Item - 2017.PG23.7

Tracking Status

PG23.7 - Bill 139 - Proposed Amendments to the Planning Act and Province’s Land Use Planning Appeal System

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Wards:
All

City Council Decision

City Council on November 7, 8 and 9, 2017, adopted the following

 

1. City Council commend the Province on its initiative to significantly improve and modernize the Ontario Municipal Board and the Province's land use appeal process.

 

2. City Council advise the Province that:

 

a. it would support the elimination of "de novo" hearings that adjudicate planning appeals without deference to previous Council decisions, in the context of Bill 139's proposed two-step appeal process for Official Plans/Amendments and Zoning By-law appeals;

 

b. it seeks further clarification with regard to whether the intent of Bill 139 is to eliminate "de novo" hearings for each of the steps that comprise the proposed two-step appeal process;

  

c. it expresses its support for the direction taken by Bill 139 to place restrictions on holding oral hearings for Official Plans/Amendments and Zoning By-law matters; to establish time lines for making oral submissions; and to restrict parties or persons to orally offer new evidence or call or cross-examine witnesses;

 

d. it encourages the Province to set a prescribed timeline for reviewing the effectiveness of the two-stage hearing appeal process further to Bill 139 coming into force and effect;

  

e. it supports proposed Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act measures to case manage complex appeals through a "case management conference process"; and

 

f. regulations should be established prescribing key steps to be followed in the mandatory case management conference process to ensure the process fits seamlessly and effectively with the Tribunal's hearing process.

 

3.  City Council further request the Province to:

 

a.  consult with residents and municipalities on the forthcoming regulations and criteria for accessing the Local Planning Appeal Support Centres and ensure the Centres are properly funded and can provide adequate resources and representation to residents who require assistance before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal;

 

b.  ensure residents have the ability to fully participate at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal through the reinstatement of the expired Intervenor Funding Project Act or through the introduction of a new act that permits tribunals to provide additional funding to individuals and groups acting in the public interest, with costs to be borne by the applicant; and

 

c.  remove the City of Toronto from the jurisdiction of the Ontario Municipal Board and any subsequent and revised appeal board, thereby allowing appeals of City of Toronto planning decisions only through the Divisional Court or the Provincial Cabinet.

 

4. City Council support the establishment of an independent provincially funded Local Planning Appeal Support Centre through the introduction of the Local Planning Appeal Support Centre Act, 2017, on the assumption that the Centre will facilitate meaningful and more affordable public participation in Ontario's planning appeal process.

 

5. City Council support the increased planning application timeframe proposed in Bill 139, for Council to make a decision for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and Holding Provisions By-laws.

 

6. City Council request the Province to increase the length of time Council has to make a new decision when the new Local Planning Appeal Tribunal sends a planning matter back to Council for re-consideration from 90 days to 120 days.

 

7. City Council support Bill 139's proposal to shelter all statutory updates to Official Plans and municipal conformity exercises to Provincial Plans requiring the Minister's approval, (as per Section 26 of the Planning Act), from appeal.

 

8. City Council request the Province to place a moratorium on all privately initiated requests for official plan amendments to newly approved Official Plan policies that required the Minister's approval, (as per Section 26 of the Planning Act), unless Council declares otherwise by resolution.

 

9. City Council support the Bill 139 provision to remove interim control by-laws, when first passed, from appeal.

 

10. City Council support the introduction of a moratorium on privately initiated requests for secondary plan amendments in Bill 139 and request the Province to further amend Bill 139 to extend the moratorium to privately initiated implementing zoning by-laws passed concurrently with the secondary plan.

 

11. City Council support the introduction, in Bill 139, of a moratorium on privately initiated requests for Official Plan Amendments to "major transit station area" policies.

 

12. City Council request the Province to extend moratoriums to include privately initiated official plan amendments within those "Urban Growth Centres" that are planned to achieve by 2041, or have already achieved, a density target that exceeds the minimum density targets set out in the Growth Plan (2017).

 

13. City Council request the Province to extend all proposed moratorium periods from two to five years, unless Council declares otherwise by resolution.

 

14. City Council request the Province to release all regulations and transition policies associated with the proposed Planning Act amendments in draft form prior to Bill 139 coming into force.

 

15. City Council support the proposed requirement for municipalities to incorporate climate change policies into their Official Plans.

 

16. City Council support the proposal making it mandatory to send back new evidence on subdivision appeals to Council for re-evaluation.

 

17. City Council commend the Province for the extensive consultation process undertaken to inform the provincial strategy outlined in "Conserving Our Future: A Modernized Conservation Authorities Act".

 

18.  City Council recommend to the Province that the date of enactment of Bill 139 respecting appeals be retroactive to the day of the first reading of the Bill.

 

19. City Council forward the report (September 29, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to the Minister of Municipal Affairs for the Minister's information.

 

20. City Council direct appropriate staff to participate in further opportunities with the Province to provide feedback, including presentations and submissions, to the Province's Standing Committee on Social Policy examining Bill 139, with respect to the issues raised in the report (September 29, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

21. City Council request the City Solicitor to report to the Planning and Growth Management Committee, in the event that Bill 139 is given Royal Assent, with recommendations for any potential changes in the City's processes and procedures that may be required to implement the legislation.

Background Information (Committee)

(September 29, 2017) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Bill 139 - Proposed Amendments to the Planning Act and Province’s Land Use Planning Appeal System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-107629.pdf
(September 27, 2017) Report from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Bill 139 - Proposed Amendments to the Planning Act and Province’s Land Use Planning Appeal System - Notice of Pending Report.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-107319.pdf

Communications (Committee)

(October 11, 2017) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Association (PG.New.PG23.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/comm/communicationfile-72641.pdf
(October 11, 2017) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow (PG.New.PG23.7.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/comm/communicationfile-72618.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(November 6, 2017) E-mail from Michael Landry, Downtown Toronto Residents Associations' Alliance (CC.New.PG23.7.3)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/cc/comm/communicationfile-73460.pdf

Motions (City Council)

1 - Motion to Amend Item (Additional) moved by Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam (Carried)

That City Council further request the Province to:

 

a.  consult with residents and municipalities on the forthcoming regulations and criteria for accessing the Local Planning Appeal Support Centres and ensure the Centres are properly funded and can provide adequate resources and representation to residents who require assistance before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal;

 

b.  ensure residents have the ability to fully participate at the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal through the reinstatement of the expired Intervenor Funding Project Act or through the introduction of a new act that permits tribunals to provide additional funding to individuals and groups acting in the public interest, with costs to be borne by the applicant; and

 

c.  remove the City of Toronto from the jurisdiction of the Ontario Municipal Board and any subsequent and revised appeal board, thereby allowing appeals of City of Toronto planning decisions only through the Divisional Court or the Provincial Cabinet.

Vote (Amend Item (Additional)) Nov-09-2017 9:41 AM

Result: Carried Majority Required - PG23.7 - Wong-Tam - motion 1
Total members that voted Yes: 27 Members that voted Yes are Jon Burnside, John Campbell, Christin Carmichael Greb, Shelley Carroll, Josh Colle, Gary Crawford, Janet Davis, Glenn De Baeremaeker, Justin J. Di Ciano, Sarah Doucette, Paula Fletcher, Mary Fragedakis, Jim Hart, Norman Kelly, Mike Layton, Josh Matlow, Mary-Margaret McMahon, Joe Mihevc, Frances Nunziata (Chair), Cesar Palacio, James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Neethan Shan, David Shiner, John Tory, Lucy Troisi, Kristyn Wong-Tam
Total members that voted No: 3 Members that voted No are Michael Ford, Stephen Holyday, Denzil Minnan-Wong
Total members that were Absent: 15 Members that were absent are Paul Ainslie, Maria Augimeri, Ana Bailăo, Joe Cressy, Vincent Crisanti, Frank Di Giorgio, John Filion, Mark Grimes, Michelle Holland, Jim Karygiannis, Chin Lee, Giorgio Mammoliti, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, Michael Thompson

Motion to Adopt Item as Amended (Carried)

PG23.7 - Bill 139 - Proposed Amendments to the Planning Act and Province’s Land Use Planning Appeal System

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Wards:
All

Committee Recommendations

The Planning and Growth Management Committee recommends that: 

 

1. City Council commend the Province on its initiative to significantly improve and modernize the Ontario Municipal Board (the "OMB") and the Province's land use appeal process.

 

2. City Council advise the Province that:

 

a. it would support the elimination of "de novo" hearings that adjudicate planning appeals without deference to previous Council decisions, in the context of Bill 139's proposed two-step appeal process for Official Plans/Amendments and Zoning By-law appeals;

 

b. it seeks further clarification with regard to whether the intent of Bill 139 is to eliminate "de novo" hearings for each of the steps that comprise the proposed two-step appeal process;

  

c. it expresses its support for the direction taken by Bill 139 to place restrictions on holding oral hearings for Official Plans/Amendments and Zoning By-law matters; to establish time lines for making oral submissions; and to restrict parties or persons to orally offer new evidence or call or cross-examine witnesses;

 

d. it encourages the Province to set a prescribed timeline for reviewing the effectiveness of the two-stage hearing appeal process further to Bill 139 coming into force and effect;

  

e. it supports proposed Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act measures to case manage complex appeals through a "case management conference process"; and

 

f. regulations should be established prescribing key steps to be followed in the mandatory case management conference process to ensure the process fits seamlessly and effectively with the Tribunal's hearing process.

 

3. City Council support the establishment of an independent provincially funded Local Planning Appeal Support Centre through the introduction of the Local Planning Appeal Support Centre Act, 2017, on the assumption that the Centre will facilitate meaningful and more affordable public participation in Ontario's planning appeal process.

 

4. City Council support the increased planning application timeframe proposed in Bill 139, for Council to make a decision for Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and Holding Provisions By-laws.

 

5. City Council request the Province to increase the length of time Council has to make a new decision when the new Local Planning Appeal Tribunal sends a planning matter back to Council for re-consideration from 90 days to 120 days.

 

6. City Council support Bill 139's proposal to shelter all statutory updates to Official Plans and municipal conformity exercises to Provincial Plans requiring the Minister's approval, (as per Section 26 of the Planning Act), from appeal.

 

7. City Council request the Province to place a moratorium on all privately initiated requests for official plan amendments to newly approved Official Plan policies that required the Minister's approval, (as per Section 26 of the Planning Act), unless Council declares otherwise by resolution.

 

8. City Council support the Bill 139 provision to remove interim control by-laws, when first passed, from appeal.

 

9. City Council support the introduction of a moratorium on privately initiated requests for secondary plan amendments in Bill 139 and request the Province to further amend Bill 139 to extend the moratorium to privately initiated implementing zoning by-laws passed concurrently with the secondary plan.

 

10. City Council support the introduction, in Bill 139, of a moratorium on privately initiated requests for Official Plan Amendments to "major transit station area" policies.

 

11. City Council request the Province to extend moratoriums to include privately initiated official plan amendments within those "Urban Growth Centres" that are planned to achieve by 2041, or have already achieved, a density target that exceeds the minimum density targets set out in the Growth Plan (2017).

 

12. City Council request the Province to extend all proposed moratorium periods from two to five years, unless Council declares otherwise by resolution.

 

13. City Council request the Province to release all regulations and transition policies associated with the proposed Planning Act amendments in draft form prior to Bill 139 coming into force.

 

14. City Council support the proposed requirement for municipalities to incorporate climate change policies into their Official Plans.

 

15. City Council support the proposal making it mandatory to send back new evidence on subdivision appeals to Council for re-evaluation.

 

16. City Council commend the Province for the extensive consultation process undertaken to inform the provincial strategy outlined in "Conserving Our Future: A Modernized Conservation Authorities Act".

 

17.  City Council recommend to the Province that the date of enactment of Bill 139 respecting appeals be retroactive to the day of the first reading of the Bill.

 

18. City Council forward the report (September 29, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to the Minister of Municipal Affairs for his information.

 

19. City Council direct appropriate staff to participate in further opportunities with the Province to provide feedback, including presentations and submissions, to the Province's Standing Committee on Social Policy examining Bill 139, with respect to the issues raised in the report (September 29, 2017) from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning.

 

20. City Council request the City Solicitor to report to Planning and Growth Management Committee, in the event that Bill 139 is given Royal Assent, with recommendations for any potential changes in the City's processes and procedures that may be required to implement the legislation.

Origin

(September 29, 2017) Report from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning

Summary

In December of 2016, City Council adopted a series of recommendations in response to the Province's request for stakeholder feedback with regard to the scope and effectiveness of the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB).  On May 30, 2017, the Province introduced Bill 139, the Building Better Communities and Conserving Watersheds Act, 2017.  The Bill passed Second Reading September 27, 2017 and has been referred to the Standing Committee on Social Policy. 

 

If passed, Bill 139 will replace or amend a number of existing Acts, such as the Planning Act, the City of Toronto Act, the Ontario Municipal Board Act and the Conservation Authorities Act and change the provincial land use planning appeals system by:

 

- establishing a new two-step appeal process for Official Plans/Amendments and Zoning By-laws;
requiring mandatory case management for certain planning application appeals;

 

- creating a new Appeal Tribunal and new statutory rules regarding the conduct of hearings for land use planning appeals, through the enactment of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal Act;


- sheltering municipally initiated Official Plan Amendments that require the Minister's approval, from appeal;


- placing a two-year moratorium on amendments to newly approved Secondary Plans;
sheltering Interim Control By-laws from appeal;


- establishing longer timelines for municipal processing of planning applications; and


- establishing a "Local Planning Appeal Support Centre" to assist eligible Ontarians with navigating the land use planning appeal process.
 

This report summarizes and comments on key changes that would be brought about by the enactment of Bill 139, the Building Better Communities and Conserving Watersheds Act, 2017.  The report also provides recommendations for Council's consideration with respect to the proposed changes.  Legal Services has been consulted in the preparation of this report.

Background Information

(September 29, 2017) Report and Attachments 1-2 from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Bill 139 - Proposed Amendments to the Planning Act and Province’s Land Use Planning Appeal System
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-107629.pdf
(September 27, 2017) Report from the Acting Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning on Bill 139 - Proposed Amendments to the Planning Act and Province’s Land Use Planning Appeal System - Notice of Pending Report.
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/bgrd/backgroundfile-107319.pdf

Communications

(October 11, 2017) Letter from Geoff Kettel and Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chairs, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Association (PG.New.PG23.7.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/comm/communicationfile-72641.pdf
(October 11, 2017) Letter from Councillor Josh Matlow (PG.New.PG23.7.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2017/pg/comm/communicationfile-72618.pdf

Speakers

John Bossons, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Association
Cathie Macdonald, Co-Chair, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations
Geoff Kettel, Co-Chair, Federation of North Toronto Residents' Associations

Motions

Motion to Amend Item (Additional) moved by Councillor John Filion (Carried)

That:

 

1.  City Council recommend to the Province that the date of enactment of Bill 139 respecting appeals be retroactive to the day of the first reading of the Bill.


Motion to Adopt Item as Amended moved by Councillor David Shiner (Carried)
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council