Item - 2019.CC9.2

Tracking Status

  • City Council adopted this item on July 16, 2019 with amendments.

CC9.2 - Ombudsman Toronto Enquiry Report: Review of the Toronto Transit Commission's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Wards:
All

City Council Decision

City Council on July 16, 17 and 18, 2019 adopted the following:

 

1.  City Council adopt the Ombudsman Toronto Report and request the Toronto Transit Commission to implement all of the recommendations in the Enquiry Report (July 9, 2019) from the Ombudsman.

 

Ombudsman Recommendations:

 

Ensure that Unit Complaints Coordinator Investigations are Independent and Impartial


1.  The TTC should develop a plan to structurally strengthen the independence of its internal investigations of the Transit Enforcement Unit. This plan should include moving the Unit Complaints Coordinator away from the unit's physical location and reducing or eliminating personal and professional ties between the Unit Complaints Coordinator and support staff on one hand and the unit on the other.


2.  The TTC should strengthen its documentation of the Unit Complaints Coordinator's terms of reference and their role and mandate. It should include what kind of information, if any, the Unit Complaints Coordinator will exchange with TTC management and/or the TTC legal department and for what purpose(s).


3.  The TTC should also consider creating a protocol for retaining external investigators in appropriate cases, for example where there is intense public interest or where senior staff members are involved in the incident(s) under investigation.


Clarify the Standard of Proof

 

4.  All relevant TTC policies and training should clearly state that the standard of proof that applies in investigations of complaints about Transit Fare Inspectors is proof on a balance of probabilities.


Use Expert Opinions Appropriately

 

5.  The TTC should document in its investigation policies and procedures that: 

 

a.  As a best practice, when the TTC engages an expert to provide an opinion in an investigation, it should select someone without ties to the TTC.

 

b.  The TTC should also require any expert witness to provide written confirmation that they understand they are being asked for a fair, objective and non-partisan opinion.

 

c.  The TTC should provide all relevant evidence to the expert witness for their review and should have the witness prepare the opinion without assistance from investigators. The opinion itself should reflect that these steps were taken.

 

Investigator Training

 

6. The TTC should develop a plan to provide additional training to its internal investigators, in particular with respect to:

 

a.  identifying the issues and the facts in dispute

 

b.  procedural fairness

 

c.  preventing unconscious confirmation bias

 

d.  investigating unconscious bias/racial profiling

 

e.  making and explaining factual findings by considering and weighing all relevant evidence

 

f.  the standard of proof

 

g.  effectively communicating the results of an investigation in a report

 

2. City Council forward the Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism to the Toronto Transit Commission Board for adoption.

 
3. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission and appropriate Toronto Transit Commission staff to work with the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit; specifically, to work with the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit to address anti-black racism through ongoing learning and development initiatives for all staff, and to review transit enforcement policies and practices using the City of Toronto's Anti-Black Racism Analysis Tool.

 

4. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to report back to the Executive Committee during the first quarter of 2020 on the status of the Toronto Transit Commission's adoption of the Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism and an update of the progress of their work with the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit.

 
5. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to report to the Executive Committee during the first quarter of 2020 on the steps taken to address the recommendations outlined in the report (July 9, 2019) from the Ombudsman.

City Council Decision Advice and Other Information

The Ombudsman gave a presentation to City Council on the Review of the Toronto Transit Commission's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors.

Background Information (City Council)

(July 9, 2019) Cover report from the Ombudsman on Review of the Toronto Transit Commission's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors (CC9.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135716.pdf
(July 9, 2019) Ombudsman Toronto Enquiry Report: Review of the Toronto Transit Commission's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-135717.pdf
Presentation from the Ombudsman on Enquiry Report: Review of the TTC's Investigation of a February 18, 2018 Incident Involving Transit Fare Inspectors
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-136146.pdf

Motions (City Council)

1 - Motion to Amend Item (Additional) moved by Councillor Michael Thompson (Carried)

That:

 

1. City Council forward the Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism to the Toronto Transit Commission Board for adoption.

 
2. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission and appropriate Toronto Transit Commission staff to work with the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit; specifically, to work with the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit to address anti-black racism through ongoing learning and development initiatives for all staff, and to review transit enforcement policies and practices using the City of Toronto's Anti-Black Racism Analysis Tool.

 
3 City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to report back to the Executive Committee during the first quarter of 2020 on the status of the Toronto Transit Commission's adoption of the Toronto Action Plan to Confront Anti-Black Racism and an update of the progress of their work with the Confronting Anti-Black Racism Unit.

 
4. City Council request the Toronto Transit Commission Board to direct the Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission to report to the Executive Committee during the first quarter of 2020 on the steps taken to address the recommendations outlined in the report (July 9, 2019) from the Ombudsman.

Vote (Amend Item (Additional)) Jul-17-2019 6:12 PM

Result: Carried Majority Required - CC9.2 - Thompson - motion 1
Total members that voted Yes: 25 Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie, Ana Bailão, Brad Bradford, Shelley Carroll, Mike Colle, Gary Crawford, Joe Cressy, John Filion, Paula Fletcher, Michael Ford, Mark Grimes, Stephen Holyday, Jim Karygiannis, Cynthia Lai, Mike Layton, Jennifer McKelvie, Denzil Minnan-Wong, Frances Nunziata (Chair), James Pasternak, Gord Perks, Anthony Perruzza, Jaye Robinson, Michael Thompson, John Tory, Kristyn Wong-Tam
Total members that voted No: 0 Members that voted No are
Total members that were Absent: 1 Members that were absent are Josh Matlow

2 - Motion to Amend Item (Additional) moved by Councillor Gord Perks (Out of Order)

That City Council inform the Toronto Transit Commission Board that City Council will not fund any Transit Enforcement Officers in the 2020 budget.

Ruling by Speaker Frances Nunziata (Upheld)
Speaker Nunziata ruled motion 2 by Councillor Perks out of order as the matter of the 2020 budget is not before Council.
Challenged by Councillor Gord Perks


Motion to Adopt Item as Amended (Carried)

Point of Privilege by Councillor Michael Thompson

Councillor Thompson, rising on a Point of Privilege, stated that when he asked for this matter to be timed, he also asked that all relevant Toronto Transit Commission personnel be present. Councillor Thompson further stated that the lawyer for the Toronto Transit Commission has advised that the investigators are not present and he fails to understand why they are not present, since the questions are surrounding this particular report.

Ruling by Deputy Speaker Shelley Carroll
Deputy Speaker Carroll accepted the Point of Privilege and asked Rick Leary, Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission if it would be possible to have the authors and the investigators present. Deputy Speaker Carroll ruled that when the item was timed, Councillor Thompson had made that request, and she is trying to honour that Councillor's privilege. Deputy Speaker Carroll again asked if it would be possible to have the authors of the investigation present if the Item was stood down. Deputy Speaker Carroll further ruled that she would seek the City Solicitor's advice on Councillor Thompson's request.

Rick Leary, Chief Executive Officer, Toronto Transit Commission advised Council that it was not possible to have the investigators present today.

Deputy Speaker Carroll ruled that Councillor Thompson made clear, when he moved that the Item be timed that he had questions about the investigation and that he wanted the authors of the Toronto Transit Commission investigation report to be present, and they were not. Deputy Speaker Carroll ruled that, in the interest of time, Councillor Thompson has agreed to stand down his request and not insist that they be brought to the Chamber, but Deputy Speaker Carroll recognized that Councillor Thompson asked very clearly that the staff be here when the item was being considered.


Point of Order by Councillor Anthony Perruzza

Councillor Perruzza, rising on a Point of Order, stated that Council is dealing with a policy matter and the Deputy Speaker needs to be vigilant when Council is veering off into "Perry Mason territory", where Council is doing the investigation and review, and then sits as a court in judgment of what took place on the train that day.

Ruling by Deputy Speaker Shelley Carroll
Deputy Speaker Carroll accepted the Point of Order and thanked Councillor Perruzza for his remarks.

Deputy Speaker Carroll ruled that if Council is dealing with a report from the Ombudsman on an investigation then it is fair to ask questions of both the Ombudsman on her investigation and of Toronto Transit Commission staff about the investigation. Deputy Speaker Carroll further ruled that on the incident itself, that is a matter for litigation, and Council needs to leave that for another day, as that will be a matter that will likely be dealt with in closed session. So the questions have to be about the investigators and the investigation itself.


Point of Order by Mayor John Tory

Mayor Tory, rising on a Point of Order, stated that he wished to confirm whether the Deputy Speaker was seeking advice from the City Solicitor on whether the investigators are available but if they were available or not, whether it would be appropriate for Council to ask questions of them.

Ruling by Deputy Speaker Shelley Carroll
Deputy Speaker Carroll accepted the Point of Order and ruled that there are two issues. First, a Councillor did ask that Toronto Transit Commission staff be present in the Chamber and that point was recognized at the time. Second, the issue is whether or not Council can ask questions of the staff that the Ombudsman has investigated. Deputy Speaker Carroll ruled that has happened in the Chamber many times, so she would need to know why it can't happen this time. Deputy Speaker Carroll further ruled Council has a procedure that when an Accountability Officer brings a report forward, Council can ask questions of both the Accountability Officer and the staff being investigated.


Point of Order by Mayor John Tory

Mayor Tory, rising on a Point of Order, asked the Deputy Speaker if she would consider seeking the City Solicitor's advice on whether it would be advisable, given that the City is a party to litigation, for questions on the substance of the matter, as opposed to the process, to be asked now, in public.

Ruling by Deputy Speaker Shelley Carroll
Deputy Speaker Carroll accepted the Point of Order and ruled that the issue of closed session does come to bear and she will confer with the City Solicitor.


Point of Order by Councillor Jaye Robinson

Councillor Robinson, rising on a Point of Order, stated that it was very clear off the top of the presentation that this is about the investigation and not about the findings.

Ruling by Deputy Speaker Shelley Carroll
Deputy Speaker Carroll did not accept the Point of Order and ruled that this Point of Order has already been made by Councillor Perruzza and that the Deputy Speaker is consulting with the City Solicitor on the matter.

Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council