Minutes Confirmed on November 15, 2016
Scarborough Community Council
- Meeting No.:
- 17
- Contact:
- Yvonne Davies, Committee Administrator
- Meeting Date:
- Thursday, October 13, 2016
- Phone:
- 416-396-7287
- Start Time:
- 9:30 AM
- E-mail:
- scc@toronto.ca
- Location:
- Council Chamber, Scarborough Civic Centre
- Chair:
- Councillor Chin Lee
SC17.1 - Celebrating Manufacturing and Technology in Scarborough - Opportunities for the Future
- Decision Type:
- Presentation
- Status:
- Received
- Wards:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest, 36 - Scarborough Southwest, 37 - Scarborough Centre, 38 - Scarborough Centre, 39 - Scarborough-Agincourt, 40 - Scarborough Agincourt, 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 42 - Scarborough-Rouge River, 43 - Scarborough East, 44 - Scarborough East
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Received the Presentation for information.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Chair, on behalf of Scarborough Community Council, thanked Jocelyn Williams, Andrew Arifuzzaman, Andrew Petrou, Hitesh Talati and Ralph Idems for their presentation.
Summary
Jocelyn Williams of Automatic Coating, Brad Bourne of Firan Technology Group and Ralph Idems of CIVIQ Smartscapes (formerly Vertigo Digital Displays) will talk about their businesses, why manufacturing and technology matters and how they can assist with youth unemployment in Scarborough.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96566.pdf
Speakers
Andrew Arifuzzaman, Chief Administrative Officer, Business, Operations and Strategic Affairs, University of Toronto
Andrew Petrou, Executive Director, Downsview Aerospace Innovation and Research
Hitesh Talati, Vice President and General Manager, Firan Technology Group Corporation
Ralph Idems, Managing Director, Sales for DOOH, CIVIQ Smartscapes (formerly Vertigo Digital Displays)
Motions
That the item be received for information.
SC17.2 - Request for a Fence Exemption - Rear Yard - 70 Cree Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 36 - Scarborough Southwest
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption permit at 70 Cree Avenue, for the existing fence Pool Enclosure to remain in the rear yard; and directed and requires that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Scarborough Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council concerning an application by the property owner of 70 Cree Avenue for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-5.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Council's permission to be exempt from the requirement for a Pool Enclosure fence to be 1.2 m away from the water's edge, which does not comply with the location restrictions in Section 447-3 E. (1) (a) of the by-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96547.pdf
Notice of Consideration - Request for a Fence Exemption - Rear Yard - 70 Cree Avenue
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96548.pdf
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council:
1. Grant the application for a fence exemption permit at 70 Cree Avenue, for the existing fence Pool Enclosure to remain in the rear yard. Direct and require that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
SC17.3 - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 29 MacDuff Crescent
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 36 - Scarborough Southwest
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption permit at 29 MacDuff Crescent, thereby allowing the fence (hedge) to remain at a height not to exceed 2 metres; directed and requires that the fence (hedge) be maintained in good repair; directed and requires that at any such time the fence (hedge) is removed a replacement of the fence is required and that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Scarborough Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council concerning an application by the property owner of 29 Macduff Crescent for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-5.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Council's permission to maintain a fence (hedge) which does not comply with maximum fence height restrictions stipulated by Section 447-2 of the by-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96507.pdf
Notice of Consideration - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 29 MacDuff Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96756.pdf
Speakers
Stephen Haines
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council:
1. Grant the application for a fence exemption permit at 29 MacDuff Crescent, thereby allowing the fence (hedge) to remain. Direct and require that the fence (hedge) be maintained in good repair. Direct and require that at any such time the fence (hedge) is removed a replacement of the fence is required and that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
Vote (Amend Item) Oct-13-2016
Result: Carried | Majority Required |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 5 | Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Gary Crawford, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Jim Karygiannis, Michael Thompson |
Total members that voted No: 3 | Members that voted No are Michelle Holland, Norman Kelly, Chin Lee (Chair) |
Total members that were Absent: 1 | Members that were absent are Ron Moeser |
That Motion 1 by Councillor Crawford be amended by adding the words "no higher than 2 metres" to the first sentence.
Vote (Amend Motion) Oct-13-2016
Result: Carried | Majority Required |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 5 | Members that voted Yes are Michelle Holland, Jim Karygiannis, Norman Kelly, Chin Lee (Chair), Michael Thompson |
Total members that voted No: 3 | Members that voted No are Paul Ainslie, Gary Crawford, Glenn De Baeremaeker |
Total members that were Absent: 1 | Members that were absent are Ron Moeser |
That the Scarborough Community Council:
1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the property owner of 29 MacDuff Crescent to maintain a fence (hedge), that fails to comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences.
SC17.4 - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 4 Benary Crescent
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 38 - Scarborough Centre
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption permit at 4 Benary Crescent, for a proposed 1.8 m high wood fence located in the front and flankage yards; directed and requires the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration; and directed and requires that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Scarborough Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council concerning an application by the property owner of 4 Benary Crescent for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-5.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Council's permission to exempt an existing 1.8 m high wood fence located in the front yard and flankage yard which does not comply with maximum fence height restrictions contrary to Section 447-2 (B)(1) of the by-law and requirement for a chain-link fence or of an equivalent open-fence construction for at least 2.4 metres from the lot line at a driveway contrary to Section 447-2 C. (1) of the by-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96508.pdf
Notice of Consideration - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 4 Benary Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96757.pdf
Communications
(October 10, 2016) E-mail from Andy Ford (SC.New.SC17.4.2)
(October 10, 2016) E-mail from Kyla Chan (SC.New.SC17.4.3)
(October 10, 2016) E-mail from Andrea Rodriguez and Imran Khan (SC.New.SC17.4.4)
(October 11, 2016) E-mail from Danny Wildish (SC.New.SC17.4.5)
(October 11, 2016) E-mail from Allan Wen (SC.New.SC17.4.6)
(October 12, 2016) E-mail from Tawnee Dulce (SC.New.SC17.4.7)
(October 12, 2016) E-mail from Tanja Rukavina (SC.New.SC17.4.8)
(October 12, 2016) E-mail from Mr. and Mrs. Almario and Family (SC.New.SC17.4.9)
Speakers
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council:
1. Grant the application for a fence exemption permit at 4 Benary Crescent, for a proposed 1.8 m high wood fence located in the front and flankage yards. Direct and require the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
SC17.5 - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 2 Porchester Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 38 - Scarborough Centre
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council deferred consideration of the item until the next meeting on November 15, 2016.
Origin
Summary
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Scarborough Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council concerning an application by the property owner of 2 Porchester Drive for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-5.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Council's permission to exempt a proposed 2.0 m high wood fence located in the front yard which does not comply with maximum fence height restrictions contrary to Section 447-2 of the by-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96521.pdf
Notice of Consideration - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 2 Porchester Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96522.pdf
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the next meeting on November 15, 2016.
SC17.6 - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 141 Earlton Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 40 - Scarborough Agincourt
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Refused to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the property owner of 141 Earlton Road, for a proposed fence that fails to comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences.
Origin
Summary
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Scarborough Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council concerning an application by the property owner of 141 Earlton Road for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-5.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Council's permission to allow a metal picket fence in the front yard which does not comply with maximum fence height restrictions stipulated by Section 447-2 of the by-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96503.pdf
Notice of Consideration - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 141 Earlton Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96504.pdf
Communications
(October 10, 2016) E-mail from Charles Adey (SC.New.SC17.6.2)
(October 10, 2016) E-mail from Patricia Adey (SC.New.SC17.6.3)
(October 11, 2016) Letter from N. McKinlay (SC.New.SC17.6.4)
(October 8, 2016) E-mail from Maria DonPaul (SC.New.SC17.6.5)
(October 8, 2016) E-mail from Rodney DonPaul (SC.New.SC17.6.6)
(October 8, 2016) E-mail from Craig Cresswell (SC.New.SC17.6.7)
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council:
1. Refuse to grant the application for an exemption permit, by the property owner of 141 Earlton Road, for a proposed fence that fails to comply with the provisions of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447, Fences.
SC17.7 - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 9 Frolick Crescent
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 43 - Scarborough East
Public Notice Given
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Granted the application for a fence exemption permit at 9 Frolick Crescent, for a proposed 2.0 m high wood fence located in the front yard; directed and requires the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration; and directed and requires that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
Origin
Summary
This staff report concerns a matter for which the Scarborough Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The purpose of this report is to advise Council concerning an application by the property owner of 9 Frolick Crescent for a site-specific Fence Exemption, pursuant to Section 447-5.C of Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447- Fences. The property owner is seeking Council's permission to exempt a proposed 2.0 m high wood fence located in the front yard which does not comply with maximum fence height restrictions contrary to Section 447-2 of the bylaw.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96506.pdf
Notice of Consideration - Request for a Fence Exemption - Front Yard - 9 Frolick Crescent
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96846.pdf
Communications
Speakers
Charankan Chandrakanthan
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council:
1. Grant the application for a fence exemption permit at 9 Frolick Crescent, for a proposed 2.0 m high wood fence located in the front yard. Direct and require the installation be maintained in good repair without alteration. Direct and require that at such time as replacement of the fence is required that such installation will comply with Municipal Code Chapter 447, or its successor by-law.
SC17.8 - Residential Demolition Application - 1396 Kingston Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 36 - Scarborough Southwest
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Approved the application to demolish the building at 1396 Kingston Road containing two vacant residential units with the following conditions:
a. that a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article III; if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. that sod be laid on the site and the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5 and 629-10, paragraph B;
d. that any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill;
e. that all privately and publicly owned trees, which are protected by the City of Toronto By-laws, be protected in accordance with the By-laws during the demolition process;
f. that the applicant for the demolition permit construct and substantially complete the new building to be erected on the site of the property where the building is to be demolished not later than two years from the day demolition of the existing building is commenced; and
g. that on failure to complete the new building within the time specified in (f) above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each dwelling unit contained in the residential property in respect of which the demolition permit is issued and that such sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land in respect of which the permit to demolish the residential property is issued.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the former City of Toronto Municipal Code Ch. 363, Article II “Demolition Control”, the application for the demolition of the vacant commercial building containing two vacant residential units at 1396 Kingston Road is referred to the Scarborough Community Council to refuse or to grant the application as a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.
If the Scarborough Community Council grants issuance of the demolition permit, it may impose conditions if any, to be attached to the demolition permit.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96119.pdf
Attachments 1-3 - Aerial View, Survey of the property and Applicant's letter - Residential Demolition Application - 1396 Kingston Road
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96160.pdf
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council adopt Recommendation 3 as follows:
3. Approve the application to demolish the building at 1396 Kingston Road containing two vacant residential units with the following conditions:
a. that a construction fence be erected in accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, Chapter 363, Article III; if deemed appropriate by the Chief Building Official;
b. that all debris and rubble be removed immediately after demolition;
c. that sod be laid on the site and the site be maintained free of garbage and weeds, in accordance with the Municipal Code Chapter 623-5 and 629-10, paragraph B;
d. that any holes on the property are backfilled with clean fill;
e. that all privately and publicly owned trees, which are protected by the City of Toronto By-laws, be protected in accordance with the By-laws during the demolition process;
f. that the applicant for the demolition permit construct and substantially complete the new building to be erected on the site of the property where the building is to be demolished not later than two years from the day demolition of the existing building is commenced; and
g. that on failure to complete the new building within the time specified in (f) above, the City Clerk shall be entitled to enter on the collector’s roll, to be collected in like manner as municipal taxes, the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000) for each dwelling unit contained in the residential property in respect of which the demolition permit is issued and that such sum shall, until payment, be a lien or charge upon the land in respect of which the permit to demolish the residential property is issued.
SC17.9 - 3 Acland Crescent - Application to Remove a Ravine-Protected Private Tree
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 44 - Scarborough East
Community Council Recommendations
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council deny the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned, ravine-protected tree located at 3 Acland Crescent.
Origin
Summary
This report requests that City Council deny the application for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned, ravine-protected tree located at 3 Acland Crescent. The application indicates the reasons for removal are that the tree is in a poor location, situated too close to an existing house and walkway, and that the walkway has been lifted by expanding roots.
The subject tree is a white pine (Pinus strobus), measuring 62 cm in diameter. Urban Forestry does not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96491.pdf
Communications
Speakers
David A. White, Certified Arborist
Motions
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council grant the request for a permit to remove one (1) privately-owned, ravine-protected tree located at 3 Acland Crescent on condition that the owner provide five replacement trees, which can be achieved in a combination of planting on site and cash-in-lieu of planting.
SC17.10 - Driveway Apron Parking: Painted Post Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Ward:
- 38 - Scarborough Centre
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council deferred consideration of the item until the next meeting on November 15, 2016.
Origin
Summary
This report responds to a request by Scarborough Community Council, at its meeting on April 5, 2016, for a report from the Director, Transportation Services, Scarborough District on a proposal to enact an amendment to the Municipal Code that would permit the use of the "driveway apron" (the section between the curb and sidewalk) for parking purposes on Painted Post Drive in Ward 38. The Municipal Code currently prohibits the use of this area for parking purposes across the City, with the exception of one street in Ward 8 (Shoreham Drive).
The exemption to the Municipal Code for Shoreham Drive was enacted by City Council in April 2015. Therefore, the full implications of this "apron parking" on Shoreham Drive are not yet known due, in part, to the relatively moderate winter the city experienced last season. Nevertheless, based on an assessment of the potential impacts of parked vehicles on traffic operations, pedestrian activity, and winter maintenance, and the potential safety implications, staff have concerns with the proposed exemption. The implications of this proposal and the basis of these concerns are presented in this report for information.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96097.pdf
Attachments 1-3 - Location Map, Roadway Dimensions and Photos of vehicles parked on the Painted Post Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96098.pdf
Communications
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/comm/communicationfile-62587.pdf
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council defer consideration of the item until the next meeting on November 15, 2016.
SC17.11 - Left-Turn Prohibitions - Ellesmere Road and Saratoga Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 38 - Scarborough Centre
Community Council Recommendations
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council prohibit northbound and westbound left turns from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at Ellesmere Road and Saratoga Drive.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends prohibiting both westbound and northbound left turns from 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, at the intersection of Ellesmere Road and Saratoga Drive. There are currently no prohibitions in effect.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96099.pdf
Location Plan - Ellesmere Road and Saratoga Drive
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96100.pdf
Motions
SC17.12 - Speed Limit Reduction - Elfreda Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Authorized the reduction of the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Elfreda Boulevard, between St. Clair Avenue East and Newlands Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report provides the results of a 40 km/h speed limit warrant analysis conducted on Elfreda Boulevard, between St. Clair Avenue East and Newlands Avenue. A 40 km/h speed limit is not technically justified on Elfreda Boulevard. Currently, the speed limit is an unsigned default 50 km/h.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96581.pdf
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council amend Recommendation 1 by deleting the word "not", to read as follows:
1. Scarborough Community Council reduce the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Elfreda Boulevard, between St. Clair Avenue East and Newlands Avenue.
SC17.13 - No Standing Zone - Marsh Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 35 - Scarborough Southwest
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Approved the prohibition of standing at all times on the east side of Marsh Road, between Danforth Road and a point 29 metres north, and on the west side of Marsh Road, between Danforth Road and a point 48 metres north.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The report recommends the installation of a No Standing Anytime parking regulation on both sides of Marsh Road, north of Danforth Road. Currently, a No Parking Anytime regulation is in effect at this location.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96582.pdf
Motions
SC17.14 - Traffic Control Signals Review - McCowan Road and Bridlegrove Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Ward:
- 36 - Scarborough Southwest
Community Council Recommendations
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of McCowan Road and Bridlegrove Drive.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends that traffic control signals not be approved at the intersection of McCowan Road and Bridlegrove Drive. The assessment concludes that based on current peak vehicular and pedestrian volumes and delays and conflicts at this intersection, traffic control signals are neither justified nor warranted at this time.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96608.pdf
Communications
(October 13, 2016) Petition from Councillor Crawford, signed by approximately 589 area residents, in support of the installation of traffic control signals at McCowan Road and Bridlegrove Drive (SC.New.SC17.14.2)
Speakers
Motions
That consideration of the item be deferred until the next meeting on November 15, 2016
That Scarborough Community Council amend Recommendation 1 by deleting the word "not", to read as follows:
That:
1. City Council approve the installation of traffic control signals at the intersection of McCowan Road and Bridelgrove Drive.
Vote (Amend Item) Oct-13-2016
Result: Carried | Majority Required |
---|---|
Total members that voted Yes: 7 | Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Gary Crawford, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Michelle Holland, Jim Karygiannis, Chin Lee (Chair), Michael Thompson |
Total members that voted No: 1 | Members that voted No are Norman Kelly |
Total members that were Absent: 1 | Members that were absent are Ron Moeser |
SC17.15 - No Stopping Zone - Ashtonbee Road at Hakimi Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 37 - Scarborough Centre
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Amended the parking prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Ashtonbee Road, between Lebovic Avenue and Warden Avenue, to be in effect between a point 654.5 metres east of Pharmacy Avenue and Warden Avenue.
2. Amended the stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the north side of Ashtonbee Road, between a point 479.5 metres east of Pharmacy Avenue and a point 45 metres further east, to be in effect between a point 479.5 metres east of Pharmacy Avenue and a point 175 metres further east.
3. Amended the parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Ashtonbee Road, between Lebovic Avenue and Warden Avenue, to be in effect between Hakimi Avenue and Warden Avenue.
4. Amended the stopping prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Ashtonbee Road, between a point 466 metres east of Pharmacy Avenue and Lebovic Avenue, to be in effect between a point 466 metres east of Pharmacy Avenue and Hakimi Avenue.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report recommends an amendment of the No Stopping Anytime regulation in order to provide a safe route for westbound traffic and to mitigate aggressive vehicular manoeuvers when vehicles stop to drop-off and pick-up passengers in front of the community college entrance on Ashtonbee Road at Hakimi Avenue. This report also recommends an update to the Toronto Municipal Code to refer to "Hakimi Avenue" instead of the previously named "Lebovic Avenue".
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96538.pdf
Motions
SC17.16 - No Parking Zone - Prudential Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 37 - Scarborough Centre
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council deferred consideration of the item until the next meeting on November 15, 2016.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report recommends that the existing No Parking zone along the north side of Prudential Drive be extended eastward to include the area in between the accesses to 100 Prudential Drive in order to mitigate the safety impact of vehicles being parked in this area. Currently the three-hour default parking regulation applies between the two accesses.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96583.pdf
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council defer consideration of the item until the next meeting on November 15, 2016.
SC17.17 - Compulsory Stop Control - Lamont Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 41 - Scarborough-Rouge River
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Approved the designation of Lamont Avenue, from Sheppard Avenue East to a point 167 metres south, as a through highway.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The report recommends the approval of a compulsory stop control on eastbound Lamont Avenue (east-west leg) at Lamont Avenue (north-south leg). Currently, the intersection is an uncontrolled three-way intersection.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96584.pdf
Motions
SC17.18 - Speed Limit Reduction - Guildwood Parkway
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 43 - Scarborough East
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Approved the reduction of the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Guildwood Parkway, between Kingston Road and Livingston Road and Poplar Road and Morningside Avenue, so that the speed limit on Guildwood Parkway between Kingston Road and Morningside Avenue will be 40 km/h.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report recommends that a 40 km/h speed limit on Guildwood Parkway, between Poplar Road and Morningside Avenue, be adopted. Currently, the speed limit is a signed 50 km/h on Guildwood Parkway, between Poplar Road and Morningside Avenue.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96585.pdf
Speakers
Motions
That:
1. Scarborough Community Council reduce the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Guildwood Parkway, between Kingston Road and Livingston Road and Poplar Road and Morningside Avenue, so that the speed limit on Guildwood Parkway between Kingston Road and Morningside Avenue will be 40 km/h.
SC17.19 - Lane Designations - Port Union Road and Highway 2A Eastbound Off-ramp/Island Road
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 44 - Scarborough East
Community Council Recommendations
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council designate the southerly eastbound lane on Highway 2A (eastbound off-ramp), from Port Union Road to a point 65 metres west, for right turns only.
2. City Council designate the centre eastbound lane on Highway 2A (eastbound off-ramp), from Port Union Road to a point 65 metres west, for through movements only.
3. City Council designate the northerly eastbound lane on Highway 2A (eastbound off-ramp), from Port Union Road to a point 75 metres west, for left turns only.
4. City Council designate the northerly westbound lane on Island Road, from Port Union Road to a point 45 metres east, for right turns only.
5. City Council designate the southerly westbound lane on Island Road, from Port Union Road to a point 45 metres east, for left turns only.
Origin
Summary
This report recommends the designations of eastbound and westbound lanes at this intersection. Currently, the lanes are partially marked and signed but are not designated in Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96615.pdf
Motions
SC17.20 - Speed Limit Reduction - Ravenview Drive
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 44 - Scarborough East
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Approved the reduction of the speed limit from 50 km/h to 40 km/h on Ravenview Drive between Dunstall Crescent and Bennett Road.
Origin
Summary
This staff report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
The report recommends the approval of a 40 km/h speed limit on Ravenview Drive between Dunstall Crescent and Bennett Road. Currently, the speed limit is 50 km/h.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96618.pdf
Motions
SC17.21 - Stopping and Standing Prohibitions - East Avenue
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Deferred Indefinitely
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
- Ward:
- 44 - Scarborough East
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council deferred consideration of the item indefinitely.
Origin
Summary
This report is about a matter for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.
This report recommends that No Standing and No Stopping zones be approved for East Avenue, north of Island Road in order to mitigate the impact of parked vehicles blocking this narrow street and accesses along it. Currently, the unposted three-hour parking regulation is in effect.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96619.pdf
Communications
(October 11, 2016) E-mail from George Voulgaris (SC.New.SC17.21.2)
Motions
SC17.22 - Request for Attendance at an Ontario Municipal Board Hearing - Support of the Committee of Adjustment Decision for 46 Valhalla Boulevard
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 36 - Scarborough Southwest
Community Council Recommendations
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to support the Committee of Adjustment decision denying consent for 46 Valhalla Boulevard (File B034/16SC, A192/16SC, A193/16SC and A194/16SC).
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor and City Planning to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the appeal sought for 46 Valhalla Boulevard (File B034/16SC, A192/16SC, A193/16SC and A194/16SC).
Origin
Summary
On September 8th, 2016 the application for consent to sever the property at 46 Valhalla Boulevard (File B034/16SC, A192/16SC, A193/16SC and A194/16SC) was denied by the Scarborough Committee of Adjustment. The applicant sought consent to sever the land into three lots for three new detached houses. The original house would be demolished. The proposed Lot Division Plan was as follows: Part 1: Proposed frontage of 6.098 m whereas the minimum required lot frontage is 9 m. Part 2 Proposed frontage of 6.098 m whereas the minimum required lot frontage is 9 m. Part 3 Proposed frontage of 6.098 m whereas the minimum required lot frontage is 9 m.
The proposed consent is not in keeping with the characteristics of the immediate neighbourhood and does not conform to the policies in the official plan
As well, numerous objections have been received from the immediate neighbours and residents in the area that they do not support the severance.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96854.pdf
Attachment 1 - Committee of Adjustment Notice of Decision for 46 Valhalla Boulevard (File B034/16SC, A192/16SC, A193/16SC and A194/16SC)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96856.pdf
Motions
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council direct the City Solicitor to support the Committee of Adjustment decision denying consent for 46 Valhalla Boulevard (File B034/16SC, A192/16SC, A193/16SC and A194/16SC).
2. City Council direct the City Solicitor and City Planning to attend the Ontario Municipal Board to oppose the appeal sought for 46 Valhalla Boulevard (File B034/16SC, A192/16SC, A193/16SC and A194/16SC).
SC17.23 - 37 Kecala Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 37 - Scarborough Centre
Public Notice Given
Statutory - Planning Act, RSO 1990
Community Council Recommendations
Scarborough Community Council recommends that:
1. City Council amend the Dorset Park Community Zoning By-law No. 9508 for the lands at 37 Kecala Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 8 to report dated September 22, 2016, from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
2. City Council amend City of Toronto Zoning By-law 569-2013 for the lands at 37 Kecala Road substantially in accordance with the draft Zoning By-law Amendment attached as Attachment 9 to report dated September 22, 2016, from the Acting Director, Community Planning, Scarborough District.
3. City Council authorize the City Solicitor to make such stylistic and technical changes to the draft Zoning By-law Amendments as may be required.
Decision Advice and Other Information
The Scarborough Community Council held a statutory public meeting on October 13, 2016, and notice was given in accordance with the Planning Act.
Origin
Summary
This application proposes to amend the Zoning By-law by replacing existing Place of Worship zoning with appropriate new residential zoning and development standards to permit 8 single-family residential lots, each with a detached dwelling fronting on Kecala Road. Seven of the dwellings would be of new construction while an existing heritage-listed single family dwelling on the east end of the property would be maintained. (The existing place of worship structure on the property is proposed to be demolished.)
The proposal complies with the Official Plan, conforms to the Growth Plan for the Greater Golden Horseshoe and is consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement.
This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96574.pdf
Notice of Public Meeting - 37 Kecala Road - Zoning Amendment Application - Final Report
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-96575.pdf
Speakers
Motions
SC17.24 - Engraved Bench Donation for McCowan District Park
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Ward:
- 36 - Scarborough Southwest
Community Council Decision
Scarborough Community Council:
1. Requested Parks, Forestry and Recreation in consultation with Economic Development and Culture staff to investigate the feasibility of accepting the donation of one engraved granite bench from Resthaven Memorial Gardens and report back to the next meeting of Scarborough Community Council on November 15, 2016, with their recommendations, as well as any possible issues involving installation, location and maintenance.
Origin
Summary
Following an extensive parkland enhancement project, McCowan District Park is scheduled to officially open in December 2016. This 20-acre park will operate year round activities including: an outdoor skating rink and skating path, a splash pad, sports field, community green space, playground and recreational trails.
Community members were recently able to secure a granite bench valued at approximately $5,000, donated by Resthaven Memorial Gardens at no cost to the City, engraved to commemorate Yen Zhang - a 36 year old mother who lost her life to a drunk driver in the area ten years ago.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-97263.pdf
Motions
That Scarborough Community Council:
1. Request Parks, Forestry and Recreation in consultation with Economic Development and Culture staff to investigate the feasibility of accepting the donation of one engraved granite bench from Resthaven Memorial Gardens and report back to the next meeting of Scarborough Community Council on November 15, 2016, with their recommendations, as well as any possible issues involving installation, location and maintenance.
SC17.25 - Enactment of By-laws
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Schedule Type:
- Delegated
Community Council Decision
General Bills
Scarborough Community Council enacted By-laws 1011-2016 to 1015-2016.
Confirmatory Bill
Scarborough Community Council passed a Confirmatory Bill as By-law 1016-2016.
Summary
Introduction and consideration of bills for enactment of By-laws
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2016/sc/bgrd/backgroundfile-97355.htm
Motions
That the Scarborough Community Council pass and declare as by-laws Bills 1003 to 1005, 1007, and 1009 prepared for the October 13, 2016 Meeting 17 of the Community Council.
Bill No. |
By-law No. |
Status |
Title and Authority |
By-laws - October 13, 2016 |
|||
1003 |
1011-2016 |
Enacted |
To authorize the naming of the private road located at 875 Morningside Avenue and 3290 Ellesmere Road as "Pan Am Drive". Item SC16.1, as adopted by Scarborough Community Council on September 7, 2016 under the delegated authority of Sections 27-149B and 27-152 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. |
1004 |
1012-2016 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Marsh Road. Item SC17.13, as adopted by Scarborough Community Council on October 13, 2016 under the delegated authority of Sections 27-149B and 27-152 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. |
1005 |
1013-2016 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Ashtonbee Road. Item SC17.15, as adopted by Scarborough Community Council on October 13, 2016 under the delegated authority of Sections 27-149B and 27-152 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. |
1007 |
1014-2016 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Lamont Avenue. Item SC17.17, as adopted by Scarborough Community Council on October 13, 2016 under the delegated authority of Sections 27-149B and 27-152 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. |
1009 |
1015-2016 |
Enacted |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Ravenview Drive. Item SC17.20, as adopted by Scarborough Community Council on October 13, 2016 under the delegated authority of Sections 27-149B and 27-152 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. |
That the Scarborough Community Council pass and declare as a by-law a confirmatory bill to confirm the legislative proceeding of the Scarborough Community Council acting under delegated authority at Meeting 17 on October 13, 2016.
1044 |
1016-2016 |
Enacted |
To confirm the proceedings of Scarborough Community Council at Meeting 17 held on October 13, 2016 as it relates to decisions made under delegated authority. (This final confirming By-law confirms the actions taken by Community Council under delegated authority at this meeting, including the enactment of any previous confirming By-laws.) |
Withdrawn Bills
Bill No. |
By-law No. |
Status |
Title and Authority |
1006 |
Withdrawn |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Prudential Drive. Item SC17.16, deferred by Scarborough Community Council on October 13, 2016 under the delegated authority of Sections 27-149B and 27-152 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. |
|
1008 |
Withdrawn |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting Guildwood Parkway. Item SC17.18, adopted as amended, by Scarborough Community Council on October 13, 2016 under the delegated authority of Sections 27-149B and 27-152 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. |
|
1010 |
Withdrawn |
To amend City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 950, Traffic and Parking, respecting East Avenue. Item SC17.21, deferred indefinitely by Scarborough Community Council on October 13, 2016 under the delegated authority of Sections 27-149B and 27-152 of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 27, Council Procedures. |
Procedural Motions
That the Minutes of the Scarborough Community Council held on September 7, 2016, be confirmed.
Chin Lee, Chair, Scarborough Community Council
Meeting Sessions
Session Date | Session Type | Start Time | End Time | Public or Closed Session |
---|---|---|---|---|
2016-10-13 | Morning | 9:38 AM | 1:25 PM | Public |
2016-10-13 | Afternoon | 1:30 PM | 1:40 PM | Public |
Attendance
Date and Time | Quorum | Members |
---|---|---|
2016-10-13 9:38 AM - 1:25 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Gary Crawford, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Michelle Holland, Jim Karygiannis, Norman Kelly, Chin Lee (Chair), Michael Thompson Not Present: Ron Moeser |
2016-10-13 1:30 PM - 1:40 PM (Public Session) |
Present |
Present: Paul Ainslie, Gary Crawford, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Jim Karygiannis, Norman Kelly, Chin Lee (Chair), Michael Thompson Not Present: Michelle Holland, Ron Moeser |