Item - 2011.AU1.9
Tracking Status
- City Council adopted this item on March 8, 2011 with amendments.
- This item was considered by the Audit Committee on February 22, 2011 and adopted without amendment. It will be considered by City Council on March 8, 2011.
AU1.9 - 2011 Audit Work Plan
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Amended
- Wards:
- All
City Council Decision
City Council on March 8 amd 9, 2011, adopted the following:
1. City Council receive the Auditor General’s 2011 Audit Work Plan.
2. City Council request the City Manager to report to the May 24, 2011 meeting of the Executive Committee on any legislative changes required to allow the Auditor General to conduct any review with respect to Toronto Hydro he may deem appropriate.
Background Information (Committee)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-35902.pdf
Communications (City Council)
Motions (City Council)
That the City Manager be requested to report to Executive Committee for its meeting of May 24, 2011, on any legislative changes required to allow the Auditor General to conduct any review he may deem appropriate with respect to Toronto Hydro.
Vote (Amend Item (Additional)) Mar-08-2011 4:04 PM
| Result: Carried | Majority Required - AU1.9 - Thompson motion 1 |
|---|---|
| Total members that voted Yes: 34 | Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Rob Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Josh Matlow, Pam McConnell, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Cesar Palacio, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson, Adam Vaughan |
| Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
| Total members that were Absent: 11 | Members that were absent are Josh Colle, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, John Filion, Mark Grimes, Giorgio Mammoliti, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, John Parker, James Pasternak, Kristyn Wong-Tam |
Vote (Adopt Item as Amended) Mar-08-2011 4:07 PM
| Result: Carried | Majority Required - AU1.9 - Item as amended |
|---|---|
| Total members that voted Yes: 34 | Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailão, Michelle Berardinetti, Shelley Carroll, Raymond Cho, Gary Crawford, Vincent Crisanti, Mike Del Grande, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Doug Ford, Rob Ford, Mary Fragedakis, Doug Holyday, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Chin Lee, Gloria Lindsay Luby, Josh Matlow, Pam McConnell, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Peter Milczyn, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Cesar Palacio, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, David Shiner, Karen Stintz, Michael Thompson, Adam Vaughan |
| Total members that voted No: 0 | Members that voted No are |
| Total members that were Absent: 11 | Members that were absent are Josh Colle, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, John Filion, Mark Grimes, Giorgio Mammoliti, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Ron Moeser, John Parker, James Pasternak, Kristyn Wong-Tam |
AU1.9 - 2011 Audit Work Plan
- Decision Type:
- ACTION
- Status:
- Adopted
- Wards:
- All
Committee Recommendations
The Audit Committee recommends that:
1. City Council receive the Auditor General’s 2011 Audit Work Plan.
Origin
Summary
The purpose of this report is to provide City Council with details of the Auditor General’s 2011 Audit Work Plan. The 2011 Audit Work Plan is attached as Appendix 1 and Appendix 2 to this report. Appendix 3 includes audits completed during the last five years. Appendix 4 includes a summary of future potential audits.
The 2011 Audit Work Plan is a combination of audits in progress, new audits, annual recurring projects and investigative work carried out as a result of complaints received through the Fraud and Waste Hotline. Our Audit Work Plan also includes a formal follow-up review to ensure recommendations contained in previously issued audit reports, or as a result of investigative work, have been implemented.
Background Information
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2011/au/bgrd/backgroundfile-35902.pdf