recycling Corporation
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- 1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke North, 3 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council consent to the change of control of Turtle Island Recycling Corporation as a result of the purchase of all of its shares by GFL Environmental Corporation (GFL) and any future amalgamation or merger with GFL or an affiliate of GFL on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services that ensure the continued proper performance of the City's collection agreement, including the security obligations under the agreement, and otherwise in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
2. City Council authorize the Acting General Manager, Solid Waste Management Services, to sign the consent documentation and take any other actions and execute any other documents as may be required to give effect to Council's decision.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on December 1, 2011, and considered confidential information on this Item as it relates to the security of the property of the municipality and litigation or potential litigation that affects the City.
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42515.pdf
(November 21, 2011) Independent Review by Ernst & Young
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42534.pdf
CC14.7 - A False Impression of Fairness: An Investigation of One Person's Appeal of the Loss of Subsidized Daycare
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, deferred consideration of Item CC14.7 to the next regular City Council meeting on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor to consider the items remaining on the agenda.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council on December 1, 2011 adopted a motion to defer any remaining Items on the agenda to the next regular meeting of City Council on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor for that purpose.
The following Items were subsequently deferred:
Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG9.11
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.5
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.10
New Business Item CC14.7, and
Member Motion MM14.28
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42516.pdf
Investigation Report from the Ombudsman, headed "A False Impression of Fairness" - An Investigation of One Person's Appeal of the Loss of Subsidized Daycare
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42517.pdf
(November 30, 2011) Letter from the City Manager Re: Toronto Ombudsman Report - November 2011 - An Investigation into Children's Services' Appeal Process, Investigation Process and Record Keeping Practices (CC14.7a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42754.pdf
CC14.8 - Amendments to Terms of Sale by Toronto Port Lands Company/TEDCO of Corus Quay
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council adopt the proposed amendments, which are set out in Confidential Attachment to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, to the terms originally established by Council for its consent to Toronto Port Lands Company’s proposal to offer the Project (being the lands and premises municipally known as 25 Dockside Drive) for sale.
2. City Council consent to the extension of the maturity date for the construction loan provided for this project by the City from December 31, 2011 to June 30, 2012.
3. City Council request the City Manager to submit a report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on further funding options for transportation on the East Bay Front waterfront area.
4. City Council direct that Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer remain confidential under the provisions of the City of Toronto Act 2006, as they relate to the security of property of municipality or local board, until the closing of the sale transaction.
Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer remain confidential in their entirety, at this time, in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as the information relates to the security of property of municipality or local board. The Confidential Attachments will be made public following the closing of the sale transaction.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on November 29, 2011, and considered confidential information on this Item as it relates to the security of the property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions.
Confidential Attachment - The security of the property belonging to the City or one of its agencies, boards and commissions.
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42520.pdf
Confidential Attachments 1 and 2 - made public on November 26, 2012
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42521.pdf
CC14.9 - Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) - Employer Compliance Audit
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted on Consent
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council adopt the recommendations and instructions to staff contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the City Solicitor and the City Manager.
2. City Council authorize the payment of funds required to carry out the instructions, contained in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the City Solicitor and the City Manager, from the Employee Benefits Reserve Fund.
3. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions approved by City Council and the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the City Solicitor and the City Manager, as determined by the City Solicitor.
4. City Council authorize the release of the Financial Impact arising from this report at the conclusion of the objection and appeal process, as determined by the City Solicitor.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer, the City Solicitor and the City Manager, remains confidential in its entirety at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board, solicitor client privilege and labour relations or employment-related matters.
The confidential instructions approved by City Council and the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 will be made public as determined by the City Solicitor. The financial impact arising from this report will be released at the conclusion of the objection and appeal process, as determined by the City Solicitor.
Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation, including matters before administrative tribunals, affecting the municipality or local board, solicitor client privilege and labour relations or employment-related matters.
Origin
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-42518.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
City Council - Member Motions - Meeting 14
MM14.1 - Request for City Representation at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - B030/11NY, A419/11NY & A420/11NY - 98 Esgore Drive - by Councillor Karen Stintz, seconded by Councillor John Parker
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 16 - Eglinton-Lawrence
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff to appear at the Ontario Municipal Board Hearing to uphold the Committee of Adjustment's decision on 98 Esgore Drive.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42406.pdf
(October 19, 2011) Committee of Adjustment North York Panel - Notice of Decision (Minor Variance/Permission)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42407.pdf
MM14.2 - Usage of Councillor Staff Salary Budget to Pay for Constituency Office Lease Expenses - by Councillor Ron Moeser, seconded by Councillor Norman Kelly
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. Councillors can use up to $6,666.67 of their 2011 Staff Salary Budget to pay for constituency office lease expenses in 2011.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.3 - Request to Amend Mandate of the Employee and Labour Relations Committee - (EX12.22) Removal of Matter from Executive Committee - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Intro Failed
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, did not remove Executive Committee Item EX12.22 from the committee's jurisdiction.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.4 - City Way-finding Strategy - by Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the Manager, Public Realm Unit, to report to the March 21, 2012 meeting of the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on the City's Way-Finding Strategy and the role of info-pillars in the strategy.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.5 - Info Pillars on City Sidewalks - by Councillor Adam Vaughan, seconded by Councillor Janet Davis
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Referred
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, referred Motion MM14.5 to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42544.pdf
Photographs of Info Pillars
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42513.pdf
(November 30, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42787.pdf
Communications (City Council)
MM14.6 - Staff representation at an Ontario Municipal Board hearing for 374 and 378 Drewry Avenue - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Joe Mihevc
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and City Planning staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of the Committee of Adjustment's refusal of the proposed severance and related minor variances for 374 and 378 Drewry Avenue.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42496.pdf
(October 5, 2011) Committee of Adjustment North York Panel - Notice of Decisions (Consent, Minor Variance/Permission)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42542.pdf
MM14.7 - Consent to permit Beasley Amusements Inc. to hold over and operate in the 2012 season - by Councillor Pam McConnell, seconded by Councillor Norman Kelly
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 30 - Toronto-Danforth
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the General Manager of Parks, Forestry and Recreation to provide the City's Consent to allow William Beasley Enterprises Inc. to hold over and become a month-to-month tenant, generally on the same terms and conditions under the Lease Agreement dated May 15, 2002, together with such other terms and conditions as determined by the General Manager, to ensure that the premises are available for a new operator as at January 1, 2013, and in a form acceptable to the City Solicitor.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.8 - Investigating the Feasibility of Allowing Backyard Hens in Toronto - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Referred
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, referred Motion MM14.8 to the Licensing and Standards Committee.
Background Information (City Council)
Communications (City Council)
MM14.9 - Authority for City position at the Ontario Municipal Board - A0803-10TEY - 220 Rosemary Road - by Councillor Joe Mihevc, seconded by Councillor John Filion
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 21 - St. Paul's
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to agree to a settlement of the appeal, if a revised plan is submitted to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor, respecting a reduction in gross floor area and the construction of roof trusses in the third storey attic at 220 Rosemary Road.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42505.pdf
(November 22, 2011) Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel - Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42506.pdf
MM14.10 - Liquor Licence Application - 1320 Queen Street West, Restaurant Chantecler - AGCO File No: 815292 - by Councillor Gord Perks, seconded by Councillor Adam Vaughan
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 14 - Parkdale-High Park
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct the City Clerk to advise the Registrar of the Alcohol and Gaming Commission of Ontario (“AGCO”) that the liquor licence application for Restaurant Chantecler, 1320 Queen Street West (“Premises”), is not in the public interest having regard to the needs and wishes of the residents, and that the Registrar should issue a Proposal to Review the liquor licence application unless appropriate conditions relating to noise, litter, safety and security, drug use, and other disturbances to residents, are attached to the liquor licence.
2. City Council request the AGCO or the Licence Appeal Tribunal (LAT) to provide the City with an opportunity to participate in any proceedings with respect to the Premises.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend all proceedings before the AGCO or LAT in this matter and be directed to take all necessary actions so as to give effect to this Motion, including adding and deleting conditions to any liquor licence issued for the Premises, in consultation with the Ward Councillor.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.11 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing on 161 August Avenue - by Councillor Michelle Berardinetti, seconded by Councillor Gary Crawford
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council instruct the City Solicitor to seek an adjournment of the December 1, 2011 hearing before the Ontario Municipal Board regarding 161 August Avenue.
2. In the event that an adjournment of the hearing is granted, City Council further instruct the City Solicitor to retain an outside planning consultant and to oppose the severances sought at the hearing of the merits of this appeal.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42511.pdf
(August 23, 2011) Committee of Adjustment Scarborough Panel - Notice of Decision, Consent, 161 August Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42512.pdf
MM14.12 - Authorization to Release Section 37 Funds to Toronto District School Board for Construction of a Childcare Facility at Churchill Public School - by Councillor John Filion, seconded by Councillor Josh Matlow
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 23 - Willowdale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the transfer of $2,300,000 from the Planning Act Reserve Fund XR3026 370086, fully funded by Section 37 community benefits from the development at 5435 Yonge Street, to the Child Care Capital Reserve Fund XR1103 to provide funding for the construction by Toronto District School Board (TDSB) of a non-profit childcare facility at Churchill Public School, 188 Churchill Avenue.
2. City Council authorize the increase in the 2011 Operating Budget for Children's Services from $387,902,261 million gross, $74,272,655 million net by $2,300,000 gross $0 net to $390,202,261 million gross, $74,272,655 million net so that funds can be forwarded to TDSB in accordance with the terms of agreement between the City and TDSB for the construction of the child care facility at Churchill Public School.
3. City Council direct that, prior to any funds being forwarded to TDSB, the TDSB enter into an agreement with the City with respect to the specifications, construction and operation of the childcare facility, and the transfer of funds from the City to TDSB, with terms and conditions satisfactory to the General Manager of Children's Services and in a form satisfactory to the City Solicitor.
4. City Council authorize and direct the appropriate City officials to take all necessary action to give effect to these recommendations, and authorize the General Manager of Children's Services to execute the agreement with TDSB on behalf of the City.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42543.pdf
(November 30, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42788.pdf
MM14.13 - Proposed Permanent Closure of a Small Portion of the Bloor Street West Right-of-Way, Adjacent to Old Mill Drive - by Councillor Sarah Doucette, seconded by Councillor Peter Milczyn
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 13 - Parkdale-High Park
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council permanently close that part of the public highway known as Bloor Street West, legally described as Part 3 on Plan 66R-25740 (the "Highway") as shown on the Reference Plan attached as Attachment 1 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, once the Highway ownership has been technically corrected in the Land Registry Office, and enact a by-law substantially in the form of the draft by-law attached as Appendix "A" to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District, conditional on the City entering into an agreement with Residences at Old Mill Inc., the owner of 1 Old Mill Drive (the "Owner") wherein the Owner agrees to purchase the Highway on terms satisfactory to the City.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to complete the transaction on behalf of the City, including paying any necessary expenses, amending the closing, due diligence and other dates, and amending and waiving terms and conditions, on such terms as she considers reasonable.
3. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services that no further notice to the public pursuant to the Notice Requirements in respect of the proposed closure is required.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42525.pdf
(November 22, 2011) Report from the Acting Director, Transportation Services, Etobicoke York District regarding the proposed permanent closure of a portion of the Bloor Street West Right-of-Way
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42526.pdf
MM14.14 - Request to protect City of Toronto interests and existing powers in any trade agreement signed between the Government of Canada and the European Union - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Referred
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, referred Motion MM14.14 to the Executive Committee.
Background Information (City Council)
Communications (City Council)
(November 28, 2011) E-mail from Michelle Treacy (MM.New.MM14.14.2)
MM14.15 - 20 Coules Court - St. Ambrose Catholic School - Request for Complete Exemption from Green Roof Requirement - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council approve the request for a complete exemption from the Green Roof requirement of Chapter 492 of the Toronto Municipal Code for the lands at 20 Coules Court, subject to the making of the cash in lieu payment under Chapter 492.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42529.pdf
(November 30, 2011) Fiscal Impact Statement from the Deputy City Manager and Chief Financial Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42789.pdf
Communications (City Council)
MM14.16 - Request to implement use of truck side guards and other safety measures to improve safety for cyclists - by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the General Manager of Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on:
a. the feasibility of the City of Toronto implementing side guards on its own City of Toronto large trucks, both new vehicles and retrofits; and
b. the feasibility of a truck side guard policy whereby the City conducts business with only or prefers business with companies whose large trucks are equipped with side guards.
2. City Council request the General Manager of Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee on options for the introduction within the City of Toronto of safety measures that would increase pedestrian and cycling safety (e.g. truck side guards, convex mirror systems, additional turn signals, audible warning systems, right turn restrictions on heavily used cycling routes, additional cycling infrastructure).
3. City Council support and request that the Federation of Canadian Municipalities also support Bill C-344 calling for side under-run guards on large trucks.
4. City Council request the General Manager of Transportation Services to report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Commitee with an update to the May 2006 staff report (Report 4, Clause 8 of the Works Committee considered at June 27, 2006 Council meeting) entitled "Large Trucks and Cyclist/Pedestrian Safety", and that this update include:
a. Response from Transport Canada to the City's 2006 request regarding side guards on large trucks;
b. Response by other municipalities in the GTA to the 1998 Regional Coroner's recommendation;
c. Post 2005 collision information involving cyclists;
d. Results of the Transportation Association of Canada (TAC) study on "Safe Accomodation of Vulnerable Road Users and Large Commercial Vehicles"; and
e. Information on how other jurisdictions within the GTA, Canada and internationally have addressed the issue of large trucks and pedestrian and cyclist safety.
Background Information (City Council)
Communications (City Council)
MM14.17 - Consideration of Families with School-Aged Children in sale of 22 Toronto Community Housing Corporation Houses - by Councillor Mike Layton, seconded by Councillor Paul Ainslie
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Withdrawn
- Wards:
- 14 - Parkdale-High Park, 19 - Trinity-Spadina, 21 - St. Paul's, 22 - St. Paul's, 28 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale, 29 - Toronto-Danforth, 30 - Toronto-Danforth, 32 - Beaches-East York
City Council Decision
Motion MM14.17 was withdrawn at City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011.
Background Information (City Council)
Communications (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/comm/communicationfile-27083.pdf
MM14.18 - 1183 Queen Street East: Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - by Councillor Paula Fletcher, seconded by Councillor Mary Fragedakis
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 30 - Toronto-Danforth
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing relating to the consent and variance applications for 1183 Queen Street East to oppose the appeals.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to agree to a settlement at the Ontario Municipal Board, subject to the registration of a common element plan of condominium that addresses all shared features of the development, to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Planning, South District.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42574.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Consent - B0086/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42578.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0751/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42579.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0752/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42581.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0753/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42582.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0754/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42583.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0755/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42584.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0756/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42585.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0757/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42586.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0758/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42587.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0759/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42588.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0760/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42589.pdf
1183 Queen Street East, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission - A0761/10TEY
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42590.pdf
MM14.19 - Fees for Motorcycle Parking - by Councillor Mike Del Grande, seconded by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to the February 6 and 7, 2012 meeting of City Council, through the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, on options for the implementation and enforcement of parking charges and fees regarding motorcycles and motor scooters.
2. City Council direct the General Manager, Transportation Services, in preparing the report, to review the City's pay-and-display areas as well as the number of parking permits currently being exempted to determine the financial impact of the recommended changes to pay parking.
Background Information (City Council)
Communications (City Council)
(November 30, 2011) E-mail from Brain Coutinho (MM.New.MM14.19.2)
(November 30, 2011) E-mail from Mark Celinscak (MM.New.MM14.19.3)
(November 30, 2011) E-mail from Ryan Suarez (MM.New.MM14.19.4)
(November 30, 2011) E-mail from Rory Cummings (MM.New.MM14.19.5)
(November 30, 2011) E-mail from Esmond Lee (MM.New.MM14.19.6)
(November 30, 2011) E-mail from Cal Lorimer (MM.New.MM14.19.7)
(November 30, 2011) E-mail from Ugur Dinc (MM.New.MM14.19.8)
(November 30, 2011) E-mail from Jason Fudge (MM.New.MM14.19.9)
MM14.20 - Nomination for Appointment to the Board of Directors - Crescent Town Club Inc. - by Councillor Janet Davis, seconded by Councillor Paula Fletcher
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 31 - Beaches-East York
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council nominate Kathy Priestman for appointment to the Crescent Town Community Centre, Board of Directors for the remainder of the three-year term expiring September 2012.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.21 - Request for Monitoring and Potential Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - for Appeal of B37/09EYK 1057/1059 Kipling Avenue - by Councillor Peter Milczyn, seconded by Councillor Mark Grimes
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to monitor the Ontario Municipal Board Appeal for 1057/1059 Kipling Avenue to ensure that the Applicant does not seek additional approvals and/or revert their application back to the one proposed in the Fall of 2010 to further divide the existing lots and create three new lots. If such approvals are filed for, the City Solicitor is to advise the local Councillor and Planning Staff.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing to defend the position of City Planning with respect to their opposition of three new lots being created if the Applicant does revert back to their original application from 2010, and seek additional approvals from the Ontario Municipal Board.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42712.pdf
(November 29, 2011) Committee of Adjustment Notices of Decision, 1057 and 1059 Kipling Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42695.pdf
MM14.22 - Improving Safety for Cyclists - by Councillor Ana Bailão, seconded by Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 18 - Davenport
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council request the General Manager, Transportation Services to review the collision report prepared by the Toronto Police Service with respect to the November 7, 2011 cyclist-motor vehicle collision at the intersection of Sterling Road and Dundas Street West and report to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, no later than the Spring of 2012, on any potential strategies for preventing future cyclist collisions at this location.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.23 - Ontario Municipal Board Hearing on 1901 Danforth Avenue - by Councillor Mary-Margaret McMahon, seconded by Councillor Ana Bailão
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 32 - Beaches-East York
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, and the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to attend the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing on January 26, 2012 in support of the Committee of Adjustment decision to deny the Minor Variance application regarding 1901 Danforth Avenue (A0917/11TEY).
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor to reach a mutually agreeable settlement, if possible, if a revised proposal is submitted to the satisfaction of Legal and Planning staff; specifically, the proposal could address Planning staff concerns, if revised to decrease the number of dwelling units, increase the setback between the interior dwelling unit windows and the wall of the adjacent building, comply with the rear angular plane, and comply with the setback from the adjacent Residential district.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42715.pdf
(November 29, 2011) Committee of Adjustment, Notice of Decision, Minor Variance/Permission 1901 Danforth Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42706.pdf
MM14.24 - 2256-2270 Lawrence Avenue West - Technical Amendment to By-law No. 998-2010 - by Councillor Doug Ford, seconded by Councillor Frances Nunziata
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 2 - Etobicoke North
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend By-law No. 998-2010, substantially in the form of the attached draft by-law, to provide that notwithstanding the provisions of the Zoning Code:
a. only semi-detached dwellings shall be permitted; and
b. a maximum coverage of 42 percent of the lot area shall be permitted on non-corner lots, and a maximum coverage of 39 percent of the lot area shall be permitted on corner lots.
2. City Council, pursuant to Section 34(17) of the Planning Act, hereby determine that no further notice to the public is required in respect of the proposed amendments to By-law No. 998-2010.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft amending By-law as may be required.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42709.pdf
Draft by-law - Techincal Amendment to By-law No. 998-2010
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42707.pdf
MM14.25 - Appeal of Committee of Adjustment Decisions Respecting the Severance and Minor Variance for 500 Cummer Avenue (File Nos. A627/11NY and B048/11NY) and Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - by Councillor David Shiner, second by Councillor Karen Stintz
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 24 - Willowdale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to appeal the decisions of the Committee of Adjustment respecting the severance and minor variance for 500 Cummer Avenue (File Nos. A627/11NY and B048/11N), and direct the City Solicitor to attend the Ontario Municipal Board hearing in support of City Council's appeals, including retaining an outside independent land use planner to provide evidence at the hearing.
2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any further steps necessary to implement this Motion.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42710.pdf
(November 29, 2011) Committee of Adjustment, Notice of Decision, Consent - 500 Cummer Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42708.pdf
MM14.26 - Comprehensive Review to investigate the legality and impact on individuals and the community of indoor smoking in public lounges and businesses of substances in water pipes and other apparatus - by Councillor Mark Grimes, seconded by Councillor Cesar Palacio
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council direct the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards, in consultation with appropriate City Officials, to undertake a comprehensive review into the legality of businesses operating as "Vapour Lounges" and their impact on the neighbourhoods in which they locate, and report back to the February 2012 City Council meeting, through the Licensing and Standards Committee, on their findings, such report to include comments from the Chief of Police, the Medical Officer of Health and the Executive Director, Municipal Licensing and Standards.
2. City Council direct that the report also include:
a. recommendations on any changes to City approval processes and regulations for licensing such businesses and smoking by-laws to better control this activity; and
b actions to be taken on ongoing monitoring of the existing businesses to ensure illegal activity is not happening on the premises, and they are undertaking only those activities permitted in their licences.
3. City Council direct that until the report requested in Part 1 above is considered by City Council, no further businesses undertaking this activity be licensed in the City of Toronto.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.27 - Expropriation-Covenants held by 26 Country Lane Prohibiting Canadian Film Centre's Proposed Improvements to 2489 Bayview Avenue - by Councillor David Shiner, seconded by Councillor Karen Stintz
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 25 - Don Valley West
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council, as approving authority under the Expropriations Act, approve, upon the terms listed below, the application for approval to expropriate the rights, under registered restrictive covenants in favour of 26 Country Lane, to approve structures and parking areas in that portion of the City's Windfields Park described as PART 15 on Reference Plan R.S.-629, (which PART 15 includes the lands and buildings leased by the City to the Canadian Film Centre):
a. the expropriation of the restrictive covenants (quoted below) shall be in effect only for the limited period commencing on the date of registration of the plan of expropriation to December 31, 2013;
b. the limited expropriation of the covenants (quoted below) is being approved for park and municipal purposes, including economic development of the premises leased by the City to the Canadian Film Centre;
c. such limited expropriation is being approved to remove from the property known as 26 Country Lane the benefit of the following two quoted restrictive covenants (where 26 Country Lane is referred to as the "dominant tenement"):
"2. No building or structure shall be erected upon the said lands (Part 15 on RS-629 of City's Windfields Park) unless the dimensions (including height) and location thereof as indicated by a siting plan shall have been first submitted to and approved in writing by the owners for the time being of the dominant tenement or the nominee for the time being of such owner, and no building or structure shall be constructed or placed upon the said lands otherwise than in conformity with such dimensions and siting plan."
"3. No part of the said lands (Part 15 on RS-629 of City's Windfields Park) shall be used for parking purposes other than areas specifically designated for that purpose, and no parking area shall be laid out or constructed on the said lands or any part thereof unless the plans, dimensions and location thereof have been first submitted to and approved in writing by the owners for the time being of the dominant tenement (or the nominee for the time being of such owners, and no parking area shall be laid out or constructed upon the said lands otherwise than in conformity with such plans, dimensions and location."
2. City Council grant authority to apply to Court for an order permitting the City to take early possession of the expropriated property rights set out herein, if necessary, in order to permit expedited construction to commence on the lands leased by the Canadian Film Centre.
3. City Council grant leave to introduce the necessary Bill in Council for the City, as an expropriating authority under the Expropriations Act, to exercise its power to authorize the said expropriation, by enacting the Expropriation Bylaw.
4. City Council authorize the public release of the confidential information contained in Attachment 1 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer once the City Solicitor is satisfied that there has been a final determination by arbitration, appeal or settlement, of the compensation payable by the City arising out of the said expropriation.
Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 22, 2011) from the Chief Corporate Officer remains confidential in its entirety at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it relates to a proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes. The confidential information will be made public once the City Solicitor is satisfied that there has been a final determination by arbitration, appeal or settlement, of the compensation payable by the City arising out of the said expropriation.
Confidential Attachment - A proposed or pending acquisition or sale of land for municipal or local board purposes
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42575.pdf
(November 22, 2011) Report from the Chief Corporate Officer regarding Expropriation - Covenants held by 26 Country Lane prohibiting Canadian Film Centre's proposed improvements to 2489 Bayview Avenue, Windfields Park
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42576.pdf
Appendix "A" - Site Map - Canadian Film Centre's proposed improvements to 2489 Bayview Avenue submitted by the Chief Corporate Officer
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42577.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
MM14.28 - Nairn Park restoration and measures to address flooding concerns - by Councillor Cesar Palacio, seconded by Councillor Glenn De Baeremaeker
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Ward:
- 17 - Davenport
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, deferred consideration of Motion MM14.28 to the next regular City Council meeting on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor to consider the items remaining on the agenda.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council on December 1, 2011 adopted a motion to defer any remaining Items on the agenda to the next regular meeting of City Council on February 6 and 7, 2012 or to a special meeting called by the Mayor for that purpose.
The following Items were subsequently deferred:
Planning and Growth Management Committee Item PG9.11
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.5
Public Works and Infrastructure Committee Item PW9.10
New Business Item CC14.7, and
Member Motion MM14.28
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.29 - Zoning By-law Amendment to Regulate discharge and Manufacture of Firearms - by Councillor Peter Milczyn, seconded by Councillor Norm Kelly
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council adopt the confidential instructions issued to staff in the closed session.
2. City Council direct that the confidential instructions adopted by City Council and Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 30, 2011) from the City Solicitor remain confidential in their entirety as they relate to litigation that affects the City and they contain advice and communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
The confidential instructions adopted by City Council, together with Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 30, 2011) from the City Solicitor, remain confidential in their entirety in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as they relate to litigation that affects the City and they contain advice and communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
City Council Decision Advice and Other Information
City Council recessed its public session and met as Committee of the Whole in closed session on December 1, 2011, and considered confidential information on this Item as it relates to litigation or potential litigation that affects the City and advice and communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigation that affects the City and contains advice and communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42762.pdf
(November 30, 2011) Report from the City Solicitor regarding Zoning By-law Amendment to Regulate Discharge and Manufacture of Firearms
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42763.pdf
(November 30, 2011) Confidential Attachment #1 from the City Solicitor
MM14.30 - Rezoning Application for 9-21 Grenville Street - by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam, seconded by Councillor Mike Layton
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 27 - Toronto Centre-Rosedale
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council support the application for Zoning By-law Amendment and Site Plan Approval for 9-21 Grenville Street generally in accordance with the revised plans dated November 16, 2011 and date stamped by the Chief Planner November 21, 2011, subject to the draft Zoning By-law amendment, appended to the September 15, 2011, Planning Report (Attachment 6) being amended to reflect the above plans and to reflect the following changes:
a. the height of the proposed building be 50-storeys, with the maximum number of dwelling units not to exceed 495, with no other revisions to the envelope of the building;
b. a minimum of 126 parking spaces to be provided in a 5 level parking garage, including a maximum of 89 residents parking spaces, a maximum of 8 car-share parking spaces, and a minimum of 29 commercial parking spaces to be located in a public commercial parking garage. Any parking spaces not purchased by an owner of a residential unit in the proposed building will be set aside as part of the commercial parking garage; and
c. a Section 37 contribution in the total amount of $2,800,000, to be paid as follows:
i. prior to issuance of the first above grade permit, a payment of $800,000 towards Yonge Street and local area street improvements; and
ii. prior to the registration of the condominium corporation , and to be set out as a condition of draft condominium approval, a further payment of $2,000,000, comprised of the following: $1,130,000 towards Yonge Street and local area streetscaping improvements ; $500,000 towards the upgrade of St. Luke Lane ; $350,000 towards widening of sidewalks on Grenville Street and Wood Street ; and $20,000 towards LOFT Community Services for building improvements, or towards the works described above if such improvements are not feasible. These payments will not be subject to indexing, and, in consideration of the total payment of $2,800,000, no public art contribution will be required.
2. The Owner agrees to provide at least 42 dwelling units to be constructed in the building that are capable of being designed as three-bedroom dwelling units in compliance with the provisions of the Ontario Building Code, and these dwelling units will be shown on any marketing plans as three-bedroom units and will be marketed as potential three-bedroom dwelling units. These units may be sold and/or constructed with fewer bedrooms with provisions in the condominium documentation to allow renovation to three-bedroom units.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, in consultation with the Chief Planner, to make such revisions to the draft Zoning By-law (Attachment 6) as may be necessary to give effect to the above conditions.
4. The City endeavour to provide the applicant Notice of (Site Plan) Approval Conditions so as to implement the above by January 18, 2012.
5. Except as modified or altered by Parts 1 to 4 above, City Council's decision made on October 24 and 25, 2011, with respect to the applications (Item TE10.4) will continue to apply.
6. City Council direct the City Solicitor to attend before the Ontario Municipal Board to implement same, with the necessary Zoning By-law Amendment, Section 37 agreement and Notice of Approval (Site Plan) Conditions.
Background Information (City Council)
MM14.31 - Revisions to Composition of the Committee of Adjustment North York Panel and Appointments - by Councillor John Parker, seconded by Councillor Jaye Robinson
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council amend the composition of the Committee of Adjustment by increasing the number of members on the North York Panel from 5 to 8.
2. City Council appoint the three individuals listed in Confidential Attachment 1 to this Motion, previously identified as alternates for consideration in the event of a vacancy on the North York Panel, to the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment for a term of office ending on November 30, 2014 and until successors are appointed.
3. City Council stipulate that a maximum of five panel members may participate in any one meeting of the North York Panel of the Committee of Adjustment.
4. City Council authorize and direct the City Solicitor to introduce any necessary bills needed to give effect to the amendments to Municipal Code Chapter 4 of the City of Toronto Municipal Code.
City Council has appointed the following persons to the Committee of Adjustment North York Panel:
- Arthur Forer
- Morley A. Rosenberg
- Nicholas Sion
Confidential Attachment - Personal matters about identifiable individuals being considered for appointment to the Committee of Adjustment North York Panel
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/mm/bgrd/backgroundfile-42774.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1 - list of recommended appointees
City Council - Bills and By-laws - Meeting 14
BL14.1 - Introduction and Enactment of General Bills and Confirming Bills
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on November 29, 30 and December 1, 2011 enacted By-laws 1316-2011 to 1427-2011.
Background Information (City Council)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/bl/bgrd/backgroundfile-42524.pdf
Meeting Sessions
| Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011-11-29 | Morning | 9:38 AM | 12:33 PM | Public |
| 2011-11-29 | Afternoon | 2:11 PM | 7:02 PM | Public |
| 2011-11-29 | Evening | 7:12 PM | 7:39 PM | Closed |
| 2011-11-29 | Evening | 7:41 PM | 8:01 PM | Public |
| 2011-11-30 | Morning | 9:38 AM | 12:38 PM | Public |
| 2011-11-30 | Afternoon | 2:12 PM | 7:00 PM | Public |
| 2011-11-30 | Evening | 7:06 PM | 7:59 PM | Closed |
| 2011-11-30 | Evening | 8:02 PM | 8:36 PM | Public |
| 2011-12-01 | Morning | 9:45 AM | 10:36 AM | Public |
| 2011-12-01 | Morning | 10:45 AM | 12:27 PM | Closed |
| 2011-12-01 | Afternoon | 12:28 PM | 12:30 PM | Public |
| 2011-12-01 | Afternoon | 2:08 PM | 3:13 PM | Public |
| 2011-12-01 | Afternoon | 3:25 PM | 4:50 PM | Closed |
| 2011-12-01 | Afternoon | 4:53 PM | 7:57 PM | Public |
Attendance
| Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
|---|---|---|
| 2011-11-29 9:38 AM - 12:33 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Pam McConnell, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Michael Thompson |
| 2011-11-29 11:09 AM - Roll Call |
Present |
Present: Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Mike Del Grande, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Doug Ford, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Cesar Palacio, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Raymond Cho, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Frank Di Giorgio, Mary Fragedakis, Chin Lee, Pam McConnell, Ron Moeser, John Parker, Anthony Perruzza, Michael Thompson, Adam Vaughan |
| 2011-11-29 11:37 AM - Roll Call |
Present |
Present: Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Mike Layton, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Josh Matlow, Pam McConnell, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Paul Ainslie, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, John Filion, Norman Kelly, Chin Lee, Giorgio Mammoliti, Ron Moeser, David Shiner, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-11-29 2:11 PM - 7:02 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Michelle Berardinetti, Pam McConnell, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-11-29 5:29 PM - Roll Call |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Frank Di Giorgio, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Mike Layton, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Cesar Palacio, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Michelle Berardinetti, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Norman Kelly, Chin Lee, Giorgio Mammoliti, Pam McConnell, Ron Moeser, John Parker, Anthony Perruzza, Michael Thompson, Adam Vaughan |
| 2011-11-29 7:12 PM - 7:39 PM (Closed Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Doug Holyday, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Pam McConnell, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Maria Augimeri, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Rob Ford, Mark Grimes, Norman Kelly, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Ron Moeser, Cesar Palacio, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-11-29 7:41 PM - 8:01 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Josh Colle, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Pam McConnell, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan Not Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Raymond Cho, Gary Crawford, John Filion, Rob Ford, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Ron Moeser, Jaye Robinson, Michael Thompson, Kristyn Wong-Tam |
| 2011-11-30 9:38 AM - 12:38 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Rob Ford, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Raymond Cho, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Pam McConnell, Peter Milczyn, Ron Moeser, John Parker, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-11-30 10:52 AM - Roll Call |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Josh Colle, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Rob Ford, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan Not Present: Raymond Cho, Gary Crawford, Glenn De Baeremaeker, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Chin Lee, Pam McConnell, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Michael Thompson, Kristyn Wong-Tam |
| 2011-11-30 2:12 PM - 7:00 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Rob Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Pam McConnell, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Norman Kelly, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-11-30 3:18 PM - Roll Call |
Present |
Present: Michelle Berardinetti, Gary Crawford, Janet Davis, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Cesar Palacio, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Jaye Robinson, Adam Vaughan Not Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Vincent Crisanti, Glenn De Baeremaeker, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Norman Kelly, Pam McConnell, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, John Parker, Anthony Perruzza, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson, Kristyn Wong-Tam |
| 2011-11-30 7:06 PM - 7:59 PM (Closed Session) |
Present |
Present: Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Janet Davis, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, John Parker, Gord Perks, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Vincent Crisanti, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Sarah Doucette, Josh Matlow, Pam McConnell, Cesar Palacio, James Pasternak, Anthony Perruzza, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-11-30 8:02 PM - 8:36 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Rob Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Maria Augimeri, Raymond Cho, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Pam McConnell, John Parker, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-12-01 9:45 AM - 10:36 AM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Rob Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Maria Augimeri, John Filion, Giorgio Mammoliti, Pam McConnell, Ron Moeser, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-12-01 10:45 AM - 12:27 PM (Closed Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Maria Augimeri, John Filion, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Pam McConnell, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-12-01 12:28 PM - 12:30 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Rob Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Maria Augimeri, John Filion, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Giorgio Mammoliti, Pam McConnell, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-12-01 2:08 PM - 3:13 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Rob Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, Karen Stintz, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Giorgio Mammoliti, Pam McConnell, David Shiner, Michael Thompson |
| 2011-12-01 3:25 PM - 4:50 PM (Closed Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Rob Ford, Mark Grimes, Doug Holyday, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, Adam Vaughan Not Present: Ana Bailão, Vincent Crisanti, Mary Fragedakis, Norman Kelly, Giorgio Mammoliti, Pam McConnell, Peter Milczyn, James Pasternak, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson, Kristyn Wong-Tam |
| 2011-12-01 4:53 PM - 7:57 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Rob Ford, Doug Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Mark Grimes, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio, John Parker, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, Adam Vaughan, Kristyn Wong-Tam Not Present: Doug Holyday, Giorgio Mammoliti, Pam McConnell, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson |