Item - 2019.NY10.1

Tracking Status

  • City Council adopted this item on November 26, 2019 with amendments.
  • This item was considered by the North York Community Council on November 5, 2019 and adopted without amendment. It will be considered by City Council on November 26, 2019.

NY10.1 - Request for Directions Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision Applications - 815 - 845 Eglinton Avenue East

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Amended
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

City Council Decision

City Council on November 26 and 27, 2019, adopted the following:

 

1.  City Council adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 and Confidential Attachment 2 to the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

3.  City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

 

The confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor were adopted by City Council and are now public, as follows:

 

1.  City Council accept the Settlement Offer as outlined in the correspondence from Goodmans LLP dated Tuesday, November 26, 2019 attached as Confidential Attachment 2 to the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor.

 

2.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other appropriate staff, to advise the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal of the settlement, and to attend at any future Local Planning Appeal Tribunal hearing events in support of the Settlement Offer proposal.

 

3.  In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold its order approving the Official Plan Amendment until the Tribunal is advised by legal counsel for the City that:

 

a.  the final form and content of the Official Plan Amendment is acceptable to the City; and

 

b.  RioCan has withdrawn its appeal of Official Plan Amendment 231.

 

4.  In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold its order approving the Zoning By-law Amendment until the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal is advised by legal counsel for the City that:

 

a.  the final form and content of the Zoning By-law Amendment is acceptable to the City;

 

b.  a Section 37 Agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning has been executed and registered to secure the Section 37 matters, as outlined in the Settlement Offer;

 

c.  peer reviews have been undertaken, at the expense of the owner, of the submitted:

 

i.  Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment Report;


ii.  Air Quality, Dust and Odour Assessment Report; and

 

iii.  Pedestrian Wind Study;

 

and any recommended mitigation measures are included in the subdivision conditions and/or Section 37 Agreement;

 

d.  the owner has at the owner’s expense addressed all outstanding engineering issues outlined in the memorandum dated September 20, 2019, and any other comments that may arise further to the review of materials submitted as part of the process to address the issues set out in the memorandum dated September 20, 2019 from Engineering and Construction Services and to ensure compliance with the City's Terms of Reference for the Functional Servicing Report and Hydrogeological Report as they relate to the Zoning By-law Zmendment appeal to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

e.  the owner has at the owner’s expense provided a Functional Servicing Report and Hydrogeological Report to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

f.  the owner has at the owner’s expense designed and provided financial securities for all required internal infrastructure and external upgrades to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report and Hydrogeological Report, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and General Manager, Toronto Water, according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report and Hydrogeological Report, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

g.  the implementation of the Functional Servicing Report and Hydrogeological Report, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services, does not require changes to the proposed amending by-laws or any such required changes have been made to the proposed amending by-laws to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the City Solicitor; and

 

h.  the By-laws and the Section 37 Agreement shall require the owner, at no cost to the City, prior to the issuance of any building permit for all or any part of the site, including for clarity, any conditional building permit, to:

 

i.  obtain all necessary permits to haul private water offsite with no discharge to any sewer until all required internal infrastructure and external upgrades to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Hydrogeological Report and Stormwater Management Report, are completed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; or

 

ii.  obtain all necessary permits to discharge private water to the storm sewer, pay all applicable fees, comply with all permit conditions, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services until all required internal infrastructure and external upgrades to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Hydrogeological Report and Stormwater Management Report, are completed to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Toronto Water and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; or

 

iii.  obtain all necessary permits and design, financially secure, construct, and make operational, all required internal infrastructure and external upgrades to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Hydrogeological Report and Stormwater Management Report, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the City Solicitor; and

 

iv.  regardless of which of the options set out in subsections 4.h.i. ii. or iii. above is selected, the owner is required to:

 

a.  submit all environmental site assessment reports describing the current site conditions and the proposed remedial action plans in accordance with the City’s Environmental Peer Review Policy and obtain concurrence from the third party peer reviewer to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and

 

b.  provide space within the development for installation of maintenance access holes and sampling ports on the private side, as close to the property line as possible, for both the storm and sanitary service connections, in accordance with the Sewers Chapter 681.10;

 

i. the By-laws and the Section 37 Agreement shall require the owner, at no cost to the City, prior to the issuance of any above grade permit for all or any part of the site, including for clarity, any conditional above-grade building permit, to design, financially secure, construct, and make operational, all required internal infrastructure and external upgrades to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Hydrogeological Report and Stormwater Management Report, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the City Solicitor;


 j.  the By-laws and the Section 37 Agreement require the owner, at no cost to the City, prior to issuance of any building permit for all or any part of the site, including for clarity, any conditional building permit, to conduct any remediation work for lands to be conveyed to the City identified through the Peer Review to the satisfaction of the Peer Reviewer of the Environmental Site Assessments and the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services; and

 

k.  the By-laws and the Section 37 Agreement shall require the owner, at no cost to the City, prior to the issuance of any above grade permit for all or any part of the site, including for clarity, any conditional above-grade building permit, to design, financially secure, construct, and make operational, all required internal infrastructure and external upgrades to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report, Hydrogeological Report and Stormwater Management Report, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the City Solicitor.

 

5.  In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal allows the appeals in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal to withhold its order approving the Plan of Subdivision appeal until the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal is advised by legal counsel for the City that:

 

a.  the City has provided the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal with a list of subdivision conditions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the owner has entered into a subdivision agreement with the City to secure matters related to the plan of subdivision, including all internal infrastructure and external upgrades to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor;

 

b.  the subdivision agreement shall require prior to issuance of any above grade building permit for all or any part of the site, including for clarity, any conditional building permit, the owner to design, financially secure, construct, and make operational the new public road to base course asphalt including all services and provide financial securities related to the future installation of traffic signals at Laird Drive and Vanderhoof Avenue, and Eglinton Avenue East and the new public street, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services; and

 

c.  the owner has addressed all outstanding engineering issues outlined in the memorandum of dated September 20, 2019, and any other comments that may arise further to the review of materials submitted as part of the process to address the issues set out in the memorandum dated September 20, 2019 from Engineering and Construction Services and to ensure compliance with the City's Terms of Reference for the Functional Servicing Report, Stormwater Management Report and Hydrogeological Report as they relate to the draft plan of subdivision appeal to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services.

 

6.  If an agreement to construct Above Base Park Improvements with the owner is reached, City Council approve a development charge credit against the Parks and Recreation component of the Development Charges for the design and construction by the owner of the Above Base Park Improvements on the lands dedicated to the City, to the satisfaction of the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation; the development charge credit shall be in an amount that is the lesser of the cost to the owner of designing and constructing the Above Base Park Improvements, as approved by the General Manager, Parks, Forestry and Recreation, and the Parks and Recreation component of development charges payable for the development in accordance with the City's Development Charges By-law, as may be amended from time to time.

 

7.  City Council authorize the City Solicitor and other City staff to take any necessary steps to implement City Council's decision.

 

Confidential Attachment 2 to the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor is now public and can be accessed under Background Information (City Council).

 

The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at this time in accordance with the provisions of the City of Toronto Act, 2006, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege. The balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor will be made public at the discretion of the City Solicitor. 

Confidential Attachment - Litigation or potential litigationthat affects the City or one of its agencies or corporations and advice or communications that are subject to solicitor-client privilege.

Background Information (Community Council)

(October 29, 2019) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1-6) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachments 7-12) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision Applications for 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-139495.pdf
(October 18, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications for 815-845 Eglinton Ave East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-139065.pdf

Background Information (City Council)

(November 26, 2019) Supplementary report from the City Solicitor on 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision Applications - Supplementary Request for Directions Report (NY10.1a)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-140690.pdf
Confidential Attachment 1
Confidential Attachment 2 - made public on December 3, 2019
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/bgrd/backgroundfile-140696.pdf

Communications (Community Council)

(November 5, 2019) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Co-President with Carol Burtin Fripp, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated (NY.New.NY10.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/comm/communicationfile-98898.pdf

Communications (City Council)

(November 27, 2019) Letter from Eileen Denny (CC.New.NY10.1.2)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/cc/comm/communicationfile-99389.pdf

Motions (City Council)

1 - Motion to Adopt Item as Amended moved by Councillor James Pasternak (Carried)

That City Council adopt the following recommendations in the supplementary report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor [NY10.1a]:

 

1.  City Council delete the North York Community Council recommendations and adopt the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1.

 

2.  City Council authorize the public release of the confidential instructions to staff in Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor, as well as Confidential Attachment 2 once adopted by City Council.

 

3.  City Council direct that the balance of Confidential Attachment 1 to the report (November 26, 2019) from the City Solicitor remain confidential at the discretion of the City Solicitor, as it contains advice that is subject to solicitor-client privilege.

NY10.1 - Request for Directions Report - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision Applications - 815 - 845 Eglinton Avenue East

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Adopted
Ward:
15 - Don Valley West

Community Council Recommendations

North York Community Council recommends that:

 

1. City Council authorize the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, to appear before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) hearing to oppose the appeal respecting the Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision applications in their current form for the lands at 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East.

 

2. City Council authorize the City Solicitor and appropriate staff to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve the outstanding issues outlined in the report (October 29, 2019) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District regarding 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East, and report back to City Council on the outcome of discussions, if necessary.

 

3. Should the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal approve the applications, City Council direct the City Solicitor to advise the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal that the Zoning By-laws should not be approved without the provision of such services, facilities or matters pursuant to Section 37 of the Planning Act, as may be considered appropriate by the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning in consultation with the applicant and the Ward Councillor.

 

4. In the event that the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) allows the appeal in whole or in part, City Council direct the City Solicitor to request the LPAT to withhold the issuance of any Orders on the Official Plan and/or Zoning By-law Amendments and/or Plan of Subdivision appeals for the subject lands until such time as:

 

a. the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been advised by the City Solicitor that the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments are in a form and with content satisfactory to the City;

 

b. the City Solicitor confirms the satisfactory execution and registration of a Section 37 Agreement satisfactory to the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning to secure the Section 37 matters;

 

c. a peer review of the submitted Environmental Noise and Vibration Assessment Report has been undertaken, at the expense of the applicant, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and any recommended mitigation measures are included in the subdivision conditions and/or Section 37 Agreement;

 

d. a peer review of the submitted Air Quality, Dust and Odour Assessment Report has been undertaken, at the expense of the applicant, to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and any recommended mitigation measures are included in the subdivision conditions and/or Section 37 Agreement;

 

e. the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has been provided with a list of subdivision conditions to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning and the Owner has entered into a subdivision agreement with the City to secure matters related to the plan of subdivision, to the satisfaction of the Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the Director, Community Planning, North York District and the City Solicitor;

 

f. the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal has received confirmation from the City Solicitor that the Owner has at the Owner's expense:

 

i. addressed all outstanding engineering issues outlined in the memo dated September 20, 2019, from Engineering and Construction Services as they relate to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment applications, and Plan of Subdivision application, to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services;

 

ii. provided a Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, satisfactory to the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, and the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

iii. designed and provided financial securities for any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and General Manager, Toronto Water, should it be determined that improvements or upgrades are required to support the development, according to the accepted Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Toronto Water;

 

iv. confirmation from the City Solicitor that the implementation of the Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, accepted by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services and the General Manager, Transportation Services does not require changes to the   proposed amending by-laws or any such required changes have been made to the proposed amending by-laws to the satisfaction of the Chief Planner, City Planning Division and the City Solicitor;

 

v. that should it be deemed necessary by the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the by-laws and the Section 37 agreement shall require the owner, at no cost to the City, prior to the issuance of any above grade permit for all or any part of the site, including for clarity, any conditional above-grade building permit, to design, financially secure, construct, and make operational, any upgrades or required improvements to the existing municipal infrastructure identified in the accepted Functional Servicing Report and Stormwater Management Report, to support the development, all to the satisfaction of the Chief Engineer and Executive Director, Engineering and Construction Services, the General Manager, Toronto Water, and the City Solicitor; and

 

g. the owner withdraws its appeal to Official Plan Amendment 231 as part of the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal case number PL140860.

Origin

(October 29, 2019) Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District

Summary

Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision applications have been submitted to the City, proposing the redevelopment of the existing 3.56 hectare (8.8 acre) site at the southeast corner of Eglinton Avenue East and Laird Drive at 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East. Proposed are a mix of uses comprised of residential, commercial, and office with various heights of 2, 4, 10, 12, 18, 21, 36 and 38-storeys, a total of 1,673 residential units, a floor space index of 3.84, gross floor area of 138,830 square metres, a 2,100 square metre (1-storey) community space, and a 3,770 square metre public park.  Also proposed are a private internal street and a new public street extension of Don Avon Drive.

 

The Official Plan Amendment application was submitted on August 19, 2016, and has been appealed to the Ontario Municipal Board, now Local Planning Appeal Tribunal  (LPAT) as of October 3, 2017, and the Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision applications were submitted on July 30, 2018, and have been appealed to the LPAT as of October 2, 2019, as a result of Council's failure to make a decision within the time prescribed by the Planning Act.  A full hearing at the LPAT was scheduled to commence on November 12 to 22, 2019.  The parties to the Official Plan Amendment appeals have also agreed to pursue private mediation, which is tentatively scheduled to take place on November 18, 19 and 20, 2019, and which may include consideration of all three related applications.  A case management conference (CMC) will also take place at the LPAT on Thursday, November 14, 2019

 

The report recommends that the City Solicitor, together with City Planning staff and any other City staff as appropriate, appear before the Local Planning Appeal Tribunal (LPAT) hearing to oppose the applications in their current form and to continue discussions with the applicant in an attempt to resolve outstanding issues outlined in this report. 

 

In terms of site organization, the proposal is generally consistent with the Laird in Focus study objectives.  However, the proposal in its current form is not in keeping with the Council endorsed Laird in Focus Planning Study heights which are being considered  through the draft Site and Area Specific Policy (SASP 568) at North York Community Council on November 5, 2019. 

Background Information

(October 29, 2019) Report and City of Toronto Data/Drawings (Attachments 1-6) and Applicant Submitted Drawings (Attachments 7-12) from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision Applications for 815-845 Eglinton Avenue East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-139495.pdf
(October 18, 2019) Notice of Pending Report from the Director, Community Planning, North York District on Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment and Plan of Subdivision Applications for 815-845 Eglinton Ave East
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/bgrd/backgroundfile-139065.pdf

Communications

(November 5, 2019) Letter from Geoff Kettel, Co-President with Carol Burtin Fripp, Leaside Property Owners Association Incorporated (NY.New.NY10.1.1)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2019/ny/comm/communicationfile-98898.pdf

Motions

Motion to Adopt Item moved by Councillor James Pasternak (Carried)
Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council