Item - 2015.EY9.25

Tracking Status

  • City Council considered this item on November 3, 2015 and referred this item to an official or another committee or body. Consult the text of the decision for further information on the referral.
  • This item was considered by Etobicoke York Community Council on October 6, 2015 and was adopted with amendments. It will be considered by City Council on November 3, 2015.

EY9.25 - Holding Utility Companies Accountable to a Higher Standard of Repair

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Referred
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke North, 3 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 17 - Davenport

City Council Decision

City Council on November 3 and 4, 2015, referred Item EY9.25 to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, and requested the General Manager, Transportation Services to report to the Committee for consideration with this matter, on the following:

a.  an explanation of the current process in place for utility cut operations;

 

b.  a proposal to establish a notification process to affected Ward Councillors for 5 and 20 day utility cut permit applications;

 

c.  consideration for increased enforcement and inspection of utility cut work during completion;

 

d.  regular patrolling of completed work to ensure proper temporary standards;

 

e.  procedures to work with individual utility companies/organizations to improve any systematic and consistent problems;

 

f.  establishing appropriate fees for full cost recovery of all applicable permits;

 

g.  a process for Transportation Services to initiate necessary repairs for completed temporary utility cuts and bill the affected utility company if not compliant with requests;

 

h.  a provision that the surface will be returned to the original condition with the same quality of material within 18 months of the work being done;

 

i.  the establishment of service levels for these repairs to be completed, within an acceptable number of months.  If this timeline cannot be met, appropriate provisions be available to outsource the work in order to reduce further potential damage to City roads.  The local Councillor should be kept informed throughout, with respect to the process and any delays in service level accomplishments;

 

j.  provisions which identify the utility company, and the relevant contact person; and

 

k.  a notification process which includes all utility cuts, including those on private property.

Background Information (Community Council)

(August 19, 2015) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti - Ward 7 - York West - Holding Utility Companies Accountable to a Higher Standard of Repair
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-83685.pdf

Motions (City Council)

Motion to Refer Item (Carried)

As recommended by the Etobicoke York Community Council.

EY9.25 - Holding Utility Companies Accountable to a Higher Standard of Repair

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Wards:
1 - Etobicoke North, 2 - Etobicoke North, 3 - Etobicoke Centre, 4 - Etobicoke Centre, 5 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 6 - Etobicoke-Lakeshore, 7 - York West, 11 - York South-Weston, 12 - York South-Weston, 13 - Parkdale-High Park, 17 - Davenport

Community Council Recommendations

Etobicoke York Community Council recommends that:

 

1.  City Council refer this Item to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, with a request that the General Manager, Transportation Services, report to the Committee for consideration with this matter, on the following:

a.  an explanation of the current process in place for utility cut operations

 

b.  a proposal to establish a notification process to affected Ward Councillors for 5 and 20 day utility cut permit applications

 

c.  consideration for increased enforcement and inspection of utility cut work during completion

 

d.  regular patrolling of completed work to ensure proper temporary standards

 

e.  procedures to work with individual utility companies/organizations to improve any systematic and consistent problems

 

f.  establishing appropriate fees for full cost recovery of all applicable permits

 

g.  a process for Transportation Services to initiate necessary repairs for completed temporary utility cuts and bill the affected utility company if not compliant with requests

 

h.  a provision that the surface will be returned to the original condition with the same quality of material within 18 months of the work being done

 

i.  the establishment of service levels for these repairs to be completed, within an acceptable number of months.  If this timeline cannot be met, appropriate provisions be available to outsource the work in order to reduce further potential damage to City roads.  The local Councillor should be kept informed throughout, with respect to the process and any delays in service level accomplishments

 

j.  provisions which identify the utility company, and the relevant contact person

 

k.  a notification process which includes all utility cuts, including those on private property.

Origin

(August 19, 2015) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti - Ward 7 - York West

Summary

Over the course of several weeks, my office has seen a growing number of grievances regarding the quality of curb and apron repairs being undertaken by Utility companies. Under TS 4.60.07.03 of the Engineering and Construction Services Division Standard Specifications for Road Works, Utility companies are required to meet a certain standard of quality when applying temporary pavement restoration of mixed asphalt by neatly matching the finished grade of existing pavement. After visiting numerous sites with constituents who have expressed their grievances with the quality of the temporary repair work being done, it is undoubtedly clear that there is negligence with the standard of quality required for temporary curb cut restoration.

 

Therefore, in an effort to hold Utility companies accountable to a higher standard of repair when conducting curb cut restoration work in the Etobicoke York district, applicants should notify and work with Councillors prior to cutting City infrastructure in their wards.

Background Information

(August 19, 2015) Letter from Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti - Ward 7 - York West - Holding Utility Companies Accountable to a Higher Standard of Repair
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2015/ey/bgrd/backgroundfile-83685.pdf

Motions

1 - Motion to Amend Item moved by Councillor Giorgio Mammoliti (Amended)

That Etobicoke York Community Council recommend that:

 

1.  City Council refer this Item to the Public Works and Infrastructure Committee, with a request that the General Manager, Transportation Services, report to the Committee for consideration with this matter, on the following:

 

a.  an explanation of the current process in place for utility cut operations

 

b.  a proposal to establish a notification process to affected Ward Councillors for 5 and 20 day utility cut permit applications

 

c.  consideration for increased enforcement and inspection of utility cut work during completion

 

d.  regular patrolling of completed work to ensure proper temporary standards

 

e.  procedures to work with individual utility companies/organizations to improve any systematic and consistent problems

 

f.  establishing appropriate fees for full cost recovery of all applicable permits

 

g.  a process for Transportation Services to initiate necessary repairs for completed temporary utility cuts and bill the affected utility company if not compliant with requests.

Vote (Amend Item) Oct-06-2015

Result: Carried Majority Required - EY9.25 - Mammoliti - motion 1, as amended
Total members that voted Yes: 11 Members that voted Yes are John Campbell, Vincent Crisanti, Justin J. Di Ciano, Frank Di Giorgio, Sarah Doucette, Rob Ford, Mark Grimes (Chair), Stephen Holyday, Giorgio Mammoliti, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio
Total members that voted No: 0 Members that voted No are
Total members that were Absent: 0 Members that were absent are

2 - Motion to Amend Motion moved by Councillor Sarah Doucette (Carried)

That motion 1 by Councillor Mammoliti be amended so that the following is also addressed in the report:

 

- a provision that the surface will be returned to the original condition with the same quality of material within 18 months of the work being done.


3 - Motion to Amend Motion moved by Councillor Justin J. Di Ciano (Carried)

That motion 1 by Councillor Mammoliti be amended so that the following is also addressed in the report:

 

- the establishment of service levels for these repairs to be completed, within an acceptable number of months.  If this timeline cannot be met, appropriate provisions be available to outsource the work in order to reduce further potential damage to City roads.  The local Councillor should be kept informed throughout, with respect to the process and any delays in service level accomplishments.

Vote (Amend Motion) Oct-06-2015

Result: Carried Majority Required - EY9.25 - Di Ciano - motion 3
Total members that voted Yes: 8 Members that voted Yes are Vincent Crisanti, Justin J. Di Ciano, Frank Di Giorgio, Rob Ford, Stephen Holyday, Giorgio Mammoliti, Frances Nunziata, Cesar Palacio
Total members that voted No: 3 Members that voted No are John Campbell, Sarah Doucette, Mark Grimes (Chair)
Total members that were Absent: 0 Members that were absent are

4 - Motion to Amend Motion moved by Councillor Stephen Holyday (Carried)

That motion 1 by Councillor Mammoliti be amended so that the following is also addressed in the report:

 

- provisions which identify the utility company, and the relevant contact person.


5 - Motion to Amend Motion moved by Deputy Mayor Vincent Crisanti (Carried)

That motion 1 by Councillor Mammoliti be amended so that the following is also addressed in the report:

 

- a notification process which includes all utility cuts, including those on private property.


6 - Motion to Adopt Item as Amended (Carried)
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council