Item - 2022.GL32.34

Tracking Status

GL32.34 - Next Steps for Casa Loma’s North of Austin Terrace Properties - Creating a Public Vision for a Public Heritage Site

Decision Type:
ACTION
Status:
Deferred Indefinitely
Ward:
12 - Toronto - St. Paul's

Committee Decision

The General Government and Licensing Committee deferred the consideration of this item indefinitely.

Origin

(June 17, 2022) Letter from City Council referring Member Motion on Next Steps for Casa Loma’s North of Austin Terrace Properties - Creating a Public Vision for a Public Heritage Site

Summary

City Council on June 15 and 16, 2022, referred Motion MM45.25 to the General Government and Licensing Committee.

 

Summary from Member Motion:

 

Since being selected as the operator of Casa Loma, the Liberty Entertainment Group has unquestionably revitalized the heritage site. However, there is still a need for community consultation to create a vision for the North of Austin Terrace site.


The item at City Council that awarded the Request for Proposal to Liberty in 2013 was EX35.2 - Casa Loma Request for Proposals - Operator for Main House and Grounds. The Staff Recommendations for the item clearly delineated the North of Austin Terrace as a separate entity, intended for a different use and/or operator:


6.  City Council request that the Casa Loma Corporation review options for the north portion of the Casa Loma complex, including consideration of issuance of an Request for Expressions of Interest, and in doing so:


a. identify a vision and uses for the north portion of the Casa Loma complex

 

b. ensure the vision and uses proposed are complimentary to the heritage, tourism and event uses at the Main House and Grounds

 

c. preclude the sale of City owned lands

 

d. provide that the review process includes significant community and key stakeholder consultation


In advance of awarding the Request for Proposal for the North of Austin Terrace site in April of 2015, Staff cited a lone public consultation meeting on February 26, 2015 in response to City Council Item IA43.1. This does not meet City Council direction as cited above in Recommendation 6 Executive Committee Item EX32.5 (2013) and ignores Recommendation 8, which obligated Staff to report back to City Council on Recommendation 6 prior to moving forward with a Request for Proposal:


8.  City Council direct that Casa Loma Corporation, through the City Manager, report to Council on the review process for the north portion of Casa Loma; and that the City Manager report back on the appropriate future governance structure for the Casa Loma complex no later than the spring of 2015.

 

In short, the vision for the site was supposed to be set by the community and Council prior to the Request for Proposal being issued. This was not done. That’s why this Motion seeks to rectify this error by directing Staff to move forward with the process laid out in 2013 for the North of Austin Terrace Site.

Background Information

(June 17, 2022) Letter from City Council referring Member Motion on Next Steps for Casa Loma’s North of Austin Terrace Properties - Creating a Public Vision for a Public Heritage Site
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/gl/bgrd/backgroundfile-227740.pdf

Communications

(July 4, 2022) Submission from Nick Di Donato, Liberty Entertainment Group (GL.Supp)
https://www.toronto.ca/legdocs/mmis/2022/gl/comm/communicationfile-154039.pdf

Speakers

Nick Di Donato, Liberty Entertainment Group
Stacey Hawkins, Liberty Entertainment Group

Motions

Motion to Defer Item Indefinitely moved by Councillor Frances Nunziata (Carried)

That the item be deferred indefinitely.

Vote (Defer Item Indefinitely) Jul-04-2022

Result: Carried Majority Required
Total members that voted Yes: 4 Members that voted Yes are Paul Ainslie (Chair), Stephen Holyday, Nick Mantas, Frances Nunziata
Total members that voted No: 2 Members that voted No are John Filion, Josh Matlow
Total members that were Absent: 0 Members that were absent are

Point of Privilege by Councillor Josh Matlow

Councillor Matlow, on a Point of Privilege, stated that the Members' questions to the public speaker should not be a referendum on his calendar availability or about whether he accepts invitations to meetings.

Ruling by Councillor Paul Ainslie
Chair Ainslie ruled that Councillor Matlow had asked the public speaker questions about his own calendar availability and accepting invitations, and the Chair ruled that Councillor Nunziata could continue to ask the public speaker questions along the same line.


Point of Privilege by Councillor Josh Matlow

Councillor Matlow, on a Point of Privilege, stated that he had not received answers to his questions of staff during his questioning time.

Ruling by Councillor Paul Ainslie
Chair Ainslie ruled that Councillor Matlow did receive answers from staff.

Rulings

Ruling by Councillor Paul Ainslie
Chair Ainslie ruled that Councillor Matlow had characterized staff as having "absurd" and "unrealistic" responses to his questions, and asked Councillor Matlow to retract those comments. Councillor Matlow subsequently retracted his comments.

Source: Toronto City Clerk at www.toronto.ca/council